BUSH AND CHENEY STEALING WITH, FROM EACH OTHER

UNPRECEDENTED CRIMINAL CRISIS AT THE WHITE HOUSE

Thursday 25 October 2007 20:39

UPDATE/ADDENDUM: 27th OCTOBER:

MISPRISION OF FELONY LETTER TO THE WISCONSIN JUDGE
On 26th October, the Editor of this service wrote to Judge James L Martin, of the Dane County Circuit Court, Branch 17, Madison, Wisconsin, placing the Judge on notice that we are not prepared to wait until the end of the solar system for the Court to address the Wisconsin State tax fabrication scandal (a.k.a. ‘Wisconsingate’: see our report dated 6th August 2007: Archive), which procured that Ambassador Leo Wanta was convicted on a trumped-up State tax charge for 22 years in the GULAG in a grotesque miscarriage of justice THAT HAS TO BE RECTIFIED.

Furthermore, the Editor of this service requires a proper accounting for his $35,000 two-year loan with which the Ambassador’s freedom (the ending of his probation, which would otherwise have continued until 28th November 2010) was purchased (extortion money).

In order not to encumber the present report with this further addendum, the Editor’s letter and a brief commentary can be accessed ABOVE the present report, under the heading given above.

To access the 27th October ‘Judge’ report, press Archive and select the report ABOVE this one.

The report posted on 25th October is as follows:

• THE QUEEN’S GOLD HAS BEEN RESTORED TO HER OWNERSHIP

• VAST ACCRUALS GENERATED OUT OF THE QUEEN’S GOLD

• WHY WAS THE QUEEN’S GOLD STOLEN? SEE BELOW

• IMF MANAGING DIRECTOR APPEARS TO LIE TO THE EDITOR

• CHENEY TRIES TO STEAL THE PRESIDENT’S STOLEN $45 BILLION

• THE IMF DEPUTY MD CONTRADICTS HIS MANAGING DIRECTOR

• IMF OFFICIALS MAKE NO DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN ON- AND OFF THE BOOKS

• BUT THE G-7 POWERS ALLUDE TO THE NEW ‘UNIFORM’ BANKING SYSTEM

• THE NEW ‘UNIFORM’ SYSTEM WILL HAVE A HEDGE FUND HOLE

• THE WANTA PLAN IS TRANSPARENT, CLEAN AND HONEST:
• THAT’S WHY THEY HATE IT

• THE MANDAMUS CASE CHARADE, THE O.N.I. JUDGE, AND THE O.N.I. IMPOSTOR

• COURT ‘ACCIDENTALLY’ INSERTS SEPARATE DRUG CASE INTO WANTA’S RECORD

• EMBASSY SUITES ROOM PROBABLY ENTERED WHILE WE’RE IN COURT

• ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY IS GRANDDAUGHTER OF WANTA JOURNALIST

• BLATANT CONSPIRACY TO DEPRIVE WANTA OF COURT DOCUMENTS

• CLERK OF THE COURT MAKES HER OWN FEEBLE EXCUSES

• IMPOSTOR O.N.I. OPERATIVE PULLS DOWN HIS PANTS

• THE PHOTO FRAME-UP IN THE BASEMENT CAR PARK

• THE O.N.I. ASSASSIN’S DIRTY BLACKMAIL TRICKS EXPOSED

• THE ASSASSIN DEMANDS MONEY WITH MENACING THREATS

• THE AMBASSADOR DESCRIBES HIS TIME IN THE GULAG

• GETTING TO THE LIBRARY WITHOUT BEING ASSAULTED

• 147 INTERPOL AGENTS AND MASS ARRESTS OF BANKERS

• PATTERN OF ARRESTS SINCE PAULSON LAST DECEMBER

• THE ON-OFF EMBARGO AGAINST THE UNITED STATES

• BROWN BACKS CROOK BLAIR FOR THE E.U. PRESIDENCY

• POSSIBLE NUCLEAR BLACKMAIL ON AMERICAN SOIL

• PLANNING A NUKE EXPLOSION TO AVOID PAYING WANTA?

• TWIN CITIES PREDICTION JUDGED TO BE ACCURATE

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for ‘Wantagate’ reports since April 2006. [Note: A new panel giving details of our latest publications as they are made available, has been added].

• Please Make a Donation to help fund Christopher Story‘s ongoing financial corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial corruption and global financial crisis in history. This website has been calling the shots, because of the hijacking of Wanta’s Settlement.

• Emails addressed to us which lack coordinates identifying the sender will be trashed unread. The Editor publishes all his coordinates, as has always been the case, as he has nothing to hide.

FIVE WANTAGATE REPORTS ‘SNIPPED’ BY CRIMINAL U.S. INTELLIGENCE
While preparing this update we noticed that the following five recent reports appeared to have been ‘snipped’ by criminal U.S. intelligence (NSA): 8 September; 17 September; 20 September; 30 September; 04 October. These are obviously among the most sensitive and dangerous reports for the criminal cadres. Interfering with a foreign website is illegal. Our IT resources HAVE RESTORED THESE REPORTS as at 2.30pm EDT on 25th October 2007. Since some of the closing text on the crucial Citibank exposure posting dated 4th October was lost, the Editor has rebuilt that report and has added the following two paragraphs for good measure:

IN SUMMARY, AND MOST SERIOUSLY OF ALL, ESPECIALLY FOR ALL TRUSTEES:

• • Citibank/Citigroup acknowledges that it has set a precedent for the bank itself to dictate to clients and others whose funds it holds, the terms upon which it will ‘allow’ owners of funds to access their money, and that it may at any time encumber the funds for its own purposes as it sees fit, without reference to the owner of the funds.

[Archive: Citibank as a criminal enterprise: 04 October].

• • It has sent a clear signal to ALL TRUSTEES that if they continue to hold funds with Citibank/ Citigroup, they do so entirely at their own risk while running the additional risk that they may be vulnerable to being sued by the beneficiaries for placing their funds held in trust, IN DANGER. A trustee must act at all times strictly in the interests of the beneficiaries and must never allow his or her fiduciary responsibilities to be compromised. Manifestly, a trustee holding funds with Citibank who is aware of THIS CASE must take IMMEDIATE ACTION to protect his or her beneficiaries’ assets, which, given the circumstances described in this case and in this report [04 October], MUST MEAN that funds held in trust may require added protection, and that the trustee MUST BE SEEN TO BE TAKING ALL MEASURES NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE FUNDS HELD IN TRUST.

THAT IS THE LEGAL POSITION.

• • That may mean, given this case, removing the funds from Citibank/Citigroup altogether.

• • WHILE THE EDITOR WAS ADDING THE ABOVE ADDENDUM, THE BUTTON HE USES TO ‘CONFIRM’ THE APPLICATION OF TEXT TO THE PRESENT WEBSITE TEMPLATE WAS BEING INDEPENDENTLY JIGGERED BY SOME THIRD CLASS, ONE-STRIPE NSA IDIOT WHO WAS TRYING TO IMPEDE THE EDITOR’S WORK.

THE NSA IDIOT TURNED OFF THE EDITOR’S WEBSITE SCREEN THREE TIMES, AND THEN INSERTED QUESTION MARKS IN PLACE OF ALL QUOTATION MARKS. AS AN INTENDED RESULT OF THIS CRUDE CRIMINAL INTRUSION, IT HAS TAKEN THE EDITOR MANY HOURS TO PUT THIS REPORT UP ON THE WEBSITE. THESE U.S. CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WERE REPORTED TO BE ATTACKING ALL OUR COMPUTERS, INCLUDING THOSE OF LAWYERS AND THE PRINCIPALS THEMSELVES (NOTHING NEW FOR THEM).

Here, despite these criminal attempts to derail us, is the latest Wantagate update. PLEASE NOTE THAT IT HAS BEEN ‘SNIPPED’ SEVERAL TIMES WHILE THE EDITOR WAS TRYING TO UPLOAD.

ROGUE ACTOR PAULSON CONDEMNS ROGUE ACTORS
‘We must continue to apply robust efforts to combat illicit money flows to safeguard the financial system from abuse, support development and economic growth, and protect citizens worldwide’.

‘By implementing the Financial Action Task Force’s (FATF) international safeguards on money laundering and terrorist financing, countries worldwide can help make the global financial system an inhospitable venue for terrorists, proliferators, narcotics traffickers, and other rogue actors’.

This statement, issued by the US Treasury Department Office of Public Affairs on 20th October 2007, is taken from the penultimate paragraph of the Statement by the rogue actor with whom we are so familiar, namely the US Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson, Jr., at last weekend’s Meeting of the International Monetary and Financial Committee (the IMFC) of the Board of Governors of the International Monetary Fund, held during the Annual Meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, which closed in Washington DC, on 22nd October.

HYPOCRISY, DECEIT AND DOUBLE-MINDEDNESS ON DISPLAY
Normal people, including almost all financial journalists attending the Annual Meetings who work in darkness and do not yet begin to comprehend the meaning of the word ‘double-mindedness’, and who therefore do not understand that these high-level ‘rogue actors’, to re-use the phrase with which Paulson described himself so accurately, routinely say the opposite to what they do, will doubtless have been falsely reassured by these platitudes.

Such people will therefore have missed the point that they summarise, with pinpoint accuracy, the lawless behaviour over which Mr Henry M. Paulson, Jr., has himself presided, and which he has facilitated, ever since he replaced John Snow and hijacked the Wanta Settlement of $4.5 trillion remitted by the People’s Bank of China in good faith by way of a private transaction in favour of Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta, in June 2006.

‘GENIES WHICH MOVED OUT OF THE BOTTLE’
Following the conclusion of the International Monetary and Financial Committee Meeting, a press conference, attended by the Editor of this service, was held in the auditorium of the Press Rooms at the IMF Headquarters 1 Building. Addressing the entire world’s press were Mr Padoa-Schioppa, Chairman of the IMFC, Sr. Rodrigo de Rato, outgoing Managing Director of the IMF, and Mr Lipsky, the First Deputy Managing Director of the IMF. Mr Padoa-Schioppa’s brief survey of what the IMFC had discussed and agreed included the following observations:

‘The [market] turbulence has revealed a number of problems that may be deeper than the specific episode that triggered the tensions. There are developments in the financial system which are like genies which moved out of the bottle and are hard to follow, to understand. There is a clear need for supervisory bodies. But even for the very financial institutions which create these new instruments, to understand better what their creatures are doing out in the market. And this is clearly reason for concern’.

These comments alluded to paragraph 4 of the Communiqué of the IMFC of the Board of Governors of the International Monetary Fund, distributed to the media at the press conference, which reads:

‘Ministers and Central Bank Governors had a useful discussion today on the lessons emerging from the current episode of financial market turbulence, and are committed to continuing to work together, including multilaterally, to analyze the nature of the disturbances and consider lessons to be learned and actions needed to prevent further turbulence’.

‘The Committee agrees that financial innovation and securitization, while having contributed to enhanced risk diversification and improved market efficiency, have also created some new challenges that need to be properly addressed’.

THE EDITOR’S QUESTION TO THE IMF’S MANAGING DIRECTOR
Shortly after the conclusion of the panel’s introductory remarks, the Editor of International Currency Review was privileged to be able to direct the following question to the platform at the press conference:

‘I refer to paragraph 4 [of the Communiqué]. In particular, to the genies which moved out of the bottle. And lessons to be learned. The phrase lessons to be learned always means that something has gone pear-shaped. I’m not sure whether this is a question which you want me to ask, but I’m going to ask it. Did you discuss or are you discussing or will you ever discuss the scandal of the massive, untaxed, corrupt, off-balance sheet transactions which take place off-balance sheet, which we know about, and which are the fundamental underlying cause of the disturbances which are taking place? And why are you discussing, why do you use the word, the adjective ‘new’, in respect of the challenges which need to be properly addressed, at the end of paragraph 4, when if what I’m referring to is what you are referring to, they are not new?’

‘And finally, when will the Wanta Settlement of $4.5 trillion be paid?’

Bearing in mind that the IMF itself presides over the Wanta Settlement and associated overdue US domestic and delayed international settlement payments, and also recalling the (Leninist) double-mindedness factor – which enables ‘the initiated’ to lie with ‘impunity’ – the answer to this question proffered by the outgoing Managing Director of the IMF, was as revealing as was the fact that the transcript of the press conference, which the Editor has in front of him as this report is being written, spelled Wanta correctly. (Manifestly, if the staff and management of the IMF had never heard of Wanta, they would have been liable to misspell his name, e.g. Wonter)

IMF, IN CHARGE OF SETTLEMENT, DENIES KNOWLEDGE OF IT
Sr. Rodrigo de Rato: ‘I don’t know what settlement you are referring to. But what I understand from your question, first of all, there are some new challenges, no question [about] it. Some new [challenges] because of the circumstances that happened in August, have created new challenges by definition, the markets, the liquidity of some markets will not happen before August’ [sic].

‘And, that is a new challenge, but also, I think, the new challenge has a broader sense, of the new challenges that the new globalization is producing, which is linkages and is also the fact that there are new instruments that have been very useful in spreading risk and reducing the price of risk, but at the same time is clearly [sic] that those new instruments pose questions of transparency, pose questions regarding off-balance sheet operations, pose questions of due diligence by investors, pose questions of the rating, understanding of ratings, and just to mention a few’.

‘These are new things. New things because of the change in the global environment because of the credit crisis of the summer, and there is new things [sic] because the markets have innovated in such a way in the recent years that this test that the markets have produced, have endured, is producing new questions, no question about it, that we are facing new issues. At the same time we also face new opportunities’.

MANAGING DIRECTOR OF THE IMF APPEARS TO HAVE LIED TO THE EDITOR
The purpose of asking loaded questions at these controlled press conferences is not to solicit information from the bureaucrats on the podium, since they invariably respond with platitudes, generalities and linguistic evasions, but rather to inform both the platform and the world’s somnolent media of the nature of the real issues that need to be addressed.

The departing Managing Director’s statement that he had no knowledge of the Wanta Settlement represented an egregious lie, unless key operations at the Fund take place secretly behind the Managing Director’s back, in which case the head of the IMF is by definition vulnerable to being exposed as nothing more than a front by anyone from the media who knows what he or she is talking about. Since this appears unlikely, the only possible conclusion to be reached is that Sr. de Rato told an outright lie in front of the world’s press.

Of course the IMF knows everything there is to know about the Wanta Settlement.

It is in charge of implementing it.

ANOTHER JOURNALIST ASKS THE SAME QUESTION DIFFERENTLY
Subsequently, a member of the US ‘mainstream’ press asked the following related question, not understanding, perhaps, that he was asking basically the same question as the Editor of this service. In his response, Mr Lipsky, the First Deputy Managing Director of the Fund, contradicted his Managing Director. Here is the sequence:

Q: ‘Perhaps Mr Lipsky can comment on this, because this is with an eye to the future. One number: 416 trillion. I’m going to repeat that number: 416 trillion. That is the number given by the Bank for International Settlements in their last report, on the estimated value of the number of derivatives that have been written. Most of those counterparties [are] expecting payment, should they be realized, in dollars. Are the Fund studying that question and talk[ing] about the transparency of that market in the future, and is it of greater concern to the Fund than it has been in the past?’

Interrupting the sequence for the moment: (a) International Currency Review, the Journal of the World Financial Community, has published an estimated figure for outstanding derivatives of $1,400 trillion, which no-one in the public or the private sector has contradicted; (b) The Bank for International Settlements’ estimated number of $416 trillion is universally laughed at as being, at a minimum, at least one-third the size it should be; and (c) the Bank for International Settlements itself, being involved in this off-balance sheet business, has falsified its estimated number on purpose, in order to minimise public alarm at the reality of the situation – which is as follows:

IMF OFFICIALS TALK IN TECHNICAL GENERALITIES
Because of the unrestrained, criminal off-balance sheet free-for all that has proliferated over the several decades since the collapse of the Bretton Woods system, and because criminal intelligence operatives holding the highest offices in the United States and elsewhere treat their high office as affording them permission to engage in fraudulent off-balance sheet, untaxed, secret financial transactions for their own enrichment and to imagine they can continue doing so with impunity, the US dollar is encumbered by obligations so gigantic that it stands on the verge of a catastrophic collapse, the sole known antidote to which, that is on the table, is the Wanta Settlement and Plan. Since the whole of the international community at intergovernmental level knows all about the Wanta Plan, the assertion by Sr. de Rato that he has no knowledge of it, is a disgraceful and cynical affront and insult to the world’s media – ignorant, headstrong and complacent though most of their members undoubtedly are, in this Editor’s long experience.

CHENEY TRIES TO STEAL PRESIDENT’S STOLEN $45 BILLION
Nor was it likely that those on the platform were unaware of the latest intelligence about ongoing financial corruption. On the eve of the IMF/World Bank Annual Meetings, it was reported behind-the-scenes that a long-serving banker of Pakistani origin based at the New York office of Crédit Suisse diverted $45 billion for a secret personal account held by Halliburton in Dubai for Vice President Richard B Cheney (the suffix vice’ being only too appropriate here). It transpired that the $45 billion in question represented stolen money held in trust for the President of the United States, George Bush Jr. In other words, the Vice President of the United States was caught stealing stolen funds ‘belonging’ to his colleague, the President of the United States.

This illegal transaction was frustrated by a secret fail-safe mechanism, the banker was arrested and shortly afterwards, under interrogation, suffered a mysterious heart attack. On 24th October it was reported that funds are still being stolen by highest-level officials, making it crystal clear that the US Government is controlled by organised criminals. Laura Bush was reported to have flown hurriedly to Dubai to take care of Bush family stolen money banking issues.

VAST ACCRUALS GENERATED OUT OF THE QUEEN’S GOLD
It is reported that massive amounts of money were illegally generated from trading The Queen’s gold. Barclays Bank, which appears to be grossly corrupt, is alleged to have been involved. The sums are so massive that hiding them, in the face of the ‘incoming’ new ‘uniform’ financial system (which will have a hole in it called ‘hedge funds’), is a serious problem for the cleptocracy, headed by George Bush Jr. (and Sr.). It is likely that the delays that have been experienced in finalising the Wanta Settlement are associated with the ‘necessity’ for the vast fiat money generated from The Queen’s stolen gold to be hidden and stashed away in an illuminati bolt-hole beforehand. Why did they steal The Queen’s gold? Because this was ‘the last chance’ they had to generate the colossal volume of funds that they need to be able to continue financing the World Revolution. Was Laura Bush involved in ‘placing’ and representing the President of the United States in Dubai? You bet.

CHENEY THEFT ‘COLLAPSES’ CREDIT SUISSE
The collateral damage from the Crédit Suisse theft by Cheney’s associate took the form of the sudden, unannounced collapse of Crédit Suisse, as of about 2.30pm Eastern Daylight Time on Friday, 19th October, and its secret takeover by Union Bank of Switzerland. The policy concerning this matter appears to have been to operate a total blackout, with the practical consequence that, for public consumption, Crédit Suisse remains ‘in business’, given the catastrophic global consequences that would ensue if the somnolent and blinded ‘mainstream’ media, which operates as noted in the darkness, were to become aware of the facts of this matter. It will be recalled that we have predicted that major banks will collapse as a consequence of this open-ended criminality: the first forecast global bank collapse duly occurred last Friday.

For our purposes here, this incident illustrates the cynicism and hypocrisy which envelops the public pronouncements of many of the terrified international bureaucrats and bankers for whom the bell is tolling and whom, as the outgoing IMF Managing Director’s response to this Editor made clear, have been scrabbling to work out how to prevent or postpone a global calamity of their own making – and who have steadfastly refused to want to understand that these fraudulent financial transactions are what the holders of the highest US official offices ‘do’. That’s what they lusted after before they ascended to their lofty positions, and what they spend most of their time in office seeking to accomplish. Unfortunately for them, they have run out of time, yet do not even appear to acknowledge that this is the case.

Only last August, President George W. Bush Jr. traveled to Tennessee, did he not, where a certain drug dealer faced a term in jail not unadjacent to 25 years. Shortly after the President left Tennessee, the drug dealer in question received a sentence of six months. This is a ‘taster’ for the narrative on the Wanta Mandamus kangaroo court episode that the Editor describes below. But first, let’s complete the sequence we have started, with Mr Lipsky’s response to that ‘mainstream’ question, in which he contradicted Sr. de Rato:

IMF DEPUTY MD CONTRADICTS HIS MANAGING DIRECTOR
Mr Lipsky: ‘I’ll be happy to respond… First of all, the derivatives market is not new. It has existed in various forms for decades’.

At so-called press ‘conferences’, no actual ‘conference’ ever takes place. On the contrary, formal statements are made, followed by ‘questions’, which are then answered by officials on the platform. There is no discussion. If such events were ‘conferences’, the Editor would have been afforded an opportunity to point out that the Managing Director of the IMF, Mr Lipsky’s colleague, had just stated, in his reply to the Editor, that all these problems are ‘new’ – ‘new’ was one of the elements of paragraph 4 of the IMFC’s communiqué that this Editor had pulled the platform up for, in his prior question. Notwithstanding this glaring contradiction of his boss, Mr Lipsky sailed on regardless:

‘It has been growing rapidly. It has been, the growth in the use of derivative instruments has been part of the broader phenomenon of securitization of financial markets, and has been part of the globalization of financial markets. The underlying logic of securitization is to allow investors and borrowers to more accurately control risk exposure, leading to broader dispersion of risk, and at least theoretically, if designed correctly, should help to produce greater efficiency in financial markets and enhance stability’.

NO DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN ON- AND OFF THE BOOKS
Yes, but Mr Lipsky, this is all supposed to happen ON THE BOOKS, ON-BALANCE SHEET, NOT OFF-BALANCE SHEET. You speak, like Mr Paulson, with a forked tongue. The reason that the entire world stands at the brink of a financial and economic catastrophe with no historical parallel is that the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, the Bank for International Settlements, the Group of Seven and its Financial Action Task Force (FATF) which the Bush II Administration procured to be ignored when it came to office, the toothless OECD anti-money-laundering initiatives, the corrupt European Commission and its structures, and the implicated national governments and their tax and compliance authorities, have generally and specifically permitted these transactions to proliferate off the books, with the assistance of ‘special zones’ such as Dubai (constructed inter alia from the leveraged proceeds of Ambassador Wanta’s stolen funds). Therefore, all official talk, such as Mr Lipsky’s response to the questioner and Sr. de Rato’s non-response to this Editor’s question, MISS THE POINT.

Such official responses, like the cynical remarks by Mr Paulson cited at the beginning of this report, describe the situation AS IT SHOULD BE, but ALWAYS without making it clear that it makes no sense to have two international financial systems – an orderly, appropriately policed system, and an uncontrolled, wayward, illicit, corrupt, untaxed, secret off-the-books financial system, which by definition and practice corrodes the integrity of the formal financial system. THAT IS WHAT THESE OFFICIALS DISGUISE IN THEIR PUBLIC STATEMENTS, while uttering platitudes about what ‘ought to be’, for the benefit of financial journalists such as the Editor of this service who ask the awkward questions that they cannot answer BECAUSE THEY THEMSELVES ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM.

G-7 POWERS REFER TO THE NEW ‘UNIFORM’ BANKING SYSTEM
Even so, the Group of Seven Finance Ministers themselves left clues in their public pronouncements during the IMF/World Bank Annual meetings that made it clear that the new global financial system is going ahead, whether the Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund understands that it is based and predicated upon implementation of The Wanta Plan, or not.

Specifically, in the course of their deliberations, the G-7 finance leaders endorsed, according to Reuters, ‘a broad reform agenda for the financial sector in the wake of the subprime crisis [sic] that called on banks to improve stress-testing and fortify access to funding in times of trouble. The IMF External Relations Department’s summary of the Reuters report (the IMF’s standard practice is to cite outside press reports about developments taking place within its own buildings) continued:

‘Finance Ministers and central bankers from the G-7 rich nations endorsed a top-level report – expected to set the agenda for regulatory improvements through next year – that appeared to spare hedge funds and [to] focus instead on banks, complex financial instruments and credit ratings agencies. “We expect market participants to address many of the shortcomings that were exposed by recent events”, the G-7 said in its communiqué, increasing the pressure on credit rating agencies and banks to remedy some of the root causes of the crisis. The report was done by the Financial Stability Forum, a group of central banks, regulators and bodies like the IMF’.

NEW ‘’UNIFORM’ SYSTEM WILL HAVE A HEDGE FUND HOLE
Thus the ‘hole’ in the new ON THE BOOKS financial system, represented by the wayward hedge fund sector, which provides conduits and supposed safe havens for illegitimate assets generated from leveraged and hypothecated transactions based inter alia originally upon Ambassador Wanta’s stolen and diverted funds, is to remain unfilled – so that the illicit assets accumulated offshore can continue to be collectivised by hedge funds and transferred in disguise onto the books, to comply with the requirements of the new ‘uniform’ financial system.

By which is supposed to be meant a single-tier system that is not undermined by a second, parallel, hidden, duplicated, lawless, wayward, off-the-books, tax-free offshore system, as at present: a single-tier system that will be kick-started by the delayed implementation of The Wanta Plan, following economic receipt by Ambassador Wanta’s AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., of the $4.5 trillion funds remitted in May 2006 in good faith by the People’s Bank of China, being proceeds accumulated by Leo Wanta and his subsequently assassinated partner, the Chinese intelligence chief, Howe Kwong Kok, which were held faithfully in trust by the Chinese authorities during the long years of the Ambassador’s illegal incarceration, house arrest and probation, on a trumped-up civil tax assessment orchestrated by the ‘Box Gang’ (the Bush-Clinton organized crime clique), as described in these reports.

WANTA PLAN IS TRANSPARENT, CLEAN AND HONEST
As should be crystal clear by now, the whole point of The Wanta Plan, and of the transparent stance consistently adopted by Ambassador Wanta and his Treasurer and Executive Vice President, Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., is to kick-start, validate, energise and provide the nucleus of the new, ‘uniform’ global financial system, in which financial transactions will be conducted on-balance sheet and will be taxed accordingly. One crucial consequence of this will be that the US Treasury will receive not only the illegally and corruptly delayed initial windfall tax payment of $1.575 trillion (35% of $4.5 trillion), but will also benefit from prospective tax accruals (all paid into a special US Treasury tax account, not diverted via the unreliable Internal Revenue Service which has failed to enforce its tax collection remit properly) of the order of up to $200 billion per banking day.

These real’ accruals will be available for paying down the US Treasury’s massive background debt (aggregating over $9.0 trillion as publicised, but which is in reality of a much larger order of magnitude, as has consistently been explained in our financial publications), and for the reduction of taxes, the prospective abolition of inheritance tax, and for long overdue infrastructure and other neglected projects.

Between six and eight large financial institutions have been standing by ever since Henry M. Paulson Jr, first hijacked the Wanta payment, thereby illegally interfering with a private transaction contrary to H.R. 3723 signed by President Clinton on 11th October 1996, preventing a taxpayer from paying his taxes – which is a serious criminal offence – and providing the basis for the ‘privileged’ closed shop of large US institutions led by Goldman Sachs, Citibank, Bank of New York Mellon, Wachovia et al, to conduct illicit hypothecation transactions using the Ambassador’s funds without his authority. The fact that some of these institutions may include those which have been illegally exploiting the Ambassador’s funds represents just another illustration of the fundamental principal that governs the behaviour of this perverse Luciferian elite: their double-mindedness.

FEATURES OF THE NEW SYSTEM TO BE DETERMINED
The following features of the new ‘uniform’ global financial system that is to be kick-started and energised by The Wanta Plan, approved enthusiastically by the Group of Seven (8) meeting in Germany last June (which, presumably, Sr Rodrigo de Rato slept through), need to be clarified (and may be clarified already, unknown to the Editor of this service):

• Is there going to be a new on-balance sheet trading program using US dollars and Euros, and will this new trading program negate the off-balance sheet funds?

• What are the new financial instruments that will be used in the new trading program?

• Are there enough creditworthy banks, domestically (in the United States) and internationally, to facilitate the intended new trading program?

THE MANDAMUS CASE AND THE O.N.I. JUDGE
Turning now to the Mandamus Petition Court case in the United States Eastern District of Virginia on 19th October 2007, which the Editor attended, the Judge was His Honor T. Selby Ellis III, born in Bogotá, Colombia, educated in law at Oxford University, who was appointed by President Reagan in 1987 and has flown F4 Phantom warplanes off aircraft carriers. This enterprising Judge, a naval aviation expert who continues to fly, was a partner with the law firm of Hunton and Williams, based in its Washington DC office. This firm is a well-known CIA legal outfit and, given his naval aviation background, it may be assumed that His Honor may be nothing less than an Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) operative. He became a Senior Federal Judge in the Eastern District of Virginia in April 2007, is authorised to sit for the United States Western District of Virginia as well, and serves in the US Court of Appeal for the Fourth District. He presided in the case of John Walker Lindh.

While waiting for the Ambassador’s case to be heard, we were treated by the Judge to lectures on the choices that those appearing before him had made in their lives, witnessing a drug dealer who received a sentence of 180 months’ incarceration (15 years), and a drug victim who received a remarkably lenient sentence, since she was clearly a victim of this vicious evil. We also heard the Judge’s argumentation as to why a firm of lawyers could not be granted their claim of nearly half a million dollars in legal fees, with the Judge asserting that ‘a lawyer’s job is to solve his client’s problem’ – not to milk him for colossal legal fees that are out of all proportion to the legal result achieved. Bear this in mind when reviewing what follows.

AN O.N.I. COLONEL ATTACHES HIMSELF UNINVITED
On 18th October, the Principals were unexpectedly joined at the well-known CIA hotel Embassy Suites, in Alexandria, VA, beneath the shadow of the biggest pagan, Luciferian temple on earth, the Masonic Temple (of Satan), by the ONI operative whose services were employed in serving the Mandamus documents. He was not invited, but appeared at the last moment, obtaining a room in the same hotel despite the fact that it was full, not least because it was IMF/World Bank Annual Meetings weekend.

It was in the front area of an ‘Agency’ hotel somewhat more up-market than this one that President Reagan was shot, that the Clintons had a blazing row in the elevator prior to William Jefferson Clinton’s inauguration, and that Hillary Rodinsky Clinton attacked the future President of the United States with a lampshade, on the same occasion. It is a certainty that Ambassador Wanta’s hotel accommodation was bugged – with cameras in the television set, chips in the lamps, and other sordid espionage devices with which the CIA is in the habit of spying on its own personnel and on operatives belonging to other agencies under its purview, such as the Office of Naval Intelligence. The reason why the Ambassador and Mr Cottrell booked at the CIA-infested Embassy Suites, close to the Alexandria Courthouse, is that because the Principals have nothing to hide, they are content for the criminal cadres to be aware of this reality at all times.

FEARSOME REPUTATION AS A RUTHLESS ASSASSIN
When the Editor of this service joined the Principals for dinner on the evening of 18th October, the third member of the party was the aforementioned ONI operative, whose fearsome reputation as an assassin was well known to the Editor of this service. However the Editor, having never met him before, did not know who he was until ice cream a la mode time. Having expressed astonishment, the Editor was immediately warned by this operative never to reveal that he had been present. The warning was accompanied by a light-hearted threat, but knowing how dangerous this man really is, the Editor took note of the fact. It was repeated on three further occasions on the following day – on the third occasion with the addendum that ‘if you do, I will send someone after you’

The ONI operative who had inserted himself into the Ambassador’s presence later not only accompanied us to the Courthouse but provided transport as well. The evidence suggests that he orchestrated the entire Mandamus charade with the Courthouse.

EMBASSY SUITES ROOM IS ENTERED WHILE WE RE IN COURT
After Ambassador Wanta had testified pro-se, during the lunch break, the operative – who, in an extraordinary breach of protocol, had walked right up to the Judge’s podium and had spoken privately to the Clerk of the Court – shuttled the party back to the hotel, where Michael Cottrell discovered that his hotel keys were missing. We also noticed four FBI agents in the lobby. The party returned to the Courthouse at 1.30pm, but the ONI operative, asserting the need to park the car back in the hotel’s car park (whereas it could perfectly well have been parked more locally), absented himself on the pretext of parking the car back at the hotel. During the afternoon session, we believe that the hotel room was cased by the FBI operatives, who accessed the room using Mr Cottrell’s stolen key. They would have been engaged in extracting data from the hidden cameras and audio facilities, photographing documents, and making such other clandestine arrangements as the spooks considered necessary, as they cast about desperately to find ‘evidence’ against the Principals, and possibly even the Editor of this service.

At six minutes before 2.00pm, the Judge, who had been taking a drink driving case, suddenly ordered a recess and entered his chambers. It is believed that during this brief recess, the Judge may have taken calls from authorities, the burden of which may have been: ‘Close down this case as quickly and smoothly as possible’.

Outside the Courtroom, Ambassador Wanta, having noted that the Assistant US Attorney’s name was Leslie McClendon, introduced himself to this lady, who charmingly confirmed that she was the granddaughter of the famous late columnist Sarah McClendon, the senior veteran White House correspondent whose speciality for decades had been the exposure of official corruption in general, and exposure of Leo Wanta’s case in particular.

ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY RELATED TO WANTA JOURNALIST
So here was the Assistant US Attorney, the granddaughter of the United States’ most renowned anti-corruption campaigner, participating in an orchestrated, rearguard kangaroo court operation, fronted by the ONI, to frustrate the Ambassador’s exposure of the worst case of official financial corruption in US and world history. Charming and friendly though this Assistant US Attorney was, she had failed to recuse herself, given the obvious conflict of interest, since the late Sarah McClendon. had published a large number of well-known articles on Leo Wanta, as any Google search will immediately confirm.

(Type in Sarah McClendon articles on Leo Wanta, and 210 references will appear).

CONSPIRACY TO DEPRIVE WANTA OF COURT DOCUMENTS
Separately, it may be recalled that the Ambassador never received any documents arising from his Petition for a Writ of Mandamus, during the two months from the filing (by the aforementioned ONI operative on behalf of the Ambassador, who points out that ‘it is sometimes necessary to use bad people to do good things’) of the Summonses and Returns of Service at the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria, on 27th July 2007. During the 60 days during which the Ambassador was cynically kept in the dark, despite repeated telephone enquiries at the law offices of Steven Goodwin in Richmond, VA, the Ambassador and his colleague Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., were denied all knowledge of any responses by the Respondents, namely Henry M. Paulson Jr., the US Treasury Secretary, Robert M. Kimmit, Deputy Secretary of the Treasury, James R Wilkinson, Treasury Chief of Staff, Michael Chertoff, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Alberto R. Gonzales, the former US Attorney General, who has links with organized crime, and the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. No explanations for this state of affairs were ever forthcoming from the office of Steven Goodwin who, by the way, remains the Trustee of this Editor’s two-year $35,000 loan, repayable at 7.5% annual interest to the Editor on 10th June 2007.

GOODWIN’S LAST-MINUTE AFFIDAVIT TO THE COURT
Instead, Mr Goodwin furnished the Court with the following Affidavit, which was filed shortly before the hearing, on 19th October 2007:

AFFIDAVIT
Comes now the Affiant and, having been duly sworn, says the following:

The address at 5516 Falmouth Street, Suite 108, Richmond, Virginia 23230 is occupied by the law firm of Goodwin, Sutton & DuVal, PLC.

I am a principal in the firm of Goodwin, Sutton & DuVal, PLC.

I am aware of the name Leo E. Wanta and AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. as is my staff, and I have performed various legal services for both in the past.

I am the registered agent for AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.

My staff obtains the mail at 5516 Falmouth Street, Suite 108, Richmond, Virginia 23230 and distributes the mail within the firm daily.

Mr Wanta had advised me that he had filed action in Federal Court in Alexandria and advised that mail pertaining to that case may be coming to the office.

No one from my staff has made me aware of any mail from the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond received on behalf of Mr Wanta or AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., in the matter of Wanta, et al v. Paulson, et al.

I am aware that my office has received mail from the United States Attorney’s office on behalf of Mr Wanta and/or AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. in the matter of Wanta, et al v. Paulson, et al.

STATE OF VIRGINIA, COUNTY OF HENRICO, to-wit: [signed, Affiant]
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this 18th day of October, 2007, by Steven D. Goodwin: [Signed] Notary Public, Aimee L. Angell’.

In the penultimate paragraph of this last-minute Affidavit (Mr Goodwin did not show up, of course), reference is made to mail from the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. This represents a crude deception on the part of Steven Goodwin. Defendants in court cases do not write to the Plaintiffs, and vice versa, as Mr Goodwin should surely be aware.

GOODWIN IN GROSS DERELICTION OF HIS DUTY
For reasons that are explained by this narrative, the mail that Attorney Steven Goodwin, who is a Director of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., received in this legal connection was never forwarded to Ambassador Wanta or to Mr Cottrell, and Mr Goodwin chose not to inform them about it. In various phone calls with the Principals, Goodwin had referred to the ONI operative, who appears to have orchestrated this entire charade, by his formal title of ‘Colonel’, implying that he may have been taking instructions from him, rather than carrying out his ongoing responsibilities both as a Director and as an Attorney from time to time for Leo Wanta. Even if he were to try to argue that he was ‘not instructed’ in this matter, his responsibilities as Director obliged him to act at all times in the interests of the corporation and his co-directors; while as a lawyer he ought to be motivated by the Judge’s own dictum that ‘a lawyer’s job is to solve his client’s problem’. On both these counts, Mr Goodwin’s behaviour and performance were a disgrace.

CLERK OF THE COURT MAKES HER OWN FEEBLE EXCUSES
During the lunch recess on 19th October, the Editor and colleagues noticed that the female Clerk of the Court, who of course was not sworn, was engaged in an animated discussion with the Assistant US Attorney and associates with Counsel for the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond concerning the labels that her system prints out when mailing papers from the Court’s premises. Having stressed that the address labels carry the same addresses as that of the Petitioners and Respondents, the Clerk approached the Editor and colleagues. The Editor stated loudly that irrespective of what she was saying, the Ambassador never received any of the documentation. The Clerk, who also admitted having failed to scan in the Ambassador’s latest Motion, appears to have been engaged in an obfuscation exercise to mask any interference with due process, and the episode appears to have been designed to absolve the Court itself from participation in conspiracy to frustrate the course of justice and to create a prejudicial environment for the Ambassador.

THE SABOTAGING OF DUE PROCESS
On 7th September, the Court had therefore dismissed Ambassador Wanta’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus against the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond without the Ambassador’s knowledge. As soon as he became belatedly aware of this fact, he filed a Motion with the Court to vacate the Order of the Court granting the motion to dismiss in favour of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and against the Petitioner.

This Motion included the following paragraphs:

• 9. On multiple instances between the time the captioned matter was initially filed by the Petitioner and the time the presently pending Federal Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss was received by the registered agent office the Petitioner called the registered agent office many times to determine if any mail had been received in the name of the Petitioner(s).

• 10. Petitioner represents that at no time, prior to the Petitioner being advised of the Motion to Dismiss having been filed by the Federal Respondents and received at the registered agent office, had the Petitioner been advised of any mail being received for the Petitioner at the registered agent office.

• 11. The Petitioner… has not received in the United States mail and/or otherwise, either the Motion, Brief in support of the Motion and/or the Order of the Court and/or any other documents filed by the Federal Reserve Respondents in the captioned case.

• 12. The failure of the Petitioner to receive notice of a Motion or other Court filing creates a prejudicial environment. The principal test for prejudice is whether the “non-noticed party” was denied a fair opportunity to defend and to offer additional evidence on a different theory.

YET THE O.N.I. JUDGE CONFIRMED THE FRUSTRATION
Notwithstanding this blatant frustration of the course of justice and interference with due process, Judge T. S. Ellis III, who had treated the court to intellectual argumentation as to the difference between right and wrong, and between the choices people have to make in the course of their lives, dismissed Ambassador Wanta’s Motion out of hand, thereby confirming that blatant, deliberate, cynical and instrumental legal trickery designed to frustrate the course of justice may be perfectly Okay with His Honor, after all.

PERTINENT FACTS PLACED IN THE LEGAL PUBLIC DOMAIN
Ambassador Wanta’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus filed against Henry M. Paulson, Jr. et al [see full text in our report dated DATE] placed into the legal public domain (as opposed to the public domain generally, epitomised by our reports on this website), the background to Leo Wanta’s claim for economic receipt of the money paid to him personally in a private transaction by the Chinese central bank in May 2006, only to be hijacked, to the fury of the Chinese themselves, by the corrupt US Treasury Secretary, Henry M. Paulson Jr.

It stated, in paragraph 4, that:

‘Petitioner has attempted to access monies that were transferred through international bank monetary clearing systems to financial institutions located in the United States of America. The remitting party was the People’s Republic of China, People’s Bank. The remitting party designated that the transferred funds were for the sole and exclusive benefit of Petitioner. The foreign entity that originated the inward remittance designated Petitioner as sole and exclusive recipient for the transferred money/financial instruments’.

‘Irrespective of efforts proffered by Petitioner and/or agents and representatives of Petitioner, private and public individuals and entities prevent petitioner from exercising Petitioner’s legal right to the use, transfer and unrestricted ability to freely disburse said financial assets. The acts and/or omissions to act by named and unnamed Respondents prevent the Petitioner (and others who are ancillary to this cause of action) from paying their respective tax liabilities to both State and Federal taxing auithorities’.

JUDGE GERALD BRUCE LEE’S MEMORANDUM OPINION
The Ambassador referenced the Memorandum Opinion handed down by Judge Gerald Bruce Lee in case number 02-1363-A on 15th April 2003, in which the Court stated that the Plaintiff (Ambassador Leo Wanta) ‘should pursue liquidation of [his offshore Title 18, Section 6 USG intelligence] corporations, recovery of financial assets and pay all required taxes in accordance with the law’.

Specifically, Judge Gerald Bruce Lee adjudicated that ’Plaintiff’s sole remedy in this matter is to proceed with the liquidation of the corporations and report these transactions to the Internal Revenue Service in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code and then challenge the assessment of taxes in a refund proceeding’. With this statement, Judge Gerald Bruce Lee acknowledged Ambassador Leo Wanta’s sole ownership as Principal of the funds and assets in question – a stance reiterated in the Response filed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and heard by Judge Ellis without Ambassador Wanta’s knowledge on 7th September, wherein the Richmond Fed suggested that the remedy for the Ambassador lies within the Jurisdiction of the United States Eastern District Court of New York.

In so doing, of course, the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond acknowledged the Ambassador’s claim, as we pointed out in our report on Citibank’s criminal behaviour dated 4th October: see Archive. This report was ‘snipped’ by criminal US intelligence because it characterises Citibank as a criminal enterprise. By ‘snipping’ this report, therefore, the NSA revealed that it works for Citibank or that Citibank can procure the services of the NSA to interfere illegally with a foreign website, in order to cover up the truth: that Citibank, in the Wantagate context, is indeed a criminal enterprise. Fancy drawing attention to the fact that this is true, by ‘snipping’ the text, from the point where we state that Citibank acknowledges that it holds/held the Wanta funds illegally!

FURTHER WANTA INFORMATION PLACED ON THE RECORD
At the hearing attended by the Editor of this service on 19th October, Judge Ellis, having heard the Ambassador place onto the record a substantial amount of condensed information about the operations in which he had been engaged on behalf of President Reagan, along with a detailed explanation of the source of his Title 18 Section 6 corporate assets and funds, returned from the brief recess ordered at six minutes before 2.00pm, and proceeded to deny the Ambassador’s case ‘for lack of subject matter jurisdiction’.

Having denied a lawyer her firm’s fees of half a million dollars, on the basis that ‘a lawyer’s job is to solve his client’s problem’ and to provide value for money, the Judge dismissed the Ambassador’s case on the basis that his Court lacked jurisdiction, which could have been ascertained from the outset – thereby saving the Ambassador prospective lawyer’s fees and wasting his valuable time, not to mention that of the Court and everyone else involved. Either a Court has jurisdiction or it hasn’t. To allow the matter to be taken to such lengths (indeed, to any lengths at all), without reviewing at the outset whether the Judge has jurisdiction, only to have it dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, is a grotesque abuse of the legal process that is consistent with the apparent manipulation of the entire operation by the Office of Naval Intelligence, which this editor considers to be a criminal organisation.

COURT INSERTS SEPARATE DRUG CASE INTO WANTA’S RECORD
To add insult to injury, the Court has corruptly procured the insertion of details concerning an unconnected drug-trafficking case that the Principals and the Editor sat through on 19th October, into the record of Ambassador Wanta’s hearing on that date. This was revealed when Attorney Thomas Henry attempted to retrieve the record of the Ambassador’s testimony before the Court, from the Court’s records. To this deliberate, malevolent and thoroughly evil sabotage of the public record is therefore added the hideous sin of false witness, given that this outrage represents a repulsive attempt to smear the Ambassador’s reputation with details of a drug-trafficking case heard on the same day (to which we were witnesses), in which the offender was sentenced to 180 months’ imprisonment. In other words, the Court has retrospectively attempted to smear the Ambassador by inserting this drug-dealing information, the intention being that when this is drawn to their attention, the Court’s staff will turn round and claim that it was a ‘clerical error’.

IMPOSTOR O.N.I. OPERATIVE PULLS DOWN HIS PANTS
On returning to the hotel following the case on the Friday afternoon, the uninvited ONI operative, who was by now an impostor, performed a number of further tricks. First, although an uninvited guest in the Ambassador’s hotel suite, he suddenly undressed (took down his pants) in the presence of the Ambassador, Michael C. Cottrell and the Editor of this service exposing himself in his vest and underpants. He behaved in this outrageous fashion without asking permission, let alone asking whether he could change his clothes in the bathroom. While undressing and exhibiting himself in his underpants, this ONI Colonel stated that he had to change into his formal attire because he had to ‘go to C Street’. This was a reference to a CIA location, where of course he would be delivering the proceeds of his espionage and frame-up operations against the Ambassador, Michael C. Cottrell and the Editor of this service.

THE PHOTO FRAME-UP IN THE BASEMENT CAR PARK
The three of us noted this display of exhibitionism with inward disgust. After he had put on his alternative trousers and jacket, the ONI Colonel asked the Editor to accompany him down to the basement car park area, where he would extract two business cards – one with his bona fide address, and the other displaying a front entity which he lightly referred to as being his ‘legitimate’ business. On his way down to the car park, the Editor realized that he might be murdered there, since car parks are places where these people are in the habit of liquidating their enemies. Having opened the boot of his car, extracted the business cards (which later vanished), he closed the portfolio from which he had extracted them, shook hands and said goodbye. It did not occur to the Editor until later that this operation had of course been filmed by two CIA creeps hiding behind pillars in the car park.

Subsequently, Mr Cottrell informed the Editor that the ONI Colonel had also separately invited him down to the car park basement as well, and had pulled papers out of the boot, handed them to him, and then removed them from him. In this instance, Mr Cottrell noted the presence of two men, one of whom had a curious piece of clothing round his midriff which plainly concealed a camera. Therefore, this charade was filmed.

THE O.N.I. ASSASSIN’S DIRTY TRICKS EXPOSED
No doubt the sequence in which the ONI Colonel removed his clothes was filmed by a device in the room, probably the TV set, as well. Memories of cynical frame-up tricks played against Senator Larry Craig recently, surfaced in the Editor’s mind. A knowledgeable US friend of the Editor’s also pointed out, in a phone call placed by the Editor from the IMF Press Room, that hotel keys (especially at such a CIA establishment) routinely contain all kinds of data, such as the hotel guest’s credit card details, and that one should always take a pair of scissors and cut the key up in front of the hotel staff. To do the job properly, one should see which trash bin the staff use for discarded materials, and ensure that the pieces of the hotel key are discarded elsewhere.

THE ASSASSIN DEMANDS MONEY WITH THREATS
That was not all. On Sunday afternoon of 21st October, 2007, the impostor ONI Colonel, spying and plotting against us on behalf of the ONI and the CIA, telephoned Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. in the Alexandria hotel suite. The Editor was present when this call was taken. In the course of the conversation, the ONI Colonel, who is a notorious assassin, shouted: ‘You owe me’ down the line. When the tenor of Mr Cottrell’s response did not meet with his approval, this operative said words to the effect: ’I suppose I’ll have to sling my gun again’.

The greater probability is that he will be arrested.

Separately, the ONI Colonel professed to have been unaware of the fact that the Editor was the source of the $35,000 which paid the extortion money to the Wisconsin Department of Corrections on 21st July 2005 for (illegal) ‘restitution’ and for the illegal payment of a Wisconsin Public Defender contrary to law and to the Ambassador’s right to appoint his own defence counsel – even though the Richmond-based ONI Colonel knows Richmond-based Attorney Steven Goodwin, who is the Trustee of the Editor’s loan funds as reiterated above, and has undoubtedly coordinated the entire Mandamus charade, given that the Judge is believed to be an ONI operative, the Clerk of the Court appears to have been engaged in outright interference with due process thereby frustrating the course of justice and creating, with the apparent assistance of Steven Goodwin and/or his office staff, a prejudicial environment for the Ambassador.

THEY THINK WE ARE TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND
It needs to be asked: are these people all as stoned and stupid as they behave? Do they seriously imagine that figures with the intellect, capabilities and resources of the Principals, would be incapable of deconstructing what has been going on? And are they so foolish as to imagine that the Editor of this service would lack the spine to expose the sordid, criminal and offensive antics of these US operatives whose sole purpose here was to frustrate and obstruct the course of justice?

As in all such cases all over the United States, these criminals are blinded by their Black power to such an extent that they are prepared to take ridiculous risks in order to achieve their objectives. Clearly, the ONI Colonel and assassin imagined that the Editor would not expose this scandal; that the Editor would, as a consequence of the meeting, be in fear of his life, given that the ONI assassin stated that ‘if you expose me, I’ll send someone after you’. In this report, the Editor has refrained from giving this ONI murderer the satisfaction of seeing his name in print. But all ‘the interested’ will no doubt know his identity – and, one assumes, will take the appropriate measures to ensure that he is not permitted to carry out his crude separate threats against Michael C. Cottrell and the Editor of this service.

OBJECTIVES OF THE O.N.I. COLONEL’S INTERVENTIONS
What was the object of this shambolic, botched US counterintelligence exercise against the Principals and the Editor? Try blackmail. By photographing the Editor receiving his unwanted business cards in the basement car park, and by separately photographing Michael C. Cottrell receiving documents ditto, the intention will have been to be in a position to fabricate a bribery offensive, or to allege that the Editor is engaged in espionage, which is of course nonsense, not least because the Editor is not an agent for a foreign power but is exactly what he says he is and has always been, and nothing else. As for the undressing episode, although there was no mirror present in the main suite area in which this ONI assassin undressed in the presence of the distinguished company, a camera chip set inside the TV screen may have been activated, although this seems somewhat implausible since the ONI Colonel himself would be implicated in whatever sordid plans ‘C Street’ may have been inclined to develop.

We imagine that this exposure will make the brainless or drugged idiots at ‘C Street’ think twice before perpetrating crude counterintelligence operations for financial gain like this on bona fide businessmen in the future. On second thoughts, no we don’t. The Office of Naval Intelligence have been intermeddling in Leo Wanta’s legitimate affairs, with extreme malevolent intent, for many years: and they continue with their criminal intent. It is high time these assassins (which is what many of them are) were brought under control, or abolished.

THE AMBASSADOR DESCRIBES HIS TIME IN THE GULAG
During the Editor’s conversations with the Ambassador in Alexandria, Leo Wanta divulged horrendous details of his experiences in the US GULAG, which will form the first chapter of the Editor’s intended book on Wantagate, the purpose of which will be to expose as much of the truth as can be published given the usual constraints, and to stamp once and for all on the criminal disinformation that has been spun against the Ambassador for years. All these lies were predicated upon the single base lie – that Leo Emil Wanta was dead. Since he ceased to be dead, these lies have all been exposed. However some lies, like rattlesnakes, require heavier and repeated blows to the serpent’s head – which is what the Editor’s Wantagate book will provide.

Leo Wanta described to the Editor and to Mr Cottrell what happened one night when he was lying asleep on his bunk bed in a US GULAG jail. The door burst open (which cannot happen without the cooperation of the prison guards) and three thugs attacked the Ambassador with brutal blows to the head and body. He managed to fight back, even though he had been asleep when they burst in, and gradually somehow gained the upper hand. The guards had deliberately spread the lie that he is homosexual (false witness), which motivated these thugs to ‘do their thing’. When this and other murder attempts failed, a Deputy Sheriff arrived unannounced, changed into prisoners’ clothing, appeared in the washroom, and attempted to murder the Ambassador near the toilets. When he failed, he fled, as we have previously reported, back to the administration area, changed back into his official garb, and escaped in his county car.

GETTING TO THE LIBRARY WITHOUT BEING ASSAULTED
In answer to the Editor’s question: ‘How did you manage to get through each day?’ Leo replied that he said his prayers when he could find a brief respite and that his main preoccupation every day was to get to the library without being attacked along the way. He said that, when on his way to the library, prison thugs were often waiting for him round corners, ready to commit assault, for which they appeared to have complete impunity. The Ambassador said that although not even the library was safe, at least he could bury his head behind a newspaper and thereby obtain some minutes of comparative peace and quiet. And bear in mind that the original cynical and ruthless intention of the Clinton-Bush ‘Box Gang’ and their co-conspirators (who are now in a state of extreme agitation at the turn of events) was to have him jailed for 22 years. All on a trumped-up charge of having not paid a State civil tax assessment of $14,129 that he never owed, but which he and his subsequently assassinated Chinese partner Howe Kwong Kok, paid twice (in May and June 1992), for which an Outagamie County Court-certified and notarised Satisfaction of Delinquent Tax Warrant dated 1st June 1993 exists and is in the Editor’s possession, and which this Editor paid a third time via his loan of $35,000 paid in person by Trustee Steven Goodwin on 21st July 2005 (for details, see our ‘Wisconsingate’ posting dated 6th August 2007).

147 INTERPOL AGENTS AND MASS ARRESTS OF BANKERS
On Tuesday 23rd October it became known, from several sources, that 147 Interpol agents were present in the United States. By the early evening of the same date, the Editor gathered that a large number of individuals had been arrested in both Europe and the United States – far more, in one sweep, than on any of the multiple earlier occasions.

Arrests of bankers and holders of high office have been reported by reliable sources ever since last December, when Henry M. Paulson Jr. was arrested in Germany, as confirmed by this service. He was exfiltrated from a German piston by British agents and flown in a British aircraft to Washington, where he was dumped at the Washington Cathedral just in time to enjoy the extended dirge for the late President and pornographer Gerald Ford.

PATTERN OF ARRESTS SINCE PAULSON LAST DECEMBER
Successive waves of arrests have been reported to us from multiple sources on and off ever since, especially from the summer months onwards. On about 10th June, Dr Alan Greenspan was arrested and is believed to have remained incarcerated for up to three weeks – although none of this would have been known to the complacent bankers and others who attended, by invitation, the Per Jacobsen Lecture, given by Greenspan on Sunday 21st October, amid security so tight that two lines of armed police stretched along Pennsylvania Avenue almost from the corner of IMF Building HQ2, to the International Finance Corporation (IFC) building, where the great man, who tried to steal $3 trillion and was thrown into jail in June this year, was giving the invited guests the benefit of his double-mindedness.

In mid-July 2007, the former Governor of the Bank of England, Lord (‘Eddie’) George was also arrested, having been caught in flagrante interfering with international financial operations intended to procure the Wanta Settlement. Subsequently we received multiple reports from informed sources of high-level arrests. An impeccable serving military source stated on 18th October that ‘since February 27, 2007, Cheney has been intermittently confined from time to time. On that date, in Australia, he was taken into custody by a detached element of US special forces, and there was a shoot-out’. This US military statement confirms detailed reports, which surfaced last spring, to the effect that a shoot-out occurred at the airport in Sydney, in the course of which three personnel were killed.

The Editor has been told that there has indeed been a pattern of arrests and releases of top officials, with Vice President Cheney arrested a number of times, and others, including Michael Chertoff (whose name, in Russian, means ‘Little Devil’), the Homeland Security Secretary, being mentioned in this context. Some of these reports have only been sustained by a single source, but in other cases the separate sources have been multiple (as many as six in one instance). According to a recent report, arresting personnel caught Cheney, while ‘confined’, interfering with a banking transaction, and whacked him behind the knees, with the warning that ‘next time, we’ll hit your face’.

THE QUEEN’S GOLD IS RESTORED TO HER MAJESTY
On 17th October 2007, ownership of The Queen’s gold, stolen by these US criminals with insider assistance at the corrupt Bank of England, was finally restored to her. It is not known whether Her Majesty was paid compound interest for the period since 29-30 March, when the gold was stolen during a British banking blackout. When taking leave of Her Majesty on resigning as Prime Minister on 27th June, The Queen told Mr Blair, in an audience lasting for 25 minutes, that she held him personally responsible for the return of her gold. This criminal intelligence operative, for whom an International Court of Justice arrest warrant was issued earlier this year as we reported, has not only been let off the hook by his Illuminati controllers, who rustled up a non-job with diplomatic status in the Middle East to provide him with protection against arrest, but has been selected by the corrupt European Union as its preferred candidate for the first EU President, under the so-called European Reform Treaty. This is almost identical to the European Constitution Treaty that the Dutch and French electorates both rejected, and which will finally submerge the European nation states into the Greater Germany planned by the Madrid-based German Geopolitical Centre set up by the Nazis in 1942, and implemented by the successor to the Abwehr, the secret German ‘Black’ intelligence and long-range strategic deception agency, Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst, based in Dachau, near Munich.

BROWN BACKS CRIMINAL BLAIR FOR THE E.U. PRESIDENCY
Even Blair’s successor, Gordon Brown, backed the former British Prime Minister’s candidacy for EU President, commenting on 19th October that Blair would be a ‘great candidate’ to become EU boss. Our intelligence sources say that Brown’s handlers have told him that his earlier ambivalence (secret dislike) of the European Union was unacceptable, and that he would have to do as he is told with regard to the unpopular policy which ties Britain to the corrupt European Union, ‘or else’. The fact that the British people as a whole rightly have no time for the European Union and would greatly prefer to get out as soon as possible, is of course neither here nor there, since ‘democracy’ is considered by the World Revolutionaries to represent merely an annoying ‘staging post’ towards the mad objective of World Dictatorship by the corrupt and criminal élite, who ‘know best’ what is good for the Rest of Us.

When Gordon Brown, as incoming Prime Minister appeared at the Palace on 27th June, he was with The Queen for the unprecedentedly long period of 55 minutes. It is believed that The Queen spoke about the urgent necessity for her stolen gold to be restored without further ado.

WE CALLED FOR THE U.S. AMBASSADOR TO BE EXPELLED
Against the background of the theft of The Queen’s gold, the Editor of this service called for the American Ambassador to be ordered to leave his Embassy and to return in 30 days with the matter resolved. Should he fail to do so, the Editor recommended that the Embassy staff should be kicked out of London sine die, and that if the matter was not then resolved to The Queen’s complete satisfaction within three months, the Americans should be ordered to close and vacate their military bases on British soil, with the understanding that they would not be invited back until such time as they had purged the corruption from their rotten political and financial systems.

THE ON-OFF EMBARGO AGAINST THE UNITED STATES
In the event, the international community took the point, but resolved to address the stealing of The Queen’s gold, the diversion and stealing of the Wanta payment, and the purging of the US financial system, by other means. In September it became known that one of the means adopted would be the imposition of an economic embargo against the United States by Britain, Canada and China, which were later allegedly joined by Japan, Germany and Russia. Although German ‘Black’ intelligence (Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst) is behind the world’s major problems, these people draw the line at being defrauded financially, which is where the American organised criminal cadres at the highest levels of the US structures have miscalculated. The threat or de facto actualité of this embargo has been one of many factors that has brought this crisis to a head.

Others have included threats levelled by foreign and domestic law enforcement personnel against both Vice President Cheney and the President of the United States, who, like Cheney, has been leveraging as much off-balance sheet profit for himself as possible, and has vacillated from signing his own resignation papers, to arrogant defiance – depending upon the volume of alcohol, cocaine or all of the above in his blood when he wakes up in the morning. In order to bolster his precarious position and his collapsed standing generally, the President’s preferred stance is to be photographed as Commander-in-Chief, shaking hands with military officers, as on 23rd October when Mr Bush spoke at the National Defense University, and then inspected a parade of officers bin-laden with medals. It is worth remembering that the President of the United States is Commander-in-Chief of the military only – not of the people.

POSSIBLE NUCLEAR BLACKMAIL ON AMERICAN SOIL
By far the most alarming scenario relates to the implications of the missing nuclear device reported to have been ‘lost’ recently somewhere in the United States, which the ‘licensed’ US operative Wayne Madsen has suggested was stolen in order to provide the perpetrators with scope for nuclear blackmail on US soil. What Madsen failed to elaborate was the linkage here with the Wantagate crisis, which he has consistently ignored (thereby revealing that he is an intelligence operative). On 18th October, the Editor sent the following summary to a veteran military and intelligence patriot and lawyer with whom he has corresponded for many months, and who has a perfect grasp of the Wantagate issues:

‘Inform Colonel that we are down in Virginia for the Alexandria Court on Friday in force. I am in New York and will be joining them tomorrow. The Queen got her gold back yesterday, which divided the embargo countries (China, Britain, Canada): very clever. Could Cheney be engaged in nuclear blackmail? You bet. Would this have anything to do with the Wanta Settlement? It is to do with that and nothing else. Has it been spiked? I heard that Chertoff was held in Portland, several days ago. (A major exercise had been scheduled for the Portland area). Does the military realise that these criminals are playing nuclear blackmail on US soil as their leverage to avoid paying the Wanta Settlement? If they don’t (which I doubt), they need to now!’

‘Please inform the Colonel of my views urgently’.

PLANNING A NUKE EXPLOSION TO AVOID PAYING WANTA?
Whether these fears were well founded or not, the ruthlessness of the cornered criminals that we have been having to deal with these past 18 months is undoubtedly such that they would be willing to go to any lengths to get their own way. After all, they were prepared to sacrifice the lives of more than 3,000 people on 9/11, inter alia to procure the destruction of the original copies of a mountain of derivatives contracts held by Cantor Fitzgerald that were falling due imminently for settlement in US dollars. The firm lost 658 of its staff in that abomination. During the chaos, a huge volume of gold was stolen from the underground vaults of Bank of Nova Scotia. After getting away with those atrocities, the idea that a man like Cheney, a former satanic MK-Ultra and Omega controller and operative with close links to organized crime, would cringe at a rogue operation to indulge in nuclear blackmail on US soil in order to create conditions under which Ambassador Wanta’s stolen $4.5 trillion could be retained and not transferred to the Ambassador’s corporate securities account with Morgan Stanley, New York, would be fanciful.

Mercifully, the ‘rogue actors’ mentioned by Mr Paulson in his address before the International Monetary and Financial Committee, were frustrated in any operation that they may have been planning, to perpetrate such a crime against fellow Americans. But the military Colonel’s response to the Editor’s message on this score, received by our veteran intermediary on 19th October was: ‘He is probably correct’.

TWIN CITIES PREDICTION JUDGED TO BE ACCURATE, TOO
It has been acknowledged by several special sources that the Editor was ‘probably correct’ too, about the intended Twin Cities atrocity which we exposed last April. Under that scenario, a nuclear device was to be exploded in the Twin Cities of Minneapolis-St Paul on 1st September 2008 – the (very late) opening date for the pre-election Republican National Convention. Using Kabbalistic Illuminati numerology, that date devolves to 9/11 [September: 9; 1 (first of the month); 2008 = 2+8 = 10; +1 = 11]. Since it is known that these maddened Luciferians have a hang-up about twins, the long-range strategic takeover plan called for a catastrophic atrocity at the beginning of the Bush II reign on 9/11 with the destruction of the Twin Towers, followed at the end of the Bush II reign with a catastrophic abomination in the Twin Cities in the course of which the Republican Party would be destroyed (since it is the actual intention of the Revolution that all parties of the so-called Right’ should cease to exist: indeed Paul Wolfowitz, the disgraced former World Bank President and a senior Illuminati operative, has specifically stated that the Forces of Darkness to which he belongs control both political parties, so it is neither here nor there who wins elections, which are to be abolished, anyway) – providing the pretext for the perpetuation of Bush II under a dictatorship.

LEGAL RECAPITULATION FROM OUR REPORT DATED 30TH AUGUST 2007:
Reiteration of the fraudulent transactions involving Bank of New York Mellon – a bank so arrogant and conspicuously indifferent both to its tarnished reputation and to its grotesque breaches of US law and of N.A.S.D./S.E.C. Regulations, that it now takes first prize in the crowded competition for the title of ‘Most arrogant and corrupt financial institution in America’:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scienter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• ‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON IS IN BREACH AND OF WHICH THE SIX ‘LEVY BANKS’ MAY LIKEWISE BE VARIOUSLY IN BREACH [CREDIT SUISSE, UBS, DEUTSCHE BANK, BANK OF AMERICA, CITIBANK, THE BANK OF ENGLAND]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is in violation of:
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR SIR LEO WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT THE HIGHEST U.S. LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006, AND HAVE CONTINUED THEIR SERIAL CRIMES EVER SINCE:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war

This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Wanta’s funds.

The Directors and others listed in Part 1 of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and others posted on 11th June may likewise be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious violation of the laws itemised above. This list is reproduced in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, September 2007, on pages 163-168.

U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: MISPRISION OF FELONY:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier Wantagate reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

Dr D ‘Butterfly’.

Advertisements

One thought on “BUSH AND CHENEY STEALING WITH, FROM EACH OTHER

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s