GODFATHER BUSH TRIED TO STEAL $4.5 TRILLION WITH RUBIN’S HELP
Wednesday 28 November 2007 03:10
WHEN THE THEFT WAS THWARTED, RUBIN STAYED AWAY AND WAS REPLACED
WILL RUBIN BE ARRESTED WHEN HE RE-ENTERS THE UNITED STATES?
THE NEW INTERIM CITIBANK CEO IS SIR WILLIAM BISCHOFF, FROM LONDON
CITIBANK HAS NOT PAID AMBASSADOR WANTA, CONTRARY TO CIA FABRICATIONS
CITIBANK WILL COLLAPSE ALONG WITH THE DOLLAR IF THIS IS NOT ‘FIXED’
THE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE WHOLE WORLD WILL BE UNSPEAKABLE
SEE OUR REPORT PREDICTING ALL THIS, DATED 2ND SEPTEMBER 2006
WIKED PEDIA (WIKIPEDIA, WICCA PEDIA) SPREADS LIES ABOUT WANTA THAT THE EDITOR CORRECTED, AND HAS REMOVED THE EDITOR’S CORRECTION, LEAVING THE LIES IN PLACE.
THIS CONFIRMS THAT WIKIPEDIA IS AN INSTRUMENT OF THE CIA DISINFORMATION APPARAT.
Note: This OUTRAGE will be exposed in more detail as soon as the Editor has the time available.
‘But thus saith the Lord, Even the captives of the mighty shall be taken away, and the prey of the terrible shall be delivered: for I will contend with him that contendeth with thee, and I will save thy children’. Isaiah, Chapter 49, verse 25.
For background, please see the last two or three Wantagate reports: Archive
By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for ‘Wantagate’ reports since April 2006. [Note: A new panel giving details of our latest publications as they are made available, has been added].
• Please Make a Donation to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing financial global corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial corruption and global financial crisis in history. This website has been calling the shots, because of the hijacking of Wanta’s Settlement.
• The Editor is extremely grateful to the generous Americans and others who have so thoughtfully contributed funds to assist us with these exposures. He has now written to everyone around the world who had contributed by 27th November 2007, to thank them for their generosity.
• Emails addressed to us which lack coordinates identifying the sender will be trashed unread. The Editor publishes all his coordinates, as has always been the case, as he has nothing to hide. Others should do the same. Also, we trash any emails unread that are not ‘on message’.
• It would be appreciated if webmasters would refrain from lifting our material without proper adequate attribution. Manifestly, the material may be used with attribution, but any other use is illegal and unethical. We also protest at people picking at our original research and posted reports, and crediting themselves rather than the Editor/this website.
Such behaviour is particularly prevalent in the United States, where lies are a way of life with some people, and is an example of the kind of dishonesty that we are exposing in these reports.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY: THE EVENTS OF 20TH NOVEMBER 2007
The entire informed international financial world is aware of what happened on 20th November 2007, when the three diplomatic officers of whom two are Directors of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., headed by Ambassador Lee E. Wanta, appeared at the offices of Citibank, 399 Park Avenue, by appointment, to sign the necessary documentation for the release of funds that have been the personal property of the Ambassador since they were originally sent over for his exclusive account by the Chinese authorities in May 2006.
However for the benefit of anyone who may not have read the last three postings on this website, we summarise what happened as follows. When the Ambassador’s small party arrived at the bank’s offices in Midtown New York, they were treated with the crudest discourtesy at once. They asked to see Ferguson, Rhodes and Lava (in that order) and were refused. They asked to be able to sign the necessary documentation (as the Editor has elaborated, if necessary in the bathroom) and they drew an obnoxious blank. The head of security at the bank then said, without any context: ‘You cannot go upstairs’, even though they had not asked to ‘go upstairs’. Two armed NYPD policemen then appeared at the location and watched while the party was rudely ushered out of the building.
WANTA AND DIPLOMATIC DIRECTORS KICKED OUT OF CITIBANK
The bank’s disreputable lack of manners and gangster-style action in having the Ambassador’s diplomatic party removed from the building under the watchful eye of two armed NYPD policemen, in the manner described, coupled with their refusal of the Ambassador and his colleagues and their denial that they had any business at all with the bank, let alone any documents to sign, constituted, under US Federal law, an ‘act of conversion’ whereby the bank was formally asserting ownership of $4.5 trillion that has never belonged to the institution and which was specifically sent over by the Chinese authorities for the sole benefit of Ambassador Lee Wanta.
Therefore, Citibank reconfirmed (as though this were likely to be necessary) that it is a criminal enterprise serving the interests of the Dark Forces of humanity, manipulated by the CIA, and cannot be trusted with other people’s money. And as we have reiterated, any trustee holding funds with any branch of Citibank anywhere in the world, and who is aware of these reports, is at the gravest risk, given this publicised background, of being sued by the beneficiaries for placing their funds in prospective jeopardy with a criminal enterprise (hence the implosion of the bank’s share price?).
RUBIN SUMMONED ARMED NYPD POLICE OFFICERS
While all this was going on, Robert Rubin, who was then interim Chief Executive Officer of Citibank (but see below), had ordered the owners of the building, Boston Properties, to have Ambassador Wanta and his party removed from the premises. It will be recalled that Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., the Executive Vice President and Treasurer of Ambassador Wanta’s Commonwealth of Virginia-based corporation, telephoned the Editor of this service in ‘real time’ to inform him that ‘we are now being thrown out of the building’, and that thereafter the Ambassador and his party took up residence for the best part of eight hours at an adjacent Starbucks coffee shop.
During their sojourn in that unsalubrious location, they observed a huge stretched black limousine parked outside 399 Park Avenue, which they believed was the method of conveyance used by the Godfather of criminal godfathers, George Herbert Walker Bush Sr.
GODFATHER BUSH SR. WAS ‘UPSTAIRS’ QUIVERING IN HIS BOOTS
We are now in a position to reveal just what was going on ‘upstairs’ at Citibank. For who do you suppose was present in the bank ‘upstairs’ while Ambassador Wanta and his diplomatic party were being treated with barbaric rudeness and discourtesy by this criminal enterprise?
Why, none other than the Godfather of criminal godfathers, George Herbert Walker Bush Sr.
Bush Sr. was actually ‘upstairs’, cowering like a frightened rabbit in a car’s headlights, while Robert Rubin, his co-conspirator, was ordering Boston Properties to throw the Ambassador and his party out of the Citibank building. Citibank is a CIA bank, and the CIA is a notorious Illuminati, German-penetrated criminal enterprise, specialising in lies, subterfuge, disinformation, blackmail, and every other variant of the Black Arts of Lucifer imaginable.
HE WAS COORDINATING THE THEFT WITH ROBERT RUBIN
George Bush Sr was present at Citibank on the morning of 20th November 2007 because he was ‘persuading’ (according to a sanitised version) Robert Rubin not to remit the $4.5 trillion owned by Wanta since May 2006, to the Ambassador. That is the ‘soft’ version of what happened. But the ‘hard’ version is as follows:
• George Herbert Walker Godfather Bush Sr. was STEALING $4.5 billion in collusion with Robert Rubin (the former US Treasury Secretary under Clinton, and buddie of the former President), who had been ‘parachuted in’ when Charles O. Prince was eased out of Citibank a few weeks earlier.
• George Herbert Walker Godfather Bush Sr. was engaged in an operation to transfer $4.5 trillion to accounts in Dubai or Saudi Arabia (to be confirmed) into the hands of Robert Rubin, who flew immediately to Middle East for the purpose.
• How do we know this? Because authorities have informed the Principals that Rubin was in telephone contact while en route to Dubai/Saudi Arabia, in the air.
• This crude operation to steal the funds was thwarted, as has been the case with all the preceding attempts by this bunch of thugs to steal Wanta’s funds, because of course every single movement of dollar-denominated funds is traceable using INSLAW PROMIS software upgrades, and given that there are four separate teams monitoring these illegal dollar movements 24/7 every day of the year, with every such movement being tagged and coded. (The relevant codes will not have been known even by Paulson and Rubin).
The monitoring teams have of course accumulated damning evidence of this corruption which will entitle the likes of George Herbert Walker Godfather Bush Sr. to spend ten millennia contemplating the natural history and the life cycle of the American dung beetle and cockroach.
(On the tariff meted out to Ambassador Lee Wanta on the basis of lies and false witness, George Bush Sr. would need to serve a prison sentence lasting until the end of the solar system).
BUSH SR’S HANDLERS ARE TERRIFIED CIA COVER-UP SPECIALISTS
Actually, the man does have Alzheimers’ (sufferers of which are OK some days, and gaga on others) and is being exploited by his Black Arts handlers, who are desperate to cover up what Wantagate (due to their own endless stupidity) has unravelled, including their mass murders on 9/11, and what will now be pouring out into the public domain as a consequence of this historically unprecedented crisis and of their reckless refusal to remit Ambassador Wanta’s $4.5 trillion funds in June 2006 as planned (see the preceding report). As we have repeatedly stated, if the funds had been remitted then, instead of being hijacked by co-conspirator Paulson, most of this would have been brushed under a gigantic filthy carpet, and the Editor of this service would have been left dangling.
THE QUEEN PROVIDES FUNDS TO REPLACE THOSE STOLEN BY CITIBANK
But it gets considerably worse. Over the weekend or on Monday 25th November, Her Majesty The Queen provided the funds necessary to pay Ambassador Wanta his $4.5 trillion, since as we have mentioned in several previous reports, The Queen has all along wished for the Ambassador to receive the payment that he owns and is his due, given that we believe he is the only person in the United States whom Her Majesty (and the Chinese authorities) trusts, and for impeccable historical reasons. At the Group of Eight Meeting in June 2007, Her Majesty requested the Governments to procure the Wanta Settlement ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’.
The funds provided by the British Monarch were allegedly paid into an escrow account accessible only by The Queen’s signature, and by Treasury Secretary Paulson and a Citibank official, believed to have been Mrs Catherine Weir (to be confirmed, if possible). Attempting to steal money from an escrow account is such a heinous offence that there are literally no words that can be found to characterise its gravity.
WANTA AND COTTRELL TRUSTED AS METICULOUSLY RELIABLE
It is known in those places ‘where it matters’ that the Ambassador (and his colleague, Michael C. Cottrell, M.S.), can be trusted absolutely to honour their commitments. It is also worth repeating here that Chinese culture requires meticulous adherence to the fulfilment of financial and other undertakings: indeed, the Editor knows that this is the case from very long experience, since his firm’s Chinese official subscribers have invariably been impeccable in honouring their valued obligations towards us.
Their dealings are also straightforward and courteous, which explains why they are reported to consider the behaviour of these high-level US criminal desperados with extreme disgust, as indicative of a reversion to barbarism and the law of the jungle.
BUSH SR. STOLE AGAIN FROM THE BRITISH SOVEREIGN
Given that The Queen provided the funds with which the Ambassador was to be paid (Citibank having corruptly alienated the funds belonging to him, or having hidden them in another account), George Bush Sr., with the corrupt co-operation of Robert Rubin, attempted to steal from the British Sovereign. It need hardly be stated that this was an extraordinarily reckless and dangerous thing for the perpetrators (Bush Sr. and his CIA handlers) to do.
After the stealing and eventual restoration of The Queen’s gold earlier in 2007, for these demented American archcriminals to have had the audacity to try to steal funds that the Queen had graciously made available to finalise the Wanta payment (to replace Wanta’s funds evidently hidden, alienated or diverted by this criminal enterprise) raised the true meaning of the word ‘recklessness’ to a new level of consciousness.
And the fact that these two criminals thought that they could get away with this theft can only be explained on the basis that they had lost all contact with reason and were operating in panic mode, fortified by whatever ‘meds’ these people feed into their corrupted persons in order to survive the twinges at the dead of night inflicted by their ‘consciences seared through with a hot iron’.
Speaking of which, Vice President Richard Cheney was admitted to hospital on 26th November with renewed heart trouble (irregular heartbeat). Since Cheney is known also to have been engaged in related fraudulent transactions, that news hardly merits any expressions of surprise.
WHERE IS RUBIN? CAN HE RETURN WITHOUT BEING ARRESTED?
And where exactly IS Robert Rubin? Given the above, it would seem hazardous for this operative to return to the United States, as he would be liable to be arrested for attempting to steal the funds in collaboration with the Godfather. At that stage of the Wantagate crisis, it was still the case that the Provost Marshal General, Rodney L. Johnson, was thought to be in place.
However, since General Johnson was taking orders from Vice President Cheney (as confirmed by Treasury compliance and DOD Internal Affairs), he failed to intervene on 20th November, not least because he was participating in the round-table conference in Washington, DC, referenced in the immediately preceding reports, at which the $1.575 windfall tax payable by Ambassador Wanta to the US Treasury was being sliced and diced for remittance directly into the accounts of Federal agencies and Departments – thereby bypassing the US Treasury contrary to the US Constitution, which requires all appropriations for the Executive Branch to be approved by Congress.
PAULSON ENGAGED IN DEFRAUDING THE AMERICAN TAXPAYER
Since the Treasury was itself represented at that treacherous meeting, Henry M. Paulson, the US Treasury Secretary, was accordingly himself knowingly engaged in further defrauding the American taxpayer and the American people, as well as flouting the US Constitution, as was described in the preceding report. Those are impeachable offences, and we would like to know why we have not yet been informed that Mr Paulson has been handcuffed.
One reason for this may be that, since the Provost Marshal General failed to do his duty on 20th November, he has since been removed from his position or otherwise ‘stood down’ (reports on this matter are conflicting: he was either arrested, placed under house arrest, downgraded, stood down, or all of the above). His place has been taken, we are informed, by a NEW Provost Marshal, with the rank before his appointment of Colonel.
One respected high-level source, citing other high-level sources, says that quote ‘he is a bulldog who is a ‘by-the-book’ type and has no regard for politics. Let us hope that this is true and that he performs his duties with honour and appropriate speed’.
CITIBANK BEING PROPPED UP IN CASE IT COLLAPSES
Meanwhile Citibank is being further propped up in order to prevent its complete collapse, which could trigger a catastrophic 90% disintegration of the US dollar and a global currency upheaval so devastating that the entire world would be plunged into total economic and financial catastrophe, exactly as we predicted on this website on 2nd September 2006 and again in July this year – due exclusively to the bovine greed, jealousy, Luciferian madness and criminal recklessness of the following individuals: George H. W. Bush Sr., President George Bush Jr.,Vice President Cheney, Robert Rubin, William Jefferson Clinton, Mrs Hillary Rodinski Clinton, Dr Alan Greenspan, Dr Ben Bernanke, General Hayden, and the Boards of the other criminal institutions in the United States referenced in these reports.
NEW DEVELOPMENTS AT THE BANK THAT IS UNDER MASSIVE INVESTIGATION
The following developments concerning Citibank were reported on 27th November 2007:
(1) The new interim Chief Executive Officer of Citibank is Sir William Bischoff, from London. Robert Rubin has absented himself (see above).
(2) The Principals have now been told that Mrs Catherine Weir was not, after all, empowered to complete the Wanta Settlement payment. This is absolute nonsense and represents an egregious lie perpetrated by the usual disinformation cadres. The reality was that Mrs Weir was equipped with the necessary powers, but could not execute. On 19th November, Mrs Weir had the authority to complete the paperwork and the payment, but she, like the Provost Marshal, failed to do her job. We suspect that nothing much more may be heard of this woman, just as we may never catch another glimpse (metaphorically speaking) of General Johnson, either. However it is understood that General Johnson still answers his office’s telephone in person.
If Alice had gone through the Looking Glass in 2007 instead of the 19th century, she would have answered the telephone, if it rang, too.
(3) The Queen (MI6) is believed to have been obliged to inject a further $400 billion into Citibank on 27th November.
ABU DHABI INVESTMENT AUTHORITY BUYS A PIG IN A POKE
It was widely reported, too, that Citigroup announced on 26th November that it was selling a $7.5 billion stake to the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA).
This entity subscribed to International Currency Review for a decade or so, but suddenly failed to pay over subscription fees to us against our renewal invoices, contrary to the established practice whereby its renewals were paid automatically (in accordance with our terms of business). It further denied liability for the subscription, making the usual excuse that Mr So-and-so was no longer with the entity. When we reminded ADIA of our terms, they agreed to pay. The reason why they did not wish to continue subscribing to International Currency Review has now been revealed.
When you telephone this entity, you get an American female voice on the end of the line. It is almost impossible to get any response out of anyone there. More to the point, our journal would have been telling these people what they will not have wanted to hear: so we now tell them, free of charge, something further that they will not appreciate, either.
According to the open information, the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority agreed to buy a 4.9% equity stake in a complex transaction approved by US Federal Regulators; while the Managing Director of ADIA, Sheikh Ahmed bin Zayed al-Nayhan, commented that ‘this investment reflects our confidence in Citi’s potential to build shareholder value’.
Under the new arrangement, ADIA will receive convertible stock in Citigroup, with an 11% yield (so grossly in excess of what is available from other investments that it amounts to a clear indication that this institution is in severe distress), which must be converted into common stock at a price of $31.83 to $37.24 a share from March 2010 to September 2011. Citigroup officials told The New York Times and other media that they had briefed the credit rating agencies and had obtained approval from their main regulator, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
BARNEY FRANK, CHARLES SHUMER MAKE FOOLISH STATEMENTS
Various US legislators, usually known for their savvy assessments of financial sector reality, have made rare fools of themselves by commenting on this arrangement, which takes the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority for a ride and indicates that these Arabs have no clue when they are being fleeced. For instance, a spokesman for Representative Barney Frank, the Massachusetts Democrat Chairman of the House of Representatives’ Financial Services Committee, said noncommittally that his Congressman was reported to be ‘generally supportive that Citi was able to raise capital and reassure investors’. After rising slightly on the stock exchange, Citi’s stocks then initially slumped further. For his part, Charles E. Schumer, Chairman of the Joint Economic Committee and a senior member of the Senate Banking and Finance Committees, said in a statement that ‘this transaction will bolster Citigroup’s capital and competitiveness, and thereby help preserve New York’s status as the world’s financial center’ [sic!].
CHINESE OWN 96% OF CITIGROUP ASIA ASSETS IN DEBT
The only slight problem with all of this is that the Chinese own 96% of Citigroup Asia assets in the form of debt that they have purchased that’s backed up by assets of the institution. Because the Chinese will not invest in Citigroup unless AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. does, this Abu Dhabi accord, which has by no means yet been closed, represents a façade and implies that the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority are idiots.
Citibank has sold something that it doesn’t own, because the underlying assets are debt; while the Abu Dhabi fund will have acquired an unwanted option to convert their putative convertible stock into common stock in several years’ time at an almost fixed price. The market finally rose on 27th November, as gullible institutions were duly persuaded inter alia by this façade, and by the familiar circular market-rigging operations conducted by large New York banks, to invest in a sinking ship which is paralysed by its Board of Directors (most of whom are said to be on the way out) and by the corruption associated with its CIA masters and handlers, from the consequences of which it can no longer escape. The injection of funds by the British Monarchy will also have contributed to the belated temporary improvement in market sentiment.
3.00AM LANGLEY MEETING CONVENED FOLLOWING ATTEMPTED THEFT [27TH NOVEMBER]
It has been confirmed by several sources that an urgent 3.00 am meeting was convened at Langley (headquarters of the criminalised CIA), since between 7.00 am and 8.00am British time, it will have been ascertained that an attempt had been made by Bush Sr. and Rubin to divert the $4.5 trillion of funds provided by The Queen, as described above. Later in the morning, it was made known to the Principals inter alia that Sir William Bischoff had taken over as interim Chief Executive Officer.
In this context, the Principals were advised through certain channels that Sir William, working in place of Robert Rubin who had ‘vanished’, had ordered the Wanta Settlement to be completed on 27th November. However nobody bothered to work out the logistics, given that the Ambassador is located some 1,500 miles away from New York City, while Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., is at the far end of Pennsylvania. By the time this report was being finalised, Ambassador Wanta had received no communication from Citibank, and neither had Mr Cottrell.
RICH MENU OF CIA LIES FED TO THE EDITOR OF THIS SERVICE
Against this background, the Editor of this service has been fed a menu of variegated lies by US intelligence cells seeking to throw sand in our faces and to muddy the waters, which is what these people do, being unable to distinguish truth from the dumb falsehoods in which they routinely deal. These lies included the following inventive fairytales:
• Ambassador Wanta was in New York on Monday 25th November to sign the necessary paperwork. FACT: The Ambassador had only just returned from New York, as had Michael C. Cottrell. They did not go, and were not going anywhere.
• Same as above, with the date changed to Tuesday 26th November.
• Same as above, with the date changed to 27th November, with the further variant that either a package was en route from Citibank to the Ambassador for him to sign, or that a personal hand-carrier would arrive at the relevant address with the documents for his signature.
• Mr Cottrell and the Ambassador didn’t work Sundays, so nothing could be done that day. FACT: This poppycock conflicted with the fact that the Principals had both only recently returned home, and were going nowhere until the three simple conditions that they require Citibank to fulfil, are met. They have not been met. The reason that they have to be met is that there is no way that either of the Principals will travel to New York, on yet another wild goose chase, at their further expense, after having remained ‘on the road’ for forty days during which they were treated like dirt, and, on 20th November, with the disrespect reserved by snobs for guttersnipes.
• X and Y had been paid by Paribas, as ordered by President Sarkozy.
• Irrespective of what the Editor may say, the Ambassador had signed the necessary papers and had been paid. The Editor was being ‘lied to’ by Mr Cottrell! [see below].
• Citibank was endeavouring to persuade Mr Cottrell to sign a ‘hold harmless’, document prior to payment. FACT: No such intimation has been received, and if it were to be tried on, Mr Cottrell would advise those concerned that it is a felony to place a prospective signatory under duress in order to cover up other felonies.
Any such document would be illegal. Duress is a serious felony. No American can be compelled to sign a document requiring him or her to forfeit his or her Federal rights under duress. It appears that the purpose of this phantom demarche is to close down Mr Cottrell’s communications with the Editor of this service.
FACT: It is possible that Mr Cottrell may sign a document, but not under duress, and that once such a document has been signed, he will be unable to provide further ‘backwards information’ to the Editor. Such a development would be understandable, but will make no material difference to the reality that because these criminals chose to hijack Wanta’s funds in June 2006, the foundations of their unstable inverted pyramid of lies have been rocked and smashed, and they cannot put what has been revealed (and which we predicted would be exposed) back into its box. A total of 26 sets of Wanta materials have been distributed and are in safekeeping locations around the world, quite apart from the immense volume of Wanta-related information and documents that this Editor has accumulated on the worst financial corruption crisis in world history (also held remotely from his locations). So any document that Mr Cottrell chooses to sign will not solve the liars’ problems.
MR COTTRELL, WHOM THEY HATE, IS CALLED A ‘LIAR’
At length, in one of these conversations, one of the disreputable intelligence cells informed the Editor of this service that ‘Mr Cottrell is a liar’ [see above]. If Michael Cottrell had ever lied to the Editor of this service, the Editor would have ascertained this over a year ago. It was then implied, as has been implied by the same people in the past, that Mr Cottrell was not telling the Editor the truth, was withholding information from the Editor, or was twisting what the Ambassador had told Mr Cottrell, or all (or any permutation) of the above fabrications. This hazardous lie was countered by the Editor, to the open confusion of the person concerned, by the statement that the Editor had recently spoken with the Ambassador, and what he had said was 100% consistent, as usual, with what Mr Cottrell had told the Editor.
• FACT: At no time in our tripartite relationship, has the Ambassador or Mr Cottrell ever told the Editor anything but the truth, and at no time has the Editor ever found that what Mr Wanta has told him has diverged from what Mr Cottrell has told him, and vice versa. Therefore, these CIA idiots have exposed themselves for the deceitful perpetrators of brazen lies that they are. The Editor has forcefully informed all these people that feeding lies to us is counterproductive, will not succeed, and will be publicised: yet they keep on doing it. That is typical of these double-minded nutcases.
VERIZON WARNED THAT IT, TOO, WILL BE INVESTIGATED
In a separate incident, Verizon (which is a US intelligence operation of course) shut down Michael Cottrell’s communications on 27th November. When Mr Cottrell contacted the telephone company, he was initially faced with the usual arrogant attitude with which such phone companies go about their business, but he bluntly informed them of the massive Federal investigations that are taking place in connection with the issues referenced in these reports, and that he would see to it that Verizon was included in the investigations. Would the person he was talking to please ensure that the company’s legal counsel were informed of what he had just said?
The person at the other end of the line then vanished, and on returning to the phone, spoke to the Executive Vice President of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. with the necessary degree of belated courtesy that had initially been lacking. Meanwhile parallel malevolent forces deprived the Ambassador of all his computer communications on Sunday; and when the Editor last spoke to Lee Wanta on Tuesday morning, this remained the case. It may be recalled that NSA or Chicago gangsterland, or both, had attacked Michael Cottrell’s communications almost every day from June 2006 onwards, and that the Ambassador has similarly been harassed, in his case by certain parties unknown and also by that other intelligence communications behemoth, AT&T.
It should be added that a detailed record of all these abominations has been kept throughout, for reference, future action as necessary, and probably for consideration by the various Grand Juries that are sitting ‘as we speak’. From time to time, evil US intelligence idiots have tried to truncate (‘snip’) text published on this foreign website, which is of course completely illegal.
ANONYMOUS DISINFORMATION OPERATIVE ATTACKS THE EDITOR
While still on the subject of dirty tricks, the Editor of this service has again been attacked (as of 16th November) by an operative who hides his identity behind a pseudonym, and has pleaded in the past that he does this in order to protect his family. We all have families and this Editor does not hide behind a pseudonym. The Editor’s coordinates are fully known to the whole world, as they are available for all to see on our website and in our financial and other intelligence publications.
Spooks who hide behind anonymity and attack an Editor who has nothing to hide are despicable rats. They hide behind cloaks of anonymity because they have something to hide. In the well-known case in question, the spook or disinformation specialist’s main point is the infantile one that this Editor is ‘claiming all the glory’ for work that the spook and associates had been doing for years previously. This empty allegation deliberately misses the central point of the matter, of course.
This is that if it had not been for the dogged persistence of Ambassador Wanta, and Michael C. Cottrell, this spook and his associates would have been languishing in the anonymous limbo that they inhabit, spewing out their variegated spins on these events for the rest of their lives, with zero result. They were doing this for years, and they got nowhere. The reason they got nowhere was carefully explained in several recent posts on this website, wherein we pointed out that Bush Sr. and Greenspan devised a cunning mechanism that the Editor has called the ‘NEVER-PAY’ model, which was constructed in such a way that something would always go wrong, so that non-payment could always be blamed on whatever ‘failure’ the manipulators chose to activate. We thought we explained this very clearly in generic terms.
As for this Editor’s participation, the original intention was for the Editor not to reveal that he had paid $35,000 out of scarce private funds in order to bail the Ambassador out of his false probation (see the report dated 6th August, for ‘Wisconsingate’ details). However it became impossible to counter the myriad lies and disinformation which various CIA crooks and liars were disseminating; and the Ambassador then agreed that since the facts of the matter are true and can be disputed by no-one, it would make sense to reveal this factor so as to make it easier for the Editor to explain what had happened, and why Ambassador Wanta had all of a sudden ‘ceased to be dead’, thereby destroying the CIA’s Master Lie that he was dead.
That Master Lie formed the basis of the systematic ransacking of the Ambassador’s funds that subsequently took place, after Howe Kwong Kok was murdered following a visit by Mr Bush Sr. to Singapore in 1992, and Mr Wanta had been ‘taken down’ on trumped-up State of Wisconsin charges with no warrant and in contravention of international diplomatic law, in Lausanne on 7th July 1993.
Hence, the demeaning allegation that the Editor is ‘claiming the glory’ for the work that X, Y, and Z had been doing to try to ‘get paid’ for many years previously, is scurrilous, irrelevant, diversionary, beside the point and spurious. It is yet another concoction of disreputable CIA lies and fabrications.
The source of these lies should, Mr Cottrell adds, ‘put up or shut up’. To hide behind the cowardice of anonymity is indicative of the fact that we are dealing, as usual, with a disreputable intelligence cell which, by definition, cannot reliably tell what is true and what is false, and specialises in sowing confusion. These aberrations are also being routinely presented in a ‘NESARA’ context, which adds to the confusion in people’s minds, and has NOTHING to do with Wantagate whatsoever.
SITUATION PREVAILING BY THE EARLY HOURS OF 28TH NOVEMBER
By the early morning UK time of Wednesday 28th November 2007, the Ambassador had received no communications whatsoever from Citibank, despite the Principals having been advised earlier that Sir William Bischoff had ordered the situation to be resolved forthwith. The message, which had typically proved to be inaccurate, was that matters would ‘be fixed’. They have not been fixed.
The Federal investigations that were triggered on 20th November when Citibank, driven by the presence ‘upstairs’ of the quivering coward and Godfather, George Bush Sr., who was plotting with Mr Rubin to divert $4.5 trillion paid into the bank from London, are continuing. And Gold Badges are reported to have submitted their paperwork to proceed with further arrests.
The newly convened New York Grand Jury focusing on Wantagate, began taking evidence on Tuesday, and will be continuing to do this right through to the close of business on Friday, and thereafter. Manifestly we can make no further comment on this dimension of the showdown. The measures that have been set in train as a direct consequence of the ‘cause of action’ brought about by Citibank’s ‘act of conversion’, are irreversible. The attempt by George Bush Sr., with the assistance of his fellow conspirator Robert Rubin, to divert $4.5 trillion to Middle East, which was thwarted, will have appropriate consequences for all concerned.
Finally, Bush Sr. has severely aggravated powerful European families which were known to have been complaining already a few weeks ago that their bank accounts were being tampered with. That was not a good idea, either.
WANTA PAYMENT IS ESSENTIAL TO AVOID GLOBAL CATASTROPHE
To prevent global catastrophe, Ambassador Wanta’s $4.5 trillion has to be remitted, so that the on-the-books trading programmes under The Wanta Plan, for which institutions have been standing by for nearly two years, and which all concerned wish would commence without further delay (in order to refinance the world economy ON-THE-BOOKS), can finally progress.
With the start-up of these on-the-books operations, the US dollar will recover (due to the demand for dollars that will arise and that will be continuous), so that the current international financial and economic environment will be transformed.
Failing the payment, the US dollar will collapse, trade warfare will break out, exchange controls will be reimposed around the world, the standard of living in the United States will fall by perhaps 50%, soup kithens will become commonplace, and there will be a world depression such as humanity has never experienced since it started going off the rails many millennia ago.
• Please see our rpeort dated 2nd September 2006, for details [Archive].
TELL-TALE DIVERSIONARY OPERATIONS IN THE MIDDLE EAST
Various diversionary operations are going on in the Middle East, which have as their objective not the matters as publicised, but obfuscation either of illegal financial transactions (the aborted Bush Sr. theft) or of the Wanta payment itself. Whenever such sudden US ‘initiatives’ and media fixations with Middle East issues occur, there is usually an underlying obfuscation rationale.
The three current cover stories are the meeting convened by President Bush Jr. at the Naval Academy, Annapolis, MA, which will ostensibly aim to ‘restart’ negotiations to settle the Israeli-Palestinian conflict ‘once and for all’, but which has no chance of success, since the children of Israel and the Philistines were at each others’ throats three thousand years ago, and have been fighting on and off ever since; the signing of a pact between Baghdad and Washington to reach a ‘status of forces’ agreement which would provide for the establishment of permanent US military bases in Iraq (thereby ‘locking’ the White-House controlled ’independent’ Central Bank of Iraq, which the Americans ransacked in 2003, into a continuation of the corrupt financial carousel: see earlier analyses, passim); and the barbaric imprisonment of Gillian Gibbons, a 54-year-old British teacher in Sudan, who allowed her primary school pupils to call a teddy bear Mohammed, and who could face 40 lashes and a jail term if found ‘guilty’ of this heinous offence.
Of course, this last item could not have been planned. But it serves a most useful, if far-fetched, diversionary purpose, as well as illustrating that Lucifer is having a ball.
PEOPLE OUGHT TO READ THIS INFORMATION, AS IT INDICATES THE DEPTH OF THE DEPRAVITY THAT WANTAGATE HAS EXPOSED. CONSTANT REPETITION OF THIS BASIC DATA IS STILL NECESSARY…
• We now repeat, yet again, our familiar summary of the Statutes, securities regulations and fraud information that we have appended to these reports for many months. The reason we append this information is to remind everyone of their clear responsibilities under the US Misprision of Felony legislation, and of course to provide a legal basis for these reports.
LEGAL RECAPITULATION FROM REPORT DATED 30TH AUGUST 2007:
Reiteration of the fraudulent transactions involving Bank of New York Mellon – a bank so arrogant and conspicuously indifferent both to its tarnished reputation and to its grotesque breaches of US law and of N.A.S.D./S.E.C. Regulations, that it now takes first prize in the crowded competition for the title of ‘Most arrogant and corrupt financial institution in America’. At least, this was the case until the perpetration of the ‘Saturday scam’ described above and on 13th November:
Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.
Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:
• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scienter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.
• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.
Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:
THEFT BY DECEPTION:
• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.
• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.
• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.
Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.
• ‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.
• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.
Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.
SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON IS IN BREACH AND OF WHICH THE SIX ‘LEVY BANKS’ MAY LIKEWISE BE VARIOUSLY IN BREACH [CREDIT SUISSE, UBS, DEUTSCHE BANK, BANK OF AMERICA, CITIBANK, THE BANK OF ENGLAND]:
• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is in violation of:
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.
LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR SIR LEO WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT THE HIGHEST U.S. LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006, AND HAVE CONTINUED THEIR SERIAL CRIMES EVER SINCE:
• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war
This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Wanta’s funds.
The Directors and others listed in Part 1 of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and others posted on 11th June may likewise be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious violation of the laws itemised above. This list is reproduced in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, September 2007, on pages 163-168.
U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: MISPRISION OF FELONY:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.
Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001
• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier Wantagate reports.
We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.