DID BROWN BOTHER TO READ THE LISBON E.U. TREATY?

DOWNING STREET WON’T SAY. EDITOR’S REPEATED QUESTION UNANSWERED

Tuesday 22 January 2008 14:02

35 BRITISH BUSINESSMEN (‘USEFUL IDIOTS’) VOICE MINDLESS SUPPORT FOR TREATY…

…THEREBY CONDONING OPEN-ENDED EUROPEAN COMMISSION CORRUPTION AND FRAUD

NOBODY IS RESPONSIBLE, EVERYONE IS TO BLAME, AND WHO CARES ANYWAY?

CORRUPT NAZI ORIGINS OF THE SOCIALIST-COLLECTIVIST E.U. ENTRAPMENT SCAM

LONG-RANGE NAZI ‘SCISSORS’ DECEPTION STRATEGY AGAINST BRITAIN AND AMERICA

HOW WANTAGATE IS LIKELY TO HAVE JEOPARDISED THIS NAZI LONG-RANGE STRATEGY

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for ‘Wantagate’ reports since April 2006. [Note: A new panel giving details of our latest publications as they are made available, has been added].

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing financial global corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial corruption and global financial crisis in history. This website has been calling the shots, because of the hijacking of Wanta’s Settlement. This is the 89th Wantagate report: over a million words to date.

WANTAGATE NOTE:
At first sight, and on a superficial reading, the following report may appear not to have anything to do with Wantagate. However it will be found that, as you read on, this is very far from the case.

DOWNING STREET REFUSES TO SAY WHETHER GORDON BROWN READ THE LISBON TREATY
At 2.55pm on Friday 14th December 2007, the Editor telephoned the Press Office at Number Ten Downing Street, the Residence of the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown.

He asked the following question:

‘Did the Prime Minister read the European Union Treaty document that he has just signed in Portugal, before he signed it?’

The Downing Street Press Office official responded: ‘Er, I’ll get a Press Officer to call you back’.

Christopher Story: ‘Are you unable to answer my question?’

Downing Street Official: ‘I’ll get a Press Officer to call you back’.

Christopher Story: ‘When will that be?’

Downing Street Official: ‘Er, as soon as possible’.

• At 1.30pm on Tuesday 18th December 2007, the Editor telephoned the Press Office at Number Ten Downing Street, the Residence of the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown.

He asked the following question:

‘Did the Prime Minister read the European Union Treaty document that he has just signed in Portugal, before he signed it?’

Downing Street Official: ‘I’m sure he read it’.

Christopher Story: ‘Do you know when he read it?’

Downing Street Official: ‘No, but I can try and find out for you’.

Christopher Story: ‘You’ll call me back?’

Downing Street Official: ‘I will do, certainly’.

• At 11.30am on Tuesday 17th January 2008, the Editor telephoned the Press Office at Number Ten Downing Street, the Residence of the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown.

He asked the following question:

‘Did the Prime Minister read the European Union Treaty document that he has just signed in Portugal, before he signed it?’

Downing Street Official: ‘I’ll get someone to call you back. What’s your phone number, Chris?’

Christopher Story: ‘7222 3836’.

Downing Street Official: ‘I’ll get someone to give you a call back’.

EDITOR DECEIVED BECAUSE DOWNING STREET CALLBACK ASSURANCES WERE FALSE
The Editor of International Currency Review has been lied to by the Prime Minister’s Office.

No-one from the Downing Street Press Office had called him back with an answer to his simple, straightforward question, by the date of this posting.

One does not need to possess a first-class degree in psychology to understand why no answer has been forthcoming. Manifestly:

• If the Prime Minister read the document before he signed it, he is a traitor and is in grotesque breach of his oath of loyalty to the British Head of State, HM The Queen.

• If the Prime Minister did not read the document before he signed it, he is in dereliction of his duty to defend the interests of the British people and the Monarchy, is grossly incompetent, and should be impeached.

• If the question could not be answered, the correct and honest answer should have been:

‘We cannot answer your question’.

Obviously, officials decided that their safest course would be not to respond at all, so that (a) they cannot be accused of deception and lying, and (b) the matter is conveniently left up in the air.

That is dishonest, small-minded, scandalous and reprehensible.

The Editor of this service, being a member of the press, was entitled to a straight answer to his simple question. He has been given the usual brush-off that is meted out to anyone who has the temerity to query the duplicitous official (revolutionary, anti-nation state) ‘line’.

BRITISH PARLIAMENT DEBATES ITS DEMISE, WHILE ‘USEFUL IDIOTS’ WRITE TO THE PAPERS
In the British House of Commons this week, the European Union (Amendment) Bill is undergoing its second reading. On 9th October of last year, the Labour-dominated House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee confirmed that the ‘revised’ EU Lisbon Treaty document is almost precisely the same as the European Constitution, which was rejected in referenda held in the Netherlands and France in 2005. M. Giscard d’Estaing, the self-important, opinionated patrician former President of France, who was instrumental in composing the original convoluted ‘European Constitution Treaty’, has himself explicitly acknowledged that the latest document ‘is the same as the Constitution’, with cosmetic language adjustments. The European Constitution (today, the Lisbon) Treaty essentially destroys the residual decayed sovereignty of the pathetic constituent satrap European (EU) nation states, in blind accordance with the recklessly accelerating globalist (Illuminati-driven) offensive to destroy all nationalsovereignty and to collectivise everything (Communism).

On 21st January, a posse of 35 characters who are prominent on the British business scene – led by the disgraced former BP boss, Lord Browne, the CEO of WPP, Sir Martin Sorrrell, the Chairman of Apax Partners, Sir Ronald Cohen and the Chairman of J Sainsbury, Sir Philip Hampton, published a letter in The Daily Telegraph containing the following tired and content-free language:

‘As business leaders, we believe that our instinctive [PLEASE NOTE] pro-Europe approach should be complemented by a drive for further [sic] economic reform, and for an effective single market, entailing a level playing field [sic] for all companies. Sometimes it is necessary to be critical of what the EU says and does. But this should be done in the overall context of Britain enjoying a positive relationship with the EU’.

Interpretation:

• ‘Our support for the destruction of national sovereignty is based upon ‘INSTINCT’.

• It is not, therefore, based upon INTELLECT. Now, one might have thought that these great big, self-important businessmen were accustomed to conducting their business operations on the basis of the exercise of intellectual aptitude. Assuming that to be the case, why do they ABANDON the use of their intellects with respect to their support for the European Union?

One presumes that their intellects inform them that corruption within their own organisations is ‘a bad thing’. Why, then, do they tolerate it in the EU context? Are they all mad?

• Or could it be that THEY DIDN’T KNOW THAT THE E.U. COLLECTIVE IS CORRUPT?

FACT: If they didn’t know even that, they are not merely guilty of failing to apply their intellects to this matter: they are ignoramuses, as well.

• ‘Drive for further economic reform’: What is the meaning of the adjective ‘further’ here? To what SPECIFIC economic reform do they refer? As close students of the European Union Collective, we are not aware of any ‘reform’. Since, therefore, no concrete, identifiably relevant ‘economic reform’ has actually taken place, why do they imagine that their call for FURTHER economic reform is in any way meaningful? You cannot have FURTHER economic reform if none has taken place to date.

In any case, these ‘Useful Idiots’ (as Lenin called such people who, wittingly or otherwise, further the evil interests of the Revolution), a political and economic collective is genetically impervious to ‘reform’. And of course, as usual, the ‘Useful Idiots’ never define their terms, do they? What do they MEAN by ‘reform’? They don’t say (because they don’t know, or care).

• ‘Level playing field’: This is a well-known collectivist term. So these supposedly free market UKbusinessmen are collectivists? That may explain why they choose to overlook the striking fact that the annual costs of EU regulation (the basic building block of Communism, by the way) across the 27 EU member States amounts to 600 billion Euros (approximately 5.5% of EU Gross Domestic Product), whereas the much-proclaimed ‘trade benefits’ of thevaunted ‘single market’ that the 35 signatories ‘enjoy’, aggregate only 160 billion Euros.

• The source of this data is Gunter Verheugen (never heard of him?), the European Commission Vice-President responsible for Industry and Enterprise.

• ‘Sometimes’ criticism of the EU is ‘necessary’: ‘Sometimes’? Excuse us!

Any objective, unbrainwashed student of the EU Collective will tell these clowns that criticism of the EU Collective is ESSENTIAL, not just ‘necessary’, 100% of the time.

The organisation is a long-range political scam (see below) and a cesspool of ongoing corruption (see below). Therefore, criticism cannot EVER be occasional, as they deceitfully suggest. It must be ongoing and permanent. Not, by the way, that ‘criticism’ will or can ever have the slightest impact upon the EU’s structures. This is a political collective, after all, and these people, who are so keen, evidently, on collectivisation, appear to have NO IDEA how a collective operates (see below).

• Finally, their ‘occasional criticism’ SHOULD, they say, be proffered in the context of ‘overall support for Britain enjoying a positive relationship with the EU’.

Consider the lazy, mindless intellectual fallacies here:

(a) The implication that one must not draw attention to the fact that this is a political scam and a cesspit of corruption, for fear of jeopardising Britain’s supposedly ‘positive relationship’, which exists only as empty dogma in their weird, naive imaginations. FACT: Britain has NEVER enjoyed a positive relationship with the EU. It has never ENJOYED this relationship. Period.

(b) The false implication that Britain NEEDS to be a member of this corrupt political collective in order to ‘enjoy’ a positive relationship with it.

True, one cannot ‘enjoy’ a positive relationship with any organisation as rotten as the European Union, so the loose language these people use here is unfit for purpose.

FACT: Since the relationship is NOT ENJOYED and is NOT POSITIVE (except in the arid imaginations of these traitors), it does not follow that non-membership would be ‘any worse’.

HOW BRITAIN CAN GET ITSELF OUT OF THE CLUTCHES OF THESE MAD HEGEMONISTS
On the contrary, each and every EU satrap Member State would always NEED to ‘enjoy’ a positive relationship’ with a country as powerful and as important as Britain, not least given its huge market: from which it follows that bilateral, arms-length relationships would plainly fulfil all the needs and aspirations of the individual EU countries – and vice versa, of the United Kingdom.

If, by some miracle, this Editor were ever to be appointed British Foreign Secretary (!), he would immediately order his staff to produce a list of every single bilateral, collective and other external agreement that Britain has with all external entities, including residual nation states. No accords would be exempt. He would require the complacent Foreign Office staff to prepare a single sheet of paper for each accord, stating the expiry date and the period of notice that is legally required under international law to be given. He would further order all existing accords to be subject to a blanket requirement that the relevant legal notice of Britain’s intention not to renew, must be given at the commencement of the period of notice, with no exceptions.

Finally, he would leave it to the other parties to make representations to London as to why they would prefer the existing arrangements to continue; whereupon the staff would be instructed to review each case on its merits but to reach no conclusions pending decisions to be taken wholly and exclusively in accordance with Britain’s national interests (which the EU has collectivised: but this exercise would take precedence, as Britain’s EU membership is, in fact, illegal).

TELEGRAPH HAPPY TO PUBLISH SUCH TRIPE, BUT NOT THE EDITOR’S POINTED LETTER
We have, of course, suffered 35 years of empty rhetoric from ‘Useful Idiots’ such as the 35 ‘Great and Good’ signatories of the letter to The Daily Telegraph. That newspaper was happy to publish their subversive, empty-headed propaganda, but was unwilling to publish the following letter from the Editor of this service dated Saturday, 15th December 2007, and emailed to the newspaper at 2:49pm. (Note: That hardly mattered, of course: The Daily Telegraph’s circulation is less than one million. But according to French intelligence, reports published on this website have at times attracted up to 50 million readers worldwide).

The Editor
The Daily Telegraph
111 Buckingham Palace Road
London SW1W 0DT Fax: 020-7931 2878

Dear Sir:

At 2.55pm on Friday 14th December 2007, the Editor telephoned the Press Office at Number Ten Downing Street, the Residence of the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown.

He asked the following question:

‘Did the Prime Minister read the European Union Treaty document that he has just signed in Portugal, before he signed it?’

The Downing Street Press Office official responded: ‘Er, I’ll get a Press Officer to call you back’.

Christopher Story: ‘Are you unable to answer my question?’

Downing Street Official: ‘I’ll get a Press Officer to call you back’.

Christopher Story: ‘When will that be?’

Downing Street Official: ‘Er, as soon as possible’.

It is now 2.45pm on Saturday afternoon, and I have received no phone call from the Downing Street Press Office.

I and others will be interested to see whether you publish this letter.

Yours faithfully,

Christopher Story FRSA
Editor and Publisher
International Currency Review
World Reports Limited
108 Horseferry Road
Westminster
London SW1P 2EF

CORRUPTION AND OBFUSCATION IN THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION
In order to ‘combat corruption’ in the EU, the European Commission operates an outfit called OLAF (= the EC ‘Anti-Fraud Office’). The Editor has attended sessions of the OLAF Supervisory Board at the European Parliament in Brussels. His observations were as follows:

• The officials on the platform routinely spend a great deal of time congratulating each other on being on the platform because of their ‘distinguished’ records, and generally pumping each other up and massaging each other’s insufferable egos.

• Substantive matters (i.e. corruption issues) are left as late in the agenda as possible, by which time most people have long since got bored stiff and have gone home.

• When substantive internal EC corruption issues cannot be sidestepped altogether, they are routinely tackled by ‘calls for’ new ‘regulations’. Gullible Members of the European Parliament are primed in advance to ‘call for’ such regulations.

• The overall, ongoing objective of OLAF, and of its sycophantic ‘supervisory’ committee, is to kick unavoidable corruption investigations into the no-man’s land that follows the termination of each European Commission’s six-year tenure.

• By this means, when a new Commission arrives, it ‘knows nothing’ about issues facing the previous Commission, and a ‘that was then, this is now’ attitude supervenes.

• A standard obfuscation technique used by the European Commission to hide internal corruption is as follows. Open investigation A. Let it run for a month or two. Then open parallel investigation B. Let it run for some further months. Then arrange for several tame MEPs (Members of the European Parliament) to ‘call for’ investigation C. This then gives rise to ‘calls for’ investigations A and B to be suspended, a.k.a. held in abeyance, pending the outcome of investigation C. If this multi-layered obfuscation methodology fails to kick the embarrassing corruption issue into the no-man’s land between Commissions, open investigation D. Repeat the cycle as necessary.

• The basic rule of thumb is as always follows:

‘Nobody is responsible, everyone else is to blame, and who cares anyway’.

In 2006, the House of Lords’ European Committee conducted an inquiry into the management and audit of expenditure by the European Communities.

Its report, dated November 2006, was entitled ‘Financial Management and Fraud in the European Union: Perceptions, Facts and Proposals’. The damning Lords report found that the European Commission exhibited a cavalier disregard for accuracy, basic integrity and any sense of genuine responsibility for the funds that it manages. On 28th January 2007, a diligent analyst of European Union Collective aberrations, Christopher Booker, wrote as follows in his column in The Sunday Telegraph. (Note: Criticism of the EU is confined to Booker’s column. That’s how it is ‘controlled’):

‘Although the Commission’s operating revenue for 2005 was given, with implausible precision, as 107,890,098.965.56 Euros, it was impossible to discover where most of this money had come from or gone to, because the accounts do not use the double-entry system used by every corner shop. They are just a maze of meaningless figures. For instance, a figure for the EU’s ‘long-term and short-term pre-financing’ suddenly goes up from zero to 28 billion Euros, without explanation’.

EXAMPLES OF EUROPEAN COMMISSION CORRUPTION OBFUSCATION METHODOLOGY
Without going down rabbit-holes on this issue, and purely in order to illustrate the prevailing ethos of institutionalised EC corruption, that so-called pre-financing item should have been treated as cash. If it was not cash, then it was either a receivable debtor, or an expense.

If it was an expense, then the European Commission is paying out sums of money from its budget without completed authority. If it was a receivable debtor, then the omission of the 28 billion Euros from the accounts was either negligence or fraud. Experts have suggested that creditors/accruals are routinely inflated to justify the EC’s budgetary demands from the satrap ‘Member States’.

The controlled EC Court of Auditors (which can make quite rude noises but of course possesses no teeth) complained that taxpayers are having to pay for management and accounting errors, rather than the missing funds being recovered. It exceeded its usual mild criticism with this statement:

‘Such a practice certainly casts doubt on the EU as a community of law and justice because financial corrections do not make illegal or irregular projects and expenditure legal and regular’.

Among innumerable ‘irregularities’, the following can be cited for brief illustration purposes here:

• A massive pension debt vanished, yet the colossal accumulated liability has remained in place.

• On 12th August 2005, Hans-Martin Tillack, a journalist with Stern, reported in the EU Observer, quoted from an internal note written in March 2003 by ‘experts of the OLAF Supervisory Committee’ who alleged that OLAF conducts ‘fake investigations’ [see above].

• Since fraud is endemic within this massive unelected and accountability-free bureaucracy, it is standard practice to ‘allow’ that a certain amount of EC financial fraud takes place, so that it can be ‘cited’ in reports to provide fodder for the media. For instance, Mr Vladimir Spidler, a European Commissioner from the Czech Republic, reported that in 2004, some 266 million Euros-worth of EC allocations were suspended for irregularities. According to the OLAF itself, more than three million Euros is lost every day to EU fraud. OLAF has stated that the cost of EU fraud between 1999 and 2005 was $6.5 billion Euros. None of these data were revealed to the House of Lords’ inquiry; and these figures, as indicated, were cosmetic numbers only.

• The reader of the European Commission’s accounts, which are qualified every year by the Court of Auditors, in order for the Court to be able to retain ‘integrity’, is unable to reconcile the amounts shown on one page with those shown on another page, so that, accordingly, no reliable information is ever provided in EC Accounts documentation.

• Amounts presented are or have been obtained from inventories, which is no substitute for the proper recording of individual transactions. In fact the inventory method of accounting has no value per se at all.

A comprehensive critique of the House of Lords’ findings and of additional indications of massive ongoing European Commission financial fraud was published in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2 [September 2007]. Discrepancies between the closing balances in one year and the opening balances in the next are commonplace.

The former EC Commissioner Neil Kinnock, previously the windbag leader of the Labour Party which Gordon Brown now heads, made some 15 statements to the House of Lords Committee concerning the former Chief Accountant of the EC, Mrs Marta Andreasen, which she disputed.

NEVER-ENDING PLAY-ACTING AND DECEPTION BY THE E.U. COLLECTIVE
In order to provide its unpopular (and illegitimate) policies with fake ‘credibility’, the European Parliament stages, from time to time, what it calls an ‘agora’ (Greek for ‘marketplace’ or forum for public debate). This was the format adopted on 8-9th November 2007 by the controlled Parliament (in which speeches are usually required to be no more than one minute long, or else the MEP risks having the microphone switched off, Soviet style), for its staged informed debate’ on the recycled European Constitution Treaty.

The underlying theme of these events is that the system of one person, one vote (= ‘democracy’) needs to be augmented, a.k.a. supplanted, by ‘participative democracy’, involving so-called ‘civil society actors’ i.e. lobbying organisations (or non-governmental organisations) which turn out to be funded by the Commission itself. Thus, as Roger V. Helmer MEP has explained, ‘the Commission is spending taxpayers’ money to get itself lobbied by people it is funding itself’ – a truly scandalous arrangement that Helmer describes as ‘institutional incest’.

The Editor has attended the European Parliament. It is modelled precisely on, and looks exactly like, like the Supreme Soviet, which is what it is intended to become.

Completion of the transformation can easily be achieved by replacing the pretentious European symbols behind the podium, with a bust of Lenin, and a hammer and sickle.

THE NATIONAL SOCIALIST ORIGINS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIALIST E.U.
Many people remain confused by the fact that the European Union Collective operates as a collective (the Communist model), and yet originated in Nazi Germany (for the purposes of this presentation, although its origins can be traced back much further). We will explain this below.

In a collective, it is intentionally the case that no-one is responsible for anything, since all are responsible collectively for everything: in other words, there is and can be no accountability.

The deluded former ‘Conservative’ Foreign Secretary, Lord Hurd, used to pontificate about the EU being all about ‘cooperation’. He never grasped that this is a crude deception: for ‘cooperation’, read collectivisation. The British Foreign Office, arguably the most penetrated and treacherous of all the British Government structures, labours under this elementary delusion to this day.

• Lord Hurd, by the way, was notoriously overheard, after signing the EU’s Maastricht Treaty in 1992, to have observed: ‘We’d better find out what we’ve just signed’. Downing Street, apparently, cannot even risk informing us that Gordon Brown read the subversive treaty AFTER he signed it.

Like the 35 ‘Useful Idiots’ referenced above, who fondly imagine that it is possible for Britain to have a ‘positive relationship’ with a supranational government that exists specifically in order to usurp the sovereignty of its satrap nation states (under cover of fake, contrived ‘legitimacy’), Hurd used to waffle about ‘fighting our corner in Europe’ or alteratively, ‘being at the centre of Europe’.

The man never grasped, either, that no-one can influence the behaviour of a collective, let alone be ‘at the centre’ of it. A collective is a collective. It doesn’t matter whether one is at the centre, the periphery, half-way to the centre, or on the moon. Decisions are taken collectively, which means that all EU Member States are always permanently subordinate to the collective.

This is so elementary and basic, that one wonders whether these people sit on their brains because they are brainwashed. Part of the brainwashing process conditions their minds into accepting, without any explanation, the ‘need’ for national sovereignty to be ‘shared’.

Likewise, as the late Lord Bruce of Donington, who was the ‘Mr Europe’ in the Callaghan Labour Government that preceded Mrs Thatcher’s first Administration in the 1970s, taught this Editor, the satrap EU nation states have no ‘national interests’ (as UK politicians continue to parrot) because, by definition, the national interests of all the EU nation states have been largely collectivised. The intention is that they should be 100% collectivised: didn’t these ‘Useful Idiots’ know that?

The Editor’s book ‘The New Underworld Order’, like some of our recent serials, displays an image of a very early Nazi Labour Day emblem, showing Karl Marx with a hammer and sickle, above an eagle which is standing on a swastika. Thus the symbols of Nazism (National Socialism) and Communism (International Socialism) are united in this early Nazi emblem – illustrating the dialectical reality and identity of these false, controlled geopolitical ‘opposites’.

These two scourges of mankind come out of the same globalist Illuminati sewer. At the very same time that Karl Marx (Moses Mordecai Levi) was writing the ‘Communist Manifesto’ (Thesis) under the close direction of one group of revolutionary Luciferian Illuminists, Dr Karl Ritter of Frankfurt University, was developing the Antithesis to Marx’s Thesis under instructions from another cadre of the Illuminati. Ritter’s work was continued further by the nihilist German Magus and philosopher Friedrich Wilhelm Nietsche (1844-1900) and by Heidegger and Schmitt, and was then elaborated into Fascism en route to National Socialism – thus providing the controlling Luciferian Illuminati nutcase elite with the desired dual manipulation ‘Black regime’ tools for the fomentation of the two world wars and the Soviet Revolution et seq.

DOCUMENTARY PROOF OF THE E.U.’S GERMAN NAZI ORIGINS AND INTENT
We can now briefly recapitulate the basic facts confirming that the European Union is an operation of the German Nazis’ Strategic Continuum, bearing in mind that, as will be further explained in a future exposure, German and covert Soviet intelligence work closely together, and always have done (notwithstanding the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact: see the Editor’s latest book, cited above). Documentary proof that the European Union Collective is a Nazi Continuum operation includes:

• Europaische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft, a compendium of seminar papers prepared by the Nazi intelligentsia at a special symposium held in Berlin in 1941, and published there in 1942 by Haude & Spenersche Velagsbuchhandlung Max Paschke, of which a copy exists at the British Library and a copy is also available at the Deutsche Staatsbibliothek (Preussische Staastbibliothek), Berlin. The chapter headings of this document are virtually identical to those of the 1992 Maastricht Treaty, from which the European Constitution Treaty (now the Lisbon Treaty) is derived.

• Under the title ‘Generalplan 1945’, several documents were drawn up by the Nazi planners in the closing days of the Third Reich which were captured by the Allies in 1945. A document within this group, initialled by Grand Admiral Doenitz and Field Marshal Keitel, sketched out a ‘New European Order’ (‘Europaische Friedensordnung’), which is almost indistinguishable from what Dr Konrad Adenauer sold to the gullible and exhausted Allies, as ‘United Europe’.

Dr Adenauer, Germany’s first postwar Chancellor, who was approved by the Allies, was a prewar Mayor of Cologne and a close friend of Hitler’s favourite bankers, Herrn Drs. Abs and Pferdmenges.

A third captured Nazi strategic document, entitled ‘The Overcoming of the Catastrophe’, written by the Nazi High Command, specifically emphasised the solid mutual advantages of a Russo-German alliance against the West. Dr Adenauer later told the Reichstag that this basic secret must ‘never be revealed’ to the Western powers.

Following the orchestrated ‘collapse’ of the Soviet Union and its East European Empire, the cover provided by Soviet Communism that masked the continued existence of the German Nazi Strategic Continuum, was removed. The ‘takedown’ of the USSR was facilitated by American and key foreign intelligence spearheaded by Ambassador Lee Wanta’s brilliant Financial Warfare operations, but was secretly ‘intended’ by the Soviet strategists in order that their known long-range strategy of expanding westwards through the eastwards expansion of the European Union could be realised.

This strategy was explicitly predicted and explained to the CIA by Anatoliy Golitsyn, the famous Soviet defector, in his work ‘The Perestroika Deception‘, edited by this Editor and available from the books section of this website. The CIA, being controlled by the German ‘Black’ Nazi Strategic Continuum, was permanently deaf to Golitsyn’s meticulously documented intelligence.

It has since become clear that East Germany’s notorious STASI secret police apparat was actually a manifestation of the Gestapo dressed in ‘Communist’ clothing, owing secret continuing allegiance to Nazi ‘Black’ counterintelligence (see below).

Well, of course.

THE ‘SCISSORS’ STRATEGY MASTERMINDED BY DEUTSCHE VERTEIDIGUNGS DIENST
This all made it possible for this Editor and others somewhat belatedly to identify the continued existence of the Nazi Abwehr (strategic counterintelligence) operating, quite unbelievably, out of a nondescript building in Dachau, of all notorious locations, near Munich. This ‘Black’ entity is known in intelligence circles as the DVD (Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst). It is the primary engine of the secret long-range ‘SCISSORS’ offensive against ‘the Main Enemy’ – Britain and the United States:

• Against Britain, the DVD’s weapon (or one blade of the Nazi scissors) is the European Union Collective, which has virtually destroyed Britain’s national sovereignty, has severely corrupted the British system of governance, and has decimated the country’s industrial base and infrastructure. German corporations now control significant proportions of British energy and water supplies, while Deutsche Bahn will take over the running of certain railway systems in the near future. In innumerable other ways, which would require far too much explanation here, the EU Collective, derived from the Nazi blueprint, is calculated and designed to DESTROY Britain once and for all.

• Against the United States, the Reinhard Gehlen intelligence organisation (the other blade of the Nazi scissors) which imposed the Nazi jackboot on parts of the Soviet Union, was backed into what became the CIA after the Second World War. The Cold War was essentially invented by Nazi Abwehr General Reinhard Gehlen, and sold to the Americans, who ‘needed’ a pretext to sustain and expand their military-industrial complex. Under ‘Operation Paperclip’, whereby large numbers of Himmler’s scientists and intelligence officers penetrated the new Central Intelligence Agency, buttressed by the National Security Act of 1947 et seq (a crooks’ charter’), the CIA was duly set up to become the notorious instrument of corruption, duplicity and global revolution that we know and loathe today.

Not content with this, the Nazis actually exported Admiral Canaris, the Abwehr head, who surfaced later in Oklahoma City. He was supposed to have been hanged in the nude on 9th April 1945 (a Nazi disinformation fairytale) but resurfaced later in the United States under the name of Samuel Randall Pittmann, travelling regularly back to Germany. Canaris fell ill in 1974 and was briefly substituted for by Dr Henry (‘Henny’) Kissinger, who kept the seat warm for George Herbert Walker Bush, the long-range DVD representative, who replaced William Colby (fired by the late President Gerald Ford) as Director of Central Intelligence (DCI), thereby placing the CIA under the DVD’s direct control.

Langley, the CIA’s headquarters, is known as the George Bush Center for Intelligence, a fact which presupposes that the CIA is perfectly content to be the instrument of the long-range Nazi Strategic Continuum. The Murrah Building in Oklahoma City, bombed in 1995, was the main US depository of Nazi personnel and strategic documentation in the United States.

LONG-RANGE NAZI SUBVERSIVE INFLUENCE-BUILDING OPERATIONS
One of the Nazis’ most lasting long-range postwar strategic deception operations involved the establishment, FOLLOWING THE SUPPOSED NAZI COLLAPSE IN 1945, of innumerable seemingly perfectly innocuous societies and groups, all working in a camouflaged way (‘getarnt’), with the intention, which was successfully realised, of elaborating the Nazi ‘Fuehrermission’ (the ‘global leadership privilege’). This tradition, perpetuated secretly by Deutsche Vertiedigungs Dienst (DVD), Dachau, appears to be alive and well in Davos ‘as we speak’. And before the US State Department weakly succumbed to the blandishments of the insistent pro-German lobby after the War, it clearly understood that the Nazis had a long-range plan which they were capable of implementing.

Specifically, on 30th March 1945, an official State Department release announced as follows:

‘Reliable information collected by Allied Governments clearly indicates that the Nazi regime in Germany has developed well arranged post-war plans for the perpetuation of Nazi doctrines and domination. Some of these plans have already been put into operation and others are ready to be launched on a widespread scale immediately upon termination of hostilities in Europe’.

‘The [US] Government is now in possession of photostatic copies of several volumes of German [postwar] plans… the German propaganda program is to be an integral part of the overall postwar strategy… The program will be expanded and intensified with the object of giving re-birth to all Nazi doctrines and furthering German ambitions for world domination. Unless these plans are checked, they will present a constant menace to postwar peace and security’.

The Nazi postwar plans were not checked, not least because the US State Department was itself penetrated and ‘turned’ by apologists for the Nazis. Accordingly, the Nazi long-range subversion strategy has indeed presented ‘a constant menace to postwar peace and security’, with the ghastly consequences that we observe before us today. Several years ago, in a fit of honesty, an American operative admitted to the Editor of this service that virtually ALL of the world’s problems these days could be attributed to long-range Nazi strategy, and to the CIA’s treacherous collaboration with it.

The prevailing global financial crisis reflects inter alia the shock impact of Wantagate, resolution of which effectively blocks the global fraudulent finance orgy masterminded by the long-term German DVD agent George H. W. Bush Sr. and his partner in giga-crime, Dr Alan Greenspan – who, between them, invented the ‘never-pay’ formula, whereby every ‘rectification’ payment is dependent upon superior layers of payments, so that sabotage of any superior payout blocks all payouts governed by those in higher tiers. By this means, the global ransacking, Ponzi scamming and stealing of base and fiat money funds to generate the open-ended resources with which the perpetrators’ global hegemony plans have been financed, could continue (and have continued) indefinitely.

Until now.

THE NAZI LONG-RANGE PLAN TO CONTROL THE UNITED STATES
German Nazi long-range strategy was summarised in a secret memorandum issued by the German Geopolitical Centre in Madrid, which was established by the Nazi intelligentsia and the Gestapo in 1942. The document, captured by the Allies en route from Madrid to secret Nazi centres in Bonn, Rome, Barcelona, Buenos Aires and South Africa in the early 1950s, and referred to as the Madrid Circular Letter, was labelled ‘SG 23: Top Secret!’. It contained inter alia the following statement:

‘For us the war has never stopped and, as is well known, in war every ruse is permissible’.

This crucial document represented nothing less than a carefully considered blueprint for a ‘new’ German (secret Nazi) approach to dividing and conquering the world – beginning with the ‘Main Enemy’: Britain and the United States.

• For America, the Nazi long-range plan was expressed in the following stark terms:

‘We intend to build the Thousand-Year Reich on the Ruins of the United States’.

The financing of this operation has been presided over by George Bush Sr. (DVD), through his massive financial fraud operations, which he masterminded with the technical assistance of his fellow arch-criminal, Dr Alan Greenspan.

In both the European and the US context, the primary postwar weapons of Nazi subversion have all along been bribery and corruption, on a scale with no historical precedent. These weapons have been buttressed by Himmlerian mind-control and ‘Psy-Ops’ offensives (MK-Ultra-style), elaborated in the Internet era by what we call ‘reverse Goebbelsism’. Dr Josef Goebbels held that a single lie, if repeated often enough, became ‘fact’. The more sophisticated, and even more diabolical, US-CIA Psy-Ops open brainwashing method involves the mass production of diversionary claptrap, behind which smokescreen of confusion the criminal geopoliticians have imagined that they can go about their sordid business with impunity. This Luciferian system is unravelling today before our eyes.

WANTAGATE MAY NOW HAVE FRUSTRATED THE FINAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS NAZI LONG-RANGE OFFENSIVE AGAINST THE U.S. COMPONENT OF THE ‘MAIN ENEMY’, BY JEOPARDISING AND ALSO BLOCKING OFF THE OPEN-ENDED FIAT FINANCING NEEDED TO BRIBE EVERYONE CONSIDERED TO BE LIABLE TO BE STANDING IN THE WAY OF THE THOUSAND-YEAR REICH.

As for secret German-Soviet collaboration (at the intelligence level), ‘The Overcoming of the Catastrophe’ document annexed to the ‘Generalplan’ in Berlin on 5th April 1945, was explicit:

‘The two great peoples, the Russians and the Germans, have extraordinary possibilities for development without collision of their interests. Thus would be formed an alliance between the young Socialist forces against the old rotten entrenched powers of the West’.

Hence it can be seen that the two ‘Socialist forces’ (displayed, for instance, on that early Nazi emblem) are indeed two controlled dialectical, double-minded ‘opposites’ which have the same objectives and think along the same lines.

The Editor does NOT agree with the Nazi General Staff of 1945 that Russia and Germany can collaborate indefinitely ‘without collision of their interests’.

On the contrary, that they must collide is a certainty. This, in turn, is clearly explained in the Editor’s book ‘The European Union Collective‘ [see book section of this website for all cited titles].

But it is sufficient, for the time being, for us to understand, in Britain and America, that we have been taken for a ride, and that we had better hurry up and do something about it, before it is far too late. Resolution of Wantagate, and the associated refinancing of the United States, accompanied by the constraints on fraudulent financial transactions imposed by Basel II against the background of the Wantagate-driven on-the-books settlement, plus the tiered settlements, will greatly assist the United States’ last-minute recovery from the brink of this intended Nazi-originated, prelanned, long-range strategic catastrophe. The Settlement should be followed by a deep purge. ENDS.

YOU CAN ORDER WANTAGATE ISSUES OF OUR FINANCIAL JOURNAL AS A PACKAGE
We sell, as a special package, the relevant recent back issues of International Currency Review, containing a massive amount of information and back-up documentation, for a flat fee of $750.00, payable in advance. Please use the CONTACT US facility to place your order and send check to the London office: World Reports Limited, 108 Horseferry Road, Westminster, London SW1P 2EF, United Kingdom. Orders may also be emailed direct to the Editor at: cstory@worldreports.org.

• Another way of ordering this package is to (a) forward us a CONTACT US email requesting the package, and then (b) to order International Currency Review via the ultra-safe ordering facility at the World Reports Limited section of this website.

• Please state in the CONTACT US facility that you have ordered International Currency Review but that you specifically want to receive the Wantagate package only.

• Editor’s Note: We are still, from time to time, receiving emails from frustrated people seeking documentation to ‘back up’ what we publish in these reports. Such correspondents choose to overlook the well-known fact that we have published several huge issues of International Currency Review [SEE ABOVE] which contain hundreds of pages of facsimiles of relevant documents. Since we are a commercial operation, we cannot make these volumes available free of charge.

• However copies are available in many university and other libraries around the world, and of course they can be ordered via this website at any time. But the main point here is that complaints along these lines reveal lack of knowledge of the background, which is that an immense volume of relevant documents has been published, while these reports are approved where necessary and appropriate either by the Principals or by Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., before being posted.

LEGAL SECTION:
PLEASE READ THIS INFORMATION, AS IT INDICATES THE DEPTH OF THE DEPRAVITY THAT WANTAGATE HAS EXPOSED. REPETITION OF THIS BASIC DATA IS STILL NECESSARY…

• We now repeat, yet again, our familiar summary of the Statutes, securities regulations and fraud information that we have appended to these reports for many months. The reason we append this information is to remind everyone of their clear responsibilities under the US Misprision of Felony legislation, and of course to provide a legal basis for these reports.

LEGAL RECAPITULATION FROM REPORT DATED 30TH AUGUST 2007:
Reiteration of the fraudulent transactions involving Bank of New York Mellon – a bank so arrogant and conspicuously indifferent both to its tarnished reputation and to its grotesque breaches of US law and of N.A.S.D./S.E.C. Regulations, that it now takes first prize in the crowded competition for the title of ‘Most arrogant and corrupt financial institution in America’. At least, this was the case until the perpetration of the ‘Saturday scam’ described above and on 13th November:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• ‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON IS IN BREACH AND OF WHICH THE SIX ‘LEVY BANKS’ MAY LIKEWISE BE VARIOUSLY IN BREACH [CREDIT SUISSE, UBS, DEUTSCHE BANK, BANK OF AMERICA, CITIBANK, THE BANK OF ENGLAND]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is in violation of:
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR SIR LEO WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT THE HIGHEST U.S. LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006, AND HAVE CONTINUED THEIR SERIAL CRIMES EVER SINCE:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war

This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Wanta’s funds.

The Directors and others listed in Part 1 of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and others posted on 11th June may likewise be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious violation of the laws itemised above. This list is reproduced in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, September 2007, on pages 163-168.

U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: MISPRISION OF FELONY:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

Wicked Pedia Update dated 2nd December 2007:

WIKIPEDIA IS PART OF AN NSA DISCREDITING OPERATION
As previously reported, the Editor’s attention was drawn, in the second half of November 2007, to a pack of old lies, diversionary claptrap and disinformation posted on Wikipedia under ‘Leo Wanta’.

Although this posting appeared FOR THE FIRST TIME on 12th November 2007, it consisted almost entirely of ancient lies, including disinformation dredged out of ‘Thieves’ World’, a hatchet job published in 1994 by Simon and Schuster by the late Claire Sterling, a CIA operative.

Mrs Sterling died suddenly after being summoned for her second meeting with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, under Clinton.

ANCIENT DISCREDITED LIES POSTED IN NOVEMBER 2007
The fact that the OLD Wikipedia lies appeared for the first time as late as 12th November 2007, and consisted almost totally of old, discredited lies, omitting the Master Lie that the CIA retailed after the Ambassador had been taken down, namely that he was DEAD, indicated quite clearly to the Editor and his advisers that this latest evil display of regurgitated disinformation represented a deliberate operation by the US intelligence community’s disinformation and lie machine, to begin, all over again, the process of discrediting Ambassador Leo Wanta – so that they can relieve him of his funds by some false pretext or other after a ‘gag order’ has been signed.

The definitive up-to-date information on the Ambassador’s affairs has been published on this website, and in several issues of International Currency Review, Economic Intelligence Review, Soviet Analyst and Arab-Asian Affairs, all published by World Reports Limited, for several years. Copies of these publications are in official, institutional and library hands all over the world. Therefore, any posting about Ambassador Wanta that relies upon ancient lies and fails to take account of the accurate information that we have published, can easily be demonstrated to represent yet another US intelligence community and NSA discrediting operation.

PRELUDE TO ‘SETTING UP’ WANTA ALL OVER AGAIN
We now understand that the Principals have been advised (for the past several weeks) that they will not be allowed to reveal that they have been paid. This loony state of affairs is designed to ‘set them up’ for a future discrediting operation whereby false witness will be deployed against them to the effect that they have stolen the money, or some such pack of lies, which they will be unable to refute because they will be bound by the ‘prerequisite’ gag order that is intended. Its purpose, of course, is to ‘legitimise’ the old and new lies that the US disinformation apparat will be preparing for future use. The likelihood is that the new discrediting operation will be extended to Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., as well. We are prepared for this intended onslaught.

EDITOR’S TRUE REPORT REPEATEDLY REPLACED BY OLD LIES
On 19th November, the Editor posted on Wikipedia the accurate text about Leo Wanta that is now reproduced below. The Editor’s accurate text was then removed by Wikipedia, leaving the ‘old lies’ that had existed previously. When the Editor became aware of this, he reposted the accurate text below, and, given that his own copy had been deleted, he then deleted the pack of lies, leaving his own accurate text up on the Wikipedia site instead, without the lies.

On 2nd December, the Editor was advised by a monitor that the Editor’s accurate text had been removed and that the old discrediting lies had been reposted on the page by Wikipedia. When the Editor checked, he found that the page could no longer be edited because of what the site managers described as ‘vandalism’.

IT’S ‘VANDALISM’ TO POST THE TRUTH, NOT ‘VANDALISM’ TO POST LIES
It was not ‘vandalism’ to delete the truth and to replace the truth by old lies, but it was ‘vandalism’ to delete ‘old lies’ and replace them by the truth.

We are therefore able to conclude from this Wicked Pedia outrage, as follows:

1. Wikipedia, which purports to ‘change the world’, prefers lies to the truth.

2. Wikipedia is therefore, by definition, a source of disinformation and lies, and cannot be trusted as a source of reliable information in any context.

3. The only category of sick society that would have any interest in disseminating lies about Ambassador Wanta, the United States’ greatest living patriot, rather than the truth, is the mentally disturbed US counterintelligence disinformation apparat (a.k.a. the US STUPIDITY COMMUNITY) which, by its actions in deleting the Editor’s ACCURATE information and replacing it with old lies, and by its illegal behaviour in ‘snipping’ our website texts as stated above, thereby reveals the desperation of its concerns, which all have to do with covering up official criminality.

4. It is now far too late for the US stupidity community to repair the damage that it has done since June 2006, when the Ambassador’s funds were first hijacked by the criminal financial operative Henry M. Paulson, US Treasury Secretary. So it is laying the groundwork for a renewed discrediting operation against Ambassador Wanta and his colleagues.

• We and others will see to it that this intention is defeated, and that such nefarious scheming is exposed for the amoral and disgusting Luciferian behaviour that it represents.

The ACCURATE text that the Editor posted on the Wikipedia site, follows. (The Editor, after all, PAID FOR AMBASSADOR WANTA’S EXIT FROM PROBATION, FOR GOODNESS SAKE, SO HE CAN HARDLY BE A SOURCE OF DISINFORMATION, CAN HE?). This information will be very widely distributed by other means, in order to provide all concerned with the necessary ‘heads-up’ as to what these US Dark Forces have in mind. They are out of their minds and in Satan’s mind:

The disinformation about Leo Wanta (Lee Wanta) below was first posted on 12th November 2007. It contains ancient CIA disinformation and long since exposed lies going back to the early 1990s, and obfuscates the truth. The report appended immediately below was added on 19th November 2007, to correct the disinformation contained in the original stub.

It was subsequently removed and is hereby replaced. This sequence of events, which suggests that egregious lies are preferred to the truth, has been recorded on www.worldreports.org, which contains all the updated and breaking Wanta material, that was ignored and traduced in the stub at the foot of this report.

THE ACCURATE TEXT THAT WIKIPEDIA REPEATEDLY DELETED
This is the correct information that we posted on 19th November 2007:

The ‘information’ posted below represents a deliberately malevolent, false disinformation picture which has no bearing on reality. It is a travesty of the truth of the matter and cites Christopher Story as the author of some of the disinformation, which is libellous and implies that Story, the veteran
Editor of International Currency Review of nearly 40 years’ standing, is engaged in the egregious dissemination of lies, which is not the case.

This is such an egregiously malevolent stub of disinformation that readers should prudently dismiss it altogether; they should start afresh by accessing Christopher Story‘s website, which is: www.worldreports.org., reading from the Archive.

www.worldreports.org is the authoritative source for all updated information on Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta. The source ‘Thieves’ World’ was a CIA disinformation work prepared by the late CIA disinformation operative Claire Sterling, published in 1994.

This stub regurgitates ancient lies perpetrated by the CIA, which lied for many years that Lee (Leo being his intelligence community name) Wanta was dead. The CIA proclaimed that he was dead so that corrupt cadres could ransack his funds (see below).

He ‘ceased to be dead’ with effect from 21st July 2005 after Christopher Story, a British private citizen, had paid $35,000 from his scarce private funds pro bono publico by way of ‘restitution’ to an American lawyer for onward payment to the Wisconsin State Department of Corrections, to procure Mr Wanta’s release from his illegal probation.

Despite his Ambassadorial status, Wanta had been illegally ‘taken down’ in Switzerland on 7th July 1993 without a warrant on a trumped-up Wisconsin State charge of having failed to pay $14,129 in falsely assessed Wisconsin State fabricated tax that he never owed because he had been resident in Vienna on US Presidential intelligence work since June 1988.

This data is all in the public domain, has been published for several years in International Currency Review, the Journal of the World Financial Community, and can be read on Mr Story’s website.

International Currency Review is a banking and financial journal with a worldwide circulation:
ISSN 0020-6490. It is published by World Reports Limited, London.

Notwithstanding that this fabricated tax demand (orchestrated by US criminal intelligence) had been paid twice under protest by Lee Emil Wanta from abroad (in May and June 1992), the funds were improperly allocated by the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue and were never credited to the false account maintained by them for the Ambassador. (Christopher Story holds documentary
proof of both payments). They were paid a third time by Christopher Story in June 2005, which action duly procured Mr Wanta’s release from illegal probation effective 14th November 2005.

As a consequence of Wanta thus ceasing to be dead, the CIA’s lie that he was dead collapsed in chaos, and all the subsidiary old false witness lies that the CIA had perpetrated, including those assembled for disinformation purposes in the stub below (which, in line with the standard false witness used throughout by detractors, attempts to portray Christopher Story as a source of disinformation) were discredited as well.

Why was Wanta taken down? So that the criminal intelligence cadres running the US Government could ransack the $27.5 trillion of funds assembled by Leo Wanta on President Reagan’s orders, in the course of his Financial Warfare operations against the USSR.

Under Reagan’s Executive Order 12333 of 1981, US intelligence officers were permitted to establish corporations which could thereafter contract with the CIA/DIA/DEA/NSA et al for the purpose of fulfilling allotted intelligence tasks allocated to them.

The financial proceeds of operations conducted by such corporations were consequently the property of the corporations and thus of their shareholders, a legal fact of life which has never been, and cannot be, disputed. This was not a good idea because almost all US intelligence
operatives are liars and do not function on the basis of the Rule of Law at all, if they can help it.

Lee Wanta is the well-known patriotic exception to this rule: he operates solely in accordance with US law, in contrast to the behaviour of other US operatives, which is why the kakocracy* needed to remove him from the scene, as duly occurred July 1993.

Once Wanta had been illegally arrested (contrary to international law, as a diplomat) and then thrown into a stinking Swiss jail on 7th July 1993, the criminal cadres inside the US official structures immediately ransacked Mr Wanta’s bank accounts according to plan.

The history of this matter is, and has been, elaborated in great depth on Christopher Story‘s website www.worldreports.org. and has been extensively published, as mentioned, in International Currency Review and other World Reports Limited intelligence publications.

Students are advised perhaps to begin with the ‘Wisconsingate’ report dated 6th August 2007, which forensically dissects, with detailed documentary back-up, the Wisconsin Department of Revenue’s tax fabrication operation against Wanta, stretching back for over 20 years, that has been exposed by Christopher Story in minute detail, and which formed the fabricated basis for Wanta’s illegal takedown in 1993, despite the fact that Wisconsin has no jurisdiction beyond its borders.

The overall Wantagate crisis, which is the sole and continuing underlying cause of the prevailing global financial and economic day of reckoning that the world is now facing, has been triggered by the fact that the George W. Bush Jr. White House, aided and abetted by other senior office-holders, hijacked the compromise financial settlement of $4.5 trillion that the White House itself agreed (in a classified accord that was finalised in May 2006) should be paid over to Ambassador Wanta, so that the stolen and diverted remaining $23 trillion of his funds (and the many hundreds of trillions of dollars hypothecated upon them) could be released from a de facto lien arising from the collapse of the CIA’s lie that Wanta was dead.

For clearly, since he had ceased to be dead, 100% of these funds (plus the hundreds of trillions of fiat ‘funny’ money generated by illegal leveraged operations from that base) belonged to Lee Wanta and to no-one else: a situation that the banks ‘could not handle’.

The entire narrative of what has become the worst financial corruption crisis in world history (which this stub consisting of disinformation attempts to obfuscate) is set out in great detail on Christopher Story‘s website www.worldreports.org., to which all readers are directed in order for the accurate state of affairs to be understood. As indicated, this stub below is a travesty and a disgrace, as it regurgitates long since discredited CIA lies, presents a diversionary, distorted and misleading picture, and because it malevolently incorporates Christopher Story as a source for some of this disinformation.

It is a disgusting instance of ignorant and malevolent US counterintelligence disinformation and deceit at its very worst.

All the statements in the above commentary may be verified by reference to www.worldreports.org and International Currency Review. Another publication covering this matter in detail is Economic Intelligence Review, also published by World Reports Limited, London. Wanta students should access the Archive on the www.worldreports.org Home Page.

A book devoted to Ambassador Wanta and the Wantagate crisis is in preparation

The Wanta disinformation referred to above has been deleted from this page. ENDS.

DIPLOMATIC STATUS OF THE PRINCIPALS
The Ambassador and his colleagues now have special diplomatic status (conferred upon them by HM The Queen in 2007), which means that the Ambassador is now an Ambassador several times over. This factor greatly complicates the intended discrediting offensive that the mad US stupidity community’s Dark Forces contemplate, their sole objective being of course to cover up their own criminality, in line with pending ‘thought crime’ legislation which has the same Nazi-style objective.

*Note: ‘Kakocracy’: Governance by a clique representing the worst elements of society, in their interests and to the exclusion of all other interests, from the Greek, kakos, meaning foul, or filthy.

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier Wantagate reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

Advertisements

One thought on “ DID BROWN BOTHER TO READ THE LISBON E.U. TREATY?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s