Monday 3 March 2008 22:36








By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for our ‘Wantagate’ reports since April 2006.

• The white panel below NEWS gives details of our intelligence titles as they are published.

• FORTHCOMING WANTAGATE ISSUE OF INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW: We are preparing a very extensive issue of the financial journal in which every stage of this crisis since June last year will be displayed. This issue will be mailed to subscribers worldwide in the first quarter of this year, and will provide a permanent record, which cannot be expunged, of the multiple twists and turns of this historically unprecedented criminalism crisis, with every sordid detail recorded both for immediate further enlightenment, for future study, and for posterity.

Not a single facet of this hideous crisis has been left out of the record, so that no attempt to cover up what has been going on, is possible. Subscribers will receive their issues under their current arrangements. Others who wish to receive this special issue should use the Contact Us facility on this website to ask for details and specify how many copies of this huge report/issue they would like to receive. Book early while stocks last. We will not be sending free copies: details on request. Order your copy EARLY! This is such a huge undertaking that we have to restrict the print run.

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing financial global corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Our Wantagate reports have been calling all the shots, given the hijacking of Wanta’s Settlement.

• This is the 97th Wantagate report: well over a million words to date.

• BOOKS: ‘The Red Terror in Russia’, by Sergey Melgounov, is published by Edward Harle Limited and available via this combined website. It describes what the Dark Forces pulled off in Russia, and what they may have in mind for the United States and Britain (a.k.a. ‘the Main Enemy’) if we do not pull ourselves together. See also the Editor’s 740-PAGE book ‘The New Underworld Order’, for the detailed background on the World Revolution crisis that we are all living through.

• Note: Kindly keep on not shooting the messenger. The following report is based upon our best information and belief. If matters turn out differently, or the timeframe changes, as has occurred since 9th February, this will reflect developments AFTER collection of the intelligence contained herein. We have flies on walls all over the place, but sometimes they may be on the wrong walls, or the right walls at the wrong time. Abusive, rude and anonymous emails are forwarded to a separate box and are held with the option of exposing their provenance should we so decide. Which we may.


‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

Note: For convenience, this report is effectively divided into two sections.

• The first part of the text, after the introduction, summarises findings as culled from our own special sources, hopefully denuded of disinformation.

• The second section, termed the Main intelligence Section, contains special information which reveals the full overall picture of the ‘bait and switch’ treachery which is taking place.

Comments on the character and expertise of Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., the Executive Vice President and Treasurer of Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta’s Commonwealth of Virginia-based corporation, AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., are based upon the Editor’s personal observations and considered assessments over a period of several years.

According to multiple sources special to this service, a final struggle is under way in the United States to terminate The Wanta Plan, to stall implementation of the Basel II banking reforms, to steal all Ambassador Wanta’s money, and to capture and keep the entire estimated $400 trillion of funds that the long-delayed Settlements are to deliver overall, in history’s biggest-ever refinancing.

This report is intended to explain what the criminal forces have in mind, how they intend to achieve this evil objective, and how they are placing Ambassador Wanta under duress in order to double-cross him and all concerned with the resolution of this historically unprecedented crisis. They may also be intending to carry out this putsch under cover of military operations in the Middle East.

We call this US intelligence offensive ‘Operation Double-Cross’. Its purpose is nothing less than the seizure and final unlawful retention of ALL the funds, and the defeat of those who have been standing up to the organised criminal cadres that control the American Government at the highest levels, inside the intelligence community, and in the banks. In the process, they may intend to deprive Ambassador Wanta of everything he has fought for these past 15 years, before finally disposing of him altogether, as they did his Chinese partner, Howie Kwong Kok, back in 1992.

If ‘Operation Double-Cross’ succeeds, the world will be plunged into a crisis of unprecedented proportions, as we first predicted in our posting dated 2nd September 2006. There are ominous immediate signs of this happening. For instance, the FDIC has a list of 76 US banks which it expects to fail at any time, as they are operating below minimum capital requirements. Military sources tell us that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) itself is on the brink of collapse.

In Oakland, CA, a house which sold for $420,000 in 2005 is on the market for $119,00, and is not expected to achieve the listed price. In Detroit, there are several homes on the market for $100.

We will be explaining how the Bush and Clinton Crime Families, and their criminalised associates inside the US intelligence community and the banks, intend to double-cross the following parties:

• Ambassador Leo/Lee Emil Wanta (with his unwitting cooperation, under duress).

• Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., the US securities industry expert who is Executive Vice President and Treasurer of Ambassador Wanta’s Virginia-based corporation AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., incorporated by the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission on 20th May 2004.

• Her Majesty The Queen.

• Christopher Edward Harle Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher and the writer of all the Wantagate reports posted on this website, who loaned Ambassador Wanta $35,000 of his own scarce private funds for two years, ending on 10th June 2007, which have not been repaid. The Trustee of these funds is CIA Attorney Steven Goodwin of Richmond Virginia.

• The Reagan-Mitterrand Protocol and other leading country payees.

• The 160 countries whose representatives were reported last week to be still in New York.

• The IMF/Prosperity Programme payees and all the other ‘Tier’ payees

• The World Court.

• The US Supreme Court, which has thrown in its lot with the World Court, having indicated to the Bush Crime Family that quote ‘we are not going down with you’ unquote.

• The US Treasury.

• The American people.

The tactical characteristics of this ‘Operation Double-Cross’ can be described as a psychological warfare attack upon the cohesion of Ambassador Wanta, Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., their closest associates (and by further arms’-length association, the Editor of this service), with the objective of ensuring that ALL the funds can be stolen FOR GOOD.

The DIABOLICAL feature of what is intended is that it has been calculated that the ‘best’ way to seize the entire $400 trillion-odd is to have the international community unwittingly pay the funds, so to speak, directly into the hands of the organised criminal cadres. Once that happens, so the criminal mentality behind ‘Operation Double-Cross’ has concluded, no-one will ever be able to do anything about it. It will be ‘game, set and match’.

Ambassador Wanta is being used as the patsy to ‘make this happen’. He is being placed under duress by the intelligence community and made to agree to steps which will guarantee the folding of The Wanta Plan, the stealing of all his settlement funds, and the shelving of Basel II – as well as the unlawful seizure of all the other monies.

Ambassador Wanta’s alleged willingness, under duress, as reported by multiple sources, to go along with the malevolent (see below) scheme that has been put to him, jeopardises the Wanta Settlement funds, which will be stolen; and this will ensure that the entire world will experience the worst conceivable outcome, which Wanta has spent that past 15 years struggling to prevent.

• Quite simply, Ambassador Wanta is being blackmailed.

Moreover this intelligence putsch is being perpetrated at the very moment that the International Monetary Fund, the US military, the World Court and the Group of Nine++ financial powers are engaged, in lock-step, in seeking to force payment of the Settlements, failing which the G-9 have threatened to reimpose sanctions against the United States (see below). The intention may be to pull off this coup under cover of aggressive military operations in the Middle East, which could easily escalate into a World War, according to several foreign international sources.

At the very least, US sabre-rattling in the Middle East region may be intended to deflect the G-9 from applying sanctions at a time of heightened international tension. That’s what we believe.

The parties listed above are now in extreme danger of procuring the Settlement payments, only to watch as THE WHOLE LOT IS STOLEN FOR GOOD. There is only ONE PERSON IN THE WORLD who can stop this happening: AMBASSADOR LEE EMIL WANTA.

This report is therefore aimed at ensuring that common sense prevails at the very last moment, as the Ambassador has it within his power either to launch the whole world onto a sustainable path of prosperity for a generation, or else to ensure an international catastrophe by allowing the funds to fall permanently into the hands of the criminal forces that have destroyed the past 15 years of his life and stolen all his money.

Right now, we understand, he may be making the WRONG DECISION. His position may well be delicate, but taking millennial decisions under duress is not a good idea. In this Editor’s opinion (and experience), when under duress, the right thing to do is the right thing. This normally has the effect of forcing the enemy back on its heels.

It is the Editor’s experience that when one stands up to those who have malevolent and devious designs, and may even (in this case) be engaged in blackmail, they are usually so shocked that they ‘back off’. Michael C. Cottrell’s principled stand against them all these years has had precisely that outcome, as has the Ambassador’s own brave resistance to the crude abominations to which his treacherous colleagues have subjected him. Now, therefore, is NOT the time to CAVE IN.

Of course they are putting Mr Wanta under duress. That is what they do. And furthermore, they do this when they calculate that the victim is at his most vulnerable – which may be the case right now.

Mr Wanta, a religious man, will recall the following Scripture:

‘When Jesus had spoken these words, he went forth over the brook Cedron, where was a garden, into the which he entered, he and his disciples.

And Judas also, which betrayed him, knew the place: for Jesus oft-times resorted thither with his disciples.

Judas then, having received a band of men and officers from the chief priests and Pharisees, cometh thither with lanterns and torches and weapons.

Jesus therefore, knowing all things that should come upon him, went forth, and said unto them, Whom seek ye?

They answered him, Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus saith unto them, I am he. And Judas also, which betrayed him, stood with them.

As soon then as he had said unto them, I am he, they went backward, and fell to the ground’.
John, Chapter 18, verses 1-6

Ambassador Wanta faces a simple choice right now. It is no exaggeration to assert that the decision he makes will affect the future of the whole world.

• He can continue with the existing Wanta Plan structure based upon the SECURE corporate securities account with the world-ranking US securities expert Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., as his Executive Vice President and Treasurer, which will ensure that trading, financing and special projects for the benefit of the American people can go ahead, finally, as planned – so that the catastrophe that faces the United States due to the depredations of the corrupt and deceitful criminalist cadres is overcome thanks to those massive taxed on-the-books windfall tax payments that will accrue to the US Treasury, and to the parallel implementation of the huge refinancing operation for the United States and the whole world that will be unleashed.

• IF he removes Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., as Treasurer, and replaces him with an inferior product, or changes the existing settled arrangements, as is believed to be intended, under pressure from his untrustworthy intelligence sector advisers – the Wanta Plan will be folded, the Settlements will never take place, ALL the money will be stolen, the United States will stumble into a depression, the world economy will reel into semi-coherence, inflation will move into double digits everywhere, and Ambassador Wanta will be seen to have been the cause of this catastrophe because HE TOOK THE WRONG DECISION. That would be a tragedy without parallel in modern history.

And the Editor of this service, who operates at arms’ length, will then have to portray Ambassador Wanta, who could have saved the world from catastrophe, as the tragic patriot who took the wrong decision under duress and pressure from his unreliable intelligence community peers.

We will elaborate below how we arrive at this alarming conclusion.

But first, the message, therefore, is this:


• If he likes the taste of rat poison (used in the murder of Howie), then presumably he should follow the advice of these Pied Pipers.

But not otherwise.

• Ambassador Wanta therefore holds the fate of the United States and the whole world in his hands. If he continues, under this duress, down the path that he appears to be contemplating, according to our multiple reports, he will destroy everything that he has fought for since being taken down in July 1993, and he will be double-crossed and hung out to dry with nothing except a wasted life to show for it. They couldn’t care less.

• Why are we publishing this harsh information? Because Ambassador Wanta, who is reported by the sources as being under pressure from these operatives, may not be listening. According to what we understand, he may be taking tainted advice from the very type of people who scammed , exploited, stole from him and abused him before.

He may be falling for their syrupy blandishments, which amount to a form of blackmail. He should, in the Editor’s opinion, change his approach IMMEDIATELY, before he is manoeuvred into watching everything being destroyed – because if he follows this dubious double-cross course, into which he appears to be sleep-walking under duress, he himself will be double-crossed and he will regret what he has done for the rest of what will then remain of his life (which may not be a lot). We are merely reporting what we have observed from previous cases known to us: and we are not the only observers who are concerned at this turn of events.

• Nor should the Ambassador be concerned that any change of course from the perilous direction in which he is now walking, would make him look weak. Who cares what these people may choose to think? He has been abused and trampled on, subjected to numerous attempts on his life, and yet has miraculously escaped the very worst outcomes. He should not worry about what these people think of him: that is THEIR problem, not his. He should stick to the existing arrangements and not yield to these dangerous people. He may consider them to be intelligence community colleagues, but surely that in itself should be enough to ensure that he understands that they are likely to be setting him up. After all, that is what they do. They have no other modus operandi.

The Ambassador knows all about ‘bait and switch’. Yet it appears, according to our reports, that he cannot perceive when this standard Luciferian technique is being applied to HIM. If he falls for the trick this time, in the face of the effective blackmail operation against him, the consequences for himself, the United States and the whole of humanity will be terrible, as this report explains.

Yet here he is, as reported to us, toying with throwing everything away just because the scheming, criminalised intelligence classes don’t like Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. The reason they don’t like Mr Cottrell, is very SIMPLE: he has called their criminal bluff, has stood up to them, has exposed their unlawful operations, and has never yielded an inch.

The Ambassador, who spent 40 days in Mr Cottrell’s company last fall (incurring a huge hotel bill which Mr Cottrell is having to pay), should reflect, before it is too late, that his understandable anxiety to bring this matter to a conclusion and to ‘get back into the game’, at any cost, is risking not only his Settlement (which these people will steal) but also the future of the United States and the whole world. We cannot believe that he does not understand this reality.

The Editor therefore appeals urgently to Mr Wanta – who has benefited not only from the huge hotel bill incurred by Mr Cottrell (believed to be of the order of $14,000), but also from the Editor’s loan funds of $35,000 which ought to have been repaid on 11th June 2007, have not been repaid, and have been stolen by the Wisconsin Department of Revenue – to think again.

If he makes the wrong decision now, as by all accounts he is doing or is about to do, under duress, he may wreck his chances of retaining custody of his agreed-upon funds, will lose control of them because he will be wallowing in the corrupt banking sector which relieved him of his original $27.5 trillion, and will therefore be unable to proceed inter alia with any of the projects agreed with Mr Cottrell’s Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. under their Private Joint Venture Agreement dated 30th December 2005, and with fresh projects for the benefit of the American people, whom he seeks once again to serve. The projects in question have already been delayed for years.

No doubt unsolicited advice from a rank outsider may be unwelcome: but, given the catastrophic state of affairs that will ensue if the funds are stolen for good and the refinancing of the United States and the world economy, backed by Basel II, does not begin immediately, what other choice does this Editor have? Our job is to monitor the evolution of the international financial economy for the benefit of our subscribers: and since the Editor has had a specific role to play in this crisis for several years, this is all the more reason why his unsolicited advice must be placed on record.

The Ambassador, no doubt under advice, severed his contacts with the Editor several months ago. We understand his position. However, one doubtless ‘unintended’ consequence is that the only way that the Editor’s considered assessments can be placed before him, as in the past, is by means of the electronic and printed word.

Projects for the benefit of the American people, agreed upon under the Private Joint Venture, and others that have been planned, will collapse if Mr Wanta now succumbs to the blackmail pressures being exerted upon him to amend the existing business structure – because new arrangements that he is reported to be contemplating are designed to deceive, double-cross, scam and terminate him once and for all. At the very least, he may be taking an extreme risk in following the primrose path down which his advisers are reported by our several sources, to be pushing him.

Assuming that the Ambassador’s familiar common sense finally prevails, he should not be deterred from pulling back, due to the publicity generated by this report. The reason he should not hesitate, and should not be concerned about what his advisers are saying and proposing, is that their real objective is to deceive him, as he was deceived and taken down before.

It was not for nothing that Colonel Dana Wilcox said to the Editor of this service, when we were together in Alexandria last October, that ‘Leo Wanta is his own worst enemy’. This assessment, unfortunately, appears to be correct.

While we are on the subject of corporate matters, Attorney Steven Goodwin, the Secretary of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., is also Trustee of the Editor’s $35,000 Escrow Agreement dated 14th July 2005 and of the Promissory Note referencing the Editor’s loan funds dated 9th June 2005. The private loan was extended at 7.00% annual interest for two years, ending on 10th June 2007, but has not been repaid. That is an outrage.

The Editor accordingly holds both men accountable for these loan funds and will manifestly require reimbursement. He does not agree with the cynical comment made to him by Mrs Linda Fanton, who previously assisted the Editor and the Ambassador before she abandoned both, that ‘you can wave goodbye to that money’. All concerned are hereby placed on notice that such cynicism and financial irresponsibility will not be tolerated. British people don’t buy into that attitude.

In this connection, the Editor’s British accountant, Douglas Heydon, wrote on 10th December 2007 to Mr Goodwin, of Goodwin, Sutton & Duval, PC, 5516 Falmouth Street, Suite 108, Richmond, Virginia 23230, enquiring about the Editor’s funds and information about their disposition.

Mr Heydon wrote again on 18th January 2008; and as of this date he had received no response. We understand that Mr Goodwin has been ‘instructed’ not to reply. Whether he has been so instructed or not, he is the Trustee of the Editor’s funds and as an Attorney he is expected to respond to enquiries from a qualified accountant. Failing to do so is both unprofessional and reprehensible.

No doubt the duplicitous CIA intention behind this arrangement was to provoke the Editor of this service to ‘turn on’ the Ambassador for the return of his funds with the agreed-upon interest: that is the sort of dirty trick these people play. Unfortunately for whoever Mr Goodwin’s handler may be, this is not going to happen. Goodwin is the Trustee and he must perform. The two cited and rudely unanswered letters from Mr Heydon will now appear on pages 198-199 of the forthcoming massive Wantagate-only issue of International Currency Review, which will be mailed worldwide to existing official, banking sector, investment and new subscribers in the near future.

Given what this Editor has done to prise the Ambassador out of the hole that his colleagues had ruthlessly discarded him into, any deviation from Mr Wanta’s previous settled loyalties in favour, under duress, of a new ‘switch’, will send signals to all the relevant quarters that he cannot be trusted. That would be a sad let-down after all that he has done for America and the West.

We know that such an impression would be unwarranted. The reason he was ‘taken down’ in July 1993 by the organised criminal cadres led by the Clinton and Bush Crime Families was precisely that he would not ‘go along’ with their criminal operations. He would not contravene US law.

There are just TWO reasons why progress has been made with ALL the Settlements since the Editor took the risky action to pay $35,000 to haul the Ambassador out of his unlawful probation:

• The adamant refusal of Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. to succumb to pressures to deviate from ‘the regs’, and his principled adherence to the Securities regulations and the Rule of Law.

• The 98 Wantagate reports which the Editor of this service has voluntarily written, so far free of charge, pro bono publico, posted and published in order to complete what he started when he made the $35,000 available for the salvation of the Ambassador.

No doubt another cynical calculation in certain minds may have been that Christopher Story would never write a report such as the present one, because he wants his $35,000 back with the agreed-upon interest. Wrong. ‘What I have started, I will finish’, to coin a famous phrase.

Likewise, it may, we surmise, have been calculated that Mr Cottrell will go along with the scheming behind his back which will leave him and his family vulnerable to the identical. typical US criminal intelligence ‘bait and switch’ stitch-up that may be intended for the Ambassador, in due course (explained below: how they will do it). Wrong. We understand that the position is that if Mr Cottrell is not trusted, which is absurd, then the game is over.

Our close observation of this man for several years, during which time he has never deceived the Editor, is that he is a man of the highest integrity and principle – which the criminal classes detest – and that this is precisely why the Ambassador MUST retain his services.

If he does not, just because the criminalist cadres don’t like him, as a man of principle unlike them, Mr Wanta will rapidly be scammed and will sink without trace.

No doubt the intelligence community doesn’t like the Editor of this service either: but that is their problem. If they could see that their endless lies, double-dealing, scamming, double-crossing, ‘bait and switch’ behaviour, and all the other unfettered abominations that pour out of the George Bush Center for Intelligence (a.k.a. Exploitation) in Langley, were cumulatively counter-productive, and that they stink in the nostrils of the whole world, especially following these Wantagate exposures of their serial corruption, they might start to dig themselves out of the ordure in which they are wallowing. The world’s dreadful opinion of them is of their own perverse making.

For starters, the CIA will have to consider renaming Langley, because, all of a sudden, they won’t want to be tarred with Bush’s brush any longer.

Fancy falling so stupidly for the DVD’s biggest, boldest coup: the naming of the CIA’s HQ after the representative of pan-German ‘Black’ counterintelligence. How stupid is that?

We have always been told that, cunning and duplicitous through so many of these people are, they are fundamentally stupid. Their stupidity stems from the fact that they do not appear to understand that all lies have a half-life, like plutonium. The Editor’s 40+ years’ observational experience has led him to the conclusion that the average half-life of a state lie is seven years.

The REASON the criminalist intelligence cadres don’t like Mr Cottrell is precisely that he, like the Editor knows the Ambassador to be, is trustworthy, a man of principle, a securities technician of the highest calibre, and someone who can often see through deception before the deceiver has even presented it to him. It appears that the Ambassador cannot, at present, see that he is being set up. He may need to put on a new pair of spectacles and see the trees beyond the wood. Acting hastily under duress will have fateful and terminal consequences.

This is not just a matter for the Ambassador: the fate of the whole world is at stake.

The Editor is not expecting Mr Wanta to double-cross him. However in the unlikely event that it turns out that he has done so, the Editor will necessarily make this fact public for all the world to see. It is already a fact that the telephone number, which the Ambassador graciously gave to the Editor in 2005, saying ‘not many people have this number’, is now inoperative.

There may be reasons for this, but it could be interpreted as unfortunate, to say the least.

In summary, all concerned need to ‘sit up and take notice’: you are running grave risks. If these risks were simply to affect a few expendable individuals, that would be ‘one thing’. But since the risks being run will affect the whole world, ALMOST IMMEDIATELY, it is essential that the present foolish, gadarene rush to oblivion be STOPPED NOW.

The United States desperately needs refinancing, after the rapine and pillage perpetrated by the organised criminal cadres that have ransacked the country from their supposedly impregnable positions in high office. The Wanta Plan is the ONLY way forward. The alternative that the corrupt intelligence cadres intend to try to impose will guarantee a US and global economic and financial catastrophe, and will temporarily empower these dark forces, who stand, ‘as we speak’ on the verge of a huge setback. The are not accustomed to setbacks, or to any opposition.

‘Operation Double-Cross’ must NOT be allowed to succeed. You are above this, Mr Wanta. You can count your true friends on less than one hand. Your current advisers are NOT your friends: they intend to scam you, exploit you, compromise you, discard you, and probably to do away with you altogether. The Editor can read their minds. He has been doing this for many years.

The essence of Mr Cottrell’s contribution all along has been his insistence that the funds are held in a corporate securities account, so that they are governed by the securities regime, on which Mr Cottrell is a world-level expert, and not by the porous and wholly unreliable banking environment

Ambassador Wanta’s universally recognised brilliance does not extend to his ability to hold on to funds which have been stolen from him. The criminal intelligence cadres stole his money FROM BANK ACCOUNTS before, and they intend to do so again, because Lee Wanta is reportedly being persuaded by these untrustworthy operatives, under duress, that US banking arrangements are sufficient. They are NOT: not with these sharks around.

The World Court, the G-9 and the international community generally need to understand, at this extremely late stage, that the only way the funds can be held safely out of the reach of the criminal cadres in the banks and the corrupt and unreformed US intelligence community, is for the funds to be held in a corporate securities account. Given the endemic corruption within the US banking system, the funds could never be safe in any straight US bank account.

The corporate securities account arrangements made for AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., provide the necessary assurance and security. The corporate securities account was made available to the Ambassador by Morgan Stanley because Mr Cottrell is a fully qualified securities professional and expert, and already holds a corporate securities account for his own company. Activation of The Wanta Plan is predicated upon the use of the corporate securities account, without which all the Wanta ‘compromise’ money will be stolen.

As will be seen from what follows, the World Court has taken charge of demanding and enforcing the Wanta payment (and parallel Settlements) JUST AS the criminal intelligence cadres may have persuaded Ambassador Wanta, under duress, to dump Mr Cottrell, which will ensure that Mr Wanta will be left in due course with nothing. It may also mean that he will later be ‘disposed of’.

Unfortunately, the Ambassador appears to have fallen for these corrupt blandishments, just at the moment (see below) when decisive action may be taken to enforce the payment.

Looked at the other way round, achievement by the World Court and by the G-9 countries of the Settlements, which has been their focus all along, may in practice remit the funds into the hands of the organised criminal intelligence cadres – thanks to the apparent success of the criminalists with their long-standing offensive to split the Ambassador from Mr Cottrell, whose securities expertise and trustworthiness is the only true protection that the Ambassador has from being left penniless, followed as usual with these evil people, by elimination.

It is also a FACT that these people specialise in creating divisions and tension between partners, in every context. They do this for exclusively malevolent reasons – so that THEY can profit from the consequences.That is what they are seeking to achieve: it has been their intention to split the two, all along. According to reports received, they are on the way to succeeding.

For, unfortunately, the Ambassador has signed certain papers which more or less ensure that this offensive is a fait accompli. He must pull back immediately, or he can expect to suffer the worst possible outcome over time, if past experience is any guide.

No assurances from any of these people can be relied upon. Various CIA operatives known to us by name, including one who provides services to the Ambassador to this very day, have systematically stolen from Ambassador Wanta’s bank accounts in the past. They and their like will do so again.

The overall objectives of what is intended include the abolition of the Wanta Plan, the scrapping of the Basel II banking reforms, the final abrogation of the accord with Ambassador Wanta reached in May 2006 providing for his ‘compromise’ $4.5 trillion payment, separation of the Ambassador from Michael C. Cottrell. M.S., so that the criminalists encounter no further opposition to their schemes to relieve Wanta of all the funds, the stealing of the ‘compromise’ Wanta $4.5 trillion, the hijacking of all the G-8 country and Protocol payments, the stealing of the entire original $27.5 trillion owned by Ambassador Wanta as sole Principal, the stealing of all the fiat off-balance sheet, untaxed funds leveraged from the thievery and exploitation of the Ambassador’s $27.5 trillion, holding onto and stealing the investments of the IMF and Prosperity Programmes and other scam/Ponzi operations mounted by the kleptocracy so that none of the estimated 350,000 payees receive a penny, holding on to those investors’ capital funds, depriving the 160 payee countries of all their agreed-upon Protocol and other payments – and, when everything has been ‘taken care of’, the disposal, on the basis of past practice, of Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta by murder, as they disposed of his Chinese intelligence partner, Howie Kwong Kok. This will be followed, if possible the liquidation of Michael C. Cottrell M.S. and Christopher Story as well. At least, that is what they may have in mind.

If these are NOT the evil intentions underlying this blackmail, its is prudent to assume that they ARE – on the basis of what we know about how these people operate.

For this desperate throw of the dice, the cornered criminalist cadres and financial fraudsters directed by the Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD, Dachau) operative, former President George H. W. Bush Jr., Bush Sr.’s chief handler (Vice President Richard B. Cheney), and their criminalist associates, have persuaded Ambassador Lee Wanta, under duress, to go along blindly with their duplicitous plans – with Wanta perhaps blissfully unaware that he is in the process of being set up as happened before, and will be dumped at the first opportunity, once he has realised that his control over the money is illusory. And that won’t be long after the Settlement (see below).

Given that the Ambassador has been messed about with now for 15 years, since he was unlawfully taken down in Lausanne on 7th July 1993, his position is pitiable, and provokes great sympathy: but he is being severely misled by untrustworthy US intelligence cadres whose primary objective is to arrange matters so that he is seen to be double-crossing Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. (and, since the Ambassador has benefited from this Editor’s scarce private funds which have not been repaid, Christopher Story), whereupon he will lose control of his funds and will be unceremoniously got rid of, like his former Chinese intelligence colleague.

It is reported to us that a CIA- and Republican Party-linked Attorney may be cooperating in the double-cross operation, even though, when the Editor said last year to the Ambassador ‘I don’t trust him’, Ambassador Wanta replied: ‘You ought to’. Well, the Editor does not, and never did.

He is right and the Ambassador, unfortunately, is wrong.

It is a fact that Ambassador Wanta appears to have had precisely four friends in recent years: Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., who is the only man in the United States who can be trusted with Wanta’s money, the Editor of this service who has so far lost his private funds and has received 12 death threats in the service of the greatest US patriot of our age, one other colleague whose identity is known to this Editor, and HM The Queen. Beyond that small closed circle, all so-called ‘friends’, especially those from the corrupt US intelligence community, are sharks waiting to steal ALL his money and to ensure that he is, ONCE AGAIN, taken out of the picture – this time, for good.

Before we elaborate on how the criminal operatives – led by Mossad, DVD (cooperation between these Black intelligence organizations being a VERY long-standing, classic ‘sib’ operation (1)), the criminal cadres inside the CIA and perhaps even traitors within MI6 – intend to pull off this cynical intelligence coup to seize upwards of $400 trillion in the teeth of the determined opposition of the Group of Nine most powerful financial countries, the World Court and even the US Supreme Court, which recently informed the Bush cadres that the Justices did not intend ‘to go down with you’, here is an enumerated summary of certain recent and pertinent developments.

This (numbered, point by point) information is provided as a lead-in to the more precise information (the Main Intelligence Section) that will follow it, and offers background which the more detailed intelligence corroborates.

In other words this enumerated information should be regarded as background which is explained by the specifics that follow the numbered statements herewith:

1. On Wednesday 20th February 2008, David Walker, head of the General Accountability Office (previously the General Accounting Office), a.k.a. the Inspector General, resigned specifically because he was sick and tired of the endless deception, trickery, lies and humbug surrounding the Bush White House’s unlawful financial fraud operations and the hijacking and hold-ups affecting The Wanta Plan Settlement and the other long outstanding payments. He left to work with a new think-tank being established by Pete Peterson, a former US Treasury Secretary, who is reportedly raising $1.0 billion to fund his new operation.

2. On Sunday 24th February, Rupert Murdoch’s Sunday Times, London, whose executives once informed the veteran British journalist Gordon Thomas that they wouldn’t touch Wantagate with a thousand-foot bargepole, came out of their unprofessional shell and published a damning report featuring Frank Johnson, the Mayor of Cleveland, whose Office is suing Citigoup, Goldman Sachs. HSBC and Greenwich Capital (owned by Royal Bank of Scotland), claiming that ‘they acted like organised criminals financing the sale of products that they knew could do nothing but harm’.

• Mr Jackson is the FIRST US public official to call a corrupt spade a garden implement.

In response to this incredible surprise, the Editor emailed him full details of Wantagate and drew his staff’s attention to our report dated 26th December 2007, explaining the financial fraud model underlying the so-called ‘sub-prime’ crisis. It was clear from The Sunday Times’ article that Mr Jackson’s Office had understood the pertinent information contained therein.

3. On Monday 25th February, it was confirmed and verified to the Editor of this service that the International Monetary Fund, recently equipped with a new Managing Director from France, M. Strauss-Kahn, had been placed in overall control of the Wanta and other Settlements, backed by the World Court and two so-called ‘interested’ countries, subsequently identified to us as Russia and Japan. Both these countries’ governments consider that their treatment by the corrupt Bush-Clinton Crime Cartel represents a casus belli, and in several conversations, other parties have mentioned the possibility of a war outcome, without any prompting by the Editor of this service.

4. The IMF were supposed to have taken over the supervisory function with effect from 8.00 am EST on Friday 22nd February. The Fund ran into immediate problems from the US Treasury, which asserted that it needed authority from President Bush Jr., and ventilated other familiar excuses for non-performance – all of which, in the case of the Wanta Settlement, are nonsense because the Treasury’s ‘Treasury Direct’ instructions to Citibank to remit the $4.5 trillion into the corporate securities account with Morgan Stanley, remain unchanged.

5. In response to this typical US Treasury obstruction, the IMF allowed the Treasury an ‘extension’ to 9.00 am EST on Saturday 23rd February 2008 for the Settlement payments. When the US Treasury, as usual, failed to perform, the IMF now informed the relevant parties that it would handle all the practicalities and that the Settlements were now out of the hands of the White House, the Treasury and the Federal Reserve Banks. The Ambassador and Mr Cottrell had been advised all day on 22nd February that payment would be made that day, these undertakings being shown as usual to have been worthless. Likewise certain Trustees about which the Editor has ongoing information had been told to stand by, but to no avail (a repeated scenario given the nefarious dialectical Bush-Greenspan ‘Never-Pay’ or non-performance model described in our reports).

6. At 9.40 pm UK time on Saturday 23rd February, the Editor was informed that release of the ‘macro’ Settlement funds was supposed to have taken place by 9.00 EST. However the IMF discovered that, of the six ‘macro’ banks charged with making the initial payments, only two of them actually held the necessary funds. The other four banks were found not to have been ‘funded’.

It was also stated that the World Court had arranged for significant numbers of international law enforcement and other personnel to travel to the United States to assist in the procurement of the Settlement payments.

7. Item 4 above coincided with reports, received by the Editor at arms’-length at 9.45 pm on 25th February 2008 that $300 trillion had ‘gone missing’.

8. Following the IMF’s failure to procure the Settlement payments, the White House, the Treasury and the Federal Reserve were given until Thursday 28th February by the IMF, representing the international community in general, and the 160 payee countries in particular, to retrieve all the missing funds and to have them placed in the four unfunded banks in order to comply with the requirements of the Group of Nine countries, also representing the international community, This information was likewise provided to us on 25th February 2008 (at about 9.50 pm). The demand was accompanied by indications from diplomatic sources that high-level arrests would otherwise ensue.

9. The Israeli-American Dov Zakheim was now identified as having been ‘used as a funnel for the handling of a lot of money’, with the implication that this had been done unlawfully. Military sources also confirmed separately published assessments that the Central Intelligence Agency has been and remains decisively penetrated by Israeli intelligence, to the continuing detriment of the United States, and that a thorough reassessment of the United States’ close relations with Israel is now essential. The report to this effect was received in London on 25th February at 14:36 pm UK time.

10. After or as the deadline for absolute US compliance with the Settlement(s), set by the Group of Nine for last Thursday, passed with no payments being made, the G-9 met in what was reported to us as ‘continuous session’. At 9.40 pm UK time on 25th February, the Editor had been informed that the White House, the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve had all been given until Thursday 28th February 2008 to have the necessary funds placed in the relevant US bank accounts for onward distribution, after which the G-9 would be reconsidering all their options – having semi-suspended sanctions against the United States with each successful aborted ‘settlement scenario’ modelled upon the standard Bush-Greenspan ‘on again, off-again’ dialectical framework.

11. On 25th February, a US contact with South American connections reported that, out of the blue, a Brazilian party had stated as fact over the landline that (quote) ‘there’s some big scandal going on, that will bring the [US] election forward to May or June’.

12. On 26th February 2008, a fire broke out at the Canary Wharf, London, offices of Crédit Suisse, causing the evacuation of 5,000 employees and the suspension of operations ‘for an hour’. This latest ‘bank fire’ followed the suspension by the same bank of ‘a small number’ of traders a week earlier, who were reportedly suspected of having inflated the value of certain ‘investments’ by an estimated £1.5 billion. The Daily Telegraph [26th February 2008], reporting these developments, perpetrated an interesting ‘Freudian typo’, referring to Crédit Suisse as ‘Credit Squeeze’, and referencing the fact that its staff reporter had received no answer when he had asked whether the ‘small number’ of traders who had been ‘suspended’ could be accounted for on the morning of the fire at the bank’s Canary Wharf premises [see Note: (2) ‘Burning the evidence’]

13. At 1.05pm on Tuesday 26th February, reports were received in our London office to the effect that the Omega Group of recipients had received their ‘packages’ that morning and that Tier Three recipients would be receiving their packages by noon EST on 27th February. The Editor greeted this ‘information’ with extreme scepticism, which proved to be appropriate.

The source did elaborate, however, that it was being asserted behind the scenes (i.e., within the intelligence community) that Ambassador Wanta had been made to sign documentation on pain of forfeiting his payment (see below). Since those proffering such documentation for signature are classic Leninists (that is to say, they have no intention of honouring their side of any such bargain), to have signed any such papers, even under duress, would have been the height of folly on Leo Wanta’s part, as the documentation will have been designed for trickery purposes [see below for why this information was important].

14. Jon Moulton, head of the private equity firm Alchemy Partners (a typically Rosicrucian title) told the SuperReturn 2008 Hedge Fund conference in Munich on 26th February that ‘there will be large private equity failures this year. Absolutely guaranteed. This is a cyclical downturn for the industry. We are going to have very weak returns for a while. Companies will go bust and that is going to be a problem. We have got some savagely leveraged companies out there and, unless something else happens to distract them, the politicians will be back and we can look forward to more regulation and tax damaging this business’.

Interestingly, Mr Moulton blasted his own so-called ‘industry’, although he failed to mention the word ‘criminal’. He added: ‘Buyouts were done on the basis of mythical numbers like pro-forma, adjusted, normalised EBITDA, which almost always turns out to be 20% higher than reality. We were buying false numbers and doing it willingly, but the quality of what we were doing had come down. It’s the same thing that was going on in the US sub-prime market’.

Well, of course that last statement is completely inaccurate, as Mr Moulton must surely be aware: see our report dated 26th December 2007 on the fraudulent finance model underlying the so-called ‘sub-prime’ crisis. On 3rd March 2008, The Daily Telegraph used the phrase ‘fraudulent behaviour by mortgage lenders’ [page B4]. The media is cottoning on, nine months LATE.

15. On 26th February, Dr Joseph Stiglitz, the former Chief Economist at the World Bank, a ‘serious man’ if ever there was one, warned in his newly published book, The Trillion Dollar War, written with Harvard lecturer Linda Bilmes, that the financial and human cost of Bush II’s odious war (the purpose of which was to seize control of the Central Bank of Iraq: see Note (2)) is likely to be not three trillion dollars (that’s the overall cost, all things considered, to the United States), but double that total, given that the cost to the Rest of the World will be about the same. Dr Stiglitz said that the new occupant of the White House will inherit a country that is ‘living on borrowed time and borrowed money’ – yet he FAILED to point out that this could have been avoided if The Wanta Plan had been implemented with the taxed, on-the-books trading programmes starting up in June/July 2006 as should have happened under the Wanta Plan prior to Paulson’s hijacking operation.

• Dr Stiglitz added that there was evidence that the US Government had been trying to cover up the cost of the war: ‘We had to use the Freedom of Information Act to uncover things that we never would have known’. Pointing to the high numbers of injured servicemen, he noted that ‘the official website figure was less than half the total’. In 16 years’ time, the United States would be facing a $4.0 billion annual bill for injured servicemen. He estimated that 40% of the US military currently fighting in Iraq will return home severely disabled.

• It is therefore no surprise that President George W. Bush’s eyes have turned jet black. He has not only murdered an estimated 1.5 million people in Iraq, but has wrecked the lives of a huge number of US servicemen. Please see the Editor’s comments about demonic possession in the report dated 25th February 2008.

16. At 3.42pm on 26th February, the Editor received a phone call from a contact in which it was stated that the necessary impetus had been placed once again behind the Settlements, and that key Trustees had yet again been placed on standby to go into the relevant banks to take care of their ‘macro’ payments. This unverified information, of course, presupposed that the $300 trillion will have been retrieved in the interim.

17. At 3.55 pm on 26th February, the Editor was informed that (a) certain people were very pleased with the Editor’s posting dated 25th February, and (b) that it had made a number of parties finally aware that the United States is run by a psychopath. (Note: This assessment was conveyed to us for several days thereafter).

• At the same time, extreme annoyance at the articles within the criminalised echelons of US intelligence triggered yet another cyber-attack on the communications of Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. and Ambassador Leo Wanta. (The ‘Bush on the Couch’ report was first published in International Currency Review, known as ‘the green book’, in January 2005, so it was already three years old).

• As an interesting sideline, the first component of the 26th February report, dealing with the Ronald Reagan Library Wanta papers, contained our information about the CIA front organization which called itself Multi-Sector Crisis Management, run by a Mr and Mrs Neil Thompson. We have learned that exposure of this operation by this service resulted in its abrupt closure.

Notwithstanding that the operatives in that nest tried to scam the Ambassador and Mr Cottrell (see the preceding report), Mr Neil Thompson had the extreme audacity and shamelessness to get in touch with Ambassador Wanta recently, in search of future opportunities.

Another response to our posting that segment of the report (despite the fact that we had published the text as an occasional paper, distributed with International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 and 2 on 14th September 2007) was: ‘Oh, we’d forgotten about that’.

According to sources, the operatives running that now defunct US intelligence front had allegedly tried to gain access to $3 billion owned by Mr Cottrell and held for his account abroad but which he has been unable to access.

18. Repeated inaccurate, but ruthlessly disseminated, reports were noted during this period, and earlier in February, that Ambassador Wanta had taken economic receipt of his ‘compromise’ $4.5 trillion, thereby releasing his claim, as sole Principal, of the $27.5 trillion base funds that he owns and which were stolen from him (as he has proved to be unable, given his banking orientation, to prevent his criminalist colleagues from stealing his funds).

• These inaccurate reports were fed into the ‘system’ by CIA disinformation hacks, followed the standard ‘ying-yang’, ‘backy-forthy’, ‘Urim-Thummim’ (Yes and No) dialectical methodology which is the essence of the Bush-Greenspan ‘Never-Pay’ ‘perpetual deception’ model. It was also thought that these ruthless deception specialists could be engaged in a ‘sib’ operation to maximise their potential for ensuring the permanent capture and retention of all the stolen funds.

19. On Wednesday 27th February 2008, at 10.40pm, the Editor was informed by telephone at 10:40 am that the Group of Nine powerful financial countries had been meeting for the past two days.

• Condoleeza Rice, the US Secretary of State, had demanded to participate in the meeting, but was informed that her demands and her words could not be trusted and had no meaning, and that her presence was neither required and nor would it be appreciated. Ms Rice is a candidate for arrest, along with all members of the Bush II Cabinet. The Group of Nine, along with the Rest of the World (the 160 payee countries), now regard the United States as a pariah state.

• It was separately reported to us by several sources that certain wire transfers had been delayed or held up from Wednesday 27th February onwards.

20. It was also simultaneously reported to the Editor of this service on 27th February that President George Bush had delivered a cynical little speech to ‘his friends’, in which he had bragged that he hoped ‘everyone was now enjoying spending their money’. This information could only have been leaked, since the Editor unfortunately lacks a fly on the Oval Office wall.

21. On both Wednesday and Thursday 27th-28th February, Dr Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, testified before Congress. In response to a question about the Basel II reformed banking system, Bernanke answered the question correctly, describing what it would procure. However, significantly, he was NOT asked the pertinent questions about Basel II, which are these: Has the Basel II banking system, which has been in force in Germany since 1st January 2007, been introduced in the United States yet? If not, when will it be introduced? Why was it not introduced as scheduled, with effect from the turn of this year? Why has the Wanta settlement been repeatedly hijacked? Is it the intention to make the Wanta payment? Is it the intention to make the other Settlement payments? Is it the intention to steal all the funds (see below)? One might add, given the notorious corruption in the US Congress, that this further question might have been asked (in the closed session; see immediately below): How much will you pay each of us not to reveal that you are continuing to steal and misappropriate the Wanta and other Settlement funds?

• For those who are unaware of this, open US Congressional testimony sessions on sensitive subjects are preceded by secret classified meetings, at which it is decided, in advance, which questions the witnesses will be asked. These meetings take place in the Capitol itself, and are highly secret, access being code clearance only. All documents taken into the sessions must be left there and may not be removed when it ends. The Editor testified twice before Congressional Committees in the 1980s, and of course, since he did not hold a sensitive post, this did not occur on those occasions: but when someone like the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board is the witness, this is the procedure. Therefore, what emerges from the open testimony question and answer sessions, is rigged, and doctored for public consumption. That explains why Dr Bernanke was not asked the appropriate questions on this occasion.

• The 408-page Federal Reserve Board document entitled ‘Basel II Final Rules: Federal Reserve Board Open Board meeting: November 2, 2007: 10.00 a.m. EDT’ sent to the Editor of International Currency Review by the Federal Reserve Board, compiled by and on behalf of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the US Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Treasury’s Office of Thrift Supervision, contains the following rubric:
Dates: This final rule is effective [INSERT DATE].

22. In the course of Wednesday 27th February, it became clear that the recalcitrant US criminalist forces had no intention of meeting the Fund’s deadline of Thursday 28th February 2008 for the Settlements. It was also reported that a very large real estate developer in Nevada, involved in major development projects, had defaulted on a $500 million interest payment. Anecdotal reports were being received of Americans handing in the keys of their properties to banks, the keys of their cars to dealerships and returning defaulted credit cards to the providers.

• Background reports of the Group of Nine debating the necessity of finally giving the go-ahead for the on-again, off-again sanctions against the United States, were received all day.

23. On Thursday 28th February (an ‘up’ day according to the ying-yang dialectical disinformation model), the Editor received a phone call from a source at 1.20pm to the effect that ‘Leo Wanta had been placed on notice last night that he was to be paid’.

This ‘report’ was accompanied by statements to the effect that US Treasury officials ‘went to the (relevant) bank early this morning’, a certain trustee had to go to his bank in Connecticut at 2.00 am, another Trustee who banks offshore was called to his bank, while a key lawyer in France who had left Paris for his countryside residence for the evening, had suddenly been recalled from his home and brought back to Paris by his chauffeur. These reports, at least so far as Ambassador Lee Wanta was concerned, proved to represent disinformation. Today was an ‘up’ day. Wednesday had been a ‘down’ day’. Tuesday had been an ‘up’ day’. Money had been a ‘down’ day.

24. It was reported, and later confirmed, on 28th February, that President Bush had informed the relevant banks that they need not comply with the demands of the International Monetary Fund.

• So they didn’t.

• STOP: This reflects the reality that the criminal US Presidency and the criminal enterprise banks are defying, now, THE ENTIRE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY, as represented by the Fund.

25. At 13:54 pm UK time on 28th February, a contact with the US military reported to us that ‘no payment will be made today’. (This assertion was emphatically repeated on the following day).

26. It is confirmed (from sources separate to the single published source) that Bush Sr. (41) sent a legal team to the World Court on Wednesday 28th February to demand immunity for his and for his associates’ endless crimes, and that, simultaneously, President George W. Bush Jr. sent his own legal team to the Supreme Court to beg likewise for immunity, on his behalf and on behalf of his entire Cabinet – and that in both instances, immunity was refused. The precise circumstances of this development are recounted in the Main Intelligence Section below.

• It is also true that the entire Bush II Cabinet has been informed, through legal channels, that immunity from the consequences of their financial and related crimes, their co-conspiracy, and the fact that they are individually and collectively accessories to the fact of endless crimes (notably the financial crimes delineated in earlier Wantagate reports) has been flatly refused.

• It is understood that the World Court and the Supreme Court listened patiently to the respective Presidents’ pleadings, and were not impressed. The real background to these Bush applications for immunity is given in the Main Intelligence, reported below.

27. At 19:41 UK time on Friday 28th the Editor sent the following email to Ambassador Lee Wanta, Michael C. Cottrell , M.S. and Thomas Henry, Wanta’s lawyer. It is addressed to Mr Henry:

Thomas E Henry
1125 South 79th Street
Nebraska 58124 USA

28th February 2008

Wisconsin Case # 92CF683

Could you let me know, as soon as possible, please, what steps, if any, have been taken since July 2005 to procure the necessary justice and substantial financial compensation that is clearly due to the Ambassador in respect of the illegal incarceration, probation and taxation of Ambassador Wanta predicated upon the basis of the fabricated and duplicated Delinquent Tax Warrant #44-00162088 which was the subject of a notarised Outagamie Court ‘Satisfaction of Delinquent Tax Warrant’ dated 1st June 1993, and notwithstanding that the relevant illegally charged amount of $14,129 had been paid by the Ambassador twice in 1992? As you know I am an interested party in this matter, since my loan of $35,000 which paid the same amount for the third time, fell due for repayment on 10th June 2007 but was not repaid as it should have been, and my private funds were disbursed as follows: $24,900.91 was credited by the Wisconsin Department of Revenue to account 5QJLF7V5 which is nothing to do with the Ambassador, while $4,167.64 of my private funds were paid by the State Department of Corrections to the Wisconsin Defender’s Office contrary to Federal Law as the Ambassador asked for his own Defender and was refused.

If nothing has been done, could please respond accordingly, so that I can incorporate this fact into my next report. I also need this information for a possible application to the US Supreme Court so that I can recover my funds, which appear to have been misallocated/stolen by the Wisconsin Department of Revenue.

I would be most grafeful for your prompt response to this enquiry within seven days, so that I can have the necessary information to hand pending my forthcoming visit to New York.

For your information, I wrote last October under the Misprision of Felony Statute to Judge Martin in Wisconsin, who had written to me last July explaining why he would be doing nothing to rectify matters. Christopher Story FRSA. cstory@worldreports.org.

28. Open media reports confirmed that massive margin calls had occurred on Friday 29th February [see Main Intelligence Section, for explanation below]. An FDIC official was reported to have made negative public comments about 76 US banks [see above].

29. Over the weekend of 1st-2nd March, it became clear, from numerous pointers, that the criminal US intelligence establishment have decided that Barack Obama is to be the next President of the United States. He will be clueless, permissive and extremely weak. His campaign is reported to have hired 12,000 square feet in downtown Chicago, through a mob-related entity, Rezco, at the knockdown price of $12.0 per square foot. The mob connection again, of course.

• The ‘switch’ to Obama has coincided with an outbreak of overtly anti-Jewish reports all over the place, implying that an ‘Operation Revenge’ (which the Editor knows exists) against the excessive power of the Jews in the United States is about to be unleashed. If this assessment is accurate, it would reflect the extremes to which prominent Jews have gone as Wantagate has developed, to steal as much money for themselves as possible – starting with Mr Paulson’s illegal retention of control over the $4.5 trillion Settlement funds agreed with Ambassador Wanta, at Goldman Sachs.

• The ‘third catastrophe’ written into the blueprint for global chaos and control by the demonically possessed 19th century sorcerer and necromancer, Albert Pike, calls for the Illuminati to foment lethal enmity between the Jews and Islam which will escalate to engulf the whole world, leaving the manipulators – who presume that they are authorised to direct mankind’s total affairs in what they regard as a purely mechanistic world, supposedly in charge, and then able to create ‘order out of chaos’. However all they can achieve is chaos out of order, as Lucifer, their god – the god of lies and confusion, and the Prince of this World – turns everything upside down and back to front.

• By extension, the ‘neat arrangements’ that Ambassador Wanta is being blackmailed and coerced into accepting, will NOT deliver the outcomes that he expects. It will turn his world upside down again and leave him stranded, all his money stolen, and in a worse condition than ever before, because once they have stolen his funds for good, they will do a ‘Foster’ or a ‘Howie Kwong Kok’ on him. That is what they always do, and if he thinks otherwise, he will once again become a tragic victim of his own kind nature. That is the Editor’s carefully considered assessment.

• The criminal intelligence nexus that is strangling the United States has its base in Chicago, the HQ of the mob. The other key centers of this open-ended criminality are Fort Meade, the controlled political structures in Washington, and elements of the US intelligence community.

• The contaminated power model operates as follows. The Intelligence Power, with its capacity for penetration, interpenetrates the Chicago-headquartered organised criminal community, and vice versa. This means that, as repeatedly stressed in these reports, the US intelligence community, like its Soviet counterpart, is a criminal enterprise. (There is really no such thing as a ‘White hat’. There are ‘Black hats’ and ‘Grey Hats’).

• The Intelligence Power penetrates the two other sides of the power triangle, namely the Military Power and ‘the Party’ (with its two falsely competing, controlled dialectical opposites. To make controlled democracy appear to ‘work’, these fake dialectical opposites do adhere to different philosophies, concocted in such a way as to bamboozle the hoi polloi, the Goyim, the ‘masses’, and/or the ‘sheeple’). It is its ‘power to penetrate’ that keeps the Intelligence Power on top.

Because the Intelligence Power penetrates ‘the Party’, it gets to select the holders of the highest offices. Its partial (but incomplete) penetration of the Military Power has assured – UNTIL NOW – that it retains control – which is why the CIA criminal enterprises have succeeded in amassing colossal fortunes off-balance sheet, offshore, and without a penny having been paid in tax.

And the corrupt Treasury, with its corrupt Internal Revenue Service, has allowed all this to occur, thereby operating in absolute dereliction of its duty to manage the United States’ finances at the optimum level of rectitude. Senior officials at that Department have behaved disgracefully.

We have long since pointed out, for instance, that if the Wanta Settlement had not been hijacked by ‘the late’ Henry M. Paulson (see below), the Treasury would have received its windfall $1.575 trillion in June/July 2006, followed by no less than $200 billion (estimated) accruals per banking day from the Wanta Plan’s projected on-balance sheet investment operations involving AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., Mr Cottrell’s Pennsylvania Investments, Inc, and six or eight banks operating properly on-balance sheet, with all accruals taxed.

Paulson, Cheney and the Bush and Clinton Crime Families thwarted this agreed-upon Wanta Plan, and for this reason are jointly and severally chargeable with treason – as indeed is EVERYONE WHO IS NOW STANDING IN THE WAY OF THE SETTLEMENTS AS ORIGINALLY PLANNED, including close advisers to Ambassador Wanta.

This, therefore, is the point at which we think it is appropriate to read EVERYONE CONCERNED, yet again, the RIOT ACT. You know about this criminality? It’s your legal duty to report it:


‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

30. At 3:16 a.m. on Saturday 1st March, the Editor of this service sent the following email to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. This email induced a flurry of activity at the weekend, given that it exposed that the criminal cadres have indeed set up a new conduit for the specific intent of stealing and exploiting ALL THE MONEY, INCLUDING THAT PAYABLE TO THE IMF/PROSPERITY PROGRAMME PAYEES AND ALL THE OTHER TIERS INVOLVED (see the Main Intelligence Section below):

Please provide me with a written confirmation or denial of the following statement which has been made to us by a financial market source:

‘The Federal Reserve set up a dummy corporation to steal the IMF/Prosperity programme money a week ago during a fund movement’.

This allegation was received in the early morning UK time 1st March 2008.

As you may appreciate, should we receive no response from you, that may be taken as an indication that the allegation may be accurate, and may be published on our website accordingly, in this context. We will publish your reply.

Your urgent attention is appreciated. For the sake of good order, please be advised that the next ‘Wantagate’ report is in preparation and must include a reference to this matter.

Christopher Story FRSA
Editor and Publisher
International Currency Review
108 Horseferry Road
London SW1P 2EF
United Kingdom
Email: cstory@worldreports.org
Website: www.worldreports.org

• Note: At the time of this posting, NO REPLY HAD BEEN RECEIVED.

31. At 2.30 pm UK time on Sunday 2nd March, the Editor learned that 12 officials and bankers had been arrested in France on Saturday 1st March. Those concerned were reported to have been standing in the way of the Settlements. Sources then reiterated to the Editor that the attempts in the preceding week by Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. to obtain immunity [see Main Intelligence Section, below] had indeed failed: and the specific reason for this was that Bush Jr. had been caught in flagrante accepting a PERSONAL PAYMENT while visiting Africa (as explained below).

•The point here is that President Bush was actually caught taking a personal bribe of substantial proportions, and his father was involved as well: this left the authorities with NO OPTION but to proceed to have these crooks arrested. However the arrests were averted (temporarily) when the illegal personal payment was reversed (causing the stock market sell-off and margin calls that occurred on 29th February: again, see below). That the arrests did not proceed is ludicrous: if I steal from you, you find out and I restore what I have stolen, I am still guilty of the original theft.

32. The Editor was informed on Sunday 2nd March at 2.40pm UK time that the World Court, having well understood that the problems are caused by a small clique of ‘world class criminals’ holding current and former high office, has agreed with the Group of Nine countries that these powers are not going to allow a World War, which is being contemplated, to break out (as has been discussed intensively in some capitals) because of the criminal operations of the Bush-Clinton Crime Wave.

33. It was further revealed to us on Sunday that the World Court had informed the International Monetary Fund and the US military that they have until Monday (unclear whether this INCLUDED the whole of Monday 3rd March) to implement the Wanta and the other Settlements.

• Failing that, the World Court will take direct responsibility for procuring the Settlements, and all who are standing in the way, including those at the highest levels in the United States, the entire US Cabinet and George Bush Sr., will be arrested. Our source could not elaborate as to how this outcome would be achieved, but the message for the time being is that the powers to settle will be taken out of the hands of the IMF and the US military, and assumed by the World Court, on behalf of the Group of Nine financial powers.

• The US response appears to have been to escalate tensions in the Middle East, which we always suspected they would do as soon as their position had reached this stage of exposure.

34. As a corollary to all this, we were told that the G-9 sanctions, which had been semi-suspended (although certain incidents involving sanctions have been recorded) would be reimposed in force, with no further prevarication. Since the G-9 have backed off from implementing the full sanctions against the United States each time that the ‘ying-yang’ dialectical on-again, off-again ‘Never Pay’ charade has been perpetrated, one cannot be sure at this juncture that the G-9 will proceed. But it does appear, especially in the light of the near arrest on personal corruption charges of Bush Jr. and his evil father, that there will indeed be no turning back. Except that they may again back off because of the deliberately contrived escalation of tension in the Middle East ( = OBFUSCATION).

• It is this ‘evolution of events’ that makes Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta’s reported vacillation and vulnerability to the blackmail blandishments of his untrustworthy intel colleagues, of such world-shattering importance; and that makes what he decides to do now – whether to dump Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. as his corporate Treasurer and double-cross Christopher Story – so unprecedentedly critical both for him and for the future of mankind.

35. At 5.20 pm on Sunday 2nd March 2008, the Editor was informed as follows concerning Paulson:

• It is KNOWN in the relevant circles in Germany and France that the ‘Paulson’ purporting to represent himself as Paulson is NOT Henry M. Paulson, who they know was shot on 28th/29th December 2007 as we reported. Images of ‘Paulson’ standing at a podium with his hands open, as usual, showing the crooked little finger on the left hand, are library photos, and are attributed to Associated Press, an Agency-controlled mouthpiece.

• Knowledge of this reality is held inside European government structures and by individuals ‘in positions to know’, according to our sources.

• It is assumed by these sources that the countries and individuals have evidence as to who ordered Paulson’s assassination, since we know that efforts are being made to have that official indicted for murder. This is, as they say, a ‘breaking story’.

With respect to a few people who have written angrily and thoughtlessly to the Editor of this service in this subject, we have two things to say. First, our report dated 9th January summarises all that we have been in any position to assert, until now. Secondly, the key source of any apparent disinformation which may or may not feature in this matter, is of course the filthy, corrosive, Agency-controlled network of paid liars and dialectical diversion specialists whose job it is to OBFUSCATE and to maximise the potential for confusion, as cover for the endless criminal acts that are being perpetrated 24/7 behind the scenes by the criminal cadres in charge. Their job is not to tell the truth, but rather to promulgate and sustain confusion AS A DELIBERATE ACT OF STATE POLICY.

This means, inevitably, that extracting the truth from this endless barrage of lies is an arduous task, which is why this service maintains its own network of sources that are unconnected with the US disinformation apparat. One cannot always be sure that one has not been deceived: we believe that we have sifted most of the lies out, but we may have erred occasionally: what can one expect when, as in Nazi Germany, the ENTIRE U.S. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT IS NOW BASED UPON THE ARBITRARY MIXING OF FACT AND DIVERSIONARY FICTION, a.k.a. deception?

• However, we rely as previously upon our report dated 9th January, plus the additional ‘Paulson’ information added here. There is a separate library of forensic evidence in support of the fact that Paulson was shot (which we know to be true, given that it was reported by official sources, to the Principals, as we stated at the time), while the death was corroborated by the State Department, a veteran Federal Reserve Governor and an Ambassador, whose identities we were requested to conceal but which are known to the Editor of this service.

• We expect ‘further shoes to drop’ on this subject, but would caution that it is pointless to argue about this matter until they do. Please bear ALL the above in mind.


Following the Editor’s email to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve in the early morning of the 1st March 2008, referenced above, the significance of our pointed mention of the US Federal Reserve’s ‘dummy corporation’ set up to steal ALL THE FUNDS, suddenly unravelled – as did the significance of President George W. Bush’s peculiar visit to Africa (which HM The Queen had at the forefront of her mind when she asked the Group of Eight financial powers last June to procure The Wanta Plan settlement ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’). Specifically:

It was reported to us by the most reliable sources that President George W. Bush took a $1.0 billion-plus PERSONAL payment while visiting Africa, as part of a scheme to establish an ‘African Central Bank’. The new, corrupt ‘African Central Bank’ is to act as the counterparty for the unlawful trading of all the funds belonging to payees which the criminal cadres are intent upon stealing even as the IMF, the US military, the Group of Nine and the World Bank actually procure the Settlements.

As you know the holder of office under the United States is precluded from accepting personal bribes and under-the-table payments, and enriching himself by virtue of the office that he holds. The payment was, known, traced, and demonstrated to be blatantly illegal; and when confronted by the relevant authorities, both former President H. W. Bush and President G W. Bush panicked and rushed their legal teams to the World Court and the US Supreme Court, respectively – specifically in order to secure immunity from the consequences of the illegal activities related to that personal payment, known to have been at least $1.0 billion, but believed to have been higher – although sources elaborate that both Bushes, cornered by Wantagate, took the opportunity to seek immunity from arrest and indictment for all their other financial fraud operations and other crimes, too.

Neither Court granted them immunity, as correctly reported by another source.

It is certainly curious that their joint come-uppance was related to such a ‘small’ illegal personal payment – given the magnitude of the other financial crimes, in which, as we have reported, they have been involved: but you will recall that it is very often the case that criminals are ‘taken down’ on ‘lesser’ offences which are watertight in court, whereas much larger crimes may be harder to prove. (Notorious mobsters, for example, have historically been jailed for tax offences, despite the fact that their involvement in massive scams, murders etc is known).

Bush’s illegal personal payment was structured via a bank account established for a new shell corporation established by US in telligence cadres within the World Bank and funnelled through the Federal Reserve Inter Bank Settlement Fund to the newly qualified ‘African Central Bank’.

Hence President Bush Jr.s visit to Africa, his cockiness throughout, and his curious recent press conference at which he blathered about AIDS and other projects for Africa – which, in reality, are the ‘public face’ of the intended corrupt financing conduit that intelligence cadres and the corrupt World Bank (yes, it’s still as corrupt as ever, under Zoellick) have established, probably to replace the similar ‘mortgage crisis’ off-off-balance sheet financing ‘Black Hole’ projects in Washington, DC that the ‘late’ Mr Paulson tried to establish for ongoing illegal, off-balance sheet, untaxed trading purposes before the unfortunate events at the end of last year.

The new ‘African Central Bank’ counterparty arrangements were no doubt not unconnected with the fact that the key ‘Black Hole’ properties of the Central Bank of Iraq had been exposed by this service. As a direct consequence of that exposure, in late January 2008, four (perhaps, depending on the source used, six) floors of the Central Bank of Iraq on Al-Rasheed Street, Central Baghdad, were burned out as the corruption crisis caught fire at the ‘Black Hole’ so carefully annexed by the Bush Crime Family and their corrupt associates. The Central Bank of Iraq, which has appeared to be ‘independent’, was in fact controlled, of course, directly by the White House – for unlawful, off-balance sheet, untaxed high-yield programme trading purposes.

The whole point of the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 was precisely to seize the Central Bank of Iraq, to steal its currency and gold, to remove the Saddam Hussein-era General Management and replace them with compliant operatives, to issue instructions from the Central Bank to Saddam Hussein’s ‘private’ bank, Rafidain Bank, reputed to have accumulated some $100 trillion of fiat assets at its London Branch, and then to exploit the Central Bank of Iraq, controlled directly from the White House, as the counterparty for ongoing illegal, off-balance sheet, untaxed financial fraud operations, i.e. corrupt ‘business as usual’.

• It is possible that the stealing of HM The Queen’s gold, exclusively reported by this service last year, was related to the refusal of the British authorities to allow the avaricious Americans to seize control of the $100+ trillion of ‘assets’ at the London branch of Rafidain Bank.

However it must be emphasised that this suggestion currently represents merely an ‘inspired assessment’ on the part of this Editor.

Anyway, when the backwash from Wantagate caught up with the perpetrators, and after we had exposed the White House’s control of the Central Bank of Iraq and its purpose, it was time to burn the evidence. Reports of the fire at the Central Bank coincided with separate reports that some $800 billion had ‘gone missing’ from the Central Bank of Iraq. We are advised that these ‘assets’ may have been shifted temporarily to Switzerland, and that it was necessary to cover the tracks in Baghdad: hence the fire which consumed at least four floors of the building.

The new shell account within the World Bank funnelled through the closed Federal Reserve Inter Bank Settlement Fund appears to be the dummy corporation set up by the Federal Reserve to steal the IMF/Prosperity Programme money’ referenced in the Editor’s email to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System sent at 3: 16 a.m. on 1st March, referenced above.

When the personal corrupt payment was exposed as illegal and was on the verge of being used as the pretext for the immediate arrest of George Bush Senior and his schizophrenic psychopath of a son, the payment had to be reversed.

Since this was a cash-cash situation – and there is hardly ANY CASH liquidity at all in the system – Municipal Bond Portfolios were sold off at discounted prices to create and generate the necessary funds – since other collateral is treated these days as having no real value.


Against this background, the relevant cadres of the US intelligence community have, as indicated, stepped up their psychological pressure on Ambassador Wanta to ‘dump’ Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., who provides Wanta’s ONLY lifeline, as the Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. – given the highly principled stance that Mr Cottrell has taken against all forms of financial criminality, and in the light of the pressure that Mr Cottrell has been able to exert, combined with the huge global impact of these Wantagate reports prepared by this Editor.

• The skewed ‘thinking’ behind this nonsense is that the exposure of the illegal activities of the Bushes, Cheney, the Clintons, the ‘late’ Mr Paulson, and others, is getting in the way of other ongoing and intended corrupt operations. To which the obvious answer is: you should have thought of that BEFORE you stole the Ambassador’s $4.5 trillion, not 22 months afterwards.

It is indicative of the extremely low calibre of US intelligence that the huge benefits that would have accrued to the United States if The Wanta Plan had been implemented in June/July 2006, rather than being hijacked by them (for this Paulson, of course, was an operative), have been squandered by these criminals; and that the intention, following this DISASTER, is to perpetuate this illegality by inveigling the Ambassador into a slot where he can be scammed, hung, drawn and quartered, and certainly polished off finally, after all his money has been stolen.

• THE FACT that the relevant US intelligence cadres have resisted The Wanta Plan and Basel II throughout, confirms that the CIA and its appendages are indeed a huge CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE.

• Put another way, the people involved with all this devious scheming around Ambassador Wanta, having made a revolting dogs’ dinner of the situation and brought the whole world to the brink of catastrophe due to their ingrained criminality, prefer to continue this aberrant behaviour and to drag the whole world into an economic morass with no historical precedent, as we first predicted our report dated 2nd September 2006. That is because they thrive in an environment of open-ended criminal chaos – which is to say, that they prefer the Law of the Jungle to the Rule of Law.

They could have refinanced the United States and the whole world by now, heaving restored America to her rightful place as leader of the nations: instead of which they have done the only things that they know how to do: ‘bait and switch’, off-balance sheet self-enrichment operations, scamming, stealing and endless lying, deception and murder.

Of course these madmen are all destined ultimately to be cast into outer darkness. Because they know this, these people want to drag the rest of us there too – so that they won’t be lonely.

The Editor understood long ago why certain of his US contacts kept invoking ‘national security’, when what they were actually covering up was their own involvement in criminal operations, or those of family members. All concerned, including the Ambassador, should be reminded yet again of the Misprision of Felony Statute, which the Ambassador has in the past been very keen that the Editor rams down the throats of every American who reads these reports.

In fact, if the Ambassador is about to collaborate with these criminals, he will himself be in breach of the Misprision of Felony Statute which he has been so keen that the Editor should promulgate. No-one is above the law, not even the greatest US patriot of our age. Sorry: that’s the truth.

To cut a long story slightly shorter, Ambassador Wanta was directed or coerced – at the specific insistence of one more more special advisers to President George W. Bush, that the Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. Morgan Stanley International Securities Account, operative under the Private Joint Venture Agreement between Mr Cottrell’s Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. and AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. dated 30th December 2005 – should not take early receipt of an agreed-upon $500 billion of funds that are necessary to undertake an International Financial Instrument Contract – until ‘official’ approval has been obtained. The reason given for this was that Mr Cottrell may now be considered to be ‘too powerful’ and ‘the Ambassador’s role was not observed to be equal’.

This perverse perception reflects the facts that Michael Cottrell is a known and globally respected securities industry expert of the highest intellectual calibre, that operating in the securities sector is essential to ensure the long-term protection of the funds (since the safeguards in the securities sector are much tighter than in the decadent US banking sector).

The idea that this state of affairs places Mr Wanta at a disadvantage vis-à-vis Mr Cottrell (i.e., that Mr Cottrell is about to ransack his funds) is childish poppycock: at no time could Mr Cottrell be deemed as likely to take financial measures contrary to Ambassador Wanta’s wishes. However the Ambassador has to come to terns with the fact that Mr Cottrell knows what he is talking about, that the securities sector is the only environment within which these operations can function without running the risk of the usual suspects stealing the funds, and that there is no safe alternative to the existing arrangements.

• Here, the Editor wishes to point out that these reflections are entirely his own arms’-length conclusions. Far from Mr Cottrell being likely to steal the Ambassador’s funds, the reality is that any US operatives now “parachuted in’ to replace Michael Cottrell will have been imposed PRECISELY IN ORDER TO RIFLE THE FUNDS AND TO LEAVE AMBASSADOR WANTA DESTITUTE AGAIN.

• The sole trustworthy Treasurer in town is Michael C. Cottrell, M.S.

It is true that Mr Cottrell speaks his mind when he has a point to make, and that sometimes the Editor of this service has himself been wounded by what he has had to say. But the fact has been that if Mr Cottrell had lied to the Editor, he would have found this out several years ago; and that everything that this top expert has had to say concerning matters of mutual concern has been succinct, accurate, to the point, and of the highest intellectual and ethical standards.

The Ambassador’s skills are known and admired worldwide – from HM The Queen to Peking – but they just do not happen to include expertise in the complex US securities environment. That is where Mr Cottrell excels: and as the Ambassador told the Editor when he introduced Mr Cottrell to him several years ago, ‘you can trust him’.

What has changed, then? Only one thing. The siren and unreliable blackmail blandishments of intelligence community colleagues who have brought the whole world to the brink of disaster thanks to their serial criminality, their myopia, their self-interest, and their culpable support for open-ended criminality – not least given that THEY, TOO are subject to the Misprision of Felony Statute. This is a point that these cadres conveniently overlook.

As for any ‘promises’ or undertakings that these people may have proffered to the Ambassador, they are sure to be worthless – like all the promises that he fell for in the past. The only people he can rely on are those he chose several years ago. He should continue with them and signify to these people that he is not changing his settled arrangements.

Otherwise there will indeed be a disaster – for him, for the United States, and for the whole world.

He should recognise, and concede, that he needs Mr Cottrell’s special expertise, and that trustworthy Treasurers in the United States hardly exist at all.

• Why throw away the ONLY trustworthy expert, and a world-class one at that, just because these ‘snake-oil salesmen’ operatives have ‘got to him’ and he wants to get back ‘into the game’?

It is a disaster, and terminal madness.

On 1st March, it became clear to us that the Ambassador was now required to ‘place his own people’ into the operation, and to appoint a new overall Treasurer for AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., since Mr Cottrell will be ‘too busy’ doing those functions mandated by the relevant authorities, and would not be able to do “day-to-day” operations.

• It was further pointed out, in so many words, to the Ambassador that since Mr Cottrell is not an intelligence officer, he is not ‘qualified’ to be the Treasurer of such funds.

This stance clearly contradicts the Private Joint Venture Agreement signed between Lee Emil Wanta (AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.) and Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. (Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.), as provided for in an AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. corporate resolution dated 16th December 2005, under the terms of which Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. was unanimously elected to serve as Executive Vice-President and Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., with Lee E. Wanta elected as President/Chief Executive Officer, and various joint ventures were authorised between Wanta’s corporation and Pennsylvania Investments, Inc [see above].

Furthermore, Leo E. Wanta (Lee E. Wanta) signed and dated, on 26th February 2006, a letter TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, identifying Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., the President of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., and giving him authorisation to ‘conclude the details and disposition of said settlement funds for deposit via Pennsylvania Investments In, Inc. Account(s) on behalf of Leo E. Wanta/Lee E. Wanta with the Social Security Number [redacted by the Editor for security reasons]’.

In summary, the US intelligence community have tried to manoeuvre into a position where they are engaged in blackmailing Ambassador Wanta into sacking Michael C. Cottrell. M.S., as the Executive Vice President and Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. – as a rather sordid quid pro quo (which of course cannot be relied upon) for the Settlement payment to Wanta.

• And all this is happening behind the backs of the International Monetary Fund, the US military, the World Court and the Group of Nine who are on the verge of subjecting the United States to an unprecedented sanctions offensive in order to procure the Settlement payments.

We need hardly elaborate that this state of affairs presents Ambassador Wanta with many grievous problems – the nature of which he may not have fully grasped.

To begin with, the time lapse between the murder in 1992 of Lee Wanta’s Chinese partner, Howie Kwong Kok, from ingesting rat poison, shortly after the visit to Singapore of George Bush Sr., and the unlawful arrest and later incarceration by a ‘kangaroo court’ of Leo Wanta, the loss of his funds and freedom, and his subsequent extended, unlawful probation, was just one year.

In short, if we consider the foregoing realities, we can present the following analysis of what the results of this intended malevolent ‘spook putsch’ will be for Ambassador Wanta and Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., personally:

1. IF the removal of Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., as Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., were to take place, it would represent a quid pro quo (blackmail) agreed to by Lee E. Wanta and the relevant authorities, for the Lee Wanta Settlement to be paid directly to Lee E. Wanta, in violation of the foregoing agreements between the two parties, as we understand the position.

2. The agreed upon US tax payment of $1.575 trillion on the repatriated funds of $4.5 trillion is evidently to be paid into an unknown Master Custodial Account via electronic transfer, with a signed acknowledgement of the tax payment by Lee E. Wanta.

•This SMELLS of the CERTAINTY that the intention here may be to DEFRAUD the U.S. taxpayer and the US Treasury of the benefits of the $1.575 trillion, a.k.a., TO STEAL THE TAX PAYMENT (as was evident when we exposed the secret, monitored meeting last year in Washington, DC at which US agencies were overheard dividing up the $1.575 trillion and by-passing the Treasury).

• Clearly, if Ambassador Wanta were, even unwittingly, to participate in such an arrangement, he may risk becoming immediately liable himself to having been set up as a party to a staged criminal conspiracy to deprive the US Treasury and the American people of the benefits of the $1.575 trillion initial ‘windfall’ tax, which should accrue to the exclusive benefit of the US taxpayer.

• On the face of what we know, therefore, Mr Wanta must surely exercise extreme caution here – and should turn down this proposal IMMEDIATELY. Payment of the tax to the US Treasury will need, we understand, to take place in the formal presence of Internal Revenue Service agents and Gold Badges, not least because the Ambassador will need maximum protection against any subsequent trumped-up allegation of tax evasion. These people are capable of ANYTHING – including turning the Ambassador’s own Misprision of Felony logic against him.

For there is nothing they would enjoy more than framing the Ambassador himself as an allegedly knowing co-conspirator in the theft of tax windfall funds from the US Treasury – a criminal act for which he could be indicted and jailed on conviction. At the very least, he could be made to appear to be an accessory to the fact of this crime. Our unsolicited advice, therefore, would be that any variation of the most straightforward and transparent arrangements for making the windfall tax payment, should be avoided like the plague.

3. It is understood that the ‘relevant authorities’ then ‘require’ Messrs Wanta and Cottrell to become involved in INTERNATIONAL financial agreements ONLY (NOT domestic transactions) via AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., with capital markets transactions (that should have been running since June/July last year) finally beginning.

We can then imagine, with the benefit of knowledge of past experience of how these people operate, the following scenario:

• Midstream of the Second or Third Tranche, it will suddnely be noted, that TAX PAYMENTS ON REPATRIATED FUNDS (given that ONLY international transactions are to be undertaken) HAVE NOT BEEN RECEIVED, and that there are sudden ‘irregularities’ in the financial arrangements made by AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., that directly implicate Messrs Wanta and Cottrell.

• Due to the apparent (but fraudulently contrived ‘by others’) activities now suddenly attributable to Messrs Wanta and Cottrell, an investigation is commenced by relevant Government authorities.

• Lee E. Wanta suffers a heart attack or a stroke (induced of course) or is involved in an accident, that precludes him from defending both himself and Mr Cottrell.

• Mr Wanta dies, and Mr Cottrell is convicted and jailed on trumped-up charges of fraudulent financial activities: AND THE MONEY DISAPPEARS.

Unfortunately, Mr Wanta appears to have agreed to fall into this trap and to have Mr Cottrell removed as Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc..

Therefore, some such horrific personal scenario is liable to ensue – with the United States’ greatest patriot of our time, Ambassador Wanta, and the United States’ most respected private securities industry expert, Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., thereby punished for opposing the Bush Crime Family, the Clinton Crime Family, the world’s most notorious financial criminal, Dr Alan Greenspan, and Bush’s long-term MK Ultra handler, Richard Cheney, et al.

The way out of this horrendous situation is for the Group of Nine and the World Court to insist NOW that THE EXISTING CORPORATE ARRANGEMENTS AND APPOINTMENTS MUST STAND, whatever new preference the Ambassador, in his delusions, may harbour.

Failing that, the world faces a hideous disaster, because these criminal-minded cadres will STEAL EVERY PENNY OF THESE FUNDS. That is what they intend to do.

They have already, after all, set up a secret means of channelling all the IMF/Prosperity programme funds into the closed Central Bank financing carousel – setting up a ‘new’ foreign Central Bank (to replace the exposed and burned Central Bank of Iraq, the Editor believes), for the purpose.

This makes it abundantly clear that the scheme that they have persuaded, or are persuading, Ambassador Wanta to adopt, is indeed a FALSE PROSPECTUS. The Ambassador must wake up to this reality immediately, before it is too late, and he personally ushers in the catastrophe.

We understand that Mr Cottrell will not agree to being set up. As for the Editor, the Ambassador should understand that he will not be around to bail him out of jail or probation a second time.

There is ONLY ONE Michael C. Cottrell, M.S.

And there is ONLY ONE Christopher Story. The Ambassador needs finally to understand that none of his supposed intelligence community ‘friends’ did what the Editor of this service did. They didn’t have the guts, they were afraid, they were cowards, and they just at and watched. They are full of hot air. Their words, like those of Ms. Rice, are meaningless, as well as being duplicitous.

The Editor cannot imagine that the kindly Ambassador would be a party to any scheme which resulted in the double-crossing of the Editor of this service, and thus a reversion to the standard nefarious US intelligence model – taking everything, giving nothing, while mouthing empty and duplicitous niceties in the process.

And one can also imagine what Her Majesty The Queen’s response to any such unthinkable betrayal of two of the Ambassador’s only reliable friends, is likely to be.

The Queen would feel, not without good reason, that she has been betrayed, as well.


(1). A ‘sib’ operation involves the perpetration of double-cross and scamming operations by the party least suspected of doing them. Thus, for instance, no ordinary person could imagine that the heirs of the Nazi Abwehr (counterintelligence), namely Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst, would be working hand-in-glove with a faction of Israeli intelligence at Dachau, the site of one of Hitler’s most notorious extermination camps for Jews, gypsies and others. But, that is a fact: it is the BIG SECRET, explaining why George H. W. Bush Sr., whose family is German Jewish by extraction, is or has been the head or US representative of the DVD, Dachau.

(2). Burning the evidence of this financial fraud, exposed by Wantagate, is becoming routine.

These fires recall the parallel fires at Iron Mountain warehouses that occurred, one after the other, in London and Ottawa on 12th and 13th July 2006, reported on page 14 of International Currency Review, Volume 31, Numbers 3 & 4. Specifically, as we reported at the time:

• A huge fire ripped through a six-storey Iron Mountain warehouse located at Twelvetrees Crescent, Bow, East London, on Wednesday 12th July 2006. About 100 firefighters attended the blaze, which was so severe that it was decided to let the blaze burn itself out. It was still smouldering three days later.

• Fire wrecked an Iron Mountain warehouse at Cyreville, Ottawa, Canada, on the next day.

London (UK) and Ottawa, Canada, are two centres through which a substantial proportion of questionable bank operations involving Ambassador Wanta’s stolen funds were transacted. Leo Wanta was framed and put out of contact and action in 1993 for an intended 22 years, and was pronounced dead within the US intelligence community and for the benefit of the co-conspiring banks. He re-emerged in 2005 and was then freed of all restrictions. During the 12+ years of his absence, certain institutions concluded, in tacit or explicit accord with various corrupt intelligence operatives, that the funds would never be claimed, and therefore proceeded to collateralise, cross-collateralise and otherwise ‘annexe’ the funds as though they were for the bank’s own account.

With the belated realisation throughout the international financial community that this illusion could no longer be sustained, following this Editor’s ‘wildcard’ action in paying for the Ambassador’s exit from probation in July 2005, panic may have gained the upper hand in certain quarters.

It appears that the growing panic may have prompted a decision deep within the recesses of the kleptocracy, to burn the records. For two Iron Mountain warehouses to burn down within 24 hours is manifestly no coincidence, given the background under consideration. The UK Iron Mountain warehouse stored a large number of files belonging to Deutsche Bank containing contracts for leveraged financial transactions. For fire to break out at such well-guarded end high-tech equipped warehouses, arson cannot fail to be the cause.

The fire that broke out at the Old Executive Office Building in Washington, DC, on 19th December 2007 was likewise deliberately set. It covered the extraction from that old building of documents believed to compromise the holders of highest offices in the United States. Although the Ottawa Sun newspaper described the Cyreville fire as ‘accidental’, the fact that it followed the London Iron Mountain warehouse fire by less than 24 hours suggested that this could not possibly have been the case. These fires have been hushed up.


• We now repeat, yet again, our familiar summary of the Statutes, securities regulations and fraud information that we have appended to these reports for many months. The reason we append this information is to remind everyone of their clear responsibilities under the US Misprision of Felony legislation, and of course to provide a legal basis for these reports.

Reiteration of the fraudulent transactions involving Bank of New York Mellon – a bank so arrogant and conspicuously indifferent both to its tarnished reputation and to its grotesque breaches of US law and of N.A.S.D./S.E.C. Regulations, that it now takes first prize in the crowded competition for the title of ‘Most arrogant and corrupt financial institution in America’. At least, this was the case until the perpetration of the ‘Saturday scam’ described above and on 13th November:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:


• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.


• ‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.


• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is in violation of:
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.


• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war

This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Wanta’s funds.

The Directors and others listed in Part 1 of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and others posted on 11th June may likewise be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious violation of the laws itemised above. This list is reproduced in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, September 2007, on pages 163-168.

The Ambassador and his colleagues now have special diplomatic status (conferred upon them by HM The Queen in 2007), which means that the Ambassador is now an Ambassador several times over. This factor greatly complicates the intended discrediting offensive that the mad US stupidity community’s Dark Forces contemplate, their sole objective being of course to cover up their own criminality, in line with pending ‘thought crime’ legislation which has the same Nazi-style objective.

• Note: ‘Kakocracy’: Governance by a clique representing the worst elements of society, in their interests and to the exclusion of all other interests, from the Greek, kakos, meaning foul, or filthy.

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier Wantagate reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s