QUEEN’S $52 BILLION STOLEN UNDER OBAMA’S REGIME

WHITE HOUSE ATTEMPTS TO GET US TO BLAME PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION

Monday 9 March 2009 16:00

QUEEN’S FUNDS WITHDRAWN ON 29TH JANUARY 2009 AFTER OBAMA CAME TO OFFICE

SO THE $52 BILLION OF HMQ’S MONEY (‘GUARANTEES’) WERE STOLEN UNDER OBAMA

A SCANDAL THEY HOPED COULD BE DEFLECTED AWAY FROM THE NEW WHITE HOUSE

WHY THE VIBES BETWEEN OBAMA AND BROWN DURING BROWN’S DC VISIT WERE SO BAD

• VERY IMPORTANT UPDATES APPENDED AT 3:00AM 10TH MARCH 2009
ARE LOCATED AT THE FOOT OF THIS REPORT ABOVE THE LEGAL REMINDERS

•INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW, Volume 34, #2: This issue is now well advanced in our print works and will be distributed worldwide soon. As indicated previously and below, it contains three flowcharts which show how the fake ‘derivatives’ sector represents a gigantic BANKERS’ RAMP, how the Paulson TARP operation was designed to reliquefy the likes of Carlyle, Carlyle Capital, George Bush Sr. and other familiar perpetrators, and why ALL derivatives ‘products’ are frauds – equipped, even, with their own esoteric language, the purpose of which is to prevent ordinary mortals from understanding how these interrelated Ponzi Scheme operations function.

But it is historically true that ALL Ponzi schemes implode sooner of later. What makes the present situation unprecedented in the history of fallen humanity is that (a) what is happening was indeed predicted here long before anyone had ever heard of Roubini, and (b) all the Ponzi operations are interlinked. Hence reports of EIGHT more Ponzi collapses pending in Europe, the panic that is now evident everywhere as it has been realised that hardly any institutions managed to avoid being caught up in the corruption, and the chaotic responses of terrified governments and officials who have not understood the central issue: THE DERIVATIVES ARE FAKE AND HENCE WORTHLESS.

International Currency Review may be ordered direct via this website. To order the forthcoming issue alone, please enter a regular order and ALSO send us an email via the CONTACT US tab to state that you specifically require International Currency Review Volume 34, #2 only. We have to charge a premium for individual issues, as we sell only serials in the normal course of business.
On this occasion, we are charging $300 for this issue, incorporating a 50% DONATION mark-up.

All such orders, as with all donations made to assist us with the financing of this research and our necessary exposures, are appreciated and acknowledged by the Editor.

• MADOFF ‘VICTIMS’ LIST: Two reports were posted on 6th February 2009 containing the entire list of customers of Bernard L. Madoff Securities, Inc.. Because the list is so huge, we divided it into two segments: Clients A-N; and clients O-Z, plus a Miscellaneous Section. See: Archive. Our list is the easiest to load and clearest of the lists that have been reproduced privately on the Internet.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice is comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the brave contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

• The CONTACT US facility is found in the red box throughout this combined website.

• NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

QUEEN’S FUNDS WITHDRAWN ON 29TH JANUARY 2009 AFTER OBAMA CAME TO OFFICE
It will be recalled that we have reported that the $14.0 trillion of real cash-cash funds, the only ‘real’ and clean money in the system, had to be withdrawn from access by US authorities altogether and that the withdrawal of these funds occurred on 29th January 2009.

This fact, which we had already reported, was confirmed to the Editor of this service on 3rd March 2009 by a British intelligence source.

The $14.0 trillion had consisted of the $6.2 trillion made available by Her Majesty the Queen, with a proportion owned by Prince Al-Aweed Al-Talal of Saudi Arabia, via the Bank of England on 19th-20th June 2007, to Bank of New York Mellon for use as the basis for the Group of Seven (G-7)-approved Refunding Programme of transparent, fully taxed private sector Capital Markets trading operations to reliquefy the delinquent banks ON THE BOOKS, and that the $6.2 trillion cash represented LOAN funds which had nothing whatsoever to do with any other funds referenced in earlier reports.

It will also be recalled that we have reported that the $6.2 trillion languished for 19 months within the Custodial Account system under Paulson US Treasury control within US money center banks, and was not used for the purpose for which it was intended, but was corruptly redeployed instead to generate illicit funds for the corrupt banker’s ramp carousel and for the enrichment of holders of the highest offices in the United States and their corrupt attorneys, intermediaries and others.

In our posting dated 5th March 2009, we reported that prior to the $14.0 trillion (incorporating the $6.2 trillion) being repatriated, an amount of $50 billion of The Queen’s funds had allegedly been stolen. We included the word ‘allegedly’, although we KNEW that $52 billion HAD been STOLEN.

Moreover as reported, the $6.2 trillion plus the Chinese segments aggregating $7.8 trillion were removed from any possibility of being accessed by US parties on 29th January 2009, namely just over a week AFTER President Barack Obama entered the White House.

MANIFESTLY, if there had been a problem of theft PRIOR TO OBAMA COMING TO OFFICE, the funds would have been removed from access by the corrupt US authorities BEFORE Mr Barack Hussein Obama entered the White House, wouldn’t they?

• The British authorities concerned wouldn’t have wanted to cause the incoming Obama Administration embarassment by removing the funds after the Inauguration.

• Diplomacy, and all that.

• INSTEAD OF WHICH the funds were removed from access AFTER the Inauguration.

SO THE $52 BILLION OF HMQ’S MONEY (‘GUARANTEES’) WERE STOLEN UNDER OBAMA
From which it is A CERTAINTY that the $52 billion that were STOLEN from The Queen’s LOAN funds were sliced AFTER OBAMA ENTERED THE WHITE HOUSE, AND NOT BEFORE.

• FACT: Therefore, the theft occurred under President Obama and NOT under his predecessor.

Which must be a FACT that the White House would prefer that we hadn’t UNDERSTOOD.

• Next point:

On Friday 6th March 2009, between approximately 8:19 EST and 8:20 EST, Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., the US securities expert, received a telephone call from a Gold Badge who advised him that
a ‘clarification’ was ‘necessary’ regarding ‘the $50 billion of The Queen’s money allegedly stolen prior to repatriation’ (citing the Editor’s language used in the report dated 5th March 2009).

The ‘clarification’ that he wanted made (should the Editor so agree to it, at his sole discretion) was that this text should be amended to read:

‘$52 billion of guarantees by The Queen’ and that no cash was stolen.

HOWEVER, a signed guarantee is a signed guarantee, and one issued by a Head of State is better than CASH, don’t you know. So, what we have now found out is as follows:

• US authorities UNDER OBAMA ADMIT that value of $52 billion belonging to The Queen was STOLEN, thereby acknowledging the accuracy of our report to this effect dated 5th March 2009.

• Stealing guarantees means that The Queen’s guarantees, if they were stolen rather than actual cash, were stolen BECAUSE THEY WERE TO BE USED FOR PURPOSES OTHER THAN THOSE THAT WERE INTENDED BY THE GUARANTOR. This is A GROSS ACT OF ECONOMIC WARFARE.

NO WONDER THAT THE VIBES BETWEEN OBAMA AND BROWN DURING HIS RECENT VISIT TO WASHINGTON WERE SO BAD. NO WONDER COMPLICIT VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN LOOKED LIKE A SOUR JACKASS AS HE SAT WITH A SIMILAR BLANK EXPRESSION TO CHENEY BEHIND THE BRITISH PRIME MINISTER AS HE DELIVERED HIS PRAISE FOR THE VERY CROOKS WHO HAVE STOLEN FROM THE QUEEN AND ARE CONTINUING TO RAPE AND PILLAGE THEIR FELLOW AMERICANS AND THE REST OF THE WORLD UNDER BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA ‘AS WE SPEAK’.

• If it is the case that guarantees rather than cash were stolen, then we suggest that the publicity we have given and are giving to this matter must, by definition, render the illegal and corrupt use of those guarantees for duplicitous, illicit purposes UNDER THE B. OBAMA REGIME impossible now, since every Government and every bank in the world will be appraised of this latest instance of official corruption at the highest level of the US Government, under President Obama as under his predecessors, just as soon as this report has been posted.

• BUT IF the guarantees have already been deployed, those parties thereto will have become co-conspirators in this de facto Act of US Economic Warfare against the United Kingdom committed under the Obama Administration and should immediately UNWIND THE TRANSACTIONS and/or the relationships involved, or face the consequences.

THE EDITOR MAKES HIS OWN ‘CLARIFICATION’
Finally, the Editor would like to make the following further ‘clarification’:

• Pressure has been exerted from the White House on the Editor of this service to post certain information (in our possession), the overall effect of which would be to serve the Obama White House’s interest in focusing the entire blame for specific thefts and fraud, and generally for the ongoing, unresolved financial chaos, on the corrupt predecessor Administration, and away from the present US Government and White House.

• The Editor was not born yesterday, although yesterday was in fact his birthday.

• If it was all the Bush II Administration’s fault, why then was the US Dollar Refunding not at once implemented as agreed by the G-7 Financial powers in 2007 and 2008, why have the Settlements been sabotaged SO FAR, as under the despicable George Bush regime, and why was $52 BILLION OF THE QUEEN’S MONEY STOLEN, and why this nit-picking differentiation between $52 billion cash and $52 billion of guarantees by a Head of State?

• Is it seriously suggested that stealing $52 billion of guarantees by a HEAD OF STATE is a LESSER CRIME than stealing $52 billion in cash?

But thanks anyway to the Gold Badge for confirming the theft, which took place UNDER OBAMA AND NOT BEFORE HE ENTERED THE WHITE HOUSE.

• Thought you’d all appreciate this ‘clarification’.

• UPDATES APPENDED AT 3:OOAM UK TIME 1OTH MARCH 2009:

(1) We have been advised that the matter of the $52 billion of The Queen’s ‘guarantees’ has now been ‘rectified’ by or on the instructions of President Obama. This BEGS THE QUESTION of why they were ‘removed’ in the first place: AND WE KNOW THAT THEY WERE MISSING WHEN THE LOAN FUNDS WERE WITHDRAWN, as this information was provided inter alia by a Gold Badge source, and it has now been separately confirmed that the $52 billion of ‘guarantees’ were indeed ‘restored’. (Clearly if they have been ‘restored’, that is because they were previously missing).

• So, WHEN were the $52 billion ‘restored’, exactly?

AFTER the appearance of the present report, which rendered the ‘guarantees’ USELESS when corruptly applied for a purpose for which they were not intended, by any chance?

(2) We have not published certain other detailed information supplied to us, for the reason set out above, namely that it focuses attention on certain criminal acts under the Bush II regime, whereas the crisis the world faces is being experienced UNDER PRESIDENT OBAMA and Vice President Joe Biden, who have the power to resolve matters but have conspicuously failed, so far, to do so.

We are not satisfied that the information that certain forces want us to publish has been proffered for straightforward reasons, and until such time as this is clarified to our satisfaction, the Editor exercises his prerogative not to publish the information [see above].

(3) Nor is this White House enforcing the Rule of Law.

• For instance, the Clintons are reported to have been able to REMOVE all their ill-gotten money from Citibank. Excu…se us? Those funds were FROZEN when the Provost Marshal was replaced by a new Provost Marshal way back, remember?

• So we suspect that Clinton’s gopher, Robert Rubin, has procured the removal of the Clinton funds from Citibank and that he did this before he himself left the institution.

• If this is correct, then the new White House has allowed a disgracefully corrupt state of affairs to remain unaddressed, and THAT IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH AND IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH PLEAS THAT WE HEAR TO THE EFFECT THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA IS A ‘WHITE HAT’.

• On the evidence to date, his hat is getting rather dirty, and the dirt comes off the hands of the scumbags in his entourage.

(4) We are advised that the oft-braceleted Dr Alan ‘Greenspan was flung into jail yesterday, and that a sensitive meeting took place on Monday to ‘decide his fate’. One is tempted to ask why on earth it is necessary to hold a meeting to decide whether this crook has now committed enough crimes to warrant APPLICATION OF THE RULE OF LAW: or could it be that he holds so much dirt on those who are trying to decide what to do with him, that they are prepared to go on fiddling while the whole international financial system collapses, stupid fools, around their ears?

(5) After propaganda all weekend to the effect that the Settlements were on track for progress and implementation on 9th March, NOTHING HAPPENED, even though Citibank had been advised that if the payments were not effected as required on 9th March, Citibank will be subjected to a straight FDIC takeover (which was supposed to happen overnight: we’ll see).

(7) The Editor has detailed information on the Stanford dimension of the crisis, plus the open domain intelligence on Vice President Biden’s involvement, and this report takes precedence, although there is still some work left to do on it (on top of the Editor’s other publishing work).

• FACT: Stanford, from Houston, TX, took over where Noriega left off, as a primary Ponzi scheme operative working with/for the Bushes. DVD drug-running operative Carlos Lehder ‘testified’ in Noriega’s trial (although his testimony was a rant and was superfluous to requirements), and was the source of the $40 million procured by a Bush Sr. Attorney to pay off key political structures in 2000 when the election was being stolen, and to silence the law enforcement, plus the legal and penitentiary personnel, when Lehder, in exchange, was whisked from long-term incarceration and extradited to GERMANY. Naturlich. Our sources reported that the political structures in question recieved $32 million and the corrupted personnel $8 million, on that happy and lucrative occasion.

• SWINDLER’S LIST UPDATE: Sherman Oaks-based mortgage banker Bruce Friedman, whose
Friedman Charitable Foundation committed $10 million to the Children’s Museum of Los Angeles and $1 million to Brandon’s Village, a special-needs park in Calabasas, has been indicted on
securities fraud charges by the Securities and Exchange Commission [9th March 2009].

The SEC alleges that Friedman, along with his two companies, Diversified Lending Group (DLG) and Applied Equities, Inc. (AEI), perpetrated a $216 million real estate investment fraud scheme, raising money from investors nationwide, many of whom are seniors, promising guaranteed high returns via real estate investments. Another PONZI FRAUD bites the dust.

The SEC complaint alleges that Friedman diverted substantial investor money to ventures that were unrelated to real estate, and misappropriated at least $17 million to support his hyperlavish lifestyle, including purchases of a luxury home, cars, vacations, jewellery, and designer clothing for himself and a female of his acquaintance. The SEC has frozen DLG’s, AEI’s and Friedman’s assets.

OK, small fry compared with Madoff, Stanford, the Bushes, the Clintons, Dr Alan ‘god’ Greenspoon, and all the other notorious criminals that we have to report about. But shoals of ‘little fish’ like this sheister are cruising for the appropriate bruising, and it’ll continue like this for YEARS AND YEARS.

Mopping up the lesser sheisters makes US law enforcement, after years of neglect, both look good and feel good about itself: whereas, what is actually happening is that most Americans are asking with extreme impatience, now: WHY ARE THE GIGA-CROOKS WALKING, when they should all have been arrested and decapitated BEFORE THIS PREDICTED CRISIS RAN OUT OF CONTROL?

• The sordid answer which is being SUPPRESSED is this: ‘BECAUSE WE WANT TO BE PAID, TOO’.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

Advertisements

One thought on “QUEEN’S $52 BILLION STOLEN UNDER OBAMA’S REGIME

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s