Tuesday 7 April 2009 00:01





























• MADOFF ‘VICTIMS’ LIST: Two reports were posted on 6th February 2009 containing the entire list of customers of Bernard L. Madoff Securities, Inc.. Because the list is so huge, we divided it into two segments: Clients A-N; and clients O-Z, plus a Miscellaneous Section. See: Archive. Our list is the easiest to load and clearest of the lists that have been reproduced privately on the Internet.

• We have just published: International Currency Review Volume 34, #2 on Systemic Fraudulent Finance and The Legalisation of Financial Corruption. Also just published are issues of our titles Economic Intelligence Review, London Currency Report, Interest Rate Service and Arab-Asian Affairs. For further details, please check the second white panel on the Home Page.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice is comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the Internet Security Solution software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

• DONATIONS: You can help finance these exposures (which the Editor has to prepare on top of his normal publishing responsibilities) by sending us a donation. Press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

• The CONTACT US facility is found in the red box throughout this combined website.


Indicative of the supreme arrogance of the cabal of internationalists (globalists) who think they know best for the whole of humanity, the controlled British Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, inserted the keywords ‘New World Order’ in his tedious sermon at the Group of Twenty indulgence-fest on 2nd April. Manifestly, the intelligence operative who wrote that speech for him looks upon those who don’t sit on their brains with utter contempt.

It was Mr Gorbachëv (Orbach or Korbach) who recycled this World Revolution control-phrase in the late 1980s, and it was his clandestine ally, George H. W. Bush Sr., who trumpeted the phrase for the benefit of those whom Lenin called ‘the interested’ in the early 1990s.

The purpose of this gratuitous insult to our collective intelligence was to remind those whom Lenin called ‘the interested’ and their fellow-travellers that the G-20 bore-event was about progressing The New Underworld Order, by leveraging the consequences of years of purposely implemented Fraudulent Finance in the interests of the broader globalist agenda – a supposedly ‘Great Leap Forward’ towards an agenda that NOBODY in the world WANTS, beyond the tawdry confines of the controlled, self-important creatures who think they have a right to dictate how humanity should be directed, managed, destroyed, or all of the above.

The British taxpayer was reportedly lumbered with a bill for £50 million to pay for Brown’s globalist jamboree, which issued a Communiqué that conspicuously OMITTED any mention of the following keywords/phrases, thereby signalling with crystal cynical clarity that it did not address the issues underlying this criminal finance crisis:

• Derivatives or ‘Structured Products’

• Fraudulent Finance

• Criminal Finance

• Toxic Assets

• Legacy Assets

• Bribery

• Corruption

• Mafia/mafiya

• Tax evasion

• Drugs, drug-trafficking

• Inflation

• Hyperinflation

Thus the Communiqué SIDESTEPPED the issues that should have been discussed, in favour of bromides for the benefit of the gullible ‘mainstream’ media hoardes for whose ears the entire orchestrated charade was choreographed. The omission of ANY MENTION of these issues in the Communiqué reveals the total contempt of these people for the Press Room.

For days after this circus, the talking heads were still ‘analysing’ the ‘outcome’ of the G-20 meeting on the basis of the diversionary bromide-style Communiqué, thereby plastering the entire world with vacuous interpretations of what the ‘chosen’ operatives striding the revolutionary stage were imagined to have ‘agreed’ – without addressing the fundamental issues summarised above which are the keywords that these ‘analysts’ should have been searching for if they had been equipped with any discernment about what was going on.

• Update! Someone on The Times, London, has noticed that the Communiqué had NOTHING to say about Derivatives a.k.a. Toxic Assets a.k.a. ‘Structured Products’ a.k.a. FRAUDULENT FINANCE!
Writing in The Times, David Wighton argues that despite recognition by G-20 leaders that dealing with banks’ so-called ‘toxic assets’ is vital for the global recovery, very little was said about it in the official Communiqué. He adds: “Now that Mr Sarkozy and Mme Merkel have their crackdown on tax havens, perhaps they can show some leadership on more urgent problems”. [INCREDIBLE!!!!!!!!!!].

ACTUALLY, NOTHING WHATSOEVER was mentioned about Derivatives a.k.a. Toxic Assets a.k.a. ‘Structured Products’ a.k.a. FRAUDULENT FINANCE, because THEY ARE TRYING TO KICK-START THE CRIMINAL OPERATIONS and they don’t want the diverted press to focus on what they are doing. Furthermore, criminal operatives at the highest levels of Governments are vulnerable to EXPOSURE for their own participation in the ransacking of trillions of dollars.

•FACT: The REASON for the current ‘constipated’ state of affairs is that processes are in motion that threaten to entrap and expose VERY BIG NAMES; and everyone concerned is TERRIFIED that the lid cannot be forced down on the cauldron. That’s what the litigation referenced at the end of this report is all about, BUT IT’S MUCH, MUCH BIGGER than even the closest observers realise.

• MORE ARRESTS were reported to us in the afternoon of 7th April. This contradicts intelligence to the effect that anyone standing in the way will now, post G-20, be ‘eliminated’, but that does not preclude ongoing arrests of other co-conspirators and accessories to the fact of misdemeanours.
In fact, ‘liquidations’, we understand, have been ongoing for at least three weeks.

For (see below) the G-20 was a WATERSHED beyond which date the leeway shown to saboteurs in the past will no longer apply. It is surprising, perhaps, to hear of arrests still taking place. What is quite clear is that the Illuminati’s internal war, or the global financial intelligence warfare, has been ratcheted up to a much higher level of intensity. The G-20 event was probably the last time anyone on this foul stage crawling with rats is going to waste time trying to be polite. They had no choice on 1st-2nd April, because they were in the presence of The Queen, who is invariably very polite and is the epitome of good manners. But powerful operatives holding the highest official positions who have stolen vast sums of money and are desperate to avoid being exposed, are not about to waste time being polite, when they are so terrified of being fingered, and jailed for life.

The Editor had numerous better things to do than watch and listen to the wall-to-wall opinionated revolutionary internationalist propaganda drivel spouted by Gordon Brown, and has long since suffered from EGO (Eyes Glaze Over) at the sight of President Obama hogging yet another podium and lecturing the whole world, Fidel Castro-like, on what (unspoken) his DVD-CIA handlers want to eventuate. The arrogance of these controlled operatives who leverage power on the globalists’ stage is hard for normal people, let alone for jaundiced observers not accustomed to sitting on their brains, to tolerate.

But the silver lining here is that if these operatives continue thaumatroping (1) humanity with their sterile sermons, the whole world will soon be ‘switched off’ by this agitation, propaganda and self-regarding indulgence, which of course would be a Good Thing.

And indeed this is what will happen because if one fact is certain here, it is that these opinionated would-be jumped-up re-orderers of the world have no sense of proportion, no idea when they are overstepping the mark, and no inclination to cease and desist from their preaching of control-drivel for the supposed ‘benefit’ of humanity. Which of course is all very decidedly GERMAN.

The Dachau-based long-range Nazi strategic deception community behind the ‘globalisation’ thrust towards The New Underworld Order to procure German hegemony displays the one ineradicable characteristic of these people: an inability to know when to stop. This fatal characteristic was on display even as late as 1945, when Hitler was ordering his Generals to continue the War long after the remaining sparrows clinging to the few extant Berlin lamp posts knew that it had been lost.

Which can remind us that the Nazi intelligentsia, who had decamped to the German Geopolitical Centre in Franco’s Madrid by 1942, were indifferent about the fate of Herr Hitler (Schickelgrüber), a criminal operative dredged up from the back streets of Vienna whom they regarded as expendable. On the contrary, they relished the post-Hitler prospect of implementing a sinister, gradualist long-range deception strategy epitomised by the phrase, found in the captured ‘Madrid Circular Letter’ (circa 1951): ‘Für uns ist der Krieg niemals vorbei’ (‘For us the war never ended’).

And as we have repeatedly elaborated, the other ongoing Nazi slogan of specific relevance to America’s predicament today was: ‘We shall build the Thousand-year Reich on the Ruins of the United States’ – a strategy expertly implemented by the DVD’s supremo in the United States, Dr Henry (‘call me ‘Henny’: no thanks) Kissinger, a disgusting quadruple agent who moved seamlessly from Princess Diana’s memorial service in Westminster Abbey to a nightclub that same evening where he was observed googling at a bellydancer.

President Obama despatched Kissinger and the Bush Family’s primary legal ‘fixer’ and former US Secretary of State James A. Baker III to Moscow in March to conduct discussions with the covert Soviets under Medvedev and GRU-Prime Minister Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin. They subsequently returned to the United States, it is believed, in the company of Gorbachëv, the former Andropov (Lieberman)-era head of the CPSU’s all-powerful Administrative Department and the chief long-range implementer of Andropov’s strategic deception strategy.

The use by President Obama’s handlers of Kissinger and Baker for this mission indicates rather clearly that the US political parties are of course two wings of the single Political Power – which is controlled by the ‘State within the State’ Intelligence Power under the heel of Bush Sr., directed in turn by the probable DVD supremo on the block, Dr Henry Kissinger.

It was this German Jew who persuaded the erstwhile pornographer Gerald Ford (a.k.a. Leslie Lynch King Jr.) to sack William Colby as Director of Central Intelligence and to instal, in his place, George H. W. Bush Sr., of like German Jewish background, thereby taking over the Central Intelligence Agency on behalf of the heirs of the Nazi Abwehr, Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst.

To ensure the ‘permanent’ allegiance of the CIA criminal enterprise (Bush Jr. referred to it as ‘our enterprise’) to the DVD, Bush Sr. later procured the renaming of the CIA’s Langley campus as the George Bush Center for Intelligence, which should read ‘George Bush Center for Terrorism’.

Vituperative, uncontrolled fury emitted from certain quarters against The Queen and the British generally reflects anger at the reality that the Nazi DVD controllers are most decidedly NOT getting everything their own way ‘as we speak’. Some sources of these ignorant ventilations also fail to understand that France and Germany are basically interchangeable under the terms of the Treaty of the Elysée of 23rd January 1963, which is of INDEFINITE duration and specifically requires these two powers to reach quote ‘an analogous position’ unquote ahead of every international meeting involving both powers, in perpetuity.

Therefore, while Sarkozy and Merkel are at loggerheads (see below), they are simultaneously bound by the terms of that never-ending bilateral treaty, which is why they always pontificate IN UNISON against ‘the Anglo-Saxons’ (another piece of egregious nonsense) whenever one of these set-piece New World Order theatres is to be staged at some place near you (2).

Since the G-20 meeting, tensions between Sarkozy and Merkel are reported to have reached close to boiling point. We have been informed that President Obama did sign a document at that event requiring the releases to proceed – and that President Sarkozy was perhaps unwisely mollified by this development, so that he was able to set aside his earlier threat to implement his planned walk-out should the ‘deliverables’ not be forthcoming. That threat, it will be recalled, had been directed against the US President.

So one can imagine President Sarkozy’s unrestrained fury when he discovered, subsequent to the G-20 meeting, that Mr George Bush Sr.’s agent, Chancellor Angela Merkel, who has been bribed by Bush Sr. for about five years to stand guard over his accumulated ill-gotten gains stashed within the German financial system, has continued to stand in the way of the releases since 2nd April.

• STASI operative Merkel of course implements strategy and tactics dictated to her by the Nazi strategic deception continuum, Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst, Dachau, as well.

Given this stand-off, the apoplectic Sarkozy, who now hates the Bushes with a vengeance because (typically) he was double-crossed by George Bush Sr., is reported to have threatened Chancellor Merkel with ‘elimination’ if she continues to block the settlements, which is what she is reported to be doing. Specifically, Sarkozy is reported to have told the German Chancellor: ‘You have to do this, or you’re going to be gone’.

This huge breach between the Treaty of the Elysée partners has now become so extreme, that it threatens to scupper not just the 1963 bilateral Treaty of the Elysée, which is the foundation stone of forced ‘European unity’ itself, but also the cohesion of the German Nazis’ long-range entrapment strategy, the European Union Collective, which is based upon the structure mapped out in the Nazi document Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft (European Economic Community) published in Berlin in 1942, as previously (and repeatedly) reported by this service (3).

The irony is that while Chancellor Merkel is implementing DVD blocking tactics, to sabotage the releases, she is also taking the risk that her intransigence in deference to the DVD and Bush Sr. will in fact rip the Elysée Treaty and therefore the European Union apart, thereby destroying the framework for German regional hegemony strategy – another instance of the German Nazi habit of always going too far.

A further irony here is that if Chancellor Merkel persists with her blocking behaviour, unless she is eliminated as Sarkozy has threatened, she will be doing us and the whole world an immense favour by perversely dismantling the insidious entrapment structure developed by the wartime Nazis and the German Geopolitical Centre in Madrid which has almost brought Britain to its knees.

The post-G-20 situation is meanwhile associated with a heightening of the intensity of the ongoing Illuminati bloodbath arising from this self-inflicted crisis. Hitherto this bloodletting has continued at a relatively subdued level, with banking sector saboteurs being ‘apprehended’ or arrested, rather than necessarily liquidated. But since the G-20 meeting, sanctions for any failure to cooperate as required have been sharply escalated. We understand that no leeway or mercy will now be shown, and that these sanctions are already being applied.

This is why we are now authoritatively advised that crooked bankers (and probably also corrupt Trustees) who sabotage any element of the post-G-20 financial release procedures will no longer simply be arrested, but will be ‘eliminated’ on the spot – by which is meant that they will be shot dead on sight, or else will be ‘zapped’ so that they suffer a heart attack.

Taken in the context of President Sarkozy’s reported threat that Chancellor Merkel will herself be ‘eliminated’ if her intransigence in blocking the settlements continues, we can now see that, post-G-20, the temperature and the level of international tension has been significantly raised – and that the G-20’s decisions are being perversely sabotaged by Germany.

This was probably inevitable, since tensions were already extremely high prior to the G-20 meeting, as witnessed by Sarkozy’s threat to walk out if the ‘deliverables’ were again impeded. So, having been through that ghastly meeting and having been deceived into believing that agreement to proceed with the releases had been reached, President Sarkozy feels bitterly betrayed by his own supposed ‘ally’, to whom he is supposed to be bound until the end of the solar system by the 1963 perpetual Treaty of the Elysée.

On the basis of past experience, this further satanic theatre of the absurd may just represent yet another instance of the dialectical game that these criminal operatives play, whereby yesterday’s identified villain is today’s beneficial influence, and tomorrow’s villain is a third party we hadn’t previously thought of. On the other hand, something tells the Editor that these new developments represent a very serious escalation of international tensions, exacerbated by fury at the objective fact that these ‘leaders’ assembled at great inconvenience and big expense to appear en masse in Canning Town with false smiles all round, only to find afterwards that the somewhat arrogant and disliked STASI-Chancellor Merkel was sabotaging part of the secret outcome of their meeting.

In particular the Editor was singularly impressed by the fact that as soon as he mentioned the intelligence, obtained from another source, that bankers standing in the way of the releases post-G-20 would be IMMEDIATELY ELIMINATED, this was instantly confirmed as accurate by a respected informant who could not have revealed it unless it had been mentioned by the Editor first.

• We were told: people who stand in the way will find that ‘they didn’t get to go home’.

In this connection, it is understood that two senior Directors on the Board of Citibank/Citigroup were ‘eliminated’ last week. When the Editor enquired whether this implied what he assumed it meant, the answer was in the affirmative; and the sources elaborated that ‘we think that they were zapped in some manner and suffered heart attacks’.

Intelligence input received by this service also confirms that, standing in front of the Bush-Clinton-DVD-CIA Criminal Nexus, the three parties that have sabotaged the releases and the ‘final solution’ of this infernal Illuminati warfare all along have been the Rothschilds, the Connecticut Trust group of Trustee operatives, and Citibank. According to certain Jewish sources, no less, the Rothschilds’ behaviour has been dictated by their unwillingness to ‘lose their control’, or at least the degree of control to which they have been accustomed for generations.

Either during or shortly after the G-20 display in Canning Town, Russian and Chinese intelligence operatives (collaborating together under their long-range cooperative alliance) travelled to Paris, where they advised the Rothschilds there, that their ‘time is up’ and that they are required to yield. We were unable to establish why it was necessary for the Russians and Chinese to do this in Paris, given that the Rothschilds are headquartered these days in London. But it was stressed that the visit was not exactly a ‘friendly’ encounter.

And as previously noted, the Connecticut Trust group of Trustees, working for George Bush Sr., have indeed been in the habit of waiting for each successive attempt to procure the releases to be announced, attending at the relevant bank at the appointed date and time, creaming off the profit, and distributing it to designated recipients, as a consequence of which very large sums of money have accumulated in the bank accounts in question.

Further corrupt activity along these lines by these people will, we understand, result in them being summarily executed, like any bankers that may be foolish enough to persist, post-G-20, in standing in the way of resolution. A number of such Trustees have been ‘disposed of’ in the past after they got ‘too greedy’, but in the post-G-20 environment, no leeway is going to be allowed at all – which means that if this satanic impasse continues, we are going to see a number of bankers shot dead or ‘zapped’ in their offices, and Trustees gunned down at point blank range in the street.

As for Citibank, it seems that our early description of this institution as a criminal enterprise was a grotesque understatement on our part.

The British press confirmed on 6th April 2009 that Iceland has hired Eva Joly, a Norwegian-French investigating magistrate who specialises in preparing complex fraud prosecutions, to advise the investigators and identify evidence of corruption. It will be recalled that the Bush Crime Family had been using Iceland as a laundering centre for elements of its Fraudulent Finance operations, and that the entire Icelandic financial system and the Icelandic krona went into meltdown last October after the Government had been forced to seize Kaupthing, Landsbanki and Glitnir, the country’s largest banks. Clearly, the Icelandic meltdown was an immediate consequence of the drying-up of liquidity in the system following the ‘lockdown’ event on 10th-12th September 2008 [see below].

The Daily Telegraph reported that a source close to the investigation said:

“We need serious help from Europe and the United Kingdom and tax havens to deal with the international aspects of this because it looks like there was a very elaborate network of crossholdings and money flowing overseas. It’s absolutely mind-boggling”.

It also looks as though the Icelandic authorities could benefit by a closer study of the background to their troubles, which they may not have understood, at the outset anyway: and that a good place for them to start might be with this website service.

The Franco-German Treaty of the Elysée was promoted by Dr Konrad Adenauer, the former Nazi-era Mayor of Cologne and friend of Schickelgrüber’s favourite German Jewish bankers, Drs Abs and Pferdmenges. Chancellor Adenauer is notorious for having told the Bundesrat that ‘we must never let the West know that our true orientation lies to the East’ – reflecting the historical realities that Nazism (National Socialism) and Communism (International Socialism) are dialectical twins and that German intelligence was resident inside the Kremlin (as it has been inside the White House and Downing Street) for many years: which explains the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact, and why the Nazis alternated between alliance with the German asset Josef Stalin (who weakened Russia by liquidating the officer corps) and attacking Russia, like rats in a sack. Among these Luciferian beings, loyalties and allegiances are strictly ephemeral, expendable, replaceable, and perfunctory.

The same has always been true of the DVD operative Mr George H. W. Bush Sr., whose modus operandi has invariably been the ‘bait and switch’ technique of turning on his trading partners (Saddam Hussein, Misolevic, Noriega, Sarkozy) as soon as they become too powerful, inciting his monumental lust and jealousy. Indeed the ‘bait and switch’ technique is quintessentially Leninist: and since the United States is in fact structured just like an overt Marxist-Leninist state, this should come as no surprise, either.

All overt Communist states have a ‘Security Council’ which is superior to the Government itself – the same model as is evident in the United States, where the National Security Council (NSC) appears to be subordinate to the Presidency but in fact tells it what to do.

In other key respects, too, the US control structure is identical to that of overt Communist régimes – with the standard power triangle consisting of the Intelligence Power (the ‘State within the State’), which is answerable to no-one, supposedly balanced by the Military Power (which it controls) and the Party (which it also controls, and which in the United States is divided into the two dialectical false ‘opposites’, Republican and Democrat).

That the Party is ONE is evident from the seamless interaction between the two wings – so that President Obama has no problem sending his supposed Republican ‘rivals’ Kissinger and Baker to Moscow to talk with the other false dialectical World Revolution ‘opposites’, the covert Soviets.

If we step back for a moment to reflect on the staged propaganda delivered to the world by Messrs Brown and Obama in recent days, we can short-circuit queries about the bona fides of these two characters quite simply. The elementary way to establish whether Obama and Brown are genuine or controlled (a simple test that applies to everyone else on the stage as well), is to ask (even though we all know the answer):

• Has President Obama ordered the CIA to get out of drug trafficking?

• Has Prime Minister Gordon Brown ordered Government Operations-2 (GO-2) within MI6 to get out of drug distribution via its control of the two drug cartels distributing drugs in the United Kingdom, and its financing of the main political parties using drug money proceeds?

Of course the answer to both questions is no. By extension, we can further ask the subsidiary question: are they serving the interests of the American/British peoples, or not? And again the answer has to be: they can’t be, otherwise this would be their top priority, wouldn’t it. In that case, if they aren’t serving the interests of their populations, they must be serving some other interest – namely, of course, the internationalist One World Agenda, operating CONTRARY to the interests of the nation state, which it seeks to obliterate. Since the nation state is the natural human condition and has been found to serve the preferences and interests of human beings best, it follows that the One World Agenda does not meet the requirements of human beings, and can never do so.

France, Germany, China, the ‘former’ Soviet Union, Israel and other countries are also in the drug business: but that’s not the point. The issue is: do our leaders serve our interests?

And clearly, since they preside over Governments that are engaged in satanic operations (drug-trafficking and distribution) the purpose of which is to make money out of destroying people’s lives, they most certainly do not.

If Brown and Obama had stood on that Canning Town platform and condemned drug-trafficking and the participation of their own structures in this heinous activity, one might have been excused for perhaps taking them seriously.

And there are plenty of other devilish government-sanctioned activities to which they should be opposed, as well. But since neither of these ‘leaders’ condemned them – making no mention of any of the foregoing fundamental causes of the criminal finance crisis, which is degrading the whole world, in their pompous globalist dirges – neither of these two operatives should command our respect: except that President Obama is Head of State and, as previously mentioned, whatever the personality occupying this position, he or she must command a degree of deference because he or she represents the people who are, or ought to be (but are not), sovereign.

In 2005, a US operative said to the Editor of this service: ‘Don’t attack the drug operatives, or they will kill you’. Oh, so the problem is insoluble, is it? It can’t be resolved because anyone standing up to them will be murdered? President Obama cannot be expected to do the right thing because it’s too dangerous? Brown, ditto?

• Here’s a consideration for your attention. We have just broken this taboo. Would good people who may be reading this report care to join in? By all means reproduce what we have published here: be the Editor’s guest.

Now you will doubtless recall that, as previously reported by this service, the Executive Director of UNODC, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Sr. Antonio Maria Costa, was interviewed in the January 2009 issue of the Austrian journal Profil, and that in that interview he stated that in the second half of 2008 (a period which we think extended from mid-September onwards: see below), the ‘only new liquidity’ in the interbank market was drug money.

The other sources had been closed off – especially the illegal and corrupt misuse of the $14.0 trillion funds, including the Queen’s LOAN money within a total of $6.2 trillion that had been made available to finance the private sector on-the-books Refunding Programme which is the SOLUTION to the crisis, as agreed by the Group of Seven leading financial powers in June 2007, when The Queen appealed for this transparent trading to proceed ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’. The G-7 re-approved the private sector, revenue-generating refunding of the US Dollar System in 2008.

Following advice given and the steps taken at the beginning of September 2008, these funds (the entire $14.0 trillion) were placed into ‘lockdown’ between 10th and 12th September 2008, so that they could no longer be illegally exploited to finance the carousel, as previously explained. It was then only a matter of time before the Bush Crime Family-linked Madoff Ponzi scamming machine ran into severe trouble, in the context of the reported $7.0 billion of redemptions.

(Obviously it didn’t help that, according to The Jerusalem Post, Madoff had transferred $35 billion to the Israel Discount Bank via 181,000 separate wire transfers in the names of individual investors between March 2004 and the same month a year later) (4).

When ‘Sir’ R. Allen Stanford realised what was happening, he started to arrange for monies to be diverted from his various bank accounts – a state of affairs known to his one-man Antigua-based accountant, whose contract with Stanford expired on 31st December 2008. The accountant died suddenly on 1st January 2009.

From the information about drug money flows implied and given above, it can be assumed that one reason why the Great Powers do nothing whatsoever to terminate their structures’ drug-trafficking operations (except via token programmes designed to deflect criticism for public consumption) is that the resulting money flows lubricate the interbank market.

Which of course ties the banks, which are criminal enterprises, into the drug-trafficking business – explaining the corruption of the banks, which is justified on the basis of the argument that banks are neutral institutions which simply handle money flows.

Therefore, attempting to impose discipline and ‘standards’ on banks while Governments continue to sponsor and indulge in drug-trafficking, represents yet another display of the familiar duplicitous double-mindedness with which we have become familiar as we steadily strip the putrid layers of criminality off the legs of the criminal Octopus.

As in the United States, agents for the long-range Nazi strategic deception apparat are buried deep inside the UK structures, such as the Cabinet Office, the Treasury, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, the UK Ministry of Defence, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and the Department for Work and Pensions.

For instance, the ‘Europe Minister’, a ‘Blair Babe’ called Caroline Flint, said at the beginning of April that every operational unit of the British Army, the Royal Navy and the Royal Air Force will soon be available to fight under the EU flag in future wars ‘as part of an EU ‘force catalogue’’. Such crass, revolutionary anti-nation state abominations perpetrated by brainwashed political puppets proceed even as the German operation to entrap its Member States, most importantly Britain, is running into the sand as discussed above – reminding us that the EU is a deliberately structured ‘automaton’ which may keep on functioning long after its underpinning foundations have collapsed beneath it.

Moreover key personnel at the Bank of England have also been instrumental in furthering the long-range Abwehr strategy, whether ‘on the payroll’ or due to blackmail or other satanic pressures.

Thus a key figure at the Bank is a known de facto German agent, with an offshore bank account with Henry Ansbacher, British Virgin Islands (which harbours about 400,000 offshore corporations, the documents for which are stored in a concrete building there).

This crucial information emerged following the previously reported seizure by 300 heavily armed Metropolitan Police of the ‘Safety Lock Boxes’ in Mayfair, Edgeware and Hampstead on 2nd June 2008, as previously reported. ‘Payroll’ funds paid to this corrupt de facto agent for the DVD are believed to be siphoned via Deutsche Bank and UBS to the named bank in the British Overseas Territory, for the beneficiary whose account is in the name of Passenham.

In this context it is to be noted that the British Government is now in the process of bringing in legislation at Westminster, following a Commission of Inquiry headed by a British Judge, Sir Robin Auld, to suspend the Constitution of the Turks and Caicos Islands, to remove the Government and Cabinet, to close the single-camera House of Parliament (the House of Assembly) and to assume direct rule under the control of the Governor for an initial period of two years, in order to get to grips with the rampant corruption throughout the Territory‘s structures that the Commission has uncovered. The draft Order-in-Council to put this process into effect was submitted to Her Majesty The Queen in Council on 18th March and was laid before Parliament on 25th March. On the basis of current information, the takeover is expected to come into effect late this month.

Our Latin American service, The Latin American Times [Volume 20, Number 9], to be published in May 2009, will be devoted to this development.

The Editor’s experience all his reporting life is that we stick our necks out in anticipation of what will take place. What we predict then takes place. Many months, perhaps even a year or more later, academics too timid to run the risk of sticking their necks out realise that what was predicted has indeed taken place. They then proceed to muscle in and to pontificate on the subject, having failed to anticipate what was coming down, but now, with the benefit of hindsight, claiming 100% of the credit for their ‘wise prognostications’ for themselves.

Current instances of this syndrome include pronouncements by the Nobel Laureate (therefore by definition, ‘prescient’) economist Joseph Stiglitz, and Professor K. Black, a Professor of Economics and Law with the University of Missouri:

• Dr Joseph Stiglitz, 3rd April 2009: ‘The Obama Administration’s $500 billion or more proposal to deal with America’s ailing banks has been described by some in the financial markets as a win-win-win proposal’, Stiglitz writes in The New York Times.

‘Actually, it’s a win-win-lose proposal: the banks win, investors win, and taxpayers lose’.

The (Geithner) proposal is ‘marked by overleveraging in the public sector, excessive complexity, poor incentives and a lack of transparency’, Stiglitz says.

‘The Government plan in effect involves insuring almost all losses. Since the private investors are spared most losses, then they primarily ‘value’ their potential gains’.

• Professor William K. Black, 5th April 2009: In an interview on the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) Bill Moyers Journal, William K. Black, Professor of Economics and Law at the University of Missouri, alleged that American banks and credit agencies conspired to create a system in which so-called ‘liars’ loans’ could receive AAA ratings and zero oversight, amounting to a truly massive FRAUD at the epicentre of American finance. But worse still, claimed Dr Black, Timothy Geithner, President Barack Obama’s Secretary of the Treasury, is currently engaged in a cover-up to keep the truth of America’s insolvency from its citizens’.

We can’t be bothered right now to sock you all of Professor Black’s prognostications: but if you have time to track them down on the Internet, you may, uh, come across a good deal of ‘thinking’ that you’ll instantly ‘recognise’ from your very assiduous reading of these reports and, if you are a subscriber, from your study of our analyses in successive issues of International Currency Review.

• For all of the above, please see these reports and successive issues of our journals, passim.

The G-20 Communiqué (5) recycled the phrase that has been repeatedly used by Prime Minister Brown and his beleaguered and somewhat baffled Chancellor of the Exchequer, Alastair Darling, namely that ‘we have today pledged to do WHATEVER IS NECESSARY’ to:

• Restore confidence, growth, and jobs [unspoken: that we have destroyed by permitting and indulging in Fraudulent Finance];

• Repair the financial system [unspoken: that we have destroyed ditto] to restore lending;

• Strengthen financial regulation [unspoken: in order to regain former control over what our own permissive behaviour allowed to get completely out of control] to rebuild trust [unspoken: which our wayward, wilful and reprobate Fraudulent Finance behaviour, corruption, lies and systematic deception may have permanently destroyed];

• Fund [unspoken: using stolen and diverted funds and money created from the illicit use of other people’s money such as that of The Queen, in defiance of the legal principle that ‘the money you make from your illicit use of my money is my money’] and reform [unspoken: which we have been talking and doing not a lot about for years] our international financial institutions to overcome this crisis [unspoken: of our own making] and prevent future ones [unspoken: that is to say, crises of our own making that run beyond our control, like this one];

• Promote global trade and investment [unspoken: because we realise that in our greed and in pursuit of our secret agendas, we have come close to destroying ‘our global economy’, ‘globalism’ and therefore our planned route towards The New Underworld Order] and reject protectionism [which would complete the process of destroying our One World model], to underpin prosperity [unspoken: by which we really mean ‘to put our globalist model back together again]; and:

• Build an inclusive [globalist cliché], green [globalist cliché implying the unproven ideology of global warming] and sustainable recovery [globalist cliché: the standard overuse of the weasel word ‘sustainable’ implies that ‘if we don’t do what we are ordering the ‘planet’ to do, humanity will perish – a lie based upon the fallacy that the earth’s resources are finite, which is not true. At the time of Christ, there would have been perhaps 50-100 million people on earth. There are now 6.5 billion; and we are all breathing].

The Communiqué is full of this familiar globalist language, embracing ideologically ‘uncontestable’ presumptions which mask crude propaganda that is not to be challenged by simple people like us.

However Paragraph 6 contained actual SUBSTANCE, even though its CONTENT was masked in G-20-‘speak’ – the OPERATIVE keyword here being FISCAL:

‘6. We are undertaking a concerted fiscal expansion, which will save or create millions of jobs which would otherwise have been destroyed, and that will, by the end of next year, amount to $5 trillion, raise output by 4 per cent, and accelerate the transition to a green economy. We are committed to deliver the scale of sustained fiscal effort necessary to restore growth’.

But if we just take the British situation, there is no scope for ‘fiscal stimulus’ (reducing taxes) at all: in fact, in deference to German policy which is being served by the behaviour of the Governor of the Bank of England, who presided over the mismanagement of a (deliberately?) failed gilt issue the other day, the Chancellor of the Exchequer has actually been talking about RAISING TAXES, i.e. producing a deflationary budget later this month WHICH WILL MAKE THE SITUATION VERY MUCH WORSE. This is EXACTLY in line with covert DVD strategy to decapitate the British economy.

• FACT: In line with their slogan ‘For us the war never ended’, German (Nazi) strategists consider all economic policy to represent a pretext for economic warfare.

So what does Paragraph 6 mean by FISCAL?

The G-7-Approved private sector Refunding Programme of transparent trades yielding TAXABLE REVENUE to reliquefy the banks ON THE BOOKS, is the ONLY means whereby FISCAL STIMULUS can be delivered in the prevailing circumstances.

• FACT: The $5.0 trillion mentioned in Paragraph 6 refers to the tax that will have been raised on the books from the proceeds of the private sector Refunding Programme by the end of 2010.

By contrast, ‘Geithnerism’ – the son of ‘Paulsonism’ – involving the reckless, open-ended creation of Treasury debt in the background, creates no revenue at all, since by definition the public sector generates debt whereas it is ONLY the private sector that can generate TAXABLE REVENUE.

Therefore, it is clear that Paragraph 6 refers to the intended transparent private sector Refunding Programme, which, as this service has repeatedly sought to explain, both in these reports and in our printed subscription services, provides the SOLUTION to the crisis.

Indeed, the crisis would never have reached ‘train wreck’ status if this solution had been applied as soon as it had been approved by the Group of Seven financial powers in 2007. Instead of which, the criminal Paulson-Bush Jr. Treasury chose, as the Obama Treasury has also done, the corrupt off-balance sheet method – in a display of wanton arrogance and stupidity that defies belief, since the owners of the brains in question have more than enough ‘smarts’ between them to have been able to discern the correct way forward.

But crude self-enrichment and financing The New Underworld Order remained the priority, with the disastrous consequences that we predicted on 2nd September 2006 and again in December that year, and in our ‘train wreck’ reports in the summer of 2007: a disgraceful and disgusting display of opinionated, reprobate US official misbehaviour that cannot be expunged from the record (even though the ‘mainstream’ media is doing its best here) given that International Currency Review is resident all over the world, as a witness to these deliberate, criminal abominations.

Which brings us to what may have been said during the prolonged private meeting between the Queen and President Obama on 1st April 2009. After hastily trying to expunge the insults heaped upon the British during Mr Brown’s earlier visit to Washington, as we have described, President Obama’s minders stood on their heads and started promulgating the opposite message, namely that the ‘Special Relationship’ (so comprehensively mangled by criminalised American Administrations) is greatly to be valued, while our head of State is a jewel without compare (true).

Even so, President Obama arrived under a cloud, as implied by our ‘interview’ between The Queen and the President (see reports from 26th to 31st March 2009 – this text being so close to the reality that certain forces had it ‘snipped’ from our original report).

Now self-evidently, there would have been no flies on any wall inside Buckingham Palace. But even if a microphone had been installed within a picture frame above the Royal mantlepiece, no part of this supremely important private conversation could possibly, under any circumstances, have been leaked, and certainly not to the Editor of this service. That said, close observation left no doubt at all that The Queen deployed her unparalleled skills developed over 57 years of loyal service to place the young President at his ease, and then to persuade him that cooperation rather than confrontation would reap magnificent benefits for both parties, and for the whole world.

Since on-the-books private sector refunding using transparent, fully taxed trading operations yielding TAXABLE REVENUE in spades is the ONLY solution to the shambles created by the Bush-Paulson-Cheney criminal Administration, and exacerbated by the decisions taken under Geithner, and since transparent refunding will finance President Obama’s entire ambitious programme, with money to spare, it would appear that the Queen did not need to over-emphasise what the very intelligent President Barack Obama could certainly now see immediately for himself.

The unanswered question is whether his advisers, all of whom are linked to the Clinton Criminal Compartment of the CIA, had obfuscated this obvious solution or withheld any review of it from his attention – begging the further unanswered question as to whether President Obama was himself complicit in ignoring the G-7-Approved private sector Refunding Programme, or not.

But, as explained in the final brief update to our report dated 31st March, this is now, if the above assessment is correct, ‘water under the bridge’. What matters is that The Queen has diplomatically charmed and ‘turned’ President Obama in the interests of BOTH parties, and ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’. In the event that the Refunding Programme is sabotaged, then we would join those who proclaim that we are all doomed: but the indications are that it is to proceed.

Open domain indications that A GENUINE DISCONTINUITY occurred as a specific consequence of the successful meeting between The Queen and President Obama are oblique, but telling. We can start with smoke signals from the Federal Reserve which – significantly – began almost immediately after the G-20 theatrical display, and which represented a precise REVERSAL of what the Federal Reserve had been saying PRIOR to that date. To wit:

• Bloomberg, 3rd April 2009: ‘Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said the central bank must retain the flexibility to withdraw its record injection of credit into the economy to keep inflation in check when the crisis abates’.

‘The central bank’s emergency ‘activities must not constrain the exercise of monetary policy as needed to meet our Congressional mandate to foster maximum sustainable employment and stable prices’, Bernanke said in a speech in Charlotte, North Carolina’.

‘The US central bank has effectively printed money to buy or lend against a range of assets [sic – Ed.] to alleviate the credit crunch and revive the economy. Bernanke’s speech today detailed steps that the Fed can take to remove that liquidity’.

• Bloomberg, 4th April: ‘The Federal Reserve’s two top officials assured that they will pull back their emergency credit programs once the crisis fades, even as they prepare to flood the system further with in excess of $1.0 trillion’.

‘Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said yesterday in Charlotte, North Carolina, that the Fed must retain the flexibility to withdraw its record cash injections to restrain prices. Vice Chairman Donald Kohn said in Wooster, Ohio, ‘the trick will be unwinding this balance sheet in a timely way to avoid inflation’.

‘We can’t go into this without knowing how we are going to get out again’, Kohn, 66, who’s worked for the Fed almost four decades, said in response to a question after a speech at the College of Wooster, where he received a bachelor’s degree in economics’.

In the course of his comments in Ohio, Kohn also lifted the lid on ANOTHER debt-building operation which may be in the pipeline, thereby reconfirming what a dreadful mess the Federal Reserve and the Treasury find themselves in as a consequence of their participation in and accommodation of this Fraudulent Finance orgy that came to a juddering halt in September 2008.

According to Bloomberg:

‘Kohn said the Fed and Treasury are seeking ‘other tools’ from Congress to help mop up excess cash. One possibility is that the Fed issue its own securities, or ‘Fed bills’, or the Treasury could issue special bills, and put the cash on deposit at the Fed’.

‘“It is important to get either of those tools EXEMPT FROM THE DEBT CEILING so that the Fed could have the power to absorb all the reserves it wanted to”, Kohn said’.

This, of course, would destroy the residual purpose of the Statutory Debt Ceiling, which is all that remains of Congress’s power to curb excessive borrowing by the Government.

In other words, to get out of its ghastly bind, the Federal Reserve is now pushing for a breach in the Statutory Debt Ceiling, which the Congress traditionally guards like a hawk – since if it were to be discarded or eroded, the Legislative Branch would be unable to exercise any constraint at all on the permissive borrowing of the Executive Branch.

Now we have a choice here: we can speculate that this represents just the latest in a long line of demands by the Federal Reserve for the Legislature to furnish it with ‘whatever is necessary’ to enable it to overcome the calamity brought about by the fact that its previous Chairman, Dr Alan Greenspan, was DVD chieftain George H. W. Bush’s chief trader while also serving as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board; or we can speculate that, post-2nd April 2009, the Federal Reserve may be less concerned (assuming it ever was) about the Treasury’s colossal trash debt burden, given that it has had to recognise that the transparent private sector Refunding Programme generating windfall TAXABLE REVENUE is to go ahead from London, following the private meeting between The Queen and President Obama, so that there is nothing the Fed can do about it.

It is difficult to imagine how the Federal Reserve could possibly contemplate a full-frontal attack on Congress’s sacred Statutory Debt Limit if this were not the case.

As background, it is also a fact that private commentators are starting to deploy language that we have used for a long time in our reports. For instance, the US commentator Sean Brodrick stated on 1st April 2009 that bankers are financial terrorists and should be indicted. Thank you very much. Some of them may now be shot on sight: see above.

Beyond that, the following incredible state of affairs became apparent AFTER the conclusion of the overhyped G-20 theatrical display. What follows will stagger many people, no doubt.

Since we were double-crossed (see relevant reports dated 3rd and 18th March 2008), against the background of the de facto stealing of the Editor’s $35,000 private loan repayable with interest after two years on 11th June 2007, the Editor naturally severed relations with Mr Wanta. However on 24th March 2009, we received a copy of an email despatched by Wanta and addressed to an extended (revealed) list of media types, and to Attorney General Eric Holder, Lawrence Summers, Mr Paul A. Volcker, the Inspector General of the Federal Reserve, First Lady Michelle Obama, Valerie Jarrett, New York State Governor David A Patterson, Vice President Joseph Biden, US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, US Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, GAOFRAUDNET, the Joint Committee on Foreign Affairs, US Securities and Exchange Commission Enforcement Investigations, US Army Inspector General Green, US President Barack H. Obama and others, reading as follows:

Date: Tuesday, March 24, 2009, 11:51 am:
On advice of legal counsel, we will immediately seek treble damages from the US Department of the Treasury, et al, for lawless conversion of US Dollars 4.5 trillion plus daily interest accruals, and for denying me the lawful opportunity to pay my civil/repatriation income tax payment of US Dollars 1.575 trillion directly to our US Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Washington DC, USA, among other continuing incidents to be documented with extensive exhibits/documentation’.

President Obama… Thank you for trying, but it appears that our mutual attempt to cooperate and readily assist in the economic difficult times have fallen on deaf ears.

Thank you for your kind assistance.

Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta to the United Nations/USA/PRC/Republic of Singapore/State of Israel, Jerusalem.

Principality Central Bank Chairman.

Principality Trade Commissioner.

IT IS TIME………………“Never Let the Magic Dim”.

• Note: The ‘principality’ in question is a ‘micro-state’ in the Sydney, Australia, area calling itself The Principality of Snake Hill. The establishment of actual or ‘virtual’ micro-states (some of which are supposedly recognised by the United Nations) is a cynical operation of the globalist One World manipulators designed to hasten the fragmentation of the integrity of nation states. For instance, such a ‘micro-state’ exists inside the Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) complex outside Moscow.

We make no further comment on the above, and proceed now to two further comparably extraordinary developments.

On 3rd April, THE VERY DAY AFTER THE G-20 MEETING, Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., received a telephone call from the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Taxation asking him for filing and tax documentation in respect of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., Wanta’s corporation.

However it may be recalled that on 23rd March 2008, Wanta fired Michael Cottrell from his positions as Treasurer and Executive Vice President of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., by issuing and promulgating a three-page document called ‘Resolution of the Sole Shareholder’, whereas of course corporate resolutions are universally required to be Resolutions of the Board of Directors.

Equipped with this document, Mr Cottrell obtained the necessary forms from the Commonwealth of Virginia authorities and proceeded, with relief and at once, to file the necessary formal notices of his (irregular) ‘dismissal’ and his RESIGNATION dated 23rd March 2008 [see above] with the State tax authorities in Richmond, Commonwealth of Virginia.

But natürlich, on 3rd April 2009 the Virginia State authorities claimed, didn’t they, that they had no knowledge of that filing. Within half an hour, Michael Cottrell was of course able to fax copies of the documents that were filed with Virginia on 31st March 2008. Those papers necessarily stated that since Mr Cottrell was no longer Executive Vice President and Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., as of 23rd March 2008, all future enquiries and communications should be addressed to Mr Wanta at an address in the State of Wisconsin.

Again, bear in mind that this sudden interest on the part of the Virginia tax authorities surfaced IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE CLOSURE OF THE G-20 MEETING IN THE LONDON AREA.

Thirdly, we were informed, AGAIN on 3rd April 2009, by a knowledgeable US official source, that the State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue is to commence legal proceedings or has commenced legal proceedings to sue Bank of America, Richmond, for $4.5 trillion! See our Wantagate Petition for a Writ of Mandamus reports from June 2007 onwards, for background.

Now you may recall from our report dated 6th August 2007 that we have long since proved, with the assistance of documents (reproduced in International Currency Review) that the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue engaged in criminal conduct in charging Wanta THREE TIMES for State tax amounting to $14,129.00, which was paid twice, in May and then in June 1992, and a third time on 21st July 2005 using the Editor’s private LOAN funds. We also identified other respects in which criminal conduct by that Department was demonstrated.

The Editor attempted to assist Mr Wanta by asking the Wisconsin Court whether it would issue, following the ending of his probation as a consequence of the Editor’s payment effective 14th November 2005, the appropriate document recognising the restitution, but made no progress. Finally, on 17th October 2007, the Editor terminated this assistance by writing a Misprision of Felony letter to the relevant Judge in Wisconsin, drawing the Judge’s attention yet again to the matters displayed in our report dated 6th August 2007. All this information has been in the public domain in our financial journal and on this website for a very prolonged period of time.

We can comment no further on the specifics identified above. But what we CAN do, is draw your attention, finally, to the following considerations:

• As indicated, the telephone call from the Commonwealth of Virginia tax authorities and news of the Wisconsin Department of Revenue’s reported lawsuit against Bank of America BOTH occurred on 3rd April 2009, one day after the G-20 meeting.

• This clearly tends to support our assessment that A DECISIVE DISCONTINUITY amounting to ‘a resolution’ of key issues coincided with the G-20 event, arising from the meeting between The Queen and President Obama – ‘necessitating’ a CIA-contrived ‘collapsing’ operation (see below), (leaving aside the separate fact that Chancellor Merkel is reported, post-G-20, to be sabotaging the releases, as discussed above).

It could possibly be argued that the timing of the telephone call and the lawsuit information were both consequent specifically upon the issuance of Wanta’s notice of RICO action against the US Treasury; but in the overall G-20 context, that seems unlikely.

• The suing and cross-suing identified above represents a classic CIA IMPLOSION OPERATION, the overall purpose of which may well be to BURY this matter in a ‘Black’ avalanche of deliberately contrived confusion. It is associated with a parallel escalation of provocatively convoluted website confusion designed to intensify the impenetrable fog of disinformation, diversion, redirection and deception, with everyone portrayed to be fighting everyone else, and all at each other’s throats (a well-known cynical intelligence community obfuscation technique).

The intention of the lawsuits may be to ‘disappear’ the funds that have long since been stolen or diverted in a fog of cross-litigation lasting for years, with the prospect that cases will be dismissed and the entire matter wound up by process of exhaustion. Was this pre-planned? Of course it was.

• And was the advice given to Wanta to embark upon a RICO action ‘poisonous’ advice from a CIA lawyer? You decide.

The $6.2 trillion, of course, is not connected in any way with the foregoing, and was withdrawn as previously reported by this service, on 29th January 2009.


(1) The verb ‘to thaumatrope’: to bombard captive audiences with endless verbiage without regard for those forced to put up with this offensive, such that the thaumatroper is engaged in a verbal assault from which the audience cannot escape.

(2) Base allegations that the Editor is ‘anti-French’ or ‘anti-German’ represent the concoctions of diminished minds. The Editor has visited France all his life, speaks French and has close friends in France. He studied singing in Vienna and travelled extensively in Germany in younger days, and listens non-stop to German classical music. We are addressing the evils of Governments and of the globalist usurpers, not of the abused peoples they are supposed to be serving.

(3) See the Editor’s book The New Underworld Order, Chapter Ten: ‘The Thousand-Year Reich’, available from the Edward Harle Limited (intelligence books) section of this combined website.

(4) During dinner in a Tarrytown, NY, restaurant the other day, the Editor’s guest asked what proportion of the perpetrators of these financial crimes are of Jewish extraction, to which the Editor responded: ‘100%’ (not quite true, as Stanford isn’t Jewish: but he’s an exception).

A few days later, an American Jewish contact in London made the unsolicited pertinent point to the Editor that ordinary people of Jewish extraction are getting extremely concerned at what has been happening because, as he put it, ‘they don’t want to be the scapegoats again’. This point was also raised several years ago by a Jewish leader in New York, who warned that if the Jewish community did not take care, there might be a ‘repeat performance’: and this was long before most people had heard of Bernard L. Madoff. The Education Director of a US School and Synagogue who is a friend of the Editor was asked some years ago (by the Editor) what his community’s attitude was towards these Jewish criminals who give the community such a bad name. He responded: ‘These people are a grave and continuing worry to our community. It is a very serious problem’.

These observations should ‘pacify’ anyone of diminished mental capacity who may deduce that our use of the taboo word ‘Jewish’ has any implications whatsoever beyond stating facts as they are, rather than in conformity with mind-controlled ‘political correctness’. Finally, the Editor’s Jewish friends on both sides of the Atlantic openly share this assessment.

(5) The full text of the Group of Twenty Communiqué issued from the London Summit on 2nd April 2009, is appended here for the record:

1. We, the Leaders of the Group of Twenty, met in London on 2 April 2009.

2. We face the greatest challenge to the world economy in modern times; a crisis which has deepened since we last met, which affects the lives of women, men, and children in every country, and which all countries must join together to resolve. A global crisis requires a global solution.

3. We start from the belief that prosperity is indivisible; that growth, to be sustained, has to be shared; and that our global plan for recovery must have at its heart the needs and jobs of hard-working families, not just in developed countries but in emerging markets and the poorest countries of the world too; and must reflect the interests, not just of today’s population, but of future generations too. We believe that the only sure foundation for sustainable globalisation and rising prosperity for all is an open world economy based on market principles, effective regulation, and strong global institutions.

4. We have today therefore pledged to do whatever is necessary to:
• Restore confidence, growth, and jobs;
• Repair the financial system to restore lending;
• Strengthen financial regulation to rebuild trust;
• Fund and reform our international financial institutions to overcome this crisis and prevent future ones;
• Promote global trade and investment and reject protectionism, to underpin prosperity; and
• Build an inclusive, green, and sustainable recovery.

By acting together to fulfil these pledges we will bring the world economy out of recession and prevent a crisis like this from recurring in the future.

5. The agreements we have reached today, to treble resources available to the IMF to $750 billion, to support a new SDR allocation of $250 billion, to support at least $100 billion of additional lending by the MDBs, to ensure $250 billion worth of support for trade finance, and to use the additional resources from agreed International Monetary Fund gold sales for concessional finance for the poorest countries, constitute an additional $1.1 trillion programme of support to restore credit, growth and jobs in the world economy. Together with the measures we have each taken nationally, this constitutes a global plan for recovery on an unprecedented scale.

Restoring growth and jobs:

6. We are undertaking an unprecedented and concerted fiscal expansion, which will save or create millions of jobs which would otherwise have been destroyed, and that will, by the end of next year, amount to $5 trillion, raise output by 4 per cent, and accelerate the transition to a green economy. We are committed to deliver the scale of sustained fiscal effort necessary to restore growth.

7. Our central banks have also taken exceptional action. Interest rates have been cut aggressively in most countries, and our central banks have pledged to maintain expansionary policies for as long as needed and to use the full range of monetary policy instruments, including unconventional instruments, consistent with price stability.

8. Our actions to restore growth cannot be effective until we restore domestic lending and international capital flows. We have provided significant and comprehensive support to our banking systems to provide liquidity, recapitalise financial institutions, and address decisively the problem of impaired assets. We are committed to take all necessary actions to restore the normal flow of credit through the financial system and ensure the soundness of systemically important institutions, implementing our policies in line with the agreed G-20 framework for restoring lending and repairing the financial sector.

9. Taken together, these actions will constitute the largest fiscal and monetary stimulus and the most comprehensive support programme for the financial sector in modern times. Acting together strengthens the impact and the exceptional policy actions announced so far must be implemented without delay. Today, we have further agreed over $1 trillion of additional resources for the world economy through our international financial institutions and trade finance.

10. Last month the IMF estimated that world growth in real terms would resume and rise to over two percent by the end of 2010. We are confident that the actions we have agreed today, and our unshakeable commitment to work together to restore growth and jobs, while preserving long-term fiscal sustainability, will accelerate the return to trend growth. We commit today to taking whatever action is necessary to secure that outcome, and we call on the IMF to assess regularly the actions taken and the global actions required.

11. We are resolved to ensure long-term fiscal sustainability and price stability and will put in place credible exit strategies from the measures that need to be taken now so as to support the financial sector and restore global demand. We are convinced that by implementing our agreed policies we will limit the longer-term costs to our economies, thereby reducing the scale of the fiscal consolidation necessary over the longer term.

12. We will conduct all our economic policies cooperatively and responsibly with regard to the impact on other countries and will refrain from competitive devaluation of our currencies and promote a stable and well-functioning international monetary system. We will support, now and in the future, to candid, even-handed, and independent IMF surveillance of our economies and financial sectors, of the impact of our policies on others, and of risks facing the global economy.

Strengthening financial supervision and regulation:

13. Major failures in the financial sector and in financial regulation and supervision were fundamental causes of the crisis. Confidence will not be restored until we rebuild trust in our financial system. We will take action to build a stronger, more globally consistent, supervisory and regulatory framework for the future financial sector, which will support sustainable global growth and serve the needs of business and citizens.

14. We each agree to ensure our domestic regulatory systems are strong. But we also agree to establish the much greater consistency and systematic cooperation between countries, and the framework of internationally agreed high standards, that a global financial system requires.

Strengthened regulation and supervision must promote propriety, integrity and transparency; guard against risk across the financial system; must dampen rather than amplify the financial and economic cycle; reduce reliance on inappropriately risky sources of financing; and discourage excessive risk-taking. Regulators and supervisors must protect consumers and investors, support market discipline, avoid adverse impacts on other countries, reduce the scope for regulatory arbitrage, support competition and dynamism, and keep pace with innovation in the marketplace.

15. To this end we are implementing the Action Plan agreed at our last meeting, as set out in the attached progress report. We have today also issued a Declaration, Strengthening the Financial System. In particular we agree:

• To establish a new Financial Stability Board (FSB) with a strengthened mandate, as a successor to the Financial Stability Forum (FSF), including all G-20 countries, FSF members, Spain, and the European Commission;

• That the FSB should collaborate with the IMF to provide early warning of macroeconomic and financial risks and the actions needed to address them;

• To reshape our regulatory systems so that our authorities are able to identify and take account of macro-prudential risks;

• To extend regulation and oversight to all systemically important financial institutions, instruments and markets. This will include, for the first time, systemically important hedge funds;

• To endorse and implement the FSF’s tough new principles on pay and compensation and to support sustainable compensation schemes and the corporate social responsibility of all firms;

• To take action, once recovery is assured, to improve the quality, quantity, and international consistency of capital in the banking system. In future, regulation must prevent excessive leverage and require buffers of resources to be built up in good times;

• To take action against non-cooperative jurisdictions, including tax havens. We stand ready to deploy sanctions to protect our public finances and financial systems. The era of banking secrecy is over. We note that the OECD has today published a list of countries assessed by the Global Forum against the international standard for exchange of tax information;

• To call on the accounting standard setters to work urgently with supervisors and regulators to improve standards on valuation and provisioning and achieve a single set of high-quality global accounting standards; and:

• To extend regulatory oversight and registration to Credit Rating Agencies to ensure they meet the international code of good practice, particularly to prevent unacceptable conflicts of interest.

16. We instruct our Finance Ministers to complete the implementation of these decisions in line with the timetable set out in the Action Plan. We have requested the FSB and the IMF to monitor progress, working with the Financial Action Taskforce and other relevant bodies, and to provide a report to the next meeting of our Finance Ministers in Scotland in November.

Strengthening our global financial institutions :

17. Emerging markets and developing countries, which have been the engine of recent world growth, are also now facing challenges which are adding to the current downturn in the global economy. It is imperative for global confidence and economic recovery that capital continues to flow to them. This will require a substantial strengthening of the international financial institutions, particularly the IMF. We have therefore agreed today to make available an additional $850 billion of resources through the global financial institutions to support growth in emerging market and developing countries by helping to finance counter-cyclical spending, bank recapitalisation, infrastructure, trade finance, balance of payments support, debt rollover, and social support.

To this end:

• We have agreed to increase the resources available to the IMF through immediate financing from members of $250 billion, subsequently incorporated into an expanded and more flexible New Arrangements to Borrow, increased by up to $500 billion, and to consider market borrowing if necessary; and:

• We support a substantial increase in lending of at least 100 billion dollars by the Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs), including to low income countries, and [will] ensure that all MDBs have the appropriate capital [Text unclear here].

18. It is essential that these resources can be used effectively and flexibly to support growth. We welcome in this respect the progress made by the IMF with its new Flexible Credit Line (FCL) and its reformed lending and conditionality framework which will enable the IMF to ensure that its facilities address effectively the underlying causes of countries’ balance of payments financing needs, particularly the withdrawal of external capital flows to the banking and corporate sectors.

We support Mexico’s decision to seek an FCL arrangement.

19. We have agreed to support a general SDR allocation which will inject $250 billion into the world economy and increase global liquidity, and urgent ratification of the Fourth Amendment.

20. In order for our financial institutions to help manage the crisis and prevent future crises we must strengthen their longer term relevance, effectiveness and legitimacy. So alongside the significant increase in resources agreed today we are determined to reform and modernise the international financial institutions to ensure they can assist members and shareholders effectively in the new challenges they face. We will reform their mandates, scope and governance to reflect changes in the world economy and the new challenges of globalisation, and that emerging and developing economies, including the poorest, must have greater voice and representation. This must be accompanied by action to increase the credibility and accountability of the institutions through better strategic oversight and decision making.

To this end:

• We commit to implementing the package of IMF quota and voice reforms agreed in April 2008 and call on the IMF to complete the next review of quotas by January 2011;

• We agree that, alongside this, consideration should be given to greater involvement of the Fund’s Governors in providing strategic direction to the IMF and increasing its accountability;

• We commit to implementing the World Bank reforms agreed in October 2008. We further look forward to further recommendations, at the next meetings, on voice and representation reforms on an accelerated timescale, to be agreed by the 2010 Spring Meetings;

• We agree that the heads and senior leadership of the international financial institutions should be appointed through an open, transparent, and merit-based selection process; and:

• Building on the current reviews of the IMF and World Bank we asked the Chairman, working with the G-20 Finance Ministers, to consult widely in an inclusive process and report back to the next meeting with proposals for further reforms to improve responsiveness and adaptability of the IFIs.

21. In addition to reforming our international financial institutions for the new challenges of globalisation we agreed on the desirability of a new global consensus on the key values and principles that will promote sustainable economic activity. We support discussion on such a charter for sustainable economic activity with a view to further discussion at our next meeting.

We take note of the work started in other fora in this regard and look forward to further discussion of this charter for sustainable economic activity.

Resisting protectionism and promoting global trade and investment:

22. World trade growth has underpinned rising prosperity for half a century. But it is now falling for the first time in 25 years. Falling demand is exacerbated by growing protectionist pressures and a withdrawal of trade credit. Reinvigorating world trade and investment is essential for restoring global growth. We will not repeat the historic mistakes of protectionism of previous eras.

To this end:

• We reaffirm the commitment made in Washington: to refrain from raising new barriers to investment or to trade in goods and services, imposing new export restrictions, or implementing World Trade Organisation (WTO) inconsistent measures to stimulate exports. In addition we will rectify promptly any such measures. We extend this pledge to the end of 2010;

• We will minimise any negative impact on trade and investment of our domestic policy actions including fiscal policy and action in support of the financial sector. We will not retreat into financial protectionism, particularly measures that constrain worldwide capital flows, especially to developing countries;

• We will notify promptly the WTO of any such measures and we call on the WTO, together with other international bodies, within their respective mandates, to monitor and report publicly on our adherence to these undertakings on a quarterly basis;

• We will take, at the same time, whatever steps we can to promote and facilitate trade and investment; and:

• We will ensure availability of at least $250 billion over the next two years to support trade finance through our export credit and investment agencies and through the MDBs.

We ask our regulators to make use of available flexibility in capital requirements for trade finance.

23. We remain committed to reaching an ambitious and balanced conclusion to the Doha Development Round, which is urgently needed. This could boost the global economy by at least $150 billion per annum. To achieve this we are committed to building on the progress already made, including with regard to modalities.

24. We will give renewed focus and political attention to this critical issue in the coming period and will use our continuing work and all international meetings that are relevant to drive progress.

Ensuring a fair and sustainable recovery for all:

25. We are determined not only to restore economic growth but to lay the foundation for a fair and sustainable world economy. We recognise that the current crisis has a disproportionate impact on the vulnerable in the poorest countries and recognise our collective responsibility to mitigate the social impact of the crisis to minimise long-lasting damage to global potential.

To this end:

• We reaffirm our historic commitment to meeting the Millennium Development Goals and to achieving our respective ODA pledges, including commitments on Aid for Trade, debt relief, and the Gleneagles commitments, especially to sub-Saharan Africa;

• The actions and decisions we have taken today will provide $50 billion to support social protection, boost trade and safeguard development in low income countries, as part of the significant increase in crisis support for these and other developing countries/ emerging markets;

• We are making available resources for social protection for the poorest countries, including through investing in long-term food security and through voluntary bilateral contributions to the World Bank’s Vulnerability Framework, including the Infrastructure Crisis Facility, and the Rapid Social Response Fund;

• We have committed, consistently with the new income model, that additional resources from agreed sales of IMF gold will be used, together with surplus income, to provide $6 billion additional concessional and flexible finance for the poorest countries over the next 2 to 3 years. We call on the IMF to come forward with concrete proposals at the Spring Meetings;

• We have agreed to review the flexibility of the Debt Sustainability Framework and call on the IMF and World Bank to report to the IMFC and Development Committee at the Annual Meetings; and

• We call on the UN, working with other global institutions, to establish an effective mechanism to monitor the impact of the crisis on the poorest and most vulnerable.

26. We recognise the human dimension to the crisis. We commit to support those affected by the crisis by creating employment opportunities and through income support measures. We will build a fair and family-friendly labour market for both women and men.

We therefore welcome the reports of the London Jobs Conference and the Rome Social Summit and the key principles they proposed. We will support employment by stimulating growth, investing in education and training, and through active labour market policies, focusing on those who are most vulnerable. We call upon the ILO, working with other relevant organisations, to assess the actions taken and those required for the future.

27. We agreed to make the best possible use of investment funded by fiscal stimulus programmes towards the goal of building a resilient, sustainable, and green recovery.

We will make the transition towards clean, innovative, resource efficient, low carbon technologies and infrastructure. We encourage the MDBs to contribute fully to the achievement of this stated objective. We will identify and work together on further measures to build sustainable economies.

28. We reaffirm our commitment to address the threat of irreversible climate change, based on the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities, and to reach agreement at the UN Climate Change conference in Copenhagen in December 2009.

Delivering our commitments:

29. We have committed ourselves to work together with urgency and determination to translate these words into action. We agreed to meet again before the end of this year to review progress on our commitments (6).

(6) Tax Information Exchange Agreements (TIEAS) are based on a model OECD agreement on the exchange of information on tax matters, developed by the OECD Global Forum Working Group on Effective Exchange of Information. The purpose of this Agreement is to promote international co-operation in tax matters through the exchange of information. It was developed by the OECD’s Global Forum Working Group on Effective Exchange of Information (“the Working Group”). The Working Group consisted of representatives from OECD Member countries as well as delegates from Aruba, Bermuda, Bahrain, Cayman Islands, Cyprus, The Isle of Man, Malta, Mauritius, the Netherlands Antilles, the Seychelles and San Marino (the Italian mafia’s de facto jurisdiction).
The Agreement grew out of the work undertaken by the OECD to address harmful tax practices.

The lack of effective exchange of information is one of the primary criteria used in determining harmful tax practices. The mandate of the Working Group was to develop a legal instrument that could be used to establish effective exchange of information. The Agreement represents the standard of effective exchange of information for the purposes of the OECD’s initiative on harmful tax practices. This Agreement text, which was released by the OECD in April 2002, is not a binding instrument but contains two models for bilateral agreements. A number of bilateral agreements have been based on this Agreement.

Recent bilateral Tax Information Exchange Agreements (TIEAS) monitored by this service include:

• Antigua & Barbuda – Australia, 30 January 2007
• Antigua & Barbuda – United States, 06 December 2000
• Antigua & Barbuda – Australia, 30 January 2007
• Antigua & Barbuda – United States, 06 December 2000
• Aruba – United States, 21 November 2003
• Australia – Bermuda, 15 November 2005
• Australia – British Virgin Islands, 27 October 2008
• Australia – Isle of Man, 29 January 2009
• Australia – Netherlands Antilles, 01 March 2007
• Bahamas – United States, 25 January 2002
• Bermuda – United Kingdom, 4 December 2007
• British Virgin Islands – United States, 03 April 2002
• Cayman Islands – United States, 27 November 2001
• Denmark – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Denmark – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Denmark – Isle of Man, 30 October 2007
• Denmark – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• Faroes – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Faroes – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Faroes – Isle of Man, 30 October 2007
• Faroes – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• Finland – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Finland – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Finland – Isle of Man, 30 October 2007
• Finland – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• France – Guernsey, 24 March 2009
• France – Isle of Man, 26 March 2009
• France – Jersey, 23 March 2009
• Germany – Guernsey, 26 March 2009
• Germany – Isle of Man, 02 March 2009
• Greenland – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Greenland – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Greenland – Isle of Man, 30 October 2007
• Greenland – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• Guernsey – Netherlands, 25 April 2008
• Iceland – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Iceland – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Iceland – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• Ireland – Guernsey, 26 March 2009
• Ireland – Jersey, 26 March 2009
• Isle of Man – Ireland, 24 April 2008
• Isle of Man – Netherlands, 12 October 2005
• Isle of Man – Norway, 30 October 2007
• Isle of Man – Sweden, 30 October 2007
• Isle of Man – United Kindom, 29 September 2008
• Isle of Man – United States, 02 October 2002
• Jersey – Germany, 4 July 2008
• Jersey – Netherlands, 20 June 2007
• Jersey – United States, 04 November 2002
• Netherlands Antilles – New Zealand, 01 March 2007
• Netherlands Antilles – Spain, 10 June 2008
• Netherlands Antilles – United States, 17 April 2002
• Norway – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Norway – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Norway – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• Sweden – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Sweden – Guernsy, 28 October 2008
• Sweden – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• United Kingdom – British Virgin Islands, 29 October 2008
• United Kingdom – Guernsey, 20 January 2009
• United Kingdom – Jersey, 10 March 2009
• United States – Liechtenstein, 8 December 2008
• United States – Gibraltar, 31 March 2009


LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:


• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.


• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.


• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.


• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.


It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. Some versions have a ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s