Sunday 23 August 2009 02:00






That’s because Burma’s a key component in George H. W. Bush’s drug-related deception relative to the Golden Triangle, and nothing, but NOTHING, must EVER be allowed to destabilise that verily colossal dimension of the global crisis, must it? But when THAT explodes, as it WILL, we’ll know all about it, and the US perpetrators will indulge in a soul-wrenching whining for mercy. When THAT happens, NO MERCY MUST BE SHOWN TO THEM. THIS WARHEAD HAS YET TO DETONATE.

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!’

‘Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!’
Isaiah, Chapter 5, verses 20-21.

‘WE’LL KNOW OUR DISINFORMATION PROGRAM IS COMPLETE WHEN EVERYTHING THE AMERICAN PUBLIC BELIEVES IS FALSE’: William Casey, Director of Central Intelligence: An observation by the late Director at his first staff meeting in 1981. This observation reveals the mentality of cynicism which infests the US Federal control structures, and the reality that these structures regard the American people with total contempt. This attitude is the opposite to the noble concept of service to the American people which ought to inspire holders of public office, and therefore represents the epitome of decadence.

The evil spirit directing William Casey got the better of him when he committed suicide in hospital some years later, ostensibly to ‘protect the President’. The fantastic verbal fantasies perpetrated on certain US websites that are operating on the basis of Mr Casey’s principle, enunciated above, should therefore be handled with extreme care. Casey warned you!

‘Fret not thyself because of evil-doers, neither be thou envious against the workers of iniquity.
For they shall soon be cut down like the grass, and wither as the green herb’.
Psalm 37, verses 1 and 2.

‘The wicked plotteth against the just, and gnasheth upon him with his teeth. The Lord shall laugh at him: for he seeth that his day is coming. The wicked have drawn out the sword, and have bent their bow, to cast down the poor and needy, and to slay such as be of upright conversation. Their sword shall enter into their own heart, and their bows shall be broken’. Psalm 27, verses 12-15.

‘I have seen the wicked in great power, and spreading himself like a green bay tree. Yet he passed away, and lo, he was not; yea, I sought him, but he could not be found’. Psalm 37, verses 35-36.

‘The transgressors shall be destroyed together; the end of the wicked shall be cut off. But the salvation of the righteous is of the Lord; he is their strength in the time of trouble. And the Lord shall help them, and deliver them; he shall deliver them from the wicked, and save them, because they trust in Him’. Psalm 37, verses 38-40.



















• INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW: Volume 34, Numbers 3 & 4 was published on 14th August and was being mailed worldwide on Monday 17th August 2009. It contains our devastating blow-by-blow reporting of astonishing behind-the-scenes events tearing the lawless intergovernmental environment apart, where anything goes, assets are ‘diverted’, and no-one is responsible.

However, as a specific consequence of these exposures, the net is decisively closing in on ALL criminalist financial operators, both within notorious official structures and in the international financial community, as is becoming clearer by the day. This 592-page report on what has been happening behind the scenes is now being lodged in places ‘where it matters’ around the world, which means that it is impossible for a veil to be drawn over this financial criminality, EVER.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice are comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor’s study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing global financial corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Just press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

• The Editor’s $35,000 Wanta bail-out LOAN money plus interest has been stolen.

• See the second white panel for details of our latest distributed intelligence publications.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation, are appended at the foot of this report, below the legal data. See also our catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.


By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and our ‘politically incorrect’ intelligence books online from this website.


Judging by the furore that erupted behind the scenes following our report dated 17th August, the international community descended on the White House like a thunderbolt – forcing a hasty retreat from the diabolical sabotage devaluation scam that had been under consideration.

In other words, exposure of that intended global criminal putsch against the American people and the Rest of the World, consigned the swindle to the White House trash bins.

For, at 8.30pm on Thursday 20th August 2009, we were authoritatively informed that the massive US dollar devaluation operation had been cancelled. Apparently central banks, foreign governments, intelligence officials and international financial institutions and even the Israeli Government and the Vatican, with one accord, made it crystal clear, in language that even brainwashed White House intelligence operatives could easily comprehend, that the intended 60%-80% devaluation would be considered as an Act of Economic Warfare, and would be met with universal and uncompromisingly vigorous countermeasures. Any attempt to pay a debt in devalued trash represents, in both fact and law, a de facto repudiation of the debt, and also a default.

Had it not been for the fact that the criminal operatives have responded by seeking revenge by a means other than the drastic devaluation that they had in mind, we would by now be on the verge of developments which would have the potential for delivering the coup de grâce to the evil cabal of criminal US kleptocrats holding high office, past and present, and which will bring them lower than the communal drain into which they should have been thrust many years ago.

Moreover, in the process, a new, more stable and much less inflationary régime (over the longer term) would be brought into being. But this prospect, arising from the defeat of their devaluation swindle, has been placed ‘on hold’ until the newest scam developed by these unspeakable criminal operatives is blown out of the water.

So we have to STOP here and relate the latest scamming operation they have come up with. It took the criminal operatives at the highest level – Obama, his three predecessors, Mrs Clinton, Dr Ben Bernanke, Timothy Geithner, Rahm Emanuel and Larry Summers – a few days to recover from the body blow, and to decide how to take their revenge on the fact that their scheme to devalue the dollar by between 60% and 80% had been exposed and therefore ‘blown’.

At about 7.30pm, on 21st August, we learned what they had decided to do.

As they couldn’t get their own way by smashing up all the world’s furniture simultaneously while also enriching themselves in the process, they are reported to us to have been seeking to indicate their intention to revert to the ‘partial payment’ or ‘negotiated settlements’ scenario that we first exposed in our report dated 1st July 2009 [see Archive].

Although we would sympathise with anyone who suffers from EGO (Eyes Glaze Over) given the slithering of these venemous snakes, it may now be recalled that after ‘President’ Barack Hussein Obama PERSONALLY intervened at the end of May to sabotage the Settlements, the White House and the Geithner Treasury put it about that the payees are to accept ‘Structured Settlements’ on a ‘take it or leave it basis’. And as we also pointed out in the report on 1st July:

‘In translation, this means, ‘here, take this pittance and these IOUs which may promise payment in tranches over 30 years, and be grateful, and shut up’. What this means is as follows (in the context of the horrendous fact [see below] that Bush 41, Clinton 42, Bush 43 and Obama 44 managed to obtain renewed (in the case of 41-43) ‘immunity’ from the World Court on Thursday 20th August]:

• The Representatives of the British Monarchical Power and the Chinese are placing unwarranted trust and power in the hands of Stateside operatives WHO CANNOT BE TRUSTED.

• On the contrary, these people appear to have been DOING DEALS, rewriting the Pay Orders, and CHANGING THE PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS mandated by the injured parties [see (1) above]. [At least, that was the case until they were again caught out, on 21st August].

If we just ‘stay with this’ for a moment, this would imply inter alia that Leo E. Wanta may have been involved in some underhand arrangement to enable others to steal the money [BUT SEE BELOW]. FACT: Wanta accepted the Editor’s $35,000 two-year loan to get his probation reduced by five years and two weeks without having the resources to repay the loan and while indicating to the Editor that he would have the necessary funds available to remit on maturity – behaviour that falls under the heading of ‘Fraud in the Inducement’ [see at the foot of this report].

The objectives of any such illicit changes in the Basel-mandated Line Item payment requirements would include (a) ensuring payoffs to the corrupt US politicians; (b) ensuring that the Fraudulent Finance derivatives Ponzi operations stay in place, complete with off-balance sheet financing as though there had never been any discontinuity at all; (c) allowing the unreformed, unaudited and thoroughly corrupt Federal Reserve System, the cancer at the core of the crisis which ‘legitimises’ the endemic corruption of the big money center banks, to remain in control; and (d) PREVENTING THE LONDON DOLLAR REFUNDING OPERATION, for which arrangements have been in place since 29th May 2009, from materialising.

As previously explained, the London Dollar Refunding operation will take place transparently and above board, on the books, wholly in the private sector, with selected British and European-based institutions only (as no US financial institution can be trusted), delivering visible, cascading tax accruals both to the British and American Treasuries simultaneously. The tax payable to the US Treasury can be remitted via the British Treasury under the Bretton Woods arrangements.

Payments need to be paid so that those who will clean up this mess worldwide can get on with their appointed task. THREE YEARS HAVE BEEN WASTED. These payments MUST be made NOW.

Instead of which, the dim-witted official kleptomaniacs directing US financial policy are not only accumulating vast mountains of completely unnecessary debt in the background in exchange for the US Treasury’s avalanche of ‘Trashets’, but have discovered that, as we predicted in March, nobody is interested. Foreign purchases of this US trash are diminishing sharply.

Unsurprisingly, the Federal Reserve has been caught secretly buying up as much as nearly 50% of the ‘Trashets’ on offer at recent weekly Treasury auctions.

In other words, as the US analysts Chris Martenson and Jeff Nielson have recently pointed out, the authorities place their own agents at Treasury auctions, bidding on ‘own goods’ in order to drive up prices: ‘another example of the scam-mentality of the US Government – hardly a surprise, given the scam business models of their Wall Street masters’. These excellent analysts, who concur with our assessments, added, as Mr Nielson pointed out on 9th August:

‘The fact that the US Government needs to resort to such tactics is the clearest indication yet of how close the United States’ Ponzi-scheme economy is to total collapse’.

One reason that Dr Ben Bernanke is secretly buying up Geithner’s ‘Trashets’ is to disguise from the foreign creditors who (as Martenson and Neilson have noted) ‘hold a mortgage over the US economy’ in order to try to prevent them seeing demand for the US Treasury’s trash evaporating – which realisation would cause interest rates to soar, ‘followed shortly thereafter by a downgrade to the United States’ national credit rating, which still holds the same farcical ‘AAA’ rating as trillions of dollars of Wall Street scam-products’.

But a second reason for this desperate behaviour by the complacent Dr Bernanke is that he STILL sees the Fed taking over complete financial regulatory power, even though it is rank bust.

All of which condemns Bernanke, Geithner, Clinton, Summers, Obama and the rest to accusations of Terrorist Financing, since they have explicitly rejected the CORRECT, private sector-only Dollar Refunding Solution which is alone capable of generating the needed taxable, transparent, on-the-books trading profits – in favour of the reprobate and sterile deficit-financing orgy in which these doomed operatives are wilfully and, it seems, mischievously engaged – in order to hang onto direct control so as to satisfy the greed of the controlling Intelligence Power while helping themselves to corrupt pickings, which these criminals believe they have every right to do. .

• Recall: Government cannot tax itself: so its only financial product is DEBT. In sharp contrast, the private sector generates WEALTH which the Government sector can TAX to finance its operations and debt. THIS is the principle that the American (and British) authorities SHOULD have applied, and which, perversely, they explicitly rejected for greed and control reasons – a catastrophic error of judgment (to be charitable) that will cost both them and the whole world dear.

With reference to our ‘BUT SEE BELOW’ observation added under (3) above, we are advised on unquestionable authority that Leo Wanta is not a factor in the equation, as has indeed been the case for some time, and in fact has nothing whatsoever to do with any alleged illicit variations to the delayed payout arrangements. If this is true, then the foregoing brief summary can therefore most sensibly be interpreted as representing a ‘wedge’ stance which has been developed by the flailing criminalist operatives, as they thrash around trying to find a way out of their bind, instead of doing what they should be doing – resolving matters by ceasing to interfere with the Settlements.

They cannot bear the prospect of losing control of Fraudulent Finance and of the consequences for them all personally that will arise from a belated sensible decision on their part to cease and desist from their obstruction of justice, even though they will have to swallow the fact that the releases will, inter alia, facilitate the London-located private sector Dollar Refunding operation which will refloat the US dollar, whether it is a Treasury Dollar or a Federal Reserve Note (FRN), which, in turn, will restore the US and the British public finances within two years.

All of which now forces us to use language that we have so far felt more comfortable avoiding, and we do so almost as though we are having to draw attention to our ‘fiduciary duty’ in this matter:

• Advisers to and representatives of the British Monarchical Power had better seize control of this situation immediately in order to insist and procure that the Economic and Financial Warfare that these people are waging against Britain, China and THE REST OF THE WORLD, ceases forthwith.

• Should the Four Criminal Presidents – who demanded and obtained World Court ‘immunity’ last week [see exposure details below] – renege on their undertaking, given last Thursday, to cease impeding the releases in exchange for these World Court ‘immunities’, the Writ of Execution which we are informed stands ready to be applied, SHOULD BE ENFORCED IMMEDIATELY:

• Without in fact bothering to waste yet more time returning to the World Court to have the Four Criminal Presidents’ ‘immunities’ removed, although this can usefully be implemented later. Any hesitation on this score in the context of their failing to deliver, should be eschewed and the Writ of Execution’s powers should be implemented forthwith. NO FURTHER LEEWAY OR PREVARICATION BY THESE CROOKS SHOULD OR CAN BE TOLERATED. The world cannot bear or put up with it.

• The British Monarchical Power should understand that NO DEALS OR ACCOMMODATIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THESE U.S. CRIMINALS. They are no different from Lenin’s criminal comrades, and they behave in an identical manner.

Specifically, Lenin taught ‘the interested’ that it is legitimate to renege on all agreements with ‘the bourgeoisie’ whenever the correlation of forces favoured ‘the revolutionaries’. These people are much worse than Lenin and his associates: neither ‘President’ Obama, this veteran CIA operative who has travelled for years on four passports, nor ANY of his colleagues, can be trusted to honour ANY undertaking. There has been no such thing as the Full Faith and Credit of the United States since Paulson single-handedly destroyed it.

• Agreeing to the World Court’s immunities from prosecution for Bush 41, Clinton 42, Bush 43 and Obama 44, as revealed below, was a bad, debilitating error and should never have happened. It is not good enough to let these people off the hook repeatedly (as they see it: but again, see below).

• As suggested above, AFTER application of the Writ of Execution, not BEFORE, the Monarchical Power should indeed apply immediately to the World Court for renewed powers and the removal of the top criminalists’ bizarre sudden ‘immunity from prosecution’ because, from what we have been advised, these crooks were (as late as the final transatlantic conversation we held on 21st August, since AFTER which payment arrangements were again believed to have been ‘adjusted’) continuing to perpetrate Economic and Financial Terrorism against the United Kingdom, the British Crown, the Chinese, the American people and the Rest of the World, and were evidently encouraged because the self-discrediting World Court had allowed this latest insult to the Rule of Law to prevail.

• And let us be quite frank here: If the British Monarchical Power does not immediately assert its power to prevent these crooks getting their own way, the British Monarchy may not survive.

For make no mistake, this is OPEN WARFARE. If these US official criminals are allowed to get away with whatever scheme they may now pull which diverges in the slightest degree from the Basle-mandated requirements that were put in place earlier for the payments, the ‘whole of humanity’, to quote The Queen again, will suffer on an unimaginable scale.

Dr Ben Bernanke proclaimed on Friday 21st August that ‘the recession is over’. If that is the case, he needs to explain why it is that we are receiving anecdotal reports to the effect that supermarket shelves in some US areas are half empty, construction work across the nation has virtually ceased, cranes are idle, vast accumulations of containers lie empty at the docks, American manufacturing employment as a percentage of the total labour force has fallen below 9% (the lowest level ever recorded), rising job losses are worsening the United States’ spreading housing problems, the IMF is reporting that in many countries the potential exists for economies never to return to where they were prior to this criminal finance crisis being unmasked, and the only source of ‘reliable liquidity’ in the interbank market remains the proceeds of drug-trafficking (discussed below).

• Availability of funds: Informed sources advise us that Obama ‘couldn’t pay in January’ when he should have fulfilled the promises he gave internationally before becoming ‘President’ – because quote ‘there wasn’t enough money’ unquote. This issue has cropped up again, with the renewed bleating about ‘partial payment’. The underlying reality here is that vast sums have been illegally diverted, stolen, leveraged, hypothecated and otherwise exploited and alienated, with intermittent reports of monies being recovered and repatriated amid a welter of financial movements covered by ‘banking secrecy’, details of which are unknown outside the US Treasury, which is itself infested by duplicitous operatives. In the past, we have reported that Treasury Compliance Officers trying to do their jobs properly have even been threatened (under that criminal Paulson) with prosecution under the Patriot Acts if they did not cease and desist (from doing their jobs properly).

The fact that the Four Criminal Presidents have ‘needed’ to DEMAND (see below) ‘immunities from prosecution’ from the World Court proves that these despicable operatives know full well that they are criminals, otherwise they would not ‘need’ the ‘protection’ that is supposedly to be afforded by such ‘immunities’. Therefore, we are at complete liberty to refer to these highest-level operatives as criminals without fear of contradiction, as they themselves, by their actions, have confirmed that this is the case. By definition, they have of one accord condemned themselves.

In time of war, terrorists are rounded up and given the ultimate treatment. The Four US Presidents, and the leading figures in the Obama Administration, backed by the criminalised Intelligence Power which controls all branches of the US Federal Government, the dialectical Party Power and the US Military (which sits on its backside doing nothing while these crooks pirouette before them) are, so far as the Rest of the World is concerned, indistinguishable from common Terrorists.

Money laundering and fraudulent financial operations are terrorist crimes under the anti-terrorism legislation which the Bush White House sponsored. Such legislation has been adopted in Britain and Europe, and the British Government invoked the anti-terrorism legislation to freeze the assets of Icelandic institutions last year, proving that such legislation can indeed be deployed against the perpetrators of egregious financial crimes.

• These people are perpetrators of egregious financial crimes and are holding the whole world to ransom, on the assumption that no power on earth can stop them. It is OUR job to make sure that they ARE stopped – and that their aberrations are brought to AN ABRUPT, JUDDERING HALT

Having dealt immediately above with the ‘revenge’ scenario – ‘negotiated settlements’ contrary to the Basle-mandated Line Item payment requirements, a ruse aimed inter alia at ensuring that the criminalised US legislators (including Obama) get paid contrary to the instructions of the issuers of the Writ of Execution – we will now revert to the state of affairs that can be described if and when this latest storm passes because of this exposure, like the last.

The essence of the emerging environment will, as we have repeatedly intimated, be encapsulated in the phrase ‘source of funds’. If proceeds have not been earned legitimately, funds will not be credited and investigations, likely followed by criminal proceedings, will ensue across the board. Cheques issued by offshore banks, will bounce. Funds transferred by them will not be accepted in the metropolitan centres without satisfactory explanations as to ‘source of funds’.

High-up criminals may only very recently have begun to understand the message delivered by the Judge in the main Madoff case, who handed down the maximum tariff, and is poised to repeat this exercise when Madoff’s former Chief Financial Officer, Frank DiPascali, is sentenced after pleading guilty in the second week in August to multiple financial crimes arising from his aiding and abetting of Bernard Madoff’s Ponzi operations, with the likelihood that he, too, will receive the maximum tariff – in his case, 125 years in jail. The Judge sent DiPascali straight to jail anyway, refusing him bail, despite his confession that he and others used historical data from the Internet and a random-number generator to generate bogus Madoff account statements for clients. “It was all fake. It was all fictitious, It was wrong , and I knew it was wrong”, DiPascali asserted in the seven-page plea agreement presented before the Court.

These court developments, the dark clouds surrounding the jailed Bush Sr. associate ‘Sir’ Alan Stanford and his colleagues, the 20+-year terms facing Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin, senior Bear Stearns Asset Management personnel arrested for wire and securities fraud (a case coming to court in October), the new-found aggressiveness against wealthy US tax evaders that is now being displayed (disgracefully late in the day) by the Internal Revenue Service in the UBS scandal, and the case of the ex-Crédit Suisse brokers Eric Butler and Julian Tzolov for securities fraud (and in Tzolov’s case, jumping bail), send further signals to the criminal oligarchs that their game is up.

Time has indeed long been called on their endless free-wheeling bonanza orgy at the expense of others; and to suggest that, whatever last-minute wriggles over the releases they perform, their future prospects are bleak in the extreme, would be a foolish understatement. It’s ‘maximum tariff time’ for ALL CONCERNED, and Tzolov, for instance, faces 185 years in prison.

Following the latest version of the US Government’s agreement with UBS, under which Switzerland agreed to reveal the names of 4,450 wealthy Americans holding offshore accounts at UBS, Douglas Shulman, the IRS Commissioner, asserted that ‘this agreement sends an unmistakable message to people hiding income and assets offshore. The IRS will vigorously pursue tax cheats around the world’, and will obviously now turn its attention to other foreign banks which have been offering US taxpayers comparable ‘services’. A week prior to the US-Swiss accord, Liechtenstein agreed to a parallel anti-tax evasion accord with the British authorities.

Now as everyone who is not sitting on their brains is thinking, when are we going to learn that the criminal Godfathers – the holders of the highest offices who have abused their tenures on a scale with no historical precedent and who have all just openly admitted, with one accord, that they are criminals by their action in DEMANDING ‘immunity’ – are likewise going to be hauled before the US courts, to be advised that they, too, will be made to suffer the consequences of their serial crimes, receiving ‘maximum tariff’ sentences, after the manner of their equally despicable lesser comrades who ransacked the wealth of targeted investors on the assumption that because people at the top were ‘doing it’, they were protected as well?

• And the protection upon which they and the highest-level kleptocrats relied, of course, was the still unreformed ‘criminals’ charter’ known as the National Security Act et seq., which the cynical criminalised elements of the US intelligence community exploited ruthlessly while making sure to confuse the ‘national interest’ with their own personal self-interest and greed.

For, equipped with their Reagan Executive Order 12333 ‘intelligence corporations’, of which they owned the shares in their personal capacity, greedy US operatives fanned out across the globe, expanding the ‘opportunities’ opened up by their pillaging of the Soviet Union authorised under President Reagan [see report dated 28th July], whose corruption can certainly be compared with those of his four successors – and visiting innumerable other countries with their seedy deals.

In other words, the ransacking of the Soviet Union set a precedent for the pillaging of many other countries – including, inevitably, as the Soviets themselves ensured, the United States itself – and procured the dissemination of US organised Fraudulent Finance and Ponzi techniques all over the world, corrupting central banks and governments everywhere.

But with the extraordinary success of these exposures, expectations have been raised that it is high time (in fact it is way beyond time) that the highest-level criminals are brought to justice, and are seen to be suffering the consequences of their fraudulent activities, just like their lesser minions. People are becoming understandably ‘beyond impatient’ for this to occur.

And so, what did we learn on 20th August 2009?

We were informed by impeccable sources (several) that ‘President’ Barack Hussein Obama was, after a great deal of transatlantic paper-shuffling, granted ‘immunity from prosecution’ by the World Court effective Tuesday 18th August., a FACT which, as mentioned above, naturally presupposes that ‘President’ Obama KNOWS THAT HE IS A CRIMINAL: otherwise he wouldn’t have ‘needed’ to apply for ‘immunity from prosecution’, would he?

At about 4:00pm UK time on Saturday 22nd August, the Editor was authoritatively informed that all FOUR Presidents – George H. W. Bush Sr. (41), his colleague William Jefferson Rockefeller-Clinton (42), George W. Bush Jr. (43) AND Barack Hussein Obama (44), collectively DEMANDED ‘immunity’ from the World Court IN EXCHANGE FOR THEM ALLOWING THE RELEASES TO PROCEED, and that this ‘immunity from prosecution’ was granted by the World Court on Thursday 20th August.

• It has not been explained to us why ‘President’ Obama needed to reinforce the ‘immunity from prosecution’ that he was reported to have been granted on Tuesday 18th August.

Ipso facto, therefore, ALL FOUR U.S. PRESIDENTS have acknowledged that they are criminals, which itself begs a large number of questions about their futures given the innumerable felonies that these criminal operatives have committed.

Moreover their joint DEMAND for ‘immunity’ represented the exercise of DURESS against the World Court, representing the international community, the Crown and the Chinese parties – which means that, especially if they renege on their latest undertaking now, they can expect no further leeway or accommodation from ANY aggrieved party whatsoever, even, we believe, from their own military which has quite disgracefully remained complacently on the sidelines, after successive Provosts Marshal botched the execution of their responsibilities.

Now before you all shriek, as you might understandably do, that ‘we have been here before, for heaven’s sake’, observe the following:

• All our sources were unanimous in ADDING that the big powers involved (Britain, meaning the Monarchical Power, Russia and China) had indicated that they would now have ‘no objection’, for the immediate practical purposes of procuring the releases, to such ‘immunity’ being granted, because (spoken or unspoken) all four of these now self-admitted despicable criminal financial terrorists ‘will be going to jail anyway’ [see below].

• ‘President’ Barack Hussein Obama is INCLUDED in the Group of Four Top Criminal operatives who have been granted ‘immunity’ (in his case, TWICE).

• As noted earlier, to seek immunity from prosecution implies that the individual looking for it is aware that he or she is in danger of prosecution for criminal activity, which is another way of saying that the applicant knows that they have a problem, i.e. are guilty of criminal behaviour. Therefore, Obama knows that he is a criminal operative, like his three predecessors – all of whom considered that, yet again, they needed the protection of World Court immunity, which had been stripped from them earlier. Obviously, these ‘immunities’ are strictly conditional upon performance, and this time, we do not expect that the crooks will have any rope left which would enable them to escape the consequences of any renewed failure to procure the releases.

Now, self-evidently, since World Court decisions and even the existence of its hearings are closely held intergovernmental secrets, we do not know (yet, at any rate) what any other quid pro quo for this belated ‘granting of immunity from prosecution’ may really have been.

All we know is that because crimes were committed abroad and against foreign parties, especially against the British Monarchical Power and the Chinese parties (which is by no means to downplay the pillaging of American investors who were enticed into the perpetrators’ organised criminalist Ponzi schemes), the World Court has jurisdiction to remove or impose ‘immunity from prosecution’ at will if it so chooses – implying the certainty that if these crooks ‘fail to deliver’, their immunities will immediately be revoked.

We can further deduce from all this that the Big Four World-Class Presidential Criminals, including the current ‘President’ of the United States who obviously feels the necessity for such ‘protection’, attach singular IMPORTANCE to such World Court ‘immunity’ and would therefore, conversely, be aggrieved and concerned should the ‘immunities’ be withdrawn in the event of their continuing with their routine obstructions of justice. After all, they DEMANDED their ‘immunities’.

• If you DEMAND something (not subject to negotiation) you REALLY NEED IT.

On the other hand, as this Editor mentioned to a US source, the criminal mentality would be more than likely to react to such a concession with an attitude of: ‘See what happens when we dig our heels in? We get our own way’. Which could mean that they may STILL be foolishly tempted, even now, to revert to corrupt ‘business as usual’ (having chosen not to understand the ‘maximum tariff’ message outlined above): see above for details.

Our own view is that it is beyond a disgrace that the World Court sees fit to play fast and loose with the crimes of highly-placed persons, handing down judgments which are contradicted later with this deplorable ‘immunity from prosecution’ device.

For this confirms that, as we have maintained all along:

• In the intergovernmental sector, anything goes, assets are ‘diverted’ and stolen, deception prevails, and no-one is responsible.

• The World Court is itself corrupt, cannot be relied upon to sustain a stance based upon the Rule of Law, and is allowing the depredations of these criminals to degrade its standing and to parade the evident reality that, in the intergovernmental sector, the Rule of Law can be variable, does not automatically apply, or both of the above.

Given the huge power of this website as a consequence of these exposures, it is just possible that greater knowledge of this scandalous state of affairs may goad the World Court into cleaning up its own act – something that it would be well advised to do, considering the mass anger surrounding the financial terrorism atrocities perpetrated by these criminals, whom the World Court sees fit to let off the hook with such apparent disdain for the Rule of Law.

The World Court is hardly an appropriate forum for such truly disgraceful inconsistencies. Either it applies the Rule of Law, or it should be closed down as not fit for purpose.

It may be argued that without the World Court, the convenient (for the criminals) chaos that reigns at the intergovernmental level would be worse. However logic dictates that any such argument consumes itself, since the World Court has demonstrated that it cannot be relied upon, from one day to the next, to maintain a consistent course. A crime that is adjudged to be a crime on Monday remains a crime on the following Thursday.

However the World Court appears to take the view that the consequences for perpetrators of the crime that was considered a crime on Monday, can be varied later in the week.

• This is unconscionable humbug.

Reverting to the ‘pragmatic’ responses of the main powers involved in pressing for matters to be regularised, we understand that these powers ‘authorised’ the World Court to ‘grant immunities’ to the Big Four perpetrators, on the spoken or unspoken basis that, as indicated, ‘it is neither here nor there, because they’re all going to jail anyway’. In this connection, there are now persistent reports that the Big Four and their most notorious associates WILL INDEED find themselves at the receiving end of the harsh whip of justice, given the deliberations of the National Security Grand Juries and the insistence of external powers (especially, we understand, the British Monarchical Power’s representatives) that none of these criminals should be allowed to walk away unscathed.

• But so far, that’s what’s happening: AND IT STINKS.

In this connection, certain nefarious developments following our report here dated 17th August, reportedly involving Leo Wanta, Tom Melville and Senator Schumer, together with other first-hand indications that we have received, reinforce our belief that the corrupt politicians are not going to be remunerated for their corruption, contrary to their expectations – prompting a scramble for last-minute Pay Orders, and an extraordinary attempt to ‘sting’ Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., which failed – greatly exacerbating the ‘plight’ facing the kleptocrats in the Legislative Branch, which in this context, includes former Senator Barack Obama.

• These people were not going to be paid, and they were furious. At least one attempted bribe of a senior politician to get him to intervene, has failed.

And at the same time, the jockeying for corrupt pay-offs that has been going on, seems to be the primary factor underlying the prevarications which have bedevilled the Settlements throughout 2009, especially most recently. This is exceptionally significant, because these selfish operatives and others have been wilfully holding the United States, the American people and the Rest of the World to ransom while they scrabble to try to procure payoffs for themselves, in the face of their belated realisation that they aren’t on the pay list – and to hell with everyone else.

• Hell is, however, where these people are destined to wind up.

For not the least of their problems will be the fact that any ‘deals’ that they may have tried to pull behind the scenes represent EXTORTION and attempts to obtain pecuniary reward by deception, placing each and every one of those involved in the law enforcement firing line. Since Leo Wanta has not been paid, he is in any case in no position to give any Pay Order undertakings: vide ‘Fraud in the Inducement’ – the crime that he committed when signing massive known Pay Orders, and when borrowing $35,000 from the Editor of this service for a two-year term at 7%, with which his probation was shortened by five years and two weeks [see report dated 6th August 2007, on the Wisconsin Tax Gestapo sequence].

In parallel with evidence that the scalded rats are jockeying for belated Pay Orders after the stable door has been slammed shut in their faces, are indications that the notorious Mrs Queen Melusina, codename for Mrs Hillary Rodomski Clinton, the US Secretary of State, has ‘rolled over’ not just on her former Bushite associates in crime, but on others as well, including prominent legislators.

Like the discredited former British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, recall, back in the final quarter of last year, ‘rolling over’ came naturally to this duplicitous, two-faced, principle-free deception artiste – a point that the stupid CIA operatives who recruited her in the first place should have anticipated. Taking risks with an individual as slippery as this Jezebel was little short of demented.

Quite apart from any other consideration, she’s rather stupid. Any operative who, at this late stage of the exposure process, imagines that it is safe to walk into a bank in Baghdad to try to pull the stolen Katrina money, risking obvious chances of having her right shoulder weighed down by the heavy, clammy hand of a Gold Badge despatched to the institution specially for the purpose, has allowed her arrogance to blind her to reality – a familiar failing among these highest-level CIA crooks who imagined that they would always be ‘covered’ by the 1947 National Security Act et seq.

But she’s not so stupid as to waste time defending the crooks with whom she has been associated all her working life – choosing instead to ‘cooperate’, in the hope that any ‘transactional’ immunity from prosecution will be sustainable. The way things are going, that seems most unlikely. People are suddenly disappearing, and we have had at least one report to the effect that (quote) ‘things are getting bloody’. However during the week ending on 21st August 2009, the Clintons surfaced in Bermuda, supposedly for a ‘short break’ – only to leave in a hurry on Thursday 20th at the approach of the appropriately named Hurricane Bill. We are supposed to believe that they ignored the earlier hurricane warnings before travelling to that lovely tax haven, which they appear to have ‘needed’ to do, all of a sudden, in a hurry.

This visit is especially interesting because, as indicated above, all Four of the Criminal Presidents DEMANDED World Court ‘immunity from prosecution’ in unison on Thursday 20th August. Far from leaving Bermuda in a hurry because of the approach of Hurricane Bill, therefore, the likelihood is that they may have feared that the demanded ‘immunity’ might not eventuate, so that they might be arrested on British territory. Which further suggests to us that they HAD to appear JOINTLY at a bank in Bermuda in order to untangle some banking matter held in their joint names, and that they took a calculated risk that the British authorities would not get their act together and arrest them ahead of the World Court’s demanded ‘immunity’ being granted.

There have also been indications, too, of domestic funds being siphoned away from their intended purposes, in order, it is suspected by qualified observers, to compensate the super-corrupt US politicians for the reality that, on the insistence of the foreign injured parties who are supposed to be in the driving seat, none of these people are to be paid a cent. In this sordid connection, two disturbing developments stand out as the White House scrapes the bottom of the barrel to siphon out funds in order to finance corrupt payoffs to cronies in the Legislative Branch:

• THE ‘CASH FOR CLUNKERS’ SWINDLE: In Britain, this operation is referred to as ‘the Scrappage Scheme’, and according to recent reports, it has operated successfully, raising the level of new car sales with old cars taken in part exchange, although the bureaucratic paperwork faced by UK car dealers is burdensome. As a market intervention mechanism with practical outcomes (greater road safety, increased sales of new cars), it makes sense – except that, given the de-industrialisation of Britain due to its catastrophic participation in the German-controlled European Union Collective, the new cars are almost all imported from Germany: so the clear downside is that ‘scrappage’ has interfered with the improvement in Britain’s debilitated balance-of-payments that should rightly be associated with a domestic slump. But at least there has (so far) been no whiff of scandal.

• Unlike the parallel ‘Cash for Clunkers’ scheme in the United States, under which bureaucratic scheme automotive dealers have experienced a mini-boom in auto sales and have transacted hundreds of thousands of deals on the same ‘scrappage’ basis, whereby the dealer supposedly receives $4,000-$5,000 for each old vehicle traded for a new one.

On 20th August, the US Transportation Secretary, Ray LaHood, announced that the popular scheme will be abruptly terminated on Monday 24th August because, according to The Washington Post, the $3.0 billion allocated for the program has ‘been depleted’.

However no-one seems to know why the ‘Cash for Clunkers’ scheme has been depleted, because the automotive dealers, who are owed millions of dollars, haven’t received a single red cent.

None of the money has been paid to them. For each deal, they are required to fill in an enormous document, and there have been anecdotal reports of these documents being repeatedly rejected because of some error or other – the covert purpose of the documents being to preclude payment from the scheme to dealers altogether.

So it looks suspiciously as though the ‘depletion’ of the $3.0 billion scheme is attributable to the fact that the money, like the Katrina funds, has been STOLEN – to finance, we are advised, payouts to corrupt politicians inside the Washington Beltway.

Under a US Department of Health and Human Services decision specifically ORDERED by the Obama White House, the Federal Government has indicated that it will not be paying for such needs as the placement of unwanted or abused children in temporary accommodation (i.e., it will not now finance orphanages, specifically, we are given to understand, within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania). Instead, it is requiring that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s counties (which we know about: whether this applies in other States, we are not sure) to make due provision, out of thin air, for the necessary funding (going back to at least 2008).

• The money which SHOULD be available is reported to have ‘gone missing’: another instance of domestic funds being diverted, we are specifically informed, to finance corrupt crony payoffs.

•This will force counties to curtail or cancel contracts with providers in this field and will have the effect of children roaming the streets of some cities, as in Brazil.

Consider, therefore, the depths of the grotesque deceit surrounding a recent staged photograph of ‘President’ Obama greeting small children. Quite seriously, our responsible sources are actually telling us that this represents another ‘scraping the bottom of the barrel’ scam, as the perpetrators scour the system for cash that can be STOLEN to pay off their cronies and themselves.

The very next morning after the Editor had discussed this swindle on the transatlantic telephone line, an explosion shook the Department of Health and Human Services building in Washington. Ostensibly, a ‘transformer exploded at about 9:45 am’ in what was described as the Department’s penthouse electrical room. But ‘There was no smoke or fire’, according to a spokesman cited by The Washington Post. A DC Fire official said: ‘As a precaution, we have cleared the building of about 300 occupants, and right now we continue to evaluate the building’s electrical system’.

After a 40-minute evacuation, employees returned to the building, and the electrical systems were declared to be operational. The blast occurred at around the same time in the morning as earlier, similar, explosions inside the Beltway, implying that any sabotage had been perpetrated overnight.

Unsurprisingly, the official explanations for this episode are believed to be diversionary. We are authoritatively advised that because we discussed the aforementioned DHSS swindle on the open transatlantic phone line, someone panicked and created this diversion to cover up evidence of the swindle before it exploded in the face of this duplicitous White House.

This episode is reminiscent, is it not, of earlier ‘explosions’ in DC buildings that we have reported, suspected of having been orchestrated by the Cheney Gang.


Internationally, three contemporary developments appear to be related to this crisis:

The continued Afghanistan scandal: As reiterated in this space, the British Ministry of Defence had better things to do than to bother answering our open letter posted here over a year ago, in which we pointed out that we urgently needed a precise explanation of what we are doing in Afghanistan. We elaborated that if this was not forthcoming we would have to conclude that suspicions that we are operating there in order to seize and maintain control over the heroin trade, in conjunction with the criminal Americans so as to control it, are accurate.

Rather than lie to us, the Ministry of Defence chose to ignore our letter completely – a foolish and arrogant decision on their part, since this question is now, as mentioned in the preceding report, the primary issue to which the UK media are repeatedly returning. Following an issue of The Daily Telegraph which consisted of nothing but pictures of most of the 204 British troops who have died in Afghanistan and from their wounds there, further reports appeared showing disconsolate small children and war widows and relatives weeping over the coffins of British troops who have died in this war. If the wounded are included, over 1,000 families are now affected by this scandal.

Recently, a BBC programme interviewed British troops in Afghanistan. The interviewer repeatedly asked the troops the straightforward question: ‘What are you doing here?’ The soldiers answered (correctly): ‘We don’t ask questions. We just carry out orders’. The significance of this is that the BBC, which usually neglects the real issues in favour of its own statist and socialist agenda, is asking OUR question.

No-one ever receives a coherent answer to it. It would be simplicity itself for the UK Ministry of Defence to publish a succinct explanation of the purposes of British participation in this diabolical operation. When the Editor phoned the MOD in 2008, he was pushed around from official to official, until some female offered the explanation that we are in Afghanistan in pursuit of international objectives, and would I like to talk to the Foreign Office?

• Since the Foreign Office has consistently betrayed British interests ever since the Editor was born, and long before that, we did not take up that kind offer.

In January 2009, the head of UNODC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime), Signor Antonio Maria Costa, gave an interview in the Austrian journal Profil, to which we have referred on several prior occasions. In that key interview, Antonio Costa specifically confirmed that the ONLY liquidity available in the interbank market in the second half of 2008 (meaning, we think, from around mid-September onwards) was derived from the proceeds of drug-trafficking.

• This appears to have been the first acknowledgement by an international or national official of the intimate connection between the failing international financial system and drug-trafficking, which of course is a crime against humanity.

For this reason, we consider Sig. Costa’s observation to be the most important indicator of reality EVER to have emerged from the bowels of the usually complacent and self-interested international and national official communities – because it illuminates the criminalised (drug-related) financial dimension underlying global relations, the financial crisis itself, and specific intractable trouble spots, such as Afghanistan and:

All of a sudden, we are informed that the Obama Administration is ‘reviewing’ US policy towards Burma, which has been shut off from the Rest of the World for decades, like Cuba, formerly Iraq, Syria, Libya and Vietnam, and North Korea. With the exception of Cuba, these pariah régimes were deliberately ‘bottled up’ so that their mineral resources could not be exploited to any meaningful extent, sustaining false pricing, until it suited the interests of the drug and oil controllers to do so.

And now, all of a sudden, Burma is above the radar. Specifically, Senator Jim Webb of Virginia (an operative, of course), procured, on Sunday 16th August, the release of an incarcerated and ailing American, Jim Yettaw, who had been sentenced to seven years’ hard labour in Burma.

Senator Jim Webb is Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s East Asia and Pacific Affairs Subcommittee. The Senator dropped in on Rangoon on a flight from Bangkok on the Sunday, picked up the American, and returned to Washington, indicating that the handover had been pre-agreed. The 55-year-old Mr Yettaw, who supposedly has ‘serious health problems’, had been held in Insein Prison in Rangoon (Yangon) since his arrest in May 2009.

The American had been arrested as he swam away from the lakeside ‘safe house’ residence of the detained Burmese Opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, where he had sheltered for two days after sneaking in uninvited. He was convicted during the week preceding Senator Jim Webb’s arrival for breaking the terms of Suu Kyi’s house arrest and related charges, and sentenced as indicated to seven years’ in prison with hard labour. Suu Kyi, who has been detained for 14 of the past 20 years, was herself sentenced to three years in prison for violating her house arrest conditions following this episode, although her new sentence was reduced to 18 months’ under house arrest by order of the head of the Burmese Junta, Senor General Than Shwe.

‘President’ Obama signalled in his Inauguration speech that his Administration would be prepared to ‘engage’ with any (pariah) Government that showed willingness to reciprocate; and in February, Mrs Melusina Clinton, in a trip through Asia, made some pointed remarks about the failure of US and international policies to influence Burmese official behaviour; and the ‘received’ view is that this is because ‘Burma is protected by China’.

But the real reason is that Burma is at the apex of the notorious ‘Golden Triangle’ and is financed by the proceeds of illicit drug-trafficking operations. If our necessary conclusion (for want of the requested official explanation) is correct – that we are in Afghanistan to help the corrupt Americans control and exploit the heroin business, the proceeds of which are used to lubricate the interbank market – and if it is indeed the case that the Afghanistan operation has gone horribly wrong (as all foreigners intermeddling in this place learn to their detriment, except that the present bunch are purposely ignorant of history, which they despise) – it would follow that Burma is being ‘softened up’ for rehabilitation, with the same underlying criminal objective in mind.

• The 18 months of Suu Kyi’s house arrest is just about the length of time that might be needed for Burma’s intended ‘rehabilitation’ to mature, although it will also cover the period of the ‘General Election’, removing the opposition leader from platforms. But the central issue is: Drug money is just about the only ‘reliable’ open-ended source of liquidity left in the interbank market.

And according to a Washington Post-ABC News poll reported on 19th August 2009, a majority of Americans consider the war in Afghanistan as not worth fighting for, while barely 25% say that more US troops should be sent there. Opinion polls are the means used by ‘the controllers’ to determine how far they can push unpopular policies. They now have their answer.

Hence Burma.

ADDENDUM: THERE ARE MORE THAN A DOZEN LIVE AMERICAN POWs HELD IN BURMA. One of these is Daniel Hubbs, US Navy. The living Prisoners of War were provided to Burma by Laos for contract slave labour to work on certain road projects. Specifically, the latest bridge project located in the Saiyabori Louang Namtha area in Laos links with the Burma road projects which connect up with the northern end of the new bridge, which has also been constructed by the same slave labour group using American Prisoners of War.

However Senator Jim Webb didn’t, apparently, see any need to rescue these ageing US POWs who have been ruthlessly abused as slave labour in conformity with the gigantic drug-related deception perpetrated by Godfather George H. W. Bush whereby US and other former military are held in the region illegally decades after the ending of hostilities.

• This dimension of the global financial-drug criminalism crisis has yet to explode in the faces of these criminals; and it will. When it does, we will observe what happens during exorcism, which is not elaborated upon in the segment on exorcism below. During that procedure, three phases are usually observed: first, a prolonged and ominous silence; next, the terrorising; and finally, the most soul-wrenching whining for mercy. The DEMAND by the Four Criminal Presidents that we cite in this report straddled, it seems, the second and third phases of the ‘exorcism’.

• We can expect to hear a great deal more soul-wrenching whining for mercy, not least when the POW scandal explodes. It has the potential to bring down governments, starting in Washington.

In a sequence of grim events which continues the strand of international tension surrounding the bombing of Pan-Am 107 that crashed over Lockerbie, Scotland, in 1988, the Scottish Administration, which under the devolution arrangements reached in 1999, is in charge of prisoners in Scotland, released Abdenbaset Ali Mohamed al Megrahi, from long-term jail on 20th August.

The reason given for the release by Kenny MacAskill, the Scottish Justice Minister in the Scottish Nationalist Government who himself has a murky past, was ‘mercy’ and ‘humanity’ in the face of the Libyan’s fatal prostate cancer and the fact that he is supposed to have only three months to live. If the only man to have been convicted for the Lockerbie atrocity is ill, this did NOT appear to be the case from the close-up photographs of his half-covered face as he walked unaided up the steps to his Libyan plane at Glasgow Airport.

This episode has to be read upside down. First, dealing with the Scottish Minister’s own agenda, the decision showed that Scotland can take decisions with major international consequences in the teeth of American opposition (after a sharp phone call from Queen Melusina herself, no less).

Thus the devolved Scottish Nationalist Administration contrived to propel itself abruptly onto the international stage, causing satisfaction among the Nationalists and discomfort everywhere else.

More to the point, the Scottish Minister sidestepped the possibility that al Megrahi’s conviction could have been overturned on appeal, which the Libyan suddenly dropped on the preceding Friday. Mr MacAskill stated that ‘I can only base my decision on the medical advice I have before me’, adding that the decision had been taken for reasons of mercy and compassion ‘and for these reasons alone’. But, as the perceptive Daily Telegraph analyst, David Blair (no relation) pointed out:

‘If so, why did the Libyan suddenly drop his appeal last Friday? Why did his lawyers then go to court and win judicial approval for this decision (to release him) on Tuesday? If Mr Megrahi’s plight as a prisoner struck down by terminal illness was the only factor in Mr MacAskill’s mind, these moves would have been unnecessary’.

‘Once the doctors had reported on the severity of Mr Megrahi’s prostate cancer, he could have expected to go free on the strength of the mercy and compassion which Mr McAskill has hailed as the ‘defining characteristic of Scotland and the Scottish people’. Once back in Libya, Megrahi could have sought to clear his name by persisting with his appeal’.

‘Instead, the evidence suggests that an implicit deal was struck. Mr Megrahi won his freedom, in return for dropping the proceedings that could have been highly damaging for the reputation of Scottish Justice. So Mr MacAskill, a lawyer, has saved his legal system from embarrassment while placing Scotland’s Government on the world stage. He has also thumbed his nose at Washington’ which, nowadays, nobody cares much about. And ‘with admirable skill, he has taken the decision that yields the maximum political gain’.

But while that ‘takes care’ of the Scottish dimension, the deeper implications here are not hard to discern. First, as The Daily Telegraph’s analyst pointed out, ‘one important voice in this saga has been strangely silent. Despite Megrahi’s fate having significant implications for relations between Britain and Libya, London has had nothing to say’.

But in November 2008, Britain and Libya concluded a ‘Prisoner Transfer Agreement’ which, of course, was agreed with this particular transfer in mind. Libya nowadays is the location, too, of British Petroleum’s largest exploration project. And since Britain is supposed to be the United States’ ‘closest ally’, the White House, like a really good friend, should be happy for the United Kingdom that things are working out so awfully nicely.

But The Daily Telegraph’s front page headline on 21st August read: ‘Obama’s fury as Lockerbie bomber flies home to Libya’, as the President ‘led growing international condemnation’ of the Scottish Administration’s decision, which had in fact been facilitated by London last November via the foregoing bilateral agreement.

Since we know, from our experience in watching ‘President’ Obama ignoring and riding roughshod over the interests of the American people in pursuit of a truly perverse Terrorist Deficit Financing agenda including self-enrichment, that the occupant of this White House is no more interested in the problems facing Americans than his three notorious self-interested predecessors, the alibi that Obama was speaking on behalf of the grieving and bereaved families of the victims of that atrocity, carries no conviction. So why, then, was Obama described as being ‘furious’?

Here’s why. The Scottish Judicial system was indeed likely to declare that the conviction of the Libyan intelligence operative was unsafe. So he would have been released by the court. And why was it unsafe? Because, as we separately exposed in our Arab-Asian Affairs report several years ago, the Libyan Government was made the ‘fall-guy’ for a crime that it did not sponsor – a reality that emerged when Mr Tony Blair’s ‘diplomacy’ resulted in the sudden rehabilitation of Libya in exchange for a (false) Libyan admission of guilt and Libya purportedly abandoning its quest for weapons of mass destruction, which was accompanied by Libyan comments that the admission of guilt had been agreed for pragmatic purposes only, i.e. ‘under duress’.

• FACT: The Libyan leadership took the pragmatic decision that it would put up with the cynical Western stipulation that it should accept guilt for the atrocity that it did not commit (in order to assist the Americans with their Bush-linked cover-up imperative), on the principle that ‘we are hideously unpopular anyway, so admitting responsibility makes no difference’.

• FACTS: Pan-Am 107 routinely transported drugs sourced from the Beka’a Valley in Lebanon, to the United States. The drugs were transferred to the aircraft daily at Frankfurt Airport. This drug-trafficking operation, handled by controlled cells associated with Palestinian groups, was reported to have had links with the Bush Crime Syndicate.

The release of Mr al-Megrahi leaves the matter of Libyan involvement up in the air but at the same time removes the protective blanket that exploited Libya as cover for the real perpetrators of that atrocity, which reflected a dispute for control over this source of illicit drugs (needed to finance the interbank market, as discussed above).

Therefore, Obama’s ‘fury’, given that he ‘works with’ the Bush Crime Syndicate, or what remains of it, reflects annoyance that America’s ‘closest ally’ has disregarded such sensitivities – which, given the way that we are being treated these days by the Americans, should come as no surprise.

Some observers of these events, especially (through no fault of their own) any ‘latecomers to the party’, indicate that they are often baffled by the endless twists and turns, the ying-yang switches or, more precisely, the dialectical reversals of which these narratives bear record.

And they bear record of these extraordinary events for eternity, because we have had to republish these reports in our financial journal International Currency Review, so that they are available for study and analysis both now and in the future – ensuring that a veil can NEVER be drawn over this criminality at the highest levels of the American Government, aided and abetted by stupid foreign accomplices who were too greedy or blind to see what was happening.

But another way of looking at the up-and-down switches purveyed in these narratives would be to compare what we are observing, with exorcism. Now the Editor’s late friend, Father Malachi Martin, who died in July 1999, was an exorcist, and taught the Editor about this process. His remarkable book ‘Hostage to the Devil’ [Reader’s Digest, 1976; HarperSanFrancisco, ISBN 0-06-065337-X, 1992] describes the exorcism of five Americans, whose cases the Author selected because of the type of their demonic infestations which this expert considered to represent the most common categories of demonic possession prevailing in the United States in the first half of the 1970s.

Malachi Martin taught the Editor the remarkable and mysterious fact that the ONLY Name to which Evil Spirit (a phrase used to define either single or multiple possession; and most possessions are multiples) is that of Jesus Christ. At the mention of His Name, Evil Spirit is invariably terrified – a momentous fact repeatedly revealed in the Gospels, if only we have the humility to understand.

The spirits within the possessed who pleaded to be released into the Gadarene swine, knew who He was and pleaded for ‘mercy’. And before being exorcised, the possessed recognised Jesus for who He is and ran towards Him and fell down at His feet and worshipped Him:

‘But when he saw Jesus afar off, he ran and worshipped Him. And cried with a loud voice, and said: What have I to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of the most high God, that thou torment me not?’.

‘For He said unto him, Come out of the man, thou unclean spirit. And He asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many’.
[Mark, Chapter 5, verses 6-9].

In this sequence, we learn two important things. First, the mysterious reality, in this context, of the interchangeability of the singular and the plural (a mystery first manifested in the Book of Genesis). While Evil Spirit considers himself to be one, he also acknowledges that he is like a dog covered in lice: the possessed has multiple ‘familiars’. The second point (of paramount importance) is that Evil Spirit(s) have a name (names). In order to exorcise them, their name(s) must be called.

This explains why we repeatedly mention the perpetrators of these crimes BY NAME: because, in order for their perversity to be capable of any explanation at all, it is prudent to assume that they are possessed: otherwise they would be susceptible to reason, which they are not (which is why negotiating with them is a complete waste of time: as Lenin taught, all their agreements are to be reneged upon at their own perverse will).

Another famous exorcism, which appears at the beginning of the Gospel of Mark, illustrates the extraordinary mystery of the fact that Evil Spirit recognises and responds ONLY to the Name of Jesus Christ – a verified fact so remarkable that it serves as a compelling reason for faith that Jesus Christ is precisely who He is, and that the Word was indeed made flesh for our salvation. When the Editor learned and understood this, all his naïve doubts collapsed.

In Mark Chapter 1, verses 23-26, we read:

‘And there was in their synagogue a man with an unclean spirit; and he cried out, Saying, Let us [plural] alone, what have we to do with thee, thou Jesus of Nazareth? Art thou come to destroy us? I know thee who thou art, the Holy one of God. And Jesus rebuked him [singular], saying, Hold thy peace, and come out of him. And when the unclean spirit had torn him, and cried out with a loud voice, he came out of him’.

But the exorcist cannot achieve the appropriate outcome if he himself is tainted, has lapsed from his faith in the Lord, and is behaving sinfully. If he attempts an exorcism without having what the ancient Jews would have described as ‘purified himself’ (through prayer, repentance and partaking of Holy Communion), he may find that he is in very great danger during exorcism.

• Because Evil Spirit will quickly ascertain where his weaknesses lie, and will at once exploit them to defeat the exorcism process, harming the exorcist as well.

The classic example of this is written in Acts of the Apostles, Chapter 19, verses 13-16:

‘Then certain of the vagabond Jews, exorcists, took upon them[selves] to call over them which had evil spirits the name of the Lord Jesus, saying, We adjure you by Jesus whom Paul preacheth’.

‘And there were seven sons of one Sceva, a Jew, and chief of the priests, which did so’.

‘And the evil spirit answered and said, Jesus I know, and Paul I know; but WHO ARE YOU?’

‘And the man in whom the evil spirit was, leaped on them, and overcame them, and prevailed against them, so that they fled out of that house naked and wounded’.

This report illustrates the further extraordinary fact, known to exorcists, that the possessed may display almost superhuman strength when aroused. The possessed may even be able to pick the defeated exorcist up and throw him physically around the room, or even out of an open window. Therefore, exorcism must never, ever, be attempted other than by a properly prepared exorcist-priest who is ‘in Christ’ and can deploy His Name to cast the Evil Spirit(s) out, without physical or mental or spiritual danger to himself and others.

We can now apply the above metaphor to our experience in teasing out the truth behind the endless twists, turns, dialectical deceptions, ‘bait and switch’ operations, and other heinous abominations familiar (unfortunately) to readers patient enough to absorb these narratives.

Thus there have been many occasions when Evil Spirit has got the better of ‘the exorcists’ – those seeking to enforce the Rule of Law – and has accordingly gone on to perpetrate further, seemingly endless, ever more brazen crimes, despite the reality that he/they are cornered and have no hope of escaping from the hell that they have created for themselves and everyone else.

This reflects the fact that, by definition, the ‘exorcists’ have often been at a disadvantage when confronting the devious minds of these criminals – who, however, have only a restricted box of tricks available to them, in conformity with the spiritual reality that Satan operates within God’s universe, not the other way round.

So there have regrettably been many occasions when a position of clear advantage gained by the ‘exorcists’ has subsequently been squandered by their carelessness, arrogance, fatigue, or other factors that have set back the resolution of this crisis, and have thus temporarily encouraged the criminalist operatives to carry on with their financial crimes on the naïve assumption that they have always got away with it, so why should this ever change?

However what ‘latecomers to the party’ may not realise is that stupendous progress against this criminality has been made since 2005-2006, after Leo Wanta was successfully used as the ‘lever’ with which the can of worms has been ‘successfully’ prised open. Naturally, this has represented a catastrophic failure for the usurping Intelligence Power, which had assumed that it was invincible, and could never be outmanoeuvred.

In conclusion, those who (no doubt thankfully for them) have missed the earlier chapters of this horrendous narrative [but see the Archive], should understand that, as a direct consequence of these exposures of the condoned and embedded financial criminality, previously complacent law enforcement has been well and truly aroused from its slumber, the criminal operatives are on the run, they are turning on each other like rats in a sack, and they WILL be decisively defeated.

Try a little faith.


LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:


• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.


• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.


• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.


• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.


It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s