IMPASSE DRIVEN BY FEARS OF HARSH I.R.S. INVESTIGATIONS

chrisstory

TAX EVASION AND MONEY-LAUNDERING (= TERRORISM UNDER PATRIOT ACTS)

Tuesday 7 July 2009 21:01

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

CALLING EVIL GOOD, AND GOOD EVIL
‘Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!’

‘Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!’
Isaiah, Chapter 5, verses 20-21.

• PRECISE FACTOR IMPEDING SETTLEMENTS IDENTIFIED

• PAYOUTS HAVE TO BE EFFECTED ON THE BOOKS

• PAYEES MUST PAY TAX ON THEIR RECEIPTS

• U.S. PENALTIES FOR TAX EVASION ARE BARBARIC

• WHEN THEY FIND OUT, ORDINARY AMERICANS MAY REACT VIOLENTLY

• ‘NONE OF THIS MUST EVER COME OUT, YOU UNDERSTAND’

• ‘NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENTS’ PLOY DESTABILISED BY THIS SERVICE

• NEW LIES FOR OLD AND OLDER LIES FOR NEW

• COUNTRY RECIPIENTS STILL BEING MESSED ABOUT

• STASI OPERATIVE MERKEL IN THE WHITE HOUSE

• ROOTS OF EXTREME TENSIONS BETWEEN THE U.S. AND GERMANY

• PROSPECTS FOR A DEVASTATING FINANCIAL COLLAPSE

• PATIENCE EXHAUSTED: EXPOSURES BEING PLANNED

• THE DIALECTICAL YING-YANG REDIRECTION ROUTINE

• THE THEFT COVER-UP DISINFORMATION BARRAGE

• OTHER RELATED AND RELEVANT WORLD REVOLUTION DIMENSIONS

• BEHIND MICHAEL JACKSON’S ‘SUDDEN DEATH SYNDROME’ EXPERIENCE

• GHOULISH CREATION OF THE BUSH CRIME SYNDICATE

• DANIEL FINKELSTEIN’S INANE INTERVENTION

• BERNIE ECCLESTONE REVEALS HIS TRUE (BUSH) COLOURS

• ‘COMMON PURPOSE’ CAMERON’S MINDLESS PC ‘GAY PRIDE’ BEHAVIOUR

• THE ‘CONSERVATIVE’ PARTY AND E.U. CORRUPTION

• GORDON BROWN RISKS EXPOSING HIMSELF AND ‘FRIENDS’

• MUNN’S FALSE APOLOGETICS FOR DEVIANT MEN

• SIMULTANEOUS ‘GAY PRIDE’ EVENTS ALL OVER THE WORLD:
WELCOME TO THE WORLD REVOLUTION

• BARROSO BEING PUSHED FOR A NEW E.C. TERM

• OPERATIVES IN CHARGE TODAY THREW TV SETS OUT OF WINDOWS IN THE ’60S

• WHY EUDEOLOGUES BUTTRESS BROWN TO PREVENT AN EARLY ELECTION

• BROWN’S MIND IS A TABULA RASA

• PROPER ACCOUNTING WOULD SHOW BIG BANKS TO BE BUST

• BANKS CONTRIVE DESPERATE NEW SURVIVAL WHEEZES

• U.S. ‘STATE WITHIN THE STATE’ CLINGING TO ITS ‘BLACK FINANCING’ ‘RIGHTS’

• OBAMA COMPARED TO A MAGICIAN (SORCERER)

• ‘STIMULUS’ AND STATE MONIES HELD UP BY SETTLEMENTS IMPASSE

• SETTLEMENTS IMPASSE DRIVEN BY FEAR OF I.R.S. INVESTIGATIONS

• U.S. OFFICIAL AND BANKING SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS REMAIN NOTORIOUSLY WORTHLESS

• PSY-OPS OFFENSIVE DESIGNED TO COVER UP THEFTS

• GRAND JURIES HAVE NOT BEEN SITTING IN VAIN

• THEY’VE GOT TO PAY TAX ON THEIR RECEIPTS

• THEY WANT THEIR MONEY BUT THEY DON’T WANT AN I.R.S. INVESTIGATION

• PREDICTED ECONOMIC DISINTEGRATION MONITORED

• EVEN THE FED’S CHIEF ECONOMIST IS ALARMED

• ‘ZERO’ INTEREST RATES TO ENTICE MONEY BACK INTO HEDGE FUNDS

• EQUALLY HORRENDOUS DATA FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD

• THE MONEY IS READY – BUT SITTING ON THE SIDELINES

• INCOMING MI6 CHIEF EXPOSED BY HIS WIFE

• INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW: Volume 34, Numbers 3 & 4: Comprehensive coverage of the twists and turns of this crisis between September 2008 and June 2009, containing details of many of the astonishing goings-on in the lawless space called the intergovernmental sector.

• In this ‘Black’ arena, ‘anything goes’, assets of other parties are stolen and traded, deception is standard practice, and everyone lies to everyone else. This huge issue, currently ‘on machine’,
provides a devastating record and critique of the deplorable behaviour of the Big Powers, as they fight over stolen money. Please apply via the CONTACT US facility for availability and price details.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice are comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor’s study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing global financial corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Just press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

• The Editor’s $35,000 Wanta bail-out money has been stolen.

• See the second white panel for details of our latest distributed intelligence publications.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

• COPYRIGHT NOTICE: The Editor and his companies have taken measures to obtain protection and recompense for the gross breaches of copyright material, books and works owned by this service, our companies, the Editor and Author, and the Authors whose interests we must protect. In the first place, a pirate platform service in the United States has received a demand for a very large sum of money to compensate us for the wanton stealing of three of our books, the consequence of which barbaric acts has been effectively to destroy our book publishing business. Secondly, the agents for the Google Settlement have been specifically informed by registered mail that we have written, also by registered mail, to the four universities and one public library who have entered into an agreement with Google under the so-called ‘Google Settlement’.

The universities in question are: Oxford, Stanford, Harvard and Michigan; and the public library is the New York Public Library. Our three companies have opted out of the Google Settlement, which is anyway now in some disarray.

These and related parties have been advised that if ANY of our works, published by all three of our companies, not just the intelligence books company which has already been severely ransacked, are assaulted by copyright pirates, we will take all legal measures open to us to enforce our rights and those of our authors. The rationale underlying this scourge is the false and spurious one that the intellectual property of the whole of humanity is the property of the ‘global commons’: a dirty, revolutionary piece of hypocrisy and subversion, the underlying purpose of which is to destroy small publishers so that there will be no dissenting voices to The New Underworld Order.

When time permits, we will be providing ‘further and better particulars’ concerning this outrageous revolutionary development. In the meantime, those amoral persons and parties who have so far downloaded our works are hereby warned that every single download will be traced, and that they risk being pursued for very large damages for gross and insolent breaches of our copyright.

Anyone wishing to reproduce the important anti-World Revolution article posted here must contact the Editor for written permission, on the understanding that a precise form of words that we will specify must accompany any reposting and that the entire article, with credits, must be displayed. Any deviation will be treated as a breach of copyright and dealt with accordingly [see above].

• ROGUE’S GALLERY OF DECEIVERS: Given the deceit and abuse that has been meted out to the Editor of this service since we began these investigations in 2002, the Editor plans to expose, by name, each of the primary perpetrators of deception against us, including a UK-based deceiver recently unmasked who sought to extort money for delivering sensitive packages that he never delivered. This character has been reported to the Police, and a Major Crime Book Number will be sought with a request for an investigation. The relevant documents have been sent by registered and signed-for mail, to the Special Branch officer concerned. Those who have deceived us will be made to endure the consequences of their serial duplicity, starting with Leo Wanta, to whom the Editor lent $35,000 to pay for his release from irregular probation, which should have been paid back on 11th June 2007 but concerning which nothing has been heard. All other collaborators and operatives who tried to decieve us at various stages will also be exposed for their deception.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and our ‘politically incorrect’ intelligence books online from this website.

• NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

PRECISE FACTOR IMPEDING SETTLEMENTS IDENTIFIED
Now that the angle of real economic decline has steepened to the point at which the US and world economies face a much worse outcome than in 1929 (see below), we are in a position to pinpoint the PRECISE factor which underlies the slump. It is this.

The officials, operatives, intermediaries, bankers and others who have stolen and diverted between $300 trillion and $500 trillion of funds and who are being compelled to disgorge this loot, cannot reveal ‘source of funds’. And the reason for THIS is simple:

• Since the disgorged money has to be paid out in a transparent manner – that is to say, on the books – TAX will be payable on the paid-out funds.

• This tax will, moreover, be payable IMMEDIATELY.

PAYOUTS HAVE TO BE EFFECTED ON THE BOOKS
Tax accruals onto the Treasury’s books are TRANSPARENT. So, when this money is paid out, and vast accruals of tax transforms the Treasury’s books, people are going to start asking questions like: what on earth has been happening?

Where has all this money, that’s been sitting on the sidelines, come from? Millions of people have been thrown out of work, factories are being mothballed or closed down, supermarket shelves are increasingly bare or filled with the cheapest possible junk, nobody’s buying anything: and yet, all of a sudden, this avalanche of hidden money materialises – money that could have been deployed BEFORE millions were thrown out of work, BEFORE factories were closed or mothballed, and BEFORE supermarket shelves started resembling the shelves of stores in Zimbabwe.

• So what’s being going on?

• And THAT’s the question that the criminalist cadres are all terrified to have to answer.

And it’s NOT just because they don’t want to pay the tax due on the payout monies (although that’s an important ongoing factor here, too).

No, what these people are scared out of their wits about is that payment of the Settlement monies will, by definition, be liable to expose the fact that THEY are tax evaders:

• All co-conspirators and Accessories to the Fact of these Fraudulent Finance operations face the prospect of MANDATORY Internal Revenue Service investigations into their preceding financial histories. IRS agents will want to know ‘source of funds’, and they won’t be able to tell them without incriminating themselves. And in the uncompromising post-Bayou, post-Madoff and post-Stanford environment brought about by the reprobate intransigence of these crooks, that frightens them.

• Jail sentences for tax evasion in the United States are extremely severe, even barbaric. But the tariff’s on the Statute Book and the Courts are now applying the FULL TARIFF.

•And that, friends, is the ROOT CAUSE OF THE IMPASSE. ‘They’ are absolutely terrified.

PAYEES MUST PAY TAX ON THEIR RECEIPTS
Put bluntly, all concerned – whether inside the official structures, agents, intermediaries, handlers, crooked bankers or brokers – who have payments due to them must (a) pay tax on the money and (b) divulge to the IRS agent all relevant information relating to ‘source of funds’. Which means that it is more than likely that these people will be identified as having evaded tax and having engaged in money-laundering – implying prosecution and a savage jail term.

Therefore, every ruse under the sun has been deployed to avoid such an outcome. And as this downward spiral continues and the real economy is being crucified, the money that has been stolen and illegally multiplied sits on the sidelines and is being systematically blocked (up to our press date) by the President of the United States and the US Treasury Secretary, who controls the Internal Revenue Service himself. So the highest-level officials are, or have been, systematically impeding the financial solution to their own and the whole world’s problems because the stolen money has to be paid onto the books, tax has to be paid on it, and such receipts will have to be reported to the Internal Revenue Service.

U.S. PENALTIES FOR TAX EVASION ARE BARBARIC
And large numbers of both recipients and perpetrators could go to jail under the TEFRA legislation of 1986 for 20 years, as a consequence of the MANDATORY investigations that will follow.

That, in a nutshell, is the central core of the problem. And it exposes the deeper meaning behind George Bush Sr.’s notorious observation that ‘if the people knew what we have done, they’d string us all up on lamp posts’.

We appear to be fast approaching that outcome. Sources inform us that many US States missed distributing their paychecks on the 1st July. Can you imagine what will happen if this breakdown is repeated in the coming months? The Editor personally knows an employee of a well-known utility who has to rise every morning at 3:30 am to travel for an hour and a half to work, so as to be at her desk at 6:00am. Such hardworking employees are taxed at source.

WHEN THEY FIND OUT, ORDINARY AMERICANS MAY REACT VIOLENTLY
When such Americans discover that the corrupt élite and the financial sector snakes have been evading tax on a stupendous scale under the past four US Administrations, while the ordinary American has been paying his or her taxes regularly without protest, they are going to explode. And we mean precisely that. The American people are EXTREMELY ANGRY, and rightly so.

Within the space of four Administrations, the US economy has been ransacked and decimated by criminal operatives that we and others have exposed. And please take note of this nuance:

• Everyone who is not sitting on his or her brains is aware that the economy is in severe slump, and that the slump is getting much worse by the week. As we report below, the properly computed rate of US unemployment is believed to be approaching 19%. But because ordinary Americans are naturally preoccupied with running their daily lives, providing for their families, etc, they do not necessarily know WHY this is happening.

• It’s when they finally become aware of WHY their lives are being wrecked and their standard of living is being destroyed, that their anger will know no bounds.

• With State paychecks not arriving and California floating IOUs in lieu (which cannot easily be financed, contrary to a new wave of Wall Street bravado on that score, given that institutional investors are likely to demand significant discounts to compensate them for the risks they will be running in acquiring these ‘assets’ of a bankrupt State), the AMERICAN people will, if this long-term observer of the United States’ experience is any guide, take matters very decisively into their own hands. In California, too, more than 238,000 State employees have been working two days less per month since February, and variations on this theme are reported from 22 US States.

‘NONE OF THIS MUST EVER COME OUT, YOU UNDERSTAND’
So, on top of being terrified that they are liable to be exposed as tax evaders, these parties are probably starting to have sleepless nights over their own physical safety. And don’t forget that the Bush Sr. operative Gwendolyn Waymark (not her real name) warned the Editor in May 2003, after he had returned from interviewing ONI Vreeland in Niagara Falls, Canada, that ‘none of this must ever come out’, you understand.

• ‘It must never come out’ because all concerned are liable to be fingered for evading tax IN THE PAST, never mind about their dislike of having to pay tax on the suppressed payout money NOW.

So, faced with this situation and the prospect of going to jail for 20 years, the crooked players who are holding Americans, the United States and the Rest of the World to ransom, prefer instead to let the real economy crash – in the Fascist expectation of being able to mop up remaining real assets with hidden, off-balance sheet, offshore funds at fire sale prices.

• That’s the underlying game plan: BUT WE KEEP DESTABILISING IT.

‘NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENTS’ PLOY DESTABILISED BY THIS SERVICE
On 1st July 2009, we threw into total confusion the proposal to impose ‘Negotiated Settlements’ on a ‘take it or leave it’ basis. This is not the first time that this website has indeed upset the criminal planners’ stratagems. And the reason they hate our guts is that they KNOW we are right. The money has to be paid out in a transparent manner, with tax paid into the Treasury and receipts given for the taxes paid. The IRS will then have to decide what to do next.

One ‘way out’ might theoretically be for the President of the United States to issue an Executive Order declaring a Tax Amnesty for a limited period, to cover all recipients of Settlement payout monies. Why has this amoral expedient not been applied? Several reasons:

• It would have to be applied across the board and would need to be ‘seen to be fair’.

• People would ask why a tax amnesty is necessary at a time when tax revenues are collapsing.

• The criminalist cadres STILL think they can continue evading reality, and continue to place their own interests and concerns (including not being caught for tax evasion and money-laundering) above those of ordinary American taxpayers and everyone else.

NEW LIES FOR OLD AND OLDER LIES FOR NEW
Therefore, the US intelligence-linked dialectical manipulators, the familiar ying-yang merchants, the professional hired disinformation agents, and the army of parasitical counterintelligence deceivers who are paid to bamboozle the American people and the Rest of the World, have been harder at it than ever since we last reported. What else is novel? The accelerated frequency of their lies, for starters. And secondly, the monumental proportions thereof.

First, on Tuesday/Wednesday last week, we were advised by three sources that President pro tempore Barack Obama had intervened to stop the payments. Then, on Sunday 5th July, we were advised by a Trustee who sourced his information to ‘Head of State’ level in Europe, that Mr Obama issued Executive Orders on the morning of 4th July to the effect that all payees must be paid and all recipient parties must have been satisfied within 72 hours.

• But since the banks were closed on Saturday and Sunday, and our sources say that no bank staff turned up to effect the payments, quite clearly this reported presidential ‘intervention’ was devoid of meaning, unless this latest 72-hour ‘window’ period was meant to start on Monday morning: as indeed the President would have known if and when he issued such Executive Orders.

In between, we were ‘authoritatively’ advised that the money had been sent to China. Then, later, we were informed that it was all ‘safely back with the US Treasury’ (FACT: NO money held within Treasury accounts is safe). When we asked whether, en route to China, the stolen and diverted funds had visited the moon, there was no answer. Which was perhaps not surprising, given that the President of the United States is ‘travelling’.

In which connection, a stand-off with GRU-Prime Minister Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin appears to have been yet another ploy, given reports that Obama’s intelligence brief may have required him to ‘split’ Putin from Mr Medvedev – a risky venture, since Putin is Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU), whereas Medvedev is plain common or garden KGB.

In exchange for maximum cooperation across a wide range of issues, including no doubt Iran, and in the context of a possible pledge by Barack Obama to follow through on non-deployment of the anti-missile installations in central Europe, the covert Soviets were asserted to have demanded release of the illegally blocked Settlements funds once and for all. None of this has surfaced in the open reports, which have focused on the urgent need to replace existing bilateral arms reduction arrangements that expire in December 2009.

• Late on Tuesday 7th July, UK time, there were indications of a further ‘it’s on’ sequence in play, with Trustees having been summoned to the payout banks, and so on. These reports continued right up to the time of posting, so we have been unable to verify them at this time.

COUNTRY RECIPIENTS STILL BEING MESSED ABOUT
Meanwhile, furious at STILL being messed around, representatives of a number of payee countries are believed to have travelled to the United States recently, where they made their views known in appropriate circles and language in no uncertain terms. Also visiting the United States recently has been Frau Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor and ‘former’ STASI/DVD operative, who spent her formative years at Marx-Lenin University in East Berlin as the Secretary of the Young Communists’ Agitation and Propaganda Department.

Although we have published this information several times in the past, Merkel’s STASI connections are now surfacing into the public domain, AT LONG LAST. Specifically, on 3rd July 2009, Bloomberg repeated a report in the German newspaper Bild that Chancellor Merkel’s weekend home in the Uckermark region of Brandenburg is being guarded by ‘former’ STASI agents. Brandenburg is the German Federal State that surrounds Berlin. The Brandenburg Interior Ministry informed Bild that it employs 58 ‘former’ STASI officials, Bloomberg’s report added.

STASI OPERATIVE MERKEL IN THE WHITE HOUSE
This woman appeared of late in the Oval Office where, by all accounts, she told the President of the United States what to do, although she is having to tread ‘very carefully’ here. After all, as agent for George H. W. Bush Sr., the head of Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (Dachau) in the United States, where one of the CIA’s headquarters buildings is named the ‘George Bush Center for Intelligence’, she is in a position, if not to stamp her jackboots, at least to crack the financial whip.

She is in a position to do this because Deutsche Bank acquired the derivatives clearing facilities of JPMorganChase, which is the custodial bank for all the corrupt banks involved in the Settlements equation. Operationally, these institutions work together, but at the same time, their relationship must be as fraught as that between the US and the German Governments, since a credit default at any time could cause a cascade of defaults, or defaults could be the result of other defaults; and both Governments can therefore bring pressure to bear on the other across a very wide range of issues, in an environment of almost unbearable ‘Black’ tension.

Underlying this symbiotic relationship ‘made in hell’ are the following realities:

• Frau Merkel continues as Bush Sr.’s paid (bribed) agent and serves the interests, therefore, of the Bush-Clinton-CIA-DVD Financial Crime Syndicate.

• At the same time, Frau Merkel likewise represents the fraught interests of Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank, which have accumulated colossal volumes of derivatives ‘assets’ since 1984. The volume of such trash held by these corrupt institutions is far greater than the total volume of derivatives held in the whole of the United States, by an enormous order of magnitude.

• The worn phrase ‘hoisted with your own petard’ springs to mind.

ROOTS OF EXTREME TENSIONS BETWEEN THE U.S. AND GERMANY
Therefore, the tension between Washington and Berlin is so great that it is safe to say that both countries have the immediate capacity to destroy the other, with ironically the Germans being far more vulnerable to a real catastrophe even than the United States in terms of the sheer volume of junk assets held by the big German banks. (On top of which, Merkel faces an election soon, with her odious colleague, Herr Steinbrück, the German Finance Minister, breathing down her neck).

This means that there is an extremely delicate balancing act that both sides are forced to play, as they jockey for influence over each other and connive to take ridiculous measures to prevent the collapse of the entire global banking system.

Quite simply, these two powers are caught in a ghastly embrace of their own making (or rather, thanks to the CIA/DVD) – which accounts no doubt for the arrogance with which the Godfather laughed at the whole world at Kennebunkport in June, when he parachuted out of a plane to demonstrate that nobody has the guts to interfere with his parachute: which was meant to tell everyone: I AM IN CHARGE AND THERE’S NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT.

PROSPECTS FOR A DEVASTATING FINANCIAL COLLAPSE
In reality, the entire top-heavy house of toxic cards that George H. W. Bush Sr. has conjured into existence as a consequence of the illicit trading of stolen and multiplied assets by the Intelligence-Crime Syndicate since 1984, is sitting astride a razor blade and could come crashing down on him and every single one of his layers of co-conspirators at any time, cutting all of them up into small pieces. A commercial property crash is imminent whether these people come to their senses or not. Faced with this state of affairs, the Crime Syndicate imagines, unbelievably, that it can revert, after multiple con-tricks and manipulations, to hypothecation ‘business as usual’ – so long as NOBODY ROCKS THE BOAT. Hence Ms. Waymark’s original observation to the Editor of this service:

‘None of this must come out, you understand’.

In the light of recent developments, it appears that earlier reports of some payments having been made were false. As previously mentioned here, given the deliberate and persistent dissemination of falsehoods by those with an interest in covering up the serial financial and other abominations and thefts, so as to avoid being sent to jail for tax evasion, everyone ‘in this business’ is liable to be deceived at some stage. But according to both ‘underground’ and ‘overground’ sources, no parties have been paid – least of all following our exposure dated 1st July, in which we revealed that a crude attempt had been made to push ‘Negotiated Settlements’ onto the table, backed by an arrogant ‘take it or leave it’ attitude.

• Apparently after we exposed this latest ruse, everything from the White House’s duplicitous perspective ‘went into free-fall’. There was also US official alarm at the fact that we have had to pass certain files detailing evidence of financial fraud, to Thames Valley Police (Special Branch).

PATIENCE EXHAUSTED: EXPOSURES BEING PLANNED
To which the short answer is: if you mess people about and lie to them on an open-ended basis, and you make the mistake of imagining that you can continue to behave like this with total impunity, eventually those with shorter fuses will get fed up and will take appropriate unilateral action. Which is what we have announced we intend to do. But here again, our words have been twisted by one or two people who think they can tell us what to publish, and when.

On 1st July 2009, we simply reiterated what certain parties had been advised earlier, namely that the 1st July 2009 (close of business) deadline mentioned was NOT BLUFF, but that thereafter we will be collaborating with certain parties to ventilate hard, detailed exposure information which will ‘burn’ key perpetrators, operatives and other malefactors by name and in detail.

These reports, sourced from contacts, will be backed by Affidavits to provide the Editor of this service with protection, and will NOT be contingent upon payment of Settlements funds. Obviously if that were to take place, the matter might be reviewed; but given that no undertakings by US or for that matter complicit European (including ‘Head of State’) provenance can, on the basis of past experience, be relied upon, we and associates are no longer prepared to be lied to for the rest of our lives, and fully intend to deploy the power of exposure to maximum effect.

THE DIALECTICAL YING-YANG REDIRECTION ROUTINE
Since one or two people have taken it upon themselves to hassle us on this score, the Editor points out that when we have the material, we will edit and publish it. We ourselves are not engaged in assembling the researched materials: we are waiting for them to be provided to us.

In the meantime we will be continuing with regular reports, although there is every likelihood that these may be pushed to one side as the exposure operation acquires momentum. As the criminal operative Lenin taught, the ONLY weapon that the criminal operatives fear is exposure: and one reason for this is the standard criminal intelligence community norm that there are only two rules:

(1) Don’t steal what your fellow rival criminal operative has already stolen; and (2) don’t get caught. Because if you get caught, we won’t help you. On the contrary, we will probably make extra certain that you’re locked up in the Gulag for the indefinite future so that you can’t expose US.

Before going any further, a few considerations on the use of the dialectical method of throwing sand in our faces, may be appropriate here. By now, the manipulators will have cottoned on that not everybody is fooled ALL of the time by their endless lies and wheezes. This realisation makes life more problematical for them, as they have to work harder to swat nasty bugs like the Editor of this service, which keep popping out from behind the filthy curtains.

However, the reality that the abused American people, and their sympathisers abroad, after years of being lied to, are better informed about the fact that they ARE being lied to on an open-ended basis, does NOT actually change the behaviour of the manipulators. As you will have noticed, they continue with their ying-yang dialectical ploys: On Tuesday/Wednesday, Obama intervenes to stop the payments (depressing expectations); on Saturday, he issues Executive Orders requiring their completion within 72 hours (raising expectations).

THE THEFT COVER-UP DISINFORMATION BARRAGE
Hence, the fact that virtually everyone who is aware of this corruption has come to recognise the ying-yang procedure as a sordid routine ploy, does not make the manipulators think twice about continuing with this deception technique. On the contrary, whether we understand the cynical mind-games they are playing or not, is a matter of indifference to them. Because even if we DO understand what they are up to, their technique STILL WORKS.

Recall that when threatening the Editor of this service in 2004/2005 with fabricated false witness, the veteran British MI6-linked ‘journalist’ Gordon Thomas uttered a phrase as memorable as the warning conveyed by Gwendolyn Waymark restated above:

‘It doesn’t matter that it’s not true. All that matters is that it’s OUT THERE’.

Hitherto, we’ve refrained from mentioning that with this single remark, Gordon Thomas destroyed the credibility of everything he has ever written and published throughout his professional life, including, for instance, his study of Mossad.

With the grave and accelerating deterioration of this crisis, our own stance has had to change. Those who are preparing to supply us with the necessary exposure material, which takes a little time to put together, have accepted that these exposures should have been triggered a long time ago. They have understood this, because the manipulators have gone several steps too far. One can perhaps accept modified undertakings half a dozen times: but when promises are blatantly broken more than that, the reaction can be harsh. An uncompromising response to these cynical manipulators and provocateurs is what is called for at this juncture: and, having been at the receiving end of provocations designed to shut us up, this service stands ready to oblige.

OTHER RELATED AND RELEVANT WORLD REVOLUTION DIMENSIONS
One or two people seem to think they can tell us what to publish, and what not to publish. This is a novel doctrine: that armchair parties with whom we have and never will have any relationship and who pay this commercial enterprise nothing at all, think they can order us around!

Apparently what these shallow people take exception to is our exposure of separate dimensions of the World Revolution through which we are living, other than the issues surrounding the Financial Fraud Ponzi scams and thefts. In the first place, we do not ‘work for’ these people; and secondly, we don’t ‘work for’ anyone at all, contrary to what some people with a narrow, compartmentalised mentality, appear to believe.

Further, while it may appear to the uninformed that certain social and spiritual issues are ‘not related’, they most definitely are. Be very mindful, please, that you don’t skip what now follows.

BEHIND MICHAEL JACKSON’S ‘SUDDEN DEATH SYNDROME’ EXPERIENCE
That ‘sudden death syndrome’ experienced by a creature fond of making satanic hand signals called Michael Jackson: was it an accident? His body is evidently to be buried in a $15,000 gold-plated coffin encased in concrete. Now why on earth would this be necessary?

The increasingly scurrilous and revolutionary London Daily Telegraph carried a photograph of this ghoul on 28th June (page 9), sticking his left hand up with the two index fingers making a variant of the familiar devil’s salute so favoured by George W. Bush Jr., Mrs Laura Bush, Elizabeth Taylor, Dan Quayle, General Tommy Franks, Silvio Berlusconi, King Abdullah, and now Sarah Palin.

But Jackson, this repulsive, decadent paedophile, a protégé of Elizabeth Taylor, wasn’t just a ‘pop phenomenon’ that erupted out of nowhere, bamboozling and depraving millions of ignorant and gullible sheeple with his overtly pornographic, paedophiliac and filthy narcissism.

No. He was ‘an operation’: and who do you suppose was his ultimate ‘controller’? Think of someone who stands for wall-to-wall depravity and the Works of Darkness to whom we refer in every report. You got it in one: George Herbert Walker Godfather-Satan Bush Sr.. This fact is quite well known among Los Angeles area showbusiness cognoscenti, who point to certain real estate connections.

Michael Jackson was also reported as having ‘assisted the CIA’ with ‘Operation Clydesdale’, which was ostensibly concerned with exterminating criminal paedophile gangsters operating in Eastern Europe. This ‘line’ implies a further ‘connection’ with the Bush Criminal Syndicate, and would have been intended to cover Mr Jackson’s active participation in paedophile operations run by a cadre within the corrupt and depraved Intelligence Power, motivated by the notorious CIA objectives of (a) furthering depravity and (b) generating streams of ‘Black’ CIA funding in the process.

GHOULISH CREATION OF THE BUSH CRIME SYNDICATE
Michael Jackson was a creature of the Bush-CIA/DVD Crime Syndicate, a money-making ‘platform’ operation which – like the later J. K. Rowling Harry Potter committee-written, witchcraft-teaching, child-depraving operation directed by a filthy revolutionary cell inside the ‘Black’ components of British counterintelligence – was framed with just two objectives in mind:

• To maximise the revolutionary potential for calling good evil, and evil good, in order to generate mass multiple personality disorder among our children and young people so as to satisfy depraved revolutionary mind-control objectives and to enlarge the pool of children ‘available’ for abuse.

• To establish a money cow and a consequent flow of funds for ‘platform’ trading purposes.

DANIEL FINKELSTEIN’S INANE INTERVENTION
A ‘sorcerer’ who writes in The Times, London, called Daniel Finkelstein, a grinning, self-satisfied fellow who thinks he has life ‘sussed’, filled the whole of page 22 of this particular Murdoch rag on 1st July 2009 with a ‘thoughtful’ article entitled ‘After Jacko’s death, we know the War is Over’.

What war? Oh, the Culture Wars, of course! Finkelstein’s instrumental (and ignorant) theme was that ‘the Culture Wars have been won’ – that the generation of the ‘sixties is in full charge, and old fogies such as your Editor who missed the ‘sixties, thank goodness, are about die off, so they don’t count. ‘We’re all (depraved) pop fans now’, this revolutionary Useful Idiot, who is something to do with the so-called ‘Conservative’ Party (see below), proclaimed. ‘War is Over’.

Well, not so far as we and everyone we know are concerned, it isn’t. Just because a whole feckless generation has been brainwashed by Workers of Darkness into calling good evil and evil good, that does not mean to say that the War is Over. On the contrary, what it signifies is that the war has to start over. Wide indeed is the path to destruction, and narrow is the way to salvation; and few there be that choose that way (1). You can assess Whom we paraphrase here.

As for Jackson, let’s revert briefly to his experience of ‘sudden death syndrome’. It has been put to us by the informed sources who made us aware of Jackson’s ‘Bush dimension’, that those forces who are engaged in warfare behind the scenes against the CIA-DVD Bush-Clinton Crime Syndicate, eliminated Jackson in order to close down the ‘trading platform’ potential that was associated with this manipulated, depraved paedophile. Recall that tickets for exhibitions of narcissistic Jackson depravity to be launched from the epicentre of geomasonry, London, were being sold for venues throughout the world, out to next spring: a nice depravity-spreading little earner, hey what?

Now despite assurances that the fools who rushed to buy tickets to ogle at this devil will get their money back, what do you think will happen to their money?

• If you imagine they’ll be getting it back, keep imagining. Also, there’s an awful lot of loot to be milked from the death of a devil who’s to be buried in a gold-plated casket encased in concrete. And where have we ever read of bodies being buried in cement? Plus: we WONDER WHY he needs to be buried in concrete. No doubt George Herbert Walker Paedophile Bush knows the answer.

BERNIE ECCLESTONE REVEALS HIS TRUE (BUSH) COLOURS
While on the subject of Bush Crime Syndicate assets, it may be recalled that we have previously mentioned the rôle of Bernie Ecclestone, the Formula One (Monaco) commercial rights holder, as a bridge or intermediary/agent between George H. W. Bush Sr. and the disreputable former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. Monaco is a prime CIA money-laundering centre, and London is or was the biggest financial casino in the world.

As widely reported, Ecclestone only had to mention in an interview that ‘Hitler was a man who could get things done’, referencing Herr Shickegrüber’s reorganisation of German (war) industry and the construction of autobahns, to be countered by widespread negative reaction, especially from the Jewish community. Speaking later to the German newspaper Bild, Ecclestone said that ‘this was all a big misunderstanding. I did not put Hitler forward as a positive example, but I simply noted that, before his appalling crimes, he acted successfully against unemployment and the economic crisis’.

Ecclestone added that he had not intended to ‘hurt the feelings of a community… many of my closest friends are Jews’ – most of whom, it seems, do not yet understand that prominent Jews such as Eichmann were directly involved in organising the Holocaust, which was a ghastly ethnic cleansing exercise (see Chapter Ten entitled ‘The Thousand-Year Reich’ in the Editor’s book The New Underworld Order available via the Edward Harle Limited books section of this website).

But the key point here is that Ecclestone has now revealed how precisely he fits into the Nazi environment inhabited by the Bush Crime Family, of German Jewish extraction.

• At Dachau, the heirs of the Nazi Abwehr and Jewish intelligence cadres of similar persuasion collaborate, which is THE Big Secret. And of course organised sport, huge spectacles (such as Michael Jackson) and organised ‘art’ are extensively exploited as money-laundering conduits. Mr Ecclestone’s name has been mentioned in connection with drug-trafficking operations.

‘COMMON PURPOSE’ CAMERON’S MINDLESS PC ‘GAY PRIDE’ BEHAVIOUR
We referenced above the so-called ‘Conservative Party’, which is run by a fellow called David Cameron. This brainwashed young operative is a disgrace to the Editor’s wonderful school, Eton College. Like the British Ambassadors to Warsaw and Sofia who have nothing better to do these days than to disseminate ‘Gay Pride’ greetings to orchestrated displays of aggressive homosexual revolutionary narcissism in the capitals to which they are accredited, Cameron was reported on 3rd July to have ‘publicly apologised for’ Section 28, the law introduced by the Thatcher Government banning local authorities from PROMOTING homosexuality.

In other words, this Useful Idiot, which is what Lenin would have called him, thinks IT’S A GOOD IDEA FOR LOCAL AUTHORITIES TO PROMOTE SEXUAL DEVIANCY.

Specifically, speaking at a ‘Gay Pride’ event, Mr Cameron said: ‘I am sorry for Section 28. We got it wrong. It was an emotional issue. I hope you can forgive us’.

No, Mr Cameron, it is YOU who has got it wrong, you lily-livered, amoral vote-grubber. You have no convictions of your own: your mind is a Common Purpose-stuffed mind, full of ‘politically correct’, i.e. INCORRECT, platitudes and panaceas which fill the gap in your apparently ‘hollowed out’ soul.

You aspire to be Prime Minister of what remains of the United Kingdom on a platform of calling good evil, and evil good. You have lost not only this Editor’s vote, but those of the very large numbers of British voters who follow this website.

• We can see from your craven cowardice and submission to the revolutionary preoccupation with turning everything upside down, that you are not to be trusted as Prime Minister.

THE ‘CONSERVATIVE’ PARTY AND E.U. CORRUPTION
Mind you, your Party has shown itself to be completely untrustworthy across an entire spectrum of issues, starting with its equally craven acceptance of the status quo in Europe – including that idea that it’s OK that we should continue to pour billions into the European Commission, the accounts of which have been qualified now for FOURTEEN YEARS RUNNING.

• It is ILLEGAL for public moneys to be paid to a criminal enterprise, didn’t you KNOW THAT?

• The fact that your fellow Useful Idiot Gordon Brown is content with this corrupt state of affairs, notwithstanding that if Value Added Tax receipts paid over to the Brussels criminal enterprise were diverted to the Treasury, his financial problems would be resolved in short order, doesn’t excuse YOU from not grasping this self-evident reality.

GORDON BROWN RISKS EXPOSING HIMSELF AND ‘FRIENDS’
Naturally, where Cameron featured in this ‘love-in’ with the aggressive revolutionary homosexual lobby, the ‘challenged’ Gordon Brown wasn’t far behind. So, on 2nd July, the British Prime Minister told ‘Gay Pride’ marchers that his policy on homosexuality was that ‘you can’t legislate love’. He should tell that to his ‘rivals’ Tony Blair and Lord Mandelson!

He made this fatuous comment in a message to ‘Gay Pride’ marchers. And on 4th July, his wife, an operative, was reported in the UK media to have ‘joined thousands of revellers including Michael Cashman, a Labour Member of the European Parliament and former EastEnders sit-com actor and his ‘partner’ Paul Cottingham’ in ‘Pride London’, ‘the annual gay parade through the capital’. Also separately observed at such a revolutionary event was Cameron’s equally deluded ‘Conservative’ fellow Old Etonian, Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, who was formerly MP for Henley.

Ironically, it has been a bishop from Pakistan, of all countries, namely the Bishop of Rochester, Dr Michael Nazir-Ali, who has been called to rebuke the reprobate and wayward political, church and revolutionary establishments in Britain, which is sliding so rapidly down the drain that there won’t be anything left to see in a few years’ time. Dr Nazir-Ali correctly asserts the central fact that truth is not malleable, to be bent in order to accommodate those who can’t face up to it.

• Which is the standard line of revolutionary reprobates such as Derek Munn, the Director of Public Affairs, no less, for Stonewall, the militant homosexual campaign group.

MUNN’S FALSE APOLOGETICS FOR DEVIANT MEN
In the lead story coverage given to this sordid issue on the front page of The Sunday Telegraph on 5th July, Munn waffled: ‘It is unfortunate that in 2009, a church leader should continue to promote inequality and intolerance…’.

• Have you identified the deceit and lies contained within these few words?

First of all, what has 2009 got to do with it? Have the truth and good been amended to fit in with the fashionable preferences of people living in 2009? Note also the embedded weasel implication that a healthy attitude towards sex is passé.

What is has always been clearly unhealthy and extremely dangerous (apart from being disgusting if you stoop to think what these people do to each other), is OK in 2009, for some reason. Presumably this Mr Munn thinks we have ‘grown out of’ boring righteousness. We don’t need it any more. His approach, of course, represents relativism gone mad; and what he is actually mouthing is the age-old delusion that Man is in charge here, not God. (Vide the Book of Genesis, and the Apostle Paul’s Epistle to the Romans, Chapter 1). Man (i.e. Munn) can make up his own mind what is good and what is evil; and then, having called good evil and evil good, is entitled, Munn-Man asserts, to RAM HIS PERVERSIONS DOWN EVERYONE ELSE’S THROAT.

As for the rest of his sentence, who is promoting inequality? Inequality implies that at least two entities have to be compared. What is being compared? Like all these muddled and brainwashed operatives, he doesn’t define his terms. A Bishop upholds Biblical teaching, and this somehow represents ‘inequality’.

What Munn really meant was that he wants carte blanche to fornicate with someone of his own sex, and the Bishop is trying to stop him. Actually, what the Pakistani Bishop called for was repentance.

If Mr Munn and his associated men prefer not to repent, there is no compulsion on them to do so. (They will pay for their arrogance later – see above – but that is their own lookout).

In the meantime, we do not need to witness Munn’s Man-movement’s contrived ‘outrage’ at being told that the course they are following is the broad way towards perdition. That is the truth of the matter and they are welcome to ignore it. But just as they can ignore the truth if they so wish, so we may ignore their raving, contrived revolutionary ‘requirement’ that we should all stop and marvel at their perversions. We don’t need to know about them at all, but for some diabolical reason these particular revolutionary Useful Idiots have been mass-brainwashed into assuming that we do.

SIMULTANEOUS ‘GAY PRIDE’ EVENTS ALL OVER THE WORLD:
WELCOME TO THE WORLD REVOLUTION
Has it ever occurred to you that this is a World Revolutionary operation? How come that ‘Gay Pride’ marches erupt in New York, Washington, Seattle, Los Angeles, Tokyo, Warsaw and Sofia all at the same time – when a few years ago, and for a hundred millennia before that, they never took place?

Ask yourself, likewise, what lies behind the ‘in-our-face’ depravity of manufactured, manipulated ghouls like Michael Jackson? The only satisfactory outcome for this truly pathetic creature who contributed so much to the collapse into obscenity, is that he’ll spend the rest of eternity encased in concrete. That’s quite a proxy for what hell has to offer for all those who follow the broad way to perdition by perversely insisting that good is evil, and evil good. And that goes for the millions of deluded ‘fans’ who have been worshipping this fallen, dead idol, and have been cravenly pouring money into the pockets of the Bush-Clinton CIA-DVD Crime Syndicate in the process.

BARROSO BEING PUSHED FOR A NEW E.C. TERM
While on the subject of revolutionary perversions, the little Portuguese President of the European Commission, identified as the senior EC official who ‘chose’ five-year-old Madeleine McCann to be his plaything, is being heavily pushed by the Great Brainwashed also known as the Dark Forces within the European Union Collective, to serve a further term as the President of this institutionally corrupt criminal enterprise. This is happening DESPITE the fact that this nasty little fellow has been exposed as a paedophile, with our report dated 20th September last year in which this exposure was featured duly blocked by censors in Portugal, according to this service’s informants.

The point to be stressed here is that such perversity reflects a common characteristic of these operatives. When you stamp on them, it has no effect. And when you expose them, they re-emerge as an equally bad smell somewhere else.

It is hard for normal observers to comprehend this abnormal behaviour: but it is consistent with what we have observed over the years in confronting intelligence-linked Workers of Darkness. The point was made by Paul in Chapter One of his Epistle to the Romans, where, after his description of the perversions with which we are all familiar these days, in verses 18-31, he concludes:

‘… who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death [viz, spiritual death] not only do the same, but HAVE PLEASURE IN THEM THAT DO THEM’ (3).

OPERATIVES IN CHARGE TODAY THREW TV SETS OUT OF WINDOWS IN THE ’60S
To revert to the havoc wreaked by the Western Governments, led by the Americans and the British, as they continue perversely to pursue flawed economic and financial policies that are diametrically opposed to common sense, some hard economic numbers culled from around the world, itemised (for Britain and the United States) below, show how expertly they have contrived to destroy almost all the furniture in the room.

This is hardly surprising, since as Mr Finkelstein has so helpfully reminded us, the people running our governments today were hippies and Useful Idiot flower children with daisies in their hair and hashish in their pockets, in the 1960s. And one of their favourite pastimes in those evil days was throwing television sets out of windows.

Metaphorically speaking, these people are throwing television sets out of windows to this day. Offered a choice between pursuing sound finance and embarking upon a slide towards the abyss, they have of course made the latter selection. Whether these deviant choices reflect arrogance, ignorance, perversity, weakness of character or sheer bloody-mindedness, is hard to say.

WHY EUDEOLOGUES BUTTRESS BROWN TO PREVENT AN EARLY ELECTION
Gordon Brown’s domestic political situation is so weak that the ‘builders of Europe’ are desperate for him to cling to office at least until the New Year, because the confused ‘Conservatives’ appear to be on the verge of doing just one thing right: holding a referendum on Britain’s relationship with ‘Europe’ if they are elected and the Lisbon Treaty hasn’t been ratified by then (which they clearly anticipate it will have been). That, the EUdeologues calculate, would sink the European Union Collective’s Lisbon Treaty, which effectively destroys the residual national sovereignty of the satrap European nation states that have fallen into this long-range pan-German trap (2).

Although the German Constitutional Court has demanded legislation which will give supremacy over European Law to the Bundestag, so that the Lisbon Treaty may be in jeopardy ironically from the Germans themselves (as the Irish are being browbeaten into changing last year’s ‘NO’ decision in a new ‘change your mind’ referendum this autumn so as to deliver the answer that Brussels requires), a British General Election this autumn is regarded as the greater threat.

As a consequence, the obsequious Europeans were reported to be sucking up to Brown, first at a one-day Summit meeting with President Sarkozy at Evian, France on 6th July, and secondly at the Group of Eight meeting in L’Aquila, Italy four days later.

Specifically, President Sarkozy’s chief foreign policy adviser, Jean-David Levitte, a top French intelligence operative and the former French Ambassador to Washington, has ludicrously started praising Mr Brown to the skies, substituting ‘entente formidable’ for ‘entente cordiale’ in a replay of the tired and discredited mind-games that the Americans routinely play with the moribund Anglo-American ‘Special relationship’.

According to diplomatic sources cited by The Times, London (6th July):

‘Mr Brown’s position with European leaders is enhanced because they fear that a leadership challenge and early election could sink the treaty, which is due to come into force by Christmas. The Conservatives are committed to a referendum if they are elected before it is ratified’: and since any referendum on British’s relationship would yield a decisive NO (as we hate this German trap), Gordon Brown is co-conspiring with the Continentals to frustrate the wishes of the British people and to destroy the sovereignty of our nation. As for Cameron, he’s agnostic on this score.

BROWN’S MIND IS A TABULA RASA
And as for Brown’s contribution to the resolution of the global crisis, his mind appears to be a total blank. In the G-8 context, Mr Brown was said to be intending to ‘sound a wake-up call for the world economy’, against the background of a 75% increase in oil prices this year, protectionist measures which are adding to the de facto collapse of trade and business (see below) and the total failure of banks to restart lending because (which remains unstated) the banks are mainly in fact bust.

And the reason that many are bust is that they hold vastly more in trash (derivatives and subprime junk) than in cash, as would be revealed if proper accounting principles were to be applied.

PROPER ACCOUNTING WOULD SHOW BIG BANKS TO BE BUST
If a proper accounting of the big banks’ positions were to occur, most of the Big Names would be exposed as bankrupt. Private bankers are concerned at the prospect of 25% capitalisation, as many are holding more derivatives and sub-prime non-assets than cash. These are all on the short-term side of the balance sheet.

A proper accounting of short-term liability ratios would reveal that a large number of banks are bust and therefore (as we have argued before) completely surplus to requirements, let alone to the needs of the real economy. That a cull of Big Banks will occur is a certainty.

Given this horrifying state of affairs – which has arisen exclusively as a consequence of the speculative and illicit Fraudulent Finance operations conducted during the free-for-all that has raged since 1984 – the only way many of these banks (which offer only one product: DEBT) can hang on, is by behaving as though their derivatives portfolios represent real value, contrary to the objective reality that they are largely worthless. In their increasingly desperate attempts to remain ‘relevant’, some ‘Big Names’ are therefore coming up with ‘new wheezes’, as though what they are doing is ‘innovating’ again – whereas the harsh reality is that they are trying to stitch new clothing together in a hurry to cover up their nakedness.

BANKS CONTRIVE DESPERATE NEW SURVIVAL WHEEZES
Hence on 6th July, The Financial Times (which now suddenly costs TWO POUNDS A COPY in a time of ‘deflation’, by the way) carried a front page report entitled ‘Banks reinvent securitisation to cut capital costs’, beginning with the following paragraph:

‘Investment banks, including Goldman Sachs and Barclays Capital, are inventing schemes to reduce the capital cost of risky assets on banks’ balance sheets, in the latest sign that financial innovation is far from dead’.

‘The schemes, which Goldman refers to as “insurance” and BarCap calls “smart securitisation”, use different mechanisms to achieve the same goal: cutting capital costs by up to half in some cases, at the same time as regulators are threatening to force banks to increase their capital requirements’.

‘BarCap’s structures involve the pooling of assets from several clients into a secured financial product [sic] that can be sold to other investors and rated by a credit rating agency, potentially reducing the capital allocated against the assets by between 10% and 50%’.

‘These new mechanisms are in some respects similar to discredited structured products such as Collateralised Loan Obligations, which were widely blamed for fuelling the financial crisis. But the schemes’ backers argue there are two significant differences. First, they involve the securitisation of banks’ existing assets, rather than of new lending. Second, bankers argue that the new products [sic] do not disguise the transfer of risk’.

Neither do they disguise the fact that banks are desperately trying to shore up their individual houses of cards against the prospect that as this hideous crisis develops vicious characteristics, their cupboards will be found to be bare, and they will collapse. Manifestly, Gordon Brown has no clue how such problems are to be overcome, because, like his American counterparts, he rejects the ONLY SOUNDLY BASED SOLUTION in the circumstances: transparent financial trading on the books. Fear of being caught for tax evasion is rife in the United Kingdom as well, although the penalties are nothing like as draconian as in the United States.

One can also detect that these ‘innovative’ bank securitisation formulae represent elements of a rearguard campaign by these bankrupt institutions to try to generate funds so that when it comes to ‘source of funds’ time, they will have a ready (false) explanation for how the money was ‘made’.

U.S. ‘STATE WITHIN THE STATE’ CLINGING TO ITS ‘BLACK FINANCING’ ‘RIGHTS’
In the US context, we have long since identified precisely where the key problem lies; and in the course of doing so, we have highlighted the reality that there is no power with the guts and the determination to stand up to the predatory and amoral US Intelligence Power, which relies upon Fraudulent Finance and endlessly proliferated sources of ‘Black’ funding, to finance its absolute independence from the decrepit Federal Government, and thus to sustain its malevolent status as the predatory ‘State within the State’, instead of being SUBSERVIENT to the White House.

This analysis is extended in the latest issue of our financial journal, International Currency Review. To understand the crisis in the United States, one must first be aware of the forces that sustain it. And since Geithner, Obama, Bernanke and Clinton are beholden to and are either operativesof, or assets of, the Intelligence Power which has usurped the Presidency (by placing its own operatives in the highest slots), there is at least an underlying rationale, beyond terror at being sent to jail for tax evasion, for the disastrous financial and economic course that the Obama Government is hell-bent on pursuing – creating mountains of debt on the other side of the ‘cash for trashets’ equation, all of which are TOTALLY UNNECESSARY because if financial trading operations were finally to be conducted openly and transparently ON THE BOOKS and EXCLUSIVELY in the private sector, its proceeds could be taxed at 35%, triggering a massive ongoing waterfall of on-the-books accruals to the Treasury without the US authorities needing to incur a single cent of additional indebtedness.

It follows that the perverse refusal of the Obama White House and the Geithner Treasury to pursue this course, which was agreed upon by the Group of Seven Financial Powers in 2007, pleaded for by The Queen when she informed them that the Dollar System on-the-books Refunding should go ahead ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’, and which has been extensively expounded by this service, represents nothing less than:

• A wilful act of Financial and Economic Terrorism committed by the American Government against its own people, by burdening US taxpayers with vast accumulations of toxic background Treasury debt that is TOTALLY UNNECESSARY. To complain that this behaviour is brain-dead would be much too polite. It is recklessly irresponsible.

• The White House may not LIKE the CORRECT SOLUTION because it deprives corrupt officials and office-holders of opportunities for self-enrichment, and risks exposing multiple co-conspirators to prosecution for past tax evasion and money-laundering: but the CORRECT SOLUTION would quickly finance everything that Obama SAYS he wants to achieve.

OBAMA COMPARED TO A MAGICIAN (SORCERER)
Which reminds us again that the first-rate academic thinker, Professor Michael Hudson, has put his perceptive finger on who we should be comparing Barack Obama with: namely, a magician, a.k.a. a sorcerer. In Hudson’s recent analysis for Global Research, the Professor pointed out that there is a total disconnect between what Obama says, and what he does (the double-mindedness dimension, a.k.a. the dialectic, again):

‘The disconnect is not accidental. Its rhetoric follows the strategy of a stage magician whose patter talk serves to divert attention away from what his hands are actually doing’.

• Like Tommy Cooper, the great, late British comic magician. When our Tommy had a heart attack on stage, and fell down dead, the audience roared with laughter.

• THEN THE CURTAIN CAME DOWN WITH A DEAFENING THUD.

‘STIMULUS’ AND STATE MONIES HELD UP BY SETTLEMENTS IMPASSE
Speaking of which, it’s curtains in California, where Governor Schwarzenegger has announced that he’ll be shutting his State Government offices on the first three Fridays of every month (shades of Britain’s ‘three-day week’ in the early 1970s under fellow Nazi stooge Edward Heath), and has also declared a fiscal emergency.

He’s had to do that because the money allocated from the Settlements for the States had not been paid by the beginning of July: similar situations are reported from a total of 22 American States, we understand. US States are not allowed to run unfinanced deficits, and must balance their books.

Likewise, barely 10% the Obama-promised so-called ‘Stimulus Money’ had been forthcoming, either.
Neither the money for the US States nor the bulk of the ‘Stimulus Money’ can be paid out until the Settlements funds are released; and as explained in this report, these funds have hitherto been blocked not only because the controlling US Intelligence ‘State within the State’ is so jealous of its hegemony which is financed by ‘Black’ financial operations that will be rendered impossible when Settlements are paid out, but also because of deep fears that both payees and perpetrators will be vulnerable to mandatory Internal Revenue Service investigations for past tax evasion and money laundering (which is TERRORISM under the Patriot Acts legislation).

SETTLEMENTS IMPASSE DRIVEN BY FEAR OF I.R.S. INVESTIGATIONS
The reason that the US ‘State within the State’ won’t be able to finance its usurped status after the Settlements funds have been remitted relates precisely to the fact that the monies must be paid out transparently ‘on the books’ with TAX PAID at source on remittance, in the context of ‘source of funds’ disclosure – which risks IRS tax evasion and money-laundering investigations.

So, unless the IRS is now instructed by the US Treasury and the White House to turn a blind eye to launching such investigations, this impasse will drive the US economy and the whole world into a hellish economic depression with no historical precedent – notwithstanding the fact that hundreds of trillions of hijacked dollars are sitting ready on the sidelines, continually traded by the criminalist classes, and which should be paid out to end the Settlements stalemate and therefore the overall financial and economic crisis.

Do you suppose that Barack Obama actually REMEMBERS all that empty rhetoric concerning the ‘Stimulus Money?’ As well as the US States not being paid, no other parties have been paid, either: not even the corrupt politicians who are scheduled to be rewarded, we understand, for their serial venality and corruption expertise. Certainly the ‘countries’ hadn’t yet been paid at our press date, contrary to earlier understandings. According to one usually unreliable ‘underground’ source, the money has been placed out on contract – which may have had something to do with the story about the funds disappearing to China, and /or with the statement attributed to Bush Sr., namely that ‘they’ intend to ‘play with’ the money until August.

U.S. OFFICIAL AND BANKING SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS REMAIN NOTORIOUSLY WORTHLESS
It’s probably tautological to reiterate that any foreign government or party entering into financial contract arrangements with the US Government should seriously consider brain surgery. Nothing that any American Government does or says can be trusted. None of its undertakings can be relied upon. American money center banks have a reputation for duplicity, thievery and dishonesty that has to be experienced to be believed. Our researches in the Manhattan Court have confirmed that when we describe specific US financial institutions as criminal enterprises, we do so with impunity because we are not only stating the truth, but are indulging in gross understatement.

Nothing that US agencies and spokesmen say or publish these days can be believed. The entire edifice of the US Government has been polluted by the lies, disinformation, mind-games, MK-Ultra operations and other Psy-Ops. depravities perpetrated daily against the American people by the arrogant Intelligence Power which controls the US Government as a malevolent ‘State within the State’. And these lies and perversions are ALL motivated by ONE OBJECTIVE alone: to bamboozle the American people so as to prevent them from becoming aware that between $300 trillion and $500 trillion has been diverted and stolen: and having been retrieved is sitting on the sidelines while the economy collapses, because the CIA wants to retain its ‘Black financing rights’ and its associates fret about IRS investigations for tax evasion and money-laundering.

PSY-OPS OFFENSIVE DESIGNED TO COVER UP THEFTS
Or put another way: what is so difficult to understand is that the longer these frantic US operatives continue with their cynical mind-games over the Settlement funds which they are under extreme pressure to pay out, the more obvious it has become to observers that the Psy-Ops offensive has one objective only: and it has nothing whatsoever to do with ‘national security’: it’s to throw sand in our faces, to create diversions and to bamboozle everyone concerned, so that the huge thefts and Financial Fraud can continue to be covered up – even though post-Bayou, post-Madoff and post-Stanford, everyone can see that it is only a matter of time before the big fish are finally caught in the resuscitated Rule of Law net themselves.

GRAND JURIES HAVE NOT BEEN SITTING IN VAIN
For according to our sources, the multiple Grand Juries that have been examining myriad strands of the Octopus’s abominations, have not been sitting in vain. The machinery of law enforcement, when it comes to its senses, grinds slowly (unfortunately), but it grinds exceedingly small. The way things are going, it is safe to assume that, notwithstanding the wayward behaviour of this White House and this Treasury, there’s nowhere for the giga-criminals to hide.

• It’s maximum tariff time in the Courts – which just MIGHT make some of these criminal operatives think a little more carefully about whether they really are all that interested in contemplating the natural history of the North American cockroach for decades on end.

Except that their terror of being investigated, indicted and convicted for tax evasion acts as a deterrent to ‘coming clean’ and bringing this catastrophic death march to an end. In other words, the perpetrators are caught in a vice that they constructed themselves: if they settle, they risk being investigated for tax evasion and money-laundering; if they continue stalling, they will wind up being brought to justice as a consequence of the slow-moving, but lethally effective, recovery of the US forces of Law and Order, driven in part by the deliberations of the Grand Juries.

THEY’VE GOT TO PAY TAX ON THEIR RECEIPTS
When, as is inevitable, the stolen and diverted Settlement funds are paid out, the recipients MUST PAY TAX ON THEIR REMITTANCES. The money must be paid ON THE BOOKS, which means that the accruals will be taxed. Co-conspirators of all shapes and sizes, who have been manoeuvring for years to get paid, nevertheless fear that reality.

• Because when they are compelled to pay tax on their payouts, they will have to reveal ‘source of funds’: whereupon they risk being investigated for EARLIER tax evasion. It’s not just that they don’t want to pay tax on any remitted Settlement funds (which they don’t): it’s that they don’t relish being investigated under TEFRA 1986 for evading tax for many years in the past.

THEY WANT THEIR MONEY BUT THEY DON’T WANT AN I.R.S. INVESTIGATION
The hideous dilemma these people therefore face is that they want their money, but they don’t want to be investigated by the IRS and State tax departments.

In this sense, therefore, both payees and perpetrators, the distinctions between whom are often blurred, are stuck in a Terrible Totentanz. Something’s got to give: and because of the accelerating descent into the abyss, which we believe is at the tipping point of running completely beyond any recall, what is going to have to give is that the Settlements are going to have to be paid out: and the payees and perpetrators are going to have to face the consequences.

As for the Rest of Us, we are left to contemplate the devastation that the incompetent fools calling themselves policymakers in our countries have already achieved, after throwing all the furniture and TV sets out of the window because they have been working in lock-step with the corrupted institutions and tax evaders themselves, given that British and US politicians have been bribed to ‘cooperate’ or keep their mouths shut.

For in the real economy, the crisis has only just begun, with a new downwave imminent, if we assume that President Obama’s reputed issuance of Executive Orders last Saturday demanding completion of the Settlements, is yet another bluff and delaying tactic. On the basis of experience, that is the appropriate conclusion to be drawn. Meanwhile the hundreds of trillions of dollars that are needed to reboot the economy are sitting on the sidelines being traded by the crooks and not paid out in order to avoid the likelihood of tax evasion and money laundering investigations.

PREDICTED ECONOMIC DISINTEGRATION MONITORED
In the United States, earnings have declined at an annualised rate of 1.6% in the past three months In May, 467,000 US jobs were lost and time worked was 6.9% lower than a year earlier, dropping to 33 hours a week – a far steeper decline than during the 1990 and 2001 recessions, according to analysts. So far, the United States has lost NINE MILLION full-time jobs during the first leg of this downwave, which reflects the criminal factors identified above.

According to the Centre for Labor Market Studies in Boston, US unemployment has already reached 18.2%, if it is counted according to the former criteria used, compared with the OECD’s ‘harmonised unemployment rate’ reading for March 2009 of 8.5%. But even on that basis, 13.2 million American employees were out of work in that month.

Expectations of employment prospects in the United States, measured on a ‘Future Tendency’ basis, had collapsed from ZERO expectations in March 2008 to MINUS 48% by February 2009. Order books are sparser than for nearly a century, and a business confidence indicator had slumped to a reading of 36% by March 2009 (readings above 50% indicate improving confidence and vice versa).

EVEN THE FED’S CHIEF ECONOMIST IS ALARMED
The vast accumulation of completely unnecessary debt that the Geithner Treasury is accumulating because of its perverse refusal to ‘permit’ transparent on-the-books taxed private sector trading with no Government participation and therefore no official debt creation, is even alarming officials within the Federal Reserve Board itself. In a paper published in 2003, Thomas Laubach, the Board’s senior economist, calculated the impact on long-term interest rates of rising US fiscal deficits and consequently soaring national debt. Applying his 2003 assumptions to the recent developments, he has concluded that US long-term interest rates will soon double from their current level of around 3.4%. This would make it punitively expensive for the Treasury to finance the long-term borrowings that it could have avoided if it had not been headed by controlled puppets of the CIA Intelligence Power and Wall Street (the only product of which is debt).

• Both domestically and globally, profits earned by the world’s largest firms fell by an estimated 34% in the second quarter of 2009, according to Standard and Poor’s, with a further 21% decline expected during the third quarter of this year.

In the United Kingdom, almost 50 graduates are scrabbling for every job with leading employers, compared with 30 last year, while the number of vacancies for them is 25% below the level that was recorded in the third quarter of 2008.

UK Industrial production was running at 88.5% of its year-earlier level last March, while ‘Future Tendency’ expectations for employment that month had slumped to minus 49, compared to minus 13 a year earlier, indicating extreme pessimism surrounding employment prospects at a time when a million school and university leavers will flood onto the labour market this summer and autumn.

A similar ‘Future Tendency’ assessment published by the OECD in Paris showed a reading of – 54% compared with a positive reading of 13% in March 2008, while the level of order books was – 63% in March 2009 compared with +4% in the same month a year earlier, Stocks held by manufacturers had risen to 32% (nobody is buying anything much) compared with 13% in March 2008; while a parallel confidence indicator in the manufacturing sector showed a negative 50% compared with a positive reading of 1% a year earlier. ‘Future Tendency’ research covering the British construction, retail trade and services sectors, revealed huge negative readings of 48%, 38% and 32% respectively, compared with year-earlier findings of – 2%, – 13%^ and +19%.

‘ZERO’ INTEREST RATES TO ENTICE MONEY BACK INTO HEDGE FUNDS
And in both Britain and America (and elsewhere) interest rates have been reduced to near zero, penalising savers as never before, for a reason that has never been revealed: to drive surplus funds back into Hedge Funds as part of the (failing) ongoing rearguard offensive to try to reignite the moribund and false derivatives trading sector, so that the carousel can somehow continue, and the US Intelligence Power can retain its usurped status.

EQUALLY HORRENDOUS DATA FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD
We could blind you with similar numbers relating to countries you may have thought were likely to be sheltered from the storm, including Switzerland where ‘Future Tendency’ surveys have shown negative data for manufacturing sector employment prospects ( – 67%), production ( – 30%), order book levels (down 59% year-on year), confidence ( – 42% year-on-year) and stockbuilding (up to 36%) – all of which represent nothing short of COLLAPSE when compared with year-earlier data.

Equivalent real economy findings for Australia, Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, even Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Sweden and Spain (where unemployment reached 17.4% of) the workforce in March and rose towards 19% subsequently, just like in the pre-boom days) all make terrifying reading. As plants close, pay packets dry up, retail consumption slumps and more factories close, so that more pay packets dry up and more factories close: and so on towards social chaos and actual revolutionary violence in the streets.

SWISS ENFORCEMENT CADRES STILL SEEKING EXECUTION OF WORLD COURT WRIT
Unsurprisingly, given the surprisingly dreadful condition of the Swiss ‘real’ economy, it is mainly Swiss enforcement cadres who, with their Chinese equivalents, are reportedly still engaged in procuring the execution of the World Court Writ that fell due on 1st May and which was handed to President Obama in London on 1st April, according to the relevant and reliably sourced information published by this service WHICH HAS NEVER BEEN CONTRADICTED.

We speculate, in this context, that President Obama will have issued his alleged Executive Orders on 4th July for the releases to take place, in order to provide himself with necessary ‘cover’ during his travels, since the issuance of such orders provides ostensible ‘evidence’ of his intention to settle. But of course we all know that such White House ‘intentions’ are usually devoid of content.

THE MONEY IS READY – BUT SITTING ON THE SIDELINES
And yet hundreds of trillions of diverted, hijacked and overdue Settlement dollars are sitting on the sidelines, being traded by the criminal cadres fronted these days by President B. Obama who issues Executive Orders that his rebellious/cooperating subordinates are at liberty to ignore – on the instructions of the controlling Intelligence Power, which still refuses to let go of its position as a ‘State within the State’ financed by ‘Black money’.

• That factor is at least as important as the fear of investigation for past tax evasion.

• In combination, these forces condemn the world to hell on earth – unless the Settlements are released: which of course this sermon is designed to help procure.

INCOMING MI6 CHIEF EXPOSED BY HIS WIFE
PS. Earlier, we reported that the Germany-oriented Sir John Scarlett, the head of MI6, or the Secret Intelligence Service. (known in the old days as ‘C’), is stepping down this month, and also that he is being replaced by Sir John Sawers, Britain’s Ambassador to the United Nations in New York.

On 6th July it emerged that Lady Sawers had placed a large amount of personal data on Facebook, accessible to an estimated 200 million users worldwide. In addition to pictures of Sawers running around on a beach in bathing trunks, his wife recorded details of their London flat, their children, their circle of friends, and where they go on holiday.

• The Times carried a large cartoon of Sawers standing at the top of the hideous MI6 headquarters building in Vauxhall, across the River, in his bathing knickers.

In response to expressions of the gravest concern, including by Patrick Mercer, Chairman of the House of Commons’ Counterterrorism Sub-committee, Mr Millipede, the little Pole who’s filling in as Foreign Secretary while Gordon Brown clings to office so as to ensure the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty ahead of the British General Election contrary to the wishes of the British electorate but in accordance with Mr Millipede’s own bias, remonstrated on BBC One that it was ‘no State secret’ that Sir John wore Speedo swimming trunks on family holidays, adding:

‘For goodness’ sake, let’s grow up’. Neither is it a State secret that Britain is run these days by a bunch of deluded laid-back jackasses, also referred to by people known to this Editor who move in Government circles as ‘the scum of the earth’.

Of exceptional interest, in view of the widely-held suspicion that the outgoing ‘C’, Sir John Scarlett, is effectively a German stooge, The Times’ report on this wholly unbelievable display of stupidity made passing mention of Lady Sawers’ half-brother, Hugo-Haig Thomas, a former diplomat, who was among those featured in family photographs on Facebook.

The Times’ report added: ‘Mr Haig-Thomas was an associate and researcher for David Irving, the controversial historian who was jailed in Austria in 2006 after pleading guilty to Holocaust denial’. Mr Irving, for reasons not publicised and entirely separate from Holocaust denial, is a repulsive creature. Exposure of this extraordinary intelligence calls into question our earlier hope that Sir John Scarlett’s successor might be someone who prioritises Britain’s rather than the long-range pan-German strategic deception apparat’s interests.

Notes and References:
(1) ‘Enter ye at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it’. Matthew, Chapter 7, verses 13-14.

(2) The European Union Collective represents the realisation of a detailed German political control blueprint developed in Nazi Germany and originally published in Berlin in 1942 in a compendium entitled ‘Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft’ (European Economic Community), copies of which are held at the Staatsbibliothek, Berlin, and in the British Library, London. The Chapter headings of this Nazi document correspond almost precisely to the subject headings of the Maastricht Treaty of 1992. The EU’s Lisbon Treaty, if ratified, will provide the ‘capstone’ on this long-range pan-German strategic deception operation designed to decapitate the European nation states, and to facilitate German economic and political hegemony.

• Ironically and typically, given the financial crisis for which the successors of the Nazi pan-German Abwehr (military counterintelligence) are largely responsible, Germans have become bored with this monster that their controllers have created in order to satisfy their lust for power and control.

(3) Paul’s list of the abominations with which we are confronted every day as the World Revolution driven by the Workers of Darkness appears to overwhelm us, represents the most devastating condemnation of reprobate human behaviour ever compiled.

• Chapter 1, verses 25-32 reads as follows:

‘Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet.

And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge*, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient.

[* i.e. they removed religious teaching from the schools – Ed.],

Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity, whisperers,

Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things,
disobedient to parents,

Without understanding, covenant breakers, without natural affection,
implacable, unmerciful:

Who, knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them’.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

Advertisements

RELEASES OCCURRED ON 1ST MAY AS DEMANDED BY WRIT

BUT THE CUSTODIAN BANKS ARE ILLEGALLY BLOCKING TRUSTEES’ ACCESS

Thursday 7 May 2009 08:00

THE BANKS ARE OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, ARE ACTING ILLEGALLY, AND ARE IN GROSS AND BLATANT BREACH OF THEIR BASIC FIDUCIARY DUTIES AS CUSTODIANS OF THEIR CLIENT TRUSTEES’ PAID-IN FUNDS. THESE BANKS ARE PERPETRATING FINANCIAL TERRORISM:

• FUNDS WERE PLACED IN THE TRUSTEES’ ACCOUNTS ON 1ST MAY

• BUT THE CUSTODIAN BANKS HAVE SO FAR ILLEGALLY BLOCKED ACCESS TO THE FUNDS

• THE WRIT HAS THEREFORE NOT BEEN FULLY EXECUTED

• WERE THE BANKS GIVEN PERMISSION TO ACT ILLEGALLY?

• WARNING TO GEITHNER IN THE LIGHT OF THE ABOVE

• OBAMA AND GEITHNER OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE AND PERPETRATING TERRORISM

• CRIMINAL FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES AND THEIR DIRECTORS

• ENFORCEMENT TEAM CONTINUING ITS NECESSARY WORK

• THE CRIMINAL BANKS HAVE NO EXCUSE THIS TIME

• NOW WE KNOW WHY THE TRUSTEES WERE ABUSED ALL WEEKEND

• THE AIR FORCE ONE EPISODE OVER MANHATTAN

• THE CURIOUS MATTER OF THE BRIEFCASE UNDER THE TABLE

• ‘WEAPONISED PNEUMONIC OR BUBONIC PLAGUE’

• FORMER U.S. HIGH OFFICIALS CONTINUE RUNNING ‘BLACK OPS’

• WILD REPORTS BY ANONYMOUS UNPROVENANCED SOURCES

• OUTGOING BRITISH M.E.P. BLASTS THE SHAM EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

THE SOLUTION TO THE CRISIS THAT HAS BEEN AVAILABLE ALL ALONG:
Operating the $ Refunding from London without US Government participation delivers:

(1) Massive ongoing windfall tax accruals to the BRITISH Treasury given that all funds resident in the United Kingdom jurisdiction for 24 hours are taxable by the Inland Revenue. This makes the UK Refunding proposal of extreme interest to Her Majesty’s Government and the UK Treasury.

((2) Massive ongoing windfall benefits to the UNITED STATES Treasury given that it will also receive a cascade of tax accruals from this independent private sector Refunding Program.

(3) The necessary refinancing of the UK and US banking systems ON THE BOOKS with no input from either Government and NO CORRESPONDING DEBT CREATED IN THE BACKGROUND.

(4) GOOD (i.e., on-balance sheet, taxed) money which will CHASE OUT THE BAD MONEY that the crass US Fraudulent Finance concoction will generate.

• In mid-March we published: International Currency Review Volume 34, #2 on Systemic Fraudulent Finance and The Legalisation of Financial Corruption. Also published recently are issues of our titles The Latin American Times, Economic Intelligence Review, London Currency Report, Interest Rate Service and Arab-Asian Affairs. Issues of Soviet Analyst and Global Analyst are imminent.

• For details, see the second white panel on the Home Page.

• To subscribe to our intelligence services, see the catalogue under World Reports Limited.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice is comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor’s study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the Internet Security Solution software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

• DONATIONS: You can help finance these exposures (which the Editor has to prepare on top of his normal publishing responsibilities) by sending us a donation. Press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

• LEO WANTA: As you may recall, the Editor lent this operative $35,000 to extract him from what we diagnosed as fraudulent probation, due to expire on 28th November 2010. This action triggered the entire sequence of unravelling events that has followed. As a consequence, Wanta’s probation was duly shortened by five years, to expire on 14th November 2005. The private funds, which the Editor filched from the proceeds of the sale of our London house, should have been repaid on 11th June 2007 with interest, having been made available for a two-year term. The Editor has not been repaid, Mr Wanta has taken no steps to indicate to the Editor why this is the case, and has not written to explain the situation: so that, as a consequence, these funds are considered to have been stolen.

Furthermore, after the Editor made this platform available to assist Mr Wanta with his problems, he double-crossed us as revealed in our reports dated 3rd and 18th March 2008. Since then, we have had nothing whatsoever to do with this US operative. However on 6th May 2009, he took it into his head to circulate, without our permission, a copyrighted report that we published on the 18th April 2006. The Editor would like it to be known that we did not authorise the redistribution of this article and that Wanta is not permitted to steal our copyrighted works without prior permission. Should any further such breaches occur, we will reserve the right to add this further impertinence to the list of follies that this operative has committed against us, and will take measures to protect our rights.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

RELEASES TOOK PLACE ON 1ST MAY AS REQUIRED BY THE WRIT
On 1st May 2009, the necessary releases, delayed since time immemorial by the corruption of the highest US office-holders, intelligence cadres, banks and their foreign co-conspirators to defraud the rightful recipients, were paid into the Trustee accounts at the relevant US money center banks.

BUT THE CUSTODIAN BANKS HAVE SO FAR ILLEGALLY BLOCKED ACCESS TO THE FUNDS
It is now SIX days later, and the banks acting as custodians of the funds have failed to allow the Trustees into whose accounts the funds were paid, to access them – in gross, criminal breach of their fiduciary duty to enable the Trustees to take economic receipt of the funds for which they are responsible. The banks are therefore engaged in criminal obstruction of justice and terrorism.

FUNDS WERE PLACED IN THE TRUSTEES’ ACCOUNTS ON 1ST MAY
The released funds are ON THE BANKS’ BOOKS, which is the central point to bear in mind when assessing what follows. Instead of allowing the Trustees to handle their funds in accordance with instructions, the criminal enterprise banks are exploiting the existence of these funds that are now ON their books to generate new liquidity, on the working assumption that (a) they will not be held to account and (b) that the President of the United States and the Treasury Secretary will not enforce the law to bring an end to this criminal abuse and obstruction of justice.

THE WRIT HAS THEREFORE NOT BEEN FULLY EXECUTED
The World Court Writ of Execution raised by the Chinese parties and representatives of The Queen reportedly on behalf of the international community to bring an end to this American (and German) financial criminality has therefore not yet been fully enforced. The first stage – release of the funds into the Trustees’ accounts – took place as noted on 1st May 2009, thereby ‘compromising’ the war threat by the international community.

But the second stage, permitting use of the funds by the Trustees, had yet, as of this filing, to be implemented. The banks in question are custodians with fiduciary responsibility to the Trustees, and are required forthwith to place the funds live on their clients’ accounts. They have no latitude whatsoever to prevent their clients from using their funds as they see fit.

But that is not happening. Furthermore, this has been going on for the past six days.

WERE THE BANKS GIVEN PERMISSION TO ACT ILLEGALLY?
Because what they are all doing is ILLEGAL, it appears that the institutions may have been GIVEN PERMISSION TO ACT ILLEGALLY, which may implicate the US Treasury Secretary, Mr Timothy Geithner, and the President of the United States, Mr Barack Obama.

Mr Geithner can ORDER the banks to release the funds to the Trustees but, as of this posting, HE HAD NOT YET DONE SO. That means he is a co-conspirator in this OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

Why is this? Could he have been coerced? Could he have been bought off? The second possibility seems more likely, in view of the sudden appearance – out of context – of the following text at the foot of a report published by the operative Wayne Madsen on 5th May, which also mentioned the London ‘Safety Lock Box’ raids that took place on 2nd June 2008 that we have often referred to in these reports, since they ‘blew’ the geo-corruption linkages sky-high, and have triggered multiple dimensions of the unraveling process, as predicted:

‘Informed sources have told WMR (Wayne Madsen Report) that high-level rumors of a sex scandal involving the Treasury Secretary (Timothy Geithner) are swirling around both the Treasury and the Inter-American Development Bank, headquartered in Washington, DC’.

WARNING TO GEITHNER IN THE LIGHT OF THE ABOVE
Since Madsen is known to be an operative, we take this as a warning to Geithner that he is to be or is being blackmailed; and the reason for the appearance of this text out of context from the rest of the Madsen report dated 5th-6th May is that Geithner is allowing the banks to break the law and is obstructing justice – a not-so-subtle way of drawing to his attention the need for the US Treasury Secretary to reverse himself IMMEDIATELY and to order the banks to cease and desist from their illegal operations, obstruction of justice and abuse of their fiduciary duties.

OBAMA AND GEITHNER OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE AND PERPETRATING TERRORISM
More generally, since Geithner and relevant highest-level officials with the power to do so have NOT PREVENTED THE BANKS FROM ACTING ILLEGALLY, they are ALL OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE and are de facto co-conspirators in this FRAUD and breach of the Rule of Law. Therefore, they can be designated, like the criminal enterprise institutions concerned, as being themselves engaged in perpetrating financial and economic terrorism against the United States, the people of the United States and the Rest of the World, for which only the most severe measures are applicable.

Also obstructing justice and engaging in economic and financial terrorism, given their involvement in these matters, are Mrs Barbara Bush – who is stated by multiple sources to be handling Mr Bush Sr.’s affairs and interacting with the Pierce family given that Bush Sr.’s dementia is progressing fast (it is further advanced than is reported) and he has difficulty recognising his sources by name or face – Vice President Joseph Biden, William Jefferson Clinton and Mrs Hillary Rodomski Clinton.

(Having put his foot in it by stating that, given the ‘flu scare, he would not advise his family to travel on public transport, Biden made sure that cameras were on hand when he publicly appeared on 4th April at the Wilmington, Delaware, train station after riding Amtrak from Washington).

CRIMINAL FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES AND THEIR DIRECTORS
The criminal enterprise institutions that are acting illegally in breach of their fiduciary duties and obstructing justice in this respect are reported to us to include the following:

JPMorganChase, Deutsche Bank acting as clearing house for JPMorganChase, Citibank, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo.

The Directors of these institutions, being responsible to their Boards, are PERSONALLY liable along with their criminal enterprise firms, for the consequences of the crimes being committed, whether authorised by higher authority of not. That includes OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

Higher authority cannot ever authorise illegal activity – the overturning of the Rule of Law – with impunity. It may THINK it can, and the banks that are exploiting the fact that huge sums were placed ONTO THEIR BOOKS on 1st May 2009, may ASSUME that they are authorised to operate illegally, with impunity: but the price to be paid for this grotesque breach of their basic fiduciary duty and the parallel obstruction of justice will almost certainly turn out to be extremely high.

The Directors of these entities (1) are as follows:

Akamoto, Ross, Deutsche Bank AG
Al Thani, Nawaf, Deutsche Bank AG
Armstrong, C. Michael, Citigroup/Citibank
Asmarger, Regis, Deutsche Bank AG
Arzber, Thomas, Deutsche Bank AG
Augustine, Norman, Deutsche Bank AG
Baker II, John D., Wells Fargo
Barnet III, William, Bank of America
Belda, Alain J.P., Citigroup/Citibank
Binh, Pham, Deutsche Bank AG
Bock, Kurt, Deutsche Bank AG
Böhr, Wolfgang, Deutsche Bank AG
Borda, Kenneth, Deutsche Bank AG
Börsig, Clements, Deutsche Bank AG
Botelho, Mauricio, Deutsche Bank AG
Bowles, Crandall C., JPMorganChase
Bramble, Sr., Frank P., Bank of America
Braunstein, Jason, Deutsche Bank AG
Bryant, Charles, Deutsche Bank AG
Bryson, John, Deutsche Bank AG
Budzvna, John, Deutsche Bank AG
Burke, Stephen B., JPMorganChase
Capellas, Michael, Deutsche Bank AG
Cardoso, Fernando, Deutsche Bank AG
Cash Jr., James, Deutsche Bank AG
Casjens, Günther, Deutsche Bank AG
Chandler, Edward, Deutsche Bank AG
Chen, John S., Wells Fargo
Colbert, Virgis W., Bank of America
Collins, John T., Bank of America
Conroy, Kathryn, Deutsche Bank AG
Cote, David M. JPMorganChase
Countryman, Gary L., Bank of America
Crown, James S., JPMorganChase
Cunningham Keith, Deutsche Bank AG
Dean, Lloyd H., Wells Fargo
Deering, Anthony, Deutsche Bank AG
Deutch, John M., Citigroup/Citibank
Dimon, James, JPMorganChase
Dunham, Archie, Deutsche Bank AG
Eick, Karl-Erhard, Deutsche Bank AG
Fallon, Robert, Deutsche Bank AG
Förster, Heldrum, Deutsche Bank AG
Fortabat, Maria de, Deutsche Bank AG
Franks, Tommy R., Bank of America
Futter, Ellen V., JPMorganChase
Gifford, Charles K., Bank of America
Gray, III, William H., JPMorganChase
Griswold IV, Benjamin, Deutsche Bank AG
Grundhofer, Jerry A., Citigroup/Citibank
Guzman, Nicolas, Deutsche Bank AG
Hashimoto, Toru, Deutsche Bank AG
Herling, Alfred, Deutsche Bank AG
Hernandez, Jr., Enrique, Wells Fargo
Herzberg, Gerd, Deutsche Bank AG
Howell, William, Deutsche Bank AG
Idei, Nobuyuki, Deutsche Bank AG
Iglesias, Enrique, Deutsche Bank AG
Jackson, Jr., Laban P., JPMorganChase
James, Donald M., Wells Fargo
Jeffe, Robert, Deutsche Bank AG
Job, KBE, Peter, Deutsche Bank AG
Johnson, Robert, Deutsche Bank AG
Joss, Robert L., Wells Fargo
Kaden, Lewis B. Citigroup/Citibank
Kagermann, Henning, Deutsche Bank AG
Kangas, Edward, Deutsche Bank AG
Kappes, Hans-Peter, Deutsche Bank AG
Khan, Rafi, Deutsche Bank AG
Klee, Martina, Deutsche Bank AG
Kley, Karl-Ludwig, Deutsche Bank AG
Kovacevich, Richard M., Wells Fargo
Kuczynski, Pedro-Pablo, Deutsche Bank AG
Labarge, Suzanne, Deutsche Bank AG
Lee, Gang-Yon, Deutsche Bank AG
Lévy, Maurice, Deutsche Bank AG
Lewis, Kenneth D., Bank of America
Li, David, Deutsche Bank AG
Liveris, Andrew N., Citigroup/Citibank
Lozano, Monica C., Bank of America
Luengas, François, Deutsche Bank AG
Mark, Henriette, Deutsche Bank AG
Marram, Ellen, Deutsche Bank AG
Martin, Lynn, Deutsche Bank AG
Massey, Walter E., Bank of America
May, Robert, Deutsche Bank AG
May, Thomas J., Bank of America
McCormick, Richard D., Wells Fargo
McDonald, Mackey J., Wells Fargo
Mer, Francis, Deutsche Bank AG
Milligan, Cynthia H., Wells Fargo
Mitchell, Georgina, Deutsche Bank AG
Mitchell, Patricia E., Bank of America
Montova, Miguel, Deutsche Bank AG
Moore, Nicholas G., Wells Fargo
Mordashov, Aleksey, Deutsche Bank AG
Moriarty, Rich, Deutsche Bank AG
Mulcahy, Anne, Citigroup/Citibank
Neubart, Garrett, Deutsche Bank AG
Nocvak, David C., JPMorganChase
Oetker, August, Deutsche Bank AG
O’Neill, Michael E., Citigroup/Citibank
Pagani, Luis, Deutsche Bank AG
Pandit, Vikram, Citigroup/Citibank
Parsons, Richard D., Citigroup/Citibank
Pfeiffer, Eckhard, Deutsche Bank AG
Phelps, Michael, Deutsche Bank AG
Pina, Antonio, Deutsche Bank AG
Pischetsrieder, Bernd, Deutsche Bank AG
Platscher, Gabriele, Deutsche Bank AG
Prueher, Joseph W., Bank of America
Qingyuan, Li, Deutsche Bank AG
Quigley, Philip J., Wells Fargo
Ramadorai, S., Deutsche Bank AG
Raymond, Lee R., JPMorganChase
Rhodes, Bill, Citigroup/Citibank
Ricciardi, Lawrence R., Citigroup/Citibank
Rice, Donald B., Wells Fargo
Rodin, Judith, Citigroup/Citibank
Rogowski, Michael, Deutsche Bank AG
Rossotti, Charles O., Bank of America
Ruck, Karin, Deutsche Bank AG
Runstad, Judith M., Wells Fargo
Ryan, Charles, Deutsche Bank AG
Ryan, Robert L., Citigroup/Citibank
Ryan, Thomas M., Bank of America
Sada, Armando, Deutsche Bank AG
Samuelsson, Hakan, Deutsche Bank AG
Sanger. Stephen W., Wells Fargo
Santomero, Anthony M., Citigroup/Citibank
Schaeffer, Maria-Elisabeth, Deutsche Bank AG
Siegert, Theo, Deutsche Bank AG
Sloan Jr, O. Temple, Bank of America
Snow, John, Deutsche Bank AG
Steel, Robert K., Wells Fargo
Stumpf, John G., Wells Fargo
Svenson, Susan G., Wells Fargo
Tan, Keng Yamc, Deutsche Bank AG
Teyssen, Johannes, Deutsche Bank AG
Thieme, Marlehn, Deutsche Bank AG
Thompson, Jr., William S., Citigroup/Citibank
Thumann, Jürgen, Deutsche Bank AG
Tillman, Robert L., Bank of America
Todenhöfer, Tilman, Deutsche Bank AG
Toth, Devin, Deutsche Bank AG
Unuvar, Ahmet, Deutsche Bank AG
Urrutia, Miguel, Deutsche Bank AG
Volk, Stephen, Citigroup/Citibank
Wanandi, Sofjan, Deutsche Bank AG
Ward, Jackie M., Bank of America
Weatherill, Lucas, Deutsche Bank AG
Weldon, William C., JPMorganChase
Wenning, Werner, Deutsche Bank AG
Wolfe, Louis, Deutsche Bank AG
Wunderlich, Leo, Deutsche Bank AG
Yunling, Zhang, Deutsche Bank AG
Zetsche, Dieter, Deutsche Bank AG
Zhang, Lee, Deutsche Bank AG

ENFORCEMENT TEAM CONTINUING ITS NECESSARY WORK
The enforcement team headed by Swiss personnel cooperating with foreign government cadres to enforce execution of the World Court’s Writ of Execution continues, we understand, to deploy all means available to procure compliance with the Writ of Execution. Arrests and ‘neutralisations’ have continued unabated for the past several weeks.

Since the enforcement team is NOT free to leave the job half done – as discussed in the preceding report, failure to execute the Writ of Execution is not an option for the team’s members: otherwise they themselves will become co-conspirators in the obstruction of justice – this heightened crisis environment will continue until resolution.

Logic would therefore suggest that ALL Directors of the criminal enterprise institutions engaged in this fraudulent tapping of the paid-in funds, breach of fiduciary duty and obstruction of justice are vulnerable to whatever measures the enforcement team unilaterally decides to take in order to fulfil its instructions and to procure completion of its allotted task – which means compelling these very arrogant and recalcitrant institutions and their Directors, to meet their fiduciary obligations.

THE CRIMINAL BANKS HAVE NO EXCUSE THIS TIME
In the past, criminalist officials and bankers have enjoyed playing the disinformation game of ‘it’s not my fault’: but this option is precluded now because the institutions concerned are all overtly engaged in maximising the accruals to be leveraged off the funds that are sitting on their books in the Trustees’ accounts, which is illegal. The big US banks are in gross breach of standard banking conduct, which means that, as we have often argued in the past, they cannot be trusted to carry out instructions – which further means that anyone dealing with the identified giga-institutions may be risking the loss of control over any funds they handle.

Moreover by depriving the countries and Trustees of their rightful funds while these banks pursue their own selfish interests and obstruction of justice contrary to their fiduciary duty to their clients, the banks have reconfirmed that they are indeed criminal enterprises.

And by condoning this latest appalling breach of banking standards, the Rule of Law, and of trust, President Obama, George Bush 41 and Mrs Barbara Bush et al are active participants in blocking the releases and in obstructing justice – a state of affairs that reflects a reckless degree of risk-taking arrogance that the Rest of the World has come to associate with the pariah nation called the United States of America, and which is liable to lead to a progressive degradation of international relations in the context of open economic warfare built on a substructure of the red-hot internal and external intelligence war which is in turn reflected in the irresponsible lies and diversionary reports churned out by notorious US controlled disinformation outlets.

NOW WE KNOW WHY THE TRUSTEES WERE ABUSED ALL WEEKEND
The foregoing throws new light on why the Trustees were kept at the banks from Friday 1st May through to Monday 4th May, when, as previously reported, a shoot-out occurred, killing two Federal officers. These tensions erupted because instead of allowing the Trustees to access their funds in accordance with their fiduciary obligations, the corrupt banks blocked access and embarked upon another round of exotic financing operations using the money that was now sitting ON THEIR BOOKS as base. In other words, when the releases finally occurred, they ‘pulled another one’.

As noted above, they must have been told that they could proceed to break the law; and this clearance to act illegally could ONLY have come from the highest levels. But as we all know, compliance with an illegal order does not absolve the perpetrator from responsibility at all. The banks that are acting illegally and are obstructing justice are legally as well as criminally liable.

THE AIR FORCE ONE EPISODE OVER MANHATTAN
The episode involving one of the Air Force One planes over Manhattan on 27th April now turns out to have been far more serious than has hitherto been explained, and can be read several ways, including the possibility that it may reflect a deep schism in the bowels of the US official structures.

Although F-16s always take up the lock-on position at the tail of the target aircraft, it is also true that when the fighter aircraft is directly on the tail of a target plane, that is a military position for a shoot-down. If the F-16’s Stinger missile had been released, the US President’s aircraft would have been destroyed. (There were in fact two F-16s present),

If that assumption is correct, the reason for the extraordinary manoeuvres of the Air Force One may have been that the presidential plane had to fly close to the buildings where the warmth emitted from the windows could interfere with the Stinger missile, which is heat-seeking.

On this analysis, the presidential plane shown in the videos was being lined up to be shot down by one of the F-16s, which, by extrapolation may have been given actual instructions to destroy the presidential plane unless it returned to the Washington area. The intention had been for the plane to land at LaGuardia Airport.

Although President Obama was reported to be elsewhere in the country on 27th April, he is known to have a double, thought to be a brother, who is slightly darker but can be ‘touched up’ with the application of those careful make-up skills deployed by the specialists hired from Hollywood for this purpose (see earlier posting). According to an unconfirmed report, it is possible that the purpose of the flight of the plane from the Air Force One fleet was for Obama secretly to attend a meeting at Citibank at which George H. W. Bush Sr. was thought to be present. Any such meeting would have needed to take place at the bank.

In which case, to take this hypothesis to its logical conclusion, the interception of Air Force One by an armed and primed US F-16 which actually locked-on to the tail of the presidential plane ready to shoot the plane down if it did not conform with the F-16’s instructions, provides empirical evidence of something being seriously wrong at the heart of the US structures, of the order of a colossal breach between warring elements – all over the money, of course.

Even though F-16s always ‘tailgate’ like this in such circumstances, the F-16’s behaviour conforms to classic military manoeuvres, indicating at the very least here that the ‘PR pictures’ report was a spurious and feeble, albeit brazen, cover story.

There is probably a link, too, to the shoot-out that occurred in the morning of 27th April, after the country representatives had been abused all weekend long, as discussed in our report dated 29th April – again, over money, or rather the blocking of the Trustees’ access by the banks.

An alternative hypothesis would be that the episode had something to do with shoulder-mounted missiles, some of which are of Russian origin, that were reported to have been brought into New Jersey, home of the seething US component of the Russian mafiya, who ‘want to be paid’ like the Chicago elements as well. On 12th August 2008, 3 men were arrested, one at Newark and two in New York, on suspicion of seeking to procure missiles for launching against US airliners.

That the episode on 27th April may have been related to the known concern over shoulder-fired missiles sounds less far-fetched when we recall the incident earlier this year of the scheduled flight that landed in the Hudson River without loss of life. The videos show that the two engines were damaged in a manner that could not possibly have been achieved by a bird-strike – the story that was quickly peddled to cover up what actually happened – which may have been that the plane was immobilised by one or more shoulder-launched missiles. The video showed a black SUV racing along the side of the river as the plane ‘landed’ on the water. In other words, a message may have been sent by the Russian mafiya that they expect to be paid, or nastier things will start happening.

THE CURIOUS MATTER OF THE BRIEFCASE UNDER THE TABLE
Sources who attended a very recent ‘conservative’ dinner meeting in Washington, DC, at which General John Singlaub, Ross Perot and General Petraeus were prominently on display, reported to us that a certain operative spent the dinner suddenly leaving the table to ‘conduct some business’, returning, vanishing again, and then finally disappearing altogether, during the event. On arrival at the dinner, the spook had brought a briefcase which he slid under the table where he was seated.

When, finally, this agitated individual left altogether and didn’t return, it was later found that his briefcase was still where he had left it under the table. Our sources advise that it was decided to open the briefcase. It contained nothing at all, with the exception of a bottle of liquid. Research reveals that the operative concerned is a distinguished US counterterrorism official and a sniper.

‘WEAPONISED PNEUMONIC OR BUBONIC PLAGUE’
A retired US Army medical expert advises that our first-hand report from Mexico City [1st May 2009 posting] implied to her that the outbreak appeared to involve Weaponised Pneumonic Plague. The Merck Manual states that it has a 2-3-day incubation period, followed by the abrupt onset of high fever, chills, tachycardia, and often severe headache. Coughing, not prevalent initially, develops within 20 to 24 hours. Sputum is mucoid at first, rapidly shows red blood specks, and then becomes uniformly pink (blood). Most untreated patients die within 48 hours after the onset of symptoms.

The authoritative source elaborated:

‘The only way they could have done this would have been using the advance preparatory team that arrives before the POTUS. The team would never have been suspected. Mexico City is the perfect medium for this purpose, having a high concentration of people (over 20 million++), poverty, lousy sanitation and health, and the stagnant air pollution that overhangs the city. I would suspect that the advance prep team would also have been required to check out the top of all the highest and medium-sized buildings (for likely sniper positions). They would have used the tallest buildings and worked their way to street level in order to gain maximum saturation so as to obtain the highest kill ratio, given the dense smog and pollution and heavy population density. They would most probably have used the exhaust systems and would have placed aerosolised delivery systems within them – all set with timers, of course. They would have to have been present in order to release the plague. The entire presidential team would have been on antibiotics so as not to arouse anyone’.

‘Yersinia pestis (Bubonic Plague, or Black Death, which is still found in rodents in the southwestern United States): who would suspect it? It is not the ‘flu. The ‘flu that is (or was) spreading across the United States could simply be a cover. They should spread out and try to find the delivery systems. These people are murderous and very evil, and extremely stupid. They are not the sharpest tools in the shed. They have to find the delivery systems before these operatives attempt to retrieve them’.

‘Bubonic plague involves the lymph nodes and severe swelling, whereas pneumonic plague is a variant but does not involve the lymph nodes so it is usually misdiagnosed, and is very deadly’.

Marc S. Griswold, a former Secret Service agent who was serving as the lead advance special agent for the US Energy Secretary, Stephen Chu, during the trip to Mexico in mid-April, and who travelled with President Barack Obama on his visit, confirmed in early May that the minor cough he contracted in Mexico developed into Swine ‘Flu. The agent’s close family members are among nine probable cases that were reported on 1st May to have emerged in Maryland, Another was a World Bank official who had recently travelled to Mexico.

Although Griswold recovered and was reportedly back at work at the beginning of May, the agent said that his illness severely strained his relationship with his brother; while his daughter, who was not infected, had to endure stares and mean jokes as rumours spread through her school about her father’s rôle in bringing the first cases of Swine ‘Flu to the region. Close friends were refusing to talk to him, after it was realized that he had infected his nephew and other family members.

Of course the real explanation for these reactions was suspicion that Griswold may have been one of the agents involved in releasing what may have been a Weaponised Biowarfare Agent.

As previously reported, samples of agents went missing from the US Army Medical Command’s operation at Fort Detrick, MD. Specifically, on 22nd April, US Army criminal investigators were reported by The Frederick News-Post to be looking into the removal of disease samples from the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases. The investigators are from the US Army Criminal Investigation Unity at Fort Meade.

Fort Detrick (USAMRID) is the US Army’s leading biodefence laboratory, where researchers study pathogens, such as Ebola, anthrax and plague. In February, USAMRID halted all its research into these and other diseases, following discovery of virus samples that weren’t listed in its inventory.

The Institute’s Commander, Colonel John Skvorak, ordered the halting of research while experts conducted a complete inventory of the Institute’s agents, which was not yet complete in late April when this information first surfaced.

FORMER U.S. HIGH OFFICIALS CONTINUE RUNNING ‘BLACK OPS’
Evil operatives and holders of high office like Richard B. Cheney, who is certainly involved in the present situation, are known to continue operations with which they were involved while in office. They believe they are entitled to carry on seamlessly with whatever they were doing or controlling before. This is the origin of the adage that there is no such thing as a ‘former’ operative. Cheney is thought to have ‘split’ from the Bushes since leaving office,

In addition, these people are operatives first, and holders of high office second: so the reason that they carry on seamlessly with their ‘Black Ops’ is really that ‘this is what they do’.

It is clear that George Bush Sr. is/was capable of anything, including crimes against humanity: after all, he was personally responsible, for instance, for the deployment of chemical weapons against the civilian population of Halabja, Iraq, in 1992, a horrific and unrequited crime against humanity.

There is little doubt that the reason, or a key reason, why Bush Sr. and probably former President Clinton, who ‘works for’ or ‘worked for’ George H. W.Bush Sr., remained ‘untouched’ despite the immense crimes that they have committed, was that they have all along been blackmailing the US Government by letting it be known that if crossed, they would be prepared to adopt ‘exceptional measures’, not excluding crimes against humanity. If the US structures were influenced by this hideous blackmail, they failed to understand that the blackmailer is in a weaker position than the blackmailee – since once the blackmailer has used his ‘weapon’, he is powerless. Which may very well now be the case with Bush Sr., a man as evil and dangerous as Adolf Hitler (Schickelgruber).

The good news is that Bush Sr’s. dementia is proceeding rapidly. The bad news is that Mrs Barbara Bush is reported to be intermeddling in Bush Sr.’s Fraudulent Finance affairs. The further very bad news is that Jeb Bush has been wheeled in to carry on where Mr Bush Sr. may be on the verge of leaving off. A former employee at Jeb Bush’s private residence in Florida revealed some time ago that the Jeb Bush home was encased in an aura of satanic evil.

WILD REPORTS BY ANONYMOUS UNPROVENANCED SOURCES
Wild reports from unprovenanced, anonymous US sources which cannot be trusted because the sources conceal their identities and co-ordinates, can be dismissed as consisting of the usual toxic mixture of fact and falsehood. As for the suggestion by an identified source that ‘Internet reports’ may contain disinformation, we object to being bracketed with cowards who post anonymously and therefore cannot be held accountable for what they publish.

And since the object of the exercise is to extract truth from the dense fog of disinformation and lies spewed out by the controlled outlets, it is inevitable that, from time to time, information may turn out to be unreliable. Few can avoid being deceived by these ‘Black Ops’ people sometimes.

But when other sources pick up our feeds, as has happened repeatedly recently, you can be reasonably sure that what we have reported first is accurate ‘to the best of our knowledge and belief’ at the time of reporting. Finally, on this subject, we do not read the anonymous sources.

On one issue reported to us as having been featured in such sources, we do have a constructive observation to make. It is known that much top-secret US military technology has been transferred, during and since the Clinton era, to the Chinese. The motivation for this TREASON, we suggest, is that since the United States (due to the corruption of its structures and top officials) could not pay the Chinese what was owed to them, high-tech US secrets in breach of US national security were handed over IN LIEU OF PAYMENT. This may have happened on several occasions, we suspect.

OUTGOING BRITISH M.E.P. BLASTS THE SHAM EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
During the almost (typically) empty final plenary session of the European Parliament before the European ‘elections’ in June, the Editor’s friend, Ashley Mote, Independent MEP for Southeast England, attempted to sum up, in the one minute allotted for such speeches in the rubber-stamp European Soviet (sorry, ‘Parliament’), what he thinks of that deliberate travesty of democracy.

This is what he said to the European Soviet on 4th May 2009:

‘Over the last five years I have watched in horror the EU’s endless, scandalous, institutionalised looting of taxpayers’ money’.

‘I have watched in horror an already overcrowded UK being deluged by hundreds of thousands of uninvited foreign workers who arrived for their benefit and to claim our welfare’.

‘I have watched in close-up a legislative system which permits anonymous bureaucrats to generate so-called law without any regard for the damage they do to the British economy and businesses’.

‘I have watched in close-up this expensive, ineffectual talking shop of a ‘Parliament’ masquerading as an illusion of accountable democracy – a monstrous deceit on the electors who sent us here’.

‘President Gorbachëv was right (2). The EU is the old Soviet Union, dressed in Western clothes. One day you will realise that you cannot be masters in someone’ else’s house’.

As usual, the few socialists and ideological federalists waiting their turn to speak tried to shout Mr Mote down, without any intervention from the Chairman, of course.

In doing so, they indicated that, as usual, Mr Mote had struck a few nerves.

Notes:

(1) The Directors of the named institutions were collated from the criminal enterprises’ websites on 6th May 2009. In each case, the name of the main institution is indicated only.

(2) This information reflects a comment made by Gorbachëv (real name Orbach, or Korbach) on a visit to London in March 2001.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. Some versions have a ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

FAILING SETTLEMENT 1ST MAY, IT’S WAR, G-10 WARNS

G-10 DEADLINE ACCOMPANIED BY CONFIRMED THREAT OF WARFARE

Friday 1 May 2009 20:00

NATURE OF THREATENED WAR UNSPECIFIED, BUT THE THREAT IS CONFIRMED

• 1ST MAY IS THE DEADLINE SET BY G-10 AND WORLD COURT, BEYOND WHICH EXTREMELY SEVERE CONSEQUENCES WILL ENSUE IN THE EVENT OF FURTHER PAYMENTS SABOTAGE

• FURTHER ARRESTS/’REMOVALS’ OF CRIMINAL FINANCIERS REPORTED

• ‘THE PENALTY FOR NON-COMPLIANCE WILL BE WAR’

• AMERICANS AND WORLD TO BE PUNISHED FOR THE CORRUPTION

• BIO-WARFARE AGENTS MISSING FROM FORT DETRICK

• THE VIRUS APPEARS TO BE MAN-MADE

• INSERTED ADDITIONAL SECTION: SWINE ‘FLU REPORT FROM MEXICO CITY

• MALICIOUS MESSAGES RECEIVED BY THIS SERVICE

• DALLAS-BASED ALDUS EQUITY SCAM EXPOSED

• ANOTHER ‘SUICIDE’ REPORTED: CLINTON-ERA AIDE & ATTORNEY

• NON-COINCIDENTAL SUDDEN RETIREMENT OF JUSTICE SOUTER

• Operating the $ Refunding from London without US Government participation delivers:

(1) Massive ongoing windfall tax accruals to the BRITISH Treasury given that all funds resident in the United Kingdom jurisdiction for 24 hours are taxable by the Inland Revenue. This makes the UK Refunding proposal of extreme interest to Her Majesty’s Government and the UK Treasury.

((2) Massive ongoing windfall benefits to the UNITED STATES Treasury given that it will also receive a cascade of tax accruals from this independent private sector Refunding Program.

(3) The necessary refinancing of the UK and US banking systems ON THE BOOKS with no input from either Government and NO CORRESPONDING DEBT CREATED IN THE BACKGROUND.

(4) GOOD (i.e., on-balance sheet, taxed) money which will CHASE OUT THE BAD MONEY that the crass US Fraudulent Finance concoction will generate.

• In mid-March we published: International Currency Review Volume 34, #2 on Systemic Fraudulent Finance and The Legalisation of Financial Corruption. Also published recently are issues of our titles The Latin American Times, Economic Intelligence Review, London Currency Report, Interest Rate Service and Arab-Asian Affairs.

• For details, see the second white panel on the Home Page.

• To subscribe to our intelligence services, see the catalogue under World Reports Limited.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice is comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor’s study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the Internet Security Solution software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

• DONATIONS: You can help finance these exposures (which the Editor has to prepare on top of his normal publishing responsibilities) by sending us a donation. Press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

1ST MAY IS THE DEADLINE SET BY G-10 AND WORLD COURT, BEYOND WHICH EXTREMELY SEVERE CONSEQUENCES WILL ENSUE IN THE EVENT OF FURTHER PAYMENTS SABOTAGE
It is confirmed that 1st May 2009 (May Day, Feast of the World Revolution) is the absolute deadline set by the Group of Ten and the World Court, via its Writ of Execution, for total compliance by the President of the United States and associates for completion of the Settlements.

We understand that the situation has deteriorated sharply since the previous two reports were posted, given the defiant, Bush-like behaviour attributed to President Obama who was reported to have stated on 30th April that he will never allow the releases. The source of this statement has been traced to George H. W. Bush Sr., the head of the snake.

The snake is now engaged in open blackmail against the US Government, the American people and the Rest of the World, and appears to have unleashed one of the blackmail weapons (Swine ‘Flu) which appear to have been held in readiness all along to provide the Bush-Clinton-CIA-DVD crime apparat with protection enabling them to continue ransacking our financial resources with impunity.

In an astonishing ‘in-your-face’ display of open defiance, former criminal US President George H. W. Bush and former criminal US President William Jefferson Clinton, né Rockefeller, are featured co-speakers at the 16th Annual Salvation Army William Booth Society Benefit Dinner to be held on 2nd May at the BOK Center, Tulsa, OK. That will be convenient for the US Gold Badges, or the World Court enforcement team, or both, as these arch-criminals can both be arrested there in a single operation. If they don’t appear, no doubt appropriate action will be seen to have been taken.

• But don’t sit on the edge of your seat in anticipation.

FURTHER ARRESTS AND ‘REMOVALS’ OF CRIMINAL FINANCIERS REPORTED
The enforcement team responsible to the World Court, for whom even partial failure to enforce the requirements of the Writ is not an option, not least because they themselves will then be arrested for obstruction of justice, are reported to have arrested an unknown number of criminal finance operatives in North America since arriving in the United States on Monday. Further information is scarce, but the encouraging implication is that a degree of progress has been made. Nor would it appear that ‘arrests’ are the sole option being employed: see below. ‘Removals’, too.

‘THE PENALTY FOR NON-COMPLIANCE WILL BE WAR’
The international community of aggrieved Governments represented by the G-10 and the World Court have indicated, via the enforcement team that has been present in the United States since Monday [see report dated 29th April], that the penalties for non-compliance and further defiance by the United States and the high-level criminal group will be extremely severe: and when we queried what that meant, the response was: WAR.

We conveyed this assessment, obtained from impeccable sources, to separate, equally impeccable, sources within the ‘structures’ at about 8:15pm New York time on 30th April. At about 11:20am on Friday, 1st May, when the Editor asked what response had been obtained, he was advised that the foregoing information is authoritatively CONFIRMED. Which is why this is being published.

AMERICANS AND WORLD TO BE PUNISHED FOR THE CORRUPTION
In other words, failing resolution today, 1st May 2009, the international financial and global trading systems will be liable to be severely degraded and war preparations will be accelerated, or worse.

Thus the American people, and the Rest of the World, will be punished for the corrupt behaviour of past and present holders of the highest political offices and their conspiratorial pocket attorneys, bankers, intelligence deviants and others who have been perpetrating economic and financial terrorism against the American people and the Rest of the World, and appear to have launched a bio-warfare attack against them as well, from part of their blackmail armoury.

Having deployed this weapon, the danger is that this criminal group will escalate their terrorist activities, as they struggle IN VAIN to hold on to the trillions they have stolen (which as noted in the preceding report, have been or are being retrieved).

BIO-WARFARE AGENTS MISSING FROM FORT DETRICK
Three weeks ago, bio-warfare agents reportedly went missing from the US Army Medical Command laboratories at Fort Detrick, Maryland. Coupled with the fact that a member of Mr Obama’s specialist Homeland Security team sent out in advance of the President’s visit to Mexico was reported by The Washington Post on 29th April to have contracted swine ’flu, it is clear that the dissemination of the virus is a deliberate act of terrorism and biological warfare perpetrated by criminal elements within the US Government’s structures – a state of affairs so serious that President Obama will be unable to explain this one away, with or without his teleprompter.

This development may well have contributed to the hard line adopted by the G-10 financial powers, although the primary consideration here is revulsion at the United States’ endlessly criminal and fraudulent behaviour over payment of the Settlements, with this process being driven by the expiry of the 30-day period believed to be specified in the World Court’s Writ of Execution.

• A specialist source commenting on the ‘Pig ‘Flu’ operation, advises as follows:

THE VIRUS APPEARS TO BE MAN-MADE
This Swine ‘Flu is not a naturally-occurring event, but instead is an Advanced Biological Warfare recombination-DNA-genetically-engineered virus. Young healthy adults seem to be the most at risk. This virus is genetically spliced off the 1918 Spanish ‘Flu.

The New Mexican Swine ‘Flu has elements of DNA from the following: avian ‘flu, human ‘flu Type A, human ‘flu Type B, Asian swine ‘flu, and European swine ‘flu: a strange combination never seen before and having less than 1/10% chance of being a natural event.

Figure the odds on human and animal viruses from four or more continents suddenly recombining into a new ‘flu, during a non-‘flu season, that spreads from human-to-human with a 10% estimated prospective fatality rating?

This new ‘flu is a lab-created Advanced Biological Warfare DNA genetically engineered virus, and it appears to have been deliberately released. This event is an Advanced Biological Warfare event. It is far more important than 9/11, and, by itself, could bring deaths in such magnitudes as to exceed the number of deaths from all causes in the Second World War.

That is the end of the advisory.

INSERTED ADDITIONAL SECTION: SWINE ‘FLU REPORT FROM MEXICO CITY
The following responsible report from a source in Mexico City, dated 28th April, is appended. The original report was written in Spanish:

‘Surely you are all informed of the national flu epidemic that we are experiencing. My aunt works at the Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion and has just called on the telephone to inform that it is NOT a flu epidemic, it is a virus that is suspended in the environment and is HIGHLY DANGEROUS.

The origin has not been determined, but the symptoms are a general feeling of not being well, aching body, painful headaches, eye irritation with a burning sensation. These symptoms present themselves in one or two days and then are accompanied by much pain in one or both lungs.

In the Instituto, in addition to innumerable patient deaths, 10 doctors have also died, and 2 other young doctors of age 25, are hospitalized. The hospital Juarez (one of the largest in Mexico City) is closed and under quarantine. It is such a bad virus that if not attended to as an emergency in one or two days, it has been DEADLY IN ALL CASES. Medical doctors suppose that it is a mutation of the avian flu because of its characteristics.

It is given that the Government does not want to give out this information so as not to create a panic; however, it is a panic in reality. Classes have been suspended, the President cancelled his tour. This does not happen unless it is something highly important’. [END OF MEXICAN REPORT].

• Editor’s comment: Since it is a certainty that this virus is indeed Advanced Biological Warfare, criminal cadres within the US official structures appear to be engaged in mass murder with a view to implementation of one of the most satanic objectives of these Illuminati criminals: population reduction. This madness arises from the FALSE ASSUMPTION that the resources of the earth are finite, in line with the incessant propaganda to that effect in recent years, which is NOT TRUE. In Scripture, the children of Israel were allowed and encouraged to multiply ‘as the sand that is by the sea shore’. This is a Luciferian attack, typical of the Himmlerian mentality of these demoniacs. We need to be clear that these criminals are mass murderers. Just like their Nazi antecedents.

MALICIOUS MESSAGES RECEIVED BY THIS SERVICE
Since February 2008, the Editor has been at the receiving end of odious ‘Black’ voicemail and email messages from a cadre of mental defectives calling themselves the ‘Great Dark Lords’, who have repeatedly rejoiced at the very prospect of, and have predicted, the grim circumstances reported above. A large number of these emails and voicemail messages have been retained for evidential purposes. In addition, the Editor periodically receives communications, without coordinates, from mentally deranged US intel operatives, calling the Editor ‘disreputable’, or else, in the case of a notorious webmaster, ‘a sorcerer’! These evil messages are all collected and held in a file so that when these events have finally run their course, a proper accounting of the sources of lies, hate propaganda and disinformation can be published. In the interim, the point to bear in mind is that these people never imagined there would ever be any opposition to their Luciferian schemes. These may have been accelerated due to the exposures.

However, the reality is that their demented operations have been thrown into absolute disarray, the perpetrators are at each others’ throats and have been stealing stolen money from others, and then stealing it back, in a free-for-all environment of ‘Black’ chaos that has continued for years and is now being exposed as it unravels before our eyes and theirs. This process appears to be slow at times, but jerks forwards in sudden, encouraging leaps.

DALLAS-BASED ALDUS EQUITY SCAM EXPOSED
The latest US scamming operation to have surfaced concerns Aldus Equity, a Dallas, TX-based firm, which was charged on 30th April by the Securities and Exchange Commission with violations of the securities llegislation [see below], as part of what the SEC has described as ‘a multimillion dollar kickback scheme involving New York’s largest pension fund’. The founder of Aldus Equity, Mr Saul Meyer, 38, was arraigned in New York at Manhattan Criminal Court, and was bailed on $200,000 bail.

The New York Attorney General, Andrew M. Cuomo, said in a teleconference on 30th April that his investigation, which is still continuing, had uncovered what amounts to a far-reaching conspiracy involving politicians, professional investors and consultants to defraud public pension funds in New York and other US States by paying millions of dollars in kickbacks in exchange for access to the funds, so that investment firms could manage elements of the funds and reap lucrative fees.

Mr Cuomo elaborated: ‘I believe we are disclosing a national network of actors who often acted in concert and did this all across the country. It’s an ongoing investigation, and I would say: “Stay tuned”’. The Director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office, James Clarkson, added: ‘Aldus was chosen by the pension plan(s) because of Aldus’s willingness to illegally line the pockets of others’.

This case has connections to corruption in California and the State of New Mexico. Significantly, Deutsche Bank held a minority stake in Aldus at one stage.

• Note, finally, and without surprise, that the operation was run out of Dallas.

ANOTHER ‘SUICIDE’ REPORTED: CLINTON-ERA AIDE & ATTORNEY
Mark Levy, a Clinton-era aide, was reported on Thursday 30th April to have ‘committed suicide’ at his Washington Law Office, a branch of Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, based in Atlanta. Helen Andrews, of the Washington, DC, Police Department, said that officers were called to the firm’s office building to investigate a shooting that occurred on Thursday morning. Investigators have been saying it was a suicide. But in reality, Levy was ‘suicided’.

Levy attended the Yale University law school with both Clintons and worked on fundraising for Mrs Clinton’s presidential campaign, according to Dennis Gingold, an attorney who was working with Mark Levy on a case at the law firm in Washington.

As indicated in our report dated 29th April, the World Court enforcement team are empowered to use all measures necessary to enforce the requirements of the international community on behalf of the aggrieved Governments.

NON-COINCIDENTAL SUDDEN RETIREMENT OF JUSTICE SOUTER
Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter, appointed by criminal President George H. W. Bush in 1990, has suddenly announced his retirement, although the ‘spin’ has it that he had often spoken of his discontent in Washington and of an intention to retire. However the timing is significant.

• Justice Souter appears to have ‘got the point’.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. Some versions have a ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

WORLD COURT ENFORCEMENT TEAM IN U.S. THIS WEEK

SWINE ‘FLU = BLACKMAIL OP. DROPPED BY OBAMA TEAM IN MEXICO

Thursday 30 April 2009 21:37

• WORLD COURT ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL ARRIVE IN U.S.

• STATE OF EXTREME, UNPRECEDENTED GLOBAL TENSION

• SPLIT WITHIN THE RANKS OF THE WORKERS OF DARKNESS

• ENFORCEMENT OF THE WORLD COURT’S WRIT IS MANDATORY

• TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS STOLEN BY BUSH 41 AND 43 RETRIEVED

• OBAMA WHITE HOUSE ADVANCE TEAM RESPONSIBLE FOR ‘FLU OUTBREAK?

• CRIMINALS OPERATING INSIDE THE U.S. GOVERNMENT ARE WAGING BIO-TERRORISM AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND THE REST OF THE WORLD FOR SELF-ENRICHMENT

• DISINFORMATION SPREAD BY U.S. LAW ENFORCEMENT

• POSTSCRIPT: MORE ON OBAMA’S REMOVAL OF JESUS SYMBOL

• Operating the $ Refunding from London without US Government participation delivers:

(1) Massive ongoing windfall tax accruals to the BRITISH Treasury given that all funds resident in the United Kingdom jurisdiction for 24 hours are taxable by the Inland Revenue. This makes the UK Refunding proposal of extreme interest to Her Majesty’s Government and the UK Treasury.

((2) Massive ongoing windfall benefits to the UNITED STATES Treasury given that it will also receive a cascade of tax accruals from this independent private sector Refunding Program.

(3) The necessary refinancing of the UK and US banking systems ON THE BOOKS with no input from either Government and NO CORRESPONDING DEBT CREATED IN THE BACKGROUND.

(4) GOOD (i.e., on-balance sheet, taxed) money which will CHASE OUT THE BAD MONEY that the crass US Fraudulent Finance concoction will generate.

• In mid-March we published: International Currency Review Volume 34, #2 on Systemic Fraudulent Finance and The Legalisation of Financial Corruption. Also published recently are issues of our titles The Latin American Times, Economic Intelligence Review, London Currency Report, Interest Rate Service and Arab-Asian Affairs.

• For details, see the second white panel on the Home Page.

• To subscribe to our intelligence services, see the catalogue under World Reports Limited.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice is comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor’s study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the Internet Security Solution software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

• DONATIONS: You can help finance these exposures (which the Editor has to prepare on top of his normal publishing responsibilities) by sending us a donation. Press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

WORLD COURT ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL ARRIVE IN U.S.
At 1:50pm on Thursday 30th April we established that a contingent of heavy-duty enforcement personnel reporting to and representing the World Court and the Group of Ten financial powers have been operating in the United States since Monday 27th April. Their duty is to enforce the requirements of a writ, believed to have been dated 1st April, immediately ahead of the Group of Twenty (G-20) meeting in Canning Town, London, on 2nd April 2009, and which would have been deposited with the Meeting and served on President Obama in particular.

This may have been the origin of the story that Obama wouldn’t be attending the G-20 Meeting, and would be visiting the Tower of London instead, as a tourist – the cynical purpose of this tale being to signal to the foreign governments concerned that Obama wasn’t about to make himself available to accept service of the writ.

After second thoughts, presumably his arrogant entourage would have advised him: ‘Not to worry, you needn’t pay attention. Let them serve the writ’ (speculation on our part).

• Furthermore, we have just been told that President Obama is blocking the Settlements and that he himself has no intention of ever allowing them to occur. However this has been authoritatively dismissed as Bush Sr. disinformation propaganda, although it HAS become known that Mr Obama takes his orders directly from Bush Sr. Somehow, we DO NOT THINK THIS IS A VIABLE SITUATION.

Obama is also cited as having told the World Court that it is bought and paid for, so he needn’t pay attention to what it requires. By the same token, Obama is also authoritatively said to have told the Congress that it, too, is bought and paid for.

• However, again, our sources state emphatically that the appropriate law enforcement cadres DO NOT CONCUR, and that the Settlements WILL HAPPEN, and this this obstruction will be overcome.

From what we understand, a lot of very prominent people are in for a rude awakening.

STATE OF EXTREME, UNPRECEDENTED TENSION
For the situation has now reached a pitch of extreme tension, given that execution of the writ requires its demands to have been met by 1st May – which is of course the Feast of Beltane, the Number One World Revolution esoteric date, when misled, brainwashed nutcases dressed up as Druids assemble at Stonehenge to worship the devil, or figments of their own imaginations, while deluded revolutionary cadres around the world celebrate ‘the onward march of the Revolution’.

SPLIT WITHIN THE RANKS OF THE WORKERS OF DARKNESS
But what we are witnessing is of course a massive split within the ranks of the demented Luciferian protagonists of revolutionary action through corruption, because, since the Devil is the author of all lies and confusion, these people are all at loggerheads with each other in multiple dimensions – having, of course, been stealing money from each other and perpetrating grotesque abuses which not even their own evil allies can tolerate.

This will explain why, paradoxically, the sense is that the criminal group that is holding the whole world to ransom, headed by George H. W. Bush Sr., has gone too far even for ‘underworld’ and banking sector compartments previously considered to be its allies and fellow-travellers.

Which should not surprise any of us at all, and should also serve as a warning to those who persist with the erroneous belief that the Revolution cannot be stopped and that the worst outcomes (of which innumerable terrible scenarios are painted and repainted daily) are inevitable.

THEY ARE NOT, and both the exposures to date and their consequences should have made this plain enough by now. Far from being inevitable, the World Revolution is COLLAPSING.

ENFORCEMENT OF THE WORLD COURT’S WRIT IS MANDATORY
So what is happening ‘as we speak’? According to our sources, the heavy enforcement personnel (referred to as ‘the Swiss’) are REQUIRED to procure the demands set out in the World Court writ: that is to say, they have UNLIMITED POWERS TO EXECUTE THE WRIT and may use all means at their disposal to satisfy it. Nothing, we understand, is excluded in this context.

TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS STOLEN BY BUSH 41 AND 43 RETRIEVED
So far, we understand that:

• The World Court enforcement personnel (‘bailiffs’ with powerful backup’) have retrieved SEVERAL TRILLION DOLLARS STOLEN BY CRIMINAL U.S. PRESIDENTS BUSH 41 AND BUSH 43.

• They have presided over a wave of arrests all round Europe.

• They are poised to effect further arrests all over America, taking place in real-time now.

• They have powers to arrest holders of the highest offices INCLUDING THE U.S. PRESIDENT AND THE VICE PRESIDENT if they get in the way of execution and implementation.

• Interference or resistance to the will of the foreign governments as demanded by the World Court on their behalf, whether by the President of the United States or by any other holder of high (or any) office under the United States, will represent OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, against which the enforcement team have power to retaliate in decisive fashion.

• The team may be entitled to deploy force to achieve their objectives: as indicated above, they can use ANY MEANS to enforce the World Court’s demands on behalf of foreign Governments and sovereign powers who have been defrauded by the United States Government.

• As also indicated above, they are NOT in a position to report back to the World Court that they have been unable to procure satisfaction of the requirements of the Court’s writ, or else the personnel THEMSELVES will be arraigned for OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

• Therefore, failure to implement the will of the wronged Governments as specified by the World Court’s Writ of Execution, is NOT AN OPTION.

OBAMA WHITE HOUSE ADVANCE TEAM RESPONSIBLE FOR ‘FLU OUTBREAK?
The Washington Post reported at 1:54pm Thursday that a member of the Security Advance team for President Obama’s recent trip to Mexico is suspected of having contracted swine ‘flu.

The Security Advance Team is part of Homeland Security which took over the Secret Service under former criminal President George W. Bush.

The obvious deduction is that this operative may have been handling the phial containing the swine ’flu pathogen, and that it was released in Mexico by the President’s personnel in advance of the President’s visit to Mexico – so that the resulting epidemic or much worse would appear to have originated in Mexico, whereas, as we asserted in the report dated 29th April, the laboratory-developed disease will have been developed at the Army Medical Command, Fort Detrick, MD.

This UNPRECEDENTED SCANDAL means that President Barack Obama, or the Bush-Clinton criminal gangsters, or all of the above, have deliberately unleashed one of the blackmail weapons that they have held up their sleeve in order to blackmail the US Government, the American people and the Rest of the World, should they find themselves up against a steel wall, as is now the case.

Thus criminal forces within the American Government are waging not just economic and financial terrorism against Americans and the Rest of the World, but BIOLOGICAL TERROR as well.

Either Obama will have to clean out the White House and his Cabinet forthwith, or he himself will be removed, by whatever means, or will find that the outcry is such that he has to leave office.

The international repercussions from this development will be COLOSSAL.

A senior British intelligence source cited by a correspondent is reported to have warned that this criminal group would perpetrate bio-attacks around the world, and that, as a consequence, millions of people would die. This intel source did not convey any such assessment to us, but then British intelligence doesn’t talk to us directly at all.

[On the contrary, MI6 attempted in 2004, through the veteran journalist Gordon Thomas, to deflect the Editor from pursuing these enquires, accompanied by threats of some trumped-up exposure or other which had already been disseminated to the UK ‘mainstream’ press. In response, the Editor published the entire text of the threatening conversations with Mr Gordon Thomas in our financial journal, which was the last that was heard of this operation. Since then, the Editor has been very conspicuously barred from the British media. But the consolation prize is that the readership of this website exceeds the entire readership of all British newspapers combined].

CRIMINALS OPERATING INSIDE THE U.S. GOVERNMENT ARE WAGING BIO-TERRORISM AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND THE REST OF THE WORLD FOR SELF-ENRICHMENT
Whichever way this unfolds, there is NO DOUBT now that the ‘pig ’flu’ outbreak is DIRECTELY CONNECTED with the criminal finance crisis which has come to a head this week as explained above. BEFORE we were aware of this Washington Post report, the following text had been prepared for this posting:

Against this background – none of which has been denied by knowledgeable sources with whom the data was checked – we now have no doubt whatsoever that the ‘Pig ‘Flu’ outbreak represents a deliberate bio-attack perpetrated by this criminal group. It is exactly as we perceived: CORNERED, they are unleashing, or threatening to unleash, the hideous weapons with which they have been BLACKMAILING the US Government, the American people, and the rest of the world.

We wouldn’t be surprised if it turns out that the ‘nukes in a suitcase’ bravado is part of the same armoury of blackmail weapons that this criminal gang has been holding in readiness, and which it has been using to prevent what needs to be done to cauterise this virus of criminality from the body of humanity. However the showdown is taking place, and the gang can’t stop it now.

If this is correct, then the US law enforcement community needs to understand that the blackmailer is always in a weaker position than the blackmailed. The reason for this simple reality is that once the blackmailer’s bluff has been called, he has ‘blown it’.

True, this criminal gang may have several layers of blackmail weaponry in their armoury. But the answer to that is that if their bluff is called with respect to the first blackmail layer, they will have been defeated before they can activate the second, escalated, blackmail dimension.

In any case, refraining from picking up these people because their blackmailing power is feared, represents OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE by law enforcement, including of course those elements referenced immediately below.

DISINFORMATION SPREAD BY U.S. LAW ENFORCEMENT
Separately, it has been stressed, correctly, elsewhere that ‘Black’ disinformation has been liberally disseminated by the ‘three-letter people’. The reason for this is that the head of that sub-snake is up to beyond his eyebrows in this criminal finance activity. The entire institution, a key component of US law enforcement, has therefore been compromised, which goes a very long way to explain why the US criminal gangs have not been brought down earlier.

We received several reports late on 29th April to the effect that Trustees and their lawyers had diverted paid-out funds to their own or separate accounts, although this corrupt practice has been ongoing for a long time. No doubt these people will be picked up in the prevailing sweep and will wind up contemplating, for 25 years, the life-cycles of the North American or European cockroach: if they survive, that is. And that, we suspect, is now very far from certain.

• It’s showdown time, big-time.

POSTSCRIPT: MORE ON OBAMA’S REMOVAL OF JESUS SYMBOL
In the report dated 29th April, the Editor has inserted a new segment concerning what happened when President Obama gave a speech at Georgetown University on 14th April. We are leaving the text in that report unchanged, but since posting it we have received photographs of the platform in the Georgetown University hall where Obama delivered his speech.

Behind the platform is a tableau with a triangular carved wooden headpiece which forms a focal point for the hall. Within the triangular surface delineated by the headpiece is the Christian symbol IHS painted in gold, with a cross rising above the H. This is a standard symbol used for centuries.

The Editor has before him a colour photograph of the platform with this carved wooden focal point, which contains, below the superstructure, the name Georgetown University and some other inscriptions not relevant to this commentary.

Also on the Editor’s desk is a second colour photograph showing the carved wooden headpiece with the gold-painted IHS blacked out, the entire area facing the hall being now entirely black.

The source who provided this information and photographs, is of impeccable credentials, integrity and standing, and the foregoing information is accurate. It seems that President Obama did not wish to be televised beneath the well-known symbol, traceable to the early Christian era, of Jesus Christ. You may draw your own conclusions.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. Some versions have a ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

BITING CRITICISM OF THE CORRUPTION GOES ‘MAINSTREAM’

WAGONER COME-UPPANCE FOLLOWED OUR DERIVATIVES LEAFLET EXPOSURE

Tuesday 31 March 2009 20:00

FURTHER (BRIEF) UPDATE 2ND APRIL: THE U.S. PRESIDENT DID RISE TO THE OCCASION…
President Obama did rise to the occasion in London in certain pertinent respects, and was not only present at the meeting but gave an hour-long press conference as well. This indicates that he was able to ‘deliver’ in respect of certain crucial matters relevant to the whole world, which are alluded to obliquely in the communique. Sensitive and uniquely experienced leadership and inspiration from a certain illustrious quarter is believed to have pleased and assisted both parties concerned. For the time being, pending ‘further and better particulars’, the Editor will not be reporting, tonight at least, on the overall outcome of the G-20 meeting which was both satisfactory and unsatisfactory at one and the same time. The unsatisfactory features will have to be dealt with, but not quite yet. As far as we can tell, the President didn’t get to see the Crown Jewels in the Tower of London!

UPDATE 2ND APRIL: PRESIDENT OBAMA ‘TO GO SIGHTSEEING AT THE TOWER OF LONDON’
See at the top of the report ABOVE ‘NEW REPORT STARTS HERE’…

UPDATE AT FOOT OF THIS REPORT: WHAT DOES SARKOZY MEAN BY ‘DELIVERABLES’?
See immediately above to the reposted ‘snipped’ text from our posting dated 26th March

• BRITISH TV BROADCASTS OUR BARCLAYS REPORT PLUS THE HIGH-LEVEL ‘INTERVIEW’

• ‘MAINSTREAM’ REALISES IT IS BEING LIED TO AND MANIPULATED

• PRE-G-20 MEETING VIBES CONTINUE TO ‘GO PEARSHAPED’

• ABOUT THAT ‘DUMP’ (CONCRETE NUCLEAR BUNKER?) IN CANNING TOWN

• WAGONER ‘REMOVAL’ AND OUR ICR DERIVATIVES LEAFLET

• METROPOLITAN POLICE UPDATE ON THE 2ND JUNE 2008 RAIDS IN LONDON

• REPEAT OF MATERIAL THAT WAS ‘SNIPPED’ FROM OUR REPORT DATED 26TH MARCH

• MADOFF ‘VICTIMS’ LIST: Two reports were posted on 6th February 2009 containing the entire list of customers of Bernard L. Madoff Securities, Inc.. Because the list is so huge, we divided it into two segments: Clients A-N; and clients O-Z, plus a Miscellaneous Section. See: Archive. Our list is the easiest to load and clearest of the lists that have been reproduced privately on the Internet.

• We have just published: International Currency Review Volume 34, #2 on Systemic Fraudulent Finance and The Legalisation of Financial Corruption. Also just published are issues of our titles Economic Intelligence Review, London Currency Report, Interest Rate Service and Arab-Asian Affairs. For further details, please check the second white panel on the Home Page.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice is comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the Internet Security Solution software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

• DONATIONS: You can help finance these exposures (which the Editor has to prepare on top of his normal publishing responsibilities) by sending us a donation. Press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

• The CONTACT US facility is found in the red box throughout this combined website.

PRESIDENT OBAMA ‘TO GO SIGHTSEEING AT THE TOWER OF LONDON’
It emerged in the course of Wednesday 1st April, always allowing for April Fool’s Day of course, that the ‘signal’ emitted by the frenetic operative President Nicolas Sarkozy by his provocative use of the word ‘deliverables’ represented the surfacing of an immense row that has been blazing behind the scenes as these characters vie among themselves for leverage in the context of the fact that President Obama may have arrived empty-handed for the G-20 Meeting, after blocking the releases on Monday (as reported below). You could almost cut the tension with a kitchen knife.

According to our sources, the President of the United States is to go sightseeing at the Tower of London tomorrow, having been told by President Sarkozy and one or two other leaders that he cannot surface at the Canning Town ExCel Centre dump with the rest of them unless he provides concrete undertakings concerning a timetable for the releases.

• In other words, it is reported to us by several sources that the President of the United States and his team have been EXCLUDED from the G-20 meeting. It’s quite difficult to imagine that this state of affairs will have been patched up overnight, but bravado and brinkmanship may be in play.

EXECUTION, NOT MORE ‘UNDERTAKINGS’ THAT THE U.S. WILL RENEGE UPON, IS REQUIRED
If this is true (and the entire ghastly situation is typically in a state of extreme flux as the bickering, bargaining and bludgeoning among the rats in this sack continues right up to the ‘finishing’ line), it would be an absolutely deplorable outcome SINCE NO UNDERTAKING GIVEN BY THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT can be relied upon. How any foreign power can imagine otherwise, after the abuses and abominations perpetrated in recent years by Washington, is a mystery.

It would be an act of extreme folly for the other G-20 leaders to accept anything at all other than EXECUTION. US undertakings that execution will occur in the future, WILL BE BROKEN.

FINGER-POINTING IN PREPARATION FOR A CASCADE OF EXCUSES FOR NON-PERFORMANCE
Certain sources inform us that the problem all along has been that the Connecticut Trust group, serving the interests of the Bush Cabal, have sabotaged the releases process throughout and that certain top trustees have made a habit of going to the bank, creaming off the profit, and retiring to wait for the start-up process to begin all over again: and that this behaviour has continued for a considerable period of time. Whether this or something like it is near the truth or not, what is fact is that the President of the United States can ORDER compliance with his requirements, and that he can do so inter alia by issuing Executive Orders accordingly.

Thus he could issue Executive Orders to each of the THIRTEEN banks and the other associated parties, and to the Connecticut Trust, DEMANDING compliance according to a specific timeframe.

We are, however, STAGGERED, that such suggestions are floating around at this late stage. If this formula, or something like it, were appropriate, it should have been applied the moment President Obama came to power. Instead of which, we have drifted into April, with the situation becoming more and more tense as these rats smile in public but attack each other behind the scenes.

They are ALL in severe danger of getting up the noses of the whole world with their self-centred, destructive antics. The world is expecting results, and by the vibes sensed to date, all that can be identified is MORE TENSION, MORE SQUABBLING, MORE DISCORD, MORE GRANDSTANDING AND SO FAR, NO SIGN THAT THE FRAUDULENT FINANCE ISSUES ARE BEING ADDRESSED.

THE ORCHESTRATED OUTBREAKS OF LUNACY IN LONDON:
As for the antics in London, we have several points to make:

• At the Press Conference with Gordon Brown in the morning of 1st April 2009, April Fool’s Day, assinine British journalists wasted the world’s time with insulting, childish questions. Some idiot from the Sun, a filthy rag published by the globalist with 33 offshore subsidiaries, Rupert Murdoch, asked the President of the United States some fatuous question about football and several other non-issues. You probably observed the huge smile that broke across the face of Gordon Brown, for whom smiling is normally a physical problem. The reason for this gorgeous smile?

The nutcase at the Sun had obligingly asked three goofy questions, so a nice big chunk of the Press ‘Conference’ would now be taken up with trivia of the most degrading kind, thereby relieving the leaders of the residual likelihood that they might be called upon to answer probing questions of substance. If Barack Obama had possessed any spine, he would have retorted that he is in the British capital to do serious business, and has no time or inclination to answer foolish questions.

But no. Lots and lots of precious minutes were deliberately squandered in this display of fatuous stupidity, which degraded the office of the Presidency and made the British Prime Minister look even more trite than has become the norm. But wow, we’ve never seen him smile like that before!

• Concerning the ‘rioting’, you will have observed that the number of ruffians was very modest, probably not more than 3,000. This would appear to be the sum total of the controlled rent-a-mob, directed by paid agents, that could be summoned up to perform the ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS OF OBFUSCATION, DIVERSION AND REDIRECTION, so that the BBC, CNBC et al could focus on these childish antics while the bickering, bargaining and bludgeoning continued behind the scenes in the rat-sack. Reasons that we can confirm that the above is a quasi-accurate summary of the situation include knowledge that paid agents were at work (as in former overt Communist countries), and the obvious fact that the Metropolitan Police could perfectly well have cordoned off much of the City of London so that the rent-a-mob could not get close enough to Royal Bank of Scotland to break all their street level windows.

Mind you, no-one anywhere in the world will have shed a tear about that particular display of vandalism: indeed, one would be inclined to the view that smashing windows at RBS may have been a ‘licensed activity’, and probably organised deliberately.

The other purpose of this orchestrated theatrical display, which may be ‘escalated’ on Thursday, will have been to feed ‘revolutionary TV coverage’ all round the world, in accordance with the World Revolutionary remit to which manipulative elements behind the scenes are working. As for the BBC’s sycophantic coverage of the rabble, nothing gets in the way of that subversive entity’s perverse insistence upon maximising the potential for fostering unease, dissent and tension.

Come the real counter-revolution, the British Broadcasting Corporation will need to be severely reformed and put back on a charter which requires it to elevate standards of morality across the board and to cease and desist from its perverse role as an instrument of the Revolution.

• NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

BRITISH TV BROADCASTS OUR BARCLAYS REPORT PLUS THE HIGH-LEVEL ‘INTERVIEW’
While the Editor was travelling yesterday (he is back in London), our report dated 26th (and 30th) March was extensively publicised on a British TV network, in the afternoon. The two segments that were taken up by ‘mainstream’ TV were the section dealing with the Barclays Bank corruption and the judicial cover-up, and Lord Oakshott’s grim exposure of that bank’s nefarious operations in the House of Lords; and the ‘dialogue’ between President Obama and The Queen, written by the Editor of this service on the basis of ‘relevant information’.

Apparently the fact that our reports were taken up by ‘mainstream’ TV annoyed some people, as though we ourselves sought that coverage. No, we did not. We haven’t solicited independent coverage for anything that we have ever publicised. There’s no need to. That’s the whole point.

It is interesting that those who were annoyed, reacted to the reports ‘going mainstream’. Think about that. What this implies is that, as we have said before, so long as the reports are somehow confined to the Fifth Estate, there’s not a problem (of exposure): but when the crossover takes place, these people get rattled. THIS IS BACK TO FRONT. We know for a fact that our readership, per report, exceeds the total circulations of all British newspapers combined. Therefore, the boot should be on the other foot: it is the Fifth Estate that has been spearheading these exposures, not the ‘mainstream’: it didn’t wake up to the fact that there was a problem until the roof was about to fall in. Everyone knows this, so it astonishes us that our crossover into the ‘mainstream’ was a problem for those who were ‘annoyed’. They seem to be somewhat behind the curve here.

‘MAINSTREAM’ REALISES IT IS BEING LIED TO AND MANIPULATED
This also shows that the ‘mainstream’, realising it is being deceived, manipulated, controlled and lied to, is now accessing those sources of information that can be trusted within the Fifth Estate (a.k.a. the Internet). This is a NEW development.

And pertinent to this was our reference in the 30th March report to the likelihood that ‘mainstream’ journalists are venting their professional annoyance, even anger, at being deceived, manipulated, controlled and lied to, by rubbishing the characters and behaviour of key globalist operatives on the stage ahead of the overhyped G-20 meeting to be held out at that dump in Canning Town.

PRE-G-20 MEETING VIBES CONTINUE TO ‘GO PEARSHAPED’
Concerning which, everything, we understand, is going pearshaped in sync, given that:

• As widely publicised, President Sarkozy of France has threatened to walk out of the dump if the meeting papers over the cracks and doesn’t tackle the fundamental problems head-on: but his definition of the underlying problems remains unclear as he doesn’t define his terms.

• President Obama blocked the releases yesterday, according to informed sources: because:

• The payee countries are squabbling among themselves, with the big powers and with the United States, over what projects are to be funded, who is getting what, when, and/or all of the above, and:

• Our sources stress that President Obama wants the payouts done properly.

•NOTE: This is what we are being advised. However we remain AGNOSTIC/SCEPTICAL as to whether this is a cover for a failure to release, or the opposite. Right now, it’s not yet clear.

• Memorandum item: Republican crooks in the Congress are reported to be wingeing because they aren’t getting the kickbacks to which they’ve become accustomed. Applies to the others, too.

ABOUT THAT ‘DUMP’ (CONCRETE NUCLEAR BUNKER?) IN CANNING TOWN
The ExCel Centre is the most hideous bunker-style block of concrete imaginable. We understand that in addition to the reason for relegation of the G-7 meeting to Canning Town given earlier (it will be the first time that any Head of State has been anywhere near the place since the days of King Canute), this hideous location was chosen precisely because it is such a long way from the centre of the British capital city, so that if it is attacked, the physical collateral damage to the surrounding area ‘won’t matter’, in comparison to the disaster which would occur if the Queen Elizabeth Centre opposite Westminster Abbey were to be attacked. In such a catastrophe, the ancient, venerable Westminster Abbey might be destroyed. Also, one presumes that the remote concrete dump was constructed for a purpose, namely to withstand any category of attack, even a nuclear attack.

WAGONER ‘REMOVAL’ AND OUR ICR DERIVATIVES LEAFLET
As reported earlier, a leaflet containing three charts extracted from International Currency Review, Volume 34, #2, distributed in March, has been disseminated to relevant quarters in Washington DC and in the Virginia area. The charts show the participation of General Motors, Ford Motor Company, and General Electric in the MBS-CDO-CDS Fraudulent Finance Non-recourse Carousel. Extensive coverage of this corruption is provided in the International Currency Review presentation.

Mr Wagoner, CEO of General Motors was ‘removed’ from his post SPECIFICALLY because of GM’s participation in these transactions, we have been advised.

• A subtle point is appropriate here. Do not imagine for a single moment that there was ever any intention that Mr Wagoner should leave his post, UNTIL the participation of GM in this Fraudulent Finance activity was publicised: but given that International Currency Review Volume 34. #2 is now resident on desks and in official offices all around the world, there was nothing much they could do to de-publicise it, especially since we have distributed the leaflet with the charts showing how this scam was perpetrated and how General Motors, in receipt of colossal US taxpayer funds, had been engaged in these activities. Another component of the Octopus’s scamming activity BLOWN.

METROPOLITAN POLICE UPDATE ON THE 2ND JUNE 2008 RAIDS IN LONDON
The Metropolitan Police have updated the press concerning the outcome, at least that element thereof that can be reported for public consumption, of the massive police raids on ‘Safety Lock Boxes’ located in Mayfair, Edgeware and Hampstead, previously reported by this service.

In a conversation with Scotland Yard’s Press Office on 31st March, the Editor established that 2,457 lock boxes and their contents were restored to their rightful owners, while more than 3,500 of the boxes and their contents were confiscated and have triggered massive worldwide investigations.

Bear in mind, when reading what follows, that we are NOT being told that the Lock Boxes held the stolen and other collateral used for Fraudulent Finance operations, because this subject remains taboo except with the Fifth Estate. However reading between the lines, the following summary of the police update, which appeared in The Times, London, dated 25th March 2009 [page 17], is quite revealing, under the circumstances. The Editor spoke to the Press Office to check out the report:

‘A police raid [backed by 300 heavily armed police marksmen – Ed.] on safety deposit boxes has revealed “an Aladdin’s cave of criminality” spanning murder, money-laundering, paedophilia, people-trafficking and drug-running, leading to 1,000 separate inquiries around the world’.

‘More than 3,500 deposit boxes were raided last June by officers from the Metropolitan Police’s Specialist Crime Directorate. They seized £35 million in cash, of which £1.0 million has yet to be claimed, dozens of passports, cocaine, FORGED BANKING BONDS, including one for $4.95 million, and suitcases full of gold and cannabis (marijuana). The Times has learned that the contents of some of the boxes are being investigated by the Counter Terrorism Command’.

‘Seven hundred of the box-holders are being referred to Customs for suspected tax evasion involving £15.0 million. So far, 11 people have been charged in connection with the raid(s), codenamed Operation Rize, and 40 people have been arrested’.

‘Detective Chief Inspector Mark Ponting, from the Economic and Special Crime Command, said:

‘”Some of the boxes have not been accessed for some years, including boxes that contain millions of pounds. Some belonged to prisoners hoping to pick up their stashes on emerging from jail’.

• But of course, this is only the information that’s allowed out FOR PUBLIC CONSUMPTION.

REPEAT OF MATERIAL THAT WAS ‘SNIPPED’ FROM OUR REPORT DATED 26TH MARCH
Given the arrogance of those responsible for the illegal ‘snipping’ of substantive portions of our report dated 26th March, which we restored and also reposted with the report posted on the 30th,
and given that these portions remain strictly pertinent to what is happening this week in London, we are reposting the ‘snipped’ material AGAIN, not least to make the point that if you interfere with this website, WE WILL RETALIATE. Further, as one friend put it last night on the Editor’s return:

• If they want a rest from the biting criticism which is clearly ‘hurting’, the way forward is to STOP THE CORRUPTION and to PAY OUT THE HIJACKED RELEASES instead of complaining about all this EXPOSURE. The exposure is a specific consequence of the corruption: so, to bring an end to the exposure, the smart thing is to STOP THE CORRUPTION. But since THIS IS NOT HAPPENING, the exposures will continue until these crooks come to their senses (if they have any).

• It is noticeable that more and more observers are cottoning on that CRIMINALITY lies behind the global crisis. This wasn’t the case even a few weeks ago. The secret of these exposures is to focus on the fact that we are dealing with a BLACK CABAL OF HIGH-LEVEL CRIMINALS who do not appear to realise that they have been STOOD UP TO and that the British, American and external publics are less and less prepared to put up with their abuses and abominations.

• Indeed we now are being advised that the mood of the British public is only a few notches below one of UNRESTRAINED FURY at the insensitive arrogance of these serial criminalist scumbags.

• So, public relations-wise, the grandstanding for the G-20 conference ISN’T WORKING.

WHAT DOES SARKOZY MEAN BY HIS OUTBURST USING THE WORD ‘DELIVERABLES’?
As a French speaker, the Editor of this service has difficulty imagining that President Sarkozy used the word ‘deliverables’ with the intention that it should refer to anything OTHER than the releases which have been hijacked by the reprobate US authorities for years. However as is ALWAYS the case with these two-faced, double-minded operatives, scope exists for the French President, or his hard-faced Finance Minister, to ‘explain’ later that what he meant was NOT what those ‘in the know’ THINK he meant. So although we reproduce herewith several reports of Lagarde’s interview with the BBC on Monday, it is still (slightly) open to question whether the French President meant what we and others BELIEVE he meant.

Further, the Editor has never come across the word ‘deliverables’ used in the French language like this, so the strong presumption must be that Sarkozy chose this word deliberately, in order to raise the temperature and try to FORCE resolution of the releases.

At this juncture, we prefer to quote published sources verbatim, and leave the reader to reach his or her own conclusions. As of 1:15am on April Fool’s Day, 228 sources posted on the Internet were quoting this outburst. A FEW had REMOVED the word ‘deliverables’: which, like the ‘snipping’ of our text on 29th March, effectively CONFIRMS that the ‘releases’ interpretation is correct.

This fracas ALSO demonstrates that RESISTANCE (see above) to the releases has persisted right up to the threshold of the G-20 meeting, implying an environment of absolute chaos and confusion, as is typically to be expected of rats in a sack, especially this demented strain of rats:

(1) The Daily Telegraph: Report by Henry Samuel in Paris and Toby Harnden in London: Excerpts:

‘If Mr Sarkozy’s strident demands for a new, restrictive regulatory structure were not met then he would leave an “empty chair”, the French Presidnet’s Finance Minister warned, hours before President Barack Obama arrived in London to meet Gordon Brown before the start of the summit on the global economic crisis’.

‘”President Sarkozy was very clear on that front: he said if the deliverables were not there, I won’t sign the communique”, Christine Largarde said’.

‘”It means walking away. I think he’s very determined”‘.

• Memorandum item: The authors of this report thought that Sarkozy was talking about regulation, and demonstrated that they appeared to have no clue what he was really (probably) talking about.

• FURTHER Memorandum item (inserted Wednesday 6:30pm UK time): The PRINTED edition of The Daily Telegraph today OMITTED the pointed reference to ‘deliverabes’, confirming the analysis that this was a one-off SIGNAL (typical of the Illuminati’s modus operandi) which was NOT MEANT TO RESONATE beyond the purpose for which it was intended: i.e. to send a sharp reminder to Messrs Brown Sarkozyque that they had BETTER DELIVER, OR ELSE.

(2) ABC News: Report by Karen Travers and Jake Tapper: Excerpts:

‘Tensions over how to handle the global economic crisis erupted before the G-20 summit even began, with French President Nicolas Sarkozy threatening today to walk out of the meeting if the countries do not agree to stronger international financial regulations’.

‘French President Nicolas Sarkozy’s tough talk puts him at odds with President Obama who is en route to the meeting of the world’s wealthy nations’.

‘The French President is quoted in the Paris newspaper Le Figaro vowing, “If there’s no progress in London, there’ll be an empty chair. I’ll get up and leave”‘.

‘”Yes, we will,” French Finance Minister Christine Lagarde told the BBC’.

‘”President Sarkozy was very clear on that front. He said that ‘If the deliverables are not there, I won’t sign the communiqué’… It means walking away”‘.

‘The report cited Sarkozy’s advisers as saying the French delegation would balk at a summit that produces a “false success with language that sounds good but contains no commitments”‘.

‘The BBC interview brought into public view tensions that have been simmering for weeks among European countries and the U.S. over how to deal with the economic meltdown’.

‘Sarkozy had earlier said the economic crisis was caused by “Anglo-Saxons” and is pushing for tougher regulations, including rules that would apply to money launderers, tax havens, and companies and hedge funds that could threaten the economic system’.

• Memorandum item: The authors of this report thought that Sarkozy was talking about regulation, and demonstrated that they appeared to have no clue what he was really (probably) talking about.

(3) Bloomberg: Report by Simon Kennedy and Francois de Beaupuy: Excerpts:

‘French President Nicolas Sarkozy will walk out of this week’s Group of 20 summit if his push for stricter international financial regulation flops, Finance Minister Christine Lagarde told the British Broadcasting Corporation’.

‘Sarkozy will refuse to sign any statement if he feels “the deliverables are not there”, Lagarde said in the interview. “I think he is very determined”’.

‘“It’s a bombshell to be honest,” said Philip Whyte, senior research fellow at the London-based Center for European Reform. “If such a high-profile leader would walk out of the summit, it likely would be seen as very negative on the stock and bond markets. It would highlight the disunity among the leaders when the times require a show of unity, concrete actions’. [BLAH, BLAH].

• Memorandum item: The authors of this report thought that Sarkozy was talking about regulation, and demonstrated that they appeared to have no clue what he was really (probably) talking about.

(4) The Wall Street Journal: Report by David Gauthier-Villars: Excerpts:

‘French Finance Minister Christine Lagarde said President Nicolas Sarkozy would walk away from this week’s Group of 20 meeting in London if no progress was made on global financial regulations’.

‘”President Sarkozy was very clear on that front”, Ms. Lagarde said in an interview with the BBC Television recorded on Monday and made available on the BBC’s website on Tuesday. “He said: ‘If the deliverables aren’t there, I won’t sign the communiqué’. It means walking away”‘.

‘Lagarde’s office said Tuesday that she had intended to underline that President Sarkozy is “highly determined” to achieve concrete results at the G-20 meeting’.

‘A spokesman said her comments should not be interpreted as an indication that the French President intends to leave in the middle of the meeting’.

‘Ms. Lagarde’s comment came as the U.S., the U.K. and other members of the G-20 are struggling to reach a consensus on how to tighten financial rules and boost the world economy. The U.S. and the U.K. are calling for tougher financial regulation at the national level, while France and Germany are lobbying in favor of more supra-national regulation’.

‘Asked Tuesday whether he might leave before the end of the summit, President Sarkozy said that he remained focused on working with the other G-20 members to find ways to solve the global economic crisis. “The crisis is too serious for us to hold a summit for nothing,” Mr. Sarkozy said’.

• Memorandum item: Note that in THIS report, Sarkozy is said to have watered down his threat. That REINFORCES the view that the use of the word ‘deliverables’ was intended as a signal to President Obama, who (see above) BLOCKED the releases on Monday, thereby squandering the then 72-hour Swift ‘window’ period for settlement, that Obama’s action in yet again blocking the releases was not appreciated and would be liable to have severe consequences.

HOWEVER, the releases cannot be done ‘suddenly’: ANOTHER ‘Swift’ window period of 72 hours is necessary. An undertaking by Mr Obama at the G-20 to complete the process would be absolutely meaningless, since he cynically reneged on his signed undertakings last year, as re-reported in the ‘interview’ between Obama and The Queen that was ‘snipped’ from our report dated 26th March and reposted as reported above, and with this updated report [see below]. On the basis of these considerations, we suspect that the G-20 will wind up glossing over the issue of the ‘deliverables’, having to put up with another (empty?) undertaking from President Obama to complete.

After all, it was reported to us that Obama BLOCKED the releases on Monday, thus prompting the Sarkozy outburst, or perhaps the outburst pre-empted the blocking. Either way, and given that the countries were reportedly squabbling as indicated above, the omens for the ‘make or break’ pow-wow in the Canning Town nuclear bunker looked dismal as this update was being completed.

That’s why President Sarkozy risked informing the ‘mainstream’ about what is going on, by using the word ‘deliverables’. As you can see (and you can see further by accessing the 228+ postings on this subject), THE ‘MAINSTREAM DIDN’T ‘GET IT’, as it NEVER ASKS THE RIGHT QUESTIONS.

• POSTSCRIPT: VERY INTERESTINGLY, the CURRENT BBC report OMITS the reference to Sarkozy’s remark about ‘deliverables’ and simply asserts, far down in the article almost as an afterthought, that Largarde had said that Sarkozy would walk out if he didn’t get what he wanted. This suggests that a grim rearguard operation to staunch speculation about the voluble French President’s use of the word ‘deliverables’ has been ordered, so that the entire matter remains completely up in the air. Which is JUST PERFECT for the manipulators of the World Revolution.

The talks will be accompanied by tight security, with Metropolitan Police Commander Simon O’Brien last week warning that the capital was about to see an “almost unprecedented level of activity”.

• REPEAT OF THE ‘SNIPPED’ CONTENT FROM 26TH MARCH, FOR THE RECORD:

THE MAD INTENTION: TO MAKE THE ENTIRE DERIVATIVES SECTOR WHOLE AGAIN
With the Lombard Odier-wrapped illicit derivatives trading programme in full swing and being showered with what ‘new money’ the crooks have been able to generate and steal, the criminal official intention is to rebuild the broken derivatives sector, with the assistance of ‘bought and paid for’ corrupt hedge fund operators and money managers (not all of whom are professional sheisters obviously), and to keep the carousel going and building, fed with new money filched from gullible investors, whether borrowed on permissive terms from the Federal Reserve or not, with a view to making the entire derivatives mountain of around $700 trillion (excluding double-counting) ‘whole’ – notwithstanding the reality that hardly any of these derivatives ‘Structured Products’ contain ANY real value at all, since almost all of them are NON-RECOURSE.

This is all explained in the latest issue of International Currency Review, and also in Economic Intelligence Review [see second white panel], as well as in the four-page leaflet containing the three main charts which is being distributed in Washington, DC, and elsewhere.

All that our latest subscriber printed materials do is to point out the stark reality of the fact that these false constructs (derivatives) are by definition totally fraudulent and devoid of value, so that retrospective attempts sponsored by the demented US Government to pass off that they contain value represents a massive, unprecedented fraud on the US taxpayer and future generations of Americans, while at the same time:

• Guaranteeing the accumulation of new mountains of debt arising from the Federal Reserve’s outrageous lending for speculative purposes; and:

• Guaranteeing a hyperinflation. Pundits are now suggesting that this phenomenon will emerge in several years’ time. The Editor’s view is that the choices made by the new bunch of fantasists in charge in Washington are so extreme, So damaging, so wrong-headed and so destabilising, that the hyperinflationary pressures will become apparent much sooner than that – WITHOUT delivering any ‘beneficial’ impact to the ‘real’ economy in the interim.

IS THIS BEING DONE ON PURPOSE?
The decisions made since Obama took office are SO perverse that one is tempted to join those who insist that this is all being done on purpose. The correct answer to such empty speculation is that we don’t know whether this is the case or not.

On the basis of the Christian knowledge that the devil is the author of all lies and confusion, the Editor’s view is that these operatives are wallowing in devilish confusion and have fallen prey to diversionary, self-defeating, complex, elaborate ‘whizz-kid’, knee-jerk ‘solutions’ in a desperate bid to ‘resolve’ the colossal problem created by the corrupted money center banks themselves, which were indulging, until mid-September 2008, in unproductive, illicit, off-balance sheet speculative activity on a scale with no historical precedent.

That suggests that if it had not been for such wasteful,unproductive, untaxed, off-balance sheet speculation, many of the banks in question would be surplus to requirements.

According to Story’s First Law, ‘all organisations are run for the benefit of those who are running the organisation’. This, of course, explains why, deprived of the toys that they were playing with, the banks went on strike and have been hoarding and stealing funds ever since – precisely with a view to restarting the speculative, win-win Ponzi Fraudulent Finance that they were wallowing in prior to mid-September 2008, instead of focusing primarily on lubricating the real economy.

BANKS SUPERFLUOUS TO REQUIREMENTS
The smarter solution would have been to allow more than just Lehman Brothers to go to the wall. Wall Street, where the wall is, is supposed to believe in free markets, with no participant being subsidised at the expense of other participants. The new, decadent, twist is that all the relevant participants can have their corporate snouts in the trough, and to hell with the hyperinflationary consequences. The Wall Street institutions and the satellite hedge funds and other intermediaries, along with the banks, are all being subsidized AT THE EXPENSE OF THE REAL ECONOMY.

• It’s called a banker’s ramp.

IT’S NOT ‘THE ECONOMY, STUPID’: ITS ‘THE DERIVATIVES, STUPID’
And to cover all this up, the United States is now governed by a man who takes his cue from Fidel Castro and President Chavez. He thinks his gift of the gab can be relied upon somehow to save him from the devastating and very rapidly approaching adverse consequences of his perverse, wrong-headed decisions, which are holding up the recovery of the Rest of the World.

And he is using this gift of the gab to LIE to the American people that this is all about reviving the real economy, when it isn’t. It’s all about reviving the fraudulent derivatives sector carousel.

AND NOTHING ELSE.

• CMKM UPDATE:
The previously reported theft of the $12.8 billion was orchestrated to achieve three objectives at the same time:

• To dissolve the multi-billion dollar claims and Court Order related to CMKM et al, and to make it clear that the CMKM Attorney(s) have signed the appropriate documentation to secure the funds held at the Depositary Trust Clearing Corporation under Court Order, and STEAL THE MONEY.

• To satisfy the ‘Payee’ et al, by authorising and signing a Presidential Executive Order (15th January 2009) – thereby circumventing public disclosure (and possible physical threat when George W. Bush was no longer President of the United States) and STEAL THE MONEY.

• To STEAL the $12.8 billion via Presidential Order/Court Claim – and funds sitting under the control of the DTCC – with the intent to send the money to Carlyle et al., without any repercussions – via Bank of America, Tyler, Texas, and then to Canada.

• LORD MYNERS UPDATE:
Some time ago we reported that Lord Myners, the City (of London) Minister in the Gordon Brown Government, had publicly suggested that City bankers engaged in Fraudulent Finance should be prosecuted. We then received a prompt message to the effect that ‘they’ would be grateful if we did not ‘go on about this’. There was no explanation, as usual.

It has since emerged that Lord Myners, who was selected to head up the British Government’s investigation into tax havens, chaired a hedge fund group operating through Jersey, Channel Islands. Jersey is used by fund managers to keep profits offshore so as to avoid British tax.

Before becoming a Government Minister, Lord Myners was appointed to head a company that took over Liberty Ermitage Jersey, controlling investments worth about $2.0 billion. Myners made his fortune with Gartmore, a prominent City fund management outfit, the Jersey, C.I., offshoot of which handled millions of pounds for more than 4,100 overseas investors.

Lord Myners was also involved with Aspen Re, a reinsurance firm located in Bermuda, thereby saving large sums in tax annually. A UK Treasury spokesman said on 23rd March:

‘All of his past business roles are a matter of public record and he has made a full declaration of the interests. The experience he brings continues to be hugely valuable to the Government at a time when we are working to restore and rebuild the banking sector’.

In other words, the British Government is relying, in part, on the toxic experience of a hedge fund manager, familiar with the Fraudulent Finance sector of course, to advise them on how to REBUILD the banking sector which has been devastated by its indulgence in Fraudulent Finance.

Maybe when he called for British bankers who have been engaged in Fraudulent Finance to be prosecuted, he was going too far for the likes of certain interests. It is normally the case that these people reinvent themselves as ‘whiter than white’ (‘Blankfeinism’), but it would appear that Lord Myners’ linen might not necessarily emerge gleaming white from the wash.

APPENDIX ONE:
Observations from The New York Times on the latest instalment of ‘Geithnerism’ [25th March 2009]:

• Can banks that received Government bailouts use taxpayer money to bid on toxic assets, in the hope of making a profit? [Correct answer: NO – Ed.].

• Can banks sell some assets and then use the proceeds, leveraged by generous Government financing, to buy more of the same? [Correct answer: NO – Ed.].

• Might investment houses be tempted to overpay, if doing this buoys up the value of their own investments? [TARP provides for an Oversight Review Committee with clawback powers to compel restitution if too much is paid. This explains why Goldman Sachs is rushing to pay back the billions it received from the Government so that it is not bound by the TARP restrictions. No-one is asking about ‘source of funds’: whence the Goldman billions for repaying the Government? – Ed.].

• In the end, it will be the taxpayer who will be largely footing the bill.
[Not ‘in the end’: straight away – Ed.].

• Joseph E. Stiglitz, a Nobel Prize-winning economist, in an interview with Reuters, called the program “very badly flawed” and said it offered “perverse incentives” that amounted to “robbery of the American people”. [Couldn’t have said it better ourselves – Ed.].

• Bert Ely, a prominent banking consultant, said investors would be cautious because many crucial details were still missing – the size and terms of loans they would receive from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, for example, and the amount of equity they would be allowed to put in, and whether banks would be allowed to walk away if they did not like the price at auction. “Today we know a lot more than we did yesterday, right?” Mr Ely said. “I’m being facetious!”.

• Many questioned the auction mechanism to sell toxic assets off from banks’ balance sheets. Price, most experts agree, is the biggest sticking point. The banks want to sell high. Potential investors want to buy low. [There is STILL no indication of how the fake ‘assets’ that are to be bought initially, will be priced – Ed.].

• Banking executives said that that their institutions would not want to unload ‘assets’ at fire-sale prices, a step that would compel many of the banks to raise sizeable amounts of additional capital. [Even though ‘fire-sale’ prices would be much too expensive given that the assets are fraudulent to begin with and therefore worth $0. $0 + $0 = $0, usually – Ed.].

• Under the accounting rules, banks must carry securities on their books at market prices. Most financial firms have already marked down these ‘assets’ to prices that might be low enough to lure buyers. But banks need not carry ordinary loans at market value. Instead, they are allowed to hold them at their higher values until they are repaid. So, for many commercial banks, selling loans now, at distressed prices would almost certainly lead to large losses. Such losses might raise questions about how some banks will fare in a so-called stress test that Federal regulators are in the process of applying to about 20 lenders.

“I don’t see how they are going to get the banks to sell”, said an executive at a large bank.
There are going to be substantial write-downs taken to get them off the books”.
[In other words, ‘Geithnerism’ CHANGES NOTHING. It doesn’t ‘amend reality’].

INTENTION HAD BEEN TO GET STARTED WITH CHINESE MONEY
After the Chinese parties had made the grave mistake of caving in to cynical pressure from the US authorities to participate in the latest instalment of ‘Geithnerism’, the Chinese would presumably have indicated their willingness for some of their funds to be used to purchase ‘toxic’ assets. The banks would have said: ‘But at what price?’ The Chinese would have responded: ‘Well if you don’t know the start-up buying price, we want our money back’. At which point the banks said: NO WAY.

APPENDIX TWO [excerpted from the report dated 24th March 2009]:
FACE-TO-FACE EXCHANGE BETWEEN PRESIDENT OBAMA AND THE QUEEN

Her Majesty: Good morning, Mr President, how very nice to meet you.

President Obama: It’s a pleasure to be here, Your Majesty.

HMQ: Mr President, I was concerned to hear about a small matter of $52 billion of my guarantees that apparently went missing recently.

PO: I understand that these were restored, M’am.

HMQ: Yes, but why were the guarantees diverted or stolen in the first place? Were any of my guarantees used for purposes for which they were not intended?

PO: I don’t know M’am. I imagine not.

HMQ: Mr President, you are aware, are you not, that after my LOAN funds within a total amount of $6.2 trillion languished within your banking system within the Treasury Custodial Account network at several money center banks for 19 months, to no avail, I was compelled, on 29th January 2009, to order the withdrawal of these funds, which were made available via the Bank of England on 19th-20th June 2007 to finance the Group of Seven-Approved Dollar System Refunding Programme by means of transparent private market trading transactions?

PO: I am, M’am.

HMQ: Mr President, are you aware of the REASON that I had to order these funds to be withdrawn?

PO: Not entirely, Your Majesty. Please explain.

HMQ: Mr President, when you toured European countries last year, you signed documents in which, I understand, you pledged to release all the blocked or hijacked funds and to proceed, if I am not mistaken, with the G-7-Approved private sector Refunding Programme. I had been led to believe that, in the light of your undertakings, you would indeed honour your commitments.

PO: My advisers decided that I should adopt alternative strategies, I am afraid.

HMQ: But Mr President, a signed commitment is a signed commitment, you know! Furthermore, my own expert advisers inform me that the ‘alternative strategies’ that your officials have adopted are designed to revalidate and revalue fundamentally worthless false derivative ‘assets’ while at the same time accumulating vast new mountains of real debt with which generations of Americans will be burdened in the future – a state of affairs which could have been entirely avoided if you had implemented the Group of Seven-Approved Dollar System private sector Refunding Programme for which I provided the necessary funds on LOAN, and which you undertook to do last year.

PO: Unfortunately, M’am, I was advised that our banks would not be prepared to cooperate in the proposed G-7-Approved private sector Refunding Programme.

HMQ: But Mr President, you carry the privilege of being the most powerful human being on earth! You have the power to insist upon the implementation of what was agreed by the world’s leading financial powers in 2007 and 2008! In addition, I made available a very large sum of money pro bono publico on a LOAN basis to finance this project, which I told the Group of Seven powers in 2007 was necessary ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’. Moreover the Group of Seven-Approved private sector Refunding Plan would have cost the US Treasury NOTHING, while showering it with windfall tax revenues for a long time to come! What on earth persuaded you to disregard this very simple and straightforward solution to your problems, which are OUR problems, too?

PO: Uh, I hear what you say, M’am. It looks as though the various patchwork schemes developed by Timothy Geithner are going nowhere anyway. I’ll reconsider the situation.

HMQ: Ah, but Mr President, as you know my LOAN funds were withdrawn on 29th January after it had become clear that your Administration was not about to honour its undertakings in this regard. I am advised that there is now a proposal that the G-7-Approved Refunding Programme should be run out of London. Very conveniently, there is a provision in British tax law whereby funds that are resident within the British jurisdiction for 24 hours, are taxable.

My Government finds it most attractive that windfall tax accruals should arise from such ongoing, transparent on-the-books trading activity. Of course, since the Refunding Programme will remain an American private sector operation, your Treasury will likewise receive immense ongoing accruals from tax. So, by running the transparent private sector Refunding Programme from London, we will be able to help you, after all. Don’t you think the daffodils in my garden are gorgeous this year?

PO (looking out of the Palace window at the magnificent display of British daffodils): Yes, Your Majesty, they are gorgeous. Don’t you think so, Michelle?

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. Some versions have a ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

U.S. FRAUD SCHEME LAUNCHED MONDAY IN BIG TROUBLE

QUESTION: WHAT IS THE ‘PRICE’ OF FRAUDULENT ‘ASSETS’ THAT HAVE NO VALUE?

Thursday 26 March 2009 00:01

MISPLACED WALL STREET GLEE AT FRAUD AGAINST U.S. TAXPAYERS

MID-SEPTEMBER ‘LOCKDOWN’ RECONFIRMED AS MOMENT OF TRUTH

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW DECONSTRUCTION OF FRAUDULENT FINANCE

MERKEL ORDERED REVENGE MURDER OF BRITISH TROOPS IN NORTHERN IRELAND

REVIVING THE CARCASS OF THE EXPIRED DERIVATIVES SECTOR

OBAMA SIGNS LOMBARD ODIER DARIER HENTSCH UP FOR ROLLING TRADING PROGRAM

PERVERSE U.S. OFFICIAL STRATEGY DOOMED TO FAILURE

BEST INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL BRAINS AREN’T BUYING IT

GOVERNMENT ARRANGED FOR THE BANKS TO STIFF THE CHINESE

BANKS USE BASEL-II AND TARP AS THEIR PRETEXT FOR ILLEGAL SEIZURE

CORRUPT GOVERNMENT AND CORRUPT BANKS WORKING TOGETHER

SO, WHAT ARE THE CHINESE GOING TO DO ABOUT THIS CRISIS?

BRITISH AND CHINESE HAVE BEEN TOO POLITE FOR TOO LONG

CONGRESS CANNOT CHANGE BASEL-II RULES! THAT’S THE POINT

BANKS ‘BLACKMAILING’ GOVERNMENT: BY PRIOR AGREEMENT

TOP OFFICERS OF THE BIG BANKS SHOULD HAVE BEEN ARRESTED

HOW THE CHINESE REACT TO THIS U.S. SCAM IS WHAT MATTERS NOW

G-20 MEETING IN LONDON WILL BE A FLOP

CRIMINALISTS DON’T CARE ABOUT PONZI VICTIM SUICIDES

THE MAD INTENTION: TO MAKE THE ENTIRE FAKE DERIVATIVES SECTOR WHOLE AGAIN

IS THIS BEING DONE ON PURPOSE?

IT’S NOT ‘THE ECONOMY, STUPID’: ITS ‘THE DERIVATIVES, STUPID’

• MADOFF ‘VICTIMS’ LIST: Two reports were posted on 6th February 2009 containing the entire list of customers of Bernard L. Madoff Securities, Inc.. Because the list is so huge, we divided it into two segments: Clients A-N; and clients O-Z, plus a Miscellaneous Section. See: Archive. Our list is the easiest to load and clearest of the lists that have been reproduced privately on the Internet.

• We have just published: International Currency Review Volume 34, #2 on Systemic Fraudulent Finance and The Legalisation of Financial Corruption. Also just published are issues of our titles Economic Intelligence Review, London Currency Report, Interest Rate Service and Arab-Asian Affairs. For further details, please check the second white panel on the Home Page.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice is comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the Internet Security Solution software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

• DONATIONS: You can help finance these exposures (which the Editor has to prepare on top of his normal publishing responsibilities) by sending us a donation. Press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

• The CONTACT US facility is found in the red box throughout this combined website.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

MISPLACED WALL STREET GLEE AT FRAUD AGAINST U.S. TAXPAYERS
On Monday 23rd March, as everyone knows, the Dow Jones Industrial Average soared by 6.8%, or 497.48 points, after details were released of how the Geithner Treasury proposes to relieve the criminal banks of the proceeds of their Fraudulent Finance operations, also known as ‘troubled assets’. TV screens were plastered with the unsavoury spectacle of brokers hugging each other, clasping hands and slapping each other on the back with joy.

Wall Street was ecstatic over the latest instalment of the gigantic fraud which the Obama-Biden-Geithner cabal have concocted to achieve the real objective of reigniting the derivatives trading carousel to inject value into worthless assets, lurking behind the public consumption objective of ‘freeing up the banks to start lending again’.

And, as usual, investors were jumping to knee-jerk conclusions, as was made clear by the crass reporting of this episode by The New York Times, which included comments such as the following attributed to T. Timothy Ryan Jr., President of the Securities and Financial Markets Association, who said the opposite of the truth of the matter:

‘For the first time in seven months, I can say they’ve done it right’.

MID-SEPTEMBER ‘LOCKDOWN’ RECONFIRMED AS MOMENT OF TRUTH
Before we continue, note the ‘seven months’ period mentioned here. Seven months takes us back to 10th-12th September 2008, when the $14.0 trillion of sovereign and HM The Queen’s LOAN funds were placed into ‘lockdown’ following the advice that we felt compelled to provide concerning the outrageous ongoing exploitation of The Queen’s LOAN money, which had been languishing within the Treasury Custodial Account network since it was sent over by the Bank of England on 19th-20th June 2007 to Bank of New York Mellon, whereupon the funds were hijacked for carousel financing purposes contrary to the instructions of the owner(s) of the funds.

The entire $14.0 trillion was finally removed from access by US parties altogether on 29th January 2009, after it had become clear that President B. Obama was in breach of the undertakings that he signed during his European trip last year, to effect the releases and proceed with the transparent Group of Seven-Approved Dollar private sector System Refunding Programme agreed upon by the G-7 financial powers in 2007 and 2008.

The Editor’s ‘exchange’ between Her Majesty The Queen and President Obama, published with the report dated 24th March 2009, summarises the present ‘state of play’ with respect to the proposal to proceed with the Refunding Programme independently of US Government intermeddling, from London. It is appended to this report as an Appendix for your convenience.

Mr Timothy Ryan Jr.’s reference to ‘seven months’ indicates what we know to be the case, namely that the ‘lockdown’ of the $14.0 trillion was the crucial factor that triggered the showdown.

It is also clear that because that happened, the White House, both under Bush II and Obama, are wilfully determined to ‘do it their way’ in accordance with the wishes of the money center banks – ‘their way’ involving the revalidation and revaluation of derivatives assets that are worth nothing because they are all NON-RECOURSE. This is clearly demonstrated, with the aid of charts, in the latest issue of International Currency Review [Volume 34, #2], which was mailed worldwide on 18th March 2009, just as the worst criminal event recorded to date in this crisis, apart from the stealing of The Queen’s gold, was about to ‘pop’ (see below).

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW DECONSTRUCTION OF FRAUDULENT FINANCE
To the extent that we have been able to clarify matters here, it is therefore a fact that every major government, institution and central bank in the world that matters has our deconstruction, in words and pictures, of the Fraudulent Finance Ponzi carousel – so that any attempt to smother reality is a complete impossibility. The issue’s theme is Systemic Fraudulent Finance and The Legalisation of Financial Corruption – which is exactly what the Geithner Treasury and the Obama White House are attempting to achieve. There is no change whatsoever from the previous Administration.

Now, the pack of hedge fund ‘big noises’ who have said they will ‘support’ the Geithner Fraudulent Finance Upgrade is headed by Bill Gross, of Pimco, which ‘works for’ George Bush Sr.’s criminal network, and therefore meets the requirements of the Nazi bank which stands behind this crisis – namely Deutsche Bank. It will be recalled that the German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, is bribed by Bush Sr. to protect his network’s assets within the German banking system.

MERKEL ORDERED REVENGE MURDER OF BRITISH TROOPS IN NORTHERN IRELAND
So it was no surprise to us when, all of a sudden a few weeks ago, a number of British troops in Northern Ireland were shot dead in cold blood at point-blank range. Why did this suddenly happen? Because, we are advised by UK intelligence sources, the German Chancellor, in deference to DVD, Dachau, gave the instructions for the Irish terrorist network, an instrument of long-range German Abwehr pressure against the United Kingdom, to be re-activated.

And why did Frau Merkel give these instructions?

Because the DVD and their associates inside Deutsche Bank had worked out that the events of 10th-12th September last year represented the gravest threat to the DVD’s operations and to its primary institution, Deutsche Bank, since the Second World War,

In parenthesis, it will be readily recalled that immediately after the 7/7 bombing of the London Underground and a bus in Central London, the order for which was given by the former French President Chirac on behalf of the Franco-German alliance, i.e. DVD, the Germans were told by a furious British Government (even though Tony Blair was totally compromised by both the Bush Crime Family and the European Union: see our report dated 12th October 2005: Archive) that if these terrorist acts, including the atrocities that were still ongoing in Northern Ireland, which unpenetrated components of UK intelligence knew were controlled ultimately by DVD, did not cease forthwith, Britain would initiate measures to exit from the European Union Collective.

Rather than risk facing the collapse of their long-range strategic deception entrapment operation calling itself the European Union, the Germans complied, and called off their controlled ‘assets’ in the Irish theatre. These were deliberately and provocatively reactivated by Chancellor Merkel the other day, in revenge for the deadly blow inflicted on the German hegemony project, by the events of 10th-12th September 2008 reported by this service.

REVIVING THE CARCASS OF THE EXPIRED DERIVATIVES SECTOR
Meanwhile the Obama-Geithner team are trying to rebuild the carcass of the exposed derivatives giga-pyramid-selling scam, despite the now deeply embedded and widely held knowledge that derivative so-called ‘Structured Products’ are worthless, and represent dead trash.

They are doing this by printing money and by creating debt out of thin air, while simultaneously operating a carousel platform which was triggered after the US Treasury found a foreign bank corrupt enough to agree to provide the foreign ‘wrap’ needed to reignite Fraudulent Finance trading under the radar, using monies that were ‘sequestered’ after the withdrawal of the $14.0 trillion on 29th January 2009, to form the basis for the secret trading operations which have been running for several weeks now at full tilt behind the scenes.

OBAMA SIGNS LOMBARD ODIER DARIER HENTSCH UP FOR ROLLING TRADING PROGRAM
The foreign bank was selected and signed up when President B. Obama arrived in Ottawa, Canada, on 19th February 2009, accompanied by the Chairman of his National Economic Council, Lawrence Summers, and the National Security Adviser, General Jim Jones. The visit, lasting seven hours, was Obama’s first trip abroad. A former US Ambassador to Canada, Gordon Griffin, made the following revealing statement about the visit:

‘There is an important “beyond Canada” component to this. Ottawa is providing a global platform’, he said. But he did not elaborate. Let us, therefore, elaborate in his stead.

The ‘important “beyond Canada”’ dimension’ referred obliquely to the signing of Lombard Odier Darier Hentsch, a very old Swiss bank, as the master counterparty for the hidden carousel trades that have been activated since shortly after that visit.

In other words, it took the Obama Administration just three weeks to find a corrupt foreign bank to do its dirty work – a display of wilful intent to engage in Fraudulent Finance on a gigantic scale (see below) in gross defiance of the Group of Seven, which had long since agreed the cost-free formula for reliquefying the US banks on-the-books – a formula which would cost the US Treasury and the taxpayer NOTHING because it would yield private sector TAXABLE REVENUE.

PERVERSE U.S. OFFICIAL STRATEGY DOOMED TO FAILURE
Instead of adopting this strategy, President Obama has knowingly adopted the perverse route to perdition, in deference to the blackmailing behaviour of the US banks: accordingly, since Obama is prepared to have the Federal Reserve lend untold volumes of fiat money creating Treasury debt in the background, he is deliberately and knowingly mortgaging the future of several generations of Americans, when he could have adopted the correct course and salvaged not only the American banking system, and economy, but the country’s battered reputation as a pariah state.

But he decided otherwise.

The Editor is perfectly well aware of allegations being made against the President of the United States, in all dimensions; but as a frequent visitor and friend of America, he considers that it would be unseemly for a ‘foreigner’ to engage in the polemical debate that is raging under that heading.

Furthermore, as a visitor, it is incumbent upon him to try to be polite about the Head of State, which is why he gave Mr Obama the ‘benefit of the doubt’ in the report dated 24th March 2009. It is not our job to enter into acrimonious internal debates that do not directly impinge upon the key vexatious INTERNATIONAL ISSUES that we have every right and a duty to our subscribers, to address. Some Americans who complained about the Editor’s ‘benefit of the doubt’ comment may have failed to take proper account of the Editor’s position here.

However given the grave INTERNATIONAL consequences of the doomed policies that President Obama is pursuing, we now have no hesitation, especially in the light of what transpired on Monday 23rd March – to be elaborated below – in stating that President Obama is engaged in Financial and Economic Fraud, not only against the American people, but against the Rest of the World, as well. We hope that this statement clarifies our position once and for all.

BEST INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL BRAINS AREN’T BUYING IT
Cutting a swathe through The New York Times’ coverage on Tuesday 24th March of the obscene outbreak of selfish euphoria on Wall Street on Monday, the following sober observations by Daniel Alpert, a Managing Director of the hedge fund Westwood Capital, stood out (in a secondary article):

‘We see another $1.5 to $2 trillion of as yet unrecognized losses from US assets still to hit global financial sector balance sheets and challenge its institutions. The near daily announcements over the past two weeks, by money center banks and finance companies, that they are making money this year on an operating income basis, have become borderline irresponsible, relative to the known continued deteriorations in value of the assets on their balance sheets and the continuing impact of a worsening recession’.

In other words, everyone’s under water: so what are they talking about?

Bearing in mind that the object of the White House exercise is FIRST OF ALL to reignite and re-start the derivatives carousel right across the board – an intention of extreme perversity, as we’ve explained – here is a deconstruction of events from 18th March 09 onwards, showing how ruthless these criminals are and why they can now be considered as dangerous as their evil predecessors.

Restarting the moribund (since 10th-12th September 2008) derivatives fraudulent money machine necessitates velocity of transactions once the pump has been primed: otherwise, in this carousel trading system, everything stalls. What the criminalist financiers NEED to reignite the system is LOADS OF NEW MONEY. This is why Geithner has come up with this scheme for new public-private partnerships, financed by fiat money generated by the Federal Reserve out of thin air but creating permanent real official debt on the other side of the balance sheet, so that the ‘private sector’ can provide the ‘new money’ that the criminalist financiers need to restart their giga-trading platform.

GOVERNMENT ARRANGED FOR THE BANKS TO STIFF THE CHINESE
We now understand that, as explained in the report dated 24th March, the Chinese parties were paid $13 trillion, between Wednesday 18th and Friday 20th March 2009, although given that the phrase ‘source of funds’ is strictly taboo now, neither we nor our sources are able to identify the complete provenance of this enormous volume of money – representing the ‘first instalment’ of the colossal sum that the Chinese are owed as explained in the preceding report.

But the Chinese parties then made the fatal mistake of agreeing to place some of these funds into a sort of ‘public-private partnership’ arrangement in the context of the latest Geithner wheeze which sent Wall Street investors into paroxysms of misplaced delight on 23rd March.

Guess what happened?

• The banks held onto the money. The banks would not release the funds repositioned with them by the Chinese parties, for the purpose for which the funds are intended. The US money center banks basically said: ‘We’re not paying anyone’.

BANKS USE BASEL-II AND TARP AS THEIR PRETEXT FOR ILLEGAL SEIZURE
Now the current Basel-II full disclosure regulations and the TARP legislation preclude the creating of non-securities such as derivatives ‘products’ for buy-sell trading operations by the new public-private partnership in which the Chinese parties were enticed to participate – thereby ‘enabling’ the banks to refuse to cooperate and to use this state of affairs as their excuse for holding onto the reinvested Chinese funds.

So, even as the Chinese parties were left understandably fuming and livid with anger at having AGAIN been defrauded by the crooks in the White House and the US Treasury, Timothy Geithner and Dr Ben Bernanke appeared before the House Banking Committee on Tuesday 24th March to ‘plead’ for changes in the banking regulations to permit ‘looser’ requirements – in other words, to ‘ask’ Congress to junk Basel-II (unspoken) so that the newly invested Chinese money could be legally deployed for the purpose intended by the Chinese after their arms had been twisted when they had demanded payment, or else they would exercise their lien over the Federal Reserve.

CORRUPT GOVERNMENT AND CORRUPT BANKS WORKING TOGETHER
Before we go any further, it needs to be understood that the criminal enterprise banks and the US Government ARE WORKING TOGETHER. This week, the big banks are the culprits. Last week, the authorities were the culprits. But now that it is the big BANKS who are illegally holding onto the Chinese money: after all, if it cannot legally (under Basel-II/TARP) be deployed for the derivatives trading purposes intended (which was a disastrous mistake on the part of the Chinese), the proper course of action for the banks would be to send the money back. But, being criminal enterprises, they have of course held onto it instead. Which was the whole purpose of the exercise.

Because the Government and the banks work together, the US authorities twisted the arms of the Chinese and persuaded them to participate in transactions KNOWING THEM TO BE ILLEGAL. To go through the motions of appearing to be ‘kosher’, Geithner and Bernanke appeared the next day before the House Banking Committee to ask the US Congress to ‘loosen the regs’ so that inter alia (unspoken, as indicated above) the Chinese derivatives trades can go ahead in the context of the latest instalment of the Geithner shambles. All very clever, very cynical, ruthless, and criminal.

SO, WHAT ARE THE CHINESE GOING TO DO ABOUT THIS CRISIS?
The central issue arising from this deplorable state of affairs can therefore be summarised in the form of the following questions:

• What are the Chinese parties intending to do, given that they have yet again been double-crossed by the US authorities but cannot blame the US authorities directly because the problem has ‘arisen within the banks’?

• And how long will the Chinese parties give the Americans before they take drastic action, as is their right, to obtain satisfaction following this latest display of outrageous criminal US official and commercial banking behaviour?

BRITISH AND CHINESE HAVE BEEN TOO POLITE FOR TOO LONG
If this Editor may now be permitted to indulge here in unsolicited advice, both the Chinese and the British parties have, in our view, been far too accommodating all along, as this crisis has expanded. The British are too accommodating because at the highest levels, business is still conducted on the basis of gentlemanly exchanges, and everyone is TOO POLITE.

• When dealing with gangsters, politeness is taken for weakness, which is why the British, too, have been repeatedly taken to the cleaners by these crooks.

The Chinese, too, are extremely polite: we know this from the impeccable manners and behaviour towards us of the Chinese Government subscribers to our printed publications. It is not for us to advise (but we hereby do so!) that when dealing with the organized criminal gangsters who have long since usurped power in the United States, politeness is a waste of time. It has its place at the beginning of a conversation: but the deceived and double-crossed Chinese parties need not now adhere to traditional, civilised cultural values when the magnitude of the crimes committed against them is known by both sides. On the contrary, a much harder line, and a willingness to adopt harsh countermeasures, is indispensable. These crooks have their weak spots, and the Chinese parties have more than enough intellectual resources to analyse their mentality correctly.

CONGRESS CANNOT CHANGE BASEL-II RULES! THAT’S THE POINT
Now it stands to reason that if the House Banking Committee were to have agreed to implement regulatory changes that fly in the face of Basel-II rules, any such changes, if agreed upon, would take weeks or months to travel through Congress. But the Committee could hardly consider any such departure. So what is the net result?

The banks get to keep a sizeable proportion of the Chinese trillions, which, you won’t be surprised to hear, they will be trading inside the Lombard Odier Darier Hentsch-wrapped derivatives carousel that was started up with the direct approval and very probably under the SIGNATURE of President Barack Hussein Obama – who, along with his Vice President Joseph Biden, has been talking up the Geithner Fraudulent Finance proposals that caused such an outbreak of unfettered joy on Wall Street. Which is another way of saying that President Barack Obama, Mr Timothy Geithner, Dr Ben Bernanke and Vice President Joe Biden, are co-conspirators in massive frauds.

Because in respect of the refusal of the banks to release the Chinese money that they have now effectively stolen, these operatives aided and abetted this latest outrageous theft, and it is clear from Obama’s visit to Canada, where he signed up Lombard Odier Darier Hentsch, that they knew precisely what they were doing all along.

BANKS ‘BLACKMAILING’ GOVERNMENT: BY PRIOR AGREEMENT
There is another way of looking at this – namely, that the banks are effectively BLACKMAILING the US Administration in accordance with the following equation:

• Get the regulations (Basel-II) loosened, and then we’ll think about releasing the Chinese monies. Unspoken: We may or may not also think about releasing other monies, especially $3.0 trillion to a US paymaster, that we were supposed to have released on 23rd March but conveniently managed to avoid doing. Also unspoken: We’ll do what we think is best for us and no-one else.

Because of course on Monday 23rd March, when payouts were widely expected, NOBODY WAS PAID because the banks kept all the money. The banks are holding a gun to the White House.

But on the other hand, the White House is quite content with this state of affairs because although that’s the way it looks, in reality the White House and the US Treasury are in cahoots with the banks because the primary object of everything Obama is doing is to reignite the derivatives carousel, which is the very opposite policy he should be pursuing.

TOP OFFICERS OF THE BIG BANKS SHOULD HAVE BEEN ARRESTED
The official response to the US money center banks’ seizure of the Chinese and other funds should have been to arrest all the senior officers of all the banks in question, and to do so in front of the TV cameras. Instead of which, co-conspirator Mr Timothy Geithner and co-conspirator Dr. Bernanke, against whom papers were served some time ago, appeared before the House Banking Committee to ask Congress’s assistance in making it possible for the banks to ‘enable the Chinese funds to be put to the use for which they were intended’. (Not really).

Except that, having got their fingers burned yet again, the Chinese parties should surely have decided by now that there is no way they will participate in ANY further US dollar transactions whatsoever – which may be why JPMorganChase has announced that it is disposing of certain shares in ICB, a Chinese institution (code for: the Chinese told them to get out of their laundry).

If we boil all this down further, we can see not only that:

• This operation against the Chinese was a deliberate dialectical operation coordinated between the Obama-Geithner team and the money center banks;

but also that:

• The banks have annexed a great deal of Chinese (and other) money that they will now be trading illegally, while at the same time they are anticipating a ‘get out of jail free card’ for their ‘virtuous’ behaviour in being ‘unable’ to release the Chinese funds for buy-sell fraudulent derivatives trade operations because to engage in such derivatives transactions (which they do all the time anyway) under Basel-II rules, would be fraud, commanding substantial jail sentences.

Geithner is a co-conspirator and a fraudster in appearing before Congress to try to get it to agree to changing the law, knowing full well that the Congress will have great difficulty conceding that it should water down Basel-II – not least because if that were to happen, all foreign banks would be precluded from dealing with the US banks under the Bank for International Settlements-brokered arrangements. Therefore, the appearance before the House Banking Committee of Geithner and Bernanke to argue for changes which Congress cannot in all ‘conscience’ (sic) possibly deliver, represented in itself a fraudulent charade.

HOW THE CHINESE REACT TO THIS U.S. SCAM IS WHAT MATTERS NOW
As we understood the situation on 25th March, the Chinese parties appear not yet to have decided how to react to this latest American official provocation. However there seems every prospect that if this hideous logjam is not broken, the Chinese will recall all debts from the dollar system. They are also talking in public about the dollar being replaced by a new international currency based on the International Monetary Fund’s Special Drawing Right (SDR) composite unit – something that cannot possibly be agreed overnight, and will take a long time to come to fruition, if it ever does. But open Chinese official talk along these lines is intended to raise the temperature of the ‘debate’,

Once again, diplomatic behaviour seems quite out of place here. It would be preferable for the Chinese to publicise what has been going on. The Editor cannot see why the power of genuine publicity cannot be put to good use in intergovernmental relations.

Instead of fighting these swine behind diplomatic cover stories such as the tensions in the South China Sea, why not go public with the necessary criminal information?

In the unlikely event of this further unsolicited advice being taken, the proper course of action must be to publicise precise details of the relevant aborted transactions (dates, precise times, references and so on) so that nothing can be challenged.

Given the extreme gravity of these abominations, publicising them might do more to bring these American official crooks and criminal banking enterprises to their senses (if they have any) than any other course the Chinese could take.

G-20 MEETING IN LONDON WILL BE A FLOP
By extension, we can now safely predict that the next conference on the calendar, the Group of 20 meeting in the London area, will be a bitter flop. The wronged Chinese parties have no incentive left to assist these US criminals out of the mess they have willfully expanded under President B. Obama. And here’s another point to bear in mind.

These crooks are only too delighted when observers such as the Editor of this service focus, for instance, on the Madoff scandal, the Stanford dimension, or the Friehling indictment.

Why? Because these developments represent, for these criminal operatives, something called COLLATERAL DAMAGE. They couldn’t care less about Madoff or his victims, or about Stanford ditto (although they took good care to murder Stanford’s sole accountant on 1st January 2009, the day after his contract with Stanford expired). So, while we are publishing reports about these PAST Fraudulent Finance operations, the criminalists in power and in the criminal banks are well away with their new Fraudulent Finance operations.

CRIMINALISTS DON’T CARE ABOUT PONZI VICTIM SUICIDES
The other day the Editor received yet another email from one of the 320,000 Ponzi victims, asking whether, in the Editor’s opinion, the money ‘due’ on the ‘humanitarian’ or ‘prosperity’ programs would ever be paid. In the first place, this is an unfair question: it is not the Editor’s responsibility to offer ‘opinions’ on other people’s problems (although the Editor does know the true answer to that question). But more to the point, the correspondent reminded the Editor of what he already knows – that many Ponzi victims have committed suicide, died in despair, suffered family breakdowns or other traumas as a direct consequence of the despicable behaviour of these criminals, who appear to have stolen ALL their money – consistently with the classic Ponzi scamming model. We started explaining this in the first quarter of 2007, long before the word Ponzi became almost as common as deleted expletives following the Madoff explosion: but the affected victims didn’t want to know.

But the point here is this: do these unspeakable criminals care a fig about the fact that an unknown number of these unfortunate people have committed suicide or died in despair?

Need we stress that the criminal operatives, having their consciences seared through with a hot iron, are completely indifferent to the suffering they have caused? True Christians know that these people will perish in hell for eternity – a fact that many of the perpetrators themselves also know full well, which is one reason why, psychologically, the fools think they have nothing left to lose by carrying on with their corrupt ‘business as usual’.

THE MAD INTENTION: TO MAKE THE ENTIRE DERIVATIVES SECTOR WHOLE AGAIN
With the Lombard Odier-wrapped illicit derivatives trading programme in full swing and being showered with what ‘new money’ the crooks have been able to generate and steal, the criminal official intention is to rebuild the broken derivatives sector, with the assistance of ‘bought and paid for’ corrupt hedge fund operators and money managers (not all of whom are professional sheisters obviously), and to keep the carousel going and building, fed with new money filched from gullible investors, whether borrowed on permissive terms from the Federal Reserve or not, with a view to making the entire derivatives mountain of around $700 trillion (excluding double-counting) ‘whole’ – notwithstanding the reality that hardly any of these derivatives ‘Structured Products’ contain ANY real value at all, since almost all of them are NON-RECOURSE.

This is all explained in the latest issue of International Currency Review, and also in Economic Intelligence Review [see second white panel], as well as in the four-page leaflet containing the three main charts which is being distributed in Washington, DC, and elsewhere.

All that our latest subscriber printed materials do is to point out the stark reality of the fact that these false constructs (derivatives) are by definition totally fraudulent and devoid of value, so that retrospective attempts sponsored by the demented US Government to pass off that they contain value represents a massive, unprecedented fraud on the US taxpayer and future generations of Americans, while at the same time:

• Guaranteeing the accumulation of new mountains of debt arising from the Federal Reserve’s outrageous lending for speculative purposes; and:

• Guaranteeing a hyperinflation. Pundits are now suggesting that this phenomenon will emerge in several years’ time. The Editor’s view is that the choices made by the new bunch of fantasists in charge in Washington are so extreme, So damaging, so wrong-headed and so destabilising, that the hyperinflationary pressures will become apparent much sooner than that – WITHOUT delivering any ‘beneficial’ impact to the ‘real’ economy in the interim.

IS THIS BEING DONE ON PURPOSE?
The decisions made since Obama took office are SO perverse that one is tempted to join those who insist that this is all being done on purpose. The correct answer to such empty speculation is that we don’t know whether this is the case or not.

On the basis of the Christian knowledge that the devil is the author of all lies and confusion, the Editor’s view is that these operatives are wallowing in devilish confusion and have fallen prey to diversionary, self-defeating, complex, elaborate ‘whizz-kid’, knee-jerk ‘solutions’ in a desperate bid to ‘resolve’ the colossal problem created by the corrupted money center banks themselves, which were indulging, until mid-September 2008, in unproductive, illicit, off-balance sheet speculative activity on a scale with no historical precedent.

That suggests that if it had not been for such wasteful,unproductive, untaxed, off-balance sheet speculation, many of the banks in question would be surplus to requirements.

According to Story’s First Law, ‘all organisations are run for the benefit of those who are running the organisation’. This, of course, explains why, deprived of the toys that they were playing with, the banks went on strike and have been hoarding and stealing funds ever since – precisely with a view to restarting the speculative, win-win Ponzi Fraudulent Finance that they were wallowing in prior to mid-September 2008, instead of focusing primarily on lubricating the real economy.

BANKS SUPERFLUOUS TO REQUIREMENTS
The smarter solution would have been to allow more than just Lehman Brothers to go to the wall. Wall Street, where the wall is, is supposed to believe in free markets, with no participant being subsidised at the expense of other participants. The new, decadent, twist is that all the relevant participants can have their corporate snouts in the trough, and to hell with the hyperinflationary consequences. The Wall Street institutions and the satellite hedge funds and other intermediaries, along with the banks, are all being subsidized AT THE EXPENSE OF THE REAL ECONOMY.

• It’s called a banker’s ramp.

IT’S NOT ‘THE ECONOMY, STUPID’: ITS ‘THE DERIVATIVES, STUPID’
And to cover all this up, the United States is now governed by a man who takes his cue from Fidel Castro and President Chavez. He thinks his gift of the gab can be relied upon somehow to save him from the devastating and very rapidly approaching adverse consequences of his perverse, wrong-headed decisions, which are holding up the recovery of the Rest of the World.

And he is using this gift of the gab to LIE to the American people that this is all about reviving the real economy, when it isn’t. It’s all about reviving the fraudulent derivatives sector carousel.

AND NOTHING ELSE.

• CMKM UPDATE:
The previously reported theft of the $12.8 billion was orchestrated to achieve three objectives at the same time:

• To dissolve the multi-billion dollar claims and Court Order related to CMKM et al, and to make it clear that the CMKM Attorney(s) have signed the appropriate documentation to secure the funds held at the Depositary Trust Clearing Corporation under Court Order, and STEAL THE MONEY.

• To satisfy the ‘Payee’ et al, by authorising and signing a Presidential Executive Order (15th January 2009) – thereby circumventing public disclosure (and possible physical threat when George W. Bush was no longer President of the United States) and STEAL THE MONEY.

• To STEAL the $12.8 billion via Presidential Order/Court Claim – and funds sitting under the control of the DTCC – with the intent to send the money to Carlyle et al., without any repercussions – via Bank of America, Tyler, Texas, and then to Canada.

• LORD MYNERS UPDATE:
Some time ago we reported that Lord Myners, the City (of London) Minister in the Gordon Brown Government, had publicly suggested that City bankers engaged in Fraudulent Finance should be prosecuted. We then received a prompt message to the effect that ‘they’ would be grateful if we did not ‘go on about this’. There was no explanation, as usual.

It has since emerged that Lord Myners, who was selected to head up the British Government’s investigation into tax havens, chaired a hedge fund group operating through Jersey, Channel Islands. Jersey is used by fund managers to keep profits offshore so as to avoid British tax.

Before becoming a Government Minister, Lord Myners was appointed to head a company that took over Liberty Ermitage Jersey, controlling investments worth about $2.0 billion. Myners made his fortune with Gartmore, a prominent City fund management outfit, the Jersey, C.I., offshoot of which handled millions of pounds for more than 4,100 overseas investors.

Lord Myners was also involved with Aspen Re, a reinsurance firm located in Bermuda, thereby saving large sums in tax annually. A UK Treasury spokesman said on 23rd March:

‘All of his past business roles are a matter of public record and he has made a full declaration of the interests. The experience he brings continues to be hugely valuable to the Government at a time when we are working to restore and rebuild the banking sector’.

In other words, the British Government is relying, in part, on the toxic experience of a hedge fund manager, familiar with the Fraudulent Finance sector of course, to advise them on how to REBUILD the banking sector which has been devastated by its indulgence in Fraudulent Finance.

Maybe when he called for British bankers who have been engaged in Fraudulent Finance to be prosecuted, he was going too far for the likes of certain interests. It is normally the case that these people reinvent themselves as ‘whiter than white’ (‘Blankfeinism’), but it would appear that Lord Myners’ linen might not necessarily emerge gleaming white from the wash.

APPENDIX ONE:
Observations from The New York Times on the latest instalment of ‘Geithnerism’ [25th March 2009]:

• Can banks that received Government bailouts use taxpayer money to bid on toxic assets, in the hope of making a profit? [Correct answer: NO – Ed.].

• Can banks sell some assets and then use the proceeds, leveraged by generous Government financing, to buy more of the same? [Correct answer: NO – Ed.].

• Might investment houses be tempted to overpay, if doing this buoys up the value of their own investments? [TARP provides for an Oversight Review Committee with clawback powers to compel restitution if too much is paid. This explains why Goldman Sachs is rushing to pay back the billions it received from the Government so that it is not bound by the TARP restrictions. No-one is asking about ‘source of funds’: whence the Goldman billions for repaying the Government? – Ed.].

• In the end, it will be the taxpayer who will be largely footing the bill.
[Not ‘in the end’: straight away – Ed.].

• Joseph E. Stiglitz, a Nobel Prize-winning economist, in an interview with Reuters, called the program “very badly flawed” and said it offered “perverse incentives” that amounted to “robbery of the American people”. [Couldn’t have said it better ourselves – Ed.].

• Bert Ely, a prominent banking consultant, said investors would be cautious because many crucial details were still missing – the size and terms of loans they would receive from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, for example, and the amount of equity they would be allowed to put in, and whether banks would be allowed to walk away if they did not like the price at auction. “Today we know a lot more than we did yesterday, right?” Mr Ely said. “I’m being facetious!”.

• Many questioned the auction mechanism to sell toxic assets off from banks’ balance sheets. Price, most experts agree, is the biggest sticking point. The banks want to sell high. Potential investors want to buy low. [There is STILL no indication of how the fake ‘assets’ that are to be bought initially, will be priced – Ed.].

• Banking executives said that that their institutions would not want to unload ‘assets’ at fire-sale prices, a step that would compel many of the banks to raise sizeable amounts of additional capital. [Even though ‘fire-sale’ prices would be much too expensive given that the assets are fraudulent to begin with and therefore worth $0. $0 + $0 = $0, usually – Ed.].

• Under the accounting rules, banks must carry securities on their books at market prices. Most financial firms have already marked down these ‘assets’ to prices that might be low enough to lure buyers. But banks need not carry ordinary loans at market value. Instead, they are allowed to hold them at their higher values until they are repaid. So, for many commercial banks, selling loans now, at distressed prices would almost certainly lead to large losses. Such losses might raise questions about how some banks will fare in a so-called stress test that Federal regulators are in the process of applying to about 20 lenders.

“I don’t see how they are going to get the banks to sell”, said an executive at a large bank.
There are going to be substantial write-downs taken to get them off the books”.
[In other words, ‘Geithnerism’ CHANGES NOTHING. It doesn’t ‘amend reality’].

INTENTION HAD BEEN TO GET STARTED WITH CHINESE MONEY
After the Chinese parties had made the grave mistake of caving in to cynical pressure from the US authorities to participate in the latest instalment of ‘Geithnerism’, the Chinese would presumably have indicated their willingness for some of their funds to be used to purchase ‘toxic’ assets. The banks would have said: ‘But at what price?’ The Chinese would have responded: ‘Well if you don’t know the start-up buying price, we want our money back’. At which point the banks said: NO WAY.

APPENDIX TWO [excerpted from the report dated 24th March 2009]:
FACE-TO-FACE EXCHANGE BETWEEN PRESIDENT OBAMA AND THE QUEEN

Her Majesty: Good morning, Mr President, how very nice to meet you.

President Obama: It’s a pleasure to be here, Your Majesty.

HMQ: Mr President, I was concerned to hear about a small matter of $52 billion of my guarantees that apparently went missing recently.

PO: I understand that these were restored, M’am.

HMQ: Yes, but why were the guarantees diverted or stolen in the first place? Were any of my guarantees used for purposes for which they were not intended?

PO: I don’t know M’am. I imagine not.

HMQ: Mr President, you are aware, are you not, that after my LOAN funds within a total amount of $6.2 trillion languished within your banking system within the Treasury Custodial Account network at several money center banks for 19 months, to no avail, I was compelled, on 29th January 2009, to order the withdrawal of these funds, which were made available via the Bank of England on 19th-20th June 2007 to finance the Group of Seven-Approved Dollar System Refunding Programme by means of transparent private market trading transactions?

PO: I am, M’am.

HMQ: Mr President, are you aware of the REASON that I had to order these funds to be withdrawn?

PO: Not entirely, Your Majesty. Please explain.

HMQ: Mr President, when you toured European countries last year, you signed documents in which, I understand, you pledged to release all the blocked or hijacked funds and to proceed, if I am not mistaken, with the G-7-Approved private sector Refunding Programme. I had been led to believe that, in the light of your undertakings, you would indeed honour your commitments.

PO: My advisers decided that I should adopt alternative strategies, I am afraid.

HMQ: But Mr President, a signed commitment is a signed commitment, you know! Furthermore, my own expert advisers inform me that the ‘alternative strategies’ that your officials have adopted are designed to revalidate and revalue fundamentally worthless false derivative ‘assets’ while at the same time accumulating vast new mountains of real debt with which generations of Americans will be burdened in the future – a state of affairs which could have been entirely avoided if you had implemented the Group of Seven-Approved Dollar System private sector Refunding Programme for which I provided the necessary funds on LOAN, and which you undertook to do last year.

PO: Unfortunately, M’am, I was advised that our banks would not be prepared to cooperate in the proposed G-7-Approved private sector Refunding Programme.

HMQ: But Mr President, you carry the privilege of being the most powerful human being on earth! You have the power to insist upon the implementation of what was agreed by the world’s leading financial powers in 2007 and 2008! In addition, I made available a very large sum of money pro bono publico on a LOAN basis to finance this project, which I told the Group of Seven powers in 2007 was necessary ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’. Moreover the Group of Seven-Approved private sector Refunding Plan would have cost the US Treasury NOTHING, while showering it with windfall tax revenues for a long time to come! What on earth persuaded you to disregard this very simple and straightforward solution to your problems, which are OUR problems, too?

PO: Uh, I hear what you say, M’am. It looks as though the various patchwork schemes developed by Timothy Geithner are going nowhere anyway. I’ll reconsider the situation.

HMQ: Ah, but Mr President, as you know my LOAN funds were withdrawn on 29th January after it had become clear that your Administration was not about to honour its undertakings in this regard. I am advised that there is now a proposal that the G-7-Approved Refunding Programme should be run out of London. Very conveniently, there is a provision in British tax law whereby funds that are resident within the British jurisdiction for 24 hours, are taxable.

My Government finds it most attractive that windfall tax accruals should arise from such ongoing, transparent on-the-books trading activity. Of course, since the Refunding Programme will remain an American private sector operation, your Treasury will likewise receive immense ongoing accruals from tax. So, by running the transparent private sector Refunding Programme from London, we will be able to help you, after all. Don’t you think the daffodils in my garden are gorgeous this year?

PO (looking out of the Palace window at the magnificent display of British daffodils): Yes, Your Majesty, they are gorgeous. Don’t you think so, Michelle?

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. Some versions have a ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

OBAMA BEING USED AS A FALSE FRONT BY THE CROOKS

THE $14 TRILLION DOES NOT BELONG TO THE UNITED STATES

Friday 30 January 2009 03:00

• THE OBAMA TREASURY HAS NOT DELIVERED

• GREENSPAN INTERFERES, THE STEALING CONTINUES

• TWO MAIN REASONS WHY THE STEALING HAS NOT STOPPED UNDER OBAMA

• THE PRESIDENT HAS CAREFULLY REFRAINED FROM MINCING HIS WORDS

• THE MONEY DOES NOT BELONG TO THE UNITED STATES

• THE STEEP PRICE FOR THIS ODIOUS ONGOING CRIMINALITY MAY BE PAID

• A FEW TIMELY FACTUAL REMINDERS

• ATTEMPT TO GAG US FROM REPORTING UK FRAUDULENT FINANCE DEVELOPMENTS

• THE ‘NO-ONE COULD HAVE PREDICTED THIS’ LIE

• BLANKFEINISM AND BLATAVNIKISM

• BLANKET OF SILENCE ON THE DEMAND FOR $230 TRILLION

• APPENDIX ONE: THE CARLYLE GROUP

• APPENDIX TWO: IN MEMORIAM

• For a comprehensive debunking and takedown of the geomasonic New World Order, please order the Editor’s book The New Underworld Order, available from this combined website.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

• The CONTACT US facility is found in the red box throughout this combined website.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• Please Make a Donation to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing global financial corruption investigations, which have turned the whole world upside down and have exposed the corruption which was intended to enable the geocriminalist syndicate to seize the wealth of the entire world. These people have finally been more or less completely stopped in their tracks as a consequence of these exposures. Your assistance will be sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. The Editor’s $35,000 Wanta bail-out money was not repaid and so has been stolen. It will be collected in due course and the thief will be appropriately dealt with, having so far taken no steps at all to repay the Editor’s loan funds, which should have been remitted on 11th June 2007.

• See the second white panel for details of our latest distributed intelligence publications.

• Subscriptions by serious observers and analysts to our services may be placed via this website.

• NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

London, 30th January 2009:

THE OBAMA TREASURY HAS NOT DELIVERED
Although President Obama has been reported to us (repeatedly) as requiring the release of the Refunding and Settlements funds, the funding has not been released. Although Robert Armenta and Christopher J. McCurdy, of the New York Fed were arrested as reported in the preceding analysis, and other senior people have also been arrested, the releases have not transpired.

Although Neil Bush, we now understand, obtained access to the stolen $12.8 billion, and despite the fact that on 27th, 28th and 29th January we were specifically told that the same crooks were attempting to steal funds, that Dr Alan Greenspan, acting on instructions from Bush 41 and Bush 43, had been told (quote) ‘if you do this again you will be eliminated’ (unquote), and criminal operatives inside the US Treasury were (we were told) given the same warning, the main funds have not been released. Although the newly appointed US Director of National Intelligence (Admiral Blair*), Office of Naval Intelligence, was reported to us to have ‘signed off’ in accordance with President Obama’s wishes, the main funds have not been released.

*This is no surprise. Blair was at Oxford, as an ONI trainee under cover as a Rhodes Scholar, at the same time as Clinton. The ONI are suspected of operating a virulent blackmail campaign against one or more high-level personages in the United Kingdom. The Editor suspects that this factor is part of a cobweb of blackmail which the US criminal intelligence community thinks it can sustain
in order to hold on to funds that have been stolen [see below]. That’s what it thinks.

GREENSPAN INTERFERES, THE STEALING CONTINUES
On 28th January, notwithstanding the new broom at the White House, the arch-crook Greenspan interfered with the releases as reported above, with the transaction being stopped as a result.

The bank refused to accept the transfer and bankers on each side of the Atlantic were arrested.

As noted above, Greenspan’s minions at the Treasury were given the same warning as Greenspan.

TWO MAIN REASONS WHY THE STEALING HAS NOT STOPPED UNDER OBAMA
There are, broadly speaking, two main reasons why these maniacs have continued their stealing operations under the nose of President Barack Obama, who we understand on good authority has made his requirements on this score crystal clear [see above]:

• The Fraudulent Finance criminalists have assumed that they can leverage the situation so that the derivatives Ponzi scamming operations continue as though there had been no discontinuity.

• The Bush/Baker/Clinton Fraudulent Finance Nexus have colossal financial obligations that they cannot meet, so they are continuing to try to steal the funds in order (a) to meet those obligations, and (b) to annexe them for use as platforms for their continued Fraudulent Finance intentions.

A list of Carlyle’s personnel is annexed to this report as Appendix One.

This list provides some idea of the enormous problems these people face. In a Ponzi scam, new money is continually necessary to pay previous obligations. Derivatives activity is based upon the classic Ponzi Scheme model, as will be explained with the benefit of flow-chart diagrams in the forthcoming issue of our financial journal, International Currency Review. ALL these scams are based upon the classic primitive Ponzi Scheme or Pyramid Selling model.

THE PRESIDENT HAS CAREFULLY REFRAINED FROM MINCING HIS WORDS
President Obama’s public statements have explicitly indicated, in translation, that the greed of Wall Street and therefore Fraudulent Finance, and the complacency and co-conspiratorial behaviour of corrupt US officials and legislators, are SPECIFICALLY responsible for this crisis.

This crisis is a SYSTEMIC FRAUDULENT FINANCE CRISIS first and foremost. All commentary and analyses that sidestep this reality are misleading and go nowhere.

This message was explicitly repeated when the President addressed a powerful group of American businessmen on 28th January, when, illustrating that he has his priorities straight, he advised them that men and women are returning to their homes to confront their spouses with the news that they have been fired, as a specific consequence of the unfettered greed of Wall Street scamsters and plutocratic investors playing around with speculative leveraged Fraudulent Finance transactions, and of the behaviour of ‘Washington’. No-one except the perpetrators and people who haven’t woken up from their political prejudices dissents from this view, anywhere in the world.

The Editor has just, at ten minutes past midnight (29th/30th January), received a distressed call from a lady in California who notified him that bureaucrats in certain State of California offices are, as we speak, engaged in massive fraudulent operations in connection with foreclosures affecting large numbers of citizens. The lady was extremely distressed, poor soul, but the Editor managed to tell her that he personally guarantees to publicise this criminality as soon as the necessary detailed information has been provided. Mr Obama needs to know about these scams, as well.

Unfortunately, it would appear that the new President, whose words can hardly be faulted so far as the financial crisis and its causes are concerned, is being used by the familiar unscrupulous forces as a foil behind which they have intended to continue with their Fraudulent Finance ops. If this is correct, then of course what we have here is another example of the standard modus operandi of double-mindedness: facing both ways. While the President embarks upon domestic and foreign political initiatives, the financial crooks think they can continue with their criminal operations.

THE MONEY DOES NOT BELONG TO THE UNITED STATES
But regrettably for the reprehensible serial scam artistes, the perpetuators of this Grandfather of all fraud scandals have forgotten the following PERTINENT, BASIC FACTS OF LIFE:

• THE $14 TRILLION DOES NOT BELONG TO THE UNITED STATES.

• THE $14 TRILLION DOES NOT BELONG TO THE U.S. TREASURY.

• THE $14 TRILLION DOES NOT BELONG TO ANY OF THE WELL-KNOWN AMERICAN
CRIMINAL FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES IDENTIFIED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS IN THIS SERIES.

• THE $14 TRILLION BELONGS TO FOREIGN POWERS AND WAS MADE AVAILABLE INTER
ALIA TO REFUND THE DOLLAR SYSTEM BY GENERATING REVENUE IN THE PRIVATE
SECTOR AS DESCRIBED IN OUR REPORTS, AND TO FINANCE CERTAIN SETTLEMENTS.

• THE FOREIGN POWERS WILL NO LONGER BE PREPARED TO LEAVE THESE FUNDS IN THE
HANDS OF AN OBAMA TREASURY THAT IS HELL-BENT ON CONTINUING THE FRAUDULENT
FINANCE CAROUSEL UNDER THE PRESIDENT’S NOSE.

• BLACKMAILING THE G-7, THE QUEEN AND THE ENTIRE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY BY PERSISTING WITH A DELIBERATE FAILURE TO DEPLOY FUNDS THAT DO NOT BELONG TO THE UNITED STATES, FOR THE PURPOSES FOR WHICH THEY WERE PLACED, WILL NOT ‘FLY’ ANY LONGER, EVEN UNDER PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA.

THE STEEP PRICE FOR THIS ODIOUS ONGOING CRIMINALITY MAY BE PAID
Since the Obama Treasury has failed to deliver and none of the assurances received have any more credibility than those promulgated by the decadent Paulson Treasury, the appropriate price for this unparalleled criminal intransigence, which the foreign powers in question have leaned over backwards to avoid, may be paid.

A very widely promulgated assertion, believed to have been inspired by the Fraudulent Finance specialists in the Treasury and their co-conspirators externally, that the releases will not be taking place ‘until mid-February’ which morphed later into ‘or even later’, has clearly signalled that these people have not understood anything, leading to the conclusion that they will need to be made to pay the price of their continuing defiance.

And the price will be exceedingly painful, we understand.

A FEW TIMELY FACTUAL REMINDERS
Now for some subsidiary FACTS which appear to have been conveniently forgotten as well:

• The ‘Reagan-Mitterrand Protocols’ fund amount is of the order of $270 billion.

• An intelligence officer who accepts a freely given loan of $35,000 plus interest for two years, paid to get him out of Probation in order to assist towards the resolution of these matters, but who fails to take any steps at all to pay it back, not even writing a letter of intent to that effect, is not a fit person to handle vast sums of money, and could never be trusted with LOAN funds.

• The LOAN funds made available by Her Majesty The Queen on behalf of The Group of
Seven Financial powers, as reconfirmed in 2007 and 2008, will not be taken into the US
Treasury where they could be exploited and yet again illegally used as base for further
Fraudulent Finance operations. This has been the intention, but it will not be permitted.

• See above.

ATTEMPT TO GAG US FROM REPORTING UK FRAUDULENT FINANCE DEVELOPMENTS
Separately, a few days ago, the Editor was asked: would he hold back on any further comment arising from Lord Myners’ belated observation, reported in the preceding analysis, that those engaged in FRAUD in the banking sector in Britain should be prosecuted.

We were about to add that the Conservative Party leader, David Cameron, interviewed on Sky News on 26th January, elaborated:

‘We need to look at the behaviour of banks and bankers, and where such people have behaved inappropriately, that needs to be identified, and if anyone has behaved criminally, in my view, there is a role for the criminal law. I don’t understand why in this country the regulatory authorities seem to be doing so little to investigate it, whereas in America, they are doing quite a lot’.

There followed hearings before the House of Commons Treasury Select Committee, at which the remarks purveyed for the benefit of uncomprehending MPs by a batch of Hedge Fund managers made it crystal clear that these unreformed operators have every intention of continuing their Fraudulent Finance Ponzi derivatives operations as though there has been no discontinuity.

• The MPs, of course, tended not to ask the right questions.

So, THAT was the reason, then, that the Editor of this service was asked not to elaborate further on the remarks attributed to Lord Myners. Memorandum to whoever issued this instruction:

• DON’T BANK ON BEING ABLE TO STIFLE US EVER AGAIN.

THE ‘NO-ONE COULD HAVE PREDICTED THIS’ LIE
And the other day, the London Evening Standard, which is being bought by the KGB/GRU officer Lebedev, a pal of Mikhail Gorbachev, carried a headline to the effect that Gordon Brown had stated that ‘no-one could have predicted what has happened’, with reference to the global financial crisis that of course, as an intelligence officer, Mr Brown knows all about.

On 27th January, Ian Powell, UK Chairman and Senior Partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), stated: ‘Nobody could have prepared for the events we have witnessed over the last few months’.

• No further comment.

BLANKFEINISM AND BLATAVNIKISM
On 28th January, Steve Schwarzman, Chairman of Blackstone, the giant ‘private equity group’, said that ‘an almost incomprehensible’ amount of ‘cash’ had evaporated since the financial crisis took hold. He estimated that over the past five quarters, over 40% of the world’s wealth has been wiped out, although we think he was really referencing off-balance sheet Fraudulent Finance proceeds, when he said this at the World Economic Forum, a conspicuously German-Swiss-controlled event at which the so-called ‘Great and the Good’ (an inaccurate description) gather supposedly to map out the future for themselves and the whole of humanity. These people are suffering either from a form of convenient amnesia, or from an outbreak of ‘Blankfeinism’, defined as the mindset which can be deployed at the drop of a hat by perpetrators as they paint themselves whiter than white.

To the previous report’s segment about the Soviet criminalist KGB operative Leonid Blatavnik, to whom ABN Amro lent the princely sum of £2.5 billion, which the Royal Bank of Scotland is reported to have written off, we should add the further blast that Goldman Sachs lost $850 million on the collapse of Blatavnik’s LyondellBasell chemicals firm. Citibank lent this crook more than $1.0 billion as well. Given such madness (please refer back to the nasty detail about Blatavnik’s activities over Yugraneft, from the Norex case), it is no surprise that the successive waves of arrests that have afflicted the banking sector since the fall of 2007 have had little effect on the behaviour of these criminal enterprises. They are possessed of a mental illness inducing an urge for self-destruction.

BLANKET OF SILENCE ON THE DEMAND FOR $230 TRILLION
Following our report that a huge European institution which bought the clearing facilities from a huge US institution had DEMANDED the provision of the equivalent of one-third of the total value of derivatives contracts outstanding (one-third of about $700 trillion is about $230 trillion), a wall of silence has descended upon this critical matter. Obviously we know the names of the institutions concerned, and equally obviously we have necessarily refrained from revealing them.

The call reflected the fact that the big US Money Center institutions own the Depository Trust Clearing Corporation which guarantees (unbelievably) the derivatives contracts outstanding.

The reason we mention this again is that we find it incomprehensible that, notwithstanding such dreadful information, the Editor has, on 29th January in particular, been bombarded with more verbal dissimulation and claptrap about what is to happen concerning the Settlements and the Refinancing Programme than ever before. None of the stuff that the Editor has been told by the various sources in question has been accurate. It is all uninformed, deliberately obfuscatory ventilation bearing NO RELATION TO THE CENTRAL REALITY, which is this:

• THE MONEY DOES NOT BELONG TO THE UNITED STATES, THE U.S. TREASURY CANNOT, ON THE BASIS OF EVIDENCE UNDER PRESIDENT OBAMA TO DATE, BE TRUSTED TO HANDLE IT CORRECTLY, so the necessary, overdue and painful price for this intransigence may be paid.

• If $14.0 trillion of your money, including LOAN funds, had been stolen, what would YOU do?

APPENDIX ONE: THE CARLYLE GROUP
Revealing the immense international reach of this vast operation:

‘Investment professionals’ working with The Carlyle Group worldwide, are listed in alphabetical order below. In 2008, The Carlyle Group had asserted in its publicity materials that, as one of the world’s largest private equity firms, it had more than $89.3 billion under management, operating 64 funds focusing on buyouts, growth capital, real estate and leveraged finance.

This list is compiled from Carlyle’s own published information:

Adachi, Tamotsu
Adams, Jamie
Aguila, Javier
Akerson, Daniel F.
Albright, Jr., Raymond J.
Ali, Hafez M.
Allardice III, Robert B.
Alter, Mark L.
Alverson, Harry L.
Amin, Vipul H.
Amos, Christopher A.
Anderson, James D.
Ankerbrandt, Kristen
Araki, Tsutomu
Ardagna, Roberto
Asakura, Haruyasu
Atkins, Colin
Attwood, Jr., James A.
Audagna, Guido
Avila, Joaquin
Axelrod, Lana
Bach, Joseph
Badalyan, Armine
Badham. Paxton
Bagatelas, Paul
Bai, Xiao-Bing
Bailey, Stephen W.
Bain, Zeina J.
Baird, Dayne
Balaji, Anita
Balasubrahmanyan, Anand
Balint, David
Barker, R. Pace
Bastianpillai, Anjali
Bayazid, Wael O.
Bechtel, Karen H.
Begelman, Ryan M.
Bentley, Pam
Benway, Aaron
Bernasek, Brian A.
Best, Mark D. W.
Bhargava, Sameer
Bieligk, Wesley
Bleiberg, Gary A.
Blades, Geoff
Bobo, Cedric L.
Bobrowska-Jarxabek, Malgorzata
Böhm, Gregor P.
Boisture, W.W.
Bouffard, Lauren A.
Bourcereau, Chloë
Bourgeois, Sebastien
Boyer, Matthew P.
Brady, Paul A.
Breaban, Catalin
Bress, Joe Z.
Brettell, Ryan R.
Brewer, Ryan M.
Brown, Pauline J.
Brown, Robert D.
Browne, Julian
Bruning, Timothy J.
Buchwald. Adam M.
Bullis, Kent
Burgess, Andrew R.
Burkart, Frazer P. J.
Burr, James F.
Buser, Curt
Busson, Paulo
Bylin, Jonathan M.
Byun, Eric Hyun-Sup
Cabral, Kathryn M.
Cagney, William
Canann, Brian T.
Caraffa, Massimiliano
Carson, lee H.
Cashion, Allen L.
Catania. Claudio
Cha, Joseph H.
Chan, Neville
Chang, Catherine
Chang, Herman H.
Chang, Hsien C.
Chang, Richard
Chang, William
Chase, Brian F.
Chen, Grace
Chen, Han
Chen, Ruoxi
Chen, Sunny S.
Chen, Yu
Chesley, John
Cheung, Bill
Chin, Vernon
Choi, Sung Yong
Chopra, Raghav
Chueca, Fernando
Chung, Andrew J. (1)
Chung, Joo-Yong
Clare, Peter J.
Coburn, Brooke B.
Cochais-Widmer, Véronique
Cohen, Erez
Colas, Benoit
Colby, Jonathan E.
Conway, Jr., William E.†
Corbett, Bryan N.
Corcoran, Thomas A.
Cottrell, Matthew
Coxon, Robert
Crowe, Zachary D.
D’Aniello, Daniel A.
Daher, Oussama
Dalal, Alekh N.
Daniel, David B.
Darman, Will
Das, Alpana
Dave, Ami
Davis, Seth A.
De Benedetti, Marco
De Pablo, Javier
Debetencourt, Nicolas J.
Defix, Agnes
Deldag, Can
Dengla, Manoj K.
Desai, Nilesh
Deshayes, Benjamin
Desplanches, Pierr-Olivier
Deupree, A. reed
Di Bernardo, Aldo
Dippel, Thorsten
Dolan, Philip B.
Dove, Robert
Dwivedi, Jitij
Dyer, Campbell R.
Easton, Robert
Eatanabe, Yusuke
Eckman, John D.
Edwards, Bill
El-Jeaan, Bader A.
El-Khatib, Hassan M.
Ellis, III, Thomas F.
Emore-Jones, Katherine
Enright, Corinne Casacio
Epps, Sarah R.
Esteban, Pedro de
Falcone, Valeria
Falézan, Franck
Farcasanu, Dan A.
Farscht, Russel C.
Feng, Janine
Ferguson, Jeffrey W.
Finelli, Francis A.
Finn, Christopher
Fitzgerald, Ashley
FitzGerald, David J.
Flaherty, John A.
Flammarion, Noémie
Föller, Bastienne
Fonseca, Rodrigo
Foo, Eliza
Forbes, Christian V.
Foss, Christopher
Foussé, Thomas
Friedland, Ari
Frisby, Scott J.
Frist, Jr., W. Harrison
Fujimoto, Takashi
Fujiwara, Maki
Fujiyama, Ian
Furfaro, Erica
Gago, Brice
Galante, Jacques V.
Garrigan, Thomas P.
Gaur, Manish
Gerchow, Karl
Gershenson, Michael D.
Gerstner, Jr., Louis V.
Giuliano, Louis J.
Giuliante, Rosina L.
Glasford, Amiko D.
Glavin, Martin
Glück, Hartmut A.
Gold, Barry P.
Goldfarb, Alan S.
Goldsmith, Caroline
Gozycki, Michael G.
Grady, Robert E.
Gray, Gina
Gray, Stephen C.
Graziano, Glori Holzman
Greco, Ilaria
Greenwood, William F. (2)
Gresh, Jamie
Grippi, James M.
Guler, Alp
Gupta, Amish V.
Gupta, Rajeev
Guptsa, Ankur
Guy, Janusz
Gwak, Daniel
Haaz, Jennifer S.
Hadi, Genghis
Hadley, Michael
Han, Frank
Hanan, Marcelo
Hance, James H,, Jr. (3)
Hance, Jr., James H.
Hancock, henry
Hanniganb, Charles G.
Hanreider, Wolfgang
Harris, John G.
Harris, Mark
Harris, Ryan A.
Hart, Jason P.
Hayashi, Satoru
Hayden, Parker
Hayhurst, Brian W.
He, george X.
He, Jim Z.
He, Sean
Helmers, Leo
Helmi, Angie
Herman, Bohuslav
Hirano, Masao
Hodges, Christopher J.
Hodges, Robert
Holert, Blair
Hollin, Stephanie J.
Holt, Allan M.
Hong, Ellen
Horbach, Sandra J.
Hou, Yi
Hunter, Matthew D.
Huyette, H. Scott
Ido, Takeshi
Iijima, Hisao
Inoue, Yoichi
Isayama, Takeshi
Isono, Taji
Jaber, Robbie
Jagannath, Ram M.
Jang, Robert
Jaroszewski, Szymon
Jayaraman, Karthic
Je, Hyunjoo
Jenkins, D. Scott
Jiang, Tony
Johnson, Mark
Johnston, Brannan
Johnston, William P.
Jones, Hayden R.
Jumper, John P.
Kacprzyk, Aleksander
Kang, Benjamin
Karan, Ashish
Karimi, Hassan
Karpinski, Tomasz
Kasser, Susan B.
Kataky, Gemma
Kaul, Rakesh K.
Kaul, Sunil
Kawahara. Hiroshi
Kemlin, Alexis
Kenkare, Avinash A.
Kennard, William E.
Khanna, Dhalia A.
Khanna, Raghav
Khushalani, Rajesh R.
Kim, James Y.
Kim, Yong Hyun
Kingery, David
Klosterman, Patrick
Ko, Susan lee
Konarzewski, Rosanna
Kondo, Ryoko
Kong, Agnes
Kothan, Rahul
Kranz, Simone
Kreuzer, Florian D.
Krusius, Leo M.
Kuscuoglu, Cumhur
Kwon, Samuel H.
Kwun, John Il
Lam, David J.
Lam, Eric
Lambrecht, Olivier
Landrum, Lee
Lara, Jaime
Larocque, Jim E.
Lasocki, Vladimir
Ledford, Gregory S.
Lee, Brian K.
Lee, Cindy
Lee, Dorothy
Lee, Jason H.
Lee, Jessica Y.
Lee, Michael H.
Lee, Michael W.
Lee, William K.
Lerede, Kadvael
Leslie, Scott
Levitt, Arthur
Levy, Tom R.
Lewis, Duncan
Lewis, Rebecca
Li, Yong
Lin, Alex
Lin, Bruan D.
Lindström, Thomas
Lippman, Christopher S.
Lisman, Michael
Louw, Marcel
Loveridge, John L.*
Lu, Gavin
Lu, Simon
Lucas, Marilyn
Luo, Yi
Lupiani, Rachel L.
Ma, Steven Y.
MacDonald, Eilidh
MacDonald, Gregory A.
Machado, Eduardo
Machado, Guilherme
MacKenzie, Stuart J.
Madhany, Samira
Magram, David N.
Mailighetti, Luca
Maizener. Jean-Marie
Malvezzi, Francesco
Man, Edward
Marchick, David M.
Marino, Andrew
Martineau, Alexis
Marumo, Masato
Mase, Yusuke
Mason, Eric R.
Mathias, Edward J.
Matteson, Andrew J.
Mazaira, David
McCarter, Patrick R.
McGee, James
McLarty, Thomas F.
McMullan, William H.
McTernan, Neil
Mehta, Mukesh Gulraj
Meinel, Wulf
Mercer, Shaun
Merrill, Eliot P. S.
Meyer, Philip
Miller, Baylor
Miller, Jeb
Millet, Jean-Pierre
Millet, Jonathan
Minami, Rio
Mishriky, Amir F.
Mitchell, Heather
Mitsui, Maki
Mittl, Ralph F.
Moalemzadeh, Shary
Moffett, David M.
Mohta, Nikhil
Molinari, Francesco
Moore, Michael
Moore, Simon C.
Moosa, Nazo
Morgan, Kelsey
Morrison, Ryan C.
Murphy, Barbara
Murphy, Jeremiah P.
Murthy. Sundip
Musallam, Walid
Myrhofer, Thomas B.
Nagami, Yo
Narayanan, Shankar
Nasir, Firas
Natchwey, Peter H.
Nelsen, Brian D.
Newnam, Todd
Ng, Christina Shieu-weing
Ng, Jason W.
Nikodem, Gregory M.
Nimmer, Andrew M.
Nocen, Piotr K.
Nolting-Hauff, Georg
Nova, Guido Funes
Nunes, Paula
Nuruki, Kosuke
O’Brien, Philip
O’Mahony, Paul
O’Neil, Catlin
Obregon, Alberto Gomez
Obregon, Andres
Ofstein, Josh B.
Ogura, Jumpei
Oliver, Leigh
Ong, Harold B.S.
Orrbeck, Henrik
Otsuka, Hiroyuki
Owens, Stephen D.
Paarekh, Grishma
Pace, Linda
Palmer, Adam J.
Pan, Lina
Papkov, Irina
Parasuraman, Mahesh
Pardo, Maro
Parekh, Sumeet H.
Park, Sang Pil
Paul, Thaddeus A.
Pekala, Andrea L.
Pekmezovic, Adi
Peli, Edson
Pelka, Roman
Pellegrin, Guillaume
Penatti, Filippo
Peshkatari, Tomas
Petreschi, Olivier
Pike, Robert
Pinker, Jürgen
Pinto, Fernando
Pitre, Christine A.
Plackter, Richard
Plouffe, Hustin V.
Polito, Barbara
Poon, Alwin
Porter, Bryan
Powlowski, Anne-Sophie Aude
Preston, Alex H. M.
Pryor, Daniel A.
Qiu, Melody
Quarles, Randal K.
Quehl, Carsten
Qunash, Lubna
Rabaut, Thomas W.
Rakoto, Christiane
Rami, Neepa P.
Ramsay, Mike
Randazzo, Paul A.
Rasmussen, Michael B.
Ray, Thomas M.
Redett, John
Reis, Norbert
Relier-Dubosq, Blaise
Rella, Vincent M. (4)
Rensonnet, Damien
Reshamwala, Nikita P.
Revankar, Harris
Reynolds, Louis J.
Riban, Agnes
Robson, Fraser S.
Rock, John
Rohan, Jennifer
Rosenblum, Bruce E.
Rosengarten, Steve
Rosenthal, Stacy M.
Rossmann, Gregory J.
Rossolimo, Katherine
Rossotti, Charles O.
Roure, Sara
Rowe, Jenniefr L.
Rubinstein, David M.
Ruhlen, George
Ruiz, Gerardo
Sabet, Lori R.
Saito, Gentas
Samek, Edward V.
Sammons, Jay W.
Sanvicente, Karen
Saricoglu, Eren
Sarkozy, P. Olivier
Sarles, H. Jay*
Sasson, Eric E.
Sato, Atsushi
Schmidt, Jamie E.
Schoenfeld, Mark J.
Schultze, Dennis
Schuster, Michael C.
Schwartz, Ryan M.
Serur, Rebeca
Shang, Sally
Shao, Nicholas
Sharma, Anjum K.
Shevlet, Jr., James C.
Shore, Evan
Siew, Adrian M.
Siewert, Patrick T.
Simoni, Catherine
Singh, Devenjit
Singh, Parminder
Sistek, Robert M.
Siung, Jung Woo
Skoklund, Per
Smales, William O.
Song, Shirlene
Squier, David L.
Stacy, Eugene
Steadman, Amy
Steel, Charles R.
Sterchi, Louis
Sterenbery, Daniel
Sterling, Steven F.
Stewart, Michael D.
Stirling, Alex G.
Stomber, John C. (5)
Strassburger, Alexander H.
Stuckey, Robert G.
Sturiale, Nick
Sumner, Martin W.
Sun, Vion
Szu, Candice
Tadros, Ramsey
Taiko, Hironori
Takatsuki, Daisuke
Taniyama, Koichiro
Taylor, Brandon
Taylor, R. Keith
Terasaka, Reiji
Thorpe, Emma
Tidwell, Ken
Tokumo, Yuichi
Tokuyama, Akinari
Tomioka, Takaomi
Trozzo, Patrick (6)
Tsou, Rayne Wen-Tsui
Tung, David T. W.
Ullman, Christopher W.
Vagefi, Shahab
Valenzuela, Miguel
Vanness, Adam M.
Vetter, Brian
Vu, Michael
Wagenberg, Alex
Wagner, Elliot J.
Walker, Sam
Wand, Michael
Wang, Anne
Wang, Wei
Wang, Y. David
Washington, Marc
Watts IV, Claudius E.
Wen, David W.
Wen, Evie
Wengryn, Stephanie C.
Whang, Derek H.
Whiteman, Raymond A.
Willaims, James S.
Winokur, Rachel L.
Wise, Stephen H.
Wojtkowski, Ryszard
Writer, Lawrence D.
Wu, Sam
Wyard, Brett G.
Xiao, Feng
Xie, Ying Hai
Xu, Rose H.
Yamada, Kazuhiro
Yang, Ariana Yu Jia
Yang, Julia
Yang, Xiang-Dong
Yang, Yi
Ying, Alex S.
Yoshioka, Tadashi
Yoshizaki, Koichiro
Young, Ward
Youngkin, Glenn A.
Yuan, Nelson
Yusa, Nahoko
Zafrani, Jonathan
Zeluck, Gregory M.
Zhang, Elena
Zhang, Eric
Zulijani, Helis
Zupon, Michael J. (7)
Zwiener, David

References:
* Independent Director.
† Founding Partner and Managing Director.
(1). Principal focused on US real estate.
(2). Chief Dealer.
(3). Director and Chairman of the Board.
(4). Chief Accounting Officer and Controller.
(5). Non-voting Director and Chief Executive Officer,
President and Chief Investment Officer.
(6). Chief Risk Officer and Treasurer.
(7). Non-voting Director and Non-executive Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors.

The Carlyle Group states in its publicity materials that ‘in a world awash with information, insight is often in short supply. Carlyle’s edge is its ability to leverage [sic] the local insight of its investment professionals, collaborating across the firm’s many investment disciplines from deal sourcing and due diligence through portfolio development. More than 1,200 investors from 72 countries entrust Carlyle with their capital and their reputations’.

APPENDIX TWO: IN MEMORIAM

PROMINENT CRIMINALISM- AND EXPOSURE-RELATED ‘NEUTRALISATIONS’ REPORTED IN RECENT MONTHS, EXCLUDING AN UNKNOWN NUMBER OF BANKER ‘DISAPPEARANCES’
The following tragic deaths related to this crisis have been reported in the ‘mainstream’ media:

• Paulo Sergio Silva, aged 36, a trader working for the brokerage arm of the Brazilian banking congolmerate Itau, ‘shot himself in the chest’ during an afternoon trading session of the Sao Paulo commodities and futures exchange last November, stopping trading for 15 minutes.

• Kirk Stephenson, who helped start Luqman Arnold’s investment company Olivant Ltd. in London, committed suicide, a British coroner’s court decided in December 2008. Stephenson, 47, jumped in front of a train on 25th September 2008, at the railway station in Taplow, near Maidenhead, located 28 miles west of London. The train was travelling at 100 miles an hour.

• Alex Widmer, Chief Executive of Bank Julius Baer, Zürich, aged 52, was reported by Reuters on 5th December to have ‘committed suicide’. Two unnamed ‘independent’ sources were cited by the Swiss News website 20Minuten to have stated that the death was a suicide.

Swiss police refused to comment on the death. A bank spokesman, however, was careful to point out for public consumption that there was no link between Widmer’s death and the group’s current [sic] activities, but declined to give further details on the cause of Widmer’s death, saying it was a ‘private matter’. The operative word here was ‘current’, implying that Widmer had been involved in questionable activities in the past: and indeed, further enquiries by this service confirmed that this interpretation is correct. Market sources have advised the Editor of this service that ‘the top Julius Baer banker was killed and we know why’: other sources have stated unequivocally to us that this was a murder, associated with the elaborate cover-up, retribution and ‘neutralisation’ operations that are taking place in the context of the Settlements crisis.

• Gavin Macdonald, aged 47, a top mergers and acquisitions banker, was reported on Monday 8th December 2008 to have died ‘from a heart attack’ at the London offices of Morgan Stanley in Canary Wharf. However he died on the preceding Friday night, so that his death was not in fact announced for at least 56 hours. Macdonald was Global Head of Mergers and Acquisitions for the institution. In view of the fact that he died ‘on Friday night’, there was plenty of time for a ‘massaged line’ to have been developed to ‘explain’ his sudden death, which was attributed to ‘overwork’. Promptly on the Monday, Morgan Stanley’s CEO, John Mack, led tributes to the dead banker.

Mr Mack heads the institution within which a special suite devoted to the financing of terrorism, which we now refer to as the Terrorism Financing Center, is located. When the Provost Marshal attempted, with Department of Defense Internal Affairs assistance, to enter this room in October 2007, he was barred from entry on the orders of Vice President Cheney, to whom, ludicrously, he reported. You’ll have noted that THERE HAS BEEN NO DENIAL OF THIS INFORMATION – for the familiar reason that the intelligence, which came from the actual ensuing investigation, is true.
Macdonald would of course have been aware of the existence of the Terrorism Financing Center, and may well have been considered a prospective threat to the ongoing cover-up operations. Mr Mack’s oleaginous tributes to Gavin Macdonald need to be considered in the foregoing context.

• Christen Schnor, aged 49, a Danish-born senior executive with HSBC bank, was discovered on Wednesday afternoon 17th December hanging by a belt, naked, in the wardrobe of his £500-a-night suite at the Jumeriah Carlton Tower Hotel, Cadogan Place, in Knightsbridge, London, having also rented a £390-a-day apartment for his wife and two children in Lower Sloane Street, in the same upper-class area. Schnor worked at HSBC’s Canary Wharf office. This death resembles that of Amschel Rothschild who was discovered hanging in a high-class hotel in Paris on 11th July 1996.

• Non-banking death: Michael Connell, an IT expert said to have been directly implicated in the rigging of George W. Bush Jr.’s 2000 and 2004 elections (since the Republicans cannot ‘win’ US elections without rigging them these days, as previously explained, due to deliberately arranged demographic factors) was killed on 19th December when his single-engine private plane crashed three miles short of Akron airport. Mr Connell was reported to have told a close associate that he was afraid that George Bush and Vice President Cheney would “throw [him] under a bus”.

It had earlier been verified that Carl Rove had threatened Connell and his wife, Heather (sounds familiar?). Mr Connell had flown to a small airport outside Washington DC on 18th December 2008 for a meeting. On 31st October, Mr Connell had appeared before a Federal Judge in Ohio after being subpoenaed in a Federal lawsuit investigating the rigging of the 2004 election under Karl Rove’s direction. The Judge ordered Mr Connell to testify under oath at a deposition on 3rd November 2008, the day before the election.

The Bush White House was reported to have become extremely concerned that Mr Connell planned to divulge details of his secret illegal work for the White House. Heather Connell owns GovTech Solutions. Both GovTech and an IT firm called SmartTech of Chattanooga, TN, have been implicated in the rigging of the 2000 and 2004 elections and a White House email scandal.

In 2005, the US operative Andy Stephenson was poisoned with a substance capable of mimicking pancreatic cancer, after travelling the United States tirelessly exposing the wholesale falsification of election results using doctored software and rigged electronic voting machines, thus making a mockery of George W. Bush’s puffed-up boasting about ‘spreading democracy’ in the Middle East and elsewhere. Further exposure of this sub-scandal would be very liable to broaden and become engulfed in the colossal Fraudulent Finance unravelling that is taking place, which the criminalists are trying desperately to cover up, without success.

• René-Thierry Magon de la Villehuchet, 65, founding partner and CEO of Access International Advisors, was found dead with his wrists slashed on the morning of Tuesday 23rd December 2008, in his office at 509 Madison Avenue, New York. The French financier, an aristocratic society fund manager with a chateau in Brittany, was found at 7.50am with no pulse, in his office a couple of blocks from the Rockefeller Center. A spokeswoman for the New York medical examiner was careful to insist many hours later that it had not yet established the cause of death.

In other such cases, ‘sources’ have been in the habit of insisting that the death was a ‘suicide’.

The French financier employed a sizeable army of royally-connected ‘Alpine advisers’ to trawl the casinos, ski slopes and yacht clubs of Europe in frantic search of wealthy investors for investment in his fund, which in turn fed the demand for ‘replacement money’ for the Bernard L. Madoff Ponzi investment operations. M. de la Villehuchet’s connections and his own high aristocratic pedigree enabled him to tap into a rich seam of intermediaries who helped to secure funds on behalf of Access, for onward placement with Madoff.

His ‘advisors’ included Philippe Junot, first husband of Princess Caroline of Monaco, and Crown Prince Michael of Yugoslavia, described as an ‘investor relations executive’. Families said to have invested with the French financier included the Rothschilds, other European grandees, and heirs to the L’Oréal cosmetics fortune, especially 86-year-old Liliane Bettencourt, daughter of the L’Oréal SA founder, Eugene Schueller, who is reported to have invested part of her fortune estimated at $22.9 billion with Bernard L. Madoff through the dead French financier. The 86-year-old holds a 30% shareholding in L’Oréal SA, which is the world’s largest manufacturer and purveyor of cosmetics.
In a letter dated 12th December 2008 to clients, Access International Advisors stated that funds, including its LUXALPHA SICAV-American Selection, were invested solely with Bernard L. Madoff’s investment firm. Data compiled by Bloomberg indicated that it had $1.4 billion in assets as at 17th November 2008. Reporting M. de la Villehuchet’s death, The Daily Telegraph (on 24th December 2008) cited an anonymous source as stating that it was ‘highly likely’ that the French financier committed suicide, while a French newspaper report stated that he killed himself.

• Adolf Merckle, a German industrialist and billionaire, aged 74, was found on 5th January 2009 near railway tracks in southern Germany. The BBC reported on 6th January that Merckle had lost about 400 million Euros after wrong-way bets on Volkswagen shares. Herr Merckle‘s business interests included Phoenix Pharmahandel, a drugs wholesaler with annual sales of about 21 billion Euros, Ratiopharm, a generic drugs company with annual sales estimated at some 1.8 billion Euros, Heidelberg Cement, a cement firm with annual sales of 11+ billion Euros, the Kaessbohrer ski-slope equipment firm with sales of 183 million Euros, and VEM, a conglomerate of three German engine manufacturers, with sales of 280 million Euros. The total turnover of the deceased’s conglomerate in 2008 was 30 billion Euros. The businesses employ about 71,000 people. Herr Merckle’s holding company had been in talks with banks to secure credit after it ran up high levels of debt.

In a statement, the family commented that ‘the distress to his firms caused by the financial crisis and the related uncertainties of recent weeks, along with helplessness of being unable to act, broke [him] and he ended his life’.

‘News of Adolf Merckle’s death left me deeply shaken’, Baden-Wuerttemberg’s Prime Minister, Guenther Oettinger, said. The State had ‘lost a great entrepreneur’. In November 2008, the State Government signalled it would not assist Merckle after he sought a bailout. Herr Merckle had hired the insolvency lawyer Eberhard Braun and had threatened to initiate bankruptcy proceedings for VEM unless lenders provided him with restructuring capital, according to reports in December.

• The subtle point to be understood here is that until perhaps January, the Bush Crime/DVD nexus thought they had ‘won’, which was an illusion. They COULD NEVER ‘WIN’ without also destroying the Rockefellers through inter alia the collapse of JPMorgan Chase (a Germany-oriented bank), which means that the Clintons (as the former US President is a Rockefeller) could not, finally, allow the Bushes to get away with their game. Therefore, ALL OF A SUDDEN, and given the ‘lockdown’, the Clintons may have agreed to support the Settlements: which they cannot avoid in view of the immense and probably intolerable pressure they face.

• Steve Good, Chairman and Chief Executive of Sheldon Good & Co., a leading US real estate auction firm, was found with a gunshot to the head in his red Jaguar on Monday 5th January (the same day as Herr Merckle threw himself in front of a train near his Blaubeuren home in southern Germany). No suicide note was found with the body, suggesting this was yet another execution. Mr Good, who was Chairman of the US Realtors’ Commercial Alliance Committee, had a long-standing business relationship with Donald Trump, according to several reports dated 7th January 2009.

• Catherine Bailey, 41, a litigation partner with the law firm SJ Berwin, disappeared from her firm’s offices in Chancery lane, Central London, on Friday 9th January 2009.

Her body was found in the Thames, near Richmond Bridge, southwest London, on Sunday 11th January 2009. The lawyer’s practice included banking and regulatory disputes, involving Financial Services Authority (FSA) investigations, investment mismanagement cases and financial markets litigation. The lady was said to have been involved in a number of high-value cases and her clients included banks, funds, public and private companies and investment vehicles: in other words, she was up to her eyes in derivatives operations.

• Arthur Nadel, 76, a Hedge Fund manager in Sarasota, Florida, was reported by Bloomberg to have disappeared on 14th January. The report stated that clients were concerned that hundreds of millions of dollars may have been lost – i.e. that, with the Ponzi Scheme exposed, the manager had absconded with the money. However Nadel had telephoned his stepson and told him to go to his house, where he had left a note. Nadel ran Scoop Management Inc., which oversaw funds including Valhalla Investment Partners LP. (sic!). On 16th January, the Sarasota Herald-Tribune reported that Scoop Management Inc. may have ‘managed’ some $350 million of funds.

Sarasota police initiated an investigation on 16th January after receiving phone calls from 1:30pm in the afternoon concerning allegations about ‘hundreds of millions of dollars’ missing, according to a local police spokesman. The local newspaper described the note found by police at Nadel’s residence as ‘a suicide note’. With the drying-up of fresh sources of Ponzi funds to pay off earlier investors, the Ponzi scam had been exposed. With these fraudulent schemes, everything appears fine, perhaps for many years – the assumption being that fresh sources of finance will always be forthcoming, as investors are enticed by greed and their failure to adhere to the Prudent Man Rule [see General Glossary]. The possibility that fresh sources of finance might evaporate one day, is never considered, such is the parties’ capacity for self-deception. HOWEVER, on 27th January, Mr Nadel was arrested in Tampa, Florida, on charges of securities fraud.

• Patrick Rocca, 41, was reported by The Times, London, on 21st January 2009, to have been seen on 19th January wandering around outside his luxury Dublin home in his pyjamas. A little while later he shot himself in the head while his wife Anette was out on the school run. He died from a single gunshot at the family home in Holmeleigh, an exclusive residential enclave on the edge of Dublin’s Castleknock Gold and Country Club. The late Mr Rocca was believed to have more than e20 million in loans tied up with Anglo Irish Bank, which the Irish Government had just announced that it was nationalising. The death occurred on the day that a High Court Judge was picking through the débris of a vast pyramid scheme run by Breifne O’Brien: ANOTHER PONZI SCAM.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

SETTLEMENTS AND REFUNDING: OR DOLLAR COLLAPSES

FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF DEVELOPMENTS SINCE THE U.S. ELECTION

Monday 5 January 2009 00:01

• The US dollar requires refunding as a matter of the most extreme urgency.

The G-7-Approved Private Sector on-the-books Capital Markets Refinancing Programme, which was criminally blocked against the interests of the American people and the entire world by the self-serving thieves headed by the Bushes, Paulson, Cheney, the Clintons, Greenspan, Bernanke et al from June 2006 onwards, is the ONLY means whereby this can be achieved.

It CANNOT be done from WITHIN the US Federal Government structures, as the Government ONLY CREATES DEBT. The Private Capital Markets Refinancing Programme agreed upon by the Group of Seven financial powers CREATES REVENUE and ONGOING U.S. TREASURY TAX RECEIPTS.

Government and White House structures, being PUBLIC SECTOR, cannot do this.

The crisis that developed from June 2006 onwards is a SPECIFIC CONSEQUENCE of the corrupt decision by President George W. Bush Jr., Henry M. Paulson, Vice President Cheney, Dr Bernard Bernanke, George Bush Sr, Dr Alan Greenspan, and others, to perpetuate the depraved deficit-financing and fraudulent finance/self-enrichment carousel CREATING EVER MORE DEBT that was then hidden off-balance-sheet, rather than proceeding with the REVENUE-PRODUCING SOLUTION using fully taxed on-the-books private sector capital markets transactions that has been ON THE TABLE since 2005/2006 and which is THE ONLY WAY FORWARD FOR AMERICA AND THE WORLD.

Due to the unchecked criminal, perverse behaviour of the highest-level operatives listed above and exposed by this service, the prospect of the weight of derivative junk crashing through the ceiling into the basement and demolishing several of the largest institutions in the world, is no longer academic. If this happens, there will be a global collapse into uncontrollable chaos.

If the incoming Obama Government deviates in ANY respect from the G-7-Approved on-the-books Private Sector Capital Markets US dollar refunding formula, THE U.S. DOLLAR WILL COLLAPSE and THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC WILL NOT SURVIVE. That is the stark reality: the bottom line.

• Be warned. Our predictions, from September 2006 onwards, have been ACCURATE.

• THIS REPORT HAS BEEN UPDATED TO 8TH JANUARY, 2.00PM UK TIME…

• Mr Barack Obama has been using words like ‘oversight’, ‘transparency, and ‘full accountability’, which are NOT words that sink happily into the ears of the giga-crooks whose time is up. On 8th January, he appointed a Chief Performance Officer, Nancy Killefer, formerly of the IRS Oversight Committee and a Treasury performance evaluation expert.

• MADOFF: $1.7 BILLION IN CASH AND LIQUID ASSETS FOUND BY IRVING J. PICARD: The Trustee appointed by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) has uncovered not only the cash sum of $830 million reported below, but also a further $850 million in liquid assets, according to The Times, London, of 8th January 2009. Judge Ronald Ellis has to decide whether Mr Madoff’s activities, including the distribution by himself and his wife of valuables, called heirlooms by the Defendant’s lawyer, Ira Sorkin, when reporting to the Court on 7th January, warrant the revocation of Madoff’s bail terms. Court documents we hold, seem pretty clear on this point.

• OUT OF THE FRYING PAN AND HOVERING IN MID-AIR BEFORE FALLING INTO THE FIRE?

• THE ELITE POWER CONTINUUM’S NEW-OLD CONTROLLING TEAM

• THE PLAN: TO PURPORT TO IMPLEMENT THE G-7-APPROVED REFINANCING SCHEME WHILE IN PRACTICE CONTINUING CORRUPT ‘BUSINESS AS USUAL’: WHEN THE EDITOR SAID THIS ON THE TRANSATLANTIC PHONE, FORT MEADE PULLED THE CONNECTION, MEANING: IT’S TRUE.

• FOR THESE PEOPLE, DEBT IS AN ASSET CONTAINING CASHFLOW THAT CAN BE STOLEN

• ROCKEFELLERS, FACING DISASTER, FORCING BUSH CROOKS TO COMPLY?

• WHY THERE IS NO WAY OUT FOR THE FRAUDULENT FINANCE CADRES

• THE DEBT-ORIENTED ‘NEW ECONOMIC TEAM’ IMPOSED ON OBAMA

• LEON PANETTA FOR DCI? ARE THESE DESPERADOS MENTALLY CHALLENGED? [NEW]

• THE INITIALLY DELICATE POSITION OF BARACK OBAMA

• INCOMING PRESIDENT IS IN A STRONGER POSITION THAN PEOPLE MAY THINK

• PROMINENT RECENT ‘NEUTRALISATIONS’: SEE ‘IN MEMORIAM BELOW

• ‘FEEDER’ PONZI FINANCIER MURDERED TO COVER UP ALPHA CONNECTION?

• PRESIDENTIAL PARDONS WON’T SOLVE THEIR PROBLEM

• THE SECONDARY ‘FEEDER’ FUNDS WERE SEPARATE PONZI FRAUDS

• PERTINENT QUESTIONS FOR THE BENEFIT OF ‘THE INTERESTED’

• LONDON ‘SAFETY LOCK BOX’ RAIDS REMOVED THE COLLATERAL

• MADOFF PONZI CAROUSEL THEN BECAME A PRIMARY SOURCE OF FUNDS

• FIVE-HOUR EMERGENCY MEETING BETWEEN MRS CLINTON AND GEITHNER

• NEW YORK FED AND S.E.C INVOLVED IN THE MASTER SCANDALS

• BIG BANKS REFUSING CLIENTS ACCESS TO THEIR OWN FUNDS (= THEFT)

• OUTLINE INFORMATION ABOUT CAROUSEL TRANSACTIONS

• ‘RETAIL’ INVESTORS’ FUNDS STOLEN TO FINANCE CAROUSEL PONZI FRAUDS

• OTHER HIDEOUS DIMENSIONS OF THE POISON OF THE OCTOPUS

• ‘MAINSTREAM’ AND COURTS CONCERNED, FOR NOW AT LEAST, ONLY WITH THE MONEY ‘IN’

• FACT: NONE OF THIS MONEY HAS VANISHED. IT HAS ALL BEEN STOLEN…

• STANDARD ‘BCCI PROCEDURE’: COLLAPSE THE ‘MONEY MACHINE’, RAKE OUT THE MONEY

• POSSIBLE ISRAELI TIT-FOR-TAT FOR THE BUSH-TRIGGERED MADOFF TAKEDOWN

• STOKING UP ANTI-SEMITISM: A CYNICAL ‘ADDED BONUS’ FOR THE REVOLUTION

• DOUBLE-MINDEDNESS AND THE DOUBLE-CROSS TRADITION

• ‘MADOFF TAKEDOWN’ RELEASED TRILLIONS TO BE STOLEN WITH EASE

• GLOBALIST STRATEGISTS DESTABILISED BY SUCCESSIVE EXPLOSIONS

• UNPRECEDENTED ADMISSION BY THE IMF MANAGING DIRECTOR THAT ELITE IS TO BLAME

• BANKS HOARDING MONEY IN CASE DTC GUARANTEES ARE CALLED

• CORRUPT ‘BUSINESS AS USUAL’ PLANS IN DISARRAY

• SUCCESSIVE WAVES OF DEFAULTS OUT TO 2012-2014

• THE STRENGTHENING OF BARACK OBAMA’S POSITION

• THE FATE OF DELUDED HOLD-OUTS AGAINST THE SETTLEMENTS

• SHOUTING MATCH OVER PAYOUTS TO U.S.-BASED RECIPIENTS

• UGLY SITUATIONS FACING KEY PLAYERS

• DECISION TO APPLY THE ‘BCCI/ICELAND/ENRON TREATMENT’ TO MADOFF

• BELATED OPERATION TO DISCREDIT PRESIDENT SARKOZY

• WHAT PRESIDENT BUSH JR. WAS REALLY UP TO IN BAGHDAD: TRYING TO STEAL MONEY

• NO DENIAL OF THE MORGAN STANLEY TERRORISM FINANCING CENTER

• AL-QAEDA WILL HAVE TO BE CLOSED DOWN: BY BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA

• FOLLOWING OUR MULTIPLE EXPOSURES, DVD NOW SAID TO BE ‘BITTERLY DIVIDED’

• DVD’S BRUSSELS BLACKMAIL UNIT AIMED AT EUROPEAN COMMISSIONERS: DG1-X

• THE MADOFF HYDROGEN BOMB EXPLODES

• MADOFF RECRUITED BY, AND ‘WORKED FOR’, BUSH/CIA PONZI CRIME APPARAT

• ‘MADOFF TAKEDOWN’: A VAST SMOKESCREEN ‘PROTECTING’ THE GIGA-CROOKS

• MADOFF ‘CHANGES THE SUBJECT’, WHILE LAW ENFORCEMENT SITS ON ITS HANDS

• THE PRIMARY ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS FROM THE MADOFF COURT FILES

• MADOFF BANK ACCOUNTS WITH JP MORGAN CHASE AND BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON

• MORE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON BANK ACCOUNTS COME TO LIGHT

• EXPERT ADVANCE WARNINGS ‘DISREGARDED BY THE S.E.C.’

• HEAVILY PROMOTED STAR WITNESS FAILS TO APPEAR: WAS HE THREATENED?

• PARALLEL INTERVENTION OF THE SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION

• IF YOU THINK YOU’RE A VICTIM, THE FBI WOULD LIKE TO HEAR FROM YOU

• INTERIM LIST OF ‘MONEY IN’ LOSERS ARISING FROM THE COLLAPSING
OF THE MADOFF COMPONENT OF THE GLOBAL PONZI MONEY MACHINE

• FORMER PRESIDENT CLINTON FORCED TO REVEAL HIS ‘DONORS’

• PARTIAL LIST OF CLINTON FOUNDATION ‘DONORS’

• CONCLUSION: U.S. DOLLAR REFUNDING MUST PROCEED AS DEMANDED BY THE G-7

• THE ORIGINAL PONZI SCHEME EXPLAINED: AGAIN, IN CASE YOU MISSED IT EARLIER

• LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS HAVE FLOUTED

• THE COPYRIGHT OF THIS ARTICLE IS OWNED BY WORLD REPORTS LIMITED: ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED. ELECTRONIC REPRODUCTION OF PART OR ALL OF THIS TEXT PROHIBITED.

• WE HAVE RECENTLY ISSUED AN INVOICE FOR $27.3 MILLION AGAINST AN INFRINGER OF OUR COPYRIGHT WORKS IN CALIFORNIA, WITH FULL DETAILS FURNISHED TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WHICH IS HYPERSENSITIVE ABOUT COPYRIGHT BREACHES.

• THE USUAL CROP OF FABRICATIONS ABOUT THE EDITOR OF THIS SERVICE HAS STARTED UP, WITH ONE GROSS LIBEL ASSERTING THAT THE EDITOR ‘WORKS FOR’ A CERTAIN POWER. SUCH LIES ARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO (1) IGNORANCE AND (2) MALICE. THIS OPERATION IS 100% INDEPENDENT, ALWAYS HAS BEEN, ALWAYS WILL BE, AND FUNCTIONS ARMS’-LENGTH FROM ALL OUTSIDE INTERESTS. SEE THE STATEMENT IN PLAIN ENGLISH AT THE FOOT OF REPORT.

• ANONYMOUS SOURCES OF ‘INFORMATION’ AND ‘DEBATE’: By definition, all anonymous US sources of so-called ‘information’ are spooks and other cowards who are too scared to reveal their identities, for fear not least of being held accountable for their convoluted fabrications. Therefore, anyone who attaches significance or relevance to ANYTHING that any of these anonymous, self-contradictory sources purport to be revealing, does so at his or her own peril. One can of course freely choose to be misled by the various US controlled disinformation, diversion and obfuscation sources, if one wishes to avert one’s gaze from the obvious: namely that the kleptocracy is running these Psy-Ops diversionary operations in order to provide themselves with cover for their odious crimes, and to keep the Ponzi victims hoping, like Rip van Winkel, that they haven’t been ripped off. And since the anonymous spooks and cowards hide behind anonymity, any denial of this apparent truth from them will, like all pronouncements aimed at misleading the ‘scammed’, lack credibility.

Obviously, some of these anonymous sources who cannot be held accountable for any of their lies and fabrications, may take objection to what we may publish. However that is their problem: since they do not reveal their identities, no communication with these operatives is ever possible or at any stage desirable, because in any ‘debate’, a level playing field is necessary: a ‘debate’ between a real person and anonymous spooks and cowards would not take place on a level playing field.

The cover of these anonymous spookies has been well and truly blown. When this happens, the knee-jerk response is to resort to defamation. However defamation of a real person by anonymous spooks lacks all credibility too, and simply reveals the pinpoint accuracy of the assessment.

In any case, as has been stated at the foot of most of our reports for years, we cannot enter into correspondence as a consequence of these reports. Many of those who may attempt to enter into correspondence with us are not subscribing to our published services and have no intention of doing so. This service was originally developed to be of assistance to our subscribers, and that is its main purpose. The Editor’s job is to manage and produce the publications listed on our catalog, accessible via this website. The production of these reports is a secondary exercise. Therefore, if you don’t subscribe, we are not available to be of further assistance. The Editor does, however, try to respond to kind and helpful emails expressing positive support, provided that all coordinates are clearly shown in the Contact Us fields so provided. Again, the Editor has been quite amazed at the kindness shown in response to our Christmas posting dated 26th December 2008.

That experience confirms the Editor’s personal experience that Americans are often the kindest and most generous people in the world. Their problem is that their Government is run by organised geomasonic crime. Amid great fury, a tectonic change is in progress which few yet understand.

For a comprehensive debunking and takedown of the geomasonic New World Order, please place an order for the Editor’s book The New Underworld Order, available from this combined website.

• NEW: CALENDAR OF OFFICIAL REGULATORY AND ENFORCEMENT FAILURES: SEE BELOW

• NEW: IN MEMORIAM: LIST OF RELATED/REPORTED SUDDEN DEATHS (‘SUICIDINGS’)

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

Just as material posted on the Internet by ANONYMOUS sources lacks credibility, so that therefore its content should prudently be dismissed as irrelevant, so are emails addressed for our attention from ANONYMOUS senders considered impertinent and unworthy of attention. Secondly, offensive emails ventilating some gripe or other, are normally deleted unread by our system. On a pleasing note, we received a VERY LARGE positive ‘e-mailbag’ following the 26th December 2008 Christmas report, which the Editor found very touching, kind, unexpected and generous*. Thank you! Contrary to expectations, opposition was extremely feeble, confined even to lecturing the Editor on which Bible he should be reading! When you stand up to them, THEY FALL BACK TO THE GROUND.

* Interestingly, all these generous emails (and phone calls) emanated from the United States and Canada. There was NOT ONE SINGLE SUCH RESPONSE from the United Kingdom. NOT ONE.

Advertisement:
NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system that assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program that devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. Some versions have a ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

• INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW, Volume 33, #s 3 & 4, all 972 pages of it, is making waves all over the world. It contains a blow-by-blow deconstruction of this crisis via the Wantagate plus our further analyses: and everything published therein is now well and truly ON THE GLOBAL PUBLIC RECORD. Accordingly the whole world owns a detailed, damning account of the serial criminality of the Bush-Cheney-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ et al., which CANNOT BE EXPUNGED.

• INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW, Volume 34, Number 1, consisting of some 400 pages, WAS DISTRIBUTED BY FAST MAIL TO SUBSCRIBERS WORLDWIDE ON 29TH NOVEMBER 2008…

• It tracks the fallout from our exposures of the criminality from mid-April 2008 to 6th October 2008, when this issue of ICR had to go to press. The Glossary that is published with The Cottrell Plan has been separated out and placed at the end of the issue, for long-term ease-of-reference purposes.

• If you wish to obtain a copy and you are not a regular subscriber, please order International Currency Review via our electronic payment system by pressing SUBSCRIBE. This will give a full-price order sequence. Then press CONTACT US and state that you wish to order ICR 34, #1. The single-issue price has to be at a premium to the regular price, charged at $200.00 per copy. Note:
Please ensure that you send a CONTACT US email to the Publisher at the same time as you press SUBSCRIBE, so that we KNOW to send you ONLY ICR 34, #1 and to charge you ONLY $200.

• The CONTACT US facility is found in the red box throughout this combined website.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• Please Make a Donation to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing global financial corruption investigations, which have turned the whole world upside down and have exposed the corruption which was intended to enable the geocriminalist syndicate to seize the wealth of the entire world. These people have finally been more or less completely stopped in their tracks as a consequence of these exposures. Your assistance will be sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. The Editor’s $35,000 Wanta bail-out money was not repaid and so has been stolen. It will be collected in due course and the thief will be appropriately dealt with, having so far taken no steps at all to repay the Editor’s loan funds, which should have been remitted on 11th June 2007.

• See the second white panel for details of our latest distributed intelligence publications.

• MICHAEL C. COTTRELL’S PROPOSALS FOR THE REFORM OF THE U.S FINANCIAL SYSTEM, AND HIS DEBUNKING OF THE IMPRACTICABLE AND EXPENSIVE ‘PAULSON’ PROPOSALS, PLUS OUR EXTENSIVE GLOSSARY, POSTED ON 22ND JULY AND REPOSTED ON 12TH SEPTEMBER, WERE AGAIN ‘SNIPPED’ BY THE NSA’S MENTAL DEFECTIVES. THE REPORT WAS REPOSTED ON 18TH SEPTEMBER 2008. THE REPORT HAS BEEN EXTREMELY WELL RECEIVED WORLDWIDE.

• PRINT EDITIONS OF THE COTTRELL PLAN: Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 11, #s 9 & 10, published in July-August, was devoted almost entirely to The Cottrell Plan and to the extensive Glossary of financial market and related definitions, which explains where so many people have gone wrong. International Currency Review, Volume 34, #1, also contains The Cottrell Plan and the Glossary, placed at the end of this 400-page issue for long-term easy reference.

• Subscriptions by serious observers and analysts to our services may be placed via this website.

• NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

OUT OF THE FRYING PAN AND HOVERING IN MID-AIR BEFORE FALLING INTO THE FIRE?
In reports posted since the US general Election, we have noted that while, given the imminent end at long last of the evil George Bush II Administration, it can be said that we have jumped out of the frying pan, it has hitherto been too early to conclude that we have yet fallen headlong into the fire. Our stance therefore has so far postulated that we were hanging in-mid-air, pending the arrival of further data, which would make the answer to this riddle more apparent.

Closer now to the installation of the new American régime, we have the following evidence, already publicised here, to suggest that President-elect Obama has not been a pushover for the Forces of Darkness that have apparently hijacked his incoming Administration.

We’ll repeat this evidence first:

• When Mr Obama visited the White House for the first time following the election with his wife, the Bush team tried to bribe him. He rejected this typically brazen, arrogant and crude Bushite attempt to compromise him, according to our special sources. The fact that Obama told the President where to get off is a known PLUS for the incoming President of the United States.

• We also know that when he was briefed by the FBI in Chicago immediately following the election, Mr Obama ‘blew up’ when it was made apparent to him that, under a long-planned CIA contingency arrangement in case he won the election (i.e., if the CIA Forces of Clintonesque Darkness could not rig the outcome to their satisfaction), the framework for his Administration had been decided for him by the mainly Jewish operatives who stand to lose most if corrupt ‘business as usual’ were to be thwarted with the installation of the new régime. Previously we reported that Mr Obama’s first briefing was from the CIA, but since the FBI is subordinate to the organised criminal ‘State within the State’ known as the CIA, that is a nuance that makes little difference. In subsequent days, he also received detailed briefings direct from the CIA.

• It is further known that President-elect Obama lost no opportunity to make it very clear that the Settlements process must be completed (the country recipients WERE paid, effective Friday 19th December 2008, in cash, the Treasury having guaranteed the payments from 18th December). Our information is that he has demanded settlement on several occasions. It is clear that resistance to his demands by the organised criminalists has been only partially successful to date.

• As further reported by this service, when impediments to settlement orchestrated by Gordon Brown became known, President-elect Barack Obama sent an emissary to speak directly with the corrupted British Prime Minister, who is an intelligence officer like his corrupt predecessor, to demand that he cease and desist, on pain of being arrested.

In June 2008, we reported that Gordon Brown’s treachery and dishonesty was exposed when he secretly flew to Belfast, having already said goodbye to President Bush II and his wife in front of the TV cameras on the steps of Number 10 Downing Street. In Belfast, he rejoined President Bush Jr. and his wife, and engaged in certain banking transactions in collaboration with Bush II himself. This was exposed after we posted the following paragraph in our report dated 18th June 2008, which was followed up and found to be accurate:

WHY DID BROWN FLY TO NORTHERN IRELAND HAVING EARLIER
SAID GOODBYE TO THE BUSHES ON THE STEPS OF DOWNING STREET?
We will now pose the following question. WHY was it ‘necessary’ for Brown, who had seen George Bush in the morning of Monday 16th June, to rush up to Northern Ireland so as to be in a position to be standing on the tarmac at Belfast airport, to ‘greet’ the President and Laura when they arrived in Northern Ireland? After all, he had just said goodbye to President Bush. Perish the thought that the purpose of his presence there might have been to open bank accounts. Perish the thought.

• President-elect Obama is known to have been ‘working with’ President Nicolas Sarkozy, who obtained the ‘mandate to pay’ from President George W. Bush at Camp David in October 2008 as previously reported by this service, to procure the Settlements without further ado.

• The ‘Daley people’ and other ‘forces’ out of Chicago want to be paid, too, you understand (do you?) and have, as predicted ages ago, taken the law into their own hands, which is why gunshots are heard in trading rooms, bankers and intermediaries are found sitting at their desks after having suffered heart attacks or with their wrists slashed, and numerous other unspecific ‘neutralisations’ are and have been taking place with increasing ‘Black’ intensity as the hijacking of the whole world by the most ruthless gang of intelligence criminals mysteriously still walking today stretches way beyond the globally critical stage.

THE ELITE POWER CONTINUUM’S NEW-OLD CONTROLLING TEAM
Within this overall context, however, it is a reality that the illicit trading team which is to operate seamlessly from the Obama White House – a team that the ‘Black’ operations intelligence criminals working for and with several domestic and foreign intelligence-linked counterparties put together ahead of Obama’s election victory and foisted on him the moment the election outcome had been confirmed – consists of finance operatives linked to past gross financial abominations, under the preceding two US Administrations.

• This ‘retread’ team intends to continue the illicit trading activity under President Obama’s nose from the White House throughout the new President’s term or terms office, but is facing severe impediments behind the scenes which cannot be reported on at this time.

The primary members of this latest manifestation of the Elite Power Continuum are Rahm Emanuel (a Kissinger operative, member of the Israel Defense Force, i.e. one would suspect him to be an Israeli Military Intelligence Officer), Hillary Rodomski Clinton, Joseph Biden, Tom Daschle (Citibank stooge, mentored by Robert Rubin), Bill Richardson* (ex-Kissinger Associates), Eric Holder (he who arranged the pardoning of Marc Rich, a.k.a. the very long-range DVD operative Hans Brand), General James L Jones (yet another Kissinger associate), Lawrence Summers (mentored by Robert Rubin, guardian of Clinton’s (frozen) accounts), Timothy Geithner (ex-Kissinger Associates), Paul Volcker (Rockefeller family representative yet Chairman of a Rothschild Wolfensohn firm), David Axelrod (a political consultant whose past clients include Senators H. Clinton, John Edwards and Christopher Dodd, Stalin’s grandson), and Susan Rice, ex-Clinton’s National Security Council.

* On 4th January 2009, Bill Richardson, Governor of New Mexico, withdrew his name from the list of candidates for confirmation, citing ‘a pending investigation into a company that has done business with his State’ (code for an imminently breaking corruption scandal). We speculate that Hillary was behind this rapid ‘exit’. What does Mr Richardson know, for instance, about Rocky Flats and the espionage of the Chinese operative Wen Ho Li at Los Alamos, we wonder? Just asking…

The notorious names among these operatives should be arrested forthwith and extradited to the United Kingdom to face charges of financing international terrorism, of economic terrorism, and of stealing from The Queen, and enriching themselves as a consequence inter alia of profiting from the theft of her gold on 29th-30th March 2007, which was exclusively reported, in the first instance, by this service. Protests from various quarters that ‘there is no-one willing to arrest these people’, ignore the fact that by publicising such information, the pressure on these soulless operatives is ratcheted up all the time. After all, the daily lives of all the familiar highest-level criminalists have been rendered intolerable and miserable as a consequence of what has had to be posted to date – entirely as a consequence of the perverse decisions that these people have made so as to be able to continue their terrorism financing operations. That has been their choice: they made their own filthy bed, and they must lie in it.

• Almost everyone in this cauldron has been compromised to some degree or another.

• THE PLAN: TO PURPORT TO IMPLEMENT THE G-7-APPROVED REFINANCING SCHEME WHILE IN PRACTICE CONTINUING CORRUPT ‘BUSINESS AS USUAL’: WHEN THE EDITOR SAID THIS ON THE TRANSATLANTIC PHONE, FORT MEADE PULLED THE CONNECTION, MEANING: IT’S TRUE.

Notwithstanding everything that has happened since Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill was fired by President Bush Jr., after O’Neill had asked him to release the diverted funds, and since we started to publicise the hijacking of the $4.5 trillion, and our subsequent detailed website exposures of the historically unprecedented corruption, the Intelligence Power has put in place an Economic Team, listed below, FOR THE SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE OF CONTINUING WITH THE FRAUDULENT OFF-BALANCE SHEET FINANCING OPERATIONS SEAMLESSLY THROUGHOUT THE OBAMA YEARS, from within the White House as though there has been no discontinuity and no opposition to this corruption had ever surfaced, and the Rest of the World knew nothing about it.

FOR THESE PEOPLE, DEBT IS AN ASSET CONTAINING CASHFLOW THAT CAN BE STOLEN
Beyond the standard criminal finance purpose, the mentality behind this intention (which is being thwarted) assumes that salvation is to be found through the issuance of yet more debt. For these people, who have overstayed their welcome, debt is ‘an asset’ in a sense not usually understood: for the practical factor here is that DEBT PRESUPPOSES A CASHFLOW WHICH CAN BE STOLEN.

Cashflow exists within debt ‘assets’: so these criminal finance operatives are predisposed towards the United States accumulating ever more debt, out to infinity – choosing to overlook the reality that another year or less of this behaviour will destroy the US dollar completely.

• For the dollar to be destroyed, all that is necessary is for one or two big financial powers to refuse to pay or charge for their oil in dollars: and such a development is IMMINENT. The parallel collapse of one or more huge US institutions would destroy the entire world financial economy.

The US dollar external Ponzi operation that ‘worked’ for a century, notoriously depended upon the willingness of foreigners to hold dollars. It is crystal clear to this financial sector observer who has nearly four decades’ experience that if the new US Obama Treasury does not proceed with the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme exactly as conceived, WITHOUT AMENDMENT – namely, that it is to be a PRIVATE SECTOR CAPITAL MARKETS OPERATION, not a Government operation that is susceptible to ‘insider’ corruption run surreptitiously out of the White House and the Treasury, key financial powers will DROP THE U.S. DOLLAR. The argument that ‘there is no alternative’ cannot be relied upon in the situation that will be unfolding in the first quarter of this year.

As the Rest of the World will KNOW at some stage soon (during the first quarter of 2009) whether the new Treasury is to implement the G-7-Approved Refinancing Plan WITHOUT AMENDMENT, any FAILURE OR FURTHER FOOT-DRAGGING on the part of the new Obama Treasury to adhere to the Private Sector Capital Markets Refinancing and US Dollar Refunding Programme as was specifically approved by the Group of Seven (G-7) powers and re-approved at the G-7 Conference in northern Germany in June 2007 when The Queen called for its implementation ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’, could lead to the unhesitating abandonment of the US dollar as the currency in which payment is demanded and made for exported oil, irrespective of all other considerations.

BECAUSE:

• Foreigners will take fright at the prospect of another eight years of a pariah US Government intent upon ADDING TO the overhang of obligations that is threatening to fall through the roof, through all the building’s floors and into the basement, with catastrophic consequences.

The new Obama Economic Team, whether foisted upon the incoming President or not, is DEBT-oriented: which is a recipe for catastrophic and terminal failure. The G-7-Approved Private Sector Refinancing Programme, which GENERATES ON-THE-BOOKS ACCRUALS THAT ARE TAXED AT 35% yielding massive ongoing real money accruals to the US Treasury, CREATES NEW REVENUE AND THEREFORE POSITIVE, TRANSPARENT AND TANGIBLE CASHFLOW that is available both for paying down debt and for urgent infrastructure rebuilding and massive domestic projects: funds that, because of on-the-books transparency, cannot be diverted, stolen, exploited or ransacked by ruthless, wayward finance operatives holding high office within the US official structures.

• It is the ONLY way forward, and everyone, from Barack Obama downwards, and at the highest levels of the leading financial powers, knows it.

ROCKEFELLERS, FACING DISASTER, FORCING BUSH CROOKS TO COMPLY?
As will be seen when we come to the deliberate imploding (by the Bush apparat) of the Madoff Ponzi Scheme Carousel, the two institutions employed by Madoff and his broker-dealership are JPMorgan Chase and The Bank of New York Mellon – the two US exotic financial enterprises which have accumulated colossal inverted overhanging pyramids of derivatives junk liabilities: indeed, JPMorgan Chase, which harbours the Terrorism Financing Center that we have exposed on this website, is where this immense assembly of fraudulent finance Ponzi Scheme scams began.

• IS’NT THAT INTERESTING?

Now, we are advised by ‘deep’ sources that the Rockefellers have ‘got the upper hand’ against the Bush Crime Family apparat. But this is ‘back to front’ in the following respect:

The practical reality is that the Rockefeller interests are in extreme danger of being crushed and reduced to pulp should the accumulated weight of the derivatives liabilities that is sitting on the roof crash through successive floors into the basement: and this will happen, as the Rockefellers know very well, if the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme creating real, on-the-books taxable revenues that cannot be hijacked, diverted or stolen by criminal operatives inside the American structures, is sidestepped, as the New Economic Team was (INCREDIBLY) set up to procure.

Hence, the Rockefeller interests (believed to be backed here by the Rothschilds as well) have been left with no option but to insist that the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme is finally kick-started in the private sector, and NOT via the White House and the Treasury, as the debt-oriented high-level fraudulent finance engineers had intended.

WHY THERE IS NO WAY OUT FOR THE FRAUDULENT FINANCE CADRES
More broadly, the US fraudulent finance sector is now facing the reality of collapse because by spreading the risk so widely, they have in fact generated an environment of open warfare both within the affected financial institutions, between the participants, between financial institutions, between investors and implicated US legal firms, in fact prospectively between every benighted participant in this US-instigated global panorama of financial fraud.

• Why did they spread the risk so broadly?

• Answer: Because it was assumed that if anyone tried to STOP the carousel (as has occurred), the outcome would be a financial nuclear explosion.

On this false premise, they therefore assumed, like professional Ponzi artists and losing gamblers in a casino, that their fraudulent finance carousel could continue sine die and that their formula for manufacturing false wealth out of nothing could never be challenged or brought down.

How wrong these ‘Useful Idiots’ were. HOW STUPID AND ARROGANT, TOO.

Because what they now face is financial annihilation and obliteration whichever way the crisis goes:

• ANNIHILATION when, against the background of the G-7-Approved Private Sector Capital Markets Refinancing Programme, derivatives outstanding are priced, say, at 1 cent on the dollar:

or:

• OBLITERATION if the entire inverted pyramid of derivatives liabilities collapses, destroying the likes of JPMorgan Chase and The Bank of New York Mellon in the process – and of course the Rockefellers AND THE BUSH-CLINTON FINANCIAL CRIME apparatus with them.

In other words, THERE IS NO WAY OUT FOR THE FINANCIAL CRIMINAL CADRES. They are caught and cannot get out with the money they thought they had made.

• But there IS a way out for the Rest of Us – via the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme.

THE DEBT-ORIENTED ‘NEW ECONOMIC TEAM’ IMPOSED ON OBAMA
Meanwhile the emergence of the new ‘retread’ Economic Team, for the purpose of continuing debt financing and fraudulent finance as usual, explains why the outgoing US Treasury Secretary, that devil Mr Paulson, was walking around with a self-satisfied smirk on his face. He knew that when he leaves office, it will be illicit, corrupt ‘business as usual’ – run out of the White House, with him, of course, as a corrupt participant. OR SO HE IMAGINED.

The team members, specifically assembled to continue the illicit financial trading operations out of the White House, Treasury and State Department under Mr Obama’s nose, are as follows (1):

• Timothy Geithner, US Treasury Secretary: President and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, former Director of Policy Development for the International Monetary Fund, Member of the Group of Thirty (G-30), formerly employed at Kissinger Associates, mentored by Lawrence Summers and by Robert Rubin, and a Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission member/participant. [Trilateral Commission is another long-range German front].

• Paul Volcker, to be head of a new Economic Recovery Advisory Board: Former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board under Presidents Carter and Reagan, the former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Chairman of a Rothschild Wolfensohn Company, Member of the Group of Thirty (G-30), longtime Rockefeller Family associate, and a Bilderberg and Council on Foreign Relations member, and North American Chairman of the Trilateral Commission. Volcker, as was previously reported, is also a Trustee, which may be assumed to be liable to influence his thinking.

• Rahm Emanuel, White House Chief of Staff: This man is a member of the Israel Defence Force (IDF), i.e. of a foreign military establishment, from which we deduce that he is the Israeli equivalent of a Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) officer. Why don’t they just install the head of the ongoing Soviet GRU as White House Chief of Staff, and be done with it? A hardline Zionist and a Kissinger protégé, former Congressman and a member of the Board of Directors of Freddie Mac, he also spent two years as an investment banker for Wasserstein Perella [see this report]. He was a key member of Clinton’s finance campaign committee and was implicated in the cover-up of the murder of Vincent Foster. His father was a member of the Israeli Irgun terrorist group, which blew up the King David Hotel inflicting a large number of British military deaths in the process.

• Lawrence Summers, to head the National Economic Council: Summers was US Treasury Secretary during the Clinton Administration, former World Bank Chief Economist, former President of Harvard University (where rising operatives are sent for indoctrination), Board Member of the Brookings Institute, protégé of David Rockefeller, mentored by Robert Rubin, and also a Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission member/participant..

• David Axelrod, Senior Adviser: A political consultant whose past clients include Senators Hillary Clinton, John Edwards and Representative Christopher Dodd (Stalin’s grandson).

• Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State: Originally a clandestine CIA asset who was used to infiltrate the Yale University anti-war movement, Watergate hearings participant, CIA operative, senior partner in the Little Rock, Arkansas Rose Law Firm, key figure in the Mena drug trafficking scandal, alleged architect of the Waco disaster, implicated in many deaths including the cover-up of the murder of Vincent Foster: world-class criminal operative and a Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission member/participant. Likely to order liquidation of the Editor of this service.

• Joseph Biden, Vice President: Senator since 1972, Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Chairman of the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, staunch Zionist sympathiser who told Rabbi Mark S. Golub of Shalom TV: ‘I am a Zionist. You don’t have to be a Jew to be a Zionist’, and a Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission member/participant.

• Bill Richardson: Former US Congressman, Chairman of the Democratic National Convention in 2004, former employee of Kissinger Associates, US Ambassador to the United Nations, Governor of New Mexico, Energy Secretary, key operative involved in the Monica Lewinsky Israeli intelligence honey-trap spying cover-up with Bilderberg luminary Vernon Jordan, and a Bilderberg and Council on Foreign Relations member/participant. THIS CANDIDATE HAS WITHDRAWN: SEE ABOVE.

• Robert Gates, Defense Secretary: The former Director of Central Intelligence (CIA), and Defense Secretary under President George W. Bush, knee-deep in the Iran-Contra scandal and its financial ramifications, named in a 1999 class action lawsuit pertaining to the criminal Mena drug trafficking operation, Co-Chairman of a Council on Foreign Relations Task Force with Zbigniew Brzezinski, and a Bilderberg and Council on Foreign Relations participant.

• Tom Daschle, Health Secretary: Former Senate Majority leader, Clinton lackey, mentored by Robert Rubin and a Bilderberg and Council on Foreign Relations member/participant.

• Eric Holder, Attorney General: heavily involved in procuring the Presidential Pardon for Marc Rich (the long-range Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD) operative Hans Brand), Deputy Attorney General under Janet Reno, and facilitated the pardoning of 16 Puerto Rican FALN terrorists.

• Janet Napolitano, Director of the Department of Homeland Security: Governor of Arizona, US Attorney during the Clinton Administration, instrumental in the Oklahoma City Bombing cover-up (which inter alia covered up the destruction of the German Nazi files kept in the Murrah Building) after she had declared ‘We’ll pursue every bit of evidence and every lead’, soft on immigration, described as ‘another Janet Reno’, and a Council on Foreign Relations Member.

• General James L. Jones, National Security Advisor: Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander, Special Envoy for Middle East Security, on the Board of Directors of Chevron and Boeing, NATO Commander, Member of Brent Scowcroft’s Institute for International Affairs along with Zbigbiew Brzezinski, Bobby Ray Inman, Dr Henry Kissinger, and the former DCI (CIA), John Deutch.

• Susan Rice, US Ambassador to the United Nations: Rhodes Scholar, campaign foreign policy advisor to John Kerry and Michael Dukakis when Presidential candidates, member of President Clinton’s National security Council, Assistant Secretary of State for Africa, alumnus of the Brookings Institution (funded by the Rockefellers and the Ford Foundation), member of the Aspen Strategy Group teeming with insiders such as the odious drug operative Richard Armitage, Brent Scowcroft and Madeleine Albright, and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

On a much more satisfactory tack, Mr Obama has selected:

• Mary Schapiro, to be Head of the severely discredited US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): Ms Schapiro has been Chief Executive of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and was Head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) during the Clinton era, where she ran a very tight ship. This is an inspired choice, as this lady’s reputation stands high; and as The Times, London, stated correctly on 19th December, she has a ‘deep understanding of both financial futures and the commodities markets’.

Given the imperative for the Wall Street Rule Book to be rewritten, as Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. has argued, this appointment is significant, indicating that Mr Obama is ‘not to be messed with’.

• Peter Orszag, to be Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB): Ordinarily, this appointee’s brief is to continue the falsification of the US Federal Budget numbers out to infinity. However Mr Orszag has been Director of the Congressional Budget Office, which enjoys a sound reputation, whereas the OMB has for decades been engaged in creative accounting, smoke and mirrors obfuscation, and the falsification of the US Federal Budget and background debt data. On the face of it, therefore, the appointment of Mr Orszag is an inspired ‘pick’ which, we understand, was entirely Mr Obama’s own: and a clever move this is, too: because if, finally, an honest Director is installed at the OMB, it suddenly becomes much harder for the numbers to be fiddled.

Very significantly, when presenting Mr Orszag to the press and the public on 25th November, Mr Obama predicted a ‘page-by-page, line-by-line budget review to root out unnecessary spending’. And, with his Electoral College landslide victory amply confirmed, Mr Obama proclaimed that he possesses ‘a mandate to move the country in a NEW DIRECTION, and NOT TO CONTINUE the same old practices that have gotten us into the fix we’re in…. As soon as the recovery is well under way, we need to set up a long-term plan to reduce the structural deficit and to make sure that we are not leaving a mountain of debt for the next generation’.

• This sounds pretty much like an Obama endorsement of the G-7-Approved Private Sector Capital Markets Refinancing Programme, which is, and HAS ALWAYS BEEN, the ONLY solution on the table, because only the private sector creates revenue: the Government ONLY CREATES DEBT.

• Separately John Podesta, head of the Obama Transition Team, and former White House Chief of Staff, was implicated in the Vincent Foster murder along with Emanuel and Mrs Hillary Clinton. At the time of this analysis, there was no indication that Podesta would see ‘life after Inauguration’.

• Leon Panetta, former Chief of Staff to criminalist President Clinton, was reported on 5th January to have been selected as Director of Central Intelligence (CIA). THIS IS VERY BAD NEWS. Panetta was involved in all the relevant ‘bad stuff’ under Clinton, and his ‘selection’ (imposition?) suggests a rearguard action by the recalcitrant criminalists to CONTINUE ‘running the money’ through the CIA if, as expected, the intention to continue doing so seamlessly through the White House, the State Department and the Treasury, is closed off (due to factors we can’t go into). If this suspicion is in any way close to the mark, it needs to be understood that THIS WON’T FLY EITHER. The situation is precisely as stated in the opening paragraphs of this report, above the bullet points.

Panetta is very familiar with the secret Halliburton scamming operations buried inside the CIA and the Pentagon which we helped to expose in the summer. He is very fully aware of the faulty Saudi Arabian artillery weapon which killed US troops undergoing training, and he knows all about those toasters costing less than $20 at hardware stores which Halliburton sold for nearly $1,900 a piece. He is Cheney’s evil twin. A HILLARY CLINTON PICK AND IT STINKS.

The US criminalists THINK THEY CAN CONTINUE WITH THEIR FRAUDULENT FINANCE. But time and global patience has run out. Should they remain under this mischievous illusion for long after the Inauguration, they will be BURIED, along with Morgan Stanley, The Bank of New York Mellon, Deutsche Bank and the other corrupt institutons. Such an outcome may be imminent.

• These fools MUST BE STOPPED. THEY ARE OPERATING ACCORDING TO OLD, REDUNDANT CRITERIA. Their model is a train wreck. They cannot continue this fraudulent finance. They think they CAN continue this fraudulent finance off-balance sheet. It is the job of Gold Badges et al to make them understand that the model has not only passed its sell-by date: it’s a grenade that will ignite a financial and economic holocaust with no parallel, affecting the whole of humanity. Clinton is a deeply evil influence inside the Obama camp and is evidently calling the shots. However, this madness CANNOT OVERCOME THE ELEPHANT IDENTIFIED AT THE TOP OF THIS REPORT, and neither can it overcome key factors that cannot be discussed right now. These developments all reflect warfare behind the scenes and cannot be taken as ‘set in concrete’ quite yet.

• There are more shoes to fall (i.e. airborne shoes to be thrown).

• WE UNDERSTAND, HOWEVER, THAT, ALL OF A SUDDEN, THE PENNY HAS DROPPED… Namely, that a calamity will follow any imminent failure to complete the Settlements and the Refunding of the US Dollar by means of the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme using transparent Capital Markets Operations on-the-books, yielding REVENUE, rather than continuing with such transactions off the books, yielding DEBT which is what Government participation in the Refinancing Programme can only generate. The prospect of a catastrophic series of events is of extreme global concern….

THE INITIALLY DELICATE POSITION OF BARACK OBAMA
Because this pre-assembled, debt-focused incoming Obama Economic Team was put in place and apparently foisted on President-Elect Obama (whether with his consent or not is unknown), anger among the CIA-backed Internet Blogocracy was switched after the US Election away from outgoing President George W. Bush to Mr Barack Obama, who was even being referred to in late December as ‘more evil than Bush’ – an amazing transformation, given the fact that Obama had not yet shown his mettle except as analysed above (none of the febrile ‘rumours’ about what he is supposed to have agreed to, had any substance as they were typically proffered by unaccountable ANONYMOUS sources and even if that were not the case, could never be verified): nor can ANY President-Elect promulgate Executive Orders, as has been suggested elsewhere, in a quite astonishing display of ignorance! But then, the sources for this nonsense are ANONYMOUS and thus unaccountable.

The likelihood is that Obama was suddenly the focus of vituperative CIA-fanned attacks precisely because, as indicated here, the Elite Power Continuum served by the Intelligence Power, which controls the US Government, intended to pretend that there has been no discontinuity – and to continue centrally-directed, surreptitious corrupt financial operations out of the new White House under Mr Obama’s nose, as though nothing had happened. Given CIA compartmentalisation, the Blogocracy cannot be expected to be aware that this scheme has already been torpedoed.

It also stands to reason that attempts may be made to blackmail the incoming President.

• However we have two points to stress in this connection:

(1) EVERY SINGLE MEMBER of this crew on the stage and off the stage, even operatives below the radar, is being prospectively blackmailed at all times. There is a ‘Black’ file on 100% of those who are chosen to walk onto the stage. So the fact that Mr Obama is almost certainly being blackmailed by the evil Intelligence Power is essentially a NEUTRAL issue. He has displayed evidence that he can be very tough, and his wife, who should know, has specifically stated that he is and will be ‘a hard task-master’. Therefore, in our opinion this man shows the character and ability to rise above this unavoidable hazard. The way to deal with the threat of any blackmail (which can of course be predicated on lies), even when baseless, is to recall that the blackmailer is invariably in a weaker position than the blackmailee, not least because if he uses his ‘weapon’, he then exhausts all his ammunition and thereafter becomes powerless. Therefore, the best course for Mr Obama, should he have concluded that he may unjustly be a blackmail target, would appear to be to steel himself to ignore any such pressure, and to bear in mind the following foreign example: which is not to be construed as having any implications whatsoever, but solely to make the point that the blackmailer is WEAKER than his target (especially, as in Mr Obama’s case, when the prospective blackmail may be based upon the odious transgressions of lies and false witness):

(2) Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin has been called a ‘vampire’ by his wife, no less. This probably refers to Vladimir Putin’s involvement in certain satanic activities, which would be fully consistent with his background as a Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) operative, as well as his KGB background. (GRU officers are also KGB officers: KGB officers are not necessarily GRU officers).

Mr Putin was further deliberately photographed within the past year kissing the bared tummy of a small child. What was that all about? Here is the answer: Putin, like José Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission, and certain others we could name, is a paedophile, a fact which has clearly been held in reserve by those forces inside the structures who believe they can or could blackmail him. By staging this ‘kissing operation’, Mr Putin ‘blew’ their chances. While the revolting image revealed the truth about Putin’s depravity, it also simultaneously destroyed the blackmailing power threat held over his head. Putin shrewdly calculated that by staging the kissing session, he could neutralise the blackmailers and would ‘get away with it’: which he has.

INCOMING PRESIDENT IS IN A STRONGER POSITION THAN PEOPLE MAY THINK
In summary, if President-elect is liable have false witness deployed against him by these odious operatives, that is not necessarily the end of the world for the incoming President. And the other side of the coin can be summarised as follows:

• Given that all the other characters on the stage will be serving at the President’s pleasure, he will be in a position to dispense with their services should they step out of line. In this connection, Mrs Hillary Clinton has already stepped out of line, according to The Guardian of 24th December 2008, which reported that:

‘The former first lady has wasted no time as she begins building up her team in preparation for taking over as America’s most senior diplomat from Condoleeza Rice’ in January 2009. ‘Sources in Washington suggested Mrs Clinton had embarked on an “empire-building” exercise as she seeks an expanded rôle within Mr Obama’s Administration’.

‘She wants a bigger budget and an expanded role for the State Department, not just in foreign affairs, but in dealing with global economic issues in the current financial crisis’ –

… code for she wants to continue ‘running the money’ as hitherto.

The Guardian further reported that ‘Mrs Clinton has told Mr Obama she wants to appoint high-profile special envoys. Her husband Bill has been suggested as a possible envoy to deal with Pakistan and India –

… code for positioning, reaffirming, revitalising and procuring the implementation (in part, by her CIA husband) of conduits for ongoing illicit financial transactions, and probably also for activation of that $2.0 trillion which at one stage ‘vanished’ into the bowels of the UBS office in India.

Other operatives (all of Jewish extraction, like herself) reportedly being considered by Mrs Clinton as she attempts to build up her State empire prematurely before she had even vacated her Senate seat or been confirmed (which she cannot be until she had vacated her Senate seat), include the well known globalist operative Richard Holbrook, Martin Indyk (a former US Ambassador to Israel), Jacob Lew (Clinton era head of the President’s Office of Management and Budget, and thus deeply involved in the falsification of budgetological numbers), and Mr James Steinberg, a former Deputy National Security Adviser to President Clinton.

Clearly, Mrs Clinton’s strategy is to inflate herself to the max ahead of Mr Obama’s Inauguration so that, as she imagines, he will find her impossible to oppose, or difficult to move: her calculations may also include the knowledge that President Obama would not be able to move her in the early years, not for 18 months, at least: during which time the extension of the illicit, fraudulent trading arrangements would have become embedded within the White House, so that the new President would be ‘unable’ to intervene.

PROMINENT RECENT ‘NEUTRALISATIONS’: IN MEMORIAM: LIST OF RELATED AND REPORTED
SUDDEN DEATHS (‘SUICIDINGS’) GROWING RAPIDLY: 5TH JANUARY 2009 WAS A ‘BAD DAY’
Before going any further, it is unfortunately necessary to review the various appalling publicised, mainly financial sector, ‘neutralisations’ that have taken place recently, as the struggle to procure the Settlements has intensified, in order to carry our investigation forward:

• Paulo Sergio Silva, aged 36, a trader for the brokerage arm of the Brazilian banking congolmerate Itau, was reported to have ‘shot himself in the chest’ during an afternoon trading session of the Sao Paulo commodities and futures exchange last November, stopping trading for 15 minutes.

• Kirk Stephenson, who helped start Luqman Arnold’s investment company Olivant Ltd., committed suicide, a British coroner’s court decided in December 2008. Stephenson, 47, jumped in front of a train on 25th September 2008, at the railway station in Taplow, near Maidenhead, located 28 miles west of London. The train was travelling at 100 miles an hour.

• Alex Widmer, Chief Executive of Bank Julius Baer, Zürich, aged 52, was reported by Reuters on 5th December to have ‘committed suicide’. Two unnamed ‘independent’ sources were cited by the Swiss News website 20Minuten to have stated that the death was a suicide.

Swiss police refused to comment on the death. A bank spokesman, however, was careful to point out for public consumption that there was no link between Widmer’s death and the group’s current [sic] activities, but declined to give further details on the cause of Widmer’s death, saying it was a ‘private matter’. The operative word here was ‘current’, implying that Widmer had been involved in questionable activities in the past: and indeed, further enquiries by this service confirmed that this interpretation is correct. Market sources have advised the Editor of this service that ‘the top Julius Baer banker was killed and we know why’: other sources have stated unequivocally to us that this was a murder, associated with the elaborate cover-up, retribution and ‘neutralisation’ operations that are taking place in the context of the Settlements crisis.

• Gavin Macdonald, aged 47, a top mergers and acquisitions banker, was reported on Monday 8th December 2008 to have died ‘from a heart attack’ at the London offices of Morgan Stanley in Canary Wharf. However he died on the preceding Friday night, so that his death was not in fact announced for at least 56 hours. Macdonald was Global Head of Mergers and Acquisitions for the institution. In view of the fact that he died ‘on Friday night’, there was plenty of lime for a ‘massaged line’ to have been developed to ‘explain’ his sudden death, which was attributed to ‘overwork’. Promptly on the Monday, Morgan Stanley’s CEO, John Mack, led tributes to the dead banker.

Mr Mack heads the institution within which a special suite devoted to the financing of terrorism, which we now refer to as the Terrorism Financing Center, is located. When the Provost Marshal attempted, with Department of Defense Internal Affairs assistance, to enter this room in October 2007, he was barred from entry on the orders of Vice President Cheney, to whom, ludicrously, he reported. You will have noted that THERE HAS BEEN NO DENIAL OF THIS INFORMATION – for the familiar reason, that the intelligence, which came from the actual ensuing investigation, is true.
Macdonald would of course have been aware of the existence of the Terrorism Financing Center, and may well have been considered a prospective threat to the ongoing cover-up operations. Mr Mack’s oleaginous tributes to Gavin Macdonald need to be considered in the foregoing context.

•Christen Schnor, aged 49, a Danish-born senior executive with HSBC bank, was discovered on Wednesday afternoon 17th December hanging by a belt, naked, in the wardrobe of his £500-a-night suite at the Jumeriah Carlton Tower Hotel, Cadogan Place, in Knightsbridge, London, having also rented a £390-a-day apartment for his wife and two children in Lower Sloane Street, in the same upper-class area. Schnor worked at HSBC’s Canary Wharf office. This death resembles that of Amschel Rothschild who was discovered hanging in a high-class hotel in Paris on 11th July 1996.

• Non-banking death: Michael Connell, an IT expert said to have been directly implicated in the rigging of George W. Bush Jr.’s 2000 and 2004 elections (since the Republicans cannot ‘win’ US elections without rigging them these days, as previously explained, due to deliberately arranged demographic factors) was killed on 19th December when his single-engine private plane crashed three miles short of Akron airport. Mr Connell was reported to have told a close associate that he was afraid that George Bush and Vice President Cheney would “throw [him] under a bus”.

It had earlier been verified that Carl Rove had threatened Connell and his wife, Heather (sounds familiar?). Mr Connell had flown to a small airport outside Washington DC on 18th December 2008 for a meeting. On 31st October, Mr Connell had appeared before a Federal Judge in Ohio after being subpoenaed in a Federal lawsuit investigating the rigging of the 2004 election under Karl Rove’s direction. The Judge ordered Mr Connell to testify under oath at a deposition on 3rd November 2008, the day before the election.

The White House is reported to have become extremely concerned that Mr Connell planned to divulge details of his secret illegal work for the White House. Heather Connell owns GovTech Solutions. Both GovTech and an IT firm called SmartTech of Chattanooga, TN, have been implicated in the rigging of the 2000 and 2004 elections and a White House email scandal.

In 2005, the US operative Andy Stephenson was poisoned with a substance capable of mimicking pancreatic cancer, after travelling the United States tirelessly exposing the wholesale falsification of election results using doctored software and rigged electronic voting machines, thus making a mockery of George W. Bush’s puffed-up boasting about ‘spreading democracy’ in the Middle East and elsewhere. Further exposure of this sub-scandal would be very liable to broaden and become engulfed in the colossal fraudulent finance unravelling that is taking place, which the criminalists are trying desperately to cover up, without success.

• René-Thierry Magon de la Villehuchet, 65, founding partner and CEO of Access International Advisors, was found dead with his wrists slashed on the morning of Tuesday 23rd December 2008, in his office at 509 Madison Avenue, New York. The French financier, an aristocratic society fund manager with a chateau in Brittany, was found at 7.50am with no pulse, in his office a couple of blocks from the Rockefeller Center. A spokeswoman for the New York medical examiner was careful to insist many hours later that it had not yet established the cause of death.

In other such cases, ‘sources’ have been in the habit of insisting that the death was a ‘suicide’.

The French financier employed a sizeable army of royally-connected ‘Alpine advisers’ to trawl the casinos, ski slopes and yacht clubs of Europe in frantic search of wealthy investors for investment in his fund, which in turn fed the demand for ‘replacement money’ for the Bernard L. Madoff Ponzi investment operations [see below]. M. de la Villehuchet’s connections and his own aristocratic pedigree enabled him to tap into a rich seam of intermediaries who helped to secure funds on behalf of Access, for onward placement with Madoff.

His ‘advisors’ included Philippe Junot, first husband of Princess Caroline of Monaco, and Crown Prince Michael of Yugoslavia, described as an ‘investor relations executive’. Families said to have invested with the French financier included the Rothschilds, other European grandees, and heirs to the L’Oréal cosmetics fortune, especially 86-year-old Liliane Bettencourt, daughter of the L’Oréal SA founder, Eugene Schueller, who is reported to have invested part of her fortune estimated at $22.9 billion with Bernard L. Madoff through the dead French financier. The 86-year-old holds a 30% shareholding in L’Oréal SA, which is the world’s largest manufacturer and purveyor of cosmetics.

In a letter dated 12th December 2008 to clients, Access International Advisors stated that funds, including its LUXALPHA SICAV-American Selection, were invested solely with Bernard L. Madoff’s investment firm. Data compiled by Bloomberg indicated that it had $1.4 billion in assets as at 17th November 2008. Reporting M. de la Villehuchet’s death on 24th December, The Daily Telegraph cited an anonymous source as stating that it was ‘highly likely’ that the French financier committed suicide, while a French newspaper report stated that he killed himself.

• Adolf Merckle, a German industrialist and billionaire, aged 74, was found on 5th January 2009 near railway tracks in southern Germany. The BBC reported on 6th January that Merckle had lost about 400 million Euros after wrong-way bets on Volkswagen shares. Herr Merckle’s business interests included Phoenix Pharmahandel, a drugs wholesaler with annual sales of about 21 billion Euros, Ratiopharm, a generic drugs company with annual sales estimated at 1.8 billion Euros, Heidelberg Cement, a cement firm with annual sales of 11+ billion Euros, the Kaessbohrer ski-slope equipment firm with sales of 183 million Euros, and VEM, a conglomerate of three engine manufacturers, with sales of 280 million Euros. The total turnover of the deceased’s conglomerate in 2008 was 30 billion Euros. The businesses employ about 71,000 people. Herr Merckle’s holding company had been in talks with banks to secure credit after it ran up high levels of debt.

In a statement, the family commented that ‘the distress to his firms caused by the financial crisis and the related uncertainties of recent weeks, along with helplessness of being unable to act, broke [him] and he ended his life’.

“News of Adolf Merckle’s death left me deeply shaken”, Baden-Wuerttemberg’s Prime Minister, Guenther Oettinger, said. The State had “lost a great entrepreneur”. In November 2008, the State Government signalled it would not assist Merckle after he sought a bailout. Herr Merckle had hired the insolvency lawyer Eberhard Braun and had threatened to initiate bankruptcy proceedings for VEM unless lenders provided him with restructuring capital, according to reports in December.

• WE DO NOT CONCUR WITH THE ABOVE: Merckle almost certainly ‘knew too much’ and appears to have been a victim of the DVD split identified by this service. It is inconceivable that a successful businessman as proficient as Merckle would have entered into one or more wrong-way bets with funds needed for his multiple enterprises. This ‘line’, publicised for public consumption, does not impress, and neither does it compute. Since the DVD and the Bushes HAVE LOST, we are looking at doors being slammed shut, and the slamming doors will be making quite a racket.

• The subtle point to be understood here is that until perhaps 5th January, the Bush Crime/DVD nexus thought they had ‘won’, which was an illusion AND HAS SINCE BEEN CONFIRMED TO THEM to be an illusion. Furthermore, they COULD NEVER ‘WIN’ without also destroying the Rockefellers through inter alia the collapse of JPMorgan Chase (a Germany-oriented bank, and the seat of the Terrorism Financial Center), which means that the Clintons (as the former President is of course a Rockefeller) could not in fact allow the Bushes to get away with their game. Therefore, ALL OF A SUDDEN, and all the more so in the light of certain developments, the Clintons will support the Settlements: which they cannot avoid in view of the reality set out at the top of this report.

• Steve Good, Chairman and Chief Executive of Sheldon Good & Co., a leading US real estate auction firm, was found with a gunshot to the head in his red Jaguar on Monday 5th January (the same day as Herr Merckle threw himself in front of a train near his Blaubeuren home in southern Germany). No suicide note was found with the body, suggesting thsi was yet another execution. Mr Good, who was Chairman of the US Realtors’ Commercial Alliance Committee, had a long-standing business relationship with Donald Trump, according to several reports dated 7th January 2009.

‘FEEDER’ PONZI FINANCIER MURDERED TO COVER UP ALPHA CONNECTION?
Concerning the case of M. de la Villehuchet, who was found at his desk with both wrists slashed, and a boxcutter and a bottle of sleeping tablets on the floor, we also beg to differ with the authors of the ‘received version’ promulgated so very smoothly for public consumption. This man, too, was almost certainly murdered, given his ALPHA involvement.

The La Tribune website stated that the financier ‘could not cope with the pressure following the outbreak of the scandal’, which is an understatement: he was desperately seeking replacement funds to satisfy his devastated aristocratic clients, implying in true Ponzi style, of course, that if such funds could by any remote chance have been procured, he would have disbursed them to refund the clients who had been severely affected or wiped out – leaving the problem of how to handle the new investors until further dupes had been inveigled to invest: but of course, raising any funds at all against the prevailing background, exacerbated by the globally publicised Madoff scandal itself, had by now become impossible.

So, yes, the financier was desperate. But one of the clues to the likelihood that he was murdered lies in the name of one of his funds, LUXALPHA SICAV-American Selection. Here’s why.

• The money invested in Madoff’s operations (THE MONEY ‘IN’) has not been LOST: It has been STOLEN – by associates of the George Bush-Clinton Crime Nexus. In order to understand this, several additional facts must be added here:

(1) It has been confirmed to us that Bernard L. Madoff was recruited into the global George H. W. Bush- controlled money-leveraging and laundering operations around 2005-2006: just when the $4.5 trillion sent over by the People’s Bank of China ostensibly to finance Leo Wanta’s payment became available for the highest-level financial fraudsters to play with. What a coincidence!

(2) It has been separately confirmed to us that Bernard L. Madoff had extensive insider dealer assistance for his Ponzi operations. He could not have operated without such assistance. The immense extent of this collaboration SHOULD emerge as the SEC’s investigations proceed:

• However this depends on the extent to which the SEC, SIPC etc investigations have already been ‘sown up’; and as indicated below, the initial impression gained is NOT ENCOURAGING.

(3) The Madoff operations formed a key component of the global financial corruption carousel presided over by the Bush-Clinton criminal high-level intelligence community gangsters.

René-Thierry Magon de la Villehuchet may have been murdered on the instructions of ‘Black Ops’ elements in order to prevent him exposing in detail the labyrinthine connections linking the Bush-Clinton Crime Nexus to the DELIBERATE takedown of Bernard L. Madoff and to the fact that the Madoff operations represented the Master Ponzi Scheme presiding over an army of subsidiary Ponzi Schemes. However the ‘neutralisation’ of de la Villehuchet cannot, obviously, prevent the inevitable connections being made between the Master Ponzi Scheme, the secondary ‘feeder’ Ponzi Schemes, and the overarching Bush-Clinton-CIA global fraudulent finance abominations being exposed in gory detail, as successive arms of the Octopus unravel and the extent of the biggest financial scandal in world history, and ALPHA’s role in it, is progressively unmasked.

• If those at the helm of this operation imagine that their intelligence connections will protect them in perpetuity, they may have a nasty shock coming to them, even though there may be evidence of a possible ‘insider’ operation to ‘contain’ the fallout from the ‘Madoff takedown’ [see below]. If our suspicions on this score prove to be correct, we would still consider the outlook for these highest-level US criminalists as grim, because the explosion is so huge that even with any ‘accommodating’ associates, they cannot realistically hope to prevent the audit trail from reaching their front doors.

• Also to be borne in mind is the fact that the SEC’s own-account operations, which are absolutely unconscionable for a Regulator, may be liable at any time to be exposed in detail, with the prospect of severe consequences for Mr Cox and others: so the SEC itself would appear to have a vested interest in ensuring that whatever emerges from the myriad complex investigations and the legal processes, is appropriately ‘sanitised’. Again, our view would be that it is FAR TOO LATE FOR ANY SUCH COVER-UP OPERATIONS TO BE WHOLLY ‘SUCCESSFUL’.

PRESIDENTIAL PARDONS WON’T SOLVE THEIR PROBLEM
Following the issuance of a handful of Presidential Pardons before Christmas, President Bush II is expected to ‘do a Clinton’ and promulgate an extended list of Presidential Pardons on 19th January 2009 just before he ceases to be the most disgraced President of the United States in the always disturbed history of the Republic. Observers expect a bumper crop of blanket pardons, including one for himself, which explains why Vice President Richard Cheney, of MK-Ultra notoriety, has been bragging on TV about how he authorised torture (satisfying his innate sadism).

But as mentioned in an earlier report, these people are financiers of international terrorism as defined in their own repressive domestic legislation and in the copycat anti-terrorism legislation promulgated in the European Union context and in the United Kingdom.

Their financial thievery and scamming operations against her Majesty The Queen, the sovereign of America’s supposedly ‘closest ally’, entitles them to be arrested, held in custody, indicted, tried and sentenced to the maximum period of detention, like the many thousands of bankers scooped in the autumn of 2007 and extradited to the United Kingdom and other European countries on charges of economic terrorism, as previously reported.

These former bankers received 25 years’ incarceration for their criminal activities, and many of the lawyers who rushed across the Atlantic to bail them out were likewise arrested as co-conspirators and accessories to the fact of these terrorism financing crimes, receiving similar treatment (as also reported on this website and of course never denied by anyone).

It follows, therefore, that this expected issuance of corrupt Presidential Pardons en masse will not get these criminals off the hook. They may rely upon the fact that their routine corruption has in turn corrupted leaders of European countries such as Chancellor Angela Merkel, who has been receiving bribes from George Bush Sr. in exchange for ‘protecting’ ‘his’ stolen and corrupt funds, or their fellow intelligence operative Gordon Brown, who has been exposed as corrupt, as we have revealed. But the fact remains that, at any stage in the future, any or all of these criminal financiers of global terrorism could be picked up the moment they step into the relevant jurisdictions.

THE SECONDARY ‘FEEDER’ FUNDS WERE SEPARATE PONZI FRAUDS
Stephen Harbeck, Chief Executive of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) who is the senior receiver of Madoff’s now defunct Ponzi-brokerage business, said on the 27th December 2008 that investigators were dealing with a ‘highly complex hybrid fraud’, elaborating that each of the individual investment accounts feeding the Madoff operations could be its own self-contained Ponzi fraud: and this is certainly the impression gained from de la Villehuchet’s desperate attempts to ‘replace’ the funds belonging to his portfolio of previously wealthy European investors.

Speaking on the steps of the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, Stephen Harbeck added: ‘We will trace funds wherever the trail goes’, implying that extensive use had been made of offshore tax havens.

A report in The Guardian on 28th December said that ‘forensic accountants examining Mr Madoff’s [multiple sets of] books believed he had regularly sent large sums of money to offshore accounts in the Caribbean area and Europe. ‘There are accounts at New York Mellon Bank that we have been looking at that appear to have sent and received money from offshore locations’.

Bank of New York Mellon is one of the exotic financial enterprises identified in our reports in 2007 which mishandled the $6.2 trillion of loan funds made available by Her Majesty The Queen and by Prince Al-Aweed al-Talal of Saudi Arabia. As this element of the scandal unfolds, the prospects of the highest-level criminals emerging unscathed is expected to diminish at an accelerating pace.

On 23rd December, US Bankruptcy Judge Burton Lifland ruled that Madoff investors could receive no more than $100,000 in cash compensation, no matter how much they lost – a development that will have come as a severe blow to investors such as Mr Walter Noel (Fairfield Greenwich Group), whose operations ostensibly lost $7.5 billion, while the women’s wear magnate and Madoff mentor Carl Shapiro is reported to have lost $545 million of his personal fortune [see our alphabetical list of ‘victims’ in respect ONLY of the money ‘IN’, below]. Judge Lifland invited all Madoff investors to attend a meeting at the US Bankruptcy Court on 18th February 2009.

PERTINENT QUESTIONS FOR THE BENEFIT OF ‘THE INTERESTED’
At this stage we ask the following questions concerning the financing of terrorism, and economic terrorism, which those whom Lenin called ‘the interested’ will certainly understand:

• What did and do the Clintons, Robert Rubin, Dr Alan Greenspan, Timothy Geithner, Dr Benjamin Bernanke, George W. Bush Jr., Henry M. Paulson, and Vice-President Richard Cheney have to do with Miapollo Investments Limited, Hong Kong, Apollo Management LLP, Eva Teleki, Leo Wanta, Olga Sarantopoulos, Golub Capital, Wasserstein Perella, Timothy Geithner (protégé of the guttural triple agent Dr Henry Kissinger), George H. W. Bush Sr., and Alpha [ALPHA] Bank in Greece: always bearing in mind who set up Miapollo Investments, Inc. and Apollo Management LLP for Bush Sr.?

• For what purpose did M. Jean-Paul Levitte, the former French Ambassador to Washington (now President Sarkozy’s closest intelligence and finance adviser), introduce a Mr Leon Black (not to be confused with a Mr Blue) to Crédit Lyonnais executives in Paris?

What can be stated at this stage is that the above-mentioned ‘worked with’ Mrs Hillary Clinton on the thieving of relevant accounts along with the Bushes, and that all are implicated with the ALPHA fraudulent finance and terrorism financing operation, which is still functioning. These fraudulent finance and terrorism financing operations were and continue to be committed in countries other than the United States, especially the United Kingdom, – so that all these people and their banking and intermediary associates, are specifically implicated in the financing of terrorism abroad. Under the Patriot Act USA et seq, financing terrorism abroad is a violation of the US legislation, qualifying the perpetrators to be arrested and incarcerated sine die, which is what ALL these double-minded perpetrators deserve and will, we believe, ultimately experience.

LONDON ‘SAFETY LOCK BOX’ RAIDS REMOVED THE COLLATERAL
When 300 armed Metrololitan Police surrounded and raided the three ‘Safety Lock Box’ centres located in Mayfair, Hampstead and Edgeware, London, on 2nd June 2008 under the command of Assistant Metropolitan Police Commissioner John Yates, stolen, illicit and other collateral assets being used for fraudulent finance hypothecation purposes were placed wholly out of reach of the criminalist cadres and the corrupt banking strata concerned.

As we reported at the time and have reported subsequently, the British police raids marked a decisive development, arising out of intelligence gleaned inter alia from bankers arrested and extradited to the United Kingdom in the autumn of 2007. It is unprecedented in our experience for such an enormous squad of armed police to attend such raids in Britain, indicating quite clearly to anyone not sitting on their brains that this was an operation of unprecedented importance and significance, involving facing down the most ruthless gangsters on earth. And this judgment has indeed turned out to be accurate.

MADOFF PONZI CAROUSEL THEN BECAME A PRIMARY SOURCE OF FUNDS
Because once the contents of the ‘Safety Lock Boxes’ had been placed out of reach (they remain under heavily armed guard, we understand), a central source of illicit creative fraudulent financing (of terrorism) had suddenly been closed down.

That left the Bernard L. Madoff complex of fraudulent Ponzi financing operations, and its colossal portfolio of feeder Ponzi self-contained fraudulent finance carousels as the primary source for the continuing flow of corrupt funds needed to keep the overall carousel going, with the exception of the Alpha operation (and probably several others, including the Omega operations). In summary, with the London ‘vaults’ shut down, the Bernard L. Madoff complex became the primary open source of funds (with the exception, as noted of the Alpha operation et al).

FIVE-HOUR EMERGENCY MEETING BETWEEN MRS CLINTON AND GEITHNER
When margin calls arising from the implosion that occurred in mid-September, when the $14.0 trillion of LOAN money held within the Treasury custodial accounts was placed into ‘lockdown’ (on Friday 12th September 2008) following measures taken on 6th September 2008 and subsequently in Britain, the Madoff-linked feeder funds and thus Mr Madoff’s own operations collapsed under their own weight. On 20th September 2008, the Editor received the ‘triple gunshot voicemail’. On 22nd September, Senator Hillary Clinton met Timothy Geithner, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, for at least five hours, issuing a bromise statement afterwards implying that she had in fact been discussing ‘economic reform’ with Mr Timothy Geithner – whereas in reality this was an emergency meeting to discuss how on earth to prevent the exposure of the fraudulent finance operations in which both were and are implicated up to their necks – in light of the developments since 6th and 12th September, and the volume of margin calls that were ensuing.

NEW YORK FED AND S.E.C INVOLVED IN THE MASTER SCANDALS
Among the relevant sources of exotic fraudulent finance caught up in the consequent maelstrom were funds submitted by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York under Timothy Geithner to the Bank of New York Mellon and funds associated with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s own in-house proprietary trading account, mentioned in an earlier report.

• For the New York Fed and the SEC themselves to have been involved in these operations represents a colossal pair of parallel scandals which should trigger indictments of the primary characters involved at both institutions – starting with Christopher Cox and Timothy Geithner.

When the Federal Reserve opened up the swap doors, they were taking in quasi-fungible assets (Treasury guarantees) and exchanging them for Euros which could then be deployed within the Swiss exotic trading operations. This revolutionary nexus of fraudulent finance, of economic and ‘financial terrorism’ offensives, is so huge that it cannot be explained in depth at this stage.

However we can summarise some of the stages of this immense fraudulent finance operation – winding up with the resulting dubious derivative fake ‘assets’ outstanding being ‘guaranteed’ by the Depositary Trust Clearing (DTC) Corporation, owned by the largest clearing banks, which has boasted that it has handled transactions ‘worth’ $1.8 quintillion, and has ‘guaranteed’ up to $700 trillion of derivatives contracts outstanding (taking account of double-counting).

BIG BANKS REFUSING CLIENTS ACCESS TO THEIR OWN FUNDS (= THEFT)
It is reported to us by respected and responsible market sources that one very large British bank, one very large German bank and one very large Swiss bank, in particular, are among institutions which have formed the habit in recent weeks of illegally refusing to release funds when instructed to do so by clients holding accounts with these institutions.

A case involving the UK institution resulted in the removal of a senior bank officer (also a diplomat) from the institution on Monday 29th December 2008, after the funds had been transferred from the bank’s Far East office to London, to fund a certain transaction.

• These banks are hoarding funds not least because they may expect to be called upon to fund guarantees entered into on their behalf by the Depositary Trust Clearing (DTC) Corporation, as an ever-increasing volume of related transactions ‘goes sour’. This factor is exacerbating the impact of the banks’ own corrupt off-balance sheet financial transactions on the real economy, and is the primary cause of the banks’ ‘lending strike’.

For the designers, perpetrators, intermediaries and traders involved in this biggest of all financial scamming operations NEVER THOUGHT THAT THE CAROUSEL WOULD RUN INTO TROUBLE, just as Charles Ponzi assumed that his classic scamming operation following the First World War could be continued ad infinitum. All concerned had and retained a vested interest in the continuation of this corrupt money machine, which has come unwound and will continue unravelling, contrary to their naïve and greedy expectations.

OUTLINE INFORMATION ABOUT CAROUSEL TRANSACTIONS
If we consider the Securities and Exchange Commission’s corrupt own-account transactions and supposedly borrowed (but now shown, post-Madoff, to have been STOLEN) funds, as our starting-point source of funds in an illustrative flow-chart, various stages can be described as follows:

• Leveraging of the sourced funds 3:1 in the United States.

• Transfer of the proceeds to the Swiss-based corrupt and exotic financing factory and issuance of bonds by the likes of Lehman Brothers, AIG, Bank of New York Mellon, Citibank and Morgan Stanley (funding for the bonds obtained from the Switzerland ‘money factory’ and direct out of the SEC’s own-account operations) at an 18% purchase price, for onward selling with a 30% mark-up, yielding an absolutely colossal 48% overall spread.

• Funds sent to Spanish institutions, especially Sr. Botin’s corrupt Banco Santander (which bought inter alia Alliance and Leicester and Abbey National in the UK), and probably onwards to corrupt institutions in the Southern Cone of Latin America, where Bush people have been congregating.

• Onward selling of the bonds, with a 30% backhander to the Bushes and 70% to other participants, including and especially the Bernard L. Madoff operations:

Since Madoff’s entities issued their own client confirmations and statements, Mr Madoff was able to juggle and obfuscate them with false accounting – a fact of real life that would appear to have been recognised ahead of the Madoff collapse, by Kingate Global Management, one of the ‘feeder Ponzi funds’ and one of the largest such subsidiary funds which had attracted some $2.75-$3.50 billion for investment in and ‘management by’ Madoff Investment Securities, Inc, despite having warned its investors that the Madoff brokerages ‘could abscond with those assets’.

In its fund prospectus, Kingate had warned that ‘there was always the risk that the assets with the investment adviser could be misappropriated. In addition, information supplied by the investment adviser may be inaccurate or even fraudulent. The co-managers [viz., Kingate and Tremont: see the alphabetical list below] are entitled to rely on such information (provided they do so in good faith) and are not required to undertake any due diligence to confirm the accuracy thereof’.

• This approach allowed Madoff to falsify the confirmations and statements issued to his clients. The Madoff Ponzi Carousel diverged from the ENRON operation in that ENRON employed a huge transnational firm of accountants, whereas Madoff used part-time accountants.

In parallel with, complementary to, and derived from such ongoing ‘money machine’ transactions, corrupt US Treasury and Citibank terrorism financing operations operate in outline as follows:

• Collateralized Debt Obligations (Mortgage Debt Securities etc) derived from Carlyle, AIG, Bush fraudulent finance and other linked sources are taken into the US Treasury/Citibank financing sub-machine to fund the master rotating derivatives underwriting machine – with the resulting new Collateralized Derivative Operations (CDOs) being delivered e.g. into the back-room operation of the complicit Bank of England (run, in 2007 at any rate, by a Carl Daniels, out of Birmingham but probably also linked to the US Embassy in London).

• Bank of England issues loans against the CDOs which are fed back to Carlyle, AIG and the Bush-Clinton Fraudulent Finance Empire and Carousel.

And the resulting outstanding derivatives obligations are all ‘guaranteed’ by the bank-owned private corporation calling itself the Depositary Trust Clearing Corporation, WHICH IS WHY BIG BANKS HAVE PROBLEMS, AND MAY COLLAPSE IF THE NEW ADMINISTRATION MESSES UP.

‘RETAIL’ INVESTORS’ FUNDS STOLEN TO FINANCE CAROUSEL PONZI FRAUDS
The ‘package people’, like the Madoff investors, have all been ripped off, too: but most of them can’t reconcile themselves to this reality. Earlier this year, President Bush Jr. (43) was quoted as having uttered evil words which, in translation, meant that these people can shout and scream to their dying day, and they will never receive a single cent. Many of these unfortunate victims have died without coming to terms with the fact that they have been scammed by these very self-same high-level self-appointed corrupt élite financial terrorists and fraudulent finance criminals that are being exposed by this service, as the biggest financial criminal crisis in world history unravels.

They cannot enforce anything inter alia because of ‘non-disclosure’ documents that they may have signed, the nebulous identities of the parties with whom they entered into their transactions, and the fact that, wittingly or otherwise, they breached the old Prudent Man Rule, which is not a legal matter but an issue of prudence which would weigh against them in any court proceedings which cannot be brought because the Ponzi frauds were structured so that no-one could ever be held accountable. That’s what we meant by the ‘Never-Pay Syndrome’ – invented by George H. W. Bush Sr., the physical embodiment of Lucifer on earth, and the technician with whom he has fallen out, Dr Alan Greenspan, whom the Bushite CIA dogs have recently punished by pulling down the House of Madoff and making off with the trillions and trillions of dollars’ worth of proceeds (money ‘OUT’).

Meanwhile, to keep the middle-class US investor victims from reaching in unison for their guns in their attacks, an elaborate, cynical Psy-Ops operation has been mounted by CIA counterintelligence cadres through controlled outlets and their possibly unwitting disciples for years, to keep all these victims expecting resolution at the end of the rainbow.

But their money has long since been STOLEN, and incorporated into the vast revolutionary self-enrichment Ponzi money machine for the odious Luciferian globalist elite – even as members of this discredited class are at each others’ throats now that their immense system of Ponzi scams is sagging or crumbling, and as the Bush Crime Family and associates make haste to shovel as much illicit money down to the Southern Cone as can be achieved within the very short space of time left for these people before they reap the consequences of their unspeakably cruel, selfish, ruthless, criminal and reprobate behaviour.

The above should not be construed as meaning that ‘the ransacked’ have no eventual remedy: but their condition is unfortunately probably as parlous as the victims of the Madoff Ponzi takedown.

• Whoever denies this is de facto assisting the CIA’s evil ‘Psy-Ops’ operation against the victims.

OTHER HIDEOUS DIMENSIONS OF THE POISON OF THE OCTOPUS
Of course that dimension is only one segment among a myriad past and ongoing scams, many of which are focused on ripping off officially sponsored programs at a Federal, State, county and city level via the courts, schools, parks and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-related projects, foundations, charities, cemeteries, hospitals, welfare agencies, nursing and home health care operations, you name it. These scams involve inter alia the use of ‘Asset-Backed Securities Trust Pools’ (2006-HES) and ‘Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates’ (Series 20006-HES).

Details of such scamming have been dug up by investigators into horrendous ongoing property-related scams in Arizona linked to NAMED high-level criminalists, and separately began to emerge during a recent Cook County foreclosure, in which the Judge ordered the bank and the victim into the hallway to ‘work out a settlement’: evidently the Judge didn’t want the relevant information to be revealed in Court, probably because his name was on the list and he himself was implicated.

Literally thousands of companies are associated with this scamming operation, using Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) as the transfer vehicle. In essence, these criminals, consisting of attorneys, judges, bankers and others, are simply transferring properties without the owners’ knowledge, prior to foreclosure, with most of the accounts in question found to be held with Fidelity Investments, we have been informed. The stolen property then becomes available as collateral for further fraudulent finance operations.

‘MAINSTREAM’ AND COURTS CONCERNED, FOR NOW AT LEAST, ONLY WITH THE MONEY ‘IN’
Concerning the Madoff dimension, in the foregoing survey, it will have been noted that while an estimated $50 billion is said to have been ‘lost’ as a consequence of the collapse of the Madoff operations, untold trillions of dollars came out the other end.

To elaborate: the US and global ‘mainstream’ media, as well as the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and the Bankruptcy Court, are ostensibly (to begin with, at any rate) concerned with the estimated ‘losses’ of $50 billion which have been widely publicised, based on the many documents filed with the Court (of which the Editor, by visiting the Court, obtained a complete set extant up to 21st December 2008, during his pre-Christmas visit to New York).

But that’s just the money ‘IN’.

NONE OF THIS MONEY HAS VANISHED. IT HAS ALL BEEN STOLEN.

What about the money ‘OUT’?

This, of course, as revealed above, is of a far larger order of magnitude, given the following:

• Leveraging operations doubtless conducted by Bernard L. Madoff’s office itself, perhaps at 3: 1, within the United States.

• Leveraging operations consistent with the illicit fraudulent finance operations that are typically conducted by the Bush-Clinton fraudsters, up to 40:1 which will have been conducted through Madoff’s London office, with counterparties in Britain. Switzerland, Spain, Austria, France, etc.

By means of the usual high-yield investment program leveraging and hypothecation operations, the base $50 billion will long since have been converted into trillions of dollars; and it is confirmed that the proceeds were transferred in large part via Israel to the Southern Cone of Latin America (Paraguay, Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil), where significant numbers of Bush-linked operatives and associates are reported to us to be congregating.

Significant proceeds will also have been transferred to Russia and/or converted into untraceable, portable precious gems like raw diamonds, held in Rotterdam or in London lock boxes such as those at Coutts Bank, used as the money-laundering institution for the Blair-Bush Deutsche Bank-Vatican Bank financing operation brokered by Bernie Ecclestone and laundered through Coutts Bank, which is The Queen’s Bank, acting as the clearing house and providing the operation with false ‘legitimacy’ behind Her Majesty’s back.

As we have seen, far from Madoff‘s operations having been ‘stand-alone’ from the gigantic Bush-Clinton-CIA orchestrated fraudulent finance giga-scandal that is unfolding, therefore, they formed a prominent and integral part of the overall global fraudulent finance Ponzi scamming machine.

Furthermore, the methodology employed to STEAL ALL THE MONEY (THE TRILLIONS, NOT JUST THE BILLIONS), was the standard procedure used by the US criminal intelligence community in all previous such instances – namely, to implode the operation.

STANDARD ‘BCCI PROCEDURE’: COLLAPSE THE ‘MONEY MACHINE’, RAKE OUT THE MONEY
That’s what they did with BCCI, walking away with over $9.0 billion clear. That’s the same model as was applied in the cases of ENRON and Iceland. And that’s what Bush Sr. ordered in the Bernard L. Madoff case. By imploding Madoff, the crooks GET TO WALK AWAY WITH THE LOT.

• That’s the crucial reality that everyone is MISSING. THE MONEY HAS ALL BEEN STOLEN.

No doubt the timing of the Madoff takedown was influenced by the consequences of the implosive events of September 2008, which will have triggered the thought in the minds of the top criminalist strategists that it was now time to apply the ‘BCCI treatment’, i.e. to close down Madoff altogether, let all the subsidiary Ponzi schemes and their investors flounder, make off with the ‘money OUT’ in toto, and (in Bush’s mind) deliver a body blow to the Jewish community and Israel at the same time.

POSSIBLE ISRAELI TIT-FOR-TAT FOR THE BUSH-TRIGGERED MADOFF TAKEDOWN
IN RETALIATION for this Bush-sponsored ‘BCCI/ENRON treatment’ of the Madoff Ponzi carousel, the Israelis have leaked supposedly devastating money-laundering and bribery information showing how Mossad and other Israeli parties reportedly transfer money from the Israeli Government direct into active US Congressional campaign accounts (illegal foreign donations), with funds also being wired directly from Israeli Government bank accounts into active personal accounts of Members of Congress. The sources publicising this information reportedly received electronic files showing bank account numbers, bank routing numbers and account numbers for NAMED Members of the the US House of Representatives, the US Senate, and even elected officials in various States.

The incoming data allegedly showed routing numbers of the receiving banks revealing that certain Members of the US Congress and of the US Senate have bank accounts in places like Barbados, Liechtenstein, Switzerland, the Turks and Caicos Islands, the Cayman Islands and London.

Electronic file data sent over to source from Israel was said to reveal names of leading US law firms and dubious front corporations all over the United States. However, significantly, ABSOLUTELY NO CONCRETE DETAIL, SUCH AS ACTUAL BANK ACCOUNT DATA, had been published by the 4th January 2009, the initial outline surfacing via a non- anonymous website on New Year’s Eve.

Whether this data ‘firms up’ into hard information or not, the context in which it should be viewed at this stage is that it could represent a direct Israeli tit-for-tat ‘Psy-Ops’ operation in response to the body blow inflicted upon Jewish interests as a consequence of the Bush-Clinton-triggered Madoff takedown. We are well into the ‘Samson’ period now: the gloves are off everywhere.

Even if the data is not confirmed, it surfaced specifically in the context of the Madoff ‘takedown’, albeit clothed by the leak source as motivated by disgust at the onslaught against the Palestinians, of whom more than have been reported were stated to have died. The source added: ‘I intend to publish this information, including names, dates and account numbers, on the web’.

• By 4th January, an estimated 260,000 Palestinians lacked water and roughly the same number lacked electricity. Some 80% of the population relies on food aid, requiring 400 food trucks a day into the Gaza Strip. Only 100 trucks are being allowed in, according to the BBC.

STOKING UP ANTI-SEMITISM: A CYNICAL ‘ADDED BONUS’ FOR THE REVOLUTION
Now, on the back of this, Mr Bush Sr. and his fellow Nazis (notwithstanding that the Bushes are German Jews, originally) will have relished the prospect of destroying large numbers of competing Jewish foundations, investors, competitors, and other entities and enterprises – reducing Palm Beach, which was infiltrated and basically taken over by Americans of Jewish extraction from the 1960s onwards, to a state of near-hysteria, given that Jewish sources with whom we are in contact state that many Jewish investors there have been ‘wiped out’. We received a report (see below) of Jewish people in Palm Beach having been reduced to selling their Christmas/holiday presents in desperate hand-to-mouth attempts to raise liquidity.

• In an interesting by-product of this development, certain Jewish foundations that have been wiped out or rendered useless in the New York area, had been financing revolutionary agitprop operations promoting homosexual marriage and the usual array of leftish Gramsci-tradition cultural revolutionary abominations designed to destroy what remains of Christian standards and culture, a key objective of angry, deluded Babylonian revolutionary Jews: the takedown of these people has put a stop to these activities in some instances.

As a clear consequence of the revelations from the Madoff scandal so far, latent anti-Semitism (as anticipated by this service) has predictably intensified. On 20th December 2008, Agence France-Presse reported from New York that ‘anti-Jewish commentary is inundating the Internet following Bernard L. Madoff’s arrest on charges of masterminding one of the biggest Wall Street frauds in history’ [sic] – indicating of course that the media will continue focusing on the Madoff dimension, as intended, while the much bigger perpetrators behind Madoff consolidate their getaway with the ‘money OUT’ as described in outline here.

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) reported that there had been “an outpouring of ant-Semitic comments on mainstream and extremist websites”. The French agency cited an ADL statement that ‘site users have posted comments ranging from deeply offensive stereotypical statements about Jews and money – with suggestions that only Jews could perpetrate a fraud on such a scale – to conspiracy theories about Jews stealing money to benefit Israel’,

Abraham Foxman, National Director of ADL, elaborated:

‘Jews are always a convenient scapegoat in times of crisis, but the Madoff scandal and the fact that so many of the defrauded investors are Jewish has created a perfect storm for the anti-Semites. Nowadays, the first place Jew-haters will go is to the Internet, where they can give voice to their hateful ideas without fear of repercussions’.

Among entries reported to be featured in the electronic files referencing financial transfers from Israeli Government bank accounts to bank accounts in the United States is a series of entries showing transactions between Loh’ama Psichologit to the Anti-Defamation League in New York City. A Google search for Loh’ama Psichologit shows it to be the Literature and Propaganda segment of the Israeli intelligence organisation Mossad.

The Editor has a friend who is Education Director of a Jewish School and Synagogue in a certain US State. In discussion about the misbehaviour of certain people of Jewish extraction some years ago, the Editor pointed out that these people seemed intent on repeating the mistakes of the past and on stoking the latent fires of anti-Semitism. The Editor recalls his friend’s exact response:

‘Yes and these people cause our community immense concern all the time’.

Our unsolicited advice to Mr Foxman is that he should direct severe criticism publicly, or behind the scenes if he prefers, to his own community, and should issue grave warnings to these people about the prospective consequences of Jews being identified as perpetrators of financial frauds in the prevailing climate. The fact that almost all the identified victims of the Madoff scandal that have been identified to date are Jewish, misses the point – which is that no distinction is liable to be made in the minds of those criticising the Jewish community, between victims and perpetrators.

Likewise, in ‘a very worst-case scenario’ that history again repeats itself, no distinction whatsoever will typically be made between those Jews perceived to be villains, and righteous Jews. That is the danger on which Mr Foxman and his friends should be concentrating.

In case some people are still mystified as to why there is warfare among the Jews, may we remind you of the Editor’s old story about the nice lady who took pity on him when he was employed briefly with the merchant bank S. Japhet & Co., St Swithin’s Lane, in the City of London, in 1959. It was the time of the Eichmann trial. The middle-aged Jewish lady used to sit with your young correspondent occasionally in the canteen. To the Editor’s naïve question: ‘What’s this all about? Eichmann’s Jewish!’ the lady replied: ‘Didn’t you know? A Jew’s greatest enemy is another Jew?’

DOUBLE-MINDEDNESS AND THE DOUBLE-CROSS TRADITION
In addition, one must remain aware at all times, as this giga-criminal finance scandal continues to unfold, of the ‘double-mindedness dimension’ characteristic of all key operatives. These people are ALL double-minded, in direct contravention of Jesus Christ’s warning on this central issue:

• ‘The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single,
thy whole body shall be full of light’.

‘But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness.
If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!’
Matthew, Chapter 6, verses 22-23.

‘The light of the body is the eye: therefore when thine eye is single, thy whole body also is full of light; but when thine eye is evil, thy body also is full of darkness’.

‘Take heed therefore that the light which is in thee be not darkness’.
Luke, Chapter 11, verses 34-35.

One of the layers of deep meaning here is that double-mindedness is wholly evil and represents, therefore, TOTAL darkness. It is often noted that the criminals we identify can be quite pleasant to meet (albeit there is always a spooky dimension to all of them). But their fake ‘niceness’ masks the fact that their orientation is in fact the opposite. They pose as ‘reasonable’, ‘decent’ people, but their eye is evil: they are Dark Actors Playing Games. Furthermore, they employ the duplicitous dialectical method at all times. Hence, in summary, they routinely:

• Say one thing and do the opposite;

• Double-cross their collaborators and associates;

• Renege on all their undertakings; and:

• Relish application of the standard duplicitous intelligence community ‘bait and switch’
technique to entrap their targets.

Now George W. Bush Sr. ROUTINELY DOUBLE-CROSSES EVERYONE WITH WHOM HE DEALS, and there are NO exceptions to this rule. The same applies to his duplicitous son. So do not be in any way amazed, sceptical or scandalised that Bush Sr. and his criminalist intelligence associates will have specifically pulled the rug from beneath their collaborator, Bernard L. Madoff.

‘MADOFF TAKEDOWN’ RELEASED TRILLIONS TO BE STOLEN WITH EASE
On the contrary, this operation has released trillions of dollars (probably running into the hundreds of trillions) into the hands of the criminalist operatives directed by the Bush-Clinton-CIA Octopus, while at the same time destroying a large part of the Jewish community and delivering a bodyblow to Israel in the process. After all, Bush Sr., of German Jewish extraction, consorts with the Arabs.

Therefore so far as the ‘German’ element of the Octopus is concerned, the Madoff takedown has been a superbly ‘successful’ operation – releasing immense resources ‘free’ into its hands, while undermining Jewish elements in the process. Don’t forget, either, that each arm of the Octopus is permanently entwined with other arms, locked in struggles to the death – with every component of the Octopus at various times or simultaneously at loggerheads with or fighting other arms, or all of the arms. After all, Satan is the author of all lies and confusion, which is the stinking River Styx of death in which these world-class criminals operate.

• That they will all drown in its foul waters is a certainty.

GLOBALIST STRATEGISTS DESTABILISED BY SUCCESSIVE EXPLOSIONS
So, despite occasional confusing appearances to the contrary, the global financial showdown that we predicted is now blowing up in the faces of almost all the primary Illuminati cadres and figures, with linked secondary explosions going off at intervals at an ever increasing pace – leaving the criminalist participants, for the most part, staggering around shouting and snapping at each other incoherently. Even so, there are still some of their caste, equipped with fewer brain cells than their comrades-in-crime, who would appear to have not yet understood that there has been a decisive discontinuity, thanks to the relentless exposures, and that the criminal finance community have been rumbled, and are being progressively brought to their knees.

Their Dirkeim Paradigm – after Emile Durkheim [1858-1917], who postulated that criminal behaviour is humanity’s norm and that ethical conduct is anomalous – has been turned on its head, so that the criminalists are now increasingly seen to be the anomie, with the Rule of Law, however degraded and corrupt, starting to reassert its primacy in the United States, at least in patches.

This development, to which this service has contributed, has come as a nasty shock to those criminalists who have grasped the outline of what has happened, because they had been in the ascendancy and in control for 25 years, and truly believed that their Criminal Republic had been successfully established and could never be challenged, let alone dislodged.

They thought that their fake wealth factory, based on hypothecating often stolen or diverted assets up to 40:1 (in London, for instance), would continue for ever. And they imagined that no-one would or could ever stand up to them, given their long-term success in compromising, through blackmail and/or bribery, almost everyone on their darkened stage.

Instead of which the successive bombs that have gone off and continue to explode ‘unexpectedly’ in their faces (and will continue to do so for many years ahead) have disfigured their self-righteous images of false rectitude, so that the whole world can now see these double-minded, two-faced rats for what they are: the greedy, decadent scum of the earth who have had their filthy day, and large numbers of whom face (or are already serving) extended periods of imprisonment, with 25 years apparently the norm. Others have suffered ‘neutralisation’ – the currently fashionable euphemism for being bumped off.

UNPRECEDENTED ADMISSION BY THE IMF MANAGING DIRECTOR THAT ELITE IS TO BLAME
It is against this background that one of the most prominent members of the contemporary self-appointing élite, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, has actually become the first of their number to acknowledge publicly that an attempt really has been made by this self-same arrogant, globalist Elite Power Continuum, to steal the wealth of the whole of humanity for themselves.

Specifically, the Fund’s Managing Director warned in a speech given in Madrid on 16th December 2008 that ‘social unrest may happen in many countries – including advanced economies… Violent protests could break out in countries worldwide if the financial system is not restructured to benefit everyone rather than a small élite’.

In a BBC interview on 21st December, M. Strauss-Kahn said ‘we are in the biggest crisis we have experienced for 60 or 70 years’, and indicated that the IMF forecasts due in January 2009 would be even bleaker still. However as the Managing Director of the Fund knows that the underlying cause of the crisis is unfettered fraudulent finance, stealing and criminality, he is also well aware that no forecast that Fund’s experts may issue in the foreseeable future will capture the horrors in store – given that, in the face, for instance, of all our exposures, the US criminalists have CONTINUED with their fraudulent finance operations, long after they have been exposed in general terms, resisting implementation of the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme, which will implement capital markets transactions on-the-books to refinance the banks and to endow the US Treasury with a stream of windfall tax receipts on an ongoing basis.

The intention, up to the end of 2008 at any rate, was to apply the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme but to run it through the White House – where, of course, it would be corrupted and would immediately revert to corrupt debt-generating fiat money ‘business as usual’. As indicated above, this intention has been thwarted.

Never before has a member of that self-appointed élite openly warned that its own behaviour was risking a global upheaval: indeed, never before has a member of that élite even acknowledged that it exists as an organised force for evil. Those of us who have done our due diligence know this to be the case; but it is unprecedented for a superior member of the caste to agree with us. French journalists inform us that the highly intelligent IMF Chief is known for his clear thinking and for his commendable verbal precision and directness. One may deduce, therefore, that this observation represented a blunt warning to the few high-level criminalists who were still seeking to resist the inevitable as late as the Christmas week, that their behaviour cannot be tolerated any longer.

M. Strauss-Kahn’s remarks echoed those of another ‘insider’, Senator Christopher Dodd, Stalin’s grandson, who, commenting on the banks hoarding money, told The New York Times in October that ‘if it turns out that they are hoarding, you’ll have a revolution on your hands. People will be so livid and furious that their tax money is going to line their pockets instead of doing the right thing’.

‘There will be hell to pay’.

It would appear that even high-ups among the self-appointing globalist élite have realised that the most prominent criminalist operatives within the folds of the Octopus have overstepped the mark – threatening the collapse of the entire financial system, having chosen throughout the build-up to the present defining moment, to assume that certain banks faced liquidity problems, rather than a SOLVENCY crisis (of their own making, but a solvency crisis nonetheless).

It is unprecedented for representatives of the Illuminati-associated structures to issue warnings against their own fellow perpetrators.

BANKS HOARDING MONEY IN CASE DTC GUARANTEES ARE CALLED
Meanwhile, as the fragile world financial economy hovers on the brink of catastrophe with, as Senator Dodd has correctly gauged, the banks hoarding the funds that have been doled out by governments, the main issue early in January 2009 was: why are they doing this?

• The correct answer to this question is broader than the popular generic assumption that the banks are hoarding cash in order to avoid bankruptcy.

The reality was that the big complicit institutions have been hoarding fungible cash-cash to post against the vast derivatives exposures (see above) (on the working assumption that it cannot be that the guarantees will all have to be applied at once), in accordance inter alia with their stringent obligations under Basel-II. In the United States, the two institutions in the deepest trouble in this respect are Citibank and JP MorganChase.

These institutions have not only hoarded the cash dished out to them by the Treasury under the corrupt Henry M. Paulson Jr., which means that Mr Paulson has been bribing them to refrain from disgorging the Settlements funds, but have also, as repeatedly reported by this service, duly held onto and illegally presided over the exploitation of the $14 trillion on-the-books LOAN money made available to them for the sole purpose of financing the Settlements by Her Majesty The Queen, Prince Al-Aweed Al-Talal, and the Chinese parties.

These LOAN funds were made available by these highest-level parties in 2007 so as to finance the Settlements and thereby to provide the on-the-books resources to start the aforementioned G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme of capital markets transactions which will liquefy the banks on-the-books, while providing the Treasury with an ongoing cascade of tax receipts at 35% per annum out into the future – all ON THE BOOKS, as opposed to the prevailing Durkheim Octopus ‘system’ of debt-oriented legalised corruption which has resulted in the proliferation of unfunny money out to infinity stashed untaxed in offshore accounts for self-enrichment purposes and the financing of ‘Black Ops’ adventures and abominations.

• The LOAN funds, held from mid-September onwards in ‘lock-down’ so that they could not be used for ANY purpose other than to finance the Settlements, were lodged within the custodial group within the JPMorganChase US Treasury suspense account with Citibank.

When the $14 trillion LOAN funds were placed into lockdown effective 12th September 2008, they were at once subject to a stronger category of control than is implied by the word ‘frozen’, which we can certainly assert metaphorically to mean that tampering with one cent of such funds would be tantamount to an act of war.

As soon, then, as the said LOAN funds were placed into ‘lockdown’, the stock market and related sectors imploded and threatened to collapse. It then immediately transpired, given this collapse of the stock market during the week ending 19th September 2008, that the $14 trillion of LOAN funds had been illegally deployed to prop up the illicit US interbank carousel and to provide the base for leveraging and hypothecation operations – facilitating corrupt exotic ‘business as usual’, which was ‘why’ the Settlements had been delayed for a good 15 months beyond the approximate stage that the LOAN funds were first made available to replace the funds that had earlier been diverted, stolen and/or encumbered, including the $4.5 trillion that was provided by the People’s Bank of China in May 2006 referenced in our earlier reports.

The ‘lockdown’ of the LOAN funds, buttressed by the backwash from the London ‘Safety Lock Box’ raids on 2nd June 2008, has driven all subsequent events, forcing the US criminalists to the wall (where they risk being shot) and lighting the fuse for the series of bomb explosions, which will be prolonged and will continue for many years.

Unsurprisingly, it was on Saturday 20th September 2008, within days of the 12th September 2008 ‘lockdown’ of the $14 trillion, that the Editor of this service received the ‘triple gunshot voicemail’ reported earlier. It can now be revealed that the message conveyed by this macabre voicemail was this: ‘We will kill you for what you have done’.

CORRUPT ‘BUSINESS AS USUAL’ PLANS IN DISARRAY
However the outcome has so far been encouragingly different. In the first place, Robert Rubin, the Clintons’ Citibank-based financial ‘minder’ (guardian of the Clintons’ ill-gotten gains, including illicit profits derived from the exploitation of Her Majesty The Queen’s gold which was diverted during the ‘unscheduled’ British banking ‘black hole’ shutdown on 29th-30th March 2007) – was ordered to ‘get your … out of Citibank immediately’, in mid-December.

When we followed this intelligence up, we were advised that Rubin’s presence within this criminal enterprise being no longer required, he had been faced with no choice but to hasten for the exit. However as the ALPHA operation (and possibly other CIA covert criminal financing operations) are still running, one can take it as read that this hands-on fraudulent finance specialist is still up to his neck in related activities.

On 4th December 2008, The New York Post reported the progress of an investigation of the rôles of Mr Robert Rubin and the former Citibank CEO Chuck Prince in what the newspaper called ‘a Ponzi-style scheme that’s now choking world banking’, implying that some ‘mainstream’ journalists have belatedly been following this website after all. The report gave outline details of a Federal lawsuit by Citigroup investors represented by the law firm Kirby McInerney, which had produced a 500-page report alleging what the paper described as ‘a complex cover-up of toxic securities that spread across the globe, wiping out trillions of dollars in their destructive paths’.

Investor plaintiffs in the suit have accused Citigroup management of ‘overseeing the repackaging of unmarketable Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) that no-one wanted – and then reselling them to Citibank and hiding the poisonous exposure off the books in shell entities’.

The lawsuit stated that ‘when the bottom fell out of the shaky assets, Citigroup’s stock values collapsed, wiping out more than $122 billion of shareholder value’, but that Rubin and other top insiders cashed out for themselves via ‘suspicious’ share sales ‘calculated to maximize the personal benefits from undisclosed inside information’.

The investigation conducted by Kirby McInerney was applied to amend and add new details to a blanket investor lawsuit filed against Citigroup following the exposures by this service in the fall of 2007. Consequent upon our exposure of the recycling of the standard ‘Bernie Cornfeld’-style Ponzi scheme technique, the amended lawsuit called ‘the actions of Citi leaders “a quasi-Ponzi scheme” to hide troubles – and keep Citi stock afloat while insiders unloaded about three million shares’ between 1st January 2004 and 22nd February 2008 for huge profits.

The Complaint named Citigroup, Rubin, Mr Prince, Vice Chairman Lewis Kaden, ex-Chief financial Officer Sallie Krawcheck and her successor, Gary Crittenden. The suit specifically stated that Rubin cleared $30.6 million on his stock sales, while Prince cleared $26.5 million, former Chief Operating Officer Robert Druskin grabbed nearly $32 million and the former Global Wealth Management unit chief, Todd Thomson, enriched himself by $25.7 million.

• The significance of this case is that it adds to the pressure on the criminal enterprise on top of all the other pressures, including the ever-present possibility (at the time of posting) that the LOAN funds provided inter alia by Her Majesty the Queen might be called at any time.

SUCCESSIVE WAVES OF DEFAULTS OUT TO 2012-2014
The bombs set off by the events of last September are exploding all over the place, and they will continue exploding for the next four or five years as components of the nexus of financial fraud peak in succession (the so-called ‘sub-prime’ element being only the first of the megaton nukes to have exploded to date). Still to explode between 2009 and 2012/2013/2014 into a chasm of defaults, are other manifestations of the legalisation of financial corruption, such as Credit Default Swaps (CDSs) and all forms of securitised fake ‘assets’, Alternate A ‘assets’, and ‘Adjustables’.

In non-technical language, the Credit Default Swap overhang matures and peaks in 2009, while the derivatives ‘originated’ on the basis of other residential assets, commercial property, credit cards and auto loans will ‘peak’ in disorderly sequence between 2009 and 2012-14. This means that even when remedial circumstances such as the actual implementation of the on-the-books G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme do come on-stream, high-yield residual financial sector nukes will still be exploding ‘unexpectedly’, taking the ‘mainstream’ media by surprise, as usual. There is nothing to be done now about this state of affairs.

THE STRENGTHENING OF BARACK OBAMA’S POSITION
Ever since he was briefed by the FBI in Chigaco on the day following his election victory, President-Elect Barack Obama, who ‘blew up’ himself when the duplicity of associates was revealed to him on that and subsequent occasions and who soon came to understand that his prerogative to appoint whom he liked to serve in his Administration had been somewhat pre-empted for him by the prior construction of a shell Administration for the Elite Power Continuum for him to accept on a ‘take-it-or-leave-it’ basis, Mr Barack Obama has demanded finalisation of the Settlements.

And as noted, he has himself been responsible for two of the most critical appointments – to the leadership of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Office of Management and Budget.

THE FATE OF DELUDED HOLD-OUTS AGAINST THE SETTLEMENTS
As his position strengthened with the waning of the CIA’s sterile rearguard Bush-Cheney Internet campaign to discredit Barack Obama, and the Electoral College outcome on 11th December proved favourable to the President-Elect as expected, the President-Elect’s insistence on completion of the Settlements, to the fury of the Bush criminalists, has driven events at a hectic pace.

On Friday 18th December, Mr Obama warned that some 100 key people – including Attorneys whose firms must distribute the Settlement funds to the 1,000-odd Trustees for onward remittance – who have been protected hitherto, would cease to enjoy all immunity from the consequences of their complicity in financial crimes with effect from Monday 22nd December: indicative of the fact that if they were to impede the Settlements (as always, on the orders of Bush Sr.), they would be arrested, like the scores of bankers in Europe who have been arrested in successive waves over the past several weeks, and since the fall of 2007. On 18th December we received a report, for instance, to the effect that a further 12 ‘sleepers’ impeding the Settlements had been cuffed.

On 16th December 2008, it was reported/confirmed that five key Trustees in Europe had been arrested; and it is believed that these people were ‘taken down’ for prolonged periods.

• In addition, a not inconsiderable number of ‘sleepers’ and others taking orders from the imploding George Bush Sr. apparat have, in recent weeks been ‘neutralised’ – this being the currently fashionable euphemism for ‘liquidated’.

On 23rd December (5.35pm) the Editor was advised that a significant number of bankers and others had been ‘arrested’, taken away, ‘neutralised’ (liquidated) on the preceding day, in line with similar operations on the two preceding days and earlier. On 26th December 2008, it was confirmed to us that President Sarkozy, on behalf of all the European Union’s ‘Member States’, had issued ‘a final ultimatum’ to the criminalist US authorities for the Settlements payouts to be finalised by the end of the year (when Sarkozy’s six-month rotating EU Presidency came to an end), although as President of France, his ‘mandate to pay’ extracted from President George W. Bush at Camp David would not be affected (as the White House may have assumed). It was also confirmed to us from the United States that, despite everything that has happened, President George W. Bush STILL thought he was in charge of the Settlements process, given that the familiar blocking games played by the Bushes all along continued seamlessly following Sarkozy’ acquiring his ‘mandate to pay’.

On 28th December 2008, in a repetition of the familiar sterile obfuscating delay antics, a Trustee reported several instances of Trustees failing to turn up at banks for payouts, as has often been reported all along (one of the standard sabotage techniques) and that ‘they are working furiously to get everyone in place’, with ‘feelings really frayed right now’ – not that they have not been frayed ever since this service became involved with this crisis.

But for such a source to mention ‘frayed feelings’, giving the standard habit of understatement, reflected the extreme fractiousness of the situation, which has led to many sudden deaths, with more in the pipeline, according to our information. However, so successful has the Bush-Cheney disinformation, diversion, expectations-manipulating ‘Psy-Ops’ apparatus been throughout this coordinated operation to scam every target imaginable, that none of this unspecific ‘information’ can ever be relied upon: it is foolhardy for people to do so. Such ‘information’ can only become reliable when backed up by indpendent sources, as in the case of the jailed bankers in the UK.

The authorities under the incoming Administration would have the option of foreclosing on both Citibank and JPMorganChase in the event (as appeared to be the case immediately ahead of the Christmas holidays) of their continued intransigence, after partial completion of the Settlements in favour of ‘the countries’ on Thursday 18th December, which was the date when the US Treasury guaranteed value and the country recipients were said to have been ‘paid out’.

SHOUTING MATCH OVER PAYOUTS TO U.S.-BASED RECIPIENTS
But when it came to paying out the US-based recipients, the Editor gathered that a blazing row, or ‘shouting match’ developed, involving recalcitrant American refusals to disgorge tranches of the LOAN funds to US recipients. This row may have focused inter alia on the illegality of Citibank and other institutions even contemplating further misapplication of elements of the $14 trillion in ‘lockdown’ which could NOT be touched except for Settlements disbursement purposes.

According to our sources, the explosive international slanging and shouting match started on Friday 19th December 2008, when the US tranches of the Settlements were stalled, and was still continuing on Saturday 20th December, immediately ahead of the Editor’s return to London from New York on Sunday 21st December.

In the second place, the bailout providing loans worth $17.4 billion to Detroit automakers reflected NOT the desperate plight of the US motor manufacturers, but rather alleged EXTREME FEAR in the White House and the Treasury that if General Motors and Chrysler were to be placed into Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the consequent investigations would expose the fact that these household names’ balance sheets are stuffed with fraudulent securitised derivative assets, and that their accounts had been falsified for years since such dubious assets had been treated for accounting purposes as though they are ‘real’ assets – which is not the case, as they are worthless, although the system of legalised corruption dictates otherwise.

UGLY SITUATIONS FACING KEY PLAYERS
Any Trustee appointed under Chapter 11 procedures would be bound to report such information, which would set off colossal further aftershocks throughout the financial system, coming on top of the Madoff takedown which will continue setting off landmines way out into the future, despite any evidence of ‘insider’ attempts to contain the fallout – not least within the offices of the Securities and Exchange Commission, which allowed these corrupt practices to flourish (even as the SEC has been participating in the fraudulent finance trading operations on own account), in the context of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 and the associated weakening of the stringent US securities legislation of 1933 and 1934, which, however, still applies and should have been enforced.

The fact that the Deposit Trust Clearing Corporation (DTCC) has been ‘guaranteeing’ these false securitised ‘derivatives’ assets, and has even boasted about clearing $1.8 quintillion of such junk as noted above, does NOT ‘guarantee’ the ‘value’ of such assets, given that they are intrinsically worthless: it simply confirms that the legalisation of US financial corruption has comprehensively failed to disguise the real-world reality that such false ‘assets’ are both illegitimate AND worthless, even though the legitimisation of corruption prescribes the opposite.

DECISION TO APPLY THE ‘BCCI/ICELAND/ENRON TREATMENT’ TO MADOFF
In the third place (but perhaps slightly in the wrong order), on Thursday 11th December, which we believe is about when the carousel finally ran out of fresh ‘IN’ resources altogether – as the events of mid-September had led to the drying-up of the secondary market, thus precluding the tapping of the secondary and tertiary markets for prop-up funds – all of the leading corrupted financial players suddenly discovered, in sync, that the cupboard was bare. Faced with this prospect, the Bush Sr. Crime and CIA criminal enterprise apparat is believed to have decided to apply the ‘BCCI treatment’ to the Madoff Ponzi scamming machine and its subsidiary Ponzi operations – just as it had earlier pulled the plug on ENRON and, more recently, Iceland, a conveniently located fraudulent finance platform established/exploited by Bushite associates (e.g. Khaled Aziz, Hospice Trust, etc).

The routine practice appears to be that as soon as one of these Ponzi fraudulent finance carousels reaches a tipping point, the criminal finance engineers deliberately allow the fake money machine to implode, rakes all the cash out for itself, and leaves all the deluded investors and (in this case) the subsidiary Ponzi investor funnels dangling, like the ‘package people’.

One consequence of this development was that lame-duck President George W. (Dog) Bush Jr. was reported to have asked his lawyers whether he could continue to stall on the Settlements (so that he could wind up stealing some more money) and what would the likely consequences be for him personally if he did so. Our sources informed us that his corrupt lawyers responded words to the effect: ‘Well, you’ve got away with it so far, so what’s the problem?’

By responding corruptly in this manner, the President’s co-conspiratorial Attorneys revealed how far behind the curve and how compartmentalised they have remained, since the reality is that Bush II has NOT ‘got away with it’ and is manifestly defeated and stretched flat out on the rack, despite theatrical appearances to the contrary. The Bushes may THINK that they have raked out all the money and have ‘won’, but as explained above, they are liable to lose the lot.

In any case, since President Sarkozy obtained his ‘mandate to pay’, the outgoing President Bush has not been in control of events, even though it is clear from this episode and from his behaviour generally that he thought he was still in charge. Maybe it all depends on his daily intake.

BELATED OPERATION TO DISCREDIT PRESIDENT SARKOZY
Meanwhile an operation was noted in December 2008 apparently to destabilise President Nicolas Sarkozy and to place him under a cloud, focused on the huge Clearstream corruption and money-laundering scandal that has grown a new leg – with inter alia the revelation, extracted from widely available Clearstream historical spreadsheets, that Sarkozy holds or held two secret accounts in false names, Paul de Nagy and Stéphane Bosca. We were suspicious of this sudden eruption, given that the ‘intelligence’ proffered and pilfered for international public consumption was extracted from documentation that has been circulating for several years; so it represented nothing new.

But specifically, it was reported on 18th December 2008 that Sarkozy might soon be facing renewed charges that he was at the receiving end of corrupt foreign funds through the Luxembourg-based Clearstream entity. President Sarkozy’s father’s full name was M. Nicolas Paul Stéphane Sarkösy de Nagy-Bosca. The Clearstream money-laundering scandal connects directly with American political and ‘Black Ops’ financing operations through Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), Banco Ambrosiano (the Vatican: see the preceding report), Bahrain International Bank (associated with the deceased – as of 26th December 2001 – Osama Bin Laden), and Bank Menatep, the KGB entity previously headed by the disgraced and then imprisoned covert Soviet KGB operative and oligarch and former minor Gorbachëv-era Minister, Mikhail Khodorkovsky.

The Clearstream data of which this service has been aware for several years contain accurate information, indicating that allegations by the Sarkozy entourage that the spreadsheets that have been in circulation for the past several years are forgeries, are false. M. Sarkozy was reported in February 2007 and earlier to have received corrupt funds from Zug-based Marc Rich, a.k.a. Hans Brand, the long-range DVD operative and corrupt financier who was notoriously ‘pardoned’ by President Clinton during his last hours in office (see above). The man who is now President of France was also alleged in 2007 to have received funds from Russian-Israeli mafiya accounts of Bank Menatep. However the ‘surfacing’ of this OLD intelligence is obviously suspect.

WHAT PRESIDENT BUSH JR. WAS REALLY UP TO IN BAGHDAD: TRYING TO STEAL MONEY
On Saturday 13th December, Bush Jr. appeared in Baghdad where, on 16th December 2008, he narrowly escaped being hit on the head by what have become the most famous footwear items in history – thrown by Muntadhar al-Zaidi, the courageous Iraqi TV journalist working for al-Baghdadia satellite TV station, who followed and reported on the US Apache helicopters’ trails of death and destruction, and has been a relentless exposer of the gross, Nazi-style abominations and atrocities committed by the US forces in Iraq. Throwing one’s shoe at a person is the ultimate insult in the Arab world and also anywhere in Europe from Austria eastwards.

The first airborne shoe was accompanied by the following pertinent imprecation:

‘This is the farewell kiss, you dog’.

At least, that is what was widely reported. Less widely reported was what the journalist shouted to accompany the arrival of the second airborne shoe:

‘This is from the widows, the orphans and those who were killed in Iraq’.

As the Iraqi and Arab satellite stations broadcast this expression of pent-up fury and outrage at the brutality of the invading and occupying US forces, and of the CIA’s cadres with their hideous ‘Black’ abominations from Abu Ghraib onwards, regional TV stations and media websites were inundated with messages of adulation. The Guardian summarised the content of these messages thus:

‘Bush is a mass murderer and a war criminal who sneaked into Baghdad. He killed a million Iraqis. He burned the country down’.

Ostensibly, ‘the Dog’ was in Baghdad to sign off on the negotiated troop withdrawal arrangements, this being presumably Bush II’s final Iraq-related act as the most despised US President in history. But in actual fact, what Mr Bush was really more interested in, was stealing money.

• Two impeccable sources informed us on 16th December 2008 that he attempted to steal a large sum while in Iraq, only to be informed that the funds had been placed beyond his reach, under the protection of the World Court.

So the workings of the devious mind of this cunning little criminal dog-snake had been anticipated in advance, given that it would have been known that he was to make a flying visit to Baghdad over the weekend of 13th-14th December 2008 (even though the visit was ‘secret’). Mr Bush’s failure to steal money from the Central Bank of Iraq or indeed from any other component of the Iraqi financial infrastructure may account for the man’s ‘crushed’ appearance during subsequent TV broadcasts.

NO DENIAL OF THE MORGAN STANLEY TERRORISM FINANCING CENTER
While all this was developing, our report exposing the office suite within Morgan Stanley known from the relevant investigation in 2007 to be the Terrorism Financing Center specialising in the financing of the projection by the corrupt revolutionary United States of secret ‘Black Ops’ global terrorism operations headed by the US-created hydra called Al-Qaeda, had already been in the public domain for OVER THREE WEEKS. This exposure, which stemmed from our knowledge that the Provost Marshal was refused entry to this office suite with his accompanying personnel when he attended Morgan Stanley’s premises in October 2007, and from the findings of the subsequent official but unreported investigation, prompted the following response:

• NO RESPONSE AT ALL:
From any of the CIA-controlled disinformation or confusion-mongering websites, which obviously, being CIA-backed outlets, could not ‘touch it’, with one exception. It was suggested by an observer that the breaking of this information was worthy of a Pullitzer Prize (although simple Brits don’t really understand what on earth that is). The comment was accompanied by the add-on that ‘it had better be true, or one wouldn’t want to be in Story’s shoes’. Well, Story remains, at least as of the time of writing, in the new shoes that he bought in order to be properly dressed for his fourth daughter’s candle-lit wedding in our 11th century parish church on 13th December 2008.

• NO REFUTATION WHATSOEVER from any Fourth or Fifth estate source. Manifestly, if the report were untrue (which is not the case!), it would have been necessary at some stage to discredit it. But this has not happened, because the report is true, as you would expect.

Now it is a fact that this information, which had been known for over a year by our sources, who had previously been precluded from revealing it to us, was made available for a very good reason. Even though, as indicated above, the report has so far been confined to this website, that doesn’t matter because of the website’s immense global coverage. The reality is that this information is out in the public domain, so that governments worldwide have picked it up and know the truth of the matter (if it had been withheld from them by their penetrated intelligence services).

AL-QAEDA WILL HAVE TO BE CLOSED DOWN: BY BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
It can therefore only be a matter of time before Al-Qaeda is wound up.

• And who do you suppose has been positioned to achieve just that outcome?

• Why, Barack Hussein Obama, of course. Let us explain, in case this is not clear.

Treating the 25 years of the Reagan-Bush-Clinton ascendancy as the Thesis (Clinton has all along ‘worked for’ Bush Sr., but carries the opposite (dialectical) political label), we are now presented with the purported Antithesis under President Barack Obama.

• Although the Elite Power Continuum remains in place, the team members have been switched.

The socialist-internationalist British Prime Minister Gordon Brown pronounced on 14th December that Al-Qaeda was planning 20 separate terrorist attacks on civilian targets in the United Kingdom. However being also a blackmailable intelligence officer, Mr Brown knows perfectly well, or should know, that Al-Qaeda has been financed inter alia via the Morgan Stanley-based Terrorism Financing Center (our name for the abominable suite within that corrupt financial enterprise in Midtown New York City). It therefore follows that Brown may be a duplicitous deceiver who knows the truth but hasn’t got the guts to expose it, because he is being blackmailed, or is just plain ignorant due to compartmentalisation or because his handlers have been instructed to leave him in ignorance – which might be the sort of behaviour to be expected from the current Germanophile head of MI6.

As a result of the London ‘safety lock box’ raids conducted by 300 armed Metropolitan Police officers on 2nd June 2008, details of certain secret offshore bank accounts with Henry Ansbacher, British Virgin Islands, a preferred DVD money-laundering and bribery payment recipient bank, were discovered. This fact places a questionmark over the futures of certain key UK figures.

Another possible explanation for Brown’s remarks would be that they represented a feeble attempt to discredit our report: evidently, Mr Story’s exposure of the Morgan Stanley Terrorism Financing Center ‘cannot be true, because why would Morgan Stanley be interested in mounting 20 attacks against America’s supposedly closest ally’?

Anyone who thinks like this hasn’t begun to grasp:

(a) That the so-called ‘Special Relationship’ has been degraded and corroded by the wayward and relentlessly evil operations of the DVD segment of the US Intelligence Power; and:

(b) That the deviousness of the evil DOUBLE-MINDEDNESS of these people is infinite: they have NO WAY of combating the truth other than with more lies. IF YOU HAVEN’T UNDERSTOOD THE DOUBLE-MINDEDNESS DIMENSION BY NOW, YOU’LL NEVER UNDERSTAND ANYTHING.

Anyway, our revelation of the existence of the Morgan Stanley Terrorism Financing Center also represented yet another HORRIBLE BOMB EXPLOSION in the faces of the recalcitrant criminalist revolutionary perpetrators, since, by definition, it signalled not only that Al-Qaeda would have to be wound up, but, even more to the point in our context, that:

• The United States’ reprobate and wholly inexcusable covert ‘Black Ops’ financing of terrorism worldwide through Morgan Stanley and possibly other criminalist US institutions, will have to be wound up, as well. This follows because now that this report has of course remained unchallenged, the US Government has come under pressure, and will remain under intensified pressure, from governments, other observers and this service, to close down these revolutionary abominations, and to make haste in doing so. The ‘discontinuity’ afforded by the arrival of a properly elected and validated (by the US Electoral College) new Administration (albeit the controlled Antithesis to the preceding Thesis), especially a man of Mr Obama’s ethnic background, provides the deliberately prearranged DIALECTICAL opportunity to achieve this desirable outcome.

We can leave our disgust and justifiable fury at the hideous behaviour of the revolutionary US Government and its ruthless Intelligence Power as a promoter and projecter of terrorism, to later.

FOLLOWING OUR MULTIPLE EXPOSURES, DVD NOW SAID TO BE ‘BITTERLY DIVIDED’
Recalling that the Intelligence Power controls the US Government, not the other way round, it can be seen that the Bush-directed neocon (Trotskyite/DVD) intelligence community’s ‘Faction A’ which has been surreptitiously promoting the World Revolution and causing mayhem around the world, is being superseded by an ‘opposing’ faction, which will now set about dismantling the worst features of the run-away revolutionary madness sponsored by Faction A.

The genies that the outgoing team’s evil people have let out of the bottle include the DELIBERATE ongoing CIA-originated radicalisation and mindless indoctrination of Pakistani youth, so that a huge swathe of that country, like Afghanistan, is in the hands of armed gangs, as is the case for the same underlying reason in large areas of Africa.

Given that the routinely treacherous British Foreign Office has a team in Rawalpindi which recruits Pakistani immigrants to the United Kingdom (each agent is said to be required to fulfil his quota of 15 Pakistani immigrants per working day, on a bonus basis), it is self-evident that elements of the British Government structures, by importing Pakistanis into Britain en masse, are actively engaged in working with the (DVD) enemy to destabilise the United Kingdom which they are supposed to be serving. This is among many such grotesque revolutionary aberrations that have come to light through recent forensic research by analysts whose brains have not yet been ‘washed’.

Such operations were originally masterminded by the Bush-linked DVD-servicing component of the corrupted US Intelligence Power, but have now all reached the ‘maximum chaos’ level and are in growing jeopardy, as we understand that, following our exposures (specifically), the Dachau-based DVD, related to Bush Sr.’s hellish activities, is now bitterly divided.

More and more of the DVD’s filthy operations are being exposed, including the transfer of little girls along with drugs and nuclear components by submarine, for unloading at a northern German port (where little girls have been photographed by clandestine operatives, being disgorged from one of the submarines in question).

DVD’S BRUSSELS BLACKMAIL UNIT AIMED AT EUROPEAN COMMISSIONERS: DG1-X
We now report a further dimension of DVD’s operations, which hopefully will accentuate additional splits in the ranks of German intelligence. The Brussels-located component of this shadowy ‘Black’ Nazi strategic deception continuum agency, labelled DG1-X, is hereby exposed. DG1-X specialises solely in compromising European Commissioners, which it divides into the following categories:

• European Commissioners susceptible to paedophile compromise for blackmail purposes; Subsidiary question: Do they prefer little boys or little girls? Refer back to our exposé of the President of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso, in the DVD exposure report published in October 2008.

• European Commissioners susceptible to the standard honey-trap operation for blackmail purposes (provision of women).

• European Commissioners susceptible to the standard bribery/financial compromise operation for blackmail purposes (money-trap operations).

As we all know, other agencies ‘do this stuff’, as you will have read elsewhere recently on this website; and not all of them are ‘Black’. But the significance of this DVD unit is that it operates in Brussels specifically to target European Commissioners, who of course are away from home when they are stuck in the distinctly gloomy Belgian capital.

• The reason for the existence of DG1-X in Brussels is that the modelling of the European Union as a COLLECTIVE, in order to obscure the underlying intention for it to be controlled by Germany and to represent, ultimately, ‘Greater Germany’, as per the blueprint originally specified in ‘Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft’ [1942, Berlin], necessitated the incorporation of an add-on mechanism for ensuring that European Commissioners could always be relied upon to do Germany’s bidding. DG1-X probably targets other EU personnel as well as Commissioners.

• FACT: When the Editor recited this information of late on the transatlantic telephone line, the connection was immediately severed. This always indicates that what is being said is accurate (routinely showing what fools the eavesdroppers are).

THE MADOFF HYDROGEN BOMB EXPLODES
The next nuclear explosion to disfigure the faces of the Workers of Darkness was the subsidiary Octopus Master Ponzi Scheme run by Bernard L. Madoff, who was arrested at about 8.30 am in his Manhattan apartment on 64th Street on 11th December 2008. In an extensive report dated the 20th December and entitled ‘Madoff Scheme Kept Rippling Outward, Crossing Borders’, The New York Times ploughed methodically through the office press cuttings file, characterising Madoff’s self-confessed giga-scam as ‘the first Global Ponzi Scheme in history’ – which is of course NOT TRUE, since George H. W. Bush Sr.’s Octopus operations represent a whole universe of exported Ponzi schemes. But the article, which covered more than two huge full pages in the newspaper, and was only concerned with the money ‘IN’ (see above), did an excellent job assembling details of Madoff’s domestic and international connections, which were almost 100% Jewish.

As we have seen, Bernard L Madoff was recruited by George W. Bush Sr. to run ‘his’ money. After the $14 trillion was placed into ‘lockdown’ during the week ending on 17th September 2008 (see above), Madoff’s firm started to encounter massive redemption demands.

Bearing in mind that the funds, once transferred abroad, for instance to London, could then be leveraged 40:1, the pressure faced by Madoff related not just to originally invested funds, but impinged upon much larger sums of money which could not be accessed because they had been routinely transferred out to offshore tax havens and to Israel and then onwards inter alia to the Southern Cone of Latin America – Paraguay, Uruguay, Argentina and Brazil – where many of the key dogs and rats are now congregating, to satisfy Bush Sr., who demanded his payoff and pound of flesh at the Jews’ expense. The Madoff takedown, in short, represented another George Bush Sr. operation to claw back the immense sums he lost at an earlier stage of the crisis for which he is responsible, inter alia via naked shorts, as reported by this service.

It can be seen, too, that the destruction of Madoff was a George Bush Sr. ‘BCCI/ENRON takedown-type’ operation designed effectively to take down Israel itself – Mr Bush Sr.’s revenge against Alan Greenspan, his former technician, with whom, as our exposures gathered momentum, he had fallen out (new information). As noted, every cited victim of the Madoff implosion is Jewish.

The United States Court proceedings deal, and are likely to continue addressing, just the money originally invested (the money ‘IN’) – not the money leveraged off the base funds, which amounts to trillions and which would appear, according to our own special sources (not secondary Internet sources) to have been channeled extensively THROUGH Israel, as has been stated, en route to South America, for the benefit of the Bushrats congregating there.

In other words, the Bushrats are not only fighting each other and their double-crossed Jewish associates inside the sack, but have essentially burned the sack (their boats) as well. The colossal transfers to Israel for onward transmission to the Southern Cone, were monitored in real time.

MADOFF RECRUITED BY, AND ‘WORKED FOR’, BUSH/CIA PONZI CRIME APPARAT
Madoff’s operations could not have been possible without, and were assisted by, insider traders associated with the Octopus operations linked to the Bush-Clinton Crime nexus. The New York Times’ article showed clearly how the scam operated, with a key mechanism being Mr Madoff’s success in hitching other, subsidiary Ponzi Scheme investment scamming operations – such as Ascot Partners (led by J Ezra Merkin), Fairfield Greenwich Group (headed by Walter M. Noel and Jeffrey Tucker, who has said that the firm worked with Madoff for 20 years), Tremont Group, and Maxam Capital Management, which enjoyed steady annual profits averaging 8%-12% and which directed a constant stream of new investors into Madoff’s clutches.

Since we now know that Madoff ‘worked for’ Bush Sr. in his later years, the leveraged proceeds from the inflowing funds that were multiplied and consistently maximised, were in the main kept abroad, while the entities and individuals listed below were paid from new incoming funds placed by new investors or by existing investors who increased their investments, with the actual Ponzi scheme related essentially to the principal monies invested, only. So gargantuan was the greed associated with this operation, that the externally generated funds were retained offshore (they could hardly be repatriated without attracting attention and without courting mandatory IRS tax evasion investigations), while the ‘IN’ money was repaid, or returns on it were paid, from new ‘IN’ money. The ‘OUT’ money was effectively an entirely separate operation.

Of course the ‘returns’ paid to investors did not reflect actual investment outturns, but rather rigged numbers falsified to enable the ‘managers’ to deliver the Ponzi-style returns expected.

In other words, there were two parallel master operations: the use of the base funds for external (40:1) leveraging, hypothecation, high-yield investment programmes and the like, with the created proceeds stashed offshore, as usual, untaxed and off-balance sheet; and the Ponzi scheme and its subsidiary Ponzi Schemes revealed in the existing Court documents, whereby earlier investors were repaid and interest was paid with funds provided by later investors. The hidden operation, concerning which Mr Madoff was reported by his elder son to be ‘cryptic’, was the Bush-related sink-hole. The Court documents imply that Madoff ‘kept several sets of books’.

We speculate that Madoff succumbed to recruitment by George Bush Sr. because he calculated that the massive hypothecated fiat money accruals generated by participating in the Bush-related off-balance sheet transnational fraudulent finance operations could be tapped so as to perpetuate his ‘on-the-books’ Ponzi Scheme activities, which he had been running long before George Bush Sr. operatives recruited him. However when Bush Sr. suddenly (we are informed) made demands consistent with a Bush ‘BCCI/ENRON takedown’ decision to ransack Madoff’s operations, to rake out all the money, to destroy his Jewish participants and inflict massive harm on the State of Israel, this means of supporting the increasingly vulnerable Ponzi Scheme ceased to be available.

Separately, we have repeatedly pointed out in these reports that all get-rich-quick ‘humanitarian’ and ‘prosperity’ programs which may have enticed participants to ignore the Prudent Man Rule with promises of mouth-watering returns, represented traps for the unwary. The original Charles Ponzi story has been posted several times with these reports, and is reposted below (3).

‘MADOFF TAKEDOWN’: A VAST SMOKESCREEN ‘PROTECTING’ THE GIGA-CROOKS
Before considering some of the Court documents associated with the Madoff ‘takedown’ operation, the matter must be placed firmly in the much broader context of the Bush-Clinton-CIA/DVD Criminal Cadres’ ruthless ransacking operations to steal as much of other people’s coveted possessions and wealth by reprobate means as possible, in order to sustain the criminalist community’s status as arbiters of both the future of humanity and of the mad World Revolution to reorder human affairs in accordance with their own sick preferences. And when we examine the clues left by the Madoff implosion operation, it becomes perfectly clear that this is an integral component of the offensive against humanity directed by the most ruthless network of gangsters to have been sicked up by the human race. The clues are quite specific, too.

According to our Palm Beach correspondent, desperate Jewish householders have been trying to sell their Christmas/holiday presents to raise cash, as their liquidity has been reduced effectively to zero. Others have been despeartely engaged in short-selling of their homes, only to find that the bankers they deal with, don’t want to know. Many people in Palm Beach, our informant says, have been literally ‘wiped out’. And the perpetrators of this ‘takedown’ have STOLEN both the money ‘IN’ and as indicated above, the much more prolific money ‘OUT’, in accordance with THE STANDARD PATTERN employed by the giga-crooks since at least the ‘classic’ CIA takedown of BCCI.

Other instances of the application of this technique, involving the hollowing-out of the target, to be followed by the deliberate, preplanned triggering of its collapse after all the ‘free money’ has been raked out, can indeed be seen to include ENRON, Iceland, even Ireland (if you look closely at the structure of that country’s balance-of-payments), and now the Madoff enterprises.

Looking at ‘Madoff’ in this broader perspective, we can see with ease that Bernard L. Madoff is just the shill: there is always a shill. He ‘had it good’ for years: now it’s his turn to take the full rap. If he winds up in jail for the rest of his life, what is that to the big criminals behind the curtain? If several people get killed, as happened with the takedown of Enron, what is that to the giga-crooks? If the people of Iceland starve and shiver in the cold, who cares, given that the country’s entire financial system has long since been ransacked and hollowed out?

In addition, the Madoff Ponzi system ‘implosion’, which was directly linked to the consequences of the London ‘Safety Lock Box’ raids on 2nd June 2008 and the placement of the $14.0 trillion into what we have described as ‘lockdown’ on 12th September 2008, as sources of replacement funds effectively dried up from mid-September onwards (the London-based stolen and illicit collateral having been neutralised), serves the following purposes in the interests of the giga-crooks:

• A diversionary purpose: Everyone is looking directly at the Madoff case, becoming entangled and confused by the spaghetti junction of confusing sub-cases, litigation, Court documents, SEC, FINRA and SIPC investigations: which is JUST WHAT THE GIGA-U.S. CROOKS WANT. After all, they have got away with the BIG MONEY, they have hollowed out the Master Ponzi Scheme and all its subsidiary Ponzi operations, and they urgently need the benefit of the cover so helpfully now provided by the MADOFF SMOKESCREEN, for two reasons:

(1) To ensure that no-one looks BEYOND the Court documents to grasp what has happened.

(2) To ensure that no-one looks into the criminal finance operations these people have been up to inside Citibank. In this connection, we interrupt this sequence with a reference to some comments attributed to Sir Win Bischoff, the Chairman of Citigroup, during a New Year’s Day broadcast on the BBC’s domestic Radio 4 Today Programme.

Asked the usual knee-jerk BBC question: ‘Who is really to blame for the crisis?’ (this question is asked repeatedly because none of these journalists can get it into their heads that this is 100% about ORGANISED FINANCIAL FRAUD AND NOTHING ELSE), Sir Win responded as follows:

‘My view is that they [bankers] are partly to blame. There are people who feel remorse about this: there’s no doubt about it. Do they all? I don’t know…. It is very important for banks not to deny that they carry some of the can, whether that’s 50 cents on the dollar, that is their responsibility, or 60 or 40’. Now remember that Sir Win is CHAIRMAN OF THIS HUGE BANK. WHAT DOES THIS IMPLY?

• A possible insider control purpose: When we examine the Court papers (the earliest filed Court documents were assembled from the US Court by the Editor), we discover that CONTROL OF THE EXPOSURES MAY BE CONTAINED ‘within the system’. There are several clues to this possibility:

(A) Court Document #2 [Securities and Exchange Commission COMPLAINT vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791 (LLS): Appointment of Receiver, Lee Richards, of Richards Kibbe & Orbe LLP ‘over all the assets and accounts of defendant Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“BMIS”) outside of the United States, to take control forthwith over BMIS’s dealings and transactions with any non-United States entity or counterparty, with full access to BMIS’s books and records necessary or useful to him in the exercise of his powers over BMIS’s foreign business or transactions’ signed by United States District Judge Louis L. Stanton at 6.42pm on 12th December 2008: plus:

Court Document #3: Securities and Exchange Commission ORDER vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791 (LLS) ECF Case: Order to show cause, Temporary Restraining Order and Order Freezing Assets and Granting Other Relief; Order consented to by defendants and therefore signed off by United States District Judge Louis L. Stanton at 4:51pm on 13th December 2008.

Court Document #2 appoints LEE RICHARDS, of Richards Knibbe & Orbe LLP, as ‘receiver over all the assets and accounts of the defendant Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“BMIS”) outside of the United States’, while Court Document #3 appoints LEE RICHARDS, of Richards Knibbe & Orbe LLP ‘as receiver for the Defendants’ assets, including, without limitation, Madoff Securities International Ltd. (“Madoff International”) and Madoff Ltd.’: the Defendants being Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Securities LLC.

LEE S. RICHARDS III is a founding partner of Richards Knibbe & Orbe LLP. His stated specialities, according to the firm’s website, are ‘white collar criminal defense, securities enforcement defense, regulatory proceedings, internal investigations and complex litigations’.

‘He has extensive trial experience and he regularly represents investment banks, hedge funds, public companies, investment advisers, corporate officers and directors, and other professionals in investigations and proceedings by the DOJ, SEC, FINRA, and other governmental entities and SROs. He also represents companies and senior executives in commercial litigations, class action and derivative cases, and arbitrations relating to a variety of disputes’.

Under the lead-in ‘Some notable representations include’, Mr Richards’ website lists the following:

‘Representation of several major New York investment banks in a variety of DOJ, SEC and FINRA investigations…

… including the representation of one of the major investment banks which advised ENRON’.

From this information it can be stated without fear of contradiction that Mr Lee Richards III is very knowledgeable in respect of how Enron- and Madoff-type Ponzi operations are structured.

(b) Under the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (SIPA, 15 U.S.C. Sec 78aaa et seq.), the SEC and also the Securities Investor Protection Corporation requested (Civ. 08-10791) the US Court on 15th December 2008 to name Irving H. Picard [SEE BELOW] as Trustee, with the firm of Baker and Hostetler LLP appointed Counsel for the Trustee. This development will be referenced in greater detail when we examine the Court documents below, where we point out that:

Baker and Hostetler LLP has been established for 90 years with offices in Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Cosa Mesa, Denver, HOUSTON, Los Angeles, New York, Orlando, Washington DC, Brazil and Mexico. Having been ordered to be appointed Trustee under SIPA via the SEC and Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Irving J. Picard proceeded to JOIN the New York office of Baker & Hostetler LLP, per the firm’s Press Release, dated 22nd December 2008, headed: ‘Court-Appointed Trustee In Madoff Fraud Investigation Joins Baker Hostetler in New York’.

• WE REPEAT: Irving J. Picard was appointed Trustee, BAKER and Hostetler LLP were appointed Counsel to the Trustee: whereupon Irving J. Picard joins the firm of Counsel. IMAGINE!

On 3rd January 2009, The Times, London, reported that Martin Rosenman, President of Stuyvesant Fuel Service, a private New York-based fuel company, is suing Irving J. Picard, for the return of $10 million. The context of this suit revolves around that fact that Mr Picard’s first action was to obtain the Bankruptcy Court’s authority to transfer $28.1 million from the $200-$300 million said to be left in Madoff’s bank account(s), to cover the costs of the liquidation. But Mr Rosenman argued on 2nd January that Mr Picard had no right to these funds, pointing out that he (Mr Rosenman) transferred $10 million to Madoff just six days ahead of Mr Madoff’s arrest.

Specifically, Mr Rosenman argued that he spoke to Bernard L. Madoff on 3rd December 2008 about investing, and on 5th December he received details of an account into which the cash should be transferred. On 9th December, Martin Rosenman was informed by BMIS that Bernard L. Madoff had sold short $10 million in US Treasury bills on his behalf. Claiming that he had not authorised such a transfer, Mr Rosenman stated that he could find no record of any such transaction.

The lawsuit claims: ‘BMIS never transacted a trade of US Treasury bills on Rosenman’s behalf’. Mr Howard Kleinhendler, a partner in the firm of Wachtel & Masyr, representing Mr Rosenman, said that he suspected that at the time that Mr Rosenman invested his funds, Madoff knew that he was close to being exposed and caught, and was collecting cash in order to make a final distribution among family and friends. in addition to revealing Mr Picard’s action, this is just an example of the incredible legal tangle that is now building.

• 6th January 2009 Update: Irving J. Picard was reported by Bloomberg on 5th January to have identified $830 million in liquid assets in bank accounts associated with BMIS. Stephen Harbeck told the Congressional Committee that these assets ‘may be’ subject to recovery for clients of Madoff’s firm, according to Bloomberg, without explaining the use here of imprecise language.

In a separate Bloomberg report, the Assistant US Attorney, Marc Litt, whose signature appears on the Court documents obtained by the Editor of this service, was stated to have asked the Federal Judge to imprison Mr Madoff, as he awaits trial, arguing that Mr Madoff’s $10 million bail (and, one would presume, his properties pledged to the US Government) should now be revoked and the funds forfeited because he transferred $1.0 million of valuables, in violation of the asset freeze order. The report stated that Madoff disposed of five items, including ‘very valuable jewelry’, Mr Litt informed the Magistrate Judge, Ronald Ellis, on 5th January in the Manhattan Federal Court.

Some of the items were mailed by Madoff and his wife Ruth to third parties. Mr Litt stated that the transfer started on 29th December 2008, representing a ‘changed circumstance’, specified under Federal law, precipitating the necessity to alter the terms of Mr Madoff’s bail, since the transfer violated the freezing of his assets agreed to as confirmed in the Court papers we have examined.

Marc Litt explained that ‘the case against the defendant is strong, and it’s getting stronger’. The transfer represented ‘an obstruction of justice’.

(3) An examination by the Editor of the time-sequence of events which led to Bernard L. Madoff’s arrest reveals an extremely tight timeframe within which the ‘Madoff takedown operation’ was accomplished, suggesting at the very least that Attorneys, typists and other personnel would have to have worked all night on the necessary documentation.

Now knowledgeable US sources inform the Editor that this is not unusual. Nevertheless, the whole process looks TOO PAT TO HAVE BEEN SPONTANEOUS. Consider the following sequence, extracted from the Securities Fraud Count document submitted to the Court on 11th December by the FBI Special Agent, Thodore Cacioppi:

• First week of December 2008: Bernard L. Madoff informed ‘Senior Employee No. 2’ (one of his sons) that there had been requests from clients for approximately $7 billion in redemptions.

• About 9th December 2007: Madoff informed ‘Senior Employee No.1’ (one of his sons) that he wanted to pay bonuses to employees in December, rather than February (as was usual).

• On 10th December 2008, the ‘Senior Employees’ ‘visited Madoff at the offices of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC to discuss the situation further… At that time, Madoff informed the Senior Employees that he had recently made profits through business operations, and that now was a good time to distribute…’.

‘When the Senior Employees challenged his explanation, Mr Madoff said that he did not want to talk to them at the office, and arranged a meeting at Mr Madoff’s apartment in Manhattan. According to Senior Employee No. 2, Madoff stated in substance, that ‘”he wasn’t sure he would be able to hold it together” if they continued to discuss the matter at the office’.

• ‘Confession’ of Madoff to his two sons on 10th December: ‘His investment advisory business was a fraud… he was “finished”… it was “basically a giant Ponzi scheme”… the business was insolvent, and [that] it had been for years… the losses from this fraud [were] at least $50 billion’

• On 11th December, the FBI Special Agent with another FBI agent entered Madoff’s Manhattan apartment after presenting themselves, and at Madoff’s invitation. ‘He acknowledged knowing why we were there. After I [the FBI Special Agent] stated “we’re here to find out if there’s an innocent explanation”, Madoff stated, “There is no innocent explanation”‘.

The FBI Special Agent’s Charge document was dated the same day, 11th December 2008, and was signed off by The Hon. Douglas F. Eaton, United States Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of New York. Now the Editor is prepared to acknowledge that the US ‘system’ is capable of great efficiency: but given the complexity of the documents that the Editor was able to obtain direct from the Court during his pre-Christmas visit to New York, and even conceding that the documents may in some instances have been elaborated from boiler-plate templates, the whole process seems to the Editor of this service to have been MUCH TOO PAT AND COMPACT TO BE REASSURING.

That, in turn, supports the analysis that the ‘Madoff takedown’ falls into the BCCI, Enron, Iceland imposion category, the model procedure being that when the time comes for all the accessible cash to be raked out, the carcase of the target is DELIBERATELY COLLAPSED, to facilitate this.

• Depending on the circumstances, this may have to be done in a frightful hurry.

In this connection, we can also observe that Madoff told his sons that he had just $200-$300 million of cash left. THE REST OF THE FUNDS HAD BEEN MISAPPROPRIATED AND STOLEN. Hence he left the ‘collapsing operation’ until the remaining several hundred million was ‘available’ for the illegal distribution that he was contemplating: a step too far for his sons, who, if they had agreed to such a distribution, would have laid themselves open to immediate arrest, along with their father. Whether they will be arrested later, remains to be seen, and depends on how much they knew.

Finally, the relevance of the foregoing open information concerning the SEC-appointed Trustee and the SIPC-appointed Trustee who immediately joins the firm of Counsel, should be reviewed.

MADOFF ‘CHANGES THE SUBJECT’, WHILE LAW ENFORCEMENT SITS ON ITS HANDS
In summary, Madoff ‘changes the subject’: No-one is supposed to be looking inside Citibank, no-one is supposed to be going on about the Settlements, no-one is supposed to be talking about the stolen/diverted $14.0 trillion of LOAN MONEY THAT BELONGS TO THE QUEEN, TO PRINCE AL-AWEED AND THE CHINESE PARTIES, no-one is supposed to care a hoot about the plight of the 320,000 long-suffering pillaged ‘package’ victims, and no-one is supposed to be in charge of his or her brains any longer, because ‘IT ALL DEPENDS ON THE OUTCOME OF MADOFF’.

• A lovely, open-ended laywer-enriching spaghetti junction of intertwined litigation operating at cross-purposes with no conceivable resolution because the innumerable decisions will all come to rely on each other, or will be impeded by the innumerable ongoing investigations which will take years to resolve, if any can ever be resolved. The perfect contrived cover for the giga-crooks.

MEANWHILE:

• THE GIGA-CRIMINALS HAVE STOLEN THE BIG MONEY. BUSH SR. HAS PROBABLY BY NOW GOT HIS TRILLIONS ‘BACK’, even though they were of course STOLEN IN THE FIRST PLACE.

• You are perfectly entitled to ask yet again, but with much greater determination than ever:

EXACTLY WHAT HAS U.S. LAW ENFORCEMENT BEEN DOING ALL THIS TIME, WHILE WE AND OTHERS, AT GREAT RISK TO OUR OWN PERSONAL SAFETY, HAVE BEEN EXPOSING THIS BOTTOMLESS AND REEKING CESSPIT OF OPEN-ENDED U.S.-PRIMED FINANCIAL CRIMINALITY?

• Law enforcement, Gold Badges and others need to get off their butts, instead of feathering their own nests like the rest of these people, and MI6/Interpol need to redouble their own operations in order to ensure that the requirements of the owners of the LOAN funds are fulfilled. Further failure to deliver, will CERTAINLY condemn the world to an absolutely horrendous future: IN 2009.

• Our forecasts have been accurate to date: SO START PAYING PROPER ATTENTION and earn some respect, instead of displaying your individual and collective feebleness and impotence.

• It is INSUFFERABLE for you people to be allowing these criminal operatives to get away with their crimes, if this is what is happening, and to obfuscate the audit trails with the connivance of deeply-placed Accessories to the Fact of this massive operation to hijack the whole world.

• Nor can it be tolerated that the criminalist cadres may indeed be relying upon the potential for the Madoff events to OBFUSCATE matters to their advantage, and to impede the Settlements and the grossly overdue implementation of the G-7-Approved on-the-books Capital Markets revenue-producing and tax-generating SOLUTION TO THE WHOLE WORLD’S FINANCIAL PROBLEMS which the US-based Washington area operatives have deliberately and malevolently SABOTAGED.

• So get off your butts and belatedly start DOING YOUR JOB.

• Or, as we asked earlier, are you ALL co-conspirators? THAT’S THE IMPRESSION YOU GIVE.

• WE ALL WANT RESULTS, NOT LIES, BLUFFS, DIVERSIONS AND SUBTERFUGES.

THE PRIMARY ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS FROM THE MADOFF COURT FILES
Addressing exclusively the money ‘IN’ dimension, the Editor has obtained the complete file (Case Numbers: 08 MAG 2735, AND 08 Civ. 10791), as of 21st December, held at the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on the Madoff case (4), which represents the biggest explosion since our exposure of the Morgan Stanley Terrorism Financing Center, from which we report as follows, bearing in mind the context outlined above:

• Madoff’s ‘agreed bail package’ specified on the Appearance Bond dated 11th December 2008 bound Madoff to pay the United States $10.0 million (personal recognizance bond) secured by the Defendant’s Manhattan Apartment (valued at approximately $7.0 million) and to be co-signed by four financially responsible persons including his wife; and limited his travel to the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York and Connecticut, requiring him to surrender his travel documents. The Appearance Bond was signed by Bernard L. Madoff and by his wife, Ruth Madoff, and Peter Madoff, as surety.

• On 17th December 2008 a Court Agreement to Forfeit Property was signed by Bernard Madoff and Ruth Madoff. The property forfeited pending the outcome of the case consists of the Manhattan apartment on 64th Street,, Madoff’s Palm Beach residence, and his third US residence in Montauk, on the northeast fork of Long Island.

• The Complaint filed on 11th December 2008 by FBI Special Agent Theodore Cacioppi, in which Bernard L. Madoff is accused of violation of 15 U.S.C. sections 78j(b), 78ff; 17 C.F.R. section 240, 10b-5, contains inter alia the following:

COUNT ONE [Securities fraud]
1. … Bernard L. MADOFF, the defendant, unlawfully, willfully and knowingly, by the use of the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce and of the mails, directly and indirectly, in connection with the purchase and sale of securities, would and did use and employ [sundry] manipulative and deceptive devices and contrivances in violation of Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 240.10b-5, by:

(a) employing devices, schemes, and artifices to defraud;

(b) making [many] untrue statements of material facts and omitting to state material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, and:

(c) engaging in acts, practices, and courses of business which operated and would operate as a fraud and deceit upon persons, to wit, MADOFF deceived investors by operating a securities business in which he traded and lost investor money, and then paid certain investors purported returns on investment with the principal received from other, different investors, which resulted in losses of approximately billions of dollars. (…)

3. I have reviewed the publicly available website of a securities broker dealer named Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, from which I have learned the following:

(a) BERNARD L. MADOFF, defendant, is founder of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC;

(b) Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC is a securities broker dealer with its principal office in New York, New York;

(c) Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC “is a leading international market maker. The firm has been providing quality executions for broker-dealers, banks and financial institutions since its inception in 1960”;

(d) “[w]ith more than $700 million in firm capital, Madoff currently ranks among the top 1% of US Securities firms;

(e) BERNARD L. MADOFF, the defendant, is a former Chairman of the Board of Directors of the NASDAQ stock market; and:

(f) “Clients know that Bernard Madoff has a personal interest in maintaining an unblemished record of value, fair-dealing, and high ethical standards that has always been the firm’s hallmark”.

4. I have interviewed two senior employees of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“Senior Employee No. 1”, and “Senior Employee No. 2”, collectively the “Senior Employees”).

The Senior Employees informed me, in substance, of the following:

(a). The Senior Employees are employed by Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, in a proprietary trading and market making capacity. According to the Senior Employees, BERNARD L. MADOFF, the defendant, conducts certain investment advisory business for clients that is separate from the firm’s proprietary trading and market making activities.

According to the Senior Employees, MADOFF ran his investment adviser business from a separate floor in the New York offices of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. According to Senior Employee No. 1, MADOFF kept the financial statements for the firm under lock and key, and stated that MADOFF was “cryptic” about the firm’s investment advisory business.

(b). In or about the first week of December 2008, BERNARD L. MADOFF, the defendant, told Senior Employee No. 2 that there had been requests from [various] clients for approximately $7.0 billion in redemptions, that he was struggling to obtain the liquidity necessary to meet these obligations, but that he thought that he would be able to do so.

According to the Senior Employees, they had previously understood that the investment advisory business had assets under management on the order of between approximately $8 and $15 billion. According to a Form ADV filled by MADOFF on behalf of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC with the SEC on or about January 7, 2008, MADOFF’s investment advisory business served between 11 and 25 clients and had a total of about $17.1 billion in assets under management.

(c). On or about December 9, 2008, MADOFF informed Senior Employee No. 1 that he wanted to pay bonuses to employees of the firm in December, which was earlier than the employee bonuses are usually paid. According to the Senior Employees, bonuses traditionally have been paid in February of each year. On or about December 10, 2008, the Senior Employees visited MADOFF at the offices of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC so as to discuss the situation further, particularly because MADOFF had appeared to the Senior Employees to have been under great stress in the prior weeks. At that time, Mr MADOFF informed the Senior Employees that he had recently made profits through business operations, and that now was a good time to distribute them. When the Senior Employees challenged his explanation, MADOFF said he did not want to talk to them at the office, and arranged a meeting at MADOFF’s apartment in Manhattan.

According to Senior Employee No. 2, MADOFF stated, in substance, that he “wasn’t sure he would be able to hold it together” if they continued to discuss the issue at the office.

(d). At MADOFF’s Manhattan apartment, MADOFF informed the Senior Employees, in substance, that his investment advisory business was a fraud. MADOFF stated that he was “finished”, that he [now] had “absolutely nothing”, that “it’s all just one big lie”, and that it was “basically a Ponzi scheme”. The Senior Employees understood MADOFF to be saying, in substance, that he had for years been paying returns to certain investors out of the principal received from other, different investors. MADOFF stated that the business was insolvent, and that it had been for years. Mr MADOFF also stated that he estimated the losses from this fraud to be at least approximately $50 billion. One of the Senior Employees has a personal account at Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC in which several million had been invested under the management of MADOFF.

(e). At MADOFF’s Manhattan apartment, MADOFF further informed the Senior Employees that, in approximately one week, he planned to surrender to authorities, but before he did that, he had approximately $200-$300 million left, and he planned to use that money to make payments to certain selected employees, family, and friends. (…)

5. On December 11, 2008, I spoke to BERNARD L. MADOFF, the defendant. After identifying myself, MADOFF invited me, and the FBI agent who accompanied me, into his apartment. He acknowledged knowing why we were there.

After I stated, “we’re here to find out if there’s an innocent explanation”, MADOFF stated, “There is no innocent explanation”. MADOFF stated, in substance, that he had personally traded and had lost money for institutional clients, and that it was all his fault. MADOFF further stated, in substance, that he “paid investors with money that wasn’t there”.

MADOFF stated that he was “broke” and “insolvent” and that he had decided that “it could not go on”, and that he expected to go to jail. MADOFF also stated that he had recently admitted what he had done to Senior Employees Nos. 1, 2 and 3.

WHEREFORE, deponent prays that BERNARD L. MADOFF, the defendant, be imprisoned, or bailed, as the case may be.

THEODORE CACIOPPI
Special Agent
Federal Bureau of Investigation

Sworn to before me this 11th day of December, 2008

[Signed] Honorable Douglas F. Eaton, United States Magistrate Judge,
Southern District of New York.

THE COMPLAINT BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Complaint, filed with the Court on 11th December 2008 (08 Civ. 10791) informed the Court in summary that:

1. The Commission brings this emergency action to halt ongoing fraudulent offerings of securities and investment advisory fraud by Bernard L. Madoff (“Madoff”) and Bernard L. Madoff Investment securities LLC (“BMIS”), a broker dealer and investment adviser registered with the Commission. From an indeterminate period through the present, Madoff and BMIS has committed fraud through the investment adviser activities of BMIS. Yesterday, Madoff admitted to one or more employees of BMIS that for many years he has been conducting a Ponzi-scheme through the investment adviser activities of BMIS and that BMIS has liabilities of approximately $50 billion.

Mr Madoff told these employees that he intends to distribute any remaining funds at BMIS to the employees and certain investors in the investment advisor business, such as family and friends. Such a distribution will be unfair and inequitable to other investors and creditors of BMIS.

2. Expedited relief is needed to halt the fraud and prevent the Defendants from unfairly distributing the remaining assets in an unfair and inequitable manner to employees, friends and relatives, at the expense of other customers.

3. To halt the ongoing fraud, maintain the status quo and preserve any assets for injured investors, the Commission seeks emergency relief, including temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions, and an order:

(i) imposing asset freezes against the Defendants;

(ii) appointing a receiver over BMIS;

(iii) allowing expedited discovery and preventing the destruction of documents; and:

(iv) requiring the Defendants to provide verified accountings.

The Commission also seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, plus prejudgment interest and civil monetary penalties against all of the Defendants.

On 12th December 2008, the SEC asked the Court to issue ‘a temporary restraining Order and an Order freezing assets and granting other relief’ (08 Civ. 10791 (LLS) ECF Case: to which, in a Note, the SEC stated that the Defendants had consented) directing that:

‘pending a final disposition of this action, Defendants, and each of their financial and brokerage institutions, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and those persons in active concert or in participation with either of them who receive actual notice of such Order by means of personal service, facsimile service, telephonic notice, notice by e-mail, or otherwise, and each of them, hold and retain within their control, and otherwise prevent, any withdrawal, transfer, pledge, [offsetting or] encumbrance, assignment, dissipation, concealment or other disposal of any assets, funds, or other property (including money, real or personal property, securities, commodities, choses [sic] in action or other property of any kind whatsoever) of, held by, or under the direct or indirect control of, Defendants, whether held in the name of Madoff, BMIS, Madoff International or Madoff Ltd.., or for the direct or indirect beneficial interest of one or both of them, wherever situated, in whatever form such assets may presently exist and wherever located, and directing each of the financial or brokerage institutions, debtors and bailees, or any other person or entity holding such assets, funds or other property of the Defendants, to hold or retain within its control and prohibit the withdrawal, removal, transfer or other disposal of any such assets, funds or other properties, including, but not limited to:

(1) all assets, funds, or other properties held in the name of, held by, or under the control of one or both of the Defendants;

(2) all accounts in the name of Madoff or BMIS or on which Madoff is a signatory, including the accounts listed [herewith: the accounts were listed as Appendix A but are given here now]:

• JP Morgan Chase Account No: 000000140081703
Account in the Name of: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities

• JP Morgan Chase Account No: 000000066709466
Account in the Name of: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities

• The Bank of New York Mellon Account No: 890-0402-393
Account in the Name of: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities

• The Bank of New York Mellon Account No: 030-0951050
Account in the Name of: Bernard L. Madoff

• The Bank of New York Mellon Account No: 866-1126-621
Account in the Name of: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC

• NOTE: On 30th December, it emerged that Irving J. Picard, the SIPC-appointed Trustee, had reached ‘an understanding’ with Bank of New York Mellon to have certain funds released.

MORE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON BANK ACCOUNTS COME TO LIGHT
But the US Bankruptcy Judge, Burton Lifland, indicated that the Court papers outlining the said ‘agreement’ were ‘very basic’, according to Bloomberg, and asked Picard’s lawyer, Richard Bernard, for more information on the accounts in question. Bernard told the Court that there are ‘more funds and accounts’, without being specific.

He added that Bank of New York Mellon was holding some funds back because it may have “set-off rights” on certain claims, adding that he was limited in what he could say in open Court because of the ongoing criminal investigations. Clause III of the Order requested of the Court by the SEC and SIPC against BMIS filed on 15th December 2008 and signed by US District Judge Louis L. Stanton at 4:08pm on that date, reads:

‘ORDERED that all persons and entities are notified that, subject to the other provisions of 11 U.S.C. section 362, the automatic stay provisions of 11 U.S.C. section 362(a) operate as a stay of:

… G. The set-off of any debt owing to the Defendant that arose before the commencement of this proceeding against any claim against the Defendant’.

Clause VIII elaborates: ‘ORDERED that the stays set forth above shall not apply to:

G. Any set-off or liquidating transaction undertaken pursuant to the rules or bylaws of any securities clearing agency registered under section 17A(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. section 78q-1(b), or by any person acting under instructions from and on behalf of such a securities clearing agency…’.

To illustrate again that the SEC has finally been galvanised in this case to be seen to be casting its net over EVERY PARTY involved with Mr Madoff, Paragraph III of the SEC’s Order to Show Cause, Temporary Restraining Order, and Order Freezing Assets and Granting Other Relief [dated 12th December 2008] stated [page 8 of the Court document]:

‘IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants show cause… why this Court should not also enter an Order enjoining them, and any person or entity acting at their direction or on their behalf, from destroying, altering, concealing or otherwise interfering with, the access of the [SEC] Plaintiff Commission to any and all documents, books and records, that are in the possession, custody or control of Defendants, and each of their partners, agents, employees, servants, accountants, financial or brokerage institutions, attorneys-in-fact, subsidiaries, affiliates, predecessors and successors and related entities that refer, reflect or relate to the allegations in the Complaint, including, without limitation, documents, books, and records referring, reflecting or relating to defendants’ finances or business operations, or the offer or sale of securities by Defendants and the use of proceeds therefrom’. ENDS.

The relevant Court-filed documents clearly and specifically identify all the possible categories of collaborators and participants, and all Madoff-related property wherever located, prohibiting the tampering with and destruction of documents and of course TEAR SHEETS, or any movement of funds, requiring the unravelling of all funds commingled between BMIS and Madoff’s personal account(s), so that anyone caught up in this maelstrom who disturbs the audit trail will fall within the Court’s sights for appropriate treatment.

Specifically, the Defendants were directed to ‘provide a verified accounting immediately’, against the background of the freezing of the assets of the Defendants, the appointment of Lee Richards, of Richards Kibbe & Orbe LLP as ‘Receiver for the Defendants’ assets including without limitation Madoff Securities International Ltd (“Madoff International”)’, the London platform from where the primary leveraging operations were run, ‘and Madoff Ltd’.

The SEC’s Order requesting the freezing of relevant accounts and other relief sought, as noted, prohibition of ‘the destruction, concealment, or alteration of documents by Defendants’. ‘It appears from the evidence presented that certain ill-gotten gains derived from the Defendants’ fraudulent conduct have been deposited into the accounts of BMIS and/or Mr Madoff’s personal accounts. Self-evidently, Madoff-linked accounts in London and on the Continent are clearly targeted by the language of the Court documents, but it remains to be seen whether this will result in transparency of whether, as may be expected, an opaque veil will be drawn over the international dimensions.

On 31st December 2008, it was reported that Pomerantz, a prominent law firm, was considering asking the US District Court for the Southern District of New York to publish the list that Madoff had been required to compile, detailing the precise whereabouts of the assets. This firm was reported to be seeking to sue hedge fund Ponzi operations that channelled money into the Madoff ‘money machine’. Bernard L. Madoff had been required by the US Court to draw up a detailed list of all his investments, assets, loans, lines of credit and accounts (should there be any beyond those already identified by the SEC in its documentation), and to furnish this information by close of business on New Year’s Eve (see below).

Bloomberg reported on 1st January 2009 that an SEC enforcement official, Andrew Calamari, had confirmed receipt of the list of assets required to have been delivered by Mr Madoff and BMIS by close of business on 31st December 2008, adding that the list will not be made public. The official said that the Court had not authorised the disclosure of the ‘domestic’ list: ‘The 18th December Court Order does not authorize public release of materials related to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s ongoing investigation’.

• Commenting on this point, Professor John Coffee of Columbia Law School told Bloomberg that the SEC may intend the data to be kept secret because ‘there is a danger that foreign regulators and foreign creditors may seek to seize that money if the names are made public’.

• This was the first hint that, in addition to the US domestic legal ‘spaghetti junction’ of conflicting litigation, the international dimension will magnify this legal quagmire by an order of magnitude.

Under the relevant Court order signed by Louis L. Stanton, US District Judge, the list had to include all assets held by Madoff’s operations for his “direct or indirect benefit”.

Madoff’s foreign operations, such as the London-based Ponzi scamming machine offices located off Berkeley Square, Mayfair, central London, were given until 26th January to compile and hand over their own lists. Exclusion of any information from such lists will incur severe consequences.

By the end of 2008, four related cases by aggrieved investors had already been filed since the Madoff ‘confession’, arrest and bail arrangements were publicised. The SEC is expected to take steps to repatriate assets held outside the United States. All cases lodged into this maelstrom will become entangled in the already complex demands of the SEC/SIPC/FINRA investigations.

On 3rd January 2009, Fred Longer, a lawyer representing Group Defined Pension Plan & Trust, a Jersey City, NJ-based investor, filed a lawsuit in the Manhattan Federal Court against the hedge fund operator Tremont Group Holdings [see list below] over Madoff-related losses. Also named was Tremont’s auditor, Ernst & Young LLP, with Longer claiming that the accounting firm missed warnings about the Ponzi scheme. This Complaint seeks class-action, or group, status.

It appears that losses disclosed by some clients, and in the public demain [see our list below] may have been inflated by purported gains shown in the clients’ accounts with Madoff. Thus, whereas Yeshiva University, New York, had valued its foldings with Madoff at $110 million, it stated on 30th December that its net investment was of the order of $14.5 million, before inflation by ‘fictitious profits’. So there may be large differences between ‘money ‘IN”, and totals ‘lost’.

EXPERT ADVANCE WARNINGS ‘DISREGARDED BY THE S.E.C.’
To add to the discomfort of the SEC and the entire Bush-corrupted Wall Street Establishment, it emerged before Christmas that Harry Markopolos, a derivatives expert who previously worked for Rampart Investment Management, a fund competing with the Madoff operations, had been warning the SEC for TEN YEARS prior to the Madoff exposures, that Bernard L. Madoff’s activities ‘stank to high heaven’. He spent ten years trying to induce the Securities and Exchange Commission to investigate Mr Madoff and all his works.

For instance, Markopolos had accused Madoff of using the names of UBS and Merrill Lynch to lend credibility to his Ponzi activities. This is a variant of our point that holders of ‘derived’ assets enjoy NO RECOURSE TO SOURCE OF FUNDS, with their ‘assets’ supported solely by the name(s) of the institution(s) marketing them (their values being, as a savvy Jewish friend of the Editor’s pointed out recently, ‘what somebody agrees to pay for them’).

The London Times reported on 19th December that:

‘According to the [Markopolos] documents, which were written in November 2005, Mr Madoff is alleged to have told potential investors that all his options trading business was channelled through UBS and Merrill Lynch’.

‘However, Mr Markopolos asserted: “The counterparty credit exposures for UBS and Merrill would be too large for these firms’ credit departments to approve. The SEC should ask Bernard Madoff for trade tickets showing he has traded OTC [over the counter] options thru these two firms”‘.

‘It is understood that neither UBS nor Merrill Lynch has any material exposure to Mr Madoff’s businesses and also that neither had had a sufficiently substantial relationship with Mr Madoff to have conducted these types of trades. Such a discrepancy raises serious questions about the truthfulness of Mr Madoff’s sales pitch to new investors, such as hedge funds, and whether Mr Madoff sought to exploit the longstanding reputations of UBS and Merrill Lynch [sic] to legitimise his own operations’.

On 22nd December, The Times, London, elaborated:

‘Harry Markopolos, a derivatives expert who once worked for a rival fund, spent ten years urging the SEC to investigate Mr Madoff. In numerous reports, including a 19-page document written in November 2005 entitled ‘The World’s Largest Hedge Fund is a Fraud’, Mr Markopolos picked apart the investment strategy of Mr Madoff’.

‘Some claims by Mr Markopolos were anecdotal – “I have spoken to the heads of various Wall Street equity derivative trading desks and every single one of the senior managers I spoke with told me that Bernie Madoff was a fraud” – but sizeable chunks of his accusations involve detailed analysis of Mr Madoff’s investment strategy. He questions the way that Bernard Madoff charged for commissions and alleges that Mr Madoff used the names of leading investment banks such as UBS and Merrill Lynch to lend credibility to his schemes’.

‘He also claims that the overall investment strategy of Mr Madoff would have been impossible to carry out. Mr Madoff sought to lure investors with the promise of 12% returns by buying blue-chip stocks and insuring against the possibility that their value would fall by selling derivatives – a process known as hedging. Mr Markopolos argues, however, that for Mr Madoff to have fulfilled such a strategy, he would have regularly done more business than the entire New York market in those securities’.

HEAVILY PROMOTED STAR WITNESS FAILS TO APPEAR: WAS HE THREATENED?
Unsurprisingly, Harry Markopolos was to be a star witness to be questioned on 5th January 2009 by the Financial Services Committee of the House of Representatives, where the Democrat Chairman of the panel, Barney Frank, was faced with having to steer a careful course between seeking to extract the truth from terrified SEC officials, and the known involvement of severely compromised members of the Legislative Branch of the United States Government.

• UPDATE: Bloomberg reported on 5th January that Harry Markopolos, the former Chief Investment Officer with Tampart Investment Management, Boston, cancelled his appearance before Congress, saying that he was ‘worn down’ and wanted more time to prepare his remarks, accoding to Barney Frank, Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. This development has to be added to the roster of UNSATISFACTORY DEVELOPMENTS related elsewhere in this report. The impression gained is that Mr Markopolos may have been THREATENED and ordered to amend his testimony, ‘or else’. If such tactics are being used, it shows that the rats have STILL not realised that WHETHER THEY LIKE IT OR NOT, EVERYTHING WILL BE EXPOSED.

CALENDAR OF OFFICIAL REGULATORY AND ENFORCEMENT FAILURES
The Christian Science Monitor obliged on 5th January with a handy summary of the ongoing ‘lapses’ of supervision and enforcement by the corrupted Securities and Exchange Commission, to wit:

• 1992: Madoff’s name comes up in an SEC probe of Florida accountants who
allegedly sold unregistered securities.

• 1999: SEC examiners review trading practices at Madoff’s investment advisory firm.

• 2001: The SEC’s Boston office receives information from securities industry executive Harry Markopolos raising questions about the steady stock market returns of Madoff’s firm.

• 2004: The SEC looks into whether Madoff’s firm engaged in improper trading practices.

• 2005: The SEC interviews Madoff and family members, finding no improper trading practices.

• 2005: An industry-based regulatory office finds no improper trading practices by Madoff’s firm.

• 2005: SEC investigators meet with Markopolos, who alleges that Madoff’s firm is “the world’s largest Ponzi scheme”: see details above.

• 2006: An SEC enforcement investigation finds that Madoff and one of his clients misled regulators. As a result, Madoff agrees to register as an investment adviser.

• 2007: The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) examines Madoff’s firm. No regulatory action results. It appears that this entity took its cue from the corrupted SEC [yet see above].

PARALLEL INTERVENTION OF THE SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION
United States District Judge Louis L. Stanton signed the Defendants’ consent to the total Order (only partially reported here) at 4.51pm on 12th December 2008. Additionally, under the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (SIPA, 15 U.S.C. Sec 78aaa et seq.), the SEC and also the Securities Investor Protection Corporation requested (Civ. 08-10791) the Court on the 15th December 2008 to agree that ‘customers of the Defendant, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, are in need of the protection afforded by the’ SIPA, and in particular than the Court should order:

‘that all persons and entities are stayed, enjoined and restrained from directly or indirectly removing, transferring, setting off, receiving, retaining, changing, selling, pledging, assigning or otherwise disposing of, withdrawing or interfering with any assets or property owned, controlled or in the possession of the Defendant, including but not limited to the books and the records of the Defendant, and customers’ securities and credit balances, except for the purpose of effecting possession and control of said property by the Trustee’ (who was named as Irving H. Picard), with the firm of Baker and Hostetler LLP appointed Counsel for the Trustee.

Baker and Hostetler LLP has been established for 90 years and has offices in Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Cosa Mesa, Denver, HOUSTON, Los Angeles, New York, Orlando, Washington DC, Brazil and Mexico. Having been ordered to be appointed Trustee under SIPA via the SEC and Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Irving J. Picard proceeded to JOIN the New York office of Baker & Hostetler LLP, per the firm’s Press Release, dated 22nd December 2008 headed: ‘Court-Appointed Trustee In Madoff Fraud Investigation Joins Baker Hostetler in New York’.

Thus no sooner had the court-appointed Trustee, Irving H, Picard, been approved, than he joined the firm appointed as Counsel for the Trustee – raising the obvious question in the minds of this and other observers as to whether we have just uncovered a posible prospective inside stitch-up, the intent of which might logically be to control the exposure of information which would link the Madoff Master-Ponzi scheme and its subsidiary Ponzi operations directly with the Bush Sr.-Clinton Fraudulent Finance Crime Carousel, as has already been signalled above. It is not stated here that this IS the case: what is stated here is solely that the question has arisen.

A Memorandum of Law supporting the application of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (all related documents labelled Civ. 08-10791), filed on 15th December, stated inter alia that:

‘A proceeding under SIPA is a liquidation proceeding. The Trustee has the same powers and title with respect to the broker-dealer and its property as a Trustee in bankruptcy, including the right to avoid preferences. SIPA does not attempt to make all customers whole [see above] and SIPC is not an insurer of customer accounts. SIPA establishes a plan of limited protection via the liquidation proceeding, in which SIPC’s role is carefully delineated’.

‘It contemplates that customers’ claims will be satisfied to the maximum extent possible from the assets already on hand with the member… SIPA was not intended for the protection of brokers and dealers. However, after a liquidation proceeding is commenced to protect a member’s customers, SIPA authorizes the Trustee to close out certain contractual commitments between the members and another broker-dealer. This authority was designed to avoid the so-called “domino effect”, namely, the chance that the demise of a member might precipitate the failure of one or more other broker-dealers’.

‘Under SIPA Sec 78eee(b)(1), the Court is required to issue a protective decree if the Court finds that any of the conditions specified in the legislation exists, each of which is ‘a clear manifestation of serious difficulties that create, at the very least, an unacceptably high risk of loss of customer property for which the Defendant is responsible and accountable’.

The application by SIPC concluded:

‘According to information provided by the Commission and FINRA [the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority], the Defendant is insolvent, is unable to meet its obligations as they mature, and is not in compliance with the requirements regarding financial responsibility under sections 15(c)(3) and 17(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. sections 78o(c)(3) and 78q(a) (2000), and [also] Commission Rules 15c3-1, 15C3-3 and 17a-3, 17 C.F.R. sections 240.15c3-1, section 240.15c3-3 and section 240.17a-3. Consequently, three of the conditions referred to in SIPA section 78eee(a)(3) and specified in SIPA section 78eee(b)(1) exist’.

‘Pursuant to SIPA section78eee(b)(1), if the defendant consents to the issuance of a protective decree, the Court “shall forthwith issue a protective decree”’.

On the same day, 15th December 2008, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC consented to the issuance of a protective decree by the Court, although whether this will in practice adequately serve the interests of the investors in the giga-Ponzi scheme, who were in many cases themselves operating subsidiary Ponzi schemes, remains to be seen. The obvious question in the mind of this investigator and others is: with the Court-appointed Trustee having joined the Court-appointed firm of Counsel, are we looking at a pre-prepared damage limitation operation carefully designed not to expose the corruption and to procure statutory remedies, but rather to cover up linkages which would provide further direct connections with the Bush-Clinton Fraudulent Finance Money Factory operations that have already been partially exposed by this service?

IF YOU THINK YOU’RE A VICTIM, THE FBI WOULD LIKE TO HEAR FROM YOU
On 18th December 2008, the FBI issued the following Press Release:

U.S. Department of Justice
Federal Bureau of Investigation

PRESS RELEASE
26 Federal Plaza
New York
NY 10278

For Immediate Release

December 18, 2008

U.S. v. Bernard L. Madoff
http://newyork.fbi.gov/pressrel/2008/nyfo121808.htm

If you believe that you have been a financial fraud victim in the above captioned matter, please provide the following information:

(1) Full name
(2) Mailing address
(3) Phone number
(4) COPIES of any documents that substantiate your loss (do not send original documents)

Please mail this information to:

FBI New York
ATTN: Victim Assistance Office
26 Federal Plaza
23rd Floor
New York, NY 10278

Madoff’s offices on Madison Avenue have been guarded 24 hours a day, partly to prevent attacks by irate scammed investors, with the office sealed since Bernard L. Madoff was arrested, while FBI, Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities Investor Protection Corporation and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority investigators conduct urgent forensic examinations of Mr Madoff’s multiple sets of books.

Because no information is yet available on the value of the leveraged and hypothecated ‘money OUT’ numbers, the focus, as noted above, has so far been (and may remain) on the ‘money IN’ losses attributed (as at the end of 2008) to investors and operators of sub-Ponzi schemes in the Madoff giga-Ponzi operation. Here is an interim list, based upon open data available at the end of 2008, of the affected parties, whose funds have been STOLEN, not lost:

INTERIM LIST OF ‘MONEY IN’ LOSERS ARISING FROM THE DELIBERATE COLLAPSING
OF THE MADOFF COMPONENT OF THE GLOBAL PONZI MONEY MACHINE*

*Note: Data extracted from open sources. Some data varies between source.

Abu Dhabi Investment Authority [at least $400 million]
Access International Advisors, René-Thierry Magon de La Villehuchet [$1,400 million]
Aozora Bank (Japanese bank) [$230 million]
Ascot Fund [Gabriel Capital, Ascot Partners] [$0.92 billion]
Ascot Partners [Gabriel Capital], hedge fund founded by L Ezra Merkin [$1,800 million]
AXA (French insurer) [$123 million]
Banco Santander, Optimal Investment Services, Geneva [$2,870 million-$3,100 million]
Bank Medici (Austrian Bank, believed bankrupted) [$2,100 million]
Banque Bénédict Hentsch & Cie [$47.5 million -$48.8 million]
BBVA (Spanish bank) [$369 million -$404 million]
Benbassat & Cie [$935 million]
BNP Paribas SA [initially $431-$478 million, later ‘billions of Euros of losses’]
Braman, Norman, former owner of the Philadelphia Eagles [$ unknown]
Bramdean Alternatives (Mrs Nicola Horlick) [9.5% of assets]
Caissse de Dépots et Consignations [$1.4 million]
Carl and Ruth Shapiro Family Foundation [see Carl Shapiro]
Carl Shapiro, former Chairman of Kay Windsor, Inc, apparel) [$545 million]
Chais Family Foundation [$ unknown]
Clal Insurance $0.8 million]
CNP Assurances [$4.1 million]
Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun [$3.5 million]
Crédit Mutuel [$124 million]
Dexia Bank [$107 million]
EIM Group (European investment firm) [$230 million]
Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity [$15.2 million: 100% loss]
Eric Roth, film writer [$ unknown]
Fairfield Greenwich Advisors & Group, Walter Noel [$7,500 million]
Fairfield Sentry/Sigma Fund [see Fairfield] [$7.28 billion]
Fairfield, CT (town pension fund for public employees) [$42 million]
Feinstein, Leonard, co-founder of Bed Bath & Beyond [$ unknown]
Fix Asset Management [$400 million]
Fortis Bank, Nederland (Dutch bank) [$1,350 million-$1,400 million]
Gerald Breslauer, Los Angeles financial adviser [$ unknown]
Gift of Life Bone Marrow Foundation [$1.8 million]
Great Eastern Holdings, Singapore [$64 million]
Groupama [$13.6 million]
Harel Insurance [$14.2 million]
Harley International Ltd [Cayman: all its assets: $2.76 billion managed as at end-October 2008]
Henry Kaufman, economist [$ unknown]
Herald USA [see Bank Medici] [$2.50 billion]
HSBC Holdings [$1,000 million]
Hyopswiss (Swiss private bank) [$50 million]
Jeffrey Katzenberg [$ unknown]
JEHT Foundation [$ unknown]
Jewish Federation of Greater Washington [$10 million]
Jewish Foundation of Greater Los Angeles [$6.4 million]
Julian J. Levitt Foundation [$6.0 million]
Kevin Bacon, actor [$ unknown]
Kingate Global Management [FIM Advisors] [$2.75 billion – $3,500 million]
Korea Life Insurance [$50 million]
Lautenberg, Senator Frank and family foundation [$ unknown]
Liliane Bettencourt, L’Oréal SA heiress [$ billions unknown]
LuxALPHA SICAV – American Selection [Ascot International Advisors] [$1.4 billion]
M & B Capital Advisers (Spanish bank) [$52.8 million]
Madoff Family Foundation [$19 million]
Maimonides School [Up to $5 million]
Man Group (British hedge fund) [$360 million]
Maxam Capital Management (CT-based fund of funds) [$280 million]
Mediobanca [$0.7 million]
Merkin, Ezra, Chairman of GMAC Corporation: see Ascot Partners
Mirabaud [$ several million]
Mortimer B. Zuckerman Charitable Remainder Trust [$30 million]
Natixis (French investment bank) [$554 million]
Neue Privat Bank [$5.0 million]
New York Law School through Ascot Partners [At least $3 million]
Nomura Holdings [$304 million]
Nordea Bank (Swedish bank) [$59 million]
North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health Care System [$5.7 million
Notz Stucki [$ unknown]
Optimal Strategic US Equity [see Santander] [$3.23 billion]
Picower Foundation [$958 million: has announced closure]
Pioneer Alternative Investments [$280 million]
Primeo Select Fund US [UniCredit. Pioneer Alt Invs] [$0.85 billion]
Ramaz School [$6.0 million]
Reichmuth, (Swiss private bank) The Reichmuth Matterhorn Fund [$327 million]
Robert J. Lappin Charitable Foundation [$8 million: 100% loss]
Royal Bank of Scotland [$599 million-$625 million]
Rye Select broad market Fund [see Tremont] $3.10 billion]
SAR Academy [$1.2 million]
Senator Frank R. Lautenberg’s Charitable Foundation [$ unknown]
Société Générale [$13.8 million]
Stephen Spielberg [$ unknown]
Sterling Equities [[$ unknown]
Swiss Life Holding (Swiss insurer) [$78.9 million]
Thema International Fund [see Bank Medici] [$1.10 billion]
Tremont Group Holdings, hedge fund of Massachusetts Mutual Life [$3,300 million]
Tufts University [$20 million]
UBI Banca (Italian bank) [$86 million]
UBS AG [$ unknown]
UniCredit (Italian bank) [$92 million]
Union Bancaire Privée (Swiss bank) [$700 million -$1,080 million]
Vincent Tchenguiz, UK property magnate, via Bramdean [£40 million]
Wilpon, Fred, owner of the New York Mets [$ unknown]
Wunderkinder Foundation, Steven Spielberg [$ unknown, heavy Madoff investor]
Yeshiva University, New York [$110-$125 million: but see text above]
Zuckerman, Morton, Chairman of Boston Properties, landlords of the Citibank offices at 399 Park Avenue and owner of The New York Daily News and U.S. News and World Report [significant losses through a fund that invested substantially all of its assets with Madoff’]

FORMER PRESIDENT CLINTON FORCED TO REVEAL HIS ‘DONORS’
Finally, in a further indication that the skids are well and truly under the highest-level financial fraudsters, we must add that former President Clinton released what The New York Times called ‘a complete list’ of more than 200,000 ‘donors’ [sic] to the William J. Clinton Foundation ‘as part of an agreement to douse concerns about potential conflicts of interest if Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is confirmed as the Secretary of State in the Obama Administration’. The list revealed that ‘some of the world’s richest people and most famous celebrities handed over large checks to finance his Presidential Library and charitable [sic] activities’.

The New York Times’ articles [19th and 20th December 2008] did not, however, mention that the Clinton Library is equipped with some of the most sophisticated state-of-the-art eavesdropping and electronic equipment in the world, and that the new list of donors and donations (of which a small selection is appended below) is indicative of a ‘you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours’ approach, also known in the United States as ‘pay to play’.

• The disclosure of these names represents a component of a deal intended to smooth the way for Mrs Clinton to be confirmed and to move seamlessly into the State Department. On 4th January, the facile British Press was praising Mrs Clinton as ‘an honest broker’. Manifestly, Fleet Street uses a dictionary not available to the rest of us. It would be helpful if the stupid UK journalists concerned would belatedly look up the word ‘honest’ in the Oxford English Dictionary.

Funds for the Katrina disaster were channelled corruptly into a joint ‘foundation’ controlled by George H. W. Bush Sr. and former President Clinton, under the ‘nose’ of the complicit or feeble Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA, originally funded with ‘Black Ops’ drug money).

The fate of the Katrina money has subsequently been ‘successfully’ obfuscated by the highest-level current and former office-holding criminal financiers, so that it is currently not possible to identify Katrina funds having been moved into the William J. Clinton Foundation: but logic would suggest that this would have occurred, and/or that the funds were used to finance illicit below-the-radar financial leveraging transactions, in the usual manner.

The ‘deal’, brokered by the Obama team represented by its co-chairwoman Valerie Jarrett, reflects a 5-page Memorandum of Understanding signed on 12th December 2008 with the William J. Clinton Foundation, represented by its Chief Executive, Bruce R. Lindsey. This Memorandum required Mr Clinton to disclose his past donors by the end of 2008 and any future contributors once a year.

It also required that that ‘if’ Mrs Clinton is confirmed, the Clinton Global Initiative, an offshoot of the Foundation, will be incorporated separately, will no longer hold events outside the United States and will refuse any further contributions from foreign governments.

More vaguely, other initiatives operating under the auspices of the Foundation would follow new rules and consult with US State Department ethics officials in certain circumstances. (There is of course no reference in the document to any requirement that the ‘ethics officials’ have oversight over the intended illicit financial activities of the criminal operative Hillary Clinton in the event that, as intended, this Jezebel winds up as Secretary of State).

Previously, Mr Clinton had declined to reveal the identities of donors to his Foundation, as Federal law does not require former US Presidents to reveal foundation donors. Clinton’s main argument had been that many donors expected confidentiality.

Yet, all of a sudden, this ‘concern’ was jettisoned, in the scramble to ensure that Mrs Clinton arrives at the State Department without being cuffed and jailed or bailed on the way.

To mask this U-turn, Clinton advocates waffled following the disclosures that the list showed that Mr Clinton had nothing to hide, which is NOT the point that Clinton relied upon earlier when he declined to publish the list in order to preserve the confidentiality of the donors. Many of these parties will certainly have been chagrined at the emergence of their identifies as Clinton donors, into the public domain – not least because as this concatenation of immense financial scandals progressively expands like a solar explosion, they risk their names being dragged into the sewer along with those of the Clinton criminals themselves.

PARTIAL LIST OF CLINTON FOUNDATION ‘DONORS’
The following partial list of prominent ‘donors’ to the William J Clinton Foundation has been assembled to illustrate the ‘pay-to-play’ dimension of the way these crooks operate, lifting the veil on how these organised US gangsters have spread their filthy corruption throughout the world:

• Selected prominent donors to the William J. Clinton Foundation out of a total of 200,000 donors named by former President Clinton on 18th December 2008 in the interests of ‘transparency’ but contrary to the interests of the donors and as part of the deal to infiltrate Mrs Clinton into the State Department, where she will be ‘protected’ and from where the intention is that the fraudulent finance operations will continue:

Absolute Return for Kids [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Abu Dhabi Ruling Family [$ not known by this service]
Alfonso Fanjul [$ not known by this service]
Alix Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Amar Singh [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Arnold H. Simon [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Ausaid [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Australian Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Barbra Streisand/Streisand Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Bernard L Schwartz [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Blackwater Training Center [$ not known by this service]
Blackwater Training Center [$ not known by this service]
Bloomberg L.P. [$ not known by this service]
Bren and Melvin Simon [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Brunei Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Cameron Diaz, actress [Between $25,001 and $50,000]
Children’s Investment Fund Foundation, [More than $25 million]
Citi Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative, Canada [$1,000,001 to $5.0 million]
Copresida-Secretariado Tecnico [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Denise Rich [Brand], former wife of Marc Rich [Hans Brand] [$250,001 to $500,000]
Dominican Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Dubai Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Eli and Edythe Broade Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
ELMA Foundation [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Elton John AIDS Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Entergy Corporation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Frank Giustra, CEO, Radcliffe Foundation [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Fred Eychaner [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Freddie Mac [$ not known by this service]
Friends of Saudi Arabia [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Gilbert R. Chagoury [Nigerian President Abacha crony] [$1,000,00 to $5.0 million]
Government of Brunei Darussalam [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Government of Norway [Between $5,000,001 and $10 million]
Haim Saban and Saban Family Foundation [Between $5,000,001 and $10 million]
Howard and Michele Kessler [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Howard Gilman Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Hunter Foundation [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Issam M. Fares & Wedge Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
James P. Greenbaum Jr. Family Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
John D. Mackay [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Kuwait Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Lakshmi N. Mittal [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Lukas H. Lundin [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
MAC AIDS Fund [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Mala Gaonkar Haarmann [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Michael and Jena King [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Michael Schumacher [Between $5,000,001 and $10 million]
Michael Smurfit [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Harold Snyder [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Nasser al-Rashid [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Nationale Postcode Loterij [Between $5,000,001 and $10 million]
Norwegian Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Omani Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Open Society Institute (George Soros) [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Paul Reynolds [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Presidential Inaugural Committee [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Princess Diana Memorial Fund [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Qatari Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Richard Caring [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Robert L. Johnson [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Robertson Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Rockefeller Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable and Educational Trust [$1,000,001 to $5.0 million]
Rupert Murdoch [$ not known by this service]
S. D. Abraham [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Sheikh Mohammed al-Amoudi [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Smith and Elizabeth Bagley [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
State of Kuwait [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
State of Qatar [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Stephen L. Bing [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Sterling Stamos Capital Management [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Sultanate of Oman [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Suzlon Energy [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Swiss Reinsurance Company [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Sydney E. Frank Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
T. G. Holdings [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Taiwan Economic and Cultural Office [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Taiwan Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Theodore W. Watt [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Tom Golisano [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Unitaid [More than $25 million]
Victor Phillip Dahdaleh Charitable Foundation [$1,000,001 to $5.0 million]
Victor Pinchuk, Ukrainian oligarch [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Wallace W. Fowler [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Wal-Mart Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Walter H. Shorenstein [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Walton Family Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Wasserman Foundation [Between $5,000,001 and $10 million]
Zayed Family [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]

CONCLUSION: U.S. DOLLAR REFUNDING MUST PROCEED AS DEMANDED BY THE G-7
Since the State Department controls much of the money operations, it is clear that the objective of the controlling corrupt “powers” has indeed been to continue the fraudulent finance operations from within the White House and the US Treasury for the next four or eight years, as previously: in other words, the fraudulent, debt-generating exotic financing was to continue seamlessly with a replacement set of highest-level fraudulent finance operatives in place, many of whom (led by Mrs Clinton and Rahm Emanuel) were/have been involved in this terrorism financing activity all along.

That is the objective ‘as we speak’. Will it be achieved? It is understood, to begin with, that former President Bill Clinton was captured some time ago on a videotape made in Alabama, referring to President-Elect Obama in disparaging ethnic terms. We have now learned that outgoing President George W. ‘Dog’ Bush is also on record as describing to Mr Obama in comparable language. Both these racist outbursts have been channelled back to the President-Elect, who reportedly laughed at the perpetrators. But ingrained in this response, we were told, was the following message:

‘You can be rude about me now, if you like. But wait and see what I’m made of when I am in power’.

Being interpreted, this means (we speak with ‘understanding’) that if you imagine that you can pressurise me, you have yet to learn what resources I can bring to bear to make you think again.

Therefore, whether the incoming President will in fact allow the fraudulent finance operations to continue seamlessly, thereby ensuring a colossal financial and economic implosion worldwide early in his Administration, the collapse of gigantic corrupted US and foreign institutions, the destruction of his Presidency and Law and Order, and the collapse of the US dollar plus an immediate reversion to ‘beggar-thy-neighbour’ competitive currency devaluations and a bitter global trade war followed by open warfare remains, in our view, on a knife-edge at this time.

• But the central issue THAT NO-ONE CAN POSSIBLY ESCAPE, is this:

DOLLAR REFUNDING CAN ONLY BE DONE BY GENERATING REVENUE, NOT DEBT
The US dollar needs refunding NOW, which cannot be done by the US Government at all, because the US Government CAN ONLY CREATE DEBT.

• IT CANNOT GENERATE REVENUE. No Government can GENERATE TAXABLE REVENUE.

The previous refunding of the US dollar was initiated by President Reagan and confirmed for public consumption by means of a communiqué dated 17th August 1982. The US dollar is in extreme need of a further refunding, to enable it to regain its capitalisation value and thus to renew the world’s international trading markets.

This can ONLY be done by means of the overdue Private Sector Refunding mechanism long since prescribed by the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme of Capital Markets operations, generating cash REVENUE and not DEBT – with substantial ongoing on-the-books tax accruals paid into the US Treasury, to break the century-long, sterile and now completely discredited US debt-financing orgy which has brought the United States to its current status as a pariah state, reliant on exporting terrorism to ‘get its way’ and provide open-ended pretexts for it to seize the resources of others.

For this US Dollar Refunding Programme to be viable, there must be third party auditing: and the Government and its Presidential Cabinet, with an Economic Team tainted by the fraudulent finance operations of previous Administrations, cannot, in any case, be relied upon, given past experience, to do so in an objective manner.

To preclude a catastrophic perpetuation of the degenerate fraudulent finance carousel system, which is bringing the world financial and real economies to the verge of irremediable breakdown, accompanied by the collapse of colossal financial institutions and the US dollar, full disclosure and disciplined transparent regulation in perpetuity are prerequisites.

NO SOLUTION IS AVAILABLE OTHER THAN ON-THE-BOOKS.

It CANNOT be done off-the-books: and, despite immense Bush-Cheney bribery, if the Rest of the World sees the Obama Administration ‘trying this on’, and sidestepping the precise Group of Seven requirements, there will, as Senator C Dodd has said in another, related, context, be HELL TO PAY.

• WORLD-WIDE HELL TO PAY. THIS YEAR. PROBABLY IN THIS QUARTER.

SUMMARY: If the new Administration follows through with any ‘solution’ falling short of these long outstanding, pre-agreed G-7 standards, THE U.S. DOLLAR WILL COLLAPSE, the whole of humanity will suffer on a scale with no historical precedent, and the American Republic WILL NOT SURVIVE.

As the late, great Sherman Skolnik, who was right more often than wrong (sometimes he was completely off the wall, especially towards the end) used to day: Watch this space.

• References, Notes and the original Ponzi Scheme:

(1) Data courtesy of Victor Thorn, veteran researcher,
journalist and anti-New Underworld Order Author.

(2) Prudent Man Rule: This is the fundamental American principle that is applicable in respect of professional money management, originally asserted by Judge Samuel Putnum in 1830 as follows:

‘Those with responsibility to invest money for others should act with prudence, discretion, intelligence, and regard for the safety of capital as well as income’ [1830 Massachusetts Court decision: Harvard College v. Armory]. The Prudent Man Rule directs Trustees ‘to observe how men of prudence, discretion and intelligence manage their own affairs, not in regard to speculation, but in regard to the management and disposition of their funds, considering the probable income as well as the probable safety of the capital to be invested’. Investments in risky Ponzi and Pyramid Schemes and in ‘programs’ such as those referenced, typically breach the Prudent Man Rule.

Sources: (a) World Reports Limited website report dated 22nd July 2008 entitled: ‘U.S. market revamp is false prospectus’; (b) World Reports Limited website report dated 18th September 2008 entitled: ‘Michael C. Cottrell’s U.S. financial reform proposals; (International Currency Review, Volume 34, Number 1, THE COTTRELL PLAN, pages 243-272 and GLOSSARY, pages 293-326.

(3) On 13th and 22nd January 2007, this service SPECIFICALLY identified the methodology used by the CIA/Bush financial fraudsters as being based on the CLASSIC PONZI MODEL In retrospect, it is clear that few US Ponzi scam victims took the relevance of this on board. Now the name ‘Ponzi’ is finally all over the newspapers: but ONLY, so far, in the Madoff context. It needs to be applied to ALL THE INTERLINKED BUSH-CLINTON-CIA FINANCIAL SCANDALS, RIGHT ACROSS THE BOARD.
It is high time that our message in January 2007 was finally understood: PONZI is the STANDARD METHODOLOGY used for all these scamming operations mounted by criminalised US intelligence-linked cadres, to impoverish and steal from their victims AT HOME AND ABROAD. IT IS STANDARD PROCEDURE. The broken-hearted ‘package people’ investors are classic PONZI SCAM VICTIMS.

This is not, as some knee-jerk hysterics will claim, apologetics for the criminals: IT’S FACT. And the way to deal with FACT, however unpleasant, is to FACE IT. The way NOT to deal with FACT is to place one’s faith in ANONYMOUS SOURCES that, by definition, lack all credibility, whose reporting cannot be verified and which hide behind anonymity so that when they are caught out lying, they cannot be held accountable. These cowards are suspected by sane people of cynically peddling endless tall stories and disinformation that is fed to them for the self-evident purpose of keeping the scammed victims on the edge of their seats until they die. Beware of such faceless charlatans.

• MANY HAVE DIED WAITING FOR THEIR PIED PIPERS TO PLAY THEM A NICE CLOSING TUNE.

Website outlets focusing on keeping the scammed victims expecting payouts have now veered into total chaos mode, blaming everyone on earth from the probably recently deceased Madame Wu to Father Christmas in a deliberately shambolic and thoroughly cynical obfuscation offensive, designed EXCLUSIVELY to protect the perpetrators from the inevitable backlash and retribution that awaits them as soon as the scammed victims finally come to terms with the fact that they have been raped, pillaged, ransacked, and ‘hollowed out’. In readiness for the possibility that they’ll have to keep going for 8 more dreary years, targets have been switched from the Bushes to Obama.

The victims have all along been despised by the primary perpetrators, who couldn’t care less about their plight and are concerned EXCLUSIVELY with the protection of their assets and bodies against the days of reckoning that await them. The fact that the Omega Ponzi operations and related scams against private victims were perpetrated by the criminalised US intelligence community does NOT mean that the perpetrators will not receive their overdue come-uppance: it simply means that a war of attrition has to be waged against these devils, who have wrecked so many Americans’ lives.

(If the Editor is attacked for stating the truth after this posting, we will expose the backing behind the perpetrating website(s) involved in this outrageously cynical disinformation campaign).

The two initial reports in which we SPECIFICALLY exposed the Ponzi scamming dimension, which has of course now finally burst into the ‘mainstream’ with the ‘Madoff takedown’, were as follows:

(a) ‘US intelligence community OMEGA OPS/’Ponzi Game’ frauds’:
13th January 2007.

(b) ‘Treasongate background: Intel Ponzi Scamming:
Classic Ponzi Model for Unregistered Thievery’:
22nd January 2007

The report dated 22nd January 2007 containing our first posting of the summary of the classic Ponzi scam entitled ‘How Charles Ponzi pulled it off: Making a fine art out of a pyramid fraud’, was initially published in International Currency Review, Volume 27, Number 3, December 2001, pages 51-52.

• This text is now repeated immediately below, for ease of reference:

THE ORIGINAL PONZI SCHEME EXPLAINED: AGAIN, IN CASE YOU MISSED IT EARLIER
Charles Ponzi, an immigrant from Italy to Boston, MA, made millions of dollars for a brief period, by exploiting his shrewd observation that while national currencies were fluctuating wildly in 1920, just after the end of the First World War, the Universal Postal Union (UPU) issued coupons which were always worth a given amount of postage stamps.

In those days, European refugees were flocking to the United States, Canada and Brazil; and often, their only contact with their families and friends back home was an occasional letter, enclosing a few dollars. The Universal Postal Union arranged to move the millions of letters, standard business documents and messages across national borders by issuing Postal Reply Coupons. You bought a Postal Reply Coupon in your country of residence, and enclosed it with your letter.

Your mother, once she had received the letter, exchanged the Postal Reply Coupon for stamps at her local post office.

Charles Ponzi told friends in Boston: ‘Everybody’s heard of the Postal Union. They print coupons like these I’m holding here: Postal Reply Coupons. You can send a letter home, or anywhere in the world, with these coupons. And you can trade this coupon for a stamp in any country. I send my mother coupons with every letter that I write home’.

‘Now, in cooperation with certain large businesses in our city, I am making a fortune on the Postal Reply Coupon. Stocks are too risky. Forget it. And bonds, what are they paying right now? Maybe six percent? Savings accounts at Tremont Trust, they’ll give you four and a half cents on the dollar. Give them $100 and they’ll give you back $104.50. I can beat that into the ground’, Ponzi insisted, beating his cane against the floor. ‘My investors get 50 cents on the dollar. Place a hundred dollars with my Securities Exchange Company, and you take out $150. Put that $150 in, you’ll get back $225. That’s right, in six months, you can more than double your money’.

How could he pay 50%, when banks couldn’t even manage 5%? ‘Exchange rates’, Mr Ponzi explained. ‘Every morning I go down and check to see how the lira is doing against the dollar. Usually you get five lire for a dollar. This morning I checked, and with the war just ended, it takes 20 lire to the dollar’. While currency rates were bouncing around like popcorn, Mr Ponzi explained, the Postal Reply Coupon always bought one stamp. Here’s what I do’.

‘I send my cousin in Parma, Italy, $1.0. He exchanges the dollar for lire. With these 20 lire (2,000 centesimi), he can buy 66 Postal Reply Coupons (worth 30 centesimi each, the cost of a letter-sized stamp in Italy). Back in the United States, each of the coupons will buy one stamp, face value five cents. I redeem all 66 coupons for $3.30 worth of stamps. The magic happens in the exchange rate. In America, my dollar buys 20 Postal Coupons. But if I exchange the US dollar for lire, and buy the coupons in Italy, then return and buy the stamps in America, I get $3.30 worth of stamps for that same $1.0. My profit margin is 230%’.

‘Yeah, but $3.30 worth of stamps is still stamps’, complained an attentive listener.

‘I know’, said Ponzi. ‘So I sell the stamps at a 10% discount through my contacts with the larger firms downtown. Deducting the discount, I’ve got $3.0 cash now, from the $1.0 that I started out with.

Now, let’s say, I got that dollar from you. I will pay you back your dollar, plus 50 cents interest. Since I just sold $3.0 worth of stamps, I have a dollar and 50 cents for myself’.

‘I’m going to spend a third of that money on my offices and processing overheads, and a third on commissions and bonuses to my sales people; and then, ladies and gentlemen, I’m going to pocket the other third and take my wife for a stroll’.

This was the essence of the original Ponzi scheme. Note that in this description, Ponzi starts out by exploiting the fluctuations of exchange rates, and the lack of arbitrage; and note that, by the end of the explanation, he is simply offering 50% interest, which he pays out to old claimants out of the additional funds he has received from other investors who are likewise anticipating a 50% return on their investments, within a short space of time.

The germ of the idea was derived from the foreign exchange market; but once Ponzi has realised that people will pour money his way if they are promised a 50% return, he can finally abandon his elaborate explanation (‘his ‘prospectus’) of the exploitation of exchange rate fluctuations and the tedious task of shipping, receiving, handling and exchanging Postal Reply Coupons, which gave him the ‘easy money’ idea in the first place.

In other words, his sales pitch is no more than a now redundant, expendable illustration – a false prospectus which disguises the fact that he is really promoting a pyramid selling operation. For he has realised that all his investors care about is receiving 50% on their money. How this is to be achieved does not normally concern them.

By December 1920, Charles Ponzi was matching old money with ever larger amounts of new money. In May 1921 alone, almost $500,000 of new money poured into the Securities Exchange Company – as 1,500 or more new customers, lured by the 50% yield offered through advertisements, sought their share of the huge profits they thought would be forthcoming at minimal risk. The office now bulged with fat stacks of dollar bills.

THE FLOOR STARTS TO GIVE WAY BENEATH HIM
But problems started to arise when Joseph Daniels filed a lawsuit alleging that he had helped to found the Securities Exchange Company (SEC) with a loan of $230 worth of furniture plus $200 in cash. Daniels had indeed provided the beaten-up desks that had been offloaded in the dusty office, and had let Mr Ponzi have $200 to spark interest in the Postal Coupons.

It wasn’t simply a loan, Mr Daniels maintained, now that Mr Ponzi was drowning in cash. ‘We were partners. I put up capital and property’. On 2nd July, Mr Ponzi was handed a demand for $1.0 million.

The Boston Post telephoned, and Mr Ponzi told the reporter that he had indeed bought furniture from Mr Daniels, but that he had never received any money for investment from him.

But when the newly installed banking commissioner for Massachusetts, Joseph Allen, read the newspaper, he wondered: ‘Where did Ponzi come from? Who are his associates? How is he managing to double people’s money?’

Allen asked Ponzi to pop round to his office, for an interview. The Securities Exchange Company did not describe itself as a bank, nor did it offer any banking services. Therefore, in the absence of a complaint – and none had yet arrived – the Commissioner had no jurisdiction to examine Ponzi’s business. At the interview, Ponzi explained the curiosities surrounding Postal Coupons, pointed out that money chased money, collected his coat, doffed his hat, and bid Mr Allen goodbye.

But Richard Grozier, city editor at The Boston Post, had always thought that Charles Ponzi’s scheme was fraudulent; and to initiate what he fancied would indeed be the inevitable débacle, he elicited a comment from one of Boston’s leading citizens, Clarence Barron, the owner of Dow Jones & Co and The Wall Street Journal.

At the end of July 1920, The Boston Post carried a front page story entitled: ‘Clarence Barron questions the motive behind Ponzi’s scheme’.

Theoretically, Barron admitted, you could indeed turn a profit on the UPU coupons. But that was the only truth buried within the operation. You could never earn more than a few thousand dollars, not just because of the trouble involved in offloading the stamps and tracking the various conversions driving the process, but because there simply were not enough coupons available.

France, Romania and Spain had just abandoned the scheme, a few months earlier. A cursory check with the UPU showed that they had a few hundred thousand dollars’ worth of coupons in circulation – nowhere near the $10 million or $15 million Mr Ponzi claimed to be trading. So where was Ponzi getting his coupons from? Furthermore, the US Postal Service had announced, on 2nd July 1920, that Postal Reply Coupons would no longer be redeemable in lots larger than ten. So how was Ponzi converting his coupons into stamps?

Finally, Barron asked, if Ponzi is doubling everyone else’s money, why does he keep his own funds in regional banks? The Boston Post knew that Ponzi kept millions of dollars on deposit at seven or eight New England banks, and that the accounts were ballooning. How could a man who was paying 100% interest every 90 days, put up with drawing just 4% on his holdings? Barron concluded:

‘Right under the eyes of our Government, Mr Ponzi has been paying out US money to one line, with deposits taken from a succeeding line’ (another bank).

All of a sudden, all the doors which had flown back on their hinges at the sight of Mr Ponzi, were slamming tight shut. The Massachusetts District Attorney ordered Ponzi to cease and desist. His customers demanded their money back, and Ponzi was eventually jailed for Federal mail fraud, then deported. He wound up destitute in South America.

(4) The following documents were obtained by the Editor from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in December 2008:

1: Securities and Exchange Commission COMPLAINT vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791 filed 4:51pm 11 December 2008.

2: Securities and Exchange Commission COMPLAINT vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791 (LLS): Appointment of Receiver, Lee Richards, partner of Richards Kibbe & Orbe LLP ‘over all the assets and accounts of defendant Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“BMIS”) outside of the United States, to take control forthwith over BMIS’s dealings and transactions with any non-United States entity or counterparty, with full access to BMIS’s books and records necessary or useful to him in the exercise of his powers over BMIS’s foreign business or transactions’ signed by United States District Judge Louis L. Stanton at 6.42pm on 12th December 2008.

3: Securities and Exchange Commission ORDER vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791 (LLS) ECF Case: Order to show cause, Temporary Restraining Order and Order Freezing Assets and Granting Other Relief; Order consented to by defendants and therefore signed off by United States District Judge Louis L. Stanton at 4:51pm on 13th December 2008.

4: Securities and Exchange Commission and Securities and Investor Protection Corporation ORDER vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791: Appointing Irving H. Picard as Trustee and law firm Baker & Hostetler LLP as Counsel for the Trustee ‘with all the duties and powers of a Trustee as is prescribed by the Securities Investor Protection Act’, and inter alia authorising the Trustee ‘to take immediate possession of the property of the Defendant, wherever located, including but not limited to the books and the records of the Defendant, and to open accounts and obtain a safe deposit box at a bank or banks to be chosen by the Trustee’: signed by United States District Judge Louis L. Stanton at 4:08pm on 13th December.

5: Securities and Exchange Commission and Securities and Investor Protection Corporation ORDER vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791: Application to the Court of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC), signed and filed on 15th December 2008.

6: Securities and Exchange Commission and Securities and Investor Protection Corporation ORDER vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791: Memorandum of Law in support of the application to the Court of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation; signed and filed on 15th December 2008.

7: Securities and Exchange Commission and Securities and Investor Protection Corporation ORDER vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791: Consent by Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, signed by Bernard L. Madoff as ‘Sole Member’, to the service of the Complaint and the Application by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation, dated, notarised and filed on 15th December 2008.

8: United States of America v. Bernard L. Madoff: Case # 08 MAG 2735: AGREEMENT TO FORFEIT PROPERTY, signed by Bernard L. Madoff and Ruth Madoff on 17th December 2008 and filed on that date. The property forfeited: 133 East 64th Street, Apt 11A/PH, New York, NY 10065; 410 N. Lake Way, Palm Beach, FL 33480; 216 Old Montauk Highway, NY 11954.

9: Extensive miscellaneous related documentation.

George Orwell: ‘In an age of deceit, speaking the truth is a revolutionary act’.

US friend: ‘You are to be congratulated on a masterful piece of research in exposing the treason and the biggest heist in history’.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

WASHINGTON EXPOSED AS SECRETLY FINANCING AL-QAEDA

PRESIDENT-ELECT OBAMA DEMANDS PAYMENT OF THE SETTLEMENTS

Wednesday 3 December 2008 02:30

BIGGEST TERRORISM SCANDAL IN WORLD HISTORY UNFOLDING BEFORE OUR EYES

SECRET ROOM INSIDE MORGAN STANLEY FUNDING AL-QAEDA AND GLOBAL TERRORISM

COVER-UP OPERATIONS ‘BLOWN’: WASHINGTON HAS BEEN FINANCING GLOBAL TERROR

NOW WE KNOW WHY THESE SNAKES HAVE BEEN WRIGGLING, SPITTING AND SQUIRMING

• IMPORTANT NOTICE: 4TH DECEMBER 2008:
The Editor has been informed that there have been no arguments, no objections, no disputes, no denials whatsoever Stateside re: the crucial intelligence concerning the room or suite inside the premises of Morgan Stanley exposed in this report, which was being used as the financial sector base for the U.S.-DRIVEN FINANCING OF TERRORISM AND AL-QAEDA ALL AROUND THE WORLD.

• The key reason for this is that THE INTELLIGENCE CAME FROM THE INVESTIGATION ITSELF. It is therefore RECONFIRMED that THE WHITE HOUSE HAS BEEN FINANCING AL-QAEDA AND TERRORISM, and therefore ECONOMIC TERRORISM AGAINST HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN.

• It is further confirmed that ALL PARTICIPANTS IN THE TERRORISM FINANCING OPERATIONS, which means ALL APPARATCHIKS, OFFICIALS, SPECIAL BRANCH, POLITICIANS, BANKERS AND OTHERS who have been involved in this despicable and loathesome activity on both sides of the Atlantic ARE NOW THEMSELVES KNOWN TERRORISTS. THIS HAS NOW BEEN CONFIRMED.

• As a direct and immediate consequence of THIS POSTING, the Editor was informed just before midnight that the word from Washington is that it is now intended to quote ‘DO EVERYTHING BY THE BOOK’. In other words, it is CYA time, BIG-TIME, as the filthy criminal rats scramble to AVOID BEING ARRESTED OR OTHERWISE ‘DEALT WITH’ BECAUSE THEY ARE THEMSELVES KNOWN TERRORISTS. Until the exposure of the Morgan Stanley TERRORISM FINANCING CENTRE, they fondly imagined that all our accusations of their pursuit of economic terrorism would wash over everyone’s head. FOLLOWING THIS POSTING, THEY HAVE HAD TO CHANGE THEIR ATTITUDE.

• There is a deeper point to take on board here. What is meant by ‘DOING EVERYTHING BY THE BOOK’? It is ‘cornered criminalist’ language which, being interpreted, has the following obvious PRACTICAL IMPLICATION: persuading compliant bankers, participants, intermediaries and their counterparties to go along with financing operations which ‘smell’ IS GOING TO BECOME A LOT HARDER, IF NOT ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE NOW. The bankers et al. are going to ‘cease to cooperate’, out of fear that they will be picked up for FINANCING TERRORISM. AND THEY WILL.

• That’s what ‘GOING BY THE BOOK’ means and will mean, in practice.

• FACT: They will ALSO have to wind up the AL-QAEDA and all the related GLOBAL TERRORISM operations. Both Britain and America will have to get out of financing terrorism, and this will have to be done immediately. OVER TO YOU, PRESIDENT-ELECT OBAMA. This may be your finest hour.

• What are YOU going to do about this, Gordon Brown? DROP THIS ANTI-TERRORISM COVER WHICH IS A CRUDE MASK FOR HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANOURS, FOR STARTERS.

• Drop the hideous GESTAPO legislation that you announced in The Queen’s Speech today, too.

• Memorandum to the cadres who are behind the curve in the UK: Special Branch, etc: See foot of this report. Take on board that a rearguard operation to intimidate the Editor of this service is OUT OF ORDER and that our communications with US parties MUST BE RESTORED IMMEDIATELY, AS YOU ARE NOW IN BREACH OF CERTAIN INSTRUCTIONS THAT HAVE BEEN ISSUED FOR OUR PROTECTION. See to it that you follow through with this demand, and cease and desist NOW.

INCOMING U.S. PRESIDENT BRIEFED BY C.I.A. IMMEDIATELY AFTER MCCAIN CONCEDED

INTERFERENCE WITH COMMUNICATIONS BY FORT MEADE FAILS TO KEEP LID ON SCANDAL

OBAMA HORRIFIED AND DISGUSTED AT WHAT HE FOUND OUT. ANGRY WITH BIDEN, TOO.

EVEN SO, BUSH TRIED TO BRIBE BARACK OBAMA WHEN HE VISITED THE WHITE HOUSE

BUSH CRIMINALISTS WARNED: ‘YOU TOUCH OBAMA AND YOU REALLY ARE DEAD MEAT’

WASHINGTON PIGS DEMAND THE RIGHT TO STICK THEIR NOSES IN THE TROUGH FIRST

DEMANDING PAYMENT TO THEIR ‘FOUNDATIONS’ FOR CORRUPT ‘SERVICES RENDERED’

PRESIDENT-ELECT OBAMA ADVISED THAT HE MAY HAVE TO ASSUME POWER EARLY

BUSH JR. SLOW-HAND-CLAPPED BY G-20 DELEGATES WHEN HE WALKED OUT IN A HUFF

TRIED TO SELL THE AMERO SCAM TO THE JADED G-20 MEETING, AND WAS REBUFFED

DUPLICITOUS GORDON BROWN HAD BEEN SECRETLY IMPEDING THE SETTLEMENTS

OBAMA SENT AN EMISSARY TO TELL BROWN TO CEASE AND DESIST OR BE ARRESTED

OBAMA WORKING IN ‘LOCK-STEP’ WITH SARKOZY AND MI6 TO PUT THINGS IN ORDER

ROBERT RUBIN SECRETLY SUPERVISED DIVERSION OF KEY FUNDS TO ATHENS, GREECE

NO WAY GEITHNER COULD NOT HAVE KNOWN ABOUT THESE SCANDALS AND CORRUPTION

MUST HAVE KNOWN, TOO, ABOUT THE CRIMS’ SECRET BANK ACCOUNTS AT CITIBANK

TONY BLAIR’S DEVASTATING ‘ROLLOVER’ TESTIMONY HAS SET EVERYTHING ABLAZE

BLAIR AND BUSH, ‘VIA ECCLESTONE’, SET UP LONDON AS FRAUDULENT FINANCE CENTRE

THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM IS BREAKING DOWN AS CREDIT INSURANCE IS PULLED

BRITAIN AND AMERICA HOVERING ON THE BRINK OF A DEPRESSION, AS WE PREDICTED

BUSH SR. SHIPPED PRINTING PLATES TO SADDAM: AT ‘SWITCH’, HAD TO RETRIEVE THEM

• 2.30PM 3RD DECEMBER, UK: SEE NEW DETAILS ABOUT A VISIT TO OUR LONDON OFFICE
BY UK SPECIAL BRANCH OFFICERS AT 12.45 THIS AFTERNOON: FOOT OF THIS REPORT

• 10.45PM, 3RD DECEMBER, UK: COMMUNICATIONS AND SETTLEMENTS UPDATE:
Seems friends of Special Branch didn’t like what we posted at 2.30pm [see above and add-on about the visits from two UK Special Branch officers, by invitation, to this office below]. At the beginning of the day, following our posting the present report overnight, all of a sudden, the interference with our communications, especially to the US office of Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., which had been illegally disrupted for over a week (all the Editor’s calls went into an electronic void), ceased and the line was freed: the Editor got through immediately with no impediment. We presumed that Fort Meade didn’t fancy having all that mud thrown at them internationally.

But at 10.25pm, the Editor called again with further information; and a loud series of crackles and botched connections occurred, as various dirty eavesdropping scumbags rushed to ‘handle’ the situation, causing the Editor’s voice to be cut off, even though Mr Cottrell’s voice could be heard. Given the loudness of these interventions, we assume that the interference was perpetrated by cover-up merchants in the United Kingdom. They don’t like it when we’re as red hot as we are right now: the hot water’s scalding them. So instead of doing the right thing, they hassle the messenger.

When the Editor was able to communicate via another method, he informed Mr Cottrell that a key Trustee had emailed us [03 December 2008: 19:28, as received UK time], as follows: ‘I have not read your latest article but will do so a bit later. My status is that we are told everyone is ready to close. But something is delaying the U.S. side. The Rest of the World is furious because they were given a 24-hour window for payment that expired at 2:00pm NY time, 26 minutes ago. I have people (the high functionary) checking to see what is the delay’. On receipt of this email, the Editor tried the above communications, and finally conveyed this message; and so the situation is being checked out ‘as we speak’. It would appear that our fingering of Gordon Brown below, coupled with the somewhat unpleasant possible veiled threats that may have been uttered against the Editor of this service and his wife earlier in the day [see below], indicate that there are still massive problems in the United Kingdom, although right now the United States is being blamed.

• The familiar ying-yang escapology game again favoured by the giga-criminals, or what?

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

Advertisement:
NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system that assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program that devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. Some versions have a ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

• INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW, Volume 33, #s 3 & 4, all 972 pages of it, is making waves all over the world. It contains a blow-by-blow deconstruction of this crisis via the Wantagate plus our further analyses: and everything published therein is now well and truly ON THE GLOBAL PUBLIC RECORD. Accordingly the whole world owns a detailed, damning account of the serial criminality of the Bush-Cheney-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ et al., which CANNOT BE EXPUNGED.

• INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW, Volume 34, Number 1, consisting of some 400 pages, WAS DISTRIBUTED BY FAST MAIL TO SUBSCRIBERS WORLDWIDE ON 29TH NOVEMBER 2008…

• It tracks the fallout from our exposures of the criminality from mid-April 2008 to 6th October 2008, when this issue of ICR had to go to press. The Glossary that is published with The Cottrell Plan has been separated out and placed at the end of the issue, for long-term ease-of-reference purposes.

• If you wish to obtain a copy and you are not a regular subscriber, please order International Currency Review via our electronic payment system by pressing SUBSCRIBE. This will give a full-price order sequence. Then press CONTACT US and state that you wish to order ICR 34, #1. The single-issue price has to be at a premium to the regular price, charged at $200.00 per copy. Note:
Please ensure that you send a CONTACT US email to the Publisher at the same time as you press SUBSCRIBE, so that we KNOW to send you ONLY ICR 34, #1 and to charge you ONLY $200.

• The CONTACT US facility is found in the red box throughout this combined website.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• Please Make a Donation to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing global financial corruption investigations, which have turned the whole world upside down and have exposed the corruption which was intended to enable the geocriminalist syndicate to seize the wealth of the entire world. These people have finally been more or less completely stopped in their tracks as a consequence of these exposures. Your assistance will be sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. The Editor’s $35,000 Wanta bail-out money was not repaid and so has been stolen.

• See the second white panel for details of our latest distributed intelligence publications.

• MICHAEL C. COTTRELL’S PROPOSALS FOR THE REFORM OF THE U.S FINANCIAL SYSTEM, AND HIS DEBUNKING OF THE IMPRACTICABLE AND EXPENSIVE ‘PAULSON’ PROPOSALS, PLUS OUR EXTENSIVE GLOSSARY, POSTED ON 22ND JULY AND REPOSTED ON 12TH SEPTEMBER, WERE AGAIN ‘SNIPPED’ BY THE NSA’S MENTAL DEFECTIVES. THE REPORT WAS REPOSTED ON 18TH SEPTEMBER 2008. THE REPORT HAS BEEN EXTREMELY WELL RECEIVED WORLDWIDE.

• PRINT EDITIONS OF THE COTTRELL PLAN: Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 11, #s 9 & 10, published in July-August, was devoted almost entirely to The Cottrell Plan and to the extensive Glossary of financial market and related definitions, which explains where so many people have gone wrong. International Currency Review, Volume 34, #1, also contains The Cottrell Plan and the Glossary, placed at the end of this 400-page issue for long-term easy reference.

• Subscriptions by serious observers and analysts to our services may be placed via this website.

• FORT MEADE INTERFERING WITH OUR COMMUNICATIONS: Our communications with certain parties in the United States are being crudely and illegally sabotaged by National Security Agency idiots who imagine that it is still possible to keep the lid on the biggest scandal in world history, and to cover up the reality that the Bush II Administration has been financing Al-Qaeda and other global terrorism operations. Every time these fools try this on, they simply show their hand.

• Midnight, 2nd-3rd December: US sources say that there has been an intensification of illegal interference by Verizon (an intelligence entity) and other US intelligence community entities with their communications, as with ours, as these criminalist cadres now attempt to prevent (a) certain drastic consequences arising from non-performance, and (b) the distribution of the massively damning information in this report about the reckless and criminal behaviour of these pigs in Washington who are scrambling to place their filthy snouts in the Settlements trough first.

• The bottom line: Our assessment that the United States is a Revolutionary Power engaged in promoting terrorism and financing it (from a secret operations room inside Morgan Stanley: see below) is CONFIRMED. The torch of the World Revolution was handed by the Soviets back to the classic revolutionary power, the United States, after 72 years (1917-1989), 72 being the familiar Babylonian ‘Rule of 72’ number. The Americans became much more dangerous than the Soviets.

But the discovery of specific evidence that the deliberate financing of global terrorism has all along been orchestrated from within Morgan Stanley, and that the dirty finger marks of Bush 41, Clinton 42, Paulson, Greenspan, Cheney and Hillary Clinton are all over the tear-sheet evidence, which was obtained from bankers arrested in Europe during autumn 2007, represents BY FAR THE BIGGEST SCANDAL IN WORLD HISTORY which Fort Meade can now do NOTHING to cover up.

Shame on you, stupid electronic criminalist nerds and fools, for imagining that these crimes would remain buried from public scrutiny for ever. Shame on you, ‘mainstream’ broadcast media and press people, for succumbing to Cheney’s pressure not to expose this unprecedented criminality, which embraces CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY. No wonder your circulations and revenues are declining.

AND SHAME ON THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT for collaborating with the TERRORIST UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, when the CORRECT response should have been to EXPOSE THESE TERRORISTS, rather than becoming involved in aiding and abetting these unbelivable crimes against humanity. Collaborating with a pariah terrorist state isn’t pragmatic: it’s reckless, stupid.

Last year, we weren’t allowed to report on the secret Morgan Stanley Terrorism Financing Centre, and we were not told about it. You will see that we were mighty close to exposing this dimension of the BIGGEST SCANDAL IN WORLD HISTORY: Archive: 4th October to 11th November 2007.

• It is understood that we weren’t informed, in part, because of fears that exposure would have triggered, for instance, the destruction of files and evidence: although the real reason we weren’t told, we surmise, was that IT WAS STILL THE INTENTION TO COVER UP THE FACT THAT THE UNITED STATES HAS BEEN FINANCING AL-QAEDA. Well, now THE TRUTH IS BEING TOLD.

• Let the whole world know that the US criminals who pontificate the most loudly about terrorism are those who are financing it. This was always suspected. Now the whole world knows it.

• NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

PREFACE TO THIS REPORT
In the following report, we have concentrated on intelligence and interpretations based on our own research and which we can vouch for, and have largely ignored the cacophony of conflicting, angry, ‘Black’ and other propaganda that has swirled around the Internet since Barack Obama became the President-Elect of the United States. Our reasoning here can be summarised as follows:

• Whatever anyone says or believes, a decisive DISCONTINUITY has finally materialised. A discontinuity presupposes that all previous assumptions and relationships are either in flux, changing, or subject to change brought about by a rearrangement of the ‘correlation of forces’.

• In the above context, the central fact of importance is that the United States, and therefore the Rest of the World, have finally climbed out of the frying pan.

• Specifically, the United States and the Rest of the World are therefore hovering in mid-air. It is premature to be certain that we will all proceed to jump into the fire, because we are as yet still suspended in mid-air between the frying pan and the fire.

• Equipped with this mindset, we must add that, for the purposes of this report ONLY, we are accordingly AGNOSTIC with reference to the swirling ‘Black’ propaganda against Obama, the Clintons and everyone else on the miserable American political scene which is (see below) manipulated by the controlling Intelligence Power. Of course we have strong views on all the issues that have been and continue to be raised in this context: and in this report we specifically identify, for instance, Mrs Clinton as a financier of terrorism. But none of these issues have ANY relevance to the crucial issue that the whole world faces, which is:

• The absolute paramount necessity for the completion of the wholesale Settlements payouts and for the implementation of the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme, which will refund the US and European (etc) banks and will deliver on-the-books liquidity throughout the system within a matter of months. The Settlements payouts will finance the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme.

• Belated resistance to the Settlements (see below) reflects rearguard operations in the face of the reality that unavoidable repatriation threatens those forced to repatriate, with latent criminal proceedings and probable jail for having fraudulent assets on (or ‘under’) their books.

In short, we are not concerned, for the purposes of THIS report, with whether President-Elect Obama’s belief that following Abraham Lincoln’s technique of placing his enemies at the centre of his government is well-founded (which it may well be), with who is of course blackmailing whom (as is known to be the case), with whether a birth certificate was or was not registered in Timbuctoo, with the reappearance of Clinton retreads on the stage, and with all the other murky side-issues that have been raised by anxious observers, protagonists, ‘Black’ propagandists, controlled agents of influence, and others, since Mr Obama was elected.

And the reason we are not concerned HERE with such issues is that IF THE SETTLEMENTS ARE NOT FINALISED, all these people who are shouting at cross-purposes will eventually fall silent because the United States and Britain (the ‘Main Enemy’) will collapse into a DEPRESSION, on the brink of which both economies stand ‘as we speak’.

Therefore, we do not have the luxury to waste time ventilating about these innumerable issues, important though some of them certainly are; since if the Settlements are not completed in short order, the economic and financial systems will collapse under the weight of nearly $700 trillion sitting on the roof, which is on the verge of collapsing into the basement.

In other words, it’s a matter of the proper priorities, and avoiding being diverted by deliberately contrived redirection and agitation and propaganda operations which are intended to OBFUSCATE the prevailing situation in general, and the extremely grave predicament in which ALL the financial criminals find themselves, in particular.

And right now, there is only one priority, if the whole world is to be saved in time from absolute catastrophe: completing the Settlement payouts and breaking all resistance to this process. In the United States and Europe, ‘forces’ are moving around, even with guns, to procure the necessary outcome (intelligence received on Monday 1st December 2008).

This report brings what we have been able to establish on the Settlements dimension of the world crisis, up to date. We would, however, add that we found it somewhat distasteful that, after eight years of rightly excoriating the Bush-Clinton Crime Dynasty and the immense and lasting damage inflicted on the world under the criminal Bush II-Cheney Administration, guns were immediately swivelled round and opened fire on the President-Elect.

It would appear that no matter who the Intelligence Power selects (as it always does) to serve in the White House, they will always receive the same treatment. However the source of the US malaise is that the Intelligence Power, which appoints its agents to the top posts, is in control, out of control and needs to be brought under control: so until that happens, nothing fundamental is ever going to change, and the revolutionary United States will continue sliding into the abyss.

• WARNING: What follows has been developed from our own, not secondary, sources. We fully acknowledge that Obama MAY not measure up to expectations, or worse, and that his ‘Abraham Lincoln’ rationalisation for appointing Mrs Clinton, subject to approval by the new Senate, may turn out to be unsound and that what is really happening is a rearranging of the Titanic’s deck chairs on the assumption of corrupt ‘business as usual’.

• But the evidence assembled below suggests otherwise, if you can temporarily suspend your perfectly reasonable disgust, which we share, at the appointments of Queen Melusina to the State Department and Timothy Geithner to the US Treasury.

CIA BRIEFED OBAMA IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING HIS VICTORY
Shortly after John McCain conceded the election, which he appears to have ‘thrown’ inter alia by selecting the bimbo operative handled by her husband, Governor Sarah Palin of Alaska, Mr Barack Obama was informed that he would be briefed at the earliest possible moment by the intelligence community. This is extremely unusual, if not unprecedented.

• Mr Obama has been receiving daily CIA briefings ever since.

It is understood that the first briefing took place the day after the election. Since then-Senator Obama had been a junior Senator, he had not been informed about the financial corruption with which a number of his fellow Senators were involved up to their necks. He had been in the Senate for four years, but for almost two of these years he had often been absent on the campaign trail.

ILLEGAL INTERFERENCE BY U.S. AIR FORCE PERSONNEL
Ahead of the election, Barack Obama had been approached by US Air Force personnel, and asked to step down. It is believed that an attempt to bribe him to do so was also made. The US Air Force is heavily indoctrinated, while supporters of the Constitution holding high-level Air Force posts were removed earlier in 2008, leaving key people in charge who are corrupt and involved in the financial fraud and thefts. Interference by armed forces personnel in the civilian political process (albeit that it is manipulated and controlled by the Intelligence Power: see below) is strictly prohibited by the Universal Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and of course as a constitutional expert, Barack Obama immediately told the Air Force representatives to ‘get lost’. He will presumably also have made a note of their identities so that their illegal behaviour catches up with them later.

Following our report on 31st October that the corrupted former British Prime Minister Tony Blair had ‘rolled over’ on all the familiar highest-level criminalists and their institutional and state co-conspirators, from Bush 41 and 43, the Clintons and the Pope, to Chancellor Merkel, Deutsche Bank and elements of the Hungarian Government (always secretly aligned with the STASI/DVD), it had become imperative to divulge to the new President-elect what had been going on behind the scenes in the darkness.

We understand that Blair’s testimony has now thrown so many grenades into the blazing furnace that explosions are going off in all directions, causing the previously asbestos-clad rats to rush around all over the place inside the furnace trying to escape the heat and flames before they are all engulfed by them. This is a late factor that has briefly ‘delayed’ resolution of the Settlements. It has had this effect because the Blair capitulation has CHANGED EVERYTHING for the criminalists, in that their bluff has been called and THESE RATS cannot now escape.

• SERVES THEM RIGHT FOR AGAIN ABUSING THE GENEROSITY OF THEIR ‘CLOSEST ALLY’.

Especially given Blair’s revelations of the relevant sensitive issues, in which he shopped all the main financial criminals and his fellow highest-level co-conspirators and accessories to the fact of these immense crimes, the US intelligence authorities had been left with no choice in the matter, since they had not been in the driving seat for many months (see below) and risked very severe consequences should they themselves withhold crucial information about the corruption, from the President-elect. The ‘sensible’ decision was therefore taken to brief Barack Obama at the earliest opportunity. We are advised that he received what he was told with shock and contempt.

OBAMA ALSO SHOCKED TO FIND THAT BIDEN KNEW ALL ABOUT IT
Of particular concern, we understand, to President-Elect Obama was his realisation that his Vice-Presidential colleague, Mr Biden, knew all about the financial corruption (let us leave the matter there) and so, by definition, may have committed an offence under the Misprision of Felony Statute (1), at the very least, and will, on further investigation, have been a co-conspirator to some degree or another. This realisation explains why Biden was subsequently described as being ‘unhappy’ with the situation in which he now found himself. Could it be that Biden, to put the worst possible construction on the matter, may have expected his future boss to succumb to the bribery pressure that the corrupt incumbent in the White House would be likely to impose upon him?

The Editor’s original notes on information received at 8.20pm UK time on 6th November include a reference to indications that Senator Obama was first informed to a limited extent that a gigantic scandal with explosive implications was out of control back in May 2008, but that he was not given pertinent details at the time. Our notes state that Mr Obama ‘only started to find out after he was elected and received private security briefings by CIA agents. He’s starting to find out how many figures were involved, and he’s saying [expletive deleted]. His meetings started yesterday and continued all day today. He’s furious and also very angry at Biden. It has never been known for a President-Elect to receive CIA briefings immediately his election has been confirmed’. Our sources elaborated that ‘Obama’s meeting with his financial team. He learned this stuff and was horrified’.

Briefing Obama on this occasion must in any case have been a distrinctly painful experience for the compromised General Hayden, Director of Central Intelligence, and also for John Negroponte, the former Director of National Intelligence (see below), if he too had to attend the briefing, since the CIA and its numerous appendages and so-called subsidiary agencies are notoriously disruptive revolutionary criminal enterprises that have themselves been fully engaged in spearheading the fraudulent finance dimension of the World Revolution.

VOLCKER, A TRUSTEE, HAS SOUND REASONS FOR HIS ADVICE
In this connection, the key member of Obama’s financial advisory team, and a powerful adviser during the later stages of Mr Obama’s campaign, is Paul Volcker, the former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, and a man who, whatever critics may say, is held in the highest esteem internationally. As a ‘righteous Jew’, this expert is believed to abhor all the financial corruption, although he IS a Trustee for ‘the Settlements’.

• Over 1,000 Trustees were originally appointed, all of them connected in some way to Bush Sr.

This does not necessarily mean that all Trustees are or will have been compromised (although Bush Sr. always seeks to double-cross, intimidate and/or compromise those with whom he has dealings). In the present context, what it means is that Volcker himself, as a Trustee, needed to be paid, so that he, too, could fulfil his obligations as a Trustee towards other parties. That has been a very significant fact in the overall quadrilateral equation.

• On 27th November, Reuters reported that Mr Obama had picked Volcker to head a special office to advise on economic and financial recovery.

SATELLITE-LINKED TRADING AND ECONOMIC TERRORISM
One dimension of this pointless activity has typically included the distribution inside the United States of special satellite-linked ‘grey screen’ trading equipment enabling selected operatives to conduct secret off-balance sheet and therefore illegal ‘terrorist’ trading from their own homes, often ostensibly unknown even to their own family members. This activity has been very severely curtailed or stopped altogether, as all transactions and funds associated with this trading is tracked 24/7. Many operatives engaged in these illegal trades have had to close down their operations, have gone to ground, or have been arrested.

When tackled about these activities in the past, members of such US operatives’ families, who ‘sort of’ knew what was going on, have typically tended to fall back on the words ‘national security’ when asked direct questions about what such unusual satellite trading equipment was being used for – this phrase being favoured as cover for the reality that the trading equipment had been given to the operatives by the CIA et al. to enable them to conduct illegal, off-balance sheet, untaxed, secret fraudulent finance counterparty trading operations undetected, as such transactions are or were of course all unaudited and subject to no checks and balances at all.

• By their involvement in such hidden fraudulent financial trading activity, the secret Agency-linked traders, located all over the United States, were engaged in economic terrorism and are accordingly vulnerable, as the purge widens, to being arrested and indicted for such crimes.

Of course even family members who knew what their spouses were up to may genuinely have assumed that their secret trading activities were covered by the National Security Act of 1947 et seq.; but since most of these people knew perfectly well what was going on, their toleration of such corrosive activities, amounting to economic terrorism, which have created such growing havoc by accelerating the rate of expansion of the overhang of unrealisable outstanding fiat obligations, represents a prima facie breach of the Misprision of Felony Statute.

DOUBLE-MINDED CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE SERVES DVD’S AGENDA
The CIA’s fraudulent finance operations have been systematically destroying the global financial economy in accordance with the bribery-oriented blueprint developed by George Bush Sr. and the corrupt Dr Alan Greenspan for Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD), Dachau, the heirs of the Nazi Abwehr originally directed from Oklahoma City by the late Admiral Canaris, who operated under the assumed name of Samuel Randall Pittman until he fell ill in 1974, when his place was occupied on a temporary basis by the triple or quadruple agent Dr Henry Kissinger, who has never managed to discard his hideously guttural German accent, which no American ever seems to have questioned!

Kissinger persuaded President Gerald Ford (a.k.a. the pornographer Leslie Lynch King Jr.) to fire William Colby (later ‘suicided’ during a ‘canoe trip’ on the Potomac) and to replace him as DCI with George Henry Walker Bush Sr. (Scherff), a long-time Abwehr/DVD asset and CIA agent implicated in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, in a manoeuvre whereby the DVD came to control the Central Intelligence Agency totally (rather than partially through the notorious earlier postwar penetrations). In April 2008, a ‘connected’ US visitor who appeared at our London office without an appointment on Good Friday, volunteered that our DVD analysis ‘is 100% correct’.

LONG-RANGE PAN-GERMAN REVANCHIST STRATEGIC DECEPTION
The pan-German ‘Black’ DVD Nazi strategic deception Continuum is motivated by a hatred of the ‘Anglo-Saxons’ for having supposedly ‘won’ two World Wars as a consequence of which Germany was virtually destroyed. In 1941-42, the Nazis set up a German Geopolitical Centre in Madrid, which became a haven for Gestapo officers, who occupied all the main hotels there for many years. In the early 1950s, the Allies intercepted a document that they labelled the ‘Madrid Circular Letter’ which spelled out pan-German long-range plans to reverse the outcomes of the two World Wars.

This document elaborated on Nazi policy papers captured by the Allies at the end of the Second Illuminati War, one of which boasted that ‘we shall build the Thousand-Year Reich on the Ruins of the United States’, as explained in great detail in the Editor’s book ‘The New Underworld Order’.

The ‘Madrid Circular Letter’ claimed that ‘für uns ist der Krieg niemals vorbei’ (for us, the war never ended). But the West in general , and the United States in particular, complacently assumed that, having personalised the enemy in the format of the hate-figure of Hitler, that operative’s demise represented the end of the Nazi menace. This view was catastrophically mistaken.

For, as described in the Editor’s book and widely elaborated elsewhere, the Nazi repression and intelligence chief in the Soviet Union, General Reinhard Gehlen, not only managed to persuade a willing US political and intelligence class that Mr Stalin was preparing to invade Western Europe (whereas in reality Josef Djiugashivili-Kochba had only one and a half mechanised divisions, the rest being either decimated or still horse-drawn, while his repression cadres were bogged down with imposing their control over the newly-annexed satellites), but also over time procured the mass penetration of the US intelligence community and other US structures with ‘former’ Nazi operatives and scientists, finally backing the reconstituted European elements of his former networks into the Germany-based US intelligence structures themselves (CIA-1, Frankfurt).

WORLD NOW ENGULFED IN A CHAOTIC INTELLIGENCE WAR
All intelligence organisations today are at war within themselves, as all have been penetrated by foreign powers and domestic enemies, as a consequence of which no intelligence operative can ever trust any of his or her colleagues and must live with the knowledge that he or she is liable to be deceived, double-crossed or entrapped without warning at any stage of a given operation.

The upshot is that the whole world is now engulfed in a ruthless, no-holds-barred, long-running and now red-hot intelligence war over money, which is actually destroying all money and asset values on a scale with no historical precedent. We did predict this outcome in our reports dated 2nd September 2006, and in reports posted, for instance, on 18th and 27th July 2007 [see Archive].

As indicated earlier, the intelligence war over money had been raging largely below the radar, with periodic eruptions, certainly since the Second World War. But given the terrible intransigence of the organised intelligence community-linked criminals who hijacked the White House and the US Treasury under the Bush and Clinton Crime Families, we need hardly be surprised that many unruly elements of the darkness are taking matters into their own hands, seeking to ignite flashpoints in the cynical expectation of being able to foment wars and rumours of wars which can subsequently be exploited to cover up their financial thefts and fraudulent operations. For instance, the Bombay atrocities could well have been associated with the Bush-linked ‘Black’ forces’ fury that the Indian authorities may have ‘ceased to cooperate’ over $2.0 trillion that was illegally transferred, you will recall, to UBS New Delhi, in the course of 2007, when the criminal financial operations were at their peak, before our exposures had started to bring the perpetrators to book.

Amazingly, however, these penetrated and internally warring intelligence communities ‘rely upon’ the ‘Rule of Law’ as a back-stop, even though some of them (headed by the CIA) treat the ‘Rule of Law’ with absolute contempt and consider that they have an open-ended license to break the law, the only rule being ‘you are on you’re own if you get caught’.

CRIMINAL INTELLIGENCE INCOMPATIBLE WITH GOOD GOVERNANCE
Self-evidently, the existence of criminal enterprise intelligence communities as evil as the CIA and its ‘subsidiaries’ is quite incompatible with good governance and indeed with national and external stability and wellbeing. Moreover, as we have explained both electronically and in several of our publications, the aggressive Intelligence Power acquires hegemony over the other two sides of the power triangle, the Military Power and ‘The Party’ which, in the geomasonic control model, is split between two main factions (Thesis, Republicans and the Conservative Party; Antithesis, the US Democrats or the Labour Party). The Intelligence Power typically develops its odious status as the immense, arrogant ‘State within the State’ by exploiting its power of penetration and its ‘licence to deceive’, so that it places its own operatives inside the Military Power and The Party. In both Britain and the United States, the Intelligence Power selects and prepares candidates for the highest offices from among the ranks of its operatives or assets – giving rise to our aphorisms:

• ‘The Intelligence Power is in control, out of control
and needs to be brought under control’; and:

• ‘It is neither here nor there which faction of The Party wins elections,
because the Intelligence Power always wins’.

In the parallel and almost identical (covert) Soviet model, exactly the same phenomenon applies. This central reality (which few Americans yet seem to grasp) does not detract from the fact that the two wings of The Party are or can be at almost perpetual loggerheads with each other, and bitter enemies at all times. After all, enmity, hatred, conflict, antagonism, lying, deceit, reprobate abuse, paedophilia, double-crossing, bearing false witness and all the other familiar ‘Black’ behaviour that is characteristic of the darkness are presupposed, given that Evil Spirit is in charge here.

Perpetual conflict and tension (which the controlled operatives Trotsky and Mao Tse-Tung took to the extreme of advocating and promoting ‘Permanent Revolution’) are the necessary prerequisites for ‘fruitful’ manipulation of the dialectical process (Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis), with successive dialectical cycles occurring until (in theory) such time as the pre-intended ‘Synthesis’ is achieved.

But of course, as all this is the work of the Devil, that never actually happens: hence the use of the word ‘Revolution’, meaning going round and round in circles.

The word ‘reactionary’ was developed as a label to be used against all who oppose going round and round in circles, with the completely illogical connotation that those who prefer standing still and not getting dizzy by going round in circles, are boring stick-in-the muds who can be dismissed as beyond their sell-by-date. The use of twisted semantics is an important revolutionary tool.

TABLES DECISIVELY TURNED AGAINST PARTS OF THE OCTOPUS
Anyway, we diverge (on purpose), don’t we?

Actually, a modicum of scene-setting has been considered necessary, in particular so as to address two rearguard agitprop campaigns that erupted the moment John McCain conceded the election, leaving Barack Obama as the President-elect. McCain is reported to have decided to ‘throw’ the election in part because, finally, he had become sick of the endless corruption, and preferred the prospect of retiring to a status of ‘elder statesman’, not least so that the far-reaching purge that we identified and predicted in our report dated 6th November 2007, would not be liable to be focused in his direction. In that report, we published paragraphs headed as follows:

• ‘Why the overdue purge, once started, will now continue’;

• ‘The bad apples will continue to be purged’; and:

• ‘The American people will suffer because they cannot get on top of
the most dangerous pack of deceiving and thieving wolves in the world’.

DEFEATED ‘GERMAN FACTION’ FURIOUS THAT IT HAS BEEN COMPREHENSIVELY THRASHED
The good news, as will be explained below, is that, at long last, the tables are now being decisively turned against these ruthless criminal operatives – a fact which has so far escaped the attention of most Americans, and has certainly not been well understood by many correspondents in the United States impatient for progress but lacking adequate information, who appear to imagine that these evils can somehow be remedied overnight, let alone by various frantic authors of certain hysterical electronic postings which have their known origins in last-ditch US counterintgelligence agitprop operations separately designed to destabilise the President-elect, and the British.

Both these sewage outflows of disinformation have been driven by the following realities:

• THE UNITED STATES IS NOW RANK BUST. It is IN HOCK to the European powers. This is NOT a result of deliberate entrapment by these European powers: it is a consequence of the unfortunate failure of the American people to clean up their country’s mess, which is to say, their failure to find a mechanism for ridding the political structures of the corrupt organised criminals who hijacked the US political process many years ago for illegal and corrupt self-enrichment purposes.

• No-one in Europe blames the American people for this failure: it is hardly THEIR fault that such a ruthless gang of criminals and thieves took over their Government and turned it into a murderous money-making machine for their own purposes, to the detriment of the American people and of the whole world, leaving the United States with a degraded reputation as a pariah state.

• After all, the United States ‘replaced’ Britain as the leading power in the world, and expects the Rest of the World to hold its currency, as prescribed under the Bretton Woods system, which ALSO laid down that the second, offsetting, world currency shall remain the pound sterling (which is why, contrary to what the President of the European Commission is now claiming, Britain is NOT about to dump the pound and substitute the European Collective Currency, which is backed by nothing, has no Treasury and lacks any Government in the true sense).

• Contrary to the bitter propaganda motivated precisely by the fact that the DVD-linked criminals holding the highest offices have now been COMPREHENSIVELY DEFEATED, a nasty rearguard ‘Blacking’ operation (which no-one other than the less well-informed (through no fault of their own) takes seriously) has suggested that the Brits have got the ‘upper hand’: whereas what has really happened is that the thefts of The Queen’s gold and attempted thefts of Her Majesty’s loan funds, and other financial crimes against the Sovereign arising from the surreptitious instalment by Bush-Blair of fraudulent finance operations involving Deutsche Bank and the Vatican Bank run through Coutts Bank as clearing house, have been ‘put in order’.

At the same time, since the financial crimes were committed abroad, especially in Britain, British law enforcement, intelligence and justice have been deployed to procure the intended outcome against the intransigent intentions of the scorched and defeated criminalists and some of their intelligence and banking associates, and latterly now of Gordon Brown [see below].

• The pan-German Fifth Column headed by the DVD’s Bush Sr. (Scherff) have now been thrashed so badly, and repeatedly thrashed so badly, that they are bleeding and screaming and bellyaching as they wallow in the mess resulting from their newly exposed criminality, alike a spoilt child who has been disciplined and refuses to submit to any discipline whatsoever.

• There is nothing (apart from organising retaliatory flashpoint atrocities such as shipping trigger-happy mind-controlled False Flag terrorist cadres by boat into Bombay and ordering them through compartmentalised cutouts to indulge in a sadistic bloodbath of Jews and other foreigners) that they can now do about this massive defeat that they are experiencing.

DIVERSIONARY PURPOSE OF PANICKY ANTI-BRITISH AGITPROP
The purpose of the crude attacks on the British that we have been seeing of late is therefore to reverse the truth – which is that the criminal financial operations, equating to financing terrorism, were and have continued to be recklessly perpetrated by these arrogant US criminal operatives against The Queen (see below) and Britain generally, as well as against certain other key European countries. Those controlled diversion and redirection outlets that have been pointing the finger at the British have been ordered or encouraged to do so by their handlers, as part of a crude, belated and futile rearguard response to the stark and decisive defeat these criminals have suffered and are facing, to try to obfuscate what has been going on, and to salvage the wounded pride of those agents of influence who have been unwilling to comprehend that the criminality originated at home but had to be exported to Europe and beyond because the relevant financial fraud operations were and remain illegal under, inter alia, the US securities laws.

See also, appended at the foot of this report, the list of US Statutes that the American perpetrators flouted, and for which many of their number, including representatives of the criminal enterprises, will certainly be called to account as a consequence of crucial US judicial processes which remain empanelled and are intensively engaged in comprehensive reviews of the epidemic of Bush-linked fraudulent finance highlighted by these exposures. These processes will impinge upon the Senate confirmation hearings, which will need to consider the criminal activities of certain nominees.

Recall that nine aircraft were commandeered, as reported in our posting dated 6th November 2007, to transport thousands of arrested US bankers to European centres, especially Britain, where they were taken into custody under the European anti-terrorism legislation. As we reported recently, the bankers and others, including some of their lawyers, were duly jailed for periods of 25 years, with the aggregate number of such prisoners languishing in British and European jails now believed to exceed 10,000. Further information about what they were up to, is contained in the present report.

BUSH TRIED TO BRIBE OBAMA WHEN HE VISITED THE WHITE HOUSE
When considering what follows, it will be as well to remind ourselves that what is presented for public consumption may of course diverge 100% from the reality. Hence widely distributed press photographs of President-elect Obama and his wife flanked by a mean-looking President George W. Bush who has made a complete mess of his Presidency, and his wife Laura with her stiff false smile, at the White House on Monday 10th November, were intended to imply that the outgoing team had been engaged in a polite encounter, smoothing the way for the President-Elect to assume power – and displaying before the whole world that the United States transfers power without acrimony.

Nothing could have been further from the truth about what happened on Monday 10th November, when Mr and Mrs Obama appeared at the White House on schedule. For according to our special sources, what then happened was that Mr Obama was immediately subjected to the Bush bribery routine. Specifically, heavy pressure was exerted on him to meet the wishes of the Bush-Cheney criminalist gangsters in exchange for a huge payout, the proportions of which have not yet been specified (whereas it is known that a huge volume of gold was paid to a previous contender for high office on an earlier occasion).

Reflecting his innate strength of character, his standards of belief and conduct and his extensive knowledge as a former professor of constitutional law in Chicago, Barack Obama reacted with an outright rejection, along the lines inter alia of ‘you must be joking’ – whereupon there really wasn’t much more to be said. The Bush Crime Family had finally ‘blown it’.

These criminal operatives behaved as they have behaved all along – assuming that the Cheney-favoured post-war neo-Nazi-originated power-building technique of bribery, with its corollary of blackmail and control, would ‘work’, as had been the case in innumerable instances before. They took the desperate risk that their offer might be turned down, without stopping to think what the consequences of such an ‘inconceivable’ rejection would be likely to be.

BUSH WARNED: ‘DO NOT TOUCH OBAMA, OR ELSE…’
In order to register the momentous consequences of this encounter on 10th November 2008, a concomitant development must be reported here. Following Obama’s election victory, George Bush Sr. and associates, including his cokehead son, were informed by powerful but unspecified parties that if they proceeded with their project to have President-Elect Barack Obama ‘removed’ – an intention that had been discovered to be a reality, as opposed to wishful thinking – all those concerned would immediately be liquidated without further ado.

• Now it will be recalled that we have previously reported that Bush Sr., the Personification of Evil, has previously been warned that he would be shot dead on sight – a warning he has ignored.

• In 2004, when confronted by representatives of the Joint Chiefs of Staff about his open-ended criminal operations at home and abroad, the charming Mr George Bush Sr. is reported to have shouted: ‘Go take a flying [expletive deleted] at the moon’. [Verbatim].

But this time, the force of the warning appears to have penetrated one ear of the relevant skulls without immediately shooting out of the other one – as usually happens, given that there is not a lot in between. It was borne in upon these crooks that the Intelligence Power had long since made up its mind WHO was to be President of the United States, and that the US Intelligence Power was supported by the Military Power as well – not least, at this late stage, because the Military Power knows what the consequences in terms of domestic revolutionary social unrest would be liable to be, should anything happen to the new President-Elect.

BLAIR SUBJECTED TO INTENSE INTERROGATION IN THE UNITED STATES
In other words, the temperature immediately following the election could be described as close to boiling point, especially as the former British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, had crossed the Atlantic for a second time, to appear in Washington DC for further questioning.

• This followed his capitulation two weeks or so earlier when, faced with a summons to appear, as ordered by Speaker Michael Martin, before a House of Commons Committee ostensibly called upon to investigate the 11-year-old matter of Blair’s exemption of the Formula One motor racing sector from a ban on tobacco advertising shortly after Blair had seen its controller, the dubious Monaco-based Bernie Ecclestone in 1997, Blair had decided to ‘roll over’ on all the primary participants in this fraudulent finance epidemic, as we reported here on 31st October 2008.

As explained in that report, UK Parliamentary committees will only address issues that are before the relevant House and concern its specific business; so the intention had been to entrap Blair with evidence based inter alia (but not exclusively) upon evidence that surfaced following the raids on the ‘safety lock boxes’ by 300 armed Metropolitan Police masterminded by Assistant Deputy Metropolitan Police Commissioner John Yates on 2nd June 2008 – an absolutely crucial, decisive development in the process of unravelling the criminal operations of the Octopus.

BLAIR AND BUSH SET LONDON UP AS FRAUDULENT FINANCE PLATFORM
On Sunday 2nd November, Blair had been obliged to rush to the United States for the first time since he had ‘rolled over’, inter alia to sign certain key release documents in the presence, it is believed, of two Supreme Court Black Robes. With such information surfacing, it now began to emerge that Blair had been much more deeply involved (see below) with the fraudulent finance operations than may have previously been understood. For on 3rd November, we were able to establish from two reliable sources that:

• Following 9/11 (when a large portfolio of contracts had perished given that the offices and 652 personnel of Cantor Fitzgerald, the British-based money brokerage firm, had been destroyed when the Twin Towers were blown up), and certainly by May 2003 when the Editor of this service started to become aware of this, former President Bush 41 and Prime Minister Blair had been instrumental in procuring the exploitation of London as the main ‘platform’ for a new wave of fraudulent finance operations inter alia using stolen assets as base. The Bank of England provided secret offshore account facilities for this purpose as well, and has been directly involved in these activities: hence (a) the arrest of the former Governor, Eddie (Lord) George, in July 2007, and (b) the tension that is evident on the face of the current Governor of the Bank of England, Mervyn King.

• Specifically, Coutts Bank, ‘The Queen’s bank’, was selected to serve as clearing house (money laundry) to move secret fiat funds through to Deutsche Bank, the DVD’s ‘house bank’, and on to the Vatican Bank, by now directed by the former President of the Bundesbank, Herr Dr Hans Tietmeyer, under the control of the German Pope Ratzinger. At Coutts, there is or was a lock box containing substantial usurped collateral assets which may have underpinned at least part of this operation.

• Nefarious intentions here included a blatant attempt to compromise Her Majesty the Queen by exploiting the services of this institution, Coutts Bank, known to have connections with Royalty.

• More generally, cover for this illicit financial activity was to be provided, crudely put, by The Queen, unknown to her, and the Pope simultaneously.

• Incredibly, the conduit ‘enabling’ aspects of this criminalist assault to be perpetrated is reported to us to have been a certain Bernie Ecclestone, whose Formula One (cover?) operations are based in Monaco which is the CIA’s main European money-laundering centre.

Formula One. which may be a massively ‘lucrative’ money laundry (serving the necessary ‘project’ purpose applicable to all such finance), is known to have very extensive German dimensions and is ultimately controlled by Max Mosely, son of Sir Oswald Mosley, head of the British Fascist Party and a Mussolini symathiser, and the supremely snobby socialite Diana Mitford, who had been a personal friend of Adolf Hitler-Schickelgrüber and a Nazi sympathiser (both of whom were interned by the British Government at the outbreak of the Second Illuminati War).

Hence the significance of Speaker Michael Martin’s order for Blair to appear before a House of Commons investigating committee over the 1997 ‘Ecclestone affair’.

• There is also an extraordinary separate ‘Ecclestone’ dimension which would appear to have represented an early attempt by UK authorities to bear false witness against the Editor of this service in order to discourage him from pursuing these enquiries (an operation which of course had the opposite effect). This dimension is elaborated on pages F-03 et seq. of the new issue of International Currency Review [Volume 34, Number 1], published at the end of November 2008, excerpts from which are posted below in the Appendix.

On 21st November it was extensively publicised that the diminutive (5ft 4ins) Ecclestone is to be divorced by his extremely tall Croatian wife (and DVD handler?) Slavica, who could be in line for a record-breaking divorce settlement, as many of his assets are reported to be lodged in her name. The timing of this development is ‘curious’, to say the last.

POWERS OF ATTORNEY TO INVESTIGATE COUTTS LOCK BOX
In March 2005, the Editor of this service was granted a strictly limited (at his request) Power of Attorney empowering him to investigate and report on the existence of certain assets held at Coutts Bank. The Editor attended the offices of Attorney Steven Goodwin in Richmond, VA, from where a conference call to Coutts Bank was arranged at which Mr Goodwin was to inform the bank that he would be attending at Coutts with the Editor in this connection.

The phone call was initially directed to a Mrs Burgess, a contact previously established by the Editor; but when put through, it was diverted to a Mr Robertson, a Scot presumably installed by Royal Bank of Scotland, of which Coutts, via Natwest Bank, was by now a subsidiary (such hasty banking mergers facilitate the hiding of irregular transactions).

• This Mr Robertson did his best to affect total ignorance of the assets in question. At the end of the said conference call, the Editor surprised Mr Robertson by interjecting to say that as Editor of International Currency Review, he was conducting an extensive investigation into missing and hijacked finances worldwide, which was one reason why he would be attending at Coutts Bank accompanied by Mr Goodwin, as had been tentatively arranged for early April 2005.

On 3rd April [see Figure 23, International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 3 & 4, page F-124, facsimile], Mr Goodwin wrote to Robertson at Coutts Bank’s central London address, 440 Strand, London WC2R 0QS, demanding information about certain corporate accounts and noting (by way of illustration) as follows:

‘Enclosed herewith please find a specific Power of Attorney granting me access to this [specified] information. I would specifically refer you to an account in the name of Pacific Victory S.A., having an account number of Z 63 66 76. It is my understanding that on or about April 26 1999, a significant transfer was made into this account at your bank from Standard Chartered Bank, and [that] this transaction was handled by bank officer J. D. Fleming, and/or John S. de C. Firth, Vice-President’.

‘Please contact me immediately regarding these accounts. I look forward to your prompt response’.

CONFERENCE CALL IGNITED RED LIGHTS EVERYWHERE
In the light of the fact that Coutts Bank had been selected, we now know, as the clearing house for the illicit transactions referenced above, you can imagine that the reaction of US and international eavesdroppers to that conference call will have been, shall we say, one of considerable alarm – especially, one would imagine, at Fort Meade, GCHQ Cheltenham, and at the DVD’s listening post near Munich. How was it possible that a mere investigative journalist was so rapidly onto the tail of this newly relaunched fraudulent finance undercover money-laundering operation sponsored by George Bush Sr. and the British Prime Minister, Tony Blair?

At that stage of the investigations, the Editor had been advised that the intention was to repatriate all the funds deposited outside the United States and illegally deployed (both by the institutions and by corrupt US operatives) as collateral following the ‘takedown’ of the Soviet Union, with the collaboration of the bribed Gorbachëv and of the key GRU operative Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin.

But not long after this telephone conference call, a clandestine ‘switch’ took place, and the Editor was in due course informed that $4.5 trillion, by way of a settlement, had been sent over from the People’s Bank of China in May 2006 (after the no-longer-dead Howie Kwong Kok’s signature for the release had been obtained). These funds were supposed to have been made available to finance what is now called the G-7-Approved Refunding Programme, with effect from June 2006: instead of which, the US Treasury Secretary-designate, Henry M. Paulson, secretly signed a certain contract alienating the funds on 20th or 21st June 2006.

• Since this was of course all done behind closed doors, the Editor was not informed and we embarked, as requested, upon what became our globally disseminated ‘Wantagate’ quest for fulfilment of the delivery, which never materialised.

• It now appears that we were encouraged to do precisely this (which was why the Editor was ‘left alone’) as COVER for the switch and diversion of the funds that had already taken place.

GROSS ERROR OF JUDGEMENT BY U.S. COUNTERINTELLIGENCE
If so, that was a catastrophic mistake on the part of the US intelligence community’s cack-handed strategists. OK, we were deceived at the time, and for a long time. But the deception led directly to the global crisis that is now unfolding, because in pursuing the whereabouts and handling of the $4.5 trillion, we unexpectedly exposed successive layers of US official and banking sector duplicity and corruption, which led in December 2006 to Paulson’s arrest in Germany, and thereafter to the successive peeling away of the onion of gross deceit and fraudulent finance which precipitated what became known as the ‘sub-prime crisis’ – a ‘slide’ imposed by US counterintelligence on the situation, designed to prevent the ‘mainstream’ media from investigating further.

As this catastrophe expanded, we specifically warned that the outcome would be a ‘train wreck’: see, for instance, our reports dated 18th July 2007 (‘Touch and Go’); 27th July 2008 (‘Global Train Wreck’); 10th August 2007 (‘And so it came to pass: (Subtitled) Finally, years of financial fraud start unravelling’); 30th August 2007 (‘The ‘sub-prime’ link: How Wantagate unravelled the ‘sub-prime’ scams’) [see Archive], not to mention innumerable other posted warnings along the same lines, starting with our earliest prediction of what would happen in the financial and the ‘real’ worlds if Paulson, the US Treasury Secretary, continued with his corrupt practices (2nd September 2006).

In other words, the highest-level perpetrators of these fraudulent financial manoeuvres, headed by the Bush and Clinton Crime Families, Paulson, Cheney, Greenspan and the rest, PERSISTED with their illegal, unconstitutional behaviour as economic terrorists, in the face of both our warnings of what their behaviour would lead to, and the rapidly accumulating confirmations that these warnings were soundly based. Even when that was OBVIOUS to all who were not sitting on their brains, they CONTINUED WITH THEIR MANIPULATIONS AND DECEPTION MANOEUVRES.

It is thought that during this period, because the ‘mainstream’, controlled and directed by Cheney, remained fast asleep, the US criminalists assumed complacently that the warnings posted on this website could be safely ignored. But what was also ignored was that the Editor of this service is the longest-serving editor of economic and financial publications in the world.

• We were writing and analysing this stuff when Bush Jr. was evading the draft, and Paulson was still metaphorically speaking in short pants.

BLAIR INFLUENCED BY THE GERMAN MOLE ROY JENKINS
A relevant word here about Tony Blair’s political pedigree. Blair, an intelligence officer, was a protégé of Roy Jenkins, one of the Oxford undergraduates who, with Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon (the joint signatories of the illegal British Treaty of Accession to the European Economic Community in 1972) had been recruited decades earlier by pan-German interests, as exposed in the first report to have been posted on this website (dated 12th October 2005).

Heath, in fact, was the longest-serving mole ever to have been exposed (which occurred, by the way, in 2003). Hence Blair’s geopolitical orientation was influenced by Heath’s fellow traitor Roy Jenkins. Blair was responsible for appointing John Scarlett as head of MI6; and as also reported here, John Scarlett serves the interests of the pan-German agenda (i.e., the Abwehr/DVD), which initiated and controls the European Union Collective, an anti-nation state entrapment instrument, the purpose of which is to defang, collectivise, ‘enronise’ and also entrap its constituent Member States, in accordance with the blueprint specified in the Nazis’ 1941 compendium ‘Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft’ (‘European Economic Community), published by Haude & Spenersche Verlagsbuchhandlung Max Pashke in Berlin in 1943, copies of which may be inspected in the Staatsbibliothek, Berlin, and in the British Library (on request).

• As previously reiterated here, the chapter headings of this Nazi tome are almost identical to the chapter headings of the 1992 Maastricht Treaty, which represented the culmination of this Nazi blueprint for achieving political control and regional hegemony.

MISGUIDED BRITISH IDOLATRY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
The British Establishment’s blind idolatry of our membership of the disastrous and institutionally corrupt European Union Collective is of course a scandal of immense proportions, not least in the prevailing economic and financial context, when the Government’s financial problems could be addressed, as proposed in the preceding report, by diverting all UK payments destined for the European Commission into a suspense account, pending the rectification of the Commission’s fraudulent financing and accounting practices.

Since the Commission’s accounts have been adjudged to be irregular for the past 14 years by the European Court of Auditors, it is beyond scandalous that the British Government still continues to squander more than £50 billion of taxpayers’ funds per year to finance this corrupt and reprobate geopolitical, globalist sink-hole.

• The only reason this idolatry remains intact is that operatives at the highest levels of the British political system, such as Blair and now Brown (see below), are/were compromised.

EMPANELLED INVESTIGATIONS LOOKING INTO WIDE SPECTRUM OF THIS CORRUPTION
Concerning the United States, there is a dimension of the ever-broadening unravelling process that we are prevented by US practice and legal constraints from reviewing.

We refer again to certain empanelled, ongoing judicial processes that have been engaged in comprehensive investigations into multiple US dimensions of the fraudulent finance operations, including the criminal alienation of the original $4.5 trillion, as discussed below, and for instance the Halliburton operations installed inside the Central Intelligence Agency and in the Pentagon which have been systematically defrauding the two structures and the US taxpayer (see report of 26th May 2008: Archive), profiting from the Iraqi and Afghan wars and deaths on a prodigious scale.

• Given these ongoing processes, it seems to us, and others, to be most unlikely that the high-profile perpetrators will escape the devastating consequences of their serial financial crimes.

• The machinery of the Rule of Law grinds slowly, but excessively finely. This all TAKES TIME.

PRESIDENTIAL PARDONS ARE NO USE: CRIMES WERE COMMITTED ABROAD
There has been talk, inevitably, of Presidential pardons, which was what President Bush Jr. was clearly signalling when, immediately ahead of Thanksgiving, he was reported to have conducted a ceremony in the Rose Garden at which he pardoned two turkeys.

• In practice, Presidential pardons will provide perpetrators of these crimes with no protection at all, since the grotesque serial financial crimes in question, including the stealing of The Queen’s gold, from which the Clintons profited (see below), were perpetrated against foreign powers and sovereigns, starting with Her Majesty The Queen.

One can well imagine, therefore, that, as Secretary of State, Mrs Clinton would be liable to receive the frostiest of welcomes in foreign capitals, especially in London, where she might be told in no uncertain terms that she would not be welcome. (On 1st December, The Times of London, globalist Rupert Murdoch’s mouthpiece, perversely said the exact opposite, namely that the appointment of this ‘brilliant woman’ would be enthusiastically welcomed in London, implying either its crass and culpable ignorance of Queen Melusina’s crimes, or an incompetent failure to understand that her CIA husband ‘works for’ DVD chieftain Bush Sr. who has systematically ‘enronised’ both the United States and Britain). How dare this criminal operative purport to tell other countries what to do when she herself should be behind bars for at least the 25-year tariff that lesser (banking) criminals were having to endure due in part to her own open-ended immorality.

• Irrespective of her position, she would certainly be eligible for immediate arrest, incarceration and indictment without further ado: after all, if the current British Prime Minister can be threatened with arrest (see below) by Barack Obama even before he has taken over as President, so can this arrogant Queen Melusina. There are said to be a number of sealed indictments against this woman.

Of course the impact of Bush Jr.’s ludicrous theatrical performance was to reconfirm that this deluded fellow may indeed himself be indistinguishable these days from a terrified turkey – an impression reinforced by the parallel fact that on 24th, 25th and 26th November, President-Elect Obama gave press conferences at which he was universally seen to be ‘behaving presidentially’ – an impression being fostered by no means by accident.

OBAMA ADVISED HE MAY HAVE TO ASSUME POWER EARLY
For Mr Obama has been advised that he must be prepared to assume office early, if necessary – which is to say that there are indications, confirmed by several separate sources to this service, that the prescribed Inauguration Day of 20th January 2008 may be brought forward, or that the new President may have taken office some time in advance of that date. This information has not been accompanied by any elaboration: but it must be obvious that the pressure of events and of ‘the processes’ alluded to above may not allow for the luxury of a transition period of normal duration.

• This, in turn, accounts for the fact that Mr Obama has already assembled the key members of his team for his first term, although we also know, do we not, that all the key people are selected by the Intelligence Power which runs the Government, and its structures, not the other way round. The team has been assembled ‘early’ because the Obama Administration may start early.

Whatever the failing agitpropagandists wanted, the reality is that, in contrast to earlier presidential elections, the outcome in November 2008 was decisive – enabling John McCain to escape from his agony by conceding defeat and making a very generous speech congratulating his opponent at the earliest possible moment. At 8.20pm on 6th November, we were further informed that the current Provost Marshal had retrieved the controversial NESARA (that is, National Economic Security and Recovery Act) documents from Chief Justice John Roberts.

NESARA APPARENTLY REMOVED FROM THE EQUATION
Since the United States now at last possessed (so far as the controlling Intelligence Power was concerned, at any rate, which was ALL THAT MATTERED IN PRACTICE) a constitutionally chosen President-Elect, NESARA was now clearly redundant. It is finished.

• Criminalist President Clinton had signed the legislation, WHICH WOULD ONLY COME INTO EFFECT WHEN ANNOUNCED, in the presence of Navy Seals, who eat Marines for breakfast.

It contained provisions for the reform of the United States’ finances and the removal from office of the President, the Vice President and the Cabinet, and their immediate replacement by an Interim Administration charged with organising elections within six months. NESARA, by the way, explains the original nickname applied to Bush Jr. of ‘Temporary’. It had somehow been assumed that the Clinton legislation, effectively signed under military duress, would be implemented under Bush Jr.

• John Roberts, appointed by Bush Jr. to head the Supreme Court, was briefed to confiscate and ‘sit on’ the NESARA papers, presumably because Bush Jr. saw them as a threat to his rule.

The decisive 2008 election outcome was of course another reason why John McCain conceded so promptly. Given the outcome, NESARA was no longer prospectively ‘needed’, so the Chief Justice could no longer ‘justify’ holding on to the relevant documents, which the current Provost Marshal accordingly ‘confiscated’. President-Elect Barack Obama has since indicated that the authority of the Provost Marshal is to be strengthened under his Presidency, or else has made it plain that the holder of this office has the President-Elect’s full support in the fulfilment of his duties, which, in the prevailing circumstances, amounts to the same thing.

FINALLY, ‘MAINSTREAM’ OUTLETS HINT AT THE REAL CRISIS
On 8th November, CNN came closer than ever before to exposing the institutionalised financial corruption (which, despite everything we have published, has been continuing, although Bush Sr. himself has encountered increasing difficulty in identifying counterparties willing to play financial games with him any more). Specifically, CNN reported on its One O’Clock News that day that ‘two major banks have been caught misusing funds. They are having to settle once and for all’.

The ordinary viewer would not have understood the meaning of ‘once and for all’: but those aware of the immense pressure for completion of the Settlements, which President-Elect Obama was known (by 13th November) to have said ‘must be paid immediately’, will have understood.

• This, by the way, reveals that, as has been known for several years (for certain reasons), CNN has been aware of this nexus of financial scandals all along.

On 27th November, we were explicitly informed, and it was duly confirmed, that the US ‘mainstream’ print and broadcast media had been instructed by Vice President Cheney’s office to refrain from any mention of these matters whatsoever. Earlier, on 25th November 2008, it had been asserted on MSNBC that Cheney had been controlling the ‘mainstream’ media throughout his term in office.

These sudden admissions by ‘mainstream’ outlets did nothing to salvage the tarnished reputation of the ‘mainstream’, which clearly assumed, following the election outcome, that it was now ‘safe’ to start hinting tentatively at the corruption that it has systematically suppressed for years.

• What this means, of course, is that ‘mainstream’ organisations that have suppressed knowledge of criminal operations and practices in high places and within the financial structures are de facto co-conspirators, accessories to the fact of these crimes, and clearly guilty, in the first instance, of offences under the Misprision of Felony Statute.

FIFTH ESTATE HAS PERFORMED AN ‘END-RUN’ ROUND THE ‘MAINSTREAM’
They are uncomfortable because the Fifth Estate (the Internet) has performed an ‘end-run’ around the ‘mainstream’ (sidestream) media, with the consequence that millions of thinking Americans and Europeans are now aware, to some extent, of the existence and implications of this grandfather of all financial corruption scandals. A visitor newly arrived from Germany told the Editor on the 29th November of his sense that many people’s eyes have been opened to the gross criminality of their governments, of financial institutions, and of holders of high office across Europe, as well as in the United States. In other words, the cat is indeed well and truly out of the bag.

BLAIR TOLD HE WOULD NOT BE WELCOME AT CENOTAPH CEREMONY
On 9th November, The Queen and the British nation mourned the dead of the successive Illuminati wars with the moving annual Cenotaph prayers and ceremony, which is usually attended also by former Prime Ministers. This moving ceremony has remained unchanged ever since 1919. On this occasion, Lady Thatcher was present, walking on the arm of her successor, Sir John Major.

Also present, of course, were the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, and the representatives of the other political parties. But former Prime Minister Tony Blair was absent from the ceremony. We are informed that Blair was told not to appear.

POWERFUL ‘CHICAGO PEOPLE’ WANT TO BE PAID, TOO
On 13th November 2008 the world was treated to the disturbing spectacle of five top ‘hedge fund’ managers, believed to be launderers of George Bush Sr.’s corrupt funds – George Soros, James Simons, John Paulson (no relation), Philp Falcone and Kenneth Griffin – testifying before Mr Henry Waxman’s Congressional Committee and blaming the current financial crisis which of course they have immensely exacerbated thanks to their exotic and dubious financial excesses, on ‘the system itself’. As we have previously pointed out, these so-called ‘hedge funds’ are the ‘venting outlets’ straddling the illicit offshore, off-balance sheet, untaxed sector, and the ‘visible’ on-balance sheet financial economy. Large numbers of these funds are now in extreme difficulties due to avalanches of redemptions; and to stay afloat most have now closed their doors to further redemptions, locking their investors out, to the unrestrained fury of many of their number.

•One of the giga-managers who testified on 13th November represents a ‘constituency’ that was double-crossed by Bush Sr. He therefore turned, believe it or not, to Gold Badges for assistance.

Knowledgeable observers will no doubt understand the significance of this. Suffice it to say here, that it is factors like this which, taken with other considerations such as that the ‘Daley people’ in Chicago ‘also want to be paid’, and in conjunction with the decisive powers exercised by MI6 on behalf of The Queen as a consequence of events described earlier in this series (and later in the present report), have been driving the resolution of the Settlements dimension of this crisis.

CLINTON DISMANTLED THE U.S. ENFORCEMENT MECHANISMS
In answer to the understandable reiterated question ‘why haven’t these high-level criminalists been arrested and brought to justice?’, the interim response that we have ourselves been given is that, during the Clinton Administration, the enforcement mechanisms were essentially dismantled.

President Clinton was effectively appointed by, a client of, and ‘works for’ former President Bush Sr., in a tense relationship that is subject to periodic eruptions of great fury and is characterised, of course, by the usual foul ‘Black’ brew of blackmail, intimidation, false witness, and threats that are characteristic of the Workers of Darkness.

BACKGROUND TO THE G-20 MEETING ON 15TH NOVEMBER 2008
Meanwhile the world’s media in early November 2008 were becoming more and more worked up about the preplanned Group of Twenty (G-20) meeting arranged for Washington, DC, on the 15th November. This meeting was subsequently reported to have developed and agreed upon a menu of ‘principles’ for elaborating by officials and technical specialists, to be reviewed in March 2009 – which of course will be far too late in the day to forestall calamity, absent other delayed remedies, viz. the Group of Seven-approved Refinancing Programme, which provides for fully transparent and on-the-books capital markets transactions which will, inter alia, deliver huge ongoing windfall tax receipts into the hands of the US Treasury, and will reverse the one-way deficit financing orgy that has continued for the past century, enriching all parasitical intermediaries such as Goldman Sachs in the process, and which can only be continued as long as international confidence in the US dollar remains intact, which is no longer the case.

Since the American Treasury under ‘Paulson’ systematically destroyed that confidence and fatally jeopardised the ‘Full Faith and Credit’ of the United States because the highest-level criminalists including ‘Paulson’ himself were concentrating almost exclusively upon exploiting the fraudulent finance carousel for their own self-enrichment and in pursuit of their failing globalist hegemony agenda, the open-ended, one-way deficit-financing orgy is no longer viable.

The moment is long overdue, therefore, for the G-7-approved Refinancing Programme to be kick-started, as was supposed to have happened in June/July 2006, when the original funds were first criminally alienated by Henry M. Paulson, the former CEO of Goldman Sachs, who initially presided over the placement under his sole signatory power with Goldman Sachs of the $4.5 trillion brought over from the people’s Bank of China and referenced in the language of the Petition for a Writ of Mandamus (see our reports dated 24th June 2007 and 5th July 2007: Archive).

Following exposure of this scandal by this service, Paulson ostensibly had to have the funds removed from the custody of his former employers.

However it is also known that, although Paulson was only confirmed as US Treasury Secretary on 10th July 2006, he signed a contract on 20th or 21st June 2006 with respect to the disposition of the $4.5 trillion. The discovery at the end of November 2008 that the funds, or some of the funds, were alienated to Athens, Greece (see below), and the known fact that this transfer occurred, according to our special informants, ‘about over two years ago’, suggests that the contract signed by Paulson may have related to the Athens counterparty.

If that is true, then on the face of it, Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., and the Editor of this service, were comprehensively deceived from the very outset, and used as a front – not simply when a ‘switch’ occurred at some stage between 24th June 2007, when the Petition for a Writ of Mandamus was filed, and our appearance at the Alexandria Court hearing on 19th October 2007, as postulated elsewhere in this report.

And if THAT is indeed the case, our technique of ‘walking in a straight line’ is vindicated, since by doing so, we have procured that the multiple layers of deception have been progressively stripped away over time, exposing the theft and frauds that followed the transfer of the original $4.5 trillion by the People’s Bank of China. When truth is matched against falsehood, the truth always prevails, since lies, like plutonium, have a half-life and decay. They can never be sustained indefinitely because they are in conflict with the truth, which can never be permanently suppressed.

This means that all intelligence community deception operations are fundamentally stupid and flawed, as they presuppose that the intended results will be procured BEFORE the lies have decayed and have been found out – a very risky assumption. In the present giga-deception, the deceivers have all been found out because we were on their tail at an early stage and continued walking in a straight line, while the deceivers, as usual, zig-zagged. They thought that multiple layers of deception could be relied upon to provide them with protection. They thought wrong.

BUSH SLOW-HAND-CLAPPED WHEN HE WALKED OUT AFTER AMERO REJECTION
At the G-20 event in Washington, President George W. Bush attempted, incredibly, to ‘sell’ the international community on the Bushite plan for the Amero, thereby providing the first reliable confirmation that this scheme to impose a common currency on the United States, Canada and Mexico to replace the US dollar, was among the tricks in the Bush Crime Family’s magic cabinet.
When the representatives of the international community indicated in no uncertain terms that this trick, which would of course improverish them further, and by massive proportions, would NOT be countenanced or tolerated (i.e., that the Amero would NOT be accepted by foreign central banks), President George W. Bush Jr., went into a sulk and walked out of the conference.

As he left the presence of the G-20 representatives, he was slow-handclapped out of the door. By this gesture, the international community FINALLY revealed what they think of this rogue, this mass murderer, this inveterate thief, this duplicitous little fellow, this self-serving de facto financial and economic terrorist who has degraded the United States, its currency and its reputation on a scale with no historical precedent – this would-be latter-day Herr Hitler who really had intended to stay in power, we now understand, following an atrocity that had been planned ahead of the 2008 election.

EDITOR ‘BLEW’ A PLOT TO STAGE A U.S. DOMESTIC ATROCITY
For we can now reveal that on 27th November 2008 we were advised that ‘a long time ago’ Bush 43 and Vice President Richard Cheney had resolved to have Mr Christopher Story removed from the scene or ‘taken down’ in some unspecified manner. When the Editor enquired why he had not been told this earlier, there was no answer. When the Editor asked why whatever they had had in mind had not been implemented while the Editor was in Washington and New York in October 2008, he was told that ‘you were protected by too many of The Queen’s people’ on the ground.

When the Editor enquired as to precisely what had caused the President and the Vice President of the United States to decree, so to speak, that the Editor should be ‘taken down’, he was told words to the effect that ‘you blew their plan to stage an atrocity as a pretext for imposing martial law and following through by cancelling the election and implementing a de facto dictatorship’.

This appears to have been a reference to allusions inter alia to prospective atrocities published in our report dated 25th October 2007, including the fears of a Twin Cities atrocity that may have been planned to coincide with the commencement of the Republican National Convention to be held on 1st September 2008, and to the matter of the missing nuclear weapon, which we did mention ONCE but only because the matter had already been extensively covered elsewhere: so that can hardly have been the key trigger that ‘blew’ the conspiracy. Revelation of the Twin Cities plot was a much more likely candidate. Note: We did, separately, report recently that Bush 41 was believed to have demanded that the Editor of this service be ‘removed from the equation’.

However the first that we and associates heard of any possible Bush-Cheney intention to interfere with the Editor and this service was in January/February 2008. The ‘shootings’ episodes at the turn of last year, which certainly involved deaths but possibly of at least one double, may have been a part of this operation, with the objective of discrediting the opponents of the financial criminality in high places. It is possible that this intention remained pending for eight months or so, until certain decisive steps were taken in Britain by the Editor of this service on behalf of his US associates in September 2008, which put an end to any such intentions. Certainly, the Editor was not interfered with when attending the IMF Spring Meetings in April 2008, and subsequently while residing in New York. Thus, such intentions appear to have been overruled, or overtaken by events.

POLITICIANS TRYING TO GET PAID BEFORE EVERYONE ELSE
With the roof collapsing on top of them as the full force of these exposures slaps them in the face, corrupt Washington politicians were reported to us on 2nd December to be scrambling to impose their will on those in charge of the Settlements payouts, holding out their filthy hands for money in the hope of having funds channelled to their ‘foundations’, in payment for ‘services rendered’, i.e. corruption, before any payments to Trustees and others were or could be made. However the real reason for this revolting spectacle is believed to be fear among these rats that they won’t be paid at all, if they aren’t paid first. Never in world history has such a despicable bunch of corrupt hacks behaved in such a primitive, unseemly way. They have no shame: they want ‘their’ money, so they can get out. And they want to get out because it’s terribly hot inside. But they want ‘their’ money.

Very late on 2nd December, the Editor was authoritatively informed that the ‘Big Boys’ were to be paid on 3rd December. The phrase ‘Big Boys’ in this context means the corrupt Washington, DC, politicians. When the Editor asked for an indication of their identities, names like Kennedy, Dodd, Bush Jr., Clinton and other well-known political crooks were mentioned. Christopher Dodd is the grandson of Stalin (Josef Djiugashvili-Kochba), in case you had forgotten.

• Has a more revolting spectacle than the thought of these pigs sticking their filthy snouts in the trough ahead of the rightful Trustees, ever disturbed your personal equilibrium?

VERY SERIOUS QUESTIONS THAT GEITHNER HAS TO ANSWER
In late November, it became known that Mr Obama had selected Timothy Geithner, currently President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, as his nominee for US Treasury Secretary.

It is known that this man is currently being ‘watched like a hawk’, given his association with Robert Rubin, the Clintons’ operative guarding their illicit interests at Citibank, in midtown Manhattan. As late as Friday 21st November 2008, Robert Rubin was reported to have interfered with Settlement payments. Obviously, even one of Bush Jr.’s pardoned turkeys would be an improvement over the serial financial criminal, Henry M. Paulson, or his double, whom Timothy Geithner will be replacing, provided the new Senate can approve his credentials. But is that possible?

For serious questions arise in connection with this selection, notably concerning Gaithner’s past exercise of his fiduciary responsibilities, his ethical record, and whether he, like so many of these people, has been, for instance, in breach of the Misprision of Felony Statute.

Since we are concerned about economic terrorism having been relentlessly waged against the United Kingdom, in particular, by the familiar bunch of US criminals in the highest places, these questions necessitate the closest possible consideration, which we believe may be being given to them by the empanelled judicial processes mentioned earlier.

It will be recalled in this context that following lodgement of the Petition for a Writ of Mandamus with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Alexandria [Civil Action No: 1-07 CV 609 – TSE – BRP: see text published in our reports dated 24th June 2007 and 5th July 2007: Archive] demanding performance in respect of the missing $4.5 trillion that was sent over in good faith by the People’s Bank of China, the US Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond had responded that the Petitioner’s remedy lay within the jurisdiction of the United States Eastern District of New York.

• The relevant passage of the Petition for a Writ of Mandamus reads as follows:

“In May of 2006 the People’s Republic of China caused a free and unrestricted transfer of $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars through international bank fund transfer facilities to an account at Bank of America located at Richmond, Virginia. The designated beneficiary of the transferred funds from the People’s Republic of China was Petitioner herein. This transfer was made by the People’s Republic of China solely and exclusively as a requirement under the mentioned [Wanta] settlement agreement. Upon best information and belief between the dates of July 31st to August 2nd of 2006 the United States Department of the Treasury, without authorization of either the remitting party or the receiving party removed the People’s Republic of China transferred financial assets from Bank of America, Richmond, Virginia to an account in the name of Goldman Sachs at Citibank New York, New York as the beneficiary holder of the monies transferred by the People’s Republic of China referenced above.

This “Chip” (Clearing House Interbank Payment) transfer was facilitated from Virginia domiciled banks to New York domiciled banks via the Federal Reserve Bank Richmond. The Chip transfer did not remove the name of Petitioner as the intended recipient of the transferred money from the People’s Republic of China.

The transfer to the Goldman Sachs et al. account at Citibank put a lawless restriction that the funds were not to be released to Petitioner without the authorization of United States Treasury”.

This passage is also reproduced on page 57 of International Currency Review Volume 33, Numbers 3 & 4, the huge double issue mailed to the international financial community worldwide on 14th July 2008, under the heading: ‘DIVERSION OF WANTA-OWNED FUNDS REMITTED BY CHINESE’.

WHY RICHMOND FED SAID THAT REMEDY LIES WITHIN THE NEW YORK JURISDICTION
In our reported posted on 25th October 2007 [see Archive], under the heading ‘CONSPIRACY TO DEPRIVE WANTA OF COURT DOCUMENTS’, we published the full text of a last-minute Affidavit submitted to the Court by Attorney Steven Goodwin, whose Richmond office was the Registered Office of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc, in which various convoluted reasoning was advanced to explain why the documents generated as a consequence of the Petition were never seen by the Petitioner.

• Our report of 25th October 2007 contained, however, a reference to a hearing that the Petitioner ostensibly, therefore, never knew about, dated 7th September 2007.

• The relevant language of our report referenced:

‘The Response filed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and heard by Judge Ellis… on 7th September, wherein the Richmond Fed suggested that the remedy… lies within the jurisdiction of the United States Eastern District Court of New York’.

THE REAL REASON OUR 4TH OCTOBER 2007 REPORT WAS ‘SNIPPED’
Our report dated 25th October 2007 then stated that our related report dated 4th October 2007 had been ‘snipped’, and at the time we thought over-hastily that this had probably occurred ‘because it characterises Citibank as a criminal enterprise’. We elaborated with words to the effect that it was quite stupid of Fort Meade to ‘snip’ this report, given that in so doing it appeared to confirm the accuracy of this statement. However, as has now become apparent, there were much more telling reasons why our report dated 4th October 2007 [see Archive] had been ‘snipped’. For that report also contained the following language:

‘Given that the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond accepts ‘all well pleaded facts as true’, the Richmond Fed further reconfirmed, in the most authoritative manner possible, that the funds had been placed with an account in the name of Goldman Sachs at Citibank, New York… In its Brief in Support of its Motion to Dismiss, the US Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond elaborated that [the Petitioner] ‘has an adequate remedy under Article 4A (Funds Transfer) of the Uniform Commercial Code by demanding that Citibank release to him the funds held’ by that bank ‘for his benefit’’.

In other words, the relevant funds were held within the jurisdiction of the United States Court for the Eastern District of New York, namely the jurisdiction within which the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, of which Timothy Gaithner was President, resides.

PANTOMIME ANTICS AT THE ALEXANDRIA COURT HEARING
Now, at the hearing at the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Alexandria held on 19th October 2007 that your correspondent attended, Judge Ellis was not at all impressed with the behaviour of the Petitioner on the witness stand, so much so that the Judge more or less ignored everything said from the stand. At the time, the Editor thought this was very odd.

The reason for this behaviour, it has now transpired, is that another deal may have been done at some stage between the lodgement of the Petition in late June 2007 and the hearing on the 19th October, whereby the funds had been diverted to Athens, Greece. It was therefore ‘necessary’ to bring the Petition for a Writ of Mandamus proceedings to an indeteriminate conclusion, as it had ‘reached its sell-by date’.

• NOTE: However it is suggested elsewhere that the funds were alienated to Athens much earlier, in which case the matter of the way we were deceived is much more serious, as in that case we would have been deceived from the outset. Either way, the deceivers deserve no sympathy.

This explains why it then became necessary for the Petitioner ‘to part company with Christopher Story’ (as he put it to Michael C. Cottrell, M.S.), whom the Petitioner called ‘an honest journalist, which is very rare’ (in a telephone conversation during the first quarter of 2008).

In other words, the services of this ‘honest journalist’ were now an impediment to the Petitioner’s interests, since a possibly parallel deal (see below) may have been done with Cheney et al. behind the scenes while the legal process was continuing, and an ‘honest journalist’, Christopher Story, could not possibly be informed of this fact and would be liable to ‘get in the way’ now.

• This background also explains why the Petitioner angrily told the Editor in a fractured telephone conversation in March 2008 that ‘YOU HAVE DESTROYED EVERYTHING’.

• For ‘everything’ here, read the illegal diversion of the funds, inter alia to Athens (see below).

ROBERT RUBIN RAN THE MONEY – AND THE DIVERSIONS
This diversion had been orchestrated by the corrupt former President Clinton’s main mole inside Citibank/Citigroup, one Robert Rubin, the former US Treasury Secretary, who authored a prominent article published in the Wall Street Journal dated 29th November, the theme of which was ‘It’s not my fault’. [The Editor calls the habit that these people routinely adopt of protesting too much when cornered, ‘Blankfeinism’, after the display of supreme arrogance by Paulson’s successor as CEO at Goldman Sachs, Mr Blankfein, who boasted in the summer of 2007 about how well his institution had been doing, when of course it had been engaged in dodgy financial manipulations as exposed inter alia by this service].

Confirmation that the original $4.5 trillion funds were diverted by Robert Rubin from Citibank to an account or accounts located in Athens, and that the funds had been so diverted for perhaps two + years, was obtained by this service between 11.30pm and midnight on Wednesday 26th November 2008. For their part, certain Greek parties could not understand what on earth was going on, with some concluding that the Americans had gone completely mad. Whether the transactions were in any way facilitated by John Negroponte, of Greek Jewish extraction, and /or by Olga Sarantopoulos, is not known at this juncture.

It may also be recalled that in the late fall of 2007, the Treasurer of the United States, Ms. Anna Escobedo Cabral, held a meeting with Robert Rubin at Citibank, which she was reported to have left in a seriously discontented frame of mind. It was even rumoured that Ms. Cabral had indicated that she would not stand for this endless corruption any longer, would do her best to procure the Settlements, and would then resign. What the US Treasurer is believed to have found out during that meeting was that certain missing funds had been diverted to Athens.

Reverberations from this and related scandals were still roiling Citibank/Citigroup, one of the CIA’s favoured ‘helpful’ institutions, as late as mid-November 2008. On the 13th November, the institution issued the following brief statement:

‘The Board of Directors of Citigroup Inc. today reiterated its full support for the company’s chairman, Sir Win Bischoff, and said it looks forward to its continued leadership. This morning’s Wall Street Journal report to the contrary is completely erroneous’.

The ‘erroneous’ report had referenced allegations that senior Citigroup staff members had been unhappy with Sir Win’s oversight of Chief Executive Vikram Pandit and his management team, and had suggested that Dick Parsons, the bank’s senior independent director, was possibly being lined up to replace Sir Win Bischoff, who was parachuted into Citibank in part to serve inter alia as the guardian of The Queen’s loan funds with the bank.

But in translation, it can be seen that the pressure on Robert Rubin will have been intense, and that a belated rearguard action may have been mounted to ‘rid the bank’ of HM The Queen’s de facto representative and of the influence of MI6 in procuring the necessary overdue resolution of the Settlements dimension of this vast crisis, without collapsing Citibank and causing thereby a worldwide depression (the ‘ace’ that Robert Rubin has of course been cynically playing). On 21st November, Rubin was STILL reported, as noted, to have tried hard to block the Settlements.

GEITHNER MUST DIVULGE WHAT HE KNEW ABOUT THESE DIVERSIONS
The problem facing Timothy Geithner is that, as President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, he will need to explain to a Senate hearing that is doing its job properly, and almost certainly to the empanelled ‘judicial processes’, exactly what was his involvement in these various criminal diversions of other people’s money. He will also need to answer questions about how it came to pass that profits illegally derived from the stealing of Her Majesty The Queen’s gold on 29th-30th March 2007 came to be deposited inter alia in secret ‘offshore’, off-balance sheet accounts held at Citibank for Bush Sr. (41), Bush Jr. (43), William Jefferson Clinton (42), Mrs Hillary Clinton, Henry M. Paulson, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, Robert Rubin, Dr Alan Greenspan, Dr Ben Bernanke, and other high-level crooks as beneficiaries. This information came from top US military sources.

•YES, the top criminalists MADE MONEY OUT OF THE STEALING OF THE QUEEN’S GOLD and placed their portions of the proceeds in their illegal, untaxed, off-balance sheet hidden accounts with the CIA’s primary money-laundering criminal enterprise, Citibank. WHICH IS TO SAY, that the Bushes, Clintons, Cheney, Paulson et al. were ALL engaged in FINANCING TERRORISM and in ECONOMIC TERRORISM against Her Majesty the Queen and the British State and people.

• In other words, these top criminals, who rant and rave about global terrorism, are themselves veteran terrorists, engaged in the financing of terrorism by their own definitions, illustrating once again the double-mindedness of these snakes. AND, TO COIN A PHRASE, IT GETS MUCH WORSE:

PROVOST MARSHAL BARRED FROM ENTERING SECRET ROOM INSIDE MORGAN STANLEY
In October 2007, the Provost Marshal of the day, with appropriate back-up, visited the offices of Morgan Stanley in New York City. We alluded to the activities of the Provost Marshal extensively in our reports dated between 4th October 2007 and 11th November 2007 [see Archive]. The Provost Marshal at that time was under the control of (criminal) Vice President Richard B. Cheney.

Our impeccable sources were unable to inform the Editor, but are now able to inform us, that:

• The Provost Marshal and his team attempted to obtain entry to a locked room inside the Morgan Stanley building. They were specifically barred from entering this room, by Morgan Stanley staff, who stood outside the doors and prevented them from entering.

• The purpose of the Provost Marshal’s demand for entry to this room was to obtain back-up evidence that Morgan Stanley, the CEO of which remains John Mack, was engaged in financing terrorism operations in general, and Al-Qaeda in particular, from this room.

• How did the Provost Marshal know this? Because following the arrests bankers in Europe which we also reported during that period, investigators had obtained tear-sheets PROVING that such terrorism financing operations were being run out of this room at Morgan Stanley. Specifically, the tear-sheets carried the finger-prints of the following criminal operatives holding the highest US offices: George H. W. Bush Sr., Vice President Richard B. Cheney, Henry M. Paulson Jr., Dr. Alan Greenspan, William Jefferson Clinton, and Mrs Hillary Clinton (these being the names confirmed to us, but of course there were others, too). The tear-sheets referenced key secret bank accounts, access to which was blocked off and which the Provost Marshal, controlled by Cheney at the time, was unable to inspect. At the time, our sources were ordered NOT to convey this information to us.

SECRET ROOM FROM WHICH AL-QAEDA AND OTHER TERRORIST OPERATIONS WERE FUNDED
We are told that this room housed contracts and other documents relating to the use of funds in the secret bank accounts referenced immediately above.

The operations directed from this secret Morgan Stanley room or office suite were concerned SPECIFICALLY with the terrorist-financing of Al-Qaeda and other international terrorism operations, according to our sources. This means that, as stated above, ALL those named by military sources as beneficiaries of the secret ‘offshore’ accounts, headed by Mr Paulson as US Treasury Secretary, were engaged in the diversion of illicit funds for the purposes of financing terrorism and Al-Qaeda, which the United States and Britain routinely blame for the terrorist abominations that are being financed through these operations run out of the secret office inside Morgan Stanley.

• Thus it is finally determined that the world’s most dangerous revolutionary pariah state is indeed the United States, with the United Kingdom, in a disreputable and reprobate breach with what Great Britain is supposed to stand for, aiding and abetting these hideous, murderous abominations.

• No wonder Blair’s ‘confession’ is reported to be causing these odious criminals nightmares.

Therefore, the Directors of Morgan Stanley and of Citibank stand accused of being engaged in the FINANCING OF TERRORISM, along with Messrs Bush Sr., Bush Jr., the former President Clinton, Mrs Hillary Clinton (who may soon be pontificating all over the world’s stage excoriating Al-Qaeda and even banging on about Osama Bin Laden (the CIA’s ‘Tim Osman’) whom these fools have to keep alive in order to sustain their strategic deception, even though he died on 26th December 2001), Vice President Richard B. Cheney, the former and current Chairmen of the Federal Reserve Board, Drs. Greenspan and Bernanke, Robert Rubin and other co-conspirators in this BIGGEST FINANCIAL CORRUPTION, TERRORISM AND POLITICAL SCANDAL IN WORLD HISTORY.

CHENEY RAN THE MEDIA, RUBIN RAN THE MONEY
In the above context, it was reconfirmed with the same batch of intelligence that Vice President Cheney had been ‘running the media’ while Robert Rubin had been ‘running the money’ – all of which had been going on while we were steadily chipping away at the endless deceptions, lies, diversionary tactics and obfuscations with our ‘Wantagate’ reports, and thereafter.

The Sunday Times, London, of 30th November 2008, carried an extensive article which accurately confirmed that President-Elect Obama had been obliged to seize the initiative so as to fill the de facto vacuum at the top in the United States, given that every strand of US policy has long been atrophied by the corrupt behaviour of the holders of the highest offices, who have done hardly anything since mid-2006 except manipulate the illicit movement of funds so as to extract as much money for lining their own pockets as possible, and to satisfy and make whole the furious demands and elevated expectations of heinous, ruthless ‘Black Ops’ interests and of innumerable corrupt constituencies who have been double-crossed by the ‘Box Gang’ (the Bush-Clinton Crime Nexus).

OBAMA OSTENSIBLY INSISTING ON FINAL SETTLEMENT IN FULL
On Monday 24th November 2008, the President-Elect signed papers requiring the Settlements to be implemented. In the batch of information received late on 26th November, it was confirmed that Mr Obama has been insisting on settlement, a fact that had been confirmed to us earlier in an email dated 13th November 2008 (received at 01:47am) from a Trustee to the effect that that ‘Obama has said we must be paid immediately’.

The sources stated, and it was later confirmed, that Mr Obama has been absolutely appalled at what he had found out following his election victory and that his shock has been all the greater because he had realised that Vice President-Elect Biden had known all about this open-ended criminality.

The Editor speculates that it has been the shock of these discoveries of this wall-to-wall deception, corruption and blatant criminality, that accounts for Obama’s compulsion (given the unprecedented and extraordinary circumstances of this crisis) to ‘act presidentially’.

Americans use this phrase rather loosely and perhaps a trifle cynically. But here, the gravity of the chaos and the corruption is so extreme that the incoming President was immediately left with no option but to respond in a responsible and vigorous manner. Which he did.

It is also true, of course, that in presiding over the Settlements and procuring the implementation of the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme, the President-Elect will ensure that the disaster that otherwise awaits his Presidency will in fact be transformed over time into a triumphant success.

This is NOT play-acting: it implies confirmation of strength of character, determination, an iron will and of a man who, whatever faults he like everyone else may possess, has immediately risen to the immense challenges that he ‘unexpectedly’ faces given the circumstances and the derailing of the various schemes and plots to have him removed from the scene. After the Bush Jr. White House had tried to bribe him, Mr Obama must have entertained no remaining doubts about the extreme gravity of the Republic’s crisis, and must have been reinforced in his belief in his mission to help the United States climb out of the worst outbreak of financial iniquity the Republic has ever faced.

On Saturday 22nd November 2008, a week after the G-20 meeting and after George Bush Jr. had finally ceased his resistance (so it was being said, not that Mr Bush had any power to resist left), the ‘country payees’ received what was grossly overdue to them in cash. We realise that there have been earlier occasions when ‘the countries’ were reported to have been paid (which have turned out to be occasions when their dollar funds were on-screen but not accessed): but the point here is that this information concerning ‘wholesale’ payments was received over the weekend of 22nd-23rd November, and ‘confirmed’ by separate sources on 1st December 2008.

For the countries to have been paid, a key Tier Two US Trustee must have needed to deploy his instruments, which were integral to the countries being paid. This information was accompanied by indications that US Treasury securities had been issued for the Settlement throughout the week following the G-20 meeting, with Tier Three payees therefore likely to be paid with Treasuries.

A caveat applies to all such information, however, namely that, given ‘banking secrecy’, none of this can be verified, even though some such information is ‘confirmed’: it is all, by definition, based on hearsay – which is why we have usually avoided referencing such ‘intelligence’. But at this late stage, some indication of what is supposed to have been happening, is necessary. A key Trustee payable with the countries, should have been paid, at the latest, on or by Sunday 30th November.

OBAMA ‘WORKING IN ‘LOCK-STEP’ WITH SARKOZY AND MI6’
Mr Obama’s ‘presidential’ behaviour has been buttressed by the fact that President Sarkozy of France, who is also President of the European Union until 31st December this year, and Britain’s MI6 (elements truly serving HM The Queen) are working in lock-step with the President-Elect to procure finalisation of the Settlements, not least in conformity with the instructions and deadline imposed upon the French President requiring him to fulfil his new ‘mandate to pay’ obtained when President Bush Jr. finally ceded what he thought was still his authority in the matter, as previously described by this service.

Unfortunately, both the President-Elect and President Sarkozy encountered further resistance – not from Chancellor Merkel – who as we reported in October, had been on Mr Bush Sr.’s corrupt payroll for four years in exchange for ‘looking after’ Bush-linked funds that we now know were flowing to and from Deutsche Bank and the Vatican Bank (controlled by Merkel’s agent there, Dr Hans Tietmeyer) via the de facto clearing house in London, Coutts Bank – but from the current British Prime Minister, GORDON BROWN.

GORDON BROWN CONFIRMED AS IMPEDING THE SETTLEMENTS
PRESIDENT-ELECT BARACK OMABA THREATENS BROWN WITH ARREST
The batch of intelligence obtained by this service between 11.30pm and midnight UK time on that Wednesday 26th November, all of which was confirmed to be 100% accurate (with the exception of an allegation that active Gold Badges had been instructed to ‘take Story down’, an instruction that is now believed to be redundant anyway), contained the following:

• Gordon Brown had lately been impeding finalisation of the Settlements: in other words there has been no discontinuity between Blair and Brown in respect of the sabotage; and:

• President-Elect Obama sent an agent over to London to speak directly to the Prime Minister with the following stark message: If you interfere any further with the Settlements payouts, YOU WILL BE ARRESTED. In this connection, Barack Obama will have issued this warning with the full authority of Sarkozy, equipped with his said ‘mandate to pay’, backed by the ‘right’ MI6 elements.

When we obtained confirmation of this intelligence, we were advised that ‘relevant parties’ had become aware that someone at very high level in London must have been ‘standing in the way’, given that almost all other known blockages had been removed, with many arrests having taken place across Europe during November, as in the preceding several months.

On 24th November, we had another episode of the ‘waiting for bank answerbacks’ syndrome, it being confirmed later that one bank had failed to provide the necessary answerback, as a direct consequence of which the banker in question had been arrested. There is a suspicion that this sabotage occurred in London and may have been directly connected to the fact that Mr Brown was found to have been impeding the Settlements.

• NOTE: It remains possible that what has been happening is an expanded version of the ‘pass the parcel’ technique whereby the scene constantly shifts between the players, with the spotlight then directed from one to the next one, while the action has already moved to the subsequent crook: a more extensive game than was being played by the highest-level criminalists in 2007 and earlier in 2008, when ‘A’ ‘washes his hands’ of the matter and then points to ‘B’, who has carefully developed his alibi while the action is being corruptly handled by ‘C’, as the spotlight lingers on ‘B’. That model was seen in the US context: perhaps it is now being applied internationally, with the overall aim of sabotaging performance.

• Last week it was Sarkozy. This week it’s Brown. Next week, its Bush again.
After all, these rats, as previously advised, are all out of the same sewer.

• In any given sewer, each rat is different, yet every rat is the same colour. All of them stink.

SUDDEN REHABILITATION OF MANDELSON ‘EXPLAINED’
We are led to believe that the discovery, at this latest of all stages, that Gordon Brown had been impeding the Settlements, has placed this Prime Minister in the same position as his predecessor during his final months in office, when he was under extreme pressure from sources in authority to step down from Downing Street. Given this state of affairs, some new light is hereby thrown on the sudden reappearance of two sinister characters at the centre of the Government in Whitehall and Downing Street. We refer to:

• Peter [now Lord] Mandelson, who was suddenly pulled out of Brussels, where he had been serving as European Trade Commissioner, and has surfaced as Business Secretary at the very centre of the Government, with at times nowadays a higher profile than the Prime Minister.

Mandelson is believed to be a direct Rothschild agent and operates with a brief that will ‘go nowhere’ (see below), to push the Brown Government into ditching the pound in favour of the Euro, a line now openly supported by the compromised President of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso. Given that the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, has recently been ‘fingered’ obstructing the Settlements, he may now see capitulation on this central issue as his own route to salvation and as a means of wreaking revenge on The Queen. More generally, as this grandfather of all financial corruption crises unravels, powerful interests are finding their positions threatened, oligarchs are being cut down to size or wiped out, and the furniture is being thrown all around the room, much of it broken into smaller pieces or even ground to dust.

• Alistair Campbell, Tony Blair’s notorious former ‘press agent’, a.k.a. chief intelligence handler, who has suddenly reappeared in Number 10 Downing Street, we understand.

It is possible that the reappearance of these people may have had something to do with Gordon Brown’s irregular behaviour, which we first identified in the following paragraph published in the report dated 18th June 2008:

WHY DID BROWN FLY TO NORTHERN IRELAND HAVING EARLIER
SAID GOODBYE TO THE BUSHES ON THE STEPS OF DOWNING STREET?
We will now pose the following question. WHY was it ‘necessary’ for Brown, who had seen George Bush in the morning of Monday 16th June, to rush up to Northern Ireland so as to be in a position to be standing on the tarmac at Belfast airport, to ‘greet’ the President and Laura when they arrived in Northern Ireland? After all, he had just said goodbye to President Bush. Perish the thought that the purpose of his presence there might have been to open bank accounts. Perish the thought.

• REMARKABLE FACT: The Editor was subsequently informed that this observation alerted the relevant US and British authorities to the fact that Bush flew to Northern Ireland precisely to open bank accounts and that Brown was associated with this activity. Many weeks later the Editor was told that Brown had subsequently been ‘educated’.

… However it now appears, given the intelligence received and confirmed on 26th November 2008, that Brown did not learn his lessons well, i.e., the fool paid no attention (3).

We believe, therefore, that Gordon Brown is now de facto a ‘lame duck’ – a NEW fact which, very surprisingly, seems already to have been sensed by certain ‘mainstream’ outlets, given one or two sudden reversals performed by journalists in respect of their assessments of Mr Brown’s political position. For, all of a sudden, after the Prime Minister had been at the receiving end of a peculiar avalanche of domestic and international praise for his ‘robust’ response to the crisis (which he and his predecessor helped to generate), we read that his standing has declined sharply as economic and financial conditions have deteriorated ever more steeply during the past couple of weeks.

[Note: In an obvious attempt to reverse the impression created by earlier opinion polls, a new poll published in The Daily Telegraph on Tuesday 2nd December suggested that the Conservatives’ poll lead over the Labour Government had collapsed to just 1%. It should be recalled that these opinion polls are actually a device to enable the ‘controllers’ to see which way the wind is blowing, but that they are also used to confuse the people, to sway the thinking of gullible journalists, and to trim the perceptions of targeted constituencies, in order to fine-tune (in this case) an evolving and highly charged political situation, in which many senior figures’ careers may be on the line].

BROWN IMPEDING, MANDELSON SUPPOSEDLY ALLEVIATING
The situation described above is even more convoluted when one considers the contrasting overt behaviour of the Prime Minister and of Lord Mandelson, the Rothschild agent he has hauled back from Brussels and installed in the Cabinet at the centre of Government as Business Secretary.

On the one hand (see above), Gordon Brown is found to have been impeding the outstanding settlements payouts – even though we have been advised that, as of 22nd November, President Bush Jr. had finally ‘agreed’ to the releases, notwithstanding that he had weeks earlier provided President Sarkozy with an irrevocable ‘mandate to pay’ – while on the other hand Mr Brown’s newly appointed Business Secretary has been issuing rapid-fire edicts and statements purporting to signal the British Government’s ‘commitment’ to the struggling industrial and business sectors.

But on closer inspection it would appear that Lord Mandelson’s stance is curiously ambivalent. For instance, he told The Sunday Telegraph (30th November 2008) that he had submitted a preliminary paper to the Labour Party’s National Economic Council in late November which he explained as follows: ‘I made the point that there has to be a screening process to distinguish between those [industries] which are viable and those which are not. But we also need to take account of our own resources and European state aid rules’.

So, leaving aside the fact that President-Elect Obama had to take the extraordinary step of sending an emissary to Number 10 Downing Street to inform the Prime Minister directly that if he continued to block the settlements, WHICH ARE THE SOLUTION TO LORD MANDELSON’S PROBLEMS over the medium term as the G-7 Approved Refinancing Programme will generate the necessary flow of on-the-books liquidity to refinance the US and European banks on the books, the overt position at the very end of November 2008 was that (a) the Prime Minister had been SABOTAGING the ONLY available solution, while (b) his former enemy, Peter Mandelson, who must surely be aware of this, was busily setting limits and citing obstacles to the provision of state assistance to Britain’s rapidly crumbling business and industrial sectors. At the very least, this does suggest a truly constipated, dislocated directorate at the centre of British governance which needs to be swept away if the country is not indeed to sink into a depression which could make 1929 look like a seaside holiday.

ECONOMIC TERRORISTS IN DOWNING STREET?
But at worst, the two most powerful figures in the British Government, Gordon Brown and Lord Mandelson, had themselves been exacerbating Britain’s problems by blocking (at least until late November) the Settlements payouts, thereby assisting the interests of the Bush-Clinton Crime Syndicate and the Octopus, which in turn implies that both these characters may themselves be engaged in perpetrating economic terrorism against the Monarch, the United Kingdom and its people, and should therefore be arrested under the European anti-terrorism laws adopted by the Westminster Parliament: which, presumably, is what President-Elect Barack Obama had in mind when, with the support of President Sarkozy and MI6, he had to despatch a special emissary to inform Mr Brown that he would be arrested if he continued to block the Settlements.

There may indeed, therefore, be the soundest reasons for believing that the very sudden transfer of Mandelson (previously a sworn enemy of Mr Brown, and a man who is known to have excoriated Brown in the past, behind his back, in the most bitter terms), to the very epicentre of the Brown Labour Government, appears to represent a defiant and desperate move by the Prime Minister to wrap ‘European’ protection around himself while at the same time appearing to be ‘getting back at’ The Queen, and effectively ‘changing sides’ – a stance apparently reinforced by the sudden reappearance of Blair’s former ‘handler’, Alistair Campbell, in Downing Street.

• If so, Gordon Brown may have been sharply disabused of this thinking or strategy, as on 2nd December The Financial Times reported that the Prime Minister had ‘quashed’ Barroso’s claim that the economic crisis was driving Britain to abandon sterling and ‘find refuge with’ the Euro. Mr Brown’s spokesman (INTERESTINGLY, he was not named, which is VERY UNUSUAL, implying that this was a PLANTED article) was said to have ‘been forced by Barroso’s remarks’ to state that there are ‘no plans’ for Britain to join the European Collective Currency.

• ‘Changing sides’ among the operatives on the stage is all the rage during this ‘discontinuity’ period, when the correlation of forces is being shaken from top to bottom. It may explain, for instance, the appearance of Mrs Clinton as prospective Secretary of State under Barack Obama. More significantly, however, the trade-off here incorporates the following equation: Mrs Clinton may believe she is ‘safe’ from the consequences of her crimes if confirmed by the Senate, while in exchange Mr Obama will know that SHE knows she cannot step out of line, or she will be ‘chopped’ by the President-Elect, whereupon she will immediately be vulnerable to arrest and its aftermath.

Operative Campbell ostensibly serves John Scarlett of MI6, whose notorious orientation towards the European Union Collective (the long-range Abwehr/DVD anti-nation state strategic entrapment instrument) is well known. MI6 appears to be split, as would be expected, along similar fault lines as the criminal enterprise known as the CIA – between the pro-pan-German faction, and those who still try, against immense odds, but do quite well in the grim circumstances, loyally to serve their home countries and their Heads of State.

If the foregoing analysis is reasonably accurate, any such plot to leverage the present situation to yank Britain out of sterling and into the Euro will fail.

The reason is that Britain can never abandon the pound, which was one of the world currencies designated at Bretton Woods to operate in parallel with the US dollar. The international trading system cannot allow the pound to cease to exist because it is a mainstay with the dollar, and now China, of the international trading system. For international trading arrangements to function, there must be at least two world currencies in the mix, to allow offsetting to take place. The Euro cannot be used as a mainstay currency for this purpose as it is a wholly artificial currency that is supported by both nothing and no government. The yen can be used for offsetting purposes, but it was not a currency that was available when the Bretton Woods system was established as Japan was an Axis country and its currency was of course anathema.

Hence, all talk of Britain joining the Euro – which it is now quite possible Brown may have suddenly sought to embrace behind the scenes, given the pressure he is under following his treachery with Bush last June and his blocking of the Settlements – is eyewash.

For EC President Barroso to wade in with verbal pressure designed to take advantage of Brown’s predicament, smells of a hopeless rearguard response. That leaves the question: who, then, will take over if Brown has to go? And the answer, on this analysis, would be Mandelson – if that had not been precluded (unless he renounces his new peerage) by the fact that he is in the House of Lords. Mandelson may well be operating in conjunction with Messrs Barroso and Rothschild to try to ‘bounce’ Britain into the Euro, but this endeavour, like Brown’s premiership, is doomed.

All of which illuminates what Brown was REALLY up to when he bounded around the world stage and received a substantial, but very fragile, uplift in the British domestic public opinion polls (the mechanism used by the ‘controllers’ to gauge the way the wind is blowing), as the gale-force winds of this crisis assumed hurricane proportions.

He was promoting A NEW BRETTON WOODS, so that the unique position of the pound sterling laid down in the Bretton Woods agreement could then be scrapped, the continued existence of the old Bretton Woods Agreement being an irremovable impediment to the DVD’s project for scrapping the pound. Now that this little ruse has been exposed, and you are for the high-jump, Mr Brown, your clumsy behaviour in seeking to have the existing Bretton Woods Agreement swept away, is DEAD IN THE WATER, mate. You were trying to be ‘too clever by half’, and you messed up BIG TIME.

SIGNS OF THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM CRACKING UP
Turning to the concomitant collapse of the economy, quite apart from the daily headline news about well-known high street and corporate names in severe financial trouble, there are ominous signs that the real economy’s distribution system is on the verge of breaking down.

• According to experts on classical Rome, the primary factor, aside from decadence, that brought Rome to its knees – leaving vast tracts of the city itself abandoned and deserted for a millennium and more – was the disintegration of the distribution system.

The Romans had perfected certain mass production techniques for goods in widespread demand, such as vessels for the transportation of wine, roof tiles, domestic housewares, shoes and other products, which depended upon an efficient system of distribution to reach their markets.

Archaeologists have long since taken note of the sharp deterioration in the quality of, say, roof tiles that took place somewhat abruptly in the fourth century or earlier. The main reason for this rapid deterioration is believed to be that the distribution system collapsed, which in turn brought the mass production operations to a halt.

• People in need of roofing tiles were therefore reduced either to stealing them from abandoned buildings, turning to local sources of manufacture, or making the artefacts themselves.

On 18th November, Atradius, the United Kingdom’s largest credit insurer, confirmed that it was clawing back the insurance offered to suppliers to at least 12,000 British businesses. The insurer provides cover against non-payment of bills for goods supplied on credit.

The Financial Times reported on 19th November that one broker had said that the withdrawal by the Atradius corporation was ‘unprecedented in my life’, adding that up to 20,000 British corporations may have been affected over the preceding two weeks alone. Another broker asserted that the UK construction, retail and leisure sectors had been affected and that the Government might soon have to provide credit or insurance to struggling suppliers.

Smaller suppliers typically, and usually with good reason, do not trust larger corporations, which place orders for goods to be supplied on credit, to meet their obligations, on time or at all. So to mitigate the risk of the corporate purchaser not paying its bills, the supplier can take out credit insurance: indeed without such cover, the supplier is less likely to provide the goods needed by the larger corporation – creating a dangerous situation that can cause the collapse of the larger corporations themselves. In other words, the supply chain and distribution systems are creaking and showing early signs of a potential to seize up. On 29th November, the insurance group Amlin, which is estimated to own about 4% of the UK credit insurance market, was reported likewise to be pulling out of the credit insurance market, having reportedly decided not to write any new policies for businesses supplying goods to other businesses on credit.

These insurance firms are clearly anticipating increased losses from payouts. Atradius is said to be aiming to reduce its overall exposure to risk in the United Kingdom by about 7%, compared with a projected 5% reduction of its exposures to the business credit market in the rest of the world. However should the gradient of the economic downturn continue to steepen at its present rate, pointing straight into a depression, thanks to the ongoing criminal sabotage, we would expect such credit risk exposures to be cut back much more sharply after the turn of the year.

• The above observations were prepared on 30th November. On 2nd December, Alan Duncan, the Shadow Business Secretary (‘Conservative’ Party), authored an article in The Financial Times in which, in true socialist fashion, he called for the state to underwrite ‘vital insurance cover to stop the credit crunch [sic] precipitating the collapse of supply chains’.

BRITAIN AND AMERICA ON THE BRINK OF A DEPRESSION
Which brings us to a pressingly critical point. Thanks to the criminal activities of the holders of the highest offices in the United States, Britain and Germany, to name the very worst offenders, both the United States and Britain are now hovering on the brink of a real DEPRESSION, with General Motors effectively bankrupt in the United States and numerous corporations and well-known names such as Woolworths in the United Kingdom going to the wall in a frenetic cascade that is being accompanied by steepening declines in consumer confidence and purchases in recent weeks.

Paul Volcker, who will certainly serve as Mr Obama’s most prestigious economic adviser beyond the special rôle that he has accepted, told a conference convened by Lombard Street Research in London on 17th November that the economic slump has begun to spread after a shocking collapse in output over the two months to mid-November, threatening to overwhelm the incoming Obama Administration as it struggles to restore confidence.

‘What this crisis reveals’, Mr Volcker said, ‘is a broken financial system like no other in my lifetime. Normal monetary policy is not able to get money flowing. The trouble is that, even with all this [government] protection [sic], the market is not moving again’.

In an appropriate oblique criticism of his successor as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, the criminal operative, arrested in June 2007, Dr Alan Greenspan, Mr Volcker elaborated that ‘there has been leveraging in the economy beyond imagination, and nobody [at the time] was saying we need to do something’. Mr Volcker also blamed what he called ‘the new means of credit alchemy that led bankers to slice and dice mortgage debt into packages that disguised risk’.

THE DERIVATIVES CRISIS = THE FRAUDULENT FINANCE CRISIS
Actually, none of the ‘downstream’ slicers and dicers, including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, had or have any recourse to the sole source of funds, namely the mortgager. The ONLY party with true recourse is the original mortgage bank.

Therefore, ALL ‘downstream’, repackaged, collectivised, securitised so-called derivative ‘assets’ are fraudulent and are worth zero, a fact of life recognised by the regional Federal Reserve Banks, we understand, and which is a source of tension between them and the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

In our forthcoming paper on this subject, we will provide further proof that the derivatives are all worth zero, which is the CENTRAL ISSUE. The only authoritative (that is, internationally approved) derivatives aggregate data are the numbers published by the Bank for International Settlements, reproduced and elaborated by the International Monetary Fund, for instance in its October 2008 Global Financial Stability Report subtitled ‘Financial Stress and Deleveraging: Macrofinancial Implications and Policy’, made available in the Press Room at the IMF/World Bank Group Annual meetings held in October in Washington DC.

Both sources adjust the data, on an estimated basis, for double-counting (2). According to these sources, the notional value of outstanding adjusted global over-the-counter derivatives contracts had expanded from $257,894 billion at the end of 2004, to $596,004 billion by the end of December 2007. The most recent figure cited (applicable to around mid-October 2008) was $667 trillion.

But the underlying gross market values of these outstanding contracts rose from just $9,377 billion at the end of December 2004, to $14,522 billion by the end of 2007.

Thus, whereas the gross market values of outstanding contracts were ‘worth’ 3.6% of their notional values at the end of 2004, the equivalent proportion three years later was 2.4%.

But such assessments are in fact meaningless because, as noted above, these exotic ‘derived’ instruments are, by definition, marketed WITHOUT RECOURSE to the underlying source of real funds, which means that the derived ‘assets’ are fundamentally fraudulent.

If the morgager does default, the only party that can ever know about the default is the original mortgage bank. The ‘downstream’ parties never get to know about it, and AREN’T INTERESTED.

It used to be the case that maximum derivatives leveraging possible in the United Kingdom was 10:1. Earlier this year, leveraging operations of 30:1 were being reported from London, and the large US financial criminal enterprises are believed until recently, at least, to have favoured mad leveraging ratios as extended as 40:1.

This would theoretically enable Citibank, for instance, to convert $306 billion in quick succession to $12,240 billion. However all such proceeds would have to be stashed away off-balance sheet, are adjudged now to be dubious, and cannot be surreptitiously transferred onto the balance sheet, under the Basel-II settlement, given the necessity for the disclosure of source of funds – and the crucial, little-mentioned, factor that auditors’ fears of being sued for misrepresentation, and more generally for their own survival given what has happened to some of their peers, mean that they are no longer susceptible to condoning ‘smoke and mirrors’ treatments of clients’ accounts.

BUSH PEOPLE STILL PUSHING FRAUDULENT FINANCE TRADES
In the face of the reality that the perpetrators of these fraudulent finance operations have been found out, it is STILL the case that Bush Sr. and his few remaining cronies have been continuing, or attempting to persist with, ‘business as usual’, looking for counterparties for exotic trades.

Most such prospective parties have long since realised that Bush-linked associates are criminal operatives: so, as indicated, searching for counterparties, even in Dubai which is now in financial trouble, has been proving a problem. The fact that these people are STILL persisting with this behaviour shows how brainlessly bovine and set in their criminal ways they remain.

One of the lessons that astute counterparties around the world will or ought to have learned by now is that the Bush-linked criminal Octopus, being by far the most ruthless and reckless cabal of criminal financial operatives in human history, ALWAYS, ALWAYS, turns on their collaborators on the basis of the standard, crude ‘bait and switch’ double-cross technique that they were taught at intelligence school. That was what happened, of course, with Iraq.

But although we have publicised the fact that one purpose of the invasion of Iraq was to ransack the Central Bank of Iraq, steal its gold, currency and other assets and acquire control over Rafidain Bank and thus over its sub-accounts in London, believed to hold fiat assets worth an estimated $100 trillion, the deeper reason for the second invasion has not hitherto been divulged.

THE U.S. TREASURY PLATES SHIPPED TO THE USSR IN 1944
Some time in 1944, a US aircraft supposedly (but see below) crashed in Siberia. A certain Soviet KGB officer operating in the United States, one Colonel Kotikov, referred to this aircraft within the hearing of at least one US military officer, as ‘the money plane’. When questioned by the US officer as to the meaning of the phrase ‘the money plane’, Colonel Kotikov explained that the US Treasury was shipping engraved printing plates and related banknote printing materials to the Soviets so that they could start to print the same ‘occupation money’ for distribution in occupied Germany as the United States was printing for the same purpose.

As a Master Printer (because we own a small printing works), the Editor of this service knows only too well that there is ONE cast-iron rule in the printing trade: NEVER release the printing plates.

They are ‘tools of the trade’ and represent components that have to be manufactured in order to print the copies, which is what the customer buys. The customer does not purchase the tools from which the copies were manufactured: just the copies. What the US Treasury SHOULD have done was to print German occupation money for the Soviets, and ship them the currency itself.

• Unless, that is, this was a component of a deep-cover US economic warfare operation.

But unbelievably, the US Treasury shipped not only the engraved printing plates, but also coloured inks, varnish, tint blocks, sample paper and other components, in two shipments conveyed to the USSR via five C-47s. The shipments were arranged at the highest level in Washington, DC, with the planes loaded up at National Airport.

The Soviets then proceeded to print the new marks that their part of occupied Germany needed, which the United States redeemed, with no accountability whatsoever, to the gross amount of $250 million, a colossal sum in those days.

The Soviet official who had repeatedly agitated for the US authorities to send Treasury printing plates to Moscow, was Andrei Gromyko (Katz), who was then Soviet Ambassador to Washington. If Washington had meant to wage economic warfare (possibly by supplying the Soviets with slightly doctored printing plates so that Soviet print runs could be distinguished from the equivalent mark notes printed by or for the US Military Administration), this operation appears to have backfired.

Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) maintained unhealthily close links at the very heart of the US Government of the day, via Alger Hiss and Harry Dexter White. A published US Department of State Memorandum dated 14th April 1944 of a telephone conversation between Henry Morgenthau, the US Treasury Secretary and a Mr James Clement Dunn, of the State Department, entitled ‘Duplicate plates to be furnished to the Soviet Union’ indicated that the five C-47s finally left National Airport on 24th May 1944. Mr Gromyko even demanded a replacement consignment, after one of the planes had crashed (see above); and the US authorities never queried his ‘information’, sending a plane with a ‘replacement’ consignment of printing plates and materials to the USSR on 7th June 1944.

In this episode, Gromyko had insisted on obtaining US Treasury printing plates so that the Soviets could print German occupation currency without accountability, because the Soviets knew that the US Army would convert such currency into US dollars (whereas the Russians, of course, refused to redeem the same currency with roubles).

As a consequence, every Russian mark that fell into the hands of an American soldier or accredited civilian became a potential charge against the Treasury of the United States. Using the materials provided by Washington, the Russians confiscated an erstwhile Nazi printing plant in Leipzig, deep inside the Russian Zone and therefore at a safe distance from American inspection, and started up the machinery. By December 1946, the US Military Government had found that it had redeemed US dollars to the value of at least 2,500,000,000 marks in excess of the total value of occupation marks issued by its Finance Office. Oh, and the Soviets never paid an invoice for $18,102.84 rendered by the US Treasury to cover the cost of the engraving plates and the materials delivered in 1944.

PRECEDENT SET FOR U.S. PLATES DELIVERED BY BUSH TO SADDAM
Why have we apparently diverged with this historical account of how the Soviets bilked the United States for $250 million in 1944-46? Because a similar operation was apparently perpetrated in Iraq. Only this time round, engraved printing plates were reportedly made available to Saddam Hussein by George H. W. Bush Sr., the arrogant, criminal representative of the DVD who thought he was so powerful that, as late as around 2004, he could even tell members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to ‘go take a flying [expletive deleted] at the moon’.

If the motive for delivering US Treasury printing plates (whether officially authorised or not) to the Iraqi régime of Saddam Hussein in any way replicated the pattern of the 1944-46 scamming ruse, the objective underlying this treachery will have been to impose a drain on the US Treasury through the redemption of Iraqi dinars into US dollars, which could then be pocketed by US operatives.

It is suspected, therefore, that among the cynical ‘Black’ motives for the invasion of Iraq, and the consequent murder and displacement of around 2,000,000 people, not to mention the thousands of US and Allied military personnel and those 100+ ‘special operatives’ who raided the Central Bank of Iraq and were then grouped together so as to be deliberately bombarded by deadly US weaponry in a contrived ‘friendly fire’ operation, will have been the familiar one, repeated in other contexts in this murky background, of protecting the part of criminal DVD operative George Bush Sr.’s anatomy that he uses for sitting upon. Bush’s ‘rogue’ US monetary printing plates had to be retrieved.

• POSTCRIPT:

ATTEMPT TO INSTAL A CAMERA OUTSIDE OUR OFFICE EXPOSED
On Tuesday 11th November, a visitor to the Editor’s London office noticed that a camera, sprouting several antennae, had been erected on a tall street lighting lamp post located immediately opposite our office building. Earlier, when the Editor had left the building to run certain errands in Victoria Street, he had noticed at least half a dozen men and two big Westminster City Council vehicles, one with a hydraulic lift, parked adjacent to the lamp post, engaged in complex activity focused upon the street lighting. The Editor deliberately reported this matter later via our monitored telephone lines and then, with his visitor, stood outside in the pavement looking at the camera from various angles, before we repaired to a nearby hostelry for some refreshments.

• The camera remained in situ, as viewed from the upper storeys of our building, as late as midnight that evening. By 9.15am the following morning, it had been removed.

On Wednesday 12th November, the Editor began a series of telephone calls to Westminster City Council, with a view to obtaining some explanation for the erection and overnight removal of the camera and antennae overlooking our office. After innumerable attempts to extract a coherent explanation, and having left various voicemail messages expressing our dismay at this behaviour, the Editor finally had to inform the Personal Assistant to the Chief Executive of Westminster City Council, asking for an urgent response. Whereupon he was inundated with responses, culminating in the following explanation by Patrick Allen, a senior Council executive (paraphrase) in answer to our questions: Who authorised the camera? What was its purpose? What budget financed it?:

‘We are testing equipment. The major supplier, British Telecom Plc, is late with its deliveries of hardware. But the lesser suppliers have delivered in accordance with their contracts and have submitted their invoices and want to be paid. The intended system cannot be installed until the British Telecom equipment has been supplied. So we have been testing the equipment provided by the smaller suppliers, to verify that it is fit for purpose. The crew would have erected the camera to test it and would then have removed it once the test was complete’. In answer to the comment that the camera was mysteriously removed overnight, Mr Allen said: ‘That’s quite possible. The crews start at 7.00am in the morning’.

Who are we to argue with this very rapidly provided official explanation for the fact that a camera, complete with numerous antennae, was suddenly erected and focused at our office building and then abruptly removed overnight, after we had reported this matter by telephone and indicated our curiosity by being photographed looking at the camera from all angles in the street?

• VISIT TO OUR LONDON OFFICE ON 3RD DECEMBER 2008 BY UK SPECIAL BRANCH:

Following the ‘triple gunshot voicemail’ [see the report dated 21st September 2008], the Editor reported this event, as requested by a contact, as a courtesy to the local police at Thame Police Station. The Editor was also advised to report that he had been told that there might be a hit squad ‘on the ground’ at the time. At no stage did the Editor mention Al-Qaeda (see below).

On 8th October, detectives from Kidlington visited the Editor’s wife in Buckinghamshire, unknown to the Editor, who had already departed for his trip to the United States scheduled for 9th October. Given the gravity of the ‘triple gunshot’ threat, the Editor had taken advice from several contacts, one of whom had proceeded to inform several UK agencies asking them to provide the Editor with some form of special protection. The Editor was met at Gatwick Airport by three operatives beyond passport control, who asked polite questions after checking the Editor’s identity.

The flight to Newark on 9th October was uneventful and the Editor’s overall trip in the United States, apart from the ‘Amtrak sequence’ when the Editor’s mobile phone communications were severely disrupted while the train was proceeding to Washington, DC, was likewise.

In late November, the Editor was informed by his wife of the visit by officers on 8th October, which information had not been conveyed to him (as she had thought the matter had been dealt with).

On ascertaining the name of the officer from his wife, the Editor contacted Detective Sergeant Duncan Gomm of Thames Valley Police, Kidlington, who picked up the call, said he was on the road and could the Editor call back in half an hour. The Editor returned the call in 40 minutes, which went straight to voicemail, and left his name and number.

At 5.13pm on Thursday 27th November 2008, Detective Constable King-Bishop left a message on our office voicemail returning the Editor’s call: could he please get in touch? At 8.50am on Friday 28th November, Detective Constable King-Bishop left another voicemail, asking the Editor to get in touch, which he did, and she then asked ‘if we can come and interview you’, which the Editor then agreed to. This interview took place today, after the Special Branch officers arrived at 12.45pm as indicated above. The Editor came down the stairs and thought that he observed, through the glass door separating the stairs from the lobby, the male officer place a recording machine in his pocket.

The Special Branch officers asked what information the Editor had provided to the Thame Police. The Editor described the triple gunshot voicemail that had been received on 18th September 2008, and pointed out that the female Police Constable at Thame Police Station would have known what the Editor had told her, so why was the Editor being asked this question?

Detective Constable King-Bishop then said that the female Police Constable had stated that the Editor had indicated that he had been told that there might be an Al-Qaeda cell in the area (close to our countryside location). The Editor stated that this was incorrect: the phrase used had been ‘a hit team on the ground’ (see 21st September report).

It was made clear to the Editor that the Police had done nothing to investigate the triple gunshot voicemail. They asked how many threats the Editor had received since he began this investigation, and he said: 16, all in the United States. There appeared to be little residual concern on their part about the nasty triple gunshot voicemail: but the visitors were anxious to make it clear to the Editor that it was they who had arranged for three personnel to be present at Gatwick when the Editor left for Newark on 9th October. Unexpectedly, an official had rechecked the Editor’s passport and had asked a few curious questions like: ‘How is the business going?’ ‘Have you been at all affected by the downturn?’, which have nothing to do with security. The Editor thought this was odd.

It then emerged that the real purpose of the visit was to persuade the Editor that a certain contact of his could damage the Editor’s reputation ‘which is very high’ (thanks for the compliment). Now the Editor has known this contact since the early 1990s, but had no links until about 2005, when contact was made again by chance, and the person concerned then found out that the Editor was investigating the criminal finance crisis about which he, too, was quite knowledgable.

Our links were then re-restablished, although there was a gap of about 18 months later, after the Editor had had to ‘educate’ the person concerned about his misapprehensions concerning certain high-level US officer-holders. Since the Editor has visited the United States innumerable times since 1977, he is better equipped to understand and know about the various personalities on the US stage than most British observers, and the Editor felt that this contact should understand this.

However when relations were ‘restored’ in 2008, the Editor had three occasions to discuss matters with this contact. The Special Branch officers asked how often the Editor had met this contact, to which the answer in 2008 was ‘three times this year’. It was on the third occasion, on 6th September 2008, that the Editor, by prior agreement, visited the contact and conveyed to him one Affidavit and certain crucial documents which he requested should now be conveyed to our Head of State or her very closest representatives. The Editor had been specifically requested by key US associates to convey these papers to our highest level, and proceeded to ask for this to be done.

He took immediate steps after that meeting to do just that, having commented: ‘This is very serious. I will have to get in touch with X’. We later ascertained that the documents which the US associates needed to be conveyed to our highest level had not only reached their destination, but also that the advice proferred by the Editor that accompanied these documents, had been accepted.

As a direct consequence, the real money (the $14 trillion) underpinning the illicit bankers’ carousel were placed into lockdown, which meant basically that if a single cent were to be encumbered, this would effectively amount to ‘an act of war’ (that may be an exaggeration, but the phrase shows how serious any such further interference with the $14 trillion loan money would be). The ‘lockdown’ had occurred during the week preceding the receipt by the Editor of the ‘triple gunshot voicemail’.

It transpired that the Special Branch officers were engaged in an attempt to discourage the Editor from having further communications with the aformentioned contact, who procured the delivery of the documents to the highest-level destination, whereupon the officers’ expressed ‘motivation’ for the meeting was stated several times: ‘The reason we are here Mr Story is that we are concerned for your reputation, which is very high, given your contacts with this person, who has a reputation as ‘an intelligence nuisance’. Of course it is up to you whom you associate with’.

Now when people say to the Editor ‘it is up to you’, this usually goes down like a lead balloon, as EVERYTHING is up to the Editor, not least given that, as the female officer pointed out, ‘you are completely independent’. Well, in the case of an individual who is completely independent, as the Editor is, by definition, everything is ‘up to him’. It is condescending and arrogant to say this. It is also somewhat threatening, implying that ‘you will regret it if you stay in touch’.

Detective Constable King-Bishop then asked: ‘Are you concerned at all for your own safety?’, and ‘Are you concerned at all for your wife’s safety?’

It has since been pointed out to the Editor that these questions can be interpreted as representing threats against the Editor and his wife, which is one of the reasons we are posting this somewhat tedious detail immediately here. In summary:

• Special Branch officers (Kidlington/Scotland Yard) asked whether the Editor was concerned about his own safety and that of his wife, and we have been advised that these comments are capable of a dual interpretation, one benevolent, and one threatening. Depending on WHO left the ‘triple gunshot threat’, this interpretation may or may not be pertinent.

• Special Branch officers (Kidlington/Scotland Yard) profess to be concerned about the Editor’s reputation, which they say with false flattery is ‘very high’. The only person who needs to be at all concerned about his reputation is the Editor of this service. It is no concern of Special Branch officers affiliated to Scotland Yard/Kidlington what the state of the Editor’s reputation may be.

• Special Branch officers (Kidlington/Scotland Yard) sought to discourage the Editor’s arms’-length occasional association with the aforementioned contact, on the ground that he is alleged (by them) to be ‘an intelligence nuisance’, notwithstanding the fact that after the meeting that was held at the contact’s home on Sunday morning 6th September, the contact proceeded at once to convey the documents to our highest state level, as requested by our US associates. In other words, the Editor took advantage successfully of his contact, with his agreement, to achieve what had to be done, and the contact performed 100% in accordance with expectations.

• Special Branch officers (Kidlington/Scotland Yard) rubbished the reputation and standing of our contact, saying in so many words that he is not what he cracks himself up to be, and that he has been ‘trading on the Editor’s reputation’. First, the Editor is the guardian of his own reputation and has noted no adverse effects from being associated with this contact whatsoever (not that many people know about this contact anyway). Secondly, whatever these UK Special Branch officers may allege, the proven fact (reconfirmed again today) is that when called upon to procure the delivery of sensitive documents to our highest level, the contact did precisely that. Which is what mattered.

• Special Branch officers (Kidlington/Scotland Yard) attempted repeatedly to rubbish the Editor obliquely by pointing out, for instance, that ‘you could have done the research yourself: you didn’t need to use your contact for the purpose of conveying those documents’. Which, by the way, the Special Branch officers asked to see; WHY WOULD THEY BE INTERESTED? The Editor refused to comply with that request, which was completely out of order here.

• Special Branch officers (Kidlington/Scotland Yard) also said that the Editor’s contact had got in touch with various agencies in the United Kingdom and had caused them to become engaged in a great deal of work on behalf of the Editor which was unnecessary. When the Editor asked whether the ‘work’ that had been done by these agencies had been in the Editor’s interest, he was told: Yes. If that was the case, how can such ‘work’ have been unnecessary? The ‘work’ was connected with measures taken to protect the Editor following receipt of the triple gunshot volicemail, which the visitors did not seem to be in the slightest concerned about.

• Special Branch officers (Kidlington/Scotland Yard) made no contact with the Editor of this service after visiting his wife on 8th October, until the Editor got in touch with THEM in late November. So what was the reason for the sudden urgent need to interview the Editor? If there had been a problem concerning the contact to which they object, they could have got in touch with the Editor shortly after his return from the United States at the end of October. Clearly, the phrase ‘damage limitation’ springs to mind. Another phrase that springs to mind is ‘frame up’, of both the Editor AND his valuable and helpful contact, who has received no remuneration, as is the case with all of us. A third pertinent phrase that spings to mind is ‘cover up’: see the main narrative.

• And yet another pertinent phrase that JUMPS OUT OF THE MIND is ‘fishing expedition’.

The Editor had pointed out that the triple gunshot voicemail had NOT left a print on the digital voicemail equipment, whereas the earlier and later voicemails were present, and that he had been led to believe that intelligence facilities possess the ability to wipe out digital voicemail messages, but that ‘ordinary mortals’ cannot do this. (Untrue, but that is what this overworked Editor thought at the time). The male Special Branch officer rubbished this interpretation, adding that ‘anyone could have left that triple gunshot voicemail message’, which did not concern him, as though this was of no residual interest, like the ‘gunshots threat’ itself. The Editor thought that the officers’ lack of interest in the gunshots threat was extremely peculiar: after all, he contacted the Police SPECIFICALLY because of the ‘triple gunshot’ voicemail, to ask for protection.

It then occurred to the Editor that this interview was becoming pointless, and that if the ‘triple gunshot’ voicemail was of zero relevance, quite possibly the Special Branch may KNOW who had perpetrated this threat and may indeed be engaged in a damage limitation exercise. The damage limitation had become necessary perhaps, because UK agencies had been activated by the Editor’s contact in October, which had interfered with the objective of the exercise, which MAY have been been to INTIMIDATE THE EDITOR of this service, given that our intervention on 6th September had procured the lockdown of the $14.0 trillion, with decisive consequences. And these two Special Branch officers now appeared themselves to be possibly intimidating the Editor when they asked those questions about whether the Editor fears for his own and his wife’s safety.

In conclusion, we have been advised to post this narrative so as to signal to those who may be concerned, that if you imagine that intimidating the Editor of this service will ever be liable to achieve whatever hidden motives may apply, you should take it on board that the Editor of this service is not about to become accustomed to submitting to threats. After having received 16 threats in the United States, he is well used to this kind of behaviour. If the Kidlington Special Branch think this interpretation is incorrect, they have out telephone number and coordinates.

• And by the way, they knew all about the criminal finance investigations and their implications.

We are grateful to these officers for what they have genuinely done for us, and for their time. We don’t take kindly to veiled threats, if these were intended, which we imagine cannot be the case.

APPENDIX:

THE EARLY ATTEMPT BY THE DVD-ORIENTED COMPONENT OF MI6 TO PUT A STOP TO THE EDITOR’S INVESTIGATIONS OF THE FINANCIAL CORRUPTION. IT HAD THE REVERSE EFFECT:

The following sequence, published on pages F-05 to F-08 of International Currency Review, Volume 34, #1, distributed worldwide at the end of November 2008, references conversations between the veteran journalist, Gordon Thomas, who boasted of close intelligence connections, and the Editor of this service, in 2004-2005, in which Gordon Thomas warned or threatened the Editor that certain elements ostensibly of UK intelligence had borne false witness against the Editor of this service by disseminating fatuous fabrications about the Editor’s supposed links to Mark Thatcher and Bernie Ecclestone, neither of whom the Editor has ever met and with whom he has never had anything to do, not least because your very own correspondent has done nothing at all in his working life since returning from Canada in 1961 except write and publish, and provide consultancy services, on his own account. This is a full-time 24/7 occupation which allows of no respite, especially as nowadays we also publish (and the Editor writes) books.

• So whoever dreamed up this tripe didn’t do his homework.

However given the huge momentum of the exposures, which have ‘blown’ this fraudulent finance and the involvement of criminal enterprise institutions and intelligence cadres in its perpetration, while exposing the rôles of DVD, Dachau, CIA-1, Frankfurt, Government Operations – 2 (GO-2), DVD chieftain George Bush Sr. and the other criminal elements who have been disturbing the peace of humanity and creating flashpoints around the world (such as in Bombay) to cover up their financial crimes, it would appear that elements of British intelligence later changed their opinion of what the Editor was attempting to achieve. At all events, their early intimidation operation fell flat.

This demonstrates the wisdom, perhaps, of walking in a straight line when investigating and exposing evil, since parties who zigzag cannot keep up with those who forge straight ahead.

The relevant passages from the latest issue of our financial journal, referencing conversations with Gordon Thomas, are as follows:

In the course of the conversation [in Bath, on that occasion], the question of MI6 and British intelligence interest in certain topics arose. It was in this context that the veteran journalist revealed that MI6 had informed him personally that your correspondent is or was involved with Mark Thatcher in connection with the botched coup to seize power and the oil assets in Equatorial Guinea. Observing Thomas’s own astonishment at this curious invention, your correspondent asked when he had heard ‘this nonsense about [my non-existent connection with] Mark Thatcher’.

At first he said that ‘oh, it was very recent, within the past two months’. (However in a telephone conversation on 19th November 2004, Gordon Thomas, who has close MI6 connections, shortened this time-frame to ‘within the past two weeks’, before correcting himself and saying that it may have been ‘within the past two months’. A bit hazy, he was).

Mr Thomas elaborated that his MI6 source(s) had reacted as follows when the Editor’s name had come up in conversation: ‘Oh yes, we know about him. Why revive him?’

We take this to be a reference to the fact that the Editor had published his early findings about this corruption in Volume 28, Number 4 of this service, back in March 2003. That issue alluded to, and illustrated some of, the ‘smoking gun’ financial payout documents made available to the Editor in June 2002. In other words, MI6 thought we had fallen asleep.

Separately, a Pentagon-linked operative had approached the Editor about some scam involving Bernie Ecclestone, a character with a murky background, explaining that he had been told (by MI6, it transpired) that the Editor had some involvement with this motor racing fellow, also a pack of lies. Both the Ecclestone and Thatcher fables were ‘supposedly’ fabricated by MI6.

GORDON THOMAS SPILLS THE BEANS
On later telephoning Gordon Thomas, in order to thank him for his time and hospitality on the preceding afternoon, your correspondent made his deduction of the link clear to him:

Editor: ‘It’s obvious that this mad fantasy about links with Mark Thatcher and the separate nonsense about Bernie Ecclestone comes from the same source, namely MI6’.

Gordon Thomas (as though he knew more than he was revealing): ‘That’s right’.

Editor: ‘Who did you obtain this [Mark Thatcher libel] tripe from:
were they high-up sources?’

Gordon Thomas: ‘I heard this very recently….Yes, one of them is [a high-up source]’.
I would describe the other as middle management’.

Editor: ‘So what makes them do something like this? What drives them to make up such ludicrous stories and lies, when they know they can’t make anything stick’ (since the whole pack of lies is a crude and clumsy invention)?

Gordon Thomas: [paraphrase]: ‘It’s not necessary for them to prove anything. All they need to do is to make allegations. That’s all they need to do’.

Editor: ‘So, what have they done with these lies?
Have they put these inventions out there to the press?’

Gordon Thomas: ‘Yes, it’s with the press, I understand’.

Gordon Thomas then proceeded in general terms to summarise the false story that MI6 had fed to the press about the Editor’s alleged (but totally non-existent) connections with Mark Thatcher and the failed Equatorial Guinea fiasco. In other words, MI6 were attempting to connect the Editor to this episode, of which of course the Editor know absolutely nothing except what we have read in the open press and on the Internet.

Editor: ‘Of course if any such allegations were to appear in print I would go to court at once. Presumably they realise that’.

The Editor reiterated that if any such false allegations were to be made in the press, he would go to court given that the suggestions are fabrications with no basis whatsoever in the real world. The Editor spends all of his time (24/7) preparing serials and books for publication; and as all who know him are aware, has no time for any other work activity of any kind, as has been the case since 1969.

Gordon Thomas then alluded to the fact that the newspapers concerned would have done their homework and would find that they could make no progress since there would be no connections to be unravelled; whereupon he said that it would not have been necessary for there to have been any substance to MI6’s lies: all that would be necessary to discredit the Editor in the eyes of the media would be to put this pack of lies ‘out there’.

FALSE WITNESS LIES, SO THAT THE ‘MAINSTREAM’ WOULD IGNORE IT
The motive would have been to ‘guarantee’ that if International Currency Review were ever to publish any information which might reveal serial official corruption on either side of the Atlantic or anywhere else, the British press would pay no attention (as has hitherto been the case). It was a classic intelligence frame-up.

In further conversation between the Editor and the veteran journalist, Gordon Thomas, it was carefully explained to the Editor that [paraphrase]:

• British and American intelligence are now so incestuously intertwined, and the foreign policy stances of the two Governments ditto, that there is hardly any difference between them.

• (No mention of DVD and Mossad, you notice: Ed.).

• A new second-term Bush Administration had been ‘elected’ on 2nd November and was anxious that ALL its requirements across the board would be complied with by the British authorities, as appropriate, in line with its familiar arrogant approach to the ‘Special Relationship’.

[In the same issue, on pages 41-58, we demonstrated conclusively that the 2004 election, like the election of 2000, was stolen, and we showed in part how this was done].

• It had been explained to the veteran journalist, Gordon Thomas, by MI6, that Washington had basically been pressurising them to ‘do something about Mr Story’. When your correspondent asked why on earth this was considered ‘necessary’, the veteran journalist continued [paraphrase]:

• ‘They think you may be dangerous* because you have the documents and you have control of publications through which information about the financial documents can be disseminated’.

[*Dangerous for what reason? Because we would be liable to expose their nasty corruption, their double-dealing, their open-ended abuse of power, and their treason, by any chance?]

Editor: ‘But they know perfectly well that others have these compromising financial documents…’. [The Editor then mentioned his knowledge that the editor of a prominent publication (Vanity Fair) held copies of the documents in the folder obtained by the Editor in Washington in June 2002].

Gordon Thomas: ‘Yes, but he probably can’t use them, or else is too frightened to do so (accurate: Editor), whereas you can, because the publications you publish are under your direct control’.

Editor: ‘So you are saying that MI6 know that there isn’t a controlling intelligence cell sitting in our ‘press room’, as is the case elsewhere, and are collaborating with the crude Forces of Darkness in Washington who want these financial scandals to remain covered up indefinitely, are you?’

Gordon Thomas: ‘In so many words, that’s what is intended, yes. And here’s what they said. They said: Tell Mr Story about what has happened to’ [adding the name of a well-known UK journalist who stepped out of line. The name of this journalist is known to the Editor]’. This was a threat to surface some wholly concocted ‘sleaze’ report about the Editor.

Gordon Thomas then explained that his MI6 contact(s) referred to photographs of this journalist stripped naked and indulging in some kind of satanic sexual orgy. He then added: ‘They are saying that if you expose these documents, or if they think you are going to do so, they will do everything in their power to discredit you. That way, when you publicise the damning information that you possess, no-one will believe you and the press will take no notice’. ATTEMPTED BLACKMAIL.

The second part of prediction has proved accurate. The press took no notice: but not because of the lies peddled by the criminal organisation calling itself MI6 (or was Gordon Thomas speaking on behalf of Mossad by any chance?), but actually because the ‘mainstream media’ didn’t keep up with events, didn’t do its due diligence, and was all too easily bamboozled by the spooks who fed them redirection ‘slides’ about the ‘cause’ of the problem being ‘sub-prime’ mortgages, which have of course existed ever since mortgages were first thought of. The ‘mainstream’ bought this bromide, and went to sleep for a year.

Consequently, the UK ‘mainstream media’, found wanting and caught short, have since been scrambling to ‘catch up’ with the unravelling Octopus scandal, with no reliable bearings to guide them. We cannot tell whether or not they ignored the evidence we have published since March 2003, on the basis (according to Gordon Thomas’s assessment) of a farrago of concocted rubbish about the Editor which has never even surfaced, despite these threats. They did not even amount to blackmail, because there was nothing in the lies to blackmail the Editor with. However Gordon Thomas behaved disgracefully in allowing himself to be used for this low purpose. Shame on you.

Naturally, the Editor exposed this clumsy attempted frame-up by publishing the complete narrative (on pages 27-39 of Volume 30, Numbers 2 & 3 [known as ‘The Green Book’)].

The BLACKMAIL AND FALSE WITNESS ‘warning’ sequence is concluded:

Editor: ‘This is all going rather further than the previous baseless allegations. Those were so absurd as to be almost demented: anyone who knows me is aware that I do nothing else, 24/7, but prepare our publications for press. How could I have time to mess about with this fellow Bernie Ecclestone, whom I have never met and would never wish to meet, in Monte Carlo, fooling around with motor cars which I know nothing at all about and in which I have never been interested; or with Mark Thatcher, whom I have never met or spoken to either, in some dark corner of Africa?’

‘When would I have time to do any of that, and why do they think I am so pushed for money that I would be tempted by such stupidity? In any case I never invest in anyone else’s ventures: only in my own, not least because I have no time for any other activity. If these stupid idiots had done their homework, they would know this: after all, I have been doing precisely the same thing since the 1960s, and our financial publications are well known in the global banking sector after all these decades. Furthermore our London offices are only round the corner: these people have feet.
They can walk…’.

Gordon Thomas: ‘Oh they wouldn’t do that. They’d have your telephones bugged. They listen to your phone calls. Why would they expose themselves? They want to expose you’.

Editor [thinking: Well, they have just exposed themselves, through you, Mister]:

‘If they are so very desperate, why don’t they liquidate me, like they have liquidated others, this being evidently one of their favourite pastimes? If they think I am so likely to expose their corruption, why don’t they just do that?’

Gordon Thomas: ‘Oh, they wouldn’t do that. it would be far too messy’.

Editor: (unspoken): ‘Oh, so the only reason they ‘wouldn’t do that’ is that it would be far too messy. So, if it wasn’t ‘far too messy’, they would, would they? They made a pretty messy job of poor Dr Kelly’ [the British microbiologist who, like more than 300 of his scientific colleagues around the world, have died mysteriously and violently in recent years because of their knowledge of secret population-reduction biological warfare technology that is being developed in order to rid the world, Himmler-style, of ‘undesirables’, and in Dr Kelly’s case, almost certainly because he knew about the clandestine operation orchestrated by the Bush/DVD apparat to equip Iran with nuclear materials. Dr Kelly was found ‘suicided’ in an Oxfordshire wood in 2003. His body was moved and the related cover-up appears to be unravelling right now, along with everything else.

[INSERTION: It is believed that the ‘triple gunshot warning’ that the Editor received in September 2008 [see Report, 21st September 2008] reflected a belief that we might reveal information about delivery of such materials, along with little girls, drugs and arms, using DVD-supplied submarines].

Editor: (spoken: paraphrase): ‘In revealing their dirty little hands like this, they are exposing themselves, which strikes me as being extremely dumb of them. They have shown their hand, thereby indicating to me that any exposure of these evils is indeed greatly to be feared, which signals to me loud and clear that it is all the more urgently necessary’.

Anyway, as a direct consequence of this clumsy early ‘MI6’ (according to Gordon Thomas: but was it?) intervention, the Editor was further encouraged to continue his enquiries. The correct way to have dealt with their ‘little problem’ would have been for someone from the intelligence services to have made an appointment to come to the Editor’s office across the River Thames, and to have appealed to the Editor on the basis of the old standards of gentlemanly honour. Sorry, we forgot: these people aren’t ‘gentlemen’ any longer. So they blow their cover, instead.

Notes and References:
(1) MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

(2). The derivatives data published by the Bank for International Settlements and the International Monetary Fund are, as the IMF states in its Global Financial Stability Report, all adjusted for double-counting. Specifically, notional amounts cited were adjusted by halving positions vis-à-vis other reporting dealers. This means that, taking the mid-October notional value of derivatives contracts outstanding calculated on this basis of $667 trillion, the unadjusted figure would be $1,334 trillion – very close to the figure that we have published in International Currency Review and in Economic Intelligence Review. Gross market values were calculated as the sum of the total gross positive market value of contracts and the absolute value of the gross negative market value of contracts with nonreporting counterparties.

(3) The observations about Gordon Brown’s possible origins extracted below from our report dated 18th June 2008 [see the Archive], which are also published on page 123 of International Currency Review, Volume 34, #1, distributed at the end of November 2008, are pertinent in this context. They immediately followed our paragraph about Brown travelling to Belfast to join President Bush and his wife again in the afternoon of the same day that he had already said goodbye to them in front of the TV cameras on the steps of Downing Street that same morning:

‘The Editor was most interested to observe, on page W2 of the Weekend section of The Daily Telegraph of Saturday, 14th June 2008, in a feature celebrating ‘Father’s Day’, which the British have never previously bothered with, a segment about Gordon Brown and his father. This showed a photograph of Mr Brown’s alleged father John standing in front of an old-style car in a traditional farmyard, with two small boys. The caption reads: ‘Moral compass: Gordon Brown (above left) at the age of two, with his father John and elder brother, John Junior’.

The images of the two little boys had clearly been cut out and then stuck onto the old background photograph. When such montages were made (using old technology), the lighting was liable to cast a dark shadow at some edges of the images stuck onto the background, given that the light casts a shadow round the raised edges in question.

This was clearly a doctored montage, as can be seen from the hard black edge around the left-hand side of the older boy’s face, his right thigh and his left shoulder, and the parallel hard (black) edge around the right ear of ‘Gordon’ and along his left shoulder and arm. This new discovery confirms the Editor’s long-held suspicion that the received ‘legend’ associated with the intelligence officer Gordon Brown may be ‘misleading’.

There are also similar indications that the father figure in this picture may likewise have been mounted onto this rural background image. If these observations are anywhere close to being accurate, there is no difference between Britain these days and the ‘former’ Soviet Union, which was adept at falsifying photographs in order to sustain false ‘legends’ or to reflect liquidations of key personnel. Furthermore, it may be usefully noted that Gordon Brown’s age corresponds to the timeframe of the Hungarian uprising in 1956’.

It is therefore speculated that Brown may be of Hungarian, possibly Ashkenazi Jewish, extraction, and may have been a ‘1956’ refugee baby brought to Britain during the Hungarian uprising period. This analysis is purely speculative and cannot be claimed to be authoritative.

REITERATION OF THE U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

BUSH, CHENEY AT CENTRE OF HUGE CORRUPTION STORM

CHENEY ASSOCIATES HAVE THEIR THROATS CUT AS BLOODLETTING ESCALATES

Wednesday 18 June 2008 19:53

ARROGANT ‘DARK FORCES’ SQUIRM AS THEY ARE FORCED TO FACE THE WORLD’S FURY

BLOODBATH IN THE WASHINGTON AREA DETERIORATES, AS WE FIRST PREDICTED IN 2006

CRASS EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT SOCIALISTS SHOUT DOWN M.E.P. OVER THE IRISH VOTE

CHENEY CAUGHT STEALING AGAIN, AS BUSH PLAYS YING-YANG WITH THE WORLD COURT

BUSH’S PERVERSE NOTION OF ‘UNIVERSAL VALUES’ EVALUATED, FOR THE RECORD

ABOMINATION IN THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND IS PART OF ATTACK ON THE MONARCHY

UPDATE, 19th June 2008: Conclusions are being jumped to on the basis of the report below in spite of what we have tried to convey about ‘real time’ reporting. Just as we must necessarily exercise caution and circumspection in order not to get caught in the wheels of the juggernaut, possibly interfering with its progress, so must the observer excercise the same qualities before jumping to conclusions. Information accumulated SINCE the timeframe of this report, if published now, would possibly precipitate developments that must be avoided, although these events may occur anyway.

But we cannot responsibly place ourselves in a position from which it could be argued that this service precipitated the events. Furthermore, the information currently to hand would NOT drive anyone to conclude that all is lost: far from it. On the contrary, the purpose of these reports has all along been to procure the necessary outcomes, while at the same time trying to avoid pre-empting processes in another country which HAVE to be handled by the relevant national authorities.

Hence, to jump to conclusions and get all worked up on the basis of incomplete information, given that these reports CANNOT BE ‘REAL-TIME’, is not good for either body or soul. Are matters being sorted? YES. Is the process very painful? YES. Will the Republic be better off after the resolution? YES. So, please, resist the temptation to run off down preconceived mental rabbit holes. Patience is a virtue which many sufferers have demonstrated, but you cannot force the pace of events. The juggernaut doesn’t need pushing. It has its own decisive momentum.

We can clarify one matter here. In the section below on the London safety lock boxes and vaults, the Editor mentioned that a quantity of gold dust was found. The Editor concluded, wrongly, that this gold dust represented the residue of melted down gold, thus exhibiting his ignorance of the process in question. Apparently gold dust settles where bars of gold have been located. So what this gold dust represented was the residue from stolen gold.

Whose gold was stolen back on 29th-30th March 2007 [see preceding reports]? Gold belonging to Her Majesty The Queen. Who facilitated and/or was associated with the theft of the Queen’s gold in collaboration with US criminalists on the British side? The former Prime Minister, Tony Blair. Is Tony Blair in a HOT SEAT ‘as we speak’? You can say that again. Also, Condoleeza Rice should have been included in the short-form list condensed from the five-page document containing the names of 142 criminalist operatives referred to below.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press ARCHIVE. Order your subscriptions and our ‘politically incorrect’, hence correct, intelligence books from the Edward Harle segment.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• NOTE: The Subs/Books panel on the Home Page is a means to enable us to communicate with subscribers, the purpose being to announce when issues of our serials have been published, and also to provide updated information on our Books. On 23rd May, the Editor appended an essay for the specific benefit of subscribers to International Currency review, the purpose of which was to inform them of progress on the publication of International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 3 & 4, which runs to almost 1,000 pages, and will provide a massive historical record/update with detailed documentation and related information on the worst financial corruption crisis in world history.

This private communication was lifted by another website and placed onto their space out of any context, causing some confusion. The reason for the confusion was that the information published in the second panel, though accessible to anyone, represents, as indicated, this Editor’s private
communications with subscribers to our printed intelligence publications. Therefore, what we say in the second panel is nothing to do with anyone other than our actual or potential subscribers.

• SPECIAL ORDERS FOR THIS ISSUE: The Editor will be emailing all who have kindly requested information on the cost and delivery of this mammoth presentation. The final sections are being printed in our factory ‘as we speak’. The promised emails will be sent out shortly.

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing financial global corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. The Editor’s $35,000 Wanta bail-out money has been stolen.

URGENT INSERTED NEWS FLASH: 18TH JUNE 2008:
The following brief report on the barbaric behaviour of brainwashed Members of the European Parliament, who shouted down Ashley Mote M.E.P. in the Parliament when he delivered a brief speech teaching them the meaning of the Irish NEIN, and instructing them in the rudiments of democracy, is inserted because of its importance as an indicator of the kind of Hitler/Stalin-type mentality we are dealing with. A big THANK YOU to the mental defectives who shouted Mr Mote down for telling them what they didn’t want to hear today. Your crude, childish, intolerant, unruly behaviour makes it CERTAIN that the British will insist on getting out from under your jackboots.

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT’S SOCIALISTS SHOUT DOWN ASHLEY MOTE ON THE IRISH VOTE
The Socialist block in the European Parliament today shouted down Ashley Mote, Independent, SE England, when he attempted to speak for one minute on the Lisbon Treaty after the Irish voted ‘No’.

Exceptionally, the President of the House made no attempt to call for order, despite the tradition that speakers are are at least heard, if not in silence. Ashley Mote’s largely unheard speech was:

“May I remind this House that the Rule of Law is far more important than laws themselves. Lisbon required unanimity. Ignore that and you ignore the Rule of Law.

The Irish are not just 10% of the EU. They are 100% of those allowed to vote. And we all know others would have said NO, given the chance.

They said NO despite threats, bullying, intimidation, the combined pressure of the media and all the political parties bar one. Lisbon was incomprehensible, and the Irish knew why.

Like many others elsewhere, they have seen through the deceit and subterfuge of the last 50 years. Suggesting that the process goes on, devising clever ways to re-package Lisbon in open defiance of widespread opposition, is an insult, an outrage, arrogance of breathtaking proportions.

We’ve seen it all before, of course, when the Constitutional Treaty was voted down. The Austrian Foreign Minister then boasted that the 36 institutions and projects depending on the [discredited] Constitutional Treaty for their legitimacy were still going ahead.

Lisbon will now give them no legitimacy, either. They are unlawful and must be abandoned or abolished. Democracy is about people making choices, whoever they are… and whatever they decide. I relay a message from Edmund Burke of some 200 years ago:

THE PEOPLE ARE THE MASTERS, NOT YOU”.

Editor’s comment: Mr Mote, a friend of the Editor’s, is much too polite. These people are the dregs of political life, has-beens in their own countries, ‘former’ Communists, collectivists of every hue, people whose brains are addled with dead ideology, gutless fellow travellers with no capacity to think for themselves, parasites, placemen, retreads from whom no-one would buy a used car: in short, the political scum of the earth. Their behaviour sends a clear signal to Britain: GET OUT.

• Note: the Editor will be a guest of Mr Mote at the European Parliament in Brussels next week.

• IMPORTANT: This report was compiled on the basis of information obtained between Thursday 12th and Wednesday 18th June. Certain developments occurred in the evening of Tuesday 17th and Wednesday which appear to represent an escalation of the game of bluff being played out at the highest levels of the US Government. We have a standing constraint that we cannot report on ‘real time’ events both because the full picture may not have emerged, and further because it is incumbent upon us not to ‘get in the way’ or to report on sensitive matters which must take their course. However we are flagging these unreportable developments now, as they may illuminate some of the necessarily incomplete older information published below.

LONDON, 18th June 2008:

A CHENEY CONFERENCE CALL AND ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENTS
At around 11.45pm on Tuesday 17th May, we were advised as follows:

• Cheney stole the money again [see outline conjectures below].

• Cheney was ordered to pay it back.

• In the course of this recent sequence, several Bank of America bankers were arrested. This appears to be what the eavesdroppers didn’t want us to publish, which is curious given that 7,000 bankers were arrested last autumn, and there have been spasmodic waves of such arrests ever since. However a moment’s thought reveals why ‘they’ won’t have wanted this fact to appear in this report: the identity of the bank directly implicates DVD-George H. W. Bush who remains the prime criminalist mover, the Wizard of Oz behind the curtain, with Cheney, his primary handler, hitherto implementing Bush Sr.’s kleptostrategy but insanely jealous and desirous to seizing everything he can for himself. [Cheney’s circumstances may have ‘changed’ abruptly over the past 24 hours].

(Nobody who is not sitting on their brains outside the United States can understand why Bush Sr. has not long since been arrested or worse – the only possible explanation for this inaction being that the long-range pan-German Nazi penetration throughout the US structures, and the associated internal divisions and power struggle are so deep and intense, that cutting off the master head of the serpent has hitherto been precluded. We have to say that in May 2003, Delmart Marc Vreeland, who predicted the 9/11 atrocities in advance, accurately informed the Editor, in a hotel in Canada, that the world’s problems are largely attributable to George Herbert Walker Bush Sr.

Whatever the other side of his split MK-ULTRA-type personality may represent, Vreeland clearly, in this Editor’s opinion, which has not changed over time, understood the geopolitical realities of the situation. He correctly identified the source of the world’s problems and his assessment has been fully borne out by the underlying Nazi documentation).

We believe that the events referred to above took place either on Monday 16th June, or on the 17th June 2008. In the course of being informed of these events, our transatlantic communications were severed not once, but twice.

The information seems mundane enough, doesn’t it. But consider the background that follows.

On Friday 13th June, when criminalist President George W. Bush Jr. was in Paris, the President placed a telephone call to Vice President Cheney (who seemed to have emerged from the various misadventures to which he has been subjected as a consequence of his serial criminality).

Several weeks ago, the corrupted US legislature passed a law authorising the US Department of Homeland Security to provide the Vice President of the United States with special protection. The immediate consequence of this was that a contract was placed by Chertoff with Blackwater, which now surrounds Cheney with thugs and gunmen, just like a Soviet oligarch.

In fact there is no qualitative difference here: Mr Cheney is indistinguishable in type from Mikhail Fridman, Boris Berezovsky, Mikhail Khodorkovsky in his heyday, Viktor Vekselberg, Semen Kukes, Leonard Blatavnik, Alexander Berman, Chalva Tchigirinski, Pyotr Aven, Roman Abramovich, or any of the other notorious Soviet kleptocrats we know about.

Prior to wangling his greatly expanded entourage of thugs, Cheney had tried to recruit the Italian mafia to provide him with the protection he evidently needs so badly.

Because one thing’s for sure: he could hardly appeal to the Chicago underworld for protection, could he, since elements of that community have been beside themselves with fury for more than a year at Cheney’s thievery and duplicity.

The call placed by Bush to Cheney from Paris consisted of Bush screaming at Cheney [paraphrase]:

‘ I have to pay or I’ll be arrested’.

Cheney: ‘That’s your problem. You gave me a Power of Attorney two months ago to handle these financial matters and I’ll do as I like’.

Deferring to Chief Justice John Roberts, who was in on this conference call, Cheney asked Roberts to confirm that he (Roberts) holds the Power of Attorney, which he did.

Bush: ‘I have to see The Queen and Brown tomorrow and they’ll want to be certain we’ve paid, or either they won’t let me go, or I’ll be arrested on arrival back home’.

Cheney: ‘I can prove to you that no-one will touch you’.

EITHER A BITTER TOP-LEVEL DISPUTE OVER STOLEN FUNDS, OR A YING-YANG CHARADE
This, at least, was the gist of the phone call. Subsequently it became clear that the call was actually about Cheney’s theft of the pertinent cash funds. The way this may have been done is discussed below. Sticking to the main events first, it will be recalled that a severe power outage occurred in Washington, DC, on Friday 13th June. According to one source, Cheney informed Bush during this period, which may have coincided with the call, that he (Cheney) was now in full charge of the US Government, controlled all communications, and there was nothing that Bush could do about it.

This interpretation appears to have represented a flight of fancy built upon the solid fact of Bush’s Power of Attorney to Mr Cheney. By means of this document, Bush actually resigned his position as President of the United States. However, as we all know, these deceivers are disciples of Lenin in the sense that they follow Lenin’s methodology of signing documents and making statements with the specific intention of reneging on any such undertakings as soon as the ‘correlation of forces’ so necessitates. In Bush’s case, this always means ten minutes later.

The first point to be noted about the conference call is that, since the gist of the conversation was leaked, it must have been at least partly staged. After all, this is the same technique that was used by Bush and Paulson in 2006 and 2007, when each said on various occasions that they had ‘signed off’ on the payments, while the other blocked them, and vice versa.

It’s called YING and YANG, or ‘backy-forthy’ (standard CIA criminalist procedure). However there was also another element – namely, that George W. Bush really was under pressure this time: he had to get through three days in the presence of Brown and The Queen unscathed, without raising their suspicions that he and Sarkozy had taken a huge cut form the funds (see below) and without allowing the British to deduce that Bush had no intention of paying. Bush Jr. appears, on the face of it (notwithstanding that his Dark Acting skills are highly sophisticated) to have been genuinely concerned about what might happen, although given his hardened schizophrenia, he displayed a posture of supreme confidence and arrogance throughout his recent European visit.

SEVERE MEASURES START TO BE TAKEN AGAINST CHENEY: MORE BLOODLETTING
But while Cheney may have imagined that he was firmly in the driving seat and could continue having his criminalist associates at Bank of America (a most corrupt CIA criminal enterprise) carry on stealing and diverting funds, i.e. ‘corrupt business as usual’, he encountered a few problems.

Since Cheney appears to be ‘perfectly possessed’ (such an infested human being can be identified by his total lack of emotion and the absence of any expression on his face at all times) what then followed will have caused him no concern whatever.

But others will not have shared his cynical lack of concern, especially those who may have been accustomed to doing Cheney’s corrupt bidding and may anticipate that their services may still be needed in future: such people may suddenly no longer be available for this monster to use.

Specifically, in the course of whatever happened in DC on Friday 13th June 2008:

• Two of Cheney’s operatives or associates were shot dead at point blank range.

• Tim Russert, the broadcasting executive, died suddenly at 1.20pm, ostensibly from a heart attack.

Later, either on Sunday 15th or Monday 16th June 2008, which was the date when a further 72-hour ‘immunities’ extension authorised by the World Court expired, the overdue Settlement payments having been required to be completed by the end of the 72 hours (Friday to Monday morning), two of Cheney’s closest associates, who were involved in the systematic stealing and diversion of funds, were murdered.

What happened was that they had their throats cut: that is all we have been able to find out. After their throats had been cut, Cheney received a telephone call conveying this information, in which he was asked: ‘DO YOU UNDERSTAND?’.

It is also believed that at a crucial juncture of this sequence, certain highest-level US criminalists (identities currently uncertain), confronted with the absolute necessity of delivering the Settlement payments, and with substantial amounts of money having been illicitly creamed off the top in the course of corrupt deals transacted during Bush’s European trip, had the temerity to contact certain foreign parties whom they had fleeced and stolen from for decades, to ask for their assistance in providing funds for a period of several hours, so that obligations could be met.

It is further understood that the American criminalists were given, appropriately, the very sharpest possible brush-off. Mind you, since these people are so insensitive as to call up important foreign counterparties they have repeatedly scammed in the past, this will not have phased them either.

OUR PREDICTION OF A BLOODBATH BACK IN 2006 IS BEING REALISED: IT MAY GET WORSE
Separately, during the week ending Friday 13th June 2008, a senior Halliburton executive involved in the endless criminality and scamming (given that Halliburton is a criminal enterprise), suffered the terrible underworld retribution of having his grandchildren murdered.

According to the reliable source for this information, this was too much for this man, and he then ‘rolled over’ on Cheney, although we do not have further details.

Hence, it can be deduced that the special protection that Cheney has selfishly erected around his foul person by courtesy of the armed Blackwater mercenaries and thugs, has simply made life more dangerous for anyone associated with this hideous oligarch. Because Unterreichsführer Cheney is currently protected by this wall of armed thugs (who have been seen accompanying him on several occasions recently) his enemies, who are legion, are today picking off his closest associates and their family members instead. This is typical of the darkest recesses of the criminal underworld, to which Cheney belongs. Furthermore, we predicted such an outcome in 2006.

WASHINGTON MAY WIND UP WITH A REVOLUTIONARY BLOODBATH IF THIS CONTINUES
We will now go so far as to elaborate the following prediction: Washington may soon descend, like ancient Rome and the Papacy at the height of their decadence, into an open-ended bloodbath and an uncontainable disintegration of the sinews of the Government, if this crisis is not resolved.

The predictions we first posted on 2nd September 2006 about what would happen economically as a consequence of this endless financial criminality have been largely borne out by events, taking the complacent ‘mainstream’ media and the highly-paid punditry by surprise. The same may happen with our prediction of a bloodbath, from which we may be only days away. Let’s hope we’re wrong.

There are grotesque divisions between Dark Forces throughout the structures inside the Beltway, between the holders of the highest offices and their greedy predecessors, within the notoriously criminalised intelligence services, inside the CIA’s criminal enterprise banks, and also inside law enforcement which seems paralysed in the face of the brazen intransigence of these criminals.

Certain well-known figures may not be heard of again, we have been told.

BUSH AGAIN APPEARS TO DECEIVE THE WORLD COURT
On Monday 16th June, President George W. Bush sent legal representatives to the World Court, where he pleaded that it was not his responsibility to make the payments, as he had handed that responsibility two months earlier over to Vice President Cheney via his Power of Attorney. Under US law, a Power of Attorney can be rescinded or overwritten or declared null and void due to any abuse of such a power associated with fraud or injury – a point immediately picked up, we believe, by the World Court, which is assumed to have thrown out his Petition. It was made because Bush had walked through the 72-hour ‘immunities’ extension without having made the payments, which he had implicitly blamed on Vice President Cheney, to whom he said he had delegated his powers to effect the payments. But of course, this further non-payment had reflected the crude fact that funds had again been stolen – by Cheney. It also, we suspect, reflected the standard dialectical methodology used 24/7 by these criminalists, which has been in evidence all along.

In having his lawyers plead his case at the World Court in order to gain more time given the expiry of the 72-hour ‘immunities’ extension, Bush deceived the Court because he knew that Cheney had already stolen the money. For this alone he should be arrested.

(Certain developments made known to us on 18th June place these extraordinary developments in perspective: but they are too ‘real time’ to be publicised at this critical juncture).

On the one hand, Bush had screamed down the line at Cheney that since Mr Cheney was again blocking the payments, he (Bush) was liable to be arrested; while three days later, Bush’s lawyers were arguing before the World Court that making the payments was not President Bush’s problem because he had delegated his powers in this respect to Vice President Cheney. This is a perfect example of the familiar duality, double-mindedness, duplicity and two-faced Leninist behaviour of these world class official criminals.

BUSH WENT DOWN LIKE A LEAD BALLOON IN THE UNITED KINGDOM, WE HEAR
In the course of Bush’s subsequent encounters in Britain (which were bordering on the frigid, we understand), the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, agreed to handle the public relations dimension, to make everything look good for the President, provided the Settlements were completed before Bush left for home (via Northern Ireland). This explained the repulsive pictures of President Bush, with his arm on the shoulder of Brown’s wife and on Brown’s back, while Mr Brown kisses Laura for the benefit of the stupid press and TV cameras massed outside Number Ten Downing Street, which graced our newspapers on Monday morning, 16th June.

In reality, Bush’s encounters with The Queen and her Prime Minister, though cordial at all times, were somewhat distant, as can be imagined. Bush may have cut secret deals with the phoenix Prime Minister of Italy, with the German Pope, with the Establishment in Slovenia, and with Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, in addition to the ‘haircut’ that he is believed to have agreed with France’s President Sarkozy. But when he arrived in Britain, there was no such possibility.

On the contrary, he knew that he would be lucky to be allowed to land in the United States without having been arrested on landing, or being confined to a dank dungeon in Northern Ireland. We were explicitly told from the United States, and not from our usual sources, that Bush would be arrested if the Settlements had not been completed when he left the United Kingdom.

Notwithstanding all of this, and much more, the payments had not been made, in the United States, at least, by nine p.m. British time on Wednesday 18th June. They were supposed to begin at one minute past five EDT in New York on the Tuesday. President Nicolas Sarkozy is said to have had a ‘meeting’ with “someone’”, believed to have been representatives of Interpol and possibly MI6, probably on Monday, in the course of which it was made clear to this criminal operative that he, too, needed to replace stolen money forthwith, given that any failure to do so at once would be liable to result in his immediate arrest.

It was thought possible (in the evening of 18th June, UK time), that President Bush had been able to fly back to the United States because certain payments may have been effected in Europe. This assessment was strengthened by the information about momentous developments monitored on 18th June which we were constrained (see above) from elaborating ‘in real time’.

PAPERS EXCHANGED BETWEEN BUSH AND SARKOZY IN PARIS ON FRIDAY 13TH
During the dinner attended by President Bush with Sarkozy in Paris on Friday 13th June, papers were exchanged which we interpret below as providing for a massive ‘haircut’ for both parties to the agreement. Obviously we don’t know precisely what happened, but what IS known by us is that Cheney had blown up earlier because whatever was agreed to, tapped into the vast store of Euros into which the dollar funds stolen by Mr Cheney in collusion with and on behalf of George Bush Sr., but almost certainly by now mainly for his own account, had been converted.

Cheney sub-accounts held with Paribas were in focus. Whether Bush Jr. helped Cheney steal the funds by having them repatriated via the closed US Federal Reserve Interbank Settlement Fund, which is a publicly unaudited, closed, controlled enterprise, or else had to replace funds stolen by Cheney, is unknown. The likelihood is that Cheney had stolen the cash-cash money (which is what they were all after) and that President Bush’s screams on the transatlantic telephone line, though partly representing play-acting for dialectical effect, placed Cheney on the spot, despite the Vice President’s bravado. That Cheney stole the money is quite evident from the fate that befell two of his people on Friday, and a further two close associates on Sunday or Monday (see above).

Cheney’s son-in-law Philip Perry, has been up to his neck in these criminal financial operations, so it would not be surprising if he turns out to have been one of the gentlemen who came too close to a sharp knife. However that is conjecture.

At all events, this game of YING-YANG definitely went wrong on Friday 13th June. Let us pause here to make the following important point. The known fact that key representatives and structures of the international community are corrupt like Mr Bush is, does NOT mean that these people are in harmony. How could that EVER be the case?

On the contrary, since Satan, their god, is the author of lies and confusion, it is the norm for them to be at loggerheads with each other, like rats in a sack. When their interests may coincide, they are capable of putting up a fine display of ‘unity’ for the cameras. But the glue underlying such displays of harmony is liable to shatter at any time. Do not, therefore, be dismayed when, all of a sudden, new alliances spring up out of nowhere. Only understand WHY they are happening.

The new ‘alliance du jour’ is that between President Sarkozy (whose shoes have elevated heels, did you notice, so that this little fellow’s diminutive height is raised) and the United States.

It was in France, not Britain, that Mr Bush, in buoyant schizophrenic form, delivered himself of a ‘major policy speech’, in which he referred to La France as ‘America’s first friend’, according to a sycophantic interview in The Observer, London, on 15th June. Upon what is this ‘first friendship’
predicated, do you suppose?

Uh, on a deal perpetrated, as suggested above, on the ‘backside’ during dinner in Paris on 13th June when Presidents Sarkozy and Bush exchanged corrupt documents supposedly authorising the final release of the Settlement funds while simultaneously awarding themselves and their own cronies a massive ‘haircut’ which will enable the off-balance sheet, untaxed, high-yield investment programme carousel based upon leverage and hypothecation, to start all over.

PARIBAS TO BUY BANK OF AMERICA BROKERAGE UNIT
The clue as to what was agreed appeared in The Wall Street Journal on 11th June [page C3], in a report under the headline: ‘Paribas to buy BofA Brokerage Unit’. It stated that:

‘BNP Paribas will spend as much as $300 million to acquire the equity prime-brokerage business of Bank of America Corp. in an attempt to strengthen its position in the derivatives market’.

‘The unit has 300 employees across the United States and in London and provides brokerage services to about 500 hedge funds’.

So, if we all thought that the carousel and the derivatives poison had been cauterised, we must all think again. Far from screeching to a grinding halt, the exotic fiat money carousel has been thrown a lifeline and will restart, so to speak, in parallel with and as the price of, payment of the Settlement money (or, just as much to the point, without any Settlement if the criminalists continue to think that their ‘backy-forthy’ dialectical obfuscation gimmick will see them through to the new Presidency).

Except that this deal actually ‘haircuts’ the Settlements money behind the backs of the payees, and procures colossal secret ‘backside’ payments to the top criminalists. That, essentially, is what may have been exchanged when Presidents Bush and Sarkozy dined in Paris on Friday 13th, although the accord was pulled off in the face of a crisis at the highest levels of the US Government that almost led to the whole thing erupting into the public domain [see above].

Paribas, it will be recalled, is the Paris-based vehicle used by the Bushes and Paulson through BNL, Hong Kong, to conduct exotic fraudulent finance transactions in the past. The use of Paribas is also significant because Cheney, working for Bush Sr., and as the handler for Bush Sr. himself, has been shorting the dollar on a colossal scale and accumulating, through his fraudulent finance operations, vast stashes of Euros for profiteering purposes, a habit that was regalvanised with the arrival of the Illuminati’s chosen representative in France, President Sarkozy.

He is described thus because the Editor has been specifically informed by a contact in touch with Illuminati sources that ‘Sarkozy has a big role to play for the Illuminati, who put him there’.

That figures: look at the man’s face, and his choice of wife: she openly brags that she was what most people would call a prostitute.

The BNP/Paribas deal may have been all about the Bush Jr. and Sarkozy helping themselves to their huge cut by trying to divert Euros accumulated by Cheney et al., thereby compromising the
Settlements, and short-changing them not only for self-enrichment purposes, but also to provide the ‘seed money’ to ensure that the old carousel mechanism will survive the massive shocks and upheavals that have rocked it to its foundations since June 2006. The carousel will, we suspect, emerge, phoenix-like, via the 500 hedge funds mentioned in The Wall Street Journal’s article, as though nothing had happened.

THE HEDGE FUNDS ARE THE AUTHORISED ‘VENTING MECHANISM’
It will be recalled that the June 2007 Group of Eight Meeting decided that the hedge funds were sacrosanct: they could not be touched. In other words, via this typically two-faced, double-minded, duplicitous decision, they provided for the emergence of a new two-tier system – consisting of the overt system, subject to disciplines including those imposed by Basel-II and the 1933 and 1934 US Securities Acts (the regulations of which are at long last starting to be enforced again, following our excoriating criticism of the failure of the US authorities to enforce the securities regulations); and a covert, hidden system for secret financial operations, including the gross techniques that have generated colossal volumes of unsupported ‘virtual’ currency, and for political bribery, self-enrichment, and continuing the financing of the corrupt World Government project.

In other words, the hedge funds are collectively the ‘vent’ that has been left open in the system, to enable this open-ended financial corruption to CONTINUE, while the rest of the financial system is
subjected to the disciplines imposed by Basel-II, which the American banks are being compelled to adhere to after they have put their books and affairs in order by the end of the 100-day deadline of 29th August 2008. By allowing this ‘venting’ arrangement to be perpetuated following any belated Settlements, the Bushes and their corrupt associates, led by President Nicolas Sarkozy, ‘America’s first friend’, are ensuring as follows:

• That the system of self-enrichment and financing for the discredited World Revolution by means of fraudulent finance, which we have exposed, will continue into the future.

• That, accordingly, any resolution of the Settlements will not be ‘the end of the matter’, but will be followed in the years ahead by the accumulation of a further gigantic and destabilising overhang of virtual non-money, leading to the certainty of a financial collapse worldwide, as opposed to the near-collapse we are now enduring or may, by the narrowest of squeaks, have managed to avoid.

• That the key players in Europe are being recompensed via the ‘backside’. Look who Dubya visited in Europe, prior to seeing The Queen: Chancellor Merkel (Deutsche Bank); the Pope (Vatican Bank); Sarkozy (BNP/Paribas, which has been at the receiving end of the stolen Bush Sr./Cheney Euros.

PRESIDENT BUSH’S ‘UNIVERSAL VALUES’
George W. Bush has stated that he will step down at the end of his term and will embark upon a project to promulgate ‘universal values’. For ‘universal’, kindly read ‘consistent with the globalist hegemony objectives of the World Revolution, of which I am proud to have served as the leader’.

The Observer, an international socialist newspaper published in the British capital, stated on 15th June 2008 that President George W. Bush Jr. intends to build a Presidential Library with a ‘Freedom Institute… aimed at promoting the universal values that need to be defended’.

The mind boggles. What are the ‘universal values’ that Dubya Bush’s ‘Freedom Institute’ will be promoting? They will surely have to include the following, at a minimum:

• It’s Okay to order the 9/11 atrocities knowing that 30,000+ people will die in the course of the preplanned demolition of the Twin Towers alone, and to use technology derived from weapons of mass destruction to do so, in order to generate the ‘necessary’ Hitlerian ‘Reichstag Fire’ event to be used as a pretext for invading Afghanistan in order to re-establish total undisputed control over the heroin poppy crop, and then Iraq in order to seize the Central Bank of Iraq, its assets and those of Saddam Hussein’s private institution (Rafidain Bank), and all the country’s oil assets, so that the price of oil can continue to be falsified through the operation of the external oil corporation price cartel for which the CIA ‘works’.

• It’s Okay to falsify all subsequent ‘blowback’ responses, including falsely managing the grief and expectations of the families of the 9/11 victims, and evidence to be considered and published by a controlled ‘whitewash’ commission set up for the specific purpose of managing the fall-out from the 9/11 atrocities, in the knowledge that the truths underlying these abominations can be made to ‘go away’. Goebbels taught that people soon believe lies, and we have learned from him.

• It is Okay to invade and usurp the sovereignty of another country when you covet its oil.

• It’s Okay to murder 1.5++ million of its inhabitants and to reduce 25% of its population to the ranks of the dead, the wounded, the deprived, the bereaved, and for an estimated two million of them to be reduced to abject poverty as refugees. Asked by The Observer what he thought that his legacy might be, Bush suggested that ‘the liberation of 50 million people from the clutches of barbaric regimes is noteworthy, at a minimum’. The population of Iraq as of June 2006 was 28.51 million. The population of Afghanistan is currently unknown, but that country has no more been ‘liberated’ than has Iraq (much less so). Mr Bush had also conveniently forgotten (as had the British newspaper’s interviewer, clearly) that Bush is on record as having recently described figures like the King of Saudi Arabia as ‘barbarians’, in the course of his propaganda for ‘democracy’ in the Middle East [see our further comment on his ‘democracy’ drive in the region, below].

• It’s Okay to invent tall stories to rationalise an illegal invasion in order to cover up the reality that its purpose was to seize the Central Bank of Iraq and its assets, and subsequently to seize the fiat assets of former financial trading partner Saddam Hussein.

• It’s Okay to authorise the deliberate liquidation of 100+ (probably very many more) special US operatives who were engaged in the seizure of the Central Bank of Iraq, so as to destroy those involved and thus preventing the truth of this atrocity from emerging into the public domain.

• It’s Okay to authorise, legitimize and perpetrate barbaric torture practices replicating Nazi-style behavior in gross, knowing breach of the Geneva Conventions, and to fabricate false, spurious legal rationalizations for doing so.

• It’s Okay to commit treason almost every day, to perpetrate open-ended financial fraud, to lie through both sides of one’s face, to demand cuts from transactions involving stolen funds, to blackmail domestic and foreign leaders, to order assassinations (by shooting or poisoning) and to commit other outrages for which the statutory penalties in the United States are death by lethal
injection. (That should not worry him, as he presided over 151 executions while Governor of Texas, more than any other State Governor in history: and it is on the open record that he rejoiced in the prospect of the deaths that he was inflicting).

• It’s Okay to attack a sovereign country on the basis of a false prospectus, to lie to the nation on the basis of that false prospectus, to disregard evidence that weapons of mass destruction were removed from the country (via the two Russian ships that sailed from the Iraqi port of Umm Qasr a few weeks prior to the March 2003 invasion) and to perpetuate that basic deception with devious obfuscations such as the following statement from Bush’s interview with The Observer: ‘We didn’t realise, nor did anyone else, that Saddam Hussein felt like he needed to play like he had weapons of mass destruction’. No harm, presumably, in implicitly blaming the intelligence community for its
incompetence, given that the so-called intelligence community is itself the co-author of these lies, deceptions and illicit operations.

• It’s Okay to freeze a reported $50 billion of Iraq’s money (but we think vastly more than this) with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in order to maximise pressure on the Iraqi Government into signing a coveted treaty granting the United States 58 permanent bases in the occupied country
(compared with the current 30 bases), not merely in order that the United States can control Iraq’s oil in perpetuity, but also so that the US kleptocracy can be permanently embedded inside Iraq ready to seize Iran’s oil resources and contracts that it lost back in the 1950s.

• It’s Okay to ponce around the Middle East preaching ‘democracy’ after having presided over the stealing of two General Elections through the rigging of electronic voting machines and software. In this respect the Bush II Administration is no better than a ‘former’ Soviet Republic – resembling
Georgia under Shevardnadze (known there as ‘Stalin II’), when ballot boxes were brought already pre-stuffed to the polling stations even under the noses of Western ‘election monitors’ bribed to certify in writing that the election had been fair, with a contradictory minority report attached.

• It is Okay to steal billions and trillions of dollars belonging to others, to subvert and suborn the banking system, to bribe legislators, to ‘legitimise’ fraudulent finance by not only condoning it but also participating in it on a grand scale, to treat the holding of the highest office as an opportunity to make trillions on the side, to connive with corrupt foreign leaders to help oneself to more stolen funds whenever such an opportunity arises, to pontificate about ‘universal values’ while stamping upon every ‘value’ except those of his master, Lucifer, and then obfuscating the immense damage that he has inflicted upon humanity by having his staff arrange for well-known sycophantic British journalists to be on hand on Air Force One, in Rome, in Paris, at breakfast, wherever, to record every nuance of his serial lies and obfuscations, as he attempts to fine-tune his ‘legacy image’ in the knowledge that, thanks to his apparatus’s control over the corrupted US Fourth Estate, the general population will have ‘forgotten’ his depredations by November 2008, and knowing that it is neither here nor there who wins the forthcoming election, since the criminalised US intelligence community will win and will remain in charge.

• It’s Okay to treat the families and the closest relatives of bereaved American soldiers with hard-hearted contempt (until it was pointed out to him that he’d better clean up his act in this respect, as the reports of his indifference were being disseminated far and wide).

• It’s Okay to steal computers equipped with foreign spying software and to hawk them for cash to foreign users in an organised ‘open day’ sales operation inside the White House itself. for the sole purpose of self-enrichment.

• It’s Okay to squander taxpayer funds on illegal wars and to re-bribe corrupted US legislators with stolen money to maintain the necessary cover-ups.

• Since the CIA is a den of iniquity, it’s perfectly Okay to subvert and steal from the CIA itself, and to do the same from inside the Pentagon, by procuring and perpetuating the old Luciferian practice of profiting from fabricated wars, by installing a controlled criminal enterprise (Halliburton) inside both the structures for the specific purpose of scamming, stealing and profiteering from fabricated wars and fabricated rumours of wars, and to fleece the government and the US taxpayer 24/7 in the process, on the assumption that any impeachment process will be subverted (as is happening).

• It’s Okay to steal The Queen’s gold and to play with it for over four months (until we advocated kicking the US Ambassador out of London), and later to compromise $6.2 trillion of British funds placed with Citibank, largely (it is believed) in the name of The Queen, and to connive in repeated
deception operations aimed at diverting or stealing that ‘replacement’ cash-cash money with the firm intention of stealing it, as with all the other huge sums he has stolen.

• It’s Okay to continue stealing and diverting funds right the way through to the present, using the notorious controlled criminal enterprises Bank of America, Citibank and JPMorganChase and the closed-end Federal Reserve Interbank Settlement Fund for the purpose.

• It’s Okay to make repeated verbal promises and repetitively to sign documents, including Powers of Attorney, without having the slightest intention of ever honouring them, and then to renege on all such undertakings well before the ink of the presidential ballpoint pen has dried on the useless pieces of paper in question. In this respect, Herr George W. Bush, Unterreichsführer Cheney et al behave exactly like V. I. Lenin, whose revolutionary (i.e., going round and round in circles) modus operandi included reaching accords with the ‘bourgeoisie’ with the full prior intention of reneging on them ‘whenever the correlation of forces so required’. In other words, as well as behaving like the Nazi that he is, Bush Jr. is a consummate Leninist: which need cause us no surprise at all, since National Socialism and International Socialism are two sides of the same Illuminati coin.

• On page 551 of the Editor’s book, The New Underworld Order, is an illustration of an early Nazi Labour Day Emblem, showing the head of Karl Marx, a hammer and sickle, and the usual’ spread-eagle’ borrowed from the death-worshipping religion of the ancient Egyptians, that is sitting on an orb within which is depicted a swastika. [See the intelligence books section].

• It’s Okay to hold up the global Settlements ad infinitum on the basis of the ‘never-Pay’ model that his evil father perfected with the assistance of Dr Alan Greenspan, the most corrupt US financial official in history, for personal enrichment and geopolitical purposes; and it’s Okay, in so doing, to destabilize and destroy the lives of multiple thousands of American families after stealing their investments, because the ‘never-Pay’ model – invented by Dr Alan Greenspan and George Bush Sr. – has ‘worked’ so ‘satisfactorily’ and for so long in the past.

• It’s Okay to abuse the Presidency of the United States as a captive platform for the pursuit of internationalist, globalist, World Revolution objectives, with the collaboration of a brainwashed US military class which the whole world can see is much more interested in its pensions, payoffs and
plaudits, than with saving the United States from the clutches of the most evil bunch of organised financial criminals to have walked the face of this earth since the days of Mussolini.

ATTACK ON THE BRITISH MONARCHY VIA SUBVERSION OF THE CHURCH
Turning to related UK domestic affairs, the main story on the front page of the Sunday Telegraph on 15th June 2008 was headed ‘Priests marry in first gay church ‘wedding’. This report states that two male Church of England priests exchanged vows in a traditional wedding ceremony conducted in one of the most glorious Norman churches in Britain: St Bartholomew the Great, deep in the City of London. This filthy, grotesquely blasphemous ‘in-your-face’, reprobate performance represents the latest, orchestrated assault upon both True Christianity and Britain’s structures, since the Church of England and the Monarchy are joined at the hip, The Queen being Head of the Church. (Never mind the historical basis of this: keep it objective here).

By means of such carefully timed, provocations aimed at undermining the faith, the enemy (the human identity of which is known, in case it thought that its anonymity had not been penetrated)
is systematically seeking to destabilise the Monarchy, the sole defender of the Rule of Law, which has collapsed in the United States and is being very severely corroded by the institutionalised
corruption within the European Union Collective and its structures, in parallel.

WHEN THE ENEMY SHALL COME IN LIKE A FLOOD…’
This explains why the enemy, desperate to consolidate what it assumes to be its gains even as it has suffered a succession of brutal kicks in the pants (see below), imagines that it is piling on the pressure. On Friday 13th, the United Nations, that decadent collective which pushes operatives out of 19th floor windows, suddenly suggested that Britain ‘MUST’ [sic] ‘consider whether it should keep the Royal Family’, without even bothering to explain why it had had this conniption.

Specifically, the United Nations’ Human Rights Council pronounced that the British Government should ‘think’ about holding a referendum on this issue, ‘to see if people would prefer to live in a Republican state with a written constitution’. This obscure United Nations council has 29 members, including the well-known liberal democracies of Saudi Arabia, Cuba and Sri Lanka.

The initiative signals to ‘the interested’ (the revolutionary ‘Useful idiots’ and ‘actives’) that it is now time to intensify pressure, by any means available, to remove the one remaining obstacle to the designs of the kakocracy: Her Majesty The Queen, who remains de facto the world’s sole remaining upholder of the Rule of Law.

The underlying rationale for this intensified, multi-faceted offensive against the Monarchy is that The Queen stands in the way of the full realisation of total control by the mental defectives who seek to protect their stolen assets and existence by relentlessly pressing for The New Underworld Order. Any resolution of the Settlements will have been achieved solely as a consequence of the resistance and determination of the British Monarchy, in accordance with the Queen’s appeal to the Group of Seven financial powers in June 2006 to the effect that these matters needed to be resolved ‘for the sake of THE WHOLE OF humanity’.

It will also be recalled that in April 2007, Her Majesty visited The World Court in the Hague, did she not. The Queen did not visit The Hague in order to look at the pictures on the wall.

Judging by the pleasure expressed by Her Majesty and other members of the Royal Family as they watched the impressive fly-past from the balcony of Buckingham Palace on the occasion of the military parade marking her official birthday on 14th June, the transparent intentions of the World Revolutionaries, through their United Nations mouthpiece, have not troubled the equilibrium of the Monarchy, which remains the true backbone of Britain’s strength and its sole defence against the tide of evil swamping our shores from abroad. Britain, after all, is 50% of ‘The Main Enemy’:

‘When the enemy shall come in like a flood, the Spirit of the Lord shall
lift up a standard against him’: Isaiah, Chapter 59, verse 19.

THE AUTHOR OF CONFUSION AND LIES
The devil being the author of lies and confusion, it stands to simple reason (as the Editor often has occasion to remind those who may be downhearted) that everything his disciples touch and handle turns to dust. The truth is always simple: lies are always complex.

Where Satan gains a foothold, lies and delusions become the norm.

For instance, on the front page of The Sunday Telegraph, the Bishop of Winchester, the Right Reverend Michael Scott-Joint, asked, in relation to the aforementioned ‘in-your-face’ abomination at St Bartholomew the Great:

‘Can we stand for clear teaching or are we powerless in the face of these actions?’

What a question for a Bishop to ask! Doesn’t his Right Reverence yet UNDERSTAND that nobody who openly acknowledges and believes that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and is come in the flesh, is powerless in the face of these evils? Does he not YET understand that when you stand up to these representatives of Lucifer, they are so taken aback, that they ‘fall to the ground’?

‘Judas then, having received a band of men and officers from the chief priests and Pharisees, cometh thither with lanterns and torches and weapons’.

‘Jesus, therefore, knowing all things that should come upon him, went forth, and said unto them, Whom seek ye?’

‘They answered him, Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus said unto them, I am he. And Judas also, which betrayed him, stood with them’.

‘As soon then as he had said unto them, I am he, they went backward, and fell to the ground’.
John, Chapter 18, verses 3 to 6.

The Bishop of Winchester commented that ‘this [abomination] clearly flouts Church guidelines’. Note that he invoked ‘CHURCH guidelines’ (the rules that they make up as they go along in their Synod), whereas what he SHOULD have said was that this behavior contravenes the Word of Jesus Christ, who is the Way, the Truth and the Life.

What the Church, consisting of fallen men, says, is NOT what this Bishop should be preaching. He should be preaching the Word of God, not the Word of the worldly Church, which spends its time accommodating evil. But these days, as the enemy comes in like a flood, the Word is what multiple opinionated, self-important and arrogant intelligence operatives like Tony Blair, say it is.

For, just as Bush II has suddenly vouchsafed that he proposes to ‘teach universal values’, so does the tarnished former British Prime Minister now proclaim that he has a mission to propagandise for a Universal Religion. This is a cherished, age-old operation of the enemy, who has as his PRIMARY
objective, the ‘destruction’ of True Christianity, which stands in the way of Man doing ‘as Thou Wilt’ to cite the credo of the pagan Ordo Templi Orientis, to which Bush’s father belongs. In other words, both Tony Blair and George Bush will be doing whatever their handlers on behalf of the struggling World Revolution tell them to do after leaving office: blindly, like the ‘Useful Idiots’ that they are, fulfilling destabilisation tasks allotted to them by the Revolution.

THE ORDEAL OF MEETING THE QUEEN AND GORDON BROWN
Having evidently cut a corrupt secret deal with his co-conspirator President Sarkozy, Mr Bush faced the ordeal of seeing the Queen on Sunday, 15th June, dining with Mr Gordon Brown in the evening, and attending at Number Ten Downing Street on Monday for a formal meeting with Brown ostensibly to discuss the timetable for Britain’s withdrawal of troops from Iraq (the main agenda for the benefit of public consumption) but in reality to provide Brown, as the serving representative of the Bintelligence community and of the Queen, with the necessary documentary confirmations of the Settlements having been concluded, that would enable him to depart from the United Kingdom not in handcuffs and to land in the United States ditto.

For make no mistake: we were at one time advised that if President Bush were to arrive back in the United States without the Settlements having been triggered and well on the way to completion, he would be arrested (or worse). The Editor was first advised of this reality by very reliable sources at 3.50pm on Sunday 15th June 2008, and later this information was given even greater emphasis. We are quite prepared to assume that these undertakings, passed to us, were diversionary.

Since Bush had indeed returned to Washington after leaving Northern Ireland on 16th June, close observers were thereby invited to accept the Settlements as a fait accompli. We ourselves were not immediately inclined to do so, partly in view of a most extraordinary webcam-style broadcast that Bush made sitting on a chair from Northern Ireland, with various indistinct males sitting behind him with their arms folded. In this webcast, apart from suddenly talking about the floods in Iowa, Bush asked Congress not to worry because money would be forthcoming for all the matters that needed to be financed. Exactly WHAT was that all about? Was he signalling that the Settlements were going through, or was he playing Dark Games as usual, to disguise ongoing giga-thefts?

THE DANCE OF THE QUADRILLIONS
Our general scepticism is also associated with the fact that we detect a further signal that the financial criminalist specialists have engineered a way out of their bind, and may emerge from this crisis of their own making as though nothing has happened, having learned no lessons at all, and with the full intention of continuing THEIR corrupt financial ‘business as usual’, as can be observed from the ongoing corrupt behavior of Bank of America, for instance.

The Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC) reports (March 2008) that it cleared more than $1.98 quadrillion in securities transactions in 2007.

The quadrillions of purported US dollars generated via this virtual financial system involving the leverage and hypothecation of stolen assets used as collateral, disguised through securitisation, do not exist in concrete form, or in reality: they exist exclusively in the VIRTUAL electronic sector, and consist of nothing more than ‘bits’ unsupported by underlying documentation, in accordance with the model first described and envisaged by Marshal McLuhan in the United States.

(This illusion is paralleled by the new virtual reality environment spearheaded these days by TV and the Internet, which is being systematically exploited by the ‘Black’ and criminalised elements of the US intelligence community to spread confusion and disinformation in order to blunt perceptions of true reality and the truth).

The only respect in which these quadrillions of dollars exist is when they are translated from the secret untaxed offshore bank accounts into flows of funds that are delivered ‘clean’ into the ‘real’ financial economy, by whatever illicit or dubious means is used for that purpose (which in future will be primarily hedge funds, which were given a dispensation by the Group of Eight (G-8) financial powers during their meeting held in northern Germany in June 2007).

Such ‘virtual’ inflows are fundamentally responsible for the degradation of all fiat currencies, not just the US dollar, and account for the ongoing annual inflation that is these days routinely taken for granted everywhere, excluding consideration of other factors, the falsified escalation of oil prices being a case in point – although this factor, too, is related, since the cartel of energy giants, which is the cartel behind the cartel façade presented by the oil-producing countries, is engaged through its falsification of the world oil price in recouping, on behalf of its corporate membership and the criminalised financial cadres who have been caught ‘in flagrante’, the immense perceived losses and opportunity costs inflicted on them as a consequence of the exposures.

Through its subsidiaries, including European Central Counterparty Limited (EuroCCP), this semi-official US agency provides clearance, settlement and information services for equities, corporate and municipal bonds, government- and mortgage-backed securities, money market instruments and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives. It is now hyping the word ‘quadrillion’ as though such a volume of US dollars exists. It does not. indeed, there is not even anything approaching $1,000 trillion of ‘real’, i.e. cash-cash dollar funds in existence. These ‘quadrillions’ have no documentary back-up whatsoever, representing nothing more than computerised ‘bits’, so that the transactions they purportedly signify cannot be identified, let alone enforced: see the Editor’s outline report on the securitisation of sub-prime mortgages dated 26th December 2006 [Archive].

Yet here is a semi-official US entity boasting that it settled transactions valued at a record $1.8 quadrillion in 2007, thereby enticing its readership to ‘buy’ the illusion that this kind of money exists in reality, which it most certainly does not.

On the contrary, such valuations arise from the legitimate but insidious practice of hypothecation, the leveraging of underlying assets, ESPECIALLY STOLEN AND MULTI-SECURITISED ‘ASSETS’, for illegitimate, private, untaxed gain – and for the purposes of financing and bankrolling the World Revolution through the open-ended BRIBERY of corrupted operatives possessing very serious character flaws who have been specially selected for the purpose and placed in positions from which they can be made to serve the interests of the small claque of ruthless, greedy globalists who are intent upon global hegemony. ‘Implementers’ are selected for their weaknesses.

This lust is fed by greed for money and power: the ancient idolatry of Mammon.

DVD, DACHAU, ANALYSIS RECONFIRMED AS 100% ACCURATE
As the Editor of this service has been able to reveal, it is specifically confirmed now (see also above) that the ‘Black’ power behind this operation is indeed Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD), Dachau, the secret heirs of the former Nazi Abwehr (counterintelligence), which operates independently of the German Government du jour, merely ‘informing’ the German Chancellor of its operations if it chooses to do so. In order to achieve this long-range strategic objective, the DVD penetrated the US intelligence community from the outset, winding up with its chief at its head and subsequently in the White House. (The source of the global evil does not end at Dachau, of course: but ‘sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof’).

Please note that not only has no-one ever contradicted a single facet of this assessment, but its accuracy has been verified to us privately by both British and US intelligence sources. Indeed, on 4th April, a certain US operative who appeared at the Editor’s London office without an appointment
specifically, without any prompting, confirmed that our DVD analysis is quote ‘one hundred percent accurate’. The Editor knew this to be the case, as we hold copies of the relevant Nazi documents proving that ‘Fur uns ist der Krieg niemals vorbei’ (‘For us the war never ended’) and ‘We shall build the Thousand-year Reich on the Ruins of the United States’.

These are the two main Nazi slogans that were promulgated by the German Geopolitical Centre from Madrid after the Second World War, according to pan-German documentation captured and intercepted by the Allies. This intended German strategy to reverse the outcomes of two World Wars, was suppressed by the US State Department and by the seeply penetrated US intelligence community, with the near-disastrous consequences that we observe today.

REPORTS ON BUSH’S VISIT TO THE POPE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS
Friday 13th June 2008 was not a comfortable day for President George W. Bush, although, being schizophrenic, he is equipped with the capacity for presenting a smoothly untroubled outward appearance for public consumption, a feat he pulled off successfully during his European tour. During his visit to Rome, Bush allowed representatives of the Italian, British and American media, to spin off into the stratosphere the notion that Bush is ‘the most Catholic-minded’ President since John F Kennedy (whom his father is supected of having conspired to murder).

Il Foglio, said to be an authoritative newspaper, waffled that Bush might convert to Catholicism, like Blair, following his exit from office (which by the way, George W. Bush has now confirmed will happen: otherwise he wouldn’t be pontificating, would he, about ‘teaching universal values’ after he has left office immensely wealthier than when he stole it): ‘Anything is possible, especially for a born-again Christian such as Bush’.

It is of course news to us that born-again Christians (a tautology: you can’t be a Christian unless you are ‘born again’ spiritually) murders 1.5++ million people, seizes a territory illegally, steals other people’s money as a matter of routine, commits treason daily, orders liquidations, rejoices over executions that he has signed off, and perpetrates financial fraud 24/7 as a matter of course.

The ‘spin’ then vented that Mr Jeb Bush, Governor of Florida, having already converted (to Catholicism, which is not True Christianity) travelled in 2000 to Mexico and prayed to the icon of Our Lady of Guadeloupe. (A former housemaid who was employed in the Jeb Bush household is separately reported to have described the home as spooky, ‘Black’ and overladen with satanic overtones and vibes). For icon, read idol: praying to idols is verboten for both Christians and Jews.

Well, was the visit to the Pope REALLY about Bush converting to Catholicism, do you think? Or was it connected with ongoing ‘backside’ financial arrangements which will, as planned, secure for the Illuminati and their German sponsors another lease of life?

FURTHER PARTICULARS ABOUT SOME EVENTS OF 13TH JUNE 2008
According to one source, US CIA Vice President Cheney attempted a coup d’etat against his own Government. Leaving this exotic interpretation of what happened to one side, we have established that when Cheney became aware that Bush Jr. was engaged in corrupt ‘backside’ deals with the corrupt President of France, he went berserk.

The probable reason for this was that Bush and Sarkozy were about to help themselves to tranches of real (cash-cash) dollar assets stolen by Cheney on his own account and for Bush Sr. and cronies, converted into Euros and now held in sub-accounts with the criminal enterprise Paribas, although obviously the details of what transpired are not known except to the electronic eavesdroppers.

Specifically, the Settlements, which were supposed to have been triggered already, were again interfered with, on the instructions, according to our sources, of Cheney and a key ‘Black Robe’ (allegedly, Roberts). This followed multiple precautions taken by the World Court to preclude further criminalist US sabotage operations.

For instance, on Thursday 12th June, the World Court performed a surprise recheck to make sure that the relevant banks all had their funds in place and ready for payment, as they had also done on 11th June. In the course of this recheck, the World Court’s representatives caught the two criminal
enterprises Citibank and Bank of America both short of funds (i.e., the balances that had been set aside for Settlements had, as usual, been diverted. In response, very swift action was taken, with punitive action threatened, whereupon the funds suddenly reappeared.

(Further stealing took place later, as identified higher up in this report).

Citibank’s criminalist operations are still presided over by Robert Rubin, Clinton’s former Treasury Secretary, who is in turn watched by Sir Win Bischoff, who isbelieved to be the eyes and ears of The Queen at Citibank, New York, and the guardian, therefore, of the $6.2 trillion loan funds which, if ‘pulled’, would collapse Citibank and induce a global financial and economic implosion.

On 13th June, President Bush, facing having to appear in Britain before The Queen and Gordon Brown, knowing that visiting Britain without the Settlements having been finalised would be, shall we say, hazardous, screamed at Cheney over the not-so-secure line – because, as we were told by special sources, if Cheney (and the Chief Justice, Roberts) continued to block the Settlements, he, Bush, would be arrested on arrival back in the United States.

As indicated above, we have been reliably advised that this assessment was accurate at the time: provisions were indeed in place for the arrest of Bush should he arrive back in the United States with the Settlements still up in the air. Since we know this to be true, we necessarily question the prevailing obfuscation surrounding the Settlements, with all that it implies.

A severe power outage engulfed Washington, DC. on Friday 13th June, behind cover of which one source has asserted that Cheney informed President Bush that the United States Government’s communications were under his sole control and Bush would have to comply with his (Cheney’s) instructions. Our sources informed us that during the blackout period, two of Cheney’s operatives, who were said to have been engaged in operations to block the Settlements, were shot dead at point-blank range [see above]. The circumstances surrounding the sudden death at 1.20pm on 13th June of the greatly liked broadcaster Tim Russert, have also been called into question. as noted.

Considering that, according to the VIRTUAL reality presentation (e.g., Yahoo! News, 17th June 2008), President Bush and Laura ‘rode in a short, unmarked motorcade to St Albans’ School in Northwest Washington’ where a wake was being held in the refectory for Tim Russert – i.e., the Godfather appeared at the funeral – we are not alone in placing the worst construction on this matter, to which the following can be added here:

• Russert, whose wife is Italian, had just returned from Rome, coinciding with Bush’s visit to the German Pope and Berlusconi, two of ‘the most interested’ parties to the Settlements.

• Russert is reported also to have just completed an interview with Barrack Obama. A US source informs us that when Obama was questioned about Russert’s death, he failed to display the usual requisite concern about any sudden death, with appropriate expressions of grief, but appeared to be somewhat indifferent to this development, or at any rate cautious in his comments.

• It is also reported that Russert had been digging into certain financial fraud issues, thought to have been directly related to those discussed in these reports.

• Russert was known to be highly suspicious of and antagonistic towards Vice President Cheney, whom he rightly suspected of being de facto a mafia boss. He had also performed as the leading witness in the trial which resulted in the conviction of the Vice President’s former Chief of Staff, Lewis ‘Scoooter’ Libby, one of whose legal clients had been Marc Rich, a.k.a. Hans Brand, the long-range DVD operative who emigrated from Germany in 1954, winding up initially in Saskatoon. Given this background, Tim Russert would certainly have been highly vulnerable to the wrath of these maddened snakes, had he been digging into these issues, as we believe to be the case.

Did he ask the wrong questions, triggering his assassination before he could break his discoveries in prime time?

• The Editor received emails from several American women who expressed deep concern about the sudden death of Tim Russert. Since certain women are especially gifted with intuition, the Editor always takes such communications seriously. For these several women to email us almost simultaneously with the same qualms struck, the Editor as significant and relevant here.

A further curious feature of this sudden death was the coordinated lamentation that took over the main US broadcast media, followed by the wall-to-wall TV coverage of the wake etc.. While it is well understood that the one thing that all these controlled media outlets cannot handle is any lurking suspicion that one of their own has been ‘whacked’, it was very odd that the lamentations erupted – assuming wall-to-wall proportions for a while, as though this was itself meant to be diversionary.

For while the broadcast media were engaged in this collective act of mourning, information about any attempted putsch was of course blotted from the record.

In other words, the broadcast media had a sudden issue that kept them fully preoccupied, while an official, dense veil was drawn over the Cheney episode and the further shootings associated with this horrendous Luciferian financial power struggle.

Given that one of Cheney’s doubles was shot dead at the turn of the year, one may speculate as to whether another Cheney double succumbed (on Friday 13th June 2008) in the course of this latest manifestation of the violence that has been erupting now since at least the spring of 2007.

However given that Cheney is protected these days by armed Blackwater thugs, we think this is unlikely. A further consideration of exceptional importance is that, now that at least four of the Unterreichsführer’s closest associates and/or operatives have been liquidated in the space of less than a week (according to what we have been reliably advised), the likelihood of others assisting him to implement his serial financial thefts and diversion operations has been called into question, not that a man as evil as Cheney can possibly have any ‘friends’.

Who would want to be murdered in his bed by having his throat cut for a snake as venomous as Cheney, who would be programmed to double-cross any associate later?

THE CONTINUING IMPORTANCE OF THE ARMED SEIZURES IN LONDON
Although a mass of detailed information about the complex manoeuvring behind the scenes, as these snakes bite each other during the final phase of Act One of this unprecedented crisis has been forthcoming throughout May and June, the factor of greatest importance in pushing these matters forward has remained the seizure by 300 armed British police on Monday 2nd June of the lock boxes and vaults at the three locations operated by Safe Deposit Centres Limited in Mayfair, Hampstead and Edgware, London.

A trickle of information has subsequently been released by the Metropolitan Police in order to satisfy public and press curiosity, without any intelligence surfacing from that quarter concerning what the raids were really all about. The ‘line’ has been that the raids recovered stolen property, with some details of that property being released for public consumption. But the sheer scale, by British standards, of the operation precludes any possibility that the ‘public consumption line’ is related in any way to the underlying purpose of this development.

On 14th June, British media sources, using the same language, reported that more than £53 million had been found during searches at the safe deposit centres and that ‘police have been working round the clock since the initial raids by 300 officers at London addresses thought to be linked to crimes ranging from money laundering to paedophilia and have now completed their searches’.

It has transpired that a total of 6,717 boxes had been opened by 14th June and searched, and that 3,608 of the boxes contained items inside. The contents of the lock boxes, and the boxes and the vaults themselves, were transported, in the course of a ten-day operation, to a secure, intensely
guarded location, for investigation.

Police found cash, handguns accompanied by a large amount of ammunition, fraudulent passports,, credit cards and cheque books, drugs including cannabis, crack cocaine and opiates, works of art, child abuse images, and large quantities of jewellery. On 9th June, six suitcases containing what was believed to be gold dust, were found. Such gold dust would clearly represent the residue of meltdown operations, and can be reconstituted back into gold bars. This raises the question: what was the source of this clearly stolen gold? British police now estimate that there are likely to be around 1,800 separate investigations as a consequence of these raids.

It is also now known that Leslie Sieff, a Director of the safety lock box firm, aged 60, was arrested in Finchley Road, Hampstead, and that Jacqueline Swan, aged 44, was arrested in Park Street, Marble Arch, on 2nd June. The third person, mentioned in our original report, Milton Woolf, aged 52, was arrested at Heathrow Airport. All three were then bailed to return to a London police station in early September. The police say that the raids followed two years of work which linked the three lock box locations to organised criminal operations including paedophilia, firearms, drug trafficking, fraud, trafficking in human beings, prostitution, and money laundering.

All these activities are specialities of elements of the criminalist intelligence and underworld cadres and revolutionary ‘actives’ exposed generically in these reports.

But our own sources say that this is far from the full picture. Key observers occupying sensitive positions say that long-pledged assets belonging to the Government of the United States, plus Federal Reserve Notes, Federal Reserve Bonds and Wells Fargo Bonds that were stolen from the
Chinese in the course of a sting operation, are included, as are deed boxes and ‘Box Gang’ assets, plus assets connected to Wanta’s operations, have been identified in the course of this massive British police operation.

All sources consulted, including Chinese sources, were in agreement that the seizure of the lock boxes and vaults represented a crucial move by the British authorities, carefully timed to induce the appropriate responses from the criminalist cadres at this time.

Original assets, including stolen assets, used as collateral for leveraging operations, plus tear sheets and other original documents, are thought to have been found. No doubt those parties who ‘needed to know’ about this development were made aware of what had occurred, so that
they could consider adjusting their behavior accordingly.

THE IRISH PUT THE BOOT IN TO THE PAN-GERMAN SUBVERSION OPERATION
On Friday 13th June, too, it became known that, as expected, the Irish electorate had refused to be bullied by the gauleiters who were brazenly instructing them how to vote, and threatening them with nasty consequences, including having to ‘pay’ for a ‘wrong decision’, if they were indeed to
vote contrary to the wishes of the self-appointed globalist coercion elite who know what is best for them (meaning for themselves, of course).

The offensive had been kicked off by the little fellow from Portugal, Jose Manuel Barroso, who is currently President of the European Commission, to which the satrap EU ‘Member States’ have, thanks to the fact that their representatives have been bribed/blackmailed along the way, as we have revealed, delegated ‘general powers’.

This is the same model as that adopted by Adolf Hitler in 1933. At first, Hitler procured that the Communists were absent from a crucial session of the Reichstag. In their absence, his lackeys transferred ‘general powers’ to Hitler’s Cabinet, which Hitler then proceeded to steal from the Cabinet itself. For an excellent explanation of this procedure, see ‘Hitler’s Thirty Days to Power: January 1933, by Henry Ashby Turner, Jr., Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA, and New York, 1996, ISBN 0-201-40714-0.

It is no surprise that the same model has been applied in the EU context, given that the European Union Collective represents the realisation of the blueprint first outlined by the Nazis themselves in their policy/seminar compendium ‘Europaische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft’ (meaning ‘European Economic Community’) published in Berlin in 1942 [by Haude & Spenersche Verlagsbuchhandlung Max Paschke], the chapter headings of which correspond almost precisely to those of the 1992 EU Maastricht Treaty. We pointed this out as early as 1993, but people suffered from EGO (Eyes Glaze Over) then, and have STILL largely failed to make this simple connection today.

This is the kind of definitive evidence that buttresses our finding that the evils of the world are attributable to a great extent to the hitherto unrestrained operations of the secret long-range deception operations directed by Deustche Verteidigungs Dienst, Dachau, an assessment from which NOBODY has dared to dissent since we first began exposing this monumental subversion operation against ‘the Main Enemy’ several years ago, and which has been specifically confirmed by authoritative sources, as indicated.

The current wave of EU gauleiters uses the same sordid techniques as all its predecessors have used: bribery (from secret slush funds), fraudulent finance operations (leveraging the notorious institutionalised corruption of the EU structures), rewarding cronies with contracts placed with controlled corporations with secret bank accounts set up in tax havens, and crude threats.

In the run-up to the Irish referendum, Barroso pronounced that ‘if there was a ‘No’ in Ireland or in another country’ (but he meant Ireland), ‘it would have a very negative effect for the EU. We will all pay a price for it, Ireland included, if this is not done in a proper way’.

After Ireland’s Prime Minister, Brian Cowen, had committed the faux-pas of admitting that anyone who read the entire convoluted Lisbon Treaty would be ‘insane’, he then tried to make amends with unconvincing bromides such as that ‘fellow Europeans will simply not understand why a nation that has benefited most could not pass this treaty’.

With more of the same bullying coming from the former European Commissioner and globalist Peter Sutherland, and aware that the Irish financial economy now faces truly intractable problems without perhaps understanding why (see our report dated 10th June 2008), the Irish took the wise decision to refuse to go along with validating a document that their new Prime Minister couldn’t be bothered to read, concluding indeed that if it wasn’t worth reading, it wasn’t worth voting for, either.

EUROPEAN LEADERS SHOW THEIR TRUE UNDEMOCRATIC COLOURS
But no sooner had the Irish ‘No’ vote been confirmed, than the French, the Germans and, most disgracefully, the British Prime Minister, Mr Gordon Brown, insisted that the national ratification procedures should continue, even though the Czech Government, which sees through this pan-German ploy, has stated that the Lisbon treaty is dead and buried.

Since Mr Brown REFUSED to inform the Editor of this service, via his staff, whether or not he had read the Lisbon Treaty, we may assume that, like Brian Cowen, he couldn’t be bothered to do so either, and that, like his Irish counterpart, he is cynically inflicting a straightjacket treaty on the
British people contrary to their known wishes, and despite his own refusal to acknowledge either that he has read the Treaty (in which case he is a traitor) or else that he has not read the Treaty (in which case he is guilty of negligence and is in gross dereliction of his responsibilities, as well as being a traitor, like all his predecessors since the long-term German Abwehr agent, Edward Heath, lied to the British people in 1972 concerning the true purpose of the intended political collective [see Archive report dated 12th October 2005]. In other words, intelligence officer Brown is a fraud.

GORDON BROWN’S ‘LEGEND’ CALLED INTO QUESTION
In this context, the Editor was most interested to observe, on page W2 of the Weekend section of The Daily Telegraph of Saturday, 14th June 2008, in a feature celebrating ‘Father’s Day’, which the British have never previously bothered with, a segment about Gordon Brown and his father. This showed a photograph of Mr Brown’s alleged father John standing in front of an old-style car in a traditional farmyard, with two small boys. The caption reads: ‘Moral compass: Gordon Brown (above left) at the age of two, with his father John and elder brother, John Junior’.

The images of the two little boys had clearly been cut out and then stuck onto the old background photograph. When such montages were made (using old technology), the lighting was liable to cast a dark shadow at some edges of the images stuck onto the background, given that the light casts a shadow round the raised edges in question.

This was clearly a doctored montage, as can be seen from the hard black edge around the left-hand side of the older boy’s face, his right thigh and his left shoulder, and the parallel hard (black) edge around the right ear of ‘Gordon’ and along his left shoulder and arm. This new discovery confirms the Editor’s long-held suspicion that the received ‘legend’ associated with the intelligence officer Gordon Brown may be ‘misleading’.

There are also similar indications that the father figure in this picture may likewise have been mounted onto this rural background image. If these observations are anywhere close to being accurate, there is no difference between Britain these days and the ‘former’ Soviet Union, which was adept at falsifying photographs in order to sustain false ‘legends’ or to reflect liquidations of key personnel. Furthermore, it may be usefully noted that Gordon Brown’s age corresponds to the timeframe of the Hungarian uprising in 1956.

WHY DID BROWN FLY TO NORTHERN IRELAND HAVING SAID GOODBYE TO THE BUSHES?
We will now pose the following question. WHY was it ‘necessary’ for Brown, who had seen George Bush in the morning of Monday 16th June, to rush up to Northern Ireland so as to be in a position to be standing on the tarmac at Belfast airport, to ‘greet’ the President and Laura when they arrived in Northern Ireland? After all, he had just said goodbye to President Bush. Perish the thought that the purpose of his presence there might have been to open bank accounts. Perish the thought.

BRITAIN AND AMERICA ADOPT THE REVOLUTIONARY METHODOLOGY OF DECEPTION
The same thing is happening in the United States. Prominent figures known to have been either poisoned or shot dead are routinely reported to be functioning normally, despite reports and distance forensic evidence to the contrary.

When lies and confusion are the norm in government, this kind of perverted behavior becomes commonplace. What we are observing here reflects the little understood fact that, after 72 years (the Rule of 72) of fronting for the World Revolution, the classic revolutionary state, the United States, removed the revolutionary baton from the USSR and assumed its former function as the world’s leading revolutionary power.

This accounts for its abominable behavior ever since. It also accounts for the confusion which bedevils the antics of the drifting British Government, which, under the former corrupt leadership of Tony Blair, with whom his Buddy Bush was scheduled to have breakfast on Monday 16th March, led the country into one illicit war and into the separate maelstrom of Afghanisatan, where the
‘task’ of ‘defeating the Taliban is code for maximising the heroin poppy crop. Indeed, large swathes of the Afghan population are today reported to be near starvation because, under the malevolent influence of the British, American and NATO invaders, arable land previously used for growing food crops has been turned over en masse to poppies.

The architect of this diabolical deception is one of the most odious snakes in the long grass that has to be cleared: Richard Armitage. It is no surprise that three very senior British army officers, honourable men, have abruptly resigned of late from the military, always citing reasons other than the real one: which is that they are disgusted at the amorality and deceit of the British authorities in supporting this Luciferian operation to maximise the heroin drug yield.

One would not be at all surprised to discover that the UK Ministry of Defence has established internal arrangements modelled after the Halliburton precedent deep inside the bowels of The Pentagon, to maximize the potential for war profiteering.

In parallel with all this, Mr Michael Chertoff, head of the US Department of Homeland Security, is reported to have withdrawn personnel from the porous Mexican border, beyond which it is now widely known that the military are fully operational in protecting and assisting organised criminal drug traffickers originally programmed by the CIA, for a cut of the action.

Thus, while the finances of the criminalist cadres have to some extent been destabilised due to the exposures, the enemy continues to come in as a flood. Indeed, as might be expected, it is busily redoubling its efforts, given the successive kicks in the pants that it has recently received.

LIES FED TO US ABOUT THE WORLD COURT
Finally, earlier in June, we were contacted by a UK intelligence party who proceeded along an old tack of asserting that the World Court/ICJ lacks appropriate powers in the United States, in this context. Unfortunately for the UK disinformation people, the Editor has massive written evidence from key Trustees concerning their dealings, and those of their most trusted associates in Europe (directors of their corporations etc) that reference the direct and continuing presence and positive
activity of the World Court/ICJ in promoting the resolution of these matters.

Not only did Her Majesty The Queen visit the World Court in 2007, to convey what needed to be conveyed, but the US Supreme Court was forced to concede the jurisdiction of the World Court in this Settlements crisis earlier this year. So why we were being told, as late as June 2008, that the World Court had nothing to do with it, remains unclear.

We can prove with documents that this is not the case. DROP IT, FOLKS.

Indeed, to revert to the Editor with this disinformation ploy at this late stage suggests that certain UK cadres have lost touch with reality. On 9th June, Interpol, British intelligence operatives and agents working for the Group of Seven financial powers (excluding the pariah United States) were
all reported to be engaged in operations to procure the necessary outcome. Personnel liable to continue blocking progress were told to ‘get out of the way’. As can be seen from the tenor of this report, we do not know the outcome.

Furthermore, the ‘immunities’ apparently conceded by the World Court for some of the primary high-level perpetrators of these endless financial thefts and crimes, lapsed with effect from 2nd June. There appear to have been extensions, certainly for President Bush (see above) thereafter.

The list of perpetrators, co-conspirators and top fraudsters for which arrest warrants had long since been issued and which were therefore now reactivated, runs to five pages and consists of 142 names. We do not have a copy of this list (yet) but we do know that the names on it include:

• Bernanke
• Black Robes (two)
• Blair
• Bush Jr.
• Bush Sr.
• Cheney
• Chertoff
• Clinton (former President, 43)
• Congress (12 Members)
• Greenspan
•’Heart attack Bob’ (because he always feigned a heart attack whenever activated to fulfil his payment obligations)
• Roberts
• Rubin
• Sarkozy.

When Mr Bush screamed at Cheney over the transatlantic telephone connection on 13th June that if the Settlements were frustrated any longer, he would be arrested on arrival back in the United States, he knew what he was talking about.

For this astonishing fact to have surfaced into the public domain indicates the extreme degree of dangerous disorientation that characterises the last days of Herr Busche, whose Presidency has been disgraced by his corruption and treason. Whether, despite his further deceit, the World Court granted him yet another extension of his ‘immunity’ from arrest when his lawyers appeared before the Court on 16th June, remains, like so much else associated with this crisis, unknown at this time.

• The information in this report is believed to be accurate to the best of our knowledge and belief at the time of posting.

METHODOLOGY OF AND NOTES ON THESE REPORTS
George H. W. Bush Sr. controls, or until very recently controlled, Black elements of the Central Intelligence Agency just as he used to do when he was Director of Central Intelligence (DCI), Vice President and then President of the United States, while all the while representing the long-range pan-German secret Nazi Abwehr ‘Black’ counterintelligence strategists, now known as Deutsche Vertiedigungs Dienst, based in the notorious German town of Dachau.

Note that since we first exposed this penetration three years ago, these facts have never been refuted. On the contrary, not only have they been specifically corroborated by a US operative who did a ‘walk-in’ to our London office at 5.50pm on 4th April 2008, but certain British operatives have been cynically congratulated on this exposure – as though the Editor works for British intelligence, which is so far from the case it doesn’t merit further mention. In 2004, MI6 even tried to discredit the Editor by informing the controlled ‘mainstream’ media that he was involved (a) with a character called Bernie Ecclestone in Monaco and (b) that he was involved with Mark Thatcher in connection with the botched coup against Equatorial Guinea, which is currently making headlines again.

These lies were promulgated by the veteran UK journalist and Mossad biographer Gordon Thomas, when the Editor visited him in Bath in November 2004. After the Editor informed Mr Gordon Thomas that these allegations were crass, as he had been engaged in writing and publishing non-stop since 1970 and during this time had had no time to do anything else, Gordon Thomas retorted:

‘It doesn’t have to be true. It just has to be out there’.

Outraged, the Editor published an article entitled ‘The intelligence community’s attempts to ‘set the Editor up’’ in International Currency Review, Volume 30, Numbers 2 & 3 [January 2005: pages 27-39]. This article detailed the crude lies and idiocies retailed by Gordon Thomas on behalf of MI6 (by his own admission), after which nothing more was heard of these lies.

When the Editor asked the purpsoe of these lies, Gordon Thomas said; ‘To make you sit up’. The Editor thereupon informed Thomas that it was his intention to conduct detailed research into the financial corruption and the Wanta dimension, the implication being that we would expose it. The Editor took this quite extraordinary episode to represent an attempt by MI6 to discourage him from embarking upon these investigations.

This detail is added here because of yet another US attempt to smear the Editor, since we last reported, as an intelligence operative. We append a routine statement at the foot of these reports indicating what will happen to anyone who repeats such lies. We take this opportunity to add that if the perpetrator of such lies hides behind anonymity, we will seek libel damages in the English Court against the website platform through which any such lies are disseminated internationally.

Concerning the content of these reports, we assemble information from sources believed to be reliable, knowing that some or all of them may be or are ‘connected’, that some have axes to grind, and that we are constantly liable to be deceived. The skill lies in seeing how developments hang together, testing the analyses for faults, and presenting our conclusions in context.

It is also necessary to add that we speculate on the basis of our best interpretation of the facts teased out from the maelstrom of deliberate lies and disinformation, but that given the Luciferian behaviour of the ‘Black Forces’ we are reporting on, and the importance that they attach to virtual information which enables them to present lies as fact and vice versa, we can never do more than use our best endeavours to expose the truth. US lawyers use the unpleasant phrase ‘to the best of our knowledge and belief’, which covers them if they turn out to be mistaken. Some facts are very clearly seen to be accurate when first encountered, as they could not possibly have been invented.

More to the point, one has to bear in mind at all times that OBFUSCATION is a primary objective of these criminal operatives. If the subject can be changed, they’ll change the subject. Diversionary ploys are mobilised at every turn. This has gone on for so long now, that the US criminalists have become far more sophisticated than Dr Josef Goebbels ever was, with their lies and deceptions, raising the skill of pulling the wool over everyone’s eyes to the level of a new art form. We need not be despondent at this, since it remains the case that what they cannot handle is STRAIGHT EXPOSURE: that’s manifestly what Cheney feared from the late Tim Russert.

The whole point of these reports is that they have nothing to do with any organisation, intelligence or otherwise. That represents a problem for the compartmentalised criminalised entities, especially the Central Intelligence Agency, which never expected to have to put up with any opposition, given its control of the Fourth and much of the Fifth (Internet) Estate as well.

One consequence of this state of affairs is that we have become quite skilled in detecting when information passed to us is especially sensitive, by the fact that the brain-dead eavesdroppers have a habit of cutting us off from the other party if they don’t like what we are being told. This practice, which is routine, shows how bad at their job the eavesdroppers appear to be.

ANNEXE:

REITERATION OF THE STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, THEIR ASSOCIATES AND RELEVANT BANKSTERS ARE IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• ‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON IS IN BREACH AND OF WHICH THE SIX ‘LEVY BANKS’ MAY LIKEWISE BE VARIOUSLY IN BREACH [CREDIT SUISSE, UBS, DEUTSCHE BANK, BANK OF AMERICA, CITIBANK, THE BANK OF ENGLAND]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is/was in violation of:
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND BANKSTERS [see previous reports]:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.