RETROSPECTIVE ATTEMPT TO VARY A COURT STATEMENT

cropped-chrisstory

PERJURY IMPLICATIONS OF OPERATION TO RE-WRITE WANTA’S LEGEND

Thursday 25 February 2010 15:14

(1): THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CONSIDERED AT THE ALEXANDRIA COURT
HEARING ON 19TH OCTOBER 2007: POSTED HERE ON 24TH JUNE 2007 WHEN FILED(2): MOTION TO DISMISS OF RESPONDENT: FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND:

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

• See also: Legal moves to sue those blocking the Settlements: 7th February report [Archive].

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION
The Editor has received a large volume of emails from all over the world enquiring why there has been no report since 12th February, whether the Editor is well, whether he has been ‘got at’ or liquidated, whether he has been prevented from reporting, and many other solicitous and kind observations. Thank you all for your concern for the Editor’s welfare, which is VERY genuinely appreciated (and completely undeserved!)

There are three main reasons why we didn’t report for a while after 12th February:

• First, we have the practical matter and obligation to publish our journals, and we were heavily engaged in passing a very large issue of International Currency Review [Volume 35, Numbers 1 & 2], for press. When one is passing page proofs for press, nothing else can be allowed to get in the way, or mistakes are made which can be disastrous. Moreover the forthcoming huge issue is of exceptional importance as it will provide, as the preceding issues have done, a permanent record of the recent stages of the financial corruption crisis, and of the reprobate intransigence of the highest-level perpetrators, which therefore cannot ever be expunged.

That is the whole point. They cannot rewrite history because our printed reports on the financial corruption are and will continue to be lodged in libraries, institutions, agencies, corporations, and elsewhere all over the world. And there is NOTHING THEY CAN DO ABOUT IT.

In addition, we have been completing a large issue of Economic Intelligence Review, which contains inter alia, an extensive analysis demonstrating conclusively that SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. LAW. A summary of this analysis will be posted prior to publication.

• Secondly, following the report dated 12th February, the lid blew off the cauldron. Since the purpose of these reports is first and foremost to help to procure compliance and fulfilment with financial obligations (rather than specifically to provide an information service), there are times when it is more helpful to remain silent. This was the case after the lid blew off the cauldron.

We couldn’t cause another lid to blow off because the lid had already blown off, if you understand the point here. One doesn’t publish for the sake of it: one publishes so as to produce results, and to expose iniquity. There remains plenty of iniquity to expose, so our service on that score will be resumed at the appropriate time soon. It hasn’t been appropriate to elaborate any further YET on the content of the report dated 12th February, as we have been waiting for ‘consequences’.

• Thirdly, there is an operation to VARY COURT-DEPOSED FACT, and to substitute FABRICATION for the same. We wanted also to see quite how far this desperate rearguard CIA operation to snub the Court would be pushed. The answer appears to be: as far as possible.

Therefore, this report deals with this specific issue, on which we will NOT need to elaborate. We won’t be able to place this in context, if you don’t know the context.

Without going into further details, the attempt to vary the Court record is associated with:

• An arrogant assumption that the content of the Court-deposed Petition has been ‘forgotten’.

• An apparent attempt to provide a basis for the diversion of funds (which cannot succeed).

PURPORTED VARIATION OF COURT DEPOSITION
An Internet operation has been mounted by US operatives and disinformation hacks recently which appears to seek to VARY the substance of the Petition/deposition made by Mr Leo/Lee Wanta for consideration by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Alexandria.

This Petition was the subject of a hearing in the Alexandria Court dated 19th October 2007, attended inter alia by the Editor of this service.

Detail published in the Internet reports referenced above contains fabrications and diverges from the substance of the Petition presented for consideration by the Court. Any legend which deviates from the language and meaning of the Petition could be viewed as representing a felony against the Court as it would be implied that petitioner lied on the stand.

Petitioner informed the Court [see below] that he had been fully advised by counsel of the seriousness of the claim of making false statements to a Court and was fully apprised of the consequences for committing perjury (and the associated penalties).

It has of course not escaped our notice that Wanta is not engaged in this operation on his own. Others, with greater presentational ‘skills’, are perpetrating this sterile rearguard CIA fabrication operation. In addition to the evident intent to VARY the substance of information provided before the Court, there may also be an integrated intent to enmesh Mr Wanta himself in perjury: in which case, this operation may also represent a set-up against Wanta (par for the course).

Wanta has been distributing the link to a new ‘slick’ website containing the fabricated variations, under colour of his fraudulent Principality of Snake Hill non-status, using a 202 ‘Telefon’ number provided by the French Embassy in Washington.

We have long since proved, with the imprimatur of the Australian Embassy, Dublin, that there is no Principality of Snake Hill – as reiterated in our reports dated 20th September 2009, 22nd October 2009, 17th November 2009, and 12th February 2010, for example.

However the perpetrators appear not only to believe, consistently with their known contempt for the Rule of Law, that it is permissible to VARY what has been stated in Court, but further to ignore PROVEN FACT as though the email from Ms. Brenda Farrell, of the Australian Embassy, Dublin, had never happened. Wanta’s self-designated Ambassadorship (of the Principality of Snake Hill to the United States), the Snake Hill Central Bank and the Snake Hill Trade Commission, are all proven, defunct fabrications: like the content of the Internet reports seeking to VARY the substance of the following Petition to the Court:

(1): THE ALEXANDRIA COURT HEARING ON 19TH OCTOBER 2007
On the above-mentioned date, the Petition reproduced below was considered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, under District Judge T. S. Ellis III.

Present throughout the day in the back of the Courtroom were the following:

Colonel Dana Wilcox
Mr Michael C. Cottrell B.A., M.S.
Mr Christopher E. H. Story FRSA

Mr Leo/Lee Wanta was called to the witness stand.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Case Number: 1:2007cv00609 – TSE – BRP

Filed: 20th June 2007

Petitioner: Lee E. Wanta

Respondents: Henry M. Paulson, Jr., Robert M. Kimmitt, James R. Wilkinson, Michael Chertoff, Alberto R. Gonzales and Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

Court: Virginia Eastern District Court

Office: Alexandria Office

County: Richmond

Presiding Judge: District Judge T. S. Ellis III

Referring Judge: Magistrate Judge Barry R. Poretz

Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges

Cause: 28: 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant

Jury demanded by: None

Note: This case cannot be sealed until Ambassador Leo E. Wanta has been paid the $4.5 trillion of his Settlement diverted and exploited illegally since June 2006.

The Court has, most unusually, given the Respondents TWO MONTHS to respond.

SIR LEO WANTA’S PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS (1)
The text of the Ambassador’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus follows:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Civil Action no.: 1-07 CV 609

LEE E. WANTA, LEO E. WANTA, AMBASSADOR LEO WANTA (Individually and as sole and exclusive shareholder of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., a Commonwealth of Virginia registered corporation)

Petitioner

v.

HENRY M. PAULSON, JR.
SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY
UNITED STATES TREASURY, and

ROBERT M. KIMMITT
DEPUTY SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY
UNITED STATES TREASURY, and

JAMES R. WILKINSON
CHIEF OF STAFF
UNITED STATES TREASURY, and

MICHAEL CHERTOFF
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, and

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND
DIRECTOR AND/OR MANAGER OF OPERATIONS,
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA

Respondents

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
AND OTHER EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF

A. PARTIES:

1. LEE E. WANTA, LEO E. WANTA, AMBASSADOR LEO WANTA
5516 Falmouth Street
Suite 108
Richmond, Virginia 23230: Petitioner

2. Henry M. Paulson, Jr.
Secretary of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20220: Respondent

3. Robert M. Kimmitt
Deputy Secretary of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20220: Respondent

4. James R. Wilkinson
Chief of Staff
United States Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20220: Respondent

5. Michael Chertoff
Secretary of Homeland Security
Washington, D.C.: respondent

6. Alberto R. Gonzales
Attorney General
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20530-0001: Respondent

7. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
701 East Byrd Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219: Respondent

B. JURISDICTION:

1. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this cause of action pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 85, Section 1361 (mandamus), Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 85, Section 1331, and Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 85, Section 1332.

C. VENUE:

2. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 87, Section 1391, and Title 28 United States Code Chapter 87, Section 1396.

D. STATEMENT OF CLAIM:

3. Mandamus is regarded as an extraordinary writ reserved for special situations. Among its ordinary preconditions are that the agency or official have acted (or failed to act) in disregard of a clear legal duty and that there be no adequate conventional means for review. In re Bluewater Network & Ocean Advocates, 234 F.3d 1305, 1315 (D.C. Cir. 2000); Telecomm. Research & Action Ctr. v. FCC, 750 F.2d 70, 78 (D.C. Cir. 1984).

Mandamus will be granted if the Petitioner shows “(1) the presence of novel and significant questions of law; (2) the inadequacy of other available remedies; and (3) the presence of a legal issue whose resolution will aid in the administration of justice”, see In re United States, 10 F.3d 229 at 931, 933 (2d Cir. 1993).

4. Petitioner has attempted to access monies that were transferred through international bank monetary clearing systems to financial institutions located in the United States of America. The remitting party was the People’s Republic of China, People’s Bank. The remitting party designated that the transferred funds were for the sole and exclusive use and benefit of Petitioner. The foreign entity that originated the inward remittance designated Petitioner as sole and exclusive recipient for the transferred money/financial instruments.

Irrespective of efforts proffered by Petitioner and/or agents and representatives of Petitioner, private and public individuals and entities, prevent Petitioner from exercising Petitioner’s legal right to the use, transfer and unrestricted ability to freely disburse said financial assets. The acts and/or omissions to act by named and unnamed Respondents prevent Petitioner (and others who are ancillary to this cause of action) from paying their respective tax liabilities to both State and Federal taxing authorities.

5. Upon best information and belief the organizations, entities, departments and individuals that prevent and/or restrict Petitioner’s lawful access to said money and securities include but are not necessarily limited to the following:

• Secretary of the Treasury;
• Attorney General of the United States of America;
• Bank of America;
• J.P. Morgan Chase;
• CITIBANK/CITIGROUP/NYC including but not limited to Mr Charles O. Prince, CITIGROUP Chief Executive Officer;
• Goldman Sachs et al including but not limited to past and present management and executive officers and members of the Board of Directors;
• United States Department of the Treasury including but not limited to Secretary
Paulson, Deputy Secretary Kimmitt and other known and/or unknown parties working
directly or under contract with the United States Department of the Treasury;
• Secretary Chertoff, Department of Homeland Security and other known and/or
unknown parties working directly or under contract with the United States
Department of Homeland Security;
• One or more known and/or unknown “compliance officers” that act directly and/or
under contract with private bank and/or security brokerage firms to observe
rules and regulations of the United States Department of the Treasury and/or other
USG investigative and reporting entities;
• Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Virginia.

6. Upon best information and belief Respondent acts and/or failures to act constitute a
violation of the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934 (as amended in 1970), the Bank
Privacy Act and other non-specified banking regulations.

7. Reasonable action has been taken by Petitioner to obtain an explanation and/or under what authority Respondents are not permitting Petitioner to have access to the foreign transferred private business financial assets referenced herein. Despite written notice and request for a response the named parties avoid their legal obligations. In furtherance of this Petition for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus Petitioner directs this Court’s attention to the letters and other communications that have been collectively marked as Exhibits A attached hereto (2) and all of which documents, letters and Memorandum are incorporated herein by this reference as if the same were set out in their entirety in the body of this Petition.

8. The material, substantive and immediate financial loss to the Petitioner resulting from loss of financial benefit can not adequately be addressed in conventional judicial proceedings.

In one or more instances parties in position of knowledge, that can confirm the representations regarding interference in private business dealings, between Petitioner and third parties, have been placed at risk of physical harm by individuals representing to be fiduciaries of one or more of the Respondents. Additionally, the acts and actions of the Respondents prevent immediate payment of Federal taxes in the amount of $1.575 Trillion dollars into the United States Treasury.

E. BACKGROUND:

9. On or about April 15, 2003 the Honorable Gerald Bruce Lee, in Case Number 02-1363-A filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, issued an Order and Memorandum of Opinion for the referenced numbered case. As part of the Order and Memorandum of the Court (in the referenced case) the Court stated that the Plaintiff (in the referenced case) should pursue liquidation of corporations, recovery of financial assets and pay all required taxes in accordance with the law (3).

10. Petitioner initiated contact with numerous third parties, including United States elected, nominated, appointed and career employees plus foreign countries, for the purpose of recovering financial assets.

11. Upon best information and belief in December 2005 and January 2006, Secretary Snow (Secretary of the Treasury at the time) and Chairman Greenspan (Chairman of the Federal Reserve at the time) traveled to the People’s Republic of China.

The Chinese required confirmation of Petitioner’s signature to facilitate cooperation of the Chinese in completing the transfer of financial assets referenced herein. Upon best information and belief Snow/Greenspan determined that Chinese officials had the ability and willingness to cooperate with petitioner in the recovery and transfer of substantial financial assets that had been in the care, custody and control of the Chinese for an extended period of time.

12. Premised on the representations of Secretary Snow and Chairman Greenspan, the legal services of Troutman Sanders, LLP and Jenkens & Gilchrist Parker Chapin, LLP (attorneys) were used to complete the preparation and administer the execution of agreements and documents referred to collectively as “settlement documents”. The following is a compilation of the significant parties that are represented as either obligors and/or beneficiaries of the settlement documents:

• Petitioner Wanta identified in this petition.
• Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (including but not limited to Land Baron/Xeno).
• National Security Agency (NSA).
• Department of Homeland Security.
• Director of National Intelligence.
• United States State Department.
• United States Department of the Treasury.
• United States Department of Defense.
• The White House, including but not limited to the Offices of the President and Vice President.
• C.B.I.C. Inc. (Mr William Bonney Sr.).
• China (PRC), France, Great Britain, Germany and other foreign nations participating under one or more international “Protocol” including but not limited to the Reagan-Mitterrand Protocol agreements.
• Others of interest not intentionally omitted as part of this petition.

The entirety of the financial assets mentioned in the settlement documents prepared by the above mentioned attorneys concerns approximately $27 Trillion United States Dollars in value. The portion attributable and payable to the petitioner is $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars.

13. In May of 2006 the People’s Republic of China caused a free and unrestricted transfer of $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars through international bank fund transfer facilities to an account at Bank of America located at Richmond, Virginia. The designated beneficiary of the transferred funds from the People’s Republic of China was Petitioner herein.

This transfer was made by the People’s Republic of China solely and exclusively as a requirement under the mentioned settlement agreement.

14. Upon best information and belief between the dates of July 31st to August 2nd of 2006 the United States Department of the Treasury, without authorization of either the remitting party or the receiving party removed the People’s Republic of China transferred financial assets from Bank of America Richmond, Virginia to an account in the name of Goldman Sachs at CITIBank New York, New York as the beneficiary holder of the monies transferred by the People’s Republic of China referenced above. This “Chip” (Clearing House Interbank Payment) transfer was facilitated from Virginia domiciled banks to New York domiciled banks via the Federal Reserve Bank Richmond.

The Chip transfer did not remove the name of Petitioner as the intended recipient of the transferred money from the People’s Republic of China. The transfer to the Goldman Sachs et al account at CITIBank put a lawless restriction that the funds were not to be released to Petitioner without the authorization of United States Treasury.

At or about the time of the unauthorized transfer mentioned in this paragraph 14 Petitioner protested the alleged right of “entitlement” by Secretary Paulson and to facilitate protest of right of ownership under the “Securities Acts” accounts were opened in the name of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. at Morgan Stanley, fiduciary client account at CITIBank/NYC to receive direct deposit transfer of Petitioner funds from Goldman Sachs.

15. The Petitioner has been contacted by “Compliance Officers” that are contract employees of the United States Department of the Treasury that the transfer records of the United States Department of the Treasury and the recipient (past and present holder of the funds transferred to Petitioner by the People’s Republic of China) reflect that the accounts opened to receive the financial assets are tagged and coded for the benefit of the Petitioner.

Access to the tagged and coded accounts requires lawless authorization to be provided in writing by Secretary Paulson. To date Secretary {Henry M.] Paulson refuses to provide the required written authorization to the compliance officers.

In addition one or more compliance officer (referenced herein) has been contacted by Secret Service Agents who have advised the compliance officers that the “White House” ordered that the compliance officers cease and desist from communicating in any manner with Petitioner.

16. Upon best information and belief the compliance officers mentioned in paragraph 15 have been in contact with law enforcement officers representing the Central Intelligence Agency and the United States Department of Defense.

These mentioned law enforcement officers confirm that the information provided by the compliance officers is true and correct and that upon best information and belief the “order” preventing Secretary Paulson from releasing the “tagged and coded” funds that are the sole and exclusive property of the Petitioner have been either lawlessly and individually controlled by Secretary Paulson and/or restricted through direct participation by other United States of America elected and/or nominated officials.

17. Upon best information and belief Troutman Sanders LLP and Jenkens & Gilchrist Parker Chapin LLP, seeking legal recourse on behalf of C.B.I.C. Inc. (Mr William Bonney Sr.) and the People’s Republic of China obtained an Order to Show Cause Why a Writ of Mandamus Should Not Be Issued from the United States Supreme Court signed by Justice Ginsberg. The People’s Republic of China, as a foreign government, invoked the original jurisdiction authority of the United States Supreme Court to obtain the document signed by Justice Ginsberg. Upon further best information and belief the responding parties to the action filed in the United States Supreme Court are exercising any and all assumed defenses to ward off the issuance of the Writ of Mandamus.

18. The United States Department of Justice and/or any agency or investigative authority contacted has refused to assist Petitioner in the collection of lawful funds. The said parties refuse such assistance irrespective that there is clear and undisputed evidence that the subject funds are identified in official United States government agency documents as being the sole and exclusive property of Petitioner. As of the date of the filing of this Petition, all requests for payment of lawful funds have been ignored by any and all elected and nominated public officials that have the implied and apparent authority to complete all requirements of the settled documents.

19. Petitioner individually and as sole and exclusive controlling shareholder of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. certifies as follows:

• The Petitioner has personally had conversations with one or more officials at the United States Department of the Treasury and said officials confirm the sequence of events concerning inward remittance of subject funds from the People’s Republic of China and inter-bank transfers within the United States.

• Petitioner confirms that he has personal knowledge about the “Claims and Background” set out in this Petition and verifies upon penalty of perjury that the same are true and correct.

• Petitioner has fully and completely reviewed the content of this petition and certifies by sworn affidavit attached hereto that the “Statement of Claim and Background” are true and correct.

• Upon best information and belief “Respondent” individuals, agencies, public, private, nominated and/or elected have knowingly, overtly, covertly and with specific intent conspired together to defraud Petitioner. The individual and/or conspiratorial acts amount to a violation of the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934 (as amended in 1970), the Bank Privacy Act, the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, specifically R.I.C.O. legislation and applicable international and national money laundering restrictions. In addition it is further the mentioned Respondents’ acting individually and/or “acting in concert” violate Petitioner’s rights under the provisions of H.R. 3723 as the same pertains to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties.

Reasonable action has been taken by the Petitioner in an attempt to obtain explanation and/or under what authority Respondents are not allowing the “Rule of Law” and permitting access by Petitioner to the financial accounts referenced herein. Despite continued written notice and request for a response the named parties continue to avoid their legal obligations and continue to commit covert and/or overt acts in furtherance of their knowing and purposeful violation of the statutory references mentioned hereinabove. In furtherance of this petition for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus Petitioners direct this Court’s attention to the letters and other communications that have been marked as Exhibits A, B and C (4) attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if the same were set out in their entirety in the body of this petition.

F. CONCLUSION:

21. The “Statement of Claim and Background” demonstrate “(1) the presence of novel and significant questions of law; (2) the inadequacy of other available remedies; and (3) the presence of a legal issue whose resolution will aid in the administration of justice”.

G. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:

1. Emergency consideration of this Petition with an expedited response time for Respondents to respond to this Petition and an expedited time for the Court to hear the merits of this matter.

2. Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper to protect the Constitutionally protected rights of the Petitioner.

Executed on this 18th day of June 2007.

[Signed]
LEE E. WANTA, LEO E. WANTA, AMBASSADOR LEO WANTA _Pro_Se
5516 Falmouth Street
Suite 108
Richmond, Virginia 23230: Petitioner
Telephone: 814 455 9218
Telefax: 202 330 5116

AFFIDAVIT

The undersigned, being fully advised by counsel of the seriousness of the claim of making false statements to a Court and being fully apprised of the consequences for committing perjury (and the associated penalties), hereby make the following statements concerning the petition for Writ of Mandamus being filed on my behalf, by my counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia:

1. I am more than twenty-one years of age and I am a citizen of the United States of America.

2. For an extended period of time I am functioning as a representative, investigator, contract employee and/or facilitator of one or more assignments that were either executed and/or performed at the direction and/or under the supervision of one or more persons and/or agencies that were accountable to the Executive Offices of the United States Government

3. During most recent three to five years I have been attempting to coordinate the repatriating of substantive financial resources from foreign locations to the United States and cause the tax payments owed on the patriated funds to be paid to the United States Treasury. I have substantially completed the stated objective task with the assistance of one or more foreign sources.

4. I have read the entirety of the Petition for Writ of Mandamus prepared by my attorneys. I confirm that I have personally directed communications with the banks, security firms, the United States Department of the Treasury (including one or more individual parties associated with the Treasury that are named as Respondents) and other entities mentioned in the Petition.

5. I have personally confirmed that the financial assets sent by the People’s Republic of China were received by Bank of America in Richmond, Virginia and that upon best information and belief the subject financial assets were “tagged” in my name and transmittal instructions by the People’s Republic of China directed that the same be paid to me without offset or delay.

6. I have been personally advised by agents and/or contract regulation compliance workers, that are accountable to the United States Department of the Treasury, that release of funds sent by the People’s Republic of China for payment to me is being restricted and/or blocked by one or more parties.

7. The exact party and/or parties that are restricting and/or blocking payment of financial assets to my designated accounts is not known absolutely.

8. Upon best information and belief the United States Department of the Treasury has the power and authority to direct release of the funds for my unrestricted use.

9. Despite continued demand for release of financial assets (that were transmitted by the People’s Republic of China) for payment to me personally the demands are ignored and are not rebuked by any responsive communication.

10. I have been personally informed by parties, that have the authority to release the block on funds leveraged against recipient banking accounts established in my name, that directives have been received from known and unknown parties that have the effect of negating my ability to have free and unrestricted access to financial assets that are “tagged” solely and exclusively in my name.

IN WITNESS HEREOF I am causing the above set forth affidavit to be notarized and sworn with full recognition of the penalty of perjury this 11th day of June 2007.

[Signed]
Lee E. Wanta, Leo E. Wanta and
Ambassador Leo E. Wanta

County of [omitted here]
State of [omitted here]

On this 11th day of June 2007 the above named individual, being personally known to me, appeared before me and after being first duly sworn signed the above Affidavit.

My commission expires January 5, 2009.

[Notary signature and seal].

(2): MOTION TO DISMISS OF RESPONDENT
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA,
Alexandria Division:

LEO E. WANTA, et al, Petitioner

V.

Henry M. Paulson, Jr., et al, Respondents

[Civil Action #1:07cv609 TSE/BRP]

MOTION TO DISMISS OF RESPONDENT
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND
Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., Respondent Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (“FRB Richmond”) moves to dismiss the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Other Extraordinary Relief (the “Petition”). The grounds of this Motion, as amplified in the attached Brief, are as follow.

For the purposes of this Motion only, all well pleaded facts will be taken as true.

Mr Wanta alleges that $4.5 trillion belonging to him was transferred by the People’s Republic of China, designated “for the sole and exclusive use and benefit” of Mr Wanta, to a branch of Bank of America in Richmond. Then the United States Department of Treasury “unlawfully” caused the funds to be transferred “via” FRB Richmond to an account in the name of Goldman Sachs at Citibank in New York, where they reside to this day. Finally, Mr Wanta says that it was the Department of the Treasury that placed a “lawless restriction” on the funds, and it is the Department of the Treasury that has the power to release the funds to him.

For the following reasons, the Petition does not state a claim on which relief can be granted:

1. On the face, the Petition shows that the funds are not in the custody or under the control of FRB Richmond.
2. On its face, the Petition shows that the only party with authority to release the funds is the Department of the Treasury.
3. Even assuming, for the purposes of this Motion, that a Federal Reserve Bank is an agency of the United States:
(a) There are no facts alleged that even suggest that FRB Richmond has a clear duty to Mr Wanta to do the act requested;
(b) There are no facts alleged that even suggest that Mr Wanta has a clear and undisputable right to the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus against FRB Richmond; and:
(c) On its face, the Petition shows that Mr Wanta has other available adequate remedies.

WHEREFORE, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond prays that this action be dismissed with prejudice and that it recover its reasonable costs and Counsel fees expended.

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND
By its attorneys
Frank E, Brown, Jr.
Virginia Bar Number 1030
Attorney for Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
Saunders and Brown, PLC
8280 Greensboro Drive, Suite 601
Mclean, VA 22102
Phone: (703) 506-1022
Fax: (703) 506-1095
gbrown@saundersbrown.com.

RICHMOND FED’S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
In its accompanying Brief in Support of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond’s Motion to Dismiss, which the Richmond Federal Reserve Bank’s attorneys submitted with its Motion to Dismiss, the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond further stated as follows:

‘For the purposes of this Motion and Brief only, all well pleaded facts will be taken as true….

Mr Wanta alleges that he is still named as beneficiary of the funds transfer. Therefore, he has an adequate remedy stated under Article 4A (Funds Transfers) of the Uniform Commercial Code by demanding that Citibank release to him funds held by the bank for his benefit. If the Bank refuses, all of the issues – Mr Wanta’s right to the funds, Mr Paulson’s right to freeze them – can be heard in a Court of New York which, governed by the specific rules of the Uniform Commercial Code, would have before it all the parties with the power and authority to grant the relief requested.

Respectfully submitted:
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND
By its attorneys.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time AMENDING AND INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE. In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

Save

Advertisements

BERNANKE PERSONALLY BLOCKING THE U.S. PAYOUTS

NEW YORK FED’S $500 TRILLION DERIVATIVES ‘BLACK HOLE’ IS EXPOSED

Sunday 6 September 2009 20:00

• ALL OFF-BALANCE SHEET FUNDS ARE ‘FROZEN’

• BERNANKE AND GEITHNER HAVE BEEN TAKING ORDERS FROM BUSH SR.

• UPDATE, 11 SEPTEMBER 2009:
IT HAS BEEN INACCURATELY ASSERTED ON ANOTHER WEBSITE THAT THE EDITOR PAID FOR WANTA’S RELEASE FROM JAIL. THIS IS AN OLD C.I.A. LIE WHICH HAS BEEN PROMULGATED FOR TWO YEARS OR MORE. The Editor did NOT procure Mr Wanta’s release from jail which of course is impossible. The Editor loaned Leo/Lee Wanta $35,000 for two years on an arms’-length basis at 7% compound per annum, effective 10th June 2005 and repayable on 11th June 2007.

• He did not repay the Editor’s $35,000. He has STOLEN THE EDITOR’S LOAN FUNDS.

The purpose of the loan was to settle Court ‘Restitution’ plus fees in respect mainly of State Tax of $14,129 plus interest that Wanta had already paid twice, in May and June 1992 (we hold copies of the relevant transaction documents). The Editor’s private loan funds paid this tax bill for the THIRD time. Full details of this scandal were exposed in our final report on that subject, dated 6th August 2007 [see Archive]. But that is NOT the main point of this insert, necessitated by the repetition of this old C.I.A. LIE, exploiting the timing of the loan. The LIE masks a colossal hornets’ nest of evil.

The main point is as follows. The subtle C.I.A.-originated LIE that the Editor paid for Wanta’s release from PRISON presupposes (deceitfully) that Wanta was released in 2005 WHICH IS NOT TRUE. On the contrary, Wanta was released from jail eight or ten days after 9/11 (on 19th or 21st September 2001). But by reiterating that the Editor’s funds procured Wanta’s release from JAIL, the FALSE impression is given that Wanta emerged from U.S. prison FOUR YEARS after 9/11: A FABRICATION.

Wanta was collected from jail shortly after 9/11 by Gerald Salchert, resident in the United States, of Austrian extraction, and taken to the home of a relative in Wisconsin.

WHY would the C.I.A. promulgate this LIE (and we will explain later WHO started this LIE)? In order to answer that question you need to be aware of the real reason Wanta was held in jail during the run-up to 9/11. The reason is that, since Wanta had been scammed and badly treated (which maybe he deserved: but that’s a separate point), the C.I.A. had concerns that he might divulge the 9/11 plans AHEAD OF THE ABOMINATION. So they held him incarcerated until afterwards.

• What does this tell you? Work it out for yourself! Mr Wanta KNEW ABOUT 9/11 IN ADVANCE of the event, and they had to make sure that he didn’t spill the beans because of his dissatisfaction at the way he had been treated. SO THEY HAVE EXPLOITED THE DATE OF THE EDITOR’S LOAN PAYMENT, WHICH OBTAINED WANTA’S EXIT FROM PROBATION (gaining him five years and two weeks, to be precise, as his scheduled probation end-date had been 28th November 2010), TO COVER UP THE FACT, EXPOSED BY THIS LIE, THAT THE C.I.A. AND THE U.S. GOVERNMENT KNEW ALL ABOUT 9/11 BEFORE IT HAPPENED. Because as Leo/Lee Wanta, who worked for the Government and the Bush Crime Syndicate, knew about 9/ 11 BEFORE the event, SO DID THE U.S. GOVERNMENT and the C.I.A. If you think this is DYNAMITE, you are 100% ACCURATE.

• OUR CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE STEALING OF OUR PUBLISHED WORKS AND BREACH OF
COPYRIGHT, AN OPERATION ORCHESTRATED BY THE C.I.A. TO ENTICE US INTO LITIGATION:

• On the morning of Monday 7th September, one of our associates walked into the offices of an operation in Utrecht, Netherlands, that had been engaged in the illegal stealing of the Editor’s work, published by Edward Harle Limited, entitled The New Underworld Order, which can ONLY be obtained legally direct from our London and New York offices and via this website [books section].

• Well over 10,000 copies of our book had been illegally stolen (downloaded) from mininova.com. The image of the book displayed on that website was cropped so that the ISBN ref: 1-899798-05-6 had been cut away, while the copyright page [page iv] was MISSING, indicating with crystal clarity that all concerned were fully aware that this represented a grievous copyright breach.

• Furthermore, the download text (of which we retain a complete paper copy and a pdf) was ADULTERATED. Confronted by our associate with a copy of the book, showing the cover and the copyright page, the Dutch perpetrators removed our book from their website immediately, thereby acknowledging the theft. The site in question deceitfully boasts that no material on their platform is copyright material, which is a brazen lie. We have other measures in store for this operation.

• Our associate rang the bell, knocked at the door, and then tapped at the window, in office hours. Personnel refused to let him into the building, but instead exited the front door and spoke to him in the street. Our associate showed our book to the two people who had emerged from the building, indicating that the front cover as shown on their website excluded the ISBN reference, and then opened the book at the copyright page. The personnel behaved in a somewhat shifty and rather insolent manner, accepted that they were in grievous breach of copyright, then retreated into the building, and proceeded to remove the adulterated version of The New Underworld Order from their website. By discourteously not allowing our associate to enter the building, they inadertently confirmed that the operation is an intelligence front. Very shabby, second rate tradecraft.

• A similar crooked entity in the Geneva area in Switzerland has stolen nearly 1,300 copies of our work, The Perestroika Deception, by the Soviet defector, Anatoliy Golitsyn, edited by Christopher Story, in which we hold world rights. The copyright belongs to Anatoliy Golitsyn. There will be repercussions from these brazen revolutionary thefts of the intellectual property of others.

• This places perpetratrors of these wanton thefts, which are designed to put smaller publishers out of business so that only the doctored, ‘politically correct’ ‘line’ on any sensitive subject stays in the public domain, on notice that we will take UNCONVENTIONAL MEASURES to close down this impertinent menace so far as we are concerned, and that we will make sure that perpetrators are shamed and named by all means at our disposal. As for the US Intelligence Power, you are also placed on notice that we will expose your dirty tricks and your snide attempts to inveigle us into financially destructive litigation. Your dirty tricks stink in the nostrils of the whole world.

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

CALLING EVIL GOOD, AND GOOD EVIL
‘Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!’

‘Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!’
Isaiah, Chapter 5, verses 20-21.

‘WE’LL KNOW OUR DISINFORMATION PROGRAM IS COMPLETE WHEN EVERYTHING THE AMERICAN PUBLIC BELIEVES IS FALSE’: William Casey, Director of Central Intelligence: An observation by the late Director at his first staff meeting in 1981. This observation reveals the mentality of cynicism which infests the US Federal control structures, and the reality that these structures regard the American people with total contempt. This attitude is the opposite to the noble concept of service to the American people which ought to inspire holders of public office, and therefore represents the epitome of decadence.

The evil spirit directing William Casey got the better of him when he committed suicide in hospital some years later, ostensibly to ‘protect the President’. The fantastic verbal fantasies perpetrated on certain US websites that are operating on the basis of Mr Casey’s principle, enunciated above, should therefore be handled with extreme care. Casey warned you!

HOW TO HANDLE OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THESE EVIL PEOPLE
‘Fret not thyself because of evil-doers, neither be thou envious against the workers of iniquity.
For they shall soon be cut down like the grass, and wither as the green herb’.
Psalm 37, verses 1 and 2.

‘The wicked plotteth against the just, and gnasheth upon him with his teeth. The Lord shall laugh at him: for he seeth that his day is coming. The wicked have drawn out the sword, and have bent their bow, to cast down the poor and needy, and to slay such as be of upright conversation. Their sword shall enter into their own heart, and their bows shall be broken’. Psalm 27, verses 12-15.

‘I have seen the wicked in great power, and spreading himself like a green bay tree. Yet he passed away, and lo, he was not; yea, I sought him, but he could not be found’. Psalm 37, verses 35-36.

‘The transgressors shall be destroyed together; the end of the wicked shall be cut off. But the salvation of the righteous is of the Lord; he is their strength in the time of trouble. And the Lord shall help them, and deliver them; he shall deliver them from the wicked, and save them, because they trust in Him’. Psalm 37, verses 38-40.

JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS ON FINANCIAL FRAUD:
‘Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you.

Your riches are corrupted, and your garments are motheaten.

Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days.

Behold, the hire of the labourers who have reaped down your fields, which is of you kept back by FRAUD, crieth; and the cries of them which have reaped are entered into the ears of the Lord….

Ye have lived in pleasure on the earth, and been wanton; ye have nourished your hearts, as in a day of slaughter. Ye have condemned and killed the just; and he doth not resist you’.
James, Chapter 5, verses 1-6.

• TWO IMPORTANT CONSEQUENCES FROM THE LATEST SABOTAGE

• BUSH SR. ET AL SUDDENLY REALISED DERIVATIVES ARE WORTH ZILCH

• GEORGE BUSH SR. NEEDED TO BE REMOVED AT ONCE

• 285 PROMINENT PEOPLE TO BE ARRESTED ‘BEFORE CHRISTMAS’

• SOME POSSIBLY RELATED SEPTEMBER DATES

• CHINESE MOVE TO IMMOBILISE THE DERIVATIVES SECTOR

• MEANWHILE GEITHNER CARRIES ON PROMOTING DERIVATIVES

• THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE

• FINANCIAL TIMES MINDLESSLY SUPPORTS GEITHNER’S DOOMED CAMPAIGN

• GEITHNER’S DECEITFUL DEMARCHE TO THE G-20

• TREASURY SECRETARY IS WHISTLING IN THE WIND

• SWISS PRIVATE BANK TELLS CLIENTS TO SELL U.S. ASSETS

• CIA NEVER MAKES MISTAKES, SO HOW CAN IT LEARN FROM THEM?

• PRESIDENTS 42 AND 43 FLY TO TORONTO AFTER THE FUNERAL

• THE REASON BUSH SR. DIDN’T APPEAR IN THE BASILICA

• NO SPLIT: JUST A NEW CORRUPTION ‘OPPORTUNITY’

• SCANDALOUS SITUATION AT THE WORLD COURT

• CANADA SUDDENLY POSTS US$-DENOMINATED BOND SALE

• UNITED ARAB EMIRATES TO KINDLY OBLIGE, AS WELL

• NEW YORK FED HAS A $500 TRILLION ‘BLACK HOLE’

• MORE BELATED CHINESE MEASURES AGAINST FRAUDULENT FINANCE

• ORIGINAL THEFT OF DELMARVA TIMBER TRUST ASSETS

• DESPITE THIS CRISIS, BERNANKE WAS BLOCKING THE PAYOUTS

• CIA-PRESIDENT OBAMA IN SECRET CAHOOTS WITH BERNANKE

• POOR BERNANKE A VICTIM OF IDENTITY FRAUD

• FED IS (WAS) NO-GO AREA FOR U.S. LAW ENFORCEMENT CADRES

• BARNEY FRANK BELATEDLY CALLS FOR THE FED TO BE AUDITED

•‘EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION’ OF TOP CRIMINALS REQUIRED

• LIBYAN CONTROVERSY IS A U.S. FALSE FLAG OPERATION

• DAVID RIFKIN, A U.S. SCUMBAG, LECTURES US ON THE BBC

• THE CHENEY OIL OPERATION IN LIBYA

• BRITISH SIMPLY TOOK A LEAF OUT OF THE U.S. BOOK

• CHENEY TRYING TO DESTROY U.S.-UK COOPERATION

• THE UNANSWERED AFGHANISTAN QUESTION JUST GOT NASTIER

• INSPIRING EXAMPLE SET BY THE MAYOR OF DONCASTER

• BRITISH MINISTRY OF DEFENCE IS BETRAYING THE PEOPLE

• A GLIMPSE OF REVOLUTIONARY REALITY IN THE BURMA CONTEXT

• BUSH PUSHED WAY BEYOND CO-CONSPIRATORS’ TOLERANCE

• SATAN WAS NOT CALLED THE SERPENT FOR NOTHING

• THE SERPENT IS A DISCIPLE OF LENIN [or rather, vice versa]

• TAKEN BY SURPRISE, THE SERPENT COULDN’T ORGANISE ITS OWN DEFENCE

• NO ‘GUTS’ ARE NEEDED! JUST DO IT!!

• WHEN WE STAND UP TO THEM, THEY ‘FALL BACK TO THE GROUND’

• INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW: Volume 34, Numbers 3 & 4 was published on 14th August and was being mailed worldwide on Monday 17th August 2009. It contains our devastating blow-by-blow reporting of astonishing behind-the-scenes events tearing the lawless intergovernmental environment apart, where anything goes, assets are ‘diverted’, and no-one is responsible.

However, as a specific consequence of these exposures, the net is decisively closing in on ALL criminalist financial operators, both within notorious official structures and in the international financial community, as is becoming clearer by the day. This 592-page report on what has been happening behind the scenes is now being lodged in places ‘where it matters’ around the world, which means that it is impossible for a veil to be drawn over this financial criminality, EVER.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice are comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor’s study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing global financial corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Just press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard. Or press the live Donate link at the top right-hand corner of this page. See also the ADVERTISEMENT below.

• The Editor’s $35,000 Wanta bail-out LOAN money plus interest has been stolen. This has not been denied for all the time that this true statement has been posted at this location! Wunderbar!

• See the second white panel for details of our latest distributed intelligence publications.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation, are appended at the foot of this report, below the legal data. See also our catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

• COPYRIGHT NOTICE REFERENCING THE STEALING OF OUR COPYRIGHTED BOOKS BY U.S. COPYRIGHT PIRATES APPEARS AT FOOT OF THIS REPORT ABOVE THE LEGAL DEFINITIONS.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and our ‘politically incorrect’ intelligence books online from this website.

NEW REPORT AND NOTES START HERE:

• NOTE:
This report covers developments and intelligence sifted up to a cut-off point of Thursday evening UK time, 3rd September 2009. THE U.S.-RELATED SEGMENTS ARE OUT OF DATE. We regret that, due to ‘the unfolding of events’ [Lenin: see Note (8) below] we cannot update beyond the cut-off time and neither can we comment any further for a number of days ahead. The narrative should be considered solely as ‘informed background’. The segment originally prepared for posting on 2nd September is clearly indicated. In some contexts, the tenses employed have not been altered.

• LEO WANTA: For the past several months or so, Wanta has been residing in a ‘safe house’ and has not continued in the residence of a family member. This confirmed development throws our earlier observations of the legal bind he was in due to his presence in Wisconsin, up in the air: and one reason for the move may precisely have been to address those issues.

Additionally, a number of wholly inconsequential ‘postings’ mentioning or attributed to Wanta which have appeared on one or more other websites, have represented elements of a ruse to throw sand in the faces of ‘the curious’. Their purpose will have been to provide a modicum of ‘continuity’ and to throw ‘the curious’ off the scent.

It remains a fact that the Editor’s $35,000 loan plus interest has been stolen. A letter from Leo Wanta indicating that he could not pay for the time being, due to his circumstances, would have sufficed to alleviate matters in the interim, but this was not forthcoming.

It would be no excuse at this late stage to say that he could not place such a matter in writing, since we hold a large library of undertakings that he has placed in writing, together with detailed faxed instructions to the Editor of this service. If he has been taken to a ‘safe house’ to hide him from the legal consequences of his theft(s), that could be construed as a provocative slap in the face of the Editor. But of course there are other, more pressing, reasons, no doubt.

The overall intelligence community lesson to be learned from this is that if intelligence operatives are going to interface with real investigative journalists, they had better not engage in tradecraft deception, or the likelihood will be that roadside timebombs will blow up in their faces.

• Put more succinctly: DO NOT PRESUME YOU CAN HOODWINK ALL THE PRESS ALL OF THE TIME. And surely, it should be obvious, now that Herr Bush Sr. is discredited, that the ‘bait and switch’ and ‘double-cross’ deception techniques, extensively publicised here, when deployed against journalists, are thoroughly discredited and past their sell-by date, as well.

• MEMORANDUM TO THOSE WHO TRIED TO DISCREDIT THE EDITOR VIA GORDON THOMAS, ‘THE VISITOR’ AND DASTYCH: These sordid techniques cannot be relied upon to deliver the anticipated results, since not everybody responds in textbook fashion to threats. At the latest count, the Editor had received 28 threats.

• A history of the deceptions perpetrated against the Editor is pending.

ALL OFF-BALANCE SHEET FUNDS ARE ‘FROZEN’
Following the ‘lockdown’ of the $14+ trillion of REAL on-the-books funds, including the previously referenced $6.2 trillion of LOAN money, on 10-12 September 2008, all off-balance sheet funds, the source of which cannot be identified, have been totally frozen and cannot be brought back onto the balance sheet. The CEO of Alchemy Partners, Jon Moulton, has now ‘jumped’ because of this.

Once the overdue Settlement payments in the United States have been unblocked by Dr Ben Bernanke, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, and Timothy Geithner, the US Treasury Secretary, both the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve will cease to exist in the format to which they and the world are accustomed, as they will necessarily be Basel-II (and Basel-III) compliant, which will mean that the most important question in the world – ‘What is the source of funds?’ – will govern ALL FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS. The dual system, with separate sets of books, will collapse.

The crisis has therefore reflected the ruthless determination of a handful of criminal US finance operatives, headed of late by Bernanke and Geithner, taking orders from Bush Sr., to defy the wishes of the international community by blocking the US dimension of the Settlement payouts in order to sustain this double-minded, corrupt system of ‘two sets of books’ that is collapsing.

BERNANKE AND GEITHNER WERE TAKING ORDERS FROM BUSH SR.
According to our sources, these two US criminal finance operatives were still interfering with the payments during the period of 48 hours when we held back a report prepared for posting effective 2nd September. It has been suggested by some that we made a mistake by announcing this fact, as our brief statement signifying the postponement was initially claimed to have been exploited by the criminal finance cadres to obfuscate the situation temporarily, to what they considered to be their advantage. On the other hand, we also received support for this action, as is typified by the rather flattering email reproduced in Note (1) and posted on another website.

• In any case, the final outcome shows that our judgment was in fact correct.

TWO IMPORTANT CONSEQUENCES OF THE LAST SABOTAGE
Nothing of significance had been lost because not only was it obvious from other evidence that the payout last week was about to be sabotaged anyway, but this episode did achieve the following outcomes, so we are informed:

• It decisively flushed out George H. W. D. V. D. Bush Sr. as issuing demands, instructions and physical threats to unnamed personnel, requiring them to sustain the sabotage operation.

Our information is that these threats were of a PHYSICAL nature – a quite interesting development, since this revealed that Bush Sr. HAD NO FINANCIAL LEVERAGE ANY MORE (for bribes), which we know to be the case. So he was forced to resort to barefaced murder threats instead.

• We are informed that certain parties have FINALLY, at long last, UNDERSTOOD, that one cannot reach any agreements or understandings AT ALL with serpents [see text at the foot of this report]. Quite astonishingly, we were told on 4th September that certain US personnel who ought to have found this out years ago, were at last obliged to acknowledge that one cannot negotiate with these people and that they need to be removed from the scene.

Hard though it may be for rational observers to comprehend, what we and others have recognised almost since the beginning, has ONLY NOW become apparent to the US cadres we are obliquely referring to here – as a DIRECT consequence of the sabotage operation perpetuated by Bernanke and Geithner and ordered by Bush Sr., which messed up the Settlements payments that were ready to go as of 1:00pm Eastern Daylight Time On Wednesday 2nd September 2009.

BUSH SR. ET AL SUDDENLY REALISED THE DERIVATIVES ARE WORTH ZILCH
Apparently this development was attributable, sources say, to the fact that certain fools stupidly offered Bush Sr. 2% (alternatively stated to be 2.5%) of some unquantified derivatives aggregate, which the serpent ‘turned down’. What all concerned appear not to have understood is that 2.0% or 2.5% of zero equals zero. Therefore, farcically, Bush Sr. actually turned down nothing. It was at this point that Bush Sr. appears to have realised that the Fraudulent Finance derivatives ‘assets’ are immobilised and de facto locked out of the on-the-books financial economy. Apparently when that happened, scales fell off certain previously blinded cadres’ eyes, and, at half past midnight, they realised that ‘one cannot reach agreement with serpents’. Quite why they couldn’t see that obvious fact when you and this Editor saw it years ago, is not explained. (Presumably it reflects the fact that some were corrupted and hoping to cut deals out of the funny money for themselves).

In this connection, certain sources advised us that, notwithstanding the above, ‘Bush Sr. is out of the picture’ – which is true; and yet, he was reported to us last week to have been issuing physical threats of liquidation, intimidating officials and bankers, and influencing the deception operations presided over by Bernanke and Geithner, whose ever more eccentric public statements continued to purport to assume that the off-balance sheet world could be restored to its former fraudulent glory – the current focus being on removing the infuriating British from all positions of influence and power as quickly as possible, and packing the international forums that matter with corrupt Third World operatives who can be relied upon to do what the US criminal financiers require.

[This plot is about to falter, too].

GEORGE BUSH SR. NEEDED TO BE REMOVED AT ONCE
Given this background, we were specifically asked last week to state that George Bush Sr. needed to be removed from the scene completely and IMMEDIATELY, not least given that his vituperative threats of murder which were reportedly being sprayed all over the place, were liable to lead to his arrest for uttering threats over the phone, which is a Federal offence (2) .

• Moreover we felt that the British Monarchical Power had every right, and should now proceed, to take the necessary drastic action against George H. W. D. V. D. Bush Sr. and the other American and UK financial terrorists, without further ado.

Hitherto no-one in the United States appears to have had the guts to do this. But this serpent is FINISHED, except that he appeared as late as last week STILL to have been able to interfere with the Settlements. It was being pointed out to us that Americans operate 800 bases around the world financed by funny money, and flaunt themselves as the big, most powerful military machine on the block: yet their cowardice HAS DISGUSTED the whole world because they appear to be so corrupt and compromised that they lack the guts to stamp on the head of this serpent.

That the serpent’s head has to be crushed is universally recognised AND IT MUST HAPPEN NOW, with no further feeble, pathetic prevarication indicative of inner rottenness and weakness – a state of affairs that is simply reinforcing international perceptions, where it matters, of the United States as an internally depraved pariah state.

Indeed we were advised by sources with European connections that this latest sabotage of the Settlements was likely to trigger an operation ‘to “hit” the Obama/Bush cartel if we aren’t paid tomorrow’ [email from an informed source, at 6:01pm UK time on Thursday 3rd September] (3) .

285 PROMINENT FIGURES TO BE ARRESTED
Another usually well-informed source (US) advised us on 4th September that ‘all 285 people’ who have been engaged in this criminal finance sabotage to block the payouts and associated matters concerning immense corruption ‘WILL BE ARRESTED BY CHRISTMAS’.

• We think this will occur rather sooner than that.

SOME DATES THOUGHT EARLIER TO BE SIGNIFICANT
It was also reported to us that the threats spewed out by the serpent were accompanied by an assertion, known to be false, that the payouts were to be blocked ‘until 15th September’. This of course was equivalent to saying ‘until the end of the solar system’, except for the following two important passing considerations:

• As reported in The Wall Street Journal on 3rd September (4) : ‘On September 16 2009, China will put into effect an agreement governing how their banks trade domestic derivative products among themselves. But as a condition of their dealing with foreign banks, China’s five largest commercial banks are seeking to impose tough credit demands that will be hard to comply with, according to certain lawyers and people at several foreign banks’.

CHINESE MOVE TO IMMOBILISE DERIVATIVES OPERATIONS
The Chinese banks concerned are Bank of China Ltd, Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd., China Construction Bank, Agricultural Bank of China Co., and Bank of Communications. The Wall Street Journal report elaborated that these Chinese banks ‘dominate the domestic money markets, supplying as much as 80% of market liquidity. Not being able to deal with them would punch a big hole in the operations of foreign banks in China’.

‘Under the new régime, banks will be allowed to trade [financially – Ed.] only with counterparties with whom they have signed a Master Agreement. That agreement will initially cover existing trading in interest-rate swaps, bond forwards, foreign exchange swaps and forwards, and cross-currency swaps. But the five big banks are insisting that foreign banks, and in some cases their major shareholders, guarantee the credit of their China units before they sign any agreement, according to foreign bankers with direct knowledge of the situation’.

‘Under existing arrangements, foreign banks can trade derivatives with the five big [Chinese] banks without providing credit guarantees’.

In other words, financial trading with the big five Chinese banks will, effective 16th September 2009, be restricted to THE FIRST LEVEL ONLY, cutting out a vast swathe of subsequent levels of derivative trades – which necessary reform will VIRTUALLY TERMINATE the derivatives operations of foreign banks with China. Unless the big Chinese banks have signed a Master Agreement with a foreign bank counterparty, they will not be permitted to engage in derivatives transactions AT ALL: hence the bleating by ‘lawyers and people at several foreign banks’ that their business is about to be decimated, destroyed or altered beyond recognition.

While the foregoing information on the Chinese trading stipulation is of exceptional significance, it will also of course have been noted that 16th September is one day later than the false ‘deadline’ fed by the criminal finance Godfather, George H. W. D. V. D. Bush Sr. During the week there were further ‘end of the solar system’ noises, too, suggesting, incorrectly, that the end of the current US fiscal year (30 September) would be the ‘next’ illicit ‘deadline’. Another significant fixture in this context was the late-September meeting of the Group of 20 scheduled for Pittsburgh, preparatory work for which was being transacted in London in early September.

Consistently with the correct Chinese attitude that ‘enough is enough already’, Associated Press reported on 3rd September that China is buying the first $50 billion of the International Monetary Fund’s initial Special Drawing Right (SDR) bond sale. Although this announcement was presented for public consumption in the usual knee-jerk context, promulgated in the IMF’s own statement [2nd September 2009] that this purchase ‘will boost the Fund’s capacity to help its membership weather the global financial crisis, and facilitate early recovery of the global economy’, the Chinese authorities paid for the purchase of $50 billion worth of SDRs with 341.2 billion yuan but in fact, by means of a complex foreign exchange configuration, disguising the fact that they were dumping dollars in order not to destabilise the market – a move which, as Zhang Bin, an international finance specialist at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said will ‘help to raise China ’s IMF status’.

MEANWHILE GEITHNER CARRIED ON WEIRDLY PROMOTING DERIVATIVES
While the Chinese have made it crystal clear that the Fraudulent Finance derivatives party is OVER, the US Treasury Secretary, who presided over the accumulation of the derivatives BLACK HOLE within the Federal Reserve Bank of New York of which he was President amounting to $500 trillion [see below], is attempting to bamboozle the Group of Twenty leaders into taking steps to ‘control’ the derivatives markets – the unspoken purpose of this deception being to ‘take it for granted’ that these Fraudulent Finance operations are to continue, which is not going to be the case.

Specifically, The Wall Street Journal reported on 4th September 2009 that ‘on Thursday, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner sent a letter to the G-20 leaders [meeting in preparatory session in London – Ed.], arguing that international agreement on higher bank-capital rules was necessary to protect the global financial system [unspoken: which his own terrorist finance stewardship at the New York Fed has so grievously corrupted – Ed.], and he called for a deal by the end of 2010’.

• FACT: It is STANDARD revolutionary procedure to keep kicking the timeframe out into the future. Every conference is concerned with setting the agenda for the subsequent conference. That way, the ‘Useful Idiocracy’ is bamboozled into believing that ‘progress’ (however defined) is being made towards whatever objective may be flavour of the month. Meanwhile the serpentine manipulators obfuscate the situation while always gaining more time.

•FACT: The US Treasury Secretary’s stance is deceitful. On the one hand, he and Bernanke were sabotaging and blocking the releases as stated above, on the orders of the world’s most sought-after financial criminal; while on the other hand, he is masquerading before the G-20 as a valiant defender of financial law and order. According to what we have been informed, this two-faced (dialectical, double-minded) behaviour isn’t being well received.

On the contrary, M. Jean-Claude Trichet, President of the European Central Bank, in announcing that ‘the ECB has an exit strategy from its non-standard measures in place’ (5) has, of late, most interestingly, aligned his institution effectively with the British Monarchical Power (contrary to the underlying purposes of the European Union Collective, which is to destroy all sources of British power permanently). The reason for this volte face is that the potential exists within this financial maelstrom for the European financial economy to be completely destroyed, since the collective currency, the Euro, has no backing – and is supported by no sovereign government. The European Union is not a sovereign entity: it is in fact an illusory construct which operates specifically, as the Editor reported and explained in his book The European Union Collective: Enemy of its Member States’, to usurp and crush the sovereignty of its weakened constituent satrap membership.

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE
Moreover the accounts of the European Commission have not been signed off for the past 14 years running by the EU’s own Court of Auditors, because they are fraudulent.

• Any auditor signing the European Commission’s accounts would lay himself open to prosecution for aiding and abetting false accounting.

Since this is the case, the British Government, for instance, is complicit in financial fraud because it channels UK taxpayers’ funds into the accounts of the European Commission which, given that its accounts are fraudulent and have been demonstrated to be fraudulent for the past 14 years, is a criminal enterprise. According to the Serious Fraud Office in London, it is illegal to pay taxpayers’ money into the hands of a criminal enterprise.

As previously recommended here, all British taxpayers’ VAT funding should therefore be diverted forthwith into special accounts at the British Treasury, where they can accumulate until such time as the past 14 years’ EC accounts have been rectified, restitution has been made for all the funds that have been misdirected and stolen, all officials, past and present, involved in these criminal diversions and thefts have been indicted and put on trial, and the British Government pronounces itself to be satisfied that the necessary standards of financial probity have finally been achieved.

Since of course this will never happen, the British Government could redeploy the accrued Value Added Tax inflows for the purposes of plugging the colossal holes punched recklessly into them by the Brown Government, and reviving the British economy which has been extensively ‘enronised’ by the operations of Godfather Bush in collaboration with his corrupt and subsequently double-crossed pal, Tony Blair (who has his come-uppance).

In the meantime, by aiding and abetting the criminal diversion of British taxpayers’ VAT funds, the British Government condemns itself as a co-conspirator in defrauding British taxpayers, and is therefore entitled to be classed as a Criminal Government (and not for this reason alone: but this will ‘do’ for the time being).

All of which further complicates the standing of the corrupt European Commission itself, even as it is being bombarded by the banks as they lobby this criminal enterprise intensively to try to prevent the inevitable confirmation that the Fraudulent Finance bonanza is almost totally finished – which of course will consign certain of these institutions that specialise in speculation, to oblivion.

FINANCIAL TIMES MINDLESSLY SUPPORTS CAMPAIGN
This campaign is being supported by the industry’s house organ, The Financial Times, London, which reported on 2nd September that ‘top investment banks and other big users of derivatives markets’ [prior to mid-September 2008, but this is never mentioned because those concerned don’t want to acknowledge that the derivatives sector remains moribund – Ed.] ‘have warned European Union regulators that there are limits to the extent to which over-the-counter contracts can be standardised and cleared centrally’.

“Standardisation is not a clear prerequisite for delivering the systemic and operational risk improvements sought by regulators… initiatives that would seek to standardise the terms of all OTC contracts are counterproductive”.

• This was the message to the European Commission [EC] from three associations representing investment banks and securities firms: the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, and the London Investment Banking Association, in a joint submission to the EC made public on 3rd September.

“Such initiatives can lead to ineffective hedging and incomplete transfer of risk. Leaving end-users with unwanted and unmanageable basis – that is, a mismatch between the specific risks they face and the non-specific, generic instruments that would be available in the market’ (6).

But The Financial Times’ idolatry of the dying Fraudulent Finance derivatives sector was sharply rebuffed on 4th September, when The Daily Telegraph’s Business section led with an article on the turmoil which has overtaken one of the most prominent of British private equity funds, Alchemy Partners, with the departure of its founder John Moulton – who, like the sharpest operators in this business, see the writing on the wall and are getting out IMMEDIATELY, so leaving the impending wreckage to others (who do not seem to realise what will be hitting them).

• Moulton’s exit will lead to a change in the ‘key man’ clause – entitling investors (leading banks, pension funds, university endowments and high net worth individuals) to pull out of their financial commitments to the fund (provided they can do so in practice, given the ‘unfolding of events’) because they will no longer benefit from Mr Moulton’s standing, prestige and expertise.

Amid expectations that Moulton’s departure would undermine Alchemy’s chances of raising fresh capital from investors, one insider was reported to have observed:

‘Alchemy certainly won’t be able to draw down any cash. In this market, people are desperate to get out of commitments and when they see an opportunity they grab it’ (7).

This devastating admission from a private equity fund ‘insider’ tells you, in one succinct sentence, that the obtuse behaviour of Geithner and Bernanke flies in the face of objective reality, common sense and the INEVITABLE ‘unfolding of events’ (8).

GEITHNER’S DECEITFUL DEMARCHE TO THE G-20
In parallel with this campaign, Mr Geithner surfaced in The Financial Times house organ on the 3rd September with a thinly-disguised plea for the colossal stash of illicit off-balance sheet funds to be plonked onto the books – thereby of course supposedly perpetuating the old Fraudulent Finance vortex to the satisfaction of George H. W. D. V. D. Bush Sr. In other words, this Geithner was STILL promoting the decapitated US Fraudulent Finance agenda – in the teeth of the opposition from the European Commission and the British Monarchical Power.

The essence of this deceitful operation fronted by Geithner was selling the G-20 the illusion that the US authorities are masters of regulation, when in fact the whole purpose of their rearguard campaign was to kill stone dead the necessary reform which cannot be stopped – namely that ALL transactions are to take place ON the books, consigning all the accumulated fraudulent derivatives accruals held off-balance sheet to the numeral ZERO.

• That of course will permanently defang the criminal finance syndicate, while impoverishing the cabal which had been holding the world to ransom (to the extent that it is not already impoverished by virtue of the freezing of its corrupt accounts).

The deceitful Geithner agenda was revealed in the first of five priorities which he spelt out in his article for the house organ of the City of London and beyond:

• Geithner: ‘First, capital requirements for banks simply must be higher across the board. Bringing more capital into the banking system is vital’.
• Translation: For ‘bringing more capital into the banking system’, read: Tipping off-balance sheet funds onto the books (while paying lip-service to Basel-II etc: see below).

• ‘Geithner: ‘Second, the regulatory framework also should put a greater emphasis on higher-quality forms of capital that best enable financial groups to absorb losses. Consistent with this principle, during good economic times, common equity should constitute a large majority of a bank’s Tier 1 capital’. • Translation: ‘Derivatives ‘assets’ are ‘a higher form of capital’.

• Geithner: ‘Third, capital requirements and accounting rules should be more forward-looking and should reduce the system’s pro-cyclicality. The capital régime should require banks to hold a larger buffer over their minimum capital requirements during good times, to be available in bad times’.
• Translation: ‘We don’t want real regulations which will constrain our permissive money-making behaviour. What we want is regulations made of India rubber which ‘go with the flow’ and that we can abuse and circumnavigate to suit our requirements’.

• Geithner: ‘Fourth, banks should be subject to explicit liquidity standards designed to improve their resilience in the face of runs by creditors and prevent the build-up of liquidity risk in the financial system as a whole’.
• Translation: ‘I am parodying Basel-II in order to bamboozle the G-20 into accepting my permissive agenda, without them realising what I’m up to’.

• Geithner: ‘Finally, we need to improve the rules used to measure risks embedded in the banks’ portfolios and the capital required to protect against them, and put greater constraints on banks’ use of leverage to dampen volatility’.
• Translation: Sounds nice, but see his fourth ‘point’ above: I am parodying Basel-II in order to bamboozle the G-20 into accepting my permissive agenda, without them realising what I’m up to.

• Geithner [final paragraph in his Financial Times (house organ) article]:
‘Strengthening capital requirements is an essential part of a broader effort to modernize [sic!] our regulatory framework so that the financial system is strong enough to withstand the failure of large complex institutions. That is the most effective way to prevent the world from re-living the events of last autumn [unspoken: which I personally, while I was President of the FRBNY, did so much to facilitate]. And that is the challenge we must tackle in London, Pittsburgh and beyond [unspoken: Pay attention to what I am saying, G-20].
• Translation: ‘Part of a broader effort to MODERNIZE’ = ‘to DUMB DOWN, so that we can wantonly infiltrate the off-balance sheet derivatives accruals onto the banks’ balance sheets under cover of the permissive regulatory régime intended by Paulson, myself and Bernanke, in the service of the criminal finance syndicate which we serve.

• In other words, we are in charge, and we reject the Basel disciplines while paying lip-service to them for public consumption and in order to hoodwink you G-20 attendees’ (9).

Geithner evidently thinks that he can outsmart the international community and the G-20 by sticking the Basel words back to them – using Basel-type language deceitfully in order to convey, with the naïve assistance of The Financial Times, an impression of wholesome regulatory rectitude – while in fact meaning the opposite. We and others, including the President of the European Central Bank, see right through this dialectic, as do the Chinese authorities.

• So it will ‘go nowhere’ – for this reason alone.

THE U.S. TREASURY SECRETARY IS WHISTLING IN THE WIND
The Geithner deception campaign is being waged in parallel with the overdue and drastic steps that will be taken, effective 16th September 2009, outlined above, by the Chinese authorities. This illustrates the fact that the US Treasury Secretary, who, with Dr Bernanke, was willfully BLOCKING the Settlement payouts which, by definition, will liquefy the banks (to the extent that payout monies have not been stolen), is whistling in the wind.

How does he expect his decadent formula to fly, in the face of the Chinese determination that it shall not fly, and in the face of the 100% transparent, fully taxable, on-the-books Dollar Refunding programme to be operated from London?

SWISS PRIVATE BANK TELLS CLIENTS TO SELL ALL U.S. ASSETS
On a separate note, but by way of illustrating how strands of ‘globalism’ are unravelling, Bloomberg reported on 2nd September that one of Switzerland’s oldest banks, Wegelin & Co., has told wealthy clients to sell their US assets, or remove their funds from the bank. The bank’s Managing Partner, Konrad Hummler, explained that US proposals to extend reporting requirements for banks with clients who acquire US stocks and bonds, together with estate tax liabilities that may be inherited by heirs of people with such holdings, had prompted the decision.

“We came to the conclusion that it’s a threat to our clients”, Herr Hummler, who is also President of the Swiss Private Bankers’ Association, said in the course of an interview during a conference in Zürich. ‘It’s also a threat to us as a bank because as a custodian we are an executor to the estate. We find this aspect discomforting, so we recommend selling all American securities whatsoever”.

Herr Hummler added that he intended to raise the issue on 4th September at a meeting of the Private Bankers’ Association, members of which include Pictet & Cie., Lombard Odier & Cie., and Mirabaud & Cie. After initial reservations, they were considering following suit.

• The report originally intended for publication on 2nd September 2009 starts here:

CIA NEVER MAKES MISTAKES, SO HOW CAN IT LEARN FROM THEM?
At the VIP showing of ‘Four Presidents and a Funeral’ held at the Boston Catholic Basilica of Our Lady of Perpetual Help [sic], CIA-‘President’ Barack Hussein Obama spoke about ‘learning from our mistakes and growing from our failures’.

However since the CIA never makes mistakes, it is hardly in any position to learn from them. But given that certain of those present were Grand Masters of manipulative cynicism, it is not out of place here to consider what the ‘President’ may actually have meant by these ‘inspirational’ words.

One definite possibility is that he was speaking in code to ‘the interested’ seated hypocritically en masse in the Basilica, signalling to those with ears to hear that the highest-level current and former operatives have ‘learned’ from the catastrophic mess they have made of the finances of the United States, the world, and their own pockets, by stumbling upon a new ‘wheeze’ to make money for themselves: hence ‘growing from our failures’.

PRESIDENTS 42 AND 43 FLY TO TORONTO AFTER THE FUNERAL
Let us explain. On the self-same day of the funeral, former President William Jefferson-Clinton AND former President George W. Bush flew at once to Toronto. The Toronto Star plastered a picture of Mr Clinton duly lecturing an audience of Canadian fans on ‘Embracing our Common Humanity’ – a dangerous title, one would have thought, for Clinton to employ, given that he used to embrace a Canadian MP of Austrian extraction during his frequent trysts in Canada of yore, a lady considered by some to be ‘common to humanity’.

But be that as it may, it stands to reason that Messrs Clinton and Bush Jr. rushed up to Canada for reasons OTHER THAN Clinton’s eagerness to enlighten a collection of extremely naïve Canadians – some of whom, according to The Toronto Star [31st August 2009] declared 42 to be ‘a marvellous fellow’, a ‘wonderful man’ and ‘an icon’, thereby lending new meaning to the phrase ‘Oval Office carpet’. The reasons for the Two Criminal Presidents’ haste to visit Toronto, are examined below.

THE REASON BUSH SR. DIDN’T APPEAR IN THE BASILICA
But first, we need to reconsider the ‘Four Presidents and a Funeral’ scene. They turned out to be NOT the Four Criminal Presidents who had DEMANDED and obtained their immunities on Thursday 22nd August 2009, as previously reported, but rather the Four Criminal Presidents MINUS George H. W. D. V. D. Godfather Bush Sr. – the stand-in being the ever-sunny and likeable President Jimmy Carter, who attended with his wife, the Steel Magnolia. So why, obviously, was the Godfather of all Godfathers missing from this happy gathering?

Why, none other than because George Bush Sr. had attempted to intervene with the settlements process that had in fact started on Thursday 27th August, continuing into Saturday, the day of the funeral. He is likely to have paid dearly for this last throw of the dice.

NO SPLIT: JUST A NEW CORRUPTION ‘OPPORTUNITY’
Bush Sr.’s absence from the funeral Mass gave rise to speculation on our part as to whether the Three Remaining Criminal Presidents had split from Godfather Bush – a proposition given some apparent weight by the nonchalant and goofily relaxed demeanour of former President George Bush Jr. at the Mass – to which the answer is ‘not really’.

On the contrary, Mr Bush Jr. was happy inter alia because he was about to fly to Canada with his criminal predecessor to clinch a deal which these operatives vainly hoped will float them out of the quagmire they’re in, characterised by the lugubrious fact that most of their accounts are frozen.

Before we visit Canada ourselves, though, a word about the World Court’s earlier behaviour. It proved impossible for us to obtain reliable indications as to whether suggestions that the Four Criminal Presidents’ craved immunities had in fact been revoked just as quickly as they were so scandalously granted. Given that Clinton 42 and Bush 43 surfaced in Toronto immediately after the funeral gathering, the balance of probability might have seemed to be that those reports were false or mistaken – although in view of the Canadian behaviour exposed immediately below, the Toronto authorities may have waived aside any such little local difficulties.

SCANDALOUS SITUATION AT THE WORLD COURT
There is also a peculiar, and quite scandalous, state of affairs within the World Court itself, which apparently enables individual Judges to annul what other World Court Judges have approved. The President of the World Court these days is Hisashi Owada (Japan), while the Vice-President of the Court is Peter Tomka (Slovakia). The Judges are: Shi Jiuyong (China); Mr Abdul G. Koroma (Sierra Leone); Awn Shawkat Al-Khasawneh (Jordan); Thomas Buergenthal (United States); Bruno Simma (Germany); Ronny Abraham (France: sic!); Kenneth Keith (New Zealand); Bernardo Sepúlveda-Amor (Mexico); Mohamed Bennouna (Morocco); Leonid Skotnikov (The Russian Federation); António A. Cançado Trinidade (Brazil); Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf (Somalia); and Christopher Greenwood (United Kingdom). The Registrar is Philippe Couvreur (Belgium).

With the likely exception of the Chinese and the New Zealand Judges, the ONLY World Court Judge who might be suspected of being liable to act honourably, would be Christopher Greenwood, the British Representative. And IF it is the case that a given World Court Judge can annul what other Judges or the Court itself have decided in the context of immunities, it stands to reason that one would expect this Thomas Buergenthal character have stood ready at all times to sabotage the decisions of other Judges, the World Court itself, or all of the above. No wonder the reputation of this globalist institution, which provides scant information concerning its operations, has sunk into the gutter along with those of the Four Criminal Presidents and the United States itself. [Note: the figure four in this context will be seen to require adjustment – up to the figure five].

Anyway, the complacent nonchalance and demeanour of former US Presidents 42 and 43 as they sat through CIA-President Obama’s eulogy for the deceased Edward Kennedy (‘one musn’t speak ill of the dead’, as one VIP noisily pointed out later), will have been enhanced by any stray thoughts they may have entertained during those proceedings concerning the infinite malleability of the Court.

Granted, the Four Criminal Presidents naïvely considered that they DEFINITELY NEEDED their immunities, otherwise they wouldn’t have DEMANDED them back on 22nd August, as we reported. At the same time, given the composition of this discredited globalist institution, the Two Criminal Presidents must have obtained some satisfaction from their knowledge that they can, if necessary, access the bank account coordinates of certain of these World Court Judges; and in any case, a clandestine promise of ‘compensation’ will have surely been all that was ‘necessary’.

Manifestly, if the foregoing analysis is inaccurate in any way, shape or form, the World Court can correct any inadvertent errors of analysis on our part at any time.

CANADA SUDDENLY POSTS US$-DENOMINATED BOND SALE
On 31st August, Bloomberg reported that Canada is planning a bond sale denominated not in Canadian dollars but in US dollars – the first such offering for more than a decade – and that the launch ‘may take place in the “near future”’. Canada does not in fact need to offer such bonds to the market, as its finances across the board are in a commendably healthy state; and we suspect that the entire operation will be ‘pulled’ given the ‘unfolding of events’ and this exposure.

But the Canadian Finance Minister, Jim Flaherty, announced the sale on Friday 28th August in a surreptitious manner on the Department’s website, without indicating the volume of such bonds to be sold. According to the website posting, the purpose of the bond is to strengthen the Canadian reserves of foreign exchange and to support lending by the International Monetary Fund. Mr Eric Lascelles, the Chief Economist with TD Securities Inc., Toronto, suggested that Canada’s supply of foreign currency-denominated bonds ‘has generally declined rather sharply over the years…. This is just an opportunity to reverse that trend’.

But it isn’t ‘an opportunity’ at all: it’s a wheeze suddenly posted without warning on the Finance Ministry’s website. Why?

Step forward (metaphorically speaking) William Jefferson Rockefeller-Clinton and George W. Bush Jr., world-class Financial Fraudsters and Experts in Stealing Other People’s Money whose swollen bank accounts have been extensively frozen.

If enough Canadian officials have been bribed, or rather, promised their cut from the intended high-yield, medium-term Canadian notes denominated in US dollar currency and therefore redeemable clandestinely via the Federal Reserve [see below], and given that the Criminal Presidents can only now deal ON the books, why, the answer to their ‘prayers’ will surely be a luscious new portfolio of foreign bonds issued in American currency. Except that this won’t happen!

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES TO KINDLY OBLIGE, AS WELL
And ever so helpfully, just to ‘make a market’, it is reported to us that the United Arab Emirates is now proposing to issue US dollar-denominated bonds, as well. Specifically, the state-controlled Emirates NBD PJSC, the biggest UAE bank by assets, is seeking, Bloomberg also reported on 1st September, to raise more than $500 million in US currency this year by selling medium-term notes with a typical maturity of between three and five years.

In fairness it should be added that Sanjay Uppal, the Chief Financial Officer with the UAE bank, also told Bloomberg that ‘honestly speaking we could go through this year with very little issuance’ on the assumption of a reduction in general nervousness in the financial markets – famous last words, since we are now in the eye of the biggest financial storm in history, courtesy of the Four Criminal Presidents, two of whom flew with indecent haste to Toronto on Saturday 29th August after leaving the Boston Catholic Basilica.

While accordingly hoping to line their own pockets thanks to the ‘good’ and probably corrupt offices of Canadian ‘facilitators’ (the fact that Clinton and G. Bush Jr. arrived in Toronto over a weekend is neither here nor there: that’s when deals are struck at this level of corruption), the Two Corrupt Presidents will also have been keenly aware of the extreme urgency of the situation (so far as their own pockets and persons are concerned). Because, without such a concept to cling to (and it may be aborted following this posting, as has occurred in the past), their already debilitated financial futures would surely be looking as severely constrained as their physical prospects.

For one thing, they wouldn’t be in any position to compete with the London-based on-the-books, fully transparent and taxable Dollar Refunding operation, of which they are insanely jealous and which all concerned in their circles have vainly attempted to thwart.

NEW YORK FED HAS A $500 TRILLION ‘BLACK HOLE’
But secondly, even more to the point, the entire Derivatives Hydrogen Bomb may be about to explode. Specifically:

• The Federal Reserve Bank of New York, primary seat of this Fraudulent Finance, is reported to us to have a BLACK HOLE of $500 TRILLION in off-balance sheet holdings that are not covered by any collateral or assets whatsoever.

This state of affairs arose partly under the stewardship (not) of Timothy Geithner, the current US Treasury Secretary, who uses barracks language when haranguing distinguished female heads of critical financial sector agencies, as previously reported. One can perhaps more easily understand why this man loses his cool: he will be taken down when this collapse ‘blows’.

• It was against this background that Reuters reported from Peking on 31st August that Chinese State-owned corporations will be allowed by the Chinese authorities to ‘walk away’ from any loss-making commodity derivative trades [see above].

Specifically, the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, which is the regulator and nominal shareholder for the Chinese State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), was reported to have informed six foreign banks that the SOEs now reserve the (sovereign) right to default on derivatives contracts. The report was derived from an unnamed Chinese official source cited by Caijing magazine in an article published on 29th August.

MORE BELATED CHINESE MEASURES AGAINST FRAUDULENT FINANCE
The report was qualified by Reuters’ assertions that official confirmation could not be obtained, but a banking source told the news agency that ‘a handful of the State-Owned Enterprises… are being encouraged by regulators to renegotiate. It’s outrageous, but it’s China, so everyone is treading very carefully’ – but not with sufficient care to prevent this report reverberating around the world, as all talk of recovery was suddenly swamped by well-founded gloom on 1st September, when the stock market reflected the mood immediately.

Air China, China Eastern and COSCO (shipping), having incurred colossal derivatives losses since 2008, were reported to have issued almost identical notices to banks.

• SASAC became responsible for overseeing the derivatives trading activities of SOEs from the local securities regulator in February 2009, after several Chinese firms had reported immense losses from playing around with derivatives.

This is the corollary to the new ‘Master Agreement’ régime referenced above, to be introduced by the Chinese authorities effective 16th September.

The Chinese authorities have been seeking since February 2009 to prevent the sale of foreign derivatives ‘products’ to Chinese firms by foreign banks, after certain large Chinese enterprises bought so-called ‘protection’ contracts against higher prices, when of course the derivatives sector imploded following the events of 10th-12th September 2008.

• In July, SASAC ordered all those Central Government-controlled State corporations still unwisely engaged in trading derivatives to file quarterly reports concerning their investments, including, the Reuters report added, details of their holdings and performance.

ORIGINAL THEFT OF DELMARVA TIMBER TRUST ASSETS
The gargantuan BLACK HOLE within the Federal Reserve Bank of New York is a direct and specific consequence of the criminal hypothecation of derivatives based on assets belonging to Delmarva Timber Trust which were stolen by CIA criminal finance operatives under the Clinton Administration with the full knowledge and encouragement of the White House.

• These Delmarva Timber Trust assets, including assets held in Bank Rafidain sub-accounts, were held in London and kept thus as a safekeeping measure to keep the assets away from the clutches of Godfather George H. W. Bush Sr., Rockefeller-Clinton and Leo Wanta.

•THIS is what Paulson, Geithner and Bernanke are COVERING UP.

The accumulation of such a colossal portfolio of dud derivatives assets, arising originally from this CIA-controlled THEFT, and the running of these dollar transactions via the New York Fed, has led directly to the biggest financial crisis in world history – a state of affairs which is exacerbated, ‘as we speak’, by the following further scandalous abomination:

DESPITE THIS CRISIS, BERNANKE WAS BLOCKING THE PAYOUTS
For the past three weeks plus, UP TO OUR CUT-OFF TIME, the Settlements payouts in the United States were BLOCKED, as reported above, by Dr Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, working with the desperate US Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner.

In other words, the CRISIS THAT WAS PRIMED TO BLOW UP was being deliberately triggered and exacerbated by the head of the US Central Bank himself, in order to assist Geithner and Paulson to continue obfuscating the existence of this $500 trillion ‘BLACK HOLE’.

Which, of course, also explains why CIA-‘President’ Obama (10), holidaying on Martha’s vineyard in readiness for the expected ‘Four Presidents and a Funeral’ event, very suddenly interrupted his vacation – having (to our own professional knowledge) previously told the pressmen and women accompanying him, to ‘chill out because there won’t be any news this week’ – and took time out on 25th August to propose that Dr Bernanke should serve a second four-year term as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board.

This announcement could perfectly well have been made later, after Obama’s return to Washington, and in any case was issued way in advance of ‘normal practice’.

CIA-PRESIDENT OBAMA IN SECRET CAHOOTS WITH BERNANKE
What this told us was that, since we know that Bernanke was BLOCKING the payouts, ‘President’ Obama, who was repeatedly reported to us by usually reliable US sources to be ‘anxious for this matter to be finalised once and for all’, was playing a double game – since he had so prematurely reappointed the US central banking official whom he knew to be blocking, and whom he had very probably ‘instructed’ to block, the Settlements payouts in the United States.

• Hence CIA-‘President’ Barack Obama is or has been a co-conspirator with Godfather George H.W. D.V.D. BushSr, Clinton 42, Bush Jr. 43, Hillary Clinton, et al. in holding the whole world to ransom.

POOR BERNANKE A VICTIM OF IDENTITY FRAUD
In a revealing side-show, Agence France-Presse and Newsweek reported on 26th August that poor Federal Reserve Board Chairman Dr Ben Bernanke was one of hundreds of victims of an identity fraud ring that stole over $2.1 million from individuals and financial institutions. Court documents had revealed that a thief stole Dr Bernanke’s wife’s purse in August 2008 and had begun cashing cheques on the Bernanke family’s bank account.

The reports stated that the theft of Dr Bernanke’s cheque book became part of an ongoing, wide-ranging identity-theft investigation mounted by the US Secret Service and the United States Postal Inspection Service, and that the probe led to arrests, criminal complaints and indictments brought by Federal prosecutors in the United States Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria – the famous court which was the scene of the events of 19th October 2007 reported by this service and attended by the Editor.

The Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board permitted himself the privilege of being interviewed by Newsweek, saying that ‘identity theft is a crime that affects millions of Americans every year’.

‘Our family was but one of 500 separate instances traced to one crime ring. I am grateful for the law enforcement officers who patiently and diligently work to solve and prevent these financial crimes’.

Inevitably, the Editor’s sensitive nature compels him to commiserate with Dr and Mrs Bernanke. What a trial this experience must have been for them, poor things.

FED IS (WAS) NO-GO AREA FOR U.S. LAW ENFORCEMENT CADRES
Since, however, the Federal Reserve and the Federal Reserve Interbank Settlement Fund are no-go areas for the law enforcement officers of which Dr Bernanke is so touchingly proud – given that no checks and balances apply in that arena – we can be certain that the Chairman of the US Federal Reserve Board loses no sleep at night, after stroking his beard, over the financial devastation that he inflicts upon the payees of the Settlements monies, including the 330,000 victims of the ruthless Ponzi schemes perpetrated by the crumbling edifice of endless financial corruption constructed by Godfather Bush and his chief technician, Bernanke’s predecessor, Dr Alan Greenspan.

The fact that NONE of the criminals who thought they would be paid, will be receiving a single red cent, according to our latest authoritative information, does not in the slightest compensate for the scandalous fact that the Chairman of the US Federal Reserve Board was himself willfully continuing to block legitimate payouts in collaboration with the US Treasury Secretary.

BARNEY FRANK BELATEDLY CALLS FOR THE FED TO BE AUDITED
Significantly, but far too late to save the situation, Representative Barney Frank has joined Rep. Ron Paul in calling for a comprehensive audit of the Federal Reserve Board – in the context of Bloomberg’s case against the Fed which resulted in a Court victory for the publisher, and that Dr Ben Bernanke, of course, is resisting.

• An audit, which will need to include the Federal Reserve Interbank Settlement Fund. will put an end to the corrupt practices at the Federal Reserve once and for all: so ‘Gatekeeper’ Bernanke’s job is to prevent that happening, while illegally blocking the Settlements payouts at the same time

‘EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION’ OF TOP CRIMINALS REQUIRED
The British Monarchical Power, wielding the Writ of Execution, should instruct the ‘enforcers’ to procure the ‘extraordinary rendition’ of these highest-ranking US financial criminals, including Dr Bernanke himself, to a jurisdiction where the handcuffs that need to be applied to them are not subsequently ordered to be removed by World Court Judge Thomas Buergenthal.

• The report originally intended for posting on 2nd September ends here.

LIBYAN CONTROVERSY IS A U.S. FALSE FLAG OPERATION
The row over the release from Scottish incarceration of the Libyan prisoner (note that we do not describe him as ‘bomber) has been misrepresented on both sides of the Atlantic. In Britain, the ‘mainstream’ media has focused on the ‘humanitarian’ dimension, which has been escalated to ‘pinpoint’ the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, as duplicitous in ‘doing this deal’ behind the backs of ‘our friends the Americans’. In the United States, outlets such as The New York Daily News have all enjoyed themselves throwing bad eggs at the British – with that newspaper declaring on 2nd September that the ‘Special Relationship’ is ‘gone’, under the headline: ‘Brown the Betrayer’.

The yellow New York paper waffled: ‘As for the ‘Special Relationship’ between the US and Britain, the storied alliance built on the resolve of World War II and carried on through Thatcher and Blair, through Iraq and Afghanistan: it is, in a word, gone’.

Now this service has argued that the ‘Special Relationship’ is shattered and should be wound up, but NOT for the spurious reasons put forward by US outlets. On the contrary, our ‘line’ is that we have been deceived and abused for so long by the United States, which has traditionally treated the United Kingdom with cynical disdain, that there is no point in continuing this pretence until such time as the Americans ‘clean up their corrupt act’.

However whereas WE have sound reasons for this argument, the barrage of hatred pouring forth from the United States following the release of the Libyan intelligence operative is based upon the very kind of duplicitous behaviour of which WE complain, and of which the US outlets themselves are complaining in the context of the release of Abdel-baset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi from jail in Scotland (11) in a disgusting ourbreak of ‘Black-calling the Kettle Pot-ism’.

DAVID RIFKIN, A U.S. SCUMBAG, LECTURES US ON THE BBC
In this connection, one of the more loathsome US operatives who stuck his oar in, appearing on the air to castigate the British over this affair, was David Rifkin, a former US Justice Department official who ‘served’ under Reagan and George W. Bush. This impertinent US operative surfaced on the BBC’s ‘World at One’ radio programme on 2nd September to inform us as follows:

‘This is the kind of duplicitous behaviour that most people here do not expect from Britain. I really can’t think about a more duplicitous act by Britain vis-à-vis the United States in the postwar period’.

Note that Mr David Rifkin stated that such behaviour was not to be expected from Great Britain – whereas (unstated) it is standard behaviour from the United States, given the hegemony of the criminalised Intelligence Power, as Mr Rifkin knows perfectly well. While his wife served on the Federal Reserve Board, David Rifkin, described to us by US sources as ‘a scumbag’, exploited his wife’s position by engaging in all sorts of off-balance sheet deals in which he should not have been engaged. He is a spokesman for the de facto Financial Terrorist group within the structures, a fact of which the naïve ‘World at One’ BBC presenters would have been wholly ignorant. Lectures from this US scumbag are accordingly themselves doubly duplicitous and therefore contemptible.

THE CHENEY OIL OPERATION IN LIBYA
Two especially notorious US intelligence operatives named Christiansen and Brock, in partnership with the criminal operative Richard B. Cheney, did a clandestine deal with the terrorist Government of Colonel Qadhafi, and developed a Libyan oilfield. After President R. Reagan’s bombing of Libya (using British airfields without our permission for the purpose, of course), these nasty operatives returned to Libya, where they resumed operations.

Given that British Petroleum (BP) has its largest operation in Libya, this contrived furore over the ‘Lockerbie bomber’ clearly has NOTHING to do with the sensitivities of the bereaved families, or concerning where al-Meghrahi was to die, about which these hardened criminals couldn’t care less – and everything to do with a carefully pre-planned ‘Blowback’ operation designed to discredit the British Government by exploiting the fissiparous inclinations of the Scottish Nationalist minority government in Edinburgh, consequent upon the following development.

BRITISH SIMPLY TOOK A LEAF OUT OF THE U.S. BOOK
It is perfectly clear that the British took a leaf out of the US Intelligence Power’s ‘grabitisation’ book. What happened, in essence, was that a very long-range British intelligence operation was developed for the purpose of ‘locking’ the ‘Lockerbie’ scandal into place in the British national interest (even though supposedly no European Union country has any national interests as they have largely been collectivised under the European Union arrangements: this example shows how false that ‘settlement’ is in practice).

Participants in this operation included the ‘cream’ of British ‘hard men’, all of whom could easily give their odious American intelligence rivals a run for their money. These figures included Sir John Bond, Chairman of HSBC; Lord Foster, the ‘international’ British architect; Lord Guthrie, the former head of the British military; Lord Bell, the Lady Thatcher’s original PR man, now a publicity tycoon; Prime Minister Tony Blair; Lord Browne, ex-Chief Executive Office, British Petroleum; Lord (Jacob) Rothschild; Jacob’s son, Nathaniel Rothschild; Peter Munk, a billionaire operative; Peter Mandelson, the high-ranking Business Secretary ‘handler’ of Gordon Brown; and, on the Libyan side, Colonel Muammar Qadhafi and his son, Saif al-Islam Qadhafi, whom the Rothschilds have carefully cultivated and befriended over a long period.

CHENEY TRYING TO DESTROY U.S.-UK COOPERATION
The correct way to look at the Libyan sequence, therefore, is to recognise that the contrived row over the ‘Special Relationship’ reflects a US Blowback operation orchestrated by a highest-level US criminal intelligence agent called Richard B. Cheney. Furthermore, this operation fits perfectly with the ongoing deception activities of the US Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner, a scoundrel whose days in power (we predict) may be numbered by the ‘unfolding of events’, who is focused on replacing European representation on the Board of the over-compliant, US-controlled International Monetary Fund by procuring a reduction of seats on the Board from 24 to 20 by 2012, with the large developing countries that already have chairs retaining them. The object of this exercise is to kick the British (and possibly the French) off the Board, so that it can then be packed with more corrupt Directors from emerging countries upon whose support the desperate, corrupt elements headed by Geithner within the US Treasury depend for re-starting the collapsed derivatives trading sector.

THE UNANSWERED AFGHANISTAN QUESTION GETS NASTIER
The refusal of the British Ministry of Defence to answer the Editor’s question ‘what are we doing in Afghanistan’ – with its repeated corollary that in the absence of any coherent official answer, the Editor would have to advise readers that Great Britain is supporting a subversive US operation to acquire control over the heroin trade – is now destabilising the British Government itself.

Specifically, Eric Joyce MP, a former British Army Major and the Parliamentary Private Secretary to the Defence Secretary, Mr Robert Ainsworth, resigned on 3rd September, presenting the UK Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, with a sharp rebuff for the Government’s failure to explain to the British people why our troops are being killed in large numbers in an Afghanistan war the true rationale of which has never been explained to the British people.

This MP for Falkirk West stated pointedly in his resignation letter: “I do not think the [British] public will accept for much longer that our losses can be justified simply by referring to the risk of greater terrorism”. Dismissing this outburst as the opinion of ‘a junior parliamentary aide’, the previously almost unheard-of Mr Ainsworth failed to answer our question, or any one else’s – leaving the issue up in the air, and therefore ripe for further elaboration by this service.

To begin with, unconfirmed reports from within British military circles suggest that, despite early indications that British troops are soon to be withdrawn from Afghanistan (believed to arise due to the ‘unfolding of events’), contingency plans ALSO exist for as many as 32,000 British troops (thirty-two thousand) to be deployed there. This madness is accompanied by Mr Joyce’s further comment in his resignation letter to the following effect: ‘Britain fights; Germany pays; France calculates; and Italy avoids’, in the Afghan context. More to the point, Germany has a military force of 340,000 under arms, with a further 50,000 armed reservists, 1,000 tanks in pristine condition ready to roll and, according to information ‘special’ to this service, surreptitious nuclear weapons.

• By contrast, the British military is bleeding to death, resources are being poured down the ghastly Afghan drain to support the corrupt American grab of the heroin trade, and our aircraft carrier projects have been indefinitely postponed or cancelled in part because the UK military’s resources and services are being deliberately diverted and abused.

And why are they abused? Let’s get to the nub of this issue:

• Britain’s military forces, the best in the world, have been subverted. Specifically, they are not deployed in the national interest (given that European Union ‘Member States’ have no national interest since they have mostly been collectivised, unless we are talking about Germany and France in which case collectivisation is for the rest of the EU and not for them).

• On the contrary, our military is routinely deployed in the ‘international interest’, namely in support of an internationalist agenda, which in reality means the agenda of the criminalist internationalists.

• This reality CANNOT BE EXPLAINED TO THE BRITISH PEOPLE because they don’t know about this subversive agenda (although a huge percentage almost certainly suspects it), and because they overwhelmingly support the continued unity and sovereignty of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

• Therefore, the UK Ministry of Defence is, in collaboration with the UK Government as a whole, engaged in a gross deception of the British people – one consequence of which includes the fact that hundreds of our finest young men are being slaughtered in a war which, contrary to vague official assurances, does not serve British interests at all.

• In fact the reverse is the case: precisely because the Ministry of Defence provides its military resources in support of internationalist (i.e. FOREIGN) interests, which they are precluded from revealing because they cannot divulge the truth to the British people, the MOD is actually engaged not only in deceiving and defrauding the British population, but in renting out its military power to the enemies of the United Kingdom.

The sooner such straightforward, basic truths start to sink into the thick skulls of brainwashed UK apparatchiks, policymakers, the political Establishment and officialdom, the better.

INSPIRING EXAMPLE SET BY THE MAYOR OF DONCASTER
They could do well to consider the behaviour of a newly elected Mayor of Doncaster, a northern British town. Announcing that he considers that his task is to reduce the costs of bureaucracy and thus the burden on the people he was elected to serve, this man has indicated that he will use his newly conferred popular power as follows:

• His first action was to reduce his own salary from £75,000 to £30,000, saving taxpayers £45,000.

• He immediately reduced the huge number of Council members to a dozen, saving the city an estimated £800,000 per annum.

• He has already blocked the funding of a ‘gay pride march’.

• He will block the funding of all superfluous and subversive ‘Common-Purpose’-influenced activities which have nothing to do with the purposes of municipal government.

• He has informed all holders of ‘non-jobs’ within the municipal bureaucracy that they had better start looking for a real job outside local government, because their non-jobs will be terminated.

• On the basis of the immediate savings he has ordered, he has announced that the Council Tax bills for local people will be reduced initially by 3%.

• He has reiterated that he was elected to serve the people of Doncaster, that he places their interests above all others, and that he will oppose, refuse and terminate all activities and expenses which contravene that purpose.

BRITISH MINISTRY OF DEFENCE IS BETRAYING THE PEOPLE
The British Ministry of Defence has sold its soul to corrupt interests which contravene those of the British people. It should come clean with the people, starting with Afghanistan. If It can’t persuade its brainwashed Government bosses to come to their senses, it should take matters into its own hands and issue a ‘Mission Statement’ indicating that it serves the interests of the British people exclusively and that it will ensure in the future that this objective is rigidly adhered to.

Of course this isn’t going to happen, is it. Well, they said that before we started this operation to eliminate the scourge of the criminalist financiers and of their Fraudulent Finance.

A GLIMPSE OF REVOLUTIONARY REALITY IN THE BURMA CONTEXT
Referencing our previous coverage of the ‘rescue’ of an American from Burma (a.k.a. Myanmar) by Senator Jim Webb, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, we have been informed that the rescuee was seen making a satanic salute during his transfer from Burma in the sequence described, to the United States.

This reinforces our perception that Burma is intended to be ‘unlocked’, no doubt as the Afghan situation goes from bad to worse, in the interests of the drug operations conducted by the CIA and the corrupt US military which, like the Agency, is engaged in drug-trafficking.

The ‘Burma Play’ has next to NOTHING to do with ‘establishing democracy’ and with the fate of the Burmese ‘democracy icon’, Aung San Suu Kyi – but EVERYTHING to do with validating an option to ‘unlock’ Burma in the interests of (drug-trafficking) strategy. No doubt Webb, described as ‘a gruff Vietnam veteran’, is himself a ‘Useful Idiot’ who may not understand what he is doing.

In all likelihood, the American ‘rescued’ by Senator Webb was a CIA operative or agent fulfilling instructions to prepare the ground for this ‘Burma Play’ operation, which would explain his satanic salute. In case this mystifies some people, it is a characteristic of these Workers of Darkness that they cannot contain within themselves what they are up to, often resorting to gestures – like the satanic salutes perpetrated by former President Bush Jr., and Laura Bush at the 2004 Inaugural Ball, or the same gestures by many other key operatives, including the Iranian President Ahmad Inejad (Mr Dinner Jacket) – to release their tensions.

• We liken such behaviour to the spooky gargoyles stuck up on European masonic cathedrals, many of which stick their tongues out at passers-by below.

BUSH PUSHED WAY BEYOND CO-CONSPIRATORS’ TOLERANCE
In taking stock of the ongoing and immediate ‘unfolding of events’, we may observe as follows:

• The head of the serpent, George H. W. D. V. D. Bush Sr., being of dual German and US nationality and of Germanic extraction, has, as we predicted, exhibited the cardinal weakness of all German schemers and conspirators. He has simply pushed matters so far beyond the toleration snapping-point even of his own most obliging criminalist associates in the trading, financial, official and organised crime sectors at home and abroad, that he has destroyed and forfeited their bought and blackmailed ‘loyalty’ to him and everything he stands for.

Hitler made the same mistake: he went too far and lost his essential support and underpinning, as a result. This is in fact a standard German trait, born of pride and arrogance, and one which profilers, had any with integrity existed within the structures, could have identified as soon as the scales ever started to fall from their eyes as a consequence of these exposures.

• ‘All things considered’, we should actually ‘be grateful for’ the fact that this serpent has shown himself to be true to this fateful weakness. The reason for this is as follows. By pushing bovine intransigence to such extremes, thereby alienating not only the corrupt collaborators at home and abroad without whose cooperation his criminal cartel operation cannot function, but everyone else who matters as well, he has unwittingly ensured that the FINAL OUTCOME will be seen to be MORE SATISFACTORY than would have been the case if some kind of sordid, dirty compromise had been agreed earlier in the process (which was actually impossible: see below).

• BECAUSE: The serpent’s intransigence has made it inevitable that the entire global portfolio of fraudulent off-balance sheet derivative ‘assets’ would indeed be shown and finally recognised to be worth ZERO – and that this evolved outcome would, by process of the disgust and exhaustion attributable exclusively to this serpent’s obtuse misplaced cunning and stupidity in spinning his resistance out for so long, come (much faster than anyone may have anticipated) to be accepted without question everywhere. Had some kind of compromise been reached with the weaker and now decapitated cabal and its criminalised intelligence sector hangers-on earlier, such a decisive outcome would not have been possible, and the world would have limped towards an even ghastlier catastrophe, if that can be imagined.

• Therefore, hideous, exhausting, infuriating, maddening, destructive and destabilising although this horrible experience has been for ALL concerned, that is the prohibitive price that has been and is being paid for REAL reform and fumigation.

• We expect the pace of arrests, indictments, imprisonments and ‘other measures’ to accelerate as the resistance crumbles with the COLLAPSE of the crime syndicate and its associates – beginning in the United States and spreading rapidly throughout the world.

SATAN WAS NOT CALLED THE SERPENT FOR NOTHING
In this connection, the being to which we are introduced at the beginning of Genesis, after Adam and Eve, is the underworld creature called THE SERPENT. The choice of this metaphor to signify TOTAL EVIL, was NOT ACCIDENTAL. Think about it. What does a serpent DO? It slithers around. Can it move in a straight line? Can it be relied upon for any purpose? The answer is NO.

The reason that this financial crisis may now at last be on the verge of resolution (on the basis of intelligence to hand, and assuming no or few further serpentine slithers) is that all who have stood up to and resisted the wiles of the serpent are CRUSHING THE SERPENT’S HEAD. Once the head of the serpent has been bruised, as the Bible puts it, the serpent cannot slither any longer.

What has the Bush-Clinton-CIA-DVD criminal syndicate been doing in response to the repeated initiatives taken against it by those who have finally resolved to fight for the restoration of the Rule of Law (leaving aside the reality that the corrupted US legal system needs to be purged as a matter of urgency, as well)?

Every time some kind of ‘accord’ or undertaking has been reached, the serpent has predictably reneged on its undertakings – that is to say, the snake has slithered back into the undergrowth.

• Irrespective of the details of each successive phase, this is the essence of what has been happening. The serpent has repeatedly slithered into the undergrowth instead of fulfilling its promises, which have invariably turned out to be worthless.

We have, in fact, been living through an enactment of what we are taught at the beginning of the book of Genesis, BUT WHICH MOST OF US NEVER UNDERSTOOD. We have witnessed THE ESSENCE OF EVIL, and how it operates. Those who have tried to reach accommodations with the serpent and his sub-serpents, have been deceived on every occasion.

THE SERPENT IS A DISCIPLE OF LENIN [or rather, vice versa]
Well, of course. One cannot ever reach accommodation with a serpent. It was ‘not by accident’ that Lenin, one of the 20th century’s most conspicuous incarnations of the serpent, taught his followers that ALL agreements made with ‘the bourgeoisie’ can be reneged upon whenever ‘the correlation of forces’ favours ‘the Revolution’ (which itself means ‘slithering round and round in circles’). The US revolutionary criminals at the highest level operate on precisely the same criteria: as the Editor of Soviet Analyst, this Editor can state with authority that we have observed the criminal operatives at the highest levels of the US official structures following Leninist methodology, including dialectical behaviour, TO THE LETTER.

These American and collaborating foreign operative-office-holders are disciples of Lenin. At the relevant levels, covert and overt Soviet (‘International Socialist’) and German (‘National Socialist’) long-range intelligence structures work closely together, as has been the case since long before the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. The collapse of that accord made no difference over the longer term, (and even among Hitler’s own Nazi intelligentsia, at the time): because it represented just another dialectical ‘switch’ – yet another ‘bait and switch’ operation.

TAKEN BY SURPRISE, THE SERPENT COULDN’T ORGANISE ITS OWN DEFENCE
So: we have been wrestling with the serpent and observing closely how he operates.

• Furthermore, in bruising the serpent’s head, all of us who have stood up against this ruthless and relentless evil, have demonstrated the indisputable fact that when faced with real opposition, the snakes were so taken by surprise that they couldn’t organise any defence.

• They slithered into the undergrowth instead.

Belatedly, they have, it is true, orchestrated ‘stings’ and scamming operations against some of us (including a CIA operation to proliferate the theft of the rights and copyright in our books to try to entice us into financially destructive litigation, which will be exposed in detail soon); but because they were so staggered that there was any opposition at all, they were taken by surprise and failed to organise in retaliation. They have been kept on the wrong foot ever since.

NO ‘GUTS’ ARE NEEDED! JUST DO IT!!
It may be recalled that a commentator, Mark Huber, reported as follows on another website, on 12th June 2008, concerning some of these exposures:

“Chris Story’s facts are understated. This is much bigger than he knows or is willing to state… so far. He is the only investigator who has had the guts to print the results of his research. It is causing unbelievable turmoil in criminal, financial and political circles, long accustomed to conducting their nefarious actions beneath the radar of the public, and honest media”.

But actually NO GUTS ARE REALLY NEEDED. The secret is: JUST DO IT!!! When you have ‘done it’ they are ALREADY on the back foot. Just as the blackmailer is actually in a weaker position than the blackmailee (who can defang the blackmailer permanently by allowing the blackmailer’s report to be acknowledged), so are these snakes PERMANENTLY disadvantaged when their criminal behaviour has been, and continues to be exposed. THEY CANNOT RECOVER FROM GENUINE EXPOSURE!

Think about it. If the allegations are true, they can’t deny them. When we have stated that Citibank is a criminal enterprise, nothing happens. Why is that? BECAUSE IT’S TRUE. And any perusal of the cases involving money center banks in the United States Court for the Southern District of New York, in Downtown Manhattan, for instance, will reveal that innumerable other colossal institutions which we could name, are criminal enterprises, as well.

WHEN WE STAND UP TO THEM, THEY ‘FALL BACK TO THE GROUND’
From which it may be deduced that when we stand up to these criminals, they are so staggered that ANYONE has had the effrontery to DARE to contradict them, which has never taken place before, that they become mired in confusion. This confusion becomes all the more agonising and acute for them because the serpent’s arrogance, given that he has perpetrated these huge crimes without opposition for so long, has blinded him and his fellow demons to the reality that the opposition is no flash in the pan, but is – let’s boldly acknowledge the fact – supported and ordained by the Divine Providence. The credit belongs NOT to any one of us, but exclusively to The Lord.

• In this context, if you search the scriptures, you will find that the demons are NOT atheists. They KNOW about the Lord, and are TERRIFIED (12).

Those who cannot bring themselves to believe this, or to believe at all, would nevertheless do well to contemplate, in this context, the following verses from the Gospel of John that we have often highlighted before:

‘Jesus therefore, knowing all things that should come upon him, went forth, and said unto them, Whom seek ye?’

‘They answered him, Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus saith unto them, I am he. And Judas also, which betrayed him, stood with them’.

“As soon then as he had said unto them, I am he, they went backward, and fell to the ground’. [John, Chapter 18, verses 4-6].

He withstood them, and they went backwards, and fell to the ground. That is what happens when we resolutely, and with steely determination, and knowing by Whom we are supported, stand up to the serpent and his disciples.

Notes and References:

1. ‘Bravo to Christopher Story. His answer is so appropriate and eloquent. This shows once again, what a “class act” this talented man is! In such a critical time, it is without question appropriate to use best judgment and to act as prudently as possible. Waiting a few extra days is not going to be the end of the world. Some people lose perspective of the enormous scope of what’s coming’.

In the event, as indicated in the main text, we have been specifically informed that the two main consequences associated with our delay in publishing that are noted, arose because, after turning down the extraordinary 2% (or 2.5%) cut offer (as described later in this report), Bush’s duplicity was FINALLY comprehended by certain cadres who ought to have known much better years earlier.

2. Uttering threats is a Federal offence no matter how the threat is uttered; but in the present context it is understood that Bush Sr. has been uttering threats of physical retribution over the phone. [In a much earlier commentary, we may have suggested that the utterance of threats, which is a criminal offence in the United Kingdom, may not have the same ‘standing’ in the United States. We elaborated this in the context of the numerous threats received by the Editor of this service (now up to 28, by the way, of which six have been explicit death threats, and excluding the ‘Triple Gunshot Voicemail’ episode that followed the ‘lockdown’ of the $14+ trillion achieved on 10-12th September 2008 as a direct consequence of our intervention).

• We stand corrected and now confirm what we should have known earlier, that the utterance of threats in the United States is a Federal offence.

3. Email received by the Editor from a high-level payee at 6:01pm on Thursday 3rd September 2009.

4. The Wall Street Journal, 3 September 2009, International Finance section, page C2, ‘Foreign banks caught in a bind’, report from Shanghai by Denis McMahon.

5. “Europe has mapped its monetary exit’, Jean-Claude Trichet, President, European Central Bank, the Financial Times, London, 3rd September 2009.,

6. ‘Derivatives users warn on OTC regulation’, The Financial Times, 2 September 2009.

7. The Daily Telegraph, Business section, 4th September 2009, page 1, ‘Moulton quits Alchemy over strategy’. The insider added: ‘Many of Alchemy’s investors have been with Jon [Moulton] for a long time. He has made them a lot of money and they put their money to work based on him’.

• These savvy investors, noting that one of the very top UK hedge fund operators is getting out of the business NOW, will most certainly take the hint and grasp the opportunity (IF IT STILL REMAINS) presented by the associated variation of the ‘key man’ clause, to remove their funds from Alchemy before it collapses. This is proxy for the ENTIRE derivatives sector, as it unwinds, because off-balance sheet funds WILL be worth zero, whatever Geithner, the industry lobbying organisations and the Financial Times may propagandise to the contrary. Money is being rapidly removed from these entities whenever possible.

8. It was Lenin who used the phrase ‘the unfolding of events’ to describe or hint at a cascading sequence of developments destined to swamp and smother all attempts to resist it. As noted elsewhere in this report (and also earlier), US holders of high office and routine CIA behaviour demonstrate by their slimy words and unreliable undertakings that they are de facto disciples of Lenin – in many respects, more skilled and devious than their Soviet counterparts.

9. ‘Financial stability depends on more capital’, by Timothy Geithner, US Treasury Secretary (for the time being), The Financial Times, 3 September 2009.

10. Concerning CIA-‘President’ Obama, we have been remiss of late in failing to post a reminder that on 14th June 2008, the well-regarded News Host Tim Russert died suddenly of a ‘heart attack’ aged 58, almost immediately after concluding an interview with Barack Hussein Obama. It will be recalled that the Bush Godfather appeared at the funeral.

11. The matter of the involvement of the Scottish Nationalist minority Government is a separate issue here, and is excluded from this analysis. However the incident has unveiled the fact that this Scottish devolved government, established under Blair’s devolution project in 1999, is behaving as though Scotland is a sovereign power in its own right – pursuing ‘trade’ agreements with countries such as Qatar, representing itself in Brussels, and otherwise conducting itself in precise conformity with one of Lenin’s more obscure dicta: ‘separation precedes federation’ (although the Scottish nationalists will have a problem with the ‘federation’ bit.

[This subject requires a separate presentation].

12. ‘Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe and tremble’, James (the brother of Jesus), Chapter 2, verse 19.

• COPYRIGHT NOTICE: The Editor and his companies have taken measures to obtain protection and recompense for the gross breaches of the copyright material, books and works owned by this service, our companies, the Editor and Author, and the Authors whose interests we must protect. In the first place, a pirate platform service in the United States has received a demand for a very large sum of money to compensate us for the wanton stealing of three of our books, the consequence of which barbaric acts has been effectively to destroy our book publishing business. Secondly, the agents for the Google Settlement have been specifically informed by registered mail that we have written, also by registered mail, to the four universities and one public library who have entered into an agreement with Google under the so-called ‘Google Settlement’.

The universities in question are: Oxford, Stanford, Harvard and Michigan; and the public library is the New York Public Library. Our three companies have opted out of the Google Settlement, which is anyway now in some disarray.

These and related parties have been advised that if ANY of our works, published by all three of our companies, not just the intelligence books company which has already been severely ransacked, are assaulted by copyright pirates, we will take all legal measures open to us to enforce our rights and those of our authors. The rationale underlying this scourge is the false and spurious one that the intellectual property of the whole of humanity is the property of the ‘global commons’: a dirty, revolutionary piece of hypocrisy and subversion, the underlying purpose of which is to destroy small publishers so that there will be no dissenting voices to The New Underworld Order.

When time permits, we will be providing ‘further and better particulars’ concerning this outrageous revolutionary development. In the meantime, those amoral persons and parties who have so far downloaded our works are hereby warned that every single download will be traced, and that they risk being pursued for very large damages for gross and insolent breaches of our copyright.

Anyone wishing to reproduce the important anti-World Revolution article posted here must contact the Editor for written permission, on the understanding that a precise form of words that we will specify must accompany any reposting and that the entire article, with credits, must be displayed. Any deviation will be treated as a breach of copyright and dealt with accordingly [see above].

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

ANATOMY OF THE GLOBAL CRIMINAL FINANCE CATASTROPHE

chrisstory

TRAIN WRECK UPON TRAIN WRECK UPON TRAIN WRECK

Tuesday 28 July 2009 04:00

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

CALLING EVIL GOOD, AND GOOD EVIL
‘Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!’

‘Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!’
Isaiah, Chapter 5, verses 20-21.

‘WE’LL KNOW OUR DISINFORMATION PROGRAM IS COMPLETE WHEN EVERYTHING THE AMERICAN PUBLIC BELIEVES IS FALSE’: William Casey, Director of Central Intelligence: An observation by the late Director at his first staff meeting in 1981. This observation reveals the mentality of cynicism which infests the US Federal control structures, and the reality that these structures regard the American people with total contempt. This attitude is the opposite to the noble concept of service to the American people which ought to inspire holders of public office, and therefore represents the epitome of decadence.

The evil spirit directing William Casey got the better of him when he committed suicide in hospital some years later, ostensibly to ‘protect the President’. The fantastic verbal fantasies perpetrated on certain US websites that are operating on the basis of Mr Casey’s principle, enunciated above, should therefore be handled with extreme care. Casey warned you!

‘NONE OF THIS MUST EVER COME OUT’
‘None of this must ever come out, you understand’.
Well, it has. What did she expect?
Gwendolyn Waymark, a Bush Sr. operative, in a voicemail to the Editor in May 2003.

• HISTORICAL GENESIS OF THIS CRIMINAL FINANCE CRISIS

• U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL : A LENINIST STRUCTURE

• U.S. POWER MODEL IS ‘PURER’ THAN THE SOVIET MODEL

• PROOF THAT THE CIA AND THE MAFIA WORK TOGETHER

• THE DURKHEIM PARADIGM: ‘ANOMIE’, ‘NORMLESSNESS’

• COMPROMISED U.S. LAW ENFORCEMENT TRIES AGAIN

• DISSECTING ELEMENTS OF THE CONTROL MECHANISM

• ‘THEY CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO GET AWAY WITH IT’

• NSC-68 AUTHORISED OPERATIONS ‘BY ALL MEANS’

• FURTHER LEGITIMISATION OF OFFICIAL CRIMINALITY

• CRUCIAL NATIONAL SECURITY DECISION DIRECTIVES

• SIX EXTERNAL OBJECTIVES IDENTIFIED UNDER REAGAN

• GOLITSYN’S ‘ONE STEP FORWARD, TWO STEPS BACK’ WARNINGS IGNORED

• THE SOVIET RESPONSE TO THE REAGAN OFFENSIVE

• RUSSIAN WARNING ABOUT A WAVE OF CRIMINALS

• WHY THE SOVIETS HAD FAITH IN THEIR LENINIST PRESCRIPTION

• THE BUSH-CIA-DVD CRIME SYNDICATE MOVES INTO ACTION

• UPDATED ANALYSIS JUDGED TO BE ACCURATE

• THE ‘SORCERER’S APPRENTICE SYNDROME’

• WANTA REMOVED FROM ACCESS TO THE ACCOUNTS BY BUSH-CLINTON

• ‘UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES’ COVER FOR CHAOTIC OUTCOMES

• OBAMA’S HIDEOUS HEALTH CARE LEGISLATION:
THE GOVERNMENT WILL APPEAR AT YOUR DEATHBED

• THE DEVASTATING TESTIMONY OF NEIL BAROFSKY

• DEADLY CONSEQUENCE OF HANDING UNLIMITED POWERS TO PAULSON

• RECKLESS DISPLAY OF IRRESPONSIBLE TREASURY STEWARDSHIP

• ESSENCE OF THE ‘WITHOUT RECOURSE’ FRAUD

• NEW JERSEY COURT DECISION AGAINST DEUTSCHE BANK

• NEW YORK COURT RULING AGAINST DEUTSCHE BANK

• U.S. COURTS ARE KNOCKING THE FALSE BOTTOM OUT OF DERIVATIVES

• BAROFSKY CITES ‘CONFLICTS OF INTEREST’ AND ‘COLLUSION’

• TREASURY TRIES TO BURY BAROFSKY’S DEVASTATING REPORT

• BERNANKE CONDEMNS HIMSELF AND HIS STEWARDSHIP

• FED CHAIRMAN HINTS AT YET MORE GUARANTEES – FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

• $60 TRILLION ON THE BASIS OF THESE NUMBERS ALONE, AND COUNTING

• BERNANKE’S NUMBERS RUBBISH THE OMB DATA

• OFFICIALS PLAY FAST AND LOOSE WITH EACH OTHER’S NUMBERS

• THE QUEEN’S POINTED QUESTION AT THE L.S.E.

• LETTER TO THE QUEEN EXAMINED BY THE BRITISH ACADEMY

• QUEEN MISINFORMED BY THESE NOTED ‘EXPERTS’

• IRAQI LEADER’S SECRET VISIT TO THE WHITE HOUSE

• HOMELAND SECURITY DOCUMENT TO BE SIGNED

• INCREASINGLY HYPER WHITE HOUSE BEHAVIOUR AHEAD OF HIGH-LEVEL CHINESE VISIT

• HIDDEN CRISIS FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION, TOO

• GERMAN COURT’S RULING ON THE LISBON TREATY

• DR HANS TIETMEYER: THE E.U.’S GORBACHEV

• ‘BULLETS WILL FLY AFTER 19TH JULY’: UPDATE

• And finally:
• WHAT ARE WE DOING IN AFGHANISTAN? OUR QUESTION IS NOW THE #1 UK PUBLIC ISSUE

• INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW: Volume 34, Numbers 3 & 4: Comprehensive coverage of the twists and turns of this crisis between September 2008 and June 2009, containing details of many of the astonishing goings-on in the lawless space called the intergovernmental sector.

• In this ‘Black’ arena, ‘anything goes’, assets of other parties are stolen and traded, deception is standard practice, and everyone lies to everyone else. This huge issue, currently ‘on machine’,
provides a devastating record and critique of the deplorable behaviour of the Big Powers, as they fight over stolen money. Please apply via the CONTACT US facility for availability and price details.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice are comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor’s study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing global financial corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Just press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

• The Editor’s $35,000 Wanta bail-out money has been stolen.

• See the second white panel for details of our latest distributed intelligence publications.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

• COPYRIGHT NOTICE: The Editor and his companies have taken measures to obtain protection and recompense for the gross breaches of copyright material, books and works owned by this service, our companies, the Editor and Author, and the Authors whose interests we must protect. In the first place, a pirate platform service in the United States has received a demand for a very large sum of money to compensate us for the wanton stealing of three of our books, the consequence of which barbaric acts has been effectively to destroy our book publishing business. Secondly, the agents for the Google Settlement have been specifically informed by registered mail that we have written, also by registered mail, to the four universities and one public library who have entered into an agreement with Google under the so-called ‘Google Settlement’.

The universities in question are: Oxford, Stanford, Harvard and Michigan; and the public library is the New York Public Library. Our three companies have opted out of the Google Settlement, which is anyway now in some disarray.

These and related parties have been advised that if ANY of our works, published by all three of our companies, not just the intelligence books company which has already been severely ransacked, are assaulted by copyright pirates, we will take all legal measures open to us to enforce our rights and those of our authors. The rationale underlying this scourge is the false and spurious one that the intellectual property of the whole of humanity is the property of the ‘global commons’: a dirty, revolutionary piece of hypocrisy and subversion, the underlying purpose of which is to destroy small publishers so that there will be no dissenting voices to The New Underworld Order.

When time permits, we will be providing ‘further and better particulars’ concerning this outrageous revolutionary development. In the meantime, those amoral persons and parties who have so far downloaded our works are hereby warned that every single download will be traced, and that they risk being pursued for very large damages for gross and insolent breaches of our copyright.

Anyone wishing to reproduce the important anti-World Revolution article posted here must contact the Editor for written permission, on the understanding that a precise form of words that we will specify must accompany any reposting and that the entire article, with credits, must be displayed. Any deviation will be treated as a breach of copyright and dealt with accordingly [see above].

• ROGUE’S GALLERY OF DECEIVERS: Given the deceit and abuse that has been meted out to the Editor of this service since we began these investigations in 2002, the Editor plans to expose, by name, each of the primary perpetrators of deception against us, including a UK-based deceiver recently unmasked who sought to extort money for delivering sensitive packages that he never delivered. This character has been reported to the Police, and a Major Crime Book Number will be sought with a request for an investigation. The relevant documents have been sent by registered and signed-for mail, to the Special Branch officer concerned. Those who have deceived us will be made to endure the grave consequences of their serial duplicity, starting with Leo Wanta, to whom the Editor lent $35,000 to pay for his release from irregular probation, which should have been paid back on 11th June 2007 but concerning which nothing has been heard. All other collaborators and operatives who tried to deceive us at various stages will also be exposed for their deception.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and our ‘politically incorrect’ intelligence books online from this website.

The Editor is indebted to Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., for permission to quote from and elaborate on his work ‘Elite Power and Capital Markets’. This is a thesis submitted in 2002 in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science, Administration of Justice Department, Mercyhurst College. As soon as we have procured the total cessation of the stealing of our books by American copyright pirates (an operation which is ongoing ‘as we speak’), it is intended that Edward Harle Limited will publish this important work for which we hold the world rights.

• NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

HISTORICAL GENESIS OF THE CRIMINAL FINANCE CRISIS
The wall-to-wall official corruption exposed via this website and in our financial publications International Currency Review and Economic Intelligence Review, and which continues as though there had been no discontinuity in September 2008, has its origins in devilishly pragmatic decisions taken under the Truman and Eisenhower Administrations – although the criminal propensities of the ad-hoc, opportunistic power élite can be traced back to ancient times.

For the purposes of contemporary analysis, the genesis of the prevailing unprecedented crisis can be traced not just to the signing into law by President Truman on 26th July 1947 of the US National Security Act of 1947, but also to the clandestine establishment on 4th November 1952 by the secret signature of President Truman of the National Security Agency (NSA).

Unlike the Central Intelligence Agency established under the 1947 legislation, which, it was tacitly understood, would confine its operations to outside the continental United States, the activities of the NSA were not to be constrained geographically. Moreover the NSA came to possess the world’s largest computer bank – which it operated for more than two decades before the world started to catch up and computers became standard communications equipment.

The worldwide counterintelligence crusade against Communism for which, ostensibly, the CIA was established, was galvanized on 7th April 1950 when President Harry Truman promulgated NSC-68 (National Security Council ‘Decree’ Number 68), which promoted ‘a bold and massive program of rebuilding the West’s defensive potential to surpass that of the Soviet world, and of meeting each fresh challenge promptly and unequivocally’ (1).

U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL : A LENINIST STRUCTURE
Before we go any further, the de facto status of the National Security Council (NSC) should be identified. This entity, controlled traditionally by the Vice President of the United States, effectively ‘sits above’ the entire Government of the United States and is in reality ‘superior’ to the Presidency itself. However for public consumption purposes, it appears to be subordinate to the White House.

In this respect, there is no difference whatsoever between the status of the US National Security Council and that of the comparable Security Council which, for instance, functioned ‘above’ the Government in Communist Czechoslovakia, of which the late defector Jan Sejna was Secretary, and President Gorbachëv’s so-called ‘Presidential Council’ which likewise ‘sat above’ the Soviet Government. In contemporary Iran, a similar arrangement prevails, in the format of the Council of Guardians, which effectively issues ‘guideline’ instructions to the Government.

The model is quintessentially Leninist – which should come as no surprise, since the more we study how the US structures really operate, the more closely they come to resemble the classic Leninist power model, as has been partially explained in some of these reports. For instance, in both the United States and the covert Soviet Union, the power triangle is identical – consisting, on the left flank, of the all-powerful Intelligence Power, complemented on the right flank by the brutal Military Power – both of which stand over the Party Power.

Although under overt Soviet Communism, the Party more or less dispensed with the ying-yang dialectical method, whereby two opposing factions, both controlled by the Intelligence Power, appear to ‘compete’ for power, under covert Communism this model was reinstated.

But the relabelled ‘former’ Communists remain Communists, so that no matter who wins elections under the covert Communist model, the Communists always win.

And because the Intelligence Power and the Party under both overt and covert Communism are interpenetrated, it is also the case, as in the United States, that no matter which political grouping appears to win an election, the Intelligence Power always wins.

U.S. POWER MODEL IS ‘PURER’ THAN THE SOVIET MODEL
In the United States, this Leninist model is even ‘purer’ than is the case in the covert Soviet Union, because, like its matching dialectical power vortex in Moscow, the Washington model presupposes the penetration of the Military Power and the dialectical (two)-Party Power by the Intelligence Power, which retains its hegemony thanks to its power of offensive penetration, which in turn stems from its comprehensive deception-only ‘ethic’.

Lies, double-cross, ‘bait and switch’ and endless diversion, by any means and at all times, are its modus operandi. It has no capability to behave in any other manner.

Logically, this also presupposes open-ended cooperation between the controlling Intelligence Power and the organized criminal underworld – which is why the Editor’s book is called The New Underworld Order [available from the books segment of this website].

PROOF THAT THE CIA AND THE MAFIA WORK TOGETHER
For the reality is that the CIA and the mafia work together, both at home and abroad. Thus the Yamashita’s gold papers, which will be featured in detail in International Currency Review, Volume 35, Number 1, to be published in the autumn, contain a diagram that specifically confirms that, in the context of the United States’ criminal operations to steal the stolen Japanese gold (hidden by the Japanese military inter alia in The Philippines during the period of Japanese power hegemony in the earlier years of the Second World War):

(a) The CIA was in charge of the depository financial arrangements with the banks, while:

(b) The mafia was placed in charge of enforcing and protecting the physical delivery of the gold, on behalf of the CIA, to its smelter and other destinations.

In other words the entire operation was not only a criminal Financial Warfare offensive, but was officially recognised to be a covert criminal operation: otherwise, overt law enforcement cadres could have been employed to guarantee and enforce the physical deliveries of the restolen gold, rather than organised crime.

Not that this posed a problem for the coordinators of the Financial Warfare operations concerned. On the contrary, criminality had become the norm, beneath the cover provided by lip-service to the Rule of Law, in accordance with the perverse, obtuse logic of the ‘Black’ French sociologist Emile Durkheim (15th April 1858- 15th November 1917), who managed to persuade gullible thinkers and relativist policymakers that the ‘natural order’ of things presupposes criminal behaviour and the law of the jungle. No doubt this deviant frame of mind had already become well and truly inculcated into the subconscious collective mentality of ‘intelligence professionals’, not least since ‘any and all means’ of destroying the Hitler régime had been ‘legitimised’ during the Second World War.

THE DURKHEIM PARADIGM: ‘ANOMIE’, ‘NORMLESSNESS’
Durkheim taught inter alia that ‘moral goals are those the object of which is society, and to act morally is to act in terms of the collective interest’ (2) – which, being interpreted, corresponds with ‘the end justifies the means’, the chief mantra of Vladimir Lenin, the geomasonic Illuminati and of all ‘Workers of Darkness’. Such a perverse philosophy, of course, overturns the very basis on which civilization is built – the ability to distinguish and to choose between good and evil, which is what the ancient Children of Israel learned before any other ethnic group, a fact that Durkheim, being of Jewish extraction, naturally understood perfectly well.

A watered-down version of Durkheimism was postulated inter alia by the American author Robert K. Merton, who wrote that ‘the technically most effective procedure, whether culturally legitimate or not, becomes typically preferred to institutionally prescribed conduct [and] as this process continues… the society becomes unstable, and develops ‘anomie’, or ‘normlessness’ (3).

This is the stage reached in the United States and Britain today: and both societies are in various stages of disintegration and collapse as a consequence. In the United States, a knowledgeable correspondent based in Washington, DC, emailed the Editor on 26th July, pointing out that that ‘my friends on the Hill are getting slammed by the calls from regular Americans. Staffers are weary of the anger coming at them from outside the Beltway. Anger is mounting, and it is all around. They demand to know what is going on’ (4) – and why, for instance, State employees in Pennsylvania have not been paid for June and were unlikely to be paid in July and August, should this White House continue sabotaging the Settlements, thereby blocking distribution of Obama’s Stimulus Money and the associated promised payments to the States.

COMPROMISED U.S. LAW ENFORCEMENT TRIES AGAIN
As it happens, it is precisely the criminal determination of the highest-level perpetrators of these endless Financial Terrorism offences that we and others have exposed and denounced – summed up by the notoriously defiant statement attributed some weeks ago to George Bush Sr., that ‘we are making so much money by trading these funds that we will just continue doing it until August, and nobody can stop us’ – which is itself driving the Settlements process (insofar as it can be detected).
This is because Gold Badges and other elements of US law enforcement appear belatedly to have woken up to the reality that the official and banking sector perpetrators, who have assumed all along that they have been protected by the National Security Act et. seq., by NSC-68 and given the hegemony of the ‘Durkheim Paradigm’, cannot and will not be allowed to get away with the total destruction of the US financial and real economies (even though this has in reality all but been achieved over the longer term: see below).

For, given the pressure exerted by the Swiss, British and Chinese enforcement cadres and by Swiss financial controllers, US Gold Badges and law enforcement have acquired the determination previously lacking due to their own compromised situations (arising from signatures appended to the equivalent of the British Official Secrets Act, and from bribery), to make life almost impossible for the perpetrators, which we believe is what has been happening behind the scenes.

DISSECTING ELEMENTS OF THE CONTROL MECHANISM
That, however, has not interfered with the requirement reportedly being imposed upon payees by the US Department of Homeland Security for payees to sign a documents agreeing to certain terms including, we surmise, a gag order. Of significance here is the reported decision that has been taken under Obama for the Department of Homeland Security to be folded soon into the National Security Council – creating a prospective White House-centred GESTAPO.

Since the National Security Council is chaired by the Vice President of the United States, it is this appointed (intelligence) official who emerges as more powerful even than the President himself – since, as stated above, the NSC, after the Leninist control model, ‘sits above’ the Presidency and all components of the Federal Government.

It is the NSC, therefore, that instructs, for instance, the National Security Agency to intensify the barrage of official lies, or shall we say ‘destructive ambiguity’, spewed out to the American people nowadays inter alia via the 55++ controlled Internet disinformation outlets (the identities of which have been exposed by the Editor in The New Underworld Order). This background explains why the greatly disliked former Vice President Cheney – a criminal operative and ‘former’ MK-Ultra controller fully conversant with all dimensions of the Himmlerian ‘Black Arts’ portfolio – was correctly perceived by Americans who sensed how evil his vibes were, to be the most powerful Vice President in American history.

As we have explained, intelligence operatives appointed to, or selected for, high office remain intelligence officers after they leave their high-profile posts – which simply means that after leaving office, they continue to handle the operations that they were running while abusing the posts that they previously held. In Richard Cheney’s case, he is reported to us to have continued seamlessly with his life of financial criminality since leaving office, as though no discontinuity had occurred – arrogantly assuming that the protection he enjoyed due to his intelligence background and his official status, could be relied upon to protect him from the consequences of his gross, serial crimes and treasonous betrayal of the trust of the American people.

‘THEY CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO GET AWAY WITH IT’
And if we read the American mood correctly, it is the thought that these criminal finance operatives may be ‘getting away with it’, that infuriates ordinary law-abiding Americans most of all. The common desire is that all these evil people, without any exceptions, should be brought face to face with a régime of merciless severity, given the criminal financial abominations that they have committed in time of war, and their relentless stealing of assets while ordinary Americans have been thrown out of work and face foreclosure on their homes.

As George Bush Sr. is notoriously reported to have observed, ‘if the American people knew what we have done, they’d hang us up on lamp posts’. Our prediction is that if the purge that is at last said to be gathering real momentum in the United States does not take urgent account of this righteous mood on the part of the furious American people, the belatedly-reacting US structures seeking to enforce the Rule of Law may live to regret their complacency.

NSC-68 AUTHORISED OPERATIONS ‘BY ALL MEANS’
NSC-68. issued on 7th April 1950 confirmed that the ‘Truman doctrine’ of ‘containment (of Stalinist expansionism) should not be purely defensive, but should seek quote ‘BY ALL MEANS short of war to foster the seeds of self-destruction within the Soviet system and an intensification of operations by covert means in the fields of economic warfare and political and psychological warfare’ (5).

The important words here have been displayed in CAPITAL LETTERS: ‘by all means’ – which, being interpreted, means of course seeking to achieve the objective by overt, covert and corrupt means, with the assistance of organised crime, deploying all known criminal methodology without restraint, stealing, misappropriating, abusing, discrediting their targets, bearing false witness, murder (even though President Ford, by Executive Order in 1976, prohibited assassinations following a series of botched operations by the CIA’s sinister ‘Health Alteration Committee’), lying to officials, lying in court, and waging unrestrained economic and financial warfare under cover of the intelligence community’s ‘crooks’ charter approved by Congress in 1947, et seq.

FURTHER LEGITIMISATION OF OFFICIAL CRIMINALITY
These developments collectively had the following consequences:

(1). Criminal activity by the Government was comprehensively legitimised.

(2). The Cold war was ‘ratified’, so that the distinction between war and peace was blurred.

(3). The role of US intelligence operations was elevated and expanded, and the size of the intelligence community was greatly enlarged.

This was dangerous enough. But as soon as President Reagan came to office, the new President’s Director of Central Intelligence, the veteran wall Street lawyer and swashbuckling wartime OSS operative, William J. Casey, persuaded Reagan to sign an Executive Order allowing the CIA to conduct covert operations within the continental United States (6).

At his Directorship nomination hearing in January 1981, Casey defined ‘covert action’ as ‘a secret operation with ‘nonacknowledgeability”. At the same time, illustrating his ability to think in double-speak, Casey defined ‘clandestine activity’ as ‘one that is secret, (and) that is not necessarily nonacknowledgeable’. This oblique language referenced the use of corporations which were not covert, but which could operate clandestinely, supporting NSC-CIA operations at home (now) and abroad. The corporations were selected to support covert operations (like the Soviets’ original US corporation, Amtorg), by making legitimate and legally constituted business enterprises available to support the Administration’s covert operations – key examples being Evergreen Aviation, Chemical New York, Capcom Financial, Continental Grain, and (notoriously) Matrix-Churchill.

These and multiple other so-called ‘Enterprise’ and ‘Conus Ops.’ Corporations had to change their operating names and locations after Casey’s suicide in hospital on 6th May 1987, but their NSC-CIA supporting operations continued.

CRUCIAL NATIONAL SECURITY DECISION DIRECTIVES
During 1982 and 1983, the Reagan Administration secretly issued three National Security Decision Directives (NSDD) – NSDD-32, NSDD-66, and NSDD-75 – to steer foreign policy and achieve, at long last, fulfillment of the aggressive Truman policy of destabilising and destroying the Soviet Union ‘by all means’, so that, once again, nothing was precluded. Specifically:

• NSDD-32, issued in March 1982, declared that ‘the United States would seek to neutralize Soviet control over eastern Europe’ and ‘authorized the use of covert action and other means to support anti-Soviet organizations in the region’ (7).

• NSDD-66, issued in November 1982, declared ‘that it would be US policy to disrupt the Soviet economy by attacking a ‘strategic triad’ of critical resources that were deemed essential to Soviet economic survival’ (8).

• NSDD-75, issued in January 1983, ‘called for the United States not to just co-exist with the Soviet Union, but to change it fundamentally’ (9).

SIX EXTERNAL OBJECTIVES IDENTIFIED UNDER REAGAN
Thus both the policy objectives, the presidential (NSC covert) instructions and the needed financial (corporate) conduits were in place by January 1983, with six areas of financial concern highlighted for immediate attention, according to authoritative sources. These were as follows:

(1). The Soviet covert operations uncovered by ‘FAREWELL’ – a source within the Soviet first Chief Directorate run by French counter-intelligence, the DST. The DST agent discovered the Soviets’ intention to steal and/or buy US high-tech technology, via Amtorg-like Soviet corporations, i.e. via ‘mirror images ’ of US ‘Enterprise Ops’. Between 1976 and 1980, for instance, the Soviet Ministry of Aviation had saved over $800 million in Research and Development costs by transferring high-tech technology from the United States via this covert operation (10).

The corollary of this important discovery was that a weakness in the Soviet military complex had been uncovered which, as was interpreted by the Reagan Administration, meant that the Soviets’ reliance on ‘buying’ or else stealing foreign technology could be weakened by undermining the USSR’s ‘purchasing capacity’. The Soviet ‘strategic triad’ consisted of export sales of oil, export sales of natural gas, and the US hard currency resulting from such sales (11).

(2). Poland and continued support for Solidarity (12).

(3). Military support for the anti-Soviet Mujaheddin in Afghanistan (13).

(4). Financial and military support for the Contras in Central America (14).

(5). Funding and support for the purchase of arms by Iraq in the Iran-Iraq War (15) ; and:

(6). Anti-Soviet economic operations designed to achieve a fundamental change in the Soviet system (16), as provided for under NSDD-75.

GOLITSYN’S ‘ONE STEP FORWARD, TWO STEPS BACK’ WARNINGS IGNORED.
Since the CIA were not listening to the warnings about Soviet strategic deception capabilities by Anatoliy Golitsyn (17) (who got some elements of Soviet deception, such as ‘FAREWELL’, wrong), it failed to understand or recall that the Soviet Leninists invariably followed Lenin’s basic teaching religiously – including his famous dictum ‘One Step Forward, Two Steps Back’.

Accordingly, the CIA, and Western intelligence generally, were unaware that the Soviets, having recognised that the Reagan Administration had revitalised Truman’s ‘containment’ policy and was now engaged in waging ruthless warfare against the USSR ‘BY ALL MEANS’ short of war, were now proceeding to apply this Leninist principle to the letter.

Specifically, the Soviets responded, following the ‘Festival of Three Funerals’ (the rapid quick-step demise of Messrs Brezhnev, Andropov (Lieberman) and Chernenko), with the abrupt elevation (not without a couple of murders in the process) of Mikhail Gorbachëv, head of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union’s most powerful structure, the Administrative Department, to the position of CPSU General Secretary. Gorbachëv, who surfaced in the top post in 1985, proceeded without delay to prepare the ground for a deceptive Leninist response.

THE SOVIET RESPONSE TO THE REAGAN OFFENSIVE
Accordingly, the KGB would orchestrate an apparent ‘transformation’ of old Soviet attitudes and society, while Soviet Military Intelligence (the GRU, fronted since 1999 by the top GRU operative Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin) would supervise the continued covert coherence of the Soviet Union, with the Communist Party operating underground.

This dialectical (two-faced, double-minded, Leninist) strategy would, Soviet long-range planners calculated, hoodwink the Americans into assuming that their strategy’s expected ‘success’ would be permanent and could never be reversed, while at the same time providing the Soviet Leninist strategists with a unique opportunity for a ‘Blowback’ operation involving, especially, the release of large numbers of Soviet mafiya operatives from jails and KGB-linked cooperative structures, for penetration of the United States en masse.

The Soviet strategists appear to have calculated, accurately, that US covert operatives would become so intoxicated with the ’success‘ of their Financial Warfare operations against the Soviet Union, that they would fail to understand that the same techniques could and would just as easily be deployed against the United States itself.

RUSSIAN WARNING ABOUT A WAVE OF CRIMINALS
This, certainly, was what the deeply Leninist Russian Serious Crimes Investigator, Boris Uvarov, meant when he told the late Clare Sterling in Moscow in 1992 that Western authorities had no clue what was about to hit them. ‘Naturally it‘s wonderful that the Iron Curtain is gone, but it was a shield for the West’, he told her. ‘Now we’ve opened the gates, and this is very dangerous for the Rest of the World. America is getting Russian criminals; and Europe is getting Russian criminals. They’ll steal everything. They’ll occupy Europe. Nobody will have the resources to stop them. You people in the West don’t know our mafiya yet. You will, you will’ (18).

WHY THE SOVIETS HAD FAITH IN THEIR LENINIST PRESCRIPTION
This of course was a threat, as well as being an informed statement by an official who was fully cognizant of the underlying medium-range Leninist deception strategy of the deliberately ‘chaotic’ era fronted by the former Secretary of the Moscow Communist Party, Boris Yeltsin (Baruch Ellia), and knew what was intended. In simple terms, the aggressive Americans were to be allowed to wallow in their Financial Warfare operations, but in doing so they’d expose the United States itself to destabilization on a scale to rival the ransacking of the Soviet Union. And this devious ‘One Step Forward, Two Steps Back’ strategy would be guaranteed success for two fundamental reasons:

(1) The Americans and British, being motivated by their lust for access to Soviet energy resources, would be allowed to transfer Western technology to the covert Soviets on an open-ended basis until the rehabilitation of the Soviet energy sector was complete, a process that was expected to take a decade. Thereafter, the ‘assets of the Party-State’ would be progressively clawed back by the successor régime which would be directed by Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU), the guardian of the Party-State. Note: In 2003, senior US intelligence officers attending a seaborne conference were shocked when told that Putin is a top GRU operative. They thought he was KGB.

(2) Since the US Financial Warfare operation was being implemented by the CIA, a known criminal enterprise interfacing with and interpenetrated by organized crime, Soviet KGB cadres linked into the vast Soviet underground criminal economy could rely upon US greed and corruption to prevail over the original Reagan-era geostrategic objective – corrupting US operations internally from the outset. Thus the covert Soviet criminalists would enjoy carte blanche as they applied fresh opaque layers of graft and corruption upon the convoluted strata of institutionalised American intelligence community corruption and sleaze, ensuring a terminal condition of corruption throughout the key structures. This calculation, based on the Soviets’ operational experience, proved to be correct.

Its intellectual foundations rested upon analytical work conducted by Yakovlev’s Institute for the Study of the USA and Canada, which had accurately identified the poisonous presence within the US Federal official structures of what we now recognise as the Bush Crime Syndicate, linked via Kissinger and Bush Sr. to the pan-German long-range perversion and subversion operation based in Dachau, Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD). Since the Soviets and the Germans work closely together at the highest intelligence level, the Politburo would in any case have been familiar with the implications of this long-range ‘corruption from within’ operation masterminded by the heirs of the Nazi Abwehr through their Fifth Column operations in America.

THE BUSH-CIA-DVD CRIME SYNDICATE MOVES INTO ACTION
Likewise, having studied the precise workings of the US financial system in detail in 1982-84, Vice President George H. W. Bush arranged for the inside information obtained from that study to be exploited for criminal theft and collateral-grabbing purposes first, via the scamming of the Savings and Loan sector during the 1980s – a development which was triggered almost immediately following liberalization measures implemented early in Reagan’s first term – and secondly, in fulfillment of Reagan’s three Executive Orders mandating the destabilisation of the Soviet Union ‘by all means’ in conformity with NSC-68.

Bush Sr. then set about effectively converting the CIA into his own controlled criminal operation – further locking the CIA into his and the DVD’s orbit by procuring the renaming of the CIA’s Langley headquarters as the ‘George Bush Center for Intelligence’.

It is beyond belief that there appear to have been no brains within the CIA capable and robust enough to work out what such a putsch would mean for the Agency, should it ever be inclined, in any future moment of fleeting sanity, to ‘clean up its act’.

In other words, the stage was now set for the application of criminal methodology in fulfillment of President Reagan’s revitalized Financial and Economic Warfare instructions – a task for which the Bush Crime Syndicate was ideally suited, and for which it assumed it had carte blanche authority.

In the preceding report, we trailed the reinterpretation, therefore, that the ransacking and pillaging of the Soviet Union was a criminal conspiracy perpetrated by the CIA-DVD (Bush) Syndicate under cover of Reagan’s instructions, which ran completely out of control.

One of the key operatives involved in this operation was Leo Wanta, who emerges from all this as George Bush Sr.’s bagman and a custodian of a large number of offshore corporate bank accounts established under Reagan’s Executive Order 12333 which empowered US intelligence operatives to form corporations of which the operative would own the shares and control the bank accounts in question – a wholly reckless departure, given that intelligence operatives specialise in lies and deception so that, by definition, none of them are ever to be trusted.

And some can be trusted less than others.

UPDATED ANALYSIS JUDGED TO BE ACCURATE
As previously reported, when we ‘tested’ this updated analysis recently with a respected and knowledgeable ‘connected’ US source, we were immediately informed that it is accurate – and also that, moreover, whereas this revised analysis is the product of intellectual deduction, the source in question had acquired this understanding as ‘hard information’. This therefore explains why Mr Bush Sr. has been reported at times to insist that the funds held in the ‘Wanta’ bank accounts that the Editor extracted from the mass of documents obtained from the public domain that we hold, were ‘his (George Bush’s) funds’. It is these funds that are intended to be washed (i.e., laundered) THROUGH THE SOVEREIGN, to emerge ‘clean’ and ONTO THE BOOKS, under extreme pressure from the international community headed by The Queen.

Stepping back for a moment, it will therefore be more clearly seen that the ‘takedown’ of the Soviet Union was exploited, in effect, as cover for a colossal pillaging and raping operation by organised criminal elements within the US intelligence community, on a scale with no historical parallel.

And what the Americans may have failed to understand is that, in appearing to collaborate with the US and Western perpetrators of this unprecedented onslaught, the Soviet strategists applied, with consummate skill, Lenin’s ‘One Step forward, Two Steps Back’ principle – with the longer-range objective of making money in the interim and then turning the tables on the rapacious Americans as they complacently gorged themselves with the spoil: which is what has happened.

THE ‘SORCERER’S APPRENTICE SYNDROME’
But beyond that dimension, the heady criminal intoxication associated with the pillaging offensive has exhibited clear signs of the ‘Sorcerer’s Apprentice’ syndrome. Because, having exhausted the seams of the Soviet mine, the Bush-CIA-DVD Syndicate, which was now amply financing not just the CIA’s ‘Black Ops’ budget, but the total political hegemony of the CIA itself was unable, and had no intention, of reverting to its precarious understanding of the ‘Rule of Law’ mode. On the contrary, if the USSR could be ransacked, so could any other target – including the United States itself.

In other words, the precedents of the criminal cadres’ ‘success’ in pillaging the US Savings and Loans and the Soviet Empire, formed the basis for open-ended criminal finance operations across the board – building on the already deeply embedded Fraudulent Finance and trading operations that had long since infected banks all over the world as a direct consequence of the proliferation of US intelligence corporations and their associated clandestine bank accounts – a device copied by the Gorbachëv Politburo in 1991.

WANTA REMOVED FROM ACCESS TO THE ACCOUNTS BY BUSH-CLINTON
Meanwhile, Bush Sr. plotted with his selected associates, the Clintons, to remove Leo Wanta from access to the accounts at the foreign institutions listed again in our report dated 17th July 2009, by orchestrating the events in Lausanne when Mr Wanta was arrested on 7th July 1993 and thrown into that stinking Swiss dungeon on trumped-up charges of not having paid $14,127 of Wisconsin state tax which had in fact been paid twice already (in May and June 1992), and which the Editor’s stolen loan funds extended to Mr Wanta which should have been repaid with interest on 11th June 2007, paid for a third time [see Archive report dated 6th August 2007].

As Wanta, like Vreeland, knew about the 9/11 abomination plot in advance, he was held in jail after the kangaroo court session in 1995, until a few days after the ‘Reichstag Fire’ event, to ensure that any risk of him exposing in advance the insider plot to blow up the Twin Towers arising from his antagonism towards Bush Sr., would be minimised (info from a source ‘special’ to this service).

‘UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES’ COVER FOR CHAOTIC OUTCOMES
It is worth pointing out here that the above outline of how this crisis has developed in recent years remains consistent with the well-known dialectical, manipulative methodology whereby the self-appointed and deluded power elite, working through Freemasonry which acts as the host for Sufi-Sabbatean Illuminism in its many perverted formats, seeks to achieve its objectives.

The well-known cycle of Thesis, Antithesis and Synthesis revealed by Engels never actually reaches the pre-planned Synthesis because its sponsor, the Devil, is the author of all lies and confusion. It follows that the operations of all Workers of Darkness – the CIA and its affiliates, DVD, KGB, GRU et al. – invariably lead to chaos and confusion: or, to satisfy the complacent intellects of ‘the interested’, to so-called ‘unintended consequences’.

This means that outcomes always diverge from what was planned and intended – a lesson that these people seem quite incapable of absorbing.

OBAMA’S HIDEOUS HEALTH CARE LEGISLATION:
THE GOVERNMENT WILL APPEAR AT YOUR DEATHBED
Accordingly, the operatives in charge of the White House, the American Treasury and the Federal Reserve have shown themselves to be incapable of comprehending the inevitable ‘unintended consequences’ of their perverse behaviour, which the Obama Administration is compounding with such incredible follies as the HR 3200 Health Care Bill which the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office calculates will saddle US taxpayers, at its conservative estimate, with $1.04 trillion in new Federal outlays over the next decade. This iniquitous Leninist bill provides, incidentally, for the US authorities to sanction the de facto murder of ‘end-of-life’ patients [see pages 85, Line 7; 272, Section 1145; 425, Lines 4-12; 425, Lines 22-25; 426, Lines 1-3; 427, Lines 15-24; 429, Lines 1-9; 429, Lines 10-12; 429, Lines 13-25; and 430, Lines 11-15 of HR 3200].

Further, this ideologically motivated draft legislation – a primary component of the ‘convergence’ operation to achieve ‘Synthesis’ between the socialising United States and the ‘capitalising’ covert Soviet Union – disregards the financial implications: illustrating the point made above, namely that the key structures of the US Government are not interested in contemplating the train wrecks they are engaged in creating and exacerbating.

THE DEVASTATING TESTIMONY OF NEIL BAROFSKY
By far the most telling indication of this syndrome surfaced on 20th July, when it was reported (first briefly by Bloomberg and on 21st July, equally briefly by the Financial Times) that Neil Barofsky, the CONGRESS-appointed technocrat who operates from within the Treasury as the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP), had informed the Congress, in testimony prepared for a hearing on 21st July before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, that the total value of new guarantees and obligations amassed by the Treasury since the passage of the TARP legislation in November 2008, had reached $23.7 trillion.

Mr Barofsky, whom President Obama (who has now taken to sacking Inspectors General to whose findings he (or Rahm Emanuel) takes exception) cannot dismiss, because he is a Congressionally-mandated appointment, went on to make the following DEVASTATING STATEMENT for the frantic Congress to consider:

‘TARP has evolved into a program of unprecedented scope, scale and complexity’.

DEADLY CONSEQUENCE OF HANDING UNLIMITED POWERS TO PAULSON
This has happened because, as you will doubtless recall, that criminal Henry M. Paulson, aided and abetted by the now suddenly more sanguine Dr Ben Bernanke, appeared before the Congress last October and threatened Armageddon, if the Legislative Branch did not immediately provide the Treasury Secretary with the sweeping powers that he demanded (on the basis of a three-page draft bill which the duo handed to Congressmen for their attention).

After Congress rejected this blackmail out of hand, it then did what it always does – embarked upon a stupendous pork-barrel fest, producing a bill running to nearly 480 pages. Although the Treasury Secretary did not manage to pull off his arrogant ‘total immunity from all future consequences of my actions’ provision, Paulson DID obtain blanket powers to do what he liked.

RECKLESS DISPLAY OF IRRESPONSIBLE TREASURY STEWARDSHIP
So he proceeded, after passage of the bill, to embark upon the most reckless display of wanton behaviour ever perpetrated by any US Treasury Secretary since the foundation of this benighted Republic – focusing on the provision of guarantees to Fraudulent Finance derivatives transactions which, as we have demonstrated, are devoid of all value since the packaged, securitised and on-sold assets are stamped WITHOUT RECOURSE by banks offering them for securitisation.

ESSENCE OF THE ‘WITHOUT RECOURSE’ FRAUD
For instance, a typical housing mortgage Promissory Note for a mortgagor in Virginia dated May 2006 of which we hold a copy, is stamped: Pay to the Order of [Blank] WITHOUT RECOURSE: Bank of America N.A.; By: Christina M. Schmitt [Signature], Assistant Vice President. The accompanying Deed of Trust is stamped: Pay to the order of [Blank] WITHOUT RECOURSE: Bank of America N.A.; By: John E. Mack, Sr. Vice President. The text of the Deed of Trust contains the following language:

‘Lender: the word “lender” means Bank of America, N.A., its successors and assigns. The words “successors and assigns” mean any person or company that acquires any interest in the Credit Agreement’.

From this example, the following is concluded:

(1). Bank of America absolves itself of all responsibility for the fact that the ‘asset’ is ‘dud’ because it has stamped the papers: WITHOUT RECOURSE.

(2). Nevertheless, the bank is aware, given this stamp, that the ‘asset’ is devoid of real value, given that the ONLY real income stream consists of the mortgage payments by the mortgagor to the bank. Thereafter, as the bank makes clear via its WITHOUT RECOURSE stamp, which was appended to the documents AFTER their signature by the mortgagor and without his/her knowledge, no ‘assign’ can have access to the sole income stream.

(3). Even so, the bank intends to sell this ‘asset’ to an ‘assign’ for packaging (securitisation), or bundling with X other ‘assets’ by a specialist ‘packaging house’ for onward sale to whichever Fraudulent Finance specialist purchases the bundle, and to pay what it is prepared to pay for it.

(4). The bank has extended the definition of ‘lender’ to include ‘assigns’ even though the ‘assigns’ actually do no lending. All that happens is that the bank receives a second (discounted) payment from the ‘packager’, on top of the income stream from the mortgagor.

(5). The bank is itself engaged in dubious finance, while the ‘assigns’ are engaged in Fraudulent Finance operations – marketing ‘assets’ that are underpinned by no flow of funds, as the ‘assets’ are stamped WITHOUT RECOURSE.

NEW JERSEY COURT DECISION AGAINST DEUTSCHE BANK
On 14th July 2009, as we briefly reported, a new Jersey Court dismissed a foreclosure action filed against the sundry borrowers by Deutsche Bank Trust Company America as the alleged Trustee for a securitised mortgage loan trust after Deutsche Bank had wilfully, and despite the entry of THREE separate Court orders, refused (i.e. proved UNABLE) to produce top-copy documents demanded by the borrowers which included documents setting forth the identity of the true owner and holder of the Promissory Note and of the mortgage, the complete chain of title to ownership of the Note and mortgage, payment application histories, and documents as to the securitised loan trust.

The Court had given Deutsche Bank multiple opportunities and extensions of time within which to produce the documents, but Deutsche Bank continually refused (i.e. was UNABLE) to produce ANY of the documents requested, resulting in the dismissal of Deutsche bank’s foreclosure action. The Court also ruled that Deutsche Bank is not permitted to re-file any foreclosure action whatsoever until it is produces ALL of the subject discovery. The attorney representing the borrowers, W. J. Barnes PA, has numerous other cases pending, in which similar discovery requests have been lodged with Deutsche Bank, none of which had been complied with. And it gets worse.

NEW YORK COURT RULING AGAINST DEUTSCHE BANK
Deutsche Bank was additionally the subject of a recent ruling in a case in New York in which the Court denied Deutsche Bank’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Without elaborating in detail here, it transpired that 142 days after the borrower was claimed to be in default, a ‘derived’ ‘asset’ based on his mortgage agreement (i.e. a ‘toxic’ loan) was assigned to Deutsche Bank. The Court required a satisfactory explanation, via sworn Affidavit, by an officer of the securitised trust, as to why, in the middle of ‘our national subprime mortgage financial crisis’, Deutsche Bank would consider it sensible to purchase a nonperforming loan from a nominee.

The Court further enquired as to whether Deutsche Bank violated a corporate fiduciary duty to the Note holders of the securitised mortgage loan trust with the purchase of a loan that had defaulted 142 days prior to the assignment of the (therefore ‘toxic’) loan to the trust.

A commentary provided by Attorney Barnes elaborated: ‘It appears that Deutsche Bank may have done so to take advantage of one or more ‘credit enhancements’ inside the securitised mortgage loan trust which pay benefits upon declaration of the default. These credit enhancements are extremely complicated and multi-layered, and are required by law in connection with the issuance and sale of the mortgage-backed securities ‘backed’ by the trust’.

‘The assignment of the mortgage and Note to the securitized trust, which were already in default well in advance of the assignment, would permit Deutsche Bank both to realize a profit through payment of credit enhancement benefits (which effect a paydown of the claimed ‘default’) while simultaneously permitting Deutsche Bank to institute a foreclosure, thereby resulting in a ‘double dip’ (actually, a triple-or-more dip’ – Ed.) for Deutsche Bank. This is, of course, illegal; but unless competent counsel raises the issue, it goes unnoticed and Deutsche Bank, like so many other foreclosing parties, winds up stealing the borrower’s property and getting paid for doing it’.

However, as our report dated 26th December 2007 pointed out, the original lending bank actually winds up being paid prospectively FOUR TIMES for the same mortgage: first, by the mortgagor; secondly by the ‘packager’; thirdly, via the insurance mechanism outlined above; and in the fourth place, when the bank enters the real estate market and sells the foreclosed property.

U.S. COURTS ARE KNOCKING THE FALSE BOTTOM OUT OF DERIVATIVES
We are now at the receiving end of a massively expanding portfolio of detailed information about such cases, which are piling up in the Courts right across the United States. An especially large file of foreclosure cases has been sent to us from California. The significance of all this hassle is that as unfortunate Americans and their advisers are becoming better informed about these frauds, and as the US Courts become less and less willing to tolerate the criminal behaviour of the recalcitrant big lending banks, the bottom is gradually being knocked out of the fraudulent derivatives sector BY THE COURTS themselves, even as the financial engineers try to revive securitisation.

This makes it all the more reprehensible that Mr Barofsky had to inform Congress on 21st July 2009 that the Treasury had guaranteed $23.7 trillion of trash ‘assets’ since the Legislative Branch was blackmailed and bounced into making the catastrophic mistake of endowing the Treasury Secretary with unlimited powers to do exactly what he liked, to ‘save the system’ – when what was actually going on was that the US Treasury was buttressing the criminal enterprise banks which had all been running this ‘bankers’ ramp’ for years.

BAROFSKY CITES ‘CONFLICTS OF INTEREST’ AND ‘COLLUSION’
Nor did Mr Neil Barofsky mince his words when he appeared before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. In his report to Congress, the Congressionally-appointed official whom Obama and Geithner cannot sack, elaborated that ‘disagreements remain’ between his Office of the Inspector-General for the Troubled Assets Relief Program [Sigtarp) and the Treasury itself over various crucial matters, and that there are [READ THIS CAREFULLY]:

‘… FUNDAMENTAL VULNERABILITIES… RELATING TO CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND COLLUSION, TRANSPARENCY, PERFORMANCE MEASURES, AND ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING’.

TREASURY TRIES TO BURY BAROFSKY’S DEVASTATING REPORT
The Geithner Treasury’s response to this scathing criticism from its very own Congressionally-appointed official was the quite astonishing one of trying to dismiss Mr Barofsky’s $23.7 trillion out of hand, with the add-on that it was ‘not useful’. However, significantly, the US Treasury’s response EXPLICITLY failed to challenge Mr Barofsky’s arithmetic – given that he had in fact simply added up the new obligations and guarantees, which was how he arrived at his number.

Obviously, Mr Geithner et al recognise that if he so wishes, Mr Barofsky has the option of providing the Congress with a complete list of the guarantees and obligations in question.

The Treasury simply retorted that the total included programmes that had never been used or that were being wound down. But it gave the game away by attempting to minimise what it knows is a calamitous state of affairs, by complaining that Barofsky had failed to incorporate assets acquired by the Government, such as equity in banks and automobile manufacturers, which, the Treasury, claimed, offset some of the risk that the Treasury had acquired! The vacuous hollowness of that claim revealed just how bare the Treasury’s intellectual cupboard has become.

Aware of the explosive nature of Neil Barofsky’s revelations, the Treasury then did its best to smother the report altogether – which of course is why we draw your kind attention to its quite exceptional importance here.

BERNANKE CONDEMNS HIMSELF AND HIS STEWARDSHIP
Meanwhile in his Congressional testimony and public comments at a ‘town-hall-style’ meeting in Kansas City, Missouri, Dr Bernanke has revealed that total Medicare and Medicaid obligations outstanding already exceed $35 trillion, so that the proposed Barack Obama Health Care Bill would (unstated) hardly be a wise move. Astonishingly, Bernanke told the Kansas City meeting that not only was he ‘not going to be the US Federal Reserve Chairman who presided over another Great Depression’, but that ‘I have a lot of confidence that within a few years [sic] we will not only be back on track, but that we will be growing strongly again’.

This is ‘hard to believe’, given that all observers are aware that the ‘next whammy’ will be the commercial real estate sector, which suffers from exactly the same toxicity, and for the same Fraudulent Finance reasons, as the devastated home mortgage sector. One assumes that Dr Bernanke was just flannelling to keep his audience happy on that occasion.

FED CHAIRMAN HINTS AT YET MORE GUARANTEES – FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE
Indeed, when testifying before the Senate Banking Committee on 25th July, Dr Bernanke admitted that a prospective wave of defaults in the commercial real estate sector ‘may’ present a ‘difficult’ challenge for the US economy. Under questioning, the Chairman then reached immediately for the Paulson/Geithner solution, telling the Committee that the authorities ‘could’ provide Government guarantees for commercial mortgages – against the background of an average 7.6% decline in commercial real estate prices in May, bringing to total decline to 35% since the market’s peak, according to Moody’s Investors Service. Real Capital Analytics Inc. reported in late July 2009 that commercial properties in the United States valued at more than $108 billion are now in default.

But Dr Bernanke has NO SOLUTION EXCEPT MORE OF THE SAME. This is what he told Senator Christopher Dodd (Stalin’s grandson), the Committee Chairman:

‘As the recession’s gotten worse in the last six months or so’ [unspoken: thanks to the perverse application of the WRONG policy responses selected by myself and my White House and Treasury colleagues – Ed.] ‘we’re seeing increased vacancies, declining rents, falling prices – and so, more pressure on commercial real estate. We are somewhat concerned about that sector and are paying very close attention to it. We’re taking the steps that we can through the banking system and also through the securitization markets to try to address it’.

$60 TRILLION ON THE BASIS OF THESE NUMBERS ALONE, AND COUNTING
So, in the face of $35 trillion of unfounded Medicaid and Medicaid obligations, plus $1.04 trillion of additional avoidable costs arising from Obama’s recycled Hillary Clinton Health Care Bill, and $23.7 trillion of guarantees and obligations identified by Mr Neil Barofsky, for a total of $59.74 trillion and counting, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board is nonchalantly suggesting that, given the powers enabling the Treasury secretary to do anything he likes that the compromised Congress so recklessly handed to Henry M. Paulson and his successor, it might be a good idea for open-ended guarantees to be dished out to the failing commercial real estate sector, as well.

And in almost the same breath, Dr Bernanke also told the Senate Banking Committee that the market for debt ‘backed’ by commercial mortgages ‘has completely shut down’ – even though the Chairman simultaneously said that the authorities would be taking ‘what steps we can… through the securitization markets’ to ‘address’ the problem.

BERNANKE’S NUMBERS RUBBISH THE OMB DATA
In addition, to make matters worse, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board may not have fully appreciated that in revealing his $35 trillion outstanding obligations estimate for Medicaid and Medicare, he was contradicting the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Peter Orczag. According to the OMB’s ‘reworked’ debt data presented for public consumption in the first quarter of 2009, are as follows (in millions of dollars):

• (1) Gross Federal Debt, as published by the Office of Management and Budget: $ 12,867,455.

• (2) Less: Funds Held by Government Accounts (as required by Statute). These are all earmarked Trust Funds, required to meet future welfare etc obligations: $ 4,336,088.

• (3) ‘Total’ Federal Debt as reported by the Office of Management and Budget. This ‘total’ is a ‘smoke and mirrors’ number, since the funds in Column 2 are not only required by Stature to meet future commitments, entitlements, etc, but have already been squandered as current expenditure, as the surpluses in the Trust funds are required by law to be ‘invested’ in the Federal Funds (= for current expenditure): $ 8,531,367.

• (4) Therefore, to arrive at the ‘true’ US Federal Debt outstanding on the basis of the OMB’s published data (which is itself unreliable), the Trust Fund data from Column 2 must be added back to so-called ‘Total Federal Debt. Column 4 shows Federal Debt with Debt Held by Government Accounts added back: $ 17,203,543.

• (5) HOWEVER, since the Trust Fund monies [Column 2] have actually been spent on current expenditure, the objective reality is that the Column 2 data should be ‘added back’ TWICE – to reflect (a) the fact that the Trust Fund monies have been squandered as required by law on current expenditure; and (b) the requirement for these earmarked funds to be available to meet future obligations: $ 21,539,631.

Source: Table in Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 3 & 4, page 30.

[We arrive at almost $30 trillion in column 5, on the basis of the OMB’s current numbers, only in 2014 – and, furthermore, column 5 is ‘controversial’ because it incorporates the squandered Trust Fund accruals twice, to account for (a) the fact that they have long since been dissipated on current expenditure, and (b) are required to meet future mandatory obligations, as well].

OFFICIALS PLAY FAST AND LOOSE WITH EACH OTHER’S NUMBERS
So, while everyone is aware that the OMB’s numbers are in any case made of India Rubber, it is noteworthy that Dr Ben Bernanke, who, with his colleagues Paulson and Geithner, has knowingly played fast and loose with the financial futures of hundreds of millions of American taxpayers for several generations to come, likewise plays fast and loose with Mr Orszag’s numbers, as well. Both of you can’t be right, Dr Bernanke. Or did you imagine that nobody would notice?

Of course, the Chairman’s estimate is much more likely to be ‘ballpark’ than those published by the notoriously inaccurate Office of Management and Budget. But, just as we have the Treasury’s Neil Barofsky saying one devastating thing only to be contradicted by his own Treasury colleagues, so we also have the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board rubbishing the figures published for public consumption by the Director of the OMB.

Meanwhile, a conservatively estimated additional $1.04 trillion is to be added to the slate as the bill for Obama’s Leninist Health Care legislation, which inserts the Government at Americans’ death bedsides, and ties their heirs up with many further trillions of costs – to be financed by a Treasury that is bankrupt and has willfully refused to implement the US Dollar Refunding procedures which alone have the capability of lifting the United States’ finances out of the morass for which these criminal financiers, intent upon protecting themselves and their co-conspiring criminal financial enterprises, are responsible.

THE QUEEN’S POINTED QUESTION AT THE L.S.E.
In Britain, the press has refocused on an incident in November last year when Her Majesty The Queen visited the London School of Economics. Her Majesty, who is extremely astute and well informed, asked Professor Luis Garicano, of the Economics Management Department, about the origins of the credit crisis, with the following question:

‘Why did nobody notice it?’

The Professor told The Queen:

‘At every stage, someone was relying on somebody else and everyone thought they were doing the right thing’.

The Professor said later: ‘The Queen asked me: ‘If these things were so large, how come everyone missed them?’ (19).

Following The Queen’s visit, Professor Tim Besley (a member of the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee, no less) and Professor Peter Hennessy, a prominent political historian, wrote a three-page letter to The Queen, some details of which have now, all of a sudden, been released. The letter contained the following:

‘In summary, Your Majesty, the failure to foresee the timing, extent and severity of the crisis and to head it off, while it had many causes, was principally a failure of the collective imagination of many bright people, both in this country and internationally, to understand the risks to the system as a whole’ (20).

LETTER TO THE QUEEN EXAMINED BY THE BRITISH ACADEMY
On Sunday, The Observer addressed the same matter; and according to that newspaper, Professor Garicano’s response to Her Majesty’s question was more extensive:

‘She seemed very interested and asked me: ‘How come nobody could foresee it?’ I think the main answer is that people were doing what they were paid to do, and they behaved according to their incentives, but in many instances they were being paid to do the wrong things from our society’s perspective’ (21).

Both newspapers revealed that the content of the letter to The Queen was discussed at the British Academy in June, in the presence of Nick MacPherson, the UK Treasury Permanent Secretary, the Chief Economist with Goldman Sachs, Jim O’Neill, and The Observer’s distinguished veteran economics columnist, known to the Editor of this service, William Keegan.

Mr Keegan used to read our material, but appears to have failed to do so of late.

QUEEN MISINFORMED BY THESE NOTED ‘EXPERTS’
Likewise, the Bank of England cancelled its subscription to International Currency Review some time ago when we ‘got too hot’ for the journal to be seen lying around on official desks inside that establishment. The British Treasury is severely delinquent with its subscription, a point repeatedly brought up by our back-office with its subscription intermediaries, Swets, And in one of his very last moves before leaving office, Henry M. Paulson ordered the Library at the US Treasury to cancel the subscription to International Currency Review that had been running since 1970.

All of which is somewhat unfortunate since, if these ‘experts’ had bothered to read and take on board what we posted on this website on 2nd September 2006, again in early December 2006, and in the summer of 2007, and what we have meticulously published in International Currency Review as the crisis exploded in their faces, they would have seen the train wreck coming.

The Professors at the London School of Economics have even less excuse here, because the LSE subscribes to this journal. And when they resorted to the usual trick of ‘experts’ and politicians who have failed to do their job properly and are very anxious not to be held accountable for their failures – claiming that ‘nobody could possibly have foreseen this, and nobody did’ – they most unfortunately misinformed Her Majesty The Queen.

What they SHOULD have said was that ‘the crisis was predicted by International Currency Review, Your Majesty, but we did not take their predictions seriously’.

IRAQI LEADER’S SECRET VISIT TO THE WHITE HOUSE
On Friday 24th July, the Prime Minister of Iraq, or possibly the President of Iraq, was driven to the White House – a fact that has not been reported in the open media. His unnanounced appearance snarled the traffic and closed down Pennsylvania Avenue – raising the question: what was the purpose of this ‘secret’ visit?

We speculate that its purpose was to make arrangements for stolen and diverted funds stashed by the official American financial operatives with the White House-controlled Central Bank of Iraq to be disgorged by the Central Bank (with payoffs for Iraqi officials, naturally) and probably also for certain related funds to be channelled into tax-free country accounts with the International Monetary Fund and/or the World Bank. These are the only hiding places left.

Disgorgement of hidden funds held with the Central Bank of Iraq will have been ‘necessary’ given indications of a few Settlements payments having been effected ahead of Monday 27th July, until which date the funds earmarked for payout were said by sources to be ‘encumbered’.

At 3:55 a.m. EDT, The Washington Post announced that the US Secretary of Defence and former Director of Central Intelligence, Robert Gates, arrived in southern Iraq for an unannounced visit. The newspaper said he would be meeting Prime Minister Nouri al-Malaki. Again on a speculative basis, this strongly suggests that there are problems between the White House and the Iraqi Government over the disgorgement of funds stashed with the Central Bank of Iraq.

• We stress that this is OUR interpretation, but people we have spoken with did not deny it.

HOMELAND SECURITY DOCUMENT TO BE SIGNED
This information was associated with reports to the Editor that payees were being required to sign a document proffered by the Department of Homeland Security laying down the terms on which the payees’ remittance could be accepted. According to our sources, some payees were extremely surprised at being asked to sign anything.

• We were told that in the absence of such signatures, the payees would forfeit their funds.

• The Homeland Security document was also thought to embrace a gag order.

INCREASINGLY HYPER WHITE HOUSE BEHAVIOUR AHEAD OF HIGH-LEVEL CHINESE VISIT
Since our last posting, President Obama is reported to have fired his Secret Service chief (the report of which was removed from the Internet). Pennsylvania Avenue has been blocked off with yellow tape (as of 25th July, at least), and the White House helicopters were flying in and out of the White House grounds all day on Saturday, with tourists not allowed anywhere near the place.

A resident mole tells us that policemen were everywhere to be seen, while cell phones and laptops were being scrambled and cell telephone messages truncated after no more than three sentences, when connections were being lost.

• Additionally, as posted below, we have received our first tentative report about ‘people being removed’. While the very noticeable commotions in Washington on Saturday, reported to us now by several sources, could have been related to the visit of the Chinese delegation [see below], it is also speculated that they may have been connected to implied ‘horizontalisations’. Obama’s earlier on-TV comment that if people break into his house, they will be shot [see also below] can similarly be viewed in this context. These considerations are all SPECULATIVE at this juncture.

Recently, low-flying aircraft operated ALL NIGHT over Washington DC. Enquirers were told that NORAD was conducting some ‘tests’ over the capital, which was, to put it mildly, highly unusual.

However these disturbances were thought initially to have been associated with the arrival of a huge high-level Chinese delegation in Washington. At least 150 Chinese officials decended on the US capital for dozens of meetings with their US counterparts.

• As a consequence, much of Washington was again brought to a standstill on Monday 27th July.

Although these annual US-Chinese (G-2) meetings are of course prescheduled, the presence of the Iraqi leader in Washington on 24th July, followed by the Chinese delegation, suggested linkage to the Settlements crisis, with both Iraq and China intensively and deeply involved in the resolution.

The crisis has completely destabilised the psychology of Americans, who blame incompetent and corrupt officials across the board for their country’s plight (same in Britain). This cannot continue.
It was the DC mole who informed us (see above): ‘My friends on the Hill are getting slammed by calls from regular Americans. Staffers are weary of the anger coming at them from outside the Beltway. Anger is mounting, and its all around. They are demanding to know what’s going on’.

Finally, at a televised press conference earlier concerning the peculiar incident in Cambridge, MA on 16th July 2009, when a 58-year-old male Black, Mr Henry Gates, of Ware Street, Cambridge, was arrested after a sustained racialist yelling incident, President Obama uttered words to the effect: ‘If anyone breaks into my house, they get shot’ [LATE AMENDMENT: SEE ABOVE].

It is highly unusual for the President of the United States to utter such an intimidating comment in public. So, was the Cambridge incident either used or staged, so as to provide the POTUS with an opportunity to issue such a warning on camera?

If ‘people were being removed’ [see below], one can easily imagine why the Presidnet might want to promulgate such a warning publicly. As a warning to those planning his own removal?

HIDDEN CRISIS FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION, TOO
In conformity with the norm that everything these evil people touch descends into chaos and confusion, as their house is built on lies, Germany’s highest Court recently pronounced on the Lisbon Treaty, on which the Euro-manipulators are relying for the final destruction of what remains of the national sovereignty of the European satrapies (sorry, ‘Member States’).

Last year, Irish voters, who are as stroppy, if not more so, than the British electorate, slapped the Euro-manipulators down by voting NO THANK YOU to the Lisbon Treaty, which must be ratified by all 27 EU ‘Member States’ before the next stage of this World Revolution dimension can proceed.

As on previous occasions when ‘ungrateful’ national electorates have given the Euro-snakes a black eye, a new Referendum is being organised for October this year, so that the Irish electorate can benefit from the opportunity to ‘change its mind’. The Irish enjoy being kicked and ordered around even less than the compliant and complacent British: so the outcome of this outrageous piece of political engineering is uncertain – although the EU’s calculation is that since the Irish have been comprehensively ‘enronised’ (but not by the EU: rather, by the Clinton wing of the Bush-DVD Crime Syndicate), they won’t relish being ‘left out in the cold’ by voting NO again. The reality, of course, is that if Ireland hadn’t swapped its national currency for the Euro, it would have been able to devalue the old punt, thereby recalibrating its economy to the new realities of the situation.

Anyway, as usual the Germans must have the last say on all EU matters, since the entire project is a construct promulgated under Hitler [see: ‘Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft’ (viz: ‘European Economic Community’)], the proceedings of a Nazi seminar convened by Verein Berliner Kaufleute and Wirtschafts-Hochschule und Industrieller, Berlin, in 1941 and later published by Hauder & Spenersche Verlagsbuchhandlung Max Paschke in 1942 – the seminar chapter headings of which correspond almost precisely with those of the Maastricht Treaty (1992).

GERMAN COURT’S RULING ON THE LISBON TREATY
So there was much backslapping in Brussels when Germany’s highest Court handed down a verdict since we last reported to the effect that the Lisbon Treaty complies with Germany’s Basic Law, and so can therefore be adopted by the German State.

However gloating gave way to angst after closer analysis of the Court’s complex judgment showed that it severely curbs any prospect of a Federal Europe being established in practice.

For, according to the German judges, the European Parliament (which is modelled on the Supreme Soviet) is not a true parliament in any proper sense (given that its purpose is entirely to act as a venting mechanism and rubber-stamping factory) which represents a ‘structural democratic deficit preventing further EU integration’.

The judges also took the opportunity to point out that German law ‘prohibits the transfer [to the European Union Collective] of competence to decide its own competence’.

On top of which, Germany’s highest judges have decreed that the German Court must be able to overturn judgments of the European Court of Justice if they diverge from national (German) law. Which is anathema to the Brussels agenda.

This ruling contradicts the entire pernicious EU doctrine of the ‘acquis communautaire’ which lays down that once an element of national sovereignty has been handed to the political collective, it cannot be retrieved by the satrapy which foolishly handed the competence over in the first place.

In other words, the German Court’s ruling challenges the basis of the entire European Union dimension of the World Revolution.

The foregoing does not mean, as some will doubtless rush to assume, that our demonstration that the EU Collective is a pan-German revolutionary hegemony project, is mistaken. No. What it means is that even the Germans are starting to dislike the taste of their own foul medicine. In other words, important German minds are beginning to realise that the monster that the Hitler-era pan-Germans and their heirs have erected, built upon the Franco-German axis ‘set in stone’ by the Treaty of the Elysée of January 1963, is unworkable, counterproductive and may have passed its sell-by date.

If the Irish reject the Lisbon Treaty this October – as, in their own interests, they should (why squander the national independence they fought for?), we’ll certainly be able to reiterate that point later this year, with greater emphasis.

DR HANS TIETMEYER: THE E.U.’S GORBACHEV
Finally, there may be other reasons for this slight ‘loosening’ of the German jackboot. Deutsche Bank is in extreme danger of collapse given the colossal volume of Fraudulent Finance ‘toxic’ assets that it has accumulated during the years when it controlled trading and thought that the fraudulent derivatives and false securitisation bonanza would continue for ever.

In this connection, it is to be noted that the 79th Annual Report of the Bank for International Settlements reconfirms (on page 145) that the Chairman of the BIS’s Administrative Committee is Dr Hans Tietmeyer – who also ‘just happens’ to be in charge of the Vatican Bank, over which presides the German Pope, Herr Ratzinger.

It will be recalled that, as head of the CPSU’s Administrative Department, Mikhail Gorbachëv held the most powerful position within the entire edifice of the Soviet structures. There is an exact parallel here with the fact that Dr Tietmeyer, a former President of the Deutsche Bundesbank, chairs the Bank for International Settlements’ Administrative Committee.

‘BULLETS WILL FLY AFTER 19TH JULY’: UPDATE
At about 3:15pm UK time on 28th July, we received the first intimation under this heading [see the preceding report; 17th July 2009]. Sources advised that quote ‘some people have been removed’, but when pressed for further information, could or would not elaborate. That’s all we know at this stage. However previously, there had been total silence on this score. TO BE CONFIRMED. [Note that there is some further elaboration to this development, above].

• And separately:

WHAT ARE WE DOING IN AFGHANISTAN? OUR QUESTION IS NOW THE #1 UK PUBLIC ISSUE
Last year, we wrote to the British Ministry of Defence asking what on earth Britain is doing in Afghanistan, and would our assumption that we are protecting the heroin trade by any chance be correct? As we have repeatedly reported, the Ministry of Defence chose not to respond to our enquiry at all, despite the fact that we warned that if they failed to provide us with a satisfactory answer, or to respond at all, we would have to conclude that our assumption is indeed accurate, and would continue to advise our readers and subscribers accordingly.

This isssue has now risen to the top of the immense pile of issues of primary public concern. For instance, Charles Moore ran a huge Op-Ed piece recently in The Daily Telegraph, asking precisely the same question. And since British troops are dying like flies in Afghanisatn, the entire UK press corps is now demanding answers to our question. After all, if we knew WHY the troops were dying, that might provide some sparse consolation. But we don’t, and the perverse Ministry of Defence won’t tell us. because it can’t, or else it would be lying. And although it doesn’t mind telling lies, it cannot afford to be CAUGHT OUT TELLING PORKIES TO THE BRITISH PUBLIC.

This case highlights, of course, a crucially evil dimension of the World Revolution, which is this. Everything is collectivised. There are no national interests, only international interests. Therefore, British troops are dying in support of international interests. However these cannot be spelled out because any explanation might run the risk of revealing the true underlying agenda, which in this case includes acquiring, consolidating and maintaining total control over the heroin trade: not to suppress it, but to exploit it in order to ensure the continuation of the endless pipeline of money generated by drug-trafficking that lubricates the interbank market, as confirmed by the head of UNODC (the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime), Vienna, in his interview published in the Austrian journal Profil last January [see this service, passim].

Now, if the Ministry of Defence would care finally to answer the Editor’s question, in order to dispel this interpretation, before our huge readership accepts this analysis as being accurate, it remains very welcome, at this late stage, to make amends and to respond as it should have done last year.

• Otherwise, we will stick to this line, and so will everyone else who is not sitting on their brains.

• PS: We have separate input from a distinguished Canadian source to the effect that Canadian military officers are questioning what the Canadian armed forces are doing in Afghanistan, too. The answer is the same as that given above: they are assisting with the implementation of international objectives driven by an internationalist agenda that is divorced from the interests of Canada as a sovereign nation state. Belated realisation that this is the case will, we predict, make it harder for the globalist manipulators to dragoon national forces into their filthy wars in the future, especially given prevailing economic and financial conditions. The phrase ‘own goal’ springs to mind here.

Notes and References:

• With the exception of Notes 4, 17 and 18 these Notes and References are ALL taken from Michael C. Cottrell’s work ‘Elite Power and Capital Markets’ referenced above, below the Editor’s credits.

• The information to which the Notes and References refer is derived from Mr Cottrell’s work.

• This is augmented by the Editor’s background knowledge as Editor of Soviet Analyst.

(1). G. J. A. O’Toole, ‘Honorable Treachery’, New York, The Atlantic Monthly Press, 1991, page 449.

(2). Robert T, Hall, Emile Durkheim: Ethics and The Sociology of Morals, West Port, Greenwood Press, Inc., 1987, page 87.

(3). Robert K. Merton, ‘Social Theory and Social Structure’, New York, The Free Press, 1968, p. 189.

(4). Email from a Washington, DC, correspondent dated 26th July 2009, received at 16:42 UK time.

(5). Christopher Andrew, ‘For the President’s Eyes Only, New York, HarperCollins Publishers, 1995, page 183.

(6). Ronald Brownstein and Nina Easton, ‘Reagan’s Ruling Class’, Washington DC, Presidential Accountability Group, 1982, page 623.

(7). Peter Schweitzer, ‘Victory: the Reagan Administration’s Secret Strategy that hastened the Collapse of the Soviet Union’, New York, The Atlantic Monthly Press, 1994, page xvi.

(8). Ibid.

(9). Ibid.

(10). Schweitzer, op. cit., page 47.

(11). Schweitzer, op. cit, pages 132-140.

(12). Robert M Gates, From the Shadows, New York, Simon & Schuster, 1996, page 238.

(13). Peter Truell, ‘False Profits: the Inside Story of BCCI’, Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company, 1992, page 132.

(14). Truell, op. cit., page 132.

(15). Yossi Melman and Dan Raviv, ‘Friends In Deed: Inside the US-Israel Alliance’, New York, Hyperion, 1994, page 380.

(16). Schweitzer, op. cit., pages 131-132.

(17) Anatoliy Golitsyn, The Perestroika Deception, Edward Harle Limited, London and New York: available from the books section of this website [URL: http://www.edwardharle.com“>www.edwardharle.com].

(18) Claire Sterling, Thieves’ World, Simon & Schuster, New York, 1994, page 113.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

THE HEADING FOR THIS REPORT IS CENSORED BY THE NSA

chrisstory

THE LIES HAVE DECAYED AND THE PERPETRATORS ARE IN A PANIC

Friday 17 July 2009 07:00

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

CALLING EVIL GOOD, AND GOOD EVIL
‘Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!’

‘Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!’
Isaiah, Chapter 5, verses 20-21.

‘NONE OF THIS MUST EVER COME OUT’
‘None of this must ever come out, you understand’.
Well, it has.
Gwendolyn Waymark, a Bush Sr. operative, in a voicemail to the Editor in May 2003

• NOTICE TO AMERICANS FACING FORECLOSURE ON THEIR PROPERTIES:
READ THIS AFTER YOU HAVE READ OUR REPORT [ARCHIVE] DATED 26TH DECEMBER 2007.
This development proves the accuracy of the advice given in that report, namely: THE ORIGINAL MORTGAGE DOCUMENTS MUST BE PROVIDED, OR FORECLOSURE CAN BE NIXED BY THE COURTS, AND THERE IS NOTHING THE BANK CAN DO ABOUT IT:

http://foreclosuredefensenationwide.com/?p=144
NEW JERSEY COURT DISMISSES FORECLOSURE FILED BY DEUTSCHE BANK FOR FAILURE
TO PROVIDE DISCOVERY AS TO OWNER AND HOLDER OF NOTE, SECURITIZED TRUST
DOCUMENTS, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS DEMANDED BY BORROWERS

• SUNDAY, 19TH JULY UPDATE: IMPORTANT:
First, about the ‘real bullets will fly’ deadline, which is today, 19th July. This information came from CMKX ‘victims’. However AFTER the information was posted, the Editor was informed by two other sources that this deadline emanates from a very senior level of a certain structure which we can’t go into. It is very serious. There have been discussions for the past 24 hours in the undergrowth as to where this will start: ‘At the top, surely’. NO! Apparently it is to be comprehensive.

Now bear in mind that this kind of thing has been said before. But the situation is beyond critical. In the Second World War, the British finally woke up to the fact that there was a problem after the roof had fallen in and the walls were collapsing on the occupants of the dwelling.

But these criminal forces are different. The roof has caved in because the house is on fire and all the windows have been blown out: AND THEY ARE CARRYING ON SCAMMING REGARDLESS.

According to our information, THE STATES HAVE NOT BEEN PAID BECAUSE THE STIMULUS MONEY HAS NOT BEEN PAID BECAUSE THE SETTLEMENTS HAVE BEEN BLOCKED BY THESE MANIACS, who are intent upon protecting their own positions and, as has been the case all along, couldn’t care less about ordinary American employees and their families.

Employees of certain States, get this, are going to work on the basis of an undertaking that they will be paid. WHAT DOES THIS REMIND YOU OF? Answer: The constant ying-yang ‘promises’ and broken promises and raised and lowered expectations which the 320,000 (390,000) ransacked, scammed and pillaged Ponzi ‘Program’ victims have suffered over the years.

• Only NOW, they are doing it to simple, straightforward, American workers and State employees. They expect these people, who have mortgages to pay, to go to work on a promise?

What is this, a deliberate attempt to trigger blood in the streets?

Our answer to that is: NO! These people are terrified of the likes of US: everyone who is standing up (including especially YOU, reader) against these criminals. It is TRUE that they are more scared of the likes of US than ‘we’ are of them. They are cornered. They have no idea what to do.

ROGUES’ GALLERY WARNING FLUSHES OUT A DECEIVING TRUSTEE
Here’s another interesting development. As you may have noticed, we have published a ROGUES’ GALLERY warning, the point being that we will expose every single deceiving, conniving piece of work who has deceived us since we started reporting on these matters.

About three years ago, a Trustee started sending the Editor almost daily emails, giving ‘informed’ information about pending settlement arrangements. A ‘High Functionary’ had told him this, his associate in Europe was promising that, he was all set to go into the bank, he’d heard nothing all day, last week was a washout, but he understood that payment will be made this week, and so on and so forth. All this claptrap was rounded off with ‘God Bless’, because their profile of the Editor is someone who reads Scripture, and they think that Christians are thoroughly wet and easily conned.

Well, guess what? Since we posted the ROGUES’ GALLERY WARNING, this false (and of course ANONYMOUS) correspondent has VANISHED INTO THIN AIR. Doesn’t want to be exposed, you see. Trouble, is, we know who he is, where he is, who he works for, and that he and other snakes have been creaming funds off the top of trades for the uber-gangsters ALL THE WAY THROUGH.

It’s all blowing ‘as we speak’. This will become clear for all to see. It’s taken a long time, but the only way forward is for the entire edifice of corruption to be torn down. And that’s what will happen.

One other point: May we remind you that this is an INTERNATIONAL CRISIS, not simply an American crisis. Therefore, this is not a matter of national security: it’s a matter of global public interest, and these investigations are the legitimate focus of attention for an international financial journal. Our job is to provide our subscribers with ‘value-added’ financial intelligence. That’s what we try to do.

• PLEASE ALSO READ THIS IMPORTANT NOTICE BEFORE YOU GO ANY FURTHER:

The main heading of this report was intended to be:
9/11 MASS MURDER BY THREE CRIMINAL U.S. PRESIDENTS

• But it is blocked by the intrusive NSA censors. The entire report could not be posted with this heading. But when we amended the heading to read: THE HEADING FOR THIS REPORT IS CENSORED BY THE NSA… as above… we were able to post it.

• THIS, everyone, provides the whole world with a potent indication that ‘9/11 MASS MURDER BY THREE CRIMINAL U.S. PRESIDENTS’ is the APPROPRIATE heading for this report, and that the statement it contains is TRUE [as is revealed in the text below].

• PAYEE LIST REDEFINED TO INCLUDE NEUTRAL LINE ITEM PAYMENT: SEE BELOW

• THE VREELAND INFORMATION IN THIS REPORT IS UPDATED: HE’LL BE RELEASED IN 2124.

• ‘REAL BULLETS START FLYING AFTER 19TH JULY’: CMKX:
The Editor was advised at 2.15pm UK time on 18th July that CMKX people have a deadline of 19th July (Sunday) for ‘satisfaction’, after which quote ‘real bullets will start flying’ unquote. The bullets in question will, we presume, not be fired by enforcement team operatives on the ground who are still, as far as we are aware, engaged in enforcing the World Court-issued Writ of Execution, but by other parties with an interest in the ‘rectification of past wrongs’. Certainly, one has the impression, too, that the giga-criminal operatives know that the game is up, and may be engaged in ransacking the accounts (or trying to), including reverting to their stealing from the Social Security Trust Fund accounts, which they were doing at least two years ago.

A FOREIGN RANSACKING OPERATION AGAINST THE UNITED STATES?
One of their problems is that they have to ‘replace’ what they have stolen from the Government’s accounts, and they can’t, because they are being forced by the pressure of the exposures to pay out the Settlements, according to our ‘special’ information.

Obviously, the Bush-DVD Criminal Syndicate hasn’t just raped US investors alone: it has certainly ransacked the Federal Government’s accounts, as well. Such pillaging would be consistent with a foreign-controlled revenge operation, and the primary suspects would be Germany and the covert Soviet Union. And that might well help to explain why the STASI/DVD operative, Chancellor Angela Merkel, is currently painting herself ‘whiter than white’, demanding that Wall Street and the City of London are put in their place, while also conveniently papering over the uncomfortable reality, for public consumption purposes, that Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank are George H. W. Bush Sr.’s Fraudulent Finance hidey-holes, too (and that she, this ‘financial reformer’ is or has long been the recipient of Bush Sr.’s bribes, as previously reported).

• INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW: Volume 34, Numbers 3 & 4: Comprehensive coverage of the twists and turns of this crisis between September 2008 and June 2009, containing details of many of the astonishing goings-on in the lawless space called the intergovernmental sector.

• In this ‘Black’ arena, ‘anything goes’, assets of other parties are stolen and traded, deception is standard practice, and everyone lies to everyone else. This huge issue, currently ‘on machine’,
provides a devastating record and critique of the deplorable behaviour of the Big Powers, as they fight over stolen money. Please apply via the CONTACT US facility for availability and price details.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice are comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor’s study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing global financial corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Just press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

• The Editor’s $35,000 Wanta bail-out money has been stolen.

• See the second white panel for details of our latest distributed intelligence publications.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

• COPYRIGHT NOTICE: The Editor and his companies have taken measures to obtain protection and recompense for the gross breaches of copyright material, books and works owned by this service, our companies, the Editor and Author, and the Authors whose interests we must protect. In the first place, a pirate platform service in the United States has received a demand for a very large sum of money to compensate us for the wanton stealing of three of our books, the consequence of which barbaric acts has been effectively to destroy our book publishing business. Secondly, the agents for the Google Settlement have been specifically informed by registered mail that we have written, also by registered mail, to the four universities and one public library who have entered into an agreement with Google under the so-called ‘Google Settlement’.

The universities in question are: Oxford, Stanford, Harvard and Michigan; and the public library is the New York Public Library. Our three companies have opted out of the Google Settlement, which is anyway now in some disarray.

These and related parties have been advised that if ANY of our works, published by all three of our companies, not just the intelligence books company which has already been severely ransacked, are assaulted by copyright pirates, we will take all legal measures open to us to enforce our rights and those of our authors. The rationale underlying this scourge is the false and spurious one that the intellectual property of the whole of humanity is the property of the ‘global commons’: a dirty, revolutionary piece of hypocrisy and subversion, the underlying purpose of which is to destroy small publishers so that there will be no dissenting voices to The New Underworld Order.

When time permits, we will be providing ‘further and better particulars’ concerning this outrageous revolutionary development. In the meantime, those amoral persons and parties who have so far downloaded our works are hereby warned that every single download will be traced, and that they risk being pursued for very large damages for gross and insolent breaches of our copyright.

Anyone wishing to reproduce the important anti-World Revolution article posted here must contact the Editor for written permission, on the understanding that a precise form of words that we will specify must accompany any reposting and that the entire article, with credits, must be displayed. Any deviation will be treated as a breach of copyright and dealt with accordingly [see above].

• ROGUE’S GALLERY OF DECEIVERS: Given the deceit and abuse that has been meted out to the Editor of this service since we began these investigations in 2002, the Editor plans to expose, by name, each of the primary perpetrators of deception against us, including a UK-based deceiver recently unmasked who sought to extort money for delivering sensitive packages that he never delivered. This character has been reported to the Police, and a Major Crime Book Number will be sought with a request for an investigation. The relevant documents have been sent by registered and signed-for mail, to the Special Branch officer concerned. Those who have deceived us will be made to endure the grave consequences of their serial duplicity, starting with Leo Wanta, to whom the Editor lent $35,000 to pay for his release from irregular probation, which should have been paid back on 11th June 2007 but concerning which nothing has been heard. All other collaborators and operatives who tried to deceive us at various stages will also be exposed for their deception.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and our ‘politically incorrect’ intelligence books online from this website.

• NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

• THE STENCH OF ROTTING HUMAN FLESH IN MIDTOWN MANHATTAN

• THE INITIAL WANTA CAMPAIGN USING THE EDITOR’S PLATFORM

• DEEP LIES DISLODGED BY THE CAMPAIGN

• PAULSON SEIZES CONTROL OF THE ‘WANTA FUNDS’

• THE METHODOLOGY OF WADING THROUGH A DECEPTION MINEFIELD

• WANTA: ‘YOU ARE AN HONEST JOURNALIST, WHICH IS EXTREMELY RARE’

• ‘WALKING IN A STRAIGHT LINE’

• THE EDITOR ACCUMULATES A LARGE FILE OF DOCUMENTS

• THE ‘LINE’ THAT THE WANTA ACCOUNTS HELD SOVIET SPOIL

• REALITY: WANTA AS BUSH’S DE FACTO (DOUBLE-CROSSED) ‘BAGMAN’

• MARC RICH (HANS BRAND) AND GWENDOLYN WAYMARK

• THE EDITOR’S LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY

• WANTA SUDDENLY TRAVELS TO CALIFORNIA

• WANTA AND MADOFF: OUTLETS FOR BUSH CRIME SYNDICATE MONIES

• INFORMATION IN THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

• GOODWIN DID NOT FORWARD COURT DOCUMENTS TO WANTA

• BUSH SR. WAS ‘UPSTAIRS’: SO WANTA’S PARTY WERE KICKED OUT
OF CITIBANK’S MIDTOWN OFFICES BY ARMED NYPD AGENTS

• THE ‘FUNNY BUSINESS’ AT THE ALEXANDRIA COURTHOUSE

• HOW THE PETITION WAS EXPLOITED FOR DECEPTION PURPOSES

• AN ‘ANOMALY’ IN THE TEXT OF THE PETITION

• DECEPTION EXPERT DOUBLE-CROSSED BY DECEPTION EXPERTS

• MONEY STOLEN FROM PETER IN ORDER NOT TO PAY PAUL

• CORRUPT U.S. GOVERNMENT RAPES, MURDERS AND PILLAGES ITS OWN PEOPLE

• CURIOUS ’INTERCHANGEABILITY’ OF U.S. ‘INTELLIGENCE’ ACCOUNTS

• WANTA RELEASED FROM JAIL IMMEDIATELY AFTER 9/11

• JAILED TO PREVENT WANTA FROM LEAKING 9/11 PLOT IN ADVANCE

• OUR DEDUCTION ABOUT THE ACCOUNTS IS CONFIRMED

• PROOF THAT 9/11 WAS MASS MURDER BY THREE PRESIDENTS

• VREELAND DID PREDICT THE 9/11 ABOMINATIONS

• OUR WARNING ABORTED A NUCLEAR EXPLOSION

• PLANNING A NUKE EXPLOSION TO AVOID PAYING WANTA?

• TWIN CITIES PREDICTION JUDGED TO BE ACCURATE, TOO

• CHENEY AND STRUCTURES WORKING OVERTIME TO STOP ‘IT ALL COMING OUT’

• NEW COORDINATED 9/11 LEAKS BY ‘LICENSED’ U.S. AGENTS

• BITTER FEUDING OVER THE MONEY BY RIVAL INTEL FACTIONS

• WHOEVER WINS ELECTIONS, THE CIA/NSC ALWAYS WINS

• THE RULE OF LAW SOLUTION WILL PREVAIL: ‘SET IN STONE’

• DEVELOPING U.S. MILITARY CRISIS OVER OBAMA’S STATUS

• BANKS REFUSE TO HONOUR CALIFORNIA I.O.U.s

• THE GHANA EPISODE, PLUS: OBAMA ‘WANTS HIS CUT’

• WARRING INTEL GROUPS FURIOUS BUT IMPOTENT

• OUR THINKING ON DERIVATIVES GOES ‘MAINSTREAM’

• WARNING BY WORLD BANK’S CHIEF ECONOMIST

• GEITHNER’S ‘STANDARDISED CONTRACT’ RED HERRING

• REARGUARD OPERATION TO ‘RESCUE’ FRAUDULENT FINANCE

• DISLOCATIONS ARE DUE EXCLUSIVELY TO CORRUPTION AND FRAUD

• AUTOMATON WHITE HOUSE KEEPS ON ‘KICKING AGAINST THE PRICKS’

• PAYEE LIST REDEFINED TO INCLUDE A KEY ‘LINE ITEM PAYMENT’

• LAST-MINUTE SCAMMING OPERATIONS BY THE CROOKS

• EXCERPTS FROM A CRUCIAL AFFIDAVIT

• READ OUR SEPTEMBER 2006 PREDICTION OF THE PRESENT SITUATION IN NOTE (5) BELOW

• Relevant Notes containing extensive reference data:

(1) Extracts from a timeline analysis of the background to the Criminal Finance Crisis associated with the Editor’s personal involvement: Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 3 & 4, pages 3-25: July 2009.

(2) Banks identified by the Editor of this service from open domain documents that we retain, as holding ‘Wanta’ (‘Bush Crime Syndicate’) illicit funds (which, when ‘accepted’ by US authority, are ‘laundered via the sovereign’ and thereby legitimised).

(3) CIA proprietary US Government intelligence corporations, with which Leo Wanta was connected.

(5) Excerpts from our prediction of what would happen if the Refunding Programme (previously labelled by us ‘The Wanta Plan’) were not to be implemented expeditiously: published first on 2nd September 2006 and again on 3rd-4th December 2006 [see this website’s Archive for those dates]. Source: International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 1 & 2, pages 299-302 [Third Quarter 2007]. For this presentation, the phrase ‘The Wanta Plan’ (which, like ‘Wantagate’, we invented) is replaced by ‘The G-7-Approved Refunding Plan’.

THE STENCH OF ROTTING HUMAN FLESH IN MIDTOWN MANHATTAN
We are now approaching the eighth anniversary of the preplanned mass murder by three conniving Criminal Presidents of the United States and their lackeys of over 3,000 people in the Twin Towers on 11th September 2001. As has been stated in earlier reports, public lies are like plutonium: they have a half-life and in the experience of this Editor, the average lifespan of an official lie is about seven years. So one would expect the 9/11 lies to be shaky by now.

It is therefore no surprise that the lies surrounding 9/11 have decayed to the point when they are poised to blow the entire conspiracy into the air, with devastating consequences for all concerned, who thought they had ‘got away with it’.

When the Editor himself recovered from the shock (his youngest daughter narrowly missed being caught in the Twin Towers on the morning of this ‘Reichstag Fire’ abomination), he returned in late October 2001 to our Midtown Office, which was covered in a thin film of grey filth, and took hours to clean. The carpet in our small apartment was so filthy that it eventually had to be discarded. And the stench of rotting human flesh permeated the entire Midtown area permanently.

As a ‘visitor’, the Editor noticed the stench all the time, but he was also aware that New Yorkers appeared to have got used to it. When the Editor returned to New York City in February 2002, the stench of rotting human flesh was less evident, depending on the direction of the wind from the downtown area. There were days when it was unchanged from the situation prevailing in late October, and days when it was less or not noticeable.

In order not to hold up the following narrative, a basic timeline describing the background to the Editor’s involvement in these investigations is appended below as Note (1). This text, expanded, is to be published in Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 3 & 4, in production.

THE INITIAL WANTA CAMPAIGN USING THE EDITOR’S PLATFORM
It will be recalled that, having provided (as explained again in the timeline) $35,000 of our scarce private financing (obtained from the proceeds of a satisfactory private house sale) to pay for the shortening of Leo/Lee Wanta’s probation after his incarceration on what appeared to be trumped-up charges (like not paying $14,129 in Wisconsin State tax which we have proved from documents we hold and have published, that he paid twice over, in May and June 1992 – and which the Editor’s private funds paid a third time on 21st July 2005, with interest: see website report dated 6th August 2007 for comprehensive details), the Editor’s website and publishing platform became, with Leo Wanta’s enthusiastic agreement and on his instructions as confirmed by numerous faxed cover sheets addressed by Wanta to Prof. Christopher Story FRSA – USA Ops. sent to us with detailed information for publication on this website, the vehicle for a de facto exposure operation intended to procure the fulfilment of compensation arrangements for Wanta.

DEEP LIES DISLODGED BY THE CAMPAIGN
As this de facto campaign developed momentum, the rickety scaffolding propping up the inverted pyramid of official lies surrounding 9/11 and its underlying motivations, began to disintegrate.

The ‘Black’ inspirations for this long-planned (see below) abomination included covering up the stealing of unbelievably colossal sums of money and gold, the destruction of ‘Structured Products’ contracts, and providing the pretext to enable the Bush-CIA-DVD Financial Criminal Syndicate to attack Afghanistan for geo-energy reasons and to invade Iraq so that, to begin with, the Central Bank of Iraq, holding the counterparty assets, cash, gold, instruments, contracts and printing plates amassed by Bush Sr.’s former financial partner, Saddam Hussein, could be ransacked.

PAULSON SEIZES CONTROL OF THE ‘WANTA FUNDS’
What happened was that after Bush II had removed John Snow as Treasury Secretary and had replaced him with the criminal operative Henry M. Paulson Jr., the former Goldman Sachs CEO, the funds sent over by the People’s Bank of China (after having been released, we speculate, on the signature of Howie Kwong Kok, Wanta’s Chinese ‘partner’), ostensibly as Wanta’s ‘compensation’, were removed from the recipient institution, Bank of America, Richmond, VA, and, under Paulson’s sole signature, were lodged with Paulson’s ‘former’ institution, Goldman Sachs, placing them under contract for one year in June 2006, according to our best information and belief. This gave rise to our repeated description of Paulson as Henry M. ‘Conflict-of-Interest’ Paulson, a cognomen that understandably got up his nose, as was intended.

It will also be recalled that the CIA had lied for some years that Wanta was dead, just as they lied that Howie Kwong Kok had died from ingesting rat poison in Singapore, not long after a visit to Singapore by George H. W. Bush Sr., in 1993.

THE METHODOLOGY OF WADING THROUGH A DECEPTION MINEFIELD
Here we must interpolate an important consideration about our methodology. When investigating tangled webs of deception, the investigative journalist must be on guard at all times that he is not himself deceived, double-crossed, led up garden paths and otherwise subjected to the standard barrage of ‘Black’ tools deployed by the corrupted intelligence community, for which deception is standard procedure. Recall the classic observation of Gordon Thomas (with his MI6 and Mossad connections, about which he boasts) when the Editor tackled him in 2004-05 about the lies that he said MI6 had fed to the British press about the Editor of this service, in order to ensure that the gullible ‘mainstream’ wouldn’t take what they knew we were likely to publish (i.e. exposure of the colossal financial thefts), seriously:

‘It doesn’t matter that it’s not true. All that matters is that it’s out there’.

(In uttering this classic put-down, Gordon Thomas thereby destroyed the credibility of his entire life’s published works, including his history of Mossad: but that’s a diversion here).

WANTA: ‘YOU ARE AN HONEST JOURNALIST, WHICH IS EXTREMELY RARE’
Anyway, what we would like to insert at this point is the following clarification. In ‘assisting’ Wanta and exposing what we did between June 2006 and March 2008, the Editor and those associated with him walked in a straight line. By this we imply that any ‘honest journalist, which is extremely rare’, which was Wanta’s flattering description of this Editor, has to pursue leads which, ‘to the best of his knowledge and belief at the time’ are accurate; and as is well known, journalists are allowed some leeway, since the Fourth Estate (in our case the Fourth and the Fifth Estates) is required to do its job to hold the Executive and other branches of authority to account.

Therefore, bearing in mind this responsibility, and also the fact that one is on guard at all times against the likelihood of being deceived, one does one’s best to avoid falling into traps carefully set by devious, cynical, scheming ‘Black’ intelligence community operatives who care nothing for individuals, but only for whatever sordid agendas they happen to be juggling at given moment.

‘WALKING IN A STRAIGHT LINE’
Nevertheless, despite taking all possible precautions, one cannot be sure that one is not being lied to. The Editor knew that Wanta was a consummate deceiver, but used his discernment to identify what he thought was the genuine person behind the multiple complex tradecraft masks deception behaviour for which he was known. The Editor did not know that he had accepted funds from other parties and had never paid them back, just as he took our $35,000 on the basis of a two-year loan at 7.0%, repayable on 11th June 2007, and has not paid us a penny.

(Likewise he never paid Michael C. Cottrell anything after he had been forced to spend $14,000 on hotel accommodation etc during the 40 days during October and November 2007 when they were seeking settlement from the duplicitous Citibank in Midtown Manhattan).

If he had had any manners, Wanta, who typically answers the telephone in German (‘Guten Tag’) should at least have written to say that he was not in a position to pay the money back, but would do so when he could – which would have been an appropriate small gesture. Instead of which, he did nothing; while his Düsseldorf-born (CIA approved) lawyer, Steve Goodwin, of Richmond, VA, who drew up the loan documentation, should have taken appropriate action to address the situation.

• As he failed to do so, he is a co-conspirator in the stealing of the Editor’s funds plus interest.

Now as you will recall, after what Wanta described as a kangaroo court trial, Wanta was imprisoned for a prolonged period in 1995. He had fallen out with George Bush Sr., who falls out with everyone he deals with (‘bait and switch’): indeed double-cross is Bush Sr.’s standard modus operandi.

The falling-out with Bush Sr. centred around the colossal volume of offshore (Executive Order 12333) corporations and accounts containing vast sums of ‘Bush’ money handled.

THE EDITOR ACCUMULATES A LARGE FILE OF DOCUMENTS
Since, by 2006-07, the Editor had accumulated a very large portfolio of bank documents that had been leaked into the (obscure) public domain, inter alia by the subsequently incarcerated Office of Naval Intelligence Operative Delmart Mark Vreeland [see timeline in Note (1) below], he extracted details of these accounts from the documents in a systematic manner, and also compiled a list of the banks holding these accounts, which is re-appended as Note (2) below.

This list has been published both on this website and in International Currency Review, so it is on record all over the world, in places ‘where it matters’.

Readers are further reminded that, in the public interest, a colossal volume of documentary evidence of this systematic financial corruption involving the holders of the US highest offices, and others, has been published in successive issues of International Currency Review.

This means that Governments, Treasuries, international financial institutions, Central Banks, large financial institutions, intelligence agencies, military establishments and other interested parties all over the world have copies of these banking documents (a considerable proportion of which are reproduced in facsimile format, as well as being the subject of very extensive ongoing narrative commentaries) either sitting on bookshelves, accessible in their libraries, or otherwise held in archives. There is therefore no excuse whatsoever for the Governments and the central banks concerned – which we could name – disregarding the record which we have made available in the public interest, just as this report is proffered in the public interest.

THE ‘LINE’ THAT THE WANTA ACCOUNTS HELD SOVIET SPOIL
As the Editor and Publisher of Soviet Analyst, the Editor was a ready recipient of the ‘line’ that the colossal number of bank accounts ostensibly in Wanta’s corporate portfolio, and from which he was separated when he was arrested in Lausanne on 7th June 1993, represented accounts which held inter alia, if not mainly, the proceeds of the Financial Warfare operations that had reportedly been masterminded by Howie Kwong Kok and Wanta on the instructions of President Ronald Reagan as set out in three specific Executive Orders requiring the ‘Evil Empire’ to be brought to an end. As Wanta put it to the Editor once, Reagan ‘thought the stand-off with the Soviet Union was pointless’ and should be terminated.

REALITY: WANTA AS BUSH’S DE FACTO (DOUBLE-CROSSED) ‘BAGMAN’
But in the light of greater knowledge, deeper understanding and hard experience, the Editor reached the conclusion some time ago that the story about these offshore corporate accounts having been established to hold the proceeds of the ransacking of the Soviet Union, is false, or rather ‘economical with the truth’. It is another deception, and Wanta is party to that deception.

On the contrary, the bank accounts which we publicised in detail, giving the identities of the banks used for the purpose, represented a considerable proportion of the offshore bank accounts used by George Bush inter alia to hide the proceeds of the Bush-CIA-DVD Crime Syndicate’s massive assault on the funds of others – a theft-fest concerning which Bush Sr. uttered the notorious comment: ‘If the American people knew what we had done, they’d string us up on lamp posts’.

Well, the American people today, who are among the most intelligent on earth (as they received the best brains from Europe and elsewhere) are pretty sure what these unspeakable US criminals have done, but have not yet found a way to ensure that the criminal gangs that have been controlling the United States at the very highest levels for the past several ‘Black’ Presidencies receive the overdue decisive punishments that they deserve and that are pending. We doubt whether the dam will hold much longer, as the half-life of the supporting lies has decayed beyond their ‘expiry dates’.

MARC RICH (HANS BRAND) AND GWENDOLYN WAYMARK
Most public and intelligence sector lies contain elements of truth: so to say that the bank accounts did not include the proceeds of the wholesale ransacking of the Soviet State economy would be completely untrue, especially given the known involvement of Zug, Switzerland-based intermediary Marc Rich, exposed by this service as the long-range German DVD operative Hans Brand [refer to International Currency Review, Volume 31, Numbers 3 & 4, pages 83-96, with facsimile documents (Fourth Quarter 2006)]: indeed we have ourselves deconstructed a number of such bank account transactions, having for instance identified the Bush operative Gwendolyn Ann Waymark as named beneficiary of a Pay Order fee instruction by a Mr Paul M. Bauer arising from currency exchange of 18.699 billion Soviet Roubles, of $4,721,969.70, for account of Gwendolyn Ann Waymark and Diane M. Waymark with Bank of Massachusetts, East Long Meadow Branch, associated with the forged Status-Credit-Bank, Moscow, documents referencing the Executive Order 12333 corporation Asian Europe Development Pte. Ltd., sent to us unsolicted by Fedex on 10th September 2007. We were able to compare these documents with Status-Credit-Bank documents that we hold on file, proving the US forgery and thefts. In the same batch, Daniel Reis was to receive a commission from the stolen Russian monies, of $20,237,012.99 [see International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 3 & 4, pages 288-294 (Second Quarter 2008)], with facsimiles that prove out this forensic research.

However it is now clear that Leo Wanta was for a time a or THE guardian of ‘Bush Sr.’s accounts’, meaning offshore accounts holding stashes of stolen monies which Bush Sr. claimed belonged to him: which specifically explains why we have repeatedly heard, from the underground, that ‘Bush Sr. says the money is his’.

THE EDITOR’S LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY
These, then, are the funds which Wanta stated he was engaged in repatriating, having instructed Steve Goodwin to prepare a Power of Attorney (which the Editor had requested to be restricted specifically to information gathering) enabling the Editor, with Goodwin, to appear at Coutts Bank in April 1986 to conduct certain investigations on behalf of Wanta; and to enable the Editor to attend, which he did, at Lloyds Bank TSB, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire in late April 2006 – when he was told by the bank manager that the accounts held there in the names of specific Executive Order 12333 corporations listed on the Power of Attorney had been shifted into the PERSONAL name of Jan Morton Heger, one of Wanta’s CIA Attorneys.

WANTA SUDDENLY TRAVELS TO CALIFORNIA
Following these developments, Wanta, who was now able to travel outside Wisconsin thanks to the Editor’s funds having been applied to pay for his ‘restitution’ (and the third illegal payment of the $14,129 plus interest) so that Wanta’s probation was shortened by five years and two weeks as a consequence – suddenly disappeared out to California where he was prevailed upon to accept the ‘compromise’ ostensible remuneration package which was later associated with the visit to Beijing of Bush Sr.’s chief criminal financier, Dr Alan Greenspan, and the subsequently ousted US Treasury Secretary, John Snow.

It is believed that the California visit was specifically precipitated by the aborted investigations at Coutts, London, and Lloyds Bank which Wanta instructed the Editor of this service to pursue, as well as being driven by a conference call to Coutts Bank from Goodwin’s office in Richmond, VA, in March 2006, which instead of being taken by Mrs Burgess whom the Editor knew, was taken by a Mr Robertson, who said that Coutts had no banking relationship with Leo Wanta.

No. They had a banking relationship with George H. W. Bush Sr.

WANTA AND MADOFF: OUTLETS FOR BUSH CRIME SYNDICATE MONIES
The Bush Crime Syndicate, of course, had multiple outlets for the stealing, placement, distribution, and laundering of the vast flow of hijacked funds that it handled, of which the Madoff enterprise was one – a point that needs to be borne in mind, so that the moribund Wanta situation is seen in its proper perspective. On 9th July 2009, it was reported that Irving Picard, the Trustee appointed by the Manhattan Court to take charge of identifying assets to compensate the victims, had stated that his investigations had ‘unearthed a labyrinth of interrelated international funds, institutions and entities of almost unparalleled complexity and breadth’.

Specifically, Mr Picard revealed that stolen assets had been identified in Britain, Ireland, France, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Spain, Gibraltar, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands and the Bahamas. Mr Picard has despatched more than 230 subpoenas seeking overseas records and has received more than 15,400 claims against Madoff and his defunct Ponzi network. As in the case of the ‘Wanta’ accounts, the funds that Mr Picard is chasing are in fact ‘Bush Crime Syndicate’ funds, as Madoff was used as a key conduit for the dispersion of stolen funds (in accordance with the classic Ponzi model).

INFORMATION IN THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Wanta’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia [Civil Action No.: 1 – 07 CV 609] faxed to the Editor on 22nd June 2007 at 06:04pm UK time, and which was published in facsimile format in International Currency Review Volume 33, Numbers 3 & 4, pages 67-79 [Second Quarter 2008] states inter alia:

13: In May of 2006 the People’s Republic of China caused a free and unrestricted transfer of $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars through international bank fund transfer facilities to an account at Bank of America located at Richmond, Virginia. The designated beneficiary of the transferred funds from the People’s Republic of China was Petitioner herein [Wanta – Ed]. This transfer was made by the People’s Republic of China solely and exclusively as a requirement under the mentioned settlement agreement.

14: Upon best information and belief between the dates of July 31st to August 2nd of 2006 the United States Department of the Treasury, without authorization of either the remitting party or the receiving party removed the People’s Republic of China transferred financial assets from Bank of America, Richmond, Virginia, to an account in the name of Goldman Sachs at CITIBank New York, New York, as the beneficiary holder of the monies transferred by the People’s Republic of China referenced above. This “Chip” (Clearing House Interbank Payment) transfer was facilitated from Virginia domiciled banks to New York domiciled banks via the Federal Reserve Bank Richmond*].

[This was INCORRECT. The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond at once made it clear that they had nothing to do with it and that Wanta should file suit in the Southern District of New York, meaning that the funds were transferred from Virginia via the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, of which Timothy Geithner was the President. Therefore, self-evidently, Mr Geithner has always been fully cognisant of this dimension of the scandal, which means that Geithner is deeply compromised].

The Chip transfer did not remove the name of [the] Petitioner as the intended recipient of the transferred money from the People’s Republic of China. The transfer to the Goldman Sachs et al. account at CITIBank put a lawless restriction that the funds were not to be released to Petitioner without the authorization of [the] United States Treasury. At or about the time of [the] unauthorized transfer mentioned in this paragraph 14 Petitioner protested the alleged right of “entitlement” by Secretary Paulson, and to facilitate protest or right of ownership under the [US] “Securities Acts” accounts were opened in the name of AmeriTrust Groupe at Morgan Stanley, fiduciary account at CITIBank/NYC to receive direct deposit transfer of Petitioner funds from Goldman Sachs’.

[Note: These accounts were opened on the basis of the securities market qualifications of Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., who was then still serving as the Treasurer and Executive Vice President of Wanta’s Commonwealth of Virginia-based corporation. Mr Wanta had neither the securities market qualifications nor the legal status to open any accounts, let alone a securities market account – as he remained a felon (a state of affairs that the Editor attempted to alleviate by sending a Misprision of Felony letter on 17th October 2007 to Wisconsin State Judge James Martin, drawing the Judge’s attention again to the gross irregularities perpetrated by the Wisconsin Department of Corrections summarised in our website report dated 6th August 2007, and suggesting that the State Court might consider removing Leo Wanta’s felonious status as he had 100% fulfilled the Court’s ‘restitution’ requirements (using the Editor’s funds, now stolen [see website Archive report dated 27th October 2007]. This was the Editor’s final attempt to help Wanta over his Wisconsin probation issues).

[Wanta later claimed that he would operate with bank accounts only and erroneously stated that Mr Cottrell had required his corporation to operate a securities market account in order for Michael Cottrell be able to control Wanta’s affairs – whereas the reason for the securities account was to protect assets, since funds held in corrupted US banks are liable to be stolen, whereas clients’ assets held in US securities market accounts do not form part of the assets of the broker/dealer institution, and so are much safer in this free-for-all US financial environment].

The Petition for a Writ of Mandamus continued:

15: The Petitioner has been contacted by “Compliance Officers” that are contract employees of the United States Department of the Treasury that the transfer records of the US Department of the Treasury and the recipient (past and present holder of the funds transferred to Petitioner by the People’s Bank of China) reflect that the accounts opened to receive the financial assets are tagged and coded for the benefit of Petitioner. Access to the tagged and coded accounts requires lawless authorization to be provided in writing by Secretary Paulson. To date Secretary Paulson refuses to provide the required written authorization to the compliance officers. In addition one or more compliance officer (referenced herein) has been contacted by Secret Service Agents who have advised the compliance officers that the “White House” ordered that the compliance officers cease and desist from communicating in any manner with Petitioner.

16: Upon best information and belief the compliance officers mentioned in paragraph 15 have been in contact with law enforcement officers representing the Central Intelligence Agency [CIA] and the United States Department of Defense. These mentioned law enforcement officers confirm that the information provided by the compliance officers is true and correct and that upon best information and belief the “order” preventing Secretary Paulson from releasing the “tagged and coded” funds that are the sole and exclusive property of the Petitioner [Wanta] have been either lawlessly and individually controlled by Secretary Paulson and/or restricted through direct participation by other United States of America elected and/or nominated officials.

17: Upon best information and belief Troutman Sanders, LLP, and Jenkins & Gilchrist Parker Chapin LLP, seeking legal recourse on behalf of C.B.I.C. Inc. (Mr William Bonney Sr.) and the People’s Republic of China, obtained an Order to Show Cause Why a Writ of Mandamus Should Not Be Issued from the United States Supreme Court signed by Justice Ginsberg.

The People’s Republic of China, as a foreign Government, invoked the original jurisdiction authority of the United States Supreme Court to obtain the document signed by Justice Ginsberg. Upon further best information and belief the responding parties to the action files in the United States Supreme Court are exercising any and all assumed defenses to ward off the issuance of the Writ of Mandamus.

18: The United States Department of Justice and/or any agency or investigative authority contacted has refused to assist the Petitioner in the collection of lawful funds. [The] said parties refuse such assistance irrespective that there is clear and undisputed evidence that the subject funds are identified in official United States Government agency documents as being the sole and exclusive property of Petitioner. As of the date of the filing of this Petition, all requests for payment of lawful funds have been ignored by any and all elected and nominated public officials that have the implied and apparent authority to complete all requirements of the settlement documents.

GOODWIN DID NOT FORWARD COURT DOCUMENTS TO WANTA
The Defendants – Henry M. Paulson, Jr., Secretary of the US Treasury; Robert M. Kimmit, Deputy Secretary of the Treasury, James R. Wilkinson, Treasury Chief of Staff, Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Alberto R. Gonzales, US Attorney General, and the US Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond – obtained 60 days’ leave to respond rather than the usual 30 days. During this period, Court documents addressed to Mr Wanta sent to the AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. address at Attorney Steven Goodwin’s Richmond office, were not forwarded to Wanta (sabotage?).

A hearing on the Petition was scheduled for 19th October 2007 in the Alexandria Court, which was attended by the Editor of this service, Colonel Dana Wilcox, Michael C. Cottrell (who was then, as indicated above, still Treasurer and Executive Vice President of Wanta’s corporation) and Wanta. Goodwin did not attend but submitted an extraordinary notarised Affidavit in which he attempted to explain away the fact that his office had not sent the relevant documents to Wanta inter alia using the following language [International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 3 & 4, pages 345-346]:

‘I am the registered agent for AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.

My Staff obtains the mail at 5516 Falmouth Street, Suite 108, Richmond, Virginia 23230 and distributes the mail within the firm daily.

Mr Wanta had advised me that he had filed action in Federal Court in Alexandria and advised that mail pertaining to that case may be coming to the office.

No one from my staff has made me aware of any mail from the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond received on behalf of Mr Wanta or AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., in the matter of Wanta V. Paulson, et al.

I am aware that my office has received mail from the United States Attorney’s Office on behalf of Mr Wanta and/or AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. in the matter of Wanta, et al, v. Paulson, et al.’.

THE ‘FUNNY BUSINESS’ AT THE ALEXANDRIA COURTHOUSE
Thus, ‘whether intentionally or not’, receipt of relevant Court documents by Wanta during the 60-day period was neutralised by the office of Düsseldorf-born Attorney Steven Goodwin. Meanwhile, when Mr Wanta’s case was finally called, in the further hearing on 19th October 2007, before His Honor T. Selby Ellis III, born in Bogotà, Colombia (educated in law at Oxford University, who was appointed by President Reagan in 1987, has flown F4 Phantom warplanes off aircraft carriers, may be an Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) operative and is a former partner of the well-known CIA legal outfit Hunton and Williams, based in Washington DC), Wanta made an ass of himself on the podium, waving his arms around in a curious fashion; and essentially, Judge Ellis paid no attention to him whatsoever. On the contrary, on our return from the lunch break, Ellis suddenly stopped the proceedings, exited from the Courtroom, and returned some minutes later, having, we speculate, taken a call from a senior level in Washington (the Treasury or the White House). He proceeded to read aloud his pre-prepared conclusions which did not assist Wanta in the slightest.

Yet when we left the Courthouse and in the lobby, Wanta did not appear to be in the least disturbed at this development, which puzzled the Editor at the time. But no longer.

BUSH SR. WAS ‘UPSTAIRS’: SO WANTA’S PARTY WERE KICKED OUT
OF CITIBANK’S MIDTOWN OFFICES BY ARMED NYPD AGENTS
On 20th November 2007, as revisited in the timeline under Note (1) below, Wanta, Mr Cottrell and a third party appeared at Mr Cottrell’s request and by the bank’s invitation at the Midtown premises of Citibank for an appointment concerning the failure of the bank to remit the $4.5 trillion amount to Wanta/his corporation. Although Wanta had, during the 40-day stay in hotels in Alexandria and on Staten Island, told Michael Cottrell that ‘we must dispense with Christopher Story’s services, but don’t tell him’, the Editor was called twice in London while the party were languishing in Citibank’s lobby, after Wanta had instructed Cottrell to ‘Call Chris’.

• This ‘became necessary’ after two armed New York Police Department Officers appeared in the lobby and ordered the Wanta party off the premises.

Mr Michael C. Cottrell had requested access to senior Citibank personnel in conformity with the invitation. It transpired that Mr George H. W. Bush Sr. was present on the Directors’ floor of the building at the time, which was why a gigantic black stretched limousine with tinted windows was parked outside the bank’s Midtown Office. No doubt it was George Bush Sr. who had urged Citibank to kick the Wanta party off its premises under pain of NYPD armed arrest.

Recall now our basic comments about deception, at the beginning of this report. Recall also that Wanta had fallen out with Bush and had been incarcerated on trumped-up charges (see e.g. our report on ‘Wisconsingate’ dated 6th August 2007: website Archive). Recall further that Bush Sr.’s standard devilish modus operandi is always ‘bait and switch’, or the double-cross.

• Do not be in any way surprised, therefore, that these people lie to and double-cross each other all the time: that’s what they DO.

HOW THE PETITION WAS EXPLOITED FOR DECEPTION PURPOSES
Given the vast, rickety edifice of the fog of deception which is supposed to mask and obfuscate this corruption, do not be taken aback when we suggest to you that it seems highly probable that, accurate though the information contained in Wanta’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus largely was (or else he would have been imprisoned for perjury), nevertheless, it formed a layer of a deeper ongoing deception, which had also been supported by Wanta’s instructed and accepted use of the Editor’s publishing and website platform (see above). That arrangement suited the Bush-CIA-DVD Crime Syndicate and the chief behind-the-scenes manipulator, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, because the Editor had promulgated, to the best of his knowledge and belief, that the colossal accruals stashed in the huge portfolio of offshore accounts ‘belonged’ to Wanta under the Reagan Executive Order 12333 arrangements (January 1981), which recklessly allowed US intelligence operatives to set up corporations and to own the shares thereof.

• These corporations would then ostensibly ‘contract’ with the CIA and its 16+ subsidiaries, to conduct Financial Warfare and other ‘Black’ financial operations on behalf (ostensibly) of Uncle Sam but in reality of the power-usurping US “State within the State’ directed by the key North American Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst, Dachau, operative George H. W. Bush Sr.

(We now believe that the German Jew Henry Kissinger, who persuaded President Ford to sack William Colby as Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) and to replace him with George Bush Sr., whose family is also of German Jewish extraction, is the supreme DVD manipulator and snake inside or associated with the corrupted US structures.

Kissinger appeared at the satanic mass held in the Chapel of St Peter and St Paul described by the Editor’s late friend Fr. Malachi Martin and reviewed in the Editor’s large book The New Underworld Order, and was excommunicated from his US Jewish congregation in 1974 by a Rabbinical Court presided over by Rabbi Marvin Antelman. Of all the evil characters in this constellation of fiends, Kissinger is the most unpleasant. Following the 9/11 abomination, he appeared on a TV show and mocked the 9/11 dead in a high-pitched, squeaky voice (which identified him as being possessed, as it was not Kissinger himself who was speaking, but one of his ‘familiars’).

• On the very day of Princess Diana’s memorial service which this character attended, Kissinger was spotted that same evening in a night club, ogling at a belly-dancer).

AN ‘ANOMALY’ IN THE TEXT OF THE PETITION
Some further information needs to be extracted from the
Petition for a Writ of Mandamus before we go any further. Paragraph 4 stated:

‘Petitioner has attempted to access monies that were transferred through international bank monetary clearing systems to financial institutions located in the United States of America. The remitting party was the People’s Republic of China, People’s Bank. The remitting party designated that the transferred funds were for the sole and exclusive use and benefit of [the] Petitioner. The foreign entity that originated the inward remittance designated Petitioner as sole and exclusive recipient for the transferred money/financial instruments’.

Recalling that Greenspan and Snow travelled to China following the ‘unintended’ (because of the Editor’s ‘wild card’ intervention) termination effective 14th November 2005 of Wanta’s probation, paragraph 12 of the Petition stated as follows:

‘Premised on the representations of Secretary Snow and Chairman Greenspan, the legal services of Troutman Sanders, LLP [attorneys working for George Bush Sr. – Ed.] and Jenkins and Gilchrist Parker Chapin, LLP (Attorneys) were employed to complete the preparation and [to] administer the execution of agreements and documents referred to collectively as “Settlement Documents”. The following is a compilation of the significant parties that are represented as either obligors and/or beneficiaries of the Settlement Documents:

• Petitioner Wanta identified in this Petition
• Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (including but not limited to Land Baron/Xeno)
• National Security Agency (NSA)
• Department of Homeland Security
• Director of National Intelligence
• United States State Department
• United States Department of the Treasury
• United States Department of Defense
• The White House, including but not limited to the Offices of President and Vice President
• C.B.I.C. In. (Mr William Bonney Sr.)
• China (PRC), France, Great Britain, Germany and other foreign nations participating under one or more international “Protocol” including but not limited to the Reagan-Mitterrand Protocols.
• Others of interest not intentionally omitted as part of this Petition‘.

‘The entirety of the financial assets mentioned in the Settlements documents prepared by the above mentioned Attorneys concerns approximately $27 Trillion United States Dollars in value.

The portion attributable and payable to the Petitioner is $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars’.

Paragraph 20 of the Petition then stated:

‘Upon best information and belief, “Respondent” individuals, agencies, public, private, nominated and/or elected have knowingly, overtly, covertly and with specific intent conspired together to defraud Petitioner’ – which, as a professional deceiver himself, Wanta should have anticipated.

In an Affidavit attached to the Petition, Wanta stated in Paragraph 3:

‘During the most recent three to five years I have been attempting to coordinate the repatriating of substantive financial resources from foreign locations in the United States and cause the tax payments owed on the repatriated funds to be paid to the US Treasury. I have substantially completed the stated objective task with the assistance of one or more foreign sources’.

Given that the Editor of this service was furnished with Power of Attorney investigative powers to identify assets held in certain ‘Wanta’ offshore corporations as described above, which had been transferred into the PERSONAL name of Jan Morton Heger, one of his CIA lawyers, and given the brush-off we received from Coutts Bank, the Editor has considerable difficulty with this statement.

DECEPTION EXPERT DOUBLE-CROSSED BY DECEPTION EXPERTS
At the same time, it is clear that Wanta, a deception and double-cross expert, was indeed himself deceived and double-crossed over the $4.5 trillion ‘substitute’ compensation arrangement, which was represented to him (on the basis of our open information) as his payment to overcome the problem arising from the recklessly permissive state of affairs under Reagan’s Executive Order 12333, whereby operatives who deal exclusively in deceit and lies, were permitted to establish corporations. To allow professional liars and deceivers to operate corporations ostensibly under contract with US Government agencies was an act of supreme stupidity and folly which, of course greatly facilitated the wholesale, free-for-all ransacking and stealing of funds on a scale without historical precedent – operated under the ‘crooks’ charter known as the National Security Act of 1947 et seq. (which requires operatives to deny that they are intelligence operatives at all times).

Wanta was double-crossed because although he was ‘allowed’ to assume that he controlled (technically) the accounts of the myriad offshore corporations in question (which the Editor has separately listed in our reports [see Note (3)], in fact he was the de facto custodian of accounts used by Bush Sr. to hide some of the colossal accruals arising from the Bush-Clinton Criminal Syndicate’s pillaging of other people’s funds, including funds of participants in the Ponzi-model ‘Prosperity’ and ‘Humanitarian’ Programs. These funds were stolen from the participants, who broke the ‘Prudent Man Rule’, necessitating the installation of a deeply cynical, long-running, ongoing programme of diversionary agitation and propaganda designed to throw sand in the eyes of the estimated 320,000 pillaged victims, so that the stolen money remains stolen indefinitely (at least, that was what was intended). After all, under the classic Ponzi model, Peter is robbed to pay Paul: but under the more sophisticated Bush Crime Syndicate model, there is no intention to pay Paul whatsoever, i.e. the money is STOLEN: PERIOD.

The Clinton version of this is to ask the rhetorical question: who is Paul?

MONEY STOLEN FROM PETER IN ORDER NOT TO PAY PAUL
In order to prevent Peter from taking matters into his own hands, a barrage of convoluted and diversionary disinformation and interwoven fairytales has to be sustained for years on end – a chore that paid agents engaged for this sordid purpose must find tedious in the extreme, quite apart from being so soul-destroying, cruel and degrading.

Of course, the perpetrators of the thefts couldn’t care less that many families have been disrupted, marriages destroyed, people have died destitute and in despair, and suicides arising out of the scandalous state of affairs, have been reported.

They set about the stealing of the Ponzi scam victims’ money, they stole their money, and they then ordered an open-ended barrage of confusing, endlessly self-contradictory propaganda to keep the Ponzi victims hoping that their stolen money would be restored. Whether it will be restored or not, we don’t know. All we know about is the cruel, orchestrated, non-stop caterwauling which has been deliberately and cynically installed just to keep these poor people quiet.

CORRUPT U.S. GOVERNMENT RAPES, MURDERS AND PILLAGES ITS OWN PEOPLE
And the fact that the US Government’s pays cadres to disseminate such despicable lies and diversionary propaganda to the victims of the Government’s own predatory organised criminal corruption, is itself a scandal of unforgivable proportions. A Government that exists to serve the people has systematically raped, murdered and pillaged them instead – to satisfy the sordid greed and lust of a deviant bunch of mentally defective, dirty-minded criminal operatives feuding among themselves and serving in some cases foreign enemy masters.

For make no mistake: The long-range pan-German Abwehr plan to establish ‘the Thousand-Year Reich on the Ruins of the United States’, stated in Nazi documents seized by the Allies at the end of the Second World War would have been consummated had exposures of the financial corruption not brought about the disintegration of the inverted pyramid of lies, with the truly remarkable consequences that are about to unfold.

CURIOUS ’INTERCHANGEABILITY’ OF U.S. ‘INTELLIGENCE’ ACCOUNTS
The fact that the offshore corporate accounts and monies from which Wanta was removed when Bush Sr., in collaboration with the Clinton White House and the Governor of Wisconsin, Tommy Thompson, arranged for him to be arrested in Lausanne on 7th July 1992 on a charge of having failed to pay Wisconsin State tax (even though of course Wisconsin has no external jurisdiction), appear to be ‘interchangeable’ between US operatives, was made apparent to the Editor of this service when he made the discovery in April 2006 that the ‘Wanta’ corporate accounts held with Lloyds Bank TSB, Aylesbury, had been shifted into the PERSONAL name of ‘former’ Wanta CIA lawyer Jan Morton Heger.

How is this possible? The Editor cannot answer that question: but what he CAN do is to record that Wanta told him, when the Editor queried why the accounts had been moved unto the name of Jan Morton Heger, that ‘intelligence operatives can do things like that’.

• Nor did he seem in the slightest concerned that he no longer controlled these accounts, even though he had provided the Editor with a limited Power of Attorney to establish their status.

So, on the one hand, Wanta needed to know their status, while on the other hand, he wasn’t ‘phased’ that the accounts had slithered into the control of Jan Morton Heger. The Lloyds TSB Manager himself asked the Editor how much money the accounts contained. Of course the Editor had no idea, but he answered: ‘Billions’.

WANTA RELEASED FROM JAIL IMMEDIATELY AFTER 9/11
As noted, Wanta was incarcerated and undoubtedly suffered badly during his time in the Gulag. Then 9/11 occurred. What happened next? On or around 19th September 2001, which is to say just over ONE WEEK AFTER 9/11, Wanta was suddenly RELEASED FROM JAIL.

Specifically Mr Wanta was collected by AUSTRIAN-BORN Gerald Seichert, and was driven to his daughter’s home in Wisconsin, where he languished under probation until the Editor of this service paid for the Court’s ‘restitution’ (payment of the $14,129 in State tax for the third time (plus interest) which had already been paid TWICE, in May and June 1992), as a consequence of which Wanta’s probation was shortened by five years and two months (from the scheduled expiry date of 28th November 2010, to the 14th November 2005, when Mr Matthew J. Frank, Secretary, the Wisconsin Department of Corrections, signed his Absolute Discharge [see facsimile: International Currency Review, Volume 31, Numbers 3 & 4, page 202 (Fourth Quarter 2006)].

In passing here, we may record that there was an ominous DELAY of four months between the Editor’s payment of his private money by Steven Goodwin to the Wisconsin State Department of Corrections on 21st July 2005, and the Absolute Discharge on 14th November, during which period the Editor became extremely concerned. It appears that agonised discussions were taking place behind the scenes, as the CIA had disseminated the lie that Wanta was dead; and now, all of a sudden, he was able to move around and prove that he wasn’t.

• But why was Wanta suddenly released from jail just over a week following 9/11? Clearly the two events were linked – a matter that had puzzled the Editor for a long time.

UNTIL, that is, the Editor finally realised that the so-called ‘Wanta’ accounts were/are some of the so-called ‘Bush Sr.’ accounts, which is why George Bush Sr. says ‘the money is mine’.

JAILED TO PREVENT WANTA FROM LEAKING 9/11 PLOT IN ADVANCE
On 14th July 2009, the Editor obtained specific confirmation from an impeccably knowledgeable US source of the accuracy of his deduction that the so-called ‘Wanta’ accounts were indeed some of (if not most of) the accounts then used by Bush to stash stolen and other monies arising not just from the Financial Warfare operations against the Soviet Union (which was also partly true) but, more generally, from endless criminal finance operations conducted under cover of Bush’s de facto control of the CIA-Intelligence Power: hence Langley’s formal designation as ‘the George Bush Center for Intelligence’.

• As we have stated previously, the word ‘Terrorism’ should be substituted for ‘Intelligence’ here – not least since money-laundering, the ongoing stealing of funds, and illicit ‘Black’ finance scams generally are TERRORISM as defined by the perpetrators’ own pre-prepared Patriot Act legislation.

Now, what had happened was that Bush Sr. and Clinton and the CIA conspired to remove Wanta, a difficult character, from access to the accounts by concocting the farrago of lies and diversionary claptrap that we have recounted at length in our ‘Wantagate’ reports. The ‘falling out’ was in fact a standard ‘switch’ or double-cross perpetrated by the Godfather Bush against an operative who had originally been entrusted with certain tasks, including US Financial Warfare Operations against the Soviet Union, by President Reagan, who had called Wanta ‘my junkyard dog’. Wanta himself told the Editor that Reagan used to brief him personally, and that George Bush Sr. (then Vice President and therefore in charge of the National Security Council) was usually not present at these briefings.

OUR DEDUCTION ABOUT THE ACCOUNTS IS CONFIRMED
When the Editor enquired on 14th July 2009 whether his deduction that the Wanta offshore accounts were/are ‘Bush Sr.’ accounts, which was CONFIRMED, he also asked: ‘Why was Wanta released from jail almost immediately after 9/11?’ Wanta was suddenly collected from jail (see above) by Gerald Siechert, of Austrian extraction, and driven to his daughter’s home. WHY?

The authoritative answer to this question:

• Because Wanta knew about the planned 9/11 operation, and the Three Presidents (Bush Sr., Clinton, Bush) and their co-conspirators were concerned that Wanta, who had fallen out with Bush (and was deeply resentful of the way he had been treated) might reveal what he knew IN ADVANCE OF the atrocity. But after it had occurred, that was no longer a problem, so he was released’.

• Have you understood the significance of what has just been stated?

Recall that the former President of Italy, Francesco Cossiga, told Corriera della Sera, Italy’s most respected newspaper, on 5th December 2007, that ‘the disastrous 9/11 attack has been planned and realised by the CIA and Mossad’. There is no way that such a senior intelligence officer as a former Italian President would make such a statement, if it was not true: WHICH IT IS.

PROOF THAT 9/11 WAS MASS MURDER BY THREE PRESIDENTS
THREE Presidents of the United States, with the CIA and Mossad [see below] conspired to murder over 3,000 people in order to achieve their filthy, sordid objectives. Not only is this a case of mass murder, for which ALL OFFICIALS WHO HAVE STOOD IN THE WAY OF THE ARREST OF THESE THREE CRIMINAL MURDERERS stand likewise accused of aiding and abetting mass murder and likely breach of the Misprision of Felony Statute, but we are dealing with TREASON as well.

It is BEYOND A DISGRACE that law enforcement in the United States has not arrested these mass murderers. We all know that elements of law enforcement are themselves corrupt and/or ‘work for’ George Bush Sr. and his imploding, defeated criminal syndicate. But now that the economic and financial consequences of the operations of these criminal elements at the highest levels of the US Government – including inside the Obama White House – are destroying the lives of many millions of Americans and dragging the Rest of the World into a depression with prospectively devastating consequences for humanity, it is GROTESQUE that this criminal crisis is being allowed to continue because the American elements concerned haven’t got the basic guts to arrest these gangsters without further ado. Robert Gates, the current Pentagon Chief, was formerly the CIA’s Director of Central Intelligence: does he therefore lack all traces of integrity?

VREELAND DID PREDICT THE 9/11 ABOMINATIONS
Office of Naval Intelligence operative Lt. Delmart Mark Vreeland, whom the Editor interviewed at length in Niagara Falls, Canada, in May 2003 [see timeline, Note (1)] DID reveal IN ADVANCE the intended atrocity, in his Prison Note, written from a jail cell in Canada, in August 2001. He managed to have his information transferred to Canadian intelligence contacts, who are therefore implicated in the atrocity if they did nothing. They certainly did not resort to the ONLY weapon that works: pre-emptive publicity. No, they preferred people to die en masse, rather than to stick their necks out.

Vreeland’s ‘Prison Note’, written in August 2001, contained the exclamations: ‘They will paint me crazy and call me a liar. Let one happen, stop the rest!!!’ Having interviewed Vreeland over a period of several days in May 2003, the Editor is certain that, while this operative was/is an induced MK-ULTRA-type ‘multiple personality disorder’ victim (whose various ‘alters’, including an ‘assassin alter’ can be activated by pre-programmed phrases delivered by handlers) – and despite his serial low-life criminal behaviour and that he scammed the Editor’s VISA card to the tune of £1,600, he told the truth in discussions about global issues.

In the course of a live interview on 5th June 2002, Vreeland said that he conveyed his warning about 9/11 in advance of the event, to Canadian intelligence. ‘Yes I did, most definitely. I told it to their face, my lawyers told them to their face, and they knew what was going on. As far as I know, Colonel Kispel and his partner informed the United States and Ottawa immediately, through the RCMP and NSIS and CSIS [Canadian intelligence organisations]. (4)

In March 2005, the Editor was informed by a Pentagon-linked operative that Vreeland (who had threatened the Editor with death while he was riding from Niagara Falls back to New York City in May 2003, in a bizarre ‘switch’ attempt) ‘is in solitary confinement for a very long time, his case is sealed, and he is no longer a threat to you’. However the fact that Vreeland has been ‘taken down’ does NOT invalidate the accuracy of his geopolitical information, of the information he conveyed to this Editor about the endless damage and evil that George Bush Sr. has inflicted upon the United States and the world, and of his ACCURATE prior warning about 9/11.

• MORE DETAILS ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED TO VREELAND:
Correspondents have mined the prison data and have provided the Editor [17th July 2009] with the following information. After his arrest in Iowa in October 2004, Vreeland was convicted in 2006 of 13 felony charges, and was sentenced in October 2008 to 336 years in prison in Colorado. His current so-called ‘facility assignment’ is Buena Vista Correctional Complex. His estimated Parole Eligibility Date is 2nd June 2124. His Parole Hearing Date is 1st March 2124, when he will be 156 years old.

Vreeland was indeed a low-life criminal, but what is (deliberately) not understood is that the ONI recruits such personnel for some of its operations. This practice has the advantage that when the time comes to dispense with the operative’s services, the ONI operative in question can easily be discredited because of their serial criminal behaviour, as in Vreeland’s case. However as a multiple personality disorder MK-ULTRA-type victim, Vreeland was perfectly lucid (and was extremely well informed and intelligent) provided he was ‘on his meds’, and the right ‘alter’ was being consulted.

His knowledge of certain matters in the Soviet Union was accurate (which the Editor, who is also the Editor of Soviet Analyst, knew, because of his own special knowledge), and the details that he provided concerning the criminal international operations of George Bush Sr., conveyed to the Editor by Vreeland in May 2003, were subsequently found by the Editor to be true.

In the Editor’s opinion, his undoubtedly necessary conviction on 13 of multiple felony charges was actually allowed to go forward because he had opened one of three diplomatic bags which he had couriered from Moscow, which is treason. Colin Powell, Secretary of State du jour, had issued a Warrant for his extradition from Canada, which the Canadian authorities had failed to execute.

• Moreover Vreeland’s exclamation ‘Let one happen, stop the rest!!!’ encapsulates what was intended with respect to 9/11 – which Wanta knew about ahead of the event, as well.

OUR WARNING ABORTED A NUCLEAR EXPLOSION
The Editor is informed by reliable sources that our exposure of what we knew about a plan under the Bush II Administration to explode a nuclear device on US soil, resulted in the operation being aborted. The Editor had sent a message to a source linked to US military personnel containing the following sentence: ‘Does the military realise that these criminals are playing nuclear blackmail on US soil as their leverage to avoid paying the (Wanta) Settlement? If they don’t (which I doubt) they need to now!. Please inform the Colonel of my views urgently’: see our report dated 25th October 2007: Archive. In the subsequent two segments, we wrote:

PLANNING A NUKE EXPLOSION TO AVOID PAYING WANTA?
Whether these fears were well founded or not, the ruthlessness of the cornered criminals that we have been having to deal with these past 18 months is undoubtedly such that they would be willing to go to any lengths to get their own way. After all, they were prepared to sacrifice the lives of more than 3,000 people on 9/11, inter alia to procure the destruction of the original copies of a mountain of derivatives contracts held by Cantor Fitzgerald that were falling due imminently for settlement in US dollars. The firm lost 658 of its staff in that abomination.

During the chaos, a huge volume of gold was stolen from the underground vaults of Bank of Nova Scotia. After getting away with those atrocities, the idea that a man like Cheney, a ‘former’ satanic MK-Ultra and Omega controller and operative with links into organised crime, would cringe at a rogue operation to indulge in nuclear blackmail on US soil in order to create conditions under which the stolen $4.5 trillion could be retained and not transferred to the corporate securities account with Morgan Stanley, New York, would be fanciful.

• The military Colonel’s response to the Editor’s message on this score, received by our veteran intermediary on 19th October was: ‘He is probably correct’.

TWIN CITIES PREDICTION JUDGED TO BE ACCURATE, TOO
It has been acknowledged by several special sources that the Editor was ‘probably correct’ too, about the intended Twin Cities atrocity which we exposed last April [2007]. Under that scenario, a nuclear device was to be exploded in the Twin Cities of Minneapolis-St Paul on 1st September 2008 – the (very late) opening date for the pre-election Republican National Convention.

Using Kabbalistic Illuminati numerology [which these madmen go by], that date devolves to 9/11 [September: 9; 1 (first of the month); 2008 = 2+8 = 10; +1 = 11]. Since it is well known that these maddened Luciferians have a hang-up about TWINS, the long-range strategic takeover plan called for a catastrophic atrocity at the beginning of the Bush II reign on 9/11 with the destruction of the Twin Towers, followed at the end of the Bush II reign with a catastrophic abomination in the Twin Cities in the course of which the Republican Party would be destroyed – providing the pretext for the perpetuation of Bush II under a dictatorship.

CHENEY AND STRUCTURES WORKING OVERTIME TO STOP ‘IT ALL COMING OUT’
In line with the tendency of officials lies to decay within a rough time-span of seven years, former Vice President Cheney, the embodiment of CIA evil, has been engaged for weeks in pre-emptive public appearances in anticipation of an emerging high-voltage campaign, which appears to be orchestrated, to discredit him and make him the scapegoat for the 9/11 and other atrocities – so that the Three Criminal American Presidents, the CIA and Mossad somehow manage to avoid the consequences of their crimes.

Apart from the Three Criminal Presidents, of these perpetrators, by far the most reckless seems to be Mossad and its faction inside the highest-level US structures, starting with the White House. These people appear to believe that a repetition of mass pogroms against the Jews which erupted in Germany, innocent as well as those who are complicit in all the corruption and abominations, is becoming more and more likely, as more of the suffering population wakes up to the extraordinarily elevated level of people of Jewish extraction who are implicated in these scandals.

NEW COORDINATED 9/11 LEAKS BY ‘LICENSED’ U.S. AGENTS
Recent revelations by ‘licensed’ US agents implicating Richard Cheney in preparations for the 9/11 abominations can hardly be considered coincidental. An allegation that Cheney, Scooter Libby and the CIA operative Stephen A. Cambone discussed with Osama Bin laden (CIA operative Tim Osman) the use of Al-Qaeda-CIA operatives to be employed as patsies and fall guys in the 9/11 context, and repeated information about the pre-9/11 involvement of Cheney, Libby and Rumsfeld , together with a new wave of 9/11 detail, are now being widely disseminated.

In his analysis dated 10th July, Wayne Madsen reported on the National Security Agency’s own internal ‘security’ force, known as the ‘Q’ Group, which he said ‘has grown to an immense security and counter-intelligence force, with an estimated 1,000 Government employees, contractors and paid informants. NSA’s Security force is reportedly primarily tasked with plugging any leaks of classified or other information that point to the US Government’s involvement with the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001’. Madsen elaborated:

‘NSA Security is also able to utilize the Agency’s most sophisticated electronic surveillance systems to monitor the activities of journalists’ – as the Editor of this service knows only too well, as every telephone conversation on both sides of the Atlantic attracts hoards of these impertinent electronic eavesdroppers, working for Fort Meade, GCHQ, Munich (DVD), Paris, you name it. This enables the Editor to play these nasty people along at their own game, of course.

‘The cell phones’, wrote Madsen, ‘of journalists are routinely used as listening devices, even when turned off. And what was considered a sure-fire method of avoiding having a cell phone used as a transmitter – removing the batteries in what became known as ‘batteries out’ conversations – is no longer safe’. Interestingly, the Pentagon-related operative referenced above asked the Editor to remove the batteries from his cell phone, which he also did – indicating that US operatives seem to be more concerned about their own competing agencies eavesdropping on their conversations, than about talking with ‘foreign’ parties.

‘Even when the batteries are removed, the Global Positioning System (GPS) chip in cell phones continues to have enough residual power that two or three pings from satellites can give away a person’s location, plus what other uniquely identifiable cell phones are at the same location’.

‘The bottom line is that a number of NSA personnel who were on duty in the months leading up to 9/11, the day of the attacks, and subsequent weeks and months, are aware of undeniable facts that point to a massive cover-up by the Bush-Cheney Administration of the circumstances surrounding 9/11 ’ – and the resulting stench of the rotting corpses of 3,000 human beings – ‘including what actually befell UA flight 93 and WHO was issuing direct military orders from the White House’.

‘The Obama Administration… has turned up the heat and is resorting to even more draconian methods to ensure silence. The word from inside NSA is that a state of fear exists and the mission of the Agency – to conduct surveillance of foreign communications to provide threat indications and warnings to US troops and policymakers and protect sensitive US Government communications from unauthorized eavesdropping – is suffering as a result’.

On 15th July, Madsen further reported that ‘The Obama Administration has shown every indication of protecting Cheney and other top Bush Administration officials from scrutiny. Obama recently extended Cheney’s Secret Service protection by six months, an indication that the White House is concerned that international arrest warrants for homicide may soon be issued against the former Vice President’, one of the most evil creatures ever to have occupied the US Vice Presidency.

• For ‘Obama Administration and ‘White House’ here, read Rahm Emanuel. Israel Defence Force and Mossad ‘Kidon’ (Bayonet) personnel are reported to have penetrated the Pentagon under Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and Feith, according to Madsen.

BITTER FEUDING OVER THE MONEY BY RIVAL INTEL FACTIONS
Complicating the chaos within the gigantic US Intelligence Power is a bitter ongoing internal power struggle that, broadly speaking, reflects a deadly conflict between the Bush-Kissinger-Greenspan dominated DVD-oriented Crime Syndicate element, and the components opposed to the ‘Germans’ inside the corrupted and feuding US structures.

However, far from placing the interests of the nation at the top of their agenda, the ‘non-Bushites’ have been fighting the Bush-directed cabal over the money. The two broad divisions spend their time fighting for control of the stolen funds: that’s what they DO. And the Bush Syndicate people are assisted in this endeavour by the Mossad Israelis, including the very sinister ‘Political Action Committee’ represented inside the White House especially by Rahm Emanuel.

The endless warfare between these two broad groups within the fractious US Intelligence Power concerns control of the money and nothing else, requiring some modification of our hitherto perhaps too monolithic view of the Intelligence Power.

According to that analysis, the arrogant ‘State within the State’, represented by the CIA and its 16+ ‘subsidiaries’ and the National Security Council controlled by the Vice President, has usurped control of the Federal Government . The basic means by which this has been achieved has been the familiar one of ensuring that candidates for and occupants of the highest positions within the structures are controlled intelligence operatives who answer to their handlers. The Intelligence Power has achieved this illicit status thanks primarily to its ‘penetration powers’. The other two sides of the power triangle – the Military Power and the Party Power (divided dialectically into two controlled segments) – are thus penetrated and largely controlled by the Intelligence Power.

WHOEVER WINS ELECTIONS, THE CIA/NSC ALWAYS WINS
Therefore, it is essentially neither here nor there which political party wins elections, since the Intelligence Power always wins. There is no difference between this system and the overt or covert Soviet model, where elections also take place: but it is likewise neither here nor there who wins in the overt or covert USSR, as the controlling Communist Establishment (which operates currently underground and through Putin’s Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) apparat) always wins.

Bitter rivalry, tension and warfare within the US Intelligence Power over control of the stolen and diverted money means ironically, however, that the huge Intelligence Power has weakened itself, since ‘a house divided against itself cannot stand’. However this is a brutally strong and arrogant house, accustomed to getting its own way, and ruthless in the execution of its plans (although not quite as ruthless as the Mossad ‘Kidon’ cadres with which elements of the US Intelligence Power collaborate). Even more ironically (for the uninitiated, at any rate) is the odd reality that the sole remaining ruthless supporters of the Bush Financial Criminal Syndicate within the criminalist Intelligence Power nexus, are the Mossad Israelis.

THE RULE OF LAW SOLUTION WILL PREVAIL: ‘SET IN STONE’
With these considerations in mind, let’s review some recent developments. It is understood that on or about 11th July, after hastily convened meetings in various locations in the Washington area, a delegation flew in a rush to London. Our understanding is that certain clarifications were sought from highest levels in the British capital following the conveyance of certain papers by fax that we can’t go into [see earlier references to papers submitted to Thames Valley Police, Special Branch].

The US delegation received the answer they didn’t want, namely that the payee list had been redefined to conform with original requirements last weekend and to incorporate a certain designated line payment, which instruction can be summarised as follows:

• The Rule of Law will be applied in accordance with specified required arrangements,
and this is ‘set in stone’.

This setback shocked the US participants, coming so soon after supposed President Obama had been given a flea in his ear in Moscow, where, according to reports, officials refused to shake his hand. We presume that this gesture was intended to indicate that they couldn’t shake his hand as Moscow ‘doesn’t know’ whether President Obama is legitimately in office or not.

DEVELOPING U.S. MILITARY CRISIS OVER OBAMA’S STATUS
As is now well known, Major Stefan Frederick Cook, a US Army Engineer, who was called up to serve in Afghanistan but had protested that he could not conscientiously comply since he could only accept orders from a Commander-in-Chief who holds his position legitimately, suddenly had his call-up revoked by the Department of the Army, US Army Human Resources Command, St Louis, MO, implying a belated recognition by the US Military that there is doubt even in the Pentagon over the President’s legitimacy.

Clearly, this state of affairs represents a grave crisis because should the situation not be regularised, and if the logic of the matter were to be followed through, all US military deployments and operations would have to cease, with the personnel being recalled from theatre – which could be what underlies this extraordinary state of affairs. If we pursue this logic further, we can see how the United States’ enemies would benefit from this dimension of the crisis, which ‘just happens’ to coincide with the deliberate, instrumental, perverse and clearly calculated sabotage at the highest levels of the Settlements payouts – blockage of which is directly associated with the non-payment of the Obama Stimulus monies (barely 10% of which has apparently been remitted) and therefore non-payment of promised funding to the desperate US States.

BANKS REFUSE TO HONOUR CALIFORNIA I.O.U.s
As a consequence, California is issuing IOUs which, when we last checked, banks were refusing to honour. It is understood that paychecks due to State employees in certain States were not paid on time (Pennsylvania being a case in point), and that ad hoc arrangements such as California State employees being ordered not to come in to work on the final three Fridays of each month, are spreading across the nation.

In California, according to Martin D. Weiss PhD, counties are awash with mortgage meltdown data: on 22nd June, Weiss reported that 5.32% of Los Angeles County mortgages were 90 days past due, with the following figures for many other counties: Monterrey County, 8.02%; Imperial, 8.13%; San Bernardino, 8.66%; Madeira, 9.21%; San Joaquin, 9.53%; Riverside, 10.2%; Merced, 10.57%.

With foreclosures skyrocketing, the State’s unemployment rate had surged to 11.5% by June, with 739,500 jobs having been lost since June 2008. California’s projected $24.3 billion State budget assumes no further deterioration of the economy, whereas the reality is that if the crude sabotage directed from the White House continues, the downward spiral will guarantee a deficit twice that size, with an unemployment rate approaching 20% and California’s credit rating, already the lowest of all US States, reduced to junk status.

• There are in any case indications that the true rate of unemployment in the United States, measured on discarded criteria, may already be approaching 20%.

THE GHANA EPISODE, PLUS: OBAMA ‘WANTS HIS CUT’
Unconfirmed reports were received in this office that, having been rebuffed in Moscow, Obama and/or his entourage attempted, even at this very late stage, to ‘do deals’ in Ghana, where, as in Moscow, ‘everything fell apart’. That would have reflected the presence in the Ghanaian capital of British intelligence advisers who serve the only upholder of the Rule of Law in this context: Her Majesty The Queen. MI5 operates in all Commonwealth countries.

There have also been references from ‘underworld’ sources gathered by this service that one reason for the continued White House sabotage operations is that ‘Obama wants his cut’.

According to sources the previous three corrupt Presidents became billionaires or more, and Obama sees no reason why these precedents should not be followed in his case, too.

WARRING INTEL GROUPS FURIOUS BUT IMPOTENT
When the team returned to Washington from London having been informed that the Rule of Law is to be applied and that the existing required Settlement arrangements will not be varied, the two warring components of the criminalised US Intelligence Power, neither of which has the interests of the American people or the Rest of the World in focus, were believed now to be at each others’ throats, furious and sullen like spoiled children who cannot get their own way, but impotent – and not just because the Rule of Law presupposes the developing total and absolute termination of exotic, illicit, untaxed off-balance sheet financing consistently with Basel-II and Basel-III, and with the legitimate requirements of the wronged British supreme power.

Specifically, the two warring intelligence community factions had to contemplate, at weekend meetings in the White House and elsewhere, the reality that NEITHER side within the Intelligence Power has ‘won’, but rather that the Dollar Refunding process requested by The Queen when she asked the G-7 powers to proceed with it ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’ in 2006, will prevail. Dealings will take place with the party who is neutral and can be trusted and who does not belong to, or have anything to do with, the warring factions, as everyone ‘in the know’ is well aware.

Sources allied with the Bush Syndicate in touch with this service have ceased contact since we published the preceding report stressing the tax, tax evasion and money laundering angle. Others with whom we have been in contact through our intermediaries have been told that they have to comply – all of which has come as a shock to certain parties, which had every intention of carving up the cake in accordance with their own preferences rather than with what was agreed and is required for consistency with the Rule of Law. Tax will be deducted at source: the Internal revenue Service will be paid and funds will be remitted net of tax [see the preceding report concerning tax liabilities and the tax evasion and money laundering dimension].

Accordingly, to back up the released money, the United States was reported on 14th October to be buying up gold, a process believed to have been completed by close of business on that day.

OUR THINKING ON DERIVATIVES GOES ‘MAINSTREAM’
Interestingly, Bloomberg reported on 15th July that Mark Mobius, Executive Chairman of Templeton Asset Management in Singapore, was reported to have said in a telephone interview from Istanbul on 13th July that a new financial crisis will develop in a few years’ time as a consequence of failure to regulate derivatives and the additional overall global liquidity that is ostensibly to be disbursed associated with stimulus spending. ‘Political pressures from the investment banks and from all the people that make money in derivatives’ will prevent adequate regulation, Mobius said, echoing the long published assessment of this service. ‘Banks make so much money with these things that they don’t want transparency because the spreads are so generous when there’s no transparency’. He added that a ‘very bad’ crisis may emerge within five to seven years as stimulus money adds to financial volatility, after Governments have pledged about $2.0 billion in stimulus spending.

But as we have seen, in the United States, hardly any of that money has been forthcoming – due exclusively to the sabotage of the Settlements and infighting within the CIA over control of the money, referenced above. While this selfish and criminal behaviour has persisted, the world’s biggest banks have written down and lost at least $1.5 trillion because the bottom fell out of the derivatives sector when the real cash-cash sovereign funds were placed into ‘lockdown’ between 10th and 12th September 2008, as advised by this service. Against that background, the oil price, falsified due to criminal speculation in syndicate-participating oil corporations’ dealing rooms, fell steeply from around $147 per barrel, to about $30 in the final quarter of 2008. Global share markets lost 50% of their value in 2008, shedding $28.7 trillion.

WARNING BY WORLD BANK’S CHIEF ECONOMIST
The Chief Economist with the World Bank, Justin Lin, said on 15th July that $30 trillion had (prior to that very day’s stock market surge) been wiped off global stock markets, and $4.0 trillion off US house prices. Mr Lin was particularly concerned that the global real economy could easily fall into a ‘deflationary spiral’ if excess industrial capacity is not cut back. ‘Excess capacity has built up, and unless this issue is addressed, we will face a deflationary spiral’.

Thus, while the corrupt financial sector has been partially rescued, the real economy is in absolute agony and threatens to drag the whole world into a black hole – thanks to the perverse, criminal, intransigent, terrorist, treasonous sabotaging operations conducted from the Intelligence Power-controlled White House under four US Presidents.

It is already the case that productive capacity usage has fallen to 72% in Germany, 69% in the United States, 65% in Japan and below 50% in some large developing countries. In the United Kingdom, unemployment in the three months to the end of May jumped to 7.6%, a 12-year high – confirming anecdotal evidence known to the Editor of this service of firms systematically trawling through their payroll to assess who they can sack next.

In a global downwave, countries cannot count on competitive currency depreciation as a way out to boost exports, since export markets are unable to respond. ‘No country can count on currency depreciation and exports as a way out. Unless we deal with excess capacity, it will wreak havoc on all countries’, Mr Lin added. The Japanese real economy, where headline inflation has again turned negative at – 1.1%, and deflation has now returned to stay, will shrink by 7% in real terms this year, following a catastrophic 14.2% annualised output contraction in the first quarter, when the trade account moved into deficit as well.

GEITHNER’S ‘STANDARDISED CONTRACT’ RED HERRING
Incredibly, the US Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner, who only knows about derivatives, has recently urged Congress to ‘rein in’ the derivatives sector, which has virtually collapsed (see above) with legislation that would be ‘difficult to evade’. The US Treasury Secretary essentially repeated Mr Obama’s ‘call’ to compel exchanges or ‘regulated platforms’ to apply ‘standardised’ derivatives contracts, and to regulate all dealers. This latest Geithner intervention is almost beyond belief, as it presupposes (a) that contracts for fraudulent ‘assets’ with no known value (beyond ‘what someone is prepared to pay for them’) and no recourse to real underlying income streams, can be made ‘uniform’; and (b) that his earlier free-wheeling insistence that the derivatives sector must be reignited was perhaps, er, a little over-hasty.

REARGUARD OPERATION TO ‘RESCUE’ FRAUDULENT FINANCE
For his part, Tim Ryan, head of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, told The Financial Times [7th July 2009] that ‘the securitisation market has seized up’. He then uttered the following ‘Geithnerism’: ‘We are convinced that getting securitisation started again is the single most important question facing the capital markets today’.

A Citi Group report, cited in the same newspaper analysis, has stated that ‘about $8,700 billion of assets are currently funded by securitisation [globally] … and [if] this securitised leverage matures with no replacement, global economies will be forced to contract’ – which, being interpreted, would mean that replacement, given that the securitisation market has ‘dried up’, will not materialise.

That is indeed, the case, because this illicit, exotic off-balance sheet financing is finished. That was then: this is now. The Rule of Law will be applied and the dislocations that are talking place will be alleviated when funds arising from transparent taxable transactions are deposited ON-balance sheet, ONTO the books, consistently with the Rule of Law norm that will prevail.

DISLOCATIONS ARE DUE EXCLUSIVELY TO CORRUPTION AND FRAUD
Conversely, the dislocations that have taken place and which continue today, are exclusively the consequence of the sabotage operations directed against the Rule-of-Law Settlements from the White House under four Presidents, with the enthusiastic assistance of serial criminal financial enterprises like Citibank – all of which, with their associates, have been engaged in perpetrating Financial Terrorism against the American people and the Rest of the World, given the feuding US intelligence community background described in outline above.

Put another way, it is too late for the likes of the criminal financial enterprise Citigroup to try to blackmail the world in the manner implied by its cited warning that further securitisation may not be forthcoming to cover maturities on $8,700 billion of assets around the world.

• Citi was itself extensively responsible for this state of affairs, and it is now too late to attempt to reverse the damage for which it is partly responsible.

On the contrary, the Rule of Law will prevail and the criminal financial enterprises, including the disaffected, warring, self-centred components of the US Intelligence Power, will comply with it.

AUTOMATON WHITE HOUSE KEEPS ON ‘KICKING AGAINST THE PRICKS’
Given this ‘real world’ outcome, further crass sabotage operations (‘kicking against the pricks’) sponsored by the White House – notwithstanding the ever more conspicuously desperate plight of the US States and economy – have been countered with universal disgust and contempt, since we last reported. On 14th July, the Government tried to ‘tap into the money’, a criminal operation that was ‘stopped by the Swiss’ enforcement operatives [see earlier reports], when comparing the US payment ‘screen’ with the screen in Basle.

It is reported to us that the US military, under Robert Gates – the former CIA Director of Central Intelligence, no less – is supposed now to be in charge of enforcing the releases. Yet given the recalcitrant attempt by the Government itself to interfere with the releases on 15th July, Gates’ effectiveness in this context, given his compromised position, appears to be typically ambivalent. Neveretheless he, too, has to comply.

On 15th July, we were advised that Chinese parties intervened and collapsed the release process, complaining that they were unhappy with the so-called ‘revised’ terms arising from the redefined payee list (see the line item payment referenced above) – a development requiring explanation.

PAYEE LIST REDEFINED TO INCLUDE A KEY ‘LINE ITEM PAYMENT’
Because what this means is that the ‘terms’ that had prevailed prior to the US delegation to London being given the appropriate dressing down and the redefined payee list, diverged from the terms required by the wronged British sovereign power – and furthermore that the Chinese parties in question were going along with this apparent intention to divert components of the release funds. So when the Chinese found out that the US delegation had been told in no uncertain terms that the ‘Rule of Law’ arrangements for the releases inherent in the just redefined payee list including the mentioned line item payment will prevail and that these proper arrangements are ‘set in stone’, they objected. The Chinese straddle both sides of the corrupted, criminal, feuding factions within the tawdry US Intelligence Power, you see.

LAST-MINUTE SCAMMING OPERATIONS BY THE CROOKS
What also emerged on 15th July was as follows:

• Two attempts to ‘release’ on 15th July were aborted when the ‘screens didn’t match’ due to the fact that the payee list had been redefined as required by the British sovereign power (and Basle) to include the specific line item payment. On at least the second occasion, it emerged that certain people were scheduled to be paid who should not be being paid, i.e. that the detailed payment arrangements in the United States had not yet been re-adjusted BACK to what the key sovereign power, the wronged power, requires. This, as explained above, is the pattern of payment that will prevail, incorporating the mentioned line item payment, and the Swiss enforcers reporting to Basle are ensuring that compliance with these requirements is absolute.

• George Bush Sr. is STILL skimming money ‘off the top’.

• Certain of Obama’s people knew that Bush Sr. was stealing and skimming money off the top of illicit trades exploiting the payout release funds, but withheld this information from the supposed President (i.e., are complicit). Count Rahm Emanuel in here.

• Criminal former Vice President Cheney is reported to us to have had his hand in the till as well, as usual. Ironically, since off-balance sheet monies will not be allowed, all this money that these criminal fools are still trying to steal, is going to be worth zero.

• Insistence on application of the ‘Rule of Law’ solution has revealed that these criminal parties had, as indicated above, long since ‘divided the cake’ up among themselves, despite still fighting over the slices, contrary to what was pre-agreed, required – and necessitated, in accordance with the World Court Writ of Execution probably handed to Obama in London on 1st April, as reported.

• Rearguard sabotage operations are being/have been run out of the Obama White House by the so-called ‘Political Action Committee’ (PAC) operation headed by Rahm Emanuel, who stole funds from the murdered Vincent Foster, who was believed to have been handling up to $500 billion. Emanuel, a treasonous Mossad (Irgun) operative, who ‘knows all about’ 9/11, is closely linked to the Clinton Crime Family component of the Syndicate, and was/is the go-between between Mossad, the Clintons and Bush Sr. Rahm Emanuel took the funds to Chicago where he became a partner with Wasserstein Perella and Company, the entity with which the former President of the World Bank, James Wolfensohn, was associated. Some time ago, two participants in the PAC were arrested for violations of national security (stealing state secrets).

EXCERPTS FROM A CRUCIAL AFFIDAVIT
In an Affidavit prepared and signed on 29th December 2008 by Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., notarised by Raemarie T. Kovaly, Notary Public, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and conveyed to the Editor of this service for onward forwarding, Mr Cottrell reported as follows [verbatim]:

… On September 12, 2008 between approximately 8:37 a.m. EST and 8:52 a.m. EST, Mr Dana V. Wilcox telephoned me and discussed the following items:

(a) That the above-mentioned items [referencing matters of global importance referenced earlier in the same Affidavit] combined with the current subprime/derivative débacle now requires a new “Private Funding Refunding Operation of the US Dollar” – without US Government funding;

(b) That the new refunding flow charts would resemble the flow charts [that] Delmarva Timber Trust, et al., had developed under Mr Wilcox and Mr Cottrell;

(c) That said flow chart system identified joint venture projects between Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. and Delmarva Timber Trust, et al., to create tax incentives and full tax payment to the US Government, et al., as part of the refunding process, and fund numerous low-income housing, waste management, other infrastructure projects, and administration auditing teams for the projects;

(d) That these flow charts and processes were the actual basis of the “Wanta Plan” activities, as presented to Mr Christopher Story, FRSA, by Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., March 15 and 16, 2006;

(e) That Mr Wilcox agreed that upon receipt of the G-7 Refunding Funds to Pennsylvanian Investments, Inc. Securities Account at Morgan Stanley NYC, per the “Wanta/G-7 Plan”, he would act as ”Consultant at Least” for Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. and Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.;

(f) That the people identified with the [then] proposed Obama Economic Team – i.e., Dr Ben Bernanke, Mr Robert Rubin, Mr Timothy Geithner, Mr Lawrence Summers, Mr Paul Volcker, and specifically Mr Rahm Emanuel (Wasserstein Perella & Co.) – may have been tainted, by the actions of previous Presidential Administrations since 1981, and, therefore, may require ”safeguards” that ensure the demise or that hinder the effectiveness of the “Private Funding Refunding Operation of the US Dollar”.

(g) That Mr Wilcox and Mr Cottrell believe the release of the aforementioned funds would demand a transparent Presidency and a country operating under the Rule of Law. Only a proper privately funded refunding with third party auditing – not the President’s Cabinet as the auditing party – will allow the US Dollar to regain its capitalization value and renew the world’s international trading markets with full disclosure and transparent regulation’. (5).

Source: Notarised Affidavit and statement of facts plus 43 pages of supporting documentation dated 29th December 2008 submitted by Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., 1157 West Street, Erie, PA 16502 to Christopher Story FRSA, Edward Harle Limited, dated 29th December 2008, for onward transmittal to sovereign authority.

Notes:

(1) Extracts from a timeline analysis of the background to the Criminal Finance Crisis associated with the Editor’s personal involvement: Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 3 & 4, pages 3-25: July 2009:

• 10 September 2001: The Editor’s fourth daughter, having travelled round the world and wound up in New York City, decides not to visit the Twin Towers in downtown New York with a friend early the following morning. Instead they take the Staten Island Ferry, from which she takes pictures of Manhattan, including the last known photographs of the Twin Towers before the abomination.

• 11 September 2001: The deliberate blowing up, with inside US Government connivance and foreign participation, of the Twin Towers on the precise 30th anniversary of the commencement of building work, and on the birthday of Feliks Djerzhinski, head of Lenin’s Cheka, shocks the world.

In the course of this ‘Reichstag Fire’ abomination, 658 staff at the offices of the broker Cantor Fitzgerald perish, along with a huge portfolio of trading contracts, while a large volume of gold is stolen from underground storage facilities owned by Bank of Nova Scotia. The Editor is physically unable to work creatively for three weeks after the shock of this abomination.

• 11-18 September 2001: Frantic efforts are made to evacuate our youngest daughter from New York City. Eventually, she travels by train to Boston, and manages to catch a liner to Southampton. Meanwhile our New York apartment is covered in a layer of grey filth. Eventually the carpet has to be discarded, and the place completely repainted as the walls and ceiling are filthy as well.

• Late October 2001: The Editor attends our New York office in Midtown Manhattan and notices an unpleasant smell. This smell pervades everything and it becomes fully clear that it is the smell of decaying flesh – the same stench that troops have reported over the centuries from battlefields. The stench is accompanied by the film of grey material, which blankets the office, requiring hours of deep cleaning. The stench remains throughout the Editor’s visit. People in the Midtown New York street seem accustomed to it, but the Editor can recall the smell to this day.

• February 2002: The Editor attends at the New York office and finds that the stench of rotting flesh has not gone away, although now it seems to depend on the direction of the wind. But it is still very noticeable and all-pervading.

• June 2002: The Editor is invited to a peculiar conference event in Washington DC convened by www.unansweredquestions.org. Briefed beforehand on this outfit, the Editor discovers that it is a controlled operation seeking to influence and manage the responses and behaviour of the 9/11 bereaved families of the murdered occupants of the Twin Towers. At this meeting, an operative dressed in bright red circulates with 30 portfolios containing inter alia photocopies of Federal Reserve print-outs showing colossal sums of money being remitted to various parties, including the then President of the United States, George Bush Sr., in 1992.

The annotator/auditor has written on the relevant sheet that receipt of emoluments by holders of office under the United States is illegal, and pointing out that George Bush Sr. has been receiving corrupt payments while serving as the President of the United States. The agent distributed these folders to 30 recipients, but not to the Editor, who asked for a set of the documents later, when a group of us met for drinks in the bar of the International Press Club, where the event was held. It later transpires that the folders were actually handed to intelligence community operatives, with the single exception of a set that was handed to a representative of Vanity Fair (which never used the material). The Agency therefore assumed that the information had been successfully clawed back and could therefore ‘do no harm’ (to the CIA).

• July 2002: The Editor contacts the agent and asks for a set of the documents (called the ‘FINS’) to be sent to him in London. These duly arrive about a week later. The Editor tsubsequently reviews the printouts, which turn out to be from a Federal Reserve Board master computer and show that the payments were remitted under the authority of Dr Alan Greenspan. Uncertain at first whether the documents were genuine or not, the Editor then pursues various lines of enquiry and continues with his normal workload.

• December 2002: The Editor concludes that the documents are genuine and resolves to expose them via our financial journal International Currency Review. The resulting issue, called our ‘first take’, is then prepared.

• March 2003: We publish International Currency Review, Volume 28, Number 4, which contains early analyses of these documents and accompanying materials, together with information about the ‘Black’ background of George H. W. Bush Sr. and assessments of the significance of the Federal Reserve print-outs, which carry indications on the top of the sheets to the effect that they were faxed originally by Lt. Delmart Mark Vreeland, whom we establish to be an ONI (Office of Naval Intelligence) operative.

• 19 March 2003: George W. Bush Jr. launches the illegal assault on Iraq and is caught on the White House video system punching his fists in the air and exclaiming ‘Feels good, feels good’. From now until early May, no one pays attention to anything at all beyond the war in Iraq.

At the outset, US Special Forces attack the Central Bank of Iraq and steal its gold, currency, paper assets and probably currency printing plates. The Special Forces engaged in this operation are then systematically liquidated, as uniquely reported by our services.

• Note: Our report on the attack on the Central Bank of Iraq, including the deliberate subsequent mass murder of the Special Forces operatives who carried out the attack, is being republished in International Currency Review, Volume 34, Numbers 3 & 4: pages F-37 to F-61 [July 2009].

It originally appeared in Volume 29, #1, on pages 33-58 [Summer 2003]. This analysis is apparently considered to be the classic report on the subject.

The assault on the Central Bank of Iraq was one of the key objectives, and enabled the White House to control a supposedly ‘independent’ financial institution, which could then be used as a key counterparty for exotic secret, and illicit, ‘Black’ financing purposes. When Mrs Hillary Clinton, a CIA operative, appeared in Baghdad in May 2009 to access the stolen Katrina funds which had been stashed in the Central Bank of Iraq, she was met by a Gold Badge who metaphorically placed his hand on her shoulder and told her she had been caught in flagrante trying to move the stolen Katrina funds. He also informed her that the funds had long since been retrieved. This episode reminds us how stupid these US financial operatives are: all such movements of funds are monitored and traced 24/7 using derivatives of the ‘see-through’ PROMIS software.

• Early May 2003: The Editor receives an unexpected phone call from ONI operative Lt. Delmart Mark Vreeland who, it later turns out, is ‘on the run’ and based in Yukon. Vreeland has somehow obtained a copy of International Currency Review, Volume 28, #4 (probably sent to him in Yukon by Gwendolyn Waymark: see below) and states that it is important that ‘we should meet’.

The Editor rashly agrees.

• Mid-May 2003: It is agreed that we will meet at McDonalds in the below-ground station area at Long Island Railroad station adjacent to Penn Station, New York. Vreeland asks the Editor to keep in touch throughout his journey and starts by asking him to make contact from Heathrow Airport. When contact is made, he asks the Editor to wire funds to him via Western Union from the airport, thus establishing a pattern of scamming behaviour that continues throughout the encounter, so that on the Editor’s return to London, he found that his Visa card had been scammed of £1,600.

On arrival in New York, the Editor is subjected to the usual operative technique of changing the venue, and is asked to take the next train to Niagara Falls, Canada, which he does. On arrival there, the Editor checks into a hotel and establishes that Vreeland is en route via Greyhound Bus from Yukon through Vancouver to Toronto and is approaching Toronto.

At a given moment Vreeland phones to say that the Editor should meet him in a shooting alley on Clifton Hill, the ghastly spectacle laid on for mindless visitors from the United States. Since the Editor knows what Vreeland looks like, he soon finds him in this location. Other details of this encounter can wait for the comprehensive exposé that is planned.

• It transpires that one of the sources of the FINS is indeed Vreeland himself, who, though an MK-ULTRA victim (split personality) and subject to necessary medication in order for the permanently warring ‘alters’ of his contrived multiple personality syndrome to remain under control, is lucid and extremely well informed and intelligent when examining the issue of our journal in some detail and explaining more about the geopolitical context. Thus Vreeland correctly reveals to the Editor that most of the world’s most serious problems can be attributed to George H. W. Bush Sr. who runs the German operation within the CIA and has the whole of the US Government in his grasp.

Vreeland, who predicted the 9/11 attacks from a Canadian jail cell in August 2001, also reveals that he had been sent to Moscow in December 2000 where he had managed to insert a Sony Playstation printed circuit inside a military installation, removing the circuit integrated inside the equipment.

He also related how his ‘partner’, the Canadian operative Marc Bastien, had been murdered after consuming a spiked drink in a Moscow bar, and that he (Vreeland) had couriered three diplomatic bags from Moscow to Toronto. (Obviously Vreeland may have been a suspect in this murder).

His story was that as he expected he would be ‘set up’, he had three dummy diplomatic bags, and when he was met at Toronto Airport by Russians, he handed them the empty bags and kept the US diplomatic bags, one of which he later opened (which is treason).

It remains unclear to us whether the Federal Reserve printouts were obtained from the opened diplomatic bag or from another source. Vreeland explains the role of Leo/Lee Wanta, an operative who, with his Chinese ‘partner’, Howie Kwong Kok, was said to have been extensively involved in Financial Warfare operations against the Soviet Union in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

Vreeland then threatened the Editor with death while the Editor was travelling back to New York from Niagara Falls, having ordered him to get off the train and to return to Canada, which the Editor refused to do (‘bait and switch’).

• Note: Following meetings and contact with a Pentagon-linked operative arranged by Gordon Thomas, this operative informed the Editor in March 2005 that ‘Vreeland is incarcerated for a very long time in solitary confinement, his case is closed, and he is no danger to you now’.

• May 2003: On returning to New York from Niagara Falls, the Editor finds a voicemail on his New York answerphone, from a Bush-linked operative, Gwendolyn Waymark. The message contains the warning: ‘None of this must ever come out, you understand’.

When an investigative journalist is addressed like that, the inevitable response is that a cover-up operation is in play and that, accordingly, further investigations are mandatory. By now the Editor suspected that the ‘national security’ cover was being used to mask immense corruption, stealing and exploitation of funds by corrupt elements within the US Government structures, and that he would accordingly do the opposite of what Waymark requested.

• July 2003: The Editor establishes the address of Wanta and travels by car to visit him, but there is no one at home due to the summer vacation period.

• May 2004: The Editor visits Leo Wanta out of the blue and is welcomed into the home, which belongs to a member of his family. Wanta is out of jail, to which he was consigned ostensibly for non-payment of $14,129 of Wisconsin State tax which he had in fact paid twice (in May and June 1992) as extensively described in our reports. The detail of the Wanta case will not be repeated here: it is all in the public domain, published in International Currency Review and on our website; and none of it has been challenged by any authority, although the Editor, who is now in possession of improved information, is now in a better position to amend any earlier misunderstandings which were due to inadequate data.

Very shortly after 9/11 (on 21st September 2001), Wanta is let out of jail and placed on probation, restricted to the State of Wisconsin. The fact that he was let out of jail within days of 9/11 is a relevant fact of crucial significance. Wanta had accumulated a vast number of offshore Executive Order 12333 US intelligence accounts holding colossal sums in cash, collateral and other assets, plus lock boxes containing diamonds and other items, ostensibly arising from the ransacking of the Soviet Union. However that was a convenient partial ‘cover story’.

• November 2004: The Editor is urged by Gordon Thomas, a veteran British journalist ‘with contacts within MI6’, to get in touch with the Pentagon-linked operative. The Editor refuses.

After further urging and statements by Thomas to the effect that ‘he has been vetted by MI6’, the Editor relents and an appointment is made for the Editor to contact the agent in the fishing tackle section of a sports store on Fifth Avenue, New York City. As in a tradecraft movie, the Editor finds this man, complete with spook’s raincoat, ostensibly examining fishing rods at the back end of the store. This agent takes the Editor to the Algonquin Hotel and plies him with Coca Cola, while very evidently recording everything that the Editor says. He asks questions concerning Vreeland, and the Editor informs him that Vreeland is a multiple personality disorder MK-ULTRA Illuminati victim trained to respond to trigger phrases (i.e. there would be a sequence which would trigger his role as an assassin). The agent later uses the Editor to extract from him detailed information about the two Soviet ships that left the Iraqi port of Umm Qasr in February 2003, carrying most physical traces of weapons of mass destruction manufacture and assembly.

• The agent sent repeated email requests for more information on this subject, which the Editor compiled from his own open sources and from the Soviet military Intelligence (GRU) website!

• December 2004: During a visit by the Editor to Gordon Thomas in Bath, Thomas reveals that MI6 has disseminated lies about the Editor to the gullible British press (a matter extensively reviewed by us elsewhere). Specifically, it has been suggested to the British media that the Editor had been involved in the aborted Equatorial Guinea venture with Mark Thatcher, a fanciful piece of make-believe – whereas of course the Editor has done nothing else at all since 1970 but work 24/7 on our publications. Gordon Thomas indicates that ‘with a new Bush Administration in power, Washington has asked MI6 what they intend to do about Mr Story’ (i.e., would they please take steps to bring this confounded investigative journalist under control, as he is causing us a great deal of trouble: by which was meant that he is thought likely to expose our serial criminality. How right they were).

• March 2005: After a meeting in Washington, DC, with the Pentagon-linked agent, who, having asked for copies of our publications which he said he would pay for but never did, and who had seemed most annoyed when the Editor showed him the further issues of the journal containing detailed elaborations of this financial research, the Pentagon agent telephoned the Editor in London and asked him questions about ‘our arrangements with Bernie Ecclestone in Monaco’ about which the Editor knew nothing whatsoever.

After listening to this for several minutes, the Editor said: ‘I have no idea what you are talking about. You had better go back to your source’. The agent was silent for some time and then said: ‘That is worrying in view of where this comes from’ (i.e. MI6). When the Editor had ‘joined up the dots’, he telephoned Gordon Thomas and in an extended conversation, which has since been published, he asked him why MI6 thought they could disseminate craven lies and get away with it. To this, Thomas uttered his notorious response: ‘It doesn’t matter that it’s not true. All that matters is that it’s out there’. He then explained… ‘They probably think you’re dangerous because you’ve got the documents and you control your own publications and no-one can tell you what to do’.

• Dangerous TO WHOM? Again, as with the Waymark intervention, this represented a clear signal that the investigations must continue, come what may.

• March 2005: At Wanta’s suggestion, the Editor visits Richmond, VA, to meet the Düsseldorf-born Steven Goodwin, one of Wanta’s (CIA) Attorneys. (Wanta, by the way, always answers the phone in German: ‘Guten Tag’). The Editor buys Goodwin a dinner, during which Goodwin explains that he has negotiated an agreement with the Wisconsin State Department of Corrections for Wanta’s probation to be shortened on payment of a certain sum of money by way of ‘Restitution’.

The amount in question is over $30,000 [see detailed background: www.worldreports.org: Archive: 6th August 2007]. In retrospect it was clear that Mr Goodwin was suggesting subliminally that the Editor should come up with the funds in question. The amount would consist of a third (completely irregular as the Editor later discovered) payment of the original $14,129 plus interest, plus fees.

• April 2005: The Editor decides, after a great deal of thought, to proceed with payment of the $35,000 and identifies private funds obtained from a successful sale of our private central London property. Goodwin is asked to prepare the necessary loan documents.

• May 2005: The Editor visits Wanta again and spends longer in his Wisconsin location, updating his understanding of Wanta’s rôle as custodian of the innumerable offshore bank accounts linked to his Financial Warfare operations against the USSR in conjunction with Howie Kwong Kok.

However these accounts are now believed to represent depositories of Fraudulent Finance operations conducted on behalf of the Bush Crime Syndicate. The loan documents that Goodwin should have sent never materialised, until the Editor’s final day in New York, when they suddenly appear (after ostensibly having been sent no less than three times previously).

• 10 June 2005: The Editor visits Wanta in Wisconsin and Wanta sticks the loan documents on the table essentially with the command: ‘Sign here’. Taken aback, the Editor wonders whether to leave immediately without signing, but decides instead to sign, having ‘come this far’. The Editor then buys Wanta lunch and dinner.

• June-July 2005: The Editor deliberately delays to see whether this would cause Wanta problems, and sure enough he is badgered on the phone by Wanta on several occasions. Finally the Editor sends a bank draft for $35,000 to Goodwin with instructions on what he is to do with the funds, which have been provided on a loan basis at 7.0% for two years, repayable in full with interest on 11th June 2007. Goodwin then drags his feet and initially resists the Editor’s sharp request that he travel to Wisconsin to obtain the necessary receipt from the Department of Corrections.

Finally, after being ordered up to Wisconsin by the Editor, he goes there, and obtains a receipt (demanded by the Editor) dated 21st July 2005 plus a computer print-out the following day stating that no further funds are owed.

• July-November 2005: Notwithstanding that the payments have been made, Wanta’s probation is not shortened as was agreed by Goodwin with the Department of Corrections, until 14th November 2005 (following a delay of four months), when a formal document signed by a Mr Matthew J. Frank, Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections, emerges confirming that Wanta has been given an unconditional discharge (purchased with the Editor’s loan funds).

This shortened his probation by five years and two weeks. Goodwin should then arguably have obtained a dispensation from the Court deleting Wanta’s status as a felon which he did not do.

[The Editor wrote to Wisconsin Judge James Martin on 17th October 2007 (see website Archive report dated 27th October 2007) under ‘Misprision of Felony’ drawing his attention to the extreme proven irregularities perpetrated by the Wisconsin Department of Corrections summarised in the website report dated 6th August 2007: see Archive]

• December 2005: Dr Alan Greenspan and the US Treasury Secretary, John Snow, travel to China where they ostensibly enter into negotiations with Chinese parties including probably Howie Kwong Kok concerning the release of ‘Wanta funds’.

• 15-16 March 2006: The Editor visits Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., in Erie, Pennsylvania, arriving in the middle of the night amid a snowstorm. No taxis were available at the old Amtrak station, and the Editor walked several miles in the pitch dark without the slightest idea of where he was.

Eventually a cab crammed full of people stopped at some traffic lights. The Editor hailed the full taxi, and the driver said he would return in 40 minutes. At the subsequent meetings, Michael Cottrell outlined the Private Sector Refunding Programme for the US Dollar which the Editor described in outline in the forgoing Affidavit dated 29th December 2009.

• 18 March 2006: Visiting Goodwin at Richmond for a second time, the Editor is party to a special conference call to Coutts Bank, London, involving Goodwin, the Editor, Wanta, and Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., who was then Treasurer and Executive Vice President of Wanta’s AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., registered in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Asking for Mrs Burgess, whom the Editor had met at Coutts earlier, Goodwin was put through to a Mr Robertson who said that Coutts did not have a relationship with Mr Wanta, which contradicted information in our possession.

The purpose of the telephone call had been to arrange for the Editor, equipped with a very limited (information only) Power of Attorney, to visit Coutts Bank with Goodwin in early April 2006 to inspect assets held by specific ‘Wanta’ corporations at Coutts and to report accordingly. Robertson denied that the bank had any banking relationship with Wanta and the call, which was listened to by many agencies, was terminated, after the Editor had stated that he was engaged in research into stolen funds for publication in our journal International Currency Review.

• Late April 2006: Equipped with the limited Power of Attorney, furnished by Goodwin on Wanta’s instructions, the Editor visited Lloyds Bank, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, to meet the Manager in order to be informed about specific accounts ‘owned’ by Wanta, so as to report back.

The manager went away and returned with the information that the accounts had been shifted into the PERSONAL name of Jan Morton Heger, one of Wanta’s ‘former’ CIA Attorneys.

• Late April 2006: Wanta, now free to travel outside Wisconsin thanks to the Edsitor’s loan money, suddenly travelled to California where he was briefed by CIA operatives. When he returned, the previous intention of collecting all the assets for repatriation to the United States appeared to have been abandoned and Wanta spoke instead of $4.5 trillion that was to be brought over from China, which was ostensibly to represent his compensation for ‘wrongful imprisonment’ and for what he had done in executing Financial Warfare instructions issued by Reagan directly to him.

• May 2006: The $4.5 trillion was duly delivered in good faith by People’s Bank of China, into the custody of Bank of America, Richmond, VA. It was ostensibly supposed to be paid over to Wanta and/or his corporation in June 2006, which came and went with no such payment.

• June 2006: John Snow is suddenly replaced by the former CEO of Goldman Sachs, Henry M. Paulson Jr., who has the $4.5 trillion transferred to a Goldman Sachs account with Citibank and, according to our best information and belief, later places the $4.5 trillion into contract for trading purposes for one year, behind Wanta’s back. As Treasury Secretary, he nevertheless retains sole signatory control over the $4.5 trillion, which on the face of it represents a grotesque abuse of power and conflict of interest – a point that we subsequently emphasise in our web reports. Paulson should have been impeached for this transgression.

• July 2006: The official US disinformation machine gets into full gear, with its first lie focused on ‘expectations’ that the $4.5 trillion would be paid on 31st July, which does not happen.

At this stage, the Editor’s website platform starts to be used by Leo Wanta to run a campaign to ‘embarrass’ the US authorities into paying over Wanta’s $4.5 trillion. Details of this de facto campaign are omitted here, as they are decisively on the record on our website Archive and in successive issues of International Currency Review.

• 02 September 2006: The Editor publishes a macroeconomic assessment outlining the benefits which will follow payment and the use of the ‘Wanta’ funds for Refunding purposes, which is what has been agreed by the G-7 Group of financial powers [see Note (5) below]. Moreover HM the Queen was reported to have told the G-7 participants in June 2006 that the $ Refunding had to proceed ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’ – revealing that Buckingham Palace has access to the very best macroeconomic advice in the world.

The Editor’s report also predicts the consequences of not implementing ‘The G-7-Approved Refunding Plan’. The predictions contained in that report pre-dated macroeconomic reports by self-appointed ‘gurus’ who now say that they were the first to predict what has happened accurately.

• September 2006 to March 2007: The de facto website report ‘campaign’ achieves worldwide fame and is magnified when French intelligence disseminate the reports to innumerable outlets, giving us a per-report readership estimated at one stage as high as nearly 50 million.

• December 2006: We report that Henry M. Paulson, US Treasury Secretary, is arrested in Germany. This report, which we knew to be accurate, was laughed to scorn by observers for a few days until knowledgeable sources whispered in the background that it was accurate. Mr Paulson was later exfiltrated from German custody aboard a British plane and dumped at the Washington Cathedral for the prolonged memorial service for President Ford, in early January 2007.

• 29-30 March 2007: Without any warning, the British banking system closes down. The Editor becomes aware of this when attempting to refill a mobile telephone pay-as-you-go arrangement using a VISA card. Over the next few weeks it transpires that gold assets belonging to the British monarchy have been hijacked or stolen or diverted while the British banking system was closed down to the outside world and to the general public. The heist was perpetrated by insiders within the Bank of England and elsewhere, working with corrupt US counterparts. In due course, the Editor publishes this information on the website.

• April 2007: The Editor publishes a warning that information obtained from Vreeland in October 2004 when he warned a contact of the Editor for the Editor’s information that an atrocity was intended in the Twin Cities of Minneapolis-St Paul, Minnesota, could refer to the Republican National Convention planned to start in the Twin Cities on 1st September 2008.

The Editor is later informed that an atrocity focused on the Twin Cities may have been aborted as a consequence (Note: The ‘Dark Forces’ have a hang-up about twins: Twin Towers, Twin Cities. 1st September 2008 also devolves kabbalistically to 9/11, which would have been a relevant factor as these people are hooked by such esoteric Babylonian-originated numerology). The Editor is also separately informed much later that our website forced another Bush II Administration ‘inside job’ atrocity – a planned nuclear explosion on American soil – to be aborted.

• 15 May 2007: The Editor informs a previously cooperative US contact of what he knows about the stealing of The Queen’s gold. The contact, lacking information, says: ‘I find that hard to believe’. The Editor says: ‘If you don’t believe what I say then don’t bother to contact me again’, and severs the contact. This came as a shock to the handling ‘structures’, which then took ‘special measures’ to have the agent removed from the scene. This was an unfortunate and unintended consequence of the ongoing US deceptions.

• 19-20 June 2007: The Bank of England sends $6.2 trillion of sovereign LOAN funds to Bank of New York Mellon for use to fund the Dollar Refunding Program after it has become apparent that the $4.5 trillion sent over by the People’s Bank of China in May 2006 ostensibly to finance Leo Wanta’s Settlement and the ‘Wanta Plan’ Refinancing operation, has been hijacked and diverted/stolen for illicit trading purposes to finance the US Intelligence Power’s ‘Black’ finance budget, to keep the criminal banking enterprises afloat, and for official and intermediary self-enrichment purposes. Instead of acting as a pass-through institution, BoNY Mellon hijacks the funds, which are then exploited ruthlessly until mid-September 2008.

Source: Excerpted from Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 3 & 4: July 2009. The actual complete timeline is much more extensive than is cited here.

(2) Banks identified by the Editor of this service from open domain documents we retain, as holding ‘Wanta’ (‘Bush Syndicate’) illicit funds (which, when ‘accepted’ by US authority, are ‘laundered via the sovereign’ and thereby legitimised):

AB Invest [Avenue Banque]
ABN-AMRO Bank N.V., Amsterdam,
Agape Holdings, Ltd, Barbados
Agricultural Bank of China
Algemene Spaar-en Lufrentenkas
Algemene Spaar-en Lufrentenkas/ASLK Bank
Altalanos Eriekforgalmi Bank Rt (AEB RT)
Amsouth Bank, N.A
Amur Commercial Bank, Moscow
Anglo Manx Bank Limited
Arab Jordan Investment Bank
Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Limited, Melbourne
Bacob Savings Bank, Borgerhout, Belgium
Banca di Roma, Rome
Banca Nazionale del Lavoro
Banco Ambrosiano Veneto
Banco Espanol de Credito, S.A., Madrid
Banco Espirito Santo e Comerciale de Lisboa, Lisbon
Banco Exterior de Espana, Madrid
Banco Hispano Americano
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas
Bank ‘UKRAINA’, Kiev, Ukraine
Bank Bruxelles Lambert
Bank Crozier Limited, Grenada [closed down, money stolen*]
Bank Dumesnil, Geneva
Bank for Foreign Economic Affairs of the USSR, Moscow
Bank of America
Bank of America International, New York
Bank of America, Milan
Bank of America, Newport Beach, CA
Bank of America, Vienna, Austria
Bank of China
Bank of New York, New York
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd, Tokyo
Bank Union de Crédit
Bankers Trust GmbH, Frankfurt
Banque Nationale de Paris
Banque Paribas (Luxembourg) S.A
Banque SCS ALLIANCE Geneva
Banque Suisse de Crédit et de Dépôts, Zürich
Barclays Bank, Hanover Square, London
CBI-TDB Union Bancaire Privée, Geneva
Chase Manhattan Bank N.A., London,
Chase Manhattan Bank, Milan
Chase Manhattan Bank, New York
Chase Manhattan Bank, Vienna
Chemical Bank of New York
Citibank – Frankfurt
Citibank – Geneva
Citibank – Los Angeles
Citibank – Milan
Citibank – New York
Citibank – Singapore
Citibank – Tokyo
Citibank – Vienna, Austria
Citibank, N.A., Philippines
Citicorp/Citibank
Citicorp/Citibank, London, Painewebber, Inc
Clydesdale Bank Plc
Commercial Bank ‘Moldova-Agroindbank’, S.A., Kishinev
Coutts Bank (Switzerland) Ltd
Coutts Bank, London
Crédit Lynonnais Bank Nederland NV, Amsterdam
Crédit Suisse Bank
Crédit Suisse Bank, Geneva
Crédit Suisse Bank, Lausanne
Crédit Suisse First Boston, Zürich
Credobank (Commercial Bank)
DBS Bank/Development Bank of Singapore: This bank was closed down by the authorities
and $70 billion was stolen in the process. The existing institution is a ‘phoenix’.
Dean Witter Reynolds
Den Norske Bank AS, Oslo
Deutsche Bank, Düsseldorf
Dresdner Bank, Frankfurt
Faroe Investments
FIDENAS AG, Zürich, Switzerland
Générale de Banque
Gosbank, USSR
Handels Bank AG, Zürich
Handelsbank Natwest, Zürich
Hansabank, Talinn, Estonia
Joint Stock Bank ‘Kazkommertsbank’, Almaty
Jugobanka D.D
Lloyds Bank Plc
Lloyds Bank Plc, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire
[Funds placed in the personal name of his former Attorney Jan Morton Heger]
Manufacturers Hanover Corporation/Mantrust
Marshall and Ilsley Bank
Merita Bank, Helsinki
Merrill Lynch Inc
Midland Bank Plc, London
Morgan Guaranty & Trust Bank, New York
Morgan Stanley and Co, New York
Morgan Stanley Asia Ltd, Hong Kong
Moscow Cooperative Bank ‘Partner’ Bank
Moscow Narodny Bank Ltd, Singapore
Mosstrolbank, AmeriTrust Corporation Inc.
National Bank for Foreign Economic Activity of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent,
National Westminster Bank
National Westminster Bank of New Jersey
National Westminster Bank Plc., Herne Bay, Kent
Nomura Singapore Limited
Nordbanken AB, Stockholm
Northern Trust International Banking Corporation
Norwest Bank, N.A
Ost-West Handelsbank, Frankfurt
Painewebber, Inc
Paribas (Suisse) S.A., Geneva
Philadelphia International Bank
Prudential Securities, New York
Raffeisen Zentralbank Osterreich, Vienna
Raffeisenbank Appenzell
Rafffeisen Zentralbank Osterreich AG [RBZ], Singapore
Relvnesheconombank, Minsk
Rigas Komerc Banka, Riga, Latvia
Royal Bank of Scotland Plc
Royal Trust Bank
Sanwa Bank Limited
Sanwa Bank Lt, Düsseldorf
Schweizerische Bankgesellshaft /Union Bank of Switzerland
Security Pacific Asia Bank, Ltd
Shearson Lehman Hutton Inc., Denver
Société Générale, Paris
Société Générale, Riga, Latvia
Southwest Securities, Inc
Standard Chartered Bank, Philippines
State Bank for Foreign Economic Affairs for Turkmenistan
Status-Credit Bank, Moscow
Swiss Banking Corporation
Swiss Volksbank, Zürich
Texas Commerce Bank, Dallas
Toronto Dominion Bank
Unibank A.S., Copenhagen
Union Bank of Switzerland, Geneva
Union Bank of Switzerland, Zürich
Vilniaus Bank AS, AB, Vilnius, Lithuania
Volksbank, Bonn, Germany
Volksbank, Offerdingen, Germany
Westdeutsche Landesbank, Düsseldorf, Germany
Zentralsparkasse und Kommerzialbank, Vienna.

* ONI operative Vreeland informed the Editor that he was among four agents who flew down to Grenada to investigate Bank Crozier after a huge theft from the bank was reported in the late 1990s. The theft was perpetrated by CIA operative Hillary Clinton, now the US Secretary of State. Vreeland reported that when the agents entered the bank, they established that the bank’s video system, which kept a visual record of everyone entering the premises, was blank during the period when Mrs Clinton attended at the institution. She reportedly stole a colossal sum of money.

We have separately reported that when Mrs Clinton visited Baghdad in May 2009, ostensibly to hold a ‘town meeting’, but in fact to access the Katrina funds stolen inter alia by the Clintons and hidden at the Central Bank of Iraq (which has been under direct ‘White House control’ since the invasion), she was greeted by a US Gold Badge who metaphorically placed a heavy hand on her shoulder and said: ‘You’ve been caught in flagrante, Mrs Clinton. And furthermore, the stolen Katrina funds have been retrieved’. It is believed that on this occasion, the bank’s video system was functioning perfectly normally.

• Unsurprisingly, Mrs Clinton was reported on 15th July to be suffering from a ‘broken elbow’. Normally gangster enforcement operatives briefed to maim but not to kill, would go for the knee-caps. But we imagine that a broken elbow would be agony too.

Source: International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 1 & 2, pages 168-171 and pages 331-332 [Third Quarter 2007]: website Archive reports: 30 December 2006 and 11 June 2007. Very self-evidently, some of these institutions have long since been absorbed into other institutions, have been rebranded, or have otherwise become successor organisations. Comprehensive details and facsimiles of the ACTUAL TRANSACTIONS, BANK ACCOUNTS AND COORDINATES, were published in International Currency Review, Volume 31, 3/4 [December 2006].

(3) Although there are many thousands of CIA proprietary US Government intelligence corporations, those with which Wanta was connected include:

Amberhaven Limited, Switzerland.
AmeriChina Global Management Group Ltd., US.
AmeriChina-Philippines Corporation, Philippines.
AmeriTrust (Suisse) S.A., Switzerland.
AmeriTrust Corporation, Canada.
AmeriTrust Corporation, Inc., United States.
Aneko Credit Pte Limited, Singapore.
Asian-Europa Development Limited, Singapore.
Cataract, Inc., United States.
Dagin Investment Corporation*.
Forum Construction S.A.*.
Galloping Ghost Ltd.*
Glister Mount Limited, Hong Kong.
Leo E. Wanta and Associates, Inc., United States.
Marvelous Investments Limited, British Virgin Islands.
Marvelous Investments Limited, United States.
MiApollo Investments Limited, Hong Kong.
MiApollo Productions Inc, United States.
Mitre Corporation, Inc.*, United States [MIT].
New Republic Air (Bahamas) Limited, Bahamas.
New Republic/USA Financial Group, Ltd., G.mbH, Vienna.
Patriarch Corporation, Malaysia.
Quarterhouse, Ltd., United States.
Ramo Manufacturing Co., Inc., United States.
Regency Catering, Inc., United States.
RUSS, Russian Federation
Tockton Enterprises, Inc.*.
Trans-Asia Global Resources, Singapore.
Vendor Leasing Services, Inc., United States.
White Cloud Petroleum Corporation, Delaware, US.

* Country of incorporation uncertain.

These CIA/DIA corporations conduct(ed) business, earned substantial profits, received assets, maintained bank accounts, duly filed ‘economic reports’ with the General Accounting Office (GAO), borrowed money, paid back loans, and operated ‘day-to-day businesses’.

Our usage of the past tense here merely reflects the documents in our possession from which these observations were derived, and does not preclude the fact that most of these corporations (and thousands of others) remain operative, even though trillions of dollars lodged therein have been diverted.

In the spring of 1992 an audit of CIA corporations’ assets and activities was carried out by the Hong Kong office of Price Waterhouse. The upshot was that the auditor certified that the total value of currencies, gold, precious gems and other assets THEN held by these and certain other (unnamed) Title 18, Section 6 USG companies amounted to $864,000,000,000. Source: International Currency review, Volume 31, Numbers 3 & 4, pages 190-191 [Fourth Quarter 2006].

(4) See: Soviet Analyst, Volume 29, Number 7, May 2005, page 8.

((5) Excerpts from our prediction of what would happen if the Refunding Programme (previously labelled by us ‘The Wanta Plan’) were not to be implemented expeditiously: published first on 2nd September 2006 and again on 3rd-4th December 2006 [see this website’s Archive for those dates]. Source: International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 1 & 2, pages 299-302 [Third Quarter 2007]. For this presentation, the phrase ‘The Wanta Plan’ (which, like ‘Wantagate’, we invented) is replaced by ‘The G-7-Approved Refunding Plan’.

THE GRIM CONSEQUENCES OF ABORTING THE WANTA PLAN:

Not implementing The G-7-Approved Refunding Plan will have the consequences indicated below, among many others. The primary assumption underlying what follows is that a wholly irrational and by now shambolic, terminal free-for-all has developed in which the myriad competing parties seek their own advantage, without regard for the broader consequences – or if they have any regard for them, place them on one side while they cynically pursue their own interests first.

• To begin with, the entire mass of the international financial community knows about this crisis – and that the American authorities have lied, double-crossed and deceived from the outset, that the Full Faith and Credit of the United States and the Rule of Law in America have collapsed, and that Bush II Administration officials are behaving like a bunch of arrogant Chicago gangsters who believe that because the intimidated ‘mainstream‘ media have failed to pick this story up, they are protected from the consequences of their serial criminality and duplicity.

• The consequences of blocking The G-7-Approved Refunding Plan itemised below are NOT dependent, as the White House may have presumed, upon the continued suppression of this crisis by the controlled US and UK ‘mainstream‘ media. On the contrary, the ‘mainstream‘ media, which is being constantly updated on the crisis, is liable to be caught off-balance by the devastating global consequences of the Bush II White House continuing to block this beneficial Settlements. Put another way, ‘they won‘t know what has hit them‘, and they will have to scramble to catch up.

• Institutions in the United States and abroad teetering on the brink of insolvency due to the severe financial knock-on effects of the US authorities‘ duplicity in failing to implement their undertakings and obligations concerning The G-7-Approved Refunding Plan, will go to the wall.

• The Communist Chinese increase the volume of oil traded in currencies other than the US dollar, following reports from New Delhi and elsewhere (in late August 2006) that such transactions had already started. With the failure of scheduled payments by the American authorities, implying clearly that the US dollar payments system has ceased to function and cannot be relied upon, the
Chinese Communists decide that they have nothing to lose by switching from the US dollar for oil payments to other currencies.

• The US dollar collapses by 50% or more. Since other key currencies are now in greater demand, because they are needed for oil payments purposes, their massive appreciations reflecting the US dollar‘s steep devaluation are, if anything, exacerbated further, given this sudden new demand.

• Since many US imports, including of course oil, continue to be in demand domestically, US price inflation escalates sharply, followed by interest rates. Indeed interest rates chase inflation upwards.

• The US housing sector, already in implosion mode, shifts into free-fall, housing starts collapse, and large swathes of the US economy follow downwards into unknown territory.

• Unemployment rises steeply, placing added burdens on the welfare sector which have further cumulative adverse financial consequences.

• The steep devaluation of the US dollar boosts US exports over time, in due course bringing about sharp reductions and then the disappearance of the country‘s $1 trillion annual trade deficit. This process, however, is subject to the so-called J-curve effect, whereby the foreign trade deficit worsens sharply to begin with, given that essential imports in the pipeline cannot be cancelled and still have to be paid for with steeply devalued dollars. It is only when these overhang transactions have been unwound, which can take years, depending on the volume of forward import contracts placed, that the beneficial effects of the dollar‘s massive devaluation start
to rebalance the country‘s external accounts.

• The deficit on the current account takes longer to eliminate because the outstanding US debt continues to exist and has to be paid off with steeply devalued dollars when surpluses appear on the balance-of-payments, which again may take several years. The immediate impact of the steep devaluation is therefore greatly to exacerbate the US domestic recession or depression brought about by the other adverse knock-on effects mentioned.

• Within a short space of time, Western economies, in particular, find that their exports cannot compete, and their steep currency appreciations, while curbing inflation and probably delivering price deflation, leave exporting companies unable to compete, forced to lay off staff or to close down altogether because their overall operations have become loss-making or uneconomic.

There will be much blood on corporate boardroom carpets, and much wailing and gnashing of teeth.

• The US and all other stock markets experience a slump with no historical precedent, which triggers bankruptcies throughout the business and personal sectors, throwing very large numbers of families into distress and inducing a sharp jump in the suicide statistics both in the United States and abroad. Foreclosures escalate, as do factory and corporate closures and failures.

• The stock market slump and knock-on consequences in related financial markets spread like a malicious contagion worldwide, with unpredictable outcomes universally conducive to an initial global slump.

• Chaotic currency realignments proliferate. If one underlying globalist intention had been to exploit this developing crisis to ‘call for‘ a world currency, this project, like all such globalist forward planning and conspiracies, turns out to be a monumental failure

Instead, what has been achieved is that:

• The world currency, financial and trading systems rapidly disintegrate, leading to the worldwide imposition of foreign trade tariffs and to a parallel ferocious, no-holds-barred, ruthless scramble for global energy resources that is far more intense than the current scramble, with extreme dangers for humanity.

• The criminal kleptocracy congratulates itself on having brought about the revolutionary collapse that their mad ideology requires, on the demented model of breaking everything up and rebuilding from the rubble. But like the hideous wars that these mad people instigate, ‘the law of unintended consequences‘ kicks in, and they wind up destroying their massive wealth and themselves, along with everyone else: THE SAMPSON OPTION.

Not very clever.

Note: July 2009: Of course, not all these predictions made on 2nd September 2006 and repeated on 3-4 December 2007 have yet come to pass. But many of them have!

• The resolution, compliant with the Rule of Law, has been ‘set in stone’, which will have the effect that the total collapse is averted in the nick of time, provided that the sabotage operations cease (uncertain at this posting) – and thanks exclusively to the impressive strength of character of the most important and powerful sovereign human being alive in the world today.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

WAR OF ATTRITION AGAINST THE U.S. CRIME CADRES

DOLLAR REFUNDING OPERATION TO PROCEED FROM LONDON

Monday 8 June 2009 02:00

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

• POSSIBLE RATIONALE FOR AIR FRANCE 447 DISASTER

• BLOWS RAIN DOWN UPON THE CRIMINAL ELEMENTS

• BUSH SR. AND BARBARA TOLD TO PACK FOR JAIL

• GEORGE W. BUSH REPORTED TO BE ‘ON SUICIDE[D?] WATCH’

• SENIOR U.S. ARMY AND AIR FORCE PERSONNEL ARRESTED

• KISSINGER ACCOMPANIED BY TWO INTERPOL AGENTS

• EARLIER INTELLIGENCE RECEIVED [DIARY FORMAT]

• DISCONNECT AT THE U.S. TREASURY

• IN BEIJING, GEITHNER TOUTED A ‘PAULSON’-STYLE $4T CONTRACT

• CHINESE SAID: ‘THE MONEY’S COMPROMISED: GET OUT’

• ‘MAINSTREAM’ NOW USING THE WORD ‘CRIMINAL’

• PERVERSE INTENT TO REVIVE AND CONTINUE THE FRAUDULENT FINANCE CAROUSEL

• MACROFINANCIAL ASSESSMENT AND PROSPECTS

• FOREIGN CREDITORS ARE CUTTING THEIR LOSSES

• POLICY DECISIONS WITHOUT THE MISSING INPUT

• INDICATORS OF GLOBAL DEFLATION

• CHENEY’S NEWSMAX OPERATION CLOSED DOWN?

• The Subs/Books Update Panel on the Home Page was updated at 8:00pm UK time on 22nd May 2009 to provide comprehensive details of all issues of our intelligence services published during the first five months of 2009, including the latest issue of our Global Analyst (Volume 3, #2). Soviet Analyst, Volume 31, #1 is ‘on machine’ at our print works and will be delivered soon. It will contain proof that the Soviet Union remains in existence, or certainly did as late as March 2001, a decade after it was said to have vanished into the trashcan of history. No surprise, but nice to prove it.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice are comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor’s study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing global financial corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Just press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

• The Editor’s $35,000 Wanta bail-out money has been stolen.

• See the second white panel for details of our latest distributed intelligence publications.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the Internet Security Solution software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and our ‘politically incorrect’ intelligence books online from this website.

THE SOLUTION TO THE CRISIS THAT HAS BEEN AVAILABLE ALL ALONG:
Operating the $ Refunding from London without US Government participation delivers:

(1) Massive ongoing windfall tax accruals to the BRITISH Treasury given that all funds resident in the United Kingdom jurisdiction for 24 hours are taxable by the Inland Revenue. This makes the UK Refunding proposal of extreme interest to Her Majesty’s Government and the UK Treasury.

((2) Massive ongoing windfall benefits to the UNITED STATES Treasury given that it will also receive a cascade of tax accruals from this independent private sector Refunding Program.

(3) The necessary refinancing of the UK and US banking systems ON THE BOOKS with no input from either Government and NO CORRESPONDING DEBT CREATED IN THE BACKGROUND.

(4) GOOD (i.e., on-balance sheet, taxed) money which will CHASE OUT THE BAD MONEY that the crass US Fraudulent Finance concoction will generate.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

POSSIBLE RATIONALE FOR AIR FRANCE 447 DISASTER
Initially, French authorities reacting to the loss of Air France 447 on Monday 1st June with 228 people on board, suggested that the aircraft had broken up in the course of a terrible electrical storm. Later, they conspicuously refrained from ruling out sabotage.

By the weekend of 6-7 June, it was being reported that the huge oil slick that had been identified earlier was now thought not to have been associated with the disappearance of the Airbus A330. If an explosion took place, there would be no oil slick.

On the other hand, since the oil in question was diesel oil, reports that a diesel-powered submarine may have launched a missile at the aircraft, as happened with TWA-800, when an Iranian submarine was suspected, are not to be dismissed – especially as France despatched a nuclear submarine to the area – we speculate, to search for the submarine in order to establish whether it was German or Iranian. The Iranians would have a motive, as France under President Sarkozy has ceased supply Iran with plutonium for its nuclear programme.

If the Iranians have demonstrated that they can destroy a French airliner, they could do so again. On the other hand, if the submarine is one of the German refurbished diesel fleet, the immediate consequences for the already (see previous reports) fractured Franco-German alliance, based on the timeless Treaty of the Elysée of January 1963, could be momentous.

Tensions between France, the United States, Germany and Britain are at an all-time high due to the chaotic and hideous struggle over the money, which has progressively eroded and destabilised all dimensions of these powers’ bilateral and broader relationships.

In the absence of an official list of passengers, we were able during the week ending 5th June to establish that passengers included Eric Heine, a senior executive of the German steel corporation Thyssen-Krupp, several executives from Michelin’s South American operations, and a 25-year-old relative of Portuguese Royalty.

On 2nd June it emerged that Michael ‘Butch’ Harris, a top geologist with Oklahoma City-based Devon Energy Corporation and his wife Anne, had been on the aircraft. A spokesman for the company, Chip Minty, confirmed that Harris was a geologist working out of Devon’s Rio de Janeiro office. The late Mr Harris had moved to Brazil from Houston in July 2008, according to Mrs Harris’s sister, Mary Riley, of Lafayette, LA, in an interview with the local newspaper, The Advertiser. The couple, married for 16 years, were originally from Lafayette and had lived there until 2004.

Mr Harris was a Clemson graduate and a brilliant geologist. The ‘Jack 2’ well drilled in the Walker Ridge area of the Gulf of Mexico 175 miles off the coast of Louisiana, is located in about 7,000 ft. of water. Chevron, which has a 50% stake in the oilfield, has two partners for this project, both of which have a 25% stake: Statoil ASA (Norway), and Devon Energy Corporation of Oklahoma City.

Fadel Gheit, an analyst with Oppenheimer & Co., said on 4th June that ‘relative to its size, Devon has one of the greatest exposures to the deepwater Gulf of Mexico’. Devon’s shares rose by about 15% on the New York Stock Exchange following news about the ‘Jack 2’ oilfield.

Before moving to Brazil, Michael ‘Butch’ Harris and his wife Anne lived in the Woodlands area of Houston, which ‘just happens’ to be where George Herbert Walker Bush lives.

We ‘speculate’ that Mr Harris was en route from Rio de Janeiro to Paris where he was to realise a brief from Bush Sr. to leverage Devon Energy Corporation’s 25% stake in the ‘Jack 2’ oilfield with the corrupt ‘Kissinger-Bush’ bank, Paribas, for an enormous credit line, enabling the desperate Bush Crime Family to ‘start over’ with a pile of cash for the usual leveraging and hypothecation purposes. We further ‘speculate’ that Air France 447 was sabotaged, to close off this option.

That George Bush Sr. would have no compunction in arranging for one of his associates to run the risk of being murdered in mid-air given that the whole world (with the sole exception of the crime network’s remaining cornered assets) is intent upon removing the Bush Crime Family from the chessboard, goes without saying.

The sole motivation of this criminal group operating outside and within the US Intelligence Power, the White House and the Treasury, has all along been to retain control of the levers of Fraudulent Finance at all costs, without regard for collateral damage. Given the unconscionable level of their arrogance, these people never expected to encounter any opposition to their activities, and have accordingly received the overdue shock of their lives.

BLOWS RAIN DOWN UPON THE CRIMINAL ELEMENTS
Among the most recent shocks applied to these criminal operatives, the following developments were confirmed to us on 5th June and have subsequently been spontaneously reconfirmed twice:

• Bush 41, Clinton 42 and Bush 43 and US Chief Justice John Roberts were told that they would all be arrested if there was any further interference in the Settlements process. We were advised that heavy documentation is associated with this statement.

• Criminal former President Bush 41 and his wife Barbara Pierce Bush (illegitimate daughter of the late British intelligence operative and Satanist, Aleister Crowley) were instructed by enforcement to ‘pack light’ (i.e. to place necessary clothes and toiletries only, in two small suitcases) so that they would be ready to be conveyed to jail at a moment’s notice. Recall from the preceding report that on 24th May 2009, Bush 41’s passport was taken away from him,

• Dr Henry Kissinger has been and is being accompanied at all times by two Interpol agents with instructions to arrest him immediately and take him into high security custody, in the event that he attempts to intervene in the Settlements process. These agents are not for Kissinger’s protection.

• President Obama, faced with the issuance of a Contempt of Court Writ by the World Court following a two-day extension granted on 1st June, which was the value date originally ‘agreed’, finally became ‘upset’ (the word used by our sources), and exerted himself against forces standing in the way of the Settlements process, given that the World Court proceedings could lead to the arrest of the President of the United States himself.

• An unknown number of senior US Army and Air Force personnel were arrested during the week ending Friday 5th June.

• The ‘Connecticut Trustee’ (group) obtained access to ‘their’ funds in the evening of Thursday 4th June 2009. However access was subsequently denied, the explanation given to us being that no parties may draw funds down until arrangements for subsequent recipients have been completed. [This information was ‘good’ up to 6th June but cannot be further elaborated upon given lack of updated information at the time this report was being prepared].

• With the same batch of information, the following assertion was included: ‘Next time people lie to [the Editor of this service], THEY will be liable to be arrested and jailed/indicted for disseminating false information’.

• We stress as follows:
ALL of the above intelligence has been RECONFIRMED TWICE by impeccable sources.

According to separate reports, a key Trustee failed to appear at a bank in Dallas in accordance with instructions at 1:00 pm Texas time on Thursday 4th June, in a move thought to have represented a delaying tactic. An earlier report to the same effect was also received.

The same Trustee was reported to us not to have had his paperwork ready on Monday 1st June, when he asked for more time. However on 6th the Trustee was duly escorted to the bank by US Marshals and was reported to be in the bank at 2:00pm Texas time on that date.

Finally, the criminal compartments, including we presume US Treasury operatives such as Timothy Geithner, the Bush and Clinton cadres, Leon Panetta and the ruthless fools inside the CIA and the rogue military elements, were, on 5th June, decisively rebuffed along the lines of (as it was put to us): ‘Who are you to destroy the American and world economies and to fling the American people into poverty?’. In other words, dare we say it, the message preached by this service and Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., has finally been accepted as realistic and sound – in the context of the ever more relentless thrashing that has been administered, and continues to be administered, to the criminal snakeheads who have tried to consolidate their hijacking of the whole of humanity in their lust to retain control of geomasonic Fraudulent Finance.

As late as Saturday 6th June, several operatives tried to block the progressing Settlements process, and were ‘dealt with’, according to reliable reports. There have also been unconfirmed reports of ‘horizontalisations’ and other drastic measures in the above overall context and within the timeframe referenced here.

EARLIER INTELLIGENCE RECEIVED [DIARY FORMAT]
Prior to receipt and confirmation of the foregoing data, the Editor obtained the following updates:

• The British head of State and Chinese Elders/authorities were reported to be working in ‘lock-step’ to insist upon the application of the Rule of Law inter alia through the World Court. We now believe that the primary momentum for resolution has been directed all along by Her Majesty The Queen and her special representatives.

It is likely that this momentum was greatly intensified following the stealing of The Queen’s gold on 29th-30th March 2007 which this service alone reported, and the subsequent scandal involving the misapplication of sovereign LOAN funds provided on 19th-20th June 2007 via the Bank of England to Bank of New York Mellon: [see reports: Archive], which had to be placed into ‘lockdown’ (10th-12th September 2008) inter alia after advice by the Editor of this service on 6th September 2008.

Prospective access to these LOAN funds was finally denied, again on our recommendation, on 29th January 2009, after the new Obama Administration had reneged on Barack Obama’s undertakings, signed during his earlier trip across Europe, to procure the Settlements without further ado and to allow the Refunding of the US Dollar System to proceed in a fully transparent taxable manner in the private sector with no US Government input and control. [Government creates debt only: it cannot generate taxable accruals. The private sector generates taxable income].

• On 27th May and again on 4th June 2009, the Editor received unsolicited voicemails from a party located geographically close to where Wanta resides, demanding cooperation in respect of matters with which the Editor has no interest or competence.

• On 27th May the Editor received an unsolicited voicemail from a man who said he was from China, with an Australian accent, and who said he was engaged in a prosecution through the UK Courts concerning certain assets, and wanted to meet the Editor as ‘we have certain information which you will find of interest and you may have information which we may find of interest’ (the usual, standard approach). On investigation it transpired that this person may be the son of Leo Wanta’s erstwhile Chinese ‘partner’, Howie Kwong Kok, who has Australian connections and is believed to have been brought up in Australia.

• 29th May: A significant number of associates of George Bush Sr. and of Dr Henry Kissinger were reported to have been arrested on Thursday and Friday 28th/29th May.

• 30th May: The Bushes and Clintons were all informed that if they dare to step in the way of resolution, they could all expect very severe retribution from which the specific prospect of ‘horizontalisation’ was reportedly not excluded.

• 30th May: A massive movement of funds between the Bank of America, Charlotte, and the Bank of America, Dallas, was reported to us to have occurred between noon on Saturday 30th May and noon on Sunday 31st May.

During this period, probably in order to distract the Editor and associates:

• The Editor’s main production computer suddenly became unstable, as had occurred once earlier during a period of extreme tension associated with this crisis. The Editor managed to save the files he was working on to four separate media, and closed down the computer. Next morning, at start-up, the hard disk was not recognised. A day was then wasted with IT assistants unable to ascertain the problem. A further day of the Editor’s time was wasted on Tuesday 2nd June; and after some consultants had been dismissed and replaced by another tech supplier, the problem was at once identified. The computer in question was finally restored in working order on Thursday 4th June. This would be of no outside interest were it not for the following facts which later came to light:

• One of the Editor’s special correspondents who has followed these issues very closely and has collaborated daily with us, experienced a complete primary computer failure which was reported to us during the same week.

• Another party, not in touch with the Editor but in touch with others of relevance in this context, experienced severe telecommunications disruptions during the same period.

• 1st June: Former President George W. Bush (43) was reported to be ‘on suicide watch’ which, being interpreted, was taken to mean ‘suicidED watch’.

• 1st June: George Bush Sr. was reported to be adamantly refusing, as usual, to cooperate: ‘You know who to talk to’, he was reported as shouting (presumably a reference to the Bush/Clinton stooge Leon Panetta, Director of Central Intelligence). In the face of this crude display of Bushite intransigence, enforcement personnel were reported to us to have shown Bush Sr. a number of statements from ‘his’ bank accounts. According to our sources, the amounts shown on these statements read: $0.00.

From subsidiary questioning, the Editor then established the likelihood that some of these bank statements would have been issued by one or more of the German banks acting as custodians of Bush Sr.’s funny money accounts, over which Chancellor Angela Merkel, bribed by Bush Sr. to guard ‘his’ financial interests within the German banking jurisdiction, was supposed to have exercised surveillance, as previously reported.

• 3rd June 2009: The World Court Contempt Writ first mentioned to us after the 1st June value date was ‘missed’, was confirmed to be issued on Thursday 4th June against President B. Obama in the obstruction of justice context previously explained by this service.

• 3rd June: Bush Sr. was reported to be engaged in hyperactive, vituperative behaviour in frantic moves to recoup the situation from his perspective, demanding that payments must be blocked, and telling anyone who would listen: ‘Can’t pay, won’t pay’.

• A key source told the Editor; ‘From what I hear, not a lot of people are listening’.

DISCONNECT AT THE U.S. TREASURY
The continued reprobate behaviour of the US Treasury is one of the darker mysteries that has not yet been fully explained, given that everything the Geithner Treasury is doing contravenes the principles of commonsense and sound finance.

Our key sources have confirmed that foreign governments have generally been stunned by, and unable to comprehend, the quite extraordinarily bovine behaviour of the Geithner-led delegation during their recent visit to Peking, which ended in Geithner’s humiliation (in a repetition of what happened to the equally unpopular Henry M. Paulson on several similar occasions).

Unbelievably, Geithner et al presented the Chinese with a proposal for a trading operation using $4.0 trillion – just as John Snow and Henry M. Paulson had done earlier. It will be recalled that the $4.5 trillion brought over in May 2006 from the People’s Bank of China following a visit to Peking by the criminal operative Dr Alan Greenspan and John Snow, the former US Treasury Secretary, was placed under contract (with the Chinese) in June 2006. These funds were then criminally replicated by the usual leveraging and hypothecation means, to yield multiple trillions.

Evidently the Geithner Treasury thought it could ‘pull’ the same trick with the Chinese in May/June 2009. However, with their fingers badly burned on multiple occasions by these duplicitous Jewish Americans, the Chinese turned the offer down and sent Geither packing with ‘a flea in his ear’ (or, as London East-enders would say ‘GBH of the ‘ear-’ole’ [Grievous Bodily Harm of the Ear-hole].

It appears that, following a leak, loose talk and sabotage attributed to a renegade British-based possible double agent, the US Treasury operatives thought they could pre-empt, replicate and displace, by means of a bilateral deal with the Chinese, the G-7-approved Refunding Programme (that is to be operated through London without US official input and control).

They reckoned without the central reality of the close collaboration and lock-step determination of the British Head of State and the relevant Chinese parties that there are to be no changes to the revised agreed arrangements.

The Chinese rejected the US Treasury’s proposed $4.0 trillion trading contract when (inevitably) they discovered that the funds were compromised; and Geithner was accordingly advised that it would be prudent for him and his delegation to leave the Chinese capital forthwith [see above].

The US Treasury is now engaged in TALF-4 – representing the FOURTH phase of its operation to try to regalvanise the moribund Fraudulent Finance sector, as lusted after by the recalcitrant Wall Street institutions, in defiance of logic but in response to the greed of certain banks (which might otherwise be surplus to the real economy’s requirements), and of US holders of high office.

The US Treasury is therefore persisting with its obtuse, perverse intent to revive the derivatives sector that collapsed as a direct consequence of the events of 10th-12th September 2008 (as a result of which the Editor received, on 18th September, the three-gunshot voicemail). It was no coincidence, either, that the most vitriolic attack on the Editor of this service perpetrated by one of the CIA-controlled disinformation and confusion-building websites occurred on 13th September.

[As previously reported here, data based on Bank for International Settlements’ (BIS) findings, published by the International Monetary Fund in April 2009, showed that the total notional market value of all derivatives contracts outstanding at the end of June 2008 (taking account of double-counting) stood at an estimated $683.7 trillion, leveraged from an actual gross market value of just $20.4 trillion. However given the ‘events of September 2008’, the derivatives sector was sharply reduced for the first time, to $592 trillion by the end of December 2008, according to a BIS report released on 18th May 2009. This first-ever decline brought the aggregate notional value of global derivatives contracts outstanding back close to the level of $595.3 trillion at end- December 2007].

‘MAINSTREAM’ NOW USING THE WORD ‘CRIMINAL’
That the US Treasury’s intellectual, moral and practical perversity in this crisis has now at long last been grasped at least by the New York media, was revealed in a Wall Street Journal article by Barry Grey dated 4th June, which contained inter alia the following observations:

‘Under the guise of enhanced regulation, the Obama Administration is working with major Wall Street banks to sanction a continuation of the speculative practices that precipitated the financial meltdown and the deepest economic slump since the Great Depression’.

This behaviour flies of course in the face of the specific proposals authored by Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., the US securities expert, in two presentations repeatedly published on this website and in our financial journal International Currency Review, in which we tore to shreds the Geithner and Paulson proposals.

However, in a petty gesture before leaving office, Henry M. Paulson saw to it that the subscription to International Currency Review held by the US Treasury since 1970, was cancelled – indicating that US Treasury officials do not wish the minds of their staff to be polluted by sound finance and common sense, given the disturbed nights that honest Treasury officials might be liable to suffer by comparing our sound financial proposals with their funny money ‘solutions’ that aren’t working.

The Wall Street Journal article dated 4th June continued:

‘Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has, according to a detailed exposé published May 1 by The New York Times, adopted a proposal drawn up by a group of Wall Street firms for new regulations on the lucrative trade in derivatives such as Credit Default Swaps. Geithner headed the New York Federal Reserve Bank and played a key rôle in the Bush II Administration’s bank bailout program before being named to his present post by Obama. His recently issued proposal on derivatives regulation, in opposition to measures backed by certain corporate interests, such as agribusiness firms and Congressmen who represent them, would exempt most trading in Credit Default Swaps from any serious public exposure or government regulation’.

‘Credit Default Swaps are contracts agreed to between corporations in which the seller insures the buyer against the default of specific corporate bonds or securities. The transactions are ‘over the counter’, i.e., arrived at privately without being listed on any public exchange. Since the passage of a law in 2000 supported and signed by then-President Clinton, they have been unregulated’.

This legislation triggered ‘an explosive growth of this form of financial gambling’.

Under the Geithner proposals, a ‘special dispensation’ is meant to apply to so-called ‘customized’ derivatives, a vague term that comprises most Credit Default Swaps, which would shield them from public scrutiny or government regulation’. This and other permissive ideas were incorporated into the current proposals for ‘increased’ oversight promoted by Geithner.

The article added that The New York Times had quoted Yra Harris, an independent commodities trader, as having summed up the situation as follows (this being of course entirely consistent with our own analysis):

‘The banks want to go back to business as usual – and then some. And they have a lot of audacity now that everyone has bailed them out. But we have to begin with the premise that Wall Street doesn’t want transparency because more transparency means less immediate profits’.

‘The instrument through which the banks are resuming at full throttle the criminal methods that have brought the US and world economy to its knees and inflicted growing social misery on the working class, is the Obama Administration’.

• Now, who would ever have imagined that there would come a time when the leading ‘mainstream’ newspapers in New York would at long last openly characterise the financial methods that are at the root of this crisis as CRIMINAL, as we have done these past three years?

• And who would ever have predicted that the leading New York ‘mainstream’ press would finally come to agree with us that the reason that sound finance is being rejected by the idiots in the driving seat is that practitioners of these CRIMINAL METHODS, abhor and fear TRANSPARENCY?

Which, of course, is precisely why the Group of Seven-Approved Refunding Programme, which is to be 100% TRANSPARENT, with the proceeds subject to taxation rather than being stashed untaxed in secret offshore bank accounts, is now to be operated wholly out of London, where the misguided Geithners, Paulsons, Bernankes and Dick Cheneys of this ‘Black’ world cannot interfere – and with Basel-II/Basel-III compliant UK and European banks exclusively, likely to be selected to participate in the programme because the big American banks have so consistently demonstrated throughout this crisis that, like the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve, they cannot be trusted.

PERVERSE INTENT TO REVIVE AND CONTINUE THE FRAUDULENT FINANCE CAROUSEL
So it is now glaringly obvious from all key quarters on both sides of the Atlantic that, following the obtuse lead of the wrong-headed US Treasury, the international financial community is dead-set on seeking the revival of the corrupt derivatives sector and the Fraudulent Finance trade operations underpinning it, without regard for the extreme dangers that will arise from the continuation of this criminal and speculative off-balance sheet trading.

Notwithstanding the power of this website, and the publicity we have given to the sound proposals developed by the US securities expert Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. – the most qualified technician in this specialist area who has not been compromised (and who would be a trillionaire by now had he succumbed on many occasions earlier) – the reprobate intention of the Wall Street institutions and the likes of Barclays Bank, Deutsche Bank, Paribas and the multiple other corrupted financial institutions including the Israeli banks which have brought the world to the brink of financial and economic disaster in their relentless pursuit of fiat profit, is to revert, as The Wall Street Journal has at last understood, to CRIMINAL ‘business as usual’.

For this reason, there is extreme concern in the relevant circles at the fact that the Refunding Programme, which was to have been run out of the United States, has been switched to London, where it will be operated exclusively in the private sector and in a 100% transparent manner, with all accruals subject to tax in the United Kingdom – as well as in the United States (via the profits earned on the intended trades by Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.).

Since the operation will be entirely transparent, and the resulting taxable banked deposits will be placed ONTO the recipient banks’ books rather than stashed offshore in secret bank accounts to evade tax, as has been the norm, the resulting accruals will represent GOOD MONEY in the proper sense of the term – which will, by definition, assume ‘seniority’ over speculative trading accruals transacted illegally in accordance with the criminal ‘business as usual’ routine.

• FACT: The momentum for Settlement has been driven by jealousy and anger at the intended London-based Refunding Programme which will have no US Government input, so that it will proceed outside the intermeddling control of the US authorities. Recall that the motivation behind the scenes all along has been to RETAIN CONTROL OF TRADING.

The Geithner Treasury is pursuing the WRONG POLICIES for the primary and overriding reason that it seeks to retain control and cannot tolerate the prospect of losing it.

• FACT: As repeatedly stated here, Government, by definition, cannot generate taxable income. It can of itself only create DEBT. Taxable income can ONLY be generated by the private sector. The Government cannot tax itself (other than via the remuneration of its employees).

Therefore, the US Treasury’s policy of inventing convoluted mechanisms which have the objective of enabling it to retain control of trading, is perverse and represents a gross fraud perpetrated on the American taxpayer – since a corresponding mountain of new debt appears on the other side of the Treasury’s balance sheet.

This behaviour is correctly describable as FINANCIAL TERRORISM and we hereby again denounce it as such. The British Treasury have adopted a similar derivatives-centric stance.

Indeed, the point we made recently about the UK Treasury paying huge sums of money for advice from tainted City-based institutions, to guide the Treasury’s response to the mayhem caused by those same criminalist institutions, has now been confirmed by Lord Oakshott of Seagrove Bay, the Liberal Democrats’ Treasury spokesman, who is cited in The Times of 8th June 2009, in a Business Section article by correspondent Suzy Jagger entitled ‘City Banks send the Treasury a £9m bill for advice on solving the financial crisis’, as saying:

‘Taxpayers are paying through the nose for Treasury officials’ ignorance of how the City [of London] works. From my experience of dealing with them in connection with the nationalisation of Northern Rock, it is matched only by the arrogance’.

‘Because the Treasury has no core expertise, it has been running in desperation to the City which is not able to give proper independent advice. Many of these investment banks were on the one hand creating the toxic investments which made the crisis much worse, and on the other hand taking fees to get us out of it’.

• PRECISELY.

MACROFINANCIAL ASSESSMENT AND PROSPECTS
Asia-based analysts are pointing out that the size of the ‘hidden’ US financial bubble that has burst is so colossal that actual losses cannot be quantified, given the lack of transparency.

For several decades, the US banks, operating within the context that the Federal Reserve has one asset alone – the power to print money without limit – ‘went global’, issuing debt instruments to foreigners for proprietary ‘over-the-counter’ (private, unrecorded) speculative trading operations and investment – over-leveraging their base capital by several dozen times.

This ‘easy money’ policy, associated with the low interest rate policy pursued during the loose Greenspan era, created a bubble economy without historical precedent – against the background that the untaxed, off-balance sheet trading operations were ballooning the overall (unquantified) dollar money supply, with ongoing inflationary consequences.

Since Nixon and Bush Sr. implemented the long-range German strategy of de-industrialising ‘the Main Enemy’, starting in the early 1970s, the United States and Britain have both foolishly walked away from manufacturing, shifting the ‘productive’ economic focus towards consumption and the parasitical financial services feeding on the underlying inflationary environment – backed by the United States’ temporary privilege of being able to issue currency that foreigners were prepared to accumulate and hold. The US dollar was floated worldwide, functioning as the de facto medium of international transactions at virtually zero cost to the United States. Against this background, US consumers went on a consumption binge, enhancing their already high standard of living.

When the Editor first became ‘hands-on’ engaged in aspects of this crisis, he warned several parties (whose eyes duly glazed over) that this process could not continue for ever as there is no free lunch: and that when it ran into a brick wall, the shock would be devastating, with the real prospect that US living standards could collapse by 50% within a matter of months – as foreigners refused to accumulate more dollars and dollar-denominated assets, sought to dump those they already held, and the dollar then collapsed, driving foreign currencies sharply upwards so that Americans would be unable to afford many imports.

• When that happened, the only remaining ‘remedy’ for the Federal Reserve would be to print money, leading to the inevitable hyperinflation.

Dr Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, has told Congress recently that the Fed is confident that this outcome can be avoided, without providing any back-up for this statement.

The mechanism whereby we wind up with a hyperinflation is slightly different to that envisaged when we first warned of such an outcome in our report dated 2nd September 2006 – due to the irresponsible behaviour of the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve in adopting the chronically unsound policies that will generate huge mountains of background debt that will burden many generations of Americans to come – in the absence of a hyperinflation, that is.

The dollar paper issued to foreign creditor institutions, funds and sovereign governments around the world, is becoming a vast liability. Global economic imbalances, associated with the mentioned US overconsumption, and with overproduction in key emerging market economies and Japan, are experiencing a sharp correction. The Americans over-consumed by issuing fiat debt to finance consumption, while foreign countries channelled reserves back to the United States, so that US consumers would continue to buy their cheap goods.

But since exports to the United States have collapsed, foreign creditors are wary of subscribing to new US debt, especially given their shrewd understanding that US official debt-issuance is out of control due to the fact that the US Treasury has chosen to follow the wrong course – having the US Government (and its cronies, and the Intelligence Power) involved in a resumption of the familiar criminal ‘business as usual’, against the background of technical arrangements which generate massive unnecessary Treasury ‘background debt’.

And foreign creditors understand perfectly well that this wrong-headed course is being pursued because the US Treasury and the Government’s cronies plus the CIA want to retain control of speculative trading, as though there was never any discontinuity last September.

FOREIGN CREDITORS ARE CUTTING THEIR LOSSES
Not surprisingly, foreign creditors are cutting their losses and are seeking to diversify out of US dollar-denominated holdings. As the permissive US official debt issuance proceeds, the alarm bells that have been ringing in foreign capitals will wax much louder.

It is a fact that without the contrived on-balance sheet liquidity-raising operations spawned by the Treasury and the Federal Reserve, certain banks would have collapsed – which is why well-known names are refusing depositors’ requests for large withdrawals: indeed we have heard that at least one US institution has, in recent months, required its customers to give notice when they intend to withdraw more than $10,000. All of which implies that a run on the largest banks has only narrowly been avoided. Citibank of course, like General Motors, is no longer a stock exchange name.

Participating banks were issuing fraudulent ‘bundled’ mortgage-backed securities (itself a wholly fraudulent description) and other derivative financial ‘products’ in the same way that the Federal Reserve issues currency – backed by nothing at all, and ‘supported exclusively’ by the bank’s brand name. Despite the hyped ‘recovery’ rhetoric and a probably temporary illusion of renewed prosperity fuelled by the vast issuance of liquidity to stave off collapse, the banks that have issued these dubious (fraudulent) instruments are now having to take them back: and since they lack the necessary liquidity to finance such buy-backs as the credit market has long since stalled, the US banks are having to rely on the Federal Reserve for ‘cash’.

Partly as a consequence, US Treasury instruments, previously considered risk-free (backed by the ‘Full Faith and Credit of the United States’) are now under pressure.

Several key emerging countries, including Brazil, India, Russia, China and Iran, are discussing the possibility of abandoning the US dollar as a reserve currency (a prospect fraught with practical problems: but the point is that this is being discussed).

Due to our take-down of the idea during the Spring Meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, the proposal to expand the use of the Fund’s Special Drawing Rights for this purpose flopped immediately: but the point, again, is that this development reflected international nervousness about the US dollar as the reserve currency.

The huge deficits that the Obama Administration seeks to finance cannot be funded of course by the US Treasury itself, let alone by Americans whose savings and investments lost 50% of their value over one year prior to the recent stock market recovery fuelled by the Fed’s ‘quantitative easing’ policy. There are therefore only two obvious options, as US policymakers have rejected the private sector Refunding Programme option, which would solve the entire problem once and for all: selling ever more debt to reluctant foreigners, or the domestic printing press.

The above-board Refunding Programme to be operated from London will resolve all issues, even though we know for a fact that US authorities have tried, unsuccessfully, to sabotage it. Incredible as it may appear, the US Treasury, the recalcitrant Intelligence Power and the US ‘crony community’ would prefer to destroy the US financial and real economies, and to create conditions for a 50% collapse in American living standards, rather than to yield to the impeccable logic of the private sector Refunding Programme. This is clear from the unsuccessful steps they have taken to try to redirect, amend and hijack it in recent weeks.

One of these steps involved a UK-based intermediary, working indirectly for Cheney, failing to deliver papers to the highest level in the United Kingdom, and yet representing that he did so.

Since the Treasury will not back off from the misguided course it is pursuing, under Geithner as under his criminalist predecessor, Paulson, the United States will career towards the inevitable hyperinflation – with the GOOD MONEY generated by the private sector London operation quickly gaining the upper hand so that the US Treasury will no longer need to issue debt on the open-ended basis currently planned. This is because the Treasury will, ‘whether it likes it or not’, find itself at the receiving end of the windfall dollar tax receipts that it has refused to countenance.

It seems that nothing can be done to get the US authorities to see sense, beyond the fact that the Settlements process has been driven, of late, by the real prospect of the London-based Refunding Programme. Unfortunately, given the reckless intransigence, not to mention the criminal terrorist financing tendencies, of the US Treasury, the rapid US inflation that is now anticipated by the Bank of England, the Swiss National Bank and the Bank of Japan, will wind up chasing American goods domestically, because foreign goods (including crucial ‘just-in-time’ supplies) will be uncompetitive due to the appreciation of foreign currencies against the collapsing dollar.

• So to assume that the real crisis has even started, is naïve in the extreme.

POLICY DECISIONS WITHOUT THE MISSING INPUT
Moreover it appears that policymakers have acted on the assumption that the Settlements process will never be completed (as intended by the Bush-Greenspan ‘never-pay’ model).

That the controlled media have ignored this dimension of the crisis, and our own reports as well as those published in International Currency Review, is one thing (with which we are all familiar).

But for policymakers, who know all about this central dimension of the crisis, to take decisions that appear wholly to ignore the completion of the Settlements process, is extraordinary – implying that the US Treasury’s notorious myopia, untrustworthiness and moral perversity are replicated in other financial capitals as well.

It will therefore be ‘interesting’ to see how policymakers react to the completion of the Settlements process. Frankly, all decisions taken since the crisis erupted, due to the wrong decisions adopted by the Paulson and Geithner Treasury, will have to be reviewed in the light of this ‘unexpected circumstance’ (which was ‘never supposed to happen, you understand’).

As usual, there will be an overlap while the new environment takes hold – and even as national policymakers continue to take comfort from the erroneous assumption that deflationary data is inconsistent with a hyperinflation later.

INDICATORS OF GLOBAL DEFLATION
The World Bank’s Chief economist, Justin Yifu Lin, has reported that global capacity utilisation is running at the historically low level of between 50% and 60%, implying that firms will have to keep dismissing employees, which will depress domestic consumption further. Asian trade data look awful, too: the latest monthly export figures for Malaysia, South Korea and India show year-on-year contractions of 26%, 33% and 28.3% respectively; and the share of exports in Asian Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has risen from 36% to 47% over the past decade, thereby exacerbating Asia’s fatal dependence on exports to the West.

Year-on-year deflation rates for selected countries look worse by the month:
China: – 1.5%; United States: – 0.7%; Singapore: – 0.7%; Ireland: – 3.5%; Japan: – 0.1%;
Thailand: – 3.3%; Switzerland: – 1.0%; Spain: – 0.8%; Taiwan: – 0.5%; Belgium: – 0.4%;
Sweden: – 0.1%; Germany: 0%.

According to the Association of American Railroads, traffic was 22% down in the third week of May 2009 compared with a year earlier, while Canadian rail freight was down year-on-year by 34%. The Chief Economist of the American Trucking Association has said that tonnage is down by 13% over 12 months, with monthly declines of 4.5% in March and a further 2.2% in April.

In Britain, where analysts rely inordinately on a recovery of housing prices, mortgage approvals rose for the third month running in April, to 43,000 – whereas the total volume of monthly approvals needed for UK house prices to stop declining is 80,000.

Overall, the loose talk of ‘green shoots’ is nothing more than propaganda fuelled by a slight ‘feel-better’ factor arising from the historically unprecedented orgy of ‘quantitative easing’ undertaken by central banks which were themselves heavily involved, along with huge institutions they were supposed to be supervising, in the criminal Fraudulent Finance that has been exposed. And the US Treasury wants to revert to that discredited model!

CHENEY’S NEWSMAX OPERATION CLOSED DOWN?
In the preceding report [26th May 2009] we exposed an elaborate scheme [‘the new Cheney-linked dollar-collection scheme’] to mobilise smaller US investors’ dollars via the Newsmax service which, when analysed, boiled down to the provision of two-month interest-free loans via the purchase of refundable multiple subscriptions, by gullible participants who may well have learned nothing from recent events – ‘permitting’ the investors to ‘follow’ the investment trades to be undertaken by or for the Newsmax proprietor, Christopher Ruddy, on the advice of the CIA financial operative David Frazier. We revealed that this operative works for Cheney, and that his task in the operation was to ‘free up’ ‘small money’ dollars in order to generate a pool of US dollars for exchange through the collaborating London-based US agent Dr Cynthia Dremel for the Euros stashed illegally by Cheney abroad while he was in office.

We pointed out inter alia that because this operation involved discounting the US dollar, it was de facto a fraud against the United States. It was also exposed as a form of Ponzi operation, given the incorporation of the 60-day 100% refund ‘guarantee’ which meant that if the subscriber wished, he or she could demand their money back within the 60-day period, during which time the promoters will have had the use of the subscriber’s funds interest-free, and will have been able to trade those funds for their own purposes.

• FACT: Following our exposure, nothing more has been heard of this operation.

Instead, on 6th June, Ruddy started promoting his own appearance at ‘FreedomFest’, scheduled for 9th-11th July 2009, at Bally’s in Las Vegas, to be attended by Steve Forbes and ‘my friend, Mark Skousen’. The Editor recalls that the first commentator to mention the Editor’s investigation into Fraudulent Finance (in 2003) was Mark Skousen, who pooh-poohed what we were doing, adding that ‘Christopher Story would be liable loose all his subscribers’, as a result of this investigation.

Anyway, the hassle-hassle Newsmax sales spiel promoting ‘Your Million Dollar Secret Code’ was suddenly switched from the Ponzi scheme to the urgency of needing to register at Bally’s: ‘You can book your deluxe accommodation for just $74 per night! Rooms are going fast, so register today for Newsmax’s special schedule at FreedomFest – and book your room today’.

• And for goodness sake, don’t ever mention ‘Your Million Dollar Secret Code’, please. Nope: a thick veil has been drawn over that one. Other careless CIA promoters of Ponzi schemes: please note: you may be exposed before you can even get started.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. Some versions have a ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

RELEASES OCCURRED ON 1ST MAY AS DEMANDED BY WRIT

BUT THE CUSTODIAN BANKS ARE ILLEGALLY BLOCKING TRUSTEES’ ACCESS

Thursday 7 May 2009 08:00

THE BANKS ARE OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, ARE ACTING ILLEGALLY, AND ARE IN GROSS AND BLATANT BREACH OF THEIR BASIC FIDUCIARY DUTIES AS CUSTODIANS OF THEIR CLIENT TRUSTEES’ PAID-IN FUNDS. THESE BANKS ARE PERPETRATING FINANCIAL TERRORISM:

• FUNDS WERE PLACED IN THE TRUSTEES’ ACCOUNTS ON 1ST MAY

• BUT THE CUSTODIAN BANKS HAVE SO FAR ILLEGALLY BLOCKED ACCESS TO THE FUNDS

• THE WRIT HAS THEREFORE NOT BEEN FULLY EXECUTED

• WERE THE BANKS GIVEN PERMISSION TO ACT ILLEGALLY?

• WARNING TO GEITHNER IN THE LIGHT OF THE ABOVE

• OBAMA AND GEITHNER OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE AND PERPETRATING TERRORISM

• CRIMINAL FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES AND THEIR DIRECTORS

• ENFORCEMENT TEAM CONTINUING ITS NECESSARY WORK

• THE CRIMINAL BANKS HAVE NO EXCUSE THIS TIME

• NOW WE KNOW WHY THE TRUSTEES WERE ABUSED ALL WEEKEND

• THE AIR FORCE ONE EPISODE OVER MANHATTAN

• THE CURIOUS MATTER OF THE BRIEFCASE UNDER THE TABLE

• ‘WEAPONISED PNEUMONIC OR BUBONIC PLAGUE’

• FORMER U.S. HIGH OFFICIALS CONTINUE RUNNING ‘BLACK OPS’

• WILD REPORTS BY ANONYMOUS UNPROVENANCED SOURCES

• OUTGOING BRITISH M.E.P. BLASTS THE SHAM EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

THE SOLUTION TO THE CRISIS THAT HAS BEEN AVAILABLE ALL ALONG:
Operating the $ Refunding from London without US Government participation delivers:

(1) Massive ongoing windfall tax accruals to the BRITISH Treasury given that all funds resident in the United Kingdom jurisdiction for 24 hours are taxable by the Inland Revenue. This makes the UK Refunding proposal of extreme interest to Her Majesty’s Government and the UK Treasury.

((2) Massive ongoing windfall benefits to the UNITED STATES Treasury given that it will also receive a cascade of tax accruals from this independent private sector Refunding Program.

(3) The necessary refinancing of the UK and US banking systems ON THE BOOKS with no input from either Government and NO CORRESPONDING DEBT CREATED IN THE BACKGROUND.

(4) GOOD (i.e., on-balance sheet, taxed) money which will CHASE OUT THE BAD MONEY that the crass US Fraudulent Finance concoction will generate.

• In mid-March we published: International Currency Review Volume 34, #2 on Systemic Fraudulent Finance and The Legalisation of Financial Corruption. Also published recently are issues of our titles The Latin American Times, Economic Intelligence Review, London Currency Report, Interest Rate Service and Arab-Asian Affairs. Issues of Soviet Analyst and Global Analyst are imminent.

• For details, see the second white panel on the Home Page.

• To subscribe to our intelligence services, see the catalogue under World Reports Limited.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice is comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor’s study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the Internet Security Solution software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

• DONATIONS: You can help finance these exposures (which the Editor has to prepare on top of his normal publishing responsibilities) by sending us a donation. Press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

• LEO WANTA: As you may recall, the Editor lent this operative $35,000 to extract him from what we diagnosed as fraudulent probation, due to expire on 28th November 2010. This action triggered the entire sequence of unravelling events that has followed. As a consequence, Wanta’s probation was duly shortened by five years, to expire on 14th November 2005. The private funds, which the Editor filched from the proceeds of the sale of our London house, should have been repaid on 11th June 2007 with interest, having been made available for a two-year term. The Editor has not been repaid, Mr Wanta has taken no steps to indicate to the Editor why this is the case, and has not written to explain the situation: so that, as a consequence, these funds are considered to have been stolen.

Furthermore, after the Editor made this platform available to assist Mr Wanta with his problems, he double-crossed us as revealed in our reports dated 3rd and 18th March 2008. Since then, we have had nothing whatsoever to do with this US operative. However on 6th May 2009, he took it into his head to circulate, without our permission, a copyrighted report that we published on the 18th April 2006. The Editor would like it to be known that we did not authorise the redistribution of this article and that Wanta is not permitted to steal our copyrighted works without prior permission. Should any further such breaches occur, we will reserve the right to add this further impertinence to the list of follies that this operative has committed against us, and will take measures to protect our rights.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

RELEASES TOOK PLACE ON 1ST MAY AS REQUIRED BY THE WRIT
On 1st May 2009, the necessary releases, delayed since time immemorial by the corruption of the highest US office-holders, intelligence cadres, banks and their foreign co-conspirators to defraud the rightful recipients, were paid into the Trustee accounts at the relevant US money center banks.

BUT THE CUSTODIAN BANKS HAVE SO FAR ILLEGALLY BLOCKED ACCESS TO THE FUNDS
It is now SIX days later, and the banks acting as custodians of the funds have failed to allow the Trustees into whose accounts the funds were paid, to access them – in gross, criminal breach of their fiduciary duty to enable the Trustees to take economic receipt of the funds for which they are responsible. The banks are therefore engaged in criminal obstruction of justice and terrorism.

FUNDS WERE PLACED IN THE TRUSTEES’ ACCOUNTS ON 1ST MAY
The released funds are ON THE BANKS’ BOOKS, which is the central point to bear in mind when assessing what follows. Instead of allowing the Trustees to handle their funds in accordance with instructions, the criminal enterprise banks are exploiting the existence of these funds that are now ON their books to generate new liquidity, on the working assumption that (a) they will not be held to account and (b) that the President of the United States and the Treasury Secretary will not enforce the law to bring an end to this criminal abuse and obstruction of justice.

THE WRIT HAS THEREFORE NOT BEEN FULLY EXECUTED
The World Court Writ of Execution raised by the Chinese parties and representatives of The Queen reportedly on behalf of the international community to bring an end to this American (and German) financial criminality has therefore not yet been fully enforced. The first stage – release of the funds into the Trustees’ accounts – took place as noted on 1st May 2009, thereby ‘compromising’ the war threat by the international community.

But the second stage, permitting use of the funds by the Trustees, had yet, as of this filing, to be implemented. The banks in question are custodians with fiduciary responsibility to the Trustees, and are required forthwith to place the funds live on their clients’ accounts. They have no latitude whatsoever to prevent their clients from using their funds as they see fit.

But that is not happening. Furthermore, this has been going on for the past six days.

WERE THE BANKS GIVEN PERMISSION TO ACT ILLEGALLY?
Because what they are all doing is ILLEGAL, it appears that the institutions may have been GIVEN PERMISSION TO ACT ILLEGALLY, which may implicate the US Treasury Secretary, Mr Timothy Geithner, and the President of the United States, Mr Barack Obama.

Mr Geithner can ORDER the banks to release the funds to the Trustees but, as of this posting, HE HAD NOT YET DONE SO. That means he is a co-conspirator in this OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

Why is this? Could he have been coerced? Could he have been bought off? The second possibility seems more likely, in view of the sudden appearance – out of context – of the following text at the foot of a report published by the operative Wayne Madsen on 5th May, which also mentioned the London ‘Safety Lock Box’ raids that took place on 2nd June 2008 that we have often referred to in these reports, since they ‘blew’ the geo-corruption linkages sky-high, and have triggered multiple dimensions of the unraveling process, as predicted:

‘Informed sources have told WMR (Wayne Madsen Report) that high-level rumors of a sex scandal involving the Treasury Secretary (Timothy Geithner) are swirling around both the Treasury and the Inter-American Development Bank, headquartered in Washington, DC’.

WARNING TO GEITHNER IN THE LIGHT OF THE ABOVE
Since Madsen is known to be an operative, we take this as a warning to Geithner that he is to be or is being blackmailed; and the reason for the appearance of this text out of context from the rest of the Madsen report dated 5th-6th May is that Geithner is allowing the banks to break the law and is obstructing justice – a not-so-subtle way of drawing to his attention the need for the US Treasury Secretary to reverse himself IMMEDIATELY and to order the banks to cease and desist from their illegal operations, obstruction of justice and abuse of their fiduciary duties.

OBAMA AND GEITHNER OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE AND PERPETRATING TERRORISM
More generally, since Geithner and relevant highest-level officials with the power to do so have NOT PREVENTED THE BANKS FROM ACTING ILLEGALLY, they are ALL OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE and are de facto co-conspirators in this FRAUD and breach of the Rule of Law. Therefore, they can be designated, like the criminal enterprise institutions concerned, as being themselves engaged in perpetrating financial and economic terrorism against the United States, the people of the United States and the Rest of the World, for which only the most severe measures are applicable.

Also obstructing justice and engaging in economic and financial terrorism, given their involvement in these matters, are Mrs Barbara Bush – who is stated by multiple sources to be handling Mr Bush Sr.’s affairs and interacting with the Pierce family given that Bush Sr.’s dementia is progressing fast (it is further advanced than is reported) and he has difficulty recognising his sources by name or face – Vice President Joseph Biden, William Jefferson Clinton and Mrs Hillary Rodomski Clinton.

(Having put his foot in it by stating that, given the ‘flu scare, he would not advise his family to travel on public transport, Biden made sure that cameras were on hand when he publicly appeared on 4th April at the Wilmington, Delaware, train station after riding Amtrak from Washington).

CRIMINAL FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES AND THEIR DIRECTORS
The criminal enterprise institutions that are acting illegally in breach of their fiduciary duties and obstructing justice in this respect are reported to us to include the following:

JPMorganChase, Deutsche Bank acting as clearing house for JPMorganChase, Citibank, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo.

The Directors of these institutions, being responsible to their Boards, are PERSONALLY liable along with their criminal enterprise firms, for the consequences of the crimes being committed, whether authorised by higher authority of not. That includes OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

Higher authority cannot ever authorise illegal activity – the overturning of the Rule of Law – with impunity. It may THINK it can, and the banks that are exploiting the fact that huge sums were placed ONTO THEIR BOOKS on 1st May 2009, may ASSUME that they are authorised to operate illegally, with impunity: but the price to be paid for this grotesque breach of their basic fiduciary duty and the parallel obstruction of justice will almost certainly turn out to be extremely high.

The Directors of these entities (1) are as follows:

Akamoto, Ross, Deutsche Bank AG
Al Thani, Nawaf, Deutsche Bank AG
Armstrong, C. Michael, Citigroup/Citibank
Asmarger, Regis, Deutsche Bank AG
Arzber, Thomas, Deutsche Bank AG
Augustine, Norman, Deutsche Bank AG
Baker II, John D., Wells Fargo
Barnet III, William, Bank of America
Belda, Alain J.P., Citigroup/Citibank
Binh, Pham, Deutsche Bank AG
Bock, Kurt, Deutsche Bank AG
Böhr, Wolfgang, Deutsche Bank AG
Borda, Kenneth, Deutsche Bank AG
Börsig, Clements, Deutsche Bank AG
Botelho, Mauricio, Deutsche Bank AG
Bowles, Crandall C., JPMorganChase
Bramble, Sr., Frank P., Bank of America
Braunstein, Jason, Deutsche Bank AG
Bryant, Charles, Deutsche Bank AG
Bryson, John, Deutsche Bank AG
Budzvna, John, Deutsche Bank AG
Burke, Stephen B., JPMorganChase
Capellas, Michael, Deutsche Bank AG
Cardoso, Fernando, Deutsche Bank AG
Cash Jr., James, Deutsche Bank AG
Casjens, Günther, Deutsche Bank AG
Chandler, Edward, Deutsche Bank AG
Chen, John S., Wells Fargo
Colbert, Virgis W., Bank of America
Collins, John T., Bank of America
Conroy, Kathryn, Deutsche Bank AG
Cote, David M. JPMorganChase
Countryman, Gary L., Bank of America
Crown, James S., JPMorganChase
Cunningham Keith, Deutsche Bank AG
Dean, Lloyd H., Wells Fargo
Deering, Anthony, Deutsche Bank AG
Deutch, John M., Citigroup/Citibank
Dimon, James, JPMorganChase
Dunham, Archie, Deutsche Bank AG
Eick, Karl-Erhard, Deutsche Bank AG
Fallon, Robert, Deutsche Bank AG
Förster, Heldrum, Deutsche Bank AG
Fortabat, Maria de, Deutsche Bank AG
Franks, Tommy R., Bank of America
Futter, Ellen V., JPMorganChase
Gifford, Charles K., Bank of America
Gray, III, William H., JPMorganChase
Griswold IV, Benjamin, Deutsche Bank AG
Grundhofer, Jerry A., Citigroup/Citibank
Guzman, Nicolas, Deutsche Bank AG
Hashimoto, Toru, Deutsche Bank AG
Herling, Alfred, Deutsche Bank AG
Hernandez, Jr., Enrique, Wells Fargo
Herzberg, Gerd, Deutsche Bank AG
Howell, William, Deutsche Bank AG
Idei, Nobuyuki, Deutsche Bank AG
Iglesias, Enrique, Deutsche Bank AG
Jackson, Jr., Laban P., JPMorganChase
James, Donald M., Wells Fargo
Jeffe, Robert, Deutsche Bank AG
Job, KBE, Peter, Deutsche Bank AG
Johnson, Robert, Deutsche Bank AG
Joss, Robert L., Wells Fargo
Kaden, Lewis B. Citigroup/Citibank
Kagermann, Henning, Deutsche Bank AG
Kangas, Edward, Deutsche Bank AG
Kappes, Hans-Peter, Deutsche Bank AG
Khan, Rafi, Deutsche Bank AG
Klee, Martina, Deutsche Bank AG
Kley, Karl-Ludwig, Deutsche Bank AG
Kovacevich, Richard M., Wells Fargo
Kuczynski, Pedro-Pablo, Deutsche Bank AG
Labarge, Suzanne, Deutsche Bank AG
Lee, Gang-Yon, Deutsche Bank AG
Lévy, Maurice, Deutsche Bank AG
Lewis, Kenneth D., Bank of America
Li, David, Deutsche Bank AG
Liveris, Andrew N., Citigroup/Citibank
Lozano, Monica C., Bank of America
Luengas, François, Deutsche Bank AG
Mark, Henriette, Deutsche Bank AG
Marram, Ellen, Deutsche Bank AG
Martin, Lynn, Deutsche Bank AG
Massey, Walter E., Bank of America
May, Robert, Deutsche Bank AG
May, Thomas J., Bank of America
McCormick, Richard D., Wells Fargo
McDonald, Mackey J., Wells Fargo
Mer, Francis, Deutsche Bank AG
Milligan, Cynthia H., Wells Fargo
Mitchell, Georgina, Deutsche Bank AG
Mitchell, Patricia E., Bank of America
Montova, Miguel, Deutsche Bank AG
Moore, Nicholas G., Wells Fargo
Mordashov, Aleksey, Deutsche Bank AG
Moriarty, Rich, Deutsche Bank AG
Mulcahy, Anne, Citigroup/Citibank
Neubart, Garrett, Deutsche Bank AG
Nocvak, David C., JPMorganChase
Oetker, August, Deutsche Bank AG
O’Neill, Michael E., Citigroup/Citibank
Pagani, Luis, Deutsche Bank AG
Pandit, Vikram, Citigroup/Citibank
Parsons, Richard D., Citigroup/Citibank
Pfeiffer, Eckhard, Deutsche Bank AG
Phelps, Michael, Deutsche Bank AG
Pina, Antonio, Deutsche Bank AG
Pischetsrieder, Bernd, Deutsche Bank AG
Platscher, Gabriele, Deutsche Bank AG
Prueher, Joseph W., Bank of America
Qingyuan, Li, Deutsche Bank AG
Quigley, Philip J., Wells Fargo
Ramadorai, S., Deutsche Bank AG
Raymond, Lee R., JPMorganChase
Rhodes, Bill, Citigroup/Citibank
Ricciardi, Lawrence R., Citigroup/Citibank
Rice, Donald B., Wells Fargo
Rodin, Judith, Citigroup/Citibank
Rogowski, Michael, Deutsche Bank AG
Rossotti, Charles O., Bank of America
Ruck, Karin, Deutsche Bank AG
Runstad, Judith M., Wells Fargo
Ryan, Charles, Deutsche Bank AG
Ryan, Robert L., Citigroup/Citibank
Ryan, Thomas M., Bank of America
Sada, Armando, Deutsche Bank AG
Samuelsson, Hakan, Deutsche Bank AG
Sanger. Stephen W., Wells Fargo
Santomero, Anthony M., Citigroup/Citibank
Schaeffer, Maria-Elisabeth, Deutsche Bank AG
Siegert, Theo, Deutsche Bank AG
Sloan Jr, O. Temple, Bank of America
Snow, John, Deutsche Bank AG
Steel, Robert K., Wells Fargo
Stumpf, John G., Wells Fargo
Svenson, Susan G., Wells Fargo
Tan, Keng Yamc, Deutsche Bank AG
Teyssen, Johannes, Deutsche Bank AG
Thieme, Marlehn, Deutsche Bank AG
Thompson, Jr., William S., Citigroup/Citibank
Thumann, Jürgen, Deutsche Bank AG
Tillman, Robert L., Bank of America
Todenhöfer, Tilman, Deutsche Bank AG
Toth, Devin, Deutsche Bank AG
Unuvar, Ahmet, Deutsche Bank AG
Urrutia, Miguel, Deutsche Bank AG
Volk, Stephen, Citigroup/Citibank
Wanandi, Sofjan, Deutsche Bank AG
Ward, Jackie M., Bank of America
Weatherill, Lucas, Deutsche Bank AG
Weldon, William C., JPMorganChase
Wenning, Werner, Deutsche Bank AG
Wolfe, Louis, Deutsche Bank AG
Wunderlich, Leo, Deutsche Bank AG
Yunling, Zhang, Deutsche Bank AG
Zetsche, Dieter, Deutsche Bank AG
Zhang, Lee, Deutsche Bank AG

ENFORCEMENT TEAM CONTINUING ITS NECESSARY WORK
The enforcement team headed by Swiss personnel cooperating with foreign government cadres to enforce execution of the World Court’s Writ of Execution continues, we understand, to deploy all means available to procure compliance with the Writ of Execution. Arrests and ‘neutralisations’ have continued unabated for the past several weeks.

Since the enforcement team is NOT free to leave the job half done – as discussed in the preceding report, failure to execute the Writ of Execution is not an option for the team’s members: otherwise they themselves will become co-conspirators in the obstruction of justice – this heightened crisis environment will continue until resolution.

Logic would therefore suggest that ALL Directors of the criminal enterprise institutions engaged in this fraudulent tapping of the paid-in funds, breach of fiduciary duty and obstruction of justice are vulnerable to whatever measures the enforcement team unilaterally decides to take in order to fulfil its instructions and to procure completion of its allotted task – which means compelling these very arrogant and recalcitrant institutions and their Directors, to meet their fiduciary obligations.

THE CRIMINAL BANKS HAVE NO EXCUSE THIS TIME
In the past, criminalist officials and bankers have enjoyed playing the disinformation game of ‘it’s not my fault’: but this option is precluded now because the institutions concerned are all overtly engaged in maximising the accruals to be leveraged off the funds that are sitting on their books in the Trustees’ accounts, which is illegal. The big US banks are in gross breach of standard banking conduct, which means that, as we have often argued in the past, they cannot be trusted to carry out instructions – which further means that anyone dealing with the identified giga-institutions may be risking the loss of control over any funds they handle.

Moreover by depriving the countries and Trustees of their rightful funds while these banks pursue their own selfish interests and obstruction of justice contrary to their fiduciary duty to their clients, the banks have reconfirmed that they are indeed criminal enterprises.

And by condoning this latest appalling breach of banking standards, the Rule of Law, and of trust, President Obama, George Bush 41 and Mrs Barbara Bush et al are active participants in blocking the releases and in obstructing justice – a state of affairs that reflects a reckless degree of risk-taking arrogance that the Rest of the World has come to associate with the pariah nation called the United States of America, and which is liable to lead to a progressive degradation of international relations in the context of open economic warfare built on a substructure of the red-hot internal and external intelligence war which is in turn reflected in the irresponsible lies and diversionary reports churned out by notorious US controlled disinformation outlets.

NOW WE KNOW WHY THE TRUSTEES WERE ABUSED ALL WEEKEND
The foregoing throws new light on why the Trustees were kept at the banks from Friday 1st May through to Monday 4th May, when, as previously reported, a shoot-out occurred, killing two Federal officers. These tensions erupted because instead of allowing the Trustees to access their funds in accordance with their fiduciary obligations, the corrupt banks blocked access and embarked upon another round of exotic financing operations using the money that was now sitting ON THEIR BOOKS as base. In other words, when the releases finally occurred, they ‘pulled another one’.

As noted above, they must have been told that they could proceed to break the law; and this clearance to act illegally could ONLY have come from the highest levels. But as we all know, compliance with an illegal order does not absolve the perpetrator from responsibility at all. The banks that are acting illegally and are obstructing justice are legally as well as criminally liable.

THE AIR FORCE ONE EPISODE OVER MANHATTAN
The episode involving one of the Air Force One planes over Manhattan on 27th April now turns out to have been far more serious than has hitherto been explained, and can be read several ways, including the possibility that it may reflect a deep schism in the bowels of the US official structures.

Although F-16s always take up the lock-on position at the tail of the target aircraft, it is also true that when the fighter aircraft is directly on the tail of a target plane, that is a military position for a shoot-down. If the F-16’s Stinger missile had been released, the US President’s aircraft would have been destroyed. (There were in fact two F-16s present),

If that assumption is correct, the reason for the extraordinary manoeuvres of the Air Force One may have been that the presidential plane had to fly close to the buildings where the warmth emitted from the windows could interfere with the Stinger missile, which is heat-seeking.

On this analysis, the presidential plane shown in the videos was being lined up to be shot down by one of the F-16s, which, by extrapolation may have been given actual instructions to destroy the presidential plane unless it returned to the Washington area. The intention had been for the plane to land at LaGuardia Airport.

Although President Obama was reported to be elsewhere in the country on 27th April, he is known to have a double, thought to be a brother, who is slightly darker but can be ‘touched up’ with the application of those careful make-up skills deployed by the specialists hired from Hollywood for this purpose (see earlier posting). According to an unconfirmed report, it is possible that the purpose of the flight of the plane from the Air Force One fleet was for Obama secretly to attend a meeting at Citibank at which George H. W. Bush Sr. was thought to be present. Any such meeting would have needed to take place at the bank.

In which case, to take this hypothesis to its logical conclusion, the interception of Air Force One by an armed and primed US F-16 which actually locked-on to the tail of the presidential plane ready to shoot the plane down if it did not conform with the F-16’s instructions, provides empirical evidence of something being seriously wrong at the heart of the US structures, of the order of a colossal breach between warring elements – all over the money, of course.

Even though F-16s always ‘tailgate’ like this in such circumstances, the F-16’s behaviour conforms to classic military manoeuvres, indicating at the very least here that the ‘PR pictures’ report was a spurious and feeble, albeit brazen, cover story.

There is probably a link, too, to the shoot-out that occurred in the morning of 27th April, after the country representatives had been abused all weekend long, as discussed in our report dated 29th April – again, over money, or rather the blocking of the Trustees’ access by the banks.

An alternative hypothesis would be that the episode had something to do with shoulder-mounted missiles, some of which are of Russian origin, that were reported to have been brought into New Jersey, home of the seething US component of the Russian mafiya, who ‘want to be paid’ like the Chicago elements as well. On 12th August 2008, 3 men were arrested, one at Newark and two in New York, on suspicion of seeking to procure missiles for launching against US airliners.

That the episode on 27th April may have been related to the known concern over shoulder-fired missiles sounds less far-fetched when we recall the incident earlier this year of the scheduled flight that landed in the Hudson River without loss of life. The videos show that the two engines were damaged in a manner that could not possibly have been achieved by a bird-strike – the story that was quickly peddled to cover up what actually happened – which may have been that the plane was immobilised by one or more shoulder-launched missiles. The video showed a black SUV racing along the side of the river as the plane ‘landed’ on the water. In other words, a message may have been sent by the Russian mafiya that they expect to be paid, or nastier things will start happening.

THE CURIOUS MATTER OF THE BRIEFCASE UNDER THE TABLE
Sources who attended a very recent ‘conservative’ dinner meeting in Washington, DC, at which General John Singlaub, Ross Perot and General Petraeus were prominently on display, reported to us that a certain operative spent the dinner suddenly leaving the table to ‘conduct some business’, returning, vanishing again, and then finally disappearing altogether, during the event. On arrival at the dinner, the spook had brought a briefcase which he slid under the table where he was seated.

When, finally, this agitated individual left altogether and didn’t return, it was later found that his briefcase was still where he had left it under the table. Our sources advise that it was decided to open the briefcase. It contained nothing at all, with the exception of a bottle of liquid. Research reveals that the operative concerned is a distinguished US counterterrorism official and a sniper.

‘WEAPONISED PNEUMONIC OR BUBONIC PLAGUE’
A retired US Army medical expert advises that our first-hand report from Mexico City [1st May 2009 posting] implied to her that the outbreak appeared to involve Weaponised Pneumonic Plague. The Merck Manual states that it has a 2-3-day incubation period, followed by the abrupt onset of high fever, chills, tachycardia, and often severe headache. Coughing, not prevalent initially, develops within 20 to 24 hours. Sputum is mucoid at first, rapidly shows red blood specks, and then becomes uniformly pink (blood). Most untreated patients die within 48 hours after the onset of symptoms.

The authoritative source elaborated:

‘The only way they could have done this would have been using the advance preparatory team that arrives before the POTUS. The team would never have been suspected. Mexico City is the perfect medium for this purpose, having a high concentration of people (over 20 million++), poverty, lousy sanitation and health, and the stagnant air pollution that overhangs the city. I would suspect that the advance prep team would also have been required to check out the top of all the highest and medium-sized buildings (for likely sniper positions). They would have used the tallest buildings and worked their way to street level in order to gain maximum saturation so as to obtain the highest kill ratio, given the dense smog and pollution and heavy population density. They would most probably have used the exhaust systems and would have placed aerosolised delivery systems within them – all set with timers, of course. They would have to have been present in order to release the plague. The entire presidential team would have been on antibiotics so as not to arouse anyone’.

‘Yersinia pestis (Bubonic Plague, or Black Death, which is still found in rodents in the southwestern United States): who would suspect it? It is not the ‘flu. The ‘flu that is (or was) spreading across the United States could simply be a cover. They should spread out and try to find the delivery systems. These people are murderous and very evil, and extremely stupid. They are not the sharpest tools in the shed. They have to find the delivery systems before these operatives attempt to retrieve them’.

‘Bubonic plague involves the lymph nodes and severe swelling, whereas pneumonic plague is a variant but does not involve the lymph nodes so it is usually misdiagnosed, and is very deadly’.

Marc S. Griswold, a former Secret Service agent who was serving as the lead advance special agent for the US Energy Secretary, Stephen Chu, during the trip to Mexico in mid-April, and who travelled with President Barack Obama on his visit, confirmed in early May that the minor cough he contracted in Mexico developed into Swine ‘Flu. The agent’s close family members are among nine probable cases that were reported on 1st May to have emerged in Maryland, Another was a World Bank official who had recently travelled to Mexico.

Although Griswold recovered and was reportedly back at work at the beginning of May, the agent said that his illness severely strained his relationship with his brother; while his daughter, who was not infected, had to endure stares and mean jokes as rumours spread through her school about her father’s rôle in bringing the first cases of Swine ‘Flu to the region. Close friends were refusing to talk to him, after it was realized that he had infected his nephew and other family members.

Of course the real explanation for these reactions was suspicion that Griswold may have been one of the agents involved in releasing what may have been a Weaponised Biowarfare Agent.

As previously reported, samples of agents went missing from the US Army Medical Command’s operation at Fort Detrick, MD. Specifically, on 22nd April, US Army criminal investigators were reported by The Frederick News-Post to be looking into the removal of disease samples from the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases. The investigators are from the US Army Criminal Investigation Unity at Fort Meade.

Fort Detrick (USAMRID) is the US Army’s leading biodefence laboratory, where researchers study pathogens, such as Ebola, anthrax and plague. In February, USAMRID halted all its research into these and other diseases, following discovery of virus samples that weren’t listed in its inventory.

The Institute’s Commander, Colonel John Skvorak, ordered the halting of research while experts conducted a complete inventory of the Institute’s agents, which was not yet complete in late April when this information first surfaced.

FORMER U.S. HIGH OFFICIALS CONTINUE RUNNING ‘BLACK OPS’
Evil operatives and holders of high office like Richard B. Cheney, who is certainly involved in the present situation, are known to continue operations with which they were involved while in office. They believe they are entitled to carry on seamlessly with whatever they were doing or controlling before. This is the origin of the adage that there is no such thing as a ‘former’ operative. Cheney is thought to have ‘split’ from the Bushes since leaving office,

In addition, these people are operatives first, and holders of high office second: so the reason that they carry on seamlessly with their ‘Black Ops’ is really that ‘this is what they do’.

It is clear that George Bush Sr. is/was capable of anything, including crimes against humanity: after all, he was personally responsible, for instance, for the deployment of chemical weapons against the civilian population of Halabja, Iraq, in 1992, a horrific and unrequited crime against humanity.

There is little doubt that the reason, or a key reason, why Bush Sr. and probably former President Clinton, who ‘works for’ or ‘worked for’ George H. W.Bush Sr., remained ‘untouched’ despite the immense crimes that they have committed, was that they have all along been blackmailing the US Government by letting it be known that if crossed, they would be prepared to adopt ‘exceptional measures’, not excluding crimes against humanity. If the US structures were influenced by this hideous blackmail, they failed to understand that the blackmailer is in a weaker position than the blackmailee – since once the blackmailer has used his ‘weapon’, he is powerless. Which may very well now be the case with Bush Sr., a man as evil and dangerous as Adolf Hitler (Schickelgruber).

The good news is that Bush Sr’s. dementia is proceeding rapidly. The bad news is that Mrs Barbara Bush is reported to be intermeddling in Bush Sr.’s Fraudulent Finance affairs. The further very bad news is that Jeb Bush has been wheeled in to carry on where Mr Bush Sr. may be on the verge of leaving off. A former employee at Jeb Bush’s private residence in Florida revealed some time ago that the Jeb Bush home was encased in an aura of satanic evil.

WILD REPORTS BY ANONYMOUS UNPROVENANCED SOURCES
Wild reports from unprovenanced, anonymous US sources which cannot be trusted because the sources conceal their identities and co-ordinates, can be dismissed as consisting of the usual toxic mixture of fact and falsehood. As for the suggestion by an identified source that ‘Internet reports’ may contain disinformation, we object to being bracketed with cowards who post anonymously and therefore cannot be held accountable for what they publish.

And since the object of the exercise is to extract truth from the dense fog of disinformation and lies spewed out by the controlled outlets, it is inevitable that, from time to time, information may turn out to be unreliable. Few can avoid being deceived by these ‘Black Ops’ people sometimes.

But when other sources pick up our feeds, as has happened repeatedly recently, you can be reasonably sure that what we have reported first is accurate ‘to the best of our knowledge and belief’ at the time of reporting. Finally, on this subject, we do not read the anonymous sources.

On one issue reported to us as having been featured in such sources, we do have a constructive observation to make. It is known that much top-secret US military technology has been transferred, during and since the Clinton era, to the Chinese. The motivation for this TREASON, we suggest, is that since the United States (due to the corruption of its structures and top officials) could not pay the Chinese what was owed to them, high-tech US secrets in breach of US national security were handed over IN LIEU OF PAYMENT. This may have happened on several occasions, we suspect.

OUTGOING BRITISH M.E.P. BLASTS THE SHAM EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
During the almost (typically) empty final plenary session of the European Parliament before the European ‘elections’ in June, the Editor’s friend, Ashley Mote, Independent MEP for Southeast England, attempted to sum up, in the one minute allotted for such speeches in the rubber-stamp European Soviet (sorry, ‘Parliament’), what he thinks of that deliberate travesty of democracy.

This is what he said to the European Soviet on 4th May 2009:

‘Over the last five years I have watched in horror the EU’s endless, scandalous, institutionalised looting of taxpayers’ money’.

‘I have watched in horror an already overcrowded UK being deluged by hundreds of thousands of uninvited foreign workers who arrived for their benefit and to claim our welfare’.

‘I have watched in close-up a legislative system which permits anonymous bureaucrats to generate so-called law without any regard for the damage they do to the British economy and businesses’.

‘I have watched in close-up this expensive, ineffectual talking shop of a ‘Parliament’ masquerading as an illusion of accountable democracy – a monstrous deceit on the electors who sent us here’.

‘President Gorbachëv was right (2). The EU is the old Soviet Union, dressed in Western clothes. One day you will realise that you cannot be masters in someone’ else’s house’.

As usual, the few socialists and ideological federalists waiting their turn to speak tried to shout Mr Mote down, without any intervention from the Chairman, of course.

In doing so, they indicated that, as usual, Mr Mote had struck a few nerves.

Notes:

(1) The Directors of the named institutions were collated from the criminal enterprises’ websites on 6th May 2009. In each case, the name of the main institution is indicated only.

(2) This information reflects a comment made by Gorbachëv (real name Orbach, or Korbach) on a visit to London in March 2001.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. Some versions have a ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

SHOOT-OUT AFTER TRUSTEES WERE ABUSED ALL WEEKEND

CLINTON, OBAMA TARGETED BY WORLD COURT AT END OF 100 DAYS

Wednesday 29 April 2009 14:30

UPDATE, 30TH APRIL: 1:00am UK time; 8:00pm EST:

BUSH SR. DEMANDS HIS IMMUNITY BACK, IS REFUSED, SO HE SAYS HE WILL CONTINUE
IMPEDING THE SETTLEMENTS INDEFINITELY! See foot of report above the Legal Notes
that the crooks ignore. PLUS: 40 OF BUSH SR.’S CRONIES HAVE BEEN ARRESTED…

FURTHER UPDATE, 30TH APRIL: 4:00am UK time; 11:00pm EST:

CONFIRMED: ARRESTS DID TAKE PLACE DURING THE IMF/WORLD BANK SPRING MEETINGS:
See at foot of report below the first Update indicated above: LATE NEWS JUST CONFIRMED…

GENERALLY ‘UNSATISFACTORY’ OUTCOME OF IMF/WORLD BANK MEETINGS

FOREIGN REPRESENTATIVES AND TRUSTEES CALLED TO U.S. BANKS

TWO U.S. FEDERAL AGENTS KILLED IN SHOOT-OUT ON MONDAY

ALL WORLD COURT IMMUNITIES NULL AND VOID ON WEDNESDAY

MRS CLINTON AND THE EMBEZZELLED KATRINA FUNDS

PERPETRATING ECONOMIC TERRORISM WHILE HOLDING HIGH OFFICE

VISIT TO IRAQ TO COLLECT OR ORGANISE REPATRIATION OF FUNDS

CYNICAL DISPLAY OF PUBLIC ‘TOGETHERNESS’ BY THE CLINTONS

PRESIDENT OBAMA ON NOTICE TO DELIVER: END OF 100 DAYS’ ‘GRACE’

FAILING CLOSURE, CHINA WILL BE FREE TO EXERCISE ITS LIEN

OBAMA CONFOUNDED WHEN HIS TELEPROMPTER IS SABOTAGED

CERTIFICATES FROM U.S. OPERATIVE’S CACHE WOUND UP IN THE BAHAMAS

FAMILIAR CRIMINAL BANKS ON THE HOOK IN ITALY

NEW U.S. PONZI SCHEME EXPOSED

ORCHESTRATED DISTRACTIONS IN CASE OF EXPOSURE EMERGENCY

BIOLOGICAL WARFARE OPERATION AGAINST CUBA IN 1971

Operating the $ Refunding from London without US Government participation delivers:

(1) Massive ongoing windfall tax accruals to the BRITISH Treasury given that all funds resident in the United Kingdom jurisdiction for 24 hours are taxable by the Inland Revenue. This makes the UK Refunding proposal of extreme interest to Her Majesty’s Government and the UK Treasury.

((2) Massive ongoing windfall benefits to the UNITED STATES Treasury given that it will also receive a cascade of tax accruals from this independent private sector Refunding Program.

(3) The necessary refinancing of the UK and US banking systems ON THE BOOKS with no input from either Government and NO CORRESPONDING DEBT CREATED IN THE BACKGROUND.

(4) GOOD (i.e., on-balance sheet, taxed) money which will CHASE OUT THE BAD MONEY that the crass US Fraudulent Finance concoction will generate.

In mid-March we published: International Currency Review Volume 34, #2 on Systemic Fraudulent Finance and The Legalisation of Financial Corruption. Also published recently are issues of our titles The Latin American Times, Economic Intelligence Review, London Currency Report, Interest Rate Service and Arab-Asian Affairs.

For details, see the second white panel on the Home Page.

To subscribe to our intelligence services, see the catalogue under World Reports Limited.

Globalist hegemony ideology and practice is comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor’s study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.

ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the Internet Security Solution software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

DONATIONS: You can help finance these exposures (which the Editor has to prepare on top of his normal publishing responsibilities) by sending us a donation. Press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

GENERALLY ‘UNSATISFACTORY’ OUTCOME OF IMF/WORLD BANK MEETINGS
With the IMF/World Bank Spring meetings having effectively broken up in a state of suspended disarray because everyone was working in a ‘money vacuum’ as explained in the preceding report, we immediately started to receive and obtain information about what may have been going on in parallel beyond the confines of the sealed-off area surrounding the Bretton Woods institutions in downtown Washington, DC.

To begin with, in line with our reference in the preceding report to the fact that stolen funds were required to have been ‘restored’ on Friday 24th April, with the 147 indictees placed on notice that if this did not happen they would all be taken into custody, certain Trustees or legal representatives were summoned to the various US banks on Friday to be present for their payments.

As we reported previously, as of 9:00pm EST on Saturday 25th April, we had received no reports of any arrests. This is consistent with repeated past instances of this syndrome, including of course the original surfacing of the indictments against the 147 senior figures that occurred back in 2007.

FOREIGN REPRESENTATIVES AND TRUSTEES CALLED TO U.S. BANKS
It is now confirmed that those Trustees or other recipients who were paid earlier, were all ‘bagmen’ cronies and operatives associated with the Bush Crime Nexus. The Trustees or legal agents who were called to US banks on Friday 24th April 2009 reportedly represented foreign governments and other parties that are due to be paid (and would have stood no prospect of ever being paid out if we hadn’t mounted this de facto exposure operation, although of course they don’t know this and wouldn’t care even if they did know it).

These people were told that matters would be resolved to their satisfaction on Friday 24th April (unspoken: following restoration of the stolen funds). However they received no satisfaction on that date, and neither were they paid out on Saturday or Sunday, despite having been encouraged to hang around, which (according to one report) they did. So the weekend came and went, and on Monday the lid blew off the cauldron.

TWO U.S. FEDERAL AGENTS KILLED IN SHOOT-OUT ON MONDAY
Specifically, we are informed that trouble arose between US Federal enforcement officials and an unknown number of these Trustees or representatives of foreign parties, as a result of which a shoot-out occurred and two Federal agents were shot dead.

We further understand that tensions ran so high that if there had been more ‘Feds’ present, they would all have been shot dead, as well. Our enquiries as to where this shoot-out occurred have so far drawn a blank. But when checked with knowledgeable alternative sources, the information was not denied and neither was any of what follows.

It is understood that after being messed about from Friday to Monday with the usual excuses and elaborations being proffered to explain the delays, which were entirely due, as usual, to sabotage operations and interventions by the criminal George H. W. Bush Sr.-controlled CIA/DVD apparat, the Trustees and representatives had had more than enough; and since they are the agents of foreign governments or have official bodyguards, they showed what they can do when provoked.

In other words, violence similar to the shoot-out that occurred on former Vice President Cheney’s official premises in 2007, which were hushed up, was replicated on Monday 27th April 2009. We and others expect more of the same in the near future. The Trustees were also reported to have told the US parties playing these games that they will not tolerate this criminal abuse any longer.

ALL WORLD COURT IMMUNITIES WERE TO BE NULL AND VOID FROM WEDNESDAY
Contrary to assertions by some sources that do not know the background, it is not true that the World Court is not involved. Vast sums of money owed to GOVERNMENTS have been stolen and diverted, and this crisis is at the ‘Red Alert’ stage, with the World Court now reliably reported to have ruled that ALL immunities are null and void effective Wednesday 29th April.

Cynics will say that ‘we have been here before’, too, which is true: but the crisis is now much further advanced, with for instance the US States requiring immediate settlement of what the US Federal Government has promised them under the Obama Stimulus Plan being one of the critical pressure levers at this juncture. Here, we should clarify that Pennsylvania borrowed the $480 million LAST WEEK, against the ‘pledge’ of $18 billion stimulus money which it has yet to receive. The US States are falling deeper into debt while the Federal Government dithers and fails to deliver on its promises.

Furthermore, the payment in gold via the IMF to China described in the preceding report (together with any other payments that may have been made to China that we do not have adequate details about) represented only a partial payment. The accuracy of that report has been confirmed. China’ s principal remains overdue and payable immediately. And given that the Settlements payouts were aborted, with violence, over the weekend and into Monday, the overall situation as reported to us is actually way beyond the ‘Red Alert’ stage.

MRS CLINTON AND THE EMBEZZELLED KATRINA FUNDS
Central to the crisis is Mrs Hillary Clinton, the US Secretary of State. Mrs H. Clinton and her CIA husband are reported to us to have criminally handled the proceeds from the Katrina allocation by Congress. On recent trips abroad, Mrs Clinton is further reported to us to have been required to recover the Katrina monies, which the Clintons are reported to have stashed offshore in private accounts. It is understood that Mrs Clinton may have failed to repatriate these stolen funds, and that, while Barack Obama knows all about this scandal, ignoring the Misprision of Felony Statute, the US President may have determined that he will not do anything about it.

If that were the case, Mr Obama would be confirmed as obstructing justice and an accessory to a criminal act and a co-conspirator in respect of the embezzlement of US public monies allocated by Congress for the benefit of the people of New Orleans and the region devastated by the hurricane.

PERPETRATING ECONOMIC TERRORISM WHILE HOLDING HIGH OFFICE
But that is the least of Mrs Clinton’s ‘worries’. According to our sources, the World Court requires all payments to be made by the end of President Obama’s first 100 days, namely Wednesday 29th April, implying that after his failure to resolve matters following his Inauguration – which triggered, to begin with, the final withdrawal of the sovereign $14.0 trillion on 29th January 2009, as previously reported – he may have been given 100 days to ‘fix it, or else’.

The same reliable sources elaborated that Mrs Clinton is in a vulnerable position because of her alleged direct involvement in blocking resolution of the Settlements in collaboration with the Bush-Greenspan criminal intelligence apparatus. The corollary to this, as it was put to us, was that the Secretary of State would have to be removed from office on or after Tuesday 28th April: and this assertion was not even conditional, although logic would suggest that if this were the case, her continuation in office would depend upon her ceasing forthwith to intervene by preventing the payments. Should this Jezebel continue with her obstructive activity, President Obama is under immediate pressure to remove her from power. Payments were supposed to start at 1:00pm on Tuesday 28th April, as this background report was being prepared: but nothing happened.

Given not least the Katrina embezzlement, but of course also the immense financial crimes with which the Clintons are associated, this Jezebel can be removed from office for perpetrating economic terrorism while serving as Secretary of State in the United States Government.

VISIT TO IRAQ TO COLLECT OR ORGANISE REPATRIATION OF FUNDS
Against this background, Mrs Hillary Clinton surfaced in Iraq, ostensibly to hold a ‘Town Meeting’, but in reality to conduct banking transactions. These will have concerned either the stealing or the repatriation of Bush-Clinton stolen or diverted funds stashed at the Central Bank of Iraq, which are urgently needed to enable President Obama to meet his obligations. The total information famine on Tuesday suggested that this operation, and the implications for Mrs Clinton’s future, were up in the air: but we understood on Tuesday evening that Mrs Clinton’s position was highly precarious.

It is speculated in some circles that the sudden switch by Arlen Specter to the Democrats may have something to do with the resolution of these matters, and may not be solely connected with his concern about not being re-elected if he remained with the Republicans.

CYNICAL DISPLAY OF PUBLIC ‘TOGETHERNESS’ BY THE CLINTONS
Against this ominous background, the notorious Clintons have staged a ‘togetherness fest’ for public consumption, interpreted by the ‘mainstream’ media as implying that, after some 30 years of tempestuous marriage, they are ‘enjoying a second honeymoon’. First, this CIA couple were on display at the appropriately-named Café Carlyle [sic!] where, The New York Post reported solemnly, they sat ‘holding hands’ while listening to the cabaret, in the company of their daughter Chelsea.

Next, these two crooks were seen walking hand-in-hand down MacArthur Boulevard in Washington after an intimate dinner at a popular restaurant.

As The Sunday Times, London, put it: ‘The wild rumours [sic!] about Bill’s philandering and Hillary’s stony heart have been replaced by gooey marital bliss – or at least, a convincing public display of it’.

Which is, of course, the point. First, there is the possibility that William Jefferson may believe he has got away with colossal thefts with impunity. Secondly, Mrs C. may believe ditto. But thirdly, the purpose of this hyper-cynical exercise will have been to weaken the resolve of Gold Badges who SHOULD be arresting these criminals for perpetrating economic terrorism against the people of the United States and the Rest of the World – or at the very least, to make it politically ‘harder to do what is necessary’. Oh, and there’s the ‘in-your-face’ point that these unspeakable operatives can walk around New York and Washington without encountering any ‘problems’ whatsoever.

PRESIDENT OBAMA ON NOTICE TO DELIVER: END OF 100 DAYS’ ‘GRACE’
Reliable sources elaborated that if the Settlements are not completed by the end of Obama’s First Hundred Days, the President himself, being closely implicated in the blocking of the payments, will be vulnerable to arrest for perpetrating economic terrorism under the Patriot Act legislation. When the Editor remonstrated about this, he was told that any Gold Badge, and other empowered US Law Enforcement officer, has the power to arrest officials at the very highest level for terrorist offences which presuppose failing to uphold the Rule of Law and the Constitution.

It is understood that the World Court has mandated the removal from office via their apprehension, of all those who are continuing to stand in the way of resolution, and that this requirement does NOT exclude the Secretary of State, Vice President Biden, and President Obama.

The World Court has jurisdiction here because foreign governments complain of funds due to them being stolen and diverted by present and former holders of the highest offices in the United States. The history of these matters is quite clear on this score, we are advised.

FAILING CLOSURE, CHINA WILL BE FREE TO EXERCISE ITS LIEN
Furthermore, not only will all immunities cease to apply effective on 29th April 2009, but China will also be free to exercise its lien as previously described.

It can now be seen that the IMF gold transaction referenced in the preceding report represented, as noted above, a ‘progress payment’, not overall satisfaction of the overdue Chinese claims, as perhaps was previously thought. The Chinese have yet to recover their principal.

Meanwhile the Trustees and representatives of foreign governments from all over the world who were treated with contempt and messed around from Friday 24th to Monday 27th April, ending in the violent confrontation reported above, have reportedly let it be understood YET AGAIN that the obstructive behaviour perpetrated by the White House, the Vice President’s Office, the Clintons, the Bush Crime apparatus, the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve will not be tolerated; and failing settlement we would expect the Chinese to move in to seize US assets all over the world.

OBAMA CONFOUNDED WHEN HIS TELEPROMPTER IS SABOTAGED
An interesting straw in the wind surfaced on Monday 27th April, during a speech that President Obama gave to a science group. The context here is that Rep. Harry Reid reports, in a book to be published on 5th May 2009, that after congratulating Obama on his public speaking skills, Obama responded quietly and ‘with humility’: ‘I have a gift’ (of public speaking).

However when addressing this science group, the teleprompter ‘went wrong’ and the President found himself repeating whatever he had been saying previously and wound up looking stupid. We have no doubt whatsoever that this was done deliberately – possibly as a warning that it is not at all out of the question that he may suddenly be brought down from his sky-high opinion poll perch to ground zero for alleged co-conspiracy to block money belonging inter alia to foreign governments.

Whether this happens would depend upon whether he finally stands up to the criminals by whom he is surrounded and who call his tune, which we may (or may not) know shortly. Since this report is appearing almost in ‘real-time’, it is clearly subject to the ‘water under the bridge’ factor, since if matters ARE resolved, none of the above may occur (although the idea that colossal crimes can be expunged by restoring what has been stolen is both repugnant and corrosive of the Rule of Law).

These considerations omit political factors, such as the popularity of the President, and the obvious hazards that would arise if he had to be removed from office. But in a situation that has deteriorated to the extremes now observable, the normal rules cease to apply. It was quite clear to this Editor, from discussions he had in Washington with very senior journalists, that they lacked any grasp of the criminalism dimension of this crisis, and that it had never occurred to them that this is a crisis of criminal finance, first and foremost: which means that this is the proper way to look at all related developments, unlike academics (including those present at a symposium attended by the Editor at the Spring Meetings) who appear to regard discussion of criminal behaviour in this crisis as though this is some category of pornography. In their refined academic, university environment, criminal intelligence operations are unknown, unknowable and typically pooh-poohed as fanciful.

In other words, they are duped by the aura of respectability that surrounds banking. In reality, it can be compared to the Pharisees, whom the Lord described as ‘whited sepulchres’: spick and span on the outside, but vile, filthy and havens for all corruption within.

FACT: On 14th April, President Obama delivered a speech at Georgetown University, you may recall. What you may not recall is that Mr Obama was annoyed to find that s symbol of Jesus Christ was visible in the backdrop. Whereupon aides complied by covering the symbol with a piece of plywood, painted, guess what? BLACK. It has not been explained to us what the ‘symbol’ was: one would assume a cross (not a graven image because ironically Obama would have been perfectly correct in ordering such an image to be obscured: ‘Thous shalt MAKE no graven image’). But that is not the point, which is that Jesus Christ is absolute anathema to these people. They cannot STAND to be reminded of Him. Which tells those who have not yet squashed their brains flat, WHO we are confronting, and why NOTHING ADEQUATE IS YET BEING DONE TO CURB THIS CRIMINALITY.

CERTIFICATES FROM U.S. OPERATIVE’S CACHE WOUND UP IN THE BAHAMAS
It may be recalled that a subsequently incarcerated operative acting as courier of diplomatic bags from Moscow to Toronto in 2000, instead of being met at Toronto Airport by Canadian intelligence officers, was met instead (according to the operative’s own testimony) by one or more Russians.

Ostensibly having anticipated such a development, the operative carried three dummy diplomatic bags (maybe this is standard procedure), which he handed over instead of the real diplomatic bags. The operative subsequently opened one of the diplomatic bags, again according to his testimony. Opening a diplomatic bag is treason, and the US Secretary of State of the day accordingly issued a warrant for the operative to be apprehended.

We now understand that certain certificates that may have been contained in these diplomatic bags found their way to The Bahamas. Apparently what has been known to happen in this context is that when the certificates (a generic word used here to denote financial instruments having monetary value) are presented to a bank, the holder of the instrument may be asked to leave the document with the bank and to return in 48 hours after the bank has checked document’s authenticity.

On returning to the bank as requested, the ‘holder’ is told that, no, the instruments are counterfeit and have therefore been confiscated in accordance with the bank’s responsibilities. However in practice, the bank has gained a real asset which can then be applied by the bank for leverage and hypothecation purposes. It is understood that this may have occurred in respect of the instruments removed from the diplomatic bag. The operative was incarcerated for a very long time in solitary confinement and ‘his case is sealed’, according to a Pentagon-linked agent familiar with the case.

This may be pertinent, given the recent murder in The Bahamas mentioned the preceding report:

23rd April: Hywel Jones, 55, a former Natwest banker, former prominent Director of the Bankers’ Association of the Bahamas and of the Bahamas Institute of Bankers, is shot in the back of the head by a sole gunman waiting in ambush outside the office of his offshore financial services company in Nassau, capital of the Bahamas. The ‘slim, dark male’ gunman escaped on a motorcycle.

On 25th April, Mr Jones, from Wales, was reported to be critically ill in a coma and was under police guard after having undergone emergency surgery.

It is believed that the bullet passed through his head. Mr Jones was arriving for work when he was shot. This is now thought to be a Stanford-connected liquidation. Recall that Stanford’s lone British accountant on Antigua, whose accounting contract with Stanford ended on 31st December 2008, died suddenly and mysteriously on New Year’s Day. There is speculation that Stanford International controlled some of the Japanese (Yamashita) gold.

There are no coincidences when imploding cascades of crimes unravel like this…

FAMILIAR CRIMINAL BANKS ON THE HOOK IN ITALY
As you will recall, we have had to refer to certain banks by name as criminal enterprises, because this is an accurate description thereof. Although no further proof of their criminality is needed, it is pouring in from every quarter. The latest development concerns municipal bond investigations that are proliferating on both sides of the Atlantic as the Fraudulent Finance Octopus is progressively overpowered, or some of its legs are cut off.

On 28th April, The New York Times reported that the Italian authorities have seized about $300 million in assets held by JPMorganChase, Deutsche Bank, UBS and Depfa, part of Hypo Real Estate, Munich, officials from which have been accused of fraud. Specifically, the Italian Financial Police (Guardia di Finanzia) in Milan took over real estate properties, bank accounts and shares on 27th April to be sure it could collect from the banks – which are no more trusted, therefore, in Italy, than anywhere else nowadays – if their officials were found guilty and the banks are going to be held responsible. The banks are suspected by the Milan prosecutor, Alfredo Robledo, of making $130 million in illicit profits in connection with their handling of municipal bonds.

Three of these banks are also being investigated over their municipal bond practices in the United States. Officials or former officials of JPMorganChase, Deutsche Bank and UBS, as well as the institutions themselves, are the subject of investigations, according to their corporate filings and documents filed in a number of civil cases. JPMorganChase’s Annual Report, published in March 2009, acknowledged parallel investigations by the US Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission into possible antitrust and securities violations involving derivatives sold to local governments. This behaviour would be consistent with the complete breakdown of trust.

In Milan, the prosecutor accused the bankers of misleading the city and falsely claiming that a $2.2 billion municipal bond issue and related swap contracts that the city undertook to retire other debt in June 2005, would generate savings. The prosecutor said that if all the costs had been included in the presentation, the entire transaction would have been illegal under the national legislation that permits debt to be restructured only if it yields savings.

NEW U.S. PONZI SCHEME EXPOSED.
On 27th April, four people were indicted in a $70 million Ponzi scheme under which more than 1,000 homeowners were promised that their mortgages would be paid off within seven years. The fraud, which entrapped victims from Maryland to California, financed a glitzy lifestyle for the defendants, Andrew Hamilton Williams Jr., 58 (Hollywood FL), Michael Anthony Hickson, 46 (Commack, NY), Isaac Jerome Smith , 46 (Spotsylvania, VA) and Alvita Karen Gunn, 31 (Hanover, MD).

This is a ‘minor Ponzi scheme’ by the standards exposed earlier, but the FBI is reported to be investigating a large portfolio of mortgage frauds as this dimension of the Fraudulent Finance epidemic continues to unravel. Basically, all these real estate fraud operations were ultimately aimed at securing control of the physical property, which could then be passed on for profit to financial engineers looking for property assets for financial trading purposes.

The ten large Ponzi schemes in Europe are still expected to ‘blow’.

ORCHESTRATED DISTRACTIONS IN CASE OF EXPOSURE EMERGENCY
Against the background outlined above, several noticeable distractions have been orchestrated, suggesting a degree of panic within the intelligence community and the Executive Branch, as the storm that is engulfing them threatened to break the Red Alert-o-Meter.

These distractions are easily identified:

The wall-to-wall controversy surrounding President Barack Obama’s release of information about barbaric torture abuses perpetrated under the Bush-Cheney Nazi régime, accompanied by Obama’s parallel decision that no-one involved in these abominations is to be prosecuted.

Not only did this set off a firestorm in the broadcast media which conveniently raged distractingly throughout the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings period, but it also triggered virulent protests from some of Obama’s strongest genuine supporters, including a number of influential people – who let it be known that their support for the President would lapse if he thought he could get away with not prosecuting the corrupt and barbaric CIA and other (including contracted specialist ‘private sector’) torture operatives responsible for these hideous Nazi-style crimes.

The appearance of the duplicate Air Force One plane very low over Manhattan, reminiscent of 9/11, on the morning of Monday 27th April – which JUST HAPPENED to coincide with the shoot-out referenced above. Given this ‘coincidence’, our interim assessment is that this operation was staged as a distraction just in case news of the shootings of the two Federal agents were to be leaked to the broadcast media. At all events, the official ‘explanation’ for this fiasco was beyond ridiculous – namely, that the aircraft was to fly past the Statue of Liberty so that Government photographers could take photographs of it for publicity purposes.

Such a montage could be concocted by any reasonably proficient user of Photoshop: and that includes the Editor of this service. This exercise lends new meaning to the phrase ‘scraping the bottom of the barrel’ when it comes to inventing official lies to cover up monumental intelligence community botch-ups. It also shows how shallow and empty are the brains devising such scares.

The Pig ’Flu dimension: The combination of different strains of influenza, taken from pigs, birds and including two types of human ‘flu, can only be achieved in laboratory conditions. The culprit is reported to us to be Fort Detrick, Maryland (Army Medical Command) and dissemination of the virus is reported to have been implemented by US agents during the recent presidential visit to Mexico.

Furthermore we have been told of the existence of a pig farm located in Mexico that is run by a US corporation out of Virginia (viz., US intelligence community-land). It would appear that this release represents a deliberate US counterintelligence diversion and obfuscation exercise. Considered in the context of ‘Executive Order 13295: Making individual US citizens subject to unrestricted arrest and detention in the event of a pandemic’, this is a decidedly sinister development, although it may represent yet another extremely cynical ‘scareism’ tactic. At all events, this ‘flu issue is ‘perfectly formed’ to provide a diversionary background intended to obfuscate the wholesale stealing and diversion of funds over which this Presidency has been presiding, just like its predecessors.

According to the World Health Organisation, this particular strain has never been observed in pigs or human beings before, while a Reuters report has confirmed that the strain is indeed a genetic mix of swine, avian and human ‘flu. An Associated Press report cites at least one financial analyst as estimating that up to $388 million worth of sales of Tamilfu may be pending in the near future, even without an epidemic. Tamiflu may deliver quite unpleasant side effects including nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, headache, dizziness, fatigue, coughing – in fact the very symptoms that the concoction is supposed to counter. Japan prohibited this drug in 2007 following links to suicidal behaviour.

The real danger, then, is that, for nefarious reasons including, most pressingly, in order to provide a comprehensive diversion from the cascading exposures of decades of US financial criminality, as well as being beholden to giant pharmaceutical firms, this vaccine may soon be mandated by the US authorities and possibly by other Governments interested in the satanic objectives of population control and reduction, or, more likely, playing around with ‘Black experiments’ in this connection.

BIOLOGICAL WARFARE OPERATION AGAINST CUBA IN 1971
The swine ’flu pandemic scare operation is also sinister given that the depraved ‘Black’ US intelligence community has tried to deploy ‘swine ‘flu’ as a biological weapon in the past, as is suggested by the following article from the front page of The San Francisco Chronicle dated 10th January 1977, which is reproduced here verbatim, without amendment, in conclusion:

San Francisco Chronicle citing Newsday
January 10, 1977 Front page

1971 Mystery

CIA Link to Cuban
Pig Virus Reported

With at least the tacit backing of Central Intelligence Agency officials, operatives linked to anti-Castro terrorists introduced African swine fever virus into Cuba in 1971. Six weeks later an outbreak of the disease forced the slaughter of 500,000 pigs to prevent an animal epidemic.

A US intelligence source told Newsday last week he was given the virus in a sealed, unmarked container at a U.S. Army base and CIA training ground in the Panama Canal Zone, with instructions to turn it over to the anti-Castro group.

The 1971 outbreak, the first and only time the disease has hit the Western Hemisphere, was labeled the ‘most alarming event’ of 1971 by the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization. African swine fever is a highly contagious and usually lethal viral disease that infects only pigs and, unlike swine flu, cannot be transmitted to humans. All local production of pork, a Cuban staple, was halted, apparently for several months.

A CIA spokesman, Dennis Berend, in response to a Newsday request for comment, said: ‘We don’t comment on information from unnamed and, at best, obscure sources’. Why the virus turned up in Cuba has been a mystery to animal investigators ever since the outbreak. Informed speculation assumed that the virus entered Cuba either in garbage from a commercial airliner or in sausages brought in by merchant seamen.

However, on the basis of numerous interviews over four months with U.S. intelligence sources, Cuban exiles and scientists concerning the outbreak (which occurred two years after the then-President Nixon had banned the use of offensive chemical and biological warfare), Newsday
was able to piece together this account of events leading up to the outbreak.

The US intelligence source said that early in 1971 he was given the virus in a sealed, unmarked container at Ft. Gulick, an Army base in the Panama Canal Zone. The CIA also operates a paramilitary training center for career personnel and mercenaries at Ft. Gulick.

The source said he was given instructions to turn the container with the virus over to members of an anti-Castro group.

The container then was given to a person in the Canal Zone, who took it by boat and turned it over to persons aboard a fishing trawler off the Panamanian coast. The source said the substance was not identified to him until months after the outbreak in Cuba. He would not elaborate further.

Another man involved in the operation, a Cuban exile who asked not to be identified, said he was on the trawler when the virus was put aboard at a rendezvous point off Bocas del Toro, Panama.

He said the trawler carried the virus to Navassa Island, a tiny, deserted, US.-owned island between Jamaica and Haiti. From there, after the trawler made a brief stopover, the container was taken to Cuba and given to other operatives on the southern coast near the US Navy base at Guantanamo Bay in late March, according to the source on the trawler.

The source on the trawler, who had been trained by the CIA and had carried out previous missions for the agency, said he saw no CIA officials aboard the boat that delivered the virus to the trawler off Panama, but added:

‘We were well paid for this and Cuban exile groups don’t have that kind of money . . .’.

He said he was revealing the information because he is a member of an exile group that is being investigated by the United States in connection with terrorist activity in Florida. His account was confirmed by another intelligence source in Miami. The source indicated he had no proof that the operation was approved by CIA officials, but added: ‘In a case like this, though, they would always give them (CIA officials in the Washington area) plausible deniability’.

The investigation referred to by the operative on the trawler involves a Federal inquiry into terrorist acts allegedly carried out by Cuban exiles. Those include bombings and assassination attempts in the United States and Venezuela. Trained originally by the CIA for operations against Cuba [sic], the exiles have become more restive as they view what they believe to be an increasing move toward rapprochement between Fidel Castro and the United States [sic!].

UPDATE, 30TH APRIL: 1:00 am UK time: 8:00pm EST:

BUSH SR. DEMANDS HIS IMMUNITY BACK AND IS REFUSED
The latest intelligence associated with the background reported here is that, confronted with the realisation that his World Court immunity has been cancelled with effect from today (see report), George H. W. Bush Sr., the criminal thug who sustains his power by blackmail and bribery, with the criminal assistance of Dr Alan Greenspan, demanded the restoration of his immunity.

We are informed that this request was refused. In response, George H. W. Bush Sr., stated with an unprecedented degree of arrogance, that he will personally see to it that the releases are blocked indefinitely until such time as his immunity is restored.

Naturally, this threat is meaningless, since all concerned know that if his World Court immunity from prosecution were to be restored, Bush would continue to ensure, by whatever means he deploys, that the Settlement payouts are blocked ad infinitum, in collaboration with his entrapped criminal co-conspirators. He must now be prosecuted. He is already under indictment. He must be arrested, incarcerated and dealt with like the common criminal he is. AND THIS MUST HAPPEN NOW!

40 OF BUSH SR’S CRONIES (AGENTS) ROUNDED UP ON 29TH APRIL
The reaction of responsible (US and foreign?) Law Enforcement on Wednesday was to round up at least FORTY of Bush Sr.’s agents, whom we believe may be very senior people. The total number of bankers, officials, agents and others at the receiving end of indictments is 147, as reported, so it is likely that there may be another 107 to go.

Wednesday 29th April was the day when the releases had to be concluded, with immunities ceasing to apply and all standing in the way liable to be removed. So far, the outcome has been no releases, defiance from Bush 41, and 40 of Bush’s agents or collaborating banker operatives arrested.

WHAT IS THE PROBLEM? IS THIS DEVIL GOD?
Normal people ask themselves: what on earth is the problem with arresting the head of the snake? Don’t ask US: ask Law Enforcement. Is it because this criminal was President? Is it JUST blackmail? Is it JUST bribery? Is there some other reason, such as that Bush Sr. is in fact blackmailing foreign powers or the United States Government itself? Is there some secret power that he controls which enables him to continue defying the whole world? LIKE GETTING HIS FELLOW CROOKS IN THE CIA TO UNLEASH BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS, FOR INSTANCE, IF HE ISN’T LEFT ALONE?

No doubt, with tensions as high as they are now, we may soon find out.

In the meantime, all concerned need to understand that the world is being held to ransom by a SMALL BUNCH OF CRIMINALS, the most ruthless operatives alive today, who should not be alive: and that all talk of a systemic breakdown of the financial system, and all the waffle at the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings, are IRRELEVANT in this context.

THE TOP CROOKS HAVE TO BE DEALT WITH
In order for stability and prospects for eventual recovery to be restored, THE TOP CROOKS HAVE TO BE DEALT WITH. It is not for us to specify HOW this should be done, but one thing is certain: the United States is finished as a Great Power, and even as a nation, if this imperative is shirked any longer. The United States is showing itself to be a cowardly bully: willing to brutalise others, but UNABLE TO ESTABLISH ORDER IN ITS OWN BACK YARD.

While President of the United States, Bush Sr. was in the habit of telephoning contacts every two hours or so, enquiring about his investments and his filthy money – when his job was to serve the people of the United States as President! WHAT A SLUG!

This ogre supplied Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction (chemicals) and inserted his own American operative who actually unleashed the chemical weapons that Bush had provided, for money, on the people of Halabja in 1982. Everything that Bush Sr. does is for money. His golden calf is bigger than the Himalayas. Tolerating his continued interference is OUT OF THE QUESTION.

As a British intelligence source remarked to the Editor recently:

‘Bush Sr. is more evil than Hitler. At least Hitler had a sense of humour’.

THE HEAD OF THE SNAKE HAS TO BE TRAMPLED ON. IS THIS LANGUAGE CLEAR ENOUGH?

FURTHER UPDATE, 30TH APRIL: 4:00am UK time; 11:00pm EST:

CONFIRMED: ARRESTS DID TAKE PLACE DURING THE IMF/WORLD BANK SPRING MEETINGS:
It has now been confirmed that bankers and possibly officials attending the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings WERE ARRESTED AND FLOWN TO BELGIUM. This development, outline details of which have only just become available, was in line with the expectations indicated in our report from the Press Room dated 26th April. The bankers who were arrested were reportedly ‘working for’ and associated with the George H.W. Bush Sr. financial corruption ring, which is ‘protected’ by Bush’s bribed agent, Chancellor Angela Merkel (whose political life expectancy is being truncated).

In other words, the scenario described in our report from the Press Room was accurate, and some of the necessary measures anticipated WERE taken. On past form, these people can expect to be sentenced, on conviction, to a minimum of 25 years’ incarceration.

This information helps to explain the odd reaction of the Canadian Minister of Finance to the Editor’s question and remarks at the Canadian Press Conference. The Minister seemed rather nervous, responding that he had half expected such a question (see report). It also helps to confirm the Editor’s distinct impression that all was far from well behind the scenes, and that the fissures observed in respect of the ‘front issues’, meaning the issues allowed to be ventilated at press conferences and seminars for public consumption, masked deep chasms behind the closed doors from which the media is barred. Or, put more bluntly, a blazing row was raging behind the scenes over the intransigence, stupidity, arrogance, cowardice and gross incompetence of the US authorities, not least over their abject failure to arrest and incarcerate the Bushes, the Clintons, Dr Alan Greenspan (again), and other agent reptiles who are holding the whole world to ransom.

The issue of whether Bush Sr. holds some deadly blackmail weapon in his hand that he is able and ruthless enough to deploy may be the key unanswered question. No other possible explanation fits the situation. Bush Sr. thinks he can do as he likes, and no-one will lift a finger. WHY IS THIS?

The question is also bizarre, because Bush Sr. is a rigid, muddled, ageing jackass, a buffoon who probably left office with files on everyone likely to stand in his way, and a bully who issues orders to the family ‘gopher’, James A. Baker III, a very dangerous and ruthless Texan attorney who, like his mentor, is probably capable of anything beneath his thin veneer of respectability. Visiting Tbilisi in 1992 after the odious Eduard Shevardnadze had usurped, with US covert assistance, power from the legitimate President Zviad Gamsakhurdia, Baker delivered a speech about the (Georgian) myth of the Golden Fleece from a platform at a special event organised in May 1992 to provide Stalin II, as Shevardnadze was called in Georgia, with false legitimacy.

Half-way through his speech, the deafening sound of machine-gun fire intervened, as people were mown down in the adjacent Tbilisi streets by the military. Mr Baker simply stopped speaking for 20 minutes while this latest Shevardnadze atrocity was taking place. When the shooting had stopped, Baker, who was then US Secretary of State, resumed his speech as though nothing had happened. Shevardnadze, who had given the orders to mow down protesters, was sitting beside him.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. Some versions have a ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

IMF, WHITE HOUSE IN TRIANGULAR SETTLEMENT ‘SOLUTION’

SMOKE AND MIRRORS OBFUSCATION TO HIDE SOURCE OF FUNDS

Sunday 26 April 2009 03:00

• THIS REPORT WAS UPDATED 26TH AND 27TH APRIL. IMPORTANT POSTSCRIPT AT FOOT:
Updates are flagged in the ‘bullet point’ headings immediately below. A new report is pending…

• CALENDAR OF PERTINENT EVENTS FROM 8TH APRIL

• WHAT LIES BEHIND STRAUSS-KAHN’S CONFIDENCE IN RECOVERY?

• GOLD, CHINA, RUSSIA & BRAZIL’S $1.0 TRILLION TAKEN FROM DISGORGED BUSH LOOT

• RECONSTRUCTION OF WHAT APPEARS TO HAVE TAKEN PLACE

• UPDATE, SUNDAY 26TH APRIL: 5:00pm EST: TRIANGLE ALREADY COMING UNSTUCK?

• UPDATE, MONDAY 27TH APRIL: 9:30am EST: ANOTHER MURDER (IN THE BAHAMAS)
See under 23rd April in the ‘diary’ section of this report: Stanford-related liquidation.

• WHERE THE $1.0 TRILLION IS FEATURED IN THE G-7 COMMUNIQUE

• IMF ARRANGEMENT THOUGHT TO REPLACE THE LOMBARD ODIER SCHEME

• WITH CHINA OUT THE WAY AND THE WHITE HOUSE’S DEMANDS ‘SATISFIED’, WHAT NEXT?

• SENSE THAT ‘SOLUTIONS’ ARE DRIVEN BY LUST TO REVITALISE TRADING

• NEXT STEP: THE SETTLEMENTS, OR SOME OF THEM…

• THE LATEST OFFICIAL DERIVATIVES NUMBERS

• QUANTIFIED EUROPEAN BANK LOSSES

• UK TREASURY TAKING COSTLY LESSONS FROM BANKERS REPONSIBLE FOR THE CHAOS

• UPDATE: 27TH APRIL: 9:00pm EST: IMPORTANT CLOSING POSTSCRIPT. NEW REPORT PENDING… See at foot of this report above the standard Legal Notes that the crooks disregard.

• Operating the $ Refunding from London without US Government participation delivers:

(1) Massive ongoing windfall tax accruals to the BRITISH Treasury given that all funds resident in the United Kingdom jurisdiction for 24 hours are taxable by the Inland Revenue. This makes the UK Refunding proposal of extreme interest to Her Majesty’s Government and the UK Treasury.

((2) Massive ongoing windfall benefits to the UNITED STATES Treasury given that it will also receive a cascade of tax accruals from this independent private sector Refunding Program.

(3) The necessary refinancing of the UK and US banking systems ON THE BOOKS with no input from either Government and NO CORRESPONDING DEBT CREATED IN THE BACKGROUND.

(4) GOOD (i.e., on-balance sheet, taxed) money which will CHASE OUT THE BAD MONEY that the crass US Fraudulent Finance concoction will generate.

• In mid-March we published: International Currency Review Volume 34, #2 on Systemic Fraudulent Finance and The Legalisation of Financial Corruption. Also published recently are issues of our titles The Latin American Times, Economic Intelligence Review, London Currency Report, Interest Rate Service and Arab-Asian Affairs.

• For details, see the second white panel on the Home Page.

• To subscribe to our intelligence services, see the catalogue under World Reports Limited.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice is comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor’s study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the Internet Security Solution software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

• DONATIONS: You can help finance these exposures (which the Editor has to prepare on top of his normal publishing responsibilities) by sending us a donation. Press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

NEW REPORT FROM THE IMF/WORLD BANK SPRING MEETINGS STARTS HERE:

Washington, DC:

CALENDAR OF PERTINENT EVENTS FROM 8TH APRIL
In order to understand what we believe to have occurred with respect to ‘the Settlements’ as viewed from the Press Room here at the Spring Meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, we will first summarise what sources reported to us from 8th April onwards.

Bear in mind that given the secretive nature of financial and banking transactions, and of the behind-the-scenes operations of international institutions, plus the constraints arising from the priorities of national and international law enforcement and limitations placed upon access by investigative journalists to uncomfortable information, we caution that what follows represents what has been reported to us in the course of our normal enquiries, and that it represents the truth ‘to the best of our knowledge and belief’.

• 8th April 2009: Michael Wise, the former Chairman of Silverado Savings and Loan, was reported by The Denver Post [on 14th April: note the huge time delay] to have jumped from the 9th Floor of a parking garage at Tampa International Airport. This information was reported by Henry Poage, of the Hillsborough Medical Examiner’s Office. According to this source, Mr Wise drove a rental car to the ninth floor of the short-term parking garage.

The Medical Examiner’s Office ‘ruled that the death was a suicide’, explaining that a security video shows Wise pacing, before stepping off the side and landing in a landscaped area with palm trees and some greenery, according to Tampa International Airport spokeswoman Brenda Geoghagan. Wise was taken to hospital but died in the emergency room at 1:39pm. So we are to believe that a report which did not surface for a week after the event is accurate in all respects, even though if one were to be determined to commit suicide, hiring a car beforehand might be considered very odd, while surviving a nine-storey fall even into some greenery is highly improbable.

This ‘suicide’ must be considered in the context of the spate of Clintonesque murders that have been taking place, as the crooks try to ‘clean up the playground’ so that the massive unravelling of their financial criminality that is now in full swing will encounter as many ‘dead ends’ as possible. There are ‘connections’ with the death of Mr Wise that are believed to be spectacular.

• 15th April, 10:22 pm UK time: Notwithstanding that he is under indictment, George H. W. Bush Sr. was STILL attempting to move funds irregularly on this date, in response to which Euroclear was shut down so that anticipated or identified irregular financial movements would not take place. We speculated internally that this development might also be connected with a Chinese lien on funds.

• 17th April, 10:15pm UK time: It was reported to us that the Bush Crime Family had summoned a ‘top-level’ meeting in Texas, to which key co-conspirators with Bush Sr. and Dr Alan Greenspan, his chief trader, were invited. A significant number of Bush Sr.’s leading foreign co-conspiratorial assets who flew to Dallas or Houston for the meeting were reportedly apprehended at the airport. This meeting was believed to have been summoned because of the need to repatriate funds.

This is consistent with earlier reports of key parties falling below the radar. For instance, a Dallas-based broker-Trustee who had been in DIRECT and continuing touch with the Editor of this service for at least two and a half years, sending emails describing ‘imminent payment scenarios’ which were always disappointed, has not been heard from since 11th April 2009. On that date, he had commented very sensibly on the situation that seemed about to arise if the IMF had been minded to impede, on the instructions of the White House, the Editor’s press accreditation for the Spring Meetings. (This was the serious situation referenced in our reports dated 13th/14th April).

On 14th April 2009, the Editor sent emails to this contact, which bounced. Altogether, we sent nine emails spaced over a period of days, and they have all bounced. The return emails contain an NSA code which is intended to indicate that the contact was now prohibited from communicating with us. In other words, the ‘loop’ of information using us as the fulcrum had outlived its usefulness, and was closed down, implying some change or other in the overall situation.

This episode will be incorporated in a detailed but separate study on the innumerable deception techniques and operations to which the Editor has been subjected throughout these extensive investigations. More broadly, the closing down of this information ‘loop’, reaching straight back to Bush Sr., we have solid reason to believe, could be interpreted as a positive sign of progress.

Such techniques are used in intelligence to gauge how a particular deception is performing, and whether it should be continue or be modified. It was clearly felt that communicating with the Editor would facilitate the feedback that these people thought they needed, to see how far they could push their thievery. But following the G-20 meeting in the London area, the situation changed.

We should clarify here the earlier information about Greenspan’s latest arrest. It was specifically reported, and confirmed, that this crook had been arrested and was incarcerated for a 30-day period pending a hearing before a Magistrate Judge. It is possible that when our sources speak of ‘arrests’ at this level, what may actually be meant here is ‘apprehended’.

The fact that Greenspan reportedly delivered one or more speeches which overlapped the period of alleged incarceration is not material, as he has a speech-writing team and could have submitted papers before these events. However much one may dig around looking for further and better particulars, though, a veil is usually drawn over these arrests of such prominent operatives.

Neverethless, Dr Greenspoon, like Bush Sr., is reported to us to be under indictment. That’s what matters in view of what follows. In addition, following the G-20 jamboree, we received at least half a dozen reports of further extensive arrests, both in Europe and in North America.

• 21st April, 9.35pm UK time: It is reported that (a) ‘a lot more arrests’ have taken place during the day and possibly earlier, and that (b) George H. W. Bush Sr. and Greenspan intervened OPENLY to block settlement moves, apparently in the most brazen manner. The explanation given to us was that with Vice-President Biden in charge of the National Security Council, which tells the President of the United States what to do [see the preceding report], and Biden working with the Clintons who are close long-term collaborators (and simultaneously enemies) of the Bush Crime Nexus, Bush Sr. may assume that he remains inviolable, EVEN THOUGH HE IS UNDER INDICTMENT.

21st April: For the first time, the Editor learns that the International Monetary Fund has acquired a large volume of gold for smelting. (When the Fund acquires gold, it is smelted immediately). These reports, from impeccable sources, could not specify the SOURCE of the gold acquired by the Fund.

At the Spring Meetings, the Editor has attempted to ascertain the answer to this question, so far without success. Obviously, parallels with the stealing of The Queen’s gold on 29th-30th March 2007 suggested themselves, but after consideration we did not suspect there had been any such repetition: those involved got a nasty shock when that theft was publicised by this service, and the gold had to be restored. So the issue remained, for the time being, up in the air. Nevertheless, the Editor formulated the following question, which he had intended to attempt to ask the Managing Director of the IMF (but unfortunately, again, at a Press Conference on Saturday, the IMF convenor appeared deliberately NOT to call the Editor of this service). The question would have been:

‘What is the source of the gold reportedly acquired and being smelted by the IMF, and are IMF tax-exempt accounts being used to hide diverted or stolen funds, or have they been used for these purposes in the past?’.

• 22nd April 2009: The Editor learns that David Kellermann, aged 41, the Chief Financial Officer of Freddie Mac, was found dead by his wife this morning. The news surfaced on the US broadcast media at about 9:30 am EST: so at least, compared with the Wise ‘suiciding’ that occurred on 8th April but was not reported by The Denver Post until 14th April, no attempt was made to hold back this sinister news. But everything else that surfaced (and has not yet been publicised in the so-called ‘mainstream’ media), is distinctly sinister. Thus:

• Mr Kellerman asked for protection (i.e. he’d been threatened) but received only very light cover.

• Mr Kellerman was sent home for two weeks. (Reason: they couldn’t ‘get at him’ while he was out and about so they needed him to be in a fixed location, our informants advised us at the time).

• Mr Kellerman shot himself and after he had shot himself he hanged himself [sic]. This is a feat which not even Houdini in all his glory could ever have achieved.

First, Kellerman was reported to have been found hanged. However special information received from reliable sources by this service indicates that the was SHOT FIRST, AND THEN HANGED.

Mrs Kellerman informed local media that her husband had committed suicide.

• As you can imagine, there is far more behind this hideous event than has surfaced. Indeed, the imperative to prevent Mr Kellerman testifying to what has been going on, which can conveniently be summarised as THE WHOLESALE STEALING OF ASSETS FOR COLLATERALISATION AND TRADING PURPOSES, would appear to have been so intense that he ‘had to be liquidated’.

In March 2009, Freddie Mac disclosed that it was being investigated by the US Attorney’s Office in Virginia, and had been supoenaed for documents related to accounting disclosure and corporate governance issues back to September 2008, which was precisely when, as previously advised, the $14.0 trillion of assets belonging to sovereign parties was placed into ‘lockdown’ (between 10th and 12th September), followed by the ‘triple gunshot threat’ left on the Editor’s voicemail and the warning that the Editor should be careful on his forthcoming visit to Washington for the IMF/World Bank Annual Meetings in October 2008. Special protection was provided throughout that visit.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is also conducting an investigation into Freddie Mac, and has interviewed staff. A spokesman for Freddie Mac stated on 22nd April 2009 that the institution ‘knows of no connection between this personal tragedy and the ongoing regulatory enquiries’: which seems quite extraordinary, since what has so far been revealed is just the tip of the most immense iceberg in the Northern Hemisphere, we understand.

As indicated in the Update of 22nd April appended to our report dated 14th April, we are now in the Third Clinton Administration, with no checks and balances evident. The Clinton operatives have reverted to their usual form: liquidations. So far during the Spring Meetings, the Editor has heard no mention of the two ‘suicides’ referenced above, even though anyone who has not completely squashed their brains by sitting on them too hard must sense that these ‘Black’ developments are directly and specifically related to the headlong unravelling of the criminal finance Octopus.

• Note: Although the Clintons’ ill-gotten gains are believed to have been frozen (explaining why Bill is hardly rushing to the financial assistance of his CIA wife who has recently been described by another source as being more senior within the CIA than William Jefferson), they appear to have been attempting to use blackmail, the trade-off being ‘release our funds and we’ll cooperate’.

• 23rd April: We are informed that 147 key figures involved in the thefts and corruption have again been advised that they face indictment, and that NONE can rely on any prospect of immunity. This is the same number of indictments, or potential indictments, that were mooted back in 2007, but that went nowhere because of the usual high-level interference with law enforcement. However on this occasion, the information was accompanied by the following further elaboration:

• The 147 co-conspirators (including a large number of very well-known names) were told that if diverted funds were not ‘restored’ by close of business EST on Friday 24th April 2009, they would be arrested. We were separately advised that:

• Relevant law enforcement personnel (US Marshals) were IN PLACE ALL OVER WASHINGTON effective from 6.00pm on Friday 24th April, to effect the arrests. A large number of arrests was thought to be imminent, presumably if the stolen funds had not been ‘restored’.

• 23rd April: Hywel Jones, 55, a former Natwest banker, former prominent Director of the Bankers’ Association of the Bahamas and of the Bahamas Institute of Bankers, is shot in the back of the head by a sole gunman waiting in ambush outside the office of his offshore financial services company in Nassau, capital of the Bahamas. The ‘slim, dark male’ gunman escaped on a motorcycle.

On 25th April, Mr Jones, from Wales, was reported to be critically ill in a coma and was under police guard after having undergone emergency surgery.

It is believed that the bullet passed through his head. Mr Jones was arriving for work when he was shot. This is now thought to be a Stanford-connected liquidation. Recall that Stanford’s lone British accountant on Antigua, whose accounting contract with Stanford ended on 31st December 2008, died suddenly and mysteriously on New Year’s Day. There is speculation that Stanford International controlled some of the Japanese (Yamashita) gold.

There are no coincidences when imploding cascades of crimes unravel like this…

• 24th April: In the context of the US banks’ so-called ‘stress tests’, it has transpired that these institutions are now formally considered to be 100% liable for their off-balance sheet ‘assets’.

This ‘clarification’ has inevitably emerged because of the convoluted Geithner scheme whereby what are now suddenly being called ‘legacy assets’ are supposedly to be revalidated, following the devastating ‘shock’ delivered to the derivatives environment when interbank market liquidity, with the exception of drug money, dried up following the events of 10th-12th September 2008.

The problem that the designers of Geithner’s original scheme may not have factored in to their thinking in the rush to develop a formula which would enable the White House and its cronies to retain control of trading (according to the underlying thinking here) was that if those fraudulent assets are to be revalidated, the banks’ liabilities remain intact. (The same would apply even if, as we expect, Geithnerism collapses in ignominy, as there will be, as we predicted, few, if any ‘takers’ for repackaged ‘formerly toxic’ assets remarketed to restart the collapsed derivatives system).

Anyway, the upshot of this is that since the banks are liable for the fraudulent off-balance sheet assets, this means in practice that the off-balance sheet assets are in effect on-balance sheet! So this appears to be another case of shooting oneself and then hanging oneself afterwards.

But the situation has CHANGED during the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings as will be explained.

• 24th April: The Editor attends a Press Conference off the Press Room given by the Canadian Minister of Finance and the Governor of the Bank of Canada. The meeting was held in between sessions of the Group of Seven (G-7). The Editor was able to take the microphone, and asked why discussions at these meetings were focused on repairing a broken financial system by attempting to restore the integrity of ‘Structured Products’ (derivatives) which had been demonstrated to be worthless and fraudulent inter alia because there is NO RECOURSE to the underlying source of real money (e.g. from the original mortgagor).

• It was tantamount to repairing a collapsed building with faulty cement.

The Editor pointed out that the Bank of Canada (unspoken, of course: which was deeply involved in dodgy financial operations preceding this crisis) and the Ministry of Finance know perfectly well that derivatives assets are fraudulent. He concluded by mentioning that ‘there IS a straightforward solution: it’s called trading on the books’.

At this, the room erupted and the Governor commented: ‘I thought there’d be a question like this, which is why a representative from the G-7 is at this meeting’! The clear implication was that the Governor of the Bank of Canada knows all about the G-7-Approved private sector Dollar System Refunding Programme using sovereign LOAN funds referenced in earlier reports, which would reliquefy the banks ON THE BOOKS, deliver massive ongoing taxation accruals to the US Treasury (and to the British Treasury as this programme is to be run from London, and trading funds held within the UK financial jurisdiction for 24 hours are liable for UK tax).

However after these comments, the Governor reverted to his script consistently with the ‘line’ at these meetings, which is to avoid all references to Fraudulent Finance, Ponzi Schemes, criminal operations, diversion, the Bush Crime Family and stealing of funds, and the ransacking of private monies which these people know all about but which are taboo subjects in these refined circles.

• 24th April: The Editor is informed that key Trustees have been put ‘on standby’ for payment in the coming week, starting on Monday. This would be consistent with the requirement imposed on the 147 perpetrators for stolen and diverted funds to be ‘restored’ by close of business on 24th April. As of 9.00pm EST on Saturday evening in the Press Room, where this report was being prepared, the Editor had not received any information about arrests having taken place.

• FACT: What normally happens is that these sequences follow a standard pattern, and that when the payments are anticipated WITHOUT draconian action having been taken, as on this occasion (?), the payments are aborted. So, pending confirmation of remittances (which may well be quite hard to come by) it won’t be possible to tell whether this nightmare is indeed coming to an end.

• 25th April: HOWEVER, M. Dominique Strauss-Khan, the Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, told the media repeatedly on Saturday that ‘green shoots of recovery’ HAVE been detected and that the Fund’s view, thanks to substantial ‘progress’ which he says has been made at these meetings [see below], is that these will mature into signs of real recovery by around the third quarter, with tangible growth emerging in the first half of 2010.

WHAT LIES BEHIND STRAUSS-KAHN’S CONFIDENCE IN RECOVERY?
This makes no sense whatsoever in view of facts such as that a further five million foreclosures are anticipated in the United States in due course, with obvious implications for unemployment and consumption, while losses sustained to date arising from the crisis are now estimated in the many trillions of dollars. The Editor learned at one meeting, held in the IMF Governors’ Board Room, that the total value of new development contracts worldwide that have actually been cancelled since September last year exceeds $1,600 billion. And given the unprecedented contractions in real Gross Domestic Product predicted for the key European countries and Britain, these assertions from the IMF’s Managing Director fly in the face of all available evidence, even though the British Chancellor of the Exchequer used similar language recently (and was ridiculed for his pains).

GOLD, CHINA, RUSSIA & BRAZIL’S $1.0 TRILLION TAKEN FROM DISGORGED BUSH LOOT
So what on earth could M. Strauss-Kahn have been talking about? Here’s the likely answer:

(1) That the International Monetary Fund has acquired a large volume of gold which went for smelting very recently, has been separately confirmed by several key sources.

(2) The Wall Street Journal reported on 25th April that China, Brazil and Russia are to purchase the IMF’s first-ever bond denominated in Special Drawing Rights (SDRs). This is the IMF’s own unit of denomination, consisting of nothing but its name. It is backed by NOTHING WHATSOEVER. (Certain IMF statistics are denominated in SDRs, so that the poor analyst has to translate the numbers into dollars in order to get a ‘handle’ on what they mean).

• FACT: Assets denominated in SDRs will be as FRAUDULENT as the worthless ‘toxic’ derivatives with which we are familiar, since the SDR has no backing whatsoever and exists only in name. If, as we suspect, the intention is to launch this new SDR-denominated bond as a prelude to introducing a new generation of ‘asset’ which can be exploited along lines similar to the derivatives, the seeds have been sown for a NEW BUBBLE, which will implode just like the derivatives bubble.

And the IMF’s reputation and standing will be destroyed along with the SDR bond mountain that we believe is liable to take off as a consequence of this duplicitous ‘smoke and mirrors’ arrangement. The phrase ‘money laundering’ of course also springs readily to mind.

(3) Brazil is reported by The Wall Street Journal to be contributing up to $1.0 trillion which will be used to purchase these IMF Special Drawing Right-denominated bonds. BUT SEE BELOW…

(4) All of a sudden, the IMF has started signalling not only that ‘the worst may now be over’, but that global economic growth will be restored starting late this year and into 2010.

(5) China’s reserves of gold have risen very sharply, from around 600 tonnes, to over 1000 tonnes.

RECONSTRUCTION OF WHAT APPEARS TO HAVE TAKEN PLACE
It will be recalled that China, having obtained lien power from the World Court, demanded that the United States pay debts owed to it following the expiry of the 70-year maturity period of historical debts which the United States had reneged on and which may have explained the stealing of The Queen’s gold that we exposed in 2007, an operation that had to be aborted after our exposure, and the consequent restoration of the gold to its rightful owner.

Very recently, the Chinese declined to accept US currency or Treasuries, and tensions rose to fever pitch when President Obama reportedly ‘refused’ a Chinese demand that the United States must pay China in gold, a state of affairs that reconfirmed that China has lost confidence in the US dollar. China demanded that its payment must be ‘guaranteed’: and the only guaranteed means of payment is in gold. We therefore believe that what has taken place is the following:

• The large volume of gold recently ‘acquired’ by the IMF and smelted as always happens when the Fund acquires gold, has been credited for the account of CHINA, fulfilling China’s requirement.

• To satisfy the other side of the balance sheet, Brazil, as noted above, will suddenly be funding the IMF to the colossal tune of $1.0 trillion. This is FAR MORE than Brazil owns, which is why not a lot has emerged about this deal (certainly, nothing on that score that the Editor has been able to pick up in the Press Room and at the various meetings he has so far attended). So where has this huge sum of money suddenly materialised from?

• Answer: From hidden Bush Crime Family diverted and stolen funds stashed in Brazil.

In other words, the corners of this ‘smoke and mirrors’ triangle consists of China, the IMF and Brazil. Which helps to explain a number of recent developments, viz:

• The appearance of President Obama at the recent Organization of American States (OAS) meeting in Mexico, although of course this was a pre-arranged forum. But these meetings are in fact the outer face of what goes on behind the scenes. Deals were being done below the radar (including drug-trafficking and laundering transactions) as is always the case on these occasions.

• The fanfare with which the G-20 was ‘relaunched’ in London on 2nd April, when the Brazilian President Lula was seen hobnobbing with Presidents and Royalty at Buckingham Palace. All of a sudden, Brazil is on the map, but NOT for the reasons commonly supposed. No. The reason Brazil has ‘risen’ in the hierarchy of nations is that the Brazilian Government appears to have been very diligent in cooperating to freeze and confiscate the Bush Crime Octopus’s ill-gotten funds which have been accumulated in Brazilian institutions.

UPDATE, SUNDAY 26TH APRIL: 5:00pm EST: TRIANGLE ALREADY COMING UNSTUCK?
Notwithstanding the accuracy of the foregoing (reconfirmed to us on Sunday afternoon), the new arrangements to get the White House off the hook and able to exploit trading as intended, seemed ALREADY TO BE COMING UNSTUCK ON SUNDAY. Two days earlier, the Brazilian Finance Minister attending the Spring Meetings, Guido Mantega, apparently dismissed the substance of the Fund’s proposed sale of bonds denominated in SDRs as ‘insufficient’ and ‘premature’. However this was not revealed until the 26th, implying that the Brazilians had woken up to the likelihood that they have been pressurised to provide the third side of the triangle against their better judgment.

Should the Brazilians demur (which seems likely), the situation will be completely out of control since one element of the surreptitious ‘smoke and mirrors’ gold and money laundering operation will have been completed without the corresponding, albeit fraudulent, matching transaction.

Mantega was also reported by Bloomberg (on Sunday) as having said that any contributions by the four largest developing nations would be ‘provisional’, pending reforms that would increase their say in the forum of the International Monetary Fund. Because the United States is now beholden to these countries, the US Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner, said in a Treasury statement issued in the Press Room that he supports a ‘realignment’ of power in the Fund to reflect ‘the realities of the global economy’, along with a reduction of the number of IMF Board Members from 24 to 20.

That won’t please the Europeans, especially the British, one little bit.

WHERE THE $1.0 TRILLION IS FEATURED IN THE G-7 COMMUNIQUE
The ‘Statement of the G-7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors’ Meeting’ dated 24th April carefully included a reference to the $1.0 trillion, in a sudden outbreak of ‘transparency’. Actually, what we observe is ‘candour’, which should NEVER be confused with TRUTH.

The text states:

‘We welcome progress being made in mobilizing temporary bilateral financing for the IMF; this financing will be rolled over into the IMF’s New Arrangements to Borrow, which in turn will be increased by up to $500 billion and see its membership expanded. We will work to implement the $250 billion general SDR allocation, as well as to use the additional resources from the IMF’s agreed gold sales to support the poorest, consistent with the IMF’s new income model. We are implementing the initiative to provide at least $250 billion in trade finance’.

• Total: $1.0 trillion.

The next paragraph begins: ‘We welcome the IMF’s introduction of new facilities, such as the Flexible Credit Line…’. This is to be another element of the new use that is to be made of SDRs, involving monthly credit extensions which could be construed as inflationary and will certainly underpin the intended exploitation of SDR-denominated bonds/assets that we detect.

IMF ARRANGEMENT THOUGHT TO REPLACE THE LOMBARD ODIER SCHEME
It is further believed that our exposure of the Lombard Odier Swiss guaranteed insurance wrap arrangement which was to have been operated in conjunction with the known CIA operative or asset Warren Buffett, literally ‘blew’ that scheme, which may explain the apparent earlier intent of the White House and therefore the IMF not to respond to this Editor’s routine application for press accreditation for this Spring Meeting (which was in turn apparently ‘blown’ when we indicated that this would free up the Editor to criticise the IMF and the World Bank, which is quite hard to do if you are at the same time accepting their generous hospitality).

The present analysis criticises the arrangement that is identified here, but it should be borne in mind that the Fund jumps to the command of the White House, whatever may be alleged to the contrary. The World Bank is of course a creature of the White House, and is currently fronted by the rather competent but colourless CIA operative Mr Robert Zoellick. Listening to Robert Zoellick on Saturday, the Editor formed the view that he has a very good grasp of his responsibilities and brief.

Anyway, the point here is this:

• The IMF SDR bond arrangement, financed by disgorged Bush Crime Family money from Brazil, effectively REPLACES the Lombard Odier scheme which collapsed after we had exposed it.

• It is designed with White House approval (hence Lula’s recently publicised close association with President Obama) to provide the new platform which is to be used to launch the fresh generation of ‘assets’ which (we believe) will soon grow up ‘alongside’ revived ‘legacy assets’ until these have been ‘successfully’ transferred onto the US Treasury’s books, in exchange for the ‘new generation’ of exotic Treasury ‘legacy’ instruments’ with extremely long maturities, probably varying from 30 to 45 or even 50 years out into the future. But there will be no ‘legacy’, since the ‘Trashets’ exchanged for these exotic US Treasury instruments will have no value, just as the paper that replaces them will have no value (i.e. their backing will be spurious).

The idea that such trash will be ‘worth something worthwhile’ in 25 years’ time is deviant stupidity. Incidentally, Paul Volcker has told the President to his face that Mr Geithner’s arrangements are absolutely unacceptable and, by implication, fraudulent.

With the new IMF ‘Flexible Credit Line’ in place, the prospect and probable intention is for outside parties quickly to become involved as counterparties, so that the International Monetary Fund will henceforth become the central player in what we foresee to be a new generation of exotic funding which, as noted above, will be JUST AS FRAUDULENT AS DERIVATIVES given that Special Drawing Rights are backed by nothing at all, except the very favourable standing of the Fund, which will be destroyed when the Fund’s reputation collapses along with the prospective SDR bond bubble.

WITH CHINA OUT OF THE WAY AND THE WHITE HOUSE’S DEMANDS ‘SATISFIED’, WHAT NEXT?
If this analysis is correct, China has been dealt with and the Geithner arrangements are in the process, as a direct result of developments during the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings and the transfer of the huge volume of gold to China which we think occurred on 24th April, of being given the kiss of life, having shown (as we predicted) every sign of being stillborn. With the IMF at the centre of the carousel, revival of the derivatives sector so that these false assets can at least be transferred progressively onto the Treasury’s books as described, may proceed, and Mr Geithner needn’t be fired immediately. Paul Volcker, who made a number of very sober comments at the seminar that the Editor attended on Saturday, won’t be amused, but he’s not at the White House.

In particular, Volcker will be chagrined that the SDR, backed by zilch, is to become the new asset of preference, exploitable as was never intended, without any discernible steps being taken to back it by anything except the existing air which sustains it. No doubt Paul Volcker will be having further words with the President on this score. The IMF’s credit lines will extend credit based on NOTHING. And Volcker will doubtless be pointing out that even though the Oval Office and the Treasury will be associated with the Fund in this venture, that doesn’t make what is being proposed any less fraudulent. It simply incorporates the International Monetary Fund as an institutional co-conspirator in the blatant perpetration of financial fraud against future generations of Americans.

And to use the unbacked SDR as the lynch-pin for the refunding of the whole world seems to us to be inviting a catastrophe which, despite all the waffle that the Editor has so far listened to at these Spring Meetings, will, once again, NOT BE ANTICIPATED.

Because as with Geithner Plan Number One, the Treasury will be accumulating vast quantities of completely unnecessary debt which could be avoided if it were to come to its senses and permit implementation within the United States of the G-7-Approved private sector Refunding Programme using the LOAN funds provided for the purpose but which had to be withdrawn effective from 29th January 2009 because President Obama broke his signed, formal undertakings on that score: and so far as the sovereign lenders were concerned, 19 months of glaring, in-your-face, US criminalist abuse of their funds was enough, thank you very much.

SENSE THAT ‘SOLUTIONS’ ARE DRIVEN BY LUST TO REVITALISE TRADING
We have a distinct sense from all this that the exotic IMF arrangements outlined here represent compromises reached in order to astisfy the White House, rather than objective solutions that have been brought forward in order to meet the needs of the International Monetary Fund’s constituent government clients. This perspective is reinforced by the obvious fact that what is discussed for the consumption of the world’s press here is the front-facing information that is presented to the people, and which masks the sordid deals and trade-offs, that are reached behind the scenes.

This has been more obvious than usual this year, because on the several occasions when the Editor has so far been allowed to ask why he never hears words like Fraudulent Finance, Ponzi Schemes and criminal enterprise etc. mentioned, the point has been taken politely (for instance by the Governor of the Bank of Canada and also, separately, by the Finance Minister for Zambia) but then wholly dropped, with the rest of the answer focused on the ‘line’, which is all about how the Fund and the ‘rich’ countries are ‘responding’ to the crisis.

In other words, discussion of the criminal, fraudulent CAUSE of the calamity, and of the fact that this is a CRIMINAL FINANCE crisis first and foremost, rather than primarily a systemic crisis, is taboo.

And the reason for THAT is that the White House, CONTRARY to advice tendered by Paul Volcker, but of course influenced by the Clintons (for heaven’s sake) intends to reconstitute the carousel and the Fraudulent Finance operations, come what may. It is impervious to common sense. And its boss, the National Security Council, which controls the CIA controllers, tells Obama what to do.

NEXT STEP: THE SETTLEMENTS, OR SOME OF THEM…
Which leaves the Settlements, or some of them. Here we observe that the stimulus money that the President ‘fought for’ as though he was still fighting the election, HAS NOT MATERIALISED.

On 20th April, the Editor was informed that the US States were expecting to be paid stimulus funds that had been agreed upon, for them to finance infrastructure and other projects, as well as some welfare payments, and that the payments to the US States were due that week.

On 25th April, the Editor learned that Pennsylvania HAD TO BORROW $480 million, just to finance its immediate unemployment benefit obligations, subject to receipt of $18 billion pledged to it by the Federal Government, much of which is urgently need to fill an immense hole in its public employee pension arrangements, clearly implying that the payments to the US States had NOT taken place.

In some supermarket stores, there are hardly any customers. New York City diners that the Editor uses that were full of clientele even the last time he was in the United States in March, are almost empty much of the time. THE STIMULUS MONEY IS OR WAS, NOT AVAILABLE.

In the light of the foregoing developments (China out of the way and the White House having stitched up a variant of the Geithner Plan without in fact telling anyone), certain Settlements payments will probably now go ahead, and the States may finally get their delayed stimulus money.

Moreover the deliberate talking-up of the prospects for recovery late this year and into 2010 by Dominique Strauss-Kahn, in the face of quite appalling data and further shocks which can be seen lurking on the horizon, tells us that the Trustees who have been told to be on standby this time may actually find that they are paid and can ‘spend’ their funds.

We cannot enter into ANY second-guessing as to which categories of recipient may be paid, as it is not even certain that these deductions are solid (although as a first-hand, on-the-spot observer here in Washington, the Editor has a clear sense that they are). Quite apart from anything else, if there are any further problems, M. Strauss-Kahn is going to have egg all over his face in short order, so that any ambition he may harbour of succeeding M. Sarkozy will not be realised.

THE LATEST OFFICIAL DERIVATIVES NUMBERS
The IMF’s latest Financial Stability Report was not available from the printers but the Statistical Appendix was obtained. Table 4 shows that the notional value of derivatives contracts outstanding at end-June 2008, using Bank for International Settlements statistics adjusted for double-counting, stood at $683,725 billion, compared with $595,407 billion six months earlier.

Thus the notional value of these (actually worthless) ‘trashets’ rose by nearly $90 trillion ahead of the ‘lockdown’ of the $14.0 trillion in mid-September 2008 which occurred as the direct result of the advice we gave that the exploitation of the loan funds since 19th-20th June 2007 when they were first made available, was quite intolerable and should be made to cease by having the loan funds withdrawn. This advice was accepted. The rest is history.

As recently as the end of June 2006, the notional value of derivatives ‘assets’ outstanding, was $370,178 billion: so the volume doubled in the two years to mid-2008. Since the carousel stalled in mid-September 2008 (although compounding will have continued), the really interesting number will only surface into the public domain this time next year in the IMF data.

QUANTIFIED EUROPEAN BANK LOSSES
An IMF Working Paper which was the subject of the mentioned seminar, entitled ‘Financial Stability Frameworks and the Role of Central Banks: Lessons from the Crisis’, by Erlend Wlater Nier, shows quantified losses arising from the crisis attributed to banks in key European countries.

The figures shown are as follows: Banks in Italy, $2.4 billion; Netherlands, $12.1 billion; France, $25.1 billion; Belgium, $10.8 billion; Switzerland, $54.3 billion; United Kingdom, $61.3 billion; and Germany, $56.0 billion. It should be pointed out also that European banks are compliant with the Basel-II requirements monitored and brokered by the Bank for International Settlements.

Yet European banks (especially the big German and British banks) have accumulated even larger portfolios of rubbish fraudulent assets than even the US banks that we have described as criminal enterprises. How come, then, that the big US money center banks are not or have not been Basel-II compliant when some of the European banks which are in an even worse position, are compliant?

UK TREASURY TAKING EXPENSIVE LESSONS FROM BANKERS REPONSIBLE FOR THE CHAOS
One could go on for ever identifying the stupidities and aberrations of these people, but we’ll close with some revealing information published in The Times, of London, very recently, in an instance of the ‘mainstream’ here doing a first-rate job. The report revealed that the British Treasury is paying vast fees, thought to have exceeded $150 million to date, to the very bankers whose ‘irresponsible’ behaviour has resulted inter alia in the British Government having to increase its indebtedness in the space of the year to come, by more than the entire volume of debt incurred by the Government of the United Kingdom since it first started borrowing from the Bank of England in 1692.

Specifically, Deutsche Bank, Credit Suisse and Citibank have all been hired at enormous cost as advisers to the Treasury, suggesting that the Treasury has lost control and basically had no idea what was going on in its own bailiwick. The Credit Suisse team is based at Canary Wharf, the new high-rise financial sector development to the East of the City of London, but decamps regularly to the Treasury. Its team consists of at least 20 people. The Deutsche Bank team of four experts in Fraudulent Finance includes an Irish dealmaker who advised Barclays on its failed bid for ABN Amro. Credit Suisse and Deutsche Bank alone are believed to have scooped $100 million sterling equivalent between them, and separate fees are being shelled out to Citigroup, which had to be bailed out by the US authorities.

The impression to be gained from this exposure is that the British Treasury had no clue what was happening, and so was completely taken by surprise by the events of mid-September 2008 and their consequences: which probably explains why the British Treasury is staggered that a solution exists which has the capacity to reliquefy the banks without incurring any Treasury debt while at the same time delivering massive windfall tax accruals to the Exchequer.

• It’s called trading on the books.

• UPDATE: 27TH APRIL: 9:00pm EST: IMPORTANT CLOSING POSTSCRIPT:
As a general rule, when divisions arising at these international meetings are openly reported in the ‘mainstream’ media, the disagreements alluded to do not reflect the specific underlying tensions accurately. The cracks in the parched ground at the surface appear narrow, masking cavernous voids beneath. Such seems to be the outcome of the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings ending in Washington, DC, on Sunday, amid considerable dissension and acrimony.

Simply put, with at least $34 trillion having been stolen and diverted by the Bush Crime Nexus, nothing like the total has yet been recovered under Obama, who knew about this state of affairs long before the Inauguration, has had more than his first 100 days to impose his will on the grim situation and to remove all who have been standing in the way of the resolution, and has failed to deliver. Accordingly, the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings 2009 took place essentially in a financial vacuum. No mention whatever was made of these colossal thefts, and the Editor detected only one obscure hint of the criminal dimension – indicating with crystal clarity that the Fund operates in a virtual environment, the parameters of which are dictated (we know for a fact) by the White House.

For public consumption, the world’s press has got hold of the idea that the divisions between the financial powers that surfaced at the Spring Meetings concerned inter alia a failure to agree upon how to raise $500 billion in additional funding for the International Monetary Fund that was pledged at Gordon Brown’s G-20 jamboree at Canning Town, London, on 2nd April. It appears that over $300 billion has been ‘pledged’; but as we all know, ‘pledges’ and undertakings, following untold years of double-cross, lies and duplicity by the US Treasury, are devoid of all meaning. Deceit is catching, and, like pig flu, it’s become a worldwide epidemic. So far, no actual hard money (with the possible exception of a Japanese amount) has been forthcoming. It’s been all talk and very little action.

A second reported dispute that erupted during the Spring Meetings concerned the vexed issue of representation on the Board of the International Monetary Fund. Here, the open press reports, and the buzz in the Press Room, was that China, Brazil and India are throwing their new weight around by expressing reservations about their prospective and ASSUMED (by the United States and the IMF) participation in the exotic IMF funding arrangements described in part above, pending a full reform of their ‘quotas’ in the Bretton Woods institutions that represent their voting power, and an expansion of their status. The Times of London summed up the position, as perceived for public consumption, thus: ‘Along with other emerging market nations, China is reluctant to make bigger financial commitments in the IMF without being allowed a much greater part in decision-making at the Fund and its sister body the World Bank’.

Additionally, tensions emerged above the radar over attempts to persuade more countries to make one-off crisis contributions to the Fund’s resources, or to increase their existing commitments: the word ‘commitment’ in this unpleasant environment being meaningless: collectivisation is admired in theory by these brainwashed socialist ideologues, but resisted in actual practice when it comes to forking out hard cash. And really, since there’s a money famine, where’s the incentive?

And following years of the rampant, in-your-face corruption orchestrated by the Bush Crime Family (for DVD, Dachau) working hand-in-glove with his top criminal trader, Dr Alan Greenspan – with the Bush dimension of the DVD-controlled element of the CIA secretly financing the ‘Islamic Terror’ operation, while Greenspan, assisted these days, one suspects, by Rahm Emanuel, presides over the secret funding of the opposite dimension of the dialectic, namely the hardened Israeli Nazi war party – the whole world has been corrupted, and the dirty tricks and duplicity deployed by the US criminalist intelligence gangs are being replicated by other powers, notably the big emerging ones.

(Encouragingly, the new Israeli Government has just explicitly stated that it will not be so stupid as to attack Iran; but the underlying objective of getting the United States to do Israel’s dirty work in the Middle East, remains unchanged).

Some of the new ‘big players’, notably Brazil, still need training in how to recognise that they are being targeted by US ‘Black Arts’ operatives into making ‘commitments’ that they’ll come to regret. Thus, as soon as it became known (two days after the event) that the Brazilian Finance Minister, Guido Montaga, had expressed reservations (about the rôle assigned to Brazil as described in this report), we formed the impression that the Brazilians had got decidedly cold feet, having belatedly realised that they may have been dragooned into what will inevitably turn out to be a typical US ‘bait and switch’ stitch-up. If they have ‘twigged’ that they are being duped, they are learning fast.

Given the sophistication of routine US official duplicity, the rule these new powers should follow without deviation is: don’t make commitments or agree to anything with the Americans that you don’t feel comfortable with, which in practice means that you must have the ‘money in the bank’ before signing up for anything that Washington tries to stick to you. That may well mean not doing deals with these people at all, certainly not without a very long (Green)spoon.

In this connection, the ‘mainstream’ media got the entire dynamic back to front. Quoting the London Times one more time, ‘China, Brazil and India led developing nations in forcing through measures under which the IMF will sell bonds on world markets to raise additional funding as an alternative to some countries offering longer-term loans’.

In reality, the scheme to sell SDR-denominated bonds was concocted to complete the corrupt triangle described above under pressure from the White House which tells the IMF in general, and Dominique Strauss-Kahn in particular, what to do. And this White House is taking its instructions from Bush 41 and Greenspan. This information comes from impeccable sources.

• It is consistent with this Editor’s elaboration above that ‘developments’ at the Spring Meetings were driven by the imperatives laid down by the White House and NOT by the needs of the IMF’s constituent Governments. Which means that the IMF is PERVERTING ITS JOB.

Moreover since the basis of the putative arrangements is rotten, as described, it is NO SURPRISE that no sooner have they been deconstructed (by us), than they start to unravel. In this connection, not only have the Brazilians allowed their acute reservations and nervousness about being set up by the Americans to be known, but it has been specifically reported to us that the Chinese have been advised not to touch the IMF’s proposed SDR bonds with a thousand-foot bargepole.

Which of course probably means that the SDR-denominated bond scheme, like the Lombard Odier insurance-wrap scheme and the Geithner-Paulson-Obama operation on behalf of the ‘privileged’ to revalidate the moribund and dead derivatives sector so that the crooks can recover their currently unrealisable ‘value’, leaving future US generations holding the bag, won’t get off the ground either.

This postscript analysis is closing because the Editor is now suddenly in receipt of dramatic further information which will more conveniently be publicised in a separate report that is being started immediately. Thank you for your attention!

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. Some versions have a ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

SHARP INCREASE IN GLOBAL TENSION SINCE THE G-20

RELEASES SABOTAGED BY MERKEL, WHO IS THREATENED BY SARKOZY

Tuesday 7 April 2009 00:01

UNDERLYING ISSUES NOT EVEN MENTIONED IN THE COMMUNIQUE

• ‘NEW WORLD ORDER’ INVOKED FROM THE G-20 PLATFORM

• G-20 COMMUNIQUE SILENT ON THE CAUSES OF THE CRISIS

• EYES GLAZE OVER AT SIGHT OF OBAMA AND BROWN

• ‘FOR US THE WAR NEVER ENDED’, ETC

• GERMAN CADRES’ ANGER DIRECTED TOWARDS THE BRITISH

• SARKOZY AND MERKEL AT EACH OTHERS’ THROATS OVER THE RELEASES

• SARKOZY REPORTEDLY THREATENS MERKEL WITH ‘ELIMINATION’

• ELYSEE TREATY AND E.U. ITSELF THREATENED BY FRANCO-GERMAN BREACH

• BANKERS WHO STAND IN THE WAY POST-G-20 WILL BE ‘ELIMINATED’

• ROTHSCHILDS ‘DEALT WITH’ BY RUSSIAN AND CHINESE INTEL THUGS

• THE GERMAN-ORIGINATED ‘BAIT AND SWITCH’ ROUTINE

• U.S. POWER STRUCTURES MODELLED ALONG LENINIST LINES

• THE STRAIGHTFORWARD DRUG-TRAFFICKING TEST

• DRUG MONEY PROCEEDS AND THE INTERBANK MARKET

• THAT SEPTEMBER 2008 MONEY ‘LOCKDOWN’

• GERMAN MOLES INSIDE THE BRITISH OFFICIAL STRUCTURES

• CORRUPT TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS TO BE TAKEN OVER BY BRITAIN

• PROFESSORS CLIMB ONTO OUR BANDWAGON

• HYPOCRISY AND CANT IN THE G-20 COMMUNIQUE

• CRUCIAL FISCAL UNDERTAKINGS IN PARAGRAPH SIX

• THE PRIVATE MEETING BETWEEN THE QUEEN AND PRESIDENT OBAMA

• SUDDEN CHANGE OF LANGUAGE AT THE FED

• FED PUSH FOR EXEMPTION FROM STATUTORY DEBT CEILING

• FED NOW LESS CONCERNED ABOUT DEBT BECAUSE OF REFUNDING?

• THE POST-G-20 CIA ‘COLLAPSING’ OPERATION

• FULL G-20 COMMUNIQUE TEXT APPENDED AS NOTE 5.

• RECENT (OECD) TAX INFORMATION EXCHANGE AGREEMENTS APPENDED AS NOTE 6.

• MADOFF ‘VICTIMS’ LIST: Two reports were posted on 6th February 2009 containing the entire list of customers of Bernard L. Madoff Securities, Inc.. Because the list is so huge, we divided it into two segments: Clients A-N; and clients O-Z, plus a Miscellaneous Section. See: Archive. Our list is the easiest to load and clearest of the lists that have been reproduced privately on the Internet.

• We have just published: International Currency Review Volume 34, #2 on Systemic Fraudulent Finance and The Legalisation of Financial Corruption. Also just published are issues of our titles Economic Intelligence Review, London Currency Report, Interest Rate Service and Arab-Asian Affairs. For further details, please check the second white panel on the Home Page.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice is comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the Internet Security Solution software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

• DONATIONS: You can help finance these exposures (which the Editor has to prepare on top of his normal publishing responsibilities) by sending us a donation. Press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

• The CONTACT US facility is found in the red box throughout this combined website.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

• ‘NEW WORLD ORDER’ INVOKED FROM THE G-20 PLATFORM
Indicative of the supreme arrogance of the cabal of internationalists (globalists) who think they know best for the whole of humanity, the controlled British Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, inserted the keywords ‘New World Order’ in his tedious sermon at the Group of Twenty indulgence-fest on 2nd April. Manifestly, the intelligence operative who wrote that speech for him looks upon those who don’t sit on their brains with utter contempt.

It was Mr Gorbachëv (Orbach or Korbach) who recycled this World Revolution control-phrase in the late 1980s, and it was his clandestine ally, George H. W. Bush Sr., who trumpeted the phrase for the benefit of those whom Lenin called ‘the interested’ in the early 1990s.

The purpose of this gratuitous insult to our collective intelligence was to remind those whom Lenin called ‘the interested’ and their fellow-travellers that the G-20 bore-event was about progressing The New Underworld Order, by leveraging the consequences of years of purposely implemented Fraudulent Finance in the interests of the broader globalist agenda – a supposedly ‘Great Leap Forward’ towards an agenda that NOBODY in the world WANTS, beyond the tawdry confines of the controlled, self-important creatures who think they have a right to dictate how humanity should be directed, managed, destroyed, or all of the above.

G-20 COMMUNIQUE SILENT ON THE CAUSES OF THE CRISIS
The British taxpayer was reportedly lumbered with a bill for £50 million to pay for Brown’s globalist jamboree, which issued a Communiqué that conspicuously OMITTED any mention of the following keywords/phrases, thereby signalling with crystal cynical clarity that it did not address the issues underlying this criminal finance crisis:

• Derivatives or ‘Structured Products’

• Fraudulent Finance

• Criminal Finance

• Toxic Assets

• Legacy Assets

• Bribery

• Corruption

• Mafia/mafiya

• Tax evasion

• Drugs, drug-trafficking

• Inflation

• Hyperinflation

Thus the Communiqué SIDESTEPPED the issues that should have been discussed, in favour of bromides for the benefit of the gullible ‘mainstream’ media hoardes for whose ears the entire orchestrated charade was choreographed. The omission of ANY MENTION of these issues in the Communiqué reveals the total contempt of these people for the Press Room.

For days after this circus, the talking heads were still ‘analysing’ the ‘outcome’ of the G-20 meeting on the basis of the diversionary bromide-style Communiqué, thereby plastering the entire world with vacuous interpretations of what the ‘chosen’ operatives striding the revolutionary stage were imagined to have ‘agreed’ – without addressing the fundamental issues summarised above which are the keywords that these ‘analysts’ should have been searching for if they had been equipped with any discernment about what was going on.

• Update! Someone on The Times, London, has noticed that the Communiqué had NOTHING to say about Derivatives a.k.a. Toxic Assets a.k.a. ‘Structured Products’ a.k.a. FRAUDULENT FINANCE!
Writing in The Times, David Wighton argues that despite recognition by G-20 leaders that dealing with banks’ so-called ‘toxic assets’ is vital for the global recovery, very little was said about it in the official Communiqué. He adds: “Now that Mr Sarkozy and Mme Merkel have their crackdown on tax havens, perhaps they can show some leadership on more urgent problems”. [INCREDIBLE!!!!!!!!!!].

ACTUALLY, NOTHING WHATSOEVER was mentioned about Derivatives a.k.a. Toxic Assets a.k.a. ‘Structured Products’ a.k.a. FRAUDULENT FINANCE, because THEY ARE TRYING TO KICK-START THE CRIMINAL OPERATIONS and they don’t want the diverted press to focus on what they are doing. Furthermore, criminal operatives at the highest levels of Governments are vulnerable to EXPOSURE for their own participation in the ransacking of trillions of dollars.

•FACT: The REASON for the current ‘constipated’ state of affairs is that processes are in motion that threaten to entrap and expose VERY BIG NAMES; and everyone concerned is TERRIFIED that the lid cannot be forced down on the cauldron. That’s what the litigation referenced at the end of this report is all about, BUT IT’S MUCH, MUCH BIGGER than even the closest observers realise.

• MORE ARRESTS were reported to us in the afternoon of 7th April. This contradicts intelligence to the effect that anyone standing in the way will now, post G-20, be ‘eliminated’, but that does not preclude ongoing arrests of other co-conspirators and accessories to the fact of misdemeanours.
In fact, ‘liquidations’, we understand, have been ongoing for at least three weeks.

For (see below) the G-20 was a WATERSHED beyond which date the leeway shown to saboteurs in the past will no longer apply. It is surprising, perhaps, to hear of arrests still taking place. What is quite clear is that the Illuminati’s internal war, or the global financial intelligence warfare, has been ratcheted up to a much higher level of intensity. The G-20 event was probably the last time anyone on this foul stage crawling with rats is going to waste time trying to be polite. They had no choice on 1st-2nd April, because they were in the presence of The Queen, who is invariably very polite and is the epitome of good manners. But powerful operatives holding the highest official positions who have stolen vast sums of money and are desperate to avoid being exposed, are not about to waste time being polite, when they are so terrified of being fingered, and jailed for life.

EYES GLAZE OVER AT SIGHT OF OBAMA AND BROWN
The Editor had numerous better things to do than watch and listen to the wall-to-wall opinionated revolutionary internationalist propaganda drivel spouted by Gordon Brown, and has long since suffered from EGO (Eyes Glaze Over) at the sight of President Obama hogging yet another podium and lecturing the whole world, Fidel Castro-like, on what (unspoken) his DVD-CIA handlers want to eventuate. The arrogance of these controlled operatives who leverage power on the globalists’ stage is hard for normal people, let alone for jaundiced observers not accustomed to sitting on their brains, to tolerate.

But the silver lining here is that if these operatives continue thaumatroping (1) humanity with their sterile sermons, the whole world will soon be ‘switched off’ by this agitation, propaganda and self-regarding indulgence, which of course would be a Good Thing.

And indeed this is what will happen because if one fact is certain here, it is that these opinionated would-be jumped-up re-orderers of the world have no sense of proportion, no idea when they are overstepping the mark, and no inclination to cease and desist from their preaching of control-drivel for the supposed ‘benefit’ of humanity. Which of course is all very decidedly GERMAN.

The Dachau-based long-range Nazi strategic deception community behind the ‘globalisation’ thrust towards The New Underworld Order to procure German hegemony displays the one ineradicable characteristic of these people: an inability to know when to stop. This fatal characteristic was on display even as late as 1945, when Hitler was ordering his Generals to continue the War long after the remaining sparrows clinging to the few extant Berlin lamp posts knew that it had been lost.

‘FOR US THE WAR NEVER ENDED’, ETC
Which can remind us that the Nazi intelligentsia, who had decamped to the German Geopolitical Centre in Franco’s Madrid by 1942, were indifferent about the fate of Herr Hitler (Schickelgrüber), a criminal operative dredged up from the back streets of Vienna whom they regarded as expendable. On the contrary, they relished the post-Hitler prospect of implementing a sinister, gradualist long-range deception strategy epitomised by the phrase, found in the captured ‘Madrid Circular Letter’ (circa 1951): ‘Für uns ist der Krieg niemals vorbei’ (‘For us the war never ended’).

And as we have repeatedly elaborated, the other ongoing Nazi slogan of specific relevance to America’s predicament today was: ‘We shall build the Thousand-year Reich on the Ruins of the United States’ – a strategy expertly implemented by the DVD’s supremo in the United States, Dr Henry (‘call me ‘Henny’: no thanks) Kissinger, a disgusting quadruple agent who moved seamlessly from Princess Diana’s memorial service in Westminster Abbey to a nightclub that same evening where he was observed googling at a bellydancer.

President Obama despatched Kissinger and the Bush Family’s primary legal ‘fixer’ and former US Secretary of State James A. Baker III to Moscow in March to conduct discussions with the covert Soviets under Medvedev and GRU-Prime Minister Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin. They subsequently returned to the United States, it is believed, in the company of Gorbachëv, the former Andropov (Lieberman)-era head of the CPSU’s all-powerful Administrative Department and the chief long-range implementer of Andropov’s strategic deception strategy.

The use by President Obama’s handlers of Kissinger and Baker for this mission indicates rather clearly that the US political parties are of course two wings of the single Political Power – which is controlled by the ‘State within the State’ Intelligence Power under the heel of Bush Sr., directed in turn by the probable DVD supremo on the block, Dr Henry Kissinger.

It was this German Jew who persuaded the erstwhile pornographer Gerald Ford (a.k.a. Leslie Lynch King Jr.) to sack William Colby as Director of Central Intelligence and to instal, in his place, George H. W. Bush Sr., of like German Jewish background, thereby taking over the Central Intelligence Agency on behalf of the heirs of the Nazi Abwehr, Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst.

To ensure the ‘permanent’ allegiance of the CIA criminal enterprise (Bush Jr. referred to it as ‘our enterprise’) to the DVD, Bush Sr. later procured the renaming of the CIA’s Langley campus as the George Bush Center for Intelligence, which should read ‘George Bush Center for Terrorism’.

GERMAN CADRES’ ANGER DIRECTED TOWARDS THE BRITISH
Vituperative, uncontrolled fury emitted from certain quarters against The Queen and the British generally reflects anger at the reality that the Nazi DVD controllers are most decidedly NOT getting everything their own way ‘as we speak’. Some sources of these ignorant ventilations also fail to understand that France and Germany are basically interchangeable under the terms of the Treaty of the Elysée of 23rd January 1963, which is of INDEFINITE duration and specifically requires these two powers to reach quote ‘an analogous position’ unquote ahead of every international meeting involving both powers, in perpetuity.

Therefore, while Sarkozy and Merkel are at loggerheads (see below), they are simultaneously bound by the terms of that never-ending bilateral treaty, which is why they always pontificate IN UNISON against ‘the Anglo-Saxons’ (another piece of egregious nonsense) whenever one of these set-piece New World Order theatres is to be staged at some place near you (2).

SARKOZY AND MERKEL AT EACH OTHERS’ THROATS OVER THE RELEASES
Since the G-20 meeting, tensions between Sarkozy and Merkel are reported to have reached close to boiling point. We have been informed that President Obama did sign a document at that event requiring the releases to proceed – and that President Sarkozy was perhaps unwisely mollified by this development, so that he was able to set aside his earlier threat to implement his planned walk-out should the ‘deliverables’ not be forthcoming. That threat, it will be recalled, had been directed against the US President.

So one can imagine President Sarkozy’s unrestrained fury when he discovered, subsequent to the G-20 meeting, that Mr George Bush Sr.’s agent, Chancellor Angela Merkel, who has been bribed by Bush Sr. for about five years to stand guard over his accumulated ill-gotten gains stashed within the German financial system, has continued to stand in the way of the releases since 2nd April.

• STASI operative Merkel of course implements strategy and tactics dictated to her by the Nazi strategic deception continuum, Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst, Dachau, as well.

• SARKOZY REPORTEDLY THREATENS MERKEL WITH ‘ELIMINATION’
Given this stand-off, the apoplectic Sarkozy, who now hates the Bushes with a vengeance because (typically) he was double-crossed by George Bush Sr., is reported to have threatened Chancellor Merkel with ‘elimination’ if she continues to block the settlements, which is what she is reported to be doing. Specifically, Sarkozy is reported to have told the German Chancellor: ‘You have to do this, or you’re going to be gone’.

This huge breach between the Treaty of the Elysée partners has now become so extreme, that it threatens to scupper not just the 1963 bilateral Treaty of the Elysée, which is the foundation stone of forced ‘European unity’ itself, but also the cohesion of the German Nazis’ long-range entrapment strategy, the European Union Collective, which is based upon the structure mapped out in the Nazi document Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft (European Economic Community) published in Berlin in 1942, as previously (and repeatedly) reported by this service (3).

• ELYSEE TREATY AND E.U. ITSELF THREATENED BY FRANCO-GERMAN BREACH
The irony is that while Chancellor Merkel is implementing DVD blocking tactics, to sabotage the releases, she is also taking the risk that her intransigence in deference to the DVD and Bush Sr. will in fact rip the Elysée Treaty and therefore the European Union apart, thereby destroying the framework for German regional hegemony strategy – another instance of the German Nazi habit of always going too far.

A further irony here is that if Chancellor Merkel persists with her blocking behaviour, unless she is eliminated as Sarkozy has threatened, she will be doing us and the whole world an immense favour by perversely dismantling the insidious entrapment structure developed by the wartime Nazis and the German Geopolitical Centre in Madrid which has almost brought Britain to its knees.

BANKERS WHO STAND IN THE WAY POST-G-20 WILL BE ‘ELIMINATED’
The post-G-20 situation is meanwhile associated with a heightening of the intensity of the ongoing Illuminati bloodbath arising from this self-inflicted crisis. Hitherto this bloodletting has continued at a relatively subdued level, with banking sector saboteurs being ‘apprehended’ or arrested, rather than necessarily liquidated. But since the G-20 meeting, sanctions for any failure to cooperate as required have been sharply escalated. We understand that no leeway or mercy will now be shown, and that these sanctions are already being applied.

This is why we are now authoritatively advised that crooked bankers (and probably also corrupt Trustees) who sabotage any element of the post-G-20 financial release procedures will no longer simply be arrested, but will be ‘eliminated’ on the spot – by which is meant that they will be shot dead on sight, or else will be ‘zapped’ so that they suffer a heart attack.

Taken in the context of President Sarkozy’s reported threat that Chancellor Merkel will herself be ‘eliminated’ if her intransigence in blocking the settlements continues, we can now see that, post-G-20, the temperature and the level of international tension has been significantly raised – and that the G-20’s decisions are being perversely sabotaged by Germany.

This was probably inevitable, since tensions were already extremely high prior to the G-20 meeting, as witnessed by Sarkozy’s threat to walk out if the ‘deliverables’ were again impeded. So, having been through that ghastly meeting and having been deceived into believing that agreement to proceed with the releases had been reached, President Sarkozy feels bitterly betrayed by his own supposed ‘ally’, to whom he is supposed to be bound until the end of the solar system by the 1963 perpetual Treaty of the Elysée.

On the basis of past experience, this further satanic theatre of the absurd may just represent yet another instance of the dialectical game that these criminal operatives play, whereby yesterday’s identified villain is today’s beneficial influence, and tomorrow’s villain is a third party we hadn’t previously thought of. On the other hand, something tells the Editor that these new developments represent a very serious escalation of international tensions, exacerbated by fury at the objective fact that these ‘leaders’ assembled at great inconvenience and big expense to appear en masse in Canning Town with false smiles all round, only to find afterwards that the somewhat arrogant and disliked STASI-Chancellor Merkel was sabotaging part of the secret outcome of their meeting.

In particular the Editor was singularly impressed by the fact that as soon as he mentioned the intelligence, obtained from another source, that bankers standing in the way of the releases post-G-20 would be IMMEDIATELY ELIMINATED, this was instantly confirmed as accurate by a respected informant who could not have revealed it unless it had been mentioned by the Editor first.

• We were told: people who stand in the way will find that ‘they didn’t get to go home’.

In this connection, it is understood that two senior Directors on the Board of Citibank/Citigroup were ‘eliminated’ last week. When the Editor enquired whether this implied what he assumed it meant, the answer was in the affirmative; and the sources elaborated that ‘we think that they were zapped in some manner and suffered heart attacks’.

ROTHSCHILDS ‘DEALT WITH’ BY RUSSIAN AND CHINESE INTEL THUGS
Intelligence input received by this service also confirms that, standing in front of the Bush-Clinton-DVD-CIA Criminal Nexus, the three parties that have sabotaged the releases and the ‘final solution’ of this infernal Illuminati warfare all along have been the Rothschilds, the Connecticut Trust group of Trustee operatives, and Citibank. According to certain Jewish sources, no less, the Rothschilds’ behaviour has been dictated by their unwillingness to ‘lose their control’, or at least the degree of control to which they have been accustomed for generations.

Either during or shortly after the G-20 display in Canning Town, Russian and Chinese intelligence operatives (collaborating together under their long-range cooperative alliance) travelled to Paris, where they advised the Rothschilds there, that their ‘time is up’ and that they are required to yield. We were unable to establish why it was necessary for the Russians and Chinese to do this in Paris, given that the Rothschilds are headquartered these days in London. But it was stressed that the visit was not exactly a ‘friendly’ encounter.

And as previously noted, the Connecticut Trust group of Trustees, working for George Bush Sr., have indeed been in the habit of waiting for each successive attempt to procure the releases to be announced, attending at the relevant bank at the appointed date and time, creaming off the profit, and distributing it to designated recipients, as a consequence of which very large sums of money have accumulated in the bank accounts in question.

Further corrupt activity along these lines by these people will, we understand, result in them being summarily executed, like any bankers that may be foolish enough to persist, post-G-20, in standing in the way of resolution. A number of such Trustees have been ‘disposed of’ in the past after they got ‘too greedy’, but in the post-G-20 environment, no leeway is going to be allowed at all – which means that if this satanic impasse continues, we are going to see a number of bankers shot dead or ‘zapped’ in their offices, and Trustees gunned down at point blank range in the street.

As for Citibank, it seems that our early description of this institution as a criminal enterprise was a grotesque understatement on our part.

SECOND PHASE OF THE ICELANDIC LEG OF THE OCTOPUS ‘BLOWS’
The British press confirmed on 6th April 2009 that Iceland has hired Eva Joly, a Norwegian-French investigating magistrate who specialises in preparing complex fraud prosecutions, to advise the investigators and identify evidence of corruption. It will be recalled that the Bush Crime Family had been using Iceland as a laundering centre for elements of its Fraudulent Finance operations, and that the entire Icelandic financial system and the Icelandic krona went into meltdown last October after the Government had been forced to seize Kaupthing, Landsbanki and Glitnir, the country’s largest banks. Clearly, the Icelandic meltdown was an immediate consequence of the drying-up of liquidity in the system following the ‘lockdown’ event on 10th-12th September 2008 [see below].

The Daily Telegraph reported that a source close to the investigation said:

“We need serious help from Europe and the United Kingdom and tax havens to deal with the international aspects of this because it looks like there was a very elaborate network of crossholdings and money flowing overseas. It’s absolutely mind-boggling”.

It also looks as though the Icelandic authorities could benefit by a closer study of the background to their troubles, which they may not have understood, at the outset anyway: and that a good place for them to start might be with this website service.

THE GERMAN-ORIGINATED ‘BAIT AND SWITCH’ ROUTINE
The Franco-German Treaty of the Elysée was promoted by Dr Konrad Adenauer, the former Nazi-era Mayor of Cologne and friend of Schickelgrüber’s favourite German Jewish bankers, Drs Abs and Pferdmenges. Chancellor Adenauer is notorious for having told the Bundesrat that ‘we must never let the West know that our true orientation lies to the East’ – reflecting the historical realities that Nazism (National Socialism) and Communism (International Socialism) are dialectical twins and that German intelligence was resident inside the Kremlin (as it has been inside the White House and Downing Street) for many years: which explains the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact, and why the Nazis alternated between alliance with the German asset Josef Stalin (who weakened Russia by liquidating the officer corps) and attacking Russia, like rats in a sack. Among these Luciferian beings, loyalties and allegiances are strictly ephemeral, expendable, replaceable, and perfunctory.

The same has always been true of the DVD operative Mr George H. W. Bush Sr., whose modus operandi has invariably been the ‘bait and switch’ technique of turning on his trading partners (Saddam Hussein, Misolevic, Noriega, Sarkozy) as soon as they become too powerful, inciting his monumental lust and jealousy. Indeed the ‘bait and switch’ technique is quintessentially Leninist: and since the United States is in fact structured just like an overt Marxist-Leninist state, this should come as no surprise, either.

U.S. POWER STRUCTURES MODELLED ALONG LENINIST LINES
All overt Communist states have a ‘Security Council’ which is superior to the Government itself – the same model as is evident in the United States, where the National Security Council (NSC) appears to be subordinate to the Presidency but in fact tells it what to do.

In other key respects, too, the US control structure is identical to that of overt Communist régimes – with the standard power triangle consisting of the Intelligence Power (the ‘State within the State’), which is answerable to no-one, supposedly balanced by the Military Power (which it controls) and the Party (which it also controls, and which in the United States is divided into the two dialectical false ‘opposites’, Republican and Democrat).

That the Party is ONE is evident from the seamless interaction between the two wings – so that President Obama has no problem sending his supposed Republican ‘rivals’ Kissinger and Baker to Moscow to talk with the other false dialectical World Revolution ‘opposites’, the covert Soviets.

THE STRAIGHTFORWARD DRUG-TRAFFICKING TEST
If we step back for a moment to reflect on the staged propaganda delivered to the world by Messrs Brown and Obama in recent days, we can short-circuit queries about the bona fides of these two characters quite simply. The elementary way to establish whether Obama and Brown are genuine or controlled (a simple test that applies to everyone else on the stage as well), is to ask (even though we all know the answer):

• Has President Obama ordered the CIA to get out of drug trafficking?

• Has Prime Minister Gordon Brown ordered Government Operations-2 (GO-2) within MI6 to get out of drug distribution via its control of the two drug cartels distributing drugs in the United Kingdom, and its financing of the main political parties using drug money proceeds?

Of course the answer to both questions is no. By extension, we can further ask the subsidiary question: are they serving the interests of the American/British peoples, or not? And again the answer has to be: they can’t be, otherwise this would be their top priority, wouldn’t it. In that case, if they aren’t serving the interests of their populations, they must be serving some other interest – namely, of course, the internationalist One World Agenda, operating CONTRARY to the interests of the nation state, which it seeks to obliterate. Since the nation state is the natural human condition and has been found to serve the preferences and interests of human beings best, it follows that the One World Agenda does not meet the requirements of human beings, and can never do so.

France, Germany, China, the ‘former’ Soviet Union, Israel and other countries are also in the drug business: but that’s not the point. The issue is: do our leaders serve our interests?

And clearly, since they preside over Governments that are engaged in satanic operations (drug-trafficking and distribution) the purpose of which is to make money out of destroying people’s lives, they most certainly do not.

If Brown and Obama had stood on that Canning Town platform and condemned drug-trafficking and the participation of their own structures in this heinous activity, one might have been excused for perhaps taking them seriously.

And there are plenty of other devilish government-sanctioned activities to which they should be opposed, as well. But since neither of these ‘leaders’ condemned them – making no mention of any of the foregoing fundamental causes of the criminal finance crisis, which is degrading the whole world, in their pompous globalist dirges – neither of these two operatives should command our respect: except that President Obama is Head of State and, as previously mentioned, whatever the personality occupying this position, he or she must command a degree of deference because he or she represents the people who are, or ought to be (but are not), sovereign.

In 2005, a US operative said to the Editor of this service: ‘Don’t attack the drug operatives, or they will kill you’. Oh, so the problem is insoluble, is it? It can’t be resolved because anyone standing up to them will be murdered? President Obama cannot be expected to do the right thing because it’s too dangerous? Brown, ditto?

• Here’s a consideration for your attention. We have just broken this taboo. Would good people who may be reading this report care to join in? By all means reproduce what we have published here: be the Editor’s guest.

DRUG MONEY PROCEEDS AND THE INTERBANK MARKET
Now you will doubtless recall that, as previously reported by this service, the Executive Director of UNODC, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Sr. Antonio Maria Costa, was interviewed in the January 2009 issue of the Austrian journal Profil, and that in that interview he stated that in the second half of 2008 (a period which we think extended from mid-September onwards: see below), the ‘only new liquidity’ in the interbank market was drug money.

The other sources had been closed off – especially the illegal and corrupt misuse of the $14.0 trillion funds, including the Queen’s LOAN money within a total of $6.2 trillion that had been made available to finance the private sector on-the-books Refunding Programme which is the SOLUTION to the crisis, as agreed by the Group of Seven leading financial powers in June 2007, when The Queen appealed for this transparent trading to proceed ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’. The G-7 re-approved the private sector, revenue-generating refunding of the US Dollar System in 2008.

THAT SEPTEMBER 2008 MONEY ‘LOCKDOWN’
Following advice given and the steps taken at the beginning of September 2008, these funds (the entire $14.0 trillion) were placed into ‘lockdown’ between 10th and 12th September 2008, so that they could no longer be illegally exploited to finance the carousel, as previously explained. It was then only a matter of time before the Bush Crime Family-linked Madoff Ponzi scamming machine ran into severe trouble, in the context of the reported $7.0 billion of redemptions.

(Obviously it didn’t help that, according to The Jerusalem Post, Madoff had transferred $35 billion to the Israel Discount Bank via 181,000 separate wire transfers in the names of individual investors between March 2004 and the same month a year later) (4).

When ‘Sir’ R. Allen Stanford realised what was happening, he started to arrange for monies to be diverted from his various bank accounts – a state of affairs known to his one-man Antigua-based accountant, whose contract with Stanford expired on 31st December 2008. The accountant died suddenly on 1st January 2009.

From the information about drug money flows implied and given above, it can be assumed that one reason why the Great Powers do nothing whatsoever to terminate their structures’ drug-trafficking operations (except via token programmes designed to deflect criticism for public consumption) is that the resulting money flows lubricate the interbank market.

Which of course ties the banks, which are criminal enterprises, into the drug-trafficking business – explaining the corruption of the banks, which is justified on the basis of the argument that banks are neutral institutions which simply handle money flows.

Therefore, attempting to impose discipline and ‘standards’ on banks while Governments continue to sponsor and indulge in drug-trafficking, represents yet another display of the familiar duplicitous double-mindedness with which we have become familiar as we steadily strip the putrid layers of criminality off the legs of the criminal Octopus.

GERMAN MOLES INSIDE THE BRITISH OFFICIAL STRUCTURES
As in the United States, agents for the long-range Nazi strategic deception apparat are buried deep inside the UK structures, such as the Cabinet Office, the Treasury, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, the UK Ministry of Defence, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and the Department for Work and Pensions.

For instance, the ‘Europe Minister’, a ‘Blair Babe’ called Caroline Flint, said at the beginning of April that every operational unit of the British Army, the Royal Navy and the Royal Air Force will soon be available to fight under the EU flag in future wars ‘as part of an EU ‘force catalogue’’. Such crass, revolutionary anti-nation state abominations perpetrated by brainwashed political puppets proceed even as the German operation to entrap its Member States, most importantly Britain, is running into the sand as discussed above – reminding us that the EU is a deliberately structured ‘automaton’ which may keep on functioning long after its underpinning foundations have collapsed beneath it.

Moreover key personnel at the Bank of England have also been instrumental in furthering the long-range Abwehr strategy, whether ‘on the payroll’ or due to blackmail or other satanic pressures.

Thus a key figure at the Bank is a known de facto German agent, with an offshore bank account with Henry Ansbacher, British Virgin Islands (which harbours about 400,000 offshore corporations, the documents for which are stored in a concrete building there).

This crucial information emerged following the previously reported seizure by 300 heavily armed Metropolitan Police of the ‘Safety Lock Boxes’ in Mayfair, Edgeware and Hampstead on 2nd June 2008, as previously reported. ‘Payroll’ funds paid to this corrupt de facto agent for the DVD are believed to be siphoned via Deutsche Bank and UBS to the named bank in the British Overseas Territory, for the beneficiary whose account is in the name of Passenham.

CORRUPT TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS TO BE TAKEN OVER BY BRITAIN
In this context it is to be noted that the British Government is now in the process of bringing in legislation at Westminster, following a Commission of Inquiry headed by a British Judge, Sir Robin Auld, to suspend the Constitution of the Turks and Caicos Islands, to remove the Government and Cabinet, to close the single-camera House of Parliament (the House of Assembly) and to assume direct rule under the control of the Governor for an initial period of two years, in order to get to grips with the rampant corruption throughout the Territory‘s structures that the Commission has uncovered. The draft Order-in-Council to put this process into effect was submitted to Her Majesty The Queen in Council on 18th March and was laid before Parliament on 25th March. On the basis of current information, the takeover is expected to come into effect late this month.

Our Latin American service, The Latin American Times [Volume 20, Number 9], to be published in May 2009, will be devoted to this development.

PROFESSORS CLIMB ONTO OUR BANDWAGON
The Editor’s experience all his reporting life is that we stick our necks out in anticipation of what will take place. What we predict then takes place. Many months, perhaps even a year or more later, academics too timid to run the risk of sticking their necks out realise that what was predicted has indeed taken place. They then proceed to muscle in and to pontificate on the subject, having failed to anticipate what was coming down, but now, with the benefit of hindsight, claiming 100% of the credit for their ‘wise prognostications’ for themselves.

Current instances of this syndrome include pronouncements by the Nobel Laureate (therefore by definition, ‘prescient’) economist Joseph Stiglitz, and Professor K. Black, a Professor of Economics and Law with the University of Missouri:

• Dr Joseph Stiglitz, 3rd April 2009: ‘The Obama Administration’s $500 billion or more proposal to deal with America’s ailing banks has been described by some in the financial markets as a win-win-win proposal’, Stiglitz writes in The New York Times.

‘Actually, it’s a win-win-lose proposal: the banks win, investors win, and taxpayers lose’.

The (Geithner) proposal is ‘marked by overleveraging in the public sector, excessive complexity, poor incentives and a lack of transparency’, Stiglitz says.

‘The Government plan in effect involves insuring almost all losses. Since the private investors are spared most losses, then they primarily ‘value’ their potential gains’.

• Professor William K. Black, 5th April 2009: In an interview on the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) Bill Moyers Journal, William K. Black, Professor of Economics and Law at the University of Missouri, alleged that American banks and credit agencies conspired to create a system in which so-called ‘liars’ loans’ could receive AAA ratings and zero oversight, amounting to a truly massive FRAUD at the epicentre of American finance. But worse still, claimed Dr Black, Timothy Geithner, President Barack Obama’s Secretary of the Treasury, is currently engaged in a cover-up to keep the truth of America’s insolvency from its citizens’.

We can’t be bothered right now to sock you all of Professor Black’s prognostications: but if you have time to track them down on the Internet, you may, uh, come across a good deal of ‘thinking’ that you’ll instantly ‘recognise’ from your very assiduous reading of these reports and, if you are a subscriber, from your study of our analyses in successive issues of International Currency Review.

• For all of the above, please see these reports and successive issues of our journals, passim.

HYPOCRISY AND CANT IN THE G-20 COMMUNIQUE
The G-20 Communiqué (5) recycled the phrase that has been repeatedly used by Prime Minister Brown and his beleaguered and somewhat baffled Chancellor of the Exchequer, Alastair Darling, namely that ‘we have today pledged to do WHATEVER IS NECESSARY’ to:

• Restore confidence, growth, and jobs [unspoken: that we have destroyed by permitting and indulging in Fraudulent Finance];

• Repair the financial system [unspoken: that we have destroyed ditto] to restore lending;

• Strengthen financial regulation [unspoken: in order to regain former control over what our own permissive behaviour allowed to get completely out of control] to rebuild trust [unspoken: which our wayward, wilful and reprobate Fraudulent Finance behaviour, corruption, lies and systematic deception may have permanently destroyed];

• Fund [unspoken: using stolen and diverted funds and money created from the illicit use of other people’s money such as that of The Queen, in defiance of the legal principle that ‘the money you make from your illicit use of my money is my money’] and reform [unspoken: which we have been talking and doing not a lot about for years] our international financial institutions to overcome this crisis [unspoken: of our own making] and prevent future ones [unspoken: that is to say, crises of our own making that run beyond our control, like this one];

• Promote global trade and investment [unspoken: because we realise that in our greed and in pursuit of our secret agendas, we have come close to destroying ‘our global economy’, ‘globalism’ and therefore our planned route towards The New Underworld Order] and reject protectionism [which would complete the process of destroying our One World model], to underpin prosperity [unspoken: by which we really mean ‘to put our globalist model back together again]; and:

• Build an inclusive [globalist cliché], green [globalist cliché implying the unproven ideology of global warming] and sustainable recovery [globalist cliché: the standard overuse of the weasel word ‘sustainable’ implies that ‘if we don’t do what we are ordering the ‘planet’ to do, humanity will perish – a lie based upon the fallacy that the earth’s resources are finite, which is not true. At the time of Christ, there would have been perhaps 50-100 million people on earth. There are now 6.5 billion; and we are all breathing].

CRUCIAL FISCAL UNDERTAKINGS IN PARAGRAPH SIX
The Communiqué is full of this familiar globalist language, embracing ideologically ‘uncontestable’ presumptions which mask crude propaganda that is not to be challenged by simple people like us.

However Paragraph 6 contained actual SUBSTANCE, even though its CONTENT was masked in G-20-‘speak’ – the OPERATIVE keyword here being FISCAL:

‘6. We are undertaking a concerted fiscal expansion, which will save or create millions of jobs which would otherwise have been destroyed, and that will, by the end of next year, amount to $5 trillion, raise output by 4 per cent, and accelerate the transition to a green economy. We are committed to deliver the scale of sustained fiscal effort necessary to restore growth’.

But if we just take the British situation, there is no scope for ‘fiscal stimulus’ (reducing taxes) at all: in fact, in deference to German policy which is being served by the behaviour of the Governor of the Bank of England, who presided over the mismanagement of a (deliberately?) failed gilt issue the other day, the Chancellor of the Exchequer has actually been talking about RAISING TAXES, i.e. producing a deflationary budget later this month WHICH WILL MAKE THE SITUATION VERY MUCH WORSE. This is EXACTLY in line with covert DVD strategy to decapitate the British economy.

• FACT: In line with their slogan ‘For us the war never ended’, German (Nazi) strategists consider all economic policy to represent a pretext for economic warfare.

So what does Paragraph 6 mean by FISCAL?

The G-7-Approved private sector Refunding Programme of transparent trades yielding TAXABLE REVENUE to reliquefy the banks ON THE BOOKS, is the ONLY means whereby FISCAL STIMULUS can be delivered in the prevailing circumstances.

• FACT: The $5.0 trillion mentioned in Paragraph 6 refers to the tax that will have been raised on the books from the proceeds of the private sector Refunding Programme by the end of 2010.

By contrast, ‘Geithnerism’ – the son of ‘Paulsonism’ – involving the reckless, open-ended creation of Treasury debt in the background, creates no revenue at all, since by definition the public sector generates debt whereas it is ONLY the private sector that can generate TAXABLE REVENUE.

Therefore, it is clear that Paragraph 6 refers to the intended transparent private sector Refunding Programme, which, as this service has repeatedly sought to explain, both in these reports and in our printed subscription services, provides the SOLUTION to the crisis.

Indeed, the crisis would never have reached ‘train wreck’ status if this solution had been applied as soon as it had been approved by the Group of Seven financial powers in 2007. Instead of which, the criminal Paulson-Bush Jr. Treasury chose, as the Obama Treasury has also done, the corrupt off-balance sheet method – in a display of wanton arrogance and stupidity that defies belief, since the owners of the brains in question have more than enough ‘smarts’ between them to have been able to discern the correct way forward.

But crude self-enrichment and financing The New Underworld Order remained the priority, with the disastrous consequences that we predicted on 2nd September 2006 and again in December that year, and in our ‘train wreck’ reports in the summer of 2007: a disgraceful and disgusting display of opinionated, reprobate US official misbehaviour that cannot be expunged from the record (even though the ‘mainstream’ media is doing its best here) given that International Currency Review is resident all over the world, as a witness to these deliberate, criminal abominations.

THE PRIVATE MEETING BETWEEN THE QUEEN AND PRESIDENT OBAMA
Which brings us to what may have been said during the prolonged private meeting between the Queen and President Obama on 1st April 2009. After hastily trying to expunge the insults heaped upon the British during Mr Brown’s earlier visit to Washington, as we have described, President Obama’s minders stood on their heads and started promulgating the opposite message, namely that the ‘Special Relationship’ (so comprehensively mangled by criminalised American Administrations) is greatly to be valued, while our head of State is a jewel without compare (true).

Even so, President Obama arrived under a cloud, as implied by our ‘interview’ between The Queen and the President (see reports from 26th to 31st March 2009 – this text being so close to the reality that certain forces had it ‘snipped’ from our original report).

Now self-evidently, there would have been no flies on any wall inside Buckingham Palace. But even if a microphone had been installed within a picture frame above the Royal mantlepiece, no part of this supremely important private conversation could possibly, under any circumstances, have been leaked, and certainly not to the Editor of this service. That said, close observation left no doubt at all that The Queen deployed her unparalleled skills developed over 57 years of loyal service to place the young President at his ease, and then to persuade him that cooperation rather than confrontation would reap magnificent benefits for both parties, and for the whole world.

Since on-the-books private sector refunding using transparent, fully taxed trading operations yielding TAXABLE REVENUE in spades is the ONLY solution to the shambles created by the Bush-Paulson-Cheney criminal Administration, and exacerbated by the decisions taken under Geithner, and since transparent refunding will finance President Obama’s entire ambitious programme, with money to spare, it would appear that the Queen did not need to over-emphasise what the very intelligent President Barack Obama could certainly now see immediately for himself.

The unanswered question is whether his advisers, all of whom are linked to the Clinton Criminal Compartment of the CIA, had obfuscated this obvious solution or withheld any review of it from his attention – begging the further unanswered question as to whether President Obama was himself complicit in ignoring the G-7-Approved private sector Refunding Programme, or not.

But, as explained in the final brief update to our report dated 31st March, this is now, if the above assessment is correct, ‘water under the bridge’. What matters is that The Queen has diplomatically charmed and ‘turned’ President Obama in the interests of BOTH parties, and ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’. In the event that the Refunding Programme is sabotaged, then we would join those who proclaim that we are all doomed: but the indications are that it is to proceed.

SUDDEN CHANGE OF LANGUAGE AT THE FED
Open domain indications that A GENUINE DISCONTINUITY occurred as a specific consequence of the successful meeting between The Queen and President Obama are oblique, but telling. We can start with smoke signals from the Federal Reserve which – significantly – began almost immediately after the G-20 theatrical display, and which represented a precise REVERSAL of what the Federal Reserve had been saying PRIOR to that date. To wit:

• Bloomberg, 3rd April 2009: ‘Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said the central bank must retain the flexibility to withdraw its record injection of credit into the economy to keep inflation in check when the crisis abates’.

‘The central bank’s emergency ‘activities must not constrain the exercise of monetary policy as needed to meet our Congressional mandate to foster maximum sustainable employment and stable prices’, Bernanke said in a speech in Charlotte, North Carolina’.

‘The US central bank has effectively printed money to buy or lend against a range of assets [sic – Ed.] to alleviate the credit crunch and revive the economy. Bernanke’s speech today detailed steps that the Fed can take to remove that liquidity’.

• Bloomberg, 4th April: ‘The Federal Reserve’s two top officials assured that they will pull back their emergency credit programs once the crisis fades, even as they prepare to flood the system further with in excess of $1.0 trillion’.

‘Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said yesterday in Charlotte, North Carolina, that the Fed must retain the flexibility to withdraw its record cash injections to restrain prices. Vice Chairman Donald Kohn said in Wooster, Ohio, ‘the trick will be unwinding this balance sheet in a timely way to avoid inflation’.

‘We can’t go into this without knowing how we are going to get out again’, Kohn, 66, who’s worked for the Fed almost four decades, said in response to a question after a speech at the College of Wooster, where he received a bachelor’s degree in economics’.

FED PUSH FOR EXEMPTION FROM STATUTORY DEBT CEILING
In the course of his comments in Ohio, Kohn also lifted the lid on ANOTHER debt-building operation which may be in the pipeline, thereby reconfirming what a dreadful mess the Federal Reserve and the Treasury find themselves in as a consequence of their participation in and accommodation of this Fraudulent Finance orgy that came to a juddering halt in September 2008.

According to Bloomberg:

‘Kohn said the Fed and Treasury are seeking ‘other tools’ from Congress to help mop up excess cash. One possibility is that the Fed issue its own securities, or ‘Fed bills’, or the Treasury could issue special bills, and put the cash on deposit at the Fed’.

‘“It is important to get either of those tools EXEMPT FROM THE DEBT CEILING so that the Fed could have the power to absorb all the reserves it wanted to”, Kohn said’.

This, of course, would destroy the residual purpose of the Statutory Debt Ceiling, which is all that remains of Congress’s power to curb excessive borrowing by the Government.

In other words, to get out of its ghastly bind, the Federal Reserve is now pushing for a breach in the Statutory Debt Ceiling, which the Congress traditionally guards like a hawk – since if it were to be discarded or eroded, the Legislative Branch would be unable to exercise any constraint at all on the permissive borrowing of the Executive Branch.

FED NOW LESS CONCERNED ABOUT DEBT BECAUSE OF REFUNDING?
Now we have a choice here: we can speculate that this represents just the latest in a long line of demands by the Federal Reserve for the Legislature to furnish it with ‘whatever is necessary’ to enable it to overcome the calamity brought about by the fact that its previous Chairman, Dr Alan Greenspan, was DVD chieftain George H. W. Bush’s chief trader while also serving as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board; or we can speculate that, post-2nd April 2009, the Federal Reserve may be less concerned (assuming it ever was) about the Treasury’s colossal trash debt burden, given that it has had to recognise that the transparent private sector Refunding Programme generating windfall TAXABLE REVENUE is to go ahead from London, following the private meeting between The Queen and President Obama, so that there is nothing the Fed can do about it.

It is difficult to imagine how the Federal Reserve could possibly contemplate a full-frontal attack on Congress’s sacred Statutory Debt Limit if this were not the case.

As background, it is also a fact that private commentators are starting to deploy language that we have used for a long time in our reports. For instance, the US commentator Sean Brodrick stated on 1st April 2009 that bankers are financial terrorists and should be indicted. Thank you very much. Some of them may now be shot on sight: see above.

THE POST-G-20 CIA ‘COLLAPSING’ OPERATION
Beyond that, the following incredible state of affairs became apparent AFTER the conclusion of the overhyped G-20 theatrical display. What follows will stagger many people, no doubt.

Since we were double-crossed (see relevant reports dated 3rd and 18th March 2008), against the background of the de facto stealing of the Editor’s $35,000 private loan repayable with interest after two years on 11th June 2007, the Editor naturally severed relations with Mr Wanta. However on 24th March 2009, we received a copy of an email despatched by Wanta and addressed to an extended (revealed) list of media types, and to Attorney General Eric Holder, Lawrence Summers, Mr Paul A. Volcker, the Inspector General of the Federal Reserve, First Lady Michelle Obama, Valerie Jarrett, New York State Governor David A Patterson, Vice President Joseph Biden, US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, US Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, GAOFRAUDNET, the Joint Committee on Foreign Affairs, US Securities and Exchange Commission Enforcement Investigations, US Army Inspector General Green, US President Barack H. Obama and others, reading as follows:

Date: Tuesday, March 24, 2009, 11:51 am:
On advice of legal counsel, we will immediately seek treble damages from the US Department of the Treasury, et al, for lawless conversion of US Dollars 4.5 trillion plus daily interest accruals, and for denying me the lawful opportunity to pay my civil/repatriation income tax payment of US Dollars 1.575 trillion directly to our US Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Washington DC, USA, among other continuing incidents to be documented with extensive exhibits/documentation’.

President Obama… Thank you for trying, but it appears that our mutual attempt to cooperate and readily assist in the economic difficult times have fallen on deaf ears.

Thank you for your kind assistance.

Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta to the United Nations/USA/PRC/Republic of Singapore/State of Israel, Jerusalem.

Principality Central Bank Chairman.

Principality Trade Commissioner.

IT IS TIME………………“Never Let the Magic Dim”.

• Note: The ‘principality’ in question is a ‘micro-state’ in the Sydney, Australia, area calling itself The Principality of Snake Hill. The establishment of actual or ‘virtual’ micro-states (some of which are supposedly recognised by the United Nations) is a cynical operation of the globalist One World manipulators designed to hasten the fragmentation of the integrity of nation states. For instance, such a ‘micro-state’ exists inside the Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) complex outside Moscow.

We make no further comment on the above, and proceed now to two further comparably extraordinary developments.

On 3rd April, THE VERY DAY AFTER THE G-20 MEETING, Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., received a telephone call from the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Taxation asking him for filing and tax documentation in respect of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., Wanta’s corporation.

However it may be recalled that on 23rd March 2008, Wanta fired Michael Cottrell from his positions as Treasurer and Executive Vice President of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., by issuing and promulgating a three-page document called ‘Resolution of the Sole Shareholder’, whereas of course corporate resolutions are universally required to be Resolutions of the Board of Directors.

Equipped with this document, Mr Cottrell obtained the necessary forms from the Commonwealth of Virginia authorities and proceeded, with relief and at once, to file the necessary formal notices of his (irregular) ‘dismissal’ and his RESIGNATION dated 23rd March 2008 [see above] with the State tax authorities in Richmond, Commonwealth of Virginia.

But natürlich, on 3rd April 2009 the Virginia State authorities claimed, didn’t they, that they had no knowledge of that filing. Within half an hour, Michael Cottrell was of course able to fax copies of the documents that were filed with Virginia on 31st March 2008. Those papers necessarily stated that since Mr Cottrell was no longer Executive Vice President and Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., as of 23rd March 2008, all future enquiries and communications should be addressed to Mr Wanta at an address in the State of Wisconsin.

Again, bear in mind that this sudden interest on the part of the Virginia tax authorities surfaced IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE CLOSURE OF THE G-20 MEETING IN THE LONDON AREA.

Thirdly, we were informed, AGAIN on 3rd April 2009, by a knowledgeable US official source, that the State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue is to commence legal proceedings or has commenced legal proceedings to sue Bank of America, Richmond, for $4.5 trillion! See our Wantagate Petition for a Writ of Mandamus reports from June 2007 onwards, for background.

Now you may recall from our report dated 6th August 2007 that we have long since proved, with the assistance of documents (reproduced in International Currency Review) that the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue engaged in criminal conduct in charging Wanta THREE TIMES for State tax amounting to $14,129.00, which was paid twice, in May and then in June 1992, and a third time on 21st July 2005 using the Editor’s private LOAN funds. We also identified other respects in which criminal conduct by that Department was demonstrated.

The Editor attempted to assist Mr Wanta by asking the Wisconsin Court whether it would issue, following the ending of his probation as a consequence of the Editor’s payment effective 14th November 2005, the appropriate document recognising the restitution, but made no progress. Finally, on 17th October 2007, the Editor terminated this assistance by writing a Misprision of Felony letter to the relevant Judge in Wisconsin, drawing the Judge’s attention yet again to the matters displayed in our report dated 6th August 2007. All this information has been in the public domain in our financial journal and on this website for a very prolonged period of time.

We can comment no further on the specifics identified above. But what we CAN do, is draw your attention, finally, to the following considerations:

• As indicated, the telephone call from the Commonwealth of Virginia tax authorities and news of the Wisconsin Department of Revenue’s reported lawsuit against Bank of America BOTH occurred on 3rd April 2009, one day after the G-20 meeting.

• This clearly tends to support our assessment that A DECISIVE DISCONTINUITY amounting to ‘a resolution’ of key issues coincided with the G-20 event, arising from the meeting between The Queen and President Obama – ‘necessitating’ a CIA-contrived ‘collapsing’ operation (see below), (leaving aside the separate fact that Chancellor Merkel is reported, post-G-20, to be sabotaging the releases, as discussed above).

It could possibly be argued that the timing of the telephone call and the lawsuit information were both consequent specifically upon the issuance of Wanta’s notice of RICO action against the US Treasury; but in the overall G-20 context, that seems unlikely.

• The suing and cross-suing identified above represents a classic CIA IMPLOSION OPERATION, the overall purpose of which may well be to BURY this matter in a ‘Black’ avalanche of deliberately contrived confusion. It is associated with a parallel escalation of provocatively convoluted website confusion designed to intensify the impenetrable fog of disinformation, diversion, redirection and deception, with everyone portrayed to be fighting everyone else, and all at each other’s throats (a well-known cynical intelligence community obfuscation technique).

The intention of the lawsuits may be to ‘disappear’ the funds that have long since been stolen or diverted in a fog of cross-litigation lasting for years, with the prospect that cases will be dismissed and the entire matter wound up by process of exhaustion. Was this pre-planned? Of course it was.

• And was the advice given to Wanta to embark upon a RICO action ‘poisonous’ advice from a CIA lawyer? You decide.

The $6.2 trillion, of course, is not connected in any way with the foregoing, and was withdrawn as previously reported by this service, on 29th January 2009.

Notes:

(1) The verb ‘to thaumatrope’: to bombard captive audiences with endless verbiage without regard for those forced to put up with this offensive, such that the thaumatroper is engaged in a verbal assault from which the audience cannot escape.

(2) Base allegations that the Editor is ‘anti-French’ or ‘anti-German’ represent the concoctions of diminished minds. The Editor has visited France all his life, speaks French and has close friends in France. He studied singing in Vienna and travelled extensively in Germany in younger days, and listens non-stop to German classical music. We are addressing the evils of Governments and of the globalist usurpers, not of the abused peoples they are supposed to be serving.

(3) See the Editor’s book The New Underworld Order, Chapter Ten: ‘The Thousand-Year Reich’, available from the Edward Harle Limited (intelligence books) section of this combined website.

(4) During dinner in a Tarrytown, NY, restaurant the other day, the Editor’s guest asked what proportion of the perpetrators of these financial crimes are of Jewish extraction, to which the Editor responded: ‘100%’ (not quite true, as Stanford isn’t Jewish: but he’s an exception).

A few days later, an American Jewish contact in London made the unsolicited pertinent point to the Editor that ordinary people of Jewish extraction are getting extremely concerned at what has been happening because, as he put it, ‘they don’t want to be the scapegoats again’. This point was also raised several years ago by a Jewish leader in New York, who warned that if the Jewish community did not take care, there might be a ‘repeat performance’: and this was long before most people had heard of Bernard L. Madoff. The Education Director of a US School and Synagogue who is a friend of the Editor was asked some years ago (by the Editor) what his community’s attitude was towards these Jewish criminals who give the community such a bad name. He responded: ‘These people are a grave and continuing worry to our community. It is a very serious problem’.

These observations should ‘pacify’ anyone of diminished mental capacity who may deduce that our use of the taboo word ‘Jewish’ has any implications whatsoever beyond stating facts as they are, rather than in conformity with mind-controlled ‘political correctness’. Finally, the Editor’s Jewish friends on both sides of the Atlantic openly share this assessment.

(5) The full text of the Group of Twenty Communiqué issued from the London Summit on 2nd April 2009, is appended here for the record:

1. We, the Leaders of the Group of Twenty, met in London on 2 April 2009.

2. We face the greatest challenge to the world economy in modern times; a crisis which has deepened since we last met, which affects the lives of women, men, and children in every country, and which all countries must join together to resolve. A global crisis requires a global solution.

3. We start from the belief that prosperity is indivisible; that growth, to be sustained, has to be shared; and that our global plan for recovery must have at its heart the needs and jobs of hard-working families, not just in developed countries but in emerging markets and the poorest countries of the world too; and must reflect the interests, not just of today’s population, but of future generations too. We believe that the only sure foundation for sustainable globalisation and rising prosperity for all is an open world economy based on market principles, effective regulation, and strong global institutions.

4. We have today therefore pledged to do whatever is necessary to:
• Restore confidence, growth, and jobs;
• Repair the financial system to restore lending;
• Strengthen financial regulation to rebuild trust;
• Fund and reform our international financial institutions to overcome this crisis and prevent future ones;
• Promote global trade and investment and reject protectionism, to underpin prosperity; and
• Build an inclusive, green, and sustainable recovery.

By acting together to fulfil these pledges we will bring the world economy out of recession and prevent a crisis like this from recurring in the future.

5. The agreements we have reached today, to treble resources available to the IMF to $750 billion, to support a new SDR allocation of $250 billion, to support at least $100 billion of additional lending by the MDBs, to ensure $250 billion worth of support for trade finance, and to use the additional resources from agreed International Monetary Fund gold sales for concessional finance for the poorest countries, constitute an additional $1.1 trillion programme of support to restore credit, growth and jobs in the world economy. Together with the measures we have each taken nationally, this constitutes a global plan for recovery on an unprecedented scale.

Restoring growth and jobs:

6. We are undertaking an unprecedented and concerted fiscal expansion, which will save or create millions of jobs which would otherwise have been destroyed, and that will, by the end of next year, amount to $5 trillion, raise output by 4 per cent, and accelerate the transition to a green economy. We are committed to deliver the scale of sustained fiscal effort necessary to restore growth.

7. Our central banks have also taken exceptional action. Interest rates have been cut aggressively in most countries, and our central banks have pledged to maintain expansionary policies for as long as needed and to use the full range of monetary policy instruments, including unconventional instruments, consistent with price stability.

8. Our actions to restore growth cannot be effective until we restore domestic lending and international capital flows. We have provided significant and comprehensive support to our banking systems to provide liquidity, recapitalise financial institutions, and address decisively the problem of impaired assets. We are committed to take all necessary actions to restore the normal flow of credit through the financial system and ensure the soundness of systemically important institutions, implementing our policies in line with the agreed G-20 framework for restoring lending and repairing the financial sector.

9. Taken together, these actions will constitute the largest fiscal and monetary stimulus and the most comprehensive support programme for the financial sector in modern times. Acting together strengthens the impact and the exceptional policy actions announced so far must be implemented without delay. Today, we have further agreed over $1 trillion of additional resources for the world economy through our international financial institutions and trade finance.

10. Last month the IMF estimated that world growth in real terms would resume and rise to over two percent by the end of 2010. We are confident that the actions we have agreed today, and our unshakeable commitment to work together to restore growth and jobs, while preserving long-term fiscal sustainability, will accelerate the return to trend growth. We commit today to taking whatever action is necessary to secure that outcome, and we call on the IMF to assess regularly the actions taken and the global actions required.

11. We are resolved to ensure long-term fiscal sustainability and price stability and will put in place credible exit strategies from the measures that need to be taken now so as to support the financial sector and restore global demand. We are convinced that by implementing our agreed policies we will limit the longer-term costs to our economies, thereby reducing the scale of the fiscal consolidation necessary over the longer term.

12. We will conduct all our economic policies cooperatively and responsibly with regard to the impact on other countries and will refrain from competitive devaluation of our currencies and promote a stable and well-functioning international monetary system. We will support, now and in the future, to candid, even-handed, and independent IMF surveillance of our economies and financial sectors, of the impact of our policies on others, and of risks facing the global economy.

Strengthening financial supervision and regulation:

13. Major failures in the financial sector and in financial regulation and supervision were fundamental causes of the crisis. Confidence will not be restored until we rebuild trust in our financial system. We will take action to build a stronger, more globally consistent, supervisory and regulatory framework for the future financial sector, which will support sustainable global growth and serve the needs of business and citizens.

14. We each agree to ensure our domestic regulatory systems are strong. But we also agree to establish the much greater consistency and systematic cooperation between countries, and the framework of internationally agreed high standards, that a global financial system requires.

Strengthened regulation and supervision must promote propriety, integrity and transparency; guard against risk across the financial system; must dampen rather than amplify the financial and economic cycle; reduce reliance on inappropriately risky sources of financing; and discourage excessive risk-taking. Regulators and supervisors must protect consumers and investors, support market discipline, avoid adverse impacts on other countries, reduce the scope for regulatory arbitrage, support competition and dynamism, and keep pace with innovation in the marketplace.

15. To this end we are implementing the Action Plan agreed at our last meeting, as set out in the attached progress report. We have today also issued a Declaration, Strengthening the Financial System. In particular we agree:

• To establish a new Financial Stability Board (FSB) with a strengthened mandate, as a successor to the Financial Stability Forum (FSF), including all G-20 countries, FSF members, Spain, and the European Commission;

• That the FSB should collaborate with the IMF to provide early warning of macroeconomic and financial risks and the actions needed to address them;

• To reshape our regulatory systems so that our authorities are able to identify and take account of macro-prudential risks;

• To extend regulation and oversight to all systemically important financial institutions, instruments and markets. This will include, for the first time, systemically important hedge funds;

• To endorse and implement the FSF’s tough new principles on pay and compensation and to support sustainable compensation schemes and the corporate social responsibility of all firms;

• To take action, once recovery is assured, to improve the quality, quantity, and international consistency of capital in the banking system. In future, regulation must prevent excessive leverage and require buffers of resources to be built up in good times;

• To take action against non-cooperative jurisdictions, including tax havens. We stand ready to deploy sanctions to protect our public finances and financial systems. The era of banking secrecy is over. We note that the OECD has today published a list of countries assessed by the Global Forum against the international standard for exchange of tax information;

• To call on the accounting standard setters to work urgently with supervisors and regulators to improve standards on valuation and provisioning and achieve a single set of high-quality global accounting standards; and:

• To extend regulatory oversight and registration to Credit Rating Agencies to ensure they meet the international code of good practice, particularly to prevent unacceptable conflicts of interest.

16. We instruct our Finance Ministers to complete the implementation of these decisions in line with the timetable set out in the Action Plan. We have requested the FSB and the IMF to monitor progress, working with the Financial Action Taskforce and other relevant bodies, and to provide a report to the next meeting of our Finance Ministers in Scotland in November.

Strengthening our global financial institutions :

17. Emerging markets and developing countries, which have been the engine of recent world growth, are also now facing challenges which are adding to the current downturn in the global economy. It is imperative for global confidence and economic recovery that capital continues to flow to them. This will require a substantial strengthening of the international financial institutions, particularly the IMF. We have therefore agreed today to make available an additional $850 billion of resources through the global financial institutions to support growth in emerging market and developing countries by helping to finance counter-cyclical spending, bank recapitalisation, infrastructure, trade finance, balance of payments support, debt rollover, and social support.

To this end:

• We have agreed to increase the resources available to the IMF through immediate financing from members of $250 billion, subsequently incorporated into an expanded and more flexible New Arrangements to Borrow, increased by up to $500 billion, and to consider market borrowing if necessary; and:

• We support a substantial increase in lending of at least 100 billion dollars by the Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs), including to low income countries, and [will] ensure that all MDBs have the appropriate capital [Text unclear here].

18. It is essential that these resources can be used effectively and flexibly to support growth. We welcome in this respect the progress made by the IMF with its new Flexible Credit Line (FCL) and its reformed lending and conditionality framework which will enable the IMF to ensure that its facilities address effectively the underlying causes of countries’ balance of payments financing needs, particularly the withdrawal of external capital flows to the banking and corporate sectors.

We support Mexico’s decision to seek an FCL arrangement.

19. We have agreed to support a general SDR allocation which will inject $250 billion into the world economy and increase global liquidity, and urgent ratification of the Fourth Amendment.

20. In order for our financial institutions to help manage the crisis and prevent future crises we must strengthen their longer term relevance, effectiveness and legitimacy. So alongside the significant increase in resources agreed today we are determined to reform and modernise the international financial institutions to ensure they can assist members and shareholders effectively in the new challenges they face. We will reform their mandates, scope and governance to reflect changes in the world economy and the new challenges of globalisation, and that emerging and developing economies, including the poorest, must have greater voice and representation. This must be accompanied by action to increase the credibility and accountability of the institutions through better strategic oversight and decision making.

To this end:

• We commit to implementing the package of IMF quota and voice reforms agreed in April 2008 and call on the IMF to complete the next review of quotas by January 2011;

• We agree that, alongside this, consideration should be given to greater involvement of the Fund’s Governors in providing strategic direction to the IMF and increasing its accountability;

• We commit to implementing the World Bank reforms agreed in October 2008. We further look forward to further recommendations, at the next meetings, on voice and representation reforms on an accelerated timescale, to be agreed by the 2010 Spring Meetings;

• We agree that the heads and senior leadership of the international financial institutions should be appointed through an open, transparent, and merit-based selection process; and:

• Building on the current reviews of the IMF and World Bank we asked the Chairman, working with the G-20 Finance Ministers, to consult widely in an inclusive process and report back to the next meeting with proposals for further reforms to improve responsiveness and adaptability of the IFIs.

21. In addition to reforming our international financial institutions for the new challenges of globalisation we agreed on the desirability of a new global consensus on the key values and principles that will promote sustainable economic activity. We support discussion on such a charter for sustainable economic activity with a view to further discussion at our next meeting.

We take note of the work started in other fora in this regard and look forward to further discussion of this charter for sustainable economic activity.

Resisting protectionism and promoting global trade and investment:

22. World trade growth has underpinned rising prosperity for half a century. But it is now falling for the first time in 25 years. Falling demand is exacerbated by growing protectionist pressures and a withdrawal of trade credit. Reinvigorating world trade and investment is essential for restoring global growth. We will not repeat the historic mistakes of protectionism of previous eras.

To this end:

• We reaffirm the commitment made in Washington: to refrain from raising new barriers to investment or to trade in goods and services, imposing new export restrictions, or implementing World Trade Organisation (WTO) inconsistent measures to stimulate exports. In addition we will rectify promptly any such measures. We extend this pledge to the end of 2010;

• We will minimise any negative impact on trade and investment of our domestic policy actions including fiscal policy and action in support of the financial sector. We will not retreat into financial protectionism, particularly measures that constrain worldwide capital flows, especially to developing countries;

• We will notify promptly the WTO of any such measures and we call on the WTO, together with other international bodies, within their respective mandates, to monitor and report publicly on our adherence to these undertakings on a quarterly basis;

• We will take, at the same time, whatever steps we can to promote and facilitate trade and investment; and:

• We will ensure availability of at least $250 billion over the next two years to support trade finance through our export credit and investment agencies and through the MDBs.

We ask our regulators to make use of available flexibility in capital requirements for trade finance.

23. We remain committed to reaching an ambitious and balanced conclusion to the Doha Development Round, which is urgently needed. This could boost the global economy by at least $150 billion per annum. To achieve this we are committed to building on the progress already made, including with regard to modalities.

24. We will give renewed focus and political attention to this critical issue in the coming period and will use our continuing work and all international meetings that are relevant to drive progress.

Ensuring a fair and sustainable recovery for all:

25. We are determined not only to restore economic growth but to lay the foundation for a fair and sustainable world economy. We recognise that the current crisis has a disproportionate impact on the vulnerable in the poorest countries and recognise our collective responsibility to mitigate the social impact of the crisis to minimise long-lasting damage to global potential.

To this end:

• We reaffirm our historic commitment to meeting the Millennium Development Goals and to achieving our respective ODA pledges, including commitments on Aid for Trade, debt relief, and the Gleneagles commitments, especially to sub-Saharan Africa;

• The actions and decisions we have taken today will provide $50 billion to support social protection, boost trade and safeguard development in low income countries, as part of the significant increase in crisis support for these and other developing countries/ emerging markets;

• We are making available resources for social protection for the poorest countries, including through investing in long-term food security and through voluntary bilateral contributions to the World Bank’s Vulnerability Framework, including the Infrastructure Crisis Facility, and the Rapid Social Response Fund;

• We have committed, consistently with the new income model, that additional resources from agreed sales of IMF gold will be used, together with surplus income, to provide $6 billion additional concessional and flexible finance for the poorest countries over the next 2 to 3 years. We call on the IMF to come forward with concrete proposals at the Spring Meetings;

• We have agreed to review the flexibility of the Debt Sustainability Framework and call on the IMF and World Bank to report to the IMFC and Development Committee at the Annual Meetings; and

• We call on the UN, working with other global institutions, to establish an effective mechanism to monitor the impact of the crisis on the poorest and most vulnerable.

26. We recognise the human dimension to the crisis. We commit to support those affected by the crisis by creating employment opportunities and through income support measures. We will build a fair and family-friendly labour market for both women and men.

We therefore welcome the reports of the London Jobs Conference and the Rome Social Summit and the key principles they proposed. We will support employment by stimulating growth, investing in education and training, and through active labour market policies, focusing on those who are most vulnerable. We call upon the ILO, working with other relevant organisations, to assess the actions taken and those required for the future.

27. We agreed to make the best possible use of investment funded by fiscal stimulus programmes towards the goal of building a resilient, sustainable, and green recovery.

We will make the transition towards clean, innovative, resource efficient, low carbon technologies and infrastructure. We encourage the MDBs to contribute fully to the achievement of this stated objective. We will identify and work together on further measures to build sustainable economies.

28. We reaffirm our commitment to address the threat of irreversible climate change, based on the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities, and to reach agreement at the UN Climate Change conference in Copenhagen in December 2009.

Delivering our commitments:

29. We have committed ourselves to work together with urgency and determination to translate these words into action. We agreed to meet again before the end of this year to review progress on our commitments (6).

(6) Tax Information Exchange Agreements (TIEAS) are based on a model OECD agreement on the exchange of information on tax matters, developed by the OECD Global Forum Working Group on Effective Exchange of Information. The purpose of this Agreement is to promote international co-operation in tax matters through the exchange of information. It was developed by the OECD’s Global Forum Working Group on Effective Exchange of Information (“the Working Group”). The Working Group consisted of representatives from OECD Member countries as well as delegates from Aruba, Bermuda, Bahrain, Cayman Islands, Cyprus, The Isle of Man, Malta, Mauritius, the Netherlands Antilles, the Seychelles and San Marino (the Italian mafia’s de facto jurisdiction).
The Agreement grew out of the work undertaken by the OECD to address harmful tax practices.

The lack of effective exchange of information is one of the primary criteria used in determining harmful tax practices. The mandate of the Working Group was to develop a legal instrument that could be used to establish effective exchange of information. The Agreement represents the standard of effective exchange of information for the purposes of the OECD’s initiative on harmful tax practices. This Agreement text, which was released by the OECD in April 2002, is not a binding instrument but contains two models for bilateral agreements. A number of bilateral agreements have been based on this Agreement.

Recent bilateral Tax Information Exchange Agreements (TIEAS) monitored by this service include:

• Antigua & Barbuda – Australia, 30 January 2007
• Antigua & Barbuda – United States, 06 December 2000
• Antigua & Barbuda – Australia, 30 January 2007
• Antigua & Barbuda – United States, 06 December 2000
• Aruba – United States, 21 November 2003
• Australia – Bermuda, 15 November 2005
• Australia – British Virgin Islands, 27 October 2008
• Australia – Isle of Man, 29 January 2009
• Australia – Netherlands Antilles, 01 March 2007
• Bahamas – United States, 25 January 2002
• Bermuda – United Kingdom, 4 December 2007
• British Virgin Islands – United States, 03 April 2002
• Cayman Islands – United States, 27 November 2001
• Denmark – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Denmark – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Denmark – Isle of Man, 30 October 2007
• Denmark – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• Faroes – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Faroes – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Faroes – Isle of Man, 30 October 2007
• Faroes – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• Finland – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Finland – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Finland – Isle of Man, 30 October 2007
• Finland – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• France – Guernsey, 24 March 2009
• France – Isle of Man, 26 March 2009
• France – Jersey, 23 March 2009
• Germany – Guernsey, 26 March 2009
• Germany – Isle of Man, 02 March 2009
• Greenland – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Greenland – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Greenland – Isle of Man, 30 October 2007
• Greenland – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• Guernsey – Netherlands, 25 April 2008
• Iceland – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Iceland – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Iceland – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• Ireland – Guernsey, 26 March 2009
• Ireland – Jersey, 26 March 2009
• Isle of Man – Ireland, 24 April 2008
• Isle of Man – Netherlands, 12 October 2005
• Isle of Man – Norway, 30 October 2007
• Isle of Man – Sweden, 30 October 2007
• Isle of Man – United Kindom, 29 September 2008
• Isle of Man – United States, 02 October 2002
• Jersey – Germany, 4 July 2008
• Jersey – Netherlands, 20 June 2007
• Jersey – United States, 04 November 2002
• Netherlands Antilles – New Zealand, 01 March 2007
• Netherlands Antilles – Spain, 10 June 2008
• Netherlands Antilles – United States, 17 April 2002
• Norway – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Norway – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Norway – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• Sweden – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Sweden – Guernsy, 28 October 2008
• Sweden – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• United Kingdom – British Virgin Islands, 29 October 2008
• United Kingdom – Guernsey, 20 January 2009
• United Kingdom – Jersey, 10 March 2009
• United States – Liechtenstein, 8 December 2008
• United States – Gibraltar, 31 March 2009

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. Some versions have a ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

CATASTROPHIC BANKERS’ RAMP TO CONTINUE UNDER OBAMA

SMALL PROBLEM: THE MARKET AND THE WORLD AREN’T BUYING IT

Sunday 15 February 2009 04:00

UPDATE 25th February: Note from the Editor: Would the party who emailed me last year with outline details of $25,000 that Wanta accepted from him and never repaid, please email the Editor as soon as possible, with ‘further and better particulars’? We do have the original email, but it is in another location, and the Editor could usefully apply this information now: cstory@worldreports.org.

See new update for 23rd February: ‘EU ELITE FEASTS WHILE THE WORLD CRUMBLES’ below…

See new update for 20th February: ‘STANFORD TOOK OVER FROM NORIEGA’, below this update…

IF THE BLIND LEAD THE BLIND, BOTH SHALL FALL INTO THE DITCH (1)

• UPDATE 19TH FEBRUARY 2009:
AND LO! THEY ARE FALLING INTO THE DITCH ‘AS WE SPEAK’:
Specifically, on 18th February, the cost of insuring a $10 million US Treasury instrument for a five-year maturity reached $90,000. On 19th February, the cost had risen to $93,000! In a normal market, the cost should not exceed $10,000, at the most.

• SO, the more they write, the more junk the US Treasury creates, the higher the price. It’s been doing this more or less constantly since Obama took office, by the way.

This data, publicised by CNBC and derived from CME ‘pit’ sources, tells you that the market is 100% in agreement with the assessment elaborated upon below. Confidence in US Treasury instruments is collapsing, as a consequence of the fact that not all financial market participants and observers are as mentally deficient as the corrupt technicians who are taking Barack Obama and the United States’ financial economy to the cleaners.

What they thought they could get away with is a giga-TARP operation, involving circular financing which only delivers vast mountains of new garbage Treasury debt in the background: and we are talking about TRILLIONS here. We therefore CONFIRM that the disastrous course adopted by the financial sorcerers surrounding President Obama WILL lead this Adminstration, the US dollar and the US and world financial economies into a BRICK WALL, and that the deterioration of which the above-mentioned price is a potent symptom will be RAPID, taking the whole world by surprise.

When this materialises, kindly remember the following, would you? The catastrophe is specifically and EXCLUSIVELY a consequence of the determination of these Fraudulent Finance specialists to CONTINUE with their exotic, illicit financial Ponzi operations, LONG AFTER THE REST OF THE WORLD HAS SEEN RIGHT THROUGH THEIR DUPLICITY. So, fasten your seatbelts: these US idiots made their choice, hoping to cover up their complicity in the Banker’s Ramp. Now they will finally discover that by wilfully refusing to ‘go straight’ with on-the-books financing as agreed ages ago by the Group of Seven, they will reap the whirlwind. And so, unfortunately, will the Rest of Us.

THE BLIND FOOLS HAVE BROUGHT THIS PREDICTED CATASTROPHE UPON THEMSELVES

• UPDATE, 20TH FEBRUARY 2009: STANFORD TOOK OVER FROM NORIEGA:
In extensive coverage of the Stanford scandal today, The Daily Telegraph states: ‘As ‘Sir’ Allen’s financial empire unravelled, depositors across the Caribbean and South America besieged banks that he controlled in Antigua, Venezuela, Ecuador, Colombia, Peru and Panama’: which HAPPEN of course to be the primary locations of the Bush-CIA drug empire. On making further enquiries, the Editor has just been informed that quote ‘Stanford took over from Noriega’ unquote.

Stanford’s offices in Houston are in the Galleria complex where Carlyle’s offices are located.

And WHERE was Stanford ‘picked up’? Uh, in Fredericksburg, Virginia, deep inside intelligence communitysville. Who would want to GO THERE when ostensibly on the run from law enforcement?

Only a high-level drug-running Central Intelligence Agency operative in trouble who needed to be debriefed in a hurry and told what steps to take to PROTECT THE AGENCY from exposure, right?

On 1st November 2008, according to Mr Wayne Madsen’s service, the Spanish news agency EFE reported that Venezuelan military intelligence operatives raided Stanford International Bank in Caracas and investigated three Stanford Bank employees at the Venezuela branch believed to be US drug-running intelligence agents. The press is also reporting an extremely unfortunate photo of Stanford and Barack Obama ‘in happier times’.

So you see, folks (to coin a phrase), it’s not simply all about the money, it’s ALL ABOUT THE CIA MONEY: THE COLOSSAL DRUG-TRAFFICKING AND FRAUDULENT FINANCE CRIMINAL PONZI NEXUS upon which the power to control the US Government USURPED by the CIA rests.

• The CIA is IN CONTROL, OUT OF CONTROL, and needs to be BROUGHT UNDER CONTROL, which is not about to happen under Leon Panetta, who ‘ran the money’, didn’t he, under Clinton. And this, in turn, is WHY the financial sorcerers in the White House and the Treasury are risking a catastrophic collapse: because they defer NOT to the US President, but rather to the reprobate, arrogant, ruthless Intelligence Power that CONTROLS the President, and which has USURPED the Presidency given its power as the ‘State within the State’ (operating from the George Bush Center for Terrorism), acquired by financial corruption and its allegiance to the DVD’s George Bush Sr..

• All of which brings to mind our letter to the British Ministry of Defence some months ago, in which we asked: WHAT ARE WE DOING IN AFGHANISTAN? And to which, as subsequently reported, the Editor received NO REPLY. The lack of response reflected the fact that the MOD knew that any response would be displayed on our website: so, rather than LIE TO US, they didn’t respond at all.

Today, The Daily Telegraph carries an op-ed article ASKING THE SAME QUESTION. The article begins as follows: ‘ALTHOUGH IT HAS YET TO COME CLEAN ON THE ISSUE, the Government believes that our commitment in Afghanistan will last for generations. Our Ambassador to Kabul blithely mentioned us being there for “30 years”. BUT WHAT ARE WE THERE FOR?’

The author, Michael Burleigh, doesn’t say. He thinks we are ‘chasing phantoms’. WE SAY:

• NO, WE’RE NOT, SIR. WE’RE CLAIMING AND GRABBING CONTROL OF THE DRUG TRADE. That’s why the idiot Brit in Kabul says we’ll be there for 30 years. Because that’s how long they think it’s going to take to ELIMINATE THE OPPOSITION.

• By its cowardly non-response to the Editor’s straightforward question (which it can rectify at any time, to ‘correct’ any ‘misapprehensions’ we may have), the Ministry of Defence has confirmed by its default, that it is a criminal enforcement organisation.

• Like the Central Intelligence Agency and the US military.

IN OTHER WORDS, the British Government SUPPORTS THE CIA, which means that it is perfectly content that this revolutionary US ‘State within the State’ controls the US Government, which by extension means that the British Government is a co-conspirator in the entire range of scandals.

So the ‘Special Relationship’ has decayed to the point at which it serves exclusively the interest of a vast, unfettered criminal enterprise which knows no bounds to its abuse of power. And treads all over the British at every possible opportunity, by the way. Indeed it treats the Brits with disdain.

In any rational environment, that would be cause enough for a comprehensive suspension of these intelligence relations until such time as the Americans get round to cleaning up their act.

• UPDATE 23RD FEBRUARY: EU ELITE FEASTS WHILE THE WORLD CRUMBLES
We are not commenting quite yet on familiar financial issues we have been asked to comment on, because (a) certain information we hold has to be held back due to ongoing geopolitical ‘real-time’ considerations and (b) because other information is not yet ‘hard’ enough to be used. So, instead, you may be interested in the following description of filthy EU pigs with their stinking snouts in the feeding trough that appeared in an article in Murdoch’s Sunday Times, even, on 22nd February:

‘The past few months have been an interesting time to be working in Brussels’.

‘Outside, in the real world, reputable banks crumbled to dust, shares went into a nosedive, big companies became close to worthless, hundreds of thousands lost their jobs and millions feared the worst. Inside the Eurobubble, you’d hardly have known. The elite continued to go to champagne
receptions in the evenings before eating in highly-rated restaurants at taxpayers’ expense’.

‘They continued to flit from city to city to attend meetings; continued to fly around the world on fact-finding missions; and continued to think up ever more rules and regulations to help organise the
lives of the European Union’s 500 million citizens’.

Our only further comment would be that had the Editor written this, the language would have been, as the erstwhile Carlyle employee John Major used to say, ‘not inconsiderably’ fruitier.

‘STRUCTURED PRODUCTS’: TOXIC INVENTION OF A MASSIVE BANKERS’ RAMP

REVALIDATING AND FALSELY REVALUING WORTHLESS ASSETS

ROOT CAUSE OF THE GLOBAL CRISIS: THE CIA FUNDS ITSELF BY FRAUD

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: THE DUBAI THEFT • GREENSPAN’S INDICTMENT

PUFFING UP FLAWED POLICIES GUARANTEED TO FAIL

THE SOLUTION

WHY THE SOLUTION IS BEING BLOCKED, AND WHO IS BLOCKING IT

FRIGHTENED HEDGE FUND OPERATIVES MEET AT GOLDMAN SACHS

COALITION OF PARTIES BLOCKING THE REFUNDING

ANATOMY OF MBS-CDO-CDS FRAUDULENT FINANCE OPERATIONS

NSA STEALS ICR TEXT PROVING TARP WAS A SCAM TO REFUND CARLYLE, BUSH ET AL.

THE DIAGRAMS TO BE PUBLISHED WITH OUR PAPER

FAT CAT BRITISH BANKERS SO SORRY THEY LOST THEIR OWN MONEY

BARCLAYS BANK’S FALSE BALANCE SHEET

WHY WE WERE TOLD TO ‘COOL IT’ ON CRITICISING BANKERS

A COUPLE OF PERTINENT ‘PERISH THE THOUGHTS!’

SNAPSHOTS OF PONZI CRISIS FALLOUT IN BRITAIN AND EUROPE

EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S DELUSIONS ABOUT ‘ASSET RELIEF’

SWISS RE SCRAPS ITS DERIVATIVES OPERATION COMPLETELY

WORST PROSPECTS FOR BRITAIN SINCE 1931

GOVERNMENTS UNABLE TO HANDLE HUGE INSTITUTIONAL COLLAPSES

MADOFF UPDATES

OUR SUSPICION OF A STITCH-UP IS SUPPORTED BY ANOTHER SOURCE

CRUDE CIA BLACKMAIL THREAT AGAINST MI-6

IN MEMORIAM

REACTIONS TO OUR REVELATION CONCERNING MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S.

THE LIBELLOUS ATTACK ON MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S.

THE EDITOR’S INTERIM STATEMENT

MICHAEL C. COTTRELL’S SWORN AFFIDAVIT IN RESPONSE TO THE ATTACK

• Attack on the Editor by Heneghan following this posting:
This operative has now dispensed libel in the Editor’s direction, a somewhat foolish move as it is plainly now open to the Editor to take action against him for libel in the English Court. Readers can of course judge for themselves whether an operative who loses no opportunity to excoriate Mrs Clinton yet at the same time contributes to the Hillary Clinton for President political campaign, is someone in whom trust can be placed when assessing the veracity of his so-called ‘intelligence’. And by the way, the Editor is not an intelligence ‘asset’: ‘liability’ would clearly be more accurate!

We have no information to suggest that this reckless operative has seen fit to retract his earlier libels against Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., and Colonel Dana Wilcox, and likewise no overtures have been forthcoming from this fellow to retract his libels and fabrications against the Editor of this service. Presumably he assumes that he is somehow protected from the consequences of his rash behaviour. According to what we hear, we strongly doubt that this can be the case. Since we have been ‘asked to comment’ on Heneghan’s libels against the Editor, here is our comment: they are libels, see? What he has stated concerning the Editor represents febrile fabricated gibberish.

The Editor has been asked to point out that anyone ‘out there’ who wants to know more about the background to these ignorant rants, and why they are doing them, should get directly in touch with Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., at his phone number 814-455 9218. Calls will only be accepted from parties who reveal their full identity. Spooks and others who hide their identities because they are scared of being exposed by us, will naturally not be inclined to make such a telephone call.

• Greenspan update: Enquiries by the Editor have CONFIRMED that that Dr Alan Greenspan WAS arrested the week before last, and we know precisely WHO performed the arrest. This being the case, it is reasonable to ask why this crook has been allowed to remain in circulation, delivering a speech, for instance, to dummies attending the Economic Club of New York on 17th February.

The answer appears to be that the 45-page indictment has NOT been withdrawn, that he HAS been arrested, and for all we know he may be walking around with an electronic tag on his right foot.

As these reports inter alia have established, there is one rule for crooks operating at the highest levels, and another for subsidiary crooks, such as the Bush laundryman ‘Sir’ Allen Stanford, who tried to escape from the United States on the 18th February but was frustrated when the private jet firm hired to fly him to Antigua, refused his dodgy card. The Stanford unravelfest is of course just another dimension of the spasms of violent implosions arising from the exposures of this hive of Fraudulent Finance – which has completely destabilised all governments, central banks and their advisers, who have responded with chaotic, uncoordinated, pointless, knee-jerk ‘do-something’ policy changes, such as reducing interest rates to close to zero, and thereby effectively deleting the financial sector from the equation: which is why Greenspoon is now ‘calling for’ nationalisation of all banks. Not only is he himself specifically responsible for the crisis, but central government control of banks = Communism, which places ALL assets in the hands of guess who: THE CROOKS.

Zero rates WORSEN the prospective plight of the banks, as depositors seek actively to improve returns, thus threatening the finances of the banks which were corrupted by the Bush-Greenspan derivatives Ponzi operations. We will be deconstructing some of these flailing responses later.

•INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW, Volume 34, #2: This issue is now well advanced in our print works and will be distributed worldwide soon. As indicated previously and below, it contains three flowcharts which show how the fake ‘derivatives’ sector represents a gigantic BANKERS’ RAMP, how the Paulson TARP operation was designed to reliquefy the likes of Carlyle, Carlyle Capital, George Bush Sr. and other familiar perpetrators, and why ALL derivatives ‘products’ are frauds – equipped, even, with their own esoteric language, the purpose of which is to prevent ordinary mortals from understanding how these interrelated Ponzi Scheme operations function.

But it is historically true that ALL Ponzi schemes implode sooner of later. What makes the present situation unprecedented in the history of fallen humanity is that (a) what is happening was indeed predicted here long before anyone had ever heard of Roubini, and (b) all the Ponzi operations are interlinked. Hence reports of EIGHT more Ponzi collapses pending in Europe, the panic that is now evident everywhere as it has been realised that hardly any institutions managed to avoid being caught up in the corruption, and the chaotic responses of terrified governments and officials who have not understood the central issue: THE DERIVATIVES ARE FAKE AND HENCE WORTHLESS.

International Currency Review may be ordered direct via this website. To order the forthcoming issue alone, please enter a regular order and ALSO send us an email via the CONTACT US tab to state that you specifically require International Currency Review Volume 34, #2 only. We have to charge a premium for individual issues, as we sell only serials in the normal course of business.
On this occasion, we are charging $300 for this issue, incorporating a 50% DONATION mark-up.

All such orders, as with all donations made to assist us with the financing of this research and our necessary exposures, are appreciated and acknowledged by the Editor.

• MADOFF ‘VICTIMS’ LIST: Two reports were posted on 6th February 2009 containing the entire list of customers of Bernard L. Madoff Securities, Inc.. Because the list is so huge, we divided it into two segments: Clients A-N; and clients O-Z, plus a Miscellaneous Section. See: Archive. Our list is the easiest to load and clearest of the lists that have been reproduced privately on the Internet.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice is comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the brave contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

• The CONTACT US facility is found in the red box throughout this combined website.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• Please Make a Donation to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing global financial corruption investigations, which have turned the whole world upside down and have exposed the corruption which was intended to enable the geocriminalist syndicate to seize the wealth of the entire world. These people have finally been more or less completely stopped in their tracks as a consequence of these exposures. Your assistance will be sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. The Editor’s $35,000 Wanta bail-out money was not repaid and so has been stolen. It will be collected in due course and the thief will be appropriately dealt with, having so far taken no steps at all to repay the Editor’s loan funds, which should have been remitted on 11th June 2007.

• See the second white panel for details of our latest distributed intelligence publications.

• Subscriptions by serious observers and analysts to our services may be placed via this website.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

INTRODUCTION
We can now complete the metaphor that we held in suspense following the American Presidential Election. After hovering in mid-air trying to decide whether to fall headlong into the fire or not, the CIA-controlled US Federal Government under President Obama has fallen face-first into the (Ring of) Fire, and is in the process of being consumed in the flames.

The flames are fanned by a lethally explosive incendiary device called a Banker’s Ramp.

Instead of accepting that the products of the Bankers’ Ramp – so-called derivative ‘Structured Products’ – are without instrinsic value, the fools and co-conspirators in the US Treasury and at the Federal Reserve under Bernanke thought they could con the world, as Mr Paulson tried to do, into believing that these worthless fraudulent assets could be repackaged with an insurance wrap, and thereby converted from trash status with no recourse to the underlying flow of real cash-cash, into value-laden assets of tangible value. Which is impossible. Natch, this latest marketing ploy failed even as it was being tentatively launched.

For unsurprisingly, Treasury Secretary Geithner’s revamped version of the duplicitous H. Paulson TARP scheme, the purpose of which was to refinance Carlyle, Carlyle Capital, George H. W. Bush Sr. and other notorious Fraudulent Finance parties [see below], was given an immediate thumbs-down by the financial markets on 10th February, even as Mr Geithner was speaking. Specifically, the S & P 500 closed down 4.9%, while its financial sub-index fell on the day by 11%.

The widespread decline wiped out most of the preceding week’s strong stock market gains, with JPMorganChase and Wells Fargo shares losing 9.8% and 14.2% respectively, while Bank of America and Citigroup stocks dropped by 19.3% and 15.2%.

Now this Geithner fellow is the son of Peter F. Geithner, the Director of the Asia Program at the Ford Foundation in New York. Mr Geither’s dad oversaw the Ford Foundation’s micro-finance operations in Indonesia which were being developed by Ann Dunham-Soetoro, the mother of President Barack Obama. Timothy Geithner’s maternal grandfather, whose name was Charles F. Moore, was an adviser to President Eisenhower, and was also a Vice President of Ford Motor Company. Timothy Geithner spent most of his childhood living outside the United States, first graduating from the International School in Bangkok. He also obtained a degree from Dartmouth College in Government and Asian studies, and his MA from Johns Hopkins University was in international economics.

Yet notwithstanding Geithner’s superb educational background and qualifications, the much-heralded Geithner statement, as predicted, was a complete flop. Mr Geithner had evidently not received sufficient education to be able to discern that what he was intending to propose would collapse like the remainder of a child’s balloon after it has been popped; and nor, it appears, was he in any way disposed to read the trailer for his expected flop that we published on this website on 8th February, ahead of his presentation.

According to market sources, the primary cause of the resulting uncertainty was, as one voice put it, that ‘the question of how to value banks’ toxic assets remains unanswered’.

Which was a petty silly complaint, given the fact of the matter, known to all market participants who aren’t high on speed: THEY CAN’T.

The reason that the banks’ derivatives assets haven’t been valued and cannot be valued is that THEY HAVE NO VALUE. They are figments of financial marketing sorcerers’ imaginations.

The very word ‘derivative’ itself contains the brazen lie that the subsequent ‘Structured Products’ are DERIVED from the original transaction, whereas in reality the cashflow from the original deal does not ‘travel’, and the subsequent parties have NO RECOURSE to the hard cashflow from the original transaction, so that they are handling phantom trades divorced from the original contract.

‘STRUCTURED PRODUCTS’: TOXIC INVENTION OF A MASSIVE BANKERS’ RAMP
This reality, which has been borne in on even the dumbest dumkopf since our exposures, will be spelled out in the forthcoming issue of International Currency Review with the benefit of simple flow-charts showing how derivatives ‘assets’ are created and are fraudulently ‘marketed’ without recourse to the sole source of real money – the payments to the Mortgage Bank of the mortgagor, or the payments of the credit card holder to the card issuer. All subsequent derivative ‘Structured Products’ are fraudulent Ponzi-model scams, because they have no value given that none of the subsequent derivatives parties have recourse to the original source of funds [see below].

That derivative ‘Structured Products’ are symptomatic of a massive Bankers’ Ramp which has loaded European institutions with perhaps as much as $30 trillion of dud assets, is implied not only by the facts of the matter (explained in greater detail below), but also by the rather pertinent fact that traders on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange tell us from the pits that they regard derivatives products as completely worthless, and will not be interested in exotic new Treasury instruments (‘Geithners’) designed to turn sawdust into gold.

Likewise, as previously reported, the regional US Federal Reserve Banks consider derivative products to be without intrinsic value – a stance that places them at odds with Geithner’s former employer, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and the Federal Reserve Board under the co-conspirator Dr Ben Bernanke, both of which institutions specialise in Fraudulent Finance.

No-one, either at home or abroad, in the G-7 or the G-20, is going to be interested in any magic formula developed by the US Treasury to persuade investors that derivatives-based repackaged Ponzi-model ‘Geithners’ marketed with a US official guarantee and US Treasury imprimatur are a sound investment. It won’t fly.

For given the worldwide awakening to the truth about this Fraudulent Ponzi-model finance, the likelihood of foreigners rushing to purchase degraded US Treasury ‘Geithners’ masquerading as of intrinsic worth when the reality is that they consist of recycled toxic waste, has shrunk to nearly zero – not least given that Mr Geithner has shown himself to be even less proficient at pulling the wool over the markets’ eyes than the serial fraudster Henry M. Paulson was in his notorious day.

REVALIDATING AND FALSELY REVALUING WORTHLESS ASSETS
No, what the US Administration – now completely under the control of the Bush-Clinton criminal finance continuum – was crassly intending to do, was to revalidate the Bankers’ Ramp as though there has been no discontinuity – an extraordinarily stupid and blind course to adopt.

For the Fraudulent Finance engineers inside the Central Intelligence Agency, the Treasury and the Obama White House were hoping to ignore the much greater overall sophistication of sensitised observers since these exposures started in 2006, and to deny all that has happened during this distressing period – the blatant official corruption, the duplicity and diversionary operations, the wall-to-wall disinformation and propaganda, the endless lies and spiels about ‘filling in the holes’ when what was meant was that pyramid-selling participants were being paid off with ‘new money’ derived from other victims of the scams, the suicides, the false reports of imminent settlement recycled every week out of the gutter – and to pull a new Fraudulent Rabbit out of the Treasury’s box of magic tricks, as the US Treasury has done so often before.

But this time, the Magic Rabbit disappeared before it was even out of the hat. It was scared away by the glaring light of global scepticism and the absence of the smoke and mirrors cover to which it is accustomed. For the age of smoke and mirrors is over.

No longer can the US Treasury convince anyone in the world that has the answer to the mess for which it is responsible, on behalf of the controlling Intelligence Power (see previous report and below). And one reason that the US Treasury has lost all credibility – apart from the fact that, under Paulson, who systematically trashed the Full Faith and Credit of the United States, it became known as the Lie Factory – is that it is deliberately, under heavy pressure from the Bush Crime Family, the Clintons and associates, the Chicago FBI, and the CIA, choosing the WRONG PATH, despite the fact that it knows perfectly well what the CORRECT COURSE OF ACTION SHOULD BE.

Yes, the US Treasury knows what it SHOULD DO, but is obtusely continuing with the Bush-Paulson policy of Fraudulent Finance instead of adopting the SINGLE COURSE OF ACTION that would soon guarantee an end to the crisis. Given the extreme gravity of the situation, this represents nothing less than wilful treason against the United States and its people, and a perverse intent to pursue the worst possible course which, if not reversed, will bankrupt the whole world.

ROOT CAUSE OF THE GLOBAL CRISIS: THE CIA FUNDS ITSELF BY FRAUD
It would be comforting, perhaps, to believe that US Treasury officials are just incompetent. But the record shows that no, they seem to be malevolent: they are wilfully impeding and standing in the way of resolution of all outstanding problems over time, by obtusely insisting upon an open-ended continuation of deficit-financing operations to sustain off-balance sheet Fraudulent Ponzi-model Finance, so that the US criminal élite’s cronies can continue to generate false, unreported and so untaxed profits from their unproductive and illicit speculative activity and can continue hiding the proceeds untaxed in offshore bank accounts. And the primary reason for this madness is the factor we again identified in the preceding report:

• The Treasury’s stance is governed by the fact that it defers to the Intelligence Power which controls the US Federal Government, selects its personnel, and has usurped the power of the Executive Branch. As we have frequently pointed out, the CIA is in control, out of control and needs to be brought under control.

And guess what: they don’t like us reminding you of this fact.

• Because when we do so, we are in fact pinpointing the core of the problem facing the United States and the WHOLE WORLD, which is that the Central Intelligence Agency (proxy for the vast, corrupted US intelligence community and its drug-running operations) is a self-financing ‘State within the State’ that controls the Executive, Legislative and Judicial Branches of Government – not the other way round. The CIA is supposed to be the clandestine arm of the White House.

But thanks to its proven ability to penetrate all other branches of Government and its structures, and to finance its operations on a gargantuan scale using drug-trafficking proceeds and Ponzi schemes of ever increasing sophistication, it has usurped the US Government itself.

For it was the intelligence community that developed these Fraudulent Finance schemes in the first place. Who do you suppose provided traders with the special satellite-linked ‘grey screen’ trading equipment enabling Agency operatives based in the boonies to conduct secret Fraudulent Finance trading operations within the closed financial system that is at the root of this crisis?

The equipment is provided by the Intelligence Power. The Editor knows of one family where the successive husbands operated this equipment clandestinely without even explaining what they were doing to their family members. And this secret trading, designed to increase the illicit, hidden takings of the Intelligence Power through Fraudulent Finance, goes on all over the United States.

The Intelligence Power finances itself via Fraudulent Finance operations and is jealous of its total independence from Congress and of its power to control the Government. Key figures throughout the Administration are either intelligence operatives or puppets of the CIA.

Therefore, the Administration defers to the Intelligence Power, instead of the CIA operating from a position of subordination to the Executive Branch.

• That is the nub of the crisis facing the whole world.

It is the CIA et al. that is blocking resolution of this crisis, by ensuring that the Treasury seeks to continue the Fraudulent Finance activity, which is supposed to be funded by a vast increase (so it supposes) in official debt, with no prospect of any of it ever being amortised.

This is of course a recipe for disaster, collapse and a wheelbarrow future: and the culprit is the CIA.
It is the corrupt US Intelligence Power that pulls all the strings and is insisting upon the Treasury retaining control over ‘recovery financing’, despite the reality that the Treasury and the Federal Reserve can never achieve the objective that the CIA insists upon, because no-one in their right mind is going to buy the repackaged Treasury trash for long, if at all.

Therefore, the US and global crisis boils down to the very issue identified a long time ago by this service: the Central Intelligence Agency is jealous of its hegemony which is financed by Fraudulent Finance and fears that when its Ponzi operations cease, it will LOSE its hegemony status and will cease to be in any position to control the Government, especially the Executive Branch.

Given moreover that the Central Intelligence Agency is a criminal enterprise directed de facto by the Bush Crime Family with its Clinton add-ons (2) via the George Bush Center for Terrorism (oops, Intelligence), it may well view the threat to its hegemony by the ongoing and irreversible collapse of the derivatives fraud as a pretext for taking matters even further into its own hands, by which we mean perpetrating some atrocity or other to provide a pretext for drastic domestic repression. This may satisfy its power lust but will not, of course, solve its financial problems insofar as the collapse of the derivatives sector will leave it dependent solely on its drug-trafficking proceeds.

In this connection we need to reiterate that anonymous, unprovenanced reports by a fictitious source calling itself Sorcha Faal and purporting to be derived from the Kremlin, is actually a diversionary disinformation operation perpetrated by an Irishman, S. L. O’Huallachain and by Commander J. Forrest Sharpe, of Light in the Darkness Publications, Vienna, VA, located, as we recently pointed out, deep in US intelligence communitysville, according to our sources.

Sharpe is said to be ‘active duty submarine service fleet’, implying an Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) link here – ONI being one of the most ruthless of all the arms of the CIA sub-Octopus, as well as ‘incidentally’ being where Admiral Blair, the new Director of National Intelligence (DNI), comes from: which probably tells you all you need to know about the agenda of such reports.

As previously noted, they begin with the phrase ‘Rumours circulating in the Kremlin today’, a tell-tale giveaway, as the Editor’s long service as Editor of Soviet Analyst entitles him to state without fear of contradiction that the Kremlin doesn’t DO rumours.

No, this is just another outlet for the destructive US domestic intelligence war and for gratuitous scaremongering, agitation and propaganda spewed out by the scared ‘State within the State’ which correctly perceives that it is in severe danger of being cut down to size as a consequence of the exposure and implosion of its Fraudulent Finance operations which sustain its usurped status as the power that controls the Federal Government, whereas it is supposed to be the subordinate clandestine arm of the Executive Branch.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: THE DUBAI THEFT • GREENSPAN’S INDICTMENT
With reference to the massive sum of money that was diverted to Dubai on Friday 6th February, threatening the likelihood at the time that Citibank might have been unable to open its doors on Monday 9th February, the funds were retrieved over that weekend so that, in the event, Citibank did not collapse and was able to open for business.

As we reported, that event precipitated the cancellation of the State Visit to Dubai and Abu Dhabi by The Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh previously planned for late March – an analysis that we were subsequently told was ‘absolutely accurate’.

Concerning the cuffing of the arch-criminal finance specialist Dr Alan Greenspan, there are now at least four versions concerning this operative’s arrest: (a) He was arrested on or about Monday 2nd February; (b) he was cuffed on Friday 6th February, as we reported; (c) he was cuffed on Thursday 5th February 2009, which we are now inclined to believe would have been more accurate than (b), because we also now think that the funds were diverted to Dubai on Thursday the 5th, or at least overnight 5th/6th February; and now (d) a warrant has been issued for Greenspan’s arrest, which (as of the morning of 12th February) remained pending.

On 12th February we learned that a 45-page indictment has been prepared against Greenspan, and this information was confirmed by a separate very reliable source.

In addition, a batch of officials at the Federal Reserve who thought they were TSTBA (‘Too Senior to Be Arrested’) were reported to us on 12th February to have been arrested in the context of their continuing sabotage of the Settlements. And on Wednesday 11th February, 18 examinations of the biggest US banks were initiated, with a team of some 100 bank examiners descending like locusts on Citibank, JPMorganChase, Bank of America and other US criminal financial enterprises looking inter alia for derivatives exposures. In this connection we have learned that there exists a circle of very high-level and influential bankers and traders whose names are not currently in the public eye, who have been systematically blocking the Settlements, while at the same time continuing their headlong derivatives Ponzi trading operations.

As for the meltdown inside the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), accused by Harry Markopolos before the House Financial Services Subcommittee of failing for many years to take necessary measures against Bush-Ponzi fraudster Bernard L. Madoff, the agency’s previously referenced leading enforcement officer, Linda Thomsen, was reported be resigning ‘to pursue opportunities in the private sector’. Obviously, she decided that the heat in the kitchen was excessive for her fragile constitution.

We have been further advised that certain other very well-known characters on the stage are targeted for arrest and indictment. These developments reflect the fact, stressed to us by reliable sources, that there is now a consensus that these arrogant financial sector Financial Terrorists (which is what they are) are not above the law.

Let us hope that this time round, Law Enforcement makes the arrests in front of the TV and press cameras, as we have advised in the past: that would be the single most effective step that could be taken to bring this crisis to a head so that the unavoidable, sabotaged shakeout is not fudged.

PUFFING UP FLAWED POLICIES GUARANTEED TO FAIL
Against this incredible background, the Secretary of the United States Treasury stood up before the whole world on 10th February 2009 and announced that he intends to perpetuate a gigantic fraud! His ill-considered plan was dead in the water the moment it was announced.

As a consequence, the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve have made themselves the laughing stock among those elements of the financial intelligentsia and of key official structures around the world who know precisely what should be done, and have watched with renewed astonishment at the endless capacity for these US financial sorcerers to imagine that they can continue lying and deceiving the markets, the investing public, the American people and the Rest of the World.

As for President Obama’s ‘stimulus bill’, it represents a big band-aid which would be better applied to a bandicoot, because of course it simply adds further to the debt in the background and fails to address the central issue, namely that CASH REVENUE has to materialise in order for the banks to be refloated ON THE BOOKS.

The only possible justification for this rash initiative, which narrowly passed the Senate on 13th February, would be as a short-term stop-gap measure pending the REVENUE cashflows triggered by the G-7-Approved Refunding Programme – which is what President Obama appears to have had in mind, and which his own personnel are obtusely blocking.

The banks CANNOT be refloated via the revalidation and revaluing of worthless junk through the issuance of more and more ‘background Treasury debt’ on the scale required – not least because no insurance wrapround that the Treasury and the Federal Reserve might devise can compensate for the fact that the markets have seen through the Ponzi scams and are not proposing to gobble up any US Treasury repackaged trash ‘assets’ with falsified ‘values’ anytime soon. The Treasury’s purpose all along, as under Paulson, has been to perpetuate opportunities for Fraudulent Finance so that the off-balance sheet proceeds of these Ponzi frauds can be stashed untaxed in offshore bank accounts by the self-appointed privileged ‘élite’ serving the selfish and treasonous interests of the terrified US Intelligence Power.

In fairness, it should also be stressed that the lethal derivatives Ponzi trading carousel is being sustained by the ‘powerful’ circle of top traders and bankers alluded to above, upon whom the Treasury is said to rely when it needs ‘assistance’, who consider themselves literally to be above the law, immune from arrest and prosecution, and who function inside what they consider to be a ‘protective zone’ of privilege within which ‘legitimised’ Fraudulent Finance can be practised with impunity. These people are about to discover that, contrary to that complacent assumption, the game has changed as a discontinuity has taken place which they have chosen not to recognise.

THE SOLUTION
The universal solution to the global systemic financial corruption crisis has been on the table for several years, and was specifically re-approved by the Group of Seven Financial Powers at their summit meetings in 2007 and 2008. The adjective ‘universal’ is applicable because implementation of the agreed-upon solution will, over quite a short space of time, refloat the banks by generating accruals on-the-books, revalidate the US dollar and the US dollar financial system in the process, revitalise the world trading system as a consequence, and shower the US Treasury with ongoing windfall tax accruals which will transform its finances and reverse the centuries-long one-way deficit-financing and debt accumulation route to financial collapse.

Banks will be refloated on balance-sheet very quickly because accruals arising from transparent transactions with the appropriate capital markets instruments as prescribed by the G-7 will cascade into the banks in the form of deposits, transforming the banks’ balance sheets in the process.

This solution, like all truthful and straightforward means of resolving problems, is the essence of simplicity. By contrast, the covert, surreptitious, off-balance sheet, untaxed, secretive, fraudulent derivatives ‘Structured Products’ operations based on worthless assets generating fake yields, are enveloped in a fog of extreme complexity, as will be revealed in somewhat excruciating detail in the forthcoming issue of International Currency Review [Volume 34, #2].

The universal solution to the global systemic financial corruption crisis consists of the following straightforward and wholly transparent response:

• The ongoing conduct of fully taxed on-balance sheet capital markets instrument transactions with selected institutions in the PRIVATE SECTOR (therefore wholly independently of the DEBT-BUILDING public sector), as approved by the Group of Seven Financial Powers in 2007 and 2008, using LOAN funds provided pro bono publico for this purpose at her sole discretion primarily by the British Head of State, the total value of which is $6.2 trillion.

[These funds were placed into ‘lockdown’ on 12th September 2008, after it had transpired that instead of being deployed for the purpose intended by the lender(s), the funds had been illegally subjected to exploitation to finance the Fraudulent Finance Ponzi-model carousel.

After these funds, plus an additional $7.8 trillion of monies owned by the Chinese parties, went into ‘lockdown’, flows of funds needed to finance the corrupt illicit trades – with the exception of the drug money flows sustaining interbank operations as identified by the Executive Director of the Vienna-based United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), Sr. Antonio Maria Costa, which were referenced in our report dated 8th February 2009, dried up – triggering mass redemptions, including an estimated $7.0 billion of redemptions by clients of the Bush-linked Ponzi scheme manipulator, Bernard L. Madoff, as described in earlier reports].

• Such ON-BALANCE SHEET PRIVATE SECTOR capital markets transactions will generate REVENUE which will be TAXED, yielding ongoing windfall tax accruals to the American Treasury – which, by definition, will reverse the century-old decadent US one-way deficit-financing orgy accumulating vast mountains of official debt in the background which can never be repaid, accompanied by the degradation of Treasury securities and the US dollar itself to trash status.

• Under this wholly transparent Group of Seven-Approved Capital Markets Refunding Programme, Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. is instructed to conduct the on-balance sheet transactions using the appropriate instruments through his firm Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., in accordance with the lenders’ instructions.

• In our report dated 8th February 2009, we revealed the foregoing information for the first time, in the face of the intransigent intention of the American Treasury to continue with the Ponzi-model Fraudulent Finance operations to which it and its associates, especially the relevant hedge fund operatives, have become accustomed.

The Treasury’s approach is wrong-headed and perverse, not least because it will simply pile debt upon bad debt upon very bad debt, while purveying for public consumption a FALSE PROSPECTUS based upon the lie that worthless derivatives ‘Structured Product’ ‘assets’ have value, which is not the case. In other words, the US Treasury’s sterile proposals on behalf of the hedge funds, ‘private equity’ ‘players’ and banks ‘working for’ George Bush Sr., which were dead in the water on delivery anyway, would falsely represent that trash ‘assets’ contain value, a gross deception and fraud.

• In our report dated 8th February, we further recommended that the G-7-Approved Refunding Programme outlined above should proceed anyway, as has been specifically instructed ‘per the request/affidavit dated 29th December 2008’, but through London rather than New York.

• By definition, the GOOD, TRANSPARENT, TAXED REVENUE dollars accruing from the approved Capital Markets transactions under the G-7-Approved $ Refunding Programme will very definitely displace the BAD MONEY FALSELY GENERATED by the complex, Fraudulent Finance Ponzi-model operations that the US Treasury seeks to perpetuate, for the reasons explained below.

WHY THE SOLUTION IS BEING BLOCKED, AND WHO IS BLOCKING IT
Bear in mind that the G-7-Approved Refunding Plan is, as we constantly reiterate, APPROVED by the Group of Seven Financial Powers, which are fighting for their economic survival in the face of the recalcitrance of the American criminal financiers who are holding the whole world to ransom.

As noted above, the SOLUTION has been on the global table for several years and if it had been implemented in 2006/2007, instead of being hijacked by the corrupt Paulson Treasury so that funds could be stolen and the later LOAN monies belonging to the lender(s) abused and exploited, the whole world would not now be experiencing the ‘train wreck’ that we predicted on this website on 2nd September 2006, in December 2006, and in reports published here and in our journal in June and July 2007. We predicted the ‘train wreck’ accurately because we saw then that the corrupt US Treasury had no intention of implementing the G-7-Approved Refunding Programme and that the constant barrage of ‘we’ll pay you tomorrow’ rhetoric, with its innumerable variants, represented a cynical CIA counterintelligence propaganda offensive designed to enable the organised criminal cadres inside the US official structures and their allies to continue trading derivatives, to sustain the bubble of Fraudulent Finance, and to keep the army of outraged protesters at bay indefinitely.

Quite simply, the cloth-ears at the US Treasury preferred to continue down their yellow brick road, enriching themselves and their co-conspirators in the process, under the protection of the corrupt Chicago component of the FBI and the Bush-Clinton organised crime operations – to the general satisfaction of the expanded domestic and international élite that has been so corrupted by this Fraudulent Finance ever since George H. W. Bush Sr., stole the money from Continental Illinois Trust Company in the 1980s.

FRIGHTENED HEDGE FUND OPERATIVES MEET AT GOLDMAN SACHS
Immediately following the damp-squib Geithner presentation of the US Treasury’s immediately discredited plan for open-ended Ponzi-style finance stretching out to the end of the solar system, about 20 alarmed US hedge and ‘private equity’ Ponzi-money fund operatives, meeting under the auspices of the so-called ‘Goldman Sachs Roundtable’, gathered in emergency session to thrash out their concerns that, from their perspective, things were now falling apart, since Mr Geithner’s proposals, on which some had pinned their hopes, had gone down like a wayward lead balloon. Those attending included representatives of KKR, Fortress Investment Group [FIG], Bain Capital, Perry Capital, Capital Research, Putnam, and Citadel.

People who attended told CNBC that they received an urgent invitation to go to the meeting after Geithner’s speech. Goldman Sachs, which initially denied that the meeting ever took place, later reversed its position and confirmed that the meeting, hosted by John Winkelreid and Gary Cohn, was planned well in advance. How’s that for standing on your head without anyone noticing? Some of those who attended said that they decided to attend because of the Geithner speech. According to the CNBC report, aired by Charlie Gasparino [www.cnbc.com/id/29163525]:

‘What the group concluded was that the longer the ‘plan’ takes to produce, the more difficult the situation becomes. That’s because reviving the securitization market is the key toward reviving the economy and it’s a vicious circle [sic]. The longer it takes to revive securitization, the worse the economy becomes and the securitized products held by the banks lose more value’.

The foregoing CNBC statement contains egregious falsehoods that are self-evident but which nevertheless need to be spelt out given that CNBC also appears to be inhabited by cloth-eared economic ignoramuses:

• Revival of the real economy does NOT depend upon so-called revival of the ‘securitisation market’ consisting of worthless assets. First, there can be no such ‘revival’ now that the absolute worthlessness of the ‘securitised assets’ has been exposed, taken on board across the world, and ridiculed by traders in the Chicago pits – as well as by institutional investors and others who have had their corporate and fingers burned in the financial holocaust that has already taken place.

Further, as previously reported, the regional Federal Reserve Banks do not agree with the corrupt Federal Reserve Board under Dr Ben Bernanke and his Ponzi scheme predecessor, the frequently-braceleted Dr Alan Greenspan [see below], and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (FRBNY), that derivatives assets have any value. They have been exposed as trash, and that’s that.

• The ‘justification’ for derivatives transactions is the false argument that securitisation ‘spreads risk’. This only happens, however, in the sense that the Mortgage banks receive double or treble payments per mortgage (even quadruple payments in certain circumstances). The later remittances are discounted, but they all add up. But the purchasers of the securitised ‘Structured Products’ by definition acquire extreme risk for their money, because no party beyond the Mortgage bank has recourse to the only source of ‘real money’, which is the income stream from the borrower.

• The US economy is not ‘becoming worse’ BECAUSE ‘securitisation cannot be revived’, but rather because the sole SOLUTION to refinancing the banks, the US dollar and the world trading system has been and continues to be BLOCKED by the parties identified in this segment, including the foregoing attendees as the so-called Goldman Sachs Roundtable.

• The ‘securitised assets’ held by the banks cannot lose ‘more’ value, as they have already lost 100% of their value and it is impossible, therefore, for these non-assets to be devalued any further. As indicated below, Swiss Re, the second largest reinsurer in the world, has just scrapped its own investment bank and in the process has written down its derivatives ‘assets’ to their correct value:

• ZERO.

The CNBC pronouncement illustrates a stratum of gross ignorance and fatuous stupidity on the part of the CNBC correspondent, equalled only by the attitude of a BBC economics correspondent who belaboured the false point on 11th February that ‘no banker, no financial journalist, nobody if they cross their heart, could say that they foresaw this’.

Not if they weren’t reading the reports on this website, right.

And by the way, this standard technique, favoured by those who cannot see ahead, of tarring all analysts with the brush of their own blindness, ignorance and forecasting ineptitude, while familiar to this Editor who has observed this all his forecasting life, is a low trick routinely played by the blind leading the blind. Because they have fallen in the ditch, they assume that no-one could have led them away from it. It makes the mess they’re in less uncomfortable.

COALITION OF PARTIES BLOCKING THE REFUNDING
Who, then, is BLOCKING the Group of Seven-Approved Refunding Programme?

Answer: the following sinister coalition:

• The primary source of opposition to the G-7-Approved Refunding programme is the Intelligence Power, a.k.a. the Central Intelligence Agency and its extensions [see below], which finances its operations with all the funny money that the Ponzi schemes that it developed specifically for that purpose, generate. The Intelligence Power in the United States controls the Government, not the other way round. As we have frequently stated, the Intelligence Power is in control, out of control and needs to be brought under control.

It is significant that no matter how many times we have reiterated this glaringly obvious truth, not a single individual with whom we remain in contact, including of course those with a CIA background, has EVER picked this point up and given it the slightest support. The reason for this may be that all these people, without exception, are perfectly content with the status quo, which is as follows:

Given its FINANCIAL INDEPENDENCE FROM CONGRESS, the Intelligence Power has USURPED THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH of the Federal Government. The CIA is supposed to be the clandestine arm of the White House, instead of which, with the National Security Council (NSC), it CONTROLS the White House, and ensures that its own personnel or agents are always positioned in the most sensitive nodes of the structures, including the top slots.

• This is not democracy: it is corrupt, anti-democratic, abusive rule by a ‘State within the State’.

This overpowerful and ruthlessly amoral American ‘State within the State’ is financed by means of the Fraudulent Finance operations exposed in these reports. The ‘State within the State’, this controlling Intelligence Power, is unwilling to give up its hegemony over the Executive Branch (as well as de facto the other branches of the Federal Government). It is therefore purposefully and short-sightedly resisting and BLOCKING the implementation of the SOLUTION outlined above.

• Moreover the Intelligence Power is indifferent to the consequent suffering of the American people and the Rest of the World. It is concerned exclusively with the threatened retention of its control hegemony. It imagines that if it just continues this obnoxious resistance, it will ‘win out’ in the end. That is a false presumption.

• On the contrary, the longer the Intelligence Power BLOCKS the SOLUTION, the greater will be the consequent damage and the greater the likelihood that, with the disintegration of the nation, and the entire world economy as a direct outcome of its obtuse behaviour, the arrogant, ruthless and opinionated US Intelligence Power will be destroyed as well.

• But not all CIA/DIA operatives are as completely blind and stupid as painted above (it is possible to be very clever and smart, and stupid and blind at the same time). Some CIA operatives know perfectly well that things must change. They should assert themselves now, for the sake of the Republic and, as The Queen put it succinctly in 2007, ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’ – although we hold out very little hope of any such development.

• Finally, the CIA is absolutely PETRIFIED of the G-7-Approved Refunding Programme, because it is recognised in ‘circles that matter’ that in fact it MUST be implemented, cannot be side-stepped, and will indeed prevail. But its own personnel place their own wretched interests and that of the amoral Intelligence Power first. These people will have to undergo psychological re-orientation training come the Revolution, if they don’t change their stupid attitude before it’s too late.

Beyond this central factor, the coalition of operatives opposing the G-7-Approved Refunding Programme include the following:

• The US Treasury, under Geithner as under Paulson, which defers to the controlling Intelligence Power that controls the White House (although for public consumption purposes the US Treasury defers to the White House). As is the case within the CIA, not everyone inside the US Treasury is corrupt: on the contrary, it has been the case since these exposures developed, that one or more Treasury Compliance Officers have been threatened with jail sentences under the Patriot Acts for actually doing their jobs properly and resisting the corruption mandated under Henry M. Paulson.

• The Federal Reserve Bank of New York under Mr Geithner before he was translated to the US Treasury. As confirmed by the recent arrests, announced on this website, of Robert Armenta, the senior Federal Reserve Compliance Officer (who was offered a choice between 25 years in jail if he cooperated and 99 years if he chose not to divulge the names of those involved in these scams), and Christopher J. McCurdy, a senior Vice President who was arrested after he had destroyed the crucial banking codes associated with the Settlements, the New York Fed is a nest of corruption. Under Geithner it presided over frauds exposed in our reports, and it is at loggerheads with the regional Federal Reserve Banks who are unanimous, as we have previously reported, that the derivatives ‘assets’ are worthless. The FRBNY works closely with:

• The corrupt Federal Reserve Board under Dr Ben Bernanke, who has continued and elaborated upon the Fraudulent Finance operations exploiting the closed Federal Inter Bank Settlement Fund developed under his corrupt, often-arrested predecessor, Dr Alan Greenspan – the inventor of the ‘never-pay syndrome’ which, with the benefit of hindsight and closer understanding nowadays of the universality of the Ponzi model, was actually a symptom of universal Ponziness.

This ‘never-pay syndrome’, supported by that noisy barrage of duplicitous disinformation promising payment tomorrow, painting false descriptions of arrangements having been made for Trustees to be called into banks and banking codes having been altered, and so forth, elaborated by reports of banks not co-operating, answerbacks not arriving, and any other variation on the theme of why the payments were being blocked that they could think up overnight, turns out actually to have been nothing less than an integral component of Ponzi scheme methodology.

Ponzi scheme methodology operates on the principle that new money has to be found to pay off earlier investors or to pay them handsome returns with no questions asked, until the pyramid selling scheme collapses, when ALL THE MONEY IS STOLEN.

Further members of the coalition resisting the G-7-Approved Refunding Programme also include:

• The hedge fund and ‘private equity’ parties including those who attended the ‘Goldman Sachs Roundtable’ meeting, who are desperately trying to find a way to ‘fix the prices of the securitized bonds’ as Ken Griffen, the founder of Citadel, told CNBC after that meeting – despite the fact that trash ‘assets’ have no value so that any price-fixing would be fraudulent and therefore open to endless litigation in the courts.

• The corrupted banks which continue to promote and develop derivatives trading ‘opportunities’ and scams, as though there had been no discontinuity.

• FACT: Without derivative ‘Structured Products’ trading, there is no way these criminal enterprise banks, scamming hedge fund operatives and so-called ‘private equity’ Ponzi-groups can ever hope to recoup the monies for George Bush Sr. and which they themselves have lost on own account. They cannot believe ‘this has happened to them’, but it has.

• They cannot accept that there has been a decisive discontinuity, but there has.

• The Clintons, the Bush Crime Family and their compromised associates, including the former French President Chirac, and M. Levitte, the former French Ambassador to Washington, who is now President Sarkozy’s closest adviser, and a host of others including the US operatives Jan Morton Heger, Leo Wanta, George Reig, Captain Morris (ONI), Tom Heneghan (see below), and a group of bankers and leading derivatives traders who operate in the shadows and have in the past been so ‘powerful’ that the Treasury would even call upon them for ‘assistance’.

ANATOMY OF MBS-CDO-CDS FRAUDULENT FINANCE OPERATIONS
In our report dated 8th February 2009, we reported that the NSA had interfered with our production computer and had stolen three pages from our imminent analysis by Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., under the generic heading ‘The Legalisation of Financial Corruption’ in which we analyse in detail the precise steps of the Ponzi finance operations – and in which we demonstrate both that the derivatives have no value, and also that this ‘mystery’ is encased in a fog of jargon so dense that outsiders (such as the CNBC correspondent) never get to to understand what is going on.

The segment stolen from our production computer also contained the chart in which we show that the Paulson TARP operation represented a fraud designed to inject fictitious, fabricated value into worthless ‘Structured Products’ using taxpayers’ money so as to enable the speculators to ‘start over’ – with the top ‘insiders’ such as George Bush Sr., Carlyle and Carlyle Capital and James A. Baker III especially benefiting from the Government bailout operation.

Before we go any further, we need to repeat the sections that were stolen from our production and the introduction, in order to place this back into context:

NSA STEALS ICR TEXT PROVING TARP WAS A SCAM TO REFUND CARLYLE, BUSH ET AL.
On 5th February, the Editor was working with his colleague to finalise pages for the next issue of International Currency Review. This contains an analysis by Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., with 3 diagrams, entitled ‘THE LEGALISATION OF FINANCIAL CORRUPTION’, that carefully demonstrates and proves that the Paulson Treasury’s TARP operation represented a colossal Ponzi-style fraud designed to refund Carlyle, Carlyle Capital and corrupt ‘insiders’ starting with George H. W. Bush Sr., James A. Baker III and other highest-level US financiers of terrorism.

All of a sudden, our screen became completely unstable under the impact of electrical pulses which can only have been directed externally. There were two attacks: on the first occasion, the relevant pages were retrieved without loss. About 20 minutes later, however, a further pulse attack resulted in the ‘loss’ of the concluding pages, associated with the final diagram which shows:

(a) How the Henry M. Paulson Treasury had concocted a devious false prospectus programme to inject false value into fraudulent and worthless derivative ‘Structured Products’ and:

(b) How this process, thanks to the fact that the Treasury now controlled the FNMA (‘Fannie Mae’) and FHLMC (‘Freddie Mac’) directly, would ensure that the Government bailout money agreed by Congress would refund Carlyle, Carlyle Capital, Bush Sr., James Banker II et al., as stated above.

We therefore publish immediately below the precise text that was stolen by the NSA in the course of this second ‘pulse attack’. We were of course able to restore the stolen text, plus the concluding chart showing the scam in graphic form, almost immediately, so nothing was achieved except that the forces concerned obtained a copy of the language we are using.

They therefore knew that we were about to expose the TARP Ponzi scam, although they would have known that anyway since they listen in to all our telephone conversations.

• Reference is made in the text below, to the diagrams, which are not shown here (because this platform does not currently support illustrations).

• But it is necessary to include these diagram references in order to reveal why NSA stole this text by directing electrical pulses at our production computer. This is the text they stole:

HOW THE LEGISLATION ASSISTED THE FINANCIAL FRAUDSTERS:
THE PAULSON TREASURY’S TARP $700 BILLION PLATFORM SCAM
Figure 3 opposite illustrates the process of taking the private mortgage, commercial mortgage, credit card loans, and/or any other fungible debt, and via the underwriting group or underwriting trust pool, and turning that debt into a securitised ‘Structured Product’ to be pooled and sold into the global institutional market place.

The boxes indicating ‘Pool A-1’ etc. represent the securitised pools of mortgages and other ‘assets’, and the various tranches of these ‘Structured Products’.

These tranches and/or pools are then sold on to the banks, investment banks, and ‘financial products’ companies for re-sale and/or re-packaging and then re-sale to international banks, investment banks, and corporations.

US Treasury Secretary Paulson’s TARP plan to obtain unlimited authority over the $700 billion was premised on the basis that via a reverse auction, the ‘Structured Products’/derivatives could be purchased by the Treasury TARP group and re-packaged, via the new FNMA and FREDDIE MAC, and then re-sold at a profit.

BASED ON THE FALSE PRESUMPTION THAT THE ‘ASSETS’ HAVE VALUE
This operation assumed that the illiquid derivatives have a specific value or a market value.

Such an assumption is definitely false, since there is NO actual and specific asset that is directly attached to the ‘Structured Product’ – given the obvious fact that the asset was split from the locally filed UCC-1 that defines who is the mortgagee and mortgagor, and who has legal claim to the asset once the mortgage or debt is paid in full.

IN OTHER WORDS, holders of these fake, fraudulent exotic ‘assets’ have no recourse to the original underlying source(s) of ‘real money’ funds.

This separation of the asset and the legal authority to claim the asset occurred during the financial securitisation process of pooling, re-pooling, and re-packaging – supposedly (for gullible public consumption) to spread the risk of default to as many holders as possible – thus furthering the development of the Credit Default Swap derivatives market.

The typical CMO (‘Structured Product’) has ‘A’, ‘B’, ‘C’, and ‘Z’ tranches, representing fast pay, medium pay, and slow pay bonds plus a tranche that bears no coupon but receives cashflow from the collateral remaining after all the other tranches are satisfied. More sophisticated CMOs have multiple ‘Z’ tranches and a ‘Y’ tranche incorporating a sinking funds schedule. [This passage in the printed version references the earlier discussion, not reproduced here].

Figure 3 illustrates a non-public TARP program, prior to the appointment of Mr. Kashkari, et al. and the Congressional Oversight Panel restrictions.

Under the guise of a government ‘bailout’ theme and marketed to Congress and the US general public as being for the purpose of buying the illiquid asset-backed securities, Treasury Secretary Paulson intended to operate TARP as a Trading Platform – that is to say, as an International Hedge Fund benefiting from US Government Guarantees – from within Treasury (behaviour which has hitherto been completely illegal) to purchase, at a higher price than necessary, the CDO, CDS, MBS etc. derivatives from the very entities and banks that have themselves directly contributed to the mass-production and sale of these toxic illiquid ‘Structured Products’. The purpose of this Trading Platform was/is therefore to use public funds to quantify the value of the toxic products, and to overpay the holders, i.e.: the likes of leading Fraudulent Ponzi-Finance specialists such as: AIG, CITIBANK, GOLDMAN SACHS, CARLYLE CAPITAL, CARLYLE GROUP, and others.

BECAUSE, once the ‘Structured Products’ had been valued, via reverse auction, and purchased, Paulson and his friends would then be able to re-pool and re-package the relevant derivatives via FNMA and FHLMC for re-sale into the demonstrably gullible marketplace, where the phrase ‘due diligence’ appears to be foreign to many operators in the market – thereby repeating the process for as long as possible. Profits from this Trading Platform could then be transferred to an unknown Master Custodial Account set up within the huge external international monetary system – such as a receptacle set up for this purpose by President George W. Bush Jr. in Benin, West Africa – without the knowledge of, or any accountability to, the US Taxpayer, the US tax authorities, or anyone else.

CONCLUSION
Thus, PUBLIC funds were to be used yet again to generate PRIVATE accruals, while a massive fraud would be concealed under cover of the necessity of ‘managing’ the illiquidity of the avalanche of toxic ‘Structured Products’ and regaining credit flow within the international banking system. See the flow charts: Figures 1-3 herewith. ENDS.

[Note: This text will appear on pages 32-34 of International Currency Review, Volume 34, #2].

THE DIAGRAMS TO BE PUBLISHED WITH OUR PAPER
As indicated above, the exposure of the ‘Structured Products’ frauds in the forthcoming issue of International Currency review is accompanied by three charts [Figures 1-3]. Each chart carries a very bold notice stating:

‘THERE IS NO RECOURSE TO UNDERLYING CASH FLOW AFTER ‘A’’, where ‘A’ represents here the Mortgage issuing banks which are in receipt of cashflow from the mortgagor (the party taking out the mortgage)

• Description of Figure 1 [Page 25]: MBS-CDO-CDS SCAM FLOWCHART:
The Fraudulent Finance Non-recourse Carousel:
STEPS SHOWN ON THE CHART:

(1) The borrower makes payments to the Mortgage issuing banks.

(2) The crucial Universal Commercial Code [UCC – 1] document is lodged with the local Courthouse Land/Deed Recorder [Land Registry in England]. The Mortgage banks retain control/custody of the UCC-1 document which does not ‘travel’ with the subsequent transactions. T

he Mortgage banks have the continuing benefit (excluding defaults) of the real money cash flow from the borrower/mortgagor.

• The Mortgage banks obtain new money by on-selling the mortgage to investment bank pools or the FNMA or FHLMC [see (3) immediately below]. They have now been paid twice (although they sell the mortgage on at a discount. When they do so, an egregious deception occurs.

Because the Mortgage banks retain control of the crucial underlying document, the UCC-1, and/or the Land/Deed papers, they are actually selling NOTHING at all, UNLESS they are actually engaged in committing ‘visible’ fraud by on-selling ANOTHER TOP COPY OF THE UCC-1 or else the Land/Deed papers. The fraud here may be achieved by the borrower being required, in many instances, to sign THREE TOP COPIES of the relevant documents, without the TRUE reason for this fake ‘requirement’ being spelled out (‘FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT’). Whether this occurs or not, the following legal hazards arise in this context:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD: Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”.
Sourced from: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, Fifth Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”.
Sourced from: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, Fifth Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

THEFT BY DECEPTION:
• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.
Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:
• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.
l “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.
Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Ed

(3) The Mortgage banks sell mortgages either into Investment Bank Pools or into Trust Pools of the Federal National Mortgage Association [FNMA, ‘Fannie Mae’] or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation [FHLMC, ‘Freddie Mac’] which, since 8th September 2008, lost their Government-Sponsored Enterprise (GSE) status after being taken over wholesale by the Treasury.

• The Mortgage banks are also basically ‘indifferent’ (in a ‘normal’ market environment unlike the prevailing situation) as to whether the borrower ultimately defaults or not. If the borrower defaults, the Mortgage bank is now in the real estate business and acquires the property which it then sells (third payment). On top of this, since the Mortgage bank has retained full control over the UCC-1 document, which does not ‘travel up the derivatives chain, it is in a position to on-sell a ‘derived’ mortgage on the basis of that document, generating thereby a FOURTH payment (from the same mortgage), and at the same time ‘starting over’.

(4) The Investment Bank Pools operate an Underwriting Group and a Buying/Selling Syndicate, and undertake ‘securitisation’, packaging or re-packaging of pooled (or collectivised) securities. The FNMA and FHLMC Trust Pools operate an underwriting Trust Pool, a Buying/Selling Syndicate and create ‘Securitisation Pools’ and develop[ Mortgage-Backed Security packaging and Pass-Through Securities – pools of fixed-income securities that are backed by a package of assets. A servicing intermediary collects monthly payments from issuers and, after deducting a fee, remits or passes them through to the holders of the Pass-Through Security.

This device is also known as a ‘Pass-Through Certificate’ or a ‘Pay-Through Security’. The most common type of pass-through is a Mortgage-Backed Certificate, whereby ‘homeowners’’ payments pass from the original lending bank through a Government agency or investment institution to the investors. This is the ONLY exception to the general rule that there is NO RECOURSE to underlying real cash flow after the borrowers’ payments into the Mortgage banks themselves.

(5) The chart shows ten representative US domestic pools which sell the repackaged securities or ‘Structured Products’ to Goldman Sachs, A.I.G., Lehman [defunct], Morgan Stanley, Citibank, JPMorgan Chase, Wachovia, with some pools selling direct to General Electric or foreign banks, such as Coutts. At the lower right corner of the chart is the rubric: ‘From the U.S. institutions the scam is taken international…’.

This references the fact that, for instance, Goldman Sachs will sell the repackaged ‘Structured Products’, however marketed, for instance, to Deutsche Bank, Barclays and the Bank of England, while Lehman [defunct] sells to Natwest, as does Morgan Stanley. Meanwhile the ‘Structured Products’ or securitised pooled ‘assets’ have long since been DECOUPLED FROM the original underlying cash flow of the mortgager borrower(s), so that the only ‘value’ attached to the packages is derived from the NAMES of the institutions marketing them.

As a disillusioned former Goldman Sachs officer informed the Editor recently, the derivatives ‘are worth what someone is prepared to pay for them’.

Now that they have been exposed as intrinsically worthless, the only parties who will pay anything for them are those compartmentalised zombies who have not yet understood that there has been a fundamental discontinuity which cannot be ‘made good’ or denied.

Figure 2 [Page 27] provides a close-up of the right-hand side of Figure 1, showing how a single loan triggering one solitary cash flow of mortgage payments is typically leveraged and intermingled with other such cashflows into exotic ‘derivatives’ known as ‘Structured Products’ via pools which are sold on to investment banks before being marketed internationally, where the US securities legislation (the 1933 and 1934 Securities Acts) does not apply.

Figure 3 [page 33] follows the funds paid to the US investment banks for the on-sold ‘Structured Products’ by the foreign institutions (Deutsche Bank, Barclays Bank, Bank of England, Natwest and Coutts, in the illustrations) and by General Motors, Ford Motor Company and General Electric (as illustrated), which invest them with Carlyle, Carlyle Capital and other ‘top’ hedge funds and ‘private equity’ entities such as those whose representatives attended the ‘Goldman Sachs Roundtable’ meeting on 10th February and benefiting insiders such as George Bush Sr. and James A. Baker III*.

A placard on Figure 3 reads: ‘PURPOSE OF TARP OP: TO INJECT VALUE INTO WORTHLESS ‘STRUCTURED PRODUCTS’, AND THEN ‘START OVER’’.

Meanwhile, since ‘Fannie Mae’ and ‘Freddie Mac’ are now controlled directly by the Federal Government (the Treasury), they re-pool and repackage ‘fresh’ ‘Mortgage-Backed Securities’ (‘Structured Products’), enabling the process to begin again. The chart proclaims at this point;

• START OVER: and the selling into the market ‘starts over’.

So Carlyle, Carlyle Capital and the other hedge funds and ‘private equity’ entities repurchase the newly created Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBSs), CDOs (Collateralised Debt Obligations) and CDSs (Credit Default Swaps) from the market for purchase by the US Treasury under the TARP scheme using (in the case illustrated) the Paulson TARP bailout money for the purpose.

This procedure reliquefies Carlyle, Carlyle Capital and the other hedge funds and ‘private equity’ entities by generating a flow of cash from the Treasury into their accounts.

An explanatory box labelled ‘How the TARP scam to refund worthless toxic ‘Structured Products’ to benefit the above* was supposed to operate. It all went horribly wrong’, positioned at the lower right-hand corner of Figure 3 explains further:

• STEP ONE: Assign [False – Ed.] value to Mortgage-Backed Securities, Collateralised Debt Obligations and Credit Default Swaps and other derivative ‘assets’.

• STEP TWO: Purchase funds: First to Carlyle et al.

• STEP THREE: Carlyle et al.: Repurchase derivatives from the market and onsell them to Treasury under the TARP program.

Postscript: The TARP scheme is thus SPECIFICALLY shown, with the assistance of these diagrams which will appear on pages 25, 27 and 33 of International Currency Review Volume 34, #2, to have represented an operation concocted by the corrupt Paulson Treasury, to refinance and revalue the worthless derivatives trash ‘assets” and to refinance Carlyle, Carlyle Capital etc. – whereas it was fraudulently marketed to Congress and to the American population as a bank bail-out programme which was also intended to alleviate the mortgage ‘crisis’. It represented, therefore, a fraud on the United States Government, the American people and the whole world.

The new version of TARP under President Obama, marketed as an economic stimulus bill, has the same primary objective as the TARP scheme. It is NOTHING to do with resolving the crisis and, like Geithner’s incoherent and immediately discredited proposals, will be seen to represent another fraud – probably a fraud too far.

Significantly, the Chinese authorities were reported on Friday 13th February to have informed Mrs Hillary Clinton, whose own involvement in criminal financial operations they of course know all about, that if the United States is to receive further Chinese investments in US Treasury securities, the US Government will need to guarantee all preceding Chinese investments in US dollar assets. In other words, the Treasury must provide and insurance wrap or guarantee for Chinese investors, including the Chinese Government.

• Translated into the vernacular, this riposte represents a Chinese official black eye or raspberry for Mrs Clinton and the Geithner Treasury; or to be more precise, the Chinese have told the US Secretary of State, who removed $500 million from Bank Crozier in Grenada, to GET LOST.

FAT CAT BRITISH BANKERS SO SORRY THEY LOST THEIR OWN MONEY
If after killing ten people while driving under the influence of alcohol you say to the policeman who is arresting you ‘I’m ssh-sho shorry, offisher, I couldn’t sh-shee where I wash going’, the fact that you have apologised to the policeman will not prevent you being arrested and cuffed, hauled off to a police cell, breathalysed, dragged into court, remanded in custody, put on trial and sentenced for grievous bodily harm and manslaughter, after losing your driving license.

However if you are a British banker and a big mason as well, and you have spent two decades presiding over banking fraud in which your institution has enthusiastically participated, you are liable to imagine that you can apologise’ profusely in order to avoid the consequences of your criminal behaviour – while spattering your fake apologies with gratuitous references to the fact that you personally have lost millions and are much poorer as a consequence of the fact that your bank frauds have been found out. Further, when analysed, your apologies are discovered not to represent personal apologies at all, but merely ‘regret’ at the ‘turn of events’.

That these creatures live in a cocooned world of legitimised corruption was confirmed when, as the Financial Times reported on its front page [11th February 2009], four previously ‘top’ British ‘Fat Cat’ bankers made the following arrogant statements to Members of Parliament:

• Lord Stevenson, Former chairman of HBOS: ‘We are profoundly, and I think I would say unreservedly, sorry at the turn of events… All of us [Fat Cats] have lost a great deal of money’.

Translation: We are not sorry for our participation in the Ponzi frauds. What we are sorry about is that our Fraudulent Finance operations came unstuck, as a consequence of which we personally have lost a huge amount of money. It’s a shame because we were all doing so well before the discontinuity, weren’t we.’.

• Andy Hornby, former Chief Executive of HBOS: ‘I don’t feel I am particularly personally culpable … I have lost considerably more money in my shares than I have been paid’.

Translation: ‘All I care about is that I have personally lost money. I couldn’t care less that as a direct consequence of my own participation in the Fraudulent Finance derivatives scams, I have brought the whole world to the edge of ruination’.

• Sir Tom McKillop, former chairman of Royal Bank of Scotland: ‘We bought ABN Amro at the top of the market. So anything we paid was an error. Everything we paid, basically, has not been worth it. In fact, we are sorry we bought ABN’.

Translation: ‘I’ll fob them off with this bromide so that they don’t get round to asking me why on earth we bought ABN Amro, because if they were to ask me that, I would have to reveal that we bought ABN Amro in order to obtain control of a vast portfolio of secret accounts containing stashed accruals generated through Fraudulent Finance operations that we were lusting after’.

• Sir Fred Goodwin, former Chief Executive of Royal Bank of Scotland: ‘I could not be more sorry for what has happened. But I’ve invested a lot in RBS… it’s of great distress for me to see what particularly my colleagues are going through’.

Translation: ‘However I am not going to mention that I presided over the construction of a huge campus for my bloated institution using the proceeds of dubious Fraudulent Finance transactions, and neither shall I be making any reference whosoever, if I can get away with it, to the fact that we plastered Caribbean airports with garish posters encouraging investors including by definition agents handling the proceeds of CIA-developed drug-trafficking operations, to park the funds they control with Royal Bank of Scotland’.

BARCLAYS BANK’S FALSE BALANCE SHEET
Luckily for the Show Trial bankers on display, none of the MPs on the investigating Committee asked the key question: what was the source of the funds you were playing with?

Likewise, when the institution regarded by experts as even more corrupt than Royal Bank of Scotland, Barclays Bank, suddenly announced on 9th February that it had expanded its balance sheet over the preceding 12 months by £900 billion, so that Barclays’ assets and liabilities both mushroomed to more than £2.0 trillion, NO-ONE in the media bothered to ask Barclays about its source of funds. The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the United Kingdom is about £1.4 trillion.

The ‘source of funds’ issue was passed off on the basis that the bank had acquired hundreds of billions of dollars of derivative positions alongside the bank’s acquisition in September of the North American ‘assets’ of Lehman Brothers.

Obviously, if Barclays Bank were to fail – dismissed as an ‘unlikely event’ on the 10th February 2009 by The Times’ Banking and Finance Editor, Patrick Hosking – the size of Barclays’ balance sheet would have serious repercussions for British taxpayers and would destroy the creditworthiness of the British Government. But is it really ‘unlikely’ that Barclays Bank, stuffed with worthless assets that it values fraudulently at full fake value, might fail?

ON FRIDAY 13TH FEBRUARY, LLOYDS TSB’S SHARE PRICE COLLAPSED BY 35%. In the evolved context, there is no such thing any more as a bank that’s TBTF (‘Too Big To Fail’) because, on the basis of fraudulent valuation, such prospectively failing institutions now have balance sheets that exceed the total value of the host country’s Gross Domestic Product by an order of magnitude.

It’s stupid to suggest that such failures are ‘unlikely’ when the glaring reality is that as a direct consequence of their decades of playing Ponzi, these banks are all technically bankrupt.

Barclays Bank is a puff fish: its balance sheet was puffed up by $900 billion of fake ‘assets’ that have no value [see below] which the bank says have value and which its accountants corruptly certify as having value. The auditors for Barclays Bank had better be well protected by adequate insurance against being sued by an army of scammed depositors and others when it transpires that this institution is in fact bankrupt and that the British authorities cannot possibly bail it out.

• The same now applies to Lloyds TSB.

WHY WE WERE TOLD TO ‘COOL IT’ ON CRITICISING BANKERS
Meanwhile, in our report dated 25th January 2009, you may recall that we ran some paragraphs under the heading ‘BRITISH MINISTER CALLS FOR CORRUPT BANKERS TO BE ARRESTED’.

Specifically, we referenced a front-page report in the Times of 24th January 2009, in which Lord Myners, the Brown Government’s Minister for the City of London, was reported to have demanded the arrest and indictment of British bankers engaged in Fraudulent Finance practices [see, for instance, above]. The newspaper had reported inter alia as follows:

‘A furious onslaught on banking’s “Masters of the Universe” has been unleashed by Mr Gordon Brown’s City Minister. Too many bankers fail to realise they are grossly over-rewarded and have no sense of society… Lord Myners says that the banks have been mismanaged, and [has delivered] the strongest attack [by UK officials] so far on those responsible’.

‘Lord Myners says that there will have to be fundamental changes in the way that banks operate and that ‘the golden days of huge bonuses in the investment banking arms are gone…’.

‘He calls on banking boards and shareholders to stamp on the reckless behaviour of bosses and adds’ – crucially, which is why we quoted this – ‘that if people have committed crimes, they should be prosecuted’’.

We then added the following elaboration:

‘In view of the fact that we have been reporting arrests of bankers until we are blue in the face (with more reported below), this outburst, late in the day as it is, represents evidence that the too-slow-to-come-to-its-senses UK official sector has at long last been shocked into the realisation that this is a CORRUPTION CRISIS first and foremost’.

‘ALL RESPONSES SHOULD BE BASED ON THIS PREMISE, rather than on the more palatable presumption that this is ‘simply’ a systemic global financial crisis of the utmost gravity’.

In our report dated 30th January 2009, under paragraphs headed ‘ATTEMPT TO GAG US FROM REPORTING UK FRAUDULENT FINANCE DEVELOPMENTS’, we stated:

‘… A few days ago, the Editor was asked: would we hold back on any further comment arising from Lord Myners’ belated observation, reported in the preceding analysis, that those engaged in the FRAUD in the banking sector in Britain should be prosecuted.

‘We were about to add that the Conservative Party leader, David Cameron, interviewed on Sky News on 26th January, elaborated:

‘We need to look at the behaviour of banks and bankers, and where such people have behaved inappropriately, that needs to be identified, and if anyone has behaved criminally, in my view, there is a rôle for the criminal law/ I don’t understand why in this country the regulatory authorities seem to be doing so little to investigate it, whereas in America, they are doing quite a lot’.

On 10th February 2009, The Times’ columnist Rachel Sylvester kindly unravelled the conundrum surrounding the question of why the Editor was suddenly asked to ‘hold it’ with reference to further elaboration of Lord Myners’ entirely correct warning that criminal bankers should be prosecuted. In her article entitled ‘Labour can’t control the pinstriped puppets’, she wrote:

‘Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary, was less than pleased when Lord Myners, the City Minister, launched an onslaught against the “grossly over-rewarded” Masters of the Universe last month. “A key part of New Labour was to recognise the importance of wealth makers”, a certain Government aide says. “A big tactical error would be to unleash a lot of anti-banker rhetoric”’ (3).

Ah, so NOW we know we know why we were requested, via the MI-6-X-Y-Editor transatlantic loop, to ‘go easy’ on criticisms of bankers, and especially on suggestions that those British financial sector executives believed to have been engaged in criminal Fraudulent Finance should be prosecuted.

The source behind this request was none other than the intelligence operative Lord Mandelson himself. Lord Mandelson, it appears, is not at all keen that banking executives should be punished for their financial crimes: so he let it be known that the Editor should be informed accordingly.

A COUPLE OF PERTINENT ‘PERISH THE THOUGHTS!’
Whether this means that Mandelson reads our website, and whether it further implies that he is under pressure from a certain powerful a sponsor, is something that we won’t need to go into at this juncture: no doubt this aspect of the matter, like everything else, will ‘come out in the wash’. But for the time being, Heaven forbid that a British Minister of the Crown should be interfering in the legal process by becoming actively engaged in discouraging justified calls for these heads of criminal financial enterprises, past and present, to be prosecuted for fraud. Perish the thought!

It cannot possibly be the case, either, that when, as Chancellor of the Exchequer, Gordon Brown appointed Dr Alan Greenspan as an adviser, the frequently arrested Dr Greenspoon was actually employed to advise the then Chancellor on how to PREVENT the lid blowing off the London-based derivatives Ponzi scamming pressure cooker, on behalf of his mentor and fellow criminal finance Godfather, George H. W. Bush Sr., and his co-conspirator and partner in these giga-financial crimes Tony ‘Rollover’ Blair, can it? Perish that thought as well.

• A correspondent writes from the United States to inform us that his mother, who lives in Ruislip, Middlesex, bought an apartment outright (for cash) on a 125-year lease, with no mortgage.

But in March 2004, she obtained a short-term loan from Northern Rock which, as we know, was extensively engaged in Fraudulent Finance operations, with a Clinton-linked subsidiary operation out of Jersey, Channel Islands. When the lady paid off the loan, in less than three months, she then requested that the lease documents used for collateral purposes be returned to her from Northern Rock. The bank informed her that they could not locate the documents.

She wrote letters to Northern Rock, who responded that they would arrange for copies to be sent from the Land Registry. The lady said that she did not want copies, but the originals. Northern Rock stated that they did not hold the originals, even though they had taken the originals as collateral for the loan. The poor lady then complained to the Banking Ombudsman, who proved to be completely ineffective (suggesting that the UK Banking Ombudsman is there to protect the UK criminal banks involved in this activity, rather than the customer). In the end, the lady obtained two copies of the lease documents from the Land Registry (in December 2004 and March 2005).

The correspondent requested our help: and although we simply cannot take on ‘cases’ (since we receive several such distressing cases with a request that we investigate them every month from the United States), in this sole instance we responded that if we were provided with the relevant underlying correspondence, we will take the matter up with Northern Rock, with the suggestion that if the new Government-sponsored management of this institution persists with the stance that they cannot now retrieve this person’s original lease documents, we will then expose the nationalised Northern Rock as remaining complicit in these evil fraudulent finance operations under the British Government’s protection based upon the corrupt alienation of underlying property documentation. We now await receipt of the relevant correspondence.

SNAPSHOTS OF PONZI CRISIS FALLOUT IN BRITAIN AND EUROPE
Meanwhile the fallout from exposure of the Fraudulent Finance practices continues to reverberate across Europe. A snapshot of some developments on 11th to 13th February under this heading will illustrate that multilingual chickens are coming home to roost:

• City of London:
Half a dozen financial services businesses in the City were reported on 11th February to be under investigation by the Serious Fraud Office SFO), which is equipped with a new Director, Mr Richard Alderman, who has replaced previous management considered by the Editor of this service, from first-hand experience of the SFO’s failure to investigate manifest frauds committed by a European Commission-linked British firm, to have been duplicitous and compromised. Whistleblowers have reportedly drawn the SFO’s attention to the activities of colleagues and others; and the SFO’s own lawyers are said to be coordinating their inquiries with the Financial Services Authority and the City of London Police. The SFO is also using US-style ‘swat teams’ in City fraud investigations.

Additionally, it was revealed on 13th February (The Times, London) that Terry Freeman, né Sparks, a Director of GFX Capital Markets was detained by a specialist unit of the City of London Police at his Essex home on Monday 9th February 2009. A source was quoted as telling the newspaper that ‘the Police are looking to see if he was a mini-Madoff. There are elements of a Ponzi scheme but what they have to determine is whether the business became that after it got into trouble or else whether it was a Ponzi all along’.

• However OUR question is more to the point: Is this one of the ‘ten Madoffs’ waiting to blow in Europe, referenced in the preceding report?’

Freeman’s fund ceased trading in January 2009, leaving hundreds of clients who had invested between £5,000 and £500,000, chasing their money to no avail. Freeman-Sparks set up GFX in 2004.

Unsurprisingly, trouble started precisely in SEPTEMBER 2008 (the $14.0 trillion was, you will recall, placed into ‘lockdown’ on 12th September 2008: the Editor received the ‘triple gunshot voicemail’ on the following Saturday), when GFX’s clients were suddenly unable to obtain new statements and were prevented from withdrawing their funds. The postings on Mr Freeman’s ‘Trader’s Diary’ blog became erratic and many clients became anxious after finding they could not contact the principal.

The firm suspended its operations immediately ahead of the Madoff arrest, on 3rd December 2008.

A message written by a ‘concerned investor’ posted on Mr Freeman’s blog reads: ‘Terry is being investigated by the City of London police for fraud, money-laundering and unregulated trading. The offices in London are no longer manned’. Police confirm that Freeman has been interviewed with respect to allegations of money laundering and potential offences under the Financial Services and Markets Act, but has been released pending further enquiries.

• British Government:
A few days ago, the British press revealed that Sir James Crosby had resigned as Chairman of the Financial Services Authority which is supposed to be aggressively investigating City-wide Financial Ponzi-model fraud, after he was accused of having sacked a senior HBOS executive who had been warning of excessive risk-taking at HBOS and that the bank was shattering all the known rules of commercial banking behaviour and prudence. The sacked executive, in a memorandum to a House of Commons Committee, noted that his many conscientious warnings were sternly rebuffed, and that there was a sterile culture of ‘not rocking the boat’ and ‘don’t tell me what I don’t want to hear’ at the banking entity which has since been taken over by Lloyds TSB, in an unwise move which has severely weakened that institution and its reputation.

On 13th February it was further revealed in the British press that an American, Glen Moreno, the Director and Chairman of the newly established entity set up by the Brown Government called UK Financial Investments, which is supposed to preside over and supervise the progress of how the Government’s bank bail-out money is used, had resigned from his new post (which he only took up a few weeks earlier) amid allegations that a Liechtenstein institution with which he has links is (of course) involved in tax evasion operations.

The resignation followed Treasury questions in the House of Commons, during which the highly respected and skilled Conservative MP, Michael Fallon asked: ‘Can it really be right that the body looking after the taxpayers’ interest… should be chaired by Mr Moreno who appears to have been so heavily involved in tax dodging in Liechtenstein?’ It has transpired that Mr Glen Moreno was a trustee of Liechtenstein Global Trust (LGT), a private bank accused of facilitating large-scale tax avoidance. A former employee at LGT, Heinrich Kieber, revealed the existence of secret offshore accounts held by tax-evading US politicians and others in the United States and other countries.

• Belgium:
Shareholders in Fortis rejected a state rescue plan to carve up the banking and insurance group, defying Belgian Government warnings that Fortis will face total collapse. On 11th February, Belgian Ministers convened an emergency meeting to try to prevent the dispute bringing down yet another coalition Government, following the collapse in December of the Belgian Government led by Yves Laterme over the handling of the nationalisation of Fortis, Belgium’s largest single employer. More than 5,000 angry shareholders roared with delight as their votes blocked a plan to sell part of the Fortis Group to BNP Paribas, another huge institution which is up to its neck in Fraudulent Finance, with the Belgian state taking control of Fortis’s lending operations. Shareholders had won a court case to delay the Belgian Government’s blueprint for the carving-up of Fortis until they had been consulted. The Belgian Finance Minister, Didier Reynders, said that the entire enterprise would face bankruptcy if the shareholders blocked the deal. The total liabilities of Fortis are equivalent to four times Belgian Gross National Product. The interest rate spread between Belgian official debt and German Bunds soared by 125 basis points on fears that the Belgian Government may have to take over the liabilities of Fortis, further undermining the creditworthiness of the Belgian state. Again, these liabilities the false values attributed to the trash ‘assets’ on Fortis’ balance sheet.

• Ireland:
The latest banking scandal to break in Ireland concerns the discovery by Government-appointed investigators that Irish Life & Permanent had transferred more than six billion Euros billion £5.4 billion) of deposits to the books of the Anglo Irish Bank very shortly prior to the end of the bank’s financial year, only to withdraw the exact same amount some weeks later. Most of the funds were deposited on the final day of the bank’s most recent financial year. Moreover the bulk of all these deposits were placed just hours after the Irish Government had announced a guarantee to insure all deposits and debt liabilities held at Irish banks. The Finance Minister, Brian Lenihan, says that he was aware of certain unacceptable practices, including the transfer from Irish Life, when the decision was made to nationalise the bank.

Given these shady practices, the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement and the financial sector regulator have initiated investigations into these transactions, which may result in criminal proceedings: Lord Mandelson, please note. The Irish Defence Minister, Willie O’Dea, elaborated:
‘If it transpires that Anglo Irish, or any bank, was artificially building up its deposits to give a false picture of its financial health, that would be very, very, very serious’.

• European Commission:
A leaked memorandum prepared for the EU Finance Ministers (ECOFIN) was reported to have warned that the so-called ‘toxic’ debts of European banks risk overwhelming some of the weaker EU ‘Member States’ and ‘may’ [sic] present a systemic danger to the overall EU banking system. Countries which the authors of the document appeared to have in mind are those with bloated banking systems, namely: Ireland, Britain, Belgium, Netherlands, Austria, Sweden and a non-EU country, Switzerland. Some crucial passages from this document have surfaced, including:

‘Estimates of total expected asset writedowns suggest that the budgetary costs of asset relief could be very large both in absolute terms and relative to Gross Domestic Product’.

‘For some Member States, it may be the case that asset relief for banks is no longer an option, due to their existing budgetary constraints and/or the size of their banks’ balance sheets relative to GDP. The extent of any possible risks to the European Union’s banking system as a whole from an inadequate response in these Member States needs to be considered’.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S DELUSIONS ABOUT ‘ASSET RELIEF’
It will have been noted here that the European Commission is looking at ‘asset relief’ as though this is a viable policy – when what is actually implied here is that the false values of the fundamentally valueless derivatives ‘assets’ are supposed to represent actual liabilities which the governments in question might be called upon to honour.

This is a strategy of certain ruin in an environment that is also destroying the fabric of Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) and its add-on provisions. For instance, contrary to all EU norms, the Irish budget deficit is projected to reach 12% of GDP in 2010, with the equivalent measures in both Spain and the United Kingdom expected to reach 10% of Gross Domestic Product.

All three countries have been ‘enronised’ and used as ‘trading platforms’ by the Bush Sr.-Clinton Greenspan organised criminal Fraudulent Finance Ponzi derivatives offensive.

SWISS RE SCRAPS ITS DERIVATIVES OPERATION COMPLETELY
On 12th February 2009, the world’s largest reinsurer, Swiss Re, dispensed with the services of Jacques Aigrain, its Chief Executive, a former JPMorgan investment banker, who had shifted the organisation into risky derivatives operations. Swiss Re announced a record full-year trading loss of SwFr1.0 billion (£602 million) after announcing a week earlier that it was scrapping its investment bank altogether. That entity traded ‘Structured Products’ such as Credit Default Swaps (CDOs), triggering a writedown of SwFr6.0 billion (£3.6 billion) for the full year in question.

Swiss Re pointedly replaced M. Aigrain with Stefan Lippe, an insider, who previously headed the group’s property and casualty and life and health underwriting divisions. In other words, the entity placed a veteran professional reinsurer into the outgoing CEO’s slot, signalling that it would be reverting exclusively to its core business, and would have nothing more to do with derivatives.

Note that the dismissed CEO who took Swiss Re on a derivatives wild goose chase, came from JPMorgan. Translation: Swiss Re not only closed down its so-called investment banking operation, but also reflected the true position, by VALUING THE DERIVATIVES ‘ASSETS’ AT ZERO.

• This is the kind of evidence of the worthlessness of these fraudulent assets, that cannot be ignored, even by derivatives market ideologues,

• FACT: Many of the colossal losses being logged by financial institutions reflect the fact, which is never reported, that they are ACTUALLY engaged in purging their books, or those of subsidiaries, altogether of the fraudulent derivatives ‘assets’ which were previously reported to have value, but which, since the discontinuity, have been seen to be worth nothing at all.

• ANOTHER FACT: One reason this is happening is that accountancy firms (auditors) do not relish the prospect of being sued for negligence in having signed off on accounts containing fraudulent valuations of derivatives ‘assets’ – given the general climate that has arisen due to the concrete discontinuity, in which it is now universally recognised that derivatives have no value and can no longer be fraudulently passed off as though they do.

WORST PROSPECTS FOR BRITAIN SINCE 1931
In announcing that Britain faces its steepest downturn since the postwar years of 1945 and 1946 and its worst peacetime contraction since 1931, with real Gross Domestic Product expected to contract in real terms by 4% year-on-year in 2009, the Governor of the Bank of England, Mervyn King, warned on 11th February that unless the British Government and policymakers worldwide succeeded in ‘bringing the banking crisis to an end’, the consequences for the UK economy could be even more severe. Mr King added:

‘The United Kingdom economy is in deep recession. The length and depth of the recession will depend to a significant extent on developments in the rest of the world, where a severe economic downturn has taken hold’.

• No measures have been taken that can bring the banking crisis to an end.

On the contrary, all the measures that have been taken are precisely the reverse of what needs to be done, being predicated on the basis of the false assumption that the ‘toxic derivatives assets’ have value, and can be revalued with the new (false) values fixed, which is a fanciful pipedream as Mr Geithner is discovering for himself.

GOVERNMENTS UNABLE TO HANDLE HUGE INSTITUTIONAL COLLAPSES
By extension, and as can be seen from the above, governments are panicking in the face of a general expectation that they will indeed become progressively (or suddenly) liable to guarantee and therefore honour the liabilities of the recalcitrant criminal enterprise banks.

Against this background, they have embarked upon a desperate policy of printing money, a.k.a. of quantitative easing, to balloon the money supply, and to expand government debt on a scale with no precedent, thereby effectively ensuring a ‘wheelbarrow’ future.

Instead of adopting this ill-advised and manic non-strategy, the governments concerned should do what the Group of Seven financial powers agreed to do at their meetings in both 2007 and 2008, and which they have so far FAILED to do.

• That policy is spelled out in the section entitled THE SOLUTION.

Governments have failed to implement the strategy that the G-7 agreed upon in 2007 and 2008 because they are fearful of the big criminal enterprise banks and of the powerful traders and intermediaries that wish to continue the Fraudulent Finance carousel operations, as though there had been no discontinuity – in order to recoup the funds they lost in dancing to the enticing tunes played for them by Godfather Bush Sr. and his sorcerer-in-chief, Dr Alan ‘Bracelets’ Greenspan.

And behind this sabotage lies the factor identified earlier – namely, the criminal finance intentions and covert self-financing practices of the US ‘State within the State’ which controls the Executive Branch, selects its leading figures, and has usurped the power of the Executive.

In order to sustain this position, the CIA, controlled by the Bush-DVD faction inside the Intelligence Power, has seen to it that its Fraudulent Finance Ponzi operations have been exported to as many counterparties abroad as the external platforms that have been compromised can muster.

By enticing so many swarms of flies into its web the Bushspider operating out of the George Bush Center for Financial Terrorism has attempted to preclude the discontinuity that has actually taken place – namely, exposure of the fact that these transactions are ALL FRAUDULENT.

The US Treasury’s cack-handed attempt to perpetuate the fraud, by having the corrupt Federal Reserve fund exotic new US Treasury instruments (or ‘Geithners’) ‘enhanced’ with an insurance wrapround and a deceitful Treasury ‘good health’ label, has both invited ridicule and drawn global attention to the relevance of Mervyn King’s warning that the situation will deteriorate sharply ‘if the world’s policymakers fail to bring the banking crisis to an end’.

There is, and has always been, ONLY one way to bring the global banking crisis to an end: and that is to implement, without further obtuse delay, the Refunding Programme for the US dollar and world trading system agreed upon by the Group of Seven Financial Powers in 2007 and 2008:

• See under SOLUTION, above.

MADOFF UPDATES
Following the revelation that Mrs Ruth Madoff removed about $15.5 million from a Massachusetts brokerage firm operating as a Ponzi scheme ‘feeder’ funnel into the Madoff giga-Ponzi enterprise during the three weeks prior to Bernard L Madoff’s arrest on 11th December 2008, it has emerged that a far larger number of people than previously envisaged, have been scammed and/or affected by the Madoff dimension of the George Bush Sr. global financial corruption nexus.

According to Court documents filed by the Massachusetts securities regulators, Mrs Ruth Madoff withdrew $5.5 million from Cohmad Securities on 25th November and a further $10 million on 10th December. This information is detailed in two wire transfer receipts filed by Mr William Galvin, the Massachusetts Secretary of State.

These wire transfer orders represent the first open evidence that any member of Madoff’s family was assembling cash immediately before Madoff ‘confessed’ on 11th December that he had been running a gigantic ‘Ponzi scheme’ for years. Mr William Galvin seeks to revoke Cohmad Securities’ registration in Massachusetts for failing to cooperate with his investigation.

This State filing coincided with US Federal prosecutors being granted another extension, to mid-March, to file an indictment or present evidence against Mr Madoff. The Financial Times reported on 12th February 2009 that ‘Mr Madoff’s attorney and prosecutors have been in discussions about a “possible disposition” of the case, according to a Court document filed on 11th February. This could mean that prosecutors and the defence are attempting to work out a deal before trial. Mr Madoff has already agreed to a partial settlement with civil authorities’.

These developments reek of an ‘insider stitch-up’, as trailered by this service in our earlier report on this subject. The forthcoming issue of International Currency Review, Volume 34, #2, contains facsimiles of the early Madoff Court case documents obtained by the Editor from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York during his pre-Christmas visit to New York, with a great deal of related background information.

On 13th February, Bloomberg reported that Mr Madoff’s defence attorney, Ira Sorkin, may have a conflict of interest in defending his client because the lawyer’s parents invested with Bernard L. Madoff until 2007. Madoff’s Ponzi operations are thought to have functioned as early as the 1970s.

An IRA (Individual Retirement Account) opened by Sorkin’s father was inherited by his mother in 2001. When his mother died in 2007, the IRA was cashed out. Joan Meyer, a former prosecutor who is now a partner with Baker & McKenzie LLP, said:

‘If one of his close family members was the recipient of that money and essentially benefited from that fraud scheme, it’s something that an attorney would clearly have to consider’. The Wall Street Journal reported that the account was divided between Mr Sorkin’s sons, Roger and Peter.

Ms. Meyer elaborated that defendants who sign waivers for their lawyers in such prospective conflict-of-interest cases and who are later convicted, have been known to claim that the waiver was obtained without sufficient information or was sought in respect of conflicts that cannot be waived, potentially leading to what Ms. Meyer called “a litigation issue in the future”.

Sorkin’s name and those of his parents appeared on the 162-page list filed in the US Bankruptcy Court in Manhattan [see our alphabetic listings, reports dated 6th February 2009]

Other links between Sorkin and Madoff over the years have also been dredged up recently.

All we would say at this stage is that this state of affairs may, we suspect, turn out to be ‘extremely convenient’ for Madoff in due course, and comparably ‘embarrassing’ for the US Government.

• On purpose?

OUR SUSPICION OF A STITCH-UP IS SUPPORTED BY ANOTHER SOURCE
The Editor’s early published suspicion that the Madoff crisis was vulnerable, given the drafting in of certain ‘connected’ attorneys, to being ‘stitched up behind closed court doors’, and our earlier allusions to the reality that the Madoff Ponzi operation was linked to the Bush-Clinton-Chicago organised crime Octopus are supported by the following excerpt from Wayne Madsen’s WMR website (dated 9th February 2009):

‘The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that it had cut a deal with $50 billion Ponzi scammer Bernard Madoff whereby Mr Madoff will neither admit nor deny fraud claims against him in a suit brought by the SEC. In return Madoff has agreed to pay civil fines and penalties levied by the SEC. The agreement has no bearing on Madoff’s criminal trial’.

‘WMR has learned that in addition to 20 million documents stored by Madoff in a warehouse in Queens that were stored without any indexing system and merely placed in boxes and strewn around the floor, are millions of additional documents that were stored by Madoff in a Brooklyn warehouse that was partially flooded. A number of Madoff documents there were destroyed by water damage’.

‘WMR has also learned that a key element in Madoff’s Ponzi scheme was Madoff Energy LLC, formed as a Delaware corporation in February 2007. Other Madoff firms in the energy arena were Madoff Energy Holdings LLC, Madoff Energy III LLC, and Madoff Energy IV LLC. There are links between these now-defunct Madoff energy entities and Texas oil and natural gas industry interests, some close to the Bushes and Dick Cheney’.

‘WMR has also learned that the kid glove treatment given by Federal authorities to Madoff, including allowing him to remain in his Upper East Side luxury town home, is because Madoff’s Ponzi scheme was part of a much larger operation, one involving top officials of both the George W. Bush and Barack Obama Administrations, as well as the notorious Russian-Israeli Mafia’.

• JUST AS WE INDICATED EARLIER.

CRUDE CIA BLACKMAIL THREAT AGAINST MI-6
The Madsen report dated 9th February 2009 also contained a veiled threat of CIA blackmailing operations against the British Government which we understand to be a further dimension of the bitter intelligence war and stand-off between the threatened US Intelligence Power and the British intelligence services centred around the issue of The Queen’s LOAN funds.

The veiled threat is interpreted by us as a deliberate provocation by the beleaguered CIA which is resisting the inevitable implementation of the G-7 – Approved Refunding Programme because of its fear that it will then lose key sources of illicit finance which are the fountainhead of its usurped power over the Executive Branch and what it has hitherto considered to be its unchallengable US and worldwide hegemony.

Madsen, who is widely used to run ‘trailers’ of what the CIA and its affiliate entities have in mind, and whose service also specialises in ‘breaking’ connections that certain US forces want ‘out there’ for their own reasons – and who has, significantly, NEVER alluded to our reports, indicating that his service may engage in selective reporting – referenced the controversy surrounding the detention and brutal treatment in Gantanámo of Binyamin Mohamed, whom Madsen INCORRECTLY claimed to be an Ethiopian citizen when in reality he is a British citizen, and whose lawyers have demanded that the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office turn over 42 classified documents that reveal how Mohamed was tortured, renditioned between Afghanistan, Pakistan, Morocco and Cuba which, Madsen reported ‘may also shed light on the British Government’s involvement in kidnapping and torture’.

The source elaborated:
‘WMR has learned that the CIA, with the support of the Barack Obama Administration [sic! The CIA CONTROLS the Obama Administration], is threatening to release details of other British abductions and torture if London proceeds to reveal details of the kidnapping and torture of Mohamed’.

The report then went on to spell out what blackmail cards the CIA thinks it holds against MI-6, which has the power and responsibility (see our earlier reports) to procure the implementation of the Settlements and the Refunding Programme.

The following package represents a crude, typically CIA-style blackmail threat:

‘Specifically, the CIA is in possession [how on earth does Madsen know? – Ed.] of potentially embarrassing details of the abduction and torture by Britain’s MI-6 intelligence service of 28 Pakistanis abducted by British agents in Athens after the July 7, 2005 transit bombings in London’. The report continued to elaborate on this matter in a tone which can only be described as very threatening, concluding with the following:

‘With suspicions growing that Milliband [British (Jewish) Foreign Secretary] and Prime Minister Gordon Brown are involved in a major intelligence cover-up, any US disclosures about Britain’s rôle in renditions and torture, violations of international and European law, could result in a further erosion of support to Labor in Britain…. If the British Government reveals details of Mohamed’s rendition and torture by the Americans, it can be expected that there will be a mutually-assured destruction campaign waged between Washington and London’.

The only problem with this barefaced blackmail threat is that a British Judge had already ruled – but in furious language, prompting superheated exchanges recently in the House of Commons – that the relevant information about the Americans’ brutal treatment of Mohamed would NOT be released for unspecified security reasons ‘and in order to preserve the essential confidences inherent in the intelligence relationships between the two countries’, or verbiage to that effect.

The British Foreign Secretary (Miliband) then elaborated at great length in Parliament about why the information would not be released.

• In other words, Madsen’s belated CIA blackmail threat was sterile, beyond its expiry date and empty – suggesting that the CIA was scratching around looking for some further pretext to exert pressure on the British, given the stand-off over the G-7-Approved Refunding Programme which it is systematically blocking.

• A pretty feeble operation, which was flattened when the British authorities saw through the CIA’s typically sordid blackmail attempt.

IN MEMORIAM
William Foxton OBE, a distinguished British Army officer, who rose from the ranks in the Green Jackets regiment, lost his arm in combat, and worked for United Nations missions, the French Foreign Legion and the Sultan of Oman, shot himself in the head on 10th February 2009 (not 1983) after losing his life’s savings in the Bush-Madoff Ponzi operation.

Major Foxton killed himself in a park near his home in Southampton. His son, Willard, 28, said of Madoff and associates:

‘They have got my father’s blood on their hands’. The retired soldier had invested some of the money he had earned while serving the Sultan of Oman, in two hedge funds that were rolled into Madoff’s scheme, and had lost ‘a six- or seven-figure sum’, according to Mr Foxton Jr.

‘Essentially I want Madoff and others to know that they have my father’s blood on their hands. I’m very angry. My first thought was to show up at Madoff’s trial in New York and throw my father’s medals in his face’.

If there is a trial, that is: right now, our early suspicion that the Bernard L. Madoff scandal and its reverberations were liable to be stitched up behind corrupt court doors by corrupt US lawyers trying to cover up for George Bush and the Clinton Chicago FBI and the other financial gangsters behind this corruption, looks as though it may have been right on the mark.

REACTIONS TO OUR REVELATION CONCERNING MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S.
In the preceding report, dated 8th February 2009 we revealed for the first time that Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., is instructed to proceed with the Group of Seven-Approved transparent Dollar System Refinancing Capital Markets transactions on the basis of the $6.2 trillion of LOAN funds provided mainly by Her Majesty the Queen designed to generate taxable REVENUE on the books, thereby refloating the banks ON BALANCE SHEET.

This information was published because it had finally become clear that, despite all the reiterated promises, undertakings and assurances from behind the scenes that the G-7-Approved Refunding Programme would proceed as instructed by the lender(s), these undertakings had turned out to be as worthless as the trash derivatives ‘Structured Products’ that have been exposed as fraudulent and without any value, as is universally accepted. Previously it had been considered appropriate NOT to divulge this information – publication of which apparently came as a shock to certain parties who remain hell-bent on continuing the discredited Ponzi scamming operations.

As a direct and immediate consequence of that revelation, several responses were forthcoming:

• 1: SCURRILOUS LIBEL ATTACK AGAINST COTTRELL AND HIS CORPORATION:
First, Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., was subjected to a series of deliberately libellous assertions and innuendos in a website posting on 11th February 2009 by an operative called Tom Heneghan. We deal with this matter in the final section below. The purpose of the careless libel attack was to try to discredit Mr Cottrell and his firm Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., given that (see below) the Obama Administration is using the ‘SMOKE AND MIRROR MONEY’ generated by illicit means and contrary to the lenders’ and owners’ instructions off the back of the $14.0 trillion, to ‘reboot’ not the American economy (as is claimed) but first of all, the internationally and domestically discredited fraudulent derivatives sector for the benefit of all parties involved in this financial corruption.

• 2: CRUDE CIA BLACKMAIL THREAT AGAINST MI-6:
Secondly, a separate, crude CIA blackmail threat as described above was deployed in a clumsy manner to exert pressure on MI-6, within this overall context. Other ongoing, unspeakable CIA blackmail operations perpetrated by US intelligence cadres against targeted figures in Britain are known to the Editor of this service.

• 3: DIVERSIONARY ARTICLES ‘REPLACING’ G-7 BY INEFFECTIVE G-20:
Thirdly, all of a sudden, articles started appearing, coinciding with a meeting of Group of Seven Ministers in Rome on 13th February, suggesting that the G-7 was a spent force and that ‘the action’ would come from the Group of Twenty (G-20) who are scheduled to meet on 2nd April. The purpose of this new ‘angle’ was to discredit the G-7-Approved Refinancing Plan.

This line was pushed, in particular, in a Bloomberg article by Simon Kennedy, which kicked off with the following inaccurate statement:

‘The Group of Seven, whose finance chiefs convene this weekend in Rome, is ceding its traditional power to rebuild the world economy to a broader body of governments that now wield greater sway over global growth’.

Among the ‘authorities’ cited for this diversionary ‘line’ was Paul Martin, the former Canadian Prime and Finance Minister, who was reported to have told Bloomberg: ‘The G-20 reflects the realities of the global economy. Its Finance Ministers are becoming the dominant policy-making body’.

Also cited was none other than Gordon Brown, the British Prime Minister, identified earlier as having impeded the Settlements and the Refunding, who said on 9th February: ‘You cannot talk about the world economy and what you want to do without involving a whole range of countries’.

However the former American Treasury official John Taylor, who is now a Professor at Stanford University, contradicted all this by stating, accurately, that the G-7 can ‘still get things done better’ because it is smaller, involves only major economies and is monitored closely by investors. As for Joseph Stiglitz, the former Chief Economist with the World Bank and a former adviser to President Clinton, he of course pushed the G-20 line: ‘It’s effectively recognition by the G-7 that they don’t have the money. The money is in Asia, the Middle East’.

But the Group of Seven have permission to deploy the $6.2 trillion provided pro bono publico mainly by Her Majesty The Queen for transparent on-the-books taxable REVENUE generation to refloat the banks and thus the US and world economies, and they also command the means of implementing this strategy thanks to instructions referencing the Refinancing Programme, which require Capital Markets transactions to be conducted using the appropriate instruments by and through Michael C. Cottrell’s Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. investment banking firm.

Further, the notion that the G-20 can agree on anything PRACTICAL in this crisis is, in this Editor’s 38 years’ experience of observing these international platforms, eyewash. The G-20 powers can never agree on much, and can rarely implement anything effective: G-20 is just a talking shop.

And as indicated above, the Chinese have specifically informed Mrs Clinton that their terms for any further Chinese investments in US Treasuries entail the provision of a wrapround guarantee for all preceding Chinese financial investments – which, in translation, means that they informed the US Secretary of State that the Chinese will be pouring no more dollars down the corrupt US Treasury black hole – which, by further extrapolation, is another way of saying:

YOU HAVE NO SAY IN THE MATTER. WHAT HAVE YOU TO DO WITH US?

• A sentiment from which no sane and informed observer can dissent.

• 4: USE OF ‘SMOKE AND MIRROR MONEY’ DERIVED FROM THE $6.2TRILLION ETC:
In the fourth place, and crucially, passage of the ‘stimulus bill’ represents a pre-planned substitute for the use of HM The Queen‘s money to reboot first, the fraudulent derivatives sector, and only secondly, the US economy.

As noted above, the money allocated for this purpose is ‘SMOKE AND MIRROR MONEY’ generated from the illicit exploitation of the previously referenced $14.0 trillion (including the $6.2 trillion of LOAN funds provided mainly by The Queen), which were placed into ‘lockdown’ on 12th September 2008, following actions taken, we can now finally reveal, by Mr Cottrell and this service (which was why the Editor received the ‘triple gunshot voicemail’ message on the following Saturday morning).

The intention, therefore, is to deploy the illegally generated funds to kick-start the fraudulent derivatives sector again – notwithstanding the realities that it is now universally recognised that these fake ‘assets’ represent the products of a gigantic Bankers’ Ramp, and that institutions as prominent as Swiss Re are writing their derivatives exposures down to zero.

The so-called ’stimulus bill‘ is intended, first and foremost, to BY-PASS USAGE OF THE QUEEN’S LOAN FUNDS which had to be placed out of reach on 12th September 2008 because they were being misused by the banks, hedge funds and so-called ‘private equity’ funds that have been engaged for years in this Fraudulent Finance Ponzi-model activity.

The primary purpose of the ‘stimulus bill’ is the same as Paulson’s corrupt TARP scam, which was designed to refinance Carlyle, Carlyle Capital and friends, as described in the foregoing exposure with diagrams, to be published in the forthcoming issue of International Currency Review.

We can therefore state without fear of contradiction that the US Legislative Branch is co-conspiring with the US Treasury and the Obama White House to PERPETUATE THE DERIVATIVES SCAMMING FRAUDS by seeking to re-start the Ponzi scams following the discontinuity that has taken place (4).

Will this FRAUD succeed?

It cannot succeed. The Chinese, who have hard cash-cash dollars, will not purchase the degraded instruments that the US Treasury will be marketing.

Will other governments and parties that have had their fingers burned want to buy ‘Geithners’ or whatever ‘products’ are now to be concocted on the basis of the ‘stimulus bill’ that President Obama was expected to sign on Monday 16th February, on his return from Chicago where he will have been talking to certain circles with a vested interest in these matters?

What do you think?

OBAMA ADMINISTRATION SELECTS THE WORST OF ALL POSSIBLE WORLDS
So, because the US Government, under Mr Obama as under Bush II, will not agree to the SOLE SOLUTION [see above] TO THE CRISIS THAT HAS BEEN ON THE TABLE FOR SEVERAL YEARS, the United States and the Rest of the World are now condemned to suffering the very worst of all possible worlds – all in order to satisfy the greed and lust of a small clique of corrupt operatives, financiers and others who defer to the determination of the Intelligence Power to retain its control over the US Executive Branch as described above.

Hence Michael C. Cottrell’s request for the instructions pertaining to his stated responsibilities to conduct transparent Capital Markets operations in accordance with the G-7-Approved Refinancing Plan, to be applicable out of London, using the LOAN funds provided pro bono publico by HM The Queen for the purpose, in accordance with the Group of Seven’s long outstanding and hitherto sabotaged requirements.

THE LIBELLOUS ATTACK ON MICHAEL C, COTTRELL, B.A., M.S.
As noted above, the US securities expert Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., and his investment banking firm Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., were subjected to a deliberate, violent, scurrilous, libellous and desperate attack by an operative called Tomas P. Heneghan, whose address is reportedly 532 W. Jefferson Avenue, Naperville, IL 60540-5219.

• Heneghan is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc.: mailing address: 2 N. Riverside Plaza, Ste 800, Chicago 60808-7882.

On 28th December 2007, Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc. contributed $2,300 to the Hillary Clinton for President campaign. [Source for all this detail: CampaignMoney.cpm/political contributions/thomas-heneghan]. In the past, the Editor of this service was fed diversionary lies about this operative by an agent seeking to persuade us that Heneghan ‘works for George Bush Sr.’.

On the contrary, this operative worked with Leo Wanta and David Williams and was involved with the Clintons and Al Gore. The libellous attack on Mr Cottrell and his corporation, consisting of smears and innuendos unsupported by any evidence, was specifically timed so as to follow the revelation in our preceding report of Michael C. Cottrell’s standing with regard to the instructions referenced above concerning the Group of Seven-Approved Refunding Programme on the basis of the $6.2 trillion of LOAN funds provided for the purpose pro bono publico and ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’ by the lender.

The objective of the attack was to smear Michael Cottrell and his corporation ahead of the Senate’s passage of the ‘stimulus bill’ which, instead of deploying these LOAN funds for the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme ON THE BOOKS to refloat the banks in a proper manner, would instead apply the ‘SMOKE AND MIRROR MONEY’ generated by illicit means inter alia through the irregular exploitation of the LOAN funds prior to their placement into ‘lockdown’ on 12th September 2008.

As reiterated above, the LOAN finance was placed into ‘lockdown’ because it was being corruptly misused in contravention of the instructions and purposes for which the funds were loaned, as a generous discretionary contribution to rescuing the world economy from the fate to which the Bush and now the Obama Administrations have perversely consigned it.

This attack was laughable in the sense that it is said of Mr Cottrell, by the kind of people we are having to expose, that ‘you can’t trust Michael Cottrell. He’s too honest’. However the libels and lies stepped beyond tolerable boundaries: and for this reason, first, the Editor agreed with Mr Cottrell a response to a request from a website for an interim statement; and secondly, Mr Cottrell prepared an Affidavit for publication on our website platform and for filing in Court [see below].

Both of these responses are now displayed. This was such a serious and gratuitous attack that Mr Cottrell has been left with no choice, except that he will not descend to the Heneghan level.

The attack also impugned the integrity and loyalty to the United States of Colonel Dana Wilcox.
The Editor has met this gentlemen and can state that among the information that he holds about him is included the fact that he has handled vast sums of money on behalf of Uncle Sam and has never ’touched a cent‘ – unlike other figures mentioned in our reports. Colonel Wilcox would probably not wish the Editor to have made this statement here, but in our view it succinctly summarises in one sentence the level of distinguished integrity applicable.

THE EDITOR’S INTERIM STATEMENT
At 5:43pm on Friday 13th February, the Editor‘s interim statement of rebuttal was posted by agreement (at the website’s request) on http://www.rumormillnews.com

The text of that statement is as follows:

(1) Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., is at his residence and office in Erie PA.
He has not been arrested.

(2) No warrants have been issued for the arrests of Michael Cottrell and Colonel Dana Wilcox and no investigations of either of them have been undertaken or are intended

(3) Your communication has been forwarded to the Badges.

(4) Aspects of the matter have, I understand, been vigorously dealt with by authorities behind the scenes.

(5) Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., may be contacted on 814 455 9218. Anyone calling him must identify themselves fully.

(6) All other assertions in the referenced Heneghan segment, with which I am familiar, are also totally false.

(7) The scurrilous attack by innuendo represents a response by Wanta, who remains a convicted felon, to our revelation for the first time, in the recent report, of the status of Mr Michael C. Cottrell B.A., M.S., with respect to the G-7-Approved Refunding Programme.

(8) I have been briefed on the matter in detail and will add substantially to this rebuttal of these scurrilous lies and libels in the forthcoming report, which is currently in preparation.

Christopher Story FRSA, London, 13th February 2009.

MICHAEL C. COTTRELL’S SWORN AFFIDAVIT IN RESPONSE TO THE ATTACK
At 8:46pm London time on 12th February 2009, Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., faxed the following sworn Affidavit to the Editor, for inclusion with this presentation. The Affidavit is structured for prospective filing at the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria, by Colonel Dana Wilcox in the near future.

Colonel Wilcox and Michael Cottrell are understood to require a comprehensive retraction of the libels and lies about them perpetrated by Mr Heneghan against them. The text of the Affidavit forwarded to the Editor is as follows:

I, Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., as President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., do hereby swear and affirm the following facts –

That [I] refute and demand legal proof supporting the allegations presented by Mr Tom Heneghan, International Intelligence Expert, within “The Warrant Issued for Greenspan Madoff-Gate Update” [posting at:] (http://blog.myspace.com/tom_heneghan_intel), dated February 11, 2009…

ALLEGATION #1:
“P.S. WE CAN ALSO REVEAL TONIGHT THAT WARRANTS HAVE ALSO BEEN ISSUED FOR THE ARRESTS OF EAST GERMAN STASI DVD-U.S.-CIA AGENT AND EX-NAZI [sic], COLONEL DANA WILCOX, ALONG WITH FORMER LEO WANTA COLLEAGUE MICHAEL COTTRELL”.

(1) Upon notification of this series of allegations by Mr Heneghan, on February 12, in a phone call with the authorities – between approximately 7.30 a.m. EST and 7:32 a.m. EST –

I was advised that the allegations are not true, no such warrants have been issued for either Mr Wilcox or myself – further, there is no investigation of us.

I demand Mr Heneghan show proof of said warrants issued, by whom, to whom.

ALLEGATION #2:
“BOTH WILCOX AND COTTRELL RECENTLY TRIED TO ILLEGALLY REPRESENT THEMSELVES AS REPRESENTATIVES OF AMBASSADOR LEO WANTA IN REGARDS TO IMPLEMENTATION AND SETTLEMENT OF THE WANTA-REAGAN-MITTERRAND PROTOCOLS”.

(2) Per notification to the Department of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Virginia dated 31 March 2008, that since Mr. Lee/Leo Wanta has dismissed Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., from any and all activities relating to AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.

• that all notices of taxation matters be referred to Mr. Lee Emil Wanta, 396-6726, Shareholder since May 20, 2004, at 715-864-6956/715-726-1097, or diplomat_switzerland@msn.com or at 13093 77th [Avenue] Chippewa Falls, WI 54729-6285;

• Registration change Request: 23 March 2008, AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., 13093 77th Avenue, Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin 54729-6285;

• that all documents forwarded to ANY entity since 23 March 2008 have been under the authority of Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., President and CEO of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.;

• Mr Dana Wilcox is neither a part nor an employee of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.;

• Neither Mr. Wilcox nor Mr Cottrell – since 23 March 2008 – have or will ever represent a convicted felon named Leo/Lee Emil Wanta or AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.;

I demand Mr Heneghan show proof of such an instance.

ALLEGATION #3:
“AT THIS HOUR, COTTRELL AND WILCOX HAVE BEEN ACTING AS COLLECTION AGENTS FOR THE BRITISH MONARCH QUEEN ELIZABETH IN REGARDS TO A $6.2 TRILLION LOAN GIVEN BY HER MAJESTY TO FORMER WHITE HOUSE OCCUPUNK GEORGE W. BUSHFRAUD”.

• This is such an outrageous statement that any American can place themselves as “collection agents” for Her Majesty –

I demand Mr. Heneghan show the proof of said allegation.

ALLEGATION #4:
“BOTH COTTRELL AND WILCOX REPRESENT A NOTED MONEY LAUNDRY CALLED PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, WHICH HAS BEEN LINKED TO THE BERNARD MADOFF PONZI SCHEME…”.

As President of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., located at 1157 West 7th Street, Erie, PA 16502 – 814-455 9218 –

I demand that Mr. Heneghan provide any U.S. FEDERAL ATTORNEY that will substantiate this slanderous statement – WHERE IS THE PROOF – NO U.S. ATTORNEY has EVER stated or implied that Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. is or has EVER been linked to Bernard Madoff or any of the BUSH-CLINTON-MADOFF schemes;

A copy of this affirmation shall have the same effect and force as an original.

I, Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., President of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., located at 1157 West 7th, Erie, PA 16602, United States Passport No. 205125335, do hereby swear and affirm that the above statement is true and factual.

[Signed]
Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S.
President
Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

12 February 2009.

References and Notes:
(1) ‘And he spake a parable unto them, Can the blind lead the blind? Shall they not both fall into the ditch?’: Luke Chapter 6, verse 39.

(2) Rachel Ehrenfeld told the Editor in October 1999 that she and a girlfriend were present in a women’s accessories boutique at the Rockefeller Center when, all of a sudden, 18 presidential security personnel rushed in and ordered everyone in the boutique to freeze. She and her friend were stranded in the middle of the floor. Shortly afterwards in walked President Bill Clinton, who proceeded to order something or other for one of his female ‘acquaintances’. Ms. Ehrenfeld told the Editor that the next few minutes felt like the best part of half an hour, and that she had never, in her whole life, experienced such an unpleasant atmosphere. She said that the vibes around this man were deadly. Suddenly Clinton turned to her and his face went as red as a beetroot.

Then, the purchase complete, the President and his bodythugs evacuated the premises, leaving the other customers stunned. Rachel said she couldn’t get out of the place fast enough.

Two subsidiary points complete this story (which we have told here before, without naming the source): First, Clinton is of course the illegitimate son of Winthrop Rockefeller, so ‘shopping’ at the Rockefeller Center makes sense for him. Secondly, Ms. Ehrenfeld is a leading criminologist and told the Editor that she had debriefed some of the worst serial killers in America, in the GULAG.

She added that never, during such debriefings, had she experienced vibes anything like as bad as those surrounding President William Jefferson Clinton. This man and his wife are back in control of the US Government, on behalf of their patrons, the Bush Crime Family.

(3) The attempt by Lord Mandelson to smother criticism of British bankers’ appalling behaviour hit a brick wall when Patrick Hosking added this condemnation in an excoriating commentary in The Times, London, of 14th February 2009, entitled ‘Britain’s bankers plumb new depths’.

The commentary, with which we are in total agreement, read in part:

‘The spectacle of bankers continuing to award themselves bonuses while taking taxpayer support is feeding an extraordinary public rage and a fierce sense of injustice. With 40,000 people losing their jobs each month, it is a recipe for trouble, come the traditional rioting months of the summer’.

‘The seething sense of unfairness is almost palpable. The view that a small élite not only caused the crisis, but continues to profit at the expense of everyone else, is near universal’.

‘Gordon Brown’s promise of no rewards for failure in state-supported banks is looking ever more threadbare. We now know that Peter Cummings, the highest-paid individual on the HBOS Board, headed a division responsible for £7.0 billion of losses last year, yet he was still given a reported £660,000 payoff when he left in early January clutching his £6.0 million pension pot’.

‘The suggestion by Lord Myners, the City Minister, that some bankers simply have no sense of the broader society around them is getting harder to refute. To be preparing to pay out billions of pounds in discretionary bonuses over the next few weeks suggests an ignorance of the public mood and a single-mindedness bordering on the sociopathic’.

No doubt those who tried to pressurise the Editor this service to ‘cool it’ in reporting further on Lord Myners’ fully justified and long overdue observations on the filthy greed of these corrupt British banking types, will have read the foregoing passages in The Times. But just in case they didn’t, we reproduce them here for the record. All part of the service.

(4) Various American parties have sought to take issue with us over our presumed attitude towards President Barack Obama. Apparently we were supposed to have followed their example in abruptly ceasing to castigate outgoing President Bush Jr., and to switch to firing at the incoming President.

In order not to fall into this trap, the Editor invented the metaphor about jumping out of the frying pan and hovering in mid-air while it became clear whether we were to jump into the fire, or not.

Further, the Editor of this service is not a citizen of the United States, is a frequent guest in New York and elsewhere (having visited the country very frequently since 1977) and may be one of the best informed Englishmen in the world concerning the United States. It is clearly not for him to enter into sterile internal debates about issues relating to the new President, especially since it was unclear (for multiple reasons) how Mr Obama would develop in office, and what his priorities might be. The Editor was as disturbed as all other observers about the composition of the new US Administration, but still considered it appropriate not to descend to the mud-slinging level instantly indulged in by certain American observers. If they want to do that, it is their choice: but it is not for them to criticise the Editor for not joining in such activity.

The Editor is well aware of all the issues that have been raised under this heading. However he still considers it appropriate, diplomatic and plainly right to reserve judgement, while at the same time taking note of the fact that the new President of the United States is extremely polite and courteous at all times, which is more than could ever be said of his recent predecessors.

For this reason alone, the Editor considers that he should be allowed to remain the judge of what he may or may not write in the future about President Obama, in whom so much hope has been placed. The fact that Mr Obama has taken the wrong (and probably disastrous, for him) decision in allowing his personnel to place the impossible task of revitalising the decayed Fraudulent Finance sector at the top of his list for action, is a regrettable and prospectively catastrophic mistake.

But the Editor considers that the new President is still entitled, as current Head of State, to proper respect from a ‘foreigner’, especially a Brit.

And that’s where the matter rests.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.