SHARP INCREASE IN GLOBAL TENSION SINCE THE G-20

RELEASES SABOTAGED BY MERKEL, WHO IS THREATENED BY SARKOZY

Tuesday 7 April 2009 00:01

UNDERLYING ISSUES NOT EVEN MENTIONED IN THE COMMUNIQUE

• ‘NEW WORLD ORDER’ INVOKED FROM THE G-20 PLATFORM

• G-20 COMMUNIQUE SILENT ON THE CAUSES OF THE CRISIS

• EYES GLAZE OVER AT SIGHT OF OBAMA AND BROWN

• ‘FOR US THE WAR NEVER ENDED’, ETC

• GERMAN CADRES’ ANGER DIRECTED TOWARDS THE BRITISH

• SARKOZY AND MERKEL AT EACH OTHERS’ THROATS OVER THE RELEASES

• SARKOZY REPORTEDLY THREATENS MERKEL WITH ‘ELIMINATION’

• ELYSEE TREATY AND E.U. ITSELF THREATENED BY FRANCO-GERMAN BREACH

• BANKERS WHO STAND IN THE WAY POST-G-20 WILL BE ‘ELIMINATED’

• ROTHSCHILDS ‘DEALT WITH’ BY RUSSIAN AND CHINESE INTEL THUGS

• THE GERMAN-ORIGINATED ‘BAIT AND SWITCH’ ROUTINE

• U.S. POWER STRUCTURES MODELLED ALONG LENINIST LINES

• THE STRAIGHTFORWARD DRUG-TRAFFICKING TEST

• DRUG MONEY PROCEEDS AND THE INTERBANK MARKET

• THAT SEPTEMBER 2008 MONEY ‘LOCKDOWN’

• GERMAN MOLES INSIDE THE BRITISH OFFICIAL STRUCTURES

• CORRUPT TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS TO BE TAKEN OVER BY BRITAIN

• PROFESSORS CLIMB ONTO OUR BANDWAGON

• HYPOCRISY AND CANT IN THE G-20 COMMUNIQUE

• CRUCIAL FISCAL UNDERTAKINGS IN PARAGRAPH SIX

• THE PRIVATE MEETING BETWEEN THE QUEEN AND PRESIDENT OBAMA

• SUDDEN CHANGE OF LANGUAGE AT THE FED

• FED PUSH FOR EXEMPTION FROM STATUTORY DEBT CEILING

• FED NOW LESS CONCERNED ABOUT DEBT BECAUSE OF REFUNDING?

• THE POST-G-20 CIA ‘COLLAPSING’ OPERATION

• FULL G-20 COMMUNIQUE TEXT APPENDED AS NOTE 5.

• RECENT (OECD) TAX INFORMATION EXCHANGE AGREEMENTS APPENDED AS NOTE 6.

• MADOFF ‘VICTIMS’ LIST: Two reports were posted on 6th February 2009 containing the entire list of customers of Bernard L. Madoff Securities, Inc.. Because the list is so huge, we divided it into two segments: Clients A-N; and clients O-Z, plus a Miscellaneous Section. See: Archive. Our list is the easiest to load and clearest of the lists that have been reproduced privately on the Internet.

• We have just published: International Currency Review Volume 34, #2 on Systemic Fraudulent Finance and The Legalisation of Financial Corruption. Also just published are issues of our titles Economic Intelligence Review, London Currency Report, Interest Rate Service and Arab-Asian Affairs. For further details, please check the second white panel on the Home Page.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice is comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the Internet Security Solution software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

• DONATIONS: You can help finance these exposures (which the Editor has to prepare on top of his normal publishing responsibilities) by sending us a donation. Press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

• The CONTACT US facility is found in the red box throughout this combined website.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

• ‘NEW WORLD ORDER’ INVOKED FROM THE G-20 PLATFORM
Indicative of the supreme arrogance of the cabal of internationalists (globalists) who think they know best for the whole of humanity, the controlled British Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, inserted the keywords ‘New World Order’ in his tedious sermon at the Group of Twenty indulgence-fest on 2nd April. Manifestly, the intelligence operative who wrote that speech for him looks upon those who don’t sit on their brains with utter contempt.

It was Mr Gorbachëv (Orbach or Korbach) who recycled this World Revolution control-phrase in the late 1980s, and it was his clandestine ally, George H. W. Bush Sr., who trumpeted the phrase for the benefit of those whom Lenin called ‘the interested’ in the early 1990s.

The purpose of this gratuitous insult to our collective intelligence was to remind those whom Lenin called ‘the interested’ and their fellow-travellers that the G-20 bore-event was about progressing The New Underworld Order, by leveraging the consequences of years of purposely implemented Fraudulent Finance in the interests of the broader globalist agenda – a supposedly ‘Great Leap Forward’ towards an agenda that NOBODY in the world WANTS, beyond the tawdry confines of the controlled, self-important creatures who think they have a right to dictate how humanity should be directed, managed, destroyed, or all of the above.

G-20 COMMUNIQUE SILENT ON THE CAUSES OF THE CRISIS
The British taxpayer was reportedly lumbered with a bill for £50 million to pay for Brown’s globalist jamboree, which issued a Communiqué that conspicuously OMITTED any mention of the following keywords/phrases, thereby signalling with crystal cynical clarity that it did not address the issues underlying this criminal finance crisis:

• Derivatives or ‘Structured Products’

• Fraudulent Finance

• Criminal Finance

• Toxic Assets

• Legacy Assets

• Bribery

• Corruption

• Mafia/mafiya

• Tax evasion

• Drugs, drug-trafficking

• Inflation

• Hyperinflation

Thus the Communiqué SIDESTEPPED the issues that should have been discussed, in favour of bromides for the benefit of the gullible ‘mainstream’ media hoardes for whose ears the entire orchestrated charade was choreographed. The omission of ANY MENTION of these issues in the Communiqué reveals the total contempt of these people for the Press Room.

For days after this circus, the talking heads were still ‘analysing’ the ‘outcome’ of the G-20 meeting on the basis of the diversionary bromide-style Communiqué, thereby plastering the entire world with vacuous interpretations of what the ‘chosen’ operatives striding the revolutionary stage were imagined to have ‘agreed’ – without addressing the fundamental issues summarised above which are the keywords that these ‘analysts’ should have been searching for if they had been equipped with any discernment about what was going on.

• Update! Someone on The Times, London, has noticed that the Communiqué had NOTHING to say about Derivatives a.k.a. Toxic Assets a.k.a. ‘Structured Products’ a.k.a. FRAUDULENT FINANCE!
Writing in The Times, David Wighton argues that despite recognition by G-20 leaders that dealing with banks’ so-called ‘toxic assets’ is vital for the global recovery, very little was said about it in the official Communiqué. He adds: “Now that Mr Sarkozy and Mme Merkel have their crackdown on tax havens, perhaps they can show some leadership on more urgent problems”. [INCREDIBLE!!!!!!!!!!].

ACTUALLY, NOTHING WHATSOEVER was mentioned about Derivatives a.k.a. Toxic Assets a.k.a. ‘Structured Products’ a.k.a. FRAUDULENT FINANCE, because THEY ARE TRYING TO KICK-START THE CRIMINAL OPERATIONS and they don’t want the diverted press to focus on what they are doing. Furthermore, criminal operatives at the highest levels of Governments are vulnerable to EXPOSURE for their own participation in the ransacking of trillions of dollars.

•FACT: The REASON for the current ‘constipated’ state of affairs is that processes are in motion that threaten to entrap and expose VERY BIG NAMES; and everyone concerned is TERRIFIED that the lid cannot be forced down on the cauldron. That’s what the litigation referenced at the end of this report is all about, BUT IT’S MUCH, MUCH BIGGER than even the closest observers realise.

• MORE ARRESTS were reported to us in the afternoon of 7th April. This contradicts intelligence to the effect that anyone standing in the way will now, post G-20, be ‘eliminated’, but that does not preclude ongoing arrests of other co-conspirators and accessories to the fact of misdemeanours.
In fact, ‘liquidations’, we understand, have been ongoing for at least three weeks.

For (see below) the G-20 was a WATERSHED beyond which date the leeway shown to saboteurs in the past will no longer apply. It is surprising, perhaps, to hear of arrests still taking place. What is quite clear is that the Illuminati’s internal war, or the global financial intelligence warfare, has been ratcheted up to a much higher level of intensity. The G-20 event was probably the last time anyone on this foul stage crawling with rats is going to waste time trying to be polite. They had no choice on 1st-2nd April, because they were in the presence of The Queen, who is invariably very polite and is the epitome of good manners. But powerful operatives holding the highest official positions who have stolen vast sums of money and are desperate to avoid being exposed, are not about to waste time being polite, when they are so terrified of being fingered, and jailed for life.

EYES GLAZE OVER AT SIGHT OF OBAMA AND BROWN
The Editor had numerous better things to do than watch and listen to the wall-to-wall opinionated revolutionary internationalist propaganda drivel spouted by Gordon Brown, and has long since suffered from EGO (Eyes Glaze Over) at the sight of President Obama hogging yet another podium and lecturing the whole world, Fidel Castro-like, on what (unspoken) his DVD-CIA handlers want to eventuate. The arrogance of these controlled operatives who leverage power on the globalists’ stage is hard for normal people, let alone for jaundiced observers not accustomed to sitting on their brains, to tolerate.

But the silver lining here is that if these operatives continue thaumatroping (1) humanity with their sterile sermons, the whole world will soon be ‘switched off’ by this agitation, propaganda and self-regarding indulgence, which of course would be a Good Thing.

And indeed this is what will happen because if one fact is certain here, it is that these opinionated would-be jumped-up re-orderers of the world have no sense of proportion, no idea when they are overstepping the mark, and no inclination to cease and desist from their preaching of control-drivel for the supposed ‘benefit’ of humanity. Which of course is all very decidedly GERMAN.

The Dachau-based long-range Nazi strategic deception community behind the ‘globalisation’ thrust towards The New Underworld Order to procure German hegemony displays the one ineradicable characteristic of these people: an inability to know when to stop. This fatal characteristic was on display even as late as 1945, when Hitler was ordering his Generals to continue the War long after the remaining sparrows clinging to the few extant Berlin lamp posts knew that it had been lost.

‘FOR US THE WAR NEVER ENDED’, ETC
Which can remind us that the Nazi intelligentsia, who had decamped to the German Geopolitical Centre in Franco’s Madrid by 1942, were indifferent about the fate of Herr Hitler (Schickelgrüber), a criminal operative dredged up from the back streets of Vienna whom they regarded as expendable. On the contrary, they relished the post-Hitler prospect of implementing a sinister, gradualist long-range deception strategy epitomised by the phrase, found in the captured ‘Madrid Circular Letter’ (circa 1951): ‘Für uns ist der Krieg niemals vorbei’ (‘For us the war never ended’).

And as we have repeatedly elaborated, the other ongoing Nazi slogan of specific relevance to America’s predicament today was: ‘We shall build the Thousand-year Reich on the Ruins of the United States’ – a strategy expertly implemented by the DVD’s supremo in the United States, Dr Henry (‘call me ‘Henny’: no thanks) Kissinger, a disgusting quadruple agent who moved seamlessly from Princess Diana’s memorial service in Westminster Abbey to a nightclub that same evening where he was observed googling at a bellydancer.

President Obama despatched Kissinger and the Bush Family’s primary legal ‘fixer’ and former US Secretary of State James A. Baker III to Moscow in March to conduct discussions with the covert Soviets under Medvedev and GRU-Prime Minister Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin. They subsequently returned to the United States, it is believed, in the company of Gorbachëv, the former Andropov (Lieberman)-era head of the CPSU’s all-powerful Administrative Department and the chief long-range implementer of Andropov’s strategic deception strategy.

The use by President Obama’s handlers of Kissinger and Baker for this mission indicates rather clearly that the US political parties are of course two wings of the single Political Power – which is controlled by the ‘State within the State’ Intelligence Power under the heel of Bush Sr., directed in turn by the probable DVD supremo on the block, Dr Henry Kissinger.

It was this German Jew who persuaded the erstwhile pornographer Gerald Ford (a.k.a. Leslie Lynch King Jr.) to sack William Colby as Director of Central Intelligence and to instal, in his place, George H. W. Bush Sr., of like German Jewish background, thereby taking over the Central Intelligence Agency on behalf of the heirs of the Nazi Abwehr, Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst.

To ensure the ‘permanent’ allegiance of the CIA criminal enterprise (Bush Jr. referred to it as ‘our enterprise’) to the DVD, Bush Sr. later procured the renaming of the CIA’s Langley campus as the George Bush Center for Intelligence, which should read ‘George Bush Center for Terrorism’.

GERMAN CADRES’ ANGER DIRECTED TOWARDS THE BRITISH
Vituperative, uncontrolled fury emitted from certain quarters against The Queen and the British generally reflects anger at the reality that the Nazi DVD controllers are most decidedly NOT getting everything their own way ‘as we speak’. Some sources of these ignorant ventilations also fail to understand that France and Germany are basically interchangeable under the terms of the Treaty of the Elysée of 23rd January 1963, which is of INDEFINITE duration and specifically requires these two powers to reach quote ‘an analogous position’ unquote ahead of every international meeting involving both powers, in perpetuity.

Therefore, while Sarkozy and Merkel are at loggerheads (see below), they are simultaneously bound by the terms of that never-ending bilateral treaty, which is why they always pontificate IN UNISON against ‘the Anglo-Saxons’ (another piece of egregious nonsense) whenever one of these set-piece New World Order theatres is to be staged at some place near you (2).

SARKOZY AND MERKEL AT EACH OTHERS’ THROATS OVER THE RELEASES
Since the G-20 meeting, tensions between Sarkozy and Merkel are reported to have reached close to boiling point. We have been informed that President Obama did sign a document at that event requiring the releases to proceed – and that President Sarkozy was perhaps unwisely mollified by this development, so that he was able to set aside his earlier threat to implement his planned walk-out should the ‘deliverables’ not be forthcoming. That threat, it will be recalled, had been directed against the US President.

So one can imagine President Sarkozy’s unrestrained fury when he discovered, subsequent to the G-20 meeting, that Mr George Bush Sr.’s agent, Chancellor Angela Merkel, who has been bribed by Bush Sr. for about five years to stand guard over his accumulated ill-gotten gains stashed within the German financial system, has continued to stand in the way of the releases since 2nd April.

• STASI operative Merkel of course implements strategy and tactics dictated to her by the Nazi strategic deception continuum, Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst, Dachau, as well.

• SARKOZY REPORTEDLY THREATENS MERKEL WITH ‘ELIMINATION’
Given this stand-off, the apoplectic Sarkozy, who now hates the Bushes with a vengeance because (typically) he was double-crossed by George Bush Sr., is reported to have threatened Chancellor Merkel with ‘elimination’ if she continues to block the settlements, which is what she is reported to be doing. Specifically, Sarkozy is reported to have told the German Chancellor: ‘You have to do this, or you’re going to be gone’.

This huge breach between the Treaty of the Elysée partners has now become so extreme, that it threatens to scupper not just the 1963 bilateral Treaty of the Elysée, which is the foundation stone of forced ‘European unity’ itself, but also the cohesion of the German Nazis’ long-range entrapment strategy, the European Union Collective, which is based upon the structure mapped out in the Nazi document Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft (European Economic Community) published in Berlin in 1942, as previously (and repeatedly) reported by this service (3).

• ELYSEE TREATY AND E.U. ITSELF THREATENED BY FRANCO-GERMAN BREACH
The irony is that while Chancellor Merkel is implementing DVD blocking tactics, to sabotage the releases, she is also taking the risk that her intransigence in deference to the DVD and Bush Sr. will in fact rip the Elysée Treaty and therefore the European Union apart, thereby destroying the framework for German regional hegemony strategy – another instance of the German Nazi habit of always going too far.

A further irony here is that if Chancellor Merkel persists with her blocking behaviour, unless she is eliminated as Sarkozy has threatened, she will be doing us and the whole world an immense favour by perversely dismantling the insidious entrapment structure developed by the wartime Nazis and the German Geopolitical Centre in Madrid which has almost brought Britain to its knees.

BANKERS WHO STAND IN THE WAY POST-G-20 WILL BE ‘ELIMINATED’
The post-G-20 situation is meanwhile associated with a heightening of the intensity of the ongoing Illuminati bloodbath arising from this self-inflicted crisis. Hitherto this bloodletting has continued at a relatively subdued level, with banking sector saboteurs being ‘apprehended’ or arrested, rather than necessarily liquidated. But since the G-20 meeting, sanctions for any failure to cooperate as required have been sharply escalated. We understand that no leeway or mercy will now be shown, and that these sanctions are already being applied.

This is why we are now authoritatively advised that crooked bankers (and probably also corrupt Trustees) who sabotage any element of the post-G-20 financial release procedures will no longer simply be arrested, but will be ‘eliminated’ on the spot – by which is meant that they will be shot dead on sight, or else will be ‘zapped’ so that they suffer a heart attack.

Taken in the context of President Sarkozy’s reported threat that Chancellor Merkel will herself be ‘eliminated’ if her intransigence in blocking the settlements continues, we can now see that, post-G-20, the temperature and the level of international tension has been significantly raised – and that the G-20’s decisions are being perversely sabotaged by Germany.

This was probably inevitable, since tensions were already extremely high prior to the G-20 meeting, as witnessed by Sarkozy’s threat to walk out if the ‘deliverables’ were again impeded. So, having been through that ghastly meeting and having been deceived into believing that agreement to proceed with the releases had been reached, President Sarkozy feels bitterly betrayed by his own supposed ‘ally’, to whom he is supposed to be bound until the end of the solar system by the 1963 perpetual Treaty of the Elysée.

On the basis of past experience, this further satanic theatre of the absurd may just represent yet another instance of the dialectical game that these criminal operatives play, whereby yesterday’s identified villain is today’s beneficial influence, and tomorrow’s villain is a third party we hadn’t previously thought of. On the other hand, something tells the Editor that these new developments represent a very serious escalation of international tensions, exacerbated by fury at the objective fact that these ‘leaders’ assembled at great inconvenience and big expense to appear en masse in Canning Town with false smiles all round, only to find afterwards that the somewhat arrogant and disliked STASI-Chancellor Merkel was sabotaging part of the secret outcome of their meeting.

In particular the Editor was singularly impressed by the fact that as soon as he mentioned the intelligence, obtained from another source, that bankers standing in the way of the releases post-G-20 would be IMMEDIATELY ELIMINATED, this was instantly confirmed as accurate by a respected informant who could not have revealed it unless it had been mentioned by the Editor first.

• We were told: people who stand in the way will find that ‘they didn’t get to go home’.

In this connection, it is understood that two senior Directors on the Board of Citibank/Citigroup were ‘eliminated’ last week. When the Editor enquired whether this implied what he assumed it meant, the answer was in the affirmative; and the sources elaborated that ‘we think that they were zapped in some manner and suffered heart attacks’.

ROTHSCHILDS ‘DEALT WITH’ BY RUSSIAN AND CHINESE INTEL THUGS
Intelligence input received by this service also confirms that, standing in front of the Bush-Clinton-DVD-CIA Criminal Nexus, the three parties that have sabotaged the releases and the ‘final solution’ of this infernal Illuminati warfare all along have been the Rothschilds, the Connecticut Trust group of Trustee operatives, and Citibank. According to certain Jewish sources, no less, the Rothschilds’ behaviour has been dictated by their unwillingness to ‘lose their control’, or at least the degree of control to which they have been accustomed for generations.

Either during or shortly after the G-20 display in Canning Town, Russian and Chinese intelligence operatives (collaborating together under their long-range cooperative alliance) travelled to Paris, where they advised the Rothschilds there, that their ‘time is up’ and that they are required to yield. We were unable to establish why it was necessary for the Russians and Chinese to do this in Paris, given that the Rothschilds are headquartered these days in London. But it was stressed that the visit was not exactly a ‘friendly’ encounter.

And as previously noted, the Connecticut Trust group of Trustees, working for George Bush Sr., have indeed been in the habit of waiting for each successive attempt to procure the releases to be announced, attending at the relevant bank at the appointed date and time, creaming off the profit, and distributing it to designated recipients, as a consequence of which very large sums of money have accumulated in the bank accounts in question.

Further corrupt activity along these lines by these people will, we understand, result in them being summarily executed, like any bankers that may be foolish enough to persist, post-G-20, in standing in the way of resolution. A number of such Trustees have been ‘disposed of’ in the past after they got ‘too greedy’, but in the post-G-20 environment, no leeway is going to be allowed at all – which means that if this satanic impasse continues, we are going to see a number of bankers shot dead or ‘zapped’ in their offices, and Trustees gunned down at point blank range in the street.

As for Citibank, it seems that our early description of this institution as a criminal enterprise was a grotesque understatement on our part.

SECOND PHASE OF THE ICELANDIC LEG OF THE OCTOPUS ‘BLOWS’
The British press confirmed on 6th April 2009 that Iceland has hired Eva Joly, a Norwegian-French investigating magistrate who specialises in preparing complex fraud prosecutions, to advise the investigators and identify evidence of corruption. It will be recalled that the Bush Crime Family had been using Iceland as a laundering centre for elements of its Fraudulent Finance operations, and that the entire Icelandic financial system and the Icelandic krona went into meltdown last October after the Government had been forced to seize Kaupthing, Landsbanki and Glitnir, the country’s largest banks. Clearly, the Icelandic meltdown was an immediate consequence of the drying-up of liquidity in the system following the ‘lockdown’ event on 10th-12th September 2008 [see below].

The Daily Telegraph reported that a source close to the investigation said:

“We need serious help from Europe and the United Kingdom and tax havens to deal with the international aspects of this because it looks like there was a very elaborate network of crossholdings and money flowing overseas. It’s absolutely mind-boggling”.

It also looks as though the Icelandic authorities could benefit by a closer study of the background to their troubles, which they may not have understood, at the outset anyway: and that a good place for them to start might be with this website service.

THE GERMAN-ORIGINATED ‘BAIT AND SWITCH’ ROUTINE
The Franco-German Treaty of the Elysée was promoted by Dr Konrad Adenauer, the former Nazi-era Mayor of Cologne and friend of Schickelgrüber’s favourite German Jewish bankers, Drs Abs and Pferdmenges. Chancellor Adenauer is notorious for having told the Bundesrat that ‘we must never let the West know that our true orientation lies to the East’ – reflecting the historical realities that Nazism (National Socialism) and Communism (International Socialism) are dialectical twins and that German intelligence was resident inside the Kremlin (as it has been inside the White House and Downing Street) for many years: which explains the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact, and why the Nazis alternated between alliance with the German asset Josef Stalin (who weakened Russia by liquidating the officer corps) and attacking Russia, like rats in a sack. Among these Luciferian beings, loyalties and allegiances are strictly ephemeral, expendable, replaceable, and perfunctory.

The same has always been true of the DVD operative Mr George H. W. Bush Sr., whose modus operandi has invariably been the ‘bait and switch’ technique of turning on his trading partners (Saddam Hussein, Misolevic, Noriega, Sarkozy) as soon as they become too powerful, inciting his monumental lust and jealousy. Indeed the ‘bait and switch’ technique is quintessentially Leninist: and since the United States is in fact structured just like an overt Marxist-Leninist state, this should come as no surprise, either.

U.S. POWER STRUCTURES MODELLED ALONG LENINIST LINES
All overt Communist states have a ‘Security Council’ which is superior to the Government itself – the same model as is evident in the United States, where the National Security Council (NSC) appears to be subordinate to the Presidency but in fact tells it what to do.

In other key respects, too, the US control structure is identical to that of overt Communist régimes – with the standard power triangle consisting of the Intelligence Power (the ‘State within the State’), which is answerable to no-one, supposedly balanced by the Military Power (which it controls) and the Party (which it also controls, and which in the United States is divided into the two dialectical false ‘opposites’, Republican and Democrat).

That the Party is ONE is evident from the seamless interaction between the two wings – so that President Obama has no problem sending his supposed Republican ‘rivals’ Kissinger and Baker to Moscow to talk with the other false dialectical World Revolution ‘opposites’, the covert Soviets.

THE STRAIGHTFORWARD DRUG-TRAFFICKING TEST
If we step back for a moment to reflect on the staged propaganda delivered to the world by Messrs Brown and Obama in recent days, we can short-circuit queries about the bona fides of these two characters quite simply. The elementary way to establish whether Obama and Brown are genuine or controlled (a simple test that applies to everyone else on the stage as well), is to ask (even though we all know the answer):

• Has President Obama ordered the CIA to get out of drug trafficking?

• Has Prime Minister Gordon Brown ordered Government Operations-2 (GO-2) within MI6 to get out of drug distribution via its control of the two drug cartels distributing drugs in the United Kingdom, and its financing of the main political parties using drug money proceeds?

Of course the answer to both questions is no. By extension, we can further ask the subsidiary question: are they serving the interests of the American/British peoples, or not? And again the answer has to be: they can’t be, otherwise this would be their top priority, wouldn’t it. In that case, if they aren’t serving the interests of their populations, they must be serving some other interest – namely, of course, the internationalist One World Agenda, operating CONTRARY to the interests of the nation state, which it seeks to obliterate. Since the nation state is the natural human condition and has been found to serve the preferences and interests of human beings best, it follows that the One World Agenda does not meet the requirements of human beings, and can never do so.

France, Germany, China, the ‘former’ Soviet Union, Israel and other countries are also in the drug business: but that’s not the point. The issue is: do our leaders serve our interests?

And clearly, since they preside over Governments that are engaged in satanic operations (drug-trafficking and distribution) the purpose of which is to make money out of destroying people’s lives, they most certainly do not.

If Brown and Obama had stood on that Canning Town platform and condemned drug-trafficking and the participation of their own structures in this heinous activity, one might have been excused for perhaps taking them seriously.

And there are plenty of other devilish government-sanctioned activities to which they should be opposed, as well. But since neither of these ‘leaders’ condemned them – making no mention of any of the foregoing fundamental causes of the criminal finance crisis, which is degrading the whole world, in their pompous globalist dirges – neither of these two operatives should command our respect: except that President Obama is Head of State and, as previously mentioned, whatever the personality occupying this position, he or she must command a degree of deference because he or she represents the people who are, or ought to be (but are not), sovereign.

In 2005, a US operative said to the Editor of this service: ‘Don’t attack the drug operatives, or they will kill you’. Oh, so the problem is insoluble, is it? It can’t be resolved because anyone standing up to them will be murdered? President Obama cannot be expected to do the right thing because it’s too dangerous? Brown, ditto?

• Here’s a consideration for your attention. We have just broken this taboo. Would good people who may be reading this report care to join in? By all means reproduce what we have published here: be the Editor’s guest.

DRUG MONEY PROCEEDS AND THE INTERBANK MARKET
Now you will doubtless recall that, as previously reported by this service, the Executive Director of UNODC, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Sr. Antonio Maria Costa, was interviewed in the January 2009 issue of the Austrian journal Profil, and that in that interview he stated that in the second half of 2008 (a period which we think extended from mid-September onwards: see below), the ‘only new liquidity’ in the interbank market was drug money.

The other sources had been closed off – especially the illegal and corrupt misuse of the $14.0 trillion funds, including the Queen’s LOAN money within a total of $6.2 trillion that had been made available to finance the private sector on-the-books Refunding Programme which is the SOLUTION to the crisis, as agreed by the Group of Seven leading financial powers in June 2007, when The Queen appealed for this transparent trading to proceed ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’. The G-7 re-approved the private sector, revenue-generating refunding of the US Dollar System in 2008.

THAT SEPTEMBER 2008 MONEY ‘LOCKDOWN’
Following advice given and the steps taken at the beginning of September 2008, these funds (the entire $14.0 trillion) were placed into ‘lockdown’ between 10th and 12th September 2008, so that they could no longer be illegally exploited to finance the carousel, as previously explained. It was then only a matter of time before the Bush Crime Family-linked Madoff Ponzi scamming machine ran into severe trouble, in the context of the reported $7.0 billion of redemptions.

(Obviously it didn’t help that, according to The Jerusalem Post, Madoff had transferred $35 billion to the Israel Discount Bank via 181,000 separate wire transfers in the names of individual investors between March 2004 and the same month a year later) (4).

When ‘Sir’ R. Allen Stanford realised what was happening, he started to arrange for monies to be diverted from his various bank accounts – a state of affairs known to his one-man Antigua-based accountant, whose contract with Stanford expired on 31st December 2008. The accountant died suddenly on 1st January 2009.

From the information about drug money flows implied and given above, it can be assumed that one reason why the Great Powers do nothing whatsoever to terminate their structures’ drug-trafficking operations (except via token programmes designed to deflect criticism for public consumption) is that the resulting money flows lubricate the interbank market.

Which of course ties the banks, which are criminal enterprises, into the drug-trafficking business – explaining the corruption of the banks, which is justified on the basis of the argument that banks are neutral institutions which simply handle money flows.

Therefore, attempting to impose discipline and ‘standards’ on banks while Governments continue to sponsor and indulge in drug-trafficking, represents yet another display of the familiar duplicitous double-mindedness with which we have become familiar as we steadily strip the putrid layers of criminality off the legs of the criminal Octopus.

GERMAN MOLES INSIDE THE BRITISH OFFICIAL STRUCTURES
As in the United States, agents for the long-range Nazi strategic deception apparat are buried deep inside the UK structures, such as the Cabinet Office, the Treasury, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, the UK Ministry of Defence, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and the Department for Work and Pensions.

For instance, the ‘Europe Minister’, a ‘Blair Babe’ called Caroline Flint, said at the beginning of April that every operational unit of the British Army, the Royal Navy and the Royal Air Force will soon be available to fight under the EU flag in future wars ‘as part of an EU ‘force catalogue’’. Such crass, revolutionary anti-nation state abominations perpetrated by brainwashed political puppets proceed even as the German operation to entrap its Member States, most importantly Britain, is running into the sand as discussed above – reminding us that the EU is a deliberately structured ‘automaton’ which may keep on functioning long after its underpinning foundations have collapsed beneath it.

Moreover key personnel at the Bank of England have also been instrumental in furthering the long-range Abwehr strategy, whether ‘on the payroll’ or due to blackmail or other satanic pressures.

Thus a key figure at the Bank is a known de facto German agent, with an offshore bank account with Henry Ansbacher, British Virgin Islands (which harbours about 400,000 offshore corporations, the documents for which are stored in a concrete building there).

This crucial information emerged following the previously reported seizure by 300 heavily armed Metropolitan Police of the ‘Safety Lock Boxes’ in Mayfair, Edgeware and Hampstead on 2nd June 2008, as previously reported. ‘Payroll’ funds paid to this corrupt de facto agent for the DVD are believed to be siphoned via Deutsche Bank and UBS to the named bank in the British Overseas Territory, for the beneficiary whose account is in the name of Passenham.

CORRUPT TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS TO BE TAKEN OVER BY BRITAIN
In this context it is to be noted that the British Government is now in the process of bringing in legislation at Westminster, following a Commission of Inquiry headed by a British Judge, Sir Robin Auld, to suspend the Constitution of the Turks and Caicos Islands, to remove the Government and Cabinet, to close the single-camera House of Parliament (the House of Assembly) and to assume direct rule under the control of the Governor for an initial period of two years, in order to get to grips with the rampant corruption throughout the Territory‘s structures that the Commission has uncovered. The draft Order-in-Council to put this process into effect was submitted to Her Majesty The Queen in Council on 18th March and was laid before Parliament on 25th March. On the basis of current information, the takeover is expected to come into effect late this month.

Our Latin American service, The Latin American Times [Volume 20, Number 9], to be published in May 2009, will be devoted to this development.

PROFESSORS CLIMB ONTO OUR BANDWAGON
The Editor’s experience all his reporting life is that we stick our necks out in anticipation of what will take place. What we predict then takes place. Many months, perhaps even a year or more later, academics too timid to run the risk of sticking their necks out realise that what was predicted has indeed taken place. They then proceed to muscle in and to pontificate on the subject, having failed to anticipate what was coming down, but now, with the benefit of hindsight, claiming 100% of the credit for their ‘wise prognostications’ for themselves.

Current instances of this syndrome include pronouncements by the Nobel Laureate (therefore by definition, ‘prescient’) economist Joseph Stiglitz, and Professor K. Black, a Professor of Economics and Law with the University of Missouri:

• Dr Joseph Stiglitz, 3rd April 2009: ‘The Obama Administration’s $500 billion or more proposal to deal with America’s ailing banks has been described by some in the financial markets as a win-win-win proposal’, Stiglitz writes in The New York Times.

‘Actually, it’s a win-win-lose proposal: the banks win, investors win, and taxpayers lose’.

The (Geithner) proposal is ‘marked by overleveraging in the public sector, excessive complexity, poor incentives and a lack of transparency’, Stiglitz says.

‘The Government plan in effect involves insuring almost all losses. Since the private investors are spared most losses, then they primarily ‘value’ their potential gains’.

• Professor William K. Black, 5th April 2009: In an interview on the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) Bill Moyers Journal, William K. Black, Professor of Economics and Law at the University of Missouri, alleged that American banks and credit agencies conspired to create a system in which so-called ‘liars’ loans’ could receive AAA ratings and zero oversight, amounting to a truly massive FRAUD at the epicentre of American finance. But worse still, claimed Dr Black, Timothy Geithner, President Barack Obama’s Secretary of the Treasury, is currently engaged in a cover-up to keep the truth of America’s insolvency from its citizens’.

We can’t be bothered right now to sock you all of Professor Black’s prognostications: but if you have time to track them down on the Internet, you may, uh, come across a good deal of ‘thinking’ that you’ll instantly ‘recognise’ from your very assiduous reading of these reports and, if you are a subscriber, from your study of our analyses in successive issues of International Currency Review.

• For all of the above, please see these reports and successive issues of our journals, passim.

HYPOCRISY AND CANT IN THE G-20 COMMUNIQUE
The G-20 Communiqué (5) recycled the phrase that has been repeatedly used by Prime Minister Brown and his beleaguered and somewhat baffled Chancellor of the Exchequer, Alastair Darling, namely that ‘we have today pledged to do WHATEVER IS NECESSARY’ to:

• Restore confidence, growth, and jobs [unspoken: that we have destroyed by permitting and indulging in Fraudulent Finance];

• Repair the financial system [unspoken: that we have destroyed ditto] to restore lending;

• Strengthen financial regulation [unspoken: in order to regain former control over what our own permissive behaviour allowed to get completely out of control] to rebuild trust [unspoken: which our wayward, wilful and reprobate Fraudulent Finance behaviour, corruption, lies and systematic deception may have permanently destroyed];

• Fund [unspoken: using stolen and diverted funds and money created from the illicit use of other people’s money such as that of The Queen, in defiance of the legal principle that ‘the money you make from your illicit use of my money is my money’] and reform [unspoken: which we have been talking and doing not a lot about for years] our international financial institutions to overcome this crisis [unspoken: of our own making] and prevent future ones [unspoken: that is to say, crises of our own making that run beyond our control, like this one];

• Promote global trade and investment [unspoken: because we realise that in our greed and in pursuit of our secret agendas, we have come close to destroying ‘our global economy’, ‘globalism’ and therefore our planned route towards The New Underworld Order] and reject protectionism [which would complete the process of destroying our One World model], to underpin prosperity [unspoken: by which we really mean ‘to put our globalist model back together again]; and:

• Build an inclusive [globalist cliché], green [globalist cliché implying the unproven ideology of global warming] and sustainable recovery [globalist cliché: the standard overuse of the weasel word ‘sustainable’ implies that ‘if we don’t do what we are ordering the ‘planet’ to do, humanity will perish – a lie based upon the fallacy that the earth’s resources are finite, which is not true. At the time of Christ, there would have been perhaps 50-100 million people on earth. There are now 6.5 billion; and we are all breathing].

CRUCIAL FISCAL UNDERTAKINGS IN PARAGRAPH SIX
The Communiqué is full of this familiar globalist language, embracing ideologically ‘uncontestable’ presumptions which mask crude propaganda that is not to be challenged by simple people like us.

However Paragraph 6 contained actual SUBSTANCE, even though its CONTENT was masked in G-20-‘speak’ – the OPERATIVE keyword here being FISCAL:

‘6. We are undertaking a concerted fiscal expansion, which will save or create millions of jobs which would otherwise have been destroyed, and that will, by the end of next year, amount to $5 trillion, raise output by 4 per cent, and accelerate the transition to a green economy. We are committed to deliver the scale of sustained fiscal effort necessary to restore growth’.

But if we just take the British situation, there is no scope for ‘fiscal stimulus’ (reducing taxes) at all: in fact, in deference to German policy which is being served by the behaviour of the Governor of the Bank of England, who presided over the mismanagement of a (deliberately?) failed gilt issue the other day, the Chancellor of the Exchequer has actually been talking about RAISING TAXES, i.e. producing a deflationary budget later this month WHICH WILL MAKE THE SITUATION VERY MUCH WORSE. This is EXACTLY in line with covert DVD strategy to decapitate the British economy.

• FACT: In line with their slogan ‘For us the war never ended’, German (Nazi) strategists consider all economic policy to represent a pretext for economic warfare.

So what does Paragraph 6 mean by FISCAL?

The G-7-Approved private sector Refunding Programme of transparent trades yielding TAXABLE REVENUE to reliquefy the banks ON THE BOOKS, is the ONLY means whereby FISCAL STIMULUS can be delivered in the prevailing circumstances.

• FACT: The $5.0 trillion mentioned in Paragraph 6 refers to the tax that will have been raised on the books from the proceeds of the private sector Refunding Programme by the end of 2010.

By contrast, ‘Geithnerism’ – the son of ‘Paulsonism’ – involving the reckless, open-ended creation of Treasury debt in the background, creates no revenue at all, since by definition the public sector generates debt whereas it is ONLY the private sector that can generate TAXABLE REVENUE.

Therefore, it is clear that Paragraph 6 refers to the intended transparent private sector Refunding Programme, which, as this service has repeatedly sought to explain, both in these reports and in our printed subscription services, provides the SOLUTION to the crisis.

Indeed, the crisis would never have reached ‘train wreck’ status if this solution had been applied as soon as it had been approved by the Group of Seven financial powers in 2007. Instead of which, the criminal Paulson-Bush Jr. Treasury chose, as the Obama Treasury has also done, the corrupt off-balance sheet method – in a display of wanton arrogance and stupidity that defies belief, since the owners of the brains in question have more than enough ‘smarts’ between them to have been able to discern the correct way forward.

But crude self-enrichment and financing The New Underworld Order remained the priority, with the disastrous consequences that we predicted on 2nd September 2006 and again in December that year, and in our ‘train wreck’ reports in the summer of 2007: a disgraceful and disgusting display of opinionated, reprobate US official misbehaviour that cannot be expunged from the record (even though the ‘mainstream’ media is doing its best here) given that International Currency Review is resident all over the world, as a witness to these deliberate, criminal abominations.

THE PRIVATE MEETING BETWEEN THE QUEEN AND PRESIDENT OBAMA
Which brings us to what may have been said during the prolonged private meeting between the Queen and President Obama on 1st April 2009. After hastily trying to expunge the insults heaped upon the British during Mr Brown’s earlier visit to Washington, as we have described, President Obama’s minders stood on their heads and started promulgating the opposite message, namely that the ‘Special Relationship’ (so comprehensively mangled by criminalised American Administrations) is greatly to be valued, while our head of State is a jewel without compare (true).

Even so, President Obama arrived under a cloud, as implied by our ‘interview’ between The Queen and the President (see reports from 26th to 31st March 2009 – this text being so close to the reality that certain forces had it ‘snipped’ from our original report).

Now self-evidently, there would have been no flies on any wall inside Buckingham Palace. But even if a microphone had been installed within a picture frame above the Royal mantlepiece, no part of this supremely important private conversation could possibly, under any circumstances, have been leaked, and certainly not to the Editor of this service. That said, close observation left no doubt at all that The Queen deployed her unparalleled skills developed over 57 years of loyal service to place the young President at his ease, and then to persuade him that cooperation rather than confrontation would reap magnificent benefits for both parties, and for the whole world.

Since on-the-books private sector refunding using transparent, fully taxed trading operations yielding TAXABLE REVENUE in spades is the ONLY solution to the shambles created by the Bush-Paulson-Cheney criminal Administration, and exacerbated by the decisions taken under Geithner, and since transparent refunding will finance President Obama’s entire ambitious programme, with money to spare, it would appear that the Queen did not need to over-emphasise what the very intelligent President Barack Obama could certainly now see immediately for himself.

The unanswered question is whether his advisers, all of whom are linked to the Clinton Criminal Compartment of the CIA, had obfuscated this obvious solution or withheld any review of it from his attention – begging the further unanswered question as to whether President Obama was himself complicit in ignoring the G-7-Approved private sector Refunding Programme, or not.

But, as explained in the final brief update to our report dated 31st March, this is now, if the above assessment is correct, ‘water under the bridge’. What matters is that The Queen has diplomatically charmed and ‘turned’ President Obama in the interests of BOTH parties, and ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’. In the event that the Refunding Programme is sabotaged, then we would join those who proclaim that we are all doomed: but the indications are that it is to proceed.

SUDDEN CHANGE OF LANGUAGE AT THE FED
Open domain indications that A GENUINE DISCONTINUITY occurred as a specific consequence of the successful meeting between The Queen and President Obama are oblique, but telling. We can start with smoke signals from the Federal Reserve which – significantly – began almost immediately after the G-20 theatrical display, and which represented a precise REVERSAL of what the Federal Reserve had been saying PRIOR to that date. To wit:

• Bloomberg, 3rd April 2009: ‘Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said the central bank must retain the flexibility to withdraw its record injection of credit into the economy to keep inflation in check when the crisis abates’.

‘The central bank’s emergency ‘activities must not constrain the exercise of monetary policy as needed to meet our Congressional mandate to foster maximum sustainable employment and stable prices’, Bernanke said in a speech in Charlotte, North Carolina’.

‘The US central bank has effectively printed money to buy or lend against a range of assets [sic – Ed.] to alleviate the credit crunch and revive the economy. Bernanke’s speech today detailed steps that the Fed can take to remove that liquidity’.

• Bloomberg, 4th April: ‘The Federal Reserve’s two top officials assured that they will pull back their emergency credit programs once the crisis fades, even as they prepare to flood the system further with in excess of $1.0 trillion’.

‘Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said yesterday in Charlotte, North Carolina, that the Fed must retain the flexibility to withdraw its record cash injections to restrain prices. Vice Chairman Donald Kohn said in Wooster, Ohio, ‘the trick will be unwinding this balance sheet in a timely way to avoid inflation’.

‘We can’t go into this without knowing how we are going to get out again’, Kohn, 66, who’s worked for the Fed almost four decades, said in response to a question after a speech at the College of Wooster, where he received a bachelor’s degree in economics’.

FED PUSH FOR EXEMPTION FROM STATUTORY DEBT CEILING
In the course of his comments in Ohio, Kohn also lifted the lid on ANOTHER debt-building operation which may be in the pipeline, thereby reconfirming what a dreadful mess the Federal Reserve and the Treasury find themselves in as a consequence of their participation in and accommodation of this Fraudulent Finance orgy that came to a juddering halt in September 2008.

According to Bloomberg:

‘Kohn said the Fed and Treasury are seeking ‘other tools’ from Congress to help mop up excess cash. One possibility is that the Fed issue its own securities, or ‘Fed bills’, or the Treasury could issue special bills, and put the cash on deposit at the Fed’.

‘“It is important to get either of those tools EXEMPT FROM THE DEBT CEILING so that the Fed could have the power to absorb all the reserves it wanted to”, Kohn said’.

This, of course, would destroy the residual purpose of the Statutory Debt Ceiling, which is all that remains of Congress’s power to curb excessive borrowing by the Government.

In other words, to get out of its ghastly bind, the Federal Reserve is now pushing for a breach in the Statutory Debt Ceiling, which the Congress traditionally guards like a hawk – since if it were to be discarded or eroded, the Legislative Branch would be unable to exercise any constraint at all on the permissive borrowing of the Executive Branch.

FED NOW LESS CONCERNED ABOUT DEBT BECAUSE OF REFUNDING?
Now we have a choice here: we can speculate that this represents just the latest in a long line of demands by the Federal Reserve for the Legislature to furnish it with ‘whatever is necessary’ to enable it to overcome the calamity brought about by the fact that its previous Chairman, Dr Alan Greenspan, was DVD chieftain George H. W. Bush’s chief trader while also serving as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board; or we can speculate that, post-2nd April 2009, the Federal Reserve may be less concerned (assuming it ever was) about the Treasury’s colossal trash debt burden, given that it has had to recognise that the transparent private sector Refunding Programme generating windfall TAXABLE REVENUE is to go ahead from London, following the private meeting between The Queen and President Obama, so that there is nothing the Fed can do about it.

It is difficult to imagine how the Federal Reserve could possibly contemplate a full-frontal attack on Congress’s sacred Statutory Debt Limit if this were not the case.

As background, it is also a fact that private commentators are starting to deploy language that we have used for a long time in our reports. For instance, the US commentator Sean Brodrick stated on 1st April 2009 that bankers are financial terrorists and should be indicted. Thank you very much. Some of them may now be shot on sight: see above.

THE POST-G-20 CIA ‘COLLAPSING’ OPERATION
Beyond that, the following incredible state of affairs became apparent AFTER the conclusion of the overhyped G-20 theatrical display. What follows will stagger many people, no doubt.

Since we were double-crossed (see relevant reports dated 3rd and 18th March 2008), against the background of the de facto stealing of the Editor’s $35,000 private loan repayable with interest after two years on 11th June 2007, the Editor naturally severed relations with Mr Wanta. However on 24th March 2009, we received a copy of an email despatched by Wanta and addressed to an extended (revealed) list of media types, and to Attorney General Eric Holder, Lawrence Summers, Mr Paul A. Volcker, the Inspector General of the Federal Reserve, First Lady Michelle Obama, Valerie Jarrett, New York State Governor David A Patterson, Vice President Joseph Biden, US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, US Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, GAOFRAUDNET, the Joint Committee on Foreign Affairs, US Securities and Exchange Commission Enforcement Investigations, US Army Inspector General Green, US President Barack H. Obama and others, reading as follows:

Date: Tuesday, March 24, 2009, 11:51 am:
On advice of legal counsel, we will immediately seek treble damages from the US Department of the Treasury, et al, for lawless conversion of US Dollars 4.5 trillion plus daily interest accruals, and for denying me the lawful opportunity to pay my civil/repatriation income tax payment of US Dollars 1.575 trillion directly to our US Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Washington DC, USA, among other continuing incidents to be documented with extensive exhibits/documentation’.

President Obama… Thank you for trying, but it appears that our mutual attempt to cooperate and readily assist in the economic difficult times have fallen on deaf ears.

Thank you for your kind assistance.

Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta to the United Nations/USA/PRC/Republic of Singapore/State of Israel, Jerusalem.

Principality Central Bank Chairman.

Principality Trade Commissioner.

IT IS TIME………………“Never Let the Magic Dim”.

• Note: The ‘principality’ in question is a ‘micro-state’ in the Sydney, Australia, area calling itself The Principality of Snake Hill. The establishment of actual or ‘virtual’ micro-states (some of which are supposedly recognised by the United Nations) is a cynical operation of the globalist One World manipulators designed to hasten the fragmentation of the integrity of nation states. For instance, such a ‘micro-state’ exists inside the Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) complex outside Moscow.

We make no further comment on the above, and proceed now to two further comparably extraordinary developments.

On 3rd April, THE VERY DAY AFTER THE G-20 MEETING, Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., received a telephone call from the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Taxation asking him for filing and tax documentation in respect of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., Wanta’s corporation.

However it may be recalled that on 23rd March 2008, Wanta fired Michael Cottrell from his positions as Treasurer and Executive Vice President of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., by issuing and promulgating a three-page document called ‘Resolution of the Sole Shareholder’, whereas of course corporate resolutions are universally required to be Resolutions of the Board of Directors.

Equipped with this document, Mr Cottrell obtained the necessary forms from the Commonwealth of Virginia authorities and proceeded, with relief and at once, to file the necessary formal notices of his (irregular) ‘dismissal’ and his RESIGNATION dated 23rd March 2008 [see above] with the State tax authorities in Richmond, Commonwealth of Virginia.

But natürlich, on 3rd April 2009 the Virginia State authorities claimed, didn’t they, that they had no knowledge of that filing. Within half an hour, Michael Cottrell was of course able to fax copies of the documents that were filed with Virginia on 31st March 2008. Those papers necessarily stated that since Mr Cottrell was no longer Executive Vice President and Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., as of 23rd March 2008, all future enquiries and communications should be addressed to Mr Wanta at an address in the State of Wisconsin.

Again, bear in mind that this sudden interest on the part of the Virginia tax authorities surfaced IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE CLOSURE OF THE G-20 MEETING IN THE LONDON AREA.

Thirdly, we were informed, AGAIN on 3rd April 2009, by a knowledgeable US official source, that the State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue is to commence legal proceedings or has commenced legal proceedings to sue Bank of America, Richmond, for $4.5 trillion! See our Wantagate Petition for a Writ of Mandamus reports from June 2007 onwards, for background.

Now you may recall from our report dated 6th August 2007 that we have long since proved, with the assistance of documents (reproduced in International Currency Review) that the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue engaged in criminal conduct in charging Wanta THREE TIMES for State tax amounting to $14,129.00, which was paid twice, in May and then in June 1992, and a third time on 21st July 2005 using the Editor’s private LOAN funds. We also identified other respects in which criminal conduct by that Department was demonstrated.

The Editor attempted to assist Mr Wanta by asking the Wisconsin Court whether it would issue, following the ending of his probation as a consequence of the Editor’s payment effective 14th November 2005, the appropriate document recognising the restitution, but made no progress. Finally, on 17th October 2007, the Editor terminated this assistance by writing a Misprision of Felony letter to the relevant Judge in Wisconsin, drawing the Judge’s attention yet again to the matters displayed in our report dated 6th August 2007. All this information has been in the public domain in our financial journal and on this website for a very prolonged period of time.

We can comment no further on the specifics identified above. But what we CAN do, is draw your attention, finally, to the following considerations:

• As indicated, the telephone call from the Commonwealth of Virginia tax authorities and news of the Wisconsin Department of Revenue’s reported lawsuit against Bank of America BOTH occurred on 3rd April 2009, one day after the G-20 meeting.

• This clearly tends to support our assessment that A DECISIVE DISCONTINUITY amounting to ‘a resolution’ of key issues coincided with the G-20 event, arising from the meeting between The Queen and President Obama – ‘necessitating’ a CIA-contrived ‘collapsing’ operation (see below), (leaving aside the separate fact that Chancellor Merkel is reported, post-G-20, to be sabotaging the releases, as discussed above).

It could possibly be argued that the timing of the telephone call and the lawsuit information were both consequent specifically upon the issuance of Wanta’s notice of RICO action against the US Treasury; but in the overall G-20 context, that seems unlikely.

• The suing and cross-suing identified above represents a classic CIA IMPLOSION OPERATION, the overall purpose of which may well be to BURY this matter in a ‘Black’ avalanche of deliberately contrived confusion. It is associated with a parallel escalation of provocatively convoluted website confusion designed to intensify the impenetrable fog of disinformation, diversion, redirection and deception, with everyone portrayed to be fighting everyone else, and all at each other’s throats (a well-known cynical intelligence community obfuscation technique).

The intention of the lawsuits may be to ‘disappear’ the funds that have long since been stolen or diverted in a fog of cross-litigation lasting for years, with the prospect that cases will be dismissed and the entire matter wound up by process of exhaustion. Was this pre-planned? Of course it was.

• And was the advice given to Wanta to embark upon a RICO action ‘poisonous’ advice from a CIA lawyer? You decide.

The $6.2 trillion, of course, is not connected in any way with the foregoing, and was withdrawn as previously reported by this service, on 29th January 2009.

Notes:

(1) The verb ‘to thaumatrope’: to bombard captive audiences with endless verbiage without regard for those forced to put up with this offensive, such that the thaumatroper is engaged in a verbal assault from which the audience cannot escape.

(2) Base allegations that the Editor is ‘anti-French’ or ‘anti-German’ represent the concoctions of diminished minds. The Editor has visited France all his life, speaks French and has close friends in France. He studied singing in Vienna and travelled extensively in Germany in younger days, and listens non-stop to German classical music. We are addressing the evils of Governments and of the globalist usurpers, not of the abused peoples they are supposed to be serving.

(3) See the Editor’s book The New Underworld Order, Chapter Ten: ‘The Thousand-Year Reich’, available from the Edward Harle Limited (intelligence books) section of this combined website.

(4) During dinner in a Tarrytown, NY, restaurant the other day, the Editor’s guest asked what proportion of the perpetrators of these financial crimes are of Jewish extraction, to which the Editor responded: ‘100%’ (not quite true, as Stanford isn’t Jewish: but he’s an exception).

A few days later, an American Jewish contact in London made the unsolicited pertinent point to the Editor that ordinary people of Jewish extraction are getting extremely concerned at what has been happening because, as he put it, ‘they don’t want to be the scapegoats again’. This point was also raised several years ago by a Jewish leader in New York, who warned that if the Jewish community did not take care, there might be a ‘repeat performance’: and this was long before most people had heard of Bernard L. Madoff. The Education Director of a US School and Synagogue who is a friend of the Editor was asked some years ago (by the Editor) what his community’s attitude was towards these Jewish criminals who give the community such a bad name. He responded: ‘These people are a grave and continuing worry to our community. It is a very serious problem’.

These observations should ‘pacify’ anyone of diminished mental capacity who may deduce that our use of the taboo word ‘Jewish’ has any implications whatsoever beyond stating facts as they are, rather than in conformity with mind-controlled ‘political correctness’. Finally, the Editor’s Jewish friends on both sides of the Atlantic openly share this assessment.

(5) The full text of the Group of Twenty Communiqué issued from the London Summit on 2nd April 2009, is appended here for the record:

1. We, the Leaders of the Group of Twenty, met in London on 2 April 2009.

2. We face the greatest challenge to the world economy in modern times; a crisis which has deepened since we last met, which affects the lives of women, men, and children in every country, and which all countries must join together to resolve. A global crisis requires a global solution.

3. We start from the belief that prosperity is indivisible; that growth, to be sustained, has to be shared; and that our global plan for recovery must have at its heart the needs and jobs of hard-working families, not just in developed countries but in emerging markets and the poorest countries of the world too; and must reflect the interests, not just of today’s population, but of future generations too. We believe that the only sure foundation for sustainable globalisation and rising prosperity for all is an open world economy based on market principles, effective regulation, and strong global institutions.

4. We have today therefore pledged to do whatever is necessary to:
• Restore confidence, growth, and jobs;
• Repair the financial system to restore lending;
• Strengthen financial regulation to rebuild trust;
• Fund and reform our international financial institutions to overcome this crisis and prevent future ones;
• Promote global trade and investment and reject protectionism, to underpin prosperity; and
• Build an inclusive, green, and sustainable recovery.

By acting together to fulfil these pledges we will bring the world economy out of recession and prevent a crisis like this from recurring in the future.

5. The agreements we have reached today, to treble resources available to the IMF to $750 billion, to support a new SDR allocation of $250 billion, to support at least $100 billion of additional lending by the MDBs, to ensure $250 billion worth of support for trade finance, and to use the additional resources from agreed International Monetary Fund gold sales for concessional finance for the poorest countries, constitute an additional $1.1 trillion programme of support to restore credit, growth and jobs in the world economy. Together with the measures we have each taken nationally, this constitutes a global plan for recovery on an unprecedented scale.

Restoring growth and jobs:

6. We are undertaking an unprecedented and concerted fiscal expansion, which will save or create millions of jobs which would otherwise have been destroyed, and that will, by the end of next year, amount to $5 trillion, raise output by 4 per cent, and accelerate the transition to a green economy. We are committed to deliver the scale of sustained fiscal effort necessary to restore growth.

7. Our central banks have also taken exceptional action. Interest rates have been cut aggressively in most countries, and our central banks have pledged to maintain expansionary policies for as long as needed and to use the full range of monetary policy instruments, including unconventional instruments, consistent with price stability.

8. Our actions to restore growth cannot be effective until we restore domestic lending and international capital flows. We have provided significant and comprehensive support to our banking systems to provide liquidity, recapitalise financial institutions, and address decisively the problem of impaired assets. We are committed to take all necessary actions to restore the normal flow of credit through the financial system and ensure the soundness of systemically important institutions, implementing our policies in line with the agreed G-20 framework for restoring lending and repairing the financial sector.

9. Taken together, these actions will constitute the largest fiscal and monetary stimulus and the most comprehensive support programme for the financial sector in modern times. Acting together strengthens the impact and the exceptional policy actions announced so far must be implemented without delay. Today, we have further agreed over $1 trillion of additional resources for the world economy through our international financial institutions and trade finance.

10. Last month the IMF estimated that world growth in real terms would resume and rise to over two percent by the end of 2010. We are confident that the actions we have agreed today, and our unshakeable commitment to work together to restore growth and jobs, while preserving long-term fiscal sustainability, will accelerate the return to trend growth. We commit today to taking whatever action is necessary to secure that outcome, and we call on the IMF to assess regularly the actions taken and the global actions required.

11. We are resolved to ensure long-term fiscal sustainability and price stability and will put in place credible exit strategies from the measures that need to be taken now so as to support the financial sector and restore global demand. We are convinced that by implementing our agreed policies we will limit the longer-term costs to our economies, thereby reducing the scale of the fiscal consolidation necessary over the longer term.

12. We will conduct all our economic policies cooperatively and responsibly with regard to the impact on other countries and will refrain from competitive devaluation of our currencies and promote a stable and well-functioning international monetary system. We will support, now and in the future, to candid, even-handed, and independent IMF surveillance of our economies and financial sectors, of the impact of our policies on others, and of risks facing the global economy.

Strengthening financial supervision and regulation:

13. Major failures in the financial sector and in financial regulation and supervision were fundamental causes of the crisis. Confidence will not be restored until we rebuild trust in our financial system. We will take action to build a stronger, more globally consistent, supervisory and regulatory framework for the future financial sector, which will support sustainable global growth and serve the needs of business and citizens.

14. We each agree to ensure our domestic regulatory systems are strong. But we also agree to establish the much greater consistency and systematic cooperation between countries, and the framework of internationally agreed high standards, that a global financial system requires.

Strengthened regulation and supervision must promote propriety, integrity and transparency; guard against risk across the financial system; must dampen rather than amplify the financial and economic cycle; reduce reliance on inappropriately risky sources of financing; and discourage excessive risk-taking. Regulators and supervisors must protect consumers and investors, support market discipline, avoid adverse impacts on other countries, reduce the scope for regulatory arbitrage, support competition and dynamism, and keep pace with innovation in the marketplace.

15. To this end we are implementing the Action Plan agreed at our last meeting, as set out in the attached progress report. We have today also issued a Declaration, Strengthening the Financial System. In particular we agree:

• To establish a new Financial Stability Board (FSB) with a strengthened mandate, as a successor to the Financial Stability Forum (FSF), including all G-20 countries, FSF members, Spain, and the European Commission;

• That the FSB should collaborate with the IMF to provide early warning of macroeconomic and financial risks and the actions needed to address them;

• To reshape our regulatory systems so that our authorities are able to identify and take account of macro-prudential risks;

• To extend regulation and oversight to all systemically important financial institutions, instruments and markets. This will include, for the first time, systemically important hedge funds;

• To endorse and implement the FSF’s tough new principles on pay and compensation and to support sustainable compensation schemes and the corporate social responsibility of all firms;

• To take action, once recovery is assured, to improve the quality, quantity, and international consistency of capital in the banking system. In future, regulation must prevent excessive leverage and require buffers of resources to be built up in good times;

• To take action against non-cooperative jurisdictions, including tax havens. We stand ready to deploy sanctions to protect our public finances and financial systems. The era of banking secrecy is over. We note that the OECD has today published a list of countries assessed by the Global Forum against the international standard for exchange of tax information;

• To call on the accounting standard setters to work urgently with supervisors and regulators to improve standards on valuation and provisioning and achieve a single set of high-quality global accounting standards; and:

• To extend regulatory oversight and registration to Credit Rating Agencies to ensure they meet the international code of good practice, particularly to prevent unacceptable conflicts of interest.

16. We instruct our Finance Ministers to complete the implementation of these decisions in line with the timetable set out in the Action Plan. We have requested the FSB and the IMF to monitor progress, working with the Financial Action Taskforce and other relevant bodies, and to provide a report to the next meeting of our Finance Ministers in Scotland in November.

Strengthening our global financial institutions :

17. Emerging markets and developing countries, which have been the engine of recent world growth, are also now facing challenges which are adding to the current downturn in the global economy. It is imperative for global confidence and economic recovery that capital continues to flow to them. This will require a substantial strengthening of the international financial institutions, particularly the IMF. We have therefore agreed today to make available an additional $850 billion of resources through the global financial institutions to support growth in emerging market and developing countries by helping to finance counter-cyclical spending, bank recapitalisation, infrastructure, trade finance, balance of payments support, debt rollover, and social support.

To this end:

• We have agreed to increase the resources available to the IMF through immediate financing from members of $250 billion, subsequently incorporated into an expanded and more flexible New Arrangements to Borrow, increased by up to $500 billion, and to consider market borrowing if necessary; and:

• We support a substantial increase in lending of at least 100 billion dollars by the Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs), including to low income countries, and [will] ensure that all MDBs have the appropriate capital [Text unclear here].

18. It is essential that these resources can be used effectively and flexibly to support growth. We welcome in this respect the progress made by the IMF with its new Flexible Credit Line (FCL) and its reformed lending and conditionality framework which will enable the IMF to ensure that its facilities address effectively the underlying causes of countries’ balance of payments financing needs, particularly the withdrawal of external capital flows to the banking and corporate sectors.

We support Mexico’s decision to seek an FCL arrangement.

19. We have agreed to support a general SDR allocation which will inject $250 billion into the world economy and increase global liquidity, and urgent ratification of the Fourth Amendment.

20. In order for our financial institutions to help manage the crisis and prevent future crises we must strengthen their longer term relevance, effectiveness and legitimacy. So alongside the significant increase in resources agreed today we are determined to reform and modernise the international financial institutions to ensure they can assist members and shareholders effectively in the new challenges they face. We will reform their mandates, scope and governance to reflect changes in the world economy and the new challenges of globalisation, and that emerging and developing economies, including the poorest, must have greater voice and representation. This must be accompanied by action to increase the credibility and accountability of the institutions through better strategic oversight and decision making.

To this end:

• We commit to implementing the package of IMF quota and voice reforms agreed in April 2008 and call on the IMF to complete the next review of quotas by January 2011;

• We agree that, alongside this, consideration should be given to greater involvement of the Fund’s Governors in providing strategic direction to the IMF and increasing its accountability;

• We commit to implementing the World Bank reforms agreed in October 2008. We further look forward to further recommendations, at the next meetings, on voice and representation reforms on an accelerated timescale, to be agreed by the 2010 Spring Meetings;

• We agree that the heads and senior leadership of the international financial institutions should be appointed through an open, transparent, and merit-based selection process; and:

• Building on the current reviews of the IMF and World Bank we asked the Chairman, working with the G-20 Finance Ministers, to consult widely in an inclusive process and report back to the next meeting with proposals for further reforms to improve responsiveness and adaptability of the IFIs.

21. In addition to reforming our international financial institutions for the new challenges of globalisation we agreed on the desirability of a new global consensus on the key values and principles that will promote sustainable economic activity. We support discussion on such a charter for sustainable economic activity with a view to further discussion at our next meeting.

We take note of the work started in other fora in this regard and look forward to further discussion of this charter for sustainable economic activity.

Resisting protectionism and promoting global trade and investment:

22. World trade growth has underpinned rising prosperity for half a century. But it is now falling for the first time in 25 years. Falling demand is exacerbated by growing protectionist pressures and a withdrawal of trade credit. Reinvigorating world trade and investment is essential for restoring global growth. We will not repeat the historic mistakes of protectionism of previous eras.

To this end:

• We reaffirm the commitment made in Washington: to refrain from raising new barriers to investment or to trade in goods and services, imposing new export restrictions, or implementing World Trade Organisation (WTO) inconsistent measures to stimulate exports. In addition we will rectify promptly any such measures. We extend this pledge to the end of 2010;

• We will minimise any negative impact on trade and investment of our domestic policy actions including fiscal policy and action in support of the financial sector. We will not retreat into financial protectionism, particularly measures that constrain worldwide capital flows, especially to developing countries;

• We will notify promptly the WTO of any such measures and we call on the WTO, together with other international bodies, within their respective mandates, to monitor and report publicly on our adherence to these undertakings on a quarterly basis;

• We will take, at the same time, whatever steps we can to promote and facilitate trade and investment; and:

• We will ensure availability of at least $250 billion over the next two years to support trade finance through our export credit and investment agencies and through the MDBs.

We ask our regulators to make use of available flexibility in capital requirements for trade finance.

23. We remain committed to reaching an ambitious and balanced conclusion to the Doha Development Round, which is urgently needed. This could boost the global economy by at least $150 billion per annum. To achieve this we are committed to building on the progress already made, including with regard to modalities.

24. We will give renewed focus and political attention to this critical issue in the coming period and will use our continuing work and all international meetings that are relevant to drive progress.

Ensuring a fair and sustainable recovery for all:

25. We are determined not only to restore economic growth but to lay the foundation for a fair and sustainable world economy. We recognise that the current crisis has a disproportionate impact on the vulnerable in the poorest countries and recognise our collective responsibility to mitigate the social impact of the crisis to minimise long-lasting damage to global potential.

To this end:

• We reaffirm our historic commitment to meeting the Millennium Development Goals and to achieving our respective ODA pledges, including commitments on Aid for Trade, debt relief, and the Gleneagles commitments, especially to sub-Saharan Africa;

• The actions and decisions we have taken today will provide $50 billion to support social protection, boost trade and safeguard development in low income countries, as part of the significant increase in crisis support for these and other developing countries/ emerging markets;

• We are making available resources for social protection for the poorest countries, including through investing in long-term food security and through voluntary bilateral contributions to the World Bank’s Vulnerability Framework, including the Infrastructure Crisis Facility, and the Rapid Social Response Fund;

• We have committed, consistently with the new income model, that additional resources from agreed sales of IMF gold will be used, together with surplus income, to provide $6 billion additional concessional and flexible finance for the poorest countries over the next 2 to 3 years. We call on the IMF to come forward with concrete proposals at the Spring Meetings;

• We have agreed to review the flexibility of the Debt Sustainability Framework and call on the IMF and World Bank to report to the IMFC and Development Committee at the Annual Meetings; and

• We call on the UN, working with other global institutions, to establish an effective mechanism to monitor the impact of the crisis on the poorest and most vulnerable.

26. We recognise the human dimension to the crisis. We commit to support those affected by the crisis by creating employment opportunities and through income support measures. We will build a fair and family-friendly labour market for both women and men.

We therefore welcome the reports of the London Jobs Conference and the Rome Social Summit and the key principles they proposed. We will support employment by stimulating growth, investing in education and training, and through active labour market policies, focusing on those who are most vulnerable. We call upon the ILO, working with other relevant organisations, to assess the actions taken and those required for the future.

27. We agreed to make the best possible use of investment funded by fiscal stimulus programmes towards the goal of building a resilient, sustainable, and green recovery.

We will make the transition towards clean, innovative, resource efficient, low carbon technologies and infrastructure. We encourage the MDBs to contribute fully to the achievement of this stated objective. We will identify and work together on further measures to build sustainable economies.

28. We reaffirm our commitment to address the threat of irreversible climate change, based on the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities, and to reach agreement at the UN Climate Change conference in Copenhagen in December 2009.

Delivering our commitments:

29. We have committed ourselves to work together with urgency and determination to translate these words into action. We agreed to meet again before the end of this year to review progress on our commitments (6).

(6) Tax Information Exchange Agreements (TIEAS) are based on a model OECD agreement on the exchange of information on tax matters, developed by the OECD Global Forum Working Group on Effective Exchange of Information. The purpose of this Agreement is to promote international co-operation in tax matters through the exchange of information. It was developed by the OECD’s Global Forum Working Group on Effective Exchange of Information (“the Working Group”). The Working Group consisted of representatives from OECD Member countries as well as delegates from Aruba, Bermuda, Bahrain, Cayman Islands, Cyprus, The Isle of Man, Malta, Mauritius, the Netherlands Antilles, the Seychelles and San Marino (the Italian mafia’s de facto jurisdiction).
The Agreement grew out of the work undertaken by the OECD to address harmful tax practices.

The lack of effective exchange of information is one of the primary criteria used in determining harmful tax practices. The mandate of the Working Group was to develop a legal instrument that could be used to establish effective exchange of information. The Agreement represents the standard of effective exchange of information for the purposes of the OECD’s initiative on harmful tax practices. This Agreement text, which was released by the OECD in April 2002, is not a binding instrument but contains two models for bilateral agreements. A number of bilateral agreements have been based on this Agreement.

Recent bilateral Tax Information Exchange Agreements (TIEAS) monitored by this service include:

• Antigua & Barbuda – Australia, 30 January 2007
• Antigua & Barbuda – United States, 06 December 2000
• Antigua & Barbuda – Australia, 30 January 2007
• Antigua & Barbuda – United States, 06 December 2000
• Aruba – United States, 21 November 2003
• Australia – Bermuda, 15 November 2005
• Australia – British Virgin Islands, 27 October 2008
• Australia – Isle of Man, 29 January 2009
• Australia – Netherlands Antilles, 01 March 2007
• Bahamas – United States, 25 January 2002
• Bermuda – United Kingdom, 4 December 2007
• British Virgin Islands – United States, 03 April 2002
• Cayman Islands – United States, 27 November 2001
• Denmark – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Denmark – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Denmark – Isle of Man, 30 October 2007
• Denmark – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• Faroes – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Faroes – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Faroes – Isle of Man, 30 October 2007
• Faroes – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• Finland – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Finland – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Finland – Isle of Man, 30 October 2007
• Finland – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• France – Guernsey, 24 March 2009
• France – Isle of Man, 26 March 2009
• France – Jersey, 23 March 2009
• Germany – Guernsey, 26 March 2009
• Germany – Isle of Man, 02 March 2009
• Greenland – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Greenland – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Greenland – Isle of Man, 30 October 2007
• Greenland – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• Guernsey – Netherlands, 25 April 2008
• Iceland – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Iceland – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Iceland – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• Ireland – Guernsey, 26 March 2009
• Ireland – Jersey, 26 March 2009
• Isle of Man – Ireland, 24 April 2008
• Isle of Man – Netherlands, 12 October 2005
• Isle of Man – Norway, 30 October 2007
• Isle of Man – Sweden, 30 October 2007
• Isle of Man – United Kindom, 29 September 2008
• Isle of Man – United States, 02 October 2002
• Jersey – Germany, 4 July 2008
• Jersey – Netherlands, 20 June 2007
• Jersey – United States, 04 November 2002
• Netherlands Antilles – New Zealand, 01 March 2007
• Netherlands Antilles – Spain, 10 June 2008
• Netherlands Antilles – United States, 17 April 2002
• Norway – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Norway – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Norway – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• Sweden – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Sweden – Guernsy, 28 October 2008
• Sweden – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• United Kingdom – British Virgin Islands, 29 October 2008
• United Kingdom – Guernsey, 20 January 2009
• United Kingdom – Jersey, 10 March 2009
• United States – Liechtenstein, 8 December 2008
• United States – Gibraltar, 31 March 2009

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. Some versions have a ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

Advertisements

SETTLEMENTS AND REFUNDING: OR DOLLAR COLLAPSES

FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF DEVELOPMENTS SINCE THE U.S. ELECTION

Monday 5 January 2009 00:01

• The US dollar requires refunding as a matter of the most extreme urgency.

The G-7-Approved Private Sector on-the-books Capital Markets Refinancing Programme, which was criminally blocked against the interests of the American people and the entire world by the self-serving thieves headed by the Bushes, Paulson, Cheney, the Clintons, Greenspan, Bernanke et al from June 2006 onwards, is the ONLY means whereby this can be achieved.

It CANNOT be done from WITHIN the US Federal Government structures, as the Government ONLY CREATES DEBT. The Private Capital Markets Refinancing Programme agreed upon by the Group of Seven financial powers CREATES REVENUE and ONGOING U.S. TREASURY TAX RECEIPTS.

Government and White House structures, being PUBLIC SECTOR, cannot do this.

The crisis that developed from June 2006 onwards is a SPECIFIC CONSEQUENCE of the corrupt decision by President George W. Bush Jr., Henry M. Paulson, Vice President Cheney, Dr Bernard Bernanke, George Bush Sr, Dr Alan Greenspan, and others, to perpetuate the depraved deficit-financing and fraudulent finance/self-enrichment carousel CREATING EVER MORE DEBT that was then hidden off-balance-sheet, rather than proceeding with the REVENUE-PRODUCING SOLUTION using fully taxed on-the-books private sector capital markets transactions that has been ON THE TABLE since 2005/2006 and which is THE ONLY WAY FORWARD FOR AMERICA AND THE WORLD.

Due to the unchecked criminal, perverse behaviour of the highest-level operatives listed above and exposed by this service, the prospect of the weight of derivative junk crashing through the ceiling into the basement and demolishing several of the largest institutions in the world, is no longer academic. If this happens, there will be a global collapse into uncontrollable chaos.

If the incoming Obama Government deviates in ANY respect from the G-7-Approved on-the-books Private Sector Capital Markets US dollar refunding formula, THE U.S. DOLLAR WILL COLLAPSE and THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC WILL NOT SURVIVE. That is the stark reality: the bottom line.

• Be warned. Our predictions, from September 2006 onwards, have been ACCURATE.

• THIS REPORT HAS BEEN UPDATED TO 8TH JANUARY, 2.00PM UK TIME…

• Mr Barack Obama has been using words like ‘oversight’, ‘transparency, and ‘full accountability’, which are NOT words that sink happily into the ears of the giga-crooks whose time is up. On 8th January, he appointed a Chief Performance Officer, Nancy Killefer, formerly of the IRS Oversight Committee and a Treasury performance evaluation expert.

• MADOFF: $1.7 BILLION IN CASH AND LIQUID ASSETS FOUND BY IRVING J. PICARD: The Trustee appointed by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) has uncovered not only the cash sum of $830 million reported below, but also a further $850 million in liquid assets, according to The Times, London, of 8th January 2009. Judge Ronald Ellis has to decide whether Mr Madoff’s activities, including the distribution by himself and his wife of valuables, called heirlooms by the Defendant’s lawyer, Ira Sorkin, when reporting to the Court on 7th January, warrant the revocation of Madoff’s bail terms. Court documents we hold, seem pretty clear on this point.

• OUT OF THE FRYING PAN AND HOVERING IN MID-AIR BEFORE FALLING INTO THE FIRE?

• THE ELITE POWER CONTINUUM’S NEW-OLD CONTROLLING TEAM

• THE PLAN: TO PURPORT TO IMPLEMENT THE G-7-APPROVED REFINANCING SCHEME WHILE IN PRACTICE CONTINUING CORRUPT ‘BUSINESS AS USUAL’: WHEN THE EDITOR SAID THIS ON THE TRANSATLANTIC PHONE, FORT MEADE PULLED THE CONNECTION, MEANING: IT’S TRUE.

• FOR THESE PEOPLE, DEBT IS AN ASSET CONTAINING CASHFLOW THAT CAN BE STOLEN

• ROCKEFELLERS, FACING DISASTER, FORCING BUSH CROOKS TO COMPLY?

• WHY THERE IS NO WAY OUT FOR THE FRAUDULENT FINANCE CADRES

• THE DEBT-ORIENTED ‘NEW ECONOMIC TEAM’ IMPOSED ON OBAMA

• LEON PANETTA FOR DCI? ARE THESE DESPERADOS MENTALLY CHALLENGED? [NEW]

• THE INITIALLY DELICATE POSITION OF BARACK OBAMA

• INCOMING PRESIDENT IS IN A STRONGER POSITION THAN PEOPLE MAY THINK

• PROMINENT RECENT ‘NEUTRALISATIONS’: SEE ‘IN MEMORIAM BELOW

• ‘FEEDER’ PONZI FINANCIER MURDERED TO COVER UP ALPHA CONNECTION?

• PRESIDENTIAL PARDONS WON’T SOLVE THEIR PROBLEM

• THE SECONDARY ‘FEEDER’ FUNDS WERE SEPARATE PONZI FRAUDS

• PERTINENT QUESTIONS FOR THE BENEFIT OF ‘THE INTERESTED’

• LONDON ‘SAFETY LOCK BOX’ RAIDS REMOVED THE COLLATERAL

• MADOFF PONZI CAROUSEL THEN BECAME A PRIMARY SOURCE OF FUNDS

• FIVE-HOUR EMERGENCY MEETING BETWEEN MRS CLINTON AND GEITHNER

• NEW YORK FED AND S.E.C INVOLVED IN THE MASTER SCANDALS

• BIG BANKS REFUSING CLIENTS ACCESS TO THEIR OWN FUNDS (= THEFT)

• OUTLINE INFORMATION ABOUT CAROUSEL TRANSACTIONS

• ‘RETAIL’ INVESTORS’ FUNDS STOLEN TO FINANCE CAROUSEL PONZI FRAUDS

• OTHER HIDEOUS DIMENSIONS OF THE POISON OF THE OCTOPUS

• ‘MAINSTREAM’ AND COURTS CONCERNED, FOR NOW AT LEAST, ONLY WITH THE MONEY ‘IN’

• FACT: NONE OF THIS MONEY HAS VANISHED. IT HAS ALL BEEN STOLEN…

• STANDARD ‘BCCI PROCEDURE’: COLLAPSE THE ‘MONEY MACHINE’, RAKE OUT THE MONEY

• POSSIBLE ISRAELI TIT-FOR-TAT FOR THE BUSH-TRIGGERED MADOFF TAKEDOWN

• STOKING UP ANTI-SEMITISM: A CYNICAL ‘ADDED BONUS’ FOR THE REVOLUTION

• DOUBLE-MINDEDNESS AND THE DOUBLE-CROSS TRADITION

• ‘MADOFF TAKEDOWN’ RELEASED TRILLIONS TO BE STOLEN WITH EASE

• GLOBALIST STRATEGISTS DESTABILISED BY SUCCESSIVE EXPLOSIONS

• UNPRECEDENTED ADMISSION BY THE IMF MANAGING DIRECTOR THAT ELITE IS TO BLAME

• BANKS HOARDING MONEY IN CASE DTC GUARANTEES ARE CALLED

• CORRUPT ‘BUSINESS AS USUAL’ PLANS IN DISARRAY

• SUCCESSIVE WAVES OF DEFAULTS OUT TO 2012-2014

• THE STRENGTHENING OF BARACK OBAMA’S POSITION

• THE FATE OF DELUDED HOLD-OUTS AGAINST THE SETTLEMENTS

• SHOUTING MATCH OVER PAYOUTS TO U.S.-BASED RECIPIENTS

• UGLY SITUATIONS FACING KEY PLAYERS

• DECISION TO APPLY THE ‘BCCI/ICELAND/ENRON TREATMENT’ TO MADOFF

• BELATED OPERATION TO DISCREDIT PRESIDENT SARKOZY

• WHAT PRESIDENT BUSH JR. WAS REALLY UP TO IN BAGHDAD: TRYING TO STEAL MONEY

• NO DENIAL OF THE MORGAN STANLEY TERRORISM FINANCING CENTER

• AL-QAEDA WILL HAVE TO BE CLOSED DOWN: BY BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA

• FOLLOWING OUR MULTIPLE EXPOSURES, DVD NOW SAID TO BE ‘BITTERLY DIVIDED’

• DVD’S BRUSSELS BLACKMAIL UNIT AIMED AT EUROPEAN COMMISSIONERS: DG1-X

• THE MADOFF HYDROGEN BOMB EXPLODES

• MADOFF RECRUITED BY, AND ‘WORKED FOR’, BUSH/CIA PONZI CRIME APPARAT

• ‘MADOFF TAKEDOWN’: A VAST SMOKESCREEN ‘PROTECTING’ THE GIGA-CROOKS

• MADOFF ‘CHANGES THE SUBJECT’, WHILE LAW ENFORCEMENT SITS ON ITS HANDS

• THE PRIMARY ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS FROM THE MADOFF COURT FILES

• MADOFF BANK ACCOUNTS WITH JP MORGAN CHASE AND BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON

• MORE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON BANK ACCOUNTS COME TO LIGHT

• EXPERT ADVANCE WARNINGS ‘DISREGARDED BY THE S.E.C.’

• HEAVILY PROMOTED STAR WITNESS FAILS TO APPEAR: WAS HE THREATENED?

• PARALLEL INTERVENTION OF THE SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION

• IF YOU THINK YOU’RE A VICTIM, THE FBI WOULD LIKE TO HEAR FROM YOU

• INTERIM LIST OF ‘MONEY IN’ LOSERS ARISING FROM THE COLLAPSING
OF THE MADOFF COMPONENT OF THE GLOBAL PONZI MONEY MACHINE

• FORMER PRESIDENT CLINTON FORCED TO REVEAL HIS ‘DONORS’

• PARTIAL LIST OF CLINTON FOUNDATION ‘DONORS’

• CONCLUSION: U.S. DOLLAR REFUNDING MUST PROCEED AS DEMANDED BY THE G-7

• THE ORIGINAL PONZI SCHEME EXPLAINED: AGAIN, IN CASE YOU MISSED IT EARLIER

• LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS HAVE FLOUTED

• THE COPYRIGHT OF THIS ARTICLE IS OWNED BY WORLD REPORTS LIMITED: ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED. ELECTRONIC REPRODUCTION OF PART OR ALL OF THIS TEXT PROHIBITED.

• WE HAVE RECENTLY ISSUED AN INVOICE FOR $27.3 MILLION AGAINST AN INFRINGER OF OUR COPYRIGHT WORKS IN CALIFORNIA, WITH FULL DETAILS FURNISHED TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WHICH IS HYPERSENSITIVE ABOUT COPYRIGHT BREACHES.

• THE USUAL CROP OF FABRICATIONS ABOUT THE EDITOR OF THIS SERVICE HAS STARTED UP, WITH ONE GROSS LIBEL ASSERTING THAT THE EDITOR ‘WORKS FOR’ A CERTAIN POWER. SUCH LIES ARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO (1) IGNORANCE AND (2) MALICE. THIS OPERATION IS 100% INDEPENDENT, ALWAYS HAS BEEN, ALWAYS WILL BE, AND FUNCTIONS ARMS’-LENGTH FROM ALL OUTSIDE INTERESTS. SEE THE STATEMENT IN PLAIN ENGLISH AT THE FOOT OF REPORT.

• ANONYMOUS SOURCES OF ‘INFORMATION’ AND ‘DEBATE’: By definition, all anonymous US sources of so-called ‘information’ are spooks and other cowards who are too scared to reveal their identities, for fear not least of being held accountable for their convoluted fabrications. Therefore, anyone who attaches significance or relevance to ANYTHING that any of these anonymous, self-contradictory sources purport to be revealing, does so at his or her own peril. One can of course freely choose to be misled by the various US controlled disinformation, diversion and obfuscation sources, if one wishes to avert one’s gaze from the obvious: namely that the kleptocracy is running these Psy-Ops diversionary operations in order to provide themselves with cover for their odious crimes, and to keep the Ponzi victims hoping, like Rip van Winkel, that they haven’t been ripped off. And since the anonymous spooks and cowards hide behind anonymity, any denial of this apparent truth from them will, like all pronouncements aimed at misleading the ‘scammed’, lack credibility.

Obviously, some of these anonymous sources who cannot be held accountable for any of their lies and fabrications, may take objection to what we may publish. However that is their problem: since they do not reveal their identities, no communication with these operatives is ever possible or at any stage desirable, because in any ‘debate’, a level playing field is necessary: a ‘debate’ between a real person and anonymous spooks and cowards would not take place on a level playing field.

The cover of these anonymous spookies has been well and truly blown. When this happens, the knee-jerk response is to resort to defamation. However defamation of a real person by anonymous spooks lacks all credibility too, and simply reveals the pinpoint accuracy of the assessment.

In any case, as has been stated at the foot of most of our reports for years, we cannot enter into correspondence as a consequence of these reports. Many of those who may attempt to enter into correspondence with us are not subscribing to our published services and have no intention of doing so. This service was originally developed to be of assistance to our subscribers, and that is its main purpose. The Editor’s job is to manage and produce the publications listed on our catalog, accessible via this website. The production of these reports is a secondary exercise. Therefore, if you don’t subscribe, we are not available to be of further assistance. The Editor does, however, try to respond to kind and helpful emails expressing positive support, provided that all coordinates are clearly shown in the Contact Us fields so provided. Again, the Editor has been quite amazed at the kindness shown in response to our Christmas posting dated 26th December 2008.

That experience confirms the Editor’s personal experience that Americans are often the kindest and most generous people in the world. Their problem is that their Government is run by organised geomasonic crime. Amid great fury, a tectonic change is in progress which few yet understand.

For a comprehensive debunking and takedown of the geomasonic New World Order, please place an order for the Editor’s book The New Underworld Order, available from this combined website.

• NEW: CALENDAR OF OFFICIAL REGULATORY AND ENFORCEMENT FAILURES: SEE BELOW

• NEW: IN MEMORIAM: LIST OF RELATED/REPORTED SUDDEN DEATHS (‘SUICIDINGS’)

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

Just as material posted on the Internet by ANONYMOUS sources lacks credibility, so that therefore its content should prudently be dismissed as irrelevant, so are emails addressed for our attention from ANONYMOUS senders considered impertinent and unworthy of attention. Secondly, offensive emails ventilating some gripe or other, are normally deleted unread by our system. On a pleasing note, we received a VERY LARGE positive ‘e-mailbag’ following the 26th December 2008 Christmas report, which the Editor found very touching, kind, unexpected and generous*. Thank you! Contrary to expectations, opposition was extremely feeble, confined even to lecturing the Editor on which Bible he should be reading! When you stand up to them, THEY FALL BACK TO THE GROUND.

* Interestingly, all these generous emails (and phone calls) emanated from the United States and Canada. There was NOT ONE SINGLE SUCH RESPONSE from the United Kingdom. NOT ONE.

Advertisement:
NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system that assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program that devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. Some versions have a ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

• INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW, Volume 33, #s 3 & 4, all 972 pages of it, is making waves all over the world. It contains a blow-by-blow deconstruction of this crisis via the Wantagate plus our further analyses: and everything published therein is now well and truly ON THE GLOBAL PUBLIC RECORD. Accordingly the whole world owns a detailed, damning account of the serial criminality of the Bush-Cheney-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ et al., which CANNOT BE EXPUNGED.

• INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW, Volume 34, Number 1, consisting of some 400 pages, WAS DISTRIBUTED BY FAST MAIL TO SUBSCRIBERS WORLDWIDE ON 29TH NOVEMBER 2008…

• It tracks the fallout from our exposures of the criminality from mid-April 2008 to 6th October 2008, when this issue of ICR had to go to press. The Glossary that is published with The Cottrell Plan has been separated out and placed at the end of the issue, for long-term ease-of-reference purposes.

• If you wish to obtain a copy and you are not a regular subscriber, please order International Currency Review via our electronic payment system by pressing SUBSCRIBE. This will give a full-price order sequence. Then press CONTACT US and state that you wish to order ICR 34, #1. The single-issue price has to be at a premium to the regular price, charged at $200.00 per copy. Note:
Please ensure that you send a CONTACT US email to the Publisher at the same time as you press SUBSCRIBE, so that we KNOW to send you ONLY ICR 34, #1 and to charge you ONLY $200.

• The CONTACT US facility is found in the red box throughout this combined website.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• Please Make a Donation to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing global financial corruption investigations, which have turned the whole world upside down and have exposed the corruption which was intended to enable the geocriminalist syndicate to seize the wealth of the entire world. These people have finally been more or less completely stopped in their tracks as a consequence of these exposures. Your assistance will be sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. The Editor’s $35,000 Wanta bail-out money was not repaid and so has been stolen. It will be collected in due course and the thief will be appropriately dealt with, having so far taken no steps at all to repay the Editor’s loan funds, which should have been remitted on 11th June 2007.

• See the second white panel for details of our latest distributed intelligence publications.

• MICHAEL C. COTTRELL’S PROPOSALS FOR THE REFORM OF THE U.S FINANCIAL SYSTEM, AND HIS DEBUNKING OF THE IMPRACTICABLE AND EXPENSIVE ‘PAULSON’ PROPOSALS, PLUS OUR EXTENSIVE GLOSSARY, POSTED ON 22ND JULY AND REPOSTED ON 12TH SEPTEMBER, WERE AGAIN ‘SNIPPED’ BY THE NSA’S MENTAL DEFECTIVES. THE REPORT WAS REPOSTED ON 18TH SEPTEMBER 2008. THE REPORT HAS BEEN EXTREMELY WELL RECEIVED WORLDWIDE.

• PRINT EDITIONS OF THE COTTRELL PLAN: Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 11, #s 9 & 10, published in July-August, was devoted almost entirely to The Cottrell Plan and to the extensive Glossary of financial market and related definitions, which explains where so many people have gone wrong. International Currency Review, Volume 34, #1, also contains The Cottrell Plan and the Glossary, placed at the end of this 400-page issue for long-term easy reference.

• Subscriptions by serious observers and analysts to our services may be placed via this website.

• NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

OUT OF THE FRYING PAN AND HOVERING IN MID-AIR BEFORE FALLING INTO THE FIRE?
In reports posted since the US general Election, we have noted that while, given the imminent end at long last of the evil George Bush II Administration, it can be said that we have jumped out of the frying pan, it has hitherto been too early to conclude that we have yet fallen headlong into the fire. Our stance therefore has so far postulated that we were hanging in-mid-air, pending the arrival of further data, which would make the answer to this riddle more apparent.

Closer now to the installation of the new American régime, we have the following evidence, already publicised here, to suggest that President-elect Obama has not been a pushover for the Forces of Darkness that have apparently hijacked his incoming Administration.

We’ll repeat this evidence first:

• When Mr Obama visited the White House for the first time following the election with his wife, the Bush team tried to bribe him. He rejected this typically brazen, arrogant and crude Bushite attempt to compromise him, according to our special sources. The fact that Obama told the President where to get off is a known PLUS for the incoming President of the United States.

• We also know that when he was briefed by the FBI in Chicago immediately following the election, Mr Obama ‘blew up’ when it was made apparent to him that, under a long-planned CIA contingency arrangement in case he won the election (i.e., if the CIA Forces of Clintonesque Darkness could not rig the outcome to their satisfaction), the framework for his Administration had been decided for him by the mainly Jewish operatives who stand to lose most if corrupt ‘business as usual’ were to be thwarted with the installation of the new régime. Previously we reported that Mr Obama’s first briefing was from the CIA, but since the FBI is subordinate to the organised criminal ‘State within the State’ known as the CIA, that is a nuance that makes little difference. In subsequent days, he also received detailed briefings direct from the CIA.

• It is further known that President-elect Obama lost no opportunity to make it very clear that the Settlements process must be completed (the country recipients WERE paid, effective Friday 19th December 2008, in cash, the Treasury having guaranteed the payments from 18th December). Our information is that he has demanded settlement on several occasions. It is clear that resistance to his demands by the organised criminalists has been only partially successful to date.

• As further reported by this service, when impediments to settlement orchestrated by Gordon Brown became known, President-elect Barack Obama sent an emissary to speak directly with the corrupted British Prime Minister, who is an intelligence officer like his corrupt predecessor, to demand that he cease and desist, on pain of being arrested.

In June 2008, we reported that Gordon Brown’s treachery and dishonesty was exposed when he secretly flew to Belfast, having already said goodbye to President Bush II and his wife in front of the TV cameras on the steps of Number 10 Downing Street. In Belfast, he rejoined President Bush Jr. and his wife, and engaged in certain banking transactions in collaboration with Bush II himself. This was exposed after we posted the following paragraph in our report dated 18th June 2008, which was followed up and found to be accurate:

WHY DID BROWN FLY TO NORTHERN IRELAND HAVING EARLIER
SAID GOODBYE TO THE BUSHES ON THE STEPS OF DOWNING STREET?
We will now pose the following question. WHY was it ‘necessary’ for Brown, who had seen George Bush in the morning of Monday 16th June, to rush up to Northern Ireland so as to be in a position to be standing on the tarmac at Belfast airport, to ‘greet’ the President and Laura when they arrived in Northern Ireland? After all, he had just said goodbye to President Bush. Perish the thought that the purpose of his presence there might have been to open bank accounts. Perish the thought.

• President-elect Obama is known to have been ‘working with’ President Nicolas Sarkozy, who obtained the ‘mandate to pay’ from President George W. Bush at Camp David in October 2008 as previously reported by this service, to procure the Settlements without further ado.

• The ‘Daley people’ and other ‘forces’ out of Chicago want to be paid, too, you understand (do you?) and have, as predicted ages ago, taken the law into their own hands, which is why gunshots are heard in trading rooms, bankers and intermediaries are found sitting at their desks after having suffered heart attacks or with their wrists slashed, and numerous other unspecific ‘neutralisations’ are and have been taking place with increasing ‘Black’ intensity as the hijacking of the whole world by the most ruthless gang of intelligence criminals mysteriously still walking today stretches way beyond the globally critical stage.

THE ELITE POWER CONTINUUM’S NEW-OLD CONTROLLING TEAM
Within this overall context, however, it is a reality that the illicit trading team which is to operate seamlessly from the Obama White House – a team that the ‘Black’ operations intelligence criminals working for and with several domestic and foreign intelligence-linked counterparties put together ahead of Obama’s election victory and foisted on him the moment the election outcome had been confirmed – consists of finance operatives linked to past gross financial abominations, under the preceding two US Administrations.

• This ‘retread’ team intends to continue the illicit trading activity under President Obama’s nose from the White House throughout the new President’s term or terms office, but is facing severe impediments behind the scenes which cannot be reported on at this time.

The primary members of this latest manifestation of the Elite Power Continuum are Rahm Emanuel (a Kissinger operative, member of the Israel Defense Force, i.e. one would suspect him to be an Israeli Military Intelligence Officer), Hillary Rodomski Clinton, Joseph Biden, Tom Daschle (Citibank stooge, mentored by Robert Rubin), Bill Richardson* (ex-Kissinger Associates), Eric Holder (he who arranged the pardoning of Marc Rich, a.k.a. the very long-range DVD operative Hans Brand), General James L Jones (yet another Kissinger associate), Lawrence Summers (mentored by Robert Rubin, guardian of Clinton’s (frozen) accounts), Timothy Geithner (ex-Kissinger Associates), Paul Volcker (Rockefeller family representative yet Chairman of a Rothschild Wolfensohn firm), David Axelrod (a political consultant whose past clients include Senators H. Clinton, John Edwards and Christopher Dodd, Stalin’s grandson), and Susan Rice, ex-Clinton’s National Security Council.

* On 4th January 2009, Bill Richardson, Governor of New Mexico, withdrew his name from the list of candidates for confirmation, citing ‘a pending investigation into a company that has done business with his State’ (code for an imminently breaking corruption scandal). We speculate that Hillary was behind this rapid ‘exit’. What does Mr Richardson know, for instance, about Rocky Flats and the espionage of the Chinese operative Wen Ho Li at Los Alamos, we wonder? Just asking…

The notorious names among these operatives should be arrested forthwith and extradited to the United Kingdom to face charges of financing international terrorism, of economic terrorism, and of stealing from The Queen, and enriching themselves as a consequence inter alia of profiting from the theft of her gold on 29th-30th March 2007, which was exclusively reported, in the first instance, by this service. Protests from various quarters that ‘there is no-one willing to arrest these people’, ignore the fact that by publicising such information, the pressure on these soulless operatives is ratcheted up all the time. After all, the daily lives of all the familiar highest-level criminalists have been rendered intolerable and miserable as a consequence of what has had to be posted to date – entirely as a consequence of the perverse decisions that these people have made so as to be able to continue their terrorism financing operations. That has been their choice: they made their own filthy bed, and they must lie in it.

• Almost everyone in this cauldron has been compromised to some degree or another.

• THE PLAN: TO PURPORT TO IMPLEMENT THE G-7-APPROVED REFINANCING SCHEME WHILE IN PRACTICE CONTINUING CORRUPT ‘BUSINESS AS USUAL’: WHEN THE EDITOR SAID THIS ON THE TRANSATLANTIC PHONE, FORT MEADE PULLED THE CONNECTION, MEANING: IT’S TRUE.

Notwithstanding everything that has happened since Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill was fired by President Bush Jr., after O’Neill had asked him to release the diverted funds, and since we started to publicise the hijacking of the $4.5 trillion, and our subsequent detailed website exposures of the historically unprecedented corruption, the Intelligence Power has put in place an Economic Team, listed below, FOR THE SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE OF CONTINUING WITH THE FRAUDULENT OFF-BALANCE SHEET FINANCING OPERATIONS SEAMLESSLY THROUGHOUT THE OBAMA YEARS, from within the White House as though there has been no discontinuity and no opposition to this corruption had ever surfaced, and the Rest of the World knew nothing about it.

FOR THESE PEOPLE, DEBT IS AN ASSET CONTAINING CASHFLOW THAT CAN BE STOLEN
Beyond the standard criminal finance purpose, the mentality behind this intention (which is being thwarted) assumes that salvation is to be found through the issuance of yet more debt. For these people, who have overstayed their welcome, debt is ‘an asset’ in a sense not usually understood: for the practical factor here is that DEBT PRESUPPOSES A CASHFLOW WHICH CAN BE STOLEN.

Cashflow exists within debt ‘assets’: so these criminal finance operatives are predisposed towards the United States accumulating ever more debt, out to infinity – choosing to overlook the reality that another year or less of this behaviour will destroy the US dollar completely.

• For the dollar to be destroyed, all that is necessary is for one or two big financial powers to refuse to pay or charge for their oil in dollars: and such a development is IMMINENT. The parallel collapse of one or more huge US institutions would destroy the entire world financial economy.

The US dollar external Ponzi operation that ‘worked’ for a century, notoriously depended upon the willingness of foreigners to hold dollars. It is crystal clear to this financial sector observer who has nearly four decades’ experience that if the new US Obama Treasury does not proceed with the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme exactly as conceived, WITHOUT AMENDMENT – namely, that it is to be a PRIVATE SECTOR CAPITAL MARKETS OPERATION, not a Government operation that is susceptible to ‘insider’ corruption run surreptitiously out of the White House and the Treasury, key financial powers will DROP THE U.S. DOLLAR. The argument that ‘there is no alternative’ cannot be relied upon in the situation that will be unfolding in the first quarter of this year.

As the Rest of the World will KNOW at some stage soon (during the first quarter of 2009) whether the new Treasury is to implement the G-7-Approved Refinancing Plan WITHOUT AMENDMENT, any FAILURE OR FURTHER FOOT-DRAGGING on the part of the new Obama Treasury to adhere to the Private Sector Capital Markets Refinancing and US Dollar Refunding Programme as was specifically approved by the Group of Seven (G-7) powers and re-approved at the G-7 Conference in northern Germany in June 2007 when The Queen called for its implementation ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’, could lead to the unhesitating abandonment of the US dollar as the currency in which payment is demanded and made for exported oil, irrespective of all other considerations.

BECAUSE:

• Foreigners will take fright at the prospect of another eight years of a pariah US Government intent upon ADDING TO the overhang of obligations that is threatening to fall through the roof, through all the building’s floors and into the basement, with catastrophic consequences.

The new Obama Economic Team, whether foisted upon the incoming President or not, is DEBT-oriented: which is a recipe for catastrophic and terminal failure. The G-7-Approved Private Sector Refinancing Programme, which GENERATES ON-THE-BOOKS ACCRUALS THAT ARE TAXED AT 35% yielding massive ongoing real money accruals to the US Treasury, CREATES NEW REVENUE AND THEREFORE POSITIVE, TRANSPARENT AND TANGIBLE CASHFLOW that is available both for paying down debt and for urgent infrastructure rebuilding and massive domestic projects: funds that, because of on-the-books transparency, cannot be diverted, stolen, exploited or ransacked by ruthless, wayward finance operatives holding high office within the US official structures.

• It is the ONLY way forward, and everyone, from Barack Obama downwards, and at the highest levels of the leading financial powers, knows it.

ROCKEFELLERS, FACING DISASTER, FORCING BUSH CROOKS TO COMPLY?
As will be seen when we come to the deliberate imploding (by the Bush apparat) of the Madoff Ponzi Scheme Carousel, the two institutions employed by Madoff and his broker-dealership are JPMorgan Chase and The Bank of New York Mellon – the two US exotic financial enterprises which have accumulated colossal inverted overhanging pyramids of derivatives junk liabilities: indeed, JPMorgan Chase, which harbours the Terrorism Financing Center that we have exposed on this website, is where this immense assembly of fraudulent finance Ponzi Scheme scams began.

• IS’NT THAT INTERESTING?

Now, we are advised by ‘deep’ sources that the Rockefellers have ‘got the upper hand’ against the Bush Crime Family apparat. But this is ‘back to front’ in the following respect:

The practical reality is that the Rockefeller interests are in extreme danger of being crushed and reduced to pulp should the accumulated weight of the derivatives liabilities that is sitting on the roof crash through successive floors into the basement: and this will happen, as the Rockefellers know very well, if the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme creating real, on-the-books taxable revenues that cannot be hijacked, diverted or stolen by criminal operatives inside the American structures, is sidestepped, as the New Economic Team was (INCREDIBLY) set up to procure.

Hence, the Rockefeller interests (believed to be backed here by the Rothschilds as well) have been left with no option but to insist that the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme is finally kick-started in the private sector, and NOT via the White House and the Treasury, as the debt-oriented high-level fraudulent finance engineers had intended.

WHY THERE IS NO WAY OUT FOR THE FRAUDULENT FINANCE CADRES
More broadly, the US fraudulent finance sector is now facing the reality of collapse because by spreading the risk so widely, they have in fact generated an environment of open warfare both within the affected financial institutions, between the participants, between financial institutions, between investors and implicated US legal firms, in fact prospectively between every benighted participant in this US-instigated global panorama of financial fraud.

• Why did they spread the risk so broadly?

• Answer: Because it was assumed that if anyone tried to STOP the carousel (as has occurred), the outcome would be a financial nuclear explosion.

On this false premise, they therefore assumed, like professional Ponzi artists and losing gamblers in a casino, that their fraudulent finance carousel could continue sine die and that their formula for manufacturing false wealth out of nothing could never be challenged or brought down.

How wrong these ‘Useful Idiots’ were. HOW STUPID AND ARROGANT, TOO.

Because what they now face is financial annihilation and obliteration whichever way the crisis goes:

• ANNIHILATION when, against the background of the G-7-Approved Private Sector Capital Markets Refinancing Programme, derivatives outstanding are priced, say, at 1 cent on the dollar:

or:

• OBLITERATION if the entire inverted pyramid of derivatives liabilities collapses, destroying the likes of JPMorgan Chase and The Bank of New York Mellon in the process – and of course the Rockefellers AND THE BUSH-CLINTON FINANCIAL CRIME apparatus with them.

In other words, THERE IS NO WAY OUT FOR THE FINANCIAL CRIMINAL CADRES. They are caught and cannot get out with the money they thought they had made.

• But there IS a way out for the Rest of Us – via the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme.

THE DEBT-ORIENTED ‘NEW ECONOMIC TEAM’ IMPOSED ON OBAMA
Meanwhile the emergence of the new ‘retread’ Economic Team, for the purpose of continuing debt financing and fraudulent finance as usual, explains why the outgoing US Treasury Secretary, that devil Mr Paulson, was walking around with a self-satisfied smirk on his face. He knew that when he leaves office, it will be illicit, corrupt ‘business as usual’ – run out of the White House, with him, of course, as a corrupt participant. OR SO HE IMAGINED.

The team members, specifically assembled to continue the illicit financial trading operations out of the White House, Treasury and State Department under Mr Obama’s nose, are as follows (1):

• Timothy Geithner, US Treasury Secretary: President and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, former Director of Policy Development for the International Monetary Fund, Member of the Group of Thirty (G-30), formerly employed at Kissinger Associates, mentored by Lawrence Summers and by Robert Rubin, and a Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission member/participant. [Trilateral Commission is another long-range German front].

• Paul Volcker, to be head of a new Economic Recovery Advisory Board: Former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board under Presidents Carter and Reagan, the former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Chairman of a Rothschild Wolfensohn Company, Member of the Group of Thirty (G-30), longtime Rockefeller Family associate, and a Bilderberg and Council on Foreign Relations member, and North American Chairman of the Trilateral Commission. Volcker, as was previously reported, is also a Trustee, which may be assumed to be liable to influence his thinking.

• Rahm Emanuel, White House Chief of Staff: This man is a member of the Israel Defence Force (IDF), i.e. of a foreign military establishment, from which we deduce that he is the Israeli equivalent of a Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) officer. Why don’t they just install the head of the ongoing Soviet GRU as White House Chief of Staff, and be done with it? A hardline Zionist and a Kissinger protégé, former Congressman and a member of the Board of Directors of Freddie Mac, he also spent two years as an investment banker for Wasserstein Perella [see this report]. He was a key member of Clinton’s finance campaign committee and was implicated in the cover-up of the murder of Vincent Foster. His father was a member of the Israeli Irgun terrorist group, which blew up the King David Hotel inflicting a large number of British military deaths in the process.

• Lawrence Summers, to head the National Economic Council: Summers was US Treasury Secretary during the Clinton Administration, former World Bank Chief Economist, former President of Harvard University (where rising operatives are sent for indoctrination), Board Member of the Brookings Institute, protégé of David Rockefeller, mentored by Robert Rubin, and also a Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission member/participant..

• David Axelrod, Senior Adviser: A political consultant whose past clients include Senators Hillary Clinton, John Edwards and Representative Christopher Dodd (Stalin’s grandson).

• Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State: Originally a clandestine CIA asset who was used to infiltrate the Yale University anti-war movement, Watergate hearings participant, CIA operative, senior partner in the Little Rock, Arkansas Rose Law Firm, key figure in the Mena drug trafficking scandal, alleged architect of the Waco disaster, implicated in many deaths including the cover-up of the murder of Vincent Foster: world-class criminal operative and a Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission member/participant. Likely to order liquidation of the Editor of this service.

• Joseph Biden, Vice President: Senator since 1972, Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Chairman of the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, staunch Zionist sympathiser who told Rabbi Mark S. Golub of Shalom TV: ‘I am a Zionist. You don’t have to be a Jew to be a Zionist’, and a Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission member/participant.

• Bill Richardson: Former US Congressman, Chairman of the Democratic National Convention in 2004, former employee of Kissinger Associates, US Ambassador to the United Nations, Governor of New Mexico, Energy Secretary, key operative involved in the Monica Lewinsky Israeli intelligence honey-trap spying cover-up with Bilderberg luminary Vernon Jordan, and a Bilderberg and Council on Foreign Relations member/participant. THIS CANDIDATE HAS WITHDRAWN: SEE ABOVE.

• Robert Gates, Defense Secretary: The former Director of Central Intelligence (CIA), and Defense Secretary under President George W. Bush, knee-deep in the Iran-Contra scandal and its financial ramifications, named in a 1999 class action lawsuit pertaining to the criminal Mena drug trafficking operation, Co-Chairman of a Council on Foreign Relations Task Force with Zbigniew Brzezinski, and a Bilderberg and Council on Foreign Relations participant.

• Tom Daschle, Health Secretary: Former Senate Majority leader, Clinton lackey, mentored by Robert Rubin and a Bilderberg and Council on Foreign Relations member/participant.

• Eric Holder, Attorney General: heavily involved in procuring the Presidential Pardon for Marc Rich (the long-range Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD) operative Hans Brand), Deputy Attorney General under Janet Reno, and facilitated the pardoning of 16 Puerto Rican FALN terrorists.

• Janet Napolitano, Director of the Department of Homeland Security: Governor of Arizona, US Attorney during the Clinton Administration, instrumental in the Oklahoma City Bombing cover-up (which inter alia covered up the destruction of the German Nazi files kept in the Murrah Building) after she had declared ‘We’ll pursue every bit of evidence and every lead’, soft on immigration, described as ‘another Janet Reno’, and a Council on Foreign Relations Member.

• General James L. Jones, National Security Advisor: Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander, Special Envoy for Middle East Security, on the Board of Directors of Chevron and Boeing, NATO Commander, Member of Brent Scowcroft’s Institute for International Affairs along with Zbigbiew Brzezinski, Bobby Ray Inman, Dr Henry Kissinger, and the former DCI (CIA), John Deutch.

• Susan Rice, US Ambassador to the United Nations: Rhodes Scholar, campaign foreign policy advisor to John Kerry and Michael Dukakis when Presidential candidates, member of President Clinton’s National security Council, Assistant Secretary of State for Africa, alumnus of the Brookings Institution (funded by the Rockefellers and the Ford Foundation), member of the Aspen Strategy Group teeming with insiders such as the odious drug operative Richard Armitage, Brent Scowcroft and Madeleine Albright, and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

On a much more satisfactory tack, Mr Obama has selected:

• Mary Schapiro, to be Head of the severely discredited US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): Ms Schapiro has been Chief Executive of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and was Head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) during the Clinton era, where she ran a very tight ship. This is an inspired choice, as this lady’s reputation stands high; and as The Times, London, stated correctly on 19th December, she has a ‘deep understanding of both financial futures and the commodities markets’.

Given the imperative for the Wall Street Rule Book to be rewritten, as Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. has argued, this appointment is significant, indicating that Mr Obama is ‘not to be messed with’.

• Peter Orszag, to be Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB): Ordinarily, this appointee’s brief is to continue the falsification of the US Federal Budget numbers out to infinity. However Mr Orszag has been Director of the Congressional Budget Office, which enjoys a sound reputation, whereas the OMB has for decades been engaged in creative accounting, smoke and mirrors obfuscation, and the falsification of the US Federal Budget and background debt data. On the face of it, therefore, the appointment of Mr Orszag is an inspired ‘pick’ which, we understand, was entirely Mr Obama’s own: and a clever move this is, too: because if, finally, an honest Director is installed at the OMB, it suddenly becomes much harder for the numbers to be fiddled.

Very significantly, when presenting Mr Orszag to the press and the public on 25th November, Mr Obama predicted a ‘page-by-page, line-by-line budget review to root out unnecessary spending’. And, with his Electoral College landslide victory amply confirmed, Mr Obama proclaimed that he possesses ‘a mandate to move the country in a NEW DIRECTION, and NOT TO CONTINUE the same old practices that have gotten us into the fix we’re in…. As soon as the recovery is well under way, we need to set up a long-term plan to reduce the structural deficit and to make sure that we are not leaving a mountain of debt for the next generation’.

• This sounds pretty much like an Obama endorsement of the G-7-Approved Private Sector Capital Markets Refinancing Programme, which is, and HAS ALWAYS BEEN, the ONLY solution on the table, because only the private sector creates revenue: the Government ONLY CREATES DEBT.

• Separately John Podesta, head of the Obama Transition Team, and former White House Chief of Staff, was implicated in the Vincent Foster murder along with Emanuel and Mrs Hillary Clinton. At the time of this analysis, there was no indication that Podesta would see ‘life after Inauguration’.

• Leon Panetta, former Chief of Staff to criminalist President Clinton, was reported on 5th January to have been selected as Director of Central Intelligence (CIA). THIS IS VERY BAD NEWS. Panetta was involved in all the relevant ‘bad stuff’ under Clinton, and his ‘selection’ (imposition?) suggests a rearguard action by the recalcitrant criminalists to CONTINUE ‘running the money’ through the CIA if, as expected, the intention to continue doing so seamlessly through the White House, the State Department and the Treasury, is closed off (due to factors we can’t go into). If this suspicion is in any way close to the mark, it needs to be understood that THIS WON’T FLY EITHER. The situation is precisely as stated in the opening paragraphs of this report, above the bullet points.

Panetta is very familiar with the secret Halliburton scamming operations buried inside the CIA and the Pentagon which we helped to expose in the summer. He is very fully aware of the faulty Saudi Arabian artillery weapon which killed US troops undergoing training, and he knows all about those toasters costing less than $20 at hardware stores which Halliburton sold for nearly $1,900 a piece. He is Cheney’s evil twin. A HILLARY CLINTON PICK AND IT STINKS.

The US criminalists THINK THEY CAN CONTINUE WITH THEIR FRAUDULENT FINANCE. But time and global patience has run out. Should they remain under this mischievous illusion for long after the Inauguration, they will be BURIED, along with Morgan Stanley, The Bank of New York Mellon, Deutsche Bank and the other corrupt institutons. Such an outcome may be imminent.

• These fools MUST BE STOPPED. THEY ARE OPERATING ACCORDING TO OLD, REDUNDANT CRITERIA. Their model is a train wreck. They cannot continue this fraudulent finance. They think they CAN continue this fraudulent finance off-balance sheet. It is the job of Gold Badges et al to make them understand that the model has not only passed its sell-by date: it’s a grenade that will ignite a financial and economic holocaust with no parallel, affecting the whole of humanity. Clinton is a deeply evil influence inside the Obama camp and is evidently calling the shots. However, this madness CANNOT OVERCOME THE ELEPHANT IDENTIFIED AT THE TOP OF THIS REPORT, and neither can it overcome key factors that cannot be discussed right now. These developments all reflect warfare behind the scenes and cannot be taken as ‘set in concrete’ quite yet.

• There are more shoes to fall (i.e. airborne shoes to be thrown).

• WE UNDERSTAND, HOWEVER, THAT, ALL OF A SUDDEN, THE PENNY HAS DROPPED… Namely, that a calamity will follow any imminent failure to complete the Settlements and the Refunding of the US Dollar by means of the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme using transparent Capital Markets Operations on-the-books, yielding REVENUE, rather than continuing with such transactions off the books, yielding DEBT which is what Government participation in the Refinancing Programme can only generate. The prospect of a catastrophic series of events is of extreme global concern….

THE INITIALLY DELICATE POSITION OF BARACK OBAMA
Because this pre-assembled, debt-focused incoming Obama Economic Team was put in place and apparently foisted on President-Elect Obama (whether with his consent or not is unknown), anger among the CIA-backed Internet Blogocracy was switched after the US Election away from outgoing President George W. Bush to Mr Barack Obama, who was even being referred to in late December as ‘more evil than Bush’ – an amazing transformation, given the fact that Obama had not yet shown his mettle except as analysed above (none of the febrile ‘rumours’ about what he is supposed to have agreed to, had any substance as they were typically proffered by unaccountable ANONYMOUS sources and even if that were not the case, could never be verified): nor can ANY President-Elect promulgate Executive Orders, as has been suggested elsewhere, in a quite astonishing display of ignorance! But then, the sources for this nonsense are ANONYMOUS and thus unaccountable.

The likelihood is that Obama was suddenly the focus of vituperative CIA-fanned attacks precisely because, as indicated here, the Elite Power Continuum served by the Intelligence Power, which controls the US Government, intended to pretend that there has been no discontinuity – and to continue centrally-directed, surreptitious corrupt financial operations out of the new White House under Mr Obama’s nose, as though nothing had happened. Given CIA compartmentalisation, the Blogocracy cannot be expected to be aware that this scheme has already been torpedoed.

It also stands to reason that attempts may be made to blackmail the incoming President.

• However we have two points to stress in this connection:

(1) EVERY SINGLE MEMBER of this crew on the stage and off the stage, even operatives below the radar, is being prospectively blackmailed at all times. There is a ‘Black’ file on 100% of those who are chosen to walk onto the stage. So the fact that Mr Obama is almost certainly being blackmailed by the evil Intelligence Power is essentially a NEUTRAL issue. He has displayed evidence that he can be very tough, and his wife, who should know, has specifically stated that he is and will be ‘a hard task-master’. Therefore, in our opinion this man shows the character and ability to rise above this unavoidable hazard. The way to deal with the threat of any blackmail (which can of course be predicated on lies), even when baseless, is to recall that the blackmailer is invariably in a weaker position than the blackmailee, not least because if he uses his ‘weapon’, he then exhausts all his ammunition and thereafter becomes powerless. Therefore, the best course for Mr Obama, should he have concluded that he may unjustly be a blackmail target, would appear to be to steel himself to ignore any such pressure, and to bear in mind the following foreign example: which is not to be construed as having any implications whatsoever, but solely to make the point that the blackmailer is WEAKER than his target (especially, as in Mr Obama’s case, when the prospective blackmail may be based upon the odious transgressions of lies and false witness):

(2) Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin has been called a ‘vampire’ by his wife, no less. This probably refers to Vladimir Putin’s involvement in certain satanic activities, which would be fully consistent with his background as a Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) operative, as well as his KGB background. (GRU officers are also KGB officers: KGB officers are not necessarily GRU officers).

Mr Putin was further deliberately photographed within the past year kissing the bared tummy of a small child. What was that all about? Here is the answer: Putin, like José Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission, and certain others we could name, is a paedophile, a fact which has clearly been held in reserve by those forces inside the structures who believe they can or could blackmail him. By staging this ‘kissing operation’, Mr Putin ‘blew’ their chances. While the revolting image revealed the truth about Putin’s depravity, it also simultaneously destroyed the blackmailing power threat held over his head. Putin shrewdly calculated that by staging the kissing session, he could neutralise the blackmailers and would ‘get away with it’: which he has.

INCOMING PRESIDENT IS IN A STRONGER POSITION THAN PEOPLE MAY THINK
In summary, if President-elect is liable have false witness deployed against him by these odious operatives, that is not necessarily the end of the world for the incoming President. And the other side of the coin can be summarised as follows:

• Given that all the other characters on the stage will be serving at the President’s pleasure, he will be in a position to dispense with their services should they step out of line. In this connection, Mrs Hillary Clinton has already stepped out of line, according to The Guardian of 24th December 2008, which reported that:

‘The former first lady has wasted no time as she begins building up her team in preparation for taking over as America’s most senior diplomat from Condoleeza Rice’ in January 2009. ‘Sources in Washington suggested Mrs Clinton had embarked on an “empire-building” exercise as she seeks an expanded rôle within Mr Obama’s Administration’.

‘She wants a bigger budget and an expanded role for the State Department, not just in foreign affairs, but in dealing with global economic issues in the current financial crisis’ –

… code for she wants to continue ‘running the money’ as hitherto.

The Guardian further reported that ‘Mrs Clinton has told Mr Obama she wants to appoint high-profile special envoys. Her husband Bill has been suggested as a possible envoy to deal with Pakistan and India –

… code for positioning, reaffirming, revitalising and procuring the implementation (in part, by her CIA husband) of conduits for ongoing illicit financial transactions, and probably also for activation of that $2.0 trillion which at one stage ‘vanished’ into the bowels of the UBS office in India.

Other operatives (all of Jewish extraction, like herself) reportedly being considered by Mrs Clinton as she attempts to build up her State empire prematurely before she had even vacated her Senate seat or been confirmed (which she cannot be until she had vacated her Senate seat), include the well known globalist operative Richard Holbrook, Martin Indyk (a former US Ambassador to Israel), Jacob Lew (Clinton era head of the President’s Office of Management and Budget, and thus deeply involved in the falsification of budgetological numbers), and Mr James Steinberg, a former Deputy National Security Adviser to President Clinton.

Clearly, Mrs Clinton’s strategy is to inflate herself to the max ahead of Mr Obama’s Inauguration so that, as she imagines, he will find her impossible to oppose, or difficult to move: her calculations may also include the knowledge that President Obama would not be able to move her in the early years, not for 18 months, at least: during which time the extension of the illicit, fraudulent trading arrangements would have become embedded within the White House, so that the new President would be ‘unable’ to intervene.

PROMINENT RECENT ‘NEUTRALISATIONS’: IN MEMORIAM: LIST OF RELATED AND REPORTED
SUDDEN DEATHS (‘SUICIDINGS’) GROWING RAPIDLY: 5TH JANUARY 2009 WAS A ‘BAD DAY’
Before going any further, it is unfortunately necessary to review the various appalling publicised, mainly financial sector, ‘neutralisations’ that have taken place recently, as the struggle to procure the Settlements has intensified, in order to carry our investigation forward:

• Paulo Sergio Silva, aged 36, a trader for the brokerage arm of the Brazilian banking congolmerate Itau, was reported to have ‘shot himself in the chest’ during an afternoon trading session of the Sao Paulo commodities and futures exchange last November, stopping trading for 15 minutes.

• Kirk Stephenson, who helped start Luqman Arnold’s investment company Olivant Ltd., committed suicide, a British coroner’s court decided in December 2008. Stephenson, 47, jumped in front of a train on 25th September 2008, at the railway station in Taplow, near Maidenhead, located 28 miles west of London. The train was travelling at 100 miles an hour.

• Alex Widmer, Chief Executive of Bank Julius Baer, Zürich, aged 52, was reported by Reuters on 5th December to have ‘committed suicide’. Two unnamed ‘independent’ sources were cited by the Swiss News website 20Minuten to have stated that the death was a suicide.

Swiss police refused to comment on the death. A bank spokesman, however, was careful to point out for public consumption that there was no link between Widmer’s death and the group’s current [sic] activities, but declined to give further details on the cause of Widmer’s death, saying it was a ‘private matter’. The operative word here was ‘current’, implying that Widmer had been involved in questionable activities in the past: and indeed, further enquiries by this service confirmed that this interpretation is correct. Market sources have advised the Editor of this service that ‘the top Julius Baer banker was killed and we know why’: other sources have stated unequivocally to us that this was a murder, associated with the elaborate cover-up, retribution and ‘neutralisation’ operations that are taking place in the context of the Settlements crisis.

• Gavin Macdonald, aged 47, a top mergers and acquisitions banker, was reported on Monday 8th December 2008 to have died ‘from a heart attack’ at the London offices of Morgan Stanley in Canary Wharf. However he died on the preceding Friday night, so that his death was not in fact announced for at least 56 hours. Macdonald was Global Head of Mergers and Acquisitions for the institution. In view of the fact that he died ‘on Friday night’, there was plenty of lime for a ‘massaged line’ to have been developed to ‘explain’ his sudden death, which was attributed to ‘overwork’. Promptly on the Monday, Morgan Stanley’s CEO, John Mack, led tributes to the dead banker.

Mr Mack heads the institution within which a special suite devoted to the financing of terrorism, which we now refer to as the Terrorism Financing Center, is located. When the Provost Marshal attempted, with Department of Defense Internal Affairs assistance, to enter this room in October 2007, he was barred from entry on the orders of Vice President Cheney, to whom, ludicrously, he reported. You will have noted that THERE HAS BEEN NO DENIAL OF THIS INFORMATION – for the familiar reason, that the intelligence, which came from the actual ensuing investigation, is true.
Macdonald would of course have been aware of the existence of the Terrorism Financing Center, and may well have been considered a prospective threat to the ongoing cover-up operations. Mr Mack’s oleaginous tributes to Gavin Macdonald need to be considered in the foregoing context.

•Christen Schnor, aged 49, a Danish-born senior executive with HSBC bank, was discovered on Wednesday afternoon 17th December hanging by a belt, naked, in the wardrobe of his £500-a-night suite at the Jumeriah Carlton Tower Hotel, Cadogan Place, in Knightsbridge, London, having also rented a £390-a-day apartment for his wife and two children in Lower Sloane Street, in the same upper-class area. Schnor worked at HSBC’s Canary Wharf office. This death resembles that of Amschel Rothschild who was discovered hanging in a high-class hotel in Paris on 11th July 1996.

• Non-banking death: Michael Connell, an IT expert said to have been directly implicated in the rigging of George W. Bush Jr.’s 2000 and 2004 elections (since the Republicans cannot ‘win’ US elections without rigging them these days, as previously explained, due to deliberately arranged demographic factors) was killed on 19th December when his single-engine private plane crashed three miles short of Akron airport. Mr Connell was reported to have told a close associate that he was afraid that George Bush and Vice President Cheney would “throw [him] under a bus”.

It had earlier been verified that Carl Rove had threatened Connell and his wife, Heather (sounds familiar?). Mr Connell had flown to a small airport outside Washington DC on 18th December 2008 for a meeting. On 31st October, Mr Connell had appeared before a Federal Judge in Ohio after being subpoenaed in a Federal lawsuit investigating the rigging of the 2004 election under Karl Rove’s direction. The Judge ordered Mr Connell to testify under oath at a deposition on 3rd November 2008, the day before the election.

The White House is reported to have become extremely concerned that Mr Connell planned to divulge details of his secret illegal work for the White House. Heather Connell owns GovTech Solutions. Both GovTech and an IT firm called SmartTech of Chattanooga, TN, have been implicated in the rigging of the 2000 and 2004 elections and a White House email scandal.

In 2005, the US operative Andy Stephenson was poisoned with a substance capable of mimicking pancreatic cancer, after travelling the United States tirelessly exposing the wholesale falsification of election results using doctored software and rigged electronic voting machines, thus making a mockery of George W. Bush’s puffed-up boasting about ‘spreading democracy’ in the Middle East and elsewhere. Further exposure of this sub-scandal would be very liable to broaden and become engulfed in the colossal fraudulent finance unravelling that is taking place, which the criminalists are trying desperately to cover up, without success.

• René-Thierry Magon de la Villehuchet, 65, founding partner and CEO of Access International Advisors, was found dead with his wrists slashed on the morning of Tuesday 23rd December 2008, in his office at 509 Madison Avenue, New York. The French financier, an aristocratic society fund manager with a chateau in Brittany, was found at 7.50am with no pulse, in his office a couple of blocks from the Rockefeller Center. A spokeswoman for the New York medical examiner was careful to insist many hours later that it had not yet established the cause of death.

In other such cases, ‘sources’ have been in the habit of insisting that the death was a ‘suicide’.

The French financier employed a sizeable army of royally-connected ‘Alpine advisers’ to trawl the casinos, ski slopes and yacht clubs of Europe in frantic search of wealthy investors for investment in his fund, which in turn fed the demand for ‘replacement money’ for the Bernard L. Madoff Ponzi investment operations [see below]. M. de la Villehuchet’s connections and his own aristocratic pedigree enabled him to tap into a rich seam of intermediaries who helped to secure funds on behalf of Access, for onward placement with Madoff.

His ‘advisors’ included Philippe Junot, first husband of Princess Caroline of Monaco, and Crown Prince Michael of Yugoslavia, described as an ‘investor relations executive’. Families said to have invested with the French financier included the Rothschilds, other European grandees, and heirs to the L’Oréal cosmetics fortune, especially 86-year-old Liliane Bettencourt, daughter of the L’Oréal SA founder, Eugene Schueller, who is reported to have invested part of her fortune estimated at $22.9 billion with Bernard L. Madoff through the dead French financier. The 86-year-old holds a 30% shareholding in L’Oréal SA, which is the world’s largest manufacturer and purveyor of cosmetics.

In a letter dated 12th December 2008 to clients, Access International Advisors stated that funds, including its LUXALPHA SICAV-American Selection, were invested solely with Bernard L. Madoff’s investment firm. Data compiled by Bloomberg indicated that it had $1.4 billion in assets as at 17th November 2008. Reporting M. de la Villehuchet’s death on 24th December, The Daily Telegraph cited an anonymous source as stating that it was ‘highly likely’ that the French financier committed suicide, while a French newspaper report stated that he killed himself.

• Adolf Merckle, a German industrialist and billionaire, aged 74, was found on 5th January 2009 near railway tracks in southern Germany. The BBC reported on 6th January that Merckle had lost about 400 million Euros after wrong-way bets on Volkswagen shares. Herr Merckle’s business interests included Phoenix Pharmahandel, a drugs wholesaler with annual sales of about 21 billion Euros, Ratiopharm, a generic drugs company with annual sales estimated at 1.8 billion Euros, Heidelberg Cement, a cement firm with annual sales of 11+ billion Euros, the Kaessbohrer ski-slope equipment firm with sales of 183 million Euros, and VEM, a conglomerate of three engine manufacturers, with sales of 280 million Euros. The total turnover of the deceased’s conglomerate in 2008 was 30 billion Euros. The businesses employ about 71,000 people. Herr Merckle’s holding company had been in talks with banks to secure credit after it ran up high levels of debt.

In a statement, the family commented that ‘the distress to his firms caused by the financial crisis and the related uncertainties of recent weeks, along with helplessness of being unable to act, broke [him] and he ended his life’.

“News of Adolf Merckle’s death left me deeply shaken”, Baden-Wuerttemberg’s Prime Minister, Guenther Oettinger, said. The State had “lost a great entrepreneur”. In November 2008, the State Government signalled it would not assist Merckle after he sought a bailout. Herr Merckle had hired the insolvency lawyer Eberhard Braun and had threatened to initiate bankruptcy proceedings for VEM unless lenders provided him with restructuring capital, according to reports in December.

• WE DO NOT CONCUR WITH THE ABOVE: Merckle almost certainly ‘knew too much’ and appears to have been a victim of the DVD split identified by this service. It is inconceivable that a successful businessman as proficient as Merckle would have entered into one or more wrong-way bets with funds needed for his multiple enterprises. This ‘line’, publicised for public consumption, does not impress, and neither does it compute. Since the DVD and the Bushes HAVE LOST, we are looking at doors being slammed shut, and the slamming doors will be making quite a racket.

• The subtle point to be understood here is that until perhaps 5th January, the Bush Crime/DVD nexus thought they had ‘won’, which was an illusion AND HAS SINCE BEEN CONFIRMED TO THEM to be an illusion. Furthermore, they COULD NEVER ‘WIN’ without also destroying the Rockefellers through inter alia the collapse of JPMorgan Chase (a Germany-oriented bank, and the seat of the Terrorism Financial Center), which means that the Clintons (as the former President is of course a Rockefeller) could not in fact allow the Bushes to get away with their game. Therefore, ALL OF A SUDDEN, and all the more so in the light of certain developments, the Clintons will support the Settlements: which they cannot avoid in view of the reality set out at the top of this report.

• Steve Good, Chairman and Chief Executive of Sheldon Good & Co., a leading US real estate auction firm, was found with a gunshot to the head in his red Jaguar on Monday 5th January (the same day as Herr Merckle threw himself in front of a train near his Blaubeuren home in southern Germany). No suicide note was found with the body, suggesting thsi was yet another execution. Mr Good, who was Chairman of the US Realtors’ Commercial Alliance Committee, had a long-standing business relationship with Donald Trump, according to several reports dated 7th January 2009.

‘FEEDER’ PONZI FINANCIER MURDERED TO COVER UP ALPHA CONNECTION?
Concerning the case of M. de la Villehuchet, who was found at his desk with both wrists slashed, and a boxcutter and a bottle of sleeping tablets on the floor, we also beg to differ with the authors of the ‘received version’ promulgated so very smoothly for public consumption. This man, too, was almost certainly murdered, given his ALPHA involvement.

The La Tribune website stated that the financier ‘could not cope with the pressure following the outbreak of the scandal’, which is an understatement: he was desperately seeking replacement funds to satisfy his devastated aristocratic clients, implying in true Ponzi style, of course, that if such funds could by any remote chance have been procured, he would have disbursed them to refund the clients who had been severely affected or wiped out – leaving the problem of how to handle the new investors until further dupes had been inveigled to invest: but of course, raising any funds at all against the prevailing background, exacerbated by the globally publicised Madoff scandal itself, had by now become impossible.

So, yes, the financier was desperate. But one of the clues to the likelihood that he was murdered lies in the name of one of his funds, LUXALPHA SICAV-American Selection. Here’s why.

• The money invested in Madoff’s operations (THE MONEY ‘IN’) has not been LOST: It has been STOLEN – by associates of the George Bush-Clinton Crime Nexus. In order to understand this, several additional facts must be added here:

(1) It has been confirmed to us that Bernard L. Madoff was recruited into the global George H. W. Bush- controlled money-leveraging and laundering operations around 2005-2006: just when the $4.5 trillion sent over by the People’s Bank of China ostensibly to finance Leo Wanta’s payment became available for the highest-level financial fraudsters to play with. What a coincidence!

(2) It has been separately confirmed to us that Bernard L. Madoff had extensive insider dealer assistance for his Ponzi operations. He could not have operated without such assistance. The immense extent of this collaboration SHOULD emerge as the SEC’s investigations proceed:

• However this depends on the extent to which the SEC, SIPC etc investigations have already been ‘sown up’; and as indicated below, the initial impression gained is NOT ENCOURAGING.

(3) The Madoff operations formed a key component of the global financial corruption carousel presided over by the Bush-Clinton criminal high-level intelligence community gangsters.

René-Thierry Magon de la Villehuchet may have been murdered on the instructions of ‘Black Ops’ elements in order to prevent him exposing in detail the labyrinthine connections linking the Bush-Clinton Crime Nexus to the DELIBERATE takedown of Bernard L. Madoff and to the fact that the Madoff operations represented the Master Ponzi Scheme presiding over an army of subsidiary Ponzi Schemes. However the ‘neutralisation’ of de la Villehuchet cannot, obviously, prevent the inevitable connections being made between the Master Ponzi Scheme, the secondary ‘feeder’ Ponzi Schemes, and the overarching Bush-Clinton-CIA global fraudulent finance abominations being exposed in gory detail, as successive arms of the Octopus unravel and the extent of the biggest financial scandal in world history, and ALPHA’s role in it, is progressively unmasked.

• If those at the helm of this operation imagine that their intelligence connections will protect them in perpetuity, they may have a nasty shock coming to them, even though there may be evidence of a possible ‘insider’ operation to ‘contain’ the fallout from the ‘Madoff takedown’ [see below]. If our suspicions on this score prove to be correct, we would still consider the outlook for these highest-level US criminalists as grim, because the explosion is so huge that even with any ‘accommodating’ associates, they cannot realistically hope to prevent the audit trail from reaching their front doors.

• Also to be borne in mind is the fact that the SEC’s own-account operations, which are absolutely unconscionable for a Regulator, may be liable at any time to be exposed in detail, with the prospect of severe consequences for Mr Cox and others: so the SEC itself would appear to have a vested interest in ensuring that whatever emerges from the myriad complex investigations and the legal processes, is appropriately ‘sanitised’. Again, our view would be that it is FAR TOO LATE FOR ANY SUCH COVER-UP OPERATIONS TO BE WHOLLY ‘SUCCESSFUL’.

PRESIDENTIAL PARDONS WON’T SOLVE THEIR PROBLEM
Following the issuance of a handful of Presidential Pardons before Christmas, President Bush II is expected to ‘do a Clinton’ and promulgate an extended list of Presidential Pardons on 19th January 2009 just before he ceases to be the most disgraced President of the United States in the always disturbed history of the Republic. Observers expect a bumper crop of blanket pardons, including one for himself, which explains why Vice President Richard Cheney, of MK-Ultra notoriety, has been bragging on TV about how he authorised torture (satisfying his innate sadism).

But as mentioned in an earlier report, these people are financiers of international terrorism as defined in their own repressive domestic legislation and in the copycat anti-terrorism legislation promulgated in the European Union context and in the United Kingdom.

Their financial thievery and scamming operations against her Majesty The Queen, the sovereign of America’s supposedly ‘closest ally’, entitles them to be arrested, held in custody, indicted, tried and sentenced to the maximum period of detention, like the many thousands of bankers scooped in the autumn of 2007 and extradited to the United Kingdom and other European countries on charges of economic terrorism, as previously reported.

These former bankers received 25 years’ incarceration for their criminal activities, and many of the lawyers who rushed across the Atlantic to bail them out were likewise arrested as co-conspirators and accessories to the fact of these terrorism financing crimes, receiving similar treatment (as also reported on this website and of course never denied by anyone).

It follows, therefore, that this expected issuance of corrupt Presidential Pardons en masse will not get these criminals off the hook. They may rely upon the fact that their routine corruption has in turn corrupted leaders of European countries such as Chancellor Angela Merkel, who has been receiving bribes from George Bush Sr. in exchange for ‘protecting’ ‘his’ stolen and corrupt funds, or their fellow intelligence operative Gordon Brown, who has been exposed as corrupt, as we have revealed. But the fact remains that, at any stage in the future, any or all of these criminal financiers of global terrorism could be picked up the moment they step into the relevant jurisdictions.

THE SECONDARY ‘FEEDER’ FUNDS WERE SEPARATE PONZI FRAUDS
Stephen Harbeck, Chief Executive of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) who is the senior receiver of Madoff’s now defunct Ponzi-brokerage business, said on the 27th December 2008 that investigators were dealing with a ‘highly complex hybrid fraud’, elaborating that each of the individual investment accounts feeding the Madoff operations could be its own self-contained Ponzi fraud: and this is certainly the impression gained from de la Villehuchet’s desperate attempts to ‘replace’ the funds belonging to his portfolio of previously wealthy European investors.

Speaking on the steps of the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, Stephen Harbeck added: ‘We will trace funds wherever the trail goes’, implying that extensive use had been made of offshore tax havens.

A report in The Guardian on 28th December said that ‘forensic accountants examining Mr Madoff’s [multiple sets of] books believed he had regularly sent large sums of money to offshore accounts in the Caribbean area and Europe. ‘There are accounts at New York Mellon Bank that we have been looking at that appear to have sent and received money from offshore locations’.

Bank of New York Mellon is one of the exotic financial enterprises identified in our reports in 2007 which mishandled the $6.2 trillion of loan funds made available by Her Majesty The Queen and by Prince Al-Aweed al-Talal of Saudi Arabia. As this element of the scandal unfolds, the prospects of the highest-level criminals emerging unscathed is expected to diminish at an accelerating pace.

On 23rd December, US Bankruptcy Judge Burton Lifland ruled that Madoff investors could receive no more than $100,000 in cash compensation, no matter how much they lost – a development that will have come as a severe blow to investors such as Mr Walter Noel (Fairfield Greenwich Group), whose operations ostensibly lost $7.5 billion, while the women’s wear magnate and Madoff mentor Carl Shapiro is reported to have lost $545 million of his personal fortune [see our alphabetical list of ‘victims’ in respect ONLY of the money ‘IN’, below]. Judge Lifland invited all Madoff investors to attend a meeting at the US Bankruptcy Court on 18th February 2009.

PERTINENT QUESTIONS FOR THE BENEFIT OF ‘THE INTERESTED’
At this stage we ask the following questions concerning the financing of terrorism, and economic terrorism, which those whom Lenin called ‘the interested’ will certainly understand:

• What did and do the Clintons, Robert Rubin, Dr Alan Greenspan, Timothy Geithner, Dr Benjamin Bernanke, George W. Bush Jr., Henry M. Paulson, and Vice-President Richard Cheney have to do with Miapollo Investments Limited, Hong Kong, Apollo Management LLP, Eva Teleki, Leo Wanta, Olga Sarantopoulos, Golub Capital, Wasserstein Perella, Timothy Geithner (protégé of the guttural triple agent Dr Henry Kissinger), George H. W. Bush Sr., and Alpha [ALPHA] Bank in Greece: always bearing in mind who set up Miapollo Investments, Inc. and Apollo Management LLP for Bush Sr.?

• For what purpose did M. Jean-Paul Levitte, the former French Ambassador to Washington (now President Sarkozy’s closest intelligence and finance adviser), introduce a Mr Leon Black (not to be confused with a Mr Blue) to Crédit Lyonnais executives in Paris?

What can be stated at this stage is that the above-mentioned ‘worked with’ Mrs Hillary Clinton on the thieving of relevant accounts along with the Bushes, and that all are implicated with the ALPHA fraudulent finance and terrorism financing operation, which is still functioning. These fraudulent finance and terrorism financing operations were and continue to be committed in countries other than the United States, especially the United Kingdom, – so that all these people and their banking and intermediary associates, are specifically implicated in the financing of terrorism abroad. Under the Patriot Act USA et seq, financing terrorism abroad is a violation of the US legislation, qualifying the perpetrators to be arrested and incarcerated sine die, which is what ALL these double-minded perpetrators deserve and will, we believe, ultimately experience.

LONDON ‘SAFETY LOCK BOX’ RAIDS REMOVED THE COLLATERAL
When 300 armed Metrololitan Police surrounded and raided the three ‘Safety Lock Box’ centres located in Mayfair, Hampstead and Edgeware, London, on 2nd June 2008 under the command of Assistant Metropolitan Police Commissioner John Yates, stolen, illicit and other collateral assets being used for fraudulent finance hypothecation purposes were placed wholly out of reach of the criminalist cadres and the corrupt banking strata concerned.

As we reported at the time and have reported subsequently, the British police raids marked a decisive development, arising out of intelligence gleaned inter alia from bankers arrested and extradited to the United Kingdom in the autumn of 2007. It is unprecedented in our experience for such an enormous squad of armed police to attend such raids in Britain, indicating quite clearly to anyone not sitting on their brains that this was an operation of unprecedented importance and significance, involving facing down the most ruthless gangsters on earth. And this judgment has indeed turned out to be accurate.

MADOFF PONZI CAROUSEL THEN BECAME A PRIMARY SOURCE OF FUNDS
Because once the contents of the ‘Safety Lock Boxes’ had been placed out of reach (they remain under heavily armed guard, we understand), a central source of illicit creative fraudulent financing (of terrorism) had suddenly been closed down.

That left the Bernard L. Madoff complex of fraudulent Ponzi financing operations, and its colossal portfolio of feeder Ponzi self-contained fraudulent finance carousels as the primary source for the continuing flow of corrupt funds needed to keep the overall carousel going, with the exception of the Alpha operation (and probably several others, including the Omega operations). In summary, with the London ‘vaults’ shut down, the Bernard L. Madoff complex became the primary open source of funds (with the exception, as noted of the Alpha operation et al).

FIVE-HOUR EMERGENCY MEETING BETWEEN MRS CLINTON AND GEITHNER
When margin calls arising from the implosion that occurred in mid-September, when the $14.0 trillion of LOAN money held within the Treasury custodial accounts was placed into ‘lockdown’ (on Friday 12th September 2008) following measures taken on 6th September 2008 and subsequently in Britain, the Madoff-linked feeder funds and thus Mr Madoff’s own operations collapsed under their own weight. On 20th September 2008, the Editor received the ‘triple gunshot voicemail’. On 22nd September, Senator Hillary Clinton met Timothy Geithner, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, for at least five hours, issuing a bromise statement afterwards implying that she had in fact been discussing ‘economic reform’ with Mr Timothy Geithner – whereas in reality this was an emergency meeting to discuss how on earth to prevent the exposure of the fraudulent finance operations in which both were and are implicated up to their necks – in light of the developments since 6th and 12th September, and the volume of margin calls that were ensuing.

NEW YORK FED AND S.E.C INVOLVED IN THE MASTER SCANDALS
Among the relevant sources of exotic fraudulent finance caught up in the consequent maelstrom were funds submitted by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York under Timothy Geithner to the Bank of New York Mellon and funds associated with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s own in-house proprietary trading account, mentioned in an earlier report.

• For the New York Fed and the SEC themselves to have been involved in these operations represents a colossal pair of parallel scandals which should trigger indictments of the primary characters involved at both institutions – starting with Christopher Cox and Timothy Geithner.

When the Federal Reserve opened up the swap doors, they were taking in quasi-fungible assets (Treasury guarantees) and exchanging them for Euros which could then be deployed within the Swiss exotic trading operations. This revolutionary nexus of fraudulent finance, of economic and ‘financial terrorism’ offensives, is so huge that it cannot be explained in depth at this stage.

However we can summarise some of the stages of this immense fraudulent finance operation – winding up with the resulting dubious derivative fake ‘assets’ outstanding being ‘guaranteed’ by the Depositary Trust Clearing (DTC) Corporation, owned by the largest clearing banks, which has boasted that it has handled transactions ‘worth’ $1.8 quintillion, and has ‘guaranteed’ up to $700 trillion of derivatives contracts outstanding (taking account of double-counting).

BIG BANKS REFUSING CLIENTS ACCESS TO THEIR OWN FUNDS (= THEFT)
It is reported to us by respected and responsible market sources that one very large British bank, one very large German bank and one very large Swiss bank, in particular, are among institutions which have formed the habit in recent weeks of illegally refusing to release funds when instructed to do so by clients holding accounts with these institutions.

A case involving the UK institution resulted in the removal of a senior bank officer (also a diplomat) from the institution on Monday 29th December 2008, after the funds had been transferred from the bank’s Far East office to London, to fund a certain transaction.

• These banks are hoarding funds not least because they may expect to be called upon to fund guarantees entered into on their behalf by the Depositary Trust Clearing (DTC) Corporation, as an ever-increasing volume of related transactions ‘goes sour’. This factor is exacerbating the impact of the banks’ own corrupt off-balance sheet financial transactions on the real economy, and is the primary cause of the banks’ ‘lending strike’.

For the designers, perpetrators, intermediaries and traders involved in this biggest of all financial scamming operations NEVER THOUGHT THAT THE CAROUSEL WOULD RUN INTO TROUBLE, just as Charles Ponzi assumed that his classic scamming operation following the First World War could be continued ad infinitum. All concerned had and retained a vested interest in the continuation of this corrupt money machine, which has come unwound and will continue unravelling, contrary to their naïve and greedy expectations.

OUTLINE INFORMATION ABOUT CAROUSEL TRANSACTIONS
If we consider the Securities and Exchange Commission’s corrupt own-account transactions and supposedly borrowed (but now shown, post-Madoff, to have been STOLEN) funds, as our starting-point source of funds in an illustrative flow-chart, various stages can be described as follows:

• Leveraging of the sourced funds 3:1 in the United States.

• Transfer of the proceeds to the Swiss-based corrupt and exotic financing factory and issuance of bonds by the likes of Lehman Brothers, AIG, Bank of New York Mellon, Citibank and Morgan Stanley (funding for the bonds obtained from the Switzerland ‘money factory’ and direct out of the SEC’s own-account operations) at an 18% purchase price, for onward selling with a 30% mark-up, yielding an absolutely colossal 48% overall spread.

• Funds sent to Spanish institutions, especially Sr. Botin’s corrupt Banco Santander (which bought inter alia Alliance and Leicester and Abbey National in the UK), and probably onwards to corrupt institutions in the Southern Cone of Latin America, where Bush people have been congregating.

• Onward selling of the bonds, with a 30% backhander to the Bushes and 70% to other participants, including and especially the Bernard L. Madoff operations:

Since Madoff’s entities issued their own client confirmations and statements, Mr Madoff was able to juggle and obfuscate them with false accounting – a fact of real life that would appear to have been recognised ahead of the Madoff collapse, by Kingate Global Management, one of the ‘feeder Ponzi funds’ and one of the largest such subsidiary funds which had attracted some $2.75-$3.50 billion for investment in and ‘management by’ Madoff Investment Securities, Inc, despite having warned its investors that the Madoff brokerages ‘could abscond with those assets’.

In its fund prospectus, Kingate had warned that ‘there was always the risk that the assets with the investment adviser could be misappropriated. In addition, information supplied by the investment adviser may be inaccurate or even fraudulent. The co-managers [viz., Kingate and Tremont: see the alphabetical list below] are entitled to rely on such information (provided they do so in good faith) and are not required to undertake any due diligence to confirm the accuracy thereof’.

• This approach allowed Madoff to falsify the confirmations and statements issued to his clients. The Madoff Ponzi Carousel diverged from the ENRON operation in that ENRON employed a huge transnational firm of accountants, whereas Madoff used part-time accountants.

In parallel with, complementary to, and derived from such ongoing ‘money machine’ transactions, corrupt US Treasury and Citibank terrorism financing operations operate in outline as follows:

• Collateralized Debt Obligations (Mortgage Debt Securities etc) derived from Carlyle, AIG, Bush fraudulent finance and other linked sources are taken into the US Treasury/Citibank financing sub-machine to fund the master rotating derivatives underwriting machine – with the resulting new Collateralized Derivative Operations (CDOs) being delivered e.g. into the back-room operation of the complicit Bank of England (run, in 2007 at any rate, by a Carl Daniels, out of Birmingham but probably also linked to the US Embassy in London).

• Bank of England issues loans against the CDOs which are fed back to Carlyle, AIG and the Bush-Clinton Fraudulent Finance Empire and Carousel.

And the resulting outstanding derivatives obligations are all ‘guaranteed’ by the bank-owned private corporation calling itself the Depositary Trust Clearing Corporation, WHICH IS WHY BIG BANKS HAVE PROBLEMS, AND MAY COLLAPSE IF THE NEW ADMINISTRATION MESSES UP.

‘RETAIL’ INVESTORS’ FUNDS STOLEN TO FINANCE CAROUSEL PONZI FRAUDS
The ‘package people’, like the Madoff investors, have all been ripped off, too: but most of them can’t reconcile themselves to this reality. Earlier this year, President Bush Jr. (43) was quoted as having uttered evil words which, in translation, meant that these people can shout and scream to their dying day, and they will never receive a single cent. Many of these unfortunate victims have died without coming to terms with the fact that they have been scammed by these very self-same high-level self-appointed corrupt élite financial terrorists and fraudulent finance criminals that are being exposed by this service, as the biggest financial criminal crisis in world history unravels.

They cannot enforce anything inter alia because of ‘non-disclosure’ documents that they may have signed, the nebulous identities of the parties with whom they entered into their transactions, and the fact that, wittingly or otherwise, they breached the old Prudent Man Rule, which is not a legal matter but an issue of prudence which would weigh against them in any court proceedings which cannot be brought because the Ponzi frauds were structured so that no-one could ever be held accountable. That’s what we meant by the ‘Never-Pay Syndrome’ – invented by George H. W. Bush Sr., the physical embodiment of Lucifer on earth, and the technician with whom he has fallen out, Dr Alan Greenspan, whom the Bushite CIA dogs have recently punished by pulling down the House of Madoff and making off with the trillions and trillions of dollars’ worth of proceeds (money ‘OUT’).

Meanwhile, to keep the middle-class US investor victims from reaching in unison for their guns in their attacks, an elaborate, cynical Psy-Ops operation has been mounted by CIA counterintelligence cadres through controlled outlets and their possibly unwitting disciples for years, to keep all these victims expecting resolution at the end of the rainbow.

But their money has long since been STOLEN, and incorporated into the vast revolutionary self-enrichment Ponzi money machine for the odious Luciferian globalist elite – even as members of this discredited class are at each others’ throats now that their immense system of Ponzi scams is sagging or crumbling, and as the Bush Crime Family and associates make haste to shovel as much illicit money down to the Southern Cone as can be achieved within the very short space of time left for these people before they reap the consequences of their unspeakably cruel, selfish, ruthless, criminal and reprobate behaviour.

The above should not be construed as meaning that ‘the ransacked’ have no eventual remedy: but their condition is unfortunately probably as parlous as the victims of the Madoff Ponzi takedown.

• Whoever denies this is de facto assisting the CIA’s evil ‘Psy-Ops’ operation against the victims.

OTHER HIDEOUS DIMENSIONS OF THE POISON OF THE OCTOPUS
Of course that dimension is only one segment among a myriad past and ongoing scams, many of which are focused on ripping off officially sponsored programs at a Federal, State, county and city level via the courts, schools, parks and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-related projects, foundations, charities, cemeteries, hospitals, welfare agencies, nursing and home health care operations, you name it. These scams involve inter alia the use of ‘Asset-Backed Securities Trust Pools’ (2006-HES) and ‘Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates’ (Series 20006-HES).

Details of such scamming have been dug up by investigators into horrendous ongoing property-related scams in Arizona linked to NAMED high-level criminalists, and separately began to emerge during a recent Cook County foreclosure, in which the Judge ordered the bank and the victim into the hallway to ‘work out a settlement’: evidently the Judge didn’t want the relevant information to be revealed in Court, probably because his name was on the list and he himself was implicated.

Literally thousands of companies are associated with this scamming operation, using Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) as the transfer vehicle. In essence, these criminals, consisting of attorneys, judges, bankers and others, are simply transferring properties without the owners’ knowledge, prior to foreclosure, with most of the accounts in question found to be held with Fidelity Investments, we have been informed. The stolen property then becomes available as collateral for further fraudulent finance operations.

‘MAINSTREAM’ AND COURTS CONCERNED, FOR NOW AT LEAST, ONLY WITH THE MONEY ‘IN’
Concerning the Madoff dimension, in the foregoing survey, it will have been noted that while an estimated $50 billion is said to have been ‘lost’ as a consequence of the collapse of the Madoff operations, untold trillions of dollars came out the other end.

To elaborate: the US and global ‘mainstream’ media, as well as the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and the Bankruptcy Court, are ostensibly (to begin with, at any rate) concerned with the estimated ‘losses’ of $50 billion which have been widely publicised, based on the many documents filed with the Court (of which the Editor, by visiting the Court, obtained a complete set extant up to 21st December 2008, during his pre-Christmas visit to New York).

But that’s just the money ‘IN’.

NONE OF THIS MONEY HAS VANISHED. IT HAS ALL BEEN STOLEN.

What about the money ‘OUT’?

This, of course, as revealed above, is of a far larger order of magnitude, given the following:

• Leveraging operations doubtless conducted by Bernard L. Madoff’s office itself, perhaps at 3: 1, within the United States.

• Leveraging operations consistent with the illicit fraudulent finance operations that are typically conducted by the Bush-Clinton fraudsters, up to 40:1 which will have been conducted through Madoff’s London office, with counterparties in Britain. Switzerland, Spain, Austria, France, etc.

By means of the usual high-yield investment program leveraging and hypothecation operations, the base $50 billion will long since have been converted into trillions of dollars; and it is confirmed that the proceeds were transferred in large part via Israel to the Southern Cone of Latin America (Paraguay, Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil), where significant numbers of Bush-linked operatives and associates are reported to us to be congregating.

Significant proceeds will also have been transferred to Russia and/or converted into untraceable, portable precious gems like raw diamonds, held in Rotterdam or in London lock boxes such as those at Coutts Bank, used as the money-laundering institution for the Blair-Bush Deutsche Bank-Vatican Bank financing operation brokered by Bernie Ecclestone and laundered through Coutts Bank, which is The Queen’s Bank, acting as the clearing house and providing the operation with false ‘legitimacy’ behind Her Majesty’s back.

As we have seen, far from Madoff‘s operations having been ‘stand-alone’ from the gigantic Bush-Clinton-CIA orchestrated fraudulent finance giga-scandal that is unfolding, therefore, they formed a prominent and integral part of the overall global fraudulent finance Ponzi scamming machine.

Furthermore, the methodology employed to STEAL ALL THE MONEY (THE TRILLIONS, NOT JUST THE BILLIONS), was the standard procedure used by the US criminal intelligence community in all previous such instances – namely, to implode the operation.

STANDARD ‘BCCI PROCEDURE’: COLLAPSE THE ‘MONEY MACHINE’, RAKE OUT THE MONEY
That’s what they did with BCCI, walking away with over $9.0 billion clear. That’s the same model as was applied in the cases of ENRON and Iceland. And that’s what Bush Sr. ordered in the Bernard L. Madoff case. By imploding Madoff, the crooks GET TO WALK AWAY WITH THE LOT.

• That’s the crucial reality that everyone is MISSING. THE MONEY HAS ALL BEEN STOLEN.

No doubt the timing of the Madoff takedown was influenced by the consequences of the implosive events of September 2008, which will have triggered the thought in the minds of the top criminalist strategists that it was now time to apply the ‘BCCI treatment’, i.e. to close down Madoff altogether, let all the subsidiary Ponzi schemes and their investors flounder, make off with the ‘money OUT’ in toto, and (in Bush’s mind) deliver a body blow to the Jewish community and Israel at the same time.

POSSIBLE ISRAELI TIT-FOR-TAT FOR THE BUSH-TRIGGERED MADOFF TAKEDOWN
IN RETALIATION for this Bush-sponsored ‘BCCI/ENRON treatment’ of the Madoff Ponzi carousel, the Israelis have leaked supposedly devastating money-laundering and bribery information showing how Mossad and other Israeli parties reportedly transfer money from the Israeli Government direct into active US Congressional campaign accounts (illegal foreign donations), with funds also being wired directly from Israeli Government bank accounts into active personal accounts of Members of Congress. The sources publicising this information reportedly received electronic files showing bank account numbers, bank routing numbers and account numbers for NAMED Members of the the US House of Representatives, the US Senate, and even elected officials in various States.

The incoming data allegedly showed routing numbers of the receiving banks revealing that certain Members of the US Congress and of the US Senate have bank accounts in places like Barbados, Liechtenstein, Switzerland, the Turks and Caicos Islands, the Cayman Islands and London.

Electronic file data sent over to source from Israel was said to reveal names of leading US law firms and dubious front corporations all over the United States. However, significantly, ABSOLUTELY NO CONCRETE DETAIL, SUCH AS ACTUAL BANK ACCOUNT DATA, had been published by the 4th January 2009, the initial outline surfacing via a non- anonymous website on New Year’s Eve.

Whether this data ‘firms up’ into hard information or not, the context in which it should be viewed at this stage is that it could represent a direct Israeli tit-for-tat ‘Psy-Ops’ operation in response to the body blow inflicted upon Jewish interests as a consequence of the Bush-Clinton-triggered Madoff takedown. We are well into the ‘Samson’ period now: the gloves are off everywhere.

Even if the data is not confirmed, it surfaced specifically in the context of the Madoff ‘takedown’, albeit clothed by the leak source as motivated by disgust at the onslaught against the Palestinians, of whom more than have been reported were stated to have died. The source added: ‘I intend to publish this information, including names, dates and account numbers, on the web’.

• By 4th January, an estimated 260,000 Palestinians lacked water and roughly the same number lacked electricity. Some 80% of the population relies on food aid, requiring 400 food trucks a day into the Gaza Strip. Only 100 trucks are being allowed in, according to the BBC.

STOKING UP ANTI-SEMITISM: A CYNICAL ‘ADDED BONUS’ FOR THE REVOLUTION
Now, on the back of this, Mr Bush Sr. and his fellow Nazis (notwithstanding that the Bushes are German Jews, originally) will have relished the prospect of destroying large numbers of competing Jewish foundations, investors, competitors, and other entities and enterprises – reducing Palm Beach, which was infiltrated and basically taken over by Americans of Jewish extraction from the 1960s onwards, to a state of near-hysteria, given that Jewish sources with whom we are in contact state that many Jewish investors there have been ‘wiped out’. We received a report (see below) of Jewish people in Palm Beach having been reduced to selling their Christmas/holiday presents in desperate hand-to-mouth attempts to raise liquidity.

• In an interesting by-product of this development, certain Jewish foundations that have been wiped out or rendered useless in the New York area, had been financing revolutionary agitprop operations promoting homosexual marriage and the usual array of leftish Gramsci-tradition cultural revolutionary abominations designed to destroy what remains of Christian standards and culture, a key objective of angry, deluded Babylonian revolutionary Jews: the takedown of these people has put a stop to these activities in some instances.

As a clear consequence of the revelations from the Madoff scandal so far, latent anti-Semitism (as anticipated by this service) has predictably intensified. On 20th December 2008, Agence France-Presse reported from New York that ‘anti-Jewish commentary is inundating the Internet following Bernard L. Madoff’s arrest on charges of masterminding one of the biggest Wall Street frauds in history’ [sic] – indicating of course that the media will continue focusing on the Madoff dimension, as intended, while the much bigger perpetrators behind Madoff consolidate their getaway with the ‘money OUT’ as described in outline here.

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) reported that there had been “an outpouring of ant-Semitic comments on mainstream and extremist websites”. The French agency cited an ADL statement that ‘site users have posted comments ranging from deeply offensive stereotypical statements about Jews and money – with suggestions that only Jews could perpetrate a fraud on such a scale – to conspiracy theories about Jews stealing money to benefit Israel’,

Abraham Foxman, National Director of ADL, elaborated:

‘Jews are always a convenient scapegoat in times of crisis, but the Madoff scandal and the fact that so many of the defrauded investors are Jewish has created a perfect storm for the anti-Semites. Nowadays, the first place Jew-haters will go is to the Internet, where they can give voice to their hateful ideas without fear of repercussions’.

Among entries reported to be featured in the electronic files referencing financial transfers from Israeli Government bank accounts to bank accounts in the United States is a series of entries showing transactions between Loh’ama Psichologit to the Anti-Defamation League in New York City. A Google search for Loh’ama Psichologit shows it to be the Literature and Propaganda segment of the Israeli intelligence organisation Mossad.

The Editor has a friend who is Education Director of a Jewish School and Synagogue in a certain US State. In discussion about the misbehaviour of certain people of Jewish extraction some years ago, the Editor pointed out that these people seemed intent on repeating the mistakes of the past and on stoking the latent fires of anti-Semitism. The Editor recalls his friend’s exact response:

‘Yes and these people cause our community immense concern all the time’.

Our unsolicited advice to Mr Foxman is that he should direct severe criticism publicly, or behind the scenes if he prefers, to his own community, and should issue grave warnings to these people about the prospective consequences of Jews being identified as perpetrators of financial frauds in the prevailing climate. The fact that almost all the identified victims of the Madoff scandal that have been identified to date are Jewish, misses the point – which is that no distinction is liable to be made in the minds of those criticising the Jewish community, between victims and perpetrators.

Likewise, in ‘a very worst-case scenario’ that history again repeats itself, no distinction whatsoever will typically be made between those Jews perceived to be villains, and righteous Jews. That is the danger on which Mr Foxman and his friends should be concentrating.

In case some people are still mystified as to why there is warfare among the Jews, may we remind you of the Editor’s old story about the nice lady who took pity on him when he was employed briefly with the merchant bank S. Japhet & Co., St Swithin’s Lane, in the City of London, in 1959. It was the time of the Eichmann trial. The middle-aged Jewish lady used to sit with your young correspondent occasionally in the canteen. To the Editor’s naïve question: ‘What’s this all about? Eichmann’s Jewish!’ the lady replied: ‘Didn’t you know? A Jew’s greatest enemy is another Jew?’

DOUBLE-MINDEDNESS AND THE DOUBLE-CROSS TRADITION
In addition, one must remain aware at all times, as this giga-criminal finance scandal continues to unfold, of the ‘double-mindedness dimension’ characteristic of all key operatives. These people are ALL double-minded, in direct contravention of Jesus Christ’s warning on this central issue:

• ‘The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single,
thy whole body shall be full of light’.

‘But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness.
If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!’
Matthew, Chapter 6, verses 22-23.

‘The light of the body is the eye: therefore when thine eye is single, thy whole body also is full of light; but when thine eye is evil, thy body also is full of darkness’.

‘Take heed therefore that the light which is in thee be not darkness’.
Luke, Chapter 11, verses 34-35.

One of the layers of deep meaning here is that double-mindedness is wholly evil and represents, therefore, TOTAL darkness. It is often noted that the criminals we identify can be quite pleasant to meet (albeit there is always a spooky dimension to all of them). But their fake ‘niceness’ masks the fact that their orientation is in fact the opposite. They pose as ‘reasonable’, ‘decent’ people, but their eye is evil: they are Dark Actors Playing Games. Furthermore, they employ the duplicitous dialectical method at all times. Hence, in summary, they routinely:

• Say one thing and do the opposite;

• Double-cross their collaborators and associates;

• Renege on all their undertakings; and:

• Relish application of the standard duplicitous intelligence community ‘bait and switch’
technique to entrap their targets.

Now George W. Bush Sr. ROUTINELY DOUBLE-CROSSES EVERYONE WITH WHOM HE DEALS, and there are NO exceptions to this rule. The same applies to his duplicitous son. So do not be in any way amazed, sceptical or scandalised that Bush Sr. and his criminalist intelligence associates will have specifically pulled the rug from beneath their collaborator, Bernard L. Madoff.

‘MADOFF TAKEDOWN’ RELEASED TRILLIONS TO BE STOLEN WITH EASE
On the contrary, this operation has released trillions of dollars (probably running into the hundreds of trillions) into the hands of the criminalist operatives directed by the Bush-Clinton-CIA Octopus, while at the same time destroying a large part of the Jewish community and delivering a bodyblow to Israel in the process. After all, Bush Sr., of German Jewish extraction, consorts with the Arabs.

Therefore so far as the ‘German’ element of the Octopus is concerned, the Madoff takedown has been a superbly ‘successful’ operation – releasing immense resources ‘free’ into its hands, while undermining Jewish elements in the process. Don’t forget, either, that each arm of the Octopus is permanently entwined with other arms, locked in struggles to the death – with every component of the Octopus at various times or simultaneously at loggerheads with or fighting other arms, or all of the arms. After all, Satan is the author of all lies and confusion, which is the stinking River Styx of death in which these world-class criminals operate.

• That they will all drown in its foul waters is a certainty.

GLOBALIST STRATEGISTS DESTABILISED BY SUCCESSIVE EXPLOSIONS
So, despite occasional confusing appearances to the contrary, the global financial showdown that we predicted is now blowing up in the faces of almost all the primary Illuminati cadres and figures, with linked secondary explosions going off at intervals at an ever increasing pace – leaving the criminalist participants, for the most part, staggering around shouting and snapping at each other incoherently. Even so, there are still some of their caste, equipped with fewer brain cells than their comrades-in-crime, who would appear to have not yet understood that there has been a decisive discontinuity, thanks to the relentless exposures, and that the criminal finance community have been rumbled, and are being progressively brought to their knees.

Their Dirkeim Paradigm – after Emile Durkheim [1858-1917], who postulated that criminal behaviour is humanity’s norm and that ethical conduct is anomalous – has been turned on its head, so that the criminalists are now increasingly seen to be the anomie, with the Rule of Law, however degraded and corrupt, starting to reassert its primacy in the United States, at least in patches.

This development, to which this service has contributed, has come as a nasty shock to those criminalists who have grasped the outline of what has happened, because they had been in the ascendancy and in control for 25 years, and truly believed that their Criminal Republic had been successfully established and could never be challenged, let alone dislodged.

They thought that their fake wealth factory, based on hypothecating often stolen or diverted assets up to 40:1 (in London, for instance), would continue for ever. And they imagined that no-one would or could ever stand up to them, given their long-term success in compromising, through blackmail and/or bribery, almost everyone on their darkened stage.

Instead of which the successive bombs that have gone off and continue to explode ‘unexpectedly’ in their faces (and will continue to do so for many years ahead) have disfigured their self-righteous images of false rectitude, so that the whole world can now see these double-minded, two-faced rats for what they are: the greedy, decadent scum of the earth who have had their filthy day, and large numbers of whom face (or are already serving) extended periods of imprisonment, with 25 years apparently the norm. Others have suffered ‘neutralisation’ – the currently fashionable euphemism for being bumped off.

UNPRECEDENTED ADMISSION BY THE IMF MANAGING DIRECTOR THAT ELITE IS TO BLAME
It is against this background that one of the most prominent members of the contemporary self-appointing élite, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, has actually become the first of their number to acknowledge publicly that an attempt really has been made by this self-same arrogant, globalist Elite Power Continuum, to steal the wealth of the whole of humanity for themselves.

Specifically, the Fund’s Managing Director warned in a speech given in Madrid on 16th December 2008 that ‘social unrest may happen in many countries – including advanced economies… Violent protests could break out in countries worldwide if the financial system is not restructured to benefit everyone rather than a small élite’.

In a BBC interview on 21st December, M. Strauss-Kahn said ‘we are in the biggest crisis we have experienced for 60 or 70 years’, and indicated that the IMF forecasts due in January 2009 would be even bleaker still. However as the Managing Director of the Fund knows that the underlying cause of the crisis is unfettered fraudulent finance, stealing and criminality, he is also well aware that no forecast that Fund’s experts may issue in the foreseeable future will capture the horrors in store – given that, in the face, for instance, of all our exposures, the US criminalists have CONTINUED with their fraudulent finance operations, long after they have been exposed in general terms, resisting implementation of the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme, which will implement capital markets transactions on-the-books to refinance the banks and to endow the US Treasury with a stream of windfall tax receipts on an ongoing basis.

The intention, up to the end of 2008 at any rate, was to apply the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme but to run it through the White House – where, of course, it would be corrupted and would immediately revert to corrupt debt-generating fiat money ‘business as usual’. As indicated above, this intention has been thwarted.

Never before has a member of that self-appointed élite openly warned that its own behaviour was risking a global upheaval: indeed, never before has a member of that élite even acknowledged that it exists as an organised force for evil. Those of us who have done our due diligence know this to be the case; but it is unprecedented for a superior member of the caste to agree with us. French journalists inform us that the highly intelligent IMF Chief is known for his clear thinking and for his commendable verbal precision and directness. One may deduce, therefore, that this observation represented a blunt warning to the few high-level criminalists who were still seeking to resist the inevitable as late as the Christmas week, that their behaviour cannot be tolerated any longer.

M. Strauss-Kahn’s remarks echoed those of another ‘insider’, Senator Christopher Dodd, Stalin’s grandson, who, commenting on the banks hoarding money, told The New York Times in October that ‘if it turns out that they are hoarding, you’ll have a revolution on your hands. People will be so livid and furious that their tax money is going to line their pockets instead of doing the right thing’.

‘There will be hell to pay’.

It would appear that even high-ups among the self-appointing globalist élite have realised that the most prominent criminalist operatives within the folds of the Octopus have overstepped the mark – threatening the collapse of the entire financial system, having chosen throughout the build-up to the present defining moment, to assume that certain banks faced liquidity problems, rather than a SOLVENCY crisis (of their own making, but a solvency crisis nonetheless).

It is unprecedented for representatives of the Illuminati-associated structures to issue warnings against their own fellow perpetrators.

BANKS HOARDING MONEY IN CASE DTC GUARANTEES ARE CALLED
Meanwhile, as the fragile world financial economy hovers on the brink of catastrophe with, as Senator Dodd has correctly gauged, the banks hoarding the funds that have been doled out by governments, the main issue early in January 2009 was: why are they doing this?

• The correct answer to this question is broader than the popular generic assumption that the banks are hoarding cash in order to avoid bankruptcy.

The reality was that the big complicit institutions have been hoarding fungible cash-cash to post against the vast derivatives exposures (see above) (on the working assumption that it cannot be that the guarantees will all have to be applied at once), in accordance inter alia with their stringent obligations under Basel-II. In the United States, the two institutions in the deepest trouble in this respect are Citibank and JP MorganChase.

These institutions have not only hoarded the cash dished out to them by the Treasury under the corrupt Henry M. Paulson Jr., which means that Mr Paulson has been bribing them to refrain from disgorging the Settlements funds, but have also, as repeatedly reported by this service, duly held onto and illegally presided over the exploitation of the $14 trillion on-the-books LOAN money made available to them for the sole purpose of financing the Settlements by Her Majesty The Queen, Prince Al-Aweed Al-Talal, and the Chinese parties.

These LOAN funds were made available by these highest-level parties in 2007 so as to finance the Settlements and thereby to provide the on-the-books resources to start the aforementioned G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme of capital markets transactions which will liquefy the banks on-the-books, while providing the Treasury with an ongoing cascade of tax receipts at 35% per annum out into the future – all ON THE BOOKS, as opposed to the prevailing Durkheim Octopus ‘system’ of debt-oriented legalised corruption which has resulted in the proliferation of unfunny money out to infinity stashed untaxed in offshore accounts for self-enrichment purposes and the financing of ‘Black Ops’ adventures and abominations.

• The LOAN funds, held from mid-September onwards in ‘lock-down’ so that they could not be used for ANY purpose other than to finance the Settlements, were lodged within the custodial group within the JPMorganChase US Treasury suspense account with Citibank.

When the $14 trillion LOAN funds were placed into lockdown effective 12th September 2008, they were at once subject to a stronger category of control than is implied by the word ‘frozen’, which we can certainly assert metaphorically to mean that tampering with one cent of such funds would be tantamount to an act of war.

As soon, then, as the said LOAN funds were placed into ‘lockdown’, the stock market and related sectors imploded and threatened to collapse. It then immediately transpired, given this collapse of the stock market during the week ending 19th September 2008, that the $14 trillion of LOAN funds had been illegally deployed to prop up the illicit US interbank carousel and to provide the base for leveraging and hypothecation operations – facilitating corrupt exotic ‘business as usual’, which was ‘why’ the Settlements had been delayed for a good 15 months beyond the approximate stage that the LOAN funds were first made available to replace the funds that had earlier been diverted, stolen and/or encumbered, including the $4.5 trillion that was provided by the People’s Bank of China in May 2006 referenced in our earlier reports.

The ‘lockdown’ of the LOAN funds, buttressed by the backwash from the London ‘Safety Lock Box’ raids on 2nd June 2008, has driven all subsequent events, forcing the US criminalists to the wall (where they risk being shot) and lighting the fuse for the series of bomb explosions, which will be prolonged and will continue for many years.

Unsurprisingly, it was on Saturday 20th September 2008, within days of the 12th September 2008 ‘lockdown’ of the $14 trillion, that the Editor of this service received the ‘triple gunshot voicemail’ reported earlier. It can now be revealed that the message conveyed by this macabre voicemail was this: ‘We will kill you for what you have done’.

CORRUPT ‘BUSINESS AS USUAL’ PLANS IN DISARRAY
However the outcome has so far been encouragingly different. In the first place, Robert Rubin, the Clintons’ Citibank-based financial ‘minder’ (guardian of the Clintons’ ill-gotten gains, including illicit profits derived from the exploitation of Her Majesty The Queen’s gold which was diverted during the ‘unscheduled’ British banking ‘black hole’ shutdown on 29th-30th March 2007) – was ordered to ‘get your … out of Citibank immediately’, in mid-December.

When we followed this intelligence up, we were advised that Rubin’s presence within this criminal enterprise being no longer required, he had been faced with no choice but to hasten for the exit. However as the ALPHA operation (and possibly other CIA covert criminal financing operations) are still running, one can take it as read that this hands-on fraudulent finance specialist is still up to his neck in related activities.

On 4th December 2008, The New York Post reported the progress of an investigation of the rôles of Mr Robert Rubin and the former Citibank CEO Chuck Prince in what the newspaper called ‘a Ponzi-style scheme that’s now choking world banking’, implying that some ‘mainstream’ journalists have belatedly been following this website after all. The report gave outline details of a Federal lawsuit by Citigroup investors represented by the law firm Kirby McInerney, which had produced a 500-page report alleging what the paper described as ‘a complex cover-up of toxic securities that spread across the globe, wiping out trillions of dollars in their destructive paths’.

Investor plaintiffs in the suit have accused Citigroup management of ‘overseeing the repackaging of unmarketable Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) that no-one wanted – and then reselling them to Citibank and hiding the poisonous exposure off the books in shell entities’.

The lawsuit stated that ‘when the bottom fell out of the shaky assets, Citigroup’s stock values collapsed, wiping out more than $122 billion of shareholder value’, but that Rubin and other top insiders cashed out for themselves via ‘suspicious’ share sales ‘calculated to maximize the personal benefits from undisclosed inside information’.

The investigation conducted by Kirby McInerney was applied to amend and add new details to a blanket investor lawsuit filed against Citigroup following the exposures by this service in the fall of 2007. Consequent upon our exposure of the recycling of the standard ‘Bernie Cornfeld’-style Ponzi scheme technique, the amended lawsuit called ‘the actions of Citi leaders “a quasi-Ponzi scheme” to hide troubles – and keep Citi stock afloat while insiders unloaded about three million shares’ between 1st January 2004 and 22nd February 2008 for huge profits.

The Complaint named Citigroup, Rubin, Mr Prince, Vice Chairman Lewis Kaden, ex-Chief financial Officer Sallie Krawcheck and her successor, Gary Crittenden. The suit specifically stated that Rubin cleared $30.6 million on his stock sales, while Prince cleared $26.5 million, former Chief Operating Officer Robert Druskin grabbed nearly $32 million and the former Global Wealth Management unit chief, Todd Thomson, enriched himself by $25.7 million.

• The significance of this case is that it adds to the pressure on the criminal enterprise on top of all the other pressures, including the ever-present possibility (at the time of posting) that the LOAN funds provided inter alia by Her Majesty the Queen might be called at any time.

SUCCESSIVE WAVES OF DEFAULTS OUT TO 2012-2014
The bombs set off by the events of last September are exploding all over the place, and they will continue exploding for the next four or five years as components of the nexus of financial fraud peak in succession (the so-called ‘sub-prime’ element being only the first of the megaton nukes to have exploded to date). Still to explode between 2009 and 2012/2013/2014 into a chasm of defaults, are other manifestations of the legalisation of financial corruption, such as Credit Default Swaps (CDSs) and all forms of securitised fake ‘assets’, Alternate A ‘assets’, and ‘Adjustables’.

In non-technical language, the Credit Default Swap overhang matures and peaks in 2009, while the derivatives ‘originated’ on the basis of other residential assets, commercial property, credit cards and auto loans will ‘peak’ in disorderly sequence between 2009 and 2012-14. This means that even when remedial circumstances such as the actual implementation of the on-the-books G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme do come on-stream, high-yield residual financial sector nukes will still be exploding ‘unexpectedly’, taking the ‘mainstream’ media by surprise, as usual. There is nothing to be done now about this state of affairs.

THE STRENGTHENING OF BARACK OBAMA’S POSITION
Ever since he was briefed by the FBI in Chigaco on the day following his election victory, President-Elect Barack Obama, who ‘blew up’ himself when the duplicity of associates was revealed to him on that and subsequent occasions and who soon came to understand that his prerogative to appoint whom he liked to serve in his Administration had been somewhat pre-empted for him by the prior construction of a shell Administration for the Elite Power Continuum for him to accept on a ‘take-it-or-leave-it’ basis, Mr Barack Obama has demanded finalisation of the Settlements.

And as noted, he has himself been responsible for two of the most critical appointments – to the leadership of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Office of Management and Budget.

THE FATE OF DELUDED HOLD-OUTS AGAINST THE SETTLEMENTS
As his position strengthened with the waning of the CIA’s sterile rearguard Bush-Cheney Internet campaign to discredit Barack Obama, and the Electoral College outcome on 11th December proved favourable to the President-Elect as expected, the President-Elect’s insistence on completion of the Settlements, to the fury of the Bush criminalists, has driven events at a hectic pace.

On Friday 18th December, Mr Obama warned that some 100 key people – including Attorneys whose firms must distribute the Settlement funds to the 1,000-odd Trustees for onward remittance – who have been protected hitherto, would cease to enjoy all immunity from the consequences of their complicity in financial crimes with effect from Monday 22nd December: indicative of the fact that if they were to impede the Settlements (as always, on the orders of Bush Sr.), they would be arrested, like the scores of bankers in Europe who have been arrested in successive waves over the past several weeks, and since the fall of 2007. On 18th December we received a report, for instance, to the effect that a further 12 ‘sleepers’ impeding the Settlements had been cuffed.

On 16th December 2008, it was reported/confirmed that five key Trustees in Europe had been arrested; and it is believed that these people were ‘taken down’ for prolonged periods.

• In addition, a not inconsiderable number of ‘sleepers’ and others taking orders from the imploding George Bush Sr. apparat have, in recent weeks been ‘neutralised’ – this being the currently fashionable euphemism for ‘liquidated’.

On 23rd December (5.35pm) the Editor was advised that a significant number of bankers and others had been ‘arrested’, taken away, ‘neutralised’ (liquidated) on the preceding day, in line with similar operations on the two preceding days and earlier. On 26th December 2008, it was confirmed to us that President Sarkozy, on behalf of all the European Union’s ‘Member States’, had issued ‘a final ultimatum’ to the criminalist US authorities for the Settlements payouts to be finalised by the end of the year (when Sarkozy’s six-month rotating EU Presidency came to an end), although as President of France, his ‘mandate to pay’ extracted from President George W. Bush at Camp David would not be affected (as the White House may have assumed). It was also confirmed to us from the United States that, despite everything that has happened, President George W. Bush STILL thought he was in charge of the Settlements process, given that the familiar blocking games played by the Bushes all along continued seamlessly following Sarkozy’ acquiring his ‘mandate to pay’.

On 28th December 2008, in a repetition of the familiar sterile obfuscating delay antics, a Trustee reported several instances of Trustees failing to turn up at banks for payouts, as has often been reported all along (one of the standard sabotage techniques) and that ‘they are working furiously to get everyone in place’, with ‘feelings really frayed right now’ – not that they have not been frayed ever since this service became involved with this crisis.

But for such a source to mention ‘frayed feelings’, giving the standard habit of understatement, reflected the extreme fractiousness of the situation, which has led to many sudden deaths, with more in the pipeline, according to our information. However, so successful has the Bush-Cheney disinformation, diversion, expectations-manipulating ‘Psy-Ops’ apparatus been throughout this coordinated operation to scam every target imaginable, that none of this unspecific ‘information’ can ever be relied upon: it is foolhardy for people to do so. Such ‘information’ can only become reliable when backed up by indpendent sources, as in the case of the jailed bankers in the UK.

The authorities under the incoming Administration would have the option of foreclosing on both Citibank and JPMorganChase in the event (as appeared to be the case immediately ahead of the Christmas holidays) of their continued intransigence, after partial completion of the Settlements in favour of ‘the countries’ on Thursday 18th December, which was the date when the US Treasury guaranteed value and the country recipients were said to have been ‘paid out’.

SHOUTING MATCH OVER PAYOUTS TO U.S.-BASED RECIPIENTS
But when it came to paying out the US-based recipients, the Editor gathered that a blazing row, or ‘shouting match’ developed, involving recalcitrant American refusals to disgorge tranches of the LOAN funds to US recipients. This row may have focused inter alia on the illegality of Citibank and other institutions even contemplating further misapplication of elements of the $14 trillion in ‘lockdown’ which could NOT be touched except for Settlements disbursement purposes.

According to our sources, the explosive international slanging and shouting match started on Friday 19th December 2008, when the US tranches of the Settlements were stalled, and was still continuing on Saturday 20th December, immediately ahead of the Editor’s return to London from New York on Sunday 21st December.

In the second place, the bailout providing loans worth $17.4 billion to Detroit automakers reflected NOT the desperate plight of the US motor manufacturers, but rather alleged EXTREME FEAR in the White House and the Treasury that if General Motors and Chrysler were to be placed into Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the consequent investigations would expose the fact that these household names’ balance sheets are stuffed with fraudulent securitised derivative assets, and that their accounts had been falsified for years since such dubious assets had been treated for accounting purposes as though they are ‘real’ assets – which is not the case, as they are worthless, although the system of legalised corruption dictates otherwise.

UGLY SITUATIONS FACING KEY PLAYERS
Any Trustee appointed under Chapter 11 procedures would be bound to report such information, which would set off colossal further aftershocks throughout the financial system, coming on top of the Madoff takedown which will continue setting off landmines way out into the future, despite any evidence of ‘insider’ attempts to contain the fallout – not least within the offices of the Securities and Exchange Commission, which allowed these corrupt practices to flourish (even as the SEC has been participating in the fraudulent finance trading operations on own account), in the context of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 and the associated weakening of the stringent US securities legislation of 1933 and 1934, which, however, still applies and should have been enforced.

The fact that the Deposit Trust Clearing Corporation (DTCC) has been ‘guaranteeing’ these false securitised ‘derivatives’ assets, and has even boasted about clearing $1.8 quintillion of such junk as noted above, does NOT ‘guarantee’ the ‘value’ of such assets, given that they are intrinsically worthless: it simply confirms that the legalisation of US financial corruption has comprehensively failed to disguise the real-world reality that such false ‘assets’ are both illegitimate AND worthless, even though the legitimisation of corruption prescribes the opposite.

DECISION TO APPLY THE ‘BCCI/ICELAND/ENRON TREATMENT’ TO MADOFF
In the third place (but perhaps slightly in the wrong order), on Thursday 11th December, which we believe is about when the carousel finally ran out of fresh ‘IN’ resources altogether – as the events of mid-September had led to the drying-up of the secondary market, thus precluding the tapping of the secondary and tertiary markets for prop-up funds – all of the leading corrupted financial players suddenly discovered, in sync, that the cupboard was bare. Faced with this prospect, the Bush Sr. Crime and CIA criminal enterprise apparat is believed to have decided to apply the ‘BCCI treatment’ to the Madoff Ponzi scamming machine and its subsidiary Ponzi operations – just as it had earlier pulled the plug on ENRON and, more recently, Iceland, a conveniently located fraudulent finance platform established/exploited by Bushite associates (e.g. Khaled Aziz, Hospice Trust, etc).

The routine practice appears to be that as soon as one of these Ponzi fraudulent finance carousels reaches a tipping point, the criminal finance engineers deliberately allow the fake money machine to implode, rakes all the cash out for itself, and leaves all the deluded investors and (in this case) the subsidiary Ponzi investor funnels dangling, like the ‘package people’.

One consequence of this development was that lame-duck President George W. (Dog) Bush Jr. was reported to have asked his lawyers whether he could continue to stall on the Settlements (so that he could wind up stealing some more money) and what would the likely consequences be for him personally if he did so. Our sources informed us that his corrupt lawyers responded words to the effect: ‘Well, you’ve got away with it so far, so what’s the problem?’

By responding corruptly in this manner, the President’s co-conspiratorial Attorneys revealed how far behind the curve and how compartmentalised they have remained, since the reality is that Bush II has NOT ‘got away with it’ and is manifestly defeated and stretched flat out on the rack, despite theatrical appearances to the contrary. The Bushes may THINK that they have raked out all the money and have ‘won’, but as explained above, they are liable to lose the lot.

In any case, since President Sarkozy obtained his ‘mandate to pay’, the outgoing President Bush has not been in control of events, even though it is clear from this episode and from his behaviour generally that he thought he was still in charge. Maybe it all depends on his daily intake.

BELATED OPERATION TO DISCREDIT PRESIDENT SARKOZY
Meanwhile an operation was noted in December 2008 apparently to destabilise President Nicolas Sarkozy and to place him under a cloud, focused on the huge Clearstream corruption and money-laundering scandal that has grown a new leg – with inter alia the revelation, extracted from widely available Clearstream historical spreadsheets, that Sarkozy holds or held two secret accounts in false names, Paul de Nagy and Stéphane Bosca. We were suspicious of this sudden eruption, given that the ‘intelligence’ proffered and pilfered for international public consumption was extracted from documentation that has been circulating for several years; so it represented nothing new.

But specifically, it was reported on 18th December 2008 that Sarkozy might soon be facing renewed charges that he was at the receiving end of corrupt foreign funds through the Luxembourg-based Clearstream entity. President Sarkozy’s father’s full name was M. Nicolas Paul Stéphane Sarkösy de Nagy-Bosca. The Clearstream money-laundering scandal connects directly with American political and ‘Black Ops’ financing operations through Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), Banco Ambrosiano (the Vatican: see the preceding report), Bahrain International Bank (associated with the deceased – as of 26th December 2001 – Osama Bin Laden), and Bank Menatep, the KGB entity previously headed by the disgraced and then imprisoned covert Soviet KGB operative and oligarch and former minor Gorbachëv-era Minister, Mikhail Khodorkovsky.

The Clearstream data of which this service has been aware for several years contain accurate information, indicating that allegations by the Sarkozy entourage that the spreadsheets that have been in circulation for the past several years are forgeries, are false. M. Sarkozy was reported in February 2007 and earlier to have received corrupt funds from Zug-based Marc Rich, a.k.a. Hans Brand, the long-range DVD operative and corrupt financier who was notoriously ‘pardoned’ by President Clinton during his last hours in office (see above). The man who is now President of France was also alleged in 2007 to have received funds from Russian-Israeli mafiya accounts of Bank Menatep. However the ‘surfacing’ of this OLD intelligence is obviously suspect.

WHAT PRESIDENT BUSH JR. WAS REALLY UP TO IN BAGHDAD: TRYING TO STEAL MONEY
On Saturday 13th December, Bush Jr. appeared in Baghdad where, on 16th December 2008, he narrowly escaped being hit on the head by what have become the most famous footwear items in history – thrown by Muntadhar al-Zaidi, the courageous Iraqi TV journalist working for al-Baghdadia satellite TV station, who followed and reported on the US Apache helicopters’ trails of death and destruction, and has been a relentless exposer of the gross, Nazi-style abominations and atrocities committed by the US forces in Iraq. Throwing one’s shoe at a person is the ultimate insult in the Arab world and also anywhere in Europe from Austria eastwards.

The first airborne shoe was accompanied by the following pertinent imprecation:

‘This is the farewell kiss, you dog’.

At least, that is what was widely reported. Less widely reported was what the journalist shouted to accompany the arrival of the second airborne shoe:

‘This is from the widows, the orphans and those who were killed in Iraq’.

As the Iraqi and Arab satellite stations broadcast this expression of pent-up fury and outrage at the brutality of the invading and occupying US forces, and of the CIA’s cadres with their hideous ‘Black’ abominations from Abu Ghraib onwards, regional TV stations and media websites were inundated with messages of adulation. The Guardian summarised the content of these messages thus:

‘Bush is a mass murderer and a war criminal who sneaked into Baghdad. He killed a million Iraqis. He burned the country down’.

Ostensibly, ‘the Dog’ was in Baghdad to sign off on the negotiated troop withdrawal arrangements, this being presumably Bush II’s final Iraq-related act as the most despised US President in history. But in actual fact, what Mr Bush was really more interested in, was stealing money.

• Two impeccable sources informed us on 16th December 2008 that he attempted to steal a large sum while in Iraq, only to be informed that the funds had been placed beyond his reach, under the protection of the World Court.

So the workings of the devious mind of this cunning little criminal dog-snake had been anticipated in advance, given that it would have been known that he was to make a flying visit to Baghdad over the weekend of 13th-14th December 2008 (even though the visit was ‘secret’). Mr Bush’s failure to steal money from the Central Bank of Iraq or indeed from any other component of the Iraqi financial infrastructure may account for the man’s ‘crushed’ appearance during subsequent TV broadcasts.

NO DENIAL OF THE MORGAN STANLEY TERRORISM FINANCING CENTER
While all this was developing, our report exposing the office suite within Morgan Stanley known from the relevant investigation in 2007 to be the Terrorism Financing Center specialising in the financing of the projection by the corrupt revolutionary United States of secret ‘Black Ops’ global terrorism operations headed by the US-created hydra called Al-Qaeda, had already been in the public domain for OVER THREE WEEKS. This exposure, which stemmed from our knowledge that the Provost Marshal was refused entry to this office suite with his accompanying personnel when he attended Morgan Stanley’s premises in October 2007, and from the findings of the subsequent official but unreported investigation, prompted the following response:

• NO RESPONSE AT ALL:
From any of the CIA-controlled disinformation or confusion-mongering websites, which obviously, being CIA-backed outlets, could not ‘touch it’, with one exception. It was suggested by an observer that the breaking of this information was worthy of a Pullitzer Prize (although simple Brits don’t really understand what on earth that is). The comment was accompanied by the add-on that ‘it had better be true, or one wouldn’t want to be in Story’s shoes’. Well, Story remains, at least as of the time of writing, in the new shoes that he bought in order to be properly dressed for his fourth daughter’s candle-lit wedding in our 11th century parish church on 13th December 2008.

• NO REFUTATION WHATSOEVER from any Fourth or Fifth estate source. Manifestly, if the report were untrue (which is not the case!), it would have been necessary at some stage to discredit it. But this has not happened, because the report is true, as you would expect.

Now it is a fact that this information, which had been known for over a year by our sources, who had previously been precluded from revealing it to us, was made available for a very good reason. Even though, as indicated above, the report has so far been confined to this website, that doesn’t matter because of the website’s immense global coverage. The reality is that this information is out in the public domain, so that governments worldwide have picked it up and know the truth of the matter (if it had been withheld from them by their penetrated intelligence services).

AL-QAEDA WILL HAVE TO BE CLOSED DOWN: BY BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
It can therefore only be a matter of time before Al-Qaeda is wound up.

• And who do you suppose has been positioned to achieve just that outcome?

• Why, Barack Hussein Obama, of course. Let us explain, in case this is not clear.

Treating the 25 years of the Reagan-Bush-Clinton ascendancy as the Thesis (Clinton has all along ‘worked for’ Bush Sr., but carries the opposite (dialectical) political label), we are now presented with the purported Antithesis under President Barack Obama.

• Although the Elite Power Continuum remains in place, the team members have been switched.

The socialist-internationalist British Prime Minister Gordon Brown pronounced on 14th December that Al-Qaeda was planning 20 separate terrorist attacks on civilian targets in the United Kingdom. However being also a blackmailable intelligence officer, Mr Brown knows perfectly well, or should know, that Al-Qaeda has been financed inter alia via the Morgan Stanley-based Terrorism Financing Center (our name for the abominable suite within that corrupt financial enterprise in Midtown New York City). It therefore follows that Brown may be a duplicitous deceiver who knows the truth but hasn’t got the guts to expose it, because he is being blackmailed, or is just plain ignorant due to compartmentalisation or because his handlers have been instructed to leave him in ignorance – which might be the sort of behaviour to be expected from the current Germanophile head of MI6.

As a result of the London ‘safety lock box’ raids conducted by 300 armed Metropolitan Police officers on 2nd June 2008, details of certain secret offshore bank accounts with Henry Ansbacher, British Virgin Islands, a preferred DVD money-laundering and bribery payment recipient bank, were discovered. This fact places a questionmark over the futures of certain key UK figures.

Another possible explanation for Brown’s remarks would be that they represented a feeble attempt to discredit our report: evidently, Mr Story’s exposure of the Morgan Stanley Terrorism Financing Center ‘cannot be true, because why would Morgan Stanley be interested in mounting 20 attacks against America’s supposedly closest ally’?

Anyone who thinks like this hasn’t begun to grasp:

(a) That the so-called ‘Special Relationship’ has been degraded and corroded by the wayward and relentlessly evil operations of the DVD segment of the US Intelligence Power; and:

(b) That the deviousness of the evil DOUBLE-MINDEDNESS of these people is infinite: they have NO WAY of combating the truth other than with more lies. IF YOU HAVEN’T UNDERSTOOD THE DOUBLE-MINDEDNESS DIMENSION BY NOW, YOU’LL NEVER UNDERSTAND ANYTHING.

Anyway, our revelation of the existence of the Morgan Stanley Terrorism Financing Center also represented yet another HORRIBLE BOMB EXPLOSION in the faces of the recalcitrant criminalist revolutionary perpetrators, since, by definition, it signalled not only that Al-Qaeda would have to be wound up, but, even more to the point in our context, that:

• The United States’ reprobate and wholly inexcusable covert ‘Black Ops’ financing of terrorism worldwide through Morgan Stanley and possibly other criminalist US institutions, will have to be wound up, as well. This follows because now that this report has of course remained unchallenged, the US Government has come under pressure, and will remain under intensified pressure, from governments, other observers and this service, to close down these revolutionary abominations, and to make haste in doing so. The ‘discontinuity’ afforded by the arrival of a properly elected and validated (by the US Electoral College) new Administration (albeit the controlled Antithesis to the preceding Thesis), especially a man of Mr Obama’s ethnic background, provides the deliberately prearranged DIALECTICAL opportunity to achieve this desirable outcome.

We can leave our disgust and justifiable fury at the hideous behaviour of the revolutionary US Government and its ruthless Intelligence Power as a promoter and projecter of terrorism, to later.

FOLLOWING OUR MULTIPLE EXPOSURES, DVD NOW SAID TO BE ‘BITTERLY DIVIDED’
Recalling that the Intelligence Power controls the US Government, not the other way round, it can be seen that the Bush-directed neocon (Trotskyite/DVD) intelligence community’s ‘Faction A’ which has been surreptitiously promoting the World Revolution and causing mayhem around the world, is being superseded by an ‘opposing’ faction, which will now set about dismantling the worst features of the run-away revolutionary madness sponsored by Faction A.

The genies that the outgoing team’s evil people have let out of the bottle include the DELIBERATE ongoing CIA-originated radicalisation and mindless indoctrination of Pakistani youth, so that a huge swathe of that country, like Afghanistan, is in the hands of armed gangs, as is the case for the same underlying reason in large areas of Africa.

Given that the routinely treacherous British Foreign Office has a team in Rawalpindi which recruits Pakistani immigrants to the United Kingdom (each agent is said to be required to fulfil his quota of 15 Pakistani immigrants per working day, on a bonus basis), it is self-evident that elements of the British Government structures, by importing Pakistanis into Britain en masse, are actively engaged in working with the (DVD) enemy to destabilise the United Kingdom which they are supposed to be serving. This is among many such grotesque revolutionary aberrations that have come to light through recent forensic research by analysts whose brains have not yet been ‘washed’.

Such operations were originally masterminded by the Bush-linked DVD-servicing component of the corrupted US Intelligence Power, but have now all reached the ‘maximum chaos’ level and are in growing jeopardy, as we understand that, following our exposures (specifically), the Dachau-based DVD, related to Bush Sr.’s hellish activities, is now bitterly divided.

More and more of the DVD’s filthy operations are being exposed, including the transfer of little girls along with drugs and nuclear components by submarine, for unloading at a northern German port (where little girls have been photographed by clandestine operatives, being disgorged from one of the submarines in question).

DVD’S BRUSSELS BLACKMAIL UNIT AIMED AT EUROPEAN COMMISSIONERS: DG1-X
We now report a further dimension of DVD’s operations, which hopefully will accentuate additional splits in the ranks of German intelligence. The Brussels-located component of this shadowy ‘Black’ Nazi strategic deception continuum agency, labelled DG1-X, is hereby exposed. DG1-X specialises solely in compromising European Commissioners, which it divides into the following categories:

• European Commissioners susceptible to paedophile compromise for blackmail purposes; Subsidiary question: Do they prefer little boys or little girls? Refer back to our exposé of the President of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso, in the DVD exposure report published in October 2008.

• European Commissioners susceptible to the standard honey-trap operation for blackmail purposes (provision of women).

• European Commissioners susceptible to the standard bribery/financial compromise operation for blackmail purposes (money-trap operations).

As we all know, other agencies ‘do this stuff’, as you will have read elsewhere recently on this website; and not all of them are ‘Black’. But the significance of this DVD unit is that it operates in Brussels specifically to target European Commissioners, who of course are away from home when they are stuck in the distinctly gloomy Belgian capital.

• The reason for the existence of DG1-X in Brussels is that the modelling of the European Union as a COLLECTIVE, in order to obscure the underlying intention for it to be controlled by Germany and to represent, ultimately, ‘Greater Germany’, as per the blueprint originally specified in ‘Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft’ [1942, Berlin], necessitated the incorporation of an add-on mechanism for ensuring that European Commissioners could always be relied upon to do Germany’s bidding. DG1-X probably targets other EU personnel as well as Commissioners.

• FACT: When the Editor recited this information of late on the transatlantic telephone line, the connection was immediately severed. This always indicates that what is being said is accurate (routinely showing what fools the eavesdroppers are).

THE MADOFF HYDROGEN BOMB EXPLODES
The next nuclear explosion to disfigure the faces of the Workers of Darkness was the subsidiary Octopus Master Ponzi Scheme run by Bernard L. Madoff, who was arrested at about 8.30 am in his Manhattan apartment on 64th Street on 11th December 2008. In an extensive report dated the 20th December and entitled ‘Madoff Scheme Kept Rippling Outward, Crossing Borders’, The New York Times ploughed methodically through the office press cuttings file, characterising Madoff’s self-confessed giga-scam as ‘the first Global Ponzi Scheme in history’ – which is of course NOT TRUE, since George H. W. Bush Sr.’s Octopus operations represent a whole universe of exported Ponzi schemes. But the article, which covered more than two huge full pages in the newspaper, and was only concerned with the money ‘IN’ (see above), did an excellent job assembling details of Madoff’s domestic and international connections, which were almost 100% Jewish.

As we have seen, Bernard L Madoff was recruited by George W. Bush Sr. to run ‘his’ money. After the $14 trillion was placed into ‘lockdown’ during the week ending on 17th September 2008 (see above), Madoff’s firm started to encounter massive redemption demands.

Bearing in mind that the funds, once transferred abroad, for instance to London, could then be leveraged 40:1, the pressure faced by Madoff related not just to originally invested funds, but impinged upon much larger sums of money which could not be accessed because they had been routinely transferred out to offshore tax havens and to Israel and then onwards inter alia to the Southern Cone of Latin America – Paraguay, Uruguay, Argentina and Brazil – where many of the key dogs and rats are now congregating, to satisfy Bush Sr., who demanded his payoff and pound of flesh at the Jews’ expense. The Madoff takedown, in short, represented another George Bush Sr. operation to claw back the immense sums he lost at an earlier stage of the crisis for which he is responsible, inter alia via naked shorts, as reported by this service.

It can be seen, too, that the destruction of Madoff was a George Bush Sr. ‘BCCI/ENRON takedown-type’ operation designed effectively to take down Israel itself – Mr Bush Sr.’s revenge against Alan Greenspan, his former technician, with whom, as our exposures gathered momentum, he had fallen out (new information). As noted, every cited victim of the Madoff implosion is Jewish.

The United States Court proceedings deal, and are likely to continue addressing, just the money originally invested (the money ‘IN’) – not the money leveraged off the base funds, which amounts to trillions and which would appear, according to our own special sources (not secondary Internet sources) to have been channeled extensively THROUGH Israel, as has been stated, en route to South America, for the benefit of the Bushrats congregating there.

In other words, the Bushrats are not only fighting each other and their double-crossed Jewish associates inside the sack, but have essentially burned the sack (their boats) as well. The colossal transfers to Israel for onward transmission to the Southern Cone, were monitored in real time.

MADOFF RECRUITED BY, AND ‘WORKED FOR’, BUSH/CIA PONZI CRIME APPARAT
Madoff’s operations could not have been possible without, and were assisted by, insider traders associated with the Octopus operations linked to the Bush-Clinton Crime nexus. The New York Times’ article showed clearly how the scam operated, with a key mechanism being Mr Madoff’s success in hitching other, subsidiary Ponzi Scheme investment scamming operations – such as Ascot Partners (led by J Ezra Merkin), Fairfield Greenwich Group (headed by Walter M. Noel and Jeffrey Tucker, who has said that the firm worked with Madoff for 20 years), Tremont Group, and Maxam Capital Management, which enjoyed steady annual profits averaging 8%-12% and which directed a constant stream of new investors into Madoff’s clutches.

Since we now know that Madoff ‘worked for’ Bush Sr. in his later years, the leveraged proceeds from the inflowing funds that were multiplied and consistently maximised, were in the main kept abroad, while the entities and individuals listed below were paid from new incoming funds placed by new investors or by existing investors who increased their investments, with the actual Ponzi scheme related essentially to the principal monies invested, only. So gargantuan was the greed associated with this operation, that the externally generated funds were retained offshore (they could hardly be repatriated without attracting attention and without courting mandatory IRS tax evasion investigations), while the ‘IN’ money was repaid, or returns on it were paid, from new ‘IN’ money. The ‘OUT’ money was effectively an entirely separate operation.

Of course the ‘returns’ paid to investors did not reflect actual investment outturns, but rather rigged numbers falsified to enable the ‘managers’ to deliver the Ponzi-style returns expected.

In other words, there were two parallel master operations: the use of the base funds for external (40:1) leveraging, hypothecation, high-yield investment programmes and the like, with the created proceeds stashed offshore, as usual, untaxed and off-balance sheet; and the Ponzi scheme and its subsidiary Ponzi Schemes revealed in the existing Court documents, whereby earlier investors were repaid and interest was paid with funds provided by later investors. The hidden operation, concerning which Mr Madoff was reported by his elder son to be ‘cryptic’, was the Bush-related sink-hole. The Court documents imply that Madoff ‘kept several sets of books’.

We speculate that Madoff succumbed to recruitment by George Bush Sr. because he calculated that the massive hypothecated fiat money accruals generated by participating in the Bush-related off-balance sheet transnational fraudulent finance operations could be tapped so as to perpetuate his ‘on-the-books’ Ponzi Scheme activities, which he had been running long before George Bush Sr. operatives recruited him. However when Bush Sr. suddenly (we are informed) made demands consistent with a Bush ‘BCCI/ENRON takedown’ decision to ransack Madoff’s operations, to rake out all the money, to destroy his Jewish participants and inflict massive harm on the State of Israel, this means of supporting the increasingly vulnerable Ponzi Scheme ceased to be available.

Separately, we have repeatedly pointed out in these reports that all get-rich-quick ‘humanitarian’ and ‘prosperity’ programs which may have enticed participants to ignore the Prudent Man Rule with promises of mouth-watering returns, represented traps for the unwary. The original Charles Ponzi story has been posted several times with these reports, and is reposted below (3).

‘MADOFF TAKEDOWN’: A VAST SMOKESCREEN ‘PROTECTING’ THE GIGA-CROOKS
Before considering some of the Court documents associated with the Madoff ‘takedown’ operation, the matter must be placed firmly in the much broader context of the Bush-Clinton-CIA/DVD Criminal Cadres’ ruthless ransacking operations to steal as much of other people’s coveted possessions and wealth by reprobate means as possible, in order to sustain the criminalist community’s status as arbiters of both the future of humanity and of the mad World Revolution to reorder human affairs in accordance with their own sick preferences. And when we examine the clues left by the Madoff implosion operation, it becomes perfectly clear that this is an integral component of the offensive against humanity directed by the most ruthless network of gangsters to have been sicked up by the human race. The clues are quite specific, too.

According to our Palm Beach correspondent, desperate Jewish householders have been trying to sell their Christmas/holiday presents to raise cash, as their liquidity has been reduced effectively to zero. Others have been despeartely engaged in short-selling of their homes, only to find that the bankers they deal with, don’t want to know. Many people in Palm Beach, our informant says, have been literally ‘wiped out’. And the perpetrators of this ‘takedown’ have STOLEN both the money ‘IN’ and as indicated above, the much more prolific money ‘OUT’, in accordance with THE STANDARD PATTERN employed by the giga-crooks since at least the ‘classic’ CIA takedown of BCCI.

Other instances of the application of this technique, involving the hollowing-out of the target, to be followed by the deliberate, preplanned triggering of its collapse after all the ‘free money’ has been raked out, can indeed be seen to include ENRON, Iceland, even Ireland (if you look closely at the structure of that country’s balance-of-payments), and now the Madoff enterprises.

Looking at ‘Madoff’ in this broader perspective, we can see with ease that Bernard L. Madoff is just the shill: there is always a shill. He ‘had it good’ for years: now it’s his turn to take the full rap. If he winds up in jail for the rest of his life, what is that to the big criminals behind the curtain? If several people get killed, as happened with the takedown of Enron, what is that to the giga-crooks? If the people of Iceland starve and shiver in the cold, who cares, given that the country’s entire financial system has long since been ransacked and hollowed out?

In addition, the Madoff Ponzi system ‘implosion’, which was directly linked to the consequences of the London ‘Safety Lock Box’ raids on 2nd June 2008 and the placement of the $14.0 trillion into what we have described as ‘lockdown’ on 12th September 2008, as sources of replacement funds effectively dried up from mid-September onwards (the London-based stolen and illicit collateral having been neutralised), serves the following purposes in the interests of the giga-crooks:

• A diversionary purpose: Everyone is looking directly at the Madoff case, becoming entangled and confused by the spaghetti junction of confusing sub-cases, litigation, Court documents, SEC, FINRA and SIPC investigations: which is JUST WHAT THE GIGA-U.S. CROOKS WANT. After all, they have got away with the BIG MONEY, they have hollowed out the Master Ponzi Scheme and all its subsidiary Ponzi operations, and they urgently need the benefit of the cover so helpfully now provided by the MADOFF SMOKESCREEN, for two reasons:

(1) To ensure that no-one looks BEYOND the Court documents to grasp what has happened.

(2) To ensure that no-one looks into the criminal finance operations these people have been up to inside Citibank. In this connection, we interrupt this sequence with a reference to some comments attributed to Sir Win Bischoff, the Chairman of Citigroup, during a New Year’s Day broadcast on the BBC’s domestic Radio 4 Today Programme.

Asked the usual knee-jerk BBC question: ‘Who is really to blame for the crisis?’ (this question is asked repeatedly because none of these journalists can get it into their heads that this is 100% about ORGANISED FINANCIAL FRAUD AND NOTHING ELSE), Sir Win responded as follows:

‘My view is that they [bankers] are partly to blame. There are people who feel remorse about this: there’s no doubt about it. Do they all? I don’t know…. It is very important for banks not to deny that they carry some of the can, whether that’s 50 cents on the dollar, that is their responsibility, or 60 or 40’. Now remember that Sir Win is CHAIRMAN OF THIS HUGE BANK. WHAT DOES THIS IMPLY?

• A possible insider control purpose: When we examine the Court papers (the earliest filed Court documents were assembled from the US Court by the Editor), we discover that CONTROL OF THE EXPOSURES MAY BE CONTAINED ‘within the system’. There are several clues to this possibility:

(A) Court Document #2 [Securities and Exchange Commission COMPLAINT vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791 (LLS): Appointment of Receiver, Lee Richards, of Richards Kibbe & Orbe LLP ‘over all the assets and accounts of defendant Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“BMIS”) outside of the United States, to take control forthwith over BMIS’s dealings and transactions with any non-United States entity or counterparty, with full access to BMIS’s books and records necessary or useful to him in the exercise of his powers over BMIS’s foreign business or transactions’ signed by United States District Judge Louis L. Stanton at 6.42pm on 12th December 2008: plus:

Court Document #3: Securities and Exchange Commission ORDER vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791 (LLS) ECF Case: Order to show cause, Temporary Restraining Order and Order Freezing Assets and Granting Other Relief; Order consented to by defendants and therefore signed off by United States District Judge Louis L. Stanton at 4:51pm on 13th December 2008.

Court Document #2 appoints LEE RICHARDS, of Richards Knibbe & Orbe LLP, as ‘receiver over all the assets and accounts of the defendant Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“BMIS”) outside of the United States’, while Court Document #3 appoints LEE RICHARDS, of Richards Knibbe & Orbe LLP ‘as receiver for the Defendants’ assets, including, without limitation, Madoff Securities International Ltd. (“Madoff International”) and Madoff Ltd.’: the Defendants being Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Securities LLC.

LEE S. RICHARDS III is a founding partner of Richards Knibbe & Orbe LLP. His stated specialities, according to the firm’s website, are ‘white collar criminal defense, securities enforcement defense, regulatory proceedings, internal investigations and complex litigations’.

‘He has extensive trial experience and he regularly represents investment banks, hedge funds, public companies, investment advisers, corporate officers and directors, and other professionals in investigations and proceedings by the DOJ, SEC, FINRA, and other governmental entities and SROs. He also represents companies and senior executives in commercial litigations, class action and derivative cases, and arbitrations relating to a variety of disputes’.

Under the lead-in ‘Some notable representations include’, Mr Richards’ website lists the following:

‘Representation of several major New York investment banks in a variety of DOJ, SEC and FINRA investigations…

… including the representation of one of the major investment banks which advised ENRON’.

From this information it can be stated without fear of contradiction that Mr Lee Richards III is very knowledgeable in respect of how Enron- and Madoff-type Ponzi operations are structured.

(b) Under the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (SIPA, 15 U.S.C. Sec 78aaa et seq.), the SEC and also the Securities Investor Protection Corporation requested (Civ. 08-10791) the US Court on 15th December 2008 to name Irving H. Picard [SEE BELOW] as Trustee, with the firm of Baker and Hostetler LLP appointed Counsel for the Trustee. This development will be referenced in greater detail when we examine the Court documents below, where we point out that:

Baker and Hostetler LLP has been established for 90 years with offices in Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Cosa Mesa, Denver, HOUSTON, Los Angeles, New York, Orlando, Washington DC, Brazil and Mexico. Having been ordered to be appointed Trustee under SIPA via the SEC and Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Irving J. Picard proceeded to JOIN the New York office of Baker & Hostetler LLP, per the firm’s Press Release, dated 22nd December 2008, headed: ‘Court-Appointed Trustee In Madoff Fraud Investigation Joins Baker Hostetler in New York’.

• WE REPEAT: Irving J. Picard was appointed Trustee, BAKER and Hostetler LLP were appointed Counsel to the Trustee: whereupon Irving J. Picard joins the firm of Counsel. IMAGINE!

On 3rd January 2009, The Times, London, reported that Martin Rosenman, President of Stuyvesant Fuel Service, a private New York-based fuel company, is suing Irving J. Picard, for the return of $10 million. The context of this suit revolves around that fact that Mr Picard’s first action was to obtain the Bankruptcy Court’s authority to transfer $28.1 million from the $200-$300 million said to be left in Madoff’s bank account(s), to cover the costs of the liquidation. But Mr Rosenman argued on 2nd January that Mr Picard had no right to these funds, pointing out that he (Mr Rosenman) transferred $10 million to Madoff just six days ahead of Mr Madoff’s arrest.

Specifically, Mr Rosenman argued that he spoke to Bernard L. Madoff on 3rd December 2008 about investing, and on 5th December he received details of an account into which the cash should be transferred. On 9th December, Martin Rosenman was informed by BMIS that Bernard L. Madoff had sold short $10 million in US Treasury bills on his behalf. Claiming that he had not authorised such a transfer, Mr Rosenman stated that he could find no record of any such transaction.

The lawsuit claims: ‘BMIS never transacted a trade of US Treasury bills on Rosenman’s behalf’. Mr Howard Kleinhendler, a partner in the firm of Wachtel & Masyr, representing Mr Rosenman, said that he suspected that at the time that Mr Rosenman invested his funds, Madoff knew that he was close to being exposed and caught, and was collecting cash in order to make a final distribution among family and friends. in addition to revealing Mr Picard’s action, this is just an example of the incredible legal tangle that is now building.

• 6th January 2009 Update: Irving J. Picard was reported by Bloomberg on 5th January to have identified $830 million in liquid assets in bank accounts associated with BMIS. Stephen Harbeck told the Congressional Committee that these assets ‘may be’ subject to recovery for clients of Madoff’s firm, according to Bloomberg, without explaining the use here of imprecise language.

In a separate Bloomberg report, the Assistant US Attorney, Marc Litt, whose signature appears on the Court documents obtained by the Editor of this service, was stated to have asked the Federal Judge to imprison Mr Madoff, as he awaits trial, arguing that Mr Madoff’s $10 million bail (and, one would presume, his properties pledged to the US Government) should now be revoked and the funds forfeited because he transferred $1.0 million of valuables, in violation of the asset freeze order. The report stated that Madoff disposed of five items, including ‘very valuable jewelry’, Mr Litt informed the Magistrate Judge, Ronald Ellis, on 5th January in the Manhattan Federal Court.

Some of the items were mailed by Madoff and his wife Ruth to third parties. Mr Litt stated that the transfer started on 29th December 2008, representing a ‘changed circumstance’, specified under Federal law, precipitating the necessity to alter the terms of Mr Madoff’s bail, since the transfer violated the freezing of his assets agreed to as confirmed in the Court papers we have examined.

Marc Litt explained that ‘the case against the defendant is strong, and it’s getting stronger’. The transfer represented ‘an obstruction of justice’.

(3) An examination by the Editor of the time-sequence of events which led to Bernard L. Madoff’s arrest reveals an extremely tight timeframe within which the ‘Madoff takedown operation’ was accomplished, suggesting at the very least that Attorneys, typists and other personnel would have to have worked all night on the necessary documentation.

Now knowledgeable US sources inform the Editor that this is not unusual. Nevertheless, the whole process looks TOO PAT TO HAVE BEEN SPONTANEOUS. Consider the following sequence, extracted from the Securities Fraud Count document submitted to the Court on 11th December by the FBI Special Agent, Thodore Cacioppi:

• First week of December 2008: Bernard L. Madoff informed ‘Senior Employee No. 2’ (one of his sons) that there had been requests from clients for approximately $7 billion in redemptions.

• About 9th December 2007: Madoff informed ‘Senior Employee No.1’ (one of his sons) that he wanted to pay bonuses to employees in December, rather than February (as was usual).

• On 10th December 2008, the ‘Senior Employees’ ‘visited Madoff at the offices of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC to discuss the situation further… At that time, Madoff informed the Senior Employees that he had recently made profits through business operations, and that now was a good time to distribute…’.

‘When the Senior Employees challenged his explanation, Mr Madoff said that he did not want to talk to them at the office, and arranged a meeting at Mr Madoff’s apartment in Manhattan. According to Senior Employee No. 2, Madoff stated in substance, that ‘”he wasn’t sure he would be able to hold it together” if they continued to discuss the matter at the office’.

• ‘Confession’ of Madoff to his two sons on 10th December: ‘His investment advisory business was a fraud… he was “finished”… it was “basically a giant Ponzi scheme”… the business was insolvent, and [that] it had been for years… the losses from this fraud [were] at least $50 billion’

• On 11th December, the FBI Special Agent with another FBI agent entered Madoff’s Manhattan apartment after presenting themselves, and at Madoff’s invitation. ‘He acknowledged knowing why we were there. After I [the FBI Special Agent] stated “we’re here to find out if there’s an innocent explanation”, Madoff stated, “There is no innocent explanation”‘.

The FBI Special Agent’s Charge document was dated the same day, 11th December 2008, and was signed off by The Hon. Douglas F. Eaton, United States Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of New York. Now the Editor is prepared to acknowledge that the US ‘system’ is capable of great efficiency: but given the complexity of the documents that the Editor was able to obtain direct from the Court during his pre-Christmas visit to New York, and even conceding that the documents may in some instances have been elaborated from boiler-plate templates, the whole process seems to the Editor of this service to have been MUCH TOO PAT AND COMPACT TO BE REASSURING.

That, in turn, supports the analysis that the ‘Madoff takedown’ falls into the BCCI, Enron, Iceland imposion category, the model procedure being that when the time comes for all the accessible cash to be raked out, the carcase of the target is DELIBERATELY COLLAPSED, to facilitate this.

• Depending on the circumstances, this may have to be done in a frightful hurry.

In this connection, we can also observe that Madoff told his sons that he had just $200-$300 million of cash left. THE REST OF THE FUNDS HAD BEEN MISAPPROPRIATED AND STOLEN. Hence he left the ‘collapsing operation’ until the remaining several hundred million was ‘available’ for the illegal distribution that he was contemplating: a step too far for his sons, who, if they had agreed to such a distribution, would have laid themselves open to immediate arrest, along with their father. Whether they will be arrested later, remains to be seen, and depends on how much they knew.

Finally, the relevance of the foregoing open information concerning the SEC-appointed Trustee and the SIPC-appointed Trustee who immediately joins the firm of Counsel, should be reviewed.

MADOFF ‘CHANGES THE SUBJECT’, WHILE LAW ENFORCEMENT SITS ON ITS HANDS
In summary, Madoff ‘changes the subject’: No-one is supposed to be looking inside Citibank, no-one is supposed to be going on about the Settlements, no-one is supposed to be talking about the stolen/diverted $14.0 trillion of LOAN MONEY THAT BELONGS TO THE QUEEN, TO PRINCE AL-AWEED AND THE CHINESE PARTIES, no-one is supposed to care a hoot about the plight of the 320,000 long-suffering pillaged ‘package’ victims, and no-one is supposed to be in charge of his or her brains any longer, because ‘IT ALL DEPENDS ON THE OUTCOME OF MADOFF’.

• A lovely, open-ended laywer-enriching spaghetti junction of intertwined litigation operating at cross-purposes with no conceivable resolution because the innumerable decisions will all come to rely on each other, or will be impeded by the innumerable ongoing investigations which will take years to resolve, if any can ever be resolved. The perfect contrived cover for the giga-crooks.

MEANWHILE:

• THE GIGA-CRIMINALS HAVE STOLEN THE BIG MONEY. BUSH SR. HAS PROBABLY BY NOW GOT HIS TRILLIONS ‘BACK’, even though they were of course STOLEN IN THE FIRST PLACE.

• You are perfectly entitled to ask yet again, but with much greater determination than ever:

EXACTLY WHAT HAS U.S. LAW ENFORCEMENT BEEN DOING ALL THIS TIME, WHILE WE AND OTHERS, AT GREAT RISK TO OUR OWN PERSONAL SAFETY, HAVE BEEN EXPOSING THIS BOTTOMLESS AND REEKING CESSPIT OF OPEN-ENDED U.S.-PRIMED FINANCIAL CRIMINALITY?

• Law enforcement, Gold Badges and others need to get off their butts, instead of feathering their own nests like the rest of these people, and MI6/Interpol need to redouble their own operations in order to ensure that the requirements of the owners of the LOAN funds are fulfilled. Further failure to deliver, will CERTAINLY condemn the world to an absolutely horrendous future: IN 2009.

• Our forecasts have been accurate to date: SO START PAYING PROPER ATTENTION and earn some respect, instead of displaying your individual and collective feebleness and impotence.

• It is INSUFFERABLE for you people to be allowing these criminal operatives to get away with their crimes, if this is what is happening, and to obfuscate the audit trails with the connivance of deeply-placed Accessories to the Fact of this massive operation to hijack the whole world.

• Nor can it be tolerated that the criminalist cadres may indeed be relying upon the potential for the Madoff events to OBFUSCATE matters to their advantage, and to impede the Settlements and the grossly overdue implementation of the G-7-Approved on-the-books Capital Markets revenue-producing and tax-generating SOLUTION TO THE WHOLE WORLD’S FINANCIAL PROBLEMS which the US-based Washington area operatives have deliberately and malevolently SABOTAGED.

• So get off your butts and belatedly start DOING YOUR JOB.

• Or, as we asked earlier, are you ALL co-conspirators? THAT’S THE IMPRESSION YOU GIVE.

• WE ALL WANT RESULTS, NOT LIES, BLUFFS, DIVERSIONS AND SUBTERFUGES.

THE PRIMARY ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS FROM THE MADOFF COURT FILES
Addressing exclusively the money ‘IN’ dimension, the Editor has obtained the complete file (Case Numbers: 08 MAG 2735, AND 08 Civ. 10791), as of 21st December, held at the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on the Madoff case (4), which represents the biggest explosion since our exposure of the Morgan Stanley Terrorism Financing Center, from which we report as follows, bearing in mind the context outlined above:

• Madoff’s ‘agreed bail package’ specified on the Appearance Bond dated 11th December 2008 bound Madoff to pay the United States $10.0 million (personal recognizance bond) secured by the Defendant’s Manhattan Apartment (valued at approximately $7.0 million) and to be co-signed by four financially responsible persons including his wife; and limited his travel to the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York and Connecticut, requiring him to surrender his travel documents. The Appearance Bond was signed by Bernard L. Madoff and by his wife, Ruth Madoff, and Peter Madoff, as surety.

• On 17th December 2008 a Court Agreement to Forfeit Property was signed by Bernard Madoff and Ruth Madoff. The property forfeited pending the outcome of the case consists of the Manhattan apartment on 64th Street,, Madoff’s Palm Beach residence, and his third US residence in Montauk, on the northeast fork of Long Island.

• The Complaint filed on 11th December 2008 by FBI Special Agent Theodore Cacioppi, in which Bernard L. Madoff is accused of violation of 15 U.S.C. sections 78j(b), 78ff; 17 C.F.R. section 240, 10b-5, contains inter alia the following:

COUNT ONE [Securities fraud]
1. … Bernard L. MADOFF, the defendant, unlawfully, willfully and knowingly, by the use of the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce and of the mails, directly and indirectly, in connection with the purchase and sale of securities, would and did use and employ [sundry] manipulative and deceptive devices and contrivances in violation of Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 240.10b-5, by:

(a) employing devices, schemes, and artifices to defraud;

(b) making [many] untrue statements of material facts and omitting to state material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, and:

(c) engaging in acts, practices, and courses of business which operated and would operate as a fraud and deceit upon persons, to wit, MADOFF deceived investors by operating a securities business in which he traded and lost investor money, and then paid certain investors purported returns on investment with the principal received from other, different investors, which resulted in losses of approximately billions of dollars. (…)

3. I have reviewed the publicly available website of a securities broker dealer named Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, from which I have learned the following:

(a) BERNARD L. MADOFF, defendant, is founder of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC;

(b) Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC is a securities broker dealer with its principal office in New York, New York;

(c) Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC “is a leading international market maker. The firm has been providing quality executions for broker-dealers, banks and financial institutions since its inception in 1960”;

(d) “[w]ith more than $700 million in firm capital, Madoff currently ranks among the top 1% of US Securities firms;

(e) BERNARD L. MADOFF, the defendant, is a former Chairman of the Board of Directors of the NASDAQ stock market; and:

(f) “Clients know that Bernard Madoff has a personal interest in maintaining an unblemished record of value, fair-dealing, and high ethical standards that has always been the firm’s hallmark”.

4. I have interviewed two senior employees of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“Senior Employee No. 1”, and “Senior Employee No. 2”, collectively the “Senior Employees”).

The Senior Employees informed me, in substance, of the following:

(a). The Senior Employees are employed by Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, in a proprietary trading and market making capacity. According to the Senior Employees, BERNARD L. MADOFF, the defendant, conducts certain investment advisory business for clients that is separate from the firm’s proprietary trading and market making activities.

According to the Senior Employees, MADOFF ran his investment adviser business from a separate floor in the New York offices of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. According to Senior Employee No. 1, MADOFF kept the financial statements for the firm under lock and key, and stated that MADOFF was “cryptic” about the firm’s investment advisory business.

(b). In or about the first week of December 2008, BERNARD L. MADOFF, the defendant, told Senior Employee No. 2 that there had been requests from [various] clients for approximately $7.0 billion in redemptions, that he was struggling to obtain the liquidity necessary to meet these obligations, but that he thought that he would be able to do so.

According to the Senior Employees, they had previously understood that the investment advisory business had assets under management on the order of between approximately $8 and $15 billion. According to a Form ADV filled by MADOFF on behalf of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC with the SEC on or about January 7, 2008, MADOFF’s investment advisory business served between 11 and 25 clients and had a total of about $17.1 billion in assets under management.

(c). On or about December 9, 2008, MADOFF informed Senior Employee No. 1 that he wanted to pay bonuses to employees of the firm in December, which was earlier than the employee bonuses are usually paid. According to the Senior Employees, bonuses traditionally have been paid in February of each year. On or about December 10, 2008, the Senior Employees visited MADOFF at the offices of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC so as to discuss the situation further, particularly because MADOFF had appeared to the Senior Employees to have been under great stress in the prior weeks. At that time, Mr MADOFF informed the Senior Employees that he had recently made profits through business operations, and that now was a good time to distribute them. When the Senior Employees challenged his explanation, MADOFF said he did not want to talk to them at the office, and arranged a meeting at MADOFF’s apartment in Manhattan.

According to Senior Employee No. 2, MADOFF stated, in substance, that he “wasn’t sure he would be able to hold it together” if they continued to discuss the issue at the office.

(d). At MADOFF’s Manhattan apartment, MADOFF informed the Senior Employees, in substance, that his investment advisory business was a fraud. MADOFF stated that he was “finished”, that he [now] had “absolutely nothing”, that “it’s all just one big lie”, and that it was “basically a Ponzi scheme”. The Senior Employees understood MADOFF to be saying, in substance, that he had for years been paying returns to certain investors out of the principal received from other, different investors. MADOFF stated that the business was insolvent, and that it had been for years. Mr MADOFF also stated that he estimated the losses from this fraud to be at least approximately $50 billion. One of the Senior Employees has a personal account at Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC in which several million had been invested under the management of MADOFF.

(e). At MADOFF’s Manhattan apartment, MADOFF further informed the Senior Employees that, in approximately one week, he planned to surrender to authorities, but before he did that, he had approximately $200-$300 million left, and he planned to use that money to make payments to certain selected employees, family, and friends. (…)

5. On December 11, 2008, I spoke to BERNARD L. MADOFF, the defendant. After identifying myself, MADOFF invited me, and the FBI agent who accompanied me, into his apartment. He acknowledged knowing why we were there.

After I stated, “we’re here to find out if there’s an innocent explanation”, MADOFF stated, “There is no innocent explanation”. MADOFF stated, in substance, that he had personally traded and had lost money for institutional clients, and that it was all his fault. MADOFF further stated, in substance, that he “paid investors with money that wasn’t there”.

MADOFF stated that he was “broke” and “insolvent” and that he had decided that “it could not go on”, and that he expected to go to jail. MADOFF also stated that he had recently admitted what he had done to Senior Employees Nos. 1, 2 and 3.

WHEREFORE, deponent prays that BERNARD L. MADOFF, the defendant, be imprisoned, or bailed, as the case may be.

THEODORE CACIOPPI
Special Agent
Federal Bureau of Investigation

Sworn to before me this 11th day of December, 2008

[Signed] Honorable Douglas F. Eaton, United States Magistrate Judge,
Southern District of New York.

THE COMPLAINT BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Complaint, filed with the Court on 11th December 2008 (08 Civ. 10791) informed the Court in summary that:

1. The Commission brings this emergency action to halt ongoing fraudulent offerings of securities and investment advisory fraud by Bernard L. Madoff (“Madoff”) and Bernard L. Madoff Investment securities LLC (“BMIS”), a broker dealer and investment adviser registered with the Commission. From an indeterminate period through the present, Madoff and BMIS has committed fraud through the investment adviser activities of BMIS. Yesterday, Madoff admitted to one or more employees of BMIS that for many years he has been conducting a Ponzi-scheme through the investment adviser activities of BMIS and that BMIS has liabilities of approximately $50 billion.

Mr Madoff told these employees that he intends to distribute any remaining funds at BMIS to the employees and certain investors in the investment advisor business, such as family and friends. Such a distribution will be unfair and inequitable to other investors and creditors of BMIS.

2. Expedited relief is needed to halt the fraud and prevent the Defendants from unfairly distributing the remaining assets in an unfair and inequitable manner to employees, friends and relatives, at the expense of other customers.

3. To halt the ongoing fraud, maintain the status quo and preserve any assets for injured investors, the Commission seeks emergency relief, including temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions, and an order:

(i) imposing asset freezes against the Defendants;

(ii) appointing a receiver over BMIS;

(iii) allowing expedited discovery and preventing the destruction of documents; and:

(iv) requiring the Defendants to provide verified accountings.

The Commission also seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, plus prejudgment interest and civil monetary penalties against all of the Defendants.

On 12th December 2008, the SEC asked the Court to issue ‘a temporary restraining Order and an Order freezing assets and granting other relief’ (08 Civ. 10791 (LLS) ECF Case: to which, in a Note, the SEC stated that the Defendants had consented) directing that:

‘pending a final disposition of this action, Defendants, and each of their financial and brokerage institutions, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and those persons in active concert or in participation with either of them who receive actual notice of such Order by means of personal service, facsimile service, telephonic notice, notice by e-mail, or otherwise, and each of them, hold and retain within their control, and otherwise prevent, any withdrawal, transfer, pledge, [offsetting or] encumbrance, assignment, dissipation, concealment or other disposal of any assets, funds, or other property (including money, real or personal property, securities, commodities, choses [sic] in action or other property of any kind whatsoever) of, held by, or under the direct or indirect control of, Defendants, whether held in the name of Madoff, BMIS, Madoff International or Madoff Ltd.., or for the direct or indirect beneficial interest of one or both of them, wherever situated, in whatever form such assets may presently exist and wherever located, and directing each of the financial or brokerage institutions, debtors and bailees, or any other person or entity holding such assets, funds or other property of the Defendants, to hold or retain within its control and prohibit the withdrawal, removal, transfer or other disposal of any such assets, funds or other properties, including, but not limited to:

(1) all assets, funds, or other properties held in the name of, held by, or under the control of one or both of the Defendants;

(2) all accounts in the name of Madoff or BMIS or on which Madoff is a signatory, including the accounts listed [herewith: the accounts were listed as Appendix A but are given here now]:

• JP Morgan Chase Account No: 000000140081703
Account in the Name of: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities

• JP Morgan Chase Account No: 000000066709466
Account in the Name of: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities

• The Bank of New York Mellon Account No: 890-0402-393
Account in the Name of: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities

• The Bank of New York Mellon Account No: 030-0951050
Account in the Name of: Bernard L. Madoff

• The Bank of New York Mellon Account No: 866-1126-621
Account in the Name of: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC

• NOTE: On 30th December, it emerged that Irving J. Picard, the SIPC-appointed Trustee, had reached ‘an understanding’ with Bank of New York Mellon to have certain funds released.

MORE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON BANK ACCOUNTS COME TO LIGHT
But the US Bankruptcy Judge, Burton Lifland, indicated that the Court papers outlining the said ‘agreement’ were ‘very basic’, according to Bloomberg, and asked Picard’s lawyer, Richard Bernard, for more information on the accounts in question. Bernard told the Court that there are ‘more funds and accounts’, without being specific.

He added that Bank of New York Mellon was holding some funds back because it may have “set-off rights” on certain claims, adding that he was limited in what he could say in open Court because of the ongoing criminal investigations. Clause III of the Order requested of the Court by the SEC and SIPC against BMIS filed on 15th December 2008 and signed by US District Judge Louis L. Stanton at 4:08pm on that date, reads:

‘ORDERED that all persons and entities are notified that, subject to the other provisions of 11 U.S.C. section 362, the automatic stay provisions of 11 U.S.C. section 362(a) operate as a stay of:

… G. The set-off of any debt owing to the Defendant that arose before the commencement of this proceeding against any claim against the Defendant’.

Clause VIII elaborates: ‘ORDERED that the stays set forth above shall not apply to:

G. Any set-off or liquidating transaction undertaken pursuant to the rules or bylaws of any securities clearing agency registered under section 17A(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. section 78q-1(b), or by any person acting under instructions from and on behalf of such a securities clearing agency…’.

To illustrate again that the SEC has finally been galvanised in this case to be seen to be casting its net over EVERY PARTY involved with Mr Madoff, Paragraph III of the SEC’s Order to Show Cause, Temporary Restraining Order, and Order Freezing Assets and Granting Other Relief [dated 12th December 2008] stated [page 8 of the Court document]:

‘IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants show cause… why this Court should not also enter an Order enjoining them, and any person or entity acting at their direction or on their behalf, from destroying, altering, concealing or otherwise interfering with, the access of the [SEC] Plaintiff Commission to any and all documents, books and records, that are in the possession, custody or control of Defendants, and each of their partners, agents, employees, servants, accountants, financial or brokerage institutions, attorneys-in-fact, subsidiaries, affiliates, predecessors and successors and related entities that refer, reflect or relate to the allegations in the Complaint, including, without limitation, documents, books, and records referring, reflecting or relating to defendants’ finances or business operations, or the offer or sale of securities by Defendants and the use of proceeds therefrom’. ENDS.

The relevant Court-filed documents clearly and specifically identify all the possible categories of collaborators and participants, and all Madoff-related property wherever located, prohibiting the tampering with and destruction of documents and of course TEAR SHEETS, or any movement of funds, requiring the unravelling of all funds commingled between BMIS and Madoff’s personal account(s), so that anyone caught up in this maelstrom who disturbs the audit trail will fall within the Court’s sights for appropriate treatment.

Specifically, the Defendants were directed to ‘provide a verified accounting immediately’, against the background of the freezing of the assets of the Defendants, the appointment of Lee Richards, of Richards Kibbe & Orbe LLP as ‘Receiver for the Defendants’ assets including without limitation Madoff Securities International Ltd (“Madoff International”)’, the London platform from where the primary leveraging operations were run, ‘and Madoff Ltd’.

The SEC’s Order requesting the freezing of relevant accounts and other relief sought, as noted, prohibition of ‘the destruction, concealment, or alteration of documents by Defendants’. ‘It appears from the evidence presented that certain ill-gotten gains derived from the Defendants’ fraudulent conduct have been deposited into the accounts of BMIS and/or Mr Madoff’s personal accounts. Self-evidently, Madoff-linked accounts in London and on the Continent are clearly targeted by the language of the Court documents, but it remains to be seen whether this will result in transparency of whether, as may be expected, an opaque veil will be drawn over the international dimensions.

On 31st December 2008, it was reported that Pomerantz, a prominent law firm, was considering asking the US District Court for the Southern District of New York to publish the list that Madoff had been required to compile, detailing the precise whereabouts of the assets. This firm was reported to be seeking to sue hedge fund Ponzi operations that channelled money into the Madoff ‘money machine’. Bernard L. Madoff had been required by the US Court to draw up a detailed list of all his investments, assets, loans, lines of credit and accounts (should there be any beyond those already identified by the SEC in its documentation), and to furnish this information by close of business on New Year’s Eve (see below).

Bloomberg reported on 1st January 2009 that an SEC enforcement official, Andrew Calamari, had confirmed receipt of the list of assets required to have been delivered by Mr Madoff and BMIS by close of business on 31st December 2008, adding that the list will not be made public. The official said that the Court had not authorised the disclosure of the ‘domestic’ list: ‘The 18th December Court Order does not authorize public release of materials related to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s ongoing investigation’.

• Commenting on this point, Professor John Coffee of Columbia Law School told Bloomberg that the SEC may intend the data to be kept secret because ‘there is a danger that foreign regulators and foreign creditors may seek to seize that money if the names are made public’.

• This was the first hint that, in addition to the US domestic legal ‘spaghetti junction’ of conflicting litigation, the international dimension will magnify this legal quagmire by an order of magnitude.

Under the relevant Court order signed by Louis L. Stanton, US District Judge, the list had to include all assets held by Madoff’s operations for his “direct or indirect benefit”.

Madoff’s foreign operations, such as the London-based Ponzi scamming machine offices located off Berkeley Square, Mayfair, central London, were given until 26th January to compile and hand over their own lists. Exclusion of any information from such lists will incur severe consequences.

By the end of 2008, four related cases by aggrieved investors had already been filed since the Madoff ‘confession’, arrest and bail arrangements were publicised. The SEC is expected to take steps to repatriate assets held outside the United States. All cases lodged into this maelstrom will become entangled in the already complex demands of the SEC/SIPC/FINRA investigations.

On 3rd January 2009, Fred Longer, a lawyer representing Group Defined Pension Plan & Trust, a Jersey City, NJ-based investor, filed a lawsuit in the Manhattan Federal Court against the hedge fund operator Tremont Group Holdings [see list below] over Madoff-related losses. Also named was Tremont’s auditor, Ernst & Young LLP, with Longer claiming that the accounting firm missed warnings about the Ponzi scheme. This Complaint seeks class-action, or group, status.

It appears that losses disclosed by some clients, and in the public demain [see our list below] may have been inflated by purported gains shown in the clients’ accounts with Madoff. Thus, whereas Yeshiva University, New York, had valued its foldings with Madoff at $110 million, it stated on 30th December that its net investment was of the order of $14.5 million, before inflation by ‘fictitious profits’. So there may be large differences between ‘money ‘IN”, and totals ‘lost’.

EXPERT ADVANCE WARNINGS ‘DISREGARDED BY THE S.E.C.’
To add to the discomfort of the SEC and the entire Bush-corrupted Wall Street Establishment, it emerged before Christmas that Harry Markopolos, a derivatives expert who previously worked for Rampart Investment Management, a fund competing with the Madoff operations, had been warning the SEC for TEN YEARS prior to the Madoff exposures, that Bernard L. Madoff’s activities ‘stank to high heaven’. He spent ten years trying to induce the Securities and Exchange Commission to investigate Mr Madoff and all his works.

For instance, Markopolos had accused Madoff of using the names of UBS and Merrill Lynch to lend credibility to his Ponzi activities. This is a variant of our point that holders of ‘derived’ assets enjoy NO RECOURSE TO SOURCE OF FUNDS, with their ‘assets’ supported solely by the name(s) of the institution(s) marketing them (their values being, as a savvy Jewish friend of the Editor’s pointed out recently, ‘what somebody agrees to pay for them’).

The London Times reported on 19th December that:

‘According to the [Markopolos] documents, which were written in November 2005, Mr Madoff is alleged to have told potential investors that all his options trading business was channelled through UBS and Merrill Lynch’.

‘However, Mr Markopolos asserted: “The counterparty credit exposures for UBS and Merrill would be too large for these firms’ credit departments to approve. The SEC should ask Bernard Madoff for trade tickets showing he has traded OTC [over the counter] options thru these two firms”‘.

‘It is understood that neither UBS nor Merrill Lynch has any material exposure to Mr Madoff’s businesses and also that neither had had a sufficiently substantial relationship with Mr Madoff to have conducted these types of trades. Such a discrepancy raises serious questions about the truthfulness of Mr Madoff’s sales pitch to new investors, such as hedge funds, and whether Mr Madoff sought to exploit the longstanding reputations of UBS and Merrill Lynch [sic] to legitimise his own operations’.

On 22nd December, The Times, London, elaborated:

‘Harry Markopolos, a derivatives expert who once worked for a rival fund, spent ten years urging the SEC to investigate Mr Madoff. In numerous reports, including a 19-page document written in November 2005 entitled ‘The World’s Largest Hedge Fund is a Fraud’, Mr Markopolos picked apart the investment strategy of Mr Madoff’.

‘Some claims by Mr Markopolos were anecdotal – “I have spoken to the heads of various Wall Street equity derivative trading desks and every single one of the senior managers I spoke with told me that Bernie Madoff was a fraud” – but sizeable chunks of his accusations involve detailed analysis of Mr Madoff’s investment strategy. He questions the way that Bernard Madoff charged for commissions and alleges that Mr Madoff used the names of leading investment banks such as UBS and Merrill Lynch to lend credibility to his schemes’.

‘He also claims that the overall investment strategy of Mr Madoff would have been impossible to carry out. Mr Madoff sought to lure investors with the promise of 12% returns by buying blue-chip stocks and insuring against the possibility that their value would fall by selling derivatives – a process known as hedging. Mr Markopolos argues, however, that for Mr Madoff to have fulfilled such a strategy, he would have regularly done more business than the entire New York market in those securities’.

HEAVILY PROMOTED STAR WITNESS FAILS TO APPEAR: WAS HE THREATENED?
Unsurprisingly, Harry Markopolos was to be a star witness to be questioned on 5th January 2009 by the Financial Services Committee of the House of Representatives, where the Democrat Chairman of the panel, Barney Frank, was faced with having to steer a careful course between seeking to extract the truth from terrified SEC officials, and the known involvement of severely compromised members of the Legislative Branch of the United States Government.

• UPDATE: Bloomberg reported on 5th January that Harry Markopolos, the former Chief Investment Officer with Tampart Investment Management, Boston, cancelled his appearance before Congress, saying that he was ‘worn down’ and wanted more time to prepare his remarks, accoding to Barney Frank, Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. This development has to be added to the roster of UNSATISFACTORY DEVELOPMENTS related elsewhere in this report. The impression gained is that Mr Markopolos may have been THREATENED and ordered to amend his testimony, ‘or else’. If such tactics are being used, it shows that the rats have STILL not realised that WHETHER THEY LIKE IT OR NOT, EVERYTHING WILL BE EXPOSED.

CALENDAR OF OFFICIAL REGULATORY AND ENFORCEMENT FAILURES
The Christian Science Monitor obliged on 5th January with a handy summary of the ongoing ‘lapses’ of supervision and enforcement by the corrupted Securities and Exchange Commission, to wit:

• 1992: Madoff’s name comes up in an SEC probe of Florida accountants who
allegedly sold unregistered securities.

• 1999: SEC examiners review trading practices at Madoff’s investment advisory firm.

• 2001: The SEC’s Boston office receives information from securities industry executive Harry Markopolos raising questions about the steady stock market returns of Madoff’s firm.

• 2004: The SEC looks into whether Madoff’s firm engaged in improper trading practices.

• 2005: The SEC interviews Madoff and family members, finding no improper trading practices.

• 2005: An industry-based regulatory office finds no improper trading practices by Madoff’s firm.

• 2005: SEC investigators meet with Markopolos, who alleges that Madoff’s firm is “the world’s largest Ponzi scheme”: see details above.

• 2006: An SEC enforcement investigation finds that Madoff and one of his clients misled regulators. As a result, Madoff agrees to register as an investment adviser.

• 2007: The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) examines Madoff’s firm. No regulatory action results. It appears that this entity took its cue from the corrupted SEC [yet see above].

PARALLEL INTERVENTION OF THE SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION
United States District Judge Louis L. Stanton signed the Defendants’ consent to the total Order (only partially reported here) at 4.51pm on 12th December 2008. Additionally, under the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (SIPA, 15 U.S.C. Sec 78aaa et seq.), the SEC and also the Securities Investor Protection Corporation requested (Civ. 08-10791) the Court on the 15th December 2008 to agree that ‘customers of the Defendant, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, are in need of the protection afforded by the’ SIPA, and in particular than the Court should order:

‘that all persons and entities are stayed, enjoined and restrained from directly or indirectly removing, transferring, setting off, receiving, retaining, changing, selling, pledging, assigning or otherwise disposing of, withdrawing or interfering with any assets or property owned, controlled or in the possession of the Defendant, including but not limited to the books and the records of the Defendant, and customers’ securities and credit balances, except for the purpose of effecting possession and control of said property by the Trustee’ (who was named as Irving H. Picard), with the firm of Baker and Hostetler LLP appointed Counsel for the Trustee.

Baker and Hostetler LLP has been established for 90 years and has offices in Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Cosa Mesa, Denver, HOUSTON, Los Angeles, New York, Orlando, Washington DC, Brazil and Mexico. Having been ordered to be appointed Trustee under SIPA via the SEC and Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Irving J. Picard proceeded to JOIN the New York office of Baker & Hostetler LLP, per the firm’s Press Release, dated 22nd December 2008 headed: ‘Court-Appointed Trustee In Madoff Fraud Investigation Joins Baker Hostetler in New York’.

Thus no sooner had the court-appointed Trustee, Irving H, Picard, been approved, than he joined the firm appointed as Counsel for the Trustee – raising the obvious question in the minds of this and other observers as to whether we have just uncovered a posible prospective inside stitch-up, the intent of which might logically be to control the exposure of information which would link the Madoff Master-Ponzi scheme and its subsidiary Ponzi operations directly with the Bush Sr.-Clinton Fraudulent Finance Crime Carousel, as has already been signalled above. It is not stated here that this IS the case: what is stated here is solely that the question has arisen.

A Memorandum of Law supporting the application of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (all related documents labelled Civ. 08-10791), filed on 15th December, stated inter alia that:

‘A proceeding under SIPA is a liquidation proceeding. The Trustee has the same powers and title with respect to the broker-dealer and its property as a Trustee in bankruptcy, including the right to avoid preferences. SIPA does not attempt to make all customers whole [see above] and SIPC is not an insurer of customer accounts. SIPA establishes a plan of limited protection via the liquidation proceeding, in which SIPC’s role is carefully delineated’.

‘It contemplates that customers’ claims will be satisfied to the maximum extent possible from the assets already on hand with the member… SIPA was not intended for the protection of brokers and dealers. However, after a liquidation proceeding is commenced to protect a member’s customers, SIPA authorizes the Trustee to close out certain contractual commitments between the members and another broker-dealer. This authority was designed to avoid the so-called “domino effect”, namely, the chance that the demise of a member might precipitate the failure of one or more other broker-dealers’.

‘Under SIPA Sec 78eee(b)(1), the Court is required to issue a protective decree if the Court finds that any of the conditions specified in the legislation exists, each of which is ‘a clear manifestation of serious difficulties that create, at the very least, an unacceptably high risk of loss of customer property for which the Defendant is responsible and accountable’.

The application by SIPC concluded:

‘According to information provided by the Commission and FINRA [the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority], the Defendant is insolvent, is unable to meet its obligations as they mature, and is not in compliance with the requirements regarding financial responsibility under sections 15(c)(3) and 17(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. sections 78o(c)(3) and 78q(a) (2000), and [also] Commission Rules 15c3-1, 15C3-3 and 17a-3, 17 C.F.R. sections 240.15c3-1, section 240.15c3-3 and section 240.17a-3. Consequently, three of the conditions referred to in SIPA section 78eee(a)(3) and specified in SIPA section 78eee(b)(1) exist’.

‘Pursuant to SIPA section78eee(b)(1), if the defendant consents to the issuance of a protective decree, the Court “shall forthwith issue a protective decree”’.

On the same day, 15th December 2008, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC consented to the issuance of a protective decree by the Court, although whether this will in practice adequately serve the interests of the investors in the giga-Ponzi scheme, who were in many cases themselves operating subsidiary Ponzi schemes, remains to be seen. The obvious question in the mind of this investigator and others is: with the Court-appointed Trustee having joined the Court-appointed firm of Counsel, are we looking at a pre-prepared damage limitation operation carefully designed not to expose the corruption and to procure statutory remedies, but rather to cover up linkages which would provide further direct connections with the Bush-Clinton Fraudulent Finance Money Factory operations that have already been partially exposed by this service?

IF YOU THINK YOU’RE A VICTIM, THE FBI WOULD LIKE TO HEAR FROM YOU
On 18th December 2008, the FBI issued the following Press Release:

U.S. Department of Justice
Federal Bureau of Investigation

PRESS RELEASE
26 Federal Plaza
New York
NY 10278

For Immediate Release

December 18, 2008

U.S. v. Bernard L. Madoff
http://newyork.fbi.gov/pressrel/2008/nyfo121808.htm

If you believe that you have been a financial fraud victim in the above captioned matter, please provide the following information:

(1) Full name
(2) Mailing address
(3) Phone number
(4) COPIES of any documents that substantiate your loss (do not send original documents)

Please mail this information to:

FBI New York
ATTN: Victim Assistance Office
26 Federal Plaza
23rd Floor
New York, NY 10278

Madoff’s offices on Madison Avenue have been guarded 24 hours a day, partly to prevent attacks by irate scammed investors, with the office sealed since Bernard L. Madoff was arrested, while FBI, Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities Investor Protection Corporation and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority investigators conduct urgent forensic examinations of Mr Madoff’s multiple sets of books.

Because no information is yet available on the value of the leveraged and hypothecated ‘money OUT’ numbers, the focus, as noted above, has so far been (and may remain) on the ‘money IN’ losses attributed (as at the end of 2008) to investors and operators of sub-Ponzi schemes in the Madoff giga-Ponzi operation. Here is an interim list, based upon open data available at the end of 2008, of the affected parties, whose funds have been STOLEN, not lost:

INTERIM LIST OF ‘MONEY IN’ LOSERS ARISING FROM THE DELIBERATE COLLAPSING
OF THE MADOFF COMPONENT OF THE GLOBAL PONZI MONEY MACHINE*

*Note: Data extracted from open sources. Some data varies between source.

Abu Dhabi Investment Authority [at least $400 million]
Access International Advisors, René-Thierry Magon de La Villehuchet [$1,400 million]
Aozora Bank (Japanese bank) [$230 million]
Ascot Fund [Gabriel Capital, Ascot Partners] [$0.92 billion]
Ascot Partners [Gabriel Capital], hedge fund founded by L Ezra Merkin [$1,800 million]
AXA (French insurer) [$123 million]
Banco Santander, Optimal Investment Services, Geneva [$2,870 million-$3,100 million]
Bank Medici (Austrian Bank, believed bankrupted) [$2,100 million]
Banque Bénédict Hentsch & Cie [$47.5 million -$48.8 million]
BBVA (Spanish bank) [$369 million -$404 million]
Benbassat & Cie [$935 million]
BNP Paribas SA [initially $431-$478 million, later ‘billions of Euros of losses’]
Braman, Norman, former owner of the Philadelphia Eagles [$ unknown]
Bramdean Alternatives (Mrs Nicola Horlick) [9.5% of assets]
Caissse de Dépots et Consignations [$1.4 million]
Carl and Ruth Shapiro Family Foundation [see Carl Shapiro]
Carl Shapiro, former Chairman of Kay Windsor, Inc, apparel) [$545 million]
Chais Family Foundation [$ unknown]
Clal Insurance $0.8 million]
CNP Assurances [$4.1 million]
Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun [$3.5 million]
Crédit Mutuel [$124 million]
Dexia Bank [$107 million]
EIM Group (European investment firm) [$230 million]
Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity [$15.2 million: 100% loss]
Eric Roth, film writer [$ unknown]
Fairfield Greenwich Advisors & Group, Walter Noel [$7,500 million]
Fairfield Sentry/Sigma Fund [see Fairfield] [$7.28 billion]
Fairfield, CT (town pension fund for public employees) [$42 million]
Feinstein, Leonard, co-founder of Bed Bath & Beyond [$ unknown]
Fix Asset Management [$400 million]
Fortis Bank, Nederland (Dutch bank) [$1,350 million-$1,400 million]
Gerald Breslauer, Los Angeles financial adviser [$ unknown]
Gift of Life Bone Marrow Foundation [$1.8 million]
Great Eastern Holdings, Singapore [$64 million]
Groupama [$13.6 million]
Harel Insurance [$14.2 million]
Harley International Ltd [Cayman: all its assets: $2.76 billion managed as at end-October 2008]
Henry Kaufman, economist [$ unknown]
Herald USA [see Bank Medici] [$2.50 billion]
HSBC Holdings [$1,000 million]
Hyopswiss (Swiss private bank) [$50 million]
Jeffrey Katzenberg [$ unknown]
JEHT Foundation [$ unknown]
Jewish Federation of Greater Washington [$10 million]
Jewish Foundation of Greater Los Angeles [$6.4 million]
Julian J. Levitt Foundation [$6.0 million]
Kevin Bacon, actor [$ unknown]
Kingate Global Management [FIM Advisors] [$2.75 billion – $3,500 million]
Korea Life Insurance [$50 million]
Lautenberg, Senator Frank and family foundation [$ unknown]
Liliane Bettencourt, L’Oréal SA heiress [$ billions unknown]
LuxALPHA SICAV – American Selection [Ascot International Advisors] [$1.4 billion]
M & B Capital Advisers (Spanish bank) [$52.8 million]
Madoff Family Foundation [$19 million]
Maimonides School [Up to $5 million]
Man Group (British hedge fund) [$360 million]
Maxam Capital Management (CT-based fund of funds) [$280 million]
Mediobanca [$0.7 million]
Merkin, Ezra, Chairman of GMAC Corporation: see Ascot Partners
Mirabaud [$ several million]
Mortimer B. Zuckerman Charitable Remainder Trust [$30 million]
Natixis (French investment bank) [$554 million]
Neue Privat Bank [$5.0 million]
New York Law School through Ascot Partners [At least $3 million]
Nomura Holdings [$304 million]
Nordea Bank (Swedish bank) [$59 million]
North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health Care System [$5.7 million
Notz Stucki [$ unknown]
Optimal Strategic US Equity [see Santander] [$3.23 billion]
Picower Foundation [$958 million: has announced closure]
Pioneer Alternative Investments [$280 million]
Primeo Select Fund US [UniCredit. Pioneer Alt Invs] [$0.85 billion]
Ramaz School [$6.0 million]
Reichmuth, (Swiss private bank) The Reichmuth Matterhorn Fund [$327 million]
Robert J. Lappin Charitable Foundation [$8 million: 100% loss]
Royal Bank of Scotland [$599 million-$625 million]
Rye Select broad market Fund [see Tremont] $3.10 billion]
SAR Academy [$1.2 million]
Senator Frank R. Lautenberg’s Charitable Foundation [$ unknown]
Société Générale [$13.8 million]
Stephen Spielberg [$ unknown]
Sterling Equities [[$ unknown]
Swiss Life Holding (Swiss insurer) [$78.9 million]
Thema International Fund [see Bank Medici] [$1.10 billion]
Tremont Group Holdings, hedge fund of Massachusetts Mutual Life [$3,300 million]
Tufts University [$20 million]
UBI Banca (Italian bank) [$86 million]
UBS AG [$ unknown]
UniCredit (Italian bank) [$92 million]
Union Bancaire Privée (Swiss bank) [$700 million -$1,080 million]
Vincent Tchenguiz, UK property magnate, via Bramdean [£40 million]
Wilpon, Fred, owner of the New York Mets [$ unknown]
Wunderkinder Foundation, Steven Spielberg [$ unknown, heavy Madoff investor]
Yeshiva University, New York [$110-$125 million: but see text above]
Zuckerman, Morton, Chairman of Boston Properties, landlords of the Citibank offices at 399 Park Avenue and owner of The New York Daily News and U.S. News and World Report [significant losses through a fund that invested substantially all of its assets with Madoff’]

FORMER PRESIDENT CLINTON FORCED TO REVEAL HIS ‘DONORS’
Finally, in a further indication that the skids are well and truly under the highest-level financial fraudsters, we must add that former President Clinton released what The New York Times called ‘a complete list’ of more than 200,000 ‘donors’ [sic] to the William J. Clinton Foundation ‘as part of an agreement to douse concerns about potential conflicts of interest if Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is confirmed as the Secretary of State in the Obama Administration’. The list revealed that ‘some of the world’s richest people and most famous celebrities handed over large checks to finance his Presidential Library and charitable [sic] activities’.

The New York Times’ articles [19th and 20th December 2008] did not, however, mention that the Clinton Library is equipped with some of the most sophisticated state-of-the-art eavesdropping and electronic equipment in the world, and that the new list of donors and donations (of which a small selection is appended below) is indicative of a ‘you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours’ approach, also known in the United States as ‘pay to play’.

• The disclosure of these names represents a component of a deal intended to smooth the way for Mrs Clinton to be confirmed and to move seamlessly into the State Department. On 4th January, the facile British Press was praising Mrs Clinton as ‘an honest broker’. Manifestly, Fleet Street uses a dictionary not available to the rest of us. It would be helpful if the stupid UK journalists concerned would belatedly look up the word ‘honest’ in the Oxford English Dictionary.

Funds for the Katrina disaster were channelled corruptly into a joint ‘foundation’ controlled by George H. W. Bush Sr. and former President Clinton, under the ‘nose’ of the complicit or feeble Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA, originally funded with ‘Black Ops’ drug money).

The fate of the Katrina money has subsequently been ‘successfully’ obfuscated by the highest-level current and former office-holding criminal financiers, so that it is currently not possible to identify Katrina funds having been moved into the William J. Clinton Foundation: but logic would suggest that this would have occurred, and/or that the funds were used to finance illicit below-the-radar financial leveraging transactions, in the usual manner.

The ‘deal’, brokered by the Obama team represented by its co-chairwoman Valerie Jarrett, reflects a 5-page Memorandum of Understanding signed on 12th December 2008 with the William J. Clinton Foundation, represented by its Chief Executive, Bruce R. Lindsey. This Memorandum required Mr Clinton to disclose his past donors by the end of 2008 and any future contributors once a year.

It also required that that ‘if’ Mrs Clinton is confirmed, the Clinton Global Initiative, an offshoot of the Foundation, will be incorporated separately, will no longer hold events outside the United States and will refuse any further contributions from foreign governments.

More vaguely, other initiatives operating under the auspices of the Foundation would follow new rules and consult with US State Department ethics officials in certain circumstances. (There is of course no reference in the document to any requirement that the ‘ethics officials’ have oversight over the intended illicit financial activities of the criminal operative Hillary Clinton in the event that, as intended, this Jezebel winds up as Secretary of State).

Previously, Mr Clinton had declined to reveal the identities of donors to his Foundation, as Federal law does not require former US Presidents to reveal foundation donors. Clinton’s main argument had been that many donors expected confidentiality.

Yet, all of a sudden, this ‘concern’ was jettisoned, in the scramble to ensure that Mrs Clinton arrives at the State Department without being cuffed and jailed or bailed on the way.

To mask this U-turn, Clinton advocates waffled following the disclosures that the list showed that Mr Clinton had nothing to hide, which is NOT the point that Clinton relied upon earlier when he declined to publish the list in order to preserve the confidentiality of the donors. Many of these parties will certainly have been chagrined at the emergence of their identifies as Clinton donors, into the public domain – not least because as this concatenation of immense financial scandals progressively expands like a solar explosion, they risk their names being dragged into the sewer along with those of the Clinton criminals themselves.

PARTIAL LIST OF CLINTON FOUNDATION ‘DONORS’
The following partial list of prominent ‘donors’ to the William J Clinton Foundation has been assembled to illustrate the ‘pay-to-play’ dimension of the way these crooks operate, lifting the veil on how these organised US gangsters have spread their filthy corruption throughout the world:

• Selected prominent donors to the William J. Clinton Foundation out of a total of 200,000 donors named by former President Clinton on 18th December 2008 in the interests of ‘transparency’ but contrary to the interests of the donors and as part of the deal to infiltrate Mrs Clinton into the State Department, where she will be ‘protected’ and from where the intention is that the fraudulent finance operations will continue:

Absolute Return for Kids [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Abu Dhabi Ruling Family [$ not known by this service]
Alfonso Fanjul [$ not known by this service]
Alix Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Amar Singh [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Arnold H. Simon [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Ausaid [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Australian Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Barbra Streisand/Streisand Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Bernard L Schwartz [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Blackwater Training Center [$ not known by this service]
Blackwater Training Center [$ not known by this service]
Bloomberg L.P. [$ not known by this service]
Bren and Melvin Simon [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Brunei Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Cameron Diaz, actress [Between $25,001 and $50,000]
Children’s Investment Fund Foundation, [More than $25 million]
Citi Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative, Canada [$1,000,001 to $5.0 million]
Copresida-Secretariado Tecnico [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Denise Rich [Brand], former wife of Marc Rich [Hans Brand] [$250,001 to $500,000]
Dominican Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Dubai Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Eli and Edythe Broade Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
ELMA Foundation [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Elton John AIDS Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Entergy Corporation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Frank Giustra, CEO, Radcliffe Foundation [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Fred Eychaner [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Freddie Mac [$ not known by this service]
Friends of Saudi Arabia [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Gilbert R. Chagoury [Nigerian President Abacha crony] [$1,000,00 to $5.0 million]
Government of Brunei Darussalam [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Government of Norway [Between $5,000,001 and $10 million]
Haim Saban and Saban Family Foundation [Between $5,000,001 and $10 million]
Howard and Michele Kessler [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Howard Gilman Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Hunter Foundation [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Issam M. Fares & Wedge Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
James P. Greenbaum Jr. Family Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
John D. Mackay [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Kuwait Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Lakshmi N. Mittal [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Lukas H. Lundin [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
MAC AIDS Fund [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Mala Gaonkar Haarmann [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Michael and Jena King [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Michael Schumacher [Between $5,000,001 and $10 million]
Michael Smurfit [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Harold Snyder [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Nasser al-Rashid [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Nationale Postcode Loterij [Between $5,000,001 and $10 million]
Norwegian Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Omani Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Open Society Institute (George Soros) [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Paul Reynolds [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Presidential Inaugural Committee [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Princess Diana Memorial Fund [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Qatari Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Richard Caring [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Robert L. Johnson [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Robertson Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Rockefeller Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable and Educational Trust [$1,000,001 to $5.0 million]
Rupert Murdoch [$ not known by this service]
S. D. Abraham [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Sheikh Mohammed al-Amoudi [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Smith and Elizabeth Bagley [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
State of Kuwait [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
State of Qatar [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Stephen L. Bing [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Sterling Stamos Capital Management [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Sultanate of Oman [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Suzlon Energy [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Swiss Reinsurance Company [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Sydney E. Frank Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
T. G. Holdings [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Taiwan Economic and Cultural Office [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Taiwan Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Theodore W. Watt [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Tom Golisano [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Unitaid [More than $25 million]
Victor Phillip Dahdaleh Charitable Foundation [$1,000,001 to $5.0 million]
Victor Pinchuk, Ukrainian oligarch [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Wallace W. Fowler [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Wal-Mart Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Walter H. Shorenstein [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Walton Family Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Wasserman Foundation [Between $5,000,001 and $10 million]
Zayed Family [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]

CONCLUSION: U.S. DOLLAR REFUNDING MUST PROCEED AS DEMANDED BY THE G-7
Since the State Department controls much of the money operations, it is clear that the objective of the controlling corrupt “powers” has indeed been to continue the fraudulent finance operations from within the White House and the US Treasury for the next four or eight years, as previously: in other words, the fraudulent, debt-generating exotic financing was to continue seamlessly with a replacement set of highest-level fraudulent finance operatives in place, many of whom (led by Mrs Clinton and Rahm Emanuel) were/have been involved in this terrorism financing activity all along.

That is the objective ‘as we speak’. Will it be achieved? It is understood, to begin with, that former President Bill Clinton was captured some time ago on a videotape made in Alabama, referring to President-Elect Obama in disparaging ethnic terms. We have now learned that outgoing President George W. ‘Dog’ Bush is also on record as describing to Mr Obama in comparable language. Both these racist outbursts have been channelled back to the President-Elect, who reportedly laughed at the perpetrators. But ingrained in this response, we were told, was the following message:

‘You can be rude about me now, if you like. But wait and see what I’m made of when I am in power’.

Being interpreted, this means (we speak with ‘understanding’) that if you imagine that you can pressurise me, you have yet to learn what resources I can bring to bear to make you think again.

Therefore, whether the incoming President will in fact allow the fraudulent finance operations to continue seamlessly, thereby ensuring a colossal financial and economic implosion worldwide early in his Administration, the collapse of gigantic corrupted US and foreign institutions, the destruction of his Presidency and Law and Order, and the collapse of the US dollar plus an immediate reversion to ‘beggar-thy-neighbour’ competitive currency devaluations and a bitter global trade war followed by open warfare remains, in our view, on a knife-edge at this time.

• But the central issue THAT NO-ONE CAN POSSIBLY ESCAPE, is this:

DOLLAR REFUNDING CAN ONLY BE DONE BY GENERATING REVENUE, NOT DEBT
The US dollar needs refunding NOW, which cannot be done by the US Government at all, because the US Government CAN ONLY CREATE DEBT.

• IT CANNOT GENERATE REVENUE. No Government can GENERATE TAXABLE REVENUE.

The previous refunding of the US dollar was initiated by President Reagan and confirmed for public consumption by means of a communiqué dated 17th August 1982. The US dollar is in extreme need of a further refunding, to enable it to regain its capitalisation value and thus to renew the world’s international trading markets.

This can ONLY be done by means of the overdue Private Sector Refunding mechanism long since prescribed by the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme of Capital Markets operations, generating cash REVENUE and not DEBT – with substantial ongoing on-the-books tax accruals paid into the US Treasury, to break the century-long, sterile and now completely discredited US debt-financing orgy which has brought the United States to its current status as a pariah state, reliant on exporting terrorism to ‘get its way’ and provide open-ended pretexts for it to seize the resources of others.

For this US Dollar Refunding Programme to be viable, there must be third party auditing: and the Government and its Presidential Cabinet, with an Economic Team tainted by the fraudulent finance operations of previous Administrations, cannot, in any case, be relied upon, given past experience, to do so in an objective manner.

To preclude a catastrophic perpetuation of the degenerate fraudulent finance carousel system, which is bringing the world financial and real economies to the verge of irremediable breakdown, accompanied by the collapse of colossal financial institutions and the US dollar, full disclosure and disciplined transparent regulation in perpetuity are prerequisites.

NO SOLUTION IS AVAILABLE OTHER THAN ON-THE-BOOKS.

It CANNOT be done off-the-books: and, despite immense Bush-Cheney bribery, if the Rest of the World sees the Obama Administration ‘trying this on’, and sidestepping the precise Group of Seven requirements, there will, as Senator C Dodd has said in another, related, context, be HELL TO PAY.

• WORLD-WIDE HELL TO PAY. THIS YEAR. PROBABLY IN THIS QUARTER.

SUMMARY: If the new Administration follows through with any ‘solution’ falling short of these long outstanding, pre-agreed G-7 standards, THE U.S. DOLLAR WILL COLLAPSE, the whole of humanity will suffer on a scale with no historical precedent, and the American Republic WILL NOT SURVIVE.

As the late, great Sherman Skolnik, who was right more often than wrong (sometimes he was completely off the wall, especially towards the end) used to day: Watch this space.

• References, Notes and the original Ponzi Scheme:

(1) Data courtesy of Victor Thorn, veteran researcher,
journalist and anti-New Underworld Order Author.

(2) Prudent Man Rule: This is the fundamental American principle that is applicable in respect of professional money management, originally asserted by Judge Samuel Putnum in 1830 as follows:

‘Those with responsibility to invest money for others should act with prudence, discretion, intelligence, and regard for the safety of capital as well as income’ [1830 Massachusetts Court decision: Harvard College v. Armory]. The Prudent Man Rule directs Trustees ‘to observe how men of prudence, discretion and intelligence manage their own affairs, not in regard to speculation, but in regard to the management and disposition of their funds, considering the probable income as well as the probable safety of the capital to be invested’. Investments in risky Ponzi and Pyramid Schemes and in ‘programs’ such as those referenced, typically breach the Prudent Man Rule.

Sources: (a) World Reports Limited website report dated 22nd July 2008 entitled: ‘U.S. market revamp is false prospectus’; (b) World Reports Limited website report dated 18th September 2008 entitled: ‘Michael C. Cottrell’s U.S. financial reform proposals; (International Currency Review, Volume 34, Number 1, THE COTTRELL PLAN, pages 243-272 and GLOSSARY, pages 293-326.

(3) On 13th and 22nd January 2007, this service SPECIFICALLY identified the methodology used by the CIA/Bush financial fraudsters as being based on the CLASSIC PONZI MODEL In retrospect, it is clear that few US Ponzi scam victims took the relevance of this on board. Now the name ‘Ponzi’ is finally all over the newspapers: but ONLY, so far, in the Madoff context. It needs to be applied to ALL THE INTERLINKED BUSH-CLINTON-CIA FINANCIAL SCANDALS, RIGHT ACROSS THE BOARD.
It is high time that our message in January 2007 was finally understood: PONZI is the STANDARD METHODOLOGY used for all these scamming operations mounted by criminalised US intelligence-linked cadres, to impoverish and steal from their victims AT HOME AND ABROAD. IT IS STANDARD PROCEDURE. The broken-hearted ‘package people’ investors are classic PONZI SCAM VICTIMS.

This is not, as some knee-jerk hysterics will claim, apologetics for the criminals: IT’S FACT. And the way to deal with FACT, however unpleasant, is to FACE IT. The way NOT to deal with FACT is to place one’s faith in ANONYMOUS SOURCES that, by definition, lack all credibility, whose reporting cannot be verified and which hide behind anonymity so that when they are caught out lying, they cannot be held accountable. These cowards are suspected by sane people of cynically peddling endless tall stories and disinformation that is fed to them for the self-evident purpose of keeping the scammed victims on the edge of their seats until they die. Beware of such faceless charlatans.

• MANY HAVE DIED WAITING FOR THEIR PIED PIPERS TO PLAY THEM A NICE CLOSING TUNE.

Website outlets focusing on keeping the scammed victims expecting payouts have now veered into total chaos mode, blaming everyone on earth from the probably recently deceased Madame Wu to Father Christmas in a deliberately shambolic and thoroughly cynical obfuscation offensive, designed EXCLUSIVELY to protect the perpetrators from the inevitable backlash and retribution that awaits them as soon as the scammed victims finally come to terms with the fact that they have been raped, pillaged, ransacked, and ‘hollowed out’. In readiness for the possibility that they’ll have to keep going for 8 more dreary years, targets have been switched from the Bushes to Obama.

The victims have all along been despised by the primary perpetrators, who couldn’t care less about their plight and are concerned EXCLUSIVELY with the protection of their assets and bodies against the days of reckoning that await them. The fact that the Omega Ponzi operations and related scams against private victims were perpetrated by the criminalised US intelligence community does NOT mean that the perpetrators will not receive their overdue come-uppance: it simply means that a war of attrition has to be waged against these devils, who have wrecked so many Americans’ lives.

(If the Editor is attacked for stating the truth after this posting, we will expose the backing behind the perpetrating website(s) involved in this outrageously cynical disinformation campaign).

The two initial reports in which we SPECIFICALLY exposed the Ponzi scamming dimension, which has of course now finally burst into the ‘mainstream’ with the ‘Madoff takedown’, were as follows:

(a) ‘US intelligence community OMEGA OPS/’Ponzi Game’ frauds’:
13th January 2007.

(b) ‘Treasongate background: Intel Ponzi Scamming:
Classic Ponzi Model for Unregistered Thievery’:
22nd January 2007

The report dated 22nd January 2007 containing our first posting of the summary of the classic Ponzi scam entitled ‘How Charles Ponzi pulled it off: Making a fine art out of a pyramid fraud’, was initially published in International Currency Review, Volume 27, Number 3, December 2001, pages 51-52.

• This text is now repeated immediately below, for ease of reference:

THE ORIGINAL PONZI SCHEME EXPLAINED: AGAIN, IN CASE YOU MISSED IT EARLIER
Charles Ponzi, an immigrant from Italy to Boston, MA, made millions of dollars for a brief period, by exploiting his shrewd observation that while national currencies were fluctuating wildly in 1920, just after the end of the First World War, the Universal Postal Union (UPU) issued coupons which were always worth a given amount of postage stamps.

In those days, European refugees were flocking to the United States, Canada and Brazil; and often, their only contact with their families and friends back home was an occasional letter, enclosing a few dollars. The Universal Postal Union arranged to move the millions of letters, standard business documents and messages across national borders by issuing Postal Reply Coupons. You bought a Postal Reply Coupon in your country of residence, and enclosed it with your letter.

Your mother, once she had received the letter, exchanged the Postal Reply Coupon for stamps at her local post office.

Charles Ponzi told friends in Boston: ‘Everybody’s heard of the Postal Union. They print coupons like these I’m holding here: Postal Reply Coupons. You can send a letter home, or anywhere in the world, with these coupons. And you can trade this coupon for a stamp in any country. I send my mother coupons with every letter that I write home’.

‘Now, in cooperation with certain large businesses in our city, I am making a fortune on the Postal Reply Coupon. Stocks are too risky. Forget it. And bonds, what are they paying right now? Maybe six percent? Savings accounts at Tremont Trust, they’ll give you four and a half cents on the dollar. Give them $100 and they’ll give you back $104.50. I can beat that into the ground’, Ponzi insisted, beating his cane against the floor. ‘My investors get 50 cents on the dollar. Place a hundred dollars with my Securities Exchange Company, and you take out $150. Put that $150 in, you’ll get back $225. That’s right, in six months, you can more than double your money’.

How could he pay 50%, when banks couldn’t even manage 5%? ‘Exchange rates’, Mr Ponzi explained. ‘Every morning I go down and check to see how the lira is doing against the dollar. Usually you get five lire for a dollar. This morning I checked, and with the war just ended, it takes 20 lire to the dollar’. While currency rates were bouncing around like popcorn, Mr Ponzi explained, the Postal Reply Coupon always bought one stamp. Here’s what I do’.

‘I send my cousin in Parma, Italy, $1.0. He exchanges the dollar for lire. With these 20 lire (2,000 centesimi), he can buy 66 Postal Reply Coupons (worth 30 centesimi each, the cost of a letter-sized stamp in Italy). Back in the United States, each of the coupons will buy one stamp, face value five cents. I redeem all 66 coupons for $3.30 worth of stamps. The magic happens in the exchange rate. In America, my dollar buys 20 Postal Coupons. But if I exchange the US dollar for lire, and buy the coupons in Italy, then return and buy the stamps in America, I get $3.30 worth of stamps for that same $1.0. My profit margin is 230%’.

‘Yeah, but $3.30 worth of stamps is still stamps’, complained an attentive listener.

‘I know’, said Ponzi. ‘So I sell the stamps at a 10% discount through my contacts with the larger firms downtown. Deducting the discount, I’ve got $3.0 cash now, from the $1.0 that I started out with.

Now, let’s say, I got that dollar from you. I will pay you back your dollar, plus 50 cents interest. Since I just sold $3.0 worth of stamps, I have a dollar and 50 cents for myself’.

‘I’m going to spend a third of that money on my offices and processing overheads, and a third on commissions and bonuses to my sales people; and then, ladies and gentlemen, I’m going to pocket the other third and take my wife for a stroll’.

This was the essence of the original Ponzi scheme. Note that in this description, Ponzi starts out by exploiting the fluctuations of exchange rates, and the lack of arbitrage; and note that, by the end of the explanation, he is simply offering 50% interest, which he pays out to old claimants out of the additional funds he has received from other investors who are likewise anticipating a 50% return on their investments, within a short space of time.

The germ of the idea was derived from the foreign exchange market; but once Ponzi has realised that people will pour money his way if they are promised a 50% return, he can finally abandon his elaborate explanation (‘his ‘prospectus’) of the exploitation of exchange rate fluctuations and the tedious task of shipping, receiving, handling and exchanging Postal Reply Coupons, which gave him the ‘easy money’ idea in the first place.

In other words, his sales pitch is no more than a now redundant, expendable illustration – a false prospectus which disguises the fact that he is really promoting a pyramid selling operation. For he has realised that all his investors care about is receiving 50% on their money. How this is to be achieved does not normally concern them.

By December 1920, Charles Ponzi was matching old money with ever larger amounts of new money. In May 1921 alone, almost $500,000 of new money poured into the Securities Exchange Company – as 1,500 or more new customers, lured by the 50% yield offered through advertisements, sought their share of the huge profits they thought would be forthcoming at minimal risk. The office now bulged with fat stacks of dollar bills.

THE FLOOR STARTS TO GIVE WAY BENEATH HIM
But problems started to arise when Joseph Daniels filed a lawsuit alleging that he had helped to found the Securities Exchange Company (SEC) with a loan of $230 worth of furniture plus $200 in cash. Daniels had indeed provided the beaten-up desks that had been offloaded in the dusty office, and had let Mr Ponzi have $200 to spark interest in the Postal Coupons.

It wasn’t simply a loan, Mr Daniels maintained, now that Mr Ponzi was drowning in cash. ‘We were partners. I put up capital and property’. On 2nd July, Mr Ponzi was handed a demand for $1.0 million.

The Boston Post telephoned, and Mr Ponzi told the reporter that he had indeed bought furniture from Mr Daniels, but that he had never received any money for investment from him.

But when the newly installed banking commissioner for Massachusetts, Joseph Allen, read the newspaper, he wondered: ‘Where did Ponzi come from? Who are his associates? How is he managing to double people’s money?’

Allen asked Ponzi to pop round to his office, for an interview. The Securities Exchange Company did not describe itself as a bank, nor did it offer any banking services. Therefore, in the absence of a complaint – and none had yet arrived – the Commissioner had no jurisdiction to examine Ponzi’s business. At the interview, Ponzi explained the curiosities surrounding Postal Coupons, pointed out that money chased money, collected his coat, doffed his hat, and bid Mr Allen goodbye.

But Richard Grozier, city editor at The Boston Post, had always thought that Charles Ponzi’s scheme was fraudulent; and to initiate what he fancied would indeed be the inevitable débacle, he elicited a comment from one of Boston’s leading citizens, Clarence Barron, the owner of Dow Jones & Co and The Wall Street Journal.

At the end of July 1920, The Boston Post carried a front page story entitled: ‘Clarence Barron questions the motive behind Ponzi’s scheme’.

Theoretically, Barron admitted, you could indeed turn a profit on the UPU coupons. But that was the only truth buried within the operation. You could never earn more than a few thousand dollars, not just because of the trouble involved in offloading the stamps and tracking the various conversions driving the process, but because there simply were not enough coupons available.

France, Romania and Spain had just abandoned the scheme, a few months earlier. A cursory check with the UPU showed that they had a few hundred thousand dollars’ worth of coupons in circulation – nowhere near the $10 million or $15 million Mr Ponzi claimed to be trading. So where was Ponzi getting his coupons from? Furthermore, the US Postal Service had announced, on 2nd July 1920, that Postal Reply Coupons would no longer be redeemable in lots larger than ten. So how was Ponzi converting his coupons into stamps?

Finally, Barron asked, if Ponzi is doubling everyone else’s money, why does he keep his own funds in regional banks? The Boston Post knew that Ponzi kept millions of dollars on deposit at seven or eight New England banks, and that the accounts were ballooning. How could a man who was paying 100% interest every 90 days, put up with drawing just 4% on his holdings? Barron concluded:

‘Right under the eyes of our Government, Mr Ponzi has been paying out US money to one line, with deposits taken from a succeeding line’ (another bank).

All of a sudden, all the doors which had flown back on their hinges at the sight of Mr Ponzi, were slamming tight shut. The Massachusetts District Attorney ordered Ponzi to cease and desist. His customers demanded their money back, and Ponzi was eventually jailed for Federal mail fraud, then deported. He wound up destitute in South America.

(4) The following documents were obtained by the Editor from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in December 2008:

1: Securities and Exchange Commission COMPLAINT vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791 filed 4:51pm 11 December 2008.

2: Securities and Exchange Commission COMPLAINT vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791 (LLS): Appointment of Receiver, Lee Richards, partner of Richards Kibbe & Orbe LLP ‘over all the assets and accounts of defendant Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“BMIS”) outside of the United States, to take control forthwith over BMIS’s dealings and transactions with any non-United States entity or counterparty, with full access to BMIS’s books and records necessary or useful to him in the exercise of his powers over BMIS’s foreign business or transactions’ signed by United States District Judge Louis L. Stanton at 6.42pm on 12th December 2008.

3: Securities and Exchange Commission ORDER vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791 (LLS) ECF Case: Order to show cause, Temporary Restraining Order and Order Freezing Assets and Granting Other Relief; Order consented to by defendants and therefore signed off by United States District Judge Louis L. Stanton at 4:51pm on 13th December 2008.

4: Securities and Exchange Commission and Securities and Investor Protection Corporation ORDER vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791: Appointing Irving H. Picard as Trustee and law firm Baker & Hostetler LLP as Counsel for the Trustee ‘with all the duties and powers of a Trustee as is prescribed by the Securities Investor Protection Act’, and inter alia authorising the Trustee ‘to take immediate possession of the property of the Defendant, wherever located, including but not limited to the books and the records of the Defendant, and to open accounts and obtain a safe deposit box at a bank or banks to be chosen by the Trustee’: signed by United States District Judge Louis L. Stanton at 4:08pm on 13th December.

5: Securities and Exchange Commission and Securities and Investor Protection Corporation ORDER vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791: Application to the Court of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC), signed and filed on 15th December 2008.

6: Securities and Exchange Commission and Securities and Investor Protection Corporation ORDER vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791: Memorandum of Law in support of the application to the Court of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation; signed and filed on 15th December 2008.

7: Securities and Exchange Commission and Securities and Investor Protection Corporation ORDER vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791: Consent by Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, signed by Bernard L. Madoff as ‘Sole Member’, to the service of the Complaint and the Application by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation, dated, notarised and filed on 15th December 2008.

8: United States of America v. Bernard L. Madoff: Case # 08 MAG 2735: AGREEMENT TO FORFEIT PROPERTY, signed by Bernard L. Madoff and Ruth Madoff on 17th December 2008 and filed on that date. The property forfeited: 133 East 64th Street, Apt 11A/PH, New York, NY 10065; 410 N. Lake Way, Palm Beach, FL 33480; 216 Old Montauk Highway, NY 11954.

9: Extensive miscellaneous related documentation.

George Orwell: ‘In an age of deceit, speaking the truth is a revolutionary act’.

US friend: ‘You are to be congratulated on a masterful piece of research in exposing the treason and the biggest heist in history’.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

MADAME WU DEMANDS U.S.TREASURY PAYMENT TODAY

UNTERREICHSFUHRER MAY BE PROVOKING A DEFAULT TO AVOID PAYMENT

Thursday 15 May 2008 13:27

CHENEY IS DESPICABLE ENOUGH TO ‘LET IT HAPPEN’: A WARNING IN ADVANCE OF THE EVENT

VICE PRESIDENT MALICIOUSLY INTERVENED TO STOP THE RELEASE PROCESS LAST NIGHT

CHINESE FINANCE MINISTER, ON THE WAR PATH, IS DEMANDING IMMEDIATE PERFORMANCE

UPDATE: SEE NEW INFORMATION ON FUNDING FOR THE TWO HUGE UK AIRCRAFT CARRIERS:
This update has been appended immediately below the main report…

NEW COMMENT ON BUSH’S ‘HITLER’ OBSERVATIONS IN THE ISRAELI KNESSET
Outrage is an understatement in describing the hypocrisy of President Bush’s comments in the Knesset [see, for instance: www.huffingtonpost.com], but the outrage has been focused on the obviously ludicrous stance adopted by Mr Bush on this score, given his family’s very widely known and publicised ongoing Nazi ties, and also given our exposure of George W. Bush Sr. as the DVD operative/agent that he is (as was recently reconfirmed by the presumed National Security Council (NSC) operative who ‘walked into’ the Editor’s London office before Easter).

But the point that has so far been completely missed is that, since we characterised Bush as Der Führer and Vice President Cheney as Unterreichsführer (which is of course exceptionally rude of us but, guess what, WE HAVE SO FAR HAD NO COMPLAINTS), this Knesset spiel can reasonably be interpreted as a response to our characterisation, the implied argument being that if Mr Bush has criticised ‘talking to Herr Hitler’ as ‘the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history’, our characterisation of this man as Der Führer ‘must’ be unfair.

We would be prepared to bet any of our subscribers a pint of Bass Ale at the Editor’s local hostelry that we do not receive ONE SINGLE GENUINE COMPLAINT ALONG THESE LINES. In short, we suggest that the ‘Hitler’ remarks represent a response to our published characterisation. We should point out also that being ‘unkind’ is not the Editor’s preference, but given the despicably serial criminal behaviour of these bandits over such a prolonged period of time, and the wrecks they have so ruthlessly made of so many people’s lives, the Editor is sorry to say that he just doesn’t care. And since we know that the arrogance continues, it gets worse by the minute…

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press ARCHIVE. Order your subscriptions and our ‘politically incorrect’, hence correct, intelligence books from the Edward Harle segment.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• The white panel below NEWS gives details of our intel titles/books as they are published.

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing financial global corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. The Editor’s $35,000 Wanta bail-out money has been stolen.

LONDON, 15th May 2008: Following repeated obfuscation operations orchestrated by the United States’ Unterreichsführer, Herr Reinhard B. ‘Himmler’ Cheney, since the Group of Seven financial powers’ final ‘go-ahead’ agreement ‘ratified’ at the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings convened in Washington, DC., on 13th April 2008, over ONE MONTH AGO, Madame Wu, the Chinese Finance Minister, has demanded that the US Treasury settle three Notes to the value of $35 trillion TODAY.

This demand follows an endless series of provocations, obfuscation charades, deceptions and lies perpetrated on Trustees and payees since the United States moved onto delayed Basel-II standard operational procedures effective at one minute past midnight on Monday morning, 14th April 2008,
following the G-7 final accord, which we reported on this website.

Last night (14th May), the ‘trigger’ was ACTUALLY PULLED for the releases. According to sources who have intervened while the Editor was completing this report, the pay releases were suddenly STOPPED and the system was shut down. This intervention has been traced to WASHINGTON, D.C.

Specifically, we have now been informed that the payouts were stopped on the instructions of the Unterreichsführer himself. So the question needs to be asked RIGHT NOW: HOW MUCH MONEY WAS MADE ILLEGALLY OVERNIGHT FROM THIS PARTICULAR STOPPAGE, USING OTHER PEOPLE’S MONEY, MR CHENEY? Madame Wu and others might be interested in your answer.

We are also advised that a significant number of towns in China may have been devastated by the earthquake there, and that in this context Madame Wu is described as INCANDESCENT WITH RAGE AND ON THE WAR PATH, DEMANDING IMMEDIATE RELEASE WITH NO FURTHER DELAYS. She needs the money not least to assist the Chinese earthquake victims.

MADAME WU GAVE THEM MORE TIME AND THEY DOUBLE-CROSSED HER AGAIN, PER USUAL
Before we knew about the latest sabotage of the Settlements by the Unterreichsführer, Madame Wu was reliably reported to have finally lost all patience with the serial criminality of the American Treasury, which is controlled by the Unterreichsführer and Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., who was nominated by criminalist President George W. Bush and took his seat on 29th September 2005.

French President Sarkozy, who was identified inside the Paribas building earlier this week, working with a key Trustee, is also now pressing for large monies owed to France, which put up some of the funds used for trading in Hong Kong in 2007. These monies are also grossly overdue, as the United States has basically raped everyone. Likewise, earlier this week, we were advised that the nine key recipient countries were to have been paid, which did not happen.

We have also been informed that a second delivery of ‘packages’ has been concluded (unverified by provenanced sources), but that these cannot be activated for the straightforward reason that the Big Trustees have not had their funds ‘released’. No-one can ‘spend’ until after that happens, with the exception (it now emerges) of the Illuminati categories (see below).

As previously reported, Madame Wu has what amounts to a Writ of Execution or Lien issued by the World Court/ICJ, and is supported in her endeavours by the Group of Seven (G-7) leading financial powers, the representatives of the 160 governments (who have been insulted and messed around by these high-level US criminals to our knowledge since last October), Her Majesty The Queen and her MI6 et al enforcement team, as well as by other powerful forces behind the scenes.

Everyone ‘who matters’ now understands that US Presidents 41, 42 and 43 have been playing with funds belonging to others (obtaining access to funds in innumerable ways, ‘clean’ and unclean) and defaulting on repayments, i.e. holding onto the money in order to make more money, in the belief that their powerful position exempted them from honouring ANY obligations at any time.

It is also now very well understood that the former Presidents carried on this criminal behaviour after leaving office. Bill Clinton ‘works/worked for’ President Bush Sr., who taught him that being President confers upon the holder of that office a lifetime’s opportunity to make colossal sums of money ‘with impunity’ (until now). It is also more widely understood ‘where it matters’ than was the case six months ago, that conference organisers who invite Dr Alan Greenspan to provide guests with the benefit of his latest penetrating thoughts, are either slow on the uptake, living in bankster land, irresponsibly ignorant about Greenspan’s embedded criminality, in denial, or just plain ga-ga.

PERFORMANCE IS REQUIRED IN FULL TODAY, WITH NO FURTHER OBFUSCATIONS
We are reliably advised that failing performance IN FULL today, and in the event of further blocking operations by the criminals, the Writ of Execution will be enforced and the necessary arrests will proceed. Madame Wu is further believed to have made it clear to the relevant parties in the United States that ‘your life as you know it will cease to exist if you do not perform TODAY’.

The Editor has obtained this and related information, which has been checked, from sources which have nothing to do with Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., whose own technical advice is highly prized by this Editor and others, but who is not the source of this particular intelligence.

The information comes from high-level payee sources whose identities cannot be divulged.

CHENEY MAY PROVOKE A DEFAULT: HE IS PERFECTLY CAPABLE OF SUCH AN OPERATION
The Editor contributes the following further elaboration. It is likely that the Unterreichsführer has in mind that the Treasury shall not perform today, so that the Treasury/United States will be declared in default. That would suit the Unterreichsführer down to the ground, for the following reasons:

• Since the United States would be in default, it could not ‘possibly’ pay (Cheney may think).

• The US Treasury’s default then becomes THE story, and everyone forgets about the Settlements.

Do we believe this is REALLY what this unspeakable character may have in mind? Answer: YES.

THE REASON WE ARE PUBLISHING THIS WARNING NOW
This explains why we are publishing this warning now. Because, if the United States defaults, the operative responsible for bringing this about will have been Unterreichsführer Richard B. Himmler, who will thereby have added one supreme count of TREASON to the multiple acts of treason that he has committed while occupying the second most powerful position in the United States, which he has used for unfettered personal self-enrichment purposes, and in pursuit of an internationalist agenda which is itself grossly treasonous and should have long since had him removed from office.

Let us hope that the Unterreichsführer, who though cunning can be said, from his actions, also to be exceptionally stupid, is not SO STUPID as to proceed in the manner described above.

ILLUMINATI PARTIES MAY HAVE BEEN PAID OFF AS WE ORIGINALLY THOUGHT
There have been persistent allegations that certain Iluminati parties have been paid off. Earlier, we were unable to verify this, but we have now received confirmation from inside sources that at least two of these parties received ‘their’ money. One of these was paid a colossal amount ($2.0 trillion) from the Marshall Act resource, a CIA fund which George H. W. Bush Sr. had been using as his own private trading platform; while another Illuminati recipient, which originally contributed big money and gold in conjunction with Bush Sr. financial operations, received cash and Treasury Securities. Since we now know that these two Illuminati recipients were paid, we think it can be taken as read that the other two recipients in that category have also been paid. In other words, as anyone who knows how these people operate would expect, the Illuminati paid off their own. In April 2008.

That would explain why the Unterreichsführer MAY THINK HE CAN PUSH THIS TO THE LIMIT, ‘as we speak’. On this analysis, too, the presumption that nobody can spend the money that they may be able to see on screens until the key payees at the top of the tree have all been ‘released’, may have a giant hole in it, labelled ‘ILLUMINATI’. One would expect these ruthless Dark Forces to pay themselves first, with the firm intention, if they can get away with it, of nobody else being paid.

In this connection, the Editor has been at the receiving end of harassing communications to the effect that ‘we Dark Forces have taken all the money’. These communications have been reported to US anti-terrorism enforcement, and to other US parties with powers of enforcement and arrest.

Within this abominable context, the Unterreichsführer might be content to ‘allow’ Madame Wu to ‘provoke’ a Treasury default (which is how it would be inaccurately portrayed), because the Dark Luciferian Forces have been paid: which is all they care about, with ONE exception: EXPOSURE.

FOUR WARRING GROUPS AT LOGGERHEADS INSIDE U.S. CRIMINAL ‘INTELLIGENCE’
Let it be known, therefore, that if this worst-case scenaro eventuates, it will most certainly have been orchestrated by the Unterreichsführer, in collaboration with Der Führer himself. These two walking nightmares are aided and abetted by TWO groups inside the shambolic, warring firmament known as the criminalised US ‘intelligence’ community, which are opposed by two other groups that have been pushing for the Settlements. The internal warfare between these four groups underlies the endless obfuscation and prevarication operations, accounting for the fact that, as the Editor was again informed by a reliable source this morning, ‘everyone has been and is being lied to’.

Given the Illuminati context alluded to above, we can assume that the two groups that have been blocking the Settlements are working for the Illuminati which, as the Editor explains separately in his book The New Underworld Order, is the primary cover used by the Pan-German (Nazi) long-range strategic deception ‘Black’ agency, Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst, Dachau (the Abwehr).

THE VISIT OF THE ‘WRONG’ OFFICIAL TO PHILADELPHIA ON 8TH MAY 2008
In our report dated 9th May 2008, it was noted that the Unterreichsführer visited the Philadelphia Regional Financial Center, part of the US Treasury Department’s Financial Management Service, on Thursday 8th May [source: Associated Press, so it’s the Government itself speaking].

We notice from our email correspondence that NOBODY has taken up this FACT in response to the preceding report dated 9th May. As mentioned, the official who would be expected to attend such a Treasury facility would be either the US Treasury Secretary or the Under Secretary of the Treasury, wouldn’t it? Do we hear the sound of pennies dropping here?

Herr Himmler told employees at that facility, which is printing the economic stimulus checks that will be delivered to more than 130 million Americans, that the payments represent ‘a shot of energy at the right time and in the right way’.

For ‘right time’, read ‘just ahead of the General Election’, and for ‘in the right way’, read ‘we needed a cover in case we are forced to pay, so that we have some COHERENT rationale for explaining the rather sudden improvement in the outlook that will ensue following the Settlements’.

This prospectively improved economic outlook has been flagged in recent days by Mr Mervyn King, the equivocal Governor of the Bank of England (who, however, has today yet again changed his ‘line’, asserting that a UK recession is ‘likely’), George Soros, several German bankers, and others, all of whom took their cue inter alia from the accord ‘ratified’ by the G-7 on 13th April.

BEWARE AGAIN: THESE PEOPLE OPERATE ON THE DIALECTICAL PRINCIPLE
However THE DIALECTIC, the standard practice of RUNNING TWO ‘LINES’ SIMULTANEOUSLY, also known as DUPLICITY or DOUBLEMINDEDNESS, the factor which so few people seem to understand, must be borne in mind at all times when dealing with these two-faced people.

Seen in this light, the Editor judges that the Unterreichsführer, whose grubby hand underlies this crisis, is liable usually to take the most extreme and dangerous decision, not least in the present context, because if the United States defaults, he may cynically judge that the payments can be shelved and fogotten about. The default will then be the main story for months and years to come.

One can deduce from his action in blocking the payments last night that he couldn’t care less what the outcome will be, such is his unfettered arrogance and defiance of the Rest of the World.

THOSE WITH POWERS MUST NOT FEEBLY HESITATE TO USE THEM NOW
Now, it is not for a ‘foreigner’, albeit a proud ‘honorary American’, to suggest, as many Americans have been doing in recent months, that not only is enough long since enough, but that those with powers of arrest MUST NOT FLINCH FROM EXERCISING THESE POWERS. Yes, we know what the constraints are, and they boil down to one word: BLACKMAIL.

The Unterreichsführer is a past-master, we understand, at deployment of this ‘Black Art’, which goes hand in hand with bribery.

Those who have ‘been accommodated’, but have ‘seen the light’ subsequently, may be constrained by their own haunted fears that their past misdeeds will catch up with them.

But the misdeeds of those at the summit of power, starting with TREASON, are far greater: and if those people are finally incapacitated because the international community simply will not stomach their arrogant defiance and criminality any longer, the fears of those members of the elite, or soi-disant ‘Great and the Good’, who may have been compromised by these villains in the past, will be alleviated. In any event, there is no alternative now.

HIGHLY RESPECTABLE PEOPLE INCONVENIENCED AND LIED TO FOR YEARS
We are constrained by requests for confidentiality from revealing what very high-level payees have been been saying to us for months, all their revelations being recorded and held in a highly secure location for future reference. These people and their associates have been inconvenienced on a prodigious scale, in some instances for years: ordered to appear at the banks, collected by their chauffeurs for aborted expeditions to meetings and institutions, locked in the Operations Rooms, watching inactive screens where their funds are clearly identified, in certain key cases having to accept the banks’ provision of sleeping facilities inside the institutions, while also being constantly troubled with brazen lies, diversionary information, unreliable messages and other manifestations of the complete collapse of standards and morality, while these bandits linked to the US criminal mafiosi play cynical games, exploiting the power they usurped by stealing two US elections.

Several distinguished parties have informed us that they possess information of such devastating consequences that it would destroy the criminalists, even if the US so-called ‘mainstream’ media, compromised by the CIA’s cynical ongoing ‘Operation Mockingbird’, were to remain, as it has been throughout this crisis, in conspicuous dereliction of its duty to hold the Executive to account.

SEND US THE INFORMATION: WE HAVE THE GUTS TO MAKE IT PUBLIC
This is what the Editor has to say to these people: send us the information immediately by a secure route. If no-one in the United States has the guts to do it, WE WILL DO IT.

And if all the compromising information that we already hold from such sources were placed in a single narrative, which this Editor is capable of doing, the Bush II United States would be exposed as the most duplicitous and brazenly untrustworthy nation to have polluted the face of the earth since the days of Hitler and his dialectical, ruthless comrade-in-crime, Stalin. Speaking of whom, some revealing information has emerged from the archives of Georgia and the fake ‘former’ Soviet Union, including the following, relating to Stalin’s endless criminalist operations in the Caucasus and elsewhere between 1905 and 1917. Further elaboration here would be superfluous:

• Stalin made a habit of threatening and blackmailing the Baku oil tycoons. These people were said to be ‘keen to pay up’ after ‘a ten-minute conversation with Stalin’.

• Stalin, who operated a clandestine printing press, perfected an extortion system using printed forms that read as follows:

‘The Bolshevik Committee proposes that your firm should pay …. roubles’.

• The oil tycoons paid up because they did not wish their oilfields to catch fire, or ‘accidents’ to befall their families. The felonies that Stalin unleashed on those who did not comply included robberies, assaults, extortion of rich families, and kidnapping of their children on the streets of Baku in broad daylight, followed by demands for ransom on pain of the child being executed’.

‘Stalin prided himself on being what he called a ‘praktik’, a practical hard man, an expert in what he called ‘Black work’, rather than a chatty ‘intelligent’, but his gift was for being both… Stalin had… ‘an electrical effect’ on his associates and collaborators’ (1).

Reference:
(1) ‘Young Stalin’, Simon Sebag Montefiore, published by Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London, 2007, ISBN 978-0-297-85068-7, pages 168-171.

• ADDENDUM: MORE ABOUT THE TWO BRITISH AIRCRAFT CARRIERS:
A correspondent has just sent us this additional information about the two huge (60,000 tonne) British aircraft carriers/warships which, as the Editor noted in the report dated 9th May 2008, are to be financed by funding from the Settlements. This is highly significant.

The source is the cited website:

http://www.bymnews.com/news/newsDetails.php?id=26544

“Our emphasis on engineering support services will increase when we form the shipbuilding and naval support Joint Venture with BAE Systems (that is, BVT Surface Fleet Limited). We have been reassured by the recent statements from HM Government and comments from the Prime Minister that the aircraft carrier project will go ahead. It has also been positive to see significant long lead forward orders being placed for equipment and steel for the ships’.

‘We understand that the Ministry of Defence is now in the final stages of its spending decision planning and we are optimistic that an announcement will be made shortly.”

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ANNEXE:

REITERATION OF THE STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, THEIR ASSOCIATES AND RELEVANT BANKSTERS ARE IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• ‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON IS IN BREACH AND OF WHICH THE SIX ‘LEVY BANKS’ MAY LIKEWISE BE VARIOUSLY IN BREACH [CREDIT SUISSE, UBS, DEUTSCHE BANK, BANK OF AMERICA, CITIBANK, THE BANK OF ENGLAND]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is/was in violation of:
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND BANKSTERS [see previous reports]:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

ARE THE ‘PAYOUTS’ BEING HIJACKED IN REAL TIME?

WHY WOULD THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES CEASE AND DESIST?

Sunday 27 January 2008 17:35

UPDATE, 30TH JANUARY 2007:

NOW BROWN COSIES UP TO SARKOZY, TOO
The British press has a large photograph of Gordon Brown, the Prime Minister, greeting Nicolas Sarkozy, the President of France, outside Number 10 Downing Strasse. Sarkozy has been reliably fingered by our very best sources as having interfered of late in the payouts, and is in league with his fellow specialist in High Crimes and Misdemeanours, President George W. Bushfraud, Jr. We are repeatedly assured that what we published recently on this subject is, in fact, accurate.

Gordon Brown has all of a sudden taken to being frightfully nice to the European Union Collective, which is a long-range anti-nation state entrapment counterintelligence operation based upon the Nazi blueprint promulgated in Europaische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft, the compendium of papers given by Nazi intellectuals and then published by Haude & Spenersche Verlagsbuchhandlung Max Paschke in Berlin in 1942. Copies of this crucial document exist in the British Library and in the Staastsbibliothek (Preussische Staastsbibliothek), Berlin. Or you can read all about this in the Editor’s book The New Underworld Order [see the books section of this website, to order].

No doubt the copy of Europaische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft which should be in the US Library of Congress has long since been suppressed, because it would reveal that Nazi strategy against the ‘Main Enemy’, of which Great Britain is a key component, has been successful, wouldn’t it.

Europaische Wirtschaftsgemeinchaft means ‘European Economic Community’, and the chapter headings of this wartime Nazi tome are almost identical to that of the Maastricht Treaty (1992).

BROWN, SARKOZY INTERVENE TO PREVENT PORTUGUESE REFERENDUM ON E.U. TREATY
On 9th January, The Times, London, revealed that Gordon Brown had telephoned the Portuguese Prime Minister, Jose Socrates, to ‘insist’ that there was no need for a referendum on the European Constitution (now called ‘Reform’) Treaty in Portugal. Like Brown, Socrates had promised a popular ballot on the issue, during an election campaign.

Following Brown’s telephone call to the Portuguese Prime Minister, who should then call Socrates but our dear friend M. Nicolas Sarkozy, the President of France, who delivered precisely the same message. In light of the telephone calls from Brown and Sarkozy, Herr Socrates stood on his head and told bewildered Portuguese MPs:

‘A referendum in Portugal would jeopardise, without any reason to do so, the full legitimacy of the ratification by national parliaments that is taking place in all the other European countries’.

HAS GORDON BROWN TAKEN THE STANDARD SECRET NAZI PAYOLA BRIBE?
From all of which it may be deduced that Gordon Brown, a British intelligence operative who knows everything there is to know about the issues we discuss in these reports (and so much more), is on the same page as President Sarkozy: which means that President Sarkozy’s intervention to impede the settlements is known at Number 10 Downing Strasse, leaving a BIG question mark over what Mr Brown’s role in all this may be. Is he impeding the settlements, too?

E.U. TREATIES PROCURED BY PAYOLA CORRUPTION
In that connection, we would like to draw your attention to the very first report that we published on this website, dated 12th October 2005 [see the Archive], entitled ‘EU Treaties procured by Payola Corruption’, in which we stated that European leaders and ‘facilitators’ were paid $100 million each (totalling $2.5 billion) for procuring the European Constitution Treaty, with a further $100 million each (totalling a further $2.5 billion) payable when the Treaty was ratified.

We further identified the secret Nazi slush fund located in Switzerland from which these corrupt payments were distributed. There remained some confusion over whether the second tranche of corrupt payments was remitted, since the European Constitution Treaty document was not ratified after the Dutch and French electorates rejected it at their referenda. Gordon Brown is now overtly collaborating with Sarkozy to prevent a repetition of any such setback this time round.

That in turn means that Gordon Brown is working hand-in-glove with the French and German anti-nation state cadres who are hell bent on destroying the residual independence and sovereignty of all the European nations, and consolidating them into one undemocratic collective dictatorship, in accordance with the secret long-range Nazi strategy that is exposed inter alia in the Editor’s book.

• FACT: Our exposure on 12th October 2005, and in International Currency Review, of the details of the ongoing corrupt payments made to European leaders and their treacherous henchmen to sign and obtain ratification of each successive version of the escalating EU ‘stitch-up’ Treaty, has never been officially or otherwise denied; and neither have ANY one of the dramatic exposures, including recent horrible shootings, published on this website, been officially denied. Period.

It would be much too dangerous for the corrupt official forces concerned to attempt to deny what we have exposed; so the ‘safe’ course that has been adopted is to ignore our reports altogether, while from time to time trying (per their standard practice) to shoot and discredit the messenger.

• Which tells you all you need to know.

COW-TOWING TO BRUSSELS, SARKOZY AND BERLIN
Since it has always been ‘normal practice’ for these EU slush fund payments to be distributed at the completion and ratification stages of each successive escalated version of the ongoing, rolling EU Collective’s Treaty (which is a subversive, corrupt mechanism for the final suppression of national sovereignty and identity), the question arises: Has Gordon Brown taken the German slush bribe?

If so, that would explain why, all of a sudden, his sullen indifference to the European Union and all its corrupt and nefarious works, has dissipated with the emergence of the bright winter sunshine.
And it would explain why he appears to believe that being nice to the President of France, a high-level operative who has been fingered as being engaged in corrupt financial operations, is liable to reap dividends. For Brown personally, not for the future of Britain as an independent state?

The report posted on 27th January is as follows:

EVA TELEKI AND MARC RICH RE-OUTED AS STASI [= DVD] OPERATIVES

GORDON THOMAS AND THE ABORTED MI6 ATTEMPT TO DISCREDIT THIS EDITOR

MI6 TRIED TO BLACKMAIL THE EDITOR IN 2004, TO STOP HIM HELPING WANTA:

NOW IT IS CONTENT WITH THE OUTCOME AND IS BEING HELPFUL, WE UNDERSTAND

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for our ‘Wantagate’ reports since April 2006.

• The white panel below NEWS gives details of our intelligence titles as they are published.

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing financial global corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Our Wantagate reports been calling all the shots, given the hijacking of Wanta’s Settlement. This is the 91st Wantagate report: over a million words to date.

WHY WOULD THE THEFTS CEASE WITH THE ACTUAL PAYOUTS?
What is the basis for the unspoken assumption that the criminal thefts would be liable to cease once the actual payouts have begun – assuming that is the case, which is not confirmed and which may itself be disinformation? It has no basis in common sense, surely. On the contrary, using the street bank raid model, what is the moment of the high street branch’s greatest vulnerability?

Why, it must be when the armoured cash transportation vehicle draws up outside the bank, and two helmeted couriers jump out, enter the bank and engage with the bank staff for the transfer of the funds. Is that not when the bank is most vulnerable to being robbed?

And may that not well be the situation prevailing ‘as we speak’?

Why would the most ruthless and reckless world-class Fascist-global dictatorship criminals stop their stealing and wholesale, open-ended criminality, which has been funding their grab for total global power, just because the actual payout processes, triggered by Wantagate, have begun?

Surely, they would have prepared for precisely this eventuality, and would now have switched (in accordance with their standard ‘bait and switch’ formula) to Plan B – namely the daylight robbery of the funds as they are being transferred?

All sorts of devices and ‘solutions’ to their predicament present themselves. For starters, how about the sudden discovery of vast ‘Black holes’ at banks infested with rats, such as the Societe Generale? Begin by revealing that a ‘lone’ rogue trader had been ‘caught’ in the act of trying to cover up unauthorised trades that had generated losses, initially ‘estimated’ at $7 billion.

Then add a nought onto the $7 billion, pending an imminent decision to add a further nought – so that before you can say ‘Merde’ more than once, the ‘Black hole’ has expanded to $700 billion.

Awfully convenient device, this.

TIMELY SUDDEN ‘BLACK HOLES’ EMERGE FROM NOWHERE
Note that in the above model, the B of ‘Black’ is capitalised here. Right. Because it’s probably yet another ‘Black Operation’ – designed to ‘vanish’ in this case, $700 billion, from scrutiny.

Mind you, a rogue trader can’t do stuff like that on his tod.

Nope, there are certainly lots of rats behind the ‘Black hole’ in question.

And behind the others that will surface over the next days and weeks, you bet.

Now in any contrived ‘Black hole’ criminal financial environment, opportunities for the standard Luciferian criminal practice of DUPLICATION abound. So what, then, is going on? Well, the payout funds may have been ransacked or are being ransacked or are targeted for ransacking, have been duplicated, are being duplicated or are targeted for duplication right now.

That’s what may be going on.

So we shouldn’t just sit here complacently and think: ‘Great, this crisis is nearly over. The payouts are proceeding’, without contemplating the strong probability that the unrepentant criminal cadres have switched to Plan B and are raiding the payouts in ‘real time’.

Now, it is true that there are FOUR teams using enhanced PROMIS-based software 24/7, so that each and every illegal transaction can be and is being traced, as it occurs. Fine. But when did that knowledge prevent the crims from carrying on stealing, in any way, shape or form? It has not done so in the recent past: why would such surveillance be liable to stop the thefts at this late stage?

THE CRIMINAL CADRES ARE DESPERATE
These people are desperate. Their bank accounts have been largely frozen. Many have fled since Wantagate became public knowledge. Others have been arrested en masse and are languishing today in such delightful locations as Belmarsh Prison at her Majesty’s Pleasure, as terrorists.

Others are on the brink of being arrested under European terrorism laws – in a delightful contra-use of the very weapon that these criminal minds invented to suppress the Rest of Us.

Senior and lesser US officials have been shot in the chest at point blank range, and others will certainly, we are led to believe, suffer a similar dreadful fate. The bloodletting that started some time ago is believed to be continuing, both figuratively and literally. So why, we must ask, should we assume that the actual payout process would not be hijacked, as well?

Doesn’t the world YET UNDERSTAND that the Germanic/Zionist Luciferian mentality we are dealing with, NEVER KNOWS WHEN THE GAME IS UP?

At Dachau, the Nazis and the Zionazis collaborate. That’s the big secret, the essence of the classic ‘sib’ operation, whereby the assumed victim is the perpetrator.

This does not implicate the Jewish and German peoples generally: only a tiny proportion of them. Unfortunately for the rest of their communities, Wantagate has compelled the Rest of the World to become more keenly aware of how far these criminal operatives are prepared to go to get their way.

‘For us the war has never stopped and, as is well known, in war every ruse is possible’ – From the Madrid Circular Letter, dated September 1950, intercepted by the Western Allies while en route to Bonn, Rome, Barcelona, Buenos Aires and South Africa. See our report dated 22nd January 2008.

So, it would be entirely in character with the nature of this unprecedented, millennial, crisis and with the Luciferian mentality of the Black perpetrators involved, for the stealing, the deception, the double-cross, the diversionary claptrap and all the other filthy devices that these people routinely use to blow smoke in our faces, to be continuing, given that they have their backs to the wall.

The Editor recalls a metaphor he used quite recently, that can be summarised as follows:

I stamp on your foot. There is no response. I stamp on your foot again. There is no response. As I stamp on your foot for the third time, I shout in your face; ‘I have just stamped on your foot’. There is no response. No, because we are dealing de facto with the ‘possessed’.

It is a fact that the possessed POSSESS great and horrifying physical strength.

They may not even know when they are being confronted, because they live in a parallel world that is 100% conditioned by their criminal mentality. It is quite possible that some of these odious people haven’t even yet realised that they are being faced down, as this has never happened before.

And because it has never happened before, and they have got away for decades with their bank raids – starting in earnest with the stealing of Ambassador Wanta’s $27.5 trillion, with which the Black Forces have been financing their global Fascist takeover offensive – they may still imagine that what they face right now is just a blip in their plans, which will be smoothed over as soon as they gain the upper hand – like when Hillary Clinton has been installed in the White House, possibly with Bill Clinton as her Veep. That’s the macro-plan, and they are sticking to it.

UNRELIABLE ENFORCEMENT ARMS: INTERPOL AND MI6
In the preceding report [25th January 2008], we stated that the two enforcement arms deployed to ensure that the payouts are implemented without any further stealing, are Interpol and MI6.

This hardly encourages one to have confidence in a satisfactory outcome. Interpol is believed, like all New World Order collectivist international organisations, to be thoroughly corrupt and capable of being manipulated. As for MI6, it is penetrated and divided, just like the CIA.

Furthermore, MI6 attempted, in 2004, to discredit the Editor of this service. Full details of that operation were published in International Currency Review, Volume 30, Numbers 20 and 3, on pages 27-39, dated January 2005.

What happened was as follows. The Editor visited the well-known veteran journalist and author Gordon Thomas in Bath, Somerset, on 18th November that year, for a general discussion about geopolitical developments. Instead of enjoying such a chat, the veteran journalist, who has close MI6 contacts, proceeded to divulge to the Editor that MI6 had recently distributed to the gullible British ‘mainstream’ media two packages of disinformation fairytales about the Editor.

HOW MI6 TRIED TO DISCREDIT THIS EDITOR IN 2004
The first concerned some farrago about a figure called Bernie Eccleston, and some motor racing venture of his in Monaco, with which the Editor was supposed to have been involved. The Editor has never participated in any venture other than his own businesses, which are self-supporting and have never accepted funding from any outside source.

The second piece of invented MI6 claptrap concerned a concocted lie about the Editor’s alleged involvement with Mark Thatcher in the aborted Equatorial Guinea scandal, the suggestion being that the Editor was among sources that had helped to finance the operation. The Editor has done NOTHING since the early 1970s, when he acquired ownership of International Currency Review, but write and produce the publications advertised on our website. He has never funded or contributed to anything other than his own wholly-owned publishing businesses.

He is not interested in any other ventures, and never has been.

The following conversation ensued with Gordon Thomas [see page 33 of International Currency Review, Volume 30, #’s 2 & 3. Date of the conversation: 18th November 2004:

Editor: ‘It’s obvious that this mad fantasy about our supposed links with Mark Thatcher and the Equatorial Guinea botch and scandal comes from the same source [as the drivel about Bernie Ecclestone], namely MI6’.

Gordon Thomas: ‘That’s right’.

Editor: ‘Who did you obtain this [Mark Thatcher libel] from: were they high-up sources?’

Gordon Thomas: ‘I heard this very recently… yes, one of them is [a high-up source]. I would describe the other as middle management’.

Editor: ‘So what makes them do something like this? What drives them to make up such ludicrous stories and lies, when they know that they can’t make anything stick’ (since the whole pack of lies is a crude and clumsy, ignorant invention. The Editor has done nothing else since 1963 but editing and publishing, which takes up 150% of his time).

Gordon Thomas: ‘It’s not necessary for them to prove anything. All they need to do is to make allegations. That’s all they need to do’.

Editor: ‘So what have they done with these lies? Have they put them out there to the press?’

Editor: ‘Yes, it’s with the press, we understand’.

Gordon Thomas was nefariously used as the messenger for these lies. The Editor recalls asking him further: ‘What was the purpose of these lies?’

Gordon Thomas: ‘To make you sit up and think’.

Now, in the light of Wantagate et seq., what could this POSSIBLY mean? It was of course a threat. If you proceed along the lines of your current investigations, we will discredit you and block off your access to the press.

Far from being intimidated, the Editor chose to expose this discrediting operation in International Currency Review, the relevant issue of which sits in offices, libraries and government departments around the world, for the record.

WHY THE EDITOR IS EXPOSING THIS NOW
There are several reasons why the above matter is being exposed at this juncture. The Editor was indirectly threatened by MI6, the message being ‘cease and desist from your research into Wanta and your attempts to help him’, and ‘just for your information, we have distributed lies about you to the press so that you will never be able to access the press again’ (the Editor used to write huge Op-Ed reports for The Daily Telegraph). Gordon Thomas actually cited a case of someone to whom MI6 had earlier taken a disliking, whom they had destroyed by feeding odious information about him to one or more of the trashy newspapers. In other words, Gordon Thomas was used by MI6 to try to MAKE THE EDITOR STOP RESEARCHING WANTA. Instead of being his own man, able to make up his own mind, he allowed himself to be used for a nefarious purpose.

As is now well known, the Editor’s admittedly reckless action in paying for the Ambassador’s exit from his illegal probation in July 2005, is the precise development which triggered the events that culminated in Wantagate and which have in turn precipitated the prevailing international financial situation arising from the perverse ongoing criminality of highest-level US Government officials, all of which represent ‘unintended consequences’ arising from the Editor’s action in July 2005.

We now understand that MI6 are being, and have been, most helpful behind the scenes in certain ways towards the Ambassador and his colleagues. But the Editor would like it to be known that this was NOT PREVIOUSLY THE CASE. On the contrary, MI6 went out of its way to PREVENT THE EDITOR FROM DOING WHAT HE WOUND UP DOING IN ORDER TO ASSIST THE AMBASSADOR.

MI6 would have been aware that the Editor had visited Ambassador Wanta privately in May 2004. For the record, therefore, while one is naturally grateful that this intel organisation has finally come to its senses on this score, the historical fact is that by irresponsibly and criminally feeding empty and groundless tripe and disinformation about the Editor of this service to the British press (all of which was unfounded garbage), MI6 sought to damage this Editor’s reputation, in order to try to prevent him from attempting to assist Ambassador Wanta, whom it is now said to be helping.

It is this kind of double-mindedness, duplicity and fecklessness that has got the world into the unprecedented mess it is in, due to the mindless intelligence warfare that has been raging behind the scenes. To be frank, the Editor strongly objects to having been threatened by MI6, when later on, as a direct consequence of his intervention, they appear to be pleased with the outcome.

Not good enough.

KNEE-JERK, UNINFORMED DISINFORMATION EXPOSED
After the Editor exposed this crass MI6 stupidity in meticulous detail in our financial journal, the operation appears to have been ‘pulled’. Of course the gullible and brainwashed UK ‘mainstream media’ retained the false information and have refused the Editor all access ever since.

But now that we have a readership up to 50 times larger than that of The Daily Telegraph, it may be an appropriate time to reveal this background to a wider public – not least since a US operative using the initials applicable also to the phrase Virtual Keyboard Device may finally understand that this Editor is precisely what he says he is (see the final paragraph at the foot of each report), is not an instrument of any intelligence or other organisation, and is not an agent for a foreign power or for anyone at all. There are vague, unsourced references ‘out there’ to ‘Story and his people’: what people, exactly? We have no ‘people’.

This is an arms’-length exposure operation that needed doing: and as this Editor is the longest-serving independent editor of a financial journal in the world, it fell, unfortunately, to him, to be faced with the task of ongoing exposure of this corruption, which is the origin of Wantagate.

This digression aside, the message of the foregoing is that we must not assume that the actual payouts represent the ‘end of the matter’. The enforcement entities, Interpol and MI6, seem to be woefully inadequate for the task, and in any case are themselves internationalist organisations working for The New Underworld Order. On the contrary, as an extremely well-informed source pointed out to the Editor overnight, ‘it’s not over yet’. No, it isn’t. It is precisely when the payouts are supposed to be taking place, that the whole lot is most vulnerable to being stolen.

That may be happening. Don’t know, but keep the possibility firmly in mind, please.

THE ONGOING ‘REDEFINITION OF TERMS’ OFFENSIVE
One other point before we comment upon some valuable new leakified information about DVD, Dachau (below). For some time, there has been a concerted operation to amend definitions of terms. The coffee you are drinking at Starbucks isn’t really coffee. You think it’s coffee, but really it’s a chemical mixture that tastes like coffee. Also, the mug that you’re drinking it from isn’t really a mug. It looks like a mug, but you are a mug for thinking it’s a mug, because it’s not. It’s a container. And the Starbucks you’re sitting in isn’t really Starbucks at all. It’s a Virtual Starbucks franchise, and the owners aren’t Starbucks but rather Buck Star Limited, registered in the Cayman Islands.

The US Treasury isn’t really the US Treasury at all: it’s United States New Treasury Operations, Inc. Washington DC is a corporation. The Hotel Washington, from which I am dreamily looking out at the Treasury, isn’t that same Hotel Washington which doubles its prices during IMF/World Bank Annual Meetings weekend, and where you can get the best breakfast in town: it’s New Hotel Washington Enterprises, Inc, a proprietary CIA corporation.

The Internal Revenue Service is really a private corporation which is collecting taxes illegally and has no authority whatsoever to do so. The United States Supreme Court is a subsidiary of Model Luciferian Enterprises Incorporated, and the Congress is an operation of Capitol Hill Ventures Pty, Inc., registered in Alice Springs, Australia. The Editor of this service is really Father Christmas.

The rabbit-hole we have just entered broadens out into a Black warren of illusion like the familiar tunnel with no end, in a typical bad dream. Everything inside the rabbit warren is back to front and inside out, as Alice discovered when she walked through the looking glass.

It’s called ‘redefining of terms’. Counterintelligence obfuscation par excellence.

HOW TO HANDLE THIS OBFUSCATION OPERATION
Here’s how to deal with this offensive. Whether the Black Forces like it or not, they are stuck in the ‘real world’, as presented for public consumption, and as perceived by the general public.

Sure, they are double-minded, and live in a duplicitous parallel, virtual universe of their own crass invention. And sure, the reality as THEY perceive it is the duplicated construct that bedevils their rancid, Fascist minds. They operate on the basis of what is in THEIR minds, not ours.

And they are out of their minds, and in Lenin’s and Schicklgruber’s and Satan’s minds.

And sure, DUPLICATION HAS INDEED TAKEN PLACE and some of these false Fascist constructs exist (a huge volume of them, in fact).

• BUT IT MAKES NO PRACTICAL DIFFERENCE TO THE SITUATION.

Apologists for the ‘dupicated’, virtual Fascist world overlook this reality.

The fallacy underlying all this is that the purported fact of Fascist corporate duplication does not mean that the perceived world is not real. It simply means that the criminalists are double-minded and that it suits them, when the going gets tough, to try to persuade us that what we see is not the real world, that the organisations we think we are dealing with are not really what they seem but are something else entirely, and that the real world is their mad world of deception, intrigue, hatred, lies, double-dealing, ‘bait and switch’, stealing, murder and redefined terms. Welcome to MK-Ultra.

Sorry mate. The weakness of this Black MK-Uktra mind-controlled world is that it has to work within the ACTUAL world in which we live, and which it despises – the world in which the US Rule of Law is still purported to exist, even though the Black Forces have all but destroyed it; the real world in which Congress piles more and more legislation upon the multiple layers of legal gobbldegook that it has generated for decades, a world inhabited by a MAJORITY of awakened, thinking people and military personnel who WILL NOT PUT UP WITH THIS GARBAGE ANY LONGER and who will see to it that these criminal forces and the foreign powers manipulating them, are soon brought to justice, however long it may take.

• The ‘virtual world’ of criminalist, underworld ‘intelligence’ is constantly banging its dead head against the ceiling of the real world, and having to take its despised existence into account.

Let the Black Forces get this reality into their thick Black skulls before something really unpleasant happens to the skulls in question.

LONG-RANGE STASI/DVD OPERATIVES WORKING FOR BUSH
Now for an interesting new insight on Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD), Dachau [please see our report dated 22nd January 2008]. It surfaces on a Black (literally) CIA website, where, on 25th January, the well-known operative Tom Heneghan dropped some information which connects with something that this Editor knows about.

Some considerable time ago, the Editor was explaining to Ambassador Wanta on the transatlantic telephone line that the known STASI operative Eva Teleki is actually a DVD operative, reporting to Dachau, and that STASI was a convenient cover for the DVD (actually, under Communism, it was really the old Nazi Gestapo in Communist clothing). As the Editor has reported several times, the multitude of intelligence community eavesdroppers who were insulting us with their presence on the line on that occasion GASPED LOUDLY AND OPENLY.

There were THREE such loud gasps. Ambassador Wanta is witness to this fact. Why the gasps?

Two possibilities. Either the illegal listeners-in couldn’t believe that an ‘outsider’ had worked this out for himself. Or else, they didn’t actually know this.

Now for Tom Heneghan’s latest leak. Normally one has to take what these people leak on Agency-controlled sites with a large packet of salt. But since the Editor has background information on this matter, he believes that the leak is accurate, or ballpark.

Tom Heneghan referenced the fact that the proprietary Marvelous Investments Limited (MIL) (a corporation owned and established by Ambassador Wanta and which held/holds massive funds of which Lee Wanta remains the sole principal – Editor), is today ‘headed by a counterfeiter, check bouncer and alleged terrorist Eva Telege… Telege forged Ambassador Leo Wanta’s signature to ILLEGALLY take control of MIL while Wanta was FALSELY imprisoned in Sayre, Oklahoma, from 1997 to 1998. [Note: Ambassador Wanta was shunted around the US GULAG in part so that his mail was always delayed and rarely caught up with him, before being dumped in the hideous Wisconsin State manifestation of the Stalinist US GULAG – Editor].

Heneghan’s leak continued:

‘Telege is currently in Sweden under the protection of the corrupt Swedish Monarchy. She is wanted in France, Holland and Belgium for passing bad checks and counterfeit Euro currency.

Telege is also wanted for questioning in the 7/7 London subway bombing; in fact Scotland Yard has issued a warrant for her arrest’.

The reference to this operative being currently located in Sweden is interesting, first because another known ‘STASI’ operative, supposedly employing the dubious double-entendre name ‘Shagwell’, reportedly an opera singer of Hungarian extraction, has also been alleged to be resident in Scandinavia. One wonders whether the two are, by any chance, one and the same.

Secondly, the Sweden reference is also interesting because a huge amount of Bushfraudulent finance was directed through the Swedish Riksbank in the 1990s. Heneghan’s designation of the Swedish Monarchy as corrupt (more specifically, Sweden’s central bank) is accurate. But one should also bear firmly in mind that the corruption poison has been distributed worldwide by the Bush-linked underworld-focused George Bush Center for Global Corruption (Langley).

Now the Editor was well aware, both from documentation that he holds in safekeeping and from comments to him personally by Ambassador Wanta, that this STASI operative appeared out of the blue while he was illegally incarcerated, and that Wanta signed a document that she proffered to him in the jail, because he was ordered to do so (and implicitly had no choice, which is perfectly reasonable given his dreadful predicament at the time).

The Ambassador has also stated to the Editor that this woman has reneged on obligations towards him that arise from the document in question. The Editor is further aware that this operative stole a sum of money belonging to the Ambassador as sole principal, amounting to between $56 billion and $69 billion (the actual number being uncertain).

Heneghan deliberately spells this woman’s name incorrectly. Of Hungarian origin, her name is spelt Teleki. By spelling the name incorrectly, Heneghan may well have intended that parties would get in touch so as to correct his spelling, while divulging further relevant information at the same time: an old intelligence community trick.

EVA TELEKI THOUGHT TO HAVE BEEN THE DVD’S 7/7 PAYMEISTERIN
The Editor was also aware in 2005 that Ms. Eva Teleki was resident for the time being somewhere in London, and informed certain authorities of this fact. As usual, they took the information, didn’t say thank you and never elaborated further. When the 7/7 atrocities were staged in London, the Editor applied his lateral thinking skills to the situation and suggested to the same authorities that Teleki, being a STASI/DVD operative, may have been the paymaster behind the atrocities.

Heneghan has now revealed in his leak (and last November, as well) that Scotland Yard has issued a warrant for Eva Teleki’s arrest. Isn’t that interesting.

Uh, because that means that the British authorities know perfectly well that DVD was behind the 7/7 atrocities in London. Yet they are duplicitously continuing to cow-tow to the Germans by their facile adherence to and empty participation in the sterile, counterproductive European Union Collective, which is a long-range hegemony/control operation of the Nazi Abwehr (counterintelliegnce), a.k.a. Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst, Dachau, the perpetrators of the 7/7 atrocities.

In a related note, Tom Heneghan repeated earlier information posted on 18th November 2007 that (incorrectly spelt) agent Telege is ‘a Bush-Clinton Crime Family Syndicate fixer [who] takes orders from daddy Bush, (CIA operative), Mrs Hillary Clinton and the illegally pardoned fugitive Marc Rich’.

Heneghan also displayed a photograph captioned ‘Bush-Clinton Crime Syndicate bagman East German DVD agent and Israeli Mossad agent fugitive Zionist Marc Rich’.

• FACT: On pages 83-96 and also on page 269 of International Currency Review, Volume 31,#s 3 &4 [Fourth Quarter 2006] the Editor proved, from documents, that Marc Rich may in fact be a long-term deep-cover Deutsche Vertieidigungs Dienst (DVD), Dachau, operative born on 4th June 1934, who emigrated from Lelbach/Waldeck uber Korbach, Germany, to Canada in 1954, and later received his Certificate of Canadian Citizenship #898013 in March 1966 under his real name, Hans Brand.

• FACT: Tom Heneghan now confirms on a CIA-owned website that Marc Rich is a DVD operative.

Heneghan’s report dated 18th November stated that ‘as far as Ms. Eva Telege is concerned, a European RED INTERPOL NOTICE has been issued for her arrest. The RED NOTICE mentions Telege as a suspect in the London subway bombing on 7/7 [2005]. Eva Telege is also wanted in France and Switzerland for passing bad checks…’.

‘If that is not enough, Ms Telege forged documents in order to ILLEGALLY transfer Power of Attorney for Marvelous Investments Ltd from Ambassador Leo Wanta to Ms. Telege’.

In his leak dated 25th January 2008, Heneghan, referencing a huge secret bank account allegedly held by the Clintons in the Cayman Islands, stated in his usual colourful language:

‘Romney [is a] business partner with Daddy Bush. This dovetails to our previous intelligence briefing linking Romney, Hillary Clinton, former President Herbert Walker Bush and John Kerry Cohen (Bushfraud’s third cousin)… all [of whom] are sitting on the Board of Directors of a CIA proprietary corporation called Marvelous Investments Ltd (MIL) [repeat: originally set up by Wanta, and of which he remains the sole owner and principal both of the corporation and of its assets to this day – Editor of this service).

No wonder the balloon went up when Ambassador Wanta ‘ceased to be dead’ after the Editor’s private funds of $35,000 (which should have been paid back to him with 7% annual interest by Escrow Trustee Attorney Steven Goodwin in June 2007, but haven’t been) procured the ending of Lee Emil Wanta’s illegal probationary confinement effective 14th November, five years earlier than stipulated. The Ambassador’s probation would otherwise have ended on 28th November 2010.

And the background of Hillary Clinton’s little visit in the 1990s to Crozier Bank in Grenada, which suddenly found itself with a ‘Black hole’ not unadjacent to $500 million, has still to be related. While Mrs Rodomski Clinton was in the bank, the institution’s video surveillance cameras miraculously failed. The stolen funds have not been declared for tax purposes. Er, no, we imagine not.

On page 358 of International Currency Review, Volume 31, #s 3 & 4, we displayed a letter that had been made available to us, dated 17th December 1998 re Marvelous Investments Limited, from Bank Crozier which states:

‘Please be advised that you currently have a balance of Five Hundred Million United States Dollars ($500,000,000) in your account designated for the purchase of Medium-term Notes’.

Let the unravelling continue. And believe this independent Editor: IT WILL

NOTHING LESS THAN ECONOMIC RECEIPT IS ACCEPTABLE
Oh, and by the way: Michael C. Cottrell M.S. and the Ambassador require ECONOMIC RECEIPT of the funds overdue to them, plus interest.

Economic receipt is the only basis of payment that is or can be acceptable, and the only basis upon which US taxes are payable. Economic receipt is ‘real world’ receipt, not ‘virtual’ i.e. ‘constructive’ receipt. Period. The Ambassador has NOT so far taken economic receipt; and since the funds that are supposed to be being paid out belong to the Ambassador in the first place, no other party can be paid until such time as the Ambassador’s hijacked ‘compromise’ $4.5 trillion has been remitted from the US criminal enterprise called Citibank to the corporate securities account of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. within Morgan Stanley, and Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. has taken economic receipt of it. Whether the Tier One ‘countries’ have actually been paid cannot be confirmed, either.

Suggestions made to us on 24th January that key Tier One Trustees had been or were being paid, which we carefully contrasted in the preceding report with the verified FACT that the Ambassador had NOT been paid, have not been supported since by further reliable information from ANY of our multiple sources to that effect. Their purpose, as with earlier blanishments, appears to have been to OBFUSCATE the reality, reiterated below, that no-one gets paid a red cent until the Ambassador has been paid, because Wanta retains his claim on the funds that belong to him. Period.

The possibility is that reports of payments may have been false. There were also suggestions that the payouts started, were then stopped at 2.00pm on Friday 25th January, and then started up again at 4.00pm that day. None of these suggestions have been capable of reliable confirmation. The only FACT that is verified is that the Ambassador has NOT been paid. We rely upon that FACT.

Until the Ambassador is paid, has taken economic receipt and has accordingly thereby relinquished his ongoing recognised and wholly legitimate claim to his underlying $27.5 trillion, and to the entire layered edifice of illegally accrued fiat money funds illegally generated through multiple leveraging upon the back of his stolen/diverted funds, NO-ONE ELSE CAN RECEIVE A SINGLE RED CENT.

• AND THE SOONER THIS BASIC FACT IS REVISITED, THE BETTER.

This alone supports the argument contained in this Update report that the criminals have attacked, may be attacking or intend to attack the armoured vehicle that has arrived at the high street bank branch and is supposedly transferring the funds. ENDS

CITIBANK MUST PAY $350 BILLION+ INTEREST UNDER U.C.C. REGULATIONS
Uniform Commercial Code: Article 4A – Funds Transfer: Section 4A-305:
LIABILITY FOR LATE OR IMPROPER EXECUTION OR FAILURE TO EXECUTE PAYMENT ORDER:

(a) If a funds transfer is completed but execution of a payment order by the receiving bank… results in delay in payment to the beneficiary, the bank is obliged to pay interest… to the beneficiary of the funds transfer for the period of delay caused by the improper execution.

As stated in our report dated 4th October, we then calculated that the amount of interest payable to the beneficiary by Citibank, given its delay in paying out the diverted funds since June 2006, was around $350 billion. This amount is rising BY THE DAY, and is now approaching $400 billion.

• [As we revealed at the time] Citibank ‘agreed’ to pay $352 billion by way of interest, following our publication of the above statements. However, the Editor, not being a banker, merely made a rough guestimate at the amount of interest payable by Citibank, consequent upon its criminal frustration and diversion of the Settlement funds since June 2006.

• The actual amount of interest payable by Citibank as an interest penalty, if calculated on the basis of overnight rates, might approximate well over $1.0 trillion. So the institution, having been made aware of our posting dated 1st November, grabbed the Editor’s rough estimate of $350 billion, and added a couple of billion on to make the figure look different. ENDS.

YOU CAN ORDER WANTAGATE ISSUES OF OUR FINANCIAL JOURNAL AS A PACKAGE
We sell, as a special package, the relevant recent back issues of International Currency Review, containing a massive amount of information and back-up documentation, for a flat fee of $750.00, payable in advance. Please use the CONTACT US facility to place your order and send check to the London office: World Reports Limited, 108 Horseferry Road, Westminster, London SW1P 2EF, United Kingdom. Orders may also be emailed direct to the Editor at: cstory@worldreports.org.

• Another way of ordering this package is to (a) forward us a CONTACT US email requesting the package, and then (b) to order International Currency Review via the ultra-safe ordering facility at the World Reports Limited section of this website.

• Please state in the CONTACT US facility that you have ordered International Currency Review but that you specifically want to receive the Wantagate package only.

• Editor’s Note: We are still, from time to time, receiving emails from frustrated people seeking documentation to ‘back up’ what we publish in these reports. Such correspondents choose to overlook the well-known fact that we have published several huge issues of International Currency Review [SEE ABOVE] which contain hundreds of pages of facsimiles of relevant documents. Since we are a commercial operation, we cannot make these volumes available free of charge.

• However copies are available in many university and other libraries around the world, and of course they can be ordered via this website at any time. But the main point here is that complaints along these lines reveal lack of knowledge of the background, which is that an immense volume of relevant documents has been published in our printed intelligence services.

LEGAL SECTION:
PLEASE READ THIS INFORMATION, AS IT INDICATES THE DEPTH OF THE DEPRAVITY THAT WANTAGATE HAS EXPOSED. REPETITION OF THIS BASIC DATA IS STILL NECESSARY…

• We now repeat, yet again, our familiar summary of the Statutes, securities regulations and fraud information that we have appended to these reports for many months. The reason we append this information is to remind everyone of their clear responsibilities under the US Misprision of Felony legislation, and of course to provide a legal basis for these reports.

LEGAL RECAPITULATION FROM REPORT DATED 30TH AUGUST 2007:
Reiteration of the fraudulent transactions involving Bank of New York Mellon – a bank so arrogant and conspicuously indifferent both to its tarnished reputation and to its grotesque breaches of US law and of N.A.S.D./S.E.C. Regulations, that it now takes first prize in the crowded competition for the title of ‘Most arrogant and corrupt financial institution in America’. At least, this was the case until the perpetration of the ‘Saturday scam’ described above and on 13th November:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• ‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON IS IN BREACH AND OF WHICH THE SIX ‘LEVY BANKS’ MAY LIKEWISE BE VARIOUSLY IN BREACH [CREDIT SUISSE, UBS, DEUTSCHE BANK, BANK OF AMERICA, CITIBANK, THE BANK OF ENGLAND]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is in violation of:
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR SIR LEO WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT THE HIGHEST U.S. LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006, AND HAVE CONTINUED THEIR SERIAL CRIMES EVER SINCE:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war

This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Wanta’s funds.

The Directors and others listed in Part 1 of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and others posted on 11th June may likewise be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious violation of the laws itemised above. This list is reproduced in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, September 2007, on pages 163-168.

U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: MISPRISION OF FELONY:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

Wicked Pedia Update dated 2nd December 2007:

WIKIPEDIA IS PART OF AN NSA DISCREDITING OPERATION
As previously reported, the Editor’s attention was drawn, in the second half of November 2007, to a pack of old lies, diversionary claptrap and disinformation posted on Wikipedia under ‘Leo Wanta’.

Although this posting appeared FOR THE FIRST TIME on 12th November 2007, it consisted almost entirely of ancient lies, including disinformation dredged out of ‘Thieves’ World’, a hatchet job published in 1994 by Simon and Schuster by the late Claire Sterling, a CIA operative.

Mrs Sterling died suddenly after being summoned for her second meeting with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, under Clinton.

ANCIENT DISCREDITED LIES POSTED IN NOVEMBER 2007
The fact that the OLD Wikipedia lies appeared for the first time as late as 12th November 2007, and consisted almost totally of old, discredited lies, omitting the Master Lie that the CIA retailed after the Ambassador had been taken down, namely that he was DEAD, indicated quite clearly to the Editor and his advisers that this latest evil display of regurgitated disinformation represented a deliberate operation by the US intelligence community’s disinformation and lie machine, to begin, all over again, the process of discrediting Ambassador Leo Wanta – so that they can relieve him of his funds by some false pretext or other after a ‘gag order’ has been signed.

The definitive up-to-date information on the Ambassador’s affairs has been published on this website, and in several issues of International Currency Review, Economic Intelligence Review, Soviet Analyst and Arab-Asian Affairs, all published by World Reports Limited, for several years. Copies of these publications are in official, institutional and library hands all over the world. Therefore, any posting about Ambassador Wanta that relies upon ancient lies and fails to take account of the accurate information that we have published, can easily be demonstrated to represent yet another US intelligence community and NSA discrediting operation.

PRELUDE TO ‘SETTING UP’ WANTA ALL OVER AGAIN
We now understand that the Principals have been advised (for the past several weeks) that they will not be allowed to reveal that they have been paid. This loony state of affairs is designed to ‘set them up’ for a future discrediting operation whereby false witness will be deployed against them to the effect that they have stolen the money, or some such pack of lies, which they will be unable to refute because they will be bound by the ‘prerequisite’ gag order that is intended. Its purpose, of course, is to ‘legitimise’ the old and new lies that the US disinformation apparat will be preparing for future use. The likelihood is that the new discrediting operation will be extended to Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., as well. We are prepared for this intended onslaught.

EDITOR’S TRUE REPORT REPEATEDLY REPLACED BY OLD LIES
On 19th November, the Editor posted on Wikipedia the accurate text about Leo Wanta that is now reproduced below. The Editor’s accurate text was then removed by Wikipedia, leaving the ‘old lies’ that had existed previously. When the Editor became aware of this, he reposted the accurate text below, and, given that his own copy had been deleted, he then deleted the pack of lies, leaving his own accurate text up on the Wikipedia site instead, without the lies.

On 2nd December, the Editor was advised by a monitor that the Editor’s accurate text had been removed and that the old discrediting lies had been reposted on the page by Wikipedia. When the Editor checked, he found that the page could no longer be edited because of what the site managers described as ‘vandalism’.

IT’S ‘VANDALISM’ TO POST THE TRUTH, NOT ‘VANDALISM’ TO POST LIES
It was not ‘vandalism’ to delete the truth and to replace the truth by old lies, but it was ‘vandalism’ to delete ‘old lies’ and replace them by the truth.

We are therefore able to conclude from this Wicked Pedia outrage, as follows:

1. Wikipedia, which purports to ‘change the world’, prefers lies to the truth.

2. Wikipedia is therefore, by definition, a source of disinformation and lies, and cannot be trusted as a source of reliable information in any context.

3. The only category of sick society that would have any interest in disseminating lies about Ambassador Wanta, the United States’ greatest living patriot, rather than the truth, is the mentally disturbed US counterintelligence disinformation apparat (a.k.a. the US STUPIDITY COMMUNITY) which, by its actions in deleting the Editor’s ACCURATE information and replacing it with old lies, and by its illegal behaviour in ‘snipping’ our website texts as stated above, thereby reveals the desperation of its concerns, which all have to do with covering up official criminality.

4. It is now far too late for the US stupidity community to repair the damage that it has done since June 2006, when the Ambassador’s funds were first hijacked by the criminal financial operative Henry M. Paulson, US Treasury Secretary. So it is laying the groundwork for a renewed discrediting operation against Ambassador Wanta and his colleagues.

• We and others will see to it that this intention is defeated, and that such nefarious scheming is exposed for the amoral and disgusting Luciferian behaviour that it represents.

The ACCURATE text that the Editor posted on the Wikipedia site, follows. (The Editor, after all, PAID FOR AMBASSADOR WANTA’S EXIT FROM PROBATION, FOR GOODNESS SAKE, SO HE CAN HARDLY BE A SOURCE OF DISINFORMATION, CAN HE?). This information will be very widely distributed by other means, in order to provide all concerned with the necessary ‘heads-up’ as to what these US Dark Forces have in mind. They are out of their minds and in Satan’s mind:

The disinformation about Leo Wanta (Lee Wanta) below was first posted on 12th November 2007. It contains ancient CIA disinformation and long since exposed lies going back to the early 1990s, and obfuscates the truth. The report appended immediately below was added on 19th November 2007, to correct the disinformation contained in the original stub.

It was subsequently removed and is hereby replaced. This sequence of events, which suggests that egregious lies are preferred to the truth, has been recorded on www.worldreports.org, which contains all the updated and breaking Wanta material, that was ignored and traduced in the stub at the foot of this report.

THE ACCURATE TEXT THAT WIKIPEDIA REPEATEDLY DELETED
This is the correct information that we posted on 19th November 2007:

The ‘information’ posted below represents a deliberately malevolent, false disinformation picture which has no bearing on reality. It is a travesty of the truth of the matter and cites Christopher Story as the author of some of the disinformation, which is libellous and implies that Story, the veteran
Editor of International Currency Review of nearly 40 years’ standing, is engaged in the egregious dissemination of lies, which is not the case.

This is such an egregiously malevolent stub of disinformation that readers should prudently dismiss it altogether; they should start afresh by accessing Christopher Story‘s website, which is: www.worldreports.org., reading from the Archive.

www.worldreports.org is the authoritative source for all updated information on Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta. The source ‘Thieves’ World’ was a CIA disinformation work prepared by the late CIA disinformation operative Claire Sterling, published in 1994.

This stub regurgitates ancient lies perpetrated by the CIA, which lied for many years that Lee (Leo being his intelligence community name) Wanta was dead. The CIA proclaimed that he was dead so that corrupt cadres could ransack his funds (see below).

He ‘ceased to be dead’ with effect from 21st July 2005 after Christopher Story, a British private citizen, had paid $35,000 from his scarce private funds pro bono publico by way of ‘restitution’ to an American lawyer for onward payment to the Wisconsin State Department of Corrections, to procure Mr Wanta’s release from his illegal probation.

Despite his Ambassadorial status, Wanta had been illegally ‘taken down’ in Switzerland on 7th July 1993 without a warrant on a trumped-up Wisconsin State charge of having failed to pay $14,129 in falsely assessed Wisconsin State fabricated tax that he never owed because he had been resident in Vienna on US Presidential intelligence work since June 1988.

This data is all in the public domain, has been published for several years in International Currency Review, the Journal of the World Financial Community, and can be read on Mr Story’s website.

International Currency Review is a banking and financial journal with a worldwide circulation: ISSN 0020-6490. It is published by World Reports Limited, London.

Notwithstanding that this fabricated tax demand (orchestrated by US criminal intelligence) had been paid twice under protest by Lee Emil Wanta from abroad (in May and June 1992), the funds were improperly allocated by the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue and were never credited to the false account maintained by them for the Ambassador. (Christopher Story holds documentary
proof of both payments). They were paid a third time by Christopher Story in June 2005, which action duly procured Mr Wanta’s release from illegal probation effective 14th November 2005.

As a consequence of Wanta thus ceasing to be dead, the CIA’s lie that he was dead collapsed in chaos, and all the subsidiary old false witness lies that the CIA had perpetrated, including those assembled for disinformation purposes in the stub below (which, in line with the standard false witness used throughout by detractors, attempts to portray Christopher Story as a source of disinformation) were discredited as well.

Why was Wanta taken down? So that the criminal intelligence cadres running the US Government could ransack the $27.5 trillion of funds assembled by Leo Wanta on President Reagan’s orders, in the course of his Financial Warfare operations against the USSR.

Under Reagan’s Executive Order 12333 of 1981, US intelligence officers were permitted to establish corporations which could thereafter contract with the CIA/DIA/DEA/NSA et al for the purpose of fulfilling allotted intelligence tasks allocated to them.

The financial proceeds of operations conducted by such corporations were consequently the property of the corporations and thus of their shareholders, a legal fact of life which has never been, and cannot be, disputed. This was not a good idea because almost all US intelligence
operatives are liars and do not function on the basis of the Rule of Law at all, if they can help it.

Lee Wanta is the well-known patriotic exception to this rule: he operates solely in accordance with US law, in contrast to the behaviour of other US operatives, which is why the kakocracy* needed to remove him from the scene, as duly occurred July 1993.

Once Wanta had been illegally arrested (contrary to international law, as a diplomat) and then thrown into a stinking Swiss jail on 7th July 1993, the criminal cadres inside the US official structures immediately ransacked Mr Wanta’s bank accounts according to plan.

The history of this matter is, and has been, elaborated in great depth on Christopher Story‘s website www.worldreports.org. and has been extensively published, as mentioned, in International Currency Review and other World Reports Limited intelligence publications.

Students are advised perhaps to begin with the ‘Wisconsingate’ report dated 6th August 2007, which forensically dissects, with detailed documentary back-up, the Wisconsin Department of Revenue’s tax fabrication operation against Wanta, stretching back for over 20 years, that has been exposed by Christopher Story in minute detail, and which formed the fabricated basis for Wanta’s illegal takedown in 1993, despite the fact that Wisconsin has no jurisdiction beyond its borders.

The overall Wantagate crisis, which is the sole and continuing underlying cause of the prevailing global financial and economic day of reckoning that the world is now facing, has been triggered by the fact that the George W. Bush Jr. White House, aided and abetted by other senior office-holders, hijacked the compromise financial settlement of $4.5 trillion that the White House itself agreed (in a classified accord that was finalised in May 2006) should be paid over to Ambassador Wanta, so that the stolen and diverted remaining $23 trillion of his funds (and the many hundreds of trillions of dollars hypothecated upon them) could be released from a de facto lien arising from the collapse of the CIA’s lie that Wanta was dead.

For clearly, since he had ceased to be dead, 100% of these funds (plus the hundreds of trillions of fiat ‘funny’ money generated by illegal leveraged operations from that base) belonged to Lee Wanta and to no-one else: a situation that the banks ‘could not handle’.

The entire narrative of what has become the worst financial corruption crisis in world history (which this stub consisting of disinformation attempts to obfuscate) is set out in great detail on Christopher Story‘s website www.worldreports.org., to which all readers are directed in order for the accurate state of affairs to be understood. As indicated, this stub below is a travesty and a disgrace, as it regurgitates long since discredited CIA lies, presents a diversionary, distorted and misleading picture, and because it malevolently incorporates Christopher Story as a source for some of this disinformation.

It is a disgusting instance of ignorant and malevolent US counterintelligence disinformation and deceit at its very worst.

All the statements in the above commentary may be verified by reference to www.worldreports.org and International Currency Review. Another publication covering this matter in detail is Economic Intelligence Review, also published by World Reports Limited, London. Wanta students should access the Archive on the www.worldreports.org Home Page.

A book devoted to Ambassador Wanta and the Wantagate crisis is in preparation

The Wanta disinformation referred to above has been deleted from this page. ENDS.

DIPLOMATIC STATUS OF THE PRINCIPALS
The Ambassador and his colleagues now have special diplomatic status (conferred upon them by HM The Queen in 2007), which means that the Ambassador is now an Ambassador several times over. This factor greatly complicates the intended discrediting offensive that the mad US stupidity community’s Dark Forces contemplate, their sole objective being of course to cover up their own criminality, in line with pending ‘thought crime’ legislation which has the same Nazi-style objective.

*Note: ‘Kakocracy’: Governance by a clique representing the worst elements of society, in their interests and to the exclusion of all other interests, from the Greek, kakos, meaning foul, or filthy.

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier Wantagate reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

LEE WANTA’S SETTLEMENT IS NOW 18 MONTHS++ OVERDUE

WORLD COURT ORDERS PARIBAS TO RELEASE OR BE SEIZED

Friday 25 January 2008 02:18

LAST-MINUTE BUSH-SARKOZY TRADES WERE REPORTEDLY THWARTED

MARKET TURBULENCE HAS BEEN EXCLUSIVELY TIED TO THE SETTLEMENTS

• ‘MAINSTREAM MEDIA’ PUNDITS, ANALYSTS, FLOUNDER IN EMPTY VERBIAGE:

• HAVING IGNORED WANTAGATE, THEY HAVE HAD NO CLUE WHAT’S BEEN HAPPENING

WORLD REMAINS ON A KNIFE EDGE: IF ONE BANK GOES, ALL BANKS FACE COLLAPSE

CRISIS TRIGGERED BY RAMPANT CORRUPTION AT THE HIGHEST U.S. LEVEL

• IF WANTA HAD BEEN PAID IN JUNE 2006, THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO CRISIS:

• SEE OUR REPORTS DATED 02 SEPTEMBER 2006, 18 & 27 JULY AND 08 SEPTEMBER 2007

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for ‘Wantagate’ reports since April 2006. [Note: A new panel giving details of our latest publications as they are made available, has been added].

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing financial global corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Wantagate reports been calling all the shots, given the hijacking of Wanta’s Settlement. This is the 90th Wantagate report: over a million+++ words to date.

CONTRAST BETWEEN CURRENT ‘RELEASE’ ASSERTIONS, AND WHAT WE KNOW
In the past few days, the impression has been fostered that the cascade of financial settlements, beginning with the G-8/G-10 (= First Tier) country recipients, finally began after the World Court ordered Paribas on 24th January to start releasing funds to the attorney for a key US Trustee (see below), and the World Court likewise made it plain to the US Supreme Court that relevant releases of funds must take place on 25th January and subsequently.

There was some unconfirmed indication that funds had started to be paid out, and that huge sums of money were being moved in accordance with known settlement requirements; but this Editor asserts, to the best of his information and belief, that there has been ZERO indication whatsoever that the funds that were stolen and illegally diverted from the Ambassador in June 2006 and ever since, have been remitted by Citibank to Lee Wanta’s corporate securities account with Morgan Stanley, New York, in accordance with the long outstanding Treasury Direct instruction, as of this date. Obviously, we can only report the situation as it stands at the time of reporting.

The transfer of these ‘stand-alone’ funds, which technically have nothing whatsoever to do with any other settlement, takes 20 seconds to effect and is more than 18 months overdue.

Therefore, the open-ended securities fraud and other gross felonies that we have catalogued in successive reports in this Wantagate series for the past 18 months, have never ceased; and they would appear to be continuing with no respite, to this day.

THE EDITOR’S STANDING AND THE TRIGGER FOR THE CRISIS
Various unofficial assurances of imminent payment have been transmitted to the Editor of this service; but he operates necessarily at arms’ length from the Principals, is not a party to any of their private business transactions, is not a payee in respect any of the settlements addressed in these reports, and has no connection with these matters other than as a private reporter of the biggest financial corruption crisis in world history, and as a person of standing in that he provided $35,000 out of his scarce private savings in July 2005 to buy the end of the Ambassador’s illegal probation, pro bono publico as a remote friend of the Ambassador, and for no other reason.

Those funds were then fraudulently conveyed by the Wisconsin Department of Revenue, although the Wisconsin Department of Corrections terminated Wanta’s illegal probation five years earlier than would otherwise have occurred: see our report [Archive] dated 6th August 2007 for details.

As a consequence of that payment, the Ambassador, whom the CIA had cruelly represented to be dead, ‘ceased to be dead’, causing reverberating shock and horror among corrupt elements of the international financial community, the corrupted banks that had all complacently assumed that the Ambassador’s funds could be used for their own purposes (since he was ‘dead’), the hyper-corrupt Central Intelligence Agency (= the George Bush Center for Global Corruption) and the specialists in fraudulent finance occupying the highest levels of the US Government.

These shocks and their consequences coalesced to bring about the reverse of what Ambassador Wanta had intended – namely, the worst financial crisis that humanity has ever faced: and the SOLE reason for this hazardous geofinancial instability is that the corrupt holders of the highest offices in the United States signalled to the world, by their serial criminal behaviour, that open-ended off-balance sheet, untaxed trading operations with stolen money would henceforth be considered the norm. In other words, the vicious environment of ‘anomie’ identified by Emile Dirkheim, whereby universal criminality is the ‘norm’ and the Rule of Law is aberrant, was given the presidential green light – the more so, if that is possible, under the Presidency of George W. Bush Jr. even than was the case during the corrupt Presidencies of the serial criminal William Jefferson Clinton and his predecessor and protector, Godfather George H. W. Bush Sr.

THE BASIC FACTS AS THEY STAND TODAY
As of the date and time of this posting and as reported to us at 3.10pm EST on 25th January:

• The $4.5 trillion funds belonging to Ambassador Wanta that have been illegally and fraudulently withheld from him ever since June 2006 had not been remitted to Ambassador Lee Wanta’s Morgan Stanley corporate account. The additional $352++ billion penalty interest payable by Citibank under Article 4A-305 of the Universal Commercial Code [see below] must be added on to the payment in accordance with the special 60-day terms arranged last fall.

• No communication with the Ambassador and/or his colleagues indicating that the long delayed payment is to be made or has been made, had been received.

• The offending financial institutions remain in gross breach of securities regulations and statutes routinely listed at the foot of all these reports; and since the corruption and illegal retention of the Ambassador’s $4.5 trillion++ represent innumerable, repeated ultra vires actions, the legal status of the institutions concerned remains dubious, while the institutions themselves remain vulnerable to action for massive damages. Although the Principals are supposed to ‘walk away’ from their injuries after Mr Wanta’s Settlement, the longer this scandalous state of affairs continues, the less inclined they may well be, to comply with that fundamentally corrupt ‘requirement’, we guess. See our report on the fraudulent finance underlying the so-called ‘sub-prime’ crisis, dated 26th December 2007.

• President George W. Bush Jr, Vice President Richard Cheney and the remaining and surviving criminal operatives clinging onto power by their dirty fingernails, continue to preside over corrupt financial operations on a scale without precedent, with Mr George W. Bush Jr. having crammed two centuries of white collar crime into his decadent and shameless Presidency. There are suggestions that these operatives’ hands have been tied, and that may be true: but since the Ambassador has not taken receipt of his funds, and there have been anecdotal reports to the effect that President Bush intervened to dislocate mandatory World Court-ordered transactions as late as 25th January, we doubt that the chains round his hands have been fastened tightly enough.

COMPARE THE ABOVE FACTUAL INFORMATION WITH WHAT FOLLOWS
Now, contrast the accurate statements summarised in general terms above, with what the Editor was being told late in the evening British time on 25th January 2008; and recall, too, that the Editor of International Currency Review is not a party to anything and therefore doesn’t need to be told any of this, given that the Principals have been told nothing and cannot confirm any of it:

• The G-8/G-10 country recipients were paid following the release of funds on 24th January (by order of the World Court) from Paribas, after illegal transactions between Presidents Bush Jr. and Sarkozy had been thwarted or stopped [see also below].

• Trustees were paying out funds, one US Trustee moved a huge amount of money on 25th January, and everything was honky (hunky?) dory and in good order.

• The released funds are locked and cannot be traded over the weekend, in accordance with the usual corrupt practice whereby the banks and their associates typically manufacture fresh accruals overnight by illegally prolonging their retention of other people’s money and stolen funds.

• Ambassador Wanta’s funds are safe, locked and will be made available to him for use on Monday. ISN’T THAT JUST GREAT? Questions: Why is the Editor of this service being told all this, and not the Principals themselves? Why were the funds belonging to Ambassador Wanta not made available to him in June 2006, and why was the US Treasury Direct instruction for the funds to be remitted to the Ambassador’s corporate securities account held with Morgan Stanley, not implemented by Citibank when it should have been, in breach both of the securities regulations listed below and, not least, of Article 4A-305 of the Universal Commercial Code?

• Why is it implied that the Ambassador and his colleagues should now be grateful for the promised remittance, when (a) no undertakings given by any US party have any meaning given the history of this matter; (b) undertakings are given not to the Principals but to a British reporter who is resident 4,000 miles away and has nothing whatsoever to do with these transactions other than in pursuit of his reporting responsibility to our readers; and (c) the Principals have been fed such ‘information’ ten zillion times already?

• Sources confirm that ‘things are moving’, but nothing will be ‘factual’ until the Principals have taken economic receipt of their funds, which was NOT the case at this posting.

• ‘There is a gag order’: Excuse us, please? How can a ‘gag order’ apply when we are dealing with serious, continuing gross securities fraud, repeated ongoing stealing and exploitation of usurped monies, the realities that the Supreme Court of the United States has been an accessory to the fact of these crimes, and that the ongoing crimes were directed and sanctioned by both the President and the Vice President of the United States – the two most corrupt holders of these high offices in American history? A gag order cannot be applied to the covering up of criminal acts.

When we pressed one source for an explanation as to why the Principals had not been told about the disposition of their funds, we were told: ‘Because too many ears are listening’. However it is a FACT that every single telephone conversation between Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. and other parties, including this benighted Editor, is listened to intently by Mossad, DVD, Munich, NSA, GCHQ, French intelligence, the KGB’s eavesdropping service, Chinese intelligence and the Man in the Moon.

So what’s new?

What is NOT NEW is that:

• The Ambassador has not received the funds that were stolen from him 18 months ago.

• The elaborate and detailed ‘information’ conveyed to the Editor of this service has not been conveyed to the Ambassador and his colleagues. WHY IS THAT?

• Accordingly, the ONLY FACTS that we can verify are as follows:

1. The Ambassador has not received his stolen funds. No-one has notified the Principals that the AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. corporate securities account with Morgan Stanley has received the funds belonging to Ambassador Wanta in accordance with the long-standing Treasury Direct instructions.

2. The criminal intel cadres, institutions, holders of high office, fraudulent finance specialists and assorted intelligence community sheisters who have collectively brought the whole world to the brink of a financial and economic catastrophe that would make 1929 seem like a skiing holiday in Davos, have continued with their securities and other financial frauds, i.e. business as usual.

• REMEMBER:

• The ‘Full Faith and Credit of the United States’ has long since been destroyed as a direct consequence of these serial financial frauds and thefts.

• The financial institutions concerned are STILL committing ultra vires actions which is reason enough in US law for their entire business operations to be in jeopardy, not least since all their business transactions since the commission of the first ultra vires action (if the legal reality is taken to its logical conclusion) render all their subsequent transactions of questionable validity.

• No undertaking today by any US office-holder, Supreme Court Justice, banker, securities house official, intelligence officer, or other interested party can be relied upon, in the light of the open-ended and UNCORRECTED corruption and thefts perpetrated by the parties concerned and named or listed in these lugubrious reports.

• The reputation of the United States for business integrity stinks in the nostrils of the Rest of the World as a consequence of Wantagate, and is s(t)inking further and further into the mire every day that the Wanta remittance is criminally withheld and brazenly exploited by others.

• There is not an icicle’s chance in Hades of any recovery for the United States until the funds belonging to Ambassador Wanta that were stolen/diverted in June 2006 are restored to him, and with appropriate compensation. On the basis of the Editor’s crude layman’s calculation, this should now exceed $450 billion, payable by Citibank under the Universal Commercial Code regulations; but if calculated on the proper basis of compounded overnight interest rates, the amount payable by Citibank, to be added to Mr Wanta’s stolen $4.5 trillion, should by now be approaching $2.0 trillion.

SUMMARY OF THE SITUATION PREVAILING ON 26TH JANUARY 2008
The rest of this report was ready for publication early in the morning of 25th January, but was delayed pending clarifications that never materialised. Before proceeding with it, we add the following considerations:

• Assertions that Tier One country recipients and Trustee payees have been paid could not be confirmed and were not reconcilable with, or accompanied by, any indications whatsoever that the Ambassador, who should be paid first, has been paid. The Principals have received no notification whatsoever to that effect.

• The possibility must therefore exist that massive fraud is taking place ‘as we speak’ and that the Ambassador remains a victim of this fraud.

• The best thing that could happen to the world on Monday is that President George W. Bush Jr. and his criminal MK-Ultra handler-controller Vice President Cheney, announce their resignations.

• The Editor hates to have to agree with the Hungarian operative George Soros, but he is correct in stating that the world faces the worst financial and economic crisis in human history. What Mr Soros has of course omitted to elaborate is that this horrendous crisis has been brought about as a direct and exclusive consequence of the perverse, ongoing, ruthless, endless corruption of these American elected officials and their criminal collaborators, including the Clintons, who are their key associated operatives and co-conspiring perpetrators of High Crimes and Misdemeanours.

• The ONLY way out of the crisis is to implement/complete the Wanta Settlement and the various settlements that have been lined up with it (even though the Ambassador’s own funds should have been paid over to him on a stand-alone basis in June 2006, and should never have been held up). The resulting refinancing will rescue the world financial economy, but at the price of very rapidly accelerating inflation. The whole matter has been handled in the worst possible manner. On the other hand, had it not been for Wantagate, global awareness of the extent of the corruption would never have reached the proportions evident today: so this has to be counted as a ‘benefit’.

As we pointed out in June 2006 and ad nauseam subsequently, if the Lee Wanta payment had been remitted back then as it should have been, the economic and financial position and prospects for the United States would by now have been massively transformed – as we further explained in our reports dated 2nd September 2006, 18th and 27th July 2007, and 8th September 2007.

Instead of which, the Ambassador’s funds were illegally seized in order to maximise the potential for fraudulent finance operations, on top of the misappropriation and the illegal exploitation of the Ambassador’s $27.5 trillion (of which he remains the sole principal to this day) and the duplicated $27.5 trillion raised from 200+ banks in 1992 using Wanta’s $27.5 trillion as collateral.

Given this state of affairs, may we politely remind the US military that every American officer swore to uphold and defend the Constitution against all enemies, domestic and foreign? Or would that reminder fall on deaf ears also?

The foregoing does not represent ‘interference’ in the internal affairs of the United States, because this is an INTERNATIONAL CRISIS driven by the organised criminal cadres that have hijacked the American Government. If it were purely a national crisis, no doubt such a comment might be considered inappropriate, coming from a mere Brit. But this crisis affects the future of the whole world. As HM The Queen reminded the Group of Eight Meeting held in Germany last June, the Wanta Settlement needs to be completed ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’.

The original text of this report, which was to have been posted overnight 24th/25th January, now follows. It was delayed while we waited to see whether the Wanta payment would materialise:

THE EVENTS OF 23RD AND 24TH JANUARY 2008
On 23rd January, an ostensible trigger for Lee Wanta’s Settlement and the multiple settlements – the French lawyer for a key US Trustee – was standing by for funds to be released for his client from Paribas in the French capital, this being a primary ‘lever’ that needed to be ‘pulled’ for the multiple settlement releases to the ‘country recipients’, including the Group of Eight and the G-10 countries, to be paid. A banker equipped with the necessary powers to achieve this was to have attended at Paribas for that purpose, but failed to show up.

Given the ‘never-pay’ model designed intentionally by Godfather George Bush Sr. and his arch-crook henchman Greenspan, whereby remittances overdue to the payees, financial scam victims, investors and other recipients in the layered tiers below the top ‘country’ tier of official payees, could ‘always’ be frustrated by means of sabotaging one transaction and thereby destabilising all the intentionally ‘related’ payees and tiers, it followed that the Paribas remittance(s), the Citibank payment of Ambassador Wanta’s stolen/diverted $4.5 trillion – plus $352+ billion of agreed interest payable to Wanta by Citibank under Uniform Commercial Code Article 4A-305 (Liability for Late or Improper Execution or Failure to Execute Payment Order) – and finally the multiple payments to be executed by Bank of America (the United States’ apparent central bank-to-be) were thereby once again frustrated because of highest-level criminal interference.

WE WARNED ABOUT SARKOZY. NO-ONE PAID ANY ATTENTION…
On 11th January 2008, we reported, you may recall, as follows:

‘Godfather Bush Sr.’s long-established practice is, wherever possible, to perpetrate his financial crimes and thefts through a cut-out – in this case, the current CIA operative ‘bag man’ using the alias Marvin Davis, who has been paying off corrupt politicians at home and abroad. Beneficiaries of the largesse of the fake Mr Marvin Davis may well include present and former Presidents and Heads of Government, and possibly also Nicolas Sarkozy, Bush Jr.’s new highest-level partner in High Financial Crimes and Misdemeanours. Nicolas Sarkozy supervised receipt of the stolen $44 trillion at Paribas (see the preceding report) on behalf of Godfather Bush, we are told’.

On 24th January it was confirmed to the Editor of this service that the allegedly corrupt President of France, Nicolas Sarkozy, and his corrupt partner in High Crimes and Misdemeanours, President George W. Bush Jr., had indeed been engaged in illegal off-balance sheet trading operations, as explicitly implied in the final sentence of the preceding (requoted) paragraph, which apparently caused annoyance in certain US official/intelligence circles.

Let us pause here to consider the alternative reasons for such reported ‘annoyance’:

• Either those up whose noses that sentence ‘got’ did not believe what we had stated: or:

• They knew perfectly well that Sarkozy was President George Corruptissimo Bush’s new illegal off-the-books trading partner, and were apoplectic that we had deduced that this was indeed the case. However we had long since indicated that this was likely, as you will be reminded at the end of this report. But for the moment, we revert to the present/last two days:

WORLD COURT TO PARIBAS: RELEASE OR BE SEIZED:
BOARD COULD HAVE BEEN ARRESTED ON TERRORISM CHARGES
On 24th January, Banque Paribas was served with notice by the World Court under the terms of which it was ORDERED to release the funds to the attorney for the US Trustee, or the bank would be seized by the World Court and would then be compelled to release the funds anyway. Here we must first digress back to an earlier report again, as follows:

It will be recalled that on 15th November 2007 we pointed out that bankers arrested under anti-terrorism laws and held in a European destination would be vulnerable to a minimum of 25 years in jail as terrorists with no hope of release within that period, or probably within their lifetimes.

This is what we stated on 15th November:

CROOKS ADVISE BUSH TO PAY, SO THEY WON’T BE ARRESTED
The situation is ‘so bad’ for these criminal people, all of them, that Bush Jr.’s ‘friends’ met with the President on the morning of 14th November and told him to make the Wanta payment ‘because they don’t want to be arrested’.

Please pause to take note of what this means:

• These Bush ‘friends’ did NOT advise the President of the United States to ‘allow’ the payment to be made BECAUSE IT IS THE RIGHT AND LAWFUL THING TO DO, BUT IN ORDER TO AVOID THE STARK DANGER THAT THEY THEMSELVES WILL BE ARRESTED LIKE SO MANY OTHERS HAVE BEEN.

• In other words, THEY NEVER INTENDED THAT MR WANTA SHOULD EVER GET PAID, AND THAT THE UNLAWFULLY LINKED PAYMENTS SHOULD EVER TAKE PLACE, and the payments will only happen BECAUSE THESE PEOPLE DON’T WANT TO BE ARRESTED AND TO BE SHIPPED OFF TO A EUROPEAN DESTINATION UNDER DRASTIC ANTI-TERRORISM LAWS.

Thus, as we always anticipated, the only reason the matter is going to be settled is that these criminals are being forced to do what they never intended to do, what they have never wanted to do and what they still don’t want to do, because they don’t like the idea of being confined for 25 years or life in a British. German or Swiss maximum security jail under the relevant anti-terrorism legislation. That is the ONLY factor that’s driving them to settle.

FACED WITH SEIZURE + JAIL, PARIBAS ‘TRIGGERS RELEASE’ ON 24TH JANUARY
Reverting to the current context, relevant staff at Paribas realised, on 24th January 2008, that they themselves would be liable to precisely this treatment unless they complied at once with the World Court’s order. Earlier, a banker had been appointed to replace the selected banker who had failed to deliver, on the preceding day: but he had also reneged on his responsibilities, leaving the bank when the World Court officials arrived there, we believe (unconfirmed detail). Who knows, it may even have been borne in on the wayward and perverse French President that he had better take note of the fact that Paribas would no longer be paying attention to his duplicitous instructions for the payout to be frustrated (so that he could continue his illegal financial trading operations with his ‘Kennebunkport trading buddy’ (see below), the corrupt American President).

BANK WAS IN CONTEMPT OF WORLD COURT ORDER
Specifically, having again, on 24th January, aborted the aforementioned payout, Paribas was IN CONTEMPT OF THE WORLD COURT’S ORDER. When this became evident, an (unknown to us) US banking/Treasury official was despatched to Paris, arriving there in the evening of 24th January.

At about 9.10pm, and also some 20 minutes later, we were made aware of the fact that Paribas had suddenly reversed itself and that the necessary payout sequences had been triggered, in de facto defiance of the corrupt instructions attributed to the President of France, M. Sarkozy.

BOARD PREFERRED TO AVOID JAIL RATHER THAN TO OBEY SARKOZY
As noted above, the institution’s General Management, fearing that the bank would indeed be seized and that the Board would be arrested on terrorism charges along with co-conspiring staff, in accordance with the logic of the World Court’s order, decided to defy the President of France and to perform. It would appear that a suitably forceful message was (ironically) delivered by the US banker/official upon his arrival in Paris, not least to the effect that the French President had better understand that he was on his own, as the corrupt President of the United States’ ‘hands were tied’ in respect of any further illegal financial transactions. True, we have been told all this before, and the maniac has nonetheless continued to behave as though he is subject to no authority and can operate ad infinitum beyond the law. Nevertheless, the rug was pulled on 24th January, we believe.

REPRESENTATIVES OF THE 160 COUNTRIES FINALLY SWORN IN
Meanwhile, in the United States, the representatives of the 160 countries (see our earlier reports) were all sworn in en bloc at the relevant Bank of America branch in Connecticut (location of a key trustee) at 10.00am on 24th January, so that they could perform their allotted tasks under the mass settlement and refinancing operation.

Specifically, each representative had to swear absolute confidentiality, and that he or she would proceed to take full responsibility for making the necessary allotted payments under the complex layered tier structure, in accordance with their standing instructions.

The penalty awaiting these representatives in the event of their failure to perform in any respect whatsoever would be arrest and immediate deportation to The Hague, seat of the World Court. It is understood that the arresting powers are (a) Interpol and (b) Britain’s MI6.

No American law enforcement powers are involved.

THE MULTI-TIERED ‘PAYMENT DOMINO’ STRUCTURE
The tiered payee/recipient ‘domino’ payment structure, established as indicated above by Bush-Greenspan in such a way that (so they have long imagined) the interlocking transactions could be destabilised and thwarted at any stage by means of sabotaging one or more key targeted payouts – enabling the stolen funds and related accruals to be held and traded by their criminal networks indefinitely – was layered roughly as follows [please note that this outline information must not be construed as authoritative: it represents what we understand to be the case to the best of our knowledge and belief]:

Tier One: The Group of Eight/Group of Ten countries (incorporating Russia and China) and key ‘special’ recipients and trustees incorporated within Tier One. Tier One pays Tier Two.

Tier Two: The 160 national representatives referenced above. Tier Two pays Tier Three.

Tier Three: OMEGA Ponzi financial scam victims and investor trustees, thought to number about 420 trustees, with perhaps 20,000 recipients between them. Tier Three pays Tier Four.

Tier Four: Retired US Federal Government officials and their families who were scammed by their own Government and were never paid. Tier Four pays Tier Five.

Tier Five: Smaller bankers and institutions that invested funds (in $100 or $200 million increments) into high-yield investment programs and were never paid out (i.e. were scammed, in accordance with the Bush-Greenspan ‘never-pay’ model: see above). Tier Five pays Tier Six.

[Subsequent details unknown].

It is understood that there were originally eleven such Tiers, but that Tiers Nine, Ten and Eleven have been ‘cancelled’ or merged, as the funds in question may have been stolen by Bush Sr. (41) and by former President Clinton (42). The Katrina funds, as we pointed out in an earlier report, were stolen (worth $2.1 billion).

On 12th January, the Editor was advised that these persistent giga-crooks ‘can no longer steal paper off the books’. However as the brazen further illegal trading at presidential level between Sarokozycrook and Bushcrook over the ‘Martin Luther King weekend’ in the United States until 24th January has reconfirmed, if the cancer is blocked from spreading along one artery, it has hitherto found a way to travel down another one almost immediately. UP TILL NOW.

BACKGROUND NOISES
We omit references here to the massive Psy-Ops obfuscation operations conducted, we believe, by the disinformation apparat directed by the sinister Himmlerian ‘former’ MK-Ultra controller, Bush Sr. handler and operative Vice President Cheney, that materialised in recent weeks and days, to which we shall return with revealing details at an appropriate time of our choosing.

On 16th January, we were advised that the World Court had appointed their own bankers to function inside key paying banks, after they had undergone strict security and integrity checks, causing further delays. These people were selected because it was finally realised that no US banker can be trusted (a point that we have laboriously tried to convey these last 18+ months).

On 17th January, we received several reports that a batch of 150 bankers had been arrested.

On 18th January, the phrase ‘it’s a bloodbath’ was used in two telephone conversations, and when we asked whether such language was to be interpreted figuratively or literally, we were told: ‘Both’. The phrase ‘a lot of bloodletting’ was also used on that date by reliable telephone correspondents. Other comments received from informed non-British sources at 3.15pm on 18th January:

‘Many bankers have been arrested. Some have been eliminated. There’s a lot of yelling and screaming. The rats are shooting the rats’.

Undsoweiter…

Concerning the extreme market gyrations, here is an accurate general way of looking at what has been happening. The Editor wrote this broad assessment on 23rd January and updated it on 24th January, but it remains applicable as a generic explanation. Note that the explanation is completely detached from the vacuous, knee-jerk observations of commentators who spend all 100% of their time ‘goofing at the numbers’, whereas they should be trying to assess flow-of-funds patterns:

The reason the market went to hell (predicted: see posts dated 2nd September 2006, 18th and 27th July 2007 and 8th September 2007, specifically re choosing between the Wanta Plan and the ‘train wreck’) is (a) that they didn’t do it when they should have done it, and (b) it has been done way after when it should have been done because of their continuing corrupt trading operations; but the money has finally been shifted, by and large, to the right wholesale places, so that it ceased to be in the wrong wholesale places which were supporting values; so with the funds finally shifted, the falsely supported values collapsed. Certain repositioned funds were then tapped to regalvanise the market, with huge profits (at the expense of uninformed panic-driven investors) accruing to institutions and investors, including criminalist cadres, who needed to ‘restore’ their positions.

Finally for this ‘background noises’ section, impeccable sources in contact with the only forces that matter advised overnight on 25th January 2008 that ‘steps are being taken’ so that ‘things are to be changed permanently’. Put it this way: our sources confirm that the highest-level criminal American scamming operatives face their come-uppance as never before. But (a) because the Editor is a Brit and therefore cannot comment on the internal affairs of his beloved America and (b) for manifestly obvious reasons, no further advice in this department can be forthcoming at this juncture, a line has to be drawn here for the time being. It would be as well if anxious Internet trawlers would just relax a little, not get so het up, and instead follow the sound advice in Scripture: Watch and Pray.

Going back to what we posted earlier, our report of 9th November 2007 contained the following:

FOREIGN DIPLOMATS SNUB CRIMINAL U.S. PRESIDENT
As previously reported, none of the 160 diplomatic delegates from foreign countries who flew into New York over last weekend to take economic receipt of their payments answered any calls from President Bush and the White House.

The countries concerned regard George W. Bush as a criminal financial bandit who is facing his day of reckoning, and they wished to have nothing to do with him.

YET NICOLAS SARKOZIES UP TO THE U.S. PRESIDENT
The exception has been President Sarkozy, who arrived in New York on 6th November, to sign off on his country’s payment, and also to make sure that no further problems arose at Banque Paribas, where eight male and two female employees were arrested earlier (see the preceding report) in the presence of President Sarkozy himself. The French President, who signed his papers at 10.00 am on Tuesday, then departed for Washington, where, in a most bizarre encounter, he had dinner with the criminal President Bush Jr. at the White House.

So here was the new French President, who had been charged by the World Court with facilitating the Wanta (and linked) payments when he came to office (otherwise he himself could be arrested), dining with the arch criminal who has been systematically not only blocking the Wanta Settlement, but also creaming off, with the assistance of his corrupt associate Henry M. Paulson, vast amounts of money, including the $47 trillion that they diverted between 31st October and the 7th November. Whether M. Sarkozy was telling Bush that, whether he liked it or not, the game is up, has not been divulged to us given that we had no flies on the wall of the White House banqueting room.

SARKOZY A PERFECT SPECIMEN OF A DOUBLE-MINDED OPERATIVE
We also cited an article by Heather Timmons and Katrin Bennhold published in the International Herald Tribune on 30 August 07 entitled ‘CALLS GROW LOUDER FOR INTERNATIONAL OVERVIEW OF U.S. MARKETS’, which contained the following passage, projecting the ‘public face’ of French President Sarkozy:

‘In Europe, the credit crisis appears to have emboldened those who have pushed for stricter international rules for some time.

The German Government was rebuffed by Washington and London earlier when it pushed for an international code of conduct for hedge funds [at the G-8 Meeting in June – Editor]. Now some economic advisers to the German Government are going further, suggesting that rating agencies should be nationalized, that large-scale loans be registered publicly and that minimum standards be developed for complex debt securities.

The head of the French Council of Economic Analysis, which advises the Prime Minister, said hedge funds should be subject to stricter disclosure rules about their risk exposure.

Christian de Boissieu, President of the group and a member of the Committee for Credit and Investment Institutions, which helps regulate the French banking sector, is also calling for a global register of all hedge funds. In addition, he said, complex securities should be scrutinized before being authorized for banking portfolios.

President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, who has vowed to ‘moralize financial capitalism’ (a remarkable statement, in view of his alleged participation following his visit to Kennebunkport – Editor) has asked his Finance Minister, Christine Lagarde, to prepare a proposal for stricter disclosure rules on market participants before a meeting of the Group of 7 countries’ Finance Ministers in October [at the IMF/World Bank Annual Meetings – Editor].

On Monday, in a foreign policy speech, Sarkozy called again for an enhanced global rule book to avoid financial crises.

Such crises could recur, “if the leaders of major countries fail to take resolute concerted action to foster transparency and regulation of international markets”, Sarkozy said’.

‘MORALISING FINANCIAL CAPITALISM’ = CARRYING ON STEALING
Hence, on the one hand, Sarkozy took it upon himself to signal that he intends to ‘moralise financial capitalism’ while also calling for ‘resolute concerted action to foster transparency and regulation of international markets’; while on the other hand, he has been engaged in corrupt, amoral, glaringly nontransparent geofinancial capitalistic transactions contrary to the ‘public façade’ of financial and moral rectitude that he has self-righteously invoked for public consumption.

In other words, President Sarkozy, like his corrupt erstwhile trading partner President G. W. Bush Jr., is the perfectly formed specimen, as one would expect, of a duplicitous, double-minded, two-faced Illuminati operative who typically speaks out of both sides of his mouth, whose actions are the opposite of his words, and vice versa, and who is ‘always right’ because these people operate on the basis of embedded double standards, governed by the Luciferian principles of ‘Do as Thou Wilt’ and ‘the end justifies the means’.

The exercise of this amorality is accompanied by an absence of any sense of shame, ‘perfectly possessed’ arrogance, disdain for all authority, and a mindset driven by the certainty that their behaviour can never be subject to any limitations or constraints whatsoever.

(By the way, Gordon Brown never mentions ‘the New World Order’ before a British audience. But while he was travelling in Asia, he mentioned this tell-tale phrase all the time, according to a family member who noticed such references inter alia in The Straits Times, Singapore.

Well, he couldn’t or wouldn’t answer the Editor’s straightforward question [see report dated 22nd January] as to whether he had read the Lisbon E.U. Treaty, which destroys what remains of British sovereignty in line with pan-German long-range deception strategy, before he signed it: so need we be surprised? Pity this man hasn’t got any convictions of his own).

Amazingly, as we also pointed out on 9th November 2007, President Sarkozy had been made aware, prior to assuming the French Presidency last year, that he would indeed be required by the world community to fulfil France’s financial commitments with respect to the Wanta and other refinancing settlement commitments.

Although we suspected that the two suddenly pally Presidents were indeed up to no good, we couched the passages cited above in the most generous syntax possible, leaning over backwards to ‘assume’ that M. Sarkozy was not going to ‘enter into partnership’ with the Criminal President of the United States. Who, after all, were we to prejudge what appears to have been stitched up at Kennebunkport, concerning which little get-together we had reported on 10th Augsut 2007:

FRENCH PRESIDENT AIMING TO DISPLACE THE BRITISH
Given the alienation of the British from the United States due to this Presidency’s incompetence, ineptitude and obtuse certainty of its own depraved ‘rectitude’, the new French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, of Jewish Hungarian extraction, has been falling over backwards to ingratiate himself with the La Famille Bush.

Having been invited to Kennebunkport while he was ‘vacationing’ in nearby New Hampshire, the French President suddenly found his presence required back in France to attend the funeral of the (Jewish) Archbishop of Paris, Cardinal Jean-Marie Lustiger. The next day, he flew straight back to America, to attend what has been described as a ‘casual lunch’, with Bush I and II. A photograph of the two Bushes with Sarkozy during a boat ride, has been widely publicised.

What has not been reported at all is the fact that on one occasion when photographers appeared to be getting too close to the new French President while out boating with separate hosts on a New Hampshire lake, he flew into what appeared to be a rage, jumped into a boat that was full of media photographers, and gave them a severe tongue-lashing for getting too close to him.

A photograph appeared in Le Libre Journal of 16th April 2007 [Issue Number 405, page 6] in which Sarkozy is shown standing with both hands clasping a minora which he is holding against his chest, and flanked to his right by two orthodox Jews, complete with black hats, beards and black suiting, and to his left by two secular gentlemen. The article, and the photograph in which it appears, were sent to the Editor by a correspondent in Paris a few days ago.

• FACT: The Editor has a good and kind, long-standing friend who is the Education Director of a Jewish establishment in a certain US State. In discussions with this friend over the years, your correspondent, citing the high incidence of Jewish participation observable in corrupt financial activities, has pointed out that this behaviour could well be described as being cumulatively very dangerous for the Jewish people, in view of their horrific historical experiences believed to have been triggered, in part, however inexcusably, by such perverse activities. The Editor’s dear friend responded that this behaviour caused his community continuing heartbreak and anxiety, not least for precisely the reason alluded to here. It is probably too much to expect that the community will learn anything at all from the fact that the entire world financial economy has been brought to the brink (literally) of irrecoverable meltdown by such serial aberrant behaviour (in which of course people from many backgrounds have been participating), masterminded inter alia by Henry M. Paulson, with disastrous consequences for him personally. But the point needs to be made.

Some years ago, a prominent individual from the community in New York alluded precisely to such a danger. His timely warning, which we seem to recall fell on deaf ears at that time, should belatedly, we suggest, be heeded now. There is no law that states that history must invariably repeat itself.

God forbid.

Finally, may we be so bold as to ‘remind’ Citibank/Citigroup of their additional agreed-upon financial obligations towards Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta/his Commonwealth of Virginia-based corporation. AmeriTrust Groupe Inc. This passage is replicated from our report of 6th November:

CITIBANK MUST PAY $350 BILLION+ INTEREST UNDER U.C.C. REGULATIONS
Uniform Commercial Code: Article 4A – Funds Transfer: Section 4A-305:
LIABILITY FOR LATE OR IMPROPER EXECUTION OR FAILURE TO EXECUTE PAYMENT ORDER:

(a) If a funds transfer is completed but execution of a payment order by the receiving bank… results in delay in payment to the beneficiary, the bank is obliged to pay interest… to the beneficiary of the funds transfer for the period of delay caused by the improper execution.

As stated in our report dated 4th October, we then calculated that the amount of interest payable to the beneficiary by Citibank, given its delay in paying out the diverted funds since June 2006, was around $350 billion. This amount is rising BY THE DAY, and is now approaching $400 billion.

• [As we revealed at the time] Citibank ‘agreed’ to pay $352 billion by way of interest, following our publication of the above statements. However, the Editor, not being a banker, merely made a rough guestimate at the amount of interest payable by Citibank, consequent upon its criminal frustration and diversion of the Settlement funds since June 2006.

• The actual amount of interest payable by Citibank as an interest penalty, if calculated on the basis of overnight rates, might approximate well over $1.0 trillion. So the institution, having been made aware of our posting dated 1st November, grabbed the Editor’s rough estimate of $350 billion, and added a couple of billion on to make the figure look different. ENDS.

YOU CAN ORDER WANTAGATE ISSUES OF OUR FINANCIAL JOURNAL AS A PACKAGE
We sell, as a special package, the relevant recent back issues of International Currency Review, containing a massive amount of information and back-up documentation, for a flat fee of $750.00, payable in advance. Please use the CONTACT US facility to place your order and send check to the London office: World Reports Limited, 108 Horseferry Road, Westminster, London SW1P 2EF, United Kingdom. Orders may also be emailed direct to the Editor at: cstory@worldreports.org.

• Another way of ordering this package is to (a) forward us a CONTACT US email requesting the package, and then (b) to order International Currency Review via the ultra-safe ordering facility at the World Reports Limited section of this website.

• Please state in the CONTACT US facility that you have ordered International Currency Review but that you specifically want to receive the Wantagate package only.

• Editor’s Note: We are still, from time to time, receiving emails from frustrated people seeking documentation to ‘back up’ what we publish in these reports. Such correspondents choose to overlook the well-known fact that we have published several huge issues of International Currency Review [SEE ABOVE] which contain hundreds of pages of facsimiles of relevant documents. Since we are a commercial operation, we cannot make these volumes available free of charge.

• However copies are available in many university and other libraries around the world, and of course they can be ordered via this website at any time. But the main point here is that complaints along these lines reveal lack of knowledge of the background, which is that an immense volume of relevant documents has been published in our printed intelligence services.

LEGAL SECTION:
PLEASE READ THIS INFORMATION, AS IT INDICATES THE DEPTH OF THE DEPRAVITY THAT WANTAGATE HAS EXPOSED. REPETITION OF THIS BASIC DATA IS STILL NECESSARY…

• We now repeat, yet again, our familiar summary of the Statutes, securities regulations and fraud information that we have appended to these reports for many months. The reason we append this information is to remind everyone of their clear responsibilities under the US Misprision of Felony legislation, and of course to provide a legal basis for these reports.

LEGAL RECAPITULATION FROM REPORT DATED 30TH AUGUST 2007:
Reiteration of the fraudulent transactions involving Bank of New York Mellon – a bank so arrogant and conspicuously indifferent both to its tarnished reputation and to its grotesque breaches of US law and of N.A.S.D./S.E.C. Regulations, that it now takes first prize in the crowded competition for the title of ‘Most arrogant and corrupt financial institution in America’. At least, this was the case until the perpetration of the ‘Saturday scam’ described above and on 13th November:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• ‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON IS IN BREACH AND OF WHICH THE SIX ‘LEVY BANKS’ MAY LIKEWISE BE VARIOUSLY IN BREACH [CREDIT SUISSE, UBS, DEUTSCHE BANK, BANK OF AMERICA, CITIBANK, THE BANK OF ENGLAND]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is in violation of:
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR SIR LEO WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT THE HIGHEST U.S. LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006, AND HAVE CONTINUED THEIR SERIAL CRIMES EVER SINCE:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war

This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Wanta’s funds.

The Directors and others listed in Part 1 of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and others posted on 11th June may likewise be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious violation of the laws itemised above. This list is reproduced in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, September 2007, on pages 163-168.

U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: MISPRISION OF FELONY:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

Wicked Pedia Update dated 2nd December 2007:

WIKIPEDIA IS PART OF AN NSA DISCREDITING OPERATION
As previously reported, the Editor’s attention was drawn, in the second half of November 2007, to a pack of old lies, diversionary claptrap and disinformation posted on Wikipedia under ‘Leo Wanta’.

Although this posting appeared FOR THE FIRST TIME on 12th November 2007, it consisted almost entirely of ancient lies, including disinformation dredged out of ‘Thieves’ World’, a hatchet job published in 1994 by Simon and Schuster by the late Claire Sterling, a CIA operative.

Mrs Sterling died suddenly after being summoned for her second meeting with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, under Clinton.

ANCIENT DISCREDITED LIES POSTED IN NOVEMBER 2007
The fact that the OLD Wikipedia lies appeared for the first time as late as 12th November 2007, and consisted almost totally of old, discredited lies, omitting the Master Lie that the CIA retailed after the Ambassador had been taken down, namely that he was DEAD, indicated quite clearly to the Editor and his advisers that this latest evil display of regurgitated disinformation represented a deliberate operation by the US intelligence community’s disinformation and lie machine, to begin, all over again, the process of discrediting Ambassador Leo Wanta – so that they can relieve him of his funds by some false pretext or other after a ‘gag order’ has been signed.

The definitive up-to-date information on the Ambassador’s affairs has been published on this website, and in several issues of International Currency Review, Economic Intelligence Review, Soviet Analyst and Arab-Asian Affairs, all published by World Reports Limited, for several years. Copies of these publications are in official, institutional and library hands all over the world. Therefore, any posting about Ambassador Wanta that relies upon ancient lies and fails to take account of the accurate information that we have published, can easily be demonstrated to represent yet another US intelligence community and NSA discrediting operation.

PRELUDE TO ‘SETTING UP’ WANTA ALL OVER AGAIN
We now understand that the Principals have been advised (for the past several weeks) that they will not be allowed to reveal that they have been paid. This loony state of affairs is designed to ‘set them up’ for a future discrediting operation whereby false witness will be deployed against them to the effect that they have stolen the money, or some such pack of lies, which they will be unable to refute because they will be bound by the ‘prerequisite’ gag order that is intended. Its purpose, of course, is to ‘legitimise’ the old and new lies that the US disinformation apparat will be preparing for future use. The likelihood is that the new discrediting operation will be extended to Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., as well. We are prepared for this intended onslaught.

EDITOR’S TRUE REPORT REPEATEDLY REPLACED BY OLD LIES
On 19th November, the Editor posted on Wikipedia the accurate text about Leo Wanta that is now reproduced below. The Editor’s accurate text was then removed by Wikipedia, leaving the ‘old lies’ that had existed previously. When the Editor became aware of this, he reposted the accurate text below, and, given that his own copy had been deleted, he then deleted the pack of lies, leaving his own accurate text up on the Wikipedia site instead, without the lies.

On 2nd December, the Editor was advised by a monitor that the Editor’s accurate text had been removed and that the old discrediting lies had been reposted on the page by Wikipedia. When the Editor checked, he found that the page could no longer be edited because of what the site managers described as ‘vandalism’.

IT’S ‘VANDALISM’ TO POST THE TRUTH, NOT ‘VANDALISM’ TO POST LIES
It was not ‘vandalism’ to delete the truth and to replace the truth by old lies, but it was ‘vandalism’ to delete ‘old lies’ and replace them by the truth.

We are therefore able to conclude from this Wicked Pedia outrage, as follows:

1. Wikipedia, which purports to ‘change the world’, prefers lies to the truth.

2. Wikipedia is therefore, by definition, a source of disinformation and lies, and cannot be trusted as a source of reliable information in any context.

3. The only category of sick society that would have any interest in disseminating lies about Ambassador Wanta, the United States’ greatest living patriot, rather than the truth, is the mentally disturbed US counterintelligence disinformation apparat (a.k.a. the US STUPIDITY COMMUNITY) which, by its actions in deleting the Editor’s ACCURATE information and replacing it with old lies, and by its illegal behaviour in ‘snipping’ our website texts as stated above, thereby reveals the desperation of its concerns, which all have to do with covering up official criminality.

4. It is now far too late for the US stupidity community to repair the damage that it has done since June 2006, when the Ambassador’s funds were first hijacked by the criminal financial operative Henry M. Paulson, US Treasury Secretary. So it is laying the groundwork for a renewed discrediting operation against Ambassador Wanta and his colleagues.

• We and others will see to it that this intention is defeated, and that such nefarious scheming is exposed for the amoral and disgusting Luciferian behaviour that it represents.

The ACCURATE text that the Editor posted on the Wikipedia site, follows. (The Editor, after all, PAID FOR AMBASSADOR WANTA’S EXIT FROM PROBATION, FOR GOODNESS SAKE, SO HE CAN HARDLY BE A SOURCE OF DISINFORMATION, CAN HE?). This information will be very widely distributed by other means, in order to provide all concerned with the necessary ‘heads-up’ as to what these US Dark Forces have in mind. They are out of their minds and in Satan’s mind:

The disinformation about Leo Wanta (Lee Wanta) below was first posted on 12th November 2007. It contains ancient CIA disinformation and long since exposed lies going back to the early 1990s, and obfuscates the truth. The report appended immediately below was added on 19th November 2007, to correct the disinformation contained in the original stub.

It was subsequently removed and is hereby replaced. This sequence of events, which suggests that egregious lies are preferred to the truth, has been recorded on www.worldreports.org, which contains all the updated and breaking Wanta material, that was ignored and traduced in the stub at the foot of this report.

THE ACCURATE TEXT THAT WIKIPEDIA REPEATEDLY DELETED
This is the correct information that we posted on 19th November 2007:

The ‘information’ posted below represents a deliberately malevolent, false disinformation picture which has no bearing on reality. It is a travesty of the truth of the matter and cites Christopher Story as the author of some of the disinformation, which is libellous and implies that Story, the veteran
Editor of International Currency Review of nearly 40 years’ standing, is engaged in the egregious dissemination of lies, which is not the case.

This is such an egregiously malevolent stub of disinformation that readers should prudently dismiss it altogether; they should start afresh by accessing Christopher Story‘s website, which is: www.worldreports.org., reading from the Archive.

www.worldreports.org is the authoritative source for all updated information on Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta. The source ‘Thieves’ World’ was a CIA disinformation work prepared by the late CIA disinformation operative Claire Sterling, published in 1994.

This stub regurgitates ancient lies perpetrated by the CIA, which lied for many years that Lee (Leo being his intelligence community name) Wanta was dead. The CIA proclaimed that he was dead so that corrupt cadres could ransack his funds (see below).

He ‘ceased to be dead’ with effect from 21st July 2005 after Christopher Story, a British private citizen, had paid $35,000 from his scarce private funds pro bono publico by way of ‘restitution’ to an American lawyer for onward payment to the Wisconsin State Department of Corrections, to procure Mr Wanta’s release from his illegal probation.

Despite his Ambassadorial status, Wanta had been illegally ‘taken down’ in Switzerland on 7th July 1993 without a warrant on a trumped-up Wisconsin State charge of having failed to pay $14,129 in falsely assessed Wisconsin State fabricated tax that he never owed because he had been resident in Vienna on US Presidential intelligence work since June 1988.

This data is all in the public domain, has been published for several years in International Currency Review, the Journal of the World Financial Community, and can be read on Mr Story’s website.

International Currency Review is a banking and financial journal with a worldwide circulation:
ISSN 0020-6490. It is published by World Reports Limited, London.

Notwithstanding that this fabricated tax demand (orchestrated by US criminal intelligence) had been paid twice under protest by Lee Emil Wanta from abroad (in May and June 1992), the funds were improperly allocated by the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue and were never credited to the false account maintained by them for the Ambassador. (Christopher Story holds documentary
proof of both payments). They were paid a third time by Christopher Story in June 2005, which action duly procured Mr Wanta’s release from illegal probation effective 14th November 2005.

As a consequence of Wanta thus ceasing to be dead, the CIA’s lie that he was dead collapsed in chaos, and all the subsidiary old false witness lies that the CIA had perpetrated, including those assembled for disinformation purposes in the stub below (which, in line with the standard false witness used throughout by detractors, attempts to portray Christopher Story as a source of disinformation) were discredited as well.

Why was Wanta taken down? So that the criminal intelligence cadres running the US Government could ransack the $27.5 trillion of funds assembled by Leo Wanta on President Reagan’s orders, in the course of his Financial Warfare operations against the USSR.

Under Reagan’s Executive Order 12333 of 1981, US intelligence officers were permitted to establish corporations which could thereafter contract with the CIA/DIA/DEA/NSA et al for the purpose of fulfilling allotted intelligence tasks allocated to them.

The financial proceeds of operations conducted by such corporations were consequently the property of the corporations and thus of their shareholders, a legal fact of life which has never been, and cannot be, disputed. This was not a good idea because almost all US intelligence
operatives are liars and do not function on the basis of the Rule of Law at all, if they can help it.

Lee Wanta is the well-known patriotic exception to this rule: he operates solely in accordance with US law, in contrast to the behaviour of other US operatives, which is why the kakocracy* needed to remove him from the scene, as duly occurred July 1993.

Once Wanta had been illegally arrested (contrary to international law, as a diplomat) and then thrown into a stinking Swiss jail on 7th July 1993, the criminal cadres inside the US official structures immediately ransacked Mr Wanta’s bank accounts according to plan.

The history of this matter is, and has been, elaborated in great depth on Christopher Story‘s website www.worldreports.org. and has been extensively published, as mentioned, in International Currency Review and other World Reports Limited intelligence publications.

Students are advised perhaps to begin with the ‘Wisconsingate’ report dated 6th August 2007, which forensically dissects, with detailed documentary back-up, the Wisconsin Department of Revenue’s tax fabrication operation against Wanta, stretching back for over 20 years, that has been exposed by Christopher Story in minute detail, and which formed the fabricated basis for Wanta’s illegal takedown in 1993, despite the fact that Wisconsin has no jurisdiction beyond its borders.

The overall Wantagate crisis, which is the sole and continuing underlying cause of the prevailing global financial and economic day of reckoning that the world is now facing, has been triggered by the fact that the George W. Bush Jr. White House, aided and abetted by other senior office-holders, hijacked the compromise financial settlement of $4.5 trillion that the White House itself agreed (in a classified accord that was finalised in May 2006) should be paid over to Ambassador Wanta, so that the stolen and diverted remaining $23 trillion of his funds (and the many hundreds of trillions of dollars hypothecated upon them) could be released from a de facto lien arising from the collapse of the CIA’s lie that Wanta was dead.

For clearly, since he had ceased to be dead, 100% of these funds (plus the hundreds of trillions of fiat ‘funny’ money generated by illegal leveraged operations from that base) belonged to Lee Wanta and to no-one else: a situation that the banks ‘could not handle’.

The entire narrative of what has become the worst financial corruption crisis in world history (which this stub consisting of disinformation attempts to obfuscate) is set out in great detail on Christopher Story‘s website www.worldreports.org., to which all readers are directed in order for the accurate state of affairs to be understood. As indicated, this stub below is a travesty and a disgrace, as it regurgitates long since discredited CIA lies, presents a diversionary, distorted and misleading picture, and because it malevolently incorporates Christopher Story as a source for some of this disinformation.

It is a disgusting instance of ignorant and malevolent US counterintelligence disinformation and deceit at its very worst.

All the statements in the above commentary may be verified by reference to www.worldreports.org and International Currency Review. Another publication covering this matter in detail is Economic Intelligence Review, also published by World Reports Limited, London. Wanta students should access the Archive on the www.worldreports.org Home Page.

A book devoted to Ambassador Wanta and the Wantagate crisis is in preparation

The Wanta disinformation referred to above has been deleted from this page. ENDS.

DIPLOMATIC STATUS OF THE PRINCIPALS
The Ambassador and his colleagues now have special diplomatic status (conferred upon them by HM The Queen in 2007), which means that the Ambassador is now an Ambassador several times over. This factor greatly complicates the intended discrediting offensive that the mad US stupidity community’s Dark Forces contemplate, their sole objective being of course to cover up their own criminality, in line with pending ‘thought crime’ legislation which has the same Nazi-style objective.

*Note: ‘Kakocracy’: Governance by a clique representing the worst elements of society, in their interests and to the exclusion of all other interests, from the Greek, kakos, meaning foul, or filthy.

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier Wantagate reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

 DID BROWN BOTHER TO READ THE LISBON E.U. TREATY?

DOWNING STREET WON’T SAY. EDITOR’S REPEATED QUESTION UNANSWERED

Tuesday 22 January 2008 14:02

35 BRITISH BUSINESSMEN (‘USEFUL IDIOTS’) VOICE MINDLESS SUPPORT FOR TREATY…

…THEREBY CONDONING OPEN-ENDED EUROPEAN COMMISSION CORRUPTION AND FRAUD

NOBODY IS RESPONSIBLE, EVERYONE IS TO BLAME, AND WHO CARES ANYWAY?

CORRUPT NAZI ORIGINS OF THE SOCIALIST-COLLECTIVIST E.U. ENTRAPMENT SCAM

LONG-RANGE NAZI ‘SCISSORS’ DECEPTION STRATEGY AGAINST BRITAIN AND AMERICA

HOW WANTAGATE IS LIKELY TO HAVE JEOPARDISED THIS NAZI LONG-RANGE STRATEGY

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for ‘Wantagate’ reports since April 2006. [Note: A new panel giving details of our latest publications as they are made available, has been added].

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing financial global corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial corruption and global financial crisis in history. This website has been calling the shots, because of the hijacking of Wanta’s Settlement. This is the 89th Wantagate report: over a million words to date.

WANTAGATE NOTE:
At first sight, and on a superficial reading, the following report may appear not to have anything to do with Wantagate. However it will be found that, as you read on, this is very far from the case.

DOWNING STREET REFUSES TO SAY WHETHER GORDON BROWN READ THE LISBON TREATY
At 2.55pm on Friday 14th December 2007, the Editor telephoned the Press Office at Number Ten Downing Street, the Residence of the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown.

He asked the following question:

‘Did the Prime Minister read the European Union Treaty document that he has just signed in Portugal, before he signed it?’

The Downing Street Press Office official responded: ‘Er, I’ll get a Press Officer to call you back’.

Christopher Story: ‘Are you unable to answer my question?’

Downing Street Official: ‘I’ll get a Press Officer to call you back’.

Christopher Story: ‘When will that be?’

Downing Street Official: ‘Er, as soon as possible’.

• At 1.30pm on Tuesday 18th December 2007, the Editor telephoned the Press Office at Number Ten Downing Street, the Residence of the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown.

He asked the following question:

‘Did the Prime Minister read the European Union Treaty document that he has just signed in Portugal, before he signed it?’

Downing Street Official: ‘I’m sure he read it’.

Christopher Story: ‘Do you know when he read it?’

Downing Street Official: ‘No, but I can try and find out for you’.

Christopher Story: ‘You’ll call me back?’

Downing Street Official: ‘I will do, certainly’.

• At 11.30am on Tuesday 17th January 2008, the Editor telephoned the Press Office at Number Ten Downing Street, the Residence of the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown.

He asked the following question:

‘Did the Prime Minister read the European Union Treaty document that he has just signed in Portugal, before he signed it?’

Downing Street Official: ‘I’ll get someone to call you back. What’s your phone number, Chris?’

Christopher Story: ‘7222 3836’.

Downing Street Official: ‘I’ll get someone to give you a call back’.

EDITOR DECEIVED BECAUSE DOWNING STREET CALLBACK ASSURANCES WERE FALSE
The Editor of International Currency Review has been lied to by the Prime Minister’s Office.

No-one from the Downing Street Press Office had called him back with an answer to his simple, straightforward question, by the date of this posting.

One does not need to possess a first-class degree in psychology to understand why no answer has been forthcoming. Manifestly:

• If the Prime Minister read the document before he signed it, he is a traitor and is in grotesque breach of his oath of loyalty to the British Head of State, HM The Queen.

• If the Prime Minister did not read the document before he signed it, he is in dereliction of his duty to defend the interests of the British people and the Monarchy, is grossly incompetent, and should be impeached.

• If the question could not be answered, the correct and honest answer should have been:

‘We cannot answer your question’.

Obviously, officials decided that their safest course would be not to respond at all, so that (a) they cannot be accused of deception and lying, and (b) the matter is conveniently left up in the air.

That is dishonest, small-minded, scandalous and reprehensible.

The Editor of this service, being a member of the press, was entitled to a straight answer to his simple question. He has been given the usual brush-off that is meted out to anyone who has the temerity to query the duplicitous official (revolutionary, anti-nation state) ‘line’.

BRITISH PARLIAMENT DEBATES ITS DEMISE, WHILE ‘USEFUL IDIOTS’ WRITE TO THE PAPERS
In the British House of Commons this week, the European Union (Amendment) Bill is undergoing its second reading. On 9th October of last year, the Labour-dominated House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee confirmed that the ‘revised’ EU Lisbon Treaty document is almost precisely the same as the European Constitution, which was rejected in referenda held in the Netherlands and France in 2005. M. Giscard d’Estaing, the self-important, opinionated patrician former President of France, who was instrumental in composing the original convoluted ‘European Constitution Treaty’, has himself explicitly acknowledged that the latest document ‘is the same as the Constitution’, with cosmetic language adjustments. The European Constitution (today, the Lisbon) Treaty essentially destroys the residual decayed sovereignty of the pathetic constituent satrap European (EU) nation states, in blind accordance with the recklessly accelerating globalist (Illuminati-driven) offensive to destroy all nationalsovereignty and to collectivise everything (Communism).

On 21st January, a posse of 35 characters who are prominent on the British business scene – led by the disgraced former BP boss, Lord Browne, the CEO of WPP, Sir Martin Sorrrell, the Chairman of Apax Partners, Sir Ronald Cohen and the Chairman of J Sainsbury, Sir Philip Hampton, published a letter in The Daily Telegraph containing the following tired and content-free language:

‘As business leaders, we believe that our instinctive [PLEASE NOTE] pro-Europe approach should be complemented by a drive for further [sic] economic reform, and for an effective single market, entailing a level playing field [sic] for all companies. Sometimes it is necessary to be critical of what the EU says and does. But this should be done in the overall context of Britain enjoying a positive relationship with the EU’.

Interpretation:

• ‘Our support for the destruction of national sovereignty is based upon ‘INSTINCT’.

• It is not, therefore, based upon INTELLECT. Now, one might have thought that these great big, self-important businessmen were accustomed to conducting their business operations on the basis of the exercise of intellectual aptitude. Assuming that to be the case, why do they ABANDON the use of their intellects with respect to their support for the European Union?

One presumes that their intellects inform them that corruption within their own organisations is ‘a bad thing’. Why, then, do they tolerate it in the EU context? Are they all mad?

• Or could it be that THEY DIDN’T KNOW THAT THE E.U. COLLECTIVE IS CORRUPT?

FACT: If they didn’t know even that, they are not merely guilty of failing to apply their intellects to this matter: they are ignoramuses, as well.

• ‘Drive for further economic reform’: What is the meaning of the adjective ‘further’ here? To what SPECIFIC economic reform do they refer? As close students of the European Union Collective, we are not aware of any ‘reform’. Since, therefore, no concrete, identifiably relevant ‘economic reform’ has actually taken place, why do they imagine that their call for FURTHER economic reform is in any way meaningful? You cannot have FURTHER economic reform if none has taken place to date.

In any case, these ‘Useful Idiots’ (as Lenin called such people who, wittingly or otherwise, further the evil interests of the Revolution), a political and economic collective is genetically impervious to ‘reform’. And of course, as usual, the ‘Useful Idiots’ never define their terms, do they? What do they MEAN by ‘reform’? They don’t say (because they don’t know, or care).

• ‘Level playing field’: This is a well-known collectivist term. So these supposedly free market UKbusinessmen are collectivists? That may explain why they choose to overlook the striking fact that the annual costs of EU regulation (the basic building block of Communism, by the way) across the 27 EU member States amounts to 600 billion Euros (approximately 5.5% of EU Gross Domestic Product), whereas the much-proclaimed ‘trade benefits’ of thevaunted ‘single market’ that the 35 signatories ‘enjoy’, aggregate only 160 billion Euros.

• The source of this data is Gunter Verheugen (never heard of him?), the European Commission Vice-President responsible for Industry and Enterprise.

• ‘Sometimes’ criticism of the EU is ‘necessary’: ‘Sometimes’? Excuse us!

Any objective, unbrainwashed student of the EU Collective will tell these clowns that criticism of the EU Collective is ESSENTIAL, not just ‘necessary’, 100% of the time.

The organisation is a long-range political scam (see below) and a cesspool of ongoing corruption (see below). Therefore, criticism cannot EVER be occasional, as they deceitfully suggest. It must be ongoing and permanent. Not, by the way, that ‘criticism’ will or can ever have the slightest impact upon the EU’s structures. This is a political collective, after all, and these people, who are so keen, evidently, on collectivisation, appear to have NO IDEA how a collective operates (see below).

• Finally, their ‘occasional criticism’ SHOULD, they say, be proffered in the context of ‘overall support for Britain enjoying a positive relationship with the EU’.

Consider the lazy, mindless intellectual fallacies here:

(a) The implication that one must not draw attention to the fact that this is a political scam and a cesspit of corruption, for fear of jeopardising Britain’s supposedly ‘positive relationship’, which exists only as empty dogma in their weird, naive imaginations. FACT: Britain has NEVER enjoyed a positive relationship with the EU. It has never ENJOYED this relationship. Period.

(b) The false implication that Britain NEEDS to be a member of this corrupt political collective in order to ‘enjoy’ a positive relationship with it.

True, one cannot ‘enjoy’ a positive relationship with any organisation as rotten as the European Union, so the loose language these people use here is unfit for purpose.

FACT: Since the relationship is NOT ENJOYED and is NOT POSITIVE (except in the arid imaginations of these traitors), it does not follow that non-membership would be ‘any worse’.

HOW BRITAIN CAN GET ITSELF OUT OF THE CLUTCHES OF THESE MAD HEGEMONISTS
On the contrary, each and every EU satrap Member State would always NEED to ‘enjoy’ a positive relationship’ with a country as powerful and as important as Britain, not least given its huge market: from which it follows that bilateral, arms-length relationships would plainly fulfil all the needs and aspirations of the individual EU countries – and vice versa, of the United Kingdom.

If, by some miracle, this Editor were ever to be appointed British Foreign Secretary (!), he would immediately order his staff to produce a list of every single bilateral, collective and other external agreement that Britain has with all external entities, including residual nation states. No accords would be exempt. He would require the complacent Foreign Office staff to prepare a single sheet of paper for each accord, stating the expiry date and the period of notice that is legally required under international law to be given. He would further order all existing accords to be subject to a blanket requirement that the relevant legal notice of Britain’s intention not to renew, must be given at the commencement of the period of notice, with no exceptions.

Finally, he would leave it to the other parties to make representations to London as to why they would prefer the existing arrangements to continue; whereupon the staff would be instructed to review each case on its merits but to reach no conclusions pending decisions to be taken wholly and exclusively in accordance with Britain’s national interests (which the EU has collectivised: but this exercise would take precedence, as Britain’s EU membership is, in fact, illegal).

TELEGRAPH HAPPY TO PUBLISH SUCH TRIPE, BUT NOT THE EDITOR’S POINTED LETTER
We have, of course, suffered 35 years of empty rhetoric from ‘Useful Idiots’ such as the 35 ‘Great and Good’ signatories of the letter to The Daily Telegraph. That newspaper was happy to publish their subversive, empty-headed propaganda, but was unwilling to publish the following letter from the Editor of this service dated Saturday, 15th December 2007, and emailed to the newspaper at 2:49pm. (Note: That hardly mattered, of course: The Daily Telegraph’s circulation is less than one million. But according to French intelligence, reports published on this website have at times attracted up to 50 million readers worldwide).

The Editor
The Daily Telegraph
111 Buckingham Palace Road
London SW1W 0DT Fax: 020-7931 2878

Dear Sir:

At 2.55pm on Friday 14th December 2007, the Editor telephoned the Press Office at Number Ten Downing Street, the Residence of the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown.

He asked the following question:

‘Did the Prime Minister read the European Union Treaty document that he has just signed in Portugal, before he signed it?’

The Downing Street Press Office official responded: ‘Er, I’ll get a Press Officer to call you back’.

Christopher Story: ‘Are you unable to answer my question?’

Downing Street Official: ‘I’ll get a Press Officer to call you back’.

Christopher Story: ‘When will that be?’

Downing Street Official: ‘Er, as soon as possible’.

It is now 2.45pm on Saturday afternoon, and I have received no phone call from the Downing Street Press Office.

I and others will be interested to see whether you publish this letter.

Yours faithfully,

Christopher Story FRSA
Editor and Publisher
International Currency Review
World Reports Limited
108 Horseferry Road
Westminster
London SW1P 2EF

CORRUPTION AND OBFUSCATION IN THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION
In order to ‘combat corruption’ in the EU, the European Commission operates an outfit called OLAF (= the EC ‘Anti-Fraud Office’). The Editor has attended sessions of the OLAF Supervisory Board at the European Parliament in Brussels. His observations were as follows:

• The officials on the platform routinely spend a great deal of time congratulating each other on being on the platform because of their ‘distinguished’ records, and generally pumping each other up and massaging each other’s insufferable egos.

• Substantive matters (i.e. corruption issues) are left as late in the agenda as possible, by which time most people have long since got bored stiff and have gone home.

• When substantive internal EC corruption issues cannot be sidestepped altogether, they are routinely tackled by ‘calls for’ new ‘regulations’. Gullible Members of the European Parliament are primed in advance to ‘call for’ such regulations.

• The overall, ongoing objective of OLAF, and of its sycophantic ‘supervisory’ committee, is to kick unavoidable corruption investigations into the no-man’s land that follows the termination of each European Commission’s six-year tenure.

• By this means, when a new Commission arrives, it ‘knows nothing’ about issues facing the previous Commission, and a ‘that was then, this is now’ attitude supervenes.

• A standard obfuscation technique used by the European Commission to hide internal corruption is as follows. Open investigation A. Let it run for a month or two. Then open parallel investigation B. Let it run for some further months. Then arrange for several tame MEPs (Members of the European Parliament) to ‘call for’ investigation C. This then gives rise to ‘calls for’ investigations A and B to be suspended, a.k.a. held in abeyance, pending the outcome of investigation C. If this multi-layered obfuscation methodology fails to kick the embarrassing corruption issue into the no-man’s land between Commissions, open investigation D. Repeat the cycle as necessary.

• The basic rule of thumb is as always follows:

‘Nobody is responsible, everyone else is to blame, and who cares anyway’.

In 2006, the House of Lords’ European Committee conducted an inquiry into the management and audit of expenditure by the European Communities.

Its report, dated November 2006, was entitled ‘Financial Management and Fraud in the European Union: Perceptions, Facts and Proposals’. The damning Lords report found that the European Commission exhibited a cavalier disregard for accuracy, basic integrity and any sense of genuine responsibility for the funds that it manages. On 28th January 2007, a diligent analyst of European Union Collective aberrations, Christopher Booker, wrote as follows in his column in The Sunday Telegraph. (Note: Criticism of the EU is confined to Booker’s column. That’s how it is ‘controlled’):

‘Although the Commission’s operating revenue for 2005 was given, with implausible precision, as 107,890,098.965.56 Euros, it was impossible to discover where most of this money had come from or gone to, because the accounts do not use the double-entry system used by every corner shop. They are just a maze of meaningless figures. For instance, a figure for the EU’s ‘long-term and short-term pre-financing’ suddenly goes up from zero to 28 billion Euros, without explanation’.

EXAMPLES OF EUROPEAN COMMISSION CORRUPTION OBFUSCATION METHODOLOGY
Without going down rabbit-holes on this issue, and purely in order to illustrate the prevailing ethos of institutionalised EC corruption, that so-called pre-financing item should have been treated as cash. If it was not cash, then it was either a receivable debtor, or an expense.

If it was an expense, then the European Commission is paying out sums of money from its budget without completed authority. If it was a receivable debtor, then the omission of the 28 billion Euros from the accounts was either negligence or fraud. Experts have suggested that creditors/accruals are routinely inflated to justify the EC’s budgetary demands from the satrap ‘Member States’.

The controlled EC Court of Auditors (which can make quite rude noises but of course possesses no teeth) complained that taxpayers are having to pay for management and accounting errors, rather than the missing funds being recovered. It exceeded its usual mild criticism with this statement:

‘Such a practice certainly casts doubt on the EU as a community of law and justice because financial corrections do not make illegal or irregular projects and expenditure legal and regular’.

Among innumerable ‘irregularities’, the following can be cited for brief illustration purposes here:

• A massive pension debt vanished, yet the colossal accumulated liability has remained in place.

• On 12th August 2005, Hans-Martin Tillack, a journalist with Stern, reported in the EU Observer, quoted from an internal note written in March 2003 by ‘experts of the OLAF Supervisory Committee’ who alleged that OLAF conducts ‘fake investigations’ [see above].

• Since fraud is endemic within this massive unelected and accountability-free bureaucracy, it is standard practice to ‘allow’ that a certain amount of EC financial fraud takes place, so that it can be ‘cited’ in reports to provide fodder for the media. For instance, Mr Vladimir Spidler, a European Commissioner from the Czech Republic, reported that in 2004, some 266 million Euros-worth of EC allocations were suspended for irregularities. According to the OLAF itself, more than three million Euros is lost every day to EU fraud. OLAF has stated that the cost of EU fraud between 1999 and 2005 was $6.5 billion Euros. None of these data were revealed to the House of Lords’ inquiry; and these figures, as indicated, were cosmetic numbers only.

• The reader of the European Commission’s accounts, which are qualified every year by the Court of Auditors, in order for the Court to be able to retain ‘integrity’, is unable to reconcile the amounts shown on one page with those shown on another page, so that, accordingly, no reliable information is ever provided in EC Accounts documentation.

• Amounts presented are or have been obtained from inventories, which is no substitute for the proper recording of individual transactions. In fact the inventory method of accounting has no value per se at all.

A comprehensive critique of the House of Lords’ findings and of additional indications of massive ongoing European Commission financial fraud was published in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2 [September 2007]. Discrepancies between the closing balances in one year and the opening balances in the next are commonplace.

The former EC Commissioner Neil Kinnock, previously the windbag leader of the Labour Party which Gordon Brown now heads, made some 15 statements to the House of Lords Committee concerning the former Chief Accountant of the EC, Mrs Marta Andreasen, which she disputed.

NEVER-ENDING PLAY-ACTING AND DECEPTION BY THE E.U. COLLECTIVE
In order to provide its unpopular (and illegitimate) policies with fake ‘credibility’, the European Parliament stages, from time to time, what it calls an ‘agora’ (Greek for ‘marketplace’ or forum for public debate). This was the format adopted on 8-9th November 2007 by the controlled Parliament (in which speeches are usually required to be no more than one minute long, or else the MEP risks having the microphone switched off, Soviet style), for its staged informed debate’ on the recycled European Constitution Treaty.

The underlying theme of these events is that the system of one person, one vote (= ‘democracy’) needs to be augmented, a.k.a. supplanted, by ‘participative democracy’, involving so-called ‘civil society actors’ i.e. lobbying organisations (or non-governmental organisations) which turn out to be funded by the Commission itself. Thus, as Roger V. Helmer MEP has explained, ‘the Commission is spending taxpayers’ money to get itself lobbied by people it is funding itself’ – a truly scandalous arrangement that Helmer describes as ‘institutional incest’.

The Editor has attended the European Parliament. It is modelled precisely on, and looks exactly like, like the Supreme Soviet, which is what it is intended to become.

Completion of the transformation can easily be achieved by replacing the pretentious European symbols behind the podium, with a bust of Lenin, and a hammer and sickle.

THE NATIONAL SOCIALIST ORIGINS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIALIST E.U.
Many people remain confused by the fact that the European Union Collective operates as a collective (the Communist model), and yet originated in Nazi Germany (for the purposes of this presentation, although its origins can be traced back much further). We will explain this below.

In a collective, it is intentionally the case that no-one is responsible for anything, since all are responsible collectively for everything: in other words, there is and can be no accountability.

The deluded former ‘Conservative’ Foreign Secretary, Lord Hurd, used to pontificate about the EU being all about ‘cooperation’. He never grasped that this is a crude deception: for ‘cooperation’, read collectivisation. The British Foreign Office, arguably the most penetrated and treacherous of all the British Government structures, labours under this elementary delusion to this day.

• Lord Hurd, by the way, was notoriously overheard, after signing the EU’s Maastricht Treaty in 1992, to have observed: ‘We’d better find out what we’ve just signed’. Downing Street, apparently, cannot even risk informing us that Gordon Brown read the subversive treaty AFTER he signed it.

Like the 35 ‘Useful Idiots’ referenced above, who fondly imagine that it is possible for Britain to have a ‘positive relationship’ with a supranational government that exists specifically in order to usurp the sovereignty of its satrap nation states (under cover of fake, contrived ‘legitimacy’), Hurd used to waffle about ‘fighting our corner in Europe’ or alteratively, ‘being at the centre of Europe’.

The man never grasped, either, that no-one can influence the behaviour of a collective, let alone be ‘at the centre’ of it. A collective is a collective. It doesn’t matter whether one is at the centre, the periphery, half-way to the centre, or on the moon. Decisions are taken collectively, which means that all EU Member States are always permanently subordinate to the collective.

This is so elementary and basic, that one wonders whether these people sit on their brains because they are brainwashed. Part of the brainwashing process conditions their minds into accepting, without any explanation, the ‘need’ for national sovereignty to be ‘shared’.

Likewise, as the late Lord Bruce of Donington, who was the ‘Mr Europe’ in the Callaghan Labour Government that preceded Mrs Thatcher’s first Administration in the 1970s, taught this Editor, the satrap EU nation states have no ‘national interests’ (as UK politicians continue to parrot) because, by definition, the national interests of all the EU nation states have been largely collectivised. The intention is that they should be 100% collectivised: didn’t these ‘Useful Idiots’ know that?

The Editor’s book ‘The New Underworld Order’, like some of our recent serials, displays an image of a very early Nazi Labour Day emblem, showing Karl Marx with a hammer and sickle, above an eagle which is standing on a swastika. Thus the symbols of Nazism (National Socialism) and Communism (International Socialism) are united in this early Nazi emblem – illustrating the dialectical reality and identity of these false, controlled geopolitical ‘opposites’.

These two scourges of mankind come out of the same globalist Illuminati sewer. At the very same time that Karl Marx (Moses Mordecai Levi) was writing the ‘Communist Manifesto’ (Thesis) under the close direction of one group of revolutionary Luciferian Illuminists, Dr Karl Ritter of Frankfurt University, was developing the Antithesis to Marx’s Thesis under instructions from another cadre of the Illuminati. Ritter’s work was continued further by the nihilist German Magus and philosopher Friedrich Wilhelm Nietsche (1844-1900) and by Heidegger and Schmitt, and was then elaborated into Fascism en route to National Socialism – thus providing the controlling Luciferian Illuminati nutcase elite with the desired dual manipulation ‘Black regime’ tools for the fomentation of the two world wars and the Soviet Revolution et seq.

DOCUMENTARY PROOF OF THE E.U.’S GERMAN NAZI ORIGINS AND INTENT
We can now briefly recapitulate the basic facts confirming that the European Union is an operation of the German Nazis’ Strategic Continuum, bearing in mind that, as will be further explained in a future exposure, German and covert Soviet intelligence work closely together, and always have done (notwithstanding the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact: see the Editor’s latest book, cited above). Documentary proof that the European Union Collective is a Nazi Continuum operation includes:

• Europaische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft, a compendium of seminar papers prepared by the Nazi intelligentsia at a special symposium held in Berlin in 1941, and published there in 1942 by Haude & Spenersche Velagsbuchhandlung Max Paschke, of which a copy exists at the British Library and a copy is also available at the Deutsche Staatsbibliothek (Preussische Staastbibliothek), Berlin. The chapter headings of this document are virtually identical to those of the 1992 Maastricht Treaty, from which the European Constitution Treaty (now the Lisbon Treaty) is derived.

• Under the title ‘Generalplan 1945’, several documents were drawn up by the Nazi planners in the closing days of the Third Reich which were captured by the Allies in 1945. A document within this group, initialled by Grand Admiral Doenitz and Field Marshal Keitel, sketched out a ‘New European Order’ (‘Europaische Friedensordnung’), which is almost indistinguishable from what Dr Konrad Adenauer sold to the gullible and exhausted Allies, as ‘United Europe’.

Dr Adenauer, Germany’s first postwar Chancellor, who was approved by the Allies, was a prewar Mayor of Cologne and a close friend of Hitler’s favourite bankers, Herrn Drs. Abs and Pferdmenges.

A third captured Nazi strategic document, entitled ‘The Overcoming of the Catastrophe’, written by the Nazi High Command, specifically emphasised the solid mutual advantages of a Russo-German alliance against the West. Dr Adenauer later told the Reichstag that this basic secret must ‘never be revealed’ to the Western powers.

Following the orchestrated ‘collapse’ of the Soviet Union and its East European Empire, the cover provided by Soviet Communism that masked the continued existence of the German Nazi Strategic Continuum, was removed. The ‘takedown’ of the USSR was facilitated by American and key foreign intelligence spearheaded by Ambassador Lee Wanta’s brilliant Financial Warfare operations, but was secretly ‘intended’ by the Soviet strategists in order that their known long-range strategy of expanding westwards through the eastwards expansion of the European Union could be realised.

This strategy was explicitly predicted and explained to the CIA by Anatoliy Golitsyn, the famous Soviet defector, in his work ‘The Perestroika Deception‘, edited by this Editor and available from the books section of this website. The CIA, being controlled by the German ‘Black’ Nazi Strategic Continuum, was permanently deaf to Golitsyn’s meticulously documented intelligence.

It has since become clear that East Germany’s notorious STASI secret police apparat was actually a manifestation of the Gestapo dressed in ‘Communist’ clothing, owing secret continuing allegiance to Nazi ‘Black’ counterintelligence (see below).

Well, of course.

THE ‘SCISSORS’ STRATEGY MASTERMINDED BY DEUTSCHE VERTEIDIGUNGS DIENST
This all made it possible for this Editor and others somewhat belatedly to identify the continued existence of the Nazi Abwehr (strategic counterintelligence) operating, quite unbelievably, out of a nondescript building in Dachau, of all notorious locations, near Munich. This ‘Black’ entity is known in intelligence circles as the DVD (Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst). It is the primary engine of the secret long-range ‘SCISSORS’ offensive against ‘the Main Enemy’ – Britain and the United States:

• Against Britain, the DVD’s weapon (or one blade of the Nazi scissors) is the European Union Collective, which has virtually destroyed Britain’s national sovereignty, has severely corrupted the British system of governance, and has decimated the country’s industrial base and infrastructure. German corporations now control significant proportions of British energy and water supplies, while Deutsche Bahn will take over the running of certain railway systems in the near future. In innumerable other ways, which would require far too much explanation here, the EU Collective, derived from the Nazi blueprint, is calculated and designed to DESTROY Britain once and for all.

• Against the United States, the Reinhard Gehlen intelligence organisation (the other blade of the Nazi scissors) which imposed the Nazi jackboot on parts of the Soviet Union, was backed into what became the CIA after the Second World War. The Cold War was essentially invented by Nazi Abwehr General Reinhard Gehlen, and sold to the Americans, who ‘needed’ a pretext to sustain and expand their military-industrial complex. Under ‘Operation Paperclip’, whereby large numbers of Himmler’s scientists and intelligence officers penetrated the new Central Intelligence Agency, buttressed by the National Security Act of 1947 et seq (a crooks’ charter’), the CIA was duly set up to become the notorious instrument of corruption, duplicity and global revolution that we know and loathe today.

Not content with this, the Nazis actually exported Admiral Canaris, the Abwehr head, who surfaced later in Oklahoma City. He was supposed to have been hanged in the nude on 9th April 1945 (a Nazi disinformation fairytale) but resurfaced later in the United States under the name of Samuel Randall Pittmann, travelling regularly back to Germany. Canaris fell ill in 1974 and was briefly substituted for by Dr Henry (‘Henny’) Kissinger, who kept the seat warm for George Herbert Walker Bush, the long-range DVD representative, who replaced William Colby (fired by the late President Gerald Ford) as Director of Central Intelligence (DCI), thereby placing the CIA under the DVD’s direct control.

Langley, the CIA’s headquarters, is known as the George Bush Center for Intelligence, a fact which presupposes that the CIA is perfectly content to be the instrument of the long-range Nazi Strategic Continuum. The Murrah Building in Oklahoma City, bombed in 1995, was the main US depository of Nazi personnel and strategic documentation in the United States.

LONG-RANGE NAZI SUBVERSIVE INFLUENCE-BUILDING OPERATIONS
One of the Nazis’ most lasting long-range postwar strategic deception operations involved the establishment, FOLLOWING THE SUPPOSED NAZI COLLAPSE IN 1945, of innumerable seemingly perfectly innocuous societies and groups, all working in a camouflaged way (‘getarnt’), with the intention, which was successfully realised, of elaborating the Nazi ‘Fuehrermission’ (the ‘global leadership privilege’). This tradition, perpetuated secretly by Deutsche Vertiedigungs Dienst (DVD), Dachau, appears to be alive and well in Davos ‘as we speak’. And before the US State Department weakly succumbed to the blandishments of the insistent pro-German lobby after the War, it clearly understood that the Nazis had a long-range plan which they were capable of implementing.

Specifically, on 30th March 1945, an official State Department release announced as follows:

‘Reliable information collected by Allied Governments clearly indicates that the Nazi regime in Germany has developed well arranged post-war plans for the perpetuation of Nazi doctrines and domination. Some of these plans have already been put into operation and others are ready to be launched on a widespread scale immediately upon termination of hostilities in Europe’.

‘The [US] Government is now in possession of photostatic copies of several volumes of German [postwar] plans… the German propaganda program is to be an integral part of the overall postwar strategy… The program will be expanded and intensified with the object of giving re-birth to all Nazi doctrines and furthering German ambitions for world domination. Unless these plans are checked, they will present a constant menace to postwar peace and security’.

The Nazi postwar plans were not checked, not least because the US State Department was itself penetrated and ‘turned’ by apologists for the Nazis. Accordingly, the Nazi long-range subversion strategy has indeed presented ‘a constant menace to postwar peace and security’, with the ghastly consequences that we observe before us today. Several years ago, in a fit of honesty, an American operative admitted to the Editor of this service that virtually ALL of the world’s problems these days could be attributed to long-range Nazi strategy, and to the CIA’s treacherous collaboration with it.

The prevailing global financial crisis reflects inter alia the shock impact of Wantagate, resolution of which effectively blocks the global fraudulent finance orgy masterminded by the long-term German DVD agent George H. W. Bush Sr. and his partner in giga-crime, Dr Alan Greenspan – who, between them, invented the ‘never-pay’ formula, whereby every ‘rectification’ payment is dependent upon superior layers of payments, so that sabotage of any superior payout blocks all payouts governed by those in higher tiers. By this means, the global ransacking, Ponzi scamming and stealing of base and fiat money funds to generate the open-ended resources with which the perpetrators’ global hegemony plans have been financed, could continue (and have continued) indefinitely.

Until now.

THE NAZI LONG-RANGE PLAN TO CONTROL THE UNITED STATES
German Nazi long-range strategy was summarised in a secret memorandum issued by the German Geopolitical Centre in Madrid, which was established by the Nazi intelligentsia and the Gestapo in 1942. The document, captured by the Allies en route from Madrid to secret Nazi centres in Bonn, Rome, Barcelona, Buenos Aires and South Africa in the early 1950s, and referred to as the Madrid Circular Letter, was labelled ‘SG 23: Top Secret!’. It contained inter alia the following statement:

‘For us the war has never stopped and, as is well known, in war every ruse is permissible’.

This crucial document represented nothing less than a carefully considered blueprint for a ‘new’ German (secret Nazi) approach to dividing and conquering the world – beginning with the ‘Main Enemy’: Britain and the United States.

• For America, the Nazi long-range plan was expressed in the following stark terms:

‘We intend to build the Thousand-Year Reich on the Ruins of the United States’.

The financing of this operation has been presided over by George Bush Sr. (DVD), through his massive financial fraud operations, which he masterminded with the technical assistance of his fellow arch-criminal, Dr Alan Greenspan.

In both the European and the US context, the primary postwar weapons of Nazi subversion have all along been bribery and corruption, on a scale with no historical precedent. These weapons have been buttressed by Himmlerian mind-control and ‘Psy-Ops’ offensives (MK-Ultra-style), elaborated in the Internet era by what we call ‘reverse Goebbelsism’. Dr Josef Goebbels held that a single lie, if repeated often enough, became ‘fact’. The more sophisticated, and even more diabolical, US-CIA Psy-Ops open brainwashing method involves the mass production of diversionary claptrap, behind which smokescreen of confusion the criminal geopoliticians have imagined that they can go about their sordid business with impunity. This Luciferian system is unravelling today before our eyes.

WANTAGATE MAY NOW HAVE FRUSTRATED THE FINAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS NAZI LONG-RANGE OFFENSIVE AGAINST THE U.S. COMPONENT OF THE ‘MAIN ENEMY’, BY JEOPARDISING AND ALSO BLOCKING OFF THE OPEN-ENDED FIAT FINANCING NEEDED TO BRIBE EVERYONE CONSIDERED TO BE LIABLE TO BE STANDING IN THE WAY OF THE THOUSAND-YEAR REICH.

As for secret German-Soviet collaboration (at the intelligence level), ‘The Overcoming of the Catastrophe’ document annexed to the ‘Generalplan’ in Berlin on 5th April 1945, was explicit:

‘The two great peoples, the Russians and the Germans, have extraordinary possibilities for development without collision of their interests. Thus would be formed an alliance between the young Socialist forces against the old rotten entrenched powers of the West’.

Hence it can be seen that the two ‘Socialist forces’ (displayed, for instance, on that early Nazi emblem) are indeed two controlled dialectical, double-minded ‘opposites’ which have the same objectives and think along the same lines.

The Editor does NOT agree with the Nazi General Staff of 1945 that Russia and Germany can collaborate indefinitely ‘without collision of their interests’.

On the contrary, that they must collide is a certainty. This, in turn, is clearly explained in the Editor’s book ‘The European Union Collective‘ [see book section of this website for all cited titles].

But it is sufficient, for the time being, for us to understand, in Britain and America, that we have been taken for a ride, and that we had better hurry up and do something about it, before it is far too late. Resolution of Wantagate, and the associated refinancing of the United States, accompanied by the constraints on fraudulent financial transactions imposed by Basel II against the background of the Wantagate-driven on-the-books settlement, plus the tiered settlements, will greatly assist the United States’ last-minute recovery from the brink of this intended Nazi-originated, prelanned, long-range strategic catastrophe. The Settlement should be followed by a deep purge. ENDS.

YOU CAN ORDER WANTAGATE ISSUES OF OUR FINANCIAL JOURNAL AS A PACKAGE
We sell, as a special package, the relevant recent back issues of International Currency Review, containing a massive amount of information and back-up documentation, for a flat fee of $750.00, payable in advance. Please use the CONTACT US facility to place your order and send check to the London office: World Reports Limited, 108 Horseferry Road, Westminster, London SW1P 2EF, United Kingdom. Orders may also be emailed direct to the Editor at: cstory@worldreports.org.

• Another way of ordering this package is to (a) forward us a CONTACT US email requesting the package, and then (b) to order International Currency Review via the ultra-safe ordering facility at the World Reports Limited section of this website.

• Please state in the CONTACT US facility that you have ordered International Currency Review but that you specifically want to receive the Wantagate package only.

• Editor’s Note: We are still, from time to time, receiving emails from frustrated people seeking documentation to ‘back up’ what we publish in these reports. Such correspondents choose to overlook the well-known fact that we have published several huge issues of International Currency Review [SEE ABOVE] which contain hundreds of pages of facsimiles of relevant documents. Since we are a commercial operation, we cannot make these volumes available free of charge.

• However copies are available in many university and other libraries around the world, and of course they can be ordered via this website at any time. But the main point here is that complaints along these lines reveal lack of knowledge of the background, which is that an immense volume of relevant documents has been published, while these reports are approved where necessary and appropriate either by the Principals or by Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., before being posted.

LEGAL SECTION:
PLEASE READ THIS INFORMATION, AS IT INDICATES THE DEPTH OF THE DEPRAVITY THAT WANTAGATE HAS EXPOSED. REPETITION OF THIS BASIC DATA IS STILL NECESSARY…

• We now repeat, yet again, our familiar summary of the Statutes, securities regulations and fraud information that we have appended to these reports for many months. The reason we append this information is to remind everyone of their clear responsibilities under the US Misprision of Felony legislation, and of course to provide a legal basis for these reports.

LEGAL RECAPITULATION FROM REPORT DATED 30TH AUGUST 2007:
Reiteration of the fraudulent transactions involving Bank of New York Mellon – a bank so arrogant and conspicuously indifferent both to its tarnished reputation and to its grotesque breaches of US law and of N.A.S.D./S.E.C. Regulations, that it now takes first prize in the crowded competition for the title of ‘Most arrogant and corrupt financial institution in America’. At least, this was the case until the perpetration of the ‘Saturday scam’ described above and on 13th November:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• ‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON IS IN BREACH AND OF WHICH THE SIX ‘LEVY BANKS’ MAY LIKEWISE BE VARIOUSLY IN BREACH [CREDIT SUISSE, UBS, DEUTSCHE BANK, BANK OF AMERICA, CITIBANK, THE BANK OF ENGLAND]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is in violation of:
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR SIR LEO WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT THE HIGHEST U.S. LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006, AND HAVE CONTINUED THEIR SERIAL CRIMES EVER SINCE:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war

This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Wanta’s funds.

The Directors and others listed in Part 1 of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and others posted on 11th June may likewise be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious violation of the laws itemised above. This list is reproduced in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, September 2007, on pages 163-168.

U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: MISPRISION OF FELONY:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

Wicked Pedia Update dated 2nd December 2007:

WIKIPEDIA IS PART OF AN NSA DISCREDITING OPERATION
As previously reported, the Editor’s attention was drawn, in the second half of November 2007, to a pack of old lies, diversionary claptrap and disinformation posted on Wikipedia under ‘Leo Wanta’.

Although this posting appeared FOR THE FIRST TIME on 12th November 2007, it consisted almost entirely of ancient lies, including disinformation dredged out of ‘Thieves’ World’, a hatchet job published in 1994 by Simon and Schuster by the late Claire Sterling, a CIA operative.

Mrs Sterling died suddenly after being summoned for her second meeting with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, under Clinton.

ANCIENT DISCREDITED LIES POSTED IN NOVEMBER 2007
The fact that the OLD Wikipedia lies appeared for the first time as late as 12th November 2007, and consisted almost totally of old, discredited lies, omitting the Master Lie that the CIA retailed after the Ambassador had been taken down, namely that he was DEAD, indicated quite clearly to the Editor and his advisers that this latest evil display of regurgitated disinformation represented a deliberate operation by the US intelligence community’s disinformation and lie machine, to begin, all over again, the process of discrediting Ambassador Leo Wanta – so that they can relieve him of his funds by some false pretext or other after a ‘gag order’ has been signed.

The definitive up-to-date information on the Ambassador’s affairs has been published on this website, and in several issues of International Currency Review, Economic Intelligence Review, Soviet Analyst and Arab-Asian Affairs, all published by World Reports Limited, for several years. Copies of these publications are in official, institutional and library hands all over the world. Therefore, any posting about Ambassador Wanta that relies upon ancient lies and fails to take account of the accurate information that we have published, can easily be demonstrated to represent yet another US intelligence community and NSA discrediting operation.

PRELUDE TO ‘SETTING UP’ WANTA ALL OVER AGAIN
We now understand that the Principals have been advised (for the past several weeks) that they will not be allowed to reveal that they have been paid. This loony state of affairs is designed to ‘set them up’ for a future discrediting operation whereby false witness will be deployed against them to the effect that they have stolen the money, or some such pack of lies, which they will be unable to refute because they will be bound by the ‘prerequisite’ gag order that is intended. Its purpose, of course, is to ‘legitimise’ the old and new lies that the US disinformation apparat will be preparing for future use. The likelihood is that the new discrediting operation will be extended to Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., as well. We are prepared for this intended onslaught.

EDITOR’S TRUE REPORT REPEATEDLY REPLACED BY OLD LIES
On 19th November, the Editor posted on Wikipedia the accurate text about Leo Wanta that is now reproduced below. The Editor’s accurate text was then removed by Wikipedia, leaving the ‘old lies’ that had existed previously. When the Editor became aware of this, he reposted the accurate text below, and, given that his own copy had been deleted, he then deleted the pack of lies, leaving his own accurate text up on the Wikipedia site instead, without the lies.

On 2nd December, the Editor was advised by a monitor that the Editor’s accurate text had been removed and that the old discrediting lies had been reposted on the page by Wikipedia. When the Editor checked, he found that the page could no longer be edited because of what the site managers described as ‘vandalism’.

IT’S ‘VANDALISM’ TO POST THE TRUTH, NOT ‘VANDALISM’ TO POST LIES
It was not ‘vandalism’ to delete the truth and to replace the truth by old lies, but it was ‘vandalism’ to delete ‘old lies’ and replace them by the truth.

We are therefore able to conclude from this Wicked Pedia outrage, as follows:

1. Wikipedia, which purports to ‘change the world’, prefers lies to the truth.

2. Wikipedia is therefore, by definition, a source of disinformation and lies, and cannot be trusted as a source of reliable information in any context.

3. The only category of sick society that would have any interest in disseminating lies about Ambassador Wanta, the United States’ greatest living patriot, rather than the truth, is the mentally disturbed US counterintelligence disinformation apparat (a.k.a. the US STUPIDITY COMMUNITY) which, by its actions in deleting the Editor’s ACCURATE information and replacing it with old lies, and by its illegal behaviour in ‘snipping’ our website texts as stated above, thereby reveals the desperation of its concerns, which all have to do with covering up official criminality.

4. It is now far too late for the US stupidity community to repair the damage that it has done since June 2006, when the Ambassador’s funds were first hijacked by the criminal financial operative Henry M. Paulson, US Treasury Secretary. So it is laying the groundwork for a renewed discrediting operation against Ambassador Wanta and his colleagues.

• We and others will see to it that this intention is defeated, and that such nefarious scheming is exposed for the amoral and disgusting Luciferian behaviour that it represents.

The ACCURATE text that the Editor posted on the Wikipedia site, follows. (The Editor, after all, PAID FOR AMBASSADOR WANTA’S EXIT FROM PROBATION, FOR GOODNESS SAKE, SO HE CAN HARDLY BE A SOURCE OF DISINFORMATION, CAN HE?). This information will be very widely distributed by other means, in order to provide all concerned with the necessary ‘heads-up’ as to what these US Dark Forces have in mind. They are out of their minds and in Satan’s mind:

The disinformation about Leo Wanta (Lee Wanta) below was first posted on 12th November 2007. It contains ancient CIA disinformation and long since exposed lies going back to the early 1990s, and obfuscates the truth. The report appended immediately below was added on 19th November 2007, to correct the disinformation contained in the original stub.

It was subsequently removed and is hereby replaced. This sequence of events, which suggests that egregious lies are preferred to the truth, has been recorded on www.worldreports.org, which contains all the updated and breaking Wanta material, that was ignored and traduced in the stub at the foot of this report.

THE ACCURATE TEXT THAT WIKIPEDIA REPEATEDLY DELETED
This is the correct information that we posted on 19th November 2007:

The ‘information’ posted below represents a deliberately malevolent, false disinformation picture which has no bearing on reality. It is a travesty of the truth of the matter and cites Christopher Story as the author of some of the disinformation, which is libellous and implies that Story, the veteran
Editor of International Currency Review of nearly 40 years’ standing, is engaged in the egregious dissemination of lies, which is not the case.

This is such an egregiously malevolent stub of disinformation that readers should prudently dismiss it altogether; they should start afresh by accessing Christopher Story‘s website, which is: www.worldreports.org., reading from the Archive.

www.worldreports.org is the authoritative source for all updated information on Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta. The source ‘Thieves’ World’ was a CIA disinformation work prepared by the late CIA disinformation operative Claire Sterling, published in 1994.

This stub regurgitates ancient lies perpetrated by the CIA, which lied for many years that Lee (Leo being his intelligence community name) Wanta was dead. The CIA proclaimed that he was dead so that corrupt cadres could ransack his funds (see below).

He ‘ceased to be dead’ with effect from 21st July 2005 after Christopher Story, a British private citizen, had paid $35,000 from his scarce private funds pro bono publico by way of ‘restitution’ to an American lawyer for onward payment to the Wisconsin State Department of Corrections, to procure Mr Wanta’s release from his illegal probation.

Despite his Ambassadorial status, Wanta had been illegally ‘taken down’ in Switzerland on 7th July 1993 without a warrant on a trumped-up Wisconsin State charge of having failed to pay $14,129 in falsely assessed Wisconsin State fabricated tax that he never owed because he had been resident in Vienna on US Presidential intelligence work since June 1988.

This data is all in the public domain, has been published for several years in International Currency Review, the Journal of the World Financial Community, and can be read on Mr Story’s website.

International Currency Review is a banking and financial journal with a worldwide circulation:
ISSN 0020-6490. It is published by World Reports Limited, London.

Notwithstanding that this fabricated tax demand (orchestrated by US criminal intelligence) had been paid twice under protest by Lee Emil Wanta from abroad (in May and June 1992), the funds were improperly allocated by the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue and were never credited to the false account maintained by them for the Ambassador. (Christopher Story holds documentary
proof of both payments). They were paid a third time by Christopher Story in June 2005, which action duly procured Mr Wanta’s release from illegal probation effective 14th November 2005.

As a consequence of Wanta thus ceasing to be dead, the CIA’s lie that he was dead collapsed in chaos, and all the subsidiary old false witness lies that the CIA had perpetrated, including those assembled for disinformation purposes in the stub below (which, in line with the standard false witness used throughout by detractors, attempts to portray Christopher Story as a source of disinformation) were discredited as well.

Why was Wanta taken down? So that the criminal intelligence cadres running the US Government could ransack the $27.5 trillion of funds assembled by Leo Wanta on President Reagan’s orders, in the course of his Financial Warfare operations against the USSR.

Under Reagan’s Executive Order 12333 of 1981, US intelligence officers were permitted to establish corporations which could thereafter contract with the CIA/DIA/DEA/NSA et al for the purpose of fulfilling allotted intelligence tasks allocated to them.

The financial proceeds of operations conducted by such corporations were consequently the property of the corporations and thus of their shareholders, a legal fact of life which has never been, and cannot be, disputed. This was not a good idea because almost all US intelligence
operatives are liars and do not function on the basis of the Rule of Law at all, if they can help it.

Lee Wanta is the well-known patriotic exception to this rule: he operates solely in accordance with US law, in contrast to the behaviour of other US operatives, which is why the kakocracy* needed to remove him from the scene, as duly occurred July 1993.

Once Wanta had been illegally arrested (contrary to international law, as a diplomat) and then thrown into a stinking Swiss jail on 7th July 1993, the criminal cadres inside the US official structures immediately ransacked Mr Wanta’s bank accounts according to plan.

The history of this matter is, and has been, elaborated in great depth on Christopher Story‘s website www.worldreports.org. and has been extensively published, as mentioned, in International Currency Review and other World Reports Limited intelligence publications.

Students are advised perhaps to begin with the ‘Wisconsingate’ report dated 6th August 2007, which forensically dissects, with detailed documentary back-up, the Wisconsin Department of Revenue’s tax fabrication operation against Wanta, stretching back for over 20 years, that has been exposed by Christopher Story in minute detail, and which formed the fabricated basis for Wanta’s illegal takedown in 1993, despite the fact that Wisconsin has no jurisdiction beyond its borders.

The overall Wantagate crisis, which is the sole and continuing underlying cause of the prevailing global financial and economic day of reckoning that the world is now facing, has been triggered by the fact that the George W. Bush Jr. White House, aided and abetted by other senior office-holders, hijacked the compromise financial settlement of $4.5 trillion that the White House itself agreed (in a classified accord that was finalised in May 2006) should be paid over to Ambassador Wanta, so that the stolen and diverted remaining $23 trillion of his funds (and the many hundreds of trillions of dollars hypothecated upon them) could be released from a de facto lien arising from the collapse of the CIA’s lie that Wanta was dead.

For clearly, since he had ceased to be dead, 100% of these funds (plus the hundreds of trillions of fiat ‘funny’ money generated by illegal leveraged operations from that base) belonged to Lee Wanta and to no-one else: a situation that the banks ‘could not handle’.

The entire narrative of what has become the worst financial corruption crisis in world history (which this stub consisting of disinformation attempts to obfuscate) is set out in great detail on Christopher Story‘s website www.worldreports.org., to which all readers are directed in order for the accurate state of affairs to be understood. As indicated, this stub below is a travesty and a disgrace, as it regurgitates long since discredited CIA lies, presents a diversionary, distorted and misleading picture, and because it malevolently incorporates Christopher Story as a source for some of this disinformation.

It is a disgusting instance of ignorant and malevolent US counterintelligence disinformation and deceit at its very worst.

All the statements in the above commentary may be verified by reference to www.worldreports.org and International Currency Review. Another publication covering this matter in detail is Economic Intelligence Review, also published by World Reports Limited, London. Wanta students should access the Archive on the www.worldreports.org Home Page.

A book devoted to Ambassador Wanta and the Wantagate crisis is in preparation

The Wanta disinformation referred to above has been deleted from this page. ENDS.

DIPLOMATIC STATUS OF THE PRINCIPALS
The Ambassador and his colleagues now have special diplomatic status (conferred upon them by HM The Queen in 2007), which means that the Ambassador is now an Ambassador several times over. This factor greatly complicates the intended discrediting offensive that the mad US stupidity community’s Dark Forces contemplate, their sole objective being of course to cover up their own criminality, in line with pending ‘thought crime’ legislation which has the same Nazi-style objective.

*Note: ‘Kakocracy’: Governance by a clique representing the worst elements of society, in their interests and to the exclusion of all other interests, from the Greek, kakos, meaning foul, or filthy.

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier Wantagate reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

GLOBAL DATA THEFT OPERATION BY THE CRIMINAL CADRES

ANOTHER ELEMENT OF THE WORLD REVOLUTION EXPOSED

Saturday 5 January 2008 17:41

BRITISH AUTHORITIES CAUGHT UP IN THIS WEB OF CRIMINALITY

DIRECTED BY CRIMINAL CADRES, PROBABLY BASED IN TEXAS

POINDEXTER’S ‘TOTAL AWARENESS PROGRAM’ IMPLEMENTED VIA GLOBAL THEFT

THE COUNTER-REVOLUTION MUST GET A GRIP ON WHAT IT IS UP AGAINST

• SEE 26TH DECEMBER REPORT FOR FINANCIAL FRAUDS BEHIND THE ‘SUBPRIME’ CRISIS

• The report dated 2nd January 2008 is accessible, along with all the earlier Wantagate reports since April 2006, in the Archive. It has not been changed. Further shootings have taken place and the bloodbath that we predicted in these reports, arising from the fact that the ruthless criminal cadres refuse to relinquish the funds that they have stolen, is continuing. ‘Eliminations’ are known also to be taking place all over the world, but it is not known how long this phase of the de facto counter-revolution will last, or even whether it will escalate into war (as has, of late, reportedly been hinted at by some of the aggrieved ‘country’ payees).

Our expectation is that brutal steps are and will continue to be taken and that there will be no let-up in the tension for some time. To give just one example of how evil these people are, funds have been stolen within the banks even AFTER the shootings that have been reported to date.

The report appended here exposes ANOTHER dimension of the Fascist assault on civilisation.

It does not mean that we will not be reverting to other matters at the appropriate time. It means that now is the time to make it clear how IMMENSE is the criminalist offensive against us all, and why no further delay in mounting the ongoing de facto counter-revolution could have been tolerated.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for ‘Wantagate’ reports since April 2006. [Note: A new panel giving details of our latest publications as they are made available, has been added].

• Please Make a Donation to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing financial global corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial corruption and global financial crisis in history. This website has been calling the shots, because of the hijacking of Wanta’s Settlement.

THE DATA THEFT DIMENSION IS NOT ‘ACCIDENTAL’: THIS IS AN ORCHESTRATED OFFENSIVE
This report addresses a hitherto obscured dimension of the criminalists’ headlong revolutionary offensive to steal and acquire by all possible nefarious means the assets of others, everywhere: in this category, by means of data theft. The notion that the data theft epidemic is just happenstance is as naive as the notion, lodged in some people’s minds, that the developments that we have had to report in these postings ‘can’t be true’. There is no difference between this complacent mentality and that of Western populations in the 1930s and 1940s, who chose to believe that the Holocaust could not be ‘for real’, just because the crimes alleged were so ‘inconceivable’ and horriffic.

MASSIVE DATA THEFT OFFENSIVE IN EVIDENCE
The Editor of this service, having identified a body of data giving details of MASSIVE ongoing theft of computerised information, proceeded to manipulate the data from its somewhat disorganised state, to observe whether any clear patterns would emerge.

By reorganising all the information into alphabetical order, the Editor discovered a truly horrifying display of identity theft which has been taking place on such a huge scale that it can only represent a coordinated criminal operation. This is such a massive undertaking that we are certain it is being orchestrated by the World Revolution. The data displayed in alphabetical order below represents reported thefts of computerised data reported in the public domain in 2006 and 2007 alone.

It is understood that the British Parliament has taken a dim view of the multiple lapses of care that components of the decadent British official structures have allowed to occur in recent months. It is also clear from the relevant reports that MPs have absolutely no clue what they have been talking about. They appear to have assumed that the observed thefts of confidential data have arisen due to carelessness, stupidity, laziness, or all of the above. The ONE cause of this epidemic that they have omitted to consider is that it is AN ORCHESTRATED OPERATION.

Okay, most of these MPs have no inkling that we are in the midst of a hectic phase of the World Revolution. But taking such clear ignorance as a given, surely SOMEONE in Parliament has the brains to think outside the box, and to ask the question: Could these data thefts be orchestrated? The answer, which is glaringly evident from the huge list of data thefts shown below, is that THAT MUST BE THE ONLY EXPLANATION.

While on the subject of the failings of UK Government structures, we suggest that someone in authority in Whitehall (who is not corrupt) should take a look at ‘contractors’ like ED and Entrust, and should ask themselves whether there may be a possibility that such organisations may have a criminal dimension, i.e. may be covers inter alia for data theft, which opens up multiple scamming opportunities for the criminal cadres affiliated with the World Revolution (in case you didn’t know, that’s the way it is). It would be no earthly use the Editor contacting Whitehall mandarins about this, because they always know better than ‘outsiders’. That’s why we mention this point here.

THE EPIDEMIC OF CRIMINAL IDENTITY THEFT
In November 2007, HM Customs & Excise was roundly criticised for allowing the personal details of 25 million UK files to vanish en route from an office in the northeast of England, to the National Audit Office in Central London. What was not mentioned in the many press reports on this subject was that TNT, which provides the ‘internal’ courier service for the tax and customs authority, is under Dutch ownership, and that Dutch organised crime is prominent in data and identity theft.

The Editor thought of informing HM Customs and Excise of this specific knowledge, but since on an earlier occasion when he had attempted to provide that entity with detailed information about the criminality of a foreign tax authority he had received no response, he decided not to bother.

Why waste time trying to get bovine UK tax officials to understand that they are being targeted by organised crime, and that this data theft was NO ACCIDENT, he thought – and then got on with other matters. When confidence in governance slumps to the depths of demoralisation prevalent in Britain today, the citizen retains little incentive to provide the authorities with the benefit of his knowledge of what may be going on in a sector in which he is qualified to provide assistance.

Rather than adopt that course, therefore, the Editor has obtained a body of data theft intelligence that is in the public domain but which, crucially, was presented for public consumption in such a manner that no clear pattern of criminal activity could be observed. When these tell-tale data were manipulated, however, a truly horrifying picture emerged, as shown below.

ELECTRONIC ‘TEMPEST’ ATTACKS AS DATA WAS BEING MANIPULATED
While the Editor was organising this data for two of our print publications, severe and previously never experienced electronic interference with what the Editor was then doing overwhelmed the computer system and screen. Specifically, whenever the Editor came to a military entry, all of a sudden the screen and image became unstable and vacillated violently, before vanishing from the point at which text had not been saved.

Our system saves every 0.25 of a minute, and the Editor is also in the habit of saving inputted data to separate media frequently. With the assistance of data sticks and his separate hard drives, the Editor preserved all the saved work and every time these attacks happened, over the space of nearly two days, the data was retrieved and placed back onto the template.

The paranoid and duplicitous US intelligence community, which notoriously operates on the basis of lies and deception, in accordance with the deception model established in the 19th century by Stieber in Prussia and through him, in Russia, and which had been elaborated from known Jesuit procedures, is in the habit of clumsily blowing its cover all the time.

By signalling so blatantly that where the Editor was going with this data was ‘not appreciated’, the cadres concerned had revealed to the Editor that what he was doing with the data – reorganising it and placing it in alphabetical order, a tedious process that took at least a day and a half – would be likely to reveal some interesting information.

And so it has proved. They shot themselves in the foot, didn’t they?

Hence we are hereby able to reveal a truly horrendous identity theft offensive, which is of such immense proportions that it can ONLY be the work of malevolent (criminal) intelligence cadres, who are the only Dark Forces with the (stolen) resources to mount an operation as huge as this.

And since, while the Editor was in the very act of manipulating the data into alphabetical order, signals were being directed to the Editor (by electronic intervention means, or via successive TEMPEST attacks) that confirmed his suspicions on this score, we attach the gravest importance to what is revealed. This may be our most alarming background exposure to date.

CONTROL THROUGH ELECTRONIC IMPULSES
It is crystal clear from this reformatted data that the criminal enterprise known as the Central Intelligence Agency and its subsidiary intelligence entities are engaged in a concerted data theft operation, coordinated with organised crime, which is intended to provide access to the personal affairs of as many targeted individuals and organisations as can be handled, worldwide.

This colossal operational offensive is being (or has been) run in parallel with the vast fraudulent finance and theft epidemic which has been the main subject of these reports for the past twenty months. Identity theft is being developed on this gargantuan scale in order to yield innumerable data-mined ‘benefits’ for criminal intelligence, for organised crime and the ‘Black’ components of the Illuminati (there are certain Illuminati groups that are benevolent, which sounds like a contradiction in terms, but it’s true).

But first, examination of the data will reveal a significant concentration on hospitals, services for children and young people, services by extension (and specifically) for old people, and the military.

Why should this be the case?

Hospitals are targets because information on the deceased is of priority concern to the criminal cadres, so that corrupt professional advisers handling estates and bereaved family members, can be activated. Where elderly people are likely to perish due to Alzheimer’s (induced by aspartame, a chemical sweetener promoted by the war criminal Donald Rumsfeld, which has the ‘advantage’ that old people can be persuaded to hand over their assets to criminal operatives in the nursing and medical professions), their assets and estates are coveted.

Very young children and babies are targets for identity theft following bust-ups between parents, fomented by the strains imposed on relationships by the permissive society, which has itself been fostered by the ‘Black’ intelligence community serving the interests of the World Revolution.

Stolen identities are then used for real estate and other fraudulent documentation purposes. Affiliated crime families such as the Sucato Crime Family and the East Valley Group in Arizona are heavily involved. Phoenix, AZ, is an Illuminati centre: hence its name. Massive real estate frauds based on identity theft are resident there.

Thefts of military data, including identity thefts, have obvious national security implications.

• Abbreviations:
DOB: Date of Birth
SSN: Social Security Number (US)
NIN: National Insurance Number (UK)

DATA AND IDENTITY FRAUDS AND THEFTS MONITORED IN 2006 AND 2007:

• A. J. Falciani Realty Co. (NJ), Nov 2007. 500-1000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• ABN Amro Mortgage Co., Sep 2007, 5,000 SSNs, DOBs, Data leak
• Academic Magnet High School, Charleston, SC, Dec 2006,
Hundreds personal data files, Physical theft
•Adams State College, Sep 2006, 184 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Administaff, Oct 2007, 159,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Aetna Apr 2006, 38,000, SSNs, other data, Physical theft
• Aetna/Concentra Preferred Systems, Dec 2006, 130,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• AFLAC, Aug 2006, 162 SSNs, DOBs, police information, Physical theft
• AFLAC, Jul 2007, 152,000 Japanese customers’ Policy numbers, DOBs, Physical theft
• Alabama Medicaid/EDS, Aug 2007, 498 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Allina Hospitals and Clinics, Oct 2006, 14,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Allstate, Huntsville, AL, June 2006, Unknown insurance information, Physical theft
• American Airlines, Jun 2007 300 pilots, other employees, SSNs, DOBs, Data leak
• American Education Services, Jul 2007, 5,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• American Ex-Prisoners of War, Aug 2007, 35,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• American Family Insurance, Sep 2006, More than 2,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• American Institute of CPAs, May 2006, 330,000 SSNs, DOBs, Loss of hardware
• American International Group (AIG)/Medical Excess LLC, Mar 2006 930,000 SSNs,
Medical information, Physical theft
• American Red Cross, Mar 2006, 8,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• American Red Cross, Texas, Jun 2005, Unknown DOBs, medical information, Physical theft
• American Red Cross, Texas, May 2006, Unknown DOBs, medical information, Physical theft
• Ameriprise Financial, Inc., Jan. 2006 226,000 SSNs, financial data, Physical theft
• Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield, Jan 2007, 50,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Arizona Biodyne (Blue Cross/Blue Shield), Jul 2005, 57,000 SSNs, medical data, Physical theft
•Armstrong World Industries, July 2006 12,000 SSNs, financial data, Physical theft
• AT&T, Aug 2007, Unknown SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• AT&T, Aug 2006, 19,000 Credit card numbers, other financial data, Hacking
• Athens (GA) Regional Health Service, Oct 2007 1,441 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Atlantis Resorts (Bahamas), Jan 2006, 55,000 SSNs, credit data, Physical theft
• Automated Data Processing (ADP), July 2006,
Hundreds of thousands of clients’ financial data, Leak
• Baltimore County Department of Health, Apr 2007, 6,000 DOBs, SSNs, Physical theft
• Bank of America, Apr 2007, Unknown DOBs, SSNs, Physical theft
• Bank of America, Dec 2006, Unknown SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
•Bank of America, Wachovia, Commerce Bancorp, PNC Bank NA, May 2005,
676,000 bank accounts compromised, Hacking
• Bank of Montreal, Sep 2006, financial information on 900 clients, Physical theft
• Bank of Scotland, May 2007, 62,000 Mortgage account numbers, DOBs, Physical theft
• Battelle & Battelle LLC, Ohio Nov 2007, 600 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Belhaven College, Jul 2006, 300 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Birmingham Veterans Medical Center, May 2007, Unknown SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Bisys Group, Inc., July 2006 61,000 hedge fund investors’ SSNs and financial data, Physical theft
• Boeing, Apr. 2006, 3,600 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Boeing, Dec 2006, 382,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Boeing, Nov 2005 161,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Bowling Green State University, Jun 2007 199 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Brock University, Canada, Oct 2006, 70,000 credit card and bank account numbers, Hacking
• Bronx VA Hospital, SSNs, other data, Physical theft
• Buckeye Community Health Plan, Ohio, June 2006, 72,000 SSNs, medical data, Physical theft
• Butte Community Bank, Nov 2007, Unknown SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Butte County, California, Nov 2006, Electronic voting machine data, Physical theft
• Cal State, Los Angeles, Nov 2006, 2,534 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Calgary Health Region, Nov 2006, Personal and medical data on 1,000 children, Physical theft
• California Department of Health Services, May 2005, 21,600 SSNs, medical data, Physical theft
• California Department of Mental Health, Aug 2006, 9,468 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• California National Guard, Jan 2006, Hundreds of Guardsmen’s SSNs, other data, Physical theft
• California National Guard, San Diego Naval Base, Feb 2007, 1,300 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Talvest Fund, Jan 2007,
Personal financial data on 470,000 clients, Physical theft
• Cape Fear Health System, June 2006, 24,350 SSNs, Medical data, Physical theft
• Capistrano School District, CA, Oct 2006, Unknown SSNs, DOBs Physical theft
• Capital Health, Edmonton, Alberta, Aug 2007, 20,000, Health Card Numbers, DOBs, Physical theft
• Carnegie Mellon University, Oct 2007, Unknown SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Carolinas Medical Center-NorthEast, Nov 2007, 28,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Caterpillar, Inc., Apr 2007, Unknown DOBs, SSNs, Physical theft
• Census Bureau, Apr 2007, 30,000 SSNs, Leak
• Chevron, Aug 2006, 29,000 SSNs, DOBs, Financial data, Physical theft
• Chicago Board of Elections, Jan 2007, 1,300,000 SSNs, Missing CDs
• Chicago Public Schools, Apr 2007, 40,000 DOBs, SSNs, Physical theft
• ChildNet, Broward County, Forida, Child welfare services, Apr 2007,
12,000 DOBs, SSNs, Physical theft
• Children’s Health Council, Palo Alto, Sep 2005 6,000 SSNs, Medical data Physical theft
• Children’s Hospital, Akron, OH, Oct 2006, 200,000 SSNs, DOBs, Hacking
• Choice Point, Feb 2006, 150,000 Subscribers’ data, Leak
• Cingular Wireless, July 2006, Unknown corporate data, Physical theft
• City National Bank, Louisiana, Jul 2005, unknown SSNs, Financial data, Physical theft
• City of Columbus, Ohio, Sep 2007, 3,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi, June 2006, 23,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• City of Virginia Beach, Jul 2007, 2,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• City of Wickliffe, Ohio, Dec 2006, 125 SSNs, DOBs, Hacking
• City University of New York, Oct 2007, 20,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Cleveland Air Route Traffic Control Center, Oct 2006, 400 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Cleveland State University, Jun 2005, 44,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Coastal Community Credit Union, Jun 2007, 120,000 DOBs, SSNs, Physical theft
• Colorado Department of Human Services/Affiliated Computer Systems (ACS), Oct 2006,
Unknown SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Colorado State Health Department, May 2005, 1,600 families’ SSNs, Medical data, Physical theft
• Columbus Bank & Trust, May 2006, Credit card data on 2,000 clients, Physical theft
• Commerce Bank, Nov 2007, Unknown SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Compass Health, June 2006, Unknown SSNs, DOBs, Other personal data, Physical theft
• Concordia Hospital, Jun 2007, 3,000 DOBs, SSNs, Physical theft
• Connecticut Department of Revenue Services, Aug 2007, 100,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Connors State College, Nov 2006, 22,500 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Cricket Communications, Jul 2007, 300 Credit card numbers, Physical theft
• CS Stars, July 2006, 540,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• CTS Tax Service, Feb 2007, 800 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• CUSO Mortgage Co., May 2006, 1,695 SSNs, DOBs, Financial data, Hacking
• Cuyahoga County, Jul 2007, 3,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• DCH Health Systems, Apr 2007, 6,000 DOBs, SSNs, Physical theft
• Deaconess Hospital, Indiana, Dec 2006, 128 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Deloitte & Touche, Feb 2006, 9,000 McAfee employees’ SSNs, Financial data, Physical theft
• Denver Election Commission, June 2006, 150,000 Voters’ records, Physical theft
• DePaul Medical Center, Norfolk, VA, Sep 2006, Over 100 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Devon and Cornwall Police, UK, Reported 27th Dec 2007, Confidential information on employees, including telephone numbers, ranks and qualifications, lost at a center in Exeter by a man who had been ‘looking for spare computer parts’ after a computer was sent for recyclying. The man who found the data, a 48-year-old engineer, told The Sun newspaper: ‘People often fail to wipe their details before dumping computers but this is something else. I loaded the disc out of curiosity and was horrified by what I found’.
• Disney Movie Club, Jul 2007, Unknown credit card numbers, Physical theft
• Dixie State College, Oct 2007, 11,000 SSNs, DOBs, Hacking
• Dollar Tree, Jul 2006, 1,000 ATM PINs, Hacking
• Dominion Resources, Aug 2006, Unknown SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Eastern Illinois University, Jan. 2007, 1,400 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Eden Project,Cornwall, UK, Jun 2007, 500 DOBs, NINs, Physical theft
• Empire Blue Cross, Mar 2007, 75,000 SSNs, DOBs, Medical data, Physical theft
• Eon, Jul 2007, 3,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Equifax, May 2006, 2,500 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Erlanger Hospital, TN, Sep 2006, 4,150 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Ernst & Young, Feb 2006, Unknown SSNs, financial data, Physical theft
• Ernst & Young, Mar 2006, Thousands of records on IBM employees, SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Jun 2005, 6,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Federal Motor Carriers Safety Administration/DOT, Aug 2006, 193 commercial driver’s license numbers, DOBs, Physical theft
• Federal Trade Commission, June 2006, 1,100 FTC employees’ SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Fidelity National Information Services, Jul 2007,
2,300,000 SSNs, DOBs, No information about nature of scandal
• First Response Finance, UK, Aug 2007,
Personal data on ‘thousands’ of customers, Physical theft
• First Trust Bank, Dec 2005, Thousands of SSNs, financial data, Physical theft
• Florida International University, May 2006, Thousands of SSNs, DOBs, Hacking
• Florida National Guard, Sep 2006, 100 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Florists’ Mutual Insurance Company (Hortica), Apr 2007, unknown DOBs, SSNs, Physical theft
• Foothill-De Anza College, Aug 2007, 3,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Ford Motor Company, Dec 2005, 70,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Fraser Health Authority, British Columbia, Apr 2006, Thousands of SINs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Fresno County, May 2007, 10,000 DOBs, SSNs, Physical theft
• Gap Inc., Sep 2007 800,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Geisinger Health Systems, Dec 2006,25,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• General Electric, Sep 2006, ‘Thousands of SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Georgetown University, Feb 2006, 41,000 elderly DC residents’ SSNs, DOBs, Hacking
• Georgia Department of Community Health/Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., Apr 2007
2,900,000 DOBs, SSNs, Physical theft
• Georgia Technology Authority, Mar 2006, 570,000 SSNs, DOBs, Hacking
• Germanton Elementary School, Oct 2006, Unknown SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Grand Valley State University, Jun 2007, 3,000 DOBs, SSNs, Physical theft
• Greater Media, Boston, Nov 2006, Unknown SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Greenville County, NC, School District, Jan 2007,
‘Thousands’ of SSNs, DOBs, temporarily ‘missing’
• Group Health Cooperative Health Care System, Washington State, Mar 2007,
31,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Gulf Coast Medical Center, Feb 2007, 9900 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Gymboree, Oct 2006, 20,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Halifax Bank, UK, Mar 2007, 13,000 Mortgage, financial data, Physical theft
• Hancock Askew & Co., Oct 2006, Unknown SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Hanford Nuclear Reservation, June 2006, 4,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Harrison County (NV) Schools, Jun 2007, Unknown SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Hartford Financial Services Group, Oct 2007, 230,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• HCA, Inc., Aug 2006, ‘Thousands’ of SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
•Hewlett-Packard/Fidelity Investments, Mar 2006, 196,000 SSNs, other data, Physical theft
• Highland Hospital, Rochester, NY, May 2007, 13,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Highland University, Jul 2007 420 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• HM Revenue & Customs, UK, Dec 2007, Report that HMRC continues complacently to demand and receive details of personal investments of 9 million people on unencrypted media by post, despite recent scandalous data losses
• HM Revenue & Customs, UK, Nov 2007, 25,000,000 NINs, DOBs, Physical theft
• HM Revenue & Customs, UK, Oct 2007,Financial data on 400 taxpayers, Physical theft
• HM Revenue & Customs, UK, Nov 2007, loss of disc sent to Standard Life containing names, addresses, DOBs, pension details and NINs on thousands of pensioners
• HM Revenue & Customs, UK, Nov 2007, 15,000 NINs, DOBs, Physical theft
• HM Revenue & Customs, UK, 21st Nov 2007, Tax officials who lost the personal and banking details of everyone receiving child benefit also revealed to have presided over 2,111security breaches in 2006 alone, including the loss of 41 laptops
• HM Customs & Excise, UK, 21st Nov 2007, Staff at tax offices in Washington, Tyne and Wear, sent two further unencrypted discs containing National insurance Numbers and date of birth, password that will unlock the personal details may have been included in the missing package
• HM Revenue & Customs, Sep 2007, Laptop stolen from a tax official’s car, containing thousands of customer details from 15 financial institutions
• Home Depot, Oct 2007, 10,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Hospital for Sick Children, Ontario, Canada, Feb 2007, Unknown medical data, Physical theft
• Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Aug 2007, 3,300 DOBs, medical data, Physical theft
• Hotels.com, Feb 2006, Credit card information on 243,000 customers, Physical theft
Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin (Law firm), San Francisco, Sep 2006, 500 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Humana Medicare Program, June 2006, 17,000 SSNs, DOBs,
• Medical information, Possible compromise
• Humana Medicare Program, May 2006,
250 Medicare applicants, Paper applications, Physical theft
• IBM, May 2007, Unknown number of SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Idaho National Guard, Aug 2007, 3,400 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Independent Living Funds, UK, Dec 2006, 19,000 NINs, DOBs, bank data, Physical theft
• Indiana Department of Health, Breast and Cervical Cancer Program, Nov 2006,
7,500 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• ING Bank, Dec 2005, 8,500 SSNs, financial data, Physical theft
• ING Bank, June 2006, 13,000 SSNs, financial data, Physical theft
• Internal Revenue Service, Kansas City, Jan 2007, Unknown SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Internal Revenue Service, Apr 2007, 480 DOBs, SSNs, tax data, Physical theft
• Internal Revenue Service, June 2006,
291 IRS employees’ SSNs, fingerprints, DOBs, Physical theft
• Iowa Department of Education, Feb 2007, 160,000 SSNs, DOBs, Hacking
• Iron Mountain, Inc., Apr 2006,
17,000 Long Island Railroad employees and retirees, SSNs, DOBs, personal data stolen
• Iron Mountain, Inc., suspicious consecutive warehouse fires in London and Ottawa, summer 2006, as reported in International Currency Review and the Wantagate reports. Massive loss of data, especially of Deutsche Bank records, accompanied by suspicions that the fires were started deliberately in order to destroy original fraudulent financial transaction contracts
• ISA USA, June 2006, Financial data possibly on millions of people, Leak
• Japan Post Office, Feb 2007, Financial data on 290,000, Physical theft
• Johns Hopkins Hospital, Aug 2007, 5,783 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Johns Hopkins University, Feb 2007, personal data on 52,000 people. Naturally, the intelligence source for the raw data used here has been anxious for it to be known that those affected did not include past/present employees of Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, which works closely with the NSA, CIA, and other US intelligence agencies: SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• JP Morgan Chase, Aug 2005, Unknown SSNs, financial data, Physical theft
• JP Morgan Chase, Apr 2007, 47,000 DOBs, SSNs, Physical theft
• Kaiser Permanente, Aug 2006, 160,000 DOBs, Medical record numbers, Physical theft
• Kaiser Permanente, Colorado, Nov 2006, 38,000 Medical ID Numbers, DOBs, Physical theft
• Kaiser Permanente, Feb 2007, 22,000 SSNs, DOBs, Medical data, Physical theft
• Kartenhaus, Hamburg, Germany, Oct 2007, 66,000 credit card numbers, Physical theft
• KB Homes, Jan 2007, 2,700 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• KDDI Telco, Japan, June 2006, 4,000,000 Phone numbers, DOBs, Leaked
• Keck School of Medicine, (USC), Nov 2005, 50,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Kellogg Community Federal Credit Union, Michigan, Aug 2007,
Unknown SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Kent State University, Sep 2005, 100,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Key Bank, Dec 2006, 9,300 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• King Co., Washington Transportation Department, Oct 2007, 1,400 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• LabCorp Monroe NJ Patient Service Center, Aug 2006, Unknown SSNs, Physical theft
• LaSalle Bank/ABN Amro Mortgage, Dec 2005,
2,000,000 SSNs and financial data, Lost/recovered
• Legacy Health Clinic, Oregon, Aug 2007, 747 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Lexis-Nexis, May 2005, 310,000 Phone records, Hacking
• Linden Lab/Second Life, Sep 2006, 650,000 personal information, Hacking
• Loomis Chaffee School, Aug 2007, ‘Several hundred‘ SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Los Alamos National Lab/KSL Services, Nov 2006, 1,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Los Angeles County Child Support Services, Mar 2007, 243,000 DOBs, SSNs, Physical theft
• Louisiana Office of Student Financial Assistance, Oct 2007 SSNs and DOBs of virtually all
• Louisiana college applicants over the past the past nine years SSNs, DOBs Physical theft
• Louisiana State University, Apr 2007 750 DOBs, SSNs, Physical theft
• Loyola University, Aug 2007, 5,800 SSNs, DOBs, Discarded hard drive
• Lucent/Alcatel, May 2007, 200,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Madrona Medical Group, June 2006, 6,000 SSNs, DOBs, Hacking
• Manhattan Veterans Medical Center, Oct 2006,
‘Hundreds’ of SSNs, DOBs and medical data, Physical theft
• Marks and Spencer, UK, May 2007, 20,000 DOBs, NINs, Physical theft
• Marriott, Dec 2005, 206,000 SSNs and credit data, Physical theft
• Maryland Department of the Environment, Aug 2007, Unknown SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Apr 2007, 1,400 DOBs, SSNs, Physical theft
• Massachusetts Department of Industrial Accidents, Jan 2007, 1,200 SSNs, DOBs Hacking
• Massachusetts Division of Public Licensure, Oct 2007, 450,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Massachusetts National Guard, Lowell, Jan 2007,
Unknown personal data on recruits, Physical theft
• MCI, April 2005, SSNs and employment data on 16,500 people, Physical theft
• McKesson, Sep 2007, ‘Thousands’ of SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Medco Health Solutions, Mar 2006, 4600 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Mercantile Potomac Bank, May 2006, 48,000 SSNs and account data, Physical theft
• Mercy Medical Center, Merced County, CA, Sep 2006, 295 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Merrill Lynch, Aug 2007, 30,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Metropolitan College, Denver, Feb 2006, 93,000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Metropolitan State College of Denver, Feb 2007, 988 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Miami University of Ohio, May 2006 851 SSNs, DOBsm Loss of hardware
• Michigan Department of Community Health, Sep 2006, 4000 SSNs, DOBs, Physical theft
• Minnesota Department of Revenue, June 2006, 2,400 taxpayers’ and 48,000 businesses;
SSNs + other personal data, Physical theft
• Minnesota S