BIDEN, GEITHNER, EMANUEL TAKING BUSH SR’S BRIBES

chrisstory

FORMAL C.I.A. ELIMINATION ORDER ISSUED AGAINST KEY SETTLEMENTS SIGNATORY

Tuesday 11 May 2010 19:00

ANNOUNCEMENT: 17 MAY 2010: INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW RELEASED WORLDWIDE
Outline details of this week’s release of International Currency Review are displayed in the second panel immediately below the NEWS panel on our Home Page. Also released are two further issues of Arab-Asian Affairs. Volume 33, # 5 of this title reveals how the Israeli authorities disguised the physical identity of David Kimche, the Israeli spymaster, drug controller and Director of the Israeli Foreign Office, even after his death, which took place on 8th March 2010.

• BIDEN, GEITHNER, EMANUEL TAKING BUSH BRIBES TO THWART PAYOUTS

• WAFFEN SS FRITZ KRAEMER HELD TOP U.S. N.S.C. POST

• BRIBES FOR BIDEN ET AL. ORDERED BY BUSH SR.

• OUR DEFRANCESCO EXPOSURE FORCES 24/7 BODYGUARD PROTECTION

• FORMAL C.I.A. ELIMINATION ORDER ISSUED AGAINST GOLD BADGE PAYOUTS SIGNATORY
UPDATE: Certain sensitive additional information which we cannot elaborate upon at this time indicates that the leaked promulgation by the CIA of an order to assassinate the US official in question was part of an elaborate Bushite ruse that provided dense cover for an immense heist
operation masterminded by the Bush-CIA deception experts. This operation was BLOWN with
the sudden ‘resignation’ of Gordon Brown and the consequent abrupt switch to the Cameron-Clegg partnership/Coalition arrangement. These developments coincided with certain critical matters that we can’t go into at this juncture (perhaps never), and which triggered these events.

In other words, the switch to Cameron-Clegg was connected to and driven by events behind the scenes which only very few know about, but which were and are of decisive importance.

We have left the segment dealing with the elimination order unchanged, as we are not in the habit of going back and changing what we said earlier, not least because this is the most transparent policy to adopt. But this update is inserted in order to signal to those ‘in the know’ that we are of course aware of what happened, and how it may have changed the course of history: literally.

• E.U. BAILOUT FINANCED BY $1.0 TRILLION DIVERTED FROM THE SETTLEMENTS FUNDS

• WHITE HOUSE CAMPAIGN TO SABOTAGE THE GOLD BADGE SIGNATORY’S PROGRESS

• RON PAUL: ‘YOU CAN’T BAIL OUT DEBT WITH DEBT’

• SEVERE PROBLEMS EMERGE ON THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE MARKETS

• ‘BUSHES SHOULD BE STRUNG UP IN PUBLIC LIKE SADDAM HUSSEIN’

• BUSH SR.’S U.S. AIR FORCE INTELLIGENCE HANDLER
IS ‘OCTOBER SURPRISE’ SR-71 PILOT GORDON SYMMONS

• FATAL MISCALCULATION BY WHITE HOUSE-C.I.A. DESPERADOS

• WORLD COURT ORDERED BREAKUP OF 19 U.S. CRIMINAL FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES

• FURTHER WAVES OF ARRESTS REPORTED:
CORRUPT PENTAGON’S CONSPICUOUS INACTIVITY

• CHENEY HALLIBURTON SCAMMING DETAILS SENT TO WAXMAN IN 2008

• GULF OIL RIG EXPLOSION: A ‘BLACK’ RETALIATION OPERATION AGAINST THE BRITISH

• OUR EXPOSURE OF THE HEMENWAY SHOOTING
LIFTED WITHOUT ATTRIBUTION, AND OUT OF CONTEXT

• WAS THIS ANOTHER C.I.A. ELIMINATION ORDER,
OR WAS THE SHOOTING ORDERED BY OBAMA (OR BOTH)?

• CITIBANK, ATHENS, WHERE WANTA SET UP BUSH ACCOUNTS,
BOMBED, THREE KILLED: NOT A COINCIDENCE

• ‘EUROPEAN CRISIS’ MADE IN WASHINGTON, D.C.

• EARLY BUSH II/MI-6 ATTEMPTS TO STOP OUR INVESTIGATIONS
USING GORDON THOMAS AS DUPLICITOUS INTERMEDIARY

• NOBODY WHO’S NOT IN NEED OF BRAIN SURGERY
WANTS TO BUY THE U.S. TREASURY’S ‘TRASHETS’ ANY LONGER

• U.S. TREASURY’S LIES AND SPIN EXPOSED BY
THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET’S DEBT STATISTICS

• IT’S NOT THE ECONOMY, STUPID: IT’S THE MATHEMATICS

• SOUND MECHANICS OF THE APPROVED PRIVATE SECTOR DOLLAR REFUNDING OPERATION

• UNATTRACTIVE OUTBREAK OF COORDINATED ‘BLANKFEINISM’

• S.E.C. CASE AGAINST GOLDMAN WALKS ROUND THE ELEPHANT IN THE BEDROOM

• SINCE ALL SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL, ALL DERIVATIVES
CONTRACTS ARE FRAUDULENT AND THEREFORE VOID

• PAUL VOLCKER DESTROYS HIS REPUTATION FOR INTEGRITY

• PUBLIC HAND-WRINGING BY ‘PUT-UPON’ BLANKFEIN

• BUSH II AND CLINTON CAUTION AGAINST GREED IN CHICAGO

• THE CHICAGO MAFIOSO FORK POINTED AT OBAMA

• ONGOING BLACKMAIL OPERATIONS TARGETING OBAMA TO PREVENT HIM SETTLING

• DOCUMENTS PROVE ROUTINE COLLABORATION BETWEEN C.I.A. AND ORGANISED CRIME

• EXPOSURES FORCING AMERICANS TO RECOGNISE THE PERILS OF C.I.A. CRIMINALITY

• MEANWHILE THE SINISTER ‘OFFICE OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH’ IS STILL IN THE WORKS

• POWERS TO TAKE DOWN ANY ENTITY ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD

• DESPERATE E.U. MEASURE TO ‘SAVE THE (PAN-GERMAN) EURO’
INCOMPATIBLE WITH SAVING THE FAILING SATRAP E.U. ‘MEMBER STATES’

• OPEN-ENDED E.U. LIABILITY POTENTIALLY IMPOSED
UPON BRITISH TAXPAYERS EVEN THOUGH BRITAIN IS BUST

• OUTGOING LABOUR GOVERNMENT CORRECTLY REFUSED TO GO ALONG

• OUTCOME OF THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION: TEMPORARY CHECK MATE

• GORDON BROWN RESIGNS: CAMERON GOES TO THE PALACE [11th May 2010]

• WELCOMING CAMERON, OBAMA PRAISES
THE ‘SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP’ HE TRASHED EARLIER

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

• AS PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED, OUR LANDLINES REMAIN CLOSED BECAUSE OF UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT. WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL OR THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY. Specifically we have closed down all our transatlantic voice communications using our landlines located in the New York office. This followed a 90-minute set-to that occurred on 6th May with a compartmentalised US intelligence organisation called Verizon. Years ago we ordered a 1-800 number so that North American subscribers and new order clients could call us without having to pay the transatlantic costs should we be handling calls in London. After our finding in March 2010 that the harassment calls were being directed via the 1-800 number in some cases, we took steps effective from 29th March to de-activate the landlines based in New York. We then waited to see whether we would be billed for any such calls after 29th March 2010.

The newest Verizon Bill, received late April in London, showed that we were continuing to be billed for the cost of these nuisance calls notwithstanding that the two land lines in New York had been disconnected. On 6th May we attempted to explain to uninterested Verizon personnel, including a so-called ‘Fraud Control’ Office, that since the land lines had been de-activated, it was a physical impossibility for any US calls to be relayed to London via our call forwarding facility in New York.

We therefore needed to know why were were continuing to be billed the cost of such transfers, given that the land lines had been de-activated. This proved to be way, way too complex for the operatives concerned to grasp. But what did emerge is that they could find no trace of our 1-800 number, which has been publicised on our website and in our literature and publications for many years. They then tried to deny that we own the 1-800 number in question, after we asked why we were not being billed for the facility. You would have thought they would have been interested in adding value to our monthly invoices. But no.

And why is this? Almost certainly because the 1-800 number was STOLEN FROM US at the outset by some cadre of criminalised US intelligence. The current position is that Verizon have started billing us FRAUDULENTLY for calls relayed via New York-based landlines received via the 1-800 number which they say they can find no trace of. We shall continue to press these issues until we extract the truth from this particular component of the criminalised US intelligence monstrosity.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

BIDEN, GEITHNER, EMANUEL TAKING BUSH BRIBES TO THWART PAYOUTS
It has transpired via special sources since we last reported that the following top US appointed officials are receiving weekly and monthly bribery cheques ordered by George H. W. Bush Sr. in a desperate ploy to ‘encourage’ them to maintain their sabotage against the Settlements payouts and to ‘encourage’ Bank of America to continue stealing the funds which have been allocated for the purpose, separated out and are ready to be paid:

• Vice President Joseph Biden. It is of course an IMPEACHABLE OFFENCE
for a Vice President of the United States to accept bribery payments.

• Rahm Emanuel, Obama’s White House Chief of Staff.

• Timothy Geithner, Secretary of the US Treasury. This fellow was originally picked by Dr Henry Kissinger, the notorious triple (DVD/STASI-KGB-Mossad) penetration controller, as a compliant, brainwashed US operative who could be relied upon to ensure the perpetuation of Fraudulent Finance derivatives operations based on illegal securitisation, both while serving as President of the Reserve Bank of New York (where Geithner accumulated a vast stash of derivatives estimated to have a notional value of $500 trillion, but probably much more), and when he was transferred seamlessly under Obama to the position of Treasury Secretary.

WAFFEN SS FRITZ KRAEMER HELD TOP U.S. N.S.C. POST
Now in the past we have pointed out that Dr Henry ‘Heinz’ Kissinger ‘filled in’ as the key North American agent of DVD (Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst) after Admiral Canaris (who was not hanged at Flossenburg in April 1945, as asserted by the Nazi disinformation legend), fell ill in 1974.

Kissinger then persuaded President Gerald Ford (a.k.a. Leslie Lynch King, pornographer) to sack William Colby as Director of Central Intelligence (CIA), and to replace him with the DVD’s primary representative, George H. W. Bush Sr. After Ronald Reagan had been elected President thanks to George H. W. Bush Sr.’s ‘Operation Surprise’ deception [see below], Bush Sr. considered that the Presidency should be his and therefore organised the assassination of Reagan, just as he had been involved many years earlier in implementing the assassination of President John Kennedy.

After George Bush Sr. had been elected to the Presidency in 1988, Senator John Tower sought appointment as Secretary of Defense, which would have destabilised the vast Fraudulent Finance operations and scamming that Bush Sr. intended to institutionalise within the Federal structures: so Mr Bush arranged for the CIA to issue a FORMAL ELIMINATION ORDER against Senator Tower, who duly died in a plane crash on 5th April 1991, along with his daughter and staffers.

Dr Kissinger ‘was’ ‘mentor’ to George H. W. Bush Sr., as to Timothy Geithner. And the ‘mentor’ of Kissinger was Dr Fritz Gustave Anton Kraemer, a special assistant, adviser and strategist serving the US Army Deputy Chief of Staff of Operations (DCSOPS) at the Pentagon. Kraemer, who was buried with full military honours in Arlington Cemetery some years ago, served on the US National Security Council (NSC), modelled after Hitler’s Security Council – with jurisdiction to oversee the Central Intelligence Agency under the National Security Act of 1947 (a.k.a. the ‘criminals’ charter’).

It is almost certain that this Fritz Kraemer, the top Secret Team operative in the United States, was Brigadeführer SS Fritz Kraemer, a very senior Waffen SS officer within the Hitler Nazi hierarchy, responsible for strategic Fascist atrocities during the Second World War.

Initially a war crimes defendant at Nuremberg, Brigadeführer Waffen SS Fritz Kraemer walked away from the Nuremberg trials into the service of the US military.

BRIBES FOR BIDEN ET AL. ORDERED BY BUSH SR.
The likely source of these remittances (although this has not been confirmed) is Deutsche Bank AG, by order of the corrupt Dr Joseph Ackermann, Deutsche Bank’s CEO, partner with the Three Racketeers, Mikhail Gorbachëv, George H. W. Bush Sr. and Dr Helmut Kohl, in Deutsche AG, formerly Barrington Investment Group, St Gallen, Switzerland.

The repeated ongoing bribery remittances are being paid to these corrupt office-holders on the instructions of George H. W. Bush Sr., backed by George W. Bush, who, with the Clintons and their criminal enterprise banking lackeys and Intelligence Power intermediaries, are desperate to hold on to the stolen funds and to prevent the loss of stranglehold control that they fear will ensue on payout and release of the hijacked and effectively diverted/stolen $6.2 trillion loan made available on 19th-20th June 2007 by the British Monarchical Power via the Bank of England to the criminal enterprise Bank of New York (Mellon) which diverted the funds on the instructions of Henry M. Paulson Jr., then US Secretary of the Treasury – who, along with Bush Jr., Clinton (male), and Blankfein (Goldman Sachs), is engaged (see below) ‘as we speak’ in an ongoing PR operation to convey the entirely false impression that he favours financial prudence, rectitude, discipline, integrity, honesty and all the other good things that he disregarded while holding high office.

OUR DEFRANCESCO EXPOSURE FORCES 24/7 BODYGUARD PROTECTION
Furthermore, as a direct consequence (according to a sworn and notarised Affidavit dated 31st March 2010 in this Editor’s possession) of our exposure in these reports of the Mafioso Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, whose name was inserted by the Pennsylvania Department of State Corporation Bureau as ‘Secretary’ of Mr Michael C. Cottrell’s firm Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., THE key US official (Gold Badge) Signatory responsible for and engaged in procuring the finalisation of the Settlements payments has, since that exposure, had to be equipped with bodyguards 24/7, and while present at the bank(s) responsible for the payments.

But it gets worse.

FORMAL C.I.A. ELIMINATION ORDER ISSUED AGAINST GOLD BADGE PAYOUTS SIGNATORY
On 7th May, this key US official was directly threatened on orders issued by the de facto Mafiosi George H. W. Bush Sr. and George Bush Jr.. At 10.45 pm UK time on 8th May, the Editor of this service was, in addition, FORMALLY advised that:

• The threat against the US Gold Badge referenced above (whose identity is known to this service) is an OFFICIAL C.I.A. ELIMINATION ORDER.

• Astonishingly, this intelligence has been leaked to us by a senior C.I.A. operative, also known (personally, in this instance) to this service.

What this means is that the Bush Crime Syndicate, which controls the Central Intelligence Agency, has reached a level of desperation so intense that it has resorted to an OFFICIAL, FORMAL C.I.A. ELIMINATION ORDER against the paymaster Gold Badge Signatory who’s in charge of procuring the necessary outcome, having evidently run out of other malicious options.

E.U. BAILOUT FINANCED BY $1.0 TRILLION DIVERTED FROM THE SETTLEMENTS FUNDS
Over Saturday and Sunday 8th-9th May 2010, the Gold Badge Signatory against whom the CIA has issued a formal elimination order (confirmed to us as stated above) entered into an arrangement with agents reporting ultimately to George H. W. Bush Sr. on the basis of some ‘deal’ or other, as a consequence of which $1.0 trillion was released from earmarked Settlement funds. This money was immediately sucked into the bowels of the Federal Reserve and has disappeared, although since the funds are resident within the central banking /Treasury systems, they can be traced.

The $1.0 trillion was diverted to help fund the purchase of US Government bonds to be deployed in the context of the European bailout operation cobbled together over the weekend.

Irrespective of what alternative explanations for this latest scam may emerge, The New York Times reported on 10th May as follows:

‘European Finance Ministers arrived in Brussels on Sunday with broad agreement on the need for a fiscal contribution from the European Union budget and some kind of fund to stabilize the most troubled markets. By several accounts in Europe, a 500 billion-Euro figure first emerged Sunday afternoon, when Mr Sarkozy called Mrs Merkel after each had spoken with Mr Obama’.

The New York Times then elaborated with convoluted explanations of what was finally agreed. But we need, in fact, go no further than where we stopped quoting the newspaper, above.

• Why on earth would it be necessary for Sarkozy and Merkel to speak to President Obama on a matter involving the raising of funds from European sources?

Answer: Because, contrary to the elaborate spin, the funds weren’t ever going to be raised from European sources (although duplicated ‘shadow’ arrangements implying such an accord, for cover purposes, may have been ‘agreed’) – given that Germany and France are routinely in the habit of deceiving their ‘fellow’ Europeans, especially the stupid British.

No. The funds were diverted from the Settlement resources, following a set-up mounted over the weekend, with the full knowledge and support of the Obama White House, working to instructions ultimately derived from the Bush apparat, against the Gold Badge Signatory named by the CIA as a formal target for elimination, as cited above.

Knowledge of this CIA elimination order, thought to have been gleaned by UK eavesdroppers from a conversation between the Editor of this service and an impeccably informed US source over the weekend, triggered highest-level British protests to the White House on Sunday, we understand. The British authority wished to know why a CIA death warrant had been issued against the Gold Badge Signatory who is equipped with full authority to procure the finalisation and distribution of the Settlements and Dollar Refunding monies.

(Answer: Because the Bush-DVD-CIA apparat has ordered the Obama White House to block the Settlements, of course. In this context we are told that Obama cannot stand the strain of the ‘Black’ forces preying on him and, given that he is blackmailable (see below), hasn’t got the strength or the guts to tell all concerned to cease and desist from these continuing sabotage operations).

WHITE HOUSE CAMPAIGN TO SABOTAGE THE GOLD BADGE SIGNATORY’S PROGRESS
On top of all this, we have been specifically informed that the same Gold Badge Signatory with the necessary Settlements authorities has been systematically sabotaged, diverted, undermined and otherwise gravely abused over the past few days, on orders from the Obama White House – which in turn now OPENLY acknowledges that it takes its orders from the Chicago Mafia and the George Bush-DVD component of the criminalised Intelligence Power, which serves the interests not of the United States and the American people, but of Germany and its twin, France.

Hence, in the above scenario, it was natural and routine for Merkel and Sarkozy to check with President Barack Obama just to make sure that the funds would be/had been diverted from the Settlements resources, so that the latest financial wheeze designed to delay the collapse of the German hegemony project, could be nailed into place, at least for public consumption purposes.

RON PAUL: ‘YOU CAN’T BAIL OUT DEBT WITH DEBT’
One Congressman who does understand the advanced form of madness driving the White House, the Treasury and the Federal Reserve, as they continue wilfully down the wrong path, is of course Representative Ron Paul, who points out that ‘you can’t bail out debt with debt’. No, as we have repeatedly explained, you can’t: but that is precisely what these desperate financial terrorists are doing, in order to keep their hot air balloon in the air and the carousel continuing by exploiting the collective stupidity of foreign central banks.

These include the Bank of Japan, the Bank of England, the Bundesbank, the Banque de France, the Swiss National Bank and the European Central Bank – which, for some unexplained reason, have not yet realised that the Federal Reserve is corrupt and compromised, and that the US authorities are following a course guaranteed to lead to financial and economic catastrophe.

A system effectively of 90-day repos has been arranged whereby these dumb central banks will be printing their own currencies, and stuffing them to the Federal Reserve on behalf of the Treasury, in exchange for Treasuries. But Treasuries are completely worthless: as indicated below, nobody in the marketplace who’s not in need of brain surgery wants US Treasuries these days.

So the crazed US authorities are using up the only undeserved residual source of goodwill they have left – the rather ‘thick’ central banking community. Foreign central bankers need to wake up and come to their senses. By accommodating the US authorities via these exotic operations, the foreign central banks, including the Bank of England which has been repeatedly ripped off by these sheisters, are merely buying more time for the desperate clique in charge of America’s progressive financial and economic destruction, to complete the collapsing of the system.

The right thing to do when confronted with bandits in your front room is to order them out of the room, or to shoot them dead. You hardly invite them to sit down and have a nice cup of tea and cake. The central banks that are accommodating the American official financial criminalists are choosing the easy option: which means that all they are doing is stacking up worse trouble for the future, and guaranteeing that when the US financial balloon explodes, all the subsidiary financial balloons held aloft by these myopic central bankers will explode in tandem.

SEVERE PROBLEMS EMERGE ON THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE MARKETS
There’s also severe trouble on the foreign exchange markets. New York dealers are complaining that only spot forex trades are being handled, because foreign exchange dealers can no longer trust counterparty banks to honour spreads agreed-upon at the time of the transaction.

And with the Federal Reserve arrogating to itself effectively the rôle of the world’s primary foreign exchange centre, as well as the rôle of rediscounter for the central banks, the emerging state of affairs is that the most unsound, decadent, corrupt and failing central banking system in the world believes that it can remain in business sine die by means of these artificial arrangements involving the creation of new debt for old.

Since the named central banks evidently believe that this is possible, they deserve what is coming to them. As for the Bank of England, which knows all about the private sector US Dollar Refunding operation to be conducted out of London (as has been reconfirmed to us on 11th May, by the way), it appears to be no better than Merkel and Sarkozy.

Like elements of MI-6, it is evidently sabotaging the British Monarchical Power. There has always been a serious problem inside the Bank of England: and you’ve only got to observe the lugubrious physiognomy of Mr (still not even knighted) Mervyn King, the Bank Governor, to recognise that this must indeed be the case. Otherwise he’d smile occasionally. But he never does.

‘BUSHES SHOULD BE STRUNG UP IN PUBLIC LIKE SADDAM HUSSEIN’
Reverting to the CIA’s order to assassinate the Gold Badge Signatory authority, it was explained to us on the transatlantic phone between 10.45 p.m. and 11.00 p.m. on Saturday 8th May 2010 that this desperate criminal CIA order reflects the demands of George H. W. Bush Sr. and George W. Bush Jr., whose selfish interests are directly opposed to those of the United States, the American people and the Rest of the World, and that:

• George H. W. Bush Sr. should be arrested as a terrorist and should be made to suffer the same fate before TV cameras as Saddam Hussein, to prevent the further irreparable damage that he is knowingly inflicting on the whole world, and that:

• George W. Bush Jr. should likewise be arrested as a terrorist and should be made to suffer the same fate before TV cameras as Saddam Hussein, to prevent the further irreparable damage that he is knowingly inflicting on the whole world.

This fate should, our transatlantic correspondent explained, be fulfilled in front of the TV cameras so that everyone holding or seeking official positions in the United States is compelled belatedly to understand that public service involves exclusively service to the people of the United States, and not opportunities for personal enrichment.

George Bush Sr.’s possibly prophetic observation, indicative of his innermost fears, that ‘if the American people knew what we’d done, they’d string us up from lamp posts’, may yet be realised.

BUSH SR.’S U.S. AIR FORCE INTELLIGENCE HANDLER
IS ‘OCTOBER SURPRISE’ SR-71 PILOT GORDON SYMMONS
These Fascist criminals are intellectually impaired, just like Mussolini. The reoffending criminal mentality is, by definition, stunted. We are informed that George Bush Sr. is being handled these days by the very same SR-71 stealth plane pilot (US Air Force Intelligence) who flew him to Paris for the ‘October Surprise’ coup designed to deprive Jimmy Carter of re-election, in favour of Ronald Reagan, whom George Bush Sr. soon took steps to try to have assassinated (an operation that was botched), so that he himself could take over as President.

It is this US Naval Intelligence operative, Gordon Symmons, resident in Chesapeake, VA, who is telling Bush Sr. and Jr. what to do, and how to respond to the unprecedented pressures being applied against the Bush Crime apparat and its CIA-DVD satrap community – advising them on how to resist all pressures, come what may, even if this means destroying the entire global financial economy, so that they can keep what they have stolen.

This traitor Symmons is, we understand, the ONLY technician-adviser left serving the nefarious, discredited and loathed serial criminal, George H. W. Bush Sr. Recall that, as we have reported, the heinous ‘Black’ fabrication and disinformation operative Thomas Heneghan’s handler is the US Air Force Intelligence convicted securities fraudster Otis C. Johnston (1). The reason for the central rôle of US Air Force Intelligence is that it is this rogue component of the hideously dangerous, out-of-control US Intelligence Power that controls the United States’ nuclear weapons.

FATAL MISCALCULATION BY WHITE HOUSE-C.I.A. DESPERADOS
This formal CIA elimination order and threat against the Signatory Gold Badge turns out to be a fatal miscalculation – not least because given this posting, the information is now in the public domain. The standard response procedure with the intelligence we publish is as follows:

• The controlled, flaky diversionary fabrication and disinformation websites typically pick up a peripheral point while ignoring the critical information contained in the report; and:

• Because of several successful early operations by MI-6 against the Editor of this service, using that two-faced veteran UK journalist Gordon Thomas as intermediary, the British media, being gullible and ‘unaware’ of dirty tricks, were persuaded to pay no attention to what we publish. The purpose of those operations, involving direct lies about the Editor (which took place back in 2004 and 2005), and a set-up, was to ensure that the British media would disregard the biggest financial corruption exposure reportage operation in world history – as a result of which the ‘mainstream’ has been floundering and barking up the wrong trees ever since.

Nevertheless, we have, as a direct consequence of the miscalculations of Mr Wanta who, in pursuit of his own and Bush Sr.’s objectives, magnified our platform via the French intelligence electronic distribution network in 2006-2007, managed to perform an ‘end-run’ around the sleepy ‘mainstream’ media – despite the 37 threats (of which seven were death threats) received by the Editor of this service in the course of this investigation (over the period 2002-2010).

Now we have hard intelligence that the US Gold Badge official Signatory, who serves the United States, but also has to work with elements of British intelligence as well, is at the receiving end of an OFFICIAL C.I.A. ELIMINATION ORDER, the purpose being to sabotage the Settlements payouts process by killing the holder of the crucial necessary signatory powers.

WORLD COURT ORDERED BREAKUP OF 19 U.S. CRIMINAL FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES
All this is taking place against the background of the fact that about two weeks ago (we now learn), a World Court order was obtained demanding the break-up (i.e., dissolution) of 19 American banks, under the Lien powers held by the Lien holders – which order the banks are defying, just as Bank of America is defying its legal responsibility to disgorge the funds which are ready for disbursal and must be paid out. Transatlantic tensions over this are at the explosion stage.

FURTHER WAVES OF ARRESTS REPORTED:
CORRUPT PENTAGON’S CONSPICUOUS INACTIVITY
Moreover this has remained the case DESPITE further waves of arrests, on top of the previously reported 30 or so arrests which took place in late April, which have been reported to us and were reconfirmed on 7th May 2010. In other words, when you yank a dozen snakes out of the snakepit, a dozen more take their place.

This raises the issue: what is the Pentagon doing about this – admittedly, a pointless question, in view of the control exercised over the Bushsnakes by US Air Force Intelligence operative Gordon Symmons? The US military can, at the drop of a helmet, surround the banks, procure compliance at the barrels of guns with the absolute requirements of the Pay Orders and presumably also of the Basel List including the Line Item covering the Refunding Loan payment – the only problem being that it is presided over by a former CIA Director of Central Intelligence.

But even Mr Gates, having seen his department scammed and ransacked by Halliburton [see the preceding report, on which NONE of the diversionary US websites sponsored by the controlling Intelligence Power have commented, of course], must by now realise that there is no future for the United States if the criminalist behaviour of the Intelligence Power that he fronted in the past is allowed to persist. So is this man the complicit, compromised and controlled wimp he seems?

CHENEY HALLIBURTON SCAMMING DETAILS SENT TO WAXMAN IN 2008
Concerning our Halliburton re-exposure (2), it is to be noted that, as stated in our original report dated 26th May 2008, the information in question was leaked after it had earlier been made available to Congressman Waxman. Which sheds an interesting light, does it not, on the demands made upon Halliburton by Mr Waxman’s Committee, set out in his letter dated 30th April 2010 concerning the cementing operations conducted on the British Petroleum Oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico prior to the blow-out (which we reproduce again as Note (3) below). Given this connection, we prefer to rely on Mr Waxman’s detailed knowledge of the dual scamming operation by Halliburton within the CIA and the Pentagon as the source of his Committee’s obvious immediate suspicions concerning the rôle of Halliburton in the perpetration of this latest abomination.

Of course, Mr Waxman has a severe problem here, as well. Given the devastating corruption exposed in our reiterated Halliburton scamming report, what did he do with this information in 2008? Logic would suggest that it was his Committee which will have made the grotesque, officially condoned scamming information available to a Grand Jury which, we understand, has considered this scandal. But has the information gone nowhere and been sealed, in order to protect Cheney, the Box Gang and the corrupt Intelligence Power of which Halliburton is itself an outgrowth?

GULF OIL RIG EXPLOSION: A ‘BLACK’ RETALIATION OPERATION AGAINST THE BRITISH
Only ten days prior to the blowout, Halliburton conveniently snapped up a giant marine firefighting corporation for $250.00 million. Persistent suggestions that Goldman Sachs shorted Transocean immediately ahead of the blow-out refuse to be erased from the record, although we removed our initial reference to this pending further research. Most tellingly of all, as always occurs after these atrocities, the stories keep a-changing. There was no Deadman switch. Now, all of a sudden, it is reported that there WAS a Deadman blowout preventer. And to rub in BP’s humiliation, corporation executives are now reported to have been on board at a party to celebrate BP’s safety record, and the first explosion occurred in the room next to where the party was being held. This would have been known days ago, one would have thought.

Given former US criminal Vice President Richard B. Cheney’s integration with Halliburton, what are the odds that this was indeed a malicious sabotage operation against this prime British asset by the infuriated and utterly desperate Bush-CIA Crime apparat, in the face of the intense pressure that is continuing to be exerted on the Octopus by the British Monarchical Power? Clearly, they must be rated as exceptionally high. In this connection, given the extent of our partial knowledge of what is taking place behind the scenes in the context alluded to herein, all other ‘explanations’ for the blowout can be seen to serve the usual obfuscation and diversion objectives.

After all, the standard ‘Black’ counterintelligence procedure after each abomination has been perpetrated, is to seek to befuddle and bamboozle the necessarily confused general public with contradictory, conflicting, unprovenanced, anonymous, spoof, partial, inconsequential, fabricated and often deliberately provocative website lies and sequences, in order to ensure that gullible people run after the sterile red herrings served up for that purpose, so that the crucial facts that have been revealed are bypassed and ignored. As we have frequently pointed out, this is a far more sophisticated modus operandi than that applied by Dr Joseph Goebbels, whose method(replicated by the Soviets) was to repeat a single lie so relentlessly that it morphed into ‘the truth’.

With the abuse by malevolent counterintelligence of modern electronic communications, you get untutored people who can’t distinguish between opinion and fact to do your dirty work for you: hence the invention of that diabolical cesspit called ‘the Blog’.

OUR EXPOSURE OF THE HEMENWAY SHOOTING
LIFTED WITHOUT ATTRIBUTION, AND OUT OF CONTEXT
A recent case in point was the irresponsible posting, WITHOUT ATTRIBUTION and completely out of context, by www.freerupublic.com, of our originating briefing report on the assassination of the youngest son of lawyer John Hemenway, who brought a Quo Warranto action against President Obama. John Hemenway Jr., 47, was shot dead in Bedford, VA; and as you must surely be aware, by definition, any atrocity that takes place in Virginia, home of the criminalised US Intelligence Power, is always especially suspect.

Our text having been lifted without attribution, the abomination was then elaborated by people (via that wayward website’s attached ‘Blog’) with absolutely no knowledge of the situation, divesting themselves of knee-jerk reactions to a state of affairs of the utmost gravity, as evidenced by the following circumstances:

• President Obama ‘joked’ about his missing birth certificate at an event for the ‘mainstream’ press on the self-same day as the shooting.

• After we had been informed that an autopsy was taking place, the body of John Hemenway Jr. was cremated the day after he was shot.

• A strange blanket of silence descended on the matter after our initial report, and as far as we can gather, no report about the shooting appeared in any so-called ‘mainstream’ outlet.

• Our impeccable US source informed the Editor on 3rd May: ‘I personally know that John (Jr.) would never commit suicide for any reason, and it’s strange that nobody knows what happened…. I don’t think his family will ever be able to find out what happened to him, and the authorities haven’t disclosed anything which could be helpful to the family’.

Meanwhile John Hemenway Sr., aged 84, bears the burden not only of the Quo Warranto lawsuit against Obama but also of the sudden loss, by an ‘unexplained shooting’ in Bedford, VA, of his youngest son of the same name.

The Memorial took place on 4th May, as we have reported, and we repeat the text of the Memorial as Note (4) below, just in case anybody dares to doubt what we have stated.

WAS THIS ANOTHER C.I.A. ELIMINATION ORDER,
OR WAS THE SHOOTING ORDERED BY OBAMA (OR BOTH)?
Knowing the depths of depravity to which the serpents that we are having to expose routinely descend, it is far from unlikely that the Presidential ‘joke’ referenced above, which the gullible and increasingly discredited US ‘mainstream’ media representatives thought was funny, represented a ‘Black’ act of ‘in-your-face’ defiance by Mr Obama over the legitimacy issue; and if that obvious deduction is correct, then of course the President of the United States, with his known Mafioso links (see below), knew all about the hit, didn’t he?

Which leaves the unresolved issue of why the body was cremated almost immediately after we were told that an autopsy was taking place. This kind of thing only happens when a dirty deed has to be covered up. The suggestion from one of our sources is that John Hemenway Jr.’s wife ordered the immediate cremation: but given the known sunny character of the late Mr Hemenway Jr., a patent attorney described by our main informant as ‘a very kind soul’, none of this ‘stacks’.

As a consequence of which, we entertain the very gravest suspicion about this murder – namely that it was ordered or sanctioned by the President of the United States: or that it was another FORMAL C.I.A. ELIMINATION ORDER. Which amounts to the same thing.

CITIBANK, ATHENS, WHERE WANTA SET UP BUSH ACCOUNTS,
BOMBED, THREE KILLED: NOT A COINCIDENCE
Meanwhile, amid the revolutionary disintegration in Athens recently, it has not passed unnoticed that it was Citibank, in Athens, that was bombed, and where three bankers were killed. It will be recalled that we have repeatedly noted the rôle of Citibank, Athens, as the counterparty holder of a vast stash of worthless derivatives exchanged by complicit Greek personnel for Euros, in trading collaboration with agents of the Bush Financial Crime apparat. And where, inter alia, did the felon, serial fraudster and Bush Sr. courier-lackey, Leo/Lee Wanta, open accounts on behalf of his boss, George Bush Sr.? Why, with Citibank, Athens.

And it was the serial fraudster and felon Leo/Lee Wanta – who deceived the Editor of this service and exploited our publicity platform for 18 months, while scamming him of his $35,000 loan – and who, having established the Ionian Bank in Cyprus on behalf of Bush Sr., worked with the Italian-based CIA counterpart operative, Marco Saba, effectively preparing the bankrupting of Greece.

‘EUROPEAN CRISIS’ MADE IN WASHINGTON, D.C.
So, as you can see, the ‘European crisis’ is directly connected to, and a specific consequence of, the Fraudulent Finance operations mounted by the Bush/CIA/DVD criminal apparat that we alone have been burdened with exposing, and which the so-called ‘mainstream’ media have sidestepped and ignored – thanks, in the case of the British press, to its stupidity in paying any attention to the malicious early operations of MI-6 perpetrated against the Editor of this service, whose job is to go behind the financial news to bring our subscribers intelligence not reflected in the ‘mainstream’.

• In the case of The Daily Telegraph, for which the Editor used to contribute extensive op-ed articles in the 1970s and 1980s, the false witness lies about the Editor were almost certainly fed in by the veteran journalist Gordon Thomas, who writes articles for the newspaper to this day.

EARLY BUSH II/MI-6 ATTEMPTS TO STOP OUR INVESTIGATIONS
USING GORDON THOMAS AS DUPLICITOUS INTERMEDIARY
In late 2004, Gordon Thomas informed the Editor that after George W. Bush was ‘re-elected’ that November, US official sources asked MI-6: ‘What are you going to do about Mr Story?’

MI-6 then responded by mounting an entrapment operation exploiting the fact that the Editor had unfortunately not realised that American Free Press, which had commissioned an article by him, was in fact the phoenix version of the notorious Spotlight publication, run by an anti-Semitic CIA cadre out of an office in lower Pennsylvania Avenue. The simple set-up technique, in which the CIA cadre running the operation directly participated, was to arrange for a Telegraph journalist to call up the Pennsylvania Avenue office during the period when the Editor was in that office (in order to collect a cheque which of course the CIA cadre had failed to pay).

• That conveyed to the Daily Telegraph journalist the false impression that the Editor is anti-Semitic, the object of the discrediting ploy.

MI-6 also disseminated lies to the British media about the Editor’s alleged involvement with Mark Thatcher in connection with the Equatorial Guinea fiasco, and with the dirty drug-dealer and Blair supporter Bernie Ecclestone, in connection with some scamming operation out of Monaco. Gordon Thomas was directly involved as ‘Black’ intermediary in the promulgation to the Editor of these lies, which he said had been disseminated ‘in order to make you sit up’.

• The Editor responded by redoubling his efforts to find out in much greater detail what MI-6 and the Bush II régime were attempting to cover up: hence this investigation and these reports.

The Editor’s personal experience, confirmed by others, is that everyone who ventures to expose these serpents is liable to find himself at the receiving end of malicious lies, false witness, and usually attempts at a set-up. We were set up and exploited by Mr Wanta, and when we severed relations with that snake, the Editor thought that a million emails would arrive from clever-clogs lambasting him with ‘told you so’ messages.

In actual fact, we didn’t receive ONE SINGLE COMMUNICATION to that effect. When the Editor repeatedly asked knowledgeable US sources why this was so, the tired response was this:

‘Wanta is the world’s most accomplished deceiver and liar. He’s deceived everybody. So your experience isn’t even interesting’.

• When MI-6 considered that they had deceived the ‘mainstream’ media by bearing false witness against the Editor of this service, they were able to inform their criminal colleagues in the Bush II Administration that they had successfully ‘handled’ the situation, which turned out to be inaccurate.

NOBODY WHO’S NOT IN NEED OF BRAIN SURGERY
WANTS TO BUY THE U.S. TREASURY’S ‘TRASHETS’ ANY LONGER
On 5th May, the Financial Times reported from New York that the US Treasury had announced the first reduction in US Government debt sales since 2007, reflecting ‘improving economic growth’ which was ‘buoying tax receipts’. The official spin, absorbed lock stock and barrel by the British financial newspaper, was that given an economic turnround, the US Treasury didn’t need to sell as much debt as it needed to previously. Quarterly debt sales due in the week beginning on 10th May would be reduced by $3.0 billion, to $78 billion, compared with the February refunding.

U.S. TREASURY’S LIES AND SPIN EXPOSED BY
THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET’S DEBT STATISTICS
However if we look at the US Office of Management and Budget’s statistics (notwithstanding their notorious unreliability), we find that the Statutory Debt Limit was raised to $6.4 trillion on 28th June 2002, and to $10.6 trillion on 30th July 2008. On 17th February 2009, in parallel with Mr Obama’s first Budget, the Statutory Debt Limit was increased from $11.3 trillion (effective from 3rd October 2008) to $12.4 trillion for the rest of Fiscal Year 2009.

• The estimated figure to which the Statutory Debt Limit will need to be raised in Fiscal Year 2010 is $13.8 trillion, rising to an estimated $19.7 trillion by Fiscal Year 2015.

If we review another OMB series, we find that what the official budgetologists refer to as ‘Gross Federal Debt’, at $9,986,082 billion, is offset by ‘Debt Held by Government Accounts of $4,183,032 billion, falsely implying that the actual indebtedness of the Federal Government at the end of the 2008 Fiscal Year was $5,803,050. However as we have repeatedly explained both here and in our International Currency Review, ‘Debt Held by Government Accounts’ represents the mandatory entitlement obligations of the Federal Government.

This ‘smoke and mirrors’ arrangement hides the enormity of the Government’s true indebtedness (on the basis of the OMB’s official data, which are the only data available, even though they are largely nonsense), under a statutory requirement whereby the surpluses accrued in the so-called Budget ‘Trust Funds’ are ‘invested’ in the ‘Federal Funds’ accounts (current expenditure) – which means that these earmarked surpluses have all been squandered. But the future obligations which the surpluses existed to fund, remain unchanged.

Therefore, instead of being subtracted from the ‘Gross Federal Debt’ data, these amounts (which are referenced by OMB as ‘Debt Held by Government Accounts’) have to be ADDED BACK TO the Gross Federal Debt data. With this necessary adjustment, the ‘Adjusted Federal Debt’ using these numbers amounted to $14,169,114 billion at the end of Fiscal Year 2008. On the same calculations, the ‘Adjusted Federal Debt’ aggregates $18,275,577 billion by the end of Fiscal Year 2010 (30th September 2010), reaching $19,789,733 billion by 30th September 2011 and $25,378,196 billion by 30th September 2015. And, as indicated, these calculations use the OMB’s unreliable statistics.

Just how unreliable they are is now openly acknowledged by the Office of Management and Budget itself, which has XXXXXXXXXed out the later numbers because the OMB seeks to avoid excessive condemnation for misleading the public (which it has in fact been doing at least since President Carter’s time, but never mind). If you press an XXXXXXXXXed line, a number will appear at the top indicating what is hidden. Presumably the idea here is to convey to the fleeting observer that the OMB is hedging its bets, but the ‘experts’ can discover what is being covered up by pressing the hidden number (on the OMB’s website).

There is no difference between these presentations and the fake numbers we used to have to grapple with under overt Communism, when analysts were confronted with the impossible task of making sense of the falsified statistics promulgated by Comecon. For good measure, the OMB’s published budget deficit data, which entail known falsifications, are worth adding here. According to these data, the United States’ published Federal budget deficit for Fiscal Year 2008 was $458,555 billion. The figure for Fiscal Year 2009 rose to $1,412,686 billion, and the OMB’s official projection for Fiscal Year 2010 is $1,555,582 billion.

There is no way that these data can possibly be reconciled with the US Treasury’s 5th May 2010 announcement, heavily spun by ‘Hill and Knowlton’, that it is now possible to reduce quarterly debt sales at all – sales, that is, of debt to GENUINE PURCHASERS. But in order to disguise the reality – that it cannot sell Treasuries into the gullible financial markets as of old, so it has been ‘selling’ Treasuries to the Federal Reserve (and probably to its own accounts) instead – the US Treasury is representing that ‘things are improving’, which will alleviate the pressure to sell more debt.

IT’S NOT THE ECONOMY, STUPID: IT’S THE MATHEMATICS
Unfortunately for the Treasury’s spin-meisters, not everyone is quite as gullible as the financial market gurus so eagerly sought out by ‘mainstream’ financial journalists, as they seek to pad out their dreary reports on such subjects. For it is neither here nor there HOW MUCH THE ECONOMY IMPROVES, even if it IS improving: and who knows, given official, Comecon-style manipulation of the macroeconomic data as well?

It is not variations in economic activity and the consequent increase or decrease in the tax take which are the pertinent factors here. It is the RELENTLESS LOGIC OF THE UNDERLYING DEBT MATHEMATICS, some detail of which we have demonstrated above (albeit having had to use the OMB’s intrinsically unreliable numbers).

What this means is that even if the US economy were to grow at Chinese rates, the TREND of the underlying US debt mathematics would not change for many, many years. Such growth rates would indeed fill gaps and would alleviate the need for the Treasury to issue debt on the permissive scale to which it had become accustomed. But the logic of the mathematics would not be changed: the pace of the deterioration would be reduced, and no time horizon that makes sense could be relied upon to pinpoint the ‘magic’ moment when debt accumulation stalls, and moves into reverse.

Of course there is no prospect of the US economy (now that it’s so irrevocably Third World in so many respects) ever growing at such rates: so further consideration of this model would be futile.

Which reveals what REALLY underlies this PR statement carried in the Financial Times on 5th May: The US Treasury cannot issue Treasuries to marketplace buyers on any meaningful scale, which means that its Treasuries issuance fest has collapsed, as we predicted would happen: all it can do is to issue paper to the Federal Reserve.

And lo! When we review the Office of Management and Budget’s data on this score, we find that the column headed ‘Debt Held by the Public’ is XXXXXXXXXed right the way back to 1983. This was emphatically NOT the case when we last examined these data several months ago.

Within the category ‘the Public’, resides the Federal Reserve itself, as the Fed is a private sector institution. Now the OMB numbers reflecting official debt held by the Federal Reserve ‘remain intact’ (i.e., have not been XXXXXXXXXed). Which means, does it not, that the adjacent column obfuscates the situation: otherwise the OMB would surely not have considered it necessary to XXXXXXXXX these data right back to 1983.

SOUND MECHANICS OF THE APPROVED PRIVATE SECTOR DOLLAR REFUNDING OPERATION
As you know, all this gross deception could have been avoided had the loan made available by the British Monarchical Power on 19th-20th June 2007 via the Bank of England not been hijacked and diverted by Bank of New York (Mellon) on the instructions of then US Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr., the former CEO of Goldman Sachs, which is the subject of the SEC’s devastating Civil Complaint [see text in our report dated 18th April 2010].

Those loan funds were intended for the Dollar Refunding operation agreed to by the Group of Seven Financial Powers in both 2006 and 2007, and urged by Her Majesty the Queen ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’. Since it would appear that, even at this late stage, observers have simply not understood what all this is about, we re-explain it in this segment.

The US Treasury’s decadent intention, held together by the Bush bribes accepted by Geithner, Biden and Emanuel (see above), has been not only to retain the $6.2 trillion loan (i.e. to STEAL the loan funds in perpetuity), but to retain control over the Refunding by performing it below the radar internally – and pulling the wool, as always, over the eyes of the gullible financial markets (Market participants and analysts think they are exceedingly clever at all times, but usually nit-pick around ephemeral data and information, failing to see the density of the wood behind the trees). So here’s an elementary lesson in economic accounting, applicable to the Refunding:

(1): If the Government does the refunding (e.g., by issuing exotic instruments and engaging in ‘creative’ trading with counterparties with incredible rates of return), the accounting position is that the other side of the balance sheet accumulates MORE DEBT to offset the instruments issued.

• Furthermore, as in this context the Government cannot tax itself, NO MEANINGFUL REAL TAX REVENUES ACCRUE ON-BALANCE SHEET to the Treasury, which is the object of the exercise.

(2): By contrast, as the $6.2 trillion sovereign fund is a LOAN, to be used exclusively in the PRIVATE SECTOR (NOT within the Government sector, below the radar where it is open to ongoing abuse) the following entirely opposite accounting situation applies:

• The transparent, taxable securities transactions conducted in the private sector Dollar Refunding operation generate ON-BALANCE SHEET TAX REVENUES payable directly to the Treasury ON-BALANCE SHEET, thereby immediately amortising accumulated ‘background’ debt.

• The other side of the balance sheet to these transactions is the LOAN FUND.

Is it really necessary to acquire First Class degrees in accounting and economics in order to UNDERSTAND that THIS is THE SOLUTION, and THE ONLY SOLUTION?

And is it not a fact that the persistent opposition to this G-7-approved solution by the Bush II and Obama White House, and by the Paulson and Geithner Treasury, represents not merely grotesque dereliction of the incumbents’ duties to serve the interests of the American people and the United States to the absolute exclusion of all other considerations, but also entitles these highest-level operatives to be arrested for TREASON AGAINST THE UNITED STATES?

UNATTRACTIVE OUTBREAK OF COORDINATED ‘BLANKFEINISM’
Meanwhile some of the most egregious perpetrators and financial criminals have been practicising in the mirror of late to perfect their expertise in the art of Leninist ‘contradictions’ – a.k.a. speaking out of the left-hand side of their mouths as though no-one had noticed that their actions have all along diverged from their verbal assertions.

First, the former US Treasury Secretary, Henry M. Paulson Jr., the man who ordered the $6.2 trillion sovereign loan fund to be hijacked, diverted and effectively stolen in 2007 [see above], appeared before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission on 6th May to ‘caution’ that all investment banking transactions must be done ‘with the highest standards of fair dealing’.

Observe how this criminal financier and operative made his point: he told the Commission that such transactions ‘must’ conform to high standards, which is not the same thing as acknowledging that Goldman Sachs and the other Fraudulent Finance specialist houses have been engaged in implementing ‘the highest standards of fair dealing’ or are currently so engaged.

In other words, Paulson said nothing at all. He just made a statement to which no objection could be taken and which bore no relationship at all to the routine Fraudulent Finance operations over which he presided as Treasury Secretary and as CEO at Goldman Sachs.

Moreover, like all these criminal financiers, Paulson skated over the fact that under US law, and in all Common Law countries, securitisation is absolutely illegal [see our report dated 18th April 2010]. For Paulson, there was never any problem with securitisation – which, being translated, means that Paulson remains content, to this day, that the Rule of Law should continue to be trampled on, which as we have so extensively exposed, is in any case his normal modus operandi.

S.E.C. CASE AGAINST GOLDMAN WALKS ROUND THE ELEPHANT IN THE BEDROOM
Of course, as we have pointed out, the very Civil Case brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC] itself against Goldman Sachs [see report, 18th April 2010] addresses alleged fraudulent behaviour by Goldman Sachs but EVADES the broader reality that securitisation is illegal. In other words, the SEC’s case against Goldman Sachs addresses fraudulent operations conducted by the institution within the overall context of illegality. The SEC could perfectly well, in theory, round on all these corrupt speculating Fraudulent Finance institutions on the ground that they have been engaged in marketing fraudulent securities, beginning with the central reality that if the original mortgagor (in the case of mortgage-backed securities (MBS)) had not knowingly given his or her specific written consent to the assignment of the asset, then all derivative transactions have been and are NULL AND VOID.

SINCE ALL SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL, ALL DERIVATIVES
CONTRACTS ARE FRAUDULENT AND THEREFORE VOID
As previously noted, this is the gigantic elephant in the bedroom. Because what this means is that 100% of derivatives transactions, past and ongoing, are fraudulent; and where a contract is entered into to facilitate fraud, it is automatically voided. So, like former US Treasury Secretary Paulson, the SEC is itself co-conspiring in the perpetuation of the fabrication that securitisation is legal, which is not the case. We explained all this in excruciating detail in International Currency Review, Volume 34, Number 2, the theme of which was ‘The Legalisation of Financial Corruption’.

In fact, the ‘legalisation’ implied is illusory: what has happened is that ‘because everyone was doing it’, the immense breach of the law that this criminal behaviour entailed was simply ‘legalised’ by the authorities turning a blind eye to what was going on – something that came easily, as so many high-level officials were enriching themselves in the process.

PAUL VOLCKER DESTROYS HIS REPUTATION FOR INTEGRITY
On the same date (6th May 2010), the former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, Paul Volcker, now Chairman of President Obama’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board, unilaterally destroyed his reputation for integrity by writing a letter to Senators stating that ‘The provision of derivatives by commercial banks to their customers in the usual course of a banking relationship should not be prohibited’. In other words, Volcker agrees with Paulson that the Rule of Law should continue to be disregarded by the banks, thereby destroying his repuation for integrity.

Mr Volcker’s letter, sent from his Fifth Avenue, New York City, apartment, read as follows:

May 6, 2010

Dear Mr Chairman [Senator Dodd]

A number of people, including some members of your Committee, have asked me about the proposed restrictions on bank trading in derivatives as set out in Senator Lincoln’s proposed amendment to Section 716 of S. 3217. I thought it best to write to you directly about my reaction.

I well understand the concerns that have motivated Senator Lincoln in terms of the risks and potential conflicts posed by proprietary trading in derivatives concentrated in a limited number of commercial banking organizations. As you know, the proposed restrictions appear to go well beyond the proscriptions on proprietary trading by banks that are incorporated in Section 619 of the reform legislation that you have proposed. My understanding is that the prohibitions already provided for in Section 619, specifically including the Merkley-Levin amended language clarifying the extent of the prohibition on proprietary trading by commercial banks, satisfy my concerns and those of many others with respect to bank trading in derivatives.

In that connection, I am also aware of, and share, the concerns about the extensive reach of Senator Lincoln’s proposed amendment. The provision of derivatives by commercial banks to their customers in the usual course of a banking relationship should not be prohibited.

In sum, my sense is that the understandable concerns about commercial bank trading in derivatives are reasonably dealt with in Section 619 of your reform bill as presently drafted. Both your Bill and the Lincoln amendment reflect the important concern that, to the extent feasible, derivative transactions be centrally cleared or traded on a regulated exchange.

These are needed elements of reform.

I am sending copies of this letter to Secretary Geithner
and to Senators Shelby, Merkley, Levin and Lincoln.

Sincerely

[Signed] Paul.

No matter, then, that securitisation is illegal so that all derivative transactions are likewise illegal under US and Common Law. Neither Paulson nor, it is now clear, Paul Volcker, are in any way concerned about the fact that these transactions are ALL FRAUDULENT.

So far as Mr Volcker is concerned, the banks should be allowed to CONTINUE ENGAGING IN FRAUDULENT FINANCE. Maybe it’s all got too much for the former Fed Chairman.

Alternatively, he may be indifferent to the fact that, with this single letter, he has unilaterally destroyed his towering reputation for integrity and probity.

PUBLIC HAND-WRINGING BY ‘PUT-UPON’ BLANKFEIN
On 7th May, Mr Lloyd Blankfein addressed investors at Goldman Sachs’ Annual Meeting, behind a significant police presence in the street.

Metaphorically holding his hands out to create an impression of penitence, Mr Blankfein promised a ‘rigorous self-examination’ of his firm’s business practices. He would promote ‘ethical principles’, implying that these had been lacking in the past (accurate). An experienced US annual meetings attendee, Evelyn Davis, branded Blankfein as ‘Lord Goldmine’, suggesting that he should resign by Monday 10th May in order to retain ‘what little dignity’ he had left.

Mr Blankfein was forced to field two hours of hostile questioning from disaffected investors at the meeting, amid reports that Goldman has begun discussions with the SEC in pursuit of a possible out-of-court settlement of the SEC’s Civil Case against the firm. But the Civil Case opens up the prospect of multiple litigation against Goldman, including R.I.C.O. suits: so Goldman’s 259 lawyers may have advised the firm to seek an accommodation with the SEC as quickly as possible.

It is probably unnecessary to over-emphasise the obvious point that a financial institution that needs to employ 259 lawyers must, by definition, be accustomed to sailing ‘close to the wind’.

• Such an enormous contingent of in-house lawyers is clearly ‘telling us something’.

BUSH II AND CLINTON CAUTION AGAINST GREED IN CHICAGO
You may now need to have your private vomitarium handy. To complete this account of highest-level financial fraudsters attempting to transform themselves verbally into paragons of rectitude, Forbes magazine reported on 6th May that former President William Jefferson Rockefeller-Clinton and George W. Bush appeared together at a ‘Biotechnology Conference’ in Chicago held between 3rd and 6th May. It was on 6th May that the Settlements payouts were once again aborted, and the sabotage was committed, we understand, via these criminal Presidents’ Mafiosi associates based in Chicago, where the FBI’s Division Five is allied with the underworld.

The gullible or duplicitous Forbes reporter wrote that ‘on a visit to Chicago on Tuesday, I was very encouraged to hear Bill Clinton and George W. Bush deliver [on 4th May] a remarkably non-partisan message to elected officials regarding future regulatory or tax code changes. Speaking at the Bio International Convention, the two former Presidents suggested that legislators recognize the problems and address the greed, but they cautioned against inhibiting capital formation, since Wall Street is where companies find risk capital to develop the innovations that benefit us all’.

‘The forum where they spoke wasn’t open to the public or the press’ [begging the question of what the Forbes journalist was doing there, then], so there was not a peep about it on the 24-hours-a-day news stations. Too bad. It would be nice for people to learn that when it comes to some of the critical issues, politicians may not be as polarized as skeptics suggest’.

Would you like us to summarise what we think of Forbes magazine on the basis of this offering?

• The level of ignorance of the real criminal world displayed by the author of this verbiage cannot be encapsulated in the English language.

• The two self-acknowledged criminal Presidents’ ‘advice’ to Congress to ‘address the greed’ represented a typical example of ‘Blankfeinist’ deceit. Here are two of the greediest individuals who have ever disgraced the American political scene, whose entire existence both in and out of office has been motivated precisely by GREED, suggesting that Congress should ‘address greed’. Do you now begin to understand the true meaning of double-mindedness, which masks such an unfathomable darkness of the soul?

By ‘recommending’ that greed should be ‘addressed’, these inveterate deceivers convey the impression that they disapprove of greed, when greed is what has driven them all their lives.

• The author’s ignorance incorporates a failure to understand that these two criminal finance operatives have all along been in sync as well as rivals, so when they jointly decide to sing a particular song for the benefit of the dumbed-down goyim, they do so for a reason.

• The naive idea that these operatives are principled people of goodwill, when in fact they are egregious serial financial terrorists driven by GREED who should, we are advised, receive the same treatment as Saddam Hussein, tells you that Forbes either looks the other way, or else languishes in a lazy fantasy world which has no observable connection with reality.

THE CHICAGO MAFIOSO FORK POINTED AT OBAMA
President Obama is reported to rely on five people, of whom four are from Chicago, where Obama knows how ‘the system’ works and is believed to be familiar with the notorious Drake Hotel, where the Mafiosi meet and do their deals with the compromised and blackmailed official structures. They are Rahm Emanuel, his abrasive Chief of Staff, David Axelrod and (until recently) Valerie Jarrett, and Michelle, while the fifth kitchen cabinet member is Robert Gibbs, his chief spokesman.

In Chicago, an early Obama supporter was Alderman Edward Burke, first elected in 1969, who runs the Chicago show for Mayor Richard Daley and chairs the city’s Finance Committee.

To cite the City of Chicago’s website: ‘As Chairman of the City Council’s powerful Committee on Finance, Alderman Burke holds the city’s purse strings and is responsible for all legislative matters pertaining to the city’s finances, including municipal bonds, taxes and revenue matters. Alderman Burke became Chairman for the second time in 1989. He previously served from 1983 to 1987’.

In 2001, the Daily Herald reported that Burke was an early supporter of Mr Rod Blagojevich’s campaign to become Governor of Illinois. On 10th February 1985, a Chicago Tribune article reported how a Chicago mobster, Victor Albanese, wound up on the city payroll, asserting that Alderman Burke performed a favour for John D’Arco, a Democratic Committeeman, by hiring the mobster as a ‘ghost employee’, on $900 a month.

John D’Arco was identified by a former FBI agent, William Roemer, as being a co-opted member of the Chicago Mafia, also known as ‘the Outfit’. At one time, John D’Arco was Chicago’s First Ward Alderman, but was forced to step down after the FBI caught him at a meeting with the ‘Outfit’ boss, Sam Giancana, near Chicago’s O’Hare Airport. D’Arco has been one of Alderman Edward Burke’s links into the Chicago ‘Outfit’.

Another link between Alderman Burke and the Chicago Mafia was Alderman Fred Roti, who died in 1999, who was the most powerful Chicago City Alderman in the 1980s.

In 1989, The Washington Post reported that the former FBI agent, William Roemer, had identified Fred Roti in March 1983 as the ‘Outfit’s’ operative on Chicago’s City Council in testimony before the United States Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. In 1991, the US Attorney General identified Roti as a member of the Chicago Mafia. In 1999, the US Justice Department described Fred Roti as the Chicago Mafia’s ‘patronage boss’, elaborating as follows:

‘Fred Roti was convicted of RICO conspiracy, bribery and extortion regarding the fixing of criminal cases inside the Circuit Court of Cook County, including murder cases involving organized crime members or associates and was sentenced to 48 months’ imprisonment. Roti was released from prison in 1997. As First Ward Alderman, Roti was a key political patronage boss and, along with his codefendant Pat Marcy, a fixer for the Chicago Outfit. Roti has directly participated in interfering with the rights of the members of LIUNA (Laborers’ International Union of North America) in the selection of their officers and officials in that he has improperly influenced the selection of officers of CIDC (Chicago Laborers’ District Council) and has been responsible for the pervasive hiring of LaPietra crew members and associates at the Chicago Streets and Sanitation Department. Roti is a made member of the Chicago Outfit’.

Alderman Burke, Obama’s champion, regularly met Roti at the Counsellors Row Restaurant across the street from Chicago City Hall. It didn’t bother Alderman Burke that Roti was a mob boss. On the contrary, shortly after Roti’s death, Burke sponsored a City Council resolution honouring Roti’s life, which read as follows [bearing in mind that the phrase ‘family members’ has a double meaning in this context]:

‘Fred B. Roti, a committed public servant, a cherished friend of many and a good neighbour to all, will be greatly missed and fondly remembered by his many family members, friends and associates’.

On 22nd April 2010, Sam Adam Esq., an attorney for Rod Blagojevich, filed a motion in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division before Judge James B. Zagel, for the Court to issue a trial subpoena to President Obama concerning the disgorging of redacted portions of all tapes and sealed information released under a Protective Order dated 14th April 2009 concerning the scandal surrounding the appointment of Mr Obama’s vacant Senate seat by Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich [CV 08CR888].

Without going into the convoluted detail of the corruption implied by the Motion, its text states [paragraph 8] that ‘President Barack Obama has stated publicly that he was “confident that no representatives of mine would have any part of any deal related to this seat”. [Press conference by President-elect Obama, 11th December 2008]. The word ‘deal’ is defined by the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary as a ‘transaction; bargain; contract; an arrangement for mutual advantage’.

Paragraph 9 of the Motion continues:

‘Yet, despite President Obama stating that no representatives of his had any part of any deals, [a] labor union president told the FBI and the United States Attorneys that he spoke to [the] labor union official on November 3, 2008, who received a phone message from Obama that evening’ and that Obama had recommended Jarrett as his Senate replacement.

The case is much more complex than this, but the general flavour can be obtained, for instance, from Pagaraph 14: ‘President Obama has direct knowledge of allegations made in the indictment [against Blagojevich]. In addition, President Obama’s public statements contradict other witness statements, specifically those made by [the] labor union official and Senate Candidate B. It is anticipated that [the] labor union official will be a witness for the Government’.

‘His accounts of events directly related to the charges in the indictment are contradicted by President Obama’s public statement’.

Paragraph 20 reads: ‘President Barack Obama has direct knowledge of the Senate seat allegation [‘deal’]. President Obama’s testimony is relevant to three fundamental issues of that allegation.

First, President Obama contradicts the testimony of an important Government witness. Secondly, President Obama’s testimony is relevant to the necessary element of intent of the defendant. Thirdly, President Obama is the only one who can say if emissaries were sent on his behalf, who those emissaries were and what, if anything, those emissaries were instructed to do on his behalf. All of these issues are relevant and necessary for the defense of Rod Blagojevich’.

Other dimensions involving Obama’s ‘former’ Chicago (mobster) friend Tony Rezko are also raised in the Motion, which also points out that as all these matters occurred prior to President Obama’s Inauguration, none are covered by Executive Privilege.

Paragraph 31: ‘[Federal precedent holds that] no person, even a President, is above the law and that in appropriate judicial proceedings, documents and other tangible evidence within the very office of the President may be obtained for use in those judicial proceedings. Similarly, where the President himself is a percipient witness to an alleged criminal act, the President must be amenable to subpoena as any other person would be’.

Paragraph 32:

‘Here, President Obama is a critical witness. All of President Obama’s testimony would entail evidence he witnessed before he became President and does not involve Executive Privilege’.

ONGOING BLACKMAIL OPERATIONS TARGETING OBAMA TO PREVENT HIM SETTLING
What is the relevance of all this in our broader context? What has been summarised above is evidence of Obama’s Chicago Mafioso connections and background. The whole point about Obama, and why he surfaced in place of Hillary Clinton, is that he can be blackmailed on several levels simultaneously. The best known dimension is the birth certificate/legitimacy issue, which could be used at any time for that purpose.

But an even more potent prospective blackmail dimension is the Chicago ‘Outfit’ connection and background. The Chicago operative Rahm Emanuel was installed as White House Chief of Staff in order to ensure the continued leverage/effectiveness of this prospective blackmail dimension – the objective being to intimidate and control the new President so that he could be relied upon to continue blocking the Settlements payouts (involving many trillions of dollars) in conformity with the Bush-Clinton criminal fraternity’s intention to hold on to what they have stolen, to crash the system and thereafter to pull the off-balance sheet funds onto the ‘books’ buying up the world’s real assets at firesale prices. That is what is in process, and what the Mafiosi have in mind.

Rod Blagojevich’s Motion to subpoena President Obama emerged from a separate blackmail operation against Obama mounted by Blagojevich himself, who is in fact a minor serpent in the Chicago snakepit. More to the point, both Clintons and Joseph Biden were and remain involved in this operation to control Obama by means (as we suggested a long time ago) of blackmail. And it was out of Chicago that George Bush Sr. pulled off the ransacking of Continental Illinois Bank & Trust Company, where the Delmarva funds were placed, where FBI Division Five runs its main criminal operations, and which handles and controls the felon and money thief, Wanta.

DOCUMENTS PROVE ROUTINE COLLABORATION BETWEEN C.I.A. AND ORGANISED CRIME
Documents obtained by this service in the course of research into the Japanese gold buried in the Philippines (‘Yamashita’s gold’) PROVE direct ongoing intense collaboration between the Central Intelligence Agency and the Mafia. One diagram shows that there was (and remains to this day) a division of labour, with the CIA (Intelligence Power) managing, coordinating and manipulating the cooperation of the banks, Lloyds of London and other domestic and foreign institutions, while the mafia is shown as responsible for enforcement of the movement of the ‘recovered’ (i.e., re-stolen) gold to designated refineries and recipients.

There is no question but that this cooperative model applies across the board, not just in the context of moving gold. In other words, the US Intelligence Power works hand-in-glove with organised crime, the capital of which is Chicago. We are now in a position to PROVE this with documents and will do so in due course.

Which means that, supping with the Devil, the Intelligence Power is irreparably criminalised; and since it has long since usurped the Executive Branch (and the other two branches of the Federal Government, more or less), the consequence is that the United States has a criminal government, is driven by organised criminal priorities (Chicago), and is therefore a menace to civilisation.

Needless to say, this state of affairs could not be more perfect from the perspective of the criminal intelligence organisations serving foreign powers bent on the destruction of the United States, of which the ‘Black’ pan-German DVD, and its nefarious French counterparts, are these days by far the most insidious. Nor can ANY reliance be placed upon Chinese undertakings any longer, as we are led to believe that recent developments demonstrate that, while currently sweet-talking the British Monarchical Power, Chinese intelligence elements are simltaneously doing ‘deals’ with Bush Sr.

Any party stupid enough to believe that ‘deals’ can be done with the head of the serpent is in very urgent need of brain surgery. George Bush Sr. and his filthy apparat double-cross EVERYBODY. It is a complete waste of time seeking accommodating with this serpent, who, we are being told by transatlantic phone, should be shot dead on sight immediately, as he is determined, like Sampson, to ensure the ruination of the entire US and global financial economies if he can’t get his way.

EXPOSURES FORCING AMERICANS TO RECOGNISE THE PERILS OF C.I.A. CRIMINALITY
The forces of law and order, and of the Rule of Law and the Constitution, have woken up to this catastrophe so late in the day that they are engaged in a terrible struggle to decapitate the serpent before it destroys the United States and the Rest of the World as it persists in seeking to retain the upper hand. As we have repeatedly seen, crushing the head of the serpent is no easy task – not least because the serpent has beguiled gullible, naïve and ill-informed foreigners, including some ancient European powers which spawned the serpent in the first place (Britain, France, Germany).

The good news, as we have often pointed out, is that because the serpent’s arrogance was such that it never anticipated the remotest possibility of real resistance to the outpouring of its sewage, it has been caught off-balance – and has never recovered from the shock of being faced down. Recall the scripture that we have often cited in the past [John, Chapter 18, verses 1-6]:

‘When Jesus had spoken these words, he went forth with his disciples over the brook Cedron, where was a garden, into the which he entered, and his disciples.

And Judas, which betrayed him, knew the place: for Jesus ofttimes resorted thither with his disciples.

Judas then, having received a band of men and officers from the chief priests and Pharisees, cometh thither with lanterns and torches and weapons.

Jesus, therefore, knowing all things that should come upon him, went forth, and said unto them, Whom seek ye?

They answered him, Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus saith unto them, I am he. And Judas also, which betrayed him, stood with them.

As soon then as he had said unto them I am he, they went backward, and fell to the ground’.

This is what happens when you stand up to these people on the basis of solid faith. They cannot believe that anyone could have the temerity to stand in their way.

MEANWHILE THE SINISTER ‘OFFICE OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH’ IS STILL IN THE WORKS
As discussed in the report of 27th April, the ‘Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010’, introduced by Josef Stalin’s grandson (Senator Christopher Dodd) in the US Senate under the geomasonic number S. 3217 (which, according to the esoteric Babylonian numerological drivel and gobbldegook to which these serpents are bound, devolves to their ‘magic’ number 13 (3+2+1+7 = 13)), provides for the establishment of the sinister intelligence unit called the ‘Office of Financial Research’ within the US Treasury – to which all key financial powers will in practice be delegated, enabling the Treasury to continue sponsoring Fraudulent Finance operations beneath the radar with selected corrupt counterparties, with no checks and balances whatsoever.

This all-powerful intelligence unit will be equipped with powers to destroy any entity, whether overtly operating in the financial sector or not, and whether based domestically or abroad, on an arbitrary basis, the blanket cover being that the targeted entity will be deemed to be an actual or prospective threat to the security of the United States (meaning Fraudulent Finance).

POWERS TO TAKE DOWN ANY ENTITY ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD
Since US corporations and financial enterprises, handling dollars, litter the whole world, what this means in practice is that the decadent US dollar will be propped up by this ‘hidden’ arbitrary power buried inside the Treasury. Any corporation handling US dollars could be targeted. As the Office of Financial Research will have unlimited arbitrary powers (more of which may be buried within the pages of the colossal draft Senate Bill that have not been published), it will certainly be equipped with all means necessary to destabilise and destroy entities that it considers to be a threat to the security of the United States – which, in translation, means: threatens the open-ended perpetration with the US Treasury’s connivance, of Fraudulent Finance operations, including securitisation and the proliferation of derivatives ‘products’ based on NOTHING. This explains why Paul Volcker has sacrificed his reputation for integrity, as exposed above.

The US Treasury will therefore be able, with no checks and balances, to implement by stealth an arbitrary pan-German-style ‘coup d’état by installments’ (5).

On 7th May, The Wall Street Journal reported that, following pressure from the Deputy Treasury Secretary, Neal Wolin, and the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, Dr Ben Bernanke, an amendment or provision sponsored by Senator Bernie Sanders which would have exposed certain US Federal Reserve decision-making to Congressional auditors, and which would therefore have largely repealed a 32-year-old law shielding Federal Reserve monetary policy from Congressional auditors, was watered down. Dr Bernanke wrote to the Senate Banking Committee Chairman, Mr Dodd, stating that the Sanders measure would ‘seriously threaten monetary policy independence, increase inflation fears and market interest rates, and damage economic stability and job creation’.

This is the standard Fed response to any attempt to prise open its secrecy culture – which masks its illicit financial transactions, creative accounting, operations with corrupted foreign central banks via the Federal Reserve Inter Bank Settlement Fund, and secret deals with the Treasury.

DESPERATE E.U. MEASURE TO ‘SAVE THE (PAN-GERMAN) EURO’
INCOMPATIBLE WITH SAVING THE FAILING SATRAP E.U. ‘MEMBER STATES’
Before we learned that $1.0 trillion had been stolen from the Gold Badge Paymaster as described above, the following ‘straight’ analysis of the European ‘bailout’ operation had been prepared for this report. We leave this text intact, but you should bear in mind the further, sinister dimension elaborated above, when considering what follows. If you read this carefully, you will see that none of this is actually inconsistent with what is reported higher up this analysis. All that was agreed was an intention to ‘create’ a bail-out fund, begging the question: how would this be financed. Mention of the International Monetary Fund is also consistent, as the Fund suddenly expanded one of its facilities from $50 Billion to $500 billion, as we reported earlier, in April, almost certainly covering the placement of a counterparty $500 billion in IMF accounts ‘lifted’ from the Settlements funds.

On the European stage, 16 ‘Member States’ of the European Union Collective ended a 14-hour overnight session at the European Commission (a criminal enterprise: see our report dated 2nd May 2010) in Brussels by ‘agreeing’ to ‘create’ a fund worth some 750 billion Euros ($962 billion), incorporating backing from the International Monetary Fund, to the satrap ‘Member States’ facing financial instability, while the European Central Bank tore up its rulebook, by stating that it will buy up official and private sector debt.

Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, the former Secretary of the Agitation and Propaganda Department of the Young Communists at Marx-Lenin University, led the chorus, backed by little José Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission, in proclaiming that this outcome confirmed that ‘we will do ANYTHING IT TAKES to support the Euro’.

OPEN-ENDED E.U. LIABILITY POTENTIALLY IMPOSED
UPON BRITISH TAXPAYERS EVEN THOUGH BRITAIN IS BUST
Now the Brown Government hastened to ‘ratify’ the Lisbon Treaty, which provides that decisions of this nature are taken by ‘Qualified Majority’, meaning that no satrap ‘Member State’ can veto such decisions of the Collective. Which in turn means that Britain, the Government of which is financially strapped as never before in its history thanks to the permissive cack-handed mismanagement of Gordon Brown, who clings to office in Downing Street, will be called upon to help finance bail-outs for ‘Member States’ which discover that they cannot survive if bound to the Collective Currency régime, which is ‘irrevocable’ under the 1992 Maastricht Treaty – that is to say, they are stuck with the wrong rate of exchange until the end of the solar system.

Therefore, on top of the financial burdens that will have to be borne by the British taxpayer due to Brown’s irresponsible stewardship of the financial economy for generations to come, money will have to be conjured up out of nowhere to help bail out ‘Member States’ the economies of which are being systematically destroyed by their Governments’ brainwashed idolatry of membership of the EU Collective (EUdolatry).

Taken to its logical conclusion, this means that the British Government (when one exists) attaches greater importance at all times to not offending the EU sacred cow, than it does to the welfare of the people of Great Britain. In other words, the interests of the British people are being sacrificed on the altar of the corrupt god of the pan-Germans; while the dense political UK Establishment and the brainwashed Whitehall bureaucracy, wedded to EU membership because they lack the smarts to distinguish between ‘cooperation’ and collectivisation, persist with their sterile internationalist agenda contrary to the wishes or interests of the British people.

OUTGOING LABOUR GOVERNMENT CORRECTLY REFUSED TO GO ALONG
To give the outgoing Labour Government its due, Aleister Darling, the former Chancellor of the Exchequer, refused to go along with any pledge to make available a huge sum of money for the so-called EU bail-out plan. This was perfectly correct, as the Chancellor, like all his colleagues, was denuded of all powers and was merely in situ pending a political resolution. But Europeans, led by the French, not understanding this, or not wanting to bother to try to understand the true situation, responded with an outpouring of vituperative hatred along the lines of ‘when you’re in trouble, don’t come begging to us. Rely on God instead’. Lovely people these EU ‘colleagues!

A piece of work by the name of Jean-Pierre Jouyet, Chairman of the French Financial Services Authority, said: ‘The English are very certainly going to be targeted given the political difficulties they have. Help yourself and heaven will help you. If you don’t want to show solidarity to the Eurozone, then let’s see what happens to the United Kingdom’.

OUTCOME OF THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION: TEMPORARY CHECK MATE
It is hard to imagine a recipe more likely to morph into a pretext for the wholesale overthrow of the complacent and self-satisfied British political and bureaucratic Establishment. We have obtained a glimpse of the instability to come following the inconclusive outcome of the General Election held on 6th May 2010, following years of Brown’s financial mismanagement and parliamentary sleaze.

The Conservatives could have won the election with an overall majority had they not long since decided to pretend that the issue of Britain’s hugely expensive and sterile relationship with the European Union Collective, involving the illegal remittance of Value Added Tax receipts to the European Commission, a criminal enterprise given that its accounts have been explicitly NOT approved by the Luxembourg-based Court of Auditors for the past 14 years [report of 2nd May 2010], is a non-issue for public consumption and electoral purposes.

Calculations based on votes cast prepared by the former MEP for South-East England, Ashley Mote, have revealed as follows:

• The Conservatives could have had a comfortable working majority if they had made an unequivocal commitment to a referendum on British membership of the EU.

• The UKIP (United Kingdom Independence Party) vote, favouring a much harsher policy towards Britain’s sterile EU participation, would have collapsed and, while not every one of the 25 seats listed below might have been delivered to the ‘Conservatives’, they would have emerged with a working majority of about 40.

In the following table of constituences where the ‘Conservatives’ came second, the first number shown represents the winner’s majority, and the second number shown represents the UKIP vote:

Bolton West 92 901
Derby North 613 829
Derbyshire North East 2445 2636
Dorset Mid 269 2109
Dudley North 649 3267
Great Grimsby 714 2043
Hampstead and Kilburn 42 408
Hull North 641 1358
Middlesbrough South 1677 1881
Morley and Outwood 1101 1506
Newcastle-Under-Lyme 1552 3491
Norwich South 310 1145
Oldham East 103 1720
Plymouth Moor 1588 3188
Rochdale 889 1999
Sheffield Central 165 652
Solihull 175 1200
Somerset and Frome 1817 1932
Southampton and Itchen 192 1928
St Austell and Newquay 1312 1757
St Ives South 1719 2560
Swansea West 504 716
Walsall North 990 1737
Walsall South 800 1711
Wirral South 531 1274

Additionally, the Conservatives should have won Wells, which was lost to the Liberal Democrats with a majority of 800. But the UKIP vote was 1711; so including the promise of a referendum on Britain’s continued sterile membership of the EU could have secured this seat as well.

The Guardian reported on 8th May 2010 that ‘UKIP’s bid to beat the Speaker’ (who is traditionally unopposed by the main parties) in Buckingham, ended in third place. Lessons for the Conservative right, there, perhaps, if they think they can win by tacking to the extremes’.

But the data displayed above reveal that this assessment is the very reverse of the truth. If the ‘Conservatives’ had accommodated the known preferences of adherents of the United Kingdom Independence Party, they would have achieved a comfortable working majority and would not have found themselves on the edge of a deep abyss, as was the case as this report closed.

GORDON BROWN RESIGNS: CAMERON GOES TO THE PALACE
After days of horse-trading, it transpired that the Labour Party could not reach agreement with the Liberal Democrats. Faced with this situation, Mr Gordon Brown revised his intended resignation scenario this evening (11th May) and resigned immediately. As this update is being added, David Cameron has entered Buckingham Palace and is seeing Her Majesty The Queen who is appointing him Prime Minister. At the time of writing, no details of the composition of the new Government are forthcoming. For numerous observers, this is an unexpected development, after many days during which the impression had been formed that the British political impasse resembled ‘check mate’.

• The reasoin for the ‘unexpected development’ is alluded to in the Update above.

WELCOMING CAMERON, OBAMA PRAISES
THE ‘SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP’ HE TRASHED EARLIER
As is well known, President Obama and some of his associates have gone out of their way to trash and ridicule the so-called ‘Special Relationship’, which is a myth desigend to bamboozle the Brits into believing that the United States is the United Kingdom’s most reliable ally: whereas the reality, as is being stripped down to bare metal ‘as we speak’, that the United States remains in thrall to the criminalised Intelligence Power which is controlled and corrupted by the decades-old pan-German penetration alluded to in these reports.

Therefore, the news that President Obama called David Cameron as soon as he stepped into Downing Street to congratulate him on becoming Prime Minister and to pour praise over the so-called ‘Special Relationship’ went down like a thousand lead balloons (as opposed to points of light) in certain London quarters. What this man says usually diverges from what he does. But what this does again illustrate is the brazen gall that these controlled people have when they contradict themselves, on the assumpting that everybody has forgotten what they said earlier.

• It’s called ‘dialectical doublemindedness’. Or Leninist ‘contradictions’.

Notes and References:

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
(1): From our report dated 27th April 2010 [Archive]:

THE NSA/CIA/USAF HANDLER OF WANTA’S PROMOTER
As these exposures have unfolded, this Editor has been viciously attacked from time to time by a notorious controlled US fabricator and peddler of gross lies on behalf of Wanta, styling himself as an ‘intelligence expert’, named Thomas Heneghan. We have reported separately that Heneghan was authorised, by Wanta, according to documents we hold, to open one or more bank accounts for Marvelous Investments, a vehicle reportedly used inter alia for the financing of Al-Qaeda.

Thomas Heneghan’s disinformation handler is NSA/CIA/USAF Lieutenant General Otis C. Johnson. Concerning this proven criminalist operative (Johnson), The SEC News Digest dated 21st May 1986 reported [page 1] as follows:

Complaint Filed against Otis C. Johnson: The Los Angeles Regional Office [of the SEC] filed a complaint on May 6 in the US District Court for the District of Colorado against Otis C. Johnson seeking a permanent injunction and other equitable relief for violations of the antifraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The complaint in question alleges that Johnson defrauded N.D. Resources, Inc. (NDR) and its public shareholders. Specifically, the complaint alleges that Johnson provided NDR with a false geological report concerning certain mining claims and, after NDR had entered into a joint venture with an accomplice of Johnson in order to develop the claims, conspired to provide positive drilling reports to NDR when, in fact, no drilling had been done. The complaint further alleges that Johnson sold approximately 240,353 shares of NDR common stock while the stock price was inflated as a result of press releases issued by NDR concerning the drilling reports. [SEC v. Otis C. Johnson, DCO, Civil Action NO 86-945 (LR-11105)].

The SEC News Digest dated 10th July 1989 reported [page 1] as follows:

Otis C. Johnson enjoined: The Los Angeles Regional Office announced that on June 22 Judge Lewis T. Babcock, US District Court for the District of Colorado, signed an Order of Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief against Otis C. Johnson. The Order enjoins Johnson from future violations of the antifraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Order directs Otis C. Johnson to disgorge his profits from sales of N.D. Resources, Inc. (NDR), which disgorgement is waived based upon the truth, accuracy and completeness of Johnson’s sworn representations concerning his present inability to pay disgorgement. Johnson consented to the Order without admitting or denying the allegations of wrongdoing in the Complaint.

The Complaint alleges that Johnson defrauded NDR and its public shareholders by, among other things, providing NDR with a false geological report concerning certain mining claims and further conspiring to provide positive drilling reports to the company when, in fact, no drilling had been done, and by selling approximately 240,353 shares of the company’s stock while the stock price was inflated as a result of press releases concerning the drilling reports. [SEC v. Otis C. Johnson, DCO, Civil Action No. 87-B-1693 (LR-12149)].

The SEC News Digest dated 24th August 1992 reported [page 4] as follows:

Otis Johnson III Pleads Guilty: The Commission and Michael J. Norton, US Attorney for the District of Colorado, announced that on July 20, 1992, Otis C. Johnson III (Johnson) of Denver, Colorado, pleaded guilty to two criminal informations. The first such information, filed May 20, 1992, charged violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, conspiracy to commit mail fraud and securities fraud in the purchase and sale of the securities of Corporate Quest, Inc. (Corporate Quest). The second information, filed July 20, 1992, charged violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, conspiracy to commit mail fraud, wire fraud, and interstate transportation of stolen property, in the purchase and sale of the securities of United Financial Operations (United Financial).

Johnson admitted in his plea agreement that in 1987 and 1988 [that] he participated in schemes to manipulate and conduct fraudulent transactions in the securities of United Financial and Corporate Quest. Johnson also admitted that he and co-conspirators conducted prearranged trades through controlled and nominee accounts and paid for the trades in Corporate Quest’s securities with worthless checks totaling approximately $313,000. As a result of the co-conspirators’ activities, four brokerage firms lost approximately $262,000.

Johnson is scheduled to be sentenced on September 21, 1992 at 9:00 a.m. [U.S. v. Otis C. Johnson III, Criminal Action No. 92-CR-181, U.S.D.C. Colo. (LR-13345)].

• NSA/CIA/USAF Lieutenant General Otis C. Johnson III did NOT do jail time.

• The penalty for wire fraud in the United States is TWENTY YEARS PER COUNT.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
(2): We reproduce herewith again, for convenience AND EMPHASIS, the entire text revealing the Halliburton scamming operations published in our report dated 2nd May 2010, taken originally from our report dated 26th May 2008 [Archive]:

EXPOSURE OF HALLIBURTON’S SCAMMING OPERATIONS: 26 MAY 2008
The following description of the pit of corrupt degradation known as Halliburton is excerpted from our report dated 28th May 2008 [ARCHIVE]. It reflects the detailed inside knowledge of a fearless and serious-minded whistleblower. [Note: The narrative as partially reproduced here starts ‘out of context’. However you can pick up such context as is necessary to be in a position to comprehend the cess-pit of degradation that is being exposed, as you read into the excerpt]:

THE HALLIBURTON DRUG THUG AND THE STOLEN FEDERAL SALARIES SCAM
A former top CIA aide to Tenet and 30-year CIA veteran now reveals the criminal background of ‘HallCIA’, the thug who yanked the officer’s phone from the wall, ransacked the CIA operative’s office, had the officer incarcerated in Halliburton’s own cell in the basement of CIA headquarters and on a separate occasion punched holes in the officer’s office wall, displayed episodes of extreme violence and was observed by many to be high on drugs. He was also a murderer….

This was the criminal whom Cheney asserted to be a friend who could never be arrested. This description leads into a summary of another scam, whereby multiple salaries are paid into corrupt Halliburton employees’ secret Swiss bank accounts:

‘HallCIA’ and the Head Programmer were moved back to Halliburton’s main office, just like the priests sexually abusing children are moved to a different parish.

They were never prosecuted…

[Dressed in FBI uniform provided by Halliburton, the operative is engaged in an FBI action to arrest this Halliburton thug], He was arrested for FIRST DEGREE MURDER OF AN FBI OFFICER. I had proof that the FBI officer that he had murdered was a bona fide one with proper papers and vetting in the FBI’s personnel archives. The FBI had fingerprint and DNA evidence to prove that the Halliburton programmer was the murderer.

They even had a trial and a conviction of the man for that murder.

He had feigned a fainting episode right before the reading of the sentence and been taken to a hospital. He then assaulted the hospital guard inside his room and left him unconscious in his bed. Then he impersonated the guard using his uniform. He later went to a lawyer who put in a motion to declare the trial a mistrial on the grounds of a technicality: the defendant had not been present at the reading of the sentence. The fact that the criminal had committed a second nearly deadly assault the same day in apparent good health, was omitted from that motion.

The FBI-clandestine CIA raid that I organized was on the private flat of ‘HallCIA’. It was not at his house where he lived with a prostitute whom he pimped, according to a CIA file. He did not keep his contraband items there as there were too many unsavory people coming through his house.

WHAT THE FBI FOUND IN THE CIA-HALLIBURTON DRUG THUG’S APARTMENT
At the flat the FBI confiscated drugs in pusher quantities and also illegal weapons, including some unregistered machine guns, explosives and hand-held artillery that could blow big holes through a wall for illegal entry. He had one bedroom devoted just to weapons, with shelves devoted to about half-kilo packages of drugs. It was equipped with a padlock. CIA top secret documents were strewn all over the bed, dresser and floor of the master bedroom.

It looked like a hurricane had hit the bedroom even before we arrived. The padlock was broken on the door to the weapons and drug room and the door was open when we arrived. But all the drugs were still neatly on the shelves. The flat may have been raided by Russian intelligence before we arrived, leaving the CIA documents behind as cover-up after copying them.

The FBI collected fingerprints and I collected the CIA documents. After the raid I returned to the FBI station and filled in the appropriate forms to write a FBI report up on the raid. As I was doing so, the two FBI officers who I had spoken with two days before walked by the desk I was using. They did a double take seeing me in the FBI uniform…. I told them that I had just tested FBI vetting and security procedures for a report I was writing for the CIA. I also explained to them that I had just successfully impersonated an FBI official to the extent of going on a raid with them, and not one had yet asked for my name or run it through a background check. I showed them the CIA top-secret documents the raid had netted and they laughed at the ruse I had played on the FBI.

They were not laughing, however, when I explained how I had gotten that FBI uniform and signed the papers. They checked on their computers; I was not yet registered on the records of the FBI.

I asked them to arrest all of the appropriate Halliburton people involved in that scam. They called the Director of the FBI and I also spoke to him. He refused to authorize the arrests.

He told me: ‘Write up your report and let me read it first’. I offered to drive over immediately with the evidence. He refused to make any time to see me. I immediately faxed him a short report and enough evidence to warrant the arrests. Nothing happened.

MULTIPLE SALARIES PAID INTO SWISS BANK ACCOUNTS
But the next day when the local FBI checked my name again, they called me to let me know that I was officially part of the FBI now per their computer. I promptly sent in a full report to the FBI, the CIA, and the Pentagon on this scam to sign up Halliburton employees as their officers and have the US taxpayer pay their salaries. Just like Halliburton over-billed, some Halliburton employees were
collecting THREE US Government salaries; one from the Pentagon, one from the FBI, and one from the CIA. I wrote in my report that I had signed up in all three places via Halliburton’s scam to see how long it would be before those scams were stopped.

I put on the three forms, separate Swiss bank accounts. The point was to use the accounts as evidence of Halliburton corruption when those cases came to trial; I have not touched a cent of that money. The Directors of the FBI, the CIA, and the Chief of the JCS that I sent those reports to did not implement my list of recommendations; one of them was to shut down all of those public salaries going to Halliburton employees. At least, they had not been implemented as of about Summer 2004 when I last checked those accounts.

Another recommendation was to make sure that everyone in those agencies is properly vetted and drug tested as per that agency’s usual security measures. Because I was concerned that my clear recommendations would not be acted upon, I despatched copies of those letters, the forms that I had signed, and the numbers of the Swiss bank accounts to the GAO. In my covering letter to the GAO I told them that I had given them the authority to check the balances in those accounts by written authorization to the Swiss bank.

I had hoped that seeing US taxpayer’s money streaming into those accounts would give them an incentive to prosecute those cases promptly. Since the banks were not in the United States, I doubt that coercion applied to the bankers will erase those accounts, but I could be wrong. Since I had long been a covert CIA person, those communications with officials and the banks were under aliases. The GAO however has all of the proper information to check those accounts again and to prosecute these cases. I myself no longer remember any of the aliases and account numbers, so I
couldn’t access that money even if I wanted to. I never intended to use that money at all, so I did not record those aliases and numbers into my personal effects.

In 2004 when I checked the accounts, I did so from within the CIA by pulling up the report that I had written to the DCI. I have no way to check those accounts now so I do not know whether that scam, as evidenced by a single person’s accounts, has been stopped. When I checked in 2004, two years had already passed. The US taxpayer had paid [as follows]: via the CIA, about $80,000.00 each year, for a total of about $160,000.00; via the FBI, about $50,000.00 each year, for a total of $100,000.00; and via the Pentagon, about $80,000.00 each year for a total of about $160,000.00, or roughly $420,000.00 total into those three Swiss accounts…

I also checked on whether Halliburton continued paying those employees if it signed them up for a Federal salary. The answer was no, except for rare exceptions. ‘HallCIA’ had continued receiving a Halliburton salary while getting one at the CIA, but the Head Programmer had not.

When I checked in 2004 the number of Halliburton employees getting a CIA salary was over 200, the number receiving an FBI salary was over 400, and the number of Halliburton employees receiving a Pentagon salary, was over 300. Suppose that the total for that is about 1,000 salaries each at, say, $50,000 a year. That would mean that the US taxpayer was being bilked (by Cheney) of $50 million a year of fraudulent salaries. Over the eight years that this Cheney has been in the Vice President’s office, that could easily add up to $400 million in savings for Halliburton in not having had to pay salaries. No wonder it was so easy to get that FBI uniform and salary sent out to me by talking to a Halliburton VP. Other Halliburton programmers had complained to me that they took a ‘cut in pay’ to work at the CIA location. They said that ‘the takings are good’, and ‘Halliburton fences the items for us in a 50-50 split’.

HALLIBURTON’S THIEVES INSIDE THE CIA AND THE INEVITABLE CONSEQUENCES
When I heard that Halliburton’s people were stealing from inside the halls of the CIA, loud alarm
bells went off inside my head. The items inside the CIA which were easiest to carry out were of course its documents.

And any computer that one stole inside the CIA was likely to have top-secret information on it, in spades. It was a counterintelligence person’s nightmare, and now it was mine. The fact that the Head of the Halliburton section offices at the CIA had just sold the CIA’s communication satellite encryption security codes to Moscow burned in my mind.

The Russians had paid him $20,000 for that betrayal.

He had no clue as to their black market value. It made me worry that the Russians and the Chinese could buy every secret inside the CIA for a price that they could afford. More than one Halliburton person inside the CIA had admitted to me that they were stealing to make up for their cut in pay. Halliburton had switched them to Federal salaries, making the CIA pick up the tab [see above].

One Halliburton person at the CIA had told me that they were all stealing enough to make up for that cut in pay. [They were ONLY in it for the money: taking their cue from Cheney and Bush: Ed].

Therefore, the first thing I did was to find out what those 40-odd people used to earn at Halliburton. I had the CIA’s accounting office print out for me what the CIA was now paying them. My mouth then dropped open in shock. Each one of them would have to steal over $10,000 worth of CIA secrets or goods a year to break even. In some cases the cut in pay was much higher. One man took a $50,000 a year cut in pay when he switched to the Federal salary. At the average $23,000 cut in pay, the 40 workers together had sustained a $920,000 cut in pay. I had been told that Halliburton was fencing the goods in a 50%-50% split. So, about 2 million dollars’ worth of good at black market prices would be stolen from the CIA, if they actually made up their lost salaries stealing.

[There followed a summary of the notorious Aldrich Ames, Clyde Conrad, Larry Wu-Tai Chin, John Anthony Walker, and Robert Hanssen espionage cases, omitted here]

On February 22, 1994, Ames and his wife were formally charged by the United States Department of Justice with spying for the Soviet Union and Russia. Mr Ames could have faced the death penalty, since his betrayal had resulted in CIA ‘assets’ being killed. However, he received a sentence of life imprisonment, and his wife received only a five-year prison sentence for her conspiracy to commit espionage and tax evasion as part of a plea bargain by Ames.

TENET AND CHENEY REFUSED TO ADDRESS THESE ISSUES
I walked down to the office a very high-ranking CIA analyst, about third in the hierarchy in that department, a man I trusted. People advance inside the CIA by one of two means normally, being very good at what they do or being very good at lying to please those above them. The heads of each section were often in the latter category, as a general rule. I asked him how many secrets the Russians could buy for $2 million a year, if they had 40 moles able to walk the halls of the CIA. In the posing of the question I explained that the hypothetical moles would be assumed to be ‘efficient’ criminals without formal espionage training. I asked him what effect that would have on national security. He asked me if this was a conversational gambit or a request for a formal report to answer my question. I thought about it a moment and then said the latter.

That meant that I had to go get a signature on a form. By submitting to Mr Tenet new requests for 10 separate reports on a wide variety of important topics, I quickly brought the analyst the signed form that he needed. He whistled in surprise when he reviewed the assignment given to him there in black and white. Then he asked me ‘Is this about the Privatized Employees’ invasion of the CIA?’ I said yes. He said: ‘I have been urging Tenet to let us study that risk for months. No go. How did you get this when I couldn’t?’

I explained to him my method and also that the Head of the Halliburton group had just sold the CIA’s Communication Satellite Encryption Security Codes to the Russians.

He hadn’t heard that [because] Tenet had put a lid on it even within the CIA. I promised to show him the proof. I came back and gave him and a few of his top staff an hour long briefing on what I had learned. One man was actually in tears as I finished.

Another said: ‘This marks the end of US national security’. Another said, ‘No. US honor died already and no memo was sent announcing its funeral’.

I asked them what information they needed to make a proper assessment. They said that it would help them if I could find out how much the 40 people were actually making off their thefts inside the CIA, and a list of what they were stealing. I came back the next day with the list of how much each one had been paid by Halliburton in ‘bonuses’, which was the code word for fenced items, and what each ‘bonus’ was for. That list of what each bonus was for was like what the programmers really did in morphing an appliance rack into a bread slice rack. It was not a specifically accurate description but it related to the item in a fairly straightforward way.

CHENEY WAS INFORMED IN A RECORDED PHONE CALL
I showed the list to Tenet and tried to brief him on how dangerous it was.

He did not want to hear. Tenet had not followed my recommendations, which would have stopped the thefts. And he did not want further reasons why he should do so… I called Cheney and begged him to send a memo over to Halliburton setting up a program to [address these extremely serious issues]. I even faxed him a memo so that all he had to do was sign to get that to happen. He did not deny that Halliburton was selling items stolen from the CIA. He did not deny that he had the power to impose the necessary changes at Halliburton by sending the memo. He did not deny that he had the power to order Tenet to institute effective measures to stem the tide of the thefts.

As the phone recording of that call shows, I kept briefing him on the problem while he kept saying that he refused to discuss the matter with me.

I sent a copy of that call over to the GAO because it showed that I had in fact managed to inform Vice President Cheney of the seriousness of the thefts. In that call [to Cheney] I cited that the likely consequences were the shredding of US national security and the wholly unnecessary deaths of its covert personnel. I also set up a surveillance operation behind Cheney’s and Tenet’s back to actually inspect each item that Halliburton fenced from the CIA.

COUNTERINTELLIGENCE OPERATION AGAINST TENET AND CHENEY BACKFIRES
That is, I had an ex-CIA operative with counter-intelligence experience whom I trusted, apply to Halliburton. I instructed him to offer to ‘help them fence their CIA goods and get higher prices for them’. Call him Alan for short. A Halliburton VP, the same one who sent me the FBI uniform, sent me a ‘thank you’ letter for referring Alan to them. He no doubt believed that I was corrupt and making a kickback. It was to my advantage to foster that image of myself without it actually being true. In my position it was best if everything I did could be interpreted as corrupt at the same time that I was collecting the evidence for prosecution.

That operative, Alan, ended up terribly overworked in no time. The analysts and I had been off by a factor of THREE in the amount that was routinely being stolen by Halliburton from the CIA.

We did not find that out until the Halliburton people realized that they could get more money by making sure that Alan sold the goods for them. That meant Alan had to sell them at on average much higher than twice what they could get for them themselves, even by selling directly to the Russians. That was not as hard as it would have been with regular stolen goods; the Halliburton people did not know their true worth on the black market. Alan could make a better profit selling a document to a rich government such as France, which would have been very bad in the hands of the poorer Chinese or Russians. Before that, Halliburton had sold mainly to the Russians. [Editor: Further allegation that Halliburton has sold CIA secrets to the Russians].

The French were very helpful to us in keeping many things out of the hands of the Russians. They had wised up quickly as to our problem and how to assist us. The United Kingdom was less helpful because they could get that same information by merely filing a request for it.

The French were not as tight into the CIA, though they were still US allies. We needed top dollar for the stolen items because we had to make up for the fact that we were not selling off all of the items due to their national security risk. We were hiding the fact from Halliburton’s management that we were really sending the items back to the CIA.

OVER 50% OF HALLIBURTON SALES BREACHED NATIONAL SECURITY
We could not send computers back, as it was impossible to ensure that the Russians etc. had not altered them in the meantime. Those had to be scrubbed clean using a special erasing procedure. But it was possible to send back documents. We had initially thought that it would be only 10% of the items that had to be vetoed on national security grounds. But as we got a better understanding of what was being sold via Halliburton, that figure went up to a little over 50%

[Editor: More damning allegations against Halliburton as a continuing threat to US national security. George W. Bush authorised this grotesque corruption and treachery via his Executive Orders].

[The high-level operative and source for this information left the CIA for Canada in 2002].

Subsequently, operatives working inside the CIA to address this catastrophic situation] demanded that Tenet should lock the unvetted people out of the building.

In the process of showing how serious the security violations were, they revealed the oversight (or counterintelligence) operation against Tenet and Cheney themselves. That ended up revealing that they were recovering about 50% of the items and about 30% of their black market worth. Tenet informed Cheney of that fact, and Cheney ordered an end to the oversight.

I later sent copies of the relevant telephone calls revealing all this to the GAO. The Russians and Mossad had a complete set of White House calls, including of [calls concerning what was] for sale. The CIA also had a fairly complete set. When I was forced back into the CIA in October 2003 from Canada with threats and worse, I heard about the troubles that the oversight people had suffered over the intervening 16 months. They had been unable to perform oversight for four months.

During that time Halliburton had fired their Private Eyes, the ex-CIA operatives that they had there. Instead, Halliburton had hired its own experts on Black Market Intelligence Pricing and had sold all of the stolen items without regard to US national security. I then despatched over to the GAO about a dozen phone conversations by Halliburton’s high officials demonstrating their reckless disregard for national security and the lives of covert operatives. [Therefore, this information is all available for the Congressional Committee to access immediately: Editor].

But it now gets much, much worse….

THEFTS OF CIA COMPUTERS LEADING TO AN UNIMAGINABLE CATASTROPHE
The next part of the narrative briefing leads into a description of the most ghastly consequences, for which Vice President Richard B. Cheney is clearly indicated by the narrative to be responsible, given his Luciferian greed for ‘profit’ which of course is on its own an impeachable offence:

It was only after a [hitherto unreported: Ed.] colossal national security catastrophe that the [CIA operatives who had carried on trying to get results] managed to get Tenet to insist that Halliburton rehire their ex-CIA ‘Private Eyes’. The oversight people briefed me on [the catastrophe] as soon as I returned. The first day I came back to the CIA’s Headquarters, they kept me up all night telling me about it. I cried many times that night for my country and for the harm that had been done to her. I cried for the people who had died so brutally and unnecessarily.

Many, many more intelligence professionals lost their lives as a consequence of Cheney’s selling secrets than lost their lives because of the traitorous behaviour of Aldrich Ames. Ames is serving a life sentence for what he did. Cheney’s Halliburton people were still working at the CIA and were still stealing there because of Cheney’s protection of them. They were still walking inside the halls of the CIA every day and going into its offices to ‘have a chat’.

It was such an egregious violation of national security that some oversight members quit the CIA. Others said to me: ‘Why should we look like criminals who are enabling this theft’? ‘We are not making a cent off it… Yet we have been threatened by Tenet that we will be put in prison because we know of the thefts and hence must be guilty of them… We are being treated like criminals because we are trying to stop the most dangerous of these sales’.

[Editor: Gross abuse by Tenet of the Misprision of Felony Statute].

I later collected a memo from Cheney to Tenet which stated that the oversight of the sales by the CIA was cutting into profits and had to be stopped. It recommended imprisoning all of those in the CIA suspected of being a bottleneck in [the raking in of] US corporate profits. Tenet prohibited the oversight within a week of receiving that memo. The GAO has a copy of the memo and also of the memo that Tenet sent out threatening imprisonment if anyone was discovered to have decreased US corporate profits. They also have the later memorandum that Mr Tenet sent, which threatened imprisonment if anyone knew about stolen goods and did not report it to the designated official.

Those who had reported thefts to that official had been fired soon afterwards.

Thieves do not report stolen goods; people with integrity do, until it is clear that it is pointless and dangerous to do so. I also sent the GAO the document suggesting this ruse of a new designated official as a way to stop the oversight. That designated official never prosecuted a case of theft against a Halliburton person. He came from Halliburton! He had in fact been recommended for the job by ‘HallCIA’ to Cheney, who then recommended him for the job. I sent over to the GAO a tape of the phone conversation between ‘HallCIA’ and Cheney. On it. ‘HallCIA’ says that the man that he is recommending will stop the losses of revenues ‘from our CIA sales’.

HALLIBURTON CROOK BRAGGED ABOUT LUCRATIVE SALE TO THE RUSSIANS
Later he bragged about one of his sales to Russia of ‘one of our CIA products’, and says, ‘too bad we can’t make more of them’. It was clear that he was referring to the stolen goods that Halliburton stole from the CIA, not products that Halliburton made and sold to the CIA. The designated official was not vetted by the CIA. He was stealing from the CIA while working out of the Halliburton offices. I sent to the GAO a signed statement from a CIA security guard who caught him carrying a computer of the CIA’s out of the front door. That man could have employed the back door out of their offices manned only by Halliburton’s guards. He was so used to stealing from the CIA and getting away with it that he forgot, and used the front door.

That is what he told the guard: ‘I forgot… Give me a hand and we’ll take it out the back door’. The Halliburton guards did just that. They helped the Halliburton thieves load CIA computers into their private cars. I sent the GAO several CIA security camera clips of that happening.

The CIA had massive amounts of security camera data showing that [activity]. The CIA security people were afraid to report the thefts that they saw, because they did not want to lose their jobs without it even cleaning up the problem. By the time I returned to the CIA, 16 people had lost their jobs due to reporting thefts to the designated official that Tenet’s memo had directed them to use. No one at the CIA knew about the item sold during the blackout that caused the national security catastrophe, until after the catastrophe happened. [Details of this national security catastrophe, unfortunately containing graphic and disturbing language, now follow].

THE CATASTROPHE, COURTESY OF THE CORRUPTION OF TENET, CHENEY AND BUSH
The first sign of that Catastrophe [with a capital C: Ed] was a dead body lying on a sidewalk in a foreign city. The body had been the teenage daughter of a CIA officer. The body was no longer recognizable, even by her father. The body was identified definitively by dental records. Her face had been peeled off in small strips. The forensic evidence revealed that she was still able to bleed and struggle during most of the time that was done to her.

The next sign of the Catastrophe was another unrecognizable body. This time, of a 6-year-old boy of a US diplomat. The injuries were the same. The CIA concluded that the murderer was the same man. The next sign was an 11-year-old child of a US school teacher in Africa. She was divorced and her husband had once worked for the US State Department. Perhaps he had been CIA under diplomatic cover, but the CIA refused to comment.

I saw the photographs of the dead bodies. They were too horrible for words. Could it be that I was recalled to the CIA against my will in order to get my special operational skills to track down the villain? The day I got back to the CIA, the first thing Tenet did was hand me these pictures and ask me to find The Killer. He had given me the pictures of 23 victims who had all died the same way. All
of them were children of people who could have been in the CIA. About 22 of them did have a
known parent or guardian in the CIA.

DEATHS DUE TO THE STEALING OF A CIA COMPUTER
What he failed to tell me, or give me the photos for, for was the over 100 adults that had been killed using the exact same modus operandi. One of them was in the CIA’s morgue at that moment [Editor: did you know that the CIA has its own morgue? I didn’t]. ..The item that was stolen from the CIA that was responsible for those deaths was a computer. That computer had not gone through the hands of one of the ex-CIA operatives. Its contents not been thoroughly erased.

It took work and time to do that; the disc had to be erased and written over 50 times. Halliburton’s bosses did not care about national security or the risk to the CIA’s covert operatives, if they were exposed… I was able to prove that it was the same computer. It still had the CIA’s personnel files on it and many of the victims had been selectively deleted from where they should have been in that list. When I then compared that file to the CIA’s current personnel file, the comparison program marked those deletions in red. The selective deletions showed that the owner of the computer was getting tipped off by someone high up in the investigation of the deaths inside the CIA.

The US Administration managed to suppress the news of these murders almost completely, after its ties to the computer started showing up in the CIA’s internal investigations. No-one in the media had connected the isolated cases across the globe [another gross failure by the incompetent and controlled Fourth Estate, which has intelligence cadres sitting in its press rooms: Ed.].

The motivation of the deletions was obviously to try to cover-up the guilt of the owner’s role in those murders. There were about 86 deletions in a file of thousands of names. Each deletion was a victim, as already known by the CIA up to a certain date about two weeks earlier.

ENTER THE ‘DARK LORDS’: DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO BUSH
No victim that the CIA had on its investigation list by that point had failed to be deleted on that stolen computer. The odds of that happening by chance alone was practically speaking, exactly zero. In addition, I later obtained evidence that firmly tied the secondary ownership of that same computer to those who committed the actual tortures and murders. There was many more than one murderer. What they had in common was membership in a kind of paramilitary, quasi-religious cult. The members of that paramilitary cult had a group commitment to kill a person once a month. The Mafia usually only requires its members to kill once to get into it. This satanic group required their members to kill once a month in order to remain in good standing in it.

[Note: The Editor of this service received, between February and mid-May 2008, a large number of evil, unsolicited phone calls from a contrived, deep demonic ‘voice’ referencing ‘the Great Dark Lords’. This harassment [referenced in our report dated 27th April 2010, as the stupid harassment resumed: we have identified the operative concerned as Wanta] continued until shortly after we reported the matter to the head of the US Anti-Terrorism Task Force and also, separately, to law enforcement personnel in contact with the Editor’s own contacts, whereupon they ceased. We have voice recordings of almost all these calls.

Considered in the context of what follows, it would appear that these calls represented threats: one of these was quite specific, along the lines of ‘we have the means of dealing with you’. Given the appearance of the ‘Dark Lords’ in this ‘Cheney’ context, it is likely that the Unterreichsführer’s apparat will indeed, as we suspected, have been responsible for these multiple telephone threats and harassment calls.

It comes as NO SURPRISE whatsoever to the Editor that the veteran CIA investigator came across this ‘Black’ dimension. The harassment calls to the Editor were also interspersed with threatening emails. The content of one of these, containing a very grave threat, was conveyed immediately as referenced above, with the consequence that (at the date of this posting) the harassment ceased].

A Manual on ‘How to Please the Lords of Darkness’ had been published by a member of that cult. It recommended that the best way to do it was to torture people to death using the modus operandi that I have indicated above. That Manual had been distributed by the owner of the aforementioned computer with that CIA Personnel file suggested as the targets. The man who bought the computer was indeed a paramilitary type, with a large collection of weapons, many of them unregistered… He was identified as a fundraiser for Bush.

The literature of the group showed upside-down crosses as an emblem [satanic symbolism: Ed.]. The reason that others in the CIA had not tracked him down and had failed to pin the instigating of the murders on him, was political. Like ‘HallCIA’, and the Head Programmer from our earlier cases, he was well protected. It was not that CIA investigators had not suspected him. It was that they did not know what to do with their suspicions and even their evidence after they got it.

I was the booby prize winner: the fool at the CIA who had before been willing to buck the silence at great risk to myself. There was precedence for giving me a job like this. At one point, a CIA officer had sold a list of MI6 officers to the KGB during the Cold War. The KBG had started killing them off. I was given the job to stop them from continuing. And they had stopped: whether or not it was due to my efforts, was a matter of hot debate within the CIA. But some people credited me with having had some influence in the matter.

The individual who bought that computer was apparently a friend of Cheney and Bush; they had invited him to the White House. They had been present when he picked it out among a number of other CIA stolen computers, paying cash, which Cheney had put in his pocket.

‘CHENEY & BUSH TOOK THE MONEY FOR THE COMPUTERS USED FOR THE MURDERS’
I found the White House Security camera footage of that event. The GAO has a copy of it. The payment is shown on the video. The man took hundred dollar bill(s) out of his pocket and handed that to Bush. Bush hesitated and then handed the money to Cheney. The footage of that computer being carried out of the room by a guard follows about 20 minutes later. The room had about 20 computers from the CIA in it, to start with. [They were all neatly laid out, as at a corporate sales demonstration, for buyers to examine, test, select, and pay for: only cash was accepted: Ed.].

The security camera tape shows Bush Jr. and Mr Cheney repeatedly coming into the room with a prospective buyer and taking cash in varying amounts. That continued until all the computers were gone. Some prospective buyers remained in the room for over an hour exploring the contents of the stolen CIA computers, before deciding on a purchase. I checked with the CIA and found that no CIA vetting of those buyers had occurred. Most did not have security clearances. Some of them had prior felony convictions and had been allowed into the White House ‘on orders from above’. The sale was ‘by invitation only’, with Bush and Cheney controlling the invitation list.

The earlier tape shows Cheney directing Halliburton employees in where to set the computers up. Much care and time was taken to plug them in and connect them to monitors, mice, keyboards, and to arrange the room nicely with a mouse pad under each mouse. The GAO has a copy of that tape too. The manual on how to torture people (in the manner described) and the file of CIA Personnel was sent overseas and domestically through the mail whenever a buyer purchased a snuff film from that man. His poorly kept records showed that he had mailed out at least 2,000 such CDs with the Manual on ‘How to please the Lords of Darkness’.

His records omitted the addresses that he sent them to in about 50% of the cases where he marked payment received and product and ‘How-to’ sent. Thirty of the murders had been solved already by local foreign authorities by the time I was given the case. Of those, the ‘How-to’ CD was found in 28 of them. Presumably it had been overlooked in the other two, or the wrong party may have been charged, or the ‘How-to’ thrown out by the ‘Black’ criminal operative.

Unfortunately, the murders had continued after those arrests.

BUSH AND CHENEY RESPONSIBLE FOR 168 CIA DEATHS, COVERED UP (HITHERTO)
At least 168 CIA officers and their family members were brutally tortured to death as a direct result of this cynical corruption run by Bush and Cheney. The CIA [systematically] covered it all up and pretended that it never happened on Tenet’s orders. The notorious traitor Aldrich Ames had not
sent out instructions to torture and kill anyone. He had sold ONE copy of a list of CIA operatives
in one country to one buyer. He is languishing in prison for life.

[The perpetrator identified here] sent out over 2,000 copies of all the names and addresses of the CIA officers and their families in every country. He had sent them out with hate propaganda and incited others to kill them. He had sent this [Nazi filth] to people who were known murderers who had a commitment to kill again. And he had sent it out as a challenge: are you man enough to kill a CIA person? His group offered ‘Advanced Membership Privileges’ to anyone who succeeded.

It was very curious that someone close and high up in the investigations at the CIA was tipping him off, since he was targeting CIA officers. I was able to supply the GAO with the evidence as to who was doing it. This person was getting calls and faxes directly from Cheney and Tenet. Tenet’s faxes included the names of the victims to date. He was being assisted in his cover-up at a very high US level. I investigated whether the Russians or another foreign group had put him up to this, as his methods seemed too effective to be that of an individual’ alone.

HALLIBURTON LINKED TO THESE MURDERS OF CIA PERSONNEL
I found no such evidence of a foreign government or its operatives being behind it [but] I found many ties to US underworld organizations. Most of the ties, however, were directly to Halliburton. According to Halliburton’s records which I sent the GAO, [the perpetrator of these incitements to murder CIA personnel] had headed one of their subsidiaries before it went bankrupt.

CIA INVESTIGATOR TOLD TO ‘BACK OFF, OR ELSE’
When I looked up that old corporation I did not find a building on the aerial to correspond to the address. That subsidiary had been selling intelligence and paramilitary gear. It had specialized in recruiting mercenaries worldwide. It made me wonder if those killing the CIA had done so, as a kind of recruitment test; those getting away with it and being able to prove it, getting the job. I started looking into whether he was on Halliburton’s books as CEO of a new subsidiary. Just as soon as I started that investigation, Cheney called and told me to ‘back off or else’.

I asked him what the ‘else’ referred to, because it certainly sounded like a death threat to me. He hung up on me. Then he called me back about 10 minutes later and offered to set up a face-to-face meeting with that computer owner. I agreed and asked at once for a time and a place. He hung up: apparently his offer was just to threaten me that he would [impose] that man on me. I sent copies of those calls to the GAO also. They should still have them. The Halliburton mercenary recruiter [who incited the murders] was never prosecuted. Cheney and Bush would not allow it.

BIO-FEEDBACK EQUIPMENT STOLEN BY HALLIBURTON FOR THE RUSSIANS
In about May 2002, a Halliburton person at the CIA had stolen an expensive piece of equipment.
It was an ultra-sophisticated CIA bio-feedback machine that was worth over $5 million.

It had required hundreds of millions of dollars of R & D money for the CIA to develop it. It was custom-made only for the CIA. Its only purpose was to train operatives how to pass a lie detector test. It was only used when they were to be sent on extremely dangerous missions to places like Russia. And it was only used in very critical missions.

There was a high risk that Russian intelligence would figure out how to overcome that training, if they interrogated about five operatives who had used it. That is, if they realised that those 5 had been trained in that fashion. Thus it was TOP SECRET and its manual was also top secret at the time. Loss of that machine and its Manual was the same as potentially losing every secret a given CIA official had in his or her mind when they were in Russia. The head of the CIA station in Russia had been trained on that machine for obvious reasons.

The effect of the training was to give the user control over their automatic nervous system. That meant that they could stop their fear, their sweating, their heart rate increase etc. in response to an interrogation. In addition to those obvious advantages in an interrogation situation, it had a big psychological benefit. It gave those who had used it confidence that they could pass a lie detector test. Thus, they were as if ‘bullet proofed’ against threats and lie detector tests.

Although the signal-to-noise ratio relating to information obtained under torture is so low as to be unusable, that is not true in a ‘friendly’ interrogation. The British had admirably demonstrated the effectiveness of ‘friendly interrogations’ in WWII. An operative who had fear or fear of a lie detector test was more likely to ‘tell all’ in a ‘friendly interrogation’ because of underlying anxiety. I did not find out about that theft until the next day. I then learned from a Halliburton person that it had been stolen and was en route to the Russian Embassy to be sold to them. I was absolutely horrified by the national security implications of that. I rushed up to Tenet’s office to tell him. He already knew.

Cheney had called him and asked him what it was and what it was worth to the Russians. This was after I had set up the system for things to go through Alan so that the oversight committee could intervene to stop the worst violations of national security.

But the thief was a personal friend of Cheney’s and had taken the item straight to the White House to ask him if he wanted to buy it. Cheney had paid him $50,000 for it, he informed me. The copy of the telephone call that I sent to the GAO between Tenet and Cheney showed that Mr Cheney had considered keeping it, so that he could pass lie detector tests.

CHENEY THREATENS TO KILL THE VETERAN CIA OPERATIVE PERSONALLY
They had discussed it and Tenet had promised to find out more about it, how it worked, and how much it was ‘worth outside of the CIA’. He had called him back and told him a figure of $1.2 million. Cheney asked him to find out what was his risk of needing the machine himself. Tenet called him back and said that CIA analysts judged his risk to be about 4%. In front of Tenet with his phone on
speaker, I called Cheney and demanded its return.

He laughed and said, ‘What’s the big deal? It can only be used 5 times total and it has already been used once. We should sell it while it still has value before those 5 times are up’. He had absolutely no understanding of intelligence matters. It was not 5 uses of the machine: it was 5 times a CIA person trained using that machine was interrogated by the Russians. It could be 20 years’ worth of use to prevent the loss of security codes, national secrets, and how a CIA station was operating.

I explained it all quite carefully as Cheney is not a technically minded person. I even asked him questions to make certain that he had understood what I said correctly [Editor: This interesting comment suggests that Cheney is actually not that bright, which may also be judged to be the case, given his behaviour over the Settlements and his repeated thefts of gigantic sums of money. It may be that he progressed to these much larger thefts after getting away with multiple lesser thefts of which examples have been given in this narrative]. Cheney then said: ‘Well, what difference does it make since there are remote viewers like you in Russia who can steal the secrets anyway?’

I then explained that remote viewers were not 100% accurate and that intelligence agencies always had to verify what they said using hard data. Lie detector tests are not 100% accurate either, but they add some signal-to-noise benefit. Mr Cheney replied that torture was generally worthless in getting information [Editor: Amazing! Was not Cheney reported to be adamant that torture MUST be used to extract intelligence from terrorists and from prisoners in US hell holes like Gantanamo and Abu Ghraib?]. That was true. But it was still wrong to sell the Russians the CIA’s very best and most advanced equipment to deter loss of information under interrogation. ‘Friendly interrogations’ do yield valid intelligence.

When I pointed that out, Cheney said that the machine had already been sold to the Russians and that I was too late. I told him that I would figure out some way of prosecuting him, if he ever did that again. He laughed and said, ‘You haven’t got a chance’. I told him that I would try.

Cheney then said: ‘I will kill you myself, if you ever get close to succeeding’.

As we have said before, Cheney is what Malachi Martin would have called ‘perfectly possessed’.

RUSSIA TREATED AS ‘THE ENEMY’ THROUGHOUT: RAPPROCHEMENT IS THEREFORE FALSE
You will have noticed that during the timeframe of this narrative [2002-2005-ish], Russia is considered in this dialogue to be an enemy, just as was the case during the overt Cold War.

This reflects the fact that the dialectical breach created by Lenin’s Revolution and its aftermath has not, in fact, been healed or discarded: exactly as the Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn advised the disinterested CIA: see The Perestroika Deception by Anatoliy Golitsyn, edited by Christopher Story, available from the books [Edward Harle Limited] segment of this website.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
(3): Reproduced from our report dated 2nd May 2010 [Archive]:

THE TEXT OF MR HENRY A. WAXMAN’S LETTER TO MR DAVID J. LESAR, C.E.O. OF HALLIBURTON CO., DATED 30TH APRIL 2010, DEMANDING ALL DOCUMENTS.

HENRY A. WAXMAN, CALIFORNIA, CHAIRMAN
JOE BARTON, TEXAS, RANKING MEMBER
COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE
Congress of the United States
House of Representatives
2125 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515-6115

Majority: (202) 225 2927
Minority: (202) 225 3641

April 30, 2010-05-04

Mr David J. Lesar
Halliburton Co.
US Corporate Headquarters
3000 North Sam Houston Parkway East
Houston, Texas 77032

Dear Mr Lesar

According to a report in The Wall Street Journal today, one possible cause of the explosion that destroyed the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig and led to the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico could be a problem with the cementing that was supposed to seal the well. In this procedure, cement is used to plug the well and to fill gaps between the well pipe and the hole drilled into the ocean floor in order to prevent combustible oil and gas from escaping.

Problems with the cementing process have frequently been identified as causes of oil well blowouts. The article quoted one independent expert who said: “The initial likely cause of gas coming to the surface had something to do with the cement” (1). Halliburton Co. provided cementing services for the Deepwater Horizon rig.

As part of the Committee’s investigation into the cause of the oil spill, we ask that you take three steps. First, we request that you arrange a briefing on May 5, 2010, for the Committee staff with Halliburton officials knowledgeable about Halliburton’s cementing activities at the Deepwater Horizon oil rig.

Second, we ask you to provide the Committee with all documents in Halliburton’s possession relating to (1) the explosion at the Deepwater Horizon rig; (2) the possibility or risk of an explosion or blowout at the Deepwater Horizon rig; and (3) the status, adequacy, quality, monitoring, and inspection of the cementing work relating to the Deepwater Horizon rig.

We request that you provide these documents on May 7, 2010. An attachment to this letter provides additional information on how to respond to Committee document requests.

Third, we ask that you preserve for potential future production to the Committee all documents relating to Halliburton’s operations at and involvement with the Deepwater Horizon rig.

We appreciate your assistance with the Committee’s investigation. We believe it is essential that the spill and its causes are thoroughly investigated. If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact Meredith Fuchs of the Committee staff at (202) 226-2424.

Sincerely,

[Signed]
Henry A. Waxman, Chairman

[Signed]
Bart Stupak
Chairman, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations

Enclosure.

cc. The Honorable Joe Barton, Ranking Member
The Honorable Michael Burgess, Ranking Member,
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.

(1) Drilling Process Attracts Scrutiny in Rig Explosion, The Wall Street Journal, April 30, 2010.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
(4): Text of the Memorial Notice for John Hemenway Jr,
reproduced from our report dated 2nd May 2010 [Archive]:

HEMENWAY: JOHN MARTIN HEMENWAY (Age 47) On April 30, 2010 of Bedford, VA. Beloved husband of 7 years to Stephanie; loving father of Andrew Branham Hemenway; devoted son of John and Betty Hemenway; beloved brother of Catherine and Edward Siewick, Jane and John Sullivan, David and Margaret Hemenway and Fielding Williams. Pre-deceased by his beloved sister Mary Joyce Hemenway Williams. Also survived by many loving nieces, nephews, relatives and friends.

Memorial Service on Tuesday, May 4, at 4:30 p.m. at Otterville United Methodist Church, Bedford, VA. In lieu of flowers memorials may be made to the John M. Hemenway Camp CHILD Scholarship for special needs children c/o Bedford Primary School, 807 College Street, Bedford, VA 24523.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
(5): ‘Thirty Days: Hitler’s Thirty Days to Power: January 1933’, Henry Ashby Turner, Jr., Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, New York etc., 1996, ISBN 0-201-40714-0, page 164. ‘Coup d’état by installments’, precisely accurate characterization of pan-German power-grabbing methodology. Konrad Heiden, Der Fuehrer, Boston, MA, 1944, page 597.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
THE FOLLOWING DATA HAS BEEN PUBLISHED AT THE FOOT OF MOST OF THESE REPORTS FOR THE PAST THREE YEARS++: COMPILED BY U.S. SECURITIES EXPERT MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S..

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
NOTICES:

BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time AMENDING AND INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE. In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

Advertisements

RETROSPECTIVE ATTEMPT TO VARY A COURT STATEMENT

cropped-chrisstory

PERJURY IMPLICATIONS OF OPERATION TO RE-WRITE WANTA’S LEGEND

Thursday 25 February 2010 15:14

(1): THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CONSIDERED AT THE ALEXANDRIA COURT
HEARING ON 19TH OCTOBER 2007: POSTED HERE ON 24TH JUNE 2007 WHEN FILED(2): MOTION TO DISMISS OF RESPONDENT: FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND:

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

• See also: Legal moves to sue those blocking the Settlements: 7th February report [Archive].

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION
The Editor has received a large volume of emails from all over the world enquiring why there has been no report since 12th February, whether the Editor is well, whether he has been ‘got at’ or liquidated, whether he has been prevented from reporting, and many other solicitous and kind observations. Thank you all for your concern for the Editor’s welfare, which is VERY genuinely appreciated (and completely undeserved!)

There are three main reasons why we didn’t report for a while after 12th February:

• First, we have the practical matter and obligation to publish our journals, and we were heavily engaged in passing a very large issue of International Currency Review [Volume 35, Numbers 1 & 2], for press. When one is passing page proofs for press, nothing else can be allowed to get in the way, or mistakes are made which can be disastrous. Moreover the forthcoming huge issue is of exceptional importance as it will provide, as the preceding issues have done, a permanent record of the recent stages of the financial corruption crisis, and of the reprobate intransigence of the highest-level perpetrators, which therefore cannot ever be expunged.

That is the whole point. They cannot rewrite history because our printed reports on the financial corruption are and will continue to be lodged in libraries, institutions, agencies, corporations, and elsewhere all over the world. And there is NOTHING THEY CAN DO ABOUT IT.

In addition, we have been completing a large issue of Economic Intelligence Review, which contains inter alia, an extensive analysis demonstrating conclusively that SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. LAW. A summary of this analysis will be posted prior to publication.

• Secondly, following the report dated 12th February, the lid blew off the cauldron. Since the purpose of these reports is first and foremost to help to procure compliance and fulfilment with financial obligations (rather than specifically to provide an information service), there are times when it is more helpful to remain silent. This was the case after the lid blew off the cauldron.

We couldn’t cause another lid to blow off because the lid had already blown off, if you understand the point here. One doesn’t publish for the sake of it: one publishes so as to produce results, and to expose iniquity. There remains plenty of iniquity to expose, so our service on that score will be resumed at the appropriate time soon. It hasn’t been appropriate to elaborate any further YET on the content of the report dated 12th February, as we have been waiting for ‘consequences’.

• Thirdly, there is an operation to VARY COURT-DEPOSED FACT, and to substitute FABRICATION for the same. We wanted also to see quite how far this desperate rearguard CIA operation to snub the Court would be pushed. The answer appears to be: as far as possible.

Therefore, this report deals with this specific issue, on which we will NOT need to elaborate. We won’t be able to place this in context, if you don’t know the context.

Without going into further details, the attempt to vary the Court record is associated with:

• An arrogant assumption that the content of the Court-deposed Petition has been ‘forgotten’.

• An apparent attempt to provide a basis for the diversion of funds (which cannot succeed).

PURPORTED VARIATION OF COURT DEPOSITION
An Internet operation has been mounted by US operatives and disinformation hacks recently which appears to seek to VARY the substance of the Petition/deposition made by Mr Leo/Lee Wanta for consideration by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Alexandria.

This Petition was the subject of a hearing in the Alexandria Court dated 19th October 2007, attended inter alia by the Editor of this service.

Detail published in the Internet reports referenced above contains fabrications and diverges from the substance of the Petition presented for consideration by the Court. Any legend which deviates from the language and meaning of the Petition could be viewed as representing a felony against the Court as it would be implied that petitioner lied on the stand.

Petitioner informed the Court [see below] that he had been fully advised by counsel of the seriousness of the claim of making false statements to a Court and was fully apprised of the consequences for committing perjury (and the associated penalties).

It has of course not escaped our notice that Wanta is not engaged in this operation on his own. Others, with greater presentational ‘skills’, are perpetrating this sterile rearguard CIA fabrication operation. In addition to the evident intent to VARY the substance of information provided before the Court, there may also be an integrated intent to enmesh Mr Wanta himself in perjury: in which case, this operation may also represent a set-up against Wanta (par for the course).

Wanta has been distributing the link to a new ‘slick’ website containing the fabricated variations, under colour of his fraudulent Principality of Snake Hill non-status, using a 202 ‘Telefon’ number provided by the French Embassy in Washington.

We have long since proved, with the imprimatur of the Australian Embassy, Dublin, that there is no Principality of Snake Hill – as reiterated in our reports dated 20th September 2009, 22nd October 2009, 17th November 2009, and 12th February 2010, for example.

However the perpetrators appear not only to believe, consistently with their known contempt for the Rule of Law, that it is permissible to VARY what has been stated in Court, but further to ignore PROVEN FACT as though the email from Ms. Brenda Farrell, of the Australian Embassy, Dublin, had never happened. Wanta’s self-designated Ambassadorship (of the Principality of Snake Hill to the United States), the Snake Hill Central Bank and the Snake Hill Trade Commission, are all proven, defunct fabrications: like the content of the Internet reports seeking to VARY the substance of the following Petition to the Court:

(1): THE ALEXANDRIA COURT HEARING ON 19TH OCTOBER 2007
On the above-mentioned date, the Petition reproduced below was considered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, under District Judge T. S. Ellis III.

Present throughout the day in the back of the Courtroom were the following:

Colonel Dana Wilcox
Mr Michael C. Cottrell B.A., M.S.
Mr Christopher E. H. Story FRSA

Mr Leo/Lee Wanta was called to the witness stand.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Case Number: 1:2007cv00609 – TSE – BRP

Filed: 20th June 2007

Petitioner: Lee E. Wanta

Respondents: Henry M. Paulson, Jr., Robert M. Kimmitt, James R. Wilkinson, Michael Chertoff, Alberto R. Gonzales and Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

Court: Virginia Eastern District Court

Office: Alexandria Office

County: Richmond

Presiding Judge: District Judge T. S. Ellis III

Referring Judge: Magistrate Judge Barry R. Poretz

Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges

Cause: 28: 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant

Jury demanded by: None

Note: This case cannot be sealed until Ambassador Leo E. Wanta has been paid the $4.5 trillion of his Settlement diverted and exploited illegally since June 2006.

The Court has, most unusually, given the Respondents TWO MONTHS to respond.

SIR LEO WANTA’S PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS (1)
The text of the Ambassador’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus follows:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Civil Action no.: 1-07 CV 609

LEE E. WANTA, LEO E. WANTA, AMBASSADOR LEO WANTA (Individually and as sole and exclusive shareholder of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., a Commonwealth of Virginia registered corporation)

Petitioner

v.

HENRY M. PAULSON, JR.
SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY
UNITED STATES TREASURY, and

ROBERT M. KIMMITT
DEPUTY SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY
UNITED STATES TREASURY, and

JAMES R. WILKINSON
CHIEF OF STAFF
UNITED STATES TREASURY, and

MICHAEL CHERTOFF
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, and

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND
DIRECTOR AND/OR MANAGER OF OPERATIONS,
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA

Respondents

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
AND OTHER EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF

A. PARTIES:

1. LEE E. WANTA, LEO E. WANTA, AMBASSADOR LEO WANTA
5516 Falmouth Street
Suite 108
Richmond, Virginia 23230: Petitioner

2. Henry M. Paulson, Jr.
Secretary of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20220: Respondent

3. Robert M. Kimmitt
Deputy Secretary of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20220: Respondent

4. James R. Wilkinson
Chief of Staff
United States Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20220: Respondent

5. Michael Chertoff
Secretary of Homeland Security
Washington, D.C.: respondent

6. Alberto R. Gonzales
Attorney General
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20530-0001: Respondent

7. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
701 East Byrd Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219: Respondent

B. JURISDICTION:

1. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this cause of action pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 85, Section 1361 (mandamus), Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 85, Section 1331, and Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 85, Section 1332.

C. VENUE:

2. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 87, Section 1391, and Title 28 United States Code Chapter 87, Section 1396.

D. STATEMENT OF CLAIM:

3. Mandamus is regarded as an extraordinary writ reserved for special situations. Among its ordinary preconditions are that the agency or official have acted (or failed to act) in disregard of a clear legal duty and that there be no adequate conventional means for review. In re Bluewater Network & Ocean Advocates, 234 F.3d 1305, 1315 (D.C. Cir. 2000); Telecomm. Research & Action Ctr. v. FCC, 750 F.2d 70, 78 (D.C. Cir. 1984).

Mandamus will be granted if the Petitioner shows “(1) the presence of novel and significant questions of law; (2) the inadequacy of other available remedies; and (3) the presence of a legal issue whose resolution will aid in the administration of justice”, see In re United States, 10 F.3d 229 at 931, 933 (2d Cir. 1993).

4. Petitioner has attempted to access monies that were transferred through international bank monetary clearing systems to financial institutions located in the United States of America. The remitting party was the People’s Republic of China, People’s Bank. The remitting party designated that the transferred funds were for the sole and exclusive use and benefit of Petitioner. The foreign entity that originated the inward remittance designated Petitioner as sole and exclusive recipient for the transferred money/financial instruments.

Irrespective of efforts proffered by Petitioner and/or agents and representatives of Petitioner, private and public individuals and entities, prevent Petitioner from exercising Petitioner’s legal right to the use, transfer and unrestricted ability to freely disburse said financial assets. The acts and/or omissions to act by named and unnamed Respondents prevent Petitioner (and others who are ancillary to this cause of action) from paying their respective tax liabilities to both State and Federal taxing authorities.

5. Upon best information and belief the organizations, entities, departments and individuals that prevent and/or restrict Petitioner’s lawful access to said money and securities include but are not necessarily limited to the following:

• Secretary of the Treasury;
• Attorney General of the United States of America;
• Bank of America;
• J.P. Morgan Chase;
• CITIBANK/CITIGROUP/NYC including but not limited to Mr Charles O. Prince, CITIGROUP Chief Executive Officer;
• Goldman Sachs et al including but not limited to past and present management and executive officers and members of the Board of Directors;
• United States Department of the Treasury including but not limited to Secretary
Paulson, Deputy Secretary Kimmitt and other known and/or unknown parties working
directly or under contract with the United States Department of the Treasury;
• Secretary Chertoff, Department of Homeland Security and other known and/or
unknown parties working directly or under contract with the United States
Department of Homeland Security;
• One or more known and/or unknown “compliance officers” that act directly and/or
under contract with private bank and/or security brokerage firms to observe
rules and regulations of the United States Department of the Treasury and/or other
USG investigative and reporting entities;
• Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Virginia.

6. Upon best information and belief Respondent acts and/or failures to act constitute a
violation of the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934 (as amended in 1970), the Bank
Privacy Act and other non-specified banking regulations.

7. Reasonable action has been taken by Petitioner to obtain an explanation and/or under what authority Respondents are not permitting Petitioner to have access to the foreign transferred private business financial assets referenced herein. Despite written notice and request for a response the named parties avoid their legal obligations. In furtherance of this Petition for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus Petitioner directs this Court’s attention to the letters and other communications that have been collectively marked as Exhibits A attached hereto (2) and all of which documents, letters and Memorandum are incorporated herein by this reference as if the same were set out in their entirety in the body of this Petition.

8. The material, substantive and immediate financial loss to the Petitioner resulting from loss of financial benefit can not adequately be addressed in conventional judicial proceedings.

In one or more instances parties in position of knowledge, that can confirm the representations regarding interference in private business dealings, between Petitioner and third parties, have been placed at risk of physical harm by individuals representing to be fiduciaries of one or more of the Respondents. Additionally, the acts and actions of the Respondents prevent immediate payment of Federal taxes in the amount of $1.575 Trillion dollars into the United States Treasury.

E. BACKGROUND:

9. On or about April 15, 2003 the Honorable Gerald Bruce Lee, in Case Number 02-1363-A filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, issued an Order and Memorandum of Opinion for the referenced numbered case. As part of the Order and Memorandum of the Court (in the referenced case) the Court stated that the Plaintiff (in the referenced case) should pursue liquidation of corporations, recovery of financial assets and pay all required taxes in accordance with the law (3).

10. Petitioner initiated contact with numerous third parties, including United States elected, nominated, appointed and career employees plus foreign countries, for the purpose of recovering financial assets.

11. Upon best information and belief in December 2005 and January 2006, Secretary Snow (Secretary of the Treasury at the time) and Chairman Greenspan (Chairman of the Federal Reserve at the time) traveled to the People’s Republic of China.

The Chinese required confirmation of Petitioner’s signature to facilitate cooperation of the Chinese in completing the transfer of financial assets referenced herein. Upon best information and belief Snow/Greenspan determined that Chinese officials had the ability and willingness to cooperate with petitioner in the recovery and transfer of substantial financial assets that had been in the care, custody and control of the Chinese for an extended period of time.

12. Premised on the representations of Secretary Snow and Chairman Greenspan, the legal services of Troutman Sanders, LLP and Jenkens & Gilchrist Parker Chapin, LLP (attorneys) were used to complete the preparation and administer the execution of agreements and documents referred to collectively as “settlement documents”. The following is a compilation of the significant parties that are represented as either obligors and/or beneficiaries of the settlement documents:

• Petitioner Wanta identified in this petition.
• Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (including but not limited to Land Baron/Xeno).
• National Security Agency (NSA).
• Department of Homeland Security.
• Director of National Intelligence.
• United States State Department.
• United States Department of the Treasury.
• United States Department of Defense.
• The White House, including but not limited to the Offices of the President and Vice President.
• C.B.I.C. Inc. (Mr William Bonney Sr.).
• China (PRC), France, Great Britain, Germany and other foreign nations participating under one or more international “Protocol” including but not limited to the Reagan-Mitterrand Protocol agreements.
• Others of interest not intentionally omitted as part of this petition.

The entirety of the financial assets mentioned in the settlement documents prepared by the above mentioned attorneys concerns approximately $27 Trillion United States Dollars in value. The portion attributable and payable to the petitioner is $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars.

13. In May of 2006 the People’s Republic of China caused a free and unrestricted transfer of $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars through international bank fund transfer facilities to an account at Bank of America located at Richmond, Virginia. The designated beneficiary of the transferred funds from the People’s Republic of China was Petitioner herein.

This transfer was made by the People’s Republic of China solely and exclusively as a requirement under the mentioned settlement agreement.

14. Upon best information and belief between the dates of July 31st to August 2nd of 2006 the United States Department of the Treasury, without authorization of either the remitting party or the receiving party removed the People’s Republic of China transferred financial assets from Bank of America Richmond, Virginia to an account in the name of Goldman Sachs at CITIBank New York, New York as the beneficiary holder of the monies transferred by the People’s Republic of China referenced above. This “Chip” (Clearing House Interbank Payment) transfer was facilitated from Virginia domiciled banks to New York domiciled banks via the Federal Reserve Bank Richmond.

The Chip transfer did not remove the name of Petitioner as the intended recipient of the transferred money from the People’s Republic of China. The transfer to the Goldman Sachs et al account at CITIBank put a lawless restriction that the funds were not to be released to Petitioner without the authorization of United States Treasury.

At or about the time of the unauthorized transfer mentioned in this paragraph 14 Petitioner protested the alleged right of “entitlement” by Secretary Paulson and to facilitate protest of right of ownership under the “Securities Acts” accounts were opened in the name of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. at Morgan Stanley, fiduciary client account at CITIBank/NYC to receive direct deposit transfer of Petitioner funds from Goldman Sachs.

15. The Petitioner has been contacted by “Compliance Officers” that are contract employees of the United States Department of the Treasury that the transfer records of the United States Department of the Treasury and the recipient (past and present holder of the funds transferred to Petitioner by the People’s Republic of China) reflect that the accounts opened to receive the financial assets are tagged and coded for the benefit of the Petitioner.

Access to the tagged and coded accounts requires lawless authorization to be provided in writing by Secretary Paulson. To date Secretary {Henry M.] Paulson refuses to provide the required written authorization to the compliance officers.

In addition one or more compliance officer (referenced herein) has been contacted by Secret Service Agents who have advised the compliance officers that the “White House” ordered that the compliance officers cease and desist from communicating in any manner with Petitioner.

16. Upon best information and belief the compliance officers mentioned in paragraph 15 have been in contact with law enforcement officers representing the Central Intelligence Agency and the United States Department of Defense.

These mentioned law enforcement officers confirm that the information provided by the compliance officers is true and correct and that upon best information and belief the “order” preventing Secretary Paulson from releasing the “tagged and coded” funds that are the sole and exclusive property of the Petitioner have been either lawlessly and individually controlled by Secretary Paulson and/or restricted through direct participation by other United States of America elected and/or nominated officials.

17. Upon best information and belief Troutman Sanders LLP and Jenkens & Gilchrist Parker Chapin LLP, seeking legal recourse on behalf of C.B.I.C. Inc. (Mr William Bonney Sr.) and the People’s Republic of China obtained an Order to Show Cause Why a Writ of Mandamus Should Not Be Issued from the United States Supreme Court signed by Justice Ginsberg. The People’s Republic of China, as a foreign government, invoked the original jurisdiction authority of the United States Supreme Court to obtain the document signed by Justice Ginsberg. Upon further best information and belief the responding parties to the action filed in the United States Supreme Court are exercising any and all assumed defenses to ward off the issuance of the Writ of Mandamus.

18. The United States Department of Justice and/or any agency or investigative authority contacted has refused to assist Petitioner in the collection of lawful funds. The said parties refuse such assistance irrespective that there is clear and undisputed evidence that the subject funds are identified in official United States government agency documents as being the sole and exclusive property of Petitioner. As of the date of the filing of this Petition, all requests for payment of lawful funds have been ignored by any and all elected and nominated public officials that have the implied and apparent authority to complete all requirements of the settled documents.

19. Petitioner individually and as sole and exclusive controlling shareholder of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. certifies as follows:

• The Petitioner has personally had conversations with one or more officials at the United States Department of the Treasury and said officials confirm the sequence of events concerning inward remittance of subject funds from the People’s Republic of China and inter-bank transfers within the United States.

• Petitioner confirms that he has personal knowledge about the “Claims and Background” set out in this Petition and verifies upon penalty of perjury that the same are true and correct.

• Petitioner has fully and completely reviewed the content of this petition and certifies by sworn affidavit attached hereto that the “Statement of Claim and Background” are true and correct.

• Upon best information and belief “Respondent” individuals, agencies, public, private, nominated and/or elected have knowingly, overtly, covertly and with specific intent conspired together to defraud Petitioner. The individual and/or conspiratorial acts amount to a violation of the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934 (as amended in 1970), the Bank Privacy Act, the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, specifically R.I.C.O. legislation and applicable international and national money laundering restrictions. In addition it is further the mentioned Respondents’ acting individually and/or “acting in concert” violate Petitioner’s rights under the provisions of H.R. 3723 as the same pertains to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties.

Reasonable action has been taken by the Petitioner in an attempt to obtain explanation and/or under what authority Respondents are not allowing the “Rule of Law” and permitting access by Petitioner to the financial accounts referenced herein. Despite continued written notice and request for a response the named parties continue to avoid their legal obligations and continue to commit covert and/or overt acts in furtherance of their knowing and purposeful violation of the statutory references mentioned hereinabove. In furtherance of this petition for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus Petitioners direct this Court’s attention to the letters and other communications that have been marked as Exhibits A, B and C (4) attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if the same were set out in their entirety in the body of this petition.

F. CONCLUSION:

21. The “Statement of Claim and Background” demonstrate “(1) the presence of novel and significant questions of law; (2) the inadequacy of other available remedies; and (3) the presence of a legal issue whose resolution will aid in the administration of justice”.

G. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:

1. Emergency consideration of this Petition with an expedited response time for Respondents to respond to this Petition and an expedited time for the Court to hear the merits of this matter.

2. Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper to protect the Constitutionally protected rights of the Petitioner.

Executed on this 18th day of June 2007.

[Signed]
LEE E. WANTA, LEO E. WANTA, AMBASSADOR LEO WANTA _Pro_Se
5516 Falmouth Street
Suite 108
Richmond, Virginia 23230: Petitioner
Telephone: 814 455 9218
Telefax: 202 330 5116

AFFIDAVIT

The undersigned, being fully advised by counsel of the seriousness of the claim of making false statements to a Court and being fully apprised of the consequences for committing perjury (and the associated penalties), hereby make the following statements concerning the petition for Writ of Mandamus being filed on my behalf, by my counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia:

1. I am more than twenty-one years of age and I am a citizen of the United States of America.

2. For an extended period of time I am functioning as a representative, investigator, contract employee and/or facilitator of one or more assignments that were either executed and/or performed at the direction and/or under the supervision of one or more persons and/or agencies that were accountable to the Executive Offices of the United States Government

3. During most recent three to five years I have been attempting to coordinate the repatriating of substantive financial resources from foreign locations to the United States and cause the tax payments owed on the patriated funds to be paid to the United States Treasury. I have substantially completed the stated objective task with the assistance of one or more foreign sources.

4. I have read the entirety of the Petition for Writ of Mandamus prepared by my attorneys. I confirm that I have personally directed communications with the banks, security firms, the United States Department of the Treasury (including one or more individual parties associated with the Treasury that are named as Respondents) and other entities mentioned in the Petition.

5. I have personally confirmed that the financial assets sent by the People’s Republic of China were received by Bank of America in Richmond, Virginia and that upon best information and belief the subject financial assets were “tagged” in my name and transmittal instructions by the People’s Republic of China directed that the same be paid to me without offset or delay.

6. I have been personally advised by agents and/or contract regulation compliance workers, that are accountable to the United States Department of the Treasury, that release of funds sent by the People’s Republic of China for payment to me is being restricted and/or blocked by one or more parties.

7. The exact party and/or parties that are restricting and/or blocking payment of financial assets to my designated accounts is not known absolutely.

8. Upon best information and belief the United States Department of the Treasury has the power and authority to direct release of the funds for my unrestricted use.

9. Despite continued demand for release of financial assets (that were transmitted by the People’s Republic of China) for payment to me personally the demands are ignored and are not rebuked by any responsive communication.

10. I have been personally informed by parties, that have the authority to release the block on funds leveraged against recipient banking accounts established in my name, that directives have been received from known and unknown parties that have the effect of negating my ability to have free and unrestricted access to financial assets that are “tagged” solely and exclusively in my name.

IN WITNESS HEREOF I am causing the above set forth affidavit to be notarized and sworn with full recognition of the penalty of perjury this 11th day of June 2007.

[Signed]
Lee E. Wanta, Leo E. Wanta and
Ambassador Leo E. Wanta

County of [omitted here]
State of [omitted here]

On this 11th day of June 2007 the above named individual, being personally known to me, appeared before me and after being first duly sworn signed the above Affidavit.

My commission expires January 5, 2009.

[Notary signature and seal].

(2): MOTION TO DISMISS OF RESPONDENT
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA,
Alexandria Division:

LEO E. WANTA, et al, Petitioner

V.

Henry M. Paulson, Jr., et al, Respondents

[Civil Action #1:07cv609 TSE/BRP]

MOTION TO DISMISS OF RESPONDENT
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND
Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., Respondent Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (“FRB Richmond”) moves to dismiss the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Other Extraordinary Relief (the “Petition”). The grounds of this Motion, as amplified in the attached Brief, are as follow.

For the purposes of this Motion only, all well pleaded facts will be taken as true.

Mr Wanta alleges that $4.5 trillion belonging to him was transferred by the People’s Republic of China, designated “for the sole and exclusive use and benefit” of Mr Wanta, to a branch of Bank of America in Richmond. Then the United States Department of Treasury “unlawfully” caused the funds to be transferred “via” FRB Richmond to an account in the name of Goldman Sachs at Citibank in New York, where they reside to this day. Finally, Mr Wanta says that it was the Department of the Treasury that placed a “lawless restriction” on the funds, and it is the Department of the Treasury that has the power to release the funds to him.

For the following reasons, the Petition does not state a claim on which relief can be granted:

1. On the face, the Petition shows that the funds are not in the custody or under the control of FRB Richmond.
2. On its face, the Petition shows that the only party with authority to release the funds is the Department of the Treasury.
3. Even assuming, for the purposes of this Motion, that a Federal Reserve Bank is an agency of the United States:
(a) There are no facts alleged that even suggest that FRB Richmond has a clear duty to Mr Wanta to do the act requested;
(b) There are no facts alleged that even suggest that Mr Wanta has a clear and undisputable right to the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus against FRB Richmond; and:
(c) On its face, the Petition shows that Mr Wanta has other available adequate remedies.

WHEREFORE, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond prays that this action be dismissed with prejudice and that it recover its reasonable costs and Counsel fees expended.

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND
By its attorneys
Frank E, Brown, Jr.
Virginia Bar Number 1030
Attorney for Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
Saunders and Brown, PLC
8280 Greensboro Drive, Suite 601
Mclean, VA 22102
Phone: (703) 506-1022
Fax: (703) 506-1095
gbrown@saundersbrown.com.

RICHMOND FED’S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
In its accompanying Brief in Support of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond’s Motion to Dismiss, which the Richmond Federal Reserve Bank’s attorneys submitted with its Motion to Dismiss, the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond further stated as follows:

‘For the purposes of this Motion and Brief only, all well pleaded facts will be taken as true….

Mr Wanta alleges that he is still named as beneficiary of the funds transfer. Therefore, he has an adequate remedy stated under Article 4A (Funds Transfers) of the Uniform Commercial Code by demanding that Citibank release to him funds held by the bank for his benefit. If the Bank refuses, all of the issues – Mr Wanta’s right to the funds, Mr Paulson’s right to freeze them – can be heard in a Court of New York which, governed by the specific rules of the Uniform Commercial Code, would have before it all the parties with the power and authority to grant the relief requested.

Respectfully submitted:
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND
By its attorneys.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time AMENDING AND INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE. In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

Save

ROUND-UP OF RECENT REVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENTS

cropped-chrisstory

THE BELL TOLLS FOR THE CRIMINALIST CADRES AND THEY KNOW IT

Tuesday 24 November 2009 21:30

• FINANCING OF AL-QAEDA BY U.S. INTELLIGENCE: ARCHIVE: 26TH NOVEMBER 2009
Plus: Fraudulent conversion of private debt at Fed into public debt under cover of Fed audit.

THIS report, dated 24th November, has been reposted as it was overtaken by the later report…

• PREFACE: STRAIGHTFORWARD FACTS ABOUT THESE REPORTS

• THE PURGE TAKING PLACE TODAY WAS THWARTED IN 2007

• U.S. LOCOMOTIVE PLANT’S DELIVERIES TO CHINA ‘FOR FREE’

• WRECKAGE PERPETRATED BY A SMALL CLIQUE OF FINANCIAL TERRORISTS

• REVIEW OF RECENT EVENTS IN THE LIGHT OF SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

• CHINESE CONTINUE TO HOLD THE WRIT AND LIEN IN RESERVE

• FORT HOOD OPERATION TO RECOVER BOXES ‘SUCCESSFUL’

• COLLABORATION OF THE U.S. MILITARY WITH THE CHINESE

• THE DOUBLE CARTEL OIL PRICE-RIGGING MECHANISM

• PRICE-RIGGING THROUGH THE INTER CONTINENTAL EXCHANGE

• THE REAL ECONOMIC COLLAPSE IN NUMBERS

• U.S. MILITARY AT FORT HOOD ACTED IN ‘NATIONAL INTEREST’

• BOEING FLEET FLOWN TO CHINA TO COLLECT MORE BOXES

• BUSH SR. ‘ALLOWED’ TO FLY TO GERMANY: FOR A REASON

• THE WORLD WAR II GERMAN BONDS HELD AT FORT HOOD

• OBAMA AND CLINTON COULD NOT HAVE TRAVELLED TO CHINA OTHERWISE

• CONGRESSMEN APPEAR TO TAKE THEIR CUE FROM THE CHINESE DEMAND

• OTHER PROMINENT OPERATIVES SAID TO BE ‘ON THE SKIDS’

• DESPICABLE AMERICAN TREATMENT OF ITS ‘CLOSEST ALLY’

• BRITAIN SHOULD EXTRICATE ITSELF FROM U.S. ENTANGLEMENTS

• THEMES WE PIONEERED ARE BECOMING MAINSTREAM NOW

• UK MILITARY POWER SHOULD BE USED ONLY IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST

• BRITISH GOVERNMENT AT LAST STARTS MOVE TOWARDS AFGHAN EXIT

• INTERNATIONALIST AGENDA HIJACKS NATIONAL POWER

• OFFICIALLY CONDONED CRIMINAL OPS. IN AFGHANISTAN

• U.S. STATES’ FINANCIAL CRISES, AND BIDEN’S CAR CRASHES

• THE UNDERLYING REASON FOR THESE ‘ACCIDENTS’

• BLAIR NIXED AS EUROPEAN PRESIDENT BY KISSINGER’S PAL

• POINTEDLY TIMED QUERIES RAISED ABOUT BLAIR’S DEALINGS

• BLAIR’S OCCULT NOMENKLATURE FOR HIS COMPANIES

• ‘MAINSTREAM’ NOW UNDERSTANDS WHY BLAIR WANTED THE JOB

• HIGH OFFICE OFFERS PROTECTION FROM PROSECUTION

• THE TWIST BEHIND THE CHILCOT INQUIRY INTO THE IRAQ WAR

• THE EDITOR’S ENCOUNTER WITH A PENTAGON SPY

• THE SOVIET SHIPS THAT REMOVED THE IRAQI WMD

• WHY THE REMOVAL OF THE IRAQI WMD WAS SUPPRESSED

• PENTAGON AGENT TASKED TO FIND OUT WHAT WE KNEW

• BLAIR TO BE MADE THE SCAPEGOAT FOR OTHERS

• SAME CYNICAL PROCEDURE IS BEING APPLIED TO IRAN

• EUROPEAN COMMISSION OPERATING MORE ILLEGALLY THAN EVER

• BRITISH BANKS BEING TOLD WHAT TO DO BY AN IMPOSTOR

• EUROPEAN COMMISSION ACCOUNTS ARE FRAUDULENT

• THEREFORE, THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE

• DESPITE ALL THIS, A PAN-EUROPEAN GESTAPO IS BEING PLOTTED

• GERMAN-RUSSIAN RELATIONS ARE ‘INDISSOLUBLE’

• ‘IT DOESN’T MATTER THAT IT’S NOT TRUE. WHAT MATTERS IS THAT IT’S OUT THERE’.

• WARNING: Despite signs of movement towards resolution, summarised in this report, we remain braced for the likelihood of very dirty tricks at this late stage of the proceedings.

• FURTHER WARNING: We diagnose a sinister implied criminal intent to reignite the corrupt off-balance sheet, untaxed Fraudulent Finance derivatives trading using the collateral provided by the recovered Chinese 1933 and 1934 USD currency boxes as base for the ‘new’ fiat dollar money, so that a vast new eruption of funny money accruals arising from fraudulent trades achieved via new platforms that are being hastily put together by people who have no idea what they are doing, is anticipated, planned or intended. Any such development will lead straight into a global financial catastrophe within a short space of time, given that Governments, already strapped because of their rash bail-out operations in the present crisis, will be UNABLE to provide lifelines when this next generation of Fraudulent Finance ‘blows’, as it most certainly will, much faster than last time.

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice are comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor’s study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing global financial corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Just press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard. Or press the live Donate link at the top right-hand corner of this page. See also the ADVERTISEMENT below.

• See the second white panel for details of our latest distributed intelligence publications. This has its own Archive, giving details of earlier publications.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation, are appended at the foot of this report, below the legal data. See also our catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and our ‘politically incorrect’ intelligence books online from this website.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

PREFACE: STRAIGHTFORWARD FACTS ABOUT THESE REPORTS
Before we go any further several basic issues about these reports need to be revisited, given the propensity of some critics to blame the messenger.

• First, we have been operating in a dense fog of deliberate disinformation, lies and diversionary tactics perpetrated by compartmentalised agents of influence and operatives working for various competing US and foreign interests and structures with conflicting agendas and axes to grind – all concerning MONEY. By definition, therefore, separating truth from falsehood remains a continuing challenge – especially since certain well-known malevolent websites are tasked to specialise not in seeking to convey accurate insights and information, but rather in cynically and deliberately sowing diversionary confusion in accordance with instructions to maximise the potential for obfuscation of the criminality and fraud, and the cowardly failure of authorities to eradicate them.

It is self-evident that information published in these reports is derived from published sources in the public domain, from private written communications or from oral communications made to us by sources believed, through experience, to be reliable. However given that every conversation is listened to and recorded, with transcripts of some conversations still sent to the White House, and given that all who are genuinely engaged in exposing the criminality may be subject to attempted stings by the criminal cadres being exposed, one can never rule out the possibility of being misled.

At the same time, it may be too simplistic, on occasion, to categorise specified information as misleading. This is because you will recall that these people are ALL double-minded. Therefore, they may leak certain information for a dual purpose: first, to advance a particular Agency objective or discrediting agenda; and secondly, at the same time, to lay a trail which could be used to provide deniability in another, parallel context.

A case in point was the recent ‘Malik dimension’ leak to us, which actually occurred BEFORE the Fort Hood events. As indicated in outline in the report dated 12th November, following that trail leads straight to the criminal financing of Al-Qaeda and the World Class DVD-CIA criminal George Herbert Walker Bush. Equipped with this heads-up, certain operatives have rushed in to ‘confirm’ this fact – one of them being the libellant, Heneghan.

Now why would that be?

Stay tuned, as the late Sherman Skolnik used to say. It is because Marvelous Investments Limited, with which Mr Wanta and Heneghan, as well as Mrs Hillary Clinton and Eva Teleki, were involved, likewise leads to the financing of Al-Qaeda. So you see, the leaking of the ‘Malik dimension’ ahead of Fort Hood served two purposes simultaneously: it pointed fingers at George Bush Sr., while at the same time it provided, in readiness, an apparent alternative (diversionary) explanation for the Marvelous Investments Limited trail, should that operation be blown, as it will be.

Incidentally, some people have correctly pointed out that the horrific Russell Hermann sequence is an ‘old story’. That is true: but it’s not the point – which was that it highlighted a typically murderous and avaricious ‘grabitisation’ operation by George Bush Sr., and his notorious Texan ‘gopher’, one James Baker III. It is unconscionable that murderers and accessories to the fact of murder should be protected from the consequences of their crimes just because they once held high office – a consideration which, of course, applies to most of these odious operatives. Hermann was among a number of operatives involved with Iran-Contra who were horizontalised for their pains.

Despite the deliberately sustained fog of diversionary disinformation and claptrap, an experienced Editor with four decades of experience can be relied upon to possess adequate skills to be able to determine, usually with success, what is true and what may be false – especially when he has been lied to, deceived and double-crossed with the frequency suffered by this Editor, as well as being routinely threatened as has been happening with some regularity of late.

Sources usually found by us to be reliable are themselves, prone to be deceived from time to time; indeed, it is our experience that a run of accurate (and separately confirmed) information from such sources may, without warning, suddenly be followed by ‘information’ that is subsequently found to be without foundation.

This happens occasionally because the source is itself being compromised, as the disinformation apparat knows who the source talks to, and targets us through that source accordingly. Again, we have pretty good filters, but while the fog remains dense, hazards remain.

• Secondly, it should be recalled that these US criminal operatives never imagined, in their worst nightmares, that there would ever be any opposition. They thought that the funny fraudulent money bonanza would continue for ever. They had got away with murder for so long that they thought they were immune. Indeed, they imagined (and a tiny proportion of them still do) that the clock can be turned right back to before 10th-12th September 2008, i.e. to dirty business as usual. These people cannot believe that anyone has stood up to them and that their time is up.

It follows, therefore, that what we have all been observing (and recording) is an INCREMENTAL operation, a salami tactics process of attrition. Impatient armchair observers may demand instant results. That is absurd. After all, we are confronting the worst outbreak of organised, revolutionary Fraudulent Finance since Lenin and Stalin engaged in criminal financial operations against the Russian Government before 1917, when Stalin started out with his raid on the Post Office in Tbilisi, Georgia (1906), and relieving it of a large quantity of state bonds.

Does that by any chance sound familiar?

And we are observing the exposure, on a monumental scale, of precisely the same kind of base criminalist behaviour that the old Nazi Gauleiters presided over in Grossdeutschland during the Second World War – when the Rule of Law collapsed and the Gauleiters took the law into their own hands, seizing assets by force and mass-murdering their owners for self-enrichment purposes. This theme is developed in the current issue of Global Analyst [Volume 3, #3].

• Thirdly, the Bush/Greenspan criminal technique deployed all along has been to dangle the prospect of great riches in front of the noses of ordinary men and officials, against a contextual background in which an ‘everyone is doing it’ collapse of ethical standards came to prevail.

This proved to be highly ‘successful’, as the myriad Ponzi operations against Americans who forgot about the Prudent Man Rule have shown – enabling the directorate of these scams, headed by the DVD serpent and its Mossad collaborators themselves, to steal the principal invested by the Ponzi victims and then to orchestrate what must surely be the most cruel and cynical agitprop operation to keep such victims guessing, ever perpetrated by agents of a corrupt government against its own population. This cynical, deceitful agitprop operation continues to this day.

• Finally, as noted above, the criminalists never imagined that they would be confronted, let alone cornered. It is therefore a fact that they have NEVER recovered from being faced down. Contrary to appearances at times, they have remained perpetually on the defensive – so that every time they clambered up off the floor, they have been slapped down harder than previously.

As a consequence they have been dazed, walking around in confusion, unsure what nailed boot will descend on them next, unable to sleep soundly at night, fearful of the Day of Reckoning – and yet determined, given their criminal mentality, to continue their resistance to the inevitable: which is that they ARE being taken down, and they WILL (as we predicted a long while ago) be made to pay for what they have done. It just takes time and superhuman patience.

In the meantime, an orchestrated campaign of ‘Black’ propaganda against The Queen is being perpetrated by US cadres whose serial criminality and thievery has been exposed, and who find themselves having to face a reality they never thought could arise. This orchestrated campaign encapsulates the lie that the $6.2 trillion of sovereign LOAN money was a ‘replacement for’ the stolen $4.5 trillion referenced in earlier reports – whereas it had nothing to do with those stolen funds at all. As we alone reported, the $6.2 trillion was indeed placed into ‘lockdown’ on 10th-12th September 2008 and made inaccessible for illicit trading operations, as it had not been used for the purpose for which it was intended: namely the on-the-books Dollar Refunding Programme, which generates on-balance sheet, taxable accruals: whereas the financial terrorists who have been in charge are incurring $1.0 trillion of unnecessary Treasury debt per annum or more because they couldn’t bear the thought of the discontinuity affecting their Fraudulent Finance operations being made permanent, so that the huge speculative institutions will have to find something else to do.

The campaign to denigrate The Queen represents a desperate, and failing, ‘Black’ operation to try to confuse the issue by perpetuating the lie that the $6.2 trillion ‘replaced’ the $4.5 trillion, which was never the case. It is noted that this lie is being ‘shouted’ at us: in big black capital letters – on Goebbels’ principle that if a lie is repeated often and loud enough, it becomes fact.

• This childish behaviour has simply revealed how desperate and beside themselves these losers are, now that their duplicity and criminality has been faced down. They don’t know what to do, so they are shouting like naughty boys in a nursery where all discipline collapsed long ago.

THE PURGE TAKING PLACE TODAY WAS THWARTED IN 2007
Late on 21st November, after the Editor had reported the threat to burn our building down, we were told on the transatlantic line that every one of these perpetrators needs to be arrested, clothed in bright orange like Stanford, chained together, frog-marched in front of the world’s TV cameras (Links, Rechts, Links, Rechts, Links, Rechts, Links, Rechts) and publicly humiliated before being herded under US military conditions to one of the multiple bleak Gulag concentration camp areas prepared for the US revolution, where the gates should be slammed in their faces while they are locked up in standing room-only cubicles where they can spend the rest of their diminishing days contemplating the life cycle of the North American cockroach and any other primitive form of life that may inhabit the latrines of the facilities in question.

This of course, should have happened two years ago. But the purge that started then, was aborted, as the Bush wing of the ‘Box Gang’ was still in power: as a consequence of which, the whole world was pushed to the brink of collapse, just as the US dollar faces collapse if this stupid resistance is allowed to continue much longer.

We are very confident (at the time of posting) that it won’t, because of the recent pattern of events which will now be explained to the best of our current knowledge, and because of the long delayed remedy which awaits implementation.

U.S. LOCOMOTIVE PLANT’S DELIVERIES TO CHINA ‘FOR FREE’
First, though, recall that following the libels perpetrated against the Editor of this service by the criminal disinformation operative Heneghan that had to be featured at the top of the preceding report, we added some outline details about an order received by a GE Transportation plant in Pennsylvania for 300 locomotive kits. China now owns 47% of the United States’ total debt.

This Lawrence Park Township and Grove City locomotive manufacturing plant owned by General Electric Company is engaged in completing 1,480 layoffs, announced at the end of September, by the end of this month. The order from China, confirmed on Monday 16th November (i.e. during Obama’s trip to China) for 300 locomotive ‘kits’ (consisting of high-value components such as the control systems) following an order placed by China in 2005 for a similar number of ‘kits’, reflects inter alia the Chinese demand for concrete deliveries, for redemption against a proportion of the (now worthless) derivatives junk in which GE specialised (as reported when we were analysing the methodology underlying the Fraudulent Finance crisis).

In other words, the Chinese, owners of 47% of the US (corporate) debt, have asked the Americans, in this instance, to manufacture and supply the ‘brains’ for a batch of 300 Evolution Series China Mainland locomotives – effectively for ‘nothing’.

Instead of GE’s junk derivatives paper being redeemed in ‘real’ dollars, in which China is drowning, the shrewd Chinese, who being America’s biggest creditor, hold the whip hand (as well as the Writ of Execution and the lien: see below), have demanded practical railway hardware.

How will the US GE plants be financed while this manufacturing order is being fulfilled? Answer: Finally, via ‘stimulus money’ (which hasn’t been distributed yet, as the official criminals were using it for their ‘platform operations’). ‘At the present time, we are still holding out a lot of hope from the stimulus’, Jim Fifer, President of Local 506 of the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, told the local press on 17th November 2009 (1).

WRECKAGE PERPETRATED BY A SMALL CLIQUE OF FINANCIAL TERRORISTS
The foregoing shows the extreme consequences of the bovine resistance of a few arrogant US operatives elevated far above their capabilities who appeared, at this writing, STILL not to have understood that their resistance to the inevitable is now futile.

Because we have it on impeccable authority that the decision has now been taken to expose the criminality, and for the resistance to be crushed. As we aren’t in the driving seat, obviously we can’t prescribe how this should be done (our preference would be as described above). But we expect the exposures to be absolutely devastating, and that they will hit these people between the eyes when they weren’t expecting it – as usual. They never expected ANY opposition.

REVIEW OF RECENT EVENTS IN THE LIGHT OF SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
So let us now review what has happened – just over two years after Citibank was comprehensively exposed by this service as a criminal enterprise [see Archive].

And the first place to start is to recall that, as stated at the top of the report dated 12th November, with effect from one minute past midnight on Monday morning 9th November (9/11), the US military were placed on high alert.

The reason for this alert became apparent on Veterans’ (Armistice) Day, 11th November 2009, when violence erupted at the huge Fort Hood military territory in Texas, just 30 miles or so from George Bush Jr.’s ranch at Crawford. As our subscriber and correspondent, the Texas attorney who works with Fort Hood, testified in his correspondence to the Editor, events on that occasion did not ‘add up’ at all. His testimony will be found in the report dated 12th November [see Archive].

That was the date by which the Chinese parties were to have exercised their lien on the American Treasury, the Federal Reserve and the White House, in accordance with their World Court authority to do so. The holder of a Writ of Execution can effectively ‘wave the Writ’ in front of the delinquent creditor by way of a threat, forcing the issue without in fact proceeding with the Writ of Execution or lien, although it retains the power to do so. This obvious consideration raises the question: was the Writ sequence a sort of decoy, while other ‘remedies’ were being finalised?

CHINESE CONTINUE TO HOLD THE WRIT AND LIEN IN RESERVE
The answer to that question is both Yes and No. The Chinese parties continue to hold the Writ of Execution and the lien and remain conspicuously in charge of proceedings, to the humiliation of the criminalist idiots who have been cornered due to their own self-interested greed and the lust of the corrupt elements within the US Intelligence Power for independent sources of funny money to fund its Black Operations and other disruptive initiatives around the world ostensibly on behalf of the Executive Power and the energy corporations, but in reality on behalf of itself.

Having long since usurped total power in the United States (recall our metaphor of the three flanks of the Power Pyramid), the Intelligence Power refuses to relinquish its control; so an international showdown (predicted by this service) became inevitable. The first international violence phase of this showdown occurred at Fort Hood on 11th November 2009.

FORT HOOD OPERATION TO RECOVER BOXES ‘SUCCESSFUL’
As we were able to report in the preceding presentation, a Chinese secret police representative has confirmed that the Fort Hood operation was ‘successful’ from their perspective – a fact that has subsequently been reconfirmed to us by other reliable sources. This means that, as we know, the Chinese successfully retrieved the currency boxes that had been held under guard at Fort Hood for the past 15 years.

COLLABORATION OF THE U.S. MILITARY WITH THE CHINESE
Self-evidently, the Chinese cadres could not have achieved ‘success’ without the cooperation of the US military at Fort Hood – indicating a ‘sudden’ community of interests between the Pentagon and the Chinese parties (as well as with the British Monarchical Power) in the grim context of the decisive thrust of the Writ of Execution and the Chinese lien over the US Treasury, the US Federal Reserve, the White House and a vast swathe, by extension, of the financial and real economies – arising entirely as a consequence of the serial and endless criminality of successive arrogant US Administrations, the obtuse insistence of the Intelligence Power in seeking to retain its previously unchallenged ability to generate vast funny money resources enabling it to retain its hegemony over the Government: and giving it the illicit resources with which to intermeddle catastrophically all over the world, where its successive botched operations on behalf of the White House and the energy corporations have wreaked havoc everywhere, so far with impunity.

THE DOUBLE CARTEL OIL PRICE-RIGGING MECHANISM
The US Intelligence Power’s hegemony all these years has been attributable to a combination of penetration of the CIA by DVD (Nazi Abwehr) cadres and to the scamming requirements of the US energy corporations, which operate a price cartel behind the cover provided by the ‘front’ cartel, The Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), which was created at the Baghdad Conference held on 10th-14th September 1960, by Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela.

The five founding members of OPEC were later joined by nine other participants: Qatar, 1961; Indonesia, 1962 [suspended January 2009]; Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 1962; the United Arab Emirates, 1967; Algeria, 1969; Nigeria, 1971; Ecuador, 1973 [suspended December 1992 to October 2007]; Angola, 2007; and Gabon, 1975, 1994. Russia has for a number of years operated within OPEC with ‘observer status’.

The OPEC cartel provides cover, as indicated, for the oil corporations, which cannot rig prices domestically in the United States due to strong anti-monopoly laws. So, as is the case with almost every abuse perpetrated by the US Intelligence Power and its masters, they sought to establish a means of rigging prices externally. This operation was completed by US Treasury Secretary William Simon’s achievement, brokered by the triple agent and DVD chief Dr Henry (Heinz) Kissinger in June 1974, when the denomination of all oil invoices in US dollars was ‘confirmed’ – while special arrangements were reached with the US Treasury for ‘add-on’ US Treasury securities to be made available off-market for absorption by the monetary authorities of the oil-producing states, such as the Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency (SAMA).

In the 1970s, our financial journal International Currency Review exposed this accord as the secret Saudi-American Agreement: and it is this precedent which underlies the subsequent catastrophic institutionalisation of the one-way debt escalation system which is about to be put into reverse with the imminent new US Dollar Refunding Programme arrangements.

PRICE-RIGGING THROUGH THE INTER CONTINENTAL EXCHANGE
To buttress the somewhat ‘unreliable’ oil price-rigging mechanism operated by the oil corporations behind the cover provided by OPEC, a new price falsification mechanism was established in 2000 by Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, British Petroleum, Total, Shell Oil, Deutsche Bank and Société Générale, called the Inter Continental Exchange (ICE). This is an online commodities and futures virtual marketplace which exists outside the United States and operates, like the two oil cartels themselves, beyond the constraints of the US anti-monopoly and anti-cartel legislation.

Following a Congressional investigation in 2003, the ICE was found to be facilitating ‘round-trip’ trades – in which one firm sells energy to another, whereupon the second entity sells the same amount of energy back to the first corporation, at the same time and at exactly the same price. Although no commodity ever changes hands, the transactions send signals to the market, falsify the price structure, and artificially augment corporate revenues: CARTELISED SPECULATION.

• Under overt Communism and in places like revolutionary Iraq and Iran, speculators used to be hanged from lamp posts or specially erected gibbets, as used to happen in mediaeval England.

When Congress investigated a firm called DMS Energy, the corporation admitted that 80% of its trades in 2001 were ‘round-trip’ trades, which meant that 80% of its trades in that year were false trades. No oil changed hands, but balance sheets showed ballooning revenues. The expert analyst Philip Davis, who has exposed this recently, says that the purpose of these trades (apart from padding balance sheets) is to inflate commodity prices.

According to Davis. After the ICE had turned commodity trading into “a speculative casino game where pricing was notional and contracts could be sold by people who never produced a thing, to people who didn’t need the things that were not produced”, Goldman Sachs were able to triple the price of commodities in the space of five years. At the present stage of the massively contracted world economy, oil prices have RISEN – despite a very sharp fall in consumption. In other words, a parallel virtual scamming operation has developed in the commodity markets, operating in parallel with the Fraudulent Finance scams that we have been reporting on for years.

THE REAL ECONOMIC COLLAPSE IN NUMBERS
It makes no sense, of course, for oil prices to rise when demand implodes – as has been the case worldwide. This is obvious from a glance at export and import data. Over the year to the second quarter of 2009, exports by VOLUME contracted in the following listed countries by the proportions shown after the name of each country:

Austria, – 17.2%; Belgium, – 18.7%; Canada, – 18.4%; Czech Republic, – 16.6%; Denmark, – 13.5%; Finland, – 30.2%; France, – 12.9%; Germany, – 18.6%; Greece, – 10.9%; Hungary, – 14.1%; Italy, – 23.9%; Japan, – 29.2%; Mexico, – 24.3%; Netherlands, – 12.2%; Norway, – 8.9%; Poland, – 13.4%; Portugal, – 17.1%; Spain, – 15.7%; Sweden – 15.2%; Switzerland, – 15.8%; United Kingdom, – 13.0%; United States, – 15.0%.

Obviously, a similar picture was reflected in collapsing imports of goods and services by volume. Against the background of such coruscating data alone, there is no way that oil prices could have risen without a price falsification operation. The same happened, notoriously, in 2008.

U.S. MILITARY AT FORT HOOD ACTED IN ‘NATIONAL INTEREST’
The US military elements that collaborated with the Chinese secret police et al. at Fort Hood did so plainly ‘in the national interest’, given that the Chinese authorities held, and continue to hold, the whip hand given their possession of the Writ of Execution and their prospective lien on the US Treasury. For their part, the Chinese were also working in the US national interest, as well as in their own and the international interest, in bring this crisis to a head, inter alia at Fort Hood.

BOEING FLEET FLOWN TO CHINA TO COLLECT MORE BOXES
Meanwhile, when Barack Hussein Obama appeared in Alaska on veterans’ Day, Air Force One was joined by three or more cargo Boeing aircraft, which we are told took off from Fairbanks en route to China ‘with’ the President’s aircraft. These cargo planes reportedly (as has since been confirmed by several sources to us) collected further heavy boxes containing currency, gold coins and other assets in China which, together with the 1933 and 1934 US currency boxes that were retrieved from Fort Hood, where the Bush Sr.-led ‘Box Gang’ had managed to keep them under guard since they were originally stolen 15 years earlier – in 1994 – were to be merged to provide the backing for the US dollar under the new, reformed settlement that is in the process of being implemented.

These facts alone confirm that the ‘Box Gang’ may have been defeated – a development enhanced by reports (which, again, have since been separately confirmed to us) that Mrs Hillary Clinton, the US Secretary of State pro tem., ‘rolled over’ on the Bushes and possibly on others (including her CIA husband?), as a consequence of which she appears temporarily to be ‘off the hook’ (but she probably shouldn’t count on that remaining the case for long).

BUSH SR. ‘ALLOWED’ TO FLY TO GERMANY: FOR A REASON
As previously reported, George Bush Sr., was ‘allowed’ to travel to Germany (having been given back his passport for the purpose), where he hob-nobbed with his partners-in-crime, the former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachëv, former Chancellor Helmut Kohl (in a wheelchair), and Joseph Ackermann, CEO of Deutschebank, all of whom are ‘partners’ in Barrington Group Investments, AG, now known as Deutsche AG, of St Gallen, Switzerland (Marc Rich, aka Hans Brand territory).

The occasion of the 20th anniversary of the ‘fall’ of the Berlin Wall was the pretext that provided cover for this trip, which was ‘allowed’ so that distributions and bribes that Bush Sr. was evidently known to be intending to order, with the assistance of Ackermann and other German (DVD) banking associates at institutions such as Dresdner Bank, could be intensively traced, and the Bush assets thereby traced to accounts in the Caribbean could be seized (as reported).

Some of these bank accounts were identified earlier in facsimiles of transactions for George Bush Sr. published in International Currency Review. There are new, unconfirmed reports of US Boeing flights from Colombia to Switzerland, which are believed to be connected with the removal of Bush-linked drug-trafficking proceeds and ‘assets’ from that corrupted country to Swiss ‘safekeeping’, a further development which obviously begs many highly disturbing questions, if these reports are confirmed. For the time being, this unconfirmed development would appear to be another phase of the same operation, which presupposes the wholesale dismantling of Bush Sr.’s power and control, although even that deduction remains uncertain at this juncture. It’s possible that this ‘dismantling’ may be in process, with his ‘agreement’: in other words, that a sordid deal has been struck.

It was established almost immediately after the violence at Fort Hood that Mr George Bush Sr. was present on-site. We also published a report originating with the Los Angeles Times that George W. Bush made a hurried ‘secret’ visit to Fort Hood from his Crawford ranch on the day of the violence, and that Bush Jr. and his wife Laura paid a further visit to Fort Hood on the following day.

We asked the rhetorical question: has George Bush Sr. been horizontalised – given that several informants indicated that this was the intention. We also pointed out that experience had shown that whenever such a possibility has been mooted, it tends to be standard deception practice for the individual concerned to surface a few days later – usually in a ‘humanitarian’ context. This is exactly what happened, when Bush Sr. ostensibly appeared, complete with his walking stick, at a ‘charity event’ in Indianapolis. We have been advised on good authority, nonetheless, that the question of whether Senior has been horizontalised or not, remains ‘up in the air’.

• The CIA operates an arrangement with Hollywood specialists which is believed to function like an employment agency, with look-alikes kept on the books ready to be rented out for ‘double’ work at high fees. These arrangements are supplemented by the make-up skills of a handful of Hollywood make-up specialists. However we ourselves do not waste time in speculation concerning ‘doubles’ unless the deception appears obvious, as on that hilarious occasion when a Cheney appeared on a platform wearing a ten-gallon hat so that his features could not be seen clearly.

THE WORLD WAR II GERMAN BONDS HELD AT FORT HOOD
Bush Sr.’s involvement all along, beyond his financial criminality generally, has been associated in part with the known existence at Fort Hood of closely guarded German World War II ‘reparations’ bonds, which we understand that the United States ‘will never seek to redeem’.

This was certainly the ‘line’ a few years ago. It is interesting to speculate whether, given the now drastically altered situation, some arrangement might have been implemented behind the scenes whereby the colossal overhang of derivatives held for instance by Deutsche Bank, Bush Sr.’s main ‘trading partner bank’, may have been redeemed against repatriation of some or all of these bonds. If so, that would of course mean that the US Treasury is stuffed beyond the gills with ‘its own’ worthless derivatives trash – making the urgent provision of new backing for the US dollar indispensable in order for a collapse to be avoided.

The Chinese were able to pull off Fort Hood with the cooperation of elements of the US military because in so doing the exercise of their lien on the US Treasury, the Federal Reserve, etc, was sidestepped – while at the same time, the Chinese continue to hold this lien in reserve, to ensure completion of the operations to the satisfaction of all parties – with the exception of the diehards at the US Treasury, the Federal Reserve, Citibank, the CIA and elsewhere who appear not to have realised, as late as last week, that the game is up. In other words, the completely demented Obama-Geithner-Bernanke attempt to continue the off-balance sheet, untaxed, illicit Fraudulent Finance carousel, long after the discontinuity of 10th-12th September 2009, has run into the sand.

OBAMA AND CLINTON COULD NOT HAVE TRAVELLED TO CHINA OTHERWISE
Manifestly, too, Mr Obama and Mrs Clinton could not possibly have travelled to China if these arrangements were not in hand, pre-arranged, and guaranteed to be ‘successful’, as the Chinese secret policeman revealed. That consideration alone makes it clear that this ‘resolution sequence’ was a carefully planned operation from the get-go – which has in fact transformed the situation – not least given that the ‘Box Gang’ impediments appear to have been removed. We were informed over the weekend of 21st-22nd November that all impediments to the payments due to the CMKX victims also appeared to have been removed (but CMKX victims and parties must investigate this matter for themselves and not rely on this statement, even though we believe it to be correct).

Yet notwithstanding all this, following Barack Obama’s return from China, when he was able, we believe, to give the ‘all-clear’, further resistance to the settlements was encountered from the US Treasury Secretary, Mr Geithner, who was loudly urged by Congressmen to resign from his post. This was significant, as sources had informed us that the Chinese had lectured Mr Obama on the need for ‘heads to roll’: the way it was put to us by several sources was that ‘the Chinese want prominent figures to pay for this’.

CONGRESSMEN APPEAR TO TAKE THEIR CUE FROM THE CHINESE DEMAND
As if like clockwork, The Wall Street Journal reported on 19th November that the TEXAS Republican Kevin Brady, a pillar of the ‘conservative right-wing’, cross-examining the US Treasury Secretary Mr Timothy Geithner at a Joint Economic Committee hearing in Congress, had informed the Treasury Secretary that Republicans, Democrats and indeed the American people had lost confidence in Mr Geithner: would he please now resign? Mr Geithner retorted: ‘It is a great privilege to serve this President. I agree with almost nothing you said’. He then tried to blame the Republicans for the mess that he himself has immensely exacerbated: ‘You gave this President an economy falling off the cliff’. Quite so Mr Geithner: but YOU have made it far worse by attempting to rescue the deficit-financing model so that the illicit Fraudulent Finance carousel can continue.

The exchange got nastier:

Brady: ‘Remind me, Mr Secretary, what post were you holding when President Obama took office?’

Geithner: ‘I was the President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’. [Unstated: ‘… where I presided over the accumulation of a colossal overhang of now worthless derivatives ‘assets’ that are nominally ‘worth’ over $500 trillion [probably much more: Ed.] which I’m trying to ‘save”].

Mr Brady then accused Geithner of ‘shirking responsibility for the design of this bailout’.

Later the same day, Oregon Democrat Peter DeFazio, a ‘progressive’, accused Geithner of paying more attention to Wall Street than to Main Street, during an MSNBC interview with Ed Schultz. He ended by calling for both Larry Summers and Geithner to be fired. The point of mentioning all this is that these interventions ‘just happen’ to have followed a known Chinese demand, during Obama’s visit, for senior scalps to be seen to be removed from the heads of their wearers.

OTHER PROMINENT OPERATIVES SAID TO BE ‘ON THE SKIDS’
In addition to the likelihood that Geithner will have to go, we are also being told that Mr Rahm Emanuel, the Mossad Irgun Chief of Staff at the White House, and others, may be removed, as may Leon Panetta, the CIA’s Director of Central Intelligence, who ‘works with’ Rahm Emanuel.

These criminal finance terrorists have all passed their sell-by date, having tried to perpetuate the debilitating Fraudulent Finance and debt-financing carousel against the interests of the American people, the US Republic, the defrauded Chinese, the scammed British Monarchical Power, other sovereign scamees, and the international community, which has faced the prospect of the outright collapse of the US dollar system. Whether the secret Fascist intention all along was to collapse the international financial system in order to enable the criminalist clique to buy up the entire world’s resources and assets at firesale prices, will probably never be known.

DESPICABLE AMERICAN TREATMENT OF ITS ‘CLOSEST ALLY’
Certainly the behaviour of the US military during this crisis has been fully consistent with the Nazi Fascist mentality, as was leaked via The Daily Telegraph on 23rd November 2009 (3), in a front page report revealing the antagonism, contempt and tensions prevailing between the British military and the Americans in the Iraqi theatre. Immediately ahead of the Chalcot Inquiry which started on 24th November (in London) into the Iraqi conflict, classified documents were leaked to the newspaper, in which the British Chief of Staff in Iraq, J K Tanner, had described his American military counterparts as ‘a group of Martians’ for whom ‘dialogue is alien’.

The British Chief of Staff in Iraq thereby confirmed our long-held assessment that the hyped, so-called ‘special relationship’ between Britain and the United States is treated with utter contempt by the conspicuously failing so-called ‘sole superpower’, by adding: ‘Despite our so-called ‘special relationship’, I reckon we were treated no differently to the Portuguese’.

The unspeakable Nazi mentality (see Heneghan) is never, ever wrong, and is ready at all times to justify or cover up iniquity by spewing out further lies, creating what we have described in the past as an ‘inverted pyramid’ of lies which grows so tall that it has to be propped up on either flank by scaffolding that eventually collapses along with the inverted pyramid itself (which is exactly what is happening in real-time ‘as we speak’). Another feature of the Nazi mentality is that it cannot abide being shown to be in error: since the Nazi mentality is permanently right, infallible like the Pope, it can never make mistakes: so to point out the error of its ways is a monstrous usurpation, a slur on its integrity and an abomination worthy only of permanent excoriation.

Colonel Tanner’s superior, Major General Andrew Stewart, the senior British Commanding Officer in Iraq, described in the documents how he had to spend ‘a significant amount of my time’ ‘evading’ and ‘refusing’ arrogant orders from his US superiors.

On one occasion, after he had refused to obey an order, the British Ambassador in Washington, Sir David Manning, was summoned like a naughty schoolboy to the American State Department for a diplomatic reprimand of the kind usually delivered to ‘rogue states’ such as Zimbabwe or Sudan. Since, of course, the United States has reduced itself, given its illegal and barbaric behaviour, to the status of a ‘rogue state’, the irony of such behaviour requires no elaboration.

Such frank statements were made during official debriefing interviews conducted by the British Ministry of Defence with Army commanders who had just returned from Operations Telic 2 and 3, conducted between May 2003 and May 2004. With the sensitive Chilcot Inquiry starting on 24th November, a set of classified transcripts of the interviews, along with ‘post-operational reports’ by British commanders, mysteriously arrived in the hands of the British newspaper, which has made a name for itself by specialising recently in investigative exposures.

General Stewart thought that ‘our ability to influence US policy in Iraq seemed to be minimal’. Incredibly, there was not even a secure communications link between his Basra HQ and the US Commander, General Rick Sanchez, in Baghdad. Colonel Tanner said that ‘Sanchez only visited us once in seven months’ adding that he himself only spoke with his own US counterpart at the US Corps HQ in the Green Zone once over the same period. British commanders said, too, that they were not even told, let alone consulted on, major switches in US policy (which were happening all the time) that had significant implications for the British military and their troops.

Thus, when the Americans decided to arrest a key lieutenant of the Shi’a leader Muqtada al-Sadr, which triggered an uprising throughout the British sector, ‘it was not co-ordinated with us and no one was told that it was going to happen’, according to Brigadier Nick Carter, senior British field commander at the time. ‘Had we known, we would at least have been able to prepare the ground’. Instead, ‘the consequence was that my whole area of operations went up in smoke, as a result of coalition operations that were out of my control or knowledge’.

Colonel Tanner elaborated: ‘The whole system was appalling. We experienced real difficulty in dealing with American military and civilian organizations who, partly through arrogance and partly through bureaucracy, dictate that there is only one way: the American way’.

• For ‘American’ here, read: NAZI.

‘We managed to get on better with our European partners and at times with the Arabs than with the Americans. Europeans chat to each other, whereas dialogue is alien to the US military. Dealing with them corporately is akin to dealing with a group of Martians. If it isn’t on the PowerPoint slide, then it doesn’t happen’.

BRITAIN SHOULD EXTRICATE ITSELF FROM U.S. ENTANGLEMENTS
Of course this leaked anecdotal information further confirms our assessment that while the Americans wallow in the consequences of their serial criminality, their so-called ‘closest ally’, Britain, should extricate itself from their influence as far as this is practically possible.

When this was suggested to an associate (whom the Editor has had to reprimand for her non-stop subversive criticism of Barack Obama who, whether we like it or not, occupies the position that he occupies – just as the criminal Bushes and Clinton did before him), she retorted:

‘That’s just what Obama wants’.

To which the straightforward answer is as follows: we cannot be dragged down indefinitely by a criminal, rogue régime which thinks it can behave like Hitler and allows its Intelligence Power and Military Power to rampage around the world wreaking havoc everywhere.

The United States is paying and will continue to pay for its failure to curb and bring under control the criminalised elements within the Intelligence Power, and for its arrogance in assuming that it can do as it likes in a world that does not consist exclusively of Americans.

The American people, in this veteran Americanist’s experience, are the most generous and loyal friends on earth. But their government and its criminal structures ‘suck’, and they have behaved abominably on the world stage for decades. The arrogance of their official structures is beyond intolerable; and as we can see, even elements within those structures now recognise that things have gone too far. This is the beginning of a long and bumpy road towards US recovery: but as for the ‘moral high ground’, that has been forfeited for ever.

THEMES WE PIONEERED ARE BECOMING MAINSTREAM NOW
It is evident that many of the themes that we have espoused in these reports are now becoming accepted long after we first espoused them. For instance, as indicated above, not only is the so-called ‘special relationship’ now, at last, questioned by the British military, but so is the intolerable position that our military forces have been catapulted into generally.

We refer to the sterile ‘internationalisation’ of military power – invariably in pursuit of a SECRET internationalist agenda which has little to do with the British national interest (although Britain has no national interests, as they have all been ‘collectivised’, in theory, within the fake parallel (and illegal: see below) governance system that we refer to as the European Union Collective).

The New Underworld Order prescribes that national military power is collectivised in order to advance the interests of the promoters of the ‘One World’ agenda, which is of course leading the whole world into chaos. British forces, paid for by the taxpayer, exist exclusively to provide the British people and the nation’s assets with military power and defence. They do NOT exist in order to pursue an internationalist agenda, which has been the case since NATO was hijacked for this purpose amid much pomp and circumstance in the 1990s.

UK MILITARY POWER SHOULD BE USED ONLY IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST
Britain should make it clear both to the Americans and to NATO that it’s military power will be deployed in future exclusively in British national interests, and that the British people will be informed of the national interests that justify that deployment.

This is one of the issues underlying the Chilcot Inquiry into Britain’s participation in the Iraq War, which has the potential to add to the rolling exposures of the criminality already taking place.

Of course, since the UK civil servants and other ‘experts’ who will be participating in this Public Inquiry are likely all to be fully paid-up members of the discredited internationalist clIque, this theme will probably remain a sub-text of the investigations.

Even so, the ludicrous anomalies and lengths to which the Blair Government went to disguise the purposes of the Iraq invasion to the British people, will be laid bare for all observers who are not sitting on their brains, to see for themselves. What needs to follow this Inquiry is a comprehensive reappraisal of Britain’s military role. In this connection, all emotional issues must be set aside. The sole criterion must be that stated above: Britain’s military will NOT cooperate in ANY venture which does not DIRECTLY serve British national interests, whatever the consequences.

BRITISH GOVERNMENT AT LAST STARTS MOVE TOWARDS AFGHAN EXIT
This of course brings us to Afghanistan. Although our letter to the Ministry of Defence requesting an explanation for British military participation in Afghanistan was contemptuously ignored, and our warning that if the letter was ignored we would be compelled to assume that our assumption that we are in Afghanistan to control and exploit the heroin trade (whatever other new pretexts may be wheeled out at any time) is correct, there has since been conspicuous ‘movement’ on this score.

Specifically:

• On 14th November, Gordon Brown, the British Prime Minister, pronounced that British troops could not stay in Afghanistan for ever. Speaking in a BBC Radio 4 interview, Mr Brown said: ‘You cannot be an occupying army for ever. Our strategy will be Afghan control over their own affairs. That will take some time but then British troops will start coming home’ (4).

• Peter Hain, the Welsh Secretary, in an interview with The Times, London, on the same day, called for ‘greater clarity’ over Afghanistan. ‘We need to get a grip on it’ (5). Thank you, Mr Hain. We asked the Ministry of Defence for ‘clarity’ in the summer of 2008 and got no answer.

The public would not, Peter Hain added, tolerate a long campaign. Of course, what these cynical UK Ministers have been worried about is the constant parade of funerals in pretty Wiltshire villages and coffins for burial, which make the front pages almost every time nowadays – sending a signal to the Government that enough is enough. All that Ministers care about, of course, is perceptions: and what the public perceives is that a large number of young British soldiers are dying for a cause that has never been explained to them. Of course it hasn’t.

INTERNATIONALIST AGENDA HIJACKS NATIONAL POWER
Because Afghanistan is another example of the internationalist agenda hijacking Britain’s military power for its own purposes. But in fact it’s worse than that. What has in fact occurred is that the internationalist power-projection agenda over which NATO waxed so proud in 1990 has itself been hijacked – in pursuit of secret US oil and drug-running agendas masquerading as international peacekeeping. Several of our publications distributed from London on 20th November 2009 carry that photograph of a US soldier guarding a poppy field. In the somewhat obscure background to that prhotograph, we discovered, under a printer’s eye-glass, that the heroin poppy field shown was surrounded by a tall breezeblock wall. This made it clear that the poppy crop, or some of it, is being grown in closely guarded, walled fields. Why is this happening?

OFFICIALLY CONDONED CRIMINAL OPS. IN AFGHANISTAN
Because the Dark Forces ‘need’ the drug-trafficking proceeds to ensure the continued liquidity of the interbank market – as confirmed by the head of the Vienna-based United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNDOC), Antonio Maria Costa, in his interview with the Austrian journal Profil in January 2009 that we have ‘profiled’ numerous times this year.

Do the likes of Gordon Brown and Peter Hain know this? If they don’t, they are incompetent and in dereliction of their duty of competence in serving the British people.

If they do, they are co-conspirators and accessories to the fact of GENOCIDE, as profiting through drug-trafficking is GENOCIDE. Because the British Ministry of Defence refused to respond to the Editor’s letter, it is clear that the British Government is engaged, and not only in Afghanistan [see below], in criminal operations, which is a state of affairs that cannot be tolerated.

• A former Foreign Office Minister, Kim Howells, has stated that British troops should be withdrawn (6). Given that British troops are dying in order to assist the criminalised American Military and Intelligence Powers with their drug-trafficking agenda, we agree. It should happen NOW.

• Nick Clegg, leader of the Liberal Party, has added his voice to suggestions that the British Government’s Afghanistan policy is unsustainable (7).

Of course it is. Note, however, that NO REASONS have been given by the personalities on the public stage who have started to acknowledge that our questioning of the Afghanistan policy is justified. This is because of the dangers they all face in having themselves aided and abetted a criminal operation to enable the US Military and Intelligence Powers to take over, control and exploit the Afghan heroin poppy trade.

These dangers are increasing daily for them, as this entire gigantic edifice of corruption crumbles, and especially when they start to see top people being dragged before the Chilcot Inquiry into the background to the Iraq War. Quite rightly, they anticipate that a precedent has been set for a similar public investigation into Britain’s participation in the war in Afghanistan,

U.S. STATES’ FINANCIAL CRISES, AND BIDEN’S CAR CRASHES
Before we turn to developments in the ‘European theatre’, we can usefully place two publicised developments in the United States on this record:

(1): The financial crises in Pennsylvania and California attributable in part to the hijacking of the stimulus money for illicit ‘platform trading’ operations by the crooks at the US Treasury, have been replicated in the following States, according to the Pew Center: Arizona, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon, Rhode Island and Wisconsin. In California, State agencies issued IOUs earlier this year to try to pay their bills. A number of institutions refused to redeem the bills.

(2): Vice President Joseph Biden’s transportation cadres have been engaged in a series of ‘accidents’ in recent weeks. Specifically:

• At about 2:30 am on Wednesday 11th November 2009 two US Secret Service armoured vehicles used to protect Vice President Joseph Biden struck and killed a pedestrian in Temple Hills, at the intersection of Suitland Parkway and Naylor Road, according to US Park Police (that’s right, the outfit that ‘botched’ the investigation into the ‘suiciding’ of Vincent Foster, you will recall).

The unnamed adult male pedestrian was then transported to Prince George’s Hospital Center in Cheverly with multiple critical injuries, and was pronounced dead shortly thereafter. The vehicles are part of a fleet used to protect the Vice President, and were used to convey Mr Biden during a visit to Fort Lewis, Washington State. The vehicles had been airlifted by military planes back to Andrews Air Force Base, and were heading back to a garage at the time of the incident.

The Veep had travelled to the state to attend a memorial service for seven US soldiers who were killed in Afghanistan on 27th October in a vehicle (8). The troops died, of course, in the line of duty (assisting the criminalised Military and Intelligence Powers to annexe, control and exploit the huge heroin crop, so that more of the troops’ fellow Americans will die, too).

Biden was reported to have returned to his residence at the US Naval Observatory much earlier and was not involved in the incident. The identity of the victim was withheld.

• On Monday 16th November, according to the Albuquerque Journal, a Bernalillo County Sheriff’s Deputy escorting Vice President Biden’s motorcade hit a pedestrian (9). Mr Biden was said to have been in Albuquerque for a $1,000-a-plate luncheon for first-term Democratic Party Representatives at the city’s Hotel Andaluz. The reports on this incident were confused, but centred on allegations that a woman drove around police vehicles blocking an intersection and collided with the Deputy’s car. Albuquerque has been the scene of similar incidents before.

In August 2007, a Rio Rancho motorcycle officer who was part of President Bush’s motorcade died in a collision, and another officer was injured during a motorcade in February 2006.

• On Tuesday 17th November, two NYPD officers assigned to Vice President Joe Biden’s advance security team were hurt in a crash at about 5:30pm in Manhattan, and one other person was hurt in the incident. Three police vehicles – a marked police vehicle, an unmarked car and a bomb squad vehicle – were moving westbound on 49th Street, crossing 10th Avenue. The marked car blocked the intersection with its lights and sirens on, for the other two vehicles to cross. A New York City livery cab didn’t stop (according to the NYPD) and was then hit by the unmarked police car. The passenger in the cab was not hurt, but the cab driver was taken to hospital with neck and back injuries, while two police officers were also taken to hospital for minor injuries.

As for the Veep, he was travelling to appear on ‘The Daily Show with Jon Stewart’. He wasn’t near the accident and wasn’t hurt.

THE UNDERLYING REASON FOR THESE ‘ACCIDENTS’
We find Vice President Biden, if anything, even creepier and more sinister than his predecessor, the MK-ULTRA apparatchik and notorious Financial Terrorist, Richard B. Cheney. Two serious traffic accidents in two days, and three within a week, suggests that something’s ‘not quite right here’. Let’s consider what the problem could be.

The answer suggests itself almost immediately. Why is it necessary for the holders of the highest offices in the United States to be driven around in armoured vehicles, and at high speed in built-up areas? The cover answer, of course, will invariably be: to protect them against terrorist attack and assassination (given the Kennedy precedent). But another explanation, hidden behind this knee-jerk response, is this: these people are crooks and terrorists themselves.

Crooks involved in organised crime are in constant danger of horizontalisation.

This much was crystal clear when former President George W. Bush appeared in London for an official visit. A vast army of arrogant American intelligence officers, snipers, SWAT team specialists and other thuggists took over parts of London. What an advertisement for ‘democracy’!

BLAIR NIXED AS EUROPEAN PRESIDENT BY KISSINGER’S PAL
While the resolution of the dollar and settlements crisis appeared to be coming together amid extreme ongoing tension behind the scenes [see above], developments in Europe have shed an interesting light on the European head of the two-headed serpent directed against the ‘Main Enemy’, Britain and the United States.

As will be recalled, the former, discredited British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, was ‘pre-picked’ to become President of the illegal [see below] European Union Collective – a post that he sought with some desperation, not only because it would flatter his immensely inflated ego, but, more to the point, because it would provide him with the urgently needed protection that he needs in order to avoid arrest and indictment inter alia for war crimes, and probably for financial crimes as well.

In the event, the French and Germans – who ‘run’ the EU as a joint venture, under the terms of their Treaty of the Elysée of January 1963 which has no expiry date and requires the two powers to reach ‘an analogous position’ ahead of all international decisions and conferences with which they are involved – balked at the idea of the arrogant Blair (with his ‘star quality’) eclipsing them on the fake EU stage, although (see below) they had good reasons for their reticence. Instead of Blair and a host of other non-entities, they chose the Belgian Prime Minister, Herman Van Rompuy (11).

And what do you suppose is this previously obscure Belgian apparatchik’s ‘qualification’?

Why, he’s a friend of Dr Henry (‘Heinz’ or ‘Henny’) Kissinger – the triple agent serving as the DVD manipulator-in-chief and probable controller of George H. W. Bush Sr. (if he’s still vertical) – the operative whose unmatched arrogance is such that he has never bothered to correct his heavy guttural German accent, to this day.

• Geddit?

POINTEDLY TIMED QUERIES RAISED ABOUT BLAIR’S DEALINGS
Now, in order to ‘make quite sure’ that there was no chance of Blair being ‘elected’, care was taken by a British intelligence cadre, we think, to leak compromising financially-related information about the former British Prime Minister’s exotic business companies and partnerships. Specifically, on 15th November, The Sunday Telegraph reported that Blair had failed to register a highly complex Maxwell-style network of businesses with the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (ACOBA), yet another watchdog or quango (Quasi-Government Enterprise) set up to monitor the propensity for former corrupt Ministers to cash in on their inside knowledge after leaving office.

It transpired that Blair established a network of entities called Windrush Ventures as soon as he left office. According to a City accountant who has studied the relevant Blair accounts that are filed at Companies House, in Cardiff, the structure has been set up ‘in a way that discourages clarity’. He elaborated: ‘The situation is further muddled because the companies file accounts for different time periods. This is a common tactic to confuse people as to what is going on. You cannot be sure what transactions are occurring in what period’.

As Windrush Ventures No. 3, a profitmaking partnership owned by Mr. Blair, was established as a limited partnership, it does not have to publish accounts. However, through the other Windrush accounts, it is possible to show how Windrush Ventures No. 3 had an income of millions of pounds, including large sums for ‘philanthropic and charitable works’. Forensic analysis revealed a $2.4 million ‘grant’ from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ‘intended for Sierra Leone’, and a further £1.5 million ‘for Rwanda’ from the Gatsby Charitable Foundation set up by Lord Sainsbury, a former Minister in Blair’s Government.

Meanwhile the accounts of Windrush Ventures No. 2, a limited liability partnership, show that it received £6,436,000 ‘in connection with management services that it has provided to Windrush Ventures No. 3’. And Windrush Ventures No. 2 also received a ‘share of the net profits of the LP [Windrush Ventures No. 3], amounting to £350,000’.

The accounts further show that Windrush Ventures No. 2 then ‘paid £6,436,000 for management services that were provided by… Windrush Ventures Limited’.

This entity is ‘said to pay the rent on’ Mr. Blair’s grand offices in Grosvenor Square, the location of the American Embassy, in Central London. Sparse accounts for Windrush Ventures No. 1 filed at Companies House show that its ‘ultimate owner is A. C. L. Blair’ and that it was established on 27th June 2007, the day that Mr Anthony Charles Linton Blair left Number Ten Downing Street.

Further investigations have revealed that a separate network of Tony Blair-owned limited liability partnerships and limited companies, called Firerush Ventures, has also been identified. WIND and FIRE: two highly evocative ESOTERIC words which cannot possibly have been chosen in ignorance of the signal that they send to ‘the initiated’ ‘Black’ World – namely, the Illuminati. (12).

BLAIR’S OCCULT NOMENKLATURE FOR HIS COMPANIES
Thus it has transpired that the former British Prime Minister uses occult nomenclature to label his ventures, and that he has established complex Maxwell-style networks of interrelated partnerships and companies for what purpose: to hide certain illicit and dubious accruals arising from payments received for going along with the Bush Crime Family’s war plans, or for ‘facilitating’ the collective European treaty before the current one [see Archive: 12th October 2005], by any chance?

It will be recalled that former criminalist President William Jefferson Clinton’s ‘Foundation’, which had to be exposed late last year when the CIA-wife of the former President had to scramble to be appointed Secretary of State by Obama in order to be ‘assured’ of ‘protection’, was found to hold millions in assets paid to ‘it’ by every category of Illuminati hidey-hole under the sun – including, scandalously, the Princess Diana Memorial Fund.

‘MAINSTREAM’ NOW UNDERSTANDS WHY BLAIR WANTED THE JOB
We can now state that a component of the British ‘mainstream’ newspaper press is showing signs of ‘understanding’ what it has conspicuously sidestepped ever since these investigations began, and before. On 22nd November, the Sunday Telegraph carried an exposé explaining, in outline, the consequences for Mr Blair of the fact that he had been bypassed in his quest for ‘protection’ as President of the European Union Collective. The newspaper suddenly sounded like this service:

‘The former Prime Minister had been intriguing and plotting to be appointed European President ever since he left Number 10 Downing Street more than two years ago’.

‘There are several reasons why he desperately wanted the job, but perhaps the main one concerns the immunity from prosecution seemingly enjoyed by all politicians in high office’ (13).

• BINGO! Do you hear the clatter of scales falling from ‘mainstream’ eyes here?

HIGH OFFICE OFFERS PROTECTION FROM PROSECUTION
What does this now tell us LOUD AND CLEAR – and in the ‘mainstream’ for Heaven’s sake, so that armchair critics who enjoy sniping us and finger-pointing that ‘because it’s not in the mainstream, it can’t be true’ have, all of a sudden, LOST their fraudulent cause for ‘complaint’?

• Why, it informs us, does it not, that THERE’S ONE LAW FOR THE HOI POLLOI, THE GOYIM, and another for holders of high office. Which we know from our long-term study of the abuse of power in the United States. But now we Brits have this truth thrust before our eyes, by the ‘mainstream’, no less. In other words, all those engaged in furthering the criminal, anti-nation state, collectivist, internationalist agenda, are GRANTED IMPLIED IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION, which means that they can perpetrate egregious financial and other crimes with impunity, so they imagine.

One small problem. As we know, serpents in a nest and rats in a sack have a tendency to turn and bite or destroy each other. Therefore, when an operative in this Black Firmament has reached his sell-by date, he is unceremoniously, and ruthlessly, sacrificed and thrown, to mix metaphors again, to the wolves. There is no love lost between thieves, and there is no love, in any case, to lose.

• These people not only collaborate closely at all times, but stand ready to hate each others’ guts: the familiar George H. W. Bush/DVD-CIA ‘bait and switch’ technique.

The Sunday Telegraph’s article elaborated: ‘Blair is well aware that if he had become President of the European Council, it would have been very hard to bring him to account’.

So Blair’s Windrush and Firerush Ventures were aired in the newspaper’s daily namesake just to make sure that any residual chance of the European Collective appointing this operative, sank to nil. The Sunday newspaper then delved, of course, into the implications of the imminent Chilcot Inquiry into the background to the Iraq War.

THE TWIST BEHIND THE CHILCOT INQUIRY INTO THE IRAQ WAR
Now underlying this matter there lurks an even more extraordinary twist – one that we published, via our intelligence newsletter Arab-Asian Affairs, starting in the autumn of 2003 (14).

If matters now proceed as expected, the central allegation under review is or will be whether the former Prime Minister lied to the British people, when he said that Britain had to go to war against Iraq because the Iraqi leader possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMD).

Blair delivered a ‘brilliant and passionate speech in the House of Commons on March 18, 2003, that won over doubters that Britain had no other option but to join the United States in its invasion of Iraq – a military operation that culminated in the greatest humiliation for British forces since Suez in 1956’, according to The Sunday Telegraph. And the reason that Blair gave in his Commons speech was that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction.

‘Without his doom-laden warnings about WMDs, Blair would never have won that Commons vote and Britain would never have gone to war’, The Sunday Telegraph elaborated.

THE EDITOR’S ENCOUNTER WITH A PENTAGON SPY
In the final quarter of 2004, the veteran British journalist and author (of books on Maxwell and Mossad), Gordon Thomas, agitated for this Editor to meet a Pentagon-related operative named Demchuk, known as ‘The Visitor’ in Washington circles, without explaining why. Gordon Thomas insisted that ‘he is very keen to meet you’, but the Editor refused. Thomas responded that ‘he’s perfectly safe: he’s been checked out by MI-6’; and in the end, against his better judgment (harder to crack nowadays), the Editor relented.

An arrangement was made for the Editor to meet this fellow, believe it or not, in the fishing tackle department of a sports shop on Fifth Avenue in New York City. He’d be wearing a raincoat.

Sure enough, there he was at the very end of the store, at the appointed time. His suggestion was that we should repair to the Algonquin Hotel – where he proceeded to pump the Editor about the renegade, fugitive (since incarcerated) Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) operative, Mark Delmart Vreeland. This US ONI operative had been the single response that the Editor had received after publishing the first evaluation of the Bush-DVD Financial Frauds, with documents, in International Currency Review, Volume 28, Number 4 – which had been released in March 2003, just ahead of the invasion of Iraq (the worst possible timing in one sense, but pertinent in another).

As we have reported elsewhere, Vreeland contacted the Editor (from Yukon, where he had been hiding out, it later transpired), in May 2003. In pursuit of these investigations, the Editor had rashly agreed to meet Vreeland, at Penn Station, New York City: but on arrival, he changed the venue to Niagara Falls, Canada (a standard procedure by these people). Vreeland scammed the Editor of this service throughout this venture, but that’s a separate story.

THE SOVIET SHIPS THAT REMOVED THE IRAQI WMD
Anyway, after pumping the Editor on Vreeland at the Algonquin Hotel, the US Pentagon-linked operative kept in touch. He expressed particular interest in our exposure in Arab-Asian Affairs (September 2003) of the fact that the Iraqis DID possess weapons of mass destruction, and that these WMDs were dismantled and removed shortly ahead of the invasion, in two Soviet ships that sailed from the Iraqi port of Umm Qasr.

The open source of this intelligence was a senior Romanian defector (the former intelligence chief, Ion Mihai Pacepa), who had explained, in the public domain, that all Soviet-linked countries had a programme, which the Romanians called their ‘Sarindar programme’, for dismantling WMDs should pressure from the West exceed a certain safety level – as had clearly occurred in the case of Iraq.

Now the US operative could perfectly well have conducted this simple research – which the Editor backed up, by the way, with data publicised by Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) itself – without relying on this Editor’s services. At a later stage, he asked for copies of all our publications, which he said he would ensure were paid for: and of course he never paid us a cent.

In March 2005, he appeared to be most annoyed when the Editor handed him, in Washington DC, the new issue of International Currency Review in which much more detail about the Fraudulent Finance operations presided over by Bush and Greenspan, was exposed. Earlier, he had arranged to meet the Editor for breakfast at the Savoy Hotel in London, but he never turned up (a technique they use to establish whether one is a reliable source or not). When he had full made use of us, he severed the connection. Which is also ‘what they do’.

The open domain information that we published in 2003 was that Saddam Hussein’s régime had indeed possessed weapons of mass destruction, but that the Iraqi WMD installations and assets had been removed ahead of the invasion, in accordance with the Iraqi version of the ‘Sarindar programme’. So, why was our elaborated version of this open domain information not picked up by the ‘mainstream’ (even if they had pinched it from us without attribution, as often occurs)?

WHY THE REMOVAL OF THE IRAQI WMD WAS SUPPRESSED
Here’s your answer: BECAUSE the weapons of mass destruction in question had been supplied extensively by the United States, under the direction of Saddam Hussein’s former financial trading partner, George Herbert Walker Bush – who had performed his usual ‘bait and switch’ operation against Saddam in 1990, when April Glaspie, the incongruous female US Ambassador to Baghdad, had ‘winked’ at Saddam in the sense that she had implied (duplicitously, of course) that the United States would turn a blind eye should Saddam Hussein proceed with his intention to annexe Kuwait.

PENTAGON AGENT TASKED TO FIND OUT WHAT WE KNEW
What Demchuk was trying to find out, then, was not the truth of the matter, which he would have known, but rather what WE knew about all this, and whether there was any actual danger that our knowledge might expose the duplicity of the US Government in this matter.

Meanwhile, in line with the unusual arrogant disdain displayed by the US authorities for the British, the British Prime Minister was left with the CORRECT knowledge that Saddam Hussein’s régime DID possess weapons of mass destruction, which his intelligence subordinates had FAILED TO INFORM HIM had been removed aboard the Soviet ships sailing from Umm Qasr (February 2003).

The British intelligence officials who appear to have misled Blair were headed by the chief of MI-6, the Germanophile Sir John Scarlett, who has just retired, but will appear before the Chilcot Inquiry. The Sunday Telegraph’s report noted that Blair has a ‘haunted look’ about him. This is because, although he became a co-conspirator and an accessory to the fact of unspeakable crimes, the actual reality is that he was, as usual, SET UP by the Americans – under George W. Bush.

BLAIR TO BE MADE THE SCAPEGOAT FOR OTHERS
Co-conspiring to set up Blair were senior officials within MI-6, who must have known what a simple outside Editor could find out for himself in the public domain.

• And what will their primary motivation be before the Chilcot Inquiry? It will be to confirm Blair as the SCAPEGOAT for THEIR CO-CONSPIRATORIAL duplicity and deception in collaboration with the US criminalist operatives in the White House.

Given the above, it will be very interesting to observe whether any of this surfaces at the Chilcot Inquiry, whether the name ‘Sarindar’ again appears in the public domain – and whether the Inquiry summons the Editor of this service to reiterate what has just been published above.

• If none of these indicators appear, you will know that the Chilcot Inquiry is itself intended to deceive: not to tease out the truth, but rather to bury it. And the purpose of THAT will be to protect the Bush Crime Family and the criminality of the Bush and Reagan Administrations in arming Iraq.

SAME CYNICAL PROCEDURE IS BEING APPLIED TO IRAN
YES, the purpose of any such intent will be to continue the cover-up of the complicity of the Nazi cadres within the US structures in equipping the Iraqi régime with weapons of mass destruction – in order to be in a position to seize Iraq later, on the false pretext that Iraq posed a threat to humanity: EXACTLY THE SAME PROCEDURE that is now being applied to Iran today.

That’s why the Iranian President is a soi-disant Jew-hating Jew. His real name, by his own open admission, is Sabourjian – which means ‘maker of the prayer shawls’: the Farsi name for the Jewish shawl used for prayer. The suffix ‘jian’ means ‘Jew’. President Ahmadinejad himself acknowledged this in an odd incident when he displayed his passport, openly revealing this information to the cameras. Iranian sources with whom we are in touch have separately confirmed to us that this information is accurate, and is now well known in Iran.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION OPERATING MORE ILLEGALLY THAN EVER
Having selected Kissinger’s friend, the Belgian Prime Minister, as President of the European Union Collective, the European Commission, under the reappointed little fellow José Manuel Barroso, is continuing to represent itself before the world as a legitimate system of governance, contrary to the following realities which the ‘mainstream’ largely chooses to ignore:

• Effective 31st October 2009, the entire European Commission had to resign at the end of its term. This is standard practice. However little Sr. Barroso was somehow ‘reappointed’. In the meantime, the European Commissioners have remained ILLEGALLY at their posts, pending (so it is said) the appointment by the 27 so-called ‘Member States’, through Barroso, of new Commissioners.

The illegality of this behaviour is pooh-poohed by the Europhiles and internationalists as simply a practical measure, and that the Commissioners in place will not be taking any ‘major’ decisions (implying that they can take ‘minor’ decisions, even though ALL decisions they take have no legal force: not that ANY European law, regulation or rule has any legitimacy at all: see below).

BRITISH BANKS BEING TOLD WHAT TO DO BY AN IMPOSTOR
In fact, however, a Dutch harridan called Nellie Kroes, the Competition Commissioner (defunct), has CONTINUED ordering Lloyds TSB Bank and the Royal Bank of Scotland around as though she still retains powers as a Commissioner, which is NOT THE CASE: see above.

• Quite apart from anything else, once the wrangling over who is to hold what portfolio has been concluded, the new European Commissioners must go through an ‘approval’ process before the European Parliament (just as happens before the US Senate), a piece of meaningless theatre that nevertheless takes several months to complete. Prior to their confirmation approvals, European Commissioners have no powers as their appointments haven’t been ‘ratified’.

Moreover the instructions that this Dutch woman has been dispensing, represent what has been called ‘the economics of the madhouse’: she has been telling the banks in question to sell off their most profitable businesses, contrary to the interests of the British taxpayer. The taxpayer-owned UK institutions would be well within their rights to disregard every single instruction or goading that comes from Brussels for months, even if it is channelled through the British Government.

However all these people at high level are confused: they talk only among themselves, so they never emerge from the comfort zone of their illusions, about ‘Europe’ or anything else.

Beyond this, of course, lurks the reality, previously exposed here, of the fact that the European Commission’s accounts have not been approved by the EU’s own Court of Auditors for the past 14 years running. The political appointees at the Court of Auditors and their officials cannot sign off on European Commission accounts, as in doing so they would lay themselves open to prosecution for aiding and abetting financial fraud.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION ACCOUNTS ARE FRAUDULENT
In order for this intolerable state of affairs to be rectified, an army of independent accountants needs to crawl through each year’s EC accounts, starting with the last approved set of accounts 15 years ago (1994), identifying every single transaction that may appear to be dubious or fraudulent, establishing the truth of the matter, arranging for the perpetrators of frauds, both internally within the Commission and externally, to be referred on to law enforcement, and progressing laboriously through each set of accounts until they reach the most recent – approving each set of accounts in succession until they can proclaim that the EC’s accounts have been placed back in order – with all stolen funds and frauds, along with those responsible, exposed and reported for indictment.

THEREFORE, THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE
Will this happen? Of course not. THEREFORE, the European Commission is a criminal enterprise.

The incoming Commission will simply carry on where its corrupt predecessors left off. Given this intolerable state of affairs, this service has recommended that all UK VAT taxation receipts must be diverted with immediate effect into a British Treasury account established for this purpose.

The Editor informed a London conference on 31st October 2009 about this: and received THREE standing ovations. The way to deal with these people is to use the same techniques against their criminality that we have used successfully against the American financial criminals: EXPOSURE.

It remains the case, of course, that the EU’s Lisbon Treaty is illegal, for reasons explained earlier, including the careless handling of the Irish ballot boxes contrary to proper practice. At the last count, FOUR cases questioning the legality of the Referendum were pending before the Irish Supreme Court, which could overthrow the Irish Referendum outcome, even though it has been signed off by Ireland’s internationalist President. [All Irish Presidents are fully paid-up members of the self-appointed internationalist cadres, given that Ireland has been penetrated since the early 20th century by pan-German forces seeking to destabilise the ‘Main Enemy’, Britain].

DESPITE ALL THIS, A PAN-EUROPEAN GESTAPO IS BEING PLOTTED
The illegal Lisbon Treaty (as illegal as all its many predecessors, which were procured by means of corrupt payola payments: see the first report in our Archive, dated 12th October 2005), provides for the establishment of a Europe-wide Gestapo – which will please the STASI operative Frau Merkel, Bush Sr.’s agent, given that the STASI were/are Gestapo in a different (Communist) guise.

Under a section of the Treaty which had not even been quasi-ratified at the time, EC officials set up a Committee on Internal Security (COSI) (16) which is to ‘coordinate policy between the national law enforcement and EU organisations’. Its ultimate purpose is to evolve into an EU Home Office with authority over the satrap ‘Member States’ security services and police.

If the Germanophile Sir John Scarlett were still in charge, that would be ‘just fine’ with him. But whether MI-5 and MI-6 will be prepared to go along with this further stage of the ‘coup d’état by instalments’ against this component of ‘the Main Enemy’, (17), remains to be seen.

GERMAN-RUSSIAN RELATIONS ARE ‘INDISSOLUBLE’
To conclude (almost), you may be interested to learn the following rather obscure fact.

On 10th June 2009, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, Vice-Chancellor and Minister of Foreign Affairs for the Federal Republic of Germany, addressed a meeting in Moscow on the scintillating theme… ‘Russia and Germany: Common History Never Ends’.

The German Vice-Chancellor’s speech opened with the following proclamation:

‘German-Russian relations have for centuries been those of close association, even a symbiotic relationship extending far beyond family relations…’.

Echoing Mikhail Gorbachëv, Bush Sr.’s ‘partner’ with former German Chancellor Kohl in Barrington Investment Group, AG (Deutsche AG), Steinmeier elaborated:

‘Let us work together on a new partnership for security and stability [stretching] from Vancouver to Vladivostok…… We should leave behind the obsolete stereotypes of the 20th century and even the 19th century’ (18). In other words, let’s build a SINGLE POLITICAL SPACE UNDER OUR CONTROL.

The phrase ‘Vancouver to Vladivostok’ was repeated like a Goebbels-era lie by Gorbachev when he was in the Soviet driving seat. In other words, Germany and Russia, are ‘on the same page’, aided and abetted by France under the terms of the Treaty of the Elysée with Germany. It may have been generally forgotten, too, that former President Chirac, of Jewish extraction like his successor, was Chairman of a Trilateral Commission consisting of Russia, Germany and France: yet another engine promoting The New Underworld Order fuelled by open-ended corruption. Unsurprisingly, a cloud of corruption hangs over Chirac, just as it hangs over Blair, the Bushes and the Clintons.

And as for Frau Merkel, as we have repeatedly pointed out, she was the Secretary, in her youth, of the Agitation and Propaganda Department of the Kommunist Yugend at Karl-Marx University.

• So she has no problem whatsoever in collaborating with the covert Soviets.

‘IT DOESN’T MATTER THAT IT’S NOT TRUE. WHAT MATTERS IS THAT IT’S OUT THERE’.
Finally, you may possibly recall these cynical words of the aforementioned veteran British journalist and author, Gordon Thomas. He told the Editor this late in 2004, after informing him that MI-6 had lied to the British media that Christopher Story was involved in the aborted attempted putsch in Equatorial Guinea (involving Sir Mark Thatcher, Simon Mann, and other dubious characters).

Subsequently, Demchuk, introduced to the Editor by gordon Thomas [see above] attempted to entrap the Editor in some venture in Monaco involving Bernie Ecclestone, Blair’s associate; but when the Editor expressed blank amazement on being advised of this by phone, Mr Demchuk was taken aback. Because the Editor said: ‘You’d better go back to your source because I have no idea what you’re talking about’. Whereupon Demchuk, after a pause, commented: ‘That’s worrying, in view of where this came from’.

We have assumed that it came from MI-6 (although there is a possibility that Gordon Thomas, who has published, as indicated, books on Mossad and Maxwell, may have cited MI-6 when he really meant Mossad). Either way, the point had been well and truly made by criminal intelligence sources that it is permissible to bear false witness against an investigative reporter and Editor, and that spreading lies about him to the media is permissible.

It is not: it is a criminal offence, and in conveying these lies, both Demchuk and Gordon Thomas stand accused of bearing false witness, aiding and abetting an operation to entrap and deceive the Editor of this service, and attempting to close down private investigations which have yielded, in the event, spectacular results.

Indeed the stupidity of the foregoing behaviour can be summarised in the following statement: it was partly because pressure was brought to bear on this Editor as described in part above, that we have persisted with our enquiries. As Gordon Thomas explained: ‘They think you may be dangerous as you have the documents and you control your own publications’.

Thomas thereby acknowledged that ‘they’ had something truly monumental to hide: and so it has proved. We will have more to say about the similar, equally desperate, lies disseminated about the Editor of this service by the self-discrediting US ‘bloggist’, Thomas Heneghan, and the reasons for them, in due course. But a further shoe has to drop first.

Notes and References:

(1): Erie Times-News, Tuesday, 17th November 2009: ‘China places GE order: Local plant strikes deal for 300 kits’, page 1.

(2): ‘The $2.5 trillion global oil scam’, www.ngoilgas.com/news, analysis by Philip Davis: a global oil scam that mades Madoff look like a petty thief.

(3): ‘US military chiefs are like Martians, say British officers’,
The Daily Telegraph, 23rd November 2009, page 1.

(4): ‘Afghan mission cannot go on for ever, says Brown’,
The Daily Telegraph, 14th November 2009, page 4.

(5): ‘Hain’s concerns expose Cabinet alarm over Afghan war deaths: Minister breaks ranks to question strategy’, The Times, 14th November 2009, page 5.

(6):The Times, 14th November 2009, page 5, op. cit.

(7): The Daily Telegraph, 14th November 2009, page 4, op. cit.

(8): ‘Man killed by VP’s Secret Service vehicles, Scott McCabe,
The Examiner, 12th November 2009: smccabe@washingtonexaminer.com.

(9): ‘Biden escort involved in wreck’, Albuquerque Journal, 16th November 2009.

(10): ‘VP Biden’s Security involved in Crash’, MYFOXNY.COM, 18th November 2009.

(11): ‘Brown went for second best ‘as way of splitting the Tories’,
The Times, 21st November 2009, page 12.

(12): ‘Questions over Blair and his business ventures’,
The Sunday Telegraph, 15th November 2009, page 14.

(13): ‘Iraq Report: Secret papers reveal blunders and concealment’,
The Sunday Telegraph, 22nd November 2009.

(14): ‘The Iraqi ‘Sarindar’ Programme’, Arab-Asian Affairs, ISSN 0196-3538,
Volume 27, Number 8, September 2003.

(15): ‘Ahmadinejad’s Jewish Background’, Arab-Asian Affairs, ISSN 0196-3538,
Volume 33, Number 2, October 2009.

(16): ‘Treaty allows EU to set up ‘secret police committee’’,
The Sunday Telegraph, 4th October 2009.

(17): Henry Ashby Turner Jr., ‘Hitler’s Thirty Days to Power: January 1933’, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc, Reading, MA, ISBN 0-201-40714-0, 1996:

‘Only by banning the Communist deputies and by resorting to intimidation and mendacity did Hitler secure on March 23 the necessary two-thirds vote in the new Reichstag for an Enabling Act that transferred legislative authority to his Cabinet, ostensibly for four years. A wave of Nazi purges followed, as one institution after another was subjugated. Arbitrary rule replaced government by law in what has aptly been termed a “coup d’état by instalments”’.

‘By summer, all parties except the Nazis had been dissolved, Hugenberg had been forced out of the Cabinet, and Hitler had relegated Papen to insignificance by winning the trust of the President. Even earlier, Göring had wrested from Papen control over the government of the largest state, Prussia. Well before the Nazi leader assumed the powers of the Presidency upon the death of Hindenburg in August 1934, he had become dictator of Germany’: page 164.

The phrase ‘coup d’état by instalments” was coined by a US-resident German, Konrad Heiden, Der Fehrer, Boston, 1944, page 579. What Hitler procured – by subterfuge and mendacity, exactly as has been the case throughout with the European Union Collective – was the transfer to his Cabinet, and thence to himself, of GENERAL POWERS. This is precisely what happened, for instance, when Britain joined the EEC in 1972. The legislation in question served the purposes of an Enabling Act. This act of treachery was perpetrated by Edward Heath, a long-standing agent for Germany: see the first report in this series: 12th October 2005: Atchive].

(18): ‘Russia and Germany: Common History Never Ends’, Text of a speech delivered by Frank-Walter Steinmeier, Vice-Chancellor and Minister of Foreign Affairs, Federal Republic of Germany, on 10th June 2009 in Moscow: International Affairs, 14 Gorokhavskii per, Moscow 103064, Russian Federation, Volume 55, Number 5, 2009.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

BERNANKE PERSONALLY BLOCKING THE U.S. PAYOUTS

NEW YORK FED’S $500 TRILLION DERIVATIVES ‘BLACK HOLE’ IS EXPOSED

Sunday 6 September 2009 20:00

• ALL OFF-BALANCE SHEET FUNDS ARE ‘FROZEN’

• BERNANKE AND GEITHNER HAVE BEEN TAKING ORDERS FROM BUSH SR.

• UPDATE, 11 SEPTEMBER 2009:
IT HAS BEEN INACCURATELY ASSERTED ON ANOTHER WEBSITE THAT THE EDITOR PAID FOR WANTA’S RELEASE FROM JAIL. THIS IS AN OLD C.I.A. LIE WHICH HAS BEEN PROMULGATED FOR TWO YEARS OR MORE. The Editor did NOT procure Mr Wanta’s release from jail which of course is impossible. The Editor loaned Leo/Lee Wanta $35,000 for two years on an arms’-length basis at 7% compound per annum, effective 10th June 2005 and repayable on 11th June 2007.

• He did not repay the Editor’s $35,000. He has STOLEN THE EDITOR’S LOAN FUNDS.

The purpose of the loan was to settle Court ‘Restitution’ plus fees in respect mainly of State Tax of $14,129 plus interest that Wanta had already paid twice, in May and June 1992 (we hold copies of the relevant transaction documents). The Editor’s private loan funds paid this tax bill for the THIRD time. Full details of this scandal were exposed in our final report on that subject, dated 6th August 2007 [see Archive]. But that is NOT the main point of this insert, necessitated by the repetition of this old C.I.A. LIE, exploiting the timing of the loan. The LIE masks a colossal hornets’ nest of evil.

The main point is as follows. The subtle C.I.A.-originated LIE that the Editor paid for Wanta’s release from PRISON presupposes (deceitfully) that Wanta was released in 2005 WHICH IS NOT TRUE. On the contrary, Wanta was released from jail eight or ten days after 9/11 (on 19th or 21st September 2001). But by reiterating that the Editor’s funds procured Wanta’s release from JAIL, the FALSE impression is given that Wanta emerged from U.S. prison FOUR YEARS after 9/11: A FABRICATION.

Wanta was collected from jail shortly after 9/11 by Gerald Salchert, resident in the United States, of Austrian extraction, and taken to the home of a relative in Wisconsin.

WHY would the C.I.A. promulgate this LIE (and we will explain later WHO started this LIE)? In order to answer that question you need to be aware of the real reason Wanta was held in jail during the run-up to 9/11. The reason is that, since Wanta had been scammed and badly treated (which maybe he deserved: but that’s a separate point), the C.I.A. had concerns that he might divulge the 9/11 plans AHEAD OF THE ABOMINATION. So they held him incarcerated until afterwards.

• What does this tell you? Work it out for yourself! Mr Wanta KNEW ABOUT 9/11 IN ADVANCE of the event, and they had to make sure that he didn’t spill the beans because of his dissatisfaction at the way he had been treated. SO THEY HAVE EXPLOITED THE DATE OF THE EDITOR’S LOAN PAYMENT, WHICH OBTAINED WANTA’S EXIT FROM PROBATION (gaining him five years and two weeks, to be precise, as his scheduled probation end-date had been 28th November 2010), TO COVER UP THE FACT, EXPOSED BY THIS LIE, THAT THE C.I.A. AND THE U.S. GOVERNMENT KNEW ALL ABOUT 9/11 BEFORE IT HAPPENED. Because as Leo/Lee Wanta, who worked for the Government and the Bush Crime Syndicate, knew about 9/ 11 BEFORE the event, SO DID THE U.S. GOVERNMENT and the C.I.A. If you think this is DYNAMITE, you are 100% ACCURATE.

• OUR CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE STEALING OF OUR PUBLISHED WORKS AND BREACH OF
COPYRIGHT, AN OPERATION ORCHESTRATED BY THE C.I.A. TO ENTICE US INTO LITIGATION:

• On the morning of Monday 7th September, one of our associates walked into the offices of an operation in Utrecht, Netherlands, that had been engaged in the illegal stealing of the Editor’s work, published by Edward Harle Limited, entitled The New Underworld Order, which can ONLY be obtained legally direct from our London and New York offices and via this website [books section].

• Well over 10,000 copies of our book had been illegally stolen (downloaded) from mininova.com. The image of the book displayed on that website was cropped so that the ISBN ref: 1-899798-05-6 had been cut away, while the copyright page [page iv] was MISSING, indicating with crystal clarity that all concerned were fully aware that this represented a grievous copyright breach.

• Furthermore, the download text (of which we retain a complete paper copy and a pdf) was ADULTERATED. Confronted by our associate with a copy of the book, showing the cover and the copyright page, the Dutch perpetrators removed our book from their website immediately, thereby acknowledging the theft. The site in question deceitfully boasts that no material on their platform is copyright material, which is a brazen lie. We have other measures in store for this operation.

• Our associate rang the bell, knocked at the door, and then tapped at the window, in office hours. Personnel refused to let him into the building, but instead exited the front door and spoke to him in the street. Our associate showed our book to the two people who had emerged from the building, indicating that the front cover as shown on their website excluded the ISBN reference, and then opened the book at the copyright page. The personnel behaved in a somewhat shifty and rather insolent manner, accepted that they were in grievous breach of copyright, then retreated into the building, and proceeded to remove the adulterated version of The New Underworld Order from their website. By discourteously not allowing our associate to enter the building, they inadertently confirmed that the operation is an intelligence front. Very shabby, second rate tradecraft.

• A similar crooked entity in the Geneva area in Switzerland has stolen nearly 1,300 copies of our work, The Perestroika Deception, by the Soviet defector, Anatoliy Golitsyn, edited by Christopher Story, in which we hold world rights. The copyright belongs to Anatoliy Golitsyn. There will be repercussions from these brazen revolutionary thefts of the intellectual property of others.

• This places perpetratrors of these wanton thefts, which are designed to put smaller publishers out of business so that only the doctored, ‘politically correct’ ‘line’ on any sensitive subject stays in the public domain, on notice that we will take UNCONVENTIONAL MEASURES to close down this impertinent menace so far as we are concerned, and that we will make sure that perpetrators are shamed and named by all means at our disposal. As for the US Intelligence Power, you are also placed on notice that we will expose your dirty tricks and your snide attempts to inveigle us into financially destructive litigation. Your dirty tricks stink in the nostrils of the whole world.

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

CALLING EVIL GOOD, AND GOOD EVIL
‘Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!’

‘Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!’
Isaiah, Chapter 5, verses 20-21.

‘WE’LL KNOW OUR DISINFORMATION PROGRAM IS COMPLETE WHEN EVERYTHING THE AMERICAN PUBLIC BELIEVES IS FALSE’: William Casey, Director of Central Intelligence: An observation by the late Director at his first staff meeting in 1981. This observation reveals the mentality of cynicism which infests the US Federal control structures, and the reality that these structures regard the American people with total contempt. This attitude is the opposite to the noble concept of service to the American people which ought to inspire holders of public office, and therefore represents the epitome of decadence.

The evil spirit directing William Casey got the better of him when he committed suicide in hospital some years later, ostensibly to ‘protect the President’. The fantastic verbal fantasies perpetrated on certain US websites that are operating on the basis of Mr Casey’s principle, enunciated above, should therefore be handled with extreme care. Casey warned you!

HOW TO HANDLE OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THESE EVIL PEOPLE
‘Fret not thyself because of evil-doers, neither be thou envious against the workers of iniquity.
For they shall soon be cut down like the grass, and wither as the green herb’.
Psalm 37, verses 1 and 2.

‘The wicked plotteth against the just, and gnasheth upon him with his teeth. The Lord shall laugh at him: for he seeth that his day is coming. The wicked have drawn out the sword, and have bent their bow, to cast down the poor and needy, and to slay such as be of upright conversation. Their sword shall enter into their own heart, and their bows shall be broken’. Psalm 27, verses 12-15.

‘I have seen the wicked in great power, and spreading himself like a green bay tree. Yet he passed away, and lo, he was not; yea, I sought him, but he could not be found’. Psalm 37, verses 35-36.

‘The transgressors shall be destroyed together; the end of the wicked shall be cut off. But the salvation of the righteous is of the Lord; he is their strength in the time of trouble. And the Lord shall help them, and deliver them; he shall deliver them from the wicked, and save them, because they trust in Him’. Psalm 37, verses 38-40.

JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS ON FINANCIAL FRAUD:
‘Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you.

Your riches are corrupted, and your garments are motheaten.

Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days.

Behold, the hire of the labourers who have reaped down your fields, which is of you kept back by FRAUD, crieth; and the cries of them which have reaped are entered into the ears of the Lord….

Ye have lived in pleasure on the earth, and been wanton; ye have nourished your hearts, as in a day of slaughter. Ye have condemned and killed the just; and he doth not resist you’.
James, Chapter 5, verses 1-6.

• TWO IMPORTANT CONSEQUENCES FROM THE LATEST SABOTAGE

• BUSH SR. ET AL SUDDENLY REALISED DERIVATIVES ARE WORTH ZILCH

• GEORGE BUSH SR. NEEDED TO BE REMOVED AT ONCE

• 285 PROMINENT PEOPLE TO BE ARRESTED ‘BEFORE CHRISTMAS’

• SOME POSSIBLY RELATED SEPTEMBER DATES

• CHINESE MOVE TO IMMOBILISE THE DERIVATIVES SECTOR

• MEANWHILE GEITHNER CARRIES ON PROMOTING DERIVATIVES

• THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE

• FINANCIAL TIMES MINDLESSLY SUPPORTS GEITHNER’S DOOMED CAMPAIGN

• GEITHNER’S DECEITFUL DEMARCHE TO THE G-20

• TREASURY SECRETARY IS WHISTLING IN THE WIND

• SWISS PRIVATE BANK TELLS CLIENTS TO SELL U.S. ASSETS

• CIA NEVER MAKES MISTAKES, SO HOW CAN IT LEARN FROM THEM?

• PRESIDENTS 42 AND 43 FLY TO TORONTO AFTER THE FUNERAL

• THE REASON BUSH SR. DIDN’T APPEAR IN THE BASILICA

• NO SPLIT: JUST A NEW CORRUPTION ‘OPPORTUNITY’

• SCANDALOUS SITUATION AT THE WORLD COURT

• CANADA SUDDENLY POSTS US$-DENOMINATED BOND SALE

• UNITED ARAB EMIRATES TO KINDLY OBLIGE, AS WELL

• NEW YORK FED HAS A $500 TRILLION ‘BLACK HOLE’

• MORE BELATED CHINESE MEASURES AGAINST FRAUDULENT FINANCE

• ORIGINAL THEFT OF DELMARVA TIMBER TRUST ASSETS

• DESPITE THIS CRISIS, BERNANKE WAS BLOCKING THE PAYOUTS

• CIA-PRESIDENT OBAMA IN SECRET CAHOOTS WITH BERNANKE

• POOR BERNANKE A VICTIM OF IDENTITY FRAUD

• FED IS (WAS) NO-GO AREA FOR U.S. LAW ENFORCEMENT CADRES

• BARNEY FRANK BELATEDLY CALLS FOR THE FED TO BE AUDITED

•‘EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION’ OF TOP CRIMINALS REQUIRED

• LIBYAN CONTROVERSY IS A U.S. FALSE FLAG OPERATION

• DAVID RIFKIN, A U.S. SCUMBAG, LECTURES US ON THE BBC

• THE CHENEY OIL OPERATION IN LIBYA

• BRITISH SIMPLY TOOK A LEAF OUT OF THE U.S. BOOK

• CHENEY TRYING TO DESTROY U.S.-UK COOPERATION

• THE UNANSWERED AFGHANISTAN QUESTION JUST GOT NASTIER

• INSPIRING EXAMPLE SET BY THE MAYOR OF DONCASTER

• BRITISH MINISTRY OF DEFENCE IS BETRAYING THE PEOPLE

• A GLIMPSE OF REVOLUTIONARY REALITY IN THE BURMA CONTEXT

• BUSH PUSHED WAY BEYOND CO-CONSPIRATORS’ TOLERANCE

• SATAN WAS NOT CALLED THE SERPENT FOR NOTHING

• THE SERPENT IS A DISCIPLE OF LENIN [or rather, vice versa]

• TAKEN BY SURPRISE, THE SERPENT COULDN’T ORGANISE ITS OWN DEFENCE

• NO ‘GUTS’ ARE NEEDED! JUST DO IT!!

• WHEN WE STAND UP TO THEM, THEY ‘FALL BACK TO THE GROUND’

• INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW: Volume 34, Numbers 3 & 4 was published on 14th August and was being mailed worldwide on Monday 17th August 2009. It contains our devastating blow-by-blow reporting of astonishing behind-the-scenes events tearing the lawless intergovernmental environment apart, where anything goes, assets are ‘diverted’, and no-one is responsible.

However, as a specific consequence of these exposures, the net is decisively closing in on ALL criminalist financial operators, both within notorious official structures and in the international financial community, as is becoming clearer by the day. This 592-page report on what has been happening behind the scenes is now being lodged in places ‘where it matters’ around the world, which means that it is impossible for a veil to be drawn over this financial criminality, EVER.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice are comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor’s study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing global financial corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Just press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard. Or press the live Donate link at the top right-hand corner of this page. See also the ADVERTISEMENT below.

• The Editor’s $35,000 Wanta bail-out LOAN money plus interest has been stolen. This has not been denied for all the time that this true statement has been posted at this location! Wunderbar!

• See the second white panel for details of our latest distributed intelligence publications.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation, are appended at the foot of this report, below the legal data. See also our catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

• COPYRIGHT NOTICE REFERENCING THE STEALING OF OUR COPYRIGHTED BOOKS BY U.S. COPYRIGHT PIRATES APPEARS AT FOOT OF THIS REPORT ABOVE THE LEGAL DEFINITIONS.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and our ‘politically incorrect’ intelligence books online from this website.

NEW REPORT AND NOTES START HERE:

• NOTE:
This report covers developments and intelligence sifted up to a cut-off point of Thursday evening UK time, 3rd September 2009. THE U.S.-RELATED SEGMENTS ARE OUT OF DATE. We regret that, due to ‘the unfolding of events’ [Lenin: see Note (8) below] we cannot update beyond the cut-off time and neither can we comment any further for a number of days ahead. The narrative should be considered solely as ‘informed background’. The segment originally prepared for posting on 2nd September is clearly indicated. In some contexts, the tenses employed have not been altered.

• LEO WANTA: For the past several months or so, Wanta has been residing in a ‘safe house’ and has not continued in the residence of a family member. This confirmed development throws our earlier observations of the legal bind he was in due to his presence in Wisconsin, up in the air: and one reason for the move may precisely have been to address those issues.

Additionally, a number of wholly inconsequential ‘postings’ mentioning or attributed to Wanta which have appeared on one or more other websites, have represented elements of a ruse to throw sand in the faces of ‘the curious’. Their purpose will have been to provide a modicum of ‘continuity’ and to throw ‘the curious’ off the scent.

It remains a fact that the Editor’s $35,000 loan plus interest has been stolen. A letter from Leo Wanta indicating that he could not pay for the time being, due to his circumstances, would have sufficed to alleviate matters in the interim, but this was not forthcoming.

It would be no excuse at this late stage to say that he could not place such a matter in writing, since we hold a large library of undertakings that he has placed in writing, together with detailed faxed instructions to the Editor of this service. If he has been taken to a ‘safe house’ to hide him from the legal consequences of his theft(s), that could be construed as a provocative slap in the face of the Editor. But of course there are other, more pressing, reasons, no doubt.

The overall intelligence community lesson to be learned from this is that if intelligence operatives are going to interface with real investigative journalists, they had better not engage in tradecraft deception, or the likelihood will be that roadside timebombs will blow up in their faces.

• Put more succinctly: DO NOT PRESUME YOU CAN HOODWINK ALL THE PRESS ALL OF THE TIME. And surely, it should be obvious, now that Herr Bush Sr. is discredited, that the ‘bait and switch’ and ‘double-cross’ deception techniques, extensively publicised here, when deployed against journalists, are thoroughly discredited and past their sell-by date, as well.

• MEMORANDUM TO THOSE WHO TRIED TO DISCREDIT THE EDITOR VIA GORDON THOMAS, ‘THE VISITOR’ AND DASTYCH: These sordid techniques cannot be relied upon to deliver the anticipated results, since not everybody responds in textbook fashion to threats. At the latest count, the Editor had received 28 threats.

• A history of the deceptions perpetrated against the Editor is pending.

ALL OFF-BALANCE SHEET FUNDS ARE ‘FROZEN’
Following the ‘lockdown’ of the $14+ trillion of REAL on-the-books funds, including the previously referenced $6.2 trillion of LOAN money, on 10-12 September 2008, all off-balance sheet funds, the source of which cannot be identified, have been totally frozen and cannot be brought back onto the balance sheet. The CEO of Alchemy Partners, Jon Moulton, has now ‘jumped’ because of this.

Once the overdue Settlement payments in the United States have been unblocked by Dr Ben Bernanke, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, and Timothy Geithner, the US Treasury Secretary, both the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve will cease to exist in the format to which they and the world are accustomed, as they will necessarily be Basel-II (and Basel-III) compliant, which will mean that the most important question in the world – ‘What is the source of funds?’ – will govern ALL FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS. The dual system, with separate sets of books, will collapse.

The crisis has therefore reflected the ruthless determination of a handful of criminal US finance operatives, headed of late by Bernanke and Geithner, taking orders from Bush Sr., to defy the wishes of the international community by blocking the US dimension of the Settlement payouts in order to sustain this double-minded, corrupt system of ‘two sets of books’ that is collapsing.

BERNANKE AND GEITHNER WERE TAKING ORDERS FROM BUSH SR.
According to our sources, these two US criminal finance operatives were still interfering with the payments during the period of 48 hours when we held back a report prepared for posting effective 2nd September. It has been suggested by some that we made a mistake by announcing this fact, as our brief statement signifying the postponement was initially claimed to have been exploited by the criminal finance cadres to obfuscate the situation temporarily, to what they considered to be their advantage. On the other hand, we also received support for this action, as is typified by the rather flattering email reproduced in Note (1) and posted on another website.

• In any case, the final outcome shows that our judgment was in fact correct.

TWO IMPORTANT CONSEQUENCES OF THE LAST SABOTAGE
Nothing of significance had been lost because not only was it obvious from other evidence that the payout last week was about to be sabotaged anyway, but this episode did achieve the following outcomes, so we are informed:

• It decisively flushed out George H. W. D. V. D. Bush Sr. as issuing demands, instructions and physical threats to unnamed personnel, requiring them to sustain the sabotage operation.

Our information is that these threats were of a PHYSICAL nature – a quite interesting development, since this revealed that Bush Sr. HAD NO FINANCIAL LEVERAGE ANY MORE (for bribes), which we know to be the case. So he was forced to resort to barefaced murder threats instead.

• We are informed that certain parties have FINALLY, at long last, UNDERSTOOD, that one cannot reach any agreements or understandings AT ALL with serpents [see text at the foot of this report]. Quite astonishingly, we were told on 4th September that certain US personnel who ought to have found this out years ago, were at last obliged to acknowledge that one cannot negotiate with these people and that they need to be removed from the scene.

Hard though it may be for rational observers to comprehend, what we and others have recognised almost since the beginning, has ONLY NOW become apparent to the US cadres we are obliquely referring to here – as a DIRECT consequence of the sabotage operation perpetuated by Bernanke and Geithner and ordered by Bush Sr., which messed up the Settlements payments that were ready to go as of 1:00pm Eastern Daylight Time On Wednesday 2nd September 2009.

BUSH SR. ET AL SUDDENLY REALISED THE DERIVATIVES ARE WORTH ZILCH
Apparently this development was attributable, sources say, to the fact that certain fools stupidly offered Bush Sr. 2% (alternatively stated to be 2.5%) of some unquantified derivatives aggregate, which the serpent ‘turned down’. What all concerned appear not to have understood is that 2.0% or 2.5% of zero equals zero. Therefore, farcically, Bush Sr. actually turned down nothing. It was at this point that Bush Sr. appears to have realised that the Fraudulent Finance derivatives ‘assets’ are immobilised and de facto locked out of the on-the-books financial economy. Apparently when that happened, scales fell off certain previously blinded cadres’ eyes, and, at half past midnight, they realised that ‘one cannot reach agreement with serpents’. Quite why they couldn’t see that obvious fact when you and this Editor saw it years ago, is not explained. (Presumably it reflects the fact that some were corrupted and hoping to cut deals out of the funny money for themselves).

In this connection, certain sources advised us that, notwithstanding the above, ‘Bush Sr. is out of the picture’ – which is true; and yet, he was reported to us last week to have been issuing physical threats of liquidation, intimidating officials and bankers, and influencing the deception operations presided over by Bernanke and Geithner, whose ever more eccentric public statements continued to purport to assume that the off-balance sheet world could be restored to its former fraudulent glory – the current focus being on removing the infuriating British from all positions of influence and power as quickly as possible, and packing the international forums that matter with corrupt Third World operatives who can be relied upon to do what the US criminal financiers require.

[This plot is about to falter, too].

GEORGE BUSH SR. NEEDED TO BE REMOVED AT ONCE
Given this background, we were specifically asked last week to state that George Bush Sr. needed to be removed from the scene completely and IMMEDIATELY, not least given that his vituperative threats of murder which were reportedly being sprayed all over the place, were liable to lead to his arrest for uttering threats over the phone, which is a Federal offence (2) .

• Moreover we felt that the British Monarchical Power had every right, and should now proceed, to take the necessary drastic action against George H. W. D. V. D. Bush Sr. and the other American and UK financial terrorists, without further ado.

Hitherto no-one in the United States appears to have had the guts to do this. But this serpent is FINISHED, except that he appeared as late as last week STILL to have been able to interfere with the Settlements. It was being pointed out to us that Americans operate 800 bases around the world financed by funny money, and flaunt themselves as the big, most powerful military machine on the block: yet their cowardice HAS DISGUSTED the whole world because they appear to be so corrupt and compromised that they lack the guts to stamp on the head of this serpent.

That the serpent’s head has to be crushed is universally recognised AND IT MUST HAPPEN NOW, with no further feeble, pathetic prevarication indicative of inner rottenness and weakness – a state of affairs that is simply reinforcing international perceptions, where it matters, of the United States as an internally depraved pariah state.

Indeed we were advised by sources with European connections that this latest sabotage of the Settlements was likely to trigger an operation ‘to “hit” the Obama/Bush cartel if we aren’t paid tomorrow’ [email from an informed source, at 6:01pm UK time on Thursday 3rd September] (3) .

285 PROMINENT FIGURES TO BE ARRESTED
Another usually well-informed source (US) advised us on 4th September that ‘all 285 people’ who have been engaged in this criminal finance sabotage to block the payouts and associated matters concerning immense corruption ‘WILL BE ARRESTED BY CHRISTMAS’.

• We think this will occur rather sooner than that.

SOME DATES THOUGHT EARLIER TO BE SIGNIFICANT
It was also reported to us that the threats spewed out by the serpent were accompanied by an assertion, known to be false, that the payouts were to be blocked ‘until 15th September’. This of course was equivalent to saying ‘until the end of the solar system’, except for the following two important passing considerations:

• As reported in The Wall Street Journal on 3rd September (4) : ‘On September 16 2009, China will put into effect an agreement governing how their banks trade domestic derivative products among themselves. But as a condition of their dealing with foreign banks, China’s five largest commercial banks are seeking to impose tough credit demands that will be hard to comply with, according to certain lawyers and people at several foreign banks’.

CHINESE MOVE TO IMMOBILISE DERIVATIVES OPERATIONS
The Chinese banks concerned are Bank of China Ltd, Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd., China Construction Bank, Agricultural Bank of China Co., and Bank of Communications. The Wall Street Journal report elaborated that these Chinese banks ‘dominate the domestic money markets, supplying as much as 80% of market liquidity. Not being able to deal with them would punch a big hole in the operations of foreign banks in China’.

‘Under the new régime, banks will be allowed to trade [financially – Ed.] only with counterparties with whom they have signed a Master Agreement. That agreement will initially cover existing trading in interest-rate swaps, bond forwards, foreign exchange swaps and forwards, and cross-currency swaps. But the five big banks are insisting that foreign banks, and in some cases their major shareholders, guarantee the credit of their China units before they sign any agreement, according to foreign bankers with direct knowledge of the situation’.

‘Under existing arrangements, foreign banks can trade derivatives with the five big [Chinese] banks without providing credit guarantees’.

In other words, financial trading with the big five Chinese banks will, effective 16th September 2009, be restricted to THE FIRST LEVEL ONLY, cutting out a vast swathe of subsequent levels of derivative trades – which necessary reform will VIRTUALLY TERMINATE the derivatives operations of foreign banks with China. Unless the big Chinese banks have signed a Master Agreement with a foreign bank counterparty, they will not be permitted to engage in derivatives transactions AT ALL: hence the bleating by ‘lawyers and people at several foreign banks’ that their business is about to be decimated, destroyed or altered beyond recognition.

While the foregoing information on the Chinese trading stipulation is of exceptional significance, it will also of course have been noted that 16th September is one day later than the false ‘deadline’ fed by the criminal finance Godfather, George H. W. D. V. D. Bush Sr. During the week there were further ‘end of the solar system’ noises, too, suggesting, incorrectly, that the end of the current US fiscal year (30 September) would be the ‘next’ illicit ‘deadline’. Another significant fixture in this context was the late-September meeting of the Group of 20 scheduled for Pittsburgh, preparatory work for which was being transacted in London in early September.

Consistently with the correct Chinese attitude that ‘enough is enough already’, Associated Press reported on 3rd September that China is buying the first $50 billion of the International Monetary Fund’s initial Special Drawing Right (SDR) bond sale. Although this announcement was presented for public consumption in the usual knee-jerk context, promulgated in the IMF’s own statement [2nd September 2009] that this purchase ‘will boost the Fund’s capacity to help its membership weather the global financial crisis, and facilitate early recovery of the global economy’, the Chinese authorities paid for the purchase of $50 billion worth of SDRs with 341.2 billion yuan but in fact, by means of a complex foreign exchange configuration, disguising the fact that they were dumping dollars in order not to destabilise the market – a move which, as Zhang Bin, an international finance specialist at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said will ‘help to raise China ’s IMF status’.

MEANWHILE GEITHNER CARRIED ON WEIRDLY PROMOTING DERIVATIVES
While the Chinese have made it crystal clear that the Fraudulent Finance derivatives party is OVER, the US Treasury Secretary, who presided over the accumulation of the derivatives BLACK HOLE within the Federal Reserve Bank of New York of which he was President amounting to $500 trillion [see below], is attempting to bamboozle the Group of Twenty leaders into taking steps to ‘control’ the derivatives markets – the unspoken purpose of this deception being to ‘take it for granted’ that these Fraudulent Finance operations are to continue, which is not going to be the case.

Specifically, The Wall Street Journal reported on 4th September 2009 that ‘on Thursday, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner sent a letter to the G-20 leaders [meeting in preparatory session in London – Ed.], arguing that international agreement on higher bank-capital rules was necessary to protect the global financial system [unspoken: which his own terrorist finance stewardship at the New York Fed has so grievously corrupted – Ed.], and he called for a deal by the end of 2010’.

• FACT: It is STANDARD revolutionary procedure to keep kicking the timeframe out into the future. Every conference is concerned with setting the agenda for the subsequent conference. That way, the ‘Useful Idiocracy’ is bamboozled into believing that ‘progress’ (however defined) is being made towards whatever objective may be flavour of the month. Meanwhile the serpentine manipulators obfuscate the situation while always gaining more time.

•FACT: The US Treasury Secretary’s stance is deceitful. On the one hand, he and Bernanke were sabotaging and blocking the releases as stated above, on the orders of the world’s most sought-after financial criminal; while on the other hand, he is masquerading before the G-20 as a valiant defender of financial law and order. According to what we have been informed, this two-faced (dialectical, double-minded) behaviour isn’t being well received.

On the contrary, M. Jean-Claude Trichet, President of the European Central Bank, in announcing that ‘the ECB has an exit strategy from its non-standard measures in place’ (5) has, of late, most interestingly, aligned his institution effectively with the British Monarchical Power (contrary to the underlying purposes of the European Union Collective, which is to destroy all sources of British power permanently). The reason for this volte face is that the potential exists within this financial maelstrom for the European financial economy to be completely destroyed, since the collective currency, the Euro, has no backing – and is supported by no sovereign government. The European Union is not a sovereign entity: it is in fact an illusory construct which operates specifically, as the Editor reported and explained in his book The European Union Collective: Enemy of its Member States’, to usurp and crush the sovereignty of its weakened constituent satrap membership.

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE
Moreover the accounts of the European Commission have not been signed off for the past 14 years running by the EU’s own Court of Auditors, because they are fraudulent.

• Any auditor signing the European Commission’s accounts would lay himself open to prosecution for aiding and abetting false accounting.

Since this is the case, the British Government, for instance, is complicit in financial fraud because it channels UK taxpayers’ funds into the accounts of the European Commission which, given that its accounts are fraudulent and have been demonstrated to be fraudulent for the past 14 years, is a criminal enterprise. According to the Serious Fraud Office in London, it is illegal to pay taxpayers’ money into the hands of a criminal enterprise.

As previously recommended here, all British taxpayers’ VAT funding should therefore be diverted forthwith into special accounts at the British Treasury, where they can accumulate until such time as the past 14 years’ EC accounts have been rectified, restitution has been made for all the funds that have been misdirected and stolen, all officials, past and present, involved in these criminal diversions and thefts have been indicted and put on trial, and the British Government pronounces itself to be satisfied that the necessary standards of financial probity have finally been achieved.

Since of course this will never happen, the British Government could redeploy the accrued Value Added Tax inflows for the purposes of plugging the colossal holes punched recklessly into them by the Brown Government, and reviving the British economy which has been extensively ‘enronised’ by the operations of Godfather Bush in collaboration with his corrupt and subsequently double-crossed pal, Tony Blair (who has his come-uppance).

In the meantime, by aiding and abetting the criminal diversion of British taxpayers’ VAT funds, the British Government condemns itself as a co-conspirator in defrauding British taxpayers, and is therefore entitled to be classed as a Criminal Government (and not for this reason alone: but this will ‘do’ for the time being).

All of which further complicates the standing of the corrupt European Commission itself, even as it is being bombarded by the banks as they lobby this criminal enterprise intensively to try to prevent the inevitable confirmation that the Fraudulent Finance bonanza is almost totally finished – which of course will consign certain of these institutions that specialise in speculation, to oblivion.

FINANCIAL TIMES MINDLESSLY SUPPORTS CAMPAIGN
This campaign is being supported by the industry’s house organ, The Financial Times, London, which reported on 2nd September that ‘top investment banks and other big users of derivatives markets’ [prior to mid-September 2008, but this is never mentioned because those concerned don’t want to acknowledge that the derivatives sector remains moribund – Ed.] ‘have warned European Union regulators that there are limits to the extent to which over-the-counter contracts can be standardised and cleared centrally’.

“Standardisation is not a clear prerequisite for delivering the systemic and operational risk improvements sought by regulators… initiatives that would seek to standardise the terms of all OTC contracts are counterproductive”.

• This was the message to the European Commission [EC] from three associations representing investment banks and securities firms: the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, and the London Investment Banking Association, in a joint submission to the EC made public on 3rd September.

“Such initiatives can lead to ineffective hedging and incomplete transfer of risk. Leaving end-users with unwanted and unmanageable basis – that is, a mismatch between the specific risks they face and the non-specific, generic instruments that would be available in the market’ (6).

But The Financial Times’ idolatry of the dying Fraudulent Finance derivatives sector was sharply rebuffed on 4th September, when The Daily Telegraph’s Business section led with an article on the turmoil which has overtaken one of the most prominent of British private equity funds, Alchemy Partners, with the departure of its founder John Moulton – who, like the sharpest operators in this business, see the writing on the wall and are getting out IMMEDIATELY, so leaving the impending wreckage to others (who do not seem to realise what will be hitting them).

• Moulton’s exit will lead to a change in the ‘key man’ clause – entitling investors (leading banks, pension funds, university endowments and high net worth individuals) to pull out of their financial commitments to the fund (provided they can do so in practice, given the ‘unfolding of events’) because they will no longer benefit from Mr Moulton’s standing, prestige and expertise.

Amid expectations that Moulton’s departure would undermine Alchemy’s chances of raising fresh capital from investors, one insider was reported to have observed:

‘Alchemy certainly won’t be able to draw down any cash. In this market, people are desperate to get out of commitments and when they see an opportunity they grab it’ (7).

This devastating admission from a private equity fund ‘insider’ tells you, in one succinct sentence, that the obtuse behaviour of Geithner and Bernanke flies in the face of objective reality, common sense and the INEVITABLE ‘unfolding of events’ (8).

GEITHNER’S DECEITFUL DEMARCHE TO THE G-20
In parallel with this campaign, Mr Geithner surfaced in The Financial Times house organ on the 3rd September with a thinly-disguised plea for the colossal stash of illicit off-balance sheet funds to be plonked onto the books – thereby of course supposedly perpetuating the old Fraudulent Finance vortex to the satisfaction of George H. W. D. V. D. Bush Sr. In other words, this Geithner was STILL promoting the decapitated US Fraudulent Finance agenda – in the teeth of the opposition from the European Commission and the British Monarchical Power.

The essence of this deceitful operation fronted by Geithner was selling the G-20 the illusion that the US authorities are masters of regulation, when in fact the whole purpose of their rearguard campaign was to kill stone dead the necessary reform which cannot be stopped – namely that ALL transactions are to take place ON the books, consigning all the accumulated fraudulent derivatives accruals held off-balance sheet to the numeral ZERO.

• That of course will permanently defang the criminal finance syndicate, while impoverishing the cabal which had been holding the world to ransom (to the extent that it is not already impoverished by virtue of the freezing of its corrupt accounts).

The deceitful Geithner agenda was revealed in the first of five priorities which he spelt out in his article for the house organ of the City of London and beyond:

• Geithner: ‘First, capital requirements for banks simply must be higher across the board. Bringing more capital into the banking system is vital’.
• Translation: For ‘bringing more capital into the banking system’, read: Tipping off-balance sheet funds onto the books (while paying lip-service to Basel-II etc: see below).

• ‘Geithner: ‘Second, the regulatory framework also should put a greater emphasis on higher-quality forms of capital that best enable financial groups to absorb losses. Consistent with this principle, during good economic times, common equity should constitute a large majority of a bank’s Tier 1 capital’. • Translation: ‘Derivatives ‘assets’ are ‘a higher form of capital’.

• Geithner: ‘Third, capital requirements and accounting rules should be more forward-looking and should reduce the system’s pro-cyclicality. The capital régime should require banks to hold a larger buffer over their minimum capital requirements during good times, to be available in bad times’.
• Translation: ‘We don’t want real regulations which will constrain our permissive money-making behaviour. What we want is regulations made of India rubber which ‘go with the flow’ and that we can abuse and circumnavigate to suit our requirements’.

• Geithner: ‘Fourth, banks should be subject to explicit liquidity standards designed to improve their resilience in the face of runs by creditors and prevent the build-up of liquidity risk in the financial system as a whole’.
• Translation: ‘I am parodying Basel-II in order to bamboozle the G-20 into accepting my permissive agenda, without them realising what I’m up to’.

• Geithner: ‘Finally, we need to improve the rules used to measure risks embedded in the banks’ portfolios and the capital required to protect against them, and put greater constraints on banks’ use of leverage to dampen volatility’.
• Translation: Sounds nice, but see his fourth ‘point’ above: I am parodying Basel-II in order to bamboozle the G-20 into accepting my permissive agenda, without them realising what I’m up to.

• Geithner [final paragraph in his Financial Times (house organ) article]:
‘Strengthening capital requirements is an essential part of a broader effort to modernize [sic!] our regulatory framework so that the financial system is strong enough to withstand the failure of large complex institutions. That is the most effective way to prevent the world from re-living the events of last autumn [unspoken: which I personally, while I was President of the FRBNY, did so much to facilitate]. And that is the challenge we must tackle in London, Pittsburgh and beyond [unspoken: Pay attention to what I am saying, G-20].
• Translation: ‘Part of a broader effort to MODERNIZE’ = ‘to DUMB DOWN, so that we can wantonly infiltrate the off-balance sheet derivatives accruals onto the banks’ balance sheets under cover of the permissive regulatory régime intended by Paulson, myself and Bernanke, in the service of the criminal finance syndicate which we serve.

• In other words, we are in charge, and we reject the Basel disciplines while paying lip-service to them for public consumption and in order to hoodwink you G-20 attendees’ (9).

Geithner evidently thinks that he can outsmart the international community and the G-20 by sticking the Basel words back to them – using Basel-type language deceitfully in order to convey, with the naïve assistance of The Financial Times, an impression of wholesome regulatory rectitude – while in fact meaning the opposite. We and others, including the President of the European Central Bank, see right through this dialectic, as do the Chinese authorities.

• So it will ‘go nowhere’ – for this reason alone.

THE U.S. TREASURY SECRETARY IS WHISTLING IN THE WIND
The Geithner deception campaign is being waged in parallel with the overdue and drastic steps that will be taken, effective 16th September 2009, outlined above, by the Chinese authorities. This illustrates the fact that the US Treasury Secretary, who, with Dr Bernanke, was willfully BLOCKING the Settlement payouts which, by definition, will liquefy the banks (to the extent that payout monies have not been stolen), is whistling in the wind.

How does he expect his decadent formula to fly, in the face of the Chinese determination that it shall not fly, and in the face of the 100% transparent, fully taxable, on-the-books Dollar Refunding programme to be operated from London?

SWISS PRIVATE BANK TELLS CLIENTS TO SELL ALL U.S. ASSETS
On a separate note, but by way of illustrating how strands of ‘globalism’ are unravelling, Bloomberg reported on 2nd September that one of Switzerland’s oldest banks, Wegelin & Co., has told wealthy clients to sell their US assets, or remove their funds from the bank. The bank’s Managing Partner, Konrad Hummler, explained that US proposals to extend reporting requirements for banks with clients who acquire US stocks and bonds, together with estate tax liabilities that may be inherited by heirs of people with such holdings, had prompted the decision.

“We came to the conclusion that it’s a threat to our clients”, Herr Hummler, who is also President of the Swiss Private Bankers’ Association, said in the course of an interview during a conference in Zürich. ‘It’s also a threat to us as a bank because as a custodian we are an executor to the estate. We find this aspect discomforting, so we recommend selling all American securities whatsoever”.

Herr Hummler added that he intended to raise the issue on 4th September at a meeting of the Private Bankers’ Association, members of which include Pictet & Cie., Lombard Odier & Cie., and Mirabaud & Cie. After initial reservations, they were considering following suit.

• The report originally intended for publication on 2nd September 2009 starts here:

CIA NEVER MAKES MISTAKES, SO HOW CAN IT LEARN FROM THEM?
At the VIP showing of ‘Four Presidents and a Funeral’ held at the Boston Catholic Basilica of Our Lady of Perpetual Help [sic], CIA-‘President’ Barack Hussein Obama spoke about ‘learning from our mistakes and growing from our failures’.

However since the CIA never makes mistakes, it is hardly in any position to learn from them. But given that certain of those present were Grand Masters of manipulative cynicism, it is not out of place here to consider what the ‘President’ may actually have meant by these ‘inspirational’ words.

One definite possibility is that he was speaking in code to ‘the interested’ seated hypocritically en masse in the Basilica, signalling to those with ears to hear that the highest-level current and former operatives have ‘learned’ from the catastrophic mess they have made of the finances of the United States, the world, and their own pockets, by stumbling upon a new ‘wheeze’ to make money for themselves: hence ‘growing from our failures’.

PRESIDENTS 42 AND 43 FLY TO TORONTO AFTER THE FUNERAL
Let us explain. On the self-same day of the funeral, former President William Jefferson-Clinton AND former President George W. Bush flew at once to Toronto. The Toronto Star plastered a picture of Mr Clinton duly lecturing an audience of Canadian fans on ‘Embracing our Common Humanity’ – a dangerous title, one would have thought, for Clinton to employ, given that he used to embrace a Canadian MP of Austrian extraction during his frequent trysts in Canada of yore, a lady considered by some to be ‘common to humanity’.

But be that as it may, it stands to reason that Messrs Clinton and Bush Jr. rushed up to Canada for reasons OTHER THAN Clinton’s eagerness to enlighten a collection of extremely naïve Canadians – some of whom, according to The Toronto Star [31st August 2009] declared 42 to be ‘a marvellous fellow’, a ‘wonderful man’ and ‘an icon’, thereby lending new meaning to the phrase ‘Oval Office carpet’. The reasons for the Two Criminal Presidents’ haste to visit Toronto, are examined below.

THE REASON BUSH SR. DIDN’T APPEAR IN THE BASILICA
But first, we need to reconsider the ‘Four Presidents and a Funeral’ scene. They turned out to be NOT the Four Criminal Presidents who had DEMANDED and obtained their immunities on Thursday 22nd August 2009, as previously reported, but rather the Four Criminal Presidents MINUS George H. W. D. V. D. Godfather Bush Sr. – the stand-in being the ever-sunny and likeable President Jimmy Carter, who attended with his wife, the Steel Magnolia. So why, obviously, was the Godfather of all Godfathers missing from this happy gathering?

Why, none other than because George Bush Sr. had attempted to intervene with the settlements process that had in fact started on Thursday 27th August, continuing into Saturday, the day of the funeral. He is likely to have paid dearly for this last throw of the dice.

NO SPLIT: JUST A NEW CORRUPTION ‘OPPORTUNITY’
Bush Sr.’s absence from the funeral Mass gave rise to speculation on our part as to whether the Three Remaining Criminal Presidents had split from Godfather Bush – a proposition given some apparent weight by the nonchalant and goofily relaxed demeanour of former President George Bush Jr. at the Mass – to which the answer is ‘not really’.

On the contrary, Mr Bush Jr. was happy inter alia because he was about to fly to Canada with his criminal predecessor to clinch a deal which these operatives vainly hoped will float them out of the quagmire they’re in, characterised by the lugubrious fact that most of their accounts are frozen.

Before we visit Canada ourselves, though, a word about the World Court’s earlier behaviour. It proved impossible for us to obtain reliable indications as to whether suggestions that the Four Criminal Presidents’ craved immunities had in fact been revoked just as quickly as they were so scandalously granted. Given that Clinton 42 and Bush 43 surfaced in Toronto immediately after the funeral gathering, the balance of probability might have seemed to be that those reports were false or mistaken – although in view of the Canadian behaviour exposed immediately below, the Toronto authorities may have waived aside any such little local difficulties.

SCANDALOUS SITUATION AT THE WORLD COURT
There is also a peculiar, and quite scandalous, state of affairs within the World Court itself, which apparently enables individual Judges to annul what other World Court Judges have approved. The President of the World Court these days is Hisashi Owada (Japan), while the Vice-President of the Court is Peter Tomka (Slovakia). The Judges are: Shi Jiuyong (China); Mr Abdul G. Koroma (Sierra Leone); Awn Shawkat Al-Khasawneh (Jordan); Thomas Buergenthal (United States); Bruno Simma (Germany); Ronny Abraham (France: sic!); Kenneth Keith (New Zealand); Bernardo Sepúlveda-Amor (Mexico); Mohamed Bennouna (Morocco); Leonid Skotnikov (The Russian Federation); António A. Cançado Trinidade (Brazil); Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf (Somalia); and Christopher Greenwood (United Kingdom). The Registrar is Philippe Couvreur (Belgium).

With the likely exception of the Chinese and the New Zealand Judges, the ONLY World Court Judge who might be suspected of being liable to act honourably, would be Christopher Greenwood, the British Representative. And IF it is the case that a given World Court Judge can annul what other Judges or the Court itself have decided in the context of immunities, it stands to reason that one would expect this Thomas Buergenthal character have stood ready at all times to sabotage the decisions of other Judges, the World Court itself, or all of the above. No wonder the reputation of this globalist institution, which provides scant information concerning its operations, has sunk into the gutter along with those of the Four Criminal Presidents and the United States itself. [Note: the figure four in this context will be seen to require adjustment – up to the figure five].

Anyway, the complacent nonchalance and demeanour of former US Presidents 42 and 43 as they sat through CIA-President Obama’s eulogy for the deceased Edward Kennedy (‘one musn’t speak ill of the dead’, as one VIP noisily pointed out later), will have been enhanced by any stray thoughts they may have entertained during those proceedings concerning the infinite malleability of the Court.

Granted, the Four Criminal Presidents naïvely considered that they DEFINITELY NEEDED their immunities, otherwise they wouldn’t have DEMANDED them back on 22nd August, as we reported. At the same time, given the composition of this discredited globalist institution, the Two Criminal Presidents must have obtained some satisfaction from their knowledge that they can, if necessary, access the bank account coordinates of certain of these World Court Judges; and in any case, a clandestine promise of ‘compensation’ will have surely been all that was ‘necessary’.

Manifestly, if the foregoing analysis is inaccurate in any way, shape or form, the World Court can correct any inadvertent errors of analysis on our part at any time.

CANADA SUDDENLY POSTS US$-DENOMINATED BOND SALE
On 31st August, Bloomberg reported that Canada is planning a bond sale denominated not in Canadian dollars but in US dollars – the first such offering for more than a decade – and that the launch ‘may take place in the “near future”’. Canada does not in fact need to offer such bonds to the market, as its finances across the board are in a commendably healthy state; and we suspect that the entire operation will be ‘pulled’ given the ‘unfolding of events’ and this exposure.

But the Canadian Finance Minister, Jim Flaherty, announced the sale on Friday 28th August in a surreptitious manner on the Department’s website, without indicating the volume of such bonds to be sold. According to the website posting, the purpose of the bond is to strengthen the Canadian reserves of foreign exchange and to support lending by the International Monetary Fund. Mr Eric Lascelles, the Chief Economist with TD Securities Inc., Toronto, suggested that Canada’s supply of foreign currency-denominated bonds ‘has generally declined rather sharply over the years…. This is just an opportunity to reverse that trend’.

But it isn’t ‘an opportunity’ at all: it’s a wheeze suddenly posted without warning on the Finance Ministry’s website. Why?

Step forward (metaphorically speaking) William Jefferson Rockefeller-Clinton and George W. Bush Jr., world-class Financial Fraudsters and Experts in Stealing Other People’s Money whose swollen bank accounts have been extensively frozen.

If enough Canadian officials have been bribed, or rather, promised their cut from the intended high-yield, medium-term Canadian notes denominated in US dollar currency and therefore redeemable clandestinely via the Federal Reserve [see below], and given that the Criminal Presidents can only now deal ON the books, why, the answer to their ‘prayers’ will surely be a luscious new portfolio of foreign bonds issued in American currency. Except that this won’t happen!

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES TO KINDLY OBLIGE, AS WELL
And ever so helpfully, just to ‘make a market’, it is reported to us that the United Arab Emirates is now proposing to issue US dollar-denominated bonds, as well. Specifically, the state-controlled Emirates NBD PJSC, the biggest UAE bank by assets, is seeking, Bloomberg also reported on 1st September, to raise more than $500 million in US currency this year by selling medium-term notes with a typical maturity of between three and five years.

In fairness it should be added that Sanjay Uppal, the Chief Financial Officer with the UAE bank, also told Bloomberg that ‘honestly speaking we could go through this year with very little issuance’ on the assumption of a reduction in general nervousness in the financial markets – famous last words, since we are now in the eye of the biggest financial storm in history, courtesy of the Four Criminal Presidents, two of whom flew with indecent haste to Toronto on Saturday 29th August after leaving the Boston Catholic Basilica.

While accordingly hoping to line their own pockets thanks to the ‘good’ and probably corrupt offices of Canadian ‘facilitators’ (the fact that Clinton and G. Bush Jr. arrived in Toronto over a weekend is neither here nor there: that’s when deals are struck at this level of corruption), the Two Corrupt Presidents will also have been keenly aware of the extreme urgency of the situation (so far as their own pockets and persons are concerned). Because, without such a concept to cling to (and it may be aborted following this posting, as has occurred in the past), their already debilitated financial futures would surely be looking as severely constrained as their physical prospects.

For one thing, they wouldn’t be in any position to compete with the London-based on-the-books, fully transparent and taxable Dollar Refunding operation, of which they are insanely jealous and which all concerned in their circles have vainly attempted to thwart.

NEW YORK FED HAS A $500 TRILLION ‘BLACK HOLE’
But secondly, even more to the point, the entire Derivatives Hydrogen Bomb may be about to explode. Specifically:

• The Federal Reserve Bank of New York, primary seat of this Fraudulent Finance, is reported to us to have a BLACK HOLE of $500 TRILLION in off-balance sheet holdings that are not covered by any collateral or assets whatsoever.

This state of affairs arose partly under the stewardship (not) of Timothy Geithner, the current US Treasury Secretary, who uses barracks language when haranguing distinguished female heads of critical financial sector agencies, as previously reported. One can perhaps more easily understand why this man loses his cool: he will be taken down when this collapse ‘blows’.

• It was against this background that Reuters reported from Peking on 31st August that Chinese State-owned corporations will be allowed by the Chinese authorities to ‘walk away’ from any loss-making commodity derivative trades [see above].

Specifically, the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, which is the regulator and nominal shareholder for the Chinese State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), was reported to have informed six foreign banks that the SOEs now reserve the (sovereign) right to default on derivatives contracts. The report was derived from an unnamed Chinese official source cited by Caijing magazine in an article published on 29th August.

MORE BELATED CHINESE MEASURES AGAINST FRAUDULENT FINANCE
The report was qualified by Reuters’ assertions that official confirmation could not be obtained, but a banking source told the news agency that ‘a handful of the State-Owned Enterprises… are being encouraged by regulators to renegotiate. It’s outrageous, but it’s China, so everyone is treading very carefully’ – but not with sufficient care to prevent this report reverberating around the world, as all talk of recovery was suddenly swamped by well-founded gloom on 1st September, when the stock market reflected the mood immediately.

Air China, China Eastern and COSCO (shipping), having incurred colossal derivatives losses since 2008, were reported to have issued almost identical notices to banks.

• SASAC became responsible for overseeing the derivatives trading activities of SOEs from the local securities regulator in February 2009, after several Chinese firms had reported immense losses from playing around with derivatives.

This is the corollary to the new ‘Master Agreement’ régime referenced above, to be introduced by the Chinese authorities effective 16th September.

The Chinese authorities have been seeking since February 2009 to prevent the sale of foreign derivatives ‘products’ to Chinese firms by foreign banks, after certain large Chinese enterprises bought so-called ‘protection’ contracts against higher prices, when of course the derivatives sector imploded following the events of 10th-12th September 2008.

• In July, SASAC ordered all those Central Government-controlled State corporations still unwisely engaged in trading derivatives to file quarterly reports concerning their investments, including, the Reuters report added, details of their holdings and performance.

ORIGINAL THEFT OF DELMARVA TIMBER TRUST ASSETS
The gargantuan BLACK HOLE within the Federal Reserve Bank of New York is a direct and specific consequence of the criminal hypothecation of derivatives based on assets belonging to Delmarva Timber Trust which were stolen by CIA criminal finance operatives under the Clinton Administration with the full knowledge and encouragement of the White House.

• These Delmarva Timber Trust assets, including assets held in Bank Rafidain sub-accounts, were held in London and kept thus as a safekeeping measure to keep the assets away from the clutches of Godfather George H. W. Bush Sr., Rockefeller-Clinton and Leo Wanta.

•THIS is what Paulson, Geithner and Bernanke are COVERING UP.

The accumulation of such a colossal portfolio of dud derivatives assets, arising originally from this CIA-controlled THEFT, and the running of these dollar transactions via the New York Fed, has led directly to the biggest financial crisis in world history – a state of affairs which is exacerbated, ‘as we speak’, by the following further scandalous abomination:

DESPITE THIS CRISIS, BERNANKE WAS BLOCKING THE PAYOUTS
For the past three weeks plus, UP TO OUR CUT-OFF TIME, the Settlements payouts in the United States were BLOCKED, as reported above, by Dr Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, working with the desperate US Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner.

In other words, the CRISIS THAT WAS PRIMED TO BLOW UP was being deliberately triggered and exacerbated by the head of the US Central Bank himself, in order to assist Geithner and Paulson to continue obfuscating the existence of this $500 trillion ‘BLACK HOLE’.

Which, of course, also explains why CIA-‘President’ Obama (10), holidaying on Martha’s vineyard in readiness for the expected ‘Four Presidents and a Funeral’ event, very suddenly interrupted his vacation – having (to our own professional knowledge) previously told the pressmen and women accompanying him, to ‘chill out because there won’t be any news this week’ – and took time out on 25th August to propose that Dr Bernanke should serve a second four-year term as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board.

This announcement could perfectly well have been made later, after Obama’s return to Washington, and in any case was issued way in advance of ‘normal practice’.

CIA-PRESIDENT OBAMA IN SECRET CAHOOTS WITH BERNANKE
What this told us was that, since we know that Bernanke was BLOCKING the payouts, ‘President’ Obama, who was repeatedly reported to us by usually reliable US sources to be ‘anxious for this matter to be finalised once and for all’, was playing a double game – since he had so prematurely reappointed the US central banking official whom he knew to be blocking, and whom he had very probably ‘instructed’ to block, the Settlements payouts in the United States.

• Hence CIA-‘President’ Barack Obama is or has been a co-conspirator with Godfather George H.W. D.V.D. BushSr, Clinton 42, Bush Jr. 43, Hillary Clinton, et al. in holding the whole world to ransom.

POOR BERNANKE A VICTIM OF IDENTITY FRAUD
In a revealing side-show, Agence France-Presse and Newsweek reported on 26th August that poor Federal Reserve Board Chairman Dr Ben Bernanke was one of hundreds of victims of an identity fraud ring that stole over $2.1 million from individuals and financial institutions. Court documents had revealed that a thief stole Dr Bernanke’s wife’s purse in August 2008 and had begun cashing cheques on the Bernanke family’s bank account.

The reports stated that the theft of Dr Bernanke’s cheque book became part of an ongoing, wide-ranging identity-theft investigation mounted by the US Secret Service and the United States Postal Inspection Service, and that the probe led to arrests, criminal complaints and indictments brought by Federal prosecutors in the United States Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria – the famous court which was the scene of the events of 19th October 2007 reported by this service and attended by the Editor.

The Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board permitted himself the privilege of being interviewed by Newsweek, saying that ‘identity theft is a crime that affects millions of Americans every year’.

‘Our family was but one of 500 separate instances traced to one crime ring. I am grateful for the law enforcement officers who patiently and diligently work to solve and prevent these financial crimes’.

Inevitably, the Editor’s sensitive nature compels him to commiserate with Dr and Mrs Bernanke. What a trial this experience must have been for them, poor things.

FED IS (WAS) NO-GO AREA FOR U.S. LAW ENFORCEMENT CADRES
Since, however, the Federal Reserve and the Federal Reserve Interbank Settlement Fund are no-go areas for the law enforcement officers of which Dr Bernanke is so touchingly proud – given that no checks and balances apply in that arena – we can be certain that the Chairman of the US Federal Reserve Board loses no sleep at night, after stroking his beard, over the financial devastation that he inflicts upon the payees of the Settlements monies, including the 330,000 victims of the ruthless Ponzi schemes perpetrated by the crumbling edifice of endless financial corruption constructed by Godfather Bush and his chief technician, Bernanke’s predecessor, Dr Alan Greenspan.

The fact that NONE of the criminals who thought they would be paid, will be receiving a single red cent, according to our latest authoritative information, does not in the slightest compensate for the scandalous fact that the Chairman of the US Federal Reserve Board was himself willfully continuing to block legitimate payouts in collaboration with the US Treasury Secretary.

BARNEY FRANK BELATEDLY CALLS FOR THE FED TO BE AUDITED
Significantly, but far too late to save the situation, Representative Barney Frank has joined Rep. Ron Paul in calling for a comprehensive audit of the Federal Reserve Board – in the context of Bloomberg’s case against the Fed which resulted in a Court victory for the publisher, and that Dr Ben Bernanke, of course, is resisting.

• An audit, which will need to include the Federal Reserve Interbank Settlement Fund. will put an end to the corrupt practices at the Federal Reserve once and for all: so ‘Gatekeeper’ Bernanke’s job is to prevent that happening, while illegally blocking the Settlements payouts at the same time

‘EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION’ OF TOP CRIMINALS REQUIRED
The British Monarchical Power, wielding the Writ of Execution, should instruct the ‘enforcers’ to procure the ‘extraordinary rendition’ of these highest-ranking US financial criminals, including Dr Bernanke himself, to a jurisdiction where the handcuffs that need to be applied to them are not subsequently ordered to be removed by World Court Judge Thomas Buergenthal.

• The report originally intended for posting on 2nd September ends here.

LIBYAN CONTROVERSY IS A U.S. FALSE FLAG OPERATION
The row over the release from Scottish incarceration of the Libyan prisoner (note that we do not describe him as ‘bomber) has been misrepresented on both sides of the Atlantic. In Britain, the ‘mainstream’ media has focused on the ‘humanitarian’ dimension, which has been escalated to ‘pinpoint’ the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, as duplicitous in ‘doing this deal’ behind the backs of ‘our friends the Americans’. In the United States, outlets such as The New York Daily News have all enjoyed themselves throwing bad eggs at the British – with that newspaper declaring on 2nd September that the ‘Special Relationship’ is ‘gone’, under the headline: ‘Brown the Betrayer’.

The yellow New York paper waffled: ‘As for the ‘Special Relationship’ between the US and Britain, the storied alliance built on the resolve of World War II and carried on through Thatcher and Blair, through Iraq and Afghanistan: it is, in a word, gone’.

Now this service has argued that the ‘Special Relationship’ is shattered and should be wound up, but NOT for the spurious reasons put forward by US outlets. On the contrary, our ‘line’ is that we have been deceived and abused for so long by the United States, which has traditionally treated the United Kingdom with cynical disdain, that there is no point in continuing this pretence until such time as the Americans ‘clean up their corrupt act’.

However whereas WE have sound reasons for this argument, the barrage of hatred pouring forth from the United States following the release of the Libyan intelligence operative is based upon the very kind of duplicitous behaviour of which WE complain, and of which the US outlets themselves are complaining in the context of the release of Abdel-baset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi from jail in Scotland (11) in a disgusting ourbreak of ‘Black-calling the Kettle Pot-ism’.

DAVID RIFKIN, A U.S. SCUMBAG, LECTURES US ON THE BBC
In this connection, one of the more loathsome US operatives who stuck his oar in, appearing on the air to castigate the British over this affair, was David Rifkin, a former US Justice Department official who ‘served’ under Reagan and George W. Bush. This impertinent US operative surfaced on the BBC’s ‘World at One’ radio programme on 2nd September to inform us as follows:

‘This is the kind of duplicitous behaviour that most people here do not expect from Britain. I really can’t think about a more duplicitous act by Britain vis-à-vis the United States in the postwar period’.

Note that Mr David Rifkin stated that such behaviour was not to be expected from Great Britain – whereas (unstated) it is standard behaviour from the United States, given the hegemony of the criminalised Intelligence Power, as Mr Rifkin knows perfectly well. While his wife served on the Federal Reserve Board, David Rifkin, described to us by US sources as ‘a scumbag’, exploited his wife’s position by engaging in all sorts of off-balance sheet deals in which he should not have been engaged. He is a spokesman for the de facto Financial Terrorist group within the structures, a fact of which the naïve ‘World at One’ BBC presenters would have been wholly ignorant. Lectures from this US scumbag are accordingly themselves doubly duplicitous and therefore contemptible.

THE CHENEY OIL OPERATION IN LIBYA
Two especially notorious US intelligence operatives named Christiansen and Brock, in partnership with the criminal operative Richard B. Cheney, did a clandestine deal with the terrorist Government of Colonel Qadhafi, and developed a Libyan oilfield. After President R. Reagan’s bombing of Libya (using British airfields without our permission for the purpose, of course), these nasty operatives returned to Libya, where they resumed operations.

Given that British Petroleum (BP) has its largest operation in Libya, this contrived furore over the ‘Lockerbie bomber’ clearly has NOTHING to do with the sensitivities of the bereaved families, or concerning where al-Meghrahi was to die, about which these hardened criminals couldn’t care less – and everything to do with a carefully pre-planned ‘Blowback’ operation designed to discredit the British Government by exploiting the fissiparous inclinations of the Scottish Nationalist minority government in Edinburgh, consequent upon the following development.

BRITISH SIMPLY TOOK A LEAF OUT OF THE U.S. BOOK
It is perfectly clear that the British took a leaf out of the US Intelligence Power’s ‘grabitisation’ book. What happened, in essence, was that a very long-range British intelligence operation was developed for the purpose of ‘locking’ the ‘Lockerbie’ scandal into place in the British national interest (even though supposedly no European Union country has any national interests as they have largely been collectivised under the European Union arrangements: this example shows how false that ‘settlement’ is in practice).

Participants in this operation included the ‘cream’ of British ‘hard men’, all of whom could easily give their odious American intelligence rivals a run for their money. These figures included Sir John Bond, Chairman of HSBC; Lord Foster, the ‘international’ British architect; Lord Guthrie, the former head of the British military; Lord Bell, the Lady Thatcher’s original PR man, now a publicity tycoon; Prime Minister Tony Blair; Lord Browne, ex-Chief Executive Office, British Petroleum; Lord (Jacob) Rothschild; Jacob’s son, Nathaniel Rothschild; Peter Munk, a billionaire operative; Peter Mandelson, the high-ranking Business Secretary ‘handler’ of Gordon Brown; and, on the Libyan side, Colonel Muammar Qadhafi and his son, Saif al-Islam Qadhafi, whom the Rothschilds have carefully cultivated and befriended over a long period.

CHENEY TRYING TO DESTROY U.S.-UK COOPERATION
The correct way to look at the Libyan sequence, therefore, is to recognise that the contrived row over the ‘Special Relationship’ reflects a US Blowback operation orchestrated by a highest-level US criminal intelligence agent called Richard B. Cheney. Furthermore, this operation fits perfectly with the ongoing deception activities of the US Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner, a scoundrel whose days in power (we predict) may be numbered by the ‘unfolding of events’, who is focused on replacing European representation on the Board of the over-compliant, US-controlled International Monetary Fund by procuring a reduction of seats on the Board from 24 to 20 by 2012, with the large developing countries that already have chairs retaining them. The object of this exercise is to kick the British (and possibly the French) off the Board, so that it can then be packed with more corrupt Directors from emerging countries upon whose support the desperate, corrupt elements headed by Geithner within the US Treasury depend for re-starting the collapsed derivatives trading sector.

THE UNANSWERED AFGHANISTAN QUESTION GETS NASTIER
The refusal of the British Ministry of Defence to answer the Editor’s question ‘what are we doing in Afghanistan’ – with its repeated corollary that in the absence of any coherent official answer, the Editor would have to advise readers that Great Britain is supporting a subversive US operation to acquire control over the heroin trade – is now destabilising the British Government itself.

Specifically, Eric Joyce MP, a former British Army Major and the Parliamentary Private Secretary to the Defence Secretary, Mr Robert Ainsworth, resigned on 3rd September, presenting the UK Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, with a sharp rebuff for the Government’s failure to explain to the British people why our troops are being killed in large numbers in an Afghanistan war the true rationale of which has never been explained to the British people.

This MP for Falkirk West stated pointedly in his resignation letter: “I do not think the [British] public will accept for much longer that our losses can be justified simply by referring to the risk of greater terrorism”. Dismissing this outburst as the opinion of ‘a junior parliamentary aide’, the previously almost unheard-of Mr Ainsworth failed to answer our question, or any one else’s – leaving the issue up in the air, and therefore ripe for further elaboration by this service.

To begin with, unconfirmed reports from within British military circles suggest that, despite early indications that British troops are soon to be withdrawn from Afghanistan (believed to arise due to the ‘unfolding of events’), contingency plans ALSO exist for as many as 32,000 British troops (thirty-two thousand) to be deployed there. This madness is accompanied by Mr Joyce’s further comment in his resignation letter to the following effect: ‘Britain fights; Germany pays; France calculates; and Italy avoids’, in the Afghan context. More to the point, Germany has a military force of 340,000 under arms, with a further 50,000 armed reservists, 1,000 tanks in pristine condition ready to roll and, according to information ‘special’ to this service, surreptitious nuclear weapons.

• By contrast, the British military is bleeding to death, resources are being poured down the ghastly Afghan drain to support the corrupt American grab of the heroin trade, and our aircraft carrier projects have been indefinitely postponed or cancelled in part because the UK military’s resources and services are being deliberately diverted and abused.

And why are they abused? Let’s get to the nub of this issue:

• Britain’s military forces, the best in the world, have been subverted. Specifically, they are not deployed in the national interest (given that European Union ‘Member States’ have no national interest since they have mostly been collectivised, unless we are talking about Germany and France in which case collectivisation is for the rest of the EU and not for them).

• On the contrary, our military is routinely deployed in the ‘international interest’, namely in support of an internationalist agenda, which in reality means the agenda of the criminalist internationalists.

• This reality CANNOT BE EXPLAINED TO THE BRITISH PEOPLE because they don’t know about this subversive agenda (although a huge percentage almost certainly suspects it), and because they overwhelmingly support the continued unity and sovereignty of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

• Therefore, the UK Ministry of Defence is, in collaboration with the UK Government as a whole, engaged in a gross deception of the British people – one consequence of which includes the fact that hundreds of our finest young men are being slaughtered in a war which, contrary to vague official assurances, does not serve British interests at all.

• In fact the reverse is the case: precisely because the Ministry of Defence provides its military resources in support of internationalist (i.e. FOREIGN) interests, which they are precluded from revealing because they cannot divulge the truth to the British people, the MOD is actually engaged not only in deceiving and defrauding the British population, but in renting out its military power to the enemies of the United Kingdom.

The sooner such straightforward, basic truths start to sink into the thick skulls of brainwashed UK apparatchiks, policymakers, the political Establishment and officialdom, the better.

INSPIRING EXAMPLE SET BY THE MAYOR OF DONCASTER
They could do well to consider the behaviour of a newly elected Mayor of Doncaster, a northern British town. Announcing that he considers that his task is to reduce the costs of bureaucracy and thus the burden on the people he was elected to serve, this man has indicated that he will use his newly conferred popular power as follows:

• His first action was to reduce his own salary from £75,000 to £30,000, saving taxpayers £45,000.

• He immediately reduced the huge number of Council members to a dozen, saving the city an estimated £800,000 per annum.

• He has already blocked the funding of a ‘gay pride march’.

• He will block the funding of all superfluous and subversive ‘Common-Purpose’-influenced activities which have nothing to do with the purposes of municipal government.

• He has informed all holders of ‘non-jobs’ within the municipal bureaucracy that they had better start looking for a real job outside local government, because their non-jobs will be terminated.

• On the basis of the immediate savings he has ordered, he has announced that the Council Tax bills for local people will be reduced initially by 3%.

• He has reiterated that he was elected to serve the people of Doncaster, that he places their interests above all others, and that he will oppose, refuse and terminate all activities and expenses which contravene that purpose.

BRITISH MINISTRY OF DEFENCE IS BETRAYING THE PEOPLE
The British Ministry of Defence has sold its soul to corrupt interests which contravene those of the British people. It should come clean with the people, starting with Afghanistan. If It can’t persuade its brainwashed Government bosses to come to their senses, it should take matters into its own hands and issue a ‘Mission Statement’ indicating that it serves the interests of the British people exclusively and that it will ensure in the future that this objective is rigidly adhered to.

Of course this isn’t going to happen, is it. Well, they said that before we started this operation to eliminate the scourge of the criminalist financiers and of their Fraudulent Finance.

A GLIMPSE OF REVOLUTIONARY REALITY IN THE BURMA CONTEXT
Referencing our previous coverage of the ‘rescue’ of an American from Burma (a.k.a. Myanmar) by Senator Jim Webb, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, we have been informed that the rescuee was seen making a satanic salute during his transfer from Burma in the sequence described, to the United States.

This reinforces our perception that Burma is intended to be ‘unlocked’, no doubt as the Afghan situation goes from bad to worse, in the interests of the drug operations conducted by the CIA and the corrupt US military which, like the Agency, is engaged in drug-trafficking.

The ‘Burma Play’ has next to NOTHING to do with ‘establishing democracy’ and with the fate of the Burmese ‘democracy icon’, Aung San Suu Kyi – but EVERYTHING to do with validating an option to ‘unlock’ Burma in the interests of (drug-trafficking) strategy. No doubt Webb, described as ‘a gruff Vietnam veteran’, is himself a ‘Useful Idiot’ who may not understand what he is doing.

In all likelihood, the American ‘rescued’ by Senator Webb was a CIA operative or agent fulfilling instructions to prepare the ground for this ‘Burma Play’ operation, which would explain his satanic salute. In case this mystifies some people, it is a characteristic of these Workers of Darkness that they cannot contain within themselves what they are up to, often resorting to gestures – like the satanic salutes perpetrated by former President Bush Jr., and Laura Bush at the 2004 Inaugural Ball, or the same gestures by many other key operatives, including the Iranian President Ahmad Inejad (Mr Dinner Jacket) – to release their tensions.

• We liken such behaviour to the spooky gargoyles stuck up on European masonic cathedrals, many of which stick their tongues out at passers-by below.

BUSH PUSHED WAY BEYOND CO-CONSPIRATORS’ TOLERANCE
In taking stock of the ongoing and immediate ‘unfolding of events’, we may observe as follows:

• The head of the serpent, George H. W. D. V. D. Bush Sr., being of dual German and US nationality and of Germanic extraction, has, as we predicted, exhibited the cardinal weakness of all German schemers and conspirators. He has simply pushed matters so far beyond the toleration snapping-point even of his own most obliging criminalist associates in the trading, financial, official and organised crime sectors at home and abroad, that he has destroyed and forfeited their bought and blackmailed ‘loyalty’ to him and everything he stands for.

Hitler made the same mistake: he went too far and lost his essential support and underpinning, as a result. This is in fact a standard German trait, born of pride and arrogance, and one which profilers, had any with integrity existed within the structures, could have identified as soon as the scales ever started to fall from their eyes as a consequence of these exposures.

• ‘All things considered’, we should actually ‘be grateful for’ the fact that this serpent has shown himself to be true to this fateful weakness. The reason for this is as follows. By pushing bovine intransigence to such extremes, thereby alienating not only the corrupt collaborators at home and abroad without whose cooperation his criminal cartel operation cannot function, but everyone else who matters as well, he has unwittingly ensured that the FINAL OUTCOME will be seen to be MORE SATISFACTORY than would have been the case if some kind of sordid, dirty compromise had been agreed earlier in the process (which was actually impossible: see below).

• BECAUSE: The serpent’s intransigence has made it inevitable that the entire global portfolio of fraudulent off-balance sheet derivative ‘assets’ would indeed be shown and finally recognised to be worth ZERO – and that this evolved outcome would, by process of the disgust and exhaustion attributable exclusively to this serpent’s obtuse misplaced cunning and stupidity in spinning his resistance out for so long, come (much faster than anyone may have anticipated) to be accepted without question everywhere. Had some kind of compromise been reached with the weaker and now decapitated cabal and its criminalised intelligence sector hangers-on earlier, such a decisive outcome would not have been possible, and the world would have limped towards an even ghastlier catastrophe, if that can be imagined.

• Therefore, hideous, exhausting, infuriating, maddening, destructive and destabilising although this horrible experience has been for ALL concerned, that is the prohibitive price that has been and is being paid for REAL reform and fumigation.

• We expect the pace of arrests, indictments, imprisonments and ‘other measures’ to accelerate as the resistance crumbles with the COLLAPSE of the crime syndicate and its associates – beginning in the United States and spreading rapidly throughout the world.

SATAN WAS NOT CALLED THE SERPENT FOR NOTHING
In this connection, the being to which we are introduced at the beginning of Genesis, after Adam and Eve, is the underworld creature called THE SERPENT. The choice of this metaphor to signify TOTAL EVIL, was NOT ACCIDENTAL. Think about it. What does a serpent DO? It slithers around. Can it move in a straight line? Can it be relied upon for any purpose? The answer is NO.

The reason that this financial crisis may now at last be on the verge of resolution (on the basis of intelligence to hand, and assuming no or few further serpentine slithers) is that all who have stood up to and resisted the wiles of the serpent are CRUSHING THE SERPENT’S HEAD. Once the head of the serpent has been bruised, as the Bible puts it, the serpent cannot slither any longer.

What has the Bush-Clinton-CIA-DVD criminal syndicate been doing in response to the repeated initiatives taken against it by those who have finally resolved to fight for the restoration of the Rule of Law (leaving aside the reality that the corrupted US legal system needs to be purged as a matter of urgency, as well)?

Every time some kind of ‘accord’ or undertaking has been reached, the serpent has predictably reneged on its undertakings – that is to say, the snake has slithered back into the undergrowth.

• Irrespective of the details of each successive phase, this is the essence of what has been happening. The serpent has repeatedly slithered into the undergrowth instead of fulfilling its promises, which have invariably turned out to be worthless.

We have, in fact, been living through an enactment of what we are taught at the beginning of the book of Genesis, BUT WHICH MOST OF US NEVER UNDERSTOOD. We have witnessed THE ESSENCE OF EVIL, and how it operates. Those who have tried to reach accommodations with the serpent and his sub-serpents, have been deceived on every occasion.

THE SERPENT IS A DISCIPLE OF LENIN [or rather, vice versa]
Well, of course. One cannot ever reach accommodation with a serpent. It was ‘not by accident’ that Lenin, one of the 20th century’s most conspicuous incarnations of the serpent, taught his followers that ALL agreements made with ‘the bourgeoisie’ can be reneged upon whenever ‘the correlation of forces’ favours ‘the Revolution’ (which itself means ‘slithering round and round in circles’). The US revolutionary criminals at the highest level operate on precisely the same criteria: as the Editor of Soviet Analyst, this Editor can state with authority that we have observed the criminal operatives at the highest levels of the US official structures following Leninist methodology, including dialectical behaviour, TO THE LETTER.

These American and collaborating foreign operative-office-holders are disciples of Lenin. At the relevant levels, covert and overt Soviet (‘International Socialist’) and German (‘National Socialist’) long-range intelligence structures work closely together, as has been the case since long before the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. The collapse of that accord made no difference over the longer term, (and even among Hitler’s own Nazi intelligentsia, at the time): because it represented just another dialectical ‘switch’ – yet another ‘bait and switch’ operation.

TAKEN BY SURPRISE, THE SERPENT COULDN’T ORGANISE ITS OWN DEFENCE
So: we have been wrestling with the serpent and observing closely how he operates.

• Furthermore, in bruising the serpent’s head, all of us who have stood up against this ruthless and relentless evil, have demonstrated the indisputable fact that when faced with real opposition, the snakes were so taken by surprise that they couldn’t organise any defence.

• They slithered into the undergrowth instead.

Belatedly, they have, it is true, orchestrated ‘stings’ and scamming operations against some of us (including a CIA operation to proliferate the theft of the rights and copyright in our books to try to entice us into financially destructive litigation, which will be exposed in detail soon); but because they were so staggered that there was any opposition at all, they were taken by surprise and failed to organise in retaliation. They have been kept on the wrong foot ever since.

NO ‘GUTS’ ARE NEEDED! JUST DO IT!!
It may be recalled that a commentator, Mark Huber, reported as follows on another website, on 12th June 2008, concerning some of these exposures:

“Chris Story’s facts are understated. This is much bigger than he knows or is willing to state… so far. He is the only investigator who has had the guts to print the results of his research. It is causing unbelievable turmoil in criminal, financial and political circles, long accustomed to conducting their nefarious actions beneath the radar of the public, and honest media”.

But actually NO GUTS ARE REALLY NEEDED. The secret is: JUST DO IT!!! When you have ‘done it’ they are ALREADY on the back foot. Just as the blackmailer is actually in a weaker position than the blackmailee (who can defang the blackmailer permanently by allowing the blackmailer’s report to be acknowledged), so are these snakes PERMANENTLY disadvantaged when their criminal behaviour has been, and continues to be exposed. THEY CANNOT RECOVER FROM GENUINE EXPOSURE!

Think about it. If the allegations are true, they can’t deny them. When we have stated that Citibank is a criminal enterprise, nothing happens. Why is that? BECAUSE IT’S TRUE. And any perusal of the cases involving money center banks in the United States Court for the Southern District of New York, in Downtown Manhattan, for instance, will reveal that innumerable other colossal institutions which we could name, are criminal enterprises, as well.

WHEN WE STAND UP TO THEM, THEY ‘FALL BACK TO THE GROUND’
From which it may be deduced that when we stand up to these criminals, they are so staggered that ANYONE has had the effrontery to DARE to contradict them, which has never taken place before, that they become mired in confusion. This confusion becomes all the more agonising and acute for them because the serpent’s arrogance, given that he has perpetrated these huge crimes without opposition for so long, has blinded him and his fellow demons to the reality that the opposition is no flash in the pan, but is – let’s boldly acknowledge the fact – supported and ordained by the Divine Providence. The credit belongs NOT to any one of us, but exclusively to The Lord.

• In this context, if you search the scriptures, you will find that the demons are NOT atheists. They KNOW about the Lord, and are TERRIFIED (12).

Those who cannot bring themselves to believe this, or to believe at all, would nevertheless do well to contemplate, in this context, the following verses from the Gospel of John that we have often highlighted before:

‘Jesus therefore, knowing all things that should come upon him, went forth, and said unto them, Whom seek ye?’

‘They answered him, Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus saith unto them, I am he. And Judas also, which betrayed him, stood with them’.

“As soon then as he had said unto them, I am he, they went backward, and fell to the ground’. [John, Chapter 18, verses 4-6].

He withstood them, and they went backwards, and fell to the ground. That is what happens when we resolutely, and with steely determination, and knowing by Whom we are supported, stand up to the serpent and his disciples.

Notes and References:

1. ‘Bravo to Christopher Story. His answer is so appropriate and eloquent. This shows once again, what a “class act” this talented man is! In such a critical time, it is without question appropriate to use best judgment and to act as prudently as possible. Waiting a few extra days is not going to be the end of the world. Some people lose perspective of the enormous scope of what’s coming’.

In the event, as indicated in the main text, we have been specifically informed that the two main consequences associated with our delay in publishing that are noted, arose because, after turning down the extraordinary 2% (or 2.5%) cut offer (as described later in this report), Bush’s duplicity was FINALLY comprehended by certain cadres who ought to have known much better years earlier.

2. Uttering threats is a Federal offence no matter how the threat is uttered; but in the present context it is understood that Bush Sr. has been uttering threats of physical retribution over the phone. [In a much earlier commentary, we may have suggested that the utterance of threats, which is a criminal offence in the United Kingdom, may not have the same ‘standing’ in the United States. We elaborated this in the context of the numerous threats received by the Editor of this service (now up to 28, by the way, of which six have been explicit death threats, and excluding the ‘Triple Gunshot Voicemail’ episode that followed the ‘lockdown’ of the $14+ trillion achieved on 10-12th September 2008 as a direct consequence of our intervention).

• We stand corrected and now confirm what we should have known earlier, that the utterance of threats in the United States is a Federal offence.

3. Email received by the Editor from a high-level payee at 6:01pm on Thursday 3rd September 2009.

4. The Wall Street Journal, 3 September 2009, International Finance section, page C2, ‘Foreign banks caught in a bind’, report from Shanghai by Denis McMahon.

5. “Europe has mapped its monetary exit’, Jean-Claude Trichet, President, European Central Bank, the Financial Times, London, 3rd September 2009.,

6. ‘Derivatives users warn on OTC regulation’, The Financial Times, 2 September 2009.

7. The Daily Telegraph, Business section, 4th September 2009, page 1, ‘Moulton quits Alchemy over strategy’. The insider added: ‘Many of Alchemy’s investors have been with Jon [Moulton] for a long time. He has made them a lot of money and they put their money to work based on him’.

• These savvy investors, noting that one of the very top UK hedge fund operators is getting out of the business NOW, will most certainly take the hint and grasp the opportunity (IF IT STILL REMAINS) presented by the associated variation of the ‘key man’ clause, to remove their funds from Alchemy before it collapses. This is proxy for the ENTIRE derivatives sector, as it unwinds, because off-balance sheet funds WILL be worth zero, whatever Geithner, the industry lobbying organisations and the Financial Times may propagandise to the contrary. Money is being rapidly removed from these entities whenever possible.

8. It was Lenin who used the phrase ‘the unfolding of events’ to describe or hint at a cascading sequence of developments destined to swamp and smother all attempts to resist it. As noted elsewhere in this report (and also earlier), US holders of high office and routine CIA behaviour demonstrate by their slimy words and unreliable undertakings that they are de facto disciples of Lenin – in many respects, more skilled and devious than their Soviet counterparts.

9. ‘Financial stability depends on more capital’, by Timothy Geithner, US Treasury Secretary (for the time being), The Financial Times, 3 September 2009.

10. Concerning CIA-‘President’ Obama, we have been remiss of late in failing to post a reminder that on 14th June 2008, the well-regarded News Host Tim Russert died suddenly of a ‘heart attack’ aged 58, almost immediately after concluding an interview with Barack Hussein Obama. It will be recalled that the Bush Godfather appeared at the funeral.

11. The matter of the involvement of the Scottish Nationalist minority Government is a separate issue here, and is excluded from this analysis. However the incident has unveiled the fact that this Scottish devolved government, established under Blair’s devolution project in 1999, is behaving as though Scotland is a sovereign power in its own right – pursuing ‘trade’ agreements with countries such as Qatar, representing itself in Brussels, and otherwise conducting itself in precise conformity with one of Lenin’s more obscure dicta: ‘separation precedes federation’ (although the Scottish nationalists will have a problem with the ‘federation’ bit.

[This subject requires a separate presentation].

12. ‘Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe and tremble’, James (the brother of Jesus), Chapter 2, verse 19.

• COPYRIGHT NOTICE: The Editor and his companies have taken measures to obtain protection and recompense for the gross breaches of the copyright material, books and works owned by this service, our companies, the Editor and Author, and the Authors whose interests we must protect. In the first place, a pirate platform service in the United States has received a demand for a very large sum of money to compensate us for the wanton stealing of three of our books, the consequence of which barbaric acts has been effectively to destroy our book publishing business. Secondly, the agents for the Google Settlement have been specifically informed by registered mail that we have written, also by registered mail, to the four universities and one public library who have entered into an agreement with Google under the so-called ‘Google Settlement’.

The universities in question are: Oxford, Stanford, Harvard and Michigan; and the public library is the New York Public Library. Our three companies have opted out of the Google Settlement, which is anyway now in some disarray.

These and related parties have been advised that if ANY of our works, published by all three of our companies, not just the intelligence books company which has already been severely ransacked, are assaulted by copyright pirates, we will take all legal measures open to us to enforce our rights and those of our authors. The rationale underlying this scourge is the false and spurious one that the intellectual property of the whole of humanity is the property of the ‘global commons’: a dirty, revolutionary piece of hypocrisy and subversion, the underlying purpose of which is to destroy small publishers so that there will be no dissenting voices to The New Underworld Order.

When time permits, we will be providing ‘further and better particulars’ concerning this outrageous revolutionary development. In the meantime, those amoral persons and parties who have so far downloaded our works are hereby warned that every single download will be traced, and that they risk being pursued for very large damages for gross and insolent breaches of our copyright.

Anyone wishing to reproduce the important anti-World Revolution article posted here must contact the Editor for written permission, on the understanding that a precise form of words that we will specify must accompany any reposting and that the entire article, with credits, must be displayed. Any deviation will be treated as a breach of copyright and dealt with accordingly [see above].

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

THE HEADING FOR THIS REPORT IS CENSORED BY THE NSA

chrisstory

THE LIES HAVE DECAYED AND THE PERPETRATORS ARE IN A PANIC

Friday 17 July 2009 07:00

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

CALLING EVIL GOOD, AND GOOD EVIL
‘Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!’

‘Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!’
Isaiah, Chapter 5, verses 20-21.

‘NONE OF THIS MUST EVER COME OUT’
‘None of this must ever come out, you understand’.
Well, it has.
Gwendolyn Waymark, a Bush Sr. operative, in a voicemail to the Editor in May 2003

• NOTICE TO AMERICANS FACING FORECLOSURE ON THEIR PROPERTIES:
READ THIS AFTER YOU HAVE READ OUR REPORT [ARCHIVE] DATED 26TH DECEMBER 2007.
This development proves the accuracy of the advice given in that report, namely: THE ORIGINAL MORTGAGE DOCUMENTS MUST BE PROVIDED, OR FORECLOSURE CAN BE NIXED BY THE COURTS, AND THERE IS NOTHING THE BANK CAN DO ABOUT IT:

http://foreclosuredefensenationwide.com/?p=144
NEW JERSEY COURT DISMISSES FORECLOSURE FILED BY DEUTSCHE BANK FOR FAILURE
TO PROVIDE DISCOVERY AS TO OWNER AND HOLDER OF NOTE, SECURITIZED TRUST
DOCUMENTS, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS DEMANDED BY BORROWERS

• SUNDAY, 19TH JULY UPDATE: IMPORTANT:
First, about the ‘real bullets will fly’ deadline, which is today, 19th July. This information came from CMKX ‘victims’. However AFTER the information was posted, the Editor was informed by two other sources that this deadline emanates from a very senior level of a certain structure which we can’t go into. It is very serious. There have been discussions for the past 24 hours in the undergrowth as to where this will start: ‘At the top, surely’. NO! Apparently it is to be comprehensive.

Now bear in mind that this kind of thing has been said before. But the situation is beyond critical. In the Second World War, the British finally woke up to the fact that there was a problem after the roof had fallen in and the walls were collapsing on the occupants of the dwelling.

But these criminal forces are different. The roof has caved in because the house is on fire and all the windows have been blown out: AND THEY ARE CARRYING ON SCAMMING REGARDLESS.

According to our information, THE STATES HAVE NOT BEEN PAID BECAUSE THE STIMULUS MONEY HAS NOT BEEN PAID BECAUSE THE SETTLEMENTS HAVE BEEN BLOCKED BY THESE MANIACS, who are intent upon protecting their own positions and, as has been the case all along, couldn’t care less about ordinary American employees and their families.

Employees of certain States, get this, are going to work on the basis of an undertaking that they will be paid. WHAT DOES THIS REMIND YOU OF? Answer: The constant ying-yang ‘promises’ and broken promises and raised and lowered expectations which the 320,000 (390,000) ransacked, scammed and pillaged Ponzi ‘Program’ victims have suffered over the years.

• Only NOW, they are doing it to simple, straightforward, American workers and State employees. They expect these people, who have mortgages to pay, to go to work on a promise?

What is this, a deliberate attempt to trigger blood in the streets?

Our answer to that is: NO! These people are terrified of the likes of US: everyone who is standing up (including especially YOU, reader) against these criminals. It is TRUE that they are more scared of the likes of US than ‘we’ are of them. They are cornered. They have no idea what to do.

ROGUES’ GALLERY WARNING FLUSHES OUT A DECEIVING TRUSTEE
Here’s another interesting development. As you may have noticed, we have published a ROGUES’ GALLERY warning, the point being that we will expose every single deceiving, conniving piece of work who has deceived us since we started reporting on these matters.

About three years ago, a Trustee started sending the Editor almost daily emails, giving ‘informed’ information about pending settlement arrangements. A ‘High Functionary’ had told him this, his associate in Europe was promising that, he was all set to go into the bank, he’d heard nothing all day, last week was a washout, but he understood that payment will be made this week, and so on and so forth. All this claptrap was rounded off with ‘God Bless’, because their profile of the Editor is someone who reads Scripture, and they think that Christians are thoroughly wet and easily conned.

Well, guess what? Since we posted the ROGUES’ GALLERY WARNING, this false (and of course ANONYMOUS) correspondent has VANISHED INTO THIN AIR. Doesn’t want to be exposed, you see. Trouble, is, we know who he is, where he is, who he works for, and that he and other snakes have been creaming funds off the top of trades for the uber-gangsters ALL THE WAY THROUGH.

It’s all blowing ‘as we speak’. This will become clear for all to see. It’s taken a long time, but the only way forward is for the entire edifice of corruption to be torn down. And that’s what will happen.

One other point: May we remind you that this is an INTERNATIONAL CRISIS, not simply an American crisis. Therefore, this is not a matter of national security: it’s a matter of global public interest, and these investigations are the legitimate focus of attention for an international financial journal. Our job is to provide our subscribers with ‘value-added’ financial intelligence. That’s what we try to do.

• PLEASE ALSO READ THIS IMPORTANT NOTICE BEFORE YOU GO ANY FURTHER:

The main heading of this report was intended to be:
9/11 MASS MURDER BY THREE CRIMINAL U.S. PRESIDENTS

• But it is blocked by the intrusive NSA censors. The entire report could not be posted with this heading. But when we amended the heading to read: THE HEADING FOR THIS REPORT IS CENSORED BY THE NSA… as above… we were able to post it.

• THIS, everyone, provides the whole world with a potent indication that ‘9/11 MASS MURDER BY THREE CRIMINAL U.S. PRESIDENTS’ is the APPROPRIATE heading for this report, and that the statement it contains is TRUE [as is revealed in the text below].

• PAYEE LIST REDEFINED TO INCLUDE NEUTRAL LINE ITEM PAYMENT: SEE BELOW

• THE VREELAND INFORMATION IN THIS REPORT IS UPDATED: HE’LL BE RELEASED IN 2124.

• ‘REAL BULLETS START FLYING AFTER 19TH JULY’: CMKX:
The Editor was advised at 2.15pm UK time on 18th July that CMKX people have a deadline of 19th July (Sunday) for ‘satisfaction’, after which quote ‘real bullets will start flying’ unquote. The bullets in question will, we presume, not be fired by enforcement team operatives on the ground who are still, as far as we are aware, engaged in enforcing the World Court-issued Writ of Execution, but by other parties with an interest in the ‘rectification of past wrongs’. Certainly, one has the impression, too, that the giga-criminal operatives know that the game is up, and may be engaged in ransacking the accounts (or trying to), including reverting to their stealing from the Social Security Trust Fund accounts, which they were doing at least two years ago.

A FOREIGN RANSACKING OPERATION AGAINST THE UNITED STATES?
One of their problems is that they have to ‘replace’ what they have stolen from the Government’s accounts, and they can’t, because they are being forced by the pressure of the exposures to pay out the Settlements, according to our ‘special’ information.

Obviously, the Bush-DVD Criminal Syndicate hasn’t just raped US investors alone: it has certainly ransacked the Federal Government’s accounts, as well. Such pillaging would be consistent with a foreign-controlled revenge operation, and the primary suspects would be Germany and the covert Soviet Union. And that might well help to explain why the STASI/DVD operative, Chancellor Angela Merkel, is currently painting herself ‘whiter than white’, demanding that Wall Street and the City of London are put in their place, while also conveniently papering over the uncomfortable reality, for public consumption purposes, that Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank are George H. W. Bush Sr.’s Fraudulent Finance hidey-holes, too (and that she, this ‘financial reformer’ is or has long been the recipient of Bush Sr.’s bribes, as previously reported).

• INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW: Volume 34, Numbers 3 & 4: Comprehensive coverage of the twists and turns of this crisis between September 2008 and June 2009, containing details of many of the astonishing goings-on in the lawless space called the intergovernmental sector.

• In this ‘Black’ arena, ‘anything goes’, assets of other parties are stolen and traded, deception is standard practice, and everyone lies to everyone else. This huge issue, currently ‘on machine’,
provides a devastating record and critique of the deplorable behaviour of the Big Powers, as they fight over stolen money. Please apply via the CONTACT US facility for availability and price details.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice are comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor’s study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing global financial corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Just press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

• The Editor’s $35,000 Wanta bail-out money has been stolen.

• See the second white panel for details of our latest distributed intelligence publications.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

• COPYRIGHT NOTICE: The Editor and his companies have taken measures to obtain protection and recompense for the gross breaches of copyright material, books and works owned by this service, our companies, the Editor and Author, and the Authors whose interests we must protect. In the first place, a pirate platform service in the United States has received a demand for a very large sum of money to compensate us for the wanton stealing of three of our books, the consequence of which barbaric acts has been effectively to destroy our book publishing business. Secondly, the agents for the Google Settlement have been specifically informed by registered mail that we have written, also by registered mail, to the four universities and one public library who have entered into an agreement with Google under the so-called ‘Google Settlement’.

The universities in question are: Oxford, Stanford, Harvard and Michigan; and the public library is the New York Public Library. Our three companies have opted out of the Google Settlement, which is anyway now in some disarray.

These and related parties have been advised that if ANY of our works, published by all three of our companies, not just the intelligence books company which has already been severely ransacked, are assaulted by copyright pirates, we will take all legal measures open to us to enforce our rights and those of our authors. The rationale underlying this scourge is the false and spurious one that the intellectual property of the whole of humanity is the property of the ‘global commons’: a dirty, revolutionary piece of hypocrisy and subversion, the underlying purpose of which is to destroy small publishers so that there will be no dissenting voices to The New Underworld Order.

When time permits, we will be providing ‘further and better particulars’ concerning this outrageous revolutionary development. In the meantime, those amoral persons and parties who have so far downloaded our works are hereby warned that every single download will be traced, and that they risk being pursued for very large damages for gross and insolent breaches of our copyright.

Anyone wishing to reproduce the important anti-World Revolution article posted here must contact the Editor for written permission, on the understanding that a precise form of words that we will specify must accompany any reposting and that the entire article, with credits, must be displayed. Any deviation will be treated as a breach of copyright and dealt with accordingly [see above].

• ROGUE’S GALLERY OF DECEIVERS: Given the deceit and abuse that has been meted out to the Editor of this service since we began these investigations in 2002, the Editor plans to expose, by name, each of the primary perpetrators of deception against us, including a UK-based deceiver recently unmasked who sought to extort money for delivering sensitive packages that he never delivered. This character has been reported to the Police, and a Major Crime Book Number will be sought with a request for an investigation. The relevant documents have been sent by registered and signed-for mail, to the Special Branch officer concerned. Those who have deceived us will be made to endure the grave consequences of their serial duplicity, starting with Leo Wanta, to whom the Editor lent $35,000 to pay for his release from irregular probation, which should have been paid back on 11th June 2007 but concerning which nothing has been heard. All other collaborators and operatives who tried to deceive us at various stages will also be exposed for their deception.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and our ‘politically incorrect’ intelligence books online from this website.

• NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

• THE STENCH OF ROTTING HUMAN FLESH IN MIDTOWN MANHATTAN

• THE INITIAL WANTA CAMPAIGN USING THE EDITOR’S PLATFORM

• DEEP LIES DISLODGED BY THE CAMPAIGN

• PAULSON SEIZES CONTROL OF THE ‘WANTA FUNDS’

• THE METHODOLOGY OF WADING THROUGH A DECEPTION MINEFIELD

• WANTA: ‘YOU ARE AN HONEST JOURNALIST, WHICH IS EXTREMELY RARE’

• ‘WALKING IN A STRAIGHT LINE’

• THE EDITOR ACCUMULATES A LARGE FILE OF DOCUMENTS

• THE ‘LINE’ THAT THE WANTA ACCOUNTS HELD SOVIET SPOIL

• REALITY: WANTA AS BUSH’S DE FACTO (DOUBLE-CROSSED) ‘BAGMAN’

• MARC RICH (HANS BRAND) AND GWENDOLYN WAYMARK

• THE EDITOR’S LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY

• WANTA SUDDENLY TRAVELS TO CALIFORNIA

• WANTA AND MADOFF: OUTLETS FOR BUSH CRIME SYNDICATE MONIES

• INFORMATION IN THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

• GOODWIN DID NOT FORWARD COURT DOCUMENTS TO WANTA

• BUSH SR. WAS ‘UPSTAIRS’: SO WANTA’S PARTY WERE KICKED OUT
OF CITIBANK’S MIDTOWN OFFICES BY ARMED NYPD AGENTS

• THE ‘FUNNY BUSINESS’ AT THE ALEXANDRIA COURTHOUSE

• HOW THE PETITION WAS EXPLOITED FOR DECEPTION PURPOSES

• AN ‘ANOMALY’ IN THE TEXT OF THE PETITION

• DECEPTION EXPERT DOUBLE-CROSSED BY DECEPTION EXPERTS

• MONEY STOLEN FROM PETER IN ORDER NOT TO PAY PAUL

• CORRUPT U.S. GOVERNMENT RAPES, MURDERS AND PILLAGES ITS OWN PEOPLE

• CURIOUS ’INTERCHANGEABILITY’ OF U.S. ‘INTELLIGENCE’ ACCOUNTS

• WANTA RELEASED FROM JAIL IMMEDIATELY AFTER 9/11

• JAILED TO PREVENT WANTA FROM LEAKING 9/11 PLOT IN ADVANCE

• OUR DEDUCTION ABOUT THE ACCOUNTS IS CONFIRMED

• PROOF THAT 9/11 WAS MASS MURDER BY THREE PRESIDENTS

• VREELAND DID PREDICT THE 9/11 ABOMINATIONS

• OUR WARNING ABORTED A NUCLEAR EXPLOSION

• PLANNING A NUKE EXPLOSION TO AVOID PAYING WANTA?

• TWIN CITIES PREDICTION JUDGED TO BE ACCURATE, TOO

• CHENEY AND STRUCTURES WORKING OVERTIME TO STOP ‘IT ALL COMING OUT’

• NEW COORDINATED 9/11 LEAKS BY ‘LICENSED’ U.S. AGENTS

• BITTER FEUDING OVER THE MONEY BY RIVAL INTEL FACTIONS

• WHOEVER WINS ELECTIONS, THE CIA/NSC ALWAYS WINS

• THE RULE OF LAW SOLUTION WILL PREVAIL: ‘SET IN STONE’

• DEVELOPING U.S. MILITARY CRISIS OVER OBAMA’S STATUS

• BANKS REFUSE TO HONOUR CALIFORNIA I.O.U.s

• THE GHANA EPISODE, PLUS: OBAMA ‘WANTS HIS CUT’

• WARRING INTEL GROUPS FURIOUS BUT IMPOTENT

• OUR THINKING ON DERIVATIVES GOES ‘MAINSTREAM’

• WARNING BY WORLD BANK’S CHIEF ECONOMIST

• GEITHNER’S ‘STANDARDISED CONTRACT’ RED HERRING

• REARGUARD OPERATION TO ‘RESCUE’ FRAUDULENT FINANCE

• DISLOCATIONS ARE DUE EXCLUSIVELY TO CORRUPTION AND FRAUD

• AUTOMATON WHITE HOUSE KEEPS ON ‘KICKING AGAINST THE PRICKS’

• PAYEE LIST REDEFINED TO INCLUDE A KEY ‘LINE ITEM PAYMENT’

• LAST-MINUTE SCAMMING OPERATIONS BY THE CROOKS

• EXCERPTS FROM A CRUCIAL AFFIDAVIT

• READ OUR SEPTEMBER 2006 PREDICTION OF THE PRESENT SITUATION IN NOTE (5) BELOW

• Relevant Notes containing extensive reference data:

(1) Extracts from a timeline analysis of the background to the Criminal Finance Crisis associated with the Editor’s personal involvement: Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 3 & 4, pages 3-25: July 2009.

(2) Banks identified by the Editor of this service from open domain documents that we retain, as holding ‘Wanta’ (‘Bush Crime Syndicate’) illicit funds (which, when ‘accepted’ by US authority, are ‘laundered via the sovereign’ and thereby legitimised).

(3) CIA proprietary US Government intelligence corporations, with which Leo Wanta was connected.

(5) Excerpts from our prediction of what would happen if the Refunding Programme (previously labelled by us ‘The Wanta Plan’) were not to be implemented expeditiously: published first on 2nd September 2006 and again on 3rd-4th December 2006 [see this website’s Archive for those dates]. Source: International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 1 & 2, pages 299-302 [Third Quarter 2007]. For this presentation, the phrase ‘The Wanta Plan’ (which, like ‘Wantagate’, we invented) is replaced by ‘The G-7-Approved Refunding Plan’.

THE STENCH OF ROTTING HUMAN FLESH IN MIDTOWN MANHATTAN
We are now approaching the eighth anniversary of the preplanned mass murder by three conniving Criminal Presidents of the United States and their lackeys of over 3,000 people in the Twin Towers on 11th September 2001. As has been stated in earlier reports, public lies are like plutonium: they have a half-life and in the experience of this Editor, the average lifespan of an official lie is about seven years. So one would expect the 9/11 lies to be shaky by now.

It is therefore no surprise that the lies surrounding 9/11 have decayed to the point when they are poised to blow the entire conspiracy into the air, with devastating consequences for all concerned, who thought they had ‘got away with it’.

When the Editor himself recovered from the shock (his youngest daughter narrowly missed being caught in the Twin Towers on the morning of this ‘Reichstag Fire’ abomination), he returned in late October 2001 to our Midtown Office, which was covered in a thin film of grey filth, and took hours to clean. The carpet in our small apartment was so filthy that it eventually had to be discarded. And the stench of rotting human flesh permeated the entire Midtown area permanently.

As a ‘visitor’, the Editor noticed the stench all the time, but he was also aware that New Yorkers appeared to have got used to it. When the Editor returned to New York City in February 2002, the stench of rotting human flesh was less evident, depending on the direction of the wind from the downtown area. There were days when it was unchanged from the situation prevailing in late October, and days when it was less or not noticeable.

In order not to hold up the following narrative, a basic timeline describing the background to the Editor’s involvement in these investigations is appended below as Note (1). This text, expanded, is to be published in Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 3 & 4, in production.

THE INITIAL WANTA CAMPAIGN USING THE EDITOR’S PLATFORM
It will be recalled that, having provided (as explained again in the timeline) $35,000 of our scarce private financing (obtained from the proceeds of a satisfactory private house sale) to pay for the shortening of Leo/Lee Wanta’s probation after his incarceration on what appeared to be trumped-up charges (like not paying $14,129 in Wisconsin State tax which we have proved from documents we hold and have published, that he paid twice over, in May and June 1992 – and which the Editor’s private funds paid a third time on 21st July 2005, with interest: see website report dated 6th August 2007 for comprehensive details), the Editor’s website and publishing platform became, with Leo Wanta’s enthusiastic agreement and on his instructions as confirmed by numerous faxed cover sheets addressed by Wanta to Prof. Christopher Story FRSA – USA Ops. sent to us with detailed information for publication on this website, the vehicle for a de facto exposure operation intended to procure the fulfilment of compensation arrangements for Wanta.

DEEP LIES DISLODGED BY THE CAMPAIGN
As this de facto campaign developed momentum, the rickety scaffolding propping up the inverted pyramid of official lies surrounding 9/11 and its underlying motivations, began to disintegrate.

The ‘Black’ inspirations for this long-planned (see below) abomination included covering up the stealing of unbelievably colossal sums of money and gold, the destruction of ‘Structured Products’ contracts, and providing the pretext to enable the Bush-CIA-DVD Financial Criminal Syndicate to attack Afghanistan for geo-energy reasons and to invade Iraq so that, to begin with, the Central Bank of Iraq, holding the counterparty assets, cash, gold, instruments, contracts and printing plates amassed by Bush Sr.’s former financial partner, Saddam Hussein, could be ransacked.

PAULSON SEIZES CONTROL OF THE ‘WANTA FUNDS’
What happened was that after Bush II had removed John Snow as Treasury Secretary and had replaced him with the criminal operative Henry M. Paulson Jr., the former Goldman Sachs CEO, the funds sent over by the People’s Bank of China (after having been released, we speculate, on the signature of Howie Kwong Kok, Wanta’s Chinese ‘partner’), ostensibly as Wanta’s ‘compensation’, were removed from the recipient institution, Bank of America, Richmond, VA, and, under Paulson’s sole signature, were lodged with Paulson’s ‘former’ institution, Goldman Sachs, placing them under contract for one year in June 2006, according to our best information and belief. This gave rise to our repeated description of Paulson as Henry M. ‘Conflict-of-Interest’ Paulson, a cognomen that understandably got up his nose, as was intended.

It will also be recalled that the CIA had lied for some years that Wanta was dead, just as they lied that Howie Kwong Kok had died from ingesting rat poison in Singapore, not long after a visit to Singapore by George H. W. Bush Sr., in 1993.

THE METHODOLOGY OF WADING THROUGH A DECEPTION MINEFIELD
Here we must interpolate an important consideration about our methodology. When investigating tangled webs of deception, the investigative journalist must be on guard at all times that he is not himself deceived, double-crossed, led up garden paths and otherwise subjected to the standard barrage of ‘Black’ tools deployed by the corrupted intelligence community, for which deception is standard procedure. Recall the classic observation of Gordon Thomas (with his MI6 and Mossad connections, about which he boasts) when the Editor tackled him in 2004-05 about the lies that he said MI6 had fed to the British press about the Editor of this service, in order to ensure that the gullible ‘mainstream’ wouldn’t take what they knew we were likely to publish (i.e. exposure of the colossal financial thefts), seriously:

‘It doesn’t matter that it’s not true. All that matters is that it’s out there’.

(In uttering this classic put-down, Gordon Thomas thereby destroyed the credibility of his entire life’s published works, including his history of Mossad: but that’s a diversion here).

WANTA: ‘YOU ARE AN HONEST JOURNALIST, WHICH IS EXTREMELY RARE’
Anyway, what we would like to insert at this point is the following clarification. In ‘assisting’ Wanta and exposing what we did between June 2006 and March 2008, the Editor and those associated with him walked in a straight line. By this we imply that any ‘honest journalist, which is extremely rare’, which was Wanta’s flattering description of this Editor, has to pursue leads which, ‘to the best of his knowledge and belief at the time’ are accurate; and as is well known, journalists are allowed some leeway, since the Fourth Estate (in our case the Fourth and the Fifth Estates) is required to do its job to hold the Executive and other branches of authority to account.

Therefore, bearing in mind this responsibility, and also the fact that one is on guard at all times against the likelihood of being deceived, one does one’s best to avoid falling into traps carefully set by devious, cynical, scheming ‘Black’ intelligence community operatives who care nothing for individuals, but only for whatever sordid agendas they happen to be juggling at given moment.

‘WALKING IN A STRAIGHT LINE’
Nevertheless, despite taking all possible precautions, one cannot be sure that one is not being lied to. The Editor knew that Wanta was a consummate deceiver, but used his discernment to identify what he thought was the genuine person behind the multiple complex tradecraft masks deception behaviour for which he was known. The Editor did not know that he had accepted funds from other parties and had never paid them back, just as he took our $35,000 on the basis of a two-year loan at 7.0%, repayable on 11th June 2007, and has not paid us a penny.

(Likewise he never paid Michael C. Cottrell anything after he had been forced to spend $14,000 on hotel accommodation etc during the 40 days during October and November 2007 when they were seeking settlement from the duplicitous Citibank in Midtown Manhattan).

If he had had any manners, Wanta, who typically answers the telephone in German (‘Guten Tag’) should at least have written to say that he was not in a position to pay the money back, but would do so when he could – which would have been an appropriate small gesture. Instead of which, he did nothing; while his Düsseldorf-born (CIA approved) lawyer, Steve Goodwin, of Richmond, VA, who drew up the loan documentation, should have taken appropriate action to address the situation.

• As he failed to do so, he is a co-conspirator in the stealing of the Editor’s funds plus interest.

Now as you will recall, after what Wanta described as a kangaroo court trial, Wanta was imprisoned for a prolonged period in 1995. He had fallen out with George Bush Sr., who falls out with everyone he deals with (‘bait and switch’): indeed double-cross is Bush Sr.’s standard modus operandi.

The falling-out with Bush Sr. centred around the colossal volume of offshore (Executive Order 12333) corporations and accounts containing vast sums of ‘Bush’ money handled.

THE EDITOR ACCUMULATES A LARGE FILE OF DOCUMENTS
Since, by 2006-07, the Editor had accumulated a very large portfolio of bank documents that had been leaked into the (obscure) public domain, inter alia by the subsequently incarcerated Office of Naval Intelligence Operative Delmart Mark Vreeland [see timeline in Note (1) below], he extracted details of these accounts from the documents in a systematic manner, and also compiled a list of the banks holding these accounts, which is re-appended as Note (2) below.

This list has been published both on this website and in International Currency Review, so it is on record all over the world, in places ‘where it matters’.

Readers are further reminded that, in the public interest, a colossal volume of documentary evidence of this systematic financial corruption involving the holders of the US highest offices, and others, has been published in successive issues of International Currency Review.

This means that Governments, Treasuries, international financial institutions, Central Banks, large financial institutions, intelligence agencies, military establishments and other interested parties all over the world have copies of these banking documents (a considerable proportion of which are reproduced in facsimile format, as well as being the subject of very extensive ongoing narrative commentaries) either sitting on bookshelves, accessible in their libraries, or otherwise held in archives. There is therefore no excuse whatsoever for the Governments and the central banks concerned – which we could name – disregarding the record which we have made available in the public interest, just as this report is proffered in the public interest.

THE ‘LINE’ THAT THE WANTA ACCOUNTS HELD SOVIET SPOIL
As the Editor and Publisher of Soviet Analyst, the Editor was a ready recipient of the ‘line’ that the colossal number of bank accounts ostensibly in Wanta’s corporate portfolio, and from which he was separated when he was arrested in Lausanne on 7th June 1993, represented accounts which held inter alia, if not mainly, the proceeds of the Financial Warfare operations that had reportedly been masterminded by Howie Kwong Kok and Wanta on the instructions of President Ronald Reagan as set out in three specific Executive Orders requiring the ‘Evil Empire’ to be brought to an end. As Wanta put it to the Editor once, Reagan ‘thought the stand-off with the Soviet Union was pointless’ and should be terminated.

REALITY: WANTA AS BUSH’S DE FACTO (DOUBLE-CROSSED) ‘BAGMAN’
But in the light of greater knowledge, deeper understanding and hard experience, the Editor reached the conclusion some time ago that the story about these offshore corporate accounts having been established to hold the proceeds of the ransacking of the Soviet Union, is false, or rather ‘economical with the truth’. It is another deception, and Wanta is party to that deception.

On the contrary, the bank accounts which we publicised in detail, giving the identities of the banks used for the purpose, represented a considerable proportion of the offshore bank accounts used by George Bush inter alia to hide the proceeds of the Bush-CIA-DVD Crime Syndicate’s massive assault on the funds of others – a theft-fest concerning which Bush Sr. uttered the notorious comment: ‘If the American people knew what we had done, they’d string us up on lamp posts’.

Well, the American people today, who are among the most intelligent on earth (as they received the best brains from Europe and elsewhere) are pretty sure what these unspeakable US criminals have done, but have not yet found a way to ensure that the criminal gangs that have been controlling the United States at the very highest levels for the past several ‘Black’ Presidencies receive the overdue decisive punishments that they deserve and that are pending. We doubt whether the dam will hold much longer, as the half-life of the supporting lies has decayed beyond their ‘expiry dates’.

MARC RICH (HANS BRAND) AND GWENDOLYN WAYMARK
Most public and intelligence sector lies contain elements of truth: so to say that the bank accounts did not include the proceeds of the wholesale ransacking of the Soviet State economy would be completely untrue, especially given the known involvement of Zug, Switzerland-based intermediary Marc Rich, exposed by this service as the long-range German DVD operative Hans Brand [refer to International Currency Review, Volume 31, Numbers 3 & 4, pages 83-96, with facsimile documents (Fourth Quarter 2006)]: indeed we have ourselves deconstructed a number of such bank account transactions, having for instance identified the Bush operative Gwendolyn Ann Waymark as named beneficiary of a Pay Order fee instruction by a Mr Paul M. Bauer arising from currency exchange of 18.699 billion Soviet Roubles, of $4,721,969.70, for account of Gwendolyn Ann Waymark and Diane M. Waymark with Bank of Massachusetts, East Long Meadow Branch, associated with the forged Status-Credit-Bank, Moscow, documents referencing the Executive Order 12333 corporation Asian Europe Development Pte. Ltd., sent to us unsolicted by Fedex on 10th September 2007. We were able to compare these documents with Status-Credit-Bank documents that we hold on file, proving the US forgery and thefts. In the same batch, Daniel Reis was to receive a commission from the stolen Russian monies, of $20,237,012.99 [see International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 3 & 4, pages 288-294 (Second Quarter 2008)], with facsimiles that prove out this forensic research.

However it is now clear that Leo Wanta was for a time a or THE guardian of ‘Bush Sr.’s accounts’, meaning offshore accounts holding stashes of stolen monies which Bush Sr. claimed belonged to him: which specifically explains why we have repeatedly heard, from the underground, that ‘Bush Sr. says the money is his’.

THE EDITOR’S LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY
These, then, are the funds which Wanta stated he was engaged in repatriating, having instructed Steve Goodwin to prepare a Power of Attorney (which the Editor had requested to be restricted specifically to information gathering) enabling the Editor, with Goodwin, to appear at Coutts Bank in April 1986 to conduct certain investigations on behalf of Wanta; and to enable the Editor to attend, which he did, at Lloyds Bank TSB, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire in late April 2006 – when he was told by the bank manager that the accounts held there in the names of specific Executive Order 12333 corporations listed on the Power of Attorney had been shifted into the PERSONAL name of Jan Morton Heger, one of Wanta’s CIA Attorneys.

WANTA SUDDENLY TRAVELS TO CALIFORNIA
Following these developments, Wanta, who was now able to travel outside Wisconsin thanks to the Editor’s funds having been applied to pay for his ‘restitution’ (and the third illegal payment of the $14,129 plus interest) so that Wanta’s probation was shortened by five years and two weeks as a consequence – suddenly disappeared out to California where he was prevailed upon to accept the ‘compromise’ ostensible remuneration package which was later associated with the visit to Beijing of Bush Sr.’s chief criminal financier, Dr Alan Greenspan, and the subsequently ousted US Treasury Secretary, John Snow.

It is believed that the California visit was specifically precipitated by the aborted investigations at Coutts, London, and Lloyds Bank which Wanta instructed the Editor of this service to pursue, as well as being driven by a conference call to Coutts Bank from Goodwin’s office in Richmond, VA, in March 2006, which instead of being taken by Mrs Burgess whom the Editor knew, was taken by a Mr Robertson, who said that Coutts had no banking relationship with Leo Wanta.

No. They had a banking relationship with George H. W. Bush Sr.

WANTA AND MADOFF: OUTLETS FOR BUSH CRIME SYNDICATE MONIES
The Bush Crime Syndicate, of course, had multiple outlets for the stealing, placement, distribution, and laundering of the vast flow of hijacked funds that it handled, of which the Madoff enterprise was one – a point that needs to be borne in mind, so that the moribund Wanta situation is seen in its proper perspective. On 9th July 2009, it was reported that Irving Picard, the Trustee appointed by the Manhattan Court to take charge of identifying assets to compensate the victims, had stated that his investigations had ‘unearthed a labyrinth of interrelated international funds, institutions and entities of almost unparalleled complexity and breadth’.

Specifically, Mr Picard revealed that stolen assets had been identified in Britain, Ireland, France, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Spain, Gibraltar, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands and the Bahamas. Mr Picard has despatched more than 230 subpoenas seeking overseas records and has received more than 15,400 claims against Madoff and his defunct Ponzi network. As in the case of the ‘Wanta’ accounts, the funds that Mr Picard is chasing are in fact ‘Bush Crime Syndicate’ funds, as Madoff was used as a key conduit for the dispersion of stolen funds (in accordance with the classic Ponzi model).

INFORMATION IN THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Wanta’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia [Civil Action No.: 1 – 07 CV 609] faxed to the Editor on 22nd June 2007 at 06:04pm UK time, and which was published in facsimile format in International Currency Review Volume 33, Numbers 3 & 4, pages 67-79 [Second Quarter 2008] states inter alia:

13: In May of 2006 the People’s Republic of China caused a free and unrestricted transfer of $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars through international bank fund transfer facilities to an account at Bank of America located at Richmond, Virginia. The designated beneficiary of the transferred funds from the People’s Republic of China was Petitioner herein [Wanta – Ed]. This transfer was made by the People’s Republic of China solely and exclusively as a requirement under the mentioned settlement agreement.

14: Upon best information and belief between the dates of July 31st to August 2nd of 2006 the United States Department of the Treasury, without authorization of either the remitting party or the receiving party removed the People’s Republic of China transferred financial assets from Bank of America, Richmond, Virginia, to an account in the name of Goldman Sachs at CITIBank New York, New York, as the beneficiary holder of the monies transferred by the People’s Republic of China referenced above. This “Chip” (Clearing House Interbank Payment) transfer was facilitated from Virginia domiciled banks to New York domiciled banks via the Federal Reserve Bank Richmond*].

[This was INCORRECT. The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond at once made it clear that they had nothing to do with it and that Wanta should file suit in the Southern District of New York, meaning that the funds were transferred from Virginia via the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, of which Timothy Geithner was the President. Therefore, self-evidently, Mr Geithner has always been fully cognisant of this dimension of the scandal, which means that Geithner is deeply compromised].

The Chip transfer did not remove the name of [the] Petitioner as the intended recipient of the transferred money from the People’s Republic of China. The transfer to the Goldman Sachs et al. account at CITIBank put a lawless restriction that the funds were not to be released to Petitioner without the authorization of [the] United States Treasury. At or about the time of [the] unauthorized transfer mentioned in this paragraph 14 Petitioner protested the alleged right of “entitlement” by Secretary Paulson, and to facilitate protest or right of ownership under the [US] “Securities Acts” accounts were opened in the name of AmeriTrust Groupe at Morgan Stanley, fiduciary account at CITIBank/NYC to receive direct deposit transfer of Petitioner funds from Goldman Sachs’.

[Note: These accounts were opened on the basis of the securities market qualifications of Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., who was then still serving as the Treasurer and Executive Vice President of Wanta’s Commonwealth of Virginia-based corporation. Mr Wanta had neither the securities market qualifications nor the legal status to open any accounts, let alone a securities market account – as he remained a felon (a state of affairs that the Editor attempted to alleviate by sending a Misprision of Felony letter on 17th October 2007 to Wisconsin State Judge James Martin, drawing the Judge’s attention again to the gross irregularities perpetrated by the Wisconsin Department of Corrections summarised in our website report dated 6th August 2007, and suggesting that the State Court might consider removing Leo Wanta’s felonious status as he had 100% fulfilled the Court’s ‘restitution’ requirements (using the Editor’s funds, now stolen [see website Archive report dated 27th October 2007]. This was the Editor’s final attempt to help Wanta over his Wisconsin probation issues).

[Wanta later claimed that he would operate with bank accounts only and erroneously stated that Mr Cottrell had required his corporation to operate a securities market account in order for Michael Cottrell be able to control Wanta’s affairs – whereas the reason for the securities account was to protect assets, since funds held in corrupted US banks are liable to be stolen, whereas clients’ assets held in US securities market accounts do not form part of the assets of the broker/dealer institution, and so are much safer in this free-for-all US financial environment].

The Petition for a Writ of Mandamus continued:

15: The Petitioner has been contacted by “Compliance Officers” that are contract employees of the United States Department of the Treasury that the transfer records of the US Department of the Treasury and the recipient (past and present holder of the funds transferred to Petitioner by the People’s Bank of China) reflect that the accounts opened to receive the financial assets are tagged and coded for the benefit of Petitioner. Access to the tagged and coded accounts requires lawless authorization to be provided in writing by Secretary Paulson. To date Secretary Paulson refuses to provide the required written authorization to the compliance officers. In addition one or more compliance officer (referenced herein) has been contacted by Secret Service Agents who have advised the compliance officers that the “White House” ordered that the compliance officers cease and desist from communicating in any manner with Petitioner.

16: Upon best information and belief the compliance officers mentioned in paragraph 15 have been in contact with law enforcement officers representing the Central Intelligence Agency [CIA] and the United States Department of Defense. These mentioned law enforcement officers confirm that the information provided by the compliance officers is true and correct and that upon best information and belief the “order” preventing Secretary Paulson from releasing the “tagged and coded” funds that are the sole and exclusive property of the Petitioner [Wanta] have been either lawlessly and individually controlled by Secretary Paulson and/or restricted through direct participation by other United States of America elected and/or nominated officials.

17: Upon best information and belief Troutman Sanders, LLP, and Jenkins & Gilchrist Parker Chapin LLP, seeking legal recourse on behalf of C.B.I.C. Inc. (Mr William Bonney Sr.) and the People’s Republic of China, obtained an Order to Show Cause Why a Writ of Mandamus Should Not Be Issued from the United States Supreme Court signed by Justice Ginsberg.

The People’s Republic of China, as a foreign Government, invoked the original jurisdiction authority of the United States Supreme Court to obtain the document signed by Justice Ginsberg. Upon further best information and belief the responding parties to the action files in the United States Supreme Court are exercising any and all assumed defenses to ward off the issuance of the Writ of Mandamus.

18: The United States Department of Justice and/or any agency or investigative authority contacted has refused to assist the Petitioner in the collection of lawful funds. [The] said parties refuse such assistance irrespective that there is clear and undisputed evidence that the subject funds are identified in official United States Government agency documents as being the sole and exclusive property of Petitioner. As of the date of the filing of this Petition, all requests for payment of lawful funds have been ignored by any and all elected and nominated public officials that have the implied and apparent authority to complete all requirements of the settlement documents.

GOODWIN DID NOT FORWARD COURT DOCUMENTS TO WANTA
The Defendants – Henry M. Paulson, Jr., Secretary of the US Treasury; Robert M. Kimmit, Deputy Secretary of the Treasury, James R. Wilkinson, Treasury Chief of Staff, Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Alberto R. Gonzales, US Attorney General, and the US Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond – obtained 60 days’ leave to respond rather than the usual 30 days. During this period, Court documents addressed to Mr Wanta sent to the AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. address at Attorney Steven Goodwin’s Richmond office, were not forwarded to Wanta (sabotage?).

A hearing on the Petition was scheduled for 19th October 2007 in the Alexandria Court, which was attended by the Editor of this service, Colonel Dana Wilcox, Michael C. Cottrell (who was then, as indicated above, still Treasurer and Executive Vice President of Wanta’s corporation) and Wanta. Goodwin did not attend but submitted an extraordinary notarised Affidavit in which he attempted to explain away the fact that his office had not sent the relevant documents to Wanta inter alia using the following language [International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 3 & 4, pages 345-346]:

‘I am the registered agent for AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.

My Staff obtains the mail at 5516 Falmouth Street, Suite 108, Richmond, Virginia 23230 and distributes the mail within the firm daily.

Mr Wanta had advised me that he had filed action in Federal Court in Alexandria and advised that mail pertaining to that case may be coming to the office.

No one from my staff has made me aware of any mail from the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond received on behalf of Mr Wanta or AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., in the matter of Wanta V. Paulson, et al.

I am aware that my office has received mail from the United States Attorney’s Office on behalf of Mr Wanta and/or AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. in the matter of Wanta, et al, v. Paulson, et al.’.

THE ‘FUNNY BUSINESS’ AT THE ALEXANDRIA COURTHOUSE
Thus, ‘whether intentionally or not’, receipt of relevant Court documents by Wanta during the 60-day period was neutralised by the office of Düsseldorf-born Attorney Steven Goodwin. Meanwhile, when Mr Wanta’s case was finally called, in the further hearing on 19th October 2007, before His Honor T. Selby Ellis III, born in Bogotà, Colombia (educated in law at Oxford University, who was appointed by President Reagan in 1987, has flown F4 Phantom warplanes off aircraft carriers, may be an Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) operative and is a former partner of the well-known CIA legal outfit Hunton and Williams, based in Washington DC), Wanta made an ass of himself on the podium, waving his arms around in a curious fashion; and essentially, Judge Ellis paid no attention to him whatsoever. On the contrary, on our return from the lunch break, Ellis suddenly stopped the proceedings, exited from the Courtroom, and returned some minutes later, having, we speculate, taken a call from a senior level in Washington (the Treasury or the White House). He proceeded to read aloud his pre-prepared conclusions which did not assist Wanta in the slightest.

Yet when we left the Courthouse and in the lobby, Wanta did not appear to be in the least disturbed at this development, which puzzled the Editor at the time. But no longer.

BUSH SR. WAS ‘UPSTAIRS’: SO WANTA’S PARTY WERE KICKED OUT
OF CITIBANK’S MIDTOWN OFFICES BY ARMED NYPD AGENTS
On 20th November 2007, as revisited in the timeline under Note (1) below, Wanta, Mr Cottrell and a third party appeared at Mr Cottrell’s request and by the bank’s invitation at the Midtown premises of Citibank for an appointment concerning the failure of the bank to remit the $4.5 trillion amount to Wanta/his corporation. Although Wanta had, during the 40-day stay in hotels in Alexandria and on Staten Island, told Michael Cottrell that ‘we must dispense with Christopher Story’s services, but don’t tell him’, the Editor was called twice in London while the party were languishing in Citibank’s lobby, after Wanta had instructed Cottrell to ‘Call Chris’.

• This ‘became necessary’ after two armed New York Police Department Officers appeared in the lobby and ordered the Wanta party off the premises.

Mr Michael C. Cottrell had requested access to senior Citibank personnel in conformity with the invitation. It transpired that Mr George H. W. Bush Sr. was present on the Directors’ floor of the building at the time, which was why a gigantic black stretched limousine with tinted windows was parked outside the bank’s Midtown Office. No doubt it was George Bush Sr. who had urged Citibank to kick the Wanta party off its premises under pain of NYPD armed arrest.

Recall now our basic comments about deception, at the beginning of this report. Recall also that Wanta had fallen out with Bush and had been incarcerated on trumped-up charges (see e.g. our report on ‘Wisconsingate’ dated 6th August 2007: website Archive). Recall further that Bush Sr.’s standard devilish modus operandi is always ‘bait and switch’, or the double-cross.

• Do not be in any way surprised, therefore, that these people lie to and double-cross each other all the time: that’s what they DO.

HOW THE PETITION WAS EXPLOITED FOR DECEPTION PURPOSES
Given the vast, rickety edifice of the fog of deception which is supposed to mask and obfuscate this corruption, do not be taken aback when we suggest to you that it seems highly probable that, accurate though the information contained in Wanta’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus largely was (or else he would have been imprisoned for perjury), nevertheless, it formed a layer of a deeper ongoing deception, which had also been supported by Wanta’s instructed and accepted use of the Editor’s publishing and website platform (see above). That arrangement suited the Bush-CIA-DVD Crime Syndicate and the chief behind-the-scenes manipulator, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, because the Editor had promulgated, to the best of his knowledge and belief, that the colossal accruals stashed in the huge portfolio of offshore accounts ‘belonged’ to Wanta under the Reagan Executive Order 12333 arrangements (January 1981), which recklessly allowed US intelligence operatives to set up corporations and to own the shares thereof.

• These corporations would then ostensibly ‘contract’ with the CIA and its 16+ subsidiaries, to conduct Financial Warfare and other ‘Black’ financial operations on behalf (ostensibly) of Uncle Sam but in reality of the power-usurping US “State within the State’ directed by the key North American Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst, Dachau, operative George H. W. Bush Sr.

(We now believe that the German Jew Henry Kissinger, who persuaded President Ford to sack William Colby as Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) and to replace him with George Bush Sr., whose family is also of German Jewish extraction, is the supreme DVD manipulator and snake inside or associated with the corrupted US structures.

Kissinger appeared at the satanic mass held in the Chapel of St Peter and St Paul described by the Editor’s late friend Fr. Malachi Martin and reviewed in the Editor’s large book The New Underworld Order, and was excommunicated from his US Jewish congregation in 1974 by a Rabbinical Court presided over by Rabbi Marvin Antelman. Of all the evil characters in this constellation of fiends, Kissinger is the most unpleasant. Following the 9/11 abomination, he appeared on a TV show and mocked the 9/11 dead in a high-pitched, squeaky voice (which identified him as being possessed, as it was not Kissinger himself who was speaking, but one of his ‘familiars’).

• On the very day of Princess Diana’s memorial service which this character attended, Kissinger was spotted that same evening in a night club, ogling at a belly-dancer).

AN ‘ANOMALY’ IN THE TEXT OF THE PETITION
Some further information needs to be extracted from the
Petition for a Writ of Mandamus before we go any further. Paragraph 4 stated:

‘Petitioner has attempted to access monies that were transferred through international bank monetary clearing systems to financial institutions located in the United States of America. The remitting party was the People’s Republic of China, People’s Bank. The remitting party designated that the transferred funds were for the sole and exclusive use and benefit of [the] Petitioner. The foreign entity that originated the inward remittance designated Petitioner as sole and exclusive recipient for the transferred money/financial instruments’.

Recalling that Greenspan and Snow travelled to China following the ‘unintended’ (because of the Editor’s ‘wild card’ intervention) termination effective 14th November 2005 of Wanta’s probation, paragraph 12 of the Petition stated as follows:

‘Premised on the representations of Secretary Snow and Chairman Greenspan, the legal services of Troutman Sanders, LLP [attorneys working for George Bush Sr. – Ed.] and Jenkins and Gilchrist Parker Chapin, LLP (Attorneys) were employed to complete the preparation and [to] administer the execution of agreements and documents referred to collectively as “Settlement Documents”. The following is a compilation of the significant parties that are represented as either obligors and/or beneficiaries of the Settlement Documents:

• Petitioner Wanta identified in this Petition
• Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (including but not limited to Land Baron/Xeno)
• National Security Agency (NSA)
• Department of Homeland Security
• Director of National Intelligence
• United States State Department
• United States Department of the Treasury
• United States Department of Defense
• The White House, including but not limited to the Offices of President and Vice President
• C.B.I.C. In. (Mr William Bonney Sr.)
• China (PRC), France, Great Britain, Germany and other foreign nations participating under one or more international “Protocol” including but not limited to the Reagan-Mitterrand Protocols.
• Others of interest not intentionally omitted as part of this Petition‘.

‘The entirety of the financial assets mentioned in the Settlements documents prepared by the above mentioned Attorneys concerns approximately $27 Trillion United States Dollars in value.

The portion attributable and payable to the Petitioner is $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars’.

Paragraph 20 of the Petition then stated:

‘Upon best information and belief, “Respondent” individuals, agencies, public, private, nominated and/or elected have knowingly, overtly, covertly and with specific intent conspired together to defraud Petitioner’ – which, as a professional deceiver himself, Wanta should have anticipated.

In an Affidavit attached to the Petition, Wanta stated in Paragraph 3:

‘During the most recent three to five years I have been attempting to coordinate the repatriating of substantive financial resources from foreign locations in the United States and cause the tax payments owed on the repatriated funds to be paid to the US Treasury. I have substantially completed the stated objective task with the assistance of one or more foreign sources’.

Given that the Editor of this service was furnished with Power of Attorney investigative powers to identify assets held in certain ‘Wanta’ offshore corporations as described above, which had been transferred into the PERSONAL name of Jan Morton Heger, one of his CIA lawyers, and given the brush-off we received from Coutts Bank, the Editor has considerable difficulty with this statement.

DECEPTION EXPERT DOUBLE-CROSSED BY DECEPTION EXPERTS
At the same time, it is clear that Wanta, a deception and double-cross expert, was indeed himself deceived and double-crossed over the $4.5 trillion ‘substitute’ compensation arrangement, which was represented to him (on the basis of our open information) as his payment to overcome the problem arising from the recklessly permissive state of affairs under Reagan’s Executive Order 12333, whereby operatives who deal exclusively in deceit and lies, were permitted to establish corporations. To allow professional liars and deceivers to operate corporations ostensibly under contract with US Government agencies was an act of supreme stupidity and folly which, of course greatly facilitated the wholesale, free-for-all ransacking and stealing of funds on a scale without historical precedent – operated under the ‘crooks’ charter known as the National Security Act of 1947 et seq. (which requires operatives to deny that they are intelligence operatives at all times).

Wanta was double-crossed because although he was ‘allowed’ to assume that he controlled (technically) the accounts of the myriad offshore corporations in question (which the Editor has separately listed in our reports [see Note (3)], in fact he was the de facto custodian of accounts used by Bush Sr. to hide some of the colossal accruals arising from the Bush-Clinton Criminal Syndicate’s pillaging of other people’s funds, including funds of participants in the Ponzi-model ‘Prosperity’ and ‘Humanitarian’ Programs. These funds were stolen from the participants, who broke the ‘Prudent Man Rule’, necessitating the installation of a deeply cynical, long-running, ongoing programme of diversionary agitation and propaganda designed to throw sand in the eyes of the estimated 320,000 pillaged victims, so that the stolen money remains stolen indefinitely (at least, that was what was intended). After all, under the classic Ponzi model, Peter is robbed to pay Paul: but under the more sophisticated Bush Crime Syndicate model, there is no intention to pay Paul whatsoever, i.e. the money is STOLEN: PERIOD.

The Clinton version of this is to ask the rhetorical question: who is Paul?

MONEY STOLEN FROM PETER IN ORDER NOT TO PAY PAUL
In order to prevent Peter from taking matters into his own hands, a barrage of convoluted and diversionary disinformation and interwoven fairytales has to be sustained for years on end – a chore that paid agents engaged for this sordid purpose must find tedious in the extreme, quite apart from being so soul-destroying, cruel and degrading.

Of course, the perpetrators of the thefts couldn’t care less that many families have been disrupted, marriages destroyed, people have died destitute and in despair, and suicides arising out of the scandalous state of affairs, have been reported.

They set about the stealing of the Ponzi scam victims’ money, they stole their money, and they then ordered an open-ended barrage of confusing, endlessly self-contradictory propaganda to keep the Ponzi victims hoping that their stolen money would be restored. Whether it will be restored or not, we don’t know. All we know about is the cruel, orchestrated, non-stop caterwauling which has been deliberately and cynically installed just to keep these poor people quiet.

CORRUPT U.S. GOVERNMENT RAPES, MURDERS AND PILLAGES ITS OWN PEOPLE
And the fact that the US Government’s pays cadres to disseminate such despicable lies and diversionary propaganda to the victims of the Government’s own predatory organised criminal corruption, is itself a scandal of unforgivable proportions. A Government that exists to serve the people has systematically raped, murdered and pillaged them instead – to satisfy the sordid greed and lust of a deviant bunch of mentally defective, dirty-minded criminal operatives feuding among themselves and serving in some cases foreign enemy masters.

For make no mistake: The long-range pan-German Abwehr plan to establish ‘the Thousand-Year Reich on the Ruins of the United States’, stated in Nazi documents seized by the Allies at the end of the Second World War would have been consummated had exposures of the financial corruption not brought about the disintegration of the inverted pyramid of lies, with the truly remarkable consequences that are about to unfold.

CURIOUS ’INTERCHANGEABILITY’ OF U.S. ‘INTELLIGENCE’ ACCOUNTS
The fact that the offshore corporate accounts and monies from which Wanta was removed when Bush Sr., in collaboration with the Clinton White House and the Governor of Wisconsin, Tommy Thompson, arranged for him to be arrested in Lausanne on 7th July 1992 on a charge of having failed to pay Wisconsin State tax (even though of course Wisconsin has no external jurisdiction), appear to be ‘interchangeable’ between US operatives, was made apparent to the Editor of this service when he made the discovery in April 2006 that the ‘Wanta’ corporate accounts held with Lloyds Bank TSB, Aylesbury, had been shifted into the PERSONAL name of ‘former’ Wanta CIA lawyer Jan Morton Heger.

How is this possible? The Editor cannot answer that question: but what he CAN do is to record that Wanta told him, when the Editor queried why the accounts had been moved unto the name of Jan Morton Heger, that ‘intelligence operatives can do things like that’.

• Nor did he seem in the slightest concerned that he no longer controlled these accounts, even though he had provided the Editor with a limited Power of Attorney to establish their status.

So, on the one hand, Wanta needed to know their status, while on the other hand, he wasn’t ‘phased’ that the accounts had slithered into the control of Jan Morton Heger. The Lloyds TSB Manager himself asked the Editor how much money the accounts contained. Of course the Editor had no idea, but he answered: ‘Billions’.

WANTA RELEASED FROM JAIL IMMEDIATELY AFTER 9/11
As noted, Wanta was incarcerated and undoubtedly suffered badly during his time in the Gulag. Then 9/11 occurred. What happened next? On or around 19th September 2001, which is to say just over ONE WEEK AFTER 9/11, Wanta was suddenly RELEASED FROM JAIL.

Specifically Mr Wanta was collected by AUSTRIAN-BORN Gerald Seichert, and was driven to his daughter’s home in Wisconsin, where he languished under probation until the Editor of this service paid for the Court’s ‘restitution’ (payment of the $14,129 in State tax for the third time (plus interest) which had already been paid TWICE, in May and June 1992), as a consequence of which Wanta’s probation was shortened by five years and two months (from the scheduled expiry date of 28th November 2010, to the 14th November 2005, when Mr Matthew J. Frank, Secretary, the Wisconsin Department of Corrections, signed his Absolute Discharge [see facsimile: International Currency Review, Volume 31, Numbers 3 & 4, page 202 (Fourth Quarter 2006)].

In passing here, we may record that there was an ominous DELAY of four months between the Editor’s payment of his private money by Steven Goodwin to the Wisconsin State Department of Corrections on 21st July 2005, and the Absolute Discharge on 14th November, during which period the Editor became extremely concerned. It appears that agonised discussions were taking place behind the scenes, as the CIA had disseminated the lie that Wanta was dead; and now, all of a sudden, he was able to move around and prove that he wasn’t.

• But why was Wanta suddenly released from jail just over a week following 9/11? Clearly the two events were linked – a matter that had puzzled the Editor for a long time.

UNTIL, that is, the Editor finally realised that the so-called ‘Wanta’ accounts were/are some of the so-called ‘Bush Sr.’ accounts, which is why George Bush Sr. says ‘the money is mine’.

JAILED TO PREVENT WANTA FROM LEAKING 9/11 PLOT IN ADVANCE
On 14th July 2009, the Editor obtained specific confirmation from an impeccably knowledgeable US source of the accuracy of his deduction that the so-called ‘Wanta’ accounts were indeed some of (if not most of) the accounts then used by Bush to stash stolen and other monies arising not just from the Financial Warfare operations against the Soviet Union (which was also partly true) but, more generally, from endless criminal finance operations conducted under cover of Bush’s de facto control of the CIA-Intelligence Power: hence Langley’s formal designation as ‘the George Bush Center for Intelligence’.

• As we have stated previously, the word ‘Terrorism’ should be substituted for ‘Intelligence’ here – not least since money-laundering, the ongoing stealing of funds, and illicit ‘Black’ finance scams generally are TERRORISM as defined by the perpetrators’ own pre-prepared Patriot Act legislation.

Now, what had happened was that Bush Sr. and Clinton and the CIA conspired to remove Wanta, a difficult character, from access to the accounts by concocting the farrago of lies and diversionary claptrap that we have recounted at length in our ‘Wantagate’ reports. The ‘falling out’ was in fact a standard ‘switch’ or double-cross perpetrated by the Godfather Bush against an operative who had originally been entrusted with certain tasks, including US Financial Warfare Operations against the Soviet Union, by President Reagan, who had called Wanta ‘my junkyard dog’. Wanta himself told the Editor that Reagan used to brief him personally, and that George Bush Sr. (then Vice President and therefore in charge of the National Security Council) was usually not present at these briefings.

OUR DEDUCTION ABOUT THE ACCOUNTS IS CONFIRMED
When the Editor enquired on 14th July 2009 whether his deduction that the Wanta offshore accounts were/are ‘Bush Sr.’ accounts, which was CONFIRMED, he also asked: ‘Why was Wanta released from jail almost immediately after 9/11?’ Wanta was suddenly collected from jail (see above) by Gerald Siechert, of Austrian extraction, and driven to his daughter’s home. WHY?

The authoritative answer to this question:

• Because Wanta knew about the planned 9/11 operation, and the Three Presidents (Bush Sr., Clinton, Bush) and their co-conspirators were concerned that Wanta, who had fallen out with Bush (and was deeply resentful of the way he had been treated) might reveal what he knew IN ADVANCE OF the atrocity. But after it had occurred, that was no longer a problem, so he was released’.

• Have you understood the significance of what has just been stated?

Recall that the former President of Italy, Francesco Cossiga, told Corriera della Sera, Italy’s most respected newspaper, on 5th December 2007, that ‘the disastrous 9/11 attack has been planned and realised by the CIA and Mossad’. There is no way that such a senior intelligence officer as a former Italian President would make such a statement, if it was not true: WHICH IT IS.

PROOF THAT 9/11 WAS MASS MURDER BY THREE PRESIDENTS
THREE Presidents of the United States, with the CIA and Mossad [see below] conspired to murder over 3,000 people in order to achieve their filthy, sordid objectives. Not only is this a case of mass murder, for which ALL OFFICIALS WHO HAVE STOOD IN THE WAY OF THE ARREST OF THESE THREE CRIMINAL MURDERERS stand likewise accused of aiding and abetting mass murder and likely breach of the Misprision of Felony Statute, but we are dealing with TREASON as well.

It is BEYOND A DISGRACE that law enforcement in the United States has not arrested these mass murderers. We all know that elements of law enforcement are themselves corrupt and/or ‘work for’ George Bush Sr. and his imploding, defeated criminal syndicate. But now that the economic and financial consequences of the operations of these criminal elements at the highest levels of the US Government – including inside the Obama White House – are destroying the lives of many millions of Americans and dragging the Rest of the World into a depression with prospectively devastating consequences for humanity, it is GROTESQUE that this criminal crisis is being allowed to continue because the American elements concerned haven’t got the basic guts to arrest these gangsters without further ado. Robert Gates, the current Pentagon Chief, was formerly the CIA’s Director of Central Intelligence: does he therefore lack all traces of integrity?

VREELAND DID PREDICT THE 9/11 ABOMINATIONS
Office of Naval Intelligence operative Lt. Delmart Mark Vreeland, whom the Editor interviewed at length in Niagara Falls, Canada, in May 2003 [see timeline, Note (1)] DID reveal IN ADVANCE the intended atrocity, in his Prison Note, written from a jail cell in Canada, in August 2001. He managed to have his information transferred to Canadian intelligence contacts, who are therefore implicated in the atrocity if they did nothing. They certainly did not resort to the ONLY weapon that works: pre-emptive publicity. No, they preferred people to die en masse, rather than to stick their necks out.

Vreeland’s ‘Prison Note’, written in August 2001, contained the exclamations: ‘They will paint me crazy and call me a liar. Let one happen, stop the rest!!!’ Having interviewed Vreeland over a period of several days in May 2003, the Editor is certain that, while this operative was/is an induced MK-ULTRA-type ‘multiple personality disorder’ victim (whose various ‘alters’, including an ‘assassin alter’ can be activated by pre-programmed phrases delivered by handlers) – and despite his serial low-life criminal behaviour and that he scammed the Editor’s VISA card to the tune of £1,600, he told the truth in discussions about global issues.

In the course of a live interview on 5th June 2002, Vreeland said that he conveyed his warning about 9/11 in advance of the event, to Canadian intelligence. ‘Yes I did, most definitely. I told it to their face, my lawyers told them to their face, and they knew what was going on. As far as I know, Colonel Kispel and his partner informed the United States and Ottawa immediately, through the RCMP and NSIS and CSIS [Canadian intelligence organisations]. (4)

In March 2005, the Editor was informed by a Pentagon-linked operative that Vreeland (who had threatened the Editor with death while he was riding from Niagara Falls back to New York City in May 2003, in a bizarre ‘switch’ attempt) ‘is in solitary confinement for a very long time, his case is sealed, and he is no longer a threat to you’. However the fact that Vreeland has been ‘taken down’ does NOT invalidate the accuracy of his geopolitical information, of the information he conveyed to this Editor about the endless damage and evil that George Bush Sr. has inflicted upon the United States and the world, and of his ACCURATE prior warning about 9/11.

• MORE DETAILS ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED TO VREELAND:
Correspondents have mined the prison data and have provided the Editor [17th July 2009] with the following information. After his arrest in Iowa in October 2004, Vreeland was convicted in 2006 of 13 felony charges, and was sentenced in October 2008 to 336 years in prison in Colorado. His current so-called ‘facility assignment’ is Buena Vista Correctional Complex. His estimated Parole Eligibility Date is 2nd June 2124. His Parole Hearing Date is 1st March 2124, when he will be 156 years old.

Vreeland was indeed a low-life criminal, but what is (deliberately) not understood is that the ONI recruits such personnel for some of its operations. This practice has the advantage that when the time comes to dispense with the operative’s services, the ONI operative in question can easily be discredited because of their serial criminal behaviour, as in Vreeland’s case. However as a multiple personality disorder MK-ULTRA-type victim, Vreeland was perfectly lucid (and was extremely well informed and intelligent) provided he was ‘on his meds’, and the right ‘alter’ was being consulted.

His knowledge of certain matters in the Soviet Union was accurate (which the Editor, who is also the Editor of Soviet Analyst, knew, because of his own special knowledge), and the details that he provided concerning the criminal international operations of George Bush Sr., conveyed to the Editor by Vreeland in May 2003, were subsequently found by the Editor to be true.

In the Editor’s opinion, his undoubtedly necessary conviction on 13 of multiple felony charges was actually allowed to go forward because he had opened one of three diplomatic bags which he had couriered from Moscow, which is treason. Colin Powell, Secretary of State du jour, had issued a Warrant for his extradition from Canada, which the Canadian authorities had failed to execute.

• Moreover Vreeland’s exclamation ‘Let one happen, stop the rest!!!’ encapsulates what was intended with respect to 9/11 – which Wanta knew about ahead of the event, as well.

OUR WARNING ABORTED A NUCLEAR EXPLOSION
The Editor is informed by reliable sources that our exposure of what we knew about a plan under the Bush II Administration to explode a nuclear device on US soil, resulted in the operation being aborted. The Editor had sent a message to a source linked to US military personnel containing the following sentence: ‘Does the military realise that these criminals are playing nuclear blackmail on US soil as their leverage to avoid paying the (Wanta) Settlement? If they don’t (which I doubt) they need to now!. Please inform the Colonel of my views urgently’: see our report dated 25th October 2007: Archive. In the subsequent two segments, we wrote:

PLANNING A NUKE EXPLOSION TO AVOID PAYING WANTA?
Whether these fears were well founded or not, the ruthlessness of the cornered criminals that we have been having to deal with these past 18 months is undoubtedly such that they would be willing to go to any lengths to get their own way. After all, they were prepared to sacrifice the lives of more than 3,000 people on 9/11, inter alia to procure the destruction of the original copies of a mountain of derivatives contracts held by Cantor Fitzgerald that were falling due imminently for settlement in US dollars. The firm lost 658 of its staff in that abomination.

During the chaos, a huge volume of gold was stolen from the underground vaults of Bank of Nova Scotia. After getting away with those atrocities, the idea that a man like Cheney, a ‘former’ satanic MK-Ultra and Omega controller and operative with links into organised crime, would cringe at a rogue operation to indulge in nuclear blackmail on US soil in order to create conditions under which the stolen $4.5 trillion could be retained and not transferred to the corporate securities account with Morgan Stanley, New York, would be fanciful.

• The military Colonel’s response to the Editor’s message on this score, received by our veteran intermediary on 19th October was: ‘He is probably correct’.

TWIN CITIES PREDICTION JUDGED TO BE ACCURATE, TOO
It has been acknowledged by several special sources that the Editor was ‘probably correct’ too, about the intended Twin Cities atrocity which we exposed last April [2007]. Under that scenario, a nuclear device was to be exploded in the Twin Cities of Minneapolis-St Paul on 1st September 2008 – the (very late) opening date for the pre-election Republican National Convention.

Using Kabbalistic Illuminati numerology [which these madmen go by], that date devolves to 9/11 [September: 9; 1 (first of the month); 2008 = 2+8 = 10; +1 = 11]. Since it is well known that these maddened Luciferians have a hang-up about TWINS, the long-range strategic takeover plan called for a catastrophic atrocity at the beginning of the Bush II reign on 9/11 with the destruction of the Twin Towers, followed at the end of the Bush II reign with a catastrophic abomination in the Twin Cities in the course of which the Republican Party would be destroyed – providing the pretext for the perpetuation of Bush II under a dictatorship.

CHENEY AND STRUCTURES WORKING OVERTIME TO STOP ‘IT ALL COMING OUT’
In line with the tendency of officials lies to decay within a rough time-span of seven years, former Vice President Cheney, the embodiment of CIA evil, has been engaged for weeks in pre-emptive public appearances in anticipation of an emerging high-voltage campaign, which appears to be orchestrated, to discredit him and make him the scapegoat for the 9/11 and other atrocities – so that the Three Criminal American Presidents, the CIA and Mossad somehow manage to avoid the consequences of their crimes.

Apart from the Three Criminal Presidents, of these perpetrators, by far the most reckless seems to be Mossad and its faction inside the highest-level US structures, starting with the White House. These people appear to believe that a repetition of mass pogroms against the Jews which erupted in Germany, innocent as well as those who are complicit in all the corruption and abominations, is becoming more and more likely, as more of the suffering population wakes up to the extraordinarily elevated level of people of Jewish extraction who are implicated in these scandals.

NEW COORDINATED 9/11 LEAKS BY ‘LICENSED’ U.S. AGENTS
Recent revelations by ‘licensed’ US agents implicating Richard Cheney in preparations for the 9/11 abominations can hardly be considered coincidental. An allegation that Cheney, Scooter Libby and the CIA operative Stephen A. Cambone discussed with Osama Bin laden (CIA operative Tim Osman) the use of Al-Qaeda-CIA operatives to be employed as patsies and fall guys in the 9/11 context, and repeated information about the pre-9/11 involvement of Cheney, Libby and Rumsfeld , together with a new wave of 9/11 detail, are now being widely disseminated.

In his analysis dated 10th July, Wayne Madsen reported on the National Security Agency’s own internal ‘security’ force, known as the ‘Q’ Group, which he said ‘has grown to an immense security and counter-intelligence force, with an estimated 1,000 Government employees, contractors and paid informants. NSA’s Security force is reportedly primarily tasked with plugging any leaks of classified or other information that point to the US Government’s involvement with the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001’. Madsen elaborated:

‘NSA Security is also able to utilize the Agency’s most sophisticated electronic surveillance systems to monitor the activities of journalists’ – as the Editor of this service knows only too well, as every telephone conversation on both sides of the Atlantic attracts hoards of these impertinent electronic eavesdroppers, working for Fort Meade, GCHQ, Munich (DVD), Paris, you name it. This enables the Editor to play these nasty people along at their own game, of course.

‘The cell phones’, wrote Madsen, ‘of journalists are routinely used as listening devices, even when turned off. And what was considered a sure-fire method of avoiding having a cell phone used as a transmitter – removing the batteries in what became known as ‘batteries out’ conversations – is no longer safe’. Interestingly, the Pentagon-related operative referenced above asked the Editor to remove the batteries from his cell phone, which he also did – indicating that US operatives seem to be more concerned about their own competing agencies eavesdropping on their conversations, than about talking with ‘foreign’ parties.

‘Even when the batteries are removed, the Global Positioning System (GPS) chip in cell phones continues to have enough residual power that two or three pings from satellites can give away a person’s location, plus what other uniquely identifiable cell phones are at the same location’.

‘The bottom line is that a number of NSA personnel who were on duty in the months leading up to 9/11, the day of the attacks, and subsequent weeks and months, are aware of undeniable facts that point to a massive cover-up by the Bush-Cheney Administration of the circumstances surrounding 9/11 ’ – and the resulting stench of the rotting corpses of 3,000 human beings – ‘including what actually befell UA flight 93 and WHO was issuing direct military orders from the White House’.

‘The Obama Administration… has turned up the heat and is resorting to even more draconian methods to ensure silence. The word from inside NSA is that a state of fear exists and the mission of the Agency – to conduct surveillance of foreign communications to provide threat indications and warnings to US troops and policymakers and protect sensitive US Government communications from unauthorized eavesdropping – is suffering as a result’.

On 15th July, Madsen further reported that ‘The Obama Administration has shown every indication of protecting Cheney and other top Bush Administration officials from scrutiny. Obama recently extended Cheney’s Secret Service protection by six months, an indication that the White House is concerned that international arrest warrants for homicide may soon be issued against the former Vice President’, one of the most evil creatures ever to have occupied the US Vice Presidency.

• For ‘Obama Administration and ‘White House’ here, read Rahm Emanuel. Israel Defence Force and Mossad ‘Kidon’ (Bayonet) personnel are reported to have penetrated the Pentagon under Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and Feith, according to Madsen.

BITTER FEUDING OVER THE MONEY BY RIVAL INTEL FACTIONS
Complicating the chaos within the gigantic US Intelligence Power is a bitter ongoing internal power struggle that, broadly speaking, reflects a deadly conflict between the Bush-Kissinger-Greenspan dominated DVD-oriented Crime Syndicate element, and the components opposed to the ‘Germans’ inside the corrupted and feuding US structures.

However, far from placing the interests of the nation at the top of their agenda, the ‘non-Bushites’ have been fighting the Bush-directed cabal over the money. The two broad divisions spend their time fighting for control of the stolen funds: that’s what they DO. And the Bush Syndicate people are assisted in this endeavour by the Mossad Israelis, including the very sinister ‘Political Action Committee’ represented inside the White House especially by Rahm Emanuel.

The endless warfare between these two broad groups within the fractious US Intelligence Power concerns control of the money and nothing else, requiring some modification of our hitherto perhaps too monolithic view of the Intelligence Power.

According to that analysis, the arrogant ‘State within the State’, represented by the CIA and its 16+ ‘subsidiaries’ and the National Security Council controlled by the Vice President, has usurped control of the Federal Government . The basic means by which this has been achieved has been the familiar one of ensuring that candidates for and occupants of the highest positions within the structures are controlled intelligence operatives who answer to their handlers. The Intelligence Power has achieved this illicit status thanks primarily to its ‘penetration powers’. The other two sides of the power triangle – the Military Power and the Party Power (divided dialectically into two controlled segments) – are thus penetrated and largely controlled by the Intelligence Power.

WHOEVER WINS ELECTIONS, THE CIA/NSC ALWAYS WINS
Therefore, it is essentially neither here nor there which political party wins elections, since the Intelligence Power always wins. There is no difference between this system and the overt or covert Soviet model, where elections also take place: but it is likewise neither here nor there who wins in the overt or covert USSR, as the controlling Communist Establishment (which operates currently underground and through Putin’s Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) apparat) always wins.

Bitter rivalry, tension and warfare within the US Intelligence Power over control of the stolen and diverted money means ironically, however, that the huge Intelligence Power has weakened itself, since ‘a house divided against itself cannot stand’. However this is a brutally strong and arrogant house, accustomed to getting its own way, and ruthless in the execution of its plans (although not quite as ruthless as the Mossad ‘Kidon’ cadres with which elements of the US Intelligence Power collaborate). Even more ironically (for the uninitiated, at any rate) is the odd reality that the sole remaining ruthless supporters of the Bush Financial Criminal Syndicate within the criminalist Intelligence Power nexus, are the Mossad Israelis.

THE RULE OF LAW SOLUTION WILL PREVAIL: ‘SET IN STONE’
With these considerations in mind, let’s review some recent developments. It is understood that on or about 11th July, after hastily convened meetings in various locations in the Washington area, a delegation flew in a rush to London. Our understanding is that certain clarifications were sought from highest levels in the British capital following the conveyance of certain papers by fax that we can’t go into [see earlier references to papers submitted to Thames Valley Police, Special Branch].

The US delegation received the answer they didn’t want, namely that the payee list had been redefined to conform with original requirements last weekend and to incorporate a certain designated line payment, which instruction can be summarised as follows:

• The Rule of Law will be applied in accordance with specified required arrangements,
and this is ‘set in stone’.

This setback shocked the US participants, coming so soon after supposed President Obama had been given a flea in his ear in Moscow, where, according to reports, officials refused to shake his hand. We presume that this gesture was intended to indicate that they couldn’t shake his hand as Moscow ‘doesn’t know’ whether President Obama is legitimately in office or not.

DEVELOPING U.S. MILITARY CRISIS OVER OBAMA’S STATUS
As is now well known, Major Stefan Frederick Cook, a US Army Engineer, who was called up to serve in Afghanistan but had protested that he could not conscientiously comply since he could only accept orders from a Commander-in-Chief who holds his position legitimately, suddenly had his call-up revoked by the Department of the Army, US Army Human Resources Command, St Louis, MO, implying a belated recognition by the US Military that there is doubt even in the Pentagon over the President’s legitimacy.

Clearly, this state of affairs represents a grave crisis because should the situation not be regularised, and if the logic of the matter were to be followed through, all US military deployments and operations would have to cease, with the personnel being recalled from theatre – which could be what underlies this extraordinary state of affairs. If we pursue this logic further, we can see how the United States’ enemies would benefit from this dimension of the crisis, which ‘just happens’ to coincide with the deliberate, instrumental, perverse and clearly calculated sabotage at the highest levels of the Settlements payouts – blockage of which is directly associated with the non-payment of the Obama Stimulus monies (barely 10% of which has apparently been remitted) and therefore non-payment of promised funding to the desperate US States.

BANKS REFUSE TO HONOUR CALIFORNIA I.O.U.s
As a consequence, California is issuing IOUs which, when we last checked, banks were refusing to honour. It is understood that paychecks due to State employees in certain States were not paid on time (Pennsylvania being a case in point), and that ad hoc arrangements such as California State employees being ordered not to come in to work on the final three Fridays of each month, are spreading across the nation.

In California, according to Martin D. Weiss PhD, counties are awash with mortgage meltdown data: on 22nd June, Weiss reported that 5.32% of Los Angeles County mortgages were 90 days past due, with the following figures for many other counties: Monterrey County, 8.02%; Imperial, 8.13%; San Bernardino, 8.66%; Madeira, 9.21%; San Joaquin, 9.53%; Riverside, 10.2%; Merced, 10.57%.

With foreclosures skyrocketing, the State’s unemployment rate had surged to 11.5% by June, with 739,500 jobs having been lost since June 2008. California’s projected $24.3 billion State budget assumes no further deterioration of the economy, whereas the reality is that if the crude sabotage directed from the White House continues, the downward spiral will guarantee a deficit twice that size, with an unemployment rate approaching 20% and California’s credit rating, already the lowest of all US States, reduced to junk status.

• There are in any case indications that the true rate of unemployment in the United States, measured on discarded criteria, may already be approaching 20%.

THE GHANA EPISODE, PLUS: OBAMA ‘WANTS HIS CUT’
Unconfirmed reports were received in this office that, having been rebuffed in Moscow, Obama and/or his entourage attempted, even at this very late stage, to ‘do deals’ in Ghana, where, as in Moscow, ‘everything fell apart’. That would have reflected the presence in the Ghanaian capital of British intelligence advisers who serve the only upholder of the Rule of Law in this context: Her Majesty The Queen. MI5 operates in all Commonwealth countries.

There have also been references from ‘underworld’ sources gathered by this service that one reason for the continued White House sabotage operations is that ‘Obama wants his cut’.

According to sources the previous three corrupt Presidents became billionaires or more, and Obama sees no reason why these precedents should not be followed in his case, too.

WARRING INTEL GROUPS FURIOUS BUT IMPOTENT
When the team returned to Washington from London having been informed that the Rule of Law is to be applied and that the existing required Settlement arrangements will not be varied, the two warring components of the criminalised US Intelligence Power, neither of which has the interests of the American people or the Rest of the World in focus, were believed now to be at each others’ throats, furious and sullen like spoiled children who cannot get their own way, but impotent – and not just because the Rule of Law presupposes the developing total and absolute termination of exotic, illicit, untaxed off-balance sheet financing consistently with Basel-II and Basel-III, and with the legitimate requirements of the wronged British supreme power.

Specifically, the two warring intelligence community factions had to contemplate, at weekend meetings in the White House and elsewhere, the reality that NEITHER side within the Intelligence Power has ‘won’, but rather that the Dollar Refunding process requested by The Queen when she asked the G-7 powers to proceed with it ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’ in 2006, will prevail. Dealings will take place with the party who is neutral and can be trusted and who does not belong to, or have anything to do with, the warring factions, as everyone ‘in the know’ is well aware.

Sources allied with the Bush Syndicate in touch with this service have ceased contact since we published the preceding report stressing the tax, tax evasion and money laundering angle. Others with whom we have been in contact through our intermediaries have been told that they have to comply – all of which has come as a shock to certain parties, which had every intention of carving up the cake in accordance with their own preferences rather than with what was agreed and is required for consistency with the Rule of Law. Tax will be deducted at source: the Internal revenue Service will be paid and funds will be remitted net of tax [see the preceding report concerning tax liabilities and the tax evasion and money laundering dimension].

Accordingly, to back up the released money, the United States was reported on 14th October to be buying up gold, a process believed to have been completed by close of business on that day.

OUR THINKING ON DERIVATIVES GOES ‘MAINSTREAM’
Interestingly, Bloomberg reported on 15th July that Mark Mobius, Executive Chairman of Templeton Asset Management in Singapore, was reported to have said in a telephone interview from Istanbul on 13th July that a new financial crisis will develop in a few years’ time as a consequence of failure to regulate derivatives and the additional overall global liquidity that is ostensibly to be disbursed associated with stimulus spending. ‘Political pressures from the investment banks and from all the people that make money in derivatives’ will prevent adequate regulation, Mobius said, echoing the long published assessment of this service. ‘Banks make so much money with these things that they don’t want transparency because the spreads are so generous when there’s no transparency’. He added that a ‘very bad’ crisis may emerge within five to seven years as stimulus money adds to financial volatility, after Governments have pledged about $2.0 billion in stimulus spending.

But as we have seen, in the United States, hardly any of that money has been forthcoming – due exclusively to the sabotage of the Settlements and infighting within the CIA over control of the money, referenced above. While this selfish and criminal behaviour has persisted, the world’s biggest banks have written down and lost at least $1.5 trillion because the bottom fell out of the derivatives sector when the real cash-cash sovereign funds were placed into ‘lockdown’ between 10th and 12th September 2008, as advised by this service. Against that background, the oil price, falsified due to criminal speculation in syndicate-participating oil corporations’ dealing rooms, fell steeply from around $147 per barrel, to about $30 in the final quarter of 2008. Global share markets lost 50% of their value in 2008, shedding $28.7 trillion.

WARNING BY WORLD BANK’S CHIEF ECONOMIST
The Chief Economist with the World Bank, Justin Lin, said on 15th July that $30 trillion had (prior to that very day’s stock market surge) been wiped off global stock markets, and $4.0 trillion off US house prices. Mr Lin was particularly concerned that the global real economy could easily fall into a ‘deflationary spiral’ if excess industrial capacity is not cut back. ‘Excess capacity has built up, and unless this issue is addressed, we will face a deflationary spiral’.

Thus, while the corrupt financial sector has been partially rescued, the real economy is in absolute agony and threatens to drag the whole world into a black hole – thanks to the perverse, criminal, intransigent, terrorist, treasonous sabotaging operations conducted from the Intelligence Power-controlled White House under four US Presidents.

It is already the case that productive capacity usage has fallen to 72% in Germany, 69% in the United States, 65% in Japan and below 50% in some large developing countries. In the United Kingdom, unemployment in the three months to the end of May jumped to 7.6%, a 12-year high – confirming anecdotal evidence known to the Editor of this service of firms systematically trawling through their payroll to assess who they can sack next.

In a global downwave, countries cannot count on competitive currency depreciation as a way out to boost exports, since export markets are unable to respond. ‘No country can count on currency depreciation and exports as a way out. Unless we deal with excess capacity, it will wreak havoc on all countries’, Mr Lin added. The Japanese real economy, where headline inflation has again turned negative at – 1.1%, and deflation has now returned to stay, will shrink by 7% in real terms this year, following a catastrophic 14.2% annualised output contraction in the first quarter, when the trade account moved into deficit as well.

GEITHNER’S ‘STANDARDISED CONTRACT’ RED HERRING
Incredibly, the US Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner, who only knows about derivatives, has recently urged Congress to ‘rein in’ the derivatives sector, which has virtually collapsed (see above) with legislation that would be ‘difficult to evade’. The US Treasury Secretary essentially repeated Mr Obama’s ‘call’ to compel exchanges or ‘regulated platforms’ to apply ‘standardised’ derivatives contracts, and to regulate all dealers. This latest Geithner intervention is almost beyond belief, as it presupposes (a) that contracts for fraudulent ‘assets’ with no known value (beyond ‘what someone is prepared to pay for them’) and no recourse to real underlying income streams, can be made ‘uniform’; and (b) that his earlier free-wheeling insistence that the derivatives sector must be reignited was perhaps, er, a little over-hasty.

REARGUARD OPERATION TO ‘RESCUE’ FRAUDULENT FINANCE
For his part, Tim Ryan, head of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, told The Financial Times [7th July 2009] that ‘the securitisation market has seized up’. He then uttered the following ‘Geithnerism’: ‘We are convinced that getting securitisation started again is the single most important question facing the capital markets today’.

A Citi Group report, cited in the same newspaper analysis, has stated that ‘about $8,700 billion of assets are currently funded by securitisation [globally] … and [if] this securitised leverage matures with no replacement, global economies will be forced to contract’ – which, being interpreted, would mean that replacement, given that the securitisation market has ‘dried up’, will not materialise.

That is indeed, the case, because this illicit, exotic off-balance sheet financing is finished. That was then: this is now. The Rule of Law will be applied and the dislocations that are talking place will be alleviated when funds arising from transparent taxable transactions are deposited ON-balance sheet, ONTO the books, consistently with the Rule of Law norm that will prevail.

DISLOCATIONS ARE DUE EXCLUSIVELY TO CORRUPTION AND FRAUD
Conversely, the dislocations that have taken place and which continue today, are exclusively the consequence of the sabotage operations directed against the Rule-of-Law Settlements from the White House under four Presidents, with the enthusiastic assistance of serial criminal financial enterprises like Citibank – all of which, with their associates, have been engaged in perpetrating Financial Terrorism against the American people and the Rest of the World, given the feuding US intelligence community background described in outline above.

Put another way, it is too late for the likes of the criminal financial enterprise Citigroup to try to blackmail the world in the manner implied by its cited warning that further securitisation may not be forthcoming to cover maturities on $8,700 billion of assets around the world.

• Citi was itself extensively responsible for this state of affairs, and it is now too late to attempt to reverse the damage for which it is partly responsible.

On the contrary, the Rule of Law will prevail and the criminal financial enterprises, including the disaffected, warring, self-centred components of the US Intelligence Power, will comply with it.

AUTOMATON WHITE HOUSE KEEPS ON ‘KICKING AGAINST THE PRICKS’
Given this ‘real world’ outcome, further crass sabotage operations (‘kicking against the pricks’) sponsored by the White House – notwithstanding the ever more conspicuously desperate plight of the US States and economy – have been countered with universal disgust and contempt, since we last reported. On 14th July, the Government tried to ‘tap into the money’, a criminal operation that was ‘stopped by the Swiss’ enforcement operatives [see earlier reports], when comparing the US payment ‘screen’ with the screen in Basle.

It is reported to us that the US military, under Robert Gates – the former CIA Director of Central Intelligence, no less – is supposed now to be in charge of enforcing the releases. Yet given the recalcitrant attempt by the Government itself to interfere with the releases on 15th July, Gates’ effectiveness in this context, given his compromised position, appears to be typically ambivalent. Neveretheless he, too, has to comply.

On 15th July, we were advised that Chinese parties intervened and collapsed the release process, complaining that they were unhappy with the so-called ‘revised’ terms arising from the redefined payee list (see the line item payment referenced above) – a development requiring explanation.

PAYEE LIST REDEFINED TO INCLUDE A KEY ‘LINE ITEM PAYMENT’
Because what this means is that the ‘terms’ that had prevailed prior to the US delegation to London being given the appropriate dressing down and the redefined payee list, diverged from the terms required by the wronged British sovereign power – and furthermore that the Chinese parties in question were going along with this apparent intention to divert components of the release funds. So when the Chinese found out that the US delegation had been told in no uncertain terms that the ‘Rule of Law’ arrangements for the releases inherent in the just redefined payee list including the mentioned line item payment will prevail and that these proper arrangements are ‘set in stone’, they objected. The Chinese straddle both sides of the corrupted, criminal, feuding factions within the tawdry US Intelligence Power, you see.

LAST-MINUTE SCAMMING OPERATIONS BY THE CROOKS
What also emerged on 15th July was as follows:

• Two attempts to ‘release’ on 15th July were aborted when the ‘screens didn’t match’ due to the fact that the payee list had been redefined as required by the British sovereign power (and Basle) to include the specific line item payment. On at least the second occasion, it emerged that certain people were scheduled to be paid who should not be being paid, i.e. that the detailed payment arrangements in the United States had not yet been re-adjusted BACK to what the key sovereign power, the wronged power, requires. This, as explained above, is the pattern of payment that will prevail, incorporating the mentioned line item payment, and the Swiss enforcers reporting to Basle are ensuring that compliance with these requirements is absolute.

• George Bush Sr. is STILL skimming money ‘off the top’.

• Certain of Obama’s people knew that Bush Sr. was stealing and skimming money off the top of illicit trades exploiting the payout release funds, but withheld this information from the supposed President (i.e., are complicit). Count Rahm Emanuel in here.

• Criminal former Vice President Cheney is reported to us to have had his hand in the till as well, as usual. Ironically, since off-balance sheet monies will not be allowed, all this money that these criminal fools are still trying to steal, is going to be worth zero.

• Insistence on application of the ‘Rule of Law’ solution has revealed that these criminal parties had, as indicated above, long since ‘divided the cake’ up among themselves, despite still fighting over the slices, contrary to what was pre-agreed, required – and necessitated, in accordance with the World Court Writ of Execution probably handed to Obama in London on 1st April, as reported.

• Rearguard sabotage operations are being/have been run out of the Obama White House by the so-called ‘Political Action Committee’ (PAC) operation headed by Rahm Emanuel, who stole funds from the murdered Vincent Foster, who was believed to have been handling up to $500 billion. Emanuel, a treasonous Mossad (Irgun) operative, who ‘knows all about’ 9/11, is closely linked to the Clinton Crime Family component of the Syndicate, and was/is the go-between between Mossad, the Clintons and Bush Sr. Rahm Emanuel took the funds to Chicago where he became a partner with Wasserstein Perella and Company, the entity with which the former President of the World Bank, James Wolfensohn, was associated. Some time ago, two participants in the PAC were arrested for violations of national security (stealing state secrets).

EXCERPTS FROM A CRUCIAL AFFIDAVIT
In an Affidavit prepared and signed on 29th December 2008 by Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., notarised by Raemarie T. Kovaly, Notary Public, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and conveyed to the Editor of this service for onward forwarding, Mr Cottrell reported as follows [verbatim]:

… On September 12, 2008 between approximately 8:37 a.m. EST and 8:52 a.m. EST, Mr Dana V. Wilcox telephoned me and discussed the following items:

(a) That the above-mentioned items [referencing matters of global importance referenced earlier in the same Affidavit] combined with the current subprime/derivative débacle now requires a new “Private Funding Refunding Operation of the US Dollar” – without US Government funding;

(b) That the new refunding flow charts would resemble the flow charts [that] Delmarva Timber Trust, et al., had developed under Mr Wilcox and Mr Cottrell;

(c) That said flow chart system identified joint venture projects between Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. and Delmarva Timber Trust, et al., to create tax incentives and full tax payment to the US Government, et al., as part of the refunding process, and fund numerous low-income housing, waste management, other infrastructure projects, and administration auditing teams for the projects;

(d) That these flow charts and processes were the actual basis of the “Wanta Plan” activities, as presented to Mr Christopher Story, FRSA, by Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., March 15 and 16, 2006;

(e) That Mr Wilcox agreed that upon receipt of the G-7 Refunding Funds to Pennsylvanian Investments, Inc. Securities Account at Morgan Stanley NYC, per the “Wanta/G-7 Plan”, he would act as ”Consultant at Least” for Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. and Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.;

(f) That the people identified with the [then] proposed Obama Economic Team – i.e., Dr Ben Bernanke, Mr Robert Rubin, Mr Timothy Geithner, Mr Lawrence Summers, Mr Paul Volcker, and specifically Mr Rahm Emanuel (Wasserstein Perella & Co.) – may have been tainted, by the actions of previous Presidential Administrations since 1981, and, therefore, may require ”safeguards” that ensure the demise or that hinder the effectiveness of the “Private Funding Refunding Operation of the US Dollar”.

(g) That Mr Wilcox and Mr Cottrell believe the release of the aforementioned funds would demand a transparent Presidency and a country operating under the Rule of Law. Only a proper privately funded refunding with third party auditing – not the President’s Cabinet as the auditing party – will allow the US Dollar to regain its capitalization value and renew the world’s international trading markets with full disclosure and transparent regulation’. (5).

Source: Notarised Affidavit and statement of facts plus 43 pages of supporting documentation dated 29th December 2008 submitted by Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., 1157 West Street, Erie, PA 16502 to Christopher Story FRSA, Edward Harle Limited, dated 29th December 2008, for onward transmittal to sovereign authority.

Notes:

(1) Extracts from a timeline analysis of the background to the Criminal Finance Crisis associated with the Editor’s personal involvement: Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 3 & 4, pages 3-25: July 2009:

• 10 September 2001: The Editor’s fourth daughter, having travelled round the world and wound up in New York City, decides not to visit the Twin Towers in downtown New York with a friend early the following morning. Instead they take the Staten Island Ferry, from which she takes pictures of Manhattan, including the last known photographs of the Twin Towers before the abomination.

• 11 September 2001: The deliberate blowing up, with inside US Government connivance and foreign participation, of the Twin Towers on the precise 30th anniversary of the commencement of building work, and on the birthday of Feliks Djerzhinski, head of Lenin’s Cheka, shocks the world.

In the course of this ‘Reichstag Fire’ abomination, 658 staff at the offices of the broker Cantor Fitzgerald perish, along with a huge portfolio of trading contracts, while a large volume of gold is stolen from underground storage facilities owned by Bank of Nova Scotia. The Editor is physically unable to work creatively for three weeks after the shock of this abomination.

• 11-18 September 2001: Frantic efforts are made to evacuate our youngest daughter from New York City. Eventually, she travels by train to Boston, and manages to catch a liner to Southampton. Meanwhile our New York apartment is covered in a layer of grey filth. Eventually the carpet has to be discarded, and the place completely repainted as the walls and ceiling are filthy as well.

• Late October 2001: The Editor attends our New York office in Midtown Manhattan and notices an unpleasant smell. This smell pervades everything and it becomes fully clear that it is the smell of decaying flesh – the same stench that troops have reported over the centuries from battlefields. The stench is accompanied by the film of grey material, which blankets the office, requiring hours of deep cleaning. The stench remains throughout the Editor’s visit. People in the Midtown New York street seem accustomed to it, but the Editor can recall the smell to this day.

• February 2002: The Editor attends at the New York office and finds that the stench of rotting flesh has not gone away, although now it seems to depend on the direction of the wind. But it is still very noticeable and all-pervading.

• June 2002: The Editor is invited to a peculiar conference event in Washington DC convened by www.unansweredquestions.org. Briefed beforehand on this outfit, the Editor discovers that it is a controlled operation seeking to influence and manage the responses and behaviour of the 9/11 bereaved families of the murdered occupants of the Twin Towers. At this meeting, an operative dressed in bright red circulates with 30 portfolios containing inter alia photocopies of Federal Reserve print-outs showing colossal sums of money being remitted to various parties, including the then President of the United States, George Bush Sr., in 1992.

The annotator/auditor has written on the relevant sheet that receipt of emoluments by holders of office under the United States is illegal, and pointing out that George Bush Sr. has been receiving corrupt payments while serving as the President of the United States. The agent distributed these folders to 30 recipients, but not to the Editor, who asked for a set of the documents later, when a group of us met for drinks in the bar of the International Press Club, where the event was held. It later transpires that the folders were actually handed to intelligence community operatives, with the single exception of a set that was handed to a representative of Vanity Fair (which never used the material). The Agency therefore assumed that the information had been successfully clawed back and could therefore ‘do no harm’ (to the CIA).

• July 2002: The Editor contacts the agent and asks for a set of the documents (called the ‘FINS’) to be sent to him in London. These duly arrive about a week later. The Editor tsubsequently reviews the printouts, which turn out to be from a Federal Reserve Board master computer and show that the payments were remitted under the authority of Dr Alan Greenspan. Uncertain at first whether the documents were genuine or not, the Editor then pursues various lines of enquiry and continues with his normal workload.

• December 2002: The Editor concludes that the documents are genuine and resolves to expose them via our financial journal International Currency Review. The resulting issue, called our ‘first take’, is then prepared.

• March 2003: We publish International Currency Review, Volume 28, Number 4, which contains early analyses of these documents and accompanying materials, together with information about the ‘Black’ background of George H. W. Bush Sr. and assessments of the significance of the Federal Reserve print-outs, which carry indications on the top of the sheets to the effect that they were faxed originally by Lt. Delmart Mark Vreeland, whom we establish to be an ONI (Office of Naval Intelligence) operative.

• 19 March 2003: George W. Bush Jr. launches the illegal assault on Iraq and is caught on the White House video system punching his fists in the air and exclaiming ‘Feels good, feels good’. From now until early May, no one pays attention to anything at all beyond the war in Iraq.

At the outset, US Special Forces attack the Central Bank of Iraq and steal its gold, currency, paper assets and probably currency printing plates. The Special Forces engaged in this operation are then systematically liquidated, as uniquely reported by our services.

• Note: Our report on the attack on the Central Bank of Iraq, including the deliberate subsequent mass murder of the Special Forces operatives who carried out the attack, is being republished in International Currency Review, Volume 34, Numbers 3 & 4: pages F-37 to F-61 [July 2009].

It originally appeared in Volume 29, #1, on pages 33-58 [Summer 2003]. This analysis is apparently considered to be the classic report on the subject.

The assault on the Central Bank of Iraq was one of the key objectives, and enabled the White House to control a supposedly ‘independent’ financial institution, which could then be used as a key counterparty for exotic secret, and illicit, ‘Black’ financing purposes. When Mrs Hillary Clinton, a CIA operative, appeared in Baghdad in May 2009 to access the stolen Katrina funds which had been stashed in the Central Bank of Iraq, she was met by a Gold Badge who metaphorically placed his hand on her shoulder and told her she had been caught in flagrante trying to move the stolen Katrina funds. He also informed her that the funds had long since been retrieved. This episode reminds us how stupid these US financial operatives are: all such movements of funds are monitored and traced 24/7 using derivatives of the ‘see-through’ PROMIS software.

• Early May 2003: The Editor receives an unexpected phone call from ONI operative Lt. Delmart Mark Vreeland who, it later turns out, is ‘on the run’ and based in Yukon. Vreeland has somehow obtained a copy of International Currency Review, Volume 28, #4 (probably sent to him in Yukon by Gwendolyn Waymark: see below) and states that it is important that ‘we should meet’.

The Editor rashly agrees.

• Mid-May 2003: It is agreed that we will meet at McDonalds in the below-ground station area at Long Island Railroad station adjacent to Penn Station, New York. Vreeland asks the Editor to keep in touch throughout his journey and starts by asking him to make contact from Heathrow Airport. When contact is made, he asks the Editor to wire funds to him via Western Union from the airport, thus establishing a pattern of scamming behaviour that continues throughout the encounter, so that on the Editor’s return to London, he found that his Visa card had been scammed of £1,600.

On arrival in New York, the Editor is subjected to the usual operative technique of changing the venue, and is asked to take the next train to Niagara Falls, Canada, which he does. On arrival there, the Editor checks into a hotel and establishes that Vreeland is en route via Greyhound Bus from Yukon through Vancouver to Toronto and is approaching Toronto.

At a given moment Vreeland phones to say that the Editor should meet him in a shooting alley on Clifton Hill, the ghastly spectacle laid on for mindless visitors from the United States. Since the Editor knows what Vreeland looks like, he soon finds him in this location. Other details of this encounter can wait for the comprehensive exposé that is planned.

• It transpires that one of the sources of the FINS is indeed Vreeland himself, who, though an MK-ULTRA victim (split personality) and subject to necessary medication in order for the permanently warring ‘alters’ of his contrived multiple personality syndrome to remain under control, is lucid and extremely well informed and intelligent when examining the issue of our journal in some detail and explaining more about the geopolitical context. Thus Vreeland correctly reveals to the Editor that most of the world’s most serious problems can be attributed to George H. W. Bush Sr. who runs the German operation within the CIA and has the whole of the US Government in his grasp.

Vreeland, who predicted the 9/11 attacks from a Canadian jail cell in August 2001, also reveals that he had been sent to Moscow in December 2000 where he had managed to insert a Sony Playstation printed circuit inside a military installation, removing the circuit integrated inside the equipment.

He also related how his ‘partner’, the Canadian operative Marc Bastien, had been murdered after consuming a spiked drink in a Moscow bar, and that he (Vreeland) had couriered three diplomatic bags from Moscow to Toronto. (Obviously Vreeland may have been a suspect in this murder).

His story was that as he expected he would be ‘set up’, he had three dummy diplomatic bags, and when he was met at Toronto Airport by Russians, he handed them the empty bags and kept the US diplomatic bags, one of which he later opened (which is treason).

It remains unclear to us whether the Federal Reserve printouts were obtained from the opened diplomatic bag or from another source. Vreeland explains the role of Leo/Lee Wanta, an operative who, with his Chinese ‘partner’, Howie Kwong Kok, was said to have been extensively involved in Financial Warfare operations against the Soviet Union in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

Vreeland then threatened the Editor with death while the Editor was travelling back to New York from Niagara Falls, having ordered him to get off the train and to return to Canada, which the Editor refused to do (‘bait and switch’).

• Note: Following meetings and contact with a Pentagon-linked operative arranged by Gordon Thomas, this operative informed the Editor in March 2005 that ‘Vreeland is incarcerated for a very long time in solitary confinement, his case is closed, and he is no danger to you now’.

• May 2003: On returning to New York from Niagara Falls, the Editor finds a voicemail on his New York answerphone, from a Bush-linked operative, Gwendolyn Waymark. The message contains the warning: ‘None of this must ever come out, you understand’.

When an investigative journalist is addressed like that, the inevitable response is that a cover-up operation is in play and that, accordingly, further investigations are mandatory. By now the Editor suspected that the ‘national security’ cover was being used to mask immense corruption, stealing and exploitation of funds by corrupt elements within the US Government structures, and that he would accordingly do the opposite of what Waymark requested.

• July 2003: The Editor establishes the address of Wanta and travels by car to visit him, but there is no one at home due to the summer vacation period.

• May 2004: The Editor visits Leo Wanta out of the blue and is welcomed into the home, which belongs to a member of his family. Wanta is out of jail, to which he was consigned ostensibly for non-payment of $14,129 of Wisconsin State tax which he had in fact paid twice (in May and June 1992) as extensively described in our reports. The detail of the Wanta case will not be repeated here: it is all in the public domain, published in International Currency Review and on our website; and none of it has been challenged by any authority, although the Editor, who is now in possession of improved information, is now in a better position to amend any earlier misunderstandings which were due to inadequate data.

Very shortly after 9/11 (on 21st September 2001), Wanta is let out of jail and placed on probation, restricted to the State of Wisconsin. The fact that he was let out of jail within days of 9/11 is a relevant fact of crucial significance. Wanta had accumulated a vast number of offshore Executive Order 12333 US intelligence accounts holding colossal sums in cash, collateral and other assets, plus lock boxes containing diamonds and other items, ostensibly arising from the ransacking of the Soviet Union. However that was a convenient partial ‘cover story’.

• November 2004: The Editor is urged by Gordon Thomas, a veteran British journalist ‘with contacts within MI6’, to get in touch with the Pentagon-linked operative. The Editor refuses.

After further urging and statements by Thomas to the effect that ‘he has been vetted by MI6’, the Editor relents and an appointment is made for the Editor to contact the agent in the fishing tackle section of a sports store on Fifth Avenue, New York City. As in a tradecraft movie, the Editor finds this man, complete with spook’s raincoat, ostensibly examining fishing rods at the back end of the store. This agent takes the Editor to the Algonquin Hotel and plies him with Coca Cola, while very evidently recording everything that the Editor says. He asks questions concerning Vreeland, and the Editor informs him that Vreeland is a multiple personality disorder MK-ULTRA Illuminati victim trained to respond to trigger phrases (i.e. there would be a sequence which would trigger his role as an assassin). The agent later uses the Editor to extract from him detailed information about the two Soviet ships that left the Iraqi port of Umm Qasr in February 2003, carrying most physical traces of weapons of mass destruction manufacture and assembly.

• The agent sent repeated email requests for more information on this subject, which the Editor compiled from his own open sources and from the Soviet military Intelligence (GRU) website!

• December 2004: During a visit by the Editor to Gordon Thomas in Bath, Thomas reveals that MI6 has disseminated lies about the Editor to the gullible British press (a matter extensively reviewed by us elsewhere). Specifically, it has been suggested to the British media that the Editor had been involved in the aborted Equatorial Guinea venture with Mark Thatcher, a fanciful piece of make-believe – whereas of course the Editor has done nothing else at all since 1970 but work 24/7 on our publications. Gordon Thomas indicates that ‘with a new Bush Administration in power, Washington has asked MI6 what they intend to do about Mr Story’ (i.e., would they please take steps to bring this confounded investigative journalist under control, as he is causing us a great deal of trouble: by which was meant that he is thought likely to expose our serial criminality. How right they were).

• March 2005: After a meeting in Washington, DC, with the Pentagon-linked agent, who, having asked for copies of our publications which he said he would pay for but never did, and who had seemed most annoyed when the Editor showed him the further issues of the journal containing detailed elaborations of this financial research, the Pentagon agent telephoned the Editor in London and asked him questions about ‘our arrangements with Bernie Ecclestone in Monaco’ about which the Editor knew nothing whatsoever.

After listening to this for several minutes, the Editor said: ‘I have no idea what you are talking about. You had better go back to your source’. The agent was silent for some time and then said: ‘That is worrying in view of where this comes from’ (i.e. MI6). When the Editor had ‘joined up the dots’, he telephoned Gordon Thomas and in an extended conversation, which has since been published, he asked him why MI6 thought they could disseminate craven lies and get away with it. To this, Thomas uttered his notorious response: ‘It doesn’t matter that it’s not true. All that matters is that it’s out there’. He then explained… ‘They probably think you’re dangerous because you’ve got the documents and you control your own publications and no-one can tell you what to do’.

• Dangerous TO WHOM? Again, as with the Waymark intervention, this represented a clear signal that the investigations must continue, come what may.

• March 2005: At Wanta’s suggestion, the Editor visits Richmond, VA, to meet the Düsseldorf-born Steven Goodwin, one of Wanta’s (CIA) Attorneys. (Wanta, by the way, always answers the phone in German: ‘Guten Tag’). The Editor buys Goodwin a dinner, during which Goodwin explains that he has negotiated an agreement with the Wisconsin State Department of Corrections for Wanta’s probation to be shortened on payment of a certain sum of money by way of ‘Restitution’.

The amount in question is over $30,000 [see detailed background: www.worldreports.org: Archive: 6th August 2007]. In retrospect it was clear that Mr Goodwin was suggesting subliminally that the Editor should come up with the funds in question. The amount would consist of a third (completely irregular as the Editor later discovered) payment of the original $14,129 plus interest, plus fees.

• April 2005: The Editor decides, after a great deal of thought, to proceed with payment of the $35,000 and identifies private funds obtained from a successful sale of our private central London property. Goodwin is asked to prepare the necessary loan documents.

• May 2005: The Editor visits Wanta again and spends longer in his Wisconsin location, updating his understanding of Wanta’s rôle as custodian of the innumerable offshore bank accounts linked to his Financial Warfare operations against the USSR in conjunction with Howie Kwong Kok.

However these accounts are now believed to represent depositories of Fraudulent Finance operations conducted on behalf of the Bush Crime Syndicate. The loan documents that Goodwin should have sent never materialised, until the Editor’s final day in New York, when they suddenly appear (after ostensibly having been sent no less than three times previously).

• 10 June 2005: The Editor visits Wanta in Wisconsin and Wanta sticks the loan documents on the table essentially with the command: ‘Sign here’. Taken aback, the Editor wonders whether to leave immediately without signing, but decides instead to sign, having ‘come this far’. The Editor then buys Wanta lunch and dinner.

• June-July 2005: The Editor deliberately delays to see whether this would cause Wanta problems, and sure enough he is badgered on the phone by Wanta on several occasions. Finally the Editor sends a bank draft for $35,000 to Goodwin with instructions on what he is to do with the funds, which have been provided on a loan basis at 7.0% for two years, repayable in full with interest on 11th June 2007. Goodwin then drags his feet and initially resists the Editor’s sharp request that he travel to Wisconsin to obtain the necessary receipt from the Department of Corrections.

Finally, after being ordered up to Wisconsin by the Editor, he goes there, and obtains a receipt (demanded by the Editor) dated 21st July 2005 plus a computer print-out the following day stating that no further funds are owed.

• July-November 2005: Notwithstanding that the payments have been made, Wanta’s probation is not shortened as was agreed by Goodwin with the Department of Corrections, until 14th November 2005 (following a delay of four months), when a formal document signed by a Mr Matthew J. Frank, Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections, emerges confirming that Wanta has been given an unconditional discharge (purchased with the Editor’s loan funds).

This shortened his probation by five years and two weeks. Goodwin should then arguably have obtained a dispensation from the Court deleting Wanta’s status as a felon which he did not do.

[The Editor wrote to Wisconsin Judge James Martin on 17th October 2007 (see website Archive report dated 27th October 2007) under ‘Misprision of Felony’ drawing his attention to the extreme proven irregularities perpetrated by the Wisconsin Department of Corrections summarised in the website report dated 6th August 2007: see Archive]

• December 2005: Dr Alan Greenspan and the US Treasury Secretary, John Snow, travel to China where they ostensibly enter into negotiations with Chinese parties including probably Howie Kwong Kok concerning the release of ‘Wanta funds’.

• 15-16 March 2006: The Editor visits Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., in Erie, Pennsylvania, arriving in the middle of the night amid a snowstorm. No taxis were available at the old Amtrak station, and the Editor walked several miles in the pitch dark without the slightest idea of where he was.

Eventually a cab crammed full of people stopped at some traffic lights. The Editor hailed the full taxi, and the driver said he would return in 40 minutes. At the subsequent meetings, Michael Cottrell outlined the Private Sector Refunding Programme for the US Dollar which the Editor described in outline in the forgoing Affidavit dated 29th December 2009.

• 18 March 2006: Visiting Goodwin at Richmond for a second time, the Editor is party to a special conference call to Coutts Bank, London, involving Goodwin, the Editor, Wanta, and Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., who was then Treasurer and Executive Vice President of Wanta’s AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., registered in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Asking for Mrs Burgess, whom the Editor had met at Coutts earlier, Goodwin was put through to a Mr Robertson who said that Coutts did not have a relationship with Mr Wanta, which contradicted information in our possession.

The purpose of the telephone call had been to arrange for the Editor, equipped with a very limited (information only) Power of Attorney, to visit Coutts Bank with Goodwin in early April 2006 to inspect assets held by specific ‘Wanta’ corporations at Coutts and to report accordingly. Robertson denied that the bank had any banking relationship with Wanta and the call, which was listened to by many agencies, was terminated, after the Editor had stated that he was engaged in research into stolen funds for publication in our journal International Currency Review.

• Late April 2006: Equipped with the limited Power of Attorney, furnished by Goodwin on Wanta’s instructions, the Editor visited Lloyds Bank, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, to meet the Manager in order to be informed about specific accounts ‘owned’ by Wanta, so as to report back.

The manager went away and returned with the information that the accounts had been shifted into the PERSONAL name of Jan Morton Heger, one of Wanta’s ‘former’ CIA Attorneys.

• Late April 2006: Wanta, now free to travel outside Wisconsin thanks to the Edsitor’s loan money, suddenly travelled to California where he was briefed by CIA operatives. When he returned, the previous intention of collecting all the assets for repatriation to the United States appeared to have been abandoned and Wanta spoke instead of $4.5 trillion that was to be brought over from China, which was ostensibly to represent his compensation for ‘wrongful imprisonment’ and for what he had done in executing Financial Warfare instructions issued by Reagan directly to him.

• May 2006: The $4.5 trillion was duly delivered in good faith by People’s Bank of China, into the custody of Bank of America, Richmond, VA. It was ostensibly supposed to be paid over to Wanta and/or his corporation in June 2006, which came and went with no such payment.

• June 2006: John Snow is suddenly replaced by the former CEO of Goldman Sachs, Henry M. Paulson Jr., who has the $4.5 trillion transferred to a Goldman Sachs account with Citibank and, according to our best information and belief, later places the $4.5 trillion into contract for trading purposes for one year, behind Wanta’s back. As Treasury Secretary, he nevertheless retains sole signatory control over the $4.5 trillion, which on the face of it represents a grotesque abuse of power and conflict of interest – a point that we subsequently emphasise in our web reports. Paulson should have been impeached for this transgression.

• July 2006: The official US disinformation machine gets into full gear, with its first lie focused on ‘expectations’ that the $4.5 trillion would be paid on 31st July, which does not happen.

At this stage, the Editor’s website platform starts to be used by Leo Wanta to run a campaign to ‘embarrass’ the US authorities into paying over Wanta’s $4.5 trillion. Details of this de facto campaign are omitted here, as they are decisively on the record on our website Archive and in successive issues of International Currency Review.

• 02 September 2006: The Editor publishes a macroeconomic assessment outlining the benefits which will follow payment and the use of the ‘Wanta’ funds for Refunding purposes, which is what has been agreed by the G-7 Group of financial powers [see Note (5) below]. Moreover HM the Queen was reported to have told the G-7 participants in June 2006 that the $ Refunding had to proceed ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’ – revealing that Buckingham Palace has access to the very best macroeconomic advice in the world.

The Editor’s report also predicts the consequences of not implementing ‘The G-7-Approved Refunding Plan’. The predictions contained in that report pre-dated macroeconomic reports by self-appointed ‘gurus’ who now say that they were the first to predict what has happened accurately.

• September 2006 to March 2007: The de facto website report ‘campaign’ achieves worldwide fame and is magnified when French intelligence disseminate the reports to innumerable outlets, giving us a per-report readership estimated at one stage as high as nearly 50 million.

• December 2006: We report that Henry M. Paulson, US Treasury Secretary, is arrested in Germany. This report, which we knew to be accurate, was laughed to scorn by observers for a few days until knowledgeable sources whispered in the background that it was accurate. Mr Paulson was later exfiltrated from German custody aboard a British plane and dumped at the Washington Cathedral for the prolonged memorial service for President Ford, in early January 2007.

• 29-30 March 2007: Without any warning, the British banking system closes down. The Editor becomes aware of this when attempting to refill a mobile telephone pay-as-you-go arrangement using a VISA card. Over the next few weeks it transpires that gold assets belonging to the British monarchy have been hijacked or stolen or diverted while the British banking system was closed down to the outside world and to the general public. The heist was perpetrated by insiders within the Bank of England and elsewhere, working with corrupt US counterparts. In due course, the Editor publishes this information on the website.

• April 2007: The Editor publishes a warning that information obtained from Vreeland in October 2004 when he warned a contact of the Editor for the Editor’s information that an atrocity was intended in the Twin Cities of Minneapolis-St Paul, Minnesota, could refer to the Republican National Convention planned to start in the Twin Cities on 1st September 2008.

The Editor is later informed that an atrocity focused on the Twin Cities may have been aborted as a consequence (Note: The ‘Dark Forces’ have a hang-up about twins: Twin Towers, Twin Cities. 1st September 2008 also devolves kabbalistically to 9/11, which would have been a relevant factor as these people are hooked by such esoteric Babylonian-originated numerology). The Editor is also separately informed much later that our website forced another Bush II Administration ‘inside job’ atrocity – a planned nuclear explosion on American soil – to be aborted.

• 15 May 2007: The Editor informs a previously cooperative US contact of what he knows about the stealing of The Queen’s gold. The contact, lacking information, says: ‘I find that hard to believe’. The Editor says: ‘If you don’t believe what I say then don’t bother to contact me again’, and severs the contact. This came as a shock to the handling ‘structures’, which then took ‘special measures’ to have the agent removed from the scene. This was an unfortunate and unintended consequence of the ongoing US deceptions.

• 19-20 June 2007: The Bank of England sends $6.2 trillion of sovereign LOAN funds to Bank of New York Mellon for use to fund the Dollar Refunding Program after it has become apparent that the $4.5 trillion sent over by the People’s Bank of China in May 2006 ostensibly to finance Leo Wanta’s Settlement and the ‘Wanta Plan’ Refinancing operation, has been hijacked and diverted/stolen for illicit trading purposes to finance the US Intelligence Power’s ‘Black’ finance budget, to keep the criminal banking enterprises afloat, and for official and intermediary self-enrichment purposes. Instead of acting as a pass-through institution, BoNY Mellon hijacks the funds, which are then exploited ruthlessly until mid-September 2008.

Source: Excerpted from Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 3 & 4: July 2009. The actual complete timeline is much more extensive than is cited here.

(2) Banks identified by the Editor of this service from open domain documents we retain, as holding ‘Wanta’ (‘Bush Syndicate’) illicit funds (which, when ‘accepted’ by US authority, are ‘laundered via the sovereign’ and thereby legitimised):

AB Invest [Avenue Banque]
ABN-AMRO Bank N.V., Amsterdam,
Agape Holdings, Ltd, Barbados
Agricultural Bank of China
Algemene Spaar-en Lufrentenkas
Algemene Spaar-en Lufrentenkas/ASLK Bank
Altalanos Eriekforgalmi Bank Rt (AEB RT)
Amsouth Bank, N.A
Amur Commercial Bank, Moscow
Anglo Manx Bank Limited
Arab Jordan Investment Bank
Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Limited, Melbourne
Bacob Savings Bank, Borgerhout, Belgium
Banca di Roma, Rome
Banca Nazionale del Lavoro
Banco Ambrosiano Veneto
Banco Espanol de Credito, S.A., Madrid
Banco Espirito Santo e Comerciale de Lisboa, Lisbon
Banco Exterior de Espana, Madrid
Banco Hispano Americano
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas
Bank ‘UKRAINA’, Kiev, Ukraine
Bank Bruxelles Lambert
Bank Crozier Limited, Grenada [closed down, money stolen*]
Bank Dumesnil, Geneva
Bank for Foreign Economic Affairs of the USSR, Moscow
Bank of America
Bank of America International, New York
Bank of America, Milan
Bank of America, Newport Beach, CA
Bank of America, Vienna, Austria
Bank of China
Bank of New York, New York
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd, Tokyo
Bank Union de Crédit
Bankers Trust GmbH, Frankfurt
Banque Nationale de Paris
Banque Paribas (Luxembourg) S.A
Banque SCS ALLIANCE Geneva
Banque Suisse de Crédit et de Dépôts, Zürich
Barclays Bank, Hanover Square, London
CBI-TDB Union Bancaire Privée, Geneva
Chase Manhattan Bank N.A., London,
Chase Manhattan Bank, Milan
Chase Manhattan Bank, New York
Chase Manhattan Bank, Vienna
Chemical Bank of New York
Citibank – Frankfurt
Citibank – Geneva
Citibank – Los Angeles
Citibank – Milan
Citibank – New York
Citibank – Singapore
Citibank – Tokyo
Citibank – Vienna, Austria
Citibank, N.A., Philippines
Citicorp/Citibank
Citicorp/Citibank, London, Painewebber, Inc
Clydesdale Bank Plc
Commercial Bank ‘Moldova-Agroindbank’, S.A., Kishinev
Coutts Bank (Switzerland) Ltd
Coutts Bank, London
Crédit Lynonnais Bank Nederland NV, Amsterdam
Crédit Suisse Bank
Crédit Suisse Bank, Geneva
Crédit Suisse Bank, Lausanne
Crédit Suisse First Boston, Zürich
Credobank (Commercial Bank)
DBS Bank/Development Bank of Singapore: This bank was closed down by the authorities
and $70 billion was stolen in the process. The existing institution is a ‘phoenix’.
Dean Witter Reynolds
Den Norske Bank AS, Oslo
Deutsche Bank, Düsseldorf
Dresdner Bank, Frankfurt
Faroe Investments
FIDENAS AG, Zürich, Switzerland
Générale de Banque
Gosbank, USSR
Handels Bank AG, Zürich
Handelsbank Natwest, Zürich
Hansabank, Talinn, Estonia
Joint Stock Bank ‘Kazkommertsbank’, Almaty
Jugobanka D.D
Lloyds Bank Plc
Lloyds Bank Plc, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire
[Funds placed in the personal name of his former Attorney Jan Morton Heger]
Manufacturers Hanover Corporation/Mantrust
Marshall and Ilsley Bank
Merita Bank, Helsinki
Merrill Lynch Inc
Midland Bank Plc, London
Morgan Guaranty & Trust Bank, New York
Morgan Stanley and Co, New York
Morgan Stanley Asia Ltd, Hong Kong
Moscow Cooperative Bank ‘Partner’ Bank
Moscow Narodny Bank Ltd, Singapore
Mosstrolbank, AmeriTrust Corporation Inc.
National Bank for Foreign Economic Activity of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent,
National Westminster Bank
National Westminster Bank of New Jersey
National Westminster Bank Plc., Herne Bay, Kent
Nomura Singapore Limited
Nordbanken AB, Stockholm
Northern Trust International Banking Corporation
Norwest Bank, N.A
Ost-West Handelsbank, Frankfurt
Painewebber, Inc
Paribas (Suisse) S.A., Geneva
Philadelphia International Bank
Prudential Securities, New York
Raffeisen Zentralbank Osterreich, Vienna
Raffeisenbank Appenzell
Rafffeisen Zentralbank Osterreich AG [RBZ], Singapore
Relvnesheconombank, Minsk
Rigas Komerc Banka, Riga, Latvia
Royal Bank of Scotland Plc
Royal Trust Bank
Sanwa Bank Limited
Sanwa Bank Lt, Düsseldorf
Schweizerische Bankgesellshaft /Union Bank of Switzerland
Security Pacific Asia Bank, Ltd
Shearson Lehman Hutton Inc., Denver
Société Générale, Paris
Société Générale, Riga, Latvia
Southwest Securities, Inc
Standard Chartered Bank, Philippines
State Bank for Foreign Economic Affairs for Turkmenistan
Status-Credit Bank, Moscow
Swiss Banking Corporation
Swiss Volksbank, Zürich
Texas Commerce Bank, Dallas
Toronto Dominion Bank
Unibank A.S., Copenhagen
Union Bank of Switzerland, Geneva
Union Bank of Switzerland, Zürich
Vilniaus Bank AS, AB, Vilnius, Lithuania
Volksbank, Bonn, Germany
Volksbank, Offerdingen, Germany
Westdeutsche Landesbank, Düsseldorf, Germany
Zentralsparkasse und Kommerzialbank, Vienna.

* ONI operative Vreeland informed the Editor that he was among four agents who flew down to Grenada to investigate Bank Crozier after a huge theft from the bank was reported in the late 1990s. The theft was perpetrated by CIA operative Hillary Clinton, now the US Secretary of State. Vreeland reported that when the agents entered the bank, they established that the bank’s video system, which kept a visual record of everyone entering the premises, was blank during the period when Mrs Clinton attended at the institution. She reportedly stole a colossal sum of money.

We have separately reported that when Mrs Clinton visited Baghdad in May 2009, ostensibly to hold a ‘town meeting’, but in fact to access the Katrina funds stolen inter alia by the Clintons and hidden at the Central Bank of Iraq (which has been under direct ‘White House control’ since the invasion), she was greeted by a US Gold Badge who metaphorically placed a heavy hand on her shoulder and said: ‘You’ve been caught in flagrante, Mrs Clinton. And furthermore, the stolen Katrina funds have been retrieved’. It is believed that on this occasion, the bank’s video system was functioning perfectly normally.

• Unsurprisingly, Mrs Clinton was reported on 15th July to be suffering from a ‘broken elbow’. Normally gangster enforcement operatives briefed to maim but not to kill, would go for the knee-caps. But we imagine that a broken elbow would be agony too.

Source: International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 1 & 2, pages 168-171 and pages 331-332 [Third Quarter 2007]: website Archive reports: 30 December 2006 and 11 June 2007. Very self-evidently, some of these institutions have long since been absorbed into other institutions, have been rebranded, or have otherwise become successor organisations. Comprehensive details and facsimiles of the ACTUAL TRANSACTIONS, BANK ACCOUNTS AND COORDINATES, were published in International Currency Review, Volume 31, 3/4 [December 2006].

(3) Although there are many thousands of CIA proprietary US Government intelligence corporations, those with which Wanta was connected include:

Amberhaven Limited, Switzerland.
AmeriChina Global Management Group Ltd., US.
AmeriChina-Philippines Corporation, Philippines.
AmeriTrust (Suisse) S.A., Switzerland.
AmeriTrust Corporation, Canada.
AmeriTrust Corporation, Inc., United States.
Aneko Credit Pte Limited, Singapore.
Asian-Europa Development Limited, Singapore.
Cataract, Inc., United States.
Dagin Investment Corporation*.
Forum Construction S.A.*.
Galloping Ghost Ltd.*
Glister Mount Limited, Hong Kong.
Leo E. Wanta and Associates, Inc., United States.
Marvelous Investments Limited, British Virgin Islands.
Marvelous Investments Limited, United States.
MiApollo Investments Limited, Hong Kong.
MiApollo Productions Inc, United States.
Mitre Corporation, Inc.*, United States [MIT].
New Republic Air (Bahamas) Limited, Bahamas.
New Republic/USA Financial Group, Ltd., G.mbH, Vienna.
Patriarch Corporation, Malaysia.
Quarterhouse, Ltd., United States.
Ramo Manufacturing Co., Inc., United States.
Regency Catering, Inc., United States.
RUSS, Russian Federation
Tockton Enterprises, Inc.*.
Trans-Asia Global Resources, Singapore.
Vendor Leasing Services, Inc., United States.
White Cloud Petroleum Corporation, Delaware, US.

* Country of incorporation uncertain.

These CIA/DIA corporations conduct(ed) business, earned substantial profits, received assets, maintained bank accounts, duly filed ‘economic reports’ with the General Accounting Office (GAO), borrowed money, paid back loans, and operated ‘day-to-day businesses’.

Our usage of the past tense here merely reflects the documents in our possession from which these observations were derived, and does not preclude the fact that most of these corporations (and thousands of others) remain operative, even though trillions of dollars lodged therein have been diverted.

In the spring of 1992 an audit of CIA corporations’ assets and activities was carried out by the Hong Kong office of Price Waterhouse. The upshot was that the auditor certified that the total value of currencies, gold, precious gems and other assets THEN held by these and certain other (unnamed) Title 18, Section 6 USG companies amounted to $864,000,000,000. Source: International Currency review, Volume 31, Numbers 3 & 4, pages 190-191 [Fourth Quarter 2006].

(4) See: Soviet Analyst, Volume 29, Number 7, May 2005, page 8.

((5) Excerpts from our prediction of what would happen if the Refunding Programme (previously labelled by us ‘The Wanta Plan’) were not to be implemented expeditiously: published first on 2nd September 2006 and again on 3rd-4th December 2006 [see this website’s Archive for those dates]. Source: International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 1 & 2, pages 299-302 [Third Quarter 2007]. For this presentation, the phrase ‘The Wanta Plan’ (which, like ‘Wantagate’, we invented) is replaced by ‘The G-7-Approved Refunding Plan’.

THE GRIM CONSEQUENCES OF ABORTING THE WANTA PLAN:

Not implementing The G-7-Approved Refunding Plan will have the consequences indicated below, among many others. The primary assumption underlying what follows is that a wholly irrational and by now shambolic, terminal free-for-all has developed in which the myriad competing parties seek their own advantage, without regard for the broader consequences – or if they have any regard for them, place them on one side while they cynically pursue their own interests first.

• To begin with, the entire mass of the international financial community knows about this crisis – and that the American authorities have lied, double-crossed and deceived from the outset, that the Full Faith and Credit of the United States and the Rule of Law in America have collapsed, and that Bush II Administration officials are behaving like a bunch of arrogant Chicago gangsters who believe that because the intimidated ‘mainstream‘ media have failed to pick this story up, they are protected from the consequences of their serial criminality and duplicity.

• The consequences of blocking The G-7-Approved Refunding Plan itemised below are NOT dependent, as the White House may have presumed, upon the continued suppression of this crisis by the controlled US and UK ‘mainstream‘ media. On the contrary, the ‘mainstream‘ media, which is being constantly updated on the crisis, is liable to be caught off-balance by the devastating global consequences of the Bush II White House continuing to block this beneficial Settlements. Put another way, ‘they won‘t know what has hit them‘, and they will have to scramble to catch up.

• Institutions in the United States and abroad teetering on the brink of insolvency due to the severe financial knock-on effects of the US authorities‘ duplicity in failing to implement their undertakings and obligations concerning The G-7-Approved Refunding Plan, will go to the wall.

• The Communist Chinese increase the volume of oil traded in currencies other than the US dollar, following reports from New Delhi and elsewhere (in late August 2006) that such transactions had already started. With the failure of scheduled payments by the American authorities, implying clearly that the US dollar payments system has ceased to function and cannot be relied upon, the
Chinese Communists decide that they have nothing to lose by switching from the US dollar for oil payments to other currencies.

• The US dollar collapses by 50% or more. Since other key currencies are now in greater demand, because they are needed for oil payments purposes, their massive appreciations reflecting the US dollar‘s steep devaluation are, if anything, exacerbated further, given this sudden new demand.

• Since many US imports, including of course oil, continue to be in demand domestically, US price inflation escalates sharply, followed by interest rates. Indeed interest rates chase inflation upwards.

• The US housing sector, already in implosion mode, shifts into free-fall, housing starts collapse, and large swathes of the US economy follow downwards into unknown territory.

• Unemployment rises steeply, placing added burdens on the welfare sector which have further cumulative adverse financial consequences.

• The steep devaluation of the US dollar boosts US exports over time, in due course bringing about sharp reductions and then the disappearance of the country‘s $1 trillion annual trade deficit. This process, however, is subject to the so-called J-curve effect, whereby the foreign trade deficit worsens sharply to begin with, given that essential imports in the pipeline cannot be cancelled and still have to be paid for with steeply devalued dollars. It is only when these overhang transactions have been unwound, which can take years, depending on the volume of forward import contracts placed, that the beneficial effects of the dollar‘s massive devaluation start
to rebalance the country‘s external accounts.

• The deficit on the current account takes longer to eliminate because the outstanding US debt continues to exist and has to be paid off with steeply devalued dollars when surpluses appear on the balance-of-payments, which again may take several years. The immediate impact of the steep devaluation is therefore greatly to exacerbate the US domestic recession or depression brought about by the other adverse knock-on effects mentioned.

• Within a short space of time, Western economies, in particular, find that their exports cannot compete, and their steep currency appreciations, while curbing inflation and probably delivering price deflation, leave exporting companies unable to compete, forced to lay off staff or to close down altogether because their overall operations have become loss-making or uneconomic.

There will be much blood on corporate boardroom carpets, and much wailing and gnashing of teeth.

• The US and all other stock markets experience a slump with no historical precedent, which triggers bankruptcies throughout the business and personal sectors, throwing very large numbers of families into distress and inducing a sharp jump in the suicide statistics both in the United States and abroad. Foreclosures escalate, as do factory and corporate closures and failures.

• The stock market slump and knock-on consequences in related financial markets spread like a malicious contagion worldwide, with unpredictable outcomes universally conducive to an initial global slump.

• Chaotic currency realignments proliferate. If one underlying globalist intention had been to exploit this developing crisis to ‘call for‘ a world currency, this project, like all such globalist forward planning and conspiracies, turns out to be a monumental failure

Instead, what has been achieved is that:

• The world currency, financial and trading systems rapidly disintegrate, leading to the worldwide imposition of foreign trade tariffs and to a parallel ferocious, no-holds-barred, ruthless scramble for global energy resources that is far more intense than the current scramble, with extreme dangers for humanity.

• The criminal kleptocracy congratulates itself on having brought about the revolutionary collapse that their mad ideology requires, on the demented model of breaking everything up and rebuilding from the rubble. But like the hideous wars that these mad people instigate, ‘the law of unintended consequences‘ kicks in, and they wind up destroying their massive wealth and themselves, along with everyone else: THE SAMPSON OPTION.

Not very clever.

Note: July 2009: Of course, not all these predictions made on 2nd September 2006 and repeated on 3-4 December 2007 have yet come to pass. But many of them have!

• The resolution, compliant with the Rule of Law, has been ‘set in stone’, which will have the effect that the total collapse is averted in the nick of time, provided that the sabotage operations cease (uncertain at this posting) – and thanks exclusively to the impressive strength of character of the most important and powerful sovereign human being alive in the world today.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

WAR OF ATTRITION AGAINST THE U.S. CRIME CADRES

DOLLAR REFUNDING OPERATION TO PROCEED FROM LONDON

Monday 8 June 2009 02:00

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

• POSSIBLE RATIONALE FOR AIR FRANCE 447 DISASTER

• BLOWS RAIN DOWN UPON THE CRIMINAL ELEMENTS

• BUSH SR. AND BARBARA TOLD TO PACK FOR JAIL

• GEORGE W. BUSH REPORTED TO BE ‘ON SUICIDE[D?] WATCH’

• SENIOR U.S. ARMY AND AIR FORCE PERSONNEL ARRESTED

• KISSINGER ACCOMPANIED BY TWO INTERPOL AGENTS

• EARLIER INTELLIGENCE RECEIVED [DIARY FORMAT]

• DISCONNECT AT THE U.S. TREASURY

• IN BEIJING, GEITHNER TOUTED A ‘PAULSON’-STYLE $4T CONTRACT

• CHINESE SAID: ‘THE MONEY’S COMPROMISED: GET OUT’

• ‘MAINSTREAM’ NOW USING THE WORD ‘CRIMINAL’

• PERVERSE INTENT TO REVIVE AND CONTINUE THE FRAUDULENT FINANCE CAROUSEL

• MACROFINANCIAL ASSESSMENT AND PROSPECTS

• FOREIGN CREDITORS ARE CUTTING THEIR LOSSES

• POLICY DECISIONS WITHOUT THE MISSING INPUT

• INDICATORS OF GLOBAL DEFLATION

• CHENEY’S NEWSMAX OPERATION CLOSED DOWN?

• The Subs/Books Update Panel on the Home Page was updated at 8:00pm UK time on 22nd May 2009 to provide comprehensive details of all issues of our intelligence services published during the first five months of 2009, including the latest issue of our Global Analyst (Volume 3, #2). Soviet Analyst, Volume 31, #1 is ‘on machine’ at our print works and will be delivered soon. It will contain proof that the Soviet Union remains in existence, or certainly did as late as March 2001, a decade after it was said to have vanished into the trashcan of history. No surprise, but nice to prove it.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice are comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor’s study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing global financial corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Just press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

• The Editor’s $35,000 Wanta bail-out money has been stolen.

• See the second white panel for details of our latest distributed intelligence publications.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the Internet Security Solution software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and our ‘politically incorrect’ intelligence books online from this website.

THE SOLUTION TO THE CRISIS THAT HAS BEEN AVAILABLE ALL ALONG:
Operating the $ Refunding from London without US Government participation delivers:

(1) Massive ongoing windfall tax accruals to the BRITISH Treasury given that all funds resident in the United Kingdom jurisdiction for 24 hours are taxable by the Inland Revenue. This makes the UK Refunding proposal of extreme interest to Her Majesty’s Government and the UK Treasury.

((2) Massive ongoing windfall benefits to the UNITED STATES Treasury given that it will also receive a cascade of tax accruals from this independent private sector Refunding Program.

(3) The necessary refinancing of the UK and US banking systems ON THE BOOKS with no input from either Government and NO CORRESPONDING DEBT CREATED IN THE BACKGROUND.

(4) GOOD (i.e., on-balance sheet, taxed) money which will CHASE OUT THE BAD MONEY that the crass US Fraudulent Finance concoction will generate.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

POSSIBLE RATIONALE FOR AIR FRANCE 447 DISASTER
Initially, French authorities reacting to the loss of Air France 447 on Monday 1st June with 228 people on board, suggested that the aircraft had broken up in the course of a terrible electrical storm. Later, they conspicuously refrained from ruling out sabotage.

By the weekend of 6-7 June, it was being reported that the huge oil slick that had been identified earlier was now thought not to have been associated with the disappearance of the Airbus A330. If an explosion took place, there would be no oil slick.

On the other hand, since the oil in question was diesel oil, reports that a diesel-powered submarine may have launched a missile at the aircraft, as happened with TWA-800, when an Iranian submarine was suspected, are not to be dismissed – especially as France despatched a nuclear submarine to the area – we speculate, to search for the submarine in order to establish whether it was German or Iranian. The Iranians would have a motive, as France under President Sarkozy has ceased supply Iran with plutonium for its nuclear programme.

If the Iranians have demonstrated that they can destroy a French airliner, they could do so again. On the other hand, if the submarine is one of the German refurbished diesel fleet, the immediate consequences for the already (see previous reports) fractured Franco-German alliance, based on the timeless Treaty of the Elysée of January 1963, could be momentous.

Tensions between France, the United States, Germany and Britain are at an all-time high due to the chaotic and hideous struggle over the money, which has progressively eroded and destabilised all dimensions of these powers’ bilateral and broader relationships.

In the absence of an official list of passengers, we were able during the week ending 5th June to establish that passengers included Eric Heine, a senior executive of the German steel corporation Thyssen-Krupp, several executives from Michelin’s South American operations, and a 25-year-old relative of Portuguese Royalty.

On 2nd June it emerged that Michael ‘Butch’ Harris, a top geologist with Oklahoma City-based Devon Energy Corporation and his wife Anne, had been on the aircraft. A spokesman for the company, Chip Minty, confirmed that Harris was a geologist working out of Devon’s Rio de Janeiro office. The late Mr Harris had moved to Brazil from Houston in July 2008, according to Mrs Harris’s sister, Mary Riley, of Lafayette, LA, in an interview with the local newspaper, The Advertiser. The couple, married for 16 years, were originally from Lafayette and had lived there until 2004.

Mr Harris was a Clemson graduate and a brilliant geologist. The ‘Jack 2’ well drilled in the Walker Ridge area of the Gulf of Mexico 175 miles off the coast of Louisiana, is located in about 7,000 ft. of water. Chevron, which has a 50% stake in the oilfield, has two partners for this project, both of which have a 25% stake: Statoil ASA (Norway), and Devon Energy Corporation of Oklahoma City.

Fadel Gheit, an analyst with Oppenheimer & Co., said on 4th June that ‘relative to its size, Devon has one of the greatest exposures to the deepwater Gulf of Mexico’. Devon’s shares rose by about 15% on the New York Stock Exchange following news about the ‘Jack 2’ oilfield.

Before moving to Brazil, Michael ‘Butch’ Harris and his wife Anne lived in the Woodlands area of Houston, which ‘just happens’ to be where George Herbert Walker Bush lives.

We ‘speculate’ that Mr Harris was en route from Rio de Janeiro to Paris where he was to realise a brief from Bush Sr. to leverage Devon Energy Corporation’s 25% stake in the ‘Jack 2’ oilfield with the corrupt ‘Kissinger-Bush’ bank, Paribas, for an enormous credit line, enabling the desperate Bush Crime Family to ‘start over’ with a pile of cash for the usual leveraging and hypothecation purposes. We further ‘speculate’ that Air France 447 was sabotaged, to close off this option.

That George Bush Sr. would have no compunction in arranging for one of his associates to run the risk of being murdered in mid-air given that the whole world (with the sole exception of the crime network’s remaining cornered assets) is intent upon removing the Bush Crime Family from the chessboard, goes without saying.

The sole motivation of this criminal group operating outside and within the US Intelligence Power, the White House and the Treasury, has all along been to retain control of the levers of Fraudulent Finance at all costs, without regard for collateral damage. Given the unconscionable level of their arrogance, these people never expected to encounter any opposition to their activities, and have accordingly received the overdue shock of their lives.

BLOWS RAIN DOWN UPON THE CRIMINAL ELEMENTS
Among the most recent shocks applied to these criminal operatives, the following developments were confirmed to us on 5th June and have subsequently been spontaneously reconfirmed twice:

• Bush 41, Clinton 42 and Bush 43 and US Chief Justice John Roberts were told that they would all be arrested if there was any further interference in the Settlements process. We were advised that heavy documentation is associated with this statement.

• Criminal former President Bush 41 and his wife Barbara Pierce Bush (illegitimate daughter of the late British intelligence operative and Satanist, Aleister Crowley) were instructed by enforcement to ‘pack light’ (i.e. to place necessary clothes and toiletries only, in two small suitcases) so that they would be ready to be conveyed to jail at a moment’s notice. Recall from the preceding report that on 24th May 2009, Bush 41’s passport was taken away from him,

• Dr Henry Kissinger has been and is being accompanied at all times by two Interpol agents with instructions to arrest him immediately and take him into high security custody, in the event that he attempts to intervene in the Settlements process. These agents are not for Kissinger’s protection.

• President Obama, faced with the issuance of a Contempt of Court Writ by the World Court following a two-day extension granted on 1st June, which was the value date originally ‘agreed’, finally became ‘upset’ (the word used by our sources), and exerted himself against forces standing in the way of the Settlements process, given that the World Court proceedings could lead to the arrest of the President of the United States himself.

• An unknown number of senior US Army and Air Force personnel were arrested during the week ending Friday 5th June.

• The ‘Connecticut Trustee’ (group) obtained access to ‘their’ funds in the evening of Thursday 4th June 2009. However access was subsequently denied, the explanation given to us being that no parties may draw funds down until arrangements for subsequent recipients have been completed. [This information was ‘good’ up to 6th June but cannot be further elaborated upon given lack of updated information at the time this report was being prepared].

• With the same batch of information, the following assertion was included: ‘Next time people lie to [the Editor of this service], THEY will be liable to be arrested and jailed/indicted for disseminating false information’.

• We stress as follows:
ALL of the above intelligence has been RECONFIRMED TWICE by impeccable sources.

According to separate reports, a key Trustee failed to appear at a bank in Dallas in accordance with instructions at 1:00 pm Texas time on Thursday 4th June, in a move thought to have represented a delaying tactic. An earlier report to the same effect was also received.

The same Trustee was reported to us not to have had his paperwork ready on Monday 1st June, when he asked for more time. However on 6th the Trustee was duly escorted to the bank by US Marshals and was reported to be in the bank at 2:00pm Texas time on that date.

Finally, the criminal compartments, including we presume US Treasury operatives such as Timothy Geithner, the Bush and Clinton cadres, Leon Panetta and the ruthless fools inside the CIA and the rogue military elements, were, on 5th June, decisively rebuffed along the lines of (as it was put to us): ‘Who are you to destroy the American and world economies and to fling the American people into poverty?’. In other words, dare we say it, the message preached by this service and Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., has finally been accepted as realistic and sound – in the context of the ever more relentless thrashing that has been administered, and continues to be administered, to the criminal snakeheads who have tried to consolidate their hijacking of the whole of humanity in their lust to retain control of geomasonic Fraudulent Finance.

As late as Saturday 6th June, several operatives tried to block the progressing Settlements process, and were ‘dealt with’, according to reliable reports. There have also been unconfirmed reports of ‘horizontalisations’ and other drastic measures in the above overall context and within the timeframe referenced here.

EARLIER INTELLIGENCE RECEIVED [DIARY FORMAT]
Prior to receipt and confirmation of the foregoing data, the Editor obtained the following updates:

• The British head of State and Chinese Elders/authorities were reported to be working in ‘lock-step’ to insist upon the application of the Rule of Law inter alia through the World Court. We now believe that the primary momentum for resolution has been directed all along by Her Majesty The Queen and her special representatives.

It is likely that this momentum was greatly intensified following the stealing of The Queen’s gold on 29th-30th March 2007 which this service alone reported, and the subsequent scandal involving the misapplication of sovereign LOAN funds provided on 19th-20th June 2007 via the Bank of England to Bank of New York Mellon: [see reports: Archive], which had to be placed into ‘lockdown’ (10th-12th September 2008) inter alia after advice by the Editor of this service on 6th September 2008.

Prospective access to these LOAN funds was finally denied, again on our recommendation, on 29th January 2009, after the new Obama Administration had reneged on Barack Obama’s undertakings, signed during his earlier trip across Europe, to procure the Settlements without further ado and to allow the Refunding of the US Dollar System to proceed in a fully transparent taxable manner in the private sector with no US Government input and control. [Government creates debt only: it cannot generate taxable accruals. The private sector generates taxable income].

• On 27th May and again on 4th June 2009, the Editor received unsolicited voicemails from a party located geographically close to where Wanta resides, demanding cooperation in respect of matters with which the Editor has no interest or competence.

• On 27th May the Editor received an unsolicited voicemail from a man who said he was from China, with an Australian accent, and who said he was engaged in a prosecution through the UK Courts concerning certain assets, and wanted to meet the Editor as ‘we have certain information which you will find of interest and you may have information which we may find of interest’ (the usual, standard approach). On investigation it transpired that this person may be the son of Leo Wanta’s erstwhile Chinese ‘partner’, Howie Kwong Kok, who has Australian connections and is believed to have been brought up in Australia.

• 29th May: A significant number of associates of George Bush Sr. and of Dr Henry Kissinger were reported to have been arrested on Thursday and Friday 28th/29th May.

• 30th May: The Bushes and Clintons were all informed that if they dare to step in the way of resolution, they could all expect very severe retribution from which the specific prospect of ‘horizontalisation’ was reportedly not excluded.

• 30th May: A massive movement of funds between the Bank of America, Charlotte, and the Bank of America, Dallas, was reported to us to have occurred between noon on Saturday 30th May and noon on Sunday 31st May.

During this period, probably in order to distract the Editor and associates:

• The Editor’s main production computer suddenly became unstable, as had occurred once earlier during a period of extreme tension associated with this crisis. The Editor managed to save the files he was working on to four separate media, and closed down the computer. Next morning, at start-up, the hard disk was not recognised. A day was then wasted with IT assistants unable to ascertain the problem. A further day of the Editor’s time was wasted on Tuesday 2nd June; and after some consultants had been dismissed and replaced by another tech supplier, the problem was at once identified. The computer in question was finally restored in working order on Thursday 4th June. This would be of no outside interest were it not for the following facts which later came to light:

• One of the Editor’s special correspondents who has followed these issues very closely and has collaborated daily with us, experienced a complete primary computer failure which was reported to us during the same week.

• Another party, not in touch with the Editor but in touch with others of relevance in this context, experienced severe telecommunications disruptions during the same period.

• 1st June: Former President George W. Bush (43) was reported to be ‘on suicide watch’ which, being interpreted, was taken to mean ‘suicidED watch’.

• 1st June: George Bush Sr. was reported to be adamantly refusing, as usual, to cooperate: ‘You know who to talk to’, he was reported as shouting (presumably a reference to the Bush/Clinton stooge Leon Panetta, Director of Central Intelligence). In the face of this crude display of Bushite intransigence, enforcement personnel were reported to us to have shown Bush Sr. a number of statements from ‘his’ bank accounts. According to our sources, the amounts shown on these statements read: $0.00.

From subsidiary questioning, the Editor then established the likelihood that some of these bank statements would have been issued by one or more of the German banks acting as custodians of Bush Sr.’s funny money accounts, over which Chancellor Angela Merkel, bribed by Bush Sr. to guard ‘his’ financial interests within the German banking jurisdiction, was supposed to have exercised surveillance, as previously reported.

• 3rd June 2009: The World Court Contempt Writ first mentioned to us after the 1st June value date was ‘missed’, was confirmed to be issued on Thursday 4th June against President B. Obama in the obstruction of justice context previously explained by this service.

• 3rd June: Bush Sr. was reported to be engaged in hyperactive, vituperative behaviour in frantic moves to recoup the situation from his perspective, demanding that payments must be blocked, and telling anyone who would listen: ‘Can’t pay, won’t pay’.

• A key source told the Editor; ‘From what I hear, not a lot of people are listening’.

DISCONNECT AT THE U.S. TREASURY
The continued reprobate behaviour of the US Treasury is one of the darker mysteries that has not yet been fully explained, given that everything the Geithner Treasury is doing contravenes the principles of commonsense and sound finance.

Our key sources have confirmed that foreign governments have generally been stunned by, and unable to comprehend, the quite extraordinarily bovine behaviour of the Geithner-led delegation during their recent visit to Peking, which ended in Geithner’s humiliation (in a repetition of what happened to the equally unpopular Henry M. Paulson on several similar occasions).

Unbelievably, Geithner et al presented the Chinese with a proposal for a trading operation using $4.0 trillion – just as John Snow and Henry M. Paulson had done earlier. It will be recalled that the $4.5 trillion brought over in May 2006 from the People’s Bank of China following a visit to Peking by the criminal operative Dr Alan Greenspan and John Snow, the former US Treasury Secretary, was placed under contract (with the Chinese) in June 2006. These funds were then criminally replicated by the usual leveraging and hypothecation means, to yield multiple trillions.

Evidently the Geithner Treasury thought it could ‘pull’ the same trick with the Chinese in May/June 2009. However, with their fingers badly burned on multiple occasions by these duplicitous Jewish Americans, the Chinese turned the offer down and sent Geither packing with ‘a flea in his ear’ (or, as London East-enders would say ‘GBH of the ‘ear-’ole’ [Grievous Bodily Harm of the Ear-hole].

It appears that, following a leak, loose talk and sabotage attributed to a renegade British-based possible double agent, the US Treasury operatives thought they could pre-empt, replicate and displace, by means of a bilateral deal with the Chinese, the G-7-approved Refunding Programme (that is to be operated through London without US official input and control).

They reckoned without the central reality of the close collaboration and lock-step determination of the British Head of State and the relevant Chinese parties that there are to be no changes to the revised agreed arrangements.

The Chinese rejected the US Treasury’s proposed $4.0 trillion trading contract when (inevitably) they discovered that the funds were compromised; and Geithner was accordingly advised that it would be prudent for him and his delegation to leave the Chinese capital forthwith [see above].

The US Treasury is now engaged in TALF-4 – representing the FOURTH phase of its operation to try to regalvanise the moribund Fraudulent Finance sector, as lusted after by the recalcitrant Wall Street institutions, in defiance of logic but in response to the greed of certain banks (which might otherwise be surplus to the real economy’s requirements), and of US holders of high office.

The US Treasury is therefore persisting with its obtuse, perverse intent to revive the derivatives sector that collapsed as a direct consequence of the events of 10th-12th September 2008 (as a result of which the Editor received, on 18th September, the three-gunshot voicemail). It was no coincidence, either, that the most vitriolic attack on the Editor of this service perpetrated by one of the CIA-controlled disinformation and confusion-building websites occurred on 13th September.

[As previously reported here, data based on Bank for International Settlements’ (BIS) findings, published by the International Monetary Fund in April 2009, showed that the total notional market value of all derivatives contracts outstanding at the end of June 2008 (taking account of double-counting) stood at an estimated $683.7 trillion, leveraged from an actual gross market value of just $20.4 trillion. However given the ‘events of September 2008’, the derivatives sector was sharply reduced for the first time, to $592 trillion by the end of December 2008, according to a BIS report released on 18th May 2009. This first-ever decline brought the aggregate notional value of global derivatives contracts outstanding back close to the level of $595.3 trillion at end- December 2007].

‘MAINSTREAM’ NOW USING THE WORD ‘CRIMINAL’
That the US Treasury’s intellectual, moral and practical perversity in this crisis has now at long last been grasped at least by the New York media, was revealed in a Wall Street Journal article by Barry Grey dated 4th June, which contained inter alia the following observations:

‘Under the guise of enhanced regulation, the Obama Administration is working with major Wall Street banks to sanction a continuation of the speculative practices that precipitated the financial meltdown and the deepest economic slump since the Great Depression’.

This behaviour flies of course in the face of the specific proposals authored by Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., the US securities expert, in two presentations repeatedly published on this website and in our financial journal International Currency Review, in which we tore to shreds the Geithner and Paulson proposals.

However, in a petty gesture before leaving office, Henry M. Paulson saw to it that the subscription to International Currency Review held by the US Treasury since 1970, was cancelled – indicating that US Treasury officials do not wish the minds of their staff to be polluted by sound finance and common sense, given the disturbed nights that honest Treasury officials might be liable to suffer by comparing our sound financial proposals with their funny money ‘solutions’ that aren’t working.

The Wall Street Journal article dated 4th June continued:

‘Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has, according to a detailed exposé published May 1 by The New York Times, adopted a proposal drawn up by a group of Wall Street firms for new regulations on the lucrative trade in derivatives such as Credit Default Swaps. Geithner headed the New York Federal Reserve Bank and played a key rôle in the Bush II Administration’s bank bailout program before being named to his present post by Obama. His recently issued proposal on derivatives regulation, in opposition to measures backed by certain corporate interests, such as agribusiness firms and Congressmen who represent them, would exempt most trading in Credit Default Swaps from any serious public exposure or government regulation’.

‘Credit Default Swaps are contracts agreed to between corporations in which the seller insures the buyer against the default of specific corporate bonds or securities. The transactions are ‘over the counter’, i.e., arrived at privately without being listed on any public exchange. Since the passage of a law in 2000 supported and signed by then-President Clinton, they have been unregulated’.

This legislation triggered ‘an explosive growth of this form of financial gambling’.

Under the Geithner proposals, a ‘special dispensation’ is meant to apply to so-called ‘customized’ derivatives, a vague term that comprises most Credit Default Swaps, which would shield them from public scrutiny or government regulation’. This and other permissive ideas were incorporated into the current proposals for ‘increased’ oversight promoted by Geithner.

The article added that The New York Times had quoted Yra Harris, an independent commodities trader, as having summed up the situation as follows (this being of course entirely consistent with our own analysis):

‘The banks want to go back to business as usual – and then some. And they have a lot of audacity now that everyone has bailed them out. But we have to begin with the premise that Wall Street doesn’t want transparency because more transparency means less immediate profits’.

‘The instrument through which the banks are resuming at full throttle the criminal methods that have brought the US and world economy to its knees and inflicted growing social misery on the working class, is the Obama Administration’.

• Now, who would ever have imagined that there would come a time when the leading ‘mainstream’ newspapers in New York would at long last openly characterise the financial methods that are at the root of this crisis as CRIMINAL, as we have done these past three years?

• And who would ever have predicted that the leading New York ‘mainstream’ press would finally come to agree with us that the reason that sound finance is being rejected by the idiots in the driving seat is that practitioners of these CRIMINAL METHODS, abhor and fear TRANSPARENCY?

Which, of course, is precisely why the Group of Seven-Approved Refunding Programme, which is to be 100% TRANSPARENT, with the proceeds subject to taxation rather than being stashed untaxed in secret offshore bank accounts, is now to be operated wholly out of London, where the misguided Geithners, Paulsons, Bernankes and Dick Cheneys of this ‘Black’ world cannot interfere – and with Basel-II/Basel-III compliant UK and European banks exclusively, likely to be selected to participate in the programme because the big American banks have so consistently demonstrated throughout this crisis that, like the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve, they cannot be trusted.

PERVERSE INTENT TO REVIVE AND CONTINUE THE FRAUDULENT FINANCE CAROUSEL
So it is now glaringly obvious from all key quarters on both sides of the Atlantic that, following the obtuse lead of the wrong-headed US Treasury, the international financial community is dead-set on seeking the revival of the corrupt derivatives sector and the Fraudulent Finance trade operations underpinning it, without regard for the extreme dangers that will arise from the continuation of this criminal and speculative off-balance sheet trading.

Notwithstanding the power of this website, and the publicity we have given to the sound proposals developed by the US securities expert Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. – the most qualified technician in this specialist area who has not been compromised (and who would be a trillionaire by now had he succumbed on many occasions earlier) – the reprobate intention of the Wall Street institutions and the likes of Barclays Bank, Deutsche Bank, Paribas and the multiple other corrupted financial institutions including the Israeli banks which have brought the world to the brink of financial and economic disaster in their relentless pursuit of fiat profit, is to revert, as The Wall Street Journal has at last understood, to CRIMINAL ‘business as usual’.

For this reason, there is extreme concern in the relevant circles at the fact that the Refunding Programme, which was to have been run out of the United States, has been switched to London, where it will be operated exclusively in the private sector and in a 100% transparent manner, with all accruals subject to tax in the United Kingdom – as well as in the United States (via the profits earned on the intended trades by Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.).

Since the operation will be entirely transparent, and the resulting taxable banked deposits will be placed ONTO the recipient banks’ books rather than stashed offshore in secret bank accounts to evade tax, as has been the norm, the resulting accruals will represent GOOD MONEY in the proper sense of the term – which will, by definition, assume ‘seniority’ over speculative trading accruals transacted illegally in accordance with the criminal ‘business as usual’ routine.

• FACT: The momentum for Settlement has been driven by jealousy and anger at the intended London-based Refunding Programme which will have no US Government input, so that it will proceed outside the intermeddling control of the US authorities. Recall that the motivation behind the scenes all along has been to RETAIN CONTROL OF TRADING.

The Geithner Treasury is pursuing the WRONG POLICIES for the primary and overriding reason that it seeks to retain control and cannot tolerate the prospect of losing it.

• FACT: As repeatedly stated here, Government, by definition, cannot generate taxable income. It can of itself only create DEBT. Taxable income can ONLY be generated by the private sector. The Government cannot tax itself (other than via the remuneration of its employees).

Therefore, the US Treasury’s policy of inventing convoluted mechanisms which have the objective of enabling it to retain control of trading, is perverse and represents a gross fraud perpetrated on the American taxpayer – since a corresponding mountain of new debt appears on the other side of the Treasury’s balance sheet.

This behaviour is correctly describable as FINANCIAL TERRORISM and we hereby again denounce it as such. The British Treasury have adopted a similar derivatives-centric stance.

Indeed, the point we made recently about the UK Treasury paying huge sums of money for advice from tainted City-based institutions, to guide the Treasury’s response to the mayhem caused by those same criminalist institutions, has now been confirmed by Lord Oakshott of Seagrove Bay, the Liberal Democrats’ Treasury spokesman, who is cited in The Times of 8th June 2009, in a Business Section article by correspondent Suzy Jagger entitled ‘City Banks send the Treasury a £9m bill for advice on solving the financial crisis’, as saying:

‘Taxpayers are paying through the nose for Treasury officials’ ignorance of how the City [of London] works. From my experience of dealing with them in connection with the nationalisation of Northern Rock, it is matched only by the arrogance’.

‘Because the Treasury has no core expertise, it has been running in desperation to the City which is not able to give proper independent advice. Many of these investment banks were on the one hand creating the toxic investments which made the crisis much worse, and on the other hand taking fees to get us out of it’.

• PRECISELY.

MACROFINANCIAL ASSESSMENT AND PROSPECTS
Asia-based analysts are pointing out that the size of the ‘hidden’ US financial bubble that has burst is so colossal that actual losses cannot be quantified, given the lack of transparency.

For several decades, the US banks, operating within the context that the Federal Reserve has one asset alone – the power to print money without limit – ‘went global’, issuing debt instruments to foreigners for proprietary ‘over-the-counter’ (private, unrecorded) speculative trading operations and investment – over-leveraging their base capital by several dozen times.

This ‘easy money’ policy, associated with the low interest rate policy pursued during the loose Greenspan era, created a bubble economy without historical precedent – against the background that the untaxed, off-balance sheet trading operations were ballooning the overall (unquantified) dollar money supply, with ongoing inflationary consequences.

Since Nixon and Bush Sr. implemented the long-range German strategy of de-industrialising ‘the Main Enemy’, starting in the early 1970s, the United States and Britain have both foolishly walked away from manufacturing, shifting the ‘productive’ economic focus towards consumption and the parasitical financial services feeding on the underlying inflationary environment – backed by the United States’ temporary privilege of being able to issue currency that foreigners were prepared to accumulate and hold. The US dollar was floated worldwide, functioning as the de facto medium of international transactions at virtually zero cost to the United States. Against this background, US consumers went on a consumption binge, enhancing their already high standard of living.

When the Editor first became ‘hands-on’ engaged in aspects of this crisis, he warned several parties (whose eyes duly glazed over) that this process could not continue for ever as there is no free lunch: and that when it ran into a brick wall, the shock would be devastating, with the real prospect that US living standards could collapse by 50% within a matter of months – as foreigners refused to accumulate more dollars and dollar-denominated assets, sought to dump those they already held, and the dollar then collapsed, driving foreign currencies sharply upwards so that Americans would be unable to afford many imports.

• When that happened, the only remaining ‘remedy’ for the Federal Reserve would be to print money, leading to the inevitable hyperinflation.

Dr Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, has told Congress recently that the Fed is confident that this outcome can be avoided, without providing any back-up for this statement.

The mechanism whereby we wind up with a hyperinflation is slightly different to that envisaged when we first warned of such an outcome in our report dated 2nd September 2006 – due to the irresponsible behaviour of the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve in adopting the chronically unsound policies that will generate huge mountains of background debt that will burden many generations of Americans to come – in the absence of a hyperinflation, that is.

The dollar paper issued to foreign creditor institutions, funds and sovereign governments around the world, is becoming a vast liability. Global economic imbalances, associated with the mentioned US overconsumption, and with overproduction in key emerging market economies and Japan, are experiencing a sharp correction. The Americans over-consumed by issuing fiat debt to finance consumption, while foreign countries channelled reserves back to the United States, so that US consumers would continue to buy their cheap goods.

But since exports to the United States have collapsed, foreign creditors are wary of subscribing to new US debt, especially given their shrewd understanding that US official debt-issuance is out of control due to the fact that the US Treasury has chosen to follow the wrong course – having the US Government (and its cronies, and the Intelligence Power) involved in a resumption of the familiar criminal ‘business as usual’, against the background of technical arrangements which generate massive unnecessary Treasury ‘background debt’.

And foreign creditors understand perfectly well that this wrong-headed course is being pursued because the US Treasury and the Government’s cronies plus the CIA want to retain control of speculative trading, as though there was never any discontinuity last September.

FOREIGN CREDITORS ARE CUTTING THEIR LOSSES
Not surprisingly, foreign creditors are cutting their losses and are seeking to diversify out of US dollar-denominated holdings. As the permissive US official debt issuance proceeds, the alarm bells that have been ringing in foreign capitals will wax much louder.

It is a fact that without the contrived on-balance sheet liquidity-raising operations spawned by the Treasury and the Federal Reserve, certain banks would have collapsed – which is why well-known names are refusing depositors’ requests for large withdrawals: indeed we have heard that at least one US institution has, in recent months, required its customers to give notice when they intend to withdraw more than $10,000. All of which implies that a run on the largest banks has only narrowly been avoided. Citibank of course, like General Motors, is no longer a stock exchange name.

Participating banks were issuing fraudulent ‘bundled’ mortgage-backed securities (itself a wholly fraudulent description) and other derivative financial ‘products’ in the same way that the Federal Reserve issues currency – backed by nothing at all, and ‘supported exclusively’ by the bank’s brand name. Despite the hyped ‘recovery’ rhetoric and a probably temporary illusion of renewed prosperity fuelled by the vast issuance of liquidity to stave off collapse, the banks that have issued these dubious (fraudulent) instruments are now having to take them back: and since they lack the necessary liquidity to finance such buy-backs as the credit market has long since stalled, the US banks are having to rely on the Federal Reserve for ‘cash’.

Partly as a consequence, US Treasury instruments, previously considered risk-free (backed by the ‘Full Faith and Credit of the United States’) are now under pressure.

Several key emerging countries, including Brazil, India, Russia, China and Iran, are discussing the possibility of abandoning the US dollar as a reserve currency (a prospect fraught with practical problems: but the point is that this is being discussed).

Due to our take-down of the idea during the Spring Meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, the proposal to expand the use of the Fund’s Special Drawing Rights for this purpose flopped immediately: but the point, again, is that this development reflected international nervousness about the US dollar as the reserve currency.

The huge deficits that the Obama Administration seeks to finance cannot be funded of course by the US Treasury itself, let alone by Americans whose savings and investments lost 50% of their value over one year prior to the recent stock market recovery fuelled by the Fed’s ‘quantitative easing’ policy. There are therefore only two obvious options, as US policymakers have rejected the private sector Refunding Programme option, which would solve the entire problem once and for all: selling ever more debt to reluctant foreigners, or the domestic printing press.

The above-board Refunding Programme to be operated from London will resolve all issues, even though we know for a fact that US authorities have tried, unsuccessfully, to sabotage it. Incredible as it may appear, the US Treasury, the recalcitrant Intelligence Power and the US ‘crony community’ would prefer to destroy the US financial and real economies, and to create conditions for a 50% collapse in American living standards, rather than to yield to the impeccable logic of the private sector Refunding Programme. This is clear from the unsuccessful steps they have taken to try to redirect, amend and hijack it in recent weeks.

One of these steps involved a UK-based intermediary, working indirectly for Cheney, failing to deliver papers to the highest level in the United Kingdom, and yet representing that he did so.

Since the Treasury will not back off from the misguided course it is pursuing, under Geithner as under his criminalist predecessor, Paulson, the United States will career towards the inevitable hyperinflation – with the GOOD MONEY generated by the private sector London operation quickly gaining the upper hand so that the US Treasury will no longer need to issue debt on the open-ended basis currently planned. This is because the Treasury will, ‘whether it likes it or not’, find itself at the receiving end of the windfall dollar tax receipts that it has refused to countenance.

It seems that nothing can be done to get the US authorities to see sense, beyond the fact that the Settlements process has been driven, of late, by the real prospect of the London-based Refunding Programme. Unfortunately, given the reckless intransigence, not to mention the criminal terrorist financing tendencies, of the US Treasury, the rapid US inflation that is now anticipated by the Bank of England, the Swiss National Bank and the Bank of Japan, will wind up chasing American goods domestically, because foreign goods (including crucial ‘just-in-time’ supplies) will be uncompetitive due to the appreciation of foreign currencies against the collapsing dollar.

• So to assume that the real crisis has even started, is naïve in the extreme.

POLICY DECISIONS WITHOUT THE MISSING INPUT
Moreover it appears that policymakers have acted on the assumption that the Settlements process will never be completed (as intended by the Bush-Greenspan ‘never-pay’ model).

That the controlled media have ignored this dimension of the crisis, and our own reports as well as those published in International Currency Review, is one thing (with which we are all familiar).

But for policymakers, who know all about this central dimension of the crisis, to take decisions that appear wholly to ignore the completion of the Settlements process, is extraordinary – implying that the US Treasury’s notorious myopia, untrustworthiness and moral perversity are replicated in other financial capitals as well.

It will therefore be ‘interesting’ to see how policymakers react to the completion of the Settlements process. Frankly, all decisions taken since the crisis erupted, due to the wrong decisions adopted by the Paulson and Geithner Treasury, will have to be reviewed in the light of this ‘unexpected circumstance’ (which was ‘never supposed to happen, you understand’).

As usual, there will be an overlap while the new environment takes hold – and even as national policymakers continue to take comfort from the erroneous assumption that deflationary data is inconsistent with a hyperinflation later.

INDICATORS OF GLOBAL DEFLATION
The World Bank’s Chief economist, Justin Yifu Lin, has reported that global capacity utilisation is running at the historically low level of between 50% and 60%, implying that firms will have to keep dismissing employees, which will depress domestic consumption further. Asian trade data look awful, too: the latest monthly export figures for Malaysia, South Korea and India show year-on-year contractions of 26%, 33% and 28.3% respectively; and the share of exports in Asian Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has risen from 36% to 47% over the past decade, thereby exacerbating Asia’s fatal dependence on exports to the West.

Year-on-year deflation rates for selected countries look worse by the month:
China: – 1.5%; United States: – 0.7%; Singapore: – 0.7%; Ireland: – 3.5%; Japan: – 0.1%;
Thailand: – 3.3%; Switzerland: – 1.0%; Spain: – 0.8%; Taiwan: – 0.5%; Belgium: – 0.4%;
Sweden: – 0.1%; Germany: 0%.

According to the Association of American Railroads, traffic was 22% down in the third week of May 2009 compared with a year earlier, while Canadian rail freight was down year-on-year by 34%. The Chief Economist of the American Trucking Association has said that tonnage is down by 13% over 12 months, with monthly declines of 4.5% in March and a further 2.2% in April.

In Britain, where analysts rely inordinately on a recovery of housing prices, mortgage approvals rose for the third month running in April, to 43,000 – whereas the total volume of monthly approvals needed for UK house prices to stop declining is 80,000.

Overall, the loose talk of ‘green shoots’ is nothing more than propaganda fuelled by a slight ‘feel-better’ factor arising from the historically unprecedented orgy of ‘quantitative easing’ undertaken by central banks which were themselves heavily involved, along with huge institutions they were supposed to be supervising, in the criminal Fraudulent Finance that has been exposed. And the US Treasury wants to revert to that discredited model!

CHENEY’S NEWSMAX OPERATION CLOSED DOWN?
In the preceding report [26th May 2009] we exposed an elaborate scheme [‘the new Cheney-linked dollar-collection scheme’] to mobilise smaller US investors’ dollars via the Newsmax service which, when analysed, boiled down to the provision of two-month interest-free loans via the purchase of refundable multiple subscriptions, by gullible participants who may well have learned nothing from recent events – ‘permitting’ the investors to ‘follow’ the investment trades to be undertaken by or for the Newsmax proprietor, Christopher Ruddy, on the advice of the CIA financial operative David Frazier. We revealed that this operative works for Cheney, and that his task in the operation was to ‘free up’ ‘small money’ dollars in order to generate a pool of US dollars for exchange through the collaborating London-based US agent Dr Cynthia Dremel for the Euros stashed illegally by Cheney abroad while he was in office.

We pointed out inter alia that because this operation involved discounting the US dollar, it was de facto a fraud against the United States. It was also exposed as a form of Ponzi operation, given the incorporation of the 60-day 100% refund ‘guarantee’ which meant that if the subscriber wished, he or she could demand their money back within the 60-day period, during which time the promoters will have had the use of the subscriber’s funds interest-free, and will have been able to trade those funds for their own purposes.

• FACT: Following our exposure, nothing more has been heard of this operation.

Instead, on 6th June, Ruddy started promoting his own appearance at ‘FreedomFest’, scheduled for 9th-11th July 2009, at Bally’s in Las Vegas, to be attended by Steve Forbes and ‘my friend, Mark Skousen’. The Editor recalls that the first commentator to mention the Editor’s investigation into Fraudulent Finance (in 2003) was Mark Skousen, who pooh-poohed what we were doing, adding that ‘Christopher Story would be liable loose all his subscribers’, as a result of this investigation.

Anyway, the hassle-hassle Newsmax sales spiel promoting ‘Your Million Dollar Secret Code’ was suddenly switched from the Ponzi scheme to the urgency of needing to register at Bally’s: ‘You can book your deluxe accommodation for just $74 per night! Rooms are going fast, so register today for Newsmax’s special schedule at FreedomFest – and book your room today’.

• And for goodness sake, don’t ever mention ‘Your Million Dollar Secret Code’, please. Nope: a thick veil has been drawn over that one. Other careless CIA promoters of Ponzi schemes: please note: you may be exposed before you can even get started.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. Some versions have a ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

RELEASES OCCURRED ON 1ST MAY AS DEMANDED BY WRIT

BUT THE CUSTODIAN BANKS ARE ILLEGALLY BLOCKING TRUSTEES’ ACCESS

Thursday 7 May 2009 08:00

THE BANKS ARE OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, ARE ACTING ILLEGALLY, AND ARE IN GROSS AND BLATANT BREACH OF THEIR BASIC FIDUCIARY DUTIES AS CUSTODIANS OF THEIR CLIENT TRUSTEES’ PAID-IN FUNDS. THESE BANKS ARE PERPETRATING FINANCIAL TERRORISM:

• FUNDS WERE PLACED IN THE TRUSTEES’ ACCOUNTS ON 1ST MAY

• BUT THE CUSTODIAN BANKS HAVE SO FAR ILLEGALLY BLOCKED ACCESS TO THE FUNDS

• THE WRIT HAS THEREFORE NOT BEEN FULLY EXECUTED

• WERE THE BANKS GIVEN PERMISSION TO ACT ILLEGALLY?

• WARNING TO GEITHNER IN THE LIGHT OF THE ABOVE

• OBAMA AND GEITHNER OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE AND PERPETRATING TERRORISM

• CRIMINAL FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES AND THEIR DIRECTORS

• ENFORCEMENT TEAM CONTINUING ITS NECESSARY WORK

• THE CRIMINAL BANKS HAVE NO EXCUSE THIS TIME

• NOW WE KNOW WHY THE TRUSTEES WERE ABUSED ALL WEEKEND

• THE AIR FORCE ONE EPISODE OVER MANHATTAN

• THE CURIOUS MATTER OF THE BRIEFCASE UNDER THE TABLE

• ‘WEAPONISED PNEUMONIC OR BUBONIC PLAGUE’

• FORMER U.S. HIGH OFFICIALS CONTINUE RUNNING ‘BLACK OPS’

• WILD REPORTS BY ANONYMOUS UNPROVENANCED SOURCES

• OUTGOING BRITISH M.E.P. BLASTS THE SHAM EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

THE SOLUTION TO THE CRISIS THAT HAS BEEN AVAILABLE ALL ALONG:
Operating the $ Refunding from London without US Government participation delivers:

(1) Massive ongoing windfall tax accruals to the BRITISH Treasury given that all funds resident in the United Kingdom jurisdiction for 24 hours are taxable by the Inland Revenue. This makes the UK Refunding proposal of extreme interest to Her Majesty’s Government and the UK Treasury.

((2) Massive ongoing windfall benefits to the UNITED STATES Treasury given that it will also receive a cascade of tax accruals from this independent private sector Refunding Program.

(3) The necessary refinancing of the UK and US banking systems ON THE BOOKS with no input from either Government and NO CORRESPONDING DEBT CREATED IN THE BACKGROUND.

(4) GOOD (i.e., on-balance sheet, taxed) money which will CHASE OUT THE BAD MONEY that the crass US Fraudulent Finance concoction will generate.

• In mid-March we published: International Currency Review Volume 34, #2 on Systemic Fraudulent Finance and The Legalisation of Financial Corruption. Also published recently are issues of our titles The Latin American Times, Economic Intelligence Review, London Currency Report, Interest Rate Service and Arab-Asian Affairs. Issues of Soviet Analyst and Global Analyst are imminent.

• For details, see the second white panel on the Home Page.

• To subscribe to our intelligence services, see the catalogue under World Reports Limited.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice is comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor’s study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the Internet Security Solution software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

• DONATIONS: You can help finance these exposures (which the Editor has to prepare on top of his normal publishing responsibilities) by sending us a donation. Press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

• LEO WANTA: As you may recall, the Editor lent this operative $35,000 to extract him from what we diagnosed as fraudulent probation, due to expire on 28th November 2010. This action triggered the entire sequence of unravelling events that has followed. As a consequence, Wanta’s probation was duly shortened by five years, to expire on 14th November 2005. The private funds, which the Editor filched from the proceeds of the sale of our London house, should have been repaid on 11th June 2007 with interest, having been made available for a two-year term. The Editor has not been repaid, Mr Wanta has taken no steps to indicate to the Editor why this is the case, and has not written to explain the situation: so that, as a consequence, these funds are considered to have been stolen.

Furthermore, after the Editor made this platform available to assist Mr Wanta with his problems, he double-crossed us as revealed in our reports dated 3rd and 18th March 2008. Since then, we have had nothing whatsoever to do with this US operative. However on 6th May 2009, he took it into his head to circulate, without our permission, a copyrighted report that we published on the 18th April 2006. The Editor would like it to be known that we did not authorise the redistribution of this article and that Wanta is not permitted to steal our copyrighted works without prior permission. Should any further such breaches occur, we will reserve the right to add this further impertinence to the list of follies that this operative has committed against us, and will take measures to protect our rights.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

RELEASES TOOK PLACE ON 1ST MAY AS REQUIRED BY THE WRIT
On 1st May 2009, the necessary releases, delayed since time immemorial by the corruption of the highest US office-holders, intelligence cadres, banks and their foreign co-conspirators to defraud the rightful recipients, were paid into the Trustee accounts at the relevant US money center banks.

BUT THE CUSTODIAN BANKS HAVE SO FAR ILLEGALLY BLOCKED ACCESS TO THE FUNDS
It is now SIX days later, and the banks acting as custodians of the funds have failed to allow the Trustees into whose accounts the funds were paid, to access them – in gross, criminal breach of their fiduciary duty to enable the Trustees to take economic receipt of the funds for which they are responsible. The banks are therefore engaged in criminal obstruction of justice and terrorism.

FUNDS WERE PLACED IN THE TRUSTEES’ ACCOUNTS ON 1ST MAY
The released funds are ON THE BANKS’ BOOKS, which is the central point to bear in mind when assessing what follows. Instead of allowing the Trustees to handle their funds in accordance with instructions, the criminal enterprise banks are exploiting the existence of these funds that are now ON their books to generate new liquidity, on the working assumption that (a) they will not be held to account and (b) that the President of the United States and the Treasury Secretary will not enforce the law to bring an end to this criminal abuse and obstruction of justice.

THE WRIT HAS THEREFORE NOT BEEN FULLY EXECUTED
The World Court Writ of Execution raised by the Chinese parties and representatives of The Queen reportedly on behalf of the international community to bring an end to this American (and German) financial criminality has therefore not yet been fully enforced. The first stage – release of the funds into the Trustees’ accounts – took place as noted on 1st May 2009, thereby ‘compromising’ the war threat by the international community.

But the second stage, permitting use of the funds by the Trustees, had yet, as of this filing, to be implemented. The banks in question are custodians with fiduciary responsibility to the Trustees, and are required forthwith to place the funds live on their clients’ accounts. They have no latitude whatsoever to prevent their clients from using their funds as they see fit.

But that is not happening. Furthermore, this has been going on for the past six days.

WERE THE BANKS GIVEN PERMISSION TO ACT ILLEGALLY?
Because what they are all doing is ILLEGAL, it appears that the institutions may have been GIVEN PERMISSION TO ACT ILLEGALLY, which may implicate the US Treasury Secretary, Mr Timothy Geithner, and the President of the United States, Mr Barack Obama.

Mr Geithner can ORDER the banks to release the funds to the Trustees but, as of this posting, HE HAD NOT YET DONE SO. That means he is a co-conspirator in this OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

Why is this? Could he have been coerced? Could he have been bought off? The second possibility seems more likely, in view of the sudden appearance – out of context – of the following text at the foot of a report published by the operative Wayne Madsen on 5th May, which also mentioned the London ‘Safety Lock Box’ raids that took place on 2nd June 2008 that we have often referred to in these reports, since they ‘blew’ the geo-corruption linkages sky-high, and have triggered multiple dimensions of the unraveling process, as predicted:

‘Informed sources have told WMR (Wayne Madsen Report) that high-level rumors of a sex scandal involving the Treasury Secretary (Timothy Geithner) are swirling around both the Treasury and the Inter-American Development Bank, headquartered in Washington, DC’.

WARNING TO GEITHNER IN THE LIGHT OF THE ABOVE
Since Madsen is known to be an operative, we take this as a warning to Geithner that he is to be or is being blackmailed; and the reason for the appearance of this text out of context from the rest of the Madsen report dated 5th-6th May is that Geithner is allowing the banks to break the law and is obstructing justice – a not-so-subtle way of drawing to his attention the need for the US Treasury Secretary to reverse himself IMMEDIATELY and to order the banks to cease and desist from their illegal operations, obstruction of justice and abuse of their fiduciary duties.

OBAMA AND GEITHNER OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE AND PERPETRATING TERRORISM
More generally, since Geithner and relevant highest-level officials with the power to do so have NOT PREVENTED THE BANKS FROM ACTING ILLEGALLY, they are ALL OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE and are de facto co-conspirators in this FRAUD and breach of the Rule of Law. Therefore, they can be designated, like the criminal enterprise institutions concerned, as being themselves engaged in perpetrating financial and economic terrorism against the United States, the people of the United States and the Rest of the World, for which only the most severe measures are applicable.

Also obstructing justice and engaging in economic and financial terrorism, given their involvement in these matters, are Mrs Barbara Bush – who is stated by multiple sources to be handling Mr Bush Sr.’s affairs and interacting with the Pierce family given that Bush Sr.’s dementia is progressing fast (it is further advanced than is reported) and he has difficulty recognising his sources by name or face – Vice President Joseph Biden, William Jefferson Clinton and Mrs Hillary Rodomski Clinton.

(Having put his foot in it by stating that, given the ‘flu scare, he would not advise his family to travel on public transport, Biden made sure that cameras were on hand when he publicly appeared on 4th April at the Wilmington, Delaware, train station after riding Amtrak from Washington).

CRIMINAL FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES AND THEIR DIRECTORS
The criminal enterprise institutions that are acting illegally in breach of their fiduciary duties and obstructing justice in this respect are reported to us to include the following:

JPMorganChase, Deutsche Bank acting as clearing house for JPMorganChase, Citibank, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo.

The Directors of these institutions, being responsible to their Boards, are PERSONALLY liable along with their criminal enterprise firms, for the consequences of the crimes being committed, whether authorised by higher authority of not. That includes OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

Higher authority cannot ever authorise illegal activity – the overturning of the Rule of Law – with impunity. It may THINK it can, and the banks that are exploiting the fact that huge sums were placed ONTO THEIR BOOKS on 1st May 2009, may ASSUME that they are authorised to operate illegally, with impunity: but the price to be paid for this grotesque breach of their basic fiduciary duty and the parallel obstruction of justice will almost certainly turn out to be extremely high.

The Directors of these entities (1) are as follows:

Akamoto, Ross, Deutsche Bank AG
Al Thani, Nawaf, Deutsche Bank AG
Armstrong, C. Michael, Citigroup/Citibank
Asmarger, Regis, Deutsche Bank AG
Arzber, Thomas, Deutsche Bank AG
Augustine, Norman, Deutsche Bank AG
Baker II, John D., Wells Fargo
Barnet III, William, Bank of America
Belda, Alain J.P., Citigroup/Citibank
Binh, Pham, Deutsche Bank AG
Bock, Kurt, Deutsche Bank AG
Böhr, Wolfgang, Deutsche Bank AG
Borda, Kenneth, Deutsche Bank AG
Börsig, Clements, Deutsche Bank AG
Botelho, Mauricio, Deutsche Bank AG
Bowles, Crandall C., JPMorganChase
Bramble, Sr., Frank P., Bank of America
Braunstein, Jason, Deutsche Bank AG
Bryant, Charles, Deutsche Bank AG
Bryson, John, Deutsche Bank AG
Budzvna, John, Deutsche Bank AG
Burke, Stephen B., JPMorganChase
Capellas, Michael, Deutsche Bank AG
Cardoso, Fernando, Deutsche Bank AG
Cash Jr., James, Deutsche Bank AG
Casjens, Günther, Deutsche Bank AG
Chandler, Edward, Deutsche Bank AG
Chen, John S., Wells Fargo
Colbert, Virgis W., Bank of America
Collins, John T., Bank of America
Conroy, Kathryn, Deutsche Bank AG
Cote, David M. JPMorganChase
Countryman, Gary L., Bank of America
Crown, James S., JPMorganChase
Cunningham Keith, Deutsche Bank AG
Dean, Lloyd H., Wells Fargo
Deering, Anthony, Deutsche Bank AG
Deutch, John M., Citigroup/Citibank
Dimon, James, JPMorganChase
Dunham, Archie, Deutsche Bank AG
Eick, Karl-Erhard, Deutsche Bank AG
Fallon, Robert, Deutsche Bank AG
Förster, Heldrum, Deutsche Bank AG
Fortabat, Maria de, Deutsche Bank AG
Franks, Tommy R., Bank of America
Futter, Ellen V., JPMorganChase
Gifford, Charles K., Bank of America
Gray, III, William H., JPMorganChase
Griswold IV, Benjamin, Deutsche Bank AG
Grundhofer, Jerry A., Citigroup/Citibank
Guzman, Nicolas, Deutsche Bank AG
Hashimoto, Toru, Deutsche Bank AG
Herling, Alfred, Deutsche Bank AG
Hernandez, Jr., Enrique, Wells Fargo
Herzberg, Gerd, Deutsche Bank AG
Howell, William, Deutsche Bank AG
Idei, Nobuyuki, Deutsche Bank AG
Iglesias, Enrique, Deutsche Bank AG
Jackson, Jr., Laban P., JPMorganChase
James, Donald M., Wells Fargo
Jeffe, Robert, Deutsche Bank AG
Job, KBE, Peter, Deutsche Bank AG
Johnson, Robert, Deutsche Bank AG
Joss, Robert L., Wells Fargo
Kaden, Lewis B. Citigroup/Citibank
Kagermann, Henning, Deutsche Bank AG
Kangas, Edward, Deutsche Bank AG
Kappes, Hans-Peter, Deutsche Bank AG
Khan, Rafi, Deutsche Bank AG
Klee, Martina, Deutsche Bank AG
Kley, Karl-Ludwig, Deutsche Bank AG
Kovacevich, Richard M., Wells Fargo
Kuczynski, Pedro-Pablo, Deutsche Bank AG
Labarge, Suzanne, Deutsche Bank AG
Lee, Gang-Yon, Deutsche Bank AG
Lévy, Maurice, Deutsche Bank AG
Lewis, Kenneth D., Bank of America
Li, David, Deutsche Bank AG
Liveris, Andrew N., Citigroup/Citibank
Lozano, Monica C., Bank of America
Luengas, François, Deutsche Bank AG
Mark, Henriette, Deutsche Bank AG
Marram, Ellen, Deutsche Bank AG
Martin, Lynn, Deutsche Bank AG
Massey, Walter E., Bank of America
May, Robert, Deutsche Bank AG
May, Thomas J., Bank of America
McCormick, Richard D., Wells Fargo
McDonald, Mackey J., Wells Fargo
Mer, Francis, Deutsche Bank AG
Milligan, Cynthia H., Wells Fargo
Mitchell, Georgina, Deutsche Bank AG
Mitchell, Patricia E., Bank of America
Montova, Miguel, Deutsche Bank AG
Moore, Nicholas G., Wells Fargo
Mordashov, Aleksey, Deutsche Bank AG
Moriarty, Rich, Deutsche Bank AG
Mulcahy, Anne, Citigroup/Citibank
Neubart, Garrett, Deutsche Bank AG
Nocvak, David C., JPMorganChase
Oetker, August, Deutsche Bank AG
O’Neill, Michael E., Citigroup/Citibank
Pagani, Luis, Deutsche Bank AG
Pandit, Vikram, Citigroup/Citibank
Parsons, Richard D., Citigroup/Citibank
Pfeiffer, Eckhard, Deutsche Bank AG
Phelps, Michael, Deutsche Bank AG
Pina, Antonio, Deutsche Bank AG
Pischetsrieder, Bernd, Deutsche Bank AG
Platscher, Gabriele, Deutsche Bank AG
Prueher, Joseph W., Bank of America
Qingyuan, Li, Deutsche Bank AG
Quigley, Philip J., Wells Fargo
Ramadorai, S., Deutsche Bank AG
Raymond, Lee R., JPMorganChase
Rhodes, Bill, Citigroup/Citibank
Ricciardi, Lawrence R., Citigroup/Citibank
Rice, Donald B., Wells Fargo
Rodin, Judith, Citigroup/Citibank
Rogowski, Michael, Deutsche Bank AG
Rossotti, Charles O., Bank of America
Ruck, Karin, Deutsche Bank AG
Runstad, Judith M., Wells Fargo
Ryan, Charles, Deutsche Bank AG
Ryan, Robert L., Citigroup/Citibank
Ryan, Thomas M., Bank of America
Sada, Armando, Deutsche Bank AG
Samuelsson, Hakan, Deutsche Bank AG
Sanger. Stephen W., Wells Fargo
Santomero, Anthony M., Citigroup/Citibank
Schaeffer, Maria-Elisabeth, Deutsche Bank AG
Siegert, Theo, Deutsche Bank AG
Sloan Jr, O. Temple, Bank of America
Snow, John, Deutsche Bank AG
Steel, Robert K., Wells Fargo
Stumpf, John G., Wells Fargo
Svenson, Susan G., Wells Fargo
Tan, Keng Yamc, Deutsche Bank AG
Teyssen, Johannes, Deutsche Bank AG
Thieme, Marlehn, Deutsche Bank AG
Thompson, Jr., William S., Citigroup/Citibank
Thumann, Jürgen, Deutsche Bank AG
Tillman, Robert L., Bank of America
Todenhöfer, Tilman, Deutsche Bank AG
Toth, Devin, Deutsche Bank AG
Unuvar, Ahmet, Deutsche Bank AG
Urrutia, Miguel, Deutsche Bank AG
Volk, Stephen, Citigroup/Citibank
Wanandi, Sofjan, Deutsche Bank AG
Ward, Jackie M., Bank of America
Weatherill, Lucas, Deutsche Bank AG
Weldon, William C., JPMorganChase
Wenning, Werner, Deutsche Bank AG
Wolfe, Louis, Deutsche Bank AG
Wunderlich, Leo, Deutsche Bank AG
Yunling, Zhang, Deutsche Bank AG
Zetsche, Dieter, Deutsche Bank AG
Zhang, Lee, Deutsche Bank AG

ENFORCEMENT TEAM CONTINUING ITS NECESSARY WORK
The enforcement team headed by Swiss personnel cooperating with foreign government cadres to enforce execution of the World Court’s Writ of Execution continues, we understand, to deploy all means available to procure compliance with the Writ of Execution. Arrests and ‘neutralisations’ have continued unabated for the past several weeks.

Since the enforcement team is NOT free to leave the job half done – as discussed in the preceding report, failure to execute the Writ of Execution is not an option for the team’s members: otherwise they themselves will become co-conspirators in the obstruction of justice – this heightened crisis environment will continue until resolution.

Logic would therefore suggest that ALL Directors of the criminal enterprise institutions engaged in this fraudulent tapping of the paid-in funds, breach of fiduciary duty and obstruction of justice are vulnerable to whatever measures the enforcement team unilaterally decides to take in order to fulfil its instructions and to procure completion of its allotted task – which means compelling these very arrogant and recalcitrant institutions and their Directors, to meet their fiduciary obligations.

THE CRIMINAL BANKS HAVE NO EXCUSE THIS TIME
In the past, criminalist officials and bankers have enjoyed playing the disinformation game of ‘it’s not my fault’: but this option is precluded now because the institutions concerned are all overtly engaged in maximising the accruals to be leveraged off the funds that are sitting on their books in the Trustees’ accounts, which is illegal. The big US banks are in gross breach of standard banking conduct, which means that, as we have often argued in the past, they cannot be trusted to carry out instructions – which further means that anyone dealing with the identified giga-institutions may be risking the loss of control over any funds they handle.

Moreover by depriving the countries and Trustees of their rightful funds while these banks pursue their own selfish interests and obstruction of justice contrary to their fiduciary duty to their clients, the banks have reconfirmed that they are indeed criminal enterprises.

And by condoning this latest appalling breach of banking standards, the Rule of Law, and of trust, President Obama, George Bush 41 and Mrs Barbara Bush et al are active participants in blocking the releases and in obstructing justice – a state of affairs that reflects a reckless degree of risk-taking arrogance that the Rest of the World has come to associate with the pariah nation called the United States of America, and which is liable to lead to a progressive degradation of international relations in the context of open economic warfare built on a substructure of the red-hot internal and external intelligence war which is in turn reflected in the irresponsible lies and diversionary reports churned out by notorious US controlled disinformation outlets.

NOW WE KNOW WHY THE TRUSTEES WERE ABUSED ALL WEEKEND
The foregoing throws new light on why the Trustees were kept at the banks from Friday 1st May through to Monday 4th May, when, as previously reported, a shoot-out occurred, killing two Federal officers. These tensions erupted because instead of allowing the Trustees to access their funds in accordance with their fiduciary obligations, the corrupt banks blocked access and embarked upon another round of exotic financing operations using the money that was now sitting ON THEIR BOOKS as base. In other words, when the releases finally occurred, they ‘pulled another one’.

As noted above, they must have been told that they could proceed to break the law; and this clearance to act illegally could ONLY have come from the highest levels. But as we all know, compliance with an illegal order does not absolve the perpetrator from responsibility at all. The banks that are acting illegally and are obstructing justice are legally as well as criminally liable.

THE AIR FORCE ONE EPISODE OVER MANHATTAN
The episode involving one of the Air Force One planes over Manhattan on 27th April now turns out to have been far more serious than has hitherto been explained, and can be read several ways, including the possibility that it may reflect a deep schism in the bowels of the US official structures.

Although F-16s always take up the lock-on position at the tail of the target aircraft, it is also true that when the fighter aircraft is directly on the tail of a target plane, that is a military position for a shoot-down. If the F-16’s Stinger missile had been released, the US President’s aircraft would have been destroyed. (There were in fact two F-16s present),

If that assumption is correct, the reason for the extraordinary manoeuvres of the Air Force One may have been that the presidential plane had to fly close to the buildings where the warmth emitted from the windows could interfere with the Stinger missile, which is heat-seeking.

On this analysis, the presidential plane shown in the videos was being lined up to be shot down by one of the F-16s, which, by extrapolation may have been given actual instructions to destroy the presidential plane unless it returned to the Washington area. The intention had been for the plane to land at LaGuardia Airport.

Although President Obama was reported to be elsewhere in the country on 27th April, he is known to have a double, thought to be a brother, who is slightly darker but can be ‘touched up’ with the application of those careful make-up skills deployed by the specialists hired from Hollywood for this purpose (see earlier posting). According to an unconfirmed report, it is possible that the purpose of the flight of the plane from the Air Force One fleet was for Obama secretly to attend a meeting at Citibank at which George H. W. Bush Sr. was thought to be present. Any such meeting would have needed to take place at the bank.

In which case, to take this hypothesis to its logical conclusion, the interception of Air Force One by an armed and primed US F-16 which actually locked-on to the tail of the presidential plane ready to shoot the plane down if it did not conform with the F-16’s instructions, provides empirical evidence of something being seriously wrong at the heart of the US structures, of the order of a colossal breach between warring elements – all over the money, of course.

Even though F-16s always ‘tailgate’ like this in such circumstances, the F-16’s behaviour conforms to classic military manoeuvres, indicating at the very least here that the ‘PR pictures’ report was a spurious and feeble, albeit brazen, cover story.

There is probably a link, too, to the shoot-out that occurred in the morning of 27th April, after the country representatives had been abused all weekend long, as discussed in our report dated 29th April – again, over money, or rather the blocking of the Trustees’ access by the banks.

An alternative hypothesis would be that the episode had something to do with shoulder-mounted missiles, some of which are of Russian origin, that were reported to have been brought into New Jersey, home of the seething US component of the Russian mafiya, who ‘want to be paid’ like the Chicago elements as well. On 12th August 2008, 3 men were arrested, one at Newark and two in New York, on suspicion of seeking to procure missiles for launching against US airliners.

That the episode on 27th April may have been related to the known concern over shoulder-fired missiles sounds less far-fetched when we recall the incident earlier this year of the scheduled flight that landed in the Hudson River without loss of life. The videos show that the two engines were damaged in a manner that could not possibly have been achieved by a bird-strike – the story that was quickly peddled to cover up what actually happened – which may have been that the plane was immobilised by one or more shoulder-launched missiles. The video showed a black SUV racing along the side of the river as the plane ‘landed’ on the water. In other words, a message may have been sent by the Russian mafiya that they expect to be paid, or nastier things will start happening.

THE CURIOUS MATTER OF THE BRIEFCASE UNDER THE TABLE
Sources who attended a very recent ‘conservative’ dinner meeting in Washington, DC, at which General John Singlaub, Ross Perot and General Petraeus were prominently on display, reported to us that a certain operative spent the dinner suddenly leaving the table to ‘conduct some business’, returning, vanishing again, and then finally disappearing altogether, during the event. On arrival at the dinner, the spook had brought a briefcase which he slid under the table where he was seated.

When, finally, this agitated individual left altogether and didn’t return, it was later found that his briefcase was still where he had left it under the table. Our sources advise that it was decided to open the briefcase. It contained nothing at all, with the exception of a bottle of liquid. Research reveals that the operative concerned is a distinguished US counterterrorism official and a sniper.

‘WEAPONISED PNEUMONIC OR BUBONIC PLAGUE’
A retired US Army medical expert advises that our first-hand report from Mexico City [1st May 2009 posting] implied to her that the outbreak appeared to involve Weaponised Pneumonic Plague. The Merck Manual states that it has a 2-3-day incubation period, followed by the abrupt onset of high fever, chills, tachycardia, and often severe headache. Coughing, not prevalent initially, develops within 20 to 24 hours. Sputum is mucoid at first, rapidly shows red blood specks, and then becomes uniformly pink (blood). Most untreated patients die within 48 hours after the onset of symptoms.

The authoritative source elaborated:

‘The only way they could have done this would have been using the advance preparatory team that arrives before the POTUS. The team would never have been suspected. Mexico City is the perfect medium for this purpose, having a high concentration of people (over 20 million++), poverty, lousy sanitation and health, and the stagnant air pollution that overhangs the city. I would suspect that the advance prep team would also have been required to check out the top of all the highest and medium-sized buildings (for likely sniper positions). They would have used the tallest buildings and worked their way to street level in order to gain maximum saturation so as to obtain the highest kill ratio, given the dense smog and pollution and heavy population density. They would most probably have used the exhaust systems and would have placed aerosolised delivery systems within them – all set with timers, of course. They would have to have been present in order to release the plague. The entire presidential team would have been on antibiotics so as not to arouse anyone’.

‘Yersinia pestis (Bubonic Plague, or Black Death, which is still found in rodents in the southwestern United States): who would suspect it? It is not the ‘flu. The ‘flu that is (or was) spreading across the United States could simply be a cover. They should spread out and try to find the delivery systems. These people are murderous and very evil, and extremely stupid. They are not the sharpest tools in the shed. They have to find the delivery systems before these operatives attempt to retrieve them’.

‘Bubonic plague involves the lymph nodes and severe swelling, whereas pneumonic plague is a variant but does not involve the lymph nodes so it is usually misdiagnosed, and is very deadly’.

Marc S. Griswold, a former Secret Service agent who was serving as the lead advance special agent for the US Energy Secretary, Stephen Chu, during the trip to Mexico in mid-April, and who travelled with President Barack Obama on his visit, confirmed in early May that the minor cough he contracted in Mexico developed into Swine ‘Flu. The agent’s close family members are among nine probable cases that were reported on 1st May to have emerged in Maryland, Another was a World Bank official who had recently travelled to Mexico.

Although Griswold recovered and was reportedly back at work at the beginning of May, the agent said that his illness severely strained his relationship with his brother; while his daughter, who was not infected, had to endure stares and mean jokes as rumours spread through her school about her father’s rôle in bringing the first cases of Swine ‘Flu to the region. Close friends were refusing to talk to him, after it was realized that he had infected his nephew and other family members.

Of course the real explanation for these reactions was suspicion that Griswold may have been one of the agents involved in releasing what may have been a Weaponised Biowarfare Agent.

As previously reported, samples of agents went missing from the US Army Medical Command’s operation at Fort Detrick, MD. Specifically, on 22nd April, US Army criminal investigators were reported by The Frederick News-Post to be looking into the removal of disease samples from the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases. The investigators are from the US Army Criminal Investigation Unity at Fort Meade.

Fort Detrick (USAMRID) is the US Army’s leading biodefence laboratory, where researchers study pathogens, such as Ebola, anthrax and plague. In February, USAMRID halted all its research into these and other diseases, following discovery of virus samples that weren’t listed in its inventory.

The Institute’s Commander, Colonel John Skvorak, ordered the halting of research while experts conducted a complete inventory of the Institute’s agents, which was not yet complete in late April when this information first surfaced.

FORMER U.S. HIGH OFFICIALS CONTINUE RUNNING ‘BLACK OPS’
Evil operatives and holders of high office like Richard B. Cheney, who is certainly involved in the present situation, are known to continue operations with which they were involved while in office. They believe they are entitled to carry on seamlessly with whatever they were doing or controlling before. This is the origin of the adage that there is no such thing as a ‘former’ operative. Cheney is thought to have ‘split’ from the Bushes since leaving office,

In addition, these people are operatives first, and holders of high office second: so the reason that they carry on seamlessly with their ‘Black Ops’ is really that ‘this is what they do’.

It is clear that George Bush Sr. is/was capable of anything, including crimes against humanity: after all, he was personally responsible, for instance, for the deployment of chemical weapons against the civilian population of Halabja, Iraq, in 1992, a horrific and unrequited crime against humanity.

There is little doubt that the reason, or a key reason, why Bush Sr. and probably former President Clinton, who ‘works for’ or ‘worked for’ George H. W.Bush Sr., remained ‘untouched’ despite the immense crimes that they have committed, was that they have all along been blackmailing the US Government by letting it be known that if crossed, they would be prepared to adopt ‘exceptional measures’, not excluding crimes against humanity. If the US structures were influenced by this hideous blackmail, they failed to understand that the blackmailer is in a weaker position than the blackmailee – since once the blackmailer has used his ‘weapon’, he is powerless. Which may very well now be the case with Bush Sr., a man as evil and dangerous as Adolf Hitler (Schickelgruber).

The good news is that Bush Sr’s. dementia is proceeding rapidly. The bad news is that Mrs Barbara Bush is reported to be intermeddling in Bush Sr.’s Fraudulent Finance affairs. The further very bad news is that Jeb Bush has been wheeled in to carry on where Mr Bush Sr. may be on the verge of leaving off. A former employee at Jeb Bush’s private residence in Florida revealed some time ago that the Jeb Bush home was encased in an aura of satanic evil.

WILD REPORTS BY ANONYMOUS UNPROVENANCED SOURCES
Wild reports from unprovenanced, anonymous US sources which cannot be trusted because the sources conceal their identities and co-ordinates, can be dismissed as consisting of the usual toxic mixture of fact and falsehood. As for the suggestion by an identified source that ‘Internet reports’ may contain disinformation, we object to being bracketed with cowards who post anonymously and therefore cannot be held accountable for what they publish.

And since the object of the exercise is to extract truth from the dense fog of disinformation and lies spewed out by the controlled outlets, it is inevitable that, from time to time, information may turn out to be unreliable. Few can avoid being deceived by these ‘Black Ops’ people sometimes.

But when other sources pick up our feeds, as has happened repeatedly recently, you can be reasonably sure that what we have reported first is accurate ‘to the best of our knowledge and belief’ at the time of reporting. Finally, on this subject, we do not read the anonymous sources.

On one issue reported to us as having been featured in such sources, we do have a constructive observation to make. It is known that much top-secret US military technology has been transferred, during and since the Clinton era, to the Chinese. The motivation for this TREASON, we suggest, is that since the United States (due to the corruption of its structures and top officials) could not pay the Chinese what was owed to them, high-tech US secrets in breach of US national security were handed over IN LIEU OF PAYMENT. This may have happened on several occasions, we suspect.

OUTGOING BRITISH M.E.P. BLASTS THE SHAM EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
During the almost (typically) empty final plenary session of the European Parliament before the European ‘elections’ in June, the Editor’s friend, Ashley Mote, Independent MEP for Southeast England, attempted to sum up, in the one minute allotted for such speeches in the rubber-stamp European Soviet (sorry, ‘Parliament’), what he thinks of that deliberate travesty of democracy.

This is what he said to the European Soviet on 4th May 2009:

‘Over the last five years I have watched in horror the EU’s endless, scandalous, institutionalised looting of taxpayers’ money’.

‘I have watched in horror an already overcrowded UK being deluged by hundreds of thousands of uninvited foreign workers who arrived for their benefit and to claim our welfare’.

‘I have watched in close-up a legislative system which permits anonymous bureaucrats to generate so-called law without any regard for the damage they do to the British economy and businesses’.

‘I have watched in close-up this expensive, ineffectual talking shop of a ‘Parliament’ masquerading as an illusion of accountable democracy – a monstrous deceit on the electors who sent us here’.

‘President Gorbachëv was right (2). The EU is the old Soviet Union, dressed in Western clothes. One day you will realise that you cannot be masters in someone’ else’s house’.

As usual, the few socialists and ideological federalists waiting their turn to speak tried to shout Mr Mote down, without any intervention from the Chairman, of course.

In doing so, they indicated that, as usual, Mr Mote had struck a few nerves.

Notes:

(1) The Directors of the named institutions were collated from the criminal enterprises’ websites on 6th May 2009. In each case, the name of the main institution is indicated only.

(2) This information reflects a comment made by Gorbachëv (real name Orbach, or Korbach) on a visit to London in March 2001.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. Some versions have a ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

IMF, WHITE HOUSE IN TRIANGULAR SETTLEMENT ‘SOLUTION’

SMOKE AND MIRRORS OBFUSCATION TO HIDE SOURCE OF FUNDS

Sunday 26 April 2009 03:00

• THIS REPORT WAS UPDATED 26TH AND 27TH APRIL. IMPORTANT POSTSCRIPT AT FOOT:
Updates are flagged in the ‘bullet point’ headings immediately below. A new report is pending…

• CALENDAR OF PERTINENT EVENTS FROM 8TH APRIL

• WHAT LIES BEHIND STRAUSS-KAHN’S CONFIDENCE IN RECOVERY?

• GOLD, CHINA, RUSSIA & BRAZIL’S $1.0 TRILLION TAKEN FROM DISGORGED BUSH LOOT

• RECONSTRUCTION OF WHAT APPEARS TO HAVE TAKEN PLACE

• UPDATE, SUNDAY 26TH APRIL: 5:00pm EST: TRIANGLE ALREADY COMING UNSTUCK?

• UPDATE, MONDAY 27TH APRIL: 9:30am EST: ANOTHER MURDER (IN THE BAHAMAS)
See under 23rd April in the ‘diary’ section of this report: Stanford-related liquidation.

• WHERE THE $1.0 TRILLION IS FEATURED IN THE G-7 COMMUNIQUE

• IMF ARRANGEMENT THOUGHT TO REPLACE THE LOMBARD ODIER SCHEME

• WITH CHINA OUT THE WAY AND THE WHITE HOUSE’S DEMANDS ‘SATISFIED’, WHAT NEXT?

• SENSE THAT ‘SOLUTIONS’ ARE DRIVEN BY LUST TO REVITALISE TRADING

• NEXT STEP: THE SETTLEMENTS, OR SOME OF THEM…

• THE LATEST OFFICIAL DERIVATIVES NUMBERS

• QUANTIFIED EUROPEAN BANK LOSSES

• UK TREASURY TAKING COSTLY LESSONS FROM BANKERS REPONSIBLE FOR THE CHAOS

• UPDATE: 27TH APRIL: 9:00pm EST: IMPORTANT CLOSING POSTSCRIPT. NEW REPORT PENDING… See at foot of this report above the standard Legal Notes that the crooks disregard.

• Operating the $ Refunding from London without US Government participation delivers:

(1) Massive ongoing windfall tax accruals to the BRITISH Treasury given that all funds resident in the United Kingdom jurisdiction for 24 hours are taxable by the Inland Revenue. This makes the UK Refunding proposal of extreme interest to Her Majesty’s Government and the UK Treasury.

((2) Massive ongoing windfall benefits to the UNITED STATES Treasury given that it will also receive a cascade of tax accruals from this independent private sector Refunding Program.

(3) The necessary refinancing of the UK and US banking systems ON THE BOOKS with no input from either Government and NO CORRESPONDING DEBT CREATED IN THE BACKGROUND.

(4) GOOD (i.e., on-balance sheet, taxed) money which will CHASE OUT THE BAD MONEY that the crass US Fraudulent Finance concoction will generate.

• In mid-March we published: International Currency Review Volume 34, #2 on Systemic Fraudulent Finance and The Legalisation of Financial Corruption. Also published recently are issues of our titles The Latin American Times, Economic Intelligence Review, London Currency Report, Interest Rate Service and Arab-Asian Affairs.

• For details, see the second white panel on the Home Page.

• To subscribe to our intelligence services, see the catalogue under World Reports Limited.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice is comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor’s study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the Internet Security Solution software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

• DONATIONS: You can help finance these exposures (which the Editor has to prepare on top of his normal publishing responsibilities) by sending us a donation. Press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

NEW REPORT FROM THE IMF/WORLD BANK SPRING MEETINGS STARTS HERE:

Washington, DC:

CALENDAR OF PERTINENT EVENTS FROM 8TH APRIL
In order to understand what we believe to have occurred with respect to ‘the Settlements’ as viewed from the Press Room here at the Spring Meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, we will first summarise what sources reported to us from 8th April onwards.

Bear in mind that given the secretive nature of financial and banking transactions, and of the behind-the-scenes operations of international institutions, plus the constraints arising from the priorities of national and international law enforcement and limitations placed upon access by investigative journalists to uncomfortable information, we caution that what follows represents what has been reported to us in the course of our normal enquiries, and that it represents the truth ‘to the best of our knowledge and belief’.

• 8th April 2009: Michael Wise, the former Chairman of Silverado Savings and Loan, was reported by The Denver Post [on 14th April: note the huge time delay] to have jumped from the 9th Floor of a parking garage at Tampa International Airport. This information was reported by Henry Poage, of the Hillsborough Medical Examiner’s Office. According to this source, Mr Wise drove a rental car to the ninth floor of the short-term parking garage.

The Medical Examiner’s Office ‘ruled that the death was a suicide’, explaining that a security video shows Wise pacing, before stepping off the side and landing in a landscaped area with palm trees and some greenery, according to Tampa International Airport spokeswoman Brenda Geoghagan. Wise was taken to hospital but died in the emergency room at 1:39pm. So we are to believe that a report which did not surface for a week after the event is accurate in all respects, even though if one were to be determined to commit suicide, hiring a car beforehand might be considered very odd, while surviving a nine-storey fall even into some greenery is highly improbable.

This ‘suicide’ must be considered in the context of the spate of Clintonesque murders that have been taking place, as the crooks try to ‘clean up the playground’ so that the massive unravelling of their financial criminality that is now in full swing will encounter as many ‘dead ends’ as possible. There are ‘connections’ with the death of Mr Wise that are believed to be spectacular.

• 15th April, 10:22 pm UK time: Notwithstanding that he is under indictment, George H. W. Bush Sr. was STILL attempting to move funds irregularly on this date, in response to which Euroclear was shut down so that anticipated or identified irregular financial movements would not take place. We speculated internally that this development might also be connected with a Chinese lien on funds.

• 17th April, 10:15pm UK time: It was reported to us that the Bush Crime Family had summoned a ‘top-level’ meeting in Texas, to which key co-conspirators with Bush Sr. and Dr Alan Greenspan, his chief trader, were invited. A significant number of Bush Sr.’s leading foreign co-conspiratorial assets who flew to Dallas or Houston for the meeting were reportedly apprehended at the airport. This meeting was believed to have been summoned because of the need to repatriate funds.

This is consistent with earlier reports of key parties falling below the radar. For instance, a Dallas-based broker-Trustee who had been in DIRECT and continuing touch with the Editor of this service for at least two and a half years, sending emails describing ‘imminent payment scenarios’ which were always disappointed, has not been heard from since 11th April 2009. On that date, he had commented very sensibly on the situation that seemed about to arise if the IMF had been minded to impede, on the instructions of the White House, the Editor’s press accreditation for the Spring Meetings. (This was the serious situation referenced in our reports dated 13th/14th April).

On 14th April 2009, the Editor sent emails to this contact, which bounced. Altogether, we sent nine emails spaced over a period of days, and they have all bounced. The return emails contain an NSA code which is intended to indicate that the contact was now prohibited from communicating with us. In other words, the ‘loop’ of information using us as the fulcrum had outlived its usefulness, and was closed down, implying some change or other in the overall situation.

This episode will be incorporated in a detailed but separate study on the innumerable deception techniques and operations to which the Editor has been subjected throughout these extensive investigations. More broadly, the closing down of this information ‘loop’, reaching straight back to Bush Sr., we have solid reason to believe, could be interpreted as a positive sign of progress.

Such techniques are used in intelligence to gauge how a particular deception is performing, and whether it should be continue or be modified. It was clearly felt that communicating with the Editor would facilitate the feedback that these people thought they needed, to see how far they could push their thievery. But following the G-20 meeting in the London area, the situation changed.

We should clarify here the earlier information about Greenspan’s latest arrest. It was specifically reported, and confirmed, that this crook had been arrested and was incarcerated for a 30-day period pending a hearing before a Magistrate Judge. It is possible that when our sources speak of ‘arrests’ at this level, what may actually be meant here is ‘apprehended’.

The fact that Greenspan reportedly delivered one or more speeches which overlapped the period of alleged incarceration is not material, as he has a speech-writing team and could have submitted papers before these events. However much one may dig around looking for further and better particulars, though, a veil is usually drawn over these arrests of such prominent operatives.

Neverethless, Dr Greenspoon, like Bush Sr., is reported to us to be under indictment. That’s what matters in view of what follows. In addition, following the G-20 jamboree, we received at least half a dozen reports of further extensive arrests, both in Europe and in North America.

• 21st April, 9.35pm UK time: It is reported that (a) ‘a lot more arrests’ have taken place during the day and possibly earlier, and that (b) George H. W. Bush Sr. and Greenspan intervened OPENLY to block settlement moves, apparently in the most brazen manner. The explanation given to us was that with Vice-President Biden in charge of the National Security Council, which tells the President of the United States what to do [see the preceding report], and Biden working with the Clintons who are close long-term collaborators (and simultaneously enemies) of the Bush Crime Nexus, Bush Sr. may assume that he remains inviolable, EVEN THOUGH HE IS UNDER INDICTMENT.

21st April: For the first time, the Editor learns that the International Monetary Fund has acquired a large volume of gold for smelting. (When the Fund acquires gold, it is smelted immediately). These reports, from impeccable sources, could not specify the SOURCE of the gold acquired by the Fund.

At the Spring Meetings, the Editor has attempted to ascertain the answer to this question, so far without success. Obviously, parallels with the stealing of The Queen’s gold on 29th-30th March 2007 suggested themselves, but after consideration we did not suspect there had been any such repetition: those involved got a nasty shock when that theft was publicised by this service, and the gold had to be restored. So the issue remained, for the time being, up in the air. Nevertheless, the Editor formulated the following question, which he had intended to attempt to ask the Managing Director of the IMF (but unfortunately, again, at a Press Conference on Saturday, the IMF convenor appeared deliberately NOT to call the Editor of this service). The question would have been:

‘What is the source of the gold reportedly acquired and being smelted by the IMF, and are IMF tax-exempt accounts being used to hide diverted or stolen funds, or have they been used for these purposes in the past?’.

• 22nd April 2009: The Editor learns that David Kellermann, aged 41, the Chief Financial Officer of Freddie Mac, was found dead by his wife this morning. The news surfaced on the US broadcast media at about 9:30 am EST: so at least, compared with the Wise ‘suiciding’ that occurred on 8th April but was not reported by The Denver Post until 14th April, no attempt was made to hold back this sinister news. But everything else that surfaced (and has not yet been publicised in the so-called ‘mainstream’ media), is distinctly sinister. Thus:

• Mr Kellerman asked for protection (i.e. he’d been threatened) but received only very light cover.

• Mr Kellerman was sent home for two weeks. (Reason: they couldn’t ‘get at him’ while he was out and about so they needed him to be in a fixed location, our informants advised us at the time).

• Mr Kellerman shot himself and after he had shot himself he hanged himself [sic]. This is a feat which not even Houdini in all his glory could ever have achieved.

First, Kellerman was reported to have been found hanged. However special information received from reliable sources by this service indicates that the was SHOT FIRST, AND THEN HANGED.

Mrs Kellerman informed local media that her husband had committed suicide.

• As you can imagine, there is far more behind this hideous event than has surfaced. Indeed, the imperative to prevent Mr Kellerman testifying to what has been going on, which can conveniently be summarised as THE WHOLESALE STEALING OF ASSETS FOR COLLATERALISATION AND TRADING PURPOSES, would appear to have been so intense that he ‘had to be liquidated’.

In March 2009, Freddie Mac disclosed that it was being investigated by the US Attorney’s Office in Virginia, and had been supoenaed for documents related to accounting disclosure and corporate governance issues back to September 2008, which was precisely when, as previously advised, the $14.0 trillion of assets belonging to sovereign parties was placed into ‘lockdown’ (between 10th and 12th September), followed by the ‘triple gunshot threat’ left on the Editor’s voicemail and the warning that the Editor should be careful on his forthcoming visit to Washington for the IMF/World Bank Annual Meetings in October 2008. Special protection was provided throughout that visit.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is also conducting an investigation into Freddie Mac, and has interviewed staff. A spokesman for Freddie Mac stated on 22nd April 2009 that the institution ‘knows of no connection between this personal tragedy and the ongoing regulatory enquiries’: which seems quite extraordinary, since what has so far been revealed is just the tip of the most immense iceberg in the Northern Hemisphere, we understand.

As indicated in the Update of 22nd April appended to our report dated 14th April, we are now in the Third Clinton Administration, with no checks and balances evident. The Clinton operatives have reverted to their usual form: liquidations. So far during the Spring Meetings, the Editor has heard no mention of the two ‘suicides’ referenced above, even though anyone who has not completely squashed their brains by sitting on them too hard must sense that these ‘Black’ developments are directly and specifically related to the headlong unravelling of the criminal finance Octopus.

• Note: Although the Clintons’ ill-gotten gains are believed to have been frozen (explaining why Bill is hardly rushing to the financial assistance of his CIA wife who has recently been described by another source as being more senior within the CIA than William Jefferson), they appear to have been attempting to use blackmail, the trade-off being ‘release our funds and we’ll cooperate’.

• 23rd April: We are informed that 147 key figures involved in the thefts and corruption have again been advised that they face indictment, and that NONE can rely on any prospect of immunity. This is the same number of indictments, or potential indictments, that were mooted back in 2007, but that went nowhere because of the usual high-level interference with law enforcement. However on this occasion, the information was accompanied by the following further elaboration:

• The 147 co-conspirators (including a large number of very well-known names) were told that if diverted funds were not ‘restored’ by close of business EST on Friday 24th April 2009, they would be arrested. We were separately advised that:

• Relevant law enforcement personnel (US Marshals) were IN PLACE ALL OVER WASHINGTON effective from 6.00pm on Friday 24th April, to effect the arrests. A large number of arrests was thought to be imminent, presumably if the stolen funds had not been ‘restored’.

• 23rd April: Hywel Jones, 55, a former Natwest banker, former prominent Director of the Bankers’ Association of the Bahamas and of the Bahamas Institute of Bankers, is shot in the back of the head by a sole gunman waiting in ambush outside the office of his offshore financial services company in Nassau, capital of the Bahamas. The ‘slim, dark male’ gunman escaped on a motorcycle.

On 25th April, Mr Jones, from Wales, was reported to be critically ill in a coma and was under police guard after having undergone emergency surgery.

It is believed that the bullet passed through his head. Mr Jones was arriving for work when he was shot. This is now thought to be a Stanford-connected liquidation. Recall that Stanford’s lone British accountant on Antigua, whose accounting contract with Stanford ended on 31st December 2008, died suddenly and mysteriously on New Year’s Day. There is speculation that Stanford International controlled some of the Japanese (Yamashita) gold.

There are no coincidences when imploding cascades of crimes unravel like this…

• 24th April: In the context of the US banks’ so-called ‘stress tests’, it has transpired that these institutions are now formally considered to be 100% liable for their off-balance sheet ‘assets’.

This ‘clarification’ has inevitably emerged because of the convoluted Geithner scheme whereby what are now suddenly being called ‘legacy assets’ are supposedly to be revalidated, following the devastating ‘shock’ delivered to the derivatives environment when interbank market liquidity, with the exception of drug money, dried up following the events of 10th-12th September 2008.

The problem that the designers of Geithner’s original scheme may not have factored in to their thinking in the rush to develop a formula which would enable the White House and its cronies to retain control of trading (according to the underlying thinking here) was that if those fraudulent assets are to be revalidated, the banks’ liabilities remain intact. (The same would apply even if, as we expect, Geithnerism collapses in ignominy, as there will be, as we predicted, few, if any ‘takers’ for repackaged ‘formerly toxic’ assets remarketed to restart the collapsed derivatives system).

Anyway, the upshot of this is that since the banks are liable for the fraudulent off-balance sheet assets, this means in practice that the off-balance sheet assets are in effect on-balance sheet! So this appears to be another case of shooting oneself and then hanging oneself afterwards.

But the situation has CHANGED during the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings as will be explained.

• 24th April: The Editor attends a Press Conference off the Press Room given by the Canadian Minister of Finance and the Governor of the Bank of Canada. The meeting was held in between sessions of the Group of Seven (G-7). The Editor was able to take the microphone, and asked why discussions at these meetings were focused on repairing a broken financial system by attempting to restore the integrity of ‘Structured Products’ (derivatives) which had been demonstrated to be worthless and fraudulent inter alia because there is NO RECOURSE to the underlying source of real money (e.g. from the original mortgagor).

• It was tantamount to repairing a collapsed building with faulty cement.

The Editor pointed out that the Bank of Canada (unspoken, of course: which was deeply involved in dodgy financial operations preceding this crisis) and the Ministry of Finance know perfectly well that derivatives assets are fraudulent. He concluded by mentioning that ‘there IS a straightforward solution: it’s called trading on the books’.

At this, the room erupted and the Governor commented: ‘I thought there’d be a question like this, which is why a representative from the G-7 is at this meeting’! The clear implication was that the Governor of the Bank of Canada knows all about the G-7-Approved private sector Dollar System Refunding Programme using sovereign LOAN funds referenced in earlier reports, which would reliquefy the banks ON THE BOOKS, deliver massive ongoing taxation accruals to the US Treasury (and to the British Treasury as this programme is to be run from London, and trading funds held within the UK financial jurisdiction for 24 hours are liable for UK tax).

However after these comments, the Governor reverted to his script consistently with the ‘line’ at these meetings, which is to avoid all references to Fraudulent Finance, Ponzi Schemes, criminal operations, diversion, the Bush Crime Family and stealing of funds, and the ransacking of private monies which these people know all about but which are taboo subjects in these refined circles.

• 24th April: The Editor is informed that key Trustees have been put ‘on standby’ for payment in the coming week, starting on Monday. This would be consistent with the requirement imposed on the 147 perpetrators for stolen and diverted funds to be ‘restored’ by close of business on 24th April. As of 9.00pm EST on Saturday evening in the Press Room, where this report was being prepared, the Editor had not received any information about arrests having taken place.

• FACT: What normally happens is that these sequences follow a standard pattern, and that when the payments are anticipated WITHOUT draconian action having been taken, as on this occasion (?), the payments are aborted. So, pending confirmation of remittances (which may well be quite hard to come by) it won’t be possible to tell whether this nightmare is indeed coming to an end.

• 25th April: HOWEVER, M. Dominique Strauss-Khan, the Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, told the media repeatedly on Saturday that ‘green shoots of recovery’ HAVE been detected and that the Fund’s view, thanks to substantial ‘progress’ which he says has been made at these meetings [see below], is that these will mature into signs of real recovery by around the third quarter, with tangible growth emerging in the first half of 2010.

WHAT LIES BEHIND STRAUSS-KAHN’S CONFIDENCE IN RECOVERY?
This makes no sense whatsoever in view of facts such as that a further five million foreclosures are anticipated in the United States in due course, with obvious implications for unemployment and consumption, while losses sustained to date arising from the crisis are now estimated in the many trillions of dollars. The Editor learned at one meeting, held in the IMF Governors’ Board Room, that the total value of new development contracts worldwide that have actually been cancelled since September last year exceeds $1,600 billion. And given the unprecedented contractions in real Gross Domestic Product predicted for the key European countries and Britain, these assertions from the IMF’s Managing Director fly in the face of all available evidence, even though the British Chancellor of the Exchequer used similar language recently (and was ridiculed for his pains).

GOLD, CHINA, RUSSIA & BRAZIL’S $1.0 TRILLION TAKEN FROM DISGORGED BUSH LOOT
So what on earth could M. Strauss-Kahn have been talking about? Here’s the likely answer:

(1) That the International Monetary Fund has acquired a large volume of gold which went for smelting very recently, has been separately confirmed by several key sources.

(2) The Wall Street Journal reported on 25th April that China, Brazil and Russia are to purchase the IMF’s first-ever bond denominated in Special Drawing Rights (SDRs). This is the IMF’s own unit of denomination, consisting of nothing but its name. It is backed by NOTHING WHATSOEVER. (Certain IMF statistics are denominated in SDRs, so that the poor analyst has to translate the numbers into dollars in order to get a ‘handle’ on what they mean).

• FACT: Assets denominated in SDRs will be as FRAUDULENT as the worthless ‘toxic’ derivatives with which we are familiar, since the SDR has no backing whatsoever and exists only in name. If, as we suspect, the intention is to launch this new SDR-denominated bond as a prelude to introducing a new generation of ‘asset’ which can be exploited along lines similar to the derivatives, the seeds have been sown for a NEW BUBBLE, which will implode just like the derivatives bubble.

And the IMF’s reputation and standing will be destroyed along with the SDR bond mountain that we believe is liable to take off as a consequence of this duplicitous ‘smoke and mirrors’ arrangement. The phrase ‘money laundering’ of course also springs readily to mind.

(3) Brazil is reported by The Wall Street Journal to be contributing up to $1.0 trillion which will be used to purchase these IMF Special Drawing Right-denominated bonds. BUT SEE BELOW…

(4) All of a sudden, the IMF has started signalling not only that ‘the worst may now be over’, but that global economic growth will be restored starting late this year and into 2010.

(5) China’s reserves of gold have risen very sharply, from around 600 tonnes, to over 1000 tonnes.

RECONSTRUCTION OF WHAT APPEARS TO HAVE TAKEN PLACE
It will be recalled that China, having obtained lien power from the World Court, demanded that the United States pay debts owed to it following the expiry of the 70-year maturity period of historical debts which the United States had reneged on and which may have explained the stealing of The Queen’s gold that we exposed in 2007, an operation that had to be aborted after our exposure, and the consequent restoration of the gold to its rightful owner.

Very recently, the Chinese declined to accept US currency or Treasuries, and tensions rose to fever pitch when President Obama reportedly ‘refused’ a Chinese demand that the United States must pay China in gold, a state of affairs that reconfirmed that China has lost confidence in the US dollar. China demanded that its payment must be ‘guaranteed’: and the only guaranteed means of payment is in gold. We therefore believe that what has taken place is the following:

• The large volume of gold recently ‘acquired’ by the IMF and smelted as always happens when the Fund acquires gold, has been credited for the account of CHINA, fulfilling China’s requirement.

• To satisfy the other side of the balance sheet, Brazil, as noted above, will suddenly be funding the IMF to the colossal tune of $1.0 trillion. This is FAR MORE than Brazil owns, which is why not a lot has emerged about this deal (certainly, nothing on that score that the Editor has been able to pick up in the Press Room and at the various meetings he has so far attended). So where has this huge sum of money suddenly materialised from?

• Answer: From hidden Bush Crime Family diverted and stolen funds stashed in Brazil.

In other words, the corners of this ‘smoke and mirrors’ triangle consists of China, the IMF and Brazil. Which helps to explain a number of recent developments, viz:

• The appearance of President Obama at the recent Organization of American States (OAS) meeting in Mexico, although of course this was a pre-arranged forum. But these meetings are in fact the outer face of what goes on behind the scenes. Deals were being done below the radar (including drug-trafficking and laundering transactions) as is always the case on these occasions.

• The fanfare with which the G-20 was ‘relaunched’ in London on 2nd April, when the Brazilian President Lula was seen hobnobbing with Presidents and Royalty at Buckingham Palace. All of a sudden, Brazil is on the map, but NOT for the reasons commonly supposed. No. The reason Brazil has ‘risen’ in the hierarchy of nations is that the Brazilian Government appears to have been very diligent in cooperating to freeze and confiscate the Bush Crime Octopus’s ill-gotten funds which have been accumulated in Brazilian institutions.

UPDATE, SUNDAY 26TH APRIL: 5:00pm EST: TRIANGLE ALREADY COMING UNSTUCK?
Notwithstanding the accuracy of the foregoing (reconfirmed to us on Sunday afternoon), the new arrangements to get the White House off the hook and able to exploit trading as intended, seemed ALREADY TO BE COMING UNSTUCK ON SUNDAY. Two days earlier, the Brazilian Finance Minister attending the Spring Meetings, Guido Mantega, apparently dismissed the substance of the Fund’s proposed sale of bonds denominated in SDRs as ‘insufficient’ and ‘premature’. However this was not revealed until the 26th, implying that the Brazilians had woken up to the likelihood that they have been pressurised to provide the third side of the triangle against their better judgment.

Should the Brazilians demur (which seems likely), the situation will be completely out of control since one element of the surreptitious ‘smoke and mirrors’ gold and money laundering operation will have been completed without the corresponding, albeit fraudulent, matching transaction.

Mantega was also reported by Bloomberg (on Sunday) as having said that any contributions by the four largest developing nations would be ‘provisional’, pending reforms that would increase their say in the forum of the International Monetary Fund. Because the United States is now beholden to these countries, the US Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner, said in a Treasury statement issued in the Press Room that he supports a ‘realignment’ of power in the Fund to reflect ‘the realities of the global economy’, along with a reduction of the number of IMF Board Members from 24 to 20.

That won’t please the Europeans, especially the British, one little bit.

WHERE THE $1.0 TRILLION IS FEATURED IN THE G-7 COMMUNIQUE
The ‘Statement of the G-7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors’ Meeting’ dated 24th April carefully included a reference to the $1.0 trillion, in a sudden outbreak of ‘transparency’. Actually, what we observe is ‘candour’, which should NEVER be confused with TRUTH.

The text states:

‘We welcome progress being made in mobilizing temporary bilateral financing for the IMF; this financing will be rolled over into the IMF’s New Arrangements to Borrow, which in turn will be increased by up to $500 billion and see its membership expanded. We will work to implement the $250 billion general SDR allocation, as well as to use the additional resources from the IMF’s agreed gold sales to support the poorest, consistent with the IMF’s new income model. We are implementing the initiative to provide at least $250 billion in trade finance’.

• Total: $1.0 trillion.

The next paragraph begins: ‘We welcome the IMF’s introduction of new facilities, such as the Flexible Credit Line…’. This is to be another element of the new use that is to be made of SDRs, involving monthly credit extensions which could be construed as inflationary and will certainly underpin the intended exploitation of SDR-denominated bonds/assets that we detect.

IMF ARRANGEMENT THOUGHT TO REPLACE THE LOMBARD ODIER SCHEME
It is further believed that our exposure of the Lombard Odier Swiss guaranteed insurance wrap arrangement which was to have been operated in conjunction with the known CIA operative or asset Warren Buffett, literally ‘blew’ that scheme, which may explain the apparent earlier intent of the White House and therefore the IMF not to respond to this Editor’s routine application for press accreditation for this Spring Meeting (which was in turn apparently ‘blown’ when we indicated that this would free up the Editor to criticise the IMF and the World Bank, which is quite hard to do if you are at the same time accepting their generous hospitality).

The present analysis criticises the arrangement that is identified here, but it should be borne in mind that the Fund jumps to the command of the White House, whatever may be alleged to the contrary. The World Bank is of course a creature of the White House, and is currently fronted by the rather competent but colourless CIA operative Mr Robert Zoellick. Listening to Robert Zoellick on Saturday, the Editor formed the view that he has a very good grasp of his responsibilities and brief.

Anyway, the point here is this:

• The IMF SDR bond arrangement, financed by disgorged Bush Crime Family money from Brazil, effectively REPLACES the Lombard Odier scheme which collapsed after we had exposed it.

• It is designed with White House approval (hence Lula’s recently publicised close association with President Obama) to provide the new platform which is to be used to launch the fresh generation of ‘assets’ which (we believe) will soon grow up ‘alongside’ revived ‘legacy assets’ until these have been ‘successfully’ transferred onto the US Treasury’s books, in exchange for the ‘new generation’ of exotic Treasury ‘legacy’ instruments’ with extremely long maturities, probably varying from 30 to 45 or even 50 years out into the future. But there will be no ‘legacy’, since the ‘Trashets’ exchanged for these exotic US Treasury instruments will have no value, just as the paper that replaces them will have no value (i.e. their backing will be spurious).

The idea that such trash will be ‘worth something worthwhile’ in 25 years’ time is deviant stupidity. Incidentally, Paul Volcker has told the President to his face that Mr Geithner’s arrangements are absolutely unacceptable and, by implication, fraudulent.

With the new IMF ‘Flexible Credit Line’ in place, the prospect and probable intention is for outside parties quickly to become involved as counterparties, so that the International Monetary Fund will henceforth become the central player in what we foresee to be a new generation of exotic funding which, as noted above, will be JUST AS FRAUDULENT AS DERIVATIVES given that Special Drawing Rights are backed by nothing at all, except the very favourable standing of the Fund, which will be destroyed when the Fund’s reputation collapses along with the prospective SDR bond bubble.

WITH CHINA OUT OF THE WAY AND THE WHITE HOUSE’S DEMANDS ‘SATISFIED’, WHAT NEXT?
If this analysis is correct, China has been dealt with and the Geithner arrangements are in the process, as a direct result of developments during the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings and the transfer of the huge volume of gold to China which we think occurred on 24th April, of being given the kiss of life, having shown (as we predicted) every sign of being stillborn. With the IMF at the centre of the carousel, revival of the derivatives sector so that these false assets can at least be transferred progressively onto the Treasury’s books as described, may proceed, and Mr Geithner needn’t be fired immediately. Paul Volcker, who made a number of very sober comments at the seminar that the Editor attended on Saturday, won’t be amused, but he’s not at the White House.

In particular, Volcker will be chagrined that the SDR, backed by zilch, is to become the new asset of preference, exploitable as was never intended, without any discernible steps being taken to back it by anything except the existing air which sustains it. No doubt Paul Volcker will be having further words with the President on this score. The IMF’s credit lines will extend credit based on NOTHING. And Volcker will doubtless be pointing out that even though the Oval Office and the Treasury will be associated with the Fund in this venture, that doesn’t make what is being proposed any less fraudulent. It simply incorporates the International Monetary Fund as an institutional co-conspirator in the blatant perpetration of financial fraud against future generations of Americans.

And to use the unbacked SDR as the lynch-pin for the refunding of the whole world seems to us to be inviting a catastrophe which, despite all the waffle that the Editor has so far listened to at these Spring Meetings, will, once again, NOT BE ANTICIPATED.

Because as with Geithner Plan Number One, the Treasury will be accumulating vast quantities of completely unnecessary debt which could be avoided if it were to come to its senses and permit implementation within the United States of the G-7-Approved private sector Refunding Programme using the LOAN funds provided for the purpose but which had to be withdrawn effective from 29th January 2009 because President Obama broke his signed, formal undertakings on that score: and so far as the sovereign lenders were concerned, 19 months of glaring, in-your-face, US criminalist abuse of their funds was enough, thank you very much.

SENSE THAT ‘SOLUTIONS’ ARE DRIVEN BY LUST TO REVITALISE TRADING
We have a distinct sense from all this that the exotic IMF arrangements outlined here represent compromises reached in order to astisfy the White House, rather than objective solutions that have been brought forward in order to meet the needs of the International Monetary Fund’s constituent government clients. This perspective is reinforced by the obvious fact that what is discussed for the consumption of the world’s press here is the front-facing information that is presented to the people, and which masks the sordid deals and trade-offs, that are reached behind the scenes.

This has been more obvious than usual this year, because on the several occasions when the Editor has so far been allowed to ask why he never hears words like Fraudulent Finance, Ponzi Schemes and criminal enterprise etc. mentioned, the point has been taken politely (for instance by the Governor of the Bank of Canada and also, separately, by the Finance Minister for Zambia) but then wholly dropped, with the rest of the answer focused on the ‘line’, which is all about how the Fund and the ‘rich’ countries are ‘responding’ to the crisis.

In other words, discussion of the criminal, fraudulent CAUSE of the calamity, and of the fact that this is a CRIMINAL FINANCE crisis first and foremost, rather than primarily a systemic crisis, is taboo.

And the reason for THAT is that the White House, CONTRARY to advice tendered by Paul Volcker, but of course influenced by the Clintons (for heaven’s sake) intends to reconstitute the carousel and the Fraudulent Finance operations, come what may. It is impervious to common sense. And its boss, the National Security Council, which controls the CIA controllers, tells Obama what to do.

NEXT STEP: THE SETTLEMENTS, OR SOME OF THEM…
Which leaves the Settlements, or some of them. Here we observe that the stimulus money that the President ‘fought for’ as though he was still fighting the election, HAS NOT MATERIALISED.

On 20th April, the Editor was informed that the US States were expecting to be paid stimulus funds that had been agreed upon, for them to finance infrastructure and other projects, as well as some welfare payments, and that the payments to the US States were due that week.

On 25th April, the Editor learned that Pennsylvania HAD TO BORROW $480 million, just to finance its immediate unemployment benefit obligations, subject to receipt of $18 billion pledged to it by the Federal Government, much of which is urgently need to fill an immense hole in its public employee pension arrangements, clearly implying that the payments to the US States had NOT taken place.

In some supermarket stores, there are hardly any customers. New York City diners that the Editor uses that were full of clientele even the last time he was in the United States in March, are almost empty much of the time. THE STIMULUS MONEY IS OR WAS, NOT AVAILABLE.

In the light of the foregoing developments (China out of the way and the White House having stitched up a variant of the Geithner Plan without in fact telling anyone), certain Settlements payments will probably now go ahead, and the States may finally get their delayed stimulus money.

Moreover the deliberate talking-up of the prospects for recovery late this year and into 2010 by Dominique Strauss-Kahn, in the face of quite appalling data and further shocks which can be seen lurking on the horizon, tells us that the Trustees who have been told to be on standby this time may actually find that they are paid and can ‘spend’ their funds.

We cannot enter into ANY second-guessing as to which categories of recipient may be paid, as it is not even certain that these deductions are solid (although as a first-hand, on-the-spot observer here in Washington, the Editor has a clear sense that they are). Quite apart from anything else, if there are any further problems, M. Strauss-Kahn is going to have egg all over his face in short order, so that any ambition he may harbour of succeeding M. Sarkozy will not be realised.

THE LATEST OFFICIAL DERIVATIVES NUMBERS
The IMF’s latest Financial Stability Report was not available from the printers but the Statistical Appendix was obtained. Table 4 shows that the notional value of derivatives contracts outstanding at end-June 2008, using Bank for International Settlements statistics adjusted for double-counting, stood at $683,725 billion, compared with $595,407 billion six months earlier.

Thus the notional value of these (actually worthless) ‘trashets’ rose by nearly $90 trillion ahead of the ‘lockdown’ of the $14.0 trillion in mid-September 2008 which occurred as the direct result of the advice we gave that the exploitation of the loan funds since 19th-20th June 2007 when they were first made available, was quite intolerable and should be made to cease by having the loan funds withdrawn. This advice was accepted. The rest is history.

As recently as the end of June 2006, the notional value of derivatives ‘assets’ outstanding, was $370,178 billion: so the volume doubled in the two years to mid-2008. Since the carousel stalled in mid-September 2008 (although compounding will have continued), the really interesting number will only surface into the public domain this time next year in the IMF data.

QUANTIFIED EUROPEAN BANK LOSSES
An IMF Working Paper which was the subject of the mentioned seminar, entitled ‘Financial Stability Frameworks and the Role of Central Banks: Lessons from the Crisis’, by Erlend Wlater Nier, shows quantified losses arising from the crisis attributed to banks in key European countries.

The figures shown are as follows: Banks in Italy, $2.4 billion; Netherlands, $12.1 billion; France, $25.1 billion; Belgium, $10.8 billion; Switzerland, $54.3 billion; United Kingdom, $61.3 billion; and Germany, $56.0 billion. It should be pointed out also that European banks are compliant with the Basel-II requirements monitored and brokered by the Bank for International Settlements.

Yet European banks (especially the big German and British banks) have accumulated even larger portfolios of rubbish fraudulent assets than even the US banks that we have described as criminal enterprises. How come, then, that the big US money center banks are not or have not been Basel-II compliant when some of the European banks which are in an even worse position, are compliant?

UK TREASURY TAKING EXPENSIVE LESSONS FROM BANKERS REPONSIBLE FOR THE CHAOS
One could go on for ever identifying the stupidities and aberrations of these people, but we’ll close with some revealing information published in The Times, of London, very recently, in an instance of the ‘mainstream’ here doing a first-rate job. The report revealed that the British Treasury is paying vast fees, thought to have exceeded $150 million to date, to the very bankers whose ‘irresponsible’ behaviour has resulted inter alia in the British Government having to increase its indebtedness in the space of the year to come, by more than the entire volume of debt incurred by the Government of the United Kingdom since it first started borrowing from the Bank of England in 1692.

Specifically, Deutsche Bank, Credit Suisse and Citibank have all been hired at enormous cost as advisers to the Treasury, suggesting that the Treasury has lost control and basically had no idea what was going on in its own bailiwick. The Credit Suisse team is based at Canary Wharf, the new high-rise financial sector development to the East of the City of London, but decamps regularly to the Treasury. Its team consists of at least 20 people. The Deutsche Bank team of four experts in Fraudulent Finance includes an Irish dealmaker who advised Barclays on its failed bid for ABN Amro. Credit Suisse and Deutsche Bank alone are believed to have scooped $100 million sterling equivalent between them, and separate fees are being shelled out to Citigroup, which had to be bailed out by the US authorities.

The impression to be gained from this exposure is that the British Treasury had no clue what was happening, and so was completely taken by surprise by the events of mid-September 2008 and their consequences: which probably explains why the British Treasury is staggered that a solution exists which has the capacity to reliquefy the banks without incurring any Treasury debt while at the same time delivering massive windfall tax accruals to the Exchequer.

• It’s called trading on the books.

• UPDATE: 27TH APRIL: 9:00pm EST: IMPORTANT CLOSING POSTSCRIPT:
As a general rule, when divisions arising at these international meetings are openly reported in the ‘mainstream’ media, the disagreements alluded to do not reflect the specific underlying tensions accurately. The cracks in the parched ground at the surface appear narrow, masking cavernous voids beneath. Such seems to be the outcome of the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings ending in Washington, DC, on Sunday, amid considerable dissension and acrimony.

Simply put, with at least $34 trillion having been stolen and diverted by the Bush Crime Nexus, nothing like the total has yet been recovered under Obama, who knew about this state of affairs long before the Inauguration, has had more than his first 100 days to impose his will on the grim situation and to remove all who have been standing in the way of the resolution, and has failed to deliver. Accordingly, the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings 2009 took place essentially in a financial vacuum. No mention whatever was made of these colossal thefts, and the Editor detected only one obscure hint of the criminal dimension – indicating with crystal clarity that the Fund operates in a virtual environment, the parameters of which are dictated (we know for a fact) by the White House.

For public consumption, the world’s press has got hold of the idea that the divisions between the financial powers that surfaced at the Spring Meetings concerned inter alia a failure to agree upon how to raise $500 billion in additional funding for the International Monetary Fund that was pledged at Gordon Brown’s G-20 jamboree at Canning Town, London, on 2nd April. It appears that over $300 billion has been ‘pledged’; but as we all know, ‘pledges’ and undertakings, following untold years of double-cross, lies and duplicity by the US Treasury, are devoid of all meaning. Deceit is catching, and, like pig flu, it’s become a worldwide epidemic. So far, no actual hard money (with the possible exception of a Japanese amount) has been forthcoming. It’s been all talk and very little action.

A second reported dispute that erupted during the Spring Meetings concerned the vexed issue of representation on the Board of the International Monetary Fund. Here, the open press reports, and the buzz in the Press Room, was that China, Brazil and India are throwing their new weight around by expressing reservations about their prospective and ASSUMED (by the United States and the IMF) participation in the exotic IMF funding arrangements described in part above, pending a full reform of their ‘quotas’ in the Bretton Woods institutions that represent their voting power, and an expansion of their status. The Times of London summed up the position, as perceived for public consumption, thus: ‘Along with other emerging market nations, China is reluctant to make bigger financial commitments in the IMF without being allowed a much greater part in decision-making at the Fund and its sister body the World Bank’.

Additionally, tensions emerged above the radar over attempts to persuade more countries to make one-off crisis contributions to the Fund’s resources, or to increase their existing commitments: the word ‘commitment’ in this unpleasant environment being meaningless: collectivisation is admired in theory by these brainwashed socialist ideologues, but resisted in actual practice when it comes to forking out hard cash. And really, since there’s a money famine, where’s the incentive?

And following years of the rampant, in-your-face corruption orchestrated by the Bush Crime Family (for DVD, Dachau) working hand-in-glove with his top criminal trader, Dr Alan Greenspan – with the Bush dimension of the DVD-controlled element of the CIA secretly financing the ‘Islamic Terror’ operation, while Greenspan, assisted these days, one suspects, by Rahm Emanuel, presides over the secret funding of the opposite dimension of the dialectic, namely the hardened Israeli Nazi war party – the whole world has been corrupted, and the dirty tricks and duplicity deployed by the US criminalist intelligence gangs are being replicated by other powers, notably the big emerging ones.

(Encouragingly, the new Israeli Government has just explicitly stated that it will not be so stupid as to attack Iran; but the underlying objective of getting the United States to do Israel’s dirty work in the Middle East, remains unchanged).

Some of the new ‘big players’, notably Brazil, still need training in how to recognise that they are being targeted by US ‘Black Arts’ operatives into making ‘commitments’ that they’ll come to regret. Thus, as soon as it became known (two days after the event) that the Brazilian Finance Minister, Guido Montaga, had expressed reservations (about the rôle assigned to Brazil as described in this report), we formed the impression that the Brazilians had got decidedly cold feet, having belatedly realised that they may have been dragooned into what will inevitably turn out to be a typical US ‘bait and switch’ stitch-up. If they have ‘twigged’ that they are being duped, they are learning fast.

Given the sophistication of routine US official duplicity, the rule these new powers should follow without deviation is: don’t make commitments or agree to anything with the Americans that you don’t feel comfortable with, which in practice means that you must have the ‘money in the bank’ before signing up for anything that Washington tries to stick to you. That may well mean not doing deals with these people at all, certainly not without a very long (Green)spoon.

In this connection, the ‘mainstream’ media got the entire dynamic back to front. Quoting the London Times one more time, ‘China, Brazil and India led developing nations in forcing through measures under which the IMF will sell bonds on world markets to raise additional funding as an alternative to some countries offering longer-term loans’.

In reality, the scheme to sell SDR-denominated bonds was concocted to complete the corrupt triangle described above under pressure from the White House which tells the IMF in general, and Dominique Strauss-Kahn in particular, what to do. And this White House is taking its instructions from Bush 41 and Greenspan. This information comes from impeccable sources.

• It is consistent with this Editor’s elaboration above that ‘developments’ at the Spring Meetings were driven by the imperatives laid down by the White House and NOT by the needs of the IMF’s constituent Governments. Which means that the IMF is PERVERTING ITS JOB.

Moreover since the basis of the putative arrangements is rotten, as described, it is NO SURPRISE that no sooner have they been deconstructed (by us), than they start to unravel. In this connection, not only have the Brazilians allowed their acute reservations and nervousness about being set up by the Americans to be known, but it has been specifically reported to us that the Chinese have been advised not to touch the IMF’s proposed SDR bonds with a thousand-foot bargepole.

Which of course probably means that the SDR-denominated bond scheme, like the Lombard Odier insurance-wrap scheme and the Geithner-Paulson-Obama operation on behalf of the ‘privileged’ to revalidate the moribund and dead derivatives sector so that the crooks can recover their currently unrealisable ‘value’, leaving future US generations holding the bag, won’t get off the ground either.

This postscript analysis is closing because the Editor is now suddenly in receipt of dramatic further information which will more conveniently be publicised in a separate report that is being started immediately. Thank you for your attention!

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. Some versions have a ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

SHARP INCREASE IN GLOBAL TENSION SINCE THE G-20

RELEASES SABOTAGED BY MERKEL, WHO IS THREATENED BY SARKOZY

Tuesday 7 April 2009 00:01

UNDERLYING ISSUES NOT EVEN MENTIONED IN THE COMMUNIQUE

• ‘NEW WORLD ORDER’ INVOKED FROM THE G-20 PLATFORM

• G-20 COMMUNIQUE SILENT ON THE CAUSES OF THE CRISIS

• EYES GLAZE OVER AT SIGHT OF OBAMA AND BROWN

• ‘FOR US THE WAR NEVER ENDED’, ETC

• GERMAN CADRES’ ANGER DIRECTED TOWARDS THE BRITISH

• SARKOZY AND MERKEL AT EACH OTHERS’ THROATS OVER THE RELEASES

• SARKOZY REPORTEDLY THREATENS MERKEL WITH ‘ELIMINATION’

• ELYSEE TREATY AND E.U. ITSELF THREATENED BY FRANCO-GERMAN BREACH

• BANKERS WHO STAND IN THE WAY POST-G-20 WILL BE ‘ELIMINATED’

• ROTHSCHILDS ‘DEALT WITH’ BY RUSSIAN AND CHINESE INTEL THUGS

• THE GERMAN-ORIGINATED ‘BAIT AND SWITCH’ ROUTINE

• U.S. POWER STRUCTURES MODELLED ALONG LENINIST LINES

• THE STRAIGHTFORWARD DRUG-TRAFFICKING TEST

• DRUG MONEY PROCEEDS AND THE INTERBANK MARKET

• THAT SEPTEMBER 2008 MONEY ‘LOCKDOWN’

• GERMAN MOLES INSIDE THE BRITISH OFFICIAL STRUCTURES

• CORRUPT TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS TO BE TAKEN OVER BY BRITAIN

• PROFESSORS CLIMB ONTO OUR BANDWAGON

• HYPOCRISY AND CANT IN THE G-20 COMMUNIQUE

• CRUCIAL FISCAL UNDERTAKINGS IN PARAGRAPH SIX

• THE PRIVATE MEETING BETWEEN THE QUEEN AND PRESIDENT OBAMA

• SUDDEN CHANGE OF LANGUAGE AT THE FED

• FED PUSH FOR EXEMPTION FROM STATUTORY DEBT CEILING

• FED NOW LESS CONCERNED ABOUT DEBT BECAUSE OF REFUNDING?

• THE POST-G-20 CIA ‘COLLAPSING’ OPERATION

• FULL G-20 COMMUNIQUE TEXT APPENDED AS NOTE 5.

• RECENT (OECD) TAX INFORMATION EXCHANGE AGREEMENTS APPENDED AS NOTE 6.

• MADOFF ‘VICTIMS’ LIST: Two reports were posted on 6th February 2009 containing the entire list of customers of Bernard L. Madoff Securities, Inc.. Because the list is so huge, we divided it into two segments: Clients A-N; and clients O-Z, plus a Miscellaneous Section. See: Archive. Our list is the easiest to load and clearest of the lists that have been reproduced privately on the Internet.

• We have just published: International Currency Review Volume 34, #2 on Systemic Fraudulent Finance and The Legalisation of Financial Corruption. Also just published are issues of our titles Economic Intelligence Review, London Currency Report, Interest Rate Service and Arab-Asian Affairs. For further details, please check the second white panel on the Home Page.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice is comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the Internet Security Solution software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

• DONATIONS: You can help finance these exposures (which the Editor has to prepare on top of his normal publishing responsibilities) by sending us a donation. Press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

• The CONTACT US facility is found in the red box throughout this combined website.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

• ‘NEW WORLD ORDER’ INVOKED FROM THE G-20 PLATFORM
Indicative of the supreme arrogance of the cabal of internationalists (globalists) who think they know best for the whole of humanity, the controlled British Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, inserted the keywords ‘New World Order’ in his tedious sermon at the Group of Twenty indulgence-fest on 2nd April. Manifestly, the intelligence operative who wrote that speech for him looks upon those who don’t sit on their brains with utter contempt.

It was Mr Gorbachëv (Orbach or Korbach) who recycled this World Revolution control-phrase in the late 1980s, and it was his clandestine ally, George H. W. Bush Sr., who trumpeted the phrase for the benefit of those whom Lenin called ‘the interested’ in the early 1990s.

The purpose of this gratuitous insult to our collective intelligence was to remind those whom Lenin called ‘the interested’ and their fellow-travellers that the G-20 bore-event was about progressing The New Underworld Order, by leveraging the consequences of years of purposely implemented Fraudulent Finance in the interests of the broader globalist agenda – a supposedly ‘Great Leap Forward’ towards an agenda that NOBODY in the world WANTS, beyond the tawdry confines of the controlled, self-important creatures who think they have a right to dictate how humanity should be directed, managed, destroyed, or all of the above.

G-20 COMMUNIQUE SILENT ON THE CAUSES OF THE CRISIS
The British taxpayer was reportedly lumbered with a bill for £50 million to pay for Brown’s globalist jamboree, which issued a Communiqué that conspicuously OMITTED any mention of the following keywords/phrases, thereby signalling with crystal cynical clarity that it did not address the issues underlying this criminal finance crisis:

• Derivatives or ‘Structured Products’

• Fraudulent Finance

• Criminal Finance

• Toxic Assets

• Legacy Assets

• Bribery

• Corruption

• Mafia/mafiya

• Tax evasion

• Drugs, drug-trafficking

• Inflation

• Hyperinflation

Thus the Communiqué SIDESTEPPED the issues that should have been discussed, in favour of bromides for the benefit of the gullible ‘mainstream’ media hoardes for whose ears the entire orchestrated charade was choreographed. The omission of ANY MENTION of these issues in the Communiqué reveals the total contempt of these people for the Press Room.

For days after this circus, the talking heads were still ‘analysing’ the ‘outcome’ of the G-20 meeting on the basis of the diversionary bromide-style Communiqué, thereby plastering the entire world with vacuous interpretations of what the ‘chosen’ operatives striding the revolutionary stage were imagined to have ‘agreed’ – without addressing the fundamental issues summarised above which are the keywords that these ‘analysts’ should have been searching for if they had been equipped with any discernment about what was going on.

• Update! Someone on The Times, London, has noticed that the Communiqué had NOTHING to say about Derivatives a.k.a. Toxic Assets a.k.a. ‘Structured Products’ a.k.a. FRAUDULENT FINANCE!
Writing in The Times, David Wighton argues that despite recognition by G-20 leaders that dealing with banks’ so-called ‘toxic assets’ is vital for the global recovery, very little was said about it in the official Communiqué. He adds: “Now that Mr Sarkozy and Mme Merkel have their crackdown on tax havens, perhaps they can show some leadership on more urgent problems”. [INCREDIBLE!!!!!!!!!!].

ACTUALLY, NOTHING WHATSOEVER was mentioned about Derivatives a.k.a. Toxic Assets a.k.a. ‘Structured Products’ a.k.a. FRAUDULENT FINANCE, because THEY ARE TRYING TO KICK-START THE CRIMINAL OPERATIONS and they don’t want the diverted press to focus on what they are doing. Furthermore, criminal operatives at the highest levels of Governments are vulnerable to EXPOSURE for their own participation in the ransacking of trillions of dollars.

•FACT: The REASON for the current ‘constipated’ state of affairs is that processes are in motion that threaten to entrap and expose VERY BIG NAMES; and everyone concerned is TERRIFIED that the lid cannot be forced down on the cauldron. That’s what the litigation referenced at the end of this report is all about, BUT IT’S MUCH, MUCH BIGGER than even the closest observers realise.

• MORE ARRESTS were reported to us in the afternoon of 7th April. This contradicts intelligence to the effect that anyone standing in the way will now, post G-20, be ‘eliminated’, but that does not preclude ongoing arrests of other co-conspirators and accessories to the fact of misdemeanours.
In fact, ‘liquidations’, we understand, have been ongoing for at least three weeks.

For (see below) the G-20 was a WATERSHED beyond which date the leeway shown to saboteurs in the past will no longer apply. It is surprising, perhaps, to hear of arrests still taking place. What is quite clear is that the Illuminati’s internal war, or the global financial intelligence warfare, has been ratcheted up to a much higher level of intensity. The G-20 event was probably the last time anyone on this foul stage crawling with rats is going to waste time trying to be polite. They had no choice on 1st-2nd April, because they were in the presence of The Queen, who is invariably very polite and is the epitome of good manners. But powerful operatives holding the highest official positions who have stolen vast sums of money and are desperate to avoid being exposed, are not about to waste time being polite, when they are so terrified of being fingered, and jailed for life.

EYES GLAZE OVER AT SIGHT OF OBAMA AND BROWN
The Editor had numerous better things to do than watch and listen to the wall-to-wall opinionated revolutionary internationalist propaganda drivel spouted by Gordon Brown, and has long since suffered from EGO (Eyes Glaze Over) at the sight of President Obama hogging yet another podium and lecturing the whole world, Fidel Castro-like, on what (unspoken) his DVD-CIA handlers want to eventuate. The arrogance of these controlled operatives who leverage power on the globalists’ stage is hard for normal people, let alone for jaundiced observers not accustomed to sitting on their brains, to tolerate.

But the silver lining here is that if these operatives continue thaumatroping (1) humanity with their sterile sermons, the whole world will soon be ‘switched off’ by this agitation, propaganda and self-regarding indulgence, which of course would be a Good Thing.

And indeed this is what will happen because if one fact is certain here, it is that these opinionated would-be jumped-up re-orderers of the world have no sense of proportion, no idea when they are overstepping the mark, and no inclination to cease and desist from their preaching of control-drivel for the supposed ‘benefit’ of humanity. Which of course is all very decidedly GERMAN.

The Dachau-based long-range Nazi strategic deception community behind the ‘globalisation’ thrust towards The New Underworld Order to procure German hegemony displays the one ineradicable characteristic of these people: an inability to know when to stop. This fatal characteristic was on display even as late as 1945, when Hitler was ordering his Generals to continue the War long after the remaining sparrows clinging to the few extant Berlin lamp posts knew that it had been lost.

‘FOR US THE WAR NEVER ENDED’, ETC
Which can remind us that the Nazi intelligentsia, who had decamped to the German Geopolitical Centre in Franco’s Madrid by 1942, were indifferent about the fate of Herr Hitler (Schickelgrüber), a criminal operative dredged up from the back streets of Vienna whom they regarded as expendable. On the contrary, they relished the post-Hitler prospect of implementing a sinister, gradualist long-range deception strategy epitomised by the phrase, found in the captured ‘Madrid Circular Letter’ (circa 1951): ‘Für uns ist der Krieg niemals vorbei’ (‘For us the war never ended’).

And as we have repeatedly elaborated, the other ongoing Nazi slogan of specific relevance to America’s predicament today was: ‘We shall build the Thousand-year Reich on the Ruins of the United States’ – a strategy expertly implemented by the DVD’s supremo in the United States, Dr Henry (‘call me ‘Henny’: no thanks) Kissinger, a disgusting quadruple agent who moved seamlessly from Princess Diana’s memorial service in Westminster Abbey to a nightclub that same evening where he was observed googling at a bellydancer.

President Obama despatched Kissinger and the Bush Family’s primary legal ‘fixer’ and former US Secretary of State James A. Baker III to Moscow in March to conduct discussions with the covert Soviets under Medvedev and GRU-Prime Minister Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin. They subsequently returned to the United States, it is believed, in the company of Gorbachëv, the former Andropov (Lieberman)-era head of the CPSU’s all-powerful Administrative Department and the chief long-range implementer of Andropov’s strategic deception strategy.

The use by President Obama’s handlers of Kissinger and Baker for this mission indicates rather clearly that the US political parties are of course two wings of the single Political Power – which is controlled by the ‘State within the State’ Intelligence Power under the heel of Bush Sr., directed in turn by the probable DVD supremo on the block, Dr Henry Kissinger.

It was this German Jew who persuaded the erstwhile pornographer Gerald Ford (a.k.a. Leslie Lynch King Jr.) to sack William Colby as Director of Central Intelligence and to instal, in his place, George H. W. Bush Sr., of like German Jewish background, thereby taking over the Central Intelligence Agency on behalf of the heirs of the Nazi Abwehr, Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst.

To ensure the ‘permanent’ allegiance of the CIA criminal enterprise (Bush Jr. referred to it as ‘our enterprise’) to the DVD, Bush Sr. later procured the renaming of the CIA’s Langley campus as the George Bush Center for Intelligence, which should read ‘George Bush Center for Terrorism’.

GERMAN CADRES’ ANGER DIRECTED TOWARDS THE BRITISH
Vituperative, uncontrolled fury emitted from certain quarters against The Queen and the British generally reflects anger at the reality that the Nazi DVD controllers are most decidedly NOT getting everything their own way ‘as we speak’. Some sources of these ignorant ventilations also fail to understand that France and Germany are basically interchangeable under the terms of the Treaty of the Elysée of 23rd January 1963, which is of INDEFINITE duration and specifically requires these two powers to reach quote ‘an analogous position’ unquote ahead of every international meeting involving both powers, in perpetuity.

Therefore, while Sarkozy and Merkel are at loggerheads (see below), they are simultaneously bound by the terms of that never-ending bilateral treaty, which is why they always pontificate IN UNISON against ‘the Anglo-Saxons’ (another piece of egregious nonsense) whenever one of these set-piece New World Order theatres is to be staged at some place near you (2).

SARKOZY AND MERKEL AT EACH OTHERS’ THROATS OVER THE RELEASES
Since the G-20 meeting, tensions between Sarkozy and Merkel are reported to have reached close to boiling point. We have been informed that President Obama did sign a document at that event requiring the releases to proceed – and that President Sarkozy was perhaps unwisely mollified by this development, so that he was able to set aside his earlier threat to implement his planned walk-out should the ‘deliverables’ not be forthcoming. That threat, it will be recalled, had been directed against the US President.

So one can imagine President Sarkozy’s unrestrained fury when he discovered, subsequent to the G-20 meeting, that Mr George Bush Sr.’s agent, Chancellor Angela Merkel, who has been bribed by Bush Sr. for about five years to stand guard over his accumulated ill-gotten gains stashed within the German financial system, has continued to stand in the way of the releases since 2nd April.

• STASI operative Merkel of course implements strategy and tactics dictated to her by the Nazi strategic deception continuum, Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst, Dachau, as well.

• SARKOZY REPORTEDLY THREATENS MERKEL WITH ‘ELIMINATION’
Given this stand-off, the apoplectic Sarkozy, who now hates the Bushes with a vengeance because (typically) he was double-crossed by George Bush Sr., is reported to have threatened Chancellor Merkel with ‘elimination’ if she continues to block the settlements, which is what she is reported to be doing. Specifically, Sarkozy is reported to have told the German Chancellor: ‘You have to do this, or you’re going to be gone’.

This huge breach between the Treaty of the Elysée partners has now become so extreme, that it threatens to scupper not just the 1963 bilateral Treaty of the Elysée, which is the foundation stone of forced ‘European unity’ itself, but also the cohesion of the German Nazis’ long-range entrapment strategy, the European Union Collective, which is based upon the structure mapped out in the Nazi document Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft (European Economic Community) published in Berlin in 1942, as previously (and repeatedly) reported by this service (3).

• ELYSEE TREATY AND E.U. ITSELF THREATENED BY FRANCO-GERMAN BREACH
The irony is that while Chancellor Merkel is implementing DVD blocking tactics, to sabotage the releases, she is also taking the risk that her intransigence in deference to the DVD and Bush Sr. will in fact rip the Elysée Treaty and therefore the European Union apart, thereby destroying the framework for German regional hegemony strategy – another instance of the German Nazi habit of always going too far.

A further irony here is that if Chancellor Merkel persists with her blocking behaviour, unless she is eliminated as Sarkozy has threatened, she will be doing us and the whole world an immense favour by perversely dismantling the insidious entrapment structure developed by the wartime Nazis and the German Geopolitical Centre in Madrid which has almost brought Britain to its knees.

BANKERS WHO STAND IN THE WAY POST-G-20 WILL BE ‘ELIMINATED’
The post-G-20 situation is meanwhile associated with a heightening of the intensity of the ongoing Illuminati bloodbath arising from this self-inflicted crisis. Hitherto this bloodletting has continued at a relatively subdued level, with banking sector saboteurs being ‘apprehended’ or arrested, rather than necessarily liquidated. But since the G-20 meeting, sanctions for any failure to cooperate as required have been sharply escalated. We understand that no leeway or mercy will now be shown, and that these sanctions are already being applied.

This is why we are now authoritatively advised that crooked bankers (and probably also corrupt Trustees) who sabotage any element of the post-G-20 financial release procedures will no longer simply be arrested, but will be ‘eliminated’ on the spot – by which is meant that they will be shot dead on sight, or else will be ‘zapped’ so that they suffer a heart attack.

Taken in the context of President Sarkozy’s reported threat that Chancellor Merkel will herself be ‘eliminated’ if her intransigence in blocking the settlements continues, we can now see that, post-G-20, the temperature and the level of international tension has been significantly raised – and that the G-20’s decisions are being perversely sabotaged by Germany.

This was probably inevitable, since tensions were already extremely high prior to the G-20 meeting, as witnessed by Sarkozy’s threat to walk out if the ‘deliverables’ were again impeded. So, having been through that ghastly meeting and having been deceived into believing that agreement to proceed with the releases had been reached, President Sarkozy feels bitterly betrayed by his own supposed ‘ally’, to whom he is supposed to be bound until the end of the solar system by the 1963 perpetual Treaty of the Elysée.

On the basis of past experience, this further satanic theatre of the absurd may just represent yet another instance of the dialectical game that these criminal operatives play, whereby yesterday’s identified villain is today’s beneficial influence, and tomorrow’s villain is a third party we hadn’t previously thought of. On the other hand, something tells the Editor that these new developments represent a very serious escalation of international tensions, exacerbated by fury at the objective fact that these ‘leaders’ assembled at great inconvenience and big expense to appear en masse in Canning Town with false smiles all round, only to find afterwards that the somewhat arrogant and disliked STASI-Chancellor Merkel was sabotaging part of the secret outcome of their meeting.

In particular the Editor was singularly impressed by the fact that as soon as he mentioned the intelligence, obtained from another source, that bankers standing in the way of the releases post-G-20 would be IMMEDIATELY ELIMINATED, this was instantly confirmed as accurate by a respected informant who could not have revealed it unless it had been mentioned by the Editor first.

• We were told: people who stand in the way will find that ‘they didn’t get to go home’.

In this connection, it is understood that two senior Directors on the Board of Citibank/Citigroup were ‘eliminated’ last week. When the Editor enquired whether this implied what he assumed it meant, the answer was in the affirmative; and the sources elaborated that ‘we think that they were zapped in some manner and suffered heart attacks’.

ROTHSCHILDS ‘DEALT WITH’ BY RUSSIAN AND CHINESE INTEL THUGS
Intelligence input received by this service also confirms that, standing in front of the Bush-Clinton-DVD-CIA Criminal Nexus, the three parties that have sabotaged the releases and the ‘final solution’ of this infernal Illuminati warfare all along have been the Rothschilds, the Connecticut Trust group of Trustee operatives, and Citibank. According to certain Jewish sources, no less, the Rothschilds’ behaviour has been dictated by their unwillingness to ‘lose their control’, or at least the degree of control to which they have been accustomed for generations.

Either during or shortly after the G-20 display in Canning Town, Russian and Chinese intelligence operatives (collaborating together under their long-range cooperative alliance) travelled to Paris, where they advised the Rothschilds there, that their ‘time is up’ and that they are required to yield. We were unable to establish why it was necessary for the Russians and Chinese to do this in Paris, given that the Rothschilds are headquartered these days in London. But it was stressed that the visit was not exactly a ‘friendly’ encounter.

And as previously noted, the Connecticut Trust group of Trustees, working for George Bush Sr., have indeed been in the habit of waiting for each successive attempt to procure the releases to be announced, attending at the relevant bank at the appointed date and time, creaming off the profit, and distributing it to designated recipients, as a consequence of which very large sums of money have accumulated in the bank accounts in question.

Further corrupt activity along these lines by these people will, we understand, result in them being summarily executed, like any bankers that may be foolish enough to persist, post-G-20, in standing in the way of resolution. A number of such Trustees have been ‘disposed of’ in the past after they got ‘too greedy’, but in the post-G-20 environment, no leeway is going to be allowed at all – which means that if this satanic impasse continues, we are going to see a number of bankers shot dead or ‘zapped’ in their offices, and Trustees gunned down at point blank range in the street.

As for Citibank, it seems that our early description of this institution as a criminal enterprise was a grotesque understatement on our part.

SECOND PHASE OF THE ICELANDIC LEG OF THE OCTOPUS ‘BLOWS’
The British press confirmed on 6th April 2009 that Iceland has hired Eva Joly, a Norwegian-French investigating magistrate who specialises in preparing complex fraud prosecutions, to advise the investigators and identify evidence of corruption. It will be recalled that the Bush Crime Family had been using Iceland as a laundering centre for elements of its Fraudulent Finance operations, and that the entire Icelandic financial system and the Icelandic krona went into meltdown last October after the Government had been forced to seize Kaupthing, Landsbanki and Glitnir, the country’s largest banks. Clearly, the Icelandic meltdown was an immediate consequence of the drying-up of liquidity in the system following the ‘lockdown’ event on 10th-12th September 2008 [see below].

The Daily Telegraph reported that a source close to the investigation said:

“We need serious help from Europe and the United Kingdom and tax havens to deal with the international aspects of this because it looks like there was a very elaborate network of crossholdings and money flowing overseas. It’s absolutely mind-boggling”.

It also looks as though the Icelandic authorities could benefit by a closer study of the background to their troubles, which they may not have understood, at the outset anyway: and that a good place for them to start might be with this website service.

THE GERMAN-ORIGINATED ‘BAIT AND SWITCH’ ROUTINE
The Franco-German Treaty of the Elysée was promoted by Dr Konrad Adenauer, the former Nazi-era Mayor of Cologne and friend of Schickelgrüber’s favourite German Jewish bankers, Drs Abs and Pferdmenges. Chancellor Adenauer is notorious for having told the Bundesrat that ‘we must never let the West know that our true orientation lies to the East’ – reflecting the historical realities that Nazism (National Socialism) and Communism (International Socialism) are dialectical twins and that German intelligence was resident inside the Kremlin (as it has been inside the White House and Downing Street) for many years: which explains the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact, and why the Nazis alternated between alliance with the German asset Josef Stalin (who weakened Russia by liquidating the officer corps) and attacking Russia, like rats in a sack. Among these Luciferian beings, loyalties and allegiances are strictly ephemeral, expendable, replaceable, and perfunctory.

The same has always been true of the DVD operative Mr George H. W. Bush Sr., whose modus operandi has invariably been the ‘bait and switch’ technique of turning on his trading partners (Saddam Hussein, Misolevic, Noriega, Sarkozy) as soon as they become too powerful, inciting his monumental lust and jealousy. Indeed the ‘bait and switch’ technique is quintessentially Leninist: and since the United States is in fact structured just like an overt Marxist-Leninist state, this should come as no surprise, either.

U.S. POWER STRUCTURES MODELLED ALONG LENINIST LINES
All overt Communist states have a ‘Security Council’ which is superior to the Government itself – the same model as is evident in the United States, where the National Security Council (NSC) appears to be subordinate to the Presidency but in fact tells it what to do.

In other key respects, too, the US control structure is identical to that of overt Communist régimes – with the standard power triangle consisting of the Intelligence Power (the ‘State within the State’), which is answerable to no-one, supposedly balanced by the Military Power (which it controls) and the Party (which it also controls, and which in the United States is divided into the two dialectical false ‘opposites’, Republican and Democrat).

That the Party is ONE is evident from the seamless interaction between the two wings – so that President Obama has no problem sending his supposed Republican ‘rivals’ Kissinger and Baker to Moscow to talk with the other false dialectical World Revolution ‘opposites’, the covert Soviets.

THE STRAIGHTFORWARD DRUG-TRAFFICKING TEST
If we step back for a moment to reflect on the staged propaganda delivered to the world by Messrs Brown and Obama in recent days, we can short-circuit queries about the bona fides of these two characters quite simply. The elementary way to establish whether Obama and Brown are genuine or controlled (a simple test that applies to everyone else on the stage as well), is to ask (even though we all know the answer):

• Has President Obama ordered the CIA to get out of drug trafficking?

• Has Prime Minister Gordon Brown ordered Government Operations-2 (GO-2) within MI6 to get out of drug distribution via its control of the two drug cartels distributing drugs in the United Kingdom, and its financing of the main political parties using drug money proceeds?

Of course the answer to both questions is no. By extension, we can further ask the subsidiary question: are they serving the interests of the American/British peoples, or not? And again the answer has to be: they can’t be, otherwise this would be their top priority, wouldn’t it. In that case, if they aren’t serving the interests of their populations, they must be serving some other interest – namely, of course, the internationalist One World Agenda, operating CONTRARY to the interests of the nation state, which it seeks to obliterate. Since the nation state is the natural human condition and has been found to serve the preferences and interests of human beings best, it follows that the One World Agenda does not meet the requirements of human beings, and can never do so.

France, Germany, China, the ‘former’ Soviet Union, Israel and other countries are also in the drug business: but that’s not the point. The issue is: do our leaders serve our interests?

And clearly, since they preside over Governments that are engaged in satanic operations (drug-trafficking and distribution) the purpose of which is to make money out of destroying people’s lives, they most certainly do not.

If Brown and Obama had stood on that Canning Town platform and condemned drug-trafficking and the participation of their own structures in this heinous activity, one might have been excused for perhaps taking them seriously.

And there are plenty of other devilish government-sanctioned activities to which they should be opposed, as well. But since neither of these ‘leaders’ condemned them – making no mention of any of the foregoing fundamental causes of the criminal finance crisis, which is degrading the whole world, in their pompous globalist dirges – neither of these two operatives should command our respect: except that President Obama is Head of State and, as previously mentioned, whatever the personality occupying this position, he or she must command a degree of deference because he or she represents the people who are, or ought to be (but are not), sovereign.

In 2005, a US operative said to the Editor of this service: ‘Don’t attack the drug operatives, or they will kill you’. Oh, so the problem is insoluble, is it? It can’t be resolved because anyone standing up to them will be murdered? President Obama cannot be expected to do the right thing because it’s too dangerous? Brown, ditto?

• Here’s a consideration for your attention. We have just broken this taboo. Would good people who may be reading this report care to join in? By all means reproduce what we have published here: be the Editor’s guest.

DRUG MONEY PROCEEDS AND THE INTERBANK MARKET
Now you will doubtless recall that, as previously reported by this service, the Executive Director of UNODC, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Sr. Antonio Maria Costa, was interviewed in the January 2009 issue of the Austrian journal Profil, and that in that interview he stated that in the second half of 2008 (a period which we think extended from mid-September onwards: see below), the ‘only new liquidity’ in the interbank market was drug money.

The other sources had been closed off – especially the illegal and corrupt misuse of the $14.0 trillion funds, including the Queen’s LOAN money within a total of $6.2 trillion that had been made available to finance the private sector on-the-books Refunding Programme which is the SOLUTION to the crisis, as agreed by the Group of Seven leading financial powers in June 2007, when The Queen appealed for this transparent trading to proceed ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’. The G-7 re-approved the private sector, revenue-generating refunding of the US Dollar System in 2008.

THAT SEPTEMBER 2008 MONEY ‘LOCKDOWN’
Following advice given and the steps taken at the beginning of September 2008, these funds (the entire $14.0 trillion) were placed into ‘lockdown’ between 10th and 12th September 2008, so that they could no longer be illegally exploited to finance the carousel, as previously explained. It was then only a matter of time before the Bush Crime Family-linked Madoff Ponzi scamming machine ran into severe trouble, in the context of the reported $7.0 billion of redemptions.

(Obviously it didn’t help that, according to The Jerusalem Post, Madoff had transferred $35 billion to the Israel Discount Bank via 181,000 separate wire transfers in the names of individual investors between March 2004 and the same month a year later) (4).

When ‘Sir’ R. Allen Stanford realised what was happening, he started to arrange for monies to be diverted from his various bank accounts – a state of affairs known to his one-man Antigua-based accountant, whose contract with Stanford expired on 31st December 2008. The accountant died suddenly on 1st January 2009.

From the information about drug money flows implied and given above, it can be assumed that one reason why the Great Powers do nothing whatsoever to terminate their structures’ drug-trafficking operations (except via token programmes designed to deflect criticism for public consumption) is that the resulting money flows lubricate the interbank market.

Which of course ties the banks, which are criminal enterprises, into the drug-trafficking business – explaining the corruption of the banks, which is justified on the basis of the argument that banks are neutral institutions which simply handle money flows.

Therefore, attempting to impose discipline and ‘standards’ on banks while Governments continue to sponsor and indulge in drug-trafficking, represents yet another display of the familiar duplicitous double-mindedness with which we have become familiar as we steadily strip the putrid layers of criminality off the legs of the criminal Octopus.

GERMAN MOLES INSIDE THE BRITISH OFFICIAL STRUCTURES
As in the United States, agents for the long-range Nazi strategic deception apparat are buried deep inside the UK structures, such as the Cabinet Office, the Treasury, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, the UK Ministry of Defence, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and the Department for Work and Pensions.

For instance, the ‘Europe Minister’, a ‘Blair Babe’ called Caroline Flint, said at the beginning of April that every operational unit of the British Army, the Royal Navy and the Royal Air Force will soon be available to fight under the EU flag in future wars ‘as part of an EU ‘force catalogue’’. Such crass, revolutionary anti-nation state abominations perpetrated by brainwashed political puppets proceed even as the German operation to entrap its Member States, most importantly Britain, is running into the sand as discussed above – reminding us that the EU is a deliberately structured ‘automaton’ which may keep on functioning long after its underpinning foundations have collapsed beneath it.

Moreover key personnel at the Bank of England have also been instrumental in furthering the long-range Abwehr strategy, whether ‘on the payroll’ or due to blackmail or other satanic pressures.

Thus a key figure at the Bank is a known de facto German agent, with an offshore bank account with Henry Ansbacher, British Virgin Islands (which harbours about 400,000 offshore corporations, the documents for which are stored in a concrete building there).

This crucial information emerged following the previously reported seizure by 300 heavily armed Metropolitan Police of the ‘Safety Lock Boxes’ in Mayfair, Edgeware and Hampstead on 2nd June 2008, as previously reported. ‘Payroll’ funds paid to this corrupt de facto agent for the DVD are believed to be siphoned via Deutsche Bank and UBS to the named bank in the British Overseas Territory, for the beneficiary whose account is in the name of Passenham.

CORRUPT TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS TO BE TAKEN OVER BY BRITAIN
In this context it is to be noted that the British Government is now in the process of bringing in legislation at Westminster, following a Commission of Inquiry headed by a British Judge, Sir Robin Auld, to suspend the Constitution of the Turks and Caicos Islands, to remove the Government and Cabinet, to close the single-camera House of Parliament (the House of Assembly) and to assume direct rule under the control of the Governor for an initial period of two years, in order to get to grips with the rampant corruption throughout the Territory‘s structures that the Commission has uncovered. The draft Order-in-Council to put this process into effect was submitted to Her Majesty The Queen in Council on 18th March and was laid before Parliament on 25th March. On the basis of current information, the takeover is expected to come into effect late this month.

Our Latin American service, The Latin American Times [Volume 20, Number 9], to be published in May 2009, will be devoted to this development.

PROFESSORS CLIMB ONTO OUR BANDWAGON
The Editor’s experience all his reporting life is that we stick our necks out in anticipation of what will take place. What we predict then takes place. Many months, perhaps even a year or more later, academics too timid to run the risk of sticking their necks out realise that what was predicted has indeed taken place. They then proceed to muscle in and to pontificate on the subject, having failed to anticipate what was coming down, but now, with the benefit of hindsight, claiming 100% of the credit for their ‘wise prognostications’ for themselves.

Current instances of this syndrome include pronouncements by the Nobel Laureate (therefore by definition, ‘prescient’) economist Joseph Stiglitz, and Professor K. Black, a Professor of Economics and Law with the University of Missouri:

• Dr Joseph Stiglitz, 3rd April 2009: ‘The Obama Administration’s $500 billion or more proposal to deal with America’s ailing banks has been described by some in the financial markets as a win-win-win proposal’, Stiglitz writes in The New York Times.

‘Actually, it’s a win-win-lose proposal: the banks win, investors win, and taxpayers lose’.

The (Geithner) proposal is ‘marked by overleveraging in the public sector, excessive complexity, poor incentives and a lack of transparency’, Stiglitz says.

‘The Government plan in effect involves insuring almost all losses. Since the private investors are spared most losses, then they primarily ‘value’ their potential gains’.

• Professor William K. Black, 5th April 2009: In an interview on the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) Bill Moyers Journal, William K. Black, Professor of Economics and Law at the University of Missouri, alleged that American banks and credit agencies conspired to create a system in which so-called ‘liars’ loans’ could receive AAA ratings and zero oversight, amounting to a truly massive FRAUD at the epicentre of American finance. But worse still, claimed Dr Black, Timothy Geithner, President Barack Obama’s Secretary of the Treasury, is currently engaged in a cover-up to keep the truth of America’s insolvency from its citizens’.

We can’t be bothered right now to sock you all of Professor Black’s prognostications: but if you have time to track them down on the Internet, you may, uh, come across a good deal of ‘thinking’ that you’ll instantly ‘recognise’ from your very assiduous reading of these reports and, if you are a subscriber, from your study of our analyses in successive issues of International Currency Review.

• For all of the above, please see these reports and successive issues of our journals, passim.

HYPOCRISY AND CANT IN THE G-20 COMMUNIQUE
The G-20 Communiqué (5) recycled the phrase that has been repeatedly used by Prime Minister Brown and his beleaguered and somewhat baffled Chancellor of the Exchequer, Alastair Darling, namely that ‘we have today pledged to do WHATEVER IS NECESSARY’ to:

• Restore confidence, growth, and jobs [unspoken: that we have destroyed by permitting and indulging in Fraudulent Finance];

• Repair the financial system [unspoken: that we have destroyed ditto] to restore lending;

• Strengthen financial regulation [unspoken: in order to regain former control over what our own permissive behaviour allowed to get completely out of control] to rebuild trust [unspoken: which our wayward, wilful and reprobate Fraudulent Finance behaviour, corruption, lies and systematic deception may have permanently destroyed];

• Fund [unspoken: using stolen and diverted funds and money created from the illicit use of other people’s money such as that of The Queen, in defiance of the legal principle that ‘the money you make from your illicit use of my money is my money’] and reform [unspoken: which we have been talking and doing not a lot about for years] our international financial institutions to overcome this crisis [unspoken: of our own making] and prevent future ones [unspoken: that is to say, crises of our own making that run beyond our control, like this one];

• Promote global trade and investment [unspoken: because we realise that in our greed and in pursuit of our secret agendas, we have come close to destroying ‘our global economy’, ‘globalism’ and therefore our planned route towards The New Underworld Order] and reject protectionism [which would complete the process of destroying our One World model], to underpin prosperity [unspoken: by which we really mean ‘to put our globalist model back together again]; and:

• Build an inclusive [globalist cliché], green [globalist cliché implying the unproven ideology of global warming] and sustainable recovery [globalist cliché: the standard overuse of the weasel word ‘sustainable’ implies that ‘if we don’t do what we are ordering the ‘planet’ to do, humanity will perish – a lie based upon the fallacy that the earth’s resources are finite, which is not true. At the time of Christ, there would have been perhaps 50-100 million people on earth. There are now 6.5 billion; and we are all breathing].

CRUCIAL FISCAL UNDERTAKINGS IN PARAGRAPH SIX
The Communiqué is full of this familiar globalist language, embracing ideologically ‘uncontestable’ presumptions which mask crude propaganda that is not to be challenged by simple people like us.

However Paragraph 6 contained actual SUBSTANCE, even though its CONTENT was masked in G-20-‘speak’ – the OPERATIVE keyword here being FISCAL:

‘6. We are undertaking a concerted fiscal expansion, which will save or create millions of jobs which would otherwise have been destroyed, and that will, by the end of next year, amount to $5 trillion, raise output by 4 per cent, and accelerate the transition to a green economy. We are committed to deliver the scale of sustained fiscal effort necessary to restore growth’.

But if we just take the British situation, there is no scope for ‘fiscal stimulus’ (reducing taxes) at all: in fact, in deference to German policy which is being served by the behaviour of the Governor of the Bank of England, who presided over the mismanagement of a (deliberately?) failed gilt issue the other day, the Chancellor of the Exchequer has actually been talking about RAISING TAXES, i.e. producing a deflationary budget later this month WHICH WILL MAKE THE SITUATION VERY MUCH WORSE. This is EXACTLY in line with covert DVD strategy to decapitate the British economy.

• FACT: In line with their slogan ‘For us the war never ended’, German (Nazi) strategists consider all economic policy to represent a pretext for economic warfare.

So what does Paragraph 6 mean by FISCAL?

The G-7-Approved private sector Refunding Programme of transparent trades yielding TAXABLE REVENUE to reliquefy the banks ON THE BOOKS, is the ONLY means whereby FISCAL STIMULUS can be delivered in the prevailing circumstances.

• FACT: The $5.0 trillion mentioned in Paragraph 6 refers to the tax that will have been raised on the books from the proceeds of the private sector Refunding Programme by the end of 2010.

By contrast, ‘Geithnerism’ – the son of ‘Paulsonism’ – involving the reckless, open-ended creation of Treasury debt in the background, creates no revenue at all, since by definition the public sector generates debt whereas it is ONLY the private sector that can generate TAXABLE REVENUE.

Therefore, it is clear that Paragraph 6 refers to the intended transparent private sector Refunding Programme, which, as this service has repeatedly sought to explain, both in these reports and in our printed subscription services, provides the SOLUTION to the crisis.

Indeed, the crisis would never have reached ‘train wreck’ status if this solution had been applied as soon as it had been approved by the Group of Seven financial powers in 2007. Instead of which, the criminal Paulson-Bush Jr. Treasury chose, as the Obama Treasury has also done, the corrupt off-balance sheet method – in a display of wanton arrogance and stupidity that defies belief, since the owners of the brains in question have more than enough ‘smarts’ between them to have been able to discern the correct way forward.

But crude self-enrichment and financing The New Underworld Order remained the priority, with the disastrous consequences that we predicted on 2nd September 2006 and again in December that year, and in our ‘train wreck’ reports in the summer of 2007: a disgraceful and disgusting display of opinionated, reprobate US official misbehaviour that cannot be expunged from the record (even though the ‘mainstream’ media is doing its best here) given that International Currency Review is resident all over the world, as a witness to these deliberate, criminal abominations.

THE PRIVATE MEETING BETWEEN THE QUEEN AND PRESIDENT OBAMA
Which brings us to what may have been said during the prolonged private meeting between the Queen and President Obama on 1st April 2009. After hastily trying to expunge the insults heaped upon the British during Mr Brown’s earlier visit to Washington, as we have described, President Obama’s minders stood on their heads and started promulgating the opposite message, namely that the ‘Special Relationship’ (so comprehensively mangled by criminalised American Administrations) is greatly to be valued, while our head of State is a jewel without compare (true).

Even so, President Obama arrived under a cloud, as implied by our ‘interview’ between The Queen and the President (see reports from 26th to 31st March 2009 – this text being so close to the reality that certain forces had it ‘snipped’ from our original report).

Now self-evidently, there would have been no flies on any wall inside Buckingham Palace. But even if a microphone had been installed within a picture frame above the Royal mantlepiece, no part of this supremely important private conversation could possibly, under any circumstances, have been leaked, and certainly not to the Editor of this service. That said, close observation left no doubt at all that The Queen deployed her unparalleled skills developed over 57 years of loyal service to place the young President at his ease, and then to persuade him that cooperation rather than confrontation would reap magnificent benefits for both parties, and for the whole world.

Since on-the-books private sector refunding using transparent, fully taxed trading operations yielding TAXABLE REVENUE in spades is the ONLY solution to the shambles created by the Bush-Paulson-Cheney criminal Administration, and exacerbated by the decisions taken under Geithner, and since transparent refunding will finance President Obama’s entire ambitious programme, with money to spare, it would appear that the Queen did not need to over-emphasise what the very intelligent President Barack Obama could certainly now see immediately for himself.

The unanswered question is whether his advisers, all of whom are linked to the Clinton Criminal Compartment of the CIA, had obfuscated this obvious solution or withheld any review of it from his attention – begging the further unanswered question as to whether President Obama was himself complicit in ignoring the G-7-Approved private sector Refunding Programme, or not.

But, as explained in the final brief update to our report dated 31st March, this is now, if the above assessment is correct, ‘water under the bridge’. What matters is that The Queen has diplomatically charmed and ‘turned’ President Obama in the interests of BOTH parties, and ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’. In the event that the Refunding Programme is sabotaged, then we would join those who proclaim that we are all doomed: but the indications are that it is to proceed.

SUDDEN CHANGE OF LANGUAGE AT THE FED
Open domain indications that A GENUINE DISCONTINUITY occurred as a specific consequence of the successful meeting between The Queen and President Obama are oblique, but telling. We can start with smoke signals from the Federal Reserve which – significantly – began almost immediately after the G-20 theatrical display, and which represented a precise REVERSAL of what the Federal Reserve had been saying PRIOR to that date. To wit:

• Bloomberg, 3rd April 2009: ‘Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said the central bank must retain the flexibility to withdraw its record injection of credit into the economy to keep inflation in check when the crisis abates’.

‘The central bank’s emergency ‘activities must not constrain the exercise of monetary policy as needed to meet our Congressional mandate to foster maximum sustainable employment and stable prices’, Bernanke said in a speech in Charlotte, North Carolina’.

‘The US central bank has effectively printed money to buy or lend against a range of assets [sic – Ed.] to alleviate the credit crunch and revive the economy. Bernanke’s speech today detailed steps that the Fed can take to remove that liquidity’.

• Bloomberg, 4th April: ‘The Federal Reserve’s two top officials assured that they will pull back their emergency credit programs once the crisis fades, even as they prepare to flood the system further with in excess of $1.0 trillion’.

‘Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said yesterday in Charlotte, North Carolina, that the Fed must retain the flexibility to withdraw its record cash injections to restrain prices. Vice Chairman Donald Kohn said in Wooster, Ohio, ‘the trick will be unwinding this balance sheet in a timely way to avoid inflation’.

‘We can’t go into this without knowing how we are going to get out again’, Kohn, 66, who’s worked for the Fed almost four decades, said in response to a question after a speech at the College of Wooster, where he received a bachelor’s degree in economics’.

FED PUSH FOR EXEMPTION FROM STATUTORY DEBT CEILING
In the course of his comments in Ohio, Kohn also lifted the lid on ANOTHER debt-building operation which may be in the pipeline, thereby reconfirming what a dreadful mess the Federal Reserve and the Treasury find themselves in as a consequence of their participation in and accommodation of this Fraudulent Finance orgy that came to a juddering halt in September 2008.

According to Bloomberg:

‘Kohn said the Fed and Treasury are seeking ‘other tools’ from Congress to help mop up excess cash. One possibility is that the Fed issue its own securities, or ‘Fed bills’, or the Treasury could issue special bills, and put the cash on deposit at the Fed’.

‘“It is important to get either of those tools EXEMPT FROM THE DEBT CEILING so that the Fed could have the power to absorb all the reserves it wanted to”, Kohn said’.

This, of course, would destroy the residual purpose of the Statutory Debt Ceiling, which is all that remains of Congress’s power to curb excessive borrowing by the Government.

In other words, to get out of its ghastly bind, the Federal Reserve is now pushing for a breach in the Statutory Debt Ceiling, which the Congress traditionally guards like a hawk – since if it were to be discarded or eroded, the Legislative Branch would be unable to exercise any constraint at all on the permissive borrowing of the Executive Branch.

FED NOW LESS CONCERNED ABOUT DEBT BECAUSE OF REFUNDING?
Now we have a choice here: we can speculate that this represents just the latest in a long line of demands by the Federal Reserve for the Legislature to furnish it with ‘whatever is necessary’ to enable it to overcome the calamity brought about by the fact that its previous Chairman, Dr Alan Greenspan, was DVD chieftain George H. W. Bush’s chief trader while also serving as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board; or we can speculate that, post-2nd April 2009, the Federal Reserve may be less concerned (assuming it ever was) about the Treasury’s colossal trash debt burden, given that it has had to recognise that the transparent private sector Refunding Programme generating windfall TAXABLE REVENUE is to go ahead from London, following the private meeting between The Queen and President Obama, so that there is nothing the Fed can do about it.

It is difficult to imagine how the Federal Reserve could possibly contemplate a full-frontal attack on Congress’s sacred Statutory Debt Limit if this were not the case.

As background, it is also a fact that private commentators are starting to deploy language that we have used for a long time in our reports. For instance, the US commentator Sean Brodrick stated on 1st April 2009 that bankers are financial terrorists and should be indicted. Thank you very much. Some of them may now be shot on sight: see above.

THE POST-G-20 CIA ‘COLLAPSING’ OPERATION
Beyond that, the following incredible state of affairs became apparent AFTER the conclusion of the overhyped G-20 theatrical display. What follows will stagger many people, no doubt.

Since we were double-crossed (see relevant reports dated 3rd and 18th March 2008), against the background of the de facto stealing of the Editor’s $35,000 private loan repayable with interest after two years on 11th June 2007, the Editor naturally severed relations with Mr Wanta. However on 24th March 2009, we received a copy of an email despatched by Wanta and addressed to an extended (revealed) list of media types, and to Attorney General Eric Holder, Lawrence Summers, Mr Paul A. Volcker, the Inspector General of the Federal Reserve, First Lady Michelle Obama, Valerie Jarrett, New York State Governor David A Patterson, Vice President Joseph Biden, US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, US Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, GAOFRAUDNET, the Joint Committee on Foreign Affairs, US Securities and Exchange Commission Enforcement Investigations, US Army Inspector General Green, US President Barack H. Obama and others, reading as follows:

Date: Tuesday, March 24, 2009, 11:51 am:
On advice of legal counsel, we will immediately seek treble damages from the US Department of the Treasury, et al, for lawless conversion of US Dollars 4.5 trillion plus daily interest accruals, and for denying me the lawful opportunity to pay my civil/repatriation income tax payment of US Dollars 1.575 trillion directly to our US Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Washington DC, USA, among other continuing incidents to be documented with extensive exhibits/documentation’.

President Obama… Thank you for trying, but it appears that our mutual attempt to cooperate and readily assist in the economic difficult times have fallen on deaf ears.

Thank you for your kind assistance.

Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta to the United Nations/USA/PRC/Republic of Singapore/State of Israel, Jerusalem.

Principality Central Bank Chairman.

Principality Trade Commissioner.

IT IS TIME………………“Never Let the Magic Dim”.

• Note: The ‘principality’ in question is a ‘micro-state’ in the Sydney, Australia, area calling itself The Principality of Snake Hill. The establishment of actual or ‘virtual’ micro-states (some of which are supposedly recognised by the United Nations) is a cynical operation of the globalist One World manipulators designed to hasten the fragmentation of the integrity of nation states. For instance, such a ‘micro-state’ exists inside the Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) complex outside Moscow.

We make no further comment on the above, and proceed now to two further comparably extraordinary developments.

On 3rd April, THE VERY DAY AFTER THE G-20 MEETING, Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., received a telephone call from the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Taxation asking him for filing and tax documentation in respect of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., Wanta’s corporation.

However it may be recalled that on 23rd March 2008, Wanta fired Michael Cottrell from his positions as Treasurer and Executive Vice President of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., by issuing and promulgating a three-page document called ‘Resolution of the Sole Shareholder’, whereas of course corporate resolutions are universally required to be Resolutions of the Board of Directors.

Equipped with this document, Mr Cottrell obtained the necessary forms from the Commonwealth of Virginia authorities and proceeded, with relief and at once, to file the necessary formal notices of his (irregular) ‘dismissal’ and his RESIGNATION dated 23rd March 2008 [see above] with the State tax authorities in Richmond, Commonwealth of Virginia.

But natürlich, on 3rd April 2009 the Virginia State authorities claimed, didn’t they, that they had no knowledge of that filing. Within half an hour, Michael Cottrell was of course able to fax copies of the documents that were filed with Virginia on 31st March 2008. Those papers necessarily stated that since Mr Cottrell was no longer Executive Vice President and Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., as of 23rd March 2008, all future enquiries and communications should be addressed to Mr Wanta at an address in the State of Wisconsin.

Again, bear in mind that this sudden interest on the part of the Virginia tax authorities surfaced IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE CLOSURE OF THE G-20 MEETING IN THE LONDON AREA.

Thirdly, we were informed, AGAIN on 3rd April 2009, by a knowledgeable US official source, that the State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue is to commence legal proceedings or has commenced legal proceedings to sue Bank of America, Richmond, for $4.5 trillion! See our Wantagate Petition for a Writ of Mandamus reports from June 2007 onwards, for background.

Now you may recall from our report dated 6th August 2007 that we have long since proved, with the assistance of documents (reproduced in International Currency Review) that the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue engaged in criminal conduct in charging Wanta THREE TIMES for State tax amounting to $14,129.00, which was paid twice, in May and then in June 1992, and a third time on 21st July 2005 using the Editor’s private LOAN funds. We also identified other respects in which criminal conduct by that Department was demonstrated.

The Editor attempted to assist Mr Wanta by asking the Wisconsin Court whether it would issue, following the ending of his probation as a consequence of the Editor’s payment effective 14th November 2005, the appropriate document recognising the restitution, but made no progress. Finally, on 17th October 2007, the Editor terminated this assistance by writing a Misprision of Felony letter to the relevant Judge in Wisconsin, drawing the Judge’s attention yet again to the matters displayed in our report dated 6th August 2007. All this information has been in the public domain in our financial journal and on this website for a very prolonged period of time.

We can comment no further on the specifics identified above. But what we CAN do, is draw your attention, finally, to the following considerations:

• As indicated, the telephone call from the Commonwealth of Virginia tax authorities and news of the Wisconsin Department of Revenue’s reported lawsuit against Bank of America BOTH occurred on 3rd April 2009, one day after the G-20 meeting.

• This clearly tends to support our assessment that A DECISIVE DISCONTINUITY amounting to ‘a resolution’ of key issues coincided with the G-20 event, arising from the meeting between The Queen and President Obama – ‘necessitating’ a CIA-contrived ‘collapsing’ operation (see below), (leaving aside the separate fact that Chancellor Merkel is reported, post-G-20, to be sabotaging the releases, as discussed above).

It could possibly be argued that the timing of the telephone call and the lawsuit information were both consequent specifically upon the issuance of Wanta’s notice of RICO action against the US Treasury; but in the overall G-20 context, that seems unlikely.

• The suing and cross-suing identified above represents a classic CIA IMPLOSION OPERATION, the overall purpose of which may well be to BURY this matter in a ‘Black’ avalanche of deliberately contrived confusion. It is associated with a parallel escalation of provocatively convoluted website confusion designed to intensify the impenetrable fog of disinformation, diversion, redirection and deception, with everyone portrayed to be fighting everyone else, and all at each other’s throats (a well-known cynical intelligence community obfuscation technique).

The intention of the lawsuits may be to ‘disappear’ the funds that have long since been stolen or diverted in a fog of cross-litigation lasting for years, with the prospect that cases will be dismissed and the entire matter wound up by process of exhaustion. Was this pre-planned? Of course it was.

• And was the advice given to Wanta to embark upon a RICO action ‘poisonous’ advice from a CIA lawyer? You decide.

The $6.2 trillion, of course, is not connected in any way with the foregoing, and was withdrawn as previously reported by this service, on 29th January 2009.

Notes:

(1) The verb ‘to thaumatrope’: to bombard captive audiences with endless verbiage without regard for those forced to put up with this offensive, such that the thaumatroper is engaged in a verbal assault from which the audience cannot escape.

(2) Base allegations that the Editor is ‘anti-French’ or ‘anti-German’ represent the concoctions of diminished minds. The Editor has visited France all his life, speaks French and has close friends in France. He studied singing in Vienna and travelled extensively in Germany in younger days, and listens non-stop to German classical music. We are addressing the evils of Governments and of the globalist usurpers, not of the abused peoples they are supposed to be serving.

(3) See the Editor’s book The New Underworld Order, Chapter Ten: ‘The Thousand-Year Reich’, available from the Edward Harle Limited (intelligence books) section of this combined website.

(4) During dinner in a Tarrytown, NY, restaurant the other day, the Editor’s guest asked what proportion of the perpetrators of these financial crimes are of Jewish extraction, to which the Editor responded: ‘100%’ (not quite true, as Stanford isn’t Jewish: but he’s an exception).

A few days later, an American Jewish contact in London made the unsolicited pertinent point to the Editor that ordinary people of Jewish extraction are getting extremely concerned at what has been happening because, as he put it, ‘they don’t want to be the scapegoats again’. This point was also raised several years ago by a Jewish leader in New York, who warned that if the Jewish community did not take care, there might be a ‘repeat performance’: and this was long before most people had heard of Bernard L. Madoff. The Education Director of a US School and Synagogue who is a friend of the Editor was asked some years ago (by the Editor) what his community’s attitude was towards these Jewish criminals who give the community such a bad name. He responded: ‘These people are a grave and continuing worry to our community. It is a very serious problem’.

These observations should ‘pacify’ anyone of diminished mental capacity who may deduce that our use of the taboo word ‘Jewish’ has any implications whatsoever beyond stating facts as they are, rather than in conformity with mind-controlled ‘political correctness’. Finally, the Editor’s Jewish friends on both sides of the Atlantic openly share this assessment.

(5) The full text of the Group of Twenty Communiqué issued from the London Summit on 2nd April 2009, is appended here for the record:

1. We, the Leaders of the Group of Twenty, met in London on 2 April 2009.

2. We face the greatest challenge to the world economy in modern times; a crisis which has deepened since we last met, which affects the lives of women, men, and children in every country, and which all countries must join together to resolve. A global crisis requires a global solution.

3. We start from the belief that prosperity is indivisible; that growth, to be sustained, has to be shared; and that our global plan for recovery must have at its heart the needs and jobs of hard-working families, not just in developed countries but in emerging markets and the poorest countries of the world too; and must reflect the interests, not just of today’s population, but of future generations too. We believe that the only sure foundation for sustainable globalisation and rising prosperity for all is an open world economy based on market principles, effective regulation, and strong global institutions.

4. We have today therefore pledged to do whatever is necessary to:
• Restore confidence, growth, and jobs;
• Repair the financial system to restore lending;
• Strengthen financial regulation to rebuild trust;
• Fund and reform our international financial institutions to overcome this crisis and prevent future ones;
• Promote global trade and investment and reject protectionism, to underpin prosperity; and
• Build an inclusive, green, and sustainable recovery.

By acting together to fulfil these pledges we will bring the world economy out of recession and prevent a crisis like this from recurring in the future.

5. The agreements we have reached today, to treble resources available to the IMF to $750 billion, to support a new SDR allocation of $250 billion, to support at least $100 billion of additional lending by the MDBs, to ensure $250 billion worth of support for trade finance, and to use the additional resources from agreed International Monetary Fund gold sales for concessional finance for the poorest countries, constitute an additional $1.1 trillion programme of support to restore credit, growth and jobs in the world economy. Together with the measures we have each taken nationally, this constitutes a global plan for recovery on an unprecedented scale.

Restoring growth and jobs:

6. We are undertaking an unprecedented and concerted fiscal expansion, which will save or create millions of jobs which would otherwise have been destroyed, and that will, by the end of next year, amount to $5 trillion, raise output by 4 per cent, and accelerate the transition to a green economy. We are committed to deliver the scale of sustained fiscal effort necessary to restore growth.

7. Our central banks have also taken exceptional action. Interest rates have been cut aggressively in most countries, and our central banks have pledged to maintain expansionary policies for as long as needed and to use the full range of monetary policy instruments, including unconventional instruments, consistent with price stability.

8. Our actions to restore growth cannot be effective until we restore domestic lending and international capital flows. We have provided significant and comprehensive support to our banking systems to provide liquidity, recapitalise financial institutions, and address decisively the problem of impaired assets. We are committed to take all necessary actions to restore the normal flow of credit through the financial system and ensure the soundness of systemically important institutions, implementing our policies in line with the agreed G-20 framework for restoring lending and repairing the financial sector.

9. Taken together, these actions will constitute the largest fiscal and monetary stimulus and the most comprehensive support programme for the financial sector in modern times. Acting together strengthens the impact and the exceptional policy actions announced so far must be implemented without delay. Today, we have further agreed over $1 trillion of additional resources for the world economy through our international financial institutions and trade finance.

10. Last month the IMF estimated that world growth in real terms would resume and rise to over two percent by the end of 2010. We are confident that the actions we have agreed today, and our unshakeable commitment to work together to restore growth and jobs, while preserving long-term fiscal sustainability, will accelerate the return to trend growth. We commit today to taking whatever action is necessary to secure that outcome, and we call on the IMF to assess regularly the actions taken and the global actions required.

11. We are resolved to ensure long-term fiscal sustainability and price stability and will put in place credible exit strategies from the measures that need to be taken now so as to support the financial sector and restore global demand. We are convinced that by implementing our agreed policies we will limit the longer-term costs to our economies, thereby reducing the scale of the fiscal consolidation necessary over the longer term.

12. We will conduct all our economic policies cooperatively and responsibly with regard to the impact on other countries and will refrain from competitive devaluation of our currencies and promote a stable and well-functioning international monetary system. We will support, now and in the future, to candid, even-handed, and independent IMF surveillance of our economies and financial sectors, of the impact of our policies on others, and of risks facing the global economy.

Strengthening financial supervision and regulation:

13. Major failures in the financial sector and in financial regulation and supervision were fundamental causes of the crisis. Confidence will not be restored until we rebuild trust in our financial system. We will take action to build a stronger, more globally consistent, supervisory and regulatory framework for the future financial sector, which will support sustainable global growth and serve the needs of business and citizens.

14. We each agree to ensure our domestic regulatory systems are strong. But we also agree to establish the much greater consistency and systematic cooperation between countries, and the framework of internationally agreed high standards, that a global financial system requires.

Strengthened regulation and supervision must promote propriety, integrity and transparency; guard against risk across the financial system; must dampen rather than amplify the financial and economic cycle; reduce reliance on inappropriately risky sources of financing; and discourage excessive risk-taking. Regulators and supervisors must protect consumers and investors, support market discipline, avoid adverse impacts on other countries, reduce the scope for regulatory arbitrage, support competition and dynamism, and keep pace with innovation in the marketplace.

15. To this end we are implementing the Action Plan agreed at our last meeting, as set out in the attached progress report. We have today also issued a Declaration, Strengthening the Financial System. In particular we agree:

• To establish a new Financial Stability Board (FSB) with a strengthened mandate, as a successor to the Financial Stability Forum (FSF), including all G-20 countries, FSF members, Spain, and the European Commission;

• That the FSB should collaborate with the IMF to provide early warning of macroeconomic and financial risks and the actions needed to address them;

• To reshape our regulatory systems so that our authorities are able to identify and take account of macro-prudential risks;

• To extend regulation and oversight to all systemically important financial institutions, instruments and markets. This will include, for the first time, systemically important hedge funds;

• To endorse and implement the FSF’s tough new principles on pay and compensation and to support sustainable compensation schemes and the corporate social responsibility of all firms;

• To take action, once recovery is assured, to improve the quality, quantity, and international consistency of capital in the banking system. In future, regulation must prevent excessive leverage and require buffers of resources to be built up in good times;

• To take action against non-cooperative jurisdictions, including tax havens. We stand ready to deploy sanctions to protect our public finances and financial systems. The era of banking secrecy is over. We note that the OECD has today published a list of countries assessed by the Global Forum against the international standard for exchange of tax information;

• To call on the accounting standard setters to work urgently with supervisors and regulators to improve standards on valuation and provisioning and achieve a single set of high-quality global accounting standards; and:

• To extend regulatory oversight and registration to Credit Rating Agencies to ensure they meet the international code of good practice, particularly to prevent unacceptable conflicts of interest.

16. We instruct our Finance Ministers to complete the implementation of these decisions in line with the timetable set out in the Action Plan. We have requested the FSB and the IMF to monitor progress, working with the Financial Action Taskforce and other relevant bodies, and to provide a report to the next meeting of our Finance Ministers in Scotland in November.

Strengthening our global financial institutions :

17. Emerging markets and developing countries, which have been the engine of recent world growth, are also now facing challenges which are adding to the current downturn in the global economy. It is imperative for global confidence and economic recovery that capital continues to flow to them. This will require a substantial strengthening of the international financial institutions, particularly the IMF. We have therefore agreed today to make available an additional $850 billion of resources through the global financial institutions to support growth in emerging market and developing countries by helping to finance counter-cyclical spending, bank recapitalisation, infrastructure, trade finance, balance of payments support, debt rollover, and social support.

To this end:

• We have agreed to increase the resources available to the IMF through immediate financing from members of $250 billion, subsequently incorporated into an expanded and more flexible New Arrangements to Borrow, increased by up to $500 billion, and to consider market borrowing if necessary; and:

• We support a substantial increase in lending of at least 100 billion dollars by the Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs), including to low income countries, and [will] ensure that all MDBs have the appropriate capital [Text unclear here].

18. It is essential that these resources can be used effectively and flexibly to support growth. We welcome in this respect the progress made by the IMF with its new Flexible Credit Line (FCL) and its reformed lending and conditionality framework which will enable the IMF to ensure that its facilities address effectively the underlying causes of countries’ balance of payments financing needs, particularly the withdrawal of external capital flows to the banking and corporate sectors.

We support Mexico’s decision to seek an FCL arrangement.

19. We have agreed to support a general SDR allocation which will inject $250 billion into the world economy and increase global liquidity, and urgent ratification of the Fourth Amendment.

20. In order for our financial institutions to help manage the crisis and prevent future crises we must strengthen their longer term relevance, effectiveness and legitimacy. So alongside the significant increase in resources agreed today we are determined to reform and modernise the international financial institutions to ensure they can assist members and shareholders effectively in the new challenges they face. We will reform their mandates, scope and governance to reflect changes in the world economy and the new challenges of globalisation, and that emerging and developing economies, including the poorest, must have greater voice and representation. This must be accompanied by action to increase the credibility and accountability of the institutions through better strategic oversight and decision making.

To this end:

• We commit to implementing the package of IMF quota and voice reforms agreed in April 2008 and call on the IMF to complete the next review of quotas by January 2011;

• We agree that, alongside this, consideration should be given to greater involvement of the Fund’s Governors in providing strategic direction to the IMF and increasing its accountability;

• We commit to implementing the World Bank reforms agreed in October 2008. We further look forward to further recommendations, at the next meetings, on voice and representation reforms on an accelerated timescale, to be agreed by the 2010 Spring Meetings;

• We agree that the heads and senior leadership of the international financial institutions should be appointed through an open, transparent, and merit-based selection process; and:

• Building on the current reviews of the IMF and World Bank we asked the Chairman, working with the G-20 Finance Ministers, to consult widely in an inclusive process and report back to the next meeting with proposals for further reforms to improve responsiveness and adaptability of the IFIs.

21. In addition to reforming our international financial institutions for the new challenges of globalisation we agreed on the desirability of a new global consensus on the key values and principles that will promote sustainable economic activity. We support discussion on such a charter for sustainable economic activity with a view to further discussion at our next meeting.

We take note of the work started in other fora in this regard and look forward to further discussion of this charter for sustainable economic activity.

Resisting protectionism and promoting global trade and investment:

22. World trade growth has underpinned rising prosperity for half a century. But it is now falling for the first time in 25 years. Falling demand is exacerbated by growing protectionist pressures and a withdrawal of trade credit. Reinvigorating world trade and investment is essential for restoring global growth. We will not repeat the historic mistakes of protectionism of previous eras.

To this end:

• We reaffirm the commitment made in Washington: to refrain from raising new barriers to investment or to trade in goods and services, imposing new export restrictions, or implementing World Trade Organisation (WTO) inconsistent measures to stimulate exports. In addition we will rectify promptly any such measures. We extend this pledge to the end of 2010;

• We will minimise any negative impact on trade and investment of our domestic policy actions including fiscal policy and action in support of the financial sector. We will not retreat into financial protectionism, particularly measures that constrain worldwide capital flows, especially to developing countries;

• We will notify promptly the WTO of any such measures and we call on the WTO, together with other international bodies, within their respective mandates, to monitor and report publicly on our adherence to these undertakings on a quarterly basis;

• We will take, at the same time, whatever steps we can to promote and facilitate trade and investment; and:

• We will ensure availability of at least $250 billion over the next two years to support trade finance through our export credit and investment agencies and through the MDBs.

We ask our regulators to make use of available flexibility in capital requirements for trade finance.

23. We remain committed to reaching an ambitious and balanced conclusion to the Doha Development Round, which is urgently needed. This could boost the global economy by at least $150 billion per annum. To achieve this we are committed to building on the progress already made, including with regard to modalities.

24. We will give renewed focus and political attention to this critical issue in the coming period and will use our continuing work and all international meetings that are relevant to drive progress.

Ensuring a fair and sustainable recovery for all:

25. We are determined not only to restore economic growth but to lay the foundation for a fair and sustainable world economy. We recognise that the current crisis has a disproportionate impact on the vulnerable in the poorest countries and recognise our collective responsibility to mitigate the social impact of the crisis to minimise long-lasting damage to global potential.

To this end:

• We reaffirm our historic commitment to meeting the Millennium Development Goals and to achieving our respective ODA pledges, including commitments on Aid for Trade, debt relief, and the Gleneagles commitments, especially to sub-Saharan Africa;

• The actions and decisions we have taken today will provide $50 billion to support social protection, boost trade and safeguard development in low income countries, as part of the significant increase in crisis support for these and other developing countries/ emerging markets;

• We are making available resources for social protection for the poorest countries, including through investing in long-term food security and through voluntary bilateral contributions to the World Bank’s Vulnerability Framework, including the Infrastructure Crisis Facility, and the Rapid Social Response Fund;

• We have committed, consistently with the new income model, that additional resources from agreed sales of IMF gold will be used, together with surplus income, to provide $6 billion additional concessional and flexible finance for the poorest countries over the next 2 to 3 years. We call on the IMF to come forward with concrete proposals at the Spring Meetings;

• We have agreed to review the flexibility of the Debt Sustainability Framework and call on the IMF and World Bank to report to the IMFC and Development Committee at the Annual Meetings; and

• We call on the UN, working with other global institutions, to establish an effective mechanism to monitor the impact of the crisis on the poorest and most vulnerable.

26. We recognise the human dimension to the crisis. We commit to support those affected by the crisis by creating employment opportunities and through income support measures. We will build a fair and family-friendly labour market for both women and men.

We therefore welcome the reports of the London Jobs Conference and the Rome Social Summit and the key principles they proposed. We will support employment by stimulating growth, investing in education and training, and through active labour market policies, focusing on those who are most vulnerable. We call upon the ILO, working with other relevant organisations, to assess the actions taken and those required for the future.

27. We agreed to make the best possible use of investment funded by fiscal stimulus programmes towards the goal of building a resilient, sustainable, and green recovery.

We will make the transition towards clean, innovative, resource efficient, low carbon technologies and infrastructure. We encourage the MDBs to contribute fully to the achievement of this stated objective. We will identify and work together on further measures to build sustainable economies.

28. We reaffirm our commitment to address the threat of irreversible climate change, based on the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities, and to reach agreement at the UN Climate Change conference in Copenhagen in December 2009.

Delivering our commitments:

29. We have committed ourselves to work together with urgency and determination to translate these words into action. We agreed to meet again before the end of this year to review progress on our commitments (6).

(6) Tax Information Exchange Agreements (TIEAS) are based on a model OECD agreement on the exchange of information on tax matters, developed by the OECD Global Forum Working Group on Effective Exchange of Information. The purpose of this Agreement is to promote international co-operation in tax matters through the exchange of information. It was developed by the OECD’s Global Forum Working Group on Effective Exchange of Information (“the Working Group”). The Working Group consisted of representatives from OECD Member countries as well as delegates from Aruba, Bermuda, Bahrain, Cayman Islands, Cyprus, The Isle of Man, Malta, Mauritius, the Netherlands Antilles, the Seychelles and San Marino (the Italian mafia’s de facto jurisdiction).
The Agreement grew out of the work undertaken by the OECD to address harmful tax practices.

The lack of effective exchange of information is one of the primary criteria used in determining harmful tax practices. The mandate of the Working Group was to develop a legal instrument that could be used to establish effective exchange of information. The Agreement represents the standard of effective exchange of information for the purposes of the OECD’s initiative on harmful tax practices. This Agreement text, which was released by the OECD in April 2002, is not a binding instrument but contains two models for bilateral agreements. A number of bilateral agreements have been based on this Agreement.

Recent bilateral Tax Information Exchange Agreements (TIEAS) monitored by this service include:

• Antigua & Barbuda – Australia, 30 January 2007
• Antigua & Barbuda – United States, 06 December 2000
• Antigua & Barbuda – Australia, 30 January 2007
• Antigua & Barbuda – United States, 06 December 2000
• Aruba – United States, 21 November 2003
• Australia – Bermuda, 15 November 2005
• Australia – British Virgin Islands, 27 October 2008
• Australia – Isle of Man, 29 January 2009
• Australia – Netherlands Antilles, 01 March 2007
• Bahamas – United States, 25 January 2002
• Bermuda – United Kingdom, 4 December 2007
• British Virgin Islands – United States, 03 April 2002
• Cayman Islands – United States, 27 November 2001
• Denmark – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Denmark – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Denmark – Isle of Man, 30 October 2007
• Denmark – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• Faroes – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Faroes – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Faroes – Isle of Man, 30 October 2007
• Faroes – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• Finland – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Finland – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Finland – Isle of Man, 30 October 2007
• Finland – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• France – Guernsey, 24 March 2009
• France – Isle of Man, 26 March 2009
• France – Jersey, 23 March 2009
• Germany – Guernsey, 26 March 2009
• Germany – Isle of Man, 02 March 2009
• Greenland – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Greenland – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Greenland – Isle of Man, 30 October 2007
• Greenland – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• Guernsey – Netherlands, 25 April 2008
• Iceland – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Iceland – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Iceland – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• Ireland – Guernsey, 26 March 2009
• Ireland – Jersey, 26 March 2009
• Isle of Man – Ireland, 24 April 2008
• Isle of Man – Netherlands, 12 October 2005
• Isle of Man – Norway, 30 October 2007
• Isle of Man – Sweden, 30 October 2007
• Isle of Man – United Kindom, 29 September 2008
• Isle of Man – United States, 02 October 2002
• Jersey – Germany, 4 July 2008
• Jersey – Netherlands, 20 June 2007
• Jersey – United States, 04 November 2002
• Netherlands Antilles – New Zealand, 01 March 2007
• Netherlands Antilles – Spain, 10 June 2008
• Netherlands Antilles – United States, 17 April 2002
• Norway – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Norway – Guernsey, 28 October 2008
• Norway – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• Sweden – Cayman Islands, 1 April 2009
• Sweden – Guernsy, 28 October 2008
• Sweden – Jersey, 28 October 2008
• United Kingdom – British Virgin Islands, 29 October 2008
• United Kingdom – Guernsey, 20 January 2009
• United Kingdom – Jersey, 10 March 2009
• United States – Liechtenstein, 8 December 2008
• United States – Gibraltar, 31 March 2009

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. Some versions have a ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

QUEEN’S $52 BILLION STOLEN UNDER OBAMA’S REGIME

WHITE HOUSE ATTEMPTS TO GET US TO BLAME PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION

Monday 9 March 2009 16:00

QUEEN’S FUNDS WITHDRAWN ON 29TH JANUARY 2009 AFTER OBAMA CAME TO OFFICE

SO THE $52 BILLION OF HMQ’S MONEY (‘GUARANTEES’) WERE STOLEN UNDER OBAMA

A SCANDAL THEY HOPED COULD BE DEFLECTED AWAY FROM THE NEW WHITE HOUSE

WHY THE VIBES BETWEEN OBAMA AND BROWN DURING BROWN’S DC VISIT WERE SO BAD

• VERY IMPORTANT UPDATES APPENDED AT 3:00AM 10TH MARCH 2009
ARE LOCATED AT THE FOOT OF THIS REPORT ABOVE THE LEGAL REMINDERS

•INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW, Volume 34, #2: This issue is now well advanced in our print works and will be distributed worldwide soon. As indicated previously and below, it contains three flowcharts which show how the fake ‘derivatives’ sector represents a gigantic BANKERS’ RAMP, how the Paulson TARP operation was designed to reliquefy the likes of Carlyle, Carlyle Capital, George Bush Sr. and other familiar perpetrators, and why ALL derivatives ‘products’ are frauds – equipped, even, with their own esoteric language, the purpose of which is to prevent ordinary mortals from understanding how these interrelated Ponzi Scheme operations function.

But it is historically true that ALL Ponzi schemes implode sooner of later. What makes the present situation unprecedented in the history of fallen humanity is that (a) what is happening was indeed predicted here long before anyone had ever heard of Roubini, and (b) all the Ponzi operations are interlinked. Hence reports of EIGHT more Ponzi collapses pending in Europe, the panic that is now evident everywhere as it has been realised that hardly any institutions managed to avoid being caught up in the corruption, and the chaotic responses of terrified governments and officials who have not understood the central issue: THE DERIVATIVES ARE FAKE AND HENCE WORTHLESS.

International Currency Review may be ordered direct via this website. To order the forthcoming issue alone, please enter a regular order and ALSO send us an email via the CONTACT US tab to state that you specifically require International Currency Review Volume 34, #2 only. We have to charge a premium for individual issues, as we sell only serials in the normal course of business.
On this occasion, we are charging $300 for this issue, incorporating a 50% DONATION mark-up.

All such orders, as with all donations made to assist us with the financing of this research and our necessary exposures, are appreciated and acknowledged by the Editor.

• MADOFF ‘VICTIMS’ LIST: Two reports were posted on 6th February 2009 containing the entire list of customers of Bernard L. Madoff Securities, Inc.. Because the list is so huge, we divided it into two segments: Clients A-N; and clients O-Z, plus a Miscellaneous Section. See: Archive. Our list is the easiest to load and clearest of the lists that have been reproduced privately on the Internet.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice is comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the brave contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

• The CONTACT US facility is found in the red box throughout this combined website.

• NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

QUEEN’S FUNDS WITHDRAWN ON 29TH JANUARY 2009 AFTER OBAMA CAME TO OFFICE
It will be recalled that we have reported that the $14.0 trillion of real cash-cash funds, the only ‘real’ and clean money in the system, had to be withdrawn from access by US authorities altogether and that the withdrawal of these funds occurred on 29th January 2009.

This fact, which we had already reported, was confirmed to the Editor of this service on 3rd March 2009 by a British intelligence source.

The $14.0 trillion had consisted of the $6.2 trillion made available by Her Majesty the Queen, with a proportion owned by Prince Al-Aweed Al-Talal of Saudi Arabia, via the Bank of England on 19th-20th June 2007, to Bank of New York Mellon for use as the basis for the Group of Seven (G-7)-approved Refunding Programme of transparent, fully taxed private sector Capital Markets trading operations to reliquefy the delinquent banks ON THE BOOKS, and that the $6.2 trillion cash represented LOAN funds which had nothing whatsoever to do with any other funds referenced in earlier reports.

It will also be recalled that we have reported that the $6.2 trillion languished for 19 months within the Custodial Account system under Paulson US Treasury control within US money center banks, and was not used for the purpose for which it was intended, but was corruptly redeployed instead to generate illicit funds for the corrupt banker’s ramp carousel and for the enrichment of holders of the highest offices in the United States and their corrupt attorneys, intermediaries and others.

In our posting dated 5th March 2009, we reported that prior to the $14.0 trillion (incorporating the $6.2 trillion) being repatriated, an amount of $50 billion of The Queen’s funds had allegedly been stolen. We included the word ‘allegedly’, although we KNEW that $52 billion HAD been STOLEN.

Moreover as reported, the $6.2 trillion plus the Chinese segments aggregating $7.8 trillion were removed from any possibility of being accessed by US parties on 29th January 2009, namely just over a week AFTER President Barack Obama entered the White House.

MANIFESTLY, if there had been a problem of theft PRIOR TO OBAMA COMING TO OFFICE, the funds would have been removed from access by the corrupt US authorities BEFORE Mr Barack Hussein Obama entered the White House, wouldn’t they?

• The British authorities concerned wouldn’t have wanted to cause the incoming Obama Administration embarassment by removing the funds after the Inauguration.

• Diplomacy, and all that.

• INSTEAD OF WHICH the funds were removed from access AFTER the Inauguration.

SO THE $52 BILLION OF HMQ’S MONEY (‘GUARANTEES’) WERE STOLEN UNDER OBAMA
From which it is A CERTAINTY that the $52 billion that were STOLEN from The Queen’s LOAN funds were sliced AFTER OBAMA ENTERED THE WHITE HOUSE, AND NOT BEFORE.

• FACT: Therefore, the theft occurred under President Obama and NOT under his predecessor.

Which must be a FACT that the White House would prefer that we hadn’t UNDERSTOOD.

• Next point:

On Friday 6th March 2009, between approximately 8:19 EST and 8:20 EST, Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., the US securities expert, received a telephone call from a Gold Badge who advised him that
a ‘clarification’ was ‘necessary’ regarding ‘the $50 billion of The Queen’s money allegedly stolen prior to repatriation’ (citing the Editor’s language used in the report dated 5th March 2009).

The ‘clarification’ that he wanted made (should the Editor so agree to it, at his sole discretion) was that this text should be amended to read:

‘$52 billion of guarantees by The Queen’ and that no cash was stolen.

HOWEVER, a signed guarantee is a signed guarantee, and one issued by a Head of State is better than CASH, don’t you know. So, what we have now found out is as follows:

• US authorities UNDER OBAMA ADMIT that value of $52 billion belonging to The Queen was STOLEN, thereby acknowledging the accuracy of our report to this effect dated 5th March 2009.

• Stealing guarantees means that The Queen’s guarantees, if they were stolen rather than actual cash, were stolen BECAUSE THEY WERE TO BE USED FOR PURPOSES OTHER THAN THOSE THAT WERE INTENDED BY THE GUARANTOR. This is A GROSS ACT OF ECONOMIC WARFARE.

NO WONDER THAT THE VIBES BETWEEN OBAMA AND BROWN DURING HIS RECENT VISIT TO WASHINGTON WERE SO BAD. NO WONDER COMPLICIT VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN LOOKED LIKE A SOUR JACKASS AS HE SAT WITH A SIMILAR BLANK EXPRESSION TO CHENEY BEHIND THE BRITISH PRIME MINISTER AS HE DELIVERED HIS PRAISE FOR THE VERY CROOKS WHO HAVE STOLEN FROM THE QUEEN AND ARE CONTINUING TO RAPE AND PILLAGE THEIR FELLOW AMERICANS AND THE REST OF THE WORLD UNDER BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA ‘AS WE SPEAK’.

• If it is the case that guarantees rather than cash were stolen, then we suggest that the publicity we have given and are giving to this matter must, by definition, render the illegal and corrupt use of those guarantees for duplicitous, illicit purposes UNDER THE B. OBAMA REGIME impossible now, since every Government and every bank in the world will be appraised of this latest instance of official corruption at the highest level of the US Government, under President Obama as under his predecessors, just as soon as this report has been posted.

• BUT IF the guarantees have already been deployed, those parties thereto will have become co-conspirators in this de facto Act of US Economic Warfare against the United Kingdom committed under the Obama Administration and should immediately UNWIND THE TRANSACTIONS and/or the relationships involved, or face the consequences.

THE EDITOR MAKES HIS OWN ‘CLARIFICATION’
Finally, the Editor would like to make the following further ‘clarification’:

• Pressure has been exerted from the White House on the Editor of this service to post certain information (in our possession), the overall effect of which would be to serve the Obama White House’s interest in focusing the entire blame for specific thefts and fraud, and generally for the ongoing, unresolved financial chaos, on the corrupt predecessor Administration, and away from the present US Government and White House.

• The Editor was not born yesterday, although yesterday was in fact his birthday.

• If it was all the Bush II Administration’s fault, why then was the US Dollar Refunding not at once implemented as agreed by the G-7 Financial powers in 2007 and 2008, why have the Settlements been sabotaged SO FAR, as under the despicable George Bush regime, and why was $52 BILLION OF THE QUEEN’S MONEY STOLEN, and why this nit-picking differentiation between $52 billion cash and $52 billion of guarantees by a Head of State?

• Is it seriously suggested that stealing $52 billion of guarantees by a HEAD OF STATE is a LESSER CRIME than stealing $52 billion in cash?

But thanks anyway to the Gold Badge for confirming the theft, which took place UNDER OBAMA AND NOT BEFORE HE ENTERED THE WHITE HOUSE.

• Thought you’d all appreciate this ‘clarification’.

• UPDATES APPENDED AT 3:OOAM UK TIME 1OTH MARCH 2009:

(1) We have been advised that the matter of the $52 billion of The Queen’s ‘guarantees’ has now been ‘rectified’ by or on the instructions of President Obama. This BEGS THE QUESTION of why they were ‘removed’ in the first place: AND WE KNOW THAT THEY WERE MISSING WHEN THE LOAN FUNDS WERE WITHDRAWN, as this information was provided inter alia by a Gold Badge source, and it has now been separately confirmed that the $52 billion of ‘guarantees’ were indeed ‘restored’. (Clearly if they have been ‘restored’, that is because they were previously missing).

• So, WHEN were the $52 billion ‘restored’, exactly?

AFTER the appearance of the present report, which rendered the ‘guarantees’ USELESS when corruptly applied for a purpose for which they were not intended, by any chance?

(2) We have not published certain other detailed information supplied to us, for the reason set out above, namely that it focuses attention on certain criminal acts under the Bush II regime, whereas the crisis the world faces is being experienced UNDER PRESIDENT OBAMA and Vice President Joe Biden, who have the power to resolve matters but have conspicuously failed, so far, to do so.

We are not satisfied that the information that certain forces want us to publish has been proffered for straightforward reasons, and until such time as this is clarified to our satisfaction, the Editor exercises his prerogative not to publish the information [see above].

(3) Nor is this White House enforcing the Rule of Law.

• For instance, the Clintons are reported to have been able to REMOVE all their ill-gotten money from Citibank. Excu…se us? Those funds were FROZEN when the Provost Marshal was replaced by a new Provost Marshal way back, remember?

• So we suspect that Clinton’s gopher, Robert Rubin, has procured the removal of the Clinton funds from Citibank and that he did this before he himself left the institution.

• If this is correct, then the new White House has allowed a disgracefully corrupt state of affairs to remain unaddressed, and THAT IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH AND IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH PLEAS THAT WE HEAR TO THE EFFECT THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA IS A ‘WHITE HAT’.

• On the evidence to date, his hat is getting rather dirty, and the dirt comes off the hands of the scumbags in his entourage.

(4) We are advised that the oft-braceleted Dr Alan ‘Greenspan was flung into jail yesterday, and that a sensitive meeting took place on Monday to ‘decide his fate’. One is tempted to ask why on earth it is necessary to hold a meeting to decide whether this crook has now committed enough crimes to warrant APPLICATION OF THE RULE OF LAW: or could it be that he holds so much dirt on those who are trying to decide what to do with him, that they are prepared to go on fiddling while the whole international financial system collapses, stupid fools, around their ears?

(5) After propaganda all weekend to the effect that the Settlements were on track for progress and implementation on 9th March, NOTHING HAPPENED, even though Citibank had been advised that if the payments were not effected as required on 9th March, Citibank will be subjected to a straight FDIC takeover (which was supposed to happen overnight: we’ll see).

(7) The Editor has detailed information on the Stanford dimension of the crisis, plus the open domain intelligence on Vice President Biden’s involvement, and this report takes precedence, although there is still some work left to do on it (on top of the Editor’s other publishing work).

• FACT: Stanford, from Houston, TX, took over where Noriega left off, as a primary Ponzi scheme operative working with/for the Bushes. DVD drug-running operative Carlos Lehder ‘testified’ in Noriega’s trial (although his testimony was a rant and was superfluous to requirements), and was the source of the $40 million procured by a Bush Sr. Attorney to pay off key political structures in 2000 when the election was being stolen, and to silence the law enforcement, plus the legal and penitentiary personnel, when Lehder, in exchange, was whisked from long-term incarceration and extradited to GERMANY. Naturlich. Our sources reported that the political structures in question recieved $32 million and the corrupted personnel $8 million, on that happy and lucrative occasion.

• SWINDLER’S LIST UPDATE: Sherman Oaks-based mortgage banker Bruce Friedman, whose
Friedman Charitable Foundation committed $10 million to the Children’s Museum of Los Angeles and $1 million to Brandon’s Village, a special-needs park in Calabasas, has been indicted on
securities fraud charges by the Securities and Exchange Commission [9th March 2009].

The SEC alleges that Friedman, along with his two companies, Diversified Lending Group (DLG) and Applied Equities, Inc. (AEI), perpetrated a $216 million real estate investment fraud scheme, raising money from investors nationwide, many of whom are seniors, promising guaranteed high returns via real estate investments. Another PONZI FRAUD bites the dust.

The SEC complaint alleges that Friedman diverted substantial investor money to ventures that were unrelated to real estate, and misappropriated at least $17 million to support his hyperlavish lifestyle, including purchases of a luxury home, cars, vacations, jewellery, and designer clothing for himself and a female of his acquaintance. The SEC has frozen DLG’s, AEI’s and Friedman’s assets.

OK, small fry compared with Madoff, Stanford, the Bushes, the Clintons, Dr Alan ‘god’ Greenspoon, and all the other notorious criminals that we have to report about. But shoals of ‘little fish’ like this sheister are cruising for the appropriate bruising, and it’ll continue like this for YEARS AND YEARS.

Mopping up the lesser sheisters makes US law enforcement, after years of neglect, both look good and feel good about itself: whereas, what is actually happening is that most Americans are asking with extreme impatience, now: WHY ARE THE GIGA-CROOKS WALKING, when they should all have been arrested and decapitated BEFORE THIS PREDICTED CRISIS RAN OUT OF CONTROL?

• The sordid answer which is being SUPPRESSED is this: ‘BECAUSE WE WANT TO BE PAID, TOO’.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.