WORST FINANCIAL TERRORISM SABOTAGE IN HISTORY

story2

U.S. CADRES TOO COWARDLY, WEAK AND FECKLESS TO ARREST BUSH SR. FOR FINANCIAL TERRORISM AND OPEN-ENDED WANTON MAFIOSO SABOTAGE

Saturday 10 July 2010 00:01

NEW INFORMATION:

BELOW:
CIA/MI6.OBAMA/BUSH SR./CHENEY ORDERED CHISTOPHER STORY’S ASSASSINATION
AND ARE SUPRISED AND TERRIFIED THAT HE IS NOT DEAD

OBAMA AND BUSH ‘SPOKEN TO’ BY MEN WITH GUNS

• When ‘President’ Barack Hussein Obama touched down on the White House Lawn at 5:30pm on 9th July, he was ‘spoken to’. Enquiries by this service confirm that those doing the ‘speaking’ were not Secret Service operatives. On the contrary they were men with guns.

• Within the past 24-30 hours, private citizen George Godfather H. W. Bush Sr. has likewise been ‘spoken to’ twice. The people doing the ‘speaking’ were men with guns.

• The Chinese have had enough and are ready to take drastic lethal measures.

• Private citizens George H. W. Bush Sr. and Neil Bush think they are immortal and can take the loot they are blocking to the grave.

• Obama, who answers to the private citizen George H. W. Bush Sr., is saying he’s a ‘national citizen’. In order to be President of the United States, under the Constitution and the Soldiers and Sailors Act, you have to be a NATURAL citizen born in the United States or born in a US military family serving abroad.

CIA/CHENEY/MI6/OBAMA/BUSH SR. HAVE ATTEMPTED
TO ASSASSINATE CHRISTOPHER STORY
A detailed report on this assassination attempt and the horrible illness inflicted on the Editor as a consequence will be published as soon as feasible.

•We now have proof that the CIA/MI6/Obama/Bush/Cheney issued an assassination order against this Editor. We have proof that they are suprised that the Editor is not dead.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• THE WHOLE WORLD AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL KNOWS IN DETAIL ABOUT THIS U.S. CORRUPTION AND CRIMINAL FINANCIAL TERRORISM CRISIS, NOT LEAST FROM THIS WEBSITE. THEY RIGHTLY REGARD THE UNITED STATES AS AN ARROGANT, RUTHLESS PARIAH STATE THAT IMAGINES IT CAN DO WHAT IT PLEASES AS IT DESTROYS ITSELF

• LIENHOLDERS HAVE SEIZED CONTROL OF BANK OF AMERICA, CHARLOTTE, NC., AND OF DEUTSCHE BANK, FRANKFURT AND HAVE CLEANED OUT THE SABOTEURS: SEE BELOW

• HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SIGNED THE NECESSARY PAYOUT DOCUMENTS, AS EXPECTED, DURING HER VISIT TO NEW YORK. SHE WAS DOUBLE-CROSSED BY BUSH SR.

• SEE KEY POINTS BELOW AND CONFIRMATION IN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW A. CLIFTON HODGES’ LETTER TO THE BRITISH CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER, GEORGE OSBORNE, DATED 8TH JULY 2010. THIS LETTER CONFIRMS ALL OF THE KEY POINTS OUTLINED BELOW.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports on the US/German/French official criminality underlying this crisis.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock.

• We sell books DIRECT ONLY. We also supply to bookstores.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• OUR U.S. LANDLINES ARE NOW PERMANENTLY CLOSED BECAUSE OF U.S. HARASSMENT.
WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL, UK FAX OR VIA THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• FOR LATEST INFORMATION ON OUR INTELLIGENCE PUBLICATIONS, SEE SECOND PANEL.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

EMAIL POLICY: All anonymous emails from parties who are too wet and scared to provide their full coordinates as required by our ‘Contact Us’ facility are trashed unread. All uncouth, New Age, rude, discourteous, blasphemous, satanic, goss, filthy and otherwise objectionable emails, including ignorant rants promoting ‘Black’ revisionist claptrap about e.g. the British Monarchy ‘owning’ America and other old Nazi ‘Black’ propaganda emanating from the CIA’s massive lie and disinformation apparat, are trashed. For many years this website has carried a statement at the foot of the reports stating in crystal clear English that we will NOT enter into correspondence concerning the current and earlier reports posted on this website.

• We use simple, plain English so that people can understand what we say.

• We correspond with known and trusted correspondents only. Stray questions about of the blue on matters connected with the Settlements are not answered.

As you can see from the above, we have closed down all our communications because of interminable and intolerable harassment from the United States. We have also added a large number of parties to our ‘Black List’ so that their incessant emails bounce.

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••*

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

• KEY POINTS:

• The Lienholders exercised a foreclosure and management takeover on Friday 2nd and Saturday 3rd July 2010 of Deutsche Bank, Frankfurt, Germany and of Bank of America, Charlotte, NC. They took this action due to ongoing sabotage by the US official keptocracy.

• They immediately removed people in both banks working for the saboteurs and opponents of the necessary resolutions and cleared derivatives (toxic debt) off the balance sheets.

• This took Deutsche Bank out of the control of Bush Sr.’s agent [see earlier reports: Archive], Chancellor Angela Merkel, and the saboteurs in Germany.

• Likewise they took the CIA’s compromised Bank of America out of the control of the corrupt bankers and CIA saboteurs in the United States.

• Her Majesty The Queen signed the necessary authorities for the Refunding Programme, the Loan Facility and other necessary papers during her visit to New York, as expected.

• As a result of the above the necessary funds were available for distribution
on Tuesday 6th July 2010.

• As usual, George Bush Sr. interfered, as a consequence of which the Chinese parties had a ‘talk’ with the corrupt, demonic Godfather Bush Sr.

• By 7th July (Wednesday) a full meeting of Compliance Officers had taken place and the parties were again said to be prepared to initiate the transfers.

• Whereupon the corrupt Leon Panetta, Director of Central Intelligence (CIA), pathetically following ‘instructions’ issued by a private citizen named George H. W. Bush and issued to his poodle in the White House, the gutless Barack Hussein Obama, issued instructions to banking authorities the ‘placate but do not pay’ (accounting for the immediate lies summarised below), thus ‘preventing’ the feckless and terrified banking authorities from making any transfers.

• Bush Sr.’s poodle, Barack Hussein Obama, is too weak and lacking in backbone to grasp that Bush Sr.’s threats [see below] are BLUFF. He lacks the spine to stand up to this crook and face him down, which is the only way to deal with these possessed ‘Black’ US Nazi operatives, as we have amply demonstrated on this website

• On 7th July, the Chinese authorities then had another talk’ with Bush Sr., as a consequence of which the payout procedures were put back in place on that date, to start up at 3:00pm EDT..

• Having thus lied as usual to the Chinese parties, private citizen Bush Sr. contacted Barack Hussein Obama and INSTRUCTED HIM not to allow the release of the funds.

• In that telephone call to the White House, Bush Sr. also threatened that if Obama authorised release of the funds, Bush Sr. would go to the Supreme Court and have Obama’s Presidency terminated’ [see earlier reports, notably the Biden comment on this score].

• As a consequence, the terrified and gutless Obama obeyed the private citizen George H. W. Bush and the agreed-upon payout of the Settlement funds has not taken place.

• Michael C. Cottrell, BA, M.S., was duly advised on Tuesday 6th July that the preliminary payment due to him would be satisfied on that date and that the Loan Facility would be in place on Thursday 8th July 2010.

• On Friday 9th July ‘the word went out’ that Mr Cottrell was not to be paid, the opposite of what had been categorically stated earlier.

• The payments agreed to and set out in the Basel List have not been affected as a direct consequence of this sabotage.

• Given the above, Gold Badges, US Law Enforcement, the corrupted US military under the former CIA Director Robert Gates, et al., are all in continuing dereliction of their duty in failing to arrest and lock up the Financial Terrorist George H. W. Bush Sr., either because they, like Joseph Biden, are all blackmailed and compromised, or because they fear that Mr Bush Sr.’s thuggists will murder them, and because they lack the intelligence to understand that Bush Sr.’s behaviour amounts to nothing more than the familiar childish, weak Psy-Ops BLUFF and bullying overfamiliar to students of the Mafiosi Godfathers, of which this criminal is the most ruthless and dangerous operative alive today.

• US law enforcement, Gold badges, feckless CIA operatives, cloth-eared, arrogant and corrupt US military cadres have accordingly dragged the reputation of the United States below sewer level in the eyes of all in the know at highest levels worldwide, with their gutless behaviour.

• Everyone who is anyone in positions of relevant importance worldwide is fully aware of this scandalous state of affairs, not least from this website, which has enormous clout ‘where it matters’. They had better exercise their powers to put an end to what is undoubtedly the biggest financial terrorism and corruption crisis in world history.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

LETTER FROM ATTORNEY-AT-LAW A. CLIFTON HODGES TO GEORGE OSBORNE,
BRITISH CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER: 8TH JULY 2010

HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
4 EAST HOLLY STREET
SUITE 202
PASADENA
CA 91103

Telephone: (626) 564-9797
Facsimile: (626) 564-9111

A. Clifton Hodges
James S. Kostas
Donald W. Ricketts*
*Of Counsel

July 8th, 2010

MOST URGENT

Sent Via E-Mail and Facsimile
The Right Honorable George Osborne, MP
Chancellor of the Exchequer
HM Treasury
Horse Guards Road
London SW1A 2HQ
Fax No. 020 7270 4580

Re: U.S. Dollar Refunding Project

Dear Honorable George Osborne:

I write to you once more in furtherance of matters raised in my prior correspondence of June 25, 2010; I understand that you have received instructions regarding my approach, and the various points raised in my earlier messages. Your assistance is most urgently required in addressing these matters, and the apparent disavowal of earlier agreements made and reaffirmed at previous G-8 meetings concerning the U.S. Dollar Refunding Project. I write on behalf of my clients Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., of Erie, Pennsylvania, USA, and his corporations: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., registered in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and Cottrell Securities Limited, registered in England and Wales.

The events of the past week are difficult to understand, and impossible to tolerate. I am advised and understand that the Lienholders executed a foreclosure and management takeover Fri-Sat 2-3 July of Deutsche Bank in Frankfurt, Germany, and of Bank of America in Charlotte, NC.

They “cleaned out” both banks of people working for the opponents and cleared toxic debt [including derivatives] off the bank balance sheets. Accordingly, they took DB out of the control of Angela Merkel and opponents in Germany, and they took BOA out of all possible control by the opponents in this country. As a result of these actions, it was expected that the World Global Settlement funds could be distributed this week.

These funds were available for distribution on Tuesday, July 6. Because George Bush Sr. was initiating interference, the Chinese authorities then had a “talk” with Bush Sr. By Wednesday afternoon a full Compliance Officer meeting had been conducted, and the appropriate parties were again prepared to initiate the transfers when Mr. Leon Panetta, pursuant to instructions from President Obama and George Bush Sr. issued instructions to the banking authorities to “placate but do not pay”; this prevented the authorities from making any such transfers. I am advised that the Chinese authorities then had another “talk” with Bush Sr., and all was ready again on today, July 7, and set to commence @ 3:00 PM EDT.

At approximately 3:00 PM EDT, I am told by several sources, George Bush Sr. apparently contacted President Obama and instructed him not to allow release of the funds. Bush Sr. then advised the President that if the funds were released, Bush would “go to the Supreme Court and have Obama’s Presidency terminated”. In accord with these instructions, the payout of the World Global Settlement funds has not proceeded.

THE PAYMENTS PREVIOUSLY AGREED TO AND SET FORTH ON THE BASEL LIST HAVE NOT BEEN MADE AS A DIRECT RESULT OF THESE CONTINUED DELAYS. Direct intervention through your good offices on behalf of the Royal Monarchal Power, is absolutely required to bring this matter to conclusion. To secure release of these Settlement funds, it is imperative that your power as one of the U.S. Treasury Lienholders, be exercised with such force as may be required to effect completion.

I respectfully plead that you utilize the inherent Royal Monarchal Power at the earliest possible moment to ensure completion of this funding. Thank you in advance for your assistance; please contact me directly if I can provide any additional information or help.

Sincerely,

HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
A. CLIFTON HODGES

ACH/gm

Cc: Lindell H. Bonney, Sr.
Colonel Dana Wilcox
Michael C. Cottrell, BA, MS
President Barack Obama
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II
Interpol, USNCB

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

THE FOLLOWING DATA HAS BEEN PUBLISHED AT THE FOOT
OF MOST OF THESE REPORTS FOR THE PAST THREE YEARS++:

• COMPILED BY U.S. SECURITIES EXPERT MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S..

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”.

Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge:
Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
NOTICES:

BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE.

In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest annual fee. This is done on-line in the usual way [direct with supplier].

Save

Advertisements

BIG U.S. BANKS CONFIRMED AS CRIMINAL ENTERPRISES

chrisstory

WACHOVIA WANTED TO SUE US FOR LABELLING IT A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE

Thursday 1 July 2010 00:01

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports on the US/German/French official criminality underlying this crisis.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock.

• We sell books DIRECT ONLY. We also supply to bookstores.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• OUR U.S. LANDLINES ARE NOW PERMANENTLY CLOSED BECAUSE OF U.S. HARASSMENT.
WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL, UK FAX OR VIA THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY.

• FOR LATEST INFORMATION ON OUR INTELLIGENCE PUBLICATIONS, SEE SECOND PANEL.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:
Note: Nothing should be construed from the fact that this report is about the criminal banks engaged in drug-money laundering, and not about the usual subject. We haven’t enough reliable material to elaborate further, yet, following the end of the abortive G-20 meeting in Toronto.

The following banks and currency exchanges are mentioned in this report:

American Express Bank International
Banco Santander SA
Bank of America
Casa de Cambio Puebla SA
Citigroup, Inc.
HSBC Holdings, London and Mexico
Mexican street currency-exchange firms [3,000]
Standard Chartered PLC, London
Wachovia, including London
Wells Fargo
Western Union

WACHOVIA, WELLS FARGO, BANK OF AMERICA ARE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISES, LIKE WE SAID
Some time ago, we learned that Wachovia had consulted its lawyers to establish whether they could sue us for describing the bank, among others, as a criminal enterprise. Their lawyers are believed to have advised them, in so many words, that, not least given investigative journalistic freedom of speech considerations, our observations represented ‘fair comment’. Behind that advice lay the knowledge that since Wachovia was involved in money laundering drug money, we might well know this and be able to prove it. So the matter was dropped.

As the entire ‘Black’ Octopus criminal carousel unravels faster than the kleptocracy can keep up with events, other sources are now starting to do our exposure work for us. Late in the day, as usual: but better late than never. We therefore take the opportunity to post, verbatim, the following article by Michael Smith for Bloomberg, which of course proves our point. Wachovia, Wells Fargo and Bank of America, for starters, are egregious criminal enterprises. Money laundering of drug proceeds is an unspeakable crime and the most senior officials of these institutions should be arrested and forced to suffer SEVERE consequences. But that isn’t happening.

‘MAINSTREAM’ MEDIA CONTINUE TO IGNORE THE CENTRAL ISSUE: RAMPANT CRIMINALITY
We are sick and tired of the way the so-called ‘mainstream’ media are waffling about every nuance under the sun and OMITTING the central issue: RAMPANT CRIMINALITY and the banks’ open-ended breaches of the law, and their arrogance based on fears that they might collapse.

Securitisation is ILLEGAL in the United States and in all Common Law countries, as we have demonstrated and proved with the aid of impeccable outside academic research. Yet there has been NO RESPONSE TO OUR EXPOSURE OF THIS FLOUTING OF THE RULE OF LAW, EITHER.

The following Bloomberg report indicates that, at long last, some ‘mainstream’ reporters have managed to lift themselves off their brains and to start exposing the truth. Separately, we have been exposing drug-trafficking operations in our title The Latin American Times, and continue to do so. You may also be interested to know that before his ‘switch’, following the ‘bait’ during which he stole the Editor’s $35,000 LOAN which should have been repaid at arms’ length plus 7% per annum for two years, on 11th June 2007, Wanta told the Editor: ‘If you expose the drug traffickers, they will kill you’. We listed that threat among the 37 threats against the Editor so far received.

THE BLOOMBERG REPORT STARTS HERE:
[Note: With interpolations by the Editor].

U.S. BANKS FINANCING MEXICO DRUG GANGS ADMITTED IN WELLS FARGO DEAL
By Michael Smith

June 29 (Bloomberg) — Just before sunset on April 10, 2006, a DC-9 jet landed at the international airport in the port city of Ciudad del Carmen, 500 miles east of Mexico City. As soldiers on the ground approached the plane, the crew tried to shoo them away, saying there was a dangerous oil leak. So the troops grew suspicious and searched the jet.

They found 128 black suitcases, packed with 5.7 tons of cocaine, valued at $100 million. The stash was supposed to have been delivered from Caracas to drug traffickers in Toluca, near Mexico City, Mexican prosecutors later found. Law enforcement officials also discovered something else.

The smugglers had bought the DC-9 with laundered funds they transferred through two of the biggest banks in the U.S.: Wachovia Corp. and Bank of America Corp., Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its August 2010 issue.

This was no isolated incident. Wachovia, it turns out, had made a habit of helping move money for Mexican drug smugglers. Wells Fargo & Co., which bought Wachovia in 2008, has admitted in court that its unit failed to monitor and report suspected money laundering by narcotics traffickers — including the cash used to buy four planes that shipped a total of 22 tons of cocaine.

The admission came in an agreement that Charlotte, North Carolina-based Wachovia struck with federal prosecutors in March, and it sheds light on the largely undocumented role of U.S. banks in contributing to the violent drug trade that has convulsed Mexico for the past four years.

BLATANT DISREGARD FOR THE RULE OF LAW AND BASIC MORALITY
Wachovia admitted it didn’t do enough to spot illicit funds in handling $378.4 billion for Mexican-currency-exchange houses from 2004 to 2007. That’s the largest violation of the Bank Secrecy Act, an anti-money-laundering law, in U.S. history — a sum equal to one-third of Mexico’s current gross domestic product.

“Wachovia’s blatant disregard for our banking laws gave international cocaine cartels a virtual carte blanche to finance their operations”, says Jeffrey Sloman, the Federal Prosecutor who handled the case.

Since 2006, more than 22,000 people have been killed in drug-related battles that have raged mostly along the 2,000-mile (3,200-kilometer) border that Mexico shares with the U.S. In the Mexican city of Ciudad Juarez, just across the border from El Paso, Texas, 700 people had been murdered this year as of mid- June. Six Juarez police officers were slaughtered by automatic weapons fire in a midday ambush in April.

Rondolfo Torre, the leading candidate for governor in the Mexican border state of Tamaulipas, was gunned down yesterday, less than a week before elections in which violence related to drug trafficking was a central issue.

45000 MEXICAN TROOPS DEPLOYED AGAINST THE CARTELS
Mexican President Felipe Calderon vowed to crush the drug cartels when he took office in December 2006, and he’s since deployed 45,000 troops to fight the cartels.

They’ve had little success.

Among the dead are police, soldiers, journalists and ordinary citizens. The United States has ‘pledged’ Mexico $1.1 billion in the past two years to aid in the fight against narcotics cartels.

[EDITOR’S INSERT: This is absurd. Under the standard double-mindedness, dialectical non-ethic that characterises the criminalist behaviour of elements of the US Government, law enforcement and the Drug Enforcement Administration battle valiantly against the proliferation of Mexican drug gangs, which now operate in every corner of the United States. Meanwhile, the drug offensive was organised and orchestrated by CIA operatives in Latin America in the 1970s and 1980s, aided by Israeli ‘Black’ intelligence headed by David Kimche (who died of brain cancer on 8th March 2010) and Michael Harari. Their involvement is proven by the Cutolo Affidavit dated 11th March 1980.

The military officer (Cutolo) was subsequently murdered, along with ‘Bo’ Baker and others because of their knowledge inter alia of this criminal activity. The barrels of precursor chemicals found in the forests fo Colombia and elsewhere did not materialse from nowhere. The ‘Anglo-Saxons’ and their nefarious Israeli cutouts took over and organised the disparate competing Latin American gangs, establishing a self-perpetuating scoourge run by peasant criminals: a perfect cut-out.

Incidentally, after David Kimche died, The Daily Telegraph boobed by publishing a photograph in which he was shown (engaged in negotiations with the Lebanese in 1972) but wrongly attributed. We have published a recent issue of Arab-Asian Affairs (which title we bought unknowingly from Kimche’s brother, Jon Kimche, in 1975). Jon Kimche used to come to our office, as he continued for a time as Editor (until he doubled his price, whereupon we fired him). We are therefore familiar with the facial characteristics of the Kimche brothers. Investigations by this service revealed that ALL picture representations of David Kimche published in The Jerusalem Post, Haaretz, The Daily Telegraph, The Times and US newspapers have been FRAUDULENT all along.

They have all identified several individuals wrongly as David Kimche and continue to do so after his death. Why? To protect ongoing and past, highly incriminating and sensitive drug operations].

In May, President Barack Obama said he’d send 1,200 National Guard troops, adding to the 17,400 agents on the U.S. side of the border to help stem drug traffic and illegal immigration.

Behind the carnage in Mexico is an industry that supplies hundreds of tons of cocaine, heroin, marijuana and methamphetamines to Americans. The cartels have built a network of dealers in 231 U.S. cities, taking in about $39 billion in sales annually, according to the Justice Department.

ITS THE CRIMINAL BANKS THAT SHOULD BE PROSECUTED AND MADE TO SUFFER
Twenty million people in the U.S. regularly use illegal drugs, spurring street crime and wrecking families. Narcotics cost the U.S. economy $215 billion a year — enough to cover health care for 30.9 million Americans — in overburdened courts, prisons and hospitals and lost productivity.

“It’s the banks laundering money for the cartels that finances the tragedy”, says Martin Woods, Director of Wachovia’s anti-money-laundering unit in London from 2006 to 2009.

• Woods says he quit the bank in disgust after executives ignored his documentation that drug dealers were funneling money through Wachovia’s branch network.

“If you don’t see the correlation between the money laundering by banks and the 22,000 people killed in Mexico, you’re missing the point”, Woods says.

WACHOVIA ONE OF MANY U.S. AND EUROPEAN BANKS HANDLING DRUG MONEY
Wachovia is just one of the U.S. and European banks that have been used for drug money laundering. For the past two decades, Latin American drug traffickers have gone to U.S. banks to cleanse their dirty cash, says Paul Campo, head of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration’s financial crimes unit.

Miami-based American Express Bank International paid fines in both 1994 and 2007 after admitting that it had failed to spot and report drug dealers laundering money through its accounts. Drug traffickers used accounts at Bank of America in Oklahoma City to buy three planes that carried 10 tons of cocaine, according to Mexican court filings.

Federal agents caught people who work for Mexican cartels depositing illicit funds in Bank of America accounts in Atlanta, Chicago and Brownsville, Texas, from 2002 to 2009. Mexican drug dealers used shell companies to open accounts at London-based HSBC Holdings Plc, Europe’s biggest bank by assets, an investigation by the Mexican Finance Ministry found.

CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE BANKS HIDE BEHIND RHETORIC AND CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY
Those two banks weren’t accused of wrongdoing. Bank of America spokeswoman Shirley Norton and HSBC spokesman Roy Caple say laws bar them from discussing specific clients. They say their banks strictly follow the government rules.

“Bank of America takes its anti-money-laundering responsibilities very seriously”. Norton says. [EDITOR: Translation: This is a deliberately vacuous, meaningless and empty statement].

A Mexican judge on January 22 accused the owners of six centros cambiarios, or money changers, in Culiacan and Tijuana of laundering drug funds through their accounts at the Mexican units of Banco Santander SA, Citigroup Inc. and HSBC, according to court documents filed in the case.

The money changers are in jail while being tried. Citigroup, HSBC and Santander, which is the largest Spanish bank by assets, weren’t accused of any wrongdoing.

The three banks say Mexican law bars them from commenting on the case, adding that they each carefully enforce anti-money-laundering programs.

HSBC has stopped accepting dollar deposits in Mexico, and Citigroup no longer allows noncustomers to change dollars there. Citigroup detected suspicious activity in the Tijuana accounts, reported it to regulators and closed the accounts, spokesman Paulo Carreno says. [EDITOR: Yeah, after the event and after the temperature got too hot].

FOCUS IS ON THE CARTELS: BUT THEY CAN’T OPERATE WITHOUT CRIMINAL BANKS
On June 15, the Mexican Finance Ministry announced it would set limits for banks on cash deposits in dollars. Mexico’s drug cartels have become multinational criminal enterprises.

Some of the gangs have delved into other illegal activities such as gunrunning, kidnapping and smuggling people across the border, as well as into seemingly legitimate areas such as trucking, travel services and air cargo transport, according to the us Justice Department’s National Drug Intelligence Center.

These criminal empires have no choice but to use the global banking system to finance their businesses, Mexican Senator Felipe Gonzalez says.

“With so much cash, the only way to move this money is through the banks”, says Gonzalez, who represents a central Mexican state and chairs the senate public safety committee.

[EDITOR: In January 2009, Sr. Maria Antonio Costa, head of the Vienna-based UNDOC, told the Austrian journal Profil in an interview that the only liquidity in the interbank sector during the second half of 2008 was drug money. Actually, he meant from the discontinuity that took place on 10-12 September, after which the Editor received three gunshots on our voicemail: see passim].

Gonzalez, a member of Calderon’s National Action Party, carries a .38 revolver for protection.

“I know this won’t stop the narcos when they come through that door with machine guns”. he says, pointing to the entrance to his office. “But at least I’ll take one with me”.

NO BANK MORE CLOSELY LINKED TO MEXICAN DRUG LAUNDERING THAN WACHOVIA
No bank has been more closely connected with Mexican money laundering than Wachovia. Founded in 1879, Wachovia became the largest bank by assets in the southeastern U.S. by 1900. After the Great Depression, some savvy people in North Carolina called the bank “Walk-Over-Ya” because it had foreclosed on farms in the region.

By 2008, Wachovia was the sixth-largest American lender, and it faced $26 billion in losses from subprime mortgage loans. That cost Wachovia Chief Executive Officer Kennedy Thompson his job in June 2008.

Six months later, San Francisco-based Wells Fargo, which dates from 1852, bought Wachovia for $12.7 billion, creating the largest network of bank branches in the U.S. Thompson, who now works for private-equity firm Aquiline Capital Partners LLC in New York, declined to comment.

As Wachovia’s balance sheet was bleeding, its legal woes were mounting. In the three years leading up to Wachovia’s agreement with the Justice Department, grand juries served the bank with 6,700 subpoenas requesting information.

WACHOVIA REACTED LETHARGICALLY TO THIS GRAND JURY ONSLAUGHT
The bank didn’t react quickly enough to the prosecutors’ requests and failed to hire enough investigators, the U.S. Treasury Department said in March. After a 22-month investigation, the Justice Department on March 12 charged Wachovia with violating the Bank Secrecy Act by failing to run an effective anti-money-laundering program.

Five days later, Wells Fargo promised in a Miami federal courtroom to revamp its detection systems. Wachovia’s new owner paid $160 million in fines and penalties, less than 2 percent of its $12.3 billion profit in 2009.

If Wells Fargo keeps its pledge, the U.S. government will, according to the agreement, drop all charges against the bank in March 2011. [EDITOR: WHAT A SCANDAL].

Wells Fargo regrets that some of Wachovia’s former anti-money-laundering efforts fell short, spokeswoman Mary Eshet says. Wells Fargo has invested $42 million in the past three years to improve its anti-money-laundering program and has been working with regulators, she says.

‘AFTER THE HORSES HAVE BOLTED’ WHINING
“We have substantially increased the caliber and number of staff in our international investigations group, and we also significantly upgraded the monitoring software”, Eshet says. The agreement bars the bank from contesting or contradicting the facts in its admission.

The bank declined to answer specific questions, including how much it made by handling $378.4 billion — including $4 billion of cash-from Mexican exchange companies. [EDITOR: PROTECTED].

The 1970 Bank Secrecy Act requires banks to report all cash transactions above $10,000 to regulators and to tell the Government about other suspected money-laundering activity.

Big banks employ hundreds of investigators and spend millions of dollars on software programs to scour accounts. [EDITOR: GREAT. BUT HASN’T ADDRESSED THE BANKS’ CRIMINALITY].

No big U.S. bank — Wells Fargo included — has ever been indicted for violating the Bank Secrecy Act or any other Federal law. Instead, the Justice Department settles criminal charges by using deferred-prosecution agreements, in which a bank pays a fine and promises do it again.

BANKS PROTECTED BY FEARS THAT A BANK COLLAPSE WOULD IMPLODE THE SYSTEM
Large banks are protected from indictments by a variant of the too-big-to-fail theory.

Indicting a big bank could trigger a mad dash by investors to dump shares and cause panic in financial markets, says Jack Blum, a U.S. Senate investigator for 14 years and a consultant to international banks and brokerage firms on money laundering.

The theory is like a get-out-of-jail-free card for big banks, Blum says. [EDITOR: Jack Blum is a highly respected investigator, a man of the highest integrity and calibre].

“There’s no capacity to regulate or punish them because they’re too big to be threatened with failure”, Blum says. “They seem to be willing to do anything that improves their bottom line, until they’re caught”. [EDITOR: ACCURATE, ACCURATE, ACCURATE, ACCURATE].

Wachovia’s run-in with Federal prosecutors hasn’t troubled investors. Wells Fargo’s stock traded at $30.86 on March 24, up 1 percent in the week after the March 17 agreement was announced.

Moving money is central to the drug trade — from the cash that people tape to their bodies as they cross the U.S.-Mexican border, to the $100,000 wire transfers they send from Mexican exchange houses to big U.S. banks.

BORDER FENCE DOESN’T STOP ANYONE. A HUGE WALL IS NECESSARY
In Tijuana, 15 miles south of San Diego, Gustavo Rojas has lived for a quarter of a century in a shack in the shadow of the 10-foot-high (3-meter-high) steel border fence that separates the U.S. and Mexico there. He points to holes burrowed under the barrier.

“They go across with drugs and come back with cash,” Rojas, 75, says.

“This fence doesn’t stop anyone”.

Drug money moves back and forth across the border in an endless cycle. In the U.S., couriers take the cash from drug sales to Mexico — as much as $29 billion a year, according to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. That would be about 319 tons of $100 bills. [EDITOR: NO. $45 BILLION].

They hide it in cars and trucks to smuggle into Mexico. There, cartels pay people to deposit some of the cash into Mexican banks and branches of international banks. The narcos launder much of what’s left through money changers.

DRUG MONEY LAUNDERED THROUGH STREET MONEY TRADERS
Anyone who has been to Mexico is familiar with these street-corner money changers; Mexican regulators say there are at least 3,000 of them from Tijuana to Cancun, usually displaying large signs advertising the day’s dollar-peso exchange rate.

Mexican banks are regulated by the National Banking and Securities Commission, which has an anti-money-laundering unit; the money changers are supposedly policed by Mexico’s Tax Service Administration, which has no such unit.

By law, the money changers have to demand identification from anyone exchanging more than $500. They also have to report transactions higher than $5,000 to regulators.

The cartels get around these requirements by employing legions of individuals — including relatives, maids and gardeners — to convert small amounts of dollars into pesos or to make deposits in local banks. After that, cartels wire the money to a multinational bank.

SMALL MONEY EXCHANGES ARE CALLED SMURFS
The people making the small money exchanges are known as Smurfs, after the cartoon characters.

“They can use an army of people like Smurfs and go through $1 million before lunchtime”, says Jerry Robinette, who oversees U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations along the border in east Texas.

The U.S. Treasury has been warning banks about big Mexican- currency-exchange firms laundering drug money since 1996. By 2004, many U.S. banks had closed their accounts with these companies, which are known as casas de cambio.

Wachovia ignored warnings by regulators and police, per the deferred-prosecution agreement.

“As early as 2004, Wachovia understood the risk”, the bank admitted in court. “Despite these warnings, Wachovia remained in the business”.

One customer that Wachovia took on in 2004 was Casa de Cambio Puebla SA, a Puebla, Mexico-based currency-exchange company. Pedro Alatorre, who ran a Puebla branch in Mexico City, had created front companies for cartels, according to a pending Mexican criminal case against him.

FEDERAL INDICTMENT IN MIAMI
A Federal Grand Jury in Miami indicted Puebla, Alatorre and three other executives in February 2008 for drug trafficking and money laundering. In May 2008, the Justice Department sought extradition of the suspects, saying they used shell firms to launder $720 million through U.S. banks.

Alatorre has been in a Mexican jail for 2 1/2 years. He denies any wrongdoing, his lawyer Mauricio Moreno says. Alatorre has made no court-filed responses in the U.S.

During the period in which Wachovia admitted to moving money out of Mexico for Puebla, couriers carrying clear plastic bags stuffed with cash went to the branch Alatorre operated at the Mexico City airport, according to surveillance reports by Mexican police.

Alatorre opened accounts at HSBC on behalf of front companies, Mexican investigators found.

Puebla executives used the stolen identities of 74 people to launder money through Wachovia accounts, Mexican prosecutors say in court-filed reports.

WACHOVIA NEVER REPORTED ANY TRANSACTIONS AS SUSPICIOUS
“Wachovia handled all the transfers, and they never reported any as suspicious”, says Jose Luis Marmolejo, former head of the Mexican Attorney General’s financial crimes, now in private practice.

In November 2005 and January 2006, Wachovia transferred a total of $300,000 from Puebla to a Bank of America account in Oklahoma City, according to information in the Alatorre cases in the United States and Mexico.

Drug smugglers used the funds to buy the DC-9 through Oklahoma City aircraft broker U.S. Aircraft Titles Inc., according to financial records cited in the Mexican criminal case. U.S. Aircraft Titles President Sue White declined to comment.

On April 5, 2006, a pilot flew the plane from St. Petersburg, Florida, to Caracas to pick up the cocaine, according to the DEA. Five days later, troops seized the plane in Ciudad del Carmen and burned the drugs at a nearby army base.

WACHOVIA KNEW PERFECTLY WELL WHAT WAS GOING ON
“I am sure Wachovia knew what was going on”, says jJose Marmolejo, who oversaw the criminal investigation into Wachovia’s customers.

“It went on too long and they made too much money not to have known”.

At Wachovia’s anti-money-laundering unit in London, Woods and his colleague Jim DeFazio, in Charlotte, say they suspected that drug dealers were using the bank to move funds.

Woods, a former Scotland Yard investigator, spotted illegible signatures and other suspicious markings on traveler’s checks from Mexican exchange companies, he said in a September 2008 letter to the U.K. Financial Services Authority. He sent copies of the letter to the DEA and Treasury Department in the United States.

Woods, 45, says his bosses instructed him to keep quiet and tried to have him fired, according to his letter to the FSA. In one meeting, a bank official insisted Woods shouldn’t have filed suspicious activity reports to the Government, as both US and UK laws require.

LONDON WACHOVIA BOSSES TRIES TO SILENCE WHISTLEBLOWER WHO THEN LEFT BANK
“I was shocked by the content and outcome of the meeting, genuinely traumatized”, Woods wrote.

In the U.S., DeFazio, a Federal Bureau of Investigation agent for 21 years, says he told bank executives in 2005 that the DEA was probing the transfers through Wachovia to buy the planes.

Bank executives spurned recommendations to close suspicious accounts, DeFazio, 63, says.

“I think they looked at the money and said, ‘The hell with it. We’re going to bring it in, and look at all the money we’ll make'”, DeFazio says.

“I didn’t want anything from them”, he says. “I just wanted to get out”.

Woods, who resigned from Wachovia in May 2009, now advises banks on how to combat money laundering. He declined to discuss details of Wachovia’s actions.

U.S. Comptroller of the Currency John Dugan told Woods in a March 19 2010 letter that his efforts had helped the United States build its case against Wachovia. He wrote:

“You demonstrated great courage and integrity by speaking up when you saw problems”.

It was the Puebla investigation that led U.S. authorities to the broader probe of Wachovia. On May 16, 2007, DEA agents conducted a raid of Wachovia’s international banking offices in Miami. They had a court order to seize Puebla’s accounts.

U.S. prosecutors and investigators then scrutinized the bank’s dealings with Mexican-currency-exchange firms. That led to the March deferred-prosecution agreement.

With Puebla’s Wachovia accounts seized, Alatorre and his partners shifted their laundering scheme to HSBC, according to financial documents cited in the Mexican criminal case against Alatorre.

In the three weeks after the DEA raided Wachovia, two of Alatorre’s front companies, Grupo ETPB SA and Grupo Rahero SC, made 12 cash deposits totaling $1 million at an HSBC Mexican branch, Mexican investigators found.

DRUG MONEY NOW LAUNDERED THROUGH HSBC TO BUY ANOTHER PLANE
The funds financed a Beechcraft King Air 200 plane that police seized on December 29, 2007, in Cuernavaca, 50 miles south of Mexico City, according to information in the case against Alatorre.

For years, Federal authorities watched as the wife and daughter of Oscar Oropeza, a drug smuggler working for the Matamoros-based Gulf Cartel, deposited stacks of cash at a Bank of America branch on Boca Chica Boulevard in Brownsville, Texas, less than 3 miles from the border.

Investigator Robinette sits in his pickup truck across the street from that branch. It’s a one-story, tan stucco building next to a Kentucky Fried Chicken outlet. Robinette discusses the Oropeza case with Tom Salazar, an agent who investigated the family.

“Everybody in there knew who they were — the tellers, everyone”, Salazar says.

“The bank never came to us, though”. [EDITOR: COURSE NOT. IT’S A C.I.A. CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE]

MICRO-MONEY LAUNDERING TECHNIQUE
The Oropeza case gives a new, literal meaning to the term money laundering. Oropeza’s wife, Tina Marie, and daughter Paulina Marie, deposited stashes of $20 bills several times a day into Bank of America accounts, Salazar says. Bank employees knew the Oropezas by smelling their money.

“I asked the tellers what they were talking about, and they said the money had this sweet smell like Bounce, those sheets you throw into the dryer”, Salazar says. “They told me that when they opened the vault, the smell of Bounce just poured out”.

Oropeza, 48, was arrested 820 miles from Brownsville, Texas.. On May 31, 2007, police in Saraland, Alabama, stopped him on a traffic violation. Checking his record, they learned of the investigation in Texas. They searched the van and discovered 84 kilograms (185 pounds) of cocaine hidden under a false floor. That allowed Federal agents to freeze Oropeza’s bank accounts and search his marble-floored home in Brownsville, Robinette says.

Inside, investigators found a supply of Bounce alongside the clothes dryer.

All three Oropezas pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court in Brownsville, TX, to drug and money-laundering charges in March and April 2008. Oscar Oropeza was sentenced to 15 years in prison; his wife was ordered to serve 10 months and his daughter got 6 months.

Bank of America’s Norton says: “We not only fulfilled our regulatory obligation, but we proactively worked with law enforcement on these matters”. [EDITOR: NEFARIOUS HUMBUG].

Prosecutors have tried to halt money laundering at American Express Bank International twice. In 1994, the bank, then a subsidiary of New York-based American Express Co., pledged not to allow money laundering again after two employees were convicted in a criminal case involving drug trafficker Juan Garcia Abrego.

In 1994, the bank paid $14 million to settle. Five years later, drug money again flowed through American Express Bank. Between 1999 and 2004, the bank failed to stop clients from laundering $55 million of narcotics funds, the bank admitted in a deferred-prosecution accord in August 2007.

It paid $65 million to the United States and promised not to break the law again. The government dismissed the criminal charge a year later. American Express sold the bank to the London-based Standard Chartered PLC in February 2008 for $823 million.

WESTERN UNION TURNED A BLIND EYE TO DRUG-MONEY LAUNDERING
Banks aren’t the only financial institutions that have turned a blind eye to drug cartels in moving illicit funds. Western Union Co., the world’s largest money transfer firm, agreed to pay $94 million in February 2010 to settle civil and criminal investigations by the Arizona Attorney General’s office.

Undercover state police posing as drug dealers bribed Western Union employees to illegally transfer money, says Cameron Holmes, an assistant Attorney General.

“Their allegiance was to the smugglers”, Holmes says. “What they thought about during work was ‘How may I please my highest- spending customers the most?'”

Workers in more than 20 Western Union offices allowed the customers to use multiple names, pass fictitious identifications and smudge their fingerprints on documents, court records say.

“In all the time we did undercover operations, we never once had a bribe turned down”, says Holmes, citing court affidavits.

Western Union has made significant improvements, it complies with anti-money-laundering laws and works closely with regulators and police, spokesman Tom Fitzgerald says.

For four years, Mexican authorities have been fighting a losing battle against the cartels. The police are often two steps behind the criminals. Near the southeastern corner of Texas, in Matamoros, more than 50 combat troops surround a police station.

US officers take two suspected drug traffickers inside for questioning. Nearby, two young men wearing white T-shirts and baggy pants watch and whisper into radios. These are los halcones (the falcons), whose job is to let the cartel bosses know what the police are doing.

BILLIONS MOVED ACROSS BORDERS ROUTINELY: THERE IS NO CHANGE
While the police are outmaneuvered and outgunned, ordinary Mexicans live in fear. Rojas, the man who lives in the Tijuana slum near the border fence, recalls cowering in his home as smugglers shot it out with the police.

“The only way to survive is to stay out of the way and hope the violence, the bullets, don’t come for you,” Rojas says.

To make their criminal enterprises work, the drug cartels of Mexico need to move billions of dollars across borders. That’s how they finance the purchase of drugs, planes, weapons and safe houses, Senator Gonzalez says.

“They are multinational businesses, after all”, says Gonzalez, as he slowly loads his revolver at his desk in his Mexico City office. “And they cannot work without a bank.”

To contact the reporter on this story:
Michael Smith in Santiago, Chile, at mssmith@bloomberg.net.
Last Updated: June 29, 2010 00:00 EDT

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

THE FOLLOWING DATA HAS BEEN PUBLISHED AT THE FOOT
OF MOST OF THESE REPORTS FOR THE PAST THREE YEARS++:

• COMPILED BY U.S. SECURITIES EXPERT MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S..

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”.

Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge:
Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
NOTICES:

BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE.

In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest annual fee. This is done on-line in the usual way [direct with supplier].

OBAMA LIES AND DOUBLE-CROSSES THE G-8 AND G-20

cropped-chrisstory

TORONTO ATTENDEES FALSELY TOLD THAT PAYMENTS WERE MADE ON THURSDAY 24TH JUNE. CIA’S BANK OF AMERICA LIES THAT PAYOUTS TO BONNEY OCCURRED.

Sunday 27 June 2010 01:01

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

IN REALITY A FURTHER $4.7 TRILLION HAS BEEN STOLEN
ON TOP OF $1.8 TRILLION STOLEN FROM PAYOUT FUNDS ON 10TH JUNE
UPDATE: Sunday pm UK: The $4.7 trillion has been found. It had been placed on overnight.

‘PRESIDENT’ OBAMA DELIBERATELY DECEIVES THE G-8 AND G-20 DELEGATIONS

UPDATE: G-20 DELEGATES LAUGHED AT OBAMA WHEN HE LIED TO THEM THAT THE
PAYMENTS HAD BEEN EFFECTED. REASON: THEY HAD ALL RECEIVED COPIES OF
ATTORNEY HODGES’ LETTER, POSTED BELOW, TO GEORGE OSBORNE, THE BRITISH CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER. THIS CONTAINS EXTREMELY DAMAGING FACTS.
So the G-20 powers are ALL FULLY APPRAISED of the Obama White House’s criminality.

LETTER FROM LAWYER A. CLIFTON HODGES TO GEORGE OSBORNE,
BRITISH CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER, DATED 25TH JUNE 2010:
THIS LETTER CONTAINS DYNAMITE INTELLIGENCE

OTHER EVIL DEVELOPMENTS, IN SUMMARY

MALICIOUS RUMOURS ABOUT THE QUEEN

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports on the US/German/French official criminality underlying this crisis.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock.

• We sell books DIRECT ONLY. We also supply to bookstores.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• OUR U.S. LANDLINES ARE NOW PERMANENTLY CLOSED BECAUSE OF U.S. HARASSMENT.
WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL, UK FAX OR VIA THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY.

• FOR LATEST INFORMATION ON OUR INTELLIGENCE PUBLICATIONS, SEE SECOND PANEL.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

OBAMA DELIBERATELY DECEIVES THE G-8 AND G-20 DELEGATIONS
In a further confirmation of ‘President’ Obama’s serial and embedded criminality and Financial Terrorism, he has tried to bamboozle the G-8 and G-20 attendees in Toronto into accepting false assurances that the hijacked assembled payouts were effected on 24th June 2010.

No-one in attendance believes a word this criminal says any more, given his successive lies, the last of which we reported prior to the preceding report, being ‘President’ Obama’s ultra vires intervention to delay the payments over a long weekend to 1st June, a reckless move which laid him open to litigation as being personally responsible for that delay (having pierced the veil of his office and acted outside its parameters), and thus personally liable to disgorge billions of dollars plus accrued compound interest.

• When he leaves office he may be sued for billions of dollars.

In response to ‘President’ Obama’s lies and his blatant deception of the G-8 and G-20 powers, we publish below the letter from Mr A. Clifton Hodges to the Rt Hon George Osborne, British Chancellor of the Exchequer dated 25th June 2010. It contains dynamite intelligence.

You will readily understand that by presenting the damning intelligence contained in this lawyer’s letter by this means, the Editor is spared unavoidably ill-informed bombardment by people who cannot possibly be expected to know the gory detail of what is going on behind the scenes. Such intelligence can only be procured from the actual sources, not from secondary, tertiary or hearsay provenance.

This implies no criticism whatsoever of outside concerned parties who are as anxious as we are for this snakepit of gross evildoers to be consigned to the everlasting lake of fire as soon as possible: which of course is where every single one of them is headed anyway.

Contained in Mr Hodges’ letter to George Osborne is confirmation that instead of the monies being released, $4.7 trillion was diverted/stolen, on top of the $1.8 trillion that was stolen on 10th June 2010, which we report here for the first time.

The diverted $4.7 trillion is of course being illegally traded over this weekend.

It is correct that resistance to the Settlements and the US Dollar Refunding Programme is motivated, in accordance with the orders of the Head Serpent, George H. W. Bush and his criminal CIA-apparat, from whom (as you will see in Mr Hodges’ letter, Financial Terrorist ‘President’ Obama takes his instructions), by the reality that the releases and the US Dollar Refunding Programme will completely decapitate the entire secret power of the criminal Financial Terrorism Octopus once and for all. This is the secret essence of this crisis.

That’s why the US Congress, implicated up to its criminalist eyeballs, has been ducking and weaving, to try to preserve the Fraudulent Finance carousel which is what keeps the criminal enterprise banks alive. The Basel III norms have also been modified somewhat. The new US banking legislation is unspeakably dreadful, the product of twisted, compromised minds bent on maximising wriggle room, rather than resolution.

Speculation that the mechanism of the Dollar Refunding Programme will leave the United States permanently indebted to HM The Queen, is idle, ill-informed claptrap.

The mechanism is self-financing, has no implications for the United States and its people apart from the singular fact that it showers windfall tax accruals transparently onto the unwilling US Treasury’s books, thereby reversing the century-long US deficit-financing death trap, which the criminalised US Treasury has been seeking to retain contrary to all logic, common sense and morality, in order to preserve the bankers’ ramp Financial Terrorism carousel.

• The lender is repaid from the proceeds of the on-the-books trades after UK and US taxation.

Following the expiry of ‘President’ Obama’s fake 1st June deadline, the CIA was at a loss to know what to do next; so they compiled dossiers based on false data and false witness to try to discredit Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., and Attorney-at-Law Mr A. Clifton Hodges, which they sent to MI-6 and possibly also to Buckingham Palace.

MI-6 responded by asking the MI-6 approved Gold Badge (i.e. also CIA) Paymaster his opinion of the dossiers. Mr Bonney responded by telling MI-6 that they were ‘largely wrong’, believed to be an understatement. He could hardly have done otherwise, as it was Mr Bonney himself who investigated Mr Cottrell and gave him a completely clean bill of health. Our sources inform us that the dossiers were ‘laughed at’ on this side of the Atlantic.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

LETTER FROM LAWYER A. CLIFTON HODGES TO GEORGE OSBORNE,
BRITISH CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER, DATED 25TH JUNE 2010:
THIS LETTER CONTAINS DYNAMITE INTELLIGENCE

HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
4 EAST HOLLY STREET
SUITE 202
PASADENA
CA 91103

Telephone: (626) 564-9797
Facsimile: (626) 564-9111

A. Clifton Hodges
James S. Kostas
Donald W. Ricketts*
Of Counsel

June 25, 2010

Sent Via E-Mail and Facsimile:
The Right Honorable George Osborne, MP
Chancellor of the Exchequer
HM Treasury
Whitehall
London SW1A 2HQ
Fax No. 020 7270 4580

Re: U.S. Dollar Refunding Project

Dear Honorable George Osborne:

I write to you on a most urgent basis in furtherance of matters raised in my prior correspondence to Buckingham Palace; I understand that you have been instructed and made aware of my approach, and the various points raised in my earlier notices. Your assistance is most urgently required in addressing matters of world financial concern, and the apparent disavowal of earlier promises to accept U.S. Dollar Refunding Project agreements made and reaffirmed at earlier G-8 meetings.

I most recently wrote to the Palace on May 28, 2010 to solicit the assistance of your government in securing the release of funds being held in the U.S. which are required for implementation of the U.S. Dollar Refunding Project. I write to you again in furtherance to that subject, on behalf of my clients Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., of Erie, Pennsylvania, USA, and his corporations: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., registered in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and Cottrell Securities Limited, registered in England and Wales.

The events of the past few days are particularly troubling. As of the afternoon of June 25, 2010, I am advised and understand the following:

World Global Settlement funds had been collected and were in the custody of the Bank of America in Richmond, Virginia.

Said funds were sufficient to cover all disbursements to be made by the authority of the Paymaster for the purpose of concluding these transfers in accord with the BASEL agenda.

On May 27, 2010 US President Barack Obama personally intervened in the scheduled May 27 release of funds, and instructed that the funds be held until after the U.S. Memorial Day Holiday.

I personally wrote to President Obama, protesting his actions, a copy of which was also submitted to the British Royal Monarchal Power; Mr. L.H. Bonney, Sr. personally verified that a copy of the letter was submitted to, and received by, HM The Queen via MI-5 and MI-6.

US Vice President Biden was also provided a copy of the May 27, 2010 letter and acknowledged the veracity of President Obama taking direction from former President G.H.W. Bush; he indicated that President Obama’s citizenship status was being used as very effective leverage against the President, and also admitted that he was personally compromised.

Mr. L. H. Bonney, Sr. has confirmed at Bank of America that no communication has yet been received from President Obama regarding authorization for release of the Settlement funds.

On June 23, 2010 Mr. Bonney advised that “they are letting the Obama/Bank of America people believe they are in control” giving them rope to hang themselves, and after 5:00 PM the funds will be released to his custody; he also advised that the Chinese lien-holder will act on Thursday in accord with the Special Foreclosure.

Although moneys for complete payout were confirmed by the Federal Reserve/Bank of America, US Vice President Biden was at the same time advising authorities that he is ready to “move on, and out of the White House”.

On Thursday, June 24, 2010 Mr. L.H. Bonney, Sr. advised that payment must be released to him by noon or there would be “hell to pay”; Vice President Biden was unable to obtain immunity such that he could “move on” even though Hilary Clinton had voiced a desire to be appointed Vice President of the United States.

The Chinese lien-holder was insisting on payment release after funds had been reconfirmed, even though a further attempt was made to steal the funds by Obama’s California banker, Carlson; as a result, all of Obama’s bankers and most (if not all) of the Bushs’ bankers have now been arrested.

In the evening of June 24, a video tele-conference between the “company” [the CIA] and the Connecticut Trustee, Paul Sigue, regarding the release/movement of funds was held; there is a concern that on release, stolen funds will be moved and paid to the Bush/Clinton cabal.

Mr. Bonney also advised that the Foreclosure Date is not June 24, 2010 – it is actually July2, 2010; although Mr. Bonney advised that three trusts would be paid out on June 24, such payout would not include payment for the U.S. Dollar Refunding Project, or anyone associated with it; Dana Wilcox later advised that any payouts made would include all parties.

[Editor: The obfuscation and redirection, confusion-maximising dialectic as usual].

As of 10:30 AM EDT this morning of June 25, 2010, the display screens at Bank of America, Richmond, Virginia were blank, indicating that the funds had been removed; no information was available to any party or payee regarding the location and/or distribution of such funds before 12:30 PM, which results in a further delay until Tuesday, June 29, 2010.

Just prior to the 12:30 PM deadline, Dana Wilcox verified that at least $ 4.7 Trillion of the funds had been removed to an unknown location; accordingly, he advised Mr. Lindell H. Bonney, Sr. to call MI-6, Her Majesty the Queen, Geneva, Switzerland, and San Marino, Italy, to inform them that the FUNDS ARE MISSING and HAVE NOT BEEN PAID OUT or released to Mr. Bonney.

All members and attendees at the G-8 and G-20 meetings should be made aware that THE PAYMENTS PREVIOUSLY AGREED TO AND SET FORTH ON THE BASEL LIST HAVE NOT BEEN MADE, AS A DIRECT RESULT OF THE ACTIONS OF OBAMA, ET. AL. [see above].

As of 1:15 PM EDT this afternoon, the Bank of America in Richmond is now alleging that THE PAYOUTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND RELEASED TO MR. BONNEY

I am persuaded by these facts, that direct intervention of the Royal Monarchal Power through your good offices, is absolutely required to bring this matter to conclusion. To secure release of these Settlement funds, it is now imperative that this power, as a U.S. Treasury lien-holder, be exercised forcefully to effectuate resolution.

Any further delay not only jeopardizes the severely stressed world financial condition, but serves to encourage those seeking even further delay.

This is a matter which can now only be concluded at such time as the Royal Monarchical Power utilizes the power which has been granted; direct intervention is imperative.

Thank you very kindly in advance for your help; it is truly appreciated by many, and will have significant impact on the future financial health of the world.

Sincerely,

HODGES AND ASSOCIATES

[Signed]

A. CLIFTON HODGES

ACH/gm

Cc: Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II
Lindell H. Bonney, Sr.
Dana Wilcox
Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S.
President Barack Obama
Interpol, USNCB

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

OTHER EVIL DEVELOPMENTS, IN SUMMARY
Observe first that whenever these filthy Nazi snakes ‘pull’ a contrived abomination, the diversion, obfuscation, redirection and rank disinformation apparat in the background immediately disgorges one or more ‘explanations’.

Using third party websites which specialise in leveraging the potential for intensifying the fog of confusion and redirection, plus controlled ‘mainstream’ broadcast and press outlets, layer upon layer of further ‘explanations’ and speculation are piled on top of the early fabricated ‘explanations’, with the objective of ensuring that the truth of the sabotage is blotted out.

(1): The BP oil spill is of course a dreadful case in point. Evidence that this is a Cheney-orchestrated sabotage operation emerged right at the very start of the reporting with that information about criminal enterprise (see our earlier reports, passim) Halliburton’s dud cement component, and Halliburton’s purchase three months earlier of a clean-up firm. Transocean, the US owner and operator of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig, relocated to Zug, Switzerland, two years ago. Zug ‘just happens’ to be where Mark Rich operates. Mark Rich’s real name is Hans Brand, a long-range German Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD, Nazi strategic deception) operative.

The report that BP appraised The Obama Administration on 13th February 2010 that the Deepwater Horizon was leaking oil and natural gas onto the ocean floor, is accurate.

BP was fighting large cracks at the base of the well for roughly ten days in early February.

BP asked for the US Administration’s assistance long before the deadly accident. The Obama Administration was therefore fully cognisant of the situation (naturally, since Halliburton is one of its main ‘Black’ operations) a long time before the mysterious explosion in April.

• It follows, therefore, that the Terrorist Obama Administration is criminally implicated in this deliberately ‘permitted’ catastrophe.

The purpose of this operation has been (a) to divert attention from the illegal terrorist hijacking, blocking and stealing of the payout funds, in exactly the same way that 9/11 was used inter alia to destroy and annul the Cantor Fitzgerald contracts; and (b) to provide the Dark Actor Playing Games in the White House with scope for blaming the British. Why blame the British?

Because The Queen, with the Chinese, has not yielded to this criminality and is party to the $47 trillion lien on the Treasury that we originally announced effective around 6th December 2009; and because the approved Dollar Refunding Programme, which is to be operated because of the US intransigence from London, strikes at the very heart of the Fraudulent Finance carousel and, in the context of the Settlements, destroys the entire corrupt universe of fraudulent, illegal securitisation ‘assets’ (derivatives), thereby nullifying the secret power of the Octopus.

• See our ‘securitisation is illegal’ report.

The most senior and respected of Lady Thatcher’s former Ministers, Lord Young, was reported in The Times (19th June 2010) to be furious with President Obama.

Lord Young told the London newspaper:

‘His behaviour has been appalling. He sounds petulant and I do think he’s anti-British. It was symbolic that he sent back the bust of Winston Churchill that used to be in the White House. He let BP be the lightning conductor, not him’.

Cheney was admitted to the George Washington University hospital on Friday 25th June after complaining of feeling ill. He was expected to remain there over the weekend. Cheney has had five heart attacks in 32 years. He is also known on occasion to have suddenly entered hospital for hiding purposes when vulnerable to being ‘whacked’, only to be collected by his limo from a back door, on the risky and typically arrogant assumption that no-one would notice.

(2): The European leg of the long-range Nazi pan-German subversion and strategic deception operation in Europe, symbolised by the Euro, is indeed in severe jeopardy, as was predicted in International Currency Review in the 1990s, after the Maastricht Treaty, containing the same chapter headings as Europaische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft (European Economic Community), that Nazi compendium published in Berlin in 1942, was rammed though in 1992.

When the key insider operative George Soros decides that a ‘game’ is over, he’s using inside information, not just his supposed ‘guru’ abilities.

Soros was reported earlier in June to have told Die Zeit:

‘German policy is becoming a danger that could destroy the European project. A collapse of the Euro cannot now be excluded. Unless Germany changes policy, its withdrawal from the currency union would be helpful for the rest of Europe. At the moment Germany is pushing its neighbours into deflation; this threatens a long phase of stagnation, leading to nationalism, social unrest, and xenophobia. It endangers democracy’

Berlin, added George Soros, was treating the Maastricht Treaty as a ‘sacred text’ and was failing to understand that events had moved on. That would be typical of the Nazi mentality.

• Wir sind immer rechts. We are never wrong. If we are, we never acknowledge that we are wrong and we never will. Hitler never acknowledged his stupidity in invading the USSR either.

Not to be outdone, the President of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso, briefed trade union chiefs earlier in June, painting an ‘apocalyptic’ vision in which ‘crisis-hit countries in Southern Europe could fall victim to military coups or popular uprisings as interest rates soar and public services collapse because their governments run out of money’.

Of course when veteran private observers predict such eventualities, no-one takes much notice. But when members of the ‘Great and the Good’ [sic] finally come to recognise, decades later, the accuracy of such warnings, people sometimes sit up.

(3): Deutschemark requoted: BoersenNEWS, a large German stock market portal, has, since the second week of June 2010, reintroduced quotations in DEM, alongside EUR quotations.

BoersenNEWS explained: ‘Due to the ongoing Euro crisis, many investors expect the return of the Deutsche Mark. A recent survey showed that 39% of 1,364 boersennews.de users would like the good old Deutsche Mark reintroduced. BoersenNEWS has responded and therefore will immediately display share prices in Euro and Deutsche Mark… The Euro represents a cracked economic system, not only in the world, in Europe, but above all in Germany’.

It will be recalled that we have on several occasions reported that, during a press conference in 1998, Dr Hans Tietmeyer, then President of the Bundesbank, was asked whether, in view of the impending introduction of the Collective Currency (Euro), the Bundesbank had taken the obvious precaution to hoard a stock of Deutsche Marks, for rapid distribution in the event of the Euro failing and the Bundesbank having to take emergency action as a consequence.

Instead of pooh-poohing the question and the questioner, Dr Tietmeyer did not respond.

(4): In Memoriam and Horizontalisation News: Haaretz reported on 22nd June that Danny Barack, 48, CEO of the Israeli firm Leader Capital Markets, jumped to his death on the preceding afternoon from the 17th Floor of Platinum Tower, the office building housing the firm’s headquarters.

(5): Gordon Brown wrecked an antique Downing Street table:
The demons inside the former UK Prime Minister were revealed shortly after the Cameron team entered Downing Street on 11th May 2010. They were concerned to discover deep grooves in the antique mahogany table in a panelled, ground floor office.

So extensive was the damage that an enquiry was held into who, or what, could have caused such reckless destruction. A Downing Street source was reported in The Daily Telegraph on 13th June as explaining: ‘It became apparent that the marks were caused by his [Brown’s] manic scratchings. He was clearly writing very angrily with his pen and the marks came through the paper onto the table. Some are two or three inches long and very deep’.

Specialist cleaners have been unable to remove the marks despite frantic polishing. The gauged mahogony table will therefore remain unrepaired in Downing Street: an appropriate memorial to the most destructive Chancellor and Prime Minister in British history.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

MALICIOUS RUMOURS ABOUT THE QUEEN
Suggestions running riot among the more scurrilous, reckless and irresponsible dimensions of the Internet that Her Majesty The Queen will abdicate, are evil, gross malicious lies fed to the lemmings who specialise in magnifying the fabrications and confusion fed to them by the Bush-Clinton-CIA-DVD lie machine and who lack all discernment. The Queen will NOT abdicate the Throne: that is a definitive statement, and all those who are promulating this grotesque ‘Black’ lie are assisting the kleptocracy as it struggles for its continued existence in the face of the unprecedented squeeze it never anticipated, which is devouring the Octopus’s ‘Black’ power.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

THE FOLLOWING DATA HAS BEEN PUBLISHED AT THE FOOT
OF MOST OF THESE REPORTS FOR THE PAST THREE YEARS++:

• COMPILED BY U.S. SECURITIES EXPERT MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S..

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”.

Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge:
Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
NOTICES:

BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE.

In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest annual fee. This is done on-line in the usual way [direct with supplier].

BIDEN, GEITHNER, EMANUEL TAKING BUSH SR’S BRIBES

chrisstory

FORMAL C.I.A. ELIMINATION ORDER ISSUED AGAINST KEY SETTLEMENTS SIGNATORY

Tuesday 11 May 2010 19:00

ANNOUNCEMENT: 17 MAY 2010: INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW RELEASED WORLDWIDE
Outline details of this week’s release of International Currency Review are displayed in the second panel immediately below the NEWS panel on our Home Page. Also released are two further issues of Arab-Asian Affairs. Volume 33, # 5 of this title reveals how the Israeli authorities disguised the physical identity of David Kimche, the Israeli spymaster, drug controller and Director of the Israeli Foreign Office, even after his death, which took place on 8th March 2010.

• BIDEN, GEITHNER, EMANUEL TAKING BUSH BRIBES TO THWART PAYOUTS

• WAFFEN SS FRITZ KRAEMER HELD TOP U.S. N.S.C. POST

• BRIBES FOR BIDEN ET AL. ORDERED BY BUSH SR.

• OUR DEFRANCESCO EXPOSURE FORCES 24/7 BODYGUARD PROTECTION

• FORMAL C.I.A. ELIMINATION ORDER ISSUED AGAINST GOLD BADGE PAYOUTS SIGNATORY
UPDATE: Certain sensitive additional information which we cannot elaborate upon at this time indicates that the leaked promulgation by the CIA of an order to assassinate the US official in question was part of an elaborate Bushite ruse that provided dense cover for an immense heist
operation masterminded by the Bush-CIA deception experts. This operation was BLOWN with
the sudden ‘resignation’ of Gordon Brown and the consequent abrupt switch to the Cameron-Clegg partnership/Coalition arrangement. These developments coincided with certain critical matters that we can’t go into at this juncture (perhaps never), and which triggered these events.

In other words, the switch to Cameron-Clegg was connected to and driven by events behind the scenes which only very few know about, but which were and are of decisive importance.

We have left the segment dealing with the elimination order unchanged, as we are not in the habit of going back and changing what we said earlier, not least because this is the most transparent policy to adopt. But this update is inserted in order to signal to those ‘in the know’ that we are of course aware of what happened, and how it may have changed the course of history: literally.

• E.U. BAILOUT FINANCED BY $1.0 TRILLION DIVERTED FROM THE SETTLEMENTS FUNDS

• WHITE HOUSE CAMPAIGN TO SABOTAGE THE GOLD BADGE SIGNATORY’S PROGRESS

• RON PAUL: ‘YOU CAN’T BAIL OUT DEBT WITH DEBT’

• SEVERE PROBLEMS EMERGE ON THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE MARKETS

• ‘BUSHES SHOULD BE STRUNG UP IN PUBLIC LIKE SADDAM HUSSEIN’

• BUSH SR.’S U.S. AIR FORCE INTELLIGENCE HANDLER
IS ‘OCTOBER SURPRISE’ SR-71 PILOT GORDON SYMMONS

• FATAL MISCALCULATION BY WHITE HOUSE-C.I.A. DESPERADOS

• WORLD COURT ORDERED BREAKUP OF 19 U.S. CRIMINAL FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES

• FURTHER WAVES OF ARRESTS REPORTED:
CORRUPT PENTAGON’S CONSPICUOUS INACTIVITY

• CHENEY HALLIBURTON SCAMMING DETAILS SENT TO WAXMAN IN 2008

• GULF OIL RIG EXPLOSION: A ‘BLACK’ RETALIATION OPERATION AGAINST THE BRITISH

• OUR EXPOSURE OF THE HEMENWAY SHOOTING
LIFTED WITHOUT ATTRIBUTION, AND OUT OF CONTEXT

• WAS THIS ANOTHER C.I.A. ELIMINATION ORDER,
OR WAS THE SHOOTING ORDERED BY OBAMA (OR BOTH)?

• CITIBANK, ATHENS, WHERE WANTA SET UP BUSH ACCOUNTS,
BOMBED, THREE KILLED: NOT A COINCIDENCE

• ‘EUROPEAN CRISIS’ MADE IN WASHINGTON, D.C.

• EARLY BUSH II/MI-6 ATTEMPTS TO STOP OUR INVESTIGATIONS
USING GORDON THOMAS AS DUPLICITOUS INTERMEDIARY

• NOBODY WHO’S NOT IN NEED OF BRAIN SURGERY
WANTS TO BUY THE U.S. TREASURY’S ‘TRASHETS’ ANY LONGER

• U.S. TREASURY’S LIES AND SPIN EXPOSED BY
THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET’S DEBT STATISTICS

• IT’S NOT THE ECONOMY, STUPID: IT’S THE MATHEMATICS

• SOUND MECHANICS OF THE APPROVED PRIVATE SECTOR DOLLAR REFUNDING OPERATION

• UNATTRACTIVE OUTBREAK OF COORDINATED ‘BLANKFEINISM’

• S.E.C. CASE AGAINST GOLDMAN WALKS ROUND THE ELEPHANT IN THE BEDROOM

• SINCE ALL SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL, ALL DERIVATIVES
CONTRACTS ARE FRAUDULENT AND THEREFORE VOID

• PAUL VOLCKER DESTROYS HIS REPUTATION FOR INTEGRITY

• PUBLIC HAND-WRINGING BY ‘PUT-UPON’ BLANKFEIN

• BUSH II AND CLINTON CAUTION AGAINST GREED IN CHICAGO

• THE CHICAGO MAFIOSO FORK POINTED AT OBAMA

• ONGOING BLACKMAIL OPERATIONS TARGETING OBAMA TO PREVENT HIM SETTLING

• DOCUMENTS PROVE ROUTINE COLLABORATION BETWEEN C.I.A. AND ORGANISED CRIME

• EXPOSURES FORCING AMERICANS TO RECOGNISE THE PERILS OF C.I.A. CRIMINALITY

• MEANWHILE THE SINISTER ‘OFFICE OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH’ IS STILL IN THE WORKS

• POWERS TO TAKE DOWN ANY ENTITY ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD

• DESPERATE E.U. MEASURE TO ‘SAVE THE (PAN-GERMAN) EURO’
INCOMPATIBLE WITH SAVING THE FAILING SATRAP E.U. ‘MEMBER STATES’

• OPEN-ENDED E.U. LIABILITY POTENTIALLY IMPOSED
UPON BRITISH TAXPAYERS EVEN THOUGH BRITAIN IS BUST

• OUTGOING LABOUR GOVERNMENT CORRECTLY REFUSED TO GO ALONG

• OUTCOME OF THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION: TEMPORARY CHECK MATE

• GORDON BROWN RESIGNS: CAMERON GOES TO THE PALACE [11th May 2010]

• WELCOMING CAMERON, OBAMA PRAISES
THE ‘SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP’ HE TRASHED EARLIER

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

• AS PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED, OUR LANDLINES REMAIN CLOSED BECAUSE OF UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT. WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL OR THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY. Specifically we have closed down all our transatlantic voice communications using our landlines located in the New York office. This followed a 90-minute set-to that occurred on 6th May with a compartmentalised US intelligence organisation called Verizon. Years ago we ordered a 1-800 number so that North American subscribers and new order clients could call us without having to pay the transatlantic costs should we be handling calls in London. After our finding in March 2010 that the harassment calls were being directed via the 1-800 number in some cases, we took steps effective from 29th March to de-activate the landlines based in New York. We then waited to see whether we would be billed for any such calls after 29th March 2010.

The newest Verizon Bill, received late April in London, showed that we were continuing to be billed for the cost of these nuisance calls notwithstanding that the two land lines in New York had been disconnected. On 6th May we attempted to explain to uninterested Verizon personnel, including a so-called ‘Fraud Control’ Office, that since the land lines had been de-activated, it was a physical impossibility for any US calls to be relayed to London via our call forwarding facility in New York.

We therefore needed to know why were were continuing to be billed the cost of such transfers, given that the land lines had been de-activated. This proved to be way, way too complex for the operatives concerned to grasp. But what did emerge is that they could find no trace of our 1-800 number, which has been publicised on our website and in our literature and publications for many years. They then tried to deny that we own the 1-800 number in question, after we asked why we were not being billed for the facility. You would have thought they would have been interested in adding value to our monthly invoices. But no.

And why is this? Almost certainly because the 1-800 number was STOLEN FROM US at the outset by some cadre of criminalised US intelligence. The current position is that Verizon have started billing us FRAUDULENTLY for calls relayed via New York-based landlines received via the 1-800 number which they say they can find no trace of. We shall continue to press these issues until we extract the truth from this particular component of the criminalised US intelligence monstrosity.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

BIDEN, GEITHNER, EMANUEL TAKING BUSH BRIBES TO THWART PAYOUTS
It has transpired via special sources since we last reported that the following top US appointed officials are receiving weekly and monthly bribery cheques ordered by George H. W. Bush Sr. in a desperate ploy to ‘encourage’ them to maintain their sabotage against the Settlements payouts and to ‘encourage’ Bank of America to continue stealing the funds which have been allocated for the purpose, separated out and are ready to be paid:

• Vice President Joseph Biden. It is of course an IMPEACHABLE OFFENCE
for a Vice President of the United States to accept bribery payments.

• Rahm Emanuel, Obama’s White House Chief of Staff.

• Timothy Geithner, Secretary of the US Treasury. This fellow was originally picked by Dr Henry Kissinger, the notorious triple (DVD/STASI-KGB-Mossad) penetration controller, as a compliant, brainwashed US operative who could be relied upon to ensure the perpetuation of Fraudulent Finance derivatives operations based on illegal securitisation, both while serving as President of the Reserve Bank of New York (where Geithner accumulated a vast stash of derivatives estimated to have a notional value of $500 trillion, but probably much more), and when he was transferred seamlessly under Obama to the position of Treasury Secretary.

WAFFEN SS FRITZ KRAEMER HELD TOP U.S. N.S.C. POST
Now in the past we have pointed out that Dr Henry ‘Heinz’ Kissinger ‘filled in’ as the key North American agent of DVD (Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst) after Admiral Canaris (who was not hanged at Flossenburg in April 1945, as asserted by the Nazi disinformation legend), fell ill in 1974.

Kissinger then persuaded President Gerald Ford (a.k.a. Leslie Lynch King, pornographer) to sack William Colby as Director of Central Intelligence (CIA), and to replace him with the DVD’s primary representative, George H. W. Bush Sr. After Ronald Reagan had been elected President thanks to George H. W. Bush Sr.’s ‘Operation Surprise’ deception [see below], Bush Sr. considered that the Presidency should be his and therefore organised the assassination of Reagan, just as he had been involved many years earlier in implementing the assassination of President John Kennedy.

After George Bush Sr. had been elected to the Presidency in 1988, Senator John Tower sought appointment as Secretary of Defense, which would have destabilised the vast Fraudulent Finance operations and scamming that Bush Sr. intended to institutionalise within the Federal structures: so Mr Bush arranged for the CIA to issue a FORMAL ELIMINATION ORDER against Senator Tower, who duly died in a plane crash on 5th April 1991, along with his daughter and staffers.

Dr Kissinger ‘was’ ‘mentor’ to George H. W. Bush Sr., as to Timothy Geithner. And the ‘mentor’ of Kissinger was Dr Fritz Gustave Anton Kraemer, a special assistant, adviser and strategist serving the US Army Deputy Chief of Staff of Operations (DCSOPS) at the Pentagon. Kraemer, who was buried with full military honours in Arlington Cemetery some years ago, served on the US National Security Council (NSC), modelled after Hitler’s Security Council – with jurisdiction to oversee the Central Intelligence Agency under the National Security Act of 1947 (a.k.a. the ‘criminals’ charter’).

It is almost certain that this Fritz Kraemer, the top Secret Team operative in the United States, was Brigadeführer SS Fritz Kraemer, a very senior Waffen SS officer within the Hitler Nazi hierarchy, responsible for strategic Fascist atrocities during the Second World War.

Initially a war crimes defendant at Nuremberg, Brigadeführer Waffen SS Fritz Kraemer walked away from the Nuremberg trials into the service of the US military.

BRIBES FOR BIDEN ET AL. ORDERED BY BUSH SR.
The likely source of these remittances (although this has not been confirmed) is Deutsche Bank AG, by order of the corrupt Dr Joseph Ackermann, Deutsche Bank’s CEO, partner with the Three Racketeers, Mikhail Gorbachëv, George H. W. Bush Sr. and Dr Helmut Kohl, in Deutsche AG, formerly Barrington Investment Group, St Gallen, Switzerland.

The repeated ongoing bribery remittances are being paid to these corrupt office-holders on the instructions of George H. W. Bush Sr., backed by George W. Bush, who, with the Clintons and their criminal enterprise banking lackeys and Intelligence Power intermediaries, are desperate to hold on to the stolen funds and to prevent the loss of stranglehold control that they fear will ensue on payout and release of the hijacked and effectively diverted/stolen $6.2 trillion loan made available on 19th-20th June 2007 by the British Monarchical Power via the Bank of England to the criminal enterprise Bank of New York (Mellon) which diverted the funds on the instructions of Henry M. Paulson Jr., then US Secretary of the Treasury – who, along with Bush Jr., Clinton (male), and Blankfein (Goldman Sachs), is engaged (see below) ‘as we speak’ in an ongoing PR operation to convey the entirely false impression that he favours financial prudence, rectitude, discipline, integrity, honesty and all the other good things that he disregarded while holding high office.

OUR DEFRANCESCO EXPOSURE FORCES 24/7 BODYGUARD PROTECTION
Furthermore, as a direct consequence (according to a sworn and notarised Affidavit dated 31st March 2010 in this Editor’s possession) of our exposure in these reports of the Mafioso Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, whose name was inserted by the Pennsylvania Department of State Corporation Bureau as ‘Secretary’ of Mr Michael C. Cottrell’s firm Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., THE key US official (Gold Badge) Signatory responsible for and engaged in procuring the finalisation of the Settlements payments has, since that exposure, had to be equipped with bodyguards 24/7, and while present at the bank(s) responsible for the payments.

But it gets worse.

FORMAL C.I.A. ELIMINATION ORDER ISSUED AGAINST GOLD BADGE PAYOUTS SIGNATORY
On 7th May, this key US official was directly threatened on orders issued by the de facto Mafiosi George H. W. Bush Sr. and George Bush Jr.. At 10.45 pm UK time on 8th May, the Editor of this service was, in addition, FORMALLY advised that:

• The threat against the US Gold Badge referenced above (whose identity is known to this service) is an OFFICIAL C.I.A. ELIMINATION ORDER.

• Astonishingly, this intelligence has been leaked to us by a senior C.I.A. operative, also known (personally, in this instance) to this service.

What this means is that the Bush Crime Syndicate, which controls the Central Intelligence Agency, has reached a level of desperation so intense that it has resorted to an OFFICIAL, FORMAL C.I.A. ELIMINATION ORDER against the paymaster Gold Badge Signatory who’s in charge of procuring the necessary outcome, having evidently run out of other malicious options.

E.U. BAILOUT FINANCED BY $1.0 TRILLION DIVERTED FROM THE SETTLEMENTS FUNDS
Over Saturday and Sunday 8th-9th May 2010, the Gold Badge Signatory against whom the CIA has issued a formal elimination order (confirmed to us as stated above) entered into an arrangement with agents reporting ultimately to George H. W. Bush Sr. on the basis of some ‘deal’ or other, as a consequence of which $1.0 trillion was released from earmarked Settlement funds. This money was immediately sucked into the bowels of the Federal Reserve and has disappeared, although since the funds are resident within the central banking /Treasury systems, they can be traced.

The $1.0 trillion was diverted to help fund the purchase of US Government bonds to be deployed in the context of the European bailout operation cobbled together over the weekend.

Irrespective of what alternative explanations for this latest scam may emerge, The New York Times reported on 10th May as follows:

‘European Finance Ministers arrived in Brussels on Sunday with broad agreement on the need for a fiscal contribution from the European Union budget and some kind of fund to stabilize the most troubled markets. By several accounts in Europe, a 500 billion-Euro figure first emerged Sunday afternoon, when Mr Sarkozy called Mrs Merkel after each had spoken with Mr Obama’.

The New York Times then elaborated with convoluted explanations of what was finally agreed. But we need, in fact, go no further than where we stopped quoting the newspaper, above.

• Why on earth would it be necessary for Sarkozy and Merkel to speak to President Obama on a matter involving the raising of funds from European sources?

Answer: Because, contrary to the elaborate spin, the funds weren’t ever going to be raised from European sources (although duplicated ‘shadow’ arrangements implying such an accord, for cover purposes, may have been ‘agreed’) – given that Germany and France are routinely in the habit of deceiving their ‘fellow’ Europeans, especially the stupid British.

No. The funds were diverted from the Settlement resources, following a set-up mounted over the weekend, with the full knowledge and support of the Obama White House, working to instructions ultimately derived from the Bush apparat, against the Gold Badge Signatory named by the CIA as a formal target for elimination, as cited above.

Knowledge of this CIA elimination order, thought to have been gleaned by UK eavesdroppers from a conversation between the Editor of this service and an impeccably informed US source over the weekend, triggered highest-level British protests to the White House on Sunday, we understand. The British authority wished to know why a CIA death warrant had been issued against the Gold Badge Signatory who is equipped with full authority to procure the finalisation and distribution of the Settlements and Dollar Refunding monies.

(Answer: Because the Bush-DVD-CIA apparat has ordered the Obama White House to block the Settlements, of course. In this context we are told that Obama cannot stand the strain of the ‘Black’ forces preying on him and, given that he is blackmailable (see below), hasn’t got the strength or the guts to tell all concerned to cease and desist from these continuing sabotage operations).

WHITE HOUSE CAMPAIGN TO SABOTAGE THE GOLD BADGE SIGNATORY’S PROGRESS
On top of all this, we have been specifically informed that the same Gold Badge Signatory with the necessary Settlements authorities has been systematically sabotaged, diverted, undermined and otherwise gravely abused over the past few days, on orders from the Obama White House – which in turn now OPENLY acknowledges that it takes its orders from the Chicago Mafia and the George Bush-DVD component of the criminalised Intelligence Power, which serves the interests not of the United States and the American people, but of Germany and its twin, France.

Hence, in the above scenario, it was natural and routine for Merkel and Sarkozy to check with President Barack Obama just to make sure that the funds would be/had been diverted from the Settlements resources, so that the latest financial wheeze designed to delay the collapse of the German hegemony project, could be nailed into place, at least for public consumption purposes.

RON PAUL: ‘YOU CAN’T BAIL OUT DEBT WITH DEBT’
One Congressman who does understand the advanced form of madness driving the White House, the Treasury and the Federal Reserve, as they continue wilfully down the wrong path, is of course Representative Ron Paul, who points out that ‘you can’t bail out debt with debt’. No, as we have repeatedly explained, you can’t: but that is precisely what these desperate financial terrorists are doing, in order to keep their hot air balloon in the air and the carousel continuing by exploiting the collective stupidity of foreign central banks.

These include the Bank of Japan, the Bank of England, the Bundesbank, the Banque de France, the Swiss National Bank and the European Central Bank – which, for some unexplained reason, have not yet realised that the Federal Reserve is corrupt and compromised, and that the US authorities are following a course guaranteed to lead to financial and economic catastrophe.

A system effectively of 90-day repos has been arranged whereby these dumb central banks will be printing their own currencies, and stuffing them to the Federal Reserve on behalf of the Treasury, in exchange for Treasuries. But Treasuries are completely worthless: as indicated below, nobody in the marketplace who’s not in need of brain surgery wants US Treasuries these days.

So the crazed US authorities are using up the only undeserved residual source of goodwill they have left – the rather ‘thick’ central banking community. Foreign central bankers need to wake up and come to their senses. By accommodating the US authorities via these exotic operations, the foreign central banks, including the Bank of England which has been repeatedly ripped off by these sheisters, are merely buying more time for the desperate clique in charge of America’s progressive financial and economic destruction, to complete the collapsing of the system.

The right thing to do when confronted with bandits in your front room is to order them out of the room, or to shoot them dead. You hardly invite them to sit down and have a nice cup of tea and cake. The central banks that are accommodating the American official financial criminalists are choosing the easy option: which means that all they are doing is stacking up worse trouble for the future, and guaranteeing that when the US financial balloon explodes, all the subsidiary financial balloons held aloft by these myopic central bankers will explode in tandem.

SEVERE PROBLEMS EMERGE ON THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE MARKETS
There’s also severe trouble on the foreign exchange markets. New York dealers are complaining that only spot forex trades are being handled, because foreign exchange dealers can no longer trust counterparty banks to honour spreads agreed-upon at the time of the transaction.

And with the Federal Reserve arrogating to itself effectively the rôle of the world’s primary foreign exchange centre, as well as the rôle of rediscounter for the central banks, the emerging state of affairs is that the most unsound, decadent, corrupt and failing central banking system in the world believes that it can remain in business sine die by means of these artificial arrangements involving the creation of new debt for old.

Since the named central banks evidently believe that this is possible, they deserve what is coming to them. As for the Bank of England, which knows all about the private sector US Dollar Refunding operation to be conducted out of London (as has been reconfirmed to us on 11th May, by the way), it appears to be no better than Merkel and Sarkozy.

Like elements of MI-6, it is evidently sabotaging the British Monarchical Power. There has always been a serious problem inside the Bank of England: and you’ve only got to observe the lugubrious physiognomy of Mr (still not even knighted) Mervyn King, the Bank Governor, to recognise that this must indeed be the case. Otherwise he’d smile occasionally. But he never does.

‘BUSHES SHOULD BE STRUNG UP IN PUBLIC LIKE SADDAM HUSSEIN’
Reverting to the CIA’s order to assassinate the Gold Badge Signatory authority, it was explained to us on the transatlantic phone between 10.45 p.m. and 11.00 p.m. on Saturday 8th May 2010 that this desperate criminal CIA order reflects the demands of George H. W. Bush Sr. and George W. Bush Jr., whose selfish interests are directly opposed to those of the United States, the American people and the Rest of the World, and that:

• George H. W. Bush Sr. should be arrested as a terrorist and should be made to suffer the same fate before TV cameras as Saddam Hussein, to prevent the further irreparable damage that he is knowingly inflicting on the whole world, and that:

• George W. Bush Jr. should likewise be arrested as a terrorist and should be made to suffer the same fate before TV cameras as Saddam Hussein, to prevent the further irreparable damage that he is knowingly inflicting on the whole world.

This fate should, our transatlantic correspondent explained, be fulfilled in front of the TV cameras so that everyone holding or seeking official positions in the United States is compelled belatedly to understand that public service involves exclusively service to the people of the United States, and not opportunities for personal enrichment.

George Bush Sr.’s possibly prophetic observation, indicative of his innermost fears, that ‘if the American people knew what we’d done, they’d string us up from lamp posts’, may yet be realised.

BUSH SR.’S U.S. AIR FORCE INTELLIGENCE HANDLER
IS ‘OCTOBER SURPRISE’ SR-71 PILOT GORDON SYMMONS
These Fascist criminals are intellectually impaired, just like Mussolini. The reoffending criminal mentality is, by definition, stunted. We are informed that George Bush Sr. is being handled these days by the very same SR-71 stealth plane pilot (US Air Force Intelligence) who flew him to Paris for the ‘October Surprise’ coup designed to deprive Jimmy Carter of re-election, in favour of Ronald Reagan, whom George Bush Sr. soon took steps to try to have assassinated (an operation that was botched), so that he himself could take over as President.

It is this US Naval Intelligence operative, Gordon Symmons, resident in Chesapeake, VA, who is telling Bush Sr. and Jr. what to do, and how to respond to the unprecedented pressures being applied against the Bush Crime apparat and its CIA-DVD satrap community – advising them on how to resist all pressures, come what may, even if this means destroying the entire global financial economy, so that they can keep what they have stolen.

This traitor Symmons is, we understand, the ONLY technician-adviser left serving the nefarious, discredited and loathed serial criminal, George H. W. Bush Sr. Recall that, as we have reported, the heinous ‘Black’ fabrication and disinformation operative Thomas Heneghan’s handler is the US Air Force Intelligence convicted securities fraudster Otis C. Johnston (1). The reason for the central rôle of US Air Force Intelligence is that it is this rogue component of the hideously dangerous, out-of-control US Intelligence Power that controls the United States’ nuclear weapons.

FATAL MISCALCULATION BY WHITE HOUSE-C.I.A. DESPERADOS
This formal CIA elimination order and threat against the Signatory Gold Badge turns out to be a fatal miscalculation – not least because given this posting, the information is now in the public domain. The standard response procedure with the intelligence we publish is as follows:

• The controlled, flaky diversionary fabrication and disinformation websites typically pick up a peripheral point while ignoring the critical information contained in the report; and:

• Because of several successful early operations by MI-6 against the Editor of this service, using that two-faced veteran UK journalist Gordon Thomas as intermediary, the British media, being gullible and ‘unaware’ of dirty tricks, were persuaded to pay no attention to what we publish. The purpose of those operations, involving direct lies about the Editor (which took place back in 2004 and 2005), and a set-up, was to ensure that the British media would disregard the biggest financial corruption exposure reportage operation in world history – as a result of which the ‘mainstream’ has been floundering and barking up the wrong trees ever since.

Nevertheless, we have, as a direct consequence of the miscalculations of Mr Wanta who, in pursuit of his own and Bush Sr.’s objectives, magnified our platform via the French intelligence electronic distribution network in 2006-2007, managed to perform an ‘end-run’ around the sleepy ‘mainstream’ media – despite the 37 threats (of which seven were death threats) received by the Editor of this service in the course of this investigation (over the period 2002-2010).

Now we have hard intelligence that the US Gold Badge official Signatory, who serves the United States, but also has to work with elements of British intelligence as well, is at the receiving end of an OFFICIAL C.I.A. ELIMINATION ORDER, the purpose being to sabotage the Settlements payouts process by killing the holder of the crucial necessary signatory powers.

WORLD COURT ORDERED BREAKUP OF 19 U.S. CRIMINAL FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES
All this is taking place against the background of the fact that about two weeks ago (we now learn), a World Court order was obtained demanding the break-up (i.e., dissolution) of 19 American banks, under the Lien powers held by the Lien holders – which order the banks are defying, just as Bank of America is defying its legal responsibility to disgorge the funds which are ready for disbursal and must be paid out. Transatlantic tensions over this are at the explosion stage.

FURTHER WAVES OF ARRESTS REPORTED:
CORRUPT PENTAGON’S CONSPICUOUS INACTIVITY
Moreover this has remained the case DESPITE further waves of arrests, on top of the previously reported 30 or so arrests which took place in late April, which have been reported to us and were reconfirmed on 7th May 2010. In other words, when you yank a dozen snakes out of the snakepit, a dozen more take their place.

This raises the issue: what is the Pentagon doing about this – admittedly, a pointless question, in view of the control exercised over the Bushsnakes by US Air Force Intelligence operative Gordon Symmons? The US military can, at the drop of a helmet, surround the banks, procure compliance at the barrels of guns with the absolute requirements of the Pay Orders and presumably also of the Basel List including the Line Item covering the Refunding Loan payment – the only problem being that it is presided over by a former CIA Director of Central Intelligence.

But even Mr Gates, having seen his department scammed and ransacked by Halliburton [see the preceding report, on which NONE of the diversionary US websites sponsored by the controlling Intelligence Power have commented, of course], must by now realise that there is no future for the United States if the criminalist behaviour of the Intelligence Power that he fronted in the past is allowed to persist. So is this man the complicit, compromised and controlled wimp he seems?

CHENEY HALLIBURTON SCAMMING DETAILS SENT TO WAXMAN IN 2008
Concerning our Halliburton re-exposure (2), it is to be noted that, as stated in our original report dated 26th May 2008, the information in question was leaked after it had earlier been made available to Congressman Waxman. Which sheds an interesting light, does it not, on the demands made upon Halliburton by Mr Waxman’s Committee, set out in his letter dated 30th April 2010 concerning the cementing operations conducted on the British Petroleum Oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico prior to the blow-out (which we reproduce again as Note (3) below). Given this connection, we prefer to rely on Mr Waxman’s detailed knowledge of the dual scamming operation by Halliburton within the CIA and the Pentagon as the source of his Committee’s obvious immediate suspicions concerning the rôle of Halliburton in the perpetration of this latest abomination.

Of course, Mr Waxman has a severe problem here, as well. Given the devastating corruption exposed in our reiterated Halliburton scamming report, what did he do with this information in 2008? Logic would suggest that it was his Committee which will have made the grotesque, officially condoned scamming information available to a Grand Jury which, we understand, has considered this scandal. But has the information gone nowhere and been sealed, in order to protect Cheney, the Box Gang and the corrupt Intelligence Power of which Halliburton is itself an outgrowth?

GULF OIL RIG EXPLOSION: A ‘BLACK’ RETALIATION OPERATION AGAINST THE BRITISH
Only ten days prior to the blowout, Halliburton conveniently snapped up a giant marine firefighting corporation for $250.00 million. Persistent suggestions that Goldman Sachs shorted Transocean immediately ahead of the blow-out refuse to be erased from the record, although we removed our initial reference to this pending further research. Most tellingly of all, as always occurs after these atrocities, the stories keep a-changing. There was no Deadman switch. Now, all of a sudden, it is reported that there WAS a Deadman blowout preventer. And to rub in BP’s humiliation, corporation executives are now reported to have been on board at a party to celebrate BP’s safety record, and the first explosion occurred in the room next to where the party was being held. This would have been known days ago, one would have thought.

Given former US criminal Vice President Richard B. Cheney’s integration with Halliburton, what are the odds that this was indeed a malicious sabotage operation against this prime British asset by the infuriated and utterly desperate Bush-CIA Crime apparat, in the face of the intense pressure that is continuing to be exerted on the Octopus by the British Monarchical Power? Clearly, they must be rated as exceptionally high. In this connection, given the extent of our partial knowledge of what is taking place behind the scenes in the context alluded to herein, all other ‘explanations’ for the blowout can be seen to serve the usual obfuscation and diversion objectives.

After all, the standard ‘Black’ counterintelligence procedure after each abomination has been perpetrated, is to seek to befuddle and bamboozle the necessarily confused general public with contradictory, conflicting, unprovenanced, anonymous, spoof, partial, inconsequential, fabricated and often deliberately provocative website lies and sequences, in order to ensure that gullible people run after the sterile red herrings served up for that purpose, so that the crucial facts that have been revealed are bypassed and ignored. As we have frequently pointed out, this is a far more sophisticated modus operandi than that applied by Dr Joseph Goebbels, whose method(replicated by the Soviets) was to repeat a single lie so relentlessly that it morphed into ‘the truth’.

With the abuse by malevolent counterintelligence of modern electronic communications, you get untutored people who can’t distinguish between opinion and fact to do your dirty work for you: hence the invention of that diabolical cesspit called ‘the Blog’.

OUR EXPOSURE OF THE HEMENWAY SHOOTING
LIFTED WITHOUT ATTRIBUTION, AND OUT OF CONTEXT
A recent case in point was the irresponsible posting, WITHOUT ATTRIBUTION and completely out of context, by www.freerupublic.com, of our originating briefing report on the assassination of the youngest son of lawyer John Hemenway, who brought a Quo Warranto action against President Obama. John Hemenway Jr., 47, was shot dead in Bedford, VA; and as you must surely be aware, by definition, any atrocity that takes place in Virginia, home of the criminalised US Intelligence Power, is always especially suspect.

Our text having been lifted without attribution, the abomination was then elaborated by people (via that wayward website’s attached ‘Blog’) with absolutely no knowledge of the situation, divesting themselves of knee-jerk reactions to a state of affairs of the utmost gravity, as evidenced by the following circumstances:

• President Obama ‘joked’ about his missing birth certificate at an event for the ‘mainstream’ press on the self-same day as the shooting.

• After we had been informed that an autopsy was taking place, the body of John Hemenway Jr. was cremated the day after he was shot.

• A strange blanket of silence descended on the matter after our initial report, and as far as we can gather, no report about the shooting appeared in any so-called ‘mainstream’ outlet.

• Our impeccable US source informed the Editor on 3rd May: ‘I personally know that John (Jr.) would never commit suicide for any reason, and it’s strange that nobody knows what happened…. I don’t think his family will ever be able to find out what happened to him, and the authorities haven’t disclosed anything which could be helpful to the family’.

Meanwhile John Hemenway Sr., aged 84, bears the burden not only of the Quo Warranto lawsuit against Obama but also of the sudden loss, by an ‘unexplained shooting’ in Bedford, VA, of his youngest son of the same name.

The Memorial took place on 4th May, as we have reported, and we repeat the text of the Memorial as Note (4) below, just in case anybody dares to doubt what we have stated.

WAS THIS ANOTHER C.I.A. ELIMINATION ORDER,
OR WAS THE SHOOTING ORDERED BY OBAMA (OR BOTH)?
Knowing the depths of depravity to which the serpents that we are having to expose routinely descend, it is far from unlikely that the Presidential ‘joke’ referenced above, which the gullible and increasingly discredited US ‘mainstream’ media representatives thought was funny, represented a ‘Black’ act of ‘in-your-face’ defiance by Mr Obama over the legitimacy issue; and if that obvious deduction is correct, then of course the President of the United States, with his known Mafioso links (see below), knew all about the hit, didn’t he?

Which leaves the unresolved issue of why the body was cremated almost immediately after we were told that an autopsy was taking place. This kind of thing only happens when a dirty deed has to be covered up. The suggestion from one of our sources is that John Hemenway Jr.’s wife ordered the immediate cremation: but given the known sunny character of the late Mr Hemenway Jr., a patent attorney described by our main informant as ‘a very kind soul’, none of this ‘stacks’.

As a consequence of which, we entertain the very gravest suspicion about this murder – namely that it was ordered or sanctioned by the President of the United States: or that it was another FORMAL C.I.A. ELIMINATION ORDER. Which amounts to the same thing.

CITIBANK, ATHENS, WHERE WANTA SET UP BUSH ACCOUNTS,
BOMBED, THREE KILLED: NOT A COINCIDENCE
Meanwhile, amid the revolutionary disintegration in Athens recently, it has not passed unnoticed that it was Citibank, in Athens, that was bombed, and where three bankers were killed. It will be recalled that we have repeatedly noted the rôle of Citibank, Athens, as the counterparty holder of a vast stash of worthless derivatives exchanged by complicit Greek personnel for Euros, in trading collaboration with agents of the Bush Financial Crime apparat. And where, inter alia, did the felon, serial fraudster and Bush Sr. courier-lackey, Leo/Lee Wanta, open accounts on behalf of his boss, George Bush Sr.? Why, with Citibank, Athens.

And it was the serial fraudster and felon Leo/Lee Wanta – who deceived the Editor of this service and exploited our publicity platform for 18 months, while scamming him of his $35,000 loan – and who, having established the Ionian Bank in Cyprus on behalf of Bush Sr., worked with the Italian-based CIA counterpart operative, Marco Saba, effectively preparing the bankrupting of Greece.

‘EUROPEAN CRISIS’ MADE IN WASHINGTON, D.C.
So, as you can see, the ‘European crisis’ is directly connected to, and a specific consequence of, the Fraudulent Finance operations mounted by the Bush/CIA/DVD criminal apparat that we alone have been burdened with exposing, and which the so-called ‘mainstream’ media have sidestepped and ignored – thanks, in the case of the British press, to its stupidity in paying any attention to the malicious early operations of MI-6 perpetrated against the Editor of this service, whose job is to go behind the financial news to bring our subscribers intelligence not reflected in the ‘mainstream’.

• In the case of The Daily Telegraph, for which the Editor used to contribute extensive op-ed articles in the 1970s and 1980s, the false witness lies about the Editor were almost certainly fed in by the veteran journalist Gordon Thomas, who writes articles for the newspaper to this day.

EARLY BUSH II/MI-6 ATTEMPTS TO STOP OUR INVESTIGATIONS
USING GORDON THOMAS AS DUPLICITOUS INTERMEDIARY
In late 2004, Gordon Thomas informed the Editor that after George W. Bush was ‘re-elected’ that November, US official sources asked MI-6: ‘What are you going to do about Mr Story?’

MI-6 then responded by mounting an entrapment operation exploiting the fact that the Editor had unfortunately not realised that American Free Press, which had commissioned an article by him, was in fact the phoenix version of the notorious Spotlight publication, run by an anti-Semitic CIA cadre out of an office in lower Pennsylvania Avenue. The simple set-up technique, in which the CIA cadre running the operation directly participated, was to arrange for a Telegraph journalist to call up the Pennsylvania Avenue office during the period when the Editor was in that office (in order to collect a cheque which of course the CIA cadre had failed to pay).

• That conveyed to the Daily Telegraph journalist the false impression that the Editor is anti-Semitic, the object of the discrediting ploy.

MI-6 also disseminated lies to the British media about the Editor’s alleged involvement with Mark Thatcher in connection with the Equatorial Guinea fiasco, and with the dirty drug-dealer and Blair supporter Bernie Ecclestone, in connection with some scamming operation out of Monaco. Gordon Thomas was directly involved as ‘Black’ intermediary in the promulgation to the Editor of these lies, which he said had been disseminated ‘in order to make you sit up’.

• The Editor responded by redoubling his efforts to find out in much greater detail what MI-6 and the Bush II régime were attempting to cover up: hence this investigation and these reports.

The Editor’s personal experience, confirmed by others, is that everyone who ventures to expose these serpents is liable to find himself at the receiving end of malicious lies, false witness, and usually attempts at a set-up. We were set up and exploited by Mr Wanta, and when we severed relations with that snake, the Editor thought that a million emails would arrive from clever-clogs lambasting him with ‘told you so’ messages.

In actual fact, we didn’t receive ONE SINGLE COMMUNICATION to that effect. When the Editor repeatedly asked knowledgeable US sources why this was so, the tired response was this:

‘Wanta is the world’s most accomplished deceiver and liar. He’s deceived everybody. So your experience isn’t even interesting’.

• When MI-6 considered that they had deceived the ‘mainstream’ media by bearing false witness against the Editor of this service, they were able to inform their criminal colleagues in the Bush II Administration that they had successfully ‘handled’ the situation, which turned out to be inaccurate.

NOBODY WHO’S NOT IN NEED OF BRAIN SURGERY
WANTS TO BUY THE U.S. TREASURY’S ‘TRASHETS’ ANY LONGER
On 5th May, the Financial Times reported from New York that the US Treasury had announced the first reduction in US Government debt sales since 2007, reflecting ‘improving economic growth’ which was ‘buoying tax receipts’. The official spin, absorbed lock stock and barrel by the British financial newspaper, was that given an economic turnround, the US Treasury didn’t need to sell as much debt as it needed to previously. Quarterly debt sales due in the week beginning on 10th May would be reduced by $3.0 billion, to $78 billion, compared with the February refunding.

U.S. TREASURY’S LIES AND SPIN EXPOSED BY
THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET’S DEBT STATISTICS
However if we look at the US Office of Management and Budget’s statistics (notwithstanding their notorious unreliability), we find that the Statutory Debt Limit was raised to $6.4 trillion on 28th June 2002, and to $10.6 trillion on 30th July 2008. On 17th February 2009, in parallel with Mr Obama’s first Budget, the Statutory Debt Limit was increased from $11.3 trillion (effective from 3rd October 2008) to $12.4 trillion for the rest of Fiscal Year 2009.

• The estimated figure to which the Statutory Debt Limit will need to be raised in Fiscal Year 2010 is $13.8 trillion, rising to an estimated $19.7 trillion by Fiscal Year 2015.

If we review another OMB series, we find that what the official budgetologists refer to as ‘Gross Federal Debt’, at $9,986,082 billion, is offset by ‘Debt Held by Government Accounts of $4,183,032 billion, falsely implying that the actual indebtedness of the Federal Government at the end of the 2008 Fiscal Year was $5,803,050. However as we have repeatedly explained both here and in our International Currency Review, ‘Debt Held by Government Accounts’ represents the mandatory entitlement obligations of the Federal Government.

This ‘smoke and mirrors’ arrangement hides the enormity of the Government’s true indebtedness (on the basis of the OMB’s official data, which are the only data available, even though they are largely nonsense), under a statutory requirement whereby the surpluses accrued in the so-called Budget ‘Trust Funds’ are ‘invested’ in the ‘Federal Funds’ accounts (current expenditure) – which means that these earmarked surpluses have all been squandered. But the future obligations which the surpluses existed to fund, remain unchanged.

Therefore, instead of being subtracted from the ‘Gross Federal Debt’ data, these amounts (which are referenced by OMB as ‘Debt Held by Government Accounts’) have to be ADDED BACK TO the Gross Federal Debt data. With this necessary adjustment, the ‘Adjusted Federal Debt’ using these numbers amounted to $14,169,114 billion at the end of Fiscal Year 2008. On the same calculations, the ‘Adjusted Federal Debt’ aggregates $18,275,577 billion by the end of Fiscal Year 2010 (30th September 2010), reaching $19,789,733 billion by 30th September 2011 and $25,378,196 billion by 30th September 2015. And, as indicated, these calculations use the OMB’s unreliable statistics.

Just how unreliable they are is now openly acknowledged by the Office of Management and Budget itself, which has XXXXXXXXXed out the later numbers because the OMB seeks to avoid excessive condemnation for misleading the public (which it has in fact been doing at least since President Carter’s time, but never mind). If you press an XXXXXXXXXed line, a number will appear at the top indicating what is hidden. Presumably the idea here is to convey to the fleeting observer that the OMB is hedging its bets, but the ‘experts’ can discover what is being covered up by pressing the hidden number (on the OMB’s website).

There is no difference between these presentations and the fake numbers we used to have to grapple with under overt Communism, when analysts were confronted with the impossible task of making sense of the falsified statistics promulgated by Comecon. For good measure, the OMB’s published budget deficit data, which entail known falsifications, are worth adding here. According to these data, the United States’ published Federal budget deficit for Fiscal Year 2008 was $458,555 billion. The figure for Fiscal Year 2009 rose to $1,412,686 billion, and the OMB’s official projection for Fiscal Year 2010 is $1,555,582 billion.

There is no way that these data can possibly be reconciled with the US Treasury’s 5th May 2010 announcement, heavily spun by ‘Hill and Knowlton’, that it is now possible to reduce quarterly debt sales at all – sales, that is, of debt to GENUINE PURCHASERS. But in order to disguise the reality – that it cannot sell Treasuries into the gullible financial markets as of old, so it has been ‘selling’ Treasuries to the Federal Reserve (and probably to its own accounts) instead – the US Treasury is representing that ‘things are improving’, which will alleviate the pressure to sell more debt.

IT’S NOT THE ECONOMY, STUPID: IT’S THE MATHEMATICS
Unfortunately for the Treasury’s spin-meisters, not everyone is quite as gullible as the financial market gurus so eagerly sought out by ‘mainstream’ financial journalists, as they seek to pad out their dreary reports on such subjects. For it is neither here nor there HOW MUCH THE ECONOMY IMPROVES, even if it IS improving: and who knows, given official, Comecon-style manipulation of the macroeconomic data as well?

It is not variations in economic activity and the consequent increase or decrease in the tax take which are the pertinent factors here. It is the RELENTLESS LOGIC OF THE UNDERLYING DEBT MATHEMATICS, some detail of which we have demonstrated above (albeit having had to use the OMB’s intrinsically unreliable numbers).

What this means is that even if the US economy were to grow at Chinese rates, the TREND of the underlying US debt mathematics would not change for many, many years. Such growth rates would indeed fill gaps and would alleviate the need for the Treasury to issue debt on the permissive scale to which it had become accustomed. But the logic of the mathematics would not be changed: the pace of the deterioration would be reduced, and no time horizon that makes sense could be relied upon to pinpoint the ‘magic’ moment when debt accumulation stalls, and moves into reverse.

Of course there is no prospect of the US economy (now that it’s so irrevocably Third World in so many respects) ever growing at such rates: so further consideration of this model would be futile.

Which reveals what REALLY underlies this PR statement carried in the Financial Times on 5th May: The US Treasury cannot issue Treasuries to marketplace buyers on any meaningful scale, which means that its Treasuries issuance fest has collapsed, as we predicted would happen: all it can do is to issue paper to the Federal Reserve.

And lo! When we review the Office of Management and Budget’s data on this score, we find that the column headed ‘Debt Held by the Public’ is XXXXXXXXXed right the way back to 1983. This was emphatically NOT the case when we last examined these data several months ago.

Within the category ‘the Public’, resides the Federal Reserve itself, as the Fed is a private sector institution. Now the OMB numbers reflecting official debt held by the Federal Reserve ‘remain intact’ (i.e., have not been XXXXXXXXXed). Which means, does it not, that the adjacent column obfuscates the situation: otherwise the OMB would surely not have considered it necessary to XXXXXXXXX these data right back to 1983.

SOUND MECHANICS OF THE APPROVED PRIVATE SECTOR DOLLAR REFUNDING OPERATION
As you know, all this gross deception could have been avoided had the loan made available by the British Monarchical Power on 19th-20th June 2007 via the Bank of England not been hijacked and diverted by Bank of New York (Mellon) on the instructions of then US Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr., the former CEO of Goldman Sachs, which is the subject of the SEC’s devastating Civil Complaint [see text in our report dated 18th April 2010].

Those loan funds were intended for the Dollar Refunding operation agreed to by the Group of Seven Financial Powers in both 2006 and 2007, and urged by Her Majesty the Queen ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’. Since it would appear that, even at this late stage, observers have simply not understood what all this is about, we re-explain it in this segment.

The US Treasury’s decadent intention, held together by the Bush bribes accepted by Geithner, Biden and Emanuel (see above), has been not only to retain the $6.2 trillion loan (i.e. to STEAL the loan funds in perpetuity), but to retain control over the Refunding by performing it below the radar internally – and pulling the wool, as always, over the eyes of the gullible financial markets (Market participants and analysts think they are exceedingly clever at all times, but usually nit-pick around ephemeral data and information, failing to see the density of the wood behind the trees). So here’s an elementary lesson in economic accounting, applicable to the Refunding:

(1): If the Government does the refunding (e.g., by issuing exotic instruments and engaging in ‘creative’ trading with counterparties with incredible rates of return), the accounting position is that the other side of the balance sheet accumulates MORE DEBT to offset the instruments issued.

• Furthermore, as in this context the Government cannot tax itself, NO MEANINGFUL REAL TAX REVENUES ACCRUE ON-BALANCE SHEET to the Treasury, which is the object of the exercise.

(2): By contrast, as the $6.2 trillion sovereign fund is a LOAN, to be used exclusively in the PRIVATE SECTOR (NOT within the Government sector, below the radar where it is open to ongoing abuse) the following entirely opposite accounting situation applies:

• The transparent, taxable securities transactions conducted in the private sector Dollar Refunding operation generate ON-BALANCE SHEET TAX REVENUES payable directly to the Treasury ON-BALANCE SHEET, thereby immediately amortising accumulated ‘background’ debt.

• The other side of the balance sheet to these transactions is the LOAN FUND.

Is it really necessary to acquire First Class degrees in accounting and economics in order to UNDERSTAND that THIS is THE SOLUTION, and THE ONLY SOLUTION?

And is it not a fact that the persistent opposition to this G-7-approved solution by the Bush II and Obama White House, and by the Paulson and Geithner Treasury, represents not merely grotesque dereliction of the incumbents’ duties to serve the interests of the American people and the United States to the absolute exclusion of all other considerations, but also entitles these highest-level operatives to be arrested for TREASON AGAINST THE UNITED STATES?

UNATTRACTIVE OUTBREAK OF COORDINATED ‘BLANKFEINISM’
Meanwhile some of the most egregious perpetrators and financial criminals have been practicising in the mirror of late to perfect their expertise in the art of Leninist ‘contradictions’ – a.k.a. speaking out of the left-hand side of their mouths as though no-one had noticed that their actions have all along diverged from their verbal assertions.

First, the former US Treasury Secretary, Henry M. Paulson Jr., the man who ordered the $6.2 trillion sovereign loan fund to be hijacked, diverted and effectively stolen in 2007 [see above], appeared before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission on 6th May to ‘caution’ that all investment banking transactions must be done ‘with the highest standards of fair dealing’.

Observe how this criminal financier and operative made his point: he told the Commission that such transactions ‘must’ conform to high standards, which is not the same thing as acknowledging that Goldman Sachs and the other Fraudulent Finance specialist houses have been engaged in implementing ‘the highest standards of fair dealing’ or are currently so engaged.

In other words, Paulson said nothing at all. He just made a statement to which no objection could be taken and which bore no relationship at all to the routine Fraudulent Finance operations over which he presided as Treasury Secretary and as CEO at Goldman Sachs.

Moreover, like all these criminal financiers, Paulson skated over the fact that under US law, and in all Common Law countries, securitisation is absolutely illegal [see our report dated 18th April 2010]. For Paulson, there was never any problem with securitisation – which, being translated, means that Paulson remains content, to this day, that the Rule of Law should continue to be trampled on, which as we have so extensively exposed, is in any case his normal modus operandi.

S.E.C. CASE AGAINST GOLDMAN WALKS ROUND THE ELEPHANT IN THE BEDROOM
Of course, as we have pointed out, the very Civil Case brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC] itself against Goldman Sachs [see report, 18th April 2010] addresses alleged fraudulent behaviour by Goldman Sachs but EVADES the broader reality that securitisation is illegal. In other words, the SEC’s case against Goldman Sachs addresses fraudulent operations conducted by the institution within the overall context of illegality. The SEC could perfectly well, in theory, round on all these corrupt speculating Fraudulent Finance institutions on the ground that they have been engaged in marketing fraudulent securities, beginning with the central reality that if the original mortgagor (in the case of mortgage-backed securities (MBS)) had not knowingly given his or her specific written consent to the assignment of the asset, then all derivative transactions have been and are NULL AND VOID.

SINCE ALL SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL, ALL DERIVATIVES
CONTRACTS ARE FRAUDULENT AND THEREFORE VOID
As previously noted, this is the gigantic elephant in the bedroom. Because what this means is that 100% of derivatives transactions, past and ongoing, are fraudulent; and where a contract is entered into to facilitate fraud, it is automatically voided. So, like former US Treasury Secretary Paulson, the SEC is itself co-conspiring in the perpetuation of the fabrication that securitisation is legal, which is not the case. We explained all this in excruciating detail in International Currency Review, Volume 34, Number 2, the theme of which was ‘The Legalisation of Financial Corruption’.

In fact, the ‘legalisation’ implied is illusory: what has happened is that ‘because everyone was doing it’, the immense breach of the law that this criminal behaviour entailed was simply ‘legalised’ by the authorities turning a blind eye to what was going on – something that came easily, as so many high-level officials were enriching themselves in the process.

PAUL VOLCKER DESTROYS HIS REPUTATION FOR INTEGRITY
On the same date (6th May 2010), the former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, Paul Volcker, now Chairman of President Obama’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board, unilaterally destroyed his reputation for integrity by writing a letter to Senators stating that ‘The provision of derivatives by commercial banks to their customers in the usual course of a banking relationship should not be prohibited’. In other words, Volcker agrees with Paulson that the Rule of Law should continue to be disregarded by the banks, thereby destroying his repuation for integrity.

Mr Volcker’s letter, sent from his Fifth Avenue, New York City, apartment, read as follows:

May 6, 2010

Dear Mr Chairman [Senator Dodd]

A number of people, including some members of your Committee, have asked me about the proposed restrictions on bank trading in derivatives as set out in Senator Lincoln’s proposed amendment to Section 716 of S. 3217. I thought it best to write to you directly about my reaction.

I well understand the concerns that have motivated Senator Lincoln in terms of the risks and potential conflicts posed by proprietary trading in derivatives concentrated in a limited number of commercial banking organizations. As you know, the proposed restrictions appear to go well beyond the proscriptions on proprietary trading by banks that are incorporated in Section 619 of the reform legislation that you have proposed. My understanding is that the prohibitions already provided for in Section 619, specifically including the Merkley-Levin amended language clarifying the extent of the prohibition on proprietary trading by commercial banks, satisfy my concerns and those of many others with respect to bank trading in derivatives.

In that connection, I am also aware of, and share, the concerns about the extensive reach of Senator Lincoln’s proposed amendment. The provision of derivatives by commercial banks to their customers in the usual course of a banking relationship should not be prohibited.

In sum, my sense is that the understandable concerns about commercial bank trading in derivatives are reasonably dealt with in Section 619 of your reform bill as presently drafted. Both your Bill and the Lincoln amendment reflect the important concern that, to the extent feasible, derivative transactions be centrally cleared or traded on a regulated exchange.

These are needed elements of reform.

I am sending copies of this letter to Secretary Geithner
and to Senators Shelby, Merkley, Levin and Lincoln.

Sincerely

[Signed] Paul.

No matter, then, that securitisation is illegal so that all derivative transactions are likewise illegal under US and Common Law. Neither Paulson nor, it is now clear, Paul Volcker, are in any way concerned about the fact that these transactions are ALL FRAUDULENT.

So far as Mr Volcker is concerned, the banks should be allowed to CONTINUE ENGAGING IN FRAUDULENT FINANCE. Maybe it’s all got too much for the former Fed Chairman.

Alternatively, he may be indifferent to the fact that, with this single letter, he has unilaterally destroyed his towering reputation for integrity and probity.

PUBLIC HAND-WRINGING BY ‘PUT-UPON’ BLANKFEIN
On 7th May, Mr Lloyd Blankfein addressed investors at Goldman Sachs’ Annual Meeting, behind a significant police presence in the street.

Metaphorically holding his hands out to create an impression of penitence, Mr Blankfein promised a ‘rigorous self-examination’ of his firm’s business practices. He would promote ‘ethical principles’, implying that these had been lacking in the past (accurate). An experienced US annual meetings attendee, Evelyn Davis, branded Blankfein as ‘Lord Goldmine’, suggesting that he should resign by Monday 10th May in order to retain ‘what little dignity’ he had left.

Mr Blankfein was forced to field two hours of hostile questioning from disaffected investors at the meeting, amid reports that Goldman has begun discussions with the SEC in pursuit of a possible out-of-court settlement of the SEC’s Civil Case against the firm. But the Civil Case opens up the prospect of multiple litigation against Goldman, including R.I.C.O. suits: so Goldman’s 259 lawyers may have advised the firm to seek an accommodation with the SEC as quickly as possible.

It is probably unnecessary to over-emphasise the obvious point that a financial institution that needs to employ 259 lawyers must, by definition, be accustomed to sailing ‘close to the wind’.

• Such an enormous contingent of in-house lawyers is clearly ‘telling us something’.

BUSH II AND CLINTON CAUTION AGAINST GREED IN CHICAGO
You may now need to have your private vomitarium handy. To complete this account of highest-level financial fraudsters attempting to transform themselves verbally into paragons of rectitude, Forbes magazine reported on 6th May that former President William Jefferson Rockefeller-Clinton and George W. Bush appeared together at a ‘Biotechnology Conference’ in Chicago held between 3rd and 6th May. It was on 6th May that the Settlements payouts were once again aborted, and the sabotage was committed, we understand, via these criminal Presidents’ Mafiosi associates based in Chicago, where the FBI’s Division Five is allied with the underworld.

The gullible or duplicitous Forbes reporter wrote that ‘on a visit to Chicago on Tuesday, I was very encouraged to hear Bill Clinton and George W. Bush deliver [on 4th May] a remarkably non-partisan message to elected officials regarding future regulatory or tax code changes. Speaking at the Bio International Convention, the two former Presidents suggested that legislators recognize the problems and address the greed, but they cautioned against inhibiting capital formation, since Wall Street is where companies find risk capital to develop the innovations that benefit us all’.

‘The forum where they spoke wasn’t open to the public or the press’ [begging the question of what the Forbes journalist was doing there, then], so there was not a peep about it on the 24-hours-a-day news stations. Too bad. It would be nice for people to learn that when it comes to some of the critical issues, politicians may not be as polarized as skeptics suggest’.

Would you like us to summarise what we think of Forbes magazine on the basis of this offering?

• The level of ignorance of the real criminal world displayed by the author of this verbiage cannot be encapsulated in the English language.

• The two self-acknowledged criminal Presidents’ ‘advice’ to Congress to ‘address the greed’ represented a typical example of ‘Blankfeinist’ deceit. Here are two of the greediest individuals who have ever disgraced the American political scene, whose entire existence both in and out of office has been motivated precisely by GREED, suggesting that Congress should ‘address greed’. Do you now begin to understand the true meaning of double-mindedness, which masks such an unfathomable darkness of the soul?

By ‘recommending’ that greed should be ‘addressed’, these inveterate deceivers convey the impression that they disapprove of greed, when greed is what has driven them all their lives.

• The author’s ignorance incorporates a failure to understand that these two criminal finance operatives have all along been in sync as well as rivals, so when they jointly decide to sing a particular song for the benefit of the dumbed-down goyim, they do so for a reason.

• The naive idea that these operatives are principled people of goodwill, when in fact they are egregious serial financial terrorists driven by GREED who should, we are advised, receive the same treatment as Saddam Hussein, tells you that Forbes either looks the other way, or else languishes in a lazy fantasy world which has no observable connection with reality.

THE CHICAGO MAFIOSO FORK POINTED AT OBAMA
President Obama is reported to rely on five people, of whom four are from Chicago, where Obama knows how ‘the system’ works and is believed to be familiar with the notorious Drake Hotel, where the Mafiosi meet and do their deals with the compromised and blackmailed official structures. They are Rahm Emanuel, his abrasive Chief of Staff, David Axelrod and (until recently) Valerie Jarrett, and Michelle, while the fifth kitchen cabinet member is Robert Gibbs, his chief spokesman.

In Chicago, an early Obama supporter was Alderman Edward Burke, first elected in 1969, who runs the Chicago show for Mayor Richard Daley and chairs the city’s Finance Committee.

To cite the City of Chicago’s website: ‘As Chairman of the City Council’s powerful Committee on Finance, Alderman Burke holds the city’s purse strings and is responsible for all legislative matters pertaining to the city’s finances, including municipal bonds, taxes and revenue matters. Alderman Burke became Chairman for the second time in 1989. He previously served from 1983 to 1987’.

In 2001, the Daily Herald reported that Burke was an early supporter of Mr Rod Blagojevich’s campaign to become Governor of Illinois. On 10th February 1985, a Chicago Tribune article reported how a Chicago mobster, Victor Albanese, wound up on the city payroll, asserting that Alderman Burke performed a favour for John D’Arco, a Democratic Committeeman, by hiring the mobster as a ‘ghost employee’, on $900 a month.

John D’Arco was identified by a former FBI agent, William Roemer, as being a co-opted member of the Chicago Mafia, also known as ‘the Outfit’. At one time, John D’Arco was Chicago’s First Ward Alderman, but was forced to step down after the FBI caught him at a meeting with the ‘Outfit’ boss, Sam Giancana, near Chicago’s O’Hare Airport. D’Arco has been one of Alderman Edward Burke’s links into the Chicago ‘Outfit’.

Another link between Alderman Burke and the Chicago Mafia was Alderman Fred Roti, who died in 1999, who was the most powerful Chicago City Alderman in the 1980s.

In 1989, The Washington Post reported that the former FBI agent, William Roemer, had identified Fred Roti in March 1983 as the ‘Outfit’s’ operative on Chicago’s City Council in testimony before the United States Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. In 1991, the US Attorney General identified Roti as a member of the Chicago Mafia. In 1999, the US Justice Department described Fred Roti as the Chicago Mafia’s ‘patronage boss’, elaborating as follows:

‘Fred Roti was convicted of RICO conspiracy, bribery and extortion regarding the fixing of criminal cases inside the Circuit Court of Cook County, including murder cases involving organized crime members or associates and was sentenced to 48 months’ imprisonment. Roti was released from prison in 1997. As First Ward Alderman, Roti was a key political patronage boss and, along with his codefendant Pat Marcy, a fixer for the Chicago Outfit. Roti has directly participated in interfering with the rights of the members of LIUNA (Laborers’ International Union of North America) in the selection of their officers and officials in that he has improperly influenced the selection of officers of CIDC (Chicago Laborers’ District Council) and has been responsible for the pervasive hiring of LaPietra crew members and associates at the Chicago Streets and Sanitation Department. Roti is a made member of the Chicago Outfit’.

Alderman Burke, Obama’s champion, regularly met Roti at the Counsellors Row Restaurant across the street from Chicago City Hall. It didn’t bother Alderman Burke that Roti was a mob boss. On the contrary, shortly after Roti’s death, Burke sponsored a City Council resolution honouring Roti’s life, which read as follows [bearing in mind that the phrase ‘family members’ has a double meaning in this context]:

‘Fred B. Roti, a committed public servant, a cherished friend of many and a good neighbour to all, will be greatly missed and fondly remembered by his many family members, friends and associates’.

On 22nd April 2010, Sam Adam Esq., an attorney for Rod Blagojevich, filed a motion in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division before Judge James B. Zagel, for the Court to issue a trial subpoena to President Obama concerning the disgorging of redacted portions of all tapes and sealed information released under a Protective Order dated 14th April 2009 concerning the scandal surrounding the appointment of Mr Obama’s vacant Senate seat by Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich [CV 08CR888].

Without going into the convoluted detail of the corruption implied by the Motion, its text states [paragraph 8] that ‘President Barack Obama has stated publicly that he was “confident that no representatives of mine would have any part of any deal related to this seat”. [Press conference by President-elect Obama, 11th December 2008]. The word ‘deal’ is defined by the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary as a ‘transaction; bargain; contract; an arrangement for mutual advantage’.

Paragraph 9 of the Motion continues:

‘Yet, despite President Obama stating that no representatives of his had any part of any deals, [a] labor union president told the FBI and the United States Attorneys that he spoke to [the] labor union official on November 3, 2008, who received a phone message from Obama that evening’ and that Obama had recommended Jarrett as his Senate replacement.

The case is much more complex than this, but the general flavour can be obtained, for instance, from Pagaraph 14: ‘President Obama has direct knowledge of allegations made in the indictment [against Blagojevich]. In addition, President Obama’s public statements contradict other witness statements, specifically those made by [the] labor union official and Senate Candidate B. It is anticipated that [the] labor union official will be a witness for the Government’.

‘His accounts of events directly related to the charges in the indictment are contradicted by President Obama’s public statement’.

Paragraph 20 reads: ‘President Barack Obama has direct knowledge of the Senate seat allegation [‘deal’]. President Obama’s testimony is relevant to three fundamental issues of that allegation.

First, President Obama contradicts the testimony of an important Government witness. Secondly, President Obama’s testimony is relevant to the necessary element of intent of the defendant. Thirdly, President Obama is the only one who can say if emissaries were sent on his behalf, who those emissaries were and what, if anything, those emissaries were instructed to do on his behalf. All of these issues are relevant and necessary for the defense of Rod Blagojevich’.

Other dimensions involving Obama’s ‘former’ Chicago (mobster) friend Tony Rezko are also raised in the Motion, which also points out that as all these matters occurred prior to President Obama’s Inauguration, none are covered by Executive Privilege.

Paragraph 31: ‘[Federal precedent holds that] no person, even a President, is above the law and that in appropriate judicial proceedings, documents and other tangible evidence within the very office of the President may be obtained for use in those judicial proceedings. Similarly, where the President himself is a percipient witness to an alleged criminal act, the President must be amenable to subpoena as any other person would be’.

Paragraph 32:

‘Here, President Obama is a critical witness. All of President Obama’s testimony would entail evidence he witnessed before he became President and does not involve Executive Privilege’.

ONGOING BLACKMAIL OPERATIONS TARGETING OBAMA TO PREVENT HIM SETTLING
What is the relevance of all this in our broader context? What has been summarised above is evidence of Obama’s Chicago Mafioso connections and background. The whole point about Obama, and why he surfaced in place of Hillary Clinton, is that he can be blackmailed on several levels simultaneously. The best known dimension is the birth certificate/legitimacy issue, which could be used at any time for that purpose.

But an even more potent prospective blackmail dimension is the Chicago ‘Outfit’ connection and background. The Chicago operative Rahm Emanuel was installed as White House Chief of Staff in order to ensure the continued leverage/effectiveness of this prospective blackmail dimension – the objective being to intimidate and control the new President so that he could be relied upon to continue blocking the Settlements payouts (involving many trillions of dollars) in conformity with the Bush-Clinton criminal fraternity’s intention to hold on to what they have stolen, to crash the system and thereafter to pull the off-balance sheet funds onto the ‘books’ buying up the world’s real assets at firesale prices. That is what is in process, and what the Mafiosi have in mind.

Rod Blagojevich’s Motion to subpoena President Obama emerged from a separate blackmail operation against Obama mounted by Blagojevich himself, who is in fact a minor serpent in the Chicago snakepit. More to the point, both Clintons and Joseph Biden were and remain involved in this operation to control Obama by means (as we suggested a long time ago) of blackmail. And it was out of Chicago that George Bush Sr. pulled off the ransacking of Continental Illinois Bank & Trust Company, where the Delmarva funds were placed, where FBI Division Five runs its main criminal operations, and which handles and controls the felon and money thief, Wanta.

DOCUMENTS PROVE ROUTINE COLLABORATION BETWEEN C.I.A. AND ORGANISED CRIME
Documents obtained by this service in the course of research into the Japanese gold buried in the Philippines (‘Yamashita’s gold’) PROVE direct ongoing intense collaboration between the Central Intelligence Agency and the Mafia. One diagram shows that there was (and remains to this day) a division of labour, with the CIA (Intelligence Power) managing, coordinating and manipulating the cooperation of the banks, Lloyds of London and other domestic and foreign institutions, while the mafia is shown as responsible for enforcement of the movement of the ‘recovered’ (i.e., re-stolen) gold to designated refineries and recipients.

There is no question but that this cooperative model applies across the board, not just in the context of moving gold. In other words, the US Intelligence Power works hand-in-glove with organised crime, the capital of which is Chicago. We are now in a position to PROVE this with documents and will do so in due course.

Which means that, supping with the Devil, the Intelligence Power is irreparably criminalised; and since it has long since usurped the Executive Branch (and the other two branches of the Federal Government, more or less), the consequence is that the United States has a criminal government, is driven by organised criminal priorities (Chicago), and is therefore a menace to civilisation.

Needless to say, this state of affairs could not be more perfect from the perspective of the criminal intelligence organisations serving foreign powers bent on the destruction of the United States, of which the ‘Black’ pan-German DVD, and its nefarious French counterparts, are these days by far the most insidious. Nor can ANY reliance be placed upon Chinese undertakings any longer, as we are led to believe that recent developments demonstrate that, while currently sweet-talking the British Monarchical Power, Chinese intelligence elements are simltaneously doing ‘deals’ with Bush Sr.

Any party stupid enough to believe that ‘deals’ can be done with the head of the serpent is in very urgent need of brain surgery. George Bush Sr. and his filthy apparat double-cross EVERYBODY. It is a complete waste of time seeking accommodating with this serpent, who, we are being told by transatlantic phone, should be shot dead on sight immediately, as he is determined, like Sampson, to ensure the ruination of the entire US and global financial economies if he can’t get his way.

EXPOSURES FORCING AMERICANS TO RECOGNISE THE PERILS OF C.I.A. CRIMINALITY
The forces of law and order, and of the Rule of Law and the Constitution, have woken up to this catastrophe so late in the day that they are engaged in a terrible struggle to decapitate the serpent before it destroys the United States and the Rest of the World as it persists in seeking to retain the upper hand. As we have repeatedly seen, crushing the head of the serpent is no easy task – not least because the serpent has beguiled gullible, naïve and ill-informed foreigners, including some ancient European powers which spawned the serpent in the first place (Britain, France, Germany).

The good news, as we have often pointed out, is that because the serpent’s arrogance was such that it never anticipated the remotest possibility of real resistance to the outpouring of its sewage, it has been caught off-balance – and has never recovered from the shock of being faced down. Recall the scripture that we have often cited in the past [John, Chapter 18, verses 1-6]:

‘When Jesus had spoken these words, he went forth with his disciples over the brook Cedron, where was a garden, into the which he entered, and his disciples.

And Judas, which betrayed him, knew the place: for Jesus ofttimes resorted thither with his disciples.

Judas then, having received a band of men and officers from the chief priests and Pharisees, cometh thither with lanterns and torches and weapons.

Jesus, therefore, knowing all things that should come upon him, went forth, and said unto them, Whom seek ye?

They answered him, Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus saith unto them, I am he. And Judas also, which betrayed him, stood with them.

As soon then as he had said unto them I am he, they went backward, and fell to the ground’.

This is what happens when you stand up to these people on the basis of solid faith. They cannot believe that anyone could have the temerity to stand in their way.

MEANWHILE THE SINISTER ‘OFFICE OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH’ IS STILL IN THE WORKS
As discussed in the report of 27th April, the ‘Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010’, introduced by Josef Stalin’s grandson (Senator Christopher Dodd) in the US Senate under the geomasonic number S. 3217 (which, according to the esoteric Babylonian numerological drivel and gobbldegook to which these serpents are bound, devolves to their ‘magic’ number 13 (3+2+1+7 = 13)), provides for the establishment of the sinister intelligence unit called the ‘Office of Financial Research’ within the US Treasury – to which all key financial powers will in practice be delegated, enabling the Treasury to continue sponsoring Fraudulent Finance operations beneath the radar with selected corrupt counterparties, with no checks and balances whatsoever.

This all-powerful intelligence unit will be equipped with powers to destroy any entity, whether overtly operating in the financial sector or not, and whether based domestically or abroad, on an arbitrary basis, the blanket cover being that the targeted entity will be deemed to be an actual or prospective threat to the security of the United States (meaning Fraudulent Finance).

POWERS TO TAKE DOWN ANY ENTITY ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD
Since US corporations and financial enterprises, handling dollars, litter the whole world, what this means in practice is that the decadent US dollar will be propped up by this ‘hidden’ arbitrary power buried inside the Treasury. Any corporation handling US dollars could be targeted. As the Office of Financial Research will have unlimited arbitrary powers (more of which may be buried within the pages of the colossal draft Senate Bill that have not been published), it will certainly be equipped with all means necessary to destabilise and destroy entities that it considers to be a threat to the security of the United States – which, in translation, means: threatens the open-ended perpetration with the US Treasury’s connivance, of Fraudulent Finance operations, including securitisation and the proliferation of derivatives ‘products’ based on NOTHING. This explains why Paul Volcker has sacrificed his reputation for integrity, as exposed above.

The US Treasury will therefore be able, with no checks and balances, to implement by stealth an arbitrary pan-German-style ‘coup d’état by installments’ (5).

On 7th May, The Wall Street Journal reported that, following pressure from the Deputy Treasury Secretary, Neal Wolin, and the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, Dr Ben Bernanke, an amendment or provision sponsored by Senator Bernie Sanders which would have exposed certain US Federal Reserve decision-making to Congressional auditors, and which would therefore have largely repealed a 32-year-old law shielding Federal Reserve monetary policy from Congressional auditors, was watered down. Dr Bernanke wrote to the Senate Banking Committee Chairman, Mr Dodd, stating that the Sanders measure would ‘seriously threaten monetary policy independence, increase inflation fears and market interest rates, and damage economic stability and job creation’.

This is the standard Fed response to any attempt to prise open its secrecy culture – which masks its illicit financial transactions, creative accounting, operations with corrupted foreign central banks via the Federal Reserve Inter Bank Settlement Fund, and secret deals with the Treasury.

DESPERATE E.U. MEASURE TO ‘SAVE THE (PAN-GERMAN) EURO’
INCOMPATIBLE WITH SAVING THE FAILING SATRAP E.U. ‘MEMBER STATES’
Before we learned that $1.0 trillion had been stolen from the Gold Badge Paymaster as described above, the following ‘straight’ analysis of the European ‘bailout’ operation had been prepared for this report. We leave this text intact, but you should bear in mind the further, sinister dimension elaborated above, when considering what follows. If you read this carefully, you will see that none of this is actually inconsistent with what is reported higher up this analysis. All that was agreed was an intention to ‘create’ a bail-out fund, begging the question: how would this be financed. Mention of the International Monetary Fund is also consistent, as the Fund suddenly expanded one of its facilities from $50 Billion to $500 billion, as we reported earlier, in April, almost certainly covering the placement of a counterparty $500 billion in IMF accounts ‘lifted’ from the Settlements funds.

On the European stage, 16 ‘Member States’ of the European Union Collective ended a 14-hour overnight session at the European Commission (a criminal enterprise: see our report dated 2nd May 2010) in Brussels by ‘agreeing’ to ‘create’ a fund worth some 750 billion Euros ($962 billion), incorporating backing from the International Monetary Fund, to the satrap ‘Member States’ facing financial instability, while the European Central Bank tore up its rulebook, by stating that it will buy up official and private sector debt.

Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, the former Secretary of the Agitation and Propaganda Department of the Young Communists at Marx-Lenin University, led the chorus, backed by little José Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission, in proclaiming that this outcome confirmed that ‘we will do ANYTHING IT TAKES to support the Euro’.

OPEN-ENDED E.U. LIABILITY POTENTIALLY IMPOSED
UPON BRITISH TAXPAYERS EVEN THOUGH BRITAIN IS BUST
Now the Brown Government hastened to ‘ratify’ the Lisbon Treaty, which provides that decisions of this nature are taken by ‘Qualified Majority’, meaning that no satrap ‘Member State’ can veto such decisions of the Collective. Which in turn means that Britain, the Government of which is financially strapped as never before in its history thanks to the permissive cack-handed mismanagement of Gordon Brown, who clings to office in Downing Street, will be called upon to help finance bail-outs for ‘Member States’ which discover that they cannot survive if bound to the Collective Currency régime, which is ‘irrevocable’ under the 1992 Maastricht Treaty – that is to say, they are stuck with the wrong rate of exchange until the end of the solar system.

Therefore, on top of the financial burdens that will have to be borne by the British taxpayer due to Brown’s irresponsible stewardship of the financial economy for generations to come, money will have to be conjured up out of nowhere to help bail out ‘Member States’ the economies of which are being systematically destroyed by their Governments’ brainwashed idolatry of membership of the EU Collective (EUdolatry).

Taken to its logical conclusion, this means that the British Government (when one exists) attaches greater importance at all times to not offending the EU sacred cow, than it does to the welfare of the people of Great Britain. In other words, the interests of the British people are being sacrificed on the altar of the corrupt god of the pan-Germans; while the dense political UK Establishment and the brainwashed Whitehall bureaucracy, wedded to EU membership because they lack the smarts to distinguish between ‘cooperation’ and collectivisation, persist with their sterile internationalist agenda contrary to the wishes or interests of the British people.

OUTGOING LABOUR GOVERNMENT CORRECTLY REFUSED TO GO ALONG
To give the outgoing Labour Government its due, Aleister Darling, the former Chancellor of the Exchequer, refused to go along with any pledge to make available a huge sum of money for the so-called EU bail-out plan. This was perfectly correct, as the Chancellor, like all his colleagues, was denuded of all powers and was merely in situ pending a political resolution. But Europeans, led by the French, not understanding this, or not wanting to bother to try to understand the true situation, responded with an outpouring of vituperative hatred along the lines of ‘when you’re in trouble, don’t come begging to us. Rely on God instead’. Lovely people these EU ‘colleagues!

A piece of work by the name of Jean-Pierre Jouyet, Chairman of the French Financial Services Authority, said: ‘The English are very certainly going to be targeted given the political difficulties they have. Help yourself and heaven will help you. If you don’t want to show solidarity to the Eurozone, then let’s see what happens to the United Kingdom’.

OUTCOME OF THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION: TEMPORARY CHECK MATE
It is hard to imagine a recipe more likely to morph into a pretext for the wholesale overthrow of the complacent and self-satisfied British political and bureaucratic Establishment. We have obtained a glimpse of the instability to come following the inconclusive outcome of the General Election held on 6th May 2010, following years of Brown’s financial mismanagement and parliamentary sleaze.

The Conservatives could have won the election with an overall majority had they not long since decided to pretend that the issue of Britain’s hugely expensive and sterile relationship with the European Union Collective, involving the illegal remittance of Value Added Tax receipts to the European Commission, a criminal enterprise given that its accounts have been explicitly NOT approved by the Luxembourg-based Court of Auditors for the past 14 years [report of 2nd May 2010], is a non-issue for public consumption and electoral purposes.

Calculations based on votes cast prepared by the former MEP for South-East England, Ashley Mote, have revealed as follows:

• The Conservatives could have had a comfortable working majority if they had made an unequivocal commitment to a referendum on British membership of the EU.

• The UKIP (United Kingdom Independence Party) vote, favouring a much harsher policy towards Britain’s sterile EU participation, would have collapsed and, while not every one of the 25 seats listed below might have been delivered to the ‘Conservatives’, they would have emerged with a working majority of about 40.

In the following table of constituences where the ‘Conservatives’ came second, the first number shown represents the winner’s majority, and the second number shown represents the UKIP vote:

Bolton West 92 901
Derby North 613 829
Derbyshire North East 2445 2636
Dorset Mid 269 2109
Dudley North 649 3267
Great Grimsby 714 2043
Hampstead and Kilburn 42 408
Hull North 641 1358
Middlesbrough South 1677 1881
Morley and Outwood 1101 1506
Newcastle-Under-Lyme 1552 3491
Norwich South 310 1145
Oldham East 103 1720
Plymouth Moor 1588 3188
Rochdale 889 1999
Sheffield Central 165 652
Solihull 175 1200
Somerset and Frome 1817 1932
Southampton and Itchen 192 1928
St Austell and Newquay 1312 1757
St Ives South 1719 2560
Swansea West 504 716
Walsall North 990 1737
Walsall South 800 1711
Wirral South 531 1274

Additionally, the Conservatives should have won Wells, which was lost to the Liberal Democrats with a majority of 800. But the UKIP vote was 1711; so including the promise of a referendum on Britain’s continued sterile membership of the EU could have secured this seat as well.

The Guardian reported on 8th May 2010 that ‘UKIP’s bid to beat the Speaker’ (who is traditionally unopposed by the main parties) in Buckingham, ended in third place. Lessons for the Conservative right, there, perhaps, if they think they can win by tacking to the extremes’.

But the data displayed above reveal that this assessment is the very reverse of the truth. If the ‘Conservatives’ had accommodated the known preferences of adherents of the United Kingdom Independence Party, they would have achieved a comfortable working majority and would not have found themselves on the edge of a deep abyss, as was the case as this report closed.

GORDON BROWN RESIGNS: CAMERON GOES TO THE PALACE
After days of horse-trading, it transpired that the Labour Party could not reach agreement with the Liberal Democrats. Faced with this situation, Mr Gordon Brown revised his intended resignation scenario this evening (11th May) and resigned immediately. As this update is being added, David Cameron has entered Buckingham Palace and is seeing Her Majesty The Queen who is appointing him Prime Minister. At the time of writing, no details of the composition of the new Government are forthcoming. For numerous observers, this is an unexpected development, after many days during which the impression had been formed that the British political impasse resembled ‘check mate’.

• The reasoin for the ‘unexpected development’ is alluded to in the Update above.

WELCOMING CAMERON, OBAMA PRAISES
THE ‘SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP’ HE TRASHED EARLIER
As is well known, President Obama and some of his associates have gone out of their way to trash and ridicule the so-called ‘Special Relationship’, which is a myth desigend to bamboozle the Brits into believing that the United States is the United Kingdom’s most reliable ally: whereas the reality, as is being stripped down to bare metal ‘as we speak’, that the United States remains in thrall to the criminalised Intelligence Power which is controlled and corrupted by the decades-old pan-German penetration alluded to in these reports.

Therefore, the news that President Obama called David Cameron as soon as he stepped into Downing Street to congratulate him on becoming Prime Minister and to pour praise over the so-called ‘Special Relationship’ went down like a thousand lead balloons (as opposed to points of light) in certain London quarters. What this man says usually diverges from what he does. But what this does again illustrate is the brazen gall that these controlled people have when they contradict themselves, on the assumpting that everybody has forgotten what they said earlier.

• It’s called ‘dialectical doublemindedness’. Or Leninist ‘contradictions’.

Notes and References:

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
(1): From our report dated 27th April 2010 [Archive]:

THE NSA/CIA/USAF HANDLER OF WANTA’S PROMOTER
As these exposures have unfolded, this Editor has been viciously attacked from time to time by a notorious controlled US fabricator and peddler of gross lies on behalf of Wanta, styling himself as an ‘intelligence expert’, named Thomas Heneghan. We have reported separately that Heneghan was authorised, by Wanta, according to documents we hold, to open one or more bank accounts for Marvelous Investments, a vehicle reportedly used inter alia for the financing of Al-Qaeda.

Thomas Heneghan’s disinformation handler is NSA/CIA/USAF Lieutenant General Otis C. Johnson. Concerning this proven criminalist operative (Johnson), The SEC News Digest dated 21st May 1986 reported [page 1] as follows:

Complaint Filed against Otis C. Johnson: The Los Angeles Regional Office [of the SEC] filed a complaint on May 6 in the US District Court for the District of Colorado against Otis C. Johnson seeking a permanent injunction and other equitable relief for violations of the antifraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The complaint in question alleges that Johnson defrauded N.D. Resources, Inc. (NDR) and its public shareholders. Specifically, the complaint alleges that Johnson provided NDR with a false geological report concerning certain mining claims and, after NDR had entered into a joint venture with an accomplice of Johnson in order to develop the claims, conspired to provide positive drilling reports to NDR when, in fact, no drilling had been done. The complaint further alleges that Johnson sold approximately 240,353 shares of NDR common stock while the stock price was inflated as a result of press releases issued by NDR concerning the drilling reports. [SEC v. Otis C. Johnson, DCO, Civil Action NO 86-945 (LR-11105)].

The SEC News Digest dated 10th July 1989 reported [page 1] as follows:

Otis C. Johnson enjoined: The Los Angeles Regional Office announced that on June 22 Judge Lewis T. Babcock, US District Court for the District of Colorado, signed an Order of Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief against Otis C. Johnson. The Order enjoins Johnson from future violations of the antifraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Order directs Otis C. Johnson to disgorge his profits from sales of N.D. Resources, Inc. (NDR), which disgorgement is waived based upon the truth, accuracy and completeness of Johnson’s sworn representations concerning his present inability to pay disgorgement. Johnson consented to the Order without admitting or denying the allegations of wrongdoing in the Complaint.

The Complaint alleges that Johnson defrauded NDR and its public shareholders by, among other things, providing NDR with a false geological report concerning certain mining claims and further conspiring to provide positive drilling reports to the company when, in fact, no drilling had been done, and by selling approximately 240,353 shares of the company’s stock while the stock price was inflated as a result of press releases concerning the drilling reports. [SEC v. Otis C. Johnson, DCO, Civil Action No. 87-B-1693 (LR-12149)].

The SEC News Digest dated 24th August 1992 reported [page 4] as follows:

Otis Johnson III Pleads Guilty: The Commission and Michael J. Norton, US Attorney for the District of Colorado, announced that on July 20, 1992, Otis C. Johnson III (Johnson) of Denver, Colorado, pleaded guilty to two criminal informations. The first such information, filed May 20, 1992, charged violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, conspiracy to commit mail fraud and securities fraud in the purchase and sale of the securities of Corporate Quest, Inc. (Corporate Quest). The second information, filed July 20, 1992, charged violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, conspiracy to commit mail fraud, wire fraud, and interstate transportation of stolen property, in the purchase and sale of the securities of United Financial Operations (United Financial).

Johnson admitted in his plea agreement that in 1987 and 1988 [that] he participated in schemes to manipulate and conduct fraudulent transactions in the securities of United Financial and Corporate Quest. Johnson also admitted that he and co-conspirators conducted prearranged trades through controlled and nominee accounts and paid for the trades in Corporate Quest’s securities with worthless checks totaling approximately $313,000. As a result of the co-conspirators’ activities, four brokerage firms lost approximately $262,000.

Johnson is scheduled to be sentenced on September 21, 1992 at 9:00 a.m. [U.S. v. Otis C. Johnson III, Criminal Action No. 92-CR-181, U.S.D.C. Colo. (LR-13345)].

• NSA/CIA/USAF Lieutenant General Otis C. Johnson III did NOT do jail time.

• The penalty for wire fraud in the United States is TWENTY YEARS PER COUNT.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
(2): We reproduce herewith again, for convenience AND EMPHASIS, the entire text revealing the Halliburton scamming operations published in our report dated 2nd May 2010, taken originally from our report dated 26th May 2008 [Archive]:

EXPOSURE OF HALLIBURTON’S SCAMMING OPERATIONS: 26 MAY 2008
The following description of the pit of corrupt degradation known as Halliburton is excerpted from our report dated 28th May 2008 [ARCHIVE]. It reflects the detailed inside knowledge of a fearless and serious-minded whistleblower. [Note: The narrative as partially reproduced here starts ‘out of context’. However you can pick up such context as is necessary to be in a position to comprehend the cess-pit of degradation that is being exposed, as you read into the excerpt]:

THE HALLIBURTON DRUG THUG AND THE STOLEN FEDERAL SALARIES SCAM
A former top CIA aide to Tenet and 30-year CIA veteran now reveals the criminal background of ‘HallCIA’, the thug who yanked the officer’s phone from the wall, ransacked the CIA operative’s office, had the officer incarcerated in Halliburton’s own cell in the basement of CIA headquarters and on a separate occasion punched holes in the officer’s office wall, displayed episodes of extreme violence and was observed by many to be high on drugs. He was also a murderer….

This was the criminal whom Cheney asserted to be a friend who could never be arrested. This description leads into a summary of another scam, whereby multiple salaries are paid into corrupt Halliburton employees’ secret Swiss bank accounts:

‘HallCIA’ and the Head Programmer were moved back to Halliburton’s main office, just like the priests sexually abusing children are moved to a different parish.

They were never prosecuted…

[Dressed in FBI uniform provided by Halliburton, the operative is engaged in an FBI action to arrest this Halliburton thug], He was arrested for FIRST DEGREE MURDER OF AN FBI OFFICER. I had proof that the FBI officer that he had murdered was a bona fide one with proper papers and vetting in the FBI’s personnel archives. The FBI had fingerprint and DNA evidence to prove that the Halliburton programmer was the murderer.

They even had a trial and a conviction of the man for that murder.

He had feigned a fainting episode right before the reading of the sentence and been taken to a hospital. He then assaulted the hospital guard inside his room and left him unconscious in his bed. Then he impersonated the guard using his uniform. He later went to a lawyer who put in a motion to declare the trial a mistrial on the grounds of a technicality: the defendant had not been present at the reading of the sentence. The fact that the criminal had committed a second nearly deadly assault the same day in apparent good health, was omitted from that motion.

The FBI-clandestine CIA raid that I organized was on the private flat of ‘HallCIA’. It was not at his house where he lived with a prostitute whom he pimped, according to a CIA file. He did not keep his contraband items there as there were too many unsavory people coming through his house.

WHAT THE FBI FOUND IN THE CIA-HALLIBURTON DRUG THUG’S APARTMENT
At the flat the FBI confiscated drugs in pusher quantities and also illegal weapons, including some unregistered machine guns, explosives and hand-held artillery that could blow big holes through a wall for illegal entry. He had one bedroom devoted just to weapons, with shelves devoted to about half-kilo packages of drugs. It was equipped with a padlock. CIA top secret documents were strewn all over the bed, dresser and floor of the master bedroom.

It looked like a hurricane had hit the bedroom even before we arrived. The padlock was broken on the door to the weapons and drug room and the door was open when we arrived. But all the drugs were still neatly on the shelves. The flat may have been raided by Russian intelligence before we arrived, leaving the CIA documents behind as cover-up after copying them.

The FBI collected fingerprints and I collected the CIA documents. After the raid I returned to the FBI station and filled in the appropriate forms to write a FBI report up on the raid. As I was doing so, the two FBI officers who I had spoken with two days before walked by the desk I was using. They did a double take seeing me in the FBI uniform…. I told them that I had just tested FBI vetting and security procedures for a report I was writing for the CIA. I also explained to them that I had just successfully impersonated an FBI official to the extent of going on a raid with them, and not one had yet asked for my name or run it through a background check. I showed them the CIA top-secret documents the raid had netted and they laughed at the ruse I had played on the FBI.

They were not laughing, however, when I explained how I had gotten that FBI uniform and signed the papers. They checked on their computers; I was not yet registered on the records of the FBI.

I asked them to arrest all of the appropriate Halliburton people involved in that scam. They called the Director of the FBI and I also spoke to him. He refused to authorize the arrests.

He told me: ‘Write up your report and let me read it first’. I offered to drive over immediately with the evidence. He refused to make any time to see me. I immediately faxed him a short report and enough evidence to warrant the arrests. Nothing happened.

MULTIPLE SALARIES PAID INTO SWISS BANK ACCOUNTS
But the next day when the local FBI checked my name again, they called me to let me know that I was officially part of the FBI now per their computer. I promptly sent in a full report to the FBI, the CIA, and the Pentagon on this scam to sign up Halliburton employees as their officers and have the US taxpayer pay their salaries. Just like Halliburton over-billed, some Halliburton employees were
collecting THREE US Government salaries; one from the Pentagon, one from the FBI, and one from the CIA. I wrote in my report that I had signed up in all three places via Halliburton’s scam to see how long it would be before those scams were stopped.

I put on the three forms, separate Swiss bank accounts. The point was to use the accounts as evidence of Halliburton corruption when those cases came to trial; I have not touched a cent of that money. The Directors of the FBI, the CIA, and the Chief of the JCS that I sent those reports to did not implement my list of recommendations; one of them was to shut down all of those public salaries going to Halliburton employees. At least, they had not been implemented as of about Summer 2004 when I last checked those accounts.

Another recommendation was to make sure that everyone in those agencies is properly vetted and drug tested as per that agency’s usual security measures. Because I was concerned that my clear recommendations would not be acted upon, I despatched copies of those letters, the forms that I had signed, and the numbers of the Swiss bank accounts to the GAO. In my covering letter to the GAO I told them that I had given them the authority to check the balances in those accounts by written authorization to the Swiss bank.

I had hoped that seeing US taxpayer’s money streaming into those accounts would give them an incentive to prosecute those cases promptly. Since the banks were not in the United States, I doubt that coercion applied to the bankers will erase those accounts, but I could be wrong. Since I had long been a covert CIA person, those communications with officials and the banks were under aliases. The GAO however has all of the proper information to check those accounts again and to prosecute these cases. I myself no longer remember any of the aliases and account numbers, so I
couldn’t access that money even if I wanted to. I never intended to use that money at all, so I did not record those aliases and numbers into my personal effects.

In 2004 when I checked the accounts, I did so from within the CIA by pulling up the report that I had written to the DCI. I have no way to check those accounts now so I do not know whether that scam, as evidenced by a single person’s accounts, has been stopped. When I checked in 2004, two years had already passed. The US taxpayer had paid [as follows]: via the CIA, about $80,000.00 each year, for a total of about $160,000.00; via the FBI, about $50,000.00 each year, for a total of $100,000.00; and via the Pentagon, about $80,000.00 each year for a total of about $160,000.00, or roughly $420,000.00 total into those three Swiss accounts…

I also checked on whether Halliburton continued paying those employees if it signed them up for a Federal salary. The answer was no, except for rare exceptions. ‘HallCIA’ had continued receiving a Halliburton salary while getting one at the CIA, but the Head Programmer had not.

When I checked in 2004 the number of Halliburton employees getting a CIA salary was over 200, the number receiving an FBI salary was over 400, and the number of Halliburton employees receiving a Pentagon salary, was over 300. Suppose that the total for that is about 1,000 salaries each at, say, $50,000 a year. That would mean that the US taxpayer was being bilked (by Cheney) of $50 million a year of fraudulent salaries. Over the eight years that this Cheney has been in the Vice President’s office, that could easily add up to $400 million in savings for Halliburton in not having had to pay salaries. No wonder it was so easy to get that FBI uniform and salary sent out to me by talking to a Halliburton VP. Other Halliburton programmers had complained to me that they took a ‘cut in pay’ to work at the CIA location. They said that ‘the takings are good’, and ‘Halliburton fences the items for us in a 50-50 split’.

HALLIBURTON’S THIEVES INSIDE THE CIA AND THE INEVITABLE CONSEQUENCES
When I heard that Halliburton’s people were stealing from inside the halls of the CIA, loud alarm
bells went off inside my head. The items inside the CIA which were easiest to carry out were of course its documents.

And any computer that one stole inside the CIA was likely to have top-secret information on it, in spades. It was a counterintelligence person’s nightmare, and now it was mine. The fact that the Head of the Halliburton section offices at the CIA had just sold the CIA’s communication satellite encryption security codes to Moscow burned in my mind.

The Russians had paid him $20,000 for that betrayal.

He had no clue as to their black market value. It made me worry that the Russians and the Chinese could buy every secret inside the CIA for a price that they could afford. More than one Halliburton person inside the CIA had admitted to me that they were stealing to make up for their cut in pay. Halliburton had switched them to Federal salaries, making the CIA pick up the tab [see above].

One Halliburton person at the CIA had told me that they were all stealing enough to make up for that cut in pay. [They were ONLY in it for the money: taking their cue from Cheney and Bush: Ed].

Therefore, the first thing I did was to find out what those 40-odd people used to earn at Halliburton. I had the CIA’s accounting office print out for me what the CIA was now paying them. My mouth then dropped open in shock. Each one of them would have to steal over $10,000 worth of CIA secrets or goods a year to break even. In some cases the cut in pay was much higher. One man took a $50,000 a year cut in pay when he switched to the Federal salary. At the average $23,000 cut in pay, the 40 workers together had sustained a $920,000 cut in pay. I had been told that Halliburton was fencing the goods in a 50%-50% split. So, about 2 million dollars’ worth of good at black market prices would be stolen from the CIA, if they actually made up their lost salaries stealing.

[There followed a summary of the notorious Aldrich Ames, Clyde Conrad, Larry Wu-Tai Chin, John Anthony Walker, and Robert Hanssen espionage cases, omitted here]

On February 22, 1994, Ames and his wife were formally charged by the United States Department of Justice with spying for the Soviet Union and Russia. Mr Ames could have faced the death penalty, since his betrayal had resulted in CIA ‘assets’ being killed. However, he received a sentence of life imprisonment, and his wife received only a five-year prison sentence for her conspiracy to commit espionage and tax evasion as part of a plea bargain by Ames.

TENET AND CHENEY REFUSED TO ADDRESS THESE ISSUES
I walked down to the office a very high-ranking CIA analyst, about third in the hierarchy in that department, a man I trusted. People advance inside the CIA by one of two means normally, being very good at what they do or being very good at lying to please those above them. The heads of each section were often in the latter category, as a general rule. I asked him how many secrets the Russians could buy for $2 million a year, if they had 40 moles able to walk the halls of the CIA. In the posing of the question I explained that the hypothetical moles would be assumed to be ‘efficient’ criminals without formal espionage training. I asked him what effect that would have on national security. He asked me if this was a conversational gambit or a request for a formal report to answer my question. I thought about it a moment and then said the latter.

That meant that I had to go get a signature on a form. By submitting to Mr Tenet new requests for 10 separate reports on a wide variety of important topics, I quickly brought the analyst the signed form that he needed. He whistled in surprise when he reviewed the assignment given to him there in black and white. Then he asked me ‘Is this about the Privatized Employees’ invasion of the CIA?’ I said yes. He said: ‘I have been urging Tenet to let us study that risk for months. No go. How did you get this when I couldn’t?’

I explained to him my method and also that the Head of the Halliburton group had just sold the CIA’s Communication Satellite Encryption Security Codes to the Russians.

He hadn’t heard that [because] Tenet had put a lid on it even within the CIA. I promised to show him the proof. I came back and gave him and a few of his top staff an hour long briefing on what I had learned. One man was actually in tears as I finished.

Another said: ‘This marks the end of US national security’. Another said, ‘No. US honor died already and no memo was sent announcing its funeral’.

I asked them what information they needed to make a proper assessment. They said that it would help them if I could find out how much the 40 people were actually making off their thefts inside the CIA, and a list of what they were stealing. I came back the next day with the list of how much each one had been paid by Halliburton in ‘bonuses’, which was the code word for fenced items, and what each ‘bonus’ was for. That list of what each bonus was for was like what the programmers really did in morphing an appliance rack into a bread slice rack. It was not a specifically accurate description but it related to the item in a fairly straightforward way.

CHENEY WAS INFORMED IN A RECORDED PHONE CALL
I showed the list to Tenet and tried to brief him on how dangerous it was.

He did not want to hear. Tenet had not followed my recommendations, which would have stopped the thefts. And he did not want further reasons why he should do so… I called Cheney and begged him to send a memo over to Halliburton setting up a program to [address these extremely serious issues]. I even faxed him a memo so that all he had to do was sign to get that to happen. He did not deny that Halliburton was selling items stolen from the CIA. He did not deny that he had the power to impose the necessary changes at Halliburton by sending the memo. He did not deny that he had the power to order Tenet to institute effective measures to stem the tide of the thefts.

As the phone recording of that call shows, I kept briefing him on the problem while he kept saying that he refused to discuss the matter with me.

I sent a copy of that call over to the GAO because it showed that I had in fact managed to inform Vice President Cheney of the seriousness of the thefts. In that call [to Cheney] I cited that the likely consequences were the shredding of US national security and the wholly unnecessary deaths of its covert personnel. I also set up a surveillance operation behind Cheney’s and Tenet’s back to actually inspect each item that Halliburton fenced from the CIA.

COUNTERINTELLIGENCE OPERATION AGAINST TENET AND CHENEY BACKFIRES
That is, I had an ex-CIA operative with counter-intelligence experience whom I trusted, apply to Halliburton. I instructed him to offer to ‘help them fence their CIA goods and get higher prices for them’. Call him Alan for short. A Halliburton VP, the same one who sent me the FBI uniform, sent me a ‘thank you’ letter for referring Alan to them. He no doubt believed that I was corrupt and making a kickback. It was to my advantage to foster that image of myself without it actually being true. In my position it was best if everything I did could be interpreted as corrupt at the same time that I was collecting the evidence for prosecution.

That operative, Alan, ended up terribly overworked in no time. The analysts and I had been off by a factor of THREE in the amount that was routinely being stolen by Halliburton from the CIA.

We did not find that out until the Halliburton people realized that they could get more money by making sure that Alan sold the goods for them. That meant Alan had to sell them at on average much higher than twice what they could get for them themselves, even by selling directly to the Russians. That was not as hard as it would have been with regular stolen goods; the Halliburton people did not know their true worth on the black market. Alan could make a better profit selling a document to a rich government such as France, which would have been very bad in the hands of the poorer Chinese or Russians. Before that, Halliburton had sold mainly to the Russians. [Editor: Further allegation that Halliburton has sold CIA secrets to the Russians].

The French were very helpful to us in keeping many things out of the hands of the Russians. They had wised up quickly as to our problem and how to assist us. The United Kingdom was less helpful because they could get that same information by merely filing a request for it.

The French were not as tight into the CIA, though they were still US allies. We needed top dollar for the stolen items because we had to make up for the fact that we were not selling off all of the items due to their national security risk. We were hiding the fact from Halliburton’s management that we were really sending the items back to the CIA.

OVER 50% OF HALLIBURTON SALES BREACHED NATIONAL SECURITY
We could not send computers back, as it was impossible to ensure that the Russians etc. had not altered them in the meantime. Those had to be scrubbed clean using a special erasing procedure. But it was possible to send back documents. We had initially thought that it would be only 10% of the items that had to be vetoed on national security grounds. But as we got a better understanding of what was being sold via Halliburton, that figure went up to a little over 50%

[Editor: More damning allegations against Halliburton as a continuing threat to US national security. George W. Bush authorised this grotesque corruption and treachery via his Executive Orders].

[The high-level operative and source for this information left the CIA for Canada in 2002].

Subsequently, operatives working inside the CIA to address this catastrophic situation] demanded that Tenet should lock the unvetted people out of the building.

In the process of showing how serious the security violations were, they revealed the oversight (or counterintelligence) operation against Tenet and Cheney themselves. That ended up revealing that they were recovering about 50% of the items and about 30% of their black market worth. Tenet informed Cheney of that fact, and Cheney ordered an end to the oversight.

I later sent copies of the relevant telephone calls revealing all this to the GAO. The Russians and Mossad had a complete set of White House calls, including of [calls concerning what was] for sale. The CIA also had a fairly complete set. When I was forced back into the CIA in October 2003 from Canada with threats and worse, I heard about the troubles that the oversight people had suffered over the intervening 16 months. They had been unable to perform oversight for four months.

During that time Halliburton had fired their Private Eyes, the ex-CIA operatives that they had there. Instead, Halliburton had hired its own experts on Black Market Intelligence Pricing and had sold all of the stolen items without regard to US national security. I then despatched over to the GAO about a dozen phone conversations by Halliburton’s high officials demonstrating their reckless disregard for national security and the lives of covert operatives. [Therefore, this information is all available for the Congressional Committee to access immediately: Editor].

But it now gets much, much worse….

THEFTS OF CIA COMPUTERS LEADING TO AN UNIMAGINABLE CATASTROPHE
The next part of the narrative briefing leads into a description of the most ghastly consequences, for which Vice President Richard B. Cheney is clearly indicated by the narrative to be responsible, given his Luciferian greed for ‘profit’ which of course is on its own an impeachable offence:

It was only after a [hitherto unreported: Ed.] colossal national security catastrophe that the [CIA operatives who had carried on trying to get results] managed to get Tenet to insist that Halliburton rehire their ex-CIA ‘Private Eyes’. The oversight people briefed me on [the catastrophe] as soon as I returned. The first day I came back to the CIA’s Headquarters, they kept me up all night telling me about it. I cried many times that night for my country and for the harm that had been done to her. I cried for the people who had died so brutally and unnecessarily.

Many, many more intelligence professionals lost their lives as a consequence of Cheney’s selling secrets than lost their lives because of the traitorous behaviour of Aldrich Ames. Ames is serving a life sentence for what he did. Cheney’s Halliburton people were still working at the CIA and were still stealing there because of Cheney’s protection of them. They were still walking inside the halls of the CIA every day and going into its offices to ‘have a chat’.

It was such an egregious violation of national security that some oversight members quit the CIA. Others said to me: ‘Why should we look like criminals who are enabling this theft’? ‘We are not making a cent off it… Yet we have been threatened by Tenet that we will be put in prison because we know of the thefts and hence must be guilty of them… We are being treated like criminals because we are trying to stop the most dangerous of these sales’.

[Editor: Gross abuse by Tenet of the Misprision of Felony Statute].

I later collected a memo from Cheney to Tenet which stated that the oversight of the sales by the CIA was cutting into profits and had to be stopped. It recommended imprisoning all of those in the CIA suspected of being a bottleneck in [the raking in of] US corporate profits. Tenet prohibited the oversight within a week of receiving that memo. The GAO has a copy of the memo and also of the memo that Tenet sent out threatening imprisonment if anyone was discovered to have decreased US corporate profits. They also have the later memorandum that Mr Tenet sent, which threatened imprisonment if anyone knew about stolen goods and did not report it to the designated official.

Those who had reported thefts to that official had been fired soon afterwards.

Thieves do not report stolen goods; people with integrity do, until it is clear that it is pointless and dangerous to do so. I also sent the GAO the document suggesting this ruse of a new designated official as a way to stop the oversight. That designated official never prosecuted a case of theft against a Halliburton person. He came from Halliburton! He had in fact been recommended for the job by ‘HallCIA’ to Cheney, who then recommended him for the job. I sent over to the GAO a tape of the phone conversation between ‘HallCIA’ and Cheney. On it. ‘HallCIA’ says that the man that he is recommending will stop the losses of revenues ‘from our CIA sales’.

HALLIBURTON CROOK BRAGGED ABOUT LUCRATIVE SALE TO THE RUSSIANS
Later he bragged about one of his sales to Russia of ‘one of our CIA products’, and says, ‘too bad we can’t make more of them’. It was clear that he was referring to the stolen goods that Halliburton stole from the CIA, not products that Halliburton made and sold to the CIA. The designated official was not vetted by the CIA. He was stealing from the CIA while working out of the Halliburton offices. I sent to the GAO a signed statement from a CIA security guard who caught him carrying a computer of the CIA’s out of the front door. That man could have employed the back door out of their offices manned only by Halliburton’s guards. He was so used to stealing from the CIA and getting away with it that he forgot, and used the front door.

That is what he told the guard: ‘I forgot… Give me a hand and we’ll take it out the back door’. The Halliburton guards did just that. They helped the Halliburton thieves load CIA computers into their private cars. I sent the GAO several CIA security camera clips of that happening.

The CIA had massive amounts of security camera data showing that [activity]. The CIA security people were afraid to report the thefts that they saw, because they did not want to lose their jobs without it even cleaning up the problem. By the time I returned to the CIA, 16 people had lost their jobs due to reporting thefts to the designated official that Tenet’s memo had directed them to use. No one at the CIA knew about the item sold during the blackout that caused the national security catastrophe, until after the catastrophe happened. [Details of this national security catastrophe, unfortunately containing graphic and disturbing language, now follow].

THE CATASTROPHE, COURTESY OF THE CORRUPTION OF TENET, CHENEY AND BUSH
The first sign of that Catastrophe [with a capital C: Ed] was a dead body lying on a sidewalk in a foreign city. The body had been the teenage daughter of a CIA officer. The body was no longer recognizable, even by her father. The body was identified definitively by dental records. Her face had been peeled off in small strips. The forensic evidence revealed that she was still able to bleed and struggle during most of the time that was done to her.

The next sign of the Catastrophe was another unrecognizable body. This time, of a 6-year-old boy of a US diplomat. The injuries were the same. The CIA concluded that the murderer was the same man. The next sign was an 11-year-old child of a US school teacher in Africa. She was divorced and her husband had once worked for the US State Department. Perhaps he had been CIA under diplomatic cover, but the CIA refused to comment.

I saw the photographs of the dead bodies. They were too horrible for words. Could it be that I was recalled to the CIA against my will in order to get my special operational skills to track down the villain? The day I got back to the CIA, the first thing Tenet did was hand me these pictures and ask me to find The Killer. He had given me the pictures of 23 victims who had all died the same way. All
of them were children of people who could have been in the CIA. About 22 of them did have a
known parent or guardian in the CIA.

DEATHS DUE TO THE STEALING OF A CIA COMPUTER
What he failed to tell me, or give me the photos for, for was the over 100 adults that had been killed using the exact same modus operandi. One of them was in the CIA’s morgue at that moment [Editor: did you know that the CIA has its own morgue? I didn’t]. ..The item that was stolen from the CIA that was responsible for those deaths was a computer. That computer had not gone through the hands of one of the ex-CIA operatives. Its contents not been thoroughly erased.

It took work and time to do that; the disc had to be erased and written over 50 times. Halliburton’s bosses did not care about national security or the risk to the CIA’s covert operatives, if they were exposed… I was able to prove that it was the same computer. It still had the CIA’s personnel files on it and many of the victims had been selectively deleted from where they should have been in that list. When I then compared that file to the CIA’s current personnel file, the comparison program marked those deletions in red. The selective deletions showed that the owner of the computer was getting tipped off by someone high up in the investigation of the deaths inside the CIA.

The US Administration managed to suppress the news of these murders almost completely, after its ties to the computer started showing up in the CIA’s internal investigations. No-one in the media had connected the isolated cases across the globe [another gross failure by the incompetent and controlled Fourth Estate, which has intelligence cadres sitting in its press rooms: Ed.].

The motivation of the deletions was obviously to try to cover-up the guilt of the owner’s role in those murders. There were about 86 deletions in a file of thousands of names. Each deletion was a victim, as already known by the CIA up to a certain date about two weeks earlier.

ENTER THE ‘DARK LORDS’: DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO BUSH
No victim that the CIA had on its investigation list by that point had failed to be deleted on that stolen computer. The odds of that happening by chance alone was practically speaking, exactly zero. In addition, I later obtained evidence that firmly tied the secondary ownership of that same computer to those who committed the actual tortures and murders. There was many more than one murderer. What they had in common was membership in a kind of paramilitary, quasi-religious cult. The members of that paramilitary cult had a group commitment to kill a person once a month. The Mafia usually only requires its members to kill once to get into it. This satanic group required their members to kill once a month in order to remain in good standing in it.

[Note: The Editor of this service received, between February and mid-May 2008, a large number of evil, unsolicited phone calls from a contrived, deep demonic ‘voice’ referencing ‘the Great Dark Lords’. This harassment [referenced in our report dated 27th April 2010, as the stupid harassment resumed: we have identified the operative concerned as Wanta] continued until shortly after we reported the matter to the head of the US Anti-Terrorism Task Force and also, separately, to law enforcement personnel in contact with the Editor’s own contacts, whereupon they ceased. We have voice recordings of almost all these calls.

Considered in the context of what follows, it would appear that these calls represented threats: one of these was quite specific, along the lines of ‘we have the means of dealing with you’. Given the appearance of the ‘Dark Lords’ in this ‘Cheney’ context, it is likely that the Unterreichsführer’s apparat will indeed, as we suspected, have been responsible for these multiple telephone threats and harassment calls.

It comes as NO SURPRISE whatsoever to the Editor that the veteran CIA investigator came across this ‘Black’ dimension. The harassment calls to the Editor were also interspersed with threatening emails. The content of one of these, containing a very grave threat, was conveyed immediately as referenced above, with the consequence that (at the date of this posting) the harassment ceased].

A Manual on ‘How to Please the Lords of Darkness’ had been published by a member of that cult. It recommended that the best way to do it was to torture people to death using the modus operandi that I have indicated above. That Manual had been distributed by the owner of the aforementioned computer with that CIA Personnel file suggested as the targets. The man who bought the computer was indeed a paramilitary type, with a large collection of weapons, many of them unregistered… He was identified as a fundraiser for Bush.

The literature of the group showed upside-down crosses as an emblem [satanic symbolism: Ed.]. The reason that others in the CIA had not tracked him down and had failed to pin the instigating of the murders on him, was political. Like ‘HallCIA’, and the Head Programmer from our earlier cases, he was well protected. It was not that CIA investigators had not suspected him. It was that they did not know what to do with their suspicions and even their evidence after they got it.

I was the booby prize winner: the fool at the CIA who had before been willing to buck the silence at great risk to myself. There was precedence for giving me a job like this. At one point, a CIA officer had sold a list of MI6 officers to the KGB during the Cold War. The KBG had started killing them off. I was given the job to stop them from continuing. And they had stopped: whether or not it was due to my efforts, was a matter of hot debate within the CIA. But some people credited me with having had some influence in the matter.

The individual who bought that computer was apparently a friend of Cheney and Bush; they had invited him to the White House. They had been present when he picked it out among a number of other CIA stolen computers, paying cash, which Cheney had put in his pocket.

‘CHENEY & BUSH TOOK THE MONEY FOR THE COMPUTERS USED FOR THE MURDERS’
I found the White House Security camera footage of that event. The GAO has a copy of it. The payment is shown on the video. The man took hundred dollar bill(s) out of his pocket and handed that to Bush. Bush hesitated and then handed the money to Cheney. The footage of that computer being carried out of the room by a guard follows about 20 minutes later. The room had about 20 computers from the CIA in it, to start with. [They were all neatly laid out, as at a corporate sales demonstration, for buyers to examine, test, select, and pay for: only cash was accepted: Ed.].

The security camera tape shows Bush Jr. and Mr Cheney repeatedly coming into the room with a prospective buyer and taking cash in varying amounts. That continued until all the computers were gone. Some prospective buyers remained in the room for over an hour exploring the contents of the stolen CIA computers, before deciding on a purchase. I checked with the CIA and found that no CIA vetting of those buyers had occurred. Most did not have security clearances. Some of them had prior felony convictions and had been allowed into the White House ‘on orders from above’. The sale was ‘by invitation only’, with Bush and Cheney controlling the invitation list.

The earlier tape shows Cheney directing Halliburton employees in where to set the computers up. Much care and time was taken to plug them in and connect them to monitors, mice, keyboards, and to arrange the room nicely with a mouse pad under each mouse. The GAO has a copy of that tape too. The manual on how to torture people (in the manner described) and the file of CIA Personnel was sent overseas and domestically through the mail whenever a buyer purchased a snuff film from that man. His poorly kept records showed that he had mailed out at least 2,000 such CDs with the Manual on ‘How to please the Lords of Darkness’.

His records omitted the addresses that he sent them to in about 50% of the cases where he marked payment received and product and ‘How-to’ sent. Thirty of the murders had been solved already by local foreign authorities by the time I was given the case. Of those, the ‘How-to’ CD was found in 28 of them. Presumably it had been overlooked in the other two, or the wrong party may have been charged, or the ‘How-to’ thrown out by the ‘Black’ criminal operative.

Unfortunately, the murders had continued after those arrests.

BUSH AND CHENEY RESPONSIBLE FOR 168 CIA DEATHS, COVERED UP (HITHERTO)
At least 168 CIA officers and their family members were brutally tortured to death as a direct result of this cynical corruption run by Bush and Cheney. The CIA [systematically] covered it all up and pretended that it never happened on Tenet’s orders. The notorious traitor Aldrich Ames had not
sent out instructions to torture and kill anyone. He had sold ONE copy of a list of CIA operatives
in one country to one buyer. He is languishing in prison for life.

[The perpetrator identified here] sent out over 2,000 copies of all the names and addresses of the CIA officers and their families in every country. He had sent them out with hate propaganda and incited others to kill them. He had sent this [Nazi filth] to people who were known murderers who had a commitment to kill again. And he had sent it out as a challenge: are you man enough to kill a CIA person? His group offered ‘Advanced Membership Privileges’ to anyone who succeeded.

It was very curious that someone close and high up in the investigations at the CIA was tipping him off, since he was targeting CIA officers. I was able to supply the GAO with the evidence as to who was doing it. This person was getting calls and faxes directly from Cheney and Tenet. Tenet’s faxes included the names of the victims to date. He was being assisted in his cover-up at a very high US level. I investigated whether the Russians or another foreign group had put him up to this, as his methods seemed too effective to be that of an individual’ alone.

HALLIBURTON LINKED TO THESE MURDERS OF CIA PERSONNEL
I found no such evidence of a foreign government or its operatives being behind it [but] I found many ties to US underworld organizations. Most of the ties, however, were directly to Halliburton. According to Halliburton’s records which I sent the GAO, [the perpetrator of these incitements to murder CIA personnel] had headed one of their subsidiaries before it went bankrupt.

CIA INVESTIGATOR TOLD TO ‘BACK OFF, OR ELSE’
When I looked up that old corporation I did not find a building on the aerial to correspond to the address. That subsidiary had been selling intelligence and paramilitary gear. It had specialized in recruiting mercenaries worldwide. It made me wonder if those killing the CIA had done so, as a kind of recruitment test; those getting away with it and being able to prove it, getting the job. I started looking into whether he was on Halliburton’s books as CEO of a new subsidiary. Just as soon as I started that investigation, Cheney called and told me to ‘back off or else’.

I asked him what the ‘else’ referred to, because it certainly sounded like a death threat to me. He hung up on me. Then he called me back about 10 minutes later and offered to set up a face-to-face meeting with that computer owner. I agreed and asked at once for a time and a place. He hung up: apparently his offer was just to threaten me that he would [impose] that man on me. I sent copies of those calls to the GAO also. They should still have them. The Halliburton mercenary recruiter [who incited the murders] was never prosecuted. Cheney and Bush would not allow it.

BIO-FEEDBACK EQUIPMENT STOLEN BY HALLIBURTON FOR THE RUSSIANS
In about May 2002, a Halliburton person at the CIA had stolen an expensive piece of equipment.
It was an ultra-sophisticated CIA bio-feedback machine that was worth over $5 million.

It had required hundreds of millions of dollars of R & D money for the CIA to develop it. It was custom-made only for the CIA. Its only purpose was to train operatives how to pass a lie detector test. It was only used when they were to be sent on extremely dangerous missions to places like Russia. And it was only used in very critical missions.

There was a high risk that Russian intelligence would figure out how to overcome that training, if they interrogated about five operatives who had used it. That is, if they realised that those 5 had been trained in that fashion. Thus it was TOP SECRET and its manual was also top secret at the time. Loss of that machine and its Manual was the same as potentially losing every secret a given CIA official had in his or her mind when they were in Russia. The head of the CIA station in Russia had been trained on that machine for obvious reasons.

The effect of the training was to give the user control over their automatic nervous system. That meant that they could stop their fear, their sweating, their heart rate increase etc. in response to an interrogation. In addition to those obvious advantages in an interrogation situation, it had a big psychological benefit. It gave those who had used it confidence that they could pass a lie detector test. Thus, they were as if ‘bullet proofed’ against threats and lie detector tests.

Although the signal-to-noise ratio relating to information obtained under torture is so low as to be unusable, that is not true in a ‘friendly’ interrogation. The British had admirably demonstrated the effectiveness of ‘friendly interrogations’ in WWII. An operative who had fear or fear of a lie detector test was more likely to ‘tell all’ in a ‘friendly interrogation’ because of underlying anxiety. I did not find out about that theft until the next day. I then learned from a Halliburton person that it had been stolen and was en route to the Russian Embassy to be sold to them. I was absolutely horrified by the national security implications of that. I rushed up to Tenet’s office to tell him. He already knew.

Cheney had called him and asked him what it was and what it was worth to the Russians. This was after I had set up the system for things to go through Alan so that the oversight committee could intervene to stop the worst violations of national security.

But the thief was a personal friend of Cheney’s and had taken the item straight to the White House to ask him if he wanted to buy it. Cheney had paid him $50,000 for it, he informed me. The copy of the telephone call that I sent to the GAO between Tenet and Cheney showed that Mr Cheney had considered keeping it, so that he could pass lie detector tests.

CHENEY THREATENS TO KILL THE VETERAN CIA OPERATIVE PERSONALLY
They had discussed it and Tenet had promised to find out more about it, how it worked, and how much it was ‘worth outside of the CIA’. He had called him back and told him a figure of $1.2 million. Cheney asked him to find out what was his risk of needing the machine himself. Tenet called him back and said that CIA analysts judged his risk to be about 4%. In front of Tenet with his phone on
speaker, I called Cheney and demanded its return.

He laughed and said, ‘What’s the big deal? It can only be used 5 times total and it has already been used once. We should sell it while it still has value before those 5 times are up’. He had absolutely no understanding of intelligence matters. It was not 5 uses of the machine: it was 5 times a CIA person trained using that machine was interrogated by the Russians. It could be 20 years’ worth of use to prevent the loss of security codes, national secrets, and how a CIA station was operating.

I explained it all quite carefully as Cheney is not a technically minded person. I even asked him questions to make certain that he had understood what I said correctly [Editor: This interesting comment suggests that Cheney is actually not that bright, which may also be judged to be the case, given his behaviour over the Settlements and his repeated thefts of gigantic sums of money. It may be that he progressed to these much larger thefts after getting away with multiple lesser thefts of which examples have been given in this narrative]. Cheney then said: ‘Well, what difference does it make since there are remote viewers like you in Russia who can steal the secrets anyway?’

I then explained that remote viewers were not 100% accurate and that intelligence agencies always had to verify what they said using hard data. Lie detector tests are not 100% accurate either, but they add some signal-to-noise benefit. Mr Cheney replied that torture was generally worthless in getting information [Editor: Amazing! Was not Cheney reported to be adamant that torture MUST be used to extract intelligence from terrorists and from prisoners in US hell holes like Gantanamo and Abu Ghraib?]. That was true. But it was still wrong to sell the Russians the CIA’s very best and most advanced equipment to deter loss of information under interrogation. ‘Friendly interrogations’ do yield valid intelligence.

When I pointed that out, Cheney said that the machine had already been sold to the Russians and that I was too late. I told him that I would figure out some way of prosecuting him, if he ever did that again. He laughed and said, ‘You haven’t got a chance’. I told him that I would try.

Cheney then said: ‘I will kill you myself, if you ever get close to succeeding’.

As we have said before, Cheney is what Malachi Martin would have called ‘perfectly possessed’.

RUSSIA TREATED AS ‘THE ENEMY’ THROUGHOUT: RAPPROCHEMENT IS THEREFORE FALSE
You will have noticed that during the timeframe of this narrative [2002-2005-ish], Russia is considered in this dialogue to be an enemy, just as was the case during the overt Cold War.

This reflects the fact that the dialectical breach created by Lenin’s Revolution and its aftermath has not, in fact, been healed or discarded: exactly as the Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn advised the disinterested CIA: see The Perestroika Deception by Anatoliy Golitsyn, edited by Christopher Story, available from the books [Edward Harle Limited] segment of this website.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
(3): Reproduced from our report dated 2nd May 2010 [Archive]:

THE TEXT OF MR HENRY A. WAXMAN’S LETTER TO MR DAVID J. LESAR, C.E.O. OF HALLIBURTON CO., DATED 30TH APRIL 2010, DEMANDING ALL DOCUMENTS.

HENRY A. WAXMAN, CALIFORNIA, CHAIRMAN
JOE BARTON, TEXAS, RANKING MEMBER
COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE
Congress of the United States
House of Representatives
2125 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515-6115

Majority: (202) 225 2927
Minority: (202) 225 3641

April 30, 2010-05-04

Mr David J. Lesar
Halliburton Co.
US Corporate Headquarters
3000 North Sam Houston Parkway East
Houston, Texas 77032

Dear Mr Lesar

According to a report in The Wall Street Journal today, one possible cause of the explosion that destroyed the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig and led to the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico could be a problem with the cementing that was supposed to seal the well. In this procedure, cement is used to plug the well and to fill gaps between the well pipe and the hole drilled into the ocean floor in order to prevent combustible oil and gas from escaping.

Problems with the cementing process have frequently been identified as causes of oil well blowouts. The article quoted one independent expert who said: “The initial likely cause of gas coming to the surface had something to do with the cement” (1). Halliburton Co. provided cementing services for the Deepwater Horizon rig.

As part of the Committee’s investigation into the cause of the oil spill, we ask that you take three steps. First, we request that you arrange a briefing on May 5, 2010, for the Committee staff with Halliburton officials knowledgeable about Halliburton’s cementing activities at the Deepwater Horizon oil rig.

Second, we ask you to provide the Committee with all documents in Halliburton’s possession relating to (1) the explosion at the Deepwater Horizon rig; (2) the possibility or risk of an explosion or blowout at the Deepwater Horizon rig; and (3) the status, adequacy, quality, monitoring, and inspection of the cementing work relating to the Deepwater Horizon rig.

We request that you provide these documents on May 7, 2010. An attachment to this letter provides additional information on how to respond to Committee document requests.

Third, we ask that you preserve for potential future production to the Committee all documents relating to Halliburton’s operations at and involvement with the Deepwater Horizon rig.

We appreciate your assistance with the Committee’s investigation. We believe it is essential that the spill and its causes are thoroughly investigated. If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact Meredith Fuchs of the Committee staff at (202) 226-2424.

Sincerely,

[Signed]
Henry A. Waxman, Chairman

[Signed]
Bart Stupak
Chairman, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations

Enclosure.

cc. The Honorable Joe Barton, Ranking Member
The Honorable Michael Burgess, Ranking Member,
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.

(1) Drilling Process Attracts Scrutiny in Rig Explosion, The Wall Street Journal, April 30, 2010.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
(4): Text of the Memorial Notice for John Hemenway Jr,
reproduced from our report dated 2nd May 2010 [Archive]:

HEMENWAY: JOHN MARTIN HEMENWAY (Age 47) On April 30, 2010 of Bedford, VA. Beloved husband of 7 years to Stephanie; loving father of Andrew Branham Hemenway; devoted son of John and Betty Hemenway; beloved brother of Catherine and Edward Siewick, Jane and John Sullivan, David and Margaret Hemenway and Fielding Williams. Pre-deceased by his beloved sister Mary Joyce Hemenway Williams. Also survived by many loving nieces, nephews, relatives and friends.

Memorial Service on Tuesday, May 4, at 4:30 p.m. at Otterville United Methodist Church, Bedford, VA. In lieu of flowers memorials may be made to the John M. Hemenway Camp CHILD Scholarship for special needs children c/o Bedford Primary School, 807 College Street, Bedford, VA 24523.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
(5): ‘Thirty Days: Hitler’s Thirty Days to Power: January 1933’, Henry Ashby Turner, Jr., Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, New York etc., 1996, ISBN 0-201-40714-0, page 164. ‘Coup d’état by installments’, precisely accurate characterization of pan-German power-grabbing methodology. Konrad Heiden, Der Fuehrer, Boston, MA, 1944, page 597.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
THE FOLLOWING DATA HAS BEEN PUBLISHED AT THE FOOT OF MOST OF THESE REPORTS FOR THE PAST THREE YEARS++: COMPILED BY U.S. SECURITIES EXPERT MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S..

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
NOTICES:

BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time AMENDING AND INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE. In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

TEXT OF THE S.E.C.’S COMPLAINT AGAINST GOLDMAN SACHS

cropped-chrisstory

PROSPECTS FOR GOLDMAN ARE DEVASTATING AND COULD LEAD TO ITS COLLAPSE

Sunday 18 April 2010 17:57

• IMPLICATIONS OF THE S.E.C.’S CIVIL COMPLAINT AGAINST GOLDMAN SACHS & CO.

• THE S.E.C.’S PRESS RELEASE RE. ITS COMPLAINT AGAINST GOLDMAN SACHS

• TEXT OF THE S.E.C.’S CIVIL COMPLAINT AGAINST GOLDMAN SACHS & CO.

• READ WITH THE ‘SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL’ REPORT: ALSO DATED 18TH APRIL 2010

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

• AS PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED, OUR LANDLINES REMAIN CLOSED BECAUSE OF UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT. WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL OR THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

IMPLICATIONS OF THE S.E.C.’S CIVIL COMPLAINT AGAINST GOLDMAN SACHS & CO.
We publish below the text of the Complaint lodged by the Securities and Exchange Commission against Goldman Sachs and Co. and a Goldman employee, Fabrice Tourre, filed with the United States Court for the Southern District of New York, on Friday 16th April 2010. This is only the first devastating development which could lead to the collapse of this institution.

• Other entities that have been engaged in similar activities are cruising for a similar bruising.

It is important to note as follows:

(1): This case PRECISELY illustrates, in many exact parallels, the accuracy of the report also dated 18th April 2010 confirming that SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL.

(2): Specifically, this complaint reveals an ongoing alleged pattern of Fraud in the Inducement, misrepresentation of fact, an intent to deceive targeted against domestic and foreign institutional investors, a conspiracy to procure profits through deception, mail fraud, wire fraud and a general environment of Fraudulent Finance, as specifically exposed for several years by this service.

(3): See in particular: International Currency Review, First Quarter 2009 [Volume 34, Number 2], on Systemic Fraudulent Finance and the de facto (illegitimate) legitimisation of financial corruption through the operation by racketeering money institutions specialising in Fraudulent Finance of sophisticated in Ponzi schemes; edited by your correspondent:

• Architecture of the Corrupt Money Machine:
The Legalisation of Financial Corruption: featuring: the Creation of Securitisation and Credit Default Swaps: Analysis by the US securities expert, Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S.

• Description of the resulting derivative Financial Frauds and Scams, WITH FLOW CHARTS showing how it’s done: Analysis by the US securities expert, Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S.

• Glossary of Exotic Derivatives Market Terminology compiled
by the US securities expert, Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S.

With appendices.

(4): The Complaint has to deal with the material issues that presuppose a likely conviction, and so SIDESTEPS the central issue exposed by the ‘securitisation is illegal’ report, which is simply that THIS ACTIVITY IS ILLEGAL.

Paragraph 73 of the Complaint [see below] alleges that the defendants, ‘in connection with the purchase or sale of securities or securities-based swap agreements, by the use of means or instrumentalities of interstate commerce or of the mails, directly or indirectly (a) employed devices, schemes or artifices to defraud; (b) made untrue statements of material facts or omissions of material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) engaged in transactions, practices or courses of business which operated or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon persons’.

(5): A German bank based in Düsseldorf, IKB Deutsche lndustriebank AG (“IKB”), lost about $150 million as a result of this alleged scam. Altogether, investors in the liabilities of ABACUS are alleged to have lost more than $1 billion.

(6): A Civil case is in fact far more prospectively devastating than a criminal case (given that the SEC is dealing with institutions as well as one individual employee to start with), because:

• The case will be decided on the basis of the PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE.

• Scope arises for R.I.C.O. actions providing for awards of three times damages.

• Following conviction, the victims can sue Goldman under R.I.C.O. (three times damages).

• Following conviction, the victims of the victims can sue the first layer of victims, Goldman and the other participants as appropriate under R.I.C.O. (three times damages).

• Individual Directors, executives, securities personnel and those involved in decision-making both within Goldman Sachs & Co. and at other involved institutions, can prospectively be charged individually and severally with fraud.

• The ultimate outcome is that Goldman could be in court for the next 20 years, except that, realistically, it will in all probability cease to exist.

(7): We were authoritatively advised on Saturday 17th April 2010 that this SEC Complaint against Goldman Sachs & Co. and a named Goldman employee was specifically triggered as a DIRECT consequence of the Complaint against the Securities and Exchange Commission and individually and severally against current and former SEC officials filed by the lawyers for the CMKX victims, Hodges and Associates, of Pasadena, CA, in January [see our report dated 9th January 2010] claiming $3.87 trillion following the floating of 2.25 trillion of phantom shares.

Service of that complaint was accepted by the SEC’s Office of General Counsel both on behalf of the SEC and of current officers, while former SEC officers accepted service and had to arrange their own legal representation.

THE S.E.C.’S PRESS RELEASE RE. ITS COMPLAINT AGAINST GOLDMAN SACHS
SEC Charges Goldman Sachs With Fraud in Structuring and Marketing
of CDO Tied to Subprime Mortgages

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 2010-59

Washington, D.C., April 16, 2010 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Goldman, Sachs & Co. and one of its vice presidents for defrauding investors by misstating and omitting key facts about a financial product tied to subprime mortgages as the U.S. housing market was beginning to falter.

Goldman Sachs structured and marketed a synthetic collateralized debt obligation (CDO) that hinged on the performance of subprime residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS). Goldman Sachs failed to disclose to investors vital information about the CDO, in particular the role that a major hedge fund played in the portfolio selection process and the fact that the hedge fund had taken a short position against the CDO.

“The product was new and complex but the deception and conflicts are old and simple”, said Robert Khuzami, Director of the Division of Enforcement. “Goldman wrongly permitted a client that was betting against the mortgage market to heavily influence which mortgage securities to include in an investment portfolio, while telling other investors that the securities were selected by an independent, objective third party”.

Kenneth Lench, Chief of the SEC’s Structured and New Products Unit, added:

“The SEC continues to investigate the practices of investment banks and others involved in the securitization of complex financial products tied to the U.S. housing market as it was beginning to show signs of distress”.

The SEC alleges that one of the world’s largest hedge funds, Paulson & Co., paid Goldman Sachs
to structure a transaction in which Paulson & Co. could take short positions against mortgage securities chosen by Paulson & Co. based on a belief that the securities would experience credit events.

According to the SEC’s complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the marketing materials for the CDO known as ABACUS 2007-AC1 (ABACUS) all represented that the RMBS portfolio underlying the CDO was selected by ACA Management LLC (ACA), a third party with expertise in analyzing credit risk in RMBS.

The SEC alleges that undisclosed in the marketing materials and unbeknownst to investors, the Paulson & Co. hedge fund, which was poised to benefit if the RMBS defaulted, played a significant role in selecting which RMBS should make up the portfolio.

The SEC’s complaint alleges that after participating in the portfolio selection, Paulson & Co. effectively shorted the RMBS portfolio it helped select by entering into credit default swaps (CDS) with Goldman Sachs to buy protection on specific layers of the ABACUS capital structure. Given that financial short interest, Paulson & Company had an economic incentive to select RMBS that it expected to experience credit events in the near future. Goldman Sachs did not disclose Paulson & Co.’s short position or its role in the collateral selection process in the term sheet, flip book, offering memorandum, or other marketing materials provided to investors.

The SEC alleges that Goldman Sachs Vice President Fabrice Tourre was principally responsible for ABACUS 2007-AC1. Mr Tourre structured the transaction, prepared the marketing materials, and communicated directly with investors. Tourre allegedly knew of Paulson & Co.’s undisclosed short interest and role in the collateral selection process. In addition, he misled ACA into believing that Paulson & Co. invested approximately $200 million in the equity of ABACUS, indicating that Paulson & Co.’s interests in the collateral selection process were closely aligned with ACA’s interests. In reality, however, their interests were sharply conflicting.

According to the SEC’s complaint, the deal closed on April 26, 2007, and Paulson & Co. paid Goldman Sachs approximately $15 million for structuring and marketing ABACUS. By Oct. 24, 2007, 83 percent of the RMBS in the ABACUS portfolio had been downgraded and 17 percent were on negative watch. By Jan. 29, 2008, 99 percent of the portfolio had been downgraded.

Investors in the liabilities of ABACUS are alleged to have lost more than $1 billion.

The SEC’s complaint charges Goldman Sachs and Tourre with violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5. The Commission seeks injunctive relief, disgorgement of profits, prejudgment interest, and financial penalties.

For more information about this enforcement action, contact:
Lorin L. Reisner
Deputy Director, SEC Enforcement Division
(202) 551-4787.

Kenneth R. Lench
Chief, Structured and New Products Unit, SEC Enforcement Division
(202) 551-4938.

Reid A. Muoio
Deputy Chief, Structured and New Products Unit, SEC Enforcement Division
(202) 551-4488

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2010/2010-59.htm

TEXT OF THE S.E.C.’S CIVIL COMPLAINT AGAINST GOLDMAN SACHS & CO.:

UNITED STATES COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff

v.

GOLDMAN SACHS & CO and FABRICE TOURRE, Defendants.

COMPLAINT
[Securities Fraud]

10-CV-3229

ECF CASE

Jury Trial Demanded

Plaintiff, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) alleges as follows against the defendants named above.

OVERVIEW

1. The Commission brings this securities fraud action against Goldman, Sachs & Co. (“GS&Co”) and a GS&Co employee, Frabrice Tourre (“Tourre”), for making materially misleading statements and omissions in connection with a synthetic collateralized debt obligation (“CDO”) GS&Co structured and marketed to investors.

This synthetic CDO, ABACUS 2007-AC1, was tied to the performance of subprime residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) and was structured and marketed by GS&Co in early 2007 when the United States housing market and related securities were beginning to show signs of distress. Synthetic CDOs like ABACUS 2007-AC1 contributed to the recent financial crisis by magnifying losses associated with the downturn in the United States housing market.

2. GS&Co marketing materials for ABACUS 2007-AC1 – including the term sheet, flip book and offering memorandum for the CDO – all represented that the reference portfolio of residential mortgage-backed securitiesunderlying the CDO was selected by ACA Management LLC (“AC.A.”), a third-party with experience analyzing credit risk in RMBS. Undisclosed in the marketing materials and unbeknownst to investors, a large hedge fund, Paulson & Co. Inc. (“Paulson”), with economic interests directly adverse to investors in the ABACUS 2007-AC1 CDO, played a significant role in the portfolio selection process.

After participating in the selection of the reference portfolio, Paulson effectively shorted the residential mortgage-backed securities portfolio it helped select by entering into credit default swaps (“CDS”) with GS&Co to buy protection on specific layers of the ABACUS 2007-AC1 capital structure. Given its financial short interest, Paulson had an economic incentive to choose RMBS that it expected to experience credit events in the near future, GS&Co did not disclose Paulson’s adverse economic interests or its role in the portfolio selection process in the term sheet, flip book, offering memorandum or other marketing materials provided to investors.

3. In sum, GS&Co arranged a transaction at Paulson’s request in which Paulson heavily influenced the selection of the portfolio to suit its economic interests, but failed to disclose to investors, as part of the description of the portfolio selection process contained in the marketing materials used to promote the transaction, Paulson’s role in the portfolio selection process or its adverse economic interests.

4. Tourre was principally responsible for ABACUS 2007-AC1. Tourre devised the transaction, prepared the marketing materials and communicated directly with investors. Tourre knew of Paulson’s undisclosed short interest and its role in the collateral selection process. Tourre also misled ACA into believing that Paulson invested approximately $200 million in the equity of ABACUS 2007-AC1 (a long position) and, accordingly, that Paulson’s interests in the collateral section process were aligned with ACA’s when in reality Paulson’s interests were sharply conflicting.

5. The deal closed on April 26,2007. Paulson paid GS&Co approximately $15 million for structuring and marketing ABACUS 2007-AC1. By October 24, 2007, 83% of the RMBS in the ABACUS 2007-AC1 portfolio had been downgraded and 17% were on negative watch. By January 29, 2008, 99% of the portfolio had been downgraded. As a result, investors in the ABACUS 2007-AC1 CDO lost over $l billion. Paulson’s opposite CDS positions yielded
a profit of approximately $l billion for Paulson.

6. By engaging in the misconduct described herein, GS&Co and Tourre directly or indirectly engaged in transactions, acts, practices and a course of business that violated Section 17(a) of
the Securities Act of l933, 15 U.S.C. §77q(a) (“the Securities Act”), Section l0(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §78j(b) (“the Exchange Act”) and Exchange Act Rule l0b-5, 17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5. The Commission seeks injunctive relief, disgorgement of profits, prejudgment interest, civil penalties and other appropriate and necessary equitable relief from both defendants.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

7. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to Sections 2l(d), 21(e), and 27 of the Exchange Act [l5 U.S.C. §§ 78u(d), 78u(e), and 78aa]. Each defendant directly or indirectly, made use of the means or instruments of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or the facilities of a national securities exchange in connection with the transactions, acts, practices, and courses of business alleged herein. Certain of the acts, practices, and courses of conduct constituting the violations of law alleged herein occurred within this judicial district.

DEFENDANTS

8. Goldman, Sachs & Co. is the principal United States broker-dealer of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., a global investment banking, securities and investment management firm headquartered in New York City. GS&Co structured and marketed ABACUS 2OO7-AC1.

9. Fabrice Tourre, age 31, is a registered representative with GS&Co. Tourre was the GS&Co employee principally responsible for the structuring and marketing of ABACUS 2007-AC1, Tourre worked as a Vice President on the structured product correlation trading desk at GS&Co headquarters in New York City during the relevant period.

Tourre presently works in London as an Executive Director of Goldman Sachs lnternational.

FACTS

A. GS&CO’S CORRELATTON TRADING DESK

10. GS&Co’s structured product correlation hading desk was created in and around late 2004/early 2005. Among the services it provided was the structuring and marketing of a series of synthetic CDOs called “ABACUS” whose performance was tied to RMBS. GS&Co sought to protect and to expand this profitable franchise in a competitive market throughout the relevant period. According to an internal GS&Co memorandum to the Goldman Sachs

Mortgage Capital Committee (“MCC”) dated March 12, 2007, the “ability to structure and execute complicated transactions to meet multiple clients’ needs and objectives is key for our franchise”, and “[e]xecuting this transaction [ABACUS 2007-AC1] and others like it helps position Goldman to compete more aggressively in the growing market for synthetics written on structured products”.

B. PAULSON’S INVESTMENT STRATEGY

11. Paulson & Co. Inc. (“Paulson”) is a hedge fund founded in 1994. Beginning in 2006, Paulson created two funds, known as the Paulson Credit Opportunity Funds, which took a bearish view on subprime mortgage loans by buying protection through CDS on various debt securities.

A CDS is an over-the-counter derivative contract under which a protection buyer makes periodic premium payments and the protection seller makes a contingent payment if a reference obligation experiences a credit event.

12. RMBS are securities backed by residential mortgages. Investors receive payments out of the interest and principal on the underlying mortgages. Paulson developed an investment strategy based upon the belief that, for a variety of reasons, certain mid-and-subprime RMBS rated “Triple B”, meaning bonds rated “BBB” by S&P or “Baa2” by Moody’s, would experience credit events.

The Triple B tranche is the lowest investment grade RMBS and, after equity, the first part of the capital structure to experience losses associated with a deterioration of the underlying mortgage loan portfolio.

13. CDOs are debt securities collateralized by debt obligations including RMBS. These securities are packaged and generally held by a special purpose vehicle (“SPV”) that issues notes entitling their holders to payments derived from the underlying assets. In a synthetic CDO, the SPV does not actually own a portfolio of fixed income assets, but rather enters into CDSs that reference the performance of a portfolio (the SPV does hold some collateral securities separate from the reference portfolio that it uses to make payment obligations).

14. Paulson came to believe that synthetic CDOs whose reference assets consisted of certain Triple B-rated mid-and-subprime RMBS would experience significant losses and, under certain circumstances, even the more senior AAA-rated tranches of these so-called “mezzanine” CDOs would become worthless.

C. GS&CO AND PAULSON DISCUSS A PROPOSED TRANSACTION

15. Paulson performed an analysis of recent-vintage Triple B-rated RMBS and identified various bonds it expected to experience credit events. Paulson then asked GS&Co to help it to purchase protection, through the use of CDS, on the RMBS it had adversely selected, meaning chosen in the belief that the bonds would experience credit events’

16. Paulson discussed with GS&Co possible transactions in which counterparties to its short positions might be found. Among the transactions considered were synthetic CDOs whose performance was tied to Triple B-rated RMBS.

Paulson discussed with GS&Co the creation of a CDO that would allow Paulson to participate in selecting a portfolio of reference obligations and then effectively short the RMBS portfolio it helped select by entering into CDS with GS&Co to buy protection on specific layers of the synthetic CDO’s capital structure.

17. A Paulson employee explained the investment opportunity as of January 2007 as follows:

“It is true that the market is not pricing the subprime RMBS wipeout scenario.

In my opinion this situation is due to the fact that rating agencies, CDO managers and underwriters have all the incentives to keep the game going, while ‘real money’ investors have neither the analytical tools nor the institutional framework to take action before the losses that one could
anticipate based [on] the ‘news’ available everywhere are actually realized”.

18. At the same time, GS&Co recognized that market conditions were presenting challenges to the successful marketing of CDO transactions backed by mortgage-related securities.

For example, portions of an email in French and English sent by Tourre to a friend on January 23, 2007 stated, in English translation where applicable:

‘More and more leverage in the system, The whole building is about to collapse anytime now. Only potential survivor, the fabulous Fab[rice Tourre]… standing in the middle of all these complex, highly leveraged, exotic trades he created without necessarily understanding all of the implications of those monstrosities!!!”

Similarly, an email on February 11, 2OO7 to Tourre from the head of the GS&Co shuctured product correlation trading desk stated in part, “the CDO biz is dead we don’t have a lot of time Ieft”.

D. INTRODUCTION OF ACA TO THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION

19. GS&Co and Tourre knew that it would be difficult, if not impossible, to place the liabilities of a synthetic CDO if they disclosed to investors that a short investor, such as Paulson, played a significant role in the collateral selection process.

By contrast, they knew that the identification of an experienced and independent third-party collateral manager as having selected the portfolio would facilitate the placement of the CDO liabilities in a market that was beginning to show signs of distress.

20. GS&Co also knew that at least one significant potential investor, IKB Deutsche lndustriebank AG (“IKB”), was unlikely to invest in the liabilities of a CDO that did not utilize a collateral manager to analyze and select the reference portfolio.

21. GS&Co therefore sought a collateral manager to play a role in the transaction proposed by Paulson. Contemporaneous internal correspondence reflects that GS&Co recognized that not every collateral manager would “agree to the type of names [of RMBS] Paulson want[s] to use” and put its “name at risk…on a weak quality portfolio”.

22. In or about January 2007, GS&Co approached ACA and proposed that it serve as the “Portfolio Selection Agent” for a CDO transaction sponsored by Paulson. ACA previously had constructed and managed numerous CDOs for a fee.

As of December 31, 2006, ACA had closed on 22 CDO transactions with underlying portfolios consisting of $15.7 billion of assets.

23. Internal GS&Co communications emphasized the advantages from a marketing perspective of having ACA associated with the transaction. For example, an internal email from Tourre dated February 7,20A7 , stated:

“One thing that we need to make sure ACA understands is that we want their name on this transaction. This is a transaction for which they are acting as portfolio selection agent, this will be important that we can use ACA’s branding to help distribute the bonds”.

24. Likewise, an internal GS&Co memorandum to the Goldman Sachs MCC dated March 12, 2007 described the marketing advantages of ACA’s “brand-name” and “credibility”:

“We expect the strong brand-name of ACA as well as our market-leading position in synthetic CDOs of structured products to result in a successful offering.”

“We expect that the role of ACA as Portfolio Selection Agent will broaden the investor base for this and future ABACUS offerings. We intend to target suitable structured product investors who have previously participated in ACA-managed cashflow CDO transactions or who have previously participated in prior ABACUS transactions. We expect to leverage ACA’s credibility and franchise to help distribute this Transaction”.

E. PAULSON’S PARTICIPATION IN THE COLLATERAL SELECTION PROCESS

25. In late 2006 and early 2407, Paulson performed an analysis of recent-vintage Triple B RMBS and identified over 100 bonds it expected to experience credit events in the near future.

Paulson’s selection criteria favored RMBS that included a high percentage of adjustable rate mortgages, relatively low borrower FICO scores, and a high concentration of mortgages in states like Arizona, California, Florida and Nevada that had recently experienced high rates of home price appreciation. Paulson informed GS&Co that it wanted the reference portfolio for the contemplated transaction to include the RMBS it identified or bonds with similar characteristics.

26. On January 8, 2007, Tourre attended a meeting with representatives from Paulson and ACA at Paulson’s offices in New York City to discuss the proposed transaction.

27. On January 9, 2A07, GS&Co sent an email to ACA with the subject line, “Paulson Portfolio”. Attached to the email was a list of 123 2006 RMBS rated Baa2. On January 9, 20O7, ACA performed an “overlap analysis” and determined that it previously had purchased 62 of the 123 RMBS on Paulson’s list at the same or lower ratings.

28. On January 9, 2007, GS&Co informed ACA that Fabrice Tourre was “very excited by the initial portfolio feedback”.

29. On January 10, 2007, Tourre sent an email to ACA with the subject line, “Transaction Summary”. The text of Tourre’s email began: “we wanted to summarize ACA’s proposed role as ‘Portfolio Selection Agent’ for the transaction that would be sponsored by Paulson & Co. (the ‘Transaction Sponsor’)”. The email continued in relevant part, “[s]tarting portfolio would be ideally what the Transaction Sponsor shared, but there is flexibility around the names”.

30. On January 22, 2007, ACA sent an email to Tourre and others at GS&Co with the subject line, “Paulson Portfolio l-22-10.x1s”. The text of the email began: “Attached please find a worksheet with 86 sub-prime mortgage positions that we would recommend taking exposure to synthetically. Of the 123 names that were originally submitted to us for review, we have included only 55”.

31. On January 27, 2007, ACA met with a Paulson representative in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, and they discussed the proposed transaction and reference portfolio. The next day, on January 28, 2007, ACA summarized the meeting in an email to Tourre. Tourre responded via email later that day: “This is confirming my initial impression that [Paulson] wanted to proceed with you subject to agreement on portfolio and compensation structure”.

32. On February 2, 2007, Paulson, Tourre and ACA met at ACA’s offices in New York City to discuss the reference portfolio. Unbeknownst to ACA at the time, Paulson intended to effectively short the RMBS portfolio it helped select by entering into CDS with GS&Co to buy protection on specific layers of the synthetic CDO’s capital structure. Tourre and GS&Co, of course, were fully aware that Paulson’s economic interests with respect to the quality of the reference portfolio were directly adverse to CDO investors. During the meeting, Tourre sent an email to another GS&Co employee stating: “I am at this ACA Paulson meeting, this is surreal”.

Later the same day, ACA emailed Paulson, Tourre, and others at GS&Co a list of 82 RMBS on which Paulson and ACA concurred, plus a list of 2l “replacement” RMBS. ACA sought Paulson’s approval of the revised list, asking: “Let rne know if these work for you at the Baa2 level”.

33. On February 5, 2007, Paulson sent an email to ACA, with a copy to Tourre, deleting eight RMBS recommended by ACA, leaving the rest, and stating that Tourre agreed that 92 bonds were a sufficient portfolio,

34. On February 5, 2007, an internal ACA email asked: “Attached is the revised portfolio that Paulson would like us to commit to – all names are at the Baa2 level. The final portfolio will have between 80 and these 92 names. Are ‘we’ ok to say yes on this portfolio?”

The response was: “Looks good to me. Did [Paulson] give a reason why they kicked out all
the Wells [Fargo] deals?” Wells Fargo was generally perceived as one of the higher-quality subprime loan originators.

35. On or about February 26, 2007, after further discussion, Paulson and ACA came to an agreement on a reference portfolio of 90 RMBS for ABACUS 2007-AC1 .

F. GS&CO MISLED INVESTORS BY REPRESENTING THAT ACA
SELECTED THE PORTFOLIO WTTHOUT DISCLOSING PAULSON’S
SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN DETERMINING THE PORTFOLIO AND ITS
ADVERSE ECONOMIC INTERESTS

36. GS&Co’s marketing materials for ABACUS 2007-AC1 were false and misleading because they represented that ACA selected the reference portfolio while omitting any mention that Paulson, a party with economic interests adverse to CDO investors, played a significant role in the selection of the reference portfolio.

37. For example, a 9-page term sheet for ABACUS 2007-AC1 finalized by GS&Co on or about February 26, 2007, described ACA as the “Portfolio Selection Agent” and stated in bold print at the top of the first page that the reference portfolio of RMBS bad been “selected by ACA”.

This document contained no mention of Paulson, its economic interests in the transaction, or its role in selecting the reference portfolio.

38. Similarly, a 65-page flip book for ABACUS 2007-AC1 finalized by GS&Co on or about February 26, 2007 represented on its cover page that the reference portfolio of RMBS had been “selected by ACA Management, LLC”. The flip book included a 28-page overview of ACA describing its business strategy, senior management team, investment philosophy, expertise, hack record and credit selection process, together with a 7-page section of biographical information on ACA officers and employees. Investors were assured that the party selecting the portfolio had an “alignment of economic interest” with investors. This document contained no mention of Paulson, its economic interests in the transaction, or its role in selecting the reference portfolio.

39. Tourre had primary responsibility for preparing the term sheet and flip book.

40. The Goldman Sachs MCC, which included senior-level management of GS&Co, approved the ABACUS 2007-AC1 on or about March 12, 2007. GS&Co expected to earn between $15-and-$20 million for structuring and marketing ABACUS 2007-AC1.

41. On or about April 26, 2007, GS&Co finalized a 178-page offering memorandum for ABACUS 2007-AC1. The cover page of the offering memorandum included a description of ACA as “Portfolio Selection Agent”. The Transaction Overview, Summary and Portfolio Selection Agent sections of the memorandum all represented that the reference portfolio of RMBS had been selected by ACA. This document contained no mention of Paulson, its economic interests in the transaction, or its role in selecting the reference portfolio.

42. Tourre reviewed at least the Summary section of the offering
memorandum before it was sent to potential investors.

43. Although the marketing materials for ABACUS 2007-AC1 made no mention of Paulson or of its role in the transaction, internal GS&Co communications clearly identified Paulson, its economic interests, and its role in the transaction. For example, the March 12, 2007 MCC memorandum describing the transaction stated: “Goldman is effectively working an order for Paulson to buy protection on specific layers of the [ABACUS 2007-] AC1 capital structure”.

G. GS&CO MISLED ACA INTO BELIEVING PAULSON WAS LONG EOUITY

44. GS&Co also misled ACA into believing that Paulson was investing in the equity of ABACUS 2007-AC1 and therefore shared a long interest with CDO investors. The equity tranche is at the bottom of the capital structure and is the first to experience losses associated with any deterioration in the performance of the underlying RMBS. Equity investors therefore have an economic interest in the successful performance of a reference RMBS portfolio. As of early 2007, ACA had participated in a number of CDO transactions involving hedge funds that invested in the equity tranche.

45. Had ACA been aware that Paulson was taking a short position against the CDO, ACA would have been reluctant to allow Paulson & Co. to occupy an influential role in the selection of the reference portfolio because it would present serious reputational risk to ACA, which was in effect endorsing the reference portfolio. ln fact, it is unlikely that ACA would have served as portfolio selection agent had it known that Paulson was taking a significant short position instead of a long equity stake in ABACUS 2007-AC1. Tourre and GSSCo were responsible for ACA’s misimpression that Paulson had a long position, rather than a short position, with respect to the CDO.

46. On January 8, 2007, Tourre attended a meeting with representatives from Paulson and ACA at Paulson’s offices in New York City to discuss the proposed transaction. Paulson & Co.’s economic interest was unclear to ACA, which sought further clarification from GS&Co. Later that day, ACA sent a GS&Co sales representative an email with the subject line “Paulson meeting” that read:

“I have no idea how it went – I wouldn’t say it went poorly, not at all, but I think it didn’t help that we didn’t know exactly how they [Paulson] want to participate in the space.

Can you get us some feedback?”

47. On January 10, 2007, Tourre emailed ACA a “Transaction Summary ”that included a description of Paulson as the “Transaction Sponsor” and referenced a “Contemplated Capital Structure” with a “[0]% – [9]%: pre-committed first loss” as part of the Paulson deal structure.

The description of this “[0]% – [9]%” tranche at the bottom of the capital structure was consistent with the description of an equity tranche and ACA reasonably believed it to be a reference to the equity tranche. In fact, GS&Co never intended to market to anyone a “[0]% – [9]%” first loss equity tranche in this transaction.

48. On January 12, 2007, Tourre spoke by telephone with ACA about the proposed transaction. Following that conversation, on January l4, 20O7, ACA sent an email to the GS&Co sales repres- entative raising questions about the proposed transaction and referring to Paulson’s equity interest. The email, which had the subject line “Call with Fabrice [Tourre] on Friday”, read in pertinent part:

“I certainly hope I didn’t come across too antagonistic on the call with Fabrice [Torre] last week but the structure looks difficult from a debt investor perspective. I can understand Paulson’s equity perspective but for us to put our name on something, we have to be sure that it enhances our reputation”.

49. On January 16, 2007, the GS&Co sales representative forwarded that email to Tourre. As of that date, Tourre knew, or was reckless in not knowing, that ACA had been misled into believing Paulson intended to invest in the equity of ABACUS 2007-AC1.

50. Based upon the January l0, 2007, “Transaction Summary” sent by Tourre, the January 12,2007 telephone call with Tourre and continuing communications with Tourre and others at GS&Co, ACA continued to believe through the course of the transaction that Paulson would be an equity investor in ABACUS 2007-AC1.

51. On February 12, 2007, ACA’s Commitments Committee approved the firm’s participation in ABACUS as portfolio selection agent. The written approval memorandum described Paulson’s role as follows: “The hedge fund equity investor wanted to invest in the 0%-9% tranche of a static mezzanine ABS CDO backed 100% by subprime residential mortgage securities”.

Handwritten notes from the meeting reflect discussion of “portfolio selection work
with the equity investor.”

H. ABACUS 2OO7-AC1 INVESTORS

I. IKB

52. IKB is a commercial bank headquartered in Düsseldorf. Germany. Historically, IKB specialized in lending to small and medium-sized companies. Beginning in and around 2002, IKB, for itself and as an advisor, was involved in the purchase of securitized assets referencing, or consisting of, consumer credit risk including RMBS CDOs backed by U.S. mid-and-subprime mortgages.

IKB’s former subsidiary, IKB Credit Asset Management, provided investment advisory services to various purchasing entities participating in a commercial paper conduit known as the “Rhineland programme conduit”.

53. The identity and experience of those involved in the selection of CDO portfolios was an important investment factor for IKB, In late 2006, IKB informed a GS&Co sales representative and Tourre that it was no longer comfortable investing in the liabilities of CDOs that did not utilize a collateral manager, meaning an independent third-party with knowledge of the U.S. housing market and expertise in analyzing RMBS. Tourre and GS&Co knew that ACA was a collateral manager likely to be acceptable to IKB.

54. In February, March and April 2007, GS&Co sent IKB copies of the ABACUS 2007-AC1 term sheet, flipbook and offering memorandum, all of which represented that the RMBS portfolio had been selected by ACA and omitted any reference to Paulson & Co., its role in selecting the reference portfolio and its adverse economic interests. Those representations and omissions were materially false and misleading because, unbeknownst to IKB, Paulson & Co. played a significant role in the collateral selection process and had financial interests in the transaction directly adverse to IKB. Neither GS&Co nor Tourre informed IKB of Paulson & Co.’s participation in the collateral selection process and its adverse economic interests.

55. The first written marketing materials for ABACUS 2007-AC1 were distributed on February 15, 2007, when GS&Co emailed a preliminary term sheet and reference portfolio to the GS&Co sales representative covering IKB. Tourre was aware these materials would be delivered to IKB.

56. On February 19, 2007, the GS&Co sales representative forwarded the marketing materials to IKB, explaining via email: “Attached are details of the ACA trade we spoke about with Fabrice [Toune] in which you thought the AAAs would be interesting”.

57. Tourre maintained direct and indirect contact with IKB in an effort to close the deal. This included a March 6, 2007 email to the GS&Co sales representative for IKB representing that:

“This is a portfolio selected by ACA . . .”. Tourre subsequently described the
portfolio in an intemal GS&Co email as having been “selected by ACA/Paulson”.

58. ABACUS 2007-AC1 closed on or about April 26, 2007. IKB bought $50 million worth of Class A-l notes at face value. The Class A-l Notes paid a variable interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 85 basis points and were rated Aaa by Moody’s Investors Services, Inc. (“Moody’s”) and AAA by Standard & Poor’s Ratings & Services (“S&P”). IKB bought $100 million worth of Class A-2 Notes at face value. The Class A-2 Notes paid a variable interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 110 basis points and were rated Aaa by Moody’s and AAA by S&P.

59. The fact that the portfolio had been selected by an independent third-party with experience and economic interests aligned with CDO investors was important to IKB. IKB would not have invested in the transaction had it known that Paulson played a significant role in the collateral selection process while intending to take a short position in ABACUS 2007- AC1. Among other things, the knowledge of Paulson’s role would have seriously undermined IKB’s confidence in the portfolio selection process and led senior IKB personnel to oppose the transaction.

60. Within months of closing, ABACUS 2007-AC1’s Class A-l and A-2 Notes were nearly worthless. IKB lost almost all of its $150 million investment. Most of this money was ultimately paid to Paulson in a series of transactions between GS&Co and Paulson.

2. ACA/ABN AMRO

61. ACA’s parent company, ACA Capital Holdings, Inc. ( “ACA Capital”), provided financial guaranty insurance on a variety of structured finance products including RMBS CDOs, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, ACA Financial Guaranty Corporation. On or about May 31, 2007, ACA Capital sold protection or “wrapped” the $909 million super senior tranche of ABACUS 2007-AC1, meaning that it assumed the credit risk associated with that portion of the capital structure via a CDS in exchange for premium payments of approximately 50 basis points per year.

62. ACA Capital was unaware of Paulson’s short position in the transaction. It is unlikely that ACA Capital would have written protection on the super senior tranche if it had known that Paulson, which played an influential role in selecting the reference portfolio, had taken a significant short position instead of a long equity stake in ABACUS 2007-ACL.

63. The super senior transaction with ACA Capital was intermediated by ABN AMRO Bank N.V(“ABN”), which was one of the largest banks in Europe during the relevant period.

This meant that, through a series of CDS between ABN and Goldman and between ABN and ACA that netted ABN premium payments of approximately 17 basis points per year, ABN assumed the credit risk associated with the super senior portion of ABACUS 2007-AC1’s capital structure in the event ACA Capital was unable to pay.

64. GS&Co sent ABN copies of the ABACUS 2007-AC1 term sheet, flipbook and offering memorandum, all of which represented that the RMBS portfolio had been selected by ACA and omitted any reference to Paulson’s role in the collateral selection process and its adverse economic interest. Tourre also told ABN in emails that ACA had selected the portfolio. These representations and omissions were materially false and misleading because, unbeknownst to ABN, Paulson played a significant role in the collateral selection process and had a financial interest in the transaction that was adverse to ACA Capital and ABN.

65. At the end of 2007, ACA Capital was experiencing severe financial difficulties.

In early 2008, ACA Capital entered into a global settlement agreement with its counterparties to effectively unwind approximately $69 billion worth of CDSs, approximately $26 billion of which were related to 2005-06 vintage subprime RMBS. ACA Capital is currently operating as a run-off financial guaranty insurance company.

66. In late 2007, ABN was acquired by a consortium of banks that included the Royal Bank of Scotland (“RBS”). On or about August 7, 2008, Royal Bank of Scotland unwound ABN’s super senior position in ABACUS 2007-AC1 by paying GS&Co $840,909,090. Most of this money was subsequently paid by GS&Co to Paulson.

CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

FIRST CLAIM I

Section 17(a) of the Securities Act

Paragraphs l-66 are realleged and incorporated herein by reference.

68. GS&Co and Tourre each violated Section l7(a)(1), (2) and (3) of the Exchange
Act [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)(1), (2) & (3)].

69. As set forth above, Goldman and Tourre, in the offer or sale of securities or securities-based swap agreements, by the use of means or instruments of interstate comrnerce or by the mails, directly or indirectly (a) employed devices, schemes or artifices to defraud; (b) obtained money or property by means of untrue statements of material facts or omissions of material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) engaged in transactions, practices or courses of business which operated or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon purchasers of securities.

70. GS&Co and Tourre knowingly, recklessly or negligently misrepresented in the term sheet, flipbook and offering memorandum for ABACUS 2007-AC1 that the reference portfolio was selected by ACA without disclosing the significant role in the portfolio selection process played by Paulson, a hedge fund with financial interests in the transaction directly adverse to IKB, ACA Capital and ABN. GS&Co and Tourre also knowingly, recklessly or negligently misled ACA into believing that Paulson invested in the equity of ABACUS 2007-AC1 and, accordingly, that Paulson & Co.’s interests in the collateral section process were closely aligned with ACA’s when in reality their interests were sharply conflicting.

SECOND CLAIM

Section 10(b) and Rule 10-b(5) of the Exchange Act

71. Paragraphs 1-70 are realleged and incorporated herein by reference.

72. GS&Co and Tourre each violated Section l0(b) of the Exchange Act [5 U.S.C § 78j&)l
and Rule l0b-5 [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5].

73. As set forth above, GS&Co and Tourre, in connection with the purchase or sale of securities
or securities-based swap agreements, by the use of means or instrumentalities of interstate commerce or of the mails, directly or indirectly (a) employed devices, schemes or artifices to defraud; (b) made untrue statements of material facts or omissions of material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) engaged in transactions, practices or courses of business which operated or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon persons.

74. GS&Co and Tourre knowingly or recklessly misrepresented in the term sheet flip book and offering memorandum for ABACUS 2007-ACl that the reference portfolio was selected by ACA without disclosing the significant role in the portfolio selection process played by Paulson, a hedge fund with financial interests in the transaction adverse to IKB, ACA Capital and ABN. GS&Co and Tourre also knowingly or recklessly misled ACA into believing that Paulson invested in the equity of ABACUS 2007-AC1 and, accordingly, that Paulson’s interests in the collateral section process were closely aligned with ACA’s when in reality their interests were sharply conflicting.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, the Commission respectfully requests that this Court enter a judgment:

A. Finding that GS&Co and Tourre each violated the Federal securities laws and
the Commission rule alleged in this Complaint;

B. Permanently restraining and enjoining GS&Co and Tourre from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §77q(a)], Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act [1s U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Exchange Act Rule l0b-5 [17 C.F.R § 240.10b-5];

C. Ordering GS&Co and Tourre to disgorge all illegal profits that they obtained
as a result of their fraudulent misconduct, acts or courses of conduct described in this
Complaint, and to pay prejudgment interest thereon;

D. Imposing civil monetary penalties on GS&Co and Tourre pursuant to
Section 20(d)(2) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t (d)(2)] and
Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act [l5 U.S.C. §78u(d)(3)]; and:

E. Granting such equitable relief as may be appropriate or necessary for the benefit
of investors pursuant to Section 2l(d)(5) of the Exchange Act [5 U.S.C. §78u(d)(5)].

Dated: Washington, D.C.

April 16,2010

Respectfully submitted [signed]

Andrew M. Calamari (AC-4864)
Richard E. Simpson (RS 5859)
Reid A. Muoio (RM 2274)

Kenneth Lench
Cheryl J. Scarboro
James A. Kidney
Jeffrey Tao
Jason Anthony
Nicole C. Kelly
Jeff Leasure

Securities and Exchange Commission
IOO F St., NE
Washington, D.C. 20549-4010
(202) 551-4492 (Simpson)
simpsonr@sec.gov

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

NOTICES:

BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time AMENDING AND INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE. In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

CMKM/CMKX $3.87 TRILLION LAWSUIT GOES ‘MAINSTREAM’

cropped-chrisstory

TIM BARELLO’S EXPOSURE REPORT ON EXAMINER.COM

Friday 9 April 2010 11:30

• CMKM DIAMONDS AND THE $3.87 TRILLION LAWSUIT YOU DIDN’T HEAR ABOUT

• UNLESS YOU FOLLOW WORLD REPORTS IN WHICH CASE YOU READ IT HERE FIRST

•* CMKM GOES MAINSTREAM WORLDWIDE AND IN GERMANY
Tim Barello has reported to us from New York [9th April 2010]: ‘Following a tremendous impact from Monday’s RT broadcast (which was seen in over 100 nations, and has since been reproduced and viewed many times over online) and the accompanying Examiner.com article, we can now note that CMKM has gone mainstream in Germany, via ARD, a major German broadcaster.
Link: http://boerse.ard.de/content.jsp?key=dokument_426752

• We have re-dated this report, which was originally posted on 31st March 2010. The Editor is working on reports addressing the accelerating unravelling of the Fraudulent Finance crisis, revolutionary examples of the collapse of the Rule of Law, and the George H. W. Bush I regime’s attempt to grab the Falkland Islands by activating its long-term Nazi assets in Argentina in 1982.

• Like everything else this personification of the Evil One does, that grabitisation ploy collapsed.

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

SECURITIZATION IS ILLEGAL UPDATE: In the Subs/Books Update panel immediately below the NEWS panel that you are currently viewing, you will see an announcement concerning publication of Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 7 & 8. If you press that announcement text and open up the panel, you will see the contents list for the new [2010Q1] issue of E.I.R., including a breakdown of the Chapter Headings for the detailed analysis showing that Securitization is illegal. See our NEWS report dated 10th March 2010 for summaries of some of the data from this analysis. We understand that the report has created uproar in certain corridors of corrupt power.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• OUR PHONE SYSTEMS HAVE NOW BEEN CLOSED DOWN:
Due to incessant Psy-Ops harassment by the Cheney/Biden/NSA criminal operatives, we have had to close down our telephone connections. On returning to the London office, the Editor found 13 obscene messages from the paid USG maniac on our London voicemail overnight 30-31 March, and the USG maniac started up again shortly after noon UK time on 31st. All our telephone connections have therefore been severed and will remain severed and out of service until further notice. As previously noted, we must be doing something right, or these brainwashed sickos in urgent need of brain surgery wouldn’t have been doing this non-stop since February 2008.

• Note: Although we were advised that this is a Cheney/Biden/NSA harassment offensive, we bear in mind that it could be a DVD operation. That would make sense, given Bush Sr.’s links with DVD, and his close association with Dr Helmut Kohl, the former Chancellor of Germany, as a partner in Deutsche AG (formerly Barrington Investment Group) and Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev*. It would also make sense given that this operation started in February 2008, with the Wanta ‘switch’.

• If this is a DVD operation, the US authorities have done NOTHING TO TERMINATE IT, so they are complicit in this illegal harassment and in the STEALING OF OUR COMMUNICATIONS.

• We can be contacted as normal via email or fax, and via the CONTACT US facility below.

* Gorbachev’s KGB/Oligarch associate, Lebedev, who has just lifted some of the stolen funds held in Deutsche AG to bail out the second-rate, loss-making UK newspapers The Independent and The Independent on Sunday, is now presiding over a full-frontal attack on The Queen’s finances in The Independent. This is NOT A COINCIDENCE and represents a new dimension of the ongoing attack on the British Monarchy, which is also being openly assisted by the corrupt German-Jewish Pope Ratzinger, whose contribution so far has been to ‘invite’ disillusioned clergy, bishops and members of the Church of England into his reprobate church, as a means of helping to destroy the Church of England, of which The Queen is Head. If they can destroy the Church of England, they remove a key prop from beneath the Monarchy. The Pope’s cynical offensive against the Church of England, like the Gorbachev/Lebedev offensive against The Queen’s finances, is a DVD operation. The KGB/GRU collaborate with DVD at the highest level, as previously reported by this service.

• MAIN CMKM REPORTS PUBLISHED HERE: SEE ARCHIVE:

• 09 January 2010: Text of the CMKM/CMKX lawsuit against the S.E.C.
Case Number CV10-00031-JVS (MLGX): See also Report dated 7th January 2010

• 29 January 2010: Service of CMKM/CMKX $3.87 trillion suit vs. S.E.C.
Biggest lawsuit in world history: The Phantom Shares giga-scandal

• 02 March 2010: S.E.C. Phantom shares fraud: New Intelligence
Latest developments following the blowing of the cauldron lid

• You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda

REPORT BY TIM BARELLO, EXAMINER.COM, NEW YORK, STARTS HERE:

Tim Barello writes to us from New York City: This article is currently the #1 article on the entire NY hyperlocal site, meaning that hundreds of thousands and possibly millions of unique viewers are seeing it right now at:

http://www.examiner.com/x-9341-Manhattan-Headlines-Examiner~y2010m3d30-CMKM-Diamonds-and-the-387-trillion-lawsuit-you-didnt-hear-about

The link we provided works, but you musn’t include the period at the end of the sentence!!!!!:
http://www.examiner.com/new_york

Editor’s Note: Tim has done a first-rate job of summarising the essential points of the CMKM Case for the general reader.

S.E.C. COMMISSIONERS AT RECEIVING END OF WORLD’S BIGGEST-EVER LAWSUIT
As the United States continues to fracture in every way imaginable, most citizens are unable to keep up with the never-ending hodgepodge of government corruption. Each day, a new larger-than-life scandal emerges, and in the short mind span of news media, there is always a bigger and better story to chase. Right now, the hot button issue for mainstream news outlets is healthcare reform, and its myriad implications for our society; this doubtlessly ensures the aforementioned media will continue to overlook unprecedented accusations brought forth in a recent $3.87 trillion lawsuit against U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Mary L. Shapiro, as well as several other current and former SEC commissioners, among others.

This Bivens action suit represents the largest fraud case in world history, and was filed in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California, on January 8th by Pasadena attorney Al Hodges; in his complaint, made on behalf of CMKM Diamonds shareholders, Hodges alleges that:

• [Complaint paragraph 31] During the period of June 1, 2004 through October 28, 2005 a total of 2.25 Trillion “phantom” shares of CMKM Diamonds Inc, was sold into the public market through legitimate brokers, illegitimate brokers and dealers, market makers, hedge funds, ex-clearing transactions and private transactions” The sales of the majority of such shares were at all times known to the Securities and Exchange Commission, including Defendants herein”.

• [Complaint paragraph 32] At some date prior to June 1, 2004 the Securities and Exchange Commission in concert with the Department of Justice of the United States, together combined with Robert A. Maheu and others to utilize CMKM Diamonds, Inc. for the purpose of trapping a number of widely disbursed entities and persons who were believed to be engaged in naked short selling of CMKM Diamonds Inc. stock and cellar boxing the company.

The Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice, with assistance from the Department of Homeland Security, believed and developed evidence that said short sellers were utilizing their activities to illegally launder moneys, wrongfully export moneys, avoid payment of taxes, and to support foreign terrorist operations.

To fulfill the plan to criminally trap such wrongdoers, the Securities and Exchange Commission, with assistance from the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security:

(a) Assisted in and approved the retention of Roger Glenn, an ex-SEC trial attorney and drafter of Sarbanes-Oxley, to join CMKM Diamonds Inc. for the purpose of verifying claims value, increasing authorized shares of stock to 800,000,000,000, and supervising from the inside of the company;

(b) Encouraged the company to expand its promotional activities, assisted in the set up of the “racing activities” of the company, and underwrote a substantial portion of the cost of such activities;

(c) Consented to, facilitated, and supported the sale of certain company claims to several foreign corporations;

(d) Consented to, facilitated, and supported the conferences between Robert A. Maheu and his associates on the one hand, and the wrongdoing short sellers on the other, all for the purpose of settling the potential liability of said wrongdoers with consent of the U. S. Government and a representation of no criminal prosecution for such illegal sales;

(e) Consented to, facilitated, and supported the declaration of dividends payable by the company to each common shareholder of CMKM Diamonds, Inc.

(f) Consented to, facilitated, and supported the distribution of shares of CIM, a private company owned by Urban Casavant, as a stock dividend, including consent and approval of distribution of said shares to holders of more than 1.4 Trillion shares of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. common stock.
Based on these assertions, CMKM was used by the U.S. government as part of a covert sting operation – unbeknownst to shareholders – to apprehend criminals for their offenses. However, instead of prosecuting most of them, restitution deals were apparently cut:

• [Complaint paragraph 34] During the period from March, 2004 through August, 2006, on behalf of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Robert A. Maheu, with assistance from others, negotiated a settlement with the illegitimate brokers, dealers, market makers, hedge funds, and other persons and entities that had engaged in naked short selling of CMKM Diamonds Inc. stock and cellar boxing the company. In exchange for a U. S. Government promise of no prosecution for such sales, the wrongdoers each promised to pay negotiated amounts to a frozen trust for disbursal at a later time.

• [Complaint paragraph 35] Plaintiffs herein are informed and believe, and based thereon allege, that other moneys have been collected for the benefit of the shareholders of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. from the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation, from the United States Government, and from the sale of additional assets including consent to enter into joint venture agreements with other companies holding mineral claims in Saskatchewan, Canada. Plaintiffs herein are further informed and believe, and based thereon allege, that said moneys, collected for the benefit of shareholders have also been placed in a trust or are otherwise now held in trust by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation and the United States Treasury.

Therefore, the crux of this complaint – and the massive fraud allegedly committed by the SEC (and Department of Justice) – is as follows:

• [Complaint paragraph 36] Plaintiffs herein are informed and believe, and based thereon allege, that at all times mentioned, the Securities and Exchange Commission reserved unto itself the sole and absolute discretion to determine when moneys collected pursuant to the scheme set forth above would and could be released for distribution.

• [Complaint paragraph 37] Demand for release of said moneys has been repeatedly presented to the Securities and Exchange Commission without result. Agents and employees of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice have represented repeatedly that the release of moneys for distribution was imminent, and/or would occur within several weeks, and/or would occur within less than a month. Each of said representations have been made knowing them to be false, and at the specific direction of the named Defendants. These actions of withholding distribution of said moneys, without compensation and without due process of law, amount to a taking of the property of the individual Plaintiffs and of all similarly situated.

During the timeframe referenced above, CMKM was registered as a publicly traded diamond and gold mining company. By 2005, concrete evidence detailing fraud within the company emerged; in addition, it became publicly apparent that CMKM also sold, at the very least, hundreds of billions of unregistered shares – a practice often referred to as naked short selling – to third parties.

Eventually, the SEC moved to delist CMKM stock, whose value never exceeded one penny per share, in accordance with Section 12(j) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. After several administrative proceedings, CMKM stock was ultimately deregistered in October 2005.

In September 2006, Floyd Norris, chief financial correspondent of The New York Times and The International Herald Tribune, caught wind of the CMKM scandals, and began to report on some elements of the criminal fraud that ravaged CMKM’s estimated 40,000 shareholders.

Norris has reported on more than one occasion that at least 259 billion shares of unregistered CMKM stock was sold; however, per the SEC’s 2008 action against CMKM, the agency itself acknowledges that as many as 622 billion shares of “purportedly unregistered stock” was sold by the company over a 20 month period.

So, how did Hodges initially determine that at least 2 trillion unregistered shares were sold?
[Complaint paragraph 25] A frequently asked question (FAQ) page was added to the web site [CMKMTaskForce.com] on the evening of November 4, 2005 and in response to a question about the degree of naked shorting of CMKM stock, the Task Force [consisting of Robert A. Maheu, Donald J. Stoecklein and Bill Frizzell] indicated that “Credible information indicates the number of naked short shares is potentially as high as 2 Trillion shares”.

‘QUITE A CASE’
Several weeks ago, I spoke with Al Hodges, a practicing attorney with four decades of experience, to find out more about this extraordinary case, and moreover, to determine from him exactly how he calculated his clients’ potential damages to be nearly $4 trillion – a figure many observers have openly scoffed at.

Almost immediately, I could not help but ask why the ‘mainstream’ media has not fairly reported on this case; frankly, given the scope of accusations, one would assume that, at the very least, Floyd Norris and The New York Times would have some interest in thoroughly examining the merits of this action; instead, Norris has essentially brushed off Hodges’ allegations as being baseless.
It’s not that Hodges and his associates haven’t tried to attract the media’s interest; in fact, on this side of the Atlantic, all the major dailies, including The Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post have all been informed of the suit.

Their respective editorial staffs – with the exception of Floyd Norris – have utterly decided to ignore it. In the United Kingdom, efforts have also been made to attract mainstream media interest. Veteran financial intelligence Editor and Publisher Christopher Story FRSA – an investigative specialist that focuses on covert government operations and scandals – has personally reached out to The Daily Telegraph’s International Business Editor Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, with whom he is acquainted, to notify him about Hodges’ case. To date, Pritchard has failed to respond to Mr. Story, who has authored a number of articles (1) – and other published commentary – in The Daily Telegraph over the course of his near 50-year-career.

Hodges noted that Story, publisher of International Currency Review, and several other serials, is “subscribed to by every intelligence operation in the world”.

If intelligence agencies are reading about CMKM, then why isn’t the mainstream press covering this case? Hodges prudently observed that “they’re not going to touch it” (2).

MAINSTREAM MEDIA WON’T COVER ISSUES TIED TO COVERT OPERATIONS? (EVIDENTLY NOT)
“They* used the shareholders without their consent to perform this ‘sting operation’ for National Security interests, and it wouldn’t have worked the way it worked if they had disclosed it”, he continued. [*: The Government, i.e. the Intelligence Power: Ed.].

“On the other hand, it isn’t right to bury a company and put them out of business for the purpose of trapping people who are using the company to cheat the government, to line their own pockets, and to fund their operations against the United States”.

As noted above in complaint paragraph 34, and per Hodges, a deal was eventually reached with the aforementioned criminals; they paid the government restitution for documented illegal actions, and in turn, were offered immunity from prosecution.

“Rob Maheu had all these people in a big room in Las Vegas, and made [an] offer to them”, he said.

“Every person, organization and representative in that room stepped up, and either transferred money while they were there, or agreed to transfer money upon some further schedule” to avoid indictment. Hodges also said: “I have a witness who was there, who saw it, and part of the 2.25 trillion phantom shares is documented by that person’s observations of how many shares were represented in that room”.

HOW MUCH MONEY DID THE FEDS REALLY COLLECT FOR RESTITUTION?
“People are going to laugh and titter about the amount of money that is being claimed, but understand the context of the lawsuit”, he said, before concluding: “We are not asking the Government to pay us $3.87 trillion: what we’re asking is for them to release the funds that have been collected for us”. Thus, the implication is that this sum also incorporates substantial punitive damages. Note: Mr Hodges confirmed to the Editor of this service on his return to London on 30th March that the lawsuit proceeds and will be prosecuted, which is causing the individual S.E.C. personnel extreme angst, as can be imagined (3).

In the end, Hodges believes the U.S. Government is going to settle the case before it actually moves to trial. On this possibility, he said, “I think its in the process of happening as we speak”.

Based on these explanations – and the recent scandals and assertions that have surfaced about the SEC – I believe the mainstream media is doing the public a great disservice by not properly examining Hodges’ CMKM case.

The same conclusion must also be drawn about Christopher Story’s reports on the criminality that is undermining international efforts to refund the U.S. dollar, which is dangerously close to losing its status as the world’s global reserve currency…but that’s touching on a whole other can of worms…or is it?

Notes and References:

(1): In Paul Johnson’s article “Unions, Pensions, and Financial Responsibility: The British Experience” published in the Journal of Labor Research, Volume 2, Issue 2 (1981) pp. 292, 294, 295, 296, he highlights Christopher Story’s authoritative research, as published in The Daily Telegraph on 30 April, 31 August and 1 September 1976, as well as on 4 September 1978.

(2): During the Editor’s stay in New York (16th to 30th March), he held conversations with a number of ‘connected’ people. One such impeccable source he has known personally for two decades has confirmed the Editor’s statement that ‘there’s an intelligence cell in every press room’. She replied:
‘That’s absolutely correct’. (One method of obtaining such information is to reach a conclusion and then to put that conclusion to the contact for assessment. If the information is accurate, the usual consequence is that the information will be confirmed. They can confirm or deny, but can’t ‘inform’).

(3): Telephone call placed by the Editor to Mr Hodges on his return to the London office on 30th March, at about 11:00pm UK time.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS ARE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

All securitisation is illegal under US and Common Law: see report dated 10th March 2010.

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time AMENDING AND INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE. In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

SENATOR ARLEN SPECTER INVOKES MISPRISION OF FELONY

story2

THEY’VE GOT A COLOSSAL PROBLEM: AND IT’S US

Monday 29 March 2010 00:01

• PENNSYLVANIA BIRDS OF A FEATHER:
SENATOR ARLEN SPECTOR, AND SALVATORE DEFRANCESCO ARE FROM PENNSYLVANIA;
VICE PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN IS ORIGINALLY FROM SCRANTON, PENNSYLVANIA, AND HAS
CALLED PA HIS ‘HOME’, SAYING ONCE THAT HE WAS PENNSYLVANIA’S ‘THIRD SENATOR’

• SENATOR ARLEN SPECTOR SUDDENLY CITES MISPRISION OF FELONY

• WHY WOULD SENATOR SPECTER DO THAT?
BECAUSE THEY HAVE A SERIOUS PROBLEM

• AND WHO OR WHAT IS THEIR PROBLEM?

• SENATOR ARLEN SPECTER RINGS THE ALARM

• TO OFFER JOBS FOR FAVOURS IS A FEDERAL CRIME

• SOME COMPELLING FACTS YOU OUGHT TO KNOW

• BUT SENATOR ARLEN SPECTER WAS TARGETING
THE PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD AT THE SAME TIME: GEDDIT?

• A SHORT LIST OF PEOPLE WHO COULD GO TO JAIL

• BECAUSE OF COURSE IT’S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY. PERIOD

• U.S. INTEREST RATES RISING AS THESE FOOLS TRY TO EMBEZZLE THE FUNDS AGAIN

• GOV. RENDELL RAISES TAXES, YET ‘BLOCKS’ THE $495 MILLION TAX WINDFALL

• THE N.S.A.-CHENEY-BIDEN ‘BLACK OPS’
PSY-OPS OFFENSIVE AGAINST COTTRELL AND STORY

• STEALING OUR TELECOMMUNICATIONS; A FEDERAL OFFENCE

• FEATURES OF THIS COUNTERPRODUCTIVE U.S.G. ‘PSY-OPS’
OPERATION LASTING FOR MORE THAN TWO YEARS ALREADY

• CHENEY/BIDEN/NSA ‘BLACK OPS’ VERBAL TERRORISM PHONE CALLS RECEIVED IN OUR OFFICES: THIS IS DELIBERATE U.S. GOVERNMENT HARASSMENT BECAUSE WE ARE HITTING THE CRIMINALISTS’ NERVES AND ARE REFUSING TO BE INTIMIDATED AND TERRORISED

• This matter has been reported inter alia to the British Consulate General, 845 Third Avenue,
@ E 52nd Street, New York, NY: 212-745 0200 with a demand that the obscene harassment ops. conducted against this service and the Editor by the Cheney/Biden/NSA cadre is taken up with the relevant US authorities and our complaint about this barbaric behaviour of a supposedly friendly Government addressed with the necessary vigour appropriate to this scandalous state of affairs.

• SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO LINKED TO BIDEN:
THE NEW TWIST IN THE PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD

• As you may recall, we were advised earlier that Treasury Agents and the FBI were looking for Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, and that he would be cuffed shortly. Then all of a sudden, we were told that this top Mafioso, who is Vice President of Penn Acceptance Corporation, was no longer being sought. We now realise that the reason for this is that he is being protected by Governor Edward G. Rendell of Pennsylvania. We thought that harbouring a suspected criminal was a criminal offence.

• MR COTTRELL’S LATEST STRUGGLES WITH DELIBERATELY
UNCOOPERATIVE AND ARROGANT PA OFFICIALS

• WICKED DIVERSIONARY TACTIC BY CORNERED
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE OFFICIALS:
REPRESENTING THAT PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
IS A HOLDING COMPANY, WHICH IS NOT THE CASE

• THEY TOOK MR COTTRELL’S FILING MONEY
BUT DIDN’T CHANGE THE PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC. SCREEN

• SO, MR COTTRELL FAXED THE GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA’S OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL, THE GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA, EDWARD G. RENDELL, THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE CORPORATION DEPARTMENT AND THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ALL OVER AGAIN, WITH ALL THE DOCUMENTS

• THAT WAY, A MASSIVE PAPER TRAIL PERTINENT
TO ‘MISPRISION OF FELONY’ IS ON THE RECORD

• IN MEMORIAM AND HORIZONTALISATION NEWS:

• MANAGING DIRECTOR OF THE ABU DHABI INVESTMENT AUTHORITY [SCAMMED BY BUSH]

• Note: Suggestions by fantasists on other websites that an imminent ‘return’ to the Constitution across the board is in the pipeline and that most State Governors have agreed to this, is baloney. The behaviour of Governor Edward G. Rendell of Pennsylvania, addressed in this report, indicates that he continues to operate without regard for the Rule of Law as he is implicated in the attempt, with Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, to embezzle the funds payable to Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. The fantasists have again revealed that they operate on the basis of ‘feelings’ and unwarranted assumptions based on flimsy foundations and unscientific, illogical deductions. Unprovenanced, garbled meanderings are no basis for the sweeping deductions these people specialise in, and they do a disserve to bewildered Americans who don’t know where to turn for sound information.

• Update to this note: There appears to be confusion in some minds between (a) the necessity for funds to be collected so that grossly overdue obligations can be met and (b) the sudden waving of a magic wand whereby the Constitution descends from the sky like a Deus ex Machina to shower blessings on disillusioned Americans while shovelling all their woes into the trash. The position is that (a) is taking place: which is why the most high-powered American delegation in living memory descended on Mexico on 23rd March 2010 to pay a visit to President Felipe Calderon.

The delegatation, led by the Secretary of State, Mrs Hillary Clinton, included:
• The Defense Secretary, Robert Gates;
• The Homeland Security Secretary, Janet Napolitano;
• The Director of National Intelligence, Dennis Blair; and:
• The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Michael Mullen [ONI].

Conspicuous by his absence was the US Attorney General, Eric Holder: which tells you that the meeting was not about how to tackle Mexico’s drug problem. Meanwhile Barack Obama surfaced in Afghanistan. One does not need a first class degree In logic to deduce what has been going on.

This has nothing to do with (b), which is a separate matter and may or may not follow through. The behaviour of Pennsylvania Governor Rendell described in this and recent reports in this series confirms that, contrary to baseless speculation, there is no change of criminal behaviour, which in turn indicates that the miraculous ‘Return to the Constitution’ is NOT happening (as yet), for the simple reason that in order to comply with the Constitution it is necessary to comply with the Rule of Law, which Rendell (in the pertinent case cited) is NOT doing.

That is ALL we said, and the deduction that we have ‘missed what is happening’ accompanied by the usual gratuitous, self-satisfied rudeness about 1776 is both uncalled for and the precise opposite of the truth if what we have been saying is understood.

………………………………………………………………

• APPENDIX 1:

MICHAEL C. COTTRELL’S LETTER OF NOTIFICATION OF 9TH MARCH 2010 TO THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE DEMANDING THE IMMEDIATE REMOVAL OF THE NAME OF THE MAFIA IMPOSTOR SALVATORE DE FRANCESCO FROM THE PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC. STATE CORPORATION BUREAU’S OFFICIAL SCREEN, FRAUDULENTLY SHOWING THE IMPOSTOR MAFIOSO AS ‘SECRETARY’ OF THE CORPORATION

………………………………………………………………

• APPENDIX 2:

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT RE: PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC. DATED 13TH MARCH 2010

………………………………………………………………

• APPENDIX 3:

CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION OF CORPORATE RESOLUTION: 16 NOVEMBER 2005

………………………………………………………………

• LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL BIG FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ARE IN BREACH

………………………………………………………………

• U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS ARE IN BREACH

………………………………………………………………

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

SECURITIZATION IS ILLEGAL UPDATE: In the Subs/Books Update panel immediately below the NEWS panel that you are currently viewing, you will see an announcement concerning publication of Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 7 & 8. If you press that announcement text and open up the panel, you will see the contents list for the new [2010Q1] issue of E.I.R., including a breakdown of the Chapter Headings for the detailed analysis showing that Securitization is illegal. See our NEWS report dated 10th March 2010 for summaries of some of the data from this analysis. We understand that the report has created uproar in certain corridors of corrupt power.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

PENNSYLVANIA BIRDS OF A FEATHER:
SENATOR ARLEN SPECTOR, AND SALVATORE DEFRANCESCO ARE FROM PENNSYLVANIA;
VICE PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN IS ORIGINALLY FROM SCRANTON, PENNSYLVANIA, AND HAS
CALLED PA HIS ‘HOME’, SAYING ONCE THAT HE WAS PENNSYLVANIA’S ‘THIRD SENATOR’

Before we start, the following facts are of central importance to understanding what follows, sharply accentuating the ongoing detection, deconstruction and unravelling of the luciferian operation to re-steal The Queen’s $6.2 trillion loan funds for the Refunding of the US Dollar, provided via the Bank of England to Bank of New York Mellon on 19th-20th June 2007, which was criminally diverted on the instructions of Henry M. Paulson Jr., Secretary of the US Treasury, and which is the subject of a WORLD COURT LIEN ON THE U.S. TREASURY dated 6th December 2009:

• Vice President Joseph Biden is originally from Scranton, Pennsylvania and while representing Delaware in the Senate, once described Pennsylvania as his ‘home’, and added that he was Pennsylvania’s ‘third’ Senator. He has always maintained close links to Pennsylvania.

• The Vice President of the United States is always in control of the National Security Agency [NSA]. The reason for including this statement here will be elaborated below.

• Senator Arlen Specter is from Pennsylvania.

• Salvatore R. DeFrancesco is from Pennsylvania.

• Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., remains organised and incorporated as a Business Corporation under Section 204 of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law act of 5th May 1933 (P.L. 364 (15 P.S. Section 1204) for the following purposes stated in the founding documents [copies of which we hold] filed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of State on 11th December 1984: ‘To engage in and to do all lawful acts concerning any or all lawful business for which a corporation may be incorporated under the Business Corporation Law of Pennsylvania Act of May 5, 1933, P.L. 364, as amended’.

SENATOR ARLEN SPECTOR SUDDENLY CITES MISPRISION OF FELONY
On 12th March, immediately after it had become known by the NSA and the White House (from intercepts of our telephone conversations), that we had discovered the illegal and fraudulent insertion of the Mafia impostor Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, Vice President of the money factory Penn Acceptance Corporation of Pittston TWP, Pennsylvania, as ‘Secretary’ of Pennsylvania Investments Inc. on the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Corporation Bureau screen for Mr Cottrell’s corporation, Senator Arlen Specter, from Pennsylvania, made this public statement:

‘There’s a crime called Misprision of a Felony. Misprision of a Felony is when you don’t report a crime. So you’re getting into pretty deep areas here in these considerations’.

Now as you will be aware, NOBODY HAS EVER MENTIONED MISPRISON OF FELONY for the duration of this crisis with the single exception of this service. We have displayed the text of the Misprision of Felony Statute at the top of every report for the past three years, thus:

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

WHY WOULD SENATOR SPECTER DO THAT?
BECAUSE THEY HAVE A SERIOUS PROBLEM
WHY do you suppose someone as knowledgeable of the opaque operations of these high-level criminals has SUDDENLY started quoting Misprision of Felony at this late stage of the crisis?

• ANSWER: Because these people have a serious problem.

AND WHO OR WHAT IS THEIR PROBLEM?
WHO or WHAT is the serious problem they face?

• ANSWER: Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., and Christopher Edward Harle Story FRSA, ARE THE SERIOUS PROBLEM. And it’s getting worse. And they can’t solve the problem the way they want – by re-stealing and re-embezzling The Queen’s $6.2 trillion loan funds and Mr Cottrell’s $15.0+ billion, payable to Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

• In other words, as we have signalled in these reports, WE are regrettably and most unfortunately, AT THE EPICENTRE OF THIS CRISIS. And contrary to what the kleptocracy arrogantly imagined, WE ARE NOT CAVING IN OR GIVING WAY TO THESE CRIMINALS.

So: they don’t know what to do. The endless tension and the lack of resolution, and the incredible economic and financial damage that is being caused by the criminal intent to steal these funds, which is BLOCKING THE SETTLEMENTS GENERALLY, is getting some of these people down.

SENATOR ARLEN SPECTER RINGS THE ALARM
And since it is well understood where it needs to be understood that WE ARE NOT BACKING DOWN, and since the massive international pressure behind the scenes has long since exceeded what these people can tolerate, ALL OF A SUDDEN we find that a very prominent US Senator is RINGING THE ALARM BELL. He’s citing MISPRISION OF FELONY at the criminals, starting at the White House and Mr Biden’s residence and reaching the Mansion of the Governor of Pennsylvania.

• Senator Arlen Spector wants to make sure he’s on the right side of the outcome. But at the same time, he’s put himself in an extremely exposed position. If, as a prominent public figure, you cite the Misprision of Felony Statute, you had better be CERTAIN that you understand precisely what you are doing. Which Senator Arlen Spector most certainly does.

As a ‘person in civil… authority under the United States’ Senator Specter may think that he himself is covered. But since [see below] he undoubtedly made this public statement for the elucidation of individuals resident in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, it is crystal clear that Senator Specter – whose comments, as noted, were uttered on 12th March 2010, shortly after it had become known that we’d unearthed the Pennsylvania Fraud involving Salvatore R. DeFrancesco – has ‘issues’ with his home State (Commonwealth). No prizes for guessing the nature of his (financial) concerns here.

THE COVER FOR SPECTER’S OUTBURST: SESTAK-GATE
But the situation is even more loaded than described hitherto.

We’ll try to condense the background so that it doesn’t get in the way of the present exposure report. On 18th February 2010, Philadelphia TV anchor Larry Kane said that on a Comcast show he had just taped, he had asked Democratic Congressman Joe Sestak, who is challenging incumbent Senator Arlen Specter in a Primary, whether it was true that the Obama Administration had offered Mr Sestak a job if he would withdraw from his Primary challenge to Specter, to which Joe Spestak answered: ‘Yes’, adding that the job offer was made by someone in the White House and that he, Sestak, had turned down the offer. Two hours later Kane called the White House, played them the tape, and asked for comment. The White House never called him back.

TO OFFER JOBS FOR FAVOURS IS A FEDERAL CRIME
To offer jobs for favours is a Federal crime, and Sestak effectively accused the White House, therefore, of a Federal crime. The issue was taken up by Jake Tapper, the ABC White House correspondent on 22nd February 2010, when he asked the White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs for a reaction to Sestak’s de facto charge. Gibbs stonewalled (fearing Misprision of Felony).

On 1st March 2010 the Fox News correspondent, Major Garrett tried again. Gibbs: ‘I have not made any progress on that. I was remiss on this and I apologise’. On 9th March, Major Garrett tried again, and drew another blank from Gibbs. On 11th March, Major Garrett of Fox News tried again, noting that Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA) had publicised that he had written to White House Counsel, Robert Bauer, demanding an investigation into Sestak’s charge. Mr Gibbs: ‘I don’t have anything additional on that’. Q: ‘Are you ever going to have anything additional on that?’ Gibbs: ‘I don’t have it today’. On 12th March, Gibbs answered Garrett’s repeated question with: ‘I don’t have any more information on that’. And that was that.

And on 12th March, all of a sudden, Senator Arlen Specter stated that if anyone receives such an offer (of an official job in exchange for a favour) and didn’t report it, the person concerned could GO TO JAIL FOR COMMITTING A FELONY: i.e. Sestak could go to jail.

• There have been calls for a Special Prosecutor to be appointed to investi-gate Sestak-gate.

SOME COMPELLING FACTS YOU OUGHT TO KNOW
Now here are several compelling additional pieces of relevant information:

• Senator Arlen Specter has had a very long relationship with the Bush Crime Family.

• Vice President Joseph Biden, originally from Pennsylvania [see above], in charge today of the National Security Agency, and who, when referred to as ‘Mr Banking’, sat on the US Senate Banking Committee, is aware of everything there is to know about hidden financial operations and issues, and is reported to us to be known to have been involved in questionable financial operations.

For instance, he was instrumental in the MBNA takeover and in the reincorporation of MBNA from Maryland to Delaware. In 1996, after it had become MBNA company policy for all top executives to live in Delaware, MBNA executive John Cochrane bought Senator Joe Biden’s house in Delaware, assisted, according to MBNA’s SEC filing, by $330,115 paid to John Cochrane by the senior MBNA management for ‘expenses’ arising from the move (of which $210,000 was reportedly to make up for a loss that John Cochrane suffered on the sale of his Maryland home).

Local Delaware real estate sources believe that Cochrane ‘overpaid’ Biden for the property.

• Questions have been asked as to whether the home sale was a ‘sweetheart’ deal for Biden.

At all events, during the 1996 senatorial campaign, MBNA cemented its ties to Biden when MBNA employees started showering Senator Biden with campaign contributions. In fact Federal Election Commission records showed MBNA as the largest single source of campaign contributions for Senator Biden. A few weeks after Biden was re-elected in November 1996, MBNA hired his son, Hunter, a Yale law graduate.

Joe Biden, with a Jesuitical background, shares a peculiar characteristic that is quite common among such ‘possessed’ characters. His mouth suddenly opens, and out comes an extremely unwelcome, untimely and probably provocative or idiotic observation. Biden is notorious for this, and did it yet again into Barack Obama’s microphone, which wasn’t switched off, at the signing ceremony for the Health Pipeline Bill, when he exclaimed: ‘This is a big [expletive deleted] deal’. Newscasters have been playing the clip ever since.

Biden sits in Cheney’s seat, and Cheney launched the Psy-Ops harassment operation against the Editor of this service via the National Security Agency in February 2008, after the Wanta ‘switch’. This verbal terrorism ‘Psy-Ops’ offensive against this Editor has continued without a break ever since then, and has reached new levels of intensity under Biden: see below for details.

• Congressman Joe Sestak, who sits on the House Armed Services Committee, was a senior Four-Star Navy Admiral. He was the head of the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), the most lethal of all components of the US Intelligence Power, which has all along been fighting other components of the Intelligence Power over control of stolen and other monies. Sestak was fired (relieved of his command) from the Navy and had one of his stars removed, so he left the US Navy with three stars. He has a degree from Harvard University, was involved in operations in Afghanistan, in national defence and security policy formulation, and in operation ‘Deep Blue’ (a terrorism ‘think-tank’).

SESTAK-GATE RUNS COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTROL
According to Jeffrey Lord writing in The American Spectator [16th March 2010], who assumes that Specter’s remark has resonance exclusively within the Sestak-gate context, ‘in a blink, Specter has raised the stakes here…. Even more remarkable is to comprehend why Robert Gibbs may now be standing at that White House podium five different times and refusing to answer questions from Jake Tapper and Major Garrett. If Sestak has told the truth… then not only is the person or persons within the White House who made the job offer in big trouble, but anybody else on the Obama White House staff who currently knows this has happened and has not reported it to the proper official authorities – the FBI, just for starters – is, according to Specter, a potential prosecution target for Misprision of Felony. For which this person or persons could go to jail along with whoever offered the job in the first place’.

‘Quite possibly, that could include Robert Gibbs, if in fact he knows this job offer occurred. Which is surely incentive enough for Mr Gibbs to understand that he doesn’t want to ask this question of his colleagues – much less get an answer. An answer for which he could be legally liable, which in turn makes it a lose-lose proposition for him to say anything – beyond a variant of ‘no comment’’.

BUT SENATOR ARLEN SPECTER WAS TARGETING
THE PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD AT THE SAME TIME: GEDDIT?
Now since there can be no question whatsoever that Senator Arlen Specter, a long-term associate of George Bush Sr. and his criminal cohorts, and a Senator for Pennsylvania, most certainly knows the score with regard to the intent, centred in Harrisburg, to embezzle The Queen’s loan funds of $6.2 trillion that are internationally mandated to be remitted to the securities account with Morgan Stanley, New York, of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., plus the $15.0+ billion that’s also payable to Mr Cottrell’s firm via the Paymaster, who has been specifically instructed to procure the necessary resolution IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE U.S. CONSTITUTION (special intelligence obtained by the Editor), you can readily imagine that Senator Specter has ‘raised the stakes’ rather more steeply than The American Spectator’s correspondent, will have realised.

A SHORT LIST OF PEOPLE WHO COULD GO TO JAIL
Just to select a few individuals enmeshed in this exposure who could go to jail given their knowledge of the Pennsylvania Fraud to embezzle the Queen’s loan funds and the $15.0+ billion payable to Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., that we have publicised, the following are manifestly vulnerable to indictment under the Misprision of Felony Statute referenced by Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter IF THEY HAVE FAILED TO REPORT IT TO THE AUTHORITIES:

• Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, Vice President of Penn Acceptance Corporation.

• Joseph Limongelli, President and Secretary, Penn Acceptance Corporation.

• Daniel Limogelli, Treasurer, Penn Acceptance Corporation.

• General Counsel to the Governor of Pennsylvania, Edward G. Rendell.

• Officials in the Governor’s Office of General Counsel.

• Officials in the Office of the Governor of Pennsylvania.

• Officials in the Pennsylvania Department of State generally.

• Officials in the Pennsylvania Department of State Corporation Department, including Sally Krow.

• Officials in the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue, including Julie A. Castillo.

• All Pennsylvania officials generally who are aware of the Pennsylvania Fraud
whether directly or via this website.

• Staffers working for Senator Arlen Specter.

• Staffers and personnel working for Congressman Joe Sestak.

• Staffers working for Vice President Joe Biden, from Pennsylvania.

• All White House staff who are aware of the Pennsylvania Fraud and its ramifications, including all White House staff who receive and read the transcripts that are fed to them daily of the telephone conversations of Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., Mr A. Clifton Hodges, lawyer for the CMKM/CMKX victims, and the Editor of this service.

• All Capitol Hill staffers ditto.

• All so-called ‘Mainstream’ press operatives who know all about the Pennsylvania Fraud and its context, not least from our reports, and have refrained either from reporting on it or reporting the matter to the appropriate authorities.

• Add further categories to taste.

BECAUSE OF COURSE IT’S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY. PERIOD.
And of course, since IT’S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY AND ABOUT NOTHING ELSE, we can assure you that Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter had more than Sestak-gate in mind when he ‘raised the stakes’ by suddenly invoking Misprision of Felony no less than three years after THIS SERVICE ALONE began proclaiming it at the top of almost every report published in this website series.

Which of course reconfirms that these reports are indeed read where it matters and that AT LONG LAST THE PENNY HAS DROPPED. The US Constitution is about to be rescued.

U.S. INTEREST RATES RISING AS THESE FOOLS TRY TO EMBEZZLE THE FUNDS AGAIN
Meanwhile, just to ‘connect’ briefly with what HAS been reported in the ‘Mainstream’ press, you will have noted that yields on the US Treasury 10-year note had risen from 3.8% on 12th March 2010 to 3.8990% on 25th March. On Tuesday 23rd March, the Treasury’s $44 billion auction of two-year debt was weaker than ‘expected’. On Wednesday 24th March, a US Treasury auction of $42 billion five-year debt securities also fell flat. And on Thursday 25th, demand for the $32 billion of seven-year debt was limp, with the yield having risen from 3.1% to 3.37% over the same period.

Well, what did the brainboxes at the Geithner Treasury expect? Having incurred $4.5 trillion of TOTALLY UNNECESSARY TREASURY DEBT in the space of just two fiscal years – equating to the total amount of Treasury debt incurred over the best part of a century – the Obama White House and the Geithner Treasury, assisted by Bernanke at the Federal Reserve, having opted to expand official debt out to infinity and thereby to mortgage the American taxpayer for ever rather than to refinance the US dollar in the private sector using the loan finance made available by the British Monarchical Power PRO BONO PUBLICO which they STOLE, are now face to face MUCH EARLIER THAN THEY EVER ANTICIPATED with the worst of all possible worlds, namely:

• Rising interest rates +

• The knock-on effects on the battered real economy, the ‘recovery’ of which has been entirely artificial and not even assisted by the so-called Stimulus Money, a large proportion of which may have been diverted for illegal trading operations and or bribes placed into offshore bank accounts (since frozen) of those legislators and associates WHO HAVE BEEN BOUGHT.

And here they are STILL TRYING TO EMBEZZLE THE QUEEN’S LOAN FUNDS and the $15.0 billion payable to Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., which are internationally mandated to be deployed to refinance the US Dollar in the private sector, delivering windfall tax receipts which will negate the necessity for this reckless, permissive and irresponsible, not to say criminal, US deficit financing.

No wonder the Editor has been astonished during his New York visit to discover that normally sober and refined, knowledgeable American middle class professional people have told him, one after the other, that these criminals should all be rounded up dealt with ‘as in time of war’.

• Sober Americans who one would never imagine harbouring
such thoughts have said this to the Editor repeatedly during this visit.

GOV. RENDELL RAISES TAXES, YET ‘BLOCKS’ THE $495 MILLION TAX WINDFALL
The New York Times Sunday Edition [28th March 2010] carries a front page report entitled ‘States Seek to Tax Services, from Head to Toe’, featuring the Pennsylvania Governor, Edward G. Rendell, whose proposed ‘hairshirt’ budget , which he says is ‘born out of necessity’, is now being debated in Harrisburg. It would tax services, including accounting, advertising and data processing.

Governor Rendell, who uses Barack Obama’s keyword ‘look’ when he wants to make a point, is quoted as telling the newspaper:

‘Look, I’m not a crazy tax guy. I know what we’ve cut [in] the last two years, and I know how deep and painful the cuts have been. So I know that in the future there’s going to have to be a revenue increase, and this is the best of the alternatives, obviously none of which we’re happy about’.

Instead of whining and wringing his hands in public for the benefit of the gullible New York Times, Pennsylvania Governor Rendell would make better use of his time by calling Ms. Sally Krow at the Pennsylvania State Department Corporation Bureau and instructing her to cease and desist from her Department’s bureaucratic obfuscation, interference with and fraudulent cover-up behaviour over Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., which, as Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., has informed the Governor himself in writing, will be paying the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania State windfall taxes of the order of $495 million on receipt of the $15.0+ billion payable to his corporation.

Rendell’s buddy, Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, Vice President of Penn Acceptance Corporation, was inserted illegally on the Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. corporate screen that’s maintained by the Department of State, so that these funds could be embezzled. Which makes Rendell’s observations to the newspaper quite extraordinarily duplicitous, dishonest, and disingenuous.

They won’t be embezzled, thanks not least to the decisive surveillance and exposure measures that have been taken; and Pennsylvania will indeed receive the windfall $495 million in taxes from Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., despite Governor Rendell’s best efforts to have the funds stolen.

And since Governor Rendell knows all about this matter, both because he and his structures are parties to the attempted embezzlement through the local Mafioso Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, and because he has been specifically informed about the tax windfall by Mr Cottrell himself in writing, the ‘debate’ over the budget in Harrisburg, is as duplicitous, hypocritical and disingenuous as the Governor’s whining to The New York Times.

Either he doesn’t understand what’s going on under his nose (as George Orwell intimated), or he’s acting stupid. Since he is aware that $495 million is in the pipeline destined for the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue, if he were doing his job properly, he should inform his Legislature of this fact, and adjust his budget to take account of this forthcoming tax windfall, accordingly.

THE N.S.A.-CHENEY-BIDEN ‘BLACK OPS’ TERRORIST
PSY-OPS OFFENSIVE AGAINST COTTRELL AND STORY
Finally, before we expose (below) the latest dimension of the Pennsylvania Fraud, involving Joe Biden’s buddy Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, we need to address the related issue, mentioned above, of the concerted and counterproductive NSA Psy-Ops ‘Black Ops’ campaign that has been waged relentlessly without a break against the Editor of this service, ever since February 2008, when the Wanta ‘switch’ was being consolidated and it was realised that the Editor of this service would no longer be at Wanta’s disposal. Wanta, of course, as we have exposed, works for George Bush Sr. and was the courier between Bush Sr. and Gorbachëv.

• He specialises in facilitating ongoing embezzlement operations by Godfather Bush.

During the period when the Editor was deceived by Wanta and Wanta usurped our publishing and website platform for his own (i.e. Bush’s and Cheney’s) agenda, as previously reported, the French Embassy in Washington, D.C., under M. Levitte, who is now President Sarkozy’s main (intelligence) adviser, promoted our reports worldwide through the French Intelligence Power’s global network – vastly expanding our coverage and leaving us with an asset of considerable reach and power.

As one perceptive Christian friend of the Editor’s in the New York area pointed out on 25th March, quoting scripture: ‘They meant it for evil but God meant it for good’!

When Cheney’s operatives realised that there was a danger that the Editor would henceforth use his website and publishing platform in a manner contrary to the interests of the Bush-Cheney-DVD kleptocracy, Cheney orchestrated the launch of a Py-Ops operation targeted specifically against the Editor of this service. This has had zero impact, but has played into our hands as it has provided us with a means of assessing how effective our exposures have been, and how agitated the demons have become. The more agitated they become, the more effective our exposures have been.

The Psy-Ops campaign, using just one demented paid hack who masquerades literally as a demon (and is certainly infested himself, judging by the Editor’s knowledge of demonic possession taught to him by his late friend Malachi Martin, who died in July 1999 (only a week after asking the Editor to renew his subscription to Soviet Analyst)), consists of the following ingredients:

• Obsessive verbal terrorism conveyed by phone using our 1-800 number so that WE pay for the privilege of being mocked, insulted and ridiculed by this demented ‘Black Ops’ terrorist USG cadre.

• Routine unsolicited voicemail messages consisting of a demonic cackle, a rant along the lines of ‘The Great Dark Lords’ will take over the planet and there is nothing you fools can do about it, and ending with contrived demonic false ‘laughter’.

• Obscene (really filthy) imprecations against the Editor’s distinguished father, who died in 1984.

• Obscene and foul denunciations and utterances always against Jesus Christ and Christianity, containing ignorant rants, sordid allusions and vapid imprecations, interrupted by demonic cackles.

• Note: ‘The devils also believe, and tremble’: James, Chapter 2, verse 19.

• Endless filthy observations, demonic laughter and false hilarity following rants to the effect that ‘you cannot win’ and ‘we have stolen all the money’.

• Occasional ‘why don’t you join us?’ suggestions, implying that we are effective (accurate), book-ended by the usual false demonic cackling, imprecations against Jesus Christ and dirty laughter.

• Repeated telephone calls along the above lines, which these days may amount to a dozen or more such harassment interventions daily. With the US criminalists’ increasing desperation, the number of these verbal terrorism calls perpetrated by this filthy USG ‘Black Ops’ cadre has soared.

• The proven stealing of our communications [see below]: i.e., we pay for these dirty USG calls.

STEALING OUR TELECOMMUNICATIONS; A FEDERAL OFFENCE
In recent weeks, this Psy-Ops operation has been extended to Michael C. Cottrell – a stupid, base, brainless move by the dunderheads running this operation, as of course this has simply confirmed what we know from other sources – namely, that this counterproductive Psy-Ops offensive, which seeks to demoralise us and to insist that ‘we cannot win’ when that is precisely what is happening, is DIRECTLY RELATED to our very successful resistance to the repeated attempts to EMBEZZLE the Queen’s loan funds, to steal the funds payable to Penn Sylvania Investments, Inc., and to frustrate, postpone, torpedo, jeopardise, encumber, complicate, hijack, divert or otherwise interfere with the internationally mandated transparent US Dollar Refunding Programme.

With the broadening of this mad and counterproductive Psy-Ops offensive to Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., we have been advised by reliable ‘special’ inside sources, which include the Paymaster, that this IS a cack-handed NSA Cheney (MK-Ultra-type) operation, which has continued under Vice President Biden, who as indicated ‘controls’ the NSA. Biden ‘inherited’ this ‘Black Ops’ offensive.

FEATURES OF THIS COUNTERPRODUCTIVE U.S.G. ‘PSY-OPS’
OPERATION LASTING FOR MORE THAN TWO YEARS ALREADY
Records of earlier such nuisance calls over two years are held in our London office. Meanwhile, during the Editor’s New York visit to date, the following ‘Great Dark Lords’ NSA Cheney-Biden-DVD harassment terrorist phone calls (listed below) have been monitored. Several features of this US Government-sponsored dirty tricks offensive against the Editor in particular have been identified:

(1): The perpetrator STEALS OUR COMMUNICATIONS by employing our published 1-800 number to deposit his load of filth on our voicemail. Stealing electronic communications is a Federal offence, and on Monday 29th March 2010, the Editor will be taking immediate and comprehensive steps to have this outrageous USG ‘Black Ops’ offensive traced and shut down by greatly complicating the lives of personnel at the carrier, itself an intelligence entity, which is permissively allowing this abuse to continue AND CHARGING THIS COMPANY for the privilege of the gross, childish insults, obscenities, blasphemies, verbal terrorism and calumnies against the Editor’s father for which this US Government abomination is criminally responsible.

(2): As we have caller ID in the New York office, we can immediately identify a rogue incoming call. During the present New York visit to date, the Editor has recorded as many of these ‘Black Ops’ calls as he can when physically present in the office.

Note: Because of the arrangement that we have in the New York office to capture our Western Hemisphere incoming phone calls, and as a matter of convenience, we have a loop arrangement whereby the 1-800 calls are routed to the London office automatically. When the Editor is in New York, the calls are re-routed from London back to New York. When a call using our 1-800 number arrives in the New York Office, a ‘ping’ occurs on the receiving phone, and a few seconds later the other land line receives the incoming call. When in the New York office, the Editor is therefore able to identify incoming callers that dialled the 1-800 number. Because of this arrangement, we are able to prove that the base perpetrator working for the NSA/Cheney/Biden is illegally STEALING OUR COMMUNICATIONS, and in the appended list below, those calls are identified.

(3): The record kept by the Editor of the incoming ‘Black Ops’ rogue calls has identified a rota of phone numbers, as listed here. When called back, the standard ‘Your call cannot be completed as dialled’ is heard. In other words, these dummy phone numbers registered by our Caller ID service are therefore intelligence numbers.

(4): With the high level of success that we have achieved behind the scenes in bringing these matters close to their necessary conclusion, the perpetrator has daily become more and more frantic, repeating his attempts to get through so that he can dump his latest load of pointless and counterproductive verbal terrorism obscenities on our voicemail. The nutcase has lost his cool.

(5): The perpetrator has the capacity of repeating a frustrated attempt to get through (if we pick the receiver up and slam it down) immediately, but from a different telephone number as registered on our Caller ID facility. This can only be done by a ‘Black Ops’ intelligence cadre.

(6): As noted, this ‘Black Ops’ offensive against the Editor, which has been conducted without a break by these maniacs since February 2008, has in recent weeks been extended to Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. Therefore:

(7): All things considered above, this is a deliberate, orchestrated dirty tricks ‘Black Ops’ offensive implemented by these desperate, filthy criminals lodged inside the US official structures which is supposed to demoralise us and make us ‘go away’. But when Hitler tried to demoralise the British people by bombing British cities, the British people stuck two fingers up in defiance at him, so that the entire bombing operation proved counterproductive.

• As noted above, it has been CONFIRMED to us from inside ‘special’ sources that this is a Cheney operation run through the National Security Agency, inherited by Biden.

In our case, not only has this disgraceful, low, dirty-minded rogue US Government verbal terrorism operation had absolutely no effect, but it has revealed to us loud and clear just how successful our exposures have been and continue to be, in thrusting a steel wrench and a muzzle onto and into the snout of the Unclean Beast and hauling him into an environment known as: ‘Rule of Law’.

The beast is filthy dirty, stinks, emits foul belches, utters imprecations and obscenities, most of which seem to be linked with homosexuality, and is now beside itself because for the past two years and more, this entire costly operation has proved to be a complete waste of its belching time.

And furthermore, the Beast has been caught stealing our US communications – a careless mistake typical of these reckless brainwashed basket cases who take risks as a matter of course.

And remember: THEY NEVER IMAGINED THERE COULD EVER BE ANY EFFECTIVE OPPOSITION.
Which is why the Beast is mad. And why he calls us on Sunday at 6:31 a.m. to have another belch.

CHENEY/BIDEN/NSA ‘BLACK OPS’ VERBAL TERRORISM PHONE CALLS RECEIVED IN OUR OFFICES: THIS IS DELIBERATE U.S. GOVERNMENT HARASSMENT BECAUSE WE ARE HITTING THE CRIMINALISTS’ NERVES AND ARE REFUSING TO BE INTIMIDATED AND TERRORISED
The tiresome detail of ‘NSA/Cheney/Biden ‘Black Ops’ Psy-Ops MK-ULTRA harassment ‘devil’ phone calls against the Editor of this service monitored during this New York visit is as follows:

17 March: 3.40 p.m.

19 March: 213-284 4199*:
All accessed via our 1-800 Number: stealing our telecommunications:
12:50 p.m.; 12: 51 p.m.; 12:52 p.m.; 12:53 p.m.; 01:24 p.m.; 05:44 p.m.

20 March: 213-284 4199*:
Accessed via our 1-800 Number: stealing our telecommunications:
1:24 p.m.

22 March:
All accessed via our 1-800 Number: stealing our telecommunications:
7:52 p.m.: 213-286 4100*
8:09 p.m.: ‘Out of Area’.

23 March:
Accessed via our 1-800 Number: stealing our telecommunications:
10:56 a.m: 213-286 4100*

24 March
All accessed via our 1-800 Number: stealing our telecommunications:
12:53 12:54 p.m.: ‘Out of Area’.: 213-325 3300
12:54 p.m.: ‘Out of Area’.
12:54 p.m.: ‘Out of Area’.
3:57 p.m.: 213-286 4199*
3:57 p.m.: 000-012 3456 Note immediate number switch. (Caller ID data)
4:09 p.m.: 213-286 4199*
9:03 p.m.: 213-286 4199*
9:16 p.m.: 000-012 3456
11:36 p.m.: 213-325 3300

26 March:
All accessed via our 1-800 Number: stealing our telecommunications:
12:00 noon
12:22 p.m.
3:46 p.m.: 213-325 3500
3:47 p.m.: 000-012 3456
3:48 p.m.: 213-325 3500
3:56 p.m.: 213-325 3500

27 March:
All accessed via our 1-800 Number: stealing our telecommunications:
11:57 a.m.: 213-286 4199*
12:37 p.m.: 000-012 3456
1:21 p.m.: 213-286 4199*
1:21 p.m.: ‘Out of Area’. Note immediate number switch.
1:29 p.m.: 213-286 4199*
1:30 p.m.: ‘Out of Area’.
2:06 p.m.: 213-286 4199*
2:06 p.m.: 213-286 4199*

* Traced to Teleport Communications, Los Angeles, CA.

28 March [Sunday]:
6:31 a.m.: 213-286 4199*
6:43 a.m.: ‘Out of Area’.
Landline disconnected.

6: 49 a.m.: Unable to get through to utter obscene imprecations against the Editor, the paid hack working for Cheney/Biden/NSA called Michael C. Cottrell at this hour to verbally terrorise him.

29 March [Monday] FOLLOWING POSTING OF THIS REPORT:
6.47 a.m.: ‘Out of Area’.
6:52 a.m.: 213-286 4199*
First landline disconnected.
Six further illegal attempts via our 1-800 number stealing our communication every few minutes.
Second landline disconnected.

• Note: It is clear that we have hit a nerve. Measures have now been taken to terminate this verbal terrorism perpetrated by the sick Cheney/Biden/NSA cadre. No doubt they think they are above the law as they deny the Rule of Law, and think they have carte blanche to continue perpetrating verbal terrorism against the Editor irrespective of this exposure. We will NOT BE INTIMIDATED.

There are also indications of some Canadian involvement. Under a disgraceful ‘Black Ops’ bilateral agreement between the US Intelligence Power and Canadian Intelligence, the Canadians spy on US citizens, and the Americans spy on Canadian citizens. That way, both have false ‘deniability’ and can state that they do not spy on their own citizens (or, in the case of Canada, subjects). The Canadian intelligence community is seriously corrupt and extremely unpleasant to have to deal with.

• Michael C. Cottrell has been attacked by the SAME ‘Psy-Ops’ operative who has been attacking the Editor since February 2008: for instance, during the Editor’s current New York visit Mr Cottrell was telephonically attacked inter alia as follows:

24 March: Three harassment calls from the Biden maniac.

26 March: Five harassment calls from the possessed nutcase working for Cheney’s NSA ‘Black Ops’ cadre under Biden: 4:00 p.m.; 4:01 p.m.; 4:03 p.m.; 4:07 p.m.; 4:08 p.m..

27 March: Harassment calls from the NSA-Cheney-Biden ‘Psy Ops’ maniac at 7:38 a.m. and 12: 52p.m.

SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO LINKED TO BIDEN:
THE NEW TWIST IN THE PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD
Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., owned by Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., with his wife Diane as a shareholder, was organised as Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Corporation Number 844244 filed on the 11th December 1984 by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of State Corporation Bureau approved by the signature of the Secretary of the Commonwealth of the day.

The corporation remains organised and incorporated as a Business Corporation under Section 204 of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law act of 5th May 1933 (P.L. 364 (15 P.S. Section 1204) for the following purposes as stated in the founding documents [copies of which we hold on file] filed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of State on 11th December 1984, namely: ‘To engage in and to do all lawful acts concerning any or all lawful business for which a corporation may be incorporated under the Business Corporation Law of Pennsylvania Act of May 5, 1933, P.L. 364, as amended’. And:

‘The term for which the corporation is to exist is: Perpetual’.

On 25th March 2010, Michael C, Cottrell, B.A., M.S., finally received a response from the following element of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s bureaucracy [see our reports dated 19th and 24th March for background]:

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Department of State
Corporation Bureau
401 North Street, Room 206
P.O. Box 8722
Harrisburg, PA 17105-8722
WWW.DOS.STATE.PA.US/CORPS

BUSINESS PROCESSING SECTION
717-787 1057

The document, dated 03/19/2010 was addressed to and contained the following:

RE: 844244
PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.

To Whom it May Concern:

The enclosed filing is being returned for the following reasons:

1. 125 – Per 15 PAQ C.S. 1110 we don’t file this information.
2. 134 – There is no provision in the General Associations Act that enables the Department of State to change a corporate officer. Please contact the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue in order to report your current corporate officers. Department of Revenue Bureau of Receipts & Control Department 280430 Harrisburg, PA 17128-0430
3. 161 – Your check has been deposited. Please return this notice along with your corrected filing. Failure to do so may result in further rejections.

In our report dated 24th March 2010, we published the following
segment which it is necessary to reproduce here:

MR COTTRELL’S LATEST STRUGGLES WITH
DELIBERATELY UNCOOPERATIVE AND ARROGANT PA OFFICIALS
The officials at the Department of State knew precisely who he was as soon as he called, and proceeded to front a barrage of excuses for their inaction to date, including: ‘We don’t do that’; and:’ You should be speaking to the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue, not to us’; plus words to the effect …‘We can send your filing fee ($70) back’.

After speaking later with the Department of Revenue (in the course of which stressful conversation he was of course cut off), and having been informed condescendingly that ‘he should know’ that changes in corporate officers and their designations needed to be forwarded on Pennsylvania Department of Revenue form REV-1605, Mr Cottrell managed to access form REV-1605 (which they don’t tell you how to access), and thus proceeded to complete the form, which he then submitted [see below] and which reads as follows [The Editor has a copy of the completed form on file]:

Pennsylvania Department of State
Bureau of Corporate Taxes
PO Box 280430
Harrisburg PA 17128-0430

REV-1605 CT (1-10) Schedule Co.
Names of Corporate Officers
Corporate Account ID: XXXXXX*
Corporate Officers:
President/Managing Partner SSN XXX-XX-XXXX* COTTRELL MICHAEL C.
Vice President SSN XXX-XX-XXXX* COTTRELL MICHAEL C.
Secretary SSN XXX-XX-XXXX* COTTRELL MICHAEL C.
Treasurer/Tax Manager SSN XXX-XX-XXXX* COTTRELL MICHAEL C.
Business Name: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.
EIN: XXXXXXXXX*
Street Address: 1157 West 7th Street
City: Erie
State: PA
Zip Code: 16502
Preparer’s Signature: [Signed] Michael C. Cottrell
Title: President, Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer
Telephone Number: (814) 455 9218
Date: 03/13/2010

* Known to the Editor of this service.

WICKED DIVERSIONARY TACTIC BY CORNERED
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE OFFICIALS:
REPRESENTING THAT PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
IS A HOLDING COMPANY, WHICH IS NOT THE CASE
Furthermore, as you will doubtless have observed:

• First, the General Associations Act cited in the Corporation Bureau document dated 03/19/2010 but only received by Mr Michael C. Cottrell on 25th March 2010 is NOT the legislation under which Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. is incorporated in perpetuity.

On the contrary, as stated above, the corporation remains organised and incorporated as a Business Corporation pursuant to Section 204 of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law act of 5th May 1933 (P.L. 364 (15 P.S. Section 1204) for the following purposes stated in the founding documents filed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of State on the 11th December 1984: ‘To engage in and to do all lawful acts concerning any or all lawful business for which a corporation may be incorporated under the Business Corporation Law of Pennsylvania Act of May 5, 1933, P.L. 364, as amended’.

• Secondly, the General Associations Act cited in the State Corporation Bureau document dated 03/19/2010 but only received by Mr Cottrell on 25th March 2010 applies to HOLDING COMPANIES, and Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., is NOT A HOLDING COMPANY. Therefore, the bureaucrats in the Corporation Department have WILFULLY introduced A NEW, DELIBERATE DIVERSIONARY OBFUSCATION RED HERRING that contains a typically duplicitous trap, because:

• Thirdly, if Mr Cottrell did not have his wits in permanent overdrive and were to submit to this latest deception, the consequence might be DEEMED TO BE that the status of his corporation had thereby been changed from the status of a Business Corporation to that of a Holding Company.

• In the fourth place, the Corporation Bureau fraudulently contrived effective 8th March 2010 to place the Vice-President of Penn Acceptance Corporation, of 2007 Highway, Suite 315, Pittston TWP, PA 18640-40 on the Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., screen, as ‘Secretary’ of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., and furthermore, REMOVED their fraudulent insertion of this Mafioso impostor after Mr Cottrell contacted the Governor of Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Department of State and the Department of Revenue.

They therefore both IMPOSED and later REMOVED the local Mafioso impostor’s name onto and off the Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. screen without being in any way CONSTRAINED from doing so by the General Associations Act or by any other Statute or impediment.

Which, as you will very readily concur, means that THIS IS ANOTHER DELIBERATE, CONTRIVED, WICKED BUREAUCRATIC DEVICE BY THE SERPENT TO OBFUSCATE THE SITUATION AND TO TRY TO CREATE NEW DIFFICULTIUES IN ORDER TO FRUSTRATE THE PAYMENT OF THE MONIES THAT ARE OVERDUE AND PAYABLE TO PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC….

• AND to DEPRIVE Pennsylvania of $495 million in desperately needed windfall tax revenues.

Furthermore, as you will observe from the above, we are able to prove with this report that this operation is being orchestrated by the Vice President of the United States, Mr Joseph Biden, from Pennsylvania, who thinks he’s another Cheney and can orchestrate the embezzlement of money like Cheney was accustomed to doing.

• In the fifth place, Mr Cottrell’s cheque on behalf of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., ‘has been deposited’ – i.e., the Corporation Bureau have TAKEN HIS MONEY. Since the CORRECT FORM REV-1605 of the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue was submitted on 23rd March 2010 as required by both the Department of Revenue and the Department of State, the screen for Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. should read as we stated on 24th March 2010, namely thus:

Pennsylvania Department of State
Corporations

Business Entity Filing

Business Name History
Name:
Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

Name Type: Current Name

Business Corporation – Domestic – Information
Entity Number: 844244
Status: Active
Entity Creation Date: 12/11/1984
State of Business: PA
Registered Office Address: 1157 West Seventh Street, Erie PA 16502-0
Mailing Address: 1157 West Seventh Street, Erie PA 16502-0

Officers:

Name: MICHAEL C. COTTRELL
Title: President
Address: 1157 West Seventh Street, Erie PA 16502-25

Name: MICHAEL C. COTTRELL
Title: Vice President
Address: 1157 West Seventh Street, Erie PA 16502-25

Name: MICHAEL C. COTTRELL
Title: Secretary
Address: 1157 West Seventh Street, Erie PA 16502-25

Name: MICHAEL C. COTTRELL
Title: Treasurer/Tax Manager
Address: 1157 West Seventh Street, Erie PA 16502-25

THEY TOOK MR COTTRELL’S FILING MONEY
BUT DIDN’T CHANGE THE PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC. SCREEN
As at the time and date of this posting, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Corporation Bureau screen for Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., reads as follows:

Pennsylvania Department of State
Corporations

Business Entity Filing

Business Name History
Name:
Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

Name Type: Current Name

Business Corporation – Domestic – Information
Entity Number: 844244
Status: Active
Entity Creation Date: 12/11/1984
State of Business: PA
Registered Office Address: 1157 West Seventh Street, Erie PA 16502-0
Mailing Address: 1157 West Seventh Street, Erie PA 16502-0

Officers:

Name: MICHAEL C. COTTRELL
Title: President
Address: 1157 West Seventh Street, Erie PA 16502-25*

*Note: Having examined several screens for Pennsylvania Corporations including that of Penn Acceptance Corporation, it is noted that the entry against ‘Registered Office Address’ always has the zip code number followed by: -0; whereas the addresses of the officers have the zip code with two different digits, so that in Mr Cottrell’s case, the zip against the officers would read: 16502-25. [In the report dated 24th March 2010, we stated that the officers would have an address zip code: 16502-0. This has been corrected to: 16502-25 in accordance with the Corporation Bureau norm].

SO, MR COTTRELL FAXED THE GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA’S OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL, THE GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA, EDWARD G. RENDELL, THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE CORPORATION DEPARTMENT AND THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ALL OVER AGAIN, WITH ALL THE DOCUMENTS.

THAT WAY, A MASSIVE PAPER TRAIL PERTINENT
TO ‘MISPRISION OF FELONY’ IS ON THE RECORD
Since, despite banking Mr Cottrell’s cheque on behalf of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Corporation Bureau has STILL CONTRIVED NOT TO DISPLAY THE AMENDMENTS REQUIRED BY MR COTTRELL PER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE FORM REV-1605 [see above], Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. faxed and refaxed the documents identified in the following FAX COVER sheets to the named recipients at the times specified below on 26th March 2010 and on the earlier dates also specified herewith:

………………………………………………………………

(1): Governor’s Office of General Counsel:
Faxed 26th March 2010: 11:27 a.m. to 11: 48 a.m.

PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814- 453 4453
Email: pii-mcc@msn.com

TO: Governor’s Office of General Counsel
333 Market Street, 17th Floor
Harrisburg, PA 17101

REF: Pennsylvania Department of State
FRAUDULENT ENTRY ON www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp

RE: FRAUD AGAINST THIS FIRM STILL CONTINUES:
PERPETRATED B Y VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN
AND SALVATORE DEFRANCESCO et al.

VIA: FAX (717) 772-8570

ITEMS ENCLOSED:
[Note: We are not displaying these items here except to reproduce again, as Appendix 1, the Letter of Notification regarding the Fraudulent Entry of Salvatore DeFrancesco, as we did for the report dated 24th March 2010; and we also reproduce, as Appendix 2, The Certificate of Adoption of Corporate Resolution dated 3/13/2010].

(1): FORM REV-1605 – Completed, Signed and Dated.

(2): (1): Letter of Notification regarding: Fraudulent Entry on www.corporations.state.pa.u.s/corp by person(s) unknown against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. [3/8.2010]: 3 Pages
Exhibit “A”-1, Exhibit “B”:-1 thru 4, Exhibit “D”-1 & 2.

(3) COPIES 1 & 2 OF ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT – DOMESTIC
CORP (15, Pa. C.S.) PER DEPARTMENT OF STATE INSTRUCTIONS;

• EXHIBIT A – CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION OF CORPORATE RESOLUTION DATED 3/13/2010.

[Note: They don’t want this document on file: see Appendix 2 below].

• COPY OF PERSONAL CHECK FOR $70.00 USD.

• COPY OF SIGNED DELIVERY AND ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS BY DEPARTMENT OF STATE [dated] 18 MARCH 2010.

NOTE: STILL AS OF THIS DATE, THERE HAS BEEN NO CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN TO RECTIFY THE FRAUDULENT SITUATION THAT CAN PREVENT THIS FIRM’S LEGAL AND LAWFUL RECEIPT OF FIFTEEN BILLION+ UNITED STATES DOLLARS.

[Signed]:
MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S.
PRESIDENT, CEO, TREASURER AND SECRETARY
3-26-2010

Page 1 of 38 pages.

………………………………………………………………

(2): The Honorable Edward G. Rendell
Governor of Pennsylvania
Faxed 25th March 2010: 6:13 p.m. to 6:32 p.m.

PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814- 453 4453
Email: pii-mcc@msn.com

TO: The Honorable Edward G. Rendell
Governor of Pennsylvania
225 Main Capitol Building
Harrisburg, PA 17120

REF: Department of State
Department of Revenue

RE: REV-1605 FORM

VIA: FAX (717) 772-8264

ITEMS ENCLOSED:
[Note: We are not displaying these items here except to reproduce again, as Appendix 1, the Letter of Notification regarding the Fraudulent Entry of Salvatore DeFrancesco, as we did for the report dated 24th March 2010; and we also reproduce, as Appendix 2, The Certificate of Adoption of Corporate Resolution dated 3/13/2010].

(1): FORM REV-1605 – Completed, Signed and Dated.

(2): (1): Letter of Notification regarding: Fraudulent Entry on www.corporations.state.pa.u.s/corp by person(s) unknown against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. [3/8.2010]: 3 Pages
Exhibit “A”-1, Exhibit “B”:-1 thru 4, Exhibit “D”-1 & 2.

(3) COPIES 1 & 2 OF ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT – DOMESTIC
CORP (15, Pa. C.S.) PER DEPARTMENT OF STATE INSTRUCTIONS;

• EXHIBIT A – CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION OF CORPORATE RESOLUTION DATED 3/13/2010.

[Note: They don’t want this document on file: see Appendix 2 below].

• COPY OF PERSONAL CHECK FOR $70.00 USD.

• COPY OF SIGNED DELIVERY AND ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS BY DEPARTMENT OF STATE [dated] 18 MARCH 2010.

[Signed]:
MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S.
PRESIDENT, CEO, TREASURER AND SECRETARY
3-25-2010

Page 1 of 31 pages

………………………………………………………………

(3): Pennsylvania Department of State
CORPORATION BUREAU
Faxed 23rd March 2010: 11:00 a.m.. to 11:15 a.m.

PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814- 453 4453
Email: pii-mcc@msn.com

TO: Pennsylvania Department of State
CORPORATION BUREAU
Harrisburg, PA 17105-8722

ATTN: SALLY KROW

RE: REV-1605 FORM

VIA: FAX (717) 783-2244

ITEMS ENCLOSED:
[Note: We are not displaying these items here except to reproduce again, as Appendix 1, the Letter of Notification regarding the Fraudulent Entry of Salvatore DeFrancesco, as we did for the report dated 24th March 2010; and we also reproduce, as Appendix 2, The Certificate of Adoption of Corporate Resolution dated 3/13/2010].

(1): FORM REV-1605 – Completed, Signed and Dated.

(2): (1): Letter of Notification regarding: Fraudulent Entry on www.corporations.state.pa.u.s/corp by person(s) unknown against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. [3/8.2010]: 3 Pages
Exhibit “A”-1, Exhibit “B”:-1 thru 4, Exhibit “D”-1 & 2.

(3) COPIES 1 & 2 OF ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT – DOMESTIC
CORP (15, Pa. C.S.) PER DEPARTMENT OF STATE INSTRUCTIONS;

• EXHIBIT A – CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION OF CORPORATE RESOLUTION DATED 3/13/2010.

[Note: They don’t want this document on file: see Appendix 2 below].

• COPY OF PERSONAL CHECK FOR $70.00 USD.

• COPY OF SIGNED DELIVERY AND ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS BY DEPARTMENT OF STATE [dated] 18 MARCH 2010.

[Signed]:
MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S.
PRESIDENT, CEO, TREASURER AND SECRETARY
3-23-2010

Page 1 of 29 pages

………………………………………………………………

(4): Pennsylvania Department of Revenue
Faxed 23rd March 2010: 10:42 a.m. to 10:59 a.m.

PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814- 453 4453
Email: pii-mcc@msn.com

TO: Pennsylvania Department of Revenue
P.O. Box 280430
Harrisburg, PA 17128-0430

ATTN: Bureau of Corporation Taxes

RE: REV-1605 FORM

VIA: FAX (717) 705-6227

ITEMS ENCLOSED:
[Note: We are not displaying these items here except to reproduce again, as Appendix 1, the Letter of Notification regarding the Fraudulent Entry of Salvatore DeFrancesco, as we did for the report dated 24th March 2010; and we also reproduce, as Appendix 2, The Certificate of Adoption of Corporate Resolution dated 3/13/2010].

(1): FORM REV-1605 – Completed, Signed and Dated.

(2): (1): Letter of Notification regarding: Fraudulent Entry on www.corporations.state.pa.u.s/corp by person(s) unknown against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. [3/8.2010]: 3 Pages
Exhibit “A”-1, Exhibit “B”:-1 thru 4, Exhibit “D”-1 & 2.

(3) COPIES 1 & 2 OF ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT – DOMESTIC
CORP (15, Pa. C.S.) PER DEPARTMENT OF STATE INSTRUCTIONS;

• EXHIBIT A – CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION OF CORPORATE RESOLUTION DATED 3/13/2010.

[Note: They don’t want this document on file: see Appendix 2 below].

• COPY OF PERSONAL CHECK FOR $70.00 USD.

• COPY OF SIGNED DELIVERY AND ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS BY DEPARTMENT OF STATE [dated] 18 MARCH 2010.

[Signed]:
MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S.
PRESIDENT, CEO, TREASURER AND SECRETARY
3-23-2010

Page 1 of 29 pages

………………………………………………………………

IN MEMORIAM AND HORIZONTALISATION NEWS:

MANAGING DIRECTOR OF THE ABU DHABI INVESTMENT AUTHORITY [SCAMMED BY BUSH]
Ahmed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the Managing Director of the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, was reported by the Morrocan official news agency MAP to be ‘missing’ after his ‘glider’ crashed into a lake in Morocco on Friday 26th March 2010. The pilot of the craft was rescued ‘in good condition’. Sheikh Al Nahyan was the younger brother of Sheikh Khalifa, Ruler of the United Arab Emirates.

The glider went down near the Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdullah Dam, which forms the lake, located in the Atlantic coastal region near the town of Skhirat, about 35 kilometres south of the Moroccan capital, Rabat. One of the Moroccan royal palaces is located in Skhirat.

Although the AIDA issued its first-ever annual statement literally last week, the document contained no information on the entity’s balance sheet or on the overall size of the fund’s holdings. That’s not surprising because its balance sheet is stuffed with worthless derivative assets, AIDA having been exploited by the Bush Crime Family’s Fraudulent Finance operations.

Whether Al Nahyan was pushed out of the craft over the lake may never be known, of course.

• Barbara Bush in hospital:
Naturally, the foregoing has nothing whatsoever to do with the Houston Chronicle’s 28th March 2010 report that Mrs Barbara Bush, aged 84, who is said to have gained control over some of her husband’s affairs, was admitted to the local Methodist Hospital for ‘routine tests’, according to Jean Becker, George Bush Sr.’s Chief of Staff. Mrs Bush, who underwent surgery to replace her aortic valve in March 2009, was expected to be released ‘in a day or two’.

• On 27th March, a London metals trader, Andrew Maguire, who warned an investigator for the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the CFTC) in advance about an intended gold and silver market manipulation operation planned by traders at JPMorgan Chase in February 2010, and whose whistleblowing was publicised by a gold lobby representative at a CFTC hearing held on 25th March 2010 on metals futures trading, was injured with his wife when their car was struck by a hit-and-run driver in the London area. The couple were admitted to the nearest hospital with minor injuries but are expected to recover fully. In a report to a colleague, Mr Maguire said that his car was rammed, apparently deliberately, by a vehicle that rushed out of a side road. The rogue driver was caught by police after a chase in which police helicopters were deployed.

• Note: We will be migrating the crisis-linked In Memoriam and Horizontalisation News spot to the upgraded website when it’s ready, and at that stage we will incorporate the sizeable file of cases that have accumulated since we last updated the list [Archive].

The series will be maintained in a new facility to be added to the website entitled Databank, which will hold lists and other accumulated data published in the reports Archive.

………………………………………………………………

APPENDIX 1:

MICHAEL C. COTTRELL’S LETTER OF NOTIFICATION OF 9TH MARCH 2010 TO THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE DEMANDING THE IMMEDIATE REMOVAL OF THE NAME OF THE MAFIA IMPOSTOR SALVATORE DE FRANCESCO FROM THE PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC. STATE CORPORATION BUREAU’S OFFICIAL SCREEN, FRAUDULENTLY SHOWING THE IMPOSTOR MAFIOSO AS ‘SECRETARY’ OF THE CORPORATION:

(1): FAX COVER
PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814- 453 4453
Email: pii-mcc@msn.com

TO: Pennsylvania Department of State
401 North Street, Room 206
P.O. Box 8722
Harrisburg, PA 17105-8721

Attention: Ms. Butler, Supervisor

Via: Fax: 717-783 2244

ITEMS ENCLOSED:
(1): Letter of Notification regarding: Fraudulent Entry on www.corporations.state.pa.u./corp by person(s) unknown against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. [3/8.2010]: 3 Pages
(2): Exhibit “A”: 12 Pages
(3): Exhibit “B”: 5 Pages
(4): Exhibit “C”: 3 Pages
(5): Exhibit “D”: 15 Pages.

Number of pages including cover: 39
9 March 2010
………………………………………………………………

(2): LETTER OF NOTIFICATION TO
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE:

PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814- 453 4453
Email: pii-mcc@msn.com

TO: Pennsylvania Department of State
401 North Street, Room 206
P.O. Box 8722
Harrisburg, PA 17105-8721

Attention: Ms. Butler, Supervisor

Reference:
Due Diligence Accounts Payable [Nov 19th, 2004 to March 25th, 2008]

RE: FRAUDULENT ENTRY ON www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp BY PERSON(S) unknown against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. (3/8/2010)

Via: Fax: 717-783 2244/ AND U.S. MAIL

Dear Ms. Butler:
Per our conversation this date, between approximately 9:34 a.m. EST and 9:40 a.m. EST, I stated to you that Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. is to receive funds in the amount of Fifteen Billion United States Dollars ($15,000,000,000.00 USD):

[Ref: Exhibit “B, Page 1” Payables Due with the Due Diligence Documentation Part 1 and Part 2, dated November 19, 2004 to March 23, 2008]

derived from a “Settlement” between the United States of America, the World Court, the People’s Republic of China, with the signed approval of President Barack Obama, and a loan of Six Point Two Trillion United States Dollars ($6,200,000,000,000.00 USD) to Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., via Her Majesty, the Queen of England (Sovereign of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) for the purpose of a Private Funding Refunding of the United States Dollar (Ref: Exhibit “B” Pages 2-4, an Affidavit submitted to Her Majesty, et al. On 29 December 2008).

Additionally, I stated to you that Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. (including Michael C. Cottrell) will pay an amount of Pennsylvania Corporate and Personal taxes of approximately Four Hundred and Ninety-Five Million United States Dollars ($495,000,000.00 USD) from this “Settlement” process.

Page 2: RE: FRAUDULENT ENTRY ON www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp BY PERSON(S) unknown against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. (3/8/2010):

However, the Pennsylvania Department of State has now become [a] knowing or unknowing participant in the ongoing fraudulent activities [being] attempted to divert said funds and the payment of Pennsylvania Corporate Taxes and/or to steal and place said funds in “off-balance sheet account(s)” with the aid of bank and political fraudsters – located in London (UK), Paris (France), Geneva (Switzerland), Houston and Dallas (Texas), Washington, D.C., and various locations in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

The above referenced fraudulent activity is evidenced by the placement of “SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO as SECRETARY” as Officer of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. screen dated March 8, 2010 WITHOUT a correspondent Amendment of Articles – WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE OR APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTORS/OWNERS OF PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.

Therefore, this corporation hereby demands that the name “SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO as SECRETARY” BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY FROM THE SCREEN PAGE IDENTIFYING ENTITY 844244: PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC., 1157 WEST 7TH STREET, ERIE PA 16502-0.

Further, this corporation demands an investigation and a FULL REPORT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS – as to who gave the authority for this name to be placed on said screen, what evidence [exists] of authorization granting said person the position of SECRETARY for this corporation, and what action will be taken against said person committing the fraudulent entry.

If the offending item is not removed immediately upon the facsimile receipt of this letter and documentation, this corporation will move legally for fraud against the Secretary of the Commonwealth, the Honorable Pedro A Cortes, et al., and against SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO (INDIVIDUALLY AND SEVERALLY) for Fraud against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., for THREE (3) TIMES DAMAGES, e.g., FORTY-FIVE BILLION UNITED STATES DOLLARS ($45,000,000,000.00 USD) – since the payment is IMMINENT and therefore the screen identified can be used to divert or steal the aforementioned funds, e.g. [for account of] FIDELITY DEPOSIT & DISCOUNT BANK, et al., and/or PENN ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, et al..

This firm has NO ACCOUNTS with either. The stated funds are to be deposited with this firm’s identified Securities Account at Morgan Stanley & Co, New York, NY.

Page 3: RE: FRAUDULENT ENTRY ON www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp BY PERSON(S) unknown against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. (3/8/2010):

Thank you for your immediate attention and assistance in this matter.

Regards,

Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S.
President, CEO and Secretary
Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502-1106

Reference:
Exhibit “A”: Pages 1 thru 11;
Exhibit “B”: Pages 1 thru 4;
Exhibit “C”: Pages 1 and 2;
Exhibit “D”: Pages 1 thru 13.

CC:
(1): The Honorable Edward G. Rendell, Governor of Pennsylvania
(2): The Honorable Pedro A Cortes, Secretary of the Commonwealth
(3): The Honorable Tom Corbett, Pennsylvania Attorney General
(4): Robert S. Cessar, United States Attorney, Pittsburgh, PA
(5): A. Clifton Hodges, Esq., Hodges and Associates, 4 East Holly Street,
Suite 202, Pasadena, CA 91103
(6): Mr William Bonney, Sr., BOLDCAP
(7): Mr Dana V. Wilcox

………………………………………………………………

APPENDIX 2:

Note:
This document [with introduction] was posted as the FOREWORD to our report dated 19th March 2010. The Pennsylvania Department of State are resisting the filing of this document

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT RE: PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC. DATED 13TH MARCH 2010:
Submitted with the $70 necessary filing fee to Pennsylvania Department of State, Corporation Bureau by Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., 1157 West 7th Street, Erie, PA 16502, on 15th March 2010. Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. was incorporated on 11th December 1984 under the following Pennsylvania Statute: 19 PA CODE CH. 35 (1933) P.L. 354, as amended. The Articles of Amendment stated that: ‘The amendment shall be effective on March 13th [2010] at 12:01 pm.’

The amendment was adopted by the Board of Directors pursuant to 15 Pa. C.S. Section 1914(c) or Section 5914(b). ‘The amendment adopted by the Corporation is set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof’. ‘In testimony whereof, the undersigned corporation has caused these Articles of Amendment to be signed by a duly authorized officer thereof this 13th day of March 2010: PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.

[Signed] Michael C. Cottrell: Title: PRESIDENT, CEO, SECRETARY AND TREASURER: 3/13/2010

Exhibit A forming an integral part of these Articles of Amendment:

PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814-453 4453
Email: pii-mcc@msn.com; pii3mcc@gmail.com

EXHIBIT “A”: 13 March 2010

CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION OF CORPORATE RESOLUTION

I hereby certify that at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Pennsylvania, held on the 13th day of MARCH, 2010 at which said meeting a quorum was present and acting throughout, the following resolutions were adopted and ever since have been and now are in full force and effect:

RESOLVED, that due to the attempted fraudulent devices indicated by the PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF STATE (www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp) of 8 MARCH 2010, et al., THIS CORPORATION HEREBY DECLARES any and all corporate resolutions pertaining to bank accounts excluding PNC ACCOUNT, ROBIN DRIVE, ERIE, PA, and all other Securities Accounts, excluding MORGAN STANLEY SECURITIES ACCOUNT (16 November 2005), as NULL AND VOID;

RESOLVED, that since this corporation has never granted a non-owner of shares of this corporation any directorship or office, it hereby grants Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., the retention of full authorities and powers as President, Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary, and is thereby granted full authorization and control of this corporation as per this duly authorized resolution;

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my signature
for said corporation this 13th day of March, 2010.

[Signed]:
Michael C. Cottrell, B.A, M.S.
President, CEO, Treasurer, & Secretary
Date: 3/13/2010

[Signed]:
Diane R. Cottrell, B.A., M.A.
(A.K.A. Diane R. Bertolini, B.A., M.A.)
Shareholder
Date: 3/13/2010

• Note: The Editor of this service holds copies
of these Articles of Amendment and of Exhibit “A” in our files.

………………………………………………………………

APPENDIX 3:

The following document was not included in the urgent fax sent by Mr Cottrell dated 9th March 2010 to the Pennsylvania Department of State but is included herewith for reference [and was included in our report dated 19th March 2010]:

PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814- 453 4453
Email: pii-mcc@msn.com

16 NOVEMBER 2005

CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION OF CORPORATE RESOLUTION

I hereby certify that at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, held on the 16th day of November 2005 at which said meeting a quorum was present and acting throughout, the following resolutions were adopted and ever since have been and now are in full force and effect:

RESOLVED,
that US Dollar account(s) be established at Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated located at 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10020.

RESOLVED,
that Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., as President and Secretary, is hereby empowered with full legal authority to sign any necessary documents to open and conduct business within said account(s) on behalf of this Corporation;

FURTHER RESOLVED, that Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., is hereby granted authority to make, execute, and deliver, any and all written instructions necessary or proper to effectuate the authority hereby conferred to sign any and all necessary documents required to execute instructions regarding activities within said account(s).

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my signature for said corporation this 16th day of November, 2005.

[Signed]
Michael C. Cottrell
President and Secretary
Date: 11-16-2005

[Signed]
Diane R Bertolini-Cottrell, B.A., M.A.
Shareholder
Date: 11-16-2005.

………………………………………………………………

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS ARE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

All securitisation is illegal under US and Common Law: see report dated 10th March 2010.

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time AMENDING AND INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE. In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

THREE DISTURBING ISSUES TO PONDER WHILE WE WAIT

cropped-chrisstory

FOR THE OUTCOME OF THE PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD INVESTIGATION, THAT IS

Monday 22 March 2010 06:00

• 22ND MARCH: 1:00PM EDT:
THIS REPORT HAS BEEN UPDATED: SEE SECTIONS LABELLED: NEW

• 23RD MARCH: 2:30PM EDT:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE BUNKER-BUSTING BOMBS IS APPENDED AT THE FOOT OF THIS REPORT. ISRAEL APPEARS TO BE ENGAGED IN DE FACTO NUCLEAR BLACKMAIL AGAINST THE UNITED STATES, ACCORDING TO DR ALAN SABROSKY, A PROMINENT JEWISH AMERICAN MILITARY ACADEMIC AND MARINE, WHOSE ASSESSMENTS ARE BEING WIDELY CIRCULATED.

• MACROFINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE PASSAGE OF THE U.S. HEALTH CARE BILL

• NEW: ILLEGAL ANTI-REPEAL PROVISION BURIED INSIDE THE BILL

• NEW: THIS IS THE MEASURE THAT PROSPECTIVELY CURBS OUTLAYS

• NEW: ANTI-REPEAL CLAUSE = CHANGE IN SENATE ‘PROCEDURES’, NOT IN SENATE RULES

• THE ILLEGALITY OF SECURITISATION – IN THREE NUTSHELLS

• THE NORTHERN ROCK CASE IN INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW

• PROSPECTIVE USE OF DIEGO GARCIA FOR BOMBING IRAN

• THE SUNDAY HERALD’S 21 MARCH 2010 ARTICLE ON U.S. ABUSE OF DIEGO GARCIA

SECURITIZATION IS ILLEGAL UPDATE: In the Subs/Books Update panel immediately below the NEWS panel that you are currently viewing, you will see an announcement concerning publication of Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 7 & 8. If you press that announcement text and open up the panel, you will see the contents list for the new [2010Q1] issue of E.I.R., including a breakdown of the Chapter Headings for the detailed analysis showing that Securitization is illegal. See our NEWS report dated 10th March 2010 for summaries of some of the data from this analysis. We understand that the report has created uproar in certain corridors of corrupt power.

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

Three issues related to our overall focus, that require immediate attention, are posted here for a short period – while the necessary further enquiries about the hijacked and delayed payments, and the consequences of the Pennsylvania Fraud, continue.

MACROFINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE PASSAGE OF THE U.S. HEALTH CARE BILL
The first is a pointed comment on the passage of the US Leninist Health Care financial pipeline, which will enable the financial criminals in high office and the banksters to refinance the next generation of financial scams.

Interestingly, we have been learning from potent anecdotal evidence in New York that it appears that a significant proportion of ordinary men and women in the US street understand very well that this so-called Health Care programme represents another unprecedented financial racketeering operation, although few people understand how it will work.

Correspondent Dick Eastman, who may be of Jewish extraction himself, sums the matter up rather succinctly, as follows:

HEALTH CARE PASSES:

• Medicine to be rationed politically.
• Mandatory insurance will simply deliver more premium capital to Wall Street.
• Jewish High Finance will determine what can be spared for operations, tests,
medication, hospitalization, etc.

• Note: You didn’t think the Money Power was going to let those Congressmen
out of that building without passing their bill, did you?

Here is the Leninist money-making scam that Americans have just been saddled with:

• Medicine to be rationed politically:
Compulsory insurance will simply deliver more premium capital to Wall Street.

This is because insurance companies invest on Wall Street the money premiums that they do not yet have to pay out; while government political rationing will mean that less and less is paid out: so that more and more of the premiums will remain in the hands of the criminal financial enterprises.

• Editor’s insert: This, friends, is how the financial enterprises will stay afloat and prosper, given that the US Dollar Refunding Programme is indeed to be handled in the private sector, as we have all along recommended, not by the Government.

• Editor’s further insert: Meanwhile, in accordance with Lenin’s textbook, High Finance will determine what can be spared for operations, tests, medication, and hospital care for the people.

If you are very nice to Barney Frank or Lloyd Blankfein, maybe one of them will let you have priority attention when your child needs an expensive life-saving operation.

• But more probably, they won’t want to know.

ILLEGAL ANTI-REPEAL PROVISION BURIED INSIDE THE BILL
Buried within the massive amendment to the Senate version of the Health Care legislation inserted by Senator Harry Reid of Nevada is an illegal clause which purports to bind Congress in the future from repealing Section 3403. In the United Kingdom, no House of Commons can bind its successor, and the same principle applies in the United States. The offending clause reads:

‘It shall not be in order in the Senate or the House of Representatives to consider any bill, resolution, amendment or conference report that would repeal or otherwise change this subsection’.

The subsection, starting on page 1,000 of this convoluted Talmudic legislation, concerns the regulatory power of the Independent Medicare Advisory Board (IMAB) to ‘reduce the per capita rate of growth of Medicare spending’.

THIS IS THE MEASURE THAT PROSPECTIVELY CURBS OUTLAYS AS EXPLAINED ABOVE
This is the measure that controls, curbs and prospectively reduces the aggregate value of payouts for health care services to Americans, thereby, as explained above, also CURBING payouts by the insurers to pay for the Medicare expenditures incurred – and thereby, in turn again, ensuring that as much of the insurance money remains invested on Wall Street (proxy for the financial markets and system generally) in order to maximise the potential for such funds to be diverted into illicit trading platforms and operations under the radar, contrary to the Law [see below].

ANTI-REPEAL CLAUSE = CHANGE IN SENATE ‘PROCEDURES’, NOT IN SENATE RULES
In order to procure the ‘legality’ of the provision that this subsection cannot ever be repealed or changed in the future, the (Reid-controlled) Senate Parliamentarian has ruled, in a classic example of nefarious ‘loopholeism’, that the anti-repeal provision does not constitute a change of Senate RULES, but rather of Senate ‘procedures’.

The reason for this is that for 200 years, changes in the Senate’s standing rules have required approval by two-thirds of those voting – that is to say, 67 votes, rather than the 60 votes that Senator Reid’s amendment received.

Thus Senator Harry Reid flouted two centuries of standing US Senate rules to pass a measure in the dead of night (which these Dark Forces always try to do) that no Senator has read, and part of which can never be changed (although the anti-repeal provision is illegal).

Senator Reid is reported to have tossed aside an earlier assurance that Senators and the public would have 72 hours to read the language of his contributions to the Senate measure – because if the existence of this clause had been highlighted in time, there might have been an uproar.

After approving the House of Representatives’ bill by 219 to 212 votes on Sunday 21st March 2010, the House adopted a package of changes to it by a vote of 220 to 211.

The package, which was agreed to in negotiations between House and Senate Democrats and the White House, goes to the Senate probably this week.

THE ILLEGALITY OF SECURITISATION IN THREE NUTSHELLS
With reference to our demonstration that all securitisation is illegal under US and Common Law [see report dated 10th March 2010: Archive], there is a trinity of relevant rules or tenets which have their origins in Common (Anglo-Saxon) Law and that can be summed up thus:

(1): No one can contract with another or others to commit a crime or an illegal act.
All such contracts are void.

(2): Only those who are party to the ORIGINAL contract can derive benefit from it, or are obliged to honour its conditions and warranties (Privity of Contract).

Others subsequently deemed to be bound by the contract (by means of assignment) must be made known to all who are party to the ORIGINAL agreement prior to the assignment, with express and adequate notice given and the opportunity offered to discharge all (undisputed) obligations.

(3): In Common Law, the right of assignment does not exist (at least it doesn’t under English Law); although assignment is made possible by virtue of a succession of statutes, but only when strict conditions have been met and are adhered to.

The most important of these is that express and adequate notice HAS to be given, with the
right at all times for any party to discharge any (undisputed) debt or other obligation to the
original counterparty(ies) – and to an assignee only by agreement.

Anyone who challenges this trinity of established legal doctrine is on shaky ground.

The enumerated points above comprise some of the ‘bedrock’ of contract law and if an operator follows this line of thinking to its (il)logical conclusion, and assumes that it is legal to ‘securitise’ assets which are not owned (such as mortgages) but in some contrived or artificial way ‘leased’, then any profits accruing from the ‘lease’ or ‘sale’ (note the parentheses here) of such assets belong to the ORIGINAL parties to the contract, in accordance with the legal maxim:

• ‘The money you make from exploiting my money is my money’.

If your mortgage has been ‘sold on’, ‘bundled’, ‘trafficked’ or exploited in such a way as to generate a profit, you are entitled to some of (probably all of) that profit.

If this is refused, you can demand that the original lender of the mortgage finance who ‘sold on’, ‘bundled’, ‘trafficked’ or exploited your mortgage without reference to you as mortgagor, be
held responsible for repaying the principal and all interest owing.

In the United States, the choice lies between proper conformity with the above, or a R.I.C.O. action requiring the perpetrator(s) upon conviction to pay the capital sum plus interest plus three times damages plus other damages for breach (of the original contract). The perpetrators rely primarily on the ignorance of victims and on the general distrust of the legal system that they encourage.

THE NORTHERN ROCK CASE IN INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW
In the Northern Rock case in the United Kingdom that International Currency Review is showcasing in the forthcoming issue [Volume 35, Numbers 1 & 2], the British lender’s predicament is that it lied repeatedly to the former mortgagor about the actual status of her Title Deeds which Northern Rock withheld from her for five years – even informing her in writing at one stage that her Title Deeds had been ‘dematerialised’, before all of a sudden disgorging them (under pressure, no doubt, from British Government lawyers) in June 2009: five years after they should have been handed over in recognition of the fact that the mortgagor had fully paid off her mortgage earlier (which was never factored in to the lender’s calculations).

During the five years when Northern Rock withheld the lady’s Title deeds illegally, she could not move home, as the original Title Deeds were needed for that purpose. That behaviour represented an illegal deprivation by Northern Rock of the mortgagor’s right to move home when she chooses.

PROSPECTIVE USE OF DIEGO GARCIA FOR BOMBING IRAN
The British-owned territory of Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean, which is leased under some mad and typically misguided agreement to the Americans, is reportedly being stockpiled with bunker-busting bombs for a possible attack on Iran.

Until 21st March 2010, reports of this development were unstable and could not be verified. But, believe it or not, there is an exception to our general rule that the British media are diversionary, controlled and intimidated by the intelligence cells resident inside press rooms (intelligence cells are resident inside press rooms of the leading press and broadcast media in both the United States and Britain: that’s how the press is controlled at the point of delivery).

The exception to this rule is Scotland’s Sunday Herald, which has an enviable reputation for ‘doing its own thing’ in open defiance of the Establishment – an attitude which, obviously, we admire.

Sure enough, the Sunday Herald has just covered the Diego Garcia issue, which we ourselves are extremely concerned about – not least since in our opinion the American Government, which has cynically colluded in the stealing of The Queen’s gold and in the unconscionable diversion of the sovereign Refunding Loan of $6.2 trillion that was delivered to Bank of New York Mellon on 19th-20th July 2007 for that purpose, should be kicked out of bases on British territory.

In a break with our usual practice of complaining that the cowed British ‘mainstream’ doesn’t do its job properly, we now go to the opposite extreme and display herewith the complete Sunday Herald article on this subject, published on 21st March 2010:

THE SUNDAY HERALD’S 21 MARCH 2010 ARTICLE ON U.S. ABUSE OF DIEGO GARCIA
The Foreign Office is coming under mounting pressure to tell the truth about whether there are plans by the United States to use the British island of Diego Garcia as a base from which to launch an attack on Iran.

Leading UK opposition politicians are demanding answers from British Ministers on the rôle played by the Indian Ocean atoll in previous attacks on Iraq and Afghanistan, and in any future strikes.

Last week, the Sunday Herald revealed that 387 bunker buster bombs were being shipped to Diego Garcia by the US military. Some experts suggested that the move could be in preparation for a possible strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Although the island is part of British territory, it is used by the United States as a military base. Some US air strikes against Iraq in 1991 and 2003, and against Afghanistan since 2001, originated from Diego Garcia [which] has also been used for ‘extraordinary rendition’ of suspected terrorists.

“The use of British sovereign territory without restriction is clearly something which causes great concern”, said Sir Menzies Campbell MP, a member of the House of Commons’ Foreign Affairs Committee and a former Liberal Democrat leader.

“The Government has been reluctant to give specific details about the nature of the agreement which governs US occupation. More transparency is unquestionably required”.

The LibDem foreign spokesman, Edward Davey MP, called on the Foreign Secretary, Mr David Miliband, to make clear whether Diego Garcia was being used by the United States to prepare for military action against Iran. “The events relating to this island of shame have damaged Britain’s international reputation”, he said.

The Foreign Office did not respond to a request for comment yesterday.

Last weekend’s Sunday Herald story about the shipment of US bunker busters to Diego Garcia was followed up by scores of media outlets across the world, in the United States, Russia, Europe, Asia, Africa and the Middle East.

One report, from the World Tribune in the United States, said that the shipment had originally been destined for US bases in Israel.

Quoting Congressional sources, it suggested that the bunker busters had been diverted to Diego Garcia as part of an unacknowledged embargo on military equipment for Israel. ENDS.

NEW: OBAMA BLOCKED DELIVERY OF BUNKER-BUSTERS TO ISRAEL
On 18th March 2010, World Tribune published the following article sourced from Washington, which contains much more information about the bunker-busting bombs that are now causing appropriate unease in Britain, as Diego Garcia is British territory.

• Editor’s elaboration:
There is little doubt that Israel is in fact engaged in de facto nuclear blackmail against the United States – as well, we now learn, as against Europe. Only recently, Israel put Western Europe on notice that it would be attacked if its actions threatened Israel – attacked with nuclear weapons from Israel without warning. The warning was issued by an Israeli operative, Martin vanCreveld, who appears to be licensed to say things publicly that the Government wants ‘out there’, but won’t elaborate itself. The source of the insight that Israel is engaged in nuclear blackmail against the United States is the US Jewish military academic cited immediately below.

According to Dr Alan Sabrosky, a US military academic, Jew and former Marine, Israel is a ‘mad dog’, and in a recent tirade he pointed out that ‘mad dogs’ are eventually put down. All of which suggests that a hardline approach to Israel, even supported by Mrs Hillary Clinton who is herself originally of Russian Jewish background, is operating below the radar.

This is slightly beyond the scope of what follows, but White House policy towards Israel elucidated in this report, fits the pattern. We append the text of the World Tribune article dated the 18th March 2010, sourced from Washington, here:

The United States has diverted a shipment of bunker-busters designated for Israel.

Officials said the U.S. military was ordered to divert a shipment of smart bunker-buster bombs from Israel to a military base in Diego Garcia. They said the shipment of 387 smart munitions had been slated to join pre-positioned U.S. military equipment in Israel Air Force bases.

“This was a political decision”, an official said.

In 2008, the United States approved an Israeli request for bunker-busters capable of destroying underground facilities, including Iranian nuclear weapons sites.

Officials said delivery of the weapons was held up by the administration of President Barack Obama, Middle East Newsline reported.

Since taking office, Mr Obama has refused to approve any major Israeli requests for U.S. weapons platforms or advanced systems. Officials said this included proposed Israeli procurement of AH-64D Apache attack helicopters, refueling systems, advanced munitions and data on a stealth variant of the F-15E.

“All the signs indicate that this will continue in 2010”, a Congressional source familiar with the Israeli military requests said. “This is really an embargo, but nobody talks about it publicly”.

Under the plan, the US military was to have stored 195 BLU-110 and 192 BLU-117 munitions in unspecified air force bases in Israel. The U.S. military uses four Israeli bases for the storage of about $400 million worth of pre-positioned equipment meant for use by either Washington or Jerusalem in any regional war.

In January 2010, the administration agreed to an Israeli request to double the amount of U.S. military stockpiles to $800 million. Officials said the bunker-busters as well as Patriot missile interceptors were included in the agreement.

The decision to divert the BLU munitions was taken amid the crisis between Israel and the United States over planned construction of Jewish homes in Jerusalem. The administration, including Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, has warned that Washington could reduce military aid to Israel because of its construction policy.

In 2007, after its war in Lebanon, Israel requested 2,000 BLU-109 live bombs from the United States. The 2,000-pound bomb, produced by Boeing and coupled with a laser guidance kit, was designed to penetrate concrete bunkers and other underground hardened sites.

Israeli ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren, was quoted as saying that his country faced its biggest crisis with the United States since 1975. A pro-Israel lobbyist said Oren was referring to the current US embargo, which echoed a decision taken 35 years ago by then-President Gerald Ford after Israel’s refusal to withdraw from Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula.

Oren has since denied the remark. ENDS.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time AMENDING AND INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE. In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

THE ABORTED PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD OF 8 MARCH 2010

cropped-chrisstory

BOTCHED OPERATION BY THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE TO RE-STEAL THE SOVEREIGN

Friday 19 March 2010 08:00

• SALVATORE R DEFRANCESCO ‘SOUGHT BY DOJ, TREASURY’

• PENNSYLVANIA STATE CORPORATION BUREAU FAILS TO UPDATE
CORPORATE SCREEN AS SPECIFICALLY INSTRUCTED BY THE COMPANY’S BOARD

PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD UPDATE: NEW YORK: 19TH MARCH 2010: 3:00PM EDT

There have been two developments (that we are at liberty at this time to report) in connection with this colossal scandal orchestrated as described in our original report of 15th March 2010 below:

(A): PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE HAS RECEIVED THE CORPORATE RESOLUTION OF PENNSLYVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC. [SEE BELOW] BUT HAS NOT AMENDED THEIR SCREEN AS INSTRUCTED BY THE DIRECTORS, WHICH SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE BY NOW:

• The Corporate Resolution of the Board of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. identified in the Foreword immediately below, requires Michael C. Cottrell B.A., M.S., to be described publicly as:

PRESIDENT
CEO
SECRETARY and:
TREASURER

• The United States Postal Service Track & Confirm service reports that:

(1): The package containing the Corporate Resolution and the necessary Filing Fee addressed to Pennsylvania Department of State Corporation Bureau, P.O. Box 8722, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8722, was accepted at 10:44 am on 16th March 2010 at ERIE, PA Station No. 12 [USPS 16505] against total Postage and Fees of $10.70. We hold a copy of the relevant US Postal Service Certified Mail Receipt [and of all relevant such receipts].

(2): The package was processed through the Sort Facility on 17th March 2010 at 4:19pm in Harrisburg, PA 17107.

(3): The package containing the Corporate Resolution and Filing Fee was delivered to Pennsylvania Department of State Corporation Bureau, P.O. Box 8722, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8722 on 18th March 2010 at 1:11am. by the US Postal Service.

• FACT: As of the time of this Update the Pennsylvania Department of State Corporation Bureau had not updated the screen for Pennsylvania Investments Inc. to show Michael C. Cottrell B.A., M.S., registered as:

PRESIDENT
CEO
SECRETARY and:
TREASURER

… of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., as required by the Corporate Resolution.

(B) THE COPY OF THE CORPORATE RESOLUTION AND OTHER DOCUMENTS SENT AT THE SAME TIME FROM ERIE TO MR A. CLIFTON HODGES, ATTORNEY FOR THE CMKM/CMKX VICTIMS, HAD NOT BEEN DELIVERED AS AT THIS POSTING. Specifically:

(1): The relevant package was accepted at ERIE Postal Station
No. 12 (USPS 16505) at 10:42 am on 16th March 2010.

(2): The package arrived at the Post Office, Pasadena, CA, at 8:35 am on 19th March 2010.

(3): We await confirmation that it has been delivered to Mr Hodges. UPDATE: At 4:45pm on 19th March, the Editor was advised that Mr Hodges’ package had arrived. The Editor was out of the office from 3:30pm until 10:00pm on Friday, so this Update was not appended until midnight.

( C): A THIRD PACKAGE CONTAINING THE SAME MATERIALS [FOR A PARTY
WE CANNOT REVEAL AT THIS TIME] HAS BEEN ‘MISSENT’, WHATEVER THAT MEANS.

Specifically:

(1): The relevant package was accepted at ERIE Postal Station No. 12
(USPS 16505) at 10:43 am on 16th March 2010.

(2): The package containing the Corporate Resolution arrived at the designated US Post Office at 8:54am on 19th March 2010.

(3): The next entry states: MISSENT, March 19, 2010, 8:55 am.

We await urgent confirmation that the package addressed to this
important third party has NOT been intercepted, and has been delivered.

(B): SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO REPORTEDLY BEING SOUGHT
BY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND TREASURY AGENTS:

• FACTS:

(1): On arrival in New York late in the evening of 16th March 2010, the Editor received an email
from a knowledgeable source indicating that Salvatore R. DeFrancesco ‘had been’ arrested in the preceding 24/48 hours.

(2): At 14:56pm on 17th March 2010, the Editor received an email from, another informed source who stated that in response to the Editor’s inquiry on this score, ‘so far, I can neither confirm nor deny the recent arrest of Salvatore R. DeFrancesco’, but that he was making further enquiries.

(3): At 10:55am on Thursday 18th March 2010, the Editor received the following email from Mr A. Clifton Hodges, lawyer for the CMKM/CMKX victims of the colossal SEC Phantom Shares scam:

‘I received [the following] information this morning: [quote]: “He is actively being sought by the DOJ and by Treasury agents; he is expected to be in custody by the end of the day”.

Mr Hodges elaborated: ‘I have been promised further information when he is in fact in custody; I will of course pass it on upon receipt’.

(4): At about 1.00pm on Friday 19th March, the Editor made further enquiries as to the status of the REPORTED search for the Mafioso impostor whose name had been illegally inserted as Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. with the full prior knowledge and manifest cooperation of the Pennsylvania Department of State Corporations Bureau and the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue [see original report below], as a result of which we learned as follows:

• The information that Salvatore R. DeFrancesco is being sought by the DOJ and by Treasury agents is reconfirmed [by a ‘special’ source].

• As of the time of this posting SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO HAD NOT BEEN ARRESTED AND WAS THEREFORE NOT IN CUSTODY.

THEREFORE THE WHOLE MATTER REMAINS UP IN THE AIR ‘AS WE SPEAK’.

OUR WORKING ASSUMPTION IS OF MORE SKULDUGGERY
Given all of the above, our interim conclusion is that we are dealing with MORE DECEPTION and that various layers of hastily contrived cover-up operations have been activated to facilitate or cover up the intended giga-theft.

So far as we are concerned, indications that this Mafioso is being sought by the DOJ and Treasury agents must be accompanied by the necessary caution that NOTHING THAT U.S. FEDERAL OR STATE AUTHORITIES ASSERT AS FACT CAN BE TRUSTED.

LIES ARE STANDARD OPERATIONAL U.S. FEDERAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT PRACTICE.

We await further developments.

• NEW SCURRILOUS ATTACK ON THE EDITOR OF THIS SERVICE: FOOT OF THIS REPORT

• FORENSIC DECONSTRUCTION OF A BOLD, BRAZEN WHITE HOUSE CRIME CAUGHT IN TIME

• SECURITIZATION IS ILLEGAL UPDATE: In the Subs/Books Update panel immediately below the NEWS panel that you are currently viewing, you will see an announcement concerning publication of Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 7 & 8. If you press that announcement text and open up the panel, you will see the contents list for the new [2010Q1] issue of E.I.R., including a breakdown of the Chapter Headings for the detailed analysis showing that Securitization is illegal. See our NEWS report dated 10th March 2010 for summaries of some of the data from this analysis. We understand that the report has created uproar in certain corridors of corrupt power.

FOREWORD:

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT RE: PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
Submitted with the $70 necessary filing fee to Pennsylvania Department of State, Corporation Bureau by Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., 1157 West 7th Street, Erie, PA 16502, on 15th March 2010. Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. was incorporated on 11th December 1984 under the following Pennsylvania Statute: 19 PA CODE CH. 35 (1933) P.L. 354, as amended. The Articles of Amendment stated that: ‘The amendment shall be effective on March 13th [2010] at 12:01 pm.’

The amendment was adopted by the Board of Directors pursuant to 15 Pa. C.S. Section 1914(c) or Section 5914(b). ‘The amendment adopted by the Corporation is set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof’. ‘In testimony whereof, the undersigned corporation has caused these Articles of Amendment to be signed by a duly authorized officer thereof this 13th day of March 2010: PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.

[Signed] Michael C. Cottrell: Title: PRESIDENT, CEO, SECRETARY AND TREASURER: 3/13/2010

Exhibit A forming an integral part of these Articles of Amendment:

PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814-453 4453
Email: pii-mcc@msn.com; pii3mcc@gmail.com

EXHIBIT “A”: 13 March 2010

CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION OF CORPORATE RESOLUTION

I hereby certify that at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Pennsylvania, held on the 13th day of MARCH, 2010 at which said meeting a quorum was present and acting throughout, the following resolutions were adopted and ever since have been and now are in full force and effect:

RESOLVED, that due to the attempted fraudulent devices indicated by the PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF STATE (www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp) of 8 MARCH 2010, et al., THIS CORPORATION HEREBY DECLARES any and all corporate resolutions pertaining to bank accounts excluding PNC ACCOUNT, ROBIN DRIVE, ERIE, PA, and all other Securities Accounts, excluding MORGAN STANLEY SECURITIES ACCOUNT (16 November 2005), as NULL AND VOID;

RESOLVED, that since this corporation has never granted a non-owner of shares of this corporation any directorship or office, it hereby grants Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., the retention of full authorities and powers as President, Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary, and is thereby granted full authorization and control of this corporation as per this duly authorized resolution;

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my signature
for said corporation this 13th day of March, 2010.

[Signed]:
Michael C. Cottrell, B.A, M.S.
President, CEO, Treasurer, & Secretary
Date: 3/13/2010

[Signed]:
Diane R. Cottrell, B.A., M.A.
(A.K.A. Diane R. Bertolini, B.A., M.A.)
Shareholder
Date: 3/13/2010

• Note: The Editor of this service holds copies
of these Articles of Amendment and of Exhibit “A” in our files.

• MAY WE INTRODUCE YOU TO SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO?

• ENTITIES THAT BALLOONED VIA ILLEGAL SECURITISATION

• DERIVATIVES EXPLOSION FOLLOWED PAULSON’S HIJACKING OF THE $4.5 TRILLION

• THE COLLECTIVE OF CRIMINAL AMERICAN PRESIDENTS

• MR COTTRELL CHECKS HIS CORPORATION’S STATE SCREEN

• OBJECTIVE: TO STEAL THE IMMINENT PAYOUTS
VIA THE ‘ITALIAN’ IMPOSTOR AS ‘SECRETARY’

• MONUMENTAL BLUNDER BY THE WHITE HOUSE CROOKS AND THEIR ASSOCIATES

• THE IMMEDIATE PREDECESSOR DECEPTION THAT WE ALSO ABORTED

• INDICATIONS OF RECKLESS, RUSHED IMPLEMENTATION

• ROUTINE EMBEDDING OF A STATE BUREAUCRACY
WHEN STRUCTURING SUCH A PLANNED GIGA-CRIME

• COMPARISON WITH THE STEALING OF TAX REVENUES IN WISCONSIN

• WHAT HAPPENED AFTER THE ‘ITALIAN SECRETARY’ WAS DISCOVERED

• CHINESE CONFIRM THAT ‘BUSH SENIOR’ IS STILL INTERFERING

• SUDDEN PHONE CALL FROM THE PA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

• COTTRELL DEMANDS FAXED COPIES OF PA’S TAX RECORDS

• MAFIOSO REMOVED FROM COTTRELL’S CORPORATE SCREEN

• FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE DOCUMENTS MAILED BY MS. CASTILLO

• STARTLING FINDINGS FROM OUR FORENSIC EXAMINATION
OF PA CORPORATE SCREEN DOCUMENTS

• INTENTION TO USE COTTRELL’S INVESTMENT CORPORATION
TO STEAL THE $6.2 TRILLION TRACEABLE BACK TO THE FALL OF 2007

• THEREFORE, AMERITRUST GROUPE, INC. WAS A TYPICAL C.I.A.
‘BLIND’ DECEPTION [SET UP VIA LEVITTE: FRANCE/DVD]

• INCOHERENT ‘EXPLANATION’ BY THE PA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

• PREPARATIONS FOR THEFT PUT IN PLACE SEVEN YEARS AGO:
ASSUMPTION THAT THE PAYMASTER WOULD COOPERATE

• WE HAVE NO DOUBT THAT GEORGE BUSH SENIOR, GORBACHEV, KOHL
AND ACKERMANN WERE EXPECTING TO SPLIT THE QUEEN’S $6.2 TRILLION
BETWEEN THEM, VIA DEUTSCHE A.G.. THAT WAS THE INTENTION.

• SUMMARY OF THE PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD

• DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

MAY WE INTRODUCE YOU TO SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO?
Have you met or heard of Salvatore R DeFrancesco?

Salvatore DeFrancesco Senior, that is.

No? Then may we please have the pleasure of introducing him to you.

It has been reported to us that Salvatore R DeFrancesco Sr. is an associate of, or has current or past relations with, George H. W. Bush, and is well known in certain, shall we say, ‘exotic’ banking and other financial circles, and among ‘the Italian community’ in the United States, doubtless including Chicago. He has influence with a number of important financial institutions.

He is aged about 60, and has a son, Salvatore Raymond DeFrancesco Jr, CPA, aged 40. Prior to January 2003, Salvatore R. DeFranceso Jr. was Chief Financial Officer of Landmark Community Bank in Pittston, Pennsylvania.

In November 2009, Salvatore R DeFrancesco Jr. was reported to be Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Fidelity D & D Bancorp., Inc., positions he has held since January 2003 – as well as serving as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Fidelity Deposit & Discount Bank, both of Dunmore, Pennsylvania.

ENTITIES THAT BALLOONED VIA ILLEGAL SECURITISATION
Salvatore DeFranceso Senior is Vice President of Penn Acceptance Corporation, and is a partner/owner with Daniel and Joseph Limongelli of Penn Acceptance Corporation, Avoca, PA.

Joseph Limongelli is President and Secretary, and Daniel Limongelli is Treasurer of Penn Acceptance Corporation, with their mailing address at 639 Main Street, Avoca, PA 18641-0.

However the Officers of Penn Acceptance Corporation function, according to the Pennsylvania Department of State, from 2007 Highway Suite 315, Pittston TWP, PA 18640-40.

Both Fidelity D & D Bancorp., Inc/ Fidelity Deposit & Discount Bank. Inc., and Penn Acceptance Corporation ballooned in size from 2006 onwards through trading Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) – which, as exposed in our report dated 10th March 2010, are illegal under US and Common Law. All such contracts, being formulated to facilitate criminal actions, are void and fraudulent [see full report dated 10th March 2010 for details].

Yet in the year ended 31st December 2006, Fidelity D & D Bancorp Inc. was a small operation, the audit fee billed by auditors Parente Randolph, LLC having cost $86,203 [2005: $41,259].

Now, as you will recall from our early reports in this series, 2006 was the year when The People’s Bank of China transferred $4.5 trillion to the United States. The transfer was immediately hijacked by Henry M. Paulson Jr. as soon as he became President Bush’s third Treasury Secretary – a man sufficiently corrupt to meet Bush’s daily criminal requirements, which Mr Paulson’s two far-from-innocent predecessors had been, shall we say, less eager to satisfy.

So, instead of being applied for the purpose indicated by the Chinese central bank, the funds were diverted to underpin securitisation operations involving massive leveraging and hypothecation for corrupt and wholly illegal transactions purposes.

DERIVATIVES EXPLOSION FOLLOWED PAULSON’S HIJACKING OF THE $4.5 TRILLION
It was therefore ‘no accident’ that the derivatives explosion took off from 2006 onwards, leading straight to the brick wall encountered in September 2008; and among entities heavily involved in these CDO excesses were Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc./Fidelity Deposit & Discount Bank and Penn Acceptance Corporation, which expanded on a scale which could not possibly have occurred had they been involved exclusively in legitimate business.

On 11th December 1984, Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., founded and registered Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of State Corporations authorities. The firm is registered as Business Corporation Entity #844244 in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and its Principal Office Address is shown as 1157 West Seventh Street, Erie, PA 16502. The sole Officer of the Company has been Michael C. Cottrell, President and Secretary.

For the record, the Editor of this service holds paper copies of printouts confirming the foregoing outline information concerning Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., from the Pennsylvania Department of State Corporations authorities’ Microfilm Number 8475 [Start: 905; End: 907] dated: 6th April 2005; 1st October 2006; 27th March 2008; 15th May 2008; 22nd December 2008; and 9th May 2009.

THE COLLECTIVE OF CRIMINAL AMERICAN PRESIDENTS
You will recall that we have reported that the Collective of Five Criminal Presidents of the United States – Carter (39), Bush Sr. (41), Clinton (42), Bush Jr. (43) and Obama (44) – DEMANDED immunity from prosecution from the World Court around last September, and were granted such immunity in a scandalous departure by the World Court, given that in seeking immunity these Presidents were self-acknowledging their need for immunity from prosecution and therefore openly confirming that they themselves recognise that they are criminal operatives.

[A statement by an anonymous, and therefore non-credible, Internet source on 11th March, citing unprovenanced and unprovable so-called intelligence sources that this is not true, is false].

You may also have noted that we doubt whether the World Court’s outrageous grant of immunity – conveying the impression that the World Court considers that its responsibility may be to protect high-level criminals from prosecution – protects the Collective of Presidents in the United States itself: it is applicable to the financial crimes that have been committed in Britain and Europe.

These reminders are inserted here in order to re-emphasise that President Obama and the other four Presidents ‘work together’ as a criminal Collective: so the sudden appearance of President Obama in Pennsylvania on or before 8th March 2010, related to THIS enquiry, will most certainly have reflected an operation known to or masterminded by George H.W. Bush Senior and President Obama’s Italian and other Chicago Mafiosi associates, with the full knowledge and connivance of senior CIA operative Mrs Hillary Clinton and her CIA husband, former President Bill Rockefeller.

MR COTTRELL CHECKS HIS CORPORATION’S STATE SCREEN
Now, if you’d like to pour yourself a stiff glass of whisky, we’ll divulge the purpose of this report.

On 8th March 2010, the Editor’s birthday as it happened, Mr Michael C. Cottrell performed a routine check of the Business Entity Filing for Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

He discovered that ALL OF A SUDDEN, the following additional entry had appeared on the filing for Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. (of which of course the Editor holds multiple copies, pulled both in Pennsylvania and in the United Kingdom):

Officers:
Name: MICHAEL C. COTTRELL
Title: President
Address: 1157 W 7th Street, ERIE PA 16502-25

Name: SALVATORE R DEFRANCESCO
Title: Secretary
Address: [Address not available].

• SELF-EVIDENT FACT:
At no time since the commencement of the solar system did Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., at a Meeting of the Board of his corporation, appoint SALVATORE R DEFRANCESCO or anyone else to serve as Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. No such filing was ever submitted to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of State Corporations Registration authorities.

OBJECTIVE: TO STEAL THE IMMINENT PAYOUTS
VIA THE ‘ITALIAN’ IMPOSTOR AS ‘SECRETARY’
Michael Cottrell reacted, as did the Editor of this service, Mr A. Clifton Hodges, Attorney for the CMKM/CMKX victims of the colossal Securities and Exchange Commission PHANTOM SHARES fraud, and others informed of this intrusion, with justified fury and outrage.

MR COTTRELL PHONES THE PA DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Michael Cottrell began by telephoning a Ms. Butler, Supervisor, Pennsylvania Department of State between approximately 9:34 a.m. EST and 9:40 a.m. EST, informing her inter alia as follows:

• Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. is to receive funds amounting to $15 billion derived from a ‘Settlement’ between the United States of America, the World Court, the People’s Republic of China, with the signed approval of President Barack Obama; and:

• A loan worth $6.2 trillion from the British Monarchical Power for the purpose of funding a Private Refunding of the United States Dollar.

• Pennsylvania Investments Inc., and Michael C. Cottrell himself, will pay a sum in connection with Pennsylvania Corporate and Personal Taxes of $495 million arising from this ‘Settlement’ process.

• The Pennsylvania Department of State has become a participant, whether knowing or unknowing, in the perpetration of ongoing fraudulent attempts to DIVERT the foregoing funds and to subvert the payment of the foregoing PA State taxes, with the assistance of banking sector and political fraudsters located in London, Paris, Geneva, Houston, Dallas and Washington DC, and in various locations in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

• This fraudulent attempt to divert the funds due to Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. is evidenced by the placement of ‘SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO as SECRETARY’ AS AN OFFICER (SECRETARY) OF Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. #844244 per the Pennsylvania Department of State corporations authorities’ screen dated 8th and 9th March 2010, without the knowledge or approval of the owners and Board of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. and without the necessary Amendment of Articles.

• Michael Cottrell DEMANDED the IMMEDIATE removal of the name ‘Salvatore R. Defrancesco’ as Secretary from the screen identifying entry for Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. corporation #844244.

• Mr Cottrell also DEMANDED an investigation and a FULL REPORT TO THE BOARD of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. corporation #844244 divulging WHO gave the authority for this intrusive name to be placed on the screen, what evidence existed of any authorization granting this individual the position of SECRETARY of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. corporation #844244, and what action will be taken against the individual committing the fraudulent entry.

• Mr Cottrell then stated that if the offending intrusion was not removed IMMEDIATELY upon the receipt by facsimile of his letter and accompanying documentation [amounting in all to 39 pages], Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. corporation Number 844244 will move legally for fraud against the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pedro A. Cortes and others, against this Salvatore R DeFrancesco individually and severally, referencing a fraud against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. corporation #844244 for THREE TIMES DAMAGES, namely $45 billion:

… since the payment is IMMINENT and therefore the screen can be used to divert or steal the aforementioned funds to Fidelity Deposit & Discount Bank et al., and/or Penn Acceptance Corporation, et al.

• Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. corporation #844244 has no accounts with either. The funds are to be deposited with Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.’s identified securities account at Morgan Stanley & Co., New York, NY.

• Summary to date:
This represented a bold, brazen attempt to divert the $15.0 billion and the sovereign $6.2 trillion loan funds earmarked for the funding of the private sector Dollar Refunding Programme payable to Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., in accordance with international mandated authority, by using a fraudulent imposed ‘Italian community’ representative as SECRETARY, who would be in a position to issue instructions to the paymaster to DIVERT AND STEAL THE LOAN FUNDS for payment into accounts controlled by the unauthorised intruder posing as SECRETARY of Mr Cottrell’s firm.

MONUMENTAL BLUNDER BY THE WHITE HOUSE CROOKS AND THEIR ASSOCIATES
It also represented a MONUMENTAL BLUNDER by the criminal operatives concerned, starting with President Barack Hussein Obama – who, we have been AUTHORITATIVELY AND EMPHATICALLY INFORMED, presided over and condoned, or facilitated, this INTENDED BUT ABORTED THEFT, on behalf of the Collective of Criminal Presidents of which he is currently the de facto Chairman.

As you can well imagine, following the faxing of these documents to the named recipients, and the realisation in high places on both sides of the Atlantic that the Editor of this service had acquired copies of the documents in question, turmoil broke out in the relevant offices and corridors of corrupt power in Washington DC, London and elsewhere.

• THE CROOKS AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL HAD BEEN CAUGHT RED-HANDED TRYING, ONCE AGAIN, TO DIVERT/STEAL THE SOVEREIGN LOAN FUNDS INTENDED FOR DOLLAR REFUNDING.

THE IMMEDIATE PREDECESSOR DECEPTION THAT WE ALSO ABORTED
As you will recall, an earlier, more feeble operation had erupted, centred on a crude attempt to rewrite Mr Wanta’s legend, inter alia to purport to represent that he ‘worked for’ the Federal Reserve – which would have had tangible consequences facilitating’ diversion of the funds – contrary to the language of the Writ for a Petition of Mandamus and the Motion to Dismiss filed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, both of which were the subject of a hearing at the United States Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria, attended by Michael C. Cottrell, Dana V. Wilcox, the Editor of this service, and Mr Wanta.

Any variation of Wanta’s legend would have undermined the language of the Petition, leaving him vulnerable to a charge of perjury: hence, when we republished the text of the Petition which it had been anticipated that everyone would have forgotten all about, that operation had to be aborted. Moreover parties involved in promulgating the lies in question had to cease and desist, as well.

So the criminal minds set immediately about reviving a dormant mechanism for stealing the funds (as they have been doing ever since our lives were turned upside down as a consequence of their serial criminality): and they came up with the Pennsylvania Fraud, built on preparations for the theft initiated seven years earlier – the most brazen attempt to steal the funds yet recorded.

INDICATIONS OF RECKLESS, RUSHED IMPLEMENTATION
The Pennsylvania Fraud has all the hallmarks of of crass. amateurish, brash risk-taking, and having been implemented (though not contrived: see below) in an extreme hurry.

The risks they took included the following elements:

• That Mr Cottrell would not check the Pennsylvania authorities’ corporate screen until after the thefts had been perpetrated, when it would, they will have assumed, have been ‘too late’.

• That the designated Paymaster would willingly participate in the diversion/theft.

• That ‘Salvatore R. DeFrancesco’ would be exposed and his connections with the Collective of Criminal Presidents and dubious financial institutions and linkages would be revealed.

• That, untypically, this Editor would not become aware of this monumental attempt to re-steal The Queen’s loan funds and the funds payable to Michael Cottrell’s corporation (related to the earlier stealing by George H. W. Bush of the Deutsche Bank AG contract and the electronic ‘stealing’ of his signature, for the private enrichment of George H. W. Bush, Mikhail Gorbachev, Helmut Kohl and Dr Joseph Ackermann as partners in Deutsche AG, St. Gallen, Switzerland) – until it was far too late.

ROUTINE EMBEDDING OF A STATE BUREAUCRACY
WHEN STRUCTURING SUCH A PLANNED GIGA-CRIME
And why did they imagine it was ‘safe’ to take such risks, implicating President Obama directly?

The answer to this question is interesting. It conforms to a standard pattern. This revolves around a STATE (never a FEDERAL: always a STATE) bureaucracy. The fraud is committed with the de facto assistance of the selected bureaucracy in question.

The function of the STATE bureaucratic element built into the operation is to provide the ‘fall-back’ pretext for the attempted theft – which is always the same, namely that the modern equivalent of ‘a clerical error’ had occurred. This ‘explanation’ surfaces when the operation has had to be aborted, as in this instance [see below]. It serves as a means of BLOCKING FURTHER ENQUIRIES, so that the sting is supposedly taken out of the outrage and everything subsides back to ‘normalcy’.

The only problem this time round is that the operation was identified, exposed, ‘stamped on’ and aborted in ‘real time’ – with the full details being made available to the Editor of this service, so that we can publicise the rotten stench of the head of the fish sitting in the White House.

In this instance, a mole inside the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s official structures would have procured the clandestine insertion of a Mafioso’s name as Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. corporation #844244.

COMPARISON WITH THE STEALING OF TAX REVENUES IN WISCONSIN
We have observed and deconstructed similar corruption within the State structures in Wisconsin: see, for instance, our report dated 6th August 2007, giving comprehensive forensic details of the triplication of the same State tax, the massive cover-up that ensued, and the failure of authorities to address this corruption. Another dimension of ongoing fraudulent practice within the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue can be summarised as follows (we have documents proving this):

• As a WI State resident you receive a State tax demand, requesting tax to be paid to the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue at a box number address.

• You send the funds demanded by the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue to the post office box address printed on the tax demand.

• After a period of time you receive an agitated DEMAND from the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue for the SAME TAX, with a request that it must be paid immediately to the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue’s designated street address.

• You protest that you have already paid the tax and that you have no intention of paying it twice.

• Wisconsin State Department of Revenue then triggers its dunning procedure, charging interest on the tax you have already paid, threatening court action culminating in the sequestration of your assets to the value of the unpaid tax, and a possible jail sentence.

• You send proof of payment (the money sent to the P.O. Box) by registered recorded delivery.

• The Wisconsin State Department of Revenue reiterates that so far as it is concerned, it never received the funds. You protest that they passed through your bank statement and provide them with a copy of the bank statement in question. They continue to deny they ever received the money.

• You inform lawyers, officers under the United States under the Misprision of Felony Statute, etc. of the travesty and injustice, but nothing happens: because all involved are working this together, being masons and members of secret societies catering for their own sordid interests – but mainly because the Jewish mafia controls the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue. Undsoweiter.

In the case of the Pennsylvania Fraud, we have prima facie evidence of criminal behaviour inside the State structures. Why should Pennsylvania be any different from the State of Wisconsin?

• Here’s what happened next.

WHAT HAPPENED AFTER THE ‘ITALIAN SECRETARY’ WAS DISCOVERED
As indicated, Mr Cottrell faxed his letter and associated documents to the named recipients on 9th March 2010. The main documents faxed to the Pennsylvania Department of State and to the named recipients are reproduced verbatim below, following this narrative.

Nothing happened on 9th March; and by the morning of 10th March, Salvatore R. DeFrancesco remained on the State authorities’ official screen, falsely logged as SECRETARY of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. So on 10th March, between 8:41 a.m. and 8:46 a.m., Michael Cottrell telephoned the Pennsylvania Department of State to ask why the necessary action to remove the imposter’s name had not been taken, as demanded in his letter to Ms. Butler, Supervisor, in that department.

Mr Cottrell was informed that Ms. Butler was ‘not in the office’. He was then placed ‘on hold’. When the woman returned to the phone, he was told that ‘we will not be taking any action at this time’. Mr Cottrell also contacted Martha Brown, General Counsel for the Pennsylvania Department of State.

CHINESE CONFIRM THAT ‘BUSH SENIOR’ IS STILL INTERFERING
On 10th March, we received authoritative intelligence from a Chinese official, sourced curiously from Hawaii, who had stated that ‘there are still problems with George Bush Sr’. This was a clear reference to the fact that the Chinese authorities knew that Bush Sr. stood behind the attempt to steal/divert the funds from Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. on 9th March – which was the (latest) date when the payouts should have taken place.

SUDDEN PHONE CALL FROM THE PA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
At 11.11 am Ms. Julie A. Castillo (717-705 6087), from the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue, not the Department of State, suddenly telephoned Mr Cottrell. She had ‘done some research’ and had discovered that Mr Cottrell had transposed ‘the last four digits of his [Mr Cottrell’s] own Social Security Number on a 2004 tax return, and that these last four digits corresponded to the last four digits of the Social Security Number belonging to Mr Salvatore R. DeFrancesco’. Quote unquote.

Provided you have not consumed too much whisky already, you will immediately understand that this ‘explanation’, apart from being nonsensical, was spurious and fabricated. Even if digits of a Social Security Number had been mixed up six years ago, that did not give anyone authority to assume the rôle of Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. at any time, let alone, out of the blue, six years later, when the payments were imminent. Nice try, but manifestly irrelevant.

Further, even if this were true, it would not explain why all subsequent Cottrell tax documents after 2004 (2005) had not reflected this error.

And further still, if there was any connection whatsoever between this lame ‘explanation’ and the sudden appearance of this member of ‘the Italian community’ on the Pennsylvania Department of State’s screen for Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., why had Salvatore R. DeFrancesco not appeared on the screen from 2004 onwards?

COTTRELL DEMANDS FAXED COPIES OF PA’S TAX RECORDS
Mr Cottrell requested that Ms. Julie Castillo fax the Pennsylvania Tax authorities’ relevant Cottrell tax documentation from 2003-2004 to date, to him on his office facsimile Erie, PA. [814-453 4453], to enable him to verify the accuracy of the ‘explanation’ that she had just put forward.

Ms. Castillo said she would comply. She also said that she would need to give an instruction to the Pennsylvania Department of State, for the (intrusive, false) ‘SECRETARY’ to be removed from the screen. This telephone call terminated at 11:17 a.m..

At 11:26 a.m. on 10th March, Ms. Castillo rang Mr Cottrell back to say that she had ‘spoken to my supervisor’ who had stated that Ms. Castillo was not permitted to fax the documents in question, but that she would instead put them in the mail.

At 12:06p p.m. EST on 10th March the name of the ‘Italian’ imposter, a known associate of George Bush Sr., was still on the PA Department of State’s screen for Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

MAFIOSO REMOVED FROM COTTRELL’S CORPORATE SCREEN
By 2:02pm on Wednesday 10th March, the screen had been amended to delete the name of the deliberately inserted Bush-Obama ‘Italian community’ impostor, so that it now read as follows:

Business Entity Filing History
Date: 3/10/2010
Name: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.
Entity Number: 844244
Status: Active
Entity Creation Date: 12/11/1984
State of Business: PA
Registered Office Address: 1167 West Seventh Street, Erie, PA 16502-0, Erie
Officers:
Name: Michael C. Cottrell
Title: President
Address: 1157 W 7th Street Erie, PA, 16502-25

FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE DOCUMENTS MAILED BY MS. CASTILLO
In the early evening UK time on Saturday 13th March 2010, the Editor was informed that Ms. Julie A. Castillo had sent certain Cottrell corporate tax documents to Michael Cottrell, copies of which were faxed shortly afterwards to the Editor of this service. Specifically, we received PA Corporate Tax Reports for the years 2004, 2006 and 2007. Here’s what we found on examining these documents:

• PA Corporate Tax Report 2004: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.
(1): The last four digits of Mr Cottrell’s Social Security Number are shown as: 8024,
which is NOT CORRECT. The first two digits of the last four digits should read: 08
(2) Michael Cottrell is listed as: President of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. CORRECT
(3) Michael Cottrell is listed as: Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. CORRECT
The document is signed by Michael C. Cottrell and his signature is correct.

• PA Corporate Tax Report 2006: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.
(1): The last four digits of Mr Cottrell’ Social Security Number are shown as: 0824, which is CORRECT. That is to say, TWO digits, not FOUR digits, were transposed in the 2004 Tax Report. [Mr Cottrell advises separately that the incorrect transposition of the first two of the last four digits to 8024 also appeared on the corporate tax reports for 2003 and 2005].
(2) Michael Cottrell is listed as: President/Managing Partner of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.
(3) Michael Cottrell is NOT listed as: Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., contrary to the CORRECT information sustained on the PA Corporate Tax reports for 2003, 2004 and 2005. As shown separately [because of a certain complexity] below, for a number of years, Pennsylvania authorities REMOVED ALL MENTION OF MR COTTRELL AND HIS CORPORATE TITLES from the screen, as part of the intended fraud. The document is signed by Michael C. Cottrell and his signature is correct.

• PA Corporate Tax Report 2007: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.
(1): The last four digits of Mr Cottrell’ Social Security Number are shown as: 0824, which is CORRECT. That is to say, TWO digits, not FOUR digits, were transposed in the 2004 Tax Report. [Mr Cottrell advises separately that the incorrect transposition of the first two of the last four digits to 8024 also appeared on the corporate tax reports for 2003 and 2005].
(2) Michael Cottrell is listed as: President/Managing Partner of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.
(3) Michael Cottrell is NOT listed as: Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., contrary to the CORRECT information sustained on the PA Corporate Tax reports for 2003, 2004 and 2005. As shown separately [because of a certain complexity] below, for a number of years, Pennsylvania authorities REMOVED ALL MENTION OF MR COTTRELL AND HIS CORPORATE TITLES from the screen, as part of the intended fraud. The document is signed by Michael C. Cottrell and his signature is correct.

STARTLING FINDINGS FROM OUR FORENSIC EXAMINATION
OF PA CORPORATE SCREEN DOCUMENTS
In the segment below divulging details of the letter and documents faxed and mailed by Mr Cottrell on 9th March 2010 to the Governor of Pennsylvania and the other named recipients, you will see under EXHIBIT “D” [Items D-01 to D-13], a list of screen documents displayed by the Pennsylvania Department of State to show the status of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

In addition to the findings exposed elsewhere in this report [e.g., above], we append immediately below each listing, a statement of what selected screen documents from the ‘EXHIBIT “D”’ list do OR DO NOT show – from which REITERATED INCONSISTENCIES we conclude that the Pennsylvania Department of State fiddled illegally with the screen displays for Mr Cottrell’s firm for many years, playing around with and varying what was displayed – despite the fact that no variations (Articles of Amendment) referencing changes in officers of the corporation had been filed. [Non-US readers: the US date format has to be displayed here to conform with standard US usage]:

D-01: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/9/2010 [falsely] identifying SALVATORE R DEFRANCESCO as SECRETARY of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. This imposter from the ‘Italian community’ appeared suddenly from ‘nowhere’.

• This represents AN ILLEGAL ACT by the Pennsylvania Department of State perpetrated against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. The ‘explanation’ proferred by the PA Department of Revenue is spurious, insolent, diversionary, reckless, irrelevant and an insult to our intelligence.

D-02: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/9/2010 indicating that NO AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES WAS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPT. OF STATE AUTHORIZING CHANGE OF OFFICERS since 12/11/1984.

D-03: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 5/9/2009, showing MICHAEL C. COTTRELL as PRESIDENT of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

D-04: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/9/2009, showing that as of the search time 09:44 on that date no variations (Articles of Amendment) referencing changes in officers of the corporation had been filed.

D-05: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 12/22/2008, showing MICHAEL C. COTTRELL as PRESIDENT of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. Since [see below] Mr Cottrell had been ARBITRARILY REMOVED AS PRESIDENT from the screen in earlier years [see below], the sudden ‘rehabilitation’ of Michael C. Cottrell as President of his own corporation by the Pennsylvania Department of State in December 2008 must surely have reflected some development which had compelled the corrupt PA officials concerned to REVERSE their previous illegal elimination [see below] of Mr Cottrell as President of his own corporation.

That event was the submission of an Affidavit by Michael Cottrell to Her Majesty the Queen via the Editor of this service in September 2008. Moreover it was then known, from telephone intercepts, that Michael Cottrell would be forwarding a further document [the Notarised Affirmation, shown as EXHIBIT “B”, included within the 39-page document faxed and mailed on 9th March 2010 to the Governor of Pennsylvania et al. and therefore appended (as ‘EXHIBIT “B”) below].

• This document was duly placed in the hands of the Editor of this service for forwarding to Buckingham Palace, as indicated.

D-06: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 12/18/2008 Uniform Commercial Code (UCC): This states that: Search Results Include Filings Through 12/18/2008 12:00 a.m., to which is appended the rubric: ‘There are currently no financing statements or other liens for the above requested criteria’.

D-07: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 12/22/2008, showing that as on that date no variations (Articles of Amendment) referencing changes in officers of the corporation had been filed.

D-08: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 5/15/2008. The necessary designation of Michael C. Cottrell as President and Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., applicable since the corporation’s formation on 11th December 1984, has been REMOVED. This represents AN ILLEGAL ACT by the Pennsylvania Department of State perpetrated against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

D-09: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 5/15/2008, showing that as on that date no variations (Articles of Amendment) referencing changes in officers of the corporation had been filed.

D-10: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/27/2008. The necessary designation of Michael C. Cottrell as President and Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., applicable since the corporation’s formation on 11th December 1984, has been REMOVED. This represents AN ILLEGAL ACT by the Pennsylvania Department of State perpetrated against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

D-11: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/27/2008, showing that as on that date no variations (Articles of Amendment) referencing changes in officers of the corporation had been filed.

D-12: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 10/1/2006. The necessary designation of Michael C. Cottrell as President and Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., applicable since the corporation’s formation on 11th December 1984, has been REMOVED. This represents AN ILLEGAL ACT by the Pennsylvania Department of State perpetrated against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc..

D-13: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 4/6/2005. The necessary designation of Michael C. Cottrell as President and Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., applicable since the corporation’s formation on 11th December 1984, has been REMOVED. This represents AN ILLEGAL ACT by the Pennsylvania Department of State perpetrated against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

• CONCLUSION FROM THE FOREGOING: The forensic evidence presented above (copies of which documents are held on file by the Editor of this service) shows that the original plan was simply to ‘delete’ Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., altogether, and to use his corporate vehicle, Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., as the shell for the purpose of stealing the $6.2 trillion sovereign funds (with its securities account with Morgan Stanley & Co., New York, NY).

The reason for this must clearly have been that it had been confirmed already by the international authorities concerned that Mr Cottrell was to be granted the privilege, given his trustworthiness and unique securities expertise, of organising and implementing the private sector fully taxable, transparent Refunding of the US Dollar.

INTENTION TO USE COTTRELL’S INVESTMENT CORPORATION
TO STEAL THE $6.2 TRILLION TRACEABLE BACK TO THE FALL OF 2007
At least that’s what appears at first sight. But on yet further investigation, it is recalled that while Michael Cottrell and Leo Wanta were staying in the Staten Island hotel (part of the ‘40 days in the hotel wilderness’) in November 2007, prior to Wanta’s ‘switch’ precipitated by what follows here, Wanta was incessantly arguing with Mr Cottrell about the necessity of equipping Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. with a BANK account with Citibank.

Mr Cottrell argued that he would never agree to using anything other than a SECURITIES ACCOUNT (i.e. the account of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., with Morgan Stanley in New York).

[Mr Wanta was only able to travel outside Wisconsin at all because the Editor’s since stolen loan of $35,000 to him, had procured the shortening of Wanta’s probation by five years and two weeks – to 14th November 2005, rather than 28th November 2010].

In other words, while purporting to be rooting for payment into his AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., what Wanta was actually seeking to procure while in the prolonged presence of Mr Cottrell in October-November 2007 [see our contemporary reports] was that Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. would acquire a BANK ACCOUNT from which The Queen’s sovereign $6.2 trillion loan, made available via the Bank of England to Bank of New York Mellon on 19th-20th June 2007, could be stolen as it was being paid to Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., in accordance with the international instructions.

• BECAUSE THEY COULD NOT HOPE TO STEAL THE $6.2 TRILLION
FROM PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS INC.’S SECURITIES ACCOUNT.

• As repeatedly stated in these reports, a US Securities Account is infinitely more secure than a bank account. It would be VERY DIFFICULT to steal/divert money from a US securities account.

Recall that Wanta works for Bush Sr. and was the courier between Bush Senior and Gorbachëv. Wanta’s job all along has been TO FACILITATE THEFTS BY BUSH SENIOR.

• THEREFORE, AMERITRUST GROUPE, INC. WAS A TYPICAL C.I.A.
‘BLIND’ DECEPTION [SET UP VIA LEVITTE: FRANCE/DVD]
All the time that Cottrell and Story were involved with Wanta, the cover story was that funds sent over by the People’s Bank of China in May 2006 were to be paid into AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., for the benefit of Wanta, who, as well as ‘working for’ Bush Senior, was also, all along, being used and deceived by him, and by Cheney and Bush Junior and their associates.

Wanta would leave the Staten Island hotel accommodation and go down to the public telephone booths in the hotel lobby to make calls to Mr Cheney and other operatives, to obtain his updated instructions, and to give progress reports on whether he was succeeding in getting Mr Cottrell to go along with the idea that Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., should acquire a bank account. It now transpires that this was all an elaborate cover masking the following circumstances:

• Ex-Treasury Secretary John Snow, considered by Bush Jr. to be ‘insufficiently malleable’, had to be ‘caused to resign’, in order to be replaced by Bush’s selected operative, Henry M. Paulson. The $4.5 trillion was then duly hijacked as intended (by the Bush Crime Family), by this Bush lackey, as Treasury Secretary, for use as footings for ILLEGAL securitisation operations (leveraged trading and hypothecation), thus specifically precipitating the vast EXPLOSION of derivatives in 2006-08, leading to the sudden bursting of the resulting global derivatives bubble and to the COLLAPSE following the intervention by the Editor of this service to the highest UK level – whereupon the sovereign monies were placed into ‘lockdown’ (out of access) almost immediately (on 10th-12th September 2008), unravelling exposed Bush-related Ponzi ops. (Madoff, Stanford et al).

• A year earlier, given that the $4.5 trillion had been ‘accounted for’, Wanta’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus [June 2007] asking for the $4.5 trillion to be paid to AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. turns out to have been an elaborate ruse, as was made obvious when Wanta appeared before the United States Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria, on 19th October 2007, and deliberately made a complete jackass of himself from the podium. Judge Ellis accordingly pronounced in favour of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond’s Motion to Dismiss. The Editor was present in the Court and witnessed this fabricated theatrical scene at first hand.

• While ostensibly nevertheless subsequently waiting in the Staten Island hotel for the AmeriTrust Groupe Inc. payment to be made by Citibank in November 2007, Mr Wanta had in fact been tasked by Bush/Cheney to keep waffling about AmeriTrust Groupe while all the while pressurising Michael Cottrell to attach a bank account to his Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. corporation (which was to conduct financial transactions with AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.). If that operation had succeeded, the intention would have been to use Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. as the shell with a bank account and an illegally imposed Secretary or Board of Directors, for the purpose of effecting the diversion of the payment of the $6.2 trillion US Dollar Refunding loan funds stipulated by the international authorities for Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., without Mr Cottrell’s knowledge or consent.

• By correctly refusing to agree to Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. acquiring a BANK account, Mr Cottrell FRUSTRATED THIS CRIMINAL INTENT, precipitating:

(1): Wanta’s ‘switch’ operation, starting with his intimation to Mr Cottrell that ‘we must get rid of Christopher Story but don’t tell him’, and culminating in Mr Wanta’s cack-handed, irregular and vituperative (without a cause) ‘dismissal’ of Michael Cottrell in March 2008 from the positions of Treasury and Executive Vice President of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. (received by Michael Cottrell with undisguised relief); and:

(2): The continued blocking of the Settlements because the White House et al. criminals had no intention of effecting the Settlements payments unless they could steal the bulk of them (especially the $6.2 trillion sovereign loan from the Queen for the Refunding of the US Dollar) for themselves.

FRUSTRATION BY MR COTTRELL AND THIS SERVICE of the further attempt to seize the $6.2 trillion sovereign loan fund on 8th-10th March 2010 has meant that the White House et al. have been UNABLE TO STEAL THE QUEEN’S LOAN FUNDS YET AGAIN; so they are currently trying to work out what deception they can mount next, to achieve that same constantly frustrated objective.

In other words, the Bush Crime Syndicate + CIA/DVD + the Collective of Criminal Presidents + the corrupt US Treasury under Geithner + the corrupt US State Department under Mrs Clinton have just demonstrated once again that they remain hell-bent on STEALING THE $6.2 TRILLION, i.e. mobilising these sovereign loan funds for their own purposes.

• THEY HAVE BEEN BLOCKED AT EVERY TURN.

What remains to be seen is: WILL THEY BE BRAZEN ENOUGH, AFTER BEING CAUGHT
SO RED-HANDED, TO WORK OUT YET ANOTHER WAY OF ACHIEVING THEIR OBJECTIVE?

Given that they have botched the latest attempt to steal the funds so badly, and have left such a rich trail of clues confirming their criminal intentions, the logical answer to this question, would be: NO. They have blown it. But the German element among these criminals never knows when to stop, and when it has been defeated. Their arrogance knows no limitations, as you are aware.

So a sensible precaution would be to assume that these crooks, and their associates, will continue to duck and weave and fiddle around, hoping against hope that they can pull off the stealing of the $6.2 trillion without getting caught in the act – and in spite of the fact that WE HAVE REPEATEDLY CAUGHT AND EXPOSED THEM ‘IN FLAGRANTE’.

• WHEREUPON U.S. LAW ENFORCEMENT, PAYMASTERS ETC, DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO BRING THESE HIGHEST-LEVEL CRIMINALS TO JUSTICE. The fact that they hold or held high office does not place them above the law. Their continued perpetration of MASSIVE CRIMES insults the American people and all those around the world who are watching the US authorities’ lily-livered cowardice and brazen flouting of the Rule of Law in allowing these hideous criminals to continue operations, despite having been repeatedly caught either in the act or planning it.

Judging by the number of people who would have had to have known about the intended Pennsylvania Fraud, the word BRIBERY, or an illusory promise of same, springs to mind.

We understand that following the latest aborted theft attempt, the level of activity from the UK side has intensified: but of course those concerned never consult us at all.

• They just leave us ‘out there’ to stick our necks out for them, and to expose what’s going on.

INCOHERENT ‘EXPLANATION’ BY THE PA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Reverting now to the attempted giga-theft of 8-9 March 2010, as you will have gathered from the above, what Ms. Julie A. Castillo of the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue represented to Mr Cottrell by telephone between 11:11 a.m. and 11:17 a.m. on 10th March 2010 was as follows:

• She had been ‘doing some research’ (following the fireworks from the Governor’s Mansion and the other official recipients which had erupted on receipt of Mr Cottrell’s 39-page facsimiles on 9th March), and had ‘established’ that:

• ‘The last four digits of [Mr Cottrell’s] Social Security Number on a 2004 tax return’ have been transposed, ‘and that these last four digits corresponded to the last four digits of the Social Security Number belonging to Mr Salvatore R. DeFrancesco’.

• This ‘somehow’ explained why Salvatore R. DeFrancesco appeared as Secretary for Pennsylvania Investments, Inc, – except that it DIDN’T. THERE WAS NO CONNECTION. THAT WAS A LIE.

PREPARATIONS FOR THEFT PUT IN PLACE SEVEN YEARS AGO:
ASSUMPTION THAT THE PAYMASTER WOULD COOPERATE
Deeper forensic consideration yields the following findings:

(1): The PA Corporate Tax Reports for 2004, 2006 and 2007 faxed to the Editor of this service are PRINTED REPORTS with all the entries inserted via the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue’s computerized system: i.e., the entries to procure the print-outs were inserted BY THE STATE AUTHORITIES themselves, NOT BY MR COTTRELL.

• The authorities are responsible for inserting the data for their print-outs.

These printed documents are signed by Mr Cottrell, and it is true that he missed the transposition of the two first digits of his Social Security Number when he signed the PA Corporate Tax report 2004 (and 2003 and 2005): but THE ERROR WAS THE TAX DEPARTMENT’S ‘ERROR’, because the document was generated by the tax authorities themselves.

• Contrary, therefore, to a subsidiary assertion by Ms. Julie A. Castillo, the ‘error’ was originated by the Pennsylvania tax authorities, NOT by Mr Cottrell.

(2): Which implies RATHER CLEARLY that this little entrapment mechanism was planned at least seven years ago – that is to say, not long after the stealing of Mr Cottrell’s Deutsche Bank A.G. contract and the ‘electronic stealing’ of his signature exposed recently in these reports, with the ultimate proceeds of that theft and the hijacking of his transactions being credited to Deutsche AG. (formerly Barrington Investment Group), St Gallen, Switzerland, the partners of which are George H. W. Bush Sr., Mikhail Gorbachëv, Dr Helmut Kohl and Dr Joseph Ackermann.

• WE HAVE NO DOUBT THAT GEORGE BUSH SENIOR, GORBACHEV, KOHL
AND ACKERMANN WERE EXPECTING TO SPLIT THE QUEEN’S $6.2 TRILLION
BETWEEN THEM, VIA DEUTSCHE A.G.. THAT WAS THE INTENTION.

(3): This deduction appears to contradict our working assumption cited above that the insertion of our ‘Italian community’ non-friend, Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, was effected IN A HELLUVA RUSH in connection with/following or coincident with the visit of President Obama to Pennsylvania – given that we have been definitively informed that President Obama was behind this attempted theft (on behalf of the Collective of Criminal Presidents).

However we think that what happened was that this long-laid bureaucratic enmeshment trap, which had been dormant for seven years, was ACTIVATED IN A HURRY so as to ‘facilitate’ the immediate stealing and diversion of Mr Cottrell’s $11.0 billion and the $6.2 trillion sovereign loan funds, which were to have been deposited on 9th March 2010: and this assessment appears to be the conclusion of the Chinese authorities, as well.

(4): The transposition of two of the last four digits of Michael Cottrell’s Social Security Number IS OF COURSE COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT to the matter in hand, since it does not ‘AUTHORISE’ the surfacing of the impostor Salvatore R. DeFrancesco as SECRETARY of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. on the Pennsylvania Department of State’s screen for corporation ##844244.

(5): Therefore, the ‘explanation’ proffered by Ms. Julie A. Castillo [717-705 6087] is proven to be SPURIOUS, DISINGENUOUS, IMPERTINENT, OBFUSCATORY, DIVERSIONARY, AND IRRELEVANT.
The ‘explanation’ generated in extremis under pressure by Pennsylvania’s Department of Revenue DOES NOT ‘EXPLAIN’ the fraudulent appearance of a noted member of ‘the US Italian community’ as Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., immediately ahead of the large payouts in question.

(6): The criminal crudity of this dirty little pre-planned stratagem with colossal implications for the WHOLE WORLD is self-evident, not least since it begs the subsidiary question: if Madam Julie A. Castillo’s ‘explanation’, is pertinent, why did Salvatore R. DeFranceso not appear as Secretary on the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue’s successive PA Corporate Tax Reports print-outs for Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., back in 2004 (2003 and 2005)? Problem: In 2004, the Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. was shown as Michael Cottrell, so that ‘couldn’t happen’.

(7): SO: On subsequent PA Corporate Tax Reports for Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., Michael Cottrell’s name was REMOVED from the entry on the Department’s print-outs showing him as SECRETARY, in readiness for this diabolical criminal operation, see?

IN OTHER WORDS, THE EVIDENCE SHOWS THAT A CRIMINAL THEFT FROM PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC., on top of the theft of Mr Cottrell’s Deutsche Bank AG contract and the ‘electronic stealing’ of his signature, WAS PLANNED AS LONG AGO AS 2003-2005.

(8): There can be little doubt that if this outrageous criminal operation, masterminded in its most recent phase by the Obama White House, had not been spotted in time, the $15.0 billion and the $6.2 trillion sovereign loan funds WOULD HAVE BEEN DIVERTED/STOLEN, as was clearly intended – the underlying practical assumption being, no doubt, that this would have been achievable with the enthusiastic participation of the Paymaster, who would have been handsomely ‘paid off’ for his practical assistance in facilitating the stealing of The Queen’s loan funds by George Bush Senior, Mikhail Gorbachev, Helmut Kohl and the CEO of Deutsche Bank, Dr Joseph Ackermann.

• That’s how these people operate.

SUMMARY OF THE PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD
So this colossal aborted criminal operation represented a blatant, rushed, yet long preplanned, reckless, brazen attempt by the President of the United States, Barack Obama, in conjunction with the Collective of Criminal Presidents and their co-conspiring associates, of which Mr Obama is the de facto Chairman, to steal Mr Cottrell’s $11.0 billion and to re-steal the $6.2 trillion sovereign loan funds which the Basel instructions require to be paid into the Securities Account held with Morgan Stanley & Co, New York, NY, of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., for the sole purpose of financing the transparent, on-the-books, fully taxable US Dollar Refunding process, which remains the ONLY solution to the crisis and has long been approved by the Group of Seven financial powers.

We have further definitive official confirmation from our special sources, that this ‘is what the instructions say’. We also have information to the effect that since Mr A. Clifton Hodges’ letter to the Editor of this service which we were recently asked to forward to Buckingham Palace, there has been ‘heightened activity’ from London in this overall context.

What distinguishes this brazen attempted giga-theft from its multiple predecessors is that, given the much more intense scrutiny of the behaviour of these organised criminals holding the highest offices in the United States, the perpetrators were caught IN FLAGRANTE, in real-time.

In their greedy RUSH and lust to re-seize these funds illegally for their own gross purposes and self-enrichment, that ‘Italian’ character linked to Bush and Obama was intentionally and illegally inserted as ‘SECRETARY’ of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. immediately ahead of the relevant intended ‘Settlements’ payments, so that Salvatore R. DeFrancesco could instruct the Paymaster to divert the funds corruptly into bank accounts designated by the Collective of Criminal Presidents.

The operation had, as we have seen, all the hallmarks of having been devised under pressure and in a rush, albeit having been planned many years in advance in anticipation of such a contingency.

The payments were imminent, and there was not much that could continue to be done to block them: so emergency criminal measures needed to be taken to divert the funds at the point of remittance. Any problems arising from the theft could be ‘sorted out’ later.

We can see from the lame, concocted bureaucratic ‘clerical error’ explanation put forward in the phone call from Ms. Julie A. Castillo of the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue to Mr Cottrell between 11:11 a.m. and 11:17 a.m. on 10th March 2010 from 717-705 6087, that the bureaucratic back-stop had to be invoked in a terrible hurry – which was why Ms. Castillo came up hurriedly with such a completely disconnected and ludicrous insult to our intelligence with her unrelated invocation of ‘four’ Social Security digits allegedly mixed up back in 2004, which of course had nothing to do with the surfacing of Salvatore R. DeFrancesco as ‘Secretary’ of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

And what further emerges from this is that Ms. Castillo inadvertently ADMITTED that the criminal stratagem to steal funds that we have exposed had indeed been activated. This can be deduced from the fact of the disconnect between the ‘explanation’ and the fact of the member of the ‘Italian community’s’ appearance on the Pennsylvania Department of State’s screen. Because, as you will now readily concur, the very fact that THERE IS NO CONNECTION reveals precisely that THEY HAVE ADMITTED THE EXISTENCE OF THE CRIMINAL STRATEGY TO STEAL THE FUNDS.

• In other words, THEY BLURTED OUT THE ESSENCE OF THEIR CRIME.

Put another way, such a connection could ONLY be made by the criminal minds involved, given that there is no logical connection. So they have COMPOUNDED THEIR BLUNDER: they have actually confirmed the pinpoint accuracy of the conclusion from this forensic analysis.

• That, in turn, means that some or all of the recipients of Mr Cottrell’s faxes dated 9th March are CO-CONSPIRATORS in a colossal attempted fraudulent transaction the purpose of which was to STEAL THE FUNDS LOANED BY THE QUEEN PRO BONO PUBLICO IN ORDER TO FINANCE THE REFUNDING OF THE U.S. DOLLAR. And since we know that Mr Barack Obama and his White House precipitated this attempted hijacking operation, President Obama and his criminal cronies within and adjacent to the Beltway de facto ‘work for’ Bush, Gorbachev, Kohl and Ackermann.

For future reference, please take on board the criminal modus operandi explained above that is routinely used in the United States for such scamming operations: always to embed a STATE (NOT a Federal, but always a STATE) bureaucracy within the structured framework of the intended criminal giga-theft – for use as a ‘back-stop’ device, should the heist be exposed.

• That way, State officials, elected or career, always get the blame, and the whole operation disappears into a bureaucratic black hole hundreds of miles away from the Beltway.

Imagine how difficult it would have been to prove that the funds had been stolen, if this outrage had not been discovered in time to compel the criminals to abort their botched operation.

DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD

At about lunchtime UK time on 9th March 2010, the Editor’s fax machine delivered a large number of pages on Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. letterheading addressed to:

(1): Edward G. Rendell, Governor of Pennsylvania.
(2): Pedro A. Cortes, Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
(3): Tom Corbett, Attorney general of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
(4); Robert S. Cessar, United States Attorney, Pittsburgh, PA.
(5): A Clifton Hodges, Esq., Hodges and Associates, Pasadena, CA.
(6): Mr William Bonney, Sr., BOLDCAP.
(7): Mr Dana V. Wilcox.

Selected documents that were forwarded by fax and US mail by Mr Cottrell in the face of this criminal provocation were as follows:

……………………………………………………………………………….

(1): FAX COVER
PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814- 453 4453
Email: pii-mcc@msn.com

TO: Pennsylvania Department of State
401 North Street, Room 206
P.O. Box 8722
Harrisburg, PA 17105-8721

Attention: Ms. Butler, Supervisor

Via: Fax: 717-783 2244

ITEMS ENCLOSED:
(1): Letter of Notification regarding: Fraudulent Entry on www.corporatyions.state.pa.u./corp by person(s) unknown against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. [3/8.2010]: 3 Pages
(2): Exhibit “A”: 12 Pages
(3): Exhibit “B”: 5 Pages
(4): Exhibit “C”: 3 Pages
(5): Exhibit “D”: 15 Pages.

Number of pages including cover: 39
9 March 2010
……………………………………………………………………………….

(2): LETTER OF NOTIFICATION TO
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE:

PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814- 453 4453
Email: pii-mcc@msn.com

TO: Pennsylvania Department of State
401 North Street, Room 206
P.O. Box 8722
Harrisburg, PA 17105-8721

Attention: Ms. Butler, Supervisor

Reference:
Due Diligence Accounts Payable [Nov 19th, 2004 to March 25th, 2008]

RE: FRAUDULENT ENTRY ON www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp BY PERSON(S) unknown against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. (3/8/2010)

Via: Fax: 717-783 2244/ AND U.S. MAIL

Dear Ms. Butler:
Per our conversation this date, between approximately 9:34 a.m. EST and 9:40 a.m. EST, I stated to you that Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. is to receive funds in the amount of Fifteen Billion United States Dollars ($15,000,000,000.00 USD):

[Ref: Exhibit “B, Page 1” Payables Due with the Due Diligence Documentation Part 1 and Part 2, dated November 19, 2004 to March 23, 2008]

derived from a “Settlement” between the United States of America, the World Court, the People’s Republic of China, with the signed approval of President Barack Obama, and a loan of Six Point Two Trillion United States Dollars ($6,200,000,000,000.00 USD) to Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., via Her Majesty, the Queen of England (Sovereign of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) for the purpose of a Private Funding Refunding of the United States Dollar (Ref: Exhibit “B” Pages 2-4, an Affidavit submitted to Her Majesty, et al. On 29 December 2008).

Additionally, I stated to you that Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. (including Michael C. Cottrell) will pay an amount of Pennsylvania Corporate and Personal taxes of approximately Four Hundred and Ninety-Five Million United States Dollars ($495,000,000.00 USD) from this “Settlement” process.

Page 2: RE: FRAUDULENT ENTRY ON www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp BY PERSON(S) unknown against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. (3/8/2010):

However, the Pennsylvania Department of State has now become [a] knowing or unknowing participant in the ongoing fraudulent activities [being] attempted to divert said funds and the payment of Pennsylvania Corporate Taxes and/or to steal and place said funds in “off-balance sheet account(s)” with the aid of bank and political fraudsters – located in London (UK), Paris (France), Geneva (Switzerland), Houston and Dallas (Texas), Washington, D.C., and various locations in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

The above referenced fraudulent activity is evidenced by the placement of “SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO as SECRETARY” as Officer of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. screen dated March 8, 2010 WITHOUT a correspondent Amendment of Articles – WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE OR APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTORS/OWNERS OF PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.

Therefore, this corporation hereby demands that the name “SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO as SECRETARY” BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY FROM THE SCREEN PAGE IDENTIFYING ENTITY 844244: PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC., 1157 WEST 7TH STREET, ERIE PA 16502-0.

Further, this corporation demands an investigation and a FULL REPORT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS – as to who gave the authority for this name to be placed on said screen, what evidence [exists] of authorization granting said person the position of SECRETARY for this corporation, and what action will be taken against said person committing the fraudulent entry.

If the offending item is not removed immediately upon the facsimile receipt of this letter and documentation, this corporation will move legally for fraud against the Secretary of the Commonwealth, the Honorable Pedro A Cortes, et al., and against SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO (INDIVIDUALLY AND SEVERALLY) for Fraud against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., for THREE (3) TIMES DAMAGES, e.g., FORTY-FIVE BILLION UNITED STATES DOLLARS ($45,000,000,000.00 USD) – since the payment is IMMINENT and therefore the screen identified can be used to divert or steal the aforementioned funds, e.g. [for account of] FIDELITY DEPOSIT & DISCOUNT BANK, et al., and/or PENN ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, et al..

This firm has NO ACCOUNTS with either. The stated funds are to be deposited with this firm’s identified Securities Account at Morgan Stanley & Co, New York, NY.

Page 3: RE: FRAUDULENT ENTRY ON www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp BY PERSON(S) unknown against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. (3/8/2010):

Thank you for your immediate attention and assistance in this matter.

Regards,

Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S.
President, CEO and Secretary
Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502-1106

Reference:
Exhibit “A”: Pages 1 thru 11;
Exhibit “B”: Pages 1 thru 4;
Exhibit “C”: Pages 1 and 2;
Exhibit “D”: Pages 1 thru 13.

CC:
(1): The Honorable Edward G. Rendell, Governor of Pennsylvania
(2): The Honorable Pedro A Cortes, Secretary of the Commonwealth
(3): The Honorable Tom Corbett, Pennsylvania Attorney General
(4): Robert S. Cessar, United States Attorney, Pittsburgh, PA
(5): A. Clifton Hodges, Esq., Hodges and Associates, 4 East Holly Street,
Suite 202, Pasadena, CA 91103
(6): Mr William Bonney, Sr., BOLDCAP
(7): Mr Dana V. Wilcox

……………………………………………………………………………….

(3): EXHIBIT “A”: WE REPRODUCE HEREWITH ONLY THE LIST OF ITEMS, LABELLED A-1 TO A-11 THAT ACCOMPANIED THE FOREGOING LETTER OF NOTIFICATION [BY FAX AND U.S. MAIL]. The Editor of this service holds copies of ALL these documents on file:

EXHIBIT “A”:

A-01: Contact Information; Pennsylvania Department of State.

A-02: Identification Screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/8/2010 [falsely] identifying SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESO as SECRETARY of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc..

A-03: Identification Screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/9/2010 indicating that NO AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES WAS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPT OF STATE AUTHORIZING CHANGE OF OFFICERS.

A-04: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. Articles of Incorporation ID # 8475-907.

A-05: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. Articles of Incorporation ID # 8475-906 identifying ALL DIRECTORS/OWNERS OF THE CORPORATION [Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.].

A-06: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. Articles of Incorporation ID # 8475-905 identifying ENTITY NUMBER 844244 and the address of the corporation [Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.].

A-07: Oath of Publication Notice, The Erie Daily Times, dated 9 January 1985.

A-08: Google search for SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO dated 3/9/2010, page 1.

A-09: Google search for SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO dated 3/9/2010, page 2.

A-10: FORBES.COM screen identifying SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO, page 1.

A-11: FORBES.COM screen identifying SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO, page 2.
……………………………………………………………………………….

(4): EXHIBIT “B”: Pages B-1 thru 4:
Item:

AFFIDAVIT SUBMITTED TO HER MAJESTY, THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND [SOVEREIGN OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND] on 29 December 2008 via Mr Christopher Story, FRSA, 108 Horseferry Road, Westminster, London SW1P 2EF, United Kingdom:
[01144-02[0] 7222 3836 or 1-800-661-4809].

PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814- 453 4453
Email: pii-mcc@msn.com
29 DECEMBER 2008

I, Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., do hereby swear and affirm the following facts:

1: That on December 13, 2008 between approximately 4:47 pm EST and 4:52 p.m. EST, I placed a telephone call to Mr William Bonney, Sr., – during which he notified me of the following:

(a) My relationship with Delmarva Timber Trust, et al., has caused a legal concern that will prevent me from taking economic receipt of any funds regarding the Payables Due within the Due Diligence Documentation Part 1 and Part 2 (dated November 19, 2004) to March 23, 2008) presented to Mr Bonney on May 17, 2008, at Madison, Ohio;

[Reference: Delmarva Timber Trust [R.E.I.T.] – Owen C. Meddles, Dana V. Wilcox, Michael C. Cottrell, et al.: Allocation for Release of Blocked Funds License Application Submitted to the United States Department of Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control: Exhibits: COPY No. 004 – # 1-A, #1-B, #1-C, #1-D, #3, #5, #14, #15, #G-6, #G-4, #G-2, and #G-1].

(b) That my participation in the attempted recovery of said funds for and on behalf of Delmarva Timber Trust, et al., has caused President George W. Bush’s Administration discomfort sufficient to warrant Mr Bonney’s personal guarantee to arbitrate the “differences between the White House/Leo (Lee) E. Wanta, and Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S.”.

[Reference: Delmarva Timber Trust [R.E.I.T.] – Owen C. Meddles, Dana V. Wilcox, Mrs Cheryl D. (Meddles) Torres, Michael C. Cottrell, et al.: Letter and packet, dated January 15, 2002, delivered to: The Honorable Richard B. Cheney, Vice President of the United States, The White House/West Wing Executive Offices. Exhibits: COPY #0003: pp #1 of 3, #2 of 3, #3 of 3: Encl C; Encl E; Encl F].

(c) That ALL of my personal and corporate telephone calls are recorded and transcribed at Fort Meade (NSC), et al. and are submitted to the White House.

2: That on December 26, 2008, between approximately 7:31 a.m. EST and 7:34 a.m. EST, I placed a telephone call to Mr William Bonney, Sr., and was notified of the following items:

(a) That access to the “Settlement Funds” would commence on December 26th or serious consequences for the “Bush Administrations, et al.” will occur;

(b) That regarding Leo Wanta (Wanta Plan Funds), the “big guys” have determined that President G. W. Bush will fight to release the funds until after January 20, 2009, that the “big guys” have decided not to fight him for said reason before January 20th;

(c) That the “big guys” will wait until President Obama’s Economic Team presents the “Obama Plan” approximately on January 29, 2009;

(d) That the Obama Administration will “go with the G-7 Plan, but with ‘safeguards’, since ‘others’ do not have experience with such large funds”; and:

(e) That Mr Bonney has an agenda that must be accomplished first.

3: That Mr Dana V. Wilcox, as Financial Consultant, and Michael C. Cottrell, as Secretary and Trustee of Delmarva Timber trust [R.E.I.T.] physically delivered and paid for the recording of the Articles of Amendment to the Trust, therefore, reinstating the Delmarva Timber Trust as an Active Trust with Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation on March 28, 2001 at 10:57 a.m. EST.

4: That, during the 1980s and 1990s, until October 17, 1992, Col. Dana V. Wilcox (now retired: Richmond, Virginia, USA):

• As CEO of Errickson, Inc. and acting for and on behalf of Owen C. Meddles/Delmarva Timber Trust, et al..

• actively participated in the “last proper refunding of the US Dollar” with the cooperation and participation of:

• Col. Kok Howe Kwong, of the People’s Republic of China, via:

• Aneko Credit Pte Ltd, Singapore, Hong Kong and Austria.

5: That the aforementioned Private Funding Refunding Operation of the US Dollar was initiated by President Ronald W. Reagan, via the communiqué on August 17, 1982 and agreed upon as a result of President Reagan’s State Visit to the People’s Republic of China in April 1984.

6: That on September 12, 2006 between approximately 8:37 a.m. EST and 8:52 a.m. EST, Dr Dana V. Wilcox telephoned me and discussed the following items:

(a) That the abovementioned items combined with the current sub-prime/derivative debacle now requires a new Private Funding Refunding Operation for the US Dollar – without US Govt. funding;

(b) That the new refunding flow charts would resemble the flow charts Delmarva Timber Trust, et al., had developed under Mr Wilcox and Mr Cottrell’

(c) That said flow chart system identified joint venture projects between Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., and Delmarva Timber Trust, et al., to create new tax incentives and full tax payment to the US Government, et al., as part of the refunding process, and to fund numerous low-income housing, waste management, other infrastructure projects, administration auditing teams for the projects;

(d) That these flow charts and processes were the actual basis of the “Wanta Plan” activities, as presented to Mr Christopher Story FRSA by Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., March 15 and 16, 2006;

(d*) That Mr Wilcox agreed upon receipt of the G-7 Refunding Funds to Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. Securities Account at Morgan Stanley NYC, per the “Wanta/Group of-Seven Plan”, he would act as “Consultant at least’ for Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A.,, M.S., and Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.;

(e*) That the people identified within the proposed Obama Economic Team – i.e., Dr Ben Bernanke, Mr Robert Rubin, Mr Timothy Geithner, Mr Lawrence Summers, Mr Paul Volcker, and specifically Mr Rahm Emanuel (Wasserstein Perella & Co.) – may have been tainted, by the actions of previous Presidential Administrations since 1981, and, therefore, may require “safeguards” that ensure the demise or hinder the effectiveness of the “Private Funding Refunding Operation of the US Dollar”;

(f*) That Mr Wilcox and Mr Cottrell believe the release of the aforementioned funds would demand a transparent presidency and a country operating under the Rule of Law. Only a proper privately funded refunding with third party auditing – not the President’s Cabinet as the auditing party – will allow the US Dollar to regain its capitalization value and renew the world’s international trading markets with full disclosure and transparent regulation.

7: That in reference to the sworn Affidavit signed and dated September 5, 2008, and submitted via Mr Christopher Story FRSA:

• I have not received an answer back concerning the question posed to Mr Thomas J. Melville, Jr., or his contact ‘J.B.” at the US Treasury Compliance Department, New York;

8: Therefore, I respectfully request the World Court and HMQ allow the directed “G-7” nations to operate the refunding program via the “Wanta Plan” commitment with Pennsylvania Investments, Inc./Mr Dana V. Wilcox to be executed with the designated funds from the Six Point Two Trillion USD as a “loan” via the Bank of England, to the Bank of New York Mellon (19-20 June 2007) to Morgan Stanley Securities Account of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

A copy of this affirmation shall have the same effect and force as the original.

I, Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., President of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., located at 1157 West 7th Street, Erie, PA, 16502, United States Passport No. 205125335, do hereby swear and affirm that the above information is true and factual.

[Signed]
Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. Dare: 12-29-2008
President
Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814-453 4453

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
NOTARIAL SEAL
Raemarie T. Kovaly – Notary Public
CITY OF ERIE, ERIE COUNTY
My Commission expires Aug. 03, 2012
12-29-2008

* As original. Not amended by the editor here.
……………………………………………………………………………….

(5): EXHIBIT “C”: Pages C-1 thru 2:
Item: CORPORATE AND PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE OF
MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S.:

Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814-453 4453
Email: pii-mcc@msn.com

CORPORATE AND PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:

• DECEMBER 1984 TO PRESENT:
PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
PRESIDENT, CEO, TREASURER AND SECRETARY

Developed and executed marketing strategies to promote the sale of Investment Advisory Asset Allocation and Risk Analysis, Mutual Funds, and Cash Management services to Pension Plan Sponsors.

Marketed Investment Advisory Services and Mutual Funds to Pension Plans (Low to Mid Size: $10 million – $100 million) while training registered Representatives on the following techniques: cold calling approaches, sales presentation methods, and closes.

Marketed Investment Advisory Services and products to NYSE Broker/Dealers in a Twenty-Five (25) State Region.

Conducted advanced sales seminars for Registered Representatives: Development and acceptance of “market timing”, defined benefit/contribution plans; 501(k) plans; third party performance verification (SEI); marketing methods for fixed income and Pooled CIGs.

Developed, published, and marketed PENNSEARCH: RISK & ASSET ALLOCATION ANALYSIS: based on Sharpe’s Single-Index Beta Model and Morley Capital’s “Compass” program. Provided Investment Analysis/Advisory Services to Pension Plan Sponsors and TPAs

• JANUARY 1990 – TO MAY 1993:
NIAGARA SECURITIES, INC.
PRESIDENT and GENERAL SECURITIES PRINCIPAL

General Securities Broker/Dealer approved by N.A.S.D and S.E.C.
Securities Licensed Series 24, General Securities Principal.

Developed (with Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.) a Public/Private $55 Million – $60 Million AFFORDABLE HOUSING VENTURE CAPITAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP for housing the Homeless, mentally and/or physically challenged. Renewed and endorsed by the Pittsburgh Regional Office for the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Approved by Youngstown City Council (April 1990) for initial funding for WestWind Foundation.

• JANUARY 1983 TO JUNE 1984:
E. F. HUTTON and COMPANY, INC.
PENSION CONSULTANT/INSURANCE SPECIALIST

Promoted E.F. Hutton Universal Life Products and implemented training programs for the Account Executives to coordinate an effective program of capturing client assets.

• 1970 to 1976:
U.S. NAVY, ACTIVE DUTY, HONORABLY DISCHARGED:
AVIATION METEOROLOGY: FLEET WEATHER CENTRAL,
NAS NORFOLK, VA; USS AMERICA CVN-66

• LICENSING AND ACADEMIC BACKGROUND:
N.A.S.D. & S.E.C.:
SERIES 24, November 1987
SERIES 7, November 1983
SERIES 63, December 1983

ASSOCIATE MEMBER:
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (2003)

MERCYHURST COLLEGE:
Master of Science, 2002
Administration of Justice

National Criminal Justice Honor Society (April 2001)

PENN STATE UNIVERSITY:
Paralegal Certificate, 1998

PENN STATE UNIVERSITY:
B.A. Political Science, 1978

• PUBLISHED MATERIAL:
‘Elite Power and Capital Markets’:
Master of Science Thesis identifying a topology of deviant financial activities that include:
Political-Financial, Entity-Financial, and White-Collar (criminal) Financial Activities.

These activities illustrate political deviance evolution, involving: wealth, access, knowledge, obfuscation, and denial.

‘Pennsearch’:
A description of a portfolio/asset allocation and efficient frontier analysis system based on the client’s desired rate of return, the risk level, and various measurement standards used to evaluate the portfolio investment performance.

……………………………………………………………………………….

(6): EXHIBIT “D”: List of documents submitted with the Letter of Notification and related papers addressed to the Pennsylvania Department of State and sent by facsimile and US Mail on 9th March 2010. The documents listed here are not displayed, but the Editor holds paper copies of each of them on file. [Note: When ongoing work on our upgraded website is complete, we will be able to display such documents: but the Editor was unwilling to proceed with the revised website, which was meant to have been complete by January, without further modifications, which are in hand].

D-01: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/9/2010 [falsely] identifying SALVATORE R DEFRANCESCO as SECRETARY of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

D-02: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/9/2010 indication that NO AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES WAS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPT. OF STATE AUTHORIZING CHANGE OF OFFICERS.

D-03: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 5/9/2009.

D-04: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/9/2009.

D-05: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 12/18/2008.

D-06: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 12/22/2008

D-07: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 12/22/2008.

D-08: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 5/15/2008.

D-09: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 5/15/2008.

D-10: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/27/2008.

D-11: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/27/2008.

D-12: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 10/1/2006.

D-13: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 4/6/2005.

NOTE: ON REQUEST, THE EDITOR WILL FAX COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS LISTED BELOW, PROVING THE FRAUD, TO APPLICANTS WHO SEND US AN EMAIL REQUESTING THEM.

• Please press CONTACT US in the Red Box below, which sends the Editor an email. You MUST include your full coordinates, including of course your fax number. We will NOT oblige applicants for this add-on who withhold any detail of their coordinates (name, address, telephone number, proper identity: not a pseudonym, etc): if we discern that any detail in the coordinates does not ring true, we will not respond.

The documents that will be forwarded by fax are as follows:

THE PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD:
SPECIAL ADD-ON FAX: PAGE ONE:
D-01: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/9/2010 [falsely] identifying SALVATORE R DEFRANCESCO as SECRETARY of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. This member of the US ‘Italian community’ IS A CRIMINAL IMPOSTOR.

THE PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD:
SPECIAL ADD-ON FAX: PAGE TWO
D-02: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/9/2010 indicating that NO AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES HAD BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE DEPT. OF STATE AUTHORIZING CHANGE OF OFFICERS.

THE PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD:
SPECIAL ADD-ON FAX: PAGE THREE
D-03: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 5/9/2009, showing Michael C. Cottrell as President but OMITTING his earlier designation as SECRETARY, despite the fact that NO AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES HAD BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE DEPT. OF STATE AUTHORIZING CHANGE OF OFFICERS.

THE PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD:
SPECIAL ADD-ON FAX: PAGE FOUR
NEW: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/10.2010, taken at 2:02pm EST, showing that the impostor SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO as SECRETARY of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., had been removed from the screen.

(7) APPENDIX:
The following document was not included in the urgent fax sent by Mr Cottrell dated 9th March 2010 to the Pennsylvania Department of State but is included herewith for reference:

PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814- 453 4453
Email: pii-mcc@msn.com

16 NOVEMBER 2005

CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION OF CORPORATE RESOLUTION

I hereby certify that at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, held on the 16th day of November 2005 at which said meeting a quorum was present and acting throughout, the following resolutions were adopted and ever since have been and now are in full force and effect:

RESOLVED,
that US Dollar account(s) be established at Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated located at 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10020.

RESOLVED,
that Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., as President and Secretary, is hereby empowered with full legal authority to sign any necessary documents to open and conduct business within said account(s) on behalf of this Corporation;

FURTHER RESOLVED, that Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., is hereby granted authority to make, execute, and deliver, any and all written instructions necessary or proper to effectuate the authority hereby conferred to sign any and all necessary documents required to execute instructions regarding activities within said account(s).

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my signature for said corporation this 16th day of November, 2005.

[Signed]
Michael C. Cottrell
President and Secretary
Date: 11-16-2005

[Signed]
Diane R Bertolini-Cottrell, B.A., M.A.
Shareholder
Date: 11-16-2005.

• 20TH MARCH 2010: ANOTHER CAVALIER DIVERSIONARY ATTACK ON THE EDITOR
We understand that the notoriously cavalier CIA/FBI/DVD disinformation and fabrication operative, Thomas Heneghan, who specialises in diversionary agitation and propaganda rather than informing readers objectively, has published a further gratuitous attack on the Editor of this service, citing International Currency Review as his source. That’s odd, because the issue he cites doesn’t exist.

International Currency Review, Volume 35, Numbers 1 & 2 is on machine for the rest of March and so has not been published yet. It will be distributed worldwide in April 2010.

Since this notorious US agitprop operative cannot even be bothered to get his citations right, his prognostications and distortions retain as little credibility as the fake ‘Principality of Snake Hill’, Australia, which his client, Mr Wanta, is desperately perpetuating in order to sustain his creaking false credentials as ‘Ambassador’.

As this fake ‘Principality’ does not exist, no State Department or United Nations authentication of Wanta’s fraudulent Ambassadorship for the Principality of Snake Hill to the United States exists, either. On 20th September 2009 and in subsequent reports, we demonstrated before the whole world that ‘The Principality of Snake Hill’ is fraudulent. Therefore, Heneghan and Wanta must be suffering from an advanced form of mental disease, insisting that black is white, lies are the truth and vice versa, which is what people who lie all their lives wind up doing as they go mad.

For the record, and for the n’th time, here is the irrefutable proof that The Principality of Snake
Hill, Australia, is a crude fabrication (using a Washington, DC (202) number supplied for Wanta’s misuse by the French Embassy when M. Levitte, now President Sarkozy’s intelligence adviser in Paris, was French Ambassador to the United States. France covers for Germany under the Treaty of the Elysee [January 1963], providing DVD ‘Black’ operatives with cover). Ms Brenda Farrell of the Australian Embassy, Dublin, responded to our Irish associate, Richard Sharpe, as indicated in the segment reproduced from our report dated 20th September 2009 [see Archive] below:

‘PRINCIPALITY OF SNAKE HILL DOES NOT EXIST’: AUSTRALIAN EMBASSY, DUBLIN
On Wednesday 23rd September 2009, our Irish friend and associate, Mr Richard Sharpe, obtained independent confirmation from Ms. Brenda Farrell, of the Australian Embassy in Dublin, that ‘The Principality of Snake Hill’ does not exist, thereby reconfirming that the entire ‘Snake Hill’ operation is, as we explained in exhaustive detail below [i.e., in the report of 20 September], FRAUDULENT.

• This definitively destroys the bona fides and reputations of the poseurs and serial deception operatives exposed in this report, and should terminate the destructive activities of these people once and for all. They are FINISHED. They have been CAUGHT OUT. Before the whole world.

Forwarded message
From: <richardsharpe@eircom.net>
Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:25 PM
Subject: Fwd: Principality of Snake Hill [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
To: mrrichardsharpe <mrrichardsharpe@gmail.com>

richardsharpe@eircom.net wrote:
Many thanks for your timely response.

Regards
Richard

“Austremb Dublin” <Austremb.Dublin@dfat.gov.au> wrote:

Dear Mr Sharpe,

Thank you for your email.

There is no principality in Australia.

Kind regards

Australian Embassy
Dublin
Tel: +353 (0) 1 664 5300
Fax: +353 (0) 1 678 5185

richardsharpe@eircom.net

A reminder of just how cavalier the self-discrediting Heneghan, who opened bank accounts for al-Qaeda-funding Marvelous Investments Limited on behalf of Wanta (who, being a felon, cannot open or own any bank account) is with his fabricated facts, followed the foregoing definitive debunking of the ‘Principality of Snake Hill’ deception which Wanta is perpetuating in order to sustain his own mental delusion that he is an Ambassador, which is not the case:

THE EDITOR REMAINS IN NEW YORK
AND DID NOT ‘FLEE THE UNITED STATES’
The fantasmogorical allegation by a notorious US disinformation operative exposed in this report [Heneghan], that the Editor of this service fled the United States on Friday 18th September in order to escape arrest by the US Marshals Service, is inconsistent with the actual fact that the Editor is working ‘as we speak’ in his New York City office premises [as of 23rd September 2009*].

There is no need to labour the point that, given this stupid invention, none of the dogmatic statements that this notorious disinformation operative posts can ever command respect.

The fabrications of this and other notorious US disinformation artists have long since destroyed their ‘credibility’, making them a laughing stock and suggesting that the CIA disinformation apparat needs to review its operations and close many of them down.

• Their counterintelligence tradecraft seems to have become permanently counterproductive.

* The email from Ms Brenda Farrel of the Australian Embassy, Dublin, was sent and received on 23rd September. Our original report is dated 20th September, and the exposure of The Principality of Snake Hill as a fraud and a fabrication was confirmed in the Update of 23rd September 2009.

………………………………………………………………

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time AMENDING AND INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE. In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

SECURITISATION IS 100% ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. LEGISLATION

cropped-chrisstory

WHAT THE OFFICIAL RACKETEERS ARE DESPERATELY COVERING UP

Wednesday 10 March 2010 19:30

EAVESDROPPING AND CONSTANT AMERICAN TELEPHONE HARASSMENT
CONFIRM THAT THIS SERVICE IS RIGHT AT THE EPICENTRE OF THIS CRISIS

• REPORTS UPDATE: It has been decided to post this report, containing the ‘securitisation is illegal’ data, which was nearing completion when the fraud discovered on Monday and Tuesday, erupted. Our report on this monumental fraud (which we will call, for shorthand purposes, ‘the Pennsylvania Fraud’), will follow and will probably be alternated with the present analysis. The Editor has now obtained the underlying documentation on the Pennsylvania Fraud, and will be working on this exposure report immediately (so much for his regular publishing work schedule).

• MAJOR UPDATE, 12TH MARCH 2010:

OBAMA, GEITHNER AND THE D.C MEETING ON SECURITISATION
As elaborated below, securitisation in the United States is illegal and contrary to public policy.

All securitised contracts are void not least because they were created to facilitate one or more criminal acts, as explained in this presentation. By definition and US law, all contracts created to accommodate an illegal act are void.

So, what is happening in Washington, DC, ‘as we speak’? Why, a high-level meeting has been taking place to examine how SECURITISATION of FRNs can be used to dig the Obama Administration out of the void it has created by its bovine criminality and stupidity.

The prime movers of this demented, ILLEGAL activity are President Obama and Timothy Geithner, US Treasury Secretary, backed by other purblind officials such as Larry Summers. No doubt the careful timing of the publication of our exposure of securitisation here as completely illegal and contrary to the Rule of Law, will have given the underlings of these perpetrators some concern. Obama’s World Court-granted immunity from prosecution does not extend to domestic felonies.

UNITED KINGDOM: THE LAW OF PROPERTY ACT, 1925
In the United Kingdom, The Law of Property Act, 1925, particularly Section 136 which deals with assignments, makes it crystal clear that alienation by a mortgage provider of all assets that have been assigned without notice having been issued to, or permission granted by, the debtor, is void and fraudulent. Therefore, ALL SECURITISATION OPERATIONS BY FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS WITHIN THE BRITISH JURISDICTION WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN EXPLICITLY SANCTIONED IN ADVANCE BY THE MORTGAGOR, with the mortgagor fully aware of the situation, are void.

Northern Rock and all financial entities engaged in assigning, on-selling, trading and benefiting financially from such activity without notice to or the prior consent of the mortgagor, are engaged in CRIMINAL ACTIVITY. These institutions have accordingly been trading worthless paper between themselves within a fraudulent financial carousel, as repeatedly stated in these reports.

The Directors of these institutions should be investigated and prosecuted by the UK authorities: and if this does not happen, we will keep asking why not. No doubt Lord Myners [see Appendix below], the ‘City Minister’, knows the score perfectly well, and is being ‘economical with the truth’. In which case he is a co-conspirator in this criminality.

The bottom line here is that it is possible in the British jurisdiction to stop anyone who holds a contract for debt (the creditor) from passing that debt to a third party (debt collector) if they have not complied fully with The Law of Property Act 1925 and to hold them to the original contract and, therefore, to their stringent obligations to the debtor under the Consumer Credit Act, 1974. If they do not, the contract is toast and they cannot collect or sue for recovery of the debt. And the debtor is at liberty to counterclaim even if they do sue the debtor: which is another reason why they don’t do this. For this reason, no one talks about the The Law of Property Act, 1925. They will now!

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/ukpga/1925/cukpga_19250020_en_1

136 Legal assignments of things in action:
(1): Any absolute assignment by writing under the hand of the assignor (not purporting to be by
way of charge only) of any debt or other legal thing in action, OF WHICH EXPRESS NOTICE IN WRITING HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE DEBTOR, trustee or other person from whom the assignor would have been entitled to claim such debt or thing in action, is effectual in law (subject to equities having priority over the right of the assignee) to pass and transfer from the date of such notice:
(a) the legal right to such debt or thing in action;
(b) all legal and other remedies for the same; and
(c) the power to give a good discharge for the same without the concurrence of the assignor:

Provided that, if the debtor, trustee or other person liable
in respect of such debt or thing in action has notice:
(a) that the assignment is disputed by the assignor or any person claiming under him; or
(b) of any other opposing or conflicting claims to such debt or thing in action; he may, if he thinks fit, either call upon the persons making claim thereto to interplead concerning the same, or pay the debt or other thing in action into court under the provisions of the Trustee Act, 1925.

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

• UPDATES, 11TH MARCH: The outline report on the Northern Rock case, in which the bank lied in writing to the paid-up mortgagor whose Title Deeds the bank said had been ‘de-materialised’ and held on to for FIVE YEARS AFTER THE MORTGAGE HAD BEEN PAID OFF, and yet finally disgorged after five years (during which time the householder could not sell her home), has triggered much interest. So we have added some new data beneath the outline Northern Rock report below.

• Under US whistleblower legislation, the whistleblower is entitled to a proportion of the fraud uncovered, a point made to the Editor this morning, too. No doubt this will likewise help to focus the serpentine minds of the criminal operatives being exposed. 15% to 30% of $4.2 trillion, plus $6.2 trillion, plus multiple billions, is a lot of dosh. In fact 15% of $10.4 trillion is $1.56 trillion, and 30% is $3.12 trillion. OK, the percentage is usually 10%, applicable only after conviction of course. So make that $1.04 trillion, then. Such awards are naturally available only to US taxpayers: please see the next report, on The Philadelphia Fraud, identified by a US taxpayer.

• LISTENING-IN TO OUR PHONE CALLS GIVES THE GAME AWAY

• WHY DO THEY LISTEN-IN TO EVERY WORD? WE’VE COMMITTED NO CRIMES

• WE’VE BEEN HARASSED DAILY WITH OBSCENE U.S. CALLS SINCE FEBRUARY 2008

• ‘MR STORY IS A PROBLEM FOR THEM BUT THEY CAN HANDLE IT PROVIDED
WHAT HE EXPOSES IS BLOCKED FROM THE ‘MAINSTREAM’’

• AS WE’VE COMMITTED NO CRIMES, AUTHORITIES SHOULD SUPPORT WHAT WE’RE
DOING TO HELP THEM DO THE JOB THEY ARE TOO CORRUPT TO DO UNAIDED

• THEY FALL OVER THEMSELVES TO LISTEN-IN, SO THEY CAN WARN
THE GUTLESS ‘MAINSTREAM’ OUTLETS TO BLOCK OUR EXPOSURES

• ALL THEY DO IS INFORM US BY THEIR SORDID BEHAVIOUR THAT WE ARE RIGHT
‘ON MESSAGE’ – WHICH IS BEYOND STUPID OF THEM, WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT

• CRIMINALISED INTELLIGENCE POWER INCOMPATIBLE WITH SOUND GOVERNANCE

• RACKETEERS CONSTANTLY CONFRONTED WITH THE RULE OF LAW

• COWARDLY CONTROLLED NEWSPAPERS WHICH HAVE IGNORED CIMKM/CMKX

• THE DAILY TELEGRAPH: A CONTROLLED OUTLET FOR MI-6

• MI-6 ‘INTEND TO TAKE MR CHRISTOPHER STORY OUT’

• BRITISH INTELLIGENCE APPEARS TO BE BEHAVING TREACHEROUSLY, AS USUAL

• ‘MAINSTREAM’ NEWSPAPERS REVEALING THEMSELVES
TO BE CO-CONSPIRATORS IN COVERING UP THE RACKETEERING

• WHY CONFINING EXPOSURES TO THIS WEBSITE HAS BEEN
COUNTERPRODUCTIVE FROM THE RACKETEERS’ PERSPECTIVE

• OUR EXPOSURE MODUS OPERANDI: ‘WALKING IN A STRAIGHT LINE’

• QUEEN’S GOLD THEFT STILL NOT RECTIFIED:
SO, KICK THE U.S. AMBASSADOR OUT OF LONDON

• STEALING OF $4.2 TRILLION TAX MONEY ON 31ST DECEMBER 2009
STILL NOT RECTIFIED: SO MASSIVE CRIMES HAVE BEEN COMMITTED

• FISH ROTS FROM THE STINKING HEAD: WORLD COURT IMMUNITY DEMANDED
AND SCANDALOUSLY OBTAINED BY THE COLLECTIVE OF CORRUPT U.S. PRESIDENTS

• GORBACHEV MANIPULATING DEVELOPMENTS FROM HIS WING IN THE KREMLIN, AS BEFORE

• GORBACHEV, BUSH, KOHL, ACKERMANN: RACKETEERING PARTNERS IN DEUTSCHE AG.

• WANTA: THE COURIER BETWEEN BUSH SENIOR AND GORBACHEV

• WANTA’S ‘REAGAN’S JUNK-YARD DOG’ DIVERSION

• WANTA KNEW ABOUT 9/11 IN ADVANCE, LIKE VREELAND

• FRANCE COVERS FOR GERMANY UNDER TREATY OF THE ELYSEE

• FRAUDULENT WANTA ‘SNAKE HILL’ WEBSITE’S GERMAN CONNECTIONS

• CIA/DVD PRACTICE OF EXPLOITING AND STEALING OUTSIDE EXPERTISE

• THE AMERICAN INTELLIGENCE POWER WHICH HAS USURPED
THE GOVERNMENT DANCES TO THE TUNE OF FOREIGN POWERS

• WORLD REVOLUTION RACKETEERING OFFENSIVE

• ‘WALKING IN A STRAIGHT LINE’ WILL EXPOSE THE DECEPTIONS

• COTTRELL THREATENS TO SNATCH AWAY THE RACKETEERS’ COVER,
THROWING THEM INTO A MAD PANIC. THIS WAS NOT ANTICIPATED.

• THE TWO MI-6 OPERATIVES WITH THE QUEEN’S SIGNATURE:
ARE THEY WORKING FOR, OR ARE THEY DOUBLE-CROSSING THE QUEEN?

• WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THE CHINESE CURRENCY BOXES?

• GREEK DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER EQUATES NAZI GERMANY
WITH CHANCELLOR MERKEL’S STASI GERMANY

• WHAT DO THE FOUR RACKETEERS HAVE IN COMMON
WITH OTHER WELL-KNOWN DECEASED AND LIVING OPERATIVES?

• ‘FORECLOSURE ANALYSIS’ PARA-LEGAL SERVICES SPRINGING UP IN THE UNITED STATES

• NORTHERN ROCK’S LIES TO A FORMER MORTGAGOR MASKING
THE FACT THAT HER TITLE DEEDS WERE ‘OTHERWISE ENGAGED’

• SECURITISATION IS A KEY ELEMENT OF A REVOLUTIONARY ATTACK ON PRIVATE PROPERTY

• YES, A RUTHLESS, SYSTEMATIC ATTACK ON PRIVATE PROPERTY

• LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR SCAMS STILL ‘OUT THERE’

• WHY SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. AND COMMON LAW

• SECURITISATION ENTAILS GROSS VIOLATIONS OF R.I.C.O. STATUTES

• NOTWITHSTANDING THAT IT’S ILLEGAL, U.S. AUTHORITIES
CONTINUE TO PROMOTE AND ENCOURAGE SECURITISATION

• SUMMARY FORENSIC ANALYSIS PROVING THE ILLEGALITY OF SECURITISATION

• SECURITISATION: A COVER FOR TAX EVASION

• SECURITISATION VIOLATES THE U.S BANKRUPTCY CODE
AND THEREFORE ALSO CONTRAVENES PUBLIC POLICY

• SECURITISATION VIOLATES FEDERAL R.I.C.O. STATUTES

• SECURITISATION ALSO VIOLATES U.S. ANTITRUST LEGISLATION

• There is also the tenet of English law of contract which governs US law, too, that any contract entered into in order to commit a crime is (automatically) void. So what exactly do the American and British Governments think they are doing ‘accommodating’ securitisation, given this principle?

• THE ‘PHILIPPINES EXCEPTION’ BURIED IN THE CLAYTON ACT

• FANNIE MAE, FREDDIE MAC ENGAGED IN FURTHER ILLEGAL SECURITISATION:
RE-SECURITISING ALREADY SECURITISED ‘DUD’ ASSETS TO DUMP BACK ON THE BANKS

• GARY GENSLER IS NOT AS OPPOSED TO FRAUDULENT FINANCE AS HE SEEMS

• ‘GREATER TRANSPARENCY’ IS EVIDENTLY ALL GENSLER’S AFTER

• INVESTORS’ MONEY USED TO REMUNERATE WALL STREET

•’THE MONEY YOU MAKE BY MISUSING MY MONEY
IS MY MONEY‘ – I.E., THE HOME OWNER’S

• A PERVERSE AND ARROGANT OFFICIAL INTENT TO CONTINUE VIOLATING U.S. LAW

• THE DEPOSITORY TRUST & CLEARING CORPORATION IS IN OVERDRIVE

• THE FEDERAL RESERVE HAS BECOME
THE BACK-STOP GUARANTOR OF CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS

• STAGE SET FOR AN UNIMAGINABLE (AVOIDABLE)
CATASTROPHE: A DEATH-WISH

• THE DTCC’S OBLIGATIONS WAREHOUSE SERVICE

• GREATER TRANSPARENCY WON’T ELIMINATE SYSTEMIC RISK,
OR PREVENT A CONFIDENCE CRISIS

• SO, WHERE ARE YOU, MR HOLDER?

• APPENDIX: LORD MYNERS SAYS THERE MUST BE PENALTIES FOR BANK EXCESSES

• POSTSCRIPT: STIGLITZ: ‘THE AMERICAN BANKING SYSTEM IS CORRUPT’

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

LISTENING-IN TO OUR PHONE CALLS GIVES THE GAME AWAY
If we go back to square one and start asking basic questions about our experiences with these exposures, interesting answers emerge. The first question that arises is this:

• Why is it that so many intelligence eavesdroppers listen to every domestic and especially international telephone call that we make and receive?

After all, the Editor has not stolen any money, has not murdered anyone, has not abducted anyone else’s child, is not a Nazi war criminal, is not engaged in espionage, is not an agent of a foreign power, has not defrauded anyone, and is not engaged in criminal activity in any shape or form. And neither, for instance, is Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., let alone Mr A. Clifton Hodges, the Attorney for the CMKM/CMKX victims, whom the Editor speaks to quite frequently on the transatlantic line.

Is it that these eager eavesdroppers like the sound of the Editor’s voice? Do they seek knowledge from us that they could not obtain from other sources? Are we the fount of all known wisdom in the universe? What do we know and say that others don’t know and can’t say, which these decadent snoopers find so electrifying in our conversations? There must be SOME explanation for their manic preoccupation with what we have to say in our private communications.

WHY DO THEY LISTEN-IN TO EVERY WORD? WE’VE COMMITTED NO CRIMES
Because given that we have committed no crimes, and neither are we patriots terrorists, there HAS to be a coherent reason why these despicable little UK, US and foreign snooping apparatchiks rush to pick up their earpieces every time we begin a conversation – knocking over their plastic coffee cups and making a mess of their work spaces in their frantic anxiety to garner every precious nugget that falls from our lips. One can hear these scum clicking in one after the other.

Oh, the red light’s gone on, we’ve got to record what Story and his correspondents are saying. Why do they need to fall over themselves to find out what we discuss, as we have committed no crimes and are not terrorists?

And why are they routinely engaged in issuing threats against the Editor of this service, and also against Mr Cottrell, and harassing both on a routine basis – Mr Cottrell as recently as 6th March? The Editor, as previously reported, has received daily voicemail messages from a controlled MK-Ultra-style ‘Black’ US DVD nutcase via Skype (Washington, DC) since the Wanta ‘switch’ in February 2008: on some days, we have counted as many as nine such demented harassment calls.

WE’VE BEEN HARASSED DAILY WITH OBSCENE U.S. CALLS SINCE FEBRUARY 2008
These crude harassment calls, which as indicated have been continuing since the Wanta ‘switch’ in 2008, reminiscent of a DVD operation (because of their Bavarian Illuminati-style ‘Black’ content and because Germans never know when to stop, and when they have been defeated) have no effect on the Editor’s work, mind or intentions: yet some ignorant cadre inside the US component of the CIA/DVD revolutionary structures is employed, for money, to continue this illegal harassment.

They seem to think it will wear us down. Instead, the parties being worn down are those who are determined, despite our exposures of their iniquity, to continue their racketeering operations in defiance of the Rule of Law that they despise.

They never thought they would encounter any opposition, and they have been on the wrong foot ever since we stood up to them. Real opposition was never anticipated.

What arrogance! What right do these little malodorous eavesdropping twerps have to intercept our telecommunications and to record what we have to say – sending, we understand, transcripts of our coveted exchanges to the White House?

What right do the National Security Agency, GCHQ, French, Israeli and German intelligence have to listen-in to our phone calls? Are we at the apex of human understanding? Do we dispense pearls of insight and wisdom so penetrating that that these little creeps cannot develop them from other sources? Now let’s broaden our enquiry further, leading in to the next question.

‘MR STORY IS A PROBLEM FOR THEM BUT THEY CAN HANDLE IT PROVIDED
WHAT HE EXPOSES IS BLOCKED FROM THE ‘MAINSTREAM’’
As displayed at the top of our report dated 2nd March 2010, Mr A. Clifton Hodges, Attorney for the 50,000 CMKM/CMKX scamees (whose CMKM stock was exploited when 2.25 trillion PHANTOM SHARES were floated via an illegal platform from WITHIN the Securities and Exchange Commission itself, under the criminal George W. Bush Administration (between June 2004 and October 2005)), was informed by an inside source that ‘Christopher Story is a problem for them, but they think they can handle it PROVIDED that what he exposes does not spill over into the ‘mainstream’ media’ [see our report dated 2nd March 2010].

The source of this information was a US official whose job it is to ENFORCE THE LAW, not to connive in violating it for purposes of expediency.

AS WE’VE COMMITTED NO CRIMES, AUTHORITIES SHOULD SUPPORT WHAT WE’RE
DOING TO HELP THEM DO THE JOB THEY ARE TOO CORRUPT TO DO UNAIDED
One would have thought that since what we are exposing is RAMPANT RACKETEERING AND CRIMINALITY WITHIN THE U.S. GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES, as well as inside the corrupted financial institutions, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the criminal enterprise known as the Central Intelligence Agency, such US operatives and officials would be only too keen on encouraging the broad dissemination of information liable to lead to the indictment and arrest of the racketeers and criminals that are being protected within and close to the Washington Beltway.

But that is not the case! On the contrary, this and other ‘inside’ sources appear to have been engaged in a systematic operation to use Story, Cottrell and now Hodges as a foil and barrier, behind which to plan double-dealing and continued financial deception, and to deceive at least the first two named, in order – as with the original Wanta deception – to preserve a smokescreen as cover for the pursuit of racketeering ‘business as usual’ in general.

The intention here has been to try to conduct the US Dollar Refunding themselves, with FRNs – which will lead very rapidly to a catastrophe, so that the racketeers below the radar can then, so they imagine, unscramble and release their accumulated and worthless nominal ‘derivative’ values from off-balance sheet and offshore sources, for deployment (as is currently happening to some extent) for the Fascist-style purpose of snapping up real assets at firesale prices.

• That’s the goal of the World Revolution.

THEY FALL OVER THEMSELVES TO LISTEN-IN, SO THEY CAN WARN
THE GUTLESS ‘MAINSTREAM’ OUTLETS TO BLOCK OUR EXPOSURES
So, on the one hand, the eavesdroppers knock over their dirty plastic coffee cups as they fall over themselves to listen to and record what we have to say on the telephone; while on the other hand, they appear to be seeing to it that what we have to discuss, and what the Editor is exposing, never reaches beyond the in-house intelligence censorship ‘pods’ sitting inside all press rooms of the controlled ‘mainstream’ media, prompting the next question:

• Why are these manipulators so anxious to hear what we have to say and simultaneously so determined that what we have to say and expose never hits the ‘mainstream’?

After all, given that we have committed no crimes and are not terrorists, and the governments which these despicable little eavesdropping worms serve, supposedly believe in ‘democracy’ and ‘free speech’, don’t you know, it should surely follow that if the eavesdroppers consider that what we have to say is so superb and priceless, their governments would all be awfully keen that our invaluable information and insights should be spread extensively abroad so that the sum of human understanding is enhanced, to the benefit of all, the governments included, n’est-ce-pas?

ALL THEY DO IS INFORM US BY THEIR SORDID BEHAVIOUR THAT WE ARE RIGHT
‘ON MESSAGE’ – WHICH IS BEYOND STUPID OF THEM, WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT
There is of course one benefit to all this – namely, that by listening in to all our telecommunications so routinely and conspicuously, and by engaging in such persistent and futile non-stop telephone harassment (which is recorded by us for future legal reference, not listened to, and zapped), the criminal intelligence cadres concerned are signalling to us LOUD AND CLEAR that we are indeed being highly effective: otherwise they wouldn’t be wasting their time and financial resources in such underhand and counterproductive activities, would they.

So, as we have previously pointed out, these intelligence and masonic cadres are indeed plain STUPID! By their behaviour, they are telling us that we’re being effective, making a difference, and that we’re getting in the way of their racketeering operations by exposing them (as you will see from the next post!). So the confused, panicking fools are telling us all we need to know. It’s neat!

Obviously, there’s something wrong here: and one doesn’t need a first class degree in logic to be able to discern the problem. We haven’t committed any crimes and are not terrorists. Why, then, do these authorities compete among themselves not only to listen to and record what we have to say, but also to prevent the ‘mainstream’ from picking up our insights and assessments?

• ANSWER: Because the governments themselves are engaged in the very financial terrorist criminality and racketeering that we are exposing, and are terrified that the exposures will lead to what from their perspectives might become intolerable ‘unintended consequences’, with rolling outcomes that they couldn’t control. And this is in fact what is going to happen, sooner or later.

CRIMINALISED INTELLIGENCE POWER INCOMPATIBLE WITH SOUND GOVERNANCE
At this point we need to insert an obvious but almost always overlooked anomaly arising from the fact, mentioned in earlier reports, that the coexistence of criminalised, racketeering intelligence powers enjoying carte blanche to embezzle public funds and break the law (and to indulge in petty dirty tricks and bearing false witness such as those involving Gordon Thomas on behalf of MI-6: see Note (1) below), with a system supposedly based on the Rule of Law, is INCOMPATIBLE WITH SOUND GOVERNANCE – let alone with the supposed supremacy of legality.

If they prefer a system without the Rule of Law, why bother any longer with Congress and routinely rigged elections which make a mockery of democracy and just confirm that the US authorities, who hypocritically preach democracy to the Rest of the World, are indistinguishable from corrupt ‘post’-Soviet régimes, where ballot boxes (as in Ireland) are brought pre-stuffed to the polling stations?

Because the criminalised intelligence powers and those serving them:

• Exhibit open contempt for the Rule of Law, but exploit it on an open-ended basis when it suits their own nefarious purposes.

• Seek to avoid leaving traces which would contravene the law when committing their endless crimes, and yet employ every delaying and obfuscation device known to Satan, to save their own skins whenever they perceive they are themselves in danger of the full wrath of legal enforcement.

• Have failed actually to ABOLISH the Rule of Law which they exploit, injure and contravene 24/7 in their pursuit of their ‘Black’ and illegal objectives – which they imagine are ‘allowed’ in the United States thanks to the cover that they assume to be provided under the National Security Act of 1947 et seq. (the criminals’ charter).

RACKETEERS CONSTANTLY CONFRONTED WITH THE RULE OF LAW
This sick mindset was further encouraged in the United States by such ill-advised liberties as President Reagan’s counterproductive Executive Order 12333 of 1981, which catastrophically authorised US intelligence operatives to form corporations of which the operatives themselves could own the shares and which would then ostensibly ‘contract’ with the compartmentalised components of the Intelligence Power and other US agencies to perform tasks required by the Executive Branch, for which the controlling Intelligence Power acts as the clandestine arm.

Obviously, to contract with intelligence operatives who are required by Statute to deny that they are intelligence operatives and therefore to lie for a living, is equivalent to entering into a contract with the fox to guard the chicken house. Significantly, Gorbachëv’s Politburo copied this crass 1981 Reagan formula in 1990.

Therefore, while abusing and contravening the despised Rule of Law, these amoral US officials are constantly being confronted by it. Despite their disdain of the Rule of Law, it stands in their way, and they keep bumping into it, even though they do their best all the time to corrupt it.

This ironical state of affairs provides, of course, another convenient underlying, ongoing dialectic (Thesis, Antithesis) – ripe for exploitation: but in this particular case, the dialectic is a ‘given’, not an artificial construct. In other words, short of an actual criminal dictatorship, there’s not a lot they can do to alleviate their situation here other than to continue compromising, abusing and eroding the Rule of Law, through bribery and corruption.

We have established already that: the criminal governments themselves are engaged in the very racketeering criminality that we are having to expose, given not least that, as reviewed below, ALL SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. AND COMMON LAW – and are terrified that the endless exposures will lead to what, from their perspectives, might become truly intolerable ‘unintended consequences’, with rolling outcomes that they couldn’t control.

COWARDLY CONTROLLED NEWSPAPERS WHICH HAVE IGNORED CIMKM/CMKX
Because of this cowardice on the penetrated governments’ part, the newspapers listed below have been officially prevented, to our own certain updated knowledge [10th March], from reporting even the eminently reportable CMKM/CMKX case, in which payment of $3.87 trillion is demanded from the Securities and Exchange Commission and from certain of its current and former officials, given the unprecedented scandal of the S.E.C. having floated 2.25 trillion PHANTOM SHARES from a platform operated beneath the cover of the Securities and Exchange Commission itself (2).

• Note: Page B1 of the New York Edition of The New York Times dated 12th March carries the first ‘mainstream’ report of the CMKM/CMKX case, twisted to ignore the essence of the case and to suggest, contrary to the truth of the matter, that this is just another instance of the phenomenon that scamees can never admit that they have been scammed. Naturally, one did not expect such a newspaper to report the truth, which can be established from the Complaint [see our report dated 9th January (over two months prior to The New York Times’ article)]. No, the newspaper found a spurious, populist angle which has nothing to do with the substance of the Complaint against the S.E.C., indicating how nervous the US Establishment is over these developments.

Any ‘mainstream’ newspaper that was fulfilling its responsibilities objectively as a conscientious component of the Fourth Estate would have jumped on this story long ago. After all, we published the complete text of the Complaint within hours of it being filed [see our report dated 9th January 2010]. That was TWO MONTHS BACK: and so far, NONE of the ‘mainstream’ US/UK newspapers or broadcast outlets have touched this dynamite. SPECIFICALLY:

• Mr A. Clifton Hodges, Attorney for the 50,000+ CMKM/CMKX scammees, personally informed press contacts about the case, on the following media:

• The Los Angeles Times

• The Washington Post

• The Wall Street Journal

Mr Hodges received no response.

• The Editor of this service personally informed the prominent UK financial journalist Ambrose Evans-Pritchard on The Daily Telegraph, whom he has met in the past. Since The Daily Telegraph’s offices are within walking distance of our Central London office, the Editor offered to deliver a copy of the actual Summons and Complaint by hand last week.

• The Editor did not even receive the courtesy of an acknowledgment of his emails.

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH: A CONTROLLED OUTLET FOR MI-6
Notwithstanding his duplicitous behaviour in acting as an agent for MI-6 in bearing false witness against the Editor of this service in 2004, Gordon Thomas is persona grata at The Daily Telegraph, and recently published a large article in that paper on the subject of the use of British passports by Israel assassination operatives. As the Editor’s case shows, Thomas also acts as an agent for MI-6.

Therefore, The Daily Telegraph is under the thumb of MI-6, which helps to explain quite why this newspaper – which used to publish extensive op-ed. articles by the Editor of this service in the 1970s and early 1960s, until the takeover by the since disgraced and jailed corrupt globalist felon Conrad Black – has failed so far in its duty as a key member of the Fourth Estate to report (a) the biggest official corruption case to come to Court in world history and (b) the biggest and most-far-reaching exposure of government and financial institution racketeering since the world began.

MI-6 ‘INTEND TO TAKE MR CHRISTOPHER STORY OUT’
At about 10.45pm on Sunday 7th March, the Editor was informed via a transatlantic phone call that the Editor’s correspondent had been informed by an ‘inside’ source directly connected with MI-9 (MI-6) that ‘MI-6 intend to ‘take Mr Story out’’. Apparently the intention was or is to prepare one or more ‘stings’ and traps, in the hope that the Editor will fall into them, as happened once or twice before (given that, since these people only ‘do’ deception, it is almost impossible to avoid being deceived at some stage: except that the longer they drag out their cynical games, the easier it becomes to read their criminal minds and the unchanging techniques they use (the devil isn’t a great inventor)): so the deeper the discernment one eventually acquires, and the less chance do they have of pulling off a targeted dirty trick, as intended.

The Editor enquired why this evil intent should have surfaced at this late stage in the racketeering exposure proceedings: to which the answer was: ‘They want to move on by fixing things below the radar, they are furious that you have so much information, and they want to make sure you don’t publicise the outcome, especially concerning the Dollar Refunding which they have resisted so hard, when it happens’. To which the Editor responded words to the following effect: ‘Well, a gentleman’s word is his bond. They can walk across the bridge and ring our office doorbell’.

‘They wouldn’t do that. They’d sting you instead’.

Quite right: they can’t do that now, as they have squandered so many resources trying to entrap and trip the Editor up, that a ‘gentlemanly approach’ wouldn’t work now. It would probably have worked back in 2002: but not now. If you have been deceived and abused already by your own (let alone the hideous, criminalised American) intelligence services, you aren’t likely to succumb to such a ‘gentlemanly approach’. They burned their boats.

• Not very clever: but then again, as we’ve seen, these people are extraordinarily STUPID.

BRITISH INTELLIGENCE APPEARS TO BE BEHAVING TREACHEROUSLY, AS USUAL
Anyway, thanks for the heads-up – reiterated, by the way, by the faux-demented DVD ‘Black’ Psy-Ops voice who’s being paid to plague us daily since the completion of the Leo Wanta ‘switch’ in February 2008 (as revisited briefly above). So, what we have is the following devilish equation:

(1): The Editor of this service is a patriotic supporter of the nation state, is exactly what he says he is and has been for decades [see our testimonials], is viscerally opposed to the pagan, decadent, debauched World Revolution and its filthy ‘Black’ social and geopolitical detritus which is such a menace to civilisation, is a loyal subject of Her Majesty the Queen (with no other such connections whatsoever), believes (whether you like it or not) that Jesus Christ is the Lord, and is come in the flesh, and has stood up forcefully (because we have no choice, not because of any courage) to the abominations, abuses, verbal abuse and agitprop tirades, betrayals, successive threats (including seven death threats), innumerable lies and attempted ‘stings’, and the cynical exploitation by Mr Wanta of the Editor’s integrity and expertise; and has nevertheless sought to expose elements of the officially perpetrated and condoned racketeering and embezzlement of US taxpayers’ funds, and the myriad other Fraudulent Finance atrocities perpetrated with impunity under five self-acknowledged criminal Presidents of the United States.

(2): In exchange for which, conniving British intelligence cadres, according to the US ‘insider’ source whose identity is known to the Editor, are actively seeking ‘as we speak’ to ‘take Story out’ and to try, once again – à la Gordon Thomas – to discredit him.

This is to be the Editor’s reward for the serial abuse, deceit, lies, attempted ‘stings’, deceptions and other pathetic, underhand travesties, that the Editor has suffered in recent years in exposing these crimes. And these abuses, by the way, are AS NOTHING compared to what others, especially Michael C. Cottrell, have suffered at the hands of these serial thieves, racketeers and reprobate operatives over a much longer period of time.

• The Editor personally sent emails last week giving details of the CMKM/CMKX case to 14 well-known newspapers in India, Pakistan, China, Hong Kong, Malaysia and The Philippines, with the coordinates of Mr Hodges so that their journalists could check everything with the source. At the time of this posting, there had been no response.

‘MAINSTREAM’ NEWSPAPERS REVEALING THEMSELVES
TO BE CO-CONSPIRATORS IN COVERING UP THE RACKETEERING
None of this surprises us, given the above, nor does it even suggest that the Dark Forces are not in the process of being defeated. On the contrary, by cow-towing to their criminalised governments and intelligence communities, these newspapers are just allowing themselves to be tarred with the same Black Racketeering Brush that has covered the known official and financial criminalists with sticky black gunge that runs down into the sewer.

All that these media outlets are doing by ignoring these investigations is to confirm that they, too, are parties to, minded to be in favour of, and doubtless in many cases participants in, the familiar Fraudulent Finance racketeering practices that the perpetrators are trying in vain to cover up. In some US cases (known to this service), key media outlets are recipients of giant bribes paid out specifically in order to prevent them from covering these investigations.

We haven’t yet revealed the identities of the US news media concerned; but if there exists such a phenomenon as an honest journalist working for any of them, we would remind such persons of the basic reality that the bribee is actually in a stronger position than the distributor of the bribe – who won’t want to be exposed.

His bribe is presumably held in place by threats of lethal consequences, or blackmail: but these implied or actual threats are usually empty and cannot be fulfilled without entangling the source of the bribe in a cauldron of problems arising from his iniquity that he would wish to avoid.

WHY CONFINING EXPOSURES TO THIS WEBSITE HAS BEEN
COUNTERPRODUCTIVE FROM THE RACKETEERS’ PERSPECTIVE
And by adopting the strategy of trying to confine these exposures of official and financial sector racketeering to this website (even though some indications of broader coverage, with which we are associated, are ‘in the pipeline’), the US cover-up cadres have managed (counterproductively, from their disoriented perspective) to contrive that a reasonably consistent corpus of information has emerged into the public domain, as well as being captured for posterity and current research in successive issues of International Currency Review, which has official, central bank, institutional and library subscribers throughout the world – thereby precluding any possibility of the heirs of the perpetrators rewriting history so as to ‘airbrush’ this financial racketeering out of the record.

OUR EXPOSURE MODUS OPERANDI: ‘WALKING IN A STRAIGHT LINE’
Proceeding now to our modus operandi, we reiterate that our method is the straightforward one of ‘walking in a straight line’. Unlike your agents of influence and disinformation outlets – including notorious website peddlers of ‘Black Propaganda’, lies and confusion operating under Intelligence Power instructions to maximise the potential of the ‘Black’ fog of disinformation for the purpose of covering up the racketeering – our method, having done our due diligence to the extent possible, is to publish what we have learned either directly or else covered by a necessary ‘to the best of our knowledge and belief’ caution.

When we obtain information which can only be forthcoming from ‘inside’ and, very often, from dissident and double-crossed intelligence sources (because these people are always bitterly at loggerheads internally), we may publish such information ‘straight’ with no qualifications at all.

An example of this was our revelation that the late former Governor of the Bank of England, Lord ‘Eddie’ George, had been arrested and briefly jailed in July 2007. We have only recently learned, and publicised, WHY Lord George was arrested.

Lord George was seized because of his rôle in aiding, abetting and facilitating, with the criminal operative Dr Alan Greenspan, the stealing/diversion of The Queen’s gold on 29th-30th March 2007, as we reported six weeks or so later. Lord George, who died in April 2009, was instrumental in exchanging the gold for worthless pieces of ‘derivatives’ paper.

QUEEN’S GOLD THEFT STILL NOT RECTIFIED:
SO, KICK THE U.S. AMBASSADOR OUT OF LONDON
That operation represented the Bush-CIA-DVD’s biggest theft ever; AND IT STILL HASN’T BEEN RECTIFIED. If UK Governments consisted of people with conviction, knowledge and backbone, instead of the usual blackmailed, compromised and controlled psychological cases with dirty intelligence backgrounds, the American Ambassador should be ordered out of Britain, with his Embassy peremptorily closed sine die – until such time as this unspeakable assault has been resolved. When we mentioned this demand, which we first made in the summer of 2007, to a US contact, she said: ‘That’s precisely what the pan-Germans and the covert Soviets want’.

• To which our response is: SO WHAT?

If Lord George had even contemplated instructing his solicitors to try to obtain a retraction from us, he would immediately have been told advised nothing could be done because Christopher Story’s information was accurate (even though it was obtained from secret sources), and that Lord George couldn’t know what back-up information Mr Story held in support of his revelations.

In any case, to challenge such a report would certainly have embroiled the former Governor of the Bank of England in a dangerous encounter. Far better to assume that the sensational report would remain ‘buried’ in International Currency Review, and also covered by the Gordon Thomas MI-6 ‘blanket false witness’ lies about the Editor to the gullible so-called ‘mainstream’ media.

STEALING OF $4.2 TRILLION TAX MONEY ON 31ST DECEMBER 2009
STILL NOT RECTIFIED: SO MASSIVE CRIMES HAVE BEEN COMMITTED
Likewise, when we reported that the tax on the Settlements monies had indeed been subtracted effective 31st December 2009, we had obtained hard information to that effect, backing up ‘inside’ information provided via impeccably reliable sources. Specifically, we received an email at 20:24 UK time, on 1st January 2010, from a key figure involved in the Settlements (said by key US ‘inside’ sources, who may have been lying to our contacts, to be briefed to pay off corrupt US politicians) who was in almost daily contact with us by email under a pseudonym for over two and a half years, stating that: ‘sources here [in Dallas] and in Europe told me my taxes were taken off the top on or before 12/31 in order for them to be credited into Fiscal 2009. I got that word Wednesday 12/30/09’.

Since these taxes have not been restored to the Settlements funds which had not been paid out by the 45-day deadline of 14th February (by which date the funds from which the taxes had been taken should by law have been remitted):

• WHERE IS THAT TAX MONEY?

• WAS IT STOLEN AND IF SO, WHO STOLE IT, MR GEITHNER?

• WAS IT PLACED OUT ON CONTRACT, after $100 billion had been siphoned off into the hands of a well-known US false religion as we have reported, and if so, who is or was the foreign corrupt counterparty? Brazil? Zimbabwe? Denmark? Deutsche Bank, Frankfurt?

China Trust Bank? Barclays Bank?

• WHO are the foreign counterparties that have collaborated with the criminals in the White House, the US Treasury, the State Department and the CIA to STEAL over $4.0 trillion from the account of the US taxpayer, and imagine that there will be no ‘consequences’?

Of course, the problem that the official racketeers faced was that the tax accruals ‘could not be placed into the taxpayers’ accounts’ – because, suddenly, the $4.5 trillions squandered by the current reckless Obama Government would have been restored overnight – raising questions about SOURCE OF FUNDS. Ah, so THAT’s why there’s been a blackout across the board of these exposures and investigations, is it? Well, no: as will be shown, it’s much worse than that.

• They couldn’t pay the tax monies into the taxpayers’ accounts: so they just STOLE IT, which was what they always intended to do, anyway.

• Keep asking yourself basic questions like: WOULD THEY STEAL IT? THE ANSWER TO SUCH BASIC QUESTIONS CONCERNING THESE DESPERATE CRIMINALS IS: SURE. NATURLICH.

As can be seen from Mr Hodges’ letter to the Office of the New York State Attorney General [see our report dated 2nd March 2010], we know [and in any case, see above] that these tax monies were not ‘replaced’ back into the Settlements pool – as a consequence of which the perpetrators now face extremely severe criminal sanctions, as Mr Hodges has pointed out to Andrew Cuomo’s office when demanding an investigation, given that some of the main perpetrators, and many of his own client CMKM/CMKX victims (whose monies appear to be tied up with the Settlements funds) are resident in the State of New York [See Note 3].

How is it possible that this grievous official criminality and blatant racketeering has continued, notwithstanding these exposures (albeit in the context of the complicit and cowardly failure of the Fourth Estate to do its job properly)?

FISH ROTS FROM THE STINKING HEAD: WORLD COURT IMMUNITY DEMANDED
AND SCANDALOUSLY OBTAINED BY THE COLLECTIVE OF CORRUPT U.S. PRESIDENTS
The starting point here will be to remind you that FISH ROTS FROM THE HEAD and that we have reported that in or around September 2009, five US Presidents – Carter (39), Bush Senior (41), Clinton (42), Bush Junior (43) and Obama (44) DEMANDED IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION from the World Court. This immunity was, we were told, GRANTED – in a disgraceful abuse of power by the World Court, which appears to have caved in to Mr Obama’s DEMAND on behalf of himself and his four criminal predecessors.

As we can see from this episode, President Obama has been in lock-step with these four criminal predecessors – which eliminates all residual (courtesy) expectations that he might have had the guts to stand up to these racketeers. That would, however, have been impossible – since this operative, whatever his background, is of course a placeman and a puppet of the controlling criminalised US Intelligence Power.

We can thus state without fear of contradiction on the basis of the foregoing information that the five US Presidents openly acknowledge that THEY ARE CRIMINALS. If you are not a criminal, you do not need immunity from prosecution. These operatives, working together as a PRESIDENTIAL COLLECTIVE, demanded and received the immunity from prosecution that they sought.

That of course means that the World Court which sustains the figleaf of legality at the corrupted intergovernmental level (where in fact the Rule of Law does not operate properly or at all, or can be non-existent) is COMPLICIT IN LETTING ALL THESE CRIMINALS OFF THE HOOK – in other words, condones criminality at the highest level, irrespective of the consequences (which in this context includes destroying the lives, savings, hopes and physical assets of hundreds of thousands and probably millions of victims).

In translation, the World Court appears to regard its job as DEFENDING RACKETEERS IN HIGH PLACES – not to sustain the Rule of Law at the intergovernmental level without fear or favour.

GORBACHEV MANIPULATING DEVELOPMENTS FROM HIS WING IN THE KREMLIN. AS BEFORE
Behind this scandal of scandals, lies the deeper reality which we have publicised but which none of the ‘mainstream’ media has picked up on, and which, we are informed, is now of ‘no interest’ to the present generation. We refer to the PROVEN FACT that former President Mikhail Gorbachëv, who fronted ‘collapsible Communism’ for the benefit of the confused ‘mainstream media’ and strutted the stage for years thereafter (and indeed continues to do so, to this day), collaborated AND STILL COLLABORATES with the Black Godfather of the criminally penetrated US Intelligence Power, the Langley base of which is labelled the George Bush Center for Intelligence.

GORBACHEV, BUSH, KOHL, ACKERMANN: RACKETEERING PARTNERS IN DEUTSCHE AG.
Specifically, as we have exclusively reported, Gorbachëv is a partner with George H. W. Bush Sr. and Dr Helmut Kohl, the former Chancellor of Germany, together with Dr Joseph Ackermann, in Deutsche AG., formerly Barrington Investment Group, St. Gallen, Switzerland, which handles the illegal proceeds of racketeering operations – as was the case with the proceeds derived from the stealing of a contract belonging to Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., and which was facilitated by the ‘electronic stealing and forging’ of Mr Cottrell’s signature. The background detail to these crimes is re-presented herewith:

• Former President Mikhail S. Gorbachev, working with former US President George H. W. Bush Sr., former German Chancellor Dr Helmut Kohl and Dr Joseph Ackermann, all partners in Deutsche AG (formerly Barrington Investment Group), Switzerland, stole a contract using the electronic tag to the securities account owned by Mr Michael C. Cottrell’s Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., with Benchmark Securities, Inc., New Jersey, at a table-top meeting in Geneva on 7th October 2002 by the means described below, which included the electronic ‘forging’ of Mr Cottrell’s signature.

This theft was preceded by seven related thefts from Mr Cottrell’s firm’s securities account.

• This means that former President Mikhail Gorbachev and former German Chancellor Helmut Kohl are financial criminals like George H. B. Bush Sr., and should be treated accordingly.

Mr Gorbachev and Helmut Kohl have, as partners in Deutsche AG, by definition been profiting from the theft of Mr Cottrell’s contract and property, and also from huge proceeds from the theft of The Queen’s gold, which, we were specifically informed at 1.15 am by telephone on 4th February 2010, have likewise been channelled through Deutsche AG, St Gallen, Switzerland.

• As of 10th March 2010, The Queen’s gold had not been restored.

• The proceeds of innumerable corrupt transactions involving Gorbachëv, Bush Sr., Kohl and Ackermann have been run through the DVD’s main institutions, Deutsche Bank and Dresdner Bank.
So what is being exposed is that George H. W. Bush Sr. (CIA/DVD) and Mikhail Gorbachev (Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) and KGB/FSB) have been systematically ransacking American and non-American victims alike, and running this colossal open-ended racketeering through Germany, with the assistance of the former STASI of East Germany (who are GESTAPO in relabelled clothing).

Hence the presence on the scene of STASI operatives such as Eva Teleki, a (separate) ‘Swedish’ opera singer, and other dirty operatives suspected of being continuing STASI agents, such as Chancellor Angela Merkel (the former Secretary of the Agitation and Propaganda Department of the Young Communists at Marx Lenin University, in East Berlin). This explains why Merkel was earlier fingered by this service as the guardian in Germany of George H W Bush Sr.’s stolen and exploited racketeering assets with German institutions.

• Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin (Shalomov), who is a senior Soviet GRU operative, was based in East Germany before he migrated to Leningrad, and is believed to have been primarily responsible for orchestrating, at least from the Soviet side, the clockwork ‘collapsible Communism’ operations in Eastern Europe. Gorbachev has been reported to us to operate from a wing of the Kremlin, as though he never left the place.

• Which he didn’t. He’s been at the centre of this revolutionary criminality THROUGHOUT.

WANTA: THE COURIER BETWEEN BUSH SENIOR AND GORBACHEV
Reconsider now the unsavoury, treacherous rôle of Mr Leo/Lee Wanta in this context. As we have repeatedly shown [see our reports dated 20th September 2009, 22nd October 2009, 17th November 2009 and 29th January 2010 for instance], Wanta’s ‘Principality of Snake Hill’ cover, which provides him with a fraudulent virtual ‘Ambassadorship’ from the non-existent ‘Principality of Snake Hill’ to the United States ‘enabling’ him to continue using the false self-designation ‘Ambassador’, is the clumsy concoction of an undischarged felon who has stolen inter alia this Editor’s $35,000 loan plus interest and other monies, cannot own a bank account because he is a felon, and not only answers the telephone in German with ‘GUTEN TAG’, but spells telephone TELEFON, Groupe with an ‘e’ as in French, while also masquerading behind this false front using a 202 telephone number provided by the French Embassy in Washington, DC.

Thus AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc, with ‘Groupe’ spelt as in French, was a French/DVD operation set up with the assistance of the former French Ambassador to Washington, DC, Monsieur Levitte, now President Sarkozy’s top intelligence advisor – its purpose being to steal/divert funds on behalf of the Bush-CIA-DVD racketeers for which the bilateral treaty-bound Vichy-French authorities, being complicit with the pan-Germans in this corruption (think of the 3,000+ Bush-linked accounts with Paribas in Paris), provide permanent cover.

No wonder Wanta, who had operated out of Vienna in the late 1980s and early 1990s, had to sack Michael Cottrell as Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. (which he did ‘illegally’ on 23rd March 2008: see website reports) when it became obvious that Cottrell and Story were hot on the trail of this devious foreign operation to steal vast funds belonging to the United States of America and its taxpayers. Against this background, please be reminded [see our report dated the 20th September 2009] that Wanta’s nauseating ‘excess patriotism’ and ‘apple-pie Americanism’ is ALL FAKE – part of his elaborate but now exposed cover, as is his false religiosity. Recall Story’s Third Law: ‘Sooner or later all operations and covers are BLOWN’.

WANTA’S ‘REAGAN’S JUNK-YARD DOG’ DIVERSION
Wanta told Claire Sterling, the late author of Thieves’ World [published by the CIA’s favourite book publisher, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1994], and also reconfirmed personally to the Editor of this service, that President Reagan used to refer to Wanta as his ‘junkyard dog’.

He told the Editor that George Bush Sr. was ‘never in the room when Ronald Reagan briefed me’. This statement conflicts with the reality, which has been emphatically reconfirmed to this Editor from ‘inside’ sources, that Wanta was indeed the courier between George Bush Senior and Mikhail Gorbachëv (who are, as indicated, joint partners with Dr Helmut Kohl and Dr Joseph Ackermann in Barrington Investment Group, now Deutsche AG, St Gallen, Switzerland: see above etc.).

So it transpires that Wanta systematically lies and lied to his contacts, including the Editor of this service, whose platform and expertise he exploited to provide a smokescreen behind which the Bush-CIA-DVD racketeers, which Wanta served, could continue unimpeded under the crook Henry M. Paulson’s supervision from the US Treasury.

• We did wonder why we encountered no interference from the highest US level for the first year while Wanta was using us in the manner described.

WANTA KNEW ABOUT 9/11 IN ADVANCE, LIKE VREELAND
Wanta was released from jail just over a week after 9/11, was collected from prison by Gerald Salchert, of Austrian extraction, and taken to a relative’s house in Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin. Because of his experiences at the hands of the Bush-Clinton Crime Syndicate (given that these mentally deranged capos always treat their underlings with cruelty), there was concern that his prior knowledge of the 9/11 abomination might be leaked prior to the event – which is in fact what the Office of Naval Intelligence and prospective/actual assassin, Lt. Mark Delmart Vreeland, did from jail in Toronto, after he had opened three diplomatic bags, which is treason.

In March 2005, the Pentagon-associated US operative nicknamed ‘The Visitor’, calling himself Walker whose real name is Demchuk, who pestered the Editor for information about the Soviet-originated Iraqi WMD-removal (‘Sarindar’) programme, informed the Editor that ‘Vreeland is in solitary confinement for a very long time, his case has been sealed and he is no longer a threat to you’ (Vreeland having threatened the Editor with death in 2003). Vreeland’s parole board meeting has been pencilled in for a date in 2163, according to an informed US source.

FRANCE COVERS FOR GERMANY UNDER TREATY OF THE ELYSEE
Under the Treaty of the Elysée dated January 1963, which is of indefinite duration, France and Germany are both required to coordinate their stances on all external matters, on which they are required to ‘reach an analogous position’. France is therefore indistinguishable from Germany in respect of international strategic deception operations (especially as there are special intelligence collaboration provisions under the Treaty), and accordingly fronts extensively for Germany.

In this particular context, it provides flimsy (and disintegrating, or disintegrated) cover for the Abwehr operative, Leo Wanta, who was indeed the courier between George H. W. Bush Sr. and Mikhail Gorbachev [see our report dated 4th February 2010]. Although he says he’s Polish, we think this felon and fraudster may be a DVD operative/double agent, possibly STASI.

The German Chancellor, Angela Merkel – formerly the Secretary of the Agitation and Propaganda Department of the Communist Yugend at Marx-Lenin University, East Berlin – is a STASI operative.

FRAUDULENT WANTA ‘SNAKE HILL’ WEBSITE’S GERMAN CONNECTIONS
Further research has revealed a direct German connection with the clumsy ‘Principality of Snake Hill’ deception, which we have demolished, not least with the imprimatur of Ms Brenda Farrell, an official at the Australian Embassy in Dublin, who replied to our Irish associate’s enquiry as follows:

Forwarded message
From: <richardsharpe@eircom.net>
Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:25 PM
Subject: Fwd: Principality of Snake Hill [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
To: mrrichardsharpe <mrrichardsharpe@gmail.com>

richardsharpe@eircom.net wrote:
Many thanks for your timely response.

Regards
Richard

“Austremb Dublin” <Austremb.Dublin@dfat.gov.au> wrote:

Dear Mr Sharpe,

Thank you for your email.

There is no principality in Australia.

Kind regards

Australian Embassy
Dublin
Tel: +353 (0) 1 664 5300
Fax: +353 (0) 1 678 5185

richardsharpe@eircom.net

The German connection exposed herewith below, reveals the low calibre of these operatives, whose arrogance and certainty that they will never be exposed, is such that they don’t put much expertise into their deception operations if they can help it. A sane person would have thought that in ‘designing’ the ‘Principality of Snake Hill’ deception, they would have used some common sense and established an actual domain name, rather than using freeware sites.

One of the ‘Snake Hill’ websites
[http://members.multimania.co.uk/snakehill/]
causes computers to display a warning [viewable at: http://safeweb.norton.com/report/show?url=multimania.co.uk].

That warning is really for the entire ‘Multimania.co.uk’ domain, not just the fake ‘/snakehill’ subset. But it is interesting, to put it mildly, to note that the website’s location is: GERMANY. Why would a GERMAN site use a United Kingdom domain identifier?

• ESPECIALLY on a site noted for hosting THOUSANDS of Trojan threats: except that the answer presents itself immediately: it’s a DVD operation.

Yes, the entire website is HOSTED IN GERMANY, so Wanta’s ‘/snakehill’ subdirectory on this domain absolutely emanates from GERMANY as well. The following is the actual Whois Internet registration data (fully available at http://who.is/whois/multimania.co.uk/):

IP: 213.131.252.254
IP Location: Dusseldorf*, Germany

*Note: Wanta’s lawyer, Steve Goodwin, was born in Dusseldorf.

Domain name: multimania.co.uk

Registrant: conversis GmbH

Registrant type: Unknown

Registrant’s address: Patrick Kirchhoff, Erftstrasse 11, Duisburg 47051, Germany

Registrar: InterNetWire Communications GmbH [Tag = INTERNETWIRE-DE]
URL: http://www.internetwire.de

Relevant dates: Registered on: 12-Feb-2009
Renewal date: 12-Feb-2011
Last updated: 23-Apr-2009

Registration status: Registered until renewal date.

Name servers: ns1.conversis.de; ns2.conversis.de

WHOIS lookup made at 02:44:25 27-Feb-2010

As you can now start to see, our original assessment that the United States and Britain are in thrall to the GERMAN enemy that they never defeated, which we have maintained without deviation ever since those ‘gasps’ emitted by eavesdroppers during a telephone call several years ago made by the Editor to Wanta (joined by his former lawyer, Thomas Henry or Heinrich, a.k.a. Mr ‘Nasty’) is being confirmed by more and more evidence that is accumulating all the time.

In addition to using the French as a convenient, permanent front for their continuing hegemony operations, the pan-German Nazi long-range strategic deception heirs of the Abwehr, Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD), collaborate with the covert Soviets (Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU), and the KGB/FSB, in formulating, implementing and consolidating their comprehensive, failing revolutionary hegemony operations against the Main Enemy (Britain and the United States).

• That’s quite easy, since the heirs of the Abwehr and of Heinrich Himmler OWN THE CIA.

CIA/DVD PRACTICE OF EXPLOITING AND STEALING OUTSIDE EXPERTISE
Now it is standard CIA ‘tradecraft’ practice to usurp the expertise of outside professional talent if it is not available in-house or by some other means. In this context, the CIA perpetrators needed a US securities expert with impeccable credentials and a securities account. What the CIA does is apply its standard Bush-style ‘bait and switch’ technique, exploiting and maximising the potential of the usurped professional expertise, before rejecting it and stealing the assets associated with it.

Note that Wanta likewise used this Editor’s website and publishing platform in pursuing his own agendas for 15 months, telling Mr Cottrell in October 2007 that ‘we must get rid of Chris Story, but don’t tell him’. Mr Cottrell having formed his own view of Wanta’s unreliability, Teutonic arrogance and duplicity, carefully found a way to warn the Editor of this ‘switch’ in December 2007, without actually revealing what he could not then reveal.

In March 2008, Wanta fired Cottrell by issuing a vituperative three-page ‘Resolution of the Sole Shareholder’ (which is illegal, as corporate resolutions can only legally be issued by the Board at a Board Meeting: the text of this document used language familiar to the Editor of this service as having been written by Thomas Henry (‘Mr Nasty’)).

Relieved, Mr Cottrell then despatched the necessary resignation information to the tax authorities in Richmond, VA, requesting them to send all subsequent paperwork, including tax demands, to Wanta in Wisconsin – where he had long stated that he is not resident and does not run a business. The rest of this sequence can be gleaned from our website: see March 2008.

So what the cynical Intelligence Power routinely does is ‘borrow’ external expertise, before discarding or stealing it. In the Editor’s case, ‘bait and switch’ has worked both ways: it could be argued that we ourselves have done a ‘switch’, taking a leaf out of these deceivers’ book.

Meanwhile, the same happened to Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. Because the standard CIA procedure of exploiting, then stealing and discarding outside expertise and assets, also explains Wanta’s ‘use’ of Mr Cottrell for his failed AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. DVD stealing operation – because Michael C. Cottrell has the requisite securities market expertise and securities account facilities, which were (mistakenly) applied for the benefit of Mr Wanta’s AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. (but which cannot be used without Mr Cottrell’s signature: so we shall see whether it has again been stolen).

[Note: This analysis was written BEFORE the incredible fraud perpetrated via the State of Pennsylvania, subject of our separate report, was known. Quite prophetic, you may think].

Note also that Steven Goodwin, the Wanta Attorney in Richmond, VA, who accepted this Editor’s $35,000, which Wanta stole, was born, as stated previously, in Dusseldorf. Goodwin wrote the shifty loan documents which Leo Wanta demanded that the Editor sign forthwith, as soon as the Editor arrived on 10th June 2005 at his relative’s address in Chippewa Falls.

Wanta took it for granted that the Editor would meet his preremptory demand to sign, and wouldn’t walk out on the spot (which he nearly did).

[INSERTION: The Editor received an email on 9th March from a US correspondent who said he had asked Mr Wanta why he hadn’t paid the Editor’s loan plus interest back on the due date (or at all). Wanta replied that Mr Story had been ‘offered’ the choice of a ‘Biblical’ payment of ten times the orginal loan (no such ‘Biblical norm exists, by the way), or payment of the amount due on the due date. This is a fabrication. No such choice was ever offered: in any case it contains what is known as an ‘illusory promise’: see the securitisation analysis below. Another Wanta fabrication/slither].

THE AMERICAN INTELLIGENCE POWER WHICH HAS USURPED
THE GOVERNMENT DANCES TO THE TUNE OF FOREIGN POWERS
As for the stealing of Mr Cottrell’s contract and the electronic forging of his signature – a specific case of which we have detailed information [see above], which proves the ongoing racketeering collaboration between Bush, Gorbachëv and Kohl from the outset – it has been shown not only that Gorbachëv, Bush Sr., Helmut Kohl and Ackermann are handling stolen accruals (4) (the money that you make from stealing my money, is my money), but also that the US Intelligence Power dances to the tune of the foreign power whom George H. W. Bush represents, namely Germany – whom the Allies were supposed to have defeated in 1945.

Working closely at the intelligence level with the Nazi Continuum is the covert Soviet Continuum – both of which ‘Black’ Revolutionary Forces went underground: the Nazi (pan-German) Continuum went underground well before the defeat of Hitler, and the Soviet Continuum went underground in 1991, remaining under the supervision of ‘former’ President Gorbachëv, who, as indicated above, occupies a large suite of offices inside the Kremlin to this day.

As the Editor of Soviet Analyst, this Editor believes that GORBACHEV calls the shots – as he did from the moment this former Secretary of the CPSU Administrative Department came to power after the ‘festival of three funerals’ of abruptly deceased (murdered) Soviet leaders, in 1985.

We also believe that the concerted offensive to ‘take down’ the ‘Main Enemy’ (Britain and the United States) is the TWIN operation following on from the ‘takedown’ of the Soviet Union – and furthermore, that this massive operation is perpetrated by THE SAME TOP THREE OPERATIVES who ransacked the USSR: Gorbachëv, Bush Senior and Helmut Kohl.

WORLD REVOLUTION RACKETEERING OFFENSIVE
In other words, what we are exposing is a colossal World Revolution programme, from which these three racketeers and handlers of stolen monies have benefited and continue to benefit personally. [Well, they can’t be expected to run the World Revolution for altruistic motives, can they].

The extent to which Metabridge (Mossad, DVD, CIA and MI-6) is implicated in this gigantic anti-nation state World Revolution operation will quite probably be exposed when it transpires whether or not the two high-level MI-6 officers in the United States who were reported to us to be holding The Queen’s signature authority for the Settlements and her hijacked loan funds, may be double-crossing the Monarch. Given that everyone appears to have been double-crossing everyone else, anything is possible and nothing can be taken for granted: the Pennsylvania episode lends support to our suspicions on this score.

The Allies defeated Herr Adolf Schickelgrüber (Hitler), NOT Germany. On the contrary, assisted by the absorption by and penetration of the CIA by multiple ‘rehabilitated’ Nazis thanks to that ‘reverse takeover’ masterminded in the 1940s with treacherous US State Department connivance inter alia by General Reinhard Gehlen – the thuggish Abwehr Nazi intelligence chief who had overseen the repression in the German-occupied areas of the Soviet Union – the CIA became the main ‘active’ component of the Nazi Continuum. This accounts for its hideous Himmlerian abominations over the years, its satanic experimentation operations, its ‘Black’ offensives against the American people and the Rest of the World, its Nazi-type military aggressiveness and its repulsive arrogance, its absolute disdain of and hatred for the Rule of Law, and the reality that it is much more dangerous nowadays than the KGB-GRU ever was.

So what we are actually confronting is indeed the Nazi Continuum, secretly supported as always by (covert) Soviet Communism – the US component of which, at the present time, is headed by Leon Panetta. This Director of Central Intelligence, who controls the White House, was reported to the Editor of this service to be STILL blocking the Settlements as of 5th March 2010.

But even as we were being told this, something interesting happened behind the scenes. Which brings us to the real nub of the matter.

‘WALKING IN A STRAIGHT LINE’ WILL EXPOSE THE DECEPTIONS
The struggle that has been raging behind these scenes within and close to the DC Beltway reflects:

• A corrupt and criminal official determination to frustrate the Bank for International Settlements’ instructions (‘Line Item’) designating the conduct of the necessary and overdue G-7-approved on-balance sheet, fully taxable and transparent PRIVATE SECTOR Refunding of the US Dollar to Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., who, we were informed by US ‘inside’ sources (who will be exposed if this turns out to be false) is regarded by personnel working for The Queen as the only expert who can be trusted with this task.

• If none of this is true, the preceding report, containing a letter from Mr A. Clifton Hodges to the Editor of this service for onward delivery (which was implemented) to Buckingham Palace, was intended to expose the deception and those engaged perpetrating it (whose names we know, if they are so engaged, and who will be exposed along with the other deceivers, should a deception have been perpetrated. In accordance with our policy of ‘walking in a straight line’, we continue to assume that this is not the case: but we shall see).

• What certainly IS known is that the foregoing background has been used – in a similar manner as the Leo Wanta cover involving this Editor was exploited – to provide ‘smokescreen’ cover for an operation which might (in this context) supposedly enable the criminal perpetrators to conduct the Dollar Refunding themselves, for their own illicit profit, using FRNs, not US Treasury dollars.

In other words, the perpetrators have remained hell-bent on blocking the will of the international financial community as expressed via the BIS refunding ‘Line-Item’ instructions, given their horror at the prospect of losing control – and have illegally frustrated the intended use of the $6.2 trillion loan funds provided on 19th-20th July 2007 via the Bank of England under levy to six US money center banks, via the Bank of New York Mellon (as it became, effective July 2007).

COTTRELL THREATENS TO SNATCH AWAY THE RACKETEERS’ COVER,
THROWING THEM INTO A MAD PANIC. THIS WAS NOT ANTICIPATED.
On Friday 5th March, in telephone conversations, including one with the Editor of this service, attended by every despicable intelligence eavesdropper under the sun, Michael Cottrell stated unequivocally that if the $6.2 trillion refunding loan, as pre-agreed, is withheld from Mr Cottrell’s firm, Pennsylvania Investments Inc., he will walk away.

This statement evidently caused panic and a hurried strategic deception rethink inside the Beltway and in the other dark corners of the US criminal universe in question – more or less proving that, as with the Wanta operation which exploited both Mr Cottrell’s securities market expertise and this Editor’s publishing and publicity abilities and qualifications, the perpetrators had been using Mr Cottrell as cover for an intended deviation from the agreed-upon Basel instructions.

• The pending Pennsylvania Fraud exposure will PROVE THAT THIS ASSESSMENT IS CORRECT.

• The intention is for the proceeds of racketeering operations to be channelled inter alia into the hands of the partners of Deutsche AG, St Gallen, Switzerland.

And as indicated above, we know precisely who is behind this typical piece of CIA/DVD duplicity: and if it continues, they will be exposed by name. But, as always happens with these investigations, THIS OPERATION HAS ALREADY BEEN BLOWN. And it has been ‘blown’ because, whereas we have been walking ‘in a straight line’, the snakes are incapable of doing anything but slithering.

THE TWO MI-6 OPERATIVES WITH THE QUEEN’S SIGNATURE:
ARE THEY WORKING FOR, OR ARE THEY DOUBLE-CROSSING THE QUEEN?
It now has to be stated that if the two MI-6 operatives said to be carrying The Queen’s signature authority are or have been double-crossing Her Majesty, we will get to the bottom of that, as well, and will expose them, also. After all, we were able to expose the false assertion by the US ‘inside’ sources that Roy Grantham is a Representative of The Queen, when we asked Grantham to get in touch with us via this website. Although Grantham lives just a couple of miles from the Editor’s office, he saw fit to instruct a firm of ‘heavies’, based in Shreveport, LA, to issue a blatant threat by email against the Editor of this service.

• This ‘investigator’ said that Grantham would not be contacting the Editor of this service in view of his interest in preserving his ‘Stellar’ [note the geomasonic language] reputation.

Beyond this, it now has to be said that if the British Monarchical Power does not INSIST upon the agreed-upon Group of Seven-approved, private sector-based transparent, taxed Dollar Refunding operation proceeding precisely as specified by Basel, and is prepared to put up valuable assets in exchange for worthless Federal Reserve Notes, the Monarchy will self-destruct – WHICH IT IS THE OBJECTIVE OF THE PAN-GERMAN ENEMY TO PROCURE, since the British Monarchy stands in the way of the comprehensive realisation of Germany’s insidious and now collapsing ‘Europe from the Atlantic to the Urals/Vladivostok’ hegemony plans.

WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THE CHINESE CURRENCY BOXES?
The same applies to the Chinese. What happened to the Chinese currency boxes which were made available SPECIFICALLY to provide backing for the Treasury dollar? Are the Chinese also stupidly risking their assets in exchange for worthless FRNs, as well – notwithstanding their knowledge that the US officials in charge are racketeers, and in spite of the still undischarged lien for $47 trillion against the US Treasury imposed on or about 6th December 2009?

GREEK DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER EQUATES NAZI GERMANY
WITH CHANCELLOR MERKEL’S STASI GERMANY
It is certainly true that the catastrophic (and soon to become even more catastrophic) European project is on the verge of self-destruction, too. In late February 2010, in an interview with the BBC, the Greek Deputy Prime Minister accused NAZI GERMANY – clearly eliding Nazi Germany with the current German STASI régime – of ‘taking away the gold that was in the Bank of Greece, and they never gave it back. They shouldn’t complain so much about stealing and not being very specific about [their] economic dealings’.

• In other words; WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT, FRAU MERKEL?

• The fact that Greece and Germany have since been in discussions, does NOT expunge the Greek Deputy Prime Minister’s pointed observation from the record.

As previously reviewed, Greece’s massive toxic debt was accumulated under the preceding Greek Government as a consequence of Fraudulent Finance and racketeering operations with associates of the Bush/CIA/DVD Crime Syndicate via Citibank Athens, as we originally revealed a long time ago.
Far from being the weak partner, therefore, Greece is in fact in a position to DESTROY the entire poisonous pan-German hegemony operation, and in our opinion may well wind up doing so – as will similar situations waiting to explode among the PIGS (VIZ. Portugal, Italy (Greece) and Spain, which ought to read PIIGS, since Ireland is in the same position. A country with a huge trade surplus and a colossal current account deficit is in SERIOUS TROUBLE.

Uncoincidentally, each of these countries, as well as Iceland and the corrupted United Kingdom itself, has provided Fraudulent Finance ‘counterparty racketeering services’ to elements and associates of the Bush-CIA/DVD Crime Syndicate – with accruals doubtless pouring into Deutsche AG, St Gallen, for the benefit of Bush Senior, Gorbachëv (Orbach), Kohl and Ackermann.

WHAT DO THE FOUR RACKETEERS HAVE IN COMMON
WITH OTHER WELL-KNOWN DECEASED AND LIVING OPERATIVES?
What do these four racketeers have in common with the following deceased and living revolutionary operatives?

Andropov, Yuri (Lieberman)
Barroso, José Manuel
Biden, Joseph
Brown, Gordon
Bush Jr., George W.
Bush Sr., George H. W.
Clinton, Hillary Rodomski
Clinton, William Jefferson (Rockefeller)
Dodd, Senator Christopher
Emanuel, Rahm
Farage, Nigel
Geithner, Timothy
Grossart, Sir Angus
Khrushchev, Nikita (Perlmutter)
Medvedev (Menakhem Aaronovich Mendel)
Panetta, Leon
Paulson, Henry M.
Putin, Vladimir Vladimirovich (Shalomov)
Salmond, Alex
Sarkozy, Nicolas
Schickelgrüber, Adolf (Hitler)
Stalin, Josef (Djiugashvili-Kochba)?

FORECLOSURE ANALYSIS’ PARA-LEGAL SERVICES SPRINGING UP IN THE UNITED STATES
We turn now to the central issue: that securitisation is illegal under US law and indeed in all Common Law jurisdictions. There are NO REDEEMING FEATURES.

Services are now springing up in the United States providing a ‘Foreclosure Autopsy’ assessment in which breaks in the chain of title, missing assignments, unlawful substitution of trustees and blatant fraud and forgery, is typically identified. Such services do not provide actual legal advice: what they do is offer recorded information in support of any planned evidentiary hearing or legal discovery going all the way back to the original creditor/depositor. Every recorded document can be identified and surfaced for distressed homeowners – representing a broad foreclosure analysis resource support system via reliable established networks, local title companies, county recorders and other parties, especially in non-judicial foreclosure states like California, Arizona and Nevada, which appear to be states in the greatest need – given that it has been predicted that some 3.4 million foreclosures are anticipated across the United States over the rest of this calendar year (see Note 5 below for more background to this ‘utter corruption’).

NORTHERN ROCK’S LIES TO A FORMER MORTGAGOR MASKING
THE FACT THAT HER TITLE DEEDS WERE ‘OTHERWISE ENGAGED’
In Britain, we have been engaged with a householder who paid off her mortgage with Northern Rock in June 2004. In exchange, Northern Rock informed the lady that they would be forwarding her Title (Lease) documents, but failed to do so for five years – proffering every excuse under the sun for their gross failure, including the statement that her title documents had been ‘dematerialised’ – before, all of a sudden, forwarding her missing documents under cover of a letter saying that ‘it has come to our notice that we did not return your Title Documents in June 2004. Here they are. Please keep them in a safe place’.

• This occurred in June 2009, after the householder had torn her hair out, metaphorically speaking, for five long years trying to extract her documents from this reprobate lender.

In this instance, it is likely that, given that Northern Rock had had to be taken over by the British Government (since Gordon Brown was terrified at the media coverage of long lines of customers outside Northern Rock branches seeking to retrieve their savings, as in Argentina), the British Government’s lawyers may well have instructed Northern Rock to disgorge the said householder’s documents, which may have been encumbered by incorporation within a securitisation package.

The lady accepted a ‘compensation’ payment of £150 brokered by the Financial Ombudsman (which seems to exist to protect recalcitrant financial institutions operating within the British jurisdiction from determined ladies like this householder who will not take prevarication for an answer), on the basis of blatantly fraudulent information (e.g. that her title documents had been ‘dematerialised’ – a false statement placed in writing by Northern Rock).

We have comprehensively deconstructed this Northern Rock case, with facsimiles of the relevant correspondence, in the forthcoming huge issue of International Currency Review (6), indicating that Northern Rock lied to the householder, who was accordingly subjected to five years of anxiety and was unable to exercise her right to move home at any time during those five years.

• UPDATE: The householder wrote many days ago to Northern Rock asking them to answer her question, YES or NO: were her Title Deeds assigned and incorporated in a securitisation package without her permission? As of this date [11th March], THERE HAS BEEN NO RESPONSE. This is because they can’t answer the question without re-incriminating themselves. They have lied in writing already, so they have a major problem: as does the British Government, as the bank is controlled by the Government. We’ll see where the serpents in question slither and writhe to.

• MORTGAGE DECEPTION IN SPAIN: This morning [11th March], we received an email from a UK correspondent who writes: ‘I have a house in Spain, with a mortgage attached to it from Banco do Valencia’. Three years ago, the lady in question sought specific answers to her questions about prospective changes to the conditions of the mortgage. The bank failed to respond at all.

Moreover even after she complained to the bank’s Head Offfice, enclosing all the correspondence, there was no reply. Some time later the bank branch manager admitted to the lady that the changes that she requested could not be implemented BECAUSE THE MORTGAGE HAD BEEN ‘SOLD’ ON TO ANOTHER COMPANY. But of course the Spanish bank refused to provide any details of the company in question, let alone guidance on how they could be contacted. This revealed that, as in the cited Northern Rock case, Banco do Valencia are hiding something.

Our correspondent states: ‘So I pay my monthly mortgage to Banco do Valencia without having a clue who really owns that debt or who I am ultimately paying. This chimes with your Northern Rock exposure. Keep up the good work’.

• Two points: (1): NEVER DO BUSINESS IN SPAIN. They will always deceive and double-cross you. And: (2): The fact that Britain and Spain are satrap states caught in the European Union Collective entrapment net MAKES NO DIFFERENCE. Sheisters are sheisters, no matter what the regime.

• AND A VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE PROFESSIONAL UK CORRESPONDENT ADDS [11th March]:
‘From my own experience of finance companies’ ‘lawlessness’, they never back down even when shown that their actions are illegal or contracts unenforceable; and the standard ploy is not to answer letters… In psychological terms, this shows that they are extremely afraid, beneath the superficial impression of arrogance that they display. Their power, therefore, is an illusion’.

• Editor’s add-on: With the Northern Rock test case, we can assure you that there will be no let-up as they have been caught lying to the former mortgagor IN WRITING and there’s not a lot they can do to retrieve their situation. No doubt the Government’s lawyers will be forced to intervene.

SECURITISATION IS A KEY ELEMENT OF A REVOLUTIONARY ATTACK ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
When you consider that, as will now be rehearsed, securitisation is completely illegal under US and Common Law, you can see not only that these criminal enterprise financial institutions are well and truly on the wrack, but also WHY there has been such intense and ruthless ongoing RESISTANCE to the exposure of this rampant dirty racketeering activity – which represents nothing less than an intentional, sustained and suitably ‘below the radar’ offensive by the manipulators of the World Revolution against private property – being micromanaged in parallel with the so-called ‘sexual revolution’ and ‘upside down’ outpouring of every form of reprobate behaviour and perverted sex which is aimed at destroying the family, regarded by these long-range geomasonic maniacs as the glue which ‘legitimises’ private property.

Even if a jaded observer has zero knowledge of the progress of the World Revolution, which has reached an advanced (and yet fragile) stage in our era, the relentlessly comprehensive spread and coverage of the racketeering and corruption being perpetrated against private home owners can easily be seen to be ‘no accident’. As with ALL dimensions of the World Revolution, one has to ask oneself: how come that this nefarious, barbaric behaviour appeared suddenly and on such a truly colossal scale in every corner of the world almost simultaneously? None of this is coincidental: people who treat such developments as ‘phenomena’ without enquiring WHY these things are happening, are destined to languish in permanent ignorance of the truth.

YES, A RUTHLESS, SYSTEMATIC ATTACK ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
And the truth IS that what we are exposing is nothing less than a carefully planned, ruthless, determined and systematic revolutionary attack on private property.

• No wonder Gorbachëv sits, to this day, in a huge wing of the Kremlin, as before.

HE COLLABORATED WITH BUSH SENIOR to unleash this scourge on homeowners in the United States, Britain and the White Commonwealth countries – the ‘Main Enemy’, in collaboration with the covert Soviets’ intelligence allies, German ‘Black’ intelligence (DVD, DACHAU), hiding behind the front conveniently provided by the duplicitous French under the Treaty of the Elysée.

The criminal mentality seeks at all costs to entangle its targets in its own corruption, so that if anything goes wrong, the targeted parties are readily identifiable as racketeers, thereby providing the originating perpetrators with cover (so they imagine).

Hence the subversion through corruption of foreign counterparties – in Britain, Iceland, Greece, Italy, the Vatican, Spain, Portugal, Albania, North Korea, India, China, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Cyprus and wherever willing trading counterparties may be found.

LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR SCAMS STILL ‘OUT THERE’
That such Fraudulent Finance operations have continued as though there had been no historical discontinuity is of course well known. But a good deal of ‘scraping of the barrel’ is also taking place. Last year we drew attention to certain curious money-lending activities that were being fronted or sponsored by Newsmax.com which we were advised may be borderline financial scams.

The lowest racketeering common denominator we have ever come across, dated 2nd March 2010, from Cyprus – signed off by one Mr Ahmet Z. Altunis, ‘Principal Right Holder. World Wide Funding Trust’ seeks clients inter alia in the United States, to take advantage of their services for all ‘your unconventional funding needs’:

‘We give big opportunity to enter trade (PPP). If your assets SKRs (Safe-Keeping Receipts), Notes, Lease MTNS, Bond(s), IBOS, CMOS, have no available credit line now, we open credit line to your name. You can enter (PPP), your big profit [to] finance your project. We begin New Year contracts 2010: Enter Gateway to unlimited opportunities…. Send LOI + CIS + SKR + Passport. Then we open and activate credit line under YOUR NAME, even [though] the credit line is open on our name… Client have NO RISKS at 100%, all is secured by our and their lawyers, no tricks’.

When this crude solicitation written in barbaric English was sent to us from the United States, we were told that it represents a lowest common denominator fraud serving the Bush Crime Syndicate network. In due course, the client is asked for an up-front fee of between 12,800 and 15,000 Euros to cover ‘due diligence costs’, so it looks like a standard ‘Nigerian-type’ scam: but it isn’t.

Targets are being enticed into securitisation deals, which are illegal as indicated below, under US and Common Law. The solicitation sent to us (above) was being widely disseminated within the United States by US parties (wire fraud).

WHY SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. AND COMMON LAW
Securitisation is illegal under US legislation – primarily because it is fraudulent and causes specific violations of R.I.C.O., usury, Antitrust and bankruptcy laws. And it flies in the face of public policy in numerous ways, as is expounded in extensive detail in an analysis to be published in our journal Economic Intelligence Review 2009Q1 (7) with several pages of book, article and case references.

To begin with, securitisation violates US State usury legislation. Secondly, all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ as well as ‘assignment’ securitisations are essentially tax evasion schemes, and the penalties for tax evasion in the United States are excessively severe.

Thirdly, in all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations, the conflict of interest inherent in the sponsor also serving as the servicer constitutes fraud and conversion. In the fourth place, in all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations where the Special Purpose Vehicle [SPV] is a trust, the declaration of trust is void, as it exists for an illegal purpose.

In the fifth place, off-balance sheet treatment of asset-backed securities (both for ‘true-sale’ and for assignment transactions) constitutes fraud.

Sixth, all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations involve blatant fraudulent conveyances. In the seventh place, securitisation usurps United States bankruptcy laws and is accordingly illegal, as well as being also demonstrably contrary to public policy.

SECURITISATION ENTAILS GROSS VIOLATIONS OF R.I.C.O. STATUTES
In ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations, there are fraudulent transactions which serve as ‘predicate acts’ under US Federal R.I.C.O. statutes.

The specific R.I.C.O. sections are: Section 1341 (mail fraud); Section 1343 (wire fraud); Section 1344 (financial institution fraud); Section 1957 (engaging in monetary transactions improperly derived from specified unlawful activity) [‘the money you make from the illegal exploitation of my money, is my money’]; and Section 1952 (racketeering).

Furthermore, securitisation constitutes violations of American antitrust statutes through market integration, syndicate collusion, price formation, vertical foreclosure, tying, price-fixing, predatory pricing, and the rigging of allocations.

Securitisation also involves void contracts, given the lack of consideration, illusory promises, the absence of any actual bargain, the absence of mutuality – and finally illegal subject matter and the contravention of public policy.

Securitisation is riddled with Fraudulent Transfer, Fraud in the Inducement, Fraud in Fact by Deceit, Theft by Deception (Fraudulent Concealment) and Fraudulent Conveyance: see the US securities regulations routinely breached in such activity, listed at the foot of this report and of most of these reports for THE PAST THREE YEARS, and other laws also routinely flouted in this context.

NOTWITHSTANDING THAT IT’S ILLEGAL, U.S. AUTHORITIES
CONTINUE TO PROMOTE AND ENCOURAGE SECURITISATION
Yet notwithstanding such crystal-clear indications that securitisation is 100% ILLEGAL under US Law, as well as under Common Law generally (so that these findings are largely applicable in all Common Law countries), US authorities from the highest level downwards, financial institutions, intermediaries, Intelligence Power operatives and others are gearing up for what they doubtless hope will be intensified racketeering and trading activity with (corrupt) foreign counterparties.

This behaviour is being fine-tuned ‘as we speak’, despite the reality that the securitisation activity being planned and implemented violates innumerable US statutes in the manner we summarise above, and notwithstanding that such activity is contrary to public policy.

Indeed, it’s as though the Rule of Law did not exist. From the highest level of the US Treasury, the White House, the US State Department and the Central Intelligence Agency and its subsidiaries such as the lethal Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), the mindset, intention and perverse primary objective has all along been to resume Fraudulent Finance based on securitisation, as quickly and as seamlessly as possible. No wonder the five criminal Presidents DEMANDED immunity from prosecution from the World Court: did they arrange for key Justices (starting with the American Justice) at the World Court to receive pecuniary reward for granting them their demand?

SUMMARY FORENSIC ANALYSIS PROVING THE ILLEGALITY OF SECURITISATION
From whichever angle securitisation is considered, it is ILLEGAL. For example, the contracts are themselves VOID. This is because the process of securitisation involves several contracts that are either signed simultaneously, or within a short timeframe – many of which are rendered void inter alia because there is no consideration in contracts used in effecting the securitisations.

Many such contracts involve unilateral executory undertakings containing illusory promises. A unilateral executory promise is not a consideration. Such promises typically include a promise made by the Special Purpose Vehicle to pay out periodic interest, whether contingent or non-contingent on whether the collateral pays cash interest.

Collateral-substitution agreements contain a promise whereby the sponsor agrees to substitute impaired collateral. An assignment agreement of future (not yet existing) collateral may well be deemed a unilateral executory promise by the sponsor.

Illusory promises are not valid consideration for a contract. Such promises may be found in the Subscription/Purchase Agreement, whereby an existing asset is being exchanged for a future asset that does not exist as of the date of the subscription/purchase agreement. To make matters worse, none of the agreements typically signed by the investor as part of his/her purchase of the Special Purpose Vehicle’s Asset-Backed Securities expressly incorporates the (typically illusory) promises embodied in the offering prospectus.

OR: The Special Purpose Vehicle’s promise to pay interest and/or dividends on Asset-Backed Securities ‘Interest-Onlys’, Preferreds and ‘Pincipal-Onlys’ are essentially illusory promises because the underlying collateral may not produce any cash flows at all: so there won’t be any interest/dividend payments.

Moreover the lack of mutuality characterising such contracts renders them null and void, by definition. In any such contract, each party must have firm control of the subject matter of the contract and the underlying assets (consideration), and there MUST be a direct contractual relationship between the parties concerned.

But this is not the case, especially as the Special Purpose Vehicle’s corporate documents (trust indentures or bylaws or articles of incorporation) may typically limit the right of each Asset-Back Security investor; while there is typically no mutuality at all between the Special Purpose Vehicle and the sponsor/originator, because both entities are essentially the same, and are controlled by the sponsor before and after the securitisation takes place.

SECURITISATION: A COVER FOR TAX EVASION
In addition to their multiple violations of American State usury laws, all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment securitisations’ are essentially tax evasion arrangements. In the United States, the applicable tax evasion statute is the US Internal Revenue Code Section 7201 7 which reads: “Any person who willfully attempts in any manner to evade or defeat any tax imposed by this title or the payment thereof shall, in addition to other penalties provided by law, be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $100,000 ($500,000 in the case of a corporation), or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution”.

Under this statute and related case law, prosecutors must prove three elements beyond any reasonable doubt:

(1): The actus reus (the guilty conduct) – which consists of an affirmative act (not merely an omission or failure to act) that constitutes evasion or an attempt to evade either: (a) the assessment of a tax or (b) the payment of a tax.

(2): The mens rea or “mental” element of willfulness – the specific intent to violate an actually known legal duty. In the case of ‘true sale’ transactions, the tax evasion occurs because:

(a): The sponsor determines the price at which the collateral is transferred to the SPV, and hence, can arbitrarily lower/increase the price to avoid capital gains taxes – it being assumed here that the sponsor is a profit-maximising entity and will always act to minimise its tax liability and to avoid any tax assessment;

(b): The sponsor typically retains a ‘residual’ interest in the SPV in the form of IOs, POs and “junior piece”, which are typically taxed differently and on a different tax-basis compared with the original collateral: hence, the sponsor can lower the price of the collateral upon transfer to the SPV, and convert what would have been capital gains, into a non-taxable basis in the SPV “residual”;

(c): There is typically the requisite “intent” by the sponsor – evidenced by the arrangement of the transaction and the transfer of assets to the Special Purpose Vehicle;

(d): Before securitisation, collateral is typically reported in the sponsors’ financial statements at book value (that is, lower-of-cost-or-market: under both the US and the international accounting standards, loans and accounts receivable are typically not re-valued to market-value unless there has been some major impairment in value) which does not reflect true Market Values, and results in effective tax evasion on transfer of the collateral to the SPV, as any unrealised gain is not taxed;

(e): The actus reus is manifested by the execution of the securitisation transaction and transfer of assets to the SPV;

(f): The mens rea or specific intent is manifested by the elaborate arrangements implicit in securitisation transactions, the method of determination of the price of the collateral to be transferred to the SPV, the aims of securitisation, and the sponsor’s transfer of assets to the SPV;

(g): The unpaid tax liability consists of foregone tax on the capital gains from the collateral (the transaction is structured to avoid recognition of capital gains), and tax on any income from the collateral which is ‘converted’ into basis or other non-taxable forms;

(h): Income (from the collateral) that would have been taxable in the sponsor’s own financial statements, is converted into non-taxable basis in the form of the SPV’s Interest-Only (IO) and Principal-Only (PO) securities: part of the Interest-Spread (the difference between the SPV’s income and what it pays as interest and operating costs) is paid out to PO-holders, and this transforms interest into return-of-capital or just capital repayment, with no tax consequences. [Leaving aside the Ponzi scam dimension here – Ed.].

In cases of ‘disguised loan’ or ‘assignment’ securitisation transactions, tax evasion occurs:
(a): Because the sponsor determines the price at which the collateral is transferred to the SPV, and hence can lower/increase the price of the collateral to avoid capital gains taxes;

(b): Because the sponsor typically retains a ‘residual’ interest in the SPV which is normally taxed differently and on a different tax-basis compared to the original collateral: hence, the sponsor can lower the price upon transfer to the SPV, and convert what would have been capital gains, into non-taxable basis for tax purposes;

(c): Because the transfer of collateral to the SPV and the creation of Interest-Only and Principal-Only securities converts what would have been taxable capital gains into non-taxable basis;

(d): Because gain in the value of the collateral is not recognised for tax purposes, because there has not been any ‘sale’;

(e): Where the ABS is partly amortising, any capital gains are converted into interest payments;

(f): Because actus reus is manifested by the execution of the securitisation transaction and transfer of assets to the SPV;

(g): Because the mens rea or specific intent is manifested by the elaborate arrangements implicit in securitisation transactions, the objectives of securitisation and the sponsor’s transfer of assets to the Special Purpose Vehicle;

(h): Because the unpaid tax liability consists of tax on the capital gains from the transfer of the collateral (the transaction is structured to avoid recognition of a sale, whereas the transfer to the Special Purpose Vehicle is effectively a sale), and tax on any income from the collateral which is ‘converted’ into basis or other non-taxable forms, by securitisation.

SECURITISATION VIOLATES THE U.S BANKRUPTCY CODE
AND THEREFORE ALSO CONTRAVENES PUBLIC POLICY
Any transfer or conveyance of the assets of a debtor that is deemed to be made for the purposes of hindering, delaying or defrauding actual or potential creditors, may be determined by Courts to be a Fraudulent Conveyance under Section 548 of the US Bankruptcy Code or under a relevant theory of Constructive Fraud.

Although each US State has its own laws regarding the appropriate elements of proof of Constructive Fraud, Section 548(a)(2) of the US Bankruptcy Code permits an inference of Constructive Fraud if the following factors exist:

(1): The debtor received less than reasonably equivalent value for the property transferred; and:

(2): The debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the transfer, or else retained unreasonably small capital after the transfer, or made the transfer with the intent or belief that it would incur debts beyond its ability to pay.

The following theories of Fraudulent Conveyance within the context of securitisation may apply:

• Where the sponsor/originator receives insufficient value for assets transferred.

• Where there is an ‘intent to hinder, delay or defraud’ creditors (representing an implicit pre-petition waiver of one’s right to file for bankruptcy), with regard to the originator’s transfer of assets to the SPV, or the originator’s transfer of assets to the SPV has clearly not been undertaken on an arms’-length basis.

• Where securitisation increases the originator’s bankruptcy risk; and:

• In all instances where securitisation usurps the United States’ bankruptcy laws and is therefore illegal on such a basis alone.

SECURITISATION VIOLATES FEDERAL R.I.C.O. STATUTES
Turning now to the reality that securitisation constitutes a violation of US Federal R.I.C.O. Statutes [see Legal Notes below], we can state without equivocation that the entire securitisation process constitutes violations of Federal R.I.C.O. statutes, because:

(1): There is the requisite criminal or civil ‘enterprise’ – consisting of the sponsor/issuer, the trustees and the intermediary bank. These three parties work closely together to effect the securitisation transaction.

(2): There are ‘predicate acts’ of:

(a): Mail fraud – using the mails for sending out materials among themselves and to investors.

(b): Wire fraud – using wires to engage in fraud by communicating with investors.

( c): Conversion – where there isn’t proper title to collateral.

(d): Deceit: misrepresentation of issues and facts pertaining to the securitisation transaction.

(e): Securities fraud: disclosure issues.

(f): It entails loss of profit opportunity.

(g): It involves the making of false statements and or misleading representations
about the value of the collateral.

(h): It entails stripping the originator/issuer of the ability to pay debt claims or judgment claims in bankruptcy court – a state of affairs that may apply where the sponsor is financially distressed and the cash proceeds of the transaction are significantly less than the value of the collateral.

There is also typically the requisite ‘intent’ by members of the enterprise – evident in knowledge (actual and inferable), acts, omissions, purpose (actual and inferable) and results. Intent can be reasonably inferred from:

(a): The existence of a sponsor that seeks to raise capital – and cannot raise capital on better terms by other means;

(b): The participation of an investment bank that has very strong incentives to consummate the transaction on any agreeable (but not necessarily reasonable) terms.

SECURITISATION ALSO VIOLATES U.S. ANTITRUST LEGISLATION
Securitisation further constitutes violations of US Antitrust laws, because the American Asset-Backed Securities and Mortgage-Backed Securities markets are dominated by relatively few large entities such as FNMA (Fannie Mae), Freddie Mac, the top five investment banks (all of which have conduit programs), and the top five credit card issuers (MBNA, AMEX, Citigroup, etc.), etc.. As a consequence, the top five ABS/MBS issuers control more than 50% of the US ABS/MBS market. This constitutes illegal market concentration under US Antitrust legislation.

THE ‘PHILIPPINES EXCEPTION’ BURIED IN THE CLAYTON ACT
In the Antitrust context, however, observe the following text from the Clayton Act, which specifically EXCLUDES transactions undertaken with The Philippines. Isn’t that interesting?

It provides a blanket rationale for the massive past and ongoing US clandestine focus on The Philippines, the CIA’s need for ‘black hole’ conditions there in connection with successive US operations to relieve Presidents Marcos and Aquino of the stolen and hidden ‘Yamashita’s gold’, the US Fraudulent Finance operations using Philippine institutions and related operations based in that territory, an aborted US operation to convert The Philippines into a new US State (as had been planned under Clinton for Somalia), and the frequent visits of operatives known to ourselves to The Philippines under cover of attending to ‘orphanages’:

§ 1 Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 12 Definitions; short title:
(a) “Antitrust laws”, as used herein, includes the Act entitled:
‘An Act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies’, approved July second, eighteen hundred and ninety; sections seventy-three to seventy-seven, inclusive, of an Act entitled ‘An Act to reduce taxation, to provide revenue for the Government, and for other purposes’, of August 27th, eighteen hundred and ninety-four; an Act entitled ‘An Act to amend sections seventy-three and seventy-six of the Act of August twenty-seventh, eighteen hundred and ninetyfour’, entitled ‘An Act to reduce taxation, to provide revenue for the Government, and for other purposes’, approved February twelfth, nineteen hundred and thirteen; and also this Act.

‘Commerce’, as used herein, means trade or commerce among the several States and with foreign nations, or between the District of Columbia or any Territory of the United States and any State, Territory, or foreign nation, or between any insular possessions or other places that are under the jurisdiction of the United States, or between any such possession or place and any US State or Territory of the United States or the District of Columbia or any foreign nation, or within the District of Columbia or any Territory or any insular possession or other place under the jurisdiction of the United States:

Provided, That nothing in this Act contained shall apply to the Philippine Islands. The word ‘person’ or ‘persons’ wherever used in this Act shall be deemed to include corporations and associations existing under or authorized by the laws of either the United States, the laws of any of the Territories, the laws of any State, or the laws of any foreign country.

FANNIE MAE, FREDDIE MAC ENGAGED IN FURTHER ILLEGAL SECURITISATION:
RE-SECURITISING ALREADY SECURITISED ‘DUD’ ASSETS TO DUMP BACK ON THE BANKS
Even so, it became apparent in early March that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, both controlled by the US Government, are preparing to force financial enterprises such as the CIA’s Bank of America Corporation, JP Morgan Chase & Co, Wells Fargo and Citigroup, Inc., to buy back further waves of newly securitised packages of mortgages – i.e., the former Government-Sponsored Enterprises are reportedly engaged again in repackaging mortgage securities already marked down to ‘true’ value.

In other words, they are trying to dump faulty securitised loans, as well as straight loans, back on the participating banks – under cover of such fantasies as the double-minded statement attributed to Sharon McHale, spokes‘person’ for Freddie Mac, located adjacent to the CIA in McLean, Virginia, on 5th March 2010: ‘We are trying to be good stewards of taxpayer dollars and as part of that, it’s important that those dollars not go to loans that should not have been sold to us in the first place’ – throwing the blame for Freddie Mac’s own scandalous racketeering behaviour back at the banks.

• Being interpreted, what this woman was saying was: this:

‘We are covering ourselves with a mantle of rectitude by posing as protectors of the taxpayer’s dollars in order to obfuscate our own ongoing racketeering behaviour, even as we prepare further Fraudulent Finance securitisations in violation of the relevant US legislation: and we couldn’t care less because we are owned by the Government itself, which is up to its neck in such violations’.

And Paul Miller, a former examiner for the Federal Reserve (hardly a guarantee of integrity, given the Fed’s own reputation for Fraudulent Finance), based in Arlington, VA, let the cat out of the bag with: ‘If you want to originate mortgages and keep that pipeline running, you have to deal with the push-backs. It doesn’t matter how much you hate Fannie and Freddie’ – and neither, apparently, does it matter to what extent the Rule of Law is cynically violated ‘in order to keep the pipeline (of Fraudulent Finance) running’.

GARY GENSLER IS NOT AS OPPOSED TO FRAUDULENT FINANCE AS HE SEEMS
The appointment of Gary Gensler as Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission under President Obama was greeted with signs of relief on Wall Street. Here was a hardened former Goldman Sachs trader with 18 years’ experience with that cynical, ruthless money shop, who could be relied upon to act at all times in the interests of Wall Street, not the investor and taxpayer.

But, as has since been reported elsewhere, over a private lunch at the Waldorf Astoria in midtown Manhattan on 6th January 2010, the 52-year-old Gary Gensler caused indigestion among the self-satisfied guests at the luncheon – Timothy O’Hara, head of global credit at Crédit Suisse Holdings USA, Inc.; Robert P. Kelly, CEO at Bank of New York Mellon Corporation; David B. Heller, co-head of the securities division at Goldman Sachs; and Seth Waugh, CEO of Deutsche Bank Americas.

Because when one banker asked Gensler what or whom he saw as the biggest obstacles to reform in the securities and commodities sectors, he replied: ‘You’ (8).

Mr Gensler has been seeking derivatives control legislation that goes beyond current proposals, including what President Obama put forward during the summer of 2009. Notwithstanding the fact that if the derivatives situation is not addressed, the forthcoming crash will be so horrific as to be likely to tip the world into open, rather than covert, warfare, a certain Samuel Hayes, Professor Emeritus of Investment Banking at Harvard Business School, Boston, told Bloomberg in February 2010 that ‘Gensler is going to raise real concerns’ for financial firms.

‘Derivatives are absolutely central to what is Wall Street in the 21st century’ – namely, a casino. ‘Nobody wants the regulations to affect them’ (9).

‘GREATER TRANSPARENCY’ IS EVIDENTLY ALL HE‘S AFTER
On closer examination, Mr Gensler has actually been pushing for ‘more transparency’ in the over-the-counter derivatives market, so as to lower spreads between buyers and sellers and to make it easier for new competitors to enter the market – which the big banks aren’t keen on, as more participants will deprive them of profit.

So, Gary Gensler is not actually in the business of tackling the underlying crisis arising from the determination of financial institutions to continue playing Russian roulette, using the model first developed by the US Intelligence Power as it sought what it thought were foolproof methods of ensuring its financial independence from Congress and the open-ended funding pipelines that it considered appropriate to buttress its usurped status as a recalcitrant ‘State within the State’ impervious to reform and determined to brook no interference with its stolen hegemony.

INVESTORS’ MONEY USED TO REMUNERATE WALL STREET
In any case, the derivatives institutions and their back-up infrastructure have not the slightest intention of adopting any course other than ’business as usual‘ – and on a far larger scale than in the past. This obtuse madness WILL lead to a global collapse, as derivatives products are usually without real value. As a noted article in The New York Times of 7th February 2010 at last stated, investment banks trading derivatives do not own the mortgage bonds, the obligations from home owners, notes signed by home owners or the mortgage deeds of the deeds of trust.

The ‘structured products’, consisting of bundled documents ostensibly relating to the above but having NO RECOURSE to underlying real value, were, however, invested with ‘value’ arising from the name of the institution marketing the ‘asset’ – that is to say, arbitrary ‘value’ arising from the fact that, as a Goldman Sachs compliance officer actually admitted to the Editor of this service: ‘A structured product is worth what someone is prepared to pay for it’ – a penetrating statement which encapsulates the possibility that it may be (is) worthless: which is indeed the case.

‘THE MONEY YOU MAKE BY MISUSING MY MONEY IS MY MONEY’ – I.E., THE HOME OWNER’S
The money sloshing around between investment banks in this dirty market was investors’ money unwittingly advanced into pools of capital which winds up being used primarily to finance the fees, profits, insurance proceeds, insurance premia, and so forth – all for the benefit of Wall Street, paid to the investment banks, and not to investors who stumped up the money in the first place.

These fees and relationships are not and have never been disclosed to the home owner despite, in the United States, clear legislation requiring such transparency, including the Truth in Lending Act, and Deceptive Lending – which require full transparency and disclosure.

• Further legislation applicable to the securities sector in the United States is re-listed below – in the list that we have republished at the foot of our website reports for the past three years.

• The list of applicable securities regulations and laws is augmented by a legal tutorial which, again, we have published for the past three years at the foot of these reports,

It would appear that, notwithstanding such reminders, Wall Street and its compliant infrastructure, as well as its co-conspiring portfolio of dubious foreign trading counterparty institutions, has every intention of continuing to violate the relevant US rules and legislation – while at the same time continuing to abuse, in the mortgage sector, the home owner with the same cynicism as in the past.

Given the legal principle that ‘the money you make from misusing my money is my money’, it is quite clear that undisclosed fees, profits, kickbacks and other financial abuses perpetrated by these big speculative financial entities which produce no real wealth at all, but simply move money around between themselves, are payable to the home owner who signed the ‘loan’ papers in the first place.

A PERVERSE AND ARROGANT OFFICIAL INTENT TO CONTINUE VIOLATING U.S. LAW
But none of these realities – which have been rammed home by the technical work that we have published on this subject in International Currency Review, prepared by Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. – have had any impact so far on the thinking of derivatives sector participants, analysts and observers, who appear to be hell-bent on continuing to violate US legislation.

On the contrary, these people are concerned exclusively with ensuring that the discontinuity that enveloped their sector and the financial markets as a whole in mid-September 2008 – is reversed, even though a total resumption of derivatives trading at full throttle WILL lead the world, and all engaged in this fraudulent activity, into a black hole

Moreover, since cracks are appearing in the entire structure of sophisticated finance ‘as we speak’, centred on Greece – the previous Government of which incurred, through Fraudulent Finance operations using Citibank, Athens, as counterparty to Bush/Cheney trading activities, an immense portfolio of derivatives obligations estimated at 300 billion Euros off-balance sheet, which can never be honoured – the timing of the collapse need no longer be measured in years.

So the self-centred, myopic speculative institutions are behaving like gun-toting bandits in a department store – determined to have their own way, irrespective of the consequences: one of which is that in the event of default, colossal payouts are due on Credit Default Swap contracts, which in fact amounts to institutionalised blackmail.

THE DEPOSITORY TRUST & CLEARING CORPORATION IS IN OVERDRIVE
For its part, the main component of the derivatives infrastructure supporting this prospectively catastrophic speculative activity is the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) – best known for its Cede & Co. partnership nominee facility, which is the holder of almost every physical stock certificate in existence, and boasts of accounting for more than $2.0 quadrillion in (largely fake) securities transactions annually.

On 10th February 2010, the DTCC announced that the Federal Reserve Board had approved its application to establish a DTCC subsidiary which is to be a member of the Federal Reserve System to operate ‘the Trade Information Warehouse (Warehouse) for over-the-counter (OTC) credit derivatives and the ‘legally accepted’ global depository for over-the-counter credit derivatives transactions’. (10).

THE FEDERAL RESERVE HAS BECOME
THE BACK-STOP GUARANTOR OF CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS
Which means, in practice, that the Federal Reserve is now the GUARANTOR behind all Credit Default Swap (CDS) transactions that clear via DTCC. The new Fed-endorsed organisation will settle CDS obligations in all currencies and process credit events. It will also handle all over-the-counter credit derivatives traded worldwide, will be regulated by the Federal Reserve and the New York State Banking Department, as well as being ‘overseen’ by other American as well as international regulators (via a sort of college of supervisors).

The DTCC’s Trade Information Warehouse will be operated by a Warehouse Trust, beginning its operations ‘once certain organizational conditions have been met, which are expected shortly’. It is understood that the company will have been funded and will have started operations by March.

One observer, commenting on these arrangements, wrote to say: ‘To be sure, the net notional CDS amount, which is what counterparties would be on the hook for in the case of an orderly unwind of the financial system, is materially lower than the gross total. Yet, as systemic unwinds are never orderly, gross tends to become net – as for instance when Lehman bonds went from par to 10 cents in the space of 24 hours. Should systemic risk flare up again’ (think Greece – Ed.), ’and fiat-based market values quickly catch up with ‘fair values’ – which in our Ponzi economy can very easily be calculated: they are ALL ZERO – the Federal Reserve will be on the hook’, with the US taxpayer, for amounts so large that the volume of printed money will reduce the value of a dollar to one cent or less within the space of a few weeks (or less).

So basis spreads can be expected to be severely compressed, once counterparty risk has become a thing of the past and all systemic risk in the biggest derivatives marketplace (excluding interest rate swaps) is fully backstopped (in theory) by the Federal Reserve.

In addition, the DTCC will be guaranteed monopoly status with respect to Credit Default Swap trading, as no-one in this business will wish to transact or clear anywhere else.

• FACT: Monopolies are illegal under US, British and European law.

STAGE SET FOR AN UNIMAGINABLE (AVOIDABLE)
CATASTROPHE: A DEATH-WISH
So the stage is well and truly set for a catastrophe of unimaginable proportions, bearing in mind that under Geithner as President, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York alone accumulated a portfolio of derivatives ‘assets’ commonly cited at $500 trillion, but which is probably much larger. This of course makes a complete nonsense of the formal derivatives data published by the Bank for International Settlements, which excludes double-counting; but none of these numbers can be relied upon, although the Bank for International Settlements’ information possesses the cachet of authority and has to be used for want of better data (11).

The DTCC is also boasting of further innovations, including the expansion of its Global Corporate Actions (GCA) service based on feedback, sourcing scheduled payment announcements from the Federal Reserve Board for US structured and non-structured securities, specifically Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac securities, which are not DTC-eligible; scheduled payments coverage to include international securities that are not DTC-eligible; and distribution information on UK Unit Trusts.

THE DTCC’S OBLIGATIONS WAREHOUSE SERVICE
The January 2010 issue of DTCC News and Information for DTCC customers further discusses how the DTCC’s Obligations Warehouse, to be launched by mid-2010, will quote ‘provide transparency for the industry and regulators while delivering operational efficiencies, cost savings and risk mitigation to financial firms’. The new service will ‘close the chapter on the manual processing of ex-clearing trades by empowering ops. professionals with a real-time automated service that will electronically manage these transactions and communicate a match to each side of the obligation’.

‘The Obligation Warehouse service will also automate the management of non-Continuous Net Settlement (CNS) fails. ’Because these trades exist outside Continuous Net Settlement, the back office faces an accounting nightmare in handling these transactions – not to mention bearing the added costs for maintaining comprehensive records and dedicated personnel to keep track of their status. The Obligation Warehouse will help mitigate this risk by consolidating all ex-clearing and non-CNS fails in a central location and storing them until settlement’.

‘The Obligation Warehouse enhances transparency by fully capturing, for the first time ever, all trading activity in NSCC-eligible securities in a central location from trade date until settlement. As a result, ex-clearing trades will no longer be invisible to all but the direct parties to that particular transaction. Instead, the industry and regulators will have a complete view of all open obligations traded in the US marketplace for equities, corporates, municipals and also unit trust investment securities – and [will] have a central vantage point to monitor and mitigate systemic risk’ (12).

GREATER TRANSPARENCY WON’T ELIMINATE SYSTEMIC RISK,
OR PREVENT A CONFIDENCE CRISIS
But while being able to see systemic risk stresses emerging may be an advantage, it won’t, and cannot, eliminate systemic risk. This is because these trades are fraudulent given the fact that securitisation violates US law (and Common Law in English-speaking countries), while in most contexts anyway, they are bedevilled by a lack of real value and non-recourse characteristics.

As for Credit Default Swaps, whatever the contract provides and whenever the counterparties decide on the basis of the contract that a default has taken place or is about to take place, it is in the interests of the provider to allow the default to take place, given the huge payouts which ensue. In other words, the contract is based on latent blackmail. That alone makes it illegal.

SO, WHERE ARE YOU, MR HOLDER?
Much more seriously, as summarised above, securitisation contracts are ALL ILLEGAL under US and Common Law. Therefore, all US official and ‘private’ sector operations being framed so as to revalidate and rehabilitate securitisation represent a perverse assault on the Rule of Law, and the commission of multiple felonies – accordingly leaving ALL perpetrators, whether holders of public office under the United States or any other level of government or employed by wayard financial institutions, or developing the securitisation infrastructure, vulnerable to criminal investigation, indictment, arrest and prosecution for gross and knowing violations of the law.

Whether the scandalous immunity from prosecution awarded by the World Court on demand to the five self-acknowledged criminal US Presidents protects them from the appropriate legal sanctions, prosecution and punishment within the US jurisdiction itself, isn’t clear: but we doubt it. Ironically, therefore, since the five Presidents have, by demanding immunity from prosecution from the World Court, acknowledged their own criminality, it is open to the US authorities to investigate, indict and arrest these operatives – since they have acknowledged their guilt. Where are you, Mr Holder?

Your job is to administer justice without fear or favour, isn’t it?

APPENDIX:
LORD MYNERS SAYS THERE MUST BE PENALTIES FOR BANK EXCESSES
On 8th March 2010, the UK ‘City Minister’ (Financial Services Secretary), Lord Myners, who in our opinion has been far too laid-back in failing to condemn criminality in the corrupted City of London, said that financial markets must ‘punish’ those who ‘make mistakes’ [sic!]. Without a ‘downside’, it would be impossible to ‘restore’ market discipline.

In all likelihood, Lord Myners didn’t really understand what he was saying – which was that the market system wasn’t functioning properly. And the reason for that is summarised in our report above: securitisation impedes the proper operation of market forces via its opposition to public policy in the bankruptcy context, its antitrust characteristics, and in the other ways described in outline in the present report. Does Myners understand this?

All that Lord Myners actually said, at a meeting in London, was that bankers had been obscenely remunerated even though they had ‘made serious mistakes’ (unspoken), code for ‘behaved like organized criminals’ (even more unspoken): ‘A lot of people lost money in the financial sector over the last few years – bank shareholders in particular suffered massive losses’.

‘But many people have been protected. Creditors have been bailed out. Far too many bankers themselves have enjoyed massive awards during the crisis, even as their firms were rescued’.

Well, we knew all that. When he got down to detail, Myners told the meeting that the Government was determined to ensure that no bank was too complex to fail. ‘We’re serious about removing the safety net that has allowed those with blind faith in market efficiency to ignore the consequences of their lack of discipline’ [sic! Let the word ‘criminality’ NEVER BE MENTIONED].

‘We are also working with G-20 countries and the IMF to access the feasibility of an international levy or fee on financial institutions. This will make sure that any residual insurance that banks are perceived to enjoy after living wills are implemented, will not come for free’.

Lord Myners then redeemed his rather shallow observations by pointing out that the implicit support of the financial industry in the past had probably represented the most expensive public subsidy to any industry in any part of the British economy, ‘vastly exceeding’ that paid to agriculture or the defence industry.

‘There is no reason why the public, taxpayers, should continue to provide a free at the source of delivery subsidy to the cost of capital of the banking system. We need to do everything we can to shrink the subsidy to zero’.

Under the Brown Government’s new Financial Services Bill, consumers would be granted new powers to seek redress through the courts. However the weakness of Lord Myners’ presentation was his complete failure to indicate that he and the Government understand that a colossal volume of the transactions which gave rise to the crisis in the first place were and remain ILLEGAL.

It’s no use trying to reform the ‘framework’ when the transactions being promoted within the framework contravene antimonopoly legislation, bankruptcy legislation and all the other elements of the law identified in outline above. So, laudable though Lord Myners’ objectives appear to be, he is in fact wasting everyone’s time.

He appears not to understand that the transactions which precipitated the crisis were CRIMINAL TRANSACTIONS, and his failure to address the criminality issue – which is really the ONLY issue – indicates that the Government in London is trying to cover up and ignore the criminality: because of the vast tax accruals from the recalcitrant financial sector that the Government needs more than ever, given its colossal subsidies to the criminal financial enterprises whose casino operations have been exposed.

POSTSCRIPT:
STIGLITZ: ‘THE AMERICAN BANKING SYSTEM IS CORRUPT’
The headline above appeared in the British press on 10th March 2010. Eager with anticipation and almost salivering with excitement, your correspondent rushed to read the article in question. Here, at last, he thought, was a fully paid-up member of the Great and the Good coming to his senses and calling a spade a spade at last. Alas, for Nobel Prize-winning Dr Stiglitz, a spade is in fact a fork.

Professor Stiglitz, who teaches at New York’s Columbia University, said that the Federal Reserve System ‘smells bad’. The Editor invoked the smell of the Fed, and of course agreed. But on further reading, it transpired that Dr Stiglitz was merely complaining that the Presidents of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks are chosen by commercial bankers.

‘The regional Reserve Banks… have a key role in regulation and in the last crisis [i.e., once again, it’s ‘in the past’: Ed.] of bailing out the banks. But the heads of these organisations are chosen by a committee dominated by the big banks that are being bailed out… so the people bailing out are appointed by the people who they bailed out. It smells bad. It looks bad. It undermines confidence’.

OH DEAR. Is this the best Dr Stiglitz can do? The American banking system is corrupt because the heads of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks are chosen by the big banks? Is that really, Dr S., the reason that the system is corrupt? Have we not been exposing rampant racketeering by the same big banks alluded to? Oh sorry, we forgot. He’s a Nobel Prize-winning economist.

The holder of a Nobel Prize can only say what’s considered kosher by the globalist internationalists who use the Nobel Prize system to ‘EMBED’ the ‘PARTY LINE’ in the public’s psyche. So the ‘party line’, as we speak, is to ACKNOWLEDGE that, yes, the US banking system is indeed corrupt, as Mr Story has been reiterating as nauseam, but to attribute this to the way the heads of the regional Feds are chosen. [With the Federal Reserve Board, the number of Feds is a geomasonic 13].

Notes and references:

(1): As previously reported, the Editor visited the veteran author and journalist Gordon Thomas, at his suggestion, in Bath in the fourth quarter of 2004.

During that visit, Mr Thomas indicated that MI-6 had informed the British media that Christopher Story has been a participant in the abortive putsch in Equatorial Guinea, with which Mark Thatcher was associated. Since the Editor of this service has done nothing, literally, since 1963, except run his publishing and print production businesses, the Editor asked why such lies and false witness would be perpetrated – especially against someone such as the Editor of this service whose loyalty to the Crown and the United Kingdom cannot possibly be, and has never been, questioned.

He replied:

‘They think you may be dangerous because you control your own
publications and you have the documents’.

In divulging this, of course, Mr Thomas revealed that MI-6 itself had something to hide. If the Editor was dangerous ‘because you hold the documents’, the documents themselves clearly represented elements of something much bigger. So the consequence of this intervention was that the Editor naturally redoubled his private investigations to establish what MI-6 were so anxious to cover up.

When the Editor protested to Thomas that the lies disseminated to the media about him were rank fabrications, Gordon Thomas uttered the memorable response:

‘It doesn’t matter that it’s not true. What matters is that it’s out there’.

In the course of this meeting, Gordon Thomas made it quite clear to the Editor that he is an agent of influence and acts as an agent for MI-6. He said that his father had been an MI-6 officer.

Given Thomas’s statement ‘It doesn’t matter that it’s not true. What matters is that it’s out there’, everything that Gordon Thomas himself publishes must, by definition, be questioned – since he was quite content to go along with this twisted and nefarious mentality.

• You could say that by revealing this to the Editor, both Thomas and MI-6 exhibited a degree of abject stupidity which perhaps we haven’t emphasised sufficiently.

Furthermore, it became quite obvious that the purpose of this exercise was intimidation. Thomas accompanied his message with a veiled threat, as well. Clearly, these people are accustomed to targets caving in to such pressures, and they have no immediate backstop plans when the target fails to react in accordance with their evil intentions.

As a follow-up to this operation, Thomas badgered the Editor in New York to get in touch with an operative who later turned out to go by the nickname ‘The Visitor’, who used the name Walker as an alias, but who’s real (Ukrainian) name is Demchuk. This operative was said to have Pentagon links. At fist the Editor refused, but Gordon Thomas (as agent for MI-6) persisted, and finally the Editor agreed to meet this fellow, by appointment (arranged via Hushmail) in the fishing tackle area of a sports store on Fifth Avenue. The Editor has no interest in sport and had never been inside a sports store. However at the appointed hour, the Editor appeared, and found this man lurking in the traditional grey raincoat amid the fishing rods. We repaired to the Algonquin Hotel, where the operative proceeded to pump the Editor on one subject alone, namely Lt. Mark Delmart Vreeland.

Subsequently, Demchuk pestered the Editor to reveal all he knew about the Iraqi ‘Sarindar’ WMD removal programme, under which two Soviet ships had sailed from the Iraqi port of Umm Qasr in February 2002, ahead of the illegal invasion. The Editor had obtained information on this from open sources, especially the high-level Romanian defector, Ion Pacepa, and additionally from Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU), some information about which is available on the Internet.

In other words, the information supplied to this ‘US’ operative by the Editor was all obtained from open sources. The operative ordered a number of our publications which he said he would pay for, received them, but later vanished without fulfilling his financial undertaking (par for the course).

In March 2005, the Editor suddenly received a phone call from this Pentagon-linked operative in London, in which he spoke immediately about some operation in Monaco involving the dubious operative Bernie Ecclestone. The US operative appeared to assume that the Editor knew what he was talking about, as he gave the Editor to understand that he (Demchuk) believed that the Editor was involved with whatever operation in Monaco (a key CIA center) he was talking about. When the Editor said: ‘I have no idea what you are talking about. You’d better go back to your source’, there was a very long and stony silence.

He then said: ‘Well, that’s very surprising, in view of where this comes from’. Since the Editor knew from another source that Demchuk had just visited MI-6, it almost immediately became crystal clear that this was yet another attempt by MI-6 to ‘sting’ the Editor of this service.

In view of the fact that a US ‘inside’ source told a contact of the Editor’s in February 2010 that ‘MI-6 intend to take Story out’, because he knows too much about what is going on (and what they are up to), we place the foregoing information on the record again: and we will revisit these sequences with greater, hitherto unpublished, detail, in due course.

If the British intelligence community thinks it can intimidate a private publisher whose sole interest is to expose the racketeering that these people are all trying to cover up, it had better think again. You could argue that what we have done to date has actually assisted the British authorities to get their acts together in the face of this unprecedented crisis: but to be informed, after going through so much, that they intend to ‘take Story down’, is one slap in the face too many: and it reflects very badly on the US source of this disgraceful threat and further intimidation attempt, as well.

For the elimination of all residual doubt, we will persist with these exposures until such time as the necessary remedial measures have been taken. Interestingly, as you will have noted appended to this report (Appendix), Lord Myners, the City (of London) Minister in the Labour Government, has just indicated that the measures taken to discipline the City have been quite inadequate to date – although he fails to use words like ‘criminal’, ‘fraud’, ‘organised crime’, ‘racketeering’, ‘Fraudulent Finance’ etc: so he has a great deal of catching up (with us) to do.

(2): See the following reports on this website [Archive]:

• 9th January 2010: Text of the CMKM/CMKX lawsuit against the S.E.C.: Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx): Santa Ana, California. Subsequent to our posting the complete text of the Complaint immediately it had been filed, the text was also made available on the following link: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda

• 29th January 2010: Service of CMKM/CMKX $3.87 trillion suit vs. S.E.C.

• 07 February 2010: Legal moves to sue those blocking the Settlements

• 02 March 2010: S.E.C. Phantom Shares Fraud: New Intelligence

(3): See text of the letter from Mr A. Clifton Hodges, Attorney for the CMKM/CMKX victims, to the Office of the Attorney General for New York State, Mr Andrew Cuomo: report of 2nd March 2010.

(4): Wanta’s rôle, having served as courier between Bush Sr. and Gorbachëv, has always been to facilitate thefts and diversions of funds to George Bush Sr. (and Gorbachëv, given that the former Communist President is a partner with Bush Sr. in Deutsche AG., as explained in this and recent reports). This helps to explain why from time to time during these investigations, we have been told that ‘Bush Sr. considers the monies to belong to him’.

(5) A ‘Foreclosure Autopsy’ reporting service is available, for instance, from the following analyst:

Charles Wayne Cox
Certified Forensic Loan Analyst
Notary Public
131 Sutphen Street
Santa Cruz
California 95060
Telephone: 831-466 3440
Facsimile: 619-330 2379
Email: mailto:Charles@BayLiving.com
Website: www.ForensicLoanAnalyst.com

Charles Cox is recommended to the Editor personally by a friend of impeccable integrity who is also an expert on these issues, based in San Diego. Cox is a Para-Legal and a noted forensic expert on reading mortgage documents, serving lawyers to help their foreclosure clients. Our friend and correspondent wrote, when introducing Charles Cox: ‘Charles helped a friend of mine here in San Diego by reading his original Note and mortgage documents. Incredibly, the Note to the mortgage was made out to San Diego. Later, a copy from the County Recorder’s office showed that San Diego had been crossed out, and written in was ‘United Republic’.

The mortgage was done by a mortgage company in Colorado (now out of business) but was sold to Aurora which was owned by Lehman Brothers. Aurora is still the servicer on the loan, and my friend is suing them and requested through a qualified letter a copy of the original Note to show that they are the legal owners of the Note’.

(6): ‘Northern Rock’s Line in Excuses: Holding Paid-out Title Deeds for Five Years: A forensic analysis of how Northern Rock managed to hold on to title deeds belonging to a former mortgagor, with details of its conflicting excuses for non-performance’: International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York, Numbers 1 and 2, pages F-153 to F-172.

(7) ‘Securitization is completely illegal and fraudulent under US law’, Economic Intelligence Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York, pages 5-21.

(8): ‘Gensler Turns Back on Wall Street to Push Derivatives Overhaul’,
Bloomberg, 12th February 2010.

(9): ‘Gensler Turns Back on Wall Street to Push Derivatives Overhaul’,
Bloomberg, op. cit., 12th February 2010.

(10) ‘January 2010 News and Information for DTCC customers’ published
by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation’, accessed 13th February 2010.

(11): The derivatives data maintained by the Bank for International Settlements, and reproduced by the International Monetary Fund in successive issues of its literature, are the only ‘reliable’ data available. Because they are issued by the BIS, they are authoritative, but it is not known whether they are accurate. The BIS data, which exclude double counting, showed that in June 2008, total Notional Over-the-Counter derivatives contracts outstanding on that basis reached some $693,814 billion. By December 2008, this total had contracted to $547,371 billion given the discontinuity of September 2008; but by June 2008, the total outstanding had recovered to $604,622 billion.

The Gross Market value of total underlying derivatives contracts outstanding amounted to $20.4 trillion in June 2008. $32.2 trillion in December 2008, and $25.4 trillion in June 2009.

(12): ‘January 2010 News and Information for DTCC customers’ published
by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation’, op. cit., accessed 13th February 2010.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time AMENDING AND INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE. In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].