WORST FINANCIAL TERRORISM SABOTAGE IN HISTORY

story2

U.S. CADRES TOO COWARDLY, WEAK AND FECKLESS TO ARREST BUSH SR. FOR FINANCIAL TERRORISM AND OPEN-ENDED WANTON MAFIOSO SABOTAGE

Saturday 10 July 2010 00:01

NEW INFORMATION:

BELOW:
CIA/MI6.OBAMA/BUSH SR./CHENEY ORDERED CHISTOPHER STORY’S ASSASSINATION
AND ARE SUPRISED AND TERRIFIED THAT HE IS NOT DEAD

OBAMA AND BUSH ‘SPOKEN TO’ BY MEN WITH GUNS

• When ‘President’ Barack Hussein Obama touched down on the White House Lawn at 5:30pm on 9th July, he was ‘spoken to’. Enquiries by this service confirm that those doing the ‘speaking’ were not Secret Service operatives. On the contrary they were men with guns.

• Within the past 24-30 hours, private citizen George Godfather H. W. Bush Sr. has likewise been ‘spoken to’ twice. The people doing the ‘speaking’ were men with guns.

• The Chinese have had enough and are ready to take drastic lethal measures.

• Private citizens George H. W. Bush Sr. and Neil Bush think they are immortal and can take the loot they are blocking to the grave.

• Obama, who answers to the private citizen George H. W. Bush Sr., is saying he’s a ‘national citizen’. In order to be President of the United States, under the Constitution and the Soldiers and Sailors Act, you have to be a NATURAL citizen born in the United States or born in a US military family serving abroad.

CIA/CHENEY/MI6/OBAMA/BUSH SR. HAVE ATTEMPTED
TO ASSASSINATE CHRISTOPHER STORY
A detailed report on this assassination attempt and the horrible illness inflicted on the Editor as a consequence will be published as soon as feasible.

•We now have proof that the CIA/MI6/Obama/Bush/Cheney issued an assassination order against this Editor. We have proof that they are suprised that the Editor is not dead.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• THE WHOLE WORLD AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL KNOWS IN DETAIL ABOUT THIS U.S. CORRUPTION AND CRIMINAL FINANCIAL TERRORISM CRISIS, NOT LEAST FROM THIS WEBSITE. THEY RIGHTLY REGARD THE UNITED STATES AS AN ARROGANT, RUTHLESS PARIAH STATE THAT IMAGINES IT CAN DO WHAT IT PLEASES AS IT DESTROYS ITSELF

• LIENHOLDERS HAVE SEIZED CONTROL OF BANK OF AMERICA, CHARLOTTE, NC., AND OF DEUTSCHE BANK, FRANKFURT AND HAVE CLEANED OUT THE SABOTEURS: SEE BELOW

• HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SIGNED THE NECESSARY PAYOUT DOCUMENTS, AS EXPECTED, DURING HER VISIT TO NEW YORK. SHE WAS DOUBLE-CROSSED BY BUSH SR.

• SEE KEY POINTS BELOW AND CONFIRMATION IN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW A. CLIFTON HODGES’ LETTER TO THE BRITISH CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER, GEORGE OSBORNE, DATED 8TH JULY 2010. THIS LETTER CONFIRMS ALL OF THE KEY POINTS OUTLINED BELOW.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports on the US/German/French official criminality underlying this crisis.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock.

• We sell books DIRECT ONLY. We also supply to bookstores.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• OUR U.S. LANDLINES ARE NOW PERMANENTLY CLOSED BECAUSE OF U.S. HARASSMENT.
WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL, UK FAX OR VIA THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• FOR LATEST INFORMATION ON OUR INTELLIGENCE PUBLICATIONS, SEE SECOND PANEL.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

EMAIL POLICY: All anonymous emails from parties who are too wet and scared to provide their full coordinates as required by our ‘Contact Us’ facility are trashed unread. All uncouth, New Age, rude, discourteous, blasphemous, satanic, goss, filthy and otherwise objectionable emails, including ignorant rants promoting ‘Black’ revisionist claptrap about e.g. the British Monarchy ‘owning’ America and other old Nazi ‘Black’ propaganda emanating from the CIA’s massive lie and disinformation apparat, are trashed. For many years this website has carried a statement at the foot of the reports stating in crystal clear English that we will NOT enter into correspondence concerning the current and earlier reports posted on this website.

• We use simple, plain English so that people can understand what we say.

• We correspond with known and trusted correspondents only. Stray questions about of the blue on matters connected with the Settlements are not answered.

As you can see from the above, we have closed down all our communications because of interminable and intolerable harassment from the United States. We have also added a large number of parties to our ‘Black List’ so that their incessant emails bounce.

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••*

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

• KEY POINTS:

• The Lienholders exercised a foreclosure and management takeover on Friday 2nd and Saturday 3rd July 2010 of Deutsche Bank, Frankfurt, Germany and of Bank of America, Charlotte, NC. They took this action due to ongoing sabotage by the US official keptocracy.

• They immediately removed people in both banks working for the saboteurs and opponents of the necessary resolutions and cleared derivatives (toxic debt) off the balance sheets.

• This took Deutsche Bank out of the control of Bush Sr.’s agent [see earlier reports: Archive], Chancellor Angela Merkel, and the saboteurs in Germany.

• Likewise they took the CIA’s compromised Bank of America out of the control of the corrupt bankers and CIA saboteurs in the United States.

• Her Majesty The Queen signed the necessary authorities for the Refunding Programme, the Loan Facility and other necessary papers during her visit to New York, as expected.

• As a result of the above the necessary funds were available for distribution
on Tuesday 6th July 2010.

• As usual, George Bush Sr. interfered, as a consequence of which the Chinese parties had a ‘talk’ with the corrupt, demonic Godfather Bush Sr.

• By 7th July (Wednesday) a full meeting of Compliance Officers had taken place and the parties were again said to be prepared to initiate the transfers.

• Whereupon the corrupt Leon Panetta, Director of Central Intelligence (CIA), pathetically following ‘instructions’ issued by a private citizen named George H. W. Bush and issued to his poodle in the White House, the gutless Barack Hussein Obama, issued instructions to banking authorities the ‘placate but do not pay’ (accounting for the immediate lies summarised below), thus ‘preventing’ the feckless and terrified banking authorities from making any transfers.

• Bush Sr.’s poodle, Barack Hussein Obama, is too weak and lacking in backbone to grasp that Bush Sr.’s threats [see below] are BLUFF. He lacks the spine to stand up to this crook and face him down, which is the only way to deal with these possessed ‘Black’ US Nazi operatives, as we have amply demonstrated on this website

• On 7th July, the Chinese authorities then had another talk’ with Bush Sr., as a consequence of which the payout procedures were put back in place on that date, to start up at 3:00pm EDT..

• Having thus lied as usual to the Chinese parties, private citizen Bush Sr. contacted Barack Hussein Obama and INSTRUCTED HIM not to allow the release of the funds.

• In that telephone call to the White House, Bush Sr. also threatened that if Obama authorised release of the funds, Bush Sr. would go to the Supreme Court and have Obama’s Presidency terminated’ [see earlier reports, notably the Biden comment on this score].

• As a consequence, the terrified and gutless Obama obeyed the private citizen George H. W. Bush and the agreed-upon payout of the Settlement funds has not taken place.

• Michael C. Cottrell, BA, M.S., was duly advised on Tuesday 6th July that the preliminary payment due to him would be satisfied on that date and that the Loan Facility would be in place on Thursday 8th July 2010.

• On Friday 9th July ‘the word went out’ that Mr Cottrell was not to be paid, the opposite of what had been categorically stated earlier.

• The payments agreed to and set out in the Basel List have not been affected as a direct consequence of this sabotage.

• Given the above, Gold Badges, US Law Enforcement, the corrupted US military under the former CIA Director Robert Gates, et al., are all in continuing dereliction of their duty in failing to arrest and lock up the Financial Terrorist George H. W. Bush Sr., either because they, like Joseph Biden, are all blackmailed and compromised, or because they fear that Mr Bush Sr.’s thuggists will murder them, and because they lack the intelligence to understand that Bush Sr.’s behaviour amounts to nothing more than the familiar childish, weak Psy-Ops BLUFF and bullying overfamiliar to students of the Mafiosi Godfathers, of which this criminal is the most ruthless and dangerous operative alive today.

• US law enforcement, Gold badges, feckless CIA operatives, cloth-eared, arrogant and corrupt US military cadres have accordingly dragged the reputation of the United States below sewer level in the eyes of all in the know at highest levels worldwide, with their gutless behaviour.

• Everyone who is anyone in positions of relevant importance worldwide is fully aware of this scandalous state of affairs, not least from this website, which has enormous clout ‘where it matters’. They had better exercise their powers to put an end to what is undoubtedly the biggest financial terrorism and corruption crisis in world history.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

LETTER FROM ATTORNEY-AT-LAW A. CLIFTON HODGES TO GEORGE OSBORNE,
BRITISH CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER: 8TH JULY 2010

HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
4 EAST HOLLY STREET
SUITE 202
PASADENA
CA 91103

Telephone: (626) 564-9797
Facsimile: (626) 564-9111

A. Clifton Hodges
James S. Kostas
Donald W. Ricketts*
*Of Counsel

July 8th, 2010

MOST URGENT

Sent Via E-Mail and Facsimile
The Right Honorable George Osborne, MP
Chancellor of the Exchequer
HM Treasury
Horse Guards Road
London SW1A 2HQ
Fax No. 020 7270 4580

Re: U.S. Dollar Refunding Project

Dear Honorable George Osborne:

I write to you once more in furtherance of matters raised in my prior correspondence of June 25, 2010; I understand that you have received instructions regarding my approach, and the various points raised in my earlier messages. Your assistance is most urgently required in addressing these matters, and the apparent disavowal of earlier agreements made and reaffirmed at previous G-8 meetings concerning the U.S. Dollar Refunding Project. I write on behalf of my clients Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., of Erie, Pennsylvania, USA, and his corporations: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., registered in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and Cottrell Securities Limited, registered in England and Wales.

The events of the past week are difficult to understand, and impossible to tolerate. I am advised and understand that the Lienholders executed a foreclosure and management takeover Fri-Sat 2-3 July of Deutsche Bank in Frankfurt, Germany, and of Bank of America in Charlotte, NC.

They “cleaned out” both banks of people working for the opponents and cleared toxic debt [including derivatives] off the bank balance sheets. Accordingly, they took DB out of the control of Angela Merkel and opponents in Germany, and they took BOA out of all possible control by the opponents in this country. As a result of these actions, it was expected that the World Global Settlement funds could be distributed this week.

These funds were available for distribution on Tuesday, July 6. Because George Bush Sr. was initiating interference, the Chinese authorities then had a “talk” with Bush Sr. By Wednesday afternoon a full Compliance Officer meeting had been conducted, and the appropriate parties were again prepared to initiate the transfers when Mr. Leon Panetta, pursuant to instructions from President Obama and George Bush Sr. issued instructions to the banking authorities to “placate but do not pay”; this prevented the authorities from making any such transfers. I am advised that the Chinese authorities then had another “talk” with Bush Sr., and all was ready again on today, July 7, and set to commence @ 3:00 PM EDT.

At approximately 3:00 PM EDT, I am told by several sources, George Bush Sr. apparently contacted President Obama and instructed him not to allow release of the funds. Bush Sr. then advised the President that if the funds were released, Bush would “go to the Supreme Court and have Obama’s Presidency terminated”. In accord with these instructions, the payout of the World Global Settlement funds has not proceeded.

THE PAYMENTS PREVIOUSLY AGREED TO AND SET FORTH ON THE BASEL LIST HAVE NOT BEEN MADE AS A DIRECT RESULT OF THESE CONTINUED DELAYS. Direct intervention through your good offices on behalf of the Royal Monarchal Power, is absolutely required to bring this matter to conclusion. To secure release of these Settlement funds, it is imperative that your power as one of the U.S. Treasury Lienholders, be exercised with such force as may be required to effect completion.

I respectfully plead that you utilize the inherent Royal Monarchal Power at the earliest possible moment to ensure completion of this funding. Thank you in advance for your assistance; please contact me directly if I can provide any additional information or help.

Sincerely,

HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
A. CLIFTON HODGES

ACH/gm

Cc: Lindell H. Bonney, Sr.
Colonel Dana Wilcox
Michael C. Cottrell, BA, MS
President Barack Obama
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II
Interpol, USNCB

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

THE FOLLOWING DATA HAS BEEN PUBLISHED AT THE FOOT
OF MOST OF THESE REPORTS FOR THE PAST THREE YEARS++:

• COMPILED BY U.S. SECURITIES EXPERT MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S..

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”.

Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge:
Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
NOTICES:

BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE.

In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest annual fee. This is done on-line in the usual way [direct with supplier].

Save

Advertisements

BIG U.S. BANKS CONFIRMED AS CRIMINAL ENTERPRISES

chrisstory

WACHOVIA WANTED TO SUE US FOR LABELLING IT A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE

Thursday 1 July 2010 00:01

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports on the US/German/French official criminality underlying this crisis.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock.

• We sell books DIRECT ONLY. We also supply to bookstores.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• OUR U.S. LANDLINES ARE NOW PERMANENTLY CLOSED BECAUSE OF U.S. HARASSMENT.
WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL, UK FAX OR VIA THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY.

• FOR LATEST INFORMATION ON OUR INTELLIGENCE PUBLICATIONS, SEE SECOND PANEL.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:
Note: Nothing should be construed from the fact that this report is about the criminal banks engaged in drug-money laundering, and not about the usual subject. We haven’t enough reliable material to elaborate further, yet, following the end of the abortive G-20 meeting in Toronto.

The following banks and currency exchanges are mentioned in this report:

American Express Bank International
Banco Santander SA
Bank of America
Casa de Cambio Puebla SA
Citigroup, Inc.
HSBC Holdings, London and Mexico
Mexican street currency-exchange firms [3,000]
Standard Chartered PLC, London
Wachovia, including London
Wells Fargo
Western Union

WACHOVIA, WELLS FARGO, BANK OF AMERICA ARE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISES, LIKE WE SAID
Some time ago, we learned that Wachovia had consulted its lawyers to establish whether they could sue us for describing the bank, among others, as a criminal enterprise. Their lawyers are believed to have advised them, in so many words, that, not least given investigative journalistic freedom of speech considerations, our observations represented ‘fair comment’. Behind that advice lay the knowledge that since Wachovia was involved in money laundering drug money, we might well know this and be able to prove it. So the matter was dropped.

As the entire ‘Black’ Octopus criminal carousel unravels faster than the kleptocracy can keep up with events, other sources are now starting to do our exposure work for us. Late in the day, as usual: but better late than never. We therefore take the opportunity to post, verbatim, the following article by Michael Smith for Bloomberg, which of course proves our point. Wachovia, Wells Fargo and Bank of America, for starters, are egregious criminal enterprises. Money laundering of drug proceeds is an unspeakable crime and the most senior officials of these institutions should be arrested and forced to suffer SEVERE consequences. But that isn’t happening.

‘MAINSTREAM’ MEDIA CONTINUE TO IGNORE THE CENTRAL ISSUE: RAMPANT CRIMINALITY
We are sick and tired of the way the so-called ‘mainstream’ media are waffling about every nuance under the sun and OMITTING the central issue: RAMPANT CRIMINALITY and the banks’ open-ended breaches of the law, and their arrogance based on fears that they might collapse.

Securitisation is ILLEGAL in the United States and in all Common Law countries, as we have demonstrated and proved with the aid of impeccable outside academic research. Yet there has been NO RESPONSE TO OUR EXPOSURE OF THIS FLOUTING OF THE RULE OF LAW, EITHER.

The following Bloomberg report indicates that, at long last, some ‘mainstream’ reporters have managed to lift themselves off their brains and to start exposing the truth. Separately, we have been exposing drug-trafficking operations in our title The Latin American Times, and continue to do so. You may also be interested to know that before his ‘switch’, following the ‘bait’ during which he stole the Editor’s $35,000 LOAN which should have been repaid at arms’ length plus 7% per annum for two years, on 11th June 2007, Wanta told the Editor: ‘If you expose the drug traffickers, they will kill you’. We listed that threat among the 37 threats against the Editor so far received.

THE BLOOMBERG REPORT STARTS HERE:
[Note: With interpolations by the Editor].

U.S. BANKS FINANCING MEXICO DRUG GANGS ADMITTED IN WELLS FARGO DEAL
By Michael Smith

June 29 (Bloomberg) — Just before sunset on April 10, 2006, a DC-9 jet landed at the international airport in the port city of Ciudad del Carmen, 500 miles east of Mexico City. As soldiers on the ground approached the plane, the crew tried to shoo them away, saying there was a dangerous oil leak. So the troops grew suspicious and searched the jet.

They found 128 black suitcases, packed with 5.7 tons of cocaine, valued at $100 million. The stash was supposed to have been delivered from Caracas to drug traffickers in Toluca, near Mexico City, Mexican prosecutors later found. Law enforcement officials also discovered something else.

The smugglers had bought the DC-9 with laundered funds they transferred through two of the biggest banks in the U.S.: Wachovia Corp. and Bank of America Corp., Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its August 2010 issue.

This was no isolated incident. Wachovia, it turns out, had made a habit of helping move money for Mexican drug smugglers. Wells Fargo & Co., which bought Wachovia in 2008, has admitted in court that its unit failed to monitor and report suspected money laundering by narcotics traffickers — including the cash used to buy four planes that shipped a total of 22 tons of cocaine.

The admission came in an agreement that Charlotte, North Carolina-based Wachovia struck with federal prosecutors in March, and it sheds light on the largely undocumented role of U.S. banks in contributing to the violent drug trade that has convulsed Mexico for the past four years.

BLATANT DISREGARD FOR THE RULE OF LAW AND BASIC MORALITY
Wachovia admitted it didn’t do enough to spot illicit funds in handling $378.4 billion for Mexican-currency-exchange houses from 2004 to 2007. That’s the largest violation of the Bank Secrecy Act, an anti-money-laundering law, in U.S. history — a sum equal to one-third of Mexico’s current gross domestic product.

“Wachovia’s blatant disregard for our banking laws gave international cocaine cartels a virtual carte blanche to finance their operations”, says Jeffrey Sloman, the Federal Prosecutor who handled the case.

Since 2006, more than 22,000 people have been killed in drug-related battles that have raged mostly along the 2,000-mile (3,200-kilometer) border that Mexico shares with the U.S. In the Mexican city of Ciudad Juarez, just across the border from El Paso, Texas, 700 people had been murdered this year as of mid- June. Six Juarez police officers were slaughtered by automatic weapons fire in a midday ambush in April.

Rondolfo Torre, the leading candidate for governor in the Mexican border state of Tamaulipas, was gunned down yesterday, less than a week before elections in which violence related to drug trafficking was a central issue.

45000 MEXICAN TROOPS DEPLOYED AGAINST THE CARTELS
Mexican President Felipe Calderon vowed to crush the drug cartels when he took office in December 2006, and he’s since deployed 45,000 troops to fight the cartels.

They’ve had little success.

Among the dead are police, soldiers, journalists and ordinary citizens. The United States has ‘pledged’ Mexico $1.1 billion in the past two years to aid in the fight against narcotics cartels.

[EDITOR’S INSERT: This is absurd. Under the standard double-mindedness, dialectical non-ethic that characterises the criminalist behaviour of elements of the US Government, law enforcement and the Drug Enforcement Administration battle valiantly against the proliferation of Mexican drug gangs, which now operate in every corner of the United States. Meanwhile, the drug offensive was organised and orchestrated by CIA operatives in Latin America in the 1970s and 1980s, aided by Israeli ‘Black’ intelligence headed by David Kimche (who died of brain cancer on 8th March 2010) and Michael Harari. Their involvement is proven by the Cutolo Affidavit dated 11th March 1980.

The military officer (Cutolo) was subsequently murdered, along with ‘Bo’ Baker and others because of their knowledge inter alia of this criminal activity. The barrels of precursor chemicals found in the forests fo Colombia and elsewhere did not materialse from nowhere. The ‘Anglo-Saxons’ and their nefarious Israeli cutouts took over and organised the disparate competing Latin American gangs, establishing a self-perpetuating scoourge run by peasant criminals: a perfect cut-out.

Incidentally, after David Kimche died, The Daily Telegraph boobed by publishing a photograph in which he was shown (engaged in negotiations with the Lebanese in 1972) but wrongly attributed. We have published a recent issue of Arab-Asian Affairs (which title we bought unknowingly from Kimche’s brother, Jon Kimche, in 1975). Jon Kimche used to come to our office, as he continued for a time as Editor (until he doubled his price, whereupon we fired him). We are therefore familiar with the facial characteristics of the Kimche brothers. Investigations by this service revealed that ALL picture representations of David Kimche published in The Jerusalem Post, Haaretz, The Daily Telegraph, The Times and US newspapers have been FRAUDULENT all along.

They have all identified several individuals wrongly as David Kimche and continue to do so after his death. Why? To protect ongoing and past, highly incriminating and sensitive drug operations].

In May, President Barack Obama said he’d send 1,200 National Guard troops, adding to the 17,400 agents on the U.S. side of the border to help stem drug traffic and illegal immigration.

Behind the carnage in Mexico is an industry that supplies hundreds of tons of cocaine, heroin, marijuana and methamphetamines to Americans. The cartels have built a network of dealers in 231 U.S. cities, taking in about $39 billion in sales annually, according to the Justice Department.

ITS THE CRIMINAL BANKS THAT SHOULD BE PROSECUTED AND MADE TO SUFFER
Twenty million people in the U.S. regularly use illegal drugs, spurring street crime and wrecking families. Narcotics cost the U.S. economy $215 billion a year — enough to cover health care for 30.9 million Americans — in overburdened courts, prisons and hospitals and lost productivity.

“It’s the banks laundering money for the cartels that finances the tragedy”, says Martin Woods, Director of Wachovia’s anti-money-laundering unit in London from 2006 to 2009.

• Woods says he quit the bank in disgust after executives ignored his documentation that drug dealers were funneling money through Wachovia’s branch network.

“If you don’t see the correlation between the money laundering by banks and the 22,000 people killed in Mexico, you’re missing the point”, Woods says.

WACHOVIA ONE OF MANY U.S. AND EUROPEAN BANKS HANDLING DRUG MONEY
Wachovia is just one of the U.S. and European banks that have been used for drug money laundering. For the past two decades, Latin American drug traffickers have gone to U.S. banks to cleanse their dirty cash, says Paul Campo, head of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration’s financial crimes unit.

Miami-based American Express Bank International paid fines in both 1994 and 2007 after admitting that it had failed to spot and report drug dealers laundering money through its accounts. Drug traffickers used accounts at Bank of America in Oklahoma City to buy three planes that carried 10 tons of cocaine, according to Mexican court filings.

Federal agents caught people who work for Mexican cartels depositing illicit funds in Bank of America accounts in Atlanta, Chicago and Brownsville, Texas, from 2002 to 2009. Mexican drug dealers used shell companies to open accounts at London-based HSBC Holdings Plc, Europe’s biggest bank by assets, an investigation by the Mexican Finance Ministry found.

CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE BANKS HIDE BEHIND RHETORIC AND CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY
Those two banks weren’t accused of wrongdoing. Bank of America spokeswoman Shirley Norton and HSBC spokesman Roy Caple say laws bar them from discussing specific clients. They say their banks strictly follow the government rules.

“Bank of America takes its anti-money-laundering responsibilities very seriously”. Norton says. [EDITOR: Translation: This is a deliberately vacuous, meaningless and empty statement].

A Mexican judge on January 22 accused the owners of six centros cambiarios, or money changers, in Culiacan and Tijuana of laundering drug funds through their accounts at the Mexican units of Banco Santander SA, Citigroup Inc. and HSBC, according to court documents filed in the case.

The money changers are in jail while being tried. Citigroup, HSBC and Santander, which is the largest Spanish bank by assets, weren’t accused of any wrongdoing.

The three banks say Mexican law bars them from commenting on the case, adding that they each carefully enforce anti-money-laundering programs.

HSBC has stopped accepting dollar deposits in Mexico, and Citigroup no longer allows noncustomers to change dollars there. Citigroup detected suspicious activity in the Tijuana accounts, reported it to regulators and closed the accounts, spokesman Paulo Carreno says. [EDITOR: Yeah, after the event and after the temperature got too hot].

FOCUS IS ON THE CARTELS: BUT THEY CAN’T OPERATE WITHOUT CRIMINAL BANKS
On June 15, the Mexican Finance Ministry announced it would set limits for banks on cash deposits in dollars. Mexico’s drug cartels have become multinational criminal enterprises.

Some of the gangs have delved into other illegal activities such as gunrunning, kidnapping and smuggling people across the border, as well as into seemingly legitimate areas such as trucking, travel services and air cargo transport, according to the us Justice Department’s National Drug Intelligence Center.

These criminal empires have no choice but to use the global banking system to finance their businesses, Mexican Senator Felipe Gonzalez says.

“With so much cash, the only way to move this money is through the banks”, says Gonzalez, who represents a central Mexican state and chairs the senate public safety committee.

[EDITOR: In January 2009, Sr. Maria Antonio Costa, head of the Vienna-based UNDOC, told the Austrian journal Profil in an interview that the only liquidity in the interbank sector during the second half of 2008 was drug money. Actually, he meant from the discontinuity that took place on 10-12 September, after which the Editor received three gunshots on our voicemail: see passim].

Gonzalez, a member of Calderon’s National Action Party, carries a .38 revolver for protection.

“I know this won’t stop the narcos when they come through that door with machine guns”. he says, pointing to the entrance to his office. “But at least I’ll take one with me”.

NO BANK MORE CLOSELY LINKED TO MEXICAN DRUG LAUNDERING THAN WACHOVIA
No bank has been more closely connected with Mexican money laundering than Wachovia. Founded in 1879, Wachovia became the largest bank by assets in the southeastern U.S. by 1900. After the Great Depression, some savvy people in North Carolina called the bank “Walk-Over-Ya” because it had foreclosed on farms in the region.

By 2008, Wachovia was the sixth-largest American lender, and it faced $26 billion in losses from subprime mortgage loans. That cost Wachovia Chief Executive Officer Kennedy Thompson his job in June 2008.

Six months later, San Francisco-based Wells Fargo, which dates from 1852, bought Wachovia for $12.7 billion, creating the largest network of bank branches in the U.S. Thompson, who now works for private-equity firm Aquiline Capital Partners LLC in New York, declined to comment.

As Wachovia’s balance sheet was bleeding, its legal woes were mounting. In the three years leading up to Wachovia’s agreement with the Justice Department, grand juries served the bank with 6,700 subpoenas requesting information.

WACHOVIA REACTED LETHARGICALLY TO THIS GRAND JURY ONSLAUGHT
The bank didn’t react quickly enough to the prosecutors’ requests and failed to hire enough investigators, the U.S. Treasury Department said in March. After a 22-month investigation, the Justice Department on March 12 charged Wachovia with violating the Bank Secrecy Act by failing to run an effective anti-money-laundering program.

Five days later, Wells Fargo promised in a Miami federal courtroom to revamp its detection systems. Wachovia’s new owner paid $160 million in fines and penalties, less than 2 percent of its $12.3 billion profit in 2009.

If Wells Fargo keeps its pledge, the U.S. government will, according to the agreement, drop all charges against the bank in March 2011. [EDITOR: WHAT A SCANDAL].

Wells Fargo regrets that some of Wachovia’s former anti-money-laundering efforts fell short, spokeswoman Mary Eshet says. Wells Fargo has invested $42 million in the past three years to improve its anti-money-laundering program and has been working with regulators, she says.

‘AFTER THE HORSES HAVE BOLTED’ WHINING
“We have substantially increased the caliber and number of staff in our international investigations group, and we also significantly upgraded the monitoring software”, Eshet says. The agreement bars the bank from contesting or contradicting the facts in its admission.

The bank declined to answer specific questions, including how much it made by handling $378.4 billion — including $4 billion of cash-from Mexican exchange companies. [EDITOR: PROTECTED].

The 1970 Bank Secrecy Act requires banks to report all cash transactions above $10,000 to regulators and to tell the Government about other suspected money-laundering activity.

Big banks employ hundreds of investigators and spend millions of dollars on software programs to scour accounts. [EDITOR: GREAT. BUT HASN’T ADDRESSED THE BANKS’ CRIMINALITY].

No big U.S. bank — Wells Fargo included — has ever been indicted for violating the Bank Secrecy Act or any other Federal law. Instead, the Justice Department settles criminal charges by using deferred-prosecution agreements, in which a bank pays a fine and promises do it again.

BANKS PROTECTED BY FEARS THAT A BANK COLLAPSE WOULD IMPLODE THE SYSTEM
Large banks are protected from indictments by a variant of the too-big-to-fail theory.

Indicting a big bank could trigger a mad dash by investors to dump shares and cause panic in financial markets, says Jack Blum, a U.S. Senate investigator for 14 years and a consultant to international banks and brokerage firms on money laundering.

The theory is like a get-out-of-jail-free card for big banks, Blum says. [EDITOR: Jack Blum is a highly respected investigator, a man of the highest integrity and calibre].

“There’s no capacity to regulate or punish them because they’re too big to be threatened with failure”, Blum says. “They seem to be willing to do anything that improves their bottom line, until they’re caught”. [EDITOR: ACCURATE, ACCURATE, ACCURATE, ACCURATE].

Wachovia’s run-in with Federal prosecutors hasn’t troubled investors. Wells Fargo’s stock traded at $30.86 on March 24, up 1 percent in the week after the March 17 agreement was announced.

Moving money is central to the drug trade — from the cash that people tape to their bodies as they cross the U.S.-Mexican border, to the $100,000 wire transfers they send from Mexican exchange houses to big U.S. banks.

BORDER FENCE DOESN’T STOP ANYONE. A HUGE WALL IS NECESSARY
In Tijuana, 15 miles south of San Diego, Gustavo Rojas has lived for a quarter of a century in a shack in the shadow of the 10-foot-high (3-meter-high) steel border fence that separates the U.S. and Mexico there. He points to holes burrowed under the barrier.

“They go across with drugs and come back with cash,” Rojas, 75, says.

“This fence doesn’t stop anyone”.

Drug money moves back and forth across the border in an endless cycle. In the U.S., couriers take the cash from drug sales to Mexico — as much as $29 billion a year, according to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. That would be about 319 tons of $100 bills. [EDITOR: NO. $45 BILLION].

They hide it in cars and trucks to smuggle into Mexico. There, cartels pay people to deposit some of the cash into Mexican banks and branches of international banks. The narcos launder much of what’s left through money changers.

DRUG MONEY LAUNDERED THROUGH STREET MONEY TRADERS
Anyone who has been to Mexico is familiar with these street-corner money changers; Mexican regulators say there are at least 3,000 of them from Tijuana to Cancun, usually displaying large signs advertising the day’s dollar-peso exchange rate.

Mexican banks are regulated by the National Banking and Securities Commission, which has an anti-money-laundering unit; the money changers are supposedly policed by Mexico’s Tax Service Administration, which has no such unit.

By law, the money changers have to demand identification from anyone exchanging more than $500. They also have to report transactions higher than $5,000 to regulators.

The cartels get around these requirements by employing legions of individuals — including relatives, maids and gardeners — to convert small amounts of dollars into pesos or to make deposits in local banks. After that, cartels wire the money to a multinational bank.

SMALL MONEY EXCHANGES ARE CALLED SMURFS
The people making the small money exchanges are known as Smurfs, after the cartoon characters.

“They can use an army of people like Smurfs and go through $1 million before lunchtime”, says Jerry Robinette, who oversees U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations along the border in east Texas.

The U.S. Treasury has been warning banks about big Mexican- currency-exchange firms laundering drug money since 1996. By 2004, many U.S. banks had closed their accounts with these companies, which are known as casas de cambio.

Wachovia ignored warnings by regulators and police, per the deferred-prosecution agreement.

“As early as 2004, Wachovia understood the risk”, the bank admitted in court. “Despite these warnings, Wachovia remained in the business”.

One customer that Wachovia took on in 2004 was Casa de Cambio Puebla SA, a Puebla, Mexico-based currency-exchange company. Pedro Alatorre, who ran a Puebla branch in Mexico City, had created front companies for cartels, according to a pending Mexican criminal case against him.

FEDERAL INDICTMENT IN MIAMI
A Federal Grand Jury in Miami indicted Puebla, Alatorre and three other executives in February 2008 for drug trafficking and money laundering. In May 2008, the Justice Department sought extradition of the suspects, saying they used shell firms to launder $720 million through U.S. banks.

Alatorre has been in a Mexican jail for 2 1/2 years. He denies any wrongdoing, his lawyer Mauricio Moreno says. Alatorre has made no court-filed responses in the U.S.

During the period in which Wachovia admitted to moving money out of Mexico for Puebla, couriers carrying clear plastic bags stuffed with cash went to the branch Alatorre operated at the Mexico City airport, according to surveillance reports by Mexican police.

Alatorre opened accounts at HSBC on behalf of front companies, Mexican investigators found.

Puebla executives used the stolen identities of 74 people to launder money through Wachovia accounts, Mexican prosecutors say in court-filed reports.

WACHOVIA NEVER REPORTED ANY TRANSACTIONS AS SUSPICIOUS
“Wachovia handled all the transfers, and they never reported any as suspicious”, says Jose Luis Marmolejo, former head of the Mexican Attorney General’s financial crimes, now in private practice.

In November 2005 and January 2006, Wachovia transferred a total of $300,000 from Puebla to a Bank of America account in Oklahoma City, according to information in the Alatorre cases in the United States and Mexico.

Drug smugglers used the funds to buy the DC-9 through Oklahoma City aircraft broker U.S. Aircraft Titles Inc., according to financial records cited in the Mexican criminal case. U.S. Aircraft Titles President Sue White declined to comment.

On April 5, 2006, a pilot flew the plane from St. Petersburg, Florida, to Caracas to pick up the cocaine, according to the DEA. Five days later, troops seized the plane in Ciudad del Carmen and burned the drugs at a nearby army base.

WACHOVIA KNEW PERFECTLY WELL WHAT WAS GOING ON
“I am sure Wachovia knew what was going on”, says jJose Marmolejo, who oversaw the criminal investigation into Wachovia’s customers.

“It went on too long and they made too much money not to have known”.

At Wachovia’s anti-money-laundering unit in London, Woods and his colleague Jim DeFazio, in Charlotte, say they suspected that drug dealers were using the bank to move funds.

Woods, a former Scotland Yard investigator, spotted illegible signatures and other suspicious markings on traveler’s checks from Mexican exchange companies, he said in a September 2008 letter to the U.K. Financial Services Authority. He sent copies of the letter to the DEA and Treasury Department in the United States.

Woods, 45, says his bosses instructed him to keep quiet and tried to have him fired, according to his letter to the FSA. In one meeting, a bank official insisted Woods shouldn’t have filed suspicious activity reports to the Government, as both US and UK laws require.

LONDON WACHOVIA BOSSES TRIES TO SILENCE WHISTLEBLOWER WHO THEN LEFT BANK
“I was shocked by the content and outcome of the meeting, genuinely traumatized”, Woods wrote.

In the U.S., DeFazio, a Federal Bureau of Investigation agent for 21 years, says he told bank executives in 2005 that the DEA was probing the transfers through Wachovia to buy the planes.

Bank executives spurned recommendations to close suspicious accounts, DeFazio, 63, says.

“I think they looked at the money and said, ‘The hell with it. We’re going to bring it in, and look at all the money we’ll make'”, DeFazio says.

“I didn’t want anything from them”, he says. “I just wanted to get out”.

Woods, who resigned from Wachovia in May 2009, now advises banks on how to combat money laundering. He declined to discuss details of Wachovia’s actions.

U.S. Comptroller of the Currency John Dugan told Woods in a March 19 2010 letter that his efforts had helped the United States build its case against Wachovia. He wrote:

“You demonstrated great courage and integrity by speaking up when you saw problems”.

It was the Puebla investigation that led U.S. authorities to the broader probe of Wachovia. On May 16, 2007, DEA agents conducted a raid of Wachovia’s international banking offices in Miami. They had a court order to seize Puebla’s accounts.

U.S. prosecutors and investigators then scrutinized the bank’s dealings with Mexican-currency-exchange firms. That led to the March deferred-prosecution agreement.

With Puebla’s Wachovia accounts seized, Alatorre and his partners shifted their laundering scheme to HSBC, according to financial documents cited in the Mexican criminal case against Alatorre.

In the three weeks after the DEA raided Wachovia, two of Alatorre’s front companies, Grupo ETPB SA and Grupo Rahero SC, made 12 cash deposits totaling $1 million at an HSBC Mexican branch, Mexican investigators found.

DRUG MONEY NOW LAUNDERED THROUGH HSBC TO BUY ANOTHER PLANE
The funds financed a Beechcraft King Air 200 plane that police seized on December 29, 2007, in Cuernavaca, 50 miles south of Mexico City, according to information in the case against Alatorre.

For years, Federal authorities watched as the wife and daughter of Oscar Oropeza, a drug smuggler working for the Matamoros-based Gulf Cartel, deposited stacks of cash at a Bank of America branch on Boca Chica Boulevard in Brownsville, Texas, less than 3 miles from the border.

Investigator Robinette sits in his pickup truck across the street from that branch. It’s a one-story, tan stucco building next to a Kentucky Fried Chicken outlet. Robinette discusses the Oropeza case with Tom Salazar, an agent who investigated the family.

“Everybody in there knew who they were — the tellers, everyone”, Salazar says.

“The bank never came to us, though”. [EDITOR: COURSE NOT. IT’S A C.I.A. CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE]

MICRO-MONEY LAUNDERING TECHNIQUE
The Oropeza case gives a new, literal meaning to the term money laundering. Oropeza’s wife, Tina Marie, and daughter Paulina Marie, deposited stashes of $20 bills several times a day into Bank of America accounts, Salazar says. Bank employees knew the Oropezas by smelling their money.

“I asked the tellers what they were talking about, and they said the money had this sweet smell like Bounce, those sheets you throw into the dryer”, Salazar says. “They told me that when they opened the vault, the smell of Bounce just poured out”.

Oropeza, 48, was arrested 820 miles from Brownsville, Texas.. On May 31, 2007, police in Saraland, Alabama, stopped him on a traffic violation. Checking his record, they learned of the investigation in Texas. They searched the van and discovered 84 kilograms (185 pounds) of cocaine hidden under a false floor. That allowed Federal agents to freeze Oropeza’s bank accounts and search his marble-floored home in Brownsville, Robinette says.

Inside, investigators found a supply of Bounce alongside the clothes dryer.

All three Oropezas pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court in Brownsville, TX, to drug and money-laundering charges in March and April 2008. Oscar Oropeza was sentenced to 15 years in prison; his wife was ordered to serve 10 months and his daughter got 6 months.

Bank of America’s Norton says: “We not only fulfilled our regulatory obligation, but we proactively worked with law enforcement on these matters”. [EDITOR: NEFARIOUS HUMBUG].

Prosecutors have tried to halt money laundering at American Express Bank International twice. In 1994, the bank, then a subsidiary of New York-based American Express Co., pledged not to allow money laundering again after two employees were convicted in a criminal case involving drug trafficker Juan Garcia Abrego.

In 1994, the bank paid $14 million to settle. Five years later, drug money again flowed through American Express Bank. Between 1999 and 2004, the bank failed to stop clients from laundering $55 million of narcotics funds, the bank admitted in a deferred-prosecution accord in August 2007.

It paid $65 million to the United States and promised not to break the law again. The government dismissed the criminal charge a year later. American Express sold the bank to the London-based Standard Chartered PLC in February 2008 for $823 million.

WESTERN UNION TURNED A BLIND EYE TO DRUG-MONEY LAUNDERING
Banks aren’t the only financial institutions that have turned a blind eye to drug cartels in moving illicit funds. Western Union Co., the world’s largest money transfer firm, agreed to pay $94 million in February 2010 to settle civil and criminal investigations by the Arizona Attorney General’s office.

Undercover state police posing as drug dealers bribed Western Union employees to illegally transfer money, says Cameron Holmes, an assistant Attorney General.

“Their allegiance was to the smugglers”, Holmes says. “What they thought about during work was ‘How may I please my highest- spending customers the most?'”

Workers in more than 20 Western Union offices allowed the customers to use multiple names, pass fictitious identifications and smudge their fingerprints on documents, court records say.

“In all the time we did undercover operations, we never once had a bribe turned down”, says Holmes, citing court affidavits.

Western Union has made significant improvements, it complies with anti-money-laundering laws and works closely with regulators and police, spokesman Tom Fitzgerald says.

For four years, Mexican authorities have been fighting a losing battle against the cartels. The police are often two steps behind the criminals. Near the southeastern corner of Texas, in Matamoros, more than 50 combat troops surround a police station.

US officers take two suspected drug traffickers inside for questioning. Nearby, two young men wearing white T-shirts and baggy pants watch and whisper into radios. These are los halcones (the falcons), whose job is to let the cartel bosses know what the police are doing.

BILLIONS MOVED ACROSS BORDERS ROUTINELY: THERE IS NO CHANGE
While the police are outmaneuvered and outgunned, ordinary Mexicans live in fear. Rojas, the man who lives in the Tijuana slum near the border fence, recalls cowering in his home as smugglers shot it out with the police.

“The only way to survive is to stay out of the way and hope the violence, the bullets, don’t come for you,” Rojas says.

To make their criminal enterprises work, the drug cartels of Mexico need to move billions of dollars across borders. That’s how they finance the purchase of drugs, planes, weapons and safe houses, Senator Gonzalez says.

“They are multinational businesses, after all”, says Gonzalez, as he slowly loads his revolver at his desk in his Mexico City office. “And they cannot work without a bank.”

To contact the reporter on this story:
Michael Smith in Santiago, Chile, at mssmith@bloomberg.net.
Last Updated: June 29, 2010 00:00 EDT

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

THE FOLLOWING DATA HAS BEEN PUBLISHED AT THE FOOT
OF MOST OF THESE REPORTS FOR THE PAST THREE YEARS++:

• COMPILED BY U.S. SECURITIES EXPERT MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S..

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”.

Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge:
Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
NOTICES:

BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE.

In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest annual fee. This is done on-line in the usual way [direct with supplier].

WHY ADMIRAL DENNIS C. BLAIR WAS SACKED BY OBAMA

chrisstory

HE PUSHED FOR THE RELEASES AND OBTAINED COPY CHECKS OF BIDEN, GEITHNER AND EMANUEL’S BUSH BRIBERY PAYMENTS

Monday 24 May 2010 02:30

• NEWS FLASH: 25th May 2010: Timothy Geithner, the US Treasury Secretary and corrupt Payola recipient, tried to do a deal with the Chinese authorities during his just-completed visit to Peking (which was why he went there) and was told in no uncertain terms: NO DEAL. GET IT DONE.

• NOTE ALSO SEPARATE IMPORTANT UPDATES [25TH MAY] INCORPORATED IN THE TEXT

• SEE UNDER THE GREEK SEGMENT BELOW:
THE GREEK DEBTS ARE VOID BECAUSE THE UNDERLYING CONTRACTS WERE ENTERED INTO FOR AN ILLEGAL PURPOSE. THEREFORE, THE GREEKS SHOULD REPUDIATE 100% OF THE FRAUDULENT DEBT ON THIS SOUND LEGAL BASIS, AND SEND THE FOREIGN (INCLUDING GERMAN) MONEY BACK WITH A NOTE SAYING: ‘THANKS, BUT ON SECOND THOUGHTS, NO THANKS’. THIS WOULD ACCELERATE THE TOTAL COLLAPSE OF THE FRAUDULENT FINANCE SECTOR, WHICH IS HAPPENING ANYWAY. GREECE WOULD BE ON SOLID LEGAL GROUND.

• THE REAL REASONS BEHIND THE ‘RESIGNATION’ OF ADMIRAL DENNIS C. BLAIR

• BIDEN TOLD WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF HE DOESN’T CEASE AND DESIST

• OBAMA’S LIES TO THE HIGHEST BRITISH AUTHORITY EXPOSED

• UPDATE, 25th May: THE SARAH FERUGSON EPISODE:
ANOTHER OPERATION AGAINST THE BRITISH MONARCHY

• THE CURSE OF STORY

• CHENEY’S ATTEMPT TO STEAL $2.0 TRILLION FROM BoA, ATLANTA

• UPDATE, 25th May: CHENEY ET AL THEN TRIED TO CASH BOGUS CERTIFICATES IN PARIS

• CRIMINAL CIA OPERATIVE CHENEY WALKS AWAY FROM HIS ATTEMPTED BANK ROBBERY.
A BRIT GETS THREE MONTHS AND DEPORTATION FOR A MINOR TRAFFIC INFRACTION.

• WHY DID THE CIA’S BANK PHYSICALLY EJECT CHENEY ET AL?

• THE WORLD FELL APART WHILE THE CROOKS CONTINUED STEALING

• CRISIS AND CURE ARE EXCLUSIVELY RESULTS OF THE CRIMINALITY EXPOSURES

• AS MI6 HAS JUST DISCOVERED, THE WHITE HOUSE LIES TO EVERYONE, EVEN THE QUEEN

• THE CURSE OF GEORGE H. W. BUSH AND THE ‘EUROPEAN CRISIS’

• CITIBANK, ATHENS: LOCUS OF WANTA’S BUSH SR. ACCOUNTS

• GERMAN BANKS SCAMMED BY BUSH, WHEREAS STOLEN BUSH
AND GORBACHEV PROCEEDS ARE STASHED IN ST GALLEN, SWITZERLAND

• BEHIND AGITPROP SECRETARY MERKEL’S ‘EURO IN DANGER’ PLOY

• FORMER BUNDESBANK PRESIDENT DID NOT DENY IN 1998 THAT GERMANY
MAY HAVE HOARDED DEUSTCHEMARKS IN ANTICIPATION OF THE EURO COLLAPSING

• GREECE SHOULD HAVE TURNED DOWN
THE GERMAN MONEY AND RESTORED THE DRACHMA

• U.S. SENATE BLOCKS IMF PAYMENTS TO DEBT SPIRAL COUNTRIES

• PAN-GERMAN POLITICAL HEGEMONY PROJECT UNRAVELLING

• 9/11: MORE DOCUMENTED ‘SMOKING GUN’ INTELLIGENCE

• REPORT FROM LONDON: ‘NICK, NICK, THE QUEEN EXPECTS ME TO GO’

• DOCUMENTS PREVIOUSLY BLOCKED BY BROWN (ON BEHALF OF GEORGE W. BUSH)
DELIVERED AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL IMMEDIATELY AHEAD OF BROWN’S RESIGNATION

• NEW UK GOVERNMENT RUSHES TO INGRATIATE ITSELF ABROAD: A SIGN OF WEAKNESS

• WHY HAMID KARZAI CIRCULATED D.C. IN AN ARMOURED ‘CARAVAN’

• CAMERON COW-TOWS TO SARKOZY, STANDS UP TO MERKEL

• EUROPEANS TOLD THINGS THEY DIDN’T WANT TO HEAR

• MERKEL DEPLOYS HER COMMUNIST EXPERTISE TO PRESS FOR A NEW TREATY

• NEW U.K. GOVERNMENT FAILING TO ADDRESS CRUCIAL ISSUES

• ANNEX THE VAT TAX REVENUES TO THE TREASURY

• VAST, UNSUSTAINABLE COST OF BRITISH E.U. MEMBERSHIP

• 55% RULE REVEALS COALITION’S FEAR IT CANNOT OTHERWISE SURVIVE

• LIST OF ISSUES THAT NEED URGENT ATTENTION
BUT ARE BEING IGNORED BY THE COALITION

• COALITION INFESTED BY GERMAN ‘COMMON PURPOSE’ PSY-OPS

• SEVERE TENSIONS ALREADY WRACKING BOTH COALITION PARTNERS

ANNOUNCEMENT: 17 MAY 2010: INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW RELEASED WORLDWIDE
Outline details of this week’s release of International Currency Review are displayed in the second panel immediately below the NEWS panel on our Home Page. Also released are two further issues of Arab-Asian Affairs. Volume 33, # 5 of this title reveals how the Israeli authorities disguised the physical identity of David Kimche, the Israeli spymaster, drug controller and Director of the Israeli Foreign Office, even after his death, which took place on 8th March 2010.

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

• AS PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED, OUR LANDLINES REMAIN CLOSED BECAUSE OF UNLAWFUL U.S. HARASSMENT. WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL OR THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

THE REAL REASONS BEHIND THE ‘RESIGNATION’ OF ADMIRAL DENNIS C. BLAIR
On Friday 21st May 2010, Admiral Dennis C. Blair, the Director of National Intelligence, announced his resignation from the top US intelligence post. He gave no reason for his sudden departure in a public statement that he circulated to the 16 US intelligence agencies that he oversaw, and neither did he express thanks to President Barack Obama for the opportunity to serve under him.

In order to obfuscate the real reason for Blair’s de facto dismissal – Obama asked him to resign, or said he would accept his resignation – the White House and the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) have since been engaged in an operation to pull the wool over the eyes of the ‘mainstream’ media and the ‘Fifth Estate’ (the ‘Internet community’).

Specifically, to take the most mischievous report on this subject first:

• The Office of Naval Intelligence diversionary source labelled ‘By Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers’, item headed ‘Top US Spy Chief Quits After Obama Orders 2 Americans Assassinated’, consists of disinformation and lies. On about half a dozen previous occasions we have specifically identified the authors of this diversionary source as:

(1): Commander J. Forrest Sharpe, of Light in the Darkness Publications, based in Vienna, VA, Sharpe is ‘active duty submarine service fleet’, i.e. an Office of Naval Intelligence operative.

(2): D. L. O’Huallachain, of Irish extraction, who inter alia covers for the Vatican.

These reports typically begin with the ignorant fantasy: ‘Rumors circulating in the Kremlin today…’, notwithstanding that, as the veteran Editor of Soviet Analyst, your correspondent can reconfirm that the Kremlin ‘doesn’t DO rumours’. Even though we have repeatedly exposed this deception, certain US websites specialising in maximising the potential for confusion persist in deceiving the public by disseminating the disinformation perpetrated by this malicious ‘redirection’ source.

All ANONYMOUS reports are suspect: and because they are not provenanced, can and should never be relied upon. Sorcha Faal is a fabrication. Anyone recycling the diversionary claptrap spewed out by this US Intelligence Power ‘redirection’ source, is being grossly irresponsible.

• On 21st May, The New York Times published a piece by Mark Mazzetti which entered the fray by starting with the following diversionary lead-in: ‘An already strained relationship between the White House and the departing spymaster Dennis C. Blair erupted earlier this year over Mr Blair’s efforts to cement close intelligence ties to France and broker a pledge between the nations not to spy on each other, American Government officials said Friday’.

Although there WAS a French dimension to what happened (see below), this ‘line’, as presented, was clearly diversionary because, as we have repeatedly explained, France fronts for Germany under the ‘indissoluble’ bilateral Franco-German Treaty of the Elysée dated January 1963; and since the ‘Black’ criminal cadres inside the US Intelligence Power ‘work with’ the long-range pan-German Fifth Column that has attempted to ‘take down’ the United States in accordance with the Nazi slogan ‘We will build the Thousand-Year Reich on the Ruins of the United States’, there was never any need to ‘cement relations’ with French intelligence or to formalise a closer relationship.

In other words, this ‘line’ invented by the White House/CIA disinformation apparat deliberately turned the ‘actualité’ upside down, to bamboozle the readers of The New York Times and the domestic and international communities generally,

Interestingly, The New York Times’ elaboration included the following sentence: ‘Officials said the dust-up was not the proximate cause of President Obama’s decision to remove Mr [sic] Blair, who announced his resignation on Thursday, from the job as Director of National Intelligence’.

Quite right, it wasn’t.

On the contrary, the factors underlying Admiral Blair’s ‘resignation’ were as follows:

• Admiral Dennis C. Blair had been pressing for months for the release of the hijacked funds blocked by President Barack Obama.

• Admiral Dennis C. Blair ‘asked’ President Obama to release the hijacked funds forthwith, and Obama REFUSED. Obama then demanded Blair’s resignation, which was accepted.

• Admiral Dennis C. Blair had acquired COPY CHECKS proving that, as we alone reported, Vice President Joseph Biden, US Treasury Secretary Geithner, and Rahm Emanuel, the White House Chief of Staff, were and are receiving weekly and monthly bribery payments from the Bush-CIA Crime Syndicate, in exchange for their ‘solidarity’ in blocking the releases.

All of which, of course, PROVES that President Obama has been operating as George H. W. Bush’s corrupt poodle, carrying out his instructions to continue the sabotage and blocking of the payouts. Which is precisely what he did at 2:36 p.m. EDT on Thursday 20th May.

• UPDATE. 25th May: The Daily Telegraph reproduces the deliberately diversionary spin report referenced above, on page 15 of the London edition, in an article entitled: ‘US spy chief ‘was forced to quit in row over France”. Thus we have confirmation that The Daily Telegraph newspaper is apt to reproduce American official diversionary propaganda and gross distortions of the truth without investigating what lies behind them. This example also manifestly demonstrates that The Daily Telegraph doesn’t bother to read our reports. The intelligence cell resident in the Press Room (as in all key Press Rooms on both sides of the Atlantic) no doubt sees to it that this never happens.

• By contrast, we have a report from Shanghai confirming that our reports are now accessible throughout China with no impediments whatsoever, whereas a year or so ago they were only accessible in the main international hotels.

BIDEN TOLD WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF HE DOESN’T CEASE AND DESIST
It was made clear last week to Vice President Joseph Biden that if he continued with his sabotage, he would cease to be vertical in short order.

• UPDATE. 25th May: There are reports that the motorcades of both Vice President Joseph Biden and the former President William Jefferson Rockefeller-Clinton have recently been involved in accidents. Clinton’s van was hit on 24th May while he was en route to Yale to deliver a speech in which he decried the ‘birthers’ attacking Obama. Biden’s motorcade was involved in yet another accident a couple of weeks ago. We should have twigged, when reporting the earlier incidents of Biden’s road transportation being involved in accidents, that these episodes represent warnings of much worse to follow: viz. signals to the Veep (and Clinton) to cease and desist their sabotage.

It is also believed that a similar message was conveyed to President Barack Obama, although our intelligence on Biden is firmer. Close observers of ours have confirmed that, appearing in public, Biden appeared to be ‘visibly disturbed’. As well he might be.

Separately, the focus on France contained in The New York Times’ report was appropriate on purpose, indicating where a serious problem had arisen, but carefully not dealing with the actual issue – namely a French fraud associated with the releases, believed to have involved Pearce and the Bush CIA operative based in Dallas who was in touch with us for two and a half years until last January, when we basically outed him.

According to our latest information, these two veteran operatives were arrested. At all events, we are advised that ‘the French fraud has been dealt with’ – a major step forward, as we now know that the Dallas-based operative was spying on us on behalf of the Bush Financial Crime apparat all that time. There are unconfirmed hints that the aforementioned fraudsters were horizontalised.

OBAMA’S LIES TO THE HIGHEST BRITISH AUTHORITY EXPOSED
Although we cannot go into much detail, on Friday evening 21st May (or at the latest, Saturday morning) copies of the letters from Mr A. Clifton Hodges copied to us here and displayed in the preceding report were received at the highest level through our intermediary, addressed to the most senior official serving the Monarchy.

Combined with the package of materials that had been delivered by the same means on the morning of Gordon Brown’s resignation (see again below), the highest level in London now realised that the Obama White House had lied to them.

This will also have become apparent to the MI6 officers who thought last week (as we reported earlier) that everything was ready to go: which information, as we stated, was erroneous. It appears that the MI6 (MI9?) officers concerned realised, with our publication of Mr Hodges’ letters to the President, that they, along with the Palace, had indeed been lied to.

We understand that the beneficial equivalent of all hell breaking loose then ensued on Saturday.

UPDATE, 25th May: THE SARAH FERUGSON EPISODE:
ANOTHER OPERATION AGAINST THE BRITISH MONARCHY
In the past, we have briefly alluded to an operation run by the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) some time ago, in which a 24-year-old Italian-American was exposed as involved with one of Prince Andrew’s daughters while still a child. We commented that this represented a despicable covert US intelligence thrust to destabilise the Monarchy (one of many such ongoing underhand initiatives by the US Intelligence Power), by taking advantage of the dysfunctional state of affairs surrounding Prince Andrew and his former naive and guile-less wife.

The latest unfortunate episode involving Sarah Ferguson is another chapter in this sequence, albeit transacted by The News of the World, a dirty, scrurrilous Sunday newspaper owned by the dirty, scurrilous media mogul Rupert Murdoch, using a reporter of Pakistani origin, please note.

One dimension of the latest episode is that Prince Andrew has struck up close connections with the former Khazakh Communist Party Boss, Nursultan Nazarbayev, who is engaged in building a monstrous city largely designed by the pagan British architect Sir Norman Foster, which features a significant number of geomasonic buildings, including a colossal pryamid containing in-your-face masonic symbolism, and two buildings mimicking Jachin and Boaz, the pillars in Solomon’s Temple.

Nazarbayev glided seamlessly into the Bush Crime Syndicate orbit and has been photographed with George W. Bush, the implication being that the upgraded city being constructed with Khazakh energy and uranium wealth is intended to represent one of George Bush Sr.’s ‘thousand points of light’, meaning cities dedicated exclusively to the darkness. This is confirmed by the fact that Mr Nazarbayev changed the city’s name to Astana, being an anagram of the Russian for Satan, satana.

So the latest Fergie episode can be seen in this context to be yet another operation, handled via cutouts, to destabilise the Monarchy but in particular to discredit Prince Andrew, whose work has made serious inroads into a bailiwick that the Bush Crime Family thought they had all wrapped up.

The forthcoming issue of our intelligence publication Soviet Analyst has a detailed exposure of Astana and how Nazarbayev is squandering Kazakh wealth on sterile geomasonic power symbols.

THE CURSE OF STORY
At the top of our report dated 11th May 2010, we revealed (see also above) that US Vice President Joseph Biden, US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, and Rahm Emanuel, the White House Chief of Staff, are/were in receipt of weekly and monthly bribery cheques in exchange for their continued assistance to the Bush-CIA ‘Black’ apparat in blocking the releases which the White House has hijacked under both the Bush II and the Obama régimes.

As usual, and in accordance with their confusion-mongering and disinformation instructions, the flaky US websites magnifying the unprovenanced opinions of anonymous bloggers and thereby serving the obfuscation interests of the ‘Black’ apparat by specialising in maximising the fog of confusion to help protect the US kleptocracy from exposure (while maintaining an opposite self-righteous stance) ran off at once down rabbit holes with the historical Fritz Kraemer information, disregarding the sensational revelation concerning these highest-level bribees.

This is typical of these professional confusion-mongers: they are trained to pick up peripheral data and thereby to obfuscate the central issues that have been exposed. It’s called ‘redirection’.

Notwithstanding this typical ‘Black’ response, the curse of Story descended upon both the Bush and the Biden families with a vengeance following that posting. Specifically:

• Vice President Joseph Biden’s son Beau, Attorney General of Delaware, collapsed on the same day that we posted the revelation about Vice President Biden’s acceptance of these Bushbribes. One can speculate that the shock of learning that his father was at the receiving end of Payola – and more to the point, knowing how these people think, that this scandalous state of affairs had been exposed – may have been too much for the Delaware Attorney General, not least given his official status. After all, as we pointed out, and as every American schoolboy knows, acceptance of bribes while holding high office is an IMPEACHABLE OFFENCE. It remains to be seen whether what remains of the emasculated US Rule of Law kicks in here, or whether the preference will yet again be to brush this abomination under the filthy carpet at the Veep’s official residence.

• On 18th May, the brother of George H. W. Bush – William H. T. Bush, aged 71 – collapsed during an Annual Meeting of health insurer WellPoint Inc., held naturally in Indianapolis, thus bringing an abrupt end to a noisy meeting of discontented shareholders.

William Bush was transferred to the Methodist Hospital in Indianapolis. According to the de facto US State Information Agency, Associated Press, he was enduring a question-and-answer session with other directors when he moaned and leaned over to his right side.

Officials seized the opportunity to clear the room, leaving disident shareholders bewildered. The Associated Press report elaborated that ‘The insurer has received strong criticism from the Obama Administration and others for planning rate hikes of 25% or more for some of its customers. Several company critics attended the meeting’.

It is of course standard US intelligence practice to ‘check into hospital’ whenever the going gets rough, so it may be the case that this was a device to get the meeting closed down. However the circumstances strongly suggest otherwise. It will be recalled that Mr Biden’s ‘Black’ predecessor, former Vice President Richard B. Cheney, whom we believe to be ‘perfectly possessed’, was in the habit, from time to time, of checking into the hospital at the casualty entrance, and, after a polite interval, stepping into his limousine from a back exit from the hospital.

CHENEY’S ATTEMPT TO STEAL $2.0 TRILLION FROM BoA, ATLANTA
As reported here on 21st May, this same CIA criminal operative, former Vice President Richard B. Cheney, accompanied by Carlyle Group executives and thugs, appeared late on Wednesday 19th May at Bank of America, Atlanta, and attempted to steal $2.0 trillion from the funds allocated for the releases. Since precisely such a move had been anticipated by the Gold Badge Signatory (whose identity is revealed in Mr A. Clifton Hodges’ letters posted by us on 21st May), they were caught in flagrante and physically ejected from the bank.

These criminal thugs should have been cuffed and thrown face-down into the back of an armoured police van, and removed for immediate incarceration sine die pending indictment for attempted bank robbery. There is no indication as to whether such a sequel materialised, which is why we castigated the American law enforcement authorities as weaklings and cowards.

UPDATE, 25th May: CHENEY ET AL THEN TRIED TO CASH BOGUS CERTIFICATES IN PARIS
It transpires that Cheney, the Carlyle executives et al first tried to cash bogus gold certificates for $2.0 trillion at Bank of America, Atlanta. Then, over the weekend of 21st-22nd May, they attempted to cash the bogus gold certificates in Paris (‘the French fraud’). This operation failed, as well.

• What this demonstrates is that the official US criminalists are now DESPERATE, and essentially that ‘it’s over’. They have been exposed and caught in flagrante. Their entire edifice of corrupt operations is collapsing. These developments are of exceptional importance for the future.

CRIMINAL CIA OPERATIVE CHENEY WALKS AWAY FROM HIS ATTEMPTED BANK ROBBERY.
A BRIT GETS THREE MONTHS AND DEPORTATION FOR A MINOR TRAFFIC INFRACTION.
By contrast, a British contact of the Editor’s who had been resident for some time in the United States, reported to us on 22nd May, that, earlier this year, he was arrested and then jailed for three months for a minor traffic infringement.

On being released from the US Gulag, he was deported to Britain. This case illustrates the extreme skewing of the Rule of Law in the United States, which on the one hand allows notorious financial criminals like Mr Cheney to retire with apparent impunity from their latest attempt to rob Bank of America of $2.0 trillion on behalf of the Bush-CIA Crime Syndicate, while on the other hand jailing a Briton for three months for a minor traffic infringement, followed by deportation.

WHY DID THE CIA’S BANK PHYSICALLY EJECT CHENEY ET AL?
You way well ask: why were Cheney and his henchmen physically ejected from the bank, given that Bank of America is the CIA’s primary tame institution, and given further that the Director of Central Intelligence, Leon Panetta, has remained himself, as we have reported, engaged in the systematic blocking of the settlements (playing the familiar cynical game of shuttlecock with Mr Geithner and President Obama, each blaming the others, so that no progress is made – exactly the same tactics that were routinely used by Paulson, Cheney, Chertoff and the other odious scum of the earth that controlled the US structures under the corrupt President George W. Bush).

The question can only be answered generically. Inside a sack, rats attack other rats. Jealousy and hatred prevail and the thieves turn on each other. In the Atlanta context, it will be recalled that we have reported that further waves of bankers have been arrested since March, so one assumes that the bank officers at Bank of America, Atlanta, knew this and sensibly, for once, refused to go along with the Cheney-Carlyle heist on behalf of the Bush-CIA Crime Syndicate. Additionally, since the intended bank robbery was anticipated and the monies were heavily ‘marked’ electronically, the bank officers concerned would themselves have been thrown into jail or extradited to Europe by INTERPOL had they accommodated such an outrage.

More to the point, as the BoA heist was correctly anticipated, the intention may have been to catch these crooks in flagrante so that they can be arrested and indicted later. Americans and the whole world are crying out for the likes of Mr Cheney to be physically arrested in front of the world’s TV cameras. US associates of ours call for a much messier display to be televised, as we mentioned in the report dated 11th May 2010.

It is just (but only just) possible that what is preventing this from happening is a fear that such a display would publicise the depths of US decay, decadence and degradation – whereas the reality is that the televised arrest of a mastercrook like Cheneyscum would, on the contrary, immediately restore a degree of both domestic and external confidence that the American Republic can save itself from being completely destroyed by this corruption. But don’t ‘bank’ on it.

THE WORLD FELL APART WHILE THE CROOKS CONTINUED STEALING
As you can see, the whole world has been falling apart, with stock markets lending new meaning to the word ‘toilet’ – and yet these serial US criminals have continued to stonewall, bribe, hijack, lie, whine, writhe and wriggle their way as though there was no crisis and they were simply engaged in their usual non-stop scamming and stealing operations. (Remember, however, that what we report, though almost ‘real-time’, is in fact historical. Consider carefully what has just been said here).

Their objective is to stop the Dollar Refunding operation at all costs, out of jealousy and fear of ‘losing control’ (which is happening anyway) while repeatedly seeking to steal as much of the underlying real money they can grab hold of – just as happened in the Soviet Union from 1991 onwards. The very latest failed attempt at stealing funds was the thwarted ‘French fraud’.

• The fact that the finances of the world are crumbling daily before the crooks’ shaded eyes is of no concern whatsoever to these criminals.

They have been trying every ruse under the sun to steal real funds from the release monies: and of course we have only been able to report a few of these operations: the crass attempt to divert the funds via the serial thief and felon Wanta, Bush Sr.’s scamming facilitator and former courier, into a fake ‘virtual’ Central Bank of the non-existent Principality of Snake Hill, but in actual fact via the French Embassy thanks to the former French Ambassador to the United States, M. Levitte, who is now President Sarkozy’s top intelligence adviser. M. Sarkozy’s half-brother, ‘Oliver’ Sarkozy, is a senior executive with the Carlyle Group which sent executives with Cheney on the evening of 19th May to try to relieve Bank of America, Atlanta, of $2.0 trillion of the release funds.

Then there was the equally crass imposition of the Biden-linked Mafioso Salvatore R. DeFrancesco as ‘secretary’ on the complicit Pennsylvania Department of State Corporation Bureau’s screen for Pennsylvania Investments Inc., which we exposed and which resulted in the Gold Badge Signatory having to acquire bodyguards day and night.

Next, the CIA leaked a ‘fatwah’ against the Gold Badge Signatory, namely a formal execution order – a factor that may have emboldened that blockhead Cheney into assuming that he could safely risk the attempted heist at the Bank of America, Atlanta. Whether the leaking of this information formed part of a smokescreen generated by the Intelligence Power to sow further confusion, as we later surmised, has not really been clarified.

CRISIS AND CURE ARE EXCLUSIVELY RESULTS OF THE CRIMINALITY EXPOSURES
Yet despite all this (and the years of reportage on this crisis that preceded it), as you can also see, the dumb so-called ‘mainstream’ media have STILL not understood that the crisis is EXCLUSIVELY A CONSEQUENCE of the exposure of the endless financial criminality of the organised criminals who have long since hijacked and remain in charge of the US Government and structures.

• President Obama’s words are always smooth: but it is by his actions, or lack of action, that he is to be judged. And on that criterion, he has set himself up as simply yet another Bush-worshipping Financial Terrorist wearing the familiar garb of President of the United States.

Just how deep this culture of open-ended, unrestrained criminality has penetrated the American structures more generally, is confirmed, for instance, by reports of the free-wheeling operations of the Church of Satan inside the US military, which is said to be ignorant of, and indifferent to, the extreme dangers of the esoteric rituals and practices now prevalent in its ranks. One military wife has reported in detail on the satanic rituals her husband had to go through in order to secure advancement. In other words, he had to sell his soul to Satan if he wanted to continue his career.

Although this is simply indicative of the evil and corruption that has overwhelmed the US structures like a ghastly avalanche of sewage, any Government that thinks it’s OK to invade another country (Iraq) using depleted uranium shells, is manifestly bound to Satan anyway.

Iraqi doctors are reported to be outraged that cancer is spreading throughout the Iraqi population. Cancer rates in the Province of Babil have risen almost tenfold in just three years. Specifically, in 2004, 500 cancer cases were diagnosed there. Two years later, the figure had risen to 1,000. By 2008, the number of cancer cases in Babil Province had soared to 7,000.

• The situation there is now believed to be completely out of control.

The stupid British military, which goes along with US military abominations, or has done hitherto, reportedly also allows Satanists to practice their ‘religion’ inside its ranks. It is likewise complicit in the use of weapons of mass destruction, which is what depleted uranium shells undoubtedly are.

AS MI6 HAS JUST DISCOVERED, THE WHITE HOUSE LIES TO EVERYONE, EVEN THE QUEEN
The point of all this is that given the extreme darkness that has long since descended upon the Beltway and beyond, anyone (especially laid-back British intelligence cadres) who imagines that undertakings given by ANY component of the US structures can be relied upon, is in urgent need of brain surgery. As reported in our 21st May item, ‘London’ was telling its Stateside contacts on 20th May 2010 that everything was in order for the distribution – an assessment which was 100% inaccurate, indicating either that these people are not up to speed, or that they remain under the delusion that US official undertakings have meaning. They don’t. American official honour has been decimated by these organised criminals, and the sooner the complacent and opinionated British establishment recognises this basic reality, the better.

• They have now understood that they were lied to by the White House and the CIA.

Certainly, British officials do no service to The Queen by buying into the latest batch of lies spewed out by their corrupt American counterparts. If MI6 officers were in fact themselves lying, this would indicate that the gut-rot from the other side of the Atlantic is corroding their mental facilities, too.

Interestingly, when we put this possibility to a knowledgeable US source, he responded; ‘It doesn’t matter if they were lying. So what? The crisis is so out in the open now (among those ‘in the know’) that any lies are exposed almost the moment they are perpetrated’. True!

Our old rule of thumb – that public lies, like plutonium, have a half-life, and that their average life expectancy is seven years – appears no longer to be valid in this context. On the contrary, in the prevailing escalating chaos, an official lie is liable to be seen to be a lie – making it much harder for inveterate intelligence liars to get away with whatever dirty tricks they were trying to perpetrate.

THE CURSE OF GEORGE H. W. BUSH AND THE ‘EUROPEAN CRISIS’
George H. W. Bush’s dirty finger marks are to be found all over the ‘European crisis’ – up to and including, of course, the ‘French fraud’ that has just been stifled (see above) – arising from the free-wheeling Fraudulent Finance involving securitisation, which is illegal.

This is because, as previously revealed by this service, Citibank, based in Athens, handled counterparty derivatives transactions with elements of the Bush-Cheney Fraudulent Finance cadres, accumulating a vast portfolio of completely worthless ‘Trashets’ for which ‘good’ money (i.e. Euros) had been exchanged.

Like all derivatives transactions and trading contracts applicable under US law and in Common Law countries, all contracts entered into for an illegal purpose are by definition null and void – which means that more or less the entire universe of such derivatives transactions are in fact void, and can be challenged in court – a state of affairs that hasn’t arisen yet, since every residual party to this scamfest is hoping that such a meltdown can somehow be avoided.

But that is the ‘bottom line’: and even the bewildered organised criminal strategists know that the vast accruals that they have stashed offshore are intrinsically worthless, since they can no longer reveal ‘source of funds’ as required under the Basle banking requirements, without compromising themselves and facing inter alia charges of tax evasion.

This is because not only are these ‘earnings’ illegitimate, having involved inter alia tax evasion, but they are derived from contracts that are null and void because they were entered into for a criminal purpose. The Bush-CIA criminalist designers of these scams sought to export their Fraudulent Finance operations precisely because they are wholly illegal in the United States – whereas the participation, for instance, of corrupt Greek bankers at Citibank supposedly lent such illegal transactions ‘50% legitimacy’. We can now see where this careless assumption has led.

CITIBANK, ATHENS: LOCUS OF WANTA’S BUSH SR. ACCOUNTS
Citibank, Athens, was the locus of accounts set up by Bush’s former courier, the dual-named Lee/Leo Wanta – that Bush-protected criminal operative and scam-master, who stole a bona fide loan that got his probation shortened by five years and two weeks with the aid of his co-conspiring CIA Attorney, Steven Goodwin, of Richmond, VA.

In other words, instead of running a country, the previous Greek Government preferred instead (like Bush’s partners in Iceland, Ireland and elsewhere) to run a huge Ponzi scheme – squandering the nation’s liquid currency resources in exchange for what has turned out to be minus zilch.

GERMAN BANKS SCAMMED BY BUSH, WHEREAS STOLEN BUSH
AND GORBACHEV PROCEEDS ARE STASHED IN ST GALLEN, SWITZERLAND
Now the important point here is that Germany, Bush Senior’s closest collaborator, is in the same boat in this respect as Greece: its big banks (Deutsche Bank, Commerzbank, Dresdner Bank) are reportedly stuffed to the gills with worthless ‘Trashets’, given not least that Frau Angela Merkel – the former Secretary of the Agitation and Propaganda Department of the Young Communists at Marx-Lenin University, in case you had forgotten – has been acting as Bush Senior’s ‘gatekeeper’ in Germany, a.k.a. agent supervising the Bush Crime Family’s business in German institutions.

It appears, though, that the tangible fraudulent Bushwealth has been stashed in Deutsche AG, formerly Barrington Investment Group, of which the partners are, also in case you had forgotten:

• George H. W. Bush, former President of the United States.

• Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachëv (Orbach), former President of the Soviet Union and before that, head of the all-powerful CPSU Administrative Department, which rôle he has long since resumed, operating from a large wing in the Kremlin.

Gorbachëv’s version of the World Revolution is in full swing, and the ignorance of many Americans on this score (we have been told that the new generation can’t even remember who Mr Gorbachëv was) is intolerable. Gorbachëv is BEHIND THIS MESS: wake up!

• Dr Helmut Kohl, former Chancellor of Germany, whose unsavoury ‘Black’ background has been partially re-exposed by this service.

• Dr Josef Ackermann, CEO of Deutsche Bank AG.

BEHIND AGITPROP SECRETARY MERKEL’S ‘EURO IN DANGER’ PLOY
Bush’s agent and former Communist agitprop operative (STASI), Frau Merkel, has made what the British would call ‘a right pig’s ear’ of the ‘Euro crisis’ arising EXCLUSIVELY as a consequence of Germany’s own self-indulgence in Fraudulent Finance transactions, replicated inter alia in Greece.

• Essentially, the Germans have been caught at their own corrupt game: and they are in a panic. Equally panicked are the French, who allowed Banque Paribas to accumulate over 3,000 Bush Sr.-linked accounts, handled by Barbara Bush’s Pearce relative.

As we pointed out earlier, the Germans care not a Greek iota for the plight of Greece. No. What concerns the STASI operative at the top in Germany is the prospect of the COLLAPSE OF THE GERMAN HEGEMONY PROJECT.

• Specifically, Frau Merkel told the Bundestag on 19th May 2010:

‘This challenge is existential and we have to rise to it. The Euro is in danger. If we don’t deal with this danger, then the consequences for Europe are incalculable’.

‘If the Euro fails, then Europe fails’..

However what the former Communist agitprop secretary failed to remind the Bundestag was that sober observers had warned right through the 1990s and especially in 1998 that the attempt by Germany to impose ‘irrevocable exchange rates’ (as provided for under the Maastricht Treaty) on ancient economies which had developed quite separately from Germany, would end in disaster as soon as a really serious ‘shock’ – such as has occurred following ‘Greece’ – materialised.

For instance, we ourselves incurred much unpopularity from the likes of the Bank of England and the brainwashed National Bank of Belgium for warning, in successive articles that we published in International Currency Review, that the EU’s Collective (Common) Currency System contained the glaringly obvious seeds of its own destruction.

In those days, no-one took the slightest notice, and most observers thought we were nuts. Peter Jay, the former British Ambassador to Washington, published an article which drove home our points, but that made no difference either.

So the blatant hand-wringing, pleading for mercy, Teutonic reactions and other predictable and cowardly displays of a growing realisation that the whole confounded pan-German ‘European project’ is indeed doomed to failure, cuts no ice whatsoever in this office.

On the contrary, the perpetrators of this foolish and arrogant scheme are facing what we predicted they would ultimately face: the collapse of their hegemony project, followed by the chaos that Frau Merkel fears. Once again, the Germans, as is their wont, have overplayed their hand.

FORMER BUNDESBANK PRESIDENT DID NOT DENY IN 1998 THAT GERMANY
MAY HAVE HOARDED DEUTSCHEMARKS IN ANTICIPATION OF THE EURO COLLAPSING
Not that Germany itself failed to anticipate such an outcome. On the contrary, as we have also reported on several occasions, the former President of the Bundesbank, Dr Hans Tietmeyer – now running the super-corrupt Vatican Bank on behalf of his German Jewish Papal Master, and looking after the Bush-related accruals held there – refused to answer a key question put to him at a press conference attended by one of our colleagues in 1998. The question was this (paraphrase):

‘Dr Tietmeyer, has the Bundesbank taken the precaution of printing and storing adequate supplies of Deutschemarks for distribution should the Euro system disintegrate in the future?’

As indicated, Dr Tietmeyer did not pooh-pooh this question. He didn’t deny that the Bundesbank had taken such a sensible precaution. He just refused to answer the question. The implication is that the Bundesbank has adequate supplies of deutschemarks in stock for the eventuality finally acknowledged by Frau Merkel, which could be distribuited very quickly.

GREECE SHOULD HAVE TURNED DOWN
THE GERMAN MONEY AND RESTORED THE DRACHMA
So, reverting to Frau Merkel’s statement that ‘the Euro is in danger’, the critical point underlying this observation is as follows. Germany has provided a substantial sum of ‘good’ money in loans to help ‘bail out’ Greece (on a temporary basis). Which means that Greece has to pay this money back with interest (somehow).

If Greece were to extract itself suddenly from the Collective Currency, its replacement drachma would naturally be sharply devalued against the Euro – which would leave Greece in an even worse situation, as it would have to repay the Euro-denominated loans with devalued drachmae.

Which means as follows:

• Number One: Greece is caught and can never get out of its bind, short of its entire external debt being written off. Presumably Frau A. Merkel took the risk that, in order to ‘save’ the pan-German hegemony project, the funds allocated for Greece would ultimately be lost: in which case language is not available to describe the cynicism of this move.

• Germany, having reacted in knee-jerk fashion in order to ‘protect the Euro’ has realised that, as Angela Merkel has pronounced, ‘the Euro is indeed in danger’ because Greece’s situation (to be replicated in Portugal, Spain, and Italy, for starters) is now irretrievable.

• The Greeks should have got out of the Collective Currency system straight away, turning down the German loan. A de facto default would be a better option than where they are now.

BUT THERE IS ANOTHER DIMENSION WHICH, DESPITE WHAT WE HAVE PUBLISHED, HAS SO FAR BEEN COMPLETELY OVERLOOKED. CONTRACTS ENTERED INTO FOR AN ILLEGAL PURPOSE ARE NULL AND VOID. Therefore, what the Greeks should have done, if they had had their wits about them, was to declare all the fraudulent transactions conducted mainly through Citibank, Athens, VOID, thereby cancelling the fraudulent debts unilaterally, which they are entitled to do on this basis.

By repudiating the fraudulent debt on this sound legal basis and specifically making it clear that the underlying contracts, entered into under the previous Greek Government, are VOID, they would perform two key functions: first, they would ‘get out from under’; and secondly, they would hasten the total collapse of the entire fraudulent derivatives sector, which is happening anyway, doing us all a favour. By acknowledging the validity of the debts, the Greeks have made a fatal mistake. All those debts are null and void because the underlying contracts were entered into for an illegal purpose. Surely there are lawyers in Greece capable of understanding this.

Even at this late stage, the Greeks should repudiate the debts on this sound legal basis, and send the foreign and German money back with a note saying:

‘Thanks, but on second thoughts. no thanks’.

U.S. SENATE BLOCKS IMF PAYMENTS TO DEBT SPIRAL COUNTRIES
On top of all this, the US Senate voted 94-0 during the week ending 21st May 2010 to preclude the International Monetary Fund from deploying funds to countries (such as Greece) that are trapped in a debt spiral. Since the IMF is effectively these days just a branch of the White House, this could prevent the IMF from providing its own component of the grandiose European bail-out package trumpeted in the preceding week by the Europeans – a tranche amounting to about one-third of the total bail-out aggregate of about $1.0 trillion.

The stupid Brussels and Berlin apparatchiks, whose product is always ‘more regulation’, imagine that the way out of this intractable mess of their own willful bureaucratic making is more and more regulation, supervision of national budgets before presentation to national legislatures, and like administrative measures which do not relate in any way to market pressures. Their delusions will quickly be exposed, and the universal expectation is for a rapid descent into fragmentation.

The European Union Collective is by definition so bureaucratic and cumbersome that it cannot in reality coexist with modern electronic financial markets at all. That’s why the Euro is doomed.

PAN-GERMAN POLITICAL HEGEMONY PROJECT UNRAVELLING
In other words, the German geopolitical hegemony project that was elaborated by the Hitler Nazi élite in 1942, and promulgated via ‘Europäishe Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft’ (European Economic Community), released in Berlin in 1942 by publishers Haude & Spenersche Verlagsbuchhandlung Max Paschke, one copy of which is held by the British Library and another at the Staatsbiblithek, Berlin, is poised to fall apart at last.

• The chapter headings of this Nazi tome correspond almost precisely to the main headings of the Maastricht Treaty, indicating an unbroken continuity of strategic thinking and intent on the part of the long-range pan-German planning intelligentsia, which the STASI agent Merkel serves.

In response to this realisation, Frau Merkel and the Brussels gravy-train apparat, headed by Herman Van Rompuy, President of the European Council (who owes his position to a concerted operation by France and Germany to block the candidacy of Tony Blair), are attempting in vain to leverage the imminent ‘catastrophe’ to their advantage – stressing the ‘need’ for revisions of the Lisbon Treaty to lock further tight restrictions into the system so that Germany and its ever more fractious ‘partner for all eternity’ (as under the January 1963 Treaty of the Elysée), France, can somehow ‘impose discipline’ on the recalcitrant peripheral EU ‘Member States’ – conveniently forgetting that France and Germany are both in grave breach of the rules generally, and of the requirements of the EU’s so-called ‘Stability and Growth Pact’ in particular.

Underlying all this is the ridiculous Teutonic and, it has to be said, revolutionary Talmudic, notion that every facet of economic, social and political life can be ‘regulated’. Regulation is the essence not only of Talmudic thinking, but also of its product, Communism.

On the face of it, it would appear that those of us who have opposed this German Euro-trap from the outset, and whose lives have been wasted trying to do our best to derail it, may find that we won’t need to do much more – as the chances of it collapsing from within can even be seen to be high by brainwashed EUdolaters themselves.

• They chose to disregard the warnings proffered by this service and others: so, as far as we are concerned, they are faced with the consequences of their own stupidity.

Various UK journalists are panicking that a collapse of the Euro will severely affect Britain, on the basis that 50% of UK exports are delivered to the Eurozone. This statement is inaccurate, as the proportion of UK exports is skewed by long-standing fiddling of British energy data and other factors. British exports to the Eurozone will continue with the restoration of national currencies, amid a likely regional competitive devaluation environment.

9/11: MORE DOCUMENTED ‘SMOKING GUN’ INTELLIGENCE
It may be recalled that we have previously cited two sources of intelligence indicating that the 9/11 atrocities – in which 12,000 people died in the Twin Towers demolition operations alone, not the officially estimated 3,000 – were known about well in advance of the ‘Reichstag Fire’ event.

Specifically:

• Both here and more extensively in our publication Soviet Analyst, we have long since exposed the ‘Prison Letter’ scrawled by the since incarcerated Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) Lieutenant Delmart ‘Mark’ Vreeland, dated June 2001. He identified the intention and summarised the official policy as ‘LET ONE HAPPEN. STOP THE REST!!!’.

In March 2005, the Pentagon-linked operative Demchuk (a.k.a. Walker) informed the Editor of this service that ‘Vreeland is in solitary confinement for a very long time, his case is sealed, and he’s no longer a threat to you’ – which was nice to know, as Vreeland had threatened the Editor with death in May 2003 after the Editor had refused to carry out his ‘instructions’ to disembark from a train from Niagara Falls en route to New York City, after we had interviewed him in Niagara Falls (Canada).

• During that experience, Vreeland scammed the Editor’s VISA card of the equivalent of £1,600, having apparently read the numbers of the card upside down when the Editor was paying the hotel bill in Niagara Falls after two days of interviews with this Illuminati split ONI personality.

Delmart E. Vreeland (his correct name) was arrested in October 2004 after trying to scam a gas station by means of Credit Card fraud. On 22nd October 2008, he was sentenced on 12 counts under case Number 04CR706 and as of March 2010, his ‘Current Facility Assignment’ was Buena Vista Correctional Complex, run by the Colorado Department of Corrections, DOC Number 143539. As he is known to have opened one diplomatic bag that he had couriered from Moscow (treason), no doubt one of the counts covered that offence, although paedophilia was also involved. His estimated parole eligibility date is 2nd March 2100.

• We have revealed that one reason the dual-named operative Lee/Leo Wanta, Bush Sr.’s courier, was held in jail was that he knew about the impending 9/11 ‘Reichstag Fire’ operation, and there was concern that his disaffection at the way he had been treated under both Clinton and Bush II, might lead him to expose the conspiracy. About ten days after 9/11, all of a sudden, Mr Wanta was miraculously released, and was collected from jail by the AUSTRIAN Gerald Salchert and taken to a family residence in Wisconsin.

Now, a document has surfaced which clearly reveals that certain US cadres KNEW ABOUT 9/11 IN ADVANCE. The document in question, dated December 2001 (but see below) was entitled:

‘Homeland Defense and the Transportation Industry:
The Civil Aviation and Surface Transportation Sectors’.

‘A report on a seminar-workshop on Homeland Defense held in Denver, Colorado on October 30, 2001, sponsored by the Denver Council on Foreign Relations (DCFR), the Inter-University Seminar on Armed Forces and Society (IUS), Rocky Mountain Region, the Intermodal Transportation Institute (ITI) at the University of Denver (DU), and the Institute on Globalization and Security (IGLOS) at DU’s Graduate School of International Studies’.

• Additional information displayed on the cover of the report:

‘This report was prepared by Greg Moore with the earlier help
of colleague rapporteurs at the University of Denver, Graduate
School of International Studies: Michael Opheim and Martin Wayne’.

Denver Council on Foreign Relations
denvercouncil@hotmail.com

On page 4 of this document is found the following sentence:

‘In the last meeting (May 2001), participants discussed Washington and New York
as the most likely targets, even discussing a scenario in which a plane is hijacked
and crashed into a high-value target’.

So, the Council on Foreign Relations knew, in May 2001:

• The exact two cities that would be attacked.

• The exact method of attack.

• The precise type of target that would be attacked.

It would be interesting to know whether any of the participants that that meeting had heard of Misprision of Felony. Certainly Mr Wanta, who was all for us promoting Misprision of Felony to buttress his false case before he performed the usual ‘switch’ twin of the ‘bait’ trap on us, has heard of it. He could be jailed on that single count – leaving aside his Fraud in the Inducement vulnerabilities, including the fraudulent loan arrangements that he concocted with his corrupt CIA lawyer Steven Goodwin, of Richmond, VA (born in Düsseldorf) to defraud the Editor of this service of his $35,000 loan plus interest, and his theft of those and other funds.

REPORT FROM LONDON: ‘NICK, NICK, THE QUEEN EXPECTS ME TO GO’
The new British Government has one advantage: it isn’t the corrupt Brown Government. The Conservative-Liberal Coalition exists not only because the post-election mathematics precluded any alternative arrangement, although Brown thought for a time that this was possible; but also because Brown was expected to leave office, not only by the people, but more to the point, by The Queen. Confirmation of this seeped into the public domain in an investigative round-up report published in The Sunday Times on 16th May.

In that report, Brown, having received a message from the Palace on the morning of Tuesday 11th May asking when he would be going to tender his resignation to Her Majesty, is reported to have phoned the Liberal Democrat leader, Nick Clegg, to say:

‘Nick, Nick, I can’t hold on any longer. Nick, I’ve got to go to the Palace. The country expects me to go. The Queen expects me to go. I can’t hold on any longer’.

This information represents what Gordon Brown told Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democratic leader, verbatim, having been reported by a photographer who was allowed into Downing Street to record what were expected to be Brown’s final days in Downing Street.

The Queen expected Brown to go, and he went. As soon as Brown had taken leave of The Queen, the corrupt nexus established between Tony Blair and George W. Bush, and continued by Gordon Brown, disintegrated. This axis had been responsible for sustaining the sabotage of the releases for years, and was the bedrock upon which the arrogant Paulson, Cheney, Geithner and their co-conspiring companions confidently sustained their opposition and constant destabilisation of the releases required under the Basle List restitution arrangements.

DOCUMENTS PREVIOUSLY BLOCKED BY BROWN (ON BEHALF OF GEORGE W. BUSH)
DELIVERED AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL IMMEDIATELY AHEAD OF BROWN’S RESIGNATION
Now earlier on the morning of 11th May, information and documents, under cover of a letter from Mr A. Clifton Hodges, the lawyer representing Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., his US corporation Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., and his London-based corporation Cottrell Securities Limited, had been delivered at the highest level to Buckingham Palace. The package of documents contained covering letters from the Editor of this service addressed to a known official at the Palace dating back 18 months and to June 2009. It is believed that the official may have been contacted to ask whether she had been aware of these documents. When the answer was in the negative, it may have been realised that the previous deliveries had been diverted to Downing Street – Brown’s Downing Street, that is – indicating with crystal clarity that Brown had suppressed the necessary information that had needed to be conveyed to Buckingham Palace. This, therefore, is the main significance of The Sunday Times’ report that Brown told Clegg: ‘The Queen expects me to go’.

• Of course this indicates that Mr Brown may have deliberately frrustrated the resolution of the financial chaos for which his mishandling of the country’s finances was responsible.

NEW UK GOVERNMENT RUSHES TO INGRATIATE ITSELF ABROAD: A SIGN OF WEAKNESS
Almost immediately on taking power, after the formation of the new Cabinet, the Prime Minister and his Foreign Secretary, William Hague, started rushing all over the place to meet other leaders. The first person David Cameron went to see was Alex Salmond, no longer represented in the House of Commons, in Edinburgh. Salmond’s objective in life is to break up the United Kingdom.

Next, Mr Cameron received, on 14th May, the Afghani drug controller, President Hamid Karzai, and posed for press photographs showing him shaking hands with this operative, who had stopped over in London on his way back from Washington. A Downing Street spokesman said that Cameron and Karzai discussed President Karzai’s ‘very successful’ visit to Washington.

WHY HAMID KARZAI CIRCULATED D.C. IN AN ARMOURED ‘CARAVAN’
However a correspondent of ours based inside the Beltway reported to us at 21:02 hours UK time on 14th May 2010 that on Wednesday and Thursday 12th-13th May, Mr Karzai was conveyed around Washington with an immense armed caravan, as large as that employed by the President of the United States (POTUS). Our source stated that :

‘… at one point when trying to cross the 14th Street Bridge yesterday (13th) into DC at about 5 p.m., my friend called me counting 62 cops on motorcycles accompanying 12 vans filled with personnel sitting behind darkened windows, and a couple of marked FBI police cars’. The correspondent added that such activity hadn’t been observed inside the Beltway for some considerable time.

None of this was reported in the satrap American ‘mainstream’ media, so that no deductions from this ‘in-your-face’ display of arrogance have been made. So it’s down to us, as usual. Why is such overt protection necessary? Is it mandatory to have acquired an advanced degree in logic to work out that it is CRIMINALS, ESPECIALLY DRUG DEALERS, THAT NEED PROTECTION – whereas, as a rule, NON-CRIMINALS DON’T? If both parties weren’t up to their necks in organised drug crime, they wouldn’t need protection on this scale when moving around DC, would they?

These people are drug traffickers. As you can see from the completely different state of affairs in Britain, ‘normal’ holders of high office don’t need this exaggerated level of protection. This reality is so glaringly obvious, it’s almost laughable. And yet nobody in the so-called ‘mainstream’ media has highlighted this obvious reality. Of course not: the US ‘mainstream’ media is itself extensively subsidised by dubious sources of Fraudulent Finance.

CAMERON COW-TOWS TO SARKOZY, STANDS UP TO MERKEL
After that, Cameron rushed to Paris to cow-tow to the fractious President of France, Nicolas Sarkozy, whose half-brother ‘Oliver’, is a senior executive with the Carlyle Group, Bush Sr.’s notorious money-laundering enterprise – executives from which accompanied the top CIA crook Richard B. Cheney when he attempted to relieve Bank of America, Atlanta, of $2.0 trillion in the evening of 19th May (see above and the preceding report).

Cameron then repaired to Berlin, to meet the former Secretary of the Agitation and Propaganda Department of the Young Communists at Marx-Lenin University, a.k.a. Bush Sr.’s erstwhile agent, Frau Angie Merkel, in Berlin. There he did at least distinguish himself by countering Frau Merkel’s agitation for yet another collective treaty designed to enable the pan-German Government to claw back its hegemony project from the edge of oblivion.

Specifically, he told Merkel that ‘any treaty – even one that just applied to the Euro area – needs unanimous agreement of all 27 Member States, including the UK which of course has a veto’.

He added that ‘there is no question of agreeing to a treaty that transfers powers from Westminster to Brussels. If there was a treaty that proposed that, obviously it would be subject to a referendum’.

EUROPEANS TOLD THINGS THEY DIDN’T WANT TO HEAR
Meanwhile the new Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, discovered for himself how the European agenda constantly intervenes and confuses the diaries of British Ministers. On 18th May, he had to travel to Brussels, where he was confronted with more arrogant demands by the criminal enterprise European Commission for funds to facilitate a 6% increase in EC spending, which would evidently imply a £600 million increase in Britain’s annual contribution – which, as reiterated below, is completely illegal because the European Commission is a criminal enterprise, and it is a criminal offence for taxpayers’ funds to be remitted into the hands of a criminal enterprise.

Earlier, during the hiatus between the collapse of the Labour Government and the emergence of the peculiar phoenix Coalition, the former Chancellor, Alistair Darling, had refused to sign up to the European ‘support fund’ on the perfectly proper grounds that the Brown Government had lost the election, so that caretaker Ministers had no powers whatsoever other than the handling of very low-level, routine administrative matters.

Deliberately missing the point here, this ‘defiance’ was met with an outburst of hostile responses from Britain’s charming ‘partners’ in the European Union Collective, led by France, Sweden, and the Brussels apparat itself. The theme was that the British should not bother asking the European Union Collective for assistance when it runs into irretrievable financial difficulties (indicating, by the way, that Brussels is no more ‘up to speed’ with the Dollar Refunding Programme solution than the British Coalition Government).

A character called Jean-Pierre Jouyet, Chairman of the French Financial Services Authority, pontificated with emphasis on 11th May that only ‘God would help’ Britain, as it had snubbed its Eurozone ‘neighbours’. This nasty piece of work then elaborated:

‘Help yourself and Heaven will help you. If you don’t want to show solidarity with the Eurozone, then let’s see what happens to the United Kingdom’.

Yes, let’s!

MERKEL DEPLOYS HER COMMUNIST EXPERTISE TO PRESS FOR A NEW TREATY
As a former Communist Party (STASI) apparatchik trained in the methodology of Communism, Frau Merkel knows of course the procedure: it is to convene conference after conference, meeting after meeting, and to sponsor document after tedious document, in a never-ending and sterile process of accretion. Every conference sets the timetable for the next conference (something that may not have happened with the Lisbon Treaty, which the Eurocrats imagined would be the last: but the Communist Merkel knows better).

Under the Leninist overt ‘settlement’, with which this Communist STASi apparatchik is familiar, no document was ever sacrosanct, no undertaking to be relied upon. On the contrary, as Lenin taught from the outset, all undertakings with the ‘bourgeoisie’ could be reneged upon at any tick of the clock, with absolute revolutionary impunity.

So now you may understand why the duplicitous behaviour of the US Financial Terrorists holding high office is described by this service is quintessentially Leninist. No undertaking they have ever given, at any stage of the crisis, has been reliable – something that, as noted above and in the preceding report, certain MI6 officers, being of a younger generation, may still not understand.

Leninist operatives go through the motions of negotiating and reaching agreement with ‘the bourgeoisie’ (proxy for their opponents) with the specific, knowing intent of reneging on their undertakings when what Lenin called ‘the correlation of forces’ changes in their favour.

Clearly, David Cameron doesn’t yet understand this, despite his acknowledged brilliance (his Oxford Professor, Vernon Bogdanor, has called him ‘the most brilliant student I ever taught’).

And nor, it seems, does William Hague, the new British Foreign Secretary, who flew straight to Washington into the arms of Mrs Hillary Clinton – who has been closely associated with criminal operations and the blocking of the releases since longer than we can remember.

From his body language, it looked to us as though Hague had no clue about the issues discussed and exposed by this service, i.e. had not been briefed.

COALITION WORKING PARTIALLY IN THE DARK
A similar deduction is permissible from perusal of the various convoluted statements, accords and undertakings vouchsafed to date by the new Coalition Government. A vague expectation of some economic improvement surfaces in some of Cameron’s observations, but the focus is on the truly horrendous condition in which the British financial economy, and the Government’s finances, were left by the outgoing Labour Government.

Now your correspondent has lived long enough to know that every single Labour Government that has been in power in Britain has made an irretrievable dog’s dinner of the country’s finances: so the fact that Brown spent his last six months in office approving irresponsibly permissive spending plans, many opposed by his civil servants, comes as no surprise. All sorts of superfluous contracts were signed during this period which the new Government will find hard to unravel.

When you consider that Brown (and Blair) were directly implicated, in cahoots with the Bush Crime Family and subsequently with the corrupt Obama Administration, in the endless sabotage of the releases – and therefore of the G-7-approved Dollar Refunding Programme using the sovereign loan, which would deliver windfall tax receipts into the British as well as the US Treasuries – you may begin to understand the reckless treachery for which Brown was responsible.

• No wonder he received a phone call from the Palace on the morning of 11th May.

So far, the Coalition Government has been working on the assumption that severe tax increases and public spending cuts are indispendable, without taking account of the windfall accruals that will arrive at the British Treasury once the delayed and hijacked Dollar Refunding Programme gets under way. Our working assumption must be that no-one in the new Cabinet has yet been briefed on the implications of the Dollar Refunding Programme. That may or may not reflect the continued sabotage perpetrated by the corrupt US Financial Terrorists exposed inter alia by this service: which, we repeat, the controlled ‘mainstream’ media on both sides of the Atlantic have continued to ignore – missing huge news stories such as the episode on 19th May when Mr Cheney, Carlyle executives and henchmen were physically ejected from Bank of America, Atlanta.

• If that is not a colossal news story, your correspondent has to be advised what is.

As previously stated here, we don’t care whether the complacent ‘mainstream’ wakes up or not. It’s too late for them to catch up: but the fact that the media have failed to inform their readers of what has been going on behind the scenes represents a gigantic failure by the Fourth Estate which has no doubt exacerbated the ongoing collapse of newspaper circulations.

To recap for a moment. You will recall that in July 2007, we reported that Lord ‘Eddie’ George, the former Governor of the Bank of England, was arrested and briefly jailed. You will also recall that we had reported that Alan Greenspan, the former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, had been arrested, incarcerated for three weeks, and then released. We republished all this information in International Currency Review. Lord George died in April 2009. We did not receive a letter from Lord George’s lawyers, and neither did we hear from Dr Alan Greenspan’s lawyers, either.

Anyone who’s not sitting on their brains should be able to deduce from the foregoing that the reports were accurate, which they were. Earlier this year we learned the actual reason for Lord George’s arrest. He had facilitated the stealing of The Queen’s gold (29th-30th March 2007), which we alone reported, converting the ‘product’ into worthless pieces of paper.

As late as when we were reporting that late night meeting at the Bank of England dated 9th April, which was supposed to have ‘taken care’ of the situation, we were authoritatively informed that this matter had still not been resolved. Although it had been decided to send over massive funds for the releases at that meeting, we later discovered that sensible second thoughts had prevailed and that the funds were not sent over – either because of some Bank of England corruption or glitch or, more probably, because of a consuming lack of trust.

NEW U.K. GOVERNMENT FAILING TO ADDRESS CRUCIAL ISSUES
The new Coalition Government has ignored the following facts:

• That all legislation passed by the Westminster Parliament since 2000 is null and void as the ejection of the hereditary peers was performed illegally: see our report dated 10th April 2010.

• That the continued remittance of Value Added Tax payments to the European Commission is illegal, as the Commission is a criminal enterprise, the annual accounts of which have not been signed off and approved by the Court of Auditors for the past 14 years running. Mr John Craig of the UK Serious Fraud Office has confirmed to a former Member of the European Parliament that it is a criminal offence for taxpayers’ funds to be remitted into the hands of a criminal enterprise. Therefore if the new Government continues this practice it will de facto be engaged in criminal activity: see the Editor’s speech given in London on 31st October 2009:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jug-W-DKcms
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lB18PIYbSYw&;feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJyUKbmBeJs&;feature=related

ANNEX THE VAT TAX REVENUES TO THE TREASURY
The immediate partial solution to the Government’s financial problems is to annexe the taxation accruals which cannot legally be remitted to Brussels (see above) into a special Treasury account. This could be an escrow account for a defined period, during which the British Government would require the European Commission to reverify all its accounts going back 14 years, a process which will need to extract full details of all corrupt procedures leading to the arrest and prosecution of the perpetrators. This laborious task would need to be performed year by year to the satisfaction of the British authorities, and within the stipulated time period.

Failing such a response by the European Commission to the satisfaction of the British authorities, the VAT accruals held in the escrow account should be transferred to the UK Treasury’s general accounts and used to defray and pay off debts incurred by the Coalition’s profligate predecessor.

There is absolutely no indication that anyone in official circles understands the basis and logic of this, which means that the new Coalition Government will be just as prepared as its predecessor to commit criminal offences on a continuing basis by remitting British taxpayers’ funds into the hands of a criminal enterprise. Ministers can be arraigned for such criminal activity.

Meanwhile the Coalition brought forward an extremely feeble agenda which it represented as the compromise agreement, and republished on 20th May (having previously promulgated a different programme). The programme, to have been announced in part in The Queen’s speech on Tuesday 25th May, represents the lowest common denominator and reveals that this is an excessively weak Government – even though headline-catching prospective Bills have been indicated.

VAST, UNSUSTAINABLE COST OF BRITISH E.U. MEMBERSHIP
Indicative of the extreme collective stupidity of the British political and bureaucratic Establishment is the fact that, having delegated General Powers to the European Commission – after the model adopted by Herr Hitler in January 1933 when he prevailed upon the Reichstag to delegate General Powers to his Cabinet, which he then annexed to himself – the huge costs imposed by the corrupt criminal enterprise called the European Commission are actually crippling British business.

When the country is bust, the Government’s finances are in total disarray, and the Government can’t even understand that it is committing an ongoing criminal offence by remitting UK Value Added tax accruals to the Brussels parasites, the colossal burden imposed by this unelected, unaccountable fake EC ‘authority’ represents a calculated insult to normal intelligence.

Specifically, the British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) publishes a ‘Burdens Barometer’, compiled by the London and Manchester Business Schools, using the Government’s own figures. The latest report from this source, released on 23rd May, indicates that the total cost of compliance with the European Commission’s nit-picking regulations to British business over the past 12 years alone has reached £88.3 billion, an increase of more than £11 billion over a year ago, although this is due in part to new information relating to burdens imposed by the European Commission via the British satrap Westminster Parliament in earlier years. During 2009, the additional EC cost exceeded £1.0 billion, consisting of 40 new restrictions.

One of the most expensive of these EC-originated laws is the EU Light Duty Vehicle Emissions Standards, which imposes recurring annual costs on businesses of £1.48 billion. It is to be noted that such penal financial burdens would not ‘fly’ had it not been for the subversive ‘Green agenda’ propaganda, which, as Mr Mikhail S. Gorbachëv predicted, has been one of the most ‘successful’ revolutionary tools ever developed by the World Revolution élite. Gorbachëv basically kicked off the Green agenda when he sat on his backside for three weeks in 1986 after the deliberately provoked Chernobyl disaster, to observe its impact on Western attitudes.

The most expensive burden of all the Talmudic restrictions imposed by the European Commission via the compliant satrap Westminster Parliament since 1998 is reported to be the Working Time Regulations, which have so far cost British businesses £17.8 billion, and also a 2000 EU Pollution Directive, which has cost British businesses £10.4 billion to date.

What infuriates this service is the complacency with which such information is received in British policymaking circles. The message which no-one in the weak Establishment wants to hear is that membership of the European Union Collective has been IMMENSELY DAMAGING for Britain and its economy, and that total independence will yield far more positive results.

Because once Britain has extricated itself at long last from this long-range geopolitical entrapment mechanism, every country in the world will be knocking at Britain’s door asking for a bilateral treaty guaranteeing access to the huge British marketplace. The idiocy of delegating General Powers to an unelected, unaccountable, corrupt criminal enterprise cannot be over-emphasised (and actually is so glaringly obvious that it shouldn’t even need reporting): but the Establishment doesn’t want to know, because of course pointing these grim things out reveals just how stupid, complacent and negligent its cadres have been for decades.

55% RULE REVEALS COALITION’S FEAR IT CANNOT OTHERWISE SURVIVE
That the Coalition lacks confidence in its ability to survive is separately confirmed by the fact that the Coalition intends to proceed with its constitutionally irregular provision that there is to be a dissolution threshold of 55% of the votes in Parliament for a no-confidence motion in the context of previously unheard-of fixed-term parliaments (for five years). [A surreptitious lobbying operation to promote fixed-term parliaments has been infesting Westminster for a long time: so this wheeze is NOT the Coalition’s original notion, but one it has ‘lifted’ to enhance its chances of survival].

Under this format, if the Coalition Government loses a vote of confidence, it then invokes the dissolution provision and because MPs will want to hang on to their seats (not least because the Government is also proposing to redraw constituency boundaries to reduce the number of MPs – another cynical control ‘gimmick’ designed to keep it in power), the dissolution provision fails: which results in what has been described as a ‘zombie government’.

It is glaringly obvious that this ‘belt and braces’ arrangement has been cobbled together precisely because the Coalition partners recognise that they and their supporters remain, in fact, at serious loggerheads over a wide range of issues, and that without such unconstitutional arrangements (which will be rendered ‘constitutional’ by a Commons vote supported by all the new MPs who can’t believe that they were elected), the Coalition would fall apart. Hence, the new Coalition’s bravado represents actually a gross piece of self-serving deception ‘justified’ by the grim arithmetic of the General Election held on 6th May, which, as predicted, resulted in a hung Parliament.

We have already demonstrated that the Conservatives could have secured a working majority (of about 40 seats) had they accommodated the requirements of actives who detest Britain’s sterile relationship with the European Union Collective. Here are the details again, for the record:

Calculations based on votes cast prepared by the former MEP for South-East England, Ashley Mote, have revealed as follows:

• The Conservatives could have had a comfortable working majority if they had made an unequivocal commitment to a referendum on British membership of the EU.

• The UKIP (United Kingdom Independence Party) vote, favouring a much harsher policy towards Britain’s sterile EU participation, would have collapsed and, while not every one of the 25 seats listed below might have been delivered to the ‘Conservatives’, they would have emerged with a working majority of about 40.

In the following table of constituences where the ‘Conservatives’ came second, the first number shown represents the winner’s majority, and the second number shown represents the UKIP vote:

Bolton West 92, 901
Derby North 613, 829
Derbyshire North East 2445, 2636
Dorset Mid 269, 2109
Dudley North 649, 3267
Great Grimsby 714, 2043
Hampstead and Kilburn 42, 408
Hull North 641, 1358
Middlesbrough South 1677, 1881
Morley and Outwood 1101, 1506
Newcastle-Under-Lyme 1552, 3491
Norwich South 310, 1145
Oldham East 103, 1720
Plymouth Moor 1588, 3188
Rochdale 889, 1999
Sheffield Central 165, 652
Solihull 175, 1200
Somerset and Frome 1817, 1932
Southampton and Itchen 192, 1928
St Austell and Newquay 1312, 1757
St Ives South 1719, 2560
Swansea West 504, 716
Walsall North 990, 1737
Walsall South 800, 1711
Wirral South 531, 1274

Additionally, the Conservatives should have won Wells, which was lost to the Liberal Democrats with a majority of 800. But the UKIP vote was 1711; so including the promise of a referendum on Britain’s continued sterile membership of the EU could have secured this seat as well.

The Guardian reported on 8th May 2010 that ‘UKIP’s bid to beat the Speaker’ (who is traditionally unopposed by the main parties) in Buckingham, ended in third place. Lessons for the Conservative right, there, perhaps, if they think they can win by tacking to the extremes’.

But the data displayed above reveal that this assessment is the very reverse of the truth. If the ‘Conservatives’ had accommodated the known preferences of adherents of the United Kingdom Independence Party, they would have achieved a comfortable working majority and would not have found themselves on the edge of a deep abyss.

LIST OF ISSUES THAT NEED URGENT ATTENTION
BUT ARE BEING IGNORED BY THE COALITION
Among the gimmicks proffered by the Coalition is the idea of a bonfire of nit-picking laws and regulations implemented under the disgraced Labour Government.

These in fact reflect the hegemony of the Brussels apparat over the House of Commons, since 80% of legislation spewed out by the European Commission, which enjoys Hitlerian General Powers to initiate legislation, are derived from this unelected, unaccountable, corrupt ‘authority’.

Meanwhile there is no sign that the Coalition cares, or has a clue, about the issues that really matter, which include the following:

• Repeal of legislation mimicking the iniquitous provisions of the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which allows IT platform providers to host breaches of copyright by third parties, and to refuse to remove the same until the ownership of the copyright and rights is proven by the owners. This loophole enables copyright material (such as our books, for instance) to be downloaded onto such platforms and for an unknown quantity of illegal copies to be made until such time as the copyright owner becomes aware of the breach and initiates the procedure to compel the platform controller to remove the offending posting.

In our case, whole copies of some of our books have been illegally downloaded with the copyright page deliberately and maliciously removed in order to disguise the ownership of the copyright. This loophole is costing British publishers millions every year: we ourselves have lost book sales (at full price) valued at over $2.0 million due to this abomination. There is no indication at all that the ‘enlightened ones’ running the new Government have a clue about this issue.

In addition, the former MEP Ashley Mote, has usefully highlighted the following Labour legislation which needs to be abolished. This list is augmented by the Editor’s own contributions:

• Civil Contingencies Act 2005.

• Criminal Justice Act 2003.

• Extradition Acts 2003 and 2006 (containing the iniquitous imbalanced provisions favouring extradition of Britons to the United States, but impeding the extradition of Americans to Britain).

• Firearms Act 1996 and 1997 (which have led to sharp increases in violent crime in UK cities).

• Health and Safety Act 1997.

• Hunting Act 2004.

• ID Cards Act 2006 [this IS included in the Coalition’s agenda.]

• Legislative and Regulatory reform Act 2006.

• Police and Justice Act 2006.

• Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

• Terrorism Act 2005

During its 13-year ‘reign of terror’, the disgraced Labour Government passed over 500 new Acts of Parliament – six on immigration, eight on terrorism, 12 on education, 11 on health and social care, and 25 on criminal justice. Most of these new Statutes were enacted in response to the previous Government’s EUdolatry – i.e. to comply with new European Commission Directives.

• None of these laws, including the Quasi-Non-Government Organisations (quangos) they created, has improved the quality of life in the United Kingdom.

The following measures would be adopted if the new Government were not arguably the feeblest manifestation of governance ever to have emerged onto the British political stage:

• All British primary law based on European Commission Directives, including Human Rights, Health and Safety, Regional Assemblies, Data Protection, Race Relations and innumerable other scatterbrained, Talmudic nanny-state provisions imposed by the corrupt European Commission in conformity with its pan-German hegemony ‘General Powers’ control remit.

• Abolition of all busy-body entities, legislation and unaccountable and unelected agencies of Government responsible for the enforcement of nit-picking provisions dictated by Brussels which routinely intermeddle in people’s lives.

• Abolition of all organisations, such as ‘Common Purpose’ (funded of course by Deutsche Bank: see below), including quangos which seek to change and manipulate the way people think.

• Abolish the Local Government Standards Board which enables officials to complain when elected councilors criticise them.

• Abolish all targets for hospitals, schools and the police, the effect of which has been to divert effort away from their real purposes in order to ‘avoid trouble’ from the Government.

• Any surviving quangos would have to be made liable under the Harassment Act 1997 to individuals faced with oppressive intrusion into their lives.

We further agree with Ashley Mote that the following additional measures are urgently required (in which the Coalition has shown not the slightest interest):

• Employment: Restore the right of employers to employ the best candidate for any job.

• Health: Restructure hospital managements so that doctors’ clinical judgments and patients‘ needs come first. Doctors and nurses should decide. Managers should manage. Restore matrons and their powers to manage wards.

• Criminal Justice: Immediate restoration of Habeas Corpus and the protection of British law whenever a foreign country seeks extradition of a British national. The prima facie case against him or her must be heard and decided by a British court.

• Public Services: Restore British ownership of ALL essential public services and protect our vital national interests using Mrs Thatcher’s famous golden share principle. There can be no foreign majority ownership of essential British utilities. (Instead of which the country’s essential assets are passing at breakneck speed into European hands, as always intended under the Nazi compendium Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft: see above).

• Farming: Restore the right of British farmers to grow whatever they like.

• Fishing: Prohibit all foreign fishing vessels in a 200 miles area around UK coasts

• Defence: Restore spending on defence to at least five per cent of total public spending to ensure that the armed forces have the capabilities and resources to defend the country.

• Note: In this context, the new Minister of Defence, Liam Fox, backed by the Foreign Secretary, William Hague, is operating on the right lines. On 22nd May, he flew to Afghanistan to investigate the acceleration of the repatriation of British troops (so that British will no longer be complicit in America’s dirty drug war designed to control, not eradicate, the heroin trade).

• Fox has also made it clear that British military deployments will in future be governed strictly by British national interests.

• The significance of this is as follows. As previously discussed in these reports, the British military has irresponsibly allowed itself to become co-opted and hijacked to fulfil the squalid requirements of an internationalist agenda – that is to say, British troops have been dying in pursuit of an agenda that has nothing to do with the interests of the British people and nation.

Liam Fox appears to have understood this: and if he hasn’t, he has at least recognised that there is no way that British military force can continue to be rented out to the internationalists.

Secondly, Mr Fox cites British national interests, illustrating yet again the abject confusion that reigns at the heart of the British political Establishment over Europe. Under the political collective régime, satrap ‘Member States’ HAVE NO INTERESTS, because their national interests have been collectivised (there remain a few exceptions to this, but that is the reality).

• This is a truth that the political class simply cannot grasp, or doesn’t understand (because it doesn’t begin to realise that the European Union Collective is, precisely, a collective entrapment mechanism). Fox has clearly not grasped this reality yet.

• Migration: Re-establish a clear difference between economic migration and genuine pleas for asylum. Britain should accept its share of genuine refugees but without necessarily offering British nationality. The UK Immigration Service should be focused on identifying and completing genuine cases within one month, using tough and fair criteria.

• All visa applications to be made from abroad. No visa, no travel.

• Abolition of the Foreign Office’s recruitment cadre in Pakistan which operates on a quota basis – that is to say, the staff have quotas of would-be immigrant Pakistanis that they must meet. This operation is clearly subversive, a scandal, and should be folded forthwith.

• Limit work permits to essential workers only. No right to benefits.
‘Support yourself and your families or leave’.

• Encourage the return of immigrants to their own countries.
‘Be a part of the British way of life or leave’.

• Deport all illegal immigrants and convicted criminals not born in the United Kingdom. Encourage voluntary repatriation. Abolish the iniquitous interference derived from European Human Rights legislation whereby, for instance, a known dangerous terrorist cannot be extradited because extradition would breach his human rights.

• The Overseas Development Budget: The coalition has ring-fenced this permissive source of official expenditure which could and should be cut down to the bone.

Specifically, it proposes to ‘guarantee’ that the equivalent of 0.7% of Gross Domestic Product will continue to be allocated to overseas development. This is complete, idiotic madness. The ONLY territories for which Britain should continue to provide assistance are British Overseas Territories.

Former colonies that preferred independence are on their own, as they made their choice and must live with the consequences. At a time when the Government’s finances have been decimated by the ravages of the preceding incompetent régime, to ring-fence overseas development is sheer perverse delinquent madness.

Overseas Governments accustomed to receiving British assistance should be told in no uncertain terms: ‘The British people are having to suffer because of our financial predicament, and we have a much greater responsibility towards the British people than we have to you. In fact we don’t have any responsibility towards you at all: what we have done in the past represents donations pro bono publico. There isn’t any money to permit any more generosity on the part of British taxpayers, not least because you never thanked us for a single penny we remitted to you in the past’.

Of course the weasel argument against such a stance would be that if British aid dries up, then other powers will step into areas where Britain has had influence in the past. To which our sharp answer would be: our ongoing studies of the consistency with which the United States has stabbed its ‘closest ally’ in the back economically since the Second World War, make it clear that British aid hasn’t displaced such below-the-radar hostile operations on the part of Washington. And the same applies to other so-called ‘allies’. So get real, and stop living in your own dream bubble.

COALITION INFESTED BY GERMAN ‘COMMON PURPOSE’ PSY-OPS
A clue as to why not much, if any, of the above absolutely necessary and overdue reforms will take place under the Coalition Government emerged on 13th May, when The Daily Telegraph reported that ‘the first meeting of David Cameron’s new Coalition Cabinet had ended with Ministers hailing the ‘common purpose’ of the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats.

Michael Gove, the new Education Secretary, and an intelligence operative, commented:

‘It was great, actually. I think we had a really constructive meeting. I was delighted by the sense of partnership and common purpose that we had there’.

As previously reported, ‘Common Purpose’ is an extremely subversive targeted mind-control and personality change Fifth Column operation financed by Deutsche Bank, which was surreptitiously run for many years from the office of the Deputy Prime Minister under the now discredited Labour Government, John Prescott. It runs intensive brainwashing courses for ignorant cadres from the police, the military, the National Health Service, welfare, local government, the judiciary, the legal profession and other segments of influence-building society, often resulting in early marriage or personality breakdowns as participants are subjected to the ‘tabula rasa’ Psy-Ops approach and assaulted with crass, dumbed-down, politically ‘correct’ notions.

It is this Fifth Column subversion operation which is directly responsible for the decay of standards right across the board, and for substituting upside-down thinking – such as that homosexuality is acceptable and it is a gross offence to criticise it. On that score, the dumbed-down participants are of course not reminded what homosexuals actually do to each other.

In other words, ‘Common Purpose’ uses known psychological warfare manipulation techniques to brainwash stupid components of the upper levels of society, at the participants’ massive expense of course, into junking their ‘old values’ and replacing them with the garbage, back-to-front values which lead to such outrages as victims of burglary being arrested rather than the burglar. This is a deliberate, controlled, German-funded subversion programme. The repeated use by new Coalition Ministers of the words ‘Common Purpose’ is extremely disturbing, especially as it is believed that David Cameron has himself been brainwashed by this Fifth Column Psy-Ops agentur.

SEVERE TENSIONS ALREADY WRACKING BOTH COALITION PARTNERS
Meanwhile in the House of Commons, fractures on both sides of the Coalition are the main talking point, and have been receiving extensive press coverage. One veteran MP informed The Sunday Telegraph (23rd May) that the atmosphere prevailing among Conservative backbenchers generally was ‘worse than at any time since Maastricht’ in 1992 – code for the reality that the atmosphere is ALREADY POISONOUS. A clumsy attempt by Cameron to ambush the backbench 1922 Committee in order to bring this forum for backbenchers’ dissent under Cabinet control has seriously backfired, fuelling resentment among Conservatives already dissatisfied with the wholesale emasculation of the Conservative platform and with intended measures such as the proposed increase in capital gains tax to 40% and the scrapping of a Conservative plan to raise the threshold for Inheritance Tax from £350,000, above which level 40% tax must be paid, to £1.0 million.

A sign of the unscrupulous nature of the Coalition’s arrangements was an uncalled-for remark by the new Home Secretary, the bossy Theresa May, who suddenly pronounced that she ‘no longer’ opposed the adoption of children by homosexual/lesbian couples. In other words, the woman has no fixed principles at all, sways with the wind, and accommodates her ‘views’ to meet the pragmatic requirements of the moment. Since the Home Office is the third most important Office of State, this is hardly an indicator of prospective principled governance.

On the Liberal-Democratic side of the equation, the relegation of the impressive Dr Vince Cable, to the position of Business Secretary, where he has had to deliver £900 million of ‘cuts’ already to the Chancellor, George Osborne, is described by observers as ‘an eruption waiting to happen’. Cable, who thought he might wind up as Chancellor of the Exchequer, is being further cut down to size by Osborne, who was intending to appoint Sir Samuel Sassoon, shortly to be ennobled, as Commerce Secretary in the House of Lords – a sure recipe for idiotic turf warfare. Innumerable other ripples of discontent have surfaced, the tawdry ensemble of which in our view suggests that it is entirely possible that this enterprise will, contrary to currently received opinion, suddenly collapse.

• An indication that the Coalition is not averse to dirty tricks, either, surfaced on 19th May, when the Coalition presented its ‘final’ feeble version of what had been agreed.

Dr Vince Cable waited for ages to get to the microphone, but found himself mysteriously entangled with the mike and its connecting cable, so that he had to ad-lib: ‘As the new head of the department for technical innovation, we make it up as we go along’. No. What probably happened is that a dirty tricks operative made sure that when he reached for the mike, the connecting cables had been pre-entangled to maximise his embarrassment in front of the media. The Conservatives don’t like Cable because of his previous close association with the Labour Party.

There is also much anger at ‘grass roots’ level, with the 600,000 ‘workers’ who knock on doors on behalf of the Conservative Party reportedly angered that they wasted their time, as the Coalition’s political platform has little to do with what they promoted on the doorstep.

Additionally, the arrangement whereby opposition parties receive what for some reason is known as ‘Short’ money, amounting to £2.0 million in the case of the Liberal Democrats, is now denied to the relatively impecunious Lib-Dems, who would therefore be in trouble if another General Election were to have to be held any time soon.

All in all, therefore, contrary to the propaganda and spin, the UK political situation seems to this veteran observer to be highly unstable.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

THE FOLLOWING DATA HAS BEEN PUBLISHED AT THE FOOT OF MOST OF THESE REPORTS FOR THE PAST THREE YEARS++: COMPILED BY U.S. SECURITIES EXPERT MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S..

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
NOTICES:

BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time AMENDING AND INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE. In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

REAL-TIME INTELLIGENCE ON THE HIJACKED RELEASES

cropped-chrisstory

THREE LEGAL LETTERS ADDRESSED TO PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA

Friday 21 May 2010 02:00

• CHENEY THROWN OUT OF BANK OF AMERICA, ATLANTA, IN THE LATE EVENING OF 19TH MAY, AFTER TRYING TO STEAL $2.0 TRILLION FROM THE RELEASE FUNDS

• PANETTA AND GEITHNER PHYSICALLY CONFRONTED ON 20TH MAY BY INTERPOL

• THEY WHINE, WINGE, WRIGGLE AND BLAME OBAMA FOR BLOCKING THE PAYOUT RELEASES

ANNOUNCEMENT: 17 MAY 2010: INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW RELEASED WORLDWIDE
Outline details of this week’s release of International Currency Review are displayed in the second panel immediately below the NEWS panel on our Home Page. Also released are two further issues of Arab-Asian Affairs. Volume 33, # 5 of this title reveals how the Israeli authorities disguised the physical identity of David Kimche, the Israeli spymaster, drug controller and Director of the Israeli Foreign Office, even after his death, which took place on 8th March 2010.

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

• AS PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED, OUR LANDLINES REMAIN CLOSED BECAUSE OF UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT. WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL OR THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

THE EDITOR IS URGENTLY CONTACTED BY MR A CLIFTON HODGES
At 22:22 hours on the evening of Thursday 20th May 2010, the Editor of this service received the following communication from Mr A Clifton Hodges, counsel for the CMKM/CMKX SEC scam victims and who also represents Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., and his two corporations, Pennsylvania Investments, Inc, and Cottrell Securities Limited, London.

The email was also sent to our special contact with the British Monarchical Power, which received a detailed package of information under a covering letter from Mr Hodges at Buckingham Palace on the morning of 11th May 2010. Shortly afterwards, Gordon Brown resigned and David Cameron was received of The Queen and confirmed as Prime Minister.

Those events dissolved the linkages between the Bush Fraudulent Finance nexus and the Blair-Brown Government, which had impeded settlement for years.

Mr Hodges’ communication states:

‘I have attached several letters which I have recently had occasion to have delivered to the President of the United States. They are, I believe, self-explanatory as to what continues to take place in this land, which continues to frustrate the completion of distribution of the World Global Settlements. These Settlements, of course, include monies for the US Dollar Refunding Project as an integral portion. [Editor: The Line Item on the Basle List].

I believe the British Monarch needs to be aware of the exact cause of the continued delay in concluding this matter. It lies squarely in the White House in Washington, DC.

Your cooperation and assistance is hereby solicited; please ensure that Her Majesty and other interested Monarchical parties, are advised of the circumstances which pertain. To that end, please feel free to make as much use of these letters as may in your sole discretion be required.

Best regards, Al.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

WE REPRODUCE BELOW THE COMPLETE TEXTS OF THE THREE LETTERS – DATED 14TH, 19TH AND 20TH MAY 2010 – SENT BY MR HODGES TO PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA.

These letters provide definitive, up-to-date, detailed, ‘real-time’ information on the PRECISE state of the Settlements and the Group of Seven-approved US Dollar Refunding project based on the sovereign loan fund. You cannot obtain better ‘real-time’ data than is contained in these letters.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

BUT FIRST, PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING INTELLIGENCE :
Before we reproduce the letters, which contain detailed information about the continued wriggling of the serpent (the coarse skin of which is tatooed with swastikas), the following HORRENDOUS FACTS ILLUSTRATING THE LENGTHS TO WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS WILL GO, are stressed:

• While all the preceding information – including the weekly and monthly bribes being received by Vice President Joseph Biden, US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, and Rahm Emanuel, the White House Chief of Staff (see our report dated 11th May 2010) – remains intact, the new ‘real-time’ information contained in these legal letters confirms that:

• President Barack Obama is personally BLOCKING the Settlements and is accordingly describable as a Financial Terrorist who is personally holding the world to ransom. If that is NOT the case, then Geithner and Panetta have LIED to INTERPOL to that effect [see below].

• Obama is also lying to The Queen and to the Chinese authorities/parties. This reality has been confirmed to us by the fact that ‘London’ stated on both 19th and 20th May 2010, to relevant US contacts, that the Settlements payments are ‘complete’. It is assumed that these wholly inaccurate communications from the British reflected assurances from the White House, from the US Treasury, or the CIA, or all of the above. If London is still inclined to accept American official ‘assurances’ at face value, it clearly remains complacently and pathetically way behind the curve.

• At all events, President Obama is therefore acting on the familiar obstructive instructions or in conformity with the requirements of the criminal former Presidents Bush Sr., Bush Jr., and Clinton whose notoriety worldwide as Financial Terrorists requires no further emphasis here.

• The object of the exercise is to keep the funds bottled up with Bank of America, so that they can be stolen. Why do we state this with absolute certainty? Because:

• Former Vice President Cheney, a top criminal CIA operative, entered the relevant Bank of America office in Atlanta late on 19th May 2010, accompanied by a posse of thugs and executives from the Bush Sr.-linked Carlyle Group, and attempted to extract $2.0 trillion from the Settlements funds. Our sources confirm that former Vice President Richard B. Cheney and his henchmen were PHYSICALLY THROWN OUT OF THE BANK.

The inside source ANTICIPATED that an attempt to steal a huge volume of funds would take place, and had ensured that the funds were electronically ‘marked’ so that when the expected attempt to steal the funds materialised, the perpetrators, led by Cheney, would immediately be identified and caught in the act. These criminal operatives should have been thrown out of the bank into the back of armoured police vans. Did this happen? We don’t know, but doubt it.

• Nowadays, bank robbers are liable to be shot on sight. What is wrong with the Americans? They stagger around the world intermeddling in the affairs of other countries as though they own the entire globe, and yet they lack even the guts to deal with the recalcitrant organised criminals who control their own Government. This perverse combination of cowardice and arrogance shows what a rotten condition the American Republic has fallen into. WEAKLINGS! COWARDS! FOOLS! IDIOTS!

• Both Leon Panetta, Director of Central Intelligence, and Timothy Geither, the bribed US Treasury Secretary, were physically confronted by INTERPOL on 20th May and told to cease and desist from all further interference and blocking of the releases. Both operatives whined, winged, wriggled and bleated that they had approved everything and that the matter was in Mr Obama’s court.

This of course is yet another repetition of the familiar pass-the-parcel ‘collective’ gimmick, where everybody blames everybody else and nobody is responsible. However these two dark characters were sufficiently concerned to point the finger definitively at President Obama, making it crystal clear that the President of the United States himself is holding the world to ransom, and lying to The Queen and the Chinese authorities. It is also likely that, as we have suggested before, Obama is being blackmailed (by Panetta), and probably threatened (or his family is being threatened), as the Bush thuggists have done in the past (see earlier report).

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

THE HODGES LETTERS CONTAIN DETAILED INTELLIGENCE ON THE RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
The letters from Mr Hodges, which have also been made available for the benefit of the 50,000 CMKM/CMKX victim shareholders, are reproduced verbatim below. Since the CMKM/CMKX suit is a class action, Mr Hodges is obliged to keep his 50,000 victims informed as the crisis evolves.

In other communications, Mr Hodges elaborates: ‘I took this action because the British Monarch is as anxious as many Settlement payees to have this matter resolved; accordingly, she is an ally and needs to be kept up to date regarding what’s actually transpiring’.

• Note the BCC detail at the end of each of the three letters to President Obama.

The Editor was well advanced with a separate report on parallel developments of great importance, but will follow through with that report a little later.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

(1): LETTER DATED 14TH MAY 2010 FROM MR A CLIFTON HODGES TO PRESIDENT OBAMA:

HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
A Professional Law Corporation

A Clifton Hodges
James S. Kostas
Donald W. Ricketts*

*Of Counsel

4 East Holly Street
Suite 202
Pasadena CA 91103

Tel: (626) 564 9797
Fax (626) 564-9111

May 14, 2010

MOST URGENT

VIA FACSIMILE ONLY (202) 456-2461

Honorable Barack Obama
President of the United States of America
Whitehouse
Washington, D.C.

Dear Mr. President:

I write to you this morning because people within your current administration continue to frustrate dissemination of the World Global Settlements; I am advised today that Mr. Leon Panetta, the DCI, participated in this act on May 14, 2010. I represent some 50,000 shareholders who are to be paid a settlement which consists mainly of monies collected from banks, brokerages, hedge fund corps, market makers, the Depository Trust Corporation/Federal Reserve, and various billionaire “naked-shorter” individuals, as well as some monies due from the SEC for damages.

These various monies collected have been held far longer than they should have been, and were swept into the World Global Settlements, thereby delaying payment even further. Taxes were paid into the U.S. Treasury due on these “Settlements” on December 30th and 31st; distribution of these settlement funds could not legally be withheld past midnight of February 14th, 2010.

The continued holding of these settlement funds results in the violation of more laws such as “banking fraud,” “trust fund violations,” and, in times of war, “International Financial Terrorism.” These charges are not at the discretion of the government to overlook in the name of withholding monies that are not its property, nor its right to hold – especially given that now the Treasury is in “DEFAULT” and owned in large part by the Chinese government.

I am aware you have issued an “Executive Order” giving the diplomatic parties of Interpol, the Chinese, the Swiss, and the U.K. (MI6), the means to enforce, with all due power, dissemination of the “Settlements.” They clearly are relying on your power to assist this effort and to stop cabinet members of your staff and CIA factions from blocking the Global World Settlements.

They are relying on you to exhibit your inherent Presidential character such as integrity and respect for the law, and to recognize the gravity of delaying such an important event intended to rescue not only the immediate US banking community, but to support a recalibration and refitting of various currencies and economies on a world scale necessary to abate the global collapse of economies everywhere.

Honorable Barack Obama
President of the United States of America
May 14, 2010
Page Two

We are all well aware of the “derivatives,” the Ponzi schemes of the Federal Reserve creating debt out of thin air, the real estate debacle of SIV’s and CDO’s, the “Naked Shorting” in the stock market, and the market’s overall vast manipulation for the profit of the few.

The global economy needs these “Settlements” to initiate recovery, and to switch to the new asset-backed US Treasury dollars.

Mr. President, the people elected you for reasons of your promises, your apparent integrity, your conviction to help the American people uphold justice, and to return this Nation to its pre-eminent world status. Please use your good offices to ensure these “Settlements” are disseminated without further delay.

Sincerely,

HODGES AND ASSOCIATES

[Signed] A. CLIFTON HODGES

ACH/gm

Cc: Lindell H. Bonney, Sr.
Clients
Bcc: Michael Cottrell

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

(2): LETTER DATED 19TH MAY 2010 FROM MR A CLIFTON HODGES TO PRESIDENT OBAMA:

HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
A Professional Law Corporation

A Clifton Hodges
James S. Kostas
Donald W. Ricketts*

*Of Counsel

4 East Holly Street
Suite 202
Pasadena CA 91103

Tel: (626) 564 9797
Fax (626) 564-9111

May 19, 2010

MOST URGENT

VIA FACSIMILE ONLY (202) 456-2461

Honorable Barack Obama
President of the United States of America
Whitehouse
Washington, D.C.

Dear Mr. President:

I write to you again this morning because your immediate assistance is required to ensure prompt dissemination of the World Global Settlements.

As I have previously stated, I represent some 50,000 shareholders who are to be paid a settlement which consists mainly of monies collected from banks, brokerages, hedge fund corps, market makers, the Depository Trust Corporation/Federal Reserve, and various billionaire “naked-shorter” individuals, as well as some monies due from the SEC for damages.

These various monies collected have been swept into the World Global Settlements, resulting in a substantial payment delay.

I am currently advised and understand the following:

• A portion of the World Global Settlement funds have been collected and are presently held in the custody of a Richmond, VA bank.

• Said funds are sufficient to cover all disbursements to be made by the authority of one Lindell H. (Bill) Bonney, Sr., the Paymaster.

• Mr. Bonney has spent more than eight weeks over the past three months, in Richmond, for the purpose of consummating these transfers.

• Mr. Bonney has, at the direction of the Pentagon, London, et. al., recently returned to Richmond to consummate the transfers and is standing by to do so.

• Mr. Bonney has been, most recently, directed to complete his monetary transfer duties by the conclusion of this date; again, he is standing by to do so.

• Mr. Bonney was advised this morning, by the referenced bank, that the bank could not allow the transfers to be made until authority was received directly from the White House.

• I am advised that you have previously given written approval of these transfers; accordingly, I am not aware of any further basis for delay.

Honorable Barack Obama
President of the United States of America
May 19, 2010
Page Two

I am persuaded by the above facts, that only your direct intervention will be efficacious in bringing this matter to conclusion. Mr. President, please provide your authority and direction to those who continue to frustrate completion of these World Global Settlements

Mr. President, the people elected you for reasons of your promises, your apparent integrity, your conviction to help the American people uphold justice, and to return this Nation to its pre-eminent world status. Please use your good offices to ensure these “Settlements” are disseminated without further delay.

Sincerely,

HODGES AND ASSOCIATES

[Signed] A. CLIFTON HODGES
ACH/gm

Cc: Lindell H. Bonney, Sr.
Clients
Bcc: Michael Cottrell

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

(3): LETTER DATED 20TH MAY 2010 FROM MR A CLIFTON HODGES TO PRESIDENT OBAMA:

HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
A Professional Law Corporation

A Clifton Hodges
James S. Kostas
Donald W. Ricketts*

*Of Counsel

4 East Holly Street
Suite 202
Pasadena CA 91103

Tel: (626) 564 9797
Fax (626) 564-9111

May 20, 2010

MOST URGENT

VIA FACSIMILE ONLY (202) 456-2461

Honorable Barack Obama
President of the United States of America
Whitehouse
Washington, D.C.

Dear Mr. President:

I write to you again this morning because your immediate personal assistance is required to ensure prompt dissemination of the World Global Settlements. As I have previously stated, I represent some 50,000 shareholders who are to be paid a settlement which consists mainly of monies collected from banks, brokerages, hedge fund corps, market makers, the Depository Trust Corporation/Federal Reserve, and various billionaire “naked-shorter” individuals, as well as some monies due from the SEC for damages.

I have also been involved in the representation of other payees awaiting this distribution and have, in such capacity, been in direct communication with the UK Royal Monarch.

I am currently advised and understand the following:

• A portion of the World Global Settlement funds have been collected and are presently held in the custody of the Bank of America in Richmond, VA.

• Said funds are sufficient to cover all disbursements to be made by the authority of the Paymaster who has now spent more than eight weeks over the past three months, in Richmond, for the purpose of concluding these transfers.

• The Paymaster authority has, at the direction of the Pentagon, London, et. al., recently returned to Richmond to consummate the transfers; he was advised yesterday morning at Bank of America that the bank could not allow the transfers to be made until one additional signature was obtained.

• Accordingly, on May 19, 2010 an agent of Interpol began a hand-carry trip through Little Rock, Arkansas, to Charleston, South Carolina, and then on to Richmond, Virginia; the hand carried item was presented to the Bank of America officer this morning.

Honorable Barack Obama
President of the United States of America
May 20, 2010
Page Two

• The Bank of America officer then advised the Paymaster authority that Mr. Leon Panetta had instructed Bank of America that no World Global Settlement funds were to be disbursed without express personal approval from the President of the United States.

• I have previously been advised that you had given specific written authorization of these transfers when you visited the Richmond Bank of America several weeks ago.

As I advised yesterday in my communication to you, I am persuaded by these facts, that only your direct intervention will be efficacious in bringing this matter to conclusion.

Mr. President, please provide, once again, your specific written authority and direction to those who continue to frustrate completion of these World Global Settlements. I would very much appreciate your written confirmation that you will do so without delay; accordingly, I will withhold further communication to the UK Royal Monarch and distribution of this correspondence to my clients until 4:30 PM EDT today.

Mr. President, the people elected you for reasons of your promises, your apparent integrity, your conviction to help the American people uphold justice, and to return this Nation to its pre-eminent world status. I implore you to use your good offices to ensure these “Settlements” are disseminated without further delay.

Sincerely,

HODGES AND ASSOCIATES

[Signed] A. CLIFTON HODGES

ACH/gm

Cc: Lindell H. Bonney, Sr.
Clients
Bcc: Michael Cottrell

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

THE FOLLOWING DATA HAS BEEN PUBLISHED AT THE FOOT OF MOST OF THESE REPORTS FOR THE PAST THREE YEARS++: COMPILED BY U.S. SECURITIES EXPERT MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S..

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
NOTICES:

BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time AMENDING AND INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE. In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

ACHTUNG! KOMMT BALD DEI WEIMARREPUBIK AMERIKAS!

chrisstory

RECKLESS DODD SENATE BILL WILL MAKE THE CLASSIC GERMAN ‘WHEELBARROW HYPERINFLATION’ LOOK PLEASANTLY BENIGN AND ENJOYABLE BY COMPARISON

Tuesday 27 April 2010 15:00

PERVERSE DEATH-WISH DETERMINATION TO DO THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT IS REQUIRED

RESTORING AMERICA FINANCIAL STABILITY ACT [3217]: A RECIPE FOR TOTAL DISASTER

TITLE SHOULD BE: DESTROYING AMERICA FINANCIAL DICTATORSHIP AND INSTABILITY ACT

The add-ons and updates that accumulated at the top of this report have now been migrated to the foot of the report. This report as originally published on 27th April, with one Update, STARTS HERE:

• WORLD ENGULFED IN TOTAL ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL WARFARE

• RECENT SERPENTINE SETTLEMENTS-RELATED DEVELOPMENTS

• WAVE OF ARRESTS AGAIN REPORTED IN THE UNITED STATES

• THAT BANK OF ENGLAND MEETING ON 9TH APRIL REVIEWED

• THE ARRESTS AND JAILING OF EDDIE GEORGE AND GREENSPAN

• EARLIER ABORTED PAYOUT AGAIN LINKED TO SERPENTINE SABOTAGE

• UNDECLARED ALL-OUT FINANCIAL WARFARE AGAINST THE REST OF THE WORLD

• U.S. BANKS: WE WON’T PAY WITHOUT A LEGALLY
CODIFIED GUARANTEE THAT WE CAN’T EVER GO TO THE WALL

• ‘CONTRADICTIONS OF ARRESTS’ WITH WHAT THE WHITE HOUSE
IS ACTUALLY DOING AND INTENDING

• LEGISLATING FOR THE U.S. WEIMAR REPUBLIC

• PRECARIOUS SUBSTITUTE FOR ACTUAL WORLD WAR

• OBAMA’S DECEITFUL SPEECH AT THE COOPER UNION, NEW YORK

• GROSS WHITE HOUSE MISREPRESENTATION OF WHAT THE DODD BILL WILL DELIVER

• ‘COUP D’ETAT BY INSTALLMENTS’ BY STALIN’S GRANDSON

• OBAMA’S OUTRIGHT LIES TO THE ASSEMBLED BANKERS

• THE SINISTER OFFICE OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH INSIDE THE U.S. TREASURY:
LOCUS OF THE INTENDED WORLD FINANCIAL DICTATORSHIP

• WHO’LL BE IN CHARGE OF THE OFFICE OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH?
WHY, STALIN’S GRANDSON, OF COURSE

• MAIN PROVISIONS OF THIS INIQUITOUS DRAFT LEGISLATION

• POWERS OF THE OFFICE OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH

• DUPLICITOUS LEGISLATION INSTITUTIONALISES RACKETEERING
• SEE IMPORTANT UPDATE INSERTED 28TH APRIL UNDER THIS SEGMENT

• THE REAL PURPOSE: TO PREVENT THE DOLLAR REFUNDING FROM LONDON

• GENERAL POWERS TO BE TRANSFERRED TO THE U.S. TREASURY

• THE GENERAL POWERS TRANSFER MODEL:
HITLER’S PUTSCH IN 1933 AND THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

• HOW ARE THE MIGHTY IN THE PROCESS OF FALLING

• ‘GREEK CONTAGION’ CONFIRMS THE LONG-TERM
EMBEDDED STUPIDITY OF THE PAN-GERMAN DUMKOPFS

• THE WANTA MONEY-STEALING ROUTE RESURRECTED

• SUMMARY OF THE EDITOR’S WANTA INITIATIVE

• WANTA-GOODWIN FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT AGAINST THE EDITOR UNDER DURESS

• FEATURES OF THE FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT SCAM
AGAINST THE EDITOR PERPETRATED BY WANTA AND GOODWIN

• WANTA NOW IDENTIFED AS THE ‘GREAT DARK LORDS’ TERRORIST

• THE FAILING ‘COUP D’ETAT BY INSTALLMENTS’

• THE NSA/CIA/USAF HANDLER OF WANTA’S PROMOTER

• UPDATE: As of 8:00 hrs UK time on Wednesday 28th April 2010, the number of links to our report entitled ‘All UK legislation passed since 2000 is null and void’ had DOUBLED overnight to 22,000. For earlier background, see foot of the article itself [Archive: 10th April 2010].

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

• AS PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED, OUR LANDLINES REMAIN CLOSED BECAUSE OF UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT. WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL OR THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:
WORLD ENGULFED IN TOTAL ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL WARFARE
A state of TOTAL, MULTI-LAYERED, ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL WARFARE has now developed, characterised by what Lenin and Gorbachëv refer to as ‘contradictions’ – so that what is about to be summarised in outline may well appear to represent irreconcilable developments and conflicts. Being multi-layered, it has become harder than ever to see clearly through the fog of deception, diversion, disinformation and play-acting.

Therefore it is appropriate at the outset to remind you of the cast-iron rule that these Dark Forces operate EXCLUSIVELY on the basis of ‘contradictions’, duplicity, duplication and the dialectic. If you ever lose sight of this CENTRAL REALITY, you will revert to the state of mental confusion that prevailed before you started kindly reading these reports!

In accordance with the above behaviour, the Dark Actors Playing Games are able to say one thing on Monday while fully cognisant of the fact that what they are saying masks the precise opposite of what is intended. By their works, not their words, ye shall know them.

RECENT SERPENTINE SETTLEMENTS-RELATED DEVELOPMENTS
First, though, we have to report certain developments associated with the Settlements theme, which continues notwithstanding what will be revealed below.

To deal with these matters, first, therefore:

• We reported recently that President Obama has inserted himself into the Settlements Release Process by demanding 60% of the proceeds for the quote ‘United States’ unquote (which of course covers the kleptocracy with no checks and balances) rather than 40% (apparently ‘agreed’ earlier).

In this context, we stated that the only number in our vocabulary giving perspective to this was that we had always been informed that the tax payable given on-the-books transactions for the Dollar Refunding purposes (generating taxation accruals from the private sector into the US Treasury, for placement ONTO the Treasury’s books for continuous offsetting against the Federal Government’s colossal and doubled ‘background debt’), would be 35%.

We therefore presumed that this new talk of 60% rather than 40% represented bargaining in the background over the tax level payable. However the more sinister interpretation must be that the President of the United States is demanding 60% of the total Settlements for unspecified purposes (i.e. further illicit self-enrichment and Fraudulent Finance and trading operations).

• It has now been CONFIRMED to us (as of 11:10 hrs UK time on 25th April) that the following US criminalist parties have DEMANDED to be paid $1.3 trillion from the Settlement Funds:

George H. W. Bush Sr.
George Soros
Carlyle Group [of which President Sarkozy’s half-brother Olivier is an executive].

Although we accurately trailered the CIA’s intention to steal $1.3 trillion (reporting it in fact as a fait accompli) many weeks ago [see Archive], further information about this intended OFFICIAL THEFT was first made available to us on 30th March 2010 and has now been CONFIRMED, as indicated above. In other words, the top criminals and their lackeys are being paid off.

WAVE OF ARRESTS AGAIN REPORTED IN THE UNITED STATES
Meanwhile, has been renewed outbreak of arrests of bankers arising from their refusal to carry out payment instructions. Specifically the following arrests were reported to us after finalisation of the preceding analysis in this series:

• Over the ten days to Sunday 25th April approximately THIRTY people were arrested in the United States (no further details). It is understood that there was ‘heavy activity’ over the weekend.

• On Monday 19th April, a number of bank officials at Bank of America, Charlotte, the main base of the CIA’s primary institution were said to have been arrested.

• On Tuesday 20th April a number of arrests of officials at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas were reported to have been arrested.

• On Wednesday 21st April, four officials at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond were reported to have been arrested. This, of course, is highly significant, in view of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond’s Motion to Dismiss on 19th October 2007, in the United States Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria, a hearing attended by your correspondent.

• During the IMF Spring Meetings weekend, the entire area around Crystal City was deprived of cell phone and Internet connections for about an hour, during a period when Obama was in North Carolina. The Editor normally stays in the Crystal City area when visiting Washington, DC.

• HOWEVER, we understand that very determined efforts, evident from the roster of arrests, are being made to procure completion of certain Settlements payouts this week. No such ‘indications’ can ever be relied upon, though, as the fog of deception serves the purposes of obfuscation.

THAT BANK OF ENGLAND MEETING ON 9TH APRIL REVIEWED
According to further information received, the Settlements payments were in full swing as of 21st April, there being less than one page of transfer codes remaining before completion.

In the preceding report, we indicated that, at the special meeting convened at the extraordinary hour of 10.00 pm on 9th April 2010, at which all outstanding matters, including the issue of the $6.2 trillion loan money and the restoration of The Queen’s stolen gold, were reported to us to have been ‘resolved’, the funds were duly sent over to the United States to facilitate the payouts.

However with the benefit of ‘further and better particulars’, we are now advised that what actually happened was as follows:

• The meeting ‘resolved’ the outstanding issues as stated above.

• The meeting agreed to or indicated that it would send over the funds.

• Common sense evidently prevailed at the last moment, when it was finally understood, at long last, that THE U.S. AUTHORITIES CANNOT EVER BE TRUSTED, so the funds were NOT SENT OVER. In this context, it is possible (although we don’t know) that the $6.2 trillion may now be lodged outside the United States (hence Citibank’s rapid downsizing).

It is possible that the servants of the British Monarchical Power belatedly saw to it that previous lackadaisical ‘mistakes’ by the Bank of England were not to be repeated. After all, EVERYONE CONCERNED has now, surely, had AMPLE TIME, to grasp and to understand that the criminalist cadres controlling the United States are all DESPERATE MEN and have no other modus operandi but to continue with their scamming and orchestrated thievery and duplicity, with not the slightest intention of ‘going straight’, whatever they may deceitfully profess.

CAUTION; As we stated in Note (9) of the preceding report, such information is extremely hard to come by, and it can only, therefore, be acquired by observation, deduction and, if we are lucky, as a consequence of leaks. However this is the state of affairs ‘to the best of our knowledge and belief’.

THE ARRESTS AND JAILING OF EDDIE GEORGE AND GREENSPAN
It will be recalled that in the summer of 2007, we published, as FACT, that the former Governor of the Bank of England, Lord ‘Eddie’ George, had been arrested and jailed (in July 2007). We did not receive a libel writ from Lord George’s solicitors. Lord George died in April 2009. The reason that we didn’t receive a libel writ was that the information was of course accurate.

What we didn’t know until the first quarter of this year was WHY Lord George had been arrested. And the answer to that is that he was instrumental, in collaboration with Greenspan, in the stealing and alienation the Queen’s gold, effectively swapping it for worthless securities/pieces of paper. We suspected that this was the case, but we only obtained confirmation recently.

In June 2007, we also reported that Dr Alan Greenspan was likewise arrested and jailed. (He is believed to have been arrested several times). We duly reported this information on this website and in International Currency Review. Again, we did not receive a libel writ from Dr Greenspan’s lawyers, because the information was accurate. And one reason for his arrest was that Greenspan had assisted George with the heist of The Queen’s gold, which we alone reported in May 2007.

Our knowledge of this unbelievable abomination arose purely because on 29th-30th March 2007, an unannounced banking ‘blackout’ occurred in the United Kingdom.

• When such abrupt banking ‘blackouts’ occur, someone is usually up to no good.

The Editor became aware of this because he walked into a T-Mobile store on Victoria Street, Central London, to top up his mobile, using a Visa Card, which had good credit, but suddenly wouldn’t approved a payment of a mere £20.00.

On making further enquiries he discovered that this problem had arisen everywhere. Gradually, information about the stealing and diversion of gold belonging to the British Monarchical Power accumulated, so we published this in outline in May 2007 – in response to which a US operative stated: ‘I find that hard to believe’. We therefore told the operative to cease all contact, since if what we say is ‘hard to believe’, by definition there’s no point in having any further conversations.

Dr Alan Greenspan, George H. W. Bush Sr.’s criminal financial ‘technician’, has, we now learn, long been indicted by a Grand Jury, and is therefore a candidate for being ‘taken down’, irrespective of his age (which we suppose might let him off the hook). However mass Holocaust murderers in their eighties have been arrested, put on trial and jailed: so there’s no reason why ANY MERCY should be meted out to this criminal, who has destroyed countless lives and thrown the United States into a terminal tailspin (see below), from which it may only narrowly escape.

EARLIER ABORTED PAYOUT AGAIN LINKED TO SERPENTINE SABOTAGE
Following the further sabotage of the Settlements process on Wednesday 21st April, a renewed outbreak of snake-like behaviour among certain operatives was detected. All of a sudden, the various ‘concrete’ confirmations and undertakings that had been forthcoming two weeks earlier, were reversed, and these people started reverting to earlier delusions and misrepresentations.

Furthermore, there were renewed indications that the felon Lee/Leo Wanta was to be used as a cover to divert key funds, as planned: so, for that reason, we reveal hitherto unpublished detail of Fraud in the Inducement with which Wanta and his CIA lawyer, Steven Goodwin, were involved with respect to the Editor’s stolen $35,000 loan, below – together with further information reconfirming that this man is a recalcitrant, dangerous financial terrorist, assisted by known criminal operatives. We place this information at the end of this report.

UNDECLARED ALL-OUT FINANCIAL WARFARE AGAINST THE REST OF THE WORLD
What has become clearer is that the Obama Administration of the Crooked Continuum is intent on conducting all-out economic and financial warfare against the Rest of the World, while purporting to be collaborating with certain elements of it (especially the Chinese, who appear to have ‘lost their bottle’ and to be scared to utilise the immense powers that they deploy as Lien holders) in order to ‘divide and rule’ – the White House’s main tactical objective having been to try to separate out and isolate the British Monarchical Power and also those components of MI-6 and certain other British intelligence structures who may not be engaged in double-crossing and betraying The Queen out of perverse preference for the fashionable idolatry of German ‘cooperation’, you understand).

U.S. BANKS: WE WON’T PAY WITHOUT A LEGALLY
CODIFIED GUARANTEE THAT WE CAN’T EVER GO TO THE WALL
Within this strategy is a perverse renewed and ongoing White House intent to circumnavigate the Basel List payment instructions and to sidestep Basel-II. The pretext for all this is that the US banks in question are now maintaining that they will not disgorge any of the stolen, diverted and illegally acquired monies, including the monies they have been making from Settlement funds via further trading, without their continued existence being GUARANTEED by the Federal Government, with the necessary provisions codified in law so that they cannot go bankrupt. It will be recalled that Bank of America refused to disgorge on the grounds that it would collapse if it did.

‘CONTRADICTIONS’ OF THE ARRESTS WITH WHAT
THE WHITE HOUSE IS ACTUALLY DOING AND INTENDING
Yet, notwithstanding all of the above, the arrests identified to us on the basis of reports, have been taking place precisely because these US criminal enterprises have been refusing to disgorge the funds. That is just one dimension of the current ‘contradictions’ referenced at the beginning of this report. (Four US institutions reportedly control $7.0 trillion of ‘real money’ – plus 50% of Credit Card business, and 75% of US ‘real money’ liquidity. The institutions concerned are Citibank, the Bank of America, Wachovia, Wells Fargo: Goldman Sachs ought perhaps to be included),

LEGISLATING FOR THE U.S. WEIMAR REPUBLIC
So, on the one hand, the immense pressure being exerted against financial institutions, with no leniency being extended towards complicit Federal Reserve Banks either, continues; while on the other hand – as explained below – legislative measures are being assembled to procure a state of affairs which would get the banks off the hook while at the same time enabling the organised criminal operatives inside the structures:

• To perpetuate the racketeering financial carousel on such a scale as to guarantee that the United States WILL experience a Wiemar-style hyperinflation and currency collapse.

• To perform the US Dollar Refunding operation in a corrupt and wholly counterproductive manner from within the US Treasury, in precise opposition to the necessity for the Refunding to take place SOUNDLY in the private (NOT the Government) sector, so that the resulting accruals are taxed and placed onto the US Treasury’s books – thereby counteracting and diminishing the irresponsibly incurred, wholly unnecessary official debt that has been accumulated since Obama came to power (doubling in two years the aggregate of debt reported by the Office of Management and Budget).

• INSTEAD OF WHICH, in order to RETAIN TOTAL CONTROL and to protect themselves from the consequences of their past serial illegal financial manipulations involving securitisation, which is illegal, and all the other unfettered breaches of the Rule of Law over which they have presided, they are content for ‘background’ debt to be accumulated on a Weimar scale with no thought for tomorrow. So long as they’re off the hook (as they foolishly imagine), that’s all that matters.

• Except that the course they intend will destroy ALL VALUE, will degrade the US dollar, will plunge the world economy into the Grandfather of all depressions, will precipitate uncontrolled physical strife and warfare, will result in the breakup of all multinational institutions, will despatch numerous already bankrupt institutions to the wall, will destroy personal and corporate savings, will decimate whole swathes of the industial and agricultural economy everywhere, and will condemn the world to the possibility that modern civilisation will actually collapse as power supplies will be disrupted and electronic communications and payments systems will cease to function. That’s just a brief summary of HOW EVIL THESE FINANCIAL TERRORISTS ARE, how STUPID AND ARROGANT THEY ARE, and why, for as long as they remain in control, THE WORLD WILL CONTINUE TO DESCEND INTO THIS MAELSTROM OF ALL-OUT ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL DECADENCE.

• And this is ALL a DIRECT consequence of the takeover of the Central Intelligence Agency by the pan-German cadre, de facto heirs of the Nazi Abwehr (military intelligence), aided and abetted by their Zionazi allies, and their visceral hatred of the ‘Main Enemy’.

You can dismiss this out of hand if you prefer, but you will find to your distress that what we have been saying on this score is has been correct all along.

PRECARIOUS SUBSTITUTE FOR ACTUAL WORLD WAR
THIS ALL-OUT ECONOMIC WARFARE is supposed to substitute for actual violence and military hostilities; but the way things are going, that substitution will collapse.

We turn now to the mechanism whereby the criminalist serpents holding supreme power in the United States intend, as they see it, to ‘slide out from under’ so as to retain total control for themselves and their cronies – ensuring a catastrophic Weimar-style outcome in the process.

OBAMA’S DECEITFUL SPEECH AT THE COOPER UNION, NEW YORK
Speaking at the Cooper Union, New York City on 22nd April, Mr Barack Obama continued with his sudden campaign to ‘control derivatives’ – buttressed by a separate sound-bite observation, for public consumption, that he would veto any financial reform Bill sent to him for signature that does not ‘control derivatives’. In that case, manifestly, the President must veto the convoluted (draft) Bill emerging thanks to Stalin’s grandson, Senator Christopher Dodd, from the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, labelled as a (draft) Bill: ‘To promote the financial stability of the United States by improving the accountability and transparency of the financial system, to end ‘too big to fail’, to protect the American taxpayer by ending bailouts, to protect consumers from abusive financial services practices, and for other purposes’.

• This Bill now has a number: 3217, and the title: Restoring America Financial Stability Act.

• The title of this iniquitous draft legislation should read:
Destroying America Financial Dictatorship and Instability Act 2010.

GROSS WHITE HOUSE MISREPRESENTATION OF WHAT THE DODD BILL WILL DELIVER
This draft Bill, as published, runs to 1,336 pages; but according to the respected former Federal Government economist, Lawrence Lindsey, speaking on CNBC between 8:01 hrs and 8:05 hours on 22nd April, the actual length of the Bill is 1407 pages – implying that there are 71 pages containing stuff of such sensitivity that US and foreign observers wont be allowed to read what they contain.
Mr Lindsey made three points, after perusing the text of this iniquitous (see below) Senate Bill:

• The Treasury and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) will gain the power to extend UNLIMITED LOAN GUARANTEES to financial institutions.

• The Federal Reserve will gain the codified power to take collateral from the banks and to lend against it (perpetually institutionalising the previously ‘short-term’ TALF arrangements).

• A ‘rainy day’ fund with loan guarantees will constitute a separate Government-administered fund, with a demanded base of $50 billion. This is identical to the ‘rainy day’ fund that the Grand Jury-indicted Greenspan exploited on an open-ended basis on behalf of the CIA/DVD Bush Crime nexus for Fraudulent Finance purposes.

‘COUP D’ETAT BY INSTALLMENTS’ BY STALIN’S GRANDSON
Mr Lindsey didn’t have time during that slot to say more, but he gave the necessary ‘heads-up’ to ensure that those not asleep on their brains would make haste to research the CONtent and the intent of this iniquitous Bill introduced by Stalin’s grandson. In two nutshells, the Dodd Bill:

• Codifies ‘Too Big To Fail’ ensuring that BANKS CAN NEVER GO BANCKRUPT, so that the corrosive Fraudulent Finance carousel racketeering activity can be continued sine die.

• Facilitates the ‘full transparency’ of the banks’ balance sheets by enabling their worthless off-balance sheet accruals to be ‘expunged from the record’ (shoved into an unaccountable black hole) with securitisation assets simply recreated so that the carousel can continue, also sine die. Essentially, the accrued off-balance sheet Fraudulent Finance disappear into a vacuum. But:

• The ‘other side of the Government’s balance sheet accrues debt on a scale with no historical precedent, guaranteeing that Weimar will be recalled as a pleasurable experience.

• As explained above, this is all being arranged amid a barrage of crass double-speak in order to sidestep the Basel List, the Basel-II requirements, the private sector Refunding Programme using the sovereign loan money provided by the British Monarchical Power, and to entice the Chinese, who appear to have lost their nerve, to continue the carousel. (Until the United States and China collapse in tandem, of course).

One can perhaps now more easily understand why President Sarkozy didn’t care if the TV cameras caught him screaming vituperative hatred at Russian President Medvedev, and calling President Obama ‘insane’. Because the covert Soviets haven’t been quite as stupid in this connection as the avaricious and corrupted French and Germans.

In the circumstances, we can now perhaps characterise President Sarkozy as having been rather polite on both occasions. For France is stuffed, like Germany, to the gills with the consequences of US Fraudulent Finance scamming transactions (think the 3,000+ Bush Crime Family-linked accounts an Paribas, and the colossal volume of worthless derivatives assets held by Deutsche Bank AG, Dresdner Bank and Commerzbank).

OBAMA’S OUTRIGHT LIES TO THE ASSEMBLED BANKERS
Mr Lawrence Lindsey’s CNBC observations preceded the address given by President Obama at the Cooper Union, in which Mr Barack Obama – the man who has allowed the entire official debt of the American Treasury incurred over the best part of a century to double in the space of just two years because he perversely refused to permit the transparent, taxable private sector Dollar Refunding Programme using the sovereign loan fund of $6.2 trillion to be implemented because control would have been partly wrested from the hands of the criminal financial enterprises and their cronies holding high office and elsewhere within the structures – made the following weasel statement, which is the precise REVERSE OF THE TRUTH:

‘It is essential that we learn the lessons from
this crisis so that we don’t doom ourselves to repeat it’.

• FACT: The draft Dodd Bill won’t just have the effect of REPEATING the crisis,
it will GUARANTEE A CRISIS 100 TIMES WORSE – AND BY DESIGN.

Now the draft Senate Bill from Dodd establishes (see below) an Office of Financial Research situated INSIDE THE TREASURY. This Office Committee will set up a DICTATORSHIP, as we will be explaining – something, obviously, that Stalin’s grandson could not possibly have any objection to.

But first, Mr Obama’ speech at the Cooper Union (part of a broader campaign by the White House to ensure support for this bad Bill – which is designed to enable the kleptocracy to enjoy unlimited, perpetuated and unquestioned freedom and power to engage in open-ended Fraudulent Finance Racketeering operations, while, in the tradition of DUPLICITOUS DOUBLE-MINDEDNESS, claiming to ensure financial sector and economic stability and no danger of repetition of the 2007-2009 crisis) – embraced several numbered points which we can refute right away:

• First, ‘we need a system [provided via the Dodd Bill] to shut these firms down’. FACT: As will be shown below, the Senate draft will hand the Office of Financial Research UNLIMITED POWERS to close down any bank or other financial (and commercial) entity AT HOME AND ABROAD handling US dollars that they consider to be a ‘threat’ ostensibly to the security of the United States, but in reality to the intended closed Fraudulent Finance carousel institutionalising criminal operations by the organized control kleptocracy. THEY WANT TO ELIMINATE THE COMPETITION.

THE SINISTER OFFICE OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH INSIDE THE U.S. TREASURY:
LOCUS OF THE INTENDED WORLD FINANCIAL DICTATORSHIP
Specifically, the authority to be given to the sinister-sounding intelligence agency to be called the Office of Financial Research, the powers of which will be comprehensive, absolute and arbitrary, will include powers to close down OFFSHORE ENTITIES. Thus ANY financial or business entity that is dealing in or handling US dollars anywhere in the world will be vulnerable to being shut down by the internal US Treasury Committee that will be making all the decisions, behind closed doors, as to which entities should be allowed to exist, and which entities should be closed down – on no basis other that a subjective determination that the entity may be a potential threat to the security of the United States (that is to say, to the closed Fraudulent Finance racketeering, trading and platform operations protected and codified in perpetuity by this iniquitous control legislation).

• A SPECIFIC EXAMPLE would be a Dollar Refunding entity operated from London: see below.

• On the face of it, this drastic, insane (as Sarkozy indicated), apparent own-goal arrangement could ensure that foreigners cease conducting transactions in US dollars altogether – thereby destroying the United States’ hegemony over energy products (denominated in US dollars), and forcing China, Russia, Britain, Japan and European countries to operate using other currencies.

But in practice, given the presence around the world of US corporations trading in US dollars, this provision codifies the power of the US dollar, while at the same time prospectively destroying the Euro, the pound and any other currencies, including the Chinese reminbi, and related structures, standing in its way. In the process, the US dollar system will become a catastrophically decadent, inflation-generating global system under the ‘corporate’ control of the rats – the continuing and successor rats within the Bush-Clinton-Cheney-DVD Box Gang and associated Fascist criminalist components of the Nazi-minded enemies of humanity.

• Secondly ‘the Bill would also enact what’s known as the Volcker Rule’… [which] ‘places some limits on the size of banks and the kinds of risks that banking institutions can take. FACT: The Volcker Rule becomes completely inconsequential in the light of Dodd.

• Thirdly ‘reform would bring a new transparency to many financial markets’. Obama said that ‘many practices were so opaque, so confusing, so complex, that people inside the [trading] firms didn’t understand them, much less those who were charged with overseeing them’ [curious, then, how the SEC joined in the Fraudulent Finance bonanza itself under Mr George W. Bush’s criminal Administration: see CMKX Complaint, 9th January 2010, et seq.: Archive].

‘They weren’t fully aware of the massive bets that were being placed. That’s what led [the CIA operative/asset – Ed.] Warren Buffett to describe derivatives that were bought and sold with little oversight as ‘financial weapons of mass destruction’ – because, as Mr Barack Obama DID NOT SAY, securitisation is illegal in the United States [see Archive].

So, greater transparency? Not at all. On the contrary, the Dodd Bill will MAXIMISE THE POTENTIAL FOR ONGOING CONFUSION, because there will in fact be no clear set of rules (AS THE 1933 AND 1934 SECURITIES ACTS WILL BE OVERRIDDEN UNDER DODD: see below). The only ‘rules’ will be those arbitrarily specified by the new Treasury-based below-the-radar intelligence organisation to be named Office of Financial Research. So, if a financial entity wants to do something, whether new’ or not, it will have to obtain this internal US Treasury Committee’s prior agreement.

And since, as we have amply shown, the US Treasury is a notoriously duplicitous and corrupt institution, engaged ‘as we speak’ in disreputable Fraudulent finance operations, can BRIBERY of officials within the Office of Financial Research be far away? Of course not.

• In the fourth place ‘this plan (Dodd) would enact the strongest consumer financial protections ever’. FACT: Once the ominous-sounding Office of Financial Research has been established and is operative inside the us Treasury, the Consumer Protection Agency (CPA) will have nothing to do. Because it will be up against an arbitrary power centre subject to no checks and balances which will make up the rules as it goes along, thereby ensuring that whatever the CPA imagines that it is supposed to be doing, could be upset and overruled at any moment. And of course the draft Dodd Senate legislation provides that none of the more drastic provisions can be repealed.

• In the fifth place ‘These Wall Street reforms will give shareholders new power in the financial system. They will get what we call a say on pay, a voice with respect to the salaries and bonuses awarded to top executives. And the SEC will have the authority to give shareholders more say in corporate elections, so that investors and pension holders have a stronger rôle in determining who manages the company in which they’ve placed their savings. FACTS: As demonstrated below, not only does the Senate draft Bill override the Securities and Exchange Act, but also NO MENTION whatsoever of what Obama talked about here is found in the published pages of the Bill.

WHO’LL BE IN CHARGE OF THE OFFICE OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH?
WHY, STALIN’S GRANDSON, OF COURSE
Now Senator Christopher Dodd is stepping down from the Legislature and is not standing for re-election. Who do you suppose will emerge as the first Secretary of the Treasury for the Office of Financial Research? Why, Senator Dodd, STALIN’S GRANDSON, himself, don’t you know. As we have repeatedly stated, pan-German and covert Soviet intelligence collaborate and share their common interests at the highest level: and Stalin’s grandson operates at the highest level.

MAIN PROVISIONS OF THIS INIQUITOUS DRAFT LEGISLATION
Pending a planned detailed analysis by this service of this iniquitous and duplicitous legislation, which (in accordance with the double-mindedness dialectical methodology routinely employed by these people, as we have seen) purports ‘to promote the financial stability of the United States by improving accountability and transparency in the financial system’ but does the exact opposite, the Bill promoted by Stalin’s grandson would procure as follows.

The Dodd (Senate) Bill, which analysts are already saying they ‘don’t understand’ and which is already the subject of confusion-mongering and obfuscation by ‘spinmeisters’:

• Will supercede the Securities Acts 1933 and 1934.

• Will, as reported above, establish an unaccountable intelligence and oppression mechanism within the US Treasury with unfettered dictatorial and arbitrary powers that can be applied without checks and balances at home and abroad, ominously called the Office of Financial Research.

• Will place the US Treasury in a position where it can do anything it likes with no checks and balances, with total impunity, so that corrupt finance will be ‘legitimised’ by the co-conspiring US Congress, institutionalising racketeering by the organised criminal cadres operating from within the US structures that have been systematically exposed since 2005-06.

POWERS OF THE OFFICE OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH
The Office of Financial Research will be empowered to:

• Declare any non-bank financial institution or entity ANYWHERE to be a threat to US security.

• Having made such an arbitrary determination without checks and balances, take steps to destroy the entity in question, DECLARING its existence and operations to be null and void.

• Decide, without accountability or regard to the Rule of Law, let alone to so-called ‘alliances’ and the despised ‘Special Relationship’, who and what is ‘an enemy of the United States’.

• Accordingly, arbitrarily target any non-bank financial entity, or ANY entity HANDLING AND TRADING IN U.S. DOLLARS, i.e. ANY FOREIGN CORPORATION, FOR ‘TAKEDOWN’ WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE OR EXPLANATION. Any entity using US dollars would be vulnerable to such unilateral arbitrary action.

• Put another way and by extension, ‘take down’ any non-United States-based institution, broker-dealer or other entity to which the Office of Financial Research takes objection – which is to say, ANY entity, at home or abroad, that is arbitrarily considered by the Office of Financial Research, with the full authority of the US Secretary of the Treasury, to represent A THREAT TO THEIR ONGOING PERMISSIVE FRAUDULENT FINANCE RACKETEERING OPERATIONS.

THE REAL PURPOSE: TO PREVENT THE DOLLAR REFUNDING FROM LONDON
FACT: As you are aware, the planned fully transparent, taxable, visible on-balance sheet, US Dollar refunding operation is the undisputed solution to the United States’ self-imposed crisis (which it has inflicted for self-interested and revolutionary reasons on the Rest of the World). This Group of Seven-approved mechanism, using sovereign loan funds for the purpose, delivers windfall taxes into the hands and onto the books of the US Treasury in full view, forcing the US Treasury to credit them (so that they cannot be diverted, which is what the corrupt US Treasury objects to) against the permissive, pointless, avoidable, unnecessary and corrosive ‘background’ official Federal debt incurred by this reckless Administration and its predecessors.

• HOWEVER, the hidden intent buried within the draft Dodd Senate Bill is in reality to declare this US Dollar Refunding operation A THREAT TO THE SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES AND TO HAVE IT CLOSED DOWN. In other words, these criminals intend to procure that the single, agreed-upon and sound, reliable solution to the entire crisis is A THREAT TO THE SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES, i.e., THE SOUND SOLUTION THREATENS THEIR RACKETEERING OPS.

In summary, therefore, the provisions buried inside the colossal Dodd draft Bill from the Senate which would empower the Office of Financial Research arbitrarily to DECLARE any non-bank entity at home or abroad to be a ‘threat to the security of the United States’ and therefore a candidate for being ‘taken down’ with its operations to be deemed by unaccountable apparatchiks to be null and void, are SPECIFICALLY AND INTENTIONALLY targeted at the planned on-balance sheet US Dollar Refunding Programme deploying the sovereign loan funds provided pro bono humanitas that’s to be managed by the US Securities expert Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., from London – all necessary arrangements having been made effective from the end of May 2009 for that purpose, given the intransigence of the official US control kleptocracy in this regard.

Moreover the US Treasury Secretary will be empowered to:

• Invest in any asset, activity, operation or programme without visibility, accountability or checks and balances that they like (so much for ‘accountability’).

• Issue arbitrary and CLANDESTINE instructions, as we have seen, to the Treasury’s Office of Financial Research to target and ‘take down’ any entity, whether within the US jurisdiction or offshore, that he considers to be a ‘threat’, i.e. to be getting in the way of them, US Treasury’s unfettered, permissive, hidden trading program and clandestine (CIA) racketeering operations.

DUPLICITOUS LEGISLATION INSTITUTIONALISES RACKETEERING
And it has recently come to light that the US Treasury is so desperate to continue its reckless racketeering activities below the radar, that it is currently, as we speak, engaged in clandestine program trading operations with selected counterparty ‘takers’ involving the arbitrary issuance of Treasury Securities for use as collateral at a de facto interest yield of 50%.

In other words, the Geithner Treasury is ALREADY generating massive volumes of ‘trashets’ below the radar, over and above what is implied by its permissive formal financing operations to ‘manage’ the $4.5 trillion of additional and completely unnecessary debt that the Obama régime is proudly incurring in the space of two years (doubling in just two years the officially REPORTED debt burden accumulated by the Treasury in almost a full century).

It is ALREADY the case that the reckless, ill-advised, permissive measures taken by the Obama Administration to date have condemned American taxpayers to generations of higher taxes than are ‘necessary’, given that NONE OF THIS DEBT need have been incurred AT ALL had the US Dollar Refunding Programme using the sovereign $6.2 loan funds provided pro bono humanitas on 19th-20th June 2007 been used for the purpose for which it was intended – instead of being hijacked by the organised kleptocracy embedded in the US structures, beginning at the White House and the controlling criminalised US Intelligence Power.

But now, with the Republican Party – increasingly seen abroad as a hotbed of dirty dealing and criminality – desperate to continue Fraudulent Finance racketeering as though there had never been any discontinuity – the Dodd Bill, or what emerges from the Senate, is more than likely to be enacted, ‘enabling’ Obama to sign it into law.

• UPDATE, 28th April 2010: A trusted New York US financial expert observer known personally to the Editor of this service provides the following elaboration to the first paragraph under the heading given immediately above. We reproduce his very illuminating observations verbatim:

‘To some degree, this type of percentage return corresponds with what I was told last week with regard to a certain offered Dollar Investment Program that ‘promises’ upwards of an 800% return over a two- to three-year period, the minimum investment being $100 million. I don’t know all the specifics, as yet, though a very trusted and knowledgeable non-USA source says he checked same out, in depth, and it appears to be framed in a very legitimate program’.

• Editor’s comment: OF COURSE! ALL PONZI SCHEMES ARE FRAMED TO APPEAR LEGITIMATE!

Our correpsondent continues that ‘my comment to him was’:

‘In my humble opinion, this Tooth Fairy-promised return can only be possible if one is the owner of a commercial bank utilizing the fractional reserve system, wherein near-zero interest paid for USA Treasury funds is multiplied by a factor of 9x times, then the resultant amount is self-traded at 100x leverage within the foreign exchange spot and forward markets. Add in the advantage of criminal pre-notification of US Treasury and currency decisions as they will affect the dollar exchange rates, telling one where to place their long and short 100-to1 leveraged trading bets, and there you have your ‘guaranteed’ near-infinity return on investment, whereby a ‘nearly free’ borrowed US$1.0 times 9, times 100, yields a US$900 now-leveraged bet that, in turn, earns many multiples of itself. Absent the foregoing, it’s an outright fraud, a planned Ponzi scheme’.

• Editor’s further comment: Under the so-called ‘Restoring America Financial Stability Act’, which means the opposite of what it professes, THE U.S. TREASURY CAN DO ANYTHING, and will MOST CERTAINLY engage in the origination of such contracts, which will degrade the dollar to zero and will GUARANTEE an outcome FAR WORSE THAN WEIMAR, ENGULFING THE WHOLE WORLD.

‘NULL AND VOID’ AND ‘MISPRISION OF FELONY’
The manipulators within the components of the Intelligence Power theoretically retain the option to procure, by whatever means they may deem feasible, to have Obama removed from office as an impostor – although in practice, since he was sworn into office by the Chief Justice (who made a deliberate mistake in the process, but Obama was subsequently re-sworn inside the White House behind closed doors soon afterwards, OSTENSIBLY by the Chief Justice), the Supreme Court would be destroying what remains of its own credibility by concurring in any such process short of actual impeachment. However it remains the case that all laws and Executive Orders signed by Mr Obama could subsequently be found to be null and void – a possibility recently taken up by Mr G. Gordon Liddy, a Box Gang operative, in his broadcast programme on 20th April 2010, taking a leaf out of this Editor’s report revealing that ‘All UK legislation since 2000 is null and void’. Specifically, Liddy (the felon of Watergate and Cheneygate), who is both an attorney and also a ‘former’ FBI agent, asserted, in response to Artie from Chicago who asked what the fate of the Obama health care legislation might be, responded: ‘Any bill signed into law… by non-President Obama would be null and void’. He then repeated the phrase ‘null and void’ shortly afterwards.

And in a separate radio show on the same date, Liddy spent an hour on the case of Colonel Lakin, who is to be court-marshalled because he is refusing deployment orders on the ground that he doesn’t know who his Commander-in-Chief is. In this broadcast, Liddy showed to ‘the interested’ that he had read our report entitled ‘All UK legislation passed since 2000 is null and void’ (which, at 07:51 hrs on 26th April 2010 had accumulated 10,500 links, and was up to no less than 10,900 links by Tuesday morning 27th April, by the way). Specifically, Liddy referred twice to Obama’s legislation and Executive Orders being ‘null and void’, indicating a reference by transference, to our report.

We stress, however, that our study of the way the Soviet Leninists operate (in the context of our work for Soviet Analyst) reveals that what the controllers have procured by placing Obama in the top slot is just AN OPTION to proceed as suggested above, depending (as Lenin would have put it) on the ‘correlation of forces’. For don’t forget, these people all use Lenin’s modus operandi.

Close and reliable observers in the United States have also informed us that reference to ‘Misprision of Felony’ is increasingly noticed in the public domain. Isn’t that interesting?

GENERAL POWERS TO BE TRANSFERRED TO THE U.S. TREASURY
At the Cooper Union, the audience of financiers applauded when Mr Obama ventilated populist sentiments, and failed to grasp that the intended legislation contradicts what came out of his mouth. This is because these people live in a one-dimensional universe and do not, as a rule, understand that policy is dictated by a narrow clique of controlled, organised criminal Fascist revolutionary kleptocrats in their own interests who make common cause with Lenin (globalism being, of course, profoundly Leninist). No doubt among their number will have been bankers who will have ordered the colossal Dodd draft text to be perused with the proverbial fine toothcomb.

It will be interesting to see whether any of their number sticks his head out to warn of the terrible consequences that will ensue, not just for the United States but for the whole world, if this truly iniquitous piece of dirty US legislation reaches the tarnished Statute Book.

More generally, what Stalin’s grandson does in this draft senate Bill is essentially to TRASNFER GENERAL POWERS TO THE U.S. TREASURY – the self-same technique that the covert pan-German Continuum has used to entice the weak European nations into the European Union Collective. What Britain and these countries have blindly done is to confuse ‘cooperation’ with collectivism and entrapment.

On accession, the intended satrap nation state transfers GENERAL POWERS to the unelected control apparat in Brussels, which is devoid of any meaningful checks and balances despite the convoluted arrangements laid down in the 1992 Maastricht Treaty, and is dominated by the Franco-German alliance institutionalised by the treaty of the Elysée of January 1963, of indefinite duration.

THE GENERAL POWERS TRANSFER MODEL:
HITLER’S PUTSCH IN 1933 AND THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE
As we have revealed, this apparat is institutionally corrupt, since the European Commission’s accounts have specifically NOT been approved by the EU’s own Court of Auditors located in Luxembourg, for the past 14 years. This means of course that the European Commission [EC] is a criminal enterprise, which is continuing to ‘trade’ using taxpayers’ money when it cannot account for the funds it has consumed for the past 14 years.

The UK Serious Fraud Office has placed on the record through its official John Craig, confirmation of the basic fact that it is a criminal offence for taxpayers’ funds to be remitted into the hands of a criminal enterprise. By extension, therefore, it is also a criminal offence for the British and other governments to continue paying Value Added Tax (VAT) receipts over to the European Commission KNOWING THAT THE E.C.’S ACCOUNTS HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED FOR THE PAST 14 YEARS.

• Taxpayers are accordingly being defrauded by the British (and other craven) EU satrap regimes.

The earlier version of a catastrophic transference of GENERAL POWERS into the hands of an unaccountable dictatorship occurred on 23rd March 1933, when Adolf Hitler (Schickelgruber), having resorted to intimidation and mendacity and banning the Communist deputies from the Reichstag following the contrived ‘red scare’ triggered by the Reichstag Fire, managed to secure the necessary two-thirds majority in the new Reichstag for an ENABLING ACT that transferred legislative authority from the Reichstag itself to his Cabinet, ostensibly for four years (1).

‘A wave of Nazi purges followed, as one institution after another was subjugated. Arbitrary rule replaced government by law in what has aptly been termed a “coup d’état by installments” (2). By summer, all parties except the Nazis had been dissolved…’.

HOW ARE THE MIGHTY IN THE PROCESS OF FALLING
Our Malaysian correspondent, Matthias Chang, has provided the following description of what happened when Tony Blair appeared at a pyramid-shaped (i.e. globalist-esoteric, as in Las Vegas, Astana (Kazakhstan) and other deluded geomasonic ‘points of light’ locations around the world), on 24th April 2010 to provide a confused audience with the benefit of his sterile prognostications. The following report, which has been widely disseminated, is reproduced verbatim:

War criminal Tony Blair, the keynote speaker at the National Achievers Conference organised by Success Resources, a sycophant Singapore outfit at the Sunway Pyramid Convention Centre in Kuala Lumpur, hid in fear at the threat that members of the Malaysian anti-war NGOs would throw slippers at him and that members of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission would serve an indictment for war crimes.

Extensive security measures were put in place before his arrival for the three-day event. For the first time, delegates to the conference had no itinerary of the speakers invited to speak at the convention. Organisers and delegates were not even told when speakers were scheduled to speak. There was a total black out!

Delegates have to wear a special wrist band for the entire duration of the convention for identification purposes and anyone without the security wrist band was not allowed to enter the vicinity of the convention hall.

Chairman of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission, Mr Zainur Zakaria, the Chief Prosecutor of the War Crimes Commission, Mr. Matthias Chang, with two members of the Perdana Global Peace Organisation, Mr. Ram Karthigasu and Mr. Christopher Chang, a representative of the Malaysian Kwong Siew Association, and two representatives of the Iraq Community in Malaysia evaded the security by registering themselves as delegates.

At 8.30 am, members of NGOs gathered at the entrance of the convention center to protest against the visit of war criminal Blair. Undercover teams were dispatched to the three separate entrances to confront and attempt to serve the war crimes indictment on Blair. But he could not be seen entering the convention centre.

He had entered surreptitiously and was hiding in a VIP room just above the convention hall where the function was held. His original schedule was 10.00am this morning. But organisers issued statements that no schedule is available.

British and Malaysian security officers were seen patrolling the corridors and had identified the seven delegates who were waiting for Blair. They kept a close watch on the delegates. Mind games began when rumours were spread that Blair would not be speaking today. Hints were given that Blair would be speaking on Sunday in the hope that the seven delegates would abandon their vigil.

At 11.25am, the seven delegates discovered that Blair was hiding in the VIP room just above the convention hall. They took their positions, with three members tasked with taking photographs.

At 11.30am Blair and his team of goons descended from the VIP room and walked towards the VIP entrance of the convention hall.

Mr. Matthias Chang and Mr. Zainur Zakaria rushed forward to serve the indictment, while the Iraqi representatives loudly denounced former Prime Minister Blair as a “mass murderer, war criminal, shame on you”, repeatedly. Blair was obviously unsettled and put on an embarrassed smile.

Mr. Matthias Chang and Mr. Zainur Zakaria were prevented from handing the indictment to Blair by over 30 British and Malaysian security personnel. Both of them denounced ex-Prime Minister Blair within earshot, “War criminal, shame on you! Mass Murderer!”

Mr. Zainur Zakaria also shouted at the Malaysian security personnel: “Why are you protecting a war criminal?” The security officers could only respond with a silly expression.

The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission stated later that this is only the beginning of a global campaign to ostracise war criminals like Blair and Bush and urge people the world over to adopt similar campaigns against Bush and Blair. ENDS.

• FACTS: Blair and his wife Cherie have ‘certain interests’ in Kuala Lumpur. Back home, Blair has acquired a Jacobean mansion at Weston Underwood, within the Bernwode area adjacent to where the Editor is writing this report in Buckinghamshire. According to recent press reports, he has a staff of more than 130 lackeys, and needs a very large staff to maintain the formal gardens and the mansion (which used to belong to Sir John Gielgud, the actor), in the pristine state to which it is historically accustomed.

Investigative reports have established, by perusing Companies House entries, that the ‘Blair Machine’ operates via a complex, Maxwellian network of interrelated companies and private partnerships. Specifically, there are two tiers of these Blair entities – uemploying geo-esoteric names: Windrush and Firerush (Wind and Fire).

The provocative selection of these names proves that Blair’s religiosity (like Wanta’s: see below) is fraudulent and that in reality he is engaged, when he is not enriching himself further, in promoting the sterile ‘New Age of Aquarius’ World Pantheistic (= pagan) Religion, which seeks to ‘merge’ all organised religions into one – a work of Satan – and to ‘legitimise’ vile abominations such as the primary activity in which these people engage after moneymaking: paedophilia.

Indeed in the vast pyramid structure designed by the agnostic British architect Sir Norman Foster at Astana (anagram of the Russian for Satan, satana), Kazakhstan, is a huge circular meeting room built round a sun image dedicated to meetings of the controllers of organised religions around the world, who meet at this venue, named after Satan, for this very purpose.

A domestic problem all along may well have been how to effect the transfer of any funds received through ‘facilitating’ the then latest version of the EU control mechanism at the time of the rolling European Union Collective’s Treaty in 2005 [see the first report in this series: Archive] plus any corrupt payments that may have been received, as reported, in exchange for ‘facilitation’ of the illegal attack on Iraq, including $136 million reportedly transferred into an account in Abu Dhabi.

Funds reportedly held within the Ansbacher banking network in the British Virgin Islands, Malaysia and elsewhere will also have needed repatriation.

Note that the Windrush entities are DUPLICATED by the Firerush entities. To both groups of Blair corporations, which must file accounts with Companies House, are attached private partnerships, which do not file accounts available for public scrutiny. Any private citizen trying to bamboozle HM Revenue and Customs nowadays with such a complex tax structure would immediately trigger a mandatory investigation. But, as we have repeatedly pointed out, if you wind up belonging to the intergovernmental élite, the Rule of Law doesn’t apply to you.

GERMANS BASICALLY TELL GREECE TO GET OUT OF THE EURO
While the International Monetary Fund grappled during the Spring Meetings in Washington, DC, with the Greek financial meltdown brought about as a direct consequence of Fraudulent Finance transactions via Citibank, Athens (as previously revealed by this service), Hans-Peter Friedrich, a senior official of the CSU, the Bavarian segment of the so-called ‘Christian Democrats’ led by Frau Angela Merkel, the ‘former’ East German Communist Party activist and Secretary for Agitation and Propaganda in the Communist Youth Wing at Karl Marx University, stated pointedly for world public consumption that the possibility of Greece leaving the Euro should no longer be considered taboo. Other German officials have also been making provocative comments on this subject.

In other words, the pan-Germans dancing to the cacophonous, sterile tune piped by the heirs of the Nazi Abwehr, are now predictably scared out of their wits that Germany itself will be brought down by its own mechanistic hegemony and control strategy, designed to enmesh the satrap European ‘Member States’ in a de facto ‘Greater Germany’.

Actually, Friedrich’s remarks were sharper: specifically, Friedrich said that Greece ‘must seriously consider leaving the Eurozone’ and that this subject ‘should not be taboo’. Obviously it must be many years since Herr Friedrich read the Maastricht Treaty, if he ever read it at all, since the Treaty states unequivocally that state participation in Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) on the basis of ‘irrevocable’ exchange rates, cannot be rescinded – so that once a satrap country has been stupid enough to join, it is stuck, like a dead fly in a spider’s web, until the end of the solar system.

The IMF Press Room learned that officials of the Group of Twenty (which has ‘displaced’ the Group of Seven as part of an earlier Brown operation to close down the G-7-approved transparent Dollar Refunding Programme), were now aware that the entire EMU structure may be in jeopardy, and that Germany itself (which harbours the largest concentration of dud derivatives assets worth zilch in the world, having enthusiastically participated in the Fraudulent Finance racketeering fest only to be double-crossed, as usual, by the Bush Crime fraudsters) faced the prospect of having to cough up 45 billion Euros JUST AS A DOWN PAYMENT, in order to help fund Greece’s emergency rescue package, which looked precariously poised at the end of the Spring Meetings weekend.

At these IMF meetings there is usually one critical issue that swamps everything else, and this time it was Greece. But ‘Greece’ in the prevailing context means the continued coherence of the pan-German/French Economic and Monetary Union project that underpins the EU Collective itself.

If Greece pulls out, other increasingly desperate satrap ‘Member States’, such as Spain, Ireland and Portugal, won’t be far behind; and even France, which also itself holds a colossal store of dud derivatives ‘assets’, may have second thoughts. When the Euro was ‘launched’ in 1999, Dr Hans Tietmeyer, then President of the Bundesbank, was asked point blank whether the Bundesbank had taken the precaution of holding in store an adequate stock of Deutschemark banknotes, against the possibility that the European currency union could collapse.

• Significantly, Dr Tiemeyer would not answer the question.

‘GREEK CONTAGION’ CONFIRMS THE LONG-TERM
EMBEDDED STUPIDITY OF THE PAN-GERMAN DUMKOPFS
At all events, in the run-up to the IMF Spring Meetings, and against a background of confusion which has since been exacerbated by the remarks of Herr Friedrich, contagion was spreading all across southern Europe. Specifically, spreads on ten-year Greek bonds soared to almost 600 basis points over German Bunds in ‘panic trading’, pushing Greek borrowing costs up to 9%, while rates on two-year Greek debt rose to 10.6%. On Monday 26th April, following the absence of any clear indication of a ‘resolution’ of the Greek crisis from the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings, the yield on ten-year Greek Government bonds reached 9.39%, with the spread against ten-year German benchmark bonds (bunds) up to 6.5 percentage points.

Against this background, the IMF’s Managing Director, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, told the press that ‘it’s clear that the Greek situation is a very serious one. There is no silver bullet to solve it in an easy manner’. Credit default Swaps (CDSs) on Portuguese debt surged by 50 basis points within the space of a few hours on 22nd April, to 270, an all-time high, while CDS on Spanish debt reached a new record of 175 basis points. Irish debt CDSs rose to 162, and official bonds issued by Hungary, Bulgaria, Romania, Russia and Argentina rose sharply. Attempts to ‘ring-fence’ Greece appeared to be making little progress; and expectations of some patchwork agreement were expected to leave the frayed financial markets dangerously unimpressed.

While all this was going on, we were being informed by special US sources that the no-holds-barred economic and financial warfare that is now raging, entails an US expectation that the Euro will be destroyed – and that the whole grandiose purpose of the Dodd Bill spewed out by the Senate will be to impose a de facto US dollar dictatorship controlled by the sinister-sounding intelligence cadre within the US Treasury to be known as the Office of Financial Research (OFR).

Since the OFR will report to the US Treasury Secretary, this appointed official will become, by stealth, the actual financial dictator of the whole world – accommodating Fraudulent Finance transactions and open-ended permissive financing and racketeering both above and below the radar, and presiding over a rapidly accelerating domestic and global inflation which will make the Weimar Republic a pleasant memory by comparison.

All because these criminals are jealous of ANY competition, and have refused to contemplate the CORRECT COURSE, agreed four years ago by the Group of Seven Financial Powers (which is why the G-7 has been swamped by the G-20) – namely, transparent, on-the-books Dollar Refunding in the private sector delivering windfall tax accruals onto the US Treasury’s books, offsetting the escalating ‘background’ debt and placing the US Treasury‘s finances on an even keel after a century of uncontrolled deficit-financing profligacy. The US Treasury has a DEATH WISH.

THE WANTA MONEY-STEALING ROUTE RESURRECTED
On 21st April, ‘Princess Paula’, purporting to be sovereign of the fake ‘Principality of Snake Hill’ outside Sydney, was interviewed on BBC-5 Live. This new aberration sent a loud signal to ‘the interested’ that the original criminal intention of diverting funds via the virtual ‘Central Bank of Snake Hill’, which doesn’t exist but which has a Washington, DC, telephone number that ‘just happens’ to be that of the French Embassy in the US capital, was still ‘live’ – even though we have long since debunked the ‘Principality of Snake Hill’ deception as a criminalist operation focused around the renegade felon and deceiver, Lee/Leo Wanta, the courier between George Bush Sr. and President Gorbachëv, and who grew up in Wisconsin with (guess who?) Richard B. Cheney.

• FACT: The use of a French Embassy-provided DC phone number for this Wanta scam is highly revealing. President Sarkozy’s half-brother, Olivier (‘Oliver’), is a senior figure within George Bush Sr.’s money laundry, Carlyle Group. So the French Embassy appears to be a co-conspirator in this fallback contingency plan to seize and divert funds on disbursement for the illicit benefit of the Carlyle operation. As previously stressed, France covers for Germany under the 1963 bilateral.

First of all, the documents that we hold showing Princess Paula having awarded this or that ‘title’ carry a signature which is identical to that of Lee/Leo Wanta (many samples of whose handwriting we possess in our files).

Secondly, you will recall that in a key (23rd September) update to our report dated 20th September 2009 (and in subsequent reprises of that report) we proved that the ‘Principality of Snake Hill ‘is a fraudulent virtual operation lacking all substance, and that the Principality does not exist.

Specifically, we reported as follows:

On Wednesday 23rd September 2009, our Irish friend and associate, Mr Richard Sharpe, obtained independent confirmation from Ms. Brenda Farrell, of the Australian Embassy in Dublin, that ‘The Principality of Snake Hill’ does not exist, thereby reconfirming that the entire ‘Snake Hill’ operation is FRAUDULENT. This is obvious from all the evidence: but we gained OFFICIAL CONFRIMATION.

• This definitively destroys the bona fides and reputations of the poseurs and serial deception operatives that we have exposed, and should terminate the destructive activities of these people once and for all. They are FINISHED. They have been CAUGHT OUT. Before the whole world.

The email from the Australian Embassy in Dublin, dated 23rd September 2009, reads as follows:

Forwarded message
From: <richardsharpe@eircom.net>
Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:25 PM
Subject: Fwd: Principality of Snake Hill [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
To: mrrichardsharpe <mrrichardsharpe@gmail.com>

richardsharpe@eircom.net wrote:
Many thanks for your timely response.

Regards
Richard

“Austremb Dublin” <Austremb.Dublin@dfat.gov.au> wrote:

Dear Mr Sharpe,

Thank you for your email.

There is no principality in Australia.

Kind regards

Australian Embassy
Dublin
Tel: +353 (0) 1 664 5300
Fax: +353 (0) 1 678 5185

richardsharpe@eircom.net

Thirdly, if you revisit our report dated 20th September 2009, you will see that we comprehensively debunked and ridiculed all the fake non-existent dummy ‘officials’ with invented and risible names supposedly forming the ‘Government of the Principality of Snake Hill’ – demonstrating the entire operation to represent a crude virtual fabrication, originally intended not just to engineer a virtual conduit enabling funds to be diverted via Wanta’s signature through the virtual central bank into (we now realise) the hands of the Carlyle Group via the corrupt French Embassy thanks to Olivier (Oliver) Sarkozy being a senior executive with Bush Sr.’s money-laundering Carlyle Group, but also as an entrapment mechanism enabling authorities to move in after the funds had been diverted and to ‘take down’ those unwittingly involved, including Wanta himself no doubt.

In the fourth place, you will also recall that we publicised the typically odious letter to the Editor of this service dated 18th September 2009 from one of Mr Wanta’s CIA lawyers, Thomas E. Henry – a foul individual who, in a three-way conversation between the Editor, Wanta and himself several years ago, thought it appropriate to tell a dirty joke about Jesus Christ – in which Henry (known as ‘Mr Nasty’) stated that he had been directed by ‘Leo/Lee Wanta and representatives from the Principality of Snake Hill’ to make demands on the Editor of this service as stated in that letter.

In the fifth place, you may recall that in response we asked Mr Henry to provide us inter alia with copies of the necessary official authority issued by the US Secretary of State (Mrs Hillary Clinton) proving that Wanta is, as he claims, accepted by the US Government (the Obama Administration) as the Ambassador to the United States for the Principality of Snake Hill.

Mr Henry could not provide any such documentation, of course, since none exists; and when we were able to prove definitively that ‘The Principality of Snake Hill’ does not exist because ‘there are no principalities in Australia’ (as every schoolboy except that felon up in the boonies) knows, Mr Nasty of course vanished from sight like a nasty smell.

Yet now, all of a sudden, on 24th April 2010, long after ‘The Principality of Snake Hill’ deception and of Wanta’s participation and sponsorship of this typically crude and ignorant fabrication has been debunked and consigned to the trash, a signal is heard in London to the effect that the operative calling herself ‘Princess Paula’ is ‘alive and well’, and speaking to some ill-informed BBC-5 Live character to a British audience which necessarily has no possible clue about the background to this discredited US criminal intelligence operation.

What this signalled to US was an intent, notwithstanding the above, for the funds to be diverted on payout via the French Embassy (remember again that France and Germany remain locked together under the terms of the indefinite Treaty of the Elyseé) on behalf of the operatives whom Mr Wanta serves, headed by George W. Bush Sr.

Futhermore, as late as 13th March 2010 ‘Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta’ sent an email received in the UK at 17:34 hrs in which he again displayed himself fraudulently as ‘Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary’, Lee Emil Wanta, The Principality of Snake Hill, Postal Box No. 488, Baulkham Hills, NSW 2153; Telefon [in German]: 202 379 2904 ext 001. As noted, the Washington, DC, 202 area code phone number is provided by the French Embassy.

This email contained an attachment which a UK forensic expert declared to us to be ‘riddled with code’. The email was sent, like so many other Wanta fabrications, to the FDCI Chairwoman Sheila Bair, to the White House, to ‘First Lady Michelle Obama’, to Attorney General Eric Holder, to Peter Mandelson MP (indicating, typically, that Wanta has no idea that Mandelson ceased to be an MP years ago, spent time as a European Commissioner in Brussels, and was hauled back and ennobled to serve Gordon Brown, so that his correct title these days is LORD Mandelson), ‘Chairman Paul A. Volcker’ ,and all sorts of other figures whose staff will have shoved the email immediately into the trash. The email was signed off , like other such Wanta missives, on a diversionary false-religiosity note: ‘Blessed be God in His Angels and His Saints’, attributed to St Anthony.

Faced with these continuing insults to everyone’s intelligence, we have decided that now is the time to expose the FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT perpetrated against the Editor of this service by Lee/Leo Wanta and another of his devious CIA lawyers, Steven D. Goodwin (born in Düsseldorf, see) of Richmond, VA, in respect of the STEALING of the Editor’s bona fide loan of $35,000.

SUMMARY OF THE EDITOR’S ‘WANTA INITIATIVE’
The background, briefly, to this matter, which of course again proves that Wanta is a crook and a financial terrorist, is as follows. After several years of quite hazardous research, in the course of which the Editor – whose job it is to inform our subscribers about what may be going on behind the financial scenes, not just to regurgitate what they can read in the newspapers – had become aware in outline of the endemic financial corruption; and assisted by the Editor’s ongoing knowledge of Soviet developments arising from his editorship of Soviet Analyst, the Editor also became aware of Wanta and managed to discover where he was located.

In 2004, the Editor sent a note to Wanta asking him to call the Editor’s cellphone at 2:30pm (on 23rd May 2004). The Editor had travelled by air to Eau Claire and had hired a taxi for a number of hours at the regional airport. On arrival in Chippewa Falls, the town where Mr Wanta resides, the Editor asked the taxi to pull into a derelict parking lot. At 2:30pm the Editor’s mobile phone rang, and the Editor informed Wanta that he would be at his front door in five minutes. On arrival at the location, the door was opened, and the character illustrated in Claire Sterling’s book ‘Thieves’ World’ (3) (following page 192) opened it. The Editor had hired a taxi at the airport for three hours and had asked the driver to keep the engine running ready to leave instantly should this be necessary.

The Editor recorded an interview with the grossly overweight Mr Wanta for three hours, but as the accent he spoke in was so peculiar, some of what he said has remained almost incomprehensible to this day. Nevertheless, the Editor maintained contact and in the first quarter of 2005, Mr Wanta suggested that the Editor should contact (his CIA) Attorney Steven Goodwin in Richmond, VA.

• It has since transpired, of course, that this was a set-up.

Because during dinner in Richmond (which the Editor paid for) Mr Steven Goodwin related how he had negotiated an arrangement with the Wisconsin Department of Corrections whereby if a certain sum of money was paid (restitution plus fees), the Department would use its best endeavours to procure the termination of Mr Wanta’s probation, which was otherwise scheduled to be terminated on 28th November 2010. Obviously, Goodwin was subliminally suggesting that the Editor himself should provide the necessary funds for this purpose.

After careful consideration for many weeks, and well aware that this was probably a deception, the Editor decided that if further progress was to be made in destabilising and exposing the financial criminality which by now he realised from accumulated materials and research was corrupting the whole world, he needed to remain ‘inside’ the tent, notwithstanding that the entire tent floor area was covered with writhing snakes. He therefore ultimately decided to provide a sum of money from private funds acquired from a successful sale of our London home ($35,000) for the purpose.

Goodwin revealed himself to be dodgy from the outset – failing on several occasions to send the necessary documents, raising early questions in the Editor’s mind as to the man’s bona fides.

In the end, the Editor travelled to Eau Claire again, this time staying overnight, and appeared at the Wanta location on 9th June 2005 inter alia to conduct a further interview and to sign the necessary loan documents, which Goodwin had failed to send to the Editor in advance for his perusal. The Editor was not accompanied by a lawyer, so the risk of being scammed was high.

On arrival, Mr Wanta looked somewhat awkward and nervous, but typically arrogant, and basically motioned the Editor to sit down and to ‘sign here’ without any further ado. The Editor looked at the documents and felt most uncomfortable, and for some minutes debated in his mind whether to get up and walk out. Then he thought that if Wanta and Goodwin were indeed engaged in a scam, the Editor had the means and resolve to expose their duplicity. On this occasion, too, there was no waiting taxi, as Wanta had stated that he would drive the Editor back to the hotel.

Faced with this situation, the Editor signed the Escrow Agreement which according to Wanta would be countersigned by Goodwin after receipt of the Editor’s funds – the Editor remaining motivated by the necessity of having to continue the research from ‘within the tent’, or at least a small corner of it, and by a belief that if this was indeed a typical Wanta scam, the truth of the matter could then be used later to appropriate effect. Which we are doing now.

WANTA-GOODWIN FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT AGAINST THE EDITOR UNDER DURESS
And as it turns out [see below], the loan documents were fraudulent, involving FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT of the Editor by Wanta and Goodwin UNDER DURESS.

The documents were/are as follows:

PROMISSORY NOTE
US DOLLARS 35,000.00
JUNE 19TH, 2005

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, promises to pay to the order of Christopher Story, the sum of THIRTY FIVE THOUSAND AND 00/100 US Dollars with interest at the rate of seven percent (7%) per annum thereon, the principal being payable, without offset, at [address] World Reports Limited, 108 Horseferry Road, Westminster, London SW1P 2EF, United Kingdom, or at such other place as the holder may designate in writing with payments to begin 365 days from date of this Note and due in full 730 days thereafter.

The payment of the principal balance of this Note may be prepaid in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, without penalty.

This Note may be accelerated upon the death of any maker or at the option of the holder so that all remaining principal and accrued interest shall be payable upon the later of 30 days after the date of any maker’s or Guarantor’s death or 15 days after the holder provides written notice to the maker at its principal place of business that the holder is exercising his right to accelerate the amounts due hereunder. In the event of default in the payment of any amount due under this Note, the holder may declare the entire unpaid balance, principal and interest, to be immediately due and payable and thereafter may exercise any remedies provided by applicable law.

The holder of this Note shall have the right to enforce any one or more available remedies in whole or in part, successively or concurrently.

The maker of this Note waives presentment, protest, and notice of dishonour; agrees that an extension or extensions of the time of payment of this Note, or any installment or part thereof, may be made before, at or after maturity by agreement with anyone or more of the parties to this Note without notice to and without releasing the liability of the other party under this Note regardless of which parties are notified of the extension or extensions; waives the benefit of all exemptions as to the debt evidence of this Note and any right which it may have to require the holder to proceed against any person; and agrees to pay all the expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees, in collecting this Note, or any installment or part thereof, which is not paid when due.

[Signed]: Lee E. Wanta.

Address of Notice [added in Wanta’s handwriting]:
C/o Goodwin Sutton & DuVal, Plc.
Old City Hall, Ste No. 350
1001 East Broad Street
Richmond, VA, USA (23219).

Separately the Editor was handed by Wanta the text of an ESCROW AGREEMENT FOR SIGNING BY GOODWIN WHEN THE FUNDS WERE SUPPLIED, as follows:

ESCROW AGREEMENT
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA
Date: 14th July, 2005

TO: Steven D. Goodwin, Trustee for the benefit of Ambassador Leo* E. Wanta [*NOT: Lee E. Wanta]:

The undersigned maker, Christopher Story, does hereby acknowledge that he is placing certain funds in the amount of THIRTY FIVE THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($35,000) into Escrow with Steven D. Goodwin, a discreet and professional attorney-at-law, for the sole and exclusive purpose as stated herein and under the following terms:

1. Said funds shall be used to pay the amount of $30,551.97 to satisfy the court ordered obligations in Wisconsin Case No. 92CF683.
2. Any and all remaining amounts shall be distributed only as directed by Ambassador Leo E. Wanta, to be used for the benefit of, and at the direction of, Ambassador Wanta.

The parties herein acknowledge that the funds paid to, and held in Escrow by, Steven D. Goodwin, under this Agreement are the same funds referenced in a Note in the amount of THIRTY FIVE THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($35,000) made by Ambassador Leo E. Wanta for the benefit of Christopher Story.

[Signed]: Christopher Story, maker [SEAL]

I, the undersigned Trustee, agree to receive, hold and distribute the funds referenced herein upon the terms and conditions stated above.

[Signed]: Steven D. Goodwin, Trustee [SEAL].

FEATURES OF THE FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT SCAM
AGAINST THE EDITOR PERPETRATED BY WANTA AND GOODWIN
These documents represent Fraud in the Inducement because:

(1): The Promissory Note has to reference the Escrow Agreement and vice versa. In neither case does this occur. Specifically:

(2): The Promissory Note does not reference the Escrow Agreement.

(3): The Escrow Agreement does NOT reference the Promissory Note. It references ‘a Note’, which could be ANY NOTE. The reference has to be specific, which is not the case.

(4): The Promissory note dated 9th June 2005 is signed by Lee E. Wanta.

(5): The Escrow Agreement references an ‘Ambassador Leo E. Wanta’ making no reference to ‘Lee E. Wanta’. This operative uses two names for obfuscation purposes [DUPLICATION, DIALECTICAL METHODOLOGY: see our repeated reminders that this is the standard modus operandi].

(6): This divergence of names for Wanta widens the fraudulent separation of the Promissory Note from the Escrow Agreement.

(7): Mr Wanta is NOT an Ambassador. To be styled Ambassador, it is necessary to be supported by official credentials issued by the US State Department and renewed by each successive American Administration, confirming that the United States (in this case) recognises that the said individual concerned is an accredited Ambassador. In the case of Mr Wanta’s supposed Ambassadorship for Somalia to Switzerland and Canada, the same criteria apply. Each successive Government of the countries concerned must provide the necessary consent and official acknowledgement of such a person’s status and acceptance as Ambassador. Wanta cannot show such credentials, because this felon’s claims to be an Ambassador are fraudulent and part of his disintegrating cover.

In the United States, there is a convention that a former Ambassador can continue to be adderssed as Ambassador. However Mr Wanta styles himself ‘Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary’, Lee Emil Wanta, The Principality of Snake Hill, representing fraudulently that he is the Ambassdaor for the non-existent, cirtual and farudulent ‘Principality’, which is FRAUD.

And as indicated above, when Mr Henry was asked to provide the necessary credentials in respect of Wanta’s spurious (fake) Principality of Snake Hill Ambassadorship to the United States, he was of course unable to comply and was himself therefore exposed as an egregious liar and a fraudster for that reason, and because he stated that he was acting for Leo/Lee Wanta and representatives from ‘The Principality of Snake Hill’, which does not exist.

Mr Steven D. Goodwin likewise fraudulently referenced a spurious ‘Ambassador Leo E. Wanta’ in the Escrow Agreement, thereby exposing himself as a liar and a perpetrator of fraud, as well.

(8): Steven D Goodwin is therefore NOT ‘a discreet and professional attorney-at-law’ but rather a fellow-fraudster with Mr Leo E. Wanta, a.k.a. Lee E. Wanta. Both engaged in gross FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT under duress of this Editor, who was not accompanied by a lawyer. Goodwin should be disciplined, debarred and appropriately dealt with both by his profession and by the authorities.

(9): As for Wanta, this case provides further irrefutable PROOF that Wanta is a serial, unrepentant, continuing felon. His felonious status has NOT been altered and he is NOT therefore in a position to own a bank account.

(10): Any funds remitted to Leo E. Wanta or Lee E. Wanta, who handles stolen funds and has STOLEN this Editor’s loan funds plus interest through this inducement fraud, will be at risk. Any party engaged in effecting such a remittance to Wanta, however styled, knowing this background, may place themselves in a situation demanding investigation involving the conveyance of funds into or via the hands of a criminal operative.

WANTA NOW IDENTIFED AS ‘GREAT DARK LORDS’ TERRORIST
As we have had to report herefrom time to time, we have been plagued since February 2008 with extremely unpleasant, often obscene, hateful voicemail messages from a loony-toon calling himself a representative of the ‘Great Dark Lords’. This nutter spiels well-worn demonic claptrap, exposed in part in the Editor’s book The New Underworld Order, mingled with overt homosexual allusions and obscene New Age rants augmented by propaganda to the general effect that the ‘Dark Forces’ are taking over the world, there is nothing you can do about it and ‘you should drop your stupid Christianity’. In other words, the message is the Leninist revolutionary one that the Dark Forces’ success is ‘inevitable’ (the reverse of which is of course the case, as everything they do fails).

In recent months this harassment became so excessive that we took the decision to close down our landlines in the United States, and partially in London as well. We discovered that the calls were being made via our 1-800 number which has effectively been stolen, so WE are being illegally charged to put up with these open-ended obscenities and abuse.

Originally we thought that a corrupt US Psy-Ops cadre was seeking to harass and destabilise the Editor of these services (mindlessly proving, of course, our effectiveness). However since the false voice has never changed, having been consistent throughout for more than two years, it has become apparent that just ONE individual is responsible for this criminal activity.

We have concluded that this individual is the discredited felon Wanta for the following reasons:

• We have recently learned that he has a voice alteration unit which scrambles and alters voice messages, a technique used by criminal intelligence operatives. We didn’t know this until very recently. Had we known this earlier, the present conclusions would have been reached earlier.

• As indicated, the voice is always the same fake altered voice, so there is only one ‘loony-toon’ doing this: Wanta, masquerading as a demonic, homosexual loony-toon.

• This harassment started when severance with Wanta was in process in the first quarter of 2008. It has continued ever since, without a break until we severed the landlines..

• The harassment was especially intense during the Editor’s weeks in New York in March. Wanta is in a position to ascertain the Editor’s movements.

• Wanta, stuck in Chippewa Falls, has time on his hands and has nothing to do other than to dream up fantasies such as the ‘Snake Hill’ deception – via decaying websites very appropriately using the image of the serpent as the motif for that deception operation.

• Wanta ‘works for’ George Bush Sr., facilitating his financial thefts and scams; and Bush Sr. and members of his family are steeped in the Bavarian occult, taking pleasure in rejoicing in evil.

• As exposed in our report dated 20th September 2009, Wanta’s religiosity, like his patriotism, is fake. Not only does he protest too much, but his absurd play-acting when he arrived an hour and a half late for a meeting with the Editor in 2005 and proffered as his excuse that he had been ‘doing his devotions’, i.e. praying to the Virgin Mary, which he tried to emphasise by showing the Editor a tattered piece of paper containing some religious text – confirmed that he is a religious fraud just as he is a fraud in all other respects as well, including his ‘wrapping himself in the flag’ cover.

• Analysis of the structure of phrases and sentences employed by the harassment terrorist in his obscene and demented voicemails reveals close parallels with Mr Wanta’s way of speaking. It is all ‘Black’ play-acting, of course.

• The harassment could only be sustained by a party who was unable to exert any control over the target (the Editor), who lacked the means to procure others to achieve that objective, and who was therefore consequently nervous and in a permanent state of uncontrolled anger, not knowing what to do next. So he had the ongoing motive to resort to, and to persist with, this dirty and extremely crude Psy-Ops activity, which he could easily undertake as he has access to the necessary voice modification equipment in Chippewa Falls, and all the time in the world at his disposal.

• In addition to the obscene and evil phone calls and voicemail messages, this terrorist resorts also to unpleasant, often likewise obscene, emails. No email address source is ever given, and the false provenance of these emails is varied with every such communication. This crass flexibility is characteristic of an intel-linked operation.

• On 6th March 2008, Wanta telephoned the Editor and, using his ‘FBI persona’, started reciting, in a bombastic tone of voice, various US Statutes to which the Editor, who is not a US citizen and not subject to US jurisdiction externally, must comply. The Editor told him to cease and desist and to stop making an idiot of himself, whereupon Wanta screamed:

‘YOU HAVE DESTROYED EVERYTHING’.

• Accordingly, the Editor learned with satisfaction that our exposures had, indeed, completely detabilised operations with which Mr Wanta was associated. Wanta was the courier between Bush Sr. and Gorbachëv, who are partners in Deutsche AG (Barrington Investment Group), located at St Gallen, Switzerland, along with Dr Helmut Kohl (an equally nasty piece of work: see our exposure details on Kohl in the preceding report).

By ‘EVERYTHING’, Wanta meant that the entire Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD) subversion and ‘take-down’ operation run through the Bush Crime Syndicate had now been destabilised as a consequence of these exposures. When embarking upon the course described above in 2005, the Editor experienced a powerful sense that the course he was about to follow would indeed lead to the progressive unravelling of the foreign-derived subversion-by-corruption offensive against the United States: and that is indeed what has happened.

THE FAILING ‘COUP D’ETAT BY INSTALLMENTS’
Wanta has been stuck up in the Wisconsin boonies for the convenience of the Bush Sr.-DVD Fifth Column that has tried to destabilise and destroy the American Republic – an offensive from within, and a clandestine ‘coup d’état by installments’ perpetrated on a scale with no historical precedent. He has remained at their beck and call, trying to ingratiate himself with the serpents in question, because they need his signature to enable them to divert and steal the funds over which Wanta’s signature may ostensibly relate.

When it came to stealing Michael C. Cottrell’s contract, the Bush-Ackermann-DVD cadres simply, as we have reported, forged Mr Cottrell’s signature electronically. As so many examples of Wanta’s signature exist, his continued survival cannot be related exclusively to the fact that ‘they need his signature’. However, as the DVD offensive against the United States and Britain is progressively neutralised, and further destabilised, which is what has been triggered, and is happening, Wanta’s usefulness as a supplicating snake serving the nest of vipers will have passed its sell-by date.

THE NSA/CIA/USAF HANDLER OF WANTA’S PROMOTER
Finally, as these exposures have unfolded, this Editor has been viciously attacked from time to time by a notorious controlled US fabricator and peddler of lies on behalf of Wanta, styling himself as an ‘intelligence expert’, named Thomas Heneghan. We have reported separately that Heneghan was authorised, by Wanta, according to documents we hold, to open one or more bank accounts for Marvelous Investments, a vehicle reportedly used inter alia for the financing of Al-Qaeda.

The veteran criminal politics and finance observer Tim White (4) has informed this service that Thomas Heneghan’s disinformation handler is NSA/CIA/USAF Lieutenant General Otis C. Johnson. Concerning this proven criminalist operative (Johnson), The SEC News Digest dated 21st May 1986 reported [page 1] as follows:

Complaint Filed against Otis C. Johnson: The Los Angeles Regional Office [of the SEC] filed a complaint on May 6 in the US District Court for the District of Colorado against Otis C. Johnson seeking a permanent injunction and other equitable relief for violations of the antifraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The complaint in question alleges that Johnson defrauded N.D. Resources, Inc. (NDR) and its public shareholders. Specifically, the complaint alleges that Johnson provided NDR with a false geological report concerning certain mining claims and, after NDR had entered into a joint venture with an accomplice of Johnson in order to develop the claims, conspired to provide positive drilling reports to NDR when, in fact, no drilling had been done. The complaint further alleges that Johnson sold approximately 240,353 shares of NDR common stock while the stock price was inflated as a result of press releases issued by NDR concerning the drilling reports. [SEC v. Otis C. Johnson, DCO, Civil Action NO 86-945 (LR-11105)].

The SEC News Digest dated 10TH July 1989 reported [page 1] as follows:

Otis C. Johnson enjoined: The Los Angeles Regional Office announced that on June 22 Judge Lewis T. Babcock, US District Court for the District of Colorado, signed an Order of Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief against Otis C. Johnson. The Order enjoins Johnson from future violations of the antifraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Order directs Otis C. Johnson to disgorge his profits from sales of N.D. Resources, Inc. (NDR), which disgorgement is waived based upon the truth, accuracy and completeness of Johnson’s sworn representations concerning his present inability to pay disgorgement. Johnson consented to the Order without admitting or denying the allegations of wrongdoing in the Complaint.

The Complaint alleges that Johnson defrauded NDR and its public shareholders by, among other things, providing NDR with a false geological report concerning certain mining claims and further conspiring to provide positive drilling reports to the company when, in fact, no drilling had been done, and by selling approximately 240,353 shares of the company’s stock while the stock price was inflated as a result of press releases concerning the drilling reports. [SEC v. Otis C. Johnson, DCO, Civil Action No. 87-B-1693 (LR-12149)].

The SEC News Digest dated 24th August 1992 reported [page 4] as follows:

Otis Johnson III Pleads Guilty: The Commission and Michael J. Norton, US Attorney for the District of Colorado, announced that on July 20, 1992, Otis C. Johnson III (Johnson) of Denver, Colorado, pleaded guilty to two criminal informations. The first such information, filed May 20, 1992, charged violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, conspiracy to commit mail fraud and securities fraud in the purchase and sale of the securities of Corporate Quest, Inc. (Corporate Quest). The second information, filed July 20, 1992, charged violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, conspiracy to commit mail fraud, wire fraud, and interstate transportation of stolen property, in the purchase and sale of the securities of United Financial Operations (United Financial).

Johnson admitted in his plea agreement that in 1987 and 1988 [that] he participated in schemes to manipulate and conduct fraudulent transactions in the securities of United Financial and Corporate Quest. Johnson also admitted that he and co-conspirators conducted prearranged trades through controlled and nominee accounts and paid for the trades in Corporate Quest’s securities with worthless checks totaling approximately $313,000. As a result of the co-conspirators’ activities, four brokerage firms lost approximately $262,000.

Johnson is scheduled to be sentenced on September 21, 1992 at 9:00 a.m. [U.S. v. Otis C. Johnson III, Criminal Action No. 92-CR-181, U.S.D.C. Colo. (LR-13345)].

• NSA/CIA/USAF Lieutenant General Otis C. Johnson III did NOT do jail time.

• The penalty for wire fraud in the United States is TWENTY YEARS PER COUNT.

Notes and References:
(1): ‘Thirty Days: Hitler’s Thirty Days to Power: January 1933’, Henry Ashby Turner, Jr., Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, New York etc., 1996, ISBN 0-201-40714-0, page 164.

(2): ‘Coup d’état by installments’, precisely accurate characterization of pan-German power-grabbing methodology. Konrad Heiden, Der Fuehrer, Boston, MA, 1944, page 597.

(3): ‘Thieves’ World: The Threat of the New Global Network of Organized Crime’, Claire Sterling, Simon and Schuster, new York, ISBN 0-671-74997-8, 1994.

(4): Original SEC documents researched and supplied pro bono publico by Tim White.

• Note: The discredited controlled disinformation operative Heneghan has reponded to the foregoing exposure with further lies, publishing a deliberately distorted picture of this Editor and stating, sensibly, that he won’t be responding to what we have published. Very sensible of him.

Subsequent Add-Ons and Updates:

PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD THAT WE EXPOSED BLEW UP IN THEIR FACES
We now understand that as a direct result of our exposure of the Pennsylvania Department of State’s connivance in the deliberate, fraudulent insertion of the Mafioso Salvatore R. DeFrancesco as ‘Secretary’ by the PA Department of State Corporation Bureau on 8th March 2010, and following forceful intervention by Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. with the complacent, arrogant Pennsylvania Department of State authorities resulting in the removal of the Mafioso’s name from Pennsylvania Investments Inc.’s corporate screen by 2.10pm on 10th March, [see ‘The Aborted Pennsylvania Fraud of 8 March 2010’, report of 19th March: Archive], that officially sponsored attempt to divert payout funds due to Mr Cottrell’s firm and to steal the $6.2 trillion loan money, collapsed.

• Instead, the reverberations of this criminal outrage presided over by the official kleptocracy spread all the way up the food chain, blowing up in the faces of Vice President Joseph Biden and his predecessor, Richard B. Cheney.

That operation represented a brazen attempt by the organised crime elements both outside and within the craven US Administration to divert the funds, just as the continued slitherings of the Wanta ‘snake’ betray an intent somehow to reactivate that discredited conduit. We now know that Wanta’s AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. operation actually represented a scheme to procure the transfer of funds into the hands of the Bush Crime Syndicate, whom Mr Wanta serves, as explained in the aforementioned forensic report. Recently, one or more checks drawn on AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., have surfaced, and a recipient of such a check recently was told to go straight to the police.

We further understand that our exposure in the current report of Wanta’s Fraud in the Inducement under duress of this Editor to steal his $35,000 loan money, facilitated by the complicit CIA lawyer Steven Goodwin, has also severely curtailed the potential for any ‘Wanta route’ to be activated. All holes that these serpents thought they could slither through, are blocked.

• However the Pennsylvania Department of State Corporation Bureau, having banked Mr Cottrell’s required $70 filing fee accompanied by the proper PA official form requiring the individual display of his corporate offices, so as to preclude any further demented attempt to steal funds by this route, continues its intransigent and complicit failure to make the necessary formal amendments to his corporation’s corporate screen with the PA Department of State Corporation Bureau.

Such intransigence simply tightens the noose round the necks of every snake involved in this attempted scam, from Vice President Biden and Edward G. Rendell, Governor of Pennsylvania, all the way down to the named officials within the PA structures who presided over and facilitated this intended giga-theft. Instead of putting the matter right, which would take five minutes, the arrogant apparatchiks concerned prefer to leave the needed correction unattended to, no doubt hoping we would ‘go away’. This is a reminder that we haven’t gone away and that this website is capable of shaking the ground beneath the soles of the feet of the Vice President of the United States and the Governor of Pennsylvania any time they like.

BRITISH ELECTION: EXIT GORDON BROWN VIA BIGOTGATE
The expedition of the Prime Ministerial caravan to Rochdale on 27th April so that Gordon Brown could be televised for electoral purposes meeting some ‘real people’ (as opposed to the surreal people in Westminster and Downing Street) concluded predictably in disaster for the beleaguered Prime Minister, who may have forgotten that those people ‘oop nerth’ are blunt, speak their mind, and are not to be messed with. Once he’d climbed back into the assumed safety of his limo, Brown forgot the standard dirty trick, often used by intelligence services (especially in the United States), of ensuring that a lapel microphone stays live after a televised encounter.

Gordon Brown’s characterisation of the Rochdale lady as ‘a sort of bigoted woman’ resulted in the airwaves at home and abroad being jammed with the resulting tape, while relieving tired and jaded journalists of having to talk about the boring minutiae of British politics for a while.

As one pundit put it, he wouldn’t have liked to be the upholstery in the limo when Brown found out about his blunder. However Andrew Rawnsley, author of a book called ‘The End of the Party’ which contains graphic details of Brown’s tantrums (cups and mobile phones being chucked across the room, aides being grabbed by the lapel, etc. etc.), has pointed out that the catastrophe could have been much worse. When Brown gets angry, i.e. for much of the time, most of his vocabulary turns navy blue. One is reminded of the fact that the efficiently organised ancient Jerusalem had a Dung Gate. Gordon will be exiting the New Jerusalem which never materialised under his failed tenure, let alone that of his duplicitous predecessor, via Bigotgate.

• Gordon Brown’s behaviour while holding the highest office reconfirms that life at the highest level is hell on earth. Perceptive north American correspondents have pointed out to us that they have caught occasional glimpses of FEAR in the faces of both Barack Obama and Canadian Prime Minister Harper. This reflects the reality that these people are controlled, live in an environment of implied threats and fear, and have discovered that having lusted for so long for what they thought was supreme power, the chalice they have been handed isn’t just poisoned: it reeks as well.

• Finally, note that the Number of the draft Dodd Senate Bill evaluated below, viz: 3217, devolves, surprise, surprise and yet again surprise, to the ‘Black’ esoteric, geomasonic numerology number THIRTEEN: 3 + 2 + 1 +7 = 13. Now WHY would that be the case?

MEANWHILE… THE ESSENCE OF THE CRISIS
The central issue facing the whole world is as follows. ALL these securitisation transactions and derivatives marketing operations are FRAUDULENT, and they are ALL illegal both in the US and in the Common Law jurisdictions. So what ALL PARTICIPANTS, whether institutional, hedge funds or investors, fear is that THE WHOLE LOT, BEING FRAUDULENT AND ILLEGAL, COULD UNRAVEL.

Accordingly, the crisis revolves around this huge elephant: how to avoid such an outcome while cleaning up the mess at the same time. The US Treasury’s approach is to continue the carousel below the radar, i.e. covered by Treasury confidentiality, a course which WILL indeed lead to a Weimar-style hyperinflationary collapse.

There is only ONE sound solution, as has been the case all along: the Dollar Refunding operation, ORIGINATED in the private sector, and in London where the US authorities cannot easily sabotage the transactions, which will deliver massive ON-BALANCE SHEET TAX ACCRUALS onto the books of the US Treasury, whether it likes it or not.

The Dollar Refunding operation based on the sovereign loan funds, being ORIGINATED in the private sector, is NOT matched by corresponding debt on the other side of the balance sheet.

By contrast, the US Treasury’s intent is to try to handle the refunding itself, which WOULD create massive offsetting official debt on the other side of the balance sheet. If on-balance sheet tax of, say, 35%, is paid, that leaves 65% of each transaction being added to the official debt, which is CRAZY, and WILL lead to a Weimar-style hyperinflationary currency degradation and collapse.

UPDATE, 29TH APRIL 2010:
FINANCIAL STRESS IN EUROPE: SO BUSH CRIME FAMILY, SOROS AND CARLYLE DEMAND $1.3 TRILLION CORRUPT PAYMENT AS THEIR PRICE FOR CEASING TO IMPEDE THE SETTLEMENTS
As interest rates on two-year Greek bonds soared to 38% on 28th April 2010 at one point, continued intransigence over the Settlements [see this report] was now being more specifically linked to the outrageous and corrupt demand of the still hyperactive Bush Crime Syndicate, George Soros and the Carlyle Group [see below] for a total corrupt pay-off of $1.3 trillion (an aggregate previously trailered by this service as being targeted for stealing, as we then thought, by the criminal CIA: and it may well be the intention for the criminal enterprise CIA to be the channel directing these funds into the hands of the corrupt parties involved).

Quite apart from the disgusting arrogance of these brazen parties in assuming that they, like the US criminal enterprise banks, can blackmail the forces of financial restitution with such a demand, what sticks even more violently in the Editor’s gullet is the flaccid, corrupt, anarchic failure of US law enforcement, Gold Badges et al., to refuse point blank to accommodate such demands, and to
have these financial criminals arrested.

• And for such a gross theft even to be mentioned as a possibility at a time when European countries are going to the wall as a direct consequence of having stupidly accumulated trash, worthless ‘derivatives’ casino ‘assets’ as counterparties to the US official kleptocrats, gives a whole new meaning to the phrase ‘political obscenity’.

Although there is every prospect that, over time, world class criminals like George H. W. Bush Sr., George Bush Jr., Tony Blair et al. will receive their due rewards here on earth rather than just in the underworld to come (with the timebomb of George Bush Sr.’s complicity in the assassination of President Kennedy gathering more and more explosive momentum), the continued failure of US law enforcement to block all further intransigence by these serpents and to have them arrested, like Dr Greenspan and the late Lord George, undermines all residual confidence in relevant US law enforcement personnel. These people have consistently failed to do their job properly. The other day we found out that Greenspan, who has long been indicted by a Grand Jury, was continuing to behave as though he could do and say as he liked, and was not subject to the Rule of Law.

• The Editor is repeatedly told that the relevant law enforcement ‘have to obey orders’, begging the issue that if an order involves illegality, then it is by definition illegal and must be disobeyed.

In case this point isn’t clear, under the Misprision of Felony Statute, it is INCUMBENT upon anyone with knowledge of wrongdoing to take the appropriate steps in accordance with the statute [see text repeated with almost every one of these reports]. That includes operatives AT EVERY LEVEL who have information about wrongdoing that they haven’t reported to the appropriate authorities. It also includes WIVES and FORMER WIVES of such operatives.

When we heard, yet again, that $1.3 trillion of the Settlement funds was to be diverted to the Bush Crime Syndicate, Soros, Carlyle et al., we wondered; WHAT ARE WE SUPPOSED TO DO WITH THIS INFORMATION? Bury it in order to ‘facilitate’ the Settlements? You must be joking. According to our current sense, it has been realised belatedly in certain quarters that the intended stealing of these funds at a time when Greece, Spain, Portugal and probably Britain and Ireland are going down the tubes, might just set off reverberations so lethal that yielding to the gross blackmail demands of the kleptocracy may be too risky, after all.

Certainly, if we do discover that $1.3 trillion has been diverted, as has been confirmed to us is the intention [see below], we shall see to it that this abomination is rammed down the throats of all concerned so that nobody involved in this crime will ever be able to forget how angry the British and American public can become when aroused.

The obscenity of EVEN CONTEMPLATING SUCH A CRIME at a time when the credit ratings of both Spain and Portugal have been downgraded (on 28th April 2010), following Standard and Poor’s consignment of Greek bonds to junk status, is more than your correspondent can take.

• All we can say at this stage is: JUST YOU TRY.

Other than that, the Settlements ‘news’ is not universally negative.

UPDATE: 28TH APRIL 2010: POST-IMF SPRING MEETINGS MELTDOWN
When it became clear that nothing substantive emerged from the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings with regard to Greece, Standard and Poor’s slashed Greece’s credit rating to BB+, junk status, the first time this has occurred since the ill-advised EU Collective Currency arrangements, which we repeatedly warned against in successive articles in International Currency Review (1992-99), was established in order to fulfil the pan-German hegemony/control objective codified in the 1942 Nazi compendium Europaische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft (European Economic Community), the Chapter headings of which were replicated almost verbatim in the 1992 Maastricht Treaty.

The immediate consequence was to drive yields on Greek bonds up beyond 14%, compared with 9.73% on Monday in Europe, amid a cascading collapse of confidence which could tear Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) apart, destroy the Euro, and bring about a collapse in France and Germany, both of which hold vast stores of completely worthless derivatives ‘assets’.

Meanwhile the collapse of confidence and the disintegration of the bond markets fed on itself, affecting every relevant financial market worldwide, as the real pernicious consequences of the open-ended Fraudulent Finance espoused by the United States and driven by the Bush Crime Syndicate, finally hit home. The fact that we have been talking about this since our report dated 2nd September 2005 means that all concerned have had ample time to put matters right: but, as usual, everything has been left too late. And now it’s almost certainly FAR TOO LATE.

At 12:00 hrs UK time on 28th April we learned that lawyers for Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. are in the Far East trying to tie the hands of the Chinese, but that Chinese officials, having absorbed the present report perhaps, are on the verge of putting the boot into the venally corrupt American authorities, by selling Treasuries for starters.

As for the display of ‘Blankfeinism’* presented for televised public consumption inter alia by Lloyd Blankfein, the Goldman Sachs CEO, before Mr Levin’s Congressional Committee, Mr Blankfein’s attempt to appear like a simpleton did not wash with his fellow Jew, a man of considerable integrity who doesn’t like being messed with and having his intelligence insulted.

Since the SEC filed its complaint [see Archive: 18th April 2010], the bell tolls for Goldman Sachs, which thinks it controls the UK financial system inter alia via its grip on Lloyds of London, and through that conduit, on the British Monarchical Power.

But Goldman has been FOUND OUT marketing dud assets, viz: derivative products based upon nothing other than a reference to an asset that does not underpin the derivative at all, which is OUTRIGHT RACKETEERING AND FRAUD, especially in the United States where ALL securitisation is illegal, as is also the case in other Common Law jurisdications [see our reports: ‘Securitisation is 100% illegal under US legislation’: Archive, 10 March 2010; and ‘Definitive illegality of securitisation is reconfirmed’: Archive, 18 April 2010].

THE DOLLAR REFUNDING MUST ORIGINATE IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR
In order for the world to stand any chance of avoiding an irretrievable meltdown which will lead to the worst possible outcomes (outlined below):

• The transparent, on-the-books, fully taxable Dollar Refunding Programme agreed upon four years ago by the Group of Seven (G-7) financial powers using the large sovereign loan funds provided pro bono humanitas by the British Monarchical Power must proceed because the Refunding must be ORIGINATED in the private sector. (No official DEBT on the other side of the balance sheet).

• The structure for accomplishing this has been ready in London since 29th May 2009 and can proceed without any input from the US authorities who are terrified of ‘losing control’ and have been manoeuvring to ORIGINATE the Refunding from within the US Treasury.

• That would be catastrophic, because it presupposes that further open-ended and unnecessary DEBT is accumulated on the other side of the balance sheet, to offset the ‘assets’ made available by the Treasury for the false refunding purpose.

• By contrast, the private sector Dollar Refunding using the sovereign loan funds GENERATES NO DEBT WHATSOEVER but DELIVERS WINDFALL TAX ACCRUALS. As the Refunding will take place in London, the taxes payable to the British and American Governments will be delivered to the UK Treasury, with the US taxes payable by the British Treasury then forwarded on to the US Treasury, whether it likes it or not, as provided for under the Bretton Woods arrangements.

This is the simple, straightforward, transparent, honest, on-the-books, long since AGREED-UPON solution which the Bush Crime Syndicate and its compromised adherents within the US structures, have been resisting, in order to RETAIN CONTROL in the full knowledge that the route they have chosen will lead to hyperinflationary disaster as described in the report below.

Finally, we understand that (possibly, again, following publication of this report), US legislators are ALREADY having second thoughts about the folly of proceeding with the Dodd Senate Bill (with the Democrats facing wipe-out at the forthcoming mid-term elections), while we are also advised that Dr Ben Bernanke, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, has suddenly twigged at last that if he’s not careful, he may preside over the American Weimar Republic. Apparently he has realised that a colossal inflation is in the works anyway, and is starting to come to his senses. But don’t bank on it.

• ‘Blankfeinism’: Play-acting by a perpetrator of financial crimes involving hand-wringing, diversion, obfuscation and invoking spurious arguments in refutation of the perpetrator’s egregious ongoing breaches of the Rule of Law which are crystal clear to everyone except the likes of Lloyd Blankfein.

NOTICES:
Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

Save

DEFINITIVE ILLEGALITY OF SECURITISATION IS RECONFIRMED

cropped-chrisstory

IT IS ILLEGAL TO ASSIGN AN ASSET WITHOUT THE ASSET-OWNERS’S PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION. ALL ENGAGED IN THIS RACKETEERING KNOW IT.

Sunday 18 April 2010 00:01

• ANY CONTRACT ENTERED INTO FOR AN ILLEGAL PURPOSE IS NULL AND VOID

• THE TEXT OF THE S.E.C.’S COMPLAINT AGAINST GOLDMAN SACHS & CO. FILED ON 16TH APRIL 2010 IS AVAILABLE IN THE REPORT ALSO DATED 18TH APRIL. TO ACCESS THE S.E.C. COMPLAINT, PLEASE PRESS ‘BACK TO ARCHIVE’ OR THE ARCHIVE BUTTON [HOME PAGE]. THE REPORT CONTAINS A BRIEF COMMENTARY IN NOTE FORM, THE S.E.C.’S RELATED PRESS RELEASE, AND THE COMPLAINT TEXT. THIS CASE SPECIFICALLY ILLUSTRATES MANY OF THE ISSUES EXPOSED IN THE PRESENT REPORT, WITH DEVASTATING EFFECT AND IMPACT.

• Securitisation is ABSOLUTELY ILLEGAL, and all those talking heads from the City of London and Wall Street who have been treating, for example, the Goldman Sachs scandal (that we warned you about years ago) as just ‘the inevitable fall-out after a period of financial crisis’, rather than the corrupt cause of the crisis, are KNOWINGLY MISLEADING THE GENERAL PUBLIC EXACTLY LIKE GOLDMAN SACHS, CITIBANK, BANK OF AMERICA, WACHOVIA, WELLS FARGO and the other US and foreign financial enterprises engaged in this racketeering. Which the IMF CONDONES.

And before you start shouting at the screen, if you’re reading this from Wall Street or the City of London, or from within the IMF and the World Bank, why don’t you pay attention to the fact that the Notes and References, as originally published in our journal Economic Intelligence Review, run to FIVE AND A HALF PAGES. SECURITISATION IS ABSOLUTELY ILLEGAL: AND THEY KNOW IT.

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

• AS PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED, OUR LANDLINES REMAIN CLOSED BECAUSE OF UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT. WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL OR THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

EDITOR’S INTRODUCTION:
That Asset-Backed Securitisation [ABS] is fraudulent has been amply demonstrated by our website reports, in this service and in successive issues of International Currency Review. In the following uncompromising analysis, Mr Michael Nwogugu CPA, who is based in Maryland, demonstrates with pinpoint technical proficiency how accurate this assessment has been – inspired for our part inter alia by the US securities and technical expertise of Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S.

The author has looked at securitisation from every legal angle, and finds securitisation under US law to be absolutely illegal, with no redeeming features whatsoever.

Given this state of affairs, it would damage the integrity of the English language to observe that it is astonishing that, far from paying attention to this glaring state of affairs, US investment banks, intermediaries, organised criminal syndicates, Intelligence Power cadres, officials in high places, and their counterparties abroad, further encouraged inter alia by the railroading behaviour of the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC), have been proceeding to gear up for ‘business as usual’ securitisation operations as though there had been no discontinuity.

In addition to being ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. LAW, securitisation is ILLEGAL UNDER COMMON LAW. If the prior written permission of the mortgagor (or other type of asset-holder) has not been obtained in writing, and in such a manner that the party IS FULLY AWARE THAT THEY HAVE GRANTED SUCH PERMISSION, the transfer and all subsequent transactions are ILLEGAL.

• Moreover, the legal axiom that ‘the money you make from exploitaing and abusing my money is my money’ likewise applies. PLUS:

• ANY CONTRACT ENTERED INTO FOR AN ILLEGAL PURPOSE IS NULL AND VOID.

Self-evidently, this study focuses on the US legal position. But the same basic principles apply in all Common Law Countries. So far, the talking heads in the so-called ‘Mainstream’ Media’ have chosen to ignore the fact that securitisation is ILLEGAL. Reality will soon be catching up with them, just as it is at last catching up with the likes of Goldman Sachs and other ‘protected’ enterprises.

REPRODUCED FROM:
ECONOMIC INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, VOLUME 12, NUMBERS 7 & 8, FIRST QUARTER 2010: pages 4-21. World Reports Limited, 108 Horseferry Road, Westminster, London SW1P 2EF, UK.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY [REPRODUCED FROM OUR REPORT DATED 10TH MARCH 2010]:

WHY SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. AND COMMON LAW
Securitisation is illegal under US legislation – primarily because it is fraudulent and causes specific violations of R.I.C.O., usury, Antitrust and bankruptcy laws. And it flies in the face of public policy in numerous ways, as was expounded in extensive detail in this analysis published in our journal Economic Intelligence Review 2009Q1 with several pages of book, article and case references.

To begin with, securitisation violates US State usury legislation. Secondly, all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ as well as ‘assignment’ securitisations are essentially tax evasion schemes, and the penalties for tax evasion in the United States are excessively severe.

Thirdly, in all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations, the conflict of interest inherent in the sponsor also serving as the servicer constitutes fraud and conversion. In the fourth place, in all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations where the Special Purpose Vehicle [SPV] is a trust, the declaration of trust is void, as it exists for an illegal purpose.

In the fifth place, off-balance sheet treatment of asset-backed securities (both for ‘true-sale’ and for assignment transactions) constitutes fraud.

Sixth, all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations involve blatant fraudulent conveyances. In the seventh place, securitisation usurps United States bankruptcy laws and is accordingly illegal, as well as being also demonstrably contrary to public policy.

SECURITISATION ENTAILS GROSS VIOLATIONS OF R.I.C.O. STATUTES
In ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations, there are fraudulent transactions which serve as ‘predicate acts’ under US Federal R.I.C.O. statutes.

The specific R.I.C.O. sections are: Section 1341 (mail fraud); Section 1343 (wire fraud); Section 1344 (financial institution fraud); Section 1957 (engaging in monetary transactions improperly derived from specified unlawful activity) [‘the money you make from the illegal exploitation of my money, is my money’]; and Section 1952 (racketeering).

Furthermore, securitisation constitutes violations of American antitrust statutes through market integration, syndicate collusion, price formation, vertical foreclosure, tying, price-fixing, predatory pricing, and the rigging of allocations.

Securitisation also involves void contracts, given the lack of consideration, illusory promises, the absence of any actual bargain, the absence of mutuality – and finally illegal subject matter and the contravention of public policy.

Securitisation is riddled with Fraudulent Transfer, Fraud in the Inducement, Fraud in Fact by Deceit, Theft by Deception (Fraudulent Concealment) and Fraudulent Conveyance: see the US securities regulations routinely breached in such activity, listed at the foot of this report and of most of these reports for THE PAST THREE++ YEARS, and other laws also routinely flouted in this context.

NOTWITHSTANDING THAT IT’S ILLEGAL, U.S. AUTHORITIES
CONTINUE TO PROMOTE AND ENCOURAGE SECURITISATION
Yet notwithstanding such crystal-clear indications that securitisation is 100% ILLEGAL under US Law, as well as under Common Law generally (so that these findings are largely applicable in all Common Law countries), US authorities from the highest level downwards, financial institutions, intermediaries, Intelligence Power operatives and others are gearing up for what they doubtless hope will be intensified racketeering and trading activity with (corrupt) foreign counterparties.

This behaviour is being fine-tuned ‘as we speak’, despite the reality that the securitisation activity being planned and implemented violates innumerable US statutes in the manner we summarise above, and notwithstanding that such activity is contrary to public policy. TAnd the International Monetary Fund knows all this perfectly well, yet sits idly by, accommodating this racketeering.

Indeed, it’s as though the Rule of Law did not exist. From the highest level of the US Treasury, the White House, the US State Department and the Central Intelligence Agency and its subsidiaries such as the lethal Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), the mindset, intention and perverse primary objective has all along been to resume Fraudulent Finance based on securitisation, as quickly and as seamlessly as possible. The IMF and World Bank are parties to thus aberrant behaviour.

SUMMARY FORENSIC ANALYSIS PROVING THE ILLEGALITY OF SECURITISATION
From whichever angle securitisation is considered, it is ILLEGAL. For example, the contracts are themselves VOID. This is because the process of securitisation involves several contracts that are either signed simultaneously, or within a short timeframe – many of which are rendered void inter alia because there is no consideration in contracts used in effecting the securitisations.

Many such contracts involve unilateral executory undertakings containing illusory promises. A unilateral executory promise is not a consideration. Such promises typically include a promise made by the Special Purpose Vehicle to pay out periodic interest, whether contingent or non-contingent on whether the collateral pays cash interest.

Collateral-substitution agreements contain a promise whereby the sponsor agrees to substitute impaired collateral. An assignment agreement of future (not yet existing) collateral may well be deemed a unilateral executory promise by the sponsor.

Illusory promises are not valid consideration for a contract. Such promises may be found in the Subscription/Purchase Agreement, whereby an existing asset is being exchanged for a future asset that does not exist as of the date of the subscription/purchase agreement. To make matters worse, none of the agreements typically signed by the investor as part of his/her purchase of the Special Purpose Vehicle’s Asset-Backed Securities expressly incorporates the (typically illusory) promises embodied in the offering prospectus.

OR: The Special Purpose Vehicle’s promise to pay interest and/or dividends on Asset-Backed Securities ‘Interest-Onlys’, Preferreds and ‘Pincipal-Onlys’ are essentially illusory promises because the underlying collateral may not produce any cash flows at all: so there won’t be any interest/dividend payments.

Moreover the lack of mutuality characterising such contracts renders them null and void, by definition. In any such contract, each party must have firm control of the subject matter of the contract and the underlying assets (consideration), and there MUST be a direct contractual relationship between the parties concerned.

But this is not the case, especially as the Special Purpose Vehicle’s corporate documents (trust indentures or bylaws or articles of incorporation) may typically limit the right of each Asset-Backed Security investor; while there is typically no mutuality at all between the Special Purpose Vehicle and the sponsor/originator, because both entities are essentially the same, and are controlled by the sponsor before and after the securitisation takes place.

SECURITISATION: A COVER FOR TAX EVASION
In addition to their multiple violations of American State usury laws, all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment securitisations’ are essentially tax evasion arrangements. In the United States, the applicable tax evasion statute is the US Internal Revenue Code Section 7201 7 which reads: “Any person who willfully attempts in any manner to evade or defeat any tax imposed by this title or the payment thereof shall, in addition to other penalties provided by law, be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $100,000 ($500,000 in the case of a corporation), or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution”.

Under this statute and related case law, prosecutors
must prove three elements beyond any reasonable doubt:

(1): The actus reus (the guilty conduct) – which consists of an affirmative act (not merely an omission or failure to act) that constitutes evasion or an attempt to evade either: (a) the assessment of a tax or (b) the payment of a tax.

(2): The mens rea or “mental” element of willfulness – the specific intent to violate an actually known legal duty. In the case of ‘true sale’ transactions, the tax evasion occurs because:

(a): The sponsor determines the price at which the collateral is transferred to the SPV, and hence, can arbitrarily lower/increase the price to avoid capital gains taxes – it being assumed here that the sponsor is a profit-maximising entity and will always act to minimise its tax liability and to avoid any tax assessment;

(b): The sponsor typically retains a ‘residual’ interest in the SPV in the form of IOs, POs and “junior pieces”, which are typically taxed differently and on a different tax-basis compared with the original collateral: hence, the sponsor can lower the price of the collateral upon transfer to the SPV, and convert what would have been capital gains, into a non-taxable basis in the SPV “residual”;

(c): There is typically the requisite “intent” by the sponsor – evidenced by the arrangement of the transaction and the transfer of assets to the Special Purpose Vehicle;

(d): Before securitisation, collateral is typically reported in the sponsors’ financial statements at book value (that is, lower-of-cost-or-market: under both the US and the international accounting standards, loans and accounts receivable are typically not re-valued to market-value unless there has been some major impairment in value) which does not reflect true Market Values, and results in effective tax evasion on transfer of the collateral to the SPV, as any unrealised gain is not taxed;

(e): The actus reus is manifested by the execution of the securitisation transaction and transfer of assets to the Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV);

(f): The mens rea or specific intent is manifested by the elaborate arrangements implicit in securitisation transactions, the method of determination of the price of the collateral to be transferred to the SPV, the aims of securitisation, and the sponsor’s transfer of assets to the SPV;

(g): The unpaid tax liability consists of foregone tax on the capital gains from the collateral (the transaction is structured to avoid recognition of capital gains), and tax on any income from the collateral which is ‘converted’ into basis or other non-taxable forms;

(h): Income (from the collateral) that would have been taxable in the sponsor’s own financial statements, is converted to a non-taxable basis in the form of the SPV’s Interest-Only (IO) and Principal-Only (PO) securities: part of the Interest-Spread (the difference between the SPV’s income and what it pays as interest and operating costs) is paid out to PO-holders, and this transforms interest into return-of-capital or just capital repayment, with no tax consequences.

In cases of ‘disguised loan’ or ‘assignment’ securitisation transactions, tax evasion occurs:

(a): Because the sponsor determines the price at which the collateral is transferred to the SPV, and hence can lower/increase the price of the collateral to avoid capital gains taxes;

(b): Because the sponsor typically retains a ‘residual’ interest in the SPV which is normally taxed differently and on a different tax-basis compared to the original collateral: hence, the sponsor can lower the price upon transfer to the SPV, and convert what would have been capital gains, to a non-taxable basis for tax purposes;

(c): Because the transfer of collateral to the SPV and the creation of Interest-Only and Principal-Only securities converts what would have been taxable capital gains into non-taxable basis;

(d): Because gain in the value of the collateral is not recognised for tax purposes, because there has not been any ‘sale’;

(e): Where the Asset-Backed Security (ABS) is partly amortising, any capital gains are converted into interest payments;

(f): Because actus reus is manifested by the execution of the securitisation transaction and transfer of assets to the SPV;

(g): Because the mens rea or specific intent is manifested by the elaborate arrangements implicit in securitisation transactions, the objectives of securitisation and the sponsor’s transfer of assets to the Special Purpose Vehicle;

(h): Because the unpaid tax liability consists of tax on the capital gains from the transfer of the collateral (the transaction is structured to avoid recognition of a sale, whereas the transfer to the Special Purpose Vehicle is effectively a sale), and tax on any income from the collateral which is ‘converted’ into basis or other non-taxable forms, by securitisation.

SECURITISATION VIOLATES THE U.S BANKRUPTCY CODE
AND THEREFORE ALSO CONTRAVENES PUBLIC POLICY
Any transfer or conveyance of the assets of a debtor that is deemed to be made for the purposes of hindering, delaying or defrauding actual or potential creditors, may be determined by Courts to be a Fraudulent Conveyance under Section 548 of the US Bankruptcy Code or under a relevant theory of Constructive Fraud.

Although each US State has its own laws regarding the appropriate elements of proof of Constructive Fraud, Section 548(a)(2) of the US Bankruptcy Code permits an inference of Constructive Fraud if the following factors exist:

(1): The debtor received less than reasonably equivalent value for the property transferred; and:

(2): The debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the transfer, or else retained unreasonably small capital after the transfer, or made the transfer with the intent or belief that it would incur debts beyond its ability to pay.

The following theories of Fraudulent Conveyance within the context of securitisation may apply:

• Where the sponsor/originator receives insufficient value for assets transferred.

• Where there is an ‘intent to hinder, delay or defraud’ creditors (representing an implicit pre-petition waiver of one’s right to file for bankruptcy), with regard to the originator’s transfer of assets to the SPV, or the originator’s transfer of assets to the SPV has clearly not been undertaken on an arms’-length basis.

• Where securitisation increases the originator’s bankruptcy risk; and:

• In all instances where securitisation usurps the United States’ bankruptcy laws and is therefore illegal on such a basis alone.

SECURITISATION VIOLATES FEDERAL R.I.C.O. STATUTES
Turning now to the reality that securitisation constitutes a violation of US Federal R.I.C.O. Statutes [see Legal Notes below], we can state without equivocation that the entire securitisation process constitutes violations of Federal R.I.C.O. statutes, because:

(1): There is the requisite criminal or civil ‘enterprise’ – consisting of the sponsor/issuer, the trustees and the intermediary bank. These three parties work closely together to effect the securitisation transaction.

(2): There are ‘predicate acts’ of:

(a): Mail fraud – using the mails for sending out materials among themselves and to investors.

(b): Wire fraud – using wires to engage in fraud by communicating with investors.

(c): Conversion – where there isn’t proper title to collateral.

(d): Deceit: misrepresentation of issues and facts pertaining to the securitisation transaction.

(e): Securities fraud: disclosure issues.

(f): It entails loss of profit opportunity.

(g): It involves the making of false statements and or misleading representations
about the value of the collateral.

(h): It entails stripping the originator/issuer of the ability to pay debt claims or judgment claims in bankruptcy court – a state of affairs that may apply where the sponsor is financially distressed and the cash proceeds of the transaction are significantly less than the value of the collateral.

There is also typically the requisite ‘intent’ by members of the enterprise – evident in knowledge (actual and inferable), acts, omissions, purpose (actual and inferable) and results. Intent can be reasonably inferred from:

(a): The existence of a sponsor that seeks to raise capital – and cannot raise capital on better terms by other means;

(b): The participation of an investment bank that has very strong incentives to consummate the transaction on any agreeable (but not necessarily reasonable) terms.

SECURITISATION ALSO VIOLATES U.S. ANTITRUST LEGISLATION
Securitisation further constitutes violations of US Antitrust laws, because the American Asset-Backed Securities and Mortgage-Backed Securities markets are dominated by relatively few large entities such as FNMA (Fannie Mae), Freddie Mac, the top five investment banks (all of which have conduit programs), and the top five credit card issuers (MBNA, AMEX, Citigroup, etc.), etc.. As a consequence, the top five ABS/MBS issuers control more than 50% of the US ABS/MBS market.

• This constitutes illegal market concentration under US Antitrust legislation.

THE ‘PHILIPPINES EXCEPTION’ BURIED IN THE CLAYTON ACT
In the Antitrust context, however, observe the following text from the Clayton Act, which specifically EXCLUDES transactions undertaken with The Philippines. Isn’t that interesting?

It provides a blanket rationale for the massive past and ongoing US clandestine focus on The Philippines, the CIA’s need for ‘black hole’ conditions there in connection with successive US operations to relieve Presidents Marcos and Aquino of the stolen and hidden ‘Yamashita’s gold’, the US Fraudulent Finance operations using Philippine institutions and related operations based in that territory, an aborted US operation to convert The Philippines into a new US State (as had been planned under Clinton for Somalia), and the frequent visits of operatives known to ourselves to The Philippines under cover of attending to ‘orphanages’:

§ 1 Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 12 Definitions; short title:
(a) “Antitrust laws”, as used herein, includes the Act entitled:
‘An Act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies’, approved July second, eighteen hundred and ninety; sections seventy-three to seventy-seven, inclusive, of an Act entitled ‘An Act to reduce taxation, to provide revenue for the Government, and for other purposes’, of August 27th, eighteen hundred and ninety-four; an Act entitled ‘An Act to amend sections seventy-three and seventy-six of the Act of August twenty-seventh, eighteen hundred and ninetyfour’, entitled ‘An Act to reduce taxation, to provide revenue for the Government, and for other purposes’, approved February twelfth, nineteen hundred and thirteen; and also this Act.

‘Commerce’, as used herein, means trade or commerce among the several States and with foreign nations, or between the District of Columbia or any Territory of the United States and any State, Territory, or foreign nation, or between any insular possessions or other places that are under the jurisdiction of the United States, or between any such possession or place and any US State or Territory of the United States or the District of Columbia or any foreign nation, or within the District of Columbia or any Territory or any insular possession or other place under the jurisdiction of the United States:

Provided, That nothing in this Act contained shall apply to the Philippine Islands. The word ‘person’ or ‘persons’ wherever used in this Act shall be deemed to include corporations and associations existing under or authorized by the laws of either the United States, the laws of any of the Territories, the laws of any State, or the laws of any foreign country.

FANNIE MAE, FREDDIE MAC ENGAGED IN FURTHER ILLEGAL SECURITISATION:
RE-SECURITISING ALREADY SECURITISED ‘DUD’ ASSETS TO DUMP BACK ON THE BANKS
Even so, it became apparent in early March that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, both controlled by the US Government, were planning to force financial enterprises such as the CIA’s Bank of America Corporation, JP Morgan Chase & Co, Wells Fargo and Citigroup, Inc., to buy back further waves of newly securitised packages of mortgages – i.e., the former Government-Sponsored Enterprises are reportedly engaged again in repackaging mortgage securities already marked down to ‘true’ value.

In other words, they are trying to dump faulty securitised loans, as well as straight loans, back on the participating banks – under cover of such fantasies as the double-minded statement attributed to Sharon McHale, spokes‘person’ for Freddie Mac, located adjacent to the CIA in McLean, Virginia, on 5th March 2010: ‘We are trying to be good stewards of taxpayer dollars and as part of that, it’s important that those dollars not go to loans that should not have been sold to us in the first place’ – throwing the blame for Freddie Mac’s own scandalous racketeering behaviour back at the banks.

• Being interpreted, what this woman was saying was: this:

‘We are covering ourselves with a mantle of rectitude by posing as protectors of the taxpayer’s dollars in order to obfuscate our own ongoing racketeering behaviour, even as we prepare further Fraudulent Finance securitisations in violation of the relevant US legislation: and we couldn’t care less because we are owned by the Government itself, which is up to its neck in such violations’.

And Paul Miller, a former examiner for the Federal Reserve (hardly a guarantee of integrity, given the Fed’s own reputation for Fraudulent Finance), based in Arlington, VA, let the cat out of the bag with: ‘If you want to originate mortgages and keep that pipeline running, you have to deal with the push-backs. It doesn’t matter how much you hate Fannie and Freddie’ – and neither, apparently, does it matter to what extent the Rule of Law is cynically violated ‘in order to keep the pipeline (of Fraudulent Finance) running’. It doesn’t matter that securitisation is a form of racketeering.

GARY GENSLER IS NOT AS OPPOSED TO FRAUDULENT FINANCE AS HE SEEMS
The appointment of Gary Gensler as Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission under President Obama was greeted with signs of relief on Wall Street. Here was a hardened former Goldman Sachs trader with 18 years’ experience with that cynical, ruthless money shop, who could be relied upon to act at all times in the interests of Wall Street, not the investor and taxpayer.

But, as has since been reported elsewhere, over a private lunch at the Waldorf Astoria in midtown Manhattan on 6th January 2010, the 52-year-old Gary Gensler caused indigestion among the self-satisfied guests at the luncheon – Timothy O’Hara, head of global credit at Crédit Suisse Holdings USA, Inc.; Robert P. Kelly, CEO at Bank of New York Mellon Corporation; David B. Heller, co-head of the securities division at Goldman Sachs; and Seth Waugh, CEO of Deutsche Bank Americas.

Because when one banker asked Gensler what or whom he saw as the biggest obstacles to reform in the securities and commodities sectors, he replied: ‘You’.

Mr Gensler has been seeking derivatives control legislation that goes beyond current proposals, including what President Obama put forward during the summer of 2009. Notwithstanding the fact that if the derivatives situation is not addressed, the forthcoming crash will be so horrific as to be likely to tip the world into open, rather than covert, warfare, a certain Dr Samuel Hayes, Professor Emeritus of Investment Banking at Harvard Business School, Boston, told Bloomberg in February 2010 that ‘Gensler is going to raise real concerns’ for financial firms.

‘Derivatives are absolutely central to what is Wall Street in the 21st century’ – namely, a casino. ‘Nobody wants the regulations to affect them’.

‘GREATER TRANSPARENCY’ IS EVIDENTLY ALL HE‘S AFTER
On closer examination, Mr Gensler has actually been pushing for ‘more transparency’ in the over-the-counter derivatives market, so as to lower spreads between buyers and sellers and to make it easier for new competitors to enter the market – which the big banks aren’t keen on, as more participants will deprive them of profit.

So, Gary Gensler is not actually in the business of tackling the underlying crisis arising from the determination of financial institutions to continue playing Russian roulette, using the model first developed by the US Intelligence Power as it sought what it thought were foolproof methods of ensuring its financial independence from Congress and the open-ended funding pipelines that it considered appropriate to buttress its usurped status as a recalcitrant ‘State within the State’ impervious to reform and determined to brook no interference with its stolen hegemony.

INVESTORS’ MONEY USED TO REMUNERATE WALL STREET
In any case, the derivatives institutions and their back-up infrastructure have not the slightest intention of adopting any course other than ’business as usual‘ – and on a far larger scale than in the past. This obtuse madness WILL lead to a global collapse, as derivatives products are usually without real value. As a noted article in The New York Times of 7th February 2010 at last stated, investment banks trading derivatives do not own the mortgage bonds, the obligations from home owners, notes signed by home owners or the mortgage deeds of the deeds of trust.

The ‘structured products’, consisting of bundled documents ostensibly relating to the above but having NO RECOURSE to underlying real value, were, however, invested with ‘value’ arising from the name of the institution marketing the ‘asset’ – that is to say, arbitrary ‘value’ arising from the fact that, as a Goldman Sachs compliance officer actually admitted to the Editor of this service: ‘A structured product is worth what someone is prepared to pay for it’ – a penetrating statement which encapsulates the possibility that it may be (is) worthless: which is indeed the case.

‘THE MONEY YOU MAKE BY MISUSING MY MONEY IS MY MONEY’ – I.E., THE HOME OWNER’S
The money sloshing around between investment banks in this dirty market was investors’ money unwittingly advanced into pools of capital which winds up being used primarily to finance the fees, profits, insurance proceeds, insurance premia, and so forth – all for the benefit of Wall Street, paid to the investment banks, and not to investors who stumped up the money in the first place.

These fees and relationships are not and have never been disclosed to the home owner despite, in the United States, clear legislation requiring such transparency, including the Truth in Lending Act, and Deceptive Lending – which require full transparency and disclosure.

• Further legislation applicable to the securities sector in the United States is re-listed below – in the list that we have republished at the foot of our website reports for the past three years.

• The list of applicable securities regulations and laws is augmented by a legal tutorial which, again, we have published for the past three years at the foot of these reports,

It would appear that, notwithstanding such reminders, Wall Street and its compliant infrastructure, as well as its co-conspiring portfolio of dubious foreign trading counterparty institutions, has every intention of continuing to violate the relevant US rules and legislation – while at the same time continuing to abuse, in the mortgage sector, the home owner with the same cynicism as in the past.

Given the legal principle that ‘the money you make from misusing my money is my money’, it is quite clear that undisclosed fees, profits, kickbacks and other financial abuses perpetrated by these big speculative financial entities which produce no real wealth at all, but simply move money around between themselves, are payable to the home owner who signed the ‘loan’ papers in the first place.

THE ILLEGALITY OF SECURITIZATION
A legal analysis by MICHAEL NWOGUGU,
Certified Public Accountant (Maryland, USA); B.Arch.
(City College of New York). MBA (Columbia University).
Attended Suffolk Law School (Boston, USA).

Abstract:
Under US laws, securitization is illegal, primarily because it is fraudulent and causes very specific violations of R.I.C.O., usury, and antitrust laws. Securitization of many types of assets (loans, credit cards, auto receivables, intellectual property, etc.) has become and remains prevalent, particularly for financially distressed companies and companies with low or mid-tier credit ratings. This analysis focuses on securitization as it pertains to asset-backed securities and mortgage-backed securities, and analyzes critical legal and corporate governance issues.

Editor’s Note: This analysis does not elaborate that the illegal securitization model was developed and hijacked by the criminalised Intelligence Power, which is our contribution to the issue; but that is the sum of the matter, to be kept in mind at all times.

Keywords:
Securitization; antitrust; R.I.C.O.; constitutional law; capital markets; complexity; fraud.
[Some American English spelling has been retained].

Main abbreviations:
ABS = Asset-Backed Securities; SPV = Special Purpose Vehicle.

EDITOR’S INTRODUCTION
Under US legislation, securitization is illegal. Indeed many authors have illustrated the deficiencies in securitization (1). This analysis focuses on securitization as it pertains to asset-backed securities and mortgage-backed securities (2), (3).

The existing literature on legal and corporate governance issues pertaining to securitization is extensive, but has several gaps that have not been addressed at all or sufficiently:

• Whether securitization is legal.
• Whether securitization causes usury.
• The standards for usurious loans/forbearance.
• The specific components of cost-of-capital, for purposes of assessing usury violations.
• Antitrust liability in securitization transactions.
• Federal/State R.I.C.O. liability in securitization transactions.
• The constitutionality of securitization transactions.
• The validity of contracts used in effecting securitization transactions.
• Whether securitization usurps the purposes of the US Bankruptcy Code.

This analysis seeks to fill these significant gaps in the literature [and to answer questions vexing the US and international financial markets, for the definitive elimination of doubt – in support of our long-standing demonstration that securitization and the creation and marketing of ‘structured products’ represents serious fraud – Ed.].

Although the following analysis is supported with US case law, the principles derived are applicable to securitization transactions in both common-law countries and civil-law countries – which means that they are applicable in, for instance, the United Kingdom. In analyzing the legality of securitization, the following criteria are relevant:

• Origins and history of securitization – legislative history, evolution of securitization processes, and current practices. Carlson (1998), Janger (2002) and Lupica (2000) (4) trace the known history of US securitization to direct and specific efforts/collaborations to avoid the impact of US bankruptcy laws. Klee & Butler and other authors have traced the history of securitization to attempts to handle the problem of non-performing debt.

• Types of contracts used in securitization:

The primary criteria for enforceability.

• Purposes, wording and scope of applicable laws – state contract laws, State trusts laws, US Bankruptcy Code, and State/Federal securities laws. The legislative intent of the US Congress in drafting and revising the US Bankruptcy Code.

• How the applicable laws are applied in securitization processes – by market participants, regulators and lawyers that represent investors.

•The people, markets, and entities and organizations affected by securitization.

• The usefulness of existing (if any), possible and proposed (if any) deterrence measures designed to reduce fraud/crime/misconduct [such as has been extensively reported by this service, and in International Currency Review – Ed.].

• Transaction costs.

• The results and consequences of the application (or non-application) of relevant laws.

A: SECURITIZATION VIOLATES STATE USURY LAWS
Securitization violates State usury laws, because the resulting effective interest rate typically exceeds legally allowable rates (set by State usury laws) (5). There is substantial disagreement (conflicts in case-law holdings) among various US court jurisdictions, and also within some judicial jurisdictions, about some issues; and these conflicts have not been resolved by the US Supreme Court 6. On these issues, even the cases for which the US Supreme Court denied certiorari, vary substantially in their holdings. The pertinent issues are as follows:

1: What constitutes usury.
2: What costs should be included when calculating the effective cost-of-funds.
3. What types of forbearance qualify for applicability of usury laws.
4: Conditions for pre-emption of state usury laws. Where the securitization is deemed an assignment of collateral, the effective cost-of-funds for the securitization transaction is not the advertised interest cost (investor’s coupon rate) of the ABS securities, but rather the sum of the following elements:

• The greater of the sponsor’s/originator’s annual cost-of-equity (in percentages) or the percentage annual cash yield from the collateral (in a situation where the SPV’s corporate documents expressly state that the Excess Spread should be paid to the sponsor, the Excess Spread should be subtracted from the resulting percentage). The Excess Spread is defined as the Gross Cash Yield From The Collateral, minus the interest paid to investors, minus the Servicing Expense (paid to the servicer), minus Charge-offs (impaired collateral).

• The Amortized Value Difference:
The difference prevailing between the Market Value of the collateral, and the amount raised from the ABS offering (before bankers’ fees), which is then amortized over the average life of the ABS bonds (at a discount rate equal to the US Treasury Bond rate of same maturity) and then expressed as percentage of the market value of the collateral. This difference can range from 10-30% of the Market Value of the collateral, and is highest where there is a senior/junior structure, and the junior/first-loss piece serves only as credit enhancement.

• Amortized Total Periodic Transaction Cost:
The Pre-offering Transaction Costs are amortized over the average life of the ABS, a rate equal to the interest rate on an equivalent-term US Treasury bond. The Periodic Transaction Costs are then added to the Amortized Pre-offering Transaction Costs to obtain Total Periodic Transaction Cost which is expressed as a percentage of the value of the pledged collateral.

The Pre-offering Transaction Costs include external costs (underwriters’ commissions/fees, filing fees, administrative costs (escrow, transfer agent, etc.), marketing costs, accountant’s fees, legal fees, etc.) and internal costs incurred solely because of the securitization transaction (namely, costs incurred internally by the sponsor/originator, viz. direct administrative costs, printing, etc.). Periodic Transaction Costs = admin. costs, servicing fees, charge-off expenses, escrow costs.

• Foregone Capital Appreciation:
The foregone average annual appreciation/depreciation of the value of the collateral minus the interest rate on demand deposits, with the difference expressed as a percentage of the Market Value of the collateral.

The sum of these four elements is typically greater than state-law usury benchmark rates.

Where the securitization is deemed a ‘true-sale’, there is an implicit financing cost which is typically usurious, because it is equal to the sum of the following:

• Base Cost of Capital:
The greater of the sponsor’s or originator’s annual weighted-average-cost-of-capital, or the annual percentage yield from the collateral.

• The Amortized Total Periodic Transaction Cost:
The Pre-Securitization Transaction Costs paid by the sponsor or originator and directly attributable to the offering is amortized over the life of the ABS, at a rate equivalent to the interest rate on an equivalent-term US Treasury bond, and the result (the Amortized Pre-Securitization Costs) is then added to the Periodic Transaction Costs for only one period in order to obtain the Total Periodic Transaction Cost, which is then expressed as a percentage of the market value of the collateral. This is the Amortized Total Periodic Transaction Cost.

The Pre-Securitization Transaction Costs include external costs (underwriters’ commissions/fees, filing fees, administrative costs (escrow, transfer agent, etc.), marketing costs, accountant’s fees, legal fees, etc.) and internal costs incurred solely because of the securitization transaction (viz. costs incurred internally by the sponsor/originator, namely direct administrative costs, printing). Periodic Transaction Costs = admin. costs, servicing fees, charge-off expenses, escrow costs.

• The Value Difference:
This is the difference between the Market Value of the collateral, and the amount raised from the ABS offering (before bankers’ fees), is amortized over the average life of the ABS bonds and the result is then expressed as percentage of the Market Value of the collateral.

• This difference can range from 10 to 30%, and is highest where the senior/junior structure is used and the junior piece serves only as credit enhancement.

• Amortized Unrealized Losses:
Any unrealized loss in the carrying amount of the collateral, is amortized over the estimated average life of the ABS, and the result for one period is expressed as a percentage of the book value of the collateral. Most Asset-Backed Securities collateral data are recorded in financial statements at the lower-of-cost-or-market.

• Foregone Capital Appreciation:
foregone average annual appreciation/depreciation of the value of the collateral minus the interest rate on demand deposits, with the difference expressed as a percentage of the Market Value of the collateral. The sum of these elements is typically greater than state-law usury benchmark rates.

B: ALL ‘TRUE-SALE’, DISGUISED LOAN’ AND ‘ASSIGNMENT
SECURITIZATIONS ARE ESSENTIALLY TAX-EVASION SCHEMES
In the United States, the applicable tax evasion statute is the US Internal Revenue Code Section 7201 7 which reads as follows: “…….Any person who willfully attempts in any manner to evade or defeat any tax imposed by this title or the payment thereof shall, in addition to other penalties provided by law, be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $100,000 ($500,000 in the case of a corporation), or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution………”.

Under this statute and related case law, prosecutors
must prove three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

(1): The actus reus (the guilty conduct) – which consists of an affirmative act (and not merely an omission or failure to act) that constitutes evasion or an attempt to evade either: (a) the assessment of a tax or (b) the payment of a tax.

(2): The mens rea or “mental” element of willfulness –
the specific intent to violate an actually known legal duty.

In the case of ‘true sale’ transactions, the tax evasion (8) occurs because:

(a): The sponsor determines the price at which the collateral is transferred to the Special Purpose Vehicle and hence, can arbitrarily lower/increase the price to avoid capital gains taxes – it being assumed here that the sponsor is a profit-maximizing entity and will always act to minimize its tax liability and to avoid any tax assessment;

(b): The sponsor typically retains a ‘residual’ interest in the SPV in the form of IOs, POs and “junior pieces”, which are typically taxed differently and on a different tax-basis compared with the original collateral: hence, the sponsor can lower the price of the collateral upon transfer to the SPV, and convert what would have been capital gains, into a non-taxable basis in the SPV “residual”;

(c): There is typically the requisite “intent” by the sponsor – evidenced by the arrangement of the transaction and the transfer of assets to the Special Purpose Vehicle;

(d): Before securitization, collateral is typically reported in the sponsors’ financial statements at book value (lower-of-cost-or-market: under both American and international accounting standards, loans and accounts receivable are typically not re-valued to market-value unless there has been some major impairment in value) which does not reflect true Market Values, and results in effective tax evasion upon transfer of the collateral to the SPV because any unrealized gain is not taxed;

(e): The actus reus is manifested by the execution of the securitization transaction and transfer of assets to the Special Purpose Vehicle;

(f): The mens rea or specific intent is manifested by the elaborate arrangements implicit in securitization transactions, the method of determination of the price of the collateral to be transferred to the Special Purpose Vehicle, the objectives of securitization, and the sponsor’s transfer of assets to the Special Purpose Vehicle;

(g): The unpaid tax liability consists of foregone tax on the capital gains from the collateral (the transaction is structured to avoid recognition of capital gains), and tax on any income from the collateral which is ‘converted’ into basis or other non-taxable forms;

(h): Income (from the collateral) that would have been taxable in the sponsor’s financial statements, is converted into non-taxable basis in the form of the SPV’s Interest-Only (IO) and Principal-Only (PO) securities: part of the Interest-Spread (the difference between the SPV’s income and what it pays as interest and operating costs) is paid out to PO-holders, and this transforms interest into return-of-capital or just capital repayment, with no tax consequences.

In the case of ‘disguised loan’ or ‘assignment’ securitization transactions,
the tax evasion occurs because:

(a): The sponsor determines the price at which the collateral is transferred to the SPV, and hence can lower/increase the price of the collateral to avoid capital gains taxes;

(b): The sponsor typically retains a ‘residual’ interest in the SPV which is typically taxed differently and on a different tax-basis compared to the original collateral: hence, the sponsor can lower the price upon transfer to the SPV, and convert what would have been capital gains, into non-taxable basis for tax purposes;

(c): The transfer of collateral to the SPV and the creation of interest-only and principal-only securities essentially converts what would have been taxable capital gains into non-taxable basis;

(d): Any gain in the value of the collateral is not recognized for tax purposes, because there has not been any ‘sale’;

(e): Where the ABS is partly amortizing, any capital gains are converted into interest payments;
(f): The actus reus is manifested by the execution of the securitization transaction and transfer of assets to the Special Purpose Vehicle;

(g): The mens rea or specific intent is manifested by the elaborate arrangements implicit in securitization transactions, the objectives of securitization and the sponsor’s transfer of assets to the Special Purpose Vehicle;

(h): The unpaid tax liability consists of tax on the capital gains from the transfer of the collateral (the transaction is structured to avoid recognition of a sale, whereas the transfer to the Special Purpose Vehicle is effectively a sale), and tax liability on any income from the collateral which is ‘converted’ into basis or other non-taxable forms (Interest-Onlys and Principal-Onlys), by securitization.

C – 1: IN ALL ‘TRUE-SALE’, ‘DISGUISED LOAN’ AND ‘ASSIGNMENT’ SECURITIZATIONS, THE
CONFLICT OF INTEREST INHERENT IN THE SPONSOR ALSO SERVING AS THE SERVICER,
CONSTITUTES FRAUD AND CONVERSION: SEE OUR STANDARD LEGAL NOTES BELOW.
In most securitization transactions, the sponsor eventually serves as the servicer of the Special Purpose Vehicle asset pool.

As servicer, the sponsor: (a) determines when there has been impairment of collateral; (b) selects collateral for replacement; and (c) monitors collateral performance.

To prove fraud, prosecutors must prove several elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

(1): The actus reus (the guilty conduct) – which consists of an affirmative act (and not merely an omission or failure to act) of misrepresentation of material facts. In securitizations, the sponsor typically makes material misrepresentations:

(a) The sponsor/servicer selects the assets to be transferred to the SPV, and the terms of the offering Prospectus typically misrepresent the level of objectivity and fairness of the servicer/sponsor;

(b) The sponsor/servicer selects collateral for substitution where there are problems – the past and present disclosure statements and ABS offering documents materially misrepresent the sponsor/servicer’s objectivity/fairness.

(2): The mens rea or ‘mental’ element of willfulness – the specific intent to misrepresent the sponsor/servicer’s acts, truthfulness and objectivity/fairness, is manifested by the dual rôle of sponsor/servicer which constitutes a conflict-of-interest. Mens rea is also clearly inferable from the facts and circumstances: the sponsor/servicer clearly has significant economic, psychological and ‘legal’ incentives to maximize its profits by:

(a): Delaying substitution of collateral for as long as possible;

(b): Delaying recognition of collateral impairment, and:

(c): Substituting impaired collateral with sub-standard collateral; all of which make the sponsor highly unsuitable for the rôle of servicer;

(3): The reliance element: ABS investors rely heavily on the structure/arrangements, contracts and disclosure statements in securitizations, which are always relatively complex. These form the primary source of knowledge and valuation terms for the investor;

(4): The victim(s) suffer(s) loss as a result of the misrepresentations (whether of direct or proximate causation). Investors suffer losses because of the sponsor’s/servicer’s misrepresentations of its obligations, fairness, objectivity and fiduciary duties:

Specifically:

(a) Investors’ estimates of the values of Asset-Backed Securities are inaccurate and too high due to the servicer’s/sponsor’s misrepresentations;

(b) Investors incur unnecessary trading costs to re-balance their portfolios as the Asset-Backed Security becomes riskier;

(c) Investors and the sponsor/servicer incur additional monitoring costs whenever there is any report of impairment of collateral or substitution. Furthermore, in the ABS sales process, the underwriter makes certain representations concerning the effectiveness and predictability of the collection process. Under certain conditions, investors relying on such representations may have a securities fraud claim if the servicer fails to perform, such as in bankruptcy.

C-2: IN ALL ‘TRUE-SALE’, ‘DISGUISED LOAN’ AND ‘ASSIGNMENT’ SECURITIZATIONS WHERE
THE SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLE IS A TRUST, THE DECLARATION OF TRUST IS VOID AS IT EXISTS FOR AN ILLEGAL PURPOSE. [ALL CONTRACTS STRUCK FOR AN ILLEGAL PURPOSE ARE NULL AND VOID, SOMETHING THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISES DON’T WANT YOU TO KNOW].
The declaration of trust relating to the SPV is void because the intent and purpose of the SPV is illegal and unconstitutional as described in this analysis and in Nwogugu (2006).

D: OFF-BALANCE SHEET TREATMENT OF ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES (BOTH
FOR ‘TRUE-SALE’ AND FOR ‘ASSIGNMENT’ TRANSACTIONS) CONSTITUTES FRAUD
Under prevailing accounting rules in the United States and most countries, if certain criteria were met, the debt raised by the Special Purpose Vehicle in securitization can be treated as off-balance sheet debt. However this requires compliance with three criteria:

(i) The Special Purpose Vehicle should be truly independent from the sponsor and the directors, fiduciary administrative duties notwithstanding.

(ii) The sponsor’s transfer of the assets to the SPV should be a ‘true sale’ and the sponsor should not have any ongoing economic interest in the assets.

(iii) The form and substance should transparently be identical, and the structure should not appear to be illusory or deceptive.

Nevertheless, these off-balance-sheet treatment criteria have been recently reformed by changes in accounting standards. The British-based International Accounting Standards Board and the US FASB are moving towards stricter reporting standards. Specifically:

• FIN 46 (FASB): Effective in 2003, FIN 46 applies only to companies subject to regulation by the FASB. Its objective is to substantially tighten the criteria necessary to obtain off-balance-sheet treatment for Special Purpose Vehicles, and its main thrust is capital adequacy.

• FIN 46 also imposes an obligation on originators to consolidate the accounts of an SPV (denying off-balance-sheet treatment) unless the total equity at risk is regarded as sufficient to enable the SPV to finance its own activities.

• IAS 32, IAS 39, and IFRS 7: International Accounting Standards (IAS) 32 covers the disclosure and presentation of financial instruments, but from 2007 onwards the disclosure aspects were replaced by the introduction of International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) (7). IAS 39 deals with the recognition and measurement of financial instruments, and has been challenged in two aspects:

(1): Introducing the concept of “fair value” accounting for financial instruments and (2): whether SPVs should be consolidated back into the balance sheet of the originator. Like Fin 46, IAS 32 may result in consolidation of most SPVs on-balance-sheet of the sponsors.

• Basel II: The Basel II disciplines are aimed at the global banking industry and call for a more scientific measurement of risk and of capital requirements for banks in order to support that risk. Since the general expectation has been that, in overall terms, the proposals could require the banking industry to maintain a higher rather than lower capital base, the proposals have met resistance from many banks. The Basel Committee’s rules/codes are not binding because the Committee is not a regulator: a situation exploited by the racketeering institutions.

But off-balance sheet treatment of ABS (Asset-Backed Securities) debt in securitizations, constitutes fraud because:

(1): The mens rea or ‘mental’ element of willfulness – the specific intent to misrepresent the true ‘Trust’ nature of the Special Purpose Vehicle debt – is manifested by the elaborate arrangements and structure of the securitization transaction.

(2): The actus reus (the guilty conduct): This consists of the affirmative act of misrepresentation of materials facts by not consolidating the Special Purpose Vehicle on the sponsor’s Balance Sheet.

In securitization, consolidation of the Special Purpose Vehicle onto the sponsor’s financial statements is warranted because the sponsor:

(a) Typically retains a residual economic interest in the Special Purpose Vehicle;

(b) Functions as servicer of the Special Purpose Vehicle asset pool – which grants the sponsor significant control over the assets and the SPV’s operations;

(c) Determines recognition of impairment of collateral, and selects and provides assets for ‘substitution’ of collateral; and:

(d) Typically misrepresents the level of objectivity and fairness of the servicer/sponsor in disclosure statements.

Taken together, these factors and all the aforementioned new accounting standards constitute sufficient actus reus.

(3): The reliance element:
The sponsor’s current and his prospective shareholders and other investors rely heavily on the structure/arrangements of securitizations, associated disclosure statements and assurances of off-balance sheet treatment of SPV debt in securitizations, which are relatively complex. These form the primary source of knowledge and valuation terms for the investor.

(4): The victim suffers loss as a result of the misrepresentation (direct or proximate causation): Investors suffer loss because of the sponsor/servicer’s misrepresentations of its obligations:

(a) Investors’ estimates of the values of the sponsor’s equity are inaccurate and excessively high due to the servicer’s/sponsor’s misrepresentations of the SPV debt;

(b) Investors incur unnecessary trading costs to re-balance their portfolios as the sponsor is deemed more risky;

(c) The investor and the sponsor/servicer incurs additional monitoring costs whenever there is any report of impairment of collateral or substitution.

E: ALL ‘TRUE-SALE’, ‘DISGUISED LOAN’ AND ‘ASSIGNMENT’
SECURITIZATIONS INVOLVE FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES

Any transfer or conveyance of the assets of a debtor that is deemed to be made for the purposes of hindering, delaying or defrauding actual or potential creditors, may be determined to be a Fraudulent Conveyance (9).

In the United States, three sets of laws cover potential Fraudulent Conveyances:

(a) Section 548 of the US Bankruptcy Code (the Code); or

(b) Most States have adopted the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA) (10) or else the older Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act (UFCA); or

(c) Fraudulent Transfers claims can also be made under a theory of constructive fraud, in which circumstantial evidence may warrant a finding that Fraudulent Transfers were made with the primary purpose of shielding assets from current or future creditors. Although each US State has its own laws regarding the appropriate elements of proof of constructive fraud, Section 548(a)(2)
of the US Bankruptcy Code permits an inference of constructive fraud if the following factors exist:

(1): The debtor received less than reasonably equivalent value for the property transferred; and:

(2): The debtor either: was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the transfer, retained unreasonably small capital after the transfer, or made the transfer with the intent or belief that it would incur debts beyond its ability to pay.

The following are the various theories of Fraudulent Conveyance
within the context of securitization.

E-1: Sponsor/Originator receives insufficient value for assets transferred:

All ‘true sale‘ as well as ‘assignment’ securitizations involve Fraudulent Conveyances (as defined within the US Bankruptcy Code and the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act) because the originator receives insufficient value for assets that it transfers to the Special Purpose Vehicle (11), (12):

(i): Horizon mismatch:
In the case of receivables and fixed income assets, since the originator/sponsor sells these assets before their maturities, their effective yields and values are much lower than their stated yields, and hence, the originator receives less-than-normal value for assets transferred.

(ii): The originator always incurs substantial cash and non-cash transaction costs in such transfers, which reduces the net-value it receives from the transfer to the Special Purpose Vehicle. These costs include all legal fees, accounting fees, underwriting fees, monitoring costs, administrative costs, regulatory compliance costs, capital-budgeting costs (because the decision to securitize has inherent negotiation costs), conflict costs and resource allocation costs, etc.;

(iii): In these asset transfers, the originator loses all the future appreciation of the transferred assets: the transfers are done at book values or stated adjusted costs. The asset valuations for the transfers don’t consider future increases in asset value, and hence are an implicit undervaluation.

(iv): Where the assets transferred have residual values (as in computer leases and equipment leases), the originator often cannot accurately calculate such residual values and does not incorporate them in asset valuation, and loses such residual value; and hence, receives less than normal value for the assets transferred;

(v): In some securitizations, the originator’s transfer of assets to the SPV is backed by recourse (to the originator’s assets) and such recourse has economic value that reduces the net-value that the originator receives from the transfer. [Higgin & Mason (2004), Pantaleo et al. (1996) and Plank (1991) (13) describe the basis for the value of such recourse].

(vi): Where the originator and sponsor is financially distressed, securitization is often the chosen form of financing, and under Fraudulent Conveyance laws, securitizations are illegal because:

(1): Securitizations increase the bankruptcy risk of the originator/sponsor;

(2): The distressed company’s assets are typically valued at higher interest rates (which yield lower asset values) and hence, the originator loses value in the transfers.

(vii): The originator’s/sponsor’s net-cash proceeds from the securitization transaction is often significantly less than either the pre-transaction carrying value of the collateral, or the net realizable value of the collateral (liquidation value in a supervised open auction) – primarily because of transaction costs, over-collateralization, etc..

E-2: ‘Intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors’:
Implicit pre-petition waiver of right to file for bankruptcy:

All ‘true sale‘ as well as ‘assignment’ securitizations involve Fraudulent Conveyances (as defined in the US Bankruptcy Code and the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act) because as described in this analysis, such securitizations are the equivalent of illegal pre-petition waivers of the right to file bankruptcy, and the waiver of the bankruptcy stay – all of which are sufficient evidence of ‘intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any creditor of the debtor’, which is the major element of Fraudulent Conveyance under the UFTA and the US Bankruptcy Code.

E-3: ‘Intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors’:
originator’s transfer of assets to the Special Purpose Vehicle:

All ‘true sale‘ and ‘assignment’ securitizations involve Fraudulent Conveyances (as defined in the US Bankruptcy Code and the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act) because the originator‘s/sponsor‘s mere act of transferring assets to an SPecial Purpsoe Vehicle reduces the values of any of its unsecured creditors’ claims – i.e. trade creditors, holders of any unsecured loans, holders of certain preferred stock, etc.. (14).

Without such transfers, the unsecured creditors would have had access to such assets. This is sufficient evidence of ‘intent to hinder, delay or defraud’ existing creditors.

[It follows that the Rule of Law has been comprehensively flouted,
with the rot starting and condoned at the highest levels – Ed.].

E-4: ‘Intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors’:
Originator’s transfer of assets to the SPV has not been undertaken on an arms’-length basis:

The originator’s transfer of assets to the SPV via a ‘true sale’ or ‘assignment’ is typically not done by means of arms’-length transactions. Most originators have substantial influence/control over the valuation of collateral, the selection of the appraiser and valuers, the choice of appraised collateral, the corporate form and life of the SPV, and the selection of the officers/trustees of the SPV. Hence, the originator can manipulate the values of collateral for accounting and economic purposes. The originator typically creates, funds and staffs the SPV – hires the SPV’s officers and directors and determines the SPV’s corporate governance policies. The combination of such excessive control, and the originator’s transfer of assets to the SPV is prima facie evidence of ‘intent to hinder, delay or defraud’ the originator’s existing and future creditors.

E-5: Securitization increases the originator’s bankruptcy risk:
Securitization can increase the bankruptcy risk of an originator (15), where:

(a) The cash proceeds from the securitization transaction are significantly less than either the carrying value of the collateral, or the net realizable value of the collateral (liquidation value in a supervised auction); or:

(b) Management reinvests the cash proceeds of securitization in projects that yield returns that are less than what the collateral would have yielded, or less than the company’s cost of debt.
Securitization via ‘assignments’ or else ‘disguised loans’ increases the risk to be borne by the originator/sponsor, and also increases its post-transaction cost of capital primarily because:

(a) The amount raised is less than the assets pledged;

(b) The pledge of assets to the SPV reduces the originator’s borrowing
capacity and financial flexibility;

(c) The pledge of assets to the Special Purpose Vehicle reduces the originator’s ability to repay other debt. Hence, the originator/sponsor loses value in the transfer of assets to the SPV.

F: SECURITIZATION USURPS UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY LAWS AND HENCE IS ILLEGAL
Securitization undermines US Federal bankruptcy policy, because it is used (in lieu of secured financing) as a means of avoiding certain bankruptcy-law restrictions (16). Indeed, the origins of securitization in the United States can be traced directly to attempts by banks and financial institutions to avoid bankruptcy law restrictions.

An analysis of the legislative intent of the US Congress with regard to the US Bankruptcy Code confirms that securitization contravenes most policies of the US Bankruptcy Code (17).

• IT ALSO CONTRAVENES PUBLIC POLICY, WHICH EMBRACES:

(a): Recognition of financial distress;
(b): Stay of bankruptcy proceedings;
(c): Determination of claims and priorities of security interests;
(d): Fair division of value;
(e): The continuance or liquidation decision;
(f): Efficient reorganization.

In most cases, insolvency often occurs before management decides to file for bankruptcy. Many firms that are either financially distressed and or technically insolvent continue to operate as if they are normal companies, and enter into securitization transactions. often, securitization enables them to reduce the effect of actual and or perceived low credit ratings. Securitization is often a major strategic choice for financially distressed corporations (18). Under the US Internal Revenue Tax Code, securitization qualifies as a reorganization. The underlying issues are as follows.

F-1: Implicit waiver of right to file for bankruptcy and/or Stay of Bankruptcy:

Securitization involves an implicit (and often an express) waiver of the debtor’s, originator’s, sponsor’s right to file for voluntary bankruptcy. This is achieved by using a bankruptcy-remote Special Purpose Vehicle and segregating the assets that otherwise would have been part of the bankruptcy estate (19), (20). Securitization involves an implicit (and very often an express) waiver of the creditor/Asset-Backed Securities-investor’s right to file for involuntary bankruptcy (21), (22).

US Courts have repeatedly held that such waivers are void as against public policy. In the absence of securitization, these same investors/creditors would have been creditors/ a.k.a. lenders to the sponsor/originator. This implicit waiver is achieved by employing a Special Purpose Vehicle and segregating the assets that otherwise would have been part of the bankruptcy estate; and by various forms of credit enhancement.

Without the automatic stay of the Bankruptcy Code, the debtor/sponsor would not need to transfer assets to an SPV. Carlson (1998) traces the history of securitization to direct and specific efforts/collaborations to avoid the impact of US bankruptcy laws (23).

Furthermore, there is a distinct difference of opinion among US courts about the enforceability of pre-petition waivers (of rights to file for voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy) which has not been resolved by the US Supreme Court (24). However, the standard securitization processes diverge substantially from the conditions in cases where the courts held that pre-petition waivers (or rights to file for bankruptcy) were unenforceable.

F-2: The U.S. Bankruptcy Code expressly invalidates certain pre-filing transfers:

Sections of the US Bankruptcy Code expressly invalidate certain types of pre-filing transfers, payments and transactions (that occur within a specific time period before the filing of bankruptcy). Most securitizations fall under the classes of voidable pre-filing transfers.

• Hence, under these foregoing circumstances/conditions, bankruptcy laws and associated principles are implicated and apply where the firm has not filed for bankruptcy.

Therefore, any pre-bankruptcy filing transactions that invalidate or contravene the principles of Bankruptcy Codes are illegal. The bankruptcy-remoteness characteristic of securitizations prevents the efficient functioning of US bankruptcy law, and jeopardises the law.

G: NEW THEORIES ON THE EFFECTS OF SECURITIZATION ON BANKRUPTCY EFFICIENCY
The following are new theories that explain how securitization
contravenes the basic principles of US bankruptcy laws:

G-1: The illegal wealth-transfer theory:

Securitization can result in Fraudulent Conveyance and in illegal transfer of wealth where the transaction effectively renders the originator/issuer company technically insolvent; or fraudulently transfers value to the SPV (in the form of low collateral values) and then to the ABS/MBS [Mortgage-Backed Securities] bond holders (in the form of low bond prices, and or high interest rates) (25). Courts have held that stripping a company of the ability to pay judgment claims is a ‘predicate act’ that is actionable under Federal R.I.C.O. statutes (26). Securitization can also result in illegal wealth transfers to the intermediary bank where it retains a residual interest in the Trust/SPV (residual securities) or is over-compensated (excessive cash fees, trustee positions, underwriter is granted a percentage of securities offered, etc.).

G-2: The Priority-changing theory:

To the extent that bankruptcy laws are designed to facilitate rehabilitation of troubled companies, and increase efficient allocation of debtor assets to creditors, securitization enables the debtor to defeat the Absolute-Priority principle; and effectively to re-arrange priorities of claims, particularly where the debtor/originator does not have any secured claims (but has only unsecured claims). This is achieved by securitizing unencumbered assets and applying credit enhancement to provide higher-quality securities (which is the equivalent of higher priority) to other creditors.

G-3: The Facilitation of inefficient-continuance theory:

Securitization enables the debtor/originator to change the progression of financial distress, by supplying cash that typically lasts for short periods of time, and often at a high effective cost of funds. This implicates the principles of ‘inefficient continuance’ (where an otherwise non-viable company that should be liquidated, sold/merged or substantially reorganized, continues to operate solely as a result of short-term solutions and or bankruptcy court orders), and hence, the sections of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (‘SOX’) – which require certification of solvency of the company and adequacy of internal controls, and also carry criminal penalties for non-compliance (27).

The question of whether ‘inefficient continuance’ has occurred is a matter of law that should be decided by judges. Thus, all else remaining constant, where the necessary elements occur, (a securitization and ‘inefficient continuance’ and management’s certification of solvency and adequate internal controls), management and the company become criminally liable.

G-4: The information-content effect theory:

Securitization changes and distorts the perceived financial position of the originator/sponsor, because various forms of credit enhancement (senior/junior pieces, loan insurance, etc.) are used to achieve a high credit rating for the Special Purpose Vehicle – which may be misconstrued by stock-market investors as evidence of good prospects for the originator-company. To the extent that all securities offerings have relevant information content and associated signalling, then securitization by financially distressed companies effectively conveys the wrong signals to capital markets and hence, changes the expectations of creditors and shareholders (and in the case of bankruptcy, makes it more difficult to form consensus efficiently on a plan of reorganization once the bankruptcy petition is filed). In this realm, investor and creditor expectations are critical and have utility value and typically form the basis for investment/disinvestment and for negotiations about restructuring or any plan of reorganization.

US Courts have held that persons that create false impressions about the financial condition of a company are potentially liable under Federal R.I.C.O. statutes (28).

G-5: The information-content effect theory:

To the extent that securitzation defers or eliminates a potential creditor’s rights to file for involuntary bankruptcy, then securitization can be deemed to be fraudulent, and gives rise to criminal causes of action such as deceit, conversion, etc. The creditor’s right to file for a debtor’s involuntary bankruptcy is a valid property right that arises from State property law, State contract law, State constitutional laws, and Federal bankruptcy laws (29). Deprivation of, or interference with, this property right is a violation of the US Constitution. Securitization can defer or eliminate this property right, and hence violate the US Constitution where the transaction:

(a): Effectively rearranges priority of claims; or:

(b): Reduces the debtor-company’s borrowing capacity (value of unencumbered/unpledged collateral) to the detriment of secured and or unsecured creditors; or:

(c): Uses the proceeds of the transaction to pay-off some (but not all) members of a potential class of creditors that can file an involuntary bankruptcy petition.

H: SECURITIZATION CONSTITUTES A VIOLATION OF FEDERAL R.I.C.O. STATUTES
In ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ or ‘assignment’ securitizations, there are fraudulent transactions which serve as ‘predicate acts’ under Federal R.I.C.O. statutes (30).

The specific R.I.C.O. sections implicated are:
• Section 1341 (mail fraud)
• Section 1343 (wire fraud)
• Section 1344 (financial institution fraud)
• Section 1957 (engaging in monetary transactions in property
derived from specified unlawful activity).
• Section 1952 (racketeering).

The prices of the collateral are determined in negotiations between the sponsor/issuer and the intermediary bank and on occasion, the SPV’s trustees. This presents opportunities for ‘predicate acts’ (ie. fraud, conversion, etc.) because:

(1): The collateral could be under-valued or over-valued. There are no State or Federal laws that require independent valuation of collateral or appointment of independent/certified trustees in securitization transactions. The parties involved are often business acquaintances.

The originatorsponsor controls the entire process.

(2): The trustees can be, and are influenced by the sponsor/originator and or intermediary investment-bank.

(3): The required disclosure of collateral is sometimes insufficient. Specifically:

(a): It does not include historical performance of collateral pools;
(b): It does not include criteria for selection of collateral and for substitution of collateral;
(c) Criteria for replacement of impaired collateral are sometimes not reasonable;

(4): Mail and wire are used extensively in communications with investors and participants
in the transaction; and:

(5): There is compulsion – because the intermediary or investment bank has very substantial incentives to under-price the securities, and to inflate/deflate the value of the collateral in order to consummate the transaction and earn fees.

The entire securitization process constitutes violations of Federal R.I.C.O. (31) statutes because:

(1): There is the requisite criminal or civil ‘enterprise’ – consisting of the sponsor/issuer, the trustees and the intermediary bank. These three parties work closely together to effect the securitization transaction.

(2): There are ‘predicate acts’ (32) of:

(a): Mail fraud – using the mails for sending out materials among themselves and to investors.
(b): Wire fraud – using wires to engage in fraud by communicating with investors.
(c): Conversion – where there isn’t proper title to collateral.
(d): Deceit: Misrepresentation of issues and facts pertaining to the securitization transaction.
(e): Securities fraud: disclosure issues.
(f): Loss of profit opportunity.
(g): Making false statements and or misleading representations about the value of the collateral.
(h): Stripping the originator/issuer of the ability to pay debt claims or judgment claims in bankruptcy court – a state of affairs that may apply where the sponsor is financially distressed and the cash proceeds of the transaction are significantly less than the value of the collateral.

(3): There is typically the requisite ‘intent’ by members of the enterprise – evident in knowledge (actual and inferable), acts, omissions, purpose (actual and inferable) and results. Intent can be reasonably inferred from:

(a): The existence of a sponsor that seeks to raise capital – and cannot raise capital on better terms by other means;
(b) The participation of an investment bank that has very strong incentives to consummate the transaction on any agreeable (but not necessarily reasonable) terms.

I: SECURITIZATION CONSTITUTES VIOLATIONS OF U.S. ANTITRUST LAWS
The various processes in securitization constitute egregious violations
of the US Antitrust statutes (33), (34), (35). Specifically:

I-1: Market concentration:

The American Asset-Backed Securities and Mortgage-Backed Securities markets are dominated by relatively few large entities such as FNMA, Freddie Mac, the top five investment banks (all of which have conduit programs), and the top five credit card issuers (MBNA, AMEX, Citigroup, etc.), etc.. As a consequence, the top five ABS/MBS issuers control more than 50% of the US ABS/MBS market.
This constitutes illegal market concentration under US Antitrust legislation

I-2: Market integration:

The American Asset-Backed Securities and Mortgage-Backed Securities markets are essentially both national and international (that is to say, geographically-diverse entitiesand individuals participate in each transaction). Each Asset-Backed Securities (ABS) transaction/offering typically involves a ‘roadshow’ which consists of presentations to investors in various cities.

The cost of the roadshow is often paid by the underwriter(s) before its fees are paid by the sponsor. In addition, there are printing, mailing, traveling and administrative costs that increase with the greater geographical dispersion of investors. This has two main effects:

(a): It reduces competitive pressure on dominant investment banks and groups of investment banks (to the detriment of smaller investment banks); and:
(b): It raises market-entry barriers by making it more expensive to conduct ‘roadshows’ for new offerings. Hence, the market integration created by the industry practices of securities underwriters is anti-competitive and violates the Sherman Act, and the FTC Antitrust statutes.

I-3: Syndicate collusion:

The syndicates (of investment banks) used in distributing Asset-Backed Securities and Mortgage-Backed Securities (ABS/MBS) essentially collude to determine:
(a): The price at which each ABS tranche is sold;
(b): Which investors can purchase different tranches.

Collusion occurs because:

(a): In the typical Asset-Backed Securities (ABS) offering, the price determination process is not transparent or democratic because the lead underwriters typically negotiate the offering price with the originator/sponsor and the prospective investors (although some underwriters use auctions).

The lead underwriters purchase most of the new-issue ABS, and the balance is typically sold to ‘junior’ syndicate members (who presumably can arrange to buy more Asset-Backed Securities from the lead underwriters than were allocated to them).

In essence, the true price-demand characteristics and negotiability of junior underwriting-syndicate members are hidden simply because of the structure of the underwriting/bidding process. Hence, the existing syndicate-based ABS distribution system for new issue Asset-Backed Securities distorts the true demand for the ABS, clearly reduces competition, and facilitates and results in collusion, and therefore constitutes violations of the Sherman Act and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Antitrust statutes.

(b) Similarly, the ABS allocation process is not transparent. The lead underwriter and junior underwriters allocate new-issue ABS to investors based on subjectively determined ‘suitability’ and also ‘in-house criteria’. There are no established or generally accepted important guidelines for such ‘in-house’ criteria and associated allocation.

The lead and junior underwriters can typically collude to determine that only certain investors deemed appropriate are allocated the Asset-Backed Securities in question. Hence, the antitrust violation (collusion) occurs solely because of the underwriters’ discretionary choice of investors to whom ABS are allocated. This is more evident where the poll of investors consists mostly of institutional investors – so that final offering prices are more sensitive to choice of investors, and prices can change significantly simply by changes in allocation to investors. In such circumstances, the collusion is reasonably inferable here, so long as there are no statutory or generally accepted allocation criteria that have been approved by the NASD or other trade associations.

I-4: Price formation:
The prices of ABS securities may often be linked to the prices/yields of US Treasury bonds – the credit risk of ABS/MBS being priced relative to the risks of US Treasury bonds.

• This system distorts the true demand and supply balance for the ABS/MBS, and erroneously incorporates the demand/supply relationships of the US Treasury Bond market, into the ABS/MBS markets. The key question then, is whether there are conditions under which the US Treasury Bond market is completely de-coupled from the ABS market: or, phrased differently, whether there is sufficient justification for actual or perceived de-coupling of the US Treasury Bond market and the US ABS market. These conditions are as follows:

(1): The credit fundamentals of the US Treasury market differ substantially from those of the ABS market. (The Treasury market is much more sensitive to US Federal Reserve actions, currency fluctuations, consumer spending, Federal/State fiscal policies, etc.). The ABS market tends to be more sensitive to industry-specific and sometimes company-specific risks/factors.

(2): The use of various credit enhancement techniques and products further exacerbates the differences in the credit trends and/or quality in the US Treasury and ABS markets. In Asset-Backed Securities transactions, most forms of credit enhancement create a floor, but do not limit or affect other industry exposures or company exposures. In the US Treasury market, investors are subject to a greater variety of risks.

(3): Investors’ objectives in the US Treasury Bond markets differ from those of investors in Asset-Backed Securities markets. Hence, investors are very likely to view these two markets and the underlying risks differently, and should value the securities differently.

I-5: Vertical foreclosure:

In the ABS/MBS markets, some investment banks and commercial banks are active in almost all phases of the securitization process: origination (through in-house conduits); due diligence; disclosure and pricing; new issue securities offerings; and also in secondary-market trading. Similarly, non-bank entities can use their own asset portfolios (the origination of credit card receivables or mortgage receivables), shelf-registration and marketing procedures and/or Regulation-D/Rule 144A procedures (pricing and new-issue offerings) and in-house trading (secondary-market trading) to participate in almost all aspects of securitization processes.

Hence, these companies have almost no incentive to, and are not required to make their infrastructure and relationships available to competitors.

• Such vertical foreclosure constitutes violation of US antitrust laws.

I-6: Tying (36):

This arises in the following manner:

(a): The sponsor is sometimes formally or informally required to purchase other financial services (loans, letters of credit, custody services, etc.) from the investment bank, in order to effect the securitization transaction;

(b): The investors are sometimes required simultaneously to purchase two or more tranches of an ABS offering, or to promise to buy the same or similar ABS/MBS securities in order to be allocated ABS in new offerings;

(c): The sponsor and or investment bank may formally or informally require investors to purchase minimum dollar volume of ABS in specific offerings in order to be eligible for ‘allocations’ in future offerings. These acts constitute tying, which is anticompetitive and therefore illegal.

I-7: Price-fixing (37):

The Locus-shifting Theory is introduced here. Locus-shifting occurs when a potential and obvious party to a price-fixing scheme is effectively replaced (in pricing negotiations) by a third party that has the resources and willingness to alter dramatically the pricing of goods and services in either the transaction, or via a series of transactions or in the sector or the industry as a whole. Normally, price-fixing would occur between two sponsors or two intermediary banks.

Since the intermediary-investment bank is central to ABS offerings, and associated pricing and negotiations, the price fixing should be deemed to occur between the sponsor/originator and the investment bank (or between two sponsors).

Since each active investment binstitution typically underwrites many offerings simultaneously, and essentially controls the pricing of each new-issue ABS, the investment banks are the locus of said price fixing and are potentially liable for the associated antitrust violations. Further evidence of price fixing maybe obtained by analysing:

(a): The yield differentials of various ABS offerings in various asset classes (ie. automobiles, home equity, mortgages, etc.) by different sponsors within a specific block of time;

(b): The price differentials of various ABS offerings in various asset classes (autos, home equity, credit cards, mortgages, etc.) with the same rating, within a specific block of time.

I-8: Price-fixing (38):

Exclusive contracts facilitate and enhance anti-competitive behavior by contractually restricting conduct by and trade among participants in the market. In the US ABS/MBS markets, existing illegal exclusive contracts include:

(a) Contracts preventing the intermediary investment bank from providing financial services to other prospective securitization sponsor-companies in the same industry/sector;

(b) Contracts (by the sponsor, underwriter(s) or third parties) that prevent or limit the formation of a syndicate of securities dealers;

(c) Contracts that prevent the sponsor from selling securities through other underwriters, other than an appointed intermediary investment bank. These types of contract constitute direct violations of US Antitrust statutes.

I-9: Price-fixing (39):

There are several classes of Asset-Backed Securities:

(1): Securities that involve pure ‘pass-through’ of cash- flows, and hence rights to payment of cash from the SPV pool, but no ownership interest in the pool to:

(a): Interest-Only (IO) securities;
(b): Principal-Only (PO) securities; and:
(c): ‘Traditional’ Asset-Backed Securities that pay both interest and principal.

(2): Securities that confer ownership interests in the underlying pool to:

(a): Interest-Only (IO) securities;
(b): Principal-Only (PO) securities; and:
(c): ‘Traditional’ Asset-Backed Securities that pay both interest and principal.

(3): Debt-type securities that involve a security interest in the underlying collateral:
these manifest themselves as:

(a): Interest-Only (IO) securities;
(b): Principal-Only (PO) securities; and:
(c): ‘Traditional’ Asset-Backed Securities that pay both interest and principal.

In many instances, the Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) offers many tranches in each of the above-mentioned classes of ABS. The tranches within each class typically vary by term, interest rate, duration, and bond-rating/risk-rating. Hence, in any situation where the tranches don’t have any priority as to security interests or rights-to-payment of cash flows from the pool, such stratified offerings within each class (‘IO’, or ‘PO’ or ordinary; or ‘pass-through’, collateral-type or equity-interest) constitute price discrimination because the underlying ‘asset’ and risk is essentially the same, although different securities are being offered in the same transaction (or in a series of transactions), at different prices to investors, based on the same underlying pool of assets.

• The distinguishing and critical element is that there is no contractually agreed-upon priority of claims as to security interests or right-to-payment of cash from the pool of assets.

I-10: Predatory pricing (40):

This occurs when investment banks under-price ABS offerings in order to obtain more investors, and to build name recognition for a particular issuer (that does or intends to come to the ABS market regularly). Evidence of predatory pricing may be inferred or established by:

(a): Comparing the offering prices of various new-issue ABS bonds sold by one sponsor/originator, in the same asset class (auto loans, home equity, credit cards, etc.), but at different times of the year, to offering prices of similar ABS bonds sold by other regular ABS sponsors/originators in the same time periods.

(b): Running regressions to identify any statistically significant relationship between:

(1): The difference in the yield of company XYZ’s ABS bond and the yields of other similar Asset-Backed Securities bonds; and:

(2): Various independent variables such as yield, price, asset type, bond rating, duration, industry, amount of offering, frequency of ABS offerings, types of investors, etc..

(c): Comparing the offering prices of various new-issue ABS bonds underwritten by one investment bank (in the same asset class, but at different times of the year) to offering prices of similar Aset-Back Securities bonds underwritten by other investment banks in the same time periods.

I-11: Rigging of allocations:

Most Asset-Backed Securities offerings are done via allocations of securities by investment banks to their brokerage customers:

(1): Most sponsors issue their Asset-Backed Securities or Mortgage-Backed Securities through bids by investment banks. Most bids for ABS securities are won by a few investment banking firms.

• This may suggest that customers have been ‘allocated’ among investment banks, which is also an indication of collusion.

(2): On occasion, the primary underwriters subcontract work (re-sell securities)
to secondary underwriters.

J: SECURITIZATION INVOLVES VOID CONTRACTS
The process of securitization involves several contracts that are either signed simultaneously or are all signed within a short timeframe. Many of these contracts are void and wholly illegal due to:

(a) Lack of consideration (41): There is no consideration in many contracts used in effecting securitizations. Many of these contracts are unilateral executory undertakings and contain illusory promises. There are three main issues:

(1): Unilateral Executory Promise (42): A unilateral executory promise is not consideration.
The following are some unilateral executory contracts in securitizations:

• The promise made by the Special Purpose Vehicle to pay out periodic interest, whether contingent or non-contingent on whether the collateral pays cash interest.

• Collateral-substitution Agreements contain a promise whereby
the sponsor agrees to substitute impaired collateral.

• Assignment Agreement: Assignment of future collateral (not yet existing)
may be deemed a unilateral executory promise by the assignor.

• Transfer Agreement: The sponsor agrees to transfer the collateral to the Special Purpose Vehicle, and the SPV in return pays cash to the sponsor.

(2): Illusory Promises (43): An illusory promise is not a valid consideration for a contract.

The following are some illusory promises inherent in securitization transactions:

• The Subscription/Purchase Agreement: The SPV’s promises to acquire the collateral with the cash raised from investors are essentially illusory promises. These promises are embedded in the offering Prospectus, but are typically not included other corporate documents. In most cases, the offering Prospectuses don’t state the exact steps in the SPV’s promised purchase of the collateral.

• The Purchase or Subscription Agreement: The Special Purpose Vehicle’s investors purchase beneficial interests in the SPV or the SPV’s debt. These beneficial interests evidence:

(a): The right to receive payments from the SPV; or:
(b): An ownership interest in the underlying collateral, or:
(c): A ‘participation’ in the underlying collateral.

However, at the time of executing this agreement, the only consideration that the SPV can grant to investors in exchange for the purchase amount, consists of promises to purchase the collateral in the future, and to make payments from the SPV’s assets.

Hence, an existing asset is being exchanged for a future asset that does not exist as of the date of the purchase/subscription agreement.

• Furthermore, all securitization offerings are done pursuant to ‘Subscription Agreements’ and likewise pursuant to Investor Questionnaires – both of which documents have to be signed by the prospective investor. None of the agreements signed by the investor as part of his/her purchase of the Special Purpose Vehicle’s Asset-Backed Securities expressly incorporates the promises that are embodied in the offering Prospectus. What typically exists is an implied agreement to subject the investor to the SPV’s articles of incorporation, Trust Indenture, and or Trustees’/Board of Directors’ (or Board of Trustees’) decisions.

• The SPV’s promise to pay interest/dividends on ABS IOs, Preferreds and POs are essentially illusory promises because the underlying collateral may not produce any cash flows: so there won’t be interest/dividend payments.

(3): No Bargain: Some courts have held that there is no consideration (and hence, the contract is void) where one party was not allowed to bargain for the alleged agreement (44).

In some securitizations, the process of setting offering prices for new Asset-Backed Securities issues does not afford all parties the opportunity to negotiate terms of the offering, especially individual investors, because the price of the ABS is typically determined primarily by the sponsor and the lead underwriters. Furthermore, in securitizations, the originator sets the terms of the Special Purpose Vehicle (trust documents, articles of incorporation, bylaws, etc.).

(4): No mutuality (45): In the securitization context, for there to be mutuality:

(a): Each party must have firm control of the subject matters of the contract and the underlying assets (consideration), and:
(b): There should/MUST be a direct contractual relationship between the parties concerned. At time of the Subscription Agreement, the Special Purpose Vehicle typically does not own or have rights to the collateral, and hence, there is not mutuality.

Furthermore, the concept of ‘piercing the SPV veil’ is introduced here (similar to ‘piercing the corporate veil’) and applies, since the following conditions exist:

• The economics of the transaction are an asset transfer from the sponsor/originator party to the Special Purpose Vehicle investors, in exchange for a loan to the sponsor.

• However, there is no direct contractual relationship.

• The sponsor typically controls the Special Purpose Vehicle before the Asset-Backed Securities offering and thus determines (or very substantially influences) the SPV’s post-offering operating characteristics. Since the prospective ABS investors don’t have firm pre-offering control of the SPV and cannot influence its post-offering policies, there is no mutuality between the SPV and the ABS investors; and securitization is accordingly void.

• The sponsor influences the appointment of the SPV’s Trustees or Board of Directors.
Thus, under contract law, the use of the Special Purpose Vehicle in securitization effectively eliminates any mutuality between the two main contracting parties: the sponsor and the investors. Secondly, there is no mutuality between the Special Purpose Vehicle and the investors:

• The Special Purpose Vehicle’s corporate documents (trust indentures or bylaws or articles of incorporation) typically limit the rights of each ABS investors and the group of Asset-Backed Securities investors.

Thirdly, there is no mutuality at all between the Special Purpose Vehicle and the sponsor/originator, because both entities are essentially the same, and are controlled by the sponsor before and after the securitization takes place.

(5): Illegal subject matter and contravention of public policy 46: As explained in preceding sections of this analysis, securitization constitutes violations of the Antitrust laws and US Federal R.I.C.O. statutes; and hence, the contracts used to effect securitizations are void and illegal.

CONCLUSION:
Under US legislation, Securitization is MANIFESTLY ILLEGAL.

Notes and References:

(1): Yamazaki Kenji, What makes Asset Securitization Inefficient? (2005); Berkeley Electronic Press, Working Paper #603; Steven Schwarcz, Enron and The Use and Abuse of Special Purpose Entities In Corporate Structures, 70 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1309 (2002); See further: Carlson D. (1998), The Rotten Foundations of Securitization, William & Mary Law Review, 39; Lupica L (2000), Circumvention of The Bankruptcy Process: The Statutory Institutionalization of Securitization, Connecticut Law Review, 33: 199-210; Thomas Plank, 2004, The Security of Securitization and The Future of Security, 25 Cardozo L. Rev. 1655 (2004).

(2): On securitization, see: Eastgroup Properties v. Southern Motel Association, Ltd., 935 F.2d 245 (11th Cir. 1991); Union Savings Bank v. Augie/Restivo Baking Co. (In Re Augie/Restivo Baking Co.), 860 F.2d 515 (2d Cir. 1988); In Re Bonham, 229 F.3d 750 (9th Cir. 2000); In Re Central European Industrial Development Company LLC, 288 B.R. 572 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 2003); Special Report by the TriBar Opinion Committee, Opinions in the Bankruptcy Context: Rating Agency, Structured Financing, and Chapter 11 Transactions, 46 Business Lawyer 717 (1991); Sargent, Bankruptcy Remote Finance Subsidiaries: The Substantive Consolidation Issue, 44 Business Lawyer 1223 (1989). See In re Kingston Square Associates, 214 B.R. 713 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1997). On “True-sale” and “signment” distinctions, see: Major’s Furniture Mart, Inc. v. Castle Credit Corporation, Inc., 602 F.2d 538 (3rd Cir. 1979); In re Major Funding Corporation, 82 B.R. 443 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 1987); Fox v. Peck Iron and Metal Company, Inc., 25 B.R. 674 (Bankr. S.D. Cal. 1982); Carter v. Four Seasons Funding Corporation, 97 S.W.3d. 387 (Ark. 2003); A.B. Lewis Co. v. Nat’l Investment Co. of Houston, 421 S.W.2d 723 (Tex. Civ. App. – 14th Dist. 1967); Resolution Trust Corp. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. of Illinois, 25 F.3d 570, 578 (7th Cir. 1994); In re Royal Crown Bottlers of North Alabama, Inc., 23 B.R. 28 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 1982) (addressing ‘reasonably equivalent value’ in transfer by parent to subsidiary); Butner v. United States, 440 U.S. 48 (U.S. 1979); In re Schick, 246 B.R. 41, 44 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2000): (State law determines the extent of the debtor’s interest; bankruptcy law determines whether that interest is “property of the estate”).

See specifically: Homburger & Andre, Real Estate Sale and Leaseback Transactions and the Risk of Recharacterization in Bankruptcy, 24 Real Property, Probate and Trust Journal 95, (1989). See: In re Integrated Health Services, Inc., 260 B.R. 71 (Bankr. Del. 2001).

See: HSBC Bank v. United Air Lines, Inc., 317 B.R. 335 (N.D. Ill. 2004). See: Jonathan C. Lipson, Enron, Asset Securitization and Bankruptcy Reform: Dead or Dormant?, 11 J. Bankr. L. & Prac. 1 (2002). See: Peter J. Lahny IV, Asset Securitization: A Discussion of the Traditional Bankrupt Attacks and an Analysis of the Next Potential Attack, Substantive Consolidation, 9 Am. Bankr. Inst. L. Rev. 815 (2001). See: Lois R. Lupica, Revised Article 9, Securitization Transactions and the Bankruptcy Dynamic, 9 Am. Bankr. Inst. L. Rev. 287 (2001). See: Lois R. Lupica, Circumvention of the Bankruptcy Process: The Statutory Institutionalization of Securitization, 33 Conn. L. Rev. 199 (2000). See further: Lois R. Lupica, Asset Securitization: The Unsecured Creditors Perspective, 76 Tex. L. Rev. 595 (1998). See: Stephen I. Glover, Structured Finance Goes Chapter 11: Asset Securitization by the Reorganizing Companies, 47 Bus. Law 611, 627 (1992). See: Thomas J. Gordon, Securitization of Executory Future Flows as Bankruptcy-Remote True Sales, 67 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1317, 1322-23 (2000).

See: In Re Kingston Square Assocs., 214 B.R. 713 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1997) (creditors brought an involuntary petition against an SPV).

(3): On corporate governance issues pertaining to SPVs and securitization see the following materials: See: In Re Buckhead America Corp., #s 91-978 through 91-986 (Bankr. D. Del, Aug. 13, 1992); In Re Minor Emergency Center of Tamarac Inc., 45 BR 310 (Bankr. SD.FL., 1985); Revlon Inc. v. Mac andrews & Forbes Holdings, 506 A2d 173 (Del. 1986); In Re Kingston Square Associates, 214 BR 713 (Bnakr. SDNY 197).

See: Sheryl Gussset, A Not-So-Independent Director In A Bankruptcy Remote Structure, 17 Am. Bankr. Inst. J. 24 (1998). See: Roberg Dean Ellis, Securitization, Fiduciary Duties and Bondholders Rights, 24 J. Corp. L. 295 (1999). See: Richard Graf, Use of LLCs As Bankruptcy Proof Entities Widens, National L. J. , April 10, 1995 at B16. See: Schwarcz Steven, Enron and The Use and Abuse of Special Purpose Entities In Corporate Structures, 70 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1309 (2002). See: Schwarcz, Steven, Securitization Post-Enron, 25 Cardozo L. Rev. 1539 (2004). See also: Thomas Plank, 2004 Symposium: The Security of Securitization and The Future of Security, 25 Cardozo L. Rev. 1655 (2004). See: Thomas H, Effects of Asset Securitization On Seller Claimants, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 10: 306-330. See also: Nolan, Anthony, Synthetic Securitizations and Derivatives Transactions by Banks: Selected Regulatory Issues, Journal of Structured Finance, Fall 2006.

See: American Securitization Forum, ASF Securitization Institute: The Securitization Legal and Regulatory Framework, 2006. See: Yamazaki, Kenji, What makes Asset Securitization Inefficient? Working Paper # 603, Berkeley Electronic Press.

(4): See: Schwarcz S. (1999). Rethinking Freedom of Contract: A Bankruptcy Paradigm, Texas Law Review, 77: 515-599. See: Klee K & Butler, Asset-Backed Securitization, Special Purpose Vehicles and Other Securitization Issues. Uniform Commercial Code Law Journal, 35( 2). See: Carlson D (1998). The Rotten Foundations of Securitization, William & Mary Law Review, 39: See: Janger, Edward J, Muddy Rules For Securitizations, Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 2002. See: Lois R. Lupica, Circumvention of the Bankruptcy Process: The Statutory Institutionalization of Securitization, 33 CONN. L. REV. 199 (2000). See: Steven L. Schwarcz, The Inherent Irrationality of Judgment Proofing, 52 STAN. L. REV. 1 (1999). See: S. 420, 107th Cong. 912 (2001); H.R. 333, 107th Cong. 912 (2001). See: Steven L. Schwarcz, The Impact on Securitization of Revised UCC Article 9, 74 Cm. KENT L. REV. 947 (1999) (“Revised Article 9 attempts to broaden its coverage to virtually all securitized assets”). See: Claire A. Hill, Securitization: A Low-Cost Sweetener for Lemons, 74 WASH. U. L.Q. 1061 (1996). See: Yamazaki Kenji, What makes Asset Securitization Inefficient? (2005); Berkeley Electronic Press, Working Paper #603. See: Saayman, Andrea, Securitization and Bank Liquidity In South Africa, Working Paper, Potchefstroom University, South Africa.

See: Sargent Patrick, Structural and Legal Issues in Commercial Mortgage Securitization Transactions, November 1, 2004.

(5): See: Schwarcz S. (2004). Is Securitization Legitimate? International Financial Law Review, 2004 Guide To Structured Finance, pp.115. See additionally: Schwarcz S (2002). The Universal Language of International Securitization, Duke (University) Journal of Comparative and International Law, 12:285-300. See: Frankel T., Cross-Border Securitization: Without Law But Not Lawless, Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 8: 255-265.

See further: Kanda H. Securitization In Japan, Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 8: 359-370. See: Klee K & Butler B. Asset-Backed Scuritization, Special Purpose Vehicles and Other Securitization Issues, Uniform Commercial Code Law Review, 35(3):23-33. See: Higgin E & Mason J. (2004). What Is The Value of Recourse To ABS? A Study of The Credit Card Bank ABS Rescue, Journal of Banking & Finance, 28(4):857-874. See: Carlson D (1998), The Rotten Foundations of Securitization, William & Mary Law Review, 39: See: Elmer P., Conduits: Their Structure and Risk, FDIC Banking Review, pp. 27-40.

See: Dawson P. Ratings Games With Contingent Transfer: A Structured Finance Illusion, Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 8: 381-391.

(6): See: Fogie v. Thorn, 95 F3d 645 (CA8, 1996) (cert. den.) 520 US 1166; Police v. National Tax Funding LP, 225 F3d 379 (CA3, 2000); Najarro v. SASI Intern. Ltd, 904 F2d 1002 (CA5, 1990) (cert. den.) 498 US 1048; Video Trax v. Nationsbank NA, 33 Fsupp2d 1041 (S.D.Fla.,1998) (affirmed) 205 F3d 1358(cert. den.) 531 US 822; In Re Tammy Jewels, 116 BR 290 (M.D.Fla., 1990); and: ECE technologies v. Cherrington Corp., 168 F3d 201 (CA5, 1999); Colony Creek Ltd. v. RTC, 941 F2d 1323 (CA5, 1991) (rehearing denied); Sterling Property Management v. Texas Commerce Bank, 32 F3d 964 (CA5, 1994); Pearcy Marinev. Acadian offshore Services, 832 Fsupp 192 (S.D.TX, 1993); In Re Venture Mortgage Fund LP, 245 BR 460 (SDNY, 2000); In Re Donnay, 184 BR 767 (D.Minn, 1995); Johnson v. Telecash Inc., 82 FSupp2d 264 (D.Del., 1999) (reversed in part) 225 F2d 366 (cert. denied) 531 US 1145; Shelton v. Mutual Savings & Loan Association, 738 FSupp 50 (E.D.Mich., 1990); S.E.C. v. Elmas Trading Corporation, 638 F. Supp 743 (D.Nevada, 1987) (affirmed) 865 F2d 265; contrast: J2 Smoke Shop Inc. v. American Commercial Capital Corp., 709 FSupp 422 (SDNY 1989) (cost of funds); In Re Powderburst Corp., 154 BR 307 (E.D.Cal. 1993) (original issue discount); In Re Wright, 256 BR 626 (D.Mont., 2000) (difference between the face amount and amount actually recovered or owed by debtor); In Re MCCorhill Pub. Inc., 86 BR 283 (SDNY 1988); In Re Marill Alarm Systems, 81 BR 119 (S.D.Fla., 1987) (affirmed) 861 F2d 725; In Re Dent, 130 BR 623 (S.D.GA, 1991); In Re Evans, 130 BR 357 (S.D.GA, 1991); contrast: In Re Cadillac Wildwood Development, 138 BR 854 (W.D. Mich., 1992) (closing costs are interest costs); In Re Brummer, 147 BR 552 (D.Mont., 1992); In Re Sunde, 149 BR 552 (D.Minn., 1992); Matter of Worldwide Trucks, 948 F2d 976 (CA5,1991) (agreement concerning applicable interest rate may be established by course of conduct); Lovick v. Ritemoney Ltd, 378 F3d 433 (CA5, 2004); In Re Shulman Transport, 744 F2d 293 (CA2, 1984); Torelli v. Esposito, 461 NYS2d 299 (1983) (reversed) 483 NYS2d 204; Reschke v. Eadi, 447 NYS2d 59 (NYAD4, 1981); Elghanian v. Elghanian, 717 NYS2d 54( NYAD1, 2000) (leave to appeal denied) 729 NYS2d 410 (here, there was no consideration in exchange for loan, and transaction violated usury laws); Karas v. Shur, 592 NYS2d 779 (NYAD2, 1993); Simsbury Fund v. New St. Louis Associates, 611 NYS2d 557 (NYAD1, 1994); Rhee v. Dahan, 454 NYS2d 371 (NY.Sup., 1982); Hamilton v. HLT Check Exchange, LLP, 987 F. Supp. 953 (E.D. Ky. 1997); Turner v. E-Z Check Cashing of Cookeville, TN, Inc., 35 F.Supp.2d 1042 (M.D. Tenn. 1999); Hurt v. Crystal Ice & Cold Storage Co., 286 S.W. 1055, 1056-57 (Ky. 1926); Phanco v. Dollar Financial Group., Case No. CV99-1281 DDP (C.D. Cal., filed Feb. 8, 1999). See: Van Voris, B. (May 17, 1999) ‘‘Payday’ Loans Under Scrutiny’, National Law Journal, p. B1.

(7): See: 26 U.S.C. § 7201. 26 USC Subtitle F, Chapter 75.
See: Cheek v. United States, 498 U.S. 192 (1991).

(8): SEC v. Towers Financial Corp. et al., 93 Civ. 744 (WK) (S.D.N.Y.)

(9): See: Schwarcz Steven, Enron and The Use and Abuse of Special Purpose Entities In Corporate Structures, 70 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1309 (2002). See: Schwarcz, Steven, Securitization Post-Enron, 25 Cardozo L. Rev. 1539 (2004). See: Thomas Plank, 2004 Symposium: The Security of Securitization and The Future of Security, 25 Cardozo L. Rev. 1655 (2004).

See further: Thomas H., Effects of Asset Securitization On Seller Claimants, Journal of financial Intermediation, 10: 306-330. See: Yamazaki, Kenji, What Makes Asset Securitization Inefficient? Working Paper # 603, Berkeley Electronic Press.

(10): The Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act reads as follows:

SECTION 4: TRANSFERS FRAUDULENT AS TO PRESENT AND FUTURE CREDITORS:

(a) A transfer made or obligation incurred by a debtor is fraudulent as to a creditor, whether the creditor’s claim arose before or after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred, if:

(1) with actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any creditor of the debtor; or (2) without receiving a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the transfer or obligation, and the debtor:

(i): was engaged or was about to engage in a business or a transaction for which the remaining assets of the debtor were unreasonably small in relation to the business or transaction; or:
(ii): intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he [or she] would incur, debts that would be beyond his [or her] ability to pay as they became due.

(b) In determining actual intent under subsection (a)(1), consideration may be given, among other factors, to whether:

(1): The transfer or obligation was to an insider;
(2): The debtor retained possession or control of the property transferred after the transfer;
(3): The transfer or obligation was disclosed or concealed;
(4): Before the transfer was made or obligation was incurred, the debtor had been sued or threatened with suit;
(5): The transfer was of substantially all the debtor’s assets;
(6): The debtor absconded;
(7): The debtor removed or concealed assets;
(8): The value of the consideration received by the debtor was reasonably equivalent to the value of the asset transferred or the amount of the obligation incurred;
(9): The debtor was insolvent or became insolvent shortly after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred;
(10): The transfer occurred shortly before or shortly after a substantial debt was incurred; and:
(11): The debtor transferred the essential assets of the business to a lienor who transferred the assets to an insider of the debtor. Under both the US Bankruptcy Code and UFTA (Section 544 of the US Bankruptcy Code also allows unsecured creditors to sue in Federal Bankruptcy Court using applicable State), judges must determine whether there has been Fraudulent Conveyance. Courts have developed a series of factors as criteria for proving the requisite intent. The factors to be considered (“badges of fraud”) in determining Fraudulent Conveyance include:

• Whether the transfer represented substantially all of the debtor’s assets.
• Whether the transfer was made around the time a substantial debt was incurred.
• Whether the debtor received reasonable consideration equivalent to the value of the assets conveyed or the obligation incurred.
• Whether the debtor became insolvent soon after the transfer.
• Whether the transfer was made to insiders or family members.
• Whether the transfer or the assets were concealed

(11): See: Roman Dan, Sarlito M & Mukhtiar A (Winter 2007), Risks to Consider when purchasing Technology-based IP for Securitization, Working Paper. See additionally: Nolan Anthony, Synthetic Securitizations and Derivatives Transactions by Banks: Selected Regulatory Issues, The Journal of Structured Finance, Fall 2006. See: Lucas Douglas, Goodman Laurie & Fabozzi Frank, Hybrid Assets in an ABS CDO: Structural Advantages and Cash Flow Mechanics, Journal of Structured Finance (Fall 2006). See further: Prince, Jeffrey, A General Review of CDO Valuation Methods, Journal of Structured and Project Finance (Summer 2006).

(12): See: Peter V. Pantaleo et al., Rethinking the Role of Recourse in the Sale of Financial Assets, 52 Bus. Law. 159, 159-63 (1996) (discussing types of permissible and impermissible recourse for sale treatment). See: Thomas E. Plank, The True Sale of Loans and the Rôle of Recourse, 14 GEO. MASON L. Rev. 287 (1991). See: Gordon T (2000). Securitization of Executory Future Flows As bankruptcy-Remote True Sales, University of Chicago Law Review, 67:1317-1322. See: Higgin E & Mason J (2004). What Is The value of Recourse To Asset-Backed Securities? A Study of Credit Card Bank ABS Rescues, Journal of Banking & Finance, 28(4); 857-874.

(13): See: Peter V. Pantaleo et al., Rethinking the Rôle of Recourse in the Sale of Financial Assets, 52 Bus. Law. 159, 159-63 (1996) (discussing types of permissible and impermissible recourse for sale treatment); See: Thomas E. Plank, The True Sale of Loans and the Role of Recourse, 14 GEO. MASON L. Rev. 287 (1991). See: Higgin E. & Mason J. (2004), What Is The value of Recourse To Asset-Backed Securities? A Study of Credit Card Bank ABS Rescues, The Journal of Banking & Finance, 28(4); 857-874. See: Lois R. Lupica, Revised Article 9, Securitization Transactions and the Bankruptcy Dynamic, 9 AM. BANKR. INST. L. REV. 287, 291-92 (2001). See: Carol M. Rose, Crystals and Mud in Property Law, 40 STAN. L. REV. 577, 600 (1988). See: Louis Kaplow, Rules Versus Standards: An Economic Analysis, 42 Duke L.J. 557 (1992).

(14): See: Yamazaki, Kenichi, What makes Asset Securitization Inefficient?, 2005.
Working Paper #603, Berkeley Electronic Press.

(15): See: Yamazaki (2005), supra.

(16): See: Schwarcz (2002), supra. See: Schwarcz (2004), supra. See: Klee & Butler, supra. See: Lipson J C (2002). Enron, Asset Securitization and Bankruptcy Reform: Dead or Dormant? Journal
of Bankruptcy Law & Practice, 11: 1-15. See: Lupica L (2001). Revised Articles Nine, Securitization Transactions and The Bankruptcy Dynamic, American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review, 9:287-299. See: Garmaise M (2001), Rational Beliefs and Security Design, Review of Financial Studies, 14(4):1183-1213. See: David A (1997), Controlling Information Premia by Repackaging Asset Backed Securities, Journal of Risk & Insurance, 64(4):619-648. See: DeMarzo P (2005), The Pooling and Tranching of Securities: A Model of Informed Intermediation, Review of Financial Studies, 18(1):1-35. See further: Report by The Committee On Bankruptcy and Corporate Reorganization of The Association of The Bar of The City of New York (2000): New Developments In Structured Finance, The Business Lawyer, 56: 95-105. See: Lupica L (2000), Circumvention of The Bankruptcy Process: The Statutory Institutionalization of Securitization, Connecticut Law Review, 33:199-209.

See further: Glover S (1992), Structured Finance Goes Chapter Eleven: Asset Securitization by the Reorganizing Companies, The Business Lawyer, 47:611-621. See: Gordon T (2000), Securitization of Executory Future Flows as bankruptcy-Remote True Sales, The University of Chicago Law Review, 67:1317-1322. See: Elmer P., Conduits: Their Stricture and Risk, FDIC Banking Review, pp.27-40. See: Lois R. Lupica, Revised Article 9, Securitization Transactions and the Bankruptcy Dynamic, 9 AM. BANKR. INST. L. REV. 287, 291-92 (2001). See: Steven L. Schwarcz, The Inherent Irrationality of Judgment Proofing, 52 STAN. L. REV. 1 (1999). See: Lynn M. LoPucki, The Irrefutable Logic of Judgment Proofing: A Reply to Professor Schwarcz, 52 STAN. L. REV. 55 (1999). See: Steven L. Schwarcz, The Impact on Securitization of Revised UCC Article 9, 74 Cm.KENT L. REV. 947 (1999) (“Revised Article 9 attempts to broaden its coverage to virtually all securitized assets”).

See: Christopher W. Frost, Asset Securitization and Corporate Risk Allocation, 72 TUL. L. REV. 101 (1997); See: Claire A. Hill, Securitization: A Low-Cost Sweetener for Lemons, 74 WASH. U. L. Q. 1061 (1996). See: Steven L. Schwarcz, Judgment Proofing: A Rejoinder, 52 STAN. L. REV. 77 (1999).

(17): See: Reams B & Manz W (eds.), FEDERAL BANKRUPTCY LAW: A LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF THE BANKRUPTCY REFORM ACT OF 1994. See further: The Legislative History of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005; (FRB Leg. Hist); (S. 256 -LoC); Pub. L. 109-8, April 20, 2005, 119 Stat, 23. http://www.llsdc.org/sourcebook/leg-hist.htm.

See: Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978: A Legislative History, Hein. See: Federal Bankruptcy Law: A Legislative History of The Bankruptcy Act of 1994; Pub. L. No. 103-394, 108 Stat. 4106, including the National Bankruptcy Commission Act and Bankruptcy Amendments (1987-1993).

See further: Ahern, Lawrence (Spring 2001). “Workouts” Under Revised Article Nine: A Review of Changes and Proposal For Study, American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review, 9:115-125.

See also: Ribstein, Larry & Kobayashi, Bruce (1996), An Economic Analysis of Uniform State Laws, Journal of Legal Studies, 25(1):131-199.

(18): See: Ashta A & Tolle L (2000), Criteria for Selecting Restructuring Strategies for Distressed or Declining Enterprises, Cahners Du Ceren, 6:1-20. See: Carlson D (1998). The Rotten Foundations of Securitization, William & Mary Law Review, 39. See: Higgin E & Mason J (2004), What is the value of Recourse to Asset-Backed Securities? A Study of Credit Card Bank ABS Rescues, in the Journal of Banking & Finance, 28(4); 857-874. See: Albany Insurance v. Esses, 831 F2d 41 (CA2, 1987) (making false statements about value of asset was a “predicate act”); Howell Hydrocarbons v. Adams, 897 F2d 183 (CA5 1990) (under Federal R.I.C.O. statutes, making a company look solvent when its not, constitutes a ‘predicate act’); The Matter of Lewisville Properties, 849 F2d 946 (CA5, 1988) (under Federal R.I.C.O., false pretenses constitutes ‘predicate acts’). See also: Bens D & Monahan S (Feb. 2005), Altering Investment Decisions to [conform to] Management Financial Reporting Outcomes: Asset Backed Commercial Paper Conduits and FIN 46, Working Paper.

(19): In the following cases, the named courts held that pre-petition waivers of the right to file for voluntary/involuntary bankruptcy, were unenforceable. See: In Re Huang, 275 F3d 1177 (CA9, 2002) (it is against public policy for a debtor to waive the pre-petition protection of the Bankruptcy Code); In Re South East Financial Associates, 21 BR 1003 (M.D.Fla, 1997); And: In Re Tru Block Concrete Products Ins., 27 BR 486 (E.D.Pa., 1995) (advance agreement to waive the benefits of bankruptcy law is void as against public policy); In Re Madison, 184 BR 686, 690 (E.D.Pa, 1995) (even bargained-for and knowing waivers of the right to seek bankruptcy protection must be deemed void); In Re Club Tower LP, 138 BR 307 at 312 (N.D.Ga, 1991); In Re Graves, 212 BR 692 (BAP, CA1, 1997); In Re Pease, 195 BR 431 (D.Neb., 1996); And: In Re Jenkins Court Associates Ltd. Partnership, 181 BR 33 (E.D.Pa., 1995); In Re Sky Group International Inc., 108 BR 86 (W.D.Pa., 1989); Association of St.Croix Condominium Owners v. St. Croix Hotel Corp., 692 F2d 446 (CA3, 1982).

But contrast: In Re University Commons LP, 200 BR 255 (M.D.Fla.) (debtors agreement that in the event debtor enters bankruptcy proceedings, the secured lender shall be entitled to court order dismissing the case as ‘bad faith’ filing an determining that: (i) no rehabilitation or reorganization is possible, and (ii) dismissing all creditor/ ABS-investor’s right to file for involuntary bankruptcy 21, 22: US courts have repeatedly asserted that bankruptcy proceedings are in the best interests of parties and all other creditors, and this is binding); In Re Little Creek Development, 779 F2d 1068 (CA5, 1986). See: 124 Congr. Record H 32, 401 (1978).

(20): There are several cases that hold that pre-petition waivers of the right to file for voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy, are enforceable: thus: In Re Shady Grove tech Center Associates Limited Partnership, 216 BR 386 (D.Md., 1998) (waiver of the right to file for bankruptcy is unenforceable) (opinion supplemented) 227 BR 422 (D.Md., 1998); In Re Atrium High Point Ltd. partnership, 189 BR 599 (MDNC 1995); In Re Darrell Creek Associates, 187 BR 908 (DSc, 1995); In Re Cheeks, 167 BR 817 (D.Sc, 1997); In Re McBride Estates, 154 BR 339 (N.D.Fla., 1993); In Re citadel Properties, 86 BR 275, MD.Fla., 1988); In Re Gulf Beach Development Corp., 48 BR 40 (M.D.Fla., 1985).

However, these cases are very distinguishable from standard securitization transactions because the following characteristics and/or conditions existed in these cases: (a) they involve only single-asset entities; (b) these entities had no employees; (c) the timing of filing of bankruptcy petition indicates an intent to delay or to frustrate creditors’ proper efforts to enforce their rights after a workout had failed; (d) there were no or few unsecured non-insider creditors (those existing had small claims); (e) there was no realistic chance of rehabilitation or reorganization; (f) the assets did not produce any cashflow.

(21): See cases cited in Notes 5, 6, 19 and 20.

(22): On pre-petition waivers of right to file for bankruptcy and waivers of bankruptcy stays, see: In re Huang, 275 F.3d 1173, 1177 (9th Cir. 2002) (“It is against public policy for a debtor to waive the pre-petition protection of the Bankruptcy Code”); In re Shady Grove Tech Center Assocs. Limited Partnership, 216 B.R. 386, 389 (Bankr. D. Md. 1998) (“The courts have uniformly held that a waiver of the right to file a bankruptcy case is unenforceable”); In re Tru Block Concrete Prods., Ins., 27 B.R. 486, 492 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1995) (advance agreement to waive the benefits conferred by bankruptcy law is void as against US public policy); In re Madison, 184 B.R 686, 690 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1995) (even bargained-for and knowing waivers of the right to seek bankruptcy protection must be deemed void); In re Club Tower L.P., 138 B.R. 307, 312 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1991); further, In re Orange Park S. Partnership, 79 B.R. 79, 82 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1987); In re Aurora Invs., 134 B.R. 982, 985 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1991) (debtor’s agreement that petition, if filed, would be in “bad faith” if its primary purpose is to delay foreclosure sale, is binding); In re University Commons, L.P., 200 B.R. 255, 259 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1996) (debtor’s agreement that in the event that debtor becomes subject of bankruptcy case secured lender shall be entitled to order dismissing case as “bad faith” filing and determining that (i) no rehabilitation or reorganization is possible, and (ii) dismissing all court proceedings is in the best interest of parties and all other creditors, is binding); In Re Little Creek Dev. Co., 779 F.2d 1068, 1073 (5th Cir. 1986). 47212 B.R. 1003, 1005 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1997). See: 124 Cong. Rec. H 32, 401 (1978) (“The explicit reference in Title-11 forbidding the waiver of certain rights is not intended to imply that other rights, such as the right to file a voluntary bankruptcy case under section 301, maybe waived”). See further: Klee, Kenneth & Butler, Brendt, Asset-backed Securitization, Special Purpose Vehicles and Other Securitization, Working Paper. Cases that enforced pre-petition waivers of the automatic stay focus upon:

(i): The financial sophistication of the borrower;
(ii): The creditor’s demonstration that significant consideration was given
for the pre-petition waiver;
(iii): The effect of the enforcement of the pre-petition waiver upon other
parties having legitimate interests in the outcome;
(iv): Circumstances of the parties at the time enforcement of the pre-petition waiver is sought;
(v): The enforcement of the pre-petition waiver being consistent
with public policy of encouraging out of court restructurings and settlements with creditors; and:
(vi): Other indicia which support granting relief from stay, such as “bad faith” criteria (i.e. single-asset case, two-party dispute, long history of pre-petition workouts, newly formed entity, filing on eve of foreclosure, no ongoing business to reorganize, few employees, no unencumbered funds, etc.). Cases that held that pre-petition stay waivers were enforceable include: In Re Shady Grove Tech Ctr. Assocs., L.P., 216 B.R.386, 390 (Bankr. D. Md. 1998); In Re Atrium High Point L.P., 189 B.R. 599, 607 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 1995); In Re Darrell Creek Assocs., L.P., 187 B.R. 908, 910 (Bankr. D.S.C. 1995); In Re Cheeks, 167 B.R. 817, 818 (Bankr. D.S.C. 1994); In Re Powers, 170 B.R. 480, 483 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1994); In Re McBride Estates, Ltd., 154 B.R. 339, 343 (Bankr. N.D. Fla. 1993); In Re Citadel Properties, Inc., 86 B.R. 275, 276 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1988); In Re Gulf Beach Development Corp., 48 B.R. 40, 43 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1985).

Several courts, however, have refused to enforce pre-petition waivers
for any of the following reasons:

(i): The pre-petition waiver is the equivalent to an ipso facto clause;
(ii): Such clause is void as against public policy by depriving the debtor
of the use and benefit of property upon the filing of a bankruptcy case;
(iii): The borrower lacks the capacity to act on behalf of the debtor in possession;
(iv): The debtor has a business with a reasonable chance at reorganization and enforcement of the waiver would otherwise prejudice third-party creditors;
(v): The automatic stay is designed to protect all creditors and may not be waived by the debtor unilaterally to the detriment of creditors; and:
(vi): The waiver was obtained by coercion, fraud or mutual mistake of facts. Courts that have refused to enforce pre-petition waivers of the automatic stay have reasoned that the automatic stay protects not only debtors but also other creditors. US Courts disagree sharply about the utility, benefits and desirability of the enforcement of pre-petition waivers, and relevant criteria. Some courts have held that a pre-petition automatic stay waiver may be considered as a factor in determining whether cause exists for relief from the stay.

See aslo: In Re Darrell Creek Assocs., L.P., 187 B.R. 908, 913 (Bankr. D.S.C. 1995) (“out of court workouts are to be encouraged and are often effective”); In Re Cheeks, 167 B.R. 817, 819 (Bankr. D.S.C. 1994) (“the most compelling reason for enforcement of the forbearance agreement is to further the public policy in favor of encouraging out of court restructuring and settlements”);
In Re Club Tower L.P., 138 B.R. 307, 312 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1991) (“enforcing pre-petition settlement agreements furthers the legitimate public policy of encouraging out of court restructurings and settlements”). Cases holding pre-petition automatic stay waivers unenforceable include: In Re Southeast Financial Assocs., Inc., 212 B.R. 1003, 1005 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1997); In Re Graves, 212 B.R. 692, 694 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. 1997); In Re Pease, 195 B.R. 431, 433 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1996); In Re Jenkins Court Assocs. L.P., 181 B.R. 33, 37 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1995);Farm Credit of Cent. Fla., ACA v. Polk, 160 B.R. 870, 873-74 (M.D. Fla. 1993); Farm Credit of Cent. Fla., ACA v. Polk, 160 B.R. 870, 873-74 (M.D. Fla. 1993) (”The policy behind the automatic stay is to protect the debtor‘s estate from being depleted by creditor’s lawsuits and seizures of property before the debtor has had a chance to marshal the estate’s assets and distribute them equitably among creditors“); In Re Sky Group Int’l, Inc., 108 B.R. 86, 89 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 1989) (”To grant a creditor relief from stay simply because the debtor elected to waive the protection afforded the debtor by the automatic stay ignores the fact that it also is designed to protect all creditors and to treat them equally“) (citing Assoc. of St. Croix Condominium Owners v. St. Croix Hotel Corp., 682 F.2d 446 (3d Cir. 1982)). Also see: In re Shady Grove Tech Ctr. Assocs., L.P., 216 B.R. 386, 393-94 (Bankr. D. Md. 1998); In re S.E. Fin. Assocs., Inc., 212 B.R. 1003, 1005 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1997); In re Darrell Creek Assocs., L.P., 187 B.R. 908, 910 (Bankr. D.S.C. 1995); In re Powers, 170 B.R. 480, 483 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1994); In re Cheeks, 167 B.R. 817, 819 (Bankr. D.S.C. 1994); In Re Shady Grove Tech Ctr. Assocs., L.P., 216 B.R. 386, 393-94 (Bankr. D. Md. 1998) (granting a stay relief for cause based upon a finding which included debtor’s pre-petition agreement not to contest request for stay relief given as part of pre-petition restructuring in which debtor was afforded substantial consideration). See: Steven L. Schwarcz, Rethinking Freedom of Contract: A Bankruptcy Paradigm, 77 Tex. L. Rev. 515 (1999). See: In Re Club Tower L.P., 138 B.R. 307, 311-12 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1991).

(23): See: Schwarcz S. (1999). Rethinking Freedom of Contract: A Bankruptcy Paradigm, Texas Law Review, 77: 515-599. See: Klee K & Butler B Asset-Backed Securitization, Special Purpose Vehicles and Other Securitization Issues, Uniform Commercial Code Law Journal, 35(2):. See: Carlson D (1998), The Rotten Foundations of Securitization, William & Mary Law Review, 39:

(24): See notes 5, 6, 19 and 20, supra.

(25): See: Shakespeare C (2003). Do Managers Use Securitization Volume and Fair Value Estimates To Hit Earning Targets? Working Paper, University of Michigan (School of Business). See further: Shakespeare C (2001), Accounting For Asset Securitizations: Complex Fair Values and Earnings Management, Working Paper, University of Michigan.

(26): Wooten v. Loshbough, 649 Fsupp 531 (N.D.Ind. 1986) (on reconsideration) 738 Fsupp 314 (affirmed) 951 F2d 768 (under Federal R.I.C.O. statutes, the stripping of a company’s ability to pay a Court-ordered judgment claim was a ’predicate act‘).

(27): See: Kulzick R (2004). Sarbanes-Oxley: Effects on Financial
Transparency, S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 69(1): 43-49.

(28): See: Albany Insurance v. Esses, 831 F2d 41 (CA2, 1987) (under Federal R.I.C.O. statutes, making false statements about the value of asset was a ‘predicate act’); Howell Hydrocarbons v. Adams, 897 F2d 183 (CA5 1990) (under Federal R.I.C.O. statutes, making a company look solvent when its not, constitutes a ‘predicate act’).

(29): See: Lockheed Martin v. Boeing, 357 Fsupp2d 1350 (M.D.Fla., 2005) (bidder violated competitor’s property rights to proprietary information by using it to produce winning bids).

(30): See: Colloff M (2005), The Rôle of the Trustee in Mitigating Fraud in Structured Financings, Journal of Structured Finance, 10(4):73-85. See further: Shakespeare C (2003), Do Managers Use Securitization Volume and Fair Value Estimates to Hit Earning Targets? Working Paper, University of Michigan (School of Business).

See: Shakespeare C (2001), Accounting For Asset Securitizations: Complex Fair Values and Earnings Management. Working Paper, University of Michigan. See: Katyal K (2003), Conspiracy Theory, The Yale Law Journal, 112(6):1307-1398.

See: Geary W (2002), The Legislative Recreation of R.I.C.O.: Reinforcing The ‘myth’ of Organized Crime, Crime, Law & Social Change, 38(4):311-315. See: Kulzick R (2004), Sarbanes-Oxley: Effects on Financial Transparency, S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 69(1): 43-49. See: Painter R (2004), Convergence and Competition In Rules Governing Lawyers and Auditors, The Journal of Corporation Law, 29(2):397-426. See: Jordans R. (2003), The legal approach to investment advisers in different jurisdictions, Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 11(2):169-171.

See: Blanque P. (2003), Crisis and Fraud, Journal of Financial Regulation & Compliance, 11(1):60-70. See: Pickholz M & Pickholz J (2001), Manipulation, Journal of Financial Crime, 9(2):117-133. See: Zey M(1999), The subsidiarization of the securities industry and the organization of securities fraud networks to return profits in the 1980s, Work and Occupations, 26(1):50-76.

See: Aicher R, Cotton D & Khan T (2004), Credit Enhancement: Letters of Credit, Guaranties, Insurance and Swaps, The Business Lawyer, 59(3):897-973. See: Brief T & Ms Sweeney T (2003), Corporate Criminal Liability, The American Criminal Review, 40(2): 337-366. See: Landrum D (2003), Governance of limited liability companies – Contrasting California and Delaware models, The Real Estate Finance Journal, 19(1).

(31): See: 18 USC 1961-1968.

(32): See: Alexander v. Thornbough, 713 FSupp 1271 (D.Minn. 1989) (appeal dismissed) 881 F2d 1081; Mira v. Nuclear Measurements Corp., 107 F3d 466 (CA7, 1997); US v. Manzella, 782 F2d 533 (CA5, 1986)(cert. Denied.) 476 US 1123; Cadle Co v. Flanagan, 271 Fsupp2d 379 (D.Conn., 2003); Seale v. Miller, 698 Fsupp 883 (N.D.G.A., 1988); Georgia Gulf Corp. v. Ward, 701 Fsupp 1556 (NDGA 1988); Wooten v. Loshbough, 649 FSupp. 531 (N.D.Ind. 1986) (on reconsideration) 738 Fsupp 314 (affirmed) 951 F2d 768 (stripping of company’s ability to pay judgment claim was ‘predicate act’ under R.I.C.O. statutes); Formax v. Hostert, 841 F2d 388 (CAFed, 1988); Abell v. Potomac Insurance, 858 F2d 1104 (CA5, 1988) (appeal after remand) 946 F2d 1160 (cert. denied) 492 US 918; Aetna Ca. Ins. Co. v. P & B Autobody, 43 F3d 1546 (CA1, 1994); Albany Insurance v. Esses, 831 F2d 41 (CA2, 1987) (making false statements about value of asset was a “predicate act”); Alfadda v. Fenn, 935 F2d 475 (CA2, 1991)(certiorari denied) 502 US 1005; Laird v. Integrated Resources, 897 F2d 826 (CA5, 1990); Shearin v. E F Hutton, 885 F2d 1162 (CA3, 1989); Bank One of Cleveland v. Abbe, 916 F2d 1067 (CA6, 1990); BancOklahoma Mortgage Corp. v. Capital Title Co., 194 F3d 1089 (CA10, 1999); Howell Hydrocarbons v. Adams, 897 F2d 183 (CA5 1990) (under Federal R.I.C.O. statutes, making a company look solvent when its not, constitutes a ‘predicate act’); Matter of Lewisville Properties, 849 F2d 946 (CA5, 1988) (false pretenses constitutes ‘predicate acts’).

See: Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Vigman, 908 F2d 1461 (CA9, 1990); International Data Bank v. Zepkin, 812 F2d 149 (CA4, 1987); Warner v. Alexander Grant & Co., 828 F2d 14528 (CA11, 1987); Mauriber v. Shearson/American Express, 546 FSupp 391 (SDNY, 1982); Farmers Bank F Delaware v. Bell Mortgage Corp., 452 FSupp 1278 (D.Del, 1978); Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., 719 F2d 5 (CA2, 1983); USACO Coal v. Carbomin Energy Inc., 689 F2d 94 (CA6, 1982); Binkley v. Shaeffer, 609 FSupp 601 (E.D.Pa., 1985); Sedima v. Imrex Co., 473 US 479 (1985) . See: Glanz M (1983). R.I.C.O. and Securities Fraud: A Workable Limitation, Columbia Law Review, 6:1513-1543. See: Masella J (1991), Standing to Sue In A Civil R.I.C.O. Suit Predicated On Violation OF SEC Rule 10b-5: The Purchase Or Sale Requirement, Columbia Law Review, 91(7):1793-1812. See: Coffey P (1990), The Selection, Analysis and Approval of Federal R.I.C.O. Prosecutions, Notre Dame Law Review, 65: 1035-1055. See: Matthews A (1990), Shifting The Burden of Losses In The Securities Markets: The Rôle of Civil R.I.C.O. In Securities Litigation, Notre Dame Law Review, 65: 896-906.

(33): See: Bradford National Clearing Corp. v. SEC, 590 F2d 1085 (DCCir, 1978); In Re Stock Exchanges Options Trading Antitrust Litigation, 317 F3d 134 (CA2, 2003); Gordon v. NYSE, 422 US 659 (1975); National Gerimedical Hospital v. Blue Cross of Kansas City, 452 US 378 (1981); Silver v. NYSE, 373 US 341 (1963) (no Antitrust immunity); Strobl v. NY Mercantile Exchange, 768 F2d 22.

(34), (35):
§ 1 Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1:

Trusts, etc., in restraint of trade illegal; penalty:

Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal. Every person who shall make any contract or engage in any combination or conspiracy hereby declared to be illegal shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding $10,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other person, $350,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding three years, or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the court.

§ 2 Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2:

Monopolizing trade a felony; penalty:

Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding $10,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other person, $350,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding three years, or by both said punishments, in discretion of the court.

§ 3 Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 3:

Trusts in Territories or District of Columbia illegal; combination a felony:

Every contract, combination in form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce in any Territory of the United States or of the District of Columbia, or in restraint of trade or commerce between any such Territory and another, or between any such Territory or Territories and any State or States or the District of Columbia (DC), or with foreign nations, or between the District of Columbia and any State or States or foreign nations, is declared illegal. Every person who shall make any such contract or engage in any such combination or conspiracy, shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding $10,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other person, $350,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding three years, or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the court.

3. CLAYTON ACT, 15 U.S.C. §§ 12-27, 29 U.S.C. §§ 52-53:

• § 1 Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 12 Definitions; short title:

§ 1 Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 12 Definitions; short title:
(a) “Antitrust laws”, as used herein, includes the Act entitled:
‘An Act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies’, approved July second, eighteen hundred and ninety; sections seventy-three to seventy-seven, inclusive, of an Act entitled ‘An Act to reduce taxation, to provide revenue for the Government, and for other purposes’, of August 27th, eighteen hundred and ninety-four; an Act entitled ‘An Act to amend sections seventy-three and seventy-six of the Act of August twenty-seventh, eighteen hundred and ninetyfour’, entitled ‘An Act to reduce taxation, to provide revenue for the Government, and for other purposes’, approved February twelfth, nineteen hundred and thirteen; and also this Act.

‘Commerce’, as used herein, means trade or commerce among the several States and with foreign nations, or between the District of Columbia or any Territory of the United States and any State, Territory, or foreign nation, or between any insular possessions or other places that are under the jurisdiction of the United States, or between any such possession or place and any US State or Territory of the United States or the District of Columbia or any foreign nation, or within the District of Columbia or any Territory or any insular possession or other place under the jurisdiction of the United States:

Provided, That nothing in this Act contained shall apply to the Philippine Islands. The word ‘person’ or ‘persons’ wherever used in this Act shall be deemed to include corporations and associations existing under or authorized by the laws of either the United States, the laws of any of the Territories, the laws of any State, or the laws of any foreign country.

(b) This Act may be cited as the “Clayton Act”.

• § 2 Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 13(2):

Discrimination in price, services, or facilities:

(a) Price; selection of customers:

It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, either directly or indirectly, to discriminate in price between different purchasers of commodities of like grade and quality, where either or any of the purchases involved in such discrimination are in commerce, where such commodities are sold for use, consumption, or resale within the United States or any Territory thereof or the District of Columbia or any insular possession or other place under the jurisdiction of the United States, and where the effect of such discrimination may be substantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce, or to injure, destroy, or prevent competition with any person who either grants or knowingly receives the benefit of such discrimination, or with customers of either of them: Provided, That nothing herein contained shall prevent differentials which make only due allowance for differences in the cost of manufacture, sale, or delivery resulting from the differing methods or quantities in which such commodities are to such purchasers sold or delivered:

Provided, however, That the Federal Trade Commission may, after due investigation and hearing to all interested parties, fix and establish quantity limits, and revise the same as it finds necessary, as to particular commodities or classes of commodities, where it finds that available purchasers in greater quantities are so few as to render differentials on account thereof unjustly discriminatory or promotive of monopoly in any line of commerce; and the foregoing shall then not be construed to permit differentials that are based on differences in quantities greater than those so fixed and established: and provided further, That nothing herein contained shall prevent persons engaged in selling goods, wares, or merchandise in commerce from selecting their own customers in bona fide transactions and not in restraint of trade: and provided further, That nothing herein contained shall prevent price changes from time to time where in response to changing conditions affecting the market for or the marketability of the goods concerned, such as but not limited to actual or imminent deterioration of perishable goods, obsolescence of seasonal goods, distress sales under court process, or sales in good faith in discontinuance of business in the goods concerned.

(b) Burden of rebutting prima-facie case of discrimination:

Upon proof being made, at any hearing on a complaint under this section, that there has been discrimination in price or services or facilities furnished, the burden of rebutting the prima-facie case thus made by showing justification shall be upon the person charged with a violation of this section, and unless justification shall be affirmatively shown, the Commission is authorized to issue an order terminating the discrimination: Provided, however, That nothing herein contained shall prevent a seller rebutting the prima-facie case thus made by showing that his lower price or the furnishing of services or facilities to any purchaser or purchasers was made in good faith to meet an equally low price of a competitor, or the services or facilities furnished by a competitor.

(c) Payment or acceptance of commission, brokerage, or other compensation: It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to pay or grant, or to receive or accept, anything of value as a commission, brokerage, or other compensation, or any allowance or discount in lieu thereof, except for services rendered in connection with the sale or purchase of goods, wares, or merchandise, either to the other party to such transaction or to an agent, representative, or other intermediary therein where such intermediary is acting in fact for or in behalf, or is subject to the direct or indirect control, of any party to such transaction other than the person by whom such compensation is so granted or paid.

(d) Payment for services or facilities for processing or sale:

It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce to pay or contract for the payment of anything of value to or for the benefit of a customer of such person in the course of such commerce as compensation or in consideration for any services or facilities furnished by or through such customer in connection with the processing, handling, sale, or offering for sale of any products or commodities manufactured, sold, or offered for sale by such person, unless such payment or consideration is available on proportionally equal terms to all other customers competing in the distribution of such products or commodities.

(e) Furnishing services or facilities for processing, handling, etc.: It shall be unlawful for any person to discriminate in favor of one purchaser against another purchaser or purchasers of a commodity bought for resale, with or without processing, by contracting to furnish or furnishing, or by contributing to the furnishing of, any services or facilities connected with the processing, handling, sale, or offering for sale of such commodity so purchased upon terms not accorded to all purchasers on proportionally equal terms.

(f) Knowingly inducing or receiving discriminatory price:
It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, knowingly to induce or receive a discrimination in price which is prohibited by this section. Discrimination in rebates, discounts, or advertising service charges; underselling in particular localities; penalties:

• 15 U.S.C. § 13a:

It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to be a party to, or assist in, any transaction of sale, or any contract to sell, which discriminates to his knowledge against competitors of the purchaser, in that, any discount, rebate, allowance, or advertising service charge is granted to the purchaser over and above any discount, rebate, allowance, or advertising service charge available at the time of such transaction to the said competitors in respect of a sale of goods of like grade, quality, and quantity; to sell, or to contract to sell, goods in any part of the United States at prices lower than those exacted by said person elsewhere in the United States for the purpose of destroying competition, or of eliminating a competitor in such part of the United States; or, to sell, or contract to sell, goods at unreasonably low prices for the purpose of destroying competition or eliminating a competitor.

• Any person violating any of the provisions of this section shall, upon conviction thereof, be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

• 15 U.S.C. § 13b:

Cooperative association; return of net earnings or surplus:
Nothing in sections 13 to 13b and 21a of this title shall prevent a cooperative association from returning to its members, producers, or consumers the whole, or any part of, the net earnings or surplus resulting from its trading operations, in proportion to their purchases or sales from, to, or through the association.

• § 3 Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 14:

Sale, etc., on agreement not to use goods of competitor:

It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to lease or make a sale or contract for sale of goods, wares, merchandise, machinery, supplies, or other commodities, whether patented or unpatented, for use, consumption, or resale within the United States or any Territory thereof or the District of Columbia or any insular possession or other place under the jurisdiction of the United States, or fix a price charged therefor, or discount from, or a rebate upon, such price, on the condition, agreement, or the understanding that the lessee or the purchaser thereof shall not use or deal in the goods, wares, merchandise, machinery, supplies, or other commodities of a competitor or competitors of the lessor or seller, where the effect of such lease, sale, or contract for sale or such condition, agreement, or understanding may be to substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce.

• FTC Regulations: Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act outlaw ”unfair methods of competition“ but do not define unfair. The Supreme Court has ruled that violations of the Sherman Act are also violations of Section 5, but Section 5 covers some practices that are beyond the scope of the Sherman Act. It is the FTC’s job to enforce Section 5.

(36): See: Eastman Kodak Co v. Image technical Services, 504 US 451 (1992); Jefferson parish Hospital v. Hyde, 466 US 2 (1984); Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, 395 US 100 (1969).

(37): See: Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp, 485 US 717 (1988); Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube, 467 US 752 (1984); Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp., 465 US 752 (1984); US v. Arnold, Schwin et al, 388 US 365 (1967); USPS v. Flamingo Industries, #02-1290 (2004); Brown v. Pro Football, 518 US 213 (1996); FTC v. Ticor Title Insurance Company, 504 US 621 (1992); Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. Indian head Inc., 486 US 492 (1988).

(38): See: Standard Oil Co v. US, 337 US 293 (1949); See: US v. Griffith, 334 US 100 (1948). See: Brooke Group Ltd. V. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, 509 US 209 (1993).

(39): See: Texaco v. Hasbrouck, 496 US 543 (1990); J Truet Payne Co v. Chrysler Motors, 451 US 557 (1981); Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 440 US 69 (1979); US v. United States Gypsum, 438 US 422 (1978); FTC v. Sun Oil Co., 371 US 505 (1963).

(40): See: Brooke Group Ltd. V. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, 509 US 209 (1993); Matsushita Electric v. Zenith Radio, 475 US 574 (1986); Utah Pie Co. v. Continental Baking Co. et al, 386 US 685 (1967).

(41): See: Parmenter v. FDIC, 925 F2d 1088 (CA8,1991); Ace-Federal Reporters v. Barram, 226 F3d 1329 (Ca.Fed., 2000)(on remand) 2002 WL 1292032; Workman v. UPS, 234 F3d 998 (CA7, 2000); Dibrell Brothers v. Banca Nazionale Del Lavoro, 383 F3d 1571 (CA11, 1999); Gibson v. Neighborhood Health Clinics, 121 F3d 1126 (CA7, 1997); Floss v. Ryans Family Steakhouses, 211 F3d 306 (CA6, 2000)(cert. denied) 531 US 1072; Heinig Furs, 811 Fsupp 1546 (M.D.Ala., 1993); Flanders Medeiros v. Bogosian, 88 Fsupp 412 (DRI, 1994)(affirmed in part) 65 F3d 198; Johnson Enterprises v. FPl Group, 162 F3d 1290 (CA2, 1998); Hoffman v. Bankers Trust, 925 Fsupp 315 (M.D.Pa, 1995); Prudential Insurance v. Sipula, 776 F2d 157 (CA7, 1985); In Re Sulakshma, 207 BR 422 (E.D.Pa, 1997).

(42): See: Gordon T (2000), Securitization of Executory Future Flows as bankruptcy-Remote True Sales, University of Chicago Law Review, 67:1317-1322.

(43): See: Valdiviezo v. Phelps Dodge, 995 Fsupp 1060 (D.Ariz., 1997). Johnson enterprises v. FPL Group, 162 F3d 1290 (CA2, 1998). Ryan v. Upchurch, 474 Fsupp 211 (SND, 1979)(reversed) 627 F2d 836. See: Rose J & Dawson P (Sept. 1997), Contingent Transfer: The Illusory Promise of Structured Finance. S&P Structured Finance, page 10.

(44): Prudential Insurance v. Sipula, 776 F2d 157 (CA7, 1985) (no consideration where party to contract could not bargain for alleged agreement).

(45): See: Tampa Pipeline Transport v. Chase Manhattan Service Corp., 928 Fsupp 1568 (MD.Fla., 1995) (affirmed) 87 F3d 1329.

(46): See: Imel v.Laborer’s Pension Fund Trust, 904 F2d 1327 (CA9, 1990) (cert. den.) 498 US 939 (contract should not alter statutory duties); Truck Ins. Exchange v. Ashland Oil, 951 F2d 787 (CA7, 1992); Cramer v. Consolidated Freightways, 255 F3d 806 (CA9, 2001) (cert. denied) 122 SCt 806; Lake James Community v. Burke County NC, 149 F3d 277 (CA4, 198) (cert. denied) 525 US 1106; Davis v. Parker, 58 F3d 183 (CA5, 1995); In Re NWFx, 881 F2d 530 (on rehearing) 904 F2d 469 (cert. denied) 498 US 941; Biomedical Systems v. GE Marquette, 287 F3d 707 (CA8, 2002) (cert. denied) 123 SCt 636 (post-contract formation failure to obtain statutorily required license invalidated agreement).

THE FOLLOWING DATA HAS BEEN PUBLISHED AT THE FOOT OF MOST OF THESE REPORTS FOR THE PAST THREE YEARS++. IT WAS COMPILED BY MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S..

• THEY ARE 100% CONSISTENT WITH THE FOREGOING ANALYSIS, AND VICE VERSA:

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

NOTICES:

BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time AMENDING AND INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE. In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

POLAND’S SUSPICIOUS SECOND KATYN MASSACRE TRAGEDY

cropped-chrisstory

25-YEAR-OLD TUPOLEV HAD BEEN ‘OVERHAULED’ IN RUSSIA MONTHS EARLIER

Sunday 11 April 2010 00:30

• UPDATE: OUR SUSPICIONS ARE YET FURTHER STRENGTHENED:
Since we posted this report, we have learned as follows:

(1): President Mikheil Saakashvili of Georgia has stated on a CNN interview that quote ‘something incredibly evil was involved here’ without elaborating or explaining what he was implying. The interview can be seen at this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycj2CCkDx3s

(2): A close examination of the precise terrain WEST of the Smolensk-Severnyi military airport reveals that for an extended area, the terrain is DISTINCTLY LOWER than the airport itself, which is situated on a sort of plateau. The area to the WEST of the military airport is between 100 and 150 feet BELOW the plateau. In THAT case, the plane COULD NOT HAVE SCRAPED THE TOPS OF TREES, unless the trees were about 400 feet high.

(3): The investigation is being carried out under the supervision of Prime Minister Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, a senior GRU (Soviet Military Intelligence) Officer. Since any preplanned sabotage would precisely have been organised by the GRU, the investigation has of course been placed in the hands of the perpetrators, which is standard practice in these cover-up operations, in both the covert Soviet Union and the United States: in case you didn’t know.

(4): An article in The Guardian cites a Polish MP who attended the memorial gathering in the Katyn forests, having travelled there by train, who claims that at the time of the alleged ‘accident’, which occurred just before 11:00 a.m., there were blue skies* over Katyn, which is located about ten miles from the crash site. The Polish MP’s remark is found at the end of the article: here’s the link:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/apr/11/poland-president-plane-crash-kaczynski

• See also the following article in the Daily Mail:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1265482/Leck-Kaczynski-Russia-engineered-plane-crash-claims-Polish-MP.html#ixzz0l07Zpee3

(5): We have had one violently indignant reaction from a Pole who protests too much. Without attaching overmuch importance to this, we suggest that it may imply NERVOUSNESS THAT THE COVER-UP ‘LINE’ IS FULL OF HOLES. It’s news to us that trees grow 400 feet tall in that region.

(6): An Italian source, informazionescorretta.blogspot.com, reported on 14th April as follows:
• Three Russian boys heard and saw an explosion before the crash.

• Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk had already decided to devalue to zloty, contrary to the unwritten and arrogant rule that currencies adjacent to the Eurozone and in competition with the Euro cannot be devalued without the kind permission of Berlin, Paris and Frankfurt.

• At least five of the Polish Ministers who were killed were being investigated for corruption.

• The Military chiefs on the aircraft were mainly overt Communist-era holdovers. They were resisting international pressures and were about to be compelled to resign.

• An aircraft crammed with Polish journalists landed just 40 minutes after the crash, and went straight to Katyn, as though nothing had happened.

(7): The pilot is reported by Polish sources to have been struggling with defective altimeter and airspeed indicators. There are reports that radar revealed that the plane was only 10 metres off the ground, which is inconsistent with the treetop story. It should be noted that a favourite DVD crash stratagem is to fiddle PRECISELY with the altimeter and speed indicators. This is in fact a known hallmark of a DVD OPERATION, raising suspicions of collaboration by foreign intelligence or even of a METABRIDGE OP. (Mossad-CIA-MI-6-DVD), as the Poles had snubbed the IMF over Greece.

* We had blue skies for days here in Buckinghamshire, so this of course makes sense.

• AIRCRASH HAS ALL THE HALLMARKS OF A ‘PREPLANNED ACCIDENT’

• THE KEY FIGURES IDENTIFIED AMONG THE CASUALTIES

• ALL POLAND’S TOP PEOPLE WIPED OUT IN ONE HIT

• SUSPICIOUS TIMING AND OVERHAUL THE OLD SOVIET TU-154

• LONG ARM OF RUSSIA’S CLENCHED FIST DEPLOYED

• NOTE: Because of the Second Katyn massacre, we initially had to ‘interrupt’ display of the report entitled ‘ALL UK LEGISLATION PASSED SINCE 2000 IS NULL AND VOID’, posted on 10th April 2010. We have now restored that report as the main display, with a very important UPDATE.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

SECURITIZATION IS ILLEGAL UPDATE: In the Subs/Books Update panel immediately below the NEWS panel that you are currently viewing, you will see an announcement concerning publication of Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 7 & 8. If you press that announcement text and open up the panel, you will see the contents list for the new [2010Q1] issue of E.I.R., including a breakdown of the Chapter Headings for the detailed analysis showing that Securitization is illegal. See our NEWS report dated 10th March 2010 for summaries of some of the data from this analysis. We understand that the report has created uproar in certain corridors of corrupt power.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• AS PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED, OUR LANDLINES REMAIN CLOSED BECAUSE OF UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT. WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL OR THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

AIRCRASH HAS ALL THE HALLMARKS OF A ‘PREPLANNED ACCIDENT’
It is most unlikely that the fatal crash shortly before 11:00 a.m. on 10th April of a Polish Government Tupolev Tu-154 aircraft near the Smolensk-Severnyi military airport, was an accident. It looked just like an accident, given that the airplane sliced treetops on its fourth attempt to land in heavy fog, disintegrating about one mile from the airport. There had been ‘suggestions’ that the plane should divert to Minsk. There were no survivors.

The 60-year-old President of Poland, Lech Kaczynski, was leading a delegation of highest-level Polish officials to attend memorial ceremonies at Katyn, the site of the massacre of 22,000 Poles by Soviet terrorist operatives 70 years ago.

As a consequence of that massacre in 1940 et seq., all possible sources of subsequent resistance to Soviet control in Poland were liquidated in one operation.

The casualty list of those who perished in the Tupolev Tu-154 crash on Saturday implies that Polish sources of problems considered to be intractable by Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin (Shalomov), of Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU), and Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachëv (KGB-FSB-covert Party) from his administrative wing inside the Kremlin complex, have likewise been liquidated in what can be considered to be ‘the second Katyn Massacre’.

THE KEY FIGURES IDENTIFIED AMONG THE CASUALTIES
Among the dead were the following:

• Blasik, Andrzej, Chief of the Polish Air Force.
• Bochenek, Krystyna, Deputy Speaker of the Polish Senate.
• Chodakowski, Archbishop Miron, Orthodox Ordinary of the Polish Army.
• Deptula, Leszek, Member of the Sejm (Lower House of Parliament).
• Dolniak, Grzegorz, Member of the Sejm.
• Fetlinska, Janina, Member of the Polish Senate.
• Gagor, General Franciszek, Chief of the Polish Army General Staff.
• Gesicka, Grazyna, Member of the Sejm.
• Gosiewski, Przemyslaw, Member of the Sejm.
• Handzlik, Mariusz, Undersecretary of State in President’s Office.
• Jaruga-Nowacka, Izabela, Member of the Sejm.
• Karpiniuk, Sebastian, Member of the Sejm.
• Karweta, Vice Admiral Andrzej, Commander-in-Chief of the Polish Navy.
• Kaczynski, Lech, President of the Republic of Poland.
• Kaczynski, Mrs, wife of the President of the Republic.
• Kochanowski, Janusz, Polish Ombudsman for Citizen Rights.
• Kremer, Andrzej, Polish Deputy Foreign Minister.
• Kurtyka, Janusz, Historian and President of the Institute of National Remembrance.
• Natalli-Swiat, Aleksandra, Member of the Sejm.
• Nurowski, Piotr, President of the Polish Olympic Committee.
• Plazynski, Maciej, President of the Polish Community Association.
• Ploski, Tadeusz, Bishop of the Military Ordinariate of the Polish Army.
• Przewoznik, Andrzej, Secretary-General, Council for Protection of Struggle and Martyrdom Sites.
• Putra, Krzysztof, Deputy Speaker of the Sejm.
• Rumianek, Ryszard, Rector of the Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University.
• Rybicki, Arkadiusz, Member of the Sejm.
• Skrzypek, Slawomir, President of the National Bank of Poland.
• Stasiak, Wladyslaw, Chief of the Office of the President of the Republic of Poland.
• Szczyglo, Aleksander, Head of the National Security Bureau.
• Szmajdzinski, Jerzy, Deputy Speaker of the Sejm.
• Szymanek-Deresz, Jolanta, Member of the Sejm.
• Walentynowicz, Anna, free trade union activist, member of Solidarity (Solidarity heroine).
• Wassermann, Zbigniew, Member of the Sejm.
• Woda, Wieslaw, Member of the Sejm.
• Wojtas, Edward, Member of the Sejm.
• Wypych, Pawel, Secretary of State in the Office of the President of the Republic of Poland.
• Zajac, Stanislaw, Member of the Senate
… and several other Members of the Sejm.

ALL POLAND’S TOP PEOPLE WIPED OUT IN ONE HIT
To recapitulate, Poland lost, in addition to the President of the Polish Republic and his wife:

• The Chief of the Polish Air Force.
• The Chief of the Polish Army General Staff.
• The Commander-in-chief of the Polish Navy.
= ALL THE MILITARY SERVICE CHIEFS.

• The head of Polish Intelligence (National Security Bureau).

• The three top officials inside the Office of the President of the Republic.

• The Governor of the National Bank of Poland.

• The Deputy Foreign Minister of Poland.

SUSPICIOUS TIMING AND OVERHAUL THE OLD SOVIET TU-154
Moreover the timing of this ‘planned accident’ is highly suspicious. For starters, the 25-year-old aircraft had undergone a complete overhaul at a factory in southern Russia late last year, being delivered to the Polish authorities in December 2009.

This makes a planned malfunction likely, especially given that the Katyn massacre ceremony, to be held 70 years after the atrocity, was of course ‘known in advance’.

Issues contemporaneous with this catastrophe include:

• Most conspicuously, the peak level of intergovernmental tensions surrounding the disposition and settlement of diverted and stolen funds, given not least that Poland was exploited during the Bush II Administration, when the US Ambassador to Poland was a known George W. Bush crony (to go into no further details here) and Polish institutions were flooded with the proceeds of illicit off-balance sheet trades leveraged off diverted and stolen funds.

• The projected use of the Polish Army’s Ustka-Wicko base as a possible site for US missile interceptors. Russia objected strongly and suspended participation in the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

• Contracts for Western aircraft.

LONG ARM OF RUSSIA’S CLENCHED FIST DEPLOYED
Historically, when Poland tries to align itself with the West, Russia has deployed the long arm of its clenched fist – starting with the Katyn massacre of thousands of Polish officers and key political leaders, so that come the Russian occupation, there was minimal opposition from Poles trying to defend their freedom.

In 1943, Polish General Sikorski’s plane crashed, and the General was killed, off Gibraltar, around the time of the Tehran Conference that set the scene for the catastrophic Yalta Conference, which consigned Poland to Soviet control after the war.

And exiled Polish leaders who returned home after the war were ‘tried’ and executed in the late 1940s and early 1950s by the Soviets and by their Polish puppet Communist governments.

Similar peculiarities were noted elsewhere in Eastern Europe: for instance, the Czech President suddenly ‘committed suicide’ in 1948 by jumping off a balcony immediately ahead of free elections which never happened.

Now we have the instant liquidation, in one operation, of the Polish President and his wife, the chiefs of the three Polish military services, the Polish Intelligence Chief, the three top officials from the late Polish President’s Office (who knew everything), and the Governor of the National Bank of Poland – killed in an old Soviet aircraft which had undergone a ‘complete overhaul’ in a southern Russian factory only four months earlier.

The German DVD ‘Black agency’ is known for its expertise in fiddling with aircraft controls to procure delayed crashes. It is a ‘talent’ shared with its secret allies, the covert Soviet GRU-KGB.

Key signatories required for crucial contemporaneous financial undertakings would of course have been those of the President and the Governor of the National Bank of Poland.

No wonder the Russian President, Dmitry Medvedev (Menakhem Aaronovich Mendel’) appointed GRU-Prime Minister Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin (Shalomov) to head a commission to ‘investigate’ the crash – despatching the Russian Minister for Emergency Situations, the well-known ‘former’ Communist apparatchik Sergei Shoigu, to the crash site.

• Any evidence of pre-planned delayed sabotage will need to have been identified and removed from the scene smartish.

NOTICES:
Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

ALL UK LEGISLATION PASSED SINCE 2000 IS NULL AND VOID

cropped-chrisstory

IMPLICATIONS OF MISMANAGEMENT OF ‘REFORM’ OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS

Saturday 10 April 2010 01:01

• We REPOSTED this report on 21st April for some hours. As a consequence, the links to the report DOUBLED OVERNIGHT, to 7,040. Our monitoring of the links to this report has revealed massive ongoing interference. The highly revealing data on this score have now been repositioned at the foot of this report. You’ll see that the report basically ‘went viral’, and that Google has had great difficulty controlling it. The doubling of the links overnight speaks for itself.

• Please also note that THIS IS THE ORIGINAL REPORT ON THIS SUBJECT.

UPDATE: BRITAIN FACES A COLOSSAL CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS
Now that the deception over the Hereditary Peers’ Letters Patent has been placed decisively in the public domain [see below] THE CRISIS CAN NO LONGER BE GLOSSED OVER AND IGNORED.

• That’s what they will try to do, but they can’t.

Here are the issues that the UK Political and Bureaucratic Establishment face which PRECLUDE the usual cynical official procedure of pretending there’s no problem here:

• The nation will have to be told that TEN YEARS’ WORTH OF LAWS don’t exist in reality, only on paper, and that all legislation since 2000 is NULL AND VOID.

The European Union Collective will have to be informed that none of the legislation that it has inflicted on the Westminster Parliament since 2000 is valid, the whole lot being NULL AND VOID*.

• The Privy Council, the Lord President of the Council (Lord Mandelson!), the Lord Privy Seal (Harriet Harman QC, MP!), an office combined with the office of Leader of the House of Commons, and whoever else advises The Queen as Head of State, will HAVE to grasp this nettle and inform Her Majesty that all the Bills she has signed since 2000 are NULL AND VOID.

• All foreign and Commonwealth Governments will have to receive a Diplomatic Note from Her Majesty’s Government to the same effect. THIS CANNOT BE DELAYED, or there will be serious consequences arising from thorny UK legislative issues affecting governments abroad.

• The Hereditary Peers will have to petition The Queen EN MASSE for Her Majesty to intervene to enable the Hereditary Peers’ reinstatement to the House of Lords and the return of their Letters Patent. If the Government have taken custody of the Letters Patent of Hereditary Peers whose Letters Patent were granted centuries ago, that is another scandal.

• NO FURTHER LEGISLATION CAN BE PASSED BY PARLIAMENT until this mess has been sorted. Not now that the whole world knows about this unconstitutional, unlawful and illegal state of affairs.

• If the usual British official modus operandi of IGNORING THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM and pretending that the problem doesn’t exist is adopted, there will be very serious accumulating, ongoing consequences for ALL ELEMENTS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL SETTLEMENT, and the situation could run completely out of control before the Establishment has had breakfast.

* When informing Brussels that the past ten years’ worth of Westminster legislation is VOID, the opportunity should be taken to add that remittance of taxpayers’ funds into the hands of a criminal enterprise is illegal (as we have proved), according to the UK Serious Fraud Office.

The European Commission’s accounts have not been approved by the EU’s own Court of Auditors in Luxembourg for the past FOURTEEN YEARS, which reveals that the European Commission is operating UNLAWFULLY AND ILLEGALLY, and thus that the British Government is committing an ongoing CRIMINAL OFFENCE by remitting the proceeds of its VAT collections to Brussels. UK VAT taxpayers may have a case against the Government for illegally diverting their VAT tax remittances.

It ALSO means that the Member Governments can sue the European Commission for the RETURN OF THEIR UNLAWFULLY REMITTED VALUE ADDED TAX PAYMENTS plus compound interest going back for fourteen years, as the European Commission is criminally retaining their taxpayers’ funds remitted by the Member Governments in error.

• As we recommended last autumn, and previously, British VAT accruals should be placed into a special Treasury account, to be offset against the colossal Government deficit and to pay down the permissive debt incurred by the discredited Labour Government.

• It is ANOTHER SCANDAL OF IMMENSE PROPORTIONS that the British Government sees fit to commit the crime of remitting its taxpayers’ funds into the hands of a criminal enterprise when the country is all but bankrupt thanks to the Government’s stupidity and profligacy, when the accruals in question CAN LEGITIMATELY BE DIVERTED INTO OFFSETTING THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE GOVERNMENT’S SPENDTHRIFT BEHAVIOUR.

• That would CUT SHORT THE DISHONEST ELECTION CAMPAIGN NON-DEBATE about how the deficit and the colossal volume of unnecessary new official debt are going to be addressed.

All in all, therefore, we have the ingredients of an IMMENSE CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS right across the political-financial spectrum. IGNORING THIS WILL HAVE FATAL CONSEQUENCES.

• SUBVERSIVE PLAN TO IMPOSE FIXED-TERM PARLIAMENTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM

• ‘CONSERVATIVE’ LEADER DAVID CAMERON BACKS THIS WHEEZE, TOO

• MONARCH’S KEY RESIDUAL POWER IS TO CALL FOR
A SUITABLE CANDIDATE TO FORM A GOVERNMENT

• ALL LEGISLATION PASSED BY THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT SINCE 2000 IS NULL AND VOID

• HEREDITARY PEERS NOT REMOVABLE BY GENERAL LEGISLATION

• AUTHORITY FOR THIS STATEMENT ISSUED BY THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT ITSELF

• ANALYSIS OF BARONESS ASHTON’S LORDS STATEMENT

• 900 HEREDITARY PEER-SPECIFIC BILLS WOULD BE NEEDED

• BOTCHED OBFUSCATION OF BLAIR’S HAM-FISTED MISCALCULATION

• THE UNLAWFUL REMOVAL OF PEERS’ PASSES TO THE LORDS

• RECAPITULATION OF THE ANALYSIS TO THIS POINT

• HOUSE OF LORDS WAS THEN PACKED WITH BLAIR’S CRONIES

• DEFINITIVE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS BOTCHED REVOLUTIONARY OPERATION

• HOW THIS CHAOTIC STATE OF AFFAIRS CAN BE RECTIFIED WITH MINIMAL HASSLE

• WHY THE REVOLUTIONARIES HAVE SHOT THEMSELVES IN THE FOOT

• POSTSCRIPT: NOTHING THE NEW PARLIAMENT PASSES WILL BE VALID, EITHER

• ‘SCUM OF THE EARTH’, ‘TOO CLEVER BY HALF’

• WITHOUT ABOLITION OF THE 1999 ACT, THE GENERAL ELECTION IS POINTLESS

• Reiminder: The report dated 11th April 2010 entitled ‘POLAND’S SUSPICIOUS SECOND KATYN MASSACRE TRAGEDY’ can be accessed at once by pressing ‘Archive’ or the Archive button.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

SECURITIZATION IS ILLEGAL UPDATE: In the Subs/Books Update panel immediately below the NEWS panel that you are currently viewing, you will see an announcement concerning publication of Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 7 & 8. If you press that announcement text and open up the panel, you will see the contents list for the new [2010Q1] issue of E.I.R., including a breakdown of the Chapter Headings for the detailed analysis showing that Securitization is illegal. See our NEWS report dated 10th March 2010 for summaries of some of the data from this analysis. We understand that the report has created uproar in certain corridors of corrupt power.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• AS PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED, OUR LANDLINES REMAIN CLOSED BECAUSE OF UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT. WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL OR THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

SUBVERSIVE PLAN TO IMPOSE FIXED-TERM PARLIAMENTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
Having successfully degraded Britain’s public finances and its currency, first by years of inordinate socialist public spending and then by burdening all future generations with unconscionable public debt obligations because he didn’t like the sight of Argentine-style queues of customers lining the streets to withdraw their savings from the corrupt Northern Rock bank, the international socialist British Prime Minister Gordon Brown is secretly continuing the subversive operation launched by his corrupt predecessor, Tony Blair, to destroy the Monarchy and to convert Britain into a Republic.

Mounting evidence that the revolutionary UK Labour Government seeks the destruction of the Monarchy was confirmed on 8th April, when Brown stated, at the outset of the General Election campaign, that he will introduce fixed-term Parliaments and a referendum on the reform of the British first-past-the-post voting system if Labour is re-elected on 6th May.

In announcing an intention to impose fixed-term Parliaments, Brown is clearly accommodating the Campaign for Fixed-Term Parliaments – an innocuous-sounding but in fact thoroughly subversive, revolutionary so-called ‘cross-party’ initiative that has been campaigning behind the scenes to persuade gormless politicians whose brains reside mainly in their boots that the Prime Minister’s power to call for an election at the time of his choosing is by some alchemy an anti-democratic constitutional anachronism, and should be replaced by a fixed term of four or five years.

• Any such ‘reform’ would be consistent with, and would pressupose, the conversion of Britain into a chaotic Republic like the worst extant contemporary example, the United States: see why, below.

• Another clue here is that nobility (and ‘fake’ nobility, such as is represented by Blair’s cronies in the House of Lords) is incompatible with any Republican form of Government. [The original 13th Amendment to the US Constitution, drafted around 1800, banned Titles, Nobles and Esquires, and barred such title-holders from being US citizens and therefore from holding high office, a state of affairs that triggered the War of 1812 with Britain, leading to the sacking of Washington in 1814; whereupon the 13th Amendment was quietly dropped, with the assumption being that it was not ratified. However in recent years, state-by-state archival research has proved that it WAS ratified].

‘CONSERVATIVE’ LEADER DAVID CAMERON BACKS THIS WHEEZE, TOO
On 26th May 2009, the ‘Conservative’ David Cameron – front man for the alternative intelligence-promoted (Notting Hill) clique that has been readied, US-style, to replace the intelligence-promoted (Islington) claque headed by Blair and Brown from the 1990s if the forthcoming election cannot be adequately rigged to ensure a Brown victory – indicated that he is stupid enough to have fallen for this ruse, as well, when he pronounced that ‘a Conservative Government will seriously consider the option of fixed-term Parliaments when there is a majority Government’.

MONARCH’S KEY RESIDUAL POWER IS TO CALL FOR
A SUITABLE CANDIDATE TO FORM A GOVERNMENT
Why does this stance threaten the Monarchy? Answer: because one of the British Monarch’s residual OVERT powers consists in her power to consent to a Prime Minister’s request for a dissolution of Parliament, and her power also, on advice, to call for the elected parliamentary leader most likely to be in a position to form a Government, in the event of uncertainty – powers that may need to be deployed if the outcome of this General Election turns out to be as indecisive as many observers think is extremely likely.

And why can we state without fear of contradiction that the Campaign for Fixed-Term Parliaments is a subversive operation which has as its ultimate objective the overthrow of the Monarchy?

Because this tinkering with the UK Constitution needs to be seen in the context that it follows the Labour Government’s wholly unconstitutional, illegal and unlawful semi-destruction of the House of Lords – which can clearly be viewed as part of the same operation, as will now be demonstrated.

ALL LEGISLATION PASSED BY THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT SINCE 2000 IS NULL AND VOID
Investigations into this dimension of the secret revolutionary plan to destroy the Monarchy – which stands in the way of covertly antagonistic foreign powers’ hegemony strategies – and to convert Britain into a Republic, have yielded the remarkable finding that ALL LEGISLATION PASSED BY THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT SINCE ABOUT 2000 HAS BEEN NULL AND VOID.

• There are NO exceptions, contrary to assertions from some quarters that Finance Bills are not captured by this crisis. Rubbish! ALL Westminster legislation since 2000, INCLUDING all the rubber-stamping of legislation shovelled at us from Brussels, is NULL AND VOID, as explained below.

• PLUS: ALL LEGAL ACTIONS BASED ON LAWS PASSED AT WESTMINSTER SINCE 2000 FALL TO THE GROUND BECAUSE THOSE LAWS ARE BASED ON FRAUDULENT, RIGGED PROCEDURES.

Here’s how this definitive conclusion is reached: bear with us as we step through the evidence as deftly as possible, without omitting any of the necessary simple steps here:

HEREDITARY PEERS NOT REMOVABLE BY GENERAL LEGISLATION
Membership of the House of Lords is dependent upon the issuance, on ennoblement, by officials directly serving the Monarchy, of Letters Patent.

Removal of a Peer of the Realm from his seat in the House of Lords cannot be procured by General Legislation, such as the Blair Government’s House of Lords Act 1999.

This piece of General Legislation did NOT empower Her Majesty’s Government to impede a single Hereditary Peer who had taken his or her seat in the House of Lords after having sworn the Oath of Allegiance to the Crown, from continuing to carry out their solemn duties in the House of Lords as Councillors to the Crown, in accordance with the British Constitution.

AUTHORITY FOR THIS STATEMENT ISSUED BY THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT ITSELF
Please do not argue with this.

The authority for this statement comes from the Labour Government itself:

29 September 2008 : Column WA398:

House of Lords: Letters Patent
Lord Laird asked Her Majesty’s Government:
By what means Letters Patent creating peerages can be changed;
and in what legislation that has occurred. [HL5196]:

The Lord President of the Council (Baroness Ashton of Upholland):

The effect of Letters Patent creating peerages can be changed by legislation which has that specific effect. It cannot be changed by legislation of general application.

Thus, the Peerage Act 1963 allowed Peeresses in their own right to sit in the House of Lords regardless of the terms of any Letters Patent creating the peerage. The House of Lords Act 1999 removed the right of anyone to sit in the House by virtue of a hereditary peerage unless they were specifically excepted from the provisions. Conversely, the House of Lords decided in 1922 in the case of Viscountess Rhondda that the terms of the Sex Disqualification (Removal) Act 1919 were not sufficiently specific to allow her to take her seat in the Lords when her Letters Patent allowed her to inherit the peerage, but not the seat in the Lords. I am aware of only one case in which the effect of individual Letters Patent has been changed by Act of Parliament, which is that of the
Duke of Marlborough in 1706.

ANALYSIS OF BARONESS ASHTON’S LORDS STATEMENT
The first two sentences here are crucial:

‘The effect of Letters Patent creating peerages can be changed by legislation which has that specific effect. It cannot be changed by legislation of general application’.

Having taken their Oath of Allegiance to the Crown, some 900 Hereditary Peers (with the exception of a specified rump group of 92 hereditary peers) had the ‘effect’ of their Letters Patent ostensibly annulled by The House of Lords Act 1999, which was GENERAL LEGISLATION.

However, as Baroness Ashton told the House of Lords on 20th September 2008: ‘The effect… cannot be changed by legislation of general application’.

In standard double-minded fashion, Baroness Ashton then told the Lords that:

‘The House of Lords Act 1999 removed the right of anyone to sit in the House by virtue of a hereditary peerage unless they were specifically excepted from the provisions’.

900 HEREDITARY PEER-SPECIFIC BILLS WOULD BE NEEDED
But since The House of Lords Act 1999 was GENERAL LEGISLATION, the ‘right’ in question, part of the ‘effect’ specified at the beginning of Baroness Ashton’s pronouncement, removed that right illegally, unlawfully and unconstitutionally. Because:

• In order for ‘the effect of Letters Patent’ to be modified, given that it cannot be modified by General Legislation, it is necessary for:

• 900 PEER-SPECIFIC BILLS TO BE PASSED BY PARLIAMENT changing ‘the effect of Letters Patent’, as per Baroness Ashton’s opening sentences:

‘The effect of Letters Patent creating peerages can be changed by legislation which has that specific effect. It cannot be changed by legislation of general application’.

BOTCHED OBFUSCATION OF BLAIR’S HAM-FISTED MISCALCULATION
At some stage early in this process after passage of the 1999 legislation, the Blair Government realised that it had messed up and had browbeaten The Queen to append her signature to an UNCONSTITUTIONAL, UNLAWFUL BILL, with all the hazards associated with such a miscalculation.

So, in order to OBFUSCATE the situation and to smother any ‘untoward consequences’ from the subversive Blair Government’s perspective, Ministers embarked upon two subsidiary underhand, surreptitious, unconstitutional operations:

• First, we are informed that the Labour Government somehow managed to persuade most of the hereditary peers to hand over their Letters Patent to some Government Department (from which extracting the documents will of course be impossible) – notwithstanding that the Letters Patent remain the property of each Hereditary Peer to this day.

• Secondly, immediately after The House of Lords Act 1999 had received the Royal Assent, those hereditary peers whose names were not included among the rump of hereditary peers who were still ‘allowed’ to continue carrying out their duties as Councillors to the Crown, had their passes removed from them, so that they were thereby prevented from gaining access to the Chamber.

• The main traitor in this scandal was the ‘Conservative’ Peer Lord Cranborne, then the leader of the Conservative Party in the House of Lords, who perpetrated this tawdry ‘deal’ with the corrupt Blair behind the backs of the leaders of the Conservative Party.

THE UNLAWFUL REMOVAL OF PEERS’ PASSES TO THE LORDS
The scandalous removal of the hereditary peers’ passes came to light in 2008 when an Hereditary Peer requested a pass so that he could present his Letters Patent, take his oath of Allegiance to the Crown and thereby take his seat in the House of Lords.

When he discovered that the House of Lords authorities would not issue a pass enabling him to gain access to the Chamber, Lord Mereworth wrote as follows to The Lord President of the Council, the responsible official concerned:

The Lord President of the Council
The House of Lords,
Westminster,
London SW1A 0PW
By First Class Special Delivery
22nd June 2009

Dear Lord President,
Please accept the following as a token of esteem. Set out below is the published written question asked by Lord Laird of Artivargan and the written response given by your predecessor Baroness Ashton of Upholland on behalf of Her Majesty’s Government on 29th September 2008.

[see above: Editor].

Given the answer, it is clear that the hereditary peers’ Letters Patent were not amended by the House of Lords Act 1999 owing to the fact that the said Act is a piece of legislation for general application. Your predecessor’s answer put beyond doubt that my peerage and connections with the House of Lords do meet the requirements for a pass to be issued to me forthwith.

I enclose a copy of my letter dated 24th April 2009 to Sir Michael Wilcox KCB, the then Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod, requesting him to renew my pass to the House before it expired at the end of April 2009 [not shown here: Editor].

I felt sorry for Sir Freddie Viggers, the current Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod, [who is] clearly a dignified man of honour, who would not have demeaned himself by signing the letter on 17th June in response to my letter of 24th April unless he had been ordered to do so.

The response was as follows:-

‘I have looked into the renewal of your House of Lords pass and I have discussed this with the Lord Speaker, the usual channels and the Clerk of the Parliaments. I must inform you that it will not be possible to agree your request. Your peerage and connections with this House do not meet the requirements for a pass to be issued, and I am not able to issue a waiver.

I enclose a copy of the said letter. In light of the above and bearing in mind that I have had to wait two months for a totally incorrect and an extremely embarrassing response, I hope you will upon receipt of this letter acknowledge it by return and confirm that you have instructed Sir Freddie Viggers, to issue me with a House of Lords pass within seven days of the date of this letter.

Yours faithfully, Lord Mereworth.

RECAPITULATION OF THE ANALYSIS TO THIS POINT:

(1): The hereditary peers’ Letters Patent were not amended by the House of Lords Act 1999 owing to the fact that the said Act is a piece of legislation for general application.

(2): The withdrawal of the hereditary peers’ passes to enable them to enter the Chamber and so to fulfill their duties as Councillors to the Monarch is therefore unconstitutional, illegal and unlawful.

(3): The consequent destabilisation and variation of the membership composition of the House of Lords is likewise unconstitutional, illegal and unlawful.

(4): The consequence that most hereditary peers are unable in practice to exercise their duties as Councillors to the Crown further represents an unconstitutional, illegal and unlawful deprivation of their rights (and also, let it be added, of their human rights) to serve the Monarch in accordance with their Oath of Allegiance and consequent duties to the Crown.

HOUSE OF LORDS WAS THEN PACKED WITH BLAIR’S CRONIES
Having thrown the constitutional furniture around the room in this barbaric and wanton fashion, the Blair-Brown Revolutionary Government then packed the Upper House with their own cronies, for whom Letters Patent were issued in spades. This behaviour encapsulated the following ironies:

• Having started this destructive revolutionary process, the revolutionary socialists led by the corrupt opportunist criminal Blair and the hardened international socialist Brown then lost their bottle and decided that THEY quite fancied joining the élite themselves one day – making it possible for themselves and their cronies to become Lords and Ladies of the Realm.

In other words, their egos got the better of their sterile ideological preoccupations.

• Having thus abused the Letters Patent system in the manner described above, they accordingly proceeded to abuse it further by issuing new Letters Patent to a bunch of preferred and randomly selected hacks, thereby, contrary to law, discriminating against the Hereditary Peers who retained every right to sit in the Chamber and perform their serious duties as Councillors to The Queen.

[see above].

DEFINITIVE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS BOTCHED REVOLUTIONARY OPERATION
So, what are the consequences of this incredible state of affairs?

Why, as stated above, it means that:

• Every piece of legislation passed by the British Parliament since 2000 IS 100% NULL AND VOID because it was passed though an improperly constituted House of Lords which therefore lacked the power to approve any legislation for sending down to the House of Commons at all.

• Included within the UK legislation which is therefore null and void is the legislation approving the Lisbon Treaty – to which, therefore, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is NOT BOUND and can fully disregard and disavow, for this reason alone.

• Also included within the bogus legislation is the toxic public debt arising from the reckless bail-out ‘Statutes’ enacted in order to rescue Gordon Brown from being sunk without trace due to the media images of long street lines of Northern Rock customers pulling their savings. These ‘laws’, which bind/enslave future generations ad infinitum ARE VACATED, given this state of affairs.

HOW THIS CHAOTIC STATE OF AFFAIRS CAN BE RECTIFIED WITH MINIMAL HASSLE
If the incoming British Government wants to ensure that its future legislation is legitimate, and that it has any purpose at all, it has two alternatives to rectify this chaotic state of affairs:

•EITHER it must table about 900 separate Bills specific to each Hereditary Peer of the Realm and must have these Bills passed by Parliament individually, so that, in the words of Baroness Ashton of Upholland: ‘The effect of Letters Patent creating peerages can he changed by legislation which has that specific effect’. This would have to be done AT ONCE, before passing any other laws.

• OR: On taking power, it must immediately introduce legislation to ABOLISH The House of Lords Act 1999, thereby ‘restoring’ the said unlawfully, unconstitutionally and illegally removed rights and duties of the Hereditary Peers to enable them to perform their duties as Councillors to the Crown as per their Oaths of Allegiance to the British Monarch. (This would NOT render legitimate all the laws published since 2000, which will remain unconstitutional, unlawful and illegal indefinitely).

• If the second, sensible clean-up option is chosen, the Bill to ABOLISH The House of Lords Act 1999 MUST be the FIRST piece of legislation to be introduced: because any legislation introduced into Parliament absent such a Bill to ABOLISH the 1999 Act will be a complete waste of time and resources, as it cannot be lawful under these circumstances. (This would NOT render legitimate all the laws published since 2000, which will remain unconstitutional, unlawful and illegal indefinitely).

• If The Queen’s Speech MAKES NO MENTION OF A BILL TO ABOLISH THE 1999 ACT, you can take it that the next Government intends to operate unconstitutionally, unlawfully and illegally.

• That will mean that, as is the case with ALL LEGISLATION PASSED AT WESTMINSTER SINCE 2000, the legislative activity of the new British Government will be NULL AND VOID, too.

WHY THE REVOLUTIONARIES HAVE SHOT THEMSELVES IN THE FOOT
Two related points in conclusion:

• Charles I was beheaded when he refused to go along with the Will of Parliament – a fact of history of which every subsequent British Monarch has of course been ‘cognisant’.

• On this occasion, Parliament hasn’t disposed of the Monarch in the aforementioned manner; as a direct consequence of which:

• THE SECRET REVOLUTIONARY INTENTIONS OF THE SUBVERSIVE LABOUR GOVERNMENT HAVE BEEN SELF-FRUSTRATED, GIVEN THAT ALL THEIR LEGISLATION SINCE 2000 IS VOID.

‘SCUM OF THE EARTH’, ‘TOO CLEVER BY HALF’
Shortly after the Blair Government was elected in 1997, an extremely sober and respected British analyst remarked to the Editor that the Labour Government that had just come to power consisted of ‘the scum of the earth’. This gentleman is probably the most upright and sober observer known to the Editor – a person of the highest integrity not inclined to fruity language in any way, shape or form. So when he said this, the Editor took careful note. And it turns out that he was ‘right-on’.

But a characteristic of these self-important parasitical revolutionary scum of the earth is that, since their intentions and behaviour are rooted in lies and confusion, they invariably ‘mess up’. They are always ‘too clever by half’, so that they always wind up with a dog’s dinner.

And in respect of what we have reported above, it can be said that they have messed up quite spectacularly, because ALL their convoluted Talmudic legislation – including of course ALL THE TAX LEGISLATION, ALL THEIR BUDGETS – SINCE 2000, ARE DEFINITIVELY NULL AND VOID.

• Well done, Blair and Brown, you prize revolutionary buffoons.

The British people will always be grateful that your sterile arrogance blinded you to what you were doing, and to what you thought you’d got away with.

WITHOUT ABOLITION OF THE 1999 ACT, THE GENERAL ELECTION IS POINTLESS
Corollaries to this chaotic state of affairs, which the corrupt elements of the Establishment and the bureaucracy thought you’d never hear about, include the following:

• Absent one of the alternatives outlined above (900 individual Bills or outright ABOLITION of the 1999 Act), the incoming Parliament will KNOWINGLY, FOLLOWING THIS POSTING, BE ENGAGED IN FRAUDULENT LEGISLATIVE ACTION, deceiving itself, the nation and foreign powers alike.

• THEREFORE, by extension, THE PRESENT ELECTION WOULD BE A WASTE OF TIME AND A FARCE, entailing the election of a Westminster Parliament WITH NO POWERS TO LEGISLATE.

• INTERFERENCE WITH THIS REPORT:

COVERAGE OF THIS REPORT IS STILL BEING ROUTINELY INTERFERED WITH…
The Google count for this report has been varying UP AND DOWN, which means that they were terrified it would go viral. So the NSA was trying to manipulate the situation by depressing the count. This is the routine: Any heavy content that contains very serious issues and threatens to go viral raises a flag on Google’s site counting mechanism. They look at it, then ask NSA about it, NSA says: SPIKE IT. The link count is then depressed. Or a reset/restore mechanism to previous time or config or settings automatically resets the counter(s) back. Here’s a summary of how the link numbers for this report varied over a very short timeframe, CONFIRMING INTERFERENCE, which proves THEY ARE DEAD WORRIED ABOUT THIS REPORT. They think it’s a threat, whereas it’s a straightforward piece of perfectly justified and accurate investigative journalism. Times shown below are UK times. Look at what happened on 13th April and subsequently….

13 April 2010:
14.00 hrs: 749 links
20.00 hrs: 588 links
20.49 hrs: 684 links
21.47 hrs: 524 links
24.00 hrs: 510 links

14 April 2010
12.27 hrs: 655 links
18.16 hrs: 606 links
23.51 hrs: 645 links

15 April 2010
16.17 hrs: 1,710 links
16.18 hrs: 1,710 links
16.38 hrs: 766 links
17.00 hrs: 1,710 links
17.15 hrs: 842 links
17.52 hrs: 1,630 links
19.13 hrs: 1,310 links
19.30 hrs: 2,180 links
19.40 hrs: 1,310 links

16 April 2010
17.50 hrs: 1,950 links
18.10 hrs: 1,090 links
18.24 hrs: 1,090 links

17 April 2010
23.35 hrs: 2,370 links

19 April 2010
10:30 hrs: 3,190 links
12:15 hrs: 3,750 links
17:45 hrs: 3,190 links

20 April 2010
10:30 hrs: 4,750 links
10:40 hrs: 5,090 links
10:50 hrs: 5,060 links
12:50 hrs: 5,100 links
19:25 3,470 links

21 April 2010
01:15 hrs: 4,780 links

22 April 2010:
13:00 hrs: 7,040 links

• Note re this data: Either the Google counter system is completely out of control, or there is massive ongoing censorship interference with this report. Obviously the latter must apply. Note that an advertisment labelled: direct.gov.uk: Directgov: UK Laws: Government Help & Information, has appeared immediately adjacent to the main Google displays of our report. How odd!

• The point is, they can’t expunge Baroness Ashton of Upholland’s statement in the House of Lords from Hansard. So they are desperate to squash this report before it grows legs. It now has more legs than a centipede, so all they can do is keep suppressing the links. Doesn’t work!

• At 7.22 a.m. on 16th April, the Editor received an email from Melbourne, Australia, stating as follows: ‘Just a short message to let you know that some emails sent out that contained the link to your Report about void UK legislation since 2000, have been interfered with’.

• Notes: Applying quotation marks refines the search to the precise report. The fact that attempts were made to ‘flatten’ the links on this basis PROVES that the report was being suppressed. So, they have been caught cutting down the number of links from 749 to 510, and yet it’s still climbing. This proves that Google censors news reports. It does so at the specific behest of the NSA. In this case NSA may have been asked to assist by the UK’s GCHQ.

Without quotation marks you get coverage of the words used, but not necessarily (after the initial findings) in the same order. You wind up with innumerable unconnected items. But even on THAT odd basis, serious fiddling was going on. Specifically, at 01.10 a.m. on 14th April, 99,400 links were shown on that basis. An hour or so later, that aggregate had been squashed to 12,200 links. And by 15.35 p.m. on 14th April, this number had been reduced to 9,680, indicating that Google had in fact removed nearly 100,000 sites using the headline words, but in any order, in a sweep operation to censor this report. So much for the Internet being free of censorship. By 18.16 p.m., the count had risen back to 102,000, accessing the universe of articles using the same words in any order.

• POSTSCRIPT:

WHEN IT TURNS OUT THAT OBAMA IS AN ILLEGITIMATE HOLDER OF THE U.S. PRESIDENCY, ALL BILLS
THAT HE HAS SIGNED INTO LAW SINCE HIS INAUGURATION WILL TURN OUT TO BE NULL AND VOID TOO. VIEWED IN THIS LIGHT, YOU CAN SEE THAT HIS OCCUPATION OF THE WHITE HOUSE IS A REVOLUTIONARY, SUBVERSIVE OPERATION. WELCOME TO THE WORLD REVOLUTION, FOLKS.

• Now we know why the Belgian ‘President of the European Union’ stated on 14th March that ‘2009 was the first year of the World Government’.

• BY WHICH IS MEANT: WORLD GOVERNMENT BY THE IMMUNE CRIMINALS. THE WORLD REVOLUTION HAS ALWAYS BEEN FIRST AND FOREMOST A CRIMINAL OPERATION.

NOTICES:
Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

CMKM/CMKX $3.87 TRILLION LAWSUIT GOES ‘MAINSTREAM’

cropped-chrisstory

TIM BARELLO’S EXPOSURE REPORT ON EXAMINER.COM

Friday 9 April 2010 11:30

• CMKM DIAMONDS AND THE $3.87 TRILLION LAWSUIT YOU DIDN’T HEAR ABOUT

• UNLESS YOU FOLLOW WORLD REPORTS IN WHICH CASE YOU READ IT HERE FIRST

•* CMKM GOES MAINSTREAM WORLDWIDE AND IN GERMANY
Tim Barello has reported to us from New York [9th April 2010]: ‘Following a tremendous impact from Monday’s RT broadcast (which was seen in over 100 nations, and has since been reproduced and viewed many times over online) and the accompanying Examiner.com article, we can now note that CMKM has gone mainstream in Germany, via ARD, a major German broadcaster.
Link: http://boerse.ard.de/content.jsp?key=dokument_426752

• We have re-dated this report, which was originally posted on 31st March 2010. The Editor is working on reports addressing the accelerating unravelling of the Fraudulent Finance crisis, revolutionary examples of the collapse of the Rule of Law, and the George H. W. Bush I regime’s attempt to grab the Falkland Islands by activating its long-term Nazi assets in Argentina in 1982.

• Like everything else this personification of the Evil One does, that grabitisation ploy collapsed.

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

SECURITIZATION IS ILLEGAL UPDATE: In the Subs/Books Update panel immediately below the NEWS panel that you are currently viewing, you will see an announcement concerning publication of Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 7 & 8. If you press that announcement text and open up the panel, you will see the contents list for the new [2010Q1] issue of E.I.R., including a breakdown of the Chapter Headings for the detailed analysis showing that Securitization is illegal. See our NEWS report dated 10th March 2010 for summaries of some of the data from this analysis. We understand that the report has created uproar in certain corridors of corrupt power.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• OUR PHONE SYSTEMS HAVE NOW BEEN CLOSED DOWN:
Due to incessant Psy-Ops harassment by the Cheney/Biden/NSA criminal operatives, we have had to close down our telephone connections. On returning to the London office, the Editor found 13 obscene messages from the paid USG maniac on our London voicemail overnight 30-31 March, and the USG maniac started up again shortly after noon UK time on 31st. All our telephone connections have therefore been severed and will remain severed and out of service until further notice. As previously noted, we must be doing something right, or these brainwashed sickos in urgent need of brain surgery wouldn’t have been doing this non-stop since February 2008.

• Note: Although we were advised that this is a Cheney/Biden/NSA harassment offensive, we bear in mind that it could be a DVD operation. That would make sense, given Bush Sr.’s links with DVD, and his close association with Dr Helmut Kohl, the former Chancellor of Germany, as a partner in Deutsche AG (formerly Barrington Investment Group) and Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev*. It would also make sense given that this operation started in February 2008, with the Wanta ‘switch’.

• If this is a DVD operation, the US authorities have done NOTHING TO TERMINATE IT, so they are complicit in this illegal harassment and in the STEALING OF OUR COMMUNICATIONS.

• We can be contacted as normal via email or fax, and via the CONTACT US facility below.

* Gorbachev’s KGB/Oligarch associate, Lebedev, who has just lifted some of the stolen funds held in Deutsche AG to bail out the second-rate, loss-making UK newspapers The Independent and The Independent on Sunday, is now presiding over a full-frontal attack on The Queen’s finances in The Independent. This is NOT A COINCIDENCE and represents a new dimension of the ongoing attack on the British Monarchy, which is also being openly assisted by the corrupt German-Jewish Pope Ratzinger, whose contribution so far has been to ‘invite’ disillusioned clergy, bishops and members of the Church of England into his reprobate church, as a means of helping to destroy the Church of England, of which The Queen is Head. If they can destroy the Church of England, they remove a key prop from beneath the Monarchy. The Pope’s cynical offensive against the Church of England, like the Gorbachev/Lebedev offensive against The Queen’s finances, is a DVD operation. The KGB/GRU collaborate with DVD at the highest level, as previously reported by this service.

• MAIN CMKM REPORTS PUBLISHED HERE: SEE ARCHIVE:

• 09 January 2010: Text of the CMKM/CMKX lawsuit against the S.E.C.
Case Number CV10-00031-JVS (MLGX): See also Report dated 7th January 2010

• 29 January 2010: Service of CMKM/CMKX $3.87 trillion suit vs. S.E.C.
Biggest lawsuit in world history: The Phantom Shares giga-scandal

• 02 March 2010: S.E.C. Phantom shares fraud: New Intelligence
Latest developments following the blowing of the cauldron lid

• You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda

REPORT BY TIM BARELLO, EXAMINER.COM, NEW YORK, STARTS HERE:

Tim Barello writes to us from New York City: This article is currently the #1 article on the entire NY hyperlocal site, meaning that hundreds of thousands and possibly millions of unique viewers are seeing it right now at:

http://www.examiner.com/x-9341-Manhattan-Headlines-Examiner~y2010m3d30-CMKM-Diamonds-and-the-387-trillion-lawsuit-you-didnt-hear-about

The link we provided works, but you musn’t include the period at the end of the sentence!!!!!:
http://www.examiner.com/new_york

Editor’s Note: Tim has done a first-rate job of summarising the essential points of the CMKM Case for the general reader.

S.E.C. COMMISSIONERS AT RECEIVING END OF WORLD’S BIGGEST-EVER LAWSUIT
As the United States continues to fracture in every way imaginable, most citizens are unable to keep up with the never-ending hodgepodge of government corruption. Each day, a new larger-than-life scandal emerges, and in the short mind span of news media, there is always a bigger and better story to chase. Right now, the hot button issue for mainstream news outlets is healthcare reform, and its myriad implications for our society; this doubtlessly ensures the aforementioned media will continue to overlook unprecedented accusations brought forth in a recent $3.87 trillion lawsuit against U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Mary L. Shapiro, as well as several other current and former SEC commissioners, among others.

This Bivens action suit represents the largest fraud case in world history, and was filed in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California, on January 8th by Pasadena attorney Al Hodges; in his complaint, made on behalf of CMKM Diamonds shareholders, Hodges alleges that:

• [Complaint paragraph 31] During the period of June 1, 2004 through October 28, 2005 a total of 2.25 Trillion “phantom” shares of CMKM Diamonds Inc, was sold into the public market through legitimate brokers, illegitimate brokers and dealers, market makers, hedge funds, ex-clearing transactions and private transactions” The sales of the majority of such shares were at all times known to the Securities and Exchange Commission, including Defendants herein”.

• [Complaint paragraph 32] At some date prior to June 1, 2004 the Securities and Exchange Commission in concert with the Department of Justice of the United States, together combined with Robert A. Maheu and others to utilize CMKM Diamonds, Inc. for the purpose of trapping a number of widely disbursed entities and persons who were believed to be engaged in naked short selling of CMKM Diamonds Inc. stock and cellar boxing the company.

The Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice, with assistance from the Department of Homeland Security, believed and developed evidence that said short sellers were utilizing their activities to illegally launder moneys, wrongfully export moneys, avoid payment of taxes, and to support foreign terrorist operations.

To fulfill the plan to criminally trap such wrongdoers, the Securities and Exchange Commission, with assistance from the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security:

(a) Assisted in and approved the retention of Roger Glenn, an ex-SEC trial attorney and drafter of Sarbanes-Oxley, to join CMKM Diamonds Inc. for the purpose of verifying claims value, increasing authorized shares of stock to 800,000,000,000, and supervising from the inside of the company;

(b) Encouraged the company to expand its promotional activities, assisted in the set up of the “racing activities” of the company, and underwrote a substantial portion of the cost of such activities;

(c) Consented to, facilitated, and supported the sale of certain company claims to several foreign corporations;

(d) Consented to, facilitated, and supported the conferences between Robert A. Maheu and his associates on the one hand, and the wrongdoing short sellers on the other, all for the purpose of settling the potential liability of said wrongdoers with consent of the U. S. Government and a representation of no criminal prosecution for such illegal sales;

(e) Consented to, facilitated, and supported the declaration of dividends payable by the company to each common shareholder of CMKM Diamonds, Inc.

(f) Consented to, facilitated, and supported the distribution of shares of CIM, a private company owned by Urban Casavant, as a stock dividend, including consent and approval of distribution of said shares to holders of more than 1.4 Trillion shares of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. common stock.
Based on these assertions, CMKM was used by the U.S. government as part of a covert sting operation – unbeknownst to shareholders – to apprehend criminals for their offenses. However, instead of prosecuting most of them, restitution deals were apparently cut:

• [Complaint paragraph 34] During the period from March, 2004 through August, 2006, on behalf of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Robert A. Maheu, with assistance from others, negotiated a settlement with the illegitimate brokers, dealers, market makers, hedge funds, and other persons and entities that had engaged in naked short selling of CMKM Diamonds Inc. stock and cellar boxing the company. In exchange for a U. S. Government promise of no prosecution for such sales, the wrongdoers each promised to pay negotiated amounts to a frozen trust for disbursal at a later time.

• [Complaint paragraph 35] Plaintiffs herein are informed and believe, and based thereon allege, that other moneys have been collected for the benefit of the shareholders of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. from the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation, from the United States Government, and from the sale of additional assets including consent to enter into joint venture agreements with other companies holding mineral claims in Saskatchewan, Canada. Plaintiffs herein are further informed and believe, and based thereon allege, that said moneys, collected for the benefit of shareholders have also been placed in a trust or are otherwise now held in trust by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation and the United States Treasury.

Therefore, the crux of this complaint – and the massive fraud allegedly committed by the SEC (and Department of Justice) – is as follows:

• [Complaint paragraph 36] Plaintiffs herein are informed and believe, and based thereon allege, that at all times mentioned, the Securities and Exchange Commission reserved unto itself the sole and absolute discretion to determine when moneys collected pursuant to the scheme set forth above would and could be released for distribution.

• [Complaint paragraph 37] Demand for release of said moneys has been repeatedly presented to the Securities and Exchange Commission without result. Agents and employees of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice have represented repeatedly that the release of moneys for distribution was imminent, and/or would occur within several weeks, and/or would occur within less than a month. Each of said representations have been made knowing them to be false, and at the specific direction of the named Defendants. These actions of withholding distribution of said moneys, without compensation and without due process of law, amount to a taking of the property of the individual Plaintiffs and of all similarly situated.

During the timeframe referenced above, CMKM was registered as a publicly traded diamond and gold mining company. By 2005, concrete evidence detailing fraud within the company emerged; in addition, it became publicly apparent that CMKM also sold, at the very least, hundreds of billions of unregistered shares – a practice often referred to as naked short selling – to third parties.

Eventually, the SEC moved to delist CMKM stock, whose value never exceeded one penny per share, in accordance with Section 12(j) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. After several administrative proceedings, CMKM stock was ultimately deregistered in October 2005.

In September 2006, Floyd Norris, chief financial correspondent of The New York Times and The International Herald Tribune, caught wind of the CMKM scandals, and began to report on some elements of the criminal fraud that ravaged CMKM’s estimated 40,000 shareholders.

Norris has reported on more than one occasion that at least 259 billion shares of unregistered CMKM stock was sold; however, per the SEC’s 2008 action against CMKM, the agency itself acknowledges that as many as 622 billion shares of “purportedly unregistered stock” was sold by the company over a 20 month period.

So, how did Hodges initially determine that at least 2 trillion unregistered shares were sold?
[Complaint paragraph 25] A frequently asked question (FAQ) page was added to the web site [CMKMTaskForce.com] on the evening of November 4, 2005 and in response to a question about the degree of naked shorting of CMKM stock, the Task Force [consisting of Robert A. Maheu, Donald J. Stoecklein and Bill Frizzell] indicated that “Credible information indicates the number of naked short shares is potentially as high as 2 Trillion shares”.

‘QUITE A CASE’
Several weeks ago, I spoke with Al Hodges, a practicing attorney with four decades of experience, to find out more about this extraordinary case, and moreover, to determine from him exactly how he calculated his clients’ potential damages to be nearly $4 trillion – a figure many observers have openly scoffed at.

Almost immediately, I could not help but ask why the ‘mainstream’ media has not fairly reported on this case; frankly, given the scope of accusations, one would assume that, at the very least, Floyd Norris and The New York Times would have some interest in thoroughly examining the merits of this action; instead, Norris has essentially brushed off Hodges’ allegations as being baseless.
It’s not that Hodges and his associates haven’t tried to attract the media’s interest; in fact, on this side of the Atlantic, all the major dailies, including The Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post have all been informed of the suit.

Their respective editorial staffs – with the exception of Floyd Norris – have utterly decided to ignore it. In the United Kingdom, efforts have also been made to attract mainstream media interest. Veteran financial intelligence Editor and Publisher Christopher Story FRSA – an investigative specialist that focuses on covert government operations and scandals – has personally reached out to The Daily Telegraph’s International Business Editor Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, with whom he is acquainted, to notify him about Hodges’ case. To date, Pritchard has failed to respond to Mr. Story, who has authored a number of articles (1) – and other published commentary – in The Daily Telegraph over the course of his near 50-year-career.

Hodges noted that Story, publisher of International Currency Review, and several other serials, is “subscribed to by every intelligence operation in the world”.

If intelligence agencies are reading about CMKM, then why isn’t the mainstream press covering this case? Hodges prudently observed that “they’re not going to touch it” (2).

MAINSTREAM MEDIA WON’T COVER ISSUES TIED TO COVERT OPERATIONS? (EVIDENTLY NOT)
“They* used the shareholders without their consent to perform this ‘sting operation’ for National Security interests, and it wouldn’t have worked the way it worked if they had disclosed it”, he continued. [*: The Government, i.e. the Intelligence Power: Ed.].

“On the other hand, it isn’t right to bury a company and put them out of business for the purpose of trapping people who are using the company to cheat the government, to line their own pockets, and to fund their operations against the United States”.

As noted above in complaint paragraph 34, and per Hodges, a deal was eventually reached with the aforementioned criminals; they paid the government restitution for documented illegal actions, and in turn, were offered immunity from prosecution.

“Rob Maheu had all these people in a big room in Las Vegas, and made [an] offer to them”, he said.

“Every person, organization and representative in that room stepped up, and either transferred money while they were there, or agreed to transfer money upon some further schedule” to avoid indictment. Hodges also said: “I have a witness who was there, who saw it, and part of the 2.25 trillion phantom shares is documented by that person’s observations of how many shares were represented in that room”.

HOW MUCH MONEY DID THE FEDS REALLY COLLECT FOR RESTITUTION?
“People are going to laugh and titter about the amount of money that is being claimed, but understand the context of the lawsuit”, he said, before concluding: “We are not asking the Government to pay us $3.87 trillion: what we’re asking is for them to release the funds that have been collected for us”. Thus, the implication is that this sum also incorporates substantial punitive damages. Note: Mr Hodges confirmed to the Editor of this service on his return to London on 30th March that the lawsuit proceeds and will be prosecuted, which is causing the individual S.E.C. personnel extreme angst, as can be imagined (3).

In the end, Hodges believes the U.S. Government is going to settle the case before it actually moves to trial. On this possibility, he said, “I think its in the process of happening as we speak”.

Based on these explanations – and the recent scandals and assertions that have surfaced about the SEC – I believe the mainstream media is doing the public a great disservice by not properly examining Hodges’ CMKM case.

The same conclusion must also be drawn about Christopher Story’s reports on the criminality that is undermining international efforts to refund the U.S. dollar, which is dangerously close to losing its status as the world’s global reserve currency…but that’s touching on a whole other can of worms…or is it?

Notes and References:

(1): In Paul Johnson’s article “Unions, Pensions, and Financial Responsibility: The British Experience” published in the Journal of Labor Research, Volume 2, Issue 2 (1981) pp. 292, 294, 295, 296, he highlights Christopher Story’s authoritative research, as published in The Daily Telegraph on 30 April, 31 August and 1 September 1976, as well as on 4 September 1978.

(2): During the Editor’s stay in New York (16th to 30th March), he held conversations with a number of ‘connected’ people. One such impeccable source he has known personally for two decades has confirmed the Editor’s statement that ‘there’s an intelligence cell in every press room’. She replied:
‘That’s absolutely correct’. (One method of obtaining such information is to reach a conclusion and then to put that conclusion to the contact for assessment. If the information is accurate, the usual consequence is that the information will be confirmed. They can confirm or deny, but can’t ‘inform’).

(3): Telephone call placed by the Editor to Mr Hodges on his return to the London office on 30th March, at about 11:00pm UK time.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS ARE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

All securitisation is illegal under US and Common Law: see report dated 10th March 2010.

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time AMENDING AND INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE. In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

A GIFT OF THE HOLY SPIRIT WE RECOGNISE AT EASTER

story4

A BROKEN AND A CONTRITE HEART, O LORD, WILT THOU NOT DESPISE

Sunday 4 April 2010 00:01

• THE TEARS THAT MAY FLOW ON READING CERTAIN PASSAGES OF SCRIPTURE

• THE CHRIST-LIKE COMPASSION OF JOSEPH FOR HIS BROTHERS

• AND PETER WENT OUT, AND WEPT BITTERLY

• WHEN HE HAD OPENED THE BOOK, HE FOUND THE PLACE WHERE IT WAS WRITTEN…

• JESUS EXPLAINS WHY HE WAS SENT, AS ISAIAH FORETOLD

• THE MEETING ON THE ROAD TO EMMAUS

• A BROKEN HEART AND A CONTRITE SPIRIT

THE TEARS THAT MAY FLOW ON READING CERTAIN PASSAGES OF SCRIPTURE
There is a gift of the Holy Spirit which manifests itself by tears when certain passages of scripture are read and understood.

THE CHRIST-LIKE COMPASSION OF JOSEPH FOR HIS BROTHERS
Our first knowledge of this occurs in Genesis, Chapters 42-45, relating the story of Joseph – who displays in 1707 BC many Christ-like attributes, especially compassion, righteousness, resolution and fairness – and his brothers.

Jealous of their younger brother Joseph, who had dreamed symbolically that the half-brothers would one day bow down to the earth before him, the half-brothers plotted to kill him, have his ‘prince’s coat of many colours’ made for him by Jacob (because Joseph was a beloved late son of Jacob’s old age), dipped in the blood of a wild beast, and then lie to their father that Joseph had been torn apart by wild animals. On the intervention of Reuben, the eldest, they opted instead to throw Joseph into a pit – from which he was later rescued and taken down to Egypt by a camel train of nomadic Midianites.

In Egypt, following adversity, he correctly interpreted dreams that had troubled Pharaoh, and the King of Egypt accordingly promoted him to the elevated position of Comptroller of the King’s Household – second only in rank to Pharaoh himself.

When famine later devastated the land of Canaan where Jacob and his large extended family now resided, the brothers decided at their father’s request to go down to Egypt to purchase food, and on arrival the sons discovered that they had to deal with the Comptroller of Pharaoh’s Household, whom they did not know was in fact their half-brother Joseph. Understanding all things, Joseph tested the half-brothers (as Christ tests us), asking them to bring his own full brother Benjamin, down to Egypt, ostensibly in order to prove to Joseph that they were not spies.

When the half-brothers realised that they had no choice in the matter… ‘they said one to another, We are verily guilty concerning our brother (Joseph), in that we saw the anguish of his soul, when he besought us, and we would not hear; therefore is this distress come upon us.

And Reuben answered them, saying, Spake I not unto you, saying, Do not sin against the child; and ye would not hear?…. And they knew not that Joseph understood them; for he spake unto them by an interpreter. And he (Joseph) turned himself about from them, and wept…’ (1)

When in desperation because of the famine they returned to Egypt with Benjamin: …‘They bowed down their heads, and made obeisance. And he [Joseph] lifted up his eyes and saw his brother Benjamin, his mother’s son, and said, Is this your younger brother, of whom ye spake unto me?… And Joseph made haste… for he did yearn upon his brother; and he sought where to weep; and he entered into his chamber, and wept there. And he washed his face, and went out, and refrained himself, and said, Set on bread’ (2) .

Then Joseph sent his brethren away with the corn and the money they had brought to pay for it, and with a silver cup which was placed inside Benjamin’s sack.

But Joseph then sent messengers to overtake them because the silver cup was ‘missing’; and the servants of Joseph discovered the silver cup in Benjamin’s sack. In despair the brothers rent their clothes, and returned to the city, to face their fate, as they imagined, at the hands of Joseph.

On arrival at Joseph’s residence, Judah calmly explained part of the story: ‘My lord asked his servants (the brethren), saying, have ye a father, or a brother?

And we said unto my lord (Joseph), We have a father, an old man, and a child of his old age, a little one (Benjamin); and his brother (Joseph, as they supposed) is dead, and he alone is left of his mother, and his father loveth him’ (3).

And after Judah had explained everything he could, fearing that they would all now be enslaved…

‘Then Joseph could not refrain himself before all them that stood by him; and he cried, cause every man to go out from me. And there stood no man with him, while Joseph made himself known unto his brethren. And he wept aloud; and the Egyptians and the house of Pharaoh heard. [And after Joseph had revealed himself to them, and had told them how God had turned their evil for good]… he fell upon his brother Benjamin’s neck, and wept; and Benjamin wept upon his neck. Moreover he kissed all his brethren, and wept upon them; and after that his brethren talked with him’ (4).

AND PETER WENT OUT, AND WEPT BITTERLY
The Passion of our Lord moves many to tears, perhaps beginning with the passage where, after the cock had crowed, as the Lord had told Peter would happen after he had denied the Lord thrice:

‘And the Lord turned, and looked upon Peter. And Peter remembered the word of the Lord, how he had said unto him, Before the cock crow, thou shalt deny me thrice.

And Peter went out, and wept bitterly.

And the men that held Jesus mocked him, and smote him’ (5).

WHEN HE HAD OPENED THE BOOK, HE FOUND THE PLACE WHERE IT WAS WRITTEN…
And there is the passage when the Lord reads one of the 330+ prophecies from the Old Testament concerning Himself in the synagogue at Nazareth:

‘And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up: and as his custom was, he went into the synagogue on the Sabbath day, and stood up for to read.

And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet Esaias [Isaiah]. And when he had opened the book, he found the place where it was written,

The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised.

To preach the acceptable year of the Lord.

And he closed the book, and he gave it again to the minister, and sat down. And the eyes of all them that were in the synagogue were fastened on him.

And he began to say unto them, This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears.

And all bare him witness, and wondered at the gracious words
which proceeded out of his mouth’ (6).

JESUS EXPLAINS WHY HE WAS SENT, AS ISAIAH FORETOLD
The place in Isaiah that Jesus found and read in the synagogue in Nazareth,
which began at Chapter 61, verse 1, was written in 698 BC:

‘The Spirit of the Lord God is upon me; because the Lord hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound;

To proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord; and the day of vengeance of our God; to comfort all that mourn’ (7).

• To preach the gospel (Good News) to the poor (meek): that is, all who are poor because they have no knowledge of the Truth.

• He hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted: that is, all whose hearts are broken because of despair as they do not have the Hope which comes with the knowledge of the Truth (and all those whose hearts are broken due to their human experiences).

• He hath sent me to preach deliverance to the captives: that is, to those who are captive to the Evil One, bound to Satan – showing them the Way Out and how to make Satan flee from them.

• He hath sent me to preach recovering of sight to the blind: that is, to give sight (enlightenment by the Word of Truth) to those who cannot see that they are being misled and are surely destined to fall headlong with their blind leaders into the ditch (8).

• He hath sent me to set at liberty them that are bruised: that is, to free those who have been bruised by the serpent (the Evil One and his deceivers).

THE MEETING ON THE ROAD TO EMMAUS
And after His resurrection, when the Lord joined two disciples on the road to Emmaus:

‘And behold, two of them went that same day to a village called Emmaus, which was from Jerusalem about threescore (60) furlongs.

And they talked together of all these things which had happened.

And it came to pass, that, while they communed together and reasoned, Jesus himself drew near and went with them (9).

But their eyes were holden that they should not know him.

And he said unto them, What manner of communications are these that ye have one to another, as ye walk, and are sad?

And one of them, whose name was Cleopas, answering said unto him, Art thou only a stranger in Jerusalem, and hast not known the things which are come to pass there in these days?

And he said unto them, What things? And they said unto him, Concerning Jesus of Nazareth, which was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people;

And how the chief priests and our rulers delivered him to be condemned to death, and have crucified him.

But we trusted that it had been he which should have redeemed Israel: and beside all this,
today is the third day since these things were done.

Yes, and certain women also of our company made us astonished,
which were early at the sepulchre;

And when they found not his body, they came, saying, that they had seen a vision of angels, which said that he was alive.

And certain of them which were with us went to the sepulchre, and found it even so as the women had said: but him they saw not.

Then said he unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken:

Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory?

And beginning at Moses, and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.

And they drew nigh unto the village, whither they went; and he made
as though he would have gone further.

But they constrained him, saying, Abide with us: for it is toward evening, and the day is far spent. And he went in to tarry with them.

And it came to pass, as he sat at meat with them, he took bread, and blessed it, and brake,
and gave it to them.

And their eyes were opened (10), and they knew him; and he vanished out of their sight.

And they said one to another, Did not our heart burn within us, while he talked with us by the way, and while he opened to us the scriptures?’ (11).

A BROKEN HEART AND A CONTRITE SPIRIT
Truly, as the Psalmist says:

‘The Lord is nigh unto them that are of a broken heart; and saveth such as be of a contrite spirit. Many are the afflictions of the righteous: but the Lord delivereth him out of them all’ (12).

And when we realise that we have wept on reading and understanding the passages of scripture that move us, the following promise is fulfilled:

‘And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; Even the Spirit of Truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him; but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you… But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you’ (13).

And this promise is fulfilled as well:

‘And lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world’ (14), (15).

Notes and References:

(1): Genesis, Chapter 42, verses 21-24.
(2): Genesis, Chapter 44, verses 28-31.
(3): Genesis, Chapter 44, verses 19-20.
(4): Genesis, Chapter 45, verses 1-2, and 14-15
(5): Luke, Chapter 22, verses 61-63.
(6): Luke, Chapter 4, verses 16-22.
(7): Isaiah, Chapter 61, verses 1-2.
(8): ‘Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch’: Matthew, Chapter 15, verse 14; and: ‘And he spake a parable unto them, Can the blind lead the blind? Shall they not both fall into the ditch?’: Luke, Chapter 6, verse 39.
(9): ‘For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them’: Matthew, Chapter 18, verse 20.
(10): Immediately ahead of His Passion: ‘And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me. Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you’: Luke, Chapter 22, verses 19-20.
(11): Luke, Chapter 24, verses 13-32.
(12): Psalm 34, verses 18-19.
(13): John, Chapter 14, verses 16-17, and 26.
(14): Matthew, Chapter 28, verse 20.
(15): Current controversies concerning the abuse of children – a manifestation of the sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, for which the Lord stated that no forgiveness is possible – are seized upon by ‘sons of Belial’, by the ignorant and by those who have no knowledge of scripture, as indicative of the fact that Christianity is false (which is what they want, for their self-interested convenience, to believe). This enticing delusion rests upon a confusion of the Way, the Truth and the Life as proclaimed by Jesus Christ, with the wayward behaviour of elements within corrupted organised religion. The Evil One is having a ball sticking his filthy tongue out at those who have perpetrated blasphemy against the Holy Spirit in this heinous manner. Deplorable though their behaviour is or was, and irreparable though the damage inflicted upon countless lives has been, the faithful are sustained by the parable of the tares [Matthew, Chapter 13, verses 24-30]:

‘Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, the kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field;

But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way.

But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also.

So the servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? From whence then has it tares?

He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up?

But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.

Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest, I will say to the reapers,

Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them;
but gather the wheat into my barn’.

Now the truly remarkable but little-known fact within this parable is that the Jacobean word ‘tares’ referred to a weed called darnel – which has the characteristic that when sown among the wheat, it resembles wheat initially, for a time. Only when both the wheat and the tares (the darnel) have matured, does the darnel change its appearance so that it can readily be distinguished from the wheat. Such is the depth of the Word of Christ.

• Postscript:
One of our correspondents is a lady based in Washington, D.C., who worked with or was part of the entourage of, President George W. Bush. She writes: ‘Have a blessed Easter. He is Risen, like He said. (I said that to President G.W. Bush a couple years ago at this time of year, and he nodded with a curious look at me, well sort of a scared curious look at me…..).

‘The devils also believe, and tremble’: James, Chapter 2, verse 19.