WORST FINANCIAL TERRORISM SABOTAGE IN HISTORY

story2

U.S. CADRES TOO COWARDLY, WEAK AND FECKLESS TO ARREST BUSH SR. FOR FINANCIAL TERRORISM AND OPEN-ENDED WANTON MAFIOSO SABOTAGE

Saturday 10 July 2010 00:01

NEW INFORMATION:

BELOW:
CIA/MI6.OBAMA/BUSH SR./CHENEY ORDERED CHISTOPHER STORY’S ASSASSINATION
AND ARE SUPRISED AND TERRIFIED THAT HE IS NOT DEAD

OBAMA AND BUSH ‘SPOKEN TO’ BY MEN WITH GUNS

• When ‘President’ Barack Hussein Obama touched down on the White House Lawn at 5:30pm on 9th July, he was ‘spoken to’. Enquiries by this service confirm that those doing the ‘speaking’ were not Secret Service operatives. On the contrary they were men with guns.

• Within the past 24-30 hours, private citizen George Godfather H. W. Bush Sr. has likewise been ‘spoken to’ twice. The people doing the ‘speaking’ were men with guns.

• The Chinese have had enough and are ready to take drastic lethal measures.

• Private citizens George H. W. Bush Sr. and Neil Bush think they are immortal and can take the loot they are blocking to the grave.

• Obama, who answers to the private citizen George H. W. Bush Sr., is saying he’s a ‘national citizen’. In order to be President of the United States, under the Constitution and the Soldiers and Sailors Act, you have to be a NATURAL citizen born in the United States or born in a US military family serving abroad.

CIA/CHENEY/MI6/OBAMA/BUSH SR. HAVE ATTEMPTED
TO ASSASSINATE CHRISTOPHER STORY
A detailed report on this assassination attempt and the horrible illness inflicted on the Editor as a consequence will be published as soon as feasible.

•We now have proof that the CIA/MI6/Obama/Bush/Cheney issued an assassination order against this Editor. We have proof that they are suprised that the Editor is not dead.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• THE WHOLE WORLD AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL KNOWS IN DETAIL ABOUT THIS U.S. CORRUPTION AND CRIMINAL FINANCIAL TERRORISM CRISIS, NOT LEAST FROM THIS WEBSITE. THEY RIGHTLY REGARD THE UNITED STATES AS AN ARROGANT, RUTHLESS PARIAH STATE THAT IMAGINES IT CAN DO WHAT IT PLEASES AS IT DESTROYS ITSELF

• LIENHOLDERS HAVE SEIZED CONTROL OF BANK OF AMERICA, CHARLOTTE, NC., AND OF DEUTSCHE BANK, FRANKFURT AND HAVE CLEANED OUT THE SABOTEURS: SEE BELOW

• HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SIGNED THE NECESSARY PAYOUT DOCUMENTS, AS EXPECTED, DURING HER VISIT TO NEW YORK. SHE WAS DOUBLE-CROSSED BY BUSH SR.

• SEE KEY POINTS BELOW AND CONFIRMATION IN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW A. CLIFTON HODGES’ LETTER TO THE BRITISH CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER, GEORGE OSBORNE, DATED 8TH JULY 2010. THIS LETTER CONFIRMS ALL OF THE KEY POINTS OUTLINED BELOW.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports on the US/German/French official criminality underlying this crisis.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock.

• We sell books DIRECT ONLY. We also supply to bookstores.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• OUR U.S. LANDLINES ARE NOW PERMANENTLY CLOSED BECAUSE OF U.S. HARASSMENT.
WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL, UK FAX OR VIA THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• FOR LATEST INFORMATION ON OUR INTELLIGENCE PUBLICATIONS, SEE SECOND PANEL.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

EMAIL POLICY: All anonymous emails from parties who are too wet and scared to provide their full coordinates as required by our ‘Contact Us’ facility are trashed unread. All uncouth, New Age, rude, discourteous, blasphemous, satanic, goss, filthy and otherwise objectionable emails, including ignorant rants promoting ‘Black’ revisionist claptrap about e.g. the British Monarchy ‘owning’ America and other old Nazi ‘Black’ propaganda emanating from the CIA’s massive lie and disinformation apparat, are trashed. For many years this website has carried a statement at the foot of the reports stating in crystal clear English that we will NOT enter into correspondence concerning the current and earlier reports posted on this website.

• We use simple, plain English so that people can understand what we say.

• We correspond with known and trusted correspondents only. Stray questions about of the blue on matters connected with the Settlements are not answered.

As you can see from the above, we have closed down all our communications because of interminable and intolerable harassment from the United States. We have also added a large number of parties to our ‘Black List’ so that their incessant emails bounce.

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••*

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

• KEY POINTS:

• The Lienholders exercised a foreclosure and management takeover on Friday 2nd and Saturday 3rd July 2010 of Deutsche Bank, Frankfurt, Germany and of Bank of America, Charlotte, NC. They took this action due to ongoing sabotage by the US official keptocracy.

• They immediately removed people in both banks working for the saboteurs and opponents of the necessary resolutions and cleared derivatives (toxic debt) off the balance sheets.

• This took Deutsche Bank out of the control of Bush Sr.’s agent [see earlier reports: Archive], Chancellor Angela Merkel, and the saboteurs in Germany.

• Likewise they took the CIA’s compromised Bank of America out of the control of the corrupt bankers and CIA saboteurs in the United States.

• Her Majesty The Queen signed the necessary authorities for the Refunding Programme, the Loan Facility and other necessary papers during her visit to New York, as expected.

• As a result of the above the necessary funds were available for distribution
on Tuesday 6th July 2010.

• As usual, George Bush Sr. interfered, as a consequence of which the Chinese parties had a ‘talk’ with the corrupt, demonic Godfather Bush Sr.

• By 7th July (Wednesday) a full meeting of Compliance Officers had taken place and the parties were again said to be prepared to initiate the transfers.

• Whereupon the corrupt Leon Panetta, Director of Central Intelligence (CIA), pathetically following ‘instructions’ issued by a private citizen named George H. W. Bush and issued to his poodle in the White House, the gutless Barack Hussein Obama, issued instructions to banking authorities the ‘placate but do not pay’ (accounting for the immediate lies summarised below), thus ‘preventing’ the feckless and terrified banking authorities from making any transfers.

• Bush Sr.’s poodle, Barack Hussein Obama, is too weak and lacking in backbone to grasp that Bush Sr.’s threats [see below] are BLUFF. He lacks the spine to stand up to this crook and face him down, which is the only way to deal with these possessed ‘Black’ US Nazi operatives, as we have amply demonstrated on this website

• On 7th July, the Chinese authorities then had another talk’ with Bush Sr., as a consequence of which the payout procedures were put back in place on that date, to start up at 3:00pm EDT..

• Having thus lied as usual to the Chinese parties, private citizen Bush Sr. contacted Barack Hussein Obama and INSTRUCTED HIM not to allow the release of the funds.

• In that telephone call to the White House, Bush Sr. also threatened that if Obama authorised release of the funds, Bush Sr. would go to the Supreme Court and have Obama’s Presidency terminated’ [see earlier reports, notably the Biden comment on this score].

• As a consequence, the terrified and gutless Obama obeyed the private citizen George H. W. Bush and the agreed-upon payout of the Settlement funds has not taken place.

• Michael C. Cottrell, BA, M.S., was duly advised on Tuesday 6th July that the preliminary payment due to him would be satisfied on that date and that the Loan Facility would be in place on Thursday 8th July 2010.

• On Friday 9th July ‘the word went out’ that Mr Cottrell was not to be paid, the opposite of what had been categorically stated earlier.

• The payments agreed to and set out in the Basel List have not been affected as a direct consequence of this sabotage.

• Given the above, Gold Badges, US Law Enforcement, the corrupted US military under the former CIA Director Robert Gates, et al., are all in continuing dereliction of their duty in failing to arrest and lock up the Financial Terrorist George H. W. Bush Sr., either because they, like Joseph Biden, are all blackmailed and compromised, or because they fear that Mr Bush Sr.’s thuggists will murder them, and because they lack the intelligence to understand that Bush Sr.’s behaviour amounts to nothing more than the familiar childish, weak Psy-Ops BLUFF and bullying overfamiliar to students of the Mafiosi Godfathers, of which this criminal is the most ruthless and dangerous operative alive today.

• US law enforcement, Gold badges, feckless CIA operatives, cloth-eared, arrogant and corrupt US military cadres have accordingly dragged the reputation of the United States below sewer level in the eyes of all in the know at highest levels worldwide, with their gutless behaviour.

• Everyone who is anyone in positions of relevant importance worldwide is fully aware of this scandalous state of affairs, not least from this website, which has enormous clout ‘where it matters’. They had better exercise their powers to put an end to what is undoubtedly the biggest financial terrorism and corruption crisis in world history.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

LETTER FROM ATTORNEY-AT-LAW A. CLIFTON HODGES TO GEORGE OSBORNE,
BRITISH CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER: 8TH JULY 2010

HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
4 EAST HOLLY STREET
SUITE 202
PASADENA
CA 91103

Telephone: (626) 564-9797
Facsimile: (626) 564-9111

A. Clifton Hodges
James S. Kostas
Donald W. Ricketts*
*Of Counsel

July 8th, 2010

MOST URGENT

Sent Via E-Mail and Facsimile
The Right Honorable George Osborne, MP
Chancellor of the Exchequer
HM Treasury
Horse Guards Road
London SW1A 2HQ
Fax No. 020 7270 4580

Re: U.S. Dollar Refunding Project

Dear Honorable George Osborne:

I write to you once more in furtherance of matters raised in my prior correspondence of June 25, 2010; I understand that you have received instructions regarding my approach, and the various points raised in my earlier messages. Your assistance is most urgently required in addressing these matters, and the apparent disavowal of earlier agreements made and reaffirmed at previous G-8 meetings concerning the U.S. Dollar Refunding Project. I write on behalf of my clients Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., of Erie, Pennsylvania, USA, and his corporations: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., registered in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and Cottrell Securities Limited, registered in England and Wales.

The events of the past week are difficult to understand, and impossible to tolerate. I am advised and understand that the Lienholders executed a foreclosure and management takeover Fri-Sat 2-3 July of Deutsche Bank in Frankfurt, Germany, and of Bank of America in Charlotte, NC.

They “cleaned out” both banks of people working for the opponents and cleared toxic debt [including derivatives] off the bank balance sheets. Accordingly, they took DB out of the control of Angela Merkel and opponents in Germany, and they took BOA out of all possible control by the opponents in this country. As a result of these actions, it was expected that the World Global Settlement funds could be distributed this week.

These funds were available for distribution on Tuesday, July 6. Because George Bush Sr. was initiating interference, the Chinese authorities then had a “talk” with Bush Sr. By Wednesday afternoon a full Compliance Officer meeting had been conducted, and the appropriate parties were again prepared to initiate the transfers when Mr. Leon Panetta, pursuant to instructions from President Obama and George Bush Sr. issued instructions to the banking authorities to “placate but do not pay”; this prevented the authorities from making any such transfers. I am advised that the Chinese authorities then had another “talk” with Bush Sr., and all was ready again on today, July 7, and set to commence @ 3:00 PM EDT.

At approximately 3:00 PM EDT, I am told by several sources, George Bush Sr. apparently contacted President Obama and instructed him not to allow release of the funds. Bush Sr. then advised the President that if the funds were released, Bush would “go to the Supreme Court and have Obama’s Presidency terminated”. In accord with these instructions, the payout of the World Global Settlement funds has not proceeded.

THE PAYMENTS PREVIOUSLY AGREED TO AND SET FORTH ON THE BASEL LIST HAVE NOT BEEN MADE AS A DIRECT RESULT OF THESE CONTINUED DELAYS. Direct intervention through your good offices on behalf of the Royal Monarchal Power, is absolutely required to bring this matter to conclusion. To secure release of these Settlement funds, it is imperative that your power as one of the U.S. Treasury Lienholders, be exercised with such force as may be required to effect completion.

I respectfully plead that you utilize the inherent Royal Monarchal Power at the earliest possible moment to ensure completion of this funding. Thank you in advance for your assistance; please contact me directly if I can provide any additional information or help.

Sincerely,

HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
A. CLIFTON HODGES

ACH/gm

Cc: Lindell H. Bonney, Sr.
Colonel Dana Wilcox
Michael C. Cottrell, BA, MS
President Barack Obama
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II
Interpol, USNCB

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

THE FOLLOWING DATA HAS BEEN PUBLISHED AT THE FOOT
OF MOST OF THESE REPORTS FOR THE PAST THREE YEARS++:

• COMPILED BY U.S. SECURITIES EXPERT MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S..

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”.

Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge:
Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
NOTICES:

BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE.

In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest annual fee. This is done on-line in the usual way [direct with supplier].

Save

Advertisements

OBAMA LIES AND DOUBLE-CROSSES THE G-8 AND G-20

cropped-chrisstory

TORONTO ATTENDEES FALSELY TOLD THAT PAYMENTS WERE MADE ON THURSDAY 24TH JUNE. CIA’S BANK OF AMERICA LIES THAT PAYOUTS TO BONNEY OCCURRED.

Sunday 27 June 2010 01:01

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

IN REALITY A FURTHER $4.7 TRILLION HAS BEEN STOLEN
ON TOP OF $1.8 TRILLION STOLEN FROM PAYOUT FUNDS ON 10TH JUNE
UPDATE: Sunday pm UK: The $4.7 trillion has been found. It had been placed on overnight.

‘PRESIDENT’ OBAMA DELIBERATELY DECEIVES THE G-8 AND G-20 DELEGATIONS

UPDATE: G-20 DELEGATES LAUGHED AT OBAMA WHEN HE LIED TO THEM THAT THE
PAYMENTS HAD BEEN EFFECTED. REASON: THEY HAD ALL RECEIVED COPIES OF
ATTORNEY HODGES’ LETTER, POSTED BELOW, TO GEORGE OSBORNE, THE BRITISH CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER. THIS CONTAINS EXTREMELY DAMAGING FACTS.
So the G-20 powers are ALL FULLY APPRAISED of the Obama White House’s criminality.

LETTER FROM LAWYER A. CLIFTON HODGES TO GEORGE OSBORNE,
BRITISH CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER, DATED 25TH JUNE 2010:
THIS LETTER CONTAINS DYNAMITE INTELLIGENCE

OTHER EVIL DEVELOPMENTS, IN SUMMARY

MALICIOUS RUMOURS ABOUT THE QUEEN

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports on the US/German/French official criminality underlying this crisis.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock.

• We sell books DIRECT ONLY. We also supply to bookstores.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• OUR U.S. LANDLINES ARE NOW PERMANENTLY CLOSED BECAUSE OF U.S. HARASSMENT.
WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL, UK FAX OR VIA THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY.

• FOR LATEST INFORMATION ON OUR INTELLIGENCE PUBLICATIONS, SEE SECOND PANEL.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

OBAMA DELIBERATELY DECEIVES THE G-8 AND G-20 DELEGATIONS
In a further confirmation of ‘President’ Obama’s serial and embedded criminality and Financial Terrorism, he has tried to bamboozle the G-8 and G-20 attendees in Toronto into accepting false assurances that the hijacked assembled payouts were effected on 24th June 2010.

No-one in attendance believes a word this criminal says any more, given his successive lies, the last of which we reported prior to the preceding report, being ‘President’ Obama’s ultra vires intervention to delay the payments over a long weekend to 1st June, a reckless move which laid him open to litigation as being personally responsible for that delay (having pierced the veil of his office and acted outside its parameters), and thus personally liable to disgorge billions of dollars plus accrued compound interest.

• When he leaves office he may be sued for billions of dollars.

In response to ‘President’ Obama’s lies and his blatant deception of the G-8 and G-20 powers, we publish below the letter from Mr A. Clifton Hodges to the Rt Hon George Osborne, British Chancellor of the Exchequer dated 25th June 2010. It contains dynamite intelligence.

You will readily understand that by presenting the damning intelligence contained in this lawyer’s letter by this means, the Editor is spared unavoidably ill-informed bombardment by people who cannot possibly be expected to know the gory detail of what is going on behind the scenes. Such intelligence can only be procured from the actual sources, not from secondary, tertiary or hearsay provenance.

This implies no criticism whatsoever of outside concerned parties who are as anxious as we are for this snakepit of gross evildoers to be consigned to the everlasting lake of fire as soon as possible: which of course is where every single one of them is headed anyway.

Contained in Mr Hodges’ letter to George Osborne is confirmation that instead of the monies being released, $4.7 trillion was diverted/stolen, on top of the $1.8 trillion that was stolen on 10th June 2010, which we report here for the first time.

The diverted $4.7 trillion is of course being illegally traded over this weekend.

It is correct that resistance to the Settlements and the US Dollar Refunding Programme is motivated, in accordance with the orders of the Head Serpent, George H. W. Bush and his criminal CIA-apparat, from whom (as you will see in Mr Hodges’ letter, Financial Terrorist ‘President’ Obama takes his instructions), by the reality that the releases and the US Dollar Refunding Programme will completely decapitate the entire secret power of the criminal Financial Terrorism Octopus once and for all. This is the secret essence of this crisis.

That’s why the US Congress, implicated up to its criminalist eyeballs, has been ducking and weaving, to try to preserve the Fraudulent Finance carousel which is what keeps the criminal enterprise banks alive. The Basel III norms have also been modified somewhat. The new US banking legislation is unspeakably dreadful, the product of twisted, compromised minds bent on maximising wriggle room, rather than resolution.

Speculation that the mechanism of the Dollar Refunding Programme will leave the United States permanently indebted to HM The Queen, is idle, ill-informed claptrap.

The mechanism is self-financing, has no implications for the United States and its people apart from the singular fact that it showers windfall tax accruals transparently onto the unwilling US Treasury’s books, thereby reversing the century-long US deficit-financing death trap, which the criminalised US Treasury has been seeking to retain contrary to all logic, common sense and morality, in order to preserve the bankers’ ramp Financial Terrorism carousel.

• The lender is repaid from the proceeds of the on-the-books trades after UK and US taxation.

Following the expiry of ‘President’ Obama’s fake 1st June deadline, the CIA was at a loss to know what to do next; so they compiled dossiers based on false data and false witness to try to discredit Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., and Attorney-at-Law Mr A. Clifton Hodges, which they sent to MI-6 and possibly also to Buckingham Palace.

MI-6 responded by asking the MI-6 approved Gold Badge (i.e. also CIA) Paymaster his opinion of the dossiers. Mr Bonney responded by telling MI-6 that they were ‘largely wrong’, believed to be an understatement. He could hardly have done otherwise, as it was Mr Bonney himself who investigated Mr Cottrell and gave him a completely clean bill of health. Our sources inform us that the dossiers were ‘laughed at’ on this side of the Atlantic.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

LETTER FROM LAWYER A. CLIFTON HODGES TO GEORGE OSBORNE,
BRITISH CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER, DATED 25TH JUNE 2010:
THIS LETTER CONTAINS DYNAMITE INTELLIGENCE

HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
4 EAST HOLLY STREET
SUITE 202
PASADENA
CA 91103

Telephone: (626) 564-9797
Facsimile: (626) 564-9111

A. Clifton Hodges
James S. Kostas
Donald W. Ricketts*
Of Counsel

June 25, 2010

Sent Via E-Mail and Facsimile:
The Right Honorable George Osborne, MP
Chancellor of the Exchequer
HM Treasury
Whitehall
London SW1A 2HQ
Fax No. 020 7270 4580

Re: U.S. Dollar Refunding Project

Dear Honorable George Osborne:

I write to you on a most urgent basis in furtherance of matters raised in my prior correspondence to Buckingham Palace; I understand that you have been instructed and made aware of my approach, and the various points raised in my earlier notices. Your assistance is most urgently required in addressing matters of world financial concern, and the apparent disavowal of earlier promises to accept U.S. Dollar Refunding Project agreements made and reaffirmed at earlier G-8 meetings.

I most recently wrote to the Palace on May 28, 2010 to solicit the assistance of your government in securing the release of funds being held in the U.S. which are required for implementation of the U.S. Dollar Refunding Project. I write to you again in furtherance to that subject, on behalf of my clients Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., of Erie, Pennsylvania, USA, and his corporations: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., registered in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and Cottrell Securities Limited, registered in England and Wales.

The events of the past few days are particularly troubling. As of the afternoon of June 25, 2010, I am advised and understand the following:

World Global Settlement funds had been collected and were in the custody of the Bank of America in Richmond, Virginia.

Said funds were sufficient to cover all disbursements to be made by the authority of the Paymaster for the purpose of concluding these transfers in accord with the BASEL agenda.

On May 27, 2010 US President Barack Obama personally intervened in the scheduled May 27 release of funds, and instructed that the funds be held until after the U.S. Memorial Day Holiday.

I personally wrote to President Obama, protesting his actions, a copy of which was also submitted to the British Royal Monarchal Power; Mr. L.H. Bonney, Sr. personally verified that a copy of the letter was submitted to, and received by, HM The Queen via MI-5 and MI-6.

US Vice President Biden was also provided a copy of the May 27, 2010 letter and acknowledged the veracity of President Obama taking direction from former President G.H.W. Bush; he indicated that President Obama’s citizenship status was being used as very effective leverage against the President, and also admitted that he was personally compromised.

Mr. L. H. Bonney, Sr. has confirmed at Bank of America that no communication has yet been received from President Obama regarding authorization for release of the Settlement funds.

On June 23, 2010 Mr. Bonney advised that “they are letting the Obama/Bank of America people believe they are in control” giving them rope to hang themselves, and after 5:00 PM the funds will be released to his custody; he also advised that the Chinese lien-holder will act on Thursday in accord with the Special Foreclosure.

Although moneys for complete payout were confirmed by the Federal Reserve/Bank of America, US Vice President Biden was at the same time advising authorities that he is ready to “move on, and out of the White House”.

On Thursday, June 24, 2010 Mr. L.H. Bonney, Sr. advised that payment must be released to him by noon or there would be “hell to pay”; Vice President Biden was unable to obtain immunity such that he could “move on” even though Hilary Clinton had voiced a desire to be appointed Vice President of the United States.

The Chinese lien-holder was insisting on payment release after funds had been reconfirmed, even though a further attempt was made to steal the funds by Obama’s California banker, Carlson; as a result, all of Obama’s bankers and most (if not all) of the Bushs’ bankers have now been arrested.

In the evening of June 24, a video tele-conference between the “company” [the CIA] and the Connecticut Trustee, Paul Sigue, regarding the release/movement of funds was held; there is a concern that on release, stolen funds will be moved and paid to the Bush/Clinton cabal.

Mr. Bonney also advised that the Foreclosure Date is not June 24, 2010 – it is actually July2, 2010; although Mr. Bonney advised that three trusts would be paid out on June 24, such payout would not include payment for the U.S. Dollar Refunding Project, or anyone associated with it; Dana Wilcox later advised that any payouts made would include all parties.

[Editor: The obfuscation and redirection, confusion-maximising dialectic as usual].

As of 10:30 AM EDT this morning of June 25, 2010, the display screens at Bank of America, Richmond, Virginia were blank, indicating that the funds had been removed; no information was available to any party or payee regarding the location and/or distribution of such funds before 12:30 PM, which results in a further delay until Tuesday, June 29, 2010.

Just prior to the 12:30 PM deadline, Dana Wilcox verified that at least $ 4.7 Trillion of the funds had been removed to an unknown location; accordingly, he advised Mr. Lindell H. Bonney, Sr. to call MI-6, Her Majesty the Queen, Geneva, Switzerland, and San Marino, Italy, to inform them that the FUNDS ARE MISSING and HAVE NOT BEEN PAID OUT or released to Mr. Bonney.

All members and attendees at the G-8 and G-20 meetings should be made aware that THE PAYMENTS PREVIOUSLY AGREED TO AND SET FORTH ON THE BASEL LIST HAVE NOT BEEN MADE, AS A DIRECT RESULT OF THE ACTIONS OF OBAMA, ET. AL. [see above].

As of 1:15 PM EDT this afternoon, the Bank of America in Richmond is now alleging that THE PAYOUTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND RELEASED TO MR. BONNEY

I am persuaded by these facts, that direct intervention of the Royal Monarchal Power through your good offices, is absolutely required to bring this matter to conclusion. To secure release of these Settlement funds, it is now imperative that this power, as a U.S. Treasury lien-holder, be exercised forcefully to effectuate resolution.

Any further delay not only jeopardizes the severely stressed world financial condition, but serves to encourage those seeking even further delay.

This is a matter which can now only be concluded at such time as the Royal Monarchical Power utilizes the power which has been granted; direct intervention is imperative.

Thank you very kindly in advance for your help; it is truly appreciated by many, and will have significant impact on the future financial health of the world.

Sincerely,

HODGES AND ASSOCIATES

[Signed]

A. CLIFTON HODGES

ACH/gm

Cc: Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II
Lindell H. Bonney, Sr.
Dana Wilcox
Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S.
President Barack Obama
Interpol, USNCB

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

OTHER EVIL DEVELOPMENTS, IN SUMMARY
Observe first that whenever these filthy Nazi snakes ‘pull’ a contrived abomination, the diversion, obfuscation, redirection and rank disinformation apparat in the background immediately disgorges one or more ‘explanations’.

Using third party websites which specialise in leveraging the potential for intensifying the fog of confusion and redirection, plus controlled ‘mainstream’ broadcast and press outlets, layer upon layer of further ‘explanations’ and speculation are piled on top of the early fabricated ‘explanations’, with the objective of ensuring that the truth of the sabotage is blotted out.

(1): The BP oil spill is of course a dreadful case in point. Evidence that this is a Cheney-orchestrated sabotage operation emerged right at the very start of the reporting with that information about criminal enterprise (see our earlier reports, passim) Halliburton’s dud cement component, and Halliburton’s purchase three months earlier of a clean-up firm. Transocean, the US owner and operator of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig, relocated to Zug, Switzerland, two years ago. Zug ‘just happens’ to be where Mark Rich operates. Mark Rich’s real name is Hans Brand, a long-range German Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD, Nazi strategic deception) operative.

The report that BP appraised The Obama Administration on 13th February 2010 that the Deepwater Horizon was leaking oil and natural gas onto the ocean floor, is accurate.

BP was fighting large cracks at the base of the well for roughly ten days in early February.

BP asked for the US Administration’s assistance long before the deadly accident. The Obama Administration was therefore fully cognisant of the situation (naturally, since Halliburton is one of its main ‘Black’ operations) a long time before the mysterious explosion in April.

• It follows, therefore, that the Terrorist Obama Administration is criminally implicated in this deliberately ‘permitted’ catastrophe.

The purpose of this operation has been (a) to divert attention from the illegal terrorist hijacking, blocking and stealing of the payout funds, in exactly the same way that 9/11 was used inter alia to destroy and annul the Cantor Fitzgerald contracts; and (b) to provide the Dark Actor Playing Games in the White House with scope for blaming the British. Why blame the British?

Because The Queen, with the Chinese, has not yielded to this criminality and is party to the $47 trillion lien on the Treasury that we originally announced effective around 6th December 2009; and because the approved Dollar Refunding Programme, which is to be operated because of the US intransigence from London, strikes at the very heart of the Fraudulent Finance carousel and, in the context of the Settlements, destroys the entire corrupt universe of fraudulent, illegal securitisation ‘assets’ (derivatives), thereby nullifying the secret power of the Octopus.

• See our ‘securitisation is illegal’ report.

The most senior and respected of Lady Thatcher’s former Ministers, Lord Young, was reported in The Times (19th June 2010) to be furious with President Obama.

Lord Young told the London newspaper:

‘His behaviour has been appalling. He sounds petulant and I do think he’s anti-British. It was symbolic that he sent back the bust of Winston Churchill that used to be in the White House. He let BP be the lightning conductor, not him’.

Cheney was admitted to the George Washington University hospital on Friday 25th June after complaining of feeling ill. He was expected to remain there over the weekend. Cheney has had five heart attacks in 32 years. He is also known on occasion to have suddenly entered hospital for hiding purposes when vulnerable to being ‘whacked’, only to be collected by his limo from a back door, on the risky and typically arrogant assumption that no-one would notice.

(2): The European leg of the long-range Nazi pan-German subversion and strategic deception operation in Europe, symbolised by the Euro, is indeed in severe jeopardy, as was predicted in International Currency Review in the 1990s, after the Maastricht Treaty, containing the same chapter headings as Europaische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft (European Economic Community), that Nazi compendium published in Berlin in 1942, was rammed though in 1992.

When the key insider operative George Soros decides that a ‘game’ is over, he’s using inside information, not just his supposed ‘guru’ abilities.

Soros was reported earlier in June to have told Die Zeit:

‘German policy is becoming a danger that could destroy the European project. A collapse of the Euro cannot now be excluded. Unless Germany changes policy, its withdrawal from the currency union would be helpful for the rest of Europe. At the moment Germany is pushing its neighbours into deflation; this threatens a long phase of stagnation, leading to nationalism, social unrest, and xenophobia. It endangers democracy’

Berlin, added George Soros, was treating the Maastricht Treaty as a ‘sacred text’ and was failing to understand that events had moved on. That would be typical of the Nazi mentality.

• Wir sind immer rechts. We are never wrong. If we are, we never acknowledge that we are wrong and we never will. Hitler never acknowledged his stupidity in invading the USSR either.

Not to be outdone, the President of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso, briefed trade union chiefs earlier in June, painting an ‘apocalyptic’ vision in which ‘crisis-hit countries in Southern Europe could fall victim to military coups or popular uprisings as interest rates soar and public services collapse because their governments run out of money’.

Of course when veteran private observers predict such eventualities, no-one takes much notice. But when members of the ‘Great and the Good’ [sic] finally come to recognise, decades later, the accuracy of such warnings, people sometimes sit up.

(3): Deutschemark requoted: BoersenNEWS, a large German stock market portal, has, since the second week of June 2010, reintroduced quotations in DEM, alongside EUR quotations.

BoersenNEWS explained: ‘Due to the ongoing Euro crisis, many investors expect the return of the Deutsche Mark. A recent survey showed that 39% of 1,364 boersennews.de users would like the good old Deutsche Mark reintroduced. BoersenNEWS has responded and therefore will immediately display share prices in Euro and Deutsche Mark… The Euro represents a cracked economic system, not only in the world, in Europe, but above all in Germany’.

It will be recalled that we have on several occasions reported that, during a press conference in 1998, Dr Hans Tietmeyer, then President of the Bundesbank, was asked whether, in view of the impending introduction of the Collective Currency (Euro), the Bundesbank had taken the obvious precaution to hoard a stock of Deutsche Marks, for rapid distribution in the event of the Euro failing and the Bundesbank having to take emergency action as a consequence.

Instead of pooh-poohing the question and the questioner, Dr Tietmeyer did not respond.

(4): In Memoriam and Horizontalisation News: Haaretz reported on 22nd June that Danny Barack, 48, CEO of the Israeli firm Leader Capital Markets, jumped to his death on the preceding afternoon from the 17th Floor of Platinum Tower, the office building housing the firm’s headquarters.

(5): Gordon Brown wrecked an antique Downing Street table:
The demons inside the former UK Prime Minister were revealed shortly after the Cameron team entered Downing Street on 11th May 2010. They were concerned to discover deep grooves in the antique mahogany table in a panelled, ground floor office.

So extensive was the damage that an enquiry was held into who, or what, could have caused such reckless destruction. A Downing Street source was reported in The Daily Telegraph on 13th June as explaining: ‘It became apparent that the marks were caused by his [Brown’s] manic scratchings. He was clearly writing very angrily with his pen and the marks came through the paper onto the table. Some are two or three inches long and very deep’.

Specialist cleaners have been unable to remove the marks despite frantic polishing. The gauged mahogony table will therefore remain unrepaired in Downing Street: an appropriate memorial to the most destructive Chancellor and Prime Minister in British history.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

MALICIOUS RUMOURS ABOUT THE QUEEN
Suggestions running riot among the more scurrilous, reckless and irresponsible dimensions of the Internet that Her Majesty The Queen will abdicate, are evil, gross malicious lies fed to the lemmings who specialise in magnifying the fabrications and confusion fed to them by the Bush-Clinton-CIA-DVD lie machine and who lack all discernment. The Queen will NOT abdicate the Throne: that is a definitive statement, and all those who are promulating this grotesque ‘Black’ lie are assisting the kleptocracy as it struggles for its continued existence in the face of the unprecedented squeeze it never anticipated, which is devouring the Octopus’s ‘Black’ power.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

THE FOLLOWING DATA HAS BEEN PUBLISHED AT THE FOOT
OF MOST OF THESE REPORTS FOR THE PAST THREE YEARS++:

• COMPILED BY U.S. SECURITIES EXPERT MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S..

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”.

Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge:
Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
NOTICES:

BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE.

In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest annual fee. This is done on-line in the usual way [direct with supplier].

WHY ADMIRAL DENNIS C. BLAIR WAS SACKED BY OBAMA

chrisstory

HE PUSHED FOR THE RELEASES AND OBTAINED COPY CHECKS OF BIDEN, GEITHNER AND EMANUEL’S BUSH BRIBERY PAYMENTS

Monday 24 May 2010 02:30

• NEWS FLASH: 25th May 2010: Timothy Geithner, the US Treasury Secretary and corrupt Payola recipient, tried to do a deal with the Chinese authorities during his just-completed visit to Peking (which was why he went there) and was told in no uncertain terms: NO DEAL. GET IT DONE.

• NOTE ALSO SEPARATE IMPORTANT UPDATES [25TH MAY] INCORPORATED IN THE TEXT

• SEE UNDER THE GREEK SEGMENT BELOW:
THE GREEK DEBTS ARE VOID BECAUSE THE UNDERLYING CONTRACTS WERE ENTERED INTO FOR AN ILLEGAL PURPOSE. THEREFORE, THE GREEKS SHOULD REPUDIATE 100% OF THE FRAUDULENT DEBT ON THIS SOUND LEGAL BASIS, AND SEND THE FOREIGN (INCLUDING GERMAN) MONEY BACK WITH A NOTE SAYING: ‘THANKS, BUT ON SECOND THOUGHTS, NO THANKS’. THIS WOULD ACCELERATE THE TOTAL COLLAPSE OF THE FRAUDULENT FINANCE SECTOR, WHICH IS HAPPENING ANYWAY. GREECE WOULD BE ON SOLID LEGAL GROUND.

• THE REAL REASONS BEHIND THE ‘RESIGNATION’ OF ADMIRAL DENNIS C. BLAIR

• BIDEN TOLD WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF HE DOESN’T CEASE AND DESIST

• OBAMA’S LIES TO THE HIGHEST BRITISH AUTHORITY EXPOSED

• UPDATE, 25th May: THE SARAH FERUGSON EPISODE:
ANOTHER OPERATION AGAINST THE BRITISH MONARCHY

• THE CURSE OF STORY

• CHENEY’S ATTEMPT TO STEAL $2.0 TRILLION FROM BoA, ATLANTA

• UPDATE, 25th May: CHENEY ET AL THEN TRIED TO CASH BOGUS CERTIFICATES IN PARIS

• CRIMINAL CIA OPERATIVE CHENEY WALKS AWAY FROM HIS ATTEMPTED BANK ROBBERY.
A BRIT GETS THREE MONTHS AND DEPORTATION FOR A MINOR TRAFFIC INFRACTION.

• WHY DID THE CIA’S BANK PHYSICALLY EJECT CHENEY ET AL?

• THE WORLD FELL APART WHILE THE CROOKS CONTINUED STEALING

• CRISIS AND CURE ARE EXCLUSIVELY RESULTS OF THE CRIMINALITY EXPOSURES

• AS MI6 HAS JUST DISCOVERED, THE WHITE HOUSE LIES TO EVERYONE, EVEN THE QUEEN

• THE CURSE OF GEORGE H. W. BUSH AND THE ‘EUROPEAN CRISIS’

• CITIBANK, ATHENS: LOCUS OF WANTA’S BUSH SR. ACCOUNTS

• GERMAN BANKS SCAMMED BY BUSH, WHEREAS STOLEN BUSH
AND GORBACHEV PROCEEDS ARE STASHED IN ST GALLEN, SWITZERLAND

• BEHIND AGITPROP SECRETARY MERKEL’S ‘EURO IN DANGER’ PLOY

• FORMER BUNDESBANK PRESIDENT DID NOT DENY IN 1998 THAT GERMANY
MAY HAVE HOARDED DEUSTCHEMARKS IN ANTICIPATION OF THE EURO COLLAPSING

• GREECE SHOULD HAVE TURNED DOWN
THE GERMAN MONEY AND RESTORED THE DRACHMA

• U.S. SENATE BLOCKS IMF PAYMENTS TO DEBT SPIRAL COUNTRIES

• PAN-GERMAN POLITICAL HEGEMONY PROJECT UNRAVELLING

• 9/11: MORE DOCUMENTED ‘SMOKING GUN’ INTELLIGENCE

• REPORT FROM LONDON: ‘NICK, NICK, THE QUEEN EXPECTS ME TO GO’

• DOCUMENTS PREVIOUSLY BLOCKED BY BROWN (ON BEHALF OF GEORGE W. BUSH)
DELIVERED AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL IMMEDIATELY AHEAD OF BROWN’S RESIGNATION

• NEW UK GOVERNMENT RUSHES TO INGRATIATE ITSELF ABROAD: A SIGN OF WEAKNESS

• WHY HAMID KARZAI CIRCULATED D.C. IN AN ARMOURED ‘CARAVAN’

• CAMERON COW-TOWS TO SARKOZY, STANDS UP TO MERKEL

• EUROPEANS TOLD THINGS THEY DIDN’T WANT TO HEAR

• MERKEL DEPLOYS HER COMMUNIST EXPERTISE TO PRESS FOR A NEW TREATY

• NEW U.K. GOVERNMENT FAILING TO ADDRESS CRUCIAL ISSUES

• ANNEX THE VAT TAX REVENUES TO THE TREASURY

• VAST, UNSUSTAINABLE COST OF BRITISH E.U. MEMBERSHIP

• 55% RULE REVEALS COALITION’S FEAR IT CANNOT OTHERWISE SURVIVE

• LIST OF ISSUES THAT NEED URGENT ATTENTION
BUT ARE BEING IGNORED BY THE COALITION

• COALITION INFESTED BY GERMAN ‘COMMON PURPOSE’ PSY-OPS

• SEVERE TENSIONS ALREADY WRACKING BOTH COALITION PARTNERS

ANNOUNCEMENT: 17 MAY 2010: INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW RELEASED WORLDWIDE
Outline details of this week’s release of International Currency Review are displayed in the second panel immediately below the NEWS panel on our Home Page. Also released are two further issues of Arab-Asian Affairs. Volume 33, # 5 of this title reveals how the Israeli authorities disguised the physical identity of David Kimche, the Israeli spymaster, drug controller and Director of the Israeli Foreign Office, even after his death, which took place on 8th March 2010.

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

• AS PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED, OUR LANDLINES REMAIN CLOSED BECAUSE OF UNLAWFUL U.S. HARASSMENT. WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL OR THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

THE REAL REASONS BEHIND THE ‘RESIGNATION’ OF ADMIRAL DENNIS C. BLAIR
On Friday 21st May 2010, Admiral Dennis C. Blair, the Director of National Intelligence, announced his resignation from the top US intelligence post. He gave no reason for his sudden departure in a public statement that he circulated to the 16 US intelligence agencies that he oversaw, and neither did he express thanks to President Barack Obama for the opportunity to serve under him.

In order to obfuscate the real reason for Blair’s de facto dismissal – Obama asked him to resign, or said he would accept his resignation – the White House and the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) have since been engaged in an operation to pull the wool over the eyes of the ‘mainstream’ media and the ‘Fifth Estate’ (the ‘Internet community’).

Specifically, to take the most mischievous report on this subject first:

• The Office of Naval Intelligence diversionary source labelled ‘By Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers’, item headed ‘Top US Spy Chief Quits After Obama Orders 2 Americans Assassinated’, consists of disinformation and lies. On about half a dozen previous occasions we have specifically identified the authors of this diversionary source as:

(1): Commander J. Forrest Sharpe, of Light in the Darkness Publications, based in Vienna, VA, Sharpe is ‘active duty submarine service fleet’, i.e. an Office of Naval Intelligence operative.

(2): D. L. O’Huallachain, of Irish extraction, who inter alia covers for the Vatican.

These reports typically begin with the ignorant fantasy: ‘Rumors circulating in the Kremlin today…’, notwithstanding that, as the veteran Editor of Soviet Analyst, your correspondent can reconfirm that the Kremlin ‘doesn’t DO rumours’. Even though we have repeatedly exposed this deception, certain US websites specialising in maximising the potential for confusion persist in deceiving the public by disseminating the disinformation perpetrated by this malicious ‘redirection’ source.

All ANONYMOUS reports are suspect: and because they are not provenanced, can and should never be relied upon. Sorcha Faal is a fabrication. Anyone recycling the diversionary claptrap spewed out by this US Intelligence Power ‘redirection’ source, is being grossly irresponsible.

• On 21st May, The New York Times published a piece by Mark Mazzetti which entered the fray by starting with the following diversionary lead-in: ‘An already strained relationship between the White House and the departing spymaster Dennis C. Blair erupted earlier this year over Mr Blair’s efforts to cement close intelligence ties to France and broker a pledge between the nations not to spy on each other, American Government officials said Friday’.

Although there WAS a French dimension to what happened (see below), this ‘line’, as presented, was clearly diversionary because, as we have repeatedly explained, France fronts for Germany under the ‘indissoluble’ bilateral Franco-German Treaty of the Elysée dated January 1963; and since the ‘Black’ criminal cadres inside the US Intelligence Power ‘work with’ the long-range pan-German Fifth Column that has attempted to ‘take down’ the United States in accordance with the Nazi slogan ‘We will build the Thousand-Year Reich on the Ruins of the United States’, there was never any need to ‘cement relations’ with French intelligence or to formalise a closer relationship.

In other words, this ‘line’ invented by the White House/CIA disinformation apparat deliberately turned the ‘actualité’ upside down, to bamboozle the readers of The New York Times and the domestic and international communities generally,

Interestingly, The New York Times’ elaboration included the following sentence: ‘Officials said the dust-up was not the proximate cause of President Obama’s decision to remove Mr [sic] Blair, who announced his resignation on Thursday, from the job as Director of National Intelligence’.

Quite right, it wasn’t.

On the contrary, the factors underlying Admiral Blair’s ‘resignation’ were as follows:

• Admiral Dennis C. Blair had been pressing for months for the release of the hijacked funds blocked by President Barack Obama.

• Admiral Dennis C. Blair ‘asked’ President Obama to release the hijacked funds forthwith, and Obama REFUSED. Obama then demanded Blair’s resignation, which was accepted.

• Admiral Dennis C. Blair had acquired COPY CHECKS proving that, as we alone reported, Vice President Joseph Biden, US Treasury Secretary Geithner, and Rahm Emanuel, the White House Chief of Staff, were and are receiving weekly and monthly bribery payments from the Bush-CIA Crime Syndicate, in exchange for their ‘solidarity’ in blocking the releases.

All of which, of course, PROVES that President Obama has been operating as George H. W. Bush’s corrupt poodle, carrying out his instructions to continue the sabotage and blocking of the payouts. Which is precisely what he did at 2:36 p.m. EDT on Thursday 20th May.

• UPDATE. 25th May: The Daily Telegraph reproduces the deliberately diversionary spin report referenced above, on page 15 of the London edition, in an article entitled: ‘US spy chief ‘was forced to quit in row over France”. Thus we have confirmation that The Daily Telegraph newspaper is apt to reproduce American official diversionary propaganda and gross distortions of the truth without investigating what lies behind them. This example also manifestly demonstrates that The Daily Telegraph doesn’t bother to read our reports. The intelligence cell resident in the Press Room (as in all key Press Rooms on both sides of the Atlantic) no doubt sees to it that this never happens.

• By contrast, we have a report from Shanghai confirming that our reports are now accessible throughout China with no impediments whatsoever, whereas a year or so ago they were only accessible in the main international hotels.

BIDEN TOLD WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF HE DOESN’T CEASE AND DESIST
It was made clear last week to Vice President Joseph Biden that if he continued with his sabotage, he would cease to be vertical in short order.

• UPDATE. 25th May: There are reports that the motorcades of both Vice President Joseph Biden and the former President William Jefferson Rockefeller-Clinton have recently been involved in accidents. Clinton’s van was hit on 24th May while he was en route to Yale to deliver a speech in which he decried the ‘birthers’ attacking Obama. Biden’s motorcade was involved in yet another accident a couple of weeks ago. We should have twigged, when reporting the earlier incidents of Biden’s road transportation being involved in accidents, that these episodes represent warnings of much worse to follow: viz. signals to the Veep (and Clinton) to cease and desist their sabotage.

It is also believed that a similar message was conveyed to President Barack Obama, although our intelligence on Biden is firmer. Close observers of ours have confirmed that, appearing in public, Biden appeared to be ‘visibly disturbed’. As well he might be.

Separately, the focus on France contained in The New York Times’ report was appropriate on purpose, indicating where a serious problem had arisen, but carefully not dealing with the actual issue – namely a French fraud associated with the releases, believed to have involved Pearce and the Bush CIA operative based in Dallas who was in touch with us for two and a half years until last January, when we basically outed him.

According to our latest information, these two veteran operatives were arrested. At all events, we are advised that ‘the French fraud has been dealt with’ – a major step forward, as we now know that the Dallas-based operative was spying on us on behalf of the Bush Financial Crime apparat all that time. There are unconfirmed hints that the aforementioned fraudsters were horizontalised.

OBAMA’S LIES TO THE HIGHEST BRITISH AUTHORITY EXPOSED
Although we cannot go into much detail, on Friday evening 21st May (or at the latest, Saturday morning) copies of the letters from Mr A. Clifton Hodges copied to us here and displayed in the preceding report were received at the highest level through our intermediary, addressed to the most senior official serving the Monarchy.

Combined with the package of materials that had been delivered by the same means on the morning of Gordon Brown’s resignation (see again below), the highest level in London now realised that the Obama White House had lied to them.

This will also have become apparent to the MI6 officers who thought last week (as we reported earlier) that everything was ready to go: which information, as we stated, was erroneous. It appears that the MI6 (MI9?) officers concerned realised, with our publication of Mr Hodges’ letters to the President, that they, along with the Palace, had indeed been lied to.

We understand that the beneficial equivalent of all hell breaking loose then ensued on Saturday.

UPDATE, 25th May: THE SARAH FERUGSON EPISODE:
ANOTHER OPERATION AGAINST THE BRITISH MONARCHY
In the past, we have briefly alluded to an operation run by the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) some time ago, in which a 24-year-old Italian-American was exposed as involved with one of Prince Andrew’s daughters while still a child. We commented that this represented a despicable covert US intelligence thrust to destabilise the Monarchy (one of many such ongoing underhand initiatives by the US Intelligence Power), by taking advantage of the dysfunctional state of affairs surrounding Prince Andrew and his former naive and guile-less wife.

The latest unfortunate episode involving Sarah Ferguson is another chapter in this sequence, albeit transacted by The News of the World, a dirty, scrurrilous Sunday newspaper owned by the dirty, scurrilous media mogul Rupert Murdoch, using a reporter of Pakistani origin, please note.

One dimension of the latest episode is that Prince Andrew has struck up close connections with the former Khazakh Communist Party Boss, Nursultan Nazarbayev, who is engaged in building a monstrous city largely designed by the pagan British architect Sir Norman Foster, which features a significant number of geomasonic buildings, including a colossal pryamid containing in-your-face masonic symbolism, and two buildings mimicking Jachin and Boaz, the pillars in Solomon’s Temple.

Nazarbayev glided seamlessly into the Bush Crime Syndicate orbit and has been photographed with George W. Bush, the implication being that the upgraded city being constructed with Khazakh energy and uranium wealth is intended to represent one of George Bush Sr.’s ‘thousand points of light’, meaning cities dedicated exclusively to the darkness. This is confirmed by the fact that Mr Nazarbayev changed the city’s name to Astana, being an anagram of the Russian for Satan, satana.

So the latest Fergie episode can be seen in this context to be yet another operation, handled via cutouts, to destabilise the Monarchy but in particular to discredit Prince Andrew, whose work has made serious inroads into a bailiwick that the Bush Crime Family thought they had all wrapped up.

The forthcoming issue of our intelligence publication Soviet Analyst has a detailed exposure of Astana and how Nazarbayev is squandering Kazakh wealth on sterile geomasonic power symbols.

THE CURSE OF STORY
At the top of our report dated 11th May 2010, we revealed (see also above) that US Vice President Joseph Biden, US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, and Rahm Emanuel, the White House Chief of Staff, are/were in receipt of weekly and monthly bribery cheques in exchange for their continued assistance to the Bush-CIA ‘Black’ apparat in blocking the releases which the White House has hijacked under both the Bush II and the Obama régimes.

As usual, and in accordance with their confusion-mongering and disinformation instructions, the flaky US websites magnifying the unprovenanced opinions of anonymous bloggers and thereby serving the obfuscation interests of the ‘Black’ apparat by specialising in maximising the fog of confusion to help protect the US kleptocracy from exposure (while maintaining an opposite self-righteous stance) ran off at once down rabbit holes with the historical Fritz Kraemer information, disregarding the sensational revelation concerning these highest-level bribees.

This is typical of these professional confusion-mongers: they are trained to pick up peripheral data and thereby to obfuscate the central issues that have been exposed. It’s called ‘redirection’.

Notwithstanding this typical ‘Black’ response, the curse of Story descended upon both the Bush and the Biden families with a vengeance following that posting. Specifically:

• Vice President Joseph Biden’s son Beau, Attorney General of Delaware, collapsed on the same day that we posted the revelation about Vice President Biden’s acceptance of these Bushbribes. One can speculate that the shock of learning that his father was at the receiving end of Payola – and more to the point, knowing how these people think, that this scandalous state of affairs had been exposed – may have been too much for the Delaware Attorney General, not least given his official status. After all, as we pointed out, and as every American schoolboy knows, acceptance of bribes while holding high office is an IMPEACHABLE OFFENCE. It remains to be seen whether what remains of the emasculated US Rule of Law kicks in here, or whether the preference will yet again be to brush this abomination under the filthy carpet at the Veep’s official residence.

• On 18th May, the brother of George H. W. Bush – William H. T. Bush, aged 71 – collapsed during an Annual Meeting of health insurer WellPoint Inc., held naturally in Indianapolis, thus bringing an abrupt end to a noisy meeting of discontented shareholders.

William Bush was transferred to the Methodist Hospital in Indianapolis. According to the de facto US State Information Agency, Associated Press, he was enduring a question-and-answer session with other directors when he moaned and leaned over to his right side.

Officials seized the opportunity to clear the room, leaving disident shareholders bewildered. The Associated Press report elaborated that ‘The insurer has received strong criticism from the Obama Administration and others for planning rate hikes of 25% or more for some of its customers. Several company critics attended the meeting’.

It is of course standard US intelligence practice to ‘check into hospital’ whenever the going gets rough, so it may be the case that this was a device to get the meeting closed down. However the circumstances strongly suggest otherwise. It will be recalled that Mr Biden’s ‘Black’ predecessor, former Vice President Richard B. Cheney, whom we believe to be ‘perfectly possessed’, was in the habit, from time to time, of checking into the hospital at the casualty entrance, and, after a polite interval, stepping into his limousine from a back exit from the hospital.

CHENEY’S ATTEMPT TO STEAL $2.0 TRILLION FROM BoA, ATLANTA
As reported here on 21st May, this same CIA criminal operative, former Vice President Richard B. Cheney, accompanied by Carlyle Group executives and thugs, appeared late on Wednesday 19th May at Bank of America, Atlanta, and attempted to steal $2.0 trillion from the funds allocated for the releases. Since precisely such a move had been anticipated by the Gold Badge Signatory (whose identity is revealed in Mr A. Clifton Hodges’ letters posted by us on 21st May), they were caught in flagrante and physically ejected from the bank.

These criminal thugs should have been cuffed and thrown face-down into the back of an armoured police van, and removed for immediate incarceration sine die pending indictment for attempted bank robbery. There is no indication as to whether such a sequel materialised, which is why we castigated the American law enforcement authorities as weaklings and cowards.

UPDATE, 25th May: CHENEY ET AL THEN TRIED TO CASH BOGUS CERTIFICATES IN PARIS
It transpires that Cheney, the Carlyle executives et al first tried to cash bogus gold certificates for $2.0 trillion at Bank of America, Atlanta. Then, over the weekend of 21st-22nd May, they attempted to cash the bogus gold certificates in Paris (‘the French fraud’). This operation failed, as well.

• What this demonstrates is that the official US criminalists are now DESPERATE, and essentially that ‘it’s over’. They have been exposed and caught in flagrante. Their entire edifice of corrupt operations is collapsing. These developments are of exceptional importance for the future.

CRIMINAL CIA OPERATIVE CHENEY WALKS AWAY FROM HIS ATTEMPTED BANK ROBBERY.
A BRIT GETS THREE MONTHS AND DEPORTATION FOR A MINOR TRAFFIC INFRACTION.
By contrast, a British contact of the Editor’s who had been resident for some time in the United States, reported to us on 22nd May, that, earlier this year, he was arrested and then jailed for three months for a minor traffic infringement.

On being released from the US Gulag, he was deported to Britain. This case illustrates the extreme skewing of the Rule of Law in the United States, which on the one hand allows notorious financial criminals like Mr Cheney to retire with apparent impunity from their latest attempt to rob Bank of America of $2.0 trillion on behalf of the Bush-CIA Crime Syndicate, while on the other hand jailing a Briton for three months for a minor traffic infringement, followed by deportation.

WHY DID THE CIA’S BANK PHYSICALLY EJECT CHENEY ET AL?
You way well ask: why were Cheney and his henchmen physically ejected from the bank, given that Bank of America is the CIA’s primary tame institution, and given further that the Director of Central Intelligence, Leon Panetta, has remained himself, as we have reported, engaged in the systematic blocking of the settlements (playing the familiar cynical game of shuttlecock with Mr Geithner and President Obama, each blaming the others, so that no progress is made – exactly the same tactics that were routinely used by Paulson, Cheney, Chertoff and the other odious scum of the earth that controlled the US structures under the corrupt President George W. Bush).

The question can only be answered generically. Inside a sack, rats attack other rats. Jealousy and hatred prevail and the thieves turn on each other. In the Atlanta context, it will be recalled that we have reported that further waves of bankers have been arrested since March, so one assumes that the bank officers at Bank of America, Atlanta, knew this and sensibly, for once, refused to go along with the Cheney-Carlyle heist on behalf of the Bush-CIA Crime Syndicate. Additionally, since the intended bank robbery was anticipated and the monies were heavily ‘marked’ electronically, the bank officers concerned would themselves have been thrown into jail or extradited to Europe by INTERPOL had they accommodated such an outrage.

More to the point, as the BoA heist was correctly anticipated, the intention may have been to catch these crooks in flagrante so that they can be arrested and indicted later. Americans and the whole world are crying out for the likes of Mr Cheney to be physically arrested in front of the world’s TV cameras. US associates of ours call for a much messier display to be televised, as we mentioned in the report dated 11th May 2010.

It is just (but only just) possible that what is preventing this from happening is a fear that such a display would publicise the depths of US decay, decadence and degradation – whereas the reality is that the televised arrest of a mastercrook like Cheneyscum would, on the contrary, immediately restore a degree of both domestic and external confidence that the American Republic can save itself from being completely destroyed by this corruption. But don’t ‘bank’ on it.

THE WORLD FELL APART WHILE THE CROOKS CONTINUED STEALING
As you can see, the whole world has been falling apart, with stock markets lending new meaning to the word ‘toilet’ – and yet these serial US criminals have continued to stonewall, bribe, hijack, lie, whine, writhe and wriggle their way as though there was no crisis and they were simply engaged in their usual non-stop scamming and stealing operations. (Remember, however, that what we report, though almost ‘real-time’, is in fact historical. Consider carefully what has just been said here).

Their objective is to stop the Dollar Refunding operation at all costs, out of jealousy and fear of ‘losing control’ (which is happening anyway) while repeatedly seeking to steal as much of the underlying real money they can grab hold of – just as happened in the Soviet Union from 1991 onwards. The very latest failed attempt at stealing funds was the thwarted ‘French fraud’.

• The fact that the finances of the world are crumbling daily before the crooks’ shaded eyes is of no concern whatsoever to these criminals.

They have been trying every ruse under the sun to steal real funds from the release monies: and of course we have only been able to report a few of these operations: the crass attempt to divert the funds via the serial thief and felon Wanta, Bush Sr.’s scamming facilitator and former courier, into a fake ‘virtual’ Central Bank of the non-existent Principality of Snake Hill, but in actual fact via the French Embassy thanks to the former French Ambassador to the United States, M. Levitte, who is now President Sarkozy’s top intelligence adviser. M. Sarkozy’s half-brother, ‘Oliver’ Sarkozy, is a senior executive with the Carlyle Group which sent executives with Cheney on the evening of 19th May to try to relieve Bank of America, Atlanta, of $2.0 trillion of the release funds.

Then there was the equally crass imposition of the Biden-linked Mafioso Salvatore R. DeFrancesco as ‘secretary’ on the complicit Pennsylvania Department of State Corporation Bureau’s screen for Pennsylvania Investments Inc., which we exposed and which resulted in the Gold Badge Signatory having to acquire bodyguards day and night.

Next, the CIA leaked a ‘fatwah’ against the Gold Badge Signatory, namely a formal execution order – a factor that may have emboldened that blockhead Cheney into assuming that he could safely risk the attempted heist at the Bank of America, Atlanta. Whether the leaking of this information formed part of a smokescreen generated by the Intelligence Power to sow further confusion, as we later surmised, has not really been clarified.

CRISIS AND CURE ARE EXCLUSIVELY RESULTS OF THE CRIMINALITY EXPOSURES
Yet despite all this (and the years of reportage on this crisis that preceded it), as you can also see, the dumb so-called ‘mainstream’ media have STILL not understood that the crisis is EXCLUSIVELY A CONSEQUENCE of the exposure of the endless financial criminality of the organised criminals who have long since hijacked and remain in charge of the US Government and structures.

• President Obama’s words are always smooth: but it is by his actions, or lack of action, that he is to be judged. And on that criterion, he has set himself up as simply yet another Bush-worshipping Financial Terrorist wearing the familiar garb of President of the United States.

Just how deep this culture of open-ended, unrestrained criminality has penetrated the American structures more generally, is confirmed, for instance, by reports of the free-wheeling operations of the Church of Satan inside the US military, which is said to be ignorant of, and indifferent to, the extreme dangers of the esoteric rituals and practices now prevalent in its ranks. One military wife has reported in detail on the satanic rituals her husband had to go through in order to secure advancement. In other words, he had to sell his soul to Satan if he wanted to continue his career.

Although this is simply indicative of the evil and corruption that has overwhelmed the US structures like a ghastly avalanche of sewage, any Government that thinks it’s OK to invade another country (Iraq) using depleted uranium shells, is manifestly bound to Satan anyway.

Iraqi doctors are reported to be outraged that cancer is spreading throughout the Iraqi population. Cancer rates in the Province of Babil have risen almost tenfold in just three years. Specifically, in 2004, 500 cancer cases were diagnosed there. Two years later, the figure had risen to 1,000. By 2008, the number of cancer cases in Babil Province had soared to 7,000.

• The situation there is now believed to be completely out of control.

The stupid British military, which goes along with US military abominations, or has done hitherto, reportedly also allows Satanists to practice their ‘religion’ inside its ranks. It is likewise complicit in the use of weapons of mass destruction, which is what depleted uranium shells undoubtedly are.

AS MI6 HAS JUST DISCOVERED, THE WHITE HOUSE LIES TO EVERYONE, EVEN THE QUEEN
The point of all this is that given the extreme darkness that has long since descended upon the Beltway and beyond, anyone (especially laid-back British intelligence cadres) who imagines that undertakings given by ANY component of the US structures can be relied upon, is in urgent need of brain surgery. As reported in our 21st May item, ‘London’ was telling its Stateside contacts on 20th May 2010 that everything was in order for the distribution – an assessment which was 100% inaccurate, indicating either that these people are not up to speed, or that they remain under the delusion that US official undertakings have meaning. They don’t. American official honour has been decimated by these organised criminals, and the sooner the complacent and opinionated British establishment recognises this basic reality, the better.

• They have now understood that they were lied to by the White House and the CIA.

Certainly, British officials do no service to The Queen by buying into the latest batch of lies spewed out by their corrupt American counterparts. If MI6 officers were in fact themselves lying, this would indicate that the gut-rot from the other side of the Atlantic is corroding their mental facilities, too.

Interestingly, when we put this possibility to a knowledgeable US source, he responded; ‘It doesn’t matter if they were lying. So what? The crisis is so out in the open now (among those ‘in the know’) that any lies are exposed almost the moment they are perpetrated’. True!

Our old rule of thumb – that public lies, like plutonium, have a half-life, and that their average life expectancy is seven years – appears no longer to be valid in this context. On the contrary, in the prevailing escalating chaos, an official lie is liable to be seen to be a lie – making it much harder for inveterate intelligence liars to get away with whatever dirty tricks they were trying to perpetrate.

THE CURSE OF GEORGE H. W. BUSH AND THE ‘EUROPEAN CRISIS’
George H. W. Bush’s dirty finger marks are to be found all over the ‘European crisis’ – up to and including, of course, the ‘French fraud’ that has just been stifled (see above) – arising from the free-wheeling Fraudulent Finance involving securitisation, which is illegal.

This is because, as previously revealed by this service, Citibank, based in Athens, handled counterparty derivatives transactions with elements of the Bush-Cheney Fraudulent Finance cadres, accumulating a vast portfolio of completely worthless ‘Trashets’ for which ‘good’ money (i.e. Euros) had been exchanged.

Like all derivatives transactions and trading contracts applicable under US law and in Common Law countries, all contracts entered into for an illegal purpose are by definition null and void – which means that more or less the entire universe of such derivatives transactions are in fact void, and can be challenged in court – a state of affairs that hasn’t arisen yet, since every residual party to this scamfest is hoping that such a meltdown can somehow be avoided.

But that is the ‘bottom line’: and even the bewildered organised criminal strategists know that the vast accruals that they have stashed offshore are intrinsically worthless, since they can no longer reveal ‘source of funds’ as required under the Basle banking requirements, without compromising themselves and facing inter alia charges of tax evasion.

This is because not only are these ‘earnings’ illegitimate, having involved inter alia tax evasion, but they are derived from contracts that are null and void because they were entered into for a criminal purpose. The Bush-CIA criminalist designers of these scams sought to export their Fraudulent Finance operations precisely because they are wholly illegal in the United States – whereas the participation, for instance, of corrupt Greek bankers at Citibank supposedly lent such illegal transactions ‘50% legitimacy’. We can now see where this careless assumption has led.

CITIBANK, ATHENS: LOCUS OF WANTA’S BUSH SR. ACCOUNTS
Citibank, Athens, was the locus of accounts set up by Bush’s former courier, the dual-named Lee/Leo Wanta – that Bush-protected criminal operative and scam-master, who stole a bona fide loan that got his probation shortened by five years and two weeks with the aid of his co-conspiring CIA Attorney, Steven Goodwin, of Richmond, VA.

In other words, instead of running a country, the previous Greek Government preferred instead (like Bush’s partners in Iceland, Ireland and elsewhere) to run a huge Ponzi scheme – squandering the nation’s liquid currency resources in exchange for what has turned out to be minus zilch.

GERMAN BANKS SCAMMED BY BUSH, WHEREAS STOLEN BUSH
AND GORBACHEV PROCEEDS ARE STASHED IN ST GALLEN, SWITZERLAND
Now the important point here is that Germany, Bush Senior’s closest collaborator, is in the same boat in this respect as Greece: its big banks (Deutsche Bank, Commerzbank, Dresdner Bank) are reportedly stuffed to the gills with worthless ‘Trashets’, given not least that Frau Angela Merkel – the former Secretary of the Agitation and Propaganda Department of the Young Communists at Marx-Lenin University, in case you had forgotten – has been acting as Bush Senior’s ‘gatekeeper’ in Germany, a.k.a. agent supervising the Bush Crime Family’s business in German institutions.

It appears, though, that the tangible fraudulent Bushwealth has been stashed in Deutsche AG, formerly Barrington Investment Group, of which the partners are, also in case you had forgotten:

• George H. W. Bush, former President of the United States.

• Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachëv (Orbach), former President of the Soviet Union and before that, head of the all-powerful CPSU Administrative Department, which rôle he has long since resumed, operating from a large wing in the Kremlin.

Gorbachëv’s version of the World Revolution is in full swing, and the ignorance of many Americans on this score (we have been told that the new generation can’t even remember who Mr Gorbachëv was) is intolerable. Gorbachëv is BEHIND THIS MESS: wake up!

• Dr Helmut Kohl, former Chancellor of Germany, whose unsavoury ‘Black’ background has been partially re-exposed by this service.

• Dr Josef Ackermann, CEO of Deutsche Bank AG.

BEHIND AGITPROP SECRETARY MERKEL’S ‘EURO IN DANGER’ PLOY
Bush’s agent and former Communist agitprop operative (STASI), Frau Merkel, has made what the British would call ‘a right pig’s ear’ of the ‘Euro crisis’ arising EXCLUSIVELY as a consequence of Germany’s own self-indulgence in Fraudulent Finance transactions, replicated inter alia in Greece.

• Essentially, the Germans have been caught at their own corrupt game: and they are in a panic. Equally panicked are the French, who allowed Banque Paribas to accumulate over 3,000 Bush Sr.-linked accounts, handled by Barbara Bush’s Pearce relative.

As we pointed out earlier, the Germans care not a Greek iota for the plight of Greece. No. What concerns the STASI operative at the top in Germany is the prospect of the COLLAPSE OF THE GERMAN HEGEMONY PROJECT.

• Specifically, Frau Merkel told the Bundestag on 19th May 2010:

‘This challenge is existential and we have to rise to it. The Euro is in danger. If we don’t deal with this danger, then the consequences for Europe are incalculable’.

‘If the Euro fails, then Europe fails’..

However what the former Communist agitprop secretary failed to remind the Bundestag was that sober observers had warned right through the 1990s and especially in 1998 that the attempt by Germany to impose ‘irrevocable exchange rates’ (as provided for under the Maastricht Treaty) on ancient economies which had developed quite separately from Germany, would end in disaster as soon as a really serious ‘shock’ – such as has occurred following ‘Greece’ – materialised.

For instance, we ourselves incurred much unpopularity from the likes of the Bank of England and the brainwashed National Bank of Belgium for warning, in successive articles that we published in International Currency Review, that the EU’s Collective (Common) Currency System contained the glaringly obvious seeds of its own destruction.

In those days, no-one took the slightest notice, and most observers thought we were nuts. Peter Jay, the former British Ambassador to Washington, published an article which drove home our points, but that made no difference either.

So the blatant hand-wringing, pleading for mercy, Teutonic reactions and other predictable and cowardly displays of a growing realisation that the whole confounded pan-German ‘European project’ is indeed doomed to failure, cuts no ice whatsoever in this office.

On the contrary, the perpetrators of this foolish and arrogant scheme are facing what we predicted they would ultimately face: the collapse of their hegemony project, followed by the chaos that Frau Merkel fears. Once again, the Germans, as is their wont, have overplayed their hand.

FORMER BUNDESBANK PRESIDENT DID NOT DENY IN 1998 THAT GERMANY
MAY HAVE HOARDED DEUTSCHEMARKS IN ANTICIPATION OF THE EURO COLLAPSING
Not that Germany itself failed to anticipate such an outcome. On the contrary, as we have also reported on several occasions, the former President of the Bundesbank, Dr Hans Tietmeyer – now running the super-corrupt Vatican Bank on behalf of his German Jewish Papal Master, and looking after the Bush-related accruals held there – refused to answer a key question put to him at a press conference attended by one of our colleagues in 1998. The question was this (paraphrase):

‘Dr Tietmeyer, has the Bundesbank taken the precaution of printing and storing adequate supplies of Deutschemarks for distribution should the Euro system disintegrate in the future?’

As indicated, Dr Tietmeyer did not pooh-pooh this question. He didn’t deny that the Bundesbank had taken such a sensible precaution. He just refused to answer the question. The implication is that the Bundesbank has adequate supplies of deutschemarks in stock for the eventuality finally acknowledged by Frau Merkel, which could be distribuited very quickly.

GREECE SHOULD HAVE TURNED DOWN
THE GERMAN MONEY AND RESTORED THE DRACHMA
So, reverting to Frau Merkel’s statement that ‘the Euro is in danger’, the critical point underlying this observation is as follows. Germany has provided a substantial sum of ‘good’ money in loans to help ‘bail out’ Greece (on a temporary basis). Which means that Greece has to pay this money back with interest (somehow).

If Greece were to extract itself suddenly from the Collective Currency, its replacement drachma would naturally be sharply devalued against the Euro – which would leave Greece in an even worse situation, as it would have to repay the Euro-denominated loans with devalued drachmae.

Which means as follows:

• Number One: Greece is caught and can never get out of its bind, short of its entire external debt being written off. Presumably Frau A. Merkel took the risk that, in order to ‘save’ the pan-German hegemony project, the funds allocated for Greece would ultimately be lost: in which case language is not available to describe the cynicism of this move.

• Germany, having reacted in knee-jerk fashion in order to ‘protect the Euro’ has realised that, as Angela Merkel has pronounced, ‘the Euro is indeed in danger’ because Greece’s situation (to be replicated in Portugal, Spain, and Italy, for starters) is now irretrievable.

• The Greeks should have got out of the Collective Currency system straight away, turning down the German loan. A de facto default would be a better option than where they are now.

BUT THERE IS ANOTHER DIMENSION WHICH, DESPITE WHAT WE HAVE PUBLISHED, HAS SO FAR BEEN COMPLETELY OVERLOOKED. CONTRACTS ENTERED INTO FOR AN ILLEGAL PURPOSE ARE NULL AND VOID. Therefore, what the Greeks should have done, if they had had their wits about them, was to declare all the fraudulent transactions conducted mainly through Citibank, Athens, VOID, thereby cancelling the fraudulent debts unilaterally, which they are entitled to do on this basis.

By repudiating the fraudulent debt on this sound legal basis and specifically making it clear that the underlying contracts, entered into under the previous Greek Government, are VOID, they would perform two key functions: first, they would ‘get out from under’; and secondly, they would hasten the total collapse of the entire fraudulent derivatives sector, which is happening anyway, doing us all a favour. By acknowledging the validity of the debts, the Greeks have made a fatal mistake. All those debts are null and void because the underlying contracts were entered into for an illegal purpose. Surely there are lawyers in Greece capable of understanding this.

Even at this late stage, the Greeks should repudiate the debts on this sound legal basis, and send the foreign and German money back with a note saying:

‘Thanks, but on second thoughts. no thanks’.

U.S. SENATE BLOCKS IMF PAYMENTS TO DEBT SPIRAL COUNTRIES
On top of all this, the US Senate voted 94-0 during the week ending 21st May 2010 to preclude the International Monetary Fund from deploying funds to countries (such as Greece) that are trapped in a debt spiral. Since the IMF is effectively these days just a branch of the White House, this could prevent the IMF from providing its own component of the grandiose European bail-out package trumpeted in the preceding week by the Europeans – a tranche amounting to about one-third of the total bail-out aggregate of about $1.0 trillion.

The stupid Brussels and Berlin apparatchiks, whose product is always ‘more regulation’, imagine that the way out of this intractable mess of their own willful bureaucratic making is more and more regulation, supervision of national budgets before presentation to national legislatures, and like administrative measures which do not relate in any way to market pressures. Their delusions will quickly be exposed, and the universal expectation is for a rapid descent into fragmentation.

The European Union Collective is by definition so bureaucratic and cumbersome that it cannot in reality coexist with modern electronic financial markets at all. That’s why the Euro is doomed.

PAN-GERMAN POLITICAL HEGEMONY PROJECT UNRAVELLING
In other words, the German geopolitical hegemony project that was elaborated by the Hitler Nazi élite in 1942, and promulgated via ‘Europäishe Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft’ (European Economic Community), released in Berlin in 1942 by publishers Haude & Spenersche Verlagsbuchhandlung Max Paschke, one copy of which is held by the British Library and another at the Staatsbiblithek, Berlin, is poised to fall apart at last.

• The chapter headings of this Nazi tome correspond almost precisely to the main headings of the Maastricht Treaty, indicating an unbroken continuity of strategic thinking and intent on the part of the long-range pan-German planning intelligentsia, which the STASI agent Merkel serves.

In response to this realisation, Frau Merkel and the Brussels gravy-train apparat, headed by Herman Van Rompuy, President of the European Council (who owes his position to a concerted operation by France and Germany to block the candidacy of Tony Blair), are attempting in vain to leverage the imminent ‘catastrophe’ to their advantage – stressing the ‘need’ for revisions of the Lisbon Treaty to lock further tight restrictions into the system so that Germany and its ever more fractious ‘partner for all eternity’ (as under the January 1963 Treaty of the Elysée), France, can somehow ‘impose discipline’ on the recalcitrant peripheral EU ‘Member States’ – conveniently forgetting that France and Germany are both in grave breach of the rules generally, and of the requirements of the EU’s so-called ‘Stability and Growth Pact’ in particular.

Underlying all this is the ridiculous Teutonic and, it has to be said, revolutionary Talmudic, notion that every facet of economic, social and political life can be ‘regulated’. Regulation is the essence not only of Talmudic thinking, but also of its product, Communism.

On the face of it, it would appear that those of us who have opposed this German Euro-trap from the outset, and whose lives have been wasted trying to do our best to derail it, may find that we won’t need to do much more – as the chances of it collapsing from within can even be seen to be high by brainwashed EUdolaters themselves.

• They chose to disregard the warnings proffered by this service and others: so, as far as we are concerned, they are faced with the consequences of their own stupidity.

Various UK journalists are panicking that a collapse of the Euro will severely affect Britain, on the basis that 50% of UK exports are delivered to the Eurozone. This statement is inaccurate, as the proportion of UK exports is skewed by long-standing fiddling of British energy data and other factors. British exports to the Eurozone will continue with the restoration of national currencies, amid a likely regional competitive devaluation environment.

9/11: MORE DOCUMENTED ‘SMOKING GUN’ INTELLIGENCE
It may be recalled that we have previously cited two sources of intelligence indicating that the 9/11 atrocities – in which 12,000 people died in the Twin Towers demolition operations alone, not the officially estimated 3,000 – were known about well in advance of the ‘Reichstag Fire’ event.

Specifically:

• Both here and more extensively in our publication Soviet Analyst, we have long since exposed the ‘Prison Letter’ scrawled by the since incarcerated Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) Lieutenant Delmart ‘Mark’ Vreeland, dated June 2001. He identified the intention and summarised the official policy as ‘LET ONE HAPPEN. STOP THE REST!!!’.

In March 2005, the Pentagon-linked operative Demchuk (a.k.a. Walker) informed the Editor of this service that ‘Vreeland is in solitary confinement for a very long time, his case is sealed, and he’s no longer a threat to you’ – which was nice to know, as Vreeland had threatened the Editor with death in May 2003 after the Editor had refused to carry out his ‘instructions’ to disembark from a train from Niagara Falls en route to New York City, after we had interviewed him in Niagara Falls (Canada).

• During that experience, Vreeland scammed the Editor’s VISA card of the equivalent of £1,600, having apparently read the numbers of the card upside down when the Editor was paying the hotel bill in Niagara Falls after two days of interviews with this Illuminati split ONI personality.

Delmart E. Vreeland (his correct name) was arrested in October 2004 after trying to scam a gas station by means of Credit Card fraud. On 22nd October 2008, he was sentenced on 12 counts under case Number 04CR706 and as of March 2010, his ‘Current Facility Assignment’ was Buena Vista Correctional Complex, run by the Colorado Department of Corrections, DOC Number 143539. As he is known to have opened one diplomatic bag that he had couriered from Moscow (treason), no doubt one of the counts covered that offence, although paedophilia was also involved. His estimated parole eligibility date is 2nd March 2100.

• We have revealed that one reason the dual-named operative Lee/Leo Wanta, Bush Sr.’s courier, was held in jail was that he knew about the impending 9/11 ‘Reichstag Fire’ operation, and there was concern that his disaffection at the way he had been treated under both Clinton and Bush II, might lead him to expose the conspiracy. About ten days after 9/11, all of a sudden, Mr Wanta was miraculously released, and was collected from jail by the AUSTRIAN Gerald Salchert and taken to a family residence in Wisconsin.

Now, a document has surfaced which clearly reveals that certain US cadres KNEW ABOUT 9/11 IN ADVANCE. The document in question, dated December 2001 (but see below) was entitled:

‘Homeland Defense and the Transportation Industry:
The Civil Aviation and Surface Transportation Sectors’.

‘A report on a seminar-workshop on Homeland Defense held in Denver, Colorado on October 30, 2001, sponsored by the Denver Council on Foreign Relations (DCFR), the Inter-University Seminar on Armed Forces and Society (IUS), Rocky Mountain Region, the Intermodal Transportation Institute (ITI) at the University of Denver (DU), and the Institute on Globalization and Security (IGLOS) at DU’s Graduate School of International Studies’.

• Additional information displayed on the cover of the report:

‘This report was prepared by Greg Moore with the earlier help
of colleague rapporteurs at the University of Denver, Graduate
School of International Studies: Michael Opheim and Martin Wayne’.

Denver Council on Foreign Relations
denvercouncil@hotmail.com

On page 4 of this document is found the following sentence:

‘In the last meeting (May 2001), participants discussed Washington and New York
as the most likely targets, even discussing a scenario in which a plane is hijacked
and crashed into a high-value target’.

So, the Council on Foreign Relations knew, in May 2001:

• The exact two cities that would be attacked.

• The exact method of attack.

• The precise type of target that would be attacked.

It would be interesting to know whether any of the participants that that meeting had heard of Misprision of Felony. Certainly Mr Wanta, who was all for us promoting Misprision of Felony to buttress his false case before he performed the usual ‘switch’ twin of the ‘bait’ trap on us, has heard of it. He could be jailed on that single count – leaving aside his Fraud in the Inducement vulnerabilities, including the fraudulent loan arrangements that he concocted with his corrupt CIA lawyer Steven Goodwin, of Richmond, VA (born in Düsseldorf) to defraud the Editor of this service of his $35,000 loan plus interest, and his theft of those and other funds.

REPORT FROM LONDON: ‘NICK, NICK, THE QUEEN EXPECTS ME TO GO’
The new British Government has one advantage: it isn’t the corrupt Brown Government. The Conservative-Liberal Coalition exists not only because the post-election mathematics precluded any alternative arrangement, although Brown thought for a time that this was possible; but also because Brown was expected to leave office, not only by the people, but more to the point, by The Queen. Confirmation of this seeped into the public domain in an investigative round-up report published in The Sunday Times on 16th May.

In that report, Brown, having received a message from the Palace on the morning of Tuesday 11th May asking when he would be going to tender his resignation to Her Majesty, is reported to have phoned the Liberal Democrat leader, Nick Clegg, to say:

‘Nick, Nick, I can’t hold on any longer. Nick, I’ve got to go to the Palace. The country expects me to go. The Queen expects me to go. I can’t hold on any longer’.

This information represents what Gordon Brown told Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democratic leader, verbatim, having been reported by a photographer who was allowed into Downing Street to record what were expected to be Brown’s final days in Downing Street.

The Queen expected Brown to go, and he went. As soon as Brown had taken leave of The Queen, the corrupt nexus established between Tony Blair and George W. Bush, and continued by Gordon Brown, disintegrated. This axis had been responsible for sustaining the sabotage of the releases for years, and was the bedrock upon which the arrogant Paulson, Cheney, Geithner and their co-conspiring companions confidently sustained their opposition and constant destabilisation of the releases required under the Basle List restitution arrangements.

DOCUMENTS PREVIOUSLY BLOCKED BY BROWN (ON BEHALF OF GEORGE W. BUSH)
DELIVERED AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL IMMEDIATELY AHEAD OF BROWN’S RESIGNATION
Now earlier on the morning of 11th May, information and documents, under cover of a letter from Mr A. Clifton Hodges, the lawyer representing Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., his US corporation Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., and his London-based corporation Cottrell Securities Limited, had been delivered at the highest level to Buckingham Palace. The package of documents contained covering letters from the Editor of this service addressed to a known official at the Palace dating back 18 months and to June 2009. It is believed that the official may have been contacted to ask whether she had been aware of these documents. When the answer was in the negative, it may have been realised that the previous deliveries had been diverted to Downing Street – Brown’s Downing Street, that is – indicating with crystal clarity that Brown had suppressed the necessary information that had needed to be conveyed to Buckingham Palace. This, therefore, is the main significance of The Sunday Times’ report that Brown told Clegg: ‘The Queen expects me to go’.

• Of course this indicates that Mr Brown may have deliberately frrustrated the resolution of the financial chaos for which his mishandling of the country’s finances was responsible.

NEW UK GOVERNMENT RUSHES TO INGRATIATE ITSELF ABROAD: A SIGN OF WEAKNESS
Almost immediately on taking power, after the formation of the new Cabinet, the Prime Minister and his Foreign Secretary, William Hague, started rushing all over the place to meet other leaders. The first person David Cameron went to see was Alex Salmond, no longer represented in the House of Commons, in Edinburgh. Salmond’s objective in life is to break up the United Kingdom.

Next, Mr Cameron received, on 14th May, the Afghani drug controller, President Hamid Karzai, and posed for press photographs showing him shaking hands with this operative, who had stopped over in London on his way back from Washington. A Downing Street spokesman said that Cameron and Karzai discussed President Karzai’s ‘very successful’ visit to Washington.

WHY HAMID KARZAI CIRCULATED D.C. IN AN ARMOURED ‘CARAVAN’
However a correspondent of ours based inside the Beltway reported to us at 21:02 hours UK time on 14th May 2010 that on Wednesday and Thursday 12th-13th May, Mr Karzai was conveyed around Washington with an immense armed caravan, as large as that employed by the President of the United States (POTUS). Our source stated that :

‘… at one point when trying to cross the 14th Street Bridge yesterday (13th) into DC at about 5 p.m., my friend called me counting 62 cops on motorcycles accompanying 12 vans filled with personnel sitting behind darkened windows, and a couple of marked FBI police cars’. The correspondent added that such activity hadn’t been observed inside the Beltway for some considerable time.

None of this was reported in the satrap American ‘mainstream’ media, so that no deductions from this ‘in-your-face’ display of arrogance have been made. So it’s down to us, as usual. Why is such overt protection necessary? Is it mandatory to have acquired an advanced degree in logic to work out that it is CRIMINALS, ESPECIALLY DRUG DEALERS, THAT NEED PROTECTION – whereas, as a rule, NON-CRIMINALS DON’T? If both parties weren’t up to their necks in organised drug crime, they wouldn’t need protection on this scale when moving around DC, would they?

These people are drug traffickers. As you can see from the completely different state of affairs in Britain, ‘normal’ holders of high office don’t need this exaggerated level of protection. This reality is so glaringly obvious, it’s almost laughable. And yet nobody in the so-called ‘mainstream’ media has highlighted this obvious reality. Of course not: the US ‘mainstream’ media is itself extensively subsidised by dubious sources of Fraudulent Finance.

CAMERON COW-TOWS TO SARKOZY, STANDS UP TO MERKEL
After that, Cameron rushed to Paris to cow-tow to the fractious President of France, Nicolas Sarkozy, whose half-brother ‘Oliver’, is a senior executive with the Carlyle Group, Bush Sr.’s notorious money-laundering enterprise – executives from which accompanied the top CIA crook Richard B. Cheney when he attempted to relieve Bank of America, Atlanta, of $2.0 trillion in the evening of 19th May (see above and the preceding report).

Cameron then repaired to Berlin, to meet the former Secretary of the Agitation and Propaganda Department of the Young Communists at Marx-Lenin University, a.k.a. Bush Sr.’s erstwhile agent, Frau Angie Merkel, in Berlin. There he did at least distinguish himself by countering Frau Merkel’s agitation for yet another collective treaty designed to enable the pan-German Government to claw back its hegemony project from the edge of oblivion.

Specifically, he told Merkel that ‘any treaty – even one that just applied to the Euro area – needs unanimous agreement of all 27 Member States, including the UK which of course has a veto’.

He added that ‘there is no question of agreeing to a treaty that transfers powers from Westminster to Brussels. If there was a treaty that proposed that, obviously it would be subject to a referendum’.

EUROPEANS TOLD THINGS THEY DIDN’T WANT TO HEAR
Meanwhile the new Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, discovered for himself how the European agenda constantly intervenes and confuses the diaries of British Ministers. On 18th May, he had to travel to Brussels, where he was confronted with more arrogant demands by the criminal enterprise European Commission for funds to facilitate a 6% increase in EC spending, which would evidently imply a £600 million increase in Britain’s annual contribution – which, as reiterated below, is completely illegal because the European Commission is a criminal enterprise, and it is a criminal offence for taxpayers’ funds to be remitted into the hands of a criminal enterprise.

Earlier, during the hiatus between the collapse of the Labour Government and the emergence of the peculiar phoenix Coalition, the former Chancellor, Alistair Darling, had refused to sign up to the European ‘support fund’ on the perfectly proper grounds that the Brown Government had lost the election, so that caretaker Ministers had no powers whatsoever other than the handling of very low-level, routine administrative matters.

Deliberately missing the point here, this ‘defiance’ was met with an outburst of hostile responses from Britain’s charming ‘partners’ in the European Union Collective, led by France, Sweden, and the Brussels apparat itself. The theme was that the British should not bother asking the European Union Collective for assistance when it runs into irretrievable financial difficulties (indicating, by the way, that Brussels is no more ‘up to speed’ with the Dollar Refunding Programme solution than the British Coalition Government).

A character called Jean-Pierre Jouyet, Chairman of the French Financial Services Authority, pontificated with emphasis on 11th May that only ‘God would help’ Britain, as it had snubbed its Eurozone ‘neighbours’. This nasty piece of work then elaborated:

‘Help yourself and Heaven will help you. If you don’t want to show solidarity with the Eurozone, then let’s see what happens to the United Kingdom’.

Yes, let’s!

MERKEL DEPLOYS HER COMMUNIST EXPERTISE TO PRESS FOR A NEW TREATY
As a former Communist Party (STASI) apparatchik trained in the methodology of Communism, Frau Merkel knows of course the procedure: it is to convene conference after conference, meeting after meeting, and to sponsor document after tedious document, in a never-ending and sterile process of accretion. Every conference sets the timetable for the next conference (something that may not have happened with the Lisbon Treaty, which the Eurocrats imagined would be the last: but the Communist Merkel knows better).

Under the Leninist overt ‘settlement’, with which this Communist STASi apparatchik is familiar, no document was ever sacrosanct, no undertaking to be relied upon. On the contrary, as Lenin taught from the outset, all undertakings with the ‘bourgeoisie’ could be reneged upon at any tick of the clock, with absolute revolutionary impunity.

So now you may understand why the duplicitous behaviour of the US Financial Terrorists holding high office is described by this service is quintessentially Leninist. No undertaking they have ever given, at any stage of the crisis, has been reliable – something that, as noted above and in the preceding report, certain MI6 officers, being of a younger generation, may still not understand.

Leninist operatives go through the motions of negotiating and reaching agreement with ‘the bourgeoisie’ (proxy for their opponents) with the specific, knowing intent of reneging on their undertakings when what Lenin called ‘the correlation of forces’ changes in their favour.

Clearly, David Cameron doesn’t yet understand this, despite his acknowledged brilliance (his Oxford Professor, Vernon Bogdanor, has called him ‘the most brilliant student I ever taught’).

And nor, it seems, does William Hague, the new British Foreign Secretary, who flew straight to Washington into the arms of Mrs Hillary Clinton – who has been closely associated with criminal operations and the blocking of the releases since longer than we can remember.

From his body language, it looked to us as though Hague had no clue about the issues discussed and exposed by this service, i.e. had not been briefed.

COALITION WORKING PARTIALLY IN THE DARK
A similar deduction is permissible from perusal of the various convoluted statements, accords and undertakings vouchsafed to date by the new Coalition Government. A vague expectation of some economic improvement surfaces in some of Cameron’s observations, but the focus is on the truly horrendous condition in which the British financial economy, and the Government’s finances, were left by the outgoing Labour Government.

Now your correspondent has lived long enough to know that every single Labour Government that has been in power in Britain has made an irretrievable dog’s dinner of the country’s finances: so the fact that Brown spent his last six months in office approving irresponsibly permissive spending plans, many opposed by his civil servants, comes as no surprise. All sorts of superfluous contracts were signed during this period which the new Government will find hard to unravel.

When you consider that Brown (and Blair) were directly implicated, in cahoots with the Bush Crime Family and subsequently with the corrupt Obama Administration, in the endless sabotage of the releases – and therefore of the G-7-approved Dollar Refunding Programme using the sovereign loan, which would deliver windfall tax receipts into the British as well as the US Treasuries – you may begin to understand the reckless treachery for which Brown was responsible.

• No wonder he received a phone call from the Palace on the morning of 11th May.

So far, the Coalition Government has been working on the assumption that severe tax increases and public spending cuts are indispendable, without taking account of the windfall accruals that will arrive at the British Treasury once the delayed and hijacked Dollar Refunding Programme gets under way. Our working assumption must be that no-one in the new Cabinet has yet been briefed on the implications of the Dollar Refunding Programme. That may or may not reflect the continued sabotage perpetrated by the corrupt US Financial Terrorists exposed inter alia by this service: which, we repeat, the controlled ‘mainstream’ media on both sides of the Atlantic have continued to ignore – missing huge news stories such as the episode on 19th May when Mr Cheney, Carlyle executives and henchmen were physically ejected from Bank of America, Atlanta.

• If that is not a colossal news story, your correspondent has to be advised what is.

As previously stated here, we don’t care whether the complacent ‘mainstream’ wakes up or not. It’s too late for them to catch up: but the fact that the media have failed to inform their readers of what has been going on behind the scenes represents a gigantic failure by the Fourth Estate which has no doubt exacerbated the ongoing collapse of newspaper circulations.

To recap for a moment. You will recall that in July 2007, we reported that Lord ‘Eddie’ George, the former Governor of the Bank of England, was arrested and briefly jailed. You will also recall that we had reported that Alan Greenspan, the former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, had been arrested, incarcerated for three weeks, and then released. We republished all this information in International Currency Review. Lord George died in April 2009. We did not receive a letter from Lord George’s lawyers, and neither did we hear from Dr Alan Greenspan’s lawyers, either.

Anyone who’s not sitting on their brains should be able to deduce from the foregoing that the reports were accurate, which they were. Earlier this year we learned the actual reason for Lord George’s arrest. He had facilitated the stealing of The Queen’s gold (29th-30th March 2007), which we alone reported, converting the ‘product’ into worthless pieces of paper.

As late as when we were reporting that late night meeting at the Bank of England dated 9th April, which was supposed to have ‘taken care’ of the situation, we were authoritatively informed that this matter had still not been resolved. Although it had been decided to send over massive funds for the releases at that meeting, we later discovered that sensible second thoughts had prevailed and that the funds were not sent over – either because of some Bank of England corruption or glitch or, more probably, because of a consuming lack of trust.

NEW U.K. GOVERNMENT FAILING TO ADDRESS CRUCIAL ISSUES
The new Coalition Government has ignored the following facts:

• That all legislation passed by the Westminster Parliament since 2000 is null and void as the ejection of the hereditary peers was performed illegally: see our report dated 10th April 2010.

• That the continued remittance of Value Added Tax payments to the European Commission is illegal, as the Commission is a criminal enterprise, the annual accounts of which have not been signed off and approved by the Court of Auditors for the past 14 years running. Mr John Craig of the UK Serious Fraud Office has confirmed to a former Member of the European Parliament that it is a criminal offence for taxpayers’ funds to be remitted into the hands of a criminal enterprise. Therefore if the new Government continues this practice it will de facto be engaged in criminal activity: see the Editor’s speech given in London on 31st October 2009:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jug-W-DKcms
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lB18PIYbSYw&;feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJyUKbmBeJs&;feature=related

ANNEX THE VAT TAX REVENUES TO THE TREASURY
The immediate partial solution to the Government’s financial problems is to annexe the taxation accruals which cannot legally be remitted to Brussels (see above) into a special Treasury account. This could be an escrow account for a defined period, during which the British Government would require the European Commission to reverify all its accounts going back 14 years, a process which will need to extract full details of all corrupt procedures leading to the arrest and prosecution of the perpetrators. This laborious task would need to be performed year by year to the satisfaction of the British authorities, and within the stipulated time period.

Failing such a response by the European Commission to the satisfaction of the British authorities, the VAT accruals held in the escrow account should be transferred to the UK Treasury’s general accounts and used to defray and pay off debts incurred by the Coalition’s profligate predecessor.

There is absolutely no indication that anyone in official circles understands the basis and logic of this, which means that the new Coalition Government will be just as prepared as its predecessor to commit criminal offences on a continuing basis by remitting British taxpayers’ funds into the hands of a criminal enterprise. Ministers can be arraigned for such criminal activity.

Meanwhile the Coalition brought forward an extremely feeble agenda which it represented as the compromise agreement, and republished on 20th May (having previously promulgated a different programme). The programme, to have been announced in part in The Queen’s speech on Tuesday 25th May, represents the lowest common denominator and reveals that this is an excessively weak Government – even though headline-catching prospective Bills have been indicated.

VAST, UNSUSTAINABLE COST OF BRITISH E.U. MEMBERSHIP
Indicative of the extreme collective stupidity of the British political and bureaucratic Establishment is the fact that, having delegated General Powers to the European Commission – after the model adopted by Herr Hitler in January 1933 when he prevailed upon the Reichstag to delegate General Powers to his Cabinet, which he then annexed to himself – the huge costs imposed by the corrupt criminal enterprise called the European Commission are actually crippling British business.

When the country is bust, the Government’s finances are in total disarray, and the Government can’t even understand that it is committing an ongoing criminal offence by remitting UK Value Added tax accruals to the Brussels parasites, the colossal burden imposed by this unelected, unaccountable fake EC ‘authority’ represents a calculated insult to normal intelligence.

Specifically, the British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) publishes a ‘Burdens Barometer’, compiled by the London and Manchester Business Schools, using the Government’s own figures. The latest report from this source, released on 23rd May, indicates that the total cost of compliance with the European Commission’s nit-picking regulations to British business over the past 12 years alone has reached £88.3 billion, an increase of more than £11 billion over a year ago, although this is due in part to new information relating to burdens imposed by the European Commission via the British satrap Westminster Parliament in earlier years. During 2009, the additional EC cost exceeded £1.0 billion, consisting of 40 new restrictions.

One of the most expensive of these EC-originated laws is the EU Light Duty Vehicle Emissions Standards, which imposes recurring annual costs on businesses of £1.48 billion. It is to be noted that such penal financial burdens would not ‘fly’ had it not been for the subversive ‘Green agenda’ propaganda, which, as Mr Mikhail S. Gorbachëv predicted, has been one of the most ‘successful’ revolutionary tools ever developed by the World Revolution élite. Gorbachëv basically kicked off the Green agenda when he sat on his backside for three weeks in 1986 after the deliberately provoked Chernobyl disaster, to observe its impact on Western attitudes.

The most expensive burden of all the Talmudic restrictions imposed by the European Commission via the compliant satrap Westminster Parliament since 1998 is reported to be the Working Time Regulations, which have so far cost British businesses £17.8 billion, and also a 2000 EU Pollution Directive, which has cost British businesses £10.4 billion to date.

What infuriates this service is the complacency with which such information is received in British policymaking circles. The message which no-one in the weak Establishment wants to hear is that membership of the European Union Collective has been IMMENSELY DAMAGING for Britain and its economy, and that total independence will yield far more positive results.

Because once Britain has extricated itself at long last from this long-range geopolitical entrapment mechanism, every country in the world will be knocking at Britain’s door asking for a bilateral treaty guaranteeing access to the huge British marketplace. The idiocy of delegating General Powers to an unelected, unaccountable, corrupt criminal enterprise cannot be over-emphasised (and actually is so glaringly obvious that it shouldn’t even need reporting): but the Establishment doesn’t want to know, because of course pointing these grim things out reveals just how stupid, complacent and negligent its cadres have been for decades.

55% RULE REVEALS COALITION’S FEAR IT CANNOT OTHERWISE SURVIVE
That the Coalition lacks confidence in its ability to survive is separately confirmed by the fact that the Coalition intends to proceed with its constitutionally irregular provision that there is to be a dissolution threshold of 55% of the votes in Parliament for a no-confidence motion in the context of previously unheard-of fixed-term parliaments (for five years). [A surreptitious lobbying operation to promote fixed-term parliaments has been infesting Westminster for a long time: so this wheeze is NOT the Coalition’s original notion, but one it has ‘lifted’ to enhance its chances of survival].

Under this format, if the Coalition Government loses a vote of confidence, it then invokes the dissolution provision and because MPs will want to hang on to their seats (not least because the Government is also proposing to redraw constituency boundaries to reduce the number of MPs – another cynical control ‘gimmick’ designed to keep it in power), the dissolution provision fails: which results in what has been described as a ‘zombie government’.

It is glaringly obvious that this ‘belt and braces’ arrangement has been cobbled together precisely because the Coalition partners recognise that they and their supporters remain, in fact, at serious loggerheads over a wide range of issues, and that without such unconstitutional arrangements (which will be rendered ‘constitutional’ by a Commons vote supported by all the new MPs who can’t believe that they were elected), the Coalition would fall apart. Hence, the new Coalition’s bravado represents actually a gross piece of self-serving deception ‘justified’ by the grim arithmetic of the General Election held on 6th May, which, as predicted, resulted in a hung Parliament.

We have already demonstrated that the Conservatives could have secured a working majority (of about 40 seats) had they accommodated the requirements of actives who detest Britain’s sterile relationship with the European Union Collective. Here are the details again, for the record:

Calculations based on votes cast prepared by the former MEP for South-East England, Ashley Mote, have revealed as follows:

• The Conservatives could have had a comfortable working majority if they had made an unequivocal commitment to a referendum on British membership of the EU.

• The UKIP (United Kingdom Independence Party) vote, favouring a much harsher policy towards Britain’s sterile EU participation, would have collapsed and, while not every one of the 25 seats listed below might have been delivered to the ‘Conservatives’, they would have emerged with a working majority of about 40.

In the following table of constituences where the ‘Conservatives’ came second, the first number shown represents the winner’s majority, and the second number shown represents the UKIP vote:

Bolton West 92, 901
Derby North 613, 829
Derbyshire North East 2445, 2636
Dorset Mid 269, 2109
Dudley North 649, 3267
Great Grimsby 714, 2043
Hampstead and Kilburn 42, 408
Hull North 641, 1358
Middlesbrough South 1677, 1881
Morley and Outwood 1101, 1506
Newcastle-Under-Lyme 1552, 3491
Norwich South 310, 1145
Oldham East 103, 1720
Plymouth Moor 1588, 3188
Rochdale 889, 1999
Sheffield Central 165, 652
Solihull 175, 1200
Somerset and Frome 1817, 1932
Southampton and Itchen 192, 1928
St Austell and Newquay 1312, 1757
St Ives South 1719, 2560
Swansea West 504, 716
Walsall North 990, 1737
Walsall South 800, 1711
Wirral South 531, 1274

Additionally, the Conservatives should have won Wells, which was lost to the Liberal Democrats with a majority of 800. But the UKIP vote was 1711; so including the promise of a referendum on Britain’s continued sterile membership of the EU could have secured this seat as well.

The Guardian reported on 8th May 2010 that ‘UKIP’s bid to beat the Speaker’ (who is traditionally unopposed by the main parties) in Buckingham, ended in third place. Lessons for the Conservative right, there, perhaps, if they think they can win by tacking to the extremes’.

But the data displayed above reveal that this assessment is the very reverse of the truth. If the ‘Conservatives’ had accommodated the known preferences of adherents of the United Kingdom Independence Party, they would have achieved a comfortable working majority and would not have found themselves on the edge of a deep abyss.

LIST OF ISSUES THAT NEED URGENT ATTENTION
BUT ARE BEING IGNORED BY THE COALITION
Among the gimmicks proffered by the Coalition is the idea of a bonfire of nit-picking laws and regulations implemented under the disgraced Labour Government.

These in fact reflect the hegemony of the Brussels apparat over the House of Commons, since 80% of legislation spewed out by the European Commission, which enjoys Hitlerian General Powers to initiate legislation, are derived from this unelected, unaccountable, corrupt ‘authority’.

Meanwhile there is no sign that the Coalition cares, or has a clue, about the issues that really matter, which include the following:

• Repeal of legislation mimicking the iniquitous provisions of the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which allows IT platform providers to host breaches of copyright by third parties, and to refuse to remove the same until the ownership of the copyright and rights is proven by the owners. This loophole enables copyright material (such as our books, for instance) to be downloaded onto such platforms and for an unknown quantity of illegal copies to be made until such time as the copyright owner becomes aware of the breach and initiates the procedure to compel the platform controller to remove the offending posting.

In our case, whole copies of some of our books have been illegally downloaded with the copyright page deliberately and maliciously removed in order to disguise the ownership of the copyright. This loophole is costing British publishers millions every year: we ourselves have lost book sales (at full price) valued at over $2.0 million due to this abomination. There is no indication at all that the ‘enlightened ones’ running the new Government have a clue about this issue.

In addition, the former MEP Ashley Mote, has usefully highlighted the following Labour legislation which needs to be abolished. This list is augmented by the Editor’s own contributions:

• Civil Contingencies Act 2005.

• Criminal Justice Act 2003.

• Extradition Acts 2003 and 2006 (containing the iniquitous imbalanced provisions favouring extradition of Britons to the United States, but impeding the extradition of Americans to Britain).

• Firearms Act 1996 and 1997 (which have led to sharp increases in violent crime in UK cities).

• Health and Safety Act 1997.

• Hunting Act 2004.

• ID Cards Act 2006 [this IS included in the Coalition’s agenda.]

• Legislative and Regulatory reform Act 2006.

• Police and Justice Act 2006.

• Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

• Terrorism Act 2005

During its 13-year ‘reign of terror’, the disgraced Labour Government passed over 500 new Acts of Parliament – six on immigration, eight on terrorism, 12 on education, 11 on health and social care, and 25 on criminal justice. Most of these new Statutes were enacted in response to the previous Government’s EUdolatry – i.e. to comply with new European Commission Directives.

• None of these laws, including the Quasi-Non-Government Organisations (quangos) they created, has improved the quality of life in the United Kingdom.

The following measures would be adopted if the new Government were not arguably the feeblest manifestation of governance ever to have emerged onto the British political stage:

• All British primary law based on European Commission Directives, including Human Rights, Health and Safety, Regional Assemblies, Data Protection, Race Relations and innumerable other scatterbrained, Talmudic nanny-state provisions imposed by the corrupt European Commission in conformity with its pan-German hegemony ‘General Powers’ control remit.

• Abolition of all busy-body entities, legislation and unaccountable and unelected agencies of Government responsible for the enforcement of nit-picking provisions dictated by Brussels which routinely intermeddle in people’s lives.

• Abolition of all organisations, such as ‘Common Purpose’ (funded of course by Deutsche Bank: see below), including quangos which seek to change and manipulate the way people think.

• Abolish the Local Government Standards Board which enables officials to complain when elected councilors criticise them.

• Abolish all targets for hospitals, schools and the police, the effect of which has been to divert effort away from their real purposes in order to ‘avoid trouble’ from the Government.

• Any surviving quangos would have to be made liable under the Harassment Act 1997 to individuals faced with oppressive intrusion into their lives.

We further agree with Ashley Mote that the following additional measures are urgently required (in which the Coalition has shown not the slightest interest):

• Employment: Restore the right of employers to employ the best candidate for any job.

• Health: Restructure hospital managements so that doctors’ clinical judgments and patients‘ needs come first. Doctors and nurses should decide. Managers should manage. Restore matrons and their powers to manage wards.

• Criminal Justice: Immediate restoration of Habeas Corpus and the protection of British law whenever a foreign country seeks extradition of a British national. The prima facie case against him or her must be heard and decided by a British court.

• Public Services: Restore British ownership of ALL essential public services and protect our vital national interests using Mrs Thatcher’s famous golden share principle. There can be no foreign majority ownership of essential British utilities. (Instead of which the country’s essential assets are passing at breakneck speed into European hands, as always intended under the Nazi compendium Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft: see above).

• Farming: Restore the right of British farmers to grow whatever they like.

• Fishing: Prohibit all foreign fishing vessels in a 200 miles area around UK coasts

• Defence: Restore spending on defence to at least five per cent of total public spending to ensure that the armed forces have the capabilities and resources to defend the country.

• Note: In this context, the new Minister of Defence, Liam Fox, backed by the Foreign Secretary, William Hague, is operating on the right lines. On 22nd May, he flew to Afghanistan to investigate the acceleration of the repatriation of British troops (so that British will no longer be complicit in America’s dirty drug war designed to control, not eradicate, the heroin trade).

• Fox has also made it clear that British military deployments will in future be governed strictly by British national interests.

• The significance of this is as follows. As previously discussed in these reports, the British military has irresponsibly allowed itself to become co-opted and hijacked to fulfil the squalid requirements of an internationalist agenda – that is to say, British troops have been dying in pursuit of an agenda that has nothing to do with the interests of the British people and nation.

Liam Fox appears to have understood this: and if he hasn’t, he has at least recognised that there is no way that British military force can continue to be rented out to the internationalists.

Secondly, Mr Fox cites British national interests, illustrating yet again the abject confusion that reigns at the heart of the British political Establishment over Europe. Under the political collective régime, satrap ‘Member States’ HAVE NO INTERESTS, because their national interests have been collectivised (there remain a few exceptions to this, but that is the reality).

• This is a truth that the political class simply cannot grasp, or doesn’t understand (because it doesn’t begin to realise that the European Union Collective is, precisely, a collective entrapment mechanism). Fox has clearly not grasped this reality yet.

• Migration: Re-establish a clear difference between economic migration and genuine pleas for asylum. Britain should accept its share of genuine refugees but without necessarily offering British nationality. The UK Immigration Service should be focused on identifying and completing genuine cases within one month, using tough and fair criteria.

• All visa applications to be made from abroad. No visa, no travel.

• Abolition of the Foreign Office’s recruitment cadre in Pakistan which operates on a quota basis – that is to say, the staff have quotas of would-be immigrant Pakistanis that they must meet. This operation is clearly subversive, a scandal, and should be folded forthwith.

• Limit work permits to essential workers only. No right to benefits.
‘Support yourself and your families or leave’.

• Encourage the return of immigrants to their own countries.
‘Be a part of the British way of life or leave’.

• Deport all illegal immigrants and convicted criminals not born in the United Kingdom. Encourage voluntary repatriation. Abolish the iniquitous interference derived from European Human Rights legislation whereby, for instance, a known dangerous terrorist cannot be extradited because extradition would breach his human rights.

• The Overseas Development Budget: The coalition has ring-fenced this permissive source of official expenditure which could and should be cut down to the bone.

Specifically, it proposes to ‘guarantee’ that the equivalent of 0.7% of Gross Domestic Product will continue to be allocated to overseas development. This is complete, idiotic madness. The ONLY territories for which Britain should continue to provide assistance are British Overseas Territories.

Former colonies that preferred independence are on their own, as they made their choice and must live with the consequences. At a time when the Government’s finances have been decimated by the ravages of the preceding incompetent régime, to ring-fence overseas development is sheer perverse delinquent madness.

Overseas Governments accustomed to receiving British assistance should be told in no uncertain terms: ‘The British people are having to suffer because of our financial predicament, and we have a much greater responsibility towards the British people than we have to you. In fact we don’t have any responsibility towards you at all: what we have done in the past represents donations pro bono publico. There isn’t any money to permit any more generosity on the part of British taxpayers, not least because you never thanked us for a single penny we remitted to you in the past’.

Of course the weasel argument against such a stance would be that if British aid dries up, then other powers will step into areas where Britain has had influence in the past. To which our sharp answer would be: our ongoing studies of the consistency with which the United States has stabbed its ‘closest ally’ in the back economically since the Second World War, make it clear that British aid hasn’t displaced such below-the-radar hostile operations on the part of Washington. And the same applies to other so-called ‘allies’. So get real, and stop living in your own dream bubble.

COALITION INFESTED BY GERMAN ‘COMMON PURPOSE’ PSY-OPS
A clue as to why not much, if any, of the above absolutely necessary and overdue reforms will take place under the Coalition Government emerged on 13th May, when The Daily Telegraph reported that ‘the first meeting of David Cameron’s new Coalition Cabinet had ended with Ministers hailing the ‘common purpose’ of the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats.

Michael Gove, the new Education Secretary, and an intelligence operative, commented:

‘It was great, actually. I think we had a really constructive meeting. I was delighted by the sense of partnership and common purpose that we had there’.

As previously reported, ‘Common Purpose’ is an extremely subversive targeted mind-control and personality change Fifth Column operation financed by Deutsche Bank, which was surreptitiously run for many years from the office of the Deputy Prime Minister under the now discredited Labour Government, John Prescott. It runs intensive brainwashing courses for ignorant cadres from the police, the military, the National Health Service, welfare, local government, the judiciary, the legal profession and other segments of influence-building society, often resulting in early marriage or personality breakdowns as participants are subjected to the ‘tabula rasa’ Psy-Ops approach and assaulted with crass, dumbed-down, politically ‘correct’ notions.

It is this Fifth Column subversion operation which is directly responsible for the decay of standards right across the board, and for substituting upside-down thinking – such as that homosexuality is acceptable and it is a gross offence to criticise it. On that score, the dumbed-down participants are of course not reminded what homosexuals actually do to each other.

In other words, ‘Common Purpose’ uses known psychological warfare manipulation techniques to brainwash stupid components of the upper levels of society, at the participants’ massive expense of course, into junking their ‘old values’ and replacing them with the garbage, back-to-front values which lead to such outrages as victims of burglary being arrested rather than the burglar. This is a deliberate, controlled, German-funded subversion programme. The repeated use by new Coalition Ministers of the words ‘Common Purpose’ is extremely disturbing, especially as it is believed that David Cameron has himself been brainwashed by this Fifth Column Psy-Ops agentur.

SEVERE TENSIONS ALREADY WRACKING BOTH COALITION PARTNERS
Meanwhile in the House of Commons, fractures on both sides of the Coalition are the main talking point, and have been receiving extensive press coverage. One veteran MP informed The Sunday Telegraph (23rd May) that the atmosphere prevailing among Conservative backbenchers generally was ‘worse than at any time since Maastricht’ in 1992 – code for the reality that the atmosphere is ALREADY POISONOUS. A clumsy attempt by Cameron to ambush the backbench 1922 Committee in order to bring this forum for backbenchers’ dissent under Cabinet control has seriously backfired, fuelling resentment among Conservatives already dissatisfied with the wholesale emasculation of the Conservative platform and with intended measures such as the proposed increase in capital gains tax to 40% and the scrapping of a Conservative plan to raise the threshold for Inheritance Tax from £350,000, above which level 40% tax must be paid, to £1.0 million.

A sign of the unscrupulous nature of the Coalition’s arrangements was an uncalled-for remark by the new Home Secretary, the bossy Theresa May, who suddenly pronounced that she ‘no longer’ opposed the adoption of children by homosexual/lesbian couples. In other words, the woman has no fixed principles at all, sways with the wind, and accommodates her ‘views’ to meet the pragmatic requirements of the moment. Since the Home Office is the third most important Office of State, this is hardly an indicator of prospective principled governance.

On the Liberal-Democratic side of the equation, the relegation of the impressive Dr Vince Cable, to the position of Business Secretary, where he has had to deliver £900 million of ‘cuts’ already to the Chancellor, George Osborne, is described by observers as ‘an eruption waiting to happen’. Cable, who thought he might wind up as Chancellor of the Exchequer, is being further cut down to size by Osborne, who was intending to appoint Sir Samuel Sassoon, shortly to be ennobled, as Commerce Secretary in the House of Lords – a sure recipe for idiotic turf warfare. Innumerable other ripples of discontent have surfaced, the tawdry ensemble of which in our view suggests that it is entirely possible that this enterprise will, contrary to currently received opinion, suddenly collapse.

• An indication that the Coalition is not averse to dirty tricks, either, surfaced on 19th May, when the Coalition presented its ‘final’ feeble version of what had been agreed.

Dr Vince Cable waited for ages to get to the microphone, but found himself mysteriously entangled with the mike and its connecting cable, so that he had to ad-lib: ‘As the new head of the department for technical innovation, we make it up as we go along’. No. What probably happened is that a dirty tricks operative made sure that when he reached for the mike, the connecting cables had been pre-entangled to maximise his embarrassment in front of the media. The Conservatives don’t like Cable because of his previous close association with the Labour Party.

There is also much anger at ‘grass roots’ level, with the 600,000 ‘workers’ who knock on doors on behalf of the Conservative Party reportedly angered that they wasted their time, as the Coalition’s political platform has little to do with what they promoted on the doorstep.

Additionally, the arrangement whereby opposition parties receive what for some reason is known as ‘Short’ money, amounting to £2.0 million in the case of the Liberal Democrats, is now denied to the relatively impecunious Lib-Dems, who would therefore be in trouble if another General Election were to have to be held any time soon.

All in all, therefore, contrary to the propaganda and spin, the UK political situation seems to this veteran observer to be highly unstable.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

THE FOLLOWING DATA HAS BEEN PUBLISHED AT THE FOOT OF MOST OF THESE REPORTS FOR THE PAST THREE YEARS++: COMPILED BY U.S. SECURITIES EXPERT MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S..

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
NOTICES:

BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time AMENDING AND INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE. In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

ENDEMIC CORRUPTION IN BRUSSELS AND HALLIBURTON

chrisstory

WHAT HAVE THEY GOT IN COMMON? BOTH ARE INSTITUTIONALLY PUTRID AND BEYOND REDEMPTION: NEW UNDERWORLD DISORDER DENS OF INIQUITY

Sunday 2 May 2010 00:01

• The Add-ons and Updates posted at the top of this report have now been migrated to the foot of the report. That does not mean they are less relevant than they were [see below].

• THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE

• GOVERNMENT TRANSFERS OF VAT RECEIPTS TO BRUSSELS ARE ILLEGAL

• ‘CLEAN UP YOUR ACCOUNTS TO OUR COMPLETE
SATISFACTION WITHIN ONE YEAR, OR WE KEEP THE LOT’

• OBSCENE TO PAY MONEY ILLEGALLY TO BRUSSELS WHEN BRITAIN IS BUST

THE GULF OF MEXICO OIL PLATFORM EXPLOSION:
CEMENT CASING THAT BLEW WAS INSTALLED BY HALLIBURTON :
MORE U.S./DVD SABOTAGE AGAINST THE BRITISH? YES… SEE UPDATE

EXPOSURE OF HALLIBURTON’S SCAMMING OPERATIONS: 26 MAY 2008

• THE HALLIBURTON DRUG THUG AND THE STOLEN FEDERAL SALARIES SCAM

• WHAT THE FBI FOUND IN THE CIA-HALLIBURTON DRUG THUG’S APARTMENT

• MULTIPLE SALARIES PAID INTO SWISS BANK ACCOUNTS

• HALLIBURTON’S THIEVES INSIDE THE CIA AND THE INEVITABLE CONSEQEUENCES

• TENET AND CHENEY REFUSED TO ADDRESS THESE ISSUES

• CHENEY WAS INFORMED IN A RECORDED PHONE CALL

• COUNTERINTELLIGENCE OPERATION AGAINST TENET AND CHENEY BACKFIRES

• OVER 50% OF HALLIBURTON SALES BREACHED NATIONAL SECURITY

• THEFTS OF CIA COMPUTERS LEADING TO AN UNIMAGINABLE CATASTROPHE

• HALLIBURTON CROOK BRAGGED ABOUT LUCRATIVE SALE TO THE RUSSIANS

• THE CATASTROPHE, COURTESY OF THE CORRUPTION OF TENET, CHENEY AND BUSH

• DEATHS DUE TO THE STEALING OF A CIA COMPUTER

• ENTER THE ‘DARK LORDS’: DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO BUSH
‘CHENEY & BUSH TOOK THE MONEY FOR THE COMPUTERS USED FOR THE MURDERS’

• BUSH AND CHENEY RESPONSIBLE FOR 168 CIA DEATHS, COVERED UP (HITHERTO)

• HALLIBURTON LINKED TO THESE MURDERS OF CIA PERSONNEL

• CIA INVESTIGATOR TOLD TO ‘BACK OFF, OR ELSE’

• BIO-FEEDBACK EQUIPMENT STOLEN BY HALLIBURTON FOR THE RUSSIANS

• CHENEY THREATENS TO KILL THE VETERAN CIA OPERATIVE PERSONALLY

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

• AS PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED, OUR LANDLINES REMAIN CLOSED BECAUSE OF UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT. WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL OR THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:
NEW: LETTER FROM VIENNA [5TH MAY] ADDED AT FOOT OF THIS SEGMENT.

VIDEOS OF THE EDITOR’S SPEECH IN LONDON ON 31ST OCTOBER 2009
We append below the links to the videos of the Editor’s speech. The Editor had no idea that his speech was being filmed, and neither was he aware that it was rebroadcast on BBC-5 on the 14th November 2009. We didn’t post this earlier because the Editor isn’t in the business of emulating Peacock Obama. But a malicious distorted image of the Editor is repeatedly shown on a notorious US controlled ‘Black’ intel Brit-hating disinformation website, which scandalously pumps out dirty, clumsy and fabricated anti-British ‘Black’ propaganda and lies worse than anything experienced from the Soviets at the height of the Cold War: so by showing this speech (in which the Editor had something very important to say: see below) you will see that the Editor’s face doesn’t consist of a squashed nose, forty blemishes, ten bunions, horns and a forked tongue.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jug-W-DKcms
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lB18PIYbSYw&;feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJyUKbmBeJs&;feature=related

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE
The subject-matter of the speech was that since the European Commission’s accounts have not been APPROVED by the European Union Collective’s own Court of Auditors based in Luxembourg for 14 years, the European Commission is a criminal enterprise. This was specifically reconfirmed for us by an official at the Court of Auditors named Novaks, in person.

A senior official named Craig with the UK Serious Fraud Office confirmed separately that it is a criminal offence for taxpayers’ funds to be remitted into the hands of a criminal enterprise.

GOVERNMENT TRANSFERS OF VAT RECEIPTS TO BRUSSELS ARE ILLEGAL
This being the case, the British and other EU ‘Member States” satrap Governments are knowingly engaged in the criminal act of illegally transferring UK taxpayers’ funds to a criminal enterprise, which in turn implies that VAT taxpayers can sue their Governments for the recovery of their funds which have been remitted contrary to the law into foreign criminal accounts.

The Editor recommends that (in the UK context: other EU satrap ‘Member States’ can do as they please), an IMMEDIATE STOP MUST BE ORDERED TO THIS OFFICIAL CRIMINAL PRACTICE and that 100% of UK VAT accruals be diverted FORTHWITH into a special Treasury account sine die.

‘CLEAN UP YOUR ACCOUNTS TO OUR COMPLETE
SATISFACTION WITHIN ONE YEAR, OR WE KEEP THE LOT’
The European Commission should be told that the British authorities expect a total rehabilitation and clean-up of ALL EC accounts for the past 14 years to be implemented, accompanied by the necessary overdue criminal investigations and prosecutions, with the outcomes to be approved not only by the Court of Auditors but also to the complete satisfaction of the authorities in London; and that if this is not done within one calendar year of the Brussels Commission being so advised, all accumulated and future VAT receipts will be annexed to offset the colossal indebtedness of the British Government incurred under Gordon Brown’s incompetent tenure.

The advantage of this approach is that this will be a unilateral measure by the British Government, overriding all the convoluted Talmudic claptrap and diversionary self-serving, deliberately opaque verbiage routinely spewed out by the Eurocrats in order to erect a bureaucratic smokescreen to separate the Commission from meaningful scrutiny of its institutionalised criminality.

OBSCENE TO PAY MONEY ILLEGALLY TO BRUSSELS WHEN BRITAIN IS BUST
More to the point, it is OBSCENE for the British authorities to be engaged in this criminal practice of transferring VAT receipts to Brussels when the Government’s finances are in TOTAL DISARRAY.

The fact that this CRIMINAL OFFICIAL BEHAVIOUR has continued notwithstanding Britain’s Brown-generated fiscal crisis is a scandal of monumental proportions, indicating that the UK bureaucratic and political establishments have taken leave of their senses, placing crass EUdolatry ahead of national economic and financial survival. THIS IS A TRULY MONSTROUS STATE OF AFFAIRS.

NEW: LETTER FROM VIENNA: 5TH MAY 2010: PAN-GERMANS IN THE BUNDESTAG LAMENT THE IMMINENT COLLAPSE OF THE LATEST VERSION OF THEIR CORRUPT PAN-EUROPA:

Our Vienna correspondent, Wolfgang Perthen, writes [with a few interpolations by the Editor]:

Dear Mr. Story,

I’m right now watching on German TV, a live broadcast from the floor of the German Bundestag.

In a formal “Regierungserklärung” in the face of the “Greek” and therefore all-European currency problem (and ahead of this Friday’s parliamentary vote on German financial support for Greece), Chancellor Angela Merkel (who is otherwise not too famous for clear statements) emphasised her willingness to solve the current crisis and to proceed on the path to further European integration as envisioned since the days of Adenauer (!!!).

EVEN AS THE E.U. ROOF IS CAVING IN, THE FORMER SECRETARY OF THE AGITATION AND PROPAGANDA DEPARTMENT OF THE YOUNG COMMUNISTS AT MARX-LENIN UNIVERSITY, IS RECOMMENDING NEW CONSTRUCTION! [Ed]. Merkel stated also that a European Union without its most powerful economy, Germany, would be unthinkable.

Opposition leader, Frank-Walter Steinmeier (SPD), even expressed the view that “Europe” is now going through the most severe crisis since the Treaties of Rome.

Yet, the only logical way out of the current dilemma (everywhere recommended by experienced economists anyway: see International Currency Review throughout the 1990s: Ed.), namely allowing Greece (and possibly Portugal, Spain, Ireland, and, who knows, Italy) out of the currency union so they can re-introduce their own currencies and thus be able to devalue (and accordingly prevent further contagion throughout the region) is precluded.The Euro is indeed a sacred cow.

As it represents (and all I’m able to grasp in this realm I attribute to the literature of Golitsyn and Story!) a key political symbol of anti-national political union, NO MATTER HOW DEEP THE CRISIS, they won’t allow a single country out of the failing currency system, as this would send “the wrong signal”…. Accordingly, the entire spectrum of the peoples of Europe is now belatedly awakening to the reality that the EU is indeed (as you, Mr Story, have so extensively described) a POLITICAL COLLECTIVE: Together we stand, together we fall. ‘We’ve got to stick together, or we all go down: WHICH IS THE REVERSE OF THE TRUTH. GREECE, PORTUGAL, IRELAND, SPAIN NEED TO GET OUT OF THE COLLECTIVE CURRENCY, AS OUR JOURNAL REPEATEDLY PREDICTED: Ed..

As for Germany, the driving force of the Euro project, they now – quite predictably – prove to be the same old “Dummkopfs” (in proper German: Dummköpfe) as has always been the case. There seems to be an unrootable characteristic in the German national “psyche”, that believes it can MANAGE and CARRY (and, of course, dominate) everything. The Germans – however capable, ambitious, and perfectionist – seem to be the No. 1 nation consisting of “genetic” totalitarians in the world.

And they lack – as you frequently indicate – this snakish quality of a “higher intelligence”, call it Soviet-Russian, Mongol, or Jewish, that makes the DECISIVE difference in geopolitics. In that sense, the Germans, with all their self-esteem and claims of “responsible leadership”, in the end always lose. They tried, yet again, by stealth this time, to take over the whole of Europe: now the collective currency that they have forced upon almost everybody, is falling back on their heads.

Their role as a self-declared politico-economic locomotive, their arrogant load of “responsibility”, now turns out to be a curse for them (as in WW II). Strangely, if one listens to the speeches in the German Bundestag, they seem to be not so much worried about Germany (as every other country, naturally, is now concerned, first and foremost, about its own survival), BUT RATHER ABOUT THE PROSPECT THAT THEIR SACRED PAN-GERMAN HEGEMONY OVER EUROPE IS FALLING APART.

At the same time, while Germany’s nice and orderly Europe starts collapsing and social unrest and revolutionary pressure threatens to accumulate (certainly fuelled by the Moscow-controlled Fifth Column), the Soviets see their moment in history approaching.

Please do watch this coming Sunday’s (May 9) military parade on Red Square: they have prepared an even more impressive display of their military power than last year!

All the best to you, Sir,
Sincerely,
Wolfgang Perthen, Vienna

THE GULF OF MEXICO OIL PLATFORM EXPLOSION:
CEMENT CASING THAT BLEW WAS INSTALLED BY HALLIBURTON :
MORE U.S./DVD SABOTAGE AGAINST THE BRITISH? YES…
Just as our suspicions from the outset over the Polish air catastrophe at Smolensk proved to be justified, so do we and many others smell a giant rat concerning the explosion and fire at the BP oil platform in the Gulf of Mexico. And the face of the rat bears an uncanny resemblance to the ugly physiognomy of George Bush Sr.

• UPDATE, 3RD MAY 2010: Anecdotal evidence is indeed emerging pointing to sabotage. The lack of the usual press-frenzy interviews with survivors is also suspicious. But the main reason that we suspect sabotage is that this operation has coincided with key developments behind the scenes involving the British which has severely inconvenienced the evil American criminal kleptocracy. Seen in that light, this is a blatant sabotage operation tantamount to an act of war against the UK perpetrated as a revenge attack for the basest of motives. Unfortunately at this juncture we can’t elaborate on what has been going on behind the scenes, but you can draw your own conclusions.

Further indications that this is a deliberate, malicious revenge operation against British interests (a very dangerous departure, if true, as there is such a phenomenon as ‘tit for tat’) are evident in the harsh, mafioso-style language emerging from the throats of US officials.

For instance, Mr Kenneth Salazar, US Interior Secretary (i.e., the ‘Minister of the Interior’) is reported as having stated on 2nd May: ‘Our job basically is to keep the boot on the neck of [BP] to carry out the responsibilities they have both under the law and contractually to move forward and stop this spill’, even though it was almost certrainly a consequence of a revenge sabotage and provocation operation perpetrated by disaffected rogue revolutionary cadres within the US structures working to the CIA/DVD agenda.

For starters, the cement casing that blew up was installed by the corrupt Cheney-CIA operation called Halliburton. Apparently this is the second time in a year that a Halliburton casing has failed catastrophically on an oil rig.

It may be recalled from our earlier coverage that Halliburton operates a huge parasitical buying and ordering department within the Central Intelligence Agency and a parallel parasitical department inside the Pentagon, and that both these entities scam the opposite host on a routine basis, at the expense of the US taxpayer. Whether this unbelievable duplicated CIA scandal was investigated and wound up after we and others exposed it [see report dated 26th May 2008, excerpted below: ARCHIVE], we don’t know. What we do recall is it became the subject of a Grand Jury investigation.

Horror stories associated with this colossal corruption op. included the faulty Halliburton gun manufactured in Saudi Arabia that routinely exploded and killed the gunner, which Halliburton continued selling long after the accidents in question (plus the despicably amoral cover-up of the reason for the gun operators’ deaths); and the notorious delivery of 1,000 toasters which could be bought for $19.99 at any hardware store, but which Halliburton invoiced to the Pentagon for $1,891 a piece, on the spurious pretext that they were manufactured from a special metal.

Now the oil rig that exploded in the Gulf of Mexico at 10:pm CST on 20th April 2010, was ‘Deepwater Horizon’ owned by Transocean Limited, based in Zug, Switzerland, with its principal office located in HOUSTON, Texas, and other offices in Zug and Vernier, Switzerland, and in George Town, Cayman Islands. Zug is where Marc Rich, real name HANS BRAND, the long-range Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD) operative and East-West intermediary, is based.

The explosion occurred on the very same day that Transocean shares started trading in Europe, as is confirmed by the following Press Release dated 20th April 2010:

http://www.deepwater.com/fw/main/News-748.html?c=113031&;p=irol-news&nyo=0

‘ZUG, SWITZERLAND, Apr 20, 2010 (MARKETWIRE via COMTEX) — Transocean Ltd. (NYSE: RIG) (SIX: RIGN), the world’s largest offshore drilling contractor, announced that its shares will begin trading on SIX Swiss Exchange (“SIX”) today under the symbol (RIGN). Transocean’s shares also trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol (RIG)’.

Following this sabotage, Barack Obama reversed course on offshore drilling, BARELY THREE WEEKS after he had publicly announced a revised domestic energy policy lifting the longstanding moratorium on certain offshore drilling. Specifically, on 30th April 2010, the controlled US ‘State News Agency’ Associated Press reported:

‘A top adviser to President Barack Obama said Friday that no new oil drilling would be authorized until authorities learn what caused the explosion of the rig Deepwater Horizon. David Axelrod told ABC’s ‘Good Morning America’ that ‘no additional drilling has been authorized and none will until we find out what has happened here’. Obama recently lifted a drilling moratorium for many offshore areas, including the Atlantic and Gulf areas’.

‘The oil slick could become the nation’s worst environmental disaster in decades, threatening even the Exxon Valdez in scope’.

According to Reuters [25th April 2010]:

‘Swiss-based Transocean Ltd.’s Deepwater Horizon sank on Thursday, two days after it exploded and caught fire while finishing a well for BP Plc., 42 miles off the Louisiana coast.

Eleven workers from the rig are missing and presumed dead in what is the worst oil rig disaster in almost a decade. The Coast Guard on Friday suspended a search for the workers.

London-based BP, which is financially responsible for the cleanup, has deployed an armada of ships and aircraft to contain the oil slick.

The explosion came almost three weeks after President Barack Obama unveiled plans for a limited expansion of US offshore oil and gas drilling…. The explosion occurred as the rig was capping a discovery well pending production, company officials said. Some 115 of the 126 workers on board at the time of the explosion were rescued’.

• HOWEVER:

• The ‘Deepwater Horizon’ operation received a safety award in 2009.

• Has British Petroleum at last realised that it is just as hazardous to do business adjacent to US waters as it is to do business in the Soviet Union?

If BP had had the wit to subscribe to Soviet Analyst years ago, we could have informed them that a primary purpose, from the Soviet perspective, of enticing foreign oil corporations into the ‘former’ USSR was to procure the necessary transfer of technology into Soviet hands, before the GRU-KGB-controlled ‘oligarchs’ would squeeze the Western operators out.

• The Americans similarly use sabotage to destabilise the foreign competition.

• As you can see, there is more than a passing indication that this sabotage may be a desperate Bush Crime Syndicate-related (i.e., DVD) operation, with the non-coincidental ‘happy’ outcome that British Petroleum, sabotaged again, bleeds financially.

• In other words, yet another typically hardnosed US kick in the teeth for the Brits, not unassociated, we suspect, with concurrent forceful financial developments in the background.

EXPOSURE OF HALLIBURTON’S SCAMMING OPERATIONS: 26 MAY 2008
The following description of the pit of corrupt degradation known as Halliburton is excerpted from our report dated 28th May 2008 [ARCHIVE]. It reflects the detailed inside knowledge of a fearless and serious-minded whistleblower. [Note: The narrative as partially reproduced here starts ‘out of context’. However you can pick up such context as is necessary to be in a position to comprehend the cess-pit of degradation that is being exposed, as you read into the excerpt]:

THE HALLIBURTON DRUG THUG AND THE STOLEN FEDERAL SALARIES SCAM
A former top CIA aide to Tenet and 30-year CIA veteran now reveals the criminal background of ‘HallCIA’, the thug who yanked the officer’s phone from the wall, ransacked the CIA operative’s office, had the officer incarcerated in Halliburton’s own cell in the basement of CIA headquarters and on a separate occasion punched holes in the officer’s office wall, displayed episodes of extreme violence and was observed by many to be high on drugs. He was also a murderer….

This was the criminal whom Cheney asserted to be a friend who could never be arrested. This description leads into a summary of another scam, whereby multiple salaries are paid into corrupt Halliburton employees’ secret Swiss bank accounts:

‘HallCIA’ and the Head Programmer were moved back to Halliburton’s main office, just like the priests sexually abusing children are moved to a different parish.

They were never prosecuted…

[Dressed in FBI uniform provided by Halliburton, the operative is engaged in an FBI action to arrest this Halliburton thug], He was arrested for FIRST DEGREE MURDER OF AN FBI OFFICER. I had proof that the FBI officer that he had murdered was a bona fide one with proper papers and vetting in the FBI’s personnel archives. The FBI had fingerprint and DNA evidence to prove that the Halliburton programmer was the murderer.

They even had a trial and a conviction of the man for that murder.

He had feigned a fainting episode right before the reading of the sentence and been taken to a hospital. He then assaulted the hospital guard inside his room and left him unconscious in his bed. Then he impersonated the guard using his uniform. He later went to a lawyer who put in a motion to declare the trial a mistrial on the grounds of a technicality: the defendant had not been present at the reading of the sentence. The fact that the criminal had committed a second nearly deadly assault the same day in apparent good health, was omitted from that motion.

The FBI-clandestine CIA raid that I organized was on the private flat of ‘HallCIA’. It was not at his house where he lived with a prostitute whom he pimped, according to a CIA file. He did not keep his contraband items there as there were too many unsavory people coming through his house.

WHAT THE FBI FOUND IN THE CIA-HALLIBURTON DRUG THUG’S APARTMENT
At the flat the FBI confiscated drugs in pusher quantities and also illegal weapons, including some unregistered machine guns, explosives and hand-held artillery that could blow big holes through a wall for illegal entry. He had one bedroom devoted just to weapons, with shelves devoted to about half-kilo packages of drugs. It was equipped with a padlock. CIA top secret documents were strewn all over the bed, dresser and floor of the master bedroom.

It looked like a hurricane had hit the bedroom even before we arrived. The padlock was broken on the door to the weapons and drug room and the door was open when we arrived. But all the drugs were still neatly on the shelves. The flat may have been raided by Russian intelligence before we arrived, leaving the CIA documents behind as cover-up after copying them.

The FBI collected fingerprints and I collected the CIA documents. After the raid I returned to the FBI station and filled in the appropriate forms to write a FBI report up on the raid. As I was doing so, the two FBI officers who I had spoken with two days before walked by the desk I was using. They did a double take seeing me in the FBI uniform…. I told them that I had just tested FBI vetting and security procedures for a report I was writing for the CIA. I also explained to them that I had just successfully impersonated an FBI official to the extent of going on a raid with them, and not one had yet asked for my name or run it through a background check. I showed them the CIA top-secret documents the raid had netted and they laughed at the ruse I had played on the FBI.

They were not laughing, however, when I explained how I had gotten that FBI uniform and signed the papers. They checked on their computers; I was not yet registered on the records of the FBI.

I asked them to arrest all of the appropriate Halliburton people involved in that scam. They called the Director of the FBI and I also spoke to him. He refused to authorize the arrests.

He told me: ‘Write up your report and let me read it first’. I offered to drive over immediately with the evidence. He refused to make any time to see me. I immediately faxed him a short report and enough evidence to warrant the arrests. Nothing happened.

MULTIPLE SALARIES PAID INTO SWISS BANK ACCOUNTS
But the next day when the local FBI checked my name again, they called me to let me know that I was officially part of the FBI now per their computer. I promptly sent in a full report to the FBI, the CIA, and the Pentagon on this scam to sign up Halliburton employees as their officers and have the US taxpayer pay their salaries. Just like Halliburton over-billed, some Halliburton employees were
collecting THREE US Government salaries; one from the Pentagon, one from the FBI, and one from the CIA. I wrote in my report that I had signed up in all three places via Halliburton’s scam to see how long it would be before those scams were stopped.

I put on the three forms, separate Swiss bank accounts. The point was to use the accounts as evidence of Halliburton corruption when those cases came to trial; I have not touched a cent of that money. The Directors of the FBI, the CIA, and the Chief of the JCS that I sent those reports to did not implement my list of recommendations; one of them was to shut down all of those public salaries going to Halliburton employees. At least, they had not been implemented as of about Summer 2004 when I last checked those accounts.

Another recommendation was to make sure that everyone in those agencies is properly vetted and drug tested as per that agency’s usual security measures. Because I was concerned that my clear recommendations would not be acted upon, I despatched copies of those letters, the forms that I had signed, and the numbers of the Swiss bank accounts to the GAO. In my covering letter to the GAO I told them that I had given them the authority to check the balances in those accounts by written authorization to the Swiss bank.

I had hoped that seeing US taxpayer’s money streaming into those accounts would give them an incentive to prosecute those cases promptly. Since the banks were not in the United States, I doubt that coercion applied to the bankers will erase those accounts, but I could be wrong. Since I had long been a covert CIA person, those communications with officials and the banks were under aliases. The GAO however has all of the proper information to check those accounts again and to prosecute these cases. I myself no longer remember any of the aliases and account numbers, so I
couldn’t access that money even if I wanted to. I never intended to use that money at all, so I did not record those aliases and numbers into my personal effects.

In 2004 when I checked the accounts, I did so from within the CIA by pulling up the report that I had written to the DCI. I have no way to check those accounts now so I do not know whether that scam, as evidenced by a single person’s accounts, has been stopped. When I checked in 2004, two years had already passed. The US taxpayer had paid [as follows]: via the CIA, about $80,000.00 each year, for a total of about $160,000.00; via the FBI, about $50,000.00 each year, for a total of $100,000.00; and via the Pentagon, about $80,000.00 each year for a total of about $160,000.00, or roughly $420,000.00 total into those three Swiss accounts…

I also checked on whether Halliburton continued paying those employees if it signed them up for a Federal salary. The answer was no, except for rare exceptions. ‘HallCIA’ had continued receiving a Halliburton salary while getting one at the CIA, but the Head Programmer had not.

When I checked in 2004 the number of Halliburton employees getting a CIA salary was over 200, the number receiving an FBI salary was over 400, and the number of Halliburton employees receiving a Pentagon salary, was over 300. Suppose that the total for that is about 1,000 salaries each at, say, $50,000 a year. That would mean that the US taxpayer was being bilked (by Cheney) of $50 million a year of fraudulent salaries. Over the eight years that this Cheney has been in the Vice President’s office, that could easily add up to $400 million in savings for Halliburton in not having had to to pay salaries. No wonder it was so easy to get that FBI uniform and salary sent out to me by talking to a Halliburton VP. Other Halliburton programmers had complained to me that they took a ‘cut in pay’ to work at the CIA location. They said that ‘the takings are good’, and ‘Halliburton fences the items for us in a 50-50 split’.

HALLIBURTON’S THIEVES INSIDE THE CIA AND THE INEVITABLE CONSEQEUENCES
When I heard that Halliburton’s people were stealing from inside the halls of the CIA, loud alarm
bells went off inside my head. The items inside the CIA which were easiest to carry out were of course its documents.

And any computer that one stole inside the CIA was likely to have top-secret information on it, in spades. It was a counterintelligence person’s nightmare, and now it was mine. The fact that the Head of the Halliburton section offices at the CIA had just sold the CIA’s communication satellite encryption security codes to Moscow burned in my mind.

The Russians had paid him $20,000 for that betrayal.

He had no clue as to their black market value. It made me worry that the Russians and the Chinese could buy every secret inside the CIA for a price that they could afford. More than one Halliburton person inside the CIA had admitted to me that they were stealing to make up for their cut in pay. Halliburton had switched them to Federal salaries, making the CIA pick up the tab [see above].

One Halliburton person at the CIA had told me that they were all stealing enough to make up for that cut in pay. [They were ONLY in it for the money: taking their cue from Cheney and Bush: Ed].

Therefore, the first thing I did was to find out what those 40-odd people used to earn at Halliburton. I had the CIA’s accounting office print out for me what the CIA was now paying them. My mouth then dropped open in shock. Each one of them would have to steal over $10,000 worth of CIA secrets or goods a year to break even. In some cases the cut in pay was much higher. One man took a $50,000 a year cut in pay when he switched to the Federal salary. At the average $23,000 cut in pay, the 40 workers together had sustained a $920,000 cut in pay. I had been told that Halliburton was fencing the goods in a 50%-50% split. So, about 2 million dollars’ worth of good at black market prices would be stolen from the CIA, if they actually made up their lost salaries stealing.

[There followed a summary of the notorious Aldrich Ames, Clyde Conrad, Larry Wu-Tai Chin, John Anthony Walker, and Robert Hanssen espionage cases, omitted here]

On February 22, 1994, Ames and his wife were formally charged by the United States Department of Justice with spying for the Soviet Union and Russia. Mr Ames could have faced the death penalty, since his betrayal had resulted in CIA ‘assets’ being killed. However, he received a sentence of life imprisonment, and his wife received only a five-year prison sentence for her conspiracy to commit espionage and tax evasion as part of a plea bargain by Ames.

TENET AND CHENEY REFUSED TO ADDRESS THESE ISSUES
I walked down to the office a very high-ranking CIA analyst, about third in the hierarchy in that department, a man I trusted. People advance inside the CIA by one of two means normally, being very good at what they do or being very good at lying to please those above them. The heads of each section were often in the latter category, as a general rule. I asked him how many secrets the Russians could buy for $2 million a year, if they had 40 moles able to walk the halls of the CIA. In the posing of the question I explained that the hypothetical moles would be assumed to be ‘efficient’ criminals without formal espionage training. I asked him what effect that would have on national security. He asked me if this was a conversational gambit or a request for a formal report to answer my question. I thought about it a moment and then said the latter.

That meant that I had to go get a signature on a form. By submitting to Mr Tenet new requests for 10 separate reports on a wide variety of important topics, I quickly brought the analyst the signed form that he needed. He whistled in surprise when he reviewed the assignment given to him there in black and white. Then he asked me ‘Is this about the Privatized Employees’ invasion of the CIA?’ I said yes. He said: ‘I have been urging Tenet to let us study that risk for months. No go. How did you get this when I couldn’t?’

I explained to him my method and also that the Head of the Halliburton group had just sold the CIA’s Communication Satellite Encryption Security Codes to the Russians.

He hadn’t heard that [because] Tenet had put a lid on it even within the CIA. I promised to show him the proof. I came back and gave him and a few of his top staff an hour long briefing on what I had learned. One man was actually in tears as I finished.

Another said: ‘This marks the end of US national security’. Another said, ‘No. US honor died already and no memo was sent announcing its funeral’.

I asked them what information they needed to make a proper assessment. They said that it would help them if I could find out how much the 40 people were actually making off their thefts inside the CIA, and a list of what they were stealing. I came back the next day with the list of how much each one had been paid by Halliburton in ‘bonuses’, which was the code word for fenced items, and what each ‘bonus’ was for. That list of what each bonus was for was like what the programmers really did in morphing an appliance rack into a bread slice rack. It was not a specifically accurate description but it related to the item in a fairly straightforward way.

CHENEY WAS INFORMED IN A RECORDED PHONE CALL
I showed the list to Tenet and tried to brief him on how dangerous it was.

He did not want to hear. Tenet had not followed my recommendations, which would have stopped the thefts. And he did not want further reasons why he should do so… I called Cheney and begged him to send a memo over to Halliburton setting up a program to [address these extremely serious issues]. I even faxed him a memo so that all he had to do was sign to get that to happen. He did not deny that Halliburton was selling items stolen from the CIA. He did not deny that he had the power to impose the necessary changes at Halliburton by sending the memo. He did not deny that he had the power to order Tenet to institute effective measures to stem the tide of the thefts.

As the phone recording of that call shows, I kept briefing him on the problem while he kept saying that he refused to discuss the matter with me.

I sent a copy of that call over to the GAO because it showed that I had in fact managed to inform Vice President Cheney of the seriousness of the thefts. In that call [to Cheney] I cited that the likely consequences were the shredding of US national security and the wholly unnecessary deaths of its covert personnel. I also set up a surveillance operation behind Cheney’s and Tenet’s back to actually inspect each item that Halliburton fenced from the CIA.

COUNTERINTELLIGENCE OPERATION AGAINST TENET AND CHENEY BACKFIRES
That is, I had an ex-CIA operative with counter-intelligence experience whom I trusted, apply to Halliburton. I instructed him to offer to ‘help them fence their CIA goods and get higher prices for them’. Call him Alan for short. A Halliburton VP, the same one who sent me the FBI uniform, sent me a ‘thank you’ letter for referring Alan to them. He no doubt believed that I was corrupt and making a kickback. It was to my advantage to foster that image of myself without it actually being true. In my position it was best if everything I did could be interpreted as corrupt at the same time that I was collecting the evidence for prosecution.

That operative, Alan, ended up terribly overworked in no time. The analysts and I had been off by a factor of THREE in the amount that was routinely being stolen by Halliburton from the CIA.

We did not find that out until the Halliburton people realized that they could get more money by making sure that Alan sold the goods for them. That meant Alan had to sell them at on average much higher than twice what they could get for them themselves, even by selling directly to the Russians. That was not as hard as it would have been with regular stolen goods; the Halliburton people did not know their true worth on the black market. Alan could make a better profit selling a document to a rich government such as France, which would have been very bad in the hands of the poorer Chinese or Russians. Before that, Halliburton had sold mainly to the Russians. [Editor: Further allegation that Halliburton has sold CIA secrets to the Russians].

The French were very helpful to us in keeping many things out of the hands of the Russians. They had wised up quickly as to our problem and how to assist us. The United Kingdom was less helpful because they could get that same information by merely filing a request for it.

The French were not as tight into the CIA, though they were still US allies. We needed top dollar for the stolen items because we had to make up for the fact that we were not selling off all of the items due to their national security risk. We were hiding the fact from Halliburton’s management that we were really sending the items back to the CIA.

OVER 50% OF HALLIBURTON SALES BREACHED NATIONAL SECURITY
We could not send computers back, as it was impossible to ensure that the Russians etc. had not altered them in the meantime. Those had to be scrubbed clean using a special erasing procedure. But it was possible to send back documents. We had initially thought that it would be only 10% of the items that had to be vetoed on national security grounds. But as we got a better understanding of what was being sold via Halliburton, that figure went up to a little over 50%

[Editor: More damning allegations against Halliburton as a continuing threat to US national security, for which Cheney should be impeached, along with Bush Jr., who authorised this corruption via his Executive Orders].

[The high-level operative and source for this information left the CIA for Canada in 2002].

Subsequently, operatives working inside the CIA to address this catastrophic situation] demanded that Tenet should lock the unvetted people out of the building.

In the process of showing how serious the security violations were, they revealed the oversight (or counterintelligence) operation against Tenet and Cheney themselves. That ended up revealing that they were recovering about 50% of the items and about 30% of their black market worth. Tenet informed Cheney of that fact, and Cheney ordered an end to the oversight.

I later sent copies of the relevant telephone calls revealing all this to the GAO. The Russians and Mossad had a complete set of White House calls, including of [calls concerning what was] for sale. The CIA also had a fairly complete set. When I was forced back into the CIA in October 2003 from Canada with threats and worse, I heard about the troubles that the oversight people had suffered over the intervening 16 months. They had been unable to perform oversight for four months.

During that time Halliburton had fired their Private Eyes, the ex-CIA operatives that they had there. Instead, Halliburton had hired its own experts on Black Market Intelligence Pricing and had sold all of the stolen items without regard to US national security. I then despatched over to the GAO about a dozen phone conversations by Halliburton’s high officials demonstrating their reckless disregard for national security and the lives of covert operatives. [Therefore, this information is all available for the Congressional Committee to access immediately: Editor].

But it now gets much, much worse….

THEFTS OF CIA COMPUTERS LEADING TO AN UNIMAGINABLE CATASTROPHE
The next part of the narrative briefing leads into a description of the most ghastly consequences, for which Vice President Richard B. Cheney is clearly indicated by the narrative to be responsible, given his Luciferian greed for ‘profit’ which of course is on its own an impeachable offence:

It was only after a [hitherto unreported: Ed.] colossal national security catastrophe that the [CIA operatives who had carried on trying to get results] managed to get Tenet to insist that Halliburton rehire their ex-CIA ‘Private Eyes’. The oversight people briefed me on [the catastrophe] as soon as I returned. The first day I came back to the CIA’s Headquarters, they kept me up all night telling me about it. I cried many times that night for my country and for the harm that had been done to her. I cried for the people who had died so brutally and unnecessarily.

Many, many more intelligence professionals lost their lives as a consequence of Cheney’s selling secrets than lost their lives because of the traitorous behaviour of Aldrich Ames. Ames is serving a life sentence for what he did. Cheney’s Halliburton people were still working at the CIA and were still stealing there because of Cheney’s protection of them. They were still walking inside the halls of the CIA every day and going into its offices to ‘have a chat’.

It was such an egregious violation of national security that some oversight members quit the CIA. Others said to me: ‘Why should we look like criminals who are enabling this theft’? ‘We are not making a cent off it… Yet we have been threatened by Tenet that we will be put in prison because we know of the thefts and hence must be guilty of them… We are being treated like criminals because we are trying to stop the most dangerous of these sales’.

[Editor: Gross abuse by Tenet of the Misprision of Felony Statute].

I later collected a memo from Cheney to Tenet which stated that the oversight of the sales by the CIA was cutting into profits and had to be stopped. It recommended imprisoning all of those in the CIA suspected of being a bottleneck in [the raking in of] US corporate profits. Tenet prohibited the oversight within a week of receiving that memo. The GAO has a copy of the memo and also of the memo that Tenet sent out threatening imprisonment if anyone was discovered to have decreased US corporate profits. They also have the later memorandum that Mr Tenet sent, which threatened imprisonment if anyone knew about stolen goods and did not report it to the designated official.

Those who had reported thefts to that official had been fired soon afterwards.

Thieves do not report stolen goods; people with integrity do, until it is clear that it is pointless and dangerous to do so. I also sent the GAO the document suggesting this ruse of a new designated official as a way to stop the oversight. That designated official never prosecuted a case of theft against a Halliburton person. He came from Halliburton! He had in fact been recommended for the job by ‘HallCIA’ to Cheney, who then recommended him for the job. I sent over to the GAO a tape of the phone conversation between ‘HallCIA’ and Cheney. On it. ‘HallCIA’ says that the man that he is recommending will stop the losses of revenues ‘from our CIA sales’.

HALLIBURTON CROOK BRAGGED ABOUT LUCRATIVE SALE TO THE RUSSIANS
Later he bragged about one of his sales to Russia of ‘one of our CIA products’, and says, ‘too bad we can’t make more of them’. It was clear that he was referring to the stolen goods that Halliburton stole from the CIA, not products that Halliburton made and sold to the CIA. The designated official was not vetted by the CIA. He was stealing from the CIA while working out of the Halliburton offices. I sent to the GAO a signed statement from a CIA security guard who caught him carrying a computer of the CIA’s out of the front door. That man could have employed the back door out of their offices manned only by Halliburton’s guards. He was so used to stealing from the CIA and getting away with it that he forgot, and used the front door.

That is what he told the guard: ‘I forgot… Give me a hand and we’ll take it out the back door’. The Halliburton guards did just that. They helped the Halliburton thieves load CIA computers into their private cars. I sent the GAO several CIA security camera clips of that happening.

The CIA had massive amounts of security camera data showing that [activity]. The CIA security people were afraid to report the thefts that they saw, because they did not want to lose their jobs without it even cleaning up the problem. By the time I returned to the CIA, 16 people had lost their jobs due to reporting thefts to the designated official that Tenet’s memo had directed them to use. No one at the CIA knew about the item sold during the blackout that caused the national security catastrophe, until after the catastrophe happened. [Details of this national security catastrophe, unfortunately containing graphic and disturbing language, now follow].

THE CATASTROPHE, COURTESY OF THE CORRUPTION OF TENET, CHENEY AND BUSH
The first sign of that Catastrophe [with a capital C: Ed] was a dead body lying on a sidewalk in a foreign city. The body had been the teenage daughter of a CIA officer. The body was no longer recognizable, even by her father. The body was identified definitively by dental records. Her face had been peeled off in small strips. The forensic evidence revealed that she was still able to bleed and struggle during most of the time that was done to her.

The next sign of the Catastrophe was another unrecognizable body. This time, of a 6-year-old boy of a US diplomat. The injuries were the same. The CIA concluded that the murderer was the same man. The next sign was an 11-year-old child of a US school teacher in Africa. She was divorced and her husband had once worked for the US State Department. Perhaps he had been CIA under diplomatic cover, but the CIA refused to comment.

I saw the photographs of the dead bodies. They were too horrible for words. Could it be that I was recalled to the CIA against my will in order to get my special operational skills to track down the villain? The day I got back to the CIA, the first thing Tenet did was hand me these pictures and ask me to find The Killer. He had given me the pictures of 23 victims who had all died the same way. All
of them were children of people who could have been in the CIA. About 22 of them did have a
known parent or guardian in the CIA.

DEATHS DUE TO THE STEALING OF A CIA COMPUTER
What he failed to tell me, or give me the photos for, for was the over 100 adults that had been killed using the exact same modus operandi. One of them was in the CIA’s morgue at that moment [Editor: did you know that the CIA has its own morgue? I didn’t]. ..The item that was stolen from the CIA that was responsible for those deaths was a computer. That computer had not gone through the hands of one of the ex-CIA operatives. Its contents not been thoroughly erased.

It took work and time to do that; the disc had to be erased and written over 50 times. Halliburton’s bosses did not care about national security or the risk to the CIA’s covert operatives, if they were exposed… I was able to prove that it was the same computer. It still had the CIA’s personnel files on it and many of the victims had been selectively deleted from where they should have been in that list. When I then compared that file to the CIA’s current personnel file, the comparison program marked those deletions in red. The selective deletions showed that the owner of the computer was getting tipped off by someone high up in the investigation of the deaths inside the CIA.

The US Administration managed to suppress the news of these murders almost completely, after its ties to the computer started showing up in the CIA’s internal investigations. No-one in the media had connected the isolated cases across the globe [another gross failure by the incompetent and controlled Fourth Estate, which has intelligence cadres sitting in its press rooms: Ed.].

The motivation of the deletions was obviously to try to cover-up the guilt of the owner’s role in those murders. There were about 86 deletions in a file of thousands of names. Each deletion was a victim, as already known by the CIA up to a certain date about two weeks earlier.

ENTER THE ‘DARK LORDS’: DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO BUSH
No victim that the CIA had on its investigation list by that point had failed to be deleted on that stolen computer. The odds of that happening by chance alone was practically speaking, exactly zero. In addition, I later obtained evidence that firmly tied the secondary ownership of that same computer to those who committed the actual tortures and murders. There was many more than one murderer. What they had in common was membership in a kind of paramilitary, quasi-religious cult. The members of that paramilitary cult had a group commitment to kill a person once a month. The Mafia usually only requires its members to kill once to get into it. This satanic group required their members to kill once a month in order to remain in good standing in it.

[Note: The Editor of this service received, between February and mid-May 2008, a large number of evil, unsolicited phone calls from a contrived, deep demonic ‘voice’ referencing ‘the Great Dark Lords’. This harassment [referenced in our report dated 27th April 2010, as the stupid harassment resumed: we have identified the operative concerned as Wanta] continued until shortly after we reported the matter to the head of the US Anti-Terrorism Task Force and also, separately, to law enforcement personnel in contact with the Editor’s own contacts, whereupon they ceased. We have voice recordings of almost all these calls.

Considered in the context of what follows, it would appear that these calls represented threats: one of these was quite specific, along the lines of ‘we have the means of dealing with you’. Given the appearance of the ‘Dark Lords’ in this ‘Cheney’ context, it is likely that the Unterreichsführer’s apparat will indeed, as we suspected, have been responsible for these multiple telephone threats and harassment calls.

It comes as NO SURPRISE whatsoever to the Editor that the veteran CIA investigator came across this ‘Black’ dimension. The harassment calls to the Editor were also interspersed with threatening emails. The content of one of these, containing a very grave threat, was conveyed immediately as referenced above, with the consequence that (at the date of this posting) the harassment ceased].

A Manual on ‘How to Please the Lords of Darkness’ had been published by a member of that cult. It recommended that the best way to do it was to torture people to death using the modus operandi that I have indicated above. That Manual had been distributed by the owner of the aforementioned computer with that CIA Personnel file suggested as the targets. The man who bought the computer was indeed a paramilitary type, with a large collection of weapons, many of them unregistered… He was identified as a fundraiser for Bush.

The literature of the group showed upside-down crosses as an emblem [satanic symbolism: Ed.]. The reason that others in the CIA had not tracked him down and had failed to pin the instigating of the murders on him, was political. Like ‘HallCIA’, and the Head Programmer from our earlier cases, he was well protected. It was not that CIA investigators had not suspected him. It was that they did not know what to do with their suspicions and even their evidence after they got it.

I was the booby prize winner: the fool at the CIA who had before been willing to buck the silence at great risk to myself. There was precedence for giving me a job like this. At one point, a CIA officer had sold a list of MI6 officers to the KGB during the Cold War. The KBG had started killing them off. I was given the job to stop them from continuing. And they had stopped: whether or not it was due to my efforts, was a matter of hot debate within the CIA. But some people credited me with having had some influence in the matter.

The individual who bought that computer was apparently a friend of Cheney and Bush; they had invited him to the White House. They had been present when he picked it out among a number of other CIA stolen computers, paying cash, which Cheney had put in his pocket.

‘CHENEY & BUSH TOOK THE MONEY FOR THE COMPUTERS USED FOR THE MURDERS’
I found the White House Security camera footage of that event. The GAO has a copy of it. The payment is shown on the video. The man took hundred dollar bill(s) out of his pocket and handed that to Bush. Bush hesitated and then handed the money to Cheney. The footage of that computer being carried out of the room by a guard follows about 20 minutes later. The room had about 20 computers from the CIA in it, to start with. [They were all neatly laid out, as at a corporate sales demonstration, for buyers to examine, test, select, and pay for: only cash was accepted: Ed.].

The security camera tape shows Bush Jr. and Mr Cheney repeatedly coming into the room with a prospective buyer and taking cash in varying amounts. That continued until all the computers were gone. Some prospective buyers remained in the room for over an hour exploring the contents of the stolen CIA computers, before deciding on a purchase. I checked with the CIA and found that no CIA vetting of those buyers had occurred. Most did not have security clearances. Some of them had prior felony convictions and had been allowed into the White House ‘on orders from above’. The sale was ‘by invitation only’, with Bush and Cheney controlling the invitation list.

The earlier tape shows Cheney directing Halliburton employees in where to set the computers up. Much care and time was taken to plug them in and connect them to monitors, mice, keyboards, and to arrange the room nicely with a mouse pad under each mouse. The GAO has a copy of that tape too. The manual on how to torture people (in the manner described) and the file of CIA Personnel was sent overseas and domestically through the mail whenever a buyer purchased a snuff film from that man. His poorly kept records showed that he had mailed out at least 2,000 such CDs with the Manual on ‘How to please the Lords of Darkness’.

His records omitted the addresses that he sent them to in about 50% of the cases where he marked payment received and product and ‘How-to’ sent. Thirty of the murders had been solved already by local foreign authorities by the time I was given the case. Of those, the ‘How-to’ CD was found in 28 of them. Presumably it had been overlooked in the other two, or the wrong party may have been charged, or the ‘How-to’ thrown out by the ‘Black’ criminal operative.

Unfortunately, the murders had continued after those arrests.

BUSH AND CHENEY RESPONSIBLE FOR 168 CIA DEATHS, COVERED UP (HITHERTO)
At least 168 CIA officers and their family members were brutally tortured to death as a direct result of this cynical corruption run by Bush and Cheney. The CIA [systematically] covered it all up and pretended that it never happened on Tenet’s orders. The notorious traitor Aldrich Ames had not
sent out instructions to torture and kill anyone. He had sold ONE copy of a list of CIA operatives
in one country to one buyer. He is languishing in prison for life.

[The perpetrator identified here] sent out over 2,000 copies of all the names and addresses of the CIA officers and their families in every country. He had sent them out with hate propaganda and incited others to kill them. He had sent this [Nazi filth] to people who were known murderers who had a commitment to kill again. And he had sent it out as a challenge: are you man enough to kill a CIA person? His group offered ‘Advanced Membership Privileges’ to anyone who succeeded.

It was very curious that someone close and high up in the investigations at the CIA was tipping him off, since he was targeting CIA officers. I was able to supply the GAO with the evidence as to who was doing it. This person was getting calls and faxes directly from Cheney and Tenet. Tenet’s faxes included the names of the victims to date. He was being assisted in his cover-up at a very high US level. I investigated whether the Russians or another foreign group had put him up to this, as his methods seemed too effective to be that of an individual’ alone.

HALLIBURTON LINKED TO THESE MURDERS OF CIA PERSONNEL
I found no such evidence of a foreign government or its operatives being behind it [but] I found many ties to US underworld organizations. Most of the ties, however, were directly to Halliburton. According to Halliburton’s records which I sent the GAO, [the perpetrator of these incitements to murder CIA personnel] had headed one of their subsidiaries before it went bankrupt.

CIA INVESTIGATOR TOLD TO ‘BACK OFF, OR ELSE’
When I looked up that old corporation I did not find a building on the aerial to correspond to the address. That subsidiary had been selling intelligence and paramilitary gear. It had specialized in recruiting mercenaries worldwide. It made me wonder if those killing the CIA had done so, as a kind of recruitment test; those getting away with it and being able to prove it, getting the job. I started looking into whether he was on Halliburton’s books as CEO of a new subsidiary. Just as soon as I started that investigation, Cheney called and told me to ‘back off or else’.

I asked him what the ‘else’ referred to, because it certainly sounded like a death threat to me. He hung up on me. Then he called me back about 10 minutes later and offered to set up a face-to-face meeting with that computer owner. I agreed and asked at once for a time and a place. He hung up: apparently his offer was just to threaten me that he would [impose] that man on me. I sent copies of those calls to the GAO also. They should still have them. The Halliburton mercenary recruiter [who incited the murders] was never prosecuted. Cheney and Bush would not allow it.

BIO-FEEDBACK EQUIPMENT STOLEN BY HALLIBURTON FOR THE RUSSIANS
In about May 2002, a Halliburton person at the CIA had stolen an expensive piece of equipment.
It was an ultra-sophisticated CIA bio-feedback machine that was worth over $5 million.

It had required hundreds of millions of dollars of R & D money for the CIA to develop it. It was custom-made only for the CIA. Its only purpose was to train operatives how to pass a lie detector test. It was only used when they were to be sent on extremely dangerous missions to places like Russia. And it was only used in very critical missions.

There was a high risk that Russian intelligence would figure out how to overcome that training, if they interrogated about five operatives who had used it. That is, if they realised that those 5 had been trained in that fashion. Thus it was TOP SECRET and its manual was also top secret at the time. Loss of that machine and its Manual was the same as potentially losing every secret a given CIA official had in his or her mind when they were in Russia. The head of the CIA station in Russia had been trained on that machine for obvious reasons.

The effect of the training was to give the user control over their automatic nervous system. That meant that they could stop their fear, their sweating, their heart rate increase etc. in response to an interrogation. In addition to those obvious advantages in an interrogation situation, it had a big psychological benefit. It gave those who had used it confidence that they could pass a lie detector test. Thus, they were as if ‘bullet proofed’ against threats and lie detector tests.

Although the signal-to-noise ratio relating to information obtained under torture is so low as to be unusable, that is not true in a ‘friendly’ interrogation. The British had admirably demonstrated the effectiveness of ‘friendly interrogations’ in WWII. An operative who had fear or fear of a lie detector test was more likely to ‘tell all’ in a ‘friendly interrogation’ because of underlying anxiety. I did not find out about that theft until the next day. I then learned from a Halliburton person that it had been stolen and was en route to the Russian Embassy to be sold to them. I was absolutely horrified by the national security implications of that. I rushed up to Tenet’s office to tell him. He already knew.

Cheney had called him and asked him what it was and what it was worth to the Russians. This was after I had set up the system for things to go through Alan so that the oversight committee could intervene to stop the worst violations of national security.

But the thief was a personal friend of Cheney’s and had taken the item straight to the White House to ask him if he wanted to buy it. Cheney had paid him $50,000 for it, he informed me. The copy of the telephone call that I sent to the GAO between Tenet and Cheney showed that Mr Cheney had considered keeping it, so that he could pass lie detector tests.

CHENEY THREATENS TO KILL THE VETERAN CIA OPERATIVE PERSONALLY
They had discussed it and Tenet had promised to find out more about it, how it worked, and how much it was ‘worth outside of the CIA’. He had called him back and told him a figure of $1.2 million. Cheney asked him to find out what was his risk of needing the machine himself. Tenet called him back and said that CIA analysts judged his risk to be about 4%. In front of Tenet with his phone on
speaker, I called Cheney and demanded its return.

He laughed and said, ‘What’s the big deal? It can only be used 5 times total and it has already been used once. We should sell it while it still has value before those 5 times are up’. He had absolutely no understanding of intelligence matters. It was not 5 uses of the machine: it was 5 times a CIA person trained using that machine was interrogated by the Russians. It could be 20 years’ worth of use to prevent the loss of security codes, national secrets, and how a CIA station was operating.

I explained it all quite carefully as Cheney is not a technically minded person. I even asked him questions to make certain that he had understood what I said correctly [Editor: This interesting comment suggests that Cheney is actually not that bright, which may also be judged to be the case, given his behaviour over the Settlements and his repeated thefts of gigantic sums of money. It may be that he progressed to these much larger thefts after getting away with multiple lesser thefts of which examples have been given in this narrative]. Cheney then said: ‘Well, what difference does it make since there are remote viewers like you in Russia who can steal the secrets anyway?’

I then explained that remote viewers were not 100% accurate and that intelligence agencies always had to verify what they said using hard data. Lie detector tests are not 100% accurate either, but they add some signal-to-noise benefit. Mr Cheney replied that torture was generally worthless in getting information [Editor: Amazing! Was not Cheney reported to be adamant that torture MUST be used to extract intelligence from terrorists and from prisoners in US hell holes like Gantanamo and Abu Ghraib?]. That was true. But it was still wrong to sell the Russians the CIA’s very best and most advanced equipment to deter loss of information under interrogation. ‘Friendly interrogations’ do yield valid intelligence.

When I pointed that out, Cheney said that the machine had already been sold to the Russians and that I was too late. I told him that I would figure out some way of prosecuting him, if he ever did that again. He laughed and said, ‘You haven’t got a chance’. I told him that I would try.

Cheney then said: ‘I will kill you myself, if you ever get close to succeeding’.

As we have said before, Cheney is what Malachi Martin would have called ‘perfectly possessed’.

RUSSIA TREATED AS ‘THE ENEMY’ THROUGHOUT: RAPPROCHEMENT IS THEREFORE FALSE
You will have noticed that during the timeframe of this narrative [2002-2005-ish], Russia is considered in this dialogue to be an enemy, just as was the case during the overt Cold War.

This reflects the fact that the dialectical breach created by Lenin’s Revolution and its aftermath has not, in fact, been healed or discarded: exactly as the Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn advised the disinterested CIA: see The Perestroika Deception by Anatoliy Golitsyn, edited by Christopher Story, available from the books [Edward Harle Limited] segment of this website.

ADD-ONS AND UPDATES ORIGINALLY APPENDED AT THE TOP OF THIS REPORT:

• NEW: LETTER FROM VIENNA: BULLSEYE PERSPECTIVES ON THE GERMAN CRISIS: SPEECHES IN THE BUNDESTAG LAMENT THE IMMINENT FAILURE OF THE PAN-GERMAN PROJECT TO CONTROL EUROPE: THEY COULDN’T CARE LESS ABOUT THE PLIGHT OF THE FAILING SATRAP E.U. STATES. ALL THEY CARE ABOUT IS THE FACT THAT THEIR PROJECT IS COLLAPSING, NOCH EINMAL: LIKE EVERY PREVIOUS ATTEMPT THEY HAVE MADE TO TAKE OVER AND CONTROL EUROPE. THE PAN-GERMANS (DVD) ARE A MENACE TO EUROPEAN AND GLOBAL STABILITY. SEE THIS ADD-0N TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION CORRUPTION SECTION, WHICH FOLLOWS THE UPDATES IMMEDIATELY BELOW.

• BEFORE WE START: YOUNGEST SON OF LAWYER JOHN HEMENWAY, WHO BROUGHT A QUO WARRANTO ACTION AGAINST OBAMA, WAS SHOT DEAD IN BEDFORD, VIRGINIA ON 30TH APRIL. THE U.S. CRIMINAL GOVERNMENT’S CONTROLLING INTELLIGENCE POWER IS PREPARED EVEN TO LIE ITS WAY OUT OF THIS ASSASSINATION. MEMORIAL DETAILS ARE GIVEN BELOW.

The first information that we published about this shooting was as follows [3rd May 2010]:

The Editor has just received the following flash information from an impeccable US source whom he has known personally for the best part of two decades:

‘I just heard that John Hemenway’s younger son, also named John, was shot to death outside Bedford, Virginia. John Hemenway is the attorney who filed the Quo Warranto lawsuit against Obama. I just got off the phone and there’s an autopsy going on…’.

The Editor writes: We were originally advised that the Memorial is on 5th May, but this information has been updated: it’s on the 4th. We are in touch with parties quite close to the family and as the matter is so extremely sensitive, we are holding back on further details until we can obtain the go-ahead, if that is granted. In the meantime, here’s the Memorial announcement:

HEMENWAY JOHN MARTIN HEMENWAY (Age 47) On April 30, 2010 of Bedford, VA. Beloved husband of 7 years to Stephanie; loving father of Andrew Branham Hemenway; devoted son of John and Betty Hemenway; beloved brother of Catherine and Edward Siewick, Jane and John Sullivan, David and Margaret Hemenway and Fielding Williams. Pre-deceased by his beloved sister Mary Joyce Hemenway Williams. Also survived by many loving nieces, nephews, relatives and friends.

Memorial Service on Tuesday, May 4, at 4:30 p.m. at Otterville United Methodist Church, Bedford, VA. In lieu of flowers memorials may be made to the John M. Hemenway Camp CHILD Scholarship for special needs children c/o Bedford Primary School, 807 College Street, Bedford, VA 24523.

• NOTE: Late on Monday 3rd May 2010, the link count for our report ‘ALL UK LEGISLATION PASSED SINCE 2000 IS NULL AND VOID’ reached 33,700, after being frozen at 27,500 for days.

• UPDATE:
WAXMAN’S HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE PUTS HALLIBURTON IN THE FIRING LINE WITH RESPECT TO (OUR) SUSPICIONS CONCERNING THE FAULTY CEMENTING PROCESS. SEE BELOW FOR THE TEXT OF MR HENRY A. WAXMAN’S LETTER TO MR DAVID J. LESAR, C.E.O. OF HALLIBURTON CO., DATED 30TH APRIL 2010, DEMANDING ALL DOCUMENTS.

• UPDATE: HALLIBURTON HAD ONLY JUST FINISHED A CEMENTING JOB ON THE OIL RIG:
READ THIS AND THEN READ WHAT WE SAID BELOW BEFORE THIS DATA BECAME AVAILABLE:
Although no cause has been determined, oil services contractor Halliburton Inc. says it finished a cementing operation 20 hours before a Gulf of Mexico rig went up in flames.

Halliburton is named as a defendant in most of the more than two dozen lawsuits filed by Gulf Coast people and businesses claiming the huge oil spill could ruin them financially. In one lawsuit, two Louisiana shrimpers claim cementing contributed to the explosion.

Halliburton said Friday [30th April 2010] it had four workers stationed on the rig, performing several tasks, including cementing, a process of applying cement and water to a pipe used to prevent the wall of the hole from caving in during drilling.

According to a 2007 study by Minerals Management Service, cementing was a factor in 18 of 39 rig blowouts in the Gulf between 1992 and 2006. San Francisco Chronicle:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/04/30/financi…

See also The Wall Street Journal:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703572504575214593564769072.html

* PLUS: Halliburton buys Oil Fire Fighting company on April 12th for $240 Million

In 1978, Edward “Coots” Matthews and Asger “Boots” Hansen founded Boots & Coots (WEL). Both were veteran oil-well firefighters. But the days of independence have come to an end for Boots & Coots as the company has agreed to sell out to Halliburton (HAL) for $240.4 million. Shareholders will get $1.73 in cash and $1.27 in Halliburton stock for every share of Boots & Coots.

• SO, IT WASN’T PREMEDITATED SABOTAGE TO SPITE THE BRITS, GIVEN WHAT’S BEEN GOING ON FINANCIALLY BEHIND THE SCENES AS THE CRIMINALS ARE BEING FACED DOWN? ASK CHENEY…. And read all about Halliburton’s scamming of the CIA and the Pentagon, and the national security breaches committed by Halliburton in the process, under Cheney’s watch, below.

• WAXMAN’S HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE PUTS HALLIBURTON IN THE FIRING LINE WITH RESPECT TO (OUR) SUSPICIONS CONCERNING THE FAULTY CEMENTING PROCESS. SEE BELOW FOR THE TEXT OF MR HENRY A. WAXMAN’S LETTER TO MR DAVID J. LESAR, C.E.O. OF HALLIBURTON CO., DATED 30TH APRIL 2010, DEMANDING ALL DOCUMENTS.

HENRY A. WAXMAN, CALIFORNIA, CHAIRMAN
JOE BARTON, TEXAS, RANKING MEMBER
COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE
Congress of the United States
House of Representatives
2125 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515-6115

Majority: (202) 225 2927
Minority: (202) 225 3641

April 30, 2010-05-04

Mr David J. Lesar
Halliburton Co.
US Corporate Headquarters
3000 North Sam Houston Parkway East
Houston, Texas 77032

Dear Mr Lesar

According to a report in The Wall Street Journal today, one possible cause of the explosion that destroyed the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig and led to the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico could be a problem with the cementing that was supposed to seal the well. In this procedure, cement is used to plug the well and to fill gaps between the well pipe and the hole drilled into the ocean floor in order to prevent combustible oil and gas from escaping. Problems with the cementing process have frequently been identified as causes of oil well blowouts. The article quoted one independent expert who said: “The initial likely cause of gas coming to the surface had something to do with the cement” (1). Halliburton Co. provided cementing services for the Deepwater Horizon rig.

As part of the Committee’s investigation into the cause of the oil spill, we ask that you take three steps. First, we request that you arrange a briefing on May 5, 2010, for Committee staff with Halliburton officials knowledgeable about Halliburton’s cementing activities at the Deepwater Horizon rig.

Second, we ask you to provide the Committee with all documents in Halliburton’s possession relating to (1) the explosion at the Deepwater Horizon rig; (2) the possibility or risk of an explosion or blowout at the Deepwater Horizon rig; and (3) the status, adequacy, quality, monitoring, and inspection of the cementing work relating to the Deepwater Horizon rig. We request that you provide these documents on May 7, 2010. An attachment to this letter provides additional information on how to respond to Committee document requests.

Third, we ask that you preserve for potential future production to the Committee all documents relating to Halliburton’s operations at and involvement with the Deepwater Horizon rig.

We appreciate your assistance with the Committee’s investigation. We believe it is essential that the spill and its causes are thoroughly investigated. If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact Meredith Fuchs of the Committee staff at (202) 226-2424.

Sincerely,

[Signed]
Henry A. Waxman, Chairman

[Signed]
Bart Stupak
Chairman, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations

Enclosure.

cc. The Honorable Joe Barton, Ranking Member
The Honorable Michael Burgess, Ranking Member,
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.

(1) Drilling Process Attracts Scrutiny in Rig Explosion, The Wall Street Journal, April 30, 2010.

• Note: The oil rig issue and Halliburton’s scamming operations follow our exposure of parallel institutionalised corruption at the European Commission, subject of the Editor’s speech.

NOTICES:
Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

Save

WORLD REVOLUTION AGENTUR AT EACH OTHER’S THROATS

chrisstory

THEY SHAMELESSLY SCREAM VENEMOUS HATRED IN FRONT OF THE TV CAMERAS

Thursday 22 April 2010 03:00

• UPDATE RE: ‘ALL UK LEGISLATION PASSED SINCE 2000 IS NULL AND VOID’:
You may be interested to know that even without having this (UK) report up front on the website, the links count for it at 15:38 hrs on 24th April 2010 had leapt to 8,550, and at 17:00 to 8,990 links. Compare these data with the links summaries to be found at the foot of the report [see: Archive].

• At 12:00 hrs on 25th April, the total number of links to that report had reached 9,600.

• At 07:51 hrs on 26th April, the total number of links to that report had reached 10,500.

• BEHIND THE SHUT-DOWN OF BRITISH AND EUROPEAN AIRSPACE

• THE KGB OFFICER WHO CLOSED DOWN OUR AIRSPACE

• PRECISE ‘COINCIDENTAL TIMING’ OF A NATO AIR FORCE EXERCISE HOSTED BY GERMANY

• CORRUPT KGB BACKGROUND OF THE EUROPEAN TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER

• HISTORICAL DATA ON ICELANDIC VOLCANIC ERUPTIONS

• CENTRAL BANK OF HAITI ‘REPLACES’ CENTRAL BANK OF IRAQ
FOR WHITE HOUSE FINANCIAL SCAMMING PURPOSES

• AIRSPACE SHUTDOWN: A DIRECT WARNING TO THE UNITED STATES RE THE SETTLEMENTS

• SUCCESSFUL ‘TEST’ BY COVERT SOVIETS AND
THEIR COVERT ‘BLACK’ GERMAN INTELLIGENCE PARTNERS

• IRAN PROVIDES CONTROLLED ‘PRETEXT’ FOR NATO OVERTURES TOWARDS RUSSIA

•THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION: TWEEDLEDUM
AND TWEEDLDUMBER: PLUS THE FOREIGN OFFICE ATHEIST

• THE INCOMING GOVERNMENT’S LEGISLATION MAY BE
NULL AND VOID, LIKE ALL UNITED KINGDOM LAWS SINCE 2000

• THE FIVE-POINTED STAR CLUE TO THE FACT THAT
THE BRITISH ELECTION IS A STAGED THEATRICAL DISPLAY

• OBSERVATIONS IN THE BRITISH ‘MAINSTREAM’ PRESS ON 22ND APRIL 2010

• BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY CONFIRMED AS A GERMAN ‘BLACK OPERATION’

• THE BRUTAL COVERT SOVIET CONTAINMENT OF POLAND

• FRAU ANGELA MERKEL GOES EVERYWHERE IN EUROPE EXCEPT TO POLAND

• THE THREE INTELLIGENCE RACKETEERS BEHIND THE CRISIS

• THE SORDID BACKGROUND OF DR HELMUT KOHL

• CANADIAN PRIME MINSTER HARPER REPORTED TO BE ‘SPACED OUT’

• NEIL BUSH IN CHARGE OF BUSH SR.’S ASSETS?

• NEIL BUSH AND THE SAVINGS AND LOAN PILLAGING OPERATION

• NOTHING’S CHANGED, OF COURSE: LOOK AT NANCY PELOSI

• NOW THEY’VE STARTED SCREAMING AT EACH OTHER IN PUBLIC

• SACKED SARKOZY ‘SPIN DOCTOR’ CONFIRMS THAT ‘IT’S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY’

• SO WHAT WAS SARKOZY’S ‘FORMER’ SPIN DOCTOR SAYING, EXACTLY?

• DIARY OF RECENT UNSPEAKABLE BEHIND-THE-SCENES EVENTS

• THEY ARE AVOIDING THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM

• GREECE AND PORTUGAL POISED TO DESTROY THE EURO

• WE WARNED THIS WOULD HAPPEN IN THE RUN-UP TO 1999: IT’S ON THE RECORD

• THE IMF’S DOUBLE-TAXATION PROPOSAL FOR BANKS

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

• AS PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED, OUR LANDLINES REMAIN CLOSED BECAUSE OF UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT. WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL OR THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

INTRODUCTION
In recent days, your correspondent has suffered moments of wondering whether it wouldn’t be more profitable for him to shuffle off this mortal coil in exchange, should he be so elected, for a perch in Abraham’s Bosom, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt and where serpents don’t slither, either. The thought of having to record the slitherings of these iniquitous serpents one moment longer suddenly struck him as beyond obnoxious.

However, as the former Thatcher era Cabinet Minister, Michael Heseltine, pronounced as he stalked out of the Cabinet and Downing Street into a posse of reporters and TV cameras, ‘a man’s gotta do what a man’s gotta do’. So we shall slog on, exposing these rats until you can hear them squealing, like Goldman Sachs, for the rest of eternity.

So many slitherings have taken place since we last reported, that you have a rich menu of snakeish behaviour to choose from here. We’ve arranged the manifestations in no particular order, so you can start wherever you like. But if you read the text as presented, you’ll find that it all ‘connects’.

BEHIND THE SHUT-DOWN OF BRITISH AND EUROPEAN AIRSPACE
On 18th April, various Labour Cabinet Ministers emerged from Number 10 Downing Street, having rarely been seen before, to utter empty platitudes for the benefit of the BBC et al. concerning the small matter of the comprehensive no-fly zone that suddenly descended upon the British Isles and northern Europe due to an erupting unpronounceable volcano in Iceland.

Their sudden ‘workmanlike’ appearance admittedly made a change to the wall-to-wall emissions of hot air emitted by the political party leaders as they competed among each other for screen space and to pontificate with contrived emphasis on every single subject under the sun except those that matter: Britain’s corrosive and wasteful membership of the corrupt European Union Collective; the catastrophic financial shambles that this Labour Government, like all its predecessors, has inflicted on the country; and the scandalous ongoing commitment of British military forces to the agentur’s internationalist agendas which have nothing whatsoever to do with the United Kingdom’s national interests (which long since have been collectivised) but everything to do, at present, with the perpetuation and consolidation of such grossly demonic activities as the criminalised American Intelligence Power’s drug-trafficking operations in Afghanistan.

Among the Ministers thus suddenly on display was the Rothschild agent and notorious Europhile, Lord Mandelson, who let slip words to the effect that ‘we can’t just do as we like (over the airport shutdowns): there are (European rules) to be abided by’. Ah, so we take our sovereign airspace control orders nowadays from the European Union Collective.

This reality gradually sank into a few brainwashed BBC talking heads when various previously unheard of Belgians, Italians and East European types started appearing at staged ‘European’ press conferences, gesticulating, wagging their fingers, and generally exhibiting traits along with their broken English so alien to the British way of doing things, that it was immediately clear that they were, like our vacuous British political leads, mouthing empty verbiage in order to convey the false impression that they were ‘doing something’ – which is to say, justifying their own extremely expensive existence financed inter alia by the scammed British taxpayer.

THE KGB OFFICER WHO CLOSED DOWN OUR AIRSPACE
Then, all of a sudden, Lord Mandelcreep’s observation about ‘having to adhere to European rules’ slotted into place. For who should appear, complete with short moustache and well-brushed hair, than the KGB (FSB) officer, Siim Kallas, whose latest metamorphosis, after having ‘served’ in the preceding Barroso Commission, is as the new European Transport Commissioner.

Now this Mr Kallas has a colourfully corrupt KGB history, as will be explained below. But as soon as this KGB operative surfaced, full of bonhomie and sweet reasonableness, the true significance of Mandelson’s carelessly purposeful remark for the TV cameras became clear.

Whether the skies over Britain and Europe are open for commercial air traffic is in the gift, you see, of the covert ongoing Soviet KGB, i.e. of Soviet Military Intelligence (Glavnoye Rzvedyvatelnoye Upravleniye, or the GRU).

The process whereby the covert Soviet Union, having been deceptively ‘dismantled’ under the guidance of that supreme Leninist strategist, Mikhail Gorbachëv, who continues as before, working from a suite of offices in the Kremlin, was carefully dissected and explained for all to comprehend in the Editor’s book The European Union Collective [2002]. Gorbachëv always follows V. I. Lenin’s precise dicta, one of the more obscure of which is: ‘Separation precedes federation’.

In other words, what this episode (which completely disrupted this Editor’s schedule of course) has demonstrated is that the British authorities are so spineless, brainwashed, weak and gutless that they are prepared to push many airlines to the brink of actual bankruptcy, to cause prospectively catastrophic disruption to the mails, to inflict near-death blows on innumerable UK categories of businesses, and to risk a sharp escalation of unemployment – all for the sake of not saying boo to the sacred, pungent cow called ‘Europe’.

And what Soviet Military Intelligence has been able to confirm is that it’s not necessary to do much in order to disrupt Western European economies other than to exploit an existing natural disaster (IF that’s what the unpronounceable volcanic eruption is) in order to procure the grounding of all commercial aircraft and the associated economic and financial consequences.

And if commercial air traffic can be grounded in such a fashion, then of course the same may very well apply to military flights as well. For they were indeed grounded, too.

PRECISE ‘COINCIDENTAL TIMING’ OF A NATO AIR FORCE EXERCISE HOSTED BY GERMANY
Which is NOT academic, because this episode ‘just happened’ to coincide with a NATO air force exercise, conveniently hosted by Germany, running in parallel with the crisis – namely, from 12th to the 22nd of April. It’s quite possible that the commercial airline lockdown even formed part of this exercise. Whatever the precise explanation, the coincidences here are highly suspicious. It is not necessary to recall in addition that ELF (Extremely Low Frequency) waves can be used to disturb a volcano, while scalar waves can be deployed to manipulate the weather so that the volcanic ash does not circulate according to normal patterns, to conclude that a secret test to establish with what ‘efficiency’ northern Europe’s airspace can be shut down, has been an unqualified success.

Contributing to that success will have been suitably ‘technical’ regulations developed by the corrupt European Commission specifically in anticipation of such an exercise, which has proved that the entire airspace of northern Europe can be shut down BY REGULATORY FIAT.

CORRUPT KGB BACKGROUND OF THE EUROPEAN TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER
Now let’s look at the background of the European Transport Commissioner, Mr Siim Kallas.

In 1992, this KGB operative had been posted to function as Chairman of the Bank of Estonia, having previously been in charge of that state-owned bank’s administration.

In the spring of 1992, Estonia received back 11.4 tons of gold from the Bank of England. This gold, always Estonia’s property, had been shipped to London on 17th June 1940 for ‘safekeeping’, ahead of the Nazi occupation of the Baltic States. Estonia’s exiled government reached a ‘gentleman’s agreement’ with the British Government of the day, under which the gold stocks would be held for Estonia’s disposal but would only be returned to a free and independent Estonia, the British having never recognised the occupation of Estonia by the Soviets.

Indicative of the fact that the British Foreign Office assumed, in its arrogance, that ‘collapsible Communism’ was for real, rather than the Leninist strategic deception that it really was, the gold was duly handed back after 52 years and was to be used to back the new Estonian kroon.

But in 1993 under Siim Kallas, the Bank of Estonia, using the gold as collateral, secretly arranged the transfer via a third party of $10 million from the Bank to a Swiss institution, under a contract supposedly involving dividends from oil trades (1), (2).

The Bank of Estonia was not the beneficiary of income generated from the $10.0 million ‘seed money’. Nor did the anonymous beneficiaries provide any guarantees for the safe return of the alienated capital to the Bank of Estonia, and neither did they bear any of the attendant liabilities.

Of course the money vanished, along with the Fraudulent Finance income that it had generated.

As KGB and CIA officers do, Kallas ‘moved on’, into ‘politics’ in fact, founding the ‘Reform Party’, which was quickly merged into the government coalition, with Kallas being installed as Minister of Finance (since a demand from the KGB cannot be refused).

In September 1998, Siim Kallas and his adviser Urmas Kaju, went on trial for investing public money without the authority of the Council of the Bank of Estonia.

The pair were further accused of causing material loss to the people of Estonia by attempting to divert interest from the unauthorised investment. In addition, they were accused of theft, while Kallas was accused of corruptly misusing his authority. The journal Central European Review confirmed that Kallas was convicted on these charges, although the convictions were overturned on appeal. One charge of furnishing false information was referred back to lower courts; and on 30th October 2000, the four-year criminal case against Mr Kallas came to a halt when the lower court acquitted this KGB operative on the ‘minor’ outstanding charge.

A former Estonian MP and doctor of law, Mr Ando Leps, who has written extensively about this corruption, claims that Kallas was at the centre of other financial problems at the Bank of Estonia. Throughout the legal process, Kallas’ representative was Indrek Teder, law partner with Märt Rask, Justice Minister in the Estonian Government and Chairman of the Estonian Supreme Court. And by an even happier ‘coincidence’, Rask was also a member of the ‘Reform Party’, of which Kallas was the self-appointed founder and leader (3).

Other details of this scam, involving offshore accounts in Delaware, clearly implying that Kallas and friends became enmeshed in Bush Crime Family-style offshore Fraudulent Finance trading illicit operations, could be related; but enough has been said to confirm that Siim Kallas was hardly an appropriate choice for the post of European Anti-Fraud Commissioner, awarded to him by the little Portuguese EU capo, José Manuel Barroso, President of the corrupt European Commission, when assembling his first ‘Administration’.

When Barroso came to shuffle his unaccountable and generally corrupt placemen for his second Commission (each European Commission has a life-span of six years), he appointed the KGB/FSB officer, Siim Kallas, as European Transport Commissioner. Or to be more precise, it was ‘pointed out’ to Barroso that this would be the post to which Kallas should be ‘appointed’.

HISTORICAL DATA ON ICELANDIC VOLCANIC ERUPTIONS
In June 1783, an Icelandic volcano named Laki erupted, opening a fissure 15 miles long, which spewed out tons of lava, dust and acidic, poisonous gases, for eight months.

Most of Iceland’s sheep and cattle died from eating contaminated grass, while some 25% of the population died of starvation or inhalation of toxic fumes. A thick, poisonous fog descended over much of Europe. The sun faded and thunderstorms proliferated in the gloom. Many people died, with a recent survey of parish records in Britain having concluded that some 11,500 additional deaths, above the norm, occurred in 1783, probably triggered by heart and lung disease.

This was, in fact, the greatest natural disaster to have occurred in Britain in recorded history, apart from epidemics, especially the plague. It is reckoned that 100,000 people would die in Britain if such an event were to occur today (5).

The preceding eruption of the Eyjafjallajokökull volcano began in 1821 and lasted well into 1823, with the ash-fall at its heaviest after six months (6).

Having followed the slitherings of the serpent for so long, we know, do we not, that no abomination is beyond the criminal kleptocracy.

Since, as indicated above, volcanic eruptions (and ‘earthquakes’) can be triggered by Extremely Low Frequency waves, the Dark Forces concerned have also, no doubt, satisfied themselves that, in addition to procuring the knee-jerk grounding of all commercial aircraft in Britain and northern Europe, a volcanic natural disaster capable of plunging Britain, part of the ‘Main Enemy’, back into the Dark Ages, ‘can always be arranged’.

CENTRAL BANK OF HAITI ‘REPLACES’ CENTRAL BANK OF IRAQ
FOR WHITE HOUSE FINANCIAL SCAMMING PURPOSES
Likewise, earthquakes could be arranged so as to devastate Port-au-Prince, Haiti, destroying a quarter of a million lives in the process – enabling the criminalist cadres within the US structures to seize de facto control of the Central Bank of Haiti – for corrupt ‘insider’ trading purposes. For the Central Bank of Haiti now performs the same function as the Central Bank of Iraq, which used to be the White House’s controlled ‘independent’ central bank, used for all manner of irregular, below-the-radar financial transactions via the Federal Inter Bank Settlement Fund that’s controlled by the Federal Reserve Board. But with the ‘democratic independence’ of Iraq assuming tentative, albeit of course fragile, reality, that particular corrupt game had to be wound down. So the White House needed another ‘captive’ central bank to replace the Central Bank of Iraq. The Central Bank of Haiti performs that function perfectly [see also below].

And it is certainly extraordinary that the commencement of the volcanic ash crisis and the shutdown of British and northern European airports coincided precisely with the NATO air force exercise, hosted by Germany – with flights starting to be resumed effective 20th April, coinciding with the end of the NATO air force exercise on 22nd April. In geopolitics there are no coincidences.

AIRSPACE SHUTDOWN: A DIRECT WARNING TO THE UNITED STATES RE THE SETTLEMENTS
While what we state above and immediately below is accurate, there is a FURTHER DIMENSION, which is directly connected to the Settlements: see the Diary Section below for the events that preceded the shutdown, especially the seizure of the funds sent over by the Bank of England.

The airspace shutdown followed that event, and SEVERELY IMPACTED THE UNITED STATES as well as the immediately affected countries. We are informed that the airspace shutdown, achieved by ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION, represented an operation which sent a signal to the US kleptos that the Rest of the World can immediately respond to the US criminalists’ pariah behaviour (in this case, in re-seizing theSettlement funds) by closing down normal channels of transportaion and thus, by extension, any other form of communication they choose.

This is the FURTHER DIMENSION, and if you examine the timing, and at the fact that the airspace shutdown could be turned on and off by EU fiat, you’ll see that this additional dimension is clearly pertinent. Information received at 6:15 hrs UK time, 22nd April 2010.

SUCCESSFUL ‘TEST’ BY COVERT SOVIETS AND
THEIR COVERT ‘BLACK’ GERMAN INTELLIGENCE PARTNERS
To place the worst possible construction on all this, given that German ‘Black’ intelligence and the KGB/FSB/GRU work together, as they always have, at the highest level, we could have witnessed a manipulative operation perpetrated from within NATO with the full collaboration of covert Soviet military intelligence, to test the extent to which Western economies and military air space can be catastrophically destabilised by malicious regulation – illustrating, not least, the crass stupidity of Europhiliacs like Mandelson in accommodating the alienation of total control over British airspace to unreliable, compromised, corrupt, penetrated Soviet-style institutionalised collectivism.

The accuracy of the Editor’s 2002 analysis, The European Collective, which shows how the Soviet Union was ‘folded’ in order to facilitate the surreptitious reverse takeover of somnolent Western Europe by the covert Soviets, is daily gaining further confirmation. The latest evidence of this emerged on 19th April when it was revealed that NATO plans to ‘invite’ Russia to participate in the development and construction of a joint (i.e. collective) defence shield against ballistic missiles launched from a rogue nuclear state, such as Iran.

IRAN PROVIDES CONTROLLED ‘PRETEXT’ FOR NATO OVERTURES TOWARDS RUSSIA
This initiative exploits the deliberate, controlled ‘rogue’ status of Iran, headed by a Jew, President Ahmadinejad, whose family name is Sabourjian. In Farsi, jian means ‘Jew’; and ‘sabour’ is Farsi for the Jewish prayer-shawl: so Ahmadinejad’s family name means ‘maker of the Jewish prayer-shawl’ – a reality which the intelligence operative masquerading as President of Iran openly acknowledged in 2009, in an extraordinary incident when he held up his passport open at the page displaying his family name ‘Sabourjian’, in front of TV and press photographers [confirmed by Tehran sources].

So the Iranian ‘stand-off’ is unquestionably a controlled operation – for use as an ongoing foil against which ‘Great Leaps Forward’ towards ‘One World’ control can be developed: of which the ‘enticement’ of Russia into a NATO project is just one example.

But in reality, it is the covert Soviet Union that, in conformity with Mikhail Gorbachëv’s repeated proclamation of ‘Europe from the Atlantic to Vladivostok’, is ‘backing into’ the Western structures, just as that master Leninist strategist predicted.

US policymakers, whether stupid as usual or complicit, or both of the above, have been discussing this latest ploy directly with the Soviets. The Deputy US Assistant secretary of Defense, Bradley Roberts, told a Congressional Committee all about this during the week ending 16th April. A NATO spokesman, James Apparthurai, said that US officials had been in direct talks on the subject with Moscow, and that the NATO chief, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, supports the proposal, which he was intended to unveil to NATO at a summit meeting in Siim Kallas’s home town of Talinn this week.

Of course, the fact that the NATO summit meeting takes place in Talinn, and that the European Transport Commissioner who was orchestrating the commercial airport shutdown is a secret KGB officer from Talinn, are further ‘non-coincidences’, you will readily understand.

THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION: TWEEDLEDUM
AND TWEEDLDUMBER: PLUS THE FOREIGN OFFICE ATHEIST
The British General Election campaign to date has been a painful exercise in empty rhetoric fronted by controlled political puppets trying to convince an embittered and sceptical electorate that they have something worthwhile to contribute, which is not the case.

On the one hand, the discredited, always rather dirty-looking (like Paul Wolfowitz) Gordon Brown, whose stewardship of the British financial economy has been beyond disastrous, has been forced to run around the country practicing his false smile (which he has the greatest difficulty at all times in achieving) for the benefit of unimpressed hangers-on at ‘schools’nhospitals’ (all one word). To this Tweedledum is pitted Tweedledumber, this Cameron fellow – who has no message whatsoever beyond the word ‘change’ – a revolutionary slogan which deliberately and obtusely begs the basic question: change TO WHAT?

By not defining any terms at all, these empty cardboard characters imagine that they can pull the wool over the British electorate’s eyes with impunity. But the British electorate is not stupid – as a senior so-called ‘Conservative’ informed The Times (6) on 13th April.

‘It’s a phoney war right now, but that’s not because of any lack of fighting’, this fellow confided.

‘It’s because they think we’re all fakes’.

Notice that the blame for this delusion is implicitly foisted on the electorate, which ‘thinks’ ‘we are all fakes’, so that the problem the ‘Conservatives’ faced was ‘how to convince them that we’re not fakes’. Manifestly that’s impossible, not least given that the ‘Conservative’ Party, which exists to CONSERVE rather than to OVERTHROW everything, has nothing to offer beyond its ‘change’ slogan, with no definition of terms so that no-one knows what Cameron seeks to ‘change’ the country TO. Obviously, the ‘Conservatives’ don’t know, or won’t say’.

Given this vacuum at the epicenter of the ‘Conservative’ Party’s offering to the electorate, it’s hardly surprising that ‘they think we’re all fakes’, because that’s exactly what these people are.

And WHY are they fakes?

The underlying reason is that they are purporting to be concerned with issues affecting ‘ordinary people’, and to have ‘the answers’ to ‘their’ problems – whereas in reality, these cardboard fakes are marionettes dancing to diversionary tunes orchestrated by the internationalist agenda, which embraces the sterile corruption of Britain’s membership of the European Union Collective.

Has this sacred cow even been MENTIONED in the campaign by any of the three main parties?

You guessed correctly: the answer is NO*. It’s a taboo subject: and yet, as we’ve seen even with the jackboot imposition by regulation by a KGB officer masquerading as the European Transport Commissioner, the internationalist agenda is poised to destroy the British economy, to stifle all dissent – and to achieve all this simply by means of COLLECTIVIST REGULATION.

* However the televised ‘Debate’ scheduled for 22nd April is on foreign policy, so the issue has been boxed into a controlled format from which it stands little chance of further ventilation.

Complicating the charades being acted out by Tweedledum and Tweedledumber has been the emergence of the Foreign Office atheist – another straw character, namely, the leader of the Liberal Democrats, ‘Nick’ Clegg, who wants to abolish the religious basis of ancient schools, to impose a ‘mansion tax’ and to scrap the pound in favour of the failing Euro, and whose stock rose sharply after the Tweedles made relative fools of themselves with their empty pronouncements and contradictory inanities during the first TV Election ‘Debate’.

It was of course a catastrophic error of judgment for David Cameron to have agreed to these TV ‘debates’, since they provide an opportunity for the third empty vessel to impress itself upon the confused minds of the disillusioned people.

And given that the jaded electorate remains unimpressed with the Tweedles, any first-year student of politics could have told ‘Conservative’ Central Office that the effect would be liable to catapult the third ‘candidate’ into the public consciousness, given the disillusionment with the others, with disastrous consequences for the fake ‘Conservatives’. Which is precisely what has happened. And the consequences for the ‘Conservative’ Party may be terminal.

Clegg is a self-professed, left-wing atheist, married to a Spaniard, whom he met when he was an official in Brussels, seconded there from the Foreign Office – a hotbed for several generations of treachery against British interests and its survival as a nation state.

Since, as a direct consequence of Cameron’s ill-advised agreement to participate with the Liberal Democrat leader in the televised Election ‘Debates’, the outcome of this controlled UK election is likely to be a combined majority for the Liberal Democrats and the Labour Party, the prospect, at the time of writing, appeared to be that the incoming government will be by far the furthest left of any government Britain has ever been saddled with.

Moreover the ‘Conservative’ Party could be destroyed and marginalised. The Liberal Democrats will demand, as their ‘price’ for collaboration with Labour, electoral reform, namely a flaky system of proportional representation – guaranteed to ensure weak governments in perpetuity, and to keep the ‘Conservatives’ permanently out of power.

In other words, due to the stupidity of ‘Conservative’ Central Office, the United Kingdom is on the verge of lurching sharply and irretrievably to the left – in precise accordance with the Gorbachëv formula, exposed in The European Union Collective, of procuring the permanent liquidation of all parties that are not of the left

THE INCOMING GOVERNMENT’S LEGISLATION MAY BE
NULL AND VOID, LIKE ALL UNITED KINGDOM LAWS SINCE 2000
Of course, as you can see from our report entitled ‘ALL UK LEGISLATION SINCE 2000 IS NULL AND VOID’, which did indeed ‘go viral’, if the incoming Government does not deal immediately, before doing anything else, with rectification of the Letters Patent issue affecting the Hereditary Peers, all legislation passed by the new Westminster Parliament will wind up as invalid as the legislation that earlier Parliaments under Blair and Brown have squandered a decade passing since 2000.

• In this connection, some people seem to think that because challenges concerning the Letters Patent issue have been rejected by the UK High Court, the issue is dead. That indicates a degree of perversity and dim-wittedness that only inspires contempt. Such blanket assertions overlook the fact that Baroness Ashton of Upholland made the damning pronouncement that she made in the House of Lords, which is recorded in Hansard. Her statement left the position crystal clear, as anyone who re-reads our report dated 11th April 2010 on this issue can easily understand.

And if it turns out that President Barrack Obama is an illegitimate impostor (as the Editor is not an American citizen, he cannot pronounce on this subject, which is for Americans to resolve), it will likewise follow that all legislation signed into law by Obama, together with all his Executive Orders, will turn out to have been null and void, as well – enabling the institutionalised official kleptocracy to have everything ‘both ways’ (the dialectic and double-mindedness, again), since the situation can be manipulated in accordance with what Lenin called ‘the correlation of forces’.

THE FIVE-POINTED STAR CLUE TO THE FACT THAT
THE BRITISH ELECTION IS A STAGED THEATRICAL DISPLAY
Meanwhile observers completely omitted to notice or draw attention to a deliberate clue that the British General Election is CONTROLLED and therefore fraudulent. We refer to the fact that the door into the venue used for the first TV Election ‘Debate’ contained an aperture in the shape of a pentastar – that is to say, the five-pointed star to be seen everywhere in the revolutionary United States and everywhere in the covert revolutionary Soviet Union.

Specifically, the all TV cameras honed in on this polished ‘wooden’ door, making sure that ‘the interested’ need not have missed this ‘in-your-face’ presentation of the CLUE to what is going on. Within the pentastar aperture was a second five-pointed star which formed a glass ‘window’ into the TV venue in Manchester.

Now American observers may not be aware that in the United Kingdom, we don’t DO five-pointed stars. This geomasonic, esoteric revolutionary emblem is NOT USED IN BRITAIN AT ALL.

Yet, all of a sudden, a five-pointed star was deliberately built into the specially constructed door, with its window into the ‘New Order’ being unveiled to the gullible members of the general public in attendance, who thought they were there to hear ‘what the leaders have to say’ and to learn about their policies. Instead, they were dumb witnesses to an empty, controlled, and debilitating charade orchestrated in order to sustain the illusion of ‘democracy’ so as to delude the population into believing that the votes to be cast on 6th May are meaningful: whereas the truth is that the main British political parties are all fully signed up to the same sterile internationalist agenda.

OBSERVATIONS IN THE BRITISH ‘MAINSTREAM’ PRESS ON 22ND APRIL 2010
Camilla Cavendish writes in an op-ed. piece in The Times, page 21, subtitled: ‘When voters say they want change, they mean an end to a system which favours cheats: in banks or on benefits’:

‘Politicians and bureaucrats could not see that they had fostered a language of bureaucracy and suspicion that was alienating to people who used public services. They stuck to stubborn mantras that exam results were better, nurses angelic. People stopped believing that politicians could understand their lives or speak their language’.

‘Politicians only sensed the anger once the economic tide began to ebb. The credit crunch showed that bankers who had flaunted their wealth as evidence of their superior merit had indulged in the most childish pass-the-parcel schemes that plunged the world economy into the dark [sic]’.

‘Most bankers emerged unscathed and unrepentant, while people who had acted prudently and saved for their futures found themselves paying for the profligacy of those who had racked up enormous debts. Low interest rates benefited mortgage holders at the expense of British savers who are still watching their money shrink in accounts that banks brazenly change every month’.

‘By the time the expenses scandal broke, bringing the realisation not only of so many MPs having their noses in the trough, but just how big the trough actually was, people had stopped listening’.

• However, because the next Government will be fully signed-up to the internationalist agenda, which overrides preoccupations with domestic issues except wherever they can be moulded to accommodate the internationalist (World Revolution) remit, any expectation of ‘change’ in this crucial respect, would be unwarranted.

There will be NO CHANGE until the brainwashed UK political Establishment ceases to cow-tow to the internationalists and until the rogue elements within the UK intelligence services are cleaned out. The idolatry of Europe has to be discarded; and of this, too, there is little hope right now, as dense UK ‘business leaders’ pontificate in The Financial Times today that they ‘want a government working strongly within the European political mainstream…. It is there, and not on the fringes of Europe… where our voice must be heard’.

These deluded ‘business leaders’ regurgitate the same claptrap that has been standard ever since this Editor became active. Here are some of the delusions encased in the foregoing drivel:

The European Union Collective is a COLLECTIVE. Decisions are taken COLLECTIVELY.

• The COLLECTIVE is indifferent to ‘voices’. No voice can be ‘heard’ in a POLITICAL COLLECTIVE, because ALL DECISIONS ARE TAKEN COLLECTIVELY, so no ‘voice’ has any standing whatsoever.

• The ancient ‘fringes’ of Europe mantra is part of the same infantile delusion. In any POLITICAL COLLECTIVE, it is neither here nor there whether one is ‘at the centre’ of the collective, or on ‘the fringes’ thereof. The geographical location of the ‘voices’, so to speak, is IRRELEVANT: see above.

• These ‘business leaders’ are content that VAT accruals should be remitted into the hands of a criminal enterprise. As we have explained, the European Commission is a criminal enterprise. Its accounts have been explicitly UNAPPROVED by the Court of Auditors for the past 14 years. The UK Serious Fraud Office has CONFIRMED that it is A CRIMINAL OFFENCE for taxpayers’ monies to be paid into the hands of a CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE. Therefore, these British ‘business leaders’ are content for the VAT payments that their businesses have to pay, to be ILLEGALLY paid into the hands of a criminal enterprise, CONTRARY TO THE RULE OF LAW. If that is the case, they are accessories to the fact of their VAT payments being illegally diverted into criminal hands.

• In demanding unqualified support for the European Union Collective, these ‘business leaders’ reveal that, actually, they are de facto fellow-travelling Communists, supporters of Lenin and of the World Revolution, and that they are quite oblivious to the reality of what they are pontificating.

BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY CONFIRMED AS A GERMAN ‘BLACK OPERATION’
One more thing. The British National Party (BNP), which exploits the Union Jack (UK flag) in all its publicity, was exposed several years ago to this Editor as a covert operation run by German ‘Black’ intelligence. One key achievement of this operation has been precisely to STEAL and ERADICATE national sentiment along with the flag, so that anyone expressing views such as that Third World immigration needs to be controlled or stopped, that the integrity of the nation state is paramount and sacrosanct, and that pride in one’s country is meritorious, is in danger of being labelled (by the Great Brainwashed) as a BNP ‘fellow-traveller’.

On 18th April, it was reported that the London organiser of the BNP, Bob Bailey, is the husband of a German Embassy diplomat. He married Ms. Martina Borgfeldt in Australia in 1999 after meeting her while serving in the Royal Marines in Africa. The current Diplomatic List shows that this woman is an ‘assistant attaché’ at the German Embassy in Mayfair, Central London. Mr Bob Bailey lives in accommodation provided by the German Embassy in London.

In a damage limitation exercise, an anonymous spinning source ‘close to the German Embassy’ said that Mr Bailey had never told his wife that he was a BNP leader, and that she only found out about it when confronted by her superiors. Mr Bob Bailey is leader of the opposition grouping on Barking and Dagenham Council, which he hopes to take control of on 6th May.

As such, he holds a public position and therefore his political affiliation is manifestly in the public domain. Accirdingly, the source of this ‘spin’, presumably an operative taking orders from German intelligence, was engaged in a clumsy attempt to cover up the fact that the British National Party is indeed, as we ourselves found out several years ago, a covert confusion-building operation run by Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst, its purpose being to smother genuine British national pride and to reinforce the oppression of ‘nationalism’ – which, if it were to flourish, would threaten pan-German hegemony strategy and the internationalist agenda.

THE BRUTAL COVERT SOVIET CONTAINMENT OF POLAND
Turning to the Polish situation, a central European observer informed us on 19th April 2010 as follows [verbatim account]:

[Watching the TV coverage of the Kaczynzki funeral] ‘First, I sensed that Prime Minister Donald Tusk showed by his behaviour strong signs of guilt, if not a bad conscience, given that he might well be the key figure behind any coup, at least within Poland’.

‘Secondly, the only two international players who were represented were Russia and Germany (showing your analysis in ‘The European Union Collective’ one more time to be perfectly right). [Thanks to the volcanic ash story] all the other presidents and prime ministers now had a perfect excuse not to attend. The volcanic ash dimension also prevented the arrival of an unprecedented stream of Polish patriots living outside the country to Warsaw or Krakov – so that a colossal Polish political demonstration of historic proportions did not take place’.

On the contrary ‘the world saw Poland not just politically decapitated, but basically left out in the cold. No Obama, no Gordon Brown, no Sarkozy, no Berlusconi, no Zapatero, no Papandreou; and not one single representative of European Royalty, either’.

‘Yet Russian President Medvedev did arrive – by jet aircraft – thereby indicating that the Russians, unlike ‘Eurocontrol’, had no problem with the ash cloud’.

‘Accordingly, apart from Germany’s President Horst Köhler and the German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, the gathering consisted ENTIRELY of actual Communist personnel: Yanukovich and Timoshenko, from Ukraine; the Lithuanian President, Mme. Dahlia Grybauskaité, who was formerly the European Budget Commissioner and a KGB and Party operative from the overt Soviet days; President Saakashvili, MVD chief Eduard Shevardnadze’s former Interior (‘Justice’) Minister, from Georgia; President Basescu from Romania; and the former Polish Prime Minister, now President of the European Parliament, Jerzy Buzek, who managed to travel to Poland without any difficulty’.

‘And how was the scene transmitted? Why, by a huge army of international TV teams who had managed to arrive in Poland in good time, notwithstanding the airport shutdowns’.

• CORRECTION:
When originally posted, we stated in error here (based on information from Austria) that President Vaclav Klaus from the Czech Republic was nowhere to be seen. We have now received a message from the Czech Republic stating that, on the contrary, President Vaclav Klaus travelled to Krakov by train and was highly critical of the absence of Western leaders and representatives. We are very happy to make this correction, and apologise to our Czech readers for the error.

• AND LISTEN TO THIS: You will see immediately below a reference to covert Stalinist Austrian State President, Heinz Fischer, who didn’t attend the funeral. Following the update about Vaclav Klaus appended immediately above, Czech sources elaborate: Reacting to Vaclav Klaus’s criticism of the non-attendance of Western leaders, the Austrian President declared:

‘I was unable to attend because our work rules forbid my driver to exceed eight hours of continuous driving. So I had to stay in Vienna’.

The State President of the Bundesrepublik Osterreich can ORDER two drivers to drive him to any destination he likes. In official limos, THERE ARE TWO SEATS IN THE FRONT, one for the driver and another in case there needs to be a driver to back him up. Pettifogging EU REGULATIONS do not YET go so far as to require only one driver to service the needs of the State President. Is this jumped up little neo-Stalinist nuts? We don’t use RIDICULE enough to cut these nonentities down to size. The duplicitous Austrian President has made a complete dumkopf of himself and has also humiliated Austria and its people by his wayward behaviour here.

FRAU ANGELA MERKEL GOES EVERYWHERE IN EUROPE EXCEPT TO POLAND
Our correspondent described, in conclusion, the quite extraordinary behaviour during this same timeframe, of Angela Merkel – the erstwhile activist in the East German Communist Party, which she served as Secretary for Agitation and Propaganda in the Communist Youth Department of Karl Marx University. First of all, Merkel indicated that she was going to attend the funeral. Then, ‘due to the ash cloud’, she was ‘forced to land in southern Europe’.

Then, for some unexplained reason, she made an overnight stop as far away as Lisbon, flying on the next day from the Portuguese capital to Rome – whereupon she was driven by car from Rome to Berlin where, according to German TV, she arrived in the late afternoon of Sunday 18th April, just as the funeral was taking place in Krakov. She could have been driven from Rome to Krakov, which is a slightly shorter journey than Rome-Berlin.

As for the covert Stalinist Austrian State President, Heinz Fischer, his excuse not to attend was that his ‘election’ is due on 25th April. But since he has no competitors for the Presidency who stand the remotest chance of winning, he could perfectly well have travelled to Krakov himself without forfeiting his re-election: a car would have taken about five hours, a helicopter ride, less than two hours. No Government Minister from Austria attended at all.

The ‘spin’ which emerged, even in the British press, following the funeral of the Polish President who perished along with most of his top aides in an old Tupolev that had been refurbished in a southern Russian factory and had only been delivered back to the Poles just a few months earlier, was that this ‘accident’ had ‘brought Russia and Poland together’ in shared grief, and had given an impetus to the prospect for good old Polish-Russian Friendship. a.k.a. ‘People’s Friendship’.

In other words, the ‘accident’ that wiped out the top echelon of the Polish Government was ‘the very best thing that could possibly have happened’. As for the Western dignitaries who all too carefully absented themselves, it would seem that they didn’t intend to disturb, by their uwanted presence, this oh-so-conveniently re-established geopolitical equilibrium.

THE THREE INTELLIGENCE RACKETEERS BEHIND THE CRISIS
As you will recall, we have separately proved that the three top operatives who masterminded the controlled ‘takedown’ of the Soviet Union have been systematically engaged, all along, in the TWIN operation to ‘take down’ the ‘Main Enemy’ – Britain and the United States (and also the corrupted English-speaking Dominions, Canada, Australia and New Zealand).

And as we’ve repeatedly explained, since double-mindedness and the dialectic are Kings in these circles, EVERYTHING IS DUPLICATED. Bank accounts are duplicated. All scamming operations are duplicated. Companies with the same name are duplicated in many different jurisdictions around the world. ‘Contradictory’ dual operations are launched in parallel.

The dialectical method enables these operatives to speak out of both sides of their twisted mouths simultaneously. They can say one thing on Monday and do or say the exact opposite on Tuesday, with total equanimity: because their double-mindedness enables them to rationalise ‘opposites’, or what Lenin and Gorbachëv call ‘contradictions’.

Thus the 9/11 abomination involved the TWIN towers; the aborted abomination that was to have resulted in the destruction of the Republican Convention on 1st September 2008 was to have been perpetrated in the TWIN cities of Minneapolis-St Paul.

Diabolical human experimentation on TWINS is a preoccupation of those deviants serving the Darkness who engage in such grossly demonic activities.

Therefore, it comes as no surprise that the orchestrated ‘takedown’ of the Soviet Union had a TWIN – the intended orchestrated ‘takedown’ of the ‘Main Enemy’: which is what we and others have been witnessing and recording.

As previously reported, the ‘former’ Soviet President Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachëv, the former President George H. W. Bush Sr., and former German Chancellor Dr Helmut Kohl are partners with the CEO of Deutsche Bank AG, Dr Josef Ackermann, in Deutsche AG, previously named Barrington Investment Group – which is used as a money laundry and chief hidey-hole for stolen and diverted funds, including funds leveraged and derived from a contract stolen from Michael C. Cottrell’s firm Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., in 2002.

This means that Gorbachëv, Bush Sr., Kohl and Ackermann are financial terrorists handling stolen and diverted funds: in other words, they ‘handle stolen goods’. This is a criminal offence in every context with the single exception of the rarefied atmosphere of the intergovernmental firmament, where the Rule of Law does not apply, and the law of the jungle prevails instead.

THE SORDID BACKGROUND OF DR HELMUT KOHL
Equipped with such information, the Editor decided that he didn’t know enough about Kohl, apart from his prowess in amassing gold certificates and nullifying parallel certificates held by others (as previously reported). So we did some additional research.

We discovered the following descriptions of the kind of man Dr Kohl is, published in Spectator Magazine [28th July 2001] and Le Parisien [9th July 2001]. Guess what: all this information was swamped by the 9/11 atrocities, as the dates of these reports make self-evident. Without further elaboration, therefore, they are as follows:

• Spectator Magazine (28th July, 2001):
Helmut Kohl has buried many bodies in his time, and now he has buried his wife Hannelore. Earlier this month, while Dr Helmut Kohl was in Berlin, she committed suicide by taking an overdose of painkillers and sleeping tablets at their home in Ludwigshafen, on the Rhine. The way he disposed of her body was very characteristic, combining elements of mendacity, effrontery and the ability to dominate those around him. He assembled the entire German establishment for a requiem mass in a Roman Catholic cathedral for a Protestant who had committed suicide. The German media had already, almost without exception, swallowed Frau Kohl’s explanation for her death, which was that she was suffering from such an agonising allergy to light, that for the last 15 months she had only been able to leave the house under cover of darkness. Doctors have been unable, from the scant details given, to identify her illness, and she was buried without post mortem.

Some people have reported that she seemed well able to withstand daylight within the last few months. A friend of mine recently saw her going for a walk in the Grünewald forest on the edge of Berlin, and Mr. Kohl himself alluded, on the day before she died, to their forthcoming summer holiday in Austria. Only Stern magazine ventured to point out that the official account did not hang together. It remarked that a few weeks ago, when the Kohls’ son Peter married a Turkish woman, Elif Sözen, in Istanbul, Helmut Kohl attended the wedding not with Mrs. Kohl, but with his personal assistant, Juliane Weber, who started working for him in Mainz in 1964 and has long been his right-hand aide. What Mrs. Kohl thought of this we may never know. ENDS

• Laurent Valdiquié, Le Parisien (9th July 2001):
Following the suicide of his wife, Helmut Kohl is now indirectly linked to a suspicious death in France. Diethelm Höner, a German millionaire friend of Helmut and Hannelore Kohl, was found dead in his villa in Cannes on 17th January. He had been the Kohls’ informal financial adviser, running the affairs of Hannelore Kohl’s charitable foundations.

The 60 year-old financier had apparently ‘fallen downstairs’ but French prosecutors are finally investigating the death. Höner was connected with the Elf scandal, in which bribes were allegedly paid by the French oil company to Helmut Kohl’s Christian Democratic Party. Höner, whose fortune ran to some £1 million [sic], had told friends that he felt threatened for several years.

He lived in Cannes in a state of permanent fear and was obsessed by security. According to a document leaked to a French paper, he knew about the diversion of large sums of money via the German intelligence services; he alleged in this document that most of the aid given by Germany to Russia had been stolen and that the Russians were using the stolen money to finance industrial espionage in computer and bio-technology. Höner also knew Dieter Holzer, a German businessman living in Monte Carlo, who is now on the run following the revelation that he took money from the bribes paid by Elf for the purchase of the Leuna oil refinery.

The French authorities are treating the death as suspicious because, according to a preliminary medical report, the position of the body was not compatible with a fall.

And the security cameras which otherwise filmed everything in his villa, were mysteriously not functioning on the night of his death. ENDS.

The fact that our investigations have revealed Helmut Josef Michael Kohl, who was born on 3rd April 1930 in Ludwigshafen am Rhein, to be a handler of stolen goods, a financial terrorist and a criminal racketeer of the first rank, sharing the proceeds of stolen and diverted funds with his racketeering partners in Deutsche AG (Barrington Investment Group), of St Gallen, Switzerland, George Bush Sr., Mikhail Gorbachëv, and Dr Josef Ackermann, CEO of Deutsche Bank, is not surprising given ‘further and better particulars’ about this operative’s financial activities.

For Kohl has been no stranger to financial scandal. In 1999, it was revealed that his CDU political grouping had received and maintained illegal funding under his leadership. Investigations by the Bundestag into the sources of illegal CDU-tagged funds, mainly stashed in Geneva bank accounts, revealed two sources. One was the sale of German tanks to Saudi Arabia (involving kickbacks), and the other was a privatisation fund operated in collusion with the late French President François Mitterrand, who sought 2,550 unused allotments in the former East Germany for Elf Aquitaine. In December 1994, the CDU Bundestag majority passed a law nullifying all rights of the then current owners of the (petrol station) allotments. In this context, over DM 300 million in illegal funds were discovered in secret Swiss bank accounts in Geneva canton.

The fraudulently acquired allotments were then privatised for Elf Aquitaine, and wound up owned by TotalFinaElf, now Total SA. Kohl maintained that Elf Aquitaine had offered and had subsequently completed a massive investment in East Germany’s chemical industry, while also taking over 2,000 petrol stations in Germany formerly owned by the East German national oil company Minol. Elf Aquitaine was found to have financed the CDU illegally under Mitterrand’s orders, in line with standard practice in the corrupt Francophone countries.

These matters appear not to have been resolved. A German-Canadian businessman, Karlheinz Schreiber, a long-term associate of Kohl’s late CSU political rival Franz Josef Strauß, is still wanted by Bavarian prosecutors on charges of fraud and corruption. Schreiber is reported to have been fighting extradition from Canada to Germany ever since the summer of 1999 (at least, this was the position in 2008). Free on bail in Canada, Herr Schreiber filed an Affidavit implicating the former Canadian Prime Minister, Brian Mulroney. On 13th November 2007, the current Canadian Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, called for a public enquiry into Schreiber’s statements.

CANADIAN PRIME MINSTER HARPER REPORTED TO BE ‘SPACED OUT’
Although what follows may not be connected, something odd is afoot in Canada, too. Last year there was firm talk of an early General Election there, but these indications have faded amid a strange conspiracy of silence involving the highest levels of the political parties, including the Liberals – now led now by Michael Ignatieff, from a Canadian family of Russian Jewish extraction, who spent a good portion of his life in Britain, becoming well known as a late-night ‘intellectual’ talking head on BBC shows and a prolific contributor of left-wing articles to The Guardian.

Then he suddenly left Britain for a post at Harvard, after which he moved back north to Canada and entered politics – rising to the highest slot in the Liberal Party.

Meanwhile, Stephen Harper appears from his television appearances to be somewhat ‘spaced out’. A Canadian correspondent writes: ‘If you watch his eyes on TV, he appears to be not all there’. As the corruption unravels, these operatives are being exposed, or worse [see 21st April].

NEIL BUSH IN CHARGE OF BUSH SR.’S ASSETS?
Earlier information suggested that Mrs Barbara Bush may have taken over the management of George Bush Sr.’s colossal illicit financial interests. Since no reports about the Bush Crime Family can be taken at face value, given the Bush Sr. apparatus’s record of floating disinformation stories via controlled ‘grapevines’ (several of which were targeted at this service at earlier stages of this criminal investigation), that assertion ought to have been accompanied by a health warning.

Nevertheless, reports that Mrs Barbara Bush spent some days in hospital in March and references to Grave’s disease, were accurate, and it has been reported that Mrs Bush remains in poor health. Her condition would be consistent with the consequences of long-term exposure to electronic activity and is paralleled by the condition of Hillary Clinton, whose physical deterioration is visible to all, and whose appearance recently has been unofficially diagnosed as being consistent with Grave’s disease. Specifically, she has put on much weight, walks awkwardly and her speech is slow, with (we are told) some slurring of her words.

After eight years in the White House, such an outcome would, experts advise, be likely.

At all events, these reports have coincided with separate information to the effect that Neil Bush, who was implicated in the Savings and Loan scandals of the 1980s, has ‘descended from’ Toronto, where he had long been operating following a prolonged spell in Hong Kong whence he had been removed at the instigation of his father George Bush Sr., to get him out of the way in the aftermath of the S&L débacle, to Houston. That cannot be be ‘good news’, given this man’s background.

NEIL BUSH AND THE SAVINGS AND LOAN PILLAGING OPERATION
Specifically, his stewardship as Director of Silverado Savings and Loan, Denver, was covered in ignominy. Neil Bush became a Director on Silverado’s Board in 1985, but resigned just days after George Bush Sr. was nominated as the Republican candidate for the Presidency in 1988 and three months before Silverado was compelled by regulators to establish nearly $200 million in loan loss reserves to cushion the thrift from expected losses on shaky (i.e., shady) deals. At the time, Neil Bush said that he had resigned for personal reasons. But the real reason for his resignation was to ‘spare his father the embarrassment’ of Silverado Savings and Loan’s deteriorating condition and probable collapse (which duly occurred late in 1988).

After all, as Vice President, Bush Sr. had chaired the Bush Task Group on Regulation of Financial Services, an element of Reagan’s deregulation initiative. This operation ostenstibly disappeared into oblivion in August 1983 after the media thought it had achieved very little.

But in reality, George Bush Sr. and his corrupt associates had exploited the Task Force’s access to inside information to decipher how the financial system worked, so that it could be ransacked all the more efficiently. Typically picking up quite the wrong end of the stick, a ‘regulatory expert’ at Carnegie-Mellon University, Lester Lave, told a Fortune magazine reporter that ‘they took a lesson from the Vietnam War: Declare victory and pull out’.

No, they ‘pulled out’ because their ‘investigation’ had achieved its real purpose: to equip the Bush Crime Family with the inside knowledge it needed to orchestrate wholesale frontal attacks on the financial sector and all who invested in it.

Later, the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB) actually announced that it had requested the Justice Department to investigate charges that Stuart Root, the former President of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC), had given the Denver-based Silverado Savings an advance warning that regulators were intending to seize that thrift in December 1988. Silverado Savings had been borrowing heavily from the Topeka Federal Home Loan Bank, but no supervisory measures were taken against Silverado until it was finally declared insolvent in December 1988, following Bush Sr.’s election to the Presidency.

The National Thrift News reported separately that Neil Bush’s oil and gas company had a line of credit at a bank owned by a developer who owned large amounts of Silverado’s preferred stock and received more than $40 million in loans from Silverado Savings and Loan. Neil Bush also sat on the Board of a Florida corporation that borrowed over $80 million from Western Savings of Dallas, which also collapsed. In other words, Neil Bush presided over operations to divert funds from the banks on the Boards of which he sat – a state of affairs which not even his brazen father could tolerate blowing up in his face just as he was embarking upon his corrupt Presidency.

NOTHING’S CHANGED, OF COURSE: LOOK AT NANCY PELOSI
The whole point about the United States is that since it is a ‘Black’ foundation – which is to say, it is rooted in geomasonic esoteric magick make-believe and gobbldegook, as the notorious layout of Washington, DC, with its phallic monument and pentastar pathways, constantly remind us.

(The same can be stated about the Vatican, which has its own phallic monument in the centre of a circle: and look what’s happening to the Vatican).

Hence nothing can ever go right in this country. Its foundation is malevolent, so everything always goes wrong. (Other countries, including Britain, of course, suffer similar problems due to their own comparable blind stupidity). Ever since the Editor of this service started visiting the United States frequently in 1977, there has been at least one major scandal ‘rocking’ Washington.

After 33 years of observing these routine eruptions of pure evil, the corrupt sewage floating downstream from Washington these days has lost its stench for veteran observers such as your correspondent. Since the root cause of these incessant manifestations of corruption isn’t either understood or tackled, they continue. Of the manifestations of the evil for which Washington is notorious, the most egregious is the continued existence of a corrupted Intelligence Power which has usurped the Executive and Legislative Branches and operates as an arrogant, murderous self-financing ‘state within the state’ without any meaningful checks and balances.

But from the perspective of the corrupted ‘elevated personages’ living and having their being within the Beltway, the status quo cannot be faulted. Take, for instance, the case of the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi. A list of her investment holdings with her husband as joint tenants in common with regard to the god they worship, Mammon, is given at Note (7).

This list provides an insight into the values of such operatives, who are supposed, when surfaced as legislators, to be impartial servants of the people.

NOW THEY’VE STARTED SCREAMING AT EACH OTHER IN PUBLIC
Because it’s always ABOUT THE MONEY. At this level, there’s never any other issue. Nor can the seething anger and resentment of the holders of supreme power be hidden from public view any longer, it seems. This became clear when ‘mainstream’ media reports published on 14th April 2010 showed an unprecedented photograph of two highest-level leaders screaming at each other.

The occasion was the Nuclear Security Summit Meeting held in Washington on 13th April. On page 16 of The Daily Telegraph, the Russian (KGB) President, Dmitry Medvedev (Menakhem Aaronovich Mendel’) was seen angrily pointing his finger at French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who was angrily pointing at Medvedev, with a look of extreme hatred on his unprepossessing countenance.

The accompanying article stated blandly that ‘Nicolas Sarkozy, the French President, and Dmitry Medvedev, his Russian counterpart, appeared to have a heated exchange during the summit meetings yesterday. Mr Sarkozy has said France will not give up its nuclear weapons because doing so would ‘jeopardise’ its security. Mr Medvedev last week signed an agreement with US President Barack Obama agreeing to reduce his nuclear warheads by a third’.

It was a kindly lady at S. Japhet and Co. in the City of London, where the Editor, in 1959, was rather temporarily employed during the Eichmann controversy, who uttered an unforgettable response to your correspondent’s naïve question: ‘What’s all the fuss about? Eichmann’s Jewish’.

‘You don’t understand’, she explained patiently to the only goy on the premises: ‘A Jew’s greatest enemy is another Jew’.

The Jew in charge of France is shown screaming at the Jew in charge of Russia at a so-called Nuclear Security Summit Meeting in front of the world’s TV cameras: and The Daily Telegraph sticks this story and picture on page 16.

If your correspondent had been Editor of the newspaper, he would have ordered the front page to be cleared and the report rewritten to focus specifically on this evil exchange of mutual loathing.

• But of course, we’ve forgotten something: an intelligence cell is resident in every US and UK press room, as previously confirmed. It would have argued for the bland treatment that the British newspaper duly applied to this sensational story

Because although the context was the nuclear ‘Summit’, the underlying tension CONCERNS THE MONEY. These operatives have ‘lost it’. As we have stated, at the intergovernmental level, the Rule of Law does not exist. Everyone double-crosses everyone else, everyone lies, everyone engages in wall-to-wall intrigue, and all displays of harmony for the benefit of public consumption are false. Now we see that these ‘Dark Actors Playing Games’ cannot even hide the fact that they hate each other’s guts: and it’s neither here nor there whether a competing snake is Jewish or not.

SACKED SARKOZY ‘SPIN DOCTOR’ CONFIRMS THAT ‘IT’S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY’
That ‘it’s all about the money’ was, moreover, a fact of life that will indeed have been at the very forefront of Mr Sarkozy’s mind even as he was engaged in this open display of fury at Medvedev for the benefit of the TV cameras. Here’s why.

It had been reported on 13th April that Mr Sarkozy had banned his chief ‘spin doctor’, M. Pierre Charon, from key meetings after his disastrous handling of the uncontrolled rumours about the state of the French President’s marriage. Like Silvio Berlusconi and Gordon Brown, the woman placed at Mr Nicolas Sarkozy’s side is believed to be an intelligence operative (another prominent example being Rupert Murdoch, whose Chinese ‘replacement’ wife is known to be a Communist Chinese intelligence agent). That way, pillow talk gets delivered instantaneously to the intelligence eavesdroppers controlling the President, Prime Minister, or senior executive in question.

Carla Bruni-Sarkozy is the French President’s third wife, and she’s said to be ‘in a relationship’ with Benjamin Biolay, ‘a musician’. For his part, President Sarkozy was reported to be having an affair with the ‘Ecology Minister’, Chantal Jouannou. All concerned have denied these suggestions, but M. Charon had different ideas. A few days earlier, he responded by claiming that President Nicolas Sarkozy’s decision to exclude him from key high-level meetings might have reflected a foreign plot from ‘financial movements’ intended to discredit the French President (8).

Once again, the British newspaper missed this clue, proving that it has all along had NO CLUE about THE MONEY. There is NO WAY that M. Charon, privy to French Presidential secrets, would have made such a comment without knowing what he was talking about – not least because no-one unaware of the crisis over the money would have had any reason to make such a public comment.

Besides, President Sarkozy had made it clear on his arrival earlier in the United States that he would stay there until the Settlements payouts had been completed. He was also on record as having called Obama ‘INSANE’ – another outburst DIRECTLY CONNECTED WITH THE MONEY

SO WHAT WAS SARKOZY’S ‘FORMER’ SPIN DOCTOR SAYING, EXACTLY?
For the answer to this question, we need to assemble the available information on what has been going on behind the scenes as the criminal operatives in the United States continue to defy the international community – and also powerful elements within the US structures themselves.

DIARY OF RECENT UNSPEAKABLE BEHIND-THE-SCENES EVENTS
To make some sense of what has been happening, we revert to our Diary Format:

• 30 March: On the Editor’s return from New York, he is informed that ‘President Obama’ has been demanding 60% of ‘the funds’, rather than 40%. According to our sources, Mr Obama was saying essentially: ‘Pay me 60%; or you’ll get nothing’, and that Swiss authorities had refused to comply.

The only figure that we can relate to here is that tax of 35% is the figure that has always been mentioned as being the tax level payable on projected Dollar Refunding proceeds. When we enquired whether these numbers referred to tax payable or some kind of payoff, the answer we managed to extract was: “Don’t know’. Separately, we are told that Bush Sr., Carlyle (and Soros) expected to receive an aggregate $1.3 trillion – apparently in US Treasury instruments.

There is no way that such data can be verified. However what is made clear to us is that the rats were continuing to fight over splitting the money (the tax component which ‘can’t be booked’).

• 02 April: ‘President’ Barack Obama attended at Bank of America’s base in Charlotte, NC, where he signed the necessary pay orders and reportedly told the Bank(s) that they must pay and put up with the consequences. He reportedly told the CIA’s primary bank that the money they had held for the Settlements payouts and which they had instead seized and used for illicit below-the-radar trading operations, must be disgorged forthwith so that the Settlements could be effected.

(Don’t get confused: recall these people say one thing on Monday, and the opposite on Tuesday).

• 03 April: It was reported to us that Mr Paul Volcker and Timothy Geithner had held a meeting in the course of which Mr Volcker had impressed upon Mr Geithner that his best course would be to ‘allow’ the Settlements payouts and the $6.2 trillion Line Item plus the Queen’s stolen gold issue to be resolved, on the basis that the consequences would be beneficial.

Mr Geithner says for the record that meetings over the next three months would be ‘critical’ steps towards bringing about policy changes procuring a more balanced global economy. As you can see, this statement meant nothing as it stood: but reading behind the empty rhetoric, what was being said was that ‘we are in an extreme situation and we are still hoping something will turn up within three months that will ease us out of the predicament (of our own making) we find ourselves in’.

• 03 April: Citibank issues instructions restricting all withdrawals during the coming (post-Easter) week. Note: Citibank appears to be the only one of the large money center banks facing this crisis that is using its institutional brain. It is downsizing as fast as it can, with minimal explanation.

• 07 April: Former President Clinton (who, like his CIA wife, looks ill these days) was rebuffed when he surfaced during the review period in Saudi Arabia, asking for money. He met King Abdullah, the Saudi intelligence chief Prince Muqrin bin Abdulaziz, the Assistant Minister of Defence, Khaled bin Sultan, and other top Saudi officials at the King’s ranch outside Riyadh, where, according to the Saudi Press Agency (SPA), they discussed ‘issues of mutual concern’.

• 08 April: Geithner stops off in Hong Kong to meet officials including the Hong Kong Chief Executive Donald Tsang and the Financial Secretary who has the same name, John Tsang. No information was released for public consumption on what was discussed.

• 08 April: Timothy Geithner, the US Treasury Secretary (accompanied according to unconfirmed reports by his predecessor, Henry M. Paulson), were likewise rebuffed when they surfaced for a 75-minute meeting in the VIP area at Beijing Airport with the Chinese Vice Premier Wang Quishan on a similar pecuniary quest – the object of the exercise being to try to rustle up enough real money to meet the hideously pressing obligations which are being forced upon the Treasury and the White House by the Lien Holders and the international community. Associated Press failed to explain why Geithner had needed to rush to Beijing, and neither did it explain what he had been doing earlier stopping off in India (trying to collect funds, of course).

The US Treasury said in a statement that Geithner and Wang Qishan ‘exchanged views on US-China economic relations, the global economic situation and on certain issues relating to’ a forthcoming meeting scheduled for May of US and Chinese officials in Beijing.

• 08 April: The former US Treasury Secretary, John Snow, now Chairman of the Cerberus vulture fund advised by Bush Sr. Vice President Dan Quayle, visiting Shanghai accompanied by former US President George W. Bush, gave an interview in which he made some vacuous comments about Chinese currency policy. What were Snow and Bush Jr. doing in Shanghai? Trying to collect funds.

• Or else the opposite: placing restolen funds.

• 09 April: Although Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., earlier submitted the requisite form as specified by the Pennsylvania authorities with his cheque for $70.00 in payment of the necessary filing fee, the reprobate Pennsylvania Department State Corporation Bureau did not enter the necessary correction. This correction entailed the designation of Michael Cottrell in four separate entries as President, CEO, Treasurer and Secretary; and the Corporation Bureau form, provided for the purpose, enabled precisely that data to be submitted in the required format along with the fee.

Instead of performing their duty having banked the $70.00 cheque, the PA Corporation Bureau deliberately and, with malicious intent – as we have caught them out having illegally inserted the Mafioso Salvatore R DeFrancesco as Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. – posted the following provocative ‘in-your-face’ gibberish on the Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. screen:

Name: NONE NONE
Title: Secretary
Address: [Address Not Available].

This is a deliberate provocation, calculated to procure the following:

• First, to obfuscate the situation further.

• Secondly, to antagonise Mr Cottrell and all trying to assist him

• Thirdly, to CONTINUE to mask the possibility that the Mafioso Salvatore R. De Francesco retains secret illegal and corrupt signatory power as fraudulent Secretary over Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., sufficient to permit the theft of the payments due to Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., in direct collaboration with the Governor of Pennsylvania and the White House.

• This scandalous state of affairs remained UNCHANGED as of 21st April 2010.

• 09 April 2010: The Bank of England holds an emergency meeting at 10.00 p.m. British time, concerning the disposition of the Settlement payments. At this crucial meeting, all outstanding issues, based on ‘assurances’ from the complicit US authorities, were supposedly ‘resolved’ – including, we were led to believe, pertinent issues surrounding the return of The Queen’s gold.

Since we were informed that ALL outstanding issues were resolved (whatever that meant in detail), it is deduced from this information that the matter of at least The Queen’s Lien on the US Treasury and the return of her $6.2 trillion LOAN pro bono publico for the private sector Dollar Refunding operation were ‘resolved’ along with the return of the gold (9).

• 09 or 10 April: The relevant funds, collected from outside the United States, and sent over via the Bank of England were delivered to US banking sector recipients, and deposited.

• 09 April: The Wall Street Journal reports:

‘In one of those rare moments of unity, the National Bank of Poland and the Polish Government agreed on the need to weaken to polish zloty, which over recent weeks has rebounded close to its pre-crisis strength… After several verbal interventions over the past few days, the central bank intervened with real money Friday, for the first time in over a decade’.

• 10 April: having placed the interests of Poland over that of the European Union Collective by stating publicly that it was ‘technologically and psychologically’ prepared to enter the currency market to prevent ‘excessive strengthening of the zloty’, the President of Poland, Franciszek Gagor, the Deputy Foreign Minister Andrzej Kremer, and the President of the National Bank of Poland, Slawomir Skrzypek, together with the other top officials including the Intelligence Chief and the Army, Navy and Air force Chiefs [see our report dated 11th April 2010] are slaughtered in the ‘accident’ near Smolensk Airport. There are unconfirmed reports of shootings having taken place while the aircraft was still in the air, and after the crash (in particular, the cold-blooded shooting of a video photographer who captured the catastrophe digitally). [See 21 April, below].

• 10-11 April: The delivered funds sent over via the Bank of England were seized by the US banks with the full participation of the White House, the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency and the National Security Council. The funds were placed into ‘lockdown’.

• 12 April: Contrary to previous assurances, Mr Obama let it be known to London that ‘we have things to do and we’re not going to release the funds’. In response, London told the White House that this was unacceptable, and that the hijacked releases and the return of the $6.2 trillion and The Queen’s gold had to be done immediately.

• 12-13 April: Bank of America (Wachovia and Wells Fargo) point blank refuse to release the funds.

As has been hinted by bankers in the past, they now said outright that if they released the funds, they would collapse. In other words, Bank of America, the CIA’s primary institution, employed for its ‘Black Operations’ financial transactions (especially via its Vienna, Austria, and Swiss branches), reneged on the understandings on the basis of which the Bank of England transferred the payout funds [see above]. [FINRA is STILL allowing Wachovia to run trading programs out of St Louis, MO].

• 13 April: The heated exchanges of hatred between Medvedev and Sarkozy in front of the world’s TV cameras [see above] take place against the background of an essentially fraudulent ‘collective nuclear accord’ ostensibly reached at the Washington Nuclear Security Summit requiring extremely expensive outlays by participating governments despite the plain fact that the colossal necessary funding for decommissioning of nuclear operations was not forthcoming.

Indeed experts say that the agreement reached was so bizarre as to suggest that participants had been promised ‘financial incentives’ to reach the ‘required’ collective accord.

Our informants on this score suggested, again, that funds may have been diverted from the Settlements pot, for this purpose. We did say that the ferocious outburst of unfettered anger between Messrs Medvedev and Sarkozy was ALL ABOUT THE MONEY. Specifically, the Nuclear Accord, signed by 49 countries, appears to have been reached with the use of money diverted from the Settlement funds. Indeed, Biden and Obama were said to be engaged in ‘deal making’ behind the scenes, using stolen funds (nuclear and financial terrorism).

In other words, these operatives’ behaviour is identical to the behaviour of the Bush Crime Family, Cheney and the Clintons (all operatives).

• In any case, there was something else that was ‘not right’ about the Nuclear Summit. Specifically, Nursultan Nazarbayev, the former Communist Party Boss in the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic, now a bosom pal of George W. Bush, is sitting on 14% of the world’s uranium reserves, which he is selling all over the place like hot cakes. With the proceeds of these sales and also with his energy income, Nazarbayev is engaged in the construction of a monstrous geomasonic, esoteric capital city in the north of Kazakhstan, now called Astana, which is an anagram of the Russian for Satan, satana. This city, extensively designed by the agnostic British architect, Sir Norman Foster, has a huge pyramid which implements the fabrications and tripe published by the notorious dead mason Manly P. Hall and the dead 19th century masonic necromaniac, Albert Pike. A detailed article on this nauseating extravaganza is to be published in the forthcoming issue of Soviet Analyst [Volume 31, Numbers 6 & 7]. For further background, see the Editor’s book The New Underworld Order.

• 13 April: Michele Obama, accompanied by Mrs Hillary Clinton, surfaces in Haiti – where the White House now controls the Central Bank, in lieu of its waning control over the Central Bank of Iraq [see above]. Michelle Obama then disappeared and surfaced in Mexico.

The only possible explanation for these sudden visitations is that she was engaged in placing diverted/stolen funds. Given 24/7 surveillance of corrupt financial transactions, these operations have to be done by these criminal operatives in person: which explains why so many of them have been running so frenetically around the world, as described herein.

• 14 April: The former Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Fleming Herman Van Rompuy, elevated above his pay-grade as the first President of Europe (in a backroom deal between France and Germany to keep the former British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, out), states that 2009 quote ‘was the first year of World Government’ unquote. This little globalist ideologue evidently believes that World Government is a ‘good thing’, forgetting that it will become a hideous dictatorship. If you have a dispute with the World Government, who do you appeal to, the Man in the Moon?

• But the real significance of this statement is as follows. In order for ‘progress’ towards ‘World Government’ (Lenin’s project) to ‘materialise’, it is necessary to have blackmailable criminalist operatives positioned in the highest slots in all the main countries of the world. 2009 was also the first year of Obama’s White House tenure, which may well prove to be spurious: in which case, all legislation that Obama signs into law will be NULL AND VOID [compare this situation with the fact that all British legislation passed since 2000 is likewise VOID: report dated 11th April [Archive]].

• So what Mr Van Rompuy was actually saying was that he welcomed the fact that the controllers of the World Revolution have successfully procured that all the top slots in the key Governments are held by criminalist operatives, or are held by blackmailable figures answerable to such forces.

• 14 April: Vice President Biden told ‘inside’ contacts and others specifically that those concerned had to be ‘in place at the banks’ because the payments would now be completed. These and other repeated high-level assurances all turned out to be lies.

• 09-14 April: Amid all this turmoil, we gathered additionally from reliable sources that:

• GRU Prime Minister Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin (Shalomov)
was refusing to speak to ‘President’ Barack Obama.

• President Sarkozy’s fury wasn’t just confined to the episode
at the Washington Nuclear Summit Meeting that was caught on-camera.

• When approached to disgorge some of the funny money stashed in Warsaw following the George W. Bush-era Fraudulent Finance trading fest, the Polish Government, subsequently decimated in the Tupolev air ‘accident’, had responded to the White House and the International Monetary Fund with a form of words consistent with a hand gesture using the first and second fingers.

• 14 April: All of a sudden, the International Monetary Fund announces that it had expanded its New Arrangements to Borrow (NAB) facility from the existing level of $50 billion, by $500 billion, to $550 billion. Now, you are entitled to take the Fund’s public statement covering this development at its face value, if you want to. Alternatively, you could justifiably speculate here that, given the known DUPLICATION PRINCIPLE, $500 billion of the remittances sent over by the Bank of England for the Settlements payouts was ‘suddenly’ ‘made available’ to the Fund. You would be fully entitled to be suspicious, in the light of the timing of this development.

• Meanwhile the Fund’s statement on the expansion of its New Arrangements to Borrow, released on 14th April, issued to the IMF Press Room, reads as follows:

‘The NAB is a standing set of credit arrangements under which participants commit resources to IMF lending when these are needed to supplement quota resources. The newly expanded NAB will become operational when it receives formal acceptances from the required proportion of current and potential participants, which will require legislative backing in some cases’.

‘The expansion of the NAB will make an important contribution to global financial stability, but it is not a substitute for a general increase in the Fund’s resources. The Fund is, and shall remain, a quota-based institution. It is important now that member countries rapidly take the necessary steps to make the increased resources available’.

‘The NAB is a credit arrangement between the IMF and a group of members and institutions to provide supplementary resources to the IMF when these are needed to forestall or cope with an impairment of the monetary system. The NAB is supplementary to quota resources, which are made up of the quota subscriptions that each country pays upon joining the Fund, broadly based on its relative size in the world economy. IMF quotas currently total 217.4 billion Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) (about $330 billion). Like quota allocations, the NAB is reviewed on a regular basis’.

‘The recent unprecedented shock confronting the global economy [Unspoken: due to unfettered Fraudulent Finance – Editor] has led to a sharp increase in the demand for IMF financing’.

‘To ensure that the IMF continues to have sufficient resources to meet demand, leaders of the Group of Twenty (G-20) agreed in April 2009 that immediate financing from members of $250 billion would subsequently be folded into an expanded and more flexible NAB, increased by up to $500 billion. The G-20 leaders then reaffirmed their commitment on 5th September 2009 to a tripling of the resources available to the IMF, from a pre-crisis level of about $250 million…. Pending the entering into force of the expanded NAB, the member countries have pledged more than $300 billion in immediate bilateral financing should the Fund require additional resources for lending’.

However, bearing in mind the DUPLICATION PRINCIPLE on which the shadow Fraudulent Finance system operates, the otherwise unassailable accuracy of this statement can be seen to provide cover for the sudden ‘availability’ of $500 billion, while a further $300 billion of resources is also additionally ‘available’ – close to the $1.0 trillion which we were told recently was the Settlements shortfall. Since de facto the International Monetary Fund takes orders from the White House (the CIA/NSA cadres in the basement), the foregoing formal statement can be treated as cover.

• 15 April: The Securities and Exchange Commission files its Complaint against Goldman Sachs & Co. and its employee Mr Fabrice Tourre [see our report and the complete text, posted on 18th April 2010: Archive]. We are later informed that the filing of this Complaint was a DIRECT consequence of the Complaint filed by Hodges and Associates, of Pasadena, CA, on behalf of certain CMKM victims against the Securities and Exchange Commission, and against top current and former SEC officials [see our report dated 9th January, Archive].

The SEC and personnel accepted service of the Complaint and because the SEC is an official US entity, were given 60 days to respond. Thanks to the sterling work on this matter performed by Tim Barello at Examiner.com, National Edition, very belatedly, a number of outlets have at last realised the significance of this case which we characterised from the outset on 9th January as the biggest legal case in world history. The CMKX victims seek $3.87 trillion in compensation, given that some 2.25 trillion of phantom CMKX shares were floated via a platform associated with the SEC itself during the corrupt Bush II Presidency.

(As you can see from a separate entry here, George W. Bush Jr. appears to be free to roam the world with his former Treasury Secretary, John Snow, having scandalously obtained the demanded immunity from prosecution provided by the World Court in the most disgraceful mass abuse of its powers since that entity was established).

• 16 April onwards: The SEC’s complaint against Goldman Sachs & Co. serves the purpose of obfuscating the CMKX/CMKM case against the Securities and Exchange Commission itself. It also serves the interests of President Obama and the Democrats, with Obama asserting that he will veto any Bill (e.g. from Senator Dodd) which does not discipline the derivatives sector. Obama appears not yet to have caught up with the fact that all securitisation is illegal under US law, so that 100% of these transactions, like legislation passed by the British Parliament since 2000, are null and void. No doubt he is being advised that this issue is academic, as all laws that Obama himself signs into law may turn out to be null and void as well, either contemporaneously or in the future, should it transpire that the man occupies the White House illegitimately.

The consequence of any such ‘finding’, by the way, would amount to treason and might trigger the ultimate penalty (even though he is a tool of the Intelligence Power and a CIA operative himself. As we know, once the Intelligence Power has ‘finished with’ an operative, it is common practice to treat him or her like dirt and to allow them to dangle and rot sine die in the wind, or jail).

• 17 April: The Wall Street Journal reports that the Dutch bank, Rabobank, has filed a further (second) lawsuit against Merrill Lynch, alleging that this entity engaged in activity comparable to Goldman Sachs’ behaviour as explained in the SEC Civil Complaint against Goldman Sachs with Paulson – i.e., devising a Collateralised Debt Obligation (CDO) on behalf of Magnetar, a hedge fund which used it to take a short position, without disclosing this material fact to the investors.

Specifically, Richard Smith wrote: ‘Merrill Lynch & Co. engaged in the “same type of fraudulent conduct” that Goldman Sachs was accused of committing by the US Securities and Exchange Commission in a lawsuit on Friday…. Lawyers for Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbak BA, or Rabobank, stated that Merrill Lynch committed a similar fraud in the structuring of a $1.5 billion Collateralized Debt Obligation…’.

‘Rabobank sued Merrill Lynch in New York State Court last year, alleging it was owed about $45 million in a senior secured loan when the CDO defaulted and was liquidated in 2008. The Dutch bank claimed [that] Merrill Lynch misrepresented that the CDO was a carefully structured investment vehicle when Rabobank made a $57.7 million upfront loan in March 2007’.

‘Rabobank claims that the … CDO was a “dumping ground” for impaired subprime assets and was structured with the help of a prized Merrill Lynch hedge fund client as a bet against the mortgage backed securities market’.

• 21 April: The Editor is informed that ongoing ‘real-time’ progress towards the completion of the Settlements payouts is quote proving ‘sensitive and bloody’ unquote. The Editor queried ‘bloody’ and received confirmation that this description was both accurate and intended. The related G-20 meeting takes place at the Spring Meetings in Washington this week.

THEY ARE AVOIDING THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM
You will of course have noticed that the SEC Complaint against Goldman Sachs and the Rabobank lawsuit, both address the evidence of Fraud in the Inducement specific to the Fraudulent Finance operations in question. What these cases don’t do is to cut through all the specifically fraudulent breaches of the US 1933 and 1934 Securities Acts etc [see Legal Notes below] and the SEC’s Rules and Regulations, by making it clear that ALL SECURITISATION UNDER U.S. LAW IS ILLEGAL, as you can see from our report dated 18th April 2010 [Archive].

• The elephant stands in every Courthouse dealing with Fraudulent Finance in the United States.

• If all securitisation is illegal, then the frauds committed within this context are of course frauds within overall frauds: a fact of immense significance and sensitivity.

This bizarre state of affairs arises from the fact that all these institutions and entities, INCLUDING THE S.E.C. ITSELF, have been systematically engaged for years in breaking the law. So if they were to concede that securitisation is illegal, WHICH IT IS, they might well fear that their cases would be thrown out by the Courts, since all contracts entered into so as to facilitate fraud and crime, are null and void. The consequences would be unimaginable.

Therefore, the avalanche of Court cases that is confidently anticipated in the aftermath of the SEC Complaint against Goldman Sachs – which will serve the interests of the Democrats this election year as well as the urgent obfuscation needs of the SEC itself – will all themselves be duplicitous, since the SEC and the institutions bringing these lawsuits will, as noted, be pin-pointing specific breaches of the Securities Acts and of SEC Rules and Regulations, when the very activity in which they were engaged was itself fraudulent and criminal in the first place under US law.

No doubt some evil brains had already worked this one out. But since the genie has long since lost sight of the bottle from which it escaped due to the exposures, you can probably see now that the entire Fraudulent Finance derivatives securitisation party resembles the assembly hall against a pillar of which Sampson leaned, when he caused the entire upper storey and roof to fall in on the complacent, jeering spectators feasting within.

GREECE AND PORTUGAL POISED TO DESTROY THE EURO
Under the preceding Greek Government, Citibank, Athens, as we have long since reported, was the counterparty for illicit off-balance sheet derivatives trading operations.

In the United States, all securitisation is illegal [see report dated 18th April 2010]. But this does not apply in non-Common Law countries. Therefore, such dubious, illicit trading operations are ‘semi-legitimised’ by the foreign counterparty’s participation (in the eyes of the US perpetrators).

• As a consequence of this Fraudulent Finance activity, Greece accumulated a huge portfolio of derivative assets held off-balance sheet, which are worthless.

Having been massively engaged in similar Fraudulent Finance activity, as a willing and actively instrumental partner, only to be double-crossed and deceived like every other participating counterparty by the CIA and the Bush Crime Family, Germany has been ‘enronised’, too – and its own cupboard is accordingly bare. Therefore, Germany cannot help Greece (not least given that there are countries like Portugal which are about to ‘blow’ too). Hence, after its usual weeks of bombast, the EU Collective’s necessary decision to ‘bring in the International Monetary Fund’.

In an interview with der Spiegel, Wolfgang Schauble, the German Finance Minister, demanded that Germans should support a joint EU-IMF bailout for Greece with up to 45 billion Euros, in order to avoid a ‘financial meltdown’. And Herr Schauble made the following revealing observations, too:

‘Greece’s debts are all in Euros, but it isn’t clear who holds how much of these debts’ – because under Fraudulent Finance off-balance sheet securitisation arrangements below the radar, nobody has any information about any other tiers of participants. So the German Finance Minister clearly understands the core problem. He therefore elaborated:

‘The consequences of a national bankruptcy would be incalculable. Greece is just as systemically important as a major bank’.

Given the postponement due to the travel restrictions imposed by the stupid European authorities themselves [see above] of talks between officials from the IMF, the European Commission and the European Central Bank at the Greek Foreign Ministry on 19th April, the cost of insuring against a Greek default rocketed upwards. Specifically, five-year Greek Credit Default Swaps surged from 438.2 basis points on 16th April, to a peak level of 4.82 percentage points – meaning that it cost 482,000 Euros to insure every 10 million Euros’ worth of five-year Greek Government bonds.

Portugal’s situation is extremely precarious, with the former IMF Chief Economist, Simon Johnson, on record as stating recently that Portugal is ‘on the verge of bankruptcy’. While its public sector indebtedness, at 84% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) this year, is lower than Greece’s 124% (2010 estimates by the European Commission), in 2008 Portuguese private sector debt reached 239% of GDP, compared to 123% for Greece. Portuguese private debt is now thought to exceed 300% of its Gross Domestic Product.

WE WARNED THIS WOULD HAPPEN IN THE RUN-UP TO 1999: IT’S ON THE RECORD
Since, during the run-up to Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) in 1999, we repeatedly warned in International Currency Review that the attempt to unify divergent economies and currencies would be bound eventually to collapse, we have very little sympathy for all the hand-wringing that is now fashionable, especially by financial journalists who weren’t around when our clear warnings were published (they remain accessible, of course, in libraries around the world).

Likewise we have even less sympathy for the ideologues who are now reported to be ‘mystified’ as to why the Portuguese economy fell apart in the 1990s – with productivity at 64% of the average for the EU-15 ‘Member States’. The Europhiliacs thought that the southern European ‘Member States’’ economies would converge ‘over time’. But time has been called on their knee-jerk delusions.

A financial correspondent for The Daily Telegraph commented on 19th April:

‘This should be no surprise. A study of the Latin Monetary Union after 1865 by Kee-Hong Bae and Warren Bailey showed that there was no economic convergence for half a century. Weak states cheated, inflating stealthily by dumping silver coins on others. The project was kept alive by French subsidies. That is what haunts Germany today’.

Our heart bleeds. It is the pan-Germans who have masterminded and driven this EU project for generations, but most especially since publication of the Nazi planning compendium Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft [European Economic Community] in Berlin in 1942 [see the Editor’s works The European Union Collective and The New Underworld Order]. So what we are being told is that the Germans are having to contemplate the bitter taste of the medicine that they prescribed, in their arrogance, for the Rest of Europe.

In prescribing this medicine, they were driven by their hegemony ambitions, rather than by proper consideration of the consequences for their intended satrap EU ‘Member States’. Now, because Germany is itself the biggest storehouse of worthless derivative off-balance sheet fake assets on earth and is therefore effectively bust, it has had to concede that the International Monetary Fund must be involved – which is absolutely NOT what the pan-Germans originally had in mind. On the contrary, their ‘vision’ was that Germany should become not merely the industrial powerhouse of German-controlled Europe after stealing the industries of others, but its financial centre as well.

Given that, like the criminalist operatives at the highest levels in the United States, Germans are typically incapable of discerning when they have been defeated and their game is up, they are persisting – along with the brainwashed leaders of the satrap European ‘Member States’ – with a political project which, whether they choose to accept it or not, is doomed to eventual collapse.

The Greeks basically threatened to pull out of EMU if they didn’t get bailed out (using some pointed remarks about Nazi abuse of Greece in the past); so rather than allow the weak Greek economy to recover through an urgently necessary devaluation of their currency, to save their thick skins they prefer instead to bottle Greece up for generations in a downward spiral of deflation.

The brainwashed Greek Euro-ideologues need to seize the initiative and get out from under, even though it’s being argued, naturally, that this would bankrupt the country as the price of insuring its bonds, already through the roof, would hit the highest level of the building and emerge into the stratosphere. It’s a choice between reviving the economy through a unilateral devaluation having restored the Drachma, or painful descent towards irreversible collapse as a failed state, later.

• And although Portugal’s case is different, the same outcome basically applies.

Believe it or not, ‘Nick’ Clegg, the Liberal Democrat Euro-ideologue who has risen to the top of the British electoral pile due to the stupidity of ‘Conservative’ Central Office’ in allowing Mr Cameron to participate in these fake TV ‘Debates’, is a rabid enthusiast for Britain joining the Euro. He thinks it’s a ‘good thing’ for a country to lose control of its currency, monetary and ultimately fiscal policy. This man is extremely dangerous, a brainwashed Euro-ideologue, and as stupid and pig-headed as the pan-Germans. He can see what is happening in the Eurozone, but looks the other way.

THE IMF’S DOUBLE-TAXATION PROPOSAL FOR BANKS
The IMF Press Room was electrified when the IMF released advance and leaked information from a confidential document prepared for the Group of Twenty (G-20) meeting of Finance Ministers being held this week in Washington. The International Monetary Fund has proposed the following two taxes on (corrupt) financial institutions – which are so unpopular worldwide, that the likelihood of these proposals being implemented must be rated quite high:

• A Financial Stability Contribution, which would represent a levy to finance any future support in an incipient systemic crisis.

• A Financial Activities Tax levied on the sum of profits gained at financial institutions and the remuneration of bank officers and traders. The Fund stated that this tax would be the least distortionary method of raising money from banks.

Meanwhile the latest issue of the Fund’s Global Stability Report has warned that sharply rising sovereign debt will exert further pressures on lending markets coincident with the world’s banks trying to refinance some $5.0 trillion in short-term borrowings – a round-about way of saying that a large number of banks all over the world, are bust.

But the International Monetary Fund also needs to distance itself from any residual whiff of internal corruption. One way of achieving this would be to close internal ‘offshore’ accounts held within the Fund by such dubious characters as former US Presidents, including William Jefferson Rockefeller-Clinton. We know that the dialectical, duplicity norm applies right across this sector. But one would have thought that, with all that has been revealed – and is now swamping the ‘mainstream’ media, despite its belated arrival at the party – it’s definitively clean-up time, at last.

Notes and references:

(1): Eesti Pank: Persoonid ja saladused, Urmas Kaji, Talinn, 2003, page 145.

(2): Ibid, page 140

(3): Kesknädalo, 6th December 2000.

(4): Data on Siim Kallas extracted with permission from a collection of essays by Ashley Mote, former MEP for South East England, and based on an article first published in 2008, confirmed in part by our own separate information.

(5): Weather Eye, Paul Simons, The Times, London, 19 April 2010, page 61.

(6) ‘Days are turned to nights as clouds of falling ash cover everything in sight’, Hildur Helga Sigurdardottir, reporting from Reykyavik, The Times, London, 19th April 2010.

(7): Assets Of Representative Nancy Pelosi: Democrat-CA:

• 1600 Atlas Peak Road, Napa, CA
• 235 Twelve Inc. LLC Common Stock (= 235 Second Twelve Inc. LLC)
• 25 Point Lobos, San Francisco, CA: Commercial Property
• 45 Belden Place, San Francisco, CA: 4-storey commercial building
• 723 Mule Ears Court, Norden, CA: Town home
• 820 Sir Francis Drake Blvd., San Anselmo, CA: Commercial Property
• Access Technology Partners, LP
• Adaytum Software, Inc.: Common Stock
• Advanced Fiber Communications: Public Common Stock
• Agile Software
• Alliance Gaming Corp.: Public Common Stock
• Alter Ego: Common Stock
• Amazon.com: Public Common Stock
• America’s Doctors.com: Common Stock
• Aplion.com: Common Stock
•Apogee Networks, Inc.: Common Stock
•Aristotle Publishing, Inc.: Common Stock
•Ashlar, Inc.: Common Stock
•AT&T Public: Common Stock
•Atipa Fund B (see Oculan Corporation)
•Attenza, LLC: Common Stock
•Auberge du Soleil, Rutherford, CA: Owns resort hotel
•Avaya: Public Common Stock
•Bank of America, San Francisco
•Bank of America, Washington, DC
•Beacon Education Management: Common Stock
•BF Enterprises: Common Stock
•Borel Estate Company: Owns shopping center
•Briazz: Public Common Stock
•Broadcom Corp.: Public Common Stock
•Broadway Property, San Francisco, CA: Real Estate Option
•Builder’s Info. Group: Common Stock (Formerly Netclerk)
•Bullhorn (Formerly Bridgepath LLC: Common Stock)
•Calico Commerce: Public Common Stock
•Chalone Wine Group, Ltd.
•Cierra Photonics: Common Stock
•Cisco Systems, Inc.: Common Stock
•CMGI, Inc.: Common Stocks
•Co-Net (Formerly Simplexis.com): Common Stock
•Coach, Inc.: Public common stock
•Collab.net: Common Stock
•Collaborative Group: Common Stock
•ComCast: Public Common Stock
•Command Audio: Common Stock
•Commerce One, Inc.: Common Stock
•Congressional Credit Union, Washington, DC
•CopperCom, Inc.: Common Stock
•Covalent Technologies: Common Stock
•Critical Path Inc.: Public Common Stock
•Currenex: Common Stock (Formerly FX Trades)
•Digital Fountain: Common Stock
•Digital Intelligence (Now Picture IQCorp)
•EDI Associates, Mill Valley, CA: Hotel Investment
•Emulex: Public Common Stock
•Engage, Inc.: Common Stock
•Evident: Common Stock (Formerly Apogee)
•Fastnet: Common Stock
•Financial Leasing Services, S.F., CA: Investment company
•Forty-Five Belden Corp., S.F., CA: Investment Company
•Genetope Corp.: Public Common Stock
•Getty Images, Inc.: Public Common Stock
•Granite Ventures, LP
•Guru.com: Common Stock (now Unicru)
•IKnowMed Systems, Inc.
•Infospace, Inc.: Public common stock
•Interloci, LLC: Public Common Stock
•Internap Delaware: Common Stock (formerly Internap Network Services)
•Internap Network Services, LLC: Common Stock (= Internap Delaware)
•Internet Cap. Group: Public Stock
•Intraop, LLC: Common Stock
•Japan Partners: Common Stock (AKA Isochron Data Corp.)
•Jet Blue Air: Public Common Stock
•Johnson & Johnson: Public Common Stock
•Learning Technologies, Inc.- Common Stock
•LEG Partners, III, LP: Common Stock
•Liberate Technologies: Public Common Stock
•Lionis Gate Limited Partnership (Cordavalle): Golf Development Partnership
•Lucent Techonolgies: Public Common Stock (Formerly Nexabit)
•LuxN, LLC: Common Stock
•McGrath Rentcorp, Inc.: Public Common Stock
•Microsoft Corp.: Public Common Stock
•MontaVista, LLC: Common Stock
•Mosher Partners, LP, Sacramento, CA: Real Estate Partnership
•Natelli Communities: Real Estate Partnership
•Nautilus Leasing Services: Container leasing company
•Navis Holdings, LLC: Common Stock
•Net2Phone, Inc.: Public Common Stock
•Netcessity: Common Stock
•NetSchools Corp.: Common Stock (Now Plato-Common Stock)
•Niku Corp.: Public Common Stock
•Niman Ranch: Common Stock
•Nine Forty Five Battery, LLC, San Francisco, CA: Real Estate Partnership
•Nine Hundred One Battery, San Francisco, CA: Real Estate Partnership
•Oakwood Homes Corp: Bonds
•Oculan Corp: Common Stock
•Odyssey, LLC: Common stock
•Orlimar, LLC: Common Stock
•Overstock.com: Public Common Stock
•Pacific Island Resources LLC: Common Stock
•Piatti Restaurant Co., Tiburon, CA: Restaurant Opening Company
•Picture IQ Corp.: Common Stock (AKA Digital Intelligence)
•Plato: Common Stock (Formerly Netschools: Common Stock)
•Plumtree Software, Inc.: Common Stock
•Polycom: Public Common Stock
•Potomac Investment Association, Gaithersburg, MD: Real Estate Partnership
•Procure Point: Common Stock
•QIC (Quinton Instrument Company): Public Common Stock (Now Quinton Cardiology Sys., Inc.)
•QualComm, Inc.: Public Common Stock
•Rainmaker Systems, Inc: Common Stock
•Read-Rite Corp, Inc.: Public Common Stock
•Ready Router (Now Netcessity)
•Recommender 2: Common Stock
•Redenvelope: Public Common stock
•REOF V: Real Estate Partnership
•RF Micro Devices, Inc: Public Common Stock
•Robert Half Intl., Inc.: Public Common Stock
•Salesforce.com, LLC: Common Stock
•Salon.com: Public Common Stock
•Shutterfly: Common Stock
•Skellenger Lane, Rutherford, CA: 8-acre vineyard
•Slam Dunk Networks, Inc.
•Sonus Networks, Inc.-Public Stock
•Speakeasy, Inc.: Common Stock
•Spirian, LLC: Common Stock
•Stoneridge, LLC
•Sun Microsystems: Public Common Stock
•Support Inc.: Common Stock (AKA Support Soft, Inc.)
•TeraOp, LLC: Common Stock
•Thirteen Hundred One Sansome, LLC: Real Estate Partnership
•Tripath Technology, Inc.: Common Stock
•Trivium Systems, Inc: Common Stock
•Trux Gate Associates Ltd, Real Estate Partnership
•Unicru Common Stock (Formerly Guru.com)
•Union Bank of California, San Francisco, CA: savings account
•USA DR: Common Stock
•Vanguard Airlines, Inc: Public Common Stock
•Wells Fargo Bank, San Francisco, CA: Savings account
•Witness Sys, Inc.: Public Common Stock
•Xtreme Spectrum, Inc.: Common Stock
•Yantra Corp: Common Stock
•Yerac Associates: Investments
•Zinfandel Lane, St. Helena, CA

(8): ‘Sarkozy shuts out chief spin doctor’, report from Paris by Henry Samuel,
The Daily Telegraph, 13th April 2007.

(9): It should be understood that, self-evidently, obtaining information on such sensitive issues is difficult; and, at best, the only information that may become available is couched in general terms.

NOTICES:
Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

POLAND’S SUSPICIOUS SECOND KATYN MASSACRE TRAGEDY

cropped-chrisstory

25-YEAR-OLD TUPOLEV HAD BEEN ‘OVERHAULED’ IN RUSSIA MONTHS EARLIER

Sunday 11 April 2010 00:30

• UPDATE: OUR SUSPICIONS ARE YET FURTHER STRENGTHENED:
Since we posted this report, we have learned as follows:

(1): President Mikheil Saakashvili of Georgia has stated on a CNN interview that quote ‘something incredibly evil was involved here’ without elaborating or explaining what he was implying. The interview can be seen at this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycj2CCkDx3s

(2): A close examination of the precise terrain WEST of the Smolensk-Severnyi military airport reveals that for an extended area, the terrain is DISTINCTLY LOWER than the airport itself, which is situated on a sort of plateau. The area to the WEST of the military airport is between 100 and 150 feet BELOW the plateau. In THAT case, the plane COULD NOT HAVE SCRAPED THE TOPS OF TREES, unless the trees were about 400 feet high.

(3): The investigation is being carried out under the supervision of Prime Minister Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, a senior GRU (Soviet Military Intelligence) Officer. Since any preplanned sabotage would precisely have been organised by the GRU, the investigation has of course been placed in the hands of the perpetrators, which is standard practice in these cover-up operations, in both the covert Soviet Union and the United States: in case you didn’t know.

(4): An article in The Guardian cites a Polish MP who attended the memorial gathering in the Katyn forests, having travelled there by train, who claims that at the time of the alleged ‘accident’, which occurred just before 11:00 a.m., there were blue skies* over Katyn, which is located about ten miles from the crash site. The Polish MP’s remark is found at the end of the article: here’s the link:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/apr/11/poland-president-plane-crash-kaczynski

• See also the following article in the Daily Mail:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1265482/Leck-Kaczynski-Russia-engineered-plane-crash-claims-Polish-MP.html#ixzz0l07Zpee3

(5): We have had one violently indignant reaction from a Pole who protests too much. Without attaching overmuch importance to this, we suggest that it may imply NERVOUSNESS THAT THE COVER-UP ‘LINE’ IS FULL OF HOLES. It’s news to us that trees grow 400 feet tall in that region.

(6): An Italian source, informazionescorretta.blogspot.com, reported on 14th April as follows:
• Three Russian boys heard and saw an explosion before the crash.

• Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk had already decided to devalue to zloty, contrary to the unwritten and arrogant rule that currencies adjacent to the Eurozone and in competition with the Euro cannot be devalued without the kind permission of Berlin, Paris and Frankfurt.

• At least five of the Polish Ministers who were killed were being investigated for corruption.

• The Military chiefs on the aircraft were mainly overt Communist-era holdovers. They were resisting international pressures and were about to be compelled to resign.

• An aircraft crammed with Polish journalists landed just 40 minutes after the crash, and went straight to Katyn, as though nothing had happened.

(7): The pilot is reported by Polish sources to have been struggling with defective altimeter and airspeed indicators. There are reports that radar revealed that the plane was only 10 metres off the ground, which is inconsistent with the treetop story. It should be noted that a favourite DVD crash stratagem is to fiddle PRECISELY with the altimeter and speed indicators. This is in fact a known hallmark of a DVD OPERATION, raising suspicions of collaboration by foreign intelligence or even of a METABRIDGE OP. (Mossad-CIA-MI-6-DVD), as the Poles had snubbed the IMF over Greece.

* We had blue skies for days here in Buckinghamshire, so this of course makes sense.

• AIRCRASH HAS ALL THE HALLMARKS OF A ‘PREPLANNED ACCIDENT’

• THE KEY FIGURES IDENTIFIED AMONG THE CASUALTIES

• ALL POLAND’S TOP PEOPLE WIPED OUT IN ONE HIT

• SUSPICIOUS TIMING AND OVERHAUL THE OLD SOVIET TU-154

• LONG ARM OF RUSSIA’S CLENCHED FIST DEPLOYED

• NOTE: Because of the Second Katyn massacre, we initially had to ‘interrupt’ display of the report entitled ‘ALL UK LEGISLATION PASSED SINCE 2000 IS NULL AND VOID’, posted on 10th April 2010. We have now restored that report as the main display, with a very important UPDATE.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

SECURITIZATION IS ILLEGAL UPDATE: In the Subs/Books Update panel immediately below the NEWS panel that you are currently viewing, you will see an announcement concerning publication of Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 7 & 8. If you press that announcement text and open up the panel, you will see the contents list for the new [2010Q1] issue of E.I.R., including a breakdown of the Chapter Headings for the detailed analysis showing that Securitization is illegal. See our NEWS report dated 10th March 2010 for summaries of some of the data from this analysis. We understand that the report has created uproar in certain corridors of corrupt power.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• AS PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED, OUR LANDLINES REMAIN CLOSED BECAUSE OF UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT. WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL OR THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

AIRCRASH HAS ALL THE HALLMARKS OF A ‘PREPLANNED ACCIDENT’
It is most unlikely that the fatal crash shortly before 11:00 a.m. on 10th April of a Polish Government Tupolev Tu-154 aircraft near the Smolensk-Severnyi military airport, was an accident. It looked just like an accident, given that the airplane sliced treetops on its fourth attempt to land in heavy fog, disintegrating about one mile from the airport. There had been ‘suggestions’ that the plane should divert to Minsk. There were no survivors.

The 60-year-old President of Poland, Lech Kaczynski, was leading a delegation of highest-level Polish officials to attend memorial ceremonies at Katyn, the site of the massacre of 22,000 Poles by Soviet terrorist operatives 70 years ago.

As a consequence of that massacre in 1940 et seq., all possible sources of subsequent resistance to Soviet control in Poland were liquidated in one operation.

The casualty list of those who perished in the Tupolev Tu-154 crash on Saturday implies that Polish sources of problems considered to be intractable by Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin (Shalomov), of Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU), and Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachëv (KGB-FSB-covert Party) from his administrative wing inside the Kremlin complex, have likewise been liquidated in what can be considered to be ‘the second Katyn Massacre’.

THE KEY FIGURES IDENTIFIED AMONG THE CASUALTIES
Among the dead were the following:

• Blasik, Andrzej, Chief of the Polish Air Force.
• Bochenek, Krystyna, Deputy Speaker of the Polish Senate.
• Chodakowski, Archbishop Miron, Orthodox Ordinary of the Polish Army.
• Deptula, Leszek, Member of the Sejm (Lower House of Parliament).
• Dolniak, Grzegorz, Member of the Sejm.
• Fetlinska, Janina, Member of the Polish Senate.
• Gagor, General Franciszek, Chief of the Polish Army General Staff.
• Gesicka, Grazyna, Member of the Sejm.
• Gosiewski, Przemyslaw, Member of the Sejm.
• Handzlik, Mariusz, Undersecretary of State in President’s Office.
• Jaruga-Nowacka, Izabela, Member of the Sejm.
• Karpiniuk, Sebastian, Member of the Sejm.
• Karweta, Vice Admiral Andrzej, Commander-in-Chief of the Polish Navy.
• Kaczynski, Lech, President of the Republic of Poland.
• Kaczynski, Mrs, wife of the President of the Republic.
• Kochanowski, Janusz, Polish Ombudsman for Citizen Rights.
• Kremer, Andrzej, Polish Deputy Foreign Minister.
• Kurtyka, Janusz, Historian and President of the Institute of National Remembrance.
• Natalli-Swiat, Aleksandra, Member of the Sejm.
• Nurowski, Piotr, President of the Polish Olympic Committee.
• Plazynski, Maciej, President of the Polish Community Association.
• Ploski, Tadeusz, Bishop of the Military Ordinariate of the Polish Army.
• Przewoznik, Andrzej, Secretary-General, Council for Protection of Struggle and Martyrdom Sites.
• Putra, Krzysztof, Deputy Speaker of the Sejm.
• Rumianek, Ryszard, Rector of the Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University.
• Rybicki, Arkadiusz, Member of the Sejm.
• Skrzypek, Slawomir, President of the National Bank of Poland.
• Stasiak, Wladyslaw, Chief of the Office of the President of the Republic of Poland.
• Szczyglo, Aleksander, Head of the National Security Bureau.
• Szmajdzinski, Jerzy, Deputy Speaker of the Sejm.
• Szymanek-Deresz, Jolanta, Member of the Sejm.
• Walentynowicz, Anna, free trade union activist, member of Solidarity (Solidarity heroine).
• Wassermann, Zbigniew, Member of the Sejm.
• Woda, Wieslaw, Member of the Sejm.
• Wojtas, Edward, Member of the Sejm.
• Wypych, Pawel, Secretary of State in the Office of the President of the Republic of Poland.
• Zajac, Stanislaw, Member of the Senate
… and several other Members of the Sejm.

ALL POLAND’S TOP PEOPLE WIPED OUT IN ONE HIT
To recapitulate, Poland lost, in addition to the President of the Polish Republic and his wife:

• The Chief of the Polish Air Force.
• The Chief of the Polish Army General Staff.
• The Commander-in-chief of the Polish Navy.
= ALL THE MILITARY SERVICE CHIEFS.

• The head of Polish Intelligence (National Security Bureau).

• The three top officials inside the Office of the President of the Republic.

• The Governor of the National Bank of Poland.

• The Deputy Foreign Minister of Poland.

SUSPICIOUS TIMING AND OVERHAUL THE OLD SOVIET TU-154
Moreover the timing of this ‘planned accident’ is highly suspicious. For starters, the 25-year-old aircraft had undergone a complete overhaul at a factory in southern Russia late last year, being delivered to the Polish authorities in December 2009.

This makes a planned malfunction likely, especially given that the Katyn massacre ceremony, to be held 70 years after the atrocity, was of course ‘known in advance’.

Issues contemporaneous with this catastrophe include:

• Most conspicuously, the peak level of intergovernmental tensions surrounding the disposition and settlement of diverted and stolen funds, given not least that Poland was exploited during the Bush II Administration, when the US Ambassador to Poland was a known George W. Bush crony (to go into no further details here) and Polish institutions were flooded with the proceeds of illicit off-balance sheet trades leveraged off diverted and stolen funds.

• The projected use of the Polish Army’s Ustka-Wicko base as a possible site for US missile interceptors. Russia objected strongly and suspended participation in the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe.

• Contracts for Western aircraft.

LONG ARM OF RUSSIA’S CLENCHED FIST DEPLOYED
Historically, when Poland tries to align itself with the West, Russia has deployed the long arm of its clenched fist – starting with the Katyn massacre of thousands of Polish officers and key political leaders, so that come the Russian occupation, there was minimal opposition from Poles trying to defend their freedom.

In 1943, Polish General Sikorski’s plane crashed, and the General was killed, off Gibraltar, around the time of the Tehran Conference that set the scene for the catastrophic Yalta Conference, which consigned Poland to Soviet control after the war.

And exiled Polish leaders who returned home after the war were ‘tried’ and executed in the late 1940s and early 1950s by the Soviets and by their Polish puppet Communist governments.

Similar peculiarities were noted elsewhere in Eastern Europe: for instance, the Czech President suddenly ‘committed suicide’ in 1948 by jumping off a balcony immediately ahead of free elections which never happened.

Now we have the instant liquidation, in one operation, of the Polish President and his wife, the chiefs of the three Polish military services, the Polish Intelligence Chief, the three top officials from the late Polish President’s Office (who knew everything), and the Governor of the National Bank of Poland – killed in an old Soviet aircraft which had undergone a ‘complete overhaul’ in a southern Russian factory only four months earlier.

The German DVD ‘Black agency’ is known for its expertise in fiddling with aircraft controls to procure delayed crashes. It is a ‘talent’ shared with its secret allies, the covert Soviet GRU-KGB.

Key signatories required for crucial contemporaneous financial undertakings would of course have been those of the President and the Governor of the National Bank of Poland.

No wonder the Russian President, Dmitry Medvedev (Menakhem Aaronovich Mendel’) appointed GRU-Prime Minister Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin (Shalomov) to head a commission to ‘investigate’ the crash – despatching the Russian Minister for Emergency Situations, the well-known ‘former’ Communist apparatchik Sergei Shoigu, to the crash site.

• Any evidence of pre-planned delayed sabotage will need to have been identified and removed from the scene smartish.

NOTICES:
Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

ALL UK LEGISLATION PASSED SINCE 2000 IS NULL AND VOID

cropped-chrisstory

IMPLICATIONS OF MISMANAGEMENT OF ‘REFORM’ OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS

Saturday 10 April 2010 01:01

• We REPOSTED this report on 21st April for some hours. As a consequence, the links to the report DOUBLED OVERNIGHT, to 7,040. Our monitoring of the links to this report has revealed massive ongoing interference. The highly revealing data on this score have now been repositioned at the foot of this report. You’ll see that the report basically ‘went viral’, and that Google has had great difficulty controlling it. The doubling of the links overnight speaks for itself.

• Please also note that THIS IS THE ORIGINAL REPORT ON THIS SUBJECT.

UPDATE: BRITAIN FACES A COLOSSAL CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS
Now that the deception over the Hereditary Peers’ Letters Patent has been placed decisively in the public domain [see below] THE CRISIS CAN NO LONGER BE GLOSSED OVER AND IGNORED.

• That’s what they will try to do, but they can’t.

Here are the issues that the UK Political and Bureaucratic Establishment face which PRECLUDE the usual cynical official procedure of pretending there’s no problem here:

• The nation will have to be told that TEN YEARS’ WORTH OF LAWS don’t exist in reality, only on paper, and that all legislation since 2000 is NULL AND VOID.

The European Union Collective will have to be informed that none of the legislation that it has inflicted on the Westminster Parliament since 2000 is valid, the whole lot being NULL AND VOID*.

• The Privy Council, the Lord President of the Council (Lord Mandelson!), the Lord Privy Seal (Harriet Harman QC, MP!), an office combined with the office of Leader of the House of Commons, and whoever else advises The Queen as Head of State, will HAVE to grasp this nettle and inform Her Majesty that all the Bills she has signed since 2000 are NULL AND VOID.

• All foreign and Commonwealth Governments will have to receive a Diplomatic Note from Her Majesty’s Government to the same effect. THIS CANNOT BE DELAYED, or there will be serious consequences arising from thorny UK legislative issues affecting governments abroad.

• The Hereditary Peers will have to petition The Queen EN MASSE for Her Majesty to intervene to enable the Hereditary Peers’ reinstatement to the House of Lords and the return of their Letters Patent. If the Government have taken custody of the Letters Patent of Hereditary Peers whose Letters Patent were granted centuries ago, that is another scandal.

• NO FURTHER LEGISLATION CAN BE PASSED BY PARLIAMENT until this mess has been sorted. Not now that the whole world knows about this unconstitutional, unlawful and illegal state of affairs.

• If the usual British official modus operandi of IGNORING THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM and pretending that the problem doesn’t exist is adopted, there will be very serious accumulating, ongoing consequences for ALL ELEMENTS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL SETTLEMENT, and the situation could run completely out of control before the Establishment has had breakfast.

* When informing Brussels that the past ten years’ worth of Westminster legislation is VOID, the opportunity should be taken to add that remittance of taxpayers’ funds into the hands of a criminal enterprise is illegal (as we have proved), according to the UK Serious Fraud Office.

The European Commission’s accounts have not been approved by the EU’s own Court of Auditors in Luxembourg for the past FOURTEEN YEARS, which reveals that the European Commission is operating UNLAWFULLY AND ILLEGALLY, and thus that the British Government is committing an ongoing CRIMINAL OFFENCE by remitting the proceeds of its VAT collections to Brussels. UK VAT taxpayers may have a case against the Government for illegally diverting their VAT tax remittances.

It ALSO means that the Member Governments can sue the European Commission for the RETURN OF THEIR UNLAWFULLY REMITTED VALUE ADDED TAX PAYMENTS plus compound interest going back for fourteen years, as the European Commission is criminally retaining their taxpayers’ funds remitted by the Member Governments in error.

• As we recommended last autumn, and previously, British VAT accruals should be placed into a special Treasury account, to be offset against the colossal Government deficit and to pay down the permissive debt incurred by the discredited Labour Government.

• It is ANOTHER SCANDAL OF IMMENSE PROPORTIONS that the British Government sees fit to commit the crime of remitting its taxpayers’ funds into the hands of a criminal enterprise when the country is all but bankrupt thanks to the Government’s stupidity and profligacy, when the accruals in question CAN LEGITIMATELY BE DIVERTED INTO OFFSETTING THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE GOVERNMENT’S SPENDTHRIFT BEHAVIOUR.

• That would CUT SHORT THE DISHONEST ELECTION CAMPAIGN NON-DEBATE about how the deficit and the colossal volume of unnecessary new official debt are going to be addressed.

All in all, therefore, we have the ingredients of an IMMENSE CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS right across the political-financial spectrum. IGNORING THIS WILL HAVE FATAL CONSEQUENCES.

• SUBVERSIVE PLAN TO IMPOSE FIXED-TERM PARLIAMENTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM

• ‘CONSERVATIVE’ LEADER DAVID CAMERON BACKS THIS WHEEZE, TOO

• MONARCH’S KEY RESIDUAL POWER IS TO CALL FOR
A SUITABLE CANDIDATE TO FORM A GOVERNMENT

• ALL LEGISLATION PASSED BY THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT SINCE 2000 IS NULL AND VOID

• HEREDITARY PEERS NOT REMOVABLE BY GENERAL LEGISLATION

• AUTHORITY FOR THIS STATEMENT ISSUED BY THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT ITSELF

• ANALYSIS OF BARONESS ASHTON’S LORDS STATEMENT

• 900 HEREDITARY PEER-SPECIFIC BILLS WOULD BE NEEDED

• BOTCHED OBFUSCATION OF BLAIR’S HAM-FISTED MISCALCULATION

• THE UNLAWFUL REMOVAL OF PEERS’ PASSES TO THE LORDS

• RECAPITULATION OF THE ANALYSIS TO THIS POINT

• HOUSE OF LORDS WAS THEN PACKED WITH BLAIR’S CRONIES

• DEFINITIVE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS BOTCHED REVOLUTIONARY OPERATION

• HOW THIS CHAOTIC STATE OF AFFAIRS CAN BE RECTIFIED WITH MINIMAL HASSLE

• WHY THE REVOLUTIONARIES HAVE SHOT THEMSELVES IN THE FOOT

• POSTSCRIPT: NOTHING THE NEW PARLIAMENT PASSES WILL BE VALID, EITHER

• ‘SCUM OF THE EARTH’, ‘TOO CLEVER BY HALF’

• WITHOUT ABOLITION OF THE 1999 ACT, THE GENERAL ELECTION IS POINTLESS

• Reiminder: The report dated 11th April 2010 entitled ‘POLAND’S SUSPICIOUS SECOND KATYN MASSACRE TRAGEDY’ can be accessed at once by pressing ‘Archive’ or the Archive button.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

SECURITIZATION IS ILLEGAL UPDATE: In the Subs/Books Update panel immediately below the NEWS panel that you are currently viewing, you will see an announcement concerning publication of Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 7 & 8. If you press that announcement text and open up the panel, you will see the contents list for the new [2010Q1] issue of E.I.R., including a breakdown of the Chapter Headings for the detailed analysis showing that Securitization is illegal. See our NEWS report dated 10th March 2010 for summaries of some of the data from this analysis. We understand that the report has created uproar in certain corridors of corrupt power.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• AS PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED, OUR LANDLINES REMAIN CLOSED BECAUSE OF UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT. WE CAN BE CONTACTED VIA EMAIL OR THE WEBSITE ‘CONTACT US’ FACILITY.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

SUBVERSIVE PLAN TO IMPOSE FIXED-TERM PARLIAMENTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
Having successfully degraded Britain’s public finances and its currency, first by years of inordinate socialist public spending and then by burdening all future generations with unconscionable public debt obligations because he didn’t like the sight of Argentine-style queues of customers lining the streets to withdraw their savings from the corrupt Northern Rock bank, the international socialist British Prime Minister Gordon Brown is secretly continuing the subversive operation launched by his corrupt predecessor, Tony Blair, to destroy the Monarchy and to convert Britain into a Republic.

Mounting evidence that the revolutionary UK Labour Government seeks the destruction of the Monarchy was confirmed on 8th April, when Brown stated, at the outset of the General Election campaign, that he will introduce fixed-term Parliaments and a referendum on the reform of the British first-past-the-post voting system if Labour is re-elected on 6th May.

In announcing an intention to impose fixed-term Parliaments, Brown is clearly accommodating the Campaign for Fixed-Term Parliaments – an innocuous-sounding but in fact thoroughly subversive, revolutionary so-called ‘cross-party’ initiative that has been campaigning behind the scenes to persuade gormless politicians whose brains reside mainly in their boots that the Prime Minister’s power to call for an election at the time of his choosing is by some alchemy an anti-democratic constitutional anachronism, and should be replaced by a fixed term of four or five years.

• Any such ‘reform’ would be consistent with, and would pressupose, the conversion of Britain into a chaotic Republic like the worst extant contemporary example, the United States: see why, below.

• Another clue here is that nobility (and ‘fake’ nobility, such as is represented by Blair’s cronies in the House of Lords) is incompatible with any Republican form of Government. [The original 13th Amendment to the US Constitution, drafted around 1800, banned Titles, Nobles and Esquires, and barred such title-holders from being US citizens and therefore from holding high office, a state of affairs that triggered the War of 1812 with Britain, leading to the sacking of Washington in 1814; whereupon the 13th Amendment was quietly dropped, with the assumption being that it was not ratified. However in recent years, state-by-state archival research has proved that it WAS ratified].

‘CONSERVATIVE’ LEADER DAVID CAMERON BACKS THIS WHEEZE, TOO
On 26th May 2009, the ‘Conservative’ David Cameron – front man for the alternative intelligence-promoted (Notting Hill) clique that has been readied, US-style, to replace the intelligence-promoted (Islington) claque headed by Blair and Brown from the 1990s if the forthcoming election cannot be adequately rigged to ensure a Brown victory – indicated that he is stupid enough to have fallen for this ruse, as well, when he pronounced that ‘a Conservative Government will seriously consider the option of fixed-term Parliaments when there is a majority Government’.

MONARCH’S KEY RESIDUAL POWER IS TO CALL FOR
A SUITABLE CANDIDATE TO FORM A GOVERNMENT
Why does this stance threaten the Monarchy? Answer: because one of the British Monarch’s residual OVERT powers consists in her power to consent to a Prime Minister’s request for a dissolution of Parliament, and her power also, on advice, to call for the elected parliamentary leader most likely to be in a position to form a Government, in the event of uncertainty – powers that may need to be deployed if the outcome of this General Election turns out to be as indecisive as many observers think is extremely likely.

And why can we state without fear of contradiction that the Campaign for Fixed-Term Parliaments is a subversive operation which has as its ultimate objective the overthrow of the Monarchy?

Because this tinkering with the UK Constitution needs to be seen in the context that it follows the Labour Government’s wholly unconstitutional, illegal and unlawful semi-destruction of the House of Lords – which can clearly be viewed as part of the same operation, as will now be demonstrated.

ALL LEGISLATION PASSED BY THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT SINCE 2000 IS NULL AND VOID
Investigations into this dimension of the secret revolutionary plan to destroy the Monarchy – which stands in the way of covertly antagonistic foreign powers’ hegemony strategies – and to convert Britain into a Republic, have yielded the remarkable finding that ALL LEGISLATION PASSED BY THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT SINCE ABOUT 2000 HAS BEEN NULL AND VOID.

• There are NO exceptions, contrary to assertions from some quarters that Finance Bills are not captured by this crisis. Rubbish! ALL Westminster legislation since 2000, INCLUDING all the rubber-stamping of legislation shovelled at us from Brussels, is NULL AND VOID, as explained below.

• PLUS: ALL LEGAL ACTIONS BASED ON LAWS PASSED AT WESTMINSTER SINCE 2000 FALL TO THE GROUND BECAUSE THOSE LAWS ARE BASED ON FRAUDULENT, RIGGED PROCEDURES.

Here’s how this definitive conclusion is reached: bear with us as we step through the evidence as deftly as possible, without omitting any of the necessary simple steps here:

HEREDITARY PEERS NOT REMOVABLE BY GENERAL LEGISLATION
Membership of the House of Lords is dependent upon the issuance, on ennoblement, by officials directly serving the Monarchy, of Letters Patent.

Removal of a Peer of the Realm from his seat in the House of Lords cannot be procured by General Legislation, such as the Blair Government’s House of Lords Act 1999.

This piece of General Legislation did NOT empower Her Majesty’s Government to impede a single Hereditary Peer who had taken his or her seat in the House of Lords after having sworn the Oath of Allegiance to the Crown, from continuing to carry out their solemn duties in the House of Lords as Councillors to the Crown, in accordance with the British Constitution.

AUTHORITY FOR THIS STATEMENT ISSUED BY THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT ITSELF
Please do not argue with this.

The authority for this statement comes from the Labour Government itself:

29 September 2008 : Column WA398:

House of Lords: Letters Patent
Lord Laird asked Her Majesty’s Government:
By what means Letters Patent creating peerages can be changed;
and in what legislation that has occurred. [HL5196]:

The Lord President of the Council (Baroness Ashton of Upholland):

The effect of Letters Patent creating peerages can be changed by legislation which has that specific effect. It cannot be changed by legislation of general application.

Thus, the Peerage Act 1963 allowed Peeresses in their own right to sit in the House of Lords regardless of the terms of any Letters Patent creating the peerage. The House of Lords Act 1999 removed the right of anyone to sit in the House by virtue of a hereditary peerage unless they were specifically excepted from the provisions. Conversely, the House of Lords decided in 1922 in the case of Viscountess Rhondda that the terms of the Sex Disqualification (Removal) Act 1919 were not sufficiently specific to allow her to take her seat in the Lords when her Letters Patent allowed her to inherit the peerage, but not the seat in the Lords. I am aware of only one case in which the effect of individual Letters Patent has been changed by Act of Parliament, which is that of the
Duke of Marlborough in 1706.

ANALYSIS OF BARONESS ASHTON’S LORDS STATEMENT
The first two sentences here are crucial:

‘The effect of Letters Patent creating peerages can be changed by legislation which has that specific effect. It cannot be changed by legislation of general application’.

Having taken their Oath of Allegiance to the Crown, some 900 Hereditary Peers (with the exception of a specified rump group of 92 hereditary peers) had the ‘effect’ of their Letters Patent ostensibly annulled by The House of Lords Act 1999, which was GENERAL LEGISLATION.

However, as Baroness Ashton told the House of Lords on 20th September 2008: ‘The effect… cannot be changed by legislation of general application’.

In standard double-minded fashion, Baroness Ashton then told the Lords that:

‘The House of Lords Act 1999 removed the right of anyone to sit in the House by virtue of a hereditary peerage unless they were specifically excepted from the provisions’.

900 HEREDITARY PEER-SPECIFIC BILLS WOULD BE NEEDED
But since The House of Lords Act 1999 was GENERAL LEGISLATION, the ‘right’ in question, part of the ‘effect’ specified at the beginning of Baroness Ashton’s pronouncement, removed that right illegally, unlawfully and unconstitutionally. Because:

• In order for ‘the effect of Letters Patent’ to be modified, given that it cannot be modified by General Legislation, it is necessary for:

• 900 PEER-SPECIFIC BILLS TO BE PASSED BY PARLIAMENT changing ‘the effect of Letters Patent’, as per Baroness Ashton’s opening sentences:

‘The effect of Letters Patent creating peerages can be changed by legislation which has that specific effect. It cannot be changed by legislation of general application’.

BOTCHED OBFUSCATION OF BLAIR’S HAM-FISTED MISCALCULATION
At some stage early in this process after passage of the 1999 legislation, the Blair Government realised that it had messed up and had browbeaten The Queen to append her signature to an UNCONSTITUTIONAL, UNLAWFUL BILL, with all the hazards associated with such a miscalculation.

So, in order to OBFUSCATE the situation and to smother any ‘untoward consequences’ from the subversive Blair Government’s perspective, Ministers embarked upon two subsidiary underhand, surreptitious, unconstitutional operations:

• First, we are informed that the Labour Government somehow managed to persuade most of the hereditary peers to hand over their Letters Patent to some Government Department (from which extracting the documents will of course be impossible) – notwithstanding that the Letters Patent remain the property of each Hereditary Peer to this day.

• Secondly, immediately after The House of Lords Act 1999 had received the Royal Assent, those hereditary peers whose names were not included among the rump of hereditary peers who were still ‘allowed’ to continue carrying out their duties as Councillors to the Crown, had their passes removed from them, so that they were thereby prevented from gaining access to the Chamber.

• The main traitor in this scandal was the ‘Conservative’ Peer Lord Cranborne, then the leader of the Conservative Party in the House of Lords, who perpetrated this tawdry ‘deal’ with the corrupt Blair behind the backs of the leaders of the Conservative Party.

THE UNLAWFUL REMOVAL OF PEERS’ PASSES TO THE LORDS
The scandalous removal of the hereditary peers’ passes came to light in 2008 when an Hereditary Peer requested a pass so that he could present his Letters Patent, take his oath of Allegiance to the Crown and thereby take his seat in the House of Lords.

When he discovered that the House of Lords authorities would not issue a pass enabling him to gain access to the Chamber, Lord Mereworth wrote as follows to The Lord President of the Council, the responsible official concerned:

The Lord President of the Council
The House of Lords,
Westminster,
London SW1A 0PW
By First Class Special Delivery
22nd June 2009

Dear Lord President,
Please accept the following as a token of esteem. Set out below is the published written question asked by Lord Laird of Artivargan and the written response given by your predecessor Baroness Ashton of Upholland on behalf of Her Majesty’s Government on 29th September 2008.

[see above: Editor].

Given the answer, it is clear that the hereditary peers’ Letters Patent were not amended by the House of Lords Act 1999 owing to the fact that the said Act is a piece of legislation for general application. Your predecessor’s answer put beyond doubt that my peerage and connections with the House of Lords do meet the requirements for a pass to be issued to me forthwith.

I enclose a copy of my letter dated 24th April 2009 to Sir Michael Wilcox KCB, the then Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod, requesting him to renew my pass to the House before it expired at the end of April 2009 [not shown here: Editor].

I felt sorry for Sir Freddie Viggers, the current Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod, [who is] clearly a dignified man of honour, who would not have demeaned himself by signing the letter on 17th June in response to my letter of 24th April unless he had been ordered to do so.

The response was as follows:-

‘I have looked into the renewal of your House of Lords pass and I have discussed this with the Lord Speaker, the usual channels and the Clerk of the Parliaments. I must inform you that it will not be possible to agree your request. Your peerage and connections with this House do not meet the requirements for a pass to be issued, and I am not able to issue a waiver.

I enclose a copy of the said letter. In light of the above and bearing in mind that I have had to wait two months for a totally incorrect and an extremely embarrassing response, I hope you will upon receipt of this letter acknowledge it by return and confirm that you have instructed Sir Freddie Viggers, to issue me with a House of Lords pass within seven days of the date of this letter.

Yours faithfully, Lord Mereworth.

RECAPITULATION OF THE ANALYSIS TO THIS POINT:

(1): The hereditary peers’ Letters Patent were not amended by the House of Lords Act 1999 owing to the fact that the said Act is a piece of legislation for general application.

(2): The withdrawal of the hereditary peers’ passes to enable them to enter the Chamber and so to fulfill their duties as Councillors to the Monarch is therefore unconstitutional, illegal and unlawful.

(3): The consequent destabilisation and variation of the membership composition of the House of Lords is likewise unconstitutional, illegal and unlawful.

(4): The consequence that most hereditary peers are unable in practice to exercise their duties as Councillors to the Crown further represents an unconstitutional, illegal and unlawful deprivation of their rights (and also, let it be added, of their human rights) to serve the Monarch in accordance with their Oath of Allegiance and consequent duties to the Crown.

HOUSE OF LORDS WAS THEN PACKED WITH BLAIR’S CRONIES
Having thrown the constitutional furniture around the room in this barbaric and wanton fashion, the Blair-Brown Revolutionary Government then packed the Upper House with their own cronies, for whom Letters Patent were issued in spades. This behaviour encapsulated the following ironies:

• Having started this destructive revolutionary process, the revolutionary socialists led by the corrupt opportunist criminal Blair and the hardened international socialist Brown then lost their bottle and decided that THEY quite fancied joining the élite themselves one day – making it possible for themselves and their cronies to become Lords and Ladies of the Realm.

In other words, their egos got the better of their sterile ideological preoccupations.

• Having thus abused the Letters Patent system in the manner described above, they accordingly proceeded to abuse it further by issuing new Letters Patent to a bunch of preferred and randomly selected hacks, thereby, contrary to law, discriminating against the Hereditary Peers who retained every right to sit in the Chamber and perform their serious duties as Councillors to The Queen.

[see above].

DEFINITIVE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS BOTCHED REVOLUTIONARY OPERATION
So, what are the consequences of this incredible state of affairs?

Why, as stated above, it means that:

• Every piece of legislation passed by the British Parliament since 2000 IS 100% NULL AND VOID because it was passed though an improperly constituted House of Lords which therefore lacked the power to approve any legislation for sending down to the House of Commons at all.

• Included within the UK legislation which is therefore null and void is the legislation approving the Lisbon Treaty – to which, therefore, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is NOT BOUND and can fully disregard and disavow, for this reason alone.

• Also included within the bogus legislation is the toxic public debt arising from the reckless bail-out ‘Statutes’ enacted in order to rescue Gordon Brown from being sunk without trace due to the media images of long street lines of Northern Rock customers pulling their savings. These ‘laws’, which bind/enslave future generations ad infinitum ARE VACATED, given this state of affairs.

HOW THIS CHAOTIC STATE OF AFFAIRS CAN BE RECTIFIED WITH MINIMAL HASSLE
If the incoming British Government wants to ensure that its future legislation is legitimate, and that it has any purpose at all, it has two alternatives to rectify this chaotic state of affairs:

•EITHER it must table about 900 separate Bills specific to each Hereditary Peer of the Realm and must have these Bills passed by Parliament individually, so that, in the words of Baroness Ashton of Upholland: ‘The effect of Letters Patent creating peerages can he changed by legislation which has that specific effect’. This would have to be done AT ONCE, before passing any other laws.

• OR: On taking power, it must immediately introduce legislation to ABOLISH The House of Lords Act 1999, thereby ‘restoring’ the said unlawfully, unconstitutionally and illegally removed rights and duties of the Hereditary Peers to enable them to perform their duties as Councillors to the Crown as per their Oaths of Allegiance to the British Monarch. (This would NOT render legitimate all the laws published since 2000, which will remain unconstitutional, unlawful and illegal indefinitely).

• If the second, sensible clean-up option is chosen, the Bill to ABOLISH The House of Lords Act 1999 MUST be the FIRST piece of legislation to be introduced: because any legislation introduced into Parliament absent such a Bill to ABOLISH the 1999 Act will be a complete waste of time and resources, as it cannot be lawful under these circumstances. (This would NOT render legitimate all the laws published since 2000, which will remain unconstitutional, unlawful and illegal indefinitely).

• If The Queen’s Speech MAKES NO MENTION OF A BILL TO ABOLISH THE 1999 ACT, you can take it that the next Government intends to operate unconstitutionally, unlawfully and illegally.

• That will mean that, as is the case with ALL LEGISLATION PASSED AT WESTMINSTER SINCE 2000, the legislative activity of the new British Government will be NULL AND VOID, too.

WHY THE REVOLUTIONARIES HAVE SHOT THEMSELVES IN THE FOOT
Two related points in conclusion:

• Charles I was beheaded when he refused to go along with the Will of Parliament – a fact of history of which every subsequent British Monarch has of course been ‘cognisant’.

• On this occasion, Parliament hasn’t disposed of the Monarch in the aforementioned manner; as a direct consequence of which:

• THE SECRET REVOLUTIONARY INTENTIONS OF THE SUBVERSIVE LABOUR GOVERNMENT HAVE BEEN SELF-FRUSTRATED, GIVEN THAT ALL THEIR LEGISLATION SINCE 2000 IS VOID.

‘SCUM OF THE EARTH’, ‘TOO CLEVER BY HALF’
Shortly after the Blair Government was elected in 1997, an extremely sober and respected British analyst remarked to the Editor that the Labour Government that had just come to power consisted of ‘the scum of the earth’. This gentleman is probably the most upright and sober observer known to the Editor – a person of the highest integrity not inclined to fruity language in any way, shape or form. So when he said this, the Editor took careful note. And it turns out that he was ‘right-on’.

But a characteristic of these self-important parasitical revolutionary scum of the earth is that, since their intentions and behaviour are rooted in lies and confusion, they invariably ‘mess up’. They are always ‘too clever by half’, so that they always wind up with a dog’s dinner.

And in respect of what we have reported above, it can be said that they have messed up quite spectacularly, because ALL their convoluted Talmudic legislation – including of course ALL THE TAX LEGISLATION, ALL THEIR BUDGETS – SINCE 2000, ARE DEFINITIVELY NULL AND VOID.

• Well done, Blair and Brown, you prize revolutionary buffoons.

The British people will always be grateful that your sterile arrogance blinded you to what you were doing, and to what you thought you’d got away with.

WITHOUT ABOLITION OF THE 1999 ACT, THE GENERAL ELECTION IS POINTLESS
Corollaries to this chaotic state of affairs, which the corrupt elements of the Establishment and the bureaucracy thought you’d never hear about, include the following:

• Absent one of the alternatives outlined above (900 individual Bills or outright ABOLITION of the 1999 Act), the incoming Parliament will KNOWINGLY, FOLLOWING THIS POSTING, BE ENGAGED IN FRAUDULENT LEGISLATIVE ACTION, deceiving itself, the nation and foreign powers alike.

• THEREFORE, by extension, THE PRESENT ELECTION WOULD BE A WASTE OF TIME AND A FARCE, entailing the election of a Westminster Parliament WITH NO POWERS TO LEGISLATE.

• INTERFERENCE WITH THIS REPORT:

COVERAGE OF THIS REPORT IS STILL BEING ROUTINELY INTERFERED WITH…
The Google count for this report has been varying UP AND DOWN, which means that they were terrified it would go viral. So the NSA was trying to manipulate the situation by depressing the count. This is the routine: Any heavy content that contains very serious issues and threatens to go viral raises a flag on Google’s site counting mechanism. They look at it, then ask NSA about it, NSA says: SPIKE IT. The link count is then depressed. Or a reset/restore mechanism to previous time or config or settings automatically resets the counter(s) back. Here’s a summary of how the link numbers for this report varied over a very short timeframe, CONFIRMING INTERFERENCE, which proves THEY ARE DEAD WORRIED ABOUT THIS REPORT. They think it’s a threat, whereas it’s a straightforward piece of perfectly justified and accurate investigative journalism. Times shown below are UK times. Look at what happened on 13th April and subsequently….

13 April 2010:
14.00 hrs: 749 links
20.00 hrs: 588 links
20.49 hrs: 684 links
21.47 hrs: 524 links
24.00 hrs: 510 links

14 April 2010
12.27 hrs: 655 links
18.16 hrs: 606 links
23.51 hrs: 645 links

15 April 2010
16.17 hrs: 1,710 links
16.18 hrs: 1,710 links
16.38 hrs: 766 links
17.00 hrs: 1,710 links
17.15 hrs: 842 links
17.52 hrs: 1,630 links
19.13 hrs: 1,310 links
19.30 hrs: 2,180 links
19.40 hrs: 1,310 links

16 April 2010
17.50 hrs: 1,950 links
18.10 hrs: 1,090 links
18.24 hrs: 1,090 links

17 April 2010
23.35 hrs: 2,370 links

19 April 2010
10:30 hrs: 3,190 links
12:15 hrs: 3,750 links
17:45 hrs: 3,190 links

20 April 2010
10:30 hrs: 4,750 links
10:40 hrs: 5,090 links
10:50 hrs: 5,060 links
12:50 hrs: 5,100 links
19:25 3,470 links

21 April 2010
01:15 hrs: 4,780 links

22 April 2010:
13:00 hrs: 7,040 links

• Note re this data: Either the Google counter system is completely out of control, or there is massive ongoing censorship interference with this report. Obviously the latter must apply. Note that an advertisment labelled: direct.gov.uk: Directgov: UK Laws: Government Help & Information, has appeared immediately adjacent to the main Google displays of our report. How odd!

• The point is, they can’t expunge Baroness Ashton of Upholland’s statement in the House of Lords from Hansard. So they are desperate to squash this report before it grows legs. It now has more legs than a centipede, so all they can do is keep suppressing the links. Doesn’t work!

• At 7.22 a.m. on 16th April, the Editor received an email from Melbourne, Australia, stating as follows: ‘Just a short message to let you know that some emails sent out that contained the link to your Report about void UK legislation since 2000, have been interfered with’.

• Notes: Applying quotation marks refines the search to the precise report. The fact that attempts were made to ‘flatten’ the links on this basis PROVES that the report was being suppressed. So, they have been caught cutting down the number of links from 749 to 510, and yet it’s still climbing. This proves that Google censors news reports. It does so at the specific behest of the NSA. In this case NSA may have been asked to assist by the UK’s GCHQ.

Without quotation marks you get coverage of the words used, but not necessarily (after the initial findings) in the same order. You wind up with innumerable unconnected items. But even on THAT odd basis, serious fiddling was going on. Specifically, at 01.10 a.m. on 14th April, 99,400 links were shown on that basis. An hour or so later, that aggregate had been squashed to 12,200 links. And by 15.35 p.m. on 14th April, this number had been reduced to 9,680, indicating that Google had in fact removed nearly 100,000 sites using the headline words, but in any order, in a sweep operation to censor this report. So much for the Internet being free of censorship. By 18.16 p.m., the count had risen back to 102,000, accessing the universe of articles using the same words in any order.

• POSTSCRIPT:

WHEN IT TURNS OUT THAT OBAMA IS AN ILLEGITIMATE HOLDER OF THE U.S. PRESIDENCY, ALL BILLS
THAT HE HAS SIGNED INTO LAW SINCE HIS INAUGURATION WILL TURN OUT TO BE NULL AND VOID TOO. VIEWED IN THIS LIGHT, YOU CAN SEE THAT HIS OCCUPATION OF THE WHITE HOUSE IS A REVOLUTIONARY, SUBVERSIVE OPERATION. WELCOME TO THE WORLD REVOLUTION, FOLKS.

• Now we know why the Belgian ‘President of the European Union’ stated on 14th March that ‘2009 was the first year of the World Government’.

• BY WHICH IS MEANT: WORLD GOVERNMENT BY THE IMMUNE CRIMINALS. THE WORLD REVOLUTION HAS ALWAYS BEEN FIRST AND FOREMOST A CRIMINAL OPERATION.

NOTICES:
Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

SECURITISATION IS 100% ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. LEGISLATION

cropped-chrisstory

WHAT THE OFFICIAL RACKETEERS ARE DESPERATELY COVERING UP

Wednesday 10 March 2010 19:30

EAVESDROPPING AND CONSTANT AMERICAN TELEPHONE HARASSMENT
CONFIRM THAT THIS SERVICE IS RIGHT AT THE EPICENTRE OF THIS CRISIS

• REPORTS UPDATE: It has been decided to post this report, containing the ‘securitisation is illegal’ data, which was nearing completion when the fraud discovered on Monday and Tuesday, erupted. Our report on this monumental fraud (which we will call, for shorthand purposes, ‘the Pennsylvania Fraud’), will follow and will probably be alternated with the present analysis. The Editor has now obtained the underlying documentation on the Pennsylvania Fraud, and will be working on this exposure report immediately (so much for his regular publishing work schedule).

• MAJOR UPDATE, 12TH MARCH 2010:

OBAMA, GEITHNER AND THE D.C MEETING ON SECURITISATION
As elaborated below, securitisation in the United States is illegal and contrary to public policy.

All securitised contracts are void not least because they were created to facilitate one or more criminal acts, as explained in this presentation. By definition and US law, all contracts created to accommodate an illegal act are void.

So, what is happening in Washington, DC, ‘as we speak’? Why, a high-level meeting has been taking place to examine how SECURITISATION of FRNs can be used to dig the Obama Administration out of the void it has created by its bovine criminality and stupidity.

The prime movers of this demented, ILLEGAL activity are President Obama and Timothy Geithner, US Treasury Secretary, backed by other purblind officials such as Larry Summers. No doubt the careful timing of the publication of our exposure of securitisation here as completely illegal and contrary to the Rule of Law, will have given the underlings of these perpetrators some concern. Obama’s World Court-granted immunity from prosecution does not extend to domestic felonies.

UNITED KINGDOM: THE LAW OF PROPERTY ACT, 1925
In the United Kingdom, The Law of Property Act, 1925, particularly Section 136 which deals with assignments, makes it crystal clear that alienation by a mortgage provider of all assets that have been assigned without notice having been issued to, or permission granted by, the debtor, is void and fraudulent. Therefore, ALL SECURITISATION OPERATIONS BY FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS WITHIN THE BRITISH JURISDICTION WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN EXPLICITLY SANCTIONED IN ADVANCE BY THE MORTGAGOR, with the mortgagor fully aware of the situation, are void.

Northern Rock and all financial entities engaged in assigning, on-selling, trading and benefiting financially from such activity without notice to or the prior consent of the mortgagor, are engaged in CRIMINAL ACTIVITY. These institutions have accordingly been trading worthless paper between themselves within a fraudulent financial carousel, as repeatedly stated in these reports.

The Directors of these institutions should be investigated and prosecuted by the UK authorities: and if this does not happen, we will keep asking why not. No doubt Lord Myners [see Appendix below], the ‘City Minister’, knows the score perfectly well, and is being ‘economical with the truth’. In which case he is a co-conspirator in this criminality.

The bottom line here is that it is possible in the British jurisdiction to stop anyone who holds a contract for debt (the creditor) from passing that debt to a third party (debt collector) if they have not complied fully with The Law of Property Act 1925 and to hold them to the original contract and, therefore, to their stringent obligations to the debtor under the Consumer Credit Act, 1974. If they do not, the contract is toast and they cannot collect or sue for recovery of the debt. And the debtor is at liberty to counterclaim even if they do sue the debtor: which is another reason why they don’t do this. For this reason, no one talks about the The Law of Property Act, 1925. They will now!

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/ukpga/1925/cukpga_19250020_en_1

136 Legal assignments of things in action:
(1): Any absolute assignment by writing under the hand of the assignor (not purporting to be by
way of charge only) of any debt or other legal thing in action, OF WHICH EXPRESS NOTICE IN WRITING HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE DEBTOR, trustee or other person from whom the assignor would have been entitled to claim such debt or thing in action, is effectual in law (subject to equities having priority over the right of the assignee) to pass and transfer from the date of such notice:
(a) the legal right to such debt or thing in action;
(b) all legal and other remedies for the same; and
(c) the power to give a good discharge for the same without the concurrence of the assignor:

Provided that, if the debtor, trustee or other person liable
in respect of such debt or thing in action has notice:
(a) that the assignment is disputed by the assignor or any person claiming under him; or
(b) of any other opposing or conflicting claims to such debt or thing in action; he may, if he thinks fit, either call upon the persons making claim thereto to interplead concerning the same, or pay the debt or other thing in action into court under the provisions of the Trustee Act, 1925.

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

• UPDATES, 11TH MARCH: The outline report on the Northern Rock case, in which the bank lied in writing to the paid-up mortgagor whose Title Deeds the bank said had been ‘de-materialised’ and held on to for FIVE YEARS AFTER THE MORTGAGE HAD BEEN PAID OFF, and yet finally disgorged after five years (during which time the householder could not sell her home), has triggered much interest. So we have added some new data beneath the outline Northern Rock report below.

• Under US whistleblower legislation, the whistleblower is entitled to a proportion of the fraud uncovered, a point made to the Editor this morning, too. No doubt this will likewise help to focus the serpentine minds of the criminal operatives being exposed. 15% to 30% of $4.2 trillion, plus $6.2 trillion, plus multiple billions, is a lot of dosh. In fact 15% of $10.4 trillion is $1.56 trillion, and 30% is $3.12 trillion. OK, the percentage is usually 10%, applicable only after conviction of course. So make that $1.04 trillion, then. Such awards are naturally available only to US taxpayers: please see the next report, on The Philadelphia Fraud, identified by a US taxpayer.

• LISTENING-IN TO OUR PHONE CALLS GIVES THE GAME AWAY

• WHY DO THEY LISTEN-IN TO EVERY WORD? WE’VE COMMITTED NO CRIMES

• WE’VE BEEN HARASSED DAILY WITH OBSCENE U.S. CALLS SINCE FEBRUARY 2008

• ‘MR STORY IS A PROBLEM FOR THEM BUT THEY CAN HANDLE IT PROVIDED
WHAT HE EXPOSES IS BLOCKED FROM THE ‘MAINSTREAM’’

• AS WE’VE COMMITTED NO CRIMES, AUTHORITIES SHOULD SUPPORT WHAT WE’RE
DOING TO HELP THEM DO THE JOB THEY ARE TOO CORRUPT TO DO UNAIDED

• THEY FALL OVER THEMSELVES TO LISTEN-IN, SO THEY CAN WARN
THE GUTLESS ‘MAINSTREAM’ OUTLETS TO BLOCK OUR EXPOSURES

• ALL THEY DO IS INFORM US BY THEIR SORDID BEHAVIOUR THAT WE ARE RIGHT
‘ON MESSAGE’ – WHICH IS BEYOND STUPID OF THEM, WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT

• CRIMINALISED INTELLIGENCE POWER INCOMPATIBLE WITH SOUND GOVERNANCE

• RACKETEERS CONSTANTLY CONFRONTED WITH THE RULE OF LAW

• COWARDLY CONTROLLED NEWSPAPERS WHICH HAVE IGNORED CIMKM/CMKX

• THE DAILY TELEGRAPH: A CONTROLLED OUTLET FOR MI-6

• MI-6 ‘INTEND TO TAKE MR CHRISTOPHER STORY OUT’

• BRITISH INTELLIGENCE APPEARS TO BE BEHAVING TREACHEROUSLY, AS USUAL

• ‘MAINSTREAM’ NEWSPAPERS REVEALING THEMSELVES
TO BE CO-CONSPIRATORS IN COVERING UP THE RACKETEERING

• WHY CONFINING EXPOSURES TO THIS WEBSITE HAS BEEN
COUNTERPRODUCTIVE FROM THE RACKETEERS’ PERSPECTIVE

• OUR EXPOSURE MODUS OPERANDI: ‘WALKING IN A STRAIGHT LINE’

• QUEEN’S GOLD THEFT STILL NOT RECTIFIED:
SO, KICK THE U.S. AMBASSADOR OUT OF LONDON

• STEALING OF $4.2 TRILLION TAX MONEY ON 31ST DECEMBER 2009
STILL NOT RECTIFIED: SO MASSIVE CRIMES HAVE BEEN COMMITTED

• FISH ROTS FROM THE STINKING HEAD: WORLD COURT IMMUNITY DEMANDED
AND SCANDALOUSLY OBTAINED BY THE COLLECTIVE OF CORRUPT U.S. PRESIDENTS

• GORBACHEV MANIPULATING DEVELOPMENTS FROM HIS WING IN THE KREMLIN, AS BEFORE

• GORBACHEV, BUSH, KOHL, ACKERMANN: RACKETEERING PARTNERS IN DEUTSCHE AG.

• WANTA: THE COURIER BETWEEN BUSH SENIOR AND GORBACHEV

• WANTA’S ‘REAGAN’S JUNK-YARD DOG’ DIVERSION

• WANTA KNEW ABOUT 9/11 IN ADVANCE, LIKE VREELAND

• FRANCE COVERS FOR GERMANY UNDER TREATY OF THE ELYSEE

• FRAUDULENT WANTA ‘SNAKE HILL’ WEBSITE’S GERMAN CONNECTIONS

• CIA/DVD PRACTICE OF EXPLOITING AND STEALING OUTSIDE EXPERTISE

• THE AMERICAN INTELLIGENCE POWER WHICH HAS USURPED
THE GOVERNMENT DANCES TO THE TUNE OF FOREIGN POWERS

• WORLD REVOLUTION RACKETEERING OFFENSIVE

• ‘WALKING IN A STRAIGHT LINE’ WILL EXPOSE THE DECEPTIONS

• COTTRELL THREATENS TO SNATCH AWAY THE RACKETEERS’ COVER,
THROWING THEM INTO A MAD PANIC. THIS WAS NOT ANTICIPATED.

• THE TWO MI-6 OPERATIVES WITH THE QUEEN’S SIGNATURE:
ARE THEY WORKING FOR, OR ARE THEY DOUBLE-CROSSING THE QUEEN?

• WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THE CHINESE CURRENCY BOXES?

• GREEK DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER EQUATES NAZI GERMANY
WITH CHANCELLOR MERKEL’S STASI GERMANY

• WHAT DO THE FOUR RACKETEERS HAVE IN COMMON
WITH OTHER WELL-KNOWN DECEASED AND LIVING OPERATIVES?

• ‘FORECLOSURE ANALYSIS’ PARA-LEGAL SERVICES SPRINGING UP IN THE UNITED STATES

• NORTHERN ROCK’S LIES TO A FORMER MORTGAGOR MASKING
THE FACT THAT HER TITLE DEEDS WERE ‘OTHERWISE ENGAGED’

• SECURITISATION IS A KEY ELEMENT OF A REVOLUTIONARY ATTACK ON PRIVATE PROPERTY

• YES, A RUTHLESS, SYSTEMATIC ATTACK ON PRIVATE PROPERTY

• LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR SCAMS STILL ‘OUT THERE’

• WHY SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. AND COMMON LAW

• SECURITISATION ENTAILS GROSS VIOLATIONS OF R.I.C.O. STATUTES

• NOTWITHSTANDING THAT IT’S ILLEGAL, U.S. AUTHORITIES
CONTINUE TO PROMOTE AND ENCOURAGE SECURITISATION

• SUMMARY FORENSIC ANALYSIS PROVING THE ILLEGALITY OF SECURITISATION

• SECURITISATION: A COVER FOR TAX EVASION

• SECURITISATION VIOLATES THE U.S BANKRUPTCY CODE
AND THEREFORE ALSO CONTRAVENES PUBLIC POLICY

• SECURITISATION VIOLATES FEDERAL R.I.C.O. STATUTES

• SECURITISATION ALSO VIOLATES U.S. ANTITRUST LEGISLATION

• There is also the tenet of English law of contract which governs US law, too, that any contract entered into in order to commit a crime is (automatically) void. So what exactly do the American and British Governments think they are doing ‘accommodating’ securitisation, given this principle?

• THE ‘PHILIPPINES EXCEPTION’ BURIED IN THE CLAYTON ACT

• FANNIE MAE, FREDDIE MAC ENGAGED IN FURTHER ILLEGAL SECURITISATION:
RE-SECURITISING ALREADY SECURITISED ‘DUD’ ASSETS TO DUMP BACK ON THE BANKS

• GARY GENSLER IS NOT AS OPPOSED TO FRAUDULENT FINANCE AS HE SEEMS

• ‘GREATER TRANSPARENCY’ IS EVIDENTLY ALL GENSLER’S AFTER

• INVESTORS’ MONEY USED TO REMUNERATE WALL STREET

•’THE MONEY YOU MAKE BY MISUSING MY MONEY
IS MY MONEY‘ – I.E., THE HOME OWNER’S

• A PERVERSE AND ARROGANT OFFICIAL INTENT TO CONTINUE VIOLATING U.S. LAW

• THE DEPOSITORY TRUST & CLEARING CORPORATION IS IN OVERDRIVE

• THE FEDERAL RESERVE HAS BECOME
THE BACK-STOP GUARANTOR OF CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS

• STAGE SET FOR AN UNIMAGINABLE (AVOIDABLE)
CATASTROPHE: A DEATH-WISH

• THE DTCC’S OBLIGATIONS WAREHOUSE SERVICE

• GREATER TRANSPARENCY WON’T ELIMINATE SYSTEMIC RISK,
OR PREVENT A CONFIDENCE CRISIS

• SO, WHERE ARE YOU, MR HOLDER?

• APPENDIX: LORD MYNERS SAYS THERE MUST BE PENALTIES FOR BANK EXCESSES

• POSTSCRIPT: STIGLITZ: ‘THE AMERICAN BANKING SYSTEM IS CORRUPT’

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

LISTENING-IN TO OUR PHONE CALLS GIVES THE GAME AWAY
If we go back to square one and start asking basic questions about our experiences with these exposures, interesting answers emerge. The first question that arises is this:

• Why is it that so many intelligence eavesdroppers listen to every domestic and especially international telephone call that we make and receive?

After all, the Editor has not stolen any money, has not murdered anyone, has not abducted anyone else’s child, is not a Nazi war criminal, is not engaged in espionage, is not an agent of a foreign power, has not defrauded anyone, and is not engaged in criminal activity in any shape or form. And neither, for instance, is Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., let alone Mr A. Clifton Hodges, the Attorney for the CMKM/CMKX victims, whom the Editor speaks to quite frequently on the transatlantic line.

Is it that these eager eavesdroppers like the sound of the Editor’s voice? Do they seek knowledge from us that they could not obtain from other sources? Are we the fount of all known wisdom in the universe? What do we know and say that others don’t know and can’t say, which these decadent snoopers find so electrifying in our conversations? There must be SOME explanation for their manic preoccupation with what we have to say in our private communications.

WHY DO THEY LISTEN-IN TO EVERY WORD? WE’VE COMMITTED NO CRIMES
Because given that we have committed no crimes, and neither are we patriots terrorists, there HAS to be a coherent reason why these despicable little UK, US and foreign snooping apparatchiks rush to pick up their earpieces every time we begin a conversation – knocking over their plastic coffee cups and making a mess of their work spaces in their frantic anxiety to garner every precious nugget that falls from our lips. One can hear these scum clicking in one after the other.

Oh, the red light’s gone on, we’ve got to record what Story and his correspondents are saying. Why do they need to fall over themselves to find out what we discuss, as we have committed no crimes and are not terrorists?

And why are they routinely engaged in issuing threats against the Editor of this service, and also against Mr Cottrell, and harassing both on a routine basis – Mr Cottrell as recently as 6th March? The Editor, as previously reported, has received daily voicemail messages from a controlled MK-Ultra-style ‘Black’ US DVD nutcase via Skype (Washington, DC) since the Wanta ‘switch’ in February 2008: on some days, we have counted as many as nine such demented harassment calls.

WE’VE BEEN HARASSED DAILY WITH OBSCENE U.S. CALLS SINCE FEBRUARY 2008
These crude harassment calls, which as indicated have been continuing since the Wanta ‘switch’ in 2008, reminiscent of a DVD operation (because of their Bavarian Illuminati-style ‘Black’ content and because Germans never know when to stop, and when they have been defeated) have no effect on the Editor’s work, mind or intentions: yet some ignorant cadre inside the US component of the CIA/DVD revolutionary structures is employed, for money, to continue this illegal harassment.

They seem to think it will wear us down. Instead, the parties being worn down are those who are determined, despite our exposures of their iniquity, to continue their racketeering operations in defiance of the Rule of Law that they despise.

They never thought they would encounter any opposition, and they have been on the wrong foot ever since we stood up to them. Real opposition was never anticipated.

What arrogance! What right do these little malodorous eavesdropping twerps have to intercept our telecommunications and to record what we have to say – sending, we understand, transcripts of our coveted exchanges to the White House?

What right do the National Security Agency, GCHQ, French, Israeli and German intelligence have to listen-in to our phone calls? Are we at the apex of human understanding? Do we dispense pearls of insight and wisdom so penetrating that that these little creeps cannot develop them from other sources? Now let’s broaden our enquiry further, leading in to the next question.

‘MR STORY IS A PROBLEM FOR THEM BUT THEY CAN HANDLE IT PROVIDED
WHAT HE EXPOSES IS BLOCKED FROM THE ‘MAINSTREAM’’
As displayed at the top of our report dated 2nd March 2010, Mr A. Clifton Hodges, Attorney for the 50,000 CMKM/CMKX scamees (whose CMKM stock was exploited when 2.25 trillion PHANTOM SHARES were floated via an illegal platform from WITHIN the Securities and Exchange Commission itself, under the criminal George W. Bush Administration (between June 2004 and October 2005)), was informed by an inside source that ‘Christopher Story is a problem for them, but they think they can handle it PROVIDED that what he exposes does not spill over into the ‘mainstream’ media’ [see our report dated 2nd March 2010].

The source of this information was a US official whose job it is to ENFORCE THE LAW, not to connive in violating it for purposes of expediency.

AS WE’VE COMMITTED NO CRIMES, AUTHORITIES SHOULD SUPPORT WHAT WE’RE
DOING TO HELP THEM DO THE JOB THEY ARE TOO CORRUPT TO DO UNAIDED
One would have thought that since what we are exposing is RAMPANT RACKETEERING AND CRIMINALITY WITHIN THE U.S. GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES, as well as inside the corrupted financial institutions, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the criminal enterprise known as the Central Intelligence Agency, such US operatives and officials would be only too keen on encouraging the broad dissemination of information liable to lead to the indictment and arrest of the racketeers and criminals that are being protected within and close to the Washington Beltway.

But that is not the case! On the contrary, this and other ‘inside’ sources appear to have been engaged in a systematic operation to use Story, Cottrell and now Hodges as a foil and barrier, behind which to plan double-dealing and continued financial deception, and to deceive at least the first two named, in order – as with the original Wanta deception – to preserve a smokescreen as cover for the pursuit of racketeering ‘business as usual’ in general.

The intention here has been to try to conduct the US Dollar Refunding themselves, with FRNs – which will lead very rapidly to a catastrophe, so that the racketeers below the radar can then, so they imagine, unscramble and release their accumulated and worthless nominal ‘derivative’ values from off-balance sheet and offshore sources, for deployment (as is currently happening to some extent) for the Fascist-style purpose of snapping up real assets at firesale prices.

• That’s the goal of the World Revolution.

THEY FALL OVER THEMSELVES TO LISTEN-IN, SO THEY CAN WARN
THE GUTLESS ‘MAINSTREAM’ OUTLETS TO BLOCK OUR EXPOSURES
So, on the one hand, the eavesdroppers knock over their dirty plastic coffee cups as they fall over themselves to listen to and record what we have to say on the telephone; while on the other hand, they appear to be seeing to it that what we have to discuss, and what the Editor is exposing, never reaches beyond the in-house intelligence censorship ‘pods’ sitting inside all press rooms of the controlled ‘mainstream’ media, prompting the next question:

• Why are these manipulators so anxious to hear what we have to say and simultaneously so determined that what we have to say and expose never hits the ‘mainstream’?

After all, given that we have committed no crimes and are not terrorists, and the governments which these despicable little eavesdropping worms serve, supposedly believe in ‘democracy’ and ‘free speech’, don’t you know, it should surely follow that if the eavesdroppers consider that what we have to say is so superb and priceless, their governments would all be awfully keen that our invaluable information and insights should be spread extensively abroad so that the sum of human understanding is enhanced, to the benefit of all, the governments included, n’est-ce-pas?

ALL THEY DO IS INFORM US BY THEIR SORDID BEHAVIOUR THAT WE ARE RIGHT
‘ON MESSAGE’ – WHICH IS BEYOND STUPID OF THEM, WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT
There is of course one benefit to all this – namely, that by listening in to all our telecommunications so routinely and conspicuously, and by engaging in such persistent and futile non-stop telephone harassment (which is recorded by us for future legal reference, not listened to, and zapped), the criminal intelligence cadres concerned are signalling to us LOUD AND CLEAR that we are indeed being highly effective: otherwise they wouldn’t be wasting their time and financial resources in such underhand and counterproductive activities, would they.

So, as we have previously pointed out, these intelligence and masonic cadres are indeed plain STUPID! By their behaviour, they are telling us that we’re being effective, making a difference, and that we’re getting in the way of their racketeering operations by exposing them (as you will see from the next post!). So the confused, panicking fools are telling us all we need to know. It’s neat!

Obviously, there’s something wrong here: and one doesn’t need a first class degree in logic to be able to discern the problem. We haven’t committed any crimes and are not terrorists. Why, then, do these authorities compete among themselves not only to listen to and record what we have to say, but also to prevent the ‘mainstream’ from picking up our insights and assessments?

• ANSWER: Because the governments themselves are engaged in the very financial terrorist criminality and racketeering that we are exposing, and are terrified that the exposures will lead to what from their perspectives might become intolerable ‘unintended consequences’, with rolling outcomes that they couldn’t control. And this is in fact what is going to happen, sooner or later.

CRIMINALISED INTELLIGENCE POWER INCOMPATIBLE WITH SOUND GOVERNANCE
At this point we need to insert an obvious but almost always overlooked anomaly arising from the fact, mentioned in earlier reports, that the coexistence of criminalised, racketeering intelligence powers enjoying carte blanche to embezzle public funds and break the law (and to indulge in petty dirty tricks and bearing false witness such as those involving Gordon Thomas on behalf of MI-6: see Note (1) below), with a system supposedly based on the Rule of Law, is INCOMPATIBLE WITH SOUND GOVERNANCE – let alone with the supposed supremacy of legality.

If they prefer a system without the Rule of Law, why bother any longer with Congress and routinely rigged elections which make a mockery of democracy and just confirm that the US authorities, who hypocritically preach democracy to the Rest of the World, are indistinguishable from corrupt ‘post’-Soviet régimes, where ballot boxes (as in Ireland) are brought pre-stuffed to the polling stations?

Because the criminalised intelligence powers and those serving them:

• Exhibit open contempt for the Rule of Law, but exploit it on an open-ended basis when it suits their own nefarious purposes.

• Seek to avoid leaving traces which would contravene the law when committing their endless crimes, and yet employ every delaying and obfuscation device known to Satan, to save their own skins whenever they perceive they are themselves in danger of the full wrath of legal enforcement.

• Have failed actually to ABOLISH the Rule of Law which they exploit, injure and contravene 24/7 in their pursuit of their ‘Black’ and illegal objectives – which they imagine are ‘allowed’ in the United States thanks to the cover that they assume to be provided under the National Security Act of 1947 et seq. (the criminals’ charter).

RACKETEERS CONSTANTLY CONFRONTED WITH THE RULE OF LAW
This sick mindset was further encouraged in the United States by such ill-advised liberties as President Reagan’s counterproductive Executive Order 12333 of 1981, which catastrophically authorised US intelligence operatives to form corporations of which the operatives themselves could own the shares and which would then ostensibly ‘contract’ with the compartmentalised components of the Intelligence Power and other US agencies to perform tasks required by the Executive Branch, for which the controlling Intelligence Power acts as the clandestine arm.

Obviously, to contract with intelligence operatives who are required by Statute to deny that they are intelligence operatives and therefore to lie for a living, is equivalent to entering into a contract with the fox to guard the chicken house. Significantly, Gorbachëv’s Politburo copied this crass 1981 Reagan formula in 1990.

Therefore, while abusing and contravening the despised Rule of Law, these amoral US officials are constantly being confronted by it. Despite their disdain of the Rule of Law, it stands in their way, and they keep bumping into it, even though they do their best all the time to corrupt it.

This ironical state of affairs provides, of course, another convenient underlying, ongoing dialectic (Thesis, Antithesis) – ripe for exploitation: but in this particular case, the dialectic is a ‘given’, not an artificial construct. In other words, short of an actual criminal dictatorship, there’s not a lot they can do to alleviate their situation here other than to continue compromising, abusing and eroding the Rule of Law, through bribery and corruption.

We have established already that: the criminal governments themselves are engaged in the very racketeering criminality that we are having to expose, given not least that, as reviewed below, ALL SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. AND COMMON LAW – and are terrified that the endless exposures will lead to what, from their perspectives, might become truly intolerable ‘unintended consequences’, with rolling outcomes that they couldn’t control.

COWARDLY CONTROLLED NEWSPAPERS WHICH HAVE IGNORED CIMKM/CMKX
Because of this cowardice on the penetrated governments’ part, the newspapers listed below have been officially prevented, to our own certain updated knowledge [10th March], from reporting even the eminently reportable CMKM/CMKX case, in which payment of $3.87 trillion is demanded from the Securities and Exchange Commission and from certain of its current and former officials, given the unprecedented scandal of the S.E.C. having floated 2.25 trillion PHANTOM SHARES from a platform operated beneath the cover of the Securities and Exchange Commission itself (2).

• Note: Page B1 of the New York Edition of The New York Times dated 12th March carries the first ‘mainstream’ report of the CMKM/CMKX case, twisted to ignore the essence of the case and to suggest, contrary to the truth of the matter, that this is just another instance of the phenomenon that scamees can never admit that they have been scammed. Naturally, one did not expect such a newspaper to report the truth, which can be established from the Complaint [see our report dated 9th January (over two months prior to The New York Times’ article)]. No, the newspaper found a spurious, populist angle which has nothing to do with the substance of the Complaint against the S.E.C., indicating how nervous the US Establishment is over these developments.

Any ‘mainstream’ newspaper that was fulfilling its responsibilities objectively as a conscientious component of the Fourth Estate would have jumped on this story long ago. After all, we published the complete text of the Complaint within hours of it being filed [see our report dated 9th January 2010]. That was TWO MONTHS BACK: and so far, NONE of the ‘mainstream’ US/UK newspapers or broadcast outlets have touched this dynamite. SPECIFICALLY:

• Mr A. Clifton Hodges, Attorney for the 50,000+ CMKM/CMKX scammees, personally informed press contacts about the case, on the following media:

• The Los Angeles Times

• The Washington Post

• The Wall Street Journal

Mr Hodges received no response.

• The Editor of this service personally informed the prominent UK financial journalist Ambrose Evans-Pritchard on The Daily Telegraph, whom he has met in the past. Since The Daily Telegraph’s offices are within walking distance of our Central London office, the Editor offered to deliver a copy of the actual Summons and Complaint by hand last week.

• The Editor did not even receive the courtesy of an acknowledgment of his emails.

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH: A CONTROLLED OUTLET FOR MI-6
Notwithstanding his duplicitous behaviour in acting as an agent for MI-6 in bearing false witness against the Editor of this service in 2004, Gordon Thomas is persona grata at The Daily Telegraph, and recently published a large article in that paper on the subject of the use of British passports by Israel assassination operatives. As the Editor’s case shows, Thomas also acts as an agent for MI-6.

Therefore, The Daily Telegraph is under the thumb of MI-6, which helps to explain quite why this newspaper – which used to publish extensive op-ed. articles by the Editor of this service in the 1970s and early 1960s, until the takeover by the since disgraced and jailed corrupt globalist felon Conrad Black – has failed so far in its duty as a key member of the Fourth Estate to report (a) the biggest official corruption case to come to Court in world history and (b) the biggest and most-far-reaching exposure of government and financial institution racketeering since the world began.

MI-6 ‘INTEND TO TAKE MR CHRISTOPHER STORY OUT’
At about 10.45pm on Sunday 7th March, the Editor was informed via a transatlantic phone call that the Editor’s correspondent had been informed by an ‘inside’ source directly connected with MI-9 (MI-6) that ‘MI-6 intend to ‘take Mr Story out’’. Apparently the intention was or is to prepare one or more ‘stings’ and traps, in the hope that the Editor will fall into them, as happened once or twice before (given that, since these people only ‘do’ deception, it is almost impossible to avoid being deceived at some stage: except that the longer they drag out their cynical games, the easier it becomes to read their criminal minds and the unchanging techniques they use (the devil isn’t a great inventor)): so the deeper the discernment one eventually acquires, and the less chance do they have of pulling off a targeted dirty trick, as intended.

The Editor enquired why this evil intent should have surfaced at this late stage in the racketeering exposure proceedings: to which the answer was: ‘They want to move on by fixing things below the radar, they are furious that you have so much information, and they want to make sure you don’t publicise the outcome, especially concerning the Dollar Refunding which they have resisted so hard, when it happens’. To which the Editor responded words to the following effect: ‘Well, a gentleman’s word is his bond. They can walk across the bridge and ring our office doorbell’.

‘They wouldn’t do that. They’d sting you instead’.

Quite right: they can’t do that now, as they have squandered so many resources trying to entrap and trip the Editor up, that a ‘gentlemanly approach’ wouldn’t work now. It would probably have worked back in 2002: but not now. If you have been deceived and abused already by your own (let alone the hideous, criminalised American) intelligence services, you aren’t likely to succumb to such a ‘gentlemanly approach’. They burned their boats.

• Not very clever: but then again, as we’ve seen, these people are extraordinarily STUPID.

BRITISH INTELLIGENCE APPEARS TO BE BEHAVING TREACHEROUSLY, AS USUAL
Anyway, thanks for the heads-up – reiterated, by the way, by the faux-demented DVD ‘Black’ Psy-Ops voice who’s being paid to plague us daily since the completion of the Leo Wanta ‘switch’ in February 2008 (as revisited briefly above). So, what we have is the following devilish equation:

(1): The Editor of this service is a patriotic supporter of the nation state, is exactly what he says he is and has been for decades [see our testimonials], is viscerally opposed to the pagan, decadent, debauched World Revolution and its filthy ‘Black’ social and geopolitical detritus which is such a menace to civilisation, is a loyal subject of Her Majesty the Queen (with no other such connections whatsoever), believes (whether you like it or not) that Jesus Christ is the Lord, and is come in the flesh, and has stood up forcefully (because we have no choice, not because of any courage) to the abominations, abuses, verbal abuse and agitprop tirades, betrayals, successive threats (including seven death threats), innumerable lies and attempted ‘stings’, and the cynical exploitation by Mr Wanta of the Editor’s integrity and expertise; and has nevertheless sought to expose elements of the officially perpetrated and condoned racketeering and embezzlement of US taxpayers’ funds, and the myriad other Fraudulent Finance atrocities perpetrated with impunity under five self-acknowledged criminal Presidents of the United States.

(2): In exchange for which, conniving British intelligence cadres, according to the US ‘insider’ source whose identity is known to the Editor, are actively seeking ‘as we speak’ to ‘take Story out’ and to try, once again – à la Gordon Thomas – to discredit him.

This is to be the Editor’s reward for the serial abuse, deceit, lies, attempted ‘stings’, deceptions and other pathetic, underhand travesties, that the Editor has suffered in recent years in exposing these crimes. And these abuses, by the way, are AS NOTHING compared to what others, especially Michael C. Cottrell, have suffered at the hands of these serial thieves, racketeers and reprobate operatives over a much longer period of time.

• The Editor personally sent emails last week giving details of the CMKM/CMKX case to 14 well-known newspapers in India, Pakistan, China, Hong Kong, Malaysia and The Philippines, with the coordinates of Mr Hodges so that their journalists could check everything with the source. At the time of this posting, there had been no response.

‘MAINSTREAM’ NEWSPAPERS REVEALING THEMSELVES
TO BE CO-CONSPIRATORS IN COVERING UP THE RACKETEERING
None of this surprises us, given the above, nor does it even suggest that the Dark Forces are not in the process of being defeated. On the contrary, by cow-towing to their criminalised governments and intelligence communities, these newspapers are just allowing themselves to be tarred with the same Black Racketeering Brush that has covered the known official and financial criminalists with sticky black gunge that runs down into the sewer.

All that these media outlets are doing by ignoring these investigations is to confirm that they, too, are parties to, minded to be in favour of, and doubtless in many cases participants in, the familiar Fraudulent Finance racketeering practices that the perpetrators are trying in vain to cover up. In some US cases (known to this service), key media outlets are recipients of giant bribes paid out specifically in order to prevent them from covering these investigations.

We haven’t yet revealed the identities of the US news media concerned; but if there exists such a phenomenon as an honest journalist working for any of them, we would remind such persons of the basic reality that the bribee is actually in a stronger position than the distributor of the bribe – who won’t want to be exposed.

His bribe is presumably held in place by threats of lethal consequences, or blackmail: but these implied or actual threats are usually empty and cannot be fulfilled without entangling the source of the bribe in a cauldron of problems arising from his iniquity that he would wish to avoid.

WHY CONFINING EXPOSURES TO THIS WEBSITE HAS BEEN
COUNTERPRODUCTIVE FROM THE RACKETEERS’ PERSPECTIVE
And by adopting the strategy of trying to confine these exposures of official and financial sector racketeering to this website (even though some indications of broader coverage, with which we are associated, are ‘in the pipeline’), the US cover-up cadres have managed (counterproductively, from their disoriented perspective) to contrive that a reasonably consistent corpus of information has emerged into the public domain, as well as being captured for posterity and current research in successive issues of International Currency Review, which has official, central bank, institutional and library subscribers throughout the world – thereby precluding any possibility of the heirs of the perpetrators rewriting history so as to ‘airbrush’ this financial racketeering out of the record.

OUR EXPOSURE MODUS OPERANDI: ‘WALKING IN A STRAIGHT LINE’
Proceeding now to our modus operandi, we reiterate that our method is the straightforward one of ‘walking in a straight line’. Unlike your agents of influence and disinformation outlets – including notorious website peddlers of ‘Black Propaganda’, lies and confusion operating under Intelligence Power instructions to maximise the potential of the ‘Black’ fog of disinformation for the purpose of covering up the racketeering – our method, having done our due diligence to the extent possible, is to publish what we have learned either directly or else covered by a necessary ‘to the best of our knowledge and belief’ caution.

When we obtain information which can only be forthcoming from ‘inside’ and, very often, from dissident and double-crossed intelligence sources (because these people are always bitterly at loggerheads internally), we may publish such information ‘straight’ with no qualifications at all.

An example of this was our revelation that the late former Governor of the Bank of England, Lord ‘Eddie’ George, had been arrested and briefly jailed in July 2007. We have only recently learned, and publicised, WHY Lord George was arrested.

Lord George was seized because of his rôle in aiding, abetting and facilitating, with the criminal operative Dr Alan Greenspan, the stealing/diversion of The Queen’s gold on 29th-30th March 2007, as we reported six weeks or so later. Lord George, who died in April 2009, was instrumental in exchanging the gold for worthless pieces of ‘derivatives’ paper.

QUEEN’S GOLD THEFT STILL NOT RECTIFIED:
SO, KICK THE U.S. AMBASSADOR OUT OF LONDON
That operation represented the Bush-CIA-DVD’s biggest theft ever; AND IT STILL HASN’T BEEN RECTIFIED. If UK Governments consisted of people with conviction, knowledge and backbone, instead of the usual blackmailed, compromised and controlled psychological cases with dirty intelligence backgrounds, the American Ambassador should be ordered out of Britain, with his Embassy peremptorily closed sine die – until such time as this unspeakable assault has been resolved. When we mentioned this demand, which we first made in the summer of 2007, to a US contact, she said: ‘That’s precisely what the pan-Germans and the covert Soviets want’.

• To which our response is: SO WHAT?

If Lord George had even contemplated instructing his solicitors to try to obtain a retraction from us, he would immediately have been told advised nothing could be done because Christopher Story’s information was accurate (even though it was obtained from secret sources), and that Lord George couldn’t know what back-up information Mr Story held in support of his revelations.

In any case, to challenge such a report would certainly have embroiled the former Governor of the Bank of England in a dangerous encounter. Far better to assume that the sensational report would remain ‘buried’ in International Currency Review, and also covered by the Gordon Thomas MI-6 ‘blanket false witness’ lies about the Editor to the gullible so-called ‘mainstream’ media.

STEALING OF $4.2 TRILLION TAX MONEY ON 31ST DECEMBER 2009
STILL NOT RECTIFIED: SO MASSIVE CRIMES HAVE BEEN COMMITTED
Likewise, when we reported that the tax on the Settlements monies had indeed been subtracted effective 31st December 2009, we had obtained hard information to that effect, backing up ‘inside’ information provided via impeccably reliable sources. Specifically, we received an email at 20:24 UK time, on 1st January 2010, from a key figure involved in the Settlements (said by key US ‘inside’ sources, who may have been lying to our contacts, to be briefed to pay off corrupt US politicians) who was in almost daily contact with us by email under a pseudonym for over two and a half years, stating that: ‘sources here [in Dallas] and in Europe told me my taxes were taken off the top on or before 12/31 in order for them to be credited into Fiscal 2009. I got that word Wednesday 12/30/09’.

Since these taxes have not been restored to the Settlements funds which had not been paid out by the 45-day deadline of 14th February (by which date the funds from which the taxes had been taken should by law have been remitted):

• WHERE IS THAT TAX MONEY?

• WAS IT STOLEN AND IF SO, WHO STOLE IT, MR GEITHNER?

• WAS IT PLACED OUT ON CONTRACT, after $100 billion had been siphoned off into the hands of a well-known US false religion as we have reported, and if so, who is or was the foreign corrupt counterparty? Brazil? Zimbabwe? Denmark? Deutsche Bank, Frankfurt?

China Trust Bank? Barclays Bank?

• WHO are the foreign counterparties that have collaborated with the criminals in the White House, the US Treasury, the State Department and the CIA to STEAL over $4.0 trillion from the account of the US taxpayer, and imagine that there will be no ‘consequences’?

Of course, the problem that the official racketeers faced was that the tax accruals ‘could not be placed into the taxpayers’ accounts’ – because, suddenly, the $4.5 trillions squandered by the current reckless Obama Government would have been restored overnight – raising questions about SOURCE OF FUNDS. Ah, so THAT’s why there’s been a blackout across the board of these exposures and investigations, is it? Well, no: as will be shown, it’s much worse than that.

• They couldn’t pay the tax monies into the taxpayers’ accounts: so they just STOLE IT, which was what they always intended to do, anyway.

• Keep asking yourself basic questions like: WOULD THEY STEAL IT? THE ANSWER TO SUCH BASIC QUESTIONS CONCERNING THESE DESPERATE CRIMINALS IS: SURE. NATURLICH.

As can be seen from Mr Hodges’ letter to the Office of the New York State Attorney General [see our report dated 2nd March 2010], we know [and in any case, see above] that these tax monies were not ‘replaced’ back into the Settlements pool – as a consequence of which the perpetrators now face extremely severe criminal sanctions, as Mr Hodges has pointed out to Andrew Cuomo’s office when demanding an investigation, given that some of the main perpetrators, and many of his own client CMKM/CMKX victims (whose monies appear to be tied up with the Settlements funds) are resident in the State of New York [See Note 3].

How is it possible that this grievous official criminality and blatant racketeering has continued, notwithstanding these exposures (albeit in the context of the complicit and cowardly failure of the Fourth Estate to do its job properly)?

FISH ROTS FROM THE STINKING HEAD: WORLD COURT IMMUNITY DEMANDED
AND SCANDALOUSLY OBTAINED BY THE COLLECTIVE OF CORRUPT U.S. PRESIDENTS
The starting point here will be to remind you that FISH ROTS FROM THE HEAD and that we have reported that in or around September 2009, five US Presidents – Carter (39), Bush Senior (41), Clinton (42), Bush Junior (43) and Obama (44) DEMANDED IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION from the World Court. This immunity was, we were told, GRANTED – in a disgraceful abuse of power by the World Court, which appears to have caved in to Mr Obama’s DEMAND on behalf of himself and his four criminal predecessors.

As we can see from this episode, President Obama has been in lock-step with these four criminal predecessors – which eliminates all residual (courtesy) expectations that he might have had the guts to stand up to these racketeers. That would, however, have been impossible – since this operative, whatever his background, is of course a placeman and a puppet of the controlling criminalised US Intelligence Power.

We can thus state without fear of contradiction on the basis of the foregoing information that the five US Presidents openly acknowledge that THEY ARE CRIMINALS. If you are not a criminal, you do not need immunity from prosecution. These operatives, working together as a PRESIDENTIAL COLLECTIVE, demanded and received the immunity from prosecution that they sought.

That of course means that the World Court which sustains the figleaf of legality at the corrupted intergovernmental level (where in fact the Rule of Law does not operate properly or at all, or can be non-existent) is COMPLICIT IN LETTING ALL THESE CRIMINALS OFF THE HOOK – in other words, condones criminality at the highest level, irrespective of the consequences (which in this context includes destroying the lives, savings, hopes and physical assets of hundreds of thousands and probably millions of victims).

In translation, the World Court appears to regard its job as DEFENDING RACKETEERS IN HIGH PLACES – not to sustain the Rule of Law at the intergovernmental level without fear or favour.

GORBACHEV MANIPULATING DEVELOPMENTS FROM HIS WING IN THE KREMLIN. AS BEFORE
Behind this scandal of scandals, lies the deeper reality which we have publicised but which none of the ‘mainstream’ media has picked up on, and which, we are informed, is now of ‘no interest’ to the present generation. We refer to the PROVEN FACT that former President Mikhail Gorbachëv, who fronted ‘collapsible Communism’ for the benefit of the confused ‘mainstream media’ and strutted the stage for years thereafter (and indeed continues to do so, to this day), collaborated AND STILL COLLABORATES with the Black Godfather of the criminally penetrated US Intelligence Power, the Langley base of which is labelled the George Bush Center for Intelligence.

GORBACHEV, BUSH, KOHL, ACKERMANN: RACKETEERING PARTNERS IN DEUTSCHE AG.
Specifically, as we have exclusively reported, Gorbachëv is a partner with George H. W. Bush Sr. and Dr Helmut Kohl, the former Chancellor of Germany, together with Dr Joseph Ackermann, in Deutsche AG., formerly Barrington Investment Group, St. Gallen, Switzerland, which handles the illegal proceeds of racketeering operations – as was the case with the proceeds derived from the stealing of a contract belonging to Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., and which was facilitated by the ‘electronic stealing and forging’ of Mr Cottrell’s signature. The background detail to these crimes is re-presented herewith:

• Former President Mikhail S. Gorbachev, working with former US President George H. W. Bush Sr., former German Chancellor Dr Helmut Kohl and Dr Joseph Ackermann, all partners in Deutsche AG (formerly Barrington Investment Group), Switzerland, stole a contract using the electronic tag to the securities account owned by Mr Michael C. Cottrell’s Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., with Benchmark Securities, Inc., New Jersey, at a table-top meeting in Geneva on 7th October 2002 by the means described below, which included the electronic ‘forging’ of Mr Cottrell’s signature.

This theft was preceded by seven related thefts from Mr Cottrell’s firm’s securities account.

• This means that former President Mikhail Gorbachev and former German Chancellor Helmut Kohl are financial criminals like George H. B. Bush Sr., and should be treated accordingly.

Mr Gorbachev and Helmut Kohl have, as partners in Deutsche AG, by definition been profiting from the theft of Mr Cottrell’s contract and property, and also from huge proceeds from the theft of The Queen’s gold, which, we were specifically informed at 1.15 am by telephone on 4th February 2010, have likewise been channelled through Deutsche AG, St Gallen, Switzerland.

• As of 10th March 2010, The Queen’s gold had not been restored.

• The proceeds of innumerable corrupt transactions involving Gorbachëv, Bush Sr., Kohl and Ackermann have been run through the DVD’s main institutions, Deutsche Bank and Dresdner Bank.
So what is being exposed is that George H. W. Bush Sr. (CIA/DVD) and Mikhail Gorbachev (Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) and KGB/FSB) have been systematically ransacking American and non-American victims alike, and running this colossal open-ended racketeering through Germany, with the assistance of the former STASI of East Germany (who are GESTAPO in relabelled clothing).

Hence the presence on the scene of STASI operatives such as Eva Teleki, a (separate) ‘Swedish’ opera singer, and other dirty operatives suspected of being continuing STASI agents, such as Chancellor Angela Merkel (the former Secretary of the Agitation and Propaganda Department of the Young Communists at Marx Lenin University, in East Berlin). This explains why Merkel was earlier fingered by this service as the guardian in Germany of George H W Bush Sr.’s stolen and exploited racketeering assets with German institutions.

• Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin (Shalomov), who is a senior Soviet GRU operative, was based in East Germany before he migrated to Leningrad, and is believed to have been primarily responsible for orchestrating, at least from the Soviet side, the clockwork ‘collapsible Communism’ operations in Eastern Europe. Gorbachev has been reported to us to operate from a wing of the Kremlin, as though he never left the place.

• Which he didn’t. He’s been at the centre of this revolutionary criminality THROUGHOUT.

WANTA: THE COURIER BETWEEN BUSH SENIOR AND GORBACHEV
Reconsider now the unsavoury, treacherous rôle of Mr Leo/Lee Wanta in this context. As we have repeatedly shown [see our reports dated 20th September 2009, 22nd October 2009, 17th November 2009 and 29th January 2010 for instance], Wanta’s ‘Principality of Snake Hill’ cover, which provides him with a fraudulent virtual ‘Ambassadorship’ from the non-existent ‘Principality of Snake Hill’ to the United States ‘enabling’ him to continue using the false self-designation ‘Ambassador’, is the clumsy concoction of an undischarged felon who has stolen inter alia this Editor’s $35,000 loan plus interest and other monies, cannot own a bank account because he is a felon, and not only answers the telephone in German with ‘GUTEN TAG’, but spells telephone TELEFON, Groupe with an ‘e’ as in French, while also masquerading behind this false front using a 202 telephone number provided by the French Embassy in Washington, DC.

Thus AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc, with ‘Groupe’ spelt as in French, was a French/DVD operation set up with the assistance of the former French Ambassador to Washington, DC, Monsieur Levitte, now President Sarkozy’s top intelligence advisor – its purpose being to steal/divert funds on behalf of the Bush-CIA-DVD racketeers for which the bilateral treaty-bound Vichy-French authorities, being complicit with the pan-Germans in this corruption (think of the 3,000+ Bush-linked accounts with Paribas in Paris), provide permanent cover.

No wonder Wanta, who had operated out of Vienna in the late 1980s and early 1990s, had to sack Michael Cottrell as Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. (which he did ‘illegally’ on 23rd March 2008: see website reports) when it became obvious that Cottrell and Story were hot on the trail of this devious foreign operation to steal vast funds belonging to the United States of America and its taxpayers. Against this background, please be reminded [see our report dated the 20th September 2009] that Wanta’s nauseating ‘excess patriotism’ and ‘apple-pie Americanism’ is ALL FAKE – part of his elaborate but now exposed cover, as is his false religiosity. Recall Story’s Third Law: ‘Sooner or later all operations and covers are BLOWN’.

WANTA’S ‘REAGAN’S JUNK-YARD DOG’ DIVERSION
Wanta told Claire Sterling, the late author of Thieves’ World [published by the CIA’s favourite book publisher, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1994], and also reconfirmed personally to the Editor of this service, that President Reagan used to refer to Wanta as his ‘junkyard dog’.

He told the Editor that George Bush Sr. was ‘never in the room when Ronald Reagan briefed me’. This statement conflicts with the reality, which has been emphatically reconfirmed to this Editor from ‘inside’ sources, that Wanta was indeed the courier between George Bush Senior and Mikhail Gorbachëv (who are, as indicated, joint partners with Dr Helmut Kohl and Dr Joseph Ackermann in Barrington Investment Group, now Deutsche AG, St Gallen, Switzerland: see above etc.).

So it transpires that Wanta systematically lies and lied to his contacts, including the Editor of this service, whose platform and expertise he exploited to provide a smokescreen behind which the Bush-CIA-DVD racketeers, which Wanta served, could continue unimpeded under the crook Henry M. Paulson’s supervision from the US Treasury.

• We did wonder why we encountered no interference from the highest US level for the first year while Wanta was using us in the manner described.

WANTA KNEW ABOUT 9/11 IN ADVANCE, LIKE VREELAND
Wanta was released from jail just over a week after 9/11, was collected from prison by Gerald Salchert, of Austrian extraction, and taken to a relative’s house in Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin. Because of his experiences at the hands of the Bush-Clinton Crime Syndicate (given that these mentally deranged capos always treat their underlings with cruelty), there was concern that his prior knowledge of the 9/11 abomination might be leaked prior to the event – which is in fact what the Office of Naval Intelligence and prospective/actual assassin, Lt. Mark Delmart Vreeland, did from jail in Toronto, after he had opened three diplomatic bags, which is treason.

In March 2005, the Pentagon-associated US operative nicknamed ‘The Visitor’, calling himself Walker whose real name is Demchuk, who pestered the Editor for information about the Soviet-originated Iraqi WMD-removal (‘Sarindar’) programme, informed the Editor that ‘Vreeland is in solitary confinement for a very long time, his case has been sealed and he is no longer a threat to you’ (Vreeland having threatened the Editor with death in 2003). Vreeland’s parole board meeting has been pencilled in for a date in 2163, according to an informed US source.

FRANCE COVERS FOR GERMANY UNDER TREATY OF THE ELYSEE
Under the Treaty of the Elysée dated January 1963, which is of indefinite duration, France and Germany are both required to coordinate their stances on all external matters, on which they are required to ‘reach an analogous position’. France is therefore indistinguishable from Germany in respect of international strategic deception operations (especially as there are special intelligence collaboration provisions under the Treaty), and accordingly fronts extensively for Germany.

In this particular context, it provides flimsy (and disintegrating, or disintegrated) cover for the Abwehr operative, Leo Wanta, who was indeed the courier between George H. W. Bush Sr. and Mikhail Gorbachev [see our report dated 4th February 2010]. Although he says he’s Polish, we think this felon and fraudster may be a DVD operative/double agent, possibly STASI.

The German Chancellor, Angela Merkel – formerly the Secretary of the Agitation and Propaganda Department of the Communist Yugend at Marx-Lenin University, East Berlin – is a STASI operative.

FRAUDULENT WANTA ‘SNAKE HILL’ WEBSITE’S GERMAN CONNECTIONS
Further research has revealed a direct German connection with the clumsy ‘Principality of Snake Hill’ deception, which we have demolished, not least with the imprimatur of Ms Brenda Farrell, an official at the Australian Embassy in Dublin, who replied to our Irish associate’s enquiry as follows:

Forwarded message
From: <richardsharpe@eircom.net>
Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:25 PM
Subject: Fwd: Principality of Snake Hill [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
To: mrrichardsharpe <mrrichardsharpe@gmail.com>

richardsharpe@eircom.net wrote:
Many thanks for your timely response.

Regards
Richard

“Austremb Dublin” <Austremb.Dublin@dfat.gov.au> wrote:

Dear Mr Sharpe,

Thank you for your email.

There is no principality in Australia.

Kind regards

Australian Embassy
Dublin
Tel: +353 (0) 1 664 5300
Fax: +353 (0) 1 678 5185

richardsharpe@eircom.net

The German connection exposed herewith below, reveals the low calibre of these operatives, whose arrogance and certainty that they will never be exposed, is such that they don’t put much expertise into their deception operations if they can help it. A sane person would have thought that in ‘designing’ the ‘Principality of Snake Hill’ deception, they would have used some common sense and established an actual domain name, rather than using freeware sites.

One of the ‘Snake Hill’ websites
[http://members.multimania.co.uk/snakehill/]
causes computers to display a warning [viewable at: http://safeweb.norton.com/report/show?url=multimania.co.uk].

That warning is really for the entire ‘Multimania.co.uk’ domain, not just the fake ‘/snakehill’ subset. But it is interesting, to put it mildly, to note that the website’s location is: GERMANY. Why would a GERMAN site use a United Kingdom domain identifier?

• ESPECIALLY on a site noted for hosting THOUSANDS of Trojan threats: except that the answer presents itself immediately: it’s a DVD operation.

Yes, the entire website is HOSTED IN GERMANY, so Wanta’s ‘/snakehill’ subdirectory on this domain absolutely emanates from GERMANY as well. The following is the actual Whois Internet registration data (fully available at http://who.is/whois/multimania.co.uk/):

IP: 213.131.252.254
IP Location: Dusseldorf*, Germany

*Note: Wanta’s lawyer, Steve Goodwin, was born in Dusseldorf.

Domain name: multimania.co.uk

Registrant: conversis GmbH

Registrant type: Unknown

Registrant’s address: Patrick Kirchhoff, Erftstrasse 11, Duisburg 47051, Germany

Registrar: InterNetWire Communications GmbH [Tag = INTERNETWIRE-DE]
URL: http://www.internetwire.de

Relevant dates: Registered on: 12-Feb-2009
Renewal date: 12-Feb-2011
Last updated: 23-Apr-2009

Registration status: Registered until renewal date.

Name servers: ns1.conversis.de; ns2.conversis.de

WHOIS lookup made at 02:44:25 27-Feb-2010

As you can now start to see, our original assessment that the United States and Britain are in thrall to the GERMAN enemy that they never defeated, which we have maintained without deviation ever since those ‘gasps’ emitted by eavesdroppers during a telephone call several years ago made by the Editor to Wanta (joined by his former lawyer, Thomas Henry or Heinrich, a.k.a. Mr ‘Nasty’) is being confirmed by more and more evidence that is accumulating all the time.

In addition to using the French as a convenient, permanent front for their continuing hegemony operations, the pan-German Nazi long-range strategic deception heirs of the Abwehr, Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD), collaborate with the covert Soviets (Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU), and the KGB/FSB, in formulating, implementing and consolidating their comprehensive, failing revolutionary hegemony operations against the Main Enemy (Britain and the United States).

• That’s quite easy, since the heirs of the Abwehr and of Heinrich Himmler OWN THE CIA.

CIA/DVD PRACTICE OF EXPLOITING AND STEALING OUTSIDE EXPERTISE
Now it is standard CIA ‘tradecraft’ practice to usurp the expertise of outside professional talent if it is not available in-house or by some other means. In this context, the CIA perpetrators needed a US securities expert with impeccable credentials and a securities account. What the CIA does is apply its standard Bush-style ‘bait and switch’ technique, exploiting and maximising the potential of the usurped professional expertise, before rejecting it and stealing the assets associated with it.

Note that Wanta likewise used this Editor’s website and publishing platform in pursuing his own agendas for 15 months, telling Mr Cottrell in October 2007 that ‘we must get rid of Chris Story, but don’t tell him’. Mr Cottrell having formed his own view of Wanta’s unreliability, Teutonic arrogance and duplicity, carefully found a way to warn the Editor of this ‘switch’ in December 2007, without actually revealing what he could not then reveal.

In March 2008, Wanta fired Cottrell by issuing a vituperative three-page ‘Resolution of the Sole Shareholder’ (which is illegal, as corporate resolutions can only legally be issued by the Board at a Board Meeting: the text of this document used language familiar to the Editor of this service as having been written by Thomas Henry (‘Mr Nasty’)).

Relieved, Mr Cottrell then despatched the necessary resignation information to the tax authorities in Richmond, VA, requesting them to send all subsequent paperwork, including tax demands, to Wanta in Wisconsin – where he had long stated that he is not resident and does not run a business. The rest of this sequence can be gleaned from our website: see March 2008.

So what the cynical Intelligence Power routinely does is ‘borrow’ external expertise, before discarding or stealing it. In the Editor’s case, ‘bait and switch’ has worked both ways: it could be argued that we ourselves have done a ‘switch’, taking a leaf out of these deceivers’ book.

Meanwhile, the same happened to Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. Because the standard CIA procedure of exploiting, then stealing and discarding outside expertise and assets, also explains Wanta’s ‘use’ of Mr Cottrell for his failed AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. DVD stealing operation – because Michael C. Cottrell has the requisite securities market expertise and securities account facilities, which were (mistakenly) applied for the benefit of Mr Wanta’s AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. (but which cannot be used without Mr Cottrell’s signature: so we shall see whether it has again been stolen).

[Note: This analysis was written BEFORE the incredible fraud perpetrated via the State of Pennsylvania, subject of our separate report, was known. Quite prophetic, you may think].

Note also that Steven Goodwin, the Wanta Attorney in Richmond, VA, who accepted this Editor’s $35,000, which Wanta stole, was born, as stated previously, in Dusseldorf. Goodwin wrote the shifty loan documents which Leo Wanta demanded that the Editor sign forthwith, as soon as the Editor arrived on 10th June 2005 at his relative’s address in Chippewa Falls.

Wanta took it for granted that the Editor would meet his preremptory demand to sign, and wouldn’t walk out on the spot (which he nearly did).

[INSERTION: The Editor received an email on 9th March from a US correspondent who said he had asked Mr Wanta why he hadn’t paid the Editor’s loan plus interest back on the due date (or at all). Wanta replied that Mr Story had been ‘offered’ the choice of a ‘Biblical’ payment of ten times the orginal loan (no such ‘Biblical norm exists, by the way), or payment of the amount due on the due date. This is a fabrication. No such choice was ever offered: in any case it contains what is known as an ‘illusory promise’: see the securitisation analysis below. Another Wanta fabrication/slither].

THE AMERICAN INTELLIGENCE POWER WHICH HAS USURPED
THE GOVERNMENT DANCES TO THE TUNE OF FOREIGN POWERS
As for the stealing of Mr Cottrell’s contract and the electronic forging of his signature – a specific case of which we have detailed information [see above], which proves the ongoing racketeering collaboration between Bush, Gorbachëv and Kohl from the outset – it has been shown not only that Gorbachëv, Bush Sr., Helmut Kohl and Ackermann are handling stolen accruals (4) (the money that you make from stealing my money, is my money), but also that the US Intelligence Power dances to the tune of the foreign power whom George H. W. Bush represents, namely Germany – whom the Allies were supposed to have defeated in 1945.

Working closely at the intelligence level with the Nazi Continuum is the covert Soviet Continuum – both of which ‘Black’ Revolutionary Forces went underground: the Nazi (pan-German) Continuum went underground well before the defeat of Hitler, and the Soviet Continuum went underground in 1991, remaining under the supervision of ‘former’ President Gorbachëv, who, as indicated above, occupies a large suite of offices inside the Kremlin to this day.

As the Editor of Soviet Analyst, this Editor believes that GORBACHEV calls the shots – as he did from the moment this former Secretary of the CPSU Administrative Department came to power after the ‘festival of three funerals’ of abruptly deceased (murdered) Soviet leaders, in 1985.

We also believe that the concerted offensive to ‘take down’ the ‘Main Enemy’ (Britain and the United States) is the TWIN operation following on from the ‘takedown’ of the Soviet Union – and furthermore, that this massive operation is perpetrated by THE SAME TOP THREE OPERATIVES who ransacked the USSR: Gorbachëv, Bush Senior and Helmut Kohl.

WORLD REVOLUTION RACKETEERING OFFENSIVE
In other words, what we are exposing is a colossal World Revolution programme, from which these three racketeers and handlers of stolen monies have benefited and continue to benefit personally. [Well, they can’t be expected to run the World Revolution for altruistic motives, can they].

The extent to which Metabridge (Mossad, DVD, CIA and MI-6) is implicated in this gigantic anti-nation state World Revolution operation will quite probably be exposed when it transpires whether or not the two high-level MI-6 officers in the United States who were reported to us to be holding The Queen’s signature authority for the Settlements and her hijacked loan funds, may be double-crossing the Monarch. Given that everyone appears to have been double-crossing everyone else, anything is possible and nothing can be taken for granted: the Pennsylvania episode lends support to our suspicions on this score.

The Allies defeated Herr Adolf Schickelgrüber (Hitler), NOT Germany. On the contrary, assisted by the absorption by and penetration of the CIA by multiple ‘rehabilitated’ Nazis thanks to that ‘reverse takeover’ masterminded in the 1940s with treacherous US State Department connivance inter alia by General Reinhard Gehlen – the thuggish Abwehr Nazi intelligence chief who had overseen the repression in the German-occupied areas of the Soviet Union – the CIA became the main ‘active’ component of the Nazi Continuum. This accounts for its hideous Himmlerian abominations over the years, its satanic experimentation operations, its ‘Black’ offensives against the American people and the Rest of the World, its Nazi-type military aggressiveness and its repulsive arrogance, its absolute disdain of and hatred for the Rule of Law, and the reality that it is much more dangerous nowadays than the KGB-GRU ever was.

So what we are actually confronting is indeed the Nazi Continuum, secretly supported as always by (covert) Soviet Communism – the US component of which, at the present time, is headed by Leon Panetta. This Director of Central Intelligence, who controls the White House, was reported to the Editor of this service to be STILL blocking the Settlements as of 5th March 2010.

But even as we were being told this, something interesting happened behind the scenes. Which brings us to the real nub of the matter.

‘WALKING IN A STRAIGHT LINE’ WILL EXPOSE THE DECEPTIONS
The struggle that has been raging behind these scenes within and close to the DC Beltway reflects:

• A corrupt and criminal official determination to frustrate the Bank for International Settlements’ instructions (‘Line Item’) designating the conduct of the necessary and overdue G-7-approved on-balance sheet, fully taxable and transparent PRIVATE SECTOR Refunding of the US Dollar to Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., who, we were informed by US ‘inside’ sources (who will be exposed if this turns out to be false) is regarded by personnel working for The Queen as the only expert who can be trusted with this task.

• If none of this is true, the preceding report, containing a letter from Mr A. Clifton Hodges to the Editor of this service for onward delivery (which was implemented) to Buckingham Palace, was intended to expose the deception and those engaged perpetrating it (whose names we know, if they are so engaged, and who will be exposed along with the other deceivers, should a deception have been perpetrated. In accordance with our policy of ‘walking in a straight line’, we continue to assume that this is not the case: but we shall see).

• What certainly IS known is that the foregoing background has been used – in a similar manner as the Leo Wanta cover involving this Editor was exploited – to provide ‘smokescreen’ cover for an operation which might (in this context) supposedly enable the criminal perpetrators to conduct the Dollar Refunding themselves, for their own illicit profit, using FRNs, not US Treasury dollars.

In other words, the perpetrators have remained hell-bent on blocking the will of the international financial community as expressed via the BIS refunding ‘Line-Item’ instructions, given their horror at the prospect of losing control – and have illegally frustrated the intended use of the $6.2 trillion loan funds provided on 19th-20th July 2007 via the Bank of England under levy to six US money center banks, via the Bank of New York Mellon (as it became, effective July 2007).

COTTRELL THREATENS TO SNATCH AWAY THE RACKETEERS’ COVER,
THROWING THEM INTO A MAD PANIC. THIS WAS NOT ANTICIPATED.
On Friday 5th March, in telephone conversations, including one with the Editor of this service, attended by every despicable intelligence eavesdropper under the sun, Michael Cottrell stated unequivocally that if the $6.2 trillion refunding loan, as pre-agreed, is withheld from Mr Cottrell’s firm, Pennsylvania Investments Inc., he will walk away.

This statement evidently caused panic and a hurried strategic deception rethink inside the Beltway and in the other dark corners of the US criminal universe in question – more or less proving that, as with the Wanta operation which exploited both Mr Cottrell’s securities market expertise and this Editor’s publishing and publicity abilities and qualifications, the perpetrators had been using Mr Cottrell as cover for an intended deviation from the agreed-upon Basel instructions.

• The pending Pennsylvania Fraud exposure will PROVE THAT THIS ASSESSMENT IS CORRECT.

• The intention is for the proceeds of racketeering operations to be channelled inter alia into the hands of the partners of Deutsche AG, St Gallen, Switzerland.

And as indicated above, we know precisely who is behind this typical piece of CIA/DVD duplicity: and if it continues, they will be exposed by name. But, as always happens with these investigations, THIS OPERATION HAS ALREADY BEEN BLOWN. And it has been ‘blown’ because, whereas we have been walking ‘in a straight line’, the snakes are incapable of doing anything but slithering.

THE TWO MI-6 OPERATIVES WITH THE QUEEN’S SIGNATURE:
ARE THEY WORKING FOR, OR ARE THEY DOUBLE-CROSSING THE QUEEN?
It now has to be stated that if the two MI-6 operatives said to be carrying The Queen’s signature authority are or have been double-crossing Her Majesty, we will get to the bottom of that, as well, and will expose them, also. After all, we were able to expose the false assertion by the US ‘inside’ sources that Roy Grantham is a Representative of The Queen, when we asked Grantham to get in touch with us via this website. Although Grantham lives just a couple of miles from the Editor’s office, he saw fit to instruct a firm of ‘heavies’, based in Shreveport, LA, to issue a blatant threat by email against the Editor of this service.

• This ‘investigator’ said that Grantham would not be contacting the Editor of this service in view of his interest in preserving his ‘Stellar’ [note the geomasonic language] reputation.

Beyond this, it now has to be said that if the British Monarchical Power does not INSIST upon the agreed-upon Group of Seven-approved, private sector-based transparent, taxed Dollar Refunding operation proceeding precisely as specified by Basel, and is prepared to put up valuable assets in exchange for worthless Federal Reserve Notes, the Monarchy will self-destruct – WHICH IT IS THE OBJECTIVE OF THE PAN-GERMAN ENEMY TO PROCURE, since the British Monarchy stands in the way of the comprehensive realisation of Germany’s insidious and now collapsing ‘Europe from the Atlantic to the Urals/Vladivostok’ hegemony plans.

WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THE CHINESE CURRENCY BOXES?
The same applies to the Chinese. What happened to the Chinese currency boxes which were made available SPECIFICALLY to provide backing for the Treasury dollar? Are the Chinese also stupidly risking their assets in exchange for worthless FRNs, as well – notwithstanding their knowledge that the US officials in charge are racketeers, and in spite of the still undischarged lien for $47 trillion against the US Treasury imposed on or about 6th December 2009?

GREEK DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER EQUATES NAZI GERMANY
WITH CHANCELLOR MERKEL’S STASI GERMANY
It is certainly true that the catastrophic (and soon to become even more catastrophic) European project is on the verge of self-destruction, too. In late February 2010, in an interview with the BBC, the Greek Deputy Prime Minister accused NAZI GERMANY – clearly eliding Nazi Germany with the current German STASI régime – of ‘taking away the gold that was in the Bank of Greece, and they never gave it back. They shouldn’t complain so much about stealing and not being very specific about [their] economic dealings’.

• In other words; WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT, FRAU MERKEL?

• The fact that Greece and Germany have since been in discussions, does NOT expunge the Greek Deputy Prime Minister’s pointed observation from the record.

As previously reviewed, Greece’s massive toxic debt was accumulated under the preceding Greek Government as a consequence of Fraudulent Finance and racketeering operations with associates of the Bush/CIA/DVD Crime Syndicate via Citibank Athens, as we originally revealed a long time ago.
Far from being the weak partner, therefore, Greece is in fact in a position to DESTROY the entire poisonous pan-German hegemony operation, and in our opinion may well wind up doing so – as will similar situations waiting to explode among the PIGS (VIZ. Portugal, Italy (Greece) and Spain, which ought to read PIIGS, since Ireland is in the same position. A country with a huge trade surplus and a colossal current account deficit is in SERIOUS TROUBLE.

Uncoincidentally, each of these countries, as well as Iceland and the corrupted United Kingdom itself, has provided Fraudulent Finance ‘counterparty racketeering services’ to elements and associates of the Bush-CIA/DVD Crime Syndicate – with accruals doubtless pouring into Deutsche AG, St Gallen, for the benefit of Bush Senior, Gorbachëv (Orbach), Kohl and Ackermann.

WHAT DO THE FOUR RACKETEERS HAVE IN COMMON
WITH OTHER WELL-KNOWN DECEASED AND LIVING OPERATIVES?
What do these four racketeers have in common with the following deceased and living revolutionary operatives?

Andropov, Yuri (Lieberman)
Barroso, José Manuel
Biden, Joseph
Brown, Gordon
Bush Jr., George W.
Bush Sr., George H. W.
Clinton, Hillary Rodomski
Clinton, William Jefferson (Rockefeller)
Dodd, Senator Christopher
Emanuel, Rahm
Farage, Nigel
Geithner, Timothy
Grossart, Sir Angus
Khrushchev, Nikita (Perlmutter)
Medvedev (Menakhem Aaronovich Mendel)
Panetta, Leon
Paulson, Henry M.
Putin, Vladimir Vladimirovich (Shalomov)
Salmond, Alex
Sarkozy, Nicolas
Schickelgrüber, Adolf (Hitler)
Stalin, Josef (Djiugashvili-Kochba)?

FORECLOSURE ANALYSIS’ PARA-LEGAL SERVICES SPRINGING UP IN THE UNITED STATES
We turn now to the central issue: that securitisation is illegal under US law and indeed in all Common Law jurisdictions. There are NO REDEEMING FEATURES.

Services are now springing up in the United States providing a ‘Foreclosure Autopsy’ assessment in which breaks in the chain of title, missing assignments, unlawful substitution of trustees and blatant fraud and forgery, is typically identified. Such services do not provide actual legal advice: what they do is offer recorded information in support of any planned evidentiary hearing or legal discovery going all the way back to the original creditor/depositor. Every recorded document can be identified and surfaced for distressed homeowners – representing a broad foreclosure analysis resource support system via reliable established networks, local title companies, county recorders and other parties, especially in non-judicial foreclosure states like California, Arizona and Nevada, which appear to be states in the greatest need – given that it has been predicted that some 3.4 million foreclosures are anticipated across the United States over the rest of this calendar year (see Note 5 below for more background to this ‘utter corruption’).

NORTHERN ROCK’S LIES TO A FORMER MORTGAGOR MASKING
THE FACT THAT HER TITLE DEEDS WERE ‘OTHERWISE ENGAGED’
In Britain, we have been engaged with a householder who paid off her mortgage with Northern Rock in June 2004. In exchange, Northern Rock informed the lady that they would be forwarding her Title (Lease) documents, but failed to do so for five years – proffering every excuse under the sun for their gross failure, including the statement that her title documents had been ‘dematerialised’ – before, all of a sudden, forwarding her missing documents under cover of a letter saying that ‘it has come to our notice that we did not return your Title Documents in June 2004. Here they are. Please keep them in a safe place’.

• This occurred in June 2009, after the householder had torn her hair out, metaphorically speaking, for five long years trying to extract her documents from this reprobate lender.

In this instance, it is likely that, given that Northern Rock had had to be taken over by the British Government (since Gordon Brown was terrified at the media coverage of long lines of customers outside Northern Rock branches seeking to retrieve their savings, as in Argentina), the British Government’s lawyers may well have instructed Northern Rock to disgorge the said householder’s documents, which may have been encumbered by incorporation within a securitisation package.

The lady accepted a ‘compensation’ payment of £150 brokered by the Financial Ombudsman (which seems to exist to protect recalcitrant financial institutions operating within the British jurisdiction from determined ladies like this householder who will not take prevarication for an answer), on the basis of blatantly fraudulent information (e.g. that her title documents had been ‘dematerialised’ – a false statement placed in writing by Northern Rock).

We have comprehensively deconstructed this Northern Rock case, with facsimiles of the relevant correspondence, in the forthcoming huge issue of International Currency Review (6), indicating that Northern Rock lied to the householder, who was accordingly subjected to five years of anxiety and was unable to exercise her right to move home at any time during those five years.

• UPDATE: The householder wrote many days ago to Northern Rock asking them to answer her question, YES or NO: were her Title Deeds assigned and incorporated in a securitisation package without her permission? As of this date [11th March], THERE HAS BEEN NO RESPONSE. This is because they can’t answer the question without re-incriminating themselves. They have lied in writing already, so they have a major problem: as does the British Government, as the bank is controlled by the Government. We’ll see where the serpents in question slither and writhe to.

• MORTGAGE DECEPTION IN SPAIN: This morning [11th March], we received an email from a UK correspondent who writes: ‘I have a house in Spain, with a mortgage attached to it from Banco do Valencia’. Three years ago, the lady in question sought specific answers to her questions about prospective changes to the conditions of the mortgage. The bank failed to respond at all.

Moreover even after she complained to the bank’s Head Offfice, enclosing all the correspondence, there was no reply. Some time later the bank branch manager admitted to the lady that the changes that she requested could not be implemented BECAUSE THE MORTGAGE HAD BEEN ‘SOLD’ ON TO ANOTHER COMPANY. But of course the Spanish bank refused to provide any details of the company in question, let alone guidance on how they could be contacted. This revealed that, as in the cited Northern Rock case, Banco do Valencia are hiding something.

Our correspondent states: ‘So I pay my monthly mortgage to Banco do Valencia without having a clue who really owns that debt or who I am ultimately paying. This chimes with your Northern Rock exposure. Keep up the good work’.

• Two points: (1): NEVER DO BUSINESS IN SPAIN. They will always deceive and double-cross you. And: (2): The fact that Britain and Spain are satrap states caught in the European Union Collective entrapment net MAKES NO DIFFERENCE. Sheisters are sheisters, no matter what the regime.

• AND A VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE PROFESSIONAL UK CORRESPONDENT ADDS [11th March]:
‘From my own experience of finance companies’ ‘lawlessness’, they never back down even when shown that their actions are illegal or contracts unenforceable; and the standard ploy is not to answer letters… In psychological terms, this shows that they are extremely afraid, beneath the superficial impression of arrogance that they display. Their power, therefore, is an illusion’.

• Editor’s add-on: With the Northern Rock test case, we can assure you that there will be no let-up as they have been caught lying to the former mortgagor IN WRITING and there’s not a lot they can do to retrieve their situation. No doubt the Government’s lawyers will be forced to intervene.

SECURITISATION IS A KEY ELEMENT OF A REVOLUTIONARY ATTACK ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
When you consider that, as will now be rehearsed, securitisation is completely illegal under US and Common Law, you can see not only that these criminal enterprise financial institutions are well and truly on the wrack, but also WHY there has been such intense and ruthless ongoing RESISTANCE to the exposure of this rampant dirty racketeering activity – which represents nothing less than an intentional, sustained and suitably ‘below the radar’ offensive by the manipulators of the World Revolution against private property – being micromanaged in parallel with the so-called ‘sexual revolution’ and ‘upside down’ outpouring of every form of reprobate behaviour and perverted sex which is aimed at destroying the family, regarded by these long-range geomasonic maniacs as the glue which ‘legitimises’ private property.

Even if a jaded observer has zero knowledge of the progress of the World Revolution, which has reached an advanced (and yet fragile) stage in our era, the relentlessly comprehensive spread and coverage of the racketeering and corruption being perpetrated against private home owners can easily be seen to be ‘no accident’. As with ALL dimensions of the World Revolution, one has to ask oneself: how come that this nefarious, barbaric behaviour appeared suddenly and on such a truly colossal scale in every corner of the world almost simultaneously? None of this is coincidental: people who treat such developments as ‘phenomena’ without enquiring WHY these things are happening, are destined to languish in permanent ignorance of the truth.

YES, A RUTHLESS, SYSTEMATIC ATTACK ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
And the truth IS that what we are exposing is nothing less than a carefully planned, ruthless, determined and systematic revolutionary attack on private property.

• No wonder Gorbachëv sits, to this day, in a huge wing of the Kremlin, as before.

HE COLLABORATED WITH BUSH SENIOR to unleash this scourge on homeowners in the United States, Britain and the White Commonwealth countries – the ‘Main Enemy’, in collaboration with the covert Soviets’ intelligence allies, German ‘Black’ intelligence (DVD, DACHAU), hiding behind the front conveniently provided by the duplicitous French under the Treaty of the Elysée.

The criminal mentality seeks at all costs to entangle its targets in its own corruption, so that if anything goes wrong, the targeted parties are readily identifiable as racketeers, thereby providing the originating perpetrators with cover (so they imagine).

Hence the subversion through corruption of foreign counterparties – in Britain, Iceland, Greece, Italy, the Vatican, Spain, Portugal, Albania, North Korea, India, China, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Cyprus and wherever willing trading counterparties may be found.

LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR SCAMS STILL ‘OUT THERE’
That such Fraudulent Finance operations have continued as though there had been no historical discontinuity is of course well known. But a good deal of ‘scraping of the barrel’ is also taking place. Last year we drew attention to certain curious money-lending activities that were being fronted or sponsored by Newsmax.com which we were advised may be borderline financial scams.

The lowest racketeering common denominator we have ever come across, dated 2nd March 2010, from Cyprus – signed off by one Mr Ahmet Z. Altunis, ‘Principal Right Holder. World Wide Funding Trust’ seeks clients inter alia in the United States, to take advantage of their services for all ‘your unconventional funding needs’:

‘We give big opportunity to enter trade (PPP). If your assets SKRs (Safe-Keeping Receipts), Notes, Lease MTNS, Bond(s), IBOS, CMOS, have no available credit line now, we open credit line to your name. You can enter (PPP), your big profit [to] finance your project. We begin New Year contracts 2010: Enter Gateway to unlimited opportunities…. Send LOI + CIS + SKR + Passport. Then we open and activate credit line under YOUR NAME, even [though] the credit line is open on our name… Client have NO RISKS at 100%, all is secured by our and their lawyers, no tricks’.

When this crude solicitation written in barbaric English was sent to us from the United States, we were told that it represents a lowest common denominator fraud serving the Bush Crime Syndicate network. In due course, the client is asked for an up-front fee of between 12,800 and 15,000 Euros to cover ‘due diligence costs’, so it looks like a standard ‘Nigerian-type’ scam: but it isn’t.

Targets are being enticed into securitisation deals, which are illegal as indicated below, under US and Common Law. The solicitation sent to us (above) was being widely disseminated within the United States by US parties (wire fraud).

WHY SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. AND COMMON LAW
Securitisation is illegal under US legislation – primarily because it is fraudulent and causes specific violations of R.I.C.O., usury, Antitrust and bankruptcy laws. And it flies in the face of public policy in numerous ways, as is expounded in extensive detail in an analysis to be published in our journal Economic Intelligence Review 2009Q1 (7) with several pages of book, article and case references.

To begin with, securitisation violates US State usury legislation. Secondly, all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ as well as ‘assignment’ securitisations are essentially tax evasion schemes, and the penalties for tax evasion in the United States are excessively severe.

Thirdly, in all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations, the conflict of interest inherent in the sponsor also serving as the servicer constitutes fraud and conversion. In the fourth place, in all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations where the Special Purpose Vehicle [SPV] is a trust, the declaration of trust is void, as it exists for an illegal purpose.

In the fifth place, off-balance sheet treatment of asset-backed securities (both for ‘true-sale’ and for assignment transactions) constitutes fraud.

Sixth, all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations involve blatant fraudulent conveyances. In the seventh place, securitisation usurps United States bankruptcy laws and is accordingly illegal, as well as being also demonstrably contrary to public policy.

SECURITISATION ENTAILS GROSS VIOLATIONS OF R.I.C.O. STATUTES
In ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations, there are fraudulent transactions which serve as ‘predicate acts’ under US Federal R.I.C.O. statutes.

The specific R.I.C.O. sections are: Section 1341 (mail fraud); Section 1343 (wire fraud); Section 1344 (financial institution fraud); Section 1957 (engaging in monetary transactions improperly derived from specified unlawful activity) [‘the money you make from the illegal exploitation of my money, is my money’]; and Section 1952 (racketeering).

Furthermore, securitisation constitutes violations of American antitrust statutes through market integration, syndicate collusion, price formation, vertical foreclosure, tying, price-fixing, predatory pricing, and the rigging of allocations.

Securitisation also involves void contracts, given the lack of consideration, illusory promises, the absence of any actual bargain, the absence of mutuality – and finally illegal subject matter and the contravention of public policy.

Securitisation is riddled with Fraudulent Transfer, Fraud in the Inducement, Fraud in Fact by Deceit, Theft by Deception (Fraudulent Concealment) and Fraudulent Conveyance: see the US securities regulations routinely breached in such activity, listed at the foot of this report and of most of these reports for THE PAST THREE YEARS, and other laws also routinely flouted in this context.

NOTWITHSTANDING THAT IT’S ILLEGAL, U.S. AUTHORITIES
CONTINUE TO PROMOTE AND ENCOURAGE SECURITISATION
Yet notwithstanding such crystal-clear indications that securitisation is 100% ILLEGAL under US Law, as well as under Common Law generally (so that these findings are largely applicable in all Common Law countries), US authorities from the highest level downwards, financial institutions, intermediaries, Intelligence Power operatives and others are gearing up for what they doubtless hope will be intensified racketeering and trading activity with (corrupt) foreign counterparties.

This behaviour is being fine-tuned ‘as we speak’, despite the reality that the securitisation activity being planned and implemented violates innumerable US statutes in the manner we summarise above, and notwithstanding that such activity is contrary to public policy.

Indeed, it’s as though the Rule of Law did not exist. From the highest level of the US Treasury, the White House, the US State Department and the Central Intelligence Agency and its subsidiaries such as the lethal Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), the mindset, intention and perverse primary objective has all along been to resume Fraudulent Finance based on securitisation, as quickly and as seamlessly as possible. No wonder the five criminal Presidents DEMANDED immunity from prosecution from the World Court: did they arrange for key Justices (starting with the American Justice) at the World Court to receive pecuniary reward for granting them their demand?

SUMMARY FORENSIC ANALYSIS PROVING THE ILLEGALITY OF SECURITISATION
From whichever angle securitisation is considered, it is ILLEGAL. For example, the contracts are themselves VOID. This is because the process of securitisation involves several contracts that are either signed simultaneously, or within a short timeframe – many of which are rendered void inter alia because there is no consideration in contracts used in effecting the securitisations.

Many such contracts involve unilateral executory undertakings containing illusory promises. A unilateral executory promise is not a consideration. Such promises typically include a promise made by the Special Purpose Vehicle to pay out periodic interest, whether contingent or non-contingent on whether the collateral pays cash interest.

Collateral-substitution agreements contain a promise whereby the sponsor agrees to substitute impaired collateral. An assignment agreement of future (not yet existing) collateral may well be deemed a unilateral executory promise by the sponsor.

Illusory promises are not valid consideration for a contract. Such promises may be found in the Subscription/Purchase Agreement, whereby an existing asset is being exchanged for a future asset that does not exist as of the date of the subscription/purchase agreement. To make matters worse, none of the agreements typically signed by the investor as part of his/her purchase of the Special Purpose Vehicle’s Asset-Backed Securities expressly incorporates the (typically illusory) promises embodied in the offering prospectus.

OR: The Special Purpose Vehicle’s promise to pay interest and/or dividends on Asset-Backed Securities ‘Interest-Onlys’, Preferreds and ‘Pincipal-Onlys’ are essentially illusory promises because the underlying collateral may not produce any cash flows at all: so there won’t be any interest/dividend payments.

Moreover the lack of mutuality characterising such contracts renders them null and void, by definition. In any such contract, each party must have firm control of the subject matter of the contract and the underlying assets (consideration), and there MUST be a direct contractual relationship between the parties concerned.

But this is not the case, especially as the Special Purpose Vehicle’s corporate documents (trust indentures or bylaws or articles of incorporation) may typically limit the right of each Asset-Back Security investor; while there is typically no mutuality at all between the Special Purpose Vehicle and the sponsor/originator, because both entities are essentially the same, and are controlled by the sponsor before and after the securitisation takes place.

SECURITISATION: A COVER FOR TAX EVASION
In addition to their multiple violations of American State usury laws, all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment securitisations’ are essentially tax evasion arrangements. In the United States, the applicable tax evasion statute is the US Internal Revenue Code Section 7201 7 which reads: “Any person who willfully attempts in any manner to evade or defeat any tax imposed by this title or the payment thereof shall, in addition to other penalties provided by law, be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $100,000 ($500,000 in the case of a corporation), or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution”.

Under this statute and related case law, prosecutors must prove three elements beyond any reasonable doubt:

(1): The actus reus (the guilty conduct) – which consists of an affirmative act (not merely an omission or failure to act) that constitutes evasion or an attempt to evade either: (a) the assessment of a tax or (b) the payment of a tax.

(2): The mens rea or “mental” element of willfulness – the specific intent to violate an actually known legal duty. In the case of ‘true sale’ transactions, the tax evasion occurs because:

(a): The sponsor determines the price at which the collateral is transferred to the SPV, and hence, can arbitrarily lower/increase the price to avoid capital gains taxes – it being assumed here that the sponsor is a profit-maximising entity and will always act to minimise its tax liability and to avoid any tax assessment;

(b): The sponsor typically retains a ‘residual’ interest in the SPV in the form of IOs, POs and “junior piece”, which are typically taxed differently and on a different tax-basis compared with the original collateral: hence, the sponsor can lower the price of the collateral upon transfer to the SPV, and convert what would have been capital gains, into a non-taxable basis in the SPV “residual”;

(c): There is typically the requisite “intent” by the sponsor – evidenced by the arrangement of the transaction and the transfer of assets to the Special Purpose Vehicle;

(d): Before securitisation, collateral is typically reported in the sponsors’ financial statements at book value (that is, lower-of-cost-or-market: under both the US and the international accounting standards, loans and accounts receivable are typically not re-valued to market-value unless there has been some major impairment in value) which does not reflect true Market Values, and results in effective tax evasion on transfer of the collateral to the SPV, as any unrealised gain is not taxed;

(e): The actus reus is manifested by the execution of the securitisation transaction and transfer of assets to the SPV;

(f): The mens rea or specific intent is manifested by the elaborate arrangements implicit in securitisation transactions, the method of determination of the price of the collateral to be transferred to the SPV, the aims of securitisation, and the sponsor’s transfer of assets to the SPV;

(g): The unpaid tax liability consists of foregone tax on the capital gains from the collateral (the transaction is structured to avoid recognition of capital gains), and tax on any income from the collateral which is ‘converted’ into basis or other non-taxable forms;

(h): Income (from the collateral) that would have been taxable in the sponsor’s own financial statements, is converted into non-taxable basis in the form of the SPV’s Interest-Only (IO) and Principal-Only (PO) securities: part of the Interest-Spread (the difference between the SPV’s income and what it pays as interest and operating costs) is paid out to PO-holders, and this transforms interest into return-of-capital or just capital repayment, with no tax consequences. [Leaving aside the Ponzi scam dimension here – Ed.].

In cases of ‘disguised loan’ or ‘assignment’ securitisation transactions, tax evasion occurs:
(a): Because the sponsor determines the price at which the collateral is transferred to the SPV, and hence can lower/increase the price of the collateral to avoid capital gains taxes;

(b): Because the sponsor typically retains a ‘residual’ interest in the SPV which is normally taxed differently and on a different tax-basis compared to the original collateral: hence, the sponsor can lower the price upon transfer to the SPV, and convert what would have been capital gains, into non-taxable basis for tax purposes;

(c): Because the transfer of collateral to the SPV and the creation of Interest-Only and Principal-Only securities converts what would have been taxable capital gains into non-taxable basis;

(d): Because gain in the value of the collateral is not recognised for tax purposes, because there has not been any ‘sale’;

(e): Where the ABS is partly amortising, any capital gains are converted into interest payments;

(f): Because actus reus is manifested by the execution of the securitisation transaction and transfer of assets to the SPV;

(g): Because the mens rea or specific intent is manifested by the elaborate arrangements implicit in securitisation transactions, the objectives of securitisation and the sponsor’s transfer of assets to the Special Purpose Vehicle;

(h): Because the unpaid tax liability consists of tax on the capital gains from the transfer of the collateral (the transaction is structured to avoid recognition of a sale, whereas the transfer to the Special Purpose Vehicle is effectively a sale), and tax on any income from the collateral which is ‘converted’ into basis or other non-taxable forms, by securitisation.

SECURITISATION VIOLATES THE U.S BANKRUPTCY CODE
AND THEREFORE ALSO CONTRAVENES PUBLIC POLICY
Any transfer or conveyance of the assets of a debtor that is deemed to be made for the purposes of hindering, delaying or defrauding actual or potential creditors, may be determined by Courts to be a Fraudulent Conveyance under Section 548 of the US Bankruptcy Code or under a relevant theory of Constructive Fraud.

Although each US State has its own laws regarding the appropriate elements of proof of Constructive Fraud, Section 548(a)(2) of the US Bankruptcy Code permits an inference of Constructive Fraud if the following factors exist:

(1): The debtor received less than reasonably equivalent value for the property transferred; and:

(2): The debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the transfer, or else retained unreasonably small capital after the transfer, or made the transfer with the intent or belief that it would incur debts beyond its ability to pay.

The following theories of Fraudulent Conveyance within the context of securitisation may apply:

• Where the sponsor/originator receives insufficient value for assets transferred.

• Where there is an ‘intent to hinder, delay or defraud’ creditors (representing an implicit pre-petition waiver of one’s right to file for bankruptcy), with regard to the originator’s transfer of assets to the SPV, or the originator’s transfer of assets to the SPV has clearly not been undertaken on an arms’-length basis.

• Where securitisation increases the originator’s bankruptcy risk; and:

• In all instances where securitisation usurps the United States’ bankruptcy laws and is therefore illegal on such a basis alone.

SECURITISATION VIOLATES FEDERAL R.I.C.O. STATUTES
Turning now to the reality that securitisation constitutes a violation of US Federal R.I.C.O. Statutes [see Legal Notes below], we can state without equivocation that the entire securitisation process constitutes violations of Federal R.I.C.O. statutes, because:

(1): There is the requisite criminal or civil ‘enterprise’ – consisting of the sponsor/issuer, the trustees and the intermediary bank. These three parties work closely together to effect the securitisation transaction.

(2): There are ‘predicate acts’ of:

(a): Mail fraud – using the mails for sending out materials among themselves and to investors.

(b): Wire fraud – using wires to engage in fraud by communicating with investors.

( c): Conversion – where there isn’t proper title to collateral.

(d): Deceit: misrepresentation of issues and facts pertaining to the securitisation transaction.

(e): Securities fraud: disclosure issues.

(f): It entails loss of profit opportunity.

(g): It involves the making of false statements and or misleading representations
about the value of the collateral.

(h): It entails stripping the originator/issuer of the ability to pay debt claims or judgment claims in bankruptcy court – a state of affairs that may apply where the sponsor is financially distressed and the cash proceeds of the transaction are significantly less than the value of the collateral.

There is also typically the requisite ‘intent’ by members of the enterprise – evident in knowledge (actual and inferable), acts, omissions, purpose (actual and inferable) and results. Intent can be reasonably inferred from:

(a): The existence of a sponsor that seeks to raise capital – and cannot raise capital on better terms by other means;

(b): The participation of an investment bank that has very strong incentives to consummate the transaction on any agreeable (but not necessarily reasonable) terms.

SECURITISATION ALSO VIOLATES U.S. ANTITRUST LEGISLATION
Securitisation further constitutes violations of US Antitrust laws, because the American Asset-Backed Securities and Mortgage-Backed Securities markets are dominated by relatively few large entities such as FNMA (Fannie Mae), Freddie Mac, the top five investment banks (all of which have conduit programs), and the top five credit card issuers (MBNA, AMEX, Citigroup, etc.), etc.. As a consequence, the top five ABS/MBS issuers control more than 50% of the US ABS/MBS market. This constitutes illegal market concentration under US Antitrust legislation.

THE ‘PHILIPPINES EXCEPTION’ BURIED IN THE CLAYTON ACT
In the Antitrust context, however, observe the following text from the Clayton Act, which specifically EXCLUDES transactions undertaken with The Philippines. Isn’t that interesting?

It provides a blanket rationale for the massive past and ongoing US clandestine focus on The Philippines, the CIA’s need for ‘black hole’ conditions there in connection with successive US operations to relieve Presidents Marcos and Aquino of the stolen and hidden ‘Yamashita’s gold’, the US Fraudulent Finance operations using Philippine institutions and related operations based in that territory, an aborted US operation to convert The Philippines into a new US State (as had been planned under Clinton for Somalia), and the frequent visits of operatives known to ourselves to The Philippines under cover of attending to ‘orphanages’:

§ 1 Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 12 Definitions; short title:
(a) “Antitrust laws”, as used herein, includes the Act entitled:
‘An Act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies’, approved July second, eighteen hundred and ninety; sections seventy-three to seventy-seven, inclusive, of an Act entitled ‘An Act to reduce taxation, to provide revenue for the Government, and for other purposes’, of August 27th, eighteen hundred and ninety-four; an Act entitled ‘An Act to amend sections seventy-three and seventy-six of the Act of August twenty-seventh, eighteen hundred and ninetyfour’, entitled ‘An Act to reduce taxation, to provide revenue for the Government, and for other purposes’, approved February twelfth, nineteen hundred and thirteen; and also this Act.

‘Commerce’, as used herein, means trade or commerce among the several States and with foreign nations, or between the District of Columbia or any Territory of the United States and any State, Territory, or foreign nation, or between any insular possessions or other places that are under the jurisdiction of the United States, or between any such possession or place and any US State or Territory of the United States or the District of Columbia or any foreign nation, or within the District of Columbia or any Territory or any insular possession or other place under the jurisdiction of the United States:

Provided, That nothing in this Act contained shall apply to the Philippine Islands. The word ‘person’ or ‘persons’ wherever used in this Act shall be deemed to include corporations and associations existing under or authorized by the laws of either the United States, the laws of any of the Territories, the laws of any State, or the laws of any foreign country.

FANNIE MAE, FREDDIE MAC ENGAGED IN FURTHER ILLEGAL SECURITISATION:
RE-SECURITISING ALREADY SECURITISED ‘DUD’ ASSETS TO DUMP BACK ON THE BANKS
Even so, it became apparent in early March that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, both controlled by the US Government, are preparing to force financial enterprises such as the CIA’s Bank of America Corporation, JP Morgan Chase & Co, Wells Fargo and Citigroup, Inc., to buy back further waves of newly securitised packages of mortgages – i.e., the former Government-Sponsored Enterprises are reportedly engaged again in repackaging mortgage securities already marked down to ‘true’ value.

In other words, they are trying to dump faulty securitised loans, as well as straight loans, back on the participating banks – under cover of such fantasies as the double-minded statement attributed to Sharon McHale, spokes‘person’ for Freddie Mac, located adjacent to the CIA in McLean, Virginia, on 5th March 2010: ‘We are trying to be good stewards of taxpayer dollars and as part of that, it’s important that those dollars not go to loans that should not have been sold to us in the first place’ – throwing the blame for Freddie Mac’s own scandalous racketeering behaviour back at the banks.

• Being interpreted, what this woman was saying was: this:

‘We are covering ourselves with a mantle of rectitude by posing as protectors of the taxpayer’s dollars in order to obfuscate our own ongoing racketeering behaviour, even as we prepare further Fraudulent Finance securitisations in violation of the relevant US legislation: and we couldn’t care less because we are owned by the Government itself, which is up to its neck in such violations’.

And Paul Miller, a former examiner for the Federal Reserve (hardly a guarantee of integrity, given the Fed’s own reputation for Fraudulent Finance), based in Arlington, VA, let the cat out of the bag with: ‘If you want to originate mortgages and keep that pipeline running, you have to deal with the push-backs. It doesn’t matter how much you hate Fannie and Freddie’ – and neither, apparently, does it matter to what extent the Rule of Law is cynically violated ‘in order to keep the pipeline (of Fraudulent Finance) running’.

GARY GENSLER IS NOT AS OPPOSED TO FRAUDULENT FINANCE AS HE SEEMS
The appointment of Gary Gensler as Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission under President Obama was greeted with signs of relief on Wall Street. Here was a hardened former Goldman Sachs trader with 18 years’ experience with that cynical, ruthless money shop, who could be relied upon to act at all times in the interests of Wall Street, not the investor and taxpayer.

But, as has since been reported elsewhere, over a private lunch at the Waldorf Astoria in midtown Manhattan on 6th January 2010, the 52-year-old Gary Gensler caused indigestion among the self-satisfied guests at the luncheon – Timothy O’Hara, head of global credit at Crédit Suisse Holdings USA, Inc.; Robert P. Kelly, CEO at Bank of New York Mellon Corporation; David B. Heller, co-head of the securities division at Goldman Sachs; and Seth Waugh, CEO of Deutsche Bank Americas.

Because when one banker asked Gensler what or whom he saw as the biggest obstacles to reform in the securities and commodities sectors, he replied: ‘You’ (8).

Mr Gensler has been seeking derivatives control legislation that goes beyond current proposals, including what President Obama put forward during the summer of 2009. Notwithstanding the fact that if the derivatives situation is not addressed, the forthcoming crash will be so horrific as to be likely to tip the world into open, rather than covert, warfare, a certain Samuel Hayes, Professor Emeritus of Investment Banking at Harvard Business School, Boston, told Bloomberg in February 2010 that ‘Gensler is going to raise real concerns’ for financial firms.

‘Derivatives are absolutely central to what is Wall Street in the 21st century’ – namely, a casino. ‘Nobody wants the regulations to affect them’ (9).

‘GREATER TRANSPARENCY’ IS EVIDENTLY ALL HE‘S AFTER
On closer examination, Mr Gensler has actually been pushing for ‘more transparency’ in the over-the-counter derivatives market, so as to lower spreads between buyers and sellers and to make it easier for new competitors to enter the market – which the big banks aren’t keen on, as more participants will deprive them of profit.

So, Gary Gensler is not actually in the business of tackling the underlying crisis arising from the determination of financial institutions to continue playing Russian roulette, using the model first developed by the US Intelligence Power as it sought what it thought were foolproof methods of ensuring its financial independence from Congress and the open-ended funding pipelines that it considered appropriate to buttress its usurped status as a recalcitrant ‘State within the State’ impervious to reform and determined to brook no interference with its stolen hegemony.

INVESTORS’ MONEY USED TO REMUNERATE WALL STREET
In any case, the derivatives institutions and their back-up infrastructure have not the slightest intention of adopting any course other than ’business as usual‘ – and on a far larger scale than in the past. This obtuse madness WILL lead to a global collapse, as derivatives products are usually without real value. As a noted article in The New York Times of 7th February 2010 at last stated, investment banks trading derivatives do not own the mortgage bonds, the obligations from home owners, notes signed by home owners or the mortgage deeds of the deeds of trust.

The ‘structured products’, consisting of bundled documents ostensibly relating to the above but having NO RECOURSE to underlying real value, were, however, invested with ‘value’ arising from the name of the institution marketing the ‘asset’ – that is to say, arbitrary ‘value’ arising from the fact that, as a Goldman Sachs compliance officer actually admitted to the Editor of this service: ‘A structured product is worth what someone is prepared to pay for it’ – a penetrating statement which encapsulates the possibility that it may be (is) worthless: which is indeed the case.

‘THE MONEY YOU MAKE BY MISUSING MY MONEY IS MY MONEY’ – I.E., THE HOME OWNER’S
The money sloshing around between investment banks in this dirty market was investors’ money unwittingly advanced into pools of capital which winds up being used primarily to finance the fees, profits, insurance proceeds, insurance premia, and so forth – all for the benefit of Wall Street, paid to the investment banks, and not to investors who stumped up the money in the first place.

These fees and relationships are not and have never been disclosed to the home owner despite, in the United States, clear legislation requiring such transparency, including the Truth in Lending Act, and Deceptive Lending – which require full transparency and disclosure.

• Further legislation applicable to the securities sector in the United States is re-listed below – in the list that we have republished at the foot of our website reports for the past three years.

• The list of applicable securities regulations and laws is augmented by a legal tutorial which, again, we have published for the past three years at the foot of these reports,

It would appear that, notwithstanding such reminders, Wall Street and its compliant infrastructure, as well as its co-conspiring portfolio of dubious foreign trading counterparty institutions, has every intention of continuing to violate the relevant US rules and legislation – while at the same time continuing to abuse, in the mortgage sector, the home owner with the same cynicism as in the past.

Given the legal principle that ‘the money you make from misusing my money is my money’, it is quite clear that undisclosed fees, profits, kickbacks and other financial abuses perpetrated by these big speculative financial entities which produce no real wealth at all, but simply move money around between themselves, are payable to the home owner who signed the ‘loan’ papers in the first place.

A PERVERSE AND ARROGANT OFFICIAL INTENT TO CONTINUE VIOLATING U.S. LAW
But none of these realities – which have been rammed home by the technical work that we have published on this subject in International Currency Review, prepared by Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. – have had any impact so far on the thinking of derivatives sector participants, analysts and observers, who appear to be hell-bent on continuing to violate US legislation.

On the contrary, these people are concerned exclusively with ensuring that the discontinuity that enveloped their sector and the financial markets as a whole in mid-September 2008 – is reversed, even though a total resumption of derivatives trading at full throttle WILL lead the world, and all engaged in this fraudulent activity, into a black hole

Moreover, since cracks are appearing in the entire structure of sophisticated finance ‘as we speak’, centred on Greece – the previous Government of which incurred, through Fraudulent Finance operations using Citibank, Athens, as counterparty to Bush/Cheney trading activities, an immense portfolio of derivatives obligations estimated at 300 billion Euros off-balance sheet, which can never be honoured – the timing of the collapse need no longer be measured in years.

So the self-centred, myopic speculative institutions are behaving like gun-toting bandits in a department store – determined to have their own way, irrespective of the consequences: one of which is that in the event of default, colossal payouts are due on Credit Default Swap contracts, which in fact amounts to institutionalised blackmail.

THE DEPOSITORY TRUST & CLEARING CORPORATION IS IN OVERDRIVE
For its part, the main component of the derivatives infrastructure supporting this prospectively catastrophic speculative activity is the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) – best known for its Cede & Co. partnership nominee facility, which is the holder of almost every physical stock certificate in existence, and boasts of accounting for more than $2.0 quadrillion in (largely fake) securities transactions annually.

On 10th February 2010, the DTCC announced that the Federal Reserve Board had approved its application to establish a DTCC subsidiary which is to be a member of the Federal Reserve System to operate ‘the Trade Information Warehouse (Warehouse) for over-the-counter (OTC) credit derivatives and the ‘legally accepted’ global depository for over-the-counter credit derivatives transactions’. (10).

THE FEDERAL RESERVE HAS BECOME
THE BACK-STOP GUARANTOR OF CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS
Which means, in practice, that the Federal Reserve is now the GUARANTOR behind all Credit Default Swap (CDS) transactions that clear via DTCC. The new Fed-endorsed organisation will settle CDS obligations in all currencies and process credit events. It will also handle all over-the-counter credit derivatives traded worldwide, will be regulated by the Federal Reserve and the New York State Banking Department, as well as being ‘overseen’ by other American as well as international regulators (via a sort of college of supervisors).

The DTCC’s Trade Information Warehouse will be operated by a Warehouse Trust, beginning its operations ‘once certain organizational conditions have been met, which are expected shortly’. It is understood that the company will have been funded and will have started operations by March.

One observer, commenting on these arrangements, wrote to say: ‘To be sure, the net notional CDS amount, which is what counterparties would be on the hook for in the case of an orderly unwind of the financial system, is materially lower than the gross total. Yet, as systemic unwinds are never orderly, gross tends to become net – as for instance when Lehman bonds went from par to 10 cents in the space of 24 hours. Should systemic risk flare up again’ (think Greece – Ed.), ’and fiat-based market values quickly catch up with ‘fair values’ – which in our Ponzi economy can very easily be calculated: they are ALL ZERO – the Federal Reserve will be on the hook’, with the US taxpayer, for amounts so large that the volume of printed money will reduce the value of a dollar to one cent or less within the space of a few weeks (or less).

So basis spreads can be expected to be severely compressed, once counterparty risk has become a thing of the past and all systemic risk in the biggest derivatives marketplace (excluding interest rate swaps) is fully backstopped (in theory) by the Federal Reserve.

In addition, the DTCC will be guaranteed monopoly status with respect to Credit Default Swap trading, as no-one in this business will wish to transact or clear anywhere else.

• FACT: Monopolies are illegal under US, British and European law.

STAGE SET FOR AN UNIMAGINABLE (AVOIDABLE)
CATASTROPHE: A DEATH-WISH
So the stage is well and truly set for a catastrophe of unimaginable proportions, bearing in mind that under Geithner as President, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York alone accumulated a portfolio of derivatives ‘assets’ commonly cited at $500 trillion, but which is probably much larger. This of course makes a complete nonsense of the formal derivatives data published by the Bank for International Settlements, which excludes double-counting; but none of these numbers can be relied upon, although the Bank for International Settlements’ information possesses the cachet of authority and has to be used for want of better data (11).

The DTCC is also boasting of further innovations, including the expansion of its Global Corporate Actions (GCA) service based on feedback, sourcing scheduled payment announcements from the Federal Reserve Board for US structured and non-structured securities, specifically Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac securities, which are not DTC-eligible; scheduled payments coverage to include international securities that are not DTC-eligible; and distribution information on UK Unit Trusts.

THE DTCC’S OBLIGATIONS WAREHOUSE SERVICE
The January 2010 issue of DTCC News and Information for DTCC customers further discusses how the DTCC’s Obligations Warehouse, to be launched by mid-2010, will quote ‘provide transparency for the industry and regulators while delivering operational efficiencies, cost savings and risk mitigation to financial firms’. The new service will ‘close the chapter on the manual processing of ex-clearing trades by empowering ops. professionals with a real-time automated service that will electronically manage these transactions and communicate a match to each side of the obligation’.

‘The Obligation Warehouse service will also automate the management of non-Continuous Net Settlement (CNS) fails. ’Because these trades exist outside Continuous Net Settlement, the back office faces an accounting nightmare in handling these transactions – not to mention bearing the added costs for maintaining comprehensive records and dedicated personnel to keep track of their status. The Obligation Warehouse will help mitigate this risk by consolidating all ex-clearing and non-CNS fails in a central location and storing them until settlement’.

‘The Obligation Warehouse enhances transparency by fully capturing, for the first time ever, all trading activity in NSCC-eligible securities in a central location from trade date until settlement. As a result, ex-clearing trades will no longer be invisible to all but the direct parties to that particular transaction. Instead, the industry and regulators will have a complete view of all open obligations traded in the US marketplace for equities, corporates, municipals and also unit trust investment securities – and [will] have a central vantage point to monitor and mitigate systemic risk’ (12).

GREATER TRANSPARENCY WON’T ELIMINATE SYSTEMIC RISK,
OR PREVENT A CONFIDENCE CRISIS
But while being able to see systemic risk stresses emerging may be an advantage, it won’t, and cannot, eliminate systemic risk. This is because these trades are fraudulent given the fact that securitisation violates US law (and Common Law in English-speaking countries), while in most contexts anyway, they are bedevilled by a lack of real value and non-recourse characteristics.

As for Credit Default Swaps, whatever the contract provides and whenever the counterparties decide on the basis of the contract that a default has taken place or is about to take place, it is in the interests of the provider to allow the default to take place, given the huge payouts which ensue. In other words, the contract is based on latent blackmail. That alone makes it illegal.

SO, WHERE ARE YOU, MR HOLDER?
Much more seriously, as summarised above, securitisation contracts are ALL ILLEGAL under US and Common Law. Therefore, all US official and ‘private’ sector operations being framed so as to revalidate and rehabilitate securitisation represent a perverse assault on the Rule of Law, and the commission of multiple felonies – accordingly leaving ALL perpetrators, whether holders of public office under the United States or any other level of government or employed by wayard financial institutions, or developing the securitisation infrastructure, vulnerable to criminal investigation, indictment, arrest and prosecution for gross and knowing violations of the law.

Whether the scandalous immunity from prosecution awarded by the World Court on demand to the five self-acknowledged criminal US Presidents protects them from the appropriate legal sanctions, prosecution and punishment within the US jurisdiction itself, isn’t clear: but we doubt it. Ironically, therefore, since the five Presidents have, by demanding immunity from prosecution from the World Court, acknowledged their own criminality, it is open to the US authorities to investigate, indict and arrest these operatives – since they have acknowledged their guilt. Where are you, Mr Holder?

Your job is to administer justice without fear or favour, isn’t it?

APPENDIX:
LORD MYNERS SAYS THERE MUST BE PENALTIES FOR BANK EXCESSES
On 8th March 2010, the UK ‘City Minister’ (Financial Services Secretary), Lord Myners, who in our opinion has been far too laid-back in failing to condemn criminality in the corrupted City of London, said that financial markets must ‘punish’ those who ‘make mistakes’ [sic!]. Without a ‘downside’, it would be impossible to ‘restore’ market discipline.

In all likelihood, Lord Myners didn’t really understand what he was saying – which was that the market system wasn’t functioning properly. And the reason for that is summarised in our report above: securitisation impedes the proper operation of market forces via its opposition to public policy in the bankruptcy context, its antitrust characteristics, and in the other ways described in outline in the present report. Does Myners understand this?

All that Lord Myners actually said, at a meeting in London, was that bankers had been obscenely remunerated even though they had ‘made serious mistakes’ (unspoken), code for ‘behaved like organized criminals’ (even more unspoken): ‘A lot of people lost money in the financial sector over the last few years – bank shareholders in particular suffered massive losses’.

‘But many people have been protected. Creditors have been bailed out. Far too many bankers themselves have enjoyed massive awards during the crisis, even as their firms were rescued’.

Well, we knew all that. When he got down to detail, Myners told the meeting that the Government was determined to ensure that no bank was too complex to fail. ‘We’re serious about removing the safety net that has allowed those with blind faith in market efficiency to ignore the consequences of their lack of discipline’ [sic! Let the word ‘criminality’ NEVER BE MENTIONED].

‘We are also working with G-20 countries and the IMF to access the feasibility of an international levy or fee on financial institutions. This will make sure that any residual insurance that banks are perceived to enjoy after living wills are implemented, will not come for free’.

Lord Myners then redeemed his rather shallow observations by pointing out that the implicit support of the financial industry in the past had probably represented the most expensive public subsidy to any industry in any part of the British economy, ‘vastly exceeding’ that paid to agriculture or the defence industry.

‘There is no reason why the public, taxpayers, should continue to provide a free at the source of delivery subsidy to the cost of capital of the banking system. We need to do everything we can to shrink the subsidy to zero’.

Under the Brown Government’s new Financial Services Bill, consumers would be granted new powers to seek redress through the courts. However the weakness of Lord Myners’ presentation was his complete failure to indicate that he and the Government understand that a colossal volume of the transactions which gave rise to the crisis in the first place were and remain ILLEGAL.

It’s no use trying to reform the ‘framework’ when the transactions being promoted within the framework contravene antimonopoly legislation, bankruptcy legislation and all the other elements of the law identified in outline above. So, laudable though Lord Myners’ objectives appear to be, he is in fact wasting everyone’s time.

He appears not to understand that the transactions which precipitated the crisis were CRIMINAL TRANSACTIONS, and his failure to address the criminality issue – which is really the ONLY issue – indicates that the Government in London is trying to cover up and ignore the criminality: because of the vast tax accruals from the recalcitrant financial sector that the Government needs more than ever, given its colossal subsidies to the criminal financial enterprises whose casino operations have been exposed.

POSTSCRIPT:
STIGLITZ: ‘THE AMERICAN BANKING SYSTEM IS CORRUPT’
The headline above appeared in the British press on 10th March 2010. Eager with anticipation and almost salivering with excitement, your correspondent rushed to read the article in question. Here, at last, he thought, was a fully paid-up member of the Great and the Good coming to his senses and calling a spade a spade at last. Alas, for Nobel Prize-winning Dr Stiglitz, a spade is in fact a fork.

Professor Stiglitz, who teaches at New York’s Columbia University, said that the Federal Reserve System ‘smells bad’. The Editor invoked the smell of the Fed, and of course agreed. But on further reading, it transpired that Dr Stiglitz was merely complaining that the Presidents of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks are chosen by commercial bankers.

‘The regional Reserve Banks… have a key role in regulation and in the last crisis [i.e., once again, it’s ‘in the past’: Ed.] of bailing out the banks. But the heads of these organisations are chosen by a committee dominated by the big banks that are being bailed out… so the people bailing out are appointed by the people who they bailed out. It smells bad. It looks bad. It undermines confidence’.

OH DEAR. Is this the best Dr Stiglitz can do? The American banking system is corrupt because the heads of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks are chosen by the big banks? Is that really, Dr S., the reason that the system is corrupt? Have we not been exposing rampant racketeering by the same big banks alluded to? Oh sorry, we forgot. He’s a Nobel Prize-winning economist.

The holder of a Nobel Prize can only say what’s considered kosher by the globalist internationalists who use the Nobel Prize system to ‘EMBED’ the ‘PARTY LINE’ in the public’s psyche. So the ‘party line’, as we speak, is to ACKNOWLEDGE that, yes, the US banking system is indeed corrupt, as Mr Story has been reiterating as nauseam, but to attribute this to the way the heads of the regional Feds are chosen. [With the Federal Reserve Board, the number of Feds is a geomasonic 13].

Notes and references:

(1): As previously reported, the Editor visited the veteran author and journalist Gordon Thomas, at his suggestion, in Bath in the fourth quarter of 2004.

During that visit, Mr Thomas indicated that MI-6 had informed the British media that Christopher Story has been a participant in the abortive putsch in Equatorial Guinea, with which Mark Thatcher was associated. Since the Editor of this service has done nothing, literally, since 1963, except run his publishing and print production businesses, the Editor asked why such lies and false witness would be perpetrated – especially against someone such as the Editor of this service whose loyalty to the Crown and the United Kingdom cannot possibly be, and has never been, questioned.

He replied:

‘They think you may be dangerous because you control your own
publications and you have the documents’.

In divulging this, of course, Mr Thomas revealed that MI-6 itself had something to hide. If the Editor was dangerous ‘because you hold the documents’, the documents themselves clearly represented elements of something much bigger. So the consequence of this intervention was that the Editor naturally redoubled his private investigations to establish what MI-6 were so anxious to cover up.

When the Editor protested to Thomas that the lies disseminated to the media about him were rank fabrications, Gordon Thomas uttered the memorable response:

‘It doesn’t matter that it’s not true. What matters is that it’s out there’.

In the course of this meeting, Gordon Thomas made it quite clear to the Editor that he is an agent of influence and acts as an agent for MI-6. He said that his father had been an MI-6 officer.

Given Thomas’s statement ‘It doesn’t matter that it’s not true. What matters is that it’s out there’, everything that Gordon Thomas himself publishes must, by definition, be questioned – since he was quite content to go along with this twisted and nefarious mentality.

• You could say that by revealing this to the Editor, both Thomas and MI-6 exhibited a degree of abject stupidity which perhaps we haven’t emphasised sufficiently.

Furthermore, it became quite obvious that the purpose of this exercise was intimidation. Thomas accompanied his message with a veiled threat, as well. Clearly, these people are accustomed to targets caving in to such pressures, and they have no immediate backstop plans when the target fails to react in accordance with their evil intentions.

As a follow-up to this operation, Thomas badgered the Editor in New York to get in touch with an operative who later turned out to go by the nickname ‘The Visitor’, who used the name Walker as an alias, but who’s real (Ukrainian) name is Demchuk. This operative was said to have Pentagon links. At fist the Editor refused, but Gordon Thomas (as agent for MI-6) persisted, and finally the Editor agreed to meet this fellow, by appointment (arranged via Hushmail) in the fishing tackle area of a sports store on Fifth Avenue. The Editor has no interest in sport and had never been inside a sports store. However at the appointed hour, the Editor appeared, and found this man lurking in the traditional grey raincoat amid the fishing rods. We repaired to the Algonquin Hotel, where the operative proceeded to pump the Editor on one subject alone, namely Lt. Mark Delmart Vreeland.

Subsequently, Demchuk pestered the Editor to reveal all he knew about the Iraqi ‘Sarindar’ WMD removal programme, under which two Soviet ships had sailed from the Iraqi port of Umm Qasr in February 2002, ahead of the illegal invasion. The Editor had obtained information on this from open sources, especially the high-level Romanian defector, Ion Pacepa, and additionally from Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU), some information about which is available on the Internet.

In other words, the information supplied to this ‘US’ operative by the Editor was all obtained from open sources. The operative ordered a number of our publications which he said he would pay for, received them, but later vanished without fulfilling his financial undertaking (par for the course).

In March 2005, the Editor suddenly received a phone call from this Pentagon-linked operative in London, in which he spoke immediately about some operation in Monaco involving the dubious operative Bernie Ecclestone. The US operative appeared to assume that the Editor knew what he was talking about, as he gave the Editor to understand that he (Demchuk) believed that the Editor was involved with whatever operation in Monaco (a key CIA center) he was talking about. When the Editor said: ‘I have no idea what you are talking about. You’d better go back to your source’, there was a very long and stony silence.

He then said: ‘Well, that’s very surprising, in view of where this comes from’. Since the Editor knew from another source that Demchuk had just visited MI-6, it almost immediately became crystal clear that this was yet another attempt by MI-6 to ‘sting’ the Editor of this service.

In view of the fact that a US ‘inside’ source told a contact of the Editor’s in February 2010 that ‘MI-6 intend to take Story out’, because he knows too much about what is going on (and what they are up to), we place the foregoing information on the record again: and we will revisit these sequences with greater, hitherto unpublished, detail, in due course.

If the British intelligence community thinks it can intimidate a private publisher whose sole interest is to expose the racketeering that these people are all trying to cover up, it had better think again. You could argue that what we have done to date has actually assisted the British authorities to get their acts together in the face of this unprecedented crisis: but to be informed, after going through so much, that they intend to ‘take Story down’, is one slap in the face too many: and it reflects very badly on the US source of this disgraceful threat and further intimidation attempt, as well.

For the elimination of all residual doubt, we will persist with these exposures until such time as the necessary remedial measures have been taken. Interestingly, as you will have noted appended to this report (Appendix), Lord Myners, the City (of London) Minister in the Labour Government, has just indicated that the measures taken to discipline the City have been quite inadequate to date – although he fails to use words like ‘criminal’, ‘fraud’, ‘organised crime’, ‘racketeering’, ‘Fraudulent Finance’ etc: so he has a great deal of catching up (with us) to do.

(2): See the following reports on this website [Archive]:

• 9th January 2010: Text of the CMKM/CMKX lawsuit against the S.E.C.: Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx): Santa Ana, California. Subsequent to our posting the complete text of the Complaint immediately it had been filed, the text was also made available on the following link: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda

• 29th January 2010: Service of CMKM/CMKX $3.87 trillion suit vs. S.E.C.

• 07 February 2010: Legal moves to sue those blocking the Settlements

• 02 March 2010: S.E.C. Phantom Shares Fraud: New Intelligence

(3): See text of the letter from Mr A. Clifton Hodges, Attorney for the CMKM/CMKX victims, to the Office of the Attorney General for New York State, Mr Andrew Cuomo: report of 2nd March 2010.

(4): Wanta’s rôle, having served as courier between Bush Sr. and Gorbachëv, has always been to facilitate thefts and diversions of funds to George Bush Sr. (and Gorbachëv, given that the former Communist President is a partner with Bush Sr. in Deutsche AG., as explained in this and recent reports). This helps to explain why from time to time during these investigations, we have been told that ‘Bush Sr. considers the monies to belong to him’.

(5) A ‘Foreclosure Autopsy’ reporting service is available, for instance, from the following analyst:

Charles Wayne Cox
Certified Forensic Loan Analyst
Notary Public
131 Sutphen Street
Santa Cruz
California 95060
Telephone: 831-466 3440
Facsimile: 619-330 2379
Email: mailto:Charles@BayLiving.com
Website: www.ForensicLoanAnalyst.com

Charles Cox is recommended to the Editor personally by a friend of impeccable integrity who is also an expert on these issues, based in San Diego. Cox is a Para-Legal and a noted forensic expert on reading mortgage documents, serving lawyers to help their foreclosure clients. Our friend and correspondent wrote, when introducing Charles Cox: ‘Charles helped a friend of mine here in San Diego by reading his original Note and mortgage documents. Incredibly, the Note to the mortgage was made out to San Diego. Later, a copy from the County Recorder’s office showed that San Diego had been crossed out, and written in was ‘United Republic’.

The mortgage was done by a mortgage company in Colorado (now out of business) but was sold to Aurora which was owned by Lehman Brothers. Aurora is still the servicer on the loan, and my friend is suing them and requested through a qualified letter a copy of the original Note to show that they are the legal owners of the Note’.

(6): ‘Northern Rock’s Line in Excuses: Holding Paid-out Title Deeds for Five Years: A forensic analysis of how Northern Rock managed to hold on to title deeds belonging to a former mortgagor, with details of its conflicting excuses for non-performance’: International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York, Numbers 1 and 2, pages F-153 to F-172.

(7) ‘Securitization is completely illegal and fraudulent under US law’, Economic Intelligence Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York, pages 5-21.

(8): ‘Gensler Turns Back on Wall Street to Push Derivatives Overhaul’,
Bloomberg, 12th February 2010.

(9): ‘Gensler Turns Back on Wall Street to Push Derivatives Overhaul’,
Bloomberg, op. cit., 12th February 2010.

(10) ‘January 2010 News and Information for DTCC customers’ published
by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation’, accessed 13th February 2010.

(11): The derivatives data maintained by the Bank for International Settlements, and reproduced by the International Monetary Fund in successive issues of its literature, are the only ‘reliable’ data available. Because they are issued by the BIS, they are authoritative, but it is not known whether they are accurate. The BIS data, which exclude double counting, showed that in June 2008, total Notional Over-the-Counter derivatives contracts outstanding on that basis reached some $693,814 billion. By December 2008, this total had contracted to $547,371 billion given the discontinuity of September 2008; but by June 2008, the total outstanding had recovered to $604,622 billion.

The Gross Market value of total underlying derivatives contracts outstanding amounted to $20.4 trillion in June 2008. $32.2 trillion in December 2008, and $25.4 trillion in June 2009.

(12): ‘January 2010 News and Information for DTCC customers’ published
by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation’, op. cit., accessed 13th February 2010.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time AMENDING AND INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE. In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

GORBACHEV IMPLICATED IN STEALING COTTRELL’S CONTRACT

story3

THE TOP GANGSTERS EXPOSED: GORBACHEV, KOHL, BUSH SR., ACKERMANN

Thursday 4 February 2010 05:01

WITH DEUTSCHE AG PARTNERS HELMUT KOHL, BUSH SR., AND ACKERMANN, GORBACHEV ALSO BENEFITED FROM THEFT OF THE QUEEN’S GOLD AS A PARTNER IN DEUTSCHE AG

RACKETEERING THROUGH GERMANY BY GORBACHEV, KOHL, AND THE U.S. GANGSTERS
In the following analysis, everything starts coming decisively together. We now prove that former President Mikhail S. Gorbachev, working with former US President George H. W. Bush Sr., former German Chancellor Helmut Kohl and Dr Joseph Ackermann, all partners in Deutsche AG (formerly called Barrington Investment Group), Switzerland, stole a contract using the electronic tag to the securities account owned by Michael C. Cottrell’s Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., with Benchmark Securities, In., New Jersey, at a table-top meeting in Geneva on 7th October 2002 by the means described below, which included the electronic ‘forging’ of Mr Cottrell’s signature. This theft was preceded by seven related thefts from Mr Cottrell’s firm’s securities account, itemised below.

This means that former President Mikhail Gorbachev and former German Chancellor Helmut Kohl are financial criminals like George H. B. Bush Sr. and should be treated accordingly. Mr Gorbachev and Helmut Kohl have, as partners in Deutsche AG, by definition been profiting from the theft of Mr Cottrell’s contract and property, and also, as further revealed below, from proceeds from the theft of The Queen’s gold, which, we were informed at 1.15 am on 4th February 2010, have likewise been channelled through Deutsche AG, Switzerland. As of 2nd February 2010, The Queen’s gold had not been restored. [In view of what we allude to but cannot divulge below, this grim situation may have changed on 3rd February, but we don’t know whether this is the case, yet].

• The proceeds of innumerable corrupt transactions involving these characters have been run through the DVD’s main institutions, Deutsche Bank and Dresdner Bank. So what is being exposed is that George H. W. Bush Sr. (CIA/DVD) and Mikhail Gorbachev (Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) and KGB/FSB) have been ransacking American and non-American victims alike, and running this colossal open-ended racketeering through Germany, with the assistance of the former STASI of East Germany (who are GESTAPO in relabelled clothing). Hence the presence on the scene of STASI operatives such as Eva Teleki, a Swedish opera singer, and other operatives suspected of being continuing STASI agents, such as Chancellor Angela Merkel (the former Secretary of the Agitation and Propaganda Department of the Young Communists at Marx Lenin University, in East Berlin). This explains why Merkel was earlier fingered by this service as guardian in Germany of George Bush Sr.’s stolen and exploited racketeering assets with German institutions.

• Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, who is a senior Soviet GRU operative, was based in East Germany before he migrated to Leningrad, and is believed to have been responsible for orchestrating, at least from the Soviet side, the clockwork ‘collapsible communism’ operations in Eastern Europe. Gorbachev has been reported to us to operate from a large wing of the Kremlin, as though he never left the place. Which he didn’t. He’s been at the centre of this criminality THROUGHOUT.

• Leo Wanta, who answers the phone in German, was the courier between George H. W. Bush Sr. and Mikhail Gorbachev. Although he says he’s Polish, we think this felon and fraudster (who has stolen this Editor’s loan plus interest) may be a DVD operative/double agent, possibly STASI.

• Note: It is standard CIA ‘tradecraft’ practice to usurp the expertise of outside professional talent if it is not available in-house or by some other means. In this context, the CIA perpetrators needed a US securities expert with impeccable credentials and a securities account. What the CIA does is apply its standard Bush-style ‘bait and switch’ technique, exploiting and maximising the potential of the usurped professional expertise, before rejecting it and stealing the assets associated with it.

That’s what happened to Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. This procedure also explains Wanta’s ‘use’ of Mr Cottrell for his failed AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. operation, because Mr Michael C. Cottrell has the requisite securities market expertise and account facilities, which were applied for the benefit of Mr Wanta. Note also that Steven Goodwin, the Wanta Attorney in Richmond, VA, who accepted this Editor’s $35,000, which Wanta stole, was born, as stated previously, in Dusseldorf.

• ‘BLAIR AND BERNANKE REPORTEDLY ARRESTED ON 3RD FEBRUARY’
It was reported to us at 1:00am on 4th February 2010 that the forgoing were both ARRESTED on Wednesday 3rd February 2010: see below for outline details. BREAKING.

• TWO GIANT WHITE HOUSE THEFTS THEY’VE LIVED TO REGRET

• STEALING THE QUEEN’S GOLD, COTTRELL’S CONTRACT (PLUS CMKX)

• MORE ABOUT JEB BUSH’S APPEARANCE AT THE WHITE HOUSE

• WHITE HOUSE THEFTS FROM MICHAEL C. COTTRELL’S FIRM,
AND THE ELECTRONIC FORGING OF HIS SIGNATURE

• GORBACHEV AND KOHL IMPLICATED WITH BUSH SR. AND ACKERMANN

• DEUTSCHE BANK AG A CO-CONSPIRATOR WITH BUSH JR. AND CHENEY

• BLAIR AND BERNANKE REPORTED TO US TO HAVE BEEN ‘ARRESTED’

• THE NOOSE HAS TIGHTENED AND THE TRAPDOOR IS POISED TO FALL

• CRIMINAL OPS. WITHIN A ‘RULE OF LAW’ FRAMEWORK

• SHOCKS PENDING FOR PEOPLE WHO FANCY THEY HAVE ‘STELLAR REPUTATIONS’

• LIES AND DIVERSIONARY PLOYS OVER WORLD COURT JURISDICTION

• THE THEFT OF THE QUEEN’S GOLD AND THE LIEN ON THE U.S. TREASURY

• U.S. TREASURY IS THE DEFENDANT IN THE WORLD COURT ACTION

• ELECTRONIC JAMMING OF GOLD THEFT PHONE CONVERSATION

• GERMANY IS BEING PROGRESSIVELY EXPOSED AS THE ENEMY

• NON MERCI! IL FAUT TOUT D’ABORD QUE VOUS VOUS DEBARRASSEZ DES ALLEMANDS

• SCANDAL OF WALL-TO-WALL U.S. OFFICIAL PSY-OPS AGAINST AMERICANS

• C.I.A. SCAMS INSIDE GOVERNMENT AS WELL AS THE PRIVATE SECTOR

• ‘SORCHA FAAL’ WARMONGERING’ AGITPROP OPERATION
RUN BY AN OFFICE OF NAVAL INTELLIGENCE AGENT FROM VIENNA, VA

• WHY THE EAVESDROPPERS ROUTINELY SHOOT THEMSELVES IN THEIR CLUB FEET

• THE HIDEOUS FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC ‘SHOCKS’ IN STORE

• THE LATEST AVAILABLE DERIVATIVES NOTIONAL VALUE DATA

• CONGRESS SLAPPED IN THE FACE AS WELL: BY NEIL BAROFSKY

• FOR ‘FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEMS’ READ: RAMPANT CRIMINALITY

• BANKERS AT DAVOS REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN AT LOGGERHEADS

• U.S. CROOKS REPORTED TO BE FLEEING THE COUNTRY

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

Note: If the current report [4th February 2010] is displayed, access the Archive for immediate display of our CMKM/CMKX report dated 29th January. All preceding reports, at least back to December, are also relevant to the current state of tension brought about by these gangsters.

• And note that this report EXPANDS our understanding for WHO has been involved all along.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

MORE ABOUT JEB BUSH’S APPEARANCE AT THE WHITE HOUSE
In our report dated 31st January, referencing the appearance of Jeb Bush at the White House on Saturday 30th January accompanying Godfather Bush Sr., we stated as follows: ‘Furthermore, the reason Jeb Bush suddenly surfaced was that Jeb Bush was involved when the Delmarva funds were stolen in August 2002. It will be recalled that Jeb was on record earlier as protecting his own interests under the smokescreen of the lie that his father was too gaga to know what he was doing, which has always been baloney. So Jeb has been caught too’.

The underlying facts here, which are central to the state of affairs reached at the end of January 2010 and which explain Jeb Bush’s sudden surfacing at the White House, as well as his sombre appearance when photographed leaving the official residence in a snowstorm, are as follows:

(1): Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. had served as a Trustee of Delmarva Timber Trust
and remains a Trustee of the Trust.

(2): In 2002, given Mr Cottrell’s status as a Delmarva Timber Trust Trustee and his security and background check credentials, Mr Michael C. Cottrell’s corporation Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.,
had been offered a contract to trade $500 billion by Deutsche Bank AG.

(3): This contract was stolen from Mr Cottrell’s computer, complete with his signature and passport image and details, by specific instructions of Dr Joseph Ackermann’s co-partner in Deutsche AG (formerly Barrington Investment Group), George Bush Sr., and his criminalist associates, Richard B. Cheney and George W. Bush Jr. between 19th August and 7th October 2002, using the National Security Agency (NSA) T-2 program. Mr Cottrell’s signature was ‘forged’ in the sense that it was lifted from his computer and used to seal the consequent illegal transactions accruing for the benefit of Gorbachev, Kohl and Bush. Further details of these thefts, will be found below.

(4): On 19th August 2002, Jeb Bush attended a meeting with Delmarva Timber Trust personnel, the subject matter of that meeting being how Delmarva could make a deal with George H. W. Bush Sr. and with George W. Bush.

(5): In our brief reference above and in our report dated 31st January 2010, the statement that ‘the Delmarva funds were stolen’ contained a misunderstanding by the Editor. It was funds deposited in a securities account belonging to Mr Cottrell’s Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., that were stolen, by means of the electronic ‘forging’ of Michael Cottrell’s signature, on the specific instructions of the Bushes and Cheney, from the White House. Mr Cottrell had been offered the contract by Deutsche Bank given his Delmarva Timber Trust background and his securities credentials.

WHITE HOUSE THEFTS FROM MICHAEL C. COTTRELL’S FIRM,
AND THE ELECTRONIC FORGING OF HIS SIGNATURE
As BREAKING EVENTS are showing, this was a fatal theft too far by the DVD’s Bush Crime Family and their lackey, MK-ULTRA operative Richard B. Cheney.

Deutsche Bank had been more than content to approve the securities market credentials of Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. a Delmarva Trust Trustee, with rollovers and extensions. His firm’s securities account was held within Benchmark Securities, Inc., New Jersey. Deutsche Bank had concluded that he was the ONLY American they would be prepared to consider for the intended trading purposes; and after they had checked him and his credentials out, they were delighted and so approved him for the $500 billion contract.

Funds had been procured and tagged to Pennslyvania Investments Inc.’s securities account within Benchmark Securities Inc., New Jersey, for the purpose of using the funds with the contract.

Between 19th August 2002 and 7th October 2002, the Bush II White House, using the National Security Agency’s T-2 program, fraudulently ‘pinged’ Michael C. Cottrell’s securities account on seven separate occasions. The perpetrators were consequently able to purchase several billion dollars’ worth of contract paper on each occasion.

At the end of this exercise, at a table-top meeting in Geneva on 7th October 2002, they activated the electronic tag to access the contract enabling them to steal the contract for Deutsche AG and the funds in Pennsylvania Investments Inc.’s securities account within Benchmark Securities Inc.

In order for them to achieve these thefts, Michael C. Cottrell’s signature was electronically copied for the purpose – the electronic equivalent of forgery of the principal’s signature. Therefore, in addition to conspiracy to commit theft, and to the thefts themselves, the criminals concerned, who include Mikhail Gorbachev and Helmut Kohl, perpetrated forgery as well.

GORBACHEV AND KOHL IMPLICATED WITH BUSH SR. AND ACKERMANN
As previously reported, partners in Deutsche AG, formerly Barrington Investment Group, include Dr Joseph Ackermann, the DVD’s main banker, George H. W. Bush Sr., Helmut Kohl, the former Chancellor of Germany, and former President Mikhail Gorbachev, all of whom, therefore, are co-conspirators in perpetrating the theft implemented in Geneva on 7th October 2002.

Former President Mikhail Gorbachev and former German Chancellor Helmut Kohl have shared the proceeds accruing to their partnership in Deutsche AG (formerly Barrington Investment Group), so Gorbachev and Kohl are identified as having STOLEN THE CONTRACT AND FUNDS BELONGING TO MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S., elaborated above.

DEUTSCHE BANK AG. A CO-CONSPIRATOR WITH BUSH JR. AND CHENEY
Also implicated were George W. Bush (Jr.), Richard B. Cheney and Cheney’s aide, Libby. Since Deutsche Bank had approved Michael C. Cottrell’s credentials as stated above, in allowing these illegal transactions to go through on the basis of an electronically stolen (and therefore forged) version of Mr Cottrell’s signature, Deutsche Bank itself became a co-conspirator, with Deutsche AG and its partners, in these successive thefts and exploitations of the funds which had been placed with Mr Cottrell’s securities account at Benchmark Securities, Inc., New Jersey.

The named highest-level US perpetrators, who erroneously imagined that they are covered by the National Securities Act of 1947 et seq. and are accordingly ‘licensed’ to abuse their high offices by committing theft, fraud and forgery, then intimidated and bore false witness against Mr Cottrell and arranged for the FBI to utter threats against him. Specifically, on 2nd October 2002, FBI Special Agent Jan Trigg and FBI Special Agent O’Grady [telephone number: 718-286 7307] telephoned Mr Cottrell at 3:44pm, accused HIM of conducting fraudulent transactions, and accompanied this lie with threats. In reality, the fraudulent transactions were being conducted by George H. W. Bush Sr., Richard B. Cheney, President George W. Bush and their foreign high-level partners.

BLAIR AND BERNANKE REPORTED TO US TO HAVE BEEN ‘ARRESTED’
At 1.00 am UK time on this date, 4th February 2010, the Editor was informed that the following were arrested on 3rd February 2010:

• Tony Blair, former British Prime Minister.

• Dr Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board

• Please note that the foregoing statement IS ACCURATE. CONSTRUE what has just been stated: The Editor was informed by transatlantic telephone at the time and date stated here, of the above arrests. This, we repeat, is 100% ACCURATE as presented to you. That’s what we’ve been told.

• Note: The possible ‘cover’ for the arrest of Blair may have been the fact that when the respected former British Labour Government Cabinet Minister, Clair Short, testified on 2nd February 2010 at the Chilcot Inquiry into whether Britain’s participation in the Iraq War was illegal, she denounced Blair as a liar, deceiver and con artist. Specifically, Ms. Short stated that Blair lied to his Cabinet and misled Britain’s Parliament over the Iraq War, accusing Blair of personally ‘conning’ her and of ‘deceiving the Cabinet, Parliament and the public’. Ms. Clare Short said that when she tried to question the legal case for war in Cabinet, she was jeered at, and Blair told her to ‘be quiet’. [Sources: Daily Telegraph, 3rd February 2010, page 12; The Times, 3rd February 2010, page 14].

• At 1.15 am UK time on this date, 4th February 2010, the Editor was informed that two top MI-6 personnel travelled to the United States to supervise matters currently in hand.

• The Editor was also informed of travel arrangements to the United States concerning a top personage but chooses to withhold this information at this time.

THE NOOSE HAS TIGHTENED AND THE TRAPDOOR IS POISED TO FALL
Of course what has happened is that due to their criminal greed in general, and as a consequence of this colossal theft in particular, involving the electronic ‘forging’ of Mr Cottrell’s signature, it has been possible to turn the tables on these careless and overconfident gangsters – with the noose being tightened progressively round their necks by stages.

• They are now metaphorically standing on the platform, with the executioner poised beneath them ready to shift the lever to open the trapdoor into which they will be dropped.

You may well ask yet again why have these people not been arrested in front of the TV cameras – as so many furious observers, including ourselves, have understandably been demanding. Among reasons for this not happening, we suppose, are included feeble fears for the future of the dollar system and the Republic; but the most likely generic reason for this not happening to date has been an unwarranted expectation by almost all elements within the US structures involved in the criminality and in covering it up, that they would all get away with everything in the end, given that their criminalist foreign associates are such big names.

• WE DON’T THINK SO…

CRIMINAL OPS. WITHIN A ‘RULE OF LAW’ FRAMEWORK
The real opposition has not crumbled – highlighting the central problem that these organised gangsters face, which can be summarised as follows:

• On the one hand, they have ‘successfully’ and comprehensively subverted the Rule of Law, the financial system, the domestic and world economies, the US intelligence community, many other intelligence communities and governments, the US military, elements of the US judiciary and law enforcement, and Wall Street. You would have thought that this would be more than enough to guarantee these gangsters open-ended ‘success’ for ever more, wouldn’t you.

• Yet on the other hand, since EVERYTHING they do is illegal, criminal or borderline ditto, and since they lie through their teeth and have to continue lying through their teeth because each successive lie has to be propped up with further lies, they recognise that they must operate within what remains of the Rule of Law and the judicial system that they despise. Otherwise they wouldn’t get their lies so entangled, and they wouldn’t go to such lengths (such as citing ‘national security’ as cover for criminal activity) to cover up their endless criminal behaviour.

As was inevitable given their overconfidence and the web of conflicting lies with which they are strangling themselves, the residual Rule of Law and the judicial system have caught up with these inveterate gangsters. We know for a fact that ‘they’ never expected that the lawyers acting for the CMKM/CMKX Plaintiffs [see Archive reports dated 9th January and 29th January] would actually FILE their devastating Complaint requesting monetary payment of $3.87 trillion given the floatation of an estimated 2.0 to 2.25 trillion phantom CMKM/CMKX shares from within the SEC itself.

However the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Mary L. Schapiro, has been served with the Summons, and the other defendants have been or are about to be served their Summonses, as well.

SHOCKS PENDING FOR PEOPLE WHO FANCY THEY HAVE ‘STELLAR REPUTATIONS’
Given updated indications of failure hitherto to perform across the board financially, subpoenas are pending against individuals whose careers and ‘stellar reputations’, whether hospitalised or not, will be abruptly terminated as a consequence.

• Ignoring Summonses is not an option. Such behaviour would ensure summary judgment against the defendants, probably associated with jail sentences for contempt of court.

LIES AND DIVERSIONARY PLOYS OVER WORLD COURT JURISDICTION
Meanwhile a routine old lie that is being revived in order to obfuscate the desperate plight facing the gangsters, is that the World Court has no jurisdiction in the United States. This obfuscation has been trotted out for years, and is being irresponsibly promulgated by some disruptive US websites. Like parallel spurious ‘Black’ propaganda with similar cover-up intent, this reiterated assertion is both irrelevant and malicious. Readers are misled by such diversions, perpetrated by operatives who are perfectly well aware of the true situation, and are deliberately instructed to cover it up. In what follows, we have no choice but to mingle geopolitical analysis based on our deep experience, with the necessary financial and gold information. You can extract the financial and gold information from the analysis, and it will stand unaffected as precisely described here.

THE THEFT OF THE QUEEN’S GOLD AND THE LIEN ON THE U.S. TREASURY
Underlying facts associated with the World Court lien against the US Treasury reported by this service include the following, and concern the theft of The Queen’s gold on 29th-30th March 2007. Contrary to what we were led to believe later in 2007, this matter has NOT been rectified, according to the most recent information obtained from US inside (official) sources and passed to this Editor at about 7:00pm UK time on 3rd February.

• Therefore, The Queen’s gold has remained STOLEN now for the best part of TWO years.
[Note: We are not able to discuss this matter beyond what is published here].

This scandalous state of affairs has been deliberately exploited by the large pan-German Nazi Fifth Column in the United States as a wedge to destroy the British Monarchy and to create tension and confusion between the two wings of the ‘Main Enemy’ (as the continuing Nazis and their covert Soviet associates see us), Britain and the United States. The ultimate objective is to destroy what remains of the Anglo-US Alliance – to drive a wedge between the two countries, and this operation which is far advanced. It is now being comprehensively THWARTED.

(1): On 20th-30th March 2007, a highest-level US criminal intelligence operation serving the interests of the pan-German Fifth Column was mounted to steal gold belonging to the British Monarchical Power. As indicated, it is a primary objective of the ongoing pan-German Nazi ‘Black’ counterintelligence apparatus, Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD), the heirs of the Abwehr – before whom Chancellor Angela Merkel, genuflects – to destroy the British Monarchy.

The British Monarchy provides national stability and stands in the way of the completion of the pan-German long-range strategy for hegemony in Europe and beyond. Even more to the point here, the British Monarchical Power is the ONLY power standing for the true Rule of Law – the ONLY power standing firm in the face of the ‘Black’ forces bent on thrusting the world into irretrievable chaos, not least by continuing ad infinitum their Fraudulent Finance operations.

• That’s why the Monarchy is targeted as described

(2): On Friday 29th March 2007, British banking system went ‘dead’ – such that the Editor of this service, who attempted a small VISA Credit card transaction in Victoria Street, London SW1, that afternoon, was unable to complete the transaction. When the Editor made some enquiries, it later transpired that Credit Card transactions had failed across the board in the United Kingdom. Further enquiries eventually yielded the following astonishing state of affairs:

(3): The banking ‘blackout’ extending into Saturday 30th March 2007 (separately confirmed to us, incidentally, by top Westminster political sources on 13th December 2008, and on subsequent occasions, the most recent of which, as noted, was 3rd February 2010), was used as ‘Blackout’ cover for the stealing of gold belonging to the British Monarchical Power.

This theft forms part of the basis for the action taken, in collaboration with Chinese parties, by agents for the British Monarchical Power against the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve, resulting in the lien for $47 trillion on the US Treasury referenced in some of our earlier reports. This lien is in force and has not yet been discharged (although this may be ‘in process’).

• As a consequence, the United States is temporarily not sovereign, a state of affairs that will unfortunately remain the case until this matter is resolved.

(4): By early May 2007, research conducted by this service had confirmed that a massive theft of gold directed from the highest levels of the criminal US Government structures (in conformity with the long-range pan-German strategy to destroy the British Monarchical Power) had indeed been secretly perpetrated on 29th-30th March 2007. On 15th May 2007, the Editor happened to mention to a US party that US criminalists had stolen The Queen’s gold. The person retorted that ‘I find that hard to believe’ and the Editor replied: ‘In that case, as you don’t believe what I say, don’t ever contact me again’. This conversation was recorded by the eavesdroppers, disrupting certain operations being conducted against the Editor of this service.

(5): At 1:45pm UK time on Tuesday 2nd February 2010, the Editor was engaged in a transatlantic telephone conversation with Michael C. Cottrell B.A., M.S., in which the Editor had raised the issue of ongoing attempts by controlled websites to obfuscate the jurisdiction of the World Court in the United States (an old diversionary ‘line’). As this matter was being reviewed, Mr Cottrell said:

‘They stole The Queen’s gold in London, not in the United States. Hence she can prosecute them under the British anti-terrorism legislation’.

(6): As soon as Mr Cottrell had said ‘They stole The Queen’s gold’, the transatlantic phone call was heavily jammed electronically by eavesdroppers. [See our observations about the stupidity of the eavesdroppers, below]. Every time they do this, they simply confirm the accuracy of what is being discussed. It was just possible for us to conclude the conversation above the din, and the Editor therefore managed to add that, thanks to this further confirmation (now afforded by the electronic jamming), the matter of the stealing of the gold in 2007 would be revisited by this column.

• The theft of The Queen’s gold was discussed internally in the United States on 3rd February 2010, and as indicated above, the Editor was susbequently informed that this matter remained outstanding and had NOT been resolved.

(7): Two of the actual criminal events which have given rise to this crisis and to the lien, took place in Europe: in London (the stealing of The Queen’s gold) and also in The Netherlands (the operation against ABN Amro). Thus BOTH criminal events afford the British Monarchical Power jurisdiction under British and European anti-terrorism legislation, which embraces ALL financial criminality – providing a further reason why our description of the US high-level operatives and gangsters as Financial Terrorists, is accurate. The relevant British and European anti-terrorism legislation is believed to have been duly invoked.

(8): Proceeds from the trading of The Queen’s gold have been systematically channelled, we now understand, through Deutsche AG (formerly Barrington Investment Group, Switzerland), which of course means that Messrs Gorbachev, Kohl, Bush Sr, Ackermann, et al, HAVE PROFITED FROM THE STEALING OF THE QUEEN’S GOLD. Hence, they are themselves criminal Financial Terrorists.

U.S. TREASURY IS THE DEFENDANT IN THE WORLD COURT ACTION
Since the United States is the defendant in this (and the Chinese) World Court case(s), World Court jurisdiction most definitely applies in the United States, contrary to the mischievous disinformation being recycled for obfuscatory purposes, by US agents of influence who have been so instructed. The World Court is, moreover, an offshoot of the United Nations, arising from the Bretton Woods Agreements. The World Court also has an American Justice; and enforcement, auditing and other relevant personnel associated with this World Court matter were indeed sworn in at the US Justice Department at the beginning of December 2009, as we reported – given that it is necessary under international law for foreign personnel engaged in enforcement of World Court orders to be sworn-in on the soil of the defendant country.

ELECTRONIC JAMMING OF GOLD THEFT PHONE CONVERSATION
It was clear from the electronic jamming which interfered with the foregoing transatlantic telephone conversation that US electronic intelligence services wished this matter to be suppressed. In view of what is transpiring in ‘real time’ as this report is being finalised, their anxiety is understandable. But precisely because of that intervention, we are hereby taking this opportunity to lay out the facts more fully than before, as known to us – bearing in mind that this service exposed the gold theft in 2007, within a matter of weeks after that assault by Germany’s agents within the US structures against the British Monarchical Power.

You may now perhaps understand why, outraged at this development, we then called for the US Ambassador to be recalled from London, for him to be ordered to procure the rectification of this assault within a specified period, and in the absence of any progress within two months, for the US Embassy to be closed and US bases operating on British territory to be evacuated.

Of course, given innumerable other considerations, we did not expect any of this to happen: but strong language needed to be used in order to convey, to those with ears to hear, the extreme gravity of the situation, and to advertise the theft which no-one else (of course) was reporting.

GERMANY IS BEING PROGRESSIVELY EXPOSED AS THE ENEMY
Because Britain is enmeshed in the sterile European Union Collective – the long-range pan-German hegemony collectivisation operation mapped out under Hitler and delineated in the compendium Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft, published in Berlin in 1942, which we have extensively exposed elsewhere [in particular in The New Underworld Order], it is still taboo to describe Germany as THE ENEMY.

• But there is no doubt whatsoever that this is an accurate statement.

In the European sphere, France covers for Germany under the terms of the Treaty of the Elysée (January 1963), which is of indefinite duration and provides for both sides to reach ‘an analogous position’ in respect of all external matters of common interest.

The indefinite treaty was signed by the duplicitous General Charles de Gaulle, no friend of Britain despite his exile in London during the war, and Dr Konrad Adenauer, the former Hitler-era mayor of Cologne, and friend of Hitler’s favourite German bankers, Drs. Abs and Pferdmenges. New plans to integrate dimensions of the French with the British military structures, reportedly being discussed within the British official circles, appear to overlook these fundamental considerations – given that British policy remains dominated by brainwashed, second-rate people who do not understand, are ignorant of, or refuse to accept, the reality that long-range pan-German DVD strategy is viscerally opposed to the continued existence of Britain as an independent country – just as it is focused on building ‘the Thousand-Year Reich on the ruins of the United States’.

NON MERCI! IL FAUT TOUT D’ABORD QUE VOUS VOUS DEBARRASSEZ DES ALLEMANDS
The current wheeze in London is that a new revival of the Edwardian ‘entente cordiale’ would be appropriate, given Britain’s weakened position following the corruption of elements of the City of London by the DVD-serving Bush-worshipping George Bush Center for Intelligence, Langley, VA.

Such a démarche should not even be contemplated unless and until France denounces and exits from the 1963 Treaty of the Elysée with Germany. Otherwise further entanglement with France will simply mask further lethal entanglement with the long-range subversion strategy implemented by the secret pan-Germans – which the prevailing financial showdown is, at least, destabilising.

The offensive against Britain and the British Monarchy is being directed from three centres: Germany (Dachau) itself; the Germanophile component of the subversive Bush-corrupted US Intelligence Power; and Germany’s wartime ally, Japan, also known to be targeting British power, which is extensively centred within the British Monarchical Power.

A constant campaign of vituperative venom, very typical of familiar old Nazi hate propaganda, is disseminated via several notorious US websites – with no tangible impact other than to confuse Americans who do not possess access to the underlying accurate information, or who want their prejudices reinforced. These cynical CIA/DVD Psy-Ops activities are leading nowhere, given the prevailing ‘evolution of events’ (to cite Lenin); but are cruelly misleading Americans who deserve better than to be constantly lied to by operatives working for the criminalised Intelligence Power which is itself an instrument of foreign interests.

SCANDAL OF WALL-TO-WALL U.S. OFFICIAL PSY-OPS AGAINST AMERICANS
The barrage of disinformation directed at well-meaning Americans by evil elements within the US official structures is, of course, an ongoing scandal of immense proportions which no-one in the United States seems to be interested in addressing. People with influence and contacts that we know well, seem to accept this state of affairs as perfectly normal. It is NOT in any way normal for a Government to deploy crude Psy-Ops specialists and agents of influence whose job is to spew out disinformation and lies 24/7 for the specific purpose of deceiving and misleading its own people.

This abomination has matured from the poisonous Operation Mockingbird, the CIA’s Psy-Ops offensive against, and to subvert, the US media implemented during the Cold War period – with the covert aim of preventing the press from investigating embarrassing and criminal operations by the Intelligence Power itself as it consolidated its control over the US Federal Government structures behind the Cold War smokescreen – becoming far more of a menace than the GRU-KGB ever was.

This monstrous, self-financing, criminalised US ‘State within the State’ – which will tolerate no interference with its criminal operations, is responsible for perpetrating the biggest portfolio of criminal finance scams in history, and has absolutely no intention of reforming itself – is thought to have perpetrated three or more hidden giga-scams that are comparable in size to the incredible CMKM/CMKX phantom shares fraud that we have exposed on this website. We are aware of two comparable scams in the United States, and another in Canada (which has been comprehensively corrupted by the Bush Crime Syndicate operations there, FBI Division Five which sits inside the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the compromised Canadian intelligence community, and a number of well-known Canadian banks). The US Intelligence Power recognises no limitations to its arrogant abuse of the power that it has usurped from the American people and that it deploys to coerce and subjugate the Executive Branch, in particular.

C.I.A. SCAMS INSIDE GOVERNMENT AS WELL AS THE PRIVATE SECTOR
Enron was NOTHING compared to what is emerging as this monstrosity’s financial and related crimes – dancing to the tune of the Bush and Clinton DVD Crime sub-Syndicates of the George Bush Center for Intelligence, Langley (which in turn serves even darker interests identified at the top of this report) – are progressively being exposed.

For the US Intelligence Power has penetrated and subverted not just the Financial Sector, both at home and internationally – exporting its corruption abroad in order to escape the US monopolies and securities legislation, and maximising the potential for perpetrating ever more open-ended fraudulent finance operations at home under cover of the National Security Act of 1947 et seq. (a crooks’ charter) – but has, in parallel, exploited its entrée inside official structures, such as the SEC, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the CIA itself and the Pentagon (the Halliburton scamming operations) to perpetrate unspeakable frauds against targeted constituencies from inside the Government itself. After all, since the White House has for years been doing not a lot else but engage in open-ended corrupt financial operations, what’s the problem?

This abominable US Intelligence Power monstrosity needs to be decapitated, decimated, trampled under foot, and buried in concrete. Furthermore, when that imperative reform finally takes place, as it surely will – given the extreme shocks in store – not a single member of its corrupted staff should be ever eligible for re-employment in a new, slimmed-down US intelligence sector subject to proper checks and balances with very sharp teeth.

If you say this can’t happen, you have already fallen victim to a central ingredient of the cynical CIA Psy-Ops offensive that’s being waged at maximum intensity against the American people – namely, a defeatist mentality. They want you to think like that – because defeatism protects their continued illegitimate hegemony. But everything’s collapsing onto their heads now, we think.

FACT: These people CAN be defeated. Look what immense progress has been made since it ceased to be the case that they always got their own way. Further progress is being made every day, and the pace at which these people are being destabilised is rapidly accelerating. Remember: They never thought there could ever be any real opposition, so they weren’t prepared for it when it materialised: and they have been scared and on the defensive ever since.

The fact is, they don’t have the initiative, although they may kid themselves that they do: all of us who are standing up to these vermin, have the initiative. These CIA marionettes are spinning like tops. Many may wind up spinning in their graves or dangling from George H. W. Bush’s lamp posts. And an awful lot of people are likely to wind up in jail.

‘SORCHA FAAL’ WARMONGERING’ AGITPROP OPERATION
RUN BY AN OFFICE OF NAVAL INTELLIGENCE AGENT FROM VIENNA, VA
One egregious example of the contemporary manifestation of Operation Mockingbird, which we have exposed several times already in this column, is the fake so-called ‘Sorcha Faal’ operation.

These reports typically begin with the weasel phrase ‘Rumours circulating in the Kremlin today’ or else ‘Reports circulating in the Kremlin today’, for the purpose of conning the gullible reader into believing that he or she is reading inside information from Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) or the successors to the KGB (FSB). As the Editor of Soviet Analyst, the Editor of this service is naturally aware of the fact that, as we have said before, the Kremlin doesn’t ‘DO’ rumours. So it is incredible that such a naïve and uneducated ploy has any traction at all.

As we have stated on several occasions in the past, the ‘Sorcha Faal’ warmongering drivel – much of which agitates for a world war as soon as possible, it seems – is disseminated by an Office of Naval Intelligence operative named J. Forrest Sharpe, working out of Vienna, VA.

The Office of Naval Intelligence is one of the snakepits within the US Intelligence Power that has been most viciously scrabbling, for years, to control the money. Its warmongering agitation and propaganda is associated with the ‘War Party’ who imagine that the financial crisis can be buried beneath the rubble of a World War.

This is an extremely malicious disinformation operation serving the interests of a particularly nasty component of the US Intelligence Power: ONI has a reputation of being much the most ruthless and aggressively dangerous of the various CIA ‘subsidiary’ and competing entities which are often at loggerheads with each other.

On 2nd February 2010, the Editor of this service emailed David M. Dastych, a Polish journalist and ‘former’ intelligence operative based in Warsaw, to inform him of the above facts, given allusions to Sorcha Faal disinformation in one of his reports (although Mr Dastych was not in fact buying the line). At 17:06 UK time (same day), the Editor received this response from Mr Dastych:

Dear Mr Story

I’ve checked about J. Forrest Sharpe and his publications. You’re perfectly right, this ONI officer pretends to be “SORCHA FAAL” and his publications pretend to be from a “rumour mill” of the Kremlin and the Russian Intelligence [services] (GRU, FSB).

My respect.

David Dastych.

WHY THE EAVESDROPPERS ROUTINELY SHOOT THEMSELVES IN THEIR CLUB FEET
The incident at 1:45pm UK time on 2nd February, itemised above, when the mention of the stealing of The Queen’s gold in a transatlantic telephone call was immediately followed by loud electronic jamming (which however was not replicated when the Editor called back a few minutes later), is simply the latest in a long line of such interferences with our communications which have confirmed or reconfirmed elements of research on which we were working.

Of these incidents, the previously most important occasion was a conversation in 2006 between the Editor in London, Mr Wanta in Wisconsin and ‘Mr Nasty’ (Thomas Henry) in Nebraska, in which the Editor mentioned in a few words his analysis of pan-German long-range subversion strategy and its implementation against the ‘Main Enemy’ (Britain and the United States) by the Nazi-DVD.

This ‘unexpected’ observation by the Editor – based, by the way, on documentary evidence, as well as on ongoing research – was immediately greeted not by one, but by no less than THREE gasps – none of which were emitted by parties to the conversation. Bearing in mind that Wanta answers the phone with ‘Guten Tag’, this was ‘quite interesting’.

All our phone calls (domestic as well as international) are listened to, and one can hear the various despicable eavesdroppers clicking in one after the other. These people may not understand that this behaviour is not merely tacky and sordid: it also enables us to inform them what we want them to know. It’s a two-way street. They probably never thought of that.

THE HIDEOUS FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC ‘SHOCKS’ IN STORE
Finally, as we recently reported, the Barack Obama Administration will have the distinction of having presided over the accumulation of $4.5 trillion of Treasury ‘background’ debt – all of it wholly unnecessary – in the space of just two years. But it took from 1913 to 1994 for the US Treasury to incur Gross Federal Debt (as reported) of $4,643,307 million – and until 2005, if the Office of Management and Budget’s ‘smoke and mirrors’ device, mandated by Statute, whereby the surpluses in the so-called Trust Funds are ‘invested in’ the Federal Funds, is used as the measure.

Now as we have repeatedly stated, incurring this vast accumulation of new US ‘Trashets’ debt is wholly unnecessary, and therefore represents a further form of Financial Terrorism against the American people. Because if the Group of Seven-mandated Dollar Refunding Programme, requiring a regular calendar of fully taxable, transparent, on-the-books trades to take place on a continuing basis, had been implemented, the US Treasury Department would long since have been at the receiving end of a cascade of windfall tax receipts at 35% per trade – and wouldn’t have needed to have incurred much, or any, of this extra garbage debt at all.

Of course, implementation of this scheme would have, and will, knock out clandestine, off-balance sheet, tax-evasive derivatives trading, with the proceeds stashed in offshore bank accounts. But the proceeds from these discredited money laundering operations are basically stuck offshore anyway, and cannot be surfaced onto the balance sheet under Basel II and Basel III, except through crooked banks – making a laughable mockery of the observable persistent intent among bankers generally to try to rehabilitate fully the discredited derivatives mayhem.

THE LATEST AVAILABLE DERIVATIVES NOTIONAL VALUE DATA
To some extent, according to Bank for International Settlements data, the derivatives sector was somewhat restored in the first half of 2009 – given that, after peaking at $683,725 billion in June 2008, the notional derivatives contracts amount outstanding had ‘recovered’ to $604,622 billion by the end of June 2009 (taking account of double-counting) compared with the reported aggregate of $547,371 billion to which this notional figure had slumped by the end of December 2008.

That collapse had represented a notional value wipeout of no less than $136.4 trillion in the space of six months (actually, from mid-September to December 2008). In the first half of 2009, the notional value of derivatives contracts outstanding was clawed back up by $57.3 trillion, a 42% ‘recovery’ – indicating loud and clear that no lessons whatsoever had been learned from what happened, and that the financial community wasn’t inclined, even in the face of the massive slap in the face that it received from mid-September 2008 onwards, to go back to school.

CONGRESS SLAPPED IN THE FACE AS WELL: BY NEIL BAROFSKY
This is not only the view of our soundest advisers, but it is echoed by the only figure other than Paul Volcker within the Obama Firmament who has been talking any sense at all – namely, Mr Neil Barofsky, the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, whom the Obama Administration are obtusely ignoring.

As required by law, Mr Barofsky delivered a 224-page quarterly report to Congress on 30th January 2010, in which he yet again complained that Congress had been fiddling while Washington, DC, burned. US policymakers, he reiterated, had taken NO STEPS SO FAR to address the fundamental problem that triggered the financial crisis.

• Mr Barofsky did, however, reveal the small matter of 40-odd investigations into misappropriation of the $700 billion of TARP money (which was exactly what we had predicted in late 2008 when the criminal financier Paulson was orchestrating that operation). The $700 billion was leveraged to at least $23 trillion – which, by the way, belongs exclusively to the American people, as it’s ALL been stolen. ‘The money you make exploiting my money is my money’.

Specifically, Barofsky berated Congress, saying that ‘it is hard to see how any of the fundamental problems in the system have been addressed to date’. Echoing views expressed to us repeatedly by the securities expert, Michael C. Cottrell, Mr Barofsky elaborated that the bailout ‘will have been for naught if we do nothing to correct the fundamental problems in our financial system and [we will] end up in a similar or even greater crisis in two, or five, or ten years’ time’.

FOR ‘FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEMS’ READ: RAMPANT CRIMINALITY
However the ‘fundamental problems’ embrace rampant criminality inside the highest ranks of the US Federal Government, starting at the White House, the Treasury, the Federal Reserve and, of course, the criminalised Intelligence Power, which controls all three. The only progress that has been made in this connection has resulted from the determined opposition that the serpents have encountered not from within the Government’s own structures – but from beyond.

Like everyone else except this service, Mr Barofsky is unwilling to use straightforward words and phrases like ‘fraud’, scam’, ‘corruption’, ‘criminal finance’ – for fear of offending, in this context, US legislators who are themselves involved in clandestine money-laundering, tax evasion, Fraudulent Finance, and other manifestations of Financial Terrorism. We understand that when Paul Volcker testified before Congress on 3rd February 2010, it was possible to tell, from the questioning, which legislators had been bribed by Bernanke, Panetta, Geithner, or all of the above.

• And yes, as he can’t bring himself to use the appropriate vocabulary, Mr Barofsky naturally ALSO avoids mentioning Financial and Economic Terrorism altogether.

BANKERS AT DAVOS REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN AT LOGGERHEADS
The gravely damaged financial system, rotten to the core, and riddled with cancerworm, cannot be ‘repaired’ until the contemporary preference for Fraudulent Finance is cauterised first. Judging by reports of stand-up rows behind the scenes at bankers’ meetings in Davos, the self-destructing, complacent Wall Street, London, Paris, Zurich and Frankfurt élites, are losing their cool – as they contemplate the wreckage brought about by their own unfettered criminality and greed.

Yet by all accounts, their attitude is that any reforms that belatedly emerge from the US legislative process, and from the confused goings-on in London, they will be able to circumvent.

If that’s their attitude, Neil Barofsky’s two-year timeframe is much too optimistic. When inflation primed by this unprecedented outbreak of monetary waywardness and permissiveness takes off, the nitro-glycerine will be ignited – and the last chance to prevent a global calamity will have been squandered by these greedy money-lending opportunists, who have so far escaped scot-free from the consequences of their financial criminality (give or take their bonuses).

Two generations ago, these people would have been shot at dawn for speculation in time of war. They may fear that a similar fate awaits them ‘down the pike’ – so they may prefer to grab what they can now, before the destruction for which they and their criminalist associates in high places are responsible, drags them down to economic hell along with everyone else.

U.S. CROOKS REPORTED TO BE FLEEING THE COUNTRY
It is reported to us (as has been the case at tense stages of this crisis in the past) that criminal financiers are fleeing the United States – taking some of their loot with them. This time round, however, the reports have an urgency about them that we hadn’t noted on earlier occasions.

Fleeing abroad won’t do them much good, for two reasons. First, if they touch the funds, they will immediately be fingered. Secondly, they are just as likely, if not more so, to be picked up in Europe, than in the United States.

INTERPOL are on worldwide alert for these criminals, and the British and European anti-terrorism legislation has very nasty, sharp teeth. So come on over, folks: our cops will happily pick you up.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time AMENDING AND INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE. In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

STINKING C.I.A. CAULDRON EXPLODES IN THEIR FACES

chrisstory

HEIGHTENED TENSION AS THE RESISTANCE IS BATTERED

Wednesday 13 January 2010 04:30

BELTWAY STAGGERED BY EXPOSURE OF LINE-ITEM PROVISION AND THE $3.87 TRILLION CMKM/CMKX LAWSUIT AGAINST THE S.E.C. FOR ITS HUGE PHANTOM SHARE SCAM

• CHAOS WITHIN THE RANKS OF CIA DISINFORMATION OPERATIVES: Since this report was posted, the CIA lie factory’s obfuscation specialists have got themselves into an even worse mess than was evident prior to this posting. We have demonstrated what was always known, namely that these professional liars and disinformation artists are associates of the criminalised Intelligence Power. The CIA’s Public Sorcerer has failed to answer any of our probing questions, let alone reveal his/their identity(ies), thereby indicating that we must have hit more than one verruca.

And silly people are busily rewriting history, starting with the DC meeting in June 2002 which the Editor attended, where 30 portfolios of the Fed FINs were handed out, the place was pre-packed with operatives who all suddenly wanted to attend, and where Vanity Fair picked up a copy of the documents in question. On top of this, WICKED PEDIA, a controlled outlet which rewrites truth to suit the requirements of the Langley Lie Factory, has fouled a segment on this Editor, which he did not append himself, stating that what the Editor publishes is all false. That’s right: a publisher who has been in business for 40 years peddles deception. In the commercial world, which few of these nutcases inhabit, if you mess up, your business fails. Evidently some of these people have a frail grasp of reality. The good news, however is that our email traffic is laden with kind messages and good wishes, which the Editor greatly appreciates but unfortunately cannot answer individually.

• WHEN READING THIS NEW REPORT, PLEASE REFER TO THE FOLLOWING POSTINGS
ON THIS WEBSITE, all of which can be accessed immediately by pressing ARCHIVE:

• 28 December 2009:
OFFICIAL: MONEY SABOTEURS = ECONOMIC TERRORISTS

• 07 January 2010:
OPERATION STILLPOINT TO DESTROY AMERICA STOPPED

• 09 January 2010:
U.S. INTELLIGENCE POWER ‘STEALS $1.3++ TRILLION’

• 09 January 2010:
TEXT OF THE CMKM/CMKX LAWSUIT FILED AGAINST THE S.E.C.: CASE NUMBER CV10-00031-JVS (MLGx): ‘Money Demanded in Complaint: $3.87 trillion’: THIS IS THE BIGGEST FRAUDULENT FINANCE LAWSUIT IN HISTORY: MASSIVE SCAMMING PLATFORM RUN BY BUSH JR.’s S.E.C.

• 11 January 2010:
‘INTERPOL SEIZES MONEY DISTRIBUTION LAW FIRM DATA’

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

‘If you think you’re too small to make a difference,
try sleeping in a closed room with a mosquito’. African proverb.

• FOR SEVERAL YEARS WE HAVE CARRIED THIS RUBRIC AT THE FOOT OF EACH REPORT:

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice are comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor’s study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing global financial corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Just press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard. Or press the live Donate link at the top right-hand corner of this page. See also the ADVERTISEMENT below.

• See the SECOND WHITE PANEL ON THE HOME PAGE for updated information on our very latest subscription-based print publications, including Economic Intelligence Review, Arab-Asian Affairs, Soviet Analyst and Global Analyst. The updates provide outline summaries of the subjects covered, most of which are immediately relevant to these reports, which supplement the serials.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation, are appended at the foot of this report, below the legal data. See also our catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and our ‘politically incorrect’ intelligence books online from this website.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

• HOW TO READ THESE REPORTS

• THE LINE-ITEM PAYMENT AND THE $ REFUNDING

• SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS MONITORED ON 11TH AND 12TH JANUARY 2010

• WHAT THE REACTION TO OUR BULL’S-EYES HAS REVEALED

• THE LOUDER THE SCREAMS, THE DEEPER THE WOUND

• WHAT THE CIA’S PONZI SORCERER HAS BEEN SAYING

• HAS HE CONVICTED HIMSELF BY PROTESTING TOO MUCH?

• HOW THE CIA SORCERER CAN MITIGATE TROUBLING DOUBTS

• OPERATION STILLPOINT RUN BY THE SAME GANG THAT RAPED RUSSIA

• THE PUBLIC SORCERER AND HIS APPRENTICES

• IS THE PUBLIC SORCERER ENGAGED IN DECEPTION AND FRAUD?

• SOLUTIONS TO THE U.S. PONZI VICTIMS’ PROBLEM

• MAKING AN INDIVIDUAL COMPLAINT TO THE S.E.C.

• REGULARISATION OF THE PONZI VICTIMS’ STATUS

• AN INADVERTENT SMEAR, AND ANOTHER THREAT

• APPENDIX ONE:
THE FULL TEXT OF THE S.E.C. INSPECTOR GENERAL’S INTERVIEW WITH MADOFF AT THE METROPOLITAN CORRECTIONAL CENTER IN LOWER MANHATTAN ON 17TH JUNE 2009.

•APPENDIX TWO:
EXECUTIVE ORDER: 17th November 2009: ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FINANCIAL FRAUD ENFORCEMENT TASK FORCE

APPENDIX THREE:
President Obama Establishes Interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force: THE US JUSTICE DEPARTMENT’S PRESS RELEASE

HOW TO READ THESE REPORTS
Some people seem to encounter continued difficulty distinguishing between the message and the messenger. That is a familiar problem. Beyond that, some people read carelessly: they appear not to read carefully constructed sentences properly.

For instance, when we state that ‘it was reported to us at 5.30 pm UK time on a stated date that X, Y, Z occurred on such and such a date’, the statement is correct: what we are saying is that the matter in question WAS REPORTED TO US.

The same applies to headline statements in parentheses. When parentheses appear at the beginning and end of a headline, it means that this information is AS REPORTED.

Another problem some people appear to have is that they are impatient for instant corroboration of statements addressing intelligence issues which are by their nature hard to quantify. Since we are having to deal with highly sensitive banking and intelligence information (which, by definition, is supposed to be confidential and can ONLY be confirmed if we find out about it, never divulged by intelligence sources), bits and pieces of such data are typically leaked or obtained in a haphazard manner – the information stream is non-linear, i.e. it is chaotic.

This means that it is always possible that information AS REPORTED TO US was incomplete or slightly off-message for some reason or other – which does NOT invalidate the prior statement that the information was reported to us, which was what we stated. If we state that a matter was reported to us, that statement is by definition accurate.

It now appears that computers and computer data, or just computer data, were seized on the orders of INTERPOL from a prominent US law firm, because as a direct consequence of that development (our earlier report on which has not elicited any corporate response, doubtless because of a fear of stirring the choppy waters up further), and because we publicised the LINE-ITEM PAYMENT due to Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., as has been mandated by the World Court, the Bank for International Settlements and the British Monarchical Power – prevailing ongoing criminal deceptions, monetary diversion operations, scams and other ongoing abominations appear to have been stopped in their tracks on Monday 11th January 2010.

Instantaneous mass distribution of the $3.87 trillion CMKM/CMKX Court Case via our website caused further consternation inside the Beltway – as it had been thought possible to bury the case quietly somehow in the California Court, by means of the usual dishonest judicial manoeuvring.

THE LINE-ITEM PAYMENT AND THE $ REFUNDING
There is something else you need to know, which should be clear by now (after all, we have been spelling this out for a very long time). It is this. The referenced LINE-ITEM payment represents the necessary payment to trigger the transparent, fully taxable on-balance sheet US Dollar Refunding Operation mandated by the cited authorities.

This is ANATHEMA to the criminalised US Intelligence Power and all its accomplices, including the nasty piece or pieces of work calling himself or themselves Casper, hereinafter the CIA’s Public Sorcerer: because it spells curtains for the corrupted US Intelligence Power’s free-wheeling scamming and Fraudulent Finance operations both domestically and therefore to a considerable extent around the world. The stolen sovereign trillions must be disgorged.

No more Dubais and grandiose desert Towers of Babel can be built with the leveraged proceeds of hypothecation scams derived originally from the principal stolen from US and foreign Ponzi victims. The criminal intent had been to create a duplicate Manhattan in a tax-free zone thousands of miles from the US mainland, from where the Fraudulent Finance could proliferate to infinity.

That scenario is sinking into the sand, like the Burj Khalifa, which has already sunk, we understand, by 2.4 inches since it was erected.

Too bad, Richard B. Cheney. Too bad, you cynical, decayed Bushcrooks. Too bad, William Jefferson Rockefeller-Clinton and your duplicitous higher-level CIA wife, Jezebel. Your wicked game is over and your dirty bluff has been called. What is scandalous is that you and your criminal associates are still at large. You should all be behind bars in the GULAG, along with all your implicated financial enterprise colleagues – given the endless crimes that you have committed against your fellow countrymen and women, and the human lives you have wrecked. You swine.

SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS MONITORED ON 11TH AND 12TH JANUARY 2010
Certain irrevocable steps were taken on Monday 11th and Tuesday 12th January which we will now report on an ‘as reported to us’ basis [SEE ABOVE]. Bear in mind that, as indicated in the foregoing segment, the new information divulged here is presented AS REPORTED TO THIS SERVICE.

Message to people who have nothing better to do than to nit-pick at these reports: Have regard to the precise structure of the following sentences, and resist the knee-jerk temptation, please, to rush around trying to disprove what we say: if we hadn’t been told what we state, we wouldn’t be HELPING YOU at continuing risk to ourselves, by publishing the information:

• At about 8:30 pm on Monday 11th January 2010 it was reported to us that a number of further brutal horizontalisations and ‘disappearances’ had occurred throughout the preceding weekend. It had also separately been reported to us earlier that evening by an intermediary with Chicago-linked connections that such liquidations had in fact been taking placed for the past three weeks or so (as essentially reported earlier by this service).

• At about 8:40 pm on Monday 11th January 2010 it was reported to us that a certain US financial party known to have been involved in certain dubious transactions involving the US Treasury seemed ‘very nervous’, in contrast to his normal behaviour. A day later, the same party was again described to us as appearing to be ‘very nervous’.

• At 4:30 pm UK time on Tuesday 12th January 2010, it was reported to us that on the preceding day ‘there was trouble in Paris, at Paribas’ (where the Bush Crime Family’s associates controlled some 3,000 accounts in the past).

• At 4:30 pm UK time on Tuesday 12th January 2010, it was reported to us that the Chinese Lien Holders and the British Monarchical Power Lien Holder foreclosed on the US Treasury, which implies also the Federal Reserve (as the two are joined at the hip through TARP and TALF). We were told that whereas the Lien was ‘attached’ on or around 6th December 2009, actual foreclosure took place on Monday 11th January.

• At about 9:15 pm UK time on Tuesday 12th January 2010, it was reported to us that the Federal Reserve ‘made a profit’ of between $45 billion and $49 billion which is being transferred to the US Treasury. The figures may be much larger. The transfer reflects the ongoing audits performed by the previously mentioned ‘men in suits’ at the Fed.

• At about 9:20 pm UK time on Tuesday 12th January 2010, it was reported to us by sources that computer media concerning the financial Settlements, containing banking codes and relevant data, were removed from the previously mentioned law firm on INTERPOL’s instructions, either at the weekend, or on Monday.

• At 10:45 pm on Tuesday 12th January 2010 it was reported to us on the basis of intelligence information sourced from Europe that certain irrevocable measures were taken in Europe at 9:00 am London time which we are not permitted to report, requiring the Settlements transfers to be completed as mandated and required, as of Friday 15th January 2010.

• At 10:50 pm on Tuesday 12th January 2010 it was reported to us that the so-called ‘Connecticut Trustee’, Sigué, was sequestered, having again been caught lying and deceiving. Other Bush Sr.-linked payee parties (Trustees) are thought also to have been sequestered but we have been unable to obtain further information.

• At 10:52 pm on Tuesday 12th January 2010 it was reported to us that the consequences of non-compliance with completion and closure of the Settlements payments by the end of this week may be dramatic. We have been advised what the consequences may be but we choose at this juncture to refrain from revealing what we have been told. It’s too sensitive.

• At 1:05 am UK time on Wednesday 13th January 2010, it was reported to us that at 6:37 pm EST, the NBC Brian Williams Show had reported an earthquake measuring 7:0 on the Richter Scale at Port-au-Prince, Haiti. This location serves as a main junction box to undersea transmission cables from the United States mainly to Latin America and African destinations, although some cables go through Port-au-Prince to Europe, we understand.

This was an operation put together under criminal President Clinton, after CIA-instigated instability had resulted in the departure of the Haitian ruler du jour, enabling ‘peacemaker’ Jimmy Carter to be parachuted in to ‘patch things up’ – under cover of which operation the transmission cables and junction box system was installed for Latin American money transfers. It has long been reported to us, and we have publicised this information in our journal The Latin American Times, that Haiti is a key staging point for drug shipments, and represents an operation ‘handled’ by Al Gore.

• Florida-based sources informed us in the early morning of Wednesday 13th January 2010 that earthquakes have not, in their long experience, previously been reported from Haiti. Furthermore, such a strong earthquake would have been felt and registered in the United States itself. The initial impression following this report was that an induced earthquake centred on Port-au-Prince might have been intended to disrupt mandated Settlements payments this week. While discussing this matter with the Florida parties, the Editor’s line was disconnected.

•On further consideration, however, US sources advised the Editor at about 1:15 am UK time on Wednesday 13th January 2010 that it was rather more likely that if this was an induced ‘earthquake incident’, its purpose would have been to PREVENT the stealing and diversion of the Settlement transfers to corrupt recipient central banks and institutions in Latin America (and Africa, such as the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe). In other words, the ‘incident’ was aimed at ensuring that the monies were not stolen and diverted while in transit through Haiti (which is what has been happening, and why this god-forsaken location was set up for the purpose).

• A US TV News programme aired on the evening of Tuesday 12th January 2010 suddenly revealed the existence of an airport having very long runways in Illinois called Mid America Airport located close to Scott Air Force Base, operative since 1997 (Clinton) which, to this day, receives precisely one flight a week – from Colombia. Maintaining this airport costs the local county $7.0 million per annum. Quite why the existence of this airport that handles just one flight a week – from drug-trafficking Colombia – was suddenly revealed at this juncture, was not yet clear to us as this report was being finalised. But we and others felt sure that the timing and substance of this exposure could not have been ‘accidental’.

WHAT THE REACTION TO OUR BULL’S-EYES HAS REVEALED
If what we publish were irrelevant, beside the point, unadulterated drivel or all of the above, responses would be non-existent. But if what we publish is to the point, cuts to the quick, and exposes lies, deception and hypocrisy – and possibly massive ongoing fraud: see below – we need not be surprised if responses are vituperative, explosive, out of control – and highly revealing.

We can dismiss the nutcase on mixed drinks and speed who invents 90% of what he vomits – and imagines, in his fever, that the Editor cites verses from Scripture from time to time because the verses contain secret codes. We imagine that, given the CIA’s years of indoctrinating people in New Age delusions, stupid inventions like that may be thought to ‘have traction’ at the lowest intellectual levels. However according to multiple responses conveyed to us, unfettered mirth commingled with contempt appears to be the flavour ju jour in the face of the relevant mental defective’s latest spate of intemperate outbursts.

THE LOUDER THE SCREAMS, THE DEEPER THE WOUND
It is manifestly the case that one can easily measure the extent to which verrucas and warts have been trodden on and flattened, by the screams of agony emitted by their owners. Take the equally intemperate and incoherent rants of the cowardly anonymous CIA deceiver and sorcerer calling himself Casper – the name of Cheney’s home town in Wyoming, and also traditionally of one of the three ‘wise men’ (Magi, sorcerers) who laid down their gifts at the feet of Jesus Christ at His birth – thereby proclaiming that divination, sorcery, magick and all Works of Darkness defer to the Lord and cannot escape His constraints and framework.

WHAT THE CIA’S PONZI SORCERER HAS BEEN SAYING
Now let’s see what this CIA-underworld sorcerer has been saying on a suitably compliant website in response to our straightforward recently published observations. Apart from his routine excoriation of this Editor without a cause, here’s what he’s been telling you:

• He’s a former securities broker-dealer.

• The securities regulations do not apply to him.

HAS HE CONVICTED HIMSELF BY PROTESTING TOO MUCH?
By making these assertions, the sorcerer has condemned himself and may also have inadvertently exposed another massive fraud linked to the George Bush Center for Intelligence (and Terrorism), Langley. Specifically:

(1): The securities regulations and the relevant legal position have been displayed and listed at the foot of these reports for several years. The relevant securities regulations based in part on the US Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934, apply to EVERYONE IN THE UNITED STATES.

See Legal Notes below.

(2): ‘The securities regulations don’t apply to me/us’. That’s what Madoff used to tell officials from the Securities and Exchange Commission when they scoured his offices for evidence of fraud: see the S.E.C.’s interview with Madoff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center conducted on 17th June 2009: Appendix One below. Madoff is currently serving 150 years at the pleasure of Uncle Sam for having operated a gigantic Ponzi operation whereby the principal investments of his victims were routinely STOLEN.

OK: WHY don’t the US securities regulations apply to Casper and the unfortunate Ponzi ‘packages’ victims/participants? Does he imagine that, for some reason, the anti-terrorism provisions of Patriot Acts I and II somehow do not apply to him?

(3): We wonder whether Casper-sorcerer’s outbreaks of uncontrolled vituperation against the Editor of this service, suggest that he may actually himself be engaged in Ponzi-style Fraudulent Finance operations and/or other variants of securities fraud?

(4): We further wonder whether his reluctance to identify himself might indeed be associated with (3) above. Otherwise, what is he hiding and hiding from?

HOW THE CIA SORCERER CAN MITIGATE TROUBLING DOUBTS
No doubt he will be able to inform everyone whether or not these questions have merit. If he has nothing to hide in this connection, he will presumably finally reveal his own identity and discard his cowardly cloak of anonymity once and for all, so that any troubling doubts on these matters, such as those identified here, can be laid to rest. Let’s see what he does (they do).

You will recall that one of this sorcerer’s favourite refrains is that Christopher Story knows nothing about ‘our business’. In the first place, the sorcerer has no way of knowing what this Editor knows, unless he has been clandestinely rifling through our files.

Secondly, as the whole world knows, we have published several detailed analyses, with charts, prepared by Michael C. Cottrell, acknowledged to be one of the United States’ most talented and proficient securities experts – studies that have been featured in International Currency Review, a financial journal that the Editor has published since 1970 and which is to be found lodged with central banks, institutions, official agencies, in libraries and generally all over the world. After 40 years of such publishing, it stands to reason that this Editor would hardly, professionally, release such material – both on this website and in the journal – if it were not of the highest intellectual and technical standard: which is the case, as our subscribers recognise.

Thirdly, it is not the case that we know ‘nothing’ about ‘his business’. On the contrary, we appear to know a little too much for the sorcerer’s comfort. Specifically:

• As we have pointed out, all these Ponzi schemes form part of the immense criminal intelligence operation to ‘take down’ the United States which we exposed in our report dated 9th January 2010, codenamed ‘OPERATION STILLPOINT’. There are NO EXCEPTIONS.

• Therefore, in contributing to any of these Ponzi schemes (however labelled, whether they are called ‘humanitarian’, to make the underlying fraud look ‘acceptable’ for basic marketing purposes, or whatever), the contributors (investors) were aiding and abetting OPERATION STILLPOINT – a criminal subversion offensive directed from WITHIN THE CRIMINALISED U.S. STRUCTURES to ‘take down’ the United States: the dialectical parallel/‘opposite’ of the ‘takedown’ of the USSR.

OPERATION STILLPOINT RUN BY THE SAME GANG THAT RAPED RUSSIA
Furthermore, THE SAME CRIMINAL CADRES WERE INVOLVED, including Mikhail Gorbachëv – a partner of George H. W. Bush Sr., Dr Joseph Ackermann (CEO of Deutsche Bank), and Helmut Kohl in Deutsche AG, Switzerland, formerly Barrington Investment Group.

• For instance, we know for a fact that the OMEGA programs were/are linked to the US CIA criminal operative and ‘former’ MK-ULTRA chieftain, Richard B. Cheney, one of the very nastiest and most cynical of all the official perpetrators of scams against the American people and the United States.

THE SORCERER AND HIS APPRENTICES
An investor should not only have regard to the Prudent Man Rule at all times, but should do his due diligence so that he is aware of the use to which the funds will be put (‘use of funds’).

FURTHER:

• An investor who, wittingly or unwittingly (because of having been deceived or bamboozled) allows his or her funds to be applied for a criminal use such as that intended under OPERATION STILLPOINT becomes, by definition, a co-conspirator in the criminal activities of the operation. Since such contributed funds were channeled inter alia into the actual revolutionary financing of terrorism (al-Qaeda), these people have all wittingly or unwittingly (overwhelmingly unwittingly) allowed their contributed funds to be used for the criminal financing of terrorism.

• On 11th January 2010, Michael C. Cottrell’s corporate telephone rang off the hook, following the posting of our report dated 10th January. Mr Cottrell had to inform a number of shocked callers (including OMEGA participants) that they themselves have been contributing to the financing of terrorism. This was never their intention but, as indicated, ignorance of the law is no excuse.

• FACT: As stated in the preceding report, the criminal mind entices its targets into a compromised position whereby the target is converted into a co-conspirator. This is STANDARD PROCEDURE.

That way, the criminal mind believes not only that it will be ‘protected’ because the entrapped participant cannot escape, but also that the fraud being perpetrated is ‘foolproof’ (until everything starts to unravel – as is happening now).

• The Casper-sorcerer’s CIA-inspired, convoluted ‘packages’ agitprop operation has served the key purpose of providing cover for the perpetrators of the underlying scams, while at the same time falsely appearing to be serving the interests of the Ponzi victims/participants by disguising from them the reality that they are de facto co-conspirators, while also seeking to ‘keep their spirits up’ by giving them false hope that eventually their payouts will occur.

• On at least one occasion, the sorcerer has suggested that the packages ‘may have been lost’. Sources repeatedly inform us that such ‘packages’ as really did exist were in fact ransacked and their contents were stolen (monetised). We have checked this assertion repeatedly with different sources, and that is what we are told every time. In which case, it would appear that the sorcerer MUST know this, which begs the further question:

• If the Casper-sorcerer knows what we ourselves know from multiple sources, WHY is this anonymous coward withholding such information from ‘his’ readers – and further, WHY has the website platform that has been used for this agitation and propaganda for a prolonged period of time not done its own due diligence to find out the answers to such questions?

Could it be that the website platform is itself involved in any fraudulent securities or other scamming operation that the unnamed Casper-sorcerer, who has stated that he is a former securities broker-dealer, may be involved in?

IS THE PUBLIC SORCERER ENGAGED IN DECEPTION AND FRAUD?
The US securities regulations exist in order to protect the rights and funds of investors. Casper-sorcerer, a former securities broker-dealer by his very own admission, says that the securities regulations do not apply to him and therefore to the Ponzi victims (‘package’ victims) whom he purports to be assisting.

In making these claims, Casper-sorcerer appears already to be engaged in deception and fraud, because the regulations DO APPLY to him and to the participants; and by systematically informing them that the reverse is the case, he is deceiving and lying to them – for which crime alone (the deliberate dissemination of false investment information) he should be investigated, arrested and prosecuted: see the CHANGE OF POLICY at the US Department of Justice, applicable to all officials INCLUDING INTELLIGENCE SECTOR OPERATIVES that we reported on 28th December 2009 which reflected inter alia the Executive Order promulgated by President Obama on 17th November 2009, shown below as Appendix Two; please see also the accompanying US Department of Justice Press Release: Appendix Three.

So, is Casper-sorcerer by any chance using his blatherings on the cooperative New Age website as a front to cover up massive ongoing financial fraud, and has he just exposed himself by yielding to the temptation to libel, insult and excoriate the Editor of this service without a cause, when the much more sensible course that he should have adopted would have been to shut up?

Who is this apparent ‘singular’ criminal, Neil Bush?

SOLUTIONS TO THE U.S. PONZI VICTIMS’ PROBLEM
In order to free themselves from the danger of prospectively being treated as co-conspirators (which on the one hand seems less likely now that the worst US criminal finance cadres are being exposed and on the run, but seems at the same time paradoxically MORE likely given the CHANGE OF POLICY at the Department of Justice), US Ponzi victims who have not done so or who are not covered by prior Court decisions may need to take a leaf out of the CMKM/CMKX book and to SUE the perpetrators of the Ponzi scams in question.

The moment victims do this, they position themselves quite clearly, in the eyes of the law, as victims and not perpetrators. However, judging by the reaction of some scamming victims who spoke to Mr Cottrell on 11th 2009 January following our last report, not all (or perhaps relatively few) have understood or realise the implications of the fix they could be in if they are not protected by Court-recognised victim standing. Because in that case, there is always a latent danger that they could ultimately be classed as perpetrators.

The Farm Program victims obtained Court relief, but their payout was then stolen again, so they were fleeced twice. The other Ponzi victims have likewise been fleeced twice, in that the content of their packages was, we are informed, monetised a long time ago.

MAKING AN INDIVIDUAL COMPLAINT TO THE S.E.C.
Individual victims can regularise their status as victims by making a complaint to the Securities and Exchange Commission, revealing that they made a payment or payments to a given party that sold them the so-called investment program (‘humanitarian’, ‘Freedom’, OMEGA (CIA), or whatever), and – disregarding the ILLEGAL confidentiality document that they were made to sign (which may have kept them from reporting the theft to date) – revealing full details of the payment and the official or private sector fraudsters concerned, and which entities, whether European, US Treasury, US State Department, Federal Reserve, JP Morgan Chase, or whatever, signed the contracts, whether signed in a ‘tax-free zone’ or not, and pointing out that their money has been stolen.

Anyone who pays money to a party by way of an investment contract in the United States is subject to the US securities regulations [see below], as is the party selling the program contract, contrary to false assurances that ‘the regs. don’t apply to us’ (e.g. because the contracts were signed in a ‘tax-free zone’ and are covered by a confidentiality document); and this applies whether it was an agency of the US Government itself selling the package or a private sector enterprise, scamster or institution. Confidentiality agreements are anathema, should never be signed, indicate fraud, are illegal, and are null and void in a Court of Law, and in the US securities sector.

REGULARISATION OF THE PONZI VICTIMS’ STATUS
No doubt the individual Ponzi scheme victims’ affairs could also be regularised by means of a further series of class actions, or perhaps via one class action embracing all individuals and groups concerned. But the foregoing approach (reporting the matter to the S.E.C., which would unravel the Ponzi nexus much more extensively), might be preferable.

Certainly, these US Ponzi victims may need to ensure the elimination of all doubt as to their true status as victims in the prospective eyes of the law. If the scam was perpetrated by an arm of the Government, that is nothing to be frightened of – especially now that the Department of Justice must investigate and prosecute ALL financial criminality, INCLUDING scams perpetrated by US intelligence sector operatives who thought they were protected by the notorious crooks’ charter known as the National Security Act of 1947 et seq. That is no longer the case, if it ever was.

The CMKM/CMKX plaintiffs identified in Case Number CV10-00031 JVS MLGx filed on 8th January 2010 in the United States District Court, Central District of California, and displayed immediately on being filed, on this website [press ARCHIVE], can never be branded as co-conspirators and perpetrators (which may never have been the case: but this statement is factual anyway).

Given the unprecedented allegations that 2.25 trillion phantom shares in CMKM/CMKX were illegally traded from within the Securities and Exchange Commission itself, the plaintiffs are demanding monetary compensation of $3.87 trillion, and settlement of this amount has to be made within 21 days of service. We understand from the lawyer concerned that service will occur during the week beginning 18th January; so settlement will need to be effected some time in February.

As the S.E.C. can hardly contest this case, it is thought that the CMKX/CMKM victims may be paid out by or on that date.

[Remember: We merely REPORT. We do not and are NOT ALLOWED to tender advice. Everyone is responsible for the bed they are lying in, and legal advice must necessarily be sought].

AN INADVERTENT SMEAR, AND ANOTHER THREAT
Separately, whereas the notorious vituperative FBI scamster who accuses the Editor of using verses of Scripture to mask intelligence codes, and suggests that this Editor is an operative engaged nefarious activities, can be disregarded because he’s being laughed at and ignored except by a few gullible people, we take exception to two further responses to our last report:

• First, while kind and complimentary observations were made by the source in question, to say that this Editor is ‘tainted’ by the fact that he is a Brit, is quite ridiculous. In what manner is one ‘tainted’ by one’s nationality? That otherwise generous web ‘blogger’ may not be aware that the Editor has visited the United States approximately 130 times since 1977, and can therefore fairly claim to be among the best informed British observers of the great nation, the United States of America, which he knows well and loves.

• A web report published on 12th January and promoted inter alia on another US website by Benjamin Fulford from Japan gratuitously brackets this Editor with notorious website abusers of both fact and the English language, and then adds: ‘As for me, I am a spokesperson for the Black Dragon Society’ – which, ‘folks’, in case you didn’t know, are JAPANESE ASSASSINS.

This careless comment could therefore rightly be interpreted as another death threat: if aimed at the Editor of this service, it would be his 34th threat since the start of this research in 2002, and his 11th threat of death. The same source completely misreads the central import of the LINE-ITEM PAYMENT issue exposed in our report dated 10th January; but when someone is engaged in issuing threats, one imagines that it is hardly their highest priority to reflect the truth.

• APPENDIX ONE:
THE FULL TEXT OF THE S.E.C. INSPECTOR GENERAL’S INTERVIEW WITH MADOFF AT THE METROPOLITAN CORRECTIONAL CENTER IN LOWER MANHATTAN ON 17TH JUNE 2009.

This interview was published verbatim, after we had obtained the prior written permission of the Office of the Inspector General of the Securities and Exchange Commission, in our financial journal Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 5 & 6, Fourth Quarter 2009, on pages 15-20.

INTERVIEW OF BERNARD L. MADOFF
At approximately 3:00 pm on June 17, 2009, Inspector General H. David Kotz and Deputy Inspector General Noelle Frangipane interviewed Bernard L. Madoff at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, 150 Park Row, New York, NY. Madoff was accompanied by his attorney, Ira Lee Sorkin of the firm of Dickstein Shapiro, LLP, as well as an associate from that firm, Nicole DeBello.

The interview began with IG Kotz advising Madoff of the general nature of the OIG investigation, and advising that we were investigating interactions the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) had with Mr Madoff and his firm, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLP (BLM), going back to 1992. At that point, Sorkin advised Madoff that his only obligation was to tell the truth during the interview. The interview began with Madoff stating that the prosecutor and trustee in the criminal case “misunderstood“ things he said during the proffer, and as a result, there is a lot of misinformation being circulated about this scandal.

However, he added, “I’m not saying I’m not guilty”.

THE 2006 EXAMINATION
Madoff recalled that with respect to the 2006 OCIE exam, “two young fellows”, (Lamore and Ostrow) came in “under the guise of doing a routine exam”. He said that during that time period, sweeps were being done of hedge funds that focused on front-running, and that was why he believed that Ostrow and Lamore were at BLM. Madoff recalled that they were there for two months, and that they “spent 90% of their time looking through emails”. He opined that this is “routine for the SEC now, they feel that’s the way they find things”.

Mr Madoff stated that Ostrow and Lamore looked through bank reconciliations, expense accounts, and checks. He stated that he didn’t understand what they were looking for. He said that he had “tons of capital”, and so he “didn’t understand why they were looking at that stuff”.

Madoff stated that Ostrow was “so cryptic” and that he spent a “huge amount of time looking at invoices for expenses”. Madoff stated that he didn’t know what Ostrow was looking for, because he was looking at cancelled checks and phone bills.

He stated that he surmised that Ostrow was looking for wrongdoing pertaining to something that was going on in the industry at that time, namely, people paying independent contractors.

Mr Madoff also stated that during the 2006 exam, Ostrow in particular kept asking for computer runs. He stated that they taxed his computer programmer in that they “kept asking her to do different runs” and to reformat the material. Madoff stated that Ostrow and Lamore asked him: “Do you do a retail business?” to which he replied: No. He stated, however, that: “At this time (2006), I was trying to conceal”. He also told them, “I don’t manage money”.

Madoff stated that “Everything the SEC did prior to 2006 was a waste of time”.

When asked whether he was the one who told NYRO staff about the DC exam just prior to this, he stated, “Yes“, confirming that NYRO didn’t know DC had done an exam. He said that the SEC NYRO staff insisted it was a routine exam, and that “we haven’t been here in ten years”.

To which Madoff replied, “You were just here”. (Referring to DC OCIE staff).

Madoff recounted a conversation with Ostrow:
WO: “So tell me about this article”. (Ostrow referring to the MarHedge article, leaning back with his hands behind his head “like Lieutenant Colombo”.)
BM: “What about it?“ (Madoff stated that Ostrow was “acting as if I didn’t do this business”).
BM: “Lori Richards has a whole file I sent her with this info. They have it”.
WO: “Well, it’s a big organization; we don’t talk to each other”. Madoff stated that he thought Ostrow was pretending that he had not been aware of the other ongoing examination, but Ostrow was acting “as if the left hand didn’t know what the right hand was doing”.

Madoff stated that he “really got annoyed“ with Ostrow for repeatedly asking BLM to generate computer runs. Madoff stated that during this exam, they “never looked at front-running”. He stated that two months after they left, he received a letter citing him for “two ridiculous violations”, which they were wrong about; the violations they cited were incorrect.

He went on to state that when BLM submitted their response to the SEC letter and copied it to FINRA, FINRA responded like, “What the heck? Are you nuts with this nitpicking?“ Mr Madoff stated: “After two months, they found 2-3 nitpicky things, and they were wrong about those things”.

Madoff stated that he did not provide false documents to the OCIE examiners, except the client statements. He stated that he did not provide or make false records for the SEC. He added that they “never asked for DTC records“ or other records that needed to be prepared.

He stated that Ostrow and Lamore “never really got into books and records as related to stock records or DTC records”. Mr Madoff stated that “they never even looked at my stock records” or did a “box count”. He said he was “astonished” that they didn’t ask for DTC records, and stated that only a regulator could get those records from DTC, and the SEC would “have to go to DTC”. He added that the DTC does not have separate accounts for each customer, but rather, provides a global report, but stated that if they went to DTC, they would’ve seen his market-making position, and that it “would’ve been easy for them to see” the Ponzi scheme.

Madoff stated that the SEC could’ve gone to counterparties, and if they had, they “would’ve seen it”, adding, “they didn’t do any of that”. He stated that “it’s the only thing to do”, and clarified: “If you’re looking at a Ponzi scheme, it’s the first thing you do”.

OCIE INQUIRY 2 YEARS PRIOR TO 2006 EXAM:
Mr Madoff recalled that two years before Ostrow and Lamore came to examine BLM, he received a phone call from Lori Richards, which he characterized as an inquiry for a hedge fund sweep. He stated that while in the lobby of his building, his personal cell phone rang:

LR: “Bemie, its Lori”.
BM: “Hi Lori”.
LR: “I need you to help me out.
Can you tell me about your hedge funds?”.
BM: “I don’t have a hedge fund”.
LR: “I didn’t think so”.
BM: “I execute trades for hedge funds”.

Mr Madoff recollected the call lasting about 15 minutes, and stated that John McCarthy may have been on the call, but could not remember for sure. He remembered Richards telling him that he’d probably get a call from McCarthy and that they may need more information from him.

Shortly thereafter, Madoff received a phone call from McCarthy, during which McCarthy told him, “You’ll get a letter after the first of the year”.

Madoff stated that when he got the letter, it was readily apparent to him that they were focused on front-running and thought it was part of a sweep that the SEC was doing on front-running. He then recalled the letter was seeking the names of hedge funds he did business with, a description of his split-strike conversion strategy, copies of “maybe” two years of statements from large hedge funds, and his P&L trading profit in those securities.

ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATION
Madoff said it was “amazing to me“ that he didn’t get caught during the SEC Enforcement investigation, because they specifically asked him: “Are these securities at DTC?” They further pressed: “What is your account number”. He replied: “646”. Madoff stated that it was “obvious they thought that something was amiss”. He went on to say that when they asked for the DTC account number: “I thought it was the end game, over. Monday morning they’ll call DTC and this will be over… and it never happened”.

Madoff stated that when nothing happened, he thought: “After all this, I got away lucky”. But he said he thought it was just “a matter of time”, saying “that was the nightmare I lived with”.

When Enforcement did not follow up with DTC, “I was astonished”. Madoff stated that the Enforcement investigators “asked all the right questions, but it was still focused on front-running”.

He said that the investigators dismissed the allegation of a Ponzi as “inconceivable to them”.

He noted that the SEC never asked him about his accounting firm. He stated, “I used a small accounting firm, but I also used KPMG in London and they were terrible”. Madoff stated that he got the impression through all the exams and investigations that “it never entered the SEC’s mind that it was a Ponzi scheme”.

He noted that there was a DTC Terminal in the cage, but: “They never went in to the cage”.

When questioned as to why he didn’t bring an attorney to the testimony that he gave in the Enforcement investigation, Madoff stated: “I didn’t think I needed one”. He added: “I had good answers for everything. Everything made perfect sense”. He said he did not come to the testimony without an attorney because he was trying to fool the SEC into thinking he had nothing to hide. He also denied that he ever changed course during his testimony. He said, “No, that’s not what I said. Options are not part of the model, that’s what I said”.

When questioned as to whether he was concerned about Mr Frank DiPascali giving testimony, Madoff answered: “No, he didn’t know anything was wrong, either”. Madoff further stated that he was surprised that the Enforcement investigators never asked for options contracts. He stated that he only had a master contract, and also that: “You can’t replicate options records”. When we asked him if he had options contracts ready in case • the SEC asked for it, he answered: “No”. Madoff stated he “was relieved“ when he got the letter from Enforcement indicating the case was over.

He was relieved all he had to do was register.

FAIRFIELD GREENWICH:
Madoff stated that the widely-reported telephone call with Fairfield Greenwich related to an argument that was continuing between BLM and the SEC as to whether BLM had to register as an IA [Investment Adviser]. Madoff stated that the problem was with the Fairfield Greenwich marketing prospectus’s mention of Madoff. He said: “I told my clients I’m not an investment adviser. I wasn’t giving investment advice”.

Madoff stated that this was the crux of his argument with the SEC, that “I’m not giving advice, I’m employing a strategy”. Madoff went on to state that the reason he said what he did during the telephone call with Fairfield Greenwich is that he was trying to impart this view of his rôle, and added: “Look, these guys aren’t rocket scientists. That’s the problem”.

EXAMS AND INVESTIGATIONS GENERALLY
When questioned, did he ever steer exams towards front-running, he answered:

“No. I didn’t have to”. Madoff stated that he didn’t have to tell examiners his rôle in the industry, because they already knew.

Madoff stated that the investigators didn’t ask him questions regarding the Ponzi because “everybody dismissed this aspect”. He didn’t believe from the examinations that there was any focus on a possible Ponzi scheme.

Madoff stated that there were two points at which he thought “the jig was up”:

(1): During the on-site OCIE examination, because he thought it was routine for the SEC to check with an independent third party.

(2): Right after his testimony given during the SEC Enforcement investigation when they asked him “what’s your DTC account number?”

Madoff noted that it was standard operating procedure for the SEC to give two week’s notice to prepare documents, but said he “never prepared records for SEC investigations or examiners”.

He said the only one at fault is Ostrow, because “that’s his job on-site”.

When asked about whether he was concerned the SEC would do an IA exam after he agreed to register, Madoff responded no; and that in general, he understood IA exams to be less rigorous than BD [Broker-Dealer] exams, noted that the cycle for IA exams was different, and had no reason to think that an IA exam would be any different than a BD exam.

Madoff stated that he was “worried every time” he was examined or investigated by the SEC, and that ‘it was a nightmare for me’, because ‘it was very basic stuff”.

He added: “I wish they’d caught me six years ago, eight years ago…”.

Madoff told us that everything that he had told Lamore, Ostrow, and the Enforcement Investigators and his strategy and the computer model was true. But, he added, that “even with artificial intelligence, you still need to have a gut feel”.

He said, “It’s a combination of technology and trader’s feel, and I was a good trader”.

Madoff noted that there are two schools of thought on how to deal with exams:

(1): Make the examiners crazy, make things difficult for the examiners (in connection with this, Mr Madoff noted that every firm keeps its books and records differently, and that having an examination is “like getting a tax audit; it’s a pain in the ass”).

(2): Cooperate with the examiners, make it easy (which Madoff stated is what “we always did”).

Madoff stated that SEC examiners didn’t always look at the big picture issues; rather, they focused on minutiae. He stated that he didn’t have any suggestions as to how to fix that problem. However, he stated that he believed the problem with SEC examiners is a combination of the “experience they have and the procedure they use”. He said: “It all comes down to budgets, I guess”.

Madoff indicated that it lent to the credibility of his firm that he’d passed examinations by the SEC. He stated that some clients would ask him when he’d last had an exam; he’d give them the date.

[The next segment addresses Madoff’s
responses to named personnel as follows]:

LORI RICHARDS:
Madoff stated that “he had known Lori for a number of years”. He stated that he sent Lori Richards a copy of his strategy (likely referring to documents he provided to the SEC in 2004).

He stated that he doesn’t know Lori really well, but he’s on a first-name basis with her. He stated that she’s a “tough regulator”. He said she’s ‘not a pals-y wals-y, let’s go for drinks type of person’.

OSTROW:
Madoff indicated that Ostrow was an “obnoxious guy”, and noted that Ostrow wore an SEC jacket with the word ‘Enforcement’ emblazoned across the back.

Madoff stated that Ostrow wore this jacket in the BLM offices, as well as while going in and out of the building. Madoff also stated that this jacket ‘caused an uproar’ in the BLM Offices, and that it did not look good to have someone walking through the building with a jacket such as that. Madoff asked Ostrow if he was in the Division of Enforcement with the SEC, which Ostrow indicated he was not. Madoff stated that Ostrow “was very cryptic”.

Madoff stated that Ostrow was “doing things that made no sense to us at all”. He added that Ostrow was a “total asshole” [sic]. He said Ostrow “was an idiot”, citing Ostrow’s repeated requests for computer runs, which would take eight hours to run off.

Madoff stated: “I almost came to blows with him”.

Madoff characterized Ostrow as a “blowhard” who acted aggressively and was not intimidated by Madoff. He fiurther noted that Ostrow “talked tough, but didn’t look at anything”.

LAMORE:
Madoff said he thought Lamore understood options.

MARK DONOHUE:
Madoff stated that Mark Donohue looked at the right things for front-running, but only would have discovered it was a Ponzi scheme if he had gone to DTC.

Madoff stated that communications from Donohue “just dropped off”. He stated that during the examination, he called Donohue:
BM: “Is there something going on here I should know about?“
MD: “No, we’re just trying to understand the business. Sunlight is the best disinfectant”.

DTC:
He stated that reconciling records with the DTC was something they “should’ve done in ‘06”. When questioned as to whether the Ponzi scheme would have been uncovered by the SEC if it had gone to DTC, he stated: “Yes. It’s very easy to do”.

He stated that in 2006, it was clear they asked about front-running because there were sweeps of the industry at that time for front-running. But in trying to discover a Ponzi scheme, he stated: “It’s very easy if you want. You must do a third party check. It’s absolutely a must”.

He went on to add that “It’s Accounting 101 to look at DTC, do a box count” if you are looking for a Ponzi scheme. When asked if his accounts were segregated at DTC to see if there was trading, he replied: “Yes, of course”.

Madoff stated that in the very beginning, he was buying stock. However, later on, if the Securities and Exchange Commission asked for DTC records, there would have been no way of duplicating a DTC record.

When asked, “Did you ever have fake DTC records ready in case the SEC asked for them?”

Madoff answered: “No”.

THE EXAMINATION IN 1992:
Regarding the 1992 Investigation and Examination of Avellino and Bienes, Madoff stated that the DTC records he provided during the OCIE exam were good. He said: “I returned the money immediately”.

Madoff stated that Dick Walker (who was then head of NYRO) said: “I told the examiners that if Bernie Madoff is handling these accounts, you have no problem”.

Mr Madoff stated that “I had no idea these guys (Avellino and Bienes) had thousands of clients”.
He said the SEC saw that the trades were real in 1992. When asked if the SEC did in later exams what they did in 1992, would they have uncovered the Ponzi scheme?…

Madoff answered: “Absolutely”. He added: “There is no way they can avoid being criticized for not doing that in 2006”. Madoff said that in 1992, the SEC came for the examination and he recalled that John Gentile was the supervisor. Madoff described Gentile as an “Italian guy who was wearing a short sleeve shirt”, and called him a “no bullshit” guy. Mr Madoff stated that Gentile came to BLM and wanted to see the stock record, the DTC records, and the blotters.

Madoff said that Gentile “knew what he was looking at and that was it”. (Madoff also contrasted this experience with Ostrow who “comes in like he’s Colombo”).

ON DEALING WITH THE S.E.C.:
Madoff stated that he was the only representative from BLM that dealt with SEC staff because that was the way he “always“ handled the exams. He said: “I always dealt with the exams. My brother handled the market making exams”.

Madoff stated that 2003 was the first time that he could’ve been caught by the SEC.

Madoff said that when the MarHedge and Barrons articles came out, he expected the SEC to come to him, and that he was surprised the SEC didn’t follow up with him. He also mentioned that Erin Arvedlund (“That idiot woman from Barrons“) didn’t know what she was talking about, and that it was obvious she was not familiar with the industry.

Madoff stated that he was “kidding“ when he said he was on the “short list“ to become SEC Chairman. He didn’t remember telling anyone that Cox would be Chairman before he was named.

Madoff stated that when comparing the SEC and NASD (FINRA), “the level of skill of the staff is pretty much the same”. However, he noted that people in the industry are more concerned about an SEC exam than a FINRA exam in general. Madoff denied that he ever acted as a reference for an SEC employee who was seeking a job. He also stated that he never called anyone at the SEC or Congress to influence an examination of his firm.

ON BEGINNING THE PONZI SCHEME:
Madoff stated that the “problem occurred when I made commitments for too much money and then I couldn’t put the strategy to work”.

He stated: “I had a European bank, I was doing forward conversion, they were doing reverse conversion”. He stated that the returns he typically generated, “I thought I was going to be able to do”. He explained that when that didn’t happen, he thought: “Fine, I’ll just generate these trades and then the market will come back and I’11 make it back… and it never happened”. He added: “It was my mistake not to just be out a couple hundred million dollars and get out of it”.

MARY SHAPIRO:
Madoff stated that Mary Shapiro was a “dear friend”, and that she “probably thinks I wish I never knew this guy”. Madoff stated that Shapiro was a Commissioner and signed the order in respect of the 1992 Avellino and Bienes matter.

ANNETTE NAZARETH:
Madoff stated that he knows Nazareth better than he knows Lori Richards. He said that he knew Nazareth “very well”, and mentioned that she also knew his brother and two sons.

He also indicated that he was Chairman of the Market Structure Committee when she was the head of Market Regulation.

ARTHUR LEVITT:
Madoff stated that he knew Levitt at Amex, before he was at the SEC, and stated that he knew Levitt “very well”. Madoff stated that he went to lunch with Levitt once, to complain to Levitt that he “had to do something about Internet stocks”. Madoff stated that Levitt subsequently “went on TV and gave a warning about it”.

CHRISTOPHER COX:
Madoff never met Cox.

WILLIAM DONALDSON:
Madoff stated that he and Donaldson were “sort of like competitors”, and noted that they had “mutual respect for each other”.

ELISSE WALTER:
Madoff stated that he knows Walter “pretty well”, and characterized her as a “terrific lady”.

LINDA THOMSEN:
Madoff stated that he met Thomsen at SIA meetings, but did not know her well.

OTHER S.E.C. STAFF:
Madoff stated he does not know SEC Commissioners Paredes, Aguilar, or Casey. He stated that he knew economists working at the Securities and Exchange Commission, but just as part of working in the industry.

HARRY MARKOPOLOS:
Madoff expressed disdain for Markopolos and the fact that Markopolos has received a lot of press, stating that Mr Markopolos calls himself a “seer”. He called Markopolos a “joke in the industry”. He went on to state that “this was a guy who was just jealous” of his business. He stated that “hedge fund guys are just marketers”.

ON ERIC SWANSON AND SHANA MADOFF:
Madoff denied that he ever dealt with Swanson, and denied knowledge of the romance. He stated that he “found out after the fact”. He said that his brother was afraid to mention it to him. Madoff stated that he “didn’t even know she was going with him until a couple of years afterwards”, and estimated he found out six months before the wedding. He said his brother said to him: “Shana is dating Eric Swanson”.

Madoff replied: “Who?“ Peter said: “He works for Lori Richards”.

Madoff described Eric as a “straight sort of guy”. Madoff stated that the relationship between the two “never gave him any comfort” about being examined by the SEC, and denied ever asking Shana to go get information or otherwise influence an examination.

SIMONA SUH AND MEGHAN CHEUNG:
Madoff stated that Suh and Cheung “acted professional“ and that they were “knowledgeable as much as attorneys can be”.

However, he noted that they were not as knowledgeable as an industry insider.

REPUTATION, STRATEGY, AND INDUSTRY:
Madoff noted that he was in the securities industry for 50 years prior to his arrest and that he “wrote a good portion of the rules when it comes to trading”.

Madoff stated: “I’m very proud of the rôle I played in the industry… of course I destroyed that now”.

Madoff stated that he served on the committee as to who should register as Investment Advisers. He said that they were trying to get hedge funds to register, and stated that “nobody wants to register“ because then, they would be subject to prosecution for fraud.

He noted that Investment Advisers (IAs) start as small operations, as opposed to Broker-Dealers (BDs) which are generally formed from large businesses.

He noted that there is a general feeling in the industry that Broker-Dealers have a harder time in exams than Investment Advisers. Mr Madoff stated that he wasn’t concerned about registering because there would be a more thorough IA exam, because there was the understanding that IA exams were easier than BD exams, and also, the IA exam cycle is different. He further stated that he had the understanding that the first IA exam that a newly registered entity got was actually less rigorous than a BD exam.

Madoff said that he took the position that he was not required to be registered as an IA. Madoff stated that when dealing with the SEC, there was “never any hint” that the SEC was looking for signs of a Ponzi scheme or that they were looking at his trading. He stated that this was “primarily because of the reputation I had”. He had not been aware of the specificity of the complaints brought to the SEC’s attention.

Madoff stated that OCIE was looking for front-running, and even if somebody said he was doing a Ponzi scheme, they’d “probably discount this accusation“ because they’d think: “Why would he do a Ponzi scheme?“ He added: “Of course they’d be shocked it’s a Ponzi”. He stated that they would be “astonished”.

Madoff stated that he’d heard that Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs, and Crédit Suisse wouldn’t do business with him; however, he indicated that David Kamansky (Merrill Lynch’s CEO), Dan Tully (former Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch), and the Chairman of Morgan Stanley (he did not name John Mack) were clients of his.

He stated that these people did business with him and did not think the returns of 10-12% were unusual. He stated that if you look at his strategy day-to-day, it would tend to be “extremely volatile, however, month-to-month it would show low volatility. He stated he would hold on to a loss until it became viable again, and that the strategy itself was real, “not that exotic”, and “not that unusual”. He noted that he sent Lori Richards a copy of his strategy.

Madoff stated that the SEC focused only on front-running in exams, noting the “returns weren’t that spectacular”. He insisted that “credible people knew it could be done or else they wouldn’t be clients”. He stressed that the strategy made sense, and that stories of 300% returns were “total nonsense”. He stated that “All you have to do is look at the types of people I was doing this for to know it was a credible strategy”.

He added that “They knew that the strategy was doable”, and that they “Knew a lot more than this guy Harry [Markopolos]”.

Madoff noted that the industry is growing incredibly complicated. He gave the example of when his firm put up a credit default swap and didn’t know how to put it on the books. Madoff said he didn’t know, and it wasn’t in [the] manuals, so he called [REDACTED: Personal Privacy].

He said [REDACTED] didn’t know, but conferenced in another industry person, who told him to put it in his London office books.

He said he called Merrill Lynch, Lehman Bros, five firms total, all of which didn’t know. He said the NASD had no clue. Madoff stated that today, lots of trades are done off the books because people don’t know what to do with them.

Madoff stated that the only problem with SEC Headquarters is that he had “too much credibility with them and they dismissed the Ponzi”.

Madoff said: “You can’t have the transparency the regulators want you to have because it’s proprietary and detrimental”.

He stated, “By and large the industry is honest”.

He added: “I got myself in a terrible situation; it’s a nightmare… The thing I feel worst about besides the people losing money is that I set the industry back”.

Madoff noted that he “did work in the industry long before I did anything wrong”. Madoff spoke of the situation: “It’s a tragedy; it’s a nightmare”.

Madoff insisted that his market making business was totally walled off from the financial side. ENDS.

APPENDIX TWO:

THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release November 17, 2009:

EXECUTIVE ORDER
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FINANCIAL FRAUD ENFORCEMENT TASK FORCE

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to strengthen the efforts of the Department of Justice, in conjunction with Federal, State, tribal, territorial, and local agencies, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes and other violations relating to the current financial crisis and economic recovery efforts, recover the proceeds of such crimes and violations, and ensure just and effective punishment of those who perpetrate financial crimes and violations, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1: Establishment. There is hereby established an interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force (Task Force)led by the Department of Justice.

Section 2: Membership and Operation. The Task Force shall be chaired by the Attorney General and consist of senior-level officials from the following departments, agencies, and offices, selected by the heads of the respective departments, agencies, and offices in consultation with the Attorney General:

The Department of Justice;

The Department of the Treasury;

The Department of Commerce;

The Department of Labor;

The Department of Housing and Urban Development;

The Department of Education;

The Department of Homeland Security;

The Securities and Exchange Commission;

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission;

The Federal Trade Commission;

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation;

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System;

The Federal Housing Finance Agency;

The Office of Thrift Supervision;

(The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency;

The Small Business Administration;

The Federal Bureau of Investigation;

The Social Security Administration;

The Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigations;

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network [FINCEN]’

The United States Postal Inspection Service;

The United States Secret Service;

The United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement;

Relevant Offices of Inspectors General and related Federal entities, including without limitation the Office of the Inspector General for the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board, and the Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program; and

Such other Executive Branch departments, agencies, or offices as the President may, from time to time, designate or that the Attorney General may invite.

The Attorney General shall convene and, through the Deputy Attorney General, direct the work of the Task Force in fulfilling all its functions under this order. The Attorney General shall convene the first meeting of the Task Force within 30 days of the date of this order and shall thereafter convene the Task Force at such times as he deems appropriate. At the direction of the Attorney General, the Task Force may establish subgroups consisting exclusively of Task Force members or their designees under this section, including but not limited to a Steering Committee chaired by the Deputy Attorney General, and subcommittees addressing enforcement efforts, training and information sharing, and victims’ rights, as the Attorney General deems appropriate.

Section 3: Mission and Functions. Consistent with the authorities assigned to the Attorney General by law, and other applicable law, the Task Force shall:

(a) Provide advice to the Attorney General for the investigation and prosecution of cases of bank, mortgage, loan, and lending fraud; securities and commodities fraud; retirement plan fraud;
mail and wire fraud; tax crimes; money laundering; False Claims Act violations; unfair competition; discrimination; and other financial crimes and violations (hereinafter financial crimes and violations), when such cases are determined by the Attorney General, for purposes of this
order, to be significant;

(b) Make recommendations to the Attorney General, from time to time, for action to enhance cooperation among Federal, State, local, tribal, and territorial authorities responsible for the investigation and prosecution of significant financial crimes and violations; and:

(c) Coordinate law enforcement operations with representatives of State, local, tribal, and territorial law enforcement.

Section 4: Coordination with State, Local, Tribal, and Territorial Law Enforcement. Consistent with the objectives set out in this order, and to the extent permitted by law, the Attorney General is encouraged to invite the following representatives of State, local, tribal, and territorial law enforcement to participate in the Task Force’s subcommittee addressing enforcement efforts in the subcommittee’s performance of the functions set forth in section 3(c) of this order relating to the coordination of Federal, State, local, tribal, and territorial law enforcement operations involving financial crimes and violations:

(a) The National Association of Attorneys General;

(b) The National District Attorneys Association; and

(c) Such other representatives of State, local, tribal, and territorial law enforcement as the Attorney General deems appropriate.

Section 5: Outreach: Consistent with the law enforcement objectives set out in this order, the Task Force, in accordance with applicable law, in addition to regular meetings, shall conduct outreach with representatives of financial institutions, corporate entities, non-profit organizations, State, local, tribal, and territorial governments and agencies, and other interested persons to foster greater coordination and participation in the detection and prosecution of financial fraud and financial crimes, and in the enforcement of antitrust and antidiscrimination laws.

Section 6: Administration. The Department of Justice, to the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of appropriations, shall provide administrative support/funding for the Task Force.

Section 7: General Provisions:
(a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) Authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof, or the status of that department or agency within the Federal Government; or:

(ii) Functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This Task Force shall replace, and continue the work of, the Corporate Fraud Task Force created by Executive Order 13271 of July 9, 2002. Executive Order 13271 is hereby terminated pursuant to section 6 of that order.

(c) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(d) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

Section 8: Termination: The Task Force shall terminate when directed by the President or, with the approval of the President, by the Attorney General.

BARACK OBAMA
THE WHITE HOUSE, November 17, 2009.

APPENDIX THREE:
President Obama Establishes Interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force:

Press Release issued by the US Department of Justice on 17th November 2009, which called for the establishment of the Task force within 30 days – thus explaining, in part, the timing of the CHANGE OF POLICY at the Justice Department highlighted earlier by this service.

The other crucial factor behind the CHANGE OF POLICY was President Obama’s Executive Order dated 16th December extending de facto diplomatic immunity to INTERPOL and de facto suspending habeas corpus in respect of the necessary operations of INTERPOL given the magnitude of this crisis of corruption perpetrated from within the bowels of the US federal Government itself.

Given what we know about corruption at the highest levels of the US Government and structures, the text below will stick in most readers’ throats. But recall the double-mindedness dimension, the dialectic. On the one hand they are rifling the Treasury, conducting Fraudulent Finance operations, and abusing their public offices; while at the same time, on the other hand, they promulgate ‘sound’ measures to help ‘give Americans peace of mind’ and freedom from fraudsters.

The reality is that they use the public consumption image as cover for their endless criminality.

WASHINGTON: Attorney General Eric Holder, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Secretary Shaun Donovan, and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairwoman Mary Schapiro today announced that President Barack Obama has established by Executive Order an interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to strengthen efforts to combat financial crime. The Department of Justice will lead the Task Force and the Department of Treasury, HUD and the SEC will serve on the steering committee.

The Task Force’s leadership, along with representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities and inspectors general, will work with state and local partners to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, address discrimination in the lending and financial markets and recover proceeds for victims.

The Task Force, which replaces the Corporate Fraud Task Force established in 2002, will build upon efforts already underway to combat mortgage, securities and corporate fraud by increasing coordination and fully utilizing the resources and expertise of the government’s law enforcement and regulatory apparatus.

The attorney general will convene the first meeting of the Task Force in the next 30 days.

“This Task Force’s mission is not just to hold accountable those who helped bring about the last financial meltdown, but to prevent another meltdown from happening,” Attorney General Eric Holder said. “We will be relentless in our investigation of corporate and financial wrongdoing, and will not hesitate to bring charges, where appropriate, for criminal misconduct on the part of businesses and business executives.”

“Through the Financial Fraud Task Force, we are making clear that the Obama Administration is going to act aggressively and proactively in a coordinated effort to combat financial fraud,” said Treasury Secretary Geithner. “It’s not enough to prosecute fraud only after it’s become widespread. We can’t to wait for problems to peak before we respond. We’re seeking comprehensive financial reform to create a more stable, safer financial system and stepping up our enforcement strategy. Doing so will help to stop emerging trends in financial fraud before they’re able to cause extensive, system-wide damage to our economy”.

“To give American families the protection and peace-of-mind they need, it’s clear the federal response must be as interconnected and multi-dimensional as the challenges we face,” said HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan. “No one agency is going to be able to stop financial fraud. This Task force will build upon many of the inter-agency collaborations already underway to protect consumers and restore confidence.”

“Many financial frauds are complicated puzzles that require painstaking efforts to piece together. By formally coordinating our efforts, we will be better able to identify the pieces, assemble the puzzle and put an end to the fraud,” said SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro [Editor: who is named as a Defendant in the $3.87 trillion CMKM/CMKX Complaint filed on 8th January, posted on this website].

The Task Force is composed of senior-level officials from the following departments,
agencies and offices:

The Department of Justice;
The Department of the Treasury;
The Department of Commerce;
The Department of Labor;
The Department of Housing and Urban Development;
The Department of Education;
The Department of Homeland Security;
The Securities and Exchange Commission;
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission;
The Federal Trade Commission;
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation;
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System;
The Federal Housing Finance Agency;
The Office of Thrift Supervision;
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency;
The Small Business Administration;
The Federal Bureau of Investigation;
The Social Security Administration;
The Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigations;
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network;
The United States Postal Inspection Service;
The United States Secret Service;
The United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement;
Relevant Offices of Inspectors General and related Federal entities, including without limitation the Office of the Inspector General for the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board and the Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program; and:

Such other executive branch departments, agencies, or offices as the President may, from time to time, designate or that the Attorney General may invite.

In addition, the attorney general will invite representatives of the National Association of Attorneys General, the National District Attorneys Association and other state, local, tribal and territorial representatives to participate in the Task Force through its Enforcement Committee.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.