RELEASES OCCURRED ON 1ST MAY AS DEMANDED BY WRIT

BUT THE CUSTODIAN BANKS ARE ILLEGALLY BLOCKING TRUSTEES’ ACCESS

Thursday 7 May 2009 08:00

THE BANKS ARE OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, ARE ACTING ILLEGALLY, AND ARE IN GROSS AND BLATANT BREACH OF THEIR BASIC FIDUCIARY DUTIES AS CUSTODIANS OF THEIR CLIENT TRUSTEES’ PAID-IN FUNDS. THESE BANKS ARE PERPETRATING FINANCIAL TERRORISM:

• FUNDS WERE PLACED IN THE TRUSTEES’ ACCOUNTS ON 1ST MAY

• BUT THE CUSTODIAN BANKS HAVE SO FAR ILLEGALLY BLOCKED ACCESS TO THE FUNDS

• THE WRIT HAS THEREFORE NOT BEEN FULLY EXECUTED

• WERE THE BANKS GIVEN PERMISSION TO ACT ILLEGALLY?

• WARNING TO GEITHNER IN THE LIGHT OF THE ABOVE

• OBAMA AND GEITHNER OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE AND PERPETRATING TERRORISM

• CRIMINAL FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES AND THEIR DIRECTORS

• ENFORCEMENT TEAM CONTINUING ITS NECESSARY WORK

• THE CRIMINAL BANKS HAVE NO EXCUSE THIS TIME

• NOW WE KNOW WHY THE TRUSTEES WERE ABUSED ALL WEEKEND

• THE AIR FORCE ONE EPISODE OVER MANHATTAN

• THE CURIOUS MATTER OF THE BRIEFCASE UNDER THE TABLE

• ‘WEAPONISED PNEUMONIC OR BUBONIC PLAGUE’

• FORMER U.S. HIGH OFFICIALS CONTINUE RUNNING ‘BLACK OPS’

• WILD REPORTS BY ANONYMOUS UNPROVENANCED SOURCES

• OUTGOING BRITISH M.E.P. BLASTS THE SHAM EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

THE SOLUTION TO THE CRISIS THAT HAS BEEN AVAILABLE ALL ALONG:
Operating the $ Refunding from London without US Government participation delivers:

(1) Massive ongoing windfall tax accruals to the BRITISH Treasury given that all funds resident in the United Kingdom jurisdiction for 24 hours are taxable by the Inland Revenue. This makes the UK Refunding proposal of extreme interest to Her Majesty’s Government and the UK Treasury.

((2) Massive ongoing windfall benefits to the UNITED STATES Treasury given that it will also receive a cascade of tax accruals from this independent private sector Refunding Program.

(3) The necessary refinancing of the UK and US banking systems ON THE BOOKS with no input from either Government and NO CORRESPONDING DEBT CREATED IN THE BACKGROUND.

(4) GOOD (i.e., on-balance sheet, taxed) money which will CHASE OUT THE BAD MONEY that the crass US Fraudulent Finance concoction will generate.

• In mid-March we published: International Currency Review Volume 34, #2 on Systemic Fraudulent Finance and The Legalisation of Financial Corruption. Also published recently are issues of our titles The Latin American Times, Economic Intelligence Review, London Currency Report, Interest Rate Service and Arab-Asian Affairs. Issues of Soviet Analyst and Global Analyst are imminent.

• For details, see the second white panel on the Home Page.

• To subscribe to our intelligence services, see the catalogue under World Reports Limited.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice is comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor’s study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the Internet Security Solution software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

• DONATIONS: You can help finance these exposures (which the Editor has to prepare on top of his normal publishing responsibilities) by sending us a donation. Press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

• LEO WANTA: As you may recall, the Editor lent this operative $35,000 to extract him from what we diagnosed as fraudulent probation, due to expire on 28th November 2010. This action triggered the entire sequence of unravelling events that has followed. As a consequence, Wanta’s probation was duly shortened by five years, to expire on 14th November 2005. The private funds, which the Editor filched from the proceeds of the sale of our London house, should have been repaid on 11th June 2007 with interest, having been made available for a two-year term. The Editor has not been repaid, Mr Wanta has taken no steps to indicate to the Editor why this is the case, and has not written to explain the situation: so that, as a consequence, these funds are considered to have been stolen.

Furthermore, after the Editor made this platform available to assist Mr Wanta with his problems, he double-crossed us as revealed in our reports dated 3rd and 18th March 2008. Since then, we have had nothing whatsoever to do with this US operative. However on 6th May 2009, he took it into his head to circulate, without our permission, a copyrighted report that we published on the 18th April 2006. The Editor would like it to be known that we did not authorise the redistribution of this article and that Wanta is not permitted to steal our copyrighted works without prior permission. Should any further such breaches occur, we will reserve the right to add this further impertinence to the list of follies that this operative has committed against us, and will take measures to protect our rights.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

RELEASES TOOK PLACE ON 1ST MAY AS REQUIRED BY THE WRIT
On 1st May 2009, the necessary releases, delayed since time immemorial by the corruption of the highest US office-holders, intelligence cadres, banks and their foreign co-conspirators to defraud the rightful recipients, were paid into the Trustee accounts at the relevant US money center banks.

BUT THE CUSTODIAN BANKS HAVE SO FAR ILLEGALLY BLOCKED ACCESS TO THE FUNDS
It is now SIX days later, and the banks acting as custodians of the funds have failed to allow the Trustees into whose accounts the funds were paid, to access them – in gross, criminal breach of their fiduciary duty to enable the Trustees to take economic receipt of the funds for which they are responsible. The banks are therefore engaged in criminal obstruction of justice and terrorism.

FUNDS WERE PLACED IN THE TRUSTEES’ ACCOUNTS ON 1ST MAY
The released funds are ON THE BANKS’ BOOKS, which is the central point to bear in mind when assessing what follows. Instead of allowing the Trustees to handle their funds in accordance with instructions, the criminal enterprise banks are exploiting the existence of these funds that are now ON their books to generate new liquidity, on the working assumption that (a) they will not be held to account and (b) that the President of the United States and the Treasury Secretary will not enforce the law to bring an end to this criminal abuse and obstruction of justice.

THE WRIT HAS THEREFORE NOT BEEN FULLY EXECUTED
The World Court Writ of Execution raised by the Chinese parties and representatives of The Queen reportedly on behalf of the international community to bring an end to this American (and German) financial criminality has therefore not yet been fully enforced. The first stage – release of the funds into the Trustees’ accounts – took place as noted on 1st May 2009, thereby ‘compromising’ the war threat by the international community.

But the second stage, permitting use of the funds by the Trustees, had yet, as of this filing, to be implemented. The banks in question are custodians with fiduciary responsibility to the Trustees, and are required forthwith to place the funds live on their clients’ accounts. They have no latitude whatsoever to prevent their clients from using their funds as they see fit.

But that is not happening. Furthermore, this has been going on for the past six days.

WERE THE BANKS GIVEN PERMISSION TO ACT ILLEGALLY?
Because what they are all doing is ILLEGAL, it appears that the institutions may have been GIVEN PERMISSION TO ACT ILLEGALLY, which may implicate the US Treasury Secretary, Mr Timothy Geithner, and the President of the United States, Mr Barack Obama.

Mr Geithner can ORDER the banks to release the funds to the Trustees but, as of this posting, HE HAD NOT YET DONE SO. That means he is a co-conspirator in this OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

Why is this? Could he have been coerced? Could he have been bought off? The second possibility seems more likely, in view of the sudden appearance – out of context – of the following text at the foot of a report published by the operative Wayne Madsen on 5th May, which also mentioned the London ‘Safety Lock Box’ raids that took place on 2nd June 2008 that we have often referred to in these reports, since they ‘blew’ the geo-corruption linkages sky-high, and have triggered multiple dimensions of the unraveling process, as predicted:

‘Informed sources have told WMR (Wayne Madsen Report) that high-level rumors of a sex scandal involving the Treasury Secretary (Timothy Geithner) are swirling around both the Treasury and the Inter-American Development Bank, headquartered in Washington, DC’.

WARNING TO GEITHNER IN THE LIGHT OF THE ABOVE
Since Madsen is known to be an operative, we take this as a warning to Geithner that he is to be or is being blackmailed; and the reason for the appearance of this text out of context from the rest of the Madsen report dated 5th-6th May is that Geithner is allowing the banks to break the law and is obstructing justice – a not-so-subtle way of drawing to his attention the need for the US Treasury Secretary to reverse himself IMMEDIATELY and to order the banks to cease and desist from their illegal operations, obstruction of justice and abuse of their fiduciary duties.

OBAMA AND GEITHNER OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE AND PERPETRATING TERRORISM
More generally, since Geithner and relevant highest-level officials with the power to do so have NOT PREVENTED THE BANKS FROM ACTING ILLEGALLY, they are ALL OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE and are de facto co-conspirators in this FRAUD and breach of the Rule of Law. Therefore, they can be designated, like the criminal enterprise institutions concerned, as being themselves engaged in perpetrating financial and economic terrorism against the United States, the people of the United States and the Rest of the World, for which only the most severe measures are applicable.

Also obstructing justice and engaging in economic and financial terrorism, given their involvement in these matters, are Mrs Barbara Bush – who is stated by multiple sources to be handling Mr Bush Sr.’s affairs and interacting with the Pierce family given that Bush Sr.’s dementia is progressing fast (it is further advanced than is reported) and he has difficulty recognising his sources by name or face – Vice President Joseph Biden, William Jefferson Clinton and Mrs Hillary Rodomski Clinton.

(Having put his foot in it by stating that, given the ‘flu scare, he would not advise his family to travel on public transport, Biden made sure that cameras were on hand when he publicly appeared on 4th April at the Wilmington, Delaware, train station after riding Amtrak from Washington).

CRIMINAL FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES AND THEIR DIRECTORS
The criminal enterprise institutions that are acting illegally in breach of their fiduciary duties and obstructing justice in this respect are reported to us to include the following:

JPMorganChase, Deutsche Bank acting as clearing house for JPMorganChase, Citibank, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo.

The Directors of these institutions, being responsible to their Boards, are PERSONALLY liable along with their criminal enterprise firms, for the consequences of the crimes being committed, whether authorised by higher authority of not. That includes OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

Higher authority cannot ever authorise illegal activity – the overturning of the Rule of Law – with impunity. It may THINK it can, and the banks that are exploiting the fact that huge sums were placed ONTO THEIR BOOKS on 1st May 2009, may ASSUME that they are authorised to operate illegally, with impunity: but the price to be paid for this grotesque breach of their basic fiduciary duty and the parallel obstruction of justice will almost certainly turn out to be extremely high.

The Directors of these entities (1) are as follows:

Akamoto, Ross, Deutsche Bank AG
Al Thani, Nawaf, Deutsche Bank AG
Armstrong, C. Michael, Citigroup/Citibank
Asmarger, Regis, Deutsche Bank AG
Arzber, Thomas, Deutsche Bank AG
Augustine, Norman, Deutsche Bank AG
Baker II, John D., Wells Fargo
Barnet III, William, Bank of America
Belda, Alain J.P., Citigroup/Citibank
Binh, Pham, Deutsche Bank AG
Bock, Kurt, Deutsche Bank AG
Böhr, Wolfgang, Deutsche Bank AG
Borda, Kenneth, Deutsche Bank AG
Börsig, Clements, Deutsche Bank AG
Botelho, Mauricio, Deutsche Bank AG
Bowles, Crandall C., JPMorganChase
Bramble, Sr., Frank P., Bank of America
Braunstein, Jason, Deutsche Bank AG
Bryant, Charles, Deutsche Bank AG
Bryson, John, Deutsche Bank AG
Budzvna, John, Deutsche Bank AG
Burke, Stephen B., JPMorganChase
Capellas, Michael, Deutsche Bank AG
Cardoso, Fernando, Deutsche Bank AG
Cash Jr., James, Deutsche Bank AG
Casjens, Günther, Deutsche Bank AG
Chandler, Edward, Deutsche Bank AG
Chen, John S., Wells Fargo
Colbert, Virgis W., Bank of America
Collins, John T., Bank of America
Conroy, Kathryn, Deutsche Bank AG
Cote, David M. JPMorganChase
Countryman, Gary L., Bank of America
Crown, James S., JPMorganChase
Cunningham Keith, Deutsche Bank AG
Dean, Lloyd H., Wells Fargo
Deering, Anthony, Deutsche Bank AG
Deutch, John M., Citigroup/Citibank
Dimon, James, JPMorganChase
Dunham, Archie, Deutsche Bank AG
Eick, Karl-Erhard, Deutsche Bank AG
Fallon, Robert, Deutsche Bank AG
Förster, Heldrum, Deutsche Bank AG
Fortabat, Maria de, Deutsche Bank AG
Franks, Tommy R., Bank of America
Futter, Ellen V., JPMorganChase
Gifford, Charles K., Bank of America
Gray, III, William H., JPMorganChase
Griswold IV, Benjamin, Deutsche Bank AG
Grundhofer, Jerry A., Citigroup/Citibank
Guzman, Nicolas, Deutsche Bank AG
Hashimoto, Toru, Deutsche Bank AG
Herling, Alfred, Deutsche Bank AG
Hernandez, Jr., Enrique, Wells Fargo
Herzberg, Gerd, Deutsche Bank AG
Howell, William, Deutsche Bank AG
Idei, Nobuyuki, Deutsche Bank AG
Iglesias, Enrique, Deutsche Bank AG
Jackson, Jr., Laban P., JPMorganChase
James, Donald M., Wells Fargo
Jeffe, Robert, Deutsche Bank AG
Job, KBE, Peter, Deutsche Bank AG
Johnson, Robert, Deutsche Bank AG
Joss, Robert L., Wells Fargo
Kaden, Lewis B. Citigroup/Citibank
Kagermann, Henning, Deutsche Bank AG
Kangas, Edward, Deutsche Bank AG
Kappes, Hans-Peter, Deutsche Bank AG
Khan, Rafi, Deutsche Bank AG
Klee, Martina, Deutsche Bank AG
Kley, Karl-Ludwig, Deutsche Bank AG
Kovacevich, Richard M., Wells Fargo
Kuczynski, Pedro-Pablo, Deutsche Bank AG
Labarge, Suzanne, Deutsche Bank AG
Lee, Gang-Yon, Deutsche Bank AG
Lévy, Maurice, Deutsche Bank AG
Lewis, Kenneth D., Bank of America
Li, David, Deutsche Bank AG
Liveris, Andrew N., Citigroup/Citibank
Lozano, Monica C., Bank of America
Luengas, François, Deutsche Bank AG
Mark, Henriette, Deutsche Bank AG
Marram, Ellen, Deutsche Bank AG
Martin, Lynn, Deutsche Bank AG
Massey, Walter E., Bank of America
May, Robert, Deutsche Bank AG
May, Thomas J., Bank of America
McCormick, Richard D., Wells Fargo
McDonald, Mackey J., Wells Fargo
Mer, Francis, Deutsche Bank AG
Milligan, Cynthia H., Wells Fargo
Mitchell, Georgina, Deutsche Bank AG
Mitchell, Patricia E., Bank of America
Montova, Miguel, Deutsche Bank AG
Moore, Nicholas G., Wells Fargo
Mordashov, Aleksey, Deutsche Bank AG
Moriarty, Rich, Deutsche Bank AG
Mulcahy, Anne, Citigroup/Citibank
Neubart, Garrett, Deutsche Bank AG
Nocvak, David C., JPMorganChase
Oetker, August, Deutsche Bank AG
O’Neill, Michael E., Citigroup/Citibank
Pagani, Luis, Deutsche Bank AG
Pandit, Vikram, Citigroup/Citibank
Parsons, Richard D., Citigroup/Citibank
Pfeiffer, Eckhard, Deutsche Bank AG
Phelps, Michael, Deutsche Bank AG
Pina, Antonio, Deutsche Bank AG
Pischetsrieder, Bernd, Deutsche Bank AG
Platscher, Gabriele, Deutsche Bank AG
Prueher, Joseph W., Bank of America
Qingyuan, Li, Deutsche Bank AG
Quigley, Philip J., Wells Fargo
Ramadorai, S., Deutsche Bank AG
Raymond, Lee R., JPMorganChase
Rhodes, Bill, Citigroup/Citibank
Ricciardi, Lawrence R., Citigroup/Citibank
Rice, Donald B., Wells Fargo
Rodin, Judith, Citigroup/Citibank
Rogowski, Michael, Deutsche Bank AG
Rossotti, Charles O., Bank of America
Ruck, Karin, Deutsche Bank AG
Runstad, Judith M., Wells Fargo
Ryan, Charles, Deutsche Bank AG
Ryan, Robert L., Citigroup/Citibank
Ryan, Thomas M., Bank of America
Sada, Armando, Deutsche Bank AG
Samuelsson, Hakan, Deutsche Bank AG
Sanger. Stephen W., Wells Fargo
Santomero, Anthony M., Citigroup/Citibank
Schaeffer, Maria-Elisabeth, Deutsche Bank AG
Siegert, Theo, Deutsche Bank AG
Sloan Jr, O. Temple, Bank of America
Snow, John, Deutsche Bank AG
Steel, Robert K., Wells Fargo
Stumpf, John G., Wells Fargo
Svenson, Susan G., Wells Fargo
Tan, Keng Yamc, Deutsche Bank AG
Teyssen, Johannes, Deutsche Bank AG
Thieme, Marlehn, Deutsche Bank AG
Thompson, Jr., William S., Citigroup/Citibank
Thumann, Jürgen, Deutsche Bank AG
Tillman, Robert L., Bank of America
Todenhöfer, Tilman, Deutsche Bank AG
Toth, Devin, Deutsche Bank AG
Unuvar, Ahmet, Deutsche Bank AG
Urrutia, Miguel, Deutsche Bank AG
Volk, Stephen, Citigroup/Citibank
Wanandi, Sofjan, Deutsche Bank AG
Ward, Jackie M., Bank of America
Weatherill, Lucas, Deutsche Bank AG
Weldon, William C., JPMorganChase
Wenning, Werner, Deutsche Bank AG
Wolfe, Louis, Deutsche Bank AG
Wunderlich, Leo, Deutsche Bank AG
Yunling, Zhang, Deutsche Bank AG
Zetsche, Dieter, Deutsche Bank AG
Zhang, Lee, Deutsche Bank AG

ENFORCEMENT TEAM CONTINUING ITS NECESSARY WORK
The enforcement team headed by Swiss personnel cooperating with foreign government cadres to enforce execution of the World Court’s Writ of Execution continues, we understand, to deploy all means available to procure compliance with the Writ of Execution. Arrests and ‘neutralisations’ have continued unabated for the past several weeks.

Since the enforcement team is NOT free to leave the job half done – as discussed in the preceding report, failure to execute the Writ of Execution is not an option for the team’s members: otherwise they themselves will become co-conspirators in the obstruction of justice – this heightened crisis environment will continue until resolution.

Logic would therefore suggest that ALL Directors of the criminal enterprise institutions engaged in this fraudulent tapping of the paid-in funds, breach of fiduciary duty and obstruction of justice are vulnerable to whatever measures the enforcement team unilaterally decides to take in order to fulfil its instructions and to procure completion of its allotted task – which means compelling these very arrogant and recalcitrant institutions and their Directors, to meet their fiduciary obligations.

THE CRIMINAL BANKS HAVE NO EXCUSE THIS TIME
In the past, criminalist officials and bankers have enjoyed playing the disinformation game of ‘it’s not my fault’: but this option is precluded now because the institutions concerned are all overtly engaged in maximising the accruals to be leveraged off the funds that are sitting on their books in the Trustees’ accounts, which is illegal. The big US banks are in gross breach of standard banking conduct, which means that, as we have often argued in the past, they cannot be trusted to carry out instructions – which further means that anyone dealing with the identified giga-institutions may be risking the loss of control over any funds they handle.

Moreover by depriving the countries and Trustees of their rightful funds while these banks pursue their own selfish interests and obstruction of justice contrary to their fiduciary duty to their clients, the banks have reconfirmed that they are indeed criminal enterprises.

And by condoning this latest appalling breach of banking standards, the Rule of Law, and of trust, President Obama, George Bush 41 and Mrs Barbara Bush et al are active participants in blocking the releases and in obstructing justice – a state of affairs that reflects a reckless degree of risk-taking arrogance that the Rest of the World has come to associate with the pariah nation called the United States of America, and which is liable to lead to a progressive degradation of international relations in the context of open economic warfare built on a substructure of the red-hot internal and external intelligence war which is in turn reflected in the irresponsible lies and diversionary reports churned out by notorious US controlled disinformation outlets.

NOW WE KNOW WHY THE TRUSTEES WERE ABUSED ALL WEEKEND
The foregoing throws new light on why the Trustees were kept at the banks from Friday 1st May through to Monday 4th May, when, as previously reported, a shoot-out occurred, killing two Federal officers. These tensions erupted because instead of allowing the Trustees to access their funds in accordance with their fiduciary obligations, the corrupt banks blocked access and embarked upon another round of exotic financing operations using the money that was now sitting ON THEIR BOOKS as base. In other words, when the releases finally occurred, they ‘pulled another one’.

As noted above, they must have been told that they could proceed to break the law; and this clearance to act illegally could ONLY have come from the highest levels. But as we all know, compliance with an illegal order does not absolve the perpetrator from responsibility at all. The banks that are acting illegally and are obstructing justice are legally as well as criminally liable.

THE AIR FORCE ONE EPISODE OVER MANHATTAN
The episode involving one of the Air Force One planes over Manhattan on 27th April now turns out to have been far more serious than has hitherto been explained, and can be read several ways, including the possibility that it may reflect a deep schism in the bowels of the US official structures.

Although F-16s always take up the lock-on position at the tail of the target aircraft, it is also true that when the fighter aircraft is directly on the tail of a target plane, that is a military position for a shoot-down. If the F-16’s Stinger missile had been released, the US President’s aircraft would have been destroyed. (There were in fact two F-16s present),

If that assumption is correct, the reason for the extraordinary manoeuvres of the Air Force One may have been that the presidential plane had to fly close to the buildings where the warmth emitted from the windows could interfere with the Stinger missile, which is heat-seeking.

On this analysis, the presidential plane shown in the videos was being lined up to be shot down by one of the F-16s, which, by extrapolation may have been given actual instructions to destroy the presidential plane unless it returned to the Washington area. The intention had been for the plane to land at LaGuardia Airport.

Although President Obama was reported to be elsewhere in the country on 27th April, he is known to have a double, thought to be a brother, who is slightly darker but can be ‘touched up’ with the application of those careful make-up skills deployed by the specialists hired from Hollywood for this purpose (see earlier posting). According to an unconfirmed report, it is possible that the purpose of the flight of the plane from the Air Force One fleet was for Obama secretly to attend a meeting at Citibank at which George H. W. Bush Sr. was thought to be present. Any such meeting would have needed to take place at the bank.

In which case, to take this hypothesis to its logical conclusion, the interception of Air Force One by an armed and primed US F-16 which actually locked-on to the tail of the presidential plane ready to shoot the plane down if it did not conform with the F-16’s instructions, provides empirical evidence of something being seriously wrong at the heart of the US structures, of the order of a colossal breach between warring elements – all over the money, of course.

Even though F-16s always ‘tailgate’ like this in such circumstances, the F-16’s behaviour conforms to classic military manoeuvres, indicating at the very least here that the ‘PR pictures’ report was a spurious and feeble, albeit brazen, cover story.

There is probably a link, too, to the shoot-out that occurred in the morning of 27th April, after the country representatives had been abused all weekend long, as discussed in our report dated 29th April – again, over money, or rather the blocking of the Trustees’ access by the banks.

An alternative hypothesis would be that the episode had something to do with shoulder-mounted missiles, some of which are of Russian origin, that were reported to have been brought into New Jersey, home of the seething US component of the Russian mafiya, who ‘want to be paid’ like the Chicago elements as well. On 12th August 2008, 3 men were arrested, one at Newark and two in New York, on suspicion of seeking to procure missiles for launching against US airliners.

That the episode on 27th April may have been related to the known concern over shoulder-fired missiles sounds less far-fetched when we recall the incident earlier this year of the scheduled flight that landed in the Hudson River without loss of life. The videos show that the two engines were damaged in a manner that could not possibly have been achieved by a bird-strike – the story that was quickly peddled to cover up what actually happened – which may have been that the plane was immobilised by one or more shoulder-launched missiles. The video showed a black SUV racing along the side of the river as the plane ‘landed’ on the water. In other words, a message may have been sent by the Russian mafiya that they expect to be paid, or nastier things will start happening.

THE CURIOUS MATTER OF THE BRIEFCASE UNDER THE TABLE
Sources who attended a very recent ‘conservative’ dinner meeting in Washington, DC, at which General John Singlaub, Ross Perot and General Petraeus were prominently on display, reported to us that a certain operative spent the dinner suddenly leaving the table to ‘conduct some business’, returning, vanishing again, and then finally disappearing altogether, during the event. On arrival at the dinner, the spook had brought a briefcase which he slid under the table where he was seated.

When, finally, this agitated individual left altogether and didn’t return, it was later found that his briefcase was still where he had left it under the table. Our sources advise that it was decided to open the briefcase. It contained nothing at all, with the exception of a bottle of liquid. Research reveals that the operative concerned is a distinguished US counterterrorism official and a sniper.

‘WEAPONISED PNEUMONIC OR BUBONIC PLAGUE’
A retired US Army medical expert advises that our first-hand report from Mexico City [1st May 2009 posting] implied to her that the outbreak appeared to involve Weaponised Pneumonic Plague. The Merck Manual states that it has a 2-3-day incubation period, followed by the abrupt onset of high fever, chills, tachycardia, and often severe headache. Coughing, not prevalent initially, develops within 20 to 24 hours. Sputum is mucoid at first, rapidly shows red blood specks, and then becomes uniformly pink (blood). Most untreated patients die within 48 hours after the onset of symptoms.

The authoritative source elaborated:

‘The only way they could have done this would have been using the advance preparatory team that arrives before the POTUS. The team would never have been suspected. Mexico City is the perfect medium for this purpose, having a high concentration of people (over 20 million++), poverty, lousy sanitation and health, and the stagnant air pollution that overhangs the city. I would suspect that the advance prep team would also have been required to check out the top of all the highest and medium-sized buildings (for likely sniper positions). They would have used the tallest buildings and worked their way to street level in order to gain maximum saturation so as to obtain the highest kill ratio, given the dense smog and pollution and heavy population density. They would most probably have used the exhaust systems and would have placed aerosolised delivery systems within them – all set with timers, of course. They would have to have been present in order to release the plague. The entire presidential team would have been on antibiotics so as not to arouse anyone’.

‘Yersinia pestis (Bubonic Plague, or Black Death, which is still found in rodents in the southwestern United States): who would suspect it? It is not the ‘flu. The ‘flu that is (or was) spreading across the United States could simply be a cover. They should spread out and try to find the delivery systems. These people are murderous and very evil, and extremely stupid. They are not the sharpest tools in the shed. They have to find the delivery systems before these operatives attempt to retrieve them’.

‘Bubonic plague involves the lymph nodes and severe swelling, whereas pneumonic plague is a variant but does not involve the lymph nodes so it is usually misdiagnosed, and is very deadly’.

Marc S. Griswold, a former Secret Service agent who was serving as the lead advance special agent for the US Energy Secretary, Stephen Chu, during the trip to Mexico in mid-April, and who travelled with President Barack Obama on his visit, confirmed in early May that the minor cough he contracted in Mexico developed into Swine ‘Flu. The agent’s close family members are among nine probable cases that were reported on 1st May to have emerged in Maryland, Another was a World Bank official who had recently travelled to Mexico.

Although Griswold recovered and was reportedly back at work at the beginning of May, the agent said that his illness severely strained his relationship with his brother; while his daughter, who was not infected, had to endure stares and mean jokes as rumours spread through her school about her father’s rôle in bringing the first cases of Swine ‘Flu to the region. Close friends were refusing to talk to him, after it was realized that he had infected his nephew and other family members.

Of course the real explanation for these reactions was suspicion that Griswold may have been one of the agents involved in releasing what may have been a Weaponised Biowarfare Agent.

As previously reported, samples of agents went missing from the US Army Medical Command’s operation at Fort Detrick, MD. Specifically, on 22nd April, US Army criminal investigators were reported by The Frederick News-Post to be looking into the removal of disease samples from the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases. The investigators are from the US Army Criminal Investigation Unity at Fort Meade.

Fort Detrick (USAMRID) is the US Army’s leading biodefence laboratory, where researchers study pathogens, such as Ebola, anthrax and plague. In February, USAMRID halted all its research into these and other diseases, following discovery of virus samples that weren’t listed in its inventory.

The Institute’s Commander, Colonel John Skvorak, ordered the halting of research while experts conducted a complete inventory of the Institute’s agents, which was not yet complete in late April when this information first surfaced.

FORMER U.S. HIGH OFFICIALS CONTINUE RUNNING ‘BLACK OPS’
Evil operatives and holders of high office like Richard B. Cheney, who is certainly involved in the present situation, are known to continue operations with which they were involved while in office. They believe they are entitled to carry on seamlessly with whatever they were doing or controlling before. This is the origin of the adage that there is no such thing as a ‘former’ operative. Cheney is thought to have ‘split’ from the Bushes since leaving office,

In addition, these people are operatives first, and holders of high office second: so the reason that they carry on seamlessly with their ‘Black Ops’ is really that ‘this is what they do’.

It is clear that George Bush Sr. is/was capable of anything, including crimes against humanity: after all, he was personally responsible, for instance, for the deployment of chemical weapons against the civilian population of Halabja, Iraq, in 1992, a horrific and unrequited crime against humanity.

There is little doubt that the reason, or a key reason, why Bush Sr. and probably former President Clinton, who ‘works for’ or ‘worked for’ George H. W.Bush Sr., remained ‘untouched’ despite the immense crimes that they have committed, was that they have all along been blackmailing the US Government by letting it be known that if crossed, they would be prepared to adopt ‘exceptional measures’, not excluding crimes against humanity. If the US structures were influenced by this hideous blackmail, they failed to understand that the blackmailer is in a weaker position than the blackmailee – since once the blackmailer has used his ‘weapon’, he is powerless. Which may very well now be the case with Bush Sr., a man as evil and dangerous as Adolf Hitler (Schickelgruber).

The good news is that Bush Sr’s. dementia is proceeding rapidly. The bad news is that Mrs Barbara Bush is reported to be intermeddling in Bush Sr.’s Fraudulent Finance affairs. The further very bad news is that Jeb Bush has been wheeled in to carry on where Mr Bush Sr. may be on the verge of leaving off. A former employee at Jeb Bush’s private residence in Florida revealed some time ago that the Jeb Bush home was encased in an aura of satanic evil.

WILD REPORTS BY ANONYMOUS UNPROVENANCED SOURCES
Wild reports from unprovenanced, anonymous US sources which cannot be trusted because the sources conceal their identities and co-ordinates, can be dismissed as consisting of the usual toxic mixture of fact and falsehood. As for the suggestion by an identified source that ‘Internet reports’ may contain disinformation, we object to being bracketed with cowards who post anonymously and therefore cannot be held accountable for what they publish.

And since the object of the exercise is to extract truth from the dense fog of disinformation and lies spewed out by the controlled outlets, it is inevitable that, from time to time, information may turn out to be unreliable. Few can avoid being deceived by these ‘Black Ops’ people sometimes.

But when other sources pick up our feeds, as has happened repeatedly recently, you can be reasonably sure that what we have reported first is accurate ‘to the best of our knowledge and belief’ at the time of reporting. Finally, on this subject, we do not read the anonymous sources.

On one issue reported to us as having been featured in such sources, we do have a constructive observation to make. It is known that much top-secret US military technology has been transferred, during and since the Clinton era, to the Chinese. The motivation for this TREASON, we suggest, is that since the United States (due to the corruption of its structures and top officials) could not pay the Chinese what was owed to them, high-tech US secrets in breach of US national security were handed over IN LIEU OF PAYMENT. This may have happened on several occasions, we suspect.

OUTGOING BRITISH M.E.P. BLASTS THE SHAM EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
During the almost (typically) empty final plenary session of the European Parliament before the European ‘elections’ in June, the Editor’s friend, Ashley Mote, Independent MEP for Southeast England, attempted to sum up, in the one minute allotted for such speeches in the rubber-stamp European Soviet (sorry, ‘Parliament’), what he thinks of that deliberate travesty of democracy.

This is what he said to the European Soviet on 4th May 2009:

‘Over the last five years I have watched in horror the EU’s endless, scandalous, institutionalised looting of taxpayers’ money’.

‘I have watched in horror an already overcrowded UK being deluged by hundreds of thousands of uninvited foreign workers who arrived for their benefit and to claim our welfare’.

‘I have watched in close-up a legislative system which permits anonymous bureaucrats to generate so-called law without any regard for the damage they do to the British economy and businesses’.

‘I have watched in close-up this expensive, ineffectual talking shop of a ‘Parliament’ masquerading as an illusion of accountable democracy – a monstrous deceit on the electors who sent us here’.

‘President Gorbachëv was right (2). The EU is the old Soviet Union, dressed in Western clothes. One day you will realise that you cannot be masters in someone’ else’s house’.

As usual, the few socialists and ideological federalists waiting their turn to speak tried to shout Mr Mote down, without any intervention from the Chairman, of course.

In doing so, they indicated that, as usual, Mr Mote had struck a few nerves.

Notes:

(1) The Directors of the named institutions were collated from the criminal enterprises’ websites on 6th May 2009. In each case, the name of the main institution is indicated only.

(2) This information reflects a comment made by Gorbachëv (real name Orbach, or Korbach) on a visit to London in March 2001.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. Some versions have a ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

SETTLEMENTS AND REFUNDING: OR DOLLAR COLLAPSES

FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF DEVELOPMENTS SINCE THE U.S. ELECTION

Monday 5 January 2009 00:01

• The US dollar requires refunding as a matter of the most extreme urgency.

The G-7-Approved Private Sector on-the-books Capital Markets Refinancing Programme, which was criminally blocked against the interests of the American people and the entire world by the self-serving thieves headed by the Bushes, Paulson, Cheney, the Clintons, Greenspan, Bernanke et al from June 2006 onwards, is the ONLY means whereby this can be achieved.

It CANNOT be done from WITHIN the US Federal Government structures, as the Government ONLY CREATES DEBT. The Private Capital Markets Refinancing Programme agreed upon by the Group of Seven financial powers CREATES REVENUE and ONGOING U.S. TREASURY TAX RECEIPTS.

Government and White House structures, being PUBLIC SECTOR, cannot do this.

The crisis that developed from June 2006 onwards is a SPECIFIC CONSEQUENCE of the corrupt decision by President George W. Bush Jr., Henry M. Paulson, Vice President Cheney, Dr Bernard Bernanke, George Bush Sr, Dr Alan Greenspan, and others, to perpetuate the depraved deficit-financing and fraudulent finance/self-enrichment carousel CREATING EVER MORE DEBT that was then hidden off-balance-sheet, rather than proceeding with the REVENUE-PRODUCING SOLUTION using fully taxed on-the-books private sector capital markets transactions that has been ON THE TABLE since 2005/2006 and which is THE ONLY WAY FORWARD FOR AMERICA AND THE WORLD.

Due to the unchecked criminal, perverse behaviour of the highest-level operatives listed above and exposed by this service, the prospect of the weight of derivative junk crashing through the ceiling into the basement and demolishing several of the largest institutions in the world, is no longer academic. If this happens, there will be a global collapse into uncontrollable chaos.

If the incoming Obama Government deviates in ANY respect from the G-7-Approved on-the-books Private Sector Capital Markets US dollar refunding formula, THE U.S. DOLLAR WILL COLLAPSE and THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC WILL NOT SURVIVE. That is the stark reality: the bottom line.

• Be warned. Our predictions, from September 2006 onwards, have been ACCURATE.

• THIS REPORT HAS BEEN UPDATED TO 8TH JANUARY, 2.00PM UK TIME…

• Mr Barack Obama has been using words like ‘oversight’, ‘transparency, and ‘full accountability’, which are NOT words that sink happily into the ears of the giga-crooks whose time is up. On 8th January, he appointed a Chief Performance Officer, Nancy Killefer, formerly of the IRS Oversight Committee and a Treasury performance evaluation expert.

• MADOFF: $1.7 BILLION IN CASH AND LIQUID ASSETS FOUND BY IRVING J. PICARD: The Trustee appointed by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) has uncovered not only the cash sum of $830 million reported below, but also a further $850 million in liquid assets, according to The Times, London, of 8th January 2009. Judge Ronald Ellis has to decide whether Mr Madoff’s activities, including the distribution by himself and his wife of valuables, called heirlooms by the Defendant’s lawyer, Ira Sorkin, when reporting to the Court on 7th January, warrant the revocation of Madoff’s bail terms. Court documents we hold, seem pretty clear on this point.

• OUT OF THE FRYING PAN AND HOVERING IN MID-AIR BEFORE FALLING INTO THE FIRE?

• THE ELITE POWER CONTINUUM’S NEW-OLD CONTROLLING TEAM

• THE PLAN: TO PURPORT TO IMPLEMENT THE G-7-APPROVED REFINANCING SCHEME WHILE IN PRACTICE CONTINUING CORRUPT ‘BUSINESS AS USUAL’: WHEN THE EDITOR SAID THIS ON THE TRANSATLANTIC PHONE, FORT MEADE PULLED THE CONNECTION, MEANING: IT’S TRUE.

• FOR THESE PEOPLE, DEBT IS AN ASSET CONTAINING CASHFLOW THAT CAN BE STOLEN

• ROCKEFELLERS, FACING DISASTER, FORCING BUSH CROOKS TO COMPLY?

• WHY THERE IS NO WAY OUT FOR THE FRAUDULENT FINANCE CADRES

• THE DEBT-ORIENTED ‘NEW ECONOMIC TEAM’ IMPOSED ON OBAMA

• LEON PANETTA FOR DCI? ARE THESE DESPERADOS MENTALLY CHALLENGED? [NEW]

• THE INITIALLY DELICATE POSITION OF BARACK OBAMA

• INCOMING PRESIDENT IS IN A STRONGER POSITION THAN PEOPLE MAY THINK

• PROMINENT RECENT ‘NEUTRALISATIONS’: SEE ‘IN MEMORIAM BELOW

• ‘FEEDER’ PONZI FINANCIER MURDERED TO COVER UP ALPHA CONNECTION?

• PRESIDENTIAL PARDONS WON’T SOLVE THEIR PROBLEM

• THE SECONDARY ‘FEEDER’ FUNDS WERE SEPARATE PONZI FRAUDS

• PERTINENT QUESTIONS FOR THE BENEFIT OF ‘THE INTERESTED’

• LONDON ‘SAFETY LOCK BOX’ RAIDS REMOVED THE COLLATERAL

• MADOFF PONZI CAROUSEL THEN BECAME A PRIMARY SOURCE OF FUNDS

• FIVE-HOUR EMERGENCY MEETING BETWEEN MRS CLINTON AND GEITHNER

• NEW YORK FED AND S.E.C INVOLVED IN THE MASTER SCANDALS

• BIG BANKS REFUSING CLIENTS ACCESS TO THEIR OWN FUNDS (= THEFT)

• OUTLINE INFORMATION ABOUT CAROUSEL TRANSACTIONS

• ‘RETAIL’ INVESTORS’ FUNDS STOLEN TO FINANCE CAROUSEL PONZI FRAUDS

• OTHER HIDEOUS DIMENSIONS OF THE POISON OF THE OCTOPUS

• ‘MAINSTREAM’ AND COURTS CONCERNED, FOR NOW AT LEAST, ONLY WITH THE MONEY ‘IN’

• FACT: NONE OF THIS MONEY HAS VANISHED. IT HAS ALL BEEN STOLEN…

• STANDARD ‘BCCI PROCEDURE’: COLLAPSE THE ‘MONEY MACHINE’, RAKE OUT THE MONEY

• POSSIBLE ISRAELI TIT-FOR-TAT FOR THE BUSH-TRIGGERED MADOFF TAKEDOWN

• STOKING UP ANTI-SEMITISM: A CYNICAL ‘ADDED BONUS’ FOR THE REVOLUTION

• DOUBLE-MINDEDNESS AND THE DOUBLE-CROSS TRADITION

• ‘MADOFF TAKEDOWN’ RELEASED TRILLIONS TO BE STOLEN WITH EASE

• GLOBALIST STRATEGISTS DESTABILISED BY SUCCESSIVE EXPLOSIONS

• UNPRECEDENTED ADMISSION BY THE IMF MANAGING DIRECTOR THAT ELITE IS TO BLAME

• BANKS HOARDING MONEY IN CASE DTC GUARANTEES ARE CALLED

• CORRUPT ‘BUSINESS AS USUAL’ PLANS IN DISARRAY

• SUCCESSIVE WAVES OF DEFAULTS OUT TO 2012-2014

• THE STRENGTHENING OF BARACK OBAMA’S POSITION

• THE FATE OF DELUDED HOLD-OUTS AGAINST THE SETTLEMENTS

• SHOUTING MATCH OVER PAYOUTS TO U.S.-BASED RECIPIENTS

• UGLY SITUATIONS FACING KEY PLAYERS

• DECISION TO APPLY THE ‘BCCI/ICELAND/ENRON TREATMENT’ TO MADOFF

• BELATED OPERATION TO DISCREDIT PRESIDENT SARKOZY

• WHAT PRESIDENT BUSH JR. WAS REALLY UP TO IN BAGHDAD: TRYING TO STEAL MONEY

• NO DENIAL OF THE MORGAN STANLEY TERRORISM FINANCING CENTER

• AL-QAEDA WILL HAVE TO BE CLOSED DOWN: BY BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA

• FOLLOWING OUR MULTIPLE EXPOSURES, DVD NOW SAID TO BE ‘BITTERLY DIVIDED’

• DVD’S BRUSSELS BLACKMAIL UNIT AIMED AT EUROPEAN COMMISSIONERS: DG1-X

• THE MADOFF HYDROGEN BOMB EXPLODES

• MADOFF RECRUITED BY, AND ‘WORKED FOR’, BUSH/CIA PONZI CRIME APPARAT

• ‘MADOFF TAKEDOWN’: A VAST SMOKESCREEN ‘PROTECTING’ THE GIGA-CROOKS

• MADOFF ‘CHANGES THE SUBJECT’, WHILE LAW ENFORCEMENT SITS ON ITS HANDS

• THE PRIMARY ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS FROM THE MADOFF COURT FILES

• MADOFF BANK ACCOUNTS WITH JP MORGAN CHASE AND BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON

• MORE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON BANK ACCOUNTS COME TO LIGHT

• EXPERT ADVANCE WARNINGS ‘DISREGARDED BY THE S.E.C.’

• HEAVILY PROMOTED STAR WITNESS FAILS TO APPEAR: WAS HE THREATENED?

• PARALLEL INTERVENTION OF THE SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION

• IF YOU THINK YOU’RE A VICTIM, THE FBI WOULD LIKE TO HEAR FROM YOU

• INTERIM LIST OF ‘MONEY IN’ LOSERS ARISING FROM THE COLLAPSING
OF THE MADOFF COMPONENT OF THE GLOBAL PONZI MONEY MACHINE

• FORMER PRESIDENT CLINTON FORCED TO REVEAL HIS ‘DONORS’

• PARTIAL LIST OF CLINTON FOUNDATION ‘DONORS’

• CONCLUSION: U.S. DOLLAR REFUNDING MUST PROCEED AS DEMANDED BY THE G-7

• THE ORIGINAL PONZI SCHEME EXPLAINED: AGAIN, IN CASE YOU MISSED IT EARLIER

• LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS HAVE FLOUTED

• THE COPYRIGHT OF THIS ARTICLE IS OWNED BY WORLD REPORTS LIMITED: ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED. ELECTRONIC REPRODUCTION OF PART OR ALL OF THIS TEXT PROHIBITED.

• WE HAVE RECENTLY ISSUED AN INVOICE FOR $27.3 MILLION AGAINST AN INFRINGER OF OUR COPYRIGHT WORKS IN CALIFORNIA, WITH FULL DETAILS FURNISHED TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WHICH IS HYPERSENSITIVE ABOUT COPYRIGHT BREACHES.

• THE USUAL CROP OF FABRICATIONS ABOUT THE EDITOR OF THIS SERVICE HAS STARTED UP, WITH ONE GROSS LIBEL ASSERTING THAT THE EDITOR ‘WORKS FOR’ A CERTAIN POWER. SUCH LIES ARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO (1) IGNORANCE AND (2) MALICE. THIS OPERATION IS 100% INDEPENDENT, ALWAYS HAS BEEN, ALWAYS WILL BE, AND FUNCTIONS ARMS’-LENGTH FROM ALL OUTSIDE INTERESTS. SEE THE STATEMENT IN PLAIN ENGLISH AT THE FOOT OF REPORT.

• ANONYMOUS SOURCES OF ‘INFORMATION’ AND ‘DEBATE’: By definition, all anonymous US sources of so-called ‘information’ are spooks and other cowards who are too scared to reveal their identities, for fear not least of being held accountable for their convoluted fabrications. Therefore, anyone who attaches significance or relevance to ANYTHING that any of these anonymous, self-contradictory sources purport to be revealing, does so at his or her own peril. One can of course freely choose to be misled by the various US controlled disinformation, diversion and obfuscation sources, if one wishes to avert one’s gaze from the obvious: namely that the kleptocracy is running these Psy-Ops diversionary operations in order to provide themselves with cover for their odious crimes, and to keep the Ponzi victims hoping, like Rip van Winkel, that they haven’t been ripped off. And since the anonymous spooks and cowards hide behind anonymity, any denial of this apparent truth from them will, like all pronouncements aimed at misleading the ‘scammed’, lack credibility.

Obviously, some of these anonymous sources who cannot be held accountable for any of their lies and fabrications, may take objection to what we may publish. However that is their problem: since they do not reveal their identities, no communication with these operatives is ever possible or at any stage desirable, because in any ‘debate’, a level playing field is necessary: a ‘debate’ between a real person and anonymous spooks and cowards would not take place on a level playing field.

The cover of these anonymous spookies has been well and truly blown. When this happens, the knee-jerk response is to resort to defamation. However defamation of a real person by anonymous spooks lacks all credibility too, and simply reveals the pinpoint accuracy of the assessment.

In any case, as has been stated at the foot of most of our reports for years, we cannot enter into correspondence as a consequence of these reports. Many of those who may attempt to enter into correspondence with us are not subscribing to our published services and have no intention of doing so. This service was originally developed to be of assistance to our subscribers, and that is its main purpose. The Editor’s job is to manage and produce the publications listed on our catalog, accessible via this website. The production of these reports is a secondary exercise. Therefore, if you don’t subscribe, we are not available to be of further assistance. The Editor does, however, try to respond to kind and helpful emails expressing positive support, provided that all coordinates are clearly shown in the Contact Us fields so provided. Again, the Editor has been quite amazed at the kindness shown in response to our Christmas posting dated 26th December 2008.

That experience confirms the Editor’s personal experience that Americans are often the kindest and most generous people in the world. Their problem is that their Government is run by organised geomasonic crime. Amid great fury, a tectonic change is in progress which few yet understand.

For a comprehensive debunking and takedown of the geomasonic New World Order, please place an order for the Editor’s book The New Underworld Order, available from this combined website.

• NEW: CALENDAR OF OFFICIAL REGULATORY AND ENFORCEMENT FAILURES: SEE BELOW

• NEW: IN MEMORIAM: LIST OF RELATED/REPORTED SUDDEN DEATHS (‘SUICIDINGS’)

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

Just as material posted on the Internet by ANONYMOUS sources lacks credibility, so that therefore its content should prudently be dismissed as irrelevant, so are emails addressed for our attention from ANONYMOUS senders considered impertinent and unworthy of attention. Secondly, offensive emails ventilating some gripe or other, are normally deleted unread by our system. On a pleasing note, we received a VERY LARGE positive ‘e-mailbag’ following the 26th December 2008 Christmas report, which the Editor found very touching, kind, unexpected and generous*. Thank you! Contrary to expectations, opposition was extremely feeble, confined even to lecturing the Editor on which Bible he should be reading! When you stand up to them, THEY FALL BACK TO THE GROUND.

* Interestingly, all these generous emails (and phone calls) emanated from the United States and Canada. There was NOT ONE SINGLE SUCH RESPONSE from the United Kingdom. NOT ONE.

Advertisement:
NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system that assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program that devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. Some versions have a ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

• INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW, Volume 33, #s 3 & 4, all 972 pages of it, is making waves all over the world. It contains a blow-by-blow deconstruction of this crisis via the Wantagate plus our further analyses: and everything published therein is now well and truly ON THE GLOBAL PUBLIC RECORD. Accordingly the whole world owns a detailed, damning account of the serial criminality of the Bush-Cheney-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ et al., which CANNOT BE EXPUNGED.

• INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW, Volume 34, Number 1, consisting of some 400 pages, WAS DISTRIBUTED BY FAST MAIL TO SUBSCRIBERS WORLDWIDE ON 29TH NOVEMBER 2008…

• It tracks the fallout from our exposures of the criminality from mid-April 2008 to 6th October 2008, when this issue of ICR had to go to press. The Glossary that is published with The Cottrell Plan has been separated out and placed at the end of the issue, for long-term ease-of-reference purposes.

• If you wish to obtain a copy and you are not a regular subscriber, please order International Currency Review via our electronic payment system by pressing SUBSCRIBE. This will give a full-price order sequence. Then press CONTACT US and state that you wish to order ICR 34, #1. The single-issue price has to be at a premium to the regular price, charged at $200.00 per copy. Note:
Please ensure that you send a CONTACT US email to the Publisher at the same time as you press SUBSCRIBE, so that we KNOW to send you ONLY ICR 34, #1 and to charge you ONLY $200.

• The CONTACT US facility is found in the red box throughout this combined website.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• Please Make a Donation to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing global financial corruption investigations, which have turned the whole world upside down and have exposed the corruption which was intended to enable the geocriminalist syndicate to seize the wealth of the entire world. These people have finally been more or less completely stopped in their tracks as a consequence of these exposures. Your assistance will be sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. The Editor’s $35,000 Wanta bail-out money was not repaid and so has been stolen. It will be collected in due course and the thief will be appropriately dealt with, having so far taken no steps at all to repay the Editor’s loan funds, which should have been remitted on 11th June 2007.

• See the second white panel for details of our latest distributed intelligence publications.

• MICHAEL C. COTTRELL’S PROPOSALS FOR THE REFORM OF THE U.S FINANCIAL SYSTEM, AND HIS DEBUNKING OF THE IMPRACTICABLE AND EXPENSIVE ‘PAULSON’ PROPOSALS, PLUS OUR EXTENSIVE GLOSSARY, POSTED ON 22ND JULY AND REPOSTED ON 12TH SEPTEMBER, WERE AGAIN ‘SNIPPED’ BY THE NSA’S MENTAL DEFECTIVES. THE REPORT WAS REPOSTED ON 18TH SEPTEMBER 2008. THE REPORT HAS BEEN EXTREMELY WELL RECEIVED WORLDWIDE.

• PRINT EDITIONS OF THE COTTRELL PLAN: Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 11, #s 9 & 10, published in July-August, was devoted almost entirely to The Cottrell Plan and to the extensive Glossary of financial market and related definitions, which explains where so many people have gone wrong. International Currency Review, Volume 34, #1, also contains The Cottrell Plan and the Glossary, placed at the end of this 400-page issue for long-term easy reference.

• Subscriptions by serious observers and analysts to our services may be placed via this website.

• NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

OUT OF THE FRYING PAN AND HOVERING IN MID-AIR BEFORE FALLING INTO THE FIRE?
In reports posted since the US general Election, we have noted that while, given the imminent end at long last of the evil George Bush II Administration, it can be said that we have jumped out of the frying pan, it has hitherto been too early to conclude that we have yet fallen headlong into the fire. Our stance therefore has so far postulated that we were hanging in-mid-air, pending the arrival of further data, which would make the answer to this riddle more apparent.

Closer now to the installation of the new American régime, we have the following evidence, already publicised here, to suggest that President-elect Obama has not been a pushover for the Forces of Darkness that have apparently hijacked his incoming Administration.

We’ll repeat this evidence first:

• When Mr Obama visited the White House for the first time following the election with his wife, the Bush team tried to bribe him. He rejected this typically brazen, arrogant and crude Bushite attempt to compromise him, according to our special sources. The fact that Obama told the President where to get off is a known PLUS for the incoming President of the United States.

• We also know that when he was briefed by the FBI in Chicago immediately following the election, Mr Obama ‘blew up’ when it was made apparent to him that, under a long-planned CIA contingency arrangement in case he won the election (i.e., if the CIA Forces of Clintonesque Darkness could not rig the outcome to their satisfaction), the framework for his Administration had been decided for him by the mainly Jewish operatives who stand to lose most if corrupt ‘business as usual’ were to be thwarted with the installation of the new régime. Previously we reported that Mr Obama’s first briefing was from the CIA, but since the FBI is subordinate to the organised criminal ‘State within the State’ known as the CIA, that is a nuance that makes little difference. In subsequent days, he also received detailed briefings direct from the CIA.

• It is further known that President-elect Obama lost no opportunity to make it very clear that the Settlements process must be completed (the country recipients WERE paid, effective Friday 19th December 2008, in cash, the Treasury having guaranteed the payments from 18th December). Our information is that he has demanded settlement on several occasions. It is clear that resistance to his demands by the organised criminalists has been only partially successful to date.

• As further reported by this service, when impediments to settlement orchestrated by Gordon Brown became known, President-elect Barack Obama sent an emissary to speak directly with the corrupted British Prime Minister, who is an intelligence officer like his corrupt predecessor, to demand that he cease and desist, on pain of being arrested.

In June 2008, we reported that Gordon Brown’s treachery and dishonesty was exposed when he secretly flew to Belfast, having already said goodbye to President Bush II and his wife in front of the TV cameras on the steps of Number 10 Downing Street. In Belfast, he rejoined President Bush Jr. and his wife, and engaged in certain banking transactions in collaboration with Bush II himself. This was exposed after we posted the following paragraph in our report dated 18th June 2008, which was followed up and found to be accurate:

WHY DID BROWN FLY TO NORTHERN IRELAND HAVING EARLIER
SAID GOODBYE TO THE BUSHES ON THE STEPS OF DOWNING STREET?
We will now pose the following question. WHY was it ‘necessary’ for Brown, who had seen George Bush in the morning of Monday 16th June, to rush up to Northern Ireland so as to be in a position to be standing on the tarmac at Belfast airport, to ‘greet’ the President and Laura when they arrived in Northern Ireland? After all, he had just said goodbye to President Bush. Perish the thought that the purpose of his presence there might have been to open bank accounts. Perish the thought.

• President-elect Obama is known to have been ‘working with’ President Nicolas Sarkozy, who obtained the ‘mandate to pay’ from President George W. Bush at Camp David in October 2008 as previously reported by this service, to procure the Settlements without further ado.

• The ‘Daley people’ and other ‘forces’ out of Chicago want to be paid, too, you understand (do you?) and have, as predicted ages ago, taken the law into their own hands, which is why gunshots are heard in trading rooms, bankers and intermediaries are found sitting at their desks after having suffered heart attacks or with their wrists slashed, and numerous other unspecific ‘neutralisations’ are and have been taking place with increasing ‘Black’ intensity as the hijacking of the whole world by the most ruthless gang of intelligence criminals mysteriously still walking today stretches way beyond the globally critical stage.

THE ELITE POWER CONTINUUM’S NEW-OLD CONTROLLING TEAM
Within this overall context, however, it is a reality that the illicit trading team which is to operate seamlessly from the Obama White House – a team that the ‘Black’ operations intelligence criminals working for and with several domestic and foreign intelligence-linked counterparties put together ahead of Obama’s election victory and foisted on him the moment the election outcome had been confirmed – consists of finance operatives linked to past gross financial abominations, under the preceding two US Administrations.

• This ‘retread’ team intends to continue the illicit trading activity under President Obama’s nose from the White House throughout the new President’s term or terms office, but is facing severe impediments behind the scenes which cannot be reported on at this time.

The primary members of this latest manifestation of the Elite Power Continuum are Rahm Emanuel (a Kissinger operative, member of the Israel Defense Force, i.e. one would suspect him to be an Israeli Military Intelligence Officer), Hillary Rodomski Clinton, Joseph Biden, Tom Daschle (Citibank stooge, mentored by Robert Rubin), Bill Richardson* (ex-Kissinger Associates), Eric Holder (he who arranged the pardoning of Marc Rich, a.k.a. the very long-range DVD operative Hans Brand), General James L Jones (yet another Kissinger associate), Lawrence Summers (mentored by Robert Rubin, guardian of Clinton’s (frozen) accounts), Timothy Geithner (ex-Kissinger Associates), Paul Volcker (Rockefeller family representative yet Chairman of a Rothschild Wolfensohn firm), David Axelrod (a political consultant whose past clients include Senators H. Clinton, John Edwards and Christopher Dodd, Stalin’s grandson), and Susan Rice, ex-Clinton’s National Security Council.

* On 4th January 2009, Bill Richardson, Governor of New Mexico, withdrew his name from the list of candidates for confirmation, citing ‘a pending investigation into a company that has done business with his State’ (code for an imminently breaking corruption scandal). We speculate that Hillary was behind this rapid ‘exit’. What does Mr Richardson know, for instance, about Rocky Flats and the espionage of the Chinese operative Wen Ho Li at Los Alamos, we wonder? Just asking…

The notorious names among these operatives should be arrested forthwith and extradited to the United Kingdom to face charges of financing international terrorism, of economic terrorism, and of stealing from The Queen, and enriching themselves as a consequence inter alia of profiting from the theft of her gold on 29th-30th March 2007, which was exclusively reported, in the first instance, by this service. Protests from various quarters that ‘there is no-one willing to arrest these people’, ignore the fact that by publicising such information, the pressure on these soulless operatives is ratcheted up all the time. After all, the daily lives of all the familiar highest-level criminalists have been rendered intolerable and miserable as a consequence of what has had to be posted to date – entirely as a consequence of the perverse decisions that these people have made so as to be able to continue their terrorism financing operations. That has been their choice: they made their own filthy bed, and they must lie in it.

• Almost everyone in this cauldron has been compromised to some degree or another.

• THE PLAN: TO PURPORT TO IMPLEMENT THE G-7-APPROVED REFINANCING SCHEME WHILE IN PRACTICE CONTINUING CORRUPT ‘BUSINESS AS USUAL’: WHEN THE EDITOR SAID THIS ON THE TRANSATLANTIC PHONE, FORT MEADE PULLED THE CONNECTION, MEANING: IT’S TRUE.

Notwithstanding everything that has happened since Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill was fired by President Bush Jr., after O’Neill had asked him to release the diverted funds, and since we started to publicise the hijacking of the $4.5 trillion, and our subsequent detailed website exposures of the historically unprecedented corruption, the Intelligence Power has put in place an Economic Team, listed below, FOR THE SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE OF CONTINUING WITH THE FRAUDULENT OFF-BALANCE SHEET FINANCING OPERATIONS SEAMLESSLY THROUGHOUT THE OBAMA YEARS, from within the White House as though there has been no discontinuity and no opposition to this corruption had ever surfaced, and the Rest of the World knew nothing about it.

FOR THESE PEOPLE, DEBT IS AN ASSET CONTAINING CASHFLOW THAT CAN BE STOLEN
Beyond the standard criminal finance purpose, the mentality behind this intention (which is being thwarted) assumes that salvation is to be found through the issuance of yet more debt. For these people, who have overstayed their welcome, debt is ‘an asset’ in a sense not usually understood: for the practical factor here is that DEBT PRESUPPOSES A CASHFLOW WHICH CAN BE STOLEN.

Cashflow exists within debt ‘assets’: so these criminal finance operatives are predisposed towards the United States accumulating ever more debt, out to infinity – choosing to overlook the reality that another year or less of this behaviour will destroy the US dollar completely.

• For the dollar to be destroyed, all that is necessary is for one or two big financial powers to refuse to pay or charge for their oil in dollars: and such a development is IMMINENT. The parallel collapse of one or more huge US institutions would destroy the entire world financial economy.

The US dollar external Ponzi operation that ‘worked’ for a century, notoriously depended upon the willingness of foreigners to hold dollars. It is crystal clear to this financial sector observer who has nearly four decades’ experience that if the new US Obama Treasury does not proceed with the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme exactly as conceived, WITHOUT AMENDMENT – namely, that it is to be a PRIVATE SECTOR CAPITAL MARKETS OPERATION, not a Government operation that is susceptible to ‘insider’ corruption run surreptitiously out of the White House and the Treasury, key financial powers will DROP THE U.S. DOLLAR. The argument that ‘there is no alternative’ cannot be relied upon in the situation that will be unfolding in the first quarter of this year.

As the Rest of the World will KNOW at some stage soon (during the first quarter of 2009) whether the new Treasury is to implement the G-7-Approved Refinancing Plan WITHOUT AMENDMENT, any FAILURE OR FURTHER FOOT-DRAGGING on the part of the new Obama Treasury to adhere to the Private Sector Capital Markets Refinancing and US Dollar Refunding Programme as was specifically approved by the Group of Seven (G-7) powers and re-approved at the G-7 Conference in northern Germany in June 2007 when The Queen called for its implementation ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’, could lead to the unhesitating abandonment of the US dollar as the currency in which payment is demanded and made for exported oil, irrespective of all other considerations.

BECAUSE:

• Foreigners will take fright at the prospect of another eight years of a pariah US Government intent upon ADDING TO the overhang of obligations that is threatening to fall through the roof, through all the building’s floors and into the basement, with catastrophic consequences.

The new Obama Economic Team, whether foisted upon the incoming President or not, is DEBT-oriented: which is a recipe for catastrophic and terminal failure. The G-7-Approved Private Sector Refinancing Programme, which GENERATES ON-THE-BOOKS ACCRUALS THAT ARE TAXED AT 35% yielding massive ongoing real money accruals to the US Treasury, CREATES NEW REVENUE AND THEREFORE POSITIVE, TRANSPARENT AND TANGIBLE CASHFLOW that is available both for paying down debt and for urgent infrastructure rebuilding and massive domestic projects: funds that, because of on-the-books transparency, cannot be diverted, stolen, exploited or ransacked by ruthless, wayward finance operatives holding high office within the US official structures.

• It is the ONLY way forward, and everyone, from Barack Obama downwards, and at the highest levels of the leading financial powers, knows it.

ROCKEFELLERS, FACING DISASTER, FORCING BUSH CROOKS TO COMPLY?
As will be seen when we come to the deliberate imploding (by the Bush apparat) of the Madoff Ponzi Scheme Carousel, the two institutions employed by Madoff and his broker-dealership are JPMorgan Chase and The Bank of New York Mellon – the two US exotic financial enterprises which have accumulated colossal inverted overhanging pyramids of derivatives junk liabilities: indeed, JPMorgan Chase, which harbours the Terrorism Financing Center that we have exposed on this website, is where this immense assembly of fraudulent finance Ponzi Scheme scams began.

• IS’NT THAT INTERESTING?

Now, we are advised by ‘deep’ sources that the Rockefellers have ‘got the upper hand’ against the Bush Crime Family apparat. But this is ‘back to front’ in the following respect:

The practical reality is that the Rockefeller interests are in extreme danger of being crushed and reduced to pulp should the accumulated weight of the derivatives liabilities that is sitting on the roof crash through successive floors into the basement: and this will happen, as the Rockefellers know very well, if the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme creating real, on-the-books taxable revenues that cannot be hijacked, diverted or stolen by criminal operatives inside the American structures, is sidestepped, as the New Economic Team was (INCREDIBLY) set up to procure.

Hence, the Rockefeller interests (believed to be backed here by the Rothschilds as well) have been left with no option but to insist that the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme is finally kick-started in the private sector, and NOT via the White House and the Treasury, as the debt-oriented high-level fraudulent finance engineers had intended.

WHY THERE IS NO WAY OUT FOR THE FRAUDULENT FINANCE CADRES
More broadly, the US fraudulent finance sector is now facing the reality of collapse because by spreading the risk so widely, they have in fact generated an environment of open warfare both within the affected financial institutions, between the participants, between financial institutions, between investors and implicated US legal firms, in fact prospectively between every benighted participant in this US-instigated global panorama of financial fraud.

• Why did they spread the risk so broadly?

• Answer: Because it was assumed that if anyone tried to STOP the carousel (as has occurred), the outcome would be a financial nuclear explosion.

On this false premise, they therefore assumed, like professional Ponzi artists and losing gamblers in a casino, that their fraudulent finance carousel could continue sine die and that their formula for manufacturing false wealth out of nothing could never be challenged or brought down.

How wrong these ‘Useful Idiots’ were. HOW STUPID AND ARROGANT, TOO.

Because what they now face is financial annihilation and obliteration whichever way the crisis goes:

• ANNIHILATION when, against the background of the G-7-Approved Private Sector Capital Markets Refinancing Programme, derivatives outstanding are priced, say, at 1 cent on the dollar:

or:

• OBLITERATION if the entire inverted pyramid of derivatives liabilities collapses, destroying the likes of JPMorgan Chase and The Bank of New York Mellon in the process – and of course the Rockefellers AND THE BUSH-CLINTON FINANCIAL CRIME apparatus with them.

In other words, THERE IS NO WAY OUT FOR THE FINANCIAL CRIMINAL CADRES. They are caught and cannot get out with the money they thought they had made.

• But there IS a way out for the Rest of Us – via the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme.

THE DEBT-ORIENTED ‘NEW ECONOMIC TEAM’ IMPOSED ON OBAMA
Meanwhile the emergence of the new ‘retread’ Economic Team, for the purpose of continuing debt financing and fraudulent finance as usual, explains why the outgoing US Treasury Secretary, that devil Mr Paulson, was walking around with a self-satisfied smirk on his face. He knew that when he leaves office, it will be illicit, corrupt ‘business as usual’ – run out of the White House, with him, of course, as a corrupt participant. OR SO HE IMAGINED.

The team members, specifically assembled to continue the illicit financial trading operations out of the White House, Treasury and State Department under Mr Obama’s nose, are as follows (1):

• Timothy Geithner, US Treasury Secretary: President and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, former Director of Policy Development for the International Monetary Fund, Member of the Group of Thirty (G-30), formerly employed at Kissinger Associates, mentored by Lawrence Summers and by Robert Rubin, and a Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission member/participant. [Trilateral Commission is another long-range German front].

• Paul Volcker, to be head of a new Economic Recovery Advisory Board: Former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board under Presidents Carter and Reagan, the former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Chairman of a Rothschild Wolfensohn Company, Member of the Group of Thirty (G-30), longtime Rockefeller Family associate, and a Bilderberg and Council on Foreign Relations member, and North American Chairman of the Trilateral Commission. Volcker, as was previously reported, is also a Trustee, which may be assumed to be liable to influence his thinking.

• Rahm Emanuel, White House Chief of Staff: This man is a member of the Israel Defence Force (IDF), i.e. of a foreign military establishment, from which we deduce that he is the Israeli equivalent of a Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) officer. Why don’t they just install the head of the ongoing Soviet GRU as White House Chief of Staff, and be done with it? A hardline Zionist and a Kissinger protégé, former Congressman and a member of the Board of Directors of Freddie Mac, he also spent two years as an investment banker for Wasserstein Perella [see this report]. He was a key member of Clinton’s finance campaign committee and was implicated in the cover-up of the murder of Vincent Foster. His father was a member of the Israeli Irgun terrorist group, which blew up the King David Hotel inflicting a large number of British military deaths in the process.

• Lawrence Summers, to head the National Economic Council: Summers was US Treasury Secretary during the Clinton Administration, former World Bank Chief Economist, former President of Harvard University (where rising operatives are sent for indoctrination), Board Member of the Brookings Institute, protégé of David Rockefeller, mentored by Robert Rubin, and also a Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission member/participant..

• David Axelrod, Senior Adviser: A political consultant whose past clients include Senators Hillary Clinton, John Edwards and Representative Christopher Dodd (Stalin’s grandson).

• Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State: Originally a clandestine CIA asset who was used to infiltrate the Yale University anti-war movement, Watergate hearings participant, CIA operative, senior partner in the Little Rock, Arkansas Rose Law Firm, key figure in the Mena drug trafficking scandal, alleged architect of the Waco disaster, implicated in many deaths including the cover-up of the murder of Vincent Foster: world-class criminal operative and a Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission member/participant. Likely to order liquidation of the Editor of this service.

• Joseph Biden, Vice President: Senator since 1972, Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Chairman of the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, staunch Zionist sympathiser who told Rabbi Mark S. Golub of Shalom TV: ‘I am a Zionist. You don’t have to be a Jew to be a Zionist’, and a Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission member/participant.

• Bill Richardson: Former US Congressman, Chairman of the Democratic National Convention in 2004, former employee of Kissinger Associates, US Ambassador to the United Nations, Governor of New Mexico, Energy Secretary, key operative involved in the Monica Lewinsky Israeli intelligence honey-trap spying cover-up with Bilderberg luminary Vernon Jordan, and a Bilderberg and Council on Foreign Relations member/participant. THIS CANDIDATE HAS WITHDRAWN: SEE ABOVE.

• Robert Gates, Defense Secretary: The former Director of Central Intelligence (CIA), and Defense Secretary under President George W. Bush, knee-deep in the Iran-Contra scandal and its financial ramifications, named in a 1999 class action lawsuit pertaining to the criminal Mena drug trafficking operation, Co-Chairman of a Council on Foreign Relations Task Force with Zbigniew Brzezinski, and a Bilderberg and Council on Foreign Relations participant.

• Tom Daschle, Health Secretary: Former Senate Majority leader, Clinton lackey, mentored by Robert Rubin and a Bilderberg and Council on Foreign Relations member/participant.

• Eric Holder, Attorney General: heavily involved in procuring the Presidential Pardon for Marc Rich (the long-range Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD) operative Hans Brand), Deputy Attorney General under Janet Reno, and facilitated the pardoning of 16 Puerto Rican FALN terrorists.

• Janet Napolitano, Director of the Department of Homeland Security: Governor of Arizona, US Attorney during the Clinton Administration, instrumental in the Oklahoma City Bombing cover-up (which inter alia covered up the destruction of the German Nazi files kept in the Murrah Building) after she had declared ‘We’ll pursue every bit of evidence and every lead’, soft on immigration, described as ‘another Janet Reno’, and a Council on Foreign Relations Member.

• General James L. Jones, National Security Advisor: Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander, Special Envoy for Middle East Security, on the Board of Directors of Chevron and Boeing, NATO Commander, Member of Brent Scowcroft’s Institute for International Affairs along with Zbigbiew Brzezinski, Bobby Ray Inman, Dr Henry Kissinger, and the former DCI (CIA), John Deutch.

• Susan Rice, US Ambassador to the United Nations: Rhodes Scholar, campaign foreign policy advisor to John Kerry and Michael Dukakis when Presidential candidates, member of President Clinton’s National security Council, Assistant Secretary of State for Africa, alumnus of the Brookings Institution (funded by the Rockefellers and the Ford Foundation), member of the Aspen Strategy Group teeming with insiders such as the odious drug operative Richard Armitage, Brent Scowcroft and Madeleine Albright, and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

On a much more satisfactory tack, Mr Obama has selected:

• Mary Schapiro, to be Head of the severely discredited US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): Ms Schapiro has been Chief Executive of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and was Head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) during the Clinton era, where she ran a very tight ship. This is an inspired choice, as this lady’s reputation stands high; and as The Times, London, stated correctly on 19th December, she has a ‘deep understanding of both financial futures and the commodities markets’.

Given the imperative for the Wall Street Rule Book to be rewritten, as Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. has argued, this appointment is significant, indicating that Mr Obama is ‘not to be messed with’.

• Peter Orszag, to be Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB): Ordinarily, this appointee’s brief is to continue the falsification of the US Federal Budget numbers out to infinity. However Mr Orszag has been Director of the Congressional Budget Office, which enjoys a sound reputation, whereas the OMB has for decades been engaged in creative accounting, smoke and mirrors obfuscation, and the falsification of the US Federal Budget and background debt data. On the face of it, therefore, the appointment of Mr Orszag is an inspired ‘pick’ which, we understand, was entirely Mr Obama’s own: and a clever move this is, too: because if, finally, an honest Director is installed at the OMB, it suddenly becomes much harder for the numbers to be fiddled.

Very significantly, when presenting Mr Orszag to the press and the public on 25th November, Mr Obama predicted a ‘page-by-page, line-by-line budget review to root out unnecessary spending’. And, with his Electoral College landslide victory amply confirmed, Mr Obama proclaimed that he possesses ‘a mandate to move the country in a NEW DIRECTION, and NOT TO CONTINUE the same old practices that have gotten us into the fix we’re in…. As soon as the recovery is well under way, we need to set up a long-term plan to reduce the structural deficit and to make sure that we are not leaving a mountain of debt for the next generation’.

• This sounds pretty much like an Obama endorsement of the G-7-Approved Private Sector Capital Markets Refinancing Programme, which is, and HAS ALWAYS BEEN, the ONLY solution on the table, because only the private sector creates revenue: the Government ONLY CREATES DEBT.

• Separately John Podesta, head of the Obama Transition Team, and former White House Chief of Staff, was implicated in the Vincent Foster murder along with Emanuel and Mrs Hillary Clinton. At the time of this analysis, there was no indication that Podesta would see ‘life after Inauguration’.

• Leon Panetta, former Chief of Staff to criminalist President Clinton, was reported on 5th January to have been selected as Director of Central Intelligence (CIA). THIS IS VERY BAD NEWS. Panetta was involved in all the relevant ‘bad stuff’ under Clinton, and his ‘selection’ (imposition?) suggests a rearguard action by the recalcitrant criminalists to CONTINUE ‘running the money’ through the CIA if, as expected, the intention to continue doing so seamlessly through the White House, the State Department and the Treasury, is closed off (due to factors we can’t go into). If this suspicion is in any way close to the mark, it needs to be understood that THIS WON’T FLY EITHER. The situation is precisely as stated in the opening paragraphs of this report, above the bullet points.

Panetta is very familiar with the secret Halliburton scamming operations buried inside the CIA and the Pentagon which we helped to expose in the summer. He is very fully aware of the faulty Saudi Arabian artillery weapon which killed US troops undergoing training, and he knows all about those toasters costing less than $20 at hardware stores which Halliburton sold for nearly $1,900 a piece. He is Cheney’s evil twin. A HILLARY CLINTON PICK AND IT STINKS.

The US criminalists THINK THEY CAN CONTINUE WITH THEIR FRAUDULENT FINANCE. But time and global patience has run out. Should they remain under this mischievous illusion for long after the Inauguration, they will be BURIED, along with Morgan Stanley, The Bank of New York Mellon, Deutsche Bank and the other corrupt institutons. Such an outcome may be imminent.

• These fools MUST BE STOPPED. THEY ARE OPERATING ACCORDING TO OLD, REDUNDANT CRITERIA. Their model is a train wreck. They cannot continue this fraudulent finance. They think they CAN continue this fraudulent finance off-balance sheet. It is the job of Gold Badges et al to make them understand that the model has not only passed its sell-by date: it’s a grenade that will ignite a financial and economic holocaust with no parallel, affecting the whole of humanity. Clinton is a deeply evil influence inside the Obama camp and is evidently calling the shots. However, this madness CANNOT OVERCOME THE ELEPHANT IDENTIFIED AT THE TOP OF THIS REPORT, and neither can it overcome key factors that cannot be discussed right now. These developments all reflect warfare behind the scenes and cannot be taken as ‘set in concrete’ quite yet.

• There are more shoes to fall (i.e. airborne shoes to be thrown).

• WE UNDERSTAND, HOWEVER, THAT, ALL OF A SUDDEN, THE PENNY HAS DROPPED… Namely, that a calamity will follow any imminent failure to complete the Settlements and the Refunding of the US Dollar by means of the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme using transparent Capital Markets Operations on-the-books, yielding REVENUE, rather than continuing with such transactions off the books, yielding DEBT which is what Government participation in the Refinancing Programme can only generate. The prospect of a catastrophic series of events is of extreme global concern….

THE INITIALLY DELICATE POSITION OF BARACK OBAMA
Because this pre-assembled, debt-focused incoming Obama Economic Team was put in place and apparently foisted on President-Elect Obama (whether with his consent or not is unknown), anger among the CIA-backed Internet Blogocracy was switched after the US Election away from outgoing President George W. Bush to Mr Barack Obama, who was even being referred to in late December as ‘more evil than Bush’ – an amazing transformation, given the fact that Obama had not yet shown his mettle except as analysed above (none of the febrile ‘rumours’ about what he is supposed to have agreed to, had any substance as they were typically proffered by unaccountable ANONYMOUS sources and even if that were not the case, could never be verified): nor can ANY President-Elect promulgate Executive Orders, as has been suggested elsewhere, in a quite astonishing display of ignorance! But then, the sources for this nonsense are ANONYMOUS and thus unaccountable.

The likelihood is that Obama was suddenly the focus of vituperative CIA-fanned attacks precisely because, as indicated here, the Elite Power Continuum served by the Intelligence Power, which controls the US Government, intended to pretend that there has been no discontinuity – and to continue centrally-directed, surreptitious corrupt financial operations out of the new White House under Mr Obama’s nose, as though nothing had happened. Given CIA compartmentalisation, the Blogocracy cannot be expected to be aware that this scheme has already been torpedoed.

It also stands to reason that attempts may be made to blackmail the incoming President.

• However we have two points to stress in this connection:

(1) EVERY SINGLE MEMBER of this crew on the stage and off the stage, even operatives below the radar, is being prospectively blackmailed at all times. There is a ‘Black’ file on 100% of those who are chosen to walk onto the stage. So the fact that Mr Obama is almost certainly being blackmailed by the evil Intelligence Power is essentially a NEUTRAL issue. He has displayed evidence that he can be very tough, and his wife, who should know, has specifically stated that he is and will be ‘a hard task-master’. Therefore, in our opinion this man shows the character and ability to rise above this unavoidable hazard. The way to deal with the threat of any blackmail (which can of course be predicated on lies), even when baseless, is to recall that the blackmailer is invariably in a weaker position than the blackmailee, not least because if he uses his ‘weapon’, he then exhausts all his ammunition and thereafter becomes powerless. Therefore, the best course for Mr Obama, should he have concluded that he may unjustly be a blackmail target, would appear to be to steel himself to ignore any such pressure, and to bear in mind the following foreign example: which is not to be construed as having any implications whatsoever, but solely to make the point that the blackmailer is WEAKER than his target (especially, as in Mr Obama’s case, when the prospective blackmail may be based upon the odious transgressions of lies and false witness):

(2) Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin has been called a ‘vampire’ by his wife, no less. This probably refers to Vladimir Putin’s involvement in certain satanic activities, which would be fully consistent with his background as a Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) operative, as well as his KGB background. (GRU officers are also KGB officers: KGB officers are not necessarily GRU officers).

Mr Putin was further deliberately photographed within the past year kissing the bared tummy of a small child. What was that all about? Here is the answer: Putin, like José Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission, and certain others we could name, is a paedophile, a fact which has clearly been held in reserve by those forces inside the structures who believe they can or could blackmail him. By staging this ‘kissing operation’, Mr Putin ‘blew’ their chances. While the revolting image revealed the truth about Putin’s depravity, it also simultaneously destroyed the blackmailing power threat held over his head. Putin shrewdly calculated that by staging the kissing session, he could neutralise the blackmailers and would ‘get away with it’: which he has.

INCOMING PRESIDENT IS IN A STRONGER POSITION THAN PEOPLE MAY THINK
In summary, if President-elect is liable have false witness deployed against him by these odious operatives, that is not necessarily the end of the world for the incoming President. And the other side of the coin can be summarised as follows:

• Given that all the other characters on the stage will be serving at the President’s pleasure, he will be in a position to dispense with their services should they step out of line. In this connection, Mrs Hillary Clinton has already stepped out of line, according to The Guardian of 24th December 2008, which reported that:

‘The former first lady has wasted no time as she begins building up her team in preparation for taking over as America’s most senior diplomat from Condoleeza Rice’ in January 2009. ‘Sources in Washington suggested Mrs Clinton had embarked on an “empire-building” exercise as she seeks an expanded rôle within Mr Obama’s Administration’.

‘She wants a bigger budget and an expanded role for the State Department, not just in foreign affairs, but in dealing with global economic issues in the current financial crisis’ –

… code for she wants to continue ‘running the money’ as hitherto.

The Guardian further reported that ‘Mrs Clinton has told Mr Obama she wants to appoint high-profile special envoys. Her husband Bill has been suggested as a possible envoy to deal with Pakistan and India –

… code for positioning, reaffirming, revitalising and procuring the implementation (in part, by her CIA husband) of conduits for ongoing illicit financial transactions, and probably also for activation of that $2.0 trillion which at one stage ‘vanished’ into the bowels of the UBS office in India.

Other operatives (all of Jewish extraction, like herself) reportedly being considered by Mrs Clinton as she attempts to build up her State empire prematurely before she had even vacated her Senate seat or been confirmed (which she cannot be until she had vacated her Senate seat), include the well known globalist operative Richard Holbrook, Martin Indyk (a former US Ambassador to Israel), Jacob Lew (Clinton era head of the President’s Office of Management and Budget, and thus deeply involved in the falsification of budgetological numbers), and Mr James Steinberg, a former Deputy National Security Adviser to President Clinton.

Clearly, Mrs Clinton’s strategy is to inflate herself to the max ahead of Mr Obama’s Inauguration so that, as she imagines, he will find her impossible to oppose, or difficult to move: her calculations may also include the knowledge that President Obama would not be able to move her in the early years, not for 18 months, at least: during which time the extension of the illicit, fraudulent trading arrangements would have become embedded within the White House, so that the new President would be ‘unable’ to intervene.

PROMINENT RECENT ‘NEUTRALISATIONS’: IN MEMORIAM: LIST OF RELATED AND REPORTED
SUDDEN DEATHS (‘SUICIDINGS’) GROWING RAPIDLY: 5TH JANUARY 2009 WAS A ‘BAD DAY’
Before going any further, it is unfortunately necessary to review the various appalling publicised, mainly financial sector, ‘neutralisations’ that have taken place recently, as the struggle to procure the Settlements has intensified, in order to carry our investigation forward:

• Paulo Sergio Silva, aged 36, a trader for the brokerage arm of the Brazilian banking congolmerate Itau, was reported to have ‘shot himself in the chest’ during an afternoon trading session of the Sao Paulo commodities and futures exchange last November, stopping trading for 15 minutes.

• Kirk Stephenson, who helped start Luqman Arnold’s investment company Olivant Ltd., committed suicide, a British coroner’s court decided in December 2008. Stephenson, 47, jumped in front of a train on 25th September 2008, at the railway station in Taplow, near Maidenhead, located 28 miles west of London. The train was travelling at 100 miles an hour.

• Alex Widmer, Chief Executive of Bank Julius Baer, Zürich, aged 52, was reported by Reuters on 5th December to have ‘committed suicide’. Two unnamed ‘independent’ sources were cited by the Swiss News website 20Minuten to have stated that the death was a suicide.

Swiss police refused to comment on the death. A bank spokesman, however, was careful to point out for public consumption that there was no link between Widmer’s death and the group’s current [sic] activities, but declined to give further details on the cause of Widmer’s death, saying it was a ‘private matter’. The operative word here was ‘current’, implying that Widmer had been involved in questionable activities in the past: and indeed, further enquiries by this service confirmed that this interpretation is correct. Market sources have advised the Editor of this service that ‘the top Julius Baer banker was killed and we know why’: other sources have stated unequivocally to us that this was a murder, associated with the elaborate cover-up, retribution and ‘neutralisation’ operations that are taking place in the context of the Settlements crisis.

• Gavin Macdonald, aged 47, a top mergers and acquisitions banker, was reported on Monday 8th December 2008 to have died ‘from a heart attack’ at the London offices of Morgan Stanley in Canary Wharf. However he died on the preceding Friday night, so that his death was not in fact announced for at least 56 hours. Macdonald was Global Head of Mergers and Acquisitions for the institution. In view of the fact that he died ‘on Friday night’, there was plenty of lime for a ‘massaged line’ to have been developed to ‘explain’ his sudden death, which was attributed to ‘overwork’. Promptly on the Monday, Morgan Stanley’s CEO, John Mack, led tributes to the dead banker.

Mr Mack heads the institution within which a special suite devoted to the financing of terrorism, which we now refer to as the Terrorism Financing Center, is located. When the Provost Marshal attempted, with Department of Defense Internal Affairs assistance, to enter this room in October 2007, he was barred from entry on the orders of Vice President Cheney, to whom, ludicrously, he reported. You will have noted that THERE HAS BEEN NO DENIAL OF THIS INFORMATION – for the familiar reason, that the intelligence, which came from the actual ensuing investigation, is true.
Macdonald would of course have been aware of the existence of the Terrorism Financing Center, and may well have been considered a prospective threat to the ongoing cover-up operations. Mr Mack’s oleaginous tributes to Gavin Macdonald need to be considered in the foregoing context.

•Christen Schnor, aged 49, a Danish-born senior executive with HSBC bank, was discovered on Wednesday afternoon 17th December hanging by a belt, naked, in the wardrobe of his £500-a-night suite at the Jumeriah Carlton Tower Hotel, Cadogan Place, in Knightsbridge, London, having also rented a £390-a-day apartment for his wife and two children in Lower Sloane Street, in the same upper-class area. Schnor worked at HSBC’s Canary Wharf office. This death resembles that of Amschel Rothschild who was discovered hanging in a high-class hotel in Paris on 11th July 1996.

• Non-banking death: Michael Connell, an IT expert said to have been directly implicated in the rigging of George W. Bush Jr.’s 2000 and 2004 elections (since the Republicans cannot ‘win’ US elections without rigging them these days, as previously explained, due to deliberately arranged demographic factors) was killed on 19th December when his single-engine private plane crashed three miles short of Akron airport. Mr Connell was reported to have told a close associate that he was afraid that George Bush and Vice President Cheney would “throw [him] under a bus”.

It had earlier been verified that Carl Rove had threatened Connell and his wife, Heather (sounds familiar?). Mr Connell had flown to a small airport outside Washington DC on 18th December 2008 for a meeting. On 31st October, Mr Connell had appeared before a Federal Judge in Ohio after being subpoenaed in a Federal lawsuit investigating the rigging of the 2004 election under Karl Rove’s direction. The Judge ordered Mr Connell to testify under oath at a deposition on 3rd November 2008, the day before the election.

The White House is reported to have become extremely concerned that Mr Connell planned to divulge details of his secret illegal work for the White House. Heather Connell owns GovTech Solutions. Both GovTech and an IT firm called SmartTech of Chattanooga, TN, have been implicated in the rigging of the 2000 and 2004 elections and a White House email scandal.

In 2005, the US operative Andy Stephenson was poisoned with a substance capable of mimicking pancreatic cancer, after travelling the United States tirelessly exposing the wholesale falsification of election results using doctored software and rigged electronic voting machines, thus making a mockery of George W. Bush’s puffed-up boasting about ‘spreading democracy’ in the Middle East and elsewhere. Further exposure of this sub-scandal would be very liable to broaden and become engulfed in the colossal fraudulent finance unravelling that is taking place, which the criminalists are trying desperately to cover up, without success.

• René-Thierry Magon de la Villehuchet, 65, founding partner and CEO of Access International Advisors, was found dead with his wrists slashed on the morning of Tuesday 23rd December 2008, in his office at 509 Madison Avenue, New York. The French financier, an aristocratic society fund manager with a chateau in Brittany, was found at 7.50am with no pulse, in his office a couple of blocks from the Rockefeller Center. A spokeswoman for the New York medical examiner was careful to insist many hours later that it had not yet established the cause of death.

In other such cases, ‘sources’ have been in the habit of insisting that the death was a ‘suicide’.

The French financier employed a sizeable army of royally-connected ‘Alpine advisers’ to trawl the casinos, ski slopes and yacht clubs of Europe in frantic search of wealthy investors for investment in his fund, which in turn fed the demand for ‘replacement money’ for the Bernard L. Madoff Ponzi investment operations [see below]. M. de la Villehuchet’s connections and his own aristocratic pedigree enabled him to tap into a rich seam of intermediaries who helped to secure funds on behalf of Access, for onward placement with Madoff.

His ‘advisors’ included Philippe Junot, first husband of Princess Caroline of Monaco, and Crown Prince Michael of Yugoslavia, described as an ‘investor relations executive’. Families said to have invested with the French financier included the Rothschilds, other European grandees, and heirs to the L’Oréal cosmetics fortune, especially 86-year-old Liliane Bettencourt, daughter of the L’Oréal SA founder, Eugene Schueller, who is reported to have invested part of her fortune estimated at $22.9 billion with Bernard L. Madoff through the dead French financier. The 86-year-old holds a 30% shareholding in L’Oréal SA, which is the world’s largest manufacturer and purveyor of cosmetics.

In a letter dated 12th December 2008 to clients, Access International Advisors stated that funds, including its LUXALPHA SICAV-American Selection, were invested solely with Bernard L. Madoff’s investment firm. Data compiled by Bloomberg indicated that it had $1.4 billion in assets as at 17th November 2008. Reporting M. de la Villehuchet’s death on 24th December, The Daily Telegraph cited an anonymous source as stating that it was ‘highly likely’ that the French financier committed suicide, while a French newspaper report stated that he killed himself.

• Adolf Merckle, a German industrialist and billionaire, aged 74, was found on 5th January 2009 near railway tracks in southern Germany. The BBC reported on 6th January that Merckle had lost about 400 million Euros after wrong-way bets on Volkswagen shares. Herr Merckle’s business interests included Phoenix Pharmahandel, a drugs wholesaler with annual sales of about 21 billion Euros, Ratiopharm, a generic drugs company with annual sales estimated at 1.8 billion Euros, Heidelberg Cement, a cement firm with annual sales of 11+ billion Euros, the Kaessbohrer ski-slope equipment firm with sales of 183 million Euros, and VEM, a conglomerate of three engine manufacturers, with sales of 280 million Euros. The total turnover of the deceased’s conglomerate in 2008 was 30 billion Euros. The businesses employ about 71,000 people. Herr Merckle’s holding company had been in talks with banks to secure credit after it ran up high levels of debt.

In a statement, the family commented that ‘the distress to his firms caused by the financial crisis and the related uncertainties of recent weeks, along with helplessness of being unable to act, broke [him] and he ended his life’.

“News of Adolf Merckle’s death left me deeply shaken”, Baden-Wuerttemberg’s Prime Minister, Guenther Oettinger, said. The State had “lost a great entrepreneur”. In November 2008, the State Government signalled it would not assist Merckle after he sought a bailout. Herr Merckle had hired the insolvency lawyer Eberhard Braun and had threatened to initiate bankruptcy proceedings for VEM unless lenders provided him with restructuring capital, according to reports in December.

• WE DO NOT CONCUR WITH THE ABOVE: Merckle almost certainly ‘knew too much’ and appears to have been a victim of the DVD split identified by this service. It is inconceivable that a successful businessman as proficient as Merckle would have entered into one or more wrong-way bets with funds needed for his multiple enterprises. This ‘line’, publicised for public consumption, does not impress, and neither does it compute. Since the DVD and the Bushes HAVE LOST, we are looking at doors being slammed shut, and the slamming doors will be making quite a racket.

• The subtle point to be understood here is that until perhaps 5th January, the Bush Crime/DVD nexus thought they had ‘won’, which was an illusion AND HAS SINCE BEEN CONFIRMED TO THEM to be an illusion. Furthermore, they COULD NEVER ‘WIN’ without also destroying the Rockefellers through inter alia the collapse of JPMorgan Chase (a Germany-oriented bank, and the seat of the Terrorism Financial Center), which means that the Clintons (as the former President is of course a Rockefeller) could not in fact allow the Bushes to get away with their game. Therefore, ALL OF A SUDDEN, and all the more so in the light of certain developments, the Clintons will support the Settlements: which they cannot avoid in view of the reality set out at the top of this report.

• Steve Good, Chairman and Chief Executive of Sheldon Good & Co., a leading US real estate auction firm, was found with a gunshot to the head in his red Jaguar on Monday 5th January (the same day as Herr Merckle threw himself in front of a train near his Blaubeuren home in southern Germany). No suicide note was found with the body, suggesting thsi was yet another execution. Mr Good, who was Chairman of the US Realtors’ Commercial Alliance Committee, had a long-standing business relationship with Donald Trump, according to several reports dated 7th January 2009.

‘FEEDER’ PONZI FINANCIER MURDERED TO COVER UP ALPHA CONNECTION?
Concerning the case of M. de la Villehuchet, who was found at his desk with both wrists slashed, and a boxcutter and a bottle of sleeping tablets on the floor, we also beg to differ with the authors of the ‘received version’ promulgated so very smoothly for public consumption. This man, too, was almost certainly murdered, given his ALPHA involvement.

The La Tribune website stated that the financier ‘could not cope with the pressure following the outbreak of the scandal’, which is an understatement: he was desperately seeking replacement funds to satisfy his devastated aristocratic clients, implying in true Ponzi style, of course, that if such funds could by any remote chance have been procured, he would have disbursed them to refund the clients who had been severely affected or wiped out – leaving the problem of how to handle the new investors until further dupes had been inveigled to invest: but of course, raising any funds at all against the prevailing background, exacerbated by the globally publicised Madoff scandal itself, had by now become impossible.

So, yes, the financier was desperate. But one of the clues to the likelihood that he was murdered lies in the name of one of his funds, LUXALPHA SICAV-American Selection. Here’s why.

• The money invested in Madoff’s operations (THE MONEY ‘IN’) has not been LOST: It has been STOLEN – by associates of the George Bush-Clinton Crime Nexus. In order to understand this, several additional facts must be added here:

(1) It has been confirmed to us that Bernard L. Madoff was recruited into the global George H. W. Bush- controlled money-leveraging and laundering operations around 2005-2006: just when the $4.5 trillion sent over by the People’s Bank of China ostensibly to finance Leo Wanta’s payment became available for the highest-level financial fraudsters to play with. What a coincidence!

(2) It has been separately confirmed to us that Bernard L. Madoff had extensive insider dealer assistance for his Ponzi operations. He could not have operated without such assistance. The immense extent of this collaboration SHOULD emerge as the SEC’s investigations proceed:

• However this depends on the extent to which the SEC, SIPC etc investigations have already been ‘sown up’; and as indicated below, the initial impression gained is NOT ENCOURAGING.

(3) The Madoff operations formed a key component of the global financial corruption carousel presided over by the Bush-Clinton criminal high-level intelligence community gangsters.

René-Thierry Magon de la Villehuchet may have been murdered on the instructions of ‘Black Ops’ elements in order to prevent him exposing in detail the labyrinthine connections linking the Bush-Clinton Crime Nexus to the DELIBERATE takedown of Bernard L. Madoff and to the fact that the Madoff operations represented the Master Ponzi Scheme presiding over an army of subsidiary Ponzi Schemes. However the ‘neutralisation’ of de la Villehuchet cannot, obviously, prevent the inevitable connections being made between the Master Ponzi Scheme, the secondary ‘feeder’ Ponzi Schemes, and the overarching Bush-Clinton-CIA global fraudulent finance abominations being exposed in gory detail, as successive arms of the Octopus unravel and the extent of the biggest financial scandal in world history, and ALPHA’s role in it, is progressively unmasked.

• If those at the helm of this operation imagine that their intelligence connections will protect them in perpetuity, they may have a nasty shock coming to them, even though there may be evidence of a possible ‘insider’ operation to ‘contain’ the fallout from the ‘Madoff takedown’ [see below]. If our suspicions on this score prove to be correct, we would still consider the outlook for these highest-level US criminalists as grim, because the explosion is so huge that even with any ‘accommodating’ associates, they cannot realistically hope to prevent the audit trail from reaching their front doors.

• Also to be borne in mind is the fact that the SEC’s own-account operations, which are absolutely unconscionable for a Regulator, may be liable at any time to be exposed in detail, with the prospect of severe consequences for Mr Cox and others: so the SEC itself would appear to have a vested interest in ensuring that whatever emerges from the myriad complex investigations and the legal processes, is appropriately ‘sanitised’. Again, our view would be that it is FAR TOO LATE FOR ANY SUCH COVER-UP OPERATIONS TO BE WHOLLY ‘SUCCESSFUL’.

PRESIDENTIAL PARDONS WON’T SOLVE THEIR PROBLEM
Following the issuance of a handful of Presidential Pardons before Christmas, President Bush II is expected to ‘do a Clinton’ and promulgate an extended list of Presidential Pardons on 19th January 2009 just before he ceases to be the most disgraced President of the United States in the always disturbed history of the Republic. Observers expect a bumper crop of blanket pardons, including one for himself, which explains why Vice President Richard Cheney, of MK-Ultra notoriety, has been bragging on TV about how he authorised torture (satisfying his innate sadism).

But as mentioned in an earlier report, these people are financiers of international terrorism as defined in their own repressive domestic legislation and in the copycat anti-terrorism legislation promulgated in the European Union context and in the United Kingdom.

Their financial thievery and scamming operations against her Majesty The Queen, the sovereign of America’s supposedly ‘closest ally’, entitles them to be arrested, held in custody, indicted, tried and sentenced to the maximum period of detention, like the many thousands of bankers scooped in the autumn of 2007 and extradited to the United Kingdom and other European countries on charges of economic terrorism, as previously reported.

These former bankers received 25 years’ incarceration for their criminal activities, and many of the lawyers who rushed across the Atlantic to bail them out were likewise arrested as co-conspirators and accessories to the fact of these terrorism financing crimes, receiving similar treatment (as also reported on this website and of course never denied by anyone).

It follows, therefore, that this expected issuance of corrupt Presidential Pardons en masse will not get these criminals off the hook. They may rely upon the fact that their routine corruption has in turn corrupted leaders of European countries such as Chancellor Angela Merkel, who has been receiving bribes from George Bush Sr. in exchange for ‘protecting’ ‘his’ stolen and corrupt funds, or their fellow intelligence operative Gordon Brown, who has been exposed as corrupt, as we have revealed. But the fact remains that, at any stage in the future, any or all of these criminal financiers of global terrorism could be picked up the moment they step into the relevant jurisdictions.

THE SECONDARY ‘FEEDER’ FUNDS WERE SEPARATE PONZI FRAUDS
Stephen Harbeck, Chief Executive of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) who is the senior receiver of Madoff’s now defunct Ponzi-brokerage business, said on the 27th December 2008 that investigators were dealing with a ‘highly complex hybrid fraud’, elaborating that each of the individual investment accounts feeding the Madoff operations could be its own self-contained Ponzi fraud: and this is certainly the impression gained from de la Villehuchet’s desperate attempts to ‘replace’ the funds belonging to his portfolio of previously wealthy European investors.

Speaking on the steps of the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, Stephen Harbeck added: ‘We will trace funds wherever the trail goes’, implying that extensive use had been made of offshore tax havens.

A report in The Guardian on 28th December said that ‘forensic accountants examining Mr Madoff’s [multiple sets of] books believed he had regularly sent large sums of money to offshore accounts in the Caribbean area and Europe. ‘There are accounts at New York Mellon Bank that we have been looking at that appear to have sent and received money from offshore locations’.

Bank of New York Mellon is one of the exotic financial enterprises identified in our reports in 2007 which mishandled the $6.2 trillion of loan funds made available by Her Majesty The Queen and by Prince Al-Aweed al-Talal of Saudi Arabia. As this element of the scandal unfolds, the prospects of the highest-level criminals emerging unscathed is expected to diminish at an accelerating pace.

On 23rd December, US Bankruptcy Judge Burton Lifland ruled that Madoff investors could receive no more than $100,000 in cash compensation, no matter how much they lost – a development that will have come as a severe blow to investors such as Mr Walter Noel (Fairfield Greenwich Group), whose operations ostensibly lost $7.5 billion, while the women’s wear magnate and Madoff mentor Carl Shapiro is reported to have lost $545 million of his personal fortune [see our alphabetical list of ‘victims’ in respect ONLY of the money ‘IN’, below]. Judge Lifland invited all Madoff investors to attend a meeting at the US Bankruptcy Court on 18th February 2009.

PERTINENT QUESTIONS FOR THE BENEFIT OF ‘THE INTERESTED’
At this stage we ask the following questions concerning the financing of terrorism, and economic terrorism, which those whom Lenin called ‘the interested’ will certainly understand:

• What did and do the Clintons, Robert Rubin, Dr Alan Greenspan, Timothy Geithner, Dr Benjamin Bernanke, George W. Bush Jr., Henry M. Paulson, and Vice-President Richard Cheney have to do with Miapollo Investments Limited, Hong Kong, Apollo Management LLP, Eva Teleki, Leo Wanta, Olga Sarantopoulos, Golub Capital, Wasserstein Perella, Timothy Geithner (protégé of the guttural triple agent Dr Henry Kissinger), George H. W. Bush Sr., and Alpha [ALPHA] Bank in Greece: always bearing in mind who set up Miapollo Investments, Inc. and Apollo Management LLP for Bush Sr.?

• For what purpose did M. Jean-Paul Levitte, the former French Ambassador to Washington (now President Sarkozy’s closest intelligence and finance adviser), introduce a Mr Leon Black (not to be confused with a Mr Blue) to Crédit Lyonnais executives in Paris?

What can be stated at this stage is that the above-mentioned ‘worked with’ Mrs Hillary Clinton on the thieving of relevant accounts along with the Bushes, and that all are implicated with the ALPHA fraudulent finance and terrorism financing operation, which is still functioning. These fraudulent finance and terrorism financing operations were and continue to be committed in countries other than the United States, especially the United Kingdom, – so that all these people and their banking and intermediary associates, are specifically implicated in the financing of terrorism abroad. Under the Patriot Act USA et seq, financing terrorism abroad is a violation of the US legislation, qualifying the perpetrators to be arrested and incarcerated sine die, which is what ALL these double-minded perpetrators deserve and will, we believe, ultimately experience.

LONDON ‘SAFETY LOCK BOX’ RAIDS REMOVED THE COLLATERAL
When 300 armed Metrololitan Police surrounded and raided the three ‘Safety Lock Box’ centres located in Mayfair, Hampstead and Edgeware, London, on 2nd June 2008 under the command of Assistant Metropolitan Police Commissioner John Yates, stolen, illicit and other collateral assets being used for fraudulent finance hypothecation purposes were placed wholly out of reach of the criminalist cadres and the corrupt banking strata concerned.

As we reported at the time and have reported subsequently, the British police raids marked a decisive development, arising out of intelligence gleaned inter alia from bankers arrested and extradited to the United Kingdom in the autumn of 2007. It is unprecedented in our experience for such an enormous squad of armed police to attend such raids in Britain, indicating quite clearly to anyone not sitting on their brains that this was an operation of unprecedented importance and significance, involving facing down the most ruthless gangsters on earth. And this judgment has indeed turned out to be accurate.

MADOFF PONZI CAROUSEL THEN BECAME A PRIMARY SOURCE OF FUNDS
Because once the contents of the ‘Safety Lock Boxes’ had been placed out of reach (they remain under heavily armed guard, we understand), a central source of illicit creative fraudulent financing (of terrorism) had suddenly been closed down.

That left the Bernard L. Madoff complex of fraudulent Ponzi financing operations, and its colossal portfolio of feeder Ponzi self-contained fraudulent finance carousels as the primary source for the continuing flow of corrupt funds needed to keep the overall carousel going, with the exception of the Alpha operation (and probably several others, including the Omega operations). In summary, with the London ‘vaults’ shut down, the Bernard L. Madoff complex became the primary open source of funds (with the exception, as noted of the Alpha operation et al).

FIVE-HOUR EMERGENCY MEETING BETWEEN MRS CLINTON AND GEITHNER
When margin calls arising from the implosion that occurred in mid-September, when the $14.0 trillion of LOAN money held within the Treasury custodial accounts was placed into ‘lockdown’ (on Friday 12th September 2008) following measures taken on 6th September 2008 and subsequently in Britain, the Madoff-linked feeder funds and thus Mr Madoff’s own operations collapsed under their own weight. On 20th September 2008, the Editor received the ‘triple gunshot voicemail’. On 22nd September, Senator Hillary Clinton met Timothy Geithner, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, for at least five hours, issuing a bromise statement afterwards implying that she had in fact been discussing ‘economic reform’ with Mr Timothy Geithner – whereas in reality this was an emergency meeting to discuss how on earth to prevent the exposure of the fraudulent finance operations in which both were and are implicated up to their necks – in light of the developments since 6th and 12th September, and the volume of margin calls that were ensuing.

NEW YORK FED AND S.E.C INVOLVED IN THE MASTER SCANDALS
Among the relevant sources of exotic fraudulent finance caught up in the consequent maelstrom were funds submitted by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York under Timothy Geithner to the Bank of New York Mellon and funds associated with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s own in-house proprietary trading account, mentioned in an earlier report.

• For the New York Fed and the SEC themselves to have been involved in these operations represents a colossal pair of parallel scandals which should trigger indictments of the primary characters involved at both institutions – starting with Christopher Cox and Timothy Geithner.

When the Federal Reserve opened up the swap doors, they were taking in quasi-fungible assets (Treasury guarantees) and exchanging them for Euros which could then be deployed within the Swiss exotic trading operations. This revolutionary nexus of fraudulent finance, of economic and ‘financial terrorism’ offensives, is so huge that it cannot be explained in depth at this stage.

However we can summarise some of the stages of this immense fraudulent finance operation – winding up with the resulting dubious derivative fake ‘assets’ outstanding being ‘guaranteed’ by the Depositary Trust Clearing (DTC) Corporation, owned by the largest clearing banks, which has boasted that it has handled transactions ‘worth’ $1.8 quintillion, and has ‘guaranteed’ up to $700 trillion of derivatives contracts outstanding (taking account of double-counting).

BIG BANKS REFUSING CLIENTS ACCESS TO THEIR OWN FUNDS (= THEFT)
It is reported to us by respected and responsible market sources that one very large British bank, one very large German bank and one very large Swiss bank, in particular, are among institutions which have formed the habit in recent weeks of illegally refusing to release funds when instructed to do so by clients holding accounts with these institutions.

A case involving the UK institution resulted in the removal of a senior bank officer (also a diplomat) from the institution on Monday 29th December 2008, after the funds had been transferred from the bank’s Far East office to London, to fund a certain transaction.

• These banks are hoarding funds not least because they may expect to be called upon to fund guarantees entered into on their behalf by the Depositary Trust Clearing (DTC) Corporation, as an ever-increasing volume of related transactions ‘goes sour’. This factor is exacerbating the impact of the banks’ own corrupt off-balance sheet financial transactions on the real economy, and is the primary cause of the banks’ ‘lending strike’.

For the designers, perpetrators, intermediaries and traders involved in this biggest of all financial scamming operations NEVER THOUGHT THAT THE CAROUSEL WOULD RUN INTO TROUBLE, just as Charles Ponzi assumed that his classic scamming operation following the First World War could be continued ad infinitum. All concerned had and retained a vested interest in the continuation of this corrupt money machine, which has come unwound and will continue unravelling, contrary to their naïve and greedy expectations.

OUTLINE INFORMATION ABOUT CAROUSEL TRANSACTIONS
If we consider the Securities and Exchange Commission’s corrupt own-account transactions and supposedly borrowed (but now shown, post-Madoff, to have been STOLEN) funds, as our starting-point source of funds in an illustrative flow-chart, various stages can be described as follows:

• Leveraging of the sourced funds 3:1 in the United States.

• Transfer of the proceeds to the Swiss-based corrupt and exotic financing factory and issuance of bonds by the likes of Lehman Brothers, AIG, Bank of New York Mellon, Citibank and Morgan Stanley (funding for the bonds obtained from the Switzerland ‘money factory’ and direct out of the SEC’s own-account operations) at an 18% purchase price, for onward selling with a 30% mark-up, yielding an absolutely colossal 48% overall spread.

• Funds sent to Spanish institutions, especially Sr. Botin’s corrupt Banco Santander (which bought inter alia Alliance and Leicester and Abbey National in the UK), and probably onwards to corrupt institutions in the Southern Cone of Latin America, where Bush people have been congregating.

• Onward selling of the bonds, with a 30% backhander to the Bushes and 70% to other participants, including and especially the Bernard L. Madoff operations:

Since Madoff’s entities issued their own client confirmations and statements, Mr Madoff was able to juggle and obfuscate them with false accounting – a fact of real life that would appear to have been recognised ahead of the Madoff collapse, by Kingate Global Management, one of the ‘feeder Ponzi funds’ and one of the largest such subsidiary funds which had attracted some $2.75-$3.50 billion for investment in and ‘management by’ Madoff Investment Securities, Inc, despite having warned its investors that the Madoff brokerages ‘could abscond with those assets’.

In its fund prospectus, Kingate had warned that ‘there was always the risk that the assets with the investment adviser could be misappropriated. In addition, information supplied by the investment adviser may be inaccurate or even fraudulent. The co-managers [viz., Kingate and Tremont: see the alphabetical list below] are entitled to rely on such information (provided they do so in good faith) and are not required to undertake any due diligence to confirm the accuracy thereof’.

• This approach allowed Madoff to falsify the confirmations and statements issued to his clients. The Madoff Ponzi Carousel diverged from the ENRON operation in that ENRON employed a huge transnational firm of accountants, whereas Madoff used part-time accountants.

In parallel with, complementary to, and derived from such ongoing ‘money machine’ transactions, corrupt US Treasury and Citibank terrorism financing operations operate in outline as follows:

• Collateralized Debt Obligations (Mortgage Debt Securities etc) derived from Carlyle, AIG, Bush fraudulent finance and other linked sources are taken into the US Treasury/Citibank financing sub-machine to fund the master rotating derivatives underwriting machine – with the resulting new Collateralized Derivative Operations (CDOs) being delivered e.g. into the back-room operation of the complicit Bank of England (run, in 2007 at any rate, by a Carl Daniels, out of Birmingham but probably also linked to the US Embassy in London).

• Bank of England issues loans against the CDOs which are fed back to Carlyle, AIG and the Bush-Clinton Fraudulent Finance Empire and Carousel.

And the resulting outstanding derivatives obligations are all ‘guaranteed’ by the bank-owned private corporation calling itself the Depositary Trust Clearing Corporation, WHICH IS WHY BIG BANKS HAVE PROBLEMS, AND MAY COLLAPSE IF THE NEW ADMINISTRATION MESSES UP.

‘RETAIL’ INVESTORS’ FUNDS STOLEN TO FINANCE CAROUSEL PONZI FRAUDS
The ‘package people’, like the Madoff investors, have all been ripped off, too: but most of them can’t reconcile themselves to this reality. Earlier this year, President Bush Jr. (43) was quoted as having uttered evil words which, in translation, meant that these people can shout and scream to their dying day, and they will never receive a single cent. Many of these unfortunate victims have died without coming to terms with the fact that they have been scammed by these very self-same high-level self-appointed corrupt élite financial terrorists and fraudulent finance criminals that are being exposed by this service, as the biggest financial criminal crisis in world history unravels.

They cannot enforce anything inter alia because of ‘non-disclosure’ documents that they may have signed, the nebulous identities of the parties with whom they entered into their transactions, and the fact that, wittingly or otherwise, they breached the old Prudent Man Rule, which is not a legal matter but an issue of prudence which would weigh against them in any court proceedings which cannot be brought because the Ponzi frauds were structured so that no-one could ever be held accountable. That’s what we meant by the ‘Never-Pay Syndrome’ – invented by George H. W. Bush Sr., the physical embodiment of Lucifer on earth, and the technician with whom he has fallen out, Dr Alan Greenspan, whom the Bushite CIA dogs have recently punished by pulling down the House of Madoff and making off with the trillions and trillions of dollars’ worth of proceeds (money ‘OUT’).

Meanwhile, to keep the middle-class US investor victims from reaching in unison for their guns in their attacks, an elaborate, cynical Psy-Ops operation has been mounted by CIA counterintelligence cadres through controlled outlets and their possibly unwitting disciples for years, to keep all these victims expecting resolution at the end of the rainbow.

But their money has long since been STOLEN, and incorporated into the vast revolutionary self-enrichment Ponzi money machine for the odious Luciferian globalist elite – even as members of this discredited class are at each others’ throats now that their immense system of Ponzi scams is sagging or crumbling, and as the Bush Crime Family and associates make haste to shovel as much illicit money down to the Southern Cone as can be achieved within the very short space of time left for these people before they reap the consequences of their unspeakably cruel, selfish, ruthless, criminal and reprobate behaviour.

The above should not be construed as meaning that ‘the ransacked’ have no eventual remedy: but their condition is unfortunately probably as parlous as the victims of the Madoff Ponzi takedown.

• Whoever denies this is de facto assisting the CIA’s evil ‘Psy-Ops’ operation against the victims.

OTHER HIDEOUS DIMENSIONS OF THE POISON OF THE OCTOPUS
Of course that dimension is only one segment among a myriad past and ongoing scams, many of which are focused on ripping off officially sponsored programs at a Federal, State, county and city level via the courts, schools, parks and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-related projects, foundations, charities, cemeteries, hospitals, welfare agencies, nursing and home health care operations, you name it. These scams involve inter alia the use of ‘Asset-Backed Securities Trust Pools’ (2006-HES) and ‘Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates’ (Series 20006-HES).

Details of such scamming have been dug up by investigators into horrendous ongoing property-related scams in Arizona linked to NAMED high-level criminalists, and separately began to emerge during a recent Cook County foreclosure, in which the Judge ordered the bank and the victim into the hallway to ‘work out a settlement’: evidently the Judge didn’t want the relevant information to be revealed in Court, probably because his name was on the list and he himself was implicated.

Literally thousands of companies are associated with this scamming operation, using Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) as the transfer vehicle. In essence, these criminals, consisting of attorneys, judges, bankers and others, are simply transferring properties without the owners’ knowledge, prior to foreclosure, with most of the accounts in question found to be held with Fidelity Investments, we have been informed. The stolen property then becomes available as collateral for further fraudulent finance operations.

‘MAINSTREAM’ AND COURTS CONCERNED, FOR NOW AT LEAST, ONLY WITH THE MONEY ‘IN’
Concerning the Madoff dimension, in the foregoing survey, it will have been noted that while an estimated $50 billion is said to have been ‘lost’ as a consequence of the collapse of the Madoff operations, untold trillions of dollars came out the other end.

To elaborate: the US and global ‘mainstream’ media, as well as the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and the Bankruptcy Court, are ostensibly (to begin with, at any rate) concerned with the estimated ‘losses’ of $50 billion which have been widely publicised, based on the many documents filed with the Court (of which the Editor, by visiting the Court, obtained a complete set extant up to 21st December 2008, during his pre-Christmas visit to New York).

But that’s just the money ‘IN’.

NONE OF THIS MONEY HAS VANISHED. IT HAS ALL BEEN STOLEN.

What about the money ‘OUT’?

This, of course, as revealed above, is of a far larger order of magnitude, given the following:

• Leveraging operations doubtless conducted by Bernard L. Madoff’s office itself, perhaps at 3: 1, within the United States.

• Leveraging operations consistent with the illicit fraudulent finance operations that are typically conducted by the Bush-Clinton fraudsters, up to 40:1 which will have been conducted through Madoff’s London office, with counterparties in Britain. Switzerland, Spain, Austria, France, etc.

By means of the usual high-yield investment program leveraging and hypothecation operations, the base $50 billion will long since have been converted into trillions of dollars; and it is confirmed that the proceeds were transferred in large part via Israel to the Southern Cone of Latin America (Paraguay, Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil), where significant numbers of Bush-linked operatives and associates are reported to us to be congregating.

Significant proceeds will also have been transferred to Russia and/or converted into untraceable, portable precious gems like raw diamonds, held in Rotterdam or in London lock boxes such as those at Coutts Bank, used as the money-laundering institution for the Blair-Bush Deutsche Bank-Vatican Bank financing operation brokered by Bernie Ecclestone and laundered through Coutts Bank, which is The Queen’s Bank, acting as the clearing house and providing the operation with false ‘legitimacy’ behind Her Majesty’s back.

As we have seen, far from Madoff‘s operations having been ‘stand-alone’ from the gigantic Bush-Clinton-CIA orchestrated fraudulent finance giga-scandal that is unfolding, therefore, they formed a prominent and integral part of the overall global fraudulent finance Ponzi scamming machine.

Furthermore, the methodology employed to STEAL ALL THE MONEY (THE TRILLIONS, NOT JUST THE BILLIONS), was the standard procedure used by the US criminal intelligence community in all previous such instances – namely, to implode the operation.

STANDARD ‘BCCI PROCEDURE’: COLLAPSE THE ‘MONEY MACHINE’, RAKE OUT THE MONEY
That’s what they did with BCCI, walking away with over $9.0 billion clear. That’s the same model as was applied in the cases of ENRON and Iceland. And that’s what Bush Sr. ordered in the Bernard L. Madoff case. By imploding Madoff, the crooks GET TO WALK AWAY WITH THE LOT.

• That’s the crucial reality that everyone is MISSING. THE MONEY HAS ALL BEEN STOLEN.

No doubt the timing of the Madoff takedown was influenced by the consequences of the implosive events of September 2008, which will have triggered the thought in the minds of the top criminalist strategists that it was now time to apply the ‘BCCI treatment’, i.e. to close down Madoff altogether, let all the subsidiary Ponzi schemes and their investors flounder, make off with the ‘money OUT’ in toto, and (in Bush’s mind) deliver a body blow to the Jewish community and Israel at the same time.

POSSIBLE ISRAELI TIT-FOR-TAT FOR THE BUSH-TRIGGERED MADOFF TAKEDOWN
IN RETALIATION for this Bush-sponsored ‘BCCI/ENRON treatment’ of the Madoff Ponzi carousel, the Israelis have leaked supposedly devastating money-laundering and bribery information showing how Mossad and other Israeli parties reportedly transfer money from the Israeli Government direct into active US Congressional campaign accounts (illegal foreign donations), with funds also being wired directly from Israeli Government bank accounts into active personal accounts of Members of Congress. The sources publicising this information reportedly received electronic files showing bank account numbers, bank routing numbers and account numbers for NAMED Members of the the US House of Representatives, the US Senate, and even elected officials in various States.

The incoming data allegedly showed routing numbers of the receiving banks revealing that certain Members of the US Congress and of the US Senate have bank accounts in places like Barbados, Liechtenstein, Switzerland, the Turks and Caicos Islands, the Cayman Islands and London.

Electronic file data sent over to source from Israel was said to reveal names of leading US law firms and dubious front corporations all over the United States. However, significantly, ABSOLUTELY NO CONCRETE DETAIL, SUCH AS ACTUAL BANK ACCOUNT DATA, had been published by the 4th January 2009, the initial outline surfacing via a non- anonymous website on New Year’s Eve.

Whether this data ‘firms up’ into hard information or not, the context in which it should be viewed at this stage is that it could represent a direct Israeli tit-for-tat ‘Psy-Ops’ operation in response to the body blow inflicted upon Jewish interests as a consequence of the Bush-Clinton-triggered Madoff takedown. We are well into the ‘Samson’ period now: the gloves are off everywhere.

Even if the data is not confirmed, it surfaced specifically in the context of the Madoff ‘takedown’, albeit clothed by the leak source as motivated by disgust at the onslaught against the Palestinians, of whom more than have been reported were stated to have died. The source added: ‘I intend to publish this information, including names, dates and account numbers, on the web’.

• By 4th January, an estimated 260,000 Palestinians lacked water and roughly the same number lacked electricity. Some 80% of the population relies on food aid, requiring 400 food trucks a day into the Gaza Strip. Only 100 trucks are being allowed in, according to the BBC.

STOKING UP ANTI-SEMITISM: A CYNICAL ‘ADDED BONUS’ FOR THE REVOLUTION
Now, on the back of this, Mr Bush Sr. and his fellow Nazis (notwithstanding that the Bushes are German Jews, originally) will have relished the prospect of destroying large numbers of competing Jewish foundations, investors, competitors, and other entities and enterprises – reducing Palm Beach, which was infiltrated and basically taken over by Americans of Jewish extraction from the 1960s onwards, to a state of near-hysteria, given that Jewish sources with whom we are in contact state that many Jewish investors there have been ‘wiped out’. We received a report (see below) of Jewish people in Palm Beach having been reduced to selling their Christmas/holiday presents in desperate hand-to-mouth attempts to raise liquidity.

• In an interesting by-product of this development, certain Jewish foundations that have been wiped out or rendered useless in the New York area, had been financing revolutionary agitprop operations promoting homosexual marriage and the usual array of leftish Gramsci-tradition cultural revolutionary abominations designed to destroy what remains of Christian standards and culture, a key objective of angry, deluded Babylonian revolutionary Jews: the takedown of these people has put a stop to these activities in some instances.

As a clear consequence of the revelations from the Madoff scandal so far, latent anti-Semitism (as anticipated by this service) has predictably intensified. On 20th December 2008, Agence France-Presse reported from New York that ‘anti-Jewish commentary is inundating the Internet following Bernard L. Madoff’s arrest on charges of masterminding one of the biggest Wall Street frauds in history’ [sic] – indicating of course that the media will continue focusing on the Madoff dimension, as intended, while the much bigger perpetrators behind Madoff consolidate their getaway with the ‘money OUT’ as described in outline here.

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) reported that there had been “an outpouring of ant-Semitic comments on mainstream and extremist websites”. The French agency cited an ADL statement that ‘site users have posted comments ranging from deeply offensive stereotypical statements about Jews and money – with suggestions that only Jews could perpetrate a fraud on such a scale – to conspiracy theories about Jews stealing money to benefit Israel’,

Abraham Foxman, National Director of ADL, elaborated:

‘Jews are always a convenient scapegoat in times of crisis, but the Madoff scandal and the fact that so many of the defrauded investors are Jewish has created a perfect storm for the anti-Semites. Nowadays, the first place Jew-haters will go is to the Internet, where they can give voice to their hateful ideas without fear of repercussions’.

Among entries reported to be featured in the electronic files referencing financial transfers from Israeli Government bank accounts to bank accounts in the United States is a series of entries showing transactions between Loh’ama Psichologit to the Anti-Defamation League in New York City. A Google search for Loh’ama Psichologit shows it to be the Literature and Propaganda segment of the Israeli intelligence organisation Mossad.

The Editor has a friend who is Education Director of a Jewish School and Synagogue in a certain US State. In discussion about the misbehaviour of certain people of Jewish extraction some years ago, the Editor pointed out that these people seemed intent on repeating the mistakes of the past and on stoking the latent fires of anti-Semitism. The Editor recalls his friend’s exact response:

‘Yes and these people cause our community immense concern all the time’.

Our unsolicited advice to Mr Foxman is that he should direct severe criticism publicly, or behind the scenes if he prefers, to his own community, and should issue grave warnings to these people about the prospective consequences of Jews being identified as perpetrators of financial frauds in the prevailing climate. The fact that almost all the identified victims of the Madoff scandal that have been identified to date are Jewish, misses the point – which is that no distinction is liable to be made in the minds of those criticising the Jewish community, between victims and perpetrators.

Likewise, in ‘a very worst-case scenario’ that history again repeats itself, no distinction whatsoever will typically be made between those Jews perceived to be villains, and righteous Jews. That is the danger on which Mr Foxman and his friends should be concentrating.

In case some people are still mystified as to why there is warfare among the Jews, may we remind you of the Editor’s old story about the nice lady who took pity on him when he was employed briefly with the merchant bank S. Japhet & Co., St Swithin’s Lane, in the City of London, in 1959. It was the time of the Eichmann trial. The middle-aged Jewish lady used to sit with your young correspondent occasionally in the canteen. To the Editor’s naïve question: ‘What’s this all about? Eichmann’s Jewish!’ the lady replied: ‘Didn’t you know? A Jew’s greatest enemy is another Jew?’

DOUBLE-MINDEDNESS AND THE DOUBLE-CROSS TRADITION
In addition, one must remain aware at all times, as this giga-criminal finance scandal continues to unfold, of the ‘double-mindedness dimension’ characteristic of all key operatives. These people are ALL double-minded, in direct contravention of Jesus Christ’s warning on this central issue:

• ‘The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single,
thy whole body shall be full of light’.

‘But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness.
If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!’
Matthew, Chapter 6, verses 22-23.

‘The light of the body is the eye: therefore when thine eye is single, thy whole body also is full of light; but when thine eye is evil, thy body also is full of darkness’.

‘Take heed therefore that the light which is in thee be not darkness’.
Luke, Chapter 11, verses 34-35.

One of the layers of deep meaning here is that double-mindedness is wholly evil and represents, therefore, TOTAL darkness. It is often noted that the criminals we identify can be quite pleasant to meet (albeit there is always a spooky dimension to all of them). But their fake ‘niceness’ masks the fact that their orientation is in fact the opposite. They pose as ‘reasonable’, ‘decent’ people, but their eye is evil: they are Dark Actors Playing Games. Furthermore, they employ the duplicitous dialectical method at all times. Hence, in summary, they routinely:

• Say one thing and do the opposite;

• Double-cross their collaborators and associates;

• Renege on all their undertakings; and:

• Relish application of the standard duplicitous intelligence community ‘bait and switch’
technique to entrap their targets.

Now George W. Bush Sr. ROUTINELY DOUBLE-CROSSES EVERYONE WITH WHOM HE DEALS, and there are NO exceptions to this rule. The same applies to his duplicitous son. So do not be in any way amazed, sceptical or scandalised that Bush Sr. and his criminalist intelligence associates will have specifically pulled the rug from beneath their collaborator, Bernard L. Madoff.

‘MADOFF TAKEDOWN’ RELEASED TRILLIONS TO BE STOLEN WITH EASE
On the contrary, this operation has released trillions of dollars (probably running into the hundreds of trillions) into the hands of the criminalist operatives directed by the Bush-Clinton-CIA Octopus, while at the same time destroying a large part of the Jewish community and delivering a bodyblow to Israel in the process. After all, Bush Sr., of German Jewish extraction, consorts with the Arabs.

Therefore so far as the ‘German’ element of the Octopus is concerned, the Madoff takedown has been a superbly ‘successful’ operation – releasing immense resources ‘free’ into its hands, while undermining Jewish elements in the process. Don’t forget, either, that each arm of the Octopus is permanently entwined with other arms, locked in struggles to the death – with every component of the Octopus at various times or simultaneously at loggerheads with or fighting other arms, or all of the arms. After all, Satan is the author of all lies and confusion, which is the stinking River Styx of death in which these world-class criminals operate.

• That they will all drown in its foul waters is a certainty.

GLOBALIST STRATEGISTS DESTABILISED BY SUCCESSIVE EXPLOSIONS
So, despite occasional confusing appearances to the contrary, the global financial showdown that we predicted is now blowing up in the faces of almost all the primary Illuminati cadres and figures, with linked secondary explosions going off at intervals at an ever increasing pace – leaving the criminalist participants, for the most part, staggering around shouting and snapping at each other incoherently. Even so, there are still some of their caste, equipped with fewer brain cells than their comrades-in-crime, who would appear to have not yet understood that there has been a decisive discontinuity, thanks to the relentless exposures, and that the criminal finance community have been rumbled, and are being progressively brought to their knees.

Their Dirkeim Paradigm – after Emile Durkheim [1858-1917], who postulated that criminal behaviour is humanity’s norm and that ethical conduct is anomalous – has been turned on its head, so that the criminalists are now increasingly seen to be the anomie, with the Rule of Law, however degraded and corrupt, starting to reassert its primacy in the United States, at least in patches.

This development, to which this service has contributed, has come as a nasty shock to those criminalists who have grasped the outline of what has happened, because they had been in the ascendancy and in control for 25 years, and truly believed that their Criminal Republic had been successfully established and could never be challenged, let alone dislodged.

They thought that their fake wealth factory, based on hypothecating often stolen or diverted assets up to 40:1 (in London, for instance), would continue for ever. And they imagined that no-one would or could ever stand up to them, given their long-term success in compromising, through blackmail and/or bribery, almost everyone on their darkened stage.

Instead of which the successive bombs that have gone off and continue to explode ‘unexpectedly’ in their faces (and will continue to do so for many years ahead) have disfigured their self-righteous images of false rectitude, so that the whole world can now see these double-minded, two-faced rats for what they are: the greedy, decadent scum of the earth who have had their filthy day, and large numbers of whom face (or are already serving) extended periods of imprisonment, with 25 years apparently the norm. Others have suffered ‘neutralisation’ – the currently fashionable euphemism for being bumped off.

UNPRECEDENTED ADMISSION BY THE IMF MANAGING DIRECTOR THAT ELITE IS TO BLAME
It is against this background that one of the most prominent members of the contemporary self-appointing élite, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, has actually become the first of their number to acknowledge publicly that an attempt really has been made by this self-same arrogant, globalist Elite Power Continuum, to steal the wealth of the whole of humanity for themselves.

Specifically, the Fund’s Managing Director warned in a speech given in Madrid on 16th December 2008 that ‘social unrest may happen in many countries – including advanced economies… Violent protests could break out in countries worldwide if the financial system is not restructured to benefit everyone rather than a small élite’.

In a BBC interview on 21st December, M. Strauss-Kahn said ‘we are in the biggest crisis we have experienced for 60 or 70 years’, and indicated that the IMF forecasts due in January 2009 would be even bleaker still. However as the Managing Director of the Fund knows that the underlying cause of the crisis is unfettered fraudulent finance, stealing and criminality, he is also well aware that no forecast that Fund’s experts may issue in the foreseeable future will capture the horrors in store – given that, in the face, for instance, of all our exposures, the US criminalists have CONTINUED with their fraudulent finance operations, long after they have been exposed in general terms, resisting implementation of the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme, which will implement capital markets transactions on-the-books to refinance the banks and to endow the US Treasury with a stream of windfall tax receipts on an ongoing basis.

The intention, up to the end of 2008 at any rate, was to apply the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme but to run it through the White House – where, of course, it would be corrupted and would immediately revert to corrupt debt-generating fiat money ‘business as usual’. As indicated above, this intention has been thwarted.

Never before has a member of that self-appointed élite openly warned that its own behaviour was risking a global upheaval: indeed, never before has a member of that élite even acknowledged that it exists as an organised force for evil. Those of us who have done our due diligence know this to be the case; but it is unprecedented for a superior member of the caste to agree with us. French journalists inform us that the highly intelligent IMF Chief is known for his clear thinking and for his commendable verbal precision and directness. One may deduce, therefore, that this observation represented a blunt warning to the few high-level criminalists who were still seeking to resist the inevitable as late as the Christmas week, that their behaviour cannot be tolerated any longer.

M. Strauss-Kahn’s remarks echoed those of another ‘insider’, Senator Christopher Dodd, Stalin’s grandson, who, commenting on the banks hoarding money, told The New York Times in October that ‘if it turns out that they are hoarding, you’ll have a revolution on your hands. People will be so livid and furious that their tax money is going to line their pockets instead of doing the right thing’.

‘There will be hell to pay’.

It would appear that even high-ups among the self-appointing globalist élite have realised that the most prominent criminalist operatives within the folds of the Octopus have overstepped the mark – threatening the collapse of the entire financial system, having chosen throughout the build-up to the present defining moment, to assume that certain banks faced liquidity problems, rather than a SOLVENCY crisis (of their own making, but a solvency crisis nonetheless).

It is unprecedented for representatives of the Illuminati-associated structures to issue warnings against their own fellow perpetrators.

BANKS HOARDING MONEY IN CASE DTC GUARANTEES ARE CALLED
Meanwhile, as the fragile world financial economy hovers on the brink of catastrophe with, as Senator Dodd has correctly gauged, the banks hoarding the funds that have been doled out by governments, the main issue early in January 2009 was: why are they doing this?

• The correct answer to this question is broader than the popular generic assumption that the banks are hoarding cash in order to avoid bankruptcy.

The reality was that the big complicit institutions have been hoarding fungible cash-cash to post against the vast derivatives exposures (see above) (on the working assumption that it cannot be that the guarantees will all have to be applied at once), in accordance inter alia with their stringent obligations under Basel-II. In the United States, the two institutions in the deepest trouble in this respect are Citibank and JP MorganChase.

These institutions have not only hoarded the cash dished out to them by the Treasury under the corrupt Henry M. Paulson Jr., which means that Mr Paulson has been bribing them to refrain from disgorging the Settlements funds, but have also, as repeatedly reported by this service, duly held onto and illegally presided over the exploitation of the $14 trillion on-the-books LOAN money made available to them for the sole purpose of financing the Settlements by Her Majesty The Queen, Prince Al-Aweed Al-Talal, and the Chinese parties.

These LOAN funds were made available by these highest-level parties in 2007 so as to finance the Settlements and thereby to provide the on-the-books resources to start the aforementioned G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme of capital markets transactions which will liquefy the banks on-the-books, while providing the Treasury with an ongoing cascade of tax receipts at 35% per annum out into the future – all ON THE BOOKS, as opposed to the prevailing Durkheim Octopus ‘system’ of debt-oriented legalised corruption which has resulted in the proliferation of unfunny money out to infinity stashed untaxed in offshore accounts for self-enrichment purposes and the financing of ‘Black Ops’ adventures and abominations.

• The LOAN funds, held from mid-September onwards in ‘lock-down’ so that they could not be used for ANY purpose other than to finance the Settlements, were lodged within the custodial group within the JPMorganChase US Treasury suspense account with Citibank.

When the $14 trillion LOAN funds were placed into lockdown effective 12th September 2008, they were at once subject to a stronger category of control than is implied by the word ‘frozen’, which we can certainly assert metaphorically to mean that tampering with one cent of such funds would be tantamount to an act of war.

As soon, then, as the said LOAN funds were placed into ‘lockdown’, the stock market and related sectors imploded and threatened to collapse. It then immediately transpired, given this collapse of the stock market during the week ending 19th September 2008, that the $14 trillion of LOAN funds had been illegally deployed to prop up the illicit US interbank carousel and to provide the base for leveraging and hypothecation operations – facilitating corrupt exotic ‘business as usual’, which was ‘why’ the Settlements had been delayed for a good 15 months beyond the approximate stage that the LOAN funds were first made available to replace the funds that had earlier been diverted, stolen and/or encumbered, including the $4.5 trillion that was provided by the People’s Bank of China in May 2006 referenced in our earlier reports.

The ‘lockdown’ of the LOAN funds, buttressed by the backwash from the London ‘Safety Lock Box’ raids on 2nd June 2008, has driven all subsequent events, forcing the US criminalists to the wall (where they risk being shot) and lighting the fuse for the series of bomb explosions, which will be prolonged and will continue for many years.

Unsurprisingly, it was on Saturday 20th September 2008, within days of the 12th September 2008 ‘lockdown’ of the $14 trillion, that the Editor of this service received the ‘triple gunshot voicemail’ reported earlier. It can now be revealed that the message conveyed by this macabre voicemail was this: ‘We will kill you for what you have done’.

CORRUPT ‘BUSINESS AS USUAL’ PLANS IN DISARRAY
However the outcome has so far been encouragingly different. In the first place, Robert Rubin, the Clintons’ Citibank-based financial ‘minder’ (guardian of the Clintons’ ill-gotten gains, including illicit profits derived from the exploitation of Her Majesty The Queen’s gold which was diverted during the ‘unscheduled’ British banking ‘black hole’ shutdown on 29th-30th March 2007) – was ordered to ‘get your … out of Citibank immediately’, in mid-December.

When we followed this intelligence up, we were advised that Rubin’s presence within this criminal enterprise being no longer required, he had been faced with no choice but to hasten for the exit. However as the ALPHA operation (and possibly other CIA covert criminal financing operations) are still running, one can take it as read that this hands-on fraudulent finance specialist is still up to his neck in related activities.

On 4th December 2008, The New York Post reported the progress of an investigation of the rôles of Mr Robert Rubin and the former Citibank CEO Chuck Prince in what the newspaper called ‘a Ponzi-style scheme that’s now choking world banking’, implying that some ‘mainstream’ journalists have belatedly been following this website after all. The report gave outline details of a Federal lawsuit by Citigroup investors represented by the law firm Kirby McInerney, which had produced a 500-page report alleging what the paper described as ‘a complex cover-up of toxic securities that spread across the globe, wiping out trillions of dollars in their destructive paths’.

Investor plaintiffs in the suit have accused Citigroup management of ‘overseeing the repackaging of unmarketable Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) that no-one wanted – and then reselling them to Citibank and hiding the poisonous exposure off the books in shell entities’.

The lawsuit stated that ‘when the bottom fell out of the shaky assets, Citigroup’s stock values collapsed, wiping out more than $122 billion of shareholder value’, but that Rubin and other top insiders cashed out for themselves via ‘suspicious’ share sales ‘calculated to maximize the personal benefits from undisclosed inside information’.

The investigation conducted by Kirby McInerney was applied to amend and add new details to a blanket investor lawsuit filed against Citigroup following the exposures by this service in the fall of 2007. Consequent upon our exposure of the recycling of the standard ‘Bernie Cornfeld’-style Ponzi scheme technique, the amended lawsuit called ‘the actions of Citi leaders “a quasi-Ponzi scheme” to hide troubles – and keep Citi stock afloat while insiders unloaded about three million shares’ between 1st January 2004 and 22nd February 2008 for huge profits.

The Complaint named Citigroup, Rubin, Mr Prince, Vice Chairman Lewis Kaden, ex-Chief financial Officer Sallie Krawcheck and her successor, Gary Crittenden. The suit specifically stated that Rubin cleared $30.6 million on his stock sales, while Prince cleared $26.5 million, former Chief Operating Officer Robert Druskin grabbed nearly $32 million and the former Global Wealth Management unit chief, Todd Thomson, enriched himself by $25.7 million.

• The significance of this case is that it adds to the pressure on the criminal enterprise on top of all the other pressures, including the ever-present possibility (at the time of posting) that the LOAN funds provided inter alia by Her Majesty the Queen might be called at any time.

SUCCESSIVE WAVES OF DEFAULTS OUT TO 2012-2014
The bombs set off by the events of last September are exploding all over the place, and they will continue exploding for the next four or five years as components of the nexus of financial fraud peak in succession (the so-called ‘sub-prime’ element being only the first of the megaton nukes to have exploded to date). Still to explode between 2009 and 2012/2013/2014 into a chasm of defaults, are other manifestations of the legalisation of financial corruption, such as Credit Default Swaps (CDSs) and all forms of securitised fake ‘assets’, Alternate A ‘assets’, and ‘Adjustables’.

In non-technical language, the Credit Default Swap overhang matures and peaks in 2009, while the derivatives ‘originated’ on the basis of other residential assets, commercial property, credit cards and auto loans will ‘peak’ in disorderly sequence between 2009 and 2012-14. This means that even when remedial circumstances such as the actual implementation of the on-the-books G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme do come on-stream, high-yield residual financial sector nukes will still be exploding ‘unexpectedly’, taking the ‘mainstream’ media by surprise, as usual. There is nothing to be done now about this state of affairs.

THE STRENGTHENING OF BARACK OBAMA’S POSITION
Ever since he was briefed by the FBI in Chigaco on the day following his election victory, President-Elect Barack Obama, who ‘blew up’ himself when the duplicity of associates was revealed to him on that and subsequent occasions and who soon came to understand that his prerogative to appoint whom he liked to serve in his Administration had been somewhat pre-empted for him by the prior construction of a shell Administration for the Elite Power Continuum for him to accept on a ‘take-it-or-leave-it’ basis, Mr Barack Obama has demanded finalisation of the Settlements.

And as noted, he has himself been responsible for two of the most critical appointments – to the leadership of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Office of Management and Budget.

THE FATE OF DELUDED HOLD-OUTS AGAINST THE SETTLEMENTS
As his position strengthened with the waning of the CIA’s sterile rearguard Bush-Cheney Internet campaign to discredit Barack Obama, and the Electoral College outcome on 11th December proved favourable to the President-Elect as expected, the President-Elect’s insistence on completion of the Settlements, to the fury of the Bush criminalists, has driven events at a hectic pace.

On Friday 18th December, Mr Obama warned that some 100 key people – including Attorneys whose firms must distribute the Settlement funds to the 1,000-odd Trustees for onward remittance – who have been protected hitherto, would cease to enjoy all immunity from the consequences of their complicity in financial crimes with effect from Monday 22nd December: indicative of the fact that if they were to impede the Settlements (as always, on the orders of Bush Sr.), they would be arrested, like the scores of bankers in Europe who have been arrested in successive waves over the past several weeks, and since the fall of 2007. On 18th December we received a report, for instance, to the effect that a further 12 ‘sleepers’ impeding the Settlements had been cuffed.

On 16th December 2008, it was reported/confirmed that five key Trustees in Europe had been arrested; and it is believed that these people were ‘taken down’ for prolonged periods.

• In addition, a not inconsiderable number of ‘sleepers’ and others taking orders from the imploding George Bush Sr. apparat have, in recent weeks been ‘neutralised’ – this being the currently fashionable euphemism for ‘liquidated’.

On 23rd December (5.35pm) the Editor was advised that a significant number of bankers and others had been ‘arrested’, taken away, ‘neutralised’ (liquidated) on the preceding day, in line with similar operations on the two preceding days and earlier. On 26th December 2008, it was confirmed to us that President Sarkozy, on behalf of all the European Union’s ‘Member States’, had issued ‘a final ultimatum’ to the criminalist US authorities for the Settlements payouts to be finalised by the end of the year (when Sarkozy’s six-month rotating EU Presidency came to an end), although as President of France, his ‘mandate to pay’ extracted from President George W. Bush at Camp David would not be affected (as the White House may have assumed). It was also confirmed to us from the United States that, despite everything that has happened, President George W. Bush STILL thought he was in charge of the Settlements process, given that the familiar blocking games played by the Bushes all along continued seamlessly following Sarkozy’ acquiring his ‘mandate to pay’.

On 28th December 2008, in a repetition of the familiar sterile obfuscating delay antics, a Trustee reported several instances of Trustees failing to turn up at banks for payouts, as has often been reported all along (one of the standard sabotage techniques) and that ‘they are working furiously to get everyone in place’, with ‘feelings really frayed right now’ – not that they have not been frayed ever since this service became involved with this crisis.

But for such a source to mention ‘frayed feelings’, giving the standard habit of understatement, reflected the extreme fractiousness of the situation, which has led to many sudden deaths, with more in the pipeline, according to our information. However, so successful has the Bush-Cheney disinformation, diversion, expectations-manipulating ‘Psy-Ops’ apparatus been throughout this coordinated operation to scam every target imaginable, that none of this unspecific ‘information’ can ever be relied upon: it is foolhardy for people to do so. Such ‘information’ can only become reliable when backed up by indpendent sources, as in the case of the jailed bankers in the UK.

The authorities under the incoming Administration would have the option of foreclosing on both Citibank and JPMorganChase in the event (as appeared to be the case immediately ahead of the Christmas holidays) of their continued intransigence, after partial completion of the Settlements in favour of ‘the countries’ on Thursday 18th December, which was the date when the US Treasury guaranteed value and the country recipients were said to have been ‘paid out’.

SHOUTING MATCH OVER PAYOUTS TO U.S.-BASED RECIPIENTS
But when it came to paying out the US-based recipients, the Editor gathered that a blazing row, or ‘shouting match’ developed, involving recalcitrant American refusals to disgorge tranches of the LOAN funds to US recipients. This row may have focused inter alia on the illegality of Citibank and other institutions even contemplating further misapplication of elements of the $14 trillion in ‘lockdown’ which could NOT be touched except for Settlements disbursement purposes.

According to our sources, the explosive international slanging and shouting match started on Friday 19th December 2008, when the US tranches of the Settlements were stalled, and was still continuing on Saturday 20th December, immediately ahead of the Editor’s return to London from New York on Sunday 21st December.

In the second place, the bailout providing loans worth $17.4 billion to Detroit automakers reflected NOT the desperate plight of the US motor manufacturers, but rather alleged EXTREME FEAR in the White House and the Treasury that if General Motors and Chrysler were to be placed into Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the consequent investigations would expose the fact that these household names’ balance sheets are stuffed with fraudulent securitised derivative assets, and that their accounts had been falsified for years since such dubious assets had been treated for accounting purposes as though they are ‘real’ assets – which is not the case, as they are worthless, although the system of legalised corruption dictates otherwise.

UGLY SITUATIONS FACING KEY PLAYERS
Any Trustee appointed under Chapter 11 procedures would be bound to report such information, which would set off colossal further aftershocks throughout the financial system, coming on top of the Madoff takedown which will continue setting off landmines way out into the future, despite any evidence of ‘insider’ attempts to contain the fallout – not least within the offices of the Securities and Exchange Commission, which allowed these corrupt practices to flourish (even as the SEC has been participating in the fraudulent finance trading operations on own account), in the context of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 and the associated weakening of the stringent US securities legislation of 1933 and 1934, which, however, still applies and should have been enforced.

The fact that the Deposit Trust Clearing Corporation (DTCC) has been ‘guaranteeing’ these false securitised ‘derivatives’ assets, and has even boasted about clearing $1.8 quintillion of such junk as noted above, does NOT ‘guarantee’ the ‘value’ of such assets, given that they are intrinsically worthless: it simply confirms that the legalisation of US financial corruption has comprehensively failed to disguise the real-world reality that such false ‘assets’ are both illegitimate AND worthless, even though the legitimisation of corruption prescribes the opposite.

DECISION TO APPLY THE ‘BCCI/ICELAND/ENRON TREATMENT’ TO MADOFF
In the third place (but perhaps slightly in the wrong order), on Thursday 11th December, which we believe is about when the carousel finally ran out of fresh ‘IN’ resources altogether – as the events of mid-September had led to the drying-up of the secondary market, thus precluding the tapping of the secondary and tertiary markets for prop-up funds – all of the leading corrupted financial players suddenly discovered, in sync, that the cupboard was bare. Faced with this prospect, the Bush Sr. Crime and CIA criminal enterprise apparat is believed to have decided to apply the ‘BCCI treatment’ to the Madoff Ponzi scamming machine and its subsidiary Ponzi operations – just as it had earlier pulled the plug on ENRON and, more recently, Iceland, a conveniently located fraudulent finance platform established/exploited by Bushite associates (e.g. Khaled Aziz, Hospice Trust, etc).

The routine practice appears to be that as soon as one of these Ponzi fraudulent finance carousels reaches a tipping point, the criminal finance engineers deliberately allow the fake money machine to implode, rakes all the cash out for itself, and leaves all the deluded investors and (in this case) the subsidiary Ponzi investor funnels dangling, like the ‘package people’.

One consequence of this development was that lame-duck President George W. (Dog) Bush Jr. was reported to have asked his lawyers whether he could continue to stall on the Settlements (so that he could wind up stealing some more money) and what would the likely consequences be for him personally if he did so. Our sources informed us that his corrupt lawyers responded words to the effect: ‘Well, you’ve got away with it so far, so what’s the problem?’

By responding corruptly in this manner, the President’s co-conspiratorial Attorneys revealed how far behind the curve and how compartmentalised they have remained, since the reality is that Bush II has NOT ‘got away with it’ and is manifestly defeated and stretched flat out on the rack, despite theatrical appearances to the contrary. The Bushes may THINK that they have raked out all the money and have ‘won’, but as explained above, they are liable to lose the lot.

In any case, since President Sarkozy obtained his ‘mandate to pay’, the outgoing President Bush has not been in control of events, even though it is clear from this episode and from his behaviour generally that he thought he was still in charge. Maybe it all depends on his daily intake.

BELATED OPERATION TO DISCREDIT PRESIDENT SARKOZY
Meanwhile an operation was noted in December 2008 apparently to destabilise President Nicolas Sarkozy and to place him under a cloud, focused on the huge Clearstream corruption and money-laundering scandal that has grown a new leg – with inter alia the revelation, extracted from widely available Clearstream historical spreadsheets, that Sarkozy holds or held two secret accounts in false names, Paul de Nagy and Stéphane Bosca. We were suspicious of this sudden eruption, given that the ‘intelligence’ proffered and pilfered for international public consumption was extracted from documentation that has been circulating for several years; so it represented nothing new.

But specifically, it was reported on 18th December 2008 that Sarkozy might soon be facing renewed charges that he was at the receiving end of corrupt foreign funds through the Luxembourg-based Clearstream entity. President Sarkozy’s father’s full name was M. Nicolas Paul Stéphane Sarkösy de Nagy-Bosca. The Clearstream money-laundering scandal connects directly with American political and ‘Black Ops’ financing operations through Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), Banco Ambrosiano (the Vatican: see the preceding report), Bahrain International Bank (associated with the deceased – as of 26th December 2001 – Osama Bin Laden), and Bank Menatep, the KGB entity previously headed by the disgraced and then imprisoned covert Soviet KGB operative and oligarch and former minor Gorbachëv-era Minister, Mikhail Khodorkovsky.

The Clearstream data of which this service has been aware for several years contain accurate information, indicating that allegations by the Sarkozy entourage that the spreadsheets that have been in circulation for the past several years are forgeries, are false. M. Sarkozy was reported in February 2007 and earlier to have received corrupt funds from Zug-based Marc Rich, a.k.a. Hans Brand, the long-range DVD operative and corrupt financier who was notoriously ‘pardoned’ by President Clinton during his last hours in office (see above). The man who is now President of France was also alleged in 2007 to have received funds from Russian-Israeli mafiya accounts of Bank Menatep. However the ‘surfacing’ of this OLD intelligence is obviously suspect.

WHAT PRESIDENT BUSH JR. WAS REALLY UP TO IN BAGHDAD: TRYING TO STEAL MONEY
On Saturday 13th December, Bush Jr. appeared in Baghdad where, on 16th December 2008, he narrowly escaped being hit on the head by what have become the most famous footwear items in history – thrown by Muntadhar al-Zaidi, the courageous Iraqi TV journalist working for al-Baghdadia satellite TV station, who followed and reported on the US Apache helicopters’ trails of death and destruction, and has been a relentless exposer of the gross, Nazi-style abominations and atrocities committed by the US forces in Iraq. Throwing one’s shoe at a person is the ultimate insult in the Arab world and also anywhere in Europe from Austria eastwards.

The first airborne shoe was accompanied by the following pertinent imprecation:

‘This is the farewell kiss, you dog’.

At least, that is what was widely reported. Less widely reported was what the journalist shouted to accompany the arrival of the second airborne shoe:

‘This is from the widows, the orphans and those who were killed in Iraq’.

As the Iraqi and Arab satellite stations broadcast this expression of pent-up fury and outrage at the brutality of the invading and occupying US forces, and of the CIA’s cadres with their hideous ‘Black’ abominations from Abu Ghraib onwards, regional TV stations and media websites were inundated with messages of adulation. The Guardian summarised the content of these messages thus:

‘Bush is a mass murderer and a war criminal who sneaked into Baghdad. He killed a million Iraqis. He burned the country down’.

Ostensibly, ‘the Dog’ was in Baghdad to sign off on the negotiated troop withdrawal arrangements, this being presumably Bush II’s final Iraq-related act as the most despised US President in history. But in actual fact, what Mr Bush was really more interested in, was stealing money.

• Two impeccable sources informed us on 16th December 2008 that he attempted to steal a large sum while in Iraq, only to be informed that the funds had been placed beyond his reach, under the protection of the World Court.

So the workings of the devious mind of this cunning little criminal dog-snake had been anticipated in advance, given that it would have been known that he was to make a flying visit to Baghdad over the weekend of 13th-14th December 2008 (even though the visit was ‘secret’). Mr Bush’s failure to steal money from the Central Bank of Iraq or indeed from any other component of the Iraqi financial infrastructure may account for the man’s ‘crushed’ appearance during subsequent TV broadcasts.

NO DENIAL OF THE MORGAN STANLEY TERRORISM FINANCING CENTER
While all this was developing, our report exposing the office suite within Morgan Stanley known from the relevant investigation in 2007 to be the Terrorism Financing Center specialising in the financing of the projection by the corrupt revolutionary United States of secret ‘Black Ops’ global terrorism operations headed by the US-created hydra called Al-Qaeda, had already been in the public domain for OVER THREE WEEKS. This exposure, which stemmed from our knowledge that the Provost Marshal was refused entry to this office suite with his accompanying personnel when he attended Morgan Stanley’s premises in October 2007, and from the findings of the subsequent official but unreported investigation, prompted the following response:

• NO RESPONSE AT ALL:
From any of the CIA-controlled disinformation or confusion-mongering websites, which obviously, being CIA-backed outlets, could not ‘touch it’, with one exception. It was suggested by an observer that the breaking of this information was worthy of a Pullitzer Prize (although simple Brits don’t really understand what on earth that is). The comment was accompanied by the add-on that ‘it had better be true, or one wouldn’t want to be in Story’s shoes’. Well, Story remains, at least as of the time of writing, in the new shoes that he bought in order to be properly dressed for his fourth daughter’s candle-lit wedding in our 11th century parish church on 13th December 2008.

• NO REFUTATION WHATSOEVER from any Fourth or Fifth estate source. Manifestly, if the report were untrue (which is not the case!), it would have been necessary at some stage to discredit it. But this has not happened, because the report is true, as you would expect.

Now it is a fact that this information, which had been known for over a year by our sources, who had previously been precluded from revealing it to us, was made available for a very good reason. Even though, as indicated above, the report has so far been confined to this website, that doesn’t matter because of the website’s immense global coverage. The reality is that this information is out in the public domain, so that governments worldwide have picked it up and know the truth of the matter (if it had been withheld from them by their penetrated intelligence services).

AL-QAEDA WILL HAVE TO BE CLOSED DOWN: BY BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
It can therefore only be a matter of time before Al-Qaeda is wound up.

• And who do you suppose has been positioned to achieve just that outcome?

• Why, Barack Hussein Obama, of course. Let us explain, in case this is not clear.

Treating the 25 years of the Reagan-Bush-Clinton ascendancy as the Thesis (Clinton has all along ‘worked for’ Bush Sr., but carries the opposite (dialectical) political label), we are now presented with the purported Antithesis under President Barack Obama.

• Although the Elite Power Continuum remains in place, the team members have been switched.

The socialist-internationalist British Prime Minister Gordon Brown pronounced on 14th December that Al-Qaeda was planning 20 separate terrorist attacks on civilian targets in the United Kingdom. However being also a blackmailable intelligence officer, Mr Brown knows perfectly well, or should know, that Al-Qaeda has been financed inter alia via the Morgan Stanley-based Terrorism Financing Center (our name for the abominable suite within that corrupt financial enterprise in Midtown New York City). It therefore follows that Brown may be a duplicitous deceiver who knows the truth but hasn’t got the guts to expose it, because he is being blackmailed, or is just plain ignorant due to compartmentalisation or because his handlers have been instructed to leave him in ignorance – which might be the sort of behaviour to be expected from the current Germanophile head of MI6.

As a result of the London ‘safety lock box’ raids conducted by 300 armed Metropolitan Police officers on 2nd June 2008, details of certain secret offshore bank accounts with Henry Ansbacher, British Virgin Islands, a preferred DVD money-laundering and bribery payment recipient bank, were discovered. This fact places a questionmark over the futures of certain key UK figures.

Another possible explanation for Brown’s remarks would be that they represented a feeble attempt to discredit our report: evidently, Mr Story’s exposure of the Morgan Stanley Terrorism Financing Center ‘cannot be true, because why would Morgan Stanley be interested in mounting 20 attacks against America’s supposedly closest ally’?

Anyone who thinks like this hasn’t begun to grasp:

(a) That the so-called ‘Special Relationship’ has been degraded and corroded by the wayward and relentlessly evil operations of the DVD segment of the US Intelligence Power; and:

(b) That the deviousness of the evil DOUBLE-MINDEDNESS of these people is infinite: they have NO WAY of combating the truth other than with more lies. IF YOU HAVEN’T UNDERSTOOD THE DOUBLE-MINDEDNESS DIMENSION BY NOW, YOU’LL NEVER UNDERSTAND ANYTHING.

Anyway, our revelation of the existence of the Morgan Stanley Terrorism Financing Center also represented yet another HORRIBLE BOMB EXPLOSION in the faces of the recalcitrant criminalist revolutionary perpetrators, since, by definition, it signalled not only that Al-Qaeda would have to be wound up, but, even more to the point in our context, that:

• The United States’ reprobate and wholly inexcusable covert ‘Black Ops’ financing of terrorism worldwide through Morgan Stanley and possibly other criminalist US institutions, will have to be wound up, as well. This follows because now that this report has of course remained unchallenged, the US Government has come under pressure, and will remain under intensified pressure, from governments, other observers and this service, to close down these revolutionary abominations, and to make haste in doing so. The ‘discontinuity’ afforded by the arrival of a properly elected and validated (by the US Electoral College) new Administration (albeit the controlled Antithesis to the preceding Thesis), especially a man of Mr Obama’s ethnic background, provides the deliberately prearranged DIALECTICAL opportunity to achieve this desirable outcome.

We can leave our disgust and justifiable fury at the hideous behaviour of the revolutionary US Government and its ruthless Intelligence Power as a promoter and projecter of terrorism, to later.

FOLLOWING OUR MULTIPLE EXPOSURES, DVD NOW SAID TO BE ‘BITTERLY DIVIDED’
Recalling that the Intelligence Power controls the US Government, not the other way round, it can be seen that the Bush-directed neocon (Trotskyite/DVD) intelligence community’s ‘Faction A’ which has been surreptitiously promoting the World Revolution and causing mayhem around the world, is being superseded by an ‘opposing’ faction, which will now set about dismantling the worst features of the run-away revolutionary madness sponsored by Faction A.

The genies that the outgoing team’s evil people have let out of the bottle include the DELIBERATE ongoing CIA-originated radicalisation and mindless indoctrination of Pakistani youth, so that a huge swathe of that country, like Afghanistan, is in the hands of armed gangs, as is the case for the same underlying reason in large areas of Africa.

Given that the routinely treacherous British Foreign Office has a team in Rawalpindi which recruits Pakistani immigrants to the United Kingdom (each agent is said to be required to fulfil his quota of 15 Pakistani immigrants per working day, on a bonus basis), it is self-evident that elements of the British Government structures, by importing Pakistanis into Britain en masse, are actively engaged in working with the (DVD) enemy to destabilise the United Kingdom which they are supposed to be serving. This is among many such grotesque revolutionary aberrations that have come to light through recent forensic research by analysts whose brains have not yet been ‘washed’.

Such operations were originally masterminded by the Bush-linked DVD-servicing component of the corrupted US Intelligence Power, but have now all reached the ‘maximum chaos’ level and are in growing jeopardy, as we understand that, following our exposures (specifically), the Dachau-based DVD, related to Bush Sr.’s hellish activities, is now bitterly divided.

More and more of the DVD’s filthy operations are being exposed, including the transfer of little girls along with drugs and nuclear components by submarine, for unloading at a northern German port (where little girls have been photographed by clandestine operatives, being disgorged from one of the submarines in question).

DVD’S BRUSSELS BLACKMAIL UNIT AIMED AT EUROPEAN COMMISSIONERS: DG1-X
We now report a further dimension of DVD’s operations, which hopefully will accentuate additional splits in the ranks of German intelligence. The Brussels-located component of this shadowy ‘Black’ Nazi strategic deception continuum agency, labelled DG1-X, is hereby exposed. DG1-X specialises solely in compromising European Commissioners, which it divides into the following categories:

• European Commissioners susceptible to paedophile compromise for blackmail purposes; Subsidiary question: Do they prefer little boys or little girls? Refer back to our exposé of the President of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso, in the DVD exposure report published in October 2008.

• European Commissioners susceptible to the standard honey-trap operation for blackmail purposes (provision of women).

• European Commissioners susceptible to the standard bribery/financial compromise operation for blackmail purposes (money-trap operations).

As we all know, other agencies ‘do this stuff’, as you will have read elsewhere recently on this website; and not all of them are ‘Black’. But the significance of this DVD unit is that it operates in Brussels specifically to target European Commissioners, who of course are away from home when they are stuck in the distinctly gloomy Belgian capital.

• The reason for the existence of DG1-X in Brussels is that the modelling of the European Union as a COLLECTIVE, in order to obscure the underlying intention for it to be controlled by Germany and to represent, ultimately, ‘Greater Germany’, as per the blueprint originally specified in ‘Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft’ [1942, Berlin], necessitated the incorporation of an add-on mechanism for ensuring that European Commissioners could always be relied upon to do Germany’s bidding. DG1-X probably targets other EU personnel as well as Commissioners.

• FACT: When the Editor recited this information of late on the transatlantic telephone line, the connection was immediately severed. This always indicates that what is being said is accurate (routinely showing what fools the eavesdroppers are).

THE MADOFF HYDROGEN BOMB EXPLODES
The next nuclear explosion to disfigure the faces of the Workers of Darkness was the subsidiary Octopus Master Ponzi Scheme run by Bernard L. Madoff, who was arrested at about 8.30 am in his Manhattan apartment on 64th Street on 11th December 2008. In an extensive report dated the 20th December and entitled ‘Madoff Scheme Kept Rippling Outward, Crossing Borders’, The New York Times ploughed methodically through the office press cuttings file, characterising Madoff’s self-confessed giga-scam as ‘the first Global Ponzi Scheme in history’ – which is of course NOT TRUE, since George H. W. Bush Sr.’s Octopus operations represent a whole universe of exported Ponzi schemes. But the article, which covered more than two huge full pages in the newspaper, and was only concerned with the money ‘IN’ (see above), did an excellent job assembling details of Madoff’s domestic and international connections, which were almost 100% Jewish.

As we have seen, Bernard L Madoff was recruited by George W. Bush Sr. to run ‘his’ money. After the $14 trillion was placed into ‘lockdown’ during the week ending on 17th September 2008 (see above), Madoff’s firm started to encounter massive redemption demands.

Bearing in mind that the funds, once transferred abroad, for instance to London, could then be leveraged 40:1, the pressure faced by Madoff related not just to originally invested funds, but impinged upon much larger sums of money which could not be accessed because they had been routinely transferred out to offshore tax havens and to Israel and then onwards inter alia to the Southern Cone of Latin America – Paraguay, Uruguay, Argentina and Brazil – where many of the key dogs and rats are now congregating, to satisfy Bush Sr., who demanded his payoff and pound of flesh at the Jews’ expense. The Madoff takedown, in short, represented another George Bush Sr. operation to claw back the immense sums he lost at an earlier stage of the crisis for which he is responsible, inter alia via naked shorts, as reported by this service.

It can be seen, too, that the destruction of Madoff was a George Bush Sr. ‘BCCI/ENRON takedown-type’ operation designed effectively to take down Israel itself – Mr Bush Sr.’s revenge against Alan Greenspan, his former technician, with whom, as our exposures gathered momentum, he had fallen out (new information). As noted, every cited victim of the Madoff implosion is Jewish.

The United States Court proceedings deal, and are likely to continue addressing, just the money originally invested (the money ‘IN’) – not the money leveraged off the base funds, which amounts to trillions and which would appear, according to our own special sources (not secondary Internet sources) to have been channeled extensively THROUGH Israel, as has been stated, en route to South America, for the benefit of the Bushrats congregating there.

In other words, the Bushrats are not only fighting each other and their double-crossed Jewish associates inside the sack, but have essentially burned the sack (their boats) as well. The colossal transfers to Israel for onward transmission to the Southern Cone, were monitored in real time.

MADOFF RECRUITED BY, AND ‘WORKED FOR’, BUSH/CIA PONZI CRIME APPARAT
Madoff’s operations could not have been possible without, and were assisted by, insider traders associated with the Octopus operations linked to the Bush-Clinton Crime nexus. The New York Times’ article showed clearly how the scam operated, with a key mechanism being Mr Madoff’s success in hitching other, subsidiary Ponzi Scheme investment scamming operations – such as Ascot Partners (led by J Ezra Merkin), Fairfield Greenwich Group (headed by Walter M. Noel and Jeffrey Tucker, who has said that the firm worked with Madoff for 20 years), Tremont Group, and Maxam Capital Management, which enjoyed steady annual profits averaging 8%-12% and which directed a constant stream of new investors into Madoff’s clutches.

Since we now know that Madoff ‘worked for’ Bush Sr. in his later years, the leveraged proceeds from the inflowing funds that were multiplied and consistently maximised, were in the main kept abroad, while the entities and individuals listed below were paid from new incoming funds placed by new investors or by existing investors who increased their investments, with the actual Ponzi scheme related essentially to the principal monies invested, only. So gargantuan was the greed associated with this operation, that the externally generated funds were retained offshore (they could hardly be repatriated without attracting attention and without courting mandatory IRS tax evasion investigations), while the ‘IN’ money was repaid, or returns on it were paid, from new ‘IN’ money. The ‘OUT’ money was effectively an entirely separate operation.

Of course the ‘returns’ paid to investors did not reflect actual investment outturns, but rather rigged numbers falsified to enable the ‘managers’ to deliver the Ponzi-style returns expected.

In other words, there were two parallel master operations: the use of the base funds for external (40:1) leveraging, hypothecation, high-yield investment programmes and the like, with the created proceeds stashed offshore, as usual, untaxed and off-balance sheet; and the Ponzi scheme and its subsidiary Ponzi Schemes revealed in the existing Court documents, whereby earlier investors were repaid and interest was paid with funds provided by later investors. The hidden operation, concerning which Mr Madoff was reported by his elder son to be ‘cryptic’, was the Bush-related sink-hole. The Court documents imply that Madoff ‘kept several sets of books’.

We speculate that Madoff succumbed to recruitment by George Bush Sr. because he calculated that the massive hypothecated fiat money accruals generated by participating in the Bush-related off-balance sheet transnational fraudulent finance operations could be tapped so as to perpetuate his ‘on-the-books’ Ponzi Scheme activities, which he had been running long before George Bush Sr. operatives recruited him. However when Bush Sr. suddenly (we are informed) made demands consistent with a Bush ‘BCCI/ENRON takedown’ decision to ransack Madoff’s operations, to rake out all the money, to destroy his Jewish participants and inflict massive harm on the State of Israel, this means of supporting the increasingly vulnerable Ponzi Scheme ceased to be available.

Separately, we have repeatedly pointed out in these reports that all get-rich-quick ‘humanitarian’ and ‘prosperity’ programs which may have enticed participants to ignore the Prudent Man Rule with promises of mouth-watering returns, represented traps for the unwary. The original Charles Ponzi story has been posted several times with these reports, and is reposted below (3).

‘MADOFF TAKEDOWN’: A VAST SMOKESCREEN ‘PROTECTING’ THE GIGA-CROOKS
Before considering some of the Court documents associated with the Madoff ‘takedown’ operation, the matter must be placed firmly in the much broader context of the Bush-Clinton-CIA/DVD Criminal Cadres’ ruthless ransacking operations to steal as much of other people’s coveted possessions and wealth by reprobate means as possible, in order to sustain the criminalist community’s status as arbiters of both the future of humanity and of the mad World Revolution to reorder human affairs in accordance with their own sick preferences. And when we examine the clues left by the Madoff implosion operation, it becomes perfectly clear that this is an integral component of the offensive against humanity directed by the most ruthless network of gangsters to have been sicked up by the human race. The clues are quite specific, too.

According to our Palm Beach correspondent, desperate Jewish householders have been trying to sell their Christmas/holiday presents to raise cash, as their liquidity has been reduced effectively to zero. Others have been despeartely engaged in short-selling of their homes, only to find that the bankers they deal with, don’t want to know. Many people in Palm Beach, our informant says, have been literally ‘wiped out’. And the perpetrators of this ‘takedown’ have STOLEN both the money ‘IN’ and as indicated above, the much more prolific money ‘OUT’, in accordance with THE STANDARD PATTERN employed by the giga-crooks since at least the ‘classic’ CIA takedown of BCCI.

Other instances of the application of this technique, involving the hollowing-out of the target, to be followed by the deliberate, preplanned triggering of its collapse after all the ‘free money’ has been raked out, can indeed be seen to include ENRON, Iceland, even Ireland (if you look closely at the structure of that country’s balance-of-payments), and now the Madoff enterprises.

Looking at ‘Madoff’ in this broader perspective, we can see with ease that Bernard L. Madoff is just the shill: there is always a shill. He ‘had it good’ for years: now it’s his turn to take the full rap. If he winds up in jail for the rest of his life, what is that to the big criminals behind the curtain? If several people get killed, as happened with the takedown of Enron, what is that to the giga-crooks? If the people of Iceland starve and shiver in the cold, who cares, given that the country’s entire financial system has long since been ransacked and hollowed out?

In addition, the Madoff Ponzi system ‘implosion’, which was directly linked to the consequences of the London ‘Safety Lock Box’ raids on 2nd June 2008 and the placement of the $14.0 trillion into what we have described as ‘lockdown’ on 12th September 2008, as sources of replacement funds effectively dried up from mid-September onwards (the London-based stolen and illicit collateral having been neutralised), serves the following purposes in the interests of the giga-crooks:

• A diversionary purpose: Everyone is looking directly at the Madoff case, becoming entangled and confused by the spaghetti junction of confusing sub-cases, litigation, Court documents, SEC, FINRA and SIPC investigations: which is JUST WHAT THE GIGA-U.S. CROOKS WANT. After all, they have got away with the BIG MONEY, they have hollowed out the Master Ponzi Scheme and all its subsidiary Ponzi operations, and they urgently need the benefit of the cover so helpfully now provided by the MADOFF SMOKESCREEN, for two reasons:

(1) To ensure that no-one looks BEYOND the Court documents to grasp what has happened.

(2) To ensure that no-one looks into the criminal finance operations these people have been up to inside Citibank. In this connection, we interrupt this sequence with a reference to some comments attributed to Sir Win Bischoff, the Chairman of Citigroup, during a New Year’s Day broadcast on the BBC’s domestic Radio 4 Today Programme.

Asked the usual knee-jerk BBC question: ‘Who is really to blame for the crisis?’ (this question is asked repeatedly because none of these journalists can get it into their heads that this is 100% about ORGANISED FINANCIAL FRAUD AND NOTHING ELSE), Sir Win responded as follows:

‘My view is that they [bankers] are partly to blame. There are people who feel remorse about this: there’s no doubt about it. Do they all? I don’t know…. It is very important for banks not to deny that they carry some of the can, whether that’s 50 cents on the dollar, that is their responsibility, or 60 or 40’. Now remember that Sir Win is CHAIRMAN OF THIS HUGE BANK. WHAT DOES THIS IMPLY?

• A possible insider control purpose: When we examine the Court papers (the earliest filed Court documents were assembled from the US Court by the Editor), we discover that CONTROL OF THE EXPOSURES MAY BE CONTAINED ‘within the system’. There are several clues to this possibility:

(A) Court Document #2 [Securities and Exchange Commission COMPLAINT vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791 (LLS): Appointment of Receiver, Lee Richards, of Richards Kibbe & Orbe LLP ‘over all the assets and accounts of defendant Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“BMIS”) outside of the United States, to take control forthwith over BMIS’s dealings and transactions with any non-United States entity or counterparty, with full access to BMIS’s books and records necessary or useful to him in the exercise of his powers over BMIS’s foreign business or transactions’ signed by United States District Judge Louis L. Stanton at 6.42pm on 12th December 2008: plus:

Court Document #3: Securities and Exchange Commission ORDER vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791 (LLS) ECF Case: Order to show cause, Temporary Restraining Order and Order Freezing Assets and Granting Other Relief; Order consented to by defendants and therefore signed off by United States District Judge Louis L. Stanton at 4:51pm on 13th December 2008.

Court Document #2 appoints LEE RICHARDS, of Richards Knibbe & Orbe LLP, as ‘receiver over all the assets and accounts of the defendant Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“BMIS”) outside of the United States’, while Court Document #3 appoints LEE RICHARDS, of Richards Knibbe & Orbe LLP ‘as receiver for the Defendants’ assets, including, without limitation, Madoff Securities International Ltd. (“Madoff International”) and Madoff Ltd.’: the Defendants being Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Securities LLC.

LEE S. RICHARDS III is a founding partner of Richards Knibbe & Orbe LLP. His stated specialities, according to the firm’s website, are ‘white collar criminal defense, securities enforcement defense, regulatory proceedings, internal investigations and complex litigations’.

‘He has extensive trial experience and he regularly represents investment banks, hedge funds, public companies, investment advisers, corporate officers and directors, and other professionals in investigations and proceedings by the DOJ, SEC, FINRA, and other governmental entities and SROs. He also represents companies and senior executives in commercial litigations, class action and derivative cases, and arbitrations relating to a variety of disputes’.

Under the lead-in ‘Some notable representations include’, Mr Richards’ website lists the following:

‘Representation of several major New York investment banks in a variety of DOJ, SEC and FINRA investigations…

… including the representation of one of the major investment banks which advised ENRON’.

From this information it can be stated without fear of contradiction that Mr Lee Richards III is very knowledgeable in respect of how Enron- and Madoff-type Ponzi operations are structured.

(b) Under the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (SIPA, 15 U.S.C. Sec 78aaa et seq.), the SEC and also the Securities Investor Protection Corporation requested (Civ. 08-10791) the US Court on 15th December 2008 to name Irving H. Picard [SEE BELOW] as Trustee, with the firm of Baker and Hostetler LLP appointed Counsel for the Trustee. This development will be referenced in greater detail when we examine the Court documents below, where we point out that:

Baker and Hostetler LLP has been established for 90 years with offices in Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Cosa Mesa, Denver, HOUSTON, Los Angeles, New York, Orlando, Washington DC, Brazil and Mexico. Having been ordered to be appointed Trustee under SIPA via the SEC and Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Irving J. Picard proceeded to JOIN the New York office of Baker & Hostetler LLP, per the firm’s Press Release, dated 22nd December 2008, headed: ‘Court-Appointed Trustee In Madoff Fraud Investigation Joins Baker Hostetler in New York’.

• WE REPEAT: Irving J. Picard was appointed Trustee, BAKER and Hostetler LLP were appointed Counsel to the Trustee: whereupon Irving J. Picard joins the firm of Counsel. IMAGINE!

On 3rd January 2009, The Times, London, reported that Martin Rosenman, President of Stuyvesant Fuel Service, a private New York-based fuel company, is suing Irving J. Picard, for the return of $10 million. The context of this suit revolves around that fact that Mr Picard’s first action was to obtain the Bankruptcy Court’s authority to transfer $28.1 million from the $200-$300 million said to be left in Madoff’s bank account(s), to cover the costs of the liquidation. But Mr Rosenman argued on 2nd January that Mr Picard had no right to these funds, pointing out that he (Mr Rosenman) transferred $10 million to Madoff just six days ahead of Mr Madoff’s arrest.

Specifically, Mr Rosenman argued that he spoke to Bernard L. Madoff on 3rd December 2008 about investing, and on 5th December he received details of an account into which the cash should be transferred. On 9th December, Martin Rosenman was informed by BMIS that Bernard L. Madoff had sold short $10 million in US Treasury bills on his behalf. Claiming that he had not authorised such a transfer, Mr Rosenman stated that he could find no record of any such transaction.

The lawsuit claims: ‘BMIS never transacted a trade of US Treasury bills on Rosenman’s behalf’. Mr Howard Kleinhendler, a partner in the firm of Wachtel & Masyr, representing Mr Rosenman, said that he suspected that at the time that Mr Rosenman invested his funds, Madoff knew that he was close to being exposed and caught, and was collecting cash in order to make a final distribution among family and friends. in addition to revealing Mr Picard’s action, this is just an example of the incredible legal tangle that is now building.

• 6th January 2009 Update: Irving J. Picard was reported by Bloomberg on 5th January to have identified $830 million in liquid assets in bank accounts associated with BMIS. Stephen Harbeck told the Congressional Committee that these assets ‘may be’ subject to recovery for clients of Madoff’s firm, according to Bloomberg, without explaining the use here of imprecise language.

In a separate Bloomberg report, the Assistant US Attorney, Marc Litt, whose signature appears on the Court documents obtained by the Editor of this service, was stated to have asked the Federal Judge to imprison Mr Madoff, as he awaits trial, arguing that Mr Madoff’s $10 million bail (and, one would presume, his properties pledged to the US Government) should now be revoked and the funds forfeited because he transferred $1.0 million of valuables, in violation of the asset freeze order. The report stated that Madoff disposed of five items, including ‘very valuable jewelry’, Mr Litt informed the Magistrate Judge, Ronald Ellis, on 5th January in the Manhattan Federal Court.

Some of the items were mailed by Madoff and his wife Ruth to third parties. Mr Litt stated that the transfer started on 29th December 2008, representing a ‘changed circumstance’, specified under Federal law, precipitating the necessity to alter the terms of Mr Madoff’s bail, since the transfer violated the freezing of his assets agreed to as confirmed in the Court papers we have examined.

Marc Litt explained that ‘the case against the defendant is strong, and it’s getting stronger’. The transfer represented ‘an obstruction of justice’.

(3) An examination by the Editor of the time-sequence of events which led to Bernard L. Madoff’s arrest reveals an extremely tight timeframe within which the ‘Madoff takedown operation’ was accomplished, suggesting at the very least that Attorneys, typists and other personnel would have to have worked all night on the necessary documentation.

Now knowledgeable US sources inform the Editor that this is not unusual. Nevertheless, the whole process looks TOO PAT TO HAVE BEEN SPONTANEOUS. Consider the following sequence, extracted from the Securities Fraud Count document submitted to the Court on 11th December by the FBI Special Agent, Thodore Cacioppi:

• First week of December 2008: Bernard L. Madoff informed ‘Senior Employee No. 2’ (one of his sons) that there had been requests from clients for approximately $7 billion in redemptions.

• About 9th December 2007: Madoff informed ‘Senior Employee No.1’ (one of his sons) that he wanted to pay bonuses to employees in December, rather than February (as was usual).

• On 10th December 2008, the ‘Senior Employees’ ‘visited Madoff at the offices of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC to discuss the situation further… At that time, Madoff informed the Senior Employees that he had recently made profits through business operations, and that now was a good time to distribute…’.

‘When the Senior Employees challenged his explanation, Mr Madoff said that he did not want to talk to them at the office, and arranged a meeting at Mr Madoff’s apartment in Manhattan. According to Senior Employee No. 2, Madoff stated in substance, that ‘”he wasn’t sure he would be able to hold it together” if they continued to discuss the matter at the office’.

• ‘Confession’ of Madoff to his two sons on 10th December: ‘His investment advisory business was a fraud… he was “finished”… it was “basically a giant Ponzi scheme”… the business was insolvent, and [that] it had been for years… the losses from this fraud [were] at least $50 billion’

• On 11th December, the FBI Special Agent with another FBI agent entered Madoff’s Manhattan apartment after presenting themselves, and at Madoff’s invitation. ‘He acknowledged knowing why we were there. After I [the FBI Special Agent] stated “we’re here to find out if there’s an innocent explanation”, Madoff stated, “There is no innocent explanation”‘.

The FBI Special Agent’s Charge document was dated the same day, 11th December 2008, and was signed off by The Hon. Douglas F. Eaton, United States Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of New York. Now the Editor is prepared to acknowledge that the US ‘system’ is capable of great efficiency: but given the complexity of the documents that the Editor was able to obtain direct from the Court during his pre-Christmas visit to New York, and even conceding that the documents may in some instances have been elaborated from boiler-plate templates, the whole process seems to the Editor of this service to have been MUCH TOO PAT AND COMPACT TO BE REASSURING.

That, in turn, supports the analysis that the ‘Madoff takedown’ falls into the BCCI, Enron, Iceland imposion category, the model procedure being that when the time comes for all the accessible cash to be raked out, the carcase of the target is DELIBERATELY COLLAPSED, to facilitate this.

• Depending on the circumstances, this may have to be done in a frightful hurry.

In this connection, we can also observe that Madoff told his sons that he had just $200-$300 million of cash left. THE REST OF THE FUNDS HAD BEEN MISAPPROPRIATED AND STOLEN. Hence he left the ‘collapsing operation’ until the remaining several hundred million was ‘available’ for the illegal distribution that he was contemplating: a step too far for his sons, who, if they had agreed to such a distribution, would have laid themselves open to immediate arrest, along with their father. Whether they will be arrested later, remains to be seen, and depends on how much they knew.

Finally, the relevance of the foregoing open information concerning the SEC-appointed Trustee and the SIPC-appointed Trustee who immediately joins the firm of Counsel, should be reviewed.

MADOFF ‘CHANGES THE SUBJECT’, WHILE LAW ENFORCEMENT SITS ON ITS HANDS
In summary, Madoff ‘changes the subject’: No-one is supposed to be looking inside Citibank, no-one is supposed to be going on about the Settlements, no-one is supposed to be talking about the stolen/diverted $14.0 trillion of LOAN MONEY THAT BELONGS TO THE QUEEN, TO PRINCE AL-AWEED AND THE CHINESE PARTIES, no-one is supposed to care a hoot about the plight of the 320,000 long-suffering pillaged ‘package’ victims, and no-one is supposed to be in charge of his or her brains any longer, because ‘IT ALL DEPENDS ON THE OUTCOME OF MADOFF’.

• A lovely, open-ended laywer-enriching spaghetti junction of intertwined litigation operating at cross-purposes with no conceivable resolution because the innumerable decisions will all come to rely on each other, or will be impeded by the innumerable ongoing investigations which will take years to resolve, if any can ever be resolved. The perfect contrived cover for the giga-crooks.

MEANWHILE:

• THE GIGA-CRIMINALS HAVE STOLEN THE BIG MONEY. BUSH SR. HAS PROBABLY BY NOW GOT HIS TRILLIONS ‘BACK’, even though they were of course STOLEN IN THE FIRST PLACE.

• You are perfectly entitled to ask yet again, but with much greater determination than ever:

EXACTLY WHAT HAS U.S. LAW ENFORCEMENT BEEN DOING ALL THIS TIME, WHILE WE AND OTHERS, AT GREAT RISK TO OUR OWN PERSONAL SAFETY, HAVE BEEN EXPOSING THIS BOTTOMLESS AND REEKING CESSPIT OF OPEN-ENDED U.S.-PRIMED FINANCIAL CRIMINALITY?

• Law enforcement, Gold Badges and others need to get off their butts, instead of feathering their own nests like the rest of these people, and MI6/Interpol need to redouble their own operations in order to ensure that the requirements of the owners of the LOAN funds are fulfilled. Further failure to deliver, will CERTAINLY condemn the world to an absolutely horrendous future: IN 2009.

• Our forecasts have been accurate to date: SO START PAYING PROPER ATTENTION and earn some respect, instead of displaying your individual and collective feebleness and impotence.

• It is INSUFFERABLE for you people to be allowing these criminal operatives to get away with their crimes, if this is what is happening, and to obfuscate the audit trails with the connivance of deeply-placed Accessories to the Fact of this massive operation to hijack the whole world.

• Nor can it be tolerated that the criminalist cadres may indeed be relying upon the potential for the Madoff events to OBFUSCATE matters to their advantage, and to impede the Settlements and the grossly overdue implementation of the G-7-Approved on-the-books Capital Markets revenue-producing and tax-generating SOLUTION TO THE WHOLE WORLD’S FINANCIAL PROBLEMS which the US-based Washington area operatives have deliberately and malevolently SABOTAGED.

• So get off your butts and belatedly start DOING YOUR JOB.

• Or, as we asked earlier, are you ALL co-conspirators? THAT’S THE IMPRESSION YOU GIVE.

• WE ALL WANT RESULTS, NOT LIES, BLUFFS, DIVERSIONS AND SUBTERFUGES.

THE PRIMARY ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS FROM THE MADOFF COURT FILES
Addressing exclusively the money ‘IN’ dimension, the Editor has obtained the complete file (Case Numbers: 08 MAG 2735, AND 08 Civ. 10791), as of 21st December, held at the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on the Madoff case (4), which represents the biggest explosion since our exposure of the Morgan Stanley Terrorism Financing Center, from which we report as follows, bearing in mind the context outlined above:

• Madoff’s ‘agreed bail package’ specified on the Appearance Bond dated 11th December 2008 bound Madoff to pay the United States $10.0 million (personal recognizance bond) secured by the Defendant’s Manhattan Apartment (valued at approximately $7.0 million) and to be co-signed by four financially responsible persons including his wife; and limited his travel to the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York and Connecticut, requiring him to surrender his travel documents. The Appearance Bond was signed by Bernard L. Madoff and by his wife, Ruth Madoff, and Peter Madoff, as surety.

• On 17th December 2008 a Court Agreement to Forfeit Property was signed by Bernard Madoff and Ruth Madoff. The property forfeited pending the outcome of the case consists of the Manhattan apartment on 64th Street,, Madoff’s Palm Beach residence, and his third US residence in Montauk, on the northeast fork of Long Island.

• The Complaint filed on 11th December 2008 by FBI Special Agent Theodore Cacioppi, in which Bernard L. Madoff is accused of violation of 15 U.S.C. sections 78j(b), 78ff; 17 C.F.R. section 240, 10b-5, contains inter alia the following:

COUNT ONE [Securities fraud]
1. … Bernard L. MADOFF, the defendant, unlawfully, willfully and knowingly, by the use of the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce and of the mails, directly and indirectly, in connection with the purchase and sale of securities, would and did use and employ [sundry] manipulative and deceptive devices and contrivances in violation of Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 240.10b-5, by:

(a) employing devices, schemes, and artifices to defraud;

(b) making [many] untrue statements of material facts and omitting to state material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, and:

(c) engaging in acts, practices, and courses of business which operated and would operate as a fraud and deceit upon persons, to wit, MADOFF deceived investors by operating a securities business in which he traded and lost investor money, and then paid certain investors purported returns on investment with the principal received from other, different investors, which resulted in losses of approximately billions of dollars. (…)

3. I have reviewed the publicly available website of a securities broker dealer named Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, from which I have learned the following:

(a) BERNARD L. MADOFF, defendant, is founder of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC;

(b) Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC is a securities broker dealer with its principal office in New York, New York;

(c) Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC “is a leading international market maker. The firm has been providing quality executions for broker-dealers, banks and financial institutions since its inception in 1960”;

(d) “[w]ith more than $700 million in firm capital, Madoff currently ranks among the top 1% of US Securities firms;

(e) BERNARD L. MADOFF, the defendant, is a former Chairman of the Board of Directors of the NASDAQ stock market; and:

(f) “Clients know that Bernard Madoff has a personal interest in maintaining an unblemished record of value, fair-dealing, and high ethical standards that has always been the firm’s hallmark”.

4. I have interviewed two senior employees of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“Senior Employee No. 1”, and “Senior Employee No. 2”, collectively the “Senior Employees”).

The Senior Employees informed me, in substance, of the following:

(a). The Senior Employees are employed by Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, in a proprietary trading and market making capacity. According to the Senior Employees, BERNARD L. MADOFF, the defendant, conducts certain investment advisory business for clients that is separate from the firm’s proprietary trading and market making activities.

According to the Senior Employees, MADOFF ran his investment adviser business from a separate floor in the New York offices of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. According to Senior Employee No. 1, MADOFF kept the financial statements for the firm under lock and key, and stated that MADOFF was “cryptic” about the firm’s investment advisory business.

(b). In or about the first week of December 2008, BERNARD L. MADOFF, the defendant, told Senior Employee No. 2 that there had been requests from [various] clients for approximately $7.0 billion in redemptions, that he was struggling to obtain the liquidity necessary to meet these obligations, but that he thought that he would be able to do so.

According to the Senior Employees, they had previously understood that the investment advisory business had assets under management on the order of between approximately $8 and $15 billion. According to a Form ADV filled by MADOFF on behalf of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC with the SEC on or about January 7, 2008, MADOFF’s investment advisory business served between 11 and 25 clients and had a total of about $17.1 billion in assets under management.

(c). On or about December 9, 2008, MADOFF informed Senior Employee No. 1 that he wanted to pay bonuses to employees of the firm in December, which was earlier than the employee bonuses are usually paid. According to the Senior Employees, bonuses traditionally have been paid in February of each year. On or about December 10, 2008, the Senior Employees visited MADOFF at the offices of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC so as to discuss the situation further, particularly because MADOFF had appeared to the Senior Employees to have been under great stress in the prior weeks. At that time, Mr MADOFF informed the Senior Employees that he had recently made profits through business operations, and that now was a good time to distribute them. When the Senior Employees challenged his explanation, MADOFF said he did not want to talk to them at the office, and arranged a meeting at MADOFF’s apartment in Manhattan.

According to Senior Employee No. 2, MADOFF stated, in substance, that he “wasn’t sure he would be able to hold it together” if they continued to discuss the issue at the office.

(d). At MADOFF’s Manhattan apartment, MADOFF informed the Senior Employees, in substance, that his investment advisory business was a fraud. MADOFF stated that he was “finished”, that he [now] had “absolutely nothing”, that “it’s all just one big lie”, and that it was “basically a Ponzi scheme”. The Senior Employees understood MADOFF to be saying, in substance, that he had for years been paying returns to certain investors out of the principal received from other, different investors. MADOFF stated that the business was insolvent, and that it had been for years. Mr MADOFF also stated that he estimated the losses from this fraud to be at least approximately $50 billion. One of the Senior Employees has a personal account at Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC in which several million had been invested under the management of MADOFF.

(e). At MADOFF’s Manhattan apartment, MADOFF further informed the Senior Employees that, in approximately one week, he planned to surrender to authorities, but before he did that, he had approximately $200-$300 million left, and he planned to use that money to make payments to certain selected employees, family, and friends. (…)

5. On December 11, 2008, I spoke to BERNARD L. MADOFF, the defendant. After identifying myself, MADOFF invited me, and the FBI agent who accompanied me, into his apartment. He acknowledged knowing why we were there.

After I stated, “we’re here to find out if there’s an innocent explanation”, MADOFF stated, “There is no innocent explanation”. MADOFF stated, in substance, that he had personally traded and had lost money for institutional clients, and that it was all his fault. MADOFF further stated, in substance, that he “paid investors with money that wasn’t there”.

MADOFF stated that he was “broke” and “insolvent” and that he had decided that “it could not go on”, and that he expected to go to jail. MADOFF also stated that he had recently admitted what he had done to Senior Employees Nos. 1, 2 and 3.

WHEREFORE, deponent prays that BERNARD L. MADOFF, the defendant, be imprisoned, or bailed, as the case may be.

THEODORE CACIOPPI
Special Agent
Federal Bureau of Investigation

Sworn to before me this 11th day of December, 2008

[Signed] Honorable Douglas F. Eaton, United States Magistrate Judge,
Southern District of New York.

THE COMPLAINT BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Complaint, filed with the Court on 11th December 2008 (08 Civ. 10791) informed the Court in summary that:

1. The Commission brings this emergency action to halt ongoing fraudulent offerings of securities and investment advisory fraud by Bernard L. Madoff (“Madoff”) and Bernard L. Madoff Investment securities LLC (“BMIS”), a broker dealer and investment adviser registered with the Commission. From an indeterminate period through the present, Madoff and BMIS has committed fraud through the investment adviser activities of BMIS. Yesterday, Madoff admitted to one or more employees of BMIS that for many years he has been conducting a Ponzi-scheme through the investment adviser activities of BMIS and that BMIS has liabilities of approximately $50 billion.

Mr Madoff told these employees that he intends to distribute any remaining funds at BMIS to the employees and certain investors in the investment advisor business, such as family and friends. Such a distribution will be unfair and inequitable to other investors and creditors of BMIS.

2. Expedited relief is needed to halt the fraud and prevent the Defendants from unfairly distributing the remaining assets in an unfair and inequitable manner to employees, friends and relatives, at the expense of other customers.

3. To halt the ongoing fraud, maintain the status quo and preserve any assets for injured investors, the Commission seeks emergency relief, including temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions, and an order:

(i) imposing asset freezes against the Defendants;

(ii) appointing a receiver over BMIS;

(iii) allowing expedited discovery and preventing the destruction of documents; and:

(iv) requiring the Defendants to provide verified accountings.

The Commission also seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, plus prejudgment interest and civil monetary penalties against all of the Defendants.

On 12th December 2008, the SEC asked the Court to issue ‘a temporary restraining Order and an Order freezing assets and granting other relief’ (08 Civ. 10791 (LLS) ECF Case: to which, in a Note, the SEC stated that the Defendants had consented) directing that:

‘pending a final disposition of this action, Defendants, and each of their financial and brokerage institutions, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and those persons in active concert or in participation with either of them who receive actual notice of such Order by means of personal service, facsimile service, telephonic notice, notice by e-mail, or otherwise, and each of them, hold and retain within their control, and otherwise prevent, any withdrawal, transfer, pledge, [offsetting or] encumbrance, assignment, dissipation, concealment or other disposal of any assets, funds, or other property (including money, real or personal property, securities, commodities, choses [sic] in action or other property of any kind whatsoever) of, held by, or under the direct or indirect control of, Defendants, whether held in the name of Madoff, BMIS, Madoff International or Madoff Ltd.., or for the direct or indirect beneficial interest of one or both of them, wherever situated, in whatever form such assets may presently exist and wherever located, and directing each of the financial or brokerage institutions, debtors and bailees, or any other person or entity holding such assets, funds or other property of the Defendants, to hold or retain within its control and prohibit the withdrawal, removal, transfer or other disposal of any such assets, funds or other properties, including, but not limited to:

(1) all assets, funds, or other properties held in the name of, held by, or under the control of one or both of the Defendants;

(2) all accounts in the name of Madoff or BMIS or on which Madoff is a signatory, including the accounts listed [herewith: the accounts were listed as Appendix A but are given here now]:

• JP Morgan Chase Account No: 000000140081703
Account in the Name of: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities

• JP Morgan Chase Account No: 000000066709466
Account in the Name of: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities

• The Bank of New York Mellon Account No: 890-0402-393
Account in the Name of: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities

• The Bank of New York Mellon Account No: 030-0951050
Account in the Name of: Bernard L. Madoff

• The Bank of New York Mellon Account No: 866-1126-621
Account in the Name of: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC

• NOTE: On 30th December, it emerged that Irving J. Picard, the SIPC-appointed Trustee, had reached ‘an understanding’ with Bank of New York Mellon to have certain funds released.

MORE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON BANK ACCOUNTS COME TO LIGHT
But the US Bankruptcy Judge, Burton Lifland, indicated that the Court papers outlining the said ‘agreement’ were ‘very basic’, according to Bloomberg, and asked Picard’s lawyer, Richard Bernard, for more information on the accounts in question. Bernard told the Court that there are ‘more funds and accounts’, without being specific.

He added that Bank of New York Mellon was holding some funds back because it may have “set-off rights” on certain claims, adding that he was limited in what he could say in open Court because of the ongoing criminal investigations. Clause III of the Order requested of the Court by the SEC and SIPC against BMIS filed on 15th December 2008 and signed by US District Judge Louis L. Stanton at 4:08pm on that date, reads:

‘ORDERED that all persons and entities are notified that, subject to the other provisions of 11 U.S.C. section 362, the automatic stay provisions of 11 U.S.C. section 362(a) operate as a stay of:

… G. The set-off of any debt owing to the Defendant that arose before the commencement of this proceeding against any claim against the Defendant’.

Clause VIII elaborates: ‘ORDERED that the stays set forth above shall not apply to:

G. Any set-off or liquidating transaction undertaken pursuant to the rules or bylaws of any securities clearing agency registered under section 17A(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. section 78q-1(b), or by any person acting under instructions from and on behalf of such a securities clearing agency…’.

To illustrate again that the SEC has finally been galvanised in this case to be seen to be casting its net over EVERY PARTY involved with Mr Madoff, Paragraph III of the SEC’s Order to Show Cause, Temporary Restraining Order, and Order Freezing Assets and Granting Other Relief [dated 12th December 2008] stated [page 8 of the Court document]:

‘IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants show cause… why this Court should not also enter an Order enjoining them, and any person or entity acting at their direction or on their behalf, from destroying, altering, concealing or otherwise interfering with, the access of the [SEC] Plaintiff Commission to any and all documents, books and records, that are in the possession, custody or control of Defendants, and each of their partners, agents, employees, servants, accountants, financial or brokerage institutions, attorneys-in-fact, subsidiaries, affiliates, predecessors and successors and related entities that refer, reflect or relate to the allegations in the Complaint, including, without limitation, documents, books, and records referring, reflecting or relating to defendants’ finances or business operations, or the offer or sale of securities by Defendants and the use of proceeds therefrom’. ENDS.

The relevant Court-filed documents clearly and specifically identify all the possible categories of collaborators and participants, and all Madoff-related property wherever located, prohibiting the tampering with and destruction of documents and of course TEAR SHEETS, or any movement of funds, requiring the unravelling of all funds commingled between BMIS and Madoff’s personal account(s), so that anyone caught up in this maelstrom who disturbs the audit trail will fall within the Court’s sights for appropriate treatment.

Specifically, the Defendants were directed to ‘provide a verified accounting immediately’, against the background of the freezing of the assets of the Defendants, the appointment of Lee Richards, of Richards Kibbe & Orbe LLP as ‘Receiver for the Defendants’ assets including without limitation Madoff Securities International Ltd (“Madoff International”)’, the London platform from where the primary leveraging operations were run, ‘and Madoff Ltd’.

The SEC’s Order requesting the freezing of relevant accounts and other relief sought, as noted, prohibition of ‘the destruction, concealment, or alteration of documents by Defendants’. ‘It appears from the evidence presented that certain ill-gotten gains derived from the Defendants’ fraudulent conduct have been deposited into the accounts of BMIS and/or Mr Madoff’s personal accounts. Self-evidently, Madoff-linked accounts in London and on the Continent are clearly targeted by the language of the Court documents, but it remains to be seen whether this will result in transparency of whether, as may be expected, an opaque veil will be drawn over the international dimensions.

On 31st December 2008, it was reported that Pomerantz, a prominent law firm, was considering asking the US District Court for the Southern District of New York to publish the list that Madoff had been required to compile, detailing the precise whereabouts of the assets. This firm was reported to be seeking to sue hedge fund Ponzi operations that channelled money into the Madoff ‘money machine’. Bernard L. Madoff had been required by the US Court to draw up a detailed list of all his investments, assets, loans, lines of credit and accounts (should there be any beyond those already identified by the SEC in its documentation), and to furnish this information by close of business on New Year’s Eve (see below).

Bloomberg reported on 1st January 2009 that an SEC enforcement official, Andrew Calamari, had confirmed receipt of the list of assets required to have been delivered by Mr Madoff and BMIS by close of business on 31st December 2008, adding that the list will not be made public. The official said that the Court had not authorised the disclosure of the ‘domestic’ list: ‘The 18th December Court Order does not authorize public release of materials related to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s ongoing investigation’.

• Commenting on this point, Professor John Coffee of Columbia Law School told Bloomberg that the SEC may intend the data to be kept secret because ‘there is a danger that foreign regulators and foreign creditors may seek to seize that money if the names are made public’.

• This was the first hint that, in addition to the US domestic legal ‘spaghetti junction’ of conflicting litigation, the international dimension will magnify this legal quagmire by an order of magnitude.

Under the relevant Court order signed by Louis L. Stanton, US District Judge, the list had to include all assets held by Madoff’s operations for his “direct or indirect benefit”.

Madoff’s foreign operations, such as the London-based Ponzi scamming machine offices located off Berkeley Square, Mayfair, central London, were given until 26th January to compile and hand over their own lists. Exclusion of any information from such lists will incur severe consequences.

By the end of 2008, four related cases by aggrieved investors had already been filed since the Madoff ‘confession’, arrest and bail arrangements were publicised. The SEC is expected to take steps to repatriate assets held outside the United States. All cases lodged into this maelstrom will become entangled in the already complex demands of the SEC/SIPC/FINRA investigations.

On 3rd January 2009, Fred Longer, a lawyer representing Group Defined Pension Plan & Trust, a Jersey City, NJ-based investor, filed a lawsuit in the Manhattan Federal Court against the hedge fund operator Tremont Group Holdings [see list below] over Madoff-related losses. Also named was Tremont’s auditor, Ernst & Young LLP, with Longer claiming that the accounting firm missed warnings about the Ponzi scheme. This Complaint seeks class-action, or group, status.

It appears that losses disclosed by some clients, and in the public demain [see our list below] may have been inflated by purported gains shown in the clients’ accounts with Madoff. Thus, whereas Yeshiva University, New York, had valued its foldings with Madoff at $110 million, it stated on 30th December that its net investment was of the order of $14.5 million, before inflation by ‘fictitious profits’. So there may be large differences between ‘money ‘IN”, and totals ‘lost’.

EXPERT ADVANCE WARNINGS ‘DISREGARDED BY THE S.E.C.’
To add to the discomfort of the SEC and the entire Bush-corrupted Wall Street Establishment, it emerged before Christmas that Harry Markopolos, a derivatives expert who previously worked for Rampart Investment Management, a fund competing with the Madoff operations, had been warning the SEC for TEN YEARS prior to the Madoff exposures, that Bernard L. Madoff’s activities ‘stank to high heaven’. He spent ten years trying to induce the Securities and Exchange Commission to investigate Mr Madoff and all his works.

For instance, Markopolos had accused Madoff of using the names of UBS and Merrill Lynch to lend credibility to his Ponzi activities. This is a variant of our point that holders of ‘derived’ assets enjoy NO RECOURSE TO SOURCE OF FUNDS, with their ‘assets’ supported solely by the name(s) of the institution(s) marketing them (their values being, as a savvy Jewish friend of the Editor’s pointed out recently, ‘what somebody agrees to pay for them’).

The London Times reported on 19th December that:

‘According to the [Markopolos] documents, which were written in November 2005, Mr Madoff is alleged to have told potential investors that all his options trading business was channelled through UBS and Merrill Lynch’.

‘However, Mr Markopolos asserted: “The counterparty credit exposures for UBS and Merrill would be too large for these firms’ credit departments to approve. The SEC should ask Bernard Madoff for trade tickets showing he has traded OTC [over the counter] options thru these two firms”‘.

‘It is understood that neither UBS nor Merrill Lynch has any material exposure to Mr Madoff’s businesses and also that neither had had a sufficiently substantial relationship with Mr Madoff to have conducted these types of trades. Such a discrepancy raises serious questions about the truthfulness of Mr Madoff’s sales pitch to new investors, such as hedge funds, and whether Mr Madoff sought to exploit the longstanding reputations of UBS and Merrill Lynch [sic] to legitimise his own operations’.

On 22nd December, The Times, London, elaborated:

‘Harry Markopolos, a derivatives expert who once worked for a rival fund, spent ten years urging the SEC to investigate Mr Madoff. In numerous reports, including a 19-page document written in November 2005 entitled ‘The World’s Largest Hedge Fund is a Fraud’, Mr Markopolos picked apart the investment strategy of Mr Madoff’.

‘Some claims by Mr Markopolos were anecdotal – “I have spoken to the heads of various Wall Street equity derivative trading desks and every single one of the senior managers I spoke with told me that Bernie Madoff was a fraud” – but sizeable chunks of his accusations involve detailed analysis of Mr Madoff’s investment strategy. He questions the way that Bernard Madoff charged for commissions and alleges that Mr Madoff used the names of leading investment banks such as UBS and Merrill Lynch to lend credibility to his schemes’.

‘He also claims that the overall investment strategy of Mr Madoff would have been impossible to carry out. Mr Madoff sought to lure investors with the promise of 12% returns by buying blue-chip stocks and insuring against the possibility that their value would fall by selling derivatives – a process known as hedging. Mr Markopolos argues, however, that for Mr Madoff to have fulfilled such a strategy, he would have regularly done more business than the entire New York market in those securities’.

HEAVILY PROMOTED STAR WITNESS FAILS TO APPEAR: WAS HE THREATENED?
Unsurprisingly, Harry Markopolos was to be a star witness to be questioned on 5th January 2009 by the Financial Services Committee of the House of Representatives, where the Democrat Chairman of the panel, Barney Frank, was faced with having to steer a careful course between seeking to extract the truth from terrified SEC officials, and the known involvement of severely compromised members of the Legislative Branch of the United States Government.

• UPDATE: Bloomberg reported on 5th January that Harry Markopolos, the former Chief Investment Officer with Tampart Investment Management, Boston, cancelled his appearance before Congress, saying that he was ‘worn down’ and wanted more time to prepare his remarks, accoding to Barney Frank, Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. This development has to be added to the roster of UNSATISFACTORY DEVELOPMENTS related elsewhere in this report. The impression gained is that Mr Markopolos may have been THREATENED and ordered to amend his testimony, ‘or else’. If such tactics are being used, it shows that the rats have STILL not realised that WHETHER THEY LIKE IT OR NOT, EVERYTHING WILL BE EXPOSED.

CALENDAR OF OFFICIAL REGULATORY AND ENFORCEMENT FAILURES
The Christian Science Monitor obliged on 5th January with a handy summary of the ongoing ‘lapses’ of supervision and enforcement by the corrupted Securities and Exchange Commission, to wit:

• 1992: Madoff’s name comes up in an SEC probe of Florida accountants who
allegedly sold unregistered securities.

• 1999: SEC examiners review trading practices at Madoff’s investment advisory firm.

• 2001: The SEC’s Boston office receives information from securities industry executive Harry Markopolos raising questions about the steady stock market returns of Madoff’s firm.

• 2004: The SEC looks into whether Madoff’s firm engaged in improper trading practices.

• 2005: The SEC interviews Madoff and family members, finding no improper trading practices.

• 2005: An industry-based regulatory office finds no improper trading practices by Madoff’s firm.

• 2005: SEC investigators meet with Markopolos, who alleges that Madoff’s firm is “the world’s largest Ponzi scheme”: see details above.

• 2006: An SEC enforcement investigation finds that Madoff and one of his clients misled regulators. As a result, Madoff agrees to register as an investment adviser.

• 2007: The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) examines Madoff’s firm. No regulatory action results. It appears that this entity took its cue from the corrupted SEC [yet see above].

PARALLEL INTERVENTION OF THE SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION
United States District Judge Louis L. Stanton signed the Defendants’ consent to the total Order (only partially reported here) at 4.51pm on 12th December 2008. Additionally, under the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (SIPA, 15 U.S.C. Sec 78aaa et seq.), the SEC and also the Securities Investor Protection Corporation requested (Civ. 08-10791) the Court on the 15th December 2008 to agree that ‘customers of the Defendant, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, are in need of the protection afforded by the’ SIPA, and in particular than the Court should order:

‘that all persons and entities are stayed, enjoined and restrained from directly or indirectly removing, transferring, setting off, receiving, retaining, changing, selling, pledging, assigning or otherwise disposing of, withdrawing or interfering with any assets or property owned, controlled or in the possession of the Defendant, including but not limited to the books and the records of the Defendant, and customers’ securities and credit balances, except for the purpose of effecting possession and control of said property by the Trustee’ (who was named as Irving H. Picard), with the firm of Baker and Hostetler LLP appointed Counsel for the Trustee.

Baker and Hostetler LLP has been established for 90 years and has offices in Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Cosa Mesa, Denver, HOUSTON, Los Angeles, New York, Orlando, Washington DC, Brazil and Mexico. Having been ordered to be appointed Trustee under SIPA via the SEC and Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Irving J. Picard proceeded to JOIN the New York office of Baker & Hostetler LLP, per the firm’s Press Release, dated 22nd December 2008 headed: ‘Court-Appointed Trustee In Madoff Fraud Investigation Joins Baker Hostetler in New York’.

Thus no sooner had the court-appointed Trustee, Irving H, Picard, been approved, than he joined the firm appointed as Counsel for the Trustee – raising the obvious question in the minds of this and other observers as to whether we have just uncovered a posible prospective inside stitch-up, the intent of which might logically be to control the exposure of information which would link the Madoff Master-Ponzi scheme and its subsidiary Ponzi operations directly with the Bush Sr.-Clinton Fraudulent Finance Crime Carousel, as has already been signalled above. It is not stated here that this IS the case: what is stated here is solely that the question has arisen.

A Memorandum of Law supporting the application of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (all related documents labelled Civ. 08-10791), filed on 15th December, stated inter alia that:

‘A proceeding under SIPA is a liquidation proceeding. The Trustee has the same powers and title with respect to the broker-dealer and its property as a Trustee in bankruptcy, including the right to avoid preferences. SIPA does not attempt to make all customers whole [see above] and SIPC is not an insurer of customer accounts. SIPA establishes a plan of limited protection via the liquidation proceeding, in which SIPC’s role is carefully delineated’.

‘It contemplates that customers’ claims will be satisfied to the maximum extent possible from the assets already on hand with the member… SIPA was not intended for the protection of brokers and dealers. However, after a liquidation proceeding is commenced to protect a member’s customers, SIPA authorizes the Trustee to close out certain contractual commitments between the members and another broker-dealer. This authority was designed to avoid the so-called “domino effect”, namely, the chance that the demise of a member might precipitate the failure of one or more other broker-dealers’.

‘Under SIPA Sec 78eee(b)(1), the Court is required to issue a protective decree if the Court finds that any of the conditions specified in the legislation exists, each of which is ‘a clear manifestation of serious difficulties that create, at the very least, an unacceptably high risk of loss of customer property for which the Defendant is responsible and accountable’.

The application by SIPC concluded:

‘According to information provided by the Commission and FINRA [the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority], the Defendant is insolvent, is unable to meet its obligations as they mature, and is not in compliance with the requirements regarding financial responsibility under sections 15(c)(3) and 17(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. sections 78o(c)(3) and 78q(a) (2000), and [also] Commission Rules 15c3-1, 15C3-3 and 17a-3, 17 C.F.R. sections 240.15c3-1, section 240.15c3-3 and section 240.17a-3. Consequently, three of the conditions referred to in SIPA section 78eee(a)(3) and specified in SIPA section 78eee(b)(1) exist’.

‘Pursuant to SIPA section78eee(b)(1), if the defendant consents to the issuance of a protective decree, the Court “shall forthwith issue a protective decree”’.

On the same day, 15th December 2008, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC consented to the issuance of a protective decree by the Court, although whether this will in practice adequately serve the interests of the investors in the giga-Ponzi scheme, who were in many cases themselves operating subsidiary Ponzi schemes, remains to be seen. The obvious question in the mind of this investigator and others is: with the Court-appointed Trustee having joined the Court-appointed firm of Counsel, are we looking at a pre-prepared damage limitation operation carefully designed not to expose the corruption and to procure statutory remedies, but rather to cover up linkages which would provide further direct connections with the Bush-Clinton Fraudulent Finance Money Factory operations that have already been partially exposed by this service?

IF YOU THINK YOU’RE A VICTIM, THE FBI WOULD LIKE TO HEAR FROM YOU
On 18th December 2008, the FBI issued the following Press Release:

U.S. Department of Justice
Federal Bureau of Investigation

PRESS RELEASE
26 Federal Plaza
New York
NY 10278

For Immediate Release

December 18, 2008

U.S. v. Bernard L. Madoff
http://newyork.fbi.gov/pressrel/2008/nyfo121808.htm

If you believe that you have been a financial fraud victim in the above captioned matter, please provide the following information:

(1) Full name
(2) Mailing address
(3) Phone number
(4) COPIES of any documents that substantiate your loss (do not send original documents)

Please mail this information to:

FBI New York
ATTN: Victim Assistance Office
26 Federal Plaza
23rd Floor
New York, NY 10278

Madoff’s offices on Madison Avenue have been guarded 24 hours a day, partly to prevent attacks by irate scammed investors, with the office sealed since Bernard L. Madoff was arrested, while FBI, Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities Investor Protection Corporation and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority investigators conduct urgent forensic examinations of Mr Madoff’s multiple sets of books.

Because no information is yet available on the value of the leveraged and hypothecated ‘money OUT’ numbers, the focus, as noted above, has so far been (and may remain) on the ‘money IN’ losses attributed (as at the end of 2008) to investors and operators of sub-Ponzi schemes in the Madoff giga-Ponzi operation. Here is an interim list, based upon open data available at the end of 2008, of the affected parties, whose funds have been STOLEN, not lost:

INTERIM LIST OF ‘MONEY IN’ LOSERS ARISING FROM THE DELIBERATE COLLAPSING
OF THE MADOFF COMPONENT OF THE GLOBAL PONZI MONEY MACHINE*

*Note: Data extracted from open sources. Some data varies between source.

Abu Dhabi Investment Authority [at least $400 million]
Access International Advisors, René-Thierry Magon de La Villehuchet [$1,400 million]
Aozora Bank (Japanese bank) [$230 million]
Ascot Fund [Gabriel Capital, Ascot Partners] [$0.92 billion]
Ascot Partners [Gabriel Capital], hedge fund founded by L Ezra Merkin [$1,800 million]
AXA (French insurer) [$123 million]
Banco Santander, Optimal Investment Services, Geneva [$2,870 million-$3,100 million]
Bank Medici (Austrian Bank, believed bankrupted) [$2,100 million]
Banque Bénédict Hentsch & Cie [$47.5 million -$48.8 million]
BBVA (Spanish bank) [$369 million -$404 million]
Benbassat & Cie [$935 million]
BNP Paribas SA [initially $431-$478 million, later ‘billions of Euros of losses’]
Braman, Norman, former owner of the Philadelphia Eagles [$ unknown]
Bramdean Alternatives (Mrs Nicola Horlick) [9.5% of assets]
Caissse de Dépots et Consignations [$1.4 million]
Carl and Ruth Shapiro Family Foundation [see Carl Shapiro]
Carl Shapiro, former Chairman of Kay Windsor, Inc, apparel) [$545 million]
Chais Family Foundation [$ unknown]
Clal Insurance $0.8 million]
CNP Assurances [$4.1 million]
Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun [$3.5 million]
Crédit Mutuel [$124 million]
Dexia Bank [$107 million]
EIM Group (European investment firm) [$230 million]
Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity [$15.2 million: 100% loss]
Eric Roth, film writer [$ unknown]
Fairfield Greenwich Advisors & Group, Walter Noel [$7,500 million]
Fairfield Sentry/Sigma Fund [see Fairfield] [$7.28 billion]
Fairfield, CT (town pension fund for public employees) [$42 million]
Feinstein, Leonard, co-founder of Bed Bath & Beyond [$ unknown]
Fix Asset Management [$400 million]
Fortis Bank, Nederland (Dutch bank) [$1,350 million-$1,400 million]
Gerald Breslauer, Los Angeles financial adviser [$ unknown]
Gift of Life Bone Marrow Foundation [$1.8 million]
Great Eastern Holdings, Singapore [$64 million]
Groupama [$13.6 million]
Harel Insurance [$14.2 million]
Harley International Ltd [Cayman: all its assets: $2.76 billion managed as at end-October 2008]
Henry Kaufman, economist [$ unknown]
Herald USA [see Bank Medici] [$2.50 billion]
HSBC Holdings [$1,000 million]
Hyopswiss (Swiss private bank) [$50 million]
Jeffrey Katzenberg [$ unknown]
JEHT Foundation [$ unknown]
Jewish Federation of Greater Washington [$10 million]
Jewish Foundation of Greater Los Angeles [$6.4 million]
Julian J. Levitt Foundation [$6.0 million]
Kevin Bacon, actor [$ unknown]
Kingate Global Management [FIM Advisors] [$2.75 billion – $3,500 million]
Korea Life Insurance [$50 million]
Lautenberg, Senator Frank and family foundation [$ unknown]
Liliane Bettencourt, L’Oréal SA heiress [$ billions unknown]
LuxALPHA SICAV – American Selection [Ascot International Advisors] [$1.4 billion]
M & B Capital Advisers (Spanish bank) [$52.8 million]
Madoff Family Foundation [$19 million]
Maimonides School [Up to $5 million]
Man Group (British hedge fund) [$360 million]
Maxam Capital Management (CT-based fund of funds) [$280 million]
Mediobanca [$0.7 million]
Merkin, Ezra, Chairman of GMAC Corporation: see Ascot Partners
Mirabaud [$ several million]
Mortimer B. Zuckerman Charitable Remainder Trust [$30 million]
Natixis (French investment bank) [$554 million]
Neue Privat Bank [$5.0 million]
New York Law School through Ascot Partners [At least $3 million]
Nomura Holdings [$304 million]
Nordea Bank (Swedish bank) [$59 million]
North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health Care System [$5.7 million
Notz Stucki [$ unknown]
Optimal Strategic US Equity [see Santander] [$3.23 billion]
Picower Foundation [$958 million: has announced closure]
Pioneer Alternative Investments [$280 million]
Primeo Select Fund US [UniCredit. Pioneer Alt Invs] [$0.85 billion]
Ramaz School [$6.0 million]
Reichmuth, (Swiss private bank) The Reichmuth Matterhorn Fund [$327 million]
Robert J. Lappin Charitable Foundation [$8 million: 100% loss]
Royal Bank of Scotland [$599 million-$625 million]
Rye Select broad market Fund [see Tremont] $3.10 billion]
SAR Academy [$1.2 million]
Senator Frank R. Lautenberg’s Charitable Foundation [$ unknown]
Société Générale [$13.8 million]
Stephen Spielberg [$ unknown]
Sterling Equities [[$ unknown]
Swiss Life Holding (Swiss insurer) [$78.9 million]
Thema International Fund [see Bank Medici] [$1.10 billion]
Tremont Group Holdings, hedge fund of Massachusetts Mutual Life [$3,300 million]
Tufts University [$20 million]
UBI Banca (Italian bank) [$86 million]
UBS AG [$ unknown]
UniCredit (Italian bank) [$92 million]
Union Bancaire Privée (Swiss bank) [$700 million -$1,080 million]
Vincent Tchenguiz, UK property magnate, via Bramdean [£40 million]
Wilpon, Fred, owner of the New York Mets [$ unknown]
Wunderkinder Foundation, Steven Spielberg [$ unknown, heavy Madoff investor]
Yeshiva University, New York [$110-$125 million: but see text above]
Zuckerman, Morton, Chairman of Boston Properties, landlords of the Citibank offices at 399 Park Avenue and owner of The New York Daily News and U.S. News and World Report [significant losses through a fund that invested substantially all of its assets with Madoff’]

FORMER PRESIDENT CLINTON FORCED TO REVEAL HIS ‘DONORS’
Finally, in a further indication that the skids are well and truly under the highest-level financial fraudsters, we must add that former President Clinton released what The New York Times called ‘a complete list’ of more than 200,000 ‘donors’ [sic] to the William J. Clinton Foundation ‘as part of an agreement to douse concerns about potential conflicts of interest if Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is confirmed as the Secretary of State in the Obama Administration’. The list revealed that ‘some of the world’s richest people and most famous celebrities handed over large checks to finance his Presidential Library and charitable [sic] activities’.

The New York Times’ articles [19th and 20th December 2008] did not, however, mention that the Clinton Library is equipped with some of the most sophisticated state-of-the-art eavesdropping and electronic equipment in the world, and that the new list of donors and donations (of which a small selection is appended below) is indicative of a ‘you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours’ approach, also known in the United States as ‘pay to play’.

• The disclosure of these names represents a component of a deal intended to smooth the way for Mrs Clinton to be confirmed and to move seamlessly into the State Department. On 4th January, the facile British Press was praising Mrs Clinton as ‘an honest broker’. Manifestly, Fleet Street uses a dictionary not available to the rest of us. It would be helpful if the stupid UK journalists concerned would belatedly look up the word ‘honest’ in the Oxford English Dictionary.

Funds for the Katrina disaster were channelled corruptly into a joint ‘foundation’ controlled by George H. W. Bush Sr. and former President Clinton, under the ‘nose’ of the complicit or feeble Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA, originally funded with ‘Black Ops’ drug money).

The fate of the Katrina money has subsequently been ‘successfully’ obfuscated by the highest-level current and former office-holding criminal financiers, so that it is currently not possible to identify Katrina funds having been moved into the William J. Clinton Foundation: but logic would suggest that this would have occurred, and/or that the funds were used to finance illicit below-the-radar financial leveraging transactions, in the usual manner.

The ‘deal’, brokered by the Obama team represented by its co-chairwoman Valerie Jarrett, reflects a 5-page Memorandum of Understanding signed on 12th December 2008 with the William J. Clinton Foundation, represented by its Chief Executive, Bruce R. Lindsey. This Memorandum required Mr Clinton to disclose his past donors by the end of 2008 and any future contributors once a year.

It also required that that ‘if’ Mrs Clinton is confirmed, the Clinton Global Initiative, an offshoot of the Foundation, will be incorporated separately, will no longer hold events outside the United States and will refuse any further contributions from foreign governments.

More vaguely, other initiatives operating under the auspices of the Foundation would follow new rules and consult with US State Department ethics officials in certain circumstances. (There is of course no reference in the document to any requirement that the ‘ethics officials’ have oversight over the intended illicit financial activities of the criminal operative Hillary Clinton in the event that, as intended, this Jezebel winds up as Secretary of State).

Previously, Mr Clinton had declined to reveal the identities of donors to his Foundation, as Federal law does not require former US Presidents to reveal foundation donors. Clinton’s main argument had been that many donors expected confidentiality.

Yet, all of a sudden, this ‘concern’ was jettisoned, in the scramble to ensure that Mrs Clinton arrives at the State Department without being cuffed and jailed or bailed on the way.

To mask this U-turn, Clinton advocates waffled following the disclosures that the list showed that Mr Clinton had nothing to hide, which is NOT the point that Clinton relied upon earlier when he declined to publish the list in order to preserve the confidentiality of the donors. Many of these parties will certainly have been chagrined at the emergence of their identifies as Clinton donors, into the public domain – not least because as this concatenation of immense financial scandals progressively expands like a solar explosion, they risk their names being dragged into the sewer along with those of the Clinton criminals themselves.

PARTIAL LIST OF CLINTON FOUNDATION ‘DONORS’
The following partial list of prominent ‘donors’ to the William J Clinton Foundation has been assembled to illustrate the ‘pay-to-play’ dimension of the way these crooks operate, lifting the veil on how these organised US gangsters have spread their filthy corruption throughout the world:

• Selected prominent donors to the William J. Clinton Foundation out of a total of 200,000 donors named by former President Clinton on 18th December 2008 in the interests of ‘transparency’ but contrary to the interests of the donors and as part of the deal to infiltrate Mrs Clinton into the State Department, where she will be ‘protected’ and from where the intention is that the fraudulent finance operations will continue:

Absolute Return for Kids [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Abu Dhabi Ruling Family [$ not known by this service]
Alfonso Fanjul [$ not known by this service]
Alix Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Amar Singh [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Arnold H. Simon [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Ausaid [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Australian Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Barbra Streisand/Streisand Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Bernard L Schwartz [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Blackwater Training Center [$ not known by this service]
Blackwater Training Center [$ not known by this service]
Bloomberg L.P. [$ not known by this service]
Bren and Melvin Simon [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Brunei Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Cameron Diaz, actress [Between $25,001 and $50,000]
Children’s Investment Fund Foundation, [More than $25 million]
Citi Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative, Canada [$1,000,001 to $5.0 million]
Copresida-Secretariado Tecnico [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Denise Rich [Brand], former wife of Marc Rich [Hans Brand] [$250,001 to $500,000]
Dominican Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Dubai Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Eli and Edythe Broade Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
ELMA Foundation [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Elton John AIDS Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Entergy Corporation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Frank Giustra, CEO, Radcliffe Foundation [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Fred Eychaner [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Freddie Mac [$ not known by this service]
Friends of Saudi Arabia [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Gilbert R. Chagoury [Nigerian President Abacha crony] [$1,000,00 to $5.0 million]
Government of Brunei Darussalam [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Government of Norway [Between $5,000,001 and $10 million]
Haim Saban and Saban Family Foundation [Between $5,000,001 and $10 million]
Howard and Michele Kessler [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Howard Gilman Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Hunter Foundation [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Issam M. Fares & Wedge Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
James P. Greenbaum Jr. Family Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
John D. Mackay [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Kuwait Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Lakshmi N. Mittal [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Lukas H. Lundin [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
MAC AIDS Fund [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Mala Gaonkar Haarmann [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Michael and Jena King [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Michael Schumacher [Between $5,000,001 and $10 million]
Michael Smurfit [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Harold Snyder [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Nasser al-Rashid [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Nationale Postcode Loterij [Between $5,000,001 and $10 million]
Norwegian Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Omani Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Open Society Institute (George Soros) [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Paul Reynolds [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Presidential Inaugural Committee [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Princess Diana Memorial Fund [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Qatari Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Richard Caring [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Robert L. Johnson [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Robertson Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Rockefeller Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable and Educational Trust [$1,000,001 to $5.0 million]
Rupert Murdoch [$ not known by this service]
S. D. Abraham [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Sheikh Mohammed al-Amoudi [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Smith and Elizabeth Bagley [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
State of Kuwait [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
State of Qatar [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Stephen L. Bing [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Sterling Stamos Capital Management [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Sultanate of Oman [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Suzlon Energy [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Swiss Reinsurance Company [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Sydney E. Frank Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
T. G. Holdings [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Taiwan Economic and Cultural Office [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Taiwan Government aid agency, an [$ not known by this service]
Theodore W. Watt [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Tom Golisano [Between $10,000,001 and $25 million]
Unitaid [More than $25 million]
Victor Phillip Dahdaleh Charitable Foundation [$1,000,001 to $5.0 million]
Victor Pinchuk, Ukrainian oligarch [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Wallace W. Fowler [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Wal-Mart Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Walter H. Shorenstein [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Walton Family Foundation [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]
Wasserman Foundation [Between $5,000,001 and $10 million]
Zayed Family [Between $1,000,001 and $5.0 million]

CONCLUSION: U.S. DOLLAR REFUNDING MUST PROCEED AS DEMANDED BY THE G-7
Since the State Department controls much of the money operations, it is clear that the objective of the controlling corrupt “powers” has indeed been to continue the fraudulent finance operations from within the White House and the US Treasury for the next four or eight years, as previously: in other words, the fraudulent, debt-generating exotic financing was to continue seamlessly with a replacement set of highest-level fraudulent finance operatives in place, many of whom (led by Mrs Clinton and Rahm Emanuel) were/have been involved in this terrorism financing activity all along.

That is the objective ‘as we speak’. Will it be achieved? It is understood, to begin with, that former President Bill Clinton was captured some time ago on a videotape made in Alabama, referring to President-Elect Obama in disparaging ethnic terms. We have now learned that outgoing President George W. ‘Dog’ Bush is also on record as describing to Mr Obama in comparable language. Both these racist outbursts have been channelled back to the President-Elect, who reportedly laughed at the perpetrators. But ingrained in this response, we were told, was the following message:

‘You can be rude about me now, if you like. But wait and see what I’m made of when I am in power’.

Being interpreted, this means (we speak with ‘understanding’) that if you imagine that you can pressurise me, you have yet to learn what resources I can bring to bear to make you think again.

Therefore, whether the incoming President will in fact allow the fraudulent finance operations to continue seamlessly, thereby ensuring a colossal financial and economic implosion worldwide early in his Administration, the collapse of gigantic corrupted US and foreign institutions, the destruction of his Presidency and Law and Order, and the collapse of the US dollar plus an immediate reversion to ‘beggar-thy-neighbour’ competitive currency devaluations and a bitter global trade war followed by open warfare remains, in our view, on a knife-edge at this time.

• But the central issue THAT NO-ONE CAN POSSIBLY ESCAPE, is this:

DOLLAR REFUNDING CAN ONLY BE DONE BY GENERATING REVENUE, NOT DEBT
The US dollar needs refunding NOW, which cannot be done by the US Government at all, because the US Government CAN ONLY CREATE DEBT.

• IT CANNOT GENERATE REVENUE. No Government can GENERATE TAXABLE REVENUE.

The previous refunding of the US dollar was initiated by President Reagan and confirmed for public consumption by means of a communiqué dated 17th August 1982. The US dollar is in extreme need of a further refunding, to enable it to regain its capitalisation value and thus to renew the world’s international trading markets.

This can ONLY be done by means of the overdue Private Sector Refunding mechanism long since prescribed by the G-7-Approved Refinancing Programme of Capital Markets operations, generating cash REVENUE and not DEBT – with substantial ongoing on-the-books tax accruals paid into the US Treasury, to break the century-long, sterile and now completely discredited US debt-financing orgy which has brought the United States to its current status as a pariah state, reliant on exporting terrorism to ‘get its way’ and provide open-ended pretexts for it to seize the resources of others.

For this US Dollar Refunding Programme to be viable, there must be third party auditing: and the Government and its Presidential Cabinet, with an Economic Team tainted by the fraudulent finance operations of previous Administrations, cannot, in any case, be relied upon, given past experience, to do so in an objective manner.

To preclude a catastrophic perpetuation of the degenerate fraudulent finance carousel system, which is bringing the world financial and real economies to the verge of irremediable breakdown, accompanied by the collapse of colossal financial institutions and the US dollar, full disclosure and disciplined transparent regulation in perpetuity are prerequisites.

NO SOLUTION IS AVAILABLE OTHER THAN ON-THE-BOOKS.

It CANNOT be done off-the-books: and, despite immense Bush-Cheney bribery, if the Rest of the World sees the Obama Administration ‘trying this on’, and sidestepping the precise Group of Seven requirements, there will, as Senator C Dodd has said in another, related, context, be HELL TO PAY.

• WORLD-WIDE HELL TO PAY. THIS YEAR. PROBABLY IN THIS QUARTER.

SUMMARY: If the new Administration follows through with any ‘solution’ falling short of these long outstanding, pre-agreed G-7 standards, THE U.S. DOLLAR WILL COLLAPSE, the whole of humanity will suffer on a scale with no historical precedent, and the American Republic WILL NOT SURVIVE.

As the late, great Sherman Skolnik, who was right more often than wrong (sometimes he was completely off the wall, especially towards the end) used to day: Watch this space.

• References, Notes and the original Ponzi Scheme:

(1) Data courtesy of Victor Thorn, veteran researcher,
journalist and anti-New Underworld Order Author.

(2) Prudent Man Rule: This is the fundamental American principle that is applicable in respect of professional money management, originally asserted by Judge Samuel Putnum in 1830 as follows:

‘Those with responsibility to invest money for others should act with prudence, discretion, intelligence, and regard for the safety of capital as well as income’ [1830 Massachusetts Court decision: Harvard College v. Armory]. The Prudent Man Rule directs Trustees ‘to observe how men of prudence, discretion and intelligence manage their own affairs, not in regard to speculation, but in regard to the management and disposition of their funds, considering the probable income as well as the probable safety of the capital to be invested’. Investments in risky Ponzi and Pyramid Schemes and in ‘programs’ such as those referenced, typically breach the Prudent Man Rule.

Sources: (a) World Reports Limited website report dated 22nd July 2008 entitled: ‘U.S. market revamp is false prospectus’; (b) World Reports Limited website report dated 18th September 2008 entitled: ‘Michael C. Cottrell’s U.S. financial reform proposals; (International Currency Review, Volume 34, Number 1, THE COTTRELL PLAN, pages 243-272 and GLOSSARY, pages 293-326.

(3) On 13th and 22nd January 2007, this service SPECIFICALLY identified the methodology used by the CIA/Bush financial fraudsters as being based on the CLASSIC PONZI MODEL In retrospect, it is clear that few US Ponzi scam victims took the relevance of this on board. Now the name ‘Ponzi’ is finally all over the newspapers: but ONLY, so far, in the Madoff context. It needs to be applied to ALL THE INTERLINKED BUSH-CLINTON-CIA FINANCIAL SCANDALS, RIGHT ACROSS THE BOARD.
It is high time that our message in January 2007 was finally understood: PONZI is the STANDARD METHODOLOGY used for all these scamming operations mounted by criminalised US intelligence-linked cadres, to impoverish and steal from their victims AT HOME AND ABROAD. IT IS STANDARD PROCEDURE. The broken-hearted ‘package people’ investors are classic PONZI SCAM VICTIMS.

This is not, as some knee-jerk hysterics will claim, apologetics for the criminals: IT’S FACT. And the way to deal with FACT, however unpleasant, is to FACE IT. The way NOT to deal with FACT is to place one’s faith in ANONYMOUS SOURCES that, by definition, lack all credibility, whose reporting cannot be verified and which hide behind anonymity so that when they are caught out lying, they cannot be held accountable. These cowards are suspected by sane people of cynically peddling endless tall stories and disinformation that is fed to them for the self-evident purpose of keeping the scammed victims on the edge of their seats until they die. Beware of such faceless charlatans.

• MANY HAVE DIED WAITING FOR THEIR PIED PIPERS TO PLAY THEM A NICE CLOSING TUNE.

Website outlets focusing on keeping the scammed victims expecting payouts have now veered into total chaos mode, blaming everyone on earth from the probably recently deceased Madame Wu to Father Christmas in a deliberately shambolic and thoroughly cynical obfuscation offensive, designed EXCLUSIVELY to protect the perpetrators from the inevitable backlash and retribution that awaits them as soon as the scammed victims finally come to terms with the fact that they have been raped, pillaged, ransacked, and ‘hollowed out’. In readiness for the possibility that they’ll have to keep going for 8 more dreary years, targets have been switched from the Bushes to Obama.

The victims have all along been despised by the primary perpetrators, who couldn’t care less about their plight and are concerned EXCLUSIVELY with the protection of their assets and bodies against the days of reckoning that await them. The fact that the Omega Ponzi operations and related scams against private victims were perpetrated by the criminalised US intelligence community does NOT mean that the perpetrators will not receive their overdue come-uppance: it simply means that a war of attrition has to be waged against these devils, who have wrecked so many Americans’ lives.

(If the Editor is attacked for stating the truth after this posting, we will expose the backing behind the perpetrating website(s) involved in this outrageously cynical disinformation campaign).

The two initial reports in which we SPECIFICALLY exposed the Ponzi scamming dimension, which has of course now finally burst into the ‘mainstream’ with the ‘Madoff takedown’, were as follows:

(a) ‘US intelligence community OMEGA OPS/’Ponzi Game’ frauds’:
13th January 2007.

(b) ‘Treasongate background: Intel Ponzi Scamming:
Classic Ponzi Model for Unregistered Thievery’:
22nd January 2007

The report dated 22nd January 2007 containing our first posting of the summary of the classic Ponzi scam entitled ‘How Charles Ponzi pulled it off: Making a fine art out of a pyramid fraud’, was initially published in International Currency Review, Volume 27, Number 3, December 2001, pages 51-52.

• This text is now repeated immediately below, for ease of reference:

THE ORIGINAL PONZI SCHEME EXPLAINED: AGAIN, IN CASE YOU MISSED IT EARLIER
Charles Ponzi, an immigrant from Italy to Boston, MA, made millions of dollars for a brief period, by exploiting his shrewd observation that while national currencies were fluctuating wildly in 1920, just after the end of the First World War, the Universal Postal Union (UPU) issued coupons which were always worth a given amount of postage stamps.

In those days, European refugees were flocking to the United States, Canada and Brazil; and often, their only contact with their families and friends back home was an occasional letter, enclosing a few dollars. The Universal Postal Union arranged to move the millions of letters, standard business documents and messages across national borders by issuing Postal Reply Coupons. You bought a Postal Reply Coupon in your country of residence, and enclosed it with your letter.

Your mother, once she had received the letter, exchanged the Postal Reply Coupon for stamps at her local post office.

Charles Ponzi told friends in Boston: ‘Everybody’s heard of the Postal Union. They print coupons like these I’m holding here: Postal Reply Coupons. You can send a letter home, or anywhere in the world, with these coupons. And you can trade this coupon for a stamp in any country. I send my mother coupons with every letter that I write home’.

‘Now, in cooperation with certain large businesses in our city, I am making a fortune on the Postal Reply Coupon. Stocks are too risky. Forget it. And bonds, what are they paying right now? Maybe six percent? Savings accounts at Tremont Trust, they’ll give you four and a half cents on the dollar. Give them $100 and they’ll give you back $104.50. I can beat that into the ground’, Ponzi insisted, beating his cane against the floor. ‘My investors get 50 cents on the dollar. Place a hundred dollars with my Securities Exchange Company, and you take out $150. Put that $150 in, you’ll get back $225. That’s right, in six months, you can more than double your money’.

How could he pay 50%, when banks couldn’t even manage 5%? ‘Exchange rates’, Mr Ponzi explained. ‘Every morning I go down and check to see how the lira is doing against the dollar. Usually you get five lire for a dollar. This morning I checked, and with the war just ended, it takes 20 lire to the dollar’. While currency rates were bouncing around like popcorn, Mr Ponzi explained, the Postal Reply Coupon always bought one stamp. Here’s what I do’.

‘I send my cousin in Parma, Italy, $1.0. He exchanges the dollar for lire. With these 20 lire (2,000 centesimi), he can buy 66 Postal Reply Coupons (worth 30 centesimi each, the cost of a letter-sized stamp in Italy). Back in the United States, each of the coupons will buy one stamp, face value five cents. I redeem all 66 coupons for $3.30 worth of stamps. The magic happens in the exchange rate. In America, my dollar buys 20 Postal Coupons. But if I exchange the US dollar for lire, and buy the coupons in Italy, then return and buy the stamps in America, I get $3.30 worth of stamps for that same $1.0. My profit margin is 230%’.

‘Yeah, but $3.30 worth of stamps is still stamps’, complained an attentive listener.

‘I know’, said Ponzi. ‘So I sell the stamps at a 10% discount through my contacts with the larger firms downtown. Deducting the discount, I’ve got $3.0 cash now, from the $1.0 that I started out with.

Now, let’s say, I got that dollar from you. I will pay you back your dollar, plus 50 cents interest. Since I just sold $3.0 worth of stamps, I have a dollar and 50 cents for myself’.

‘I’m going to spend a third of that money on my offices and processing overheads, and a third on commissions and bonuses to my sales people; and then, ladies and gentlemen, I’m going to pocket the other third and take my wife for a stroll’.

This was the essence of the original Ponzi scheme. Note that in this description, Ponzi starts out by exploiting the fluctuations of exchange rates, and the lack of arbitrage; and note that, by the end of the explanation, he is simply offering 50% interest, which he pays out to old claimants out of the additional funds he has received from other investors who are likewise anticipating a 50% return on their investments, within a short space of time.

The germ of the idea was derived from the foreign exchange market; but once Ponzi has realised that people will pour money his way if they are promised a 50% return, he can finally abandon his elaborate explanation (‘his ‘prospectus’) of the exploitation of exchange rate fluctuations and the tedious task of shipping, receiving, handling and exchanging Postal Reply Coupons, which gave him the ‘easy money’ idea in the first place.

In other words, his sales pitch is no more than a now redundant, expendable illustration – a false prospectus which disguises the fact that he is really promoting a pyramid selling operation. For he has realised that all his investors care about is receiving 50% on their money. How this is to be achieved does not normally concern them.

By December 1920, Charles Ponzi was matching old money with ever larger amounts of new money. In May 1921 alone, almost $500,000 of new money poured into the Securities Exchange Company – as 1,500 or more new customers, lured by the 50% yield offered through advertisements, sought their share of the huge profits they thought would be forthcoming at minimal risk. The office now bulged with fat stacks of dollar bills.

THE FLOOR STARTS TO GIVE WAY BENEATH HIM
But problems started to arise when Joseph Daniels filed a lawsuit alleging that he had helped to found the Securities Exchange Company (SEC) with a loan of $230 worth of furniture plus $200 in cash. Daniels had indeed provided the beaten-up desks that had been offloaded in the dusty office, and had let Mr Ponzi have $200 to spark interest in the Postal Coupons.

It wasn’t simply a loan, Mr Daniels maintained, now that Mr Ponzi was drowning in cash. ‘We were partners. I put up capital and property’. On 2nd July, Mr Ponzi was handed a demand for $1.0 million.

The Boston Post telephoned, and Mr Ponzi told the reporter that he had indeed bought furniture from Mr Daniels, but that he had never received any money for investment from him.

But when the newly installed banking commissioner for Massachusetts, Joseph Allen, read the newspaper, he wondered: ‘Where did Ponzi come from? Who are his associates? How is he managing to double people’s money?’

Allen asked Ponzi to pop round to his office, for an interview. The Securities Exchange Company did not describe itself as a bank, nor did it offer any banking services. Therefore, in the absence of a complaint – and none had yet arrived – the Commissioner had no jurisdiction to examine Ponzi’s business. At the interview, Ponzi explained the curiosities surrounding Postal Coupons, pointed out that money chased money, collected his coat, doffed his hat, and bid Mr Allen goodbye.

But Richard Grozier, city editor at The Boston Post, had always thought that Charles Ponzi’s scheme was fraudulent; and to initiate what he fancied would indeed be the inevitable débacle, he elicited a comment from one of Boston’s leading citizens, Clarence Barron, the owner of Dow Jones & Co and The Wall Street Journal.

At the end of July 1920, The Boston Post carried a front page story entitled: ‘Clarence Barron questions the motive behind Ponzi’s scheme’.

Theoretically, Barron admitted, you could indeed turn a profit on the UPU coupons. But that was the only truth buried within the operation. You could never earn more than a few thousand dollars, not just because of the trouble involved in offloading the stamps and tracking the various conversions driving the process, but because there simply were not enough coupons available.

France, Romania and Spain had just abandoned the scheme, a few months earlier. A cursory check with the UPU showed that they had a few hundred thousand dollars’ worth of coupons in circulation – nowhere near the $10 million or $15 million Mr Ponzi claimed to be trading. So where was Ponzi getting his coupons from? Furthermore, the US Postal Service had announced, on 2nd July 1920, that Postal Reply Coupons would no longer be redeemable in lots larger than ten. So how was Ponzi converting his coupons into stamps?

Finally, Barron asked, if Ponzi is doubling everyone else’s money, why does he keep his own funds in regional banks? The Boston Post knew that Ponzi kept millions of dollars on deposit at seven or eight New England banks, and that the accounts were ballooning. How could a man who was paying 100% interest every 90 days, put up with drawing just 4% on his holdings? Barron concluded:

‘Right under the eyes of our Government, Mr Ponzi has been paying out US money to one line, with deposits taken from a succeeding line’ (another bank).

All of a sudden, all the doors which had flown back on their hinges at the sight of Mr Ponzi, were slamming tight shut. The Massachusetts District Attorney ordered Ponzi to cease and desist. His customers demanded their money back, and Ponzi was eventually jailed for Federal mail fraud, then deported. He wound up destitute in South America.

(4) The following documents were obtained by the Editor from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in December 2008:

1: Securities and Exchange Commission COMPLAINT vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791 filed 4:51pm 11 December 2008.

2: Securities and Exchange Commission COMPLAINT vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791 (LLS): Appointment of Receiver, Lee Richards, partner of Richards Kibbe & Orbe LLP ‘over all the assets and accounts of defendant Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“BMIS”) outside of the United States, to take control forthwith over BMIS’s dealings and transactions with any non-United States entity or counterparty, with full access to BMIS’s books and records necessary or useful to him in the exercise of his powers over BMIS’s foreign business or transactions’ signed by United States District Judge Louis L. Stanton at 6.42pm on 12th December 2008.

3: Securities and Exchange Commission ORDER vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791 (LLS) ECF Case: Order to show cause, Temporary Restraining Order and Order Freezing Assets and Granting Other Relief; Order consented to by defendants and therefore signed off by United States District Judge Louis L. Stanton at 4:51pm on 13th December 2008.

4: Securities and Exchange Commission and Securities and Investor Protection Corporation ORDER vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791: Appointing Irving H. Picard as Trustee and law firm Baker & Hostetler LLP as Counsel for the Trustee ‘with all the duties and powers of a Trustee as is prescribed by the Securities Investor Protection Act’, and inter alia authorising the Trustee ‘to take immediate possession of the property of the Defendant, wherever located, including but not limited to the books and the records of the Defendant, and to open accounts and obtain a safe deposit box at a bank or banks to be chosen by the Trustee’: signed by United States District Judge Louis L. Stanton at 4:08pm on 13th December.

5: Securities and Exchange Commission and Securities and Investor Protection Corporation ORDER vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791: Application to the Court of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC), signed and filed on 15th December 2008.

6: Securities and Exchange Commission and Securities and Investor Protection Corporation ORDER vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791: Memorandum of Law in support of the application to the Court of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation; signed and filed on 15th December 2008.

7: Securities and Exchange Commission and Securities and Investor Protection Corporation ORDER vs: Bernard L. Madoff and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Defendants: Reference: 08 Civ. 10791: Consent by Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, signed by Bernard L. Madoff as ‘Sole Member’, to the service of the Complaint and the Application by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation, dated, notarised and filed on 15th December 2008.

8: United States of America v. Bernard L. Madoff: Case # 08 MAG 2735: AGREEMENT TO FORFEIT PROPERTY, signed by Bernard L. Madoff and Ruth Madoff on 17th December 2008 and filed on that date. The property forfeited: 133 East 64th Street, Apt 11A/PH, New York, NY 10065; 410 N. Lake Way, Palm Beach, FL 33480; 216 Old Montauk Highway, NY 11954.

9: Extensive miscellaneous related documentation.

George Orwell: ‘In an age of deceit, speaking the truth is a revolutionary act’.

US friend: ‘You are to be congratulated on a masterful piece of research in exposing the treason and the biggest heist in history’.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

U.S. JUDGE ISSUES A WARRANT FOR PAULSON’S ARREST

PAULSON SERVED, SAYS HE WILL PAY, THEN FAILS TO DO SO

Sunday 2 December 2007 01:12

UPDATE, 7TH DECEMBER 2007:

The criminal operatives are playing games and have again deceived the Ambassador, Mr Cottrell, and his associates. They have failed to meet undertakings and the Ambassador’s communications have been completely inactivated. All restrictions on exposure, which were imposed following our report dated 2nd December 2007, are therefore being treated as yet another deception, and we will be reporting on the latest deception operations perpetrated against the Ambassador as soon as
the necessary information is to hand. No attention will be paid in the future to any blandishments from corrupt US official sources to the effect that we should ‘cool it’ and make life easier for them.

The record shows that every time we accommodate such deamnds (which the Editor has at times done voluntarily, out of courtesy) the Ambassador and his colleagues are double-crossed. This statement will serve as notice that no further attempts to silence us in the face of these ongoing financial fraud outrages will be tolerated. If they want total exposure war, that’s what they’ll get.

UPDATE, 4TH DECEMBER 2007:

As reported below, the warrant issued for Paulson’s arrest on Friday was a ‘performance’ warrant (subject to performance). Quick as a flash, having advised the Judge, on being served the warrant, that he (Paulson) had not been aware that President George W. Bush Jr. had authorised the Wanta payment, Paulson said he would contact the White House. However the Federal Judge preferred to hear the matter from the President himself and, according to our very best sources, the Judge duly telephoned the President who said: ‘Yeah, the payment is authorised for Monday’, or words, to that effect. Of course, President 43 then, on Monday, reneged on his undertaking to the Judge, as there has been no indication of payment having been made whatsoever. This was confirmed to the Editor from multiple sources. The overall situation has thus precipitated a flurry of legal and WCJ activity concerning which we currently have only partial information, which requires further confirmation; so we are not reporting it at present.

There appears to be confusion over the perception that Basel II is supposed to take effect in the United States on 1st January 2008, which is beside the point. The United States is BUST. Basel II took effect in Europe and elsewhere effective 10.00 a.m. EDT last Saturday, and European banks cannot operate with US banks that are non-compliant. We understand that to shore up the situation, significant volumes of funds are being repatriated ‘as we speak’ from Dubai, China and elsewhere. The Federal Reserve Basel II document dated 2nd November sent to us by the Fed and referenced below, specifically leaves the date of Basel II implementation BLANK, which implies that arguments continued between the Americans and the Europeans right through November on this point.

As for the fact that Paulson surfaced on Monday at a conference, where he was televised, this is neither interesting nor relevant. Some people think this proves that we are wrong: but THEY are misguided. The facts published below were correct as posted. Paulson disappeared on Sunday and it was then thought that he was ‘on the run’. It was not THEN known that he had wriggled out of the situation he faced (in collusion with the President), by the duplicity outlined above. This is a fast-moving crisis and superficial assertions claiming that such and such a fact does not compute, need to be withheld, and the situation understood in that context, and pending further information.

It need hardly be added that this is by far the worst financial crisis in world history, and that all the Wantagate reports to date have pointed to this all along. There should be no cause for surprise.

The report dated 2nd December is as follows:

TREASURY SECRETARY OPENLY BOASTS THAT ‘BUSH CANNOT FIRE ME’

SUGGESTION THAT PAULSON MAY BE BLACKMAILING PRESIDENT BUSH

UNCERTAINTY OVER FULFILMENT OF PERFORMANCE-RELATED WARRANT

‘BASLE II’ ON-THE-BOOKS REGIME STARTED UP ON 1ST DECEMBER 2007

WITH NO WANTA PAYMENT, U.S. MONEY CENTER BANKS ARE BUST

THEY NEED ON-BALANCE SHEET FUNDS TO OFFSET THEIR LIABILITIES

CATASTROPHIC FINANCIAL SECTOR AND ASSET IMPLOSION LIKELY

SATURDAY SEARCH TEAMS OUT LOOKING FOR PAULSON WHO IS ON THE RUN

DELIBERATE GERMAN-LED NAZI-SPONSORED ‘TAKEDOWN’ OF ‘THE MAIN ENEMY’

BANK OF ENGLAND, NORTHERN ROCK AND THE ISRAELI EMBASSY IN LONDON

WIKIPEDIA RECONFIRMS THE U.S. DISINFORMATION APPARAT’S OLD LIES ABOUT WANTA:
• See the Wicked Pedia section below the Legal Information, at the foot of this report…

‘But thus saith the Lord, Even the captives of the mighty shall be taken away, and the prey of the terrible shall be delivered: for I will contend with him that contendeth with thee, and I will save thy children’. Isaiah, Chapter 49, verse 25.

For background, please see the last FOUR OR FIVE Wantagate reports: Archive

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for ‘Wantagate’ reports since April 2006. [Note: A new panel giving details of our latest publications as they are made available, has been added].

• Please Make a Donation to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing financial global corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial corruption and global financial crisis in history. This website has been calling the shots, because of the hijacking of Wanta’s Settlement.

• The Editor is extremely grateful to the generous Americans and others who have so thoughtfully contributed funds to assist us with these exposures. He has now written to everyone around the world who had contributed by 27th November 2007, to thank them for their generosity.

• Emails addressed to us which lack coordinates identifying the sender will be trashed unread. The Editor publishes all his coordinates, as has always been the case, as he has nothing to hide. Others should do the same. Also, we trash any emails unread that are not ‘on message’.

• It would be appreciated if webmasters would refrain from lifting our material without proper adequate attribution. Manifestly, the material may be used with attribution, but any other use is illegal and unethical. We also protest at people picking at our original research and posted reports, and crediting themselves rather than the Editor/this website.

Such behaviour is particularly prevalent in the United States, where lies are a way of life with some people, and is an example of the kind of dishonesty that we are exposing in these reports.

• THE PRECEDING REPORT WAS ILLEGALLY ‘SNIPPED’ TWICE. BY DOING THIS STUFF,
U.S. SPOOKS REVEAL WHAT IS WORRYING THEM: SEE ‘SNIP’ AT THE FOOT OF THIS REPORT.

In the following analysis, we provide geopolitical context for the quite extraordinary developments recorded below, by describing long-range pan-German geopolitical global hegemony strategy which is the underlying causation of what is happening today.

In May 2003, an Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) operative accurately stated to the Editor that the problems that the world in general, and America in particular, faces, were primarily attributable to the working-out of this strategy, which has been controlled by George Herbert Walker Bush for years. The reader who may be impatient to absorb the latest (sensational and deeply disturbing) intelligence reported below, may wish to skip the geopolitical and historical context initially, and to return to it after reading up on the current situation.

THE ‘MAIN ENEMY’ (BRITAIN AND AMERICA) FACING DISASTER
The state of affairs that will be described below, containing the latest Wantagate intelligence available to the Editor of International Currency Review, represents an outline description of the worst financial and economic crisis in world history, brought about by blackmailing traitors at the highest level of the US Government, working secretly for foreign powers, with the intention of:

1. Destroying the US and British financial economies.

2. Buying back their depressed assets with illegally stashed, untaxed stolen fiat money held offshore, at firesale prices (the Fascist control model).

The Governments involved in this operation are led by Germany (via the Nazi strategic continuum, Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD), Dachau), through DVD’s bank, Deutsche Bank, aided and abetted by France these days under Nicolas Sarkozy, a Zionazi Mossad operative, and watched from the sidelines (as far as we can tell) by the disgusted Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin’s ‘former’ USSR, and by the severely wronged Chinese authorities (whose position is almost impregnable, enabling them to buy up US assets with real money).

HISTORICAL AND GEOPOLITICAL BACKGROUND TO TODAY’S CRISIS
In what follows it should be specifically recalled that National Socialism (Nazism) and International Socialism (Communism) are dialectical ‘opposites’ (Thesis, Antithesis) manipulated by globalist controllers to yield the intended Synthesis (global hegemony).

• We have on several occasions illustrated this reality in our publications by displaying a Labour Day medal used by the Nazis in the early years of the last century. It depicts a bas-relief head of Karl Marx, a hammer and sickle, and a swastika, all on the same image.

ANGELA MERKEL IS A ‘FORMER’ COMMUNIST AGITPROP OPERATIVE
Therefore, the political antecedents of German Chancellor Angela Merkel DO NOT CONTRADICT the political pedigree of the Nazi strategic deception continuum, Deutsche Vertiedigungs Dienst, in the slightest, in this context. Frau Angela Merkel was an activist in the East German Communist Party, and while she was attending Karl Marx University in East Berlin, she was the Secretary for Agitation and Propaganda in the Communist Youth Wing operating in that establishment.

The East German secret police, the STASI, operated throughout the Cold War period as a foil and substitute for the pan-German Nazi Abwehr (military counterintelligence), today’s DVD. Merkel is almost certainly a ‘former’ STASI operative. Hence her recent visit to see George W. Bush Jr. in Texas, will have presented no anomalous political obstacles at all for either party.

It will be recalled that, all of a sudden in August and September 1991, Gorbachev (real name Orbach or Korbach), a dedicated and ruthless Communist all his life, suddenly ‘ceased’ to be a Communist, along with most of his associates. He then became, overnight, persona extremely grata as he was extravagantly feted by stupid media people, the Rockefellers, et al, all over the United States.

Thereafter, ‘former’ STASI operatives and Communists poured into the German political structures and surfaced all over the United States, while the European Union Collective expanded eastwards, to embrace the host of ‘non-Communist’ actives who had likewise relabelled themselves politically, so everything was just dandy.

Many of these people (such as a certain Siim Kallas, Vice President of the European Commission, a ‘former’ KGB operative and then Governor of the Estonian Central Bank who had been forced to resign under somewhat curious circumstances involving some missing gold), today run and control the European Union Collective (or Europaische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft, viz. European Economic Community), as predicted in a Nazi compendium of that title, published in Berlin in 1942.

A BRILLIANTLY SUCCESSFUL GEOSTRATEGIC DECEPTION
This brilliant strategic deception demarche against the West reflected the specific implementation of the ‘Trojan Horse’ strategy outlined by Mr Gorbachev, and by Soviet long-range strategists like Georgi Arbatov, who explained to anyone who would listen (and there were few) that the intention was to establish political hegemony over ‘Europe from the Atlantic to Vladivostok’.

Within this strategy, as explained in the Editor’s book The European Union Collective, the pan-Germans represented by DVD, Dachau, have their own agenda, initially labelled ‘Europe from the Atlantic to the Urals’. For the sake of revolutionary expediency, Germany and the covert Soviet Union work together at the intelligence level in furtherance of the ultimate Illuminati objective of One World (The New Underworld Order).

IMMINENT FINANCIAL CALAMITY = THE MATURITY OF THIS STRATEGY
The forgoing summary of the geopolitical background to what is about to be revealed here has been placed at the TOP of this report so that those who have ears to hear and eyes to see will IMMEDIATELY UNDERSTAND that the crisis that is about to unfold (run and directed by Paulson, Bush Jr. and Cheney) is a direct and specific consequence of the maturity of long-range strategic deception operations designed to ‘take out’ the ‘Main Enemy’, namely Britain and the United States (in the lexicons of BOTH Nazism and Communism).

So, as the crisis unfolds, remember that we are being taken to the cleaners by malevolent foreign powers, assisted by brazen traitors who operate with impunity at the highest levels in the United States Government who (we now say unequivocally) should at once be made to face the severest penalties. As for the Central Intelligence Agency, which is supposed to defend the United States against subversion, it is perfectly clear to this Editor (and to senior British intelligence generally) that far from defending the American people and the United States, the CIA is a criminal instrument that has been fatally penetrated by malevolent foreign powers, and exists in a morass of confusion.

On Saturday, Paulson was reported by multiple sources to be ‘on the run’ and was STILL stealing money via the ‘grey screen’ unit, as previously revealed. He was scheduled to attend a meeting on Monday, to be attended also by the media, at which the ‘sub-prime’ crisis will be the focus.

‘BASLE II’ ON-THE-BOOKS BANKING SYSTEM IS NOW IN EFFECT
The other key point to take on board, before we elaborate, is that the Basle II standard took effect from 1st December 2007, and that the ‘intention’ had been for the Wanta Settlement (and for the related payments) to be paid PRIOR TO the Basle II accord coming into effect. Under Basle II, no further off-balance sheet financial operations are allowed, and every transaction must take place on-balance sheet. The Europeans, Japanese, Australians etc have implemented Basle II and the United States has no choice but to follow suit. It could not procure its delayed application.

The Federal Reserve duly sent the Editor of this service a copy of its 404-page book entitled ‘Basle II Final Rules: Federal Reserve Board Open Board Meeting: November 2, 2007, 10.1.m. EDT’, which summarises the on-balance sheet rules to which all US banks must now conform. The final official document stated, as previously noted, that ‘This final rule is effective [INSERT DATE]’, implying that the date of implementation had been uncertain. However, Basle II TOOK EFFECT FROM 10.00 A.M. EST ON SATURDAY 1st DECEMBER 2007. Period.

U.S. MONEY CENTER BANKS FACE IMMINENT COLLAPSE
Since the US money center banks’ liabilities must now be covered by relevant proportions of funds held ON-BALANCE SHEET, Citibank, Bank of America, Wachovia and JPMorganChase (plus, under separate securities industry rules and regulations, key securities houses) may well find themselves bankrupt within seven days, given that, as of this posting, the Wanta ‘real money’ settlement funds (and consequential payments held up by the scamming operations described here and in previous reports), have not been paid and are therefore not available on-balance sheet.

The entire world therefore faces an imminent financial and economic catastrophe of historically unprecedented proportions, as Her Majesty The Queen feared when she told the G-8 Meeting last June that the Wanta payment should be made ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’; and we will now explain both how what the Queen feared is coming about, and why it is obvious that this is an intentional, long-planned take-down of the complacent, corrupt twin economies of the ‘Main Enemy’ perpetrated by foreign powers masquerading as ‘friends’ but which are seeking to overturn the outcome of the two World Wars, with the assistance of US traitors at the highest levels.

NAZI STRATEGIC CONTINUUM SPECIFICALLY PREDICTED THIS CRISIS
This outcome was specifically predicted by the Nazi strategists, as we have repeatedly explained – first, in the Madrid Circular Letter intercepted by the Allies en route from the German Geopolitical Centre, Madrid, in the early 1950s, which contained the telling slogan ‘Fur uns ist der Krieg niemals vorbei’ (‘For us the war never ended’); and secondly, in a strategy document seized by the Allies in 1945, which summarised pan-German long-range strategy with the slogan ‘We intend to build the Thousand-Year Reich upon the ruins of the United States’, an intention obliquely promulgated by the operating head of DVD, George H. W. Bush Sr., when he referred in 1991 to ‘a thousand points of light’ and promulgated the ‘New World Order’.

EXECUTIVE BRANCH USURPING CONGRESSIONAL POWERS
At the round-table conference held in Washington, DC, while the Ambassador’s diplomatic party were languishing in the Starbucks coffee house having been thrown out of Citibank’s Midtown office, 399 Park Avenue, New York, representatives of various Federal Departments and agencies, including the Treasury, sliced and diced the $1.575 trillion of ‘real money’ tax that will be payable by Ambassador Wanta after his agreed-upon $4.5 trillion had been paid to him – which it hadn’t, and hasn’t. Details of this outrage were explained in recent reports.

Specifically, we explained in simple terms that the Executive Branch was therefore engaged in a direct usurpation of the powers of Congress to allocate appropriations for the Executive. We have also pointed out that Henry M. Paulson, the US Treasury Secretary, having withheld $1.575 trillion from the Treasury for nearly 18 months, and having further authorised the ‘slicing and dicing’ of the unpaid $1.575 trillion so that it would bypass the Treasury and the Federal Budget, was manifestly a traitor to the American people and to the Constitution, and should be impeached. All that is on the record, for posterity. No-one has denied a single point that we have made on this, or ANY, score.

CONGRESS GOES ALONG WITH TRASHING THE U.S. CONSTITUTION
It has also transpired that our assessment of the attitude of Congress to this travesty was correct – namely, that BOTH parties in the House and the Senate WANT TO AVOID THE AUDITS that will ensue (as we pointed out) arising from the 18 months’ illegal delay in placing the $1.575 trillion of tax at the Treasury’s disposal. It is STILL intended to bypass the Treasury altogether.

In other words, they intend to take not the slightest notice of the constitutional and treachery points we have made, and to ride roughshod over them, just as they have ignored the endless breaches of the Statutes and regulations listed in the legal sections of these reports. This again confirms that these arrogant, corrupt US operatives COULD NOT CARE LESS THAT THE RULE OF LAW HAS COLLAPSED ON THEIR WATCH, AND THAT THEY ARE OPENLY TRASHING THE CONSTITUTION.

And we have been told categorically that the reason why both political parties (or wings of the controlled political dialectic) in Congress are content for Congress’s appropriation powers to be blatantly flouted by the Executive in this way, is that both parties are up to their necks in this financial corruption and hence are traitorously prepared to junk the US Constitution in order to avoid the consequences for Representatives and Senators personally, that would ensue.

In this connection, it is no coincidence that Trent Lott, Dennis Hastert, and others are leaving early without waiting to the end of their terms: as indicated earlier, if they leave the Legislature BEFORE indictment, they retain their HUGE PENSIONS, whereas if they are indicted, they lose their pension entitlements. Likewise, officials have been leaving the Bush White House quicker than rats can eat through sacks. Soon, there will be no-one but the janitor and ghosts left to protect the President.

SARKOZY AND BUSH DECIDED TO STEAL THE FUNDS FOR TRADING
The latest variant on this dimension is that Nicolas Sarkozy, the new, dubious French President of Hungarian Jewish background (who was charged by the World Court prior to coming to office, with the task of procuring the Wanta Settlement) reached an understanding with President George W. Bush Jr. when he visited him recently, that the $1.575 trillion ‘tax’ would in fact not be available until 2008 and would be stolen and used for (illegal) trading purposes, would not go anywhere near the US Treasury’s books and the US Federal Budget process, and would therefore be withheld from the US military. It accordingly appears that the notorious DC round-table conference held on 20th November was allowed to go ahead, but that it may just have represented yet another blind and a deception operation, to divert attention from what we have just stated above.

THREE SIMPLE DEMANDS MADE BY THE AMBASSADOR’S PARTY
We have also reported that Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., the Executive Vice President and Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc, had placed three straightforward demands down on the table for Citibank’s attention, following the three diplomats’ disgraceful treatment by Citibank on 20th November, when they were chucked out of 399 Park Avenue at the demand of co-conspirator Mr Robert Rubin, in the actual presence ‘upstairs’ of George Bush Sr. himself, by Boston Properties, after two armed NYPD policemen had been summoned to the premises.

It will be recalled that in September 2007, Citibank had gone through the motions of ‘inviting’ the Principals to meet with a private banker, in order to complete the necessary formalities, and that the Ambassador and Mr Cottrell took Citibank at its word, resulting in the earlier fiasco described back in early October. Since the bank suggested this procedure, they ‘went along’ with it.

As a continuation of this theme, following the outrageous treatment of the diplomats on 20th November, Mr Cottrell was left with no choice but to lay down three conditions under which the Ambassador’s party would now be prepared to return to the bank to ‘finalise the paperwork’, as previously described. Crucially, however, payment of Wanta’s $4.5 trillion had been ordered to be effected via Treasury Direct as long ago as June 2006, and that order still stands – so that these Citibank arrangements were in fact completely unnecessary, being clearly designed IN BAD FAITH exclusively to enable Citibank to remain in control of the $4.5 trillion in perpetuity.

Nevertheless, since this was how Citibank were ‘playing’ the matter, Mr Cottrell ‘accommodated’ the bank on this score, in accordance with its requests. The bank fell into its own trap: because of course, the bank had never intended to convey the funds to the Ambassador at all.

ALL INTERESTED PARTIES WERE ADVISED OF THE SITUATION IN TIMELY FASHION
At the same time, the Principals, tired of waiting for a period that wound up lasting for 40 days, for Citibank to fulfil its obligations towards them, distributed a letter summarising the position, to the Joint Chiefs, the White House, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Treasury, the Department of Justice, the Supreme Court, Foreign Ministers and other interested parties in November, just to make sure that all concerned were equipped with the SAME information and therefore to pre-empt disinformation offensives such as those itemised in the preceding report.

The essence of the three basic conditions laid down by the Principals following their disgraceful treatment and the insults meted out thereby to the diplomatic community generally by Citibank, already described, was as follows (precis by the Editor)

• Due to the ill-treatment afforded to the Ambassador’s diplomatic team by Mr Richard Lava et al at Citibank, 399 Park Avenue on the 20th November 2007, when the Principals’ purpose had been to facilitate the amicable release of the Master Custodial Account and the $4.5 trillion owned by the Ambassador to him as Principal for his benefit, the Ambassador and his colleagues requested:

• A letter of invitation addressed to Chairman Lee Wanta and Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. as Consul General, to meet with a Citibank private banker (as Citibank had originally suggested in September) for the purpose of signing the Master Custodial Account documents and in order to set up a Master Custodial corporate account for AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., within Citibank Private Banking.

• The provision by Citibank to the Principals of confidential bank confirmation detailing the current Master Custodial Account coordinates verifying the $4.5 trillion held by Citibank for and on behalf of Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta.

• The provision by Citibank of $1.0 million AS A DEBIT AGAINST THE MASTER CUSTODIAL ACCOUNT, to bank coordinates provided by Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. for and on behalf of Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., as Consul General (detailed diplomatic information is not being supplied for public consumption at present), on behalf of Ambassador Wanta and his corporation.

THE RATIONALE BEHIND THE THREE DEMANDS
Now, as Executive Vice President and Treasurer of the Ambassador’s Commonwealth of Virginia-based corporation, Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. was fully within his rights to make such requests, not only because Citibank had of course never divulged that it had misappropriated and diverted the Ambassador’s funds, but also because there could be no possibility, after the way the diplomats were treated by Citibank on 20th November 2007, of the Ambassador’s party returning to the bank without the necessary written invitation (on Citibank’s letterhead), the provision of the coordinate details confirming the presence of the funds, and a necessary ‘good faith’ payment to defray the party’s expenses, and to procure that there could be no question of Citibank sending them on a further wild goose chase – given that the diplomats had been given the cynical run-around for 40 days on the earlier occasion, and for 18 months since Henry M. Paulson first illegally hijacked the Ambassador’s funds in June 2006.

We have previously mentioned that a source (a CIA operative) emailed us (on 28th November) with the following comment; ‘Certain folks were upset with your MC as he was making certain demands in a way that was not appreciated’. Sure, and the reason the ‘demands’ were ‘not appreciated’ was that, once again, the Ambassador and his colleague had called Citibank’s bluff, since for the bank to have complied with Mr Cottrell’s requirements would have placed Citibank (through its own fault) in the position of committing bank fraud in view of the fact that Citibank had tampered with the Ambassador’s funds for the preceding 18 months. But Mr Cottrell was doing no more than taking Citibank up on its original (BAD FAITH) offer, to meet a Citibank private banker, etc.

THE BANK’S REQUIREMENTS ARE SUPERFLUOUS: PAYMENT IS BY ‘TREASURY DIRECT’
Essentially, since the funds have been payable by Citibank via Treasury Direct ever since June 2006, which is what should happen without further complications – so that Citibank’s ‘requirements’ were both superfluous and illegal – Mr Cottrell, knowing that Citibank were deceiving him and the Ambassador, as well as the CIA (see below), conformed to the bank’s requirements and continued to press for the necessary meeting with a Citibank private banker etc. Since Citibank, AS USUAL, were not being straight with the Ambassador, Mr Cottrell gave the bank a choice, working within the bank’s own parameters, of committing a felony, or committing a felony

Citibank, under its new directorship (Robert Rubin having evidently fled, as co-conspirator with Bush Sr. and Cheney when they tried to divert the entire $4.5 trillion to the Middle East on 20th November), wrote a letter stating that, in the circumstances, it was prepared to meet Mr Cottrell’s (understandable) demands. This letter was presented to a Supreme Court Justice and to President George W. Bush jR. for their approval. This appears to have been given. A high-level meeting took place in Washington, DC, at 10.00 a.m. on Friday 30th November, at which it was finally decided that Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta must be paid. Put another way, it was ‘finally decided’ that the corrupt and deliberate ongoing frustration of the remittance of funds that the Ambassador owns, should cease forthwith, not least given the imminent imposition of the Basle II banking environment.

DESPITE HIGHEST-LEVEL APPROVALS, LEGAL ADVISORS SAID ‘NO WAY’
At the same time, DOD Internal Affairs got in touch with Citibank, and asked them: ‘HOW are you going to do this’ (without committing a felony)?’ Legal officials servicing the bank agitated that the bank could not meet Mr Cottrell’s demands because if it were to do so, the bank and its directors would be committing bank fraud.

In other words, Mr Cottrell had called the bank’s bluff, a fact which was twisted by the CIA operative in the mentioned email to read that Mr Cottrell was ‘making certain demands in a way that was not appreciated’. But what was ‘not appreciated’ was that Mr Cottrell had deftly exposed the fact that the bank is engaged in a massive ongoing fraud in collaboration with traitors occupying the highest posts in the United States. That was ‘what was not appreciated’; and the contrary assertion reeked of twisted hypocrisy on the part of the operative and the disinformation cell concerned. Mr Cottrell only asked the bank to do what it wanted to be done – which is called a ‘sting’ in the US intelligence (STUPIDITY) community’s own distorted world, a.k.a. calling the bank’s bluff.

PRESIDENT BUSH FINALLY ‘AGREED’ TO WANTA’S PAYMENT
As a result, President George W. Bush finally decreed, at 1.12pm on Friday 30th November, that Ambassador Wanta was to be paid immediately, not least given that the Basle II environment would be launched the following morning.

Faced with this supposed (but false: see below) ‘fait accompli’, Henry M. Paulson now refused to comply. It has since transpired that not only has Paulson been proclaiming that he will ‘NEVER’ pay Ambassador Wanta, but also, get this, that ‘President Bush cannot sack me’.

He has been making this statement quite extensively. And he’s now been joined by other ‘civilian’ Federal officials, the chorus being that ‘we will never, ever pay Wanta a penny’. This has naturally gone down like a lead balloon within the Central Intelligence Agency itself (of all places) , which has suddenly ‘switched sides’ and is DEMANDING that Mr Paulson procures the payment – over which HE RETAINS, AS FROM THE GET-GO, SOLE SIGNATORY POWER – immediately.

• The CIA has lost patience because payments that it needs urgently are stalled. Quite so.

PAULSON APPEARS TO BE BLACKMAILING PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH
The only possible conclusion to be drawn is that Paulson has ‘something over’ George Bush Jr., which is to say that Paulson is blackmailing the President of the United States.

Since George w. Bush Jr. has been systematically engaged from the White House in continuous fraudulent finance operations, not least as originally proposed to him by Paulson himself as soon as Bush had appointed him US Treasury Secretary, the likelihood of this requires no elaboration.

For it is known that on taking up his post, Mr Paulson proposed that Bush, Paulson, Cheney and friends could ‘make a great deal of money for themselves’ by exploiting the $4.5 trillion sent over by the People’s Bank of China for the exclusive personal benefit of Ambassador Wanta.

All that would now be necessary would be for Paulson to hijack the funds and then to facilitate the ‘rental’ of the giga-funds between the coterie of US institutions mentioned in these reports; and everyone could enjoy massive continuing rake-offs. The President approved this scheme, and is therefore vulnerable to being blackmailed himself – by the blackmailing operative who proposed the illegal financial transactions in the first place, namely Henry M. Paulson Jr.

WRIT, SUBJECT TO PERFORMANCE, FOR PAULSON’S ARREST ISSUED, AND SERVED
After Paulson had ‘refused to comply’ with President Bush’s ‘diktat’, a writ for the immediate arrest of Henry M. Paulson Jr. was issued between 3.00pm and 4.00pm EDT on 30th November by a US Federal Judge. Multiple law enforcement and military (‘special forces’) teams then scoured the Washington, DC, and New York areas, looking for Mr Paulson, who had hidden himself during the afternoon. At approximately 4.15pm, the Treasury Secretary was served with the writ for his arrest. It is understood that this was a ‘performance-related’ warrant which, by definition, is dependent upon fulfilment, with non-fulfilment ‘confirming’ implementation of the arrest.

‘I DIDN’T KNOW THE PRESIDENT HAD AUTHORISED PAYMENT’
Paulson then responded with words to the effect ‘Oh, gee, I didn’t realise that the President had authorised the Wanta payment: I’ll check with the White House’. It was subsequently implied that the Treasury Secretary had then ordered the release of Wanta’s funds from Citibank to Morgan Stanley by the Treasury Direct means originally instructed at the outset in June 2006 – thereby, incidentally, confirming (as Mr Cottrell had perceived) that the Citibank procedural ‘requirements’ were entirely fraudulent, which was what Mr Cottrell had had to expose in the way he did. By this means, Henry M. Paulson escaped arrest on Friday afternoon/early evening.

He just told the law enforcement people that he would make the payment.

And then, of course, he didn’t.

SEARCH FOR PAULSON ON SATURDAY 1ST DECEMBER
As of 10.00 a.m. EDT on Saturday 1st December 2007, no evidence had been forthcoming or even appeared to exist, that the $4.5 trillion payment was ever made. No written confirmation had been received by the Principals to that effect, and all enquiries by them to confirm that the payment that Paulson had led the arresting law enforcement officers to believe would be ‘done immediately’, came up dry. As usual, Paulson had lied through his teeth.

Accordingly, while the Editor was being briefed for this report, the writ for Mr Paulson’s arrest was again activated, and we were advised that Paulson would be arrested in the course of Saturday. As can be imagined, this will represent the worst possible scenario given that, as noted, Saturday 1st December 2007 is the first day of the new Basle II on-the-books international banking environment, within which, absent the Wanta payment and its consequential payments, none of the big US banks can balance their books on-the-books, so that most if not all of them will be in default by the end of next week and therefore technically insolvent.

SATURDAY AFTERNOON: NO PAYMENT, PAULSON VANISHES
At 4.00pm EDT on Saturday 1st December, no payment had been forthcoming, and the Treasury Secretary had disappeared. He was therefore being sought by law enforcement, DOD Internal Affairs, and even the CIA’s own agents all over the place. He was to be arrested if he could not provide immediate concrete documentary proof that the Wanta payment has been made, triggering the country and Tier 1-10 payments. The participation of the CIA in requiring the payment indicates that a ‘tipping point’ has taken place, with the CIA now furious that payments are being delayed and no longer (at least not this weekend) trying to undermine the Ambassador’s party with the kind of confused disinformation we had to expose in the preceding report.

[This statement needs to be modified, since the preceding report was ‘snipped’ on 30th November and 1st December, given that we had highlighted odious US deception operations. By ‘snipping’ our reports, operatives REVEAL that we have scored a bullseye, which is STUPID].

PAULSON IS STEALING MONEY EVEN WHILE ‘ON THE RUN’ AND EVADING ARREST
The situation is exacerbated by the fact that this Paulson crook is STILL STEALING MONEY, via the military ‘grey screen’ system, in collaboration with President George Bush Jr. (who, as pre-Provost Marshal-time Commander-in-Chief, would have had access to the necessary military ‘grey screen’ unit which we think he has ‘loaned’ to Paulson).

The fact that Mr Paulson is STILL STEALING MONEY while on the run, and because he thinks he is covered by his blackmail hold over the President, represents the worst display of official financial criminality in the history of the United States.

Furthermore, these crimes are being committed in the face of the arrival of the Basle II on-the-books banking system, with the US banks, led by Citibank, running immense risks because nothing like enough cash is available on the books to cover their liabilities in accordance with the agreed-upon Basle II banking system rules.

• SHARP REACTION TO THIS REPORT RECORDED ON SUNDAY 2ND DECEMBER
In the course of Sunday afternoon, the Editor was informed that there had been sharp reactions to this report (which has been updated, including at this paragraph). It appears that the ‘certain folks’ were not ‘appreciative’ of the fact that their deceptions, slippery snake-like antics and other snide stratagems to try to keep the lid on the worst corruption crisis in world history, was being exposed in ‘real time’ on this website. Our generic response to this ‘line’ remains unchanged: THEY HAVE ONLY THEMSELVES TO BLAME. If they had done what they should have done in June 2006, and paid the Ambassador the $4.5 trillion that belongs to him, none of this would have ‘come out’. As matters stand, it is all ‘coming out’, and the various panic buttons that are now being pressed can do little to alleviate matters for the criminalist cadres involved. IT’S TOO LATE.

Their immediate response has been to ratchet up their regurgitation of old lies and disinformation against the Ambassador, and to goad their scattered disinformation apparat lackeys to promulgate lies and disinformation about the Editor of this service, in a belated attempt to discredit an Editor who has been publishing a global financial journal successfully for nearly 40 years. An example of what is going on is appended below the Legal Section, where we expose the use of Wikipedia to bed down regurgitated ‘old lies’ about Ambassador Wanta. These cannot ‘fly’. But that does not mean that these desperate liars and their odious discrediting teams will not try.

The Editor has asked the appropriate circles to insist that all offensive lies and disinformation, and all attacks on communications facilities of the Ambassador and others, should CEASE FORTHWITH, as a sensible prerequisite to lowering the overall temperature of this crisis. The alternative will necessarily be that the temperature will continue to rise. These idiots have no understanding of psychology. Furthermore, we will interpret any continuation of the disinformation campaign as a clear signal of malevolent intent once the Ambassador has been paid, including an intent to set him up again and to steal the money back from him. That won’t work, either, for ‘special’ reasons: but these compartmentalised criminalist operatives are STUPID and never understand reality.

RATIONALISATIONS OF THIS UNPRECEDENTEDLY RECKLESS CONDUCT
Several parallel explanations of this behaviour can be advanced:

1. This represents a last-ditch feeding frenzy by Paulson and the criminal financial cadres to stash as much stolen money abroad as possible, before they flee. However this is ludicrous, since every cent of what they are stealing and diverting within the US dollar system is being traced in real time.

2. As discussed at the beginning of this report, these people have deliberately created a truly catastrophic situation in accordance with the long-range strategy to generate ‘the ruins of the United States’ upon which these Nazis and Zionazis intended to ‘build the Thousand-Year Reich’. Because their plot has been unravelled here in ‘real time’, it’s not going to work; but what matters with these Luciferians is what is in their minds.

3. They are out of their minds and in Satan’s mind (consistently with 1 and 2).

IRRATIONAL RESPONSE OF ‘WE WILL NEVER PAY WANTA A CENT’
Their display of mad arrogance is accompanied, as noted above, with a chorus of ‘we will never pay Mr Wanta a cent’, which can only be described as an irrational response to the bind in which these Illuminati culprits find themselves, consequent upon their endless criminality. And behind all this lurks the internal anger of the Dark Forces themselves, given that the behaviour of these criminals has alienated key European families and other powerful worldly interests who do not take kindly to being double-crossed and deceived by those with whom they have rashly cooperated in the past. Interfering with such parties’ bank accounts was a bad mistake which is having ‘consequences’.

DEUTSCHE BANK (DVD’S BANK) AT THE CENTRE OF THE CRISIS
It is understood that sitting in the centre of this catastrophic situation is the Nazi Continuum’s very own banking institution, Deutsche Bank. This institution is also alleged to have been implicated in the recent so far unreported attempted (failed) murders of ‘finance ministers’ (in the plural).

The names familiar of Greenspan, Cheney and Paulson are mentioned by intelligence sources, in this very disturbing foreign subversion connection.

Because of Paulson’s interference (which may of course have been deceitfully coordinated with President Bush, as each of these crooks seeks both to blackmail the other and to cover up what has been going on between them at the same time), the big US banks are facing imminent collapse, given the commencement of the Basle II regime, because they cannot evidence moneys on the books to cover their liabilities.

DELIBERATELY CONTRIVED, LONG-TERM FASCIST COLLAPSE
Citibank is bust and the situation facing Bank of America, JP Morgan, Wachovia et al, is precarious in the extreme for the same reason, as there is vastly inadequate liquidity (cash) on the books.

More generally, Paulson has still been ‘out there’ with Bush Jr, playing the SAME game as has continued non-stop since June 2006: ‘It’s not my fault’. The difference this time round is that these reckless criminals are doing this the other side of the looking-glass. Failure to remit the Lee Wanta payment, which is necessary in order to trigger the other appended payments, beyond the deadline for the commencement of Basle II, represents an Act of War against the United States and Britain: and we hereby specifically accuse the German Government of coordinating this operation through DVD, Dachau, in collaboration with its Zionazi colleagues in the State of Israel.

This is a classic Fascist operation, designed to enable the perpetrators to mop up assets at fire-sale prices after a deliberately contrived collapse.

AN INTERESTING IRAQI DIMENSION
In this connection, it is interesting, is it not, that the incidence of deaths in Iraq has suddenly fallen off, as recently announced. The key reason for this is that the terrorist operatives secretly working dialectically with the US revolutionary Government have not been paid, because the Pentagon has run out of cash, as it desperately needs the on-the-books monies that should have been remitted from the Wanta windfall tax payment and subsequent on-the-books tax accruals from transparent financial trading operations under The Wanta Plan.

Deaths have fallen because the deaths provoked by controlled ‘rogue’ US and foreign (including GRU) terrorist cells paid for by the Americans, are not happening, as the controlled terrorists are not being paid. The ‘terror’ in Iraq is a controlled operation designed to provide the pretext for US forces to remain in Iraq indefinitely, so as to (a) perpetuate control the Central Bank of Iraq by the White House (see below) and (b) to sit on top of the country’s colossal reserves of oil.

Remember that the attack on Iraq in March 2003 was a BANK RAID, intended to steal the Central Bank of Iraq’s cash and gold, and to acquire control over Rafidain Bank (which the Nazi-trained intelligence operative Saddam Hussein used as, and considered to be, his private bank and which had accumulated some $100 trillion in fiat money assets that the Bush criminal cadres coveted).

Recall, too, that in order to cover up this bank raid, the Americans deliberately procured that at least 100 special operatives who had been engaged in the seizure of the Central Bank of Iraq and its assets, were all immediately liquidated. The Editor has heard that the figure of about 100 such operatives, which he originally came across in 2003, may have been much higher.

The Central Bank of Iraq APPEARS to be an independent central bank, but in reality it is directly controlled by the Bush II White House. Control of this central bank is crucial to the White House, because control of a tame central bank enables the White House, through the Federal Interbank Settlement Fund, to continue off-the-books fiat money trading operations, the illicit proceeds of which can be permanently hidden from view. In other words, President Bush Jr. has been running this war, and procuring the deaths of Iraqis and Americans in massive numbers, purely for corrupt, Fascist personal profit. He has been doing this against the background of an environment of comprehensive corruption and mutual blackmail in Congress, the Judiciary and the Executive Branch itself – a general circumstance that has given him a sense of immunity and invincibility.

He does not yet appear to appreciate that he, Tony Blair, Rumsfeld and others are considered to be war criminals, given that the entire Iraqi War and occupation are illegal under international law, and that none of these people will be able to travel abroad: the only reason that Blair can travel is that a fake ‘diplomatic job’ was concocted for him to provide him with protection against arrest.

But now that Bush Jr.’s own illegal assets have been frozen (along with the bank accounts of Bush Sr., including those located in Latin America) he cannot continue financing the Iraq conflagration from his own illegal fiat money assets; and since the Department of Defense has no money either (it must work with on-the-books funds, the only source of which is the Wanta taxation windfalls), all of a sudden, the casualty count in Iraq is falling. This has enabled pro-‘surge’ fans to turn round and say ‘we told you so’ – and even previous Congressional antagonists of the ‘surge’ to admit that ‘it’s working’ – without understanding any of the above.

OTHER HORRENDOUS DIMENSIONS OF THIS CRISIS
Several further observations illustrate the far-reaching impact that this historically unprecedented crisis (ignored by the cowardly, bribed ‘mainstream’) is delivering:

• GORDON BROWN IN DEEP, RELATED TROUBLE
As we noted in an Update on 30th November, The Daily Telegraph displayed a huge, cropped front-page photograph of Sub-Prime Minister Gordon Brown with his eyes closed, and apparently in a condition of extreme depression. As we hinted, there must be a reason for this that has nothing much to do with the parallel Israeli-linked ‘donations sleaze’ crisis* that has erupted around the Labour Government and which, coming on top of other catastrophes such as the near-collapse of Northern Rock, and the seizure by Dutch mob fraudsters of the private details held by HM Customs and Revenue of 25 million people in the United Kingdom (followed by daily reports of further huge thefts of data from HM Customs and Revenue) – inducing the fastest collapse of confidence in any British Government ever recorded. [*Note: We believe that this dimension of Brown’s troubles is a ‘satellite’ operation perpetrated by Israeli intelligence, which appears to be engaged in a flanking destabilising offensive, to buttress the horrendous planned ‘takedown’ described in this report].

Here is the real underlying cause of the Sub-Prime Minister’s evidently near-terminal despair.

It will be recalled that some time back we identified the fact that the Bank of England has been running a specialist fraudulent finance boiler-room scam via an operation out of Birmingham. The contract paperwork for this operation, with which the Clintons, Cheney and Bush Sr. were allegedly involved, was lodged off-balance sheet with Northern Rock.

The activity in question was exposed earlier on this website as involving a character named Carl Daniels. We have since learned that transactions in this connection were being conducted from the Israeli Embassy in London. If so, this represents a clear breach of diplomatic protocol and, if the Northern Rock situation now deteriorates, would call for the Israeli Ambassador at the Court of St James’s to be severely reprimanded. This serious development needs also to be seen against the background (a) of the geopolitical analysis presented at the top of this report, and (b) of the sleaze crisis that is engulfing Gordon Brown and his Government, which appears to represent a Black intelligence operation against the British authorities, probably intended to obfuscate any proven complicitly of the State of Israel in the unravelling Wantagate-related financial corruption crisis.

Under the Basle II regime, Northern Rock cannot use these ‘assets’ as collateral (on the books). Aware of this, the Sub-Prime Minister personally authorised the injection of billions of pounds into Northern Rock, to end the images of British people lining the streets to remove their funds from Northern Rock branches, in the first run on a bank recorded in Great Britain for nearly a century and a half. These images, which threatened the reputation of the City of London and implied that Britain was no better than Argentina, did more to destroy Brown’s (false, contrived) reputation than anything else, since lines of people withdrawing their savings from high street banks in the rain, are immediately and rightly blamed on the Government.

Northern Rock is now imminently vulnerable to collapse, as under Basle II, its on-the-books assets must cover its liabilities, which is impossible because the assets provided by the Bank of England’s corrupt ‘back door’ boiler room operation, are all illegal and off-balance sheet.

As noted, Bank of England fraudulent finance operations were being handled with the Clintons, and Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. Hence, when Northern Rock collapses, Gordon Brown collapses with it, as he alone will be blamed. This insight provides the first evidence that the Wantagate scandal ‘connects with’ the Sub-Prime Minister’s own horrendous situation.

Of course, the UK Sub-Prime Minister will ALSO be blamed for everything else that is about to go wrong, too, including the generalised financial and economic crisis that Paulson has precipitated – or will have done if the Principals have not received formal written confirmation this weekend that Paulson has actually procured the transfer that he deceitfully told law enforcement officials on 30th November, that he had ordered.

• The Editor wishes to add that he is in 100% agreement with a sober op-ed article printed in The Daily Telegraph of 3rd December 2007, in which the ‘Conservative’ Party leader, David Cameron, was reprimanded for his extreme cruelty towards Gordon Brown at a Prime Minister’s Questions Show Trial recently. It is reported that the Prime Minister’s hands were trembling, whether in anger or terror, being unknown. The British people, despite their many faults, are HUMANE and will not have taken kindly to this spectacle, which departed from all residual standards of decency, and which will have signalled to all and sundry that this man is ignorant of the word: MERCY.

• DIVERSIONARY GUNMAN EPISODE ORCHESTRATED FOR RODINSKI
It was reported on 30th November that a gunman took some hostages and held them at a Hillary Rodinski Clinton election campaign office. The hostages were released without a shot being fired, indicating that this was a fraudulent diversionary set-up exercise, organised by counterintelligence coming to the aid of its candidate, so as to serve up diversionary headline fodder for the gullible controlled media, thereby deflecting attention from Wantagate and its explosive implications and unpleasant consequences. These may include dire consequences that are liable to swamp lesbian candidate Hillary Rodinski, who has a violent temper and is extremely vulnerable to blackmail and exposure, not least given the small matter of the ‘undeclared $500 million’ (see below).

• BERNANKE AND KOHN DECIDE IT’S TOO HOT IN THE KITCHEN
On 30th November, Dr Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, visited Bank of America at its headquarters in Charlotte, North Carolina (located on the Illuminati’s 33rd parallel).
As previously reported, Bank of America is to serve as the de facto Central Bank of the United States (not a pleasant thought, but it’s factual).

It is understood that both Dr Bernanke and the Vice Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Donald L. Kohn, have both decided that the appalling situation that has cumulatively arisen due to the hijacking of Ambassador Wanta’s funds and Wantagate generally, has become much too dangerous for each of them personally to remain inside the kitchen, and they are accordingly reported to have suddenly ‘changed sides’. Kohn appears to be especially vulnerable, due to his alleged connection with devious Deutsche Bank transactions.

• ABU DHABI FUNDS STOLEN BY CHENEY WHILE JOHNSON WATCHED
The funds that vanished to Abu Dhabi are understood to represent money stolen by Vice President Cheney with the acquiescence (it now appears) of the since discredited Provost Marshal General, Rodney L. Johnson. As noted in the Update posted on Friday 30th November, Cheney checked in to hospital with supposed irregular heartbeat trouble. He makes a habit of checking into the hospital when he finds himself in a fix, and has on several occasions simply walked out of a back door and hired a cab to take him home.

• BANK ACCOUNTS FROZEN, PASSPORTS CANCELLED
In addition to the freezing of his bank accounts, including those in Latin America, George Bush Sr. is reliably reported to have had his passport removed by the State Department; so he cannot leave the country legally. The whereabouts of Mr Robert Rubin, who attempted to steal the $4.5 trillion in collaboration with George Bush Sr., even as Rubin was ordering the owner of the funds and his diplomatic colleagues off Citibank’s Midtown premises, is still unknown to this reporter.

It is believed that Vice President Cheney may have tried to flee the country, but his passport is reported to have been cancelled also. The same applies to former President Clinton, who cannot move abroad either. He is now engaged in a subtle operation to derail his CIA wife’s presidential election campaign, as the very last thing he needs in the White House is this woman who throws ashtrays and lampshades at people and splits their heads open with them, orders her thugs to murder lesbian rivals, and is permanently vulnerable because of her alleged theft of $500 million from Crozier Bank, Grenada, which she failed to declare for tax purposes (because she couldn’t). He’s much safer with her where she is. When four US agents arrived at Crozier Bank (which later closed its doors) to investigate, it was mysteriously discovered that the videotape recording Mrs Hillary Rodinski’s visit, was blank for the duration of her presence at the bank.

THE OBJECTIVE SITUATION ‘AS WE SPEAK’
These details aside, the situation this weekend can be summarised as follows:

• Since the Wanta $4.5 trillion, and the payments it triggers, had not been remitted by the start-up of the Basle II exclusively ‘on-the-books’ financial environment, no large US bank can cover its liabilities with on-the-books assets, which means that there will be bank collapses within a matter of days. The banks are liable, and cannot function without cash on the books under the new regime.

• Foreign powers that are fundamentally hostile to the United States and Britain (‘the Main Enemy’), assisted by traitors in the United States (Bush Sr., Bush Jr., Cheney, Rubin, et al) are intending to procure the destruction of these two economies, with the classic Fascist intention of establishing hegemony over the hated World War II enemy that they anticipated under the slogan ‘Fur uns ist ser Krieg niemals vorbei’ (‘For us, the war never ended’).

• An unprecedented collapse of asset prices is imminent, with the economic and financial consequences foreseen in our report dated 2nd September 2006, plus geopolitical and social outcomes which have the potential to mature into humanity’s worst conceivable nightmares.

• This has all been organised deliberately. That is the only possible explanation, since the only way out is to release the hijacked funds; and yet Paulson, faced with arrest, said he would do just that and then, as usual, failed to do so.

He has openly boasted that President Bush cannot sack him – a claim which appears to be based not only upon the manifestly severe prospective international financial consequences that would ensue if he were to be sacked, but also upon the latent blackmail hold that he clearly maintains over the President. (He couldn’t be bothered to resign within the seven days putatively imposed upon him by the since discredited Provost Marshal some days ago)

NO PAYMENT HAD BEEN MADE BY THE TIME OF THIS POSTING
The situation could probably be saved by release of the Wanta funds and then the linked funds over this weekend, but beyond that, the Basle II effect will overwhelm the US financial system. Of course, the Americans could presumably augment their global pariah status by just ignoring Basle II, in which case New York will rapidly cease to remain a world money center; but that is ruled out by that very consideration itself.

So it looks as though these criminal financial operatives, working for Germany (DVD, Dachau), have every intention of ‘just letting it happen’. They may believe, by now, that they have nothing to lose – whereas, just like the Rest of Us, they will lose everything.

‘SNIP’: THE ILLEGAL ‘SNIPS’ OF OUR REPORT DATED 29TH NOVEMBER

(1) The legal section at the foot of the report was found on Friday 30th November to have been illegally ‘snipped’ at the important subhead that reads: ‘Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance’. All subsequent legal text and notes had been removed, but have now been restored. FACT: These terrified criminals are extremely stupid, which is why it is appropriate to describe the US intelligence community as the US STUPIDITY COMMUNITY. By ‘snipping’ this text, these idiots hereby reveal what is concerning them. Have they only just woken up to the hazards they face?

What was it that was going on earlier in November? Remember when Paulson was found at Citibank on a Saturday over a holiday weekend, and it was discovered that the $4.5 trillion had been moved into a fictitious account with Morgan Stanley for onward conveyance to a third corrupted American institution? Was that not indeed a monumental case of THEFT BY DECEPTION AND FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE? Of course it was.

Now you know why they ‘snipped’ the relevant legal text. In so doing, they revealed that we have correctly hit a nerve, and that they are co-conspirators and accessories to the fact.

(2) FURTHER ILLEGAL ‘SNIP’: On Saturday 1st December 2007, the preceding report was found to have been further ‘snipped’ at point (5), where the Editor cited a comment sent by a CIA operative direct to the Editor in an email. The operative’s statement was as follows: ‘Certain folks were upset with ‘your’ Mr Cottrell as he was making certain demands in a way that was not appreciated’. As we have explained in the present report, Michael Cottrell used deception techniques such as these people routinely use on others. That was why his demands ‘were not appreciated’.

The lack of appreciation reflected the fact that these people had been caught at their own deception game, and had been found of course to have been engaged, as usual, in egregious deception. The Editor was annoyed to have been emailed this observation, as it proved that the sender is an operative, engaged in deception of the Editor himself, which is why he will have nothing further to do with these agents.

LEGAL SECTION:
PEOPLE OUGHT TO READ THIS INFORMATION, AS IT INDICATES THE DEPTH OF THE DEPRAVITY THAT WANTAGATE HAS EXPOSED. CONSTANT REPETITION OF THIS BASIC DATA IS STILL NECESSARY…

• We now repeat, yet again, our familiar summary of the Statutes, securities regulations and fraud information that we have appended to these reports for many months. The reason we append this information is to remind everyone of their clear responsibilities under the US Misprision of Felony legislation, and of course to provide a legal basis for these reports.

LEGAL RECAPITULATION FROM REPORT DATED 30TH AUGUST 2007:
Reiteration of the fraudulent transactions involving Bank of New York Mellon – a bank so arrogant and conspicuously indifferent both to its tarnished reputation and to its grotesque breaches of US law and of N.A.S.D./S.E.C. Regulations, that it now takes first prize in the crowded competition for the title of ‘Most arrogant and corrupt financial institution in America’. At least, this was the case until the perpetration of the ‘Saturday scam’ described above and on 13th November:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scienter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• ‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON IS IN BREACH AND OF WHICH THE SIX ‘LEVY BANKS’ MAY LIKEWISE BE VARIOUSLY IN BREACH [CREDIT SUISSE, UBS, DEUTSCHE BANK, BANK OF AMERICA, CITIBANK, THE BANK OF ENGLAND]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is in violation of:
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR SIR LEO WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT THE HIGHEST U.S. LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006, AND HAVE CONTINUED THEIR SERIAL CRIMES EVER SINCE:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war

This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Wanta’s funds.

The Directors and others listed in Part 1 of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and others posted on 11th June may likewise be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious violation of the laws itemised above. This list is reproduced in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, September 2007, on pages 163-168.

U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: MISPRISION OF FELONY:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

Wicked Pedia Update dated 2nd December 2007:

WIKIPEDIA IS PART OF AN NSA DISCREDITING OPERATION
As previously reported, the Editor’s attention was drawn, in the second half of November 2007, to a pack of old lies, diversionary claptrap and disinformation posted on Wikipedia under ‘Leo Wanta’.

Although this posting appeared FOR THE FIRST TIME on 12th November 2007, it consisted almost entirely of ancient lies, including disinformation dredged out of ‘Thieves’ World’, a hatchet job published in 1994 by Simon and Schuster by the late Claire Sterling, a CIA operative.

Mrs Sterling died suddenly after being summoned for her second meeting with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, under Clinton.

ANCIENT DISCREDITED LIES POSTED IN NOVEMBER 2007
The fact that the OLD Wikipedia lies appeared for the first time as late as 12th November 2007, and consisted almost totally of old, discredited lies, omitting the Master Lie that the CIA retailed after the Ambassador had been taken down, namely that he was DEAD, indicated quite clearly to the Editor and his advisers that this latest evil display of regurgitated disinformation represented a deliberate operation by the US intelligence community’s disinformation and lie machine, to begin, all over again, the process of discrediting Ambassador Leo Wanta – so that they can relieve him of his funds by some false pretext or other after a ‘gag order’ has been signed.

The definitive up-to-date information on the Ambassador’s affairs has been published on this website, and in several issues of International Currency Review, Economic Intelligence Review, Soviet Analyst and Arab-Asian Affairs, all published by World Reports Limited, for several years. Copies of these publications are in official, institutional and library hands all over the world. Therefore, any posting about Ambassador Wanta that relies upon ancient lies and fails to take account of the accurate information that we have published, can easily be demonstrated to represent yet another US intelligence community and NSA discrediting operation.

PRELUDE TO ‘SETTING UP’ WANTA ALL OVER AGAIN
We now understand that the Principals have been advised (for the past several weeks) that they will not be allowed to reveal that they have been paid. This loony state of affairs is designed to ‘set them up’ for a future discrediting operation whereby false witness will be deployed against them to the effect that they have stolen the money, or some such pack of lies, which they will be unable to refute because they will be bound by the ‘prerequisite’ gag order that is intended. Its purpose, of course, is to ‘legitimise’ the old and new lies that the US disinformation apparat will be preparing for future use. The likelihood is that the new discrediting operation will be extended to Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., as well. We are prepared for this intended onslaught.

EDITOR’S TRUE REPORT REPEATEDLY REPLACED BY OLD LIES
On 19th November, the Editor posted on Wikipedia the accurate text about Leo Wanta that is now reproduced below. The Editor’s accurate text was then removed by Wikipedia, leaving the ‘old lies’ that had existed previously. When the Editor became aware of this, he reposted the accurate text below, and, given that his own copy had been deleted, he then deleted the pack of lies, leaving his own accurate text up on the Wikipedia site instead, without the lies.

On 2nd December, the Editor was advised by a monitor that the Editor’s accurate text had been removed and that the old discrediting lies had been reposted on the page by Wikipedia. When the Editor checked, he found that the page could no longer be edited because of what the site managers described as ‘vandalism’.

IIT’S ‘VANDALISM’ TO POST THE TRUTH, NOT ‘VANDALISM’ TO POST LIES
It was not ‘vandalism’ to delete the truth and to replace the truth by old lies, but it was ‘vandalism’ to delete ‘old lies’ and replace them by the truth.

We are therefore able to conclude from this Wicked Pedia outrage, as follows:

1. Wikipedia, which purports to ‘change the world’, prefers lies to the truth.

2. Wikipedia is therefore, by definition, a source of disinformation and lies, and cannot be trusted as a source of reliable information in any context.

3. The only category of sick society that would have any interest in disseminating lies about Ambassador Wanta, the United States’ greatest living patriot, rather than the truth, is the mentally disturbed US counterintelligence disinformation apparat (a.k.a. the US STUPIDITY COMMUNITY) which, by its actions in deleting the Editor’s ACCURATE information and replacing it with old lies, and by its illegal behaviour in ‘snipping’ our website texts as stated above, thereby reveals the desperation of its concerns, which all have to do with covering up official criminality.

4. It is now far too late for the US stupidity community to repair the damage that it has done since June 2006, when the Ambassador’s funds were first hijacked by the criminal financial operative Henry M. Paulson, US Treasury Secretary. So it is laying the groundwork for a renewed discrediting operation against Ambassador Wanta and his colleagues.

• We and others will see to it that this intention is defeated, and that such nefarious scheming is exposed for the amoral and disgusting Luciferian behaviour that it represents.

The ACCURATE text that the Editor posted on the Wikipedia site, follows. (The Editor, after all, PAID FOR AMBASSADOR WANTA’S EXIT FROM PROBATION, FOR GOODNESS SAKE, SO HE CAN HARDLY BE A SOURCE OF DISINFORMATION, CAN HE?). This information will be very widely distributed by other means, in order to provide all concerned with the necessary ‘heads-up’ as to what these US Dark Forces have in mind. They are out of their minds and in Satan’s mind:

The disinformation about Leo Wanta (Lee Wanta) below was first posted on 12th November 2007. It contains ancient CIA disinformation and long since exposed lies going back to the early 1990s, and obfuscates the truth. The report appended immediately below was added on 19th November 2007, to correct the disinformation contained in the original stub.

It was subsequently removed and is hereby replaced. This sequence of events, which suggests that egregious lies are preferred to the truth, has been recorded on www.worldreports.org, which contains all the updated and breaking Wanta material, that was ignored and traduced in the stub at the foot of this report.

THE ACCURATE TEXT THAT WIKIPEDIA REPEATEDLY DELETED
This is the correct information that we posted on 19th November 2007:

The ‘information’ posted below represents a deliberately malevolent, false disinformation picture which has no bearing on reality. It is a travesty of the truth of the matter and cites Christopher Story as the author of some of the disinformation, which is libellous and implies that Story, the veteran
Editor of International Currency Review of nearly 40 years’ standing, is engaged in the egregious dissemination of lies, which is not the case.

This is such an egregiously malevolent stub of disinformation that readers should prudently dismiss it altogether; they should start afresh by accessing Christopher Story‘s website, which is: www.worldreports.org., reading from the Archive.

www.worldreports.org is the authoritative source for all updated information on Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta. The source ‘Thieves’ World’ was a CIA disinformation work prepared by the late CIA disinformation operative Claire Sterling, published in 1994.

This stub regurgitates ancient lies perpetrated by the CIA, which lied for many years that Lee (Leo being his intelligence community name) Wanta was dead. The CIA proclaimed that he was dead so that corrupt cadres could ransack his funds (see below).

He ‘ceased to be dead’ with effect from 21st July 2005 after Christopher Story, a British private citizen, had paid $35,000 from his scarce private funds pro bono publico by way of ‘restitution’ to an American lawyer for onward payment to the Wisconsin State Department of Corrections, to procure Mr Wanta’s release from his illegal probation.

Despite his Ambassadorial status, Wanta had been illegally ‘taken down’ in Switzerland on 7th July 1993 without a warrant on a trumped-up Wisconsin State charge of having failed to pay $14,129 in falsely assessed Wisconsin State fabricated tax that he never owed because he had been resident in Vienna on US Presidential intelligence work since June 1988.

This data is all in the public domain, has been published for several years in International Currency Review, the Journal of the World Financial Community, and can be read on Mr Story’s website.

International Currency Review is a banking and financial journal with a worldwide circulation:
ISSN 0020-6490. It is published by World Reports Limited, London.

Notwithstanding that this fabricated tax demand (orchestrated by US criminal intelligence) had been paid twice under protest by Lee Emil Wanta from abroad (in May and June 1992), the funds were improperly allocated by the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue and were never credited to the false account maintained by them for the Ambassador. (Christopher Story holds documentary
proof of both payments). They were paid a third time by Christopher Story in June 2005, which action duly procured Mr Wanta’s release from illegal probation effective 14th November 2005.

As a consequence of Wanta thus ceasing to be dead, the CIA’s lie that he was dead collapsed in chaos, and all the subsidiary old false witness lies that the CIA had perpetrated, including those assembled for disinformation purposes in the stub below (which, in line with the standard false witness used throughout by detractors, attempts to portray Christopher Story as a source of disinformation) were discredited as well.

Why was Wanta taken down? So that the criminal intelligence cadres running the US Government could ransack the $27.5 trillion of funds assembled by Leo Wanta on President Reagan’s orders, in the course of his Financial Warfare operations against the USSR.

Under Reagan’s Executive Order 12333 of 1981, US intelligence officers were permitted to establish corporations which could thereafter contract with the CIA/DIA/DEA/NSA et al for the purpose of fulfilling allotted intelligence tasks allocated to them.

The financial proceeds of operations conducted by such corporations were consequently the property of the corporations and thus of their shareholders, a legal fact of life which has never been, and cannot be, disputed. This was not a good idea because almost all US intelligence
operatives are liars and do not function on the basis of the Rule of Law at all, if they can help it.

Lee Wanta is the well-known patriotic exception to this rule: he operates solely in accordance with US law, in contrast to the behaviour of other US operatives, which is why the kakistocracy* needed to remove him from the scene, as duly occurred July 1993.

Once Wanta had been illegally arrested (contrary to international law, as a diplomat) and then thrown into a stinking Swiss jail on 7th July 1993, the criminal cadres inside the US official structures immediately ransacked Mr Wanta’s bank accounts according to plan.

The history of this matter is, and has been, elaborated in great depth on Christopher Story‘s website www.worldreports.org. and has been extensively published, as mentioned, in International Currency Review and other World Reports Limited intelligence publications.

Students are advised perhaps to begin with the ‘Wisconsingate’ report dated 6th August 2007, which forensically dissects, with detailed documentary back-up, the Wisconsin Department of Revenue’s tax fabrication operation against Wanta, stretching back for over 20 years, that has been exposed by Christopher Story in minute detail, and which formed the fabricated basis for Wanta’s illegal takedown in 1993, despite the fact that Wisconsin has no jurisdiction beyond its borders.

The overall Wantagate crisis, which is the sole and continuing underlying cause of the prevailing global financial and economic day of reckoning that the world is now facing, has been triggered by the fact that the George W. Bush Jr. White House, aided and abetted by other senior office-holders, hijacked the compromise financial settlement of $4.5 trillion that the White House itself agreed (in a classified accord that was finalised in May 2006) should be paid over to Ambassador Wanta, so that the stolen and diverted remaining $23 trillion of his funds (and the many hundreds of trillions of dollars hypothecated upon them) could be released from a de facto lien arising from the collapse of the CIA’s lie that Wanta was dead.

For clearly, since he had ceased to be dead, 100% of these funds (plus the hundreds of trillions of fiat ‘funny’ money generated by illegal leveraged operations from that base) belonged to Lee Wanta and to no-one else: a situation that the banks ‘could not handle’.

The entire narrative of what has become the worst financial corruption crisis in world history (which this stub consisting of disinformation attempts to obfuscate) is set out in great detail on Christopher Story‘s website www.worldreports.org., to which all readers are directed in order for the accurate state of affairs to be understood. As indicated, this stub below is a travesty and a disgrace, as it regurgitates long since discredited CIA lies, presents a diversionary, distorted and misleading picture, and because it malevolently incorporates Christopher Story as a source for some of this disinformation.

It is a disgusting instance of ignorant and malevolent US counterintelligence disinformation and deceit at its very worst.

All the statements in the above commentary may be verified by reference to www.worldreports.org and International Currency Review. Another publication covering this matter in detail is Economic Intelligence Review, also published by World Reports Limited, London. Wanta students should access the Archive on the www.worldreports.org Home Page.

A book devoted to Ambassador Wanta and the Wantagate crisis is in preparation

The Wanta disinformation referred to above has been deleted from this page. ENDS.

DIPLOMATIC STATUS OF THE PRINCIPALS
The Ambassador and his colleagues now have special diplomatic status (conferred upon them by HM The Queen in 2007), which means that the Ambassador is now an Ambassador several times over. This factor greatly complicates the intended discrediting offensive that the mad US stupidity community’s Dark Forces contemplate, their sole objective being of course to cover up their own criminality, in line with pending ‘thought crime’ legislation which has the same Nazi-style objective.

*Note: ‘Kakistocracy’: Governance by a clique representing the worst elements of society, from the Greek, kakos, meaning foul, or filthy.

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier Wantagate reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

STALLING FOR TIME WITH THE SAME OLD INTEL LIES

DR GOEBBELS JOINS LUCIFER AT THE WHITE HOUSE BALL

Thursday 29 November 2007 12:19

SEE NEW UPDATES APPENDED IMMEDIATELY BELOW, ABOVE THE MAIN TEXT…

DEAFENING CHORUS OF ‘WANTA SIGNED TODAY IN NEW YORK’ FABRICATIONS

EVERY TALL STORY UNDER THE SUN IS TROTTED OUT TO BUY MORE TIME

A ‘GAG (OBSTRUCTION) ORDER’ IS THE LATEST RABBIT TO BE PULLED OUT OF THE BAG

SPLUTTERING, SNIVELLING SPOOKS SPIEL, SPIN AND SPEW STUPID STORIES

‘OH, YOU DON’T NEED THOSE WARRANTS. WANTA HAS SIGNED/BEEN PAID’

• LEE WANTA DISINFORMATION INSERTED INTO WIKIPEDIA [WICKED PEDIA, WICCA PEDIA]:
A U.S. INTELLIGENCE DISINFORMATION POST ON 12TH NOVEMBER WAS COUNTERED BY THE
EDITOR OF THIS SERVICE ON 19TH NOVEMBER. THE EDITOR’S STATEMENT OF THE TRUTH WAS THEN DELETED BUT HAS BEEN RESTORED OVERNIGHT 29/30 NOVEMBER. THE EDITOR’S TEXT, REFUTING THE LIES POSTED BY MALEVOLENT U.S. SPOOKS ON WICKED PEDIA, ARE APPENDED AT THE FOOT OF THIS REPORT, WHICH IS DEVOTED PRIMARILY TO THE WICKED DISINFORMATION OFFENSIVE PERPETRATED IN REAL TIME AGAINST AMBASSADOR WANTA BY THESE TERRIFIED CRIMINALS, WORKERS OF DARKNESS WHO HAVE NOTHING BETTER TO DO.

• The legal section at the foot of this report was found on Friday 30th November to have been illegally ‘snipped’ at the important subhead that reads: Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance. All subsequent legal text and notes had been removed, but have now been restored.
FACT: These terrified criminals are extremely stupid, which is why it is appropriate to describe the US intelligence community as the US STUPIDITY community. By ‘snipping’ this text, these fools
thereby reveal what is concerning them. Have they only just woken up to the hazards they face?

Er, what was it that was going on earlier in November? Remember when Paulson was found at Citibank on a Saturday over a holiday weekend, and it was found that the $4.5 trillion had been moved into a fictitious account with Morgan Stanley for onward conveyance to a third corrupt institution? Was that not a case of THEFT BY DECEPTION AND FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE?
Of course it was. Now you know why they ‘snipped’ the relevant legal text below. Odd, isn’t it?

• FURTHER ILLEGAL ‘SNIP’: On Saturday 1st December 2007, this report was found to have been further ‘snipped’ at point (5) below. The significance of this is explained in the subsequent post.

• NEWS UPDATE: George Godfather Bush Sr. is understood to have had his passport removed. A source consulted through an intermediary stated on 29th November that he is ‘wounded in action’. Draw your own conclusions. Cheney? He ‘checked into hospital’, as we dutifully reported, on 26th November, ostensibly with an irregular heart beat. (That makes little sense, as he has no heart, but when such deception operatives need cover and are in a bind they cannot escape from, checking into hospital is their preferred choice). What he usually does, apparently, is check in through the front door, with a view to exiting out the back door and catching a cab (which he has actually done several times already). We understand that he may be attempting/may have attempted, to flee the country (given his access to false passport production services, that MIGHT JUST be possible, but it seems unlikely). Robert Rubin? His whereabouts remain uncertain. Clinton (the male version)? Passport removed. He’s strutting the country ostensibly supporting Hillary Rodinski, but not really. The last thing he wants is THAT WOMAN to become President of the United States, as he would then wind up being even more vulnerable than he is in any case, given Wantagate (if he survives that long, by the way, which is fanciful). As for the Numero Uno, we shall just have to wait and see: probably not much longer, but given the extraordinary double-mindedness of the entire Washington area environment, nothing is certain until it’s HAPPENED. Stay tuned.

• THE GORDON BROWN SITUATION: On Friday the 30th, The Daily Telegraph displayed a huge photograph on its front page of Gordon Brown looking sallow, sick and WITH HIS EYES CLOSED. This is absolutely unprecedented. Is this man bipolar and is he on his ‘medication’, or are they cruelly feeding him a placebo? Seriously. Or is there some dreadful hidden secret that has him trapped? Question: Could the visible, high-speed disintegration of his Government possibly by any chance be connected with the events that are unfolding and will be unfolding in Washington DC?

‘But thus saith the Lord, Even the captives of the mighty shall be taken away, and the prey of the terrible shall be delivered: for I will contend with him that contendeth with thee, and I will save thy children’. Isaiah, Chapter 49, verse 25.

For background, please see the last FOUR OR FIVE Wantagate reports: Archive

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for ‘Wantagate’ reports since April 2006. [Note: A new panel giving details of our latest publications as they are made available, has been added].

• Please Make a Donation to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing financial global corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial corruption and global financial crisis in history. This website has been calling the shots, because of the hijacking of Wanta’s Settlement.

• The Editor is extremely grateful to the generous Americans and others who have so thoughtfully contributed funds to assist us with these exposures. He has now written to everyone around the world who had contributed by 27th November 2007, to thank them for their generosity.

• Emails addressed to us which lack coordinates identifying the sender will be trashed unread. The Editor publishes all his coordinates, as has always been the case, as he has nothing to hide. Others should do the same. Also, we trash any emails unread that are not ‘on message’.

• It would be appreciated if webmasters would refrain from lifting our material without proper adequate attribution. Manifestly, the material may be used with attribution, but any other use is illegal and unethical. We also protest at people picking at our original research and posted reports, and crediting themselves rather than the Editor/this website.

Such behaviour is particularly prevalent in the United States, where lies are a way of life with some people, and is an example of the kind of dishonesty that we are exposing in these reports.

A GOOD EVIL DAY FOR THE U.S. OFFICIAL DISINFORMATION APPARAT
Wednesday 28th November was another good evil day for the White House, as well as being a satisfactorily evil one for the US intelligence (STUPIDITY) community’s liars and disinformation specialists. With one accord, they believe, with Dr Josef Goebbels, that if a lie is repeated often enough, it will be believed and can then substitute for fact.

A review of these ‘Wednesday lies’ will provide us all with a timely reminder of the slipperiness of the skin of the serpent. Specifically:

• The CIA-linked ‘carousel’ banks successfully pumped up the stock market with stolen money, enabling gullible investors to assume that ‘the worst is over’, ‘there’s not going to be a slump’, Christmas is coming, the ‘sub-prime’ crisis is ‘toast’, and variations on these themes to suit.
[Note: The Editor will explain in a future report just what REALLY underlies ‘sub-prime’ crisis. The word ‘sub-prime’ has become what spooks call a ‘slide’ – a pre-packaged bundle of mis- and dis-information sanitised for ignorant public consumption].

• The CIA’s disinformation hacks successfully disseminated variations on the theme that Ambassador Wanta had received a letter/had gone to the bank/had signed documentation/had signed a gag order, or any of the above.

WHITE HOUSE/INTEL LIES PROCESSED ON 28TH NOVEMBER
Among the outright lies and distortions that ‘crossed the Editor’s desk’ during the day in London, were the following:

(1) A high-level French intelligence source informed an intermediary that ‘the American group’, meaning Ambassador Wanta and his diplomatic colleagues, had signed a Government ‘hold-harmless’ agreement.

(2) Ambassador Wanta and his colleagues would be signing their agreement at Citibank, in Midtown Manhattan, in the afternoon of Wednesday, 28th November. The Editor’s contact was ‘given a time for the signing but was asked not to divulge it until the time had elapsed’.

(3) Separately, a high-level US intelligence source told a contact that Ambassador Wanta DID sign a Government document on Wednesday and should be signing with Citibank later on Wednesday, too. The Editor’s contact ‘could not elaborate because he/she was under a strict gag order’.

(4) A ‘gag order’ was applied at 2.00pm on 27th November. No indication of WHO imposed it, natch.

((5) ‘Certain folks were upset with ‘your’ Michael Cottrell as he was making certain demands in a way that was not appreciated’. [Note: On 1st December, it was found that the rest of this report had been ‘snipped’ here. We explain the significance of this in the subsequent report].

EXPOSURE OF WEDNESDAY’S BATCH OF OLD LIES
With respect to the first lie above (1), note that the source was a French intelligence agent. This source is either collaborating with the US disinformation specialists, or else has fallen flat-footed for their lies. Either way, this implies that French intelligence, which we thought was a cut above the rest, is not as proficient as advertised.

In respect of lie (2), the Ambassador remained some 1,500 miles from New York, as has been the case since the Ambassador and Mr Cottrell left New York on 21st November, so he could not sign with Citibank, New York at any time on 28th November.

Neither did Ambassador Wanta receive any letter or ‘agreement’ with Citibank. The hush-hush subsidiary lie about a specific ‘time of signing’ was presumably intended to buttress the deception with a suggestion of content, whereas the entire assertion was content-free. By the way, after the ‘time had elapsed’, the ‘time of signing’ was never divulged, either!

The high-level US intelligence source (3) lied brazenly to the Editor’s distinguished contact and should be appropriately reprimanded for so doing: but that is up to him. Who are we to suggest that these evil, brainwashed people should be told off for spreading lies like confetti? Neither they nor their sponsors can tell the difference between right and wrong, so why should they be equipped to discern what are lies and what is the truth? As for the feckless statement that the source ‘could not elaborate because he/she was under a strict gag order’, the use of the phrase ‘gag order’ in this context is typically duplicitous. The correct phrase should be ‘obstruction order’.

FOR ‘GAG ORDER’ READ ‘OBSTRUCTION ORDER’
Thus the statement that ‘a gag order was applied at 2.00pm on 27th November’ is a lie because any such order (handed down by WHO, precisely?) should read ‘obstruction order’. By which we mean of course that these criminals and their disinformation and confusion specialists are engaged in further obstruction of truth and justice. [A correspondent emailed the Editor on 28th November listing further Federal criminal charges that he correctly urges should be added to our standard list, appended as usual below, such as: obstruction of justice, collusion, conspiracy, interference with official investigations, insurrection, sedition, rebellion, treason, grand theft, intimidation, fleeing from the scene of a crime, coercion, and dereliction of official duties*].

As for (5) ‘Certain folks were upset with ‘your’ Michael Cottrell as he was making certain demands in a way that was not appreciated’. That’s odd, because no-one of relevance spoke to Mr Cottrell all day. That being the case, it’s difficult to understand how ‘certain folks’ could have known about any ‘demands’ that Mr Cottrell is alleged to have made during 27th-28th November, since he made none, unless he was talking to himself (which is not his style). You cannot make demands into thin air: or rather, if you shout demands into thin air from your back yard, maybe someone will hear you, but probably not 700 miles away in Langley or New York.

THE TRUTH AND THE SIMPLE FACTS
So let’s turn this Luciferian poppycock onto its head and recite the simple facts of the matter:

1. Neither the Ambassador nor Mr Cottrell had received any written or verbal communication from ANYONE by the time this update had to be prepared from 12.30am onwards UK time (overnight 28/29 November).

2. No famous letter or other documentation had been received from Citibank, the Government, or Father Christmas at either location.

3. Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., is not under any ‘gag order’ and neither is the Ambassador. Mr Cottrell briefed the Editor for this report, and the Editor spoke with the Ambassador late last night without any impediment whatsoever.

On the other hand:

4. The White House had gained time by instructing its compliant ‘intelligence’ deception apparat to disseminate these lies, even recruiting foreign intelligence resources to do its dirty work as well.

5. By spewing out more old lies about a ‘gag order’, with no specificity and no definition of terms, the vague idea has been promulgated that alles is ‘in ordnung’ and under control, eliding into the easy assumption that, therefore, the foregoing lies are all true.

Indeed, the Editor, who speaks to the Principals every day, even has several of these deluded people INSISTING that, irrespective of what the Editor may write, what THEY say is true, so that, therefore, what this Editor says ‘must’ be false. Incredible, but true.

Welcome to the Banquo, Dr Goebbels.

6. It was ever so convenient that these brazen lies all took hold simultaneously because, guess what? The warrants that had been reported yesterday as having been prepared to procure further necessary arrests were, you got it, impeded at the highest level.

• And why on earth would that be? Because:

7. Those concerned were told ‘Oh, you won’t be needing these, because ‘they’ve been paid’. Wanta signed today’. Have we by ANY chance heard any of this before?

8. ‘Lee Wanta is the Principal and even though Michael Cottrell is acting in his capacity, only LW has the full rights as Principal’. So, it would thus appear that the source of this imaginary fabrication is intimately familiar with the relevant AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., documents.

But the FACTS, rather than the make-believe, of the matter are as follows:
(1) Ambassador Wanta signs initial relevant paperwork;
(2) In accordance with corporate resolutions, both the Ambassador and Mr Cottrell THEN sign corporate documents jointly, without which no funds can be moved.

The suggestion that Mr Cottrell has nothing to do with the matter is ignorant rubbish, a figment of someone’s untamed imagination, and indicative of the propensity that these people have of poking their noses impertinently into the business of others.

THE PRINCIPALS’ POSITION MADE CRYSTAL CLEAR IN WRITING
The Editor has not had sight of correspondence sent by the Principals on 18th November to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Pentagon, the Department of Justice, the State Department, the relevant Foreign Ministers, and other interested parties; but it is believed that it spelt out in stark terms what needed to be done in order for this crisis to be resolved (and a global calamity to be averted).

‘WANTA SIGNED’/WAS PAID LIES BUY WHITE HOUSE MORE TIME
President George W. Son of Godfather Bush Jr.: this Editor has studied you in depth and can read you. He can also read and see right through the lies and permutations of lies that your terrified deception apparat pours out like champagne at a devils’ dinner party, as it seeks ways to extricate itself from this calamity of its own making. The Editor can deconstruct what’s going through your mind. And he is ever so sorry, but this variation on your standard theme – that Ambassador Wanta has ‘signed’ and/or ‘has been paid’ – has passed its sell-by date.

The irony that you appear not to appreciate is that by pressing the button marked ‘gag order’ when there is no gag order, you are destroying any residual ‘value’ that an actual ‘gag order’ might have for you (in terms of digging you out of the miry pit into which you have jumped, with your criminal associates). The Editor completed a conversation with Mr Cottrell a few hours ago, indicating that there is no gag (obstruction) order whatsoever. But…

‘GAG ORDER’ WILL BE GREEN LIGHT TO ESCALATE OFFICIAL LIES
When Mr Cottrell has signed an official document (were one to be forthcoming), all of a sudden, he will be unable to provide the Editor of this service with ‘backwards information’, a fact of which the Editor will immediately be made aware, so that the fact will be openly reported on this website. Mr Cottrell and the Ambassador will be talking to the Editor about future matters which have nothing to do with the past and with ‘intelligence’, but will be unable to discuss or clarify issues concerning the worst financial corruption crisis in world history.

This will, however, not be a problem, for the reason explained in the preceding report: because of the intransigence of the US authorities in hijacking Ambassador Wanta’s $4.5 trillion in June 2006 and thereafter, a mass of information about this millennial corruption offensive, and how it was organised and originated, has spilt right open and into the public domain, been captured by our observers and is stored in the Editor’s files. Several issues of International Currency Review and other publications that we produce have elaborated on Wantagate, and have been distributed around the world.

A book which will reveal everything on this crisis that the Editor knows, is in preparation. All of which illuminates, does it not, what ‘gag’ really means in this context. It means ‘obstruction’ – covering up, brushing under the carpet, etc, for expedience purposes. And here’s why.

For, bingo! As soon as Mr Cottrell has signed whatever tawdry piece of felonious gagging paper the corrupt US authorities may wish him to sign, even though such a document may be illegal and subject to subsequent litigation, THE LIES CAN START OVER!!!

‘OBSTRUCTION ORDER’ WILL GREATLY FACILITATE DIRTY WORK
Oh yes! Once Mr Cottrell has signed along the dotted line (if he chooses to do so, which will be his decision of course), the filthy US disinformation apparat can get back to its dirty work, and start all over again. For all we know, the CIA may revert to its old lie that Mr Wanta is ‘dead’. Why ‘waste’ a lie that served these criminal cadres so ‘well’ in the past?

As reported in the preceding commentary, the Editor was told by one of these cells earlier this week that ‘Mr Cottrell is a liar’. So, thanks for the heads-up!

We KNOW that as soon as the ‘obstruction order’ kicks in, these rats will turn up their lie amplifier full blast. All the old lies about the Ambassador will probably be trotted out, as well (as is already happening), even though he ceased to be dead in July 2005 – thereby, shall we say, causing the ‘train-wreck’ that has ensued. (The Editor’s forthcoming Wantagate book will of course address these lies and will demolish them to smithereens).

But this time round, we have the benefit of the very large volume of detailed information about Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta and Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., that we have had to publicise on this website and in our publications – plus the add-on that should any of these despicable US intel liars and disinformation specialists so much as to imply that the Editor of this service is a liar, as was obliquely suggested by the self-discredited disinformation cell alluded to above, the Editor will take appropriate steps to sue such people for libel in the English Court. He will also cease to be polite, and will identify these liars by name (something he has avoided doing to date because we have necessarily been concentrating on the Ambassador’s business, not on our own).

CONGRESSIONAL FIGURES GETTING OUT AHEAD OF INDICTMENTS
The news that Trent Lott and that Hastert fellow are getting out of the Legislative Branch before the end of their terms highlights the following abomination. If elected Representatives orUS Senators pack it in BEFORE they are indicted, they get to keep their colossal pensions. If they are indicted while still in the Legislature, they lose their colossal pensions. And rats are deserting the White House faster than they can nibble through an Executive Branch doornail, you may have noticed.

The same stench of corruption and decay can be smelt from where the Editor is sitting here in Westminster, where our Sub-Prime Minister is sinking into a sludge of sleaze the like of which would have been welcomed with a sigh of relief by the corrupt John Major Government. There is a sense of Downing Street failure, pointlessness, deadness, spiritual emptiness, squandered military power, and disillusionment in Whitehall, as yet another bunch of these self-destructing opinionated Illuminati dead-beats winds up contemplating the political scrap-heap.

Although the late British politician Enoch Powell prophesied accurately that all political careers end in disaster, he left the scale of such disasters to the imagination. That’s because his eyes had not been opened so that he could foresee the depth of the pitch Blackness of the Workers of Darkness who have gained temporary ascendancy in our day, and are so keep to drag us all down with them to the pit, so they won’t be so lonely down there.

UNCONFIRMED DEVELOPMENTS REPORTED TO US
Having dealt with Wednesday’s crop of regurgitated old lies and disinformation, we can profitably end with the following UNCONFIRMED information. Please agree that by labelling what follows as UNCONFIRMED, the Editor is signalling that these data may need to be corrected or updated, later. The information, being derived from sources normally considered by the Editor to be reliable, may be subject to correction, and therefore cannot be characterised as disinformation (just in case such a malevolent thought were by any chance to enter the minds of any of those criticised above). Anyway, we are advised as follows:

• US demands were made to Abu Dhabi for stolen funds to be returned. The Abu Dhabi party holding the funds illegally replied that they were ‘comfortable’ retaining the funds, and would not comply. The US (enforcement) party then elaborated: ‘Very well, you can carry it away on camels’, which, being interpreted, meant the following: ‘If you don’t disgorge the stolen funds, your wire service will be disconnected, as will all your other US-supplied facilities and you’ll be back in the Seventh Century where you belong’.

• The following US Money Centre banks are reportedly to be subject to audits going back for at least ten years: Citibank, Bank of America, Bank of New York Mellon, Wachovia, JP Morgan Chase, and their predecessors. The big securities houses will be audited likewise.

• Every bank that has transferred funds without written authority is to be subject to audit backwards for at least ten years.

• The true owners of the ORIGINAL funds only, will have their stolen money restored to them.
On receipt of their funds, they will pay tax to the Treasury. The retrieved funds will not go to the Treasury, but to the original owners of the funds.

• In answer to a question prompted by the Editor, a source queried on the Editor’s behalf by an intermediary gave an interesting reply. The question was: ‘What happened to Godfather Bush Sr.?’ (after he was caught trying to steal $4.5 trillion: see the preceding report).

The answer: ‘I know, but I cannot tell you’.

• The Chinese authorities and parties have withdrawn all their funds from Citibank. The reason for this is thought to be that they will not do any business with this criminal enterprise until (a) it has taken its overdue enema and (b) Ambassador Wanta has been paid. Once the Ambassador has been paid, his power to ensure that this CIA institution behaves properly will have been enhanced (not least given the Ambassador’s immense latent powers), since the Principals have undertaken to leave $100 billion with the bank, and the institution has agreed to pay them $352 billion extra by way of interest due under Article 4A-305 of the Universal Commercial Code (‘Liability for Late or Improper Execution or Failure to Execute Payment Order’) via the previously referenced 60-day avail. The agreed amount was based upon this Editor’s rough calculations that the interest owed many weeks ago approximated $350 billion for the 16 months of Citibank’s criminal refusal to remit the Ambassador his funds, augmented by $2.0 billion so that the figure looks ‘different’ from th Editor’s. On the basis of the same rough calculation, the figure should be revised to around $380 billion (given the subsequent delays); while of course had the Editor performed a banking sector calculation using overnight interest rates, the amount payable would be of the order of between $1.0 and $2.0 trillion extra.

• Finally, there is a RUMOUR (note that we clearly LABEL data as either UNCONFIRMED or in this case, as RUMOUR, where this is necessary to distinguish what follows here from multiple-sourced FACTS) that US prisons are being emptied of residents who can be deported, e.g. back to Mexico, to make room for the new intake of long-term financial corruption prisoners who will be filling up the jails as a direct consequence of the unravelling of the biggest financial corruption crisis in world history, not least via the several federal investigations now under way. (It is assumed, but is unconfirmed, that the system of justice applied will be military justice).

‘LET’S BRUSH IT ALL UNDER A HUGE FILTHY CARPET, SHALL WE?’
Even so, the prevailing sense is that the ‘brush it under the carpet’ instinct has the upper hand, notwithstanding that the several massive Federal investigations are have been initiated AND CANNOT THEREFORE BE STOPPED, not even by this Government; while several Grand Juries are hard at work, with the New York Grand Jury taking evidence this week from impeccable sources whose detailed information on the financial corruption that Wantagate has exposed, is of unrivalled premium quality.

Once the Ambassador and Michael C. Cottrell have signed the documents that the Government evidently wants them to sign (and the disinformation apparat are clamouring for them to sign as well, so that their new old lies can take root), even though no American can be placed legally under duress to sign documents designed to cover up felonies (and therefore to obstruct justice, which is what is intended), the immediate practical outcome will be that neither of the Principals will be able to confirm or deny anything.

As indicated above, this will give the corrupt disinformation specialists the green light to renew their Wanta lie campaign, with impunity. And that, of course, is what is intended.

• They won’t get away with it, but they will try; as indicated, it has already been stated to this Editor that Mr Cottrell is a liar, which is a lie. the Editor knows him well and has worked closely with him for a long time now, with complete satisfaction and confidence.

BUSINESS AS USUAL: THE CROOKS ARE STILL AT IT
Meanwhile, it is STILL business as usual. As far as we can see, the crooks are STILL stealing money. Since we are dealing with Luciferian double-mindedness, yesterday’s definitive undertaking (for instance, ‘a letter is on the way to the Ambassador from Citibank’) becomes tomorrow’s discredited disinformation. Notwithstanding various false blandishments to the effect that a letter had been despatched, nothing arrived at either of the Principals’ addresses on 28th November, as usual. Therefore, all those who swallowed the White House’s ‘Wednesday lies’ look like village idiots.

Since most of these people are supposedly ‘intelligence’ operatives, it is very evident that the word ‘intelligence’ is a misnomer. It is not intelligent to tell lies, because lies, like plutonium, have a half-life, and tend to decay. Layered lies can well be compared (appropriately enough in this upside-down geomasonic environment) to an inverted pyramid, which balances precariously upon a single point. As new lies are piled upon old, the structure becomes ever more unstable, and has to be propped up by a network of scaffolding in order to prevent the inverted pyramid from collapsing.

PRECARIOUS INVERTED PYRAMID OF LIES IS ABOUT TO IMPLODE
The stage reached ’as we speak’ is that not only is the pyramid of egregious Wantagate old lies dangerously unstable, but the surrounding scaffolding of scurrilous disinformation is about to crash to the ground, taking the US banking system and the dollar with it. And the stock market, awash with recycled stolen money, looks just great.

Come the first of December, the new dollar banking system, under which every cent will be taxed and everything will have to be done on the books, will enter into effect (according to received wisdom: but, through the looking glass, we must remind ourselves that this is a contradiction in terms). At least, the 160 representatives of foreign payee powers (still languishing in-country, we are told), expect the new banking system to start up on that date.

Gee, if Ambassador Wanta hasn’t been paid by the commencement of the new US banking system, the stalling tactics and ‘obstruction orders’ deployed by the cynical, lying US stupidity community on Wednesday 28th November, will appear, in retrospect, to have represented rather more than yet another display of terminal Luciferian folly. November 2007 will appear to have been a golden age by comparison.

* This excellent correspondent went on to advise:

‘On the premise that all elements of this incredible state of affairs are true and correct as you have diligently reported, the 160 nations [sic] should come together and file an official complaint in the World Court and the US Courts against all perpetrators in both their official and their personal capacities, demanding full restitution and punishment for the crimes committed.

Further, this event should be brought forward, under mandate of court order, to be revealed to the general public by all forms of public media, under threat of contempt charges if not so done. Also, all those involved, no matter what level they occupy in government or the private sector, should be immediately arrested and held in contempt and for treason and high crimes against the United States and the world community. By now, there should be enough evidence, pending the Grand Jury results, to issue the required warrants and obtain the said orders’.

And there should, if the relevant reports of the overcrowded jails being emptied of deportees are to be believed, soon be plenty of room in the vast American GULAG to receive all these people. Then they may begin to understand what it feels like having as one’s primary preoccupation for each day, reduced to trying to get to the prison library for a few moments of peace and quiet without being assaulted along the way.

Oh, and facing 22 years in prison with no prospect of parole. The only saving grace will be that these people will not have been incarcerated for 22 years, as originally intended, by evil US officials bearing false witness, which is what happened to Ambassador Wanta.

This, to conclude, reminds us that a considerable number of Americans are languishing in jail on the basis of false witness in similar circumstances, having had their assets stolen by these odious criminals. The Editor is in receipt of evidence on this score from a number of sources, implying that in some respects, the United States today really IS ‘worse than Nazi Germany’, as an Irish friend knowledgeable about these matters, puts it.

LEGAL SECTION:
PEOPLE OUGHT TO READ THIS INFORMATION, AS IT INDICATES THE DEPTH OF THE DEPRAVITY THAT WANTAGATE HAS EXPOSED. CONSTANT REPETITION OF THIS BASIC DATA IS STILL NECESSARY…

• We now repeat, yet again, our familiar summary of the Statutes, securities regulations and fraud information that we have appended to these reports for many months. The reason we append this information is to remind everyone of their clear responsibilities under the US Misprision of Felony legislation, and of course to provide a legal basis for these reports.

LEGAL RECAPITULATION FROM REPORT DATED 30TH AUGUST 2007:
Reiteration of the fraudulent transactions involving Bank of New York Mellon – a bank so arrogant and conspicuously indifferent both to its tarnished reputation and to its grotesque breaches of US law and of N.A.S.D./S.E.C. Regulations, that it now takes first prize in the crowded competition for the title of ‘Most arrogant and corrupt financial institution in America’. At least, this was the case until the perpetration of the ‘Saturday scam’ described above and on 13th November:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scienter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• ‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON IS IN BREACH AND OF WHICH THE SIX ‘LEVY BANKS’ MAY LIKEWISE BE VARIOUSLY IN BREACH [CREDIT SUISSE, UBS, DEUTSCHE BANK, BANK OF AMERICA, CITIBANK, THE BANK OF ENGLAND]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is in violation of:
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR SIR LEO WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT THE HIGHEST U.S. LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006, AND HAVE CONTINUED THEIR SERIAL CRIMES EVER SINCE:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war

This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Wanta’s funds.

The Directors and others listed in Part 1 of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and others posted on 11th June may likewise be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious violation of the laws itemised above. This list is reproduced in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, September 2007, on pages 163-168.

U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: MISPRISION OF FELONY:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier Wantagate reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

IS PROVOST MARSHAL COVERING UP 9/11 COMPLICITY?

ANOTHER OFFICIAL PROMISE TO PAY – ON SATURDAY – IS BROKEN

Sunday 18 November 2007 18:05

EVERYBODY IS NOW TOTALLY DISGUSTED WITH THE PROVOST MARSHAL

U.S. OFFICIAL ‘PROMISES TO PAY’ SHOWN YET AGAIN TO BE EMPTY AND DUPLICITOUS

THE PRESIDENT AND HIS CRONIES HAVE BEEN STEALING CORPORATE TAX DOLLARS

PROMISE TO PAY ON SATURDAY WAS ANOTHER WORTHLESS RUSE TO BUY MORE TIME

FUND MOVEMENTS ARE BEING TRACKED BY INSLAW PROMIS SOFTWARE (WSHDC.Ops)

HOW WANTAGATE CAN BE CONNECTED DIRECTLY TO THE 9/11 MASS MURDERS

MISSING WANTA TAXES WILL TRIGGER ‘SMOKING GUN’ CONGRESSIONAL AUDITS

CONGRESSIONAL AUDITS WILL EXPOSE THE MASS OFFICIAL FINANCIAL THEFTS

THE OFFICIAL FINANCIAL THEFTS BECAME MASS FINANCIAL RAPE AFTER 9/11

THEREFORE WANTAGATE PROSPECTIVELY OPENS UP 9/11 OFFICIAL COMPLICITY

BUT THE ALTERNATIVE, NOT PAYING, WILL BE FAR NASTIER STILL FOR EVERYONE, INCLUDING THE HIGH-LEVEL CRIMINAL OPERATIVES, THE PROVOST MARSHAL AND THE AMERICAN BANKSTERS WHO ARE STALLING FOR TIME AND COVERING UP THEIR CRIMES.

BOTH U.S. POLITICAL PARTIES ARE IMPLICATED AND WANT TO PREVENT THE 9/11 DAM BURSTING. BUT MATTERS ARE NOW OUT OF THEIR HANDS AND HAVE RUN OUT OF THEIR CONTROL. THE ONLY WAY OUT, TO STOP ALL THIS, IS TO PAY WANTA HIS DIVERTED $4.5 TRILLION IMMEDIATELY AND TO CEASE PLAYING THESE CRIMINAL GAMES.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for ‘Wantagate’ reports since April 2006. [Note: A new panel giving details of our latest publications as they are made available, has been added].

• Please Make a Donation to help fund Christopher Story‘s ongoing financial corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial corruption and global financial crisis in history. This website has been calling the shots, because of the hijacking of Wanta’s Settlement.

• The Editor is extremely grateful to the generous Americans and others who have so kindly contributed funds to assist us with these exposures. He intends to communicate personally with everyone who has contributed, on his return to the United Kingdom.

• Emails addressed to us which lack coordinates identifying the sender will be trashed unread. The Editor publishes all his coordinates, as has always been the case, as he has nothing to hide. Others should do the same.

• It would be appreciated if webmasters would refrain from lifting our material without proper adequate attribution. Manifestly, the material may be used with attribution, but any other use is illegal and unethical. We also protest at people picking at our original research and posted reports, and crediting themselves rather than the Editor/this website.

Such behaviour is particularly prevalent in the United States, where lies are a way of life with some people, and is an example of the kind of dishonesty that we are exposing in these reports.

PROVOST MARSHAL ENGAGED IN A ‘BAIT AND SWITCH’ OPERATION
The Provost Marshal General is cynically using Ambassador Lee Wanta and Michael C. Cottrell M.S. as bait. He is engaged in deception, like his master, Vice President Richard B. Cheney.

• He is, typically, performing one part of his task and not the other. His dual tasks are as follows:

1. To make the Wanta payment immediately in accordance with his oath and his responsibilities under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). He has failed to do this and is therefore in breach of his responsibilities and of his oath. Transferring Wanta’s funds takes 20 seconds.

2. To arrest and bring to military justice all US bankers, securities house officials, lawyers, intelligence intermediaries, legislators, justices and political figures who are impeding the course of justice and are implicated in the financial frauds that Wantagate has exposed and continues to expose. And to send as many of them to face foreign justice as can be despatched, in accordance with the location of the financial crimes they have committed (see recent reports).

Yesterday we let it be known that we will press ahead with publishing what follows, which reveals how Wantagate may engulf the Bush II Government in an orgy of investigations into complicity in the 9/11 mass murders. We held back this report out of courtesy, and of course, as usual, the Provost Marshal et al have taken advantage of the Ambassador’s wish to be helpful. They always do. Any concession to these thieves and maniacs is taken as a sign of weakness.

JOHNSON IS DOING ONLY 50% OF HIS JOB. THIS IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH.
He is failing to perform Task Number One, contrary to his oath as a commissioned officer and his UCMJ responsibilities.

He is reportedly performing in respect of Task Number Two, but he is using his alleged performance in respect of Task Number Two, to mask the fact that he is failing to perform in respect of Task Number One.

IN APPARENT DERELICTION OF HIS DUTY. FORMAL CHARGES MAY NEED TO BE FILED.
His failure to complete Task Number One means that he is in dereliction of his duty and that the US Army Chief of Staff must immediately file formal charges against General Rodney L. Johnson given his contravention of his oath as a commissioned officer.

That is the opinion of military legal sources we have consulted.

Many of the staff of the US Joint Chiefs were attending a social event on Saturday 17th November, where the matter of filing formal charges against this Provost Marshal was raised for discussion. An American military source with whom we are in contact via intermediaries advises us that, since the Joint Chiefs of Staff follow our postings very closely, they know about the suggestion that has been put forward for formal charges to be brought against the Provost Marshal, who may already be subject to appropriate belated pressure for him to comply with his duties under the UCMJ and with his oath as a commissioned officer. UPDATE: The Editor has just (at 7.50pm UK time, Sunday), received CONFIRMATION that measures against the Provost Marshal were indeed discussed.

The same source confirms our report that a large number of US ‘special forces’ have been called up for a stateside mission.

When we conveyed this information by telephone to a US party, the transatlantic connection was severed twice. That is why this information has been added here.

And since 160 delegates from foreign payee countries are still stuck in their New York hotels and diplomatic residences awaiting their payments, again illustrating the central point that this is an INTERNATIONAL crisis, which is why this Editor is involved, this criminality crisis is now on the verge of engulfing the whole world.

REACTION TO OUR PREVIOUS REPORT WITHIN ABOUT 45 MINUTES
Within approximately 45 minutes of us posting the report dated 15th November, the Principals were informed that the Provost Marshal General is ‘doing his job’, while further anger was expressed at our latest report.

The Provost Marshal is NOT doing his job. He MAY BE doing HALF his job, but that does not mean that he is doing his job.

On the contrary, by delaying and so far mishandling the Wanta remittance, the General is in clear and continuing dereliction of his official duty and of his oath as a commissioned officer and has been taking instructions from the criminal, thieving Vice President of the United States, as has been separately confirmed by US Treasury compliance and DOD Internal Affairs.

This is FACT, not fiction.

Separately, with reference to certain observations that we had to include in the preceding posting specifically in the context of the direct threat made against the Editor of this service, our comments were included for a certain purpose and immediately yielded the indications that we sought when posting the remarks.

It is a fact, whether palatable to some or not, that no-one would be receiving a single red cent were it not for Wantagate, whatever the preceding 15 or 20 years’ unpleasant experiences that certain people may have suffered at the hands of the most ruthless financial criminals in world history. A further explanation of why this is so was appended here as an Update to the preceding Wantagate report and is added at the foot of this new report, for reference.

• The $35,000 scarce private funds that the Editor of this service had to forward in order to facilitate the circumstance which triggered these cascading, horrifying events, was immediately diverted and misallocated by the corrupt Wisconsin Department of Revenue, as proxy for the stinking lack of integrity which bedevils the US State and Federal structures from top to bottom.

• It is also a fact of record that despite the Editor having advised Judge James L. Martin of the relevant Wisconsin Court by letter in October under the terms of the Misprision of Felony Statute that the ‘Wisconsingate’ scandal needs the most thorough investigation, no reply to this letter (written in response to the Judge’s two-page non-committal letter to this Editor of last July) has been received. That this grievous matter WILL be dealt with in appropriate manner is a certainty [see report dated 6th August 2007].

As can be imagined, to undertake this extremely unpleasant work pro bono publico at considerable financial loss and then to be excoriated by several payees for doing what not a single American did, or was allowed to do, hardly qualifies the Editor for the torrent of sudden verbal abuse to which he has been subjected. Happily, our now massive email traffic is overwhelmingly supportive so that any such messages included among it can be set aside for the time being, for follow-up later.

THE LATEST RECORDED FINANCIAL DIVERSION OF WANTA’S FUNDS
During the evening/night of 14th-15th November, JPMorganChase/Morgan Stanley were ‘down’ for six hours. That means that there was a ‘black hole’ at dead of night – which is when these people steal money – and that something altogether untoward was happening.

It is believed that the funds belonging to Ambassador Wanta may have been transferred overnight from Citibank via Morgan Stanley to the institution controlled by a criminal organisation called the Central Intelligence Agency, namely Bank of America – or that some other combination of corrupt US institutions and transfers took place.

At midnight UK time on 15th November, the precise whereabouts of the funds belonging to the Ambassador were unknown to this service. At 4.55pm on Friday 16th November, it was separately confirmed to this service that the Wanta funds had again been stolen or diverted, (although their whereabouts were reportedly known as of the afternoon (UK time) on Saturday 17th).

This is why Mr Cottrell briefed the Editor an hour or so earlier to the effect that the Principals were being told nothing, no-one was revealing anything and there was a ‘cone of silence’. Such a ‘cone of silence’ typically descends upon the wretched scene whenever the US criminal institutions and their dirty official co-conspirators have something particularly filthy to hide.

On Saturday 17th November, the Principals were told that they would be paid that day. Period. They were not paid on Saturday.

Which, all things considered, would mean, would it not, that the Provost Marshal General appeared to be covering up these latest criminal diversions or thefts. That can certainly be inferred from the fact that he had throughout rudely refrained from updating the Ambassador and his colleague on the status of his long overdue and hijacked payment, and on the whereabouts of his funds.

These should have been paid on a stand-alone basis in June 2006 and should never have had any connection or linkage with other payable amounts, claims or allegations going back for 20 years or more, which are nothing to do with the Ambassador. [See the Update appended to our report dated 16th November, which, as indicated, is added at the foot of this report].

It was therefore agreed between the Principals and the Editor that if the present article has to be published, we are entitled to assume that the Provost Marshal General, far from now fulfilling his responsibilities, is indeed – as we openly anticipated – presiding over the biggest ongoing financial scandal in world history, while (in typical two-faced fashion) APPEARING to be doing his job – the familiar stance of double-mindedness to which previous reference has been made.

It takes just 20 seconds to transfer Wanta’s funds to his corporate securities account, not a month.

SO IT’S CRIMINAL BUSINESS AND MASS BRIBERY AS USUAL
It is understood that the usual mass bribery, orchestrated in the past by Vice President Cheney using stolen and generated fiat money, is STILL occurring, with children’s trust funds being set up and anonymous donations being made out of nowhere to targeted parties, in order to try to prevent them ‘talking’. At the same time, given the mass arrests that have taken place, the spouses and family members of many of those who have ‘disappeared’, have reportedly been turning up at police departments asking for information about their ‘loved ones’. The police are anecdotally reported to be informing such people that the banker or lawyer concerned has been arrested for serious offences but that he’s in good health.

Apparently this is the standard formula that has been adopted. AND YET, the people at the top, and the American criminal enterprise financial institutions, are STILL reportedly stealing and diverting Ambassador Wanta’s funds. Two weeks ago, 161 money laundering cases were thrown out by a Judge in Las Vegas. The highest-level criminals are, it seems, perfectly relaxed about lower-level co-conspirators being rounded up and facing 25 years to life in jail, while they themselves continue to rape and pillage the United States’ financial economy with what they may assume to be impunity, because of the apparent complicity and weakness of this Provost Marshal.

FATUOUS AND IRRELEVANT EXPLANATIONS FOR THE DELAYS
Meanwhile the Provost Marshal’s endless delays in making the Wanta payment are being fatuously explained inter alia on the basis that he ‘has been arresting bankers etc’.

• This is controlled disinformation, as is the lie that ‘the Provost Marshal is ‘doing a great job’.

The arrest activity has nothing to do with anything. Brigadier General Johnson can go on arresting bankers, or purporting to arrest bankers, until next Christmas or until the end of the solar system – AFTER he has procured the $4.5 trillion payment.

There is nothing to stop Johnson continuing to arrest bankers and lawyers until the end of the 21st century. It has NOTHING to do with making the Wanta payment.

As indicated, remitting Wanta’s funds takes 20 seconds maximum, not a month.

ARCH CRIMINALIST PAULSON REITERATES THAT ‘WANTA WILL NEVER BE PAID’
On 15th November, Henry M. Paulson ‘screamed’ in some context or other that Ambassador Lee Wanta will never be paid. He lost his cool completely.

OPERATIVES AND CRIMINALS WHO ARE ‘PROTECTING’ PAULSON
Last week or more recently, Paulson reportedly deposed before Attorneys that he is ‘protected’ by three people: Dr Alan Greenspan, the world’s most prolific financial thief and criminal; Dr Bernard Bernanke, his successor as Chairman of the US Federal Reserve Board, whose institution has a hidden derivatives-related shortfall of an estimated $1,400 trillion; and Robert Rubin, the Clinton aide who was installed as Chairman of Citibank specifically (we must assume) to torpedo the Wanta payment and to keep this crisis going (so these madmen may believe) until such time as the corrupt CIA operative Mrs Hillary Rodinski Clinton is elected (with or without the assistance of the usual Third World-style ballot-rigging) as President of the United States.

With Hillary Rodinski in the diving seat, the intention is that the cover-up of 9/11 and the ensuing mass financial rape of the United States by these financial criminal operatives can continue for another eight years, while the murderous, criminal ‘Box Gang’-linked operatives headed by Mrs Clinton herself ‘whack’ everyone standing in their way. In other words, there has been no change in the Master Plan to continue the financial corruption.

CHENEY CONTINUES ALLEGEDLY TO STUFF FUNDS INTO ABU DHABI
Meanwhile Cheney is reportedly continuing to stuff stolen assets into Abu Dhabi – as opposed to Dubai, where Mrs Laura Bush has been stuffing George Bush Jr.’s stolen assets: it wouldn’t do for these two US criminal rivals, who have been stealing each other’s funds like rats in a sack, to operate in the same United Arab Emirates location: might cause friction, might it not?

EAVESDROPPERS SITTING IN ROOMS ABOVE THE PRINCIPALS
In the hotel where the Ambassador and his Executive Vice President and Treasurer, Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., are residing in the New York area, a bunch of antagonistic US intelligence goons is operating from the rooms situated immediately above them, listening to every word they utter. They have been in the routine sordid habit recently of interrupting communications, including transatlantic telephone conversations.

Separately, although the hotel in question is located in New York State, French intelligence have informed the Ambassador that a New Jersey-based Special Agent is in charge of their detail. How very curious. What are its intentions? It is often the case that a second team of spooks is drafted in to oversee the operations of the first team, just to make sure that they do their sneaky job.

Additionally, crude attempts are being made to split the Ambassador from Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., and his closest associates, because the criminals regard the Ambassador as a ‘softer touch’ and cannot stand Michael Cottrell because he insists upon rigorous compliance with all aspects of the abused Rule of Law. Furthermore, whenever representatives of the criminal classes try to ‘work on’ Mr Cottrell, he reads them the relevant Statutes and Regulations, and gives them a piece of his acerbic and astute mind: and they don’t like it.

They are very gravely mistaken as, having recently spent two Sundays with both gentlemen, and knowing both of them extremely well in any case, the Editor knows that they both speak the same language and are joined at the hip like Siamese twins. This attempt to ‘split’ the team that is tripping the globalist financial crooks up (because they allowed this crisis to develop) is not going to work. The clumsy threat uttered against this Editor last week (see the report dated 15th November) had the same foolish and counterproductive purpose.

In recent days, a close associate of the Ambassador was also ‘screamed at’ by Bank of America personnel, no doubt because bankers at that corrupt institution are being arrested. That is not the Ambassador’s problem: it is that corrupt CIA bank’s own problem, because, like Citibank, it has been behaving like a criminal enterprise (as our reports have long since demonstrated).

HOW WANTAGATE LEADS BACK TO, AND WILL EXPOSE, 9/11
Now what REALLY lies behind the delays affecting the diverted Wanta payment?

Here’s what: IT CONNECTS TO 9/11. It would NOT have connected to 9/11 had these fools paid Wanta his agreed-upon Settlement funds of $4.5 trillion in June 2006, so that he could get on with his life and his massive intended welfare projects, and refinance the US Treasury and therefore both the US and world economies on-the-books – as had been intended. No-one would have been much the wiser and this Editor would have been hung out to dry (of course).

Let us explain how this connection is liable to unravel because of the crooks’ stupidity and greed:

• Payment to the US Treasury of the windfall $1.575 initial tax payment (which the Provost Marshal, Paulson, Bush Jr., Bush Sr., Bernanke, Rubin, Cheney et al are unlawfully preventing) cannot fail to trigger Congressional audits of the financial services subcommittees in charge of watching over the corrupt US banking sector and of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service. Audits would then become unavoidable for several interrelated reasons:

(1) Taxes that are claimed to have been paid by corporations into the Treasury since 9/11 have disappeared, having never been credited in the first place. Instead, they have been diverted, stolen, and used for collateral and hypothecation purposes (just like Ambassador Wanta’s $4.5 trillion). In other words, the criminal cadres have been stealing tax accruals, as well as Wanta’s funds, for their own benefit.

(2) THIS IS A CAPITAL CRIME BEYOND ANY CAPITAL CRIME IMAGINABLE: THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND HIS CORRUPT CRONIES HAVE BEEN STEALING CORPORATE TAX DOLLARS FOR THE PURPOSES OF THEIR OWN PERSONAL SELF-ENRICHMENT. AND THE PROVOST MARSHAL MAY BE COVERING UP THIS CRIMINALITY ALONG WITH EVERYTHING ELSE THAT HE IS COVERING UP.

(3) As previously explained, US taxpayers have been subsidising the rampant financial rent that the corrupt holders of high office have been activating as they steal both US corporate tax dollars and also withhold the Wanta payment, so that tax rates have stayed higher than they need have been.

• THE AMERICAN PEOPLE’S TAX PAYMENTS HAVE BEEN SUBSIDISING THE OFFICIAL CROOKS’ THIEVERY. THIS IS THE CAPITAL CRIME WITHIN THE CAPITAL CRIME OF THE MILLENNIUM. THE OFFICIAL CRIMINALS HAVE BEEN STEALING TAXPAYERS’ TAX DOLLARS.

(4) Imagine, therefore, the impact that the initial windfall $1.575 trillion will have, in terms of raising innumerable Congressional audit questions. For instance, the US Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT), originally introduced in order to compel a few rich people to pay more tax, now encompasses an estimated 20 million people. Congress is talking about raising this impost in order to generate $50 billion more in tax. That will cease to be necessary after the Wanta payment; but it will then become clear that the AMT accruals were never credited in the first place.

(5) All sorts of investigations will thus be triggered in respect of corporate and other tax accruals that should have been credited and haven’t been, as this giga-scandal unravels: in other words, what has been happening inside the corrupt Wisconsin Department of Revenue (and no doubt in other US States) is replicated on a gargantuan scale at Federal tax level.

(6) The arrival of the $1.575 trillion will raise huge questions concerning what has happened to the remaining $23 trillion held in Wanta’s illegally hijacked bank accounts (not to mention the hundreds of trillions hypothecated on the back of those Wanta funds). Banks that have stolen Wanta’s funds in order to stay afloat will be exposed as criminal enterprises all round the world. The process will also reveal forgery by criminal CIA operatives and others of bank documents (copies of which this Editor holds), related illicit pay orders benefiting criminal intelligence operatives, and the outright stealing of Ambassador Lee Wanta’s financial assets – as in the case of the Lloyds Bank, Aylesbury, accounts held for Wanta’s corporations which the Editor found in April 2006 had been shifted into the personal name of the US lawyer Jan Morton Heger.

(7) The 9/11 ‘Reichstag Fire’ abomination provided the criminal cadres with the cover that they desperately needed, by now, behind which to maximise perpetration of the financial fraud crimes which had become a way of life under Bush Sr. and the Clintons (Hillary Rodinski called the shots when Clinton was in the Oval Office). It follows generally that audits that will follow the payment of Wanta’s initial $1.575 trillion into the Treasury, thereby transforming the Treasury’s finances, could lead to the progressive unpeeling of the entire onion of criminality, exposing the financial (and therefore the murderous) dimensions of 9/11, such as the destruction of derivatives contracts and Brady bond portfolios held inter alia at the Twin Towers offices of Cantor Fitzgerald, which lost 658 people in the satanic 9/11 conflagration. The contracts were thereafter all ‘forgiven’.

• In summary, such audits would cause the entire army of filthy financial corruption worms to come tumbling out of the can, and would have the potential for taking down the entire US Government – including of course elements of the hyper-corrupt legislative Branch itself. THIS MAY BE WHAT THE PROVOST MARSHAL IS TRYING TO PREVENT HAPPENING, IN WHICH CASE HE HAS, AS PREVIOUSLY ASSERTED, BECOME A CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATOR HIMSELF.

• Why would all this be liable to occur?

• Because the audits would BRING TO LIGHT ALL THE MONEY, INCLUDING THE STOLEN CORPORATE TAX ACCRUALS, THAT HAS NOT BEEN AVAILABLE TO THE TREASURY SINCE 9/11, WHEN THE GIGA-THEFTS OF THE FUNDS WERE KICK-STARTED BY THIS CRIMINALISED AMERICAN NAZI GOVERNMENT WHICH IS HOLDING THE ENTIRE WORLD TO RANSOM.

• The interaction of the tax scams with the ransacking of Ambassador Lee Wanta’s funds, in all its myriad dimensions, would begin to gush forth like a corrupt, putrid sewer into the public domain, notwithstanding that the so-called ‘mainstream’ media has been largely bought off with stolen fiat money bribery funds and ordered by criminal cadres not to cover Wantagate.

• In other words, it is now apparent that payment of Wanta’s $1.575 trillion in tax might lead to the unravelling of complicity in the mass murder atrocities believed to have been accommodated by the US Government itself against its own people on 9/11.

• ON THE OTHER HAND, if the criminal co-conspirators continue to refrain from making the Wanta payment (and its administratively linked remittances to the Tier 1-10 recipients), THE DOMESTIC AND GLOBAL OUTCOME IS GOING TO BE EVEN WORSE, because not only will MASSIVE ongoing exposures of these hideous US financial crimes continue to escalate and to reverberate around the world, but the imminent collapse or contraction of financial institutions worldwide as the financial criminality is exposed (as is currently happening) will SNOWBALL: and God help humanity.

• As HM The Queen told the G-8 Meeting in Germany last June, the Wanta payment needs to be made ‘for the good of the whole of humanity’. THAT IS TRUER NOW THAN EVER.

Thus failure to pay the Wanta Settlement of $4.5 trillion and the $1.575 trillion initial tax payment will CERTAINLY drive the international and domestic financial system and economies into the calamity zone foreseen in our report dated 2nd September 2006, and elaborated here last summer, with horrendous ‘unforeseen consequences’. Lee Wanta’s funds are the only ‘on-the-books’ real cash around. They are continuing to be criminally exploited, as has been the case since June 2006.

• Anyone reading the ‘mainstream’ press today on both sides of the Atlantic can see, unless they are sitting on their brains, how dreadful the day of reckoning is liable to be. It all connects back to the 9/11 atrocity, as we always understood.

THEREFORE, THE HIGH-LEVEL CRIMINALS FACE A CHOICE OF MELTDOWNS
In short, these financial criminals face a catastrophic meltdown either way:

• The meltdown they fear most is what will emerge from Congressional audits (which would be performed by one of the best investigative entities in Washington, the US Government Accounting (Accountability) Office, and probably also by the excellent Congressional Research Service. Such audits will progressively implicate each and every one of the top criminals (whether still holding high office or not) – because they have, since 9/11, been scamming the US taxpayer and financial economy to the tune of hundreds of trillions of dollars, behind the Black cover provided by the orchestrated ‘War on Terror’, with its pre-prepared ‘anti-terrorism’ and surveillance legislation.

These are both cynical devices to prevent the American public and the world becoming aware of the extent to which these criminals have been ransacking and raping the American dollar financial economy. Britain has caught this evil bug, too, presumably because the British financial criminality perpetrated inside the casino called the City of London needs to be covered up, too.

*Note: The eavesdropping and heightened Big Brother ‘security’ imposed immediately following 9/11, has this single secret purpose: to provide ‘the centre’ with streamed information on what the people know about the thefts and the ongoing scamming operations being perpetrated by these crooks. The paranoia that the Editor of this service encountered between 2002 and 2006 among a certain class of US operatives reflected their anxiety at the implications for them or their families personally of the financial crimes that are being exposed now by Wantagate.

We have massive evidence of this.

• Therefore, the meltdown that the top criminal financial operatives prefer, is the global financial and economic meltdown, with (they wrongly assume) ‘less’ danger of imminent US Congressional audits of the financial services committees which would reveal the proportions of the rape of the US financial economy, let alone (so they believe) the proportions of their illegally accrued, untaxed, stolen funds in Dubai and Abu Dhabi, where they assume their stolen assets cannot be touched.

• That is nonsense, since every single US dollar transaction is traceable – and in their cases, has been and continues to be, traced by Inslaw PROMIS software (WSHDC.Ops).

HOWEVER, the official criminals and their bankster associates are precluded from NOT making the Wanta Settlement payment (triggering the administratively linked Tier 1-10 settlements and the country payments) by the immense international pressure that they themselves have permitted to arise consequent upon their failure to remit Wanta’s Settlement on a stand-alone basis in June 2006, after which the US Treasury’s finances could by now have been transformed.

At the G-8 Meeting held in Germany last June, The Wanta Plan was again endorsed; and the world’s central banks, which have been picking up the tab while the criminal cadres have been financially raping the US financial economy, have long since indicated that they can take no more of this strain (notwithstanding corruption within the Bundesbank, the Bank of England, the Central Bank of Iraq (controlled by the White House) and the Federal Reserve).

The 160 representatives of the payee countries waiting at their hotels and diplomatic residences in New York have indicated that if they were to be forced to return home empty-handed, sanctions will be applied to the United States both collectively and unilaterally, trade warfare will erupt, exchange controls may need to be imposed, and gross, disorderly conditions across the financial markets will escalate and become the norm.

A number of large financial institutions will go to the wall, with the Too Big To Fail (TBTF) concept abandoned. In other words, if the corrupt orchestrators of these financial abominations do not make the Wanta payment, life is going to become much nastier than the kleptocracy may believe.

OBJECTIVE: SPINNING THIS OUT TO 2009 ‘AT ANY COST’
Even so, the Master Plan has called for the crisis to be kept ‘low-key’ – an intention ‘blown’ by our reports – until the intended controlled abusive political switchover into the hands of fellow criminal CIA operative Hillary Rodinski in 2009.

No wonder the arch-criminal Paulson is ‘screaming’ that Ambassador Wanta will never get paid – which of course means that none of the other parties would ever get paid, either, if he has his corrupt way. For if Mr Wanta gets paid, the initial $1.575 windfall tax gets paid ONTO the Treasury’s books, triggering the sequence of events that might bring the Bush Administration to its knees – or, if it has left office, its highest-level officials to justice (now ostensibly military justice).

If the payment had been made when it should have been made in June 2006, the lid could have been screwed down on the financial corruption cauldron, and on the 9/11 abomination, for years. And this Editor would have been left dangling, with no support system. But the perpetrators were much too greedy. So the game plan has been to spin this out for as long as possible, AT ANY COST.

Which means they don’t care what the costs of defiance will be, so long as their own hides and corrupt interests are not affected.

They failed to understand that they would meet determined resistance. That was NEVER anticipated, and they STILL can’t understand how it has happened.

• An intermediary sent our report dated 15th November to a certain criminal party in the Northeast of the United States. He returned the email marked: l.o.l. (a.k.a. laughing out loud). Which indicates supreme arrogance, a belief that he is ‘protected’ by the underworld’s Dark Forces, or both of the above. This is the kind of criminal mentality we are having to confront. It brooks no opposition.

IS THE PROVOST MARSHAL COVERING UP THE 9/11 ABOMINATION?
If the Provost Marshal General is COVERING UP THE 9/11 ATROCITY AND THE MURDER OF 3,000+ PEOPLE, he should immediately be charged by the Army Chief of Staff under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). This should happen anyway, for the reasons alluded to above.

The Army Chief and the Joint Chiefs have the authority and the ability to file such a charge.

Another, critical, reason for such a filing would be that American troops have been dying in Iraq and Afghanistan because they don’t have the right equipment because the criminals have stolen funds non-stop since 9/11, just as they stole the Katrina money.

(British troops are in the same boat. Today, the head of the British Army, General Sir Richard Dannatt, Chief of the General Staff, accused the Ministry of Defence of exactly the same criminal negligence towards British troops as applies in the US context).

• And by the way, Ambassador Wanta has a project, which is being stalled by this unprecedented US financial corruption scandal, to finance the aborted New Orleans refurbishment operations that were supposed to have been financed by the Katrina government funds that the US official and Bushite associated criminals have, as usual, brazenly stolen.

‘BAIT AND SWITCH’ OPERATION AGAINST THE PRINCIPALS
The reality is that the Provost Marshal General appears to have been playing the usual sterile intelligence ‘bait and switch’ game with the Ambassador and Mr Cottrell – keeping them holed up in a hotel with crude eavesdroppers located in the rooms above them and a ‘security detail’ headed by a New Jersey Special Agent, watching their every move, and listening to everything they say.

We know for a fact that the briefing which forms the basis of this update was intercepted in real time. Because there was an almost immediate reaction.

PERHAPS THEY REALLY WILL PAY THE ULTIMATE PENALTY
So: Wantagate connects up with, and is in the process of threatening to expose, every single one of these treasonous high-level US war criminals, not least for their de facto complicity in at least allowing the 9/11 mass murder abomination to occur (but since the buildings were blown up, it was far worse than that, as is explained in the Editor’s book The New Underworld Order).

And any such exposure will, in turn, implicate the corrupt British Government led by Blair and Brown in consequential atrocities, not least the 7/7 ‘terrorist’ bombings which troubled British intelligence sources (several of them) have demonstrated to us were likewise orchestrated with UK official connivance and MI5 assistance.

THE WAY THINGS ARE GOING, THEY COULD FACE BEING HANGED
So, do you know what? For the first time, we are beginning to believe that these US Nazi financial criminals and alleged mass murderers could REALLY end up being shot against a wall, or hanged. Given the absolutely unprecedented enormity of their crimes, this is now beginning to look at least like a distinct eventual possibility.

If they had paid Wanta’s $4.5 trillion Settlement funds when they should have done, in June 2006, instead of Paulson hijacking the money, they would probably have ‘got away’ with accommodating the 9/11 ‘Reichstag Fire’ mass murder AND the stealing of multiple trillions of tax and other dollars from the American people. It is still possible, but less and less likely by the day, that the criminal holders of the highest offices will be allowed to remain in place to the end of their terms, as though nothing had happened, but with their accounts frozen and real power remaining in the hands of the Provost Marshal or whoever supersedes him.

• And it is now clearly no longer beyond the bounds of possibility that if it transpires that the Provost Marshal is himself assisting in the cover-up of these monumental crimes, he too will face the consequences outlined above. Given the history of this matter, it should have been ASSUMED from the outset that the Provost Marshal will have been brought onto the scene NOT to facilitate the overdue resolution of this matter, but to facilitate the ongoing cover-up. And so it has proved.

Either way, the outlook for these arch financial criminals is bleak. Their only wise course of action at this latest of all stages, is to pay Wanta immediately, with no further broken promises, as again occurred on Saturday, so that the whole world can take a breather.

Since the Editor of this service has always made it clear that he wishes to do nothing that would hinder the healing process, he would probably be amenable, post-payment, to curbing future analyses (which will continue to have global ramifications); but clearly this option cannot even be contemplated while the Provost Marshal General appears to be aiding and abetting the continued exploitation and the illegal hijacking of Ambassador Lee Wanta’s $4.5 trillion agreed-upon private transaction Settlement by the most ruthless bunch of criminals in the history of the world.

• THE FOLLOWING UPDATE WAS APPENDED TO THE PRECEDING REPORT
ON 17TH NOVEMBER, CONCERNING AN ATTACK MADE ON THE EDITOR:

The Editor has correctly asserted that if it had not been for Wantagate, no-one would be paid a single red cent. This statement is not false, self-serving or arrogant: IT IS ACCURATE. The reason it is ACCURATE is that the George Bush Sr.-Greenspan ‘NEVER-PAY’ model was constructed in such a diabolically interleaved manner (designed to preclude payouts) that it has always been possible for payments to be torpedoed by means of a single interference at any level or point in the interlinked chain of payments, so that the entire spectrum of payments is aborted. The allegation that the Lee Wanta situation has ‘blocked’ the other payments is an inversion of the facts.

The difference to the situation imposed by the necessity of making the Wanta Settlement is the same point that we have made all along, namely that when Lee Wanta ceased to be dead [see e.g. report dated 6th August 2007], following this Editor’s intervention, it became necessary for unique reasons for his compromise stand-alone payment to be made (even though it was later hijacked by Paulson, in June 2006): whereupon we had to begin pressing for payment in these reports. Had it not been for this and huge related pressures, the Bush Sr.-Greenspan model would have remained intact, as these criminals never had any intention of fulfilling ANY of their financial obligations.

But because of the massive international backing for The Wanta Plan, and because the criminalists MADE THE SERIOUS MISTAKE OF HIJACKING WANTA’S FUNDS AND TRYING TO INCORPORATE HIS NECESSARY (STAND-ALONE) COMPROMISE PAYMENT INTO THE BUSH SR.-GREENSPAN ‘NEVER-PAY’ SCAMMING MODEL, they destabilised their own impregnable arrangements designed to preclude payment EVER, with the consequences that have unfolded since June 2006.

THEREFORE our statement is NOT self-serving, arrogant puffery, but rather a correct and accurate statement of FACT. We are aware of the identity of the individual who appended the disinformation, unscrambled above, to the report in question. As for whoever obtained what information, when and why, this is childish and irrelevant. The fact that others have suffered for years attempting to get these criminals to deliver on their promises and undertakings, is a harsh reality which attracts the sympathy of everyone, but has nothing whatsoever to do with the Wantagate issues in question.

Concerning the lie that The Queen was involved in certain nefarious financial activities, this is a REVERSAL OF THE TRUTH. HM The Queen was DECEIVED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES, and is A VICTIM OF THEIR EVIL INTENTIONS AND PRACTICES. Her Majesty The Queen was further victimised when they stole her gold on 29-30 March 2007 (which has since been retrieved, with the massive illegal fiat accruals being, we are led to believe, substantially paid for HM’s account).

So THE LONG-RUNNING QUEEN LIE, beloved of certain US disinformation specialists without a cause, is hereby NAILED, as well.

Further, some people were surprised at the Editor’s rather harsh reaction to being threatened (see below). Why ? During the Second World War, the people of London were subjected to horrendous bombardment and the response was the same. A sharp riposte is appropriate in the face of bullying and malevolent threats. Finally, as of late on Friday evening London time, we had prepared, as had been made widely known, a report linking Wantagate directly to the 9/11 mass murders, which the criminal cadres have all along been collectively seeking to cover up. This was ready to be posted; but (although the Editor operates on an unpaid, arms’-length basis) publication of this report has not yet been authorised. That can be interpreted, for the time being, as somewhat encouraging. [18th November: However the officially encouraged promise of payment turned out to be yet another duplicitous ruse to buy more time].

LEGAL SECTION: PEOPLE OUGHT TO READ THIS CRUCIAL INFORMATION
AS IT INDICATES THE DEPTH OF THE DEPRAVITY THAT WANTAGATE HAS EXPOSED.
OUR CONSTANT REPETITION OF THIS INFORMATION IS EVIDENTLY STILL NECESSARY…

• We now repeat, yet again, our familiar summary of the Statutes, securities regulations and fraud information that we have appended to these reports for many months. The reason we append this information is to remind everyone of their clear responsibilities under the US Misprision of Felony legislation, and of course to provide a legal basis for these reports.

LEGAL RECAPITULATION FROM OUR REPORT DATED 30TH AUGUST 2007:
Reiteration of the fraudulent transactions involving Bank of New York Mellon – a bank so arrogant and conspicuously indifferent both to its tarnished reputation and to its grotesque breaches of US law and of N.A.S.D./S.E.C. Regulations, that it now takes first prize in the crowded competition for the title of ‘Most arrogant and corrupt financial institution in America’. At least, this was the case until the perpetration of the ‘Saturday scam’ described above and on 13th November:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scienter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• ‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON IS IN BREACH AND OF WHICH THE SIX ‘LEVY BANKS’ MAY LIKEWISE BE VARIOUSLY IN BREACH [CREDIT SUISSE, UBS, DEUTSCHE BANK, BANK OF AMERICA, CITIBANK, THE BANK OF ENGLAND]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is in violation of:
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR SIR LEO WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT THE HIGHEST U.S. LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006, AND HAVE CONTINUED THEIR SERIAL CRIMES EVER SINCE:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war

This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Wanta’s funds.

The Directors and others listed in Part 1 of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and others posted on 11th June may likewise be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious violation of the laws itemised above. This list is reproduced in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, September 2007, on pages 163-168.

U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: MISPRISION OF FELONY:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier Wantagate reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

HOW WANTAGATE TRIGGERED THE ‘SUB-PRIME’ CRISIS

U.S. CAUGHT MARKETING UNBACKED TRASH TO THE REST OF THE WORLD

Thursday 30 August 2007 23:28

GIGA-SCAMS ORCHESTRATED BY THE BUSH II WHITE HOUSE

GREAT AMERICAN MORTGAGE ECONOMIC SCAM [= G A M E S]

MOST CORRUPT U.S. ADMINISTRATION IN AMERICAN HISTORY

THESIS: THE UNSTABLE, CORRUPT STATUS QUO. ANTITHESIS: THE STABILISING WANTA PLAN

IMPORTANT NOTICE: THIS REPORT WAS ‘SNIPPED’ OVERNIGHT FROM JUST BELOW THE PARAGRAPH HEADED: ‘UNBACKED U.S. TRASH PAPER SOLD TO FOREIGNERS’, TO THE END OF THE REPORT. THIS INDICATES THAT WHAT WE ARE REPORTING HERE IS ACCURATE (WHICH WE KNOW TO BE TRUE). IT IS ILLEGAL TO ATTACK A FOREIGN WEBSITE.

THE ‘SNIPPED’ TEXT HAS BEEN RESTORED [AS OF 8.30 AM EDT, FRIDAY 31ST AUGUST 2007].

INTERRUPTION: URGENT UPDATE: 2.00PM EDT, 31ST AUGUST:

LETTER TO PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH JR. FROM AMBASSADOR LEE/LEO EMIL WANTA:

The Editor has been asked to display the following letter that Ambassador Wanta has just sent [31st August 2007] to President George Bush Jr., Members of the US President’s Cabinet, all Wanta Plan Administrators and others for their immediate attention:

• Bear in mind that President George Bush Jr. FORMALLY agreed to the $4.5 trillion Wanta Settlement in May 2006. He is responsible for fulfilling this undertaking in the interests of the American people and, per Her Majesty The Queen: ‘for the good of the whole of humanity’:

US President and Commander in Chief, George W. Bush Jr., Bush Administration Cabinet Members, Members of Congress, Wanta Plan Administrators et al:

IF US President George W. Bush Jr. is operating under the “Rule of Law” which is absolutely shattered “by others”…

(a) WHERE is the full cooperation with FULL DISCLOSURE on tracing the Financial Settlement of US Dollars 4.5 trillion – which includes USD 1.575 ‘set-aside allocation’ for my personal/repatriation tax payment – from our US Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, et al to the authorized TreasuryDirect payment to Morgan Stanley [NYC]/ AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. securities account?

(b) WHERE is my notification that the lawful payment is actually being remitted AGAIN, has really been credited AGAIN, and actually delivered with the ECONOMIC RECEIPT to the above-mentioned securities account?

(c) WHERE is my public and/or private written assurance that the United States of America’s President and Commander in Chief has commanded and directed full cooperation by Treasury Secretary Hank M. Paulson, Jr., Deputy Treasury Secretary Robert Kimmitt, FedRes Chairman Ben Bernanke, FedRes Vice Chairman Donald L Kohn, Bank of America, JPMorganChase, Wachovia Bank, Bank of New York-Mellon Corporation, Citibank, N.A., and Morgan Stanley Securities to again implement any and all lawful necessary steps and/or procedures to expedite the said immediate, but previously delayed “by others”, cash funds payment to the above-mentioned securities account within Morgan Stanley [NYC]?

(d) WHERE are the White House concerns about the “set-aside allocation” for the civil payment of US Dollars 1.575 trillion to our United States Department of the Treasury – on behalf of the American people – as [the President] is really THEIR President and Commander in Chief, with full Executive Authority over our Great Nation’s Departments/Agencies?

The basic concepts and fundamental principles of Our American Republic now stand as the only legitimate considerations going forward, for they have been tested almost to annihilation already, and will not endure much longer if we continue on this path.

But there is no American Republic without the Rule of Law – no rights, no protections, no United States Constitution: there is absolutely nothing; and if ‘they’ continue to destroy the Rule of Law, they destroy the idea that is America itself.

Nothing quite like The Wanta Plan has ever before been attempted in America, and if we are allowed to succeed, there will be national excitement and opportunities – which [will] define America, and the Bush Administration.

“As nightfall does not come at once, neither does oppression. In both instances, there’s a twilight where everything remains seemingly unchanged, and it is in such twilight that we must be aware of change in the air, however slight, lest we become unwitting victims of the darkness” – US Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas.

Cordially yours,

AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.

[signed]
Lee Emil Wanta, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Dated: 31 August 2007

The report first posted late on 30th August, hacked and ‘snipped’ by NSA overnight, now follows:

HOW WANTAGATE TRIGGERED THE GLOBAL ‘SUB-PRIME’ CRISIS

U.S. CAUGHT MARKETING UNBACKED TRASH TO THE REST OF THE WORLD

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for ‘Wantagate’ reports since April 2006. [Note: A new panel giving details of our latest publications as they are made available, has been added].

THE EDITOR HAS BEEN TRAVELLING IN THE UNITED STATES
Although it may appear to some observers that Wantagate has stalled, the increasingly dangerous brinkmanship between the two dialectical ‘opposites’ – continuation of the unsustainable, corrupt status quo on the one hand, and the agreed long-term solution to the deep problems of the United States and the whole world, The Wanta Plan, on the other – continues. But before we examine and expose what has been happening, some important preliminaries need to be addressed.

To begin with, the Editor has been travelling in the United States, and during this period he had considered it appropriate to re-post the ‘Wisconsingate’ report originally posted on 6th August, given the critical importance of the corruption detail contained therein. During his absence from London, the Editor has received an unprecedented number of emails and telephone calls asking whether he is Okay, dead, or incapacitated. We thank all who have sent such messages, and hereby assure them that the Editor is in good shape and accordingly, so far, alive.

In the event of his sudden death, he will advise in a separate posting from wherever he may be.

DONNA SHALALA SPONSORED LEO WANTA’S DETENTION
It was President Clinton’s Cabinet associate, Donna Shalala, originally from Wisconsin, who arranged for the illegal detention of Ambassador Leo Wanta in a mental institution, because he pleaded that he had paid the (illegal) civil tax assessment of $14,129 twice, which the officials concerned chose to think represented a sign of madness.

As our ‘Fourth Reading’ of the Wisconsin Tax Gestapo fabrications posted on 6th August 2007 makes clear, not only was this amount paid under protest twice in 1992, but the Delinquent Tax Warrant # 44-00162088, which was feloniously duplicated, was certified by the relevant Wisconsin Court as ‘fully satisfied’, and notarised to that effect on 1st June 2003.

In the Wisconsin madhouse, every illegal attempt was made, on the clandestine instructions of the Clinton White House, to have the Ambassador declared insane. Leo Wanta’s life was saved from this Soviet-style fate by Dr Connie Lee, the veteran Chief Psychiatrist for the State of Wisconsin, who refused to certify Leo insane and thus saved his life, after five earlier attempts to have him certified had also failed.

THE FIVE FAILED MURDER ATTEMPTS
These endeavours to have the Ambassador ‘expunged from the record’ were supplemented the five known attempts, likewise orchestrated by the Clinton White House, to have Ambassador Wanta murdered – culminating in the scandalous attack by a Deputy Sheriff, who changed into prisoner’s clothing at the Kettle Moraine, WI, correctional facility, attacked Leo Wanta in the bathroom, failed to murder him, escaped back into the office area, changed back into his Deputy Sheriff’s uniform, and fled in his County Car.

U.S. TREASURY INSTRUMENTS WORTH $18 BILLION STOLEN FROM HIS BRIEFCASE
Meanwhile the 18 high-value US Treasury instruments with a face value of $18 billion were removed from the Ambassador’s diplomatic briefcase, which has never been returned to him with his personal effects because it would have to contain the missing 18 US Treasury certificates.

The suspicion that these were stolen under the direction of former Wisconsin Governor Tommy Thompson at the behest of the criminalised Clinton White House has never been denied.

WISCONSIN STATE COURTS CORRUPTED AND SUBORNED
On top of all this, the legal record shows unequivocally that the Wisconsin judiciary appears to have been systematically suborned to obfuscate matters, so as to prevent Leo Emil Wanta over the years from bringing forward irrefutable evidence of his absolute innocence and his diplomatic status, and subsequently to complain that such evidence later proffered should have been presented at the kangaroo court hearing in 1995, in the first place. To describe what happened as a grotesque and deliberately contrived miscarriage of justice would be equivalent to describing the corrupted and mafia-controlled Wisconsin Department of Revenue as smelling of roses, rather than stinking, as it does, of dead rats. And of course the lawyers supposedly appointed to ‘work for’ Leo Wanta have all along been serving the usual ‘hidden master’ intelligence suspects.

WISCONSIN JUDGE WRITES TO THE EDITOR
In the report posted by the Editor on 7th August, it was stated that no response had been received from either Judge Michael B. Torphy, Jr. (whom we knew had retired), or from Dane County Circuit Court. However, after visiting the Ambassador and Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. in the United States during the week ending 24th August, the Editor found, on arriving in New York on 25th August, the following letter from His Honor Judge James L Martin, Dane County Circuit Court, Branch 17, 215 South Hamilton Street, Madison, WI 53703-3290, dated 3rd July 2007.

The Circuit Court therefore responded quite promptly to the Editor’s letter and enclosures, which conveyed, for the Court’s urgent attention, the detailed information and references itemised in our report dated 7th August 2007 [see Archive]. The Letter from Judge James L Martin reads as follows:

July 3, 2007

Christopher Story FRSA
World Reports Limited
PO Box 1970
New York, NY 10156-1970

Re: State of Wisconsin v. Leo E. Wanta
[Stating the relevant Case Number]

Dear Mr Story

This will acknowledge receipt of your packet of information regarding Leo E. Wanta and payments to the Wisconsin Department of Corrections in 2005. This file has been assigned to Branch 17. Judge Torphy is retired and has been for more than ten (10) years.

Your packet far exceeds information contained within the court file on the subject of payment restitution, payment of victim surcharge and other monetary obligations.

In my conversation with Agent Michelle Riel of the Department of Corrections, she advises that
she paid over to the DOC cashier all monies received in connection with Mr Wanta’s probation supervision. Because Mr Wanta was on probation at the time of discharge, the monies paid to satisfy his obligations did not pass through the Dane County Courts. We have no more knowledge about Department of Revenue Warrants than are contained within your packet of papers.

I suggest that you concentrate your request for information with the Wisconsin Departments of Revenue and Corrections. It appears, however, that the discharge granted by Secretary Frank is indicative that all court ordered financial obligations were paid in full in 2005. If there were other non-court ordered financial obligations unsatisfied with the Department of Revenue, these must be addressed in another forum and with Revenue.

It is evident that you’ve had email contact with the Department of Corrections through John A. Dipko, Public Information Director. It is also clear that you have the address, telephone number and Tax Account Number for Leo E. Wanta. You or Mr Wanta should be able to confirm his payment history and the basis for the April 17, 2007 Notice of Warrant Filing.

Finally, you must resolve your inquiry with those that took in the funds in 2005 and disbursed them to satisfy or partially satisfy Mr Wanta’s outstanding obligations. Further, any questions about outstanding tax warrants should be addressed to the Department of Revenue.

Sincerely,

[Signed]

James L. Martin
Circuit Court Judge

cc. John A. Dipko, Department of Corrections
Michelle Riel, Agent [location stated].

POINTS ARISING FROM THE JUDGE’S LETTER
The following points arising from His Honor’s letter to this Editor, which demonstrates a remarkable talent for ‘professional skating’, may be noted:

• The file containing the Editor’s packet of detailed information having been ‘assigned to Branch 17’, is ‘live’. Otherwise it would not have been so assigned.

• The information sent to the Court materially exceeded the information available to the Court precisely because the Editor, on behalf of Ambassador Wanta, sought to INFORM the Court of the deplorable circumstances surrounding this case, so that the Court may consider whether it would be appropriate in general for it to take such action as it may deem appropriate, and in particular whether the Court should issue the ‘Satisfaction of Restitution’ document that the Editor has been authoritatively informed is necessary and is seeking. The Judge has not offered to provide such a document, despite his statement: ‘It appears… that the discharge granted by Secretary Frank is indicative that all court ordered financial obligations were paid in full in 2005’.

• This is the same stance as that adopted by Attorney Steven Goodwin in email correspondence to the Editor, notwithstanding that the matter is not legally concluded, according to the Editor’s best information, until the Court has issued the necessary ‘satisfaction’ document.

• The Editor’s interest is solely to procure a proper accounting of the use of his loan funds: that’s all. Such an accounting can only be provided by the Court. The statement: ‘It appears… that the discharge granted by Secretary Frank is indicative that all court ordered financial obligations were paid in full in 2005’, is not, we understand, sufficient. That this is the case is manifest from the fact that the Wisconsin Department of Revenue has continued to demand the SAME funds that were paid twice in 1992, certified as ‘fully satisfied’ on 1st June 1993, and then paid a third time using the Editor’s funds in July 2005. Therefore, with respect to His Honor, his statement is mistaken.

Former Wisconsin Secretary Frank’s discharge is indicative of nothing at all so far as the Wisconsin Department of Revenue is concerned, as the Editor’s correspondence with the Department, to be published in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 &2 [September 2007] will make clear.

• Hence, the Honorable Judge’s recommendation that ‘I suggest that you concentrate your request for information with the Wisconsin Departments of Revenue and Corrections’, is circular and quite meaningless. Not only has the Editor done precisely that, but no satisfaction whatsoever has been obtained as a consequence of his extensive efforts which, with the exception of Mr John Dipko’s helpful responses, have yielded zero results.

• There are of course NO ‘non-court ordered financial obligations unsatisfied with the Department of Revenue’. Likewise, we have long since ‘confirmed’ Leo Wanta’s ‘payment history and ‘the basis for the April 17,2007 Notice of Warrant Filing’. There is no such basis.

• The Judge’s final comment that the Editor should ‘resolve your inquiry with those that took in the funds in 2005’ requires that the Editor should ask Attorney Steven Goodwin yet again to procure the necessary ‘satisfaction’ document from the Court, which he has failed to do, relying instead on a statement almost identical to that of the Judge, namely that the ‘Absolute Discharge’ granted by former State Secretary of Corrections Frank, SHOULD provide the necessary evidence that Leo Wanta’s ‘obligations’ have been fully satisfied.

There is no such word as SHOULD in law: while the facts of the matter make it clear that the Wisconsin Department of Revenue, which on the evidence assembled in this case is manifestly a criminal organization, is not in the slightest impressed by what the Department of Corrections does. It carries on dunning innocent non-taxpayers regardless of what other components of the Wisconsin official structures may assert or recommend.

COURT DECLINING TO DO ITS DUTY?
We therefore have here an alarming case of a US State County Circuit Court evidently declining to take ‘appropriate action’ in the light of the irrefutable evidence of multiple tax fraud and fabrication perpetrated over a prolonged period of time NOT by a taxpayer, but by the State taxation authority itself. The Editor has in practice acted in accordance with the US Misprision of Felony law, and the Court proposes to do NOTHING in the face of the damning evidence of the Wisconsin Department of Revenue’s grotesque tax fabrications and prolonged criminal conduct against Leo Wanta?

It is for parties other than this Editor to judge whether this apparently scandalous and criminal state of affairs implies that the Dane County Circuit Court may be a co-conspirator in the covering-up of this monumental miscarriage of justice aggravated by relentless and repeated scams against a non-taxpayer diplomat, perpetrated by the Wisconsin State tax authority.

IRREGULAR PAYMENT TO THE WISCONSIN STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER
There is also the tricky matter of the use of $4,167.64 of this Editor’s funds that was paid by the Wisconsin Department of Corrections on 4th August 2005 to the Wisconsin State Public Defender’s Office [see 6th August report], to defray costs arising due to the illegal use by the prosecuting Wisconsin Department of Revenue of a so-called ‘Public Defender’ who was never appointed by Leo Wanta – and who, when this Mr John Chavez asked to be fired, was told by the Ambassador that he could not fire him because he had never appointed him in the first place.

Mr Chavez surfaced initially in connection with a Court-ordered medical examination and then metamorphosed into Leo Wanta’s ‘Public Defender’ without Leo’s authority. It is the right, under the American Constitution, of every American citizen to ask for, and to employ, the services of his own counsel should he wish to do so.

The Editor understands that this particular matter is of special concern to certain US Federal authorities: and rightly so. Would they kindly hasten to do something about it, then?

NEW ILLEGAL STATE TAX DOCUMENT SURFACES
Before leaving ‘Wisconsingate’ to concentrate on new Wantagate developments, the following additional scandalous information is now appended. As explained in the forensic analysis of the Wisconsin Tax Gestapo fabrications posted on 7th August, the Editor has tracked two ‘streams’ of these fabrications against Ambassador Wanta – the $14,129 ‘stream’ of civil tax assessment fabrications, paid three times, and the ‘Falls Vending’ ‘stream’.

On 13th August 2007, the Wisconsin Department of Revenue conjured a THIRD tax demand out of thin air, delivering a fanciful ‘Notice of Internet Posting’ addressed to Leo Wanta demanding the previously unheard-of sum of $131,701.13 – an amount which bears no relationship to either of the two fabricated ‘streams’ of trash mentioned above. In other words, the organised criminal cadres running or embedded within the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue have demonstrated that they are capable of inventing new false tax ‘obligations’ generated at the whim of the Wisconsin Mafioso Godfather du jour.

WISCONSIN TAX PAYMENT ADDRESSES DUPLICATED
You will recall our emphasis on the standard DUPLICATION modus operandi, explained in the reports posted in late July. In the case of ‘Falls Vending’ and this new fabricated ‘stream’, TWO payment addresses are given on the Wisconsin department of Revenue’s paperwork.

These are as follows:

Wisconsin Department of Revenue
Lisa Potts
PO Box 8901
Madison WI 53708-8901
Phone: (608) 267 0833
Fax: (608) 267 0833

Make Checks Payable and Mail to:
Wisconsin Department of Revenue
Box 93208
Milwaukee WI 53293-0208

On certain documents, the rubric ‘Make Checks Payable and Mail to:’ is replaced by: ‘For Faster Service, send Payment to’. This means that there are TWO payment addresses, enabling the cadres to ‘lose’ payments, providing scope for endless obfuscation, such as is forensically revealed in our ‘Fourth Reading’ of the Wisconsin State Tax Gestapo scams against the Ambassador posted on 7th August. Playing around with the US Postal Service – for instance, as here, causing confusion by displaying duplicated addresses to which payment may be sent – is probably illegal, and should be a matter for the attention of the US Treasury, which (see below) will become the supreme financial powerhouse in both the United States and the world, once The Wanta Plan is implemented.

AUDIT OF ALL U.S. TAX AUTHORITIES RECOMMENDED
The likely intention of current Wisconsin State tax demands against Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta, including a baseless updated ‘Falls Vending’ demand for $1,040,640.44 addressed by the Wisconsin Department of Revenue on 23rd July 2007, is to tempt the Ambassador, following his Settlement, to remit the demanded funds by way of ‘nuisance’ payments, just as he did in 1992. There is no chance of this happening.

It stands to reason that if criminal scamming of ‘taxpayers’ is taking place on such a scale and over such a prolonged period in the State of Wisconsin, the likelihood of official tax fabrication scams being rampant in other States must be high. The compromised US Federal Government needs, as a matter of extreme urgency, to assert its authority over the constituent States and to perform audits, of the tax authorities in every State of the Union, beginning with the State of Wisconsin.

Taxpayers (and non-taxpayers such as the Ambassador) who have been systematically scammed over the years by organized criminal cadres resident like viruses inside the guts of the State tax authorities, must be refunded their stolen funds with compound interest. No doubt comparably scandalous abuses exist at municipal level, as well. And nor are such organised criminal operations confined, of course, to tax authorities.

CORRUPTION IN U.S. FEDERAL DEPARTMENTS, TOO
Certain Departments and agencies of the US Federal Government, such as Health and Human Services, the Department of Agriculture, the Veterans’ Administration, and the Department of Defense, are notorious for corrupt practices, as are certain Government-Sponsored Enterprises, notably ‘Freddie Mac’ and Fannie Mae’, as exposed in earlier reports in this series.

If, in the course of the clean-up that must now take place, anything of lasting value is to emerge from the ‘Wisconsingate’ dimension of ‘Wantagate’, nothing short of a multi-year audit programme conducted under the most rigorous US Federal remit will be necessary to purge these decadent structures of the deadly criminal virus that has turned layers of US Government into scamming machines targeting the American people and foreigners for the enrichment of criminal elements who, had it not been for Wantagate, would have confirmed their Fascist hegemony following a further 9/11-type atrocity.

This will not now take place, while martial law has been cancelled, as will be explained:

INSIGHTS ON CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS
The Editor is authoritatively advised, and also deduces, that:

• The United States will not be subjected to martial law. The military will not stand for it. There are four million veterans, retired special forces officers and others, who would in any case organise the resistance. These evil plans have been torpedoed – by Wantagate.

• The heightened security and eavesdropping environment was installed not primarily in order to ‘catch terrorists’, who in any case have been trained, either directly or in the past, by Western and Soviet (Illuminati-serving) intelligence operatives, but rather to provide the organised criminal cadres who have hijacked the US Government structures, with advance intelligence on the extent to which their own massive domestic and foreign financial criminality and scamming operations were leaking into the public domain.

(In order to achieve this post-9/11 objective, a vast ‘security’ industry has been established and taken root which, of course, represents a colossal permanent drain on resources, given that it is an unproductive, parasitical labour-intensive fungus feeding on the structures of control).

• TWIN CITIES ANALYSIS: Our ‘Twin 9/11’ analysis, published here on 16th April, has since been confirmed by three US official sources. It will be recalled that we deduced that an atrocity had been planned to coincide with the Republican National Convention, which was to be inaugurated on 1st September 2008, a date which devolves (Kabbalistically-numerologically, in the mad minds of these Luciferians) to 9/11: September = 9; 1 + 2 + 8 = 11 [1st, 2008]. The intention, revealed in our report, had been to detonate four high-explosive/nuclear devices in the TWIN Cities, emulating the TWIN Towers operation, which has been authoritatively confirmed to us as having been an ‘inside job’. It was also pointed out that these Luciferians have a hang-up about TWINS. But the final twist is that the planned atrocity would have TWINNED 9/11 – one atrocity at the beginning of the Bush II reign, and a ‘matching’ atrocity at its end. The atrocity that was planned for 1st September 2008 would have provided the pretext for the martial law-backed dictatorship, which has been torpedoed in the fallout from Wantagate, and will not now occur. Exposure of the planned TWIN Cities atrocity spiked that abomination – since post-exposure, no such ‘inside job’ could possibly be undertaken without destabilisation of the planned dictatorship.

• The detailed Wantagate reports published on this website have, over the past several months, encouraged so-called ‘White Hats’ who appear to have been afraid to manifest themselves, to come forward and join the fight for the decisive re-establishment of the Rule of Law in the United States, represented by Wantagate. A ‘tipping point’ was reached which has ensured the ultimate success and decisive outcome of this de facto campaign.

• With the Wanta Settlement, the new geofinancial system, to which the world’s central banks have all subscribed, will take effect. The primary feature of this system is that ‘every dime will be taxed’, In the case of US dollar holdings held untaxed offshore, ‘owners’ of such accounts will first of all be required to pay tax on their accumulated holdings, and secondly will be obliged to declare ‘source of funds’, which many will be unable to do. Timing? Our best intelligence suggests that the new system will be installed in September 2007, for definitive implementation with effect from the new US Fiscal Year beginning on 1st October. Yet the Editor would like to stress that, while he has not been specifically informed of this fact, certain in formation he possesses strongly points to this deduction being correct, but that, at the same time, since we are dealing with a beast which has a perverse mind of its own and is cornered, this prediction cannot be relied upon.

• Under the new regime, the US Treasury will be the primary financial powerhouse in the United States – and therefore, under a US dollar system given a fresh lease of life, in the world. The final provision of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, Section 30, states that: ‘The right to amend, alter or repeal this Act is expressly reserved’. This language means that Congress can at any time take steps to abolish the Federal Reserve System, or to buy back the stock and make it part of the Treasury Department, or to alter the System as it sees fit.

(A contemporary Congressional Record entry states that the US Government can ‘buy back’ the Federal Reserve System at any time, for $450 million).

• The meeting of remaining Governors of the Federal Reserve (others having left their posts for fear of going to jail) that was scheduled to take place at the underground military ‘Continuity of Government’ (C.O.G.) sanctuary facility at Jackson Hole, Wyoming on 31st August 2007, may finesse the intended closure of the Federal Reserve and the assumption of its responsibilities by the US Treasury (on the basis of the Editor’s QUALIFIED prediction in point 5 above).

• Note: The imminent double issue of International Currency Review contains a ‘valedictory’ article, originally published by the Congressional Research Service, on the Federal Reserve System. The Congressional Research Service is an excellent, high-grade source of information, adhering to the highest standards of interpretation and scholarship.

The article states, as FACT, that the US dollar is backed by NOTHING AT ALL. Naturally, the Editor prefers this statement of the obvious to come from an official entity of the US Federal Government structures, than from our journal per se.

• It was the real prospect of the new financial system being introduced, attributable exclusively to Wantagate, which drove holders of untaxed offshore ‘fiat’ funds to seek means of obfuscating their ownership while holding onto their accruals, through dubious ‘financial collectivisation services’ offered inter alia by hedge funds/private equity. This, in turn, explains, the mad frenzy of takeover activity financed by gargantuan ‘on-the-books’ bank loans, serviced via collective offshore ‘fiat money’ holdings. With the inauguration of the new financial environment, this syndrome will no longer be possible, or make any sense. The orgy of bank lending activity hollowed out the supply of on-balance sheet credit, leading directly to the credit crunch in July.

• Her Majesty The Queen’s gold had NOT been restored when we enquired about this matter on 20th August. The Editor has so far been unable to ascertain whether this crisis is resolved with the Wanta Settlement, in accordance with the Queen’s express wishes, or not. The rank failure of the Americans to procure immediate rectification of this ‘Act of War’ against the United Kingdom has led to a discernible deterioration in relations between the two countries, as we clearly anticipated.

Evidence of this fact includes the appearance of several angry Op-Ed pages in the British press, which have appeared while the Editor has been travelling. The Editor would have greatly preferred a much more vigorous British Government response, designed to impress upon the cynical minds of the criminal US operatives concerned that such behaviour has painful costs. Not being privy to what is going on behind the scenes on this score, we cannot comment further, other than to note the rather obvious continuing evidence of deteriorating bilateral relations, and to assert that the only language these criminals understand unfortunately has to be harsh and confrontational.

• The resulting breach between Britain and America is being filled by the President of France, Nicolas Sarkozy, a first-generation Hungarian of Jewish extraction, who called on 27th August, in line with Israeli demands, for Iran to be attacked if it persists with its nuclear armament programme. This Mossad ‘line’ was reiterated a day later by President Bush, as the Psy-Ops campaign against Iran gathers momentum. No-one in the media or anywhere else has yet dared to ask why it is Okay for Britain, France, the United States, China, Pakistan, India and Israel to possess nuclear weapons, and not acceptable for Iran to possess them, despite the fact that Iran’s nuclear programme has been clandestinely assisted by the covert Soviets, European Union agents, and the United States. Nor has anyone in the media or elsewhere yet paid attention to the reality that any attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities has the potential to render the offshore hidey-holes of Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Qatar, and Bahrain uninhabitable (a view, by the way, that was very strongly held in 1990-91 by General Schwarzkopf). Because of this reality, the Editor adheres to the view that the demonic talk about a devastating attack on Iran may still be a Psy-Ops fest – although, given the wayward mentality of these people, one should not expect simple logic to feature in any of their calculations.

Remember that President George W. Bush Jr. was seen on the White House video on 19th March 2003 pumping his fists in the air and muttering ‘Feels good, feels good’, as he at long last enjoyed the ‘pleasure’ of making a bigger bang than his father.

THE MORTGAGE CREDIT SCAM AND WANTAGATE
We will now address and expose the vast nexus of corruption underlying the façade of ‘rectitude’ presented by some of the world’s largest institutions, including the Bank of England – showing that Wantagate has exposed the historically unparalleled fraud offensive perpetrated by US financial entities against naive foreign ‘takers’ of overleveraged paper supposedly backed by underlying mortgage assets but which in practice were and are backed by ZILCH. Furthermore:

• The so-called ‘sub-prime’ crisis will be shown to be a DIRECT CONSEQUENCE of the fact that Wantagate has EXPOSED THE MASSIVE SCAMMING OPERATION TO SELL UNBACKED TRASH TO FOREIGNERS THAT HAS BEEN MASTERMINDED BY U.S. ORGANISED CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS AGAINST FOREIGN ‘TAKERS’ AND INSTITUTIONS.

• FRAUDULENT FINANCE: The debts that were issued had no assets. Leveraged Debt Obligations (LDOs) issued on the basis of the non-assets had no equity. The Collateralised Debt Obligations (CDOs) based on the LDOs had no equity. As a consequence, there was and are no actual assets supporting the debt in question. Criminally, the U.S. perpetrators of these scams, operating along the same lines as the bucket shop fraudsters of the 1920s, represented that the paper they were selling to foreign ‘takers’ was underpinned by real assets, which was not the case. They have banked upon the foreign ‘takers’ failing to perform their due diligence, contrary to the US Trust Indenture Act of 1939, and relying on the names of the institutions floating the paper. Wantagate has exposed these illegal derivatives scams, triggering the ‘sub-prime’ crisis.

• DODGY FINANCE: With reference to overleveraged paper based on doubtful mortgages, if there is no or little equity in the debt, there is no or little cash-flow. Americans, Britons and others who have signed these mortgages, taking ‘advantage’ of low ‘taster’ interest rates of, say, 5%-7% for two years, and 12%++ for 28 years (or other combinations for three and 27 years) are and will be, unable to service their mortgages. This state of affairs has spawned widespread anecdotal evidence of US mortgage holders ‘re-upping’ and taking equity from their banks, and then walking away from their homes, leaving the banks holding unwanted and unsaleable real estate. Over the next 18 months, low ‘teaser’ interest rates expire on more than 2 million US adjustable-rate mortgages, resulting in sharply increased monthly payments. The latest US data confirm nationwide reductions in home real estate sale prices, while conventional US mortgage lenders will become less and less inclined to rescue overstretched homeowners and buyers, either to refinance their way out of trouble or even to sell their houses. It is already the case that some people are having to walk to work rather than take public transport, given the squeeze on their household budgets arising from this situation.

UNBACKED U.S. TRASH PAPER SOLD TO GULLIBLE FOREIGNERS
Observe from the above that we are dealing with a further manifestation of criminal DUPLICATION. The Fraudulent Finance category, which DUPLICATES the residual ‘Real Assets’ sector, represents the familiar Ponzi-style scam whereby paper backed by NOTHING is not only sold, but used as collateral, with hypothecation taking place – all based upon thin air. American banksters have been marketing this fraudulent paper to foreign ‘takers’ on the expectation, as noted, that they would fail to perform, adequate ‘due diligence’ (‘source of funds’), as has proved to be the case. The panic that has broken out in Germany and France, as this US organized crime scamming practice has been unveiled, has been widely reported, with institutions and hedge funds going to the wall as a result. Many more will undoubtedly follow on both sides of the Atlantic, and in offshore centers such as the Cayman Islands (where the Australian firm Capital Fund Management and two Bear Stearns hedge funds have filed for bankruptcy protection). In fact, given the impact on their operations that the new financial system will exert, we would expect few, if any, so-called ‘hedge funds’ to remain in business a year from now.

By failing to allow Ambassador Wanta to take economic receipt of his $4.5 trillion Settlement, as ordered (we are informed) by President George W. Bush, the US Treasury Secretary and his associates, taking opposing instructions from the former President Bush Sr, have been desperately attempting to PREVENT the new financial system, agreed by the world’s central banks, from taking effect. They have been trying to delay the inevitable, thereby illegally PREVENTING Ambassador Wanta from making $1.575 trillion immediately available ON THE BOOKS via the special allocated tax account from which the US Treasury will draw, and further preventing the US Treasury from receiving windfall tax accruals estimated by the Ambassador to be likely to average at least $100 billion per banking day from start-up. With such numbers, Congress will be able to initiate a bail-out programme for hard-hit US mortgage holders, as is currently being debated – mitigating the overall economic consequences of the otherwise inevitable downward spiral of home real estate prices with an accumulating knock-on effect on the US economy generally.

SELF-INFLICTED ANNIHILATION OF REPUBLICAN PARTY
Clearly, continuation of the criminal operations preventing the Ambassador from implementing what the G-8 powers have referred to as The Wanta Plan since June 2006, will destroy what little remains of President Bush Jr’s reputation, will contribute to the self-inflicted annihilation of the Republican Party, and will ensure the accelerated Sovietisation of the United States from January 2009 onwards.

FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE ONGOING FRAUDS
That is the general background ‘as we speak’. Now for detailed information on fraudulent operations perpetrated by holders of the highest US offices and named institutions and bank officials since mid-July 2007, exploiting the hiatus deliberately contrived through the prevention of economic receipt ON THE BOOKS of Leo Wanta’s $4.5 trillion Settlement. In what ensues, we will expose the following crimes and their perpetrators, both individuals and institutions, and how they relate to the ‘Great American Mortgage Scam’:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement.
Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft.
Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance.

STEP 1: FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT:
Given perpetuated non-performance by the US Treasury and Citibank in unlawfully withholding and exploiting the $4.5 trillion Settlement funds from Ambassador Leo Wanta and his AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. – funds that have subsequently been stolen by President George W. Bush, former US President George H. W. Bush, Vice President Richard B Cheney, US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, et al:

• On or around 18-19 July 2007, foreign governments (including China and the United Kingdom) pledged their own holdings of US Treasury securities as collateral for a cash-cash loan ostensibly intended to facilitate payment of the original $4.5 trillion cash funds that were placed in fiduciary trust with the US Treasury under the sole signatory control of the US Treasury Secretary, Henry M. Paulson, upon his arrival at the Treasury in June 2006. Those funds should have been paid to Ambassador Wanta immediately that month, but were instead corruptly diverted for other purposes by the former CEO of Goldman Sachs, who had taken in the funds in the first place and had controlled them while at his former institution, in what we subsequently described as the Grandfather of all financial conflicts of interest.

• 19 July 2007: The Bank of England and the US Treasury signified their acceptance of the Federal Reserve and the Bank of New York Mellon as the CONDUIT, via the Federal Reserve Interbank Settlement Fund, between the Bank of England and the respective banks – Credit Suisse, Union Bank of Switzerland, Deutsche Bank, Bank of America and Citibank on the one hand, and the AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. securities account with Morgan Stanley within Citibank on the other, for the transfer of a total of $6.2 trillion to AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. and some other recipients. Thus the total value of the foreign-held US Treasury securities pledged for this transaction was $6.2 trillion.

• 19 July: As previously reported, the Bank of New York Mellon informed the US Treasury that since it was now, with effect from 21st June 2007, a securities dealer following the merger with Mellon Asset Management in Pittsburgh, PA, that it would “GUARANTEE delivery [of the funds] to AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc’s securities account at Morgan Stanley’s securities account within the Citibank [NY] Morgan Stanley security house bank account” (quote unquote).

The funds were duly delivered to Bank of New York Mellon on 19th July 2007 and were supposed to just sit there, since the bank was merely a final stage of the conduit and had GUARANTEED delivery of the funds as stated, before proceeding on 20th July to the AmeriTrust securities account. The US Treasury was ready to transmit the funds; indeed the validation codes were duly obtained from the Treasury compliance officer with whom Leo Wanta and Michael C. Cottrell. M.S. were working, so that the funds could be transmitted to the Ambassador’s corporate securities account.

STEP 2: FRAUD IN FACT BY DECEIT (OBFUSCATION AND DENIAL) AND THEFT:
At that point, once again, everything ‘broke down’ from the perspective of the Ambassador and his corporation. The reason for the ‘breakdown’ was that a MULTIPLE CONTRIVED FRAUD was taking place throughout this process. We will summarise the component frauds here and then proceed with the ‘diary’, showing how they were perpetrated:

• FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT by concurring that the Bank of England, the Chinese authorities et al should go ahead and sign a ‘replacement’ loan backed by US Treasury securities, which would of course represent a mechanism to place funds ON THE BOOKS. Recall that the proceeds of bank loans are, by definition, ON THE BOOKS. In order for Ambassador Wanta’s Settlement to be paid, funds must be made available ON THE BOOKS. The Ambassador and Mr Cottrell have consistently REFUSED to countenance ANY OFF THE BOOKS financing, as previously reported.

• FRAUD IN FACT BY DECEIT AND OBFUSCATION by means of the previously reported device (elaborated below) of Bank of New York Mellon suddenly ‘requiring’ a LEVY, in order to ‘guarantee’ the funds before they could be sent on to the Morgan Stanley house securities account. This device facilitated the THEFT of the funds.

• FRAUD BY DECEPTION VIA FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE, given that the levy was signed ostensibly to ‘GUARANTEE’ the $6.2 trillion on its way. In reality, what the levy procured was that it ‘guaranteed’ the actual monies TO THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON itself, a grotesque fraud which should raise pertinent and searching questions in the minds of anyone contemplating doing business with this organisation.

• SUBSIDIARY DECEPTION DEVICES included that episode whereby Mr Cottrell was advised by Bank of New York Mellon to contact the ‘Wire Room’, which lo and behold, ‘couldn’t find’ any trace of records concerning the $4.5 trillion. This kind of snide behaviour suggests that Bank of New York Mellon may use well-honed criminal deception techniques to steal funds belonging to others.

Through this fraudulent conveyance of the $6.2 trillion ‘replacement’ loan funds to the Bank of New York Mellon, BNY Capital Markets, the bank’s subsidiary, was then immediately in a position to proceed with NEW Leveraged Debt Obligations (LDOs) and Collateralised Debt Obligations (CDOs)OFF BALANCE SHEET, out through the closed Fed system, in order to generate OFF-BALANCE SHEET accruals for individual office-holders at the White House, the US Treasury, and the Federal Reserve.

In other words, the provision of this new infusion of ON THE BOOKS loan funds stumped up by the Bank of England and the Chinese was AGAIN DIVERTED to generate illegal OFF-BALANCE SHEET windfall accruals – that is to say, YET ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY to create fiat money out of thin air for personal enrichment purposes, rather than the funds being properly applied.

This behaviour represents TREASON in time of war – and during the Second World War, would certainly have resulted in the bankers concerned being taken to an army base and shot for treason against a wall.

• FRAUD BY CONVERSION: Of course, the Bank of New York Mellon, which was supposed to have been nothing more than a CONDUIT and had GUARANTEED delivery of the $4.5 trillion to the Ambassador’s corporate securities account, also perpetrated fraud by conversion, as part of this heinous multiple fraud operation.

RESUMING OUR ‘DIARY’ OF FRAUDULENT EVENTS:

And so:

• 20 July: As previously reported, the Bank of New York Mellon proves to be slow to approve the transfer of the $4.5 trillion funds to the Ambassador’s corporate securities account, ‘finishing the paperwork’ at 9:00pm Eastern Daylight on 19th July.

• 20 July: At 2.00pm Eastern Daylight Time, the US Treasury receives notice and authority from the White House to transfer the funds from Bank of New York Mellon to the AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. corporate securities account Morgan Stanley coordinates. But Bank of New York Mellon then says it is “not ready yet” and needs 45 minutes more.

• At 3.46pm Eastern Daylight Time, the US Treasury provides Bank of New York Mellon with the validation codes plus instructions to transfer the funds to AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc’s Morgan Stanley securities account by no later than 4.00pm EDT.

• 21 July: The US Treasury confirms that the $6.2+ trillion are still held by Bank of New York Mellon. No explanation is given as to why this state of affairs has been allowed, or as to why the US Treasury’s instructions have been disregarded and so brazenly flouted. In this criminal banking environment, non sequiturs are standard practice. However (see below), the revelation that the funds are still being held by Bank of New York Mellon reveals the essence of the multiple fraud.

• 23 July: US Treasury Compliance advises that the wire instructions specifically required Mr Timothy F. Keaney, Co-Chief Executive Officer, BNY Mellon Asset Servicing, a member of Bank of New York Mellon’s Executive Committee (the organisation’s most senior management body, which overseas day-to-day operations), to register the transfer with the Wire Room, for further transfer to Morgan Stanley Securities. As we have established, the Wire Room purported to have no knowledge of the funds.

• BNY Mellon Asset Servicing boasts on its website that it is ‘recognised around the world as a leader and innovator in delivering broad capabilities that support global investment activity’ and that it is ‘the leading securities servicing provider as well as ‘the largest lender of US Treasury securities and depositary receipts, and a leading offshore fund administrator’.

• 23 July: US Treasury Compliance now advises that a message will be sent to Mr Keaney instructing him to register and place the funds on the screen. Furthermore, US Treasury Compliance will be sending a formal complaint to the Securities and Exchange Commission, banking compliance officials, and to the financial services committees of the US House of Representatives and the Senate.

• 23 July: US Treasury Compliance later advises that the complaint letters and the message to Mr Timothy F. Keaney have been STOPPED by US Treasury officials who had admonished the Treasury compliance officer concerned to cease and desist his (legitimate and correct) activities in respect of necessary oversight of the operations of the Treasury and Bank of New York Mellon, or else the compliance officer concerned would be subject to prosecution for treason against the United States under Patriot Acts I, II, and III.

This travesty by parties who are themselves engaged in committing TREASON rested upon deliberate misreadings of this legislation (although substantial portions of it were passed by Congress without legislators having ever had sight of the text, given that a huge amount of text was never made available to Congress at all and is understood never to have been published).

STEP 3: THEFT BY DECEPTION VIA FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• 26 July: A ‘levy’ has now been signed by Credit Suisse, Union Bank of Switzerland, Deutsche Bank, Bank of England, Citibank and Bank of America, and submitted to the US Treasury, the Federal Reserve and the Bank of New York Mellon, guaranteeing the cash and delivery of the funds to Bank of New York Mellon.

Here is the technical definition of such a ‘levy’, and of a ‘levy of execution’:

• “A levy… is an actual making the money out of the property…”. Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’… 4th Edition, St Paul, West Publishing Company, 1968, page 1051.

• “A levy of execution… means the setting aside of specific property from the general property of the debtor (signing banks) and placing it (the property) in the custody of the law (in this case, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Bank of New York Mellon) until it can be sold or applied to the payment of the execution”. Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’… 4th Edition, St Paul, West Publishing Company, 1968, page 1051.

• 27 July: US Treasury Compliance advises that “codes for the transfer to AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. were issued and will be presented shortly. This will facilitate the transfer of the Wanta Settlement funds to the Morgan Stanley corporate securities account.

However, any further contact with any associate connected to Ambassador Wanta or Mr Cottrell will result in prosecution by the US Treasury for TREASON [see above].

BoNY MELLON-FED-US TREASURY SCAM, UNLAWFUL ACTS AND FRAUD UNMASKED
We will now pause from the ‘diary’ before revealing dramatic developments below, and summarise JUST SOME OF the unlawful acts, frauds and securities violations perpetrated in this context by Bank of New York Mellon, BNY Capital Markets, Inc., and Mellon Financial, with the assistance of technical legal definitions of the frauds in question:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scienter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• ‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON IS IN BREACH AND OF WHICH THE SIX ‘LEVY BANKS’ MAY BE, IN BREACH [CREDIT SUISSE, UBS, DEUTSCHE BANK, BANK OF AMERICA, CITIBANK, THE BANK OF ENGLAND]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is in violation of:
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

FURTHER FRAUD, LIES, OBFUSCATION AND DECEPTION
Having committed the aforementioned felonies and deceptions (those itemised so far being not necessarily complete), the organised criminal cadres running the biggest global financial corruption operation in history then came up with new variants of their serial deceptions in August:

• It was suddenly claimed that Citibank could not handle receipt of the funds because they would need to underwrite the transaction. In response to this lie, Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., Executive Vice President and Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc, pointed out that Citibank doesn’t need to underwrite anything, as it is merely a CONDUIT for the transfer of the funds [see above].

• With that lie shot down, the next ploy was the allegation that Morgan Stanley is not large enough to handle $4.5 trillion, so Morgan Stanley could not accept the funds. Whereupon Mr Cottrell asked the US Treasury’s compliance officer to inform him whether Morgan Stanley is approved for $4.5 trillion cash-cash. Compliance telephoned an associate of Mr Cottrell to confirm that Morgan Stanley is approved for $4.5 trillion by Treasury Compliance and the Federal Reserve, and that the allegation that Morgan Stanley is not approved to handle $4.5 trillion is a lie. (Note: In fact, in the aggregate, Morgan Stanley is approved to handle at least $8.0 trillion).

• 21 August: AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. is informed that the US State Department and other parties had ‘signed off’, and that a key individual from Texas was at Citibank, New York, with effect from 11.00 am on 20th August ‘getting paid out’, a process that was likely to take ‘many hours’ [sic], and that AmeriTrust Groupe Inc, is ‘next on the list’ [sic]. This of course is back-to-front. Nothing can move until the Ambassador is paid, for reasons explained in our late July postings.

‘PUMPING UP THE STOCK MARKET’ WITH WANTA’S MONEY
In the published version of this report, which will be published as a Special Supplement to be distributed worldwide with the imminent double issue of International Currency Review, two charts will show how the Ambassador’s funds were used inter alia to ‘pump up the stock market’. This was achieved by keeping the funds with Bank of New York Mellon in collaboration with the Federal Reserve, directing liquidity via the CIA’s Bank of America to create a frantic buying/selling frenzy between Bank of America, Citibank et al – so that wheeling and dealing within the closed group of banks would both ‘pump up the stock market’ and at the same time generate profits which could then be split inter alia between the six ‘levy’ banks.

Thus the six ‘levy’ banks are CO-CONSPIRATORS engaged in this carousel of ongoing fraud.

INTRA-WEEK TRADING RANGE OF 1,000 POINTS POSSIBLE
The up/down yo-yo New York stock market intra-week trading range so far established for scamming purposes appears to be between 250 and 350 points in the late August holiday market. But in September, when traders are back at their desks in force, the intra-week exploitative trading range could easily widen to as much as 1,000 points, if the Ambassador has still not been paid. Such conditions would tip the US economy and the world into an uncontrollable crisis and a period of financial and economic instability without historical precedent

GLENN AUTORINO FIRED AS ‘SACRIFICIAL LAMB’
The securities house BNY Capital Markets Inc, owned by Mellon Financial, has been engaged in particularly heinous fraudulent activity. Earlier in August, Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., telephoned John Mohr at Bank of New York Mellon, who said he would ‘look into the matter’ (in the same non-committal vein as Mr Frazier of the Wisconsin Department of Revenue, who did nothing after he told the Editor on 3rd November 2006 that he would ‘have to look into’ his Department’s tax fabrications against the Ambassador, as previously reported).

Mr Mohr then contacted Glenn Autorino, Managing Director and Co-Head of Syndicated Finance at BNY Capital Markets, Inc., the Managing Director and co-head of the institution’s Syndicated Finance Group. This fellow was previously a Vice President and founding member of the Barclays Middle Market Corporate Finance Group, where he provided private placement and financial advisory services to ‘middle market’ clients. Barclays is ‘not a nice’ institution.

Mr Autorino was not only the compliance officer for Bank of New York Mellon: he was also the compliance officer for the corrupt Bank of England in respect of the entire $6.2+ trillion referred to above. As a consequence of Mr Mohr’s internal investigations, it was established that Autorino had been taking orders from Mr Donald Kohn, Governor of the Federal Reserve Board, NOT TO RELEASE THE FUNDS TO THE AMBASSADOR.

Faced with this situation (which of course they must have known all about) the General Management decided that they needed a ‘sacrificial lamb’, and accordingly they FIRED GLENN AUTORINO. That, of course, does not mean that the Directors of BNY Capital Markets, Inc, are not culpable, because manifestly they are. Later, when Mr Cottrell telephoned Mr Mohr a second time, the voice at the other end said, quick as a flash: ‘Oh, he’s gone for the day. Goodbye’. But both Mohr and Keaney remained in situ at the time of this posting – once again raising the pertinent question: WHAT ON EARTH ARE THE GOLD BADGES FOR? DECORATION?

‘SUB-PRIME’ CRISIS ERUPTED AS THEY WERE BEING FOUND OUT
In other words, BNY Capital Markets, Inc., GOT FOUND OUT. And this is the generic reason for the so-called ‘sub-prime’ market crisis, which continues to reverberate around the world; and it is the generic reason for the associated stock market near-crash and its subsequent severe wobbles:

AS A DIRECT CONSEQUENCE OF THE ILLEGAL CAROUSEL GAMES THESE CRIMINALS HAVE BEEN PLAYING WITH AND SURROUNDING THE WANTA FUNDS, THE BANKSTERS AND THEIR OFFICIAL SPONSORS ARE GETTING FOUND OUT.

Yet, notwithstanding that these criminal operatives and banksters are being unmasked and found out, THEY ARE CONTINUING WITH THEIR CRIMINAL FINANCIAL OPERATIONS – and appear hell-bent on manufacturing as much untaxed ‘fiat’ money for themselves, which they intend to continue holding offshore while at the same time postponing the inevitable installation of the new international financial system to which the world’s central banks have all agreed.

Indeed, at the widely-publicised meeting between Senator Christopher Dodd (Stalin’s grandson), Dr Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, and Henry M. Paulson, the US Treasury Secretary on DATE, at which Senator Dodd was supposed to have read the riot act to these clowns, and cited the NASD an d SEC Regulations of which they are in breach, Dr Bernanke specifically undertook ‘to do everything in his power’ to ensure that the Wanta Settlement is finalised – a pledge that he and his colleague Mr Kohn have, of course, immediately reneged upon. While Bernanke was giving this empty undertaking, Mr Paulson reportedly sat there long-faced and indicated by his body language that he disagreed and had no intention of complying.

THEY USUALLY OPERATE WITH TWO SETS OF INSTRUCTIONS
In case the Rest of the World is now more confused than ever, please remember the Leninist DUPLICATION rule which governs everything these Luciferians do. This applies at every dimension and at every stage of all such American official and bankster financial scamming operations, whether perpetrated against their own people or against the gullible Rest of the World.

Specifically:

• All concerned may have TWO SETS OF INSTRUCTIONS.

• This equips them with the option of speaking out of both sides of their face, with impunity (so they imagine), and of choosing which set of instructions to comply with, depending on the time of day.

• All these illegal transactions are duplicated, either specifically (deal by deal) or generically, as in the case of the $27.5 trillion raised in 1989-92 to ‘match’ the $27.5 trillion of which Ambassador Wanta remains the sole owner, Principal, and Trustor, to this day. The $27.5 trillion raised from the 200+ international banks has been FROZEN, by the way, for some time (jeopardising also, of course, the $300+ trillion overleveraged on the base of the aggregate $27.5 trillion as collateral).

• As we have seen above, this Leninist, double-minded DUPLICATION principle ‘enables’ organised crime to overleverage and sell TOTAL TRASH to complacent foreign ‘takers’ who may perform inadequate or zero ‘due diligence’, while at the same time intermingling such paper with paper based on low-quality underlying assets (that is to say, a modicum of actual substance). Both such operations represent ABSOLUTE, TOTAL FRAUD that is no different in concept from the bucket shop frauds of the 1920s and the classic Ponzi schemes of that era.

• Equipped with his DUPLICATED sets of orders – one ostensibly from President Bush Jr. requiring Leo Wanta’s Settlement to be paid, and countermanding instructions from former President Bush Sr. demanding that Paulson should continue to frustrate the Wanta payment (at least until Bush Sr. has recovered the $2.0 trillion that he lost early in the year, but probably with the intention of perpetuating the frauds), Paulson has continued to follow the DUPLICATED instructions he has received from Bush Sr. In so doing, Paulson is committing TREASON against the United States by taking instructions from a former President contrary to the instructions handed down by the incumbent President. By exploiting this deliberate dialectical dichotomy, Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. are able to continue their reckless scams, even though their treachery and fraudulent criminal activity is being exposed almost in ‘real time’.

AMERICAN FINANCIAL WARFARE OPS. AGAINST ‘ALLIES’
A further dimension of all this is that the US Federal Reserve and the US Treasury appear to be engaged in Financial Warfare operations against so-called US ‘allies’. We have seen how the US organised crime syndicate lodged at the highest level of the US Government and its associates, have stolen The Queen’s gold in a blatant ‘Act of War’ against the United Kingdom. By the same token, US operatives have been systematically scamming French and German banks, selling them worthless trash paper backed by no assets, which has been bought exclusively by association on the name of the purportedly reputable institution or entity pushing the paper. But beneath the veneer of banking and financial ‘rectitude’, the sordid reality is that the buyer is dealing with organised crime lurking behind the cover of the US name.

UNPRECEDENTED GLOBAL INTELLIGENCE WAR
And behind this Financial Warfare lurks an unprecedented global and US domestic intelligence war, which in turn reflects the ruthless eruption of Luciferian animosities that have been raging for years behind the scenes between different factions of the Illuminati, and which have broken out into open-ended secret warfare. The US organised criminal cadres that have hijacked key power centres within the US structures are taking advantage of this state of affairs and may be planning to go to war with Iran in order to cover up their criminality, rather than see their stolen fake ‘assets’ taxed and frozen following the installation of the reformed ON THE BOOKS financial system which The Wanta Plan will initiate – and to which the Group of Seven powers have acceded and the world’s central banks have agreed to support.

But in order to achieve this escape route, they need to full support of the US military, which is reliably understood to be furious that it, like the US State Department, is being systematically deceived and lied to by the White House, the Treasury and the Fed. More to the point. going to war will NOT make this FINANCIAL crisis ‘go away’. THIS crisis cannot be buried by another crisis, as THIS crisis will ‘eat up’ any crisis these maniacs may be plotting to instigate.

US unbacked trash transactions modelled along the lines generically described above necessitated the initial sudden extension of a 17.3 billion Euro ($23.6 billion) line of credit to Landesbank Sachsen Girozentrale (Sachsen LB), which had exposures to dodgy investments of 17 billion Euros, equal to more than ten times its core capital and to over 25% of its total assets, by a group of German savings banks on 17th August, prior to the troubled entity being ‘sold’ to Landesbank Baden Wurttemberg.

Stefan Kleusder a Sachsen LB Board Member in charge of a subsidiary operation based in Dublin, resigned as the bank’s ‘sacrificial lamb’ on 23rd August. On the following day, BayernLB, a large state-owned German bank, acknowledged that it had invested in ‘assets’ described as being ‘linked to risky US home loans’ – without of course admitting that it was actually referring to unbacked US TRASH derivatives scamming paper.

Earlier, in late July, the German bank IKB Deutsche Industriebank, required a bailout worth 8 billion Euros, with the state bank KfW, already the owner of 37% of KfB, agreeing to assume financial responsibility for the bank’s failed investments in paper backed by US mortgage loans described as ‘poorly rated’ but which in fact were TRASH, with NO UNDERLYING ASSET BACKING AT ALL.

FLOGGING WORTHLESS UNBACKED U.S. PAPER TO FOREIGNERS
In other words, these American scamsters and banksters – aided and abetted by Barclays Bank, which is among the most active British institutions in this field (just look at the faces of its top personnel) – have been escaping the statutory need for US securities to be registered. They have been ignoring the ‘Blue Sky’ laws, a stance facilitated by the so-called ‘reform’ of the Glass-Steagall Act which had separated investment banking from commercial banking following the crises of the 1920s and 1930s precisely to frustrate such criminal excesses; and they have at the same time been conducting economic warfare against Britain, France and Germany by pumping out unbacked, overleveraged trash paper, irrespective of the consequences. We did warn Germany that its risky accumulation of questionable paper might have serious consequences given the lethal animosity of these organised criminals, and it looks as though that warning was accurate – as Chancellor Merkel may finally be starting to understand.

In recent weeks, the Bundesbank and the German Finance Ministry have attempted repeatedly to soothe the anxieties of investors, by disseminating the lie that Germany’s banking sector exposure to the so-called ‘sub-prime fallout’ is limited to only a small number of institutions.

WANTA FUNDS FINANCING THEIR FASCIST AGENDA
While all this has been going on, the Cheney-Bush financial crime syndicate, now joined by Nicolas Sarkozy, are exploiting the Wanta-designated loan funds provided by the Bank of England and the Chinese, in de facto pursuit of their Fascist agenda to buy up the real economy in a series of corrupt ‘sweetheart deals’.

Using the Wanta trillions as base, they are floating new, overleveraged hypothecated paper developed by their associates for their buddies, to finance more and more ‘in-house real economy sweetheart deals’ – enabling the Big Barons (Bush Sr. Bush Jr., Cheney, et al) to buy up the resulting good paper, and the properties underlying them. So, all of a sudden, they are not buying debt any more: they are buying real, on-the-books assets, along classic corporate Fascist lines.

Among such deals which, lo and behold, have been arranged by BNY Capital Markets Inc, have been the acquisitions of Xcel Energy (for $800 million), Winstar (for $1,15 billion), CVS, the pharmacy chain (for $795 million), Silverstein Properties, the former Twin Towers landlord ($140 million), Insight Communications ($1.75 billion), Hilton ($1,145 billion), Westvaco ($500 million), Cordiant Communications Group ($400 million) and Salem Communications Corporation ($225 million).

YET THEY KNOW WHAT’S COMING DOWN…
Supplementing the Fascist-corporatist political motive here, ironically, is the need these people instinctively and paradoxically feel, given the immense pressure exerted by Wantagate, to replace or supplement their offshore, off-balance sheet untaxed assets with onshore, taxable, on-balance sheet real counterpart assets. This demonstrates their comprehensive double-mindedness.

On the one hand, they keep delaying the inevitable initiation of the new financial system to which the world’s central banks have committed, while on the other hand they are nonetheless preparing for the inauguration of the new financial system. That way, they hedge their bets, in their usual double-minded, two-faced, dialectical Illuminati manner.

In the meantime, by delaying implementation of The Wanta Plan, depriving the US Treasury of massive on-balance sheet tax accruals while they enrich themselves personally off-balance sheet, they are corroding the real US economy – completing the process that Bush Sr. began when he initiated the offshoring of manufacturing production which has hollowed out US and British manufacturing capacity (in accordance with pan-German long-range strategy) – and destroying the middle class, while these criminal cadres hype their own paper assets with money stolen from the Chinese, the Bank of England and Ambassador Wanta’s AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., selling the paper and assets to themselves at huge profits on-balance sheet, and using BNY Capital Markets, Inc., which holds Leo Wanta’s $4.5 trillion, as the vehicle to tidy up their books.

Instead of buying debt, they are now concentrating, as indicated, on buying ‘real’ assets – indicating a possible ultimate intention or illusion of ‘going straight’ when they have to face the reality of the new ‘clean’ international financial system.

CHINESE GRIEVANCES AGAINST THE UNITED STATES
The Chinese, in particular, have been deceived so often by these organised US criminals-in-office, that serious consequences may ensue at any time – not excluding extensive Chinese dumping of US Treasury securities, and other financial ‘warfare’ operations. It is likely, inter alia, that the Chinese authorities will be cooperating with the ICJ to have the US Treasury Secretary arrested, given the multiple deceptions, thefts, lies and frauds that Mr Paulson has relentlessly perpetrated against them since he took office in June 2006, and first hijacked the $4.5 trillion originally sent over by the People’s Bank of China, as reported in the Petition for a Writ of Mandamus [see the posting dated 9th August 2007]. This was particularly offensive to them, since Ambassador Wanta, the only American they trust (with good reason), was given the probably unprecedented private honour – just as The Queen honoured Ambassador Wanta with an honorary knighthood in recognition of his special services on behalf of the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth.

Moreover given the US Treasury Secretary’s appalling behaviour when he visited the Chinese capital at the beginning of August, literally anything could happen on this score. On meeting Madame Wu, the Chinese Minister of Finance, the uncouth Paulson shook her by the hand and grabbed her by the shoulder, pulling her close to him.

Even in the West, such behaviour to a respected lady would be considered disgraceful. But to Madame Wu and the Chinese, who are always very well behaved, such behaviour was nothing less than a gross, disgusting, barbaric affront.

Chinese contacts have informed us that Henry Paulson’s crude antics were such an affront that Madame Wu screamed at him, while senior Party officials screamed at him likewise, and told him to go home. Specifically, Paulson was told that his presence, especially given his dreadful display of crude bad manners, was not required and that he should ‘get his butt back to the United States and pay Wanta’. So he packed his bags and left.

THE MOST CORRUPT TREASURY SECRETARY OF ALL TIME
Before this fellow was sworn in as Treasury Secretary in 2006, he told an informant, whom Paulson himself mentored at Goldman Sachs, that he would be taking care of Ambassador Wanta. But on being sworn in, Paulson betrayed this undertaking and advised President Bush that if he was given carte blanche, he could make all of the ‘buddies’ a great deal of money – an undertaking with which the President concurred. Given Paulson’s questionable past reputation, that was to be expected. But the man seems wholly impervious to the fact that he is loathed by all Western Governments, the Chinese and the Russians, and that he has earned for himself a reputation as the most corrupt and disastrous US Treasury Secretary of all time – which is quite a record, given that most US Treasurers have been corrupted. But this man Paulson is in a category all on his own, as the whole world reading these reports will agree.

GREENSPAN TRIED TO STEAL $3.0 TRILLION
As for the operative in whose tradition Paulson functions – the lately imprisoned and subsequently released former Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Dr Alan Greenspan – he was of course ‘running’ Ambassador Wanta’s money, plus the DUPLICATED $27.5 trillion, under Presidents Bush Sr. and Clinton. Then he tried to steal $3.0 trillion for himself – and got caught. He was given a certain transactional immunity from December 2005 and through 2006 to perform on the Wanta Settlement, but failed (on purpose), and then left office as he had earlier indicated he would, when he had been reappointed for an unprecedented fifth term (so that he could continue the lucrative off-balance sheet scams on behalf of all concerned). The precise triggers for Greenspan’s arrest on or around 15th June this year are not known to the Editor: but, as with Sir Eddie (Lord) George, they had to do with the continuing frustration of the Wanta Settlement.

FASCIST (DVD) MASTERPLAN AGAINST ‘THE MAIN ENEMY’
Taking a broader view, in conclusion, we can see that this open-ended high-level corruption behaviour represents part of a pathetic Fascist masterplan to accelerate the depletion of the US (and British) economies, and to generate conditions which would make it possible for the offshore money controlled by the organized crime syndicate sitting at the apex of the US Federal Government, to pick up real assets at fire-sale prices across-the-board, as was attempted in 1929 and the early 1930s. Such an outcome would, as intended, create two classes: the privileged, monied elite living off stolen funds and assets, and the serfs.

This mad agenda is self-evidently at loggerheads with, and extremely antagonistic to, The Wanta Plan, which will refinance the United States by conducting legal, taxed high-yield investment programmes for the immediate ongoing windfall benefit of the US Treasury – so that, instead of proceeds going into privately held untaxed offshore accounts, as has scandalously been the case since the crime syndicate seized lethal control of the Federal Government at the highest levels, the enormous ongoing taxed accruals will transform the US Treasury’s finances, enabling urgently needed infrastructure projects to be undertaken after decades of neglect, taxes to be reduced over time, and the Treasury’s immense and unsustainable ‘background debt’ to be paid down – with all transactions conducted transparently and on the books.

THESIS: THE UNSTABLE, CORRUPT STATUS QUO.
ANTITHESIS: THE STABILISING WANTA PLAN
In other words, what can now be seen with crystal clarity is the following typically Illuminist dialectic:

• Thesis: Unstable criminal Fascist takeover of real assets using stolen money and illegal untaxed offshore assets held off the books and brought onshore, no questions asked, yielding when taken to its logical conclusion two classes: the monied elite and the serfs – a certain recipe for a messy dictatorship, since authoritarian control and concentration camps are the only means by which such a system can survive, albeit only for a brief period of time, contrary to the Hitlerian aspiration of the Thousand-Year Reich (hinted at by the DVD chief, George Bush Sr. when he spoke about ‘a thousand points of light’). At the same time, by not remitting the funds already paid by the Chinese to the Ambassador, the syndicate has created a house of cards: the stock market was lucky not to have collapsed by 2,000 points on 17th August 2007. Since Ambassador Leo Wanta’s securities account had not taken receipt of the long overdue $4.5 trillion, the European institutions were withholding dollars to help force the issue – thereby depleting aggregate liquidity in the dollar system (with the balance of payments deficits now scarcely covered by foreign inflows).

• Antithesis: The Wanta Plan, refinancing the US Treasury and the US economy, precluding the otherwise likely recession or depression, creating sound, sustainable prosperity for all both at home and abroad, revalidating the US dollar as the world’s denomination currency, stabilising the stock market, banishing real fears of a hyperinflation, and facilitating real and lasting tax cuts right across the board. Under the intended new financial system, all economic participants will be taxed, and the maintenance of untaxed, secret offshore accounts will become a thing of the past, except in the offshore centres themselves, to which locations some will flee. However all transactions originally conducted in dollars will be traceable, thanks to derivatives of the PROMIS software, which can trace up to 100 transactions backwards, we are advised. Finally, implementation of The Wanta Plan, even at this late stage, has the potential to rescue the confused, compromised, myopic, self-serving Republican Party from suffering an election defeat so massive – even taking account of any intended gross manipulation of electronic voting equipment and voting lists – that it could be out of power for a generation, or destroyed altogether, as the orchestrated sharing of power between the two dialectical components of ‘The Party’ collapses. (It is the stated intention of the covert Soviet dimension of the World Revolution that no ‘conservative’ parties should continue to exist). And lastly, The Wanta Plan still retains the potential to save President George Bush Jr. from the fate of being remembered as by far the worst President in American history.

• Synthesis: Untypically, no synthesis between these two dialectical ‘opposites’ is possible. Both Ambassador Wanta and Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., have doggedly insisted throughout, that they will NOT operate clandestinely off-the books. Everything will be done transparently and on the books, in accordance with the new financial environment agreed by the world’s central banks, and there will be a level taxation playing field for all (with the promise and reality, by definition, of the reward of progressive tax reductions in the United States over time).

NO RECONCILIATION BETWEEN THEM IS POSSIBLE
It can be seen that these two opposing regimes are anathema to one another – so much so, in fact, that the Thesis will CERTAINLY LEAD TO A CATASTROPHIC INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC DISASTER, whereas (late) implementation of The Wanta Plan will GUARANTEE THE REFINANCING, REHABILITATION AND LONG-TERM PROSPERITY OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE REST OF THE WORLD FOR A GENERATION.

• Addendum, 30 August 2007: As at 1.00pm Eastern Daylight Time on this date, the Ambassador’s stolen/diverted $4.5 trillion had still not been credited to the AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. corporate securities account with Morgan Stanley/Citibank, New York. Gold Badges had again been purposely misled by the US Treasury, the White House and the Federal Reserve, which were saying that Ambassador Wanta had been paid – the same trick as that perpetrated by Paulson back in the fall of 2006. On telephoning Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., the Gold Badges found out of course that the Ambassador has not been paid. Mr Cottrell advocates the immediate arrest of Donald A Kohn, Henry M. Paulson and the former US Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales.

• Continuing fall-out: The head of Collateralised Debt Obligations (CDOs) at Barclays Capital, Ed Cahill, has left the firm, as have CDO specialists at Bear Stearns, Citibank and HSBC. Rick Caplan, Managing Director and co-head of CDOs at RBS Greenwich Capital has left the bank along with six of his colleagues. Royal Bank of Scotland aggressively and profitably marketed CDOs , both originating deals and selling them on. Mr Caplan had previously been with Citigroup, where he had been co-head of credit derivatives, and had once advised Enron. He appeared before a US Senate Committee investigating the ensuing US intelligence-manipulated scandal. Citigroup was accused by Senators of helping Enron to disguise debts through sham transactions ‘worth’ billions of dollars, whereas the bank argued that such transactions were legitimate! On 29th August, London-based Cheyne Capital, a hedge fund, managed at the last moment to cobble together a loan of 3.3 billion pounds from large institutions, to prevent its immediate collapse.

APPENDIX: The following International Herald Tribune article is appended.

The article confirms that academics and selected market participants are apt to address every related issue under the sun, except the one issue that is most relevant to the crisis they are concerned about – the CRIMINALISATION of the financial markets led by the United States.

WHY IS IT THAT THESE PEOPLE CANNOT YET UNDERSTAND, EVEN AT THIS LATE STAGE, THAT WE ARE DEALING WITH SYSTEMATIC ONGOING U.S. CRIMINAL INTELLIGENCE AND BANKSTER SCAMMING OPERATIONS DESIGNED SO AS TO FLEECE FOREIGN INSTITUTIONAL AND OTHER ‘TAKERS’ ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT THEY PROBABLY FAIL TO PERFORM NECESSARY DUE DILIGENCE, AND WILL RELY ON THE NAME? URGENT MESSAGE TO THE REST OF THE WORLD: FOR HEAVEN’S SAKE, WAKE UP, AND TAKE ON BOARD THAT THIS IS A FASCIST ORGANISED CRIMINAL ATTACK ON CIVILISATION!

One inadequate reason for this blindness, to which the Editor has alluded in the recent past, is that, in the serene and untroubled academic world, professors have no experience at all of organised criminal behaviour. The very concept is utterly alien to such people.

It is less alien to market participants who comment on these matters, and who should know better.

CALLS GROW LOUDER FOR INTERNATIONAL OVERVIEW OF U.S. MARKETS
By Heather Timmons and Katrin Bennhold

International Herald Tribune: Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Politicians, regulators and financial specialists outside the United States are seeking a role in oversight of American markets, banks and rating agencies in the wake of recent problems related to subprime mortgages.

Their argument is simple: The United States is exporting financial products, but losses to investors in other countries suggest that American regulators are not properly monitoring the products or alerting investors to the risks.

“We need an international approach, and the United States needs to be part of it”, said Peter Bofinger, a member of the German Government’s economics advisory board and a Professor at the University of Würzburg.

While regulators in the United States have not been receptive to the idea in the past, analysts said that Europe and Asia have more leverage this time around. Washington might have to yield if it wants to succeed in imposing bilateral regulations on state-owned investment funds from emerging economies.

“America depends on the rest of the world to finance its debt,” Bofinger said. “If our institutions stopped buying their financial products, it would hurt”.

Banks and investment funds from China to France were recently hit with heavy losses after buying mortgage-related securities and complex financial products originating from the United States.

In many cases, investors were caught by surprise because American rating agencies gave the products top ratings, leading buyers to believe there was little risk. International investors are also asking why American banks were allowed to give mortgages to home buyers who could not repay them.

“In a globalized economy with hedge funds, leveraged buyouts and all these investment funds, we have to ask the question about more transparency”, said Claude Bébéar, Chairman of the Supervisory Board of AXA, one of the world’s largest insurers.

Half a dozen U.S. banking and financial regulators including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Federal Reserve Board would not comment. [Editor: They could hardly comment, could they, as they are ‘part of the problem’ – Ed.]. Several mentioned, however, that they were not the sole regulators of the subprime market.

In Europe, the credit crisis appears to have emboldened those who have pushed for stricter international rules for some time.

The German Government was rebuffed by Washington and London earlier when it pushed for an international code of conduct for hedge funds [at the G-8 Meeting in June – Ed.]. Now some economic advisers to the German Government are going further, suggesting that rating agencies should be nationalized, that large-scale loans be registered publicly and that minimum standards be developed for complex debt securities.

The head of the French Council of Economic Analysis, which advises the Prime Minister, said hedge funds should be subject to stricter disclosure rules about their risk exposure.

Christian de Boissieu, President of the group and a member of the Committee for Credit and Investment Institutions, which helps regulate the French banking sector, is also calling for a global register of all hedge funds. In addition, he said, complex securities should be scrutinized before being authorized for banking portfolios.

President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, who has vowed to “moralize financial capitalism” (a remarkable statement, in view of his alleged participation following his visit to Kennebunkport – Ed.) has asked his Finance Minister, Christine Lagarde, to prepare a proposal for stricter disclosure rules on market participants before a meeting of the Group of 7 countries’ finance ministers in October [at the IMF/World Bank Annual Meetings – Ed.].

On Monday, in a foreign policy speech, Sarkozy called again for an enhanced global rule book to avoid financial crises.

Such crises could recur, “if the leaders of major countries fail to take resolute concerted action to foster transparency and regulation of international markets”, Sarkozy said.

The Chinese central bank said on Tuesday that it was moving to standardize information disclosure of all asset-backed securities as it expands its own market for these financial instruments. Information about loans, terms and borrowers will need to be included in any new securities that are introduced in China, it said.

The United States and Britain are the genesis of the bulk of the world’s sophisticated financial products, like the ones that broke down recently, in part because Wall Street banks have a big presence in both countries.

“At the heart of the issue is that the largest financial institutions continue to innovate and create ever more sophisticated products”, said Chris Rexworthy, director of enhanced regulatory services at IMS Consulting, a London compliance consulting firm, and a former regulator with the British Financial Services Authority. [NO. At the heart of the issue is the fact that criminal practices (selling unbacked overleveraged trash securities to unsuspecting foreigners) have proved highly lucrative for US and British financial institutions, which have turned blind eyes to the reality that such unregistered securities marketing operations are criminal activities – Ed.].

Regulators around the world talk about the importance of stress-testing, Rexworthy said, but the recent developments create concerns that “institutions are either not investing enough effort in this, getting it wrong, or just producing things too complex for their risk-assessment models to cope with”, he said. “Greater cooperation on the international stage between regulators is undoubtedly one of the things we need to see more of”.

U.S. regulators are aware of the problem. American banking and financial services regulators conducted a series of surveys and reviews dating back to 2005 that found that credit standards had loosened for home loans, and that borrowers in some cases did not understand or qualify for the loans they were given.

Some financial institutions are managing the risk from nontraditional mortgage loans by following more prudent underwriting, the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation said in September 2006, while some are “spreading the risk of these products to investors”.

Some American regulators have been pushing for more international cooperation in general. The Securities and Exchange Commission has been discussing greater hedge fund oversight in recent months, and it has signed several cooperation agreements with regulators from China to Germany over the past 18 months.

The Commission is a “very active member” of the International Organization of Securities Commissions, the global body that brings together all securities regulators, said Andrew Larcos, the international group’s Public Affairs Officer. “They do understand the need for closer international cooperation”. Still, he added, because the subprime mortgage loans that kicked off this current crisis [NOT TRUE: SEE ABOVE – ED.] were primarily from the United States, the situation “obviously raises questions about how that market is regulated”.

In the United States, much of the blame is being focused on rating agencies [scapegoats – Ed.], which are paid by banks for rating products, and which sometimes attached investment-grade ratings to securities that turned out to be less so.

Joseph Mason, a finance Professor at Drexel University in Philadelphia, and Josh Rosner, Managing Director of the research firm Graham Fisher, have pushed for more oversight of rating agencies.

“It’s not just the U.S. regulators that failed, though they did fail”, Rosner said. International banking regulators have “thrown the keys to the rating agencies”, which have been left in charge of the safety and soundness of bank capital, insurance and pension money.

In Australia, where investors have embraced financial products like derivatives and swaps, several hedge funds were hard hit by exposure to subprime loans, and analysts said they expected it would be months before the extent of the problem is seen.

As geographical boundaries are broken down, “a problem in one location is a problem everywhere”, said Dick Bryan, a Professor of Economics at the University of Sydney. In the aftermath of a credit crunch, “there is the need to challenge the sovereignty of national regulators – why should the rules of lending in the U.S. be left to U.S. regulators when the consequences go everywhere?”

Asian nations were pushing for some regional cooperation even before the credit crisis, as cross-border investing and their equity markets have boomed. The South Korean market regulator, the Financial Supervisory Committee, has been particularly vocal on the issue.

“Regulators and policymakers in the region are quietly looking at the unfolding developments and asking many questions to themselves about what’s happening and what should be done”, said Douglas Kim, a spokesman for the South Korea regulator. “Few would doubt that more policy cooperation and coordination are in the region’s interest even in times of market calm”, he said.

In general, Washington’s reaction has been that it wants “no form of oversight”, said Kenneth Rogoff, an economics Professor at Harvard and a former Chief Economist of the International Monetary Fund. “We’re talking about America’s most dynamic export industry”. ENDS.

Editor’s observation: So, ‘America’s most dynamic export industry’ consists of criminally marketing unbacked trash derivatives paper to unsuspecting foreigners who don’t do their due diligence.

LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR SIR LEO WANTA’S TAGGED $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT HIGHEST U.S. LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006, AND HAVE CONTINUED THEIR SERIAL FINANCIAL CRIMES EVER SINCE:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war

This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Sir Leo Wanta’s funds.

The Directors and others listed in Part 1 of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and others posted on 11th June may likewise be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious violation of the laws itemised above.

U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: MISPRISION OF FELONY:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

NEW WANTAGATE ISSUE OF INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW: SEPTEMBER 2007
An announcement about the new Wantagate issue of International Currency Review, (544 pages) and its 48-page Supplement showing the Wanta-related documents released by the Ronald Reagan Library by consent of the National Security Agency, will be posted in the near future, on the second (Books/Subs) panel, Home Page. A further Supplement containing inter alia flow-charts showing
how the corrupt financial carousel operates (in the above context) will also be distributed. Orders for International Currency Review may be placed using the secure ordering facility on this site.

The Ronald Reagan Library documents prove of course that Leo Emil Wanta advised and served President Reagan personally. In the massive forthcoming Wantagate ICR, the Editor has assembled all the Presidential Pardons dished out by President Clinton, to demonstrate that the vast majority of those pardoned by that particular criminal US President were drug dealers, money-launderers, financial criminalists, murderers-for-hire, and perpetrators of abominations familiar to students of organised crime. It was with particular interest that the Editor noticed that some of those pardoned had been imprisoned for ‘Misprision of felony’*. This section, called ‘Pardongate’ will be found in the front part of the forthcoming issue. (One poor fellow was imprisoned for stealing four pounds of butter, which adds to our perception that, on the same penal tariff, the perpetrators of the financial crimes that we have had to expose, face several lifetimes in the US GULAG each).

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review [ISSN 0020-6490] cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier Wantagate reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, malevolent suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

LEO WANTA’S PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CASE NUMBER: 1:2007CV00609 – TSE – BRP: ALEXANDRIA

Thursday 5 July 2007 16:04

THE BIGGEST FINANCIAL SCANDAL IN WORLD HISTORY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Case Number: 1:2007cv00609 – TSE – BRP

Filed: 20th June 2007

Petitioner: Lee E. Wanta

Respondents: Henry M. Paulson, Jr., Robert M. Kimmitt, James R. Wilkinson, Michael Chertoff, Alberto R. Gonzales and Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

Court: Virginia Eastern District Court

Office: Alexandria Office

County: Richmond

Presiding Judge: District Judge T. S. Ellis III

Referring Judge: Magistrate Judge Barry R. Poretz

Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges

Cause: 28: 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant

Jury demanded by: None

Note: This case cannot be sealed until Ambassador Leo E. Wanta has been paid the $4.5 trillion of his Settlement diverted and exploited illegally since June 2006.

The Court has, most unusually, given the Respondents TWO MONTHS to respond.

SIR LEO WANTA’S PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS (1)
The text of the Ambassador’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus follows:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Civil Action no.: 1-07 CV 609

LEE E. WANTA, LEO E. WANTA, AMBASSADOR LEO WANTA (Individually and as sole and exclusive shareholder of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., a Commonwealth of Virginia registered corporation)

Petitioner

v.

HENRY M. PAULSON, JR.
SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY
UNITED STATES TREASURY, and

ROBERT M. KIMMITT
DEPUTY SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY
UNITED STATES TREASURY, and

JAMES R. WILKINSON
CHIEF OF STAFF
UNITED STATES TREASURY, and

MICHAEL CHERTOFF
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, and

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND
DIRECTOR AND/OR MANAGER OF OPERATIONS,
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA

Respondents

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
AND OTHER EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF

A. PARTIES:

1. LEE E. WANTA, LEO E. WANTA, AMBASSADOR LEO WANTA
5516 Falmouth Street
Suite 108
Richmond, Virginia 23230: Petitioner

2. Henry M. Paulson, Jr.
Secretary of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20220: Respondent

3. Robert M. Kimmitt
Deputy Secretary of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20220: Respondent

4. James R. Wilkinson
Chief of Staff
United States Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20220: Respondent

5. Michael Chertoff
Secretary of Homeland Security
Washington, D.C.: respondent

6. Alberto R. Gonzales
Attorney General
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20530-0001: Respondent

7. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
701 East Byrd Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219: Respondent

B. JURISDICTION:

1. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this cause of action pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 85, Section 1361 (mandamus), Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 85, Section 1331, and Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 85, Section 1332.

C. VENUE:

2. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 87, Section 1391, and Title 28 United States Code Chapter 87, Section 1396.

D. STATEMENT OF CLAIM:

3. Mandamus is regarded as an extraordinary writ reserved for special situations. Among its ordinary preconditions are that the agency or official have acted (or failed to act) in disregard of a clear legal duty and that there be no adequate conventional means for review. In re Bluewater Network & Ocean Advocates, 234 F.3d 1305, 1315 (D.C. Cir. 2000); Telecomm. Research & Action Ctr. v. FCC, 750 F.2d 70, 78 (D.C. Cir. 1984). Mandamus will be granted if the Petitioner shows “(1) the presence of novel and significant questions of law; (2) the inadequacy of other available remedies; and (3) the presence of a legal issue whose resolution will aid in the administration of justice”, see In re United States, 10 F.3d 229 at 931, 933 (2d Cir. 1993).

4. Petitioner has attempted to access monies that were transferred through international bank monetary clearing systems to financial institutions located in the United States of America. The remitting party was the People’s Republic of China, People’s Bank. The remitting party designated that the transferred funds were for the sole and exclusive use and benefit of Petitioner. The foreign entity that originated the inward remittance designated Petitioner as sole and exclusive recipient for the transferred money/financial instruments.

Irrespective of efforts proffered by Petitioner and/or agents and representatives of Petitioner, private and public individuals and entities, prevent Petitioner from exercising Petitioner’s legal right to the use, transfer and unrestricted ability to freely disburse said financial assets. The acts and/or omissions to act by named and unnamed Respondents prevent Petitioner (and others who are ancillary to this cause of action) from paying their respective tax liabilities to both State and Federal taxing authorities.

5. Upon best information and belief the organizations, entities, departments and individuals that prevent and/or restrict Petitioner’s lawful access to said money and securities include but are not necessarily limited to the following:

• Secretary of the Treasury;
• Attorney General of the United States of America;
• Bank of America;
• J.P. Morgan Chase;
• CITIBANK/CITIGROUP/NYC including but not limited to Mr Charles O. Prince, CITIGROUP Chief Executive Officer;
• Goldman Sachs et al including but not limited to past and present management and executive officers and members of the Board of Directors;
• United States Department of the Treasury including but not limited to Secretary
Paulson, Deputy Secretary Kimmitt and other known and/or unknown parties working
directly or under contract with the United States Department of the Treasury;
• Secretary Chertoff, Department of Homeland Security and other known and/or
unknown parties working directly or under contract with the United States
Department of Homeland Security;
• One or more known and/or unknown “compliance officers” that act directly and/or
under contract with private bank and/or security brokerage firms to observe
rules and regulations of the United States Department of the Treasury and/or other
USG investigative and reporting entities;
• Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Virginia.

6. Upon best information and belief Respondent acts and/or failures to act constitute a
violation of the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934 (as amended in 1970), the Bank
Privacy Act and other non-specified banking regulations.

7. Reasonable action has been taken by Petitioner to obtain an explanation and/or under what authority Respondents are not permitting Petitioner to have access to the foreign transferred private business financial assets referenced herein. Despite written notice and request for a response the named parties avoid their legal obligations. In furtherance of this Petition for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus Petitioner directs this Court’s attention to the letters and other communications that have been collectively marked as Exhibits A attached hereto (2) and all of which documents, letters and Memorandum are incorporated herein by this reference as if the same were set out in their entirety in the body of this Petition.

8. The material, substantive and immediate financial loss to the Petitioner resulting from loss of financial benefit can not adequately be addressed in conventional judicial proceedings. In one more instances parties in position of knowledge, that can confirm the representations regarding interference in private business dealings, between Petitioner and third parties, have been placed at risk of physical harm by individuals representing to be fiduciaries of one or more of the Respondents. Additionally, the acts and actions of the Respondents prevent immediate payment of Federal taxes in the amount of $1.575 Trillion dollars into the United States Treasury.

E. BACKGROUND:

9. On or about April 15, 2003 the Honorable Gerald Bruce Lee, in Case Number 02-1363-A filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, issued an Order and Memorandum of Opinion for the referenced numbered case. As part of the Order and Memorandum of the Court (in the referenced case) the Court stated that the Plaintiff (in the referenced case) should pursue liquidation of corporations, recovery of financial assets and pay all required taxes in accordance with the law (3).

10. Petitioner initiated contact with numerous third parties, including United States elected, nominated, appointed and career employees plus foreign countries, for the purpose of recovering financial assets.

11. Upon best information and belief in December 2005 and January 2006, Secretary Snow (Secretary of the Treasury at the time) and Chairman Greenspan (Chairman of the Federal Reserve at the time) traveled to the People’s Republic of China. The Chinese required confirmation of Petitioner’s signature to facilitate cooperation of the Chinese in completing the transfer of financial assets referenced herein.

Upon best information and belief Snow/Greenspan determined that Chinese officials had the ability and willingness to cooperate with petitioner in the recovery and transfer of substantial financial assets that had been in the care, custody and control of the Chinese for an extended period of time.

12. Premised on the representations of Secretary Snow and Chairman Greenspan, the legal services of Troutman Sanders, LLP and Jenkens & Gilchrist Parker Chapin, LLP (attorneys) were used to complete the preparation and administer the execution of agreements and documents referred to collectively as “settlement documents”. The following is a compilation of the significant parties that are represented as either obligors and/or beneficiaries of the settlement documents:

• Petitioner Wanta identified in this petition.
• Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (including but not limited to Land Baron/Xeno).
• National Security Agency (NSA).
• Department of Homeland Security.
• Director of National Intelligence.
• United States State Department.
• United States Department of the Treasury.
• United States Department of Defense.
• The White House, including but not limited to the Offices of the President and Vice President.
• C.B.I.C. Inc. (Mr William Bonney Sr.).
• China (PRC), France, Great Britain, Germany and other foreign nations participating under one or more international “Protocol” including but not limited to the Reagan-Mitterrand Protocol agreements.
• Others of interest not intentionally omitted as part of this petition.

The entirety of the financial assets mentioned in the settlement documents prepared by the above mentioned attorneys concerns approximately $27 Trillion United States Dollars in value. The portion attributable and payable to the petitioner is $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars.

13. In May of 2006 the People’s Republic of China caused a free and unrestricted transfer of $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars through international bank fund transfer facilities to an account at Bank of America located at Richmond, Virginia. The designated beneficiary of the transferred funds from the People’s Republic of China was Petitioner herein. This transfer was made by the People’s Republic of China solely and exclusively as a requirement under the mentioned settlement agreement.

14. Upon best information and belief between the dates of July 31st to August 2nd of 2006 the United States Department of the Treasury, without authorization of either the remitting party or the receiving party removed the People’s Republic of China transferred financial assets from Bank of America Richmond, Virginia to an account in the name of Goldman Sachs at CITIBank New York, New York as the beneficiary holder of the monies transferred by the People’s Republic of China referenced above. This “Chip” (Clearing House Interbank Payment) transfer was facilitated from Virginia domiciled banks to New York domiciled banks via the Federal Reserve Bank Richmond. The Chip transfer did not remove the name of Petitioner as the intended recipient of the transferred money from the People’s Republic of China. The transfer to the Goldman Sachs et al account at CITIBank put a lawless restriction that the funds were not to be released to Petitioner without the authorization of United States Treasury. At or about the time of the unauthorized transfer mentioned in this paragraph 14 Petitioner protested the alleged right of “entitlement” by Secretary Paulson and to facilitate protest of right of ownership under the “Securities Acts” accounts were opened in the name of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. at Morgan Stanley, fiduciary client account at CITIBank/NYC to receive direct deposit transfer of Petitioner funds from Goldman Sachs.

15. The Petitioner has been contacted by “Compliance Officers” that are contract employees of the United States Department of the Treasury that the transfer records of the United States Department of the Treasury and the recipient (past and present holder of the funds transferred to Petitioner by the People’s Republic of China) reflect that the accounts opened to receive the financial assets are tagged and coded for the benefit of the Petitioner. Access to the tagged and coded accounts requires lawless authorization to be provided in writing by Secretary Paulson. To date Secretary Paulson refuses to provide the required written authorization to the compliance officers. In addition one or more compliance officer (referenced herein) has been contacted by Secret Service Agents who have advised the compliance officers that the “White House” ordered that the compliance officers cease and desist from communicating in any manner with Petitioner.

16. Upon best information and belief the compliance officers mentioned in paragraph 15 have been in contact with law enforcement officers representing the Central Intelligence Agency and the United States Department of Defense. These mentioned law enforcement officers confirm that the information provided by the compliance officers is true and correct and that upon best information and belief the “order” preventing Secretary Paulson from releasing the “tagged and coded” funds that are the sole and exclusive property of the Petitioner have been either lawlessly and individually controlled by Secretary Paulson and/or restricted through direct participation by other United States of America elected and/or nominated officials.

17. Upon best information and belief Troutman Sanders LLP and Jenkens & Gilchrist Parker Chapin LLP, seeking legal recourse on behalf of C.B.I.C. Inc. (Mr William Bonney Sr.) and the People’s Republic of China obtained an Order to Show Cause Why a Writ of Mandamus Should Not Be Issued from the United States Supreme Court signed by Justice Ginsberg. The People’s Republic of China, as a foreign government, invoked the original jurisdiction authority of the United States Supreme Court to obtain the document signed by Justice Ginsberg. Upon further best information and belief the responding parties to the action filed in the United States Supreme Court are exercising any and all assumed defenses to ward off the issuance of the Writ of Mandamus.

18. The United States Department of Justice and/or any agency or investigative authority contacted has refused to assist Petitioner in the collection of lawful funds. Said parties refuse such assistance irrespective that there is clear and undisputed evidence that the subject funds are identified in official United States government agency documents as being the sole and exclusive property of Petitioner. As of the date of the filing of this Petition, all requests for payment of lawful funds have been ignored by any and all elected and nominated public officials that have the implied and apparent authority to complete all requirements of the settled documents.

19. Petitioner individually and as sole and exclusive controlling shareholder of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. certifies as follows:

• The Petitioner has personally had conversations with one or more officials at the United States Department of the Treasury and said officials confirm the sequence of events concerning inward remittance of subject funds from the People’s Republic of China and inter-bank transfers within the United States.
• Petitioner confirms that he has personal knowledge about the “Claims and Background” set out in this Petition and verifies upon penalty of perjury that the same are true and correct.
• Petitioner has fully and completely reviewed the content of this petition and certifies by sworn affidavit attached hereto that the “Statement of Claim and Background” are true and correct.
• Upon best information and belief “Respondent” individuals, agencies, public, private, nominated and/or elected have knowingly, overtly, covertly and with specific intent conspired together to defraud Petitioner. The individual and/or conspiratorial acts amount to a violation of the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934 (as amended in 1970), the Bank Privacy Act, the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, specifically R.I.C.O. and applicable international and national money laundering restrictions. In addition it is further the mentioned Respondents’ acting individually and/or “acting in concert” violate Petitioner’s rights under the provisions of H.R. 3723 as the same pertains to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties.

Reasonable action has been taken by the Petitioner in an attempt to obtain explanation and/or under what authority Respondents are not allowing the “Rule of Law” and permitting access by Petitioner to the financial accounts referenced herein. Despite continued written notice and request for a response the named parties continue to avoid their legal obligations and continue to commit covert and/or overt acts in furtherance of their knowing and purposeful violation of the statutory references mentioned hereinabove. In furtherance of this petition for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus Petitioners direct this Court’s attention to the letters and other communications that have been marked as Exhibits A, B and C (4) attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if the same were set out in their entirety in the body of this petition.

F. CONCLUSION:

21. The “Statement of Claim and Background” demonstrate “(1) the presence of novel and significant questions of law; (2) the inadequacy of other available remedies; and (3) the presence of a legal issue whose resolution will aid in the administration of justice”.

G. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:

1. Emergency consideration of this Petition with an expedited response time for Respondents to respond to this Petition and an expedited time for the Court to hear the merits of this matter.

2. Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper to protect the Constitutionally protected rights of the Petitioner.

Executed on this 18th day of June 2007.

[Signed]
LEE E. WANTA, LEO E. WANTA, AMBASSADOR LEO WANTA _Pro_Se
5516 Falmouth Street
Suite 108
Richmond, Virginia 23230: Petitioner
Telephone: 814 455 9218
Telefax: 202 330 5116

AFFIDAVIT

The undersigned, being fully advised by counsel of the seriousness of the claim of making false statements to a Court and being fully apprised of the consequences for committing perjury (and the associated penalties), hereby make the following statements concerning the petition for Writ of Mandamus being filed on my behalf, by my counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia:

1. I am more than twenty-one years of age and I am a citizen of the United States of America.

2. For an extended period of time I am functioning as a representative, investigator, contract employee and/or facilitator of one or more assignments that were either executed and/or performed at the direction and/or under the supervision of one or more persons and/or agencies that were accountable to the Executive Offices of the United States Government

3. During most recent three to five years I have been attempting to coordinate the repatriating of substantive financial resources from foreign locations to the United States and cause the tax payments owed on the patriated funds to be paid to the United States Treasury. I have substantially completed the stated objective task with the assistance of one or more foreign sources.

4. I have read the entirety of the Petition for Writ of Mandamus prepared by my attorneys. I confirm that I have personally directed communications with the banks, security firms, the United States Department of the Treasury (including one or more individual parties associated with the Treasury that are named as Respondents) and other entities mentioned in the Petition.

5. I have personally confirmed that the financial assets sent by the People’s Republic of China were received by Bank of America in Richmond, Virginia and that upon best information and belief the subject financial assets were “tagged” in my name and transmittal instructions by the People’s Republic of China directed that the same be paid to me without offset or delay.

6. I have been personally advised by agents and/or contract regulation compliance workers, that are accountable to the United States Department of the Treasury, that release of funds sent by the People’s Republic of China for payment to me is being restricted and/or blocked by one or more parties.

7. The exact party and/or parties that are restricting and/or blocking payment of financial assets to my designated accounts is not known absolutely.

8. Upon best information and belief the United States Department of the Treasury has the power and authority to direct release of the funds for my unrestricted use.

9. Despite continued demand for release of financial assets (that were transmitted by the People’s Republic of China) for payment to me personally the demands are ignored and are not rebuked by any responsive communication.

10. I have been personally informed by parties, that have the authority to release the block on funds leveraged against recipient banking accounts established in my name, that directives have been received from known and unknown parties that have the effect of negating my ability to have free and unrestricted access to financial assets that are “tagged” solely and exclusively in my name.

IN WITNESS HEREOF I am causing the above set forth affidavit to be notarized and sworn with full recognition of the penalty of perjury this 11th day of June 2007.

[Signed]
Lee E. Wanta, Leo E. Wanta and
Ambassador Leo E. Wanta

County of [omitted here]
State of [omitted here]

On this 11th day of June 2007 the above named individual, being personally known to me, appeared before me and after being first duly sworn signed the above Affidavit.

My commission expires January 5, 2009.

[Notary signature and seal].

References and Notes [added by the Editor of International Currency Review]:

(1) Leo Wanta SAYS he received an honorary knighthood from Her Majesty The Queen. As a British subject, the Editor is entitled to designate the Ambassador as Sir Leo Wanta, reflecting his exalted status as a recognised benefactor of the United Kingdom.
(2) The Exhibits are omitted from this presentation. They consist inter alia of all the formal letters sent both directly and by the Ambassador’s Attorney Thomas Henry to the President of the United States and other senior office-holders and officials, since June 2006. Also included is the letter from the Federal Bureau of Investigation referenced in our report dated 15th May 2007.
(3) The full text of the Memorandum Opinion by Judge Gerald Bruce Lee, United States District Judge, Alexandria, Virginia, dated 15th April 2003, was published by the Editor inter alia in facsimile format in International Currency Review [ISSN 0020-6490], Volume 31, #s 3 & 4, November 2006, on pages 258-267.
(4) Taken together, this Petition and Affidavit plus the Exhibits provide the Court with comprehensive information on the illegal diversion, annexation, exploitation and leveraging of the $4.5 trillion Settlement, with the gravest implications for those involved.

LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR SIR LEO WANTA’S TAGGED $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT HIGHEST U.S. LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006, AND HAVE CONTINUED THEIR SERIAL CRIMES EVER SINCE:

The Directors and others listed in Part 1 of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and others posted on 11th June may be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious trashing of these US Statutes:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC]
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war

This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Sir Leo Wanta’s funds.

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review [ISSN 0020-6490] cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier Wantagate reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

Subscriptions to our services may be entered by pressing SUBSCRIBE against the selected publication title on this website, and following our ultra-safe coded web payment procedure.

We have no subventions apart from our subscriptions and books income, and thus cannot spend unproductive time on Internet discussions. If you would like to consider a regular consultation arrangement with the Editor on a fee-paying basis, you may care to go, in the first instance, to the Global Analysis Limited section of this website and send us details from there about your possible requirements. We have to charge for our time and cannot provide free advice on these issues.

THE WANTAGATE LISTING OF INSTITUTION DIRECTORS

INTERIM REPORT PENDING FURTHER WANTA INTELLIGENCE

Monday 11 June 2007 01:35

We are not commenting immediately on developments associated with and following the Group of Eight meeting in Germany, the continued extreme crisis surrounding the stealing of The Queen’s gold, and the heightened global tension that bedevils all pertinent international relationships at this time, arising directly from the proliferating Wantagate scandal.

We cannot comment constructively on a fast-moving situation, but it may be taken for granted that when we are able to do so, we will report accordingly. The foregoing statements should not be construed as implying ANYTHING AT ALL, other than the meaning of the words contained therein.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for ‘Wantagate’ reports since April 2006. [Note: The CLICK HERE panel is now: NEWS. A panel giving details of our latest publications has been added].

WANTAGATE: INTERNATIONAL LIST OF DIRECTORS, OFFICIALS AND OTHERS WHO MAY BE PAST OR PRESENT PARTICIPANTS IN AND/OR ACCESSORIES TO THE FACT OF GRIEVOUS NEGLIGENCE IN THE FACE OF THE SYSTEMATIC, ORCHESTRATED, ARROGANT DIVERSION, MANIPULATION, BANDITRY, EXPLOITATION, ILLEGAL AND CORRUPT HANDLING AND OTHER ABUSES OF THE ASSETS OF WHICH AMBASSADOR SIR LEO EMIL WANTA IS SOLE PRINCIPAL:

This report consists of three Parts:

1. An international list of Directors of institutions (and of officials, commissioners and others in Britain and the United States), who may be co-conspirators and Accessories to the Fact of the serial illegal diversion, exploitation and criminal misappropriation and annexation of assets that belong to Ambassador Sir Leo Emil Wanta as sole Principal. This list relates to the current phase of Wantagate, as reported by this service since April 2006, and is not yet comprehensive.

It will be added to.

It is the obligation and duty of a Director to know what is going on inside the organisation on the Board of which he sits, to put a stop to irregularities and criminality and/or to report them to the Board and to the relevant authorities.

2. The international list of financial institutions assets belonging to the Ambassador as sole Principal as of 7th July 1993, as previously published on this website and in our financial journal, International Currency Review [Volume 31, #3 & 4, 2006].

This bank list covers institutions holding financial assets belonging to the Ambassador when he was ‘taken down’ by the criminalists, in an operation orchestrated by the White House to this day. Since Wantagate is now bedevilling international relations all over the world and has assumed the proportions of an unprecedented global crisis, it is appropriate to remind everyone of the far-reaching global spread of this list of Wanta institutions.

3. The list of US Statutes of which the perpetrators of crimes against Ambassador Sir Leo Wanta are in breach, as published in successive postings in this Wantagate series.

WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
NOTICE: The Editor is taking sharp steps on 12th June 2007, the date on which his loan is due for repayment, to escalate the ‘Wisconsin dimension’ of the Wantagate crisis, as he is in a position to prove that fraud has been perpetrated against him given that the Case Number referred to in the Escrow Agreement covering his loan as prepared by Attorney Steven Goodwin is the same Case Number referenced in the covering letter dated 12th June 1992 from one of the Ambassador’s earlier lawyers to the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue enclosing a cheque being the second ‘nuisance’ payment by the Ambassador of $14,129 in settlement of the illegal civil tax assessment against him. [For the Wisconsin Taxation Gestapo background, see Archive, report dated 20th March 2006]. Secondly, the Editor of International Currency Review has a copy of the certified Satisfaction of Delinquent Tax Warrant dated 1st June 1993 referencing the Wisconsin Department of Revenue’s Tax Code for the Ambassador.

Any remaining malevolent spectators will be disappointed to learn that the Editor will NOT be suing the Ambassador, who was NOT of course responsible for this long-range fraud against him, but will be directing the attention of the relevant authorities to those who are parties to this fraud. The Editor, the Ambassador and Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., are satisfied that the fraud against this Editor was a deliberate ‘bait and switch’ operation, designed to set this British Editor against the Ambassador. This will not happen, no doubt to the chagrin of the cynical handlers involved. One day these arrogant, devious operatives may finally wake up to the discovery that their habitual duplicity and subterfuge is liable to boomerang and to prove counter-productive.

TELL-TALE DEFENSIVE COMMENTS BY GOLDMAN SACHS CHIEF
By way of introduction, read the following comments by Mr Lloyd C Blankfein, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Goldman Sachs, published in The New York Times, Sunday, 10th June 2007:

‘If you take an historical perspective, clients want us to do what clients have always wanted their bankers to do…’.

Excuse us? Goldman Sachs, a broker-dealer, ‘is not really a bank’ [UK-based Goldman Sachs Compliance Officer to this Editor in 2006]. Mr Blankfein continued: ‘… Give good advice and provide them with the financial means with which to be able to act… We’ve come full circle, because this is exactly what the Rothschilds or J P Morgan the banker were doing in their heyday. What caused the aberration was the Glass-Steagall Act’ – which, being interpreted, means that Mr Lloyd C Blankfein might prefer to go back to the free-for-all, rip-off days before the US securities regulations took effect: hence the former Goldman Sachs Chairman Henry Paulson’s recent waffle, for public consumption, about his preference for a ‘principles-based’ system.

Woolly principles are of course no substitute for enforceable securities regulations, but such a system sure would ‘legitimise’, in theory at least, the kinds of criminal financing operations that have been the subject of our reports up to this anniversary of the Wanta Plan Settlement accord.

So what these operatives are driving at is that the insistence by Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., the Executive Vice President and Treasurer of Ambassador Wanta’s AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., upon the full application and implementation of ALL the stringent US securities regulations, which the US Securities and Exchange Commission is failing to enforce [see below], gets in their craw.

Fancy Mr Blankfein representing that Goldman Sachs, which is not a bank, acts like a bank – thereby implying that he would prefer that his institution became a bank, where controls (especially in the United States) are far less stringent than in the securities market context. What kind of signal does this message send to his firm’s clients?

Mr Blankfein elaborated in his New York Times coverage:

‘In the space of five years, we went from being a firm with a small balance sheet which was considered to be too advice-oriented and lacking of financial muscle, to be taken seriously – to an organisation which generates articles with headlines like:

‘TOO BIG? TOO POWERFUL? TOO BAD’.

This extraordinary admission, especially the last two words, suggests that Mr Blankfein’s approach to the bind that his institution finds itself in, given the background that we have reported on this website, is that ‘attack is the best form of defence’.

One imagines that his reportedly huge remuneration package has had nothing whatsoever to do with Goldman Sachs’ exploitation of Ambassador Wanta’s $4.5 trillion Settlement funds, over which the broker-dealer’s former Chairman, Henry ‘Conflict-of-Interest’ M. Paulson, has retained sole signatory authority. Is Mr Blankfein by any chance nervous about what lies in store?

Moreover, what was the point he was making in this following further comment: ‘I haven’t felt this good since July 1998’. In August 1998, the Russian rouble crashed along with the Russian financial economy. Now why, exactly, could this former Goldman Sachs gold salesman be anticipating a similar calamity in the United States?

Could his comments by any chance have anything to do with the need, as he may see it, to ensure that Goldman Sachs does not get blamed for the coming crash which, if it occurs, will be 100% attributable to his own institution’s interference with the Wanta Plan, which will refinance and rehabilitate the US and world financial economies – ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’, to quote Her Majesty the Queen?

PART 1: LIST OF DIRECTORS AND RELEVANT OFFICIALS AND OTHERS:
The following is a list of Directors of financial institutions, elected and appointed US and UK officials, Commissioners and others, who may have variously allowed, condoned, accommodated, or whose institutions may have actively participated in, and may continue to participate in, criminal and illegal fiat money financial transactions exploiting the $4.5 trillion compromise financial Settlement agreed for Ambassador Wanta in May and June 2006 and/or circumstances arising therefrom. Typically, this Settlement was negotiated by the duplicitous US intelligence crooks concerned, in bad faith; but the agreement is binding on all parties and has to be implemented. At the very least, each individual listed here may be an Accessory to the Fact of some or all of the felonies under US law listed in Part 3 of this presentation. Many may have been or may be co-conspirators. All the Directors of the World Bank are included, given that, as with all Directors in any context, it is their responsibility to see to it that the institution on the Board of which they serve does not engage in dubious, ethically improper and/or illegal and criminal activities, including the diversion and exploitation of assets belonging to others. Since there is no excuse in law for ignorance of the law – even in the international environment where the Rule of Law has been replaced by the Law of the Jungle – those Directors and others listed here who may profess to be ignorant of the scandalous exploitation of Ambassador Wanta’s underlying $27.5+ trillion of assets held in his USC Title 18, Section 6 corporations’ bank accounts, and/or of transactions derived from Ambassador Wanta’s $4.5 trillion Settlement funds, cannot sustain any such defence for their inaction in failing to take steps to have criminal transnational financial abuses stopped, and those responsible reported and brought before relevant Courts of Law*.

Aass, Svein, Executive Director, Norway, World Bank
Alkhalifa, Abdulhamid, Alternative Director, Saudi Arabia, World Bank
Almofahdi, Abdulrahman M, Executive Director, Saudi Arabia, World Bank
Alzetta, Gino, Executive Director, Belgium, World Bank
Amr, Mohamed Kamel, Alternative Director, Egypt, World Bank
Armstrong, C Michael, Director, Citigroup Inc.
Arshad, Nursiah, Alternative Director, Malaysia, World Bank
Atkins, Paul S, Commissioner, US Securities and Exchange Commission
Baker, James A, III, former Treasury Secretary and Secretary of State
Baker, John D., II, Director, Wachovia
Barber, Brendan Paul, Member, Bank of England Court of Directors
Barnet, William, III, Director, Bank of America
Barrett, Mathew W, Chairman Barclays Capital
Belda, Alain J P, Director, Citigroup Inc.
Bernanke, Ben S, Chairman, Federal Reserve Board, Director, Bank for International Settlements
Bernasconi, Francisco, Alternative Director, Chile, World Bank
Biggs, John H, Board Member, JPMorganChase
Blair, Anthony, British Prime Minister
Blankfein, Lloyd C, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Goldman Sachs
Bodman, Secretary Samuel P, US Cabinet Member
Borsig, Dr Clemens, Chairman, Deutsche Bank Supervisory Board
Botero, Jorge Humberto, Alternative Director, Colombia, World Bank
Bowles, Randall C, Board Member, JPMorganChase
Bramble, Frank P, Sr., Director, Bank of America
Brown, Kevin M, Acting US Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Briault, Clive, Member of the Board of the UK Financial Services Authority
Browning, Peter C, Director, Wachovia
Bryan, John H, Director, Goldman Sachs
Burke, Stephen B, Board Member, JPMorganChase
Bush, George W, Jr, President of the United States
Butler, The Rt Hon Lord of Brockwell, KB, GCB, CVO, Director, HSBC
Camarasa, Felix Alberto, Executive Director, Argentina, World Bank
Campos, Roel C, Commissioner, US Securities and Exchange Commission
Canuto, Otaviano, Executive Director, Brazil, World Bank
Cardona, Michel, Paris, Alternate Director, Bank for International Settlements
Carioso, Giovanni, Rome, Alternate Director, Bank for International Settlements
Casey, Kathleen L, Commissioner, US Securities and Exchange Commission
Casteen, John T, III, Director, Wachovia
Chao, Secretary Elaine, US Cabinet Member
Cheney, Richard B, Vice President of the United States
Chertoff, Michael, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, US Cabinet Member
Choi, Joong-Kyung, Executive Director, South Korea, World Bank
Ciocca, Pierluigi, Rome, Director, Bank for International Settlements
Clinton, William Jefferson, former President of the United States, CIA operative
Clinton, Senator Hillary, wife of William Jefferson Clinton, CIA operative
Cohn, Gary D, President and CEO, Goldman Sachs
Collins, John T, Director, Bank of America
Coombe, J D, Director, HSBC
Countryman, Gary L, Director, Bank of America
Cox, Christopher, Chairman, US Securities and Exchange Commission
Crosby, Sir James, Member of the Board of the UK Financial Services Authority
Crowen, James A, Board Member, JPMorganChase
Dahlback, Claes, Director, Goldman Sachs
Davies, Mervyn, CBE, Chairman, Standard Chartered
Debevoise, E Whitney, Executive Director, World Bank
Del Missier, Jerry, Co-President, Barclays Capital
DeNoma, Mike, Sands, Peter, Executive Director, Standard Chartered
Deraman, Mat Aron, Executive Director, Malaysia, World Bank
Derr, Kenneth J, Director, Citigroup Inc.
Deutch, John M, Director, Citigroup Inc.
Deutscher, Eckhard, Executive Director, Germany, World Bank
Dias, Agapito Mendes, Alternative Director, Sao Tome and Principe, World Bank
Dib, Sid Ahmed, Alternative Director, Algeria, World Bank
Dimon, James, Chairman and CEO, JPMorgan Chase
Dodge, David, Ottawa, Director, Bank for International Settlements
Doltu, Claudiu, Alternative Director, Romania, World Bank
Draghi, Mario, Rome, Director, Bank for International Settlements
Duquesne, Pierre, Executive Director, France, World Bank
Dynn, The Baroness, DBE, Deputy Chairman, senior non-executive Director, HSBC
Eick, Dr Karl-Gerhard, Member, Deutsche Bank Supervisory Board
Engan, Laura J, Deputy Secretary, Wisconsin Department of Revenue
Ervin, Roger M, Secretary, Wisconsin Department of Revenue
Fabritius, Dr Hans Georg, Member of Deutsche Bundesbank Executive Board
Fairhead, R A, Director, HSBC
Familiar, Jorge, Executive Director, Mexico, World Bank
Fawcett, Amelia Chilcott, CBE, Member, Bank of England Court of Directors
Fisher, Paul, London, Alternate Director, Bank for International Settlements
Fisher, Peter, Member of the Board of the UK Financial Services Authority
Flanagan, Brian, Member of the Board of the UK Financial Services Authority
Flint, D J, CBE, Group Finance Director, HSBC
Forseke, Karin, Member of the Board of the UK Financial Services Authority
Forster, Heldrun, Member, Deutsche Bank Supervisory Board
Franks, Tommy R, Director, Bank of America
Francis, Mary Elizabeth, CBE, LVO, Member, Bank of England Court of Directors
Frazier, Gregg T, Chief, Central Audit Section, Wisconsin Department of Revenue
Friedman, Stephen, Director, Goldman Sachs
Fukui, Toshihiko, Tokyo, Director, Bank for International Settlements
Fulton, Paul, Director, Bank of America
Fung, W K L, OBE, Director, HSBC
Galea, Robert, Director, Wachovia
Gates, Robert M, US Secretary of Defense, US Cabinet Member
Geithner, Timothy F, New York, Director, Bank for International Settlements
Geoghegan, M F, CBE, Group Chief Executive, HSBC
George, J Russell, US Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration
George, William W, Director, Goldman Sachs
Gieve, Sir John, CB, Deputy Governor, Bank of England
Gifford, Charles K, Director, Bank of America
Gitt, Jerry, Director, Wachovia
Gonzales, Alberto, US Attorney General, US Cabinet Member
Goodwin, William H., Jr, Director, Wachovia
Gray, William H, III, Board Member, JPMorganChase
Green, S K, Group Chairman, HSBC
Gupta, Rajat K, Director, Goldman Sachs
Gutierrez, Secretary Carlos, US Cabinet Member
Hall, Sir Graham Joseph, Member, Bank of England Court of Directors
Hartmann, Ulrich, Member, Deutsche Bank Supervisory Board
Hasan, Merza H, Executive Director, Kuwait, World Bank
Herringer, Maryellen C, Director, Wachovia
Hertzberg, Gerd, Member, Deutsche Bank Supervisory Board
Heyden, General Michael, Director of Central Intelligence
Horn, Sabine, Member, Deutsche Bank Supervisory Board
Hosomi, Makoto, Executive Director, Japan, World Bank
Hughes-Hallett, J W J, Director, HSBC
Hunck, Rolf, Member, Deutsche Bank Supervisory Board
Hutton, Dame Deidre, CBE, Member of the Board, UK Financial Services Authority
Ingram, Robert A, Director, Wachovia
Ingves, Stefan, Stockholm, Director, Bank for International Settlements
Jackson, Laban P, Jr, Board Member, JPMorganChase
Jackson, Secretary Alfonso, US Cabinet Member
James, Donald M, Director, Wachovia
Jay, The Hon Peter, Member, Bank of England Court of Directors
Jenkins, Roger, Head, Barclays Private Equity, senior Barclays Capital official
Job, Sir Peter, London, Member, Deutsche Bank Supervisory Board
Johanns, Secretary Mike, US Cabinet Member
Johnson, James A, Director, Goldman Sachs
Johnson, Karen H, Washington, Alternate Director, Bank for International Settlements
Jones, W Steven, Director, Bank of America
Juliber, Lois D, Director, Goldman Sachs
Kagermann, Professor Dr Henning, Member, Deutsche Bank Supervisory Board
Kariniemi, Pauli, Alternative Director, Finland, World Bank
Karnowski, Jakob, Alternative Director, Poland, World Bank
Katafias, William, Senior Vice President, Wachovia
Kaufmann, Ulrich, Member, Deutsche Bank Supervisory Board
Kazmierczak, Peter, Member, Deutsche Bank Supervisory Board
Kempthorne, Secretary Dirk, US Cabinet Member
Kenmire, David, Member of the Board of the UK Financial Services Authority
Kessler, John W, Board Member, JPMorganChase
Ketseal, Mulu, Executive Director, Ethiopia, World Bank
Khan, Zakir Ahmed, Alternative Director, Bangladesh, World Bank
Kimmitt, Robert M, Deputy Secretary, US Treasury
King, Mervyn Allister, Governor, Bank of England, Director, Bank for International Settlements
Kleinfeld, Klaus, Director, Citigroup Inc.
Kotz, Professor Hans-Helmut, Member of Deutsche Bundesbank Executive Board
Kumar, Dhanendra, Executive Director, India, World Bank
Kvalheim, Grant, Co-President, Barclays Capital
Kvasov, Alexey G, Executive Director, Russian Federation, World Bank
Laundau, Jean-Pierre, Paris, Director, Bank for International Settlements
Leavitt, Secretary Michael O, US Cabinet Member
Levy, Maurice, Member, Deutsche Bank Supervisory Board
Lewis, Kenneth J, Chairman, CEO and President, Bank of America
Lightbourne, Ishmael, Alternative Director, Bahamas, World Bank
Likierman, Professor Sir John Andrew, Member, Bank of England Court of Directors
Lipp, Robert I, Board Member, JPMorganChase
Liveris, Andrew N, Director, Citigroup Inc.
Lomax, Rachel, Deputy Governor, Bank of England
Lozano, Monica C, Director, Bank of America
Manoogian, Richard A, Board Member, JPMorganChase
Mark, Henriette, Member, Deutsche Bank Supervisory Board
Massey, Walter E, Director, Bank of America
May, Thomas J, Director, Bank of America
McCarthy, Sir Callum, Chairman, Financial Services Authority, Member, Bank of England Court of Directors
McDonald, Mackey J, Director, Wachovia
Meddings, Richard, Sands, Peter, Executive Director, Standard Chartered
Mesiter, Dr Edgar, Member of Deutsche Bundesbank Executive Board
Miagkov, Eugene, Alternative Director, Russian Federation, World Bank
Miles, Professor David, Member of the Board of the UK Financial Services Authority
Mitchell, Patricia E, Director, Bank of America
Moffatt, Sir Brian, OBE, Deputy Chairman, HSBC
Moody-Stuart, Sir Mark, KCMG, Director, HSBC
Mordasini, Michel, Executive Director, Switzerland, World Bank
Morgan, G, Director, HSBC
Morke, Wolfgang, Frankfurt am Main, Alternate Director, Bank for International Settlements
Morrice, Robert, Chairman and Chief Executive, Asia pacific, Barclays Capital
Mulcahy, Anne, Director, Citigroup Inc.
Myners, Paul, Member, Bank of England Court of Directors
Nargolwala, Kai, Sands, Peter, Executive Director, Standard Chartered
Nazareth, Annete L, Commissioner, US Securities and Exchange Commission
Negroponte, John, former Director of Central Intelligence, Deputy Secretary of State
Nemli, Melih, Alternative Director, Turkey, World Bank
Neubauer, Joseph, Director, Wachovia
Newton, S W, Director, HSBC
Nicholson, Secretary Jim, US Cabinet Member
Novak, David C, Board Member, JPMorganChase
O’Brien, Terry, Alternative Director, Australia, World Bank
Parker, Sir Thomas John, Member, Bank of England Court of Directors
Parsons, Richard D, Director, Citigroup Inc.
Paulson, Henry M, Secretary, US Treasury
Peters, Secretary Mary E, US Cabinet Member
Pinto, Nuno Mota, Alternative Director, Portugal, World Bank
Platscher, Gabriele, Member, Deutsche Bank Supervisory Board
Praet, Peter, Alternate Director, Bank for International Settlements
Prince, Charles, Chairman and CEO, Citigroup Inc.
Proctor, Timothy D, Director, Wachovia
Potter, Dr David Edwin, CBE, Member, Bank of England Court of Directors
Quaden, Guy, Brussels, Director, Bank for International Settlements
Rabbatts, Heather Victoria, CBE, Member, Bank of England Court of Directors
Rady, Ernest, Director, Wachovia
Ramirez, Jose Alejandro Rojas, Alternative Director, Venezuela, World Bank
Ramirez, Robert Hernandez,
Raymond, Lee R, Board Member, JPMorganChase
Reckers, Dr Hans, Member of Deutsche Bundesbank Executive Board
Remsperger, Professor Hermann, Member of Deutsche Bundesbank Executive Board
Rhind, Professor David William, CBE, FRS, FBA, Member, Bank of England Court of Directors
Ricci, Rich, CEO, Barclays Capital
Rice, Condoleeza, US Secretary of State, US Cabinet Member
Richey, Van L, Director, Wachovia
Robert E Diamond, Jr., President, Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank PLC
Robertson, S M, Director, HSBC
Rodin, Judith, Director, Citigroup Inc.
Rogers, John F W, Director, Goldman Sachs
Roth, Jean-Pierre, Chairman, Bank for International Settlements
Rubin, Robert E, Chairman of Executive Committee, Citigroup Inc.
Ruck, Karin, Member, Deutsche Bank Supervisory Board
Ryan, Thomas M, Director, Bank of America
Sands, Peter, Executive Director, Standard Chartered
Sarin, Alun, Member, Bank of England Court of Directors
Scholar, Tom, Executive Director, UK, World Bank
Seng, Louis Philippe, Ong, Executive Director, Mauritius, World Bank
Shah, Shuja, Executive Director, Pakistan, World Bank
Shaw, Ruth G, Director, Wachovia
Sigert, Dr Theo, Member, Deutsche Bank Supervisory Board
Simmons, Ruth J, Director, Goldman Sachs
Sinamenye, Mathias, Alternative Director, Burundi, World Bank
Slack, Michael, Member of the Board of the UK Financial Services Authority
Sloan, O Temple, Jr, Director, Bank of America
Smith, Lanty L, Director, Wachovia
Spangler, Meredith R, Director, Bank of America
Spellings, Secretary Margaret, US Cabinet Member
Strachan, James Murray, Member, Bank of England Court of Directors
Stark, Professor Jurgen, Vice-President, Deutsche Bundesbank
Stevenson, Hugh, Member of the Board of the UK Financial Services Authority
Strauss-Kahn, Marc-Olivier, Alternate Director, Bank for International Settlements
Thomas, Franklin A, Director, Citigroup Inc.
Thompson, Ken, Chairman and CEO, Wachovia
Tietmeyer, Hans, Frankfurt am Main, Vice-Chairman, Bank for International Settlements
Tillman, Robert L, Director, Bank of America
Tiner, John, Chief Executive, UK Financial Services Authority
Todenhofer, Tilman, Member, Deutsche Bank Supervisory Board
Tucker, Paul, London, Alternate Director, Bank for International Settlements
Verplaetse, Alfons Vicomte, Brussels, Director, Bank for International Settlements
Visco, Ignazio, Rome, Alternate Director, Bank for International Settlements
Von Pierer, Professor Dr. jur Dr.-ing. E.h. Heinrich, Member, Deutsche Bank Supervisory Board
Ward, Jackie M, Director, Bank of America
Watson, Samy, Executive Director, Canada, World Bank
Weber, Axel A, Frankfurt am Main, Director, Bank for International Settlements
Weber, Dipl.-ing. Dr.-ing. E. h. Jurgen, Member, Deutsche Bank Supervisory Board
Weber, Professor Axel A, President, Deutsche Bundesbank
Weldon, William C, Board Member, JPMorganChase
Wellink, Nout H E M, Amsterdam, Director, Bank for International Settlements
Whitaker, John C, Jr, Director, Wachovia
Wigley, Robert Charles Michael, Member, Bank of England Court of Directors
Wijffels, Herman, Executive Director, Netherlands, World Bank
Wilkinson, Geoffrey Charles George, Member, Bank of England Court of Directors
Wilkinson, Jim, Chief of Staff, US Treasury
Williamson, Sir Brian, CBE, Director, HSBC
Winkelried, President and CEO
Wolfowitz, Paul, President (to end-June 2007), United States, World Bank
Wunderlich, Leo, Member, Deutsche Bank Supervisory Board,
Yang, Jinlin, Alternative Director, World Bank
Young, Dona Davis, Director, Wachovia
Zeitler, Professor Franz-Christoph, Vice-President, Deutsche Bundesbank
Zou, Jiayi, Executive Director, China, World Bank

* Sources: Websites monitored on 30th May 2007 of: Bank for International Settlements; Bank of America; Bank of England; Barclays Bank Plc; Barclays Capital; Citigroup, Inc; Deutsche Bank;
Federal Reserve Board; Financial Services Authority; Goldman Sachs; HSBC; JPMorganChase; Securities and Exchange Commission; Standard Chartered; US Treasury; Wachovia Corporation;
World Bank (Alternative Directors are included because the appellation ‘Alternative’ does not absolve them from their responsibilities as Directors of the World Bank; Identities of the countries they represent are shown, except that details of World Bank constituencies are omitted).

Note A: The terms of some Members of the Court of Directors of the Bank of England expired on 31st May 2007. Note B: Many of the names listed are Directors of other entities. In this list, we show only their Directorships of the institutions or organisations pertinent to this presentation. Data current as posted, as of 30th May 2007.

PART 2: REPEAT OF OUR LIST OF INSTITUTIONS HOLDING WANTA ASSETS IN JULY 1993:
Repeat of our published list of financial institutions holding Wanta assets as at 7th July 1993, when the Ambassador was illegally seized and ‘taken out’ so that the criminal operatives and their co-conspiring financial institutions and their corrupt US intelligence community collaborators and intermediaries could exploit the Wanta accounts without (so they rashly assumed) any likelihood of their criminal actions being exposed. In order to ‘legitimise’ this open-ended financial criminality, the Central Intelligence Agency lie factory disseminated the lie that Ambassador Sir Leo Wanta was dead. When he ceased to be dead on 21st July 2005, the Agency, which cannot tell the difference between lies and the truth, realised that it had been caught ‘in flagrante’, and all the CIA’s dirty lies and disinformation about Sir Leo Emil Wanta, including the muck-raking lies in CIA hack operative Claire Sterling’s ‘Thieves’ World’, were immediately discredited. The CIA had egg on its face, as did all the corrupt banks which had been playing with the Ambassador’s funds.

Some ‘Useful Idiots’ in the US financial community and among the CIA’s paid deceivers are still spouting these old lies to this day. The list of banks holding Wanta assets in July 1993 and which the Ambassador, hoping to save the international financial system from collapse, has refrained from ordering to repatriate his funds in the aggregate amount of $27.5+ trillion that they held in July 1993, is as follows:

AB Invest [Avenue Banque]
ABN-AMRO Bank N.V., Amsterdam,
Agape Holdings, Ltd, Barbados
Agricultural Bank of China
Algemene Spaar-en Lufrentenkas
Algemene Spaar-en Lufrentenkas/ASLK Bank
Altalanos Eriekforgalmi Bank Rt (AEB RT)
Amsouth Bank, N.A
Amur Commercial Bank, Moscow
Anglo Manx Bank Limited
Arab Jordan Investment Bank
Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Limited, Melbourne
Bacob Savings Bank, Borgerhout, Belgium
Banca di Roma, Rome
Banca Nazionale del Lavoro
Banco Ambrosiano Veneto
Banco Espanol de Credito, S.A., Madrid
Banco Espirito Santo e Comerciale de Lisboa, Lisbon
Banco Exterior de Espana, Madrid
Banco Hispano Americano
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas
Bank ‘UKRAINA’, Kiev, Ukraine
Bank Bruxelles Lambert
Bank Crozier Limited, Grenada [closed down, money stolen]
Bank Dumesnil, Geneva
Bank for Foreign Economic Affairs of the USSR, Moscow
Bank of America
Bank of America International, New York
Bank of America, Milan
Bank of America, Newport Beach, CA
Bank of America, Vienna, Austria
Bank of China
Bank of New York, New York
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd, Tokyo
Bank Union de Crédit
Bankers Trust GmbH, Frankfurt
Banque Nationale de Paris
Banque Paribas (Luxembourg) S.A
Banque SCS ALLIANCE Geneva
Banque Suisse de Crédit et de Dépôts, Zürich
Barclays Bank, Hanover Square, London
CBI-TDB Union Bancaire Privée, Geneva
Chase Manhattan Bank N.A., London,
Chase Manhattan Bank, Milan
Chase Manhattan Bank, New York
Chase Manhattan Bank, Vienna
Chemical Bank of New York
Citibank – Frankfurt
Citibank – Geneva
Citibank – Los Angeles
Citibank – Milan
Citibank – New York
Citibank – Singapore
Citibank – Tokyo
Citibank – Vienna, Austria
Citibank, N.A., Philippines
Citicorp/Citibank
Citicorp/Citibank, London, Painewebber, Inc
Clydesdale Bank Plc
Commercial Bank ‘Moldova-Agroindbank’, S.A., Kishinev
Coutts Bank (Switzerland) Ltd
Coutts Bank, London
Crédit Lynonnais Bank Nederland NV, Amsterdam
Crédit Suisse Bank
Crédit Suisse Bank, Geneva
Crédit Suisse Bank, Lausanne
Crédit Suisse First Boston, Zürich
Credobank (Commercial Bank)
DBS Bank/Development Bank of Singapore: This bank was closed down by the Singapore authorities and $70 billion belonging to/controlled by Ambassador Wanta was stolen in the process.
Dean Witter Reynolds
Den Norske Bank AS, Oslo
Deutsche Bank, Düsseldorf
Dresdner Bank, Frankfurt
Faroe Investments
FIDENAS AG, Zürich, Switzerland
Générale de Banque
Gosbank, USSR
Handels Bank AG, Zürich
Handelsbank Natwest, Zürich
Hansabank, Talinn, Estonia
Joint Stock Bank ‘Kazkommertsbank’, Almaty
Jugobanka D.D
Lloyds Bank Plc
Lloyds Bank Plc, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire
[Wanta funds placed in the personal name of his former Attorney Jan Morton Heger]
Manufacturers Hanover Corporation/Mantrust
Marshall and Ilsley Bank
Merita Bank, Helsinki
Merrill Lynch Inc
Midland Bank Plc, London
Morgan Guaranty & Trust Bank, New York
Morgan Stanley and Co, New York
Morgan Stanley Asia Ltd, Hong Kong
Moscow Cooperative Bank ‘Partner’ Bank
Moscow Narodny Bank Ltd, Singapore
Mosstrolbank, AmeriTrust Corporation Inc.
National Bank for Foreign Economic Activity of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent,
National Westminster Bank
National Westminster Bank of New Jersey
National Westminster Bank Plc., Herne Bay, Kent
Nomura Singapore Limited
Nordbanken AB, Stockholm
Northern Trust International Banking Corporation
Norwest Bank, N.A
Ost-West Handelsbank, Frankfurt
Painewebber, Inc
Paribas (Suisse) S.A., Geneva
Philadelphia International Bank
Prudential Securities, New York
Raffeisen Zentralbank Osterreich, Vienna
Raffeisenbank Appenzell
Rafffeisen Zentralbank Osterreich AG [RBZ], Singapore
Relvnesheconombank, Minsk
Rigas Komerc Banka, Riga, Latvia
Royal Bank of Scotland Plc
Royal Trust Bank
Sanwa Bank Limited
Sanwa Bank Lt, Düsseldorf
Schweizerische Bankgesellshaft /Union Bank of Switzerland
Security Pacific Asia Bank, Ltd
Shearson Lehman Hutton Inc., Denver
Société Générale, Paris
Société Générale, Riga, Latvia
Southwest Securities, Inc
Standard Chartered Bank, Philippines
State Bank for Foreign Economic Affairs for Turkmenistan
Status-Credit Bank, Moscow
Swiss Banking Corporation
Swiss Volksbank, Zürich
Texas Commerce Bank, Dallas
Toronto Dominion Bank
Unibank A.S., Copenhagen
Union Bank of Switzerland, Geneva
Union Bank of Switzerland, Zürich
Vilniaus Bank AS, AB, Vilnius, Lithuania
Volksbank, Bonn, Germany
Volksbank, Offerdingen, Germany
Westdeutsche Landesbank, Düsseldorf, Germany
Zentralsparkasse und Kommerzialbank, Vienna.

*Self-evidently, some of these institutions have since been absorbed into other institutions, have been rebranded, or have otherwise become successor organisations since Sir Leo Wanta was illegally ‘taken down’ 1993. The successor organisations are responsible for the Wanta Title 18, Section 6 corporate accounts and the assets they contain, inherited from the institutions that merged with them. Comprehensive details and facsimiles of the ACTUAL TRANSACTIONS, BANK ACCOUNTS AND COORDINATES, were published in International Currency Review, Volume 31, 3/4 [December 2006]. See www.worldreports.org for subscription information.

PART 3: LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR SIR LEO WANTA’S TAGGED $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT HIGHEST LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006, AND HAVE CONTINUED THEIR SERIAL CRIMES EVER SINCE:

The Directors and others listed in Part 1 of this presentation may be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious trashing of these US Statutes:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC]
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war

This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Ambassador Wanta’s funds.

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or the earlier Wanta Crisis reports. We are a private intelligence publishing house. Subscriptions to our services may be entered by pressing SUBSCRIBE against the selected publication title, and following the ultra-safe web payment procedure. We have no subventions apart from our subscriptions and books income, and cannot spend unproductive time on Internet discussions. If you would like to enter into formal consultation arrangements with the Editor on a fee-paying basis, you need to go, in the first instance, to the Global Analysis Limited section of this website and send us details about your requirements. We charge for our time and cannot provide free advice on any of these issues.

This has been a straightforward business operation since 1963, and has nothing to do with any outside sponsorship. All suggestions to the contrary are actionable for libel in the English Court.

THE RULE OF LAW VS. THE RULE OF THE JUNGLE

U.S. NAZIS STEAL THE QUEEN’S LIENED GOLD ASSETS

Sunday 13 May 2007 20:11

UPDATE #1, 14 MAY 2007: This report was ‘snipped’ this morning by NSA at the following paragraph:

The Editor became aware of this latest avalanche of lies about eight days ago, and enquired as to its purpose. Among the informed answers he has received to this question is the following:

‘The crooks can’t admit that the Ambassador exists because the moment they do this, they are either dead, or in jail’.

The text was ‘snipped’ at the word ‘crooks’. It has been restored at 4.10pm London time.

By ‘snipping’ our text (which is ILLEGAL) at this point, the criminal operatives have revealed that we have touched on a sore spot, the implication of which is plain (Luciferian trade secrets).

We were simply quoting, accurately, what we were told.

The above quote was (and is) followed by our sentence which now reads:

How fascinating, then, that President George W. Bush Jr. addressed Leo as ‘Dear Ambassador Leo’, in the letter that we publicised here on 1st May, thus acknowledging the Ambassador’s existence!

UPDATE #2, 14 MAY 2007: Notwithstanding that we restored the snipped text noted above, the NSA later proceeded to snip more of this text, chopping the final paragraph of the ‘Goldman Sachs’ text below (HYPOCRISY CORNER) and the whole of the sections below headed NEW AGENCY TRASHING CAMPAIGN AGAINST US, WARNING TO THE AGENCY’S AOL OPERATION, UTTERING THREATS IS A CRIME IN THE UNITED KINGDOM, and our usual LAWS BREACHED BY THE HIGH-LEVEL U.S. CRIMINAL OPERATIVES.

Our IT experts are tracing the original source of this interference with our website and we will take legal advice with a view to initiating appropriate legal proceedings in the UK.

AFTERMATH OF THE U.S. ‘ACT OF WAR’ AGAINST GREAT BRITAIN

WANTAGATE UPDATE

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for ‘Wantagate’ reports since April 2006. [Note: The CLICK HERE panel is now: NEWS. A panel giving details of our latest publications has been added].

WARNING: This report contains FACTS. In the unlikely event that you prefer FANTASY, please don’t bother to read this analysis, but rely instead on your ‘sidestream’ newspaper or your propaganda radio station of preference. And do not, please, shoot your humble messenger. See our ARCHIVE reports dated 1st, 4th and 5th May 2007, and 12th October 2005, for background.

THE FURIOUS AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE WAKING UP
The American people appear with good reason to be extremely angry, but at the same time half asleep. Being angry in a dream is a most unpleasant experience, as well as being disturbing to the psyche. But waking up to the realisation that their males are being killed in an illegal war, along with over a million Iraqis, for no reason other than the self-enrichment of the criminals who have hijacked their Government, has been a millennial shock for many now furious Americans.

Equally angry is this Brit, who, though an honorary American, has been obliged by certain special circumstances – and by the honour of assisting as great a US patriot and intellect as Ambassador Leo Wanta – to warn, almost in ‘real time’, that the Nazi and Zionazi criminal intelligence operatives who have been scamming and ruining the United States for a generation, are DESPERATE MEN.

Their current desperation is a DIRECT AND SPECIFIC CONSEQUENCE OF OUR EXPOSURES OF THEIR SERIAL FINANCIAL CRIMES IN OUR PUBLICATIONS AND ON THIS WEBSITE.

Desperate crooks, driven by the demons inside their criminal minds, are liable to do desperate things. Consider the observable situation during the weekend of 12th-13th May 2007:

• Paul Wolfowitz, President of the World Bank and probable war criminal, having been instructed by the World Bank Board to submit his resignation, had thumbed his nose at the Bank’s Board, and was evidently still refusing to budge.

As a consequence, there are well authenticated reports of seething discontent within the ranks of this tax-free organisation which, under both of its Wolves (Wolfensohn and Wolfowitz), has been illegally exploiting and diverting Ambassador Leo Wanta’s funds without his permission, under cover of the CIA’s lie that the Ambassador was ‘long since dead’, and impervious to the fact that, with effect from 21st July 2005, the Ambassador ceased to be dead.

It is known that certain honourable senior Bank staff members are so exasperated and disgusted with the World Bank’s corruption using the Wanta assets under these two operatives, that they are looking to have the Bank’s entire can of financial worms exposed, and would even be willing to see the World Bank closed down.

• The corrupt British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, though effectively sacked by The Queen for having lied to Her Majesty (and not only for this reason), was engaged in a cynically choreographed, and evidently unconstitutional, ‘long goodbye’ charade – enabling him to buy time so that he can be paid the dirty money he may think he is owed, and perhaps remain in office (like Wolfowitz) following a US-provoked satanic catastrophe in the Middle East.

• US Vice President Richard Cheney, key architect of the ‘Act of War’ against the United Kingdom and Her Majesty the Queen, reported in our posting of 4th May, appears to be preparing the ground for the perpetration of a ghastly crime against humanity, urged by the demons controlling his ‘perfectly possessed’ cranium to detonate nuclear weapons so that his serial financial crimes, and those of his Nazi and Zionazi colleagues, can be covered by the resulting global debris (or so he may believe). He is also reported to have prepared to escape if necessary to Dubai – hardly a felicitous choice, since if the mad American Zionazis detonate nuclear weapons in that region, Dubai is quite likely to become uninhabitable. (This is one reason for believing that Cheney’s Gulf sabre-rattling may be desperate bluff on his part. But of course one cannot be sure).

• Due to the US criminalists’ unfettered banditry, the so-called ‘Special Relationship’ between the United States and Britain (basically an intelligence pact) has collapsed, probably irretrievably. This is a considerable achievement on the part of the German long-range strategic cadre inside the Central Intelligence Agency’s corrupt structures.

• As in Nazi Germany, the discredited US Generals are sitting like petrified rabbits blinded by the headlights of oncoming cars, while the serial financial criminals prepare to cover up their crimes (so they imagine) by triggering what they anticipate will be a controllable, regionalised nuclear holocaust – perhaps having had their Luciferian plans disturbed by our reporting of their original intention to preside over a provocation involving the detonation of four megaton bombs to coincide with the Republican National Convention to be held in the Twin Cities of Minneapolis-St Paul starting on 1st September 2008.

NOTE: No-one has disputed our earlier exposure of this intended provocation.
This is because disputing what is true is not an option.

• This provocation was to have given them the pretext for scrapping the US Constitution and installing the dictatorship of which George W. Bush Jr. spoke during the 2000 General Election campaign when he said that he’d prefer it if the United States was a dictatorship, ‘as long as I’m the dictator’. That was in his mind then, and it has remained in his deluded mind ever since.

• The United Nations, newly equipped with powers from the International Court of Justice to arrest these political, official and banking criminals, and not just in the United States, has not yet activated the necessary decisive measures to enforce the Rule of Law – thus so far emulating the lily-livered pipsqueaks in the United States calling themselves Gold Badges who are too terrified of these Nazi thugs and serial thieves and scamsters to do what is necessary in order to save their Republic. These people ponce around in uniforms, but lack true will and guts. Interpol, Europol and National Police Forces, please note.

• The City of London Police Fraud Squad, notified by the Editor of this service in general terms of the perpetration of the diversion of $4.8 trillion of gold assets from and involving the Bank of England and the serial US criminalists, indicated that they would be addressing the matter.

Specifically, the Editor spoke initially about this extreme crisis to DC Magnus Goodmanson at Scotland Yard [0207-230 1570], who directed him to the City of London Fraud Squad [0207-601 2999], where he informed Detective Sergeant Robertson of the illegal alienation of the Queen’s liened gold assets. Robertson said he would be in contact with the Editor the following morning, but failed to fulfil this straightforward undertaking.

Of course, the Editor did not expect the City of London Fraud Squad, any more than the cowardly US Gold Badges, to do their duty here, given the extreme gravity of the situation: but these details are recorded in case any remaining ‘Useful Idiots’ out there prefer their own ill-informed unbelief to the harsh reality of the FACTS we are having to report.

• Her Majesty the Queen, having demanded the IMMEDIATE return of her stolen liened gold (all 10,000 tonnes of it*) when visiting with the President and Vice President of the United States, and at the Kentucky races, was reported on Saturday night to be STILL WAITING FOR THE CRIMINAL AMERICAN AUTHORITIES TO CARRY OUT HER LEGITIMATE DEMANDS.

•During one meeting with the US President, the truly REMARKABLE 80-year-old British Monarch is believed to have insisted with steely resolve that her stolen liened gold assets must be returned at once (all 10,000 tonnes of it*) via a reverse unwinding of the illegal transaction, and that the Ambassador’s $4.5 trillion Settlement must be implemented simultaneously. The American crooks asked for ‘two weeks’ and The Queen said this was out of the question.

• The problems the US criminalists and their UK crime partners face are that:

1. The gold belonging to The Queen is liened, i.e. encumbered, and was therefore not available to be sold off at all. [Handling stolen goods. Fraud. Conspiracy].

2. They have sold the gold on. [Handling stolen goods. Fraud. Conspiracy].

3. They have been having difficulty ‘persuading’ the criminals who bought The Queen’s liened gold, to part with the assets that they have illegally acquired. [The ‘purchasers’ of the liened gold failed of course to conduct due diligence and are also liable for having corruptly handled stolen goods. Handling stolen goods. Fraud. Conspiracy].

4. All the parties involved in this ‘Act of War’ perpetrated by the US criminal gangs running the US Government are KNOWN BY NAME, and the transactions have been traced, so that their behaviour represents not only a crime of unprecedentedly brazen arrogance, but also one of such extreme stupidity as to give new meaning to the adjective ‘stupid’. Obviously these megacreeps thought they could get away with this abomination; but they were monitored and their identities are earmarked, which makes them extremely nervous (with good reason).

Further:

5. Her Majesty The Queen reportedly told the disconcerted US President pointedly that ‘I look forward to working with the Ambassador’.

6. A very sharp letter was sent allegedly on Her Majesty’s instructions to certain institutions in the City of London demanding their immediate compliance with Her Majesty’s demand for the illegal transaction perpetrated against her by the US criminals, with corrupt assistance from inside the Bank of England and elsewhere in the financial community, to be reversed forthwith.

7. Two corrupt US giga-banks, alleged to be Bank of America (the CIA’s main institution) and Wachovia (said to be the Bush Family money laundry) initially refused to comply, but were reported to us to have complied by Friday evening last week, with relevant requirements.

8. The Queen is believed to have become aware that she had been deceived, scammed and lied to, by her own Prime Minister and by the President and Vice President of the United States, after being briefed on, and possibly having had sight of, the letter addressed to Mr Cheney from Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., and signed by Ambassador Leo Wanta, that we posted here on 4th May. The Editor faxed a copy of this letter, together with his relevant email on this subject that he had addressed to Buckingham Palace, to the Chancery at the British Embassy in Washington DC, on Saturday 5th May. The sight of the Ambassador’s signature on the letter will have been more than enough to signal the truth of the matter to Her Majesty, had she not been fully aware of it earlier.

Her Majesty knows and very rightly trusts the Ambassador, upon whom she conferred an honorary knighthood in recognition of exceptional (unreported) services that he rendered to the British.

9. Mr Henry M. ‘Conflict-of-Interest’ Paulson, soi-disant US Treasury Secretary, was reported to be NOT INTENDING to attend the Group of Eight Meeting scheduled for 18th-19th May in Germany. This is because he doesn’t fancy being slammed up against a brick wall and having handcuffs placed on his criminal wrists, as happened last December. Instead, he is supposed to be hanging around Washington to meet Chinese representatives, to see what he can wangle with them despite their loathing of this operative because he has lied to them so often.

10. A document, which may have been a Diplomatic Note, was despatched to Washington following or in association with The Queen’s State Visit, in which Her Majesty’s legitimate demands for the rectification of the US ‘Act of War’ perpetrated against her were spelled out in black and white in language easy even for serial Texan criminalist operatives to understand.

Obviously, the Editor is not a party to the content of this document. However one element of it has been leaked: it reportedly states in the starkest terms that certain prominent highest-level US office-holders are precluded from entering the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (and presumably its Overseas Territories as well, which will be irksome for those among them who employ the services of the Cayman Islands, for instance) at any time in the future.

So Mr Paulson won’t be able to travel to London, either.

THE RULE OF LAW RESTS WITH HER MAJESTY ALONE
Now let us discuss the straightforward issue of the Rule of law. During Her Majesty’s State Visit to the United States, The Queen made a number of pointed references to the Rule of Law. Manifestly such references were not inserted as rhetorical wallpaper. They were pointed indications of the concern of the British Head of State at the well-known fact (better known since we started these reports last year) that the Rule of Law has disintegrated in the United States.

So much so, that Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta, a diplomat serving on the instructions of the White House and so confirmed at a ceremony in Paris presided over by the French Finance Minister du jour, was illegally arrested, stripped in the snow, incarcerated, held under house arrest, placed on probation and otherwise tormented (five murder attempts and six operations to have him declared insane, all of which, by the Grace of God alone, failed), for having ‘not’ paid an illegally demanded State civil tax assessment for $14,129 that he has in fact paid three times, and which is STILL being demanded by the corrupt Wisconsin Department of Revenue. A R.I.C.O prosecution beckons for ALL present and past officials and office-holders concerned.

So much so, too, that officials, office-holders, intelligence operatives, legislators and others serving at highest levels in the United States have spent the past several Administrations enriching themselves by exploiting, alienating, diverting, collateralising, hypothecating and otherwise illegally exploiting Ambassador Wanta’s funds, in collaboration with their corrupt intelligence, intermediary and banking sector co-conspirators and accessories to the fact of these crimes, with impunity – given the fecklessness of the useless American Gold Badges, Secret Service and other ‘law enforcement’ agents. Such officials operate against lower fry, but have shown themselves to be feeble and ineffective when it comes to compelling high-level office-holding intelligence criminals to comply with the law.

So, the Rule of Law has indeed collapsed in the United States. You can’t have a PARTIAL Rule of Law. Either it is applicable to all, with no exceptions, or it is redundant. It’s redundant.

THE RULE OF LAW HAS TO BE BACKED BY FORCE
So much so, that these US criminal operatives thought that they would help themselves to The Queen’s gold assets (*which have remained, of course, in situ, either at the Bank of England itself or in Kloten, Switzerland, or elsewhere, but under illegal ownership, since the ‘Act of War’ theft was perpetrated on 29th-30th March 2007).

Under Queen Elizabeth I, penalties for financial crimes included being beheaded in the Tower of London, or else being hanged on the gibbets at Tyburn. Other penalties too disgusting to describe on this polite website were also meted out to anyone who stole financial assets and was minded not to disgorge them with interest. Why do we mention these fundamental historical facts?

Because they illustrate the fact, now forgotten in the decadent United States and Britain, that the Rule of Law was once backed up by FORCE. Indeed, the Rule of Law came into being over time precisely as a SUBSTITUTE for the use of force, which by definition fundamentally represents the Law of the Jungle.

WANTAGATE AND THE ‘ACT OF WAR’ AGAINST BRITAIN
If The Queen’s liened gold, stolen by US officials and conspirators at the highest levels of the bandit American Bush II Government, are not immediately restored, and Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta paid simultaneously, in accordance with The Queen’s legitimate demand on behalf of her subjects, the Wantagate crisis will have escalated by an order of magnitude so that:

• The Rule of Law, which has collapsed in the United States, has been replaced by the Law of the Jungle – a fact long since evident at the intergovernmental level (where the Rule of Law hardly exists due to the corruption inter alia at the International Court of Justice and inside the European Commission, and thanks to the DVD/CIA’s use of wholesale bribery).

• The US Generals, who ought to be demanding the application of the Rule of Law in their own country instead of collaborating with these serial criminals to perpetrate a nuclear holocaust in the Middle East, followed (as was intended) by a cynical firework display on 1st September 2008, are revealed to be instruments of the New Underworld Order, rather than servants of the American people. Their bombast and boastfulness is thus exposed as being indistinguishable from the behaviour of the compliant Nazi Generals under Hitler.

They relish the fact that the United States is intended to be the thuggish so-called ‘enforcement arm’ of the New Underworld Order, and neglect their solemn duty towards the American people. They are accordingly despicable co-conspirators in this looming catastrophe.

ALLEVIATING THE WORST CORRUPTION CRISIS IN WORLD HISTORY
To sum up, then, the world faces the worst corruption crisis in history: and that is no exaggeration. In the immediate short term, it can be alleviated by:

1. The reversal of the wanton ‘Act of War’ perpetrated on 29th-30th March under cover of the UK banking shutdown, by the highest-level US criminal operatives against the Bank of England, which actually involved the alienation of some 10,000 tonnes of liened gold belonging to The Queen.

Note: At the highest level under a Monarchy, certain assets of the State and of the Monarch may be interchangeable. The same situation applies, for instance, in Saudi Arabia.

[*Note: This gold was not actually moved anywhere of course. It was just sold illegally and placed illegally under new ownership, a criminal transaction which has to be unwound if the American Ambassador is not to be kicked out of London and the bank accounts of the criminal operatives held within British jurisdictions kept frozen, and their assets confiscated without recourse].

2. Ambassador Leo Wanta’s $4.5 trillion Settlement must be paid in parallel with the demanded reversal of the criminal ‘Act of War’ perpetrated by the American crooks, with UK criminalist connivance, against Her Majesty. The long-running Wantagate saga must be brought to an end.

GEOPOLITICAL PURPOSE OF THE ‘ACT OF WAR’
In case the main geopolitical New Underworld Order purpose of the ‘Act of War’ has STILL escaped anyone, we reiterate its cynical rationale here.

The incoming British Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, has remained silent for years, for very good reasons. In the first place, two attempts were made to assassinate him, during Blair’s premiership. Secondly, as an intelligence operative himself, he knows from his lofty perspective, about all the financial criminality that has been going on at intergovernmental level and in parallel within the World Bank, exploiting Ambassador Leo Wanta’s assets held at co-conspiring banks without his permission. He also knows that the CIA informed its myopic and compartmentalised cadres and the corrupt banks that Leo Emil Wanta died many years ago, a lie which (believe it or not) is STILL being perpetrated to this day (see below).

And he knows that MI6 is controlled by a treacherous operative whose secret allegiance is to Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD), Dachau, the German ‘Black’ Nazi strategic Continuum intelligence agency that operates behind covers provided by the Soviets and the Illuminati.

He also knows that the dark European Commission is a den of institutionalised corruption [see our report, Archive, 12th October 2005], and that Britain would be ‘Better Off Out’ of this hellish DVD-sponsored quagmire, which is governed by ‘regulation’ (the essence of its control methodology).

The purpose of the ‘Act of War’ perpetrated against HM The Queen, the Bank of England and the United Kingdom, apart from greed and lust for self-enrichment, was therefore to destabilise Gordon Brown’s premiership from the outset by bankrupting the Bank of England and the Monarchy so that, the Nazi strategists intended, Great Britain would be forced to abandon sterling in favour of the European Collective Currency, the Euro – as a prelude to total British integration within this Pan-German (Nazi) sponsored EU den of institutionalised corruption.

And the coup de grace was to be delivered by the American prong of the DVD fork, presided over by the Grand Godfather of DVD, George H. W. Bush Sr., a.k.a. Herr Scherf (or Scherff).

CYNICAL OPERATION AGAINST BRITAIN EXPOSED
Fortunately, this cynical geopolitical engineering operation has hit the ropes and The Queen realised she had been lied to, deceived and double-crossed not only by the duplicitous American criminal Government, but also by her very own participating traitor of a Prime Minister, the crass, arrogant, self-indulgent, opinionated, wrong-headed, deluded, corrupt and discredited ‘Tony’ Blair.

It is now, therefore, incumbent upon the incoming Prime Minister to stick to his guns, to refuse to be bulldozed by these corrupt end-game bullies, and to pull Great Britain out of the corrupt DVD-dominated European Union Collective in a display of British defiance of the secret criminal Nazi clique that is seeking to rule the world in order to control legal processes so that their immunity is ‘guaranteed’ for ever. For come their New Underworld Order nirvana, these criminals will control the already extensively corrupted justice systems (hence Blair’s establishment of a prospectively corrupt, US-style Department of Justice in the United Kingdom), thereby ensuring that they do not suffer the same fate as the Ambassador.

HERE ARE SOME CONSIDERATIONS TO BE GOING ON WITH:

• The ONLY powerful defender of the Rule of Law is now the truly remarkable 80-year old British Monarch, whose extreme displeasure and determination to ensure that her will prevails cannot be underestimated.

• The Queen MUST enforce the Rule of Law, and Her Majesty MUST receive unwavering support from all right-thinking observers and ‘actives’ all over the world, and especially at the highest levels of the relevant Governments.

• The two-pronged DVD operation to tie the hands of the incoming British Prime Minister has been exposed and is on track towards utter failure and compromise. Note that Gordon Brown was, all of a sudden. ‘acknowledged’ throughout the Labour Government’s cadres last week as being the ‘rightful’ Prime Minister-in-waiting. The reasons that this happened were (a) that Tony Blair has effectively been sacked by the Monarch and (b) that the strategists prematurely thought that they had got away with their cynical, orchestrated $4.8 trillion gold asset ‘Act of War’ heist perpetrated on 29th-30th March 2007 and had therefore bankrupted the Bank of England, the Monarchy and the United Kingdom, tying Brown’s hands accordingly [see posting of 1st May 2007].

• How wrong they were, and what massive consequences will now ensue from their extreme arrogance and Teutonic/Zionazi stupidity.

• The so-called UK-US ‘Special Relationship’ has been destroyed.

• The criminal cadres are in a state of extreme panic, thanks mainly to the courage of Ambassador Wanta and Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., and our disclosures resulting from their courageous stance, on this website.

• Indicative of this, not least, is the incredible reality that the lie that Leo Wanta is dead is STILL being perpetrated [see below]. The reason for this is that the moment the crooks admit that he is alive, they are finished. Ironically, former Wisconsin Governor Tommy Thompson and President George W. Bush Jr. have recently formally acknowledged the Ambassador’s existence in the letters that we publicised in our posting dated 1st May.

This in turn reveals the panicky confusion and ‘professional’ incompetence and crudeness of the Agency’s flatulent disinformation and discrediting hacks.

• ALL US intelligence cadres who have been involved in this financial corruption over the years now fear for their futures, and rightly so. There is no question that, over time, they will receive their come-uppance. For instance:

• A former aide to Wisconsin Governor Tommy Thompson (see our posting dated 1st May 2007), Nicholas Hurtgen, is reported to have been indicted on seven charges of mail and wire fraud. This indicates that the deep investigation, going back many years, that is the primary ongoing fallout from Wantagate, is actually yielding results – a hopeful sign amid the gloom of this crisis.

• But the main fall-out from this unprecedented crisis has yet to occur, and may assume dramatic proportions. There is a temptation for the Cheney-MK-Ultra cadres to cover their dirty tracks by triggering nuclear explosions in the Middle East and at home, with the proposed crime against humanity in Iran being blamed on the ‘intransigence’ of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who is of course just a planted intelligence ‘Dark Actor Playing Games’; and the now exposed atrocity that had been planned for 1st September 2008 being cynically blamed upon Islamic terrorists originally trained by the criminal CIA and Pakistani-trained intelligence cadres inter alia at local madrassahs furnished with CIA-prepared subversive teaching materials – or else trained by the parallel ‘Black’ continuing DVD-cooperating Soviets (GRU) at the terrorism training territories of Chechnya and Mozdok, a vast Soviet military area adjacent to Chechnya from which Soviet General Grachev once boasted that Moscow could wage world war indefinitely.

• The evil intentions of the US Criminal Government are implicit from the promulgation on 11th May 2007 of National Security Policy Directive 51 (NSPD1) and Homeland Security Policy Directive 20 (HSPD20) which are concerned with national contingency policy and ‘continuity of government’ during the crisis which the criminals thought they were preparing in order to procure the pretext for a Nazi-style takeover, dictatorship and the subsequent activation of death trains and the 800+ US GULAG Concentration Camps to which these madmen intended to consign all who opposed their diabolical takeover plans, aimed at fulfilling the strategy outlined by the Nazis’ Madrid-based German Geopolitical Centre to found the ‘Thousand-Year Reich on the Ruins of the United States’.

• Given this state of affairs, ONCE AGAIN, the only nation standing up for freedom against the German Nazis is the United Kingdom, whose 80-year-old Monarch insists upon the implementation of the Rule of Law and has had the guts, unlike anyone else except the Ambassador and Michael Cottrell, to stand up to these criminalists and to call their bluff.

WHEN CONFRONTED, THEY ‘FALL BACK TO THE GROUND’
This is something to which they are NOT accustomed. However your own correspondent’s experience is that when Workers of Darkness are offered serious resistance, they are so astonished that anyone has had the effrontery to confront their arrogance, that they back off.

Consider the following incredible confirmation of this fact from the Gospel of John, Chapter 18, verses 1-6:

‘When Jesus has spoken these words, he went forth with his disciples over the brook Cedron, where was a garden, into the which he entered, and his disciples.

And Judas also, which betrayed him, knew the place: for Jesus oft-times resorted thither with his disciples.

Judas then, having received a band of men and officers from the chief priests and Pharisees, cometh thither with lanterns and torches and weapons.

Jesus therefore, knowing all things that should come upon him, went forth, and said unto them, Whom seek ye?

They answered him, Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus saith unto them, I am he. And Judas also, which betrayed him, stood with them.

As soon then as he had said unto them, I am he, THEY WENT BACKWARD, AND FELL TO THE GROUND’.

This passage assures those who believe on his Name that if we have the simple faith and determination to stand up to the Workers of Darkness, they will fall back to the ground.

And that, dear friends, is what is happening ‘as we speak’.

HYPOCRISY CORNER:
Having foolishly fallen victim to a sophisticated intelligence sex operation to compromise him, the half-Jewish operative Lord Browne of Madingley, now the disgraced former Chief Executive of British Petroleum, lied to the High Court concerning his male ‘lover’ of four years, a Canadian plant named Chevalier, in order to try to prevent publication of this relationship by one of Britain’s odious (Leninist exposure) newspaper rags. Lord Browne had also served as a Director of Goldman Sachs since its floatation in 1999.

Browne is thought to have spoken by telephone to Goldman’s Chairman, Lloyd Blankfein, on 9th May, in the course of which conversation he offered his resignation, which was duly accepted. According to The Daily Telegraph of 11th May, a ‘former’ executive at Goldman was reported to have asserted that there was ‘enormous sympathy for Lord Browne’s personal misery, but from a corporate governance perspective he had to go. Goldman demands decency, honesty and truthfulness. You can’t have one rule for the executives and one rule for the rest of the staff’.

Note that this comment was attributed to a ‘former’ Goldman executive.

The reason for the inclusion of the adjective ‘former’ will presumably have been that if these remarks had been attributed to a CURRENT Goldman executive, they would have prospectively compromised Goldman Sachs & Company, given that Mr Blankfein and his co-directors, including the disgraced Lord Browne, are complicit in the illegal diversion and circumvention of the Wanta Settlement in the context of the institution’s failure to disgorge the Ambassador’s $4.5 trillion funds as required by the Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., into its Securities Account with Morgan Stanley, New York, over a prolonged period of time.

By ensuring the inclusion of the word ‘former’, the newspaper and Goldman Sachs will have assumed that they cannot be accused of rank hypocrisy, double standards and double-mindedness – promulgating precisely one rule of conduct for PR and public consumption purposes, and the Law of the Jungle with respect to the illegal retention of the Ambassador’s $4.5 trillion Settlement funds.

NEW AGENCY TRASHING CAMPAIGN AGAINST US
Almost immediately after the delivery of the letter to Vice President Cheney that we posted here on 4th May, the desperate Agency disinformation and diversion cadres started a beefed-up campaign designed to discredit Mr Cottrell, the Ambassador and your humble servant, this correspondent. They are recycling old lies, such as that Ambassador Leo Wanta doesn’t exist, is dead, etc., the corollary being that this Editor is suffering from mental delusions (on which these nutcases are extremely keen), and that the eminent personage he has come to know so well from visits and telephone conversations since May 2004 is in fact Father Christmas or some other entity of their fertile but putrid imaginations.

The Editor became aware of this latest avalanche of lies about eight days ago, and enquired as to its purpose. Among the informed answers he has received to this question is the following:

‘The crooks can’t admit that the Ambassador exists because the moment they do this, they are either dead, or in jail’.

How fascinating, then, that President George W. Bush Jr. addressed Leo as ‘Dear Ambassador Leo’, in the letter that we publicised here on 1st May, thus acknowledging the Ambassador’s existence! [14th May, 9.30pm London time: As noted at the top of this report, the NSA perpetrated a SECOND illegal ‘snip’ of this post, removing part of the final Goldman Sachs paragraph (above), the whole of this section on the CIA’s latest pathetic trashing campaign, and the rest of this report including of course the list of laws of which the desperate criminalist cadres are in glaring breach].

And attempting to trash a securities and financial expert as proficient as Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., is like trying to prove that Leonardo da Vinci couldn’t draw and was no good at sculpture.

We also venture to add that trashing the Editor of this service, after he has been doing the same work non-stop since 1970 (37 years) and has earned a living from selling subscriptions to the most discriminating central banks and global financial institutions, governments, intelligence agencies, international institutions, private investors and corporations around the world, may likewise, by definition, be an uphill task. These people are low-level scum of the earth: ‘Useful Idiots’ who appear to enjoy displaying this reality to the world, in order to justify their filthy Agency stipends.

WARNING TO THE AGENCY’S AOL OPERATION
At 15:00 hours on 12th May 2007, the Editor received a typically confused and badly-written email from a Marion Horn, Jr., which began as follows: ‘I am attempting to determine if you are one of the good guys or one of the people who just make statements that are unfounded or not true’! After this promising start, this operative continued: ‘First of all I don’t know Leo Wanta and have been unable to validate his actual existence’. The Editor was of course able to do this in person in May 2004, when the Ambassador graciously received and spoke with him for three hours, and again a year later, during a second private visit. The Queen knows teh Ambassador well, too.

Next, this fellow elaborated: ‘I have been informed by some parties of the intelligences that this is a big set up’, revealing of course that he is being lied to by his own rattled peers, whereupon he proceeded to bang the drum for a diversionary operation which is nothing to do with Ambassador Leo Wanta, never has been, and never will be. He then stated: ‘You said you know all about me, I doubt that, since we have never met’. The reason the Editor is aware of this operative is that for months last year, he selfishly blocked our email server with his emails and vast attachments (which we trashed) attempting to draw our attention to various financial claims which are nothing to do with us or the Ambassador. He has no standing in this matter whatsoever.

Finally, in the familiar language of the US intelligence bully, he resorted to the following threat:

‘Call me if you are a man of your word and you mean to find the truth [sic!!!!]. If not SHUT up and stop what you are doing now’.

UTTERING THREATS IS A CRIME IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
The reason that we publicise this crude threat and attempt at coercion is that we require the CIA’s AOL operation to cease and desist from disseminating threats against the Editor of this service. The utterance of threats is a criminal offence in the United Kingdom. In the event of any repetition, we reserve all our rights and may sue AOL as well as this operative in the English Courts. We may also take action against the US organisation that is snipping this report.

We therefore require AOL to intervene forthwith by contacting this operative at his email address [jfivestartrust@aol.com] and instructing him to cease uttering threats against the Editor of this service (and the Ambassador, by the way). And the subsidiary reason that we are publicising this on our website is that, having entered our complaint on the requisite AOL form on their huge website, we were unable to send the email in question, given that the system appeared to have been set up in such a way that no complaints can actually be delivered to AOL at all.

Well, as has been emphasised before, there are other ways to skin a cat.

LAWS BREACHED BY THE HIGH-LEVEL U.S. CRIMINAL OPERATIVES

For the sake of good order, we reproduce again the list of Statutes etc. of which the officials and institutions in question remain in breach. This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and total contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Ambassador Wanta’s funds:

LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR WANTA’S TAGGED $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT HIGHEST LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006:

US laws breached by President Bush Jr., Richard Cheney, Henry M. Paulson, Robert M. Kimmitt, Michael Chertoff, other officials previously named in these reports, all members of G. W. Bush’s Cabinet, and the Boards of Directors of Goldman Sachs and Co, Bank of America, Citibank Group, Wachovia Bank, JPMorganChase, Bank of Nova Scotia, Chemical Bank, First Union Bank and other US and foreign institutions, including the Bank of England, which have been illegally exploiting Ambassador Wanta’s tagged and earmarked $4.5 trillion Settlement money, always intended for the benefit of the American people and for the paying down of the US Treasury’s background debt:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC]
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or the earlier Wanta Crisis reports. We are a private intelligence publishing house. Subscriptions to our services may be entered by pressing SUBSCRIBE against the selected publication title, and following the ultra-safe web payment procedure. We have no subventions apart from our subscriptions and books income, and cannot spend unproductive time on Internet discussions. If you would like to enter into formal consultation arrangements with the Editor on a fee-paying basis, you need to go, in the first instance, to the Global Analysis Limited section of this website and send us details about your requirements. We charge for our time and cannot provide free advice on any of these issues.

This has been a straightforward business operation since 1963, and has nothing to do with any outside sponsorship.

‘ACT OF WAR’ BY THE UNITED STATES AGAINST THE UK

U.S. RAID ON BANK OF ENGLAND CONNECTED TO ‘WANTAGATE’

Saturday 5 May 2007 20:59

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for ‘Wantagate’ reports since April 2006. [Note: The CLICK HERE panel is now: NEWS. A panel giving details of our latest publications has been added].

LETTER TO VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY DEMANDING WANTA SETTLEMENT PAYMENT

The following letter has been sent by Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., the Executive Vice President of Ambassador Leo Wanta’s AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., to Vice President Richard B. Cheney. It shows how the United States’ ‘Act of Economic War’ against the United Kingdom/the Bank of England is associated not only with the geopolitical engineering identified in our last two postings, but also with a clumsy attempt by Vice President Cheney to mask the fact that the diverted and exploited $4.5 trillion Wanta Settlement funds have been unlawfully kept “off the books” while US Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson, at Cheney’s direction, diverted $4.8 trillion from the Bank of England on 29th-30th March 2007 in an attempt to place these funds “on the books” before authorizing the release of the $4.5 trillion to the lawful AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. securities account at the Morgan Stanley Co., Inc. coordinates.

Additionally, a ‘refunding’, in the form of new issue unsubordinated debt obligations (ITraxx exchange traded funds via Deutsche Bank, Germany) will be used to recover the misappropriated (expropriated) Bank of England monies in a further despicable operation designed to delay the authorised release or to prevent the payment of the Wanta Settlement funds, thereby also illegally preventing Ambassador Leo Wanta’s corporation from remitting $1.575 trillion to the US Treasury in fulfilment of his legal obligations and in furtherance of the interests of the United States and of its people. We have no doubt at all that those concerned, and all who are monitoring this crisis around the world, understand the precise significance of the foregoing and of what follows.

This letter should be read in the context, in particular, of our two previous postings (dated 1st and 4th May 2007, respectively). In the meantime, multiple attempts are being made by the US centrally directed conspirators to obstruct the course of justice by means of foul ‘dirty tricks’ which will be exposed due course.

Their hopeless objective is to bury the worst financial corruption crisis in world history, and their theft of hundreds of trillions of dollars (which they could have covered up had they paid the $4.5 trillion compromise Wanta Settlement this time last year).

In this desperate, cynical endeavour, they are conspicuously failing.

AMERITRUST GROUPE, INC.
Office of the Treasurer
1167 West 7th Street
Erie, Pennsylvania 16502

Telephone/ANS: (814) 455 9218
Facsimile: (814) 453 4453

Date: 3 May 2007

To: The Honorable Richard B. Cheney
Vice President of the United States
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washington DC 20500 USA

Cc: The Honorable Henry M. Paulson, Jr.
Secretary of the Treasury

Via: Fax: (202) 456-7044

In the matter of: The Agreed Upon Financial Settlement of Four Point Five Trillion United States Dollars ($4,500,000,000,000.00 US Dollars) regarding Ambassador Leo E. Wanta/Lee E. Wanta and AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.

Ref: Encl [omitted for obvious reasons from this posting] (1) Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. corporate securities account coordinates for AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. dated 14 August 2006

Re: Immediate Inward Remittance of Financial Settlement Funds:

Dear Sir:

It has been brought to this firm’s attention that the referenced agreed upon Financial Settlement payment of Four Point Five Trillion United States Dollars ($4,500,000,000,000.00) US Dollars is still on account within the United States Treasury Account of JPMORGAN CHASE Custodial Account at CITIBANK with the beneficial ownership of Leo E. Wanta/Lee E. Wanta. Further, this firm is advised that the assignment to AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. is still in force, per instructions to Secretary Henry M. Paulson, Jr. on 14 August 2006, et seq.

Additionally, the above referenced Settlement Funds have been kept unlawfully “off the books” while Secretary Paulson, et al., at your direction, has utilized the Four Point Eight Trillion United States Dollars plus ($4,800,000,000,000.00 US Dollars), diverted from the Bank of England on March 29-March 30th 2007, in an attempt to place said funds “on the books” before authorizing release to the lawful AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. Securities Account at Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. coordinates (Encl 1).

Today, this firm was advised that a refunding, in the form of new issue unsubordinated debt obligations, will be used to recover the “misappropriated” Bank of England funds in a further unlawful attempt to delay the authorized release of the aforementioned Settlement Funds and thereby cause further delay and/or the prevention of payment – by Leo (Lee) E. Wanta/AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. – of payable taxes of One Point Five Seven Five Trillion United States Dollars ($1,575,000,000,000.00 US Dollars) to the Treasury of the United States of America (or as directed by the Office of the President of the United States of America).

Accordingly, with respect, this letter hereby advises and instructs you, as Vice President of the United States of America, to immediately issue the authorization and inward remittance of the unlawfully held Four Point Five Trillion United States Dollars ($4,500,000,000,000.00 US Dollars) to the enclosed AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. corporate securities account.

Whereas, the President of the United States of America, having signed H.R. 3723 on October 11, 1996, has protected this transaction by allowing Corporations the right to declare their Contracts, Clients, Internal Procedures and Information, and the transactions they engage in as a Corporate or Trade Secret fully protected under the Economic and Industrial Espionage Laws of the United States of America and the International Economic Community.

Inasmuch, the names, Identities, bank coordinates and other identifying information of persons or entities that are party to this transaction, contained herein, or learned hereafter, shall be a Corporate Trade Secret that shall not be disseminated or other than as provided for herein, or as allowed under applicable law. Any unauthorized Disclosure of this Private Transaction, parties to, or other material fact of, shall subject the violators to Criminal prosecution.

Best regards,

AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.

Authorized by: Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., Executive Vice President and Treasurer (814) 874 3257 [signed by Mr Cottrell, 5-3-07]

Authorized by: Lee. E. Wanta, Chief Executive Officer, President
[signed by Ambassador Wanta, 5-3-07].

Encl. 1) Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. corporate securities account coordinates for AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. dated 14 August 2006.

Cc. The Honorable George W. Bush, President of the United States of America.
AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc..
Mr William Bonney Sr., C.B.I.C. Corporation, BOLDCAP LIMITED, INC..
Thomas E.Henry, Attorney at Law.

LAWS BREACHED BY THE HIGH-LEVEL U.S. CRIMINAL OPERATIVES

IMPORTANT NOTICE: THIS LIST IS HEREBY EXTENDED FOR THIS POSTING
For the sake of good order, we reproduce again the list of Statutes etc. of which the officials and institutions in question remain in breach. This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and total contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Ambassador Wanta’s funds:

LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR WANTA’S TAGGED $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT HIGHEST LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006:

US laws breached by President Bush Jr., Richard Cheney, Henry M. Paulson, Robert M. Kimmitt, Michael Chertoff, other officials previously named in these reports, all members of G. W. Bush’s Cabinet, and the Boards of Directors of Goldman Sachs and Co, Bank of America, Citibank Group, Wachovia Bank, JPMorganChase, Bank of Nova Scotia, Chemical Bank, First Union Bank and other US and foreign institutions, including the Bank of England, which have been illegally exploiting Ambassador Wanta’s tagged and earmarked $4.5 trillion Settlement money, always intended for the benefit of the American people and for the paying down of the US Treasury’s background debt:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• ADDED FOR THIS POSTING: Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC]
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• ADDED FOR THIS POSTING: Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or the earlier Wanta Crisis reports. We are a private intelligence publishing house. Subscriptions to our services may be entered by pressing SUBSCRIBE against the selected publication title, and following the ultra-safe web payment procedure. We have no subventions apart from our subscriptions and books income, and cannot spend unproductive time on Internet discussions. If you would like to enter into formal consultation arrangements with the Editor on a fee-paying basis, you need to go, in the first instance, to the Global Analysis Limited section of this website and send us details about your requirements. We charge for our time and cannot provide free advice on any of these issues. This has been a straightforward business operation since 1963, and has nothing to do with any outside sponsorship.