S.E.C. PHANTOM SHARES FRAUD: NEW INTELLIGENCE

cropped-chrisstory

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS FOLLOWING THE BLOWING OF THE CAULDRON LID

Tuesday 2 March 2010 01:00

• REPORTS UPDATE: We have a very extensive report containing inter alia the promised detailed information demonstrating/proving that ALL securitisation is ILLEGAL under US and Common Law (applicable in the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand etc). This report is nearly ready to be posted.

However on 9th March we became aware of a MONUMENTAL FRAUD, so blatant and careless, that we are likely to need to present details of this fraud, which has been set up for the explicit purpose of stealing and diverting the monies directed to be payable to Mr Michael C. Cottrell’s Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. When we became aware of this US fraud, its extreme crudity and crass stupidity caused consternation beyond anything experienced to date. We are currently awaiting receipt of further details, but we already have enough official documentary information to hand to enable us to conclude that the racketeers that we have cornered have now gone completely mad.

There was no way that this fraud could not have been detected. Because it HAS been detected, all hell has broken loose today [9th March 2010], especially as ALL CONCERNED, via their cadres who are paid to listen-in to our phone calls, are aware that WE have the data on this fraud and WILL, as always, ensure that YOU are fully appraised of the lengths these serpents will go to STEAL MONEY.

• THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PHANTOM SHARES FRAUD: UPDATE

• THE SITUATION REGARDING THE TAX TAKEN ON 31ST DECEMBER 2009:

• IT APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN MISAPPROPRIATED: THIS IS A COLOSSAL ‘INSIDE’ CRIME:
INVESTIGATION BY NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE HAS BEEN DEMANDED

• LETTER TO THIS EDITOR FROM THE LAWYERS FOR THE CMKM VICTIMS

• LETTER WAS LEAKED, AND HAS BEEN CIRCULATING BELOW THE RADAR

• PARALLEL LETTER TO THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FROM THE LAWYERS FOR THE CMKM VICTIMS

• RELEVANT TEXT FROM OUR REPORT DATED 12TH FEBRUARY 2010

• THE JAILING OF THE FORMER GOVERNOR OF THE BANK OF ENGLAND

• Quote of the year:

Christopher Story is a problem for them, but they believe they can handle it provided what he publishes is not taken up by the mainstream media’.

Statement to the Editor on 26th February 2010 by Mr A. Clifton Hodges, Lawyer for the CMKM/CMKX SEC scam victims, 26th February 2010

• Quote of the century:

‘It doesn’t matter that it’s not true. All that matters is that it’s out there’.

Statement to the Editor by journalist Gordon Thomas, December 2004, in Bath, Somerset, after Mr Thomas had informed the Editor that MI-6 had borne false witness against the Editor of this service by conveying the false report to the gullible mainstream press that Mr Story had been associated with Sir Mark Thatcher et al in connection with the notorious aborted Equatorial Guinea fiasco, notwithstanding that this Editor has done nothing at all since 1963 but run his own publishing businesses 24/7, 365 days a year, so much so that he never even went on holidays with our four daughters when they were growing up.

When the Editor asked Mr Thomas why such blatant lies would be disseminated to the press, especially given that the Editor used to have huge op-ed articles published regularly on the main page of The Daily Telegraph in the 1970s and early 1980s, Gordon Thomas replied:

‘They think you may be dangerous, because you control your own publications and you have the documents. They have told the press this stuff so that when you publish what they don’t want disseminated, the press won’t believe you and will pay no attention’.

Naturally, the Editor, realising that if ‘they’ thought he was dangerous, they must have something HUGE to hide, took the hint and has been pursuing these investigations intensively ever since. You need to understand that these intelligence personnel, in addition to being nasty pathological liars and deceivers, are also often extremely STUPID.

• MORE ABOUT GORDON THOMAS AND HIS GAMES AT THE FOOT OF THIS REPORT.

• Quote of the millennium:

‘The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11’.

At the FBI’s website, http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm, you will see that Osama bin Laden is wanted for a couple of crimes (flimsy evidence) but not the 9/11 attacks. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page (30), Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI made the classic statement cited above, which of course makes a complete mockery of the lies spewed out by the Bush Administration and the CIA concerning 9/11 and ‘The War on Terror’. If you go to the FBI’s website, note that the background is BLACK.

• FACT: ALL websites with a BLACK background, have a BLACK background for a reason: The background is BLACK because the organisations in question belong to the BLACK FORCES of Lucifer that we are confronting. There is absolutely NO NEED to have a BLACK background. It sends the intended signal, and the intended signal is BLACK. This is just an add-on observation.

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

• See also: Legal moves to sue those blocking the Settlements: 7th February report [Archive].

• The promised report showing that ALL SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. LAW (and indeed in ALL Common Law countries) has been superceded by this report, but will be presented as soon as practicable. Financial platform fraudsters have had it both ways so far: NO LONGER.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

THE SITUATION REGARDING THE TAX TAKEN ON 31ST DECEMBER 2009
On 12th February 2010, we advised that TAX having been deducted on 31st December 2009 from the Settlements funds, it was incumbent under US law for those concerned to pay out the funds from which the tax had been deducted within 45 days (viz.: 30 days plus the statutorily available extension of 15 days).

On the basis of premium information, and our own best information and belief, the funds from which the tax was taken on 31st December 2009 remain undisbursed. This being the case, those who are responsible are liable to extremely serious criminal penalties.

Many parties around the world have asked the Editor to provide ‘the answer’ to the matter which appeared to have been left up in the air following our report dated 12th February. On a matter such as this, we cannot possibly be expected to comment, let alone in knee-jerk fashion, until we have the necessary information to hand.

So, since the tax was taken on 31st December, and the payouts did not take place within the 45 days, and there is no related information to the effect that the tax taken out of the capital sum was restored to the capital sum within the 45-day period as should have occurred (at a minimum), what happened to the tax accruals (of $4.0 trillion to $4.2 trillion)? Was it placed out under contract in Brazil, for example? As we understand the situation, confidence in ‘paper’ is crashing everywhere, so the money may be ‘just sitting there’. $100 billion was peeled off and remitted to a false religious outfit, the identity of which is known to us, as we also reported on 12th February 2010.

LETTER TO THIS EDITOR FROM THE LAWYERS FOR THE CMKM VICTIMS
On 1st March 2010, the Editor received the letter displayed below, by Fedex, from Mr A. Clifton Hodges, the Attorney for the 50,000+ CMKM/CMKX victims [see reports dated 9th January, 29th January, 7th February and 12th February 2010: press ARCHIVE] who, following our introduction, is also fully cognisant of the matter of the stealing of the Deutsche Bank contract for $500 billion and electronic signature belonging to Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. which was illegally exploited as described in our report dated 7th February 2010, with the successive trading proceeds credited with Deutsche AG (formerly Barrington Investment Group), St Gallen, Switzerland. [See Appendix below for further detail from our report dated 7th February 2010).

The partners in Deutsche AG include Mikhail Gorbachev, former President of the Soviet Union, George H. W. Bush, former President of the United States, Dr Helmut Kohl, former Chancellor of Germany, and Dr Joseph Ackermann, CEO of Deutsche Bank AG..

Kohl, by the way, became the biggest holder of Young and Dawes Gold Certificates and of railroad certificates, and was notorious for his capacity to get hold of such certificates held by others and to procure their invalidation. The collection of Gold Certificates acquired by Kohl were never written off and never negated.

The letter from Mr A. Clifton Hodges to the Editor of this service reads as follows:

HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
A Professional Law Corporation
4 East Holly Street
Suite 202
Pasadena, CA 91103
Telephone: (626) 564-9797
Facsimile: (626) 564-9111

A. Clifton Hodges
James S. Kostas
Donald W. Ricketts*
* Of Counsel

February 26, 2010

Mr Christopher Story FRSA
Editor and Publisher
108 Horseferry Road
Westminster
London SW1P 2EF, UK

Re: US Domestic Settlement Funds Treasury Default

Dear Mr Story:

As we all labor to accomplish what we each hope will assist the financial world to return to a more constitutionally acceptable state, I write to enlist your assistance. I am informed and believe, as you have previously reported, that some $4.2 trillion was transferred to the US Treasury on December 31, 2009, as an initial payment of US taxes for the Domestic Settlement Funds.

New York State Law, United States Law and International Law all provide for criminal sanctions for failure to disburse Trust assets within an absolute maximum of 45 days after such a tax payment. That time period of 45 days expired at midnight on February 14, 2010. My further understanding is that the Trust assets remain undisbursed; accordingly, very serious criminal penalties have been incurred by those responsible for the continued failure to make these payments.

My clients and I are requesting your assistance in submitting this matter to Her Majesty The Queen, in hopes that she will direct her agents now present in this country to file a complaint that Interpol can act upon, and to have the MI-6 people take charge of getting this program finished.

My information is that the US Treasury still possesses these tax revenues [meaning of course that they have not been returned to the taxpayer] which in turn suggests that the US Government is in serious and substantial default.

You should be aware that I have also requested Mr William Bonney, whom I have been advised is a member of MI-9, to make a similar inquiry of The Queen.

I believe that, although you may not be directly in contact, you have sources and communication channels available to make this information and request known to Her Majesty. I know you to be a man of great integrity and of the highest moral standards; accordingly I am pleased and confident to leave this matter in your hands.

Thank you in advance and on behalf of my 50,000+ shareholders/clients.

Sincerely,
HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
[Signed]
A. Clifton Hodges

LETTER WAS LEAKED, AND HAS BEEN CIRCULATING BELOW THE RADAR
This letter to the Editor was leaked and has been in circulation since a faxed advance copy was made available to the Editor at the end of last week. Since it is known that Mr Hodges’ computers were compromised, it is possible that the letter was extracted by that means. Another possibility, suggested by Mr Hodges himself, is that one or more of his clients, who are reported to us to be beside themselves with fury at the scandal of 2.25 trillion CMKM/CMKX stock being floated via a platform from within the Securities and Exchange Commission itself under the George W. Bush Administration (between June 2004 and October 2005), leaked the letter, the top copy of which, as noted, arrived in London, at the Editor’s request, on 1st March 2010. The Editor asked for the top signed copy so that it could be forwarded as requested by Mr Hodges, which has now been done.

PARALLEL LETTER TO THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FROM THE LAWYERS FOR THE CMKM VICTIMS
Also on 26th February 2010, Mr A. Clifton Hodges, lawyer for the CMKM/CMKX plaintiffs, wrote to the Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York, as follows [Hodges and Associates’ coordinates as above]:

[Office of] The Attorney General of the State of New York
120 Broadway, 23rd Floor
New York, NY 10001

Dear Ms. Brown:

Thank you for speaking with me earlier today and explaining that Mr. Markowitz was out for the rest of the day. We discussed briefly the nature of my request and you suggested that I forward the appropriate information to your attention via e-mail for Mr. Markowitz’s review on his return Monday, March 1, 2010. The information is as follows:

• I am a California trial attorney with some 40 years’ experience in State and Federal Court, as well as other jurisdictions.

• In January of this year I filed a Bivens Class Action against the five sitting SEC Commissions and five past SEC Commissioners seeking some 3.87 Trillion Dollars in damages for the taking of property by unconstitutionally withholding consent to distribute such sums as had previously been collected for the benefit of 50,000 + shareholders of CMKM Diamonds, Inc.; a conformed copy of the complaint is attached.

• The SEC Office of General Counsel has agreed to accept service on behalf of the sitting Commissioners; the other commissioners are currently being served.

• The weight of opinion is that this litigation will not be allowed to proceed into the discovery stages and/or to trial; there is mounting evidence that a distribution of funds to the shareholders is on the near horizon.

• I am advised that a portion of trust funds previously earmarked for distribution to support the U.S. Domestic Settlement Fund Program currently in process were distributed to the United States Treasury facility in New York City on December 31, 2009 through and with the assistance of the New York Federal Reserve Bank in New York City.

• I am advised that these trust funds totaled 4.2 Trillion Dollars and were paid into the U.S. Treasury as and for taxes due to be paid from the trust(s) upon distribution of the trust assets.

• I am further advised that pursuant to Federal Banking Regulations, New York State Banking Regulations, and the Martin Act, inter alia, the transferred funds could be held without return for a maximum period of time under any circumstances for 45 days or until midnight February 14, 2010.

• I am further advised that the U.S. Treasury has not remitted these funds, is still possessed of these funds and more importantly the trust(s) assets have not been distributed.

• The above circumstances, upon proof, demonstrate serious criminal violations of the statutes referred to above.

• I represent, at least as the Class Counsel, a number of New York residents who are beneficiaries of these trust(s) and are among the 50,000 + shareholders.

• I know many of these people on a personal basis in addition to being their counsel of record and can attest to their severe and continuing damage suffered and being suffered as a result of the non-distribution and non-receipt of the aforementioned trust assets; some of them are also anxious to visit you in person and describe their continuing outrage.

Demand is hereby made that your office initiate, at the earliest possible time, an investigation into the criminal activities of those persons within your jurisdiction who have contributed to and have otherwise facilitated these criminal acts. I would be happy to discuss these facts with you at your early convenience. Please feel free to contact me directly at: (626) 564-9797. Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter.

A. Clifton Hodges (CSBN 046803)
HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
4 East Holly Street, Suite 202
Pasadena, CA 91103-3900

RELEVANT TEXT FROM OUR REPORT DATED 12TH FEBRUARY 2010
For the convenience of all concerned, the relevant portions of our report dated 12th February 2010 are now appended immediately below. With one exception, no editorial changes have been made by the Editor to the text as originally posted. It will now be appreciated that we could not elaborate on our report dated 12th February until this time:

As we reported earlier, the TAX was deducted from the Settlements monies effective from 31st December 2009. If we assume for current purposes that the Settlement monies aggregate about $14.0 trillion, then tax at 30% yields $4.2 trillion. In our report dated 28th December, we flagged the reported intent to divert $4.0 trillion of public funds [see Archive].

THE TWO SETS OF BOOKS
In order for diversion of funds to be ‘successful’, the source of the funds targeted for diversion must be obfuscated. These professional criminal financiers normally do this by creating two sets of books, which may entail two actual batches of cash, as in this case.

In the report dated 28th December 2009, we identified the second amount of about $4.0 trillion needed for this corrupt purpose. Specifically, it would consist of:

• The difference between the Debt Subject to Statutory Limit of $9,959,850 million for Fiscal Year 2008, which was raised in December 2009, to $12.4 trillion. The difference is $2.4 trillion. The 2010 Federal Budget documentation estimated that the 2010 Debt Subject to Statutory Limit would be raised to $12,843,344 million, representing an increase from the previous cap of $2,884 billion: so there’s another $400 billion in the wings.

• The debt cap of $400 billion previously applicable to the former GSEs (Government-Sponsored Enterprises), Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, was removed. Therefore, another $400 billion or so of official background debt based on Collateralised Debt Obligations and Collateralised Mortgage Obligations ‘can be’ floated, as the old cap has been discontinued.

• Obama’s 2,000+ page social engineering healthcare legislation will not only create brand new permanent cash pipelines, ripe for diversion by the kleptocracy into Fraudulent Finance trading operations, but will also be financed by an initial $1.0 trillion of ‘seed money’.

THERE’S THE DUPLICATED $4.2+ TRILLION
$2.9 trillion (taking the Statutory Debt Ceiling total estimated for FY 2010) plus $0.4 trillion from the removal of the cap applicable to the former GSEs plus the $1.0 trillion playmoney to be released with the Leninist healthcare legislation, yields $4.3 trillion = the counterpart to the diverted tax monies of approximately $4.2 trillion identified above.

TAX IS PAYABLE WITHIN 45 DAYS MAXIMUM OF PAYMENT
Now although the tax WAS taken from the Settlements monies effective 31st December – so that, as we pointed out, the taxes would be technically applicable to the 2009 calendar year – the hijacked Settlements payments had not been made by the time this report was posted.

Which may explain Clinton’s heart attack [see ‘mainstream’ reports], because:

• Taxes must be remitted within 30 days, plus an extension of 15 days, i.e. 45 days. Now 45 days after 31st December is Sunday 14th February 2010.

• The tax accruals that were taken out on 31st December have not been reflected in the US Treasury’s ledgers because these funds ‘appeared out of nowhere’. If the tax accruals from this source were to have been credited to the Treasury’s accounts, all the fancy creative accounting perpetrated by the Office of Management and Budget would be toast – as would all concerned, because the Treasury Secretary and everyone beneath him would be asked in unison:

‘What is the source of these funds?’

THE TREASURY SECRETARY CANNOT ANSWER THAT QUESTION
Neither the Treasury Secretary nor anyone else in authority can answer that question without lying; and they are not about to come clean and say: ‘The money on which the tax was based represents restitution monies to recompense victims for what officials and office-holders inside successive US Governments stole from them from 1984 onwards’.

THEY DIVERTED THE TAX MONEY, THEN PUT IT OUT
So the criminal financiers in the Treasury did what criminal financiers do: they diverted the money first, and then worked out what to do with it afterwards (in a manner of speaking). When they had decided what to do with the money, they:

• Bunged $100 billion of it to a well-known false-religion outside collaborating party, we’re told.

• Placed the bulk of it into contract: indeed we told you where they would be bunging it: into trading operations involving China Trust Bank (run by the ‘bad’ Chinese), Deutsche Bank, and Barclays Bank. As we know, Deutsche Bank AG is controlled by Dr Joseph Ackermann, who’s a partner in Deutsche AG (aka Barrington Investment Group) with Godfather George H. W. D. V. D. Bush Sr., Mikhail Gorbachëv (Orbach or Korbach), the former Soviet President who maintains a large office inside the Kremlin to this day, and Dr Helmut Kohl, former Chancellor of Germany.

• These are the three leading Illuminated Ones who created the scamming free-for-all stealing-fest with the take-down of the Soviet Union – the precursor to the second leg of the same intelligence operation: the take-down of the United States.

As we have also proved, these gentlemen (Financial Terrorists, rather) handle stolen funds, from which they benefit inter alia through their partnerships in Deutsche AG, St Gallen, Schweitz.

DIVERTED $4.2+ TRILLION WILL BECOME EMBEZZLED $4.3+ TRILLION
The problem here is that the Settlements MUST be paid out by midnight this Saturday, or else:

• The tax monies of approximately $4.2 trillion which have so far been diverted, will become EMBEZZLED FUNDS OVERNIGHT by Sunday morning 14th February 2010, which is to say:

• The criminal financiers holding highest offices will stand accused of having STOLEN $4.2+ trillion (approximately) from the US taxpayer – since these funds should be credited to the US Treasury’s books, and those who have been stealing and fiddling the books should face the consequences (the rest of their lives in jail, or execution at dawn for embezzlement in time of war).

• Alternatively, the diverted tax monies will need to have been recredited to the bank accounts holding the hijacked Settlements funds on 14th February at the very latest.

EMBEZZLEMENT OF $4.2+ TRILLION OF TAXPAYERS’ FUNDS
So, in the prevailing context, if we ask the straightforward question: ‘What are they covering up?’, we wind up with the following answers:

(1): An intent to embezzle $4.3 trillion of tax accruals belonging to the US taxpayer.

(2): If they don’t pay out the Settlements funds by midnight on 13th February 2010, a TECHNICAL DEFAULT BY THE U.S. TREASURY, as well; with the $4.3 trillion of tax monies belonging to the US taxpayer, ‘missing’: a US Government ‘insider’ scandal even bigger than CMKM/CMKX.

APPENDIX:
Former President Mikhail S. Gorbachev, working with former US President George H. W. Bush Sr., former German Chancellor Helmut Kohl and Dr Joseph Ackermann, all partners in Deutsche AG (formerly called Barrington Investment Group), Switzerland, stole a contract using the electronic tag to the securities account owned by Michael C. Cottrell’s Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., with Benchmark Securities, In., New Jersey, at a table-top meeting in Geneva on 7th October 2002 by the means described below, which included the electronic ‘forging’ of Mr Cottrell’s signature.

This theft was preceded by seven related thefts from Mr Cottrell’s firm’s securities account.

This means that former President Mikhail Gorbachev and former German Chancellor Helmut Kohl are financial criminals like George H. B. Bush Sr. and should be treated accordingly. Mr Gorbachev and Helmut Kohl have, as partners in Deutsche AG, by definition been profiting from the theft of Mr Cottrell’s contract and property, and also, as further revealed below, from proceeds from the theft of The Queen’s gold, which, we were informed at 1.15 am on 4th February 2010, have likewise been channelled through Deutsche AG, Switzerland. As of 2nd February 2010 [and as of 2nd March 2010: Editor], The Queen’s gold had not been restored.

• The proceeds of innumerable corrupt transactions involving these characters have been run through the DVD’s main institutions, Deutsche Bank and Dresdner Bank. So what is being exposed is that George H. W. Bush Sr. (CIA/DVD) and Mikhail Gorbachev (Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) and KGB/FSB) have been ransacking American and non-American victims alike, and running this colossal open-ended racketeering through Germany, with the assistance of the former STASI of East Germany (who are GESTAPO in relabelled clothing). Hence the presence on the scene of STASI operatives such as Eva Teleki, a Swedish opera singer, and other operatives suspected of being continuing STASI agents, such as Chancellor Angela Merkel (the former Secretary of the Agitation and Propaganda Department of the Young Communists at Marx Lenin University, in East Berlin). This explains why Merkel was earlier fingered by this service as guardian in Germany of George Bush Sr.’s stolen and exploited racketeering assets with German institutions.

THE JAILING OF THE FORMER GOVERNOR OF THE BANK OF ENGLAND
In the summer of 2007, we reported that the former Governor of the Bank of England, Lord ‘Eddie’ George, had been arrested and briefly jailed. We further reported that the former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, Dr Alan Greenspan, had been arrested and jailed in June 2007 for a limited period of time (it is believed he has in fact been arrested several times). Greenspan served as the financial technician and engineer for George Bush Senior’s financial scamming and stealing ops.

We did not receive a letter from the late Lord George’s solicitors. We published this information in International Currency Review in 2007. Lord George died aged 70 in April 2009.

At 1.45pm on 2nd February 2010, the Editor made renewed enquiries in the course of a telephone call to the United States concerning the scandal of the stealing of The Queen’s gold, which took place during an unnanounced UK banking sector ‘blackout’ on Friday and Saturday 29th and 30th March 2007. In late January 2010, the Editor had re-established from ‘inside’ sources that the gold had NOT been restored. In answer to the Editor’s question on 2nd February, our US party stated:

‘They stole The Queen’s gold in London, not in the United States. Her Majesty can therefore prosecute the perpetrators in Britain and Europe’.

Even as this statement was being made, the transatlantic telephone line was JAMMED, JUST LIKE WHAT USED TO HAPPEN DURING THE COLD WAR. On restoring contact via another phone call, the Editor reiterated to his party what we have had occasion to state many times before: namely, that each time these people interfere with our communications blatantly like this, they simply confirm the accuracy and the direct and immediate relevance of what was being discussed.

The Editor was later informed by the same impeccable source that ‘the former Governor of the Bank of England, collaborating with the US criminals at the highest levels [the Bush/CIA/DVD Crime Syndicate via Greenspan], quote ‘exchanged The Queen’s gold for derivative pieces of paper, which are worthless’. Which explains why we did not receive a letter from Lord George’s solicitors.

It also explains the considerable alarm which arose after the Editor had to sever contact with a US operative on 15th May 2007 who, having been informed by the Editor that ‘the US Government has stolen The Queen’s gold’, arrogantly retorted: I find that hard to believe’.

• GORDON THOMAS: AGENT OF INFLUENCE AND AGENT OF DUPLICITY?
As indicated at the top of this report, Gordon Thomas is the author of the classically duplicitous statement (in the context explained by the Editor above): ‘It doesn’t matter that it’s not true. All that matters is that it’s out there’. Mr Thomas was very happy to convey this information to the Editor, having explained that MI-6 were bearing false witness against the Editor, to ‘make you sit up’.

The Editor duly ‘sat up’ in a manner not anticipated by the rather stupid operatives involved, in that this episode had the effect, as explained, of galvanising the Editor of this service to redouble his efforts to expose the rampant financial criminality that is destroying civilisation worldwide.

But here’s another little trick that Gordon Thomas played on the Editor of this service. Some years ago, the Editor made the mistake of writing an article for American Free Press, not knowing (at the time) that is outfit was the revamped SPOTLIGHT, a notoriously anti-semitic CIA ‘pod’, having the remit of running the anti-semitic compartment of the dialectic. The CIA maintains ‘Black’ cadres targeted at every key element; for instance, the LaRouche operation specialises in attacking the British and blaming Britain for everything. SPOTLIGHT blamed the Jews for everything.

Naturally, these shifty people didn’t pay the Editor the money he was owed for writing the article in question when they should have done; so the Editor appeared physically at their offices to collect a cheque, by prior arrangement. While he was in the office of the controller of this CIA operation, the phone rang. It was some journalist on The Daily Telegraph. This was a set-up: organised by Gordon Thomas on behalf of MI-6. The journalist had nothing much to say, said he would call this Editor the next day and of course never did.

The purpose of this operation was to ‘inform’ The Daily Telegraph staff that Mr Story works with a rabidly anti-semitic organ (untrue), without of course informing the Telegraph journalists that the publication in question is a ‘pod’ of the CIA. And the deeper rationale was to make absolutely sure that the results of this Editor’s truly devastating (for the criminalised intelligence cadres) findings would never receive any coverage in The Daily Telegraph. NASTY.

• Gordon Thomas ‘fixed’ this deception for MI-6

The other day, Gordon Thomas filled a whole page of The Daily Telegraph with an article on the Israeli operation using stolen or fabricated British passports. Since the Editor of this service has personal experience of the duplicitous behaviour of Gordon Thomas, all concerned are advised that any article by this person needs to be considered in the context of his duplicitous behaviour towards the Editor of this service. A journalist who deceives in real life, or acts as an agent for an intelligence service engaged in a deliberate deception operation against a loyal taxpaying patriot, may be liable to deceive in his articles. Since this Editor used to have large op-ed articles in The Daily Telegraph himself in the 1970s and early 1980s, these rather basic toxic facts have a certain resonance that may even penetrate the dark corridors in Vauxhall and Buckingham Palace Road.

The ultimate losers in this particular context will be The Daily Telegraph. This newspaper has failed to cover the biggest criminal finance investigation in history, and is thus in blatant dereliction of its duty as Fourth Estate to hold authorities firmly to account for their systematic flouting of the Rule of Law. We for our part will continue to do just that: official parties that haven’t got the message, in both London and Beijing, cannot expect to be spared the necessary exposures. They won’t be.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time AMENDING AND INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE. In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS STICKS IT TO THE 9/11 CRIMINALS

cropped-chrisstory

THE 9/11 MASS MURDER IS EXPLODING IN THEIR DIRTY FACES

Monday 1 March 2010 02:00

EDITOR’S COMMENT: WE HARDLY EVER USE THIS PRIVILEGED SPACE TO PROMULGATE THE WORK OF OTHER ANALYSTS, AS WE HAVE SO MUCH TO DEVELOP FROM OUR OWN SOURCES.

HOWEVER THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE BY PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS, A FORMER ASSISTANT SECRETARY TO THE U.S. TREASURY, REQUIRES IMMEDIATE DISSEMINATION, SO WE ARE DELIGHTED TO HAND OUR SPACE OVER TO HIM. LIKE THE EDITOR, ROBERTS TELLS THE TRUTH, AND REMAINS VERTICAL. THE TIME IS LONG PAST FOR COWARDLY EQUIVOCATION.

• FACT: AS WE HAVE REPORTED, SOME 12,000 PEOPLE DIED IN THE TWIN TOWERS, NOT 3,000.

• ON A PARALLEL NOTE, WE WILL SHORTLY PRESENT COMPREHENSIVE AND CONCLUSIVE LEGAL EVIDENCE THAT ALL, REPEAT ALL (I.E. 100%) SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL, REPEAT ILLEGAL, UNDER U.S LAW, WHICH MEANS THAT ALL THE CONVOLUTED ARRANGEMENTS MADE BY THE TREASURY AND THE FEDERAL RESERVE TO ACCOMMODATE DUBIOUS SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS, AND ALL THE NEW ARRANGEMENTS BEING MADE AT BREAKNECK SPEED TO RESUME OR INTENSIFY SECURITISATION OPERATIONS (FRAUDULENT FINANCE) TRADING, ARE ILLEGAL, REPEAT ILLEGAL, UNDER U.S. LAW. THERE ARE NO REDEEMING FEATURES.

By Paul Craig Roberts
Former Assistant Secretary to US Treasury
2-25-10

The Washington Times is a newspaper that looks with favor upon the Bush/Cheney/Obama/neocon wars of aggression in the Middle East and favors making terrorists pay for 9/11. Therefore, I was surprised to learn on February 24 that the most popular story on the paper’s website for the past three days was the “Inside the Beltway” report, “Explosive News”, about the 31 press conferences in cities in the US and abroad on February 19 held by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, an organization of professionals which now has 1,000 members.

I was even more surprised that the news report treated the press conference seriously. How did three World Trade Center skyscrapers suddenly disintegrate into fine dust?

How did massive steel beams in three skyscrapers suddenly fail as a result of short-lived, isolated, and low temperature fires?

“A thousand architects and engineers want to know, and are calling on Congress to order a new investigation into the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7”, reports the newspaper.

The paper reports that the architects and engineers have concluded that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) provided “insufficient, contradictory and fraudulent accounts of the circumstances of the towers’ destruction” and are “calling for a grand jury investigation of NIST officials”.

The newspaper reports that Richard Gage, the spokesperson for the architects and engineers said: “Government officials will be notified that “Misprision of Treason,’ US Code 18 (Sec. 2382) is a serious Federal offense, which requires those with evidence of treason to act. The implications are enormous and may have profound impact on the forthcoming Khalid Sheik Mohammed trial”.

There is now an organization, Firefighters for 9/11 Truth. At the main press conference in San Francisco, Eric Lawyer,the head of that organization, announced the firefighters’ support for the architects and engineers’ demands.

He reported that no forensic investigation was made of the fires that are alleged to have destroyed the three buildings and that this failure constitutes a crime.

Mandated procedures were not followed, and instead of being preserved and investigated, the crime scene was destroyed.

He also reported that there exist more than one hundred first responders who heard and experienced explosions and that there is radio, audio and video evidence of explosions.

Also at the press conference, physicist Steven Jones presented the evidence of Nano-Thermite in the residue of the WTC buildings found by an international panel of scientists led by University of Copenhagen nano-chemist Professor Niels Harrit.

Nano-Thermite is a high-tech explosive/pyrotechnic capable of instantly melting steel girders.

Before we yell “conspiracy theory,” we should be aware that the architects, engineers, firefighters, and scientists offer no theory. They provide evidence that challenges the official theory.

This evidence is not going to go away.

If expressing doubts or reservations about the official story in the 9/11 Commission Report makes a person a conspiracy theory kook, then we have to include in this category both co-chairmen of the 9/11 Commission and the Commission’s legal counsel, all of whom have written books in which they clearly acknowledge that they were lied to by Government officials when they conducted their investigation, or, rather, when they presided over the investigation conducted by the Executive Director, Philip Zelikow, a member of President George W. Bush’s transition team and Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board and a co-author of Bush Secretary of State Condi “Mushroom” Rice.

There will always be Americans who will believe whatever the government tells them no matter how many times they know the government has lied to them.

Despite expensive wars that threaten Social Security and Medicare, wars based on non-existent Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, non-existent Saddam Hussein connections to al Qaida, non-existent Afghan participation in the 9/11 attacks, and the non-existent Iranian nuclear weapons that are being hyped as the reason for the next American war of aggression in the Middle East, more than half of the U.S. population still believes the fantastic story that the Government has told them about 9/11, a Muslim conspiracy that outwitted the entire Western world.

Moreover, it doesn’t matter to these Americans how often the Government changes its story.

For example, Americans first heard of Osama bin Laden because the Bush regime pinned the 9/11 attacks on him. Over the years video after video was served up to the gullible American public of bin Laden’s pronouncements. Experts dismissed these videos as fakes, but Americans remained their gullible selves. Then suddenly last year a new 9/11 “mastermind” emerged to take bin Laden’s place, the captive Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the detainee who was waterboarded 183 times until he confessed to masterminding the 9/11 attack.

In the Middle Ages confessions extracted by torture constituted evidence, but self-incrimination has been a no-no in the U.S. legal system since our founding. But with the Bush regime and the Republican federal judges, whom we were assured would defend the U.S. Constitution, the self-incrimination of Sheik Mohammed stands today as the only evidence the U.S. government has that Muslim terrorists pulled off 9/11.

If you consider the feats attributed to Khalid Sheik Mohammed, they are simply unbelievable. Sheik Mohammed is a more brilliant, capable superhero than V in the fantasy movie, “V for Vendetta”. Sheik Mohammed outwitted all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies along with those of all U.S. allies or puppets, including Israel’s Mossad.

No intelligence service on earth, or all of them combined, was a match for Sheik Mohammed.

Sheik Mohammed outwitted the U.S. National Security Council, Dick Cheney, the Pentagon, the State Department, NORAD, the U.S. Air Force, and Air Traffic Control. He caused Airport Security to fail four times in one morning. He caused the state-of-the-art air defenses of the Pentagon to fail, allowing a hijacked airliner, which was off course all morning while the U.S. Air Force, for the first time in history, was unable to get aloft intercepter aircraft, to crash into the Pentagon.

Sheik Mohammed was able to perform these feats with unqualified pilots.

Sheik Mohammed, even as a waterboarded detainee, has managed to prevent the Federal Bureau of Investigation from releasing the many confiscated videos that would show, according to the official story, the hijacked airliner hitting the Penagon.

How naive do you have to be to believe that any human, or for that matter Hollywood fantasy character, is this powerful and capable?

If Sheik Mohammed has these superhuman capabilities, how did the incompetent Americans catch him? This guy is a patsy tortured into confession in order to keep the American naifs believing the government’s conspiracy theory.

What is going on here is that the US government has to bring the 9/11 mystery to an end. The Government must put on trial and convict a culprit so that it can close the case before it explodes. Anyone waterboarded 183 times would confess to anything.

The US government has responded to the evidence being arrayed against its outlandish 9/11 conspiracy theory by redefining the war on terror from external to internal enemies. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said on February 21 that American extremists are now as big a concern as international terrorists. Extremists, of course, are people who get in the way of the government’s agenda, such as the 1,000 Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

The group used to be 100, now it is 1,000. What if it becomes 10,000?

Cass Sunstein, an Obama regime official, has a solution for the 9/11 skeptics: Infiltrate them and provoke them into statements and actions that can be used to discredit or to arrest them. But get rid of them at all cost.

Why employ such extreme measures against alleged kooks if they only provide entertainment and laughs? Is the government worried that they are on to something?

Instead, why doesn’t the US Government simply confront the evidence that is presented and answer it?

If the architects, engineers, firefighters, and scientists are merely kooks, it would be a simple matter to acknowledge their evidence and refute it.

Why is it necessary to infiltrate them with police agents and to set them up?

Many Americans would reply that “their” government would never even dream of killing Americans by hijacking airliners and destroying buildings in order to advance a government agenda. But on February 3, National Intelligence Director Dennis Blair told the House Intelligence Committee that the US government can assassinate its own citizens when they are overseas. No arrest, trial, or conviction of a capital crime is necessary. Just straight out murder.

Obviously, if the US government can murder its citizens abroad it can murder them at home, and has done so. For example, 100 Branch Davidians were murdered in Waco, Texas, by the Clinton administration for no legitimate reason. The government just decided to use its power knowing that it could get away with it, which it did.

Americans who think “their” government is some kind of morally pure operation would do well to familiarize themselves with Operation Northwoods. Operation Northwoods was a plot drawn up by the US Joint Chiefs of Staff for the CIA to commit acts of terrorism in American cities and fabricate evidence blaming Castro so that the US could gain domestic and international support for regime change in Cuba. The secret plan was nixed by President John F. Kennedy and was declassified by the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Review Board.

It is available online in the National Security Archive. There are numerous online accounts available, including Wikipedia. James Bamford’s book, Body of Secrets, also summarizes the plot:

“Operation Northwoods, which had the written approval of the Chairman [Gen. Lemnitzer] and every member of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war”.

Prior to 9/11 the American neoconservatives were explicit that the wars of aggression that they intended to launch in the Middle East required “a new Pearl Harbor”.

For their own good and that of the wider world, Americans need to pay attention to the growing body of experts who are telling them that the government’s account of 9/11 fails their investigation. 9/11 launched the neoconservative plan for US world hegemony.

As I write, the US government is purchasing the agreement of foreign governments that border Russia to accept US missile interceptor bases. The US intends to ring Russia with US missile bases from Poland through central Europe and Kosovo to Georgia, Azerbaijan and central Asia.

US envoy Richard Holbrooke declared on February 20 2010 that al Qaida is moving into former Central Asian constituent parts of the Soviet Union, such as Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and Kazakhstan. Holbrooke is soliciting US bases in these former Soviet Republics under the guise of the ever-expanding “war on terror”.

The United States has already encircled Iran with military bases. The US government intends to neutralize China by seizing control over the Middle East and cutting China off from oil.

This plan assumes that Russia and China, nuclear armed states, will be intimidated by US anti-missile defenses and will acquiesce in US hegemony and that China will lack oil for its industries and military.

The US government is delusional. Russian military and political leaders have responded to the obvious threat by declaring NATO a direct threat to the security of Russia and by announcing a change in Russian war doctrine to the pre-emptive launch of nuclear weapons. The Chinese are too confident to be bullied by a washed-up American “superpower”.

The morons in Washington are pushing the envelope of nuclear war.

The insane drive for American hegemony threatens life on earth. The American people, by accepting the lies and deceptions of “their” government, are facilitating this outcome.

‘WHY ARE WE IN AFGHANISTAN?’ QUESTION UNANSWERED

BRITISH MINISTRY OF DEFENCE DIDN’T BOTHER TO RESPOND

Monday 17 November 2008 17:15

OBVIOUSLY THEY COULDN’T ANSWER THE QUESTION WITHOUT LYING

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

On 2nd October 2008, the Editor sent the following email to the British Ministry of Defence under the heading [see Archive]:

London, 2nd October 2008:

EDITOR ASKS BRITISH MINISTRY OF DEFENCE WHAT WE ARE DOING IN AFGHANISTAN

‘Please provide me with a written statement indicating what specifically BRITISH national interests (NOT international interests) are served by our operations in Afghanistan, with specific reference to the drug trade.

Please further confirm in writing that the British authorities are not engaged in any way in drug-trafficking, or in facilitating drug trafficking in connection with their operations in Afghanistan, and that the British authorities are not supporting drug-trafficking operations known to be conducted by elements of other foreign intelligence and military services operating in Afghanistan.

Manifestly, if other foreign forces operating in Afghanistan are engaged in drug operations, we should be fighting them, or we should not be there at all.

Please be advised that we will unfortunately not be content with a Public Relations bromide response concerning this matter, given that we have information which will be compared with your necessary written reply.

When we last embarked upon an enquiry on this subject by telephone, we were moved around from pillar to post and were more or less fobbed off with some statement about vague international cooperation, which of course missed the point of the enquiry.

So this time round, we are requesting a written response to my address, please.

As taxpayers for 40+ years I and my firm are entitled to know how you are spending our money and whether there is any abuse along the lines outlined here.

We need this for clarification when explaining to our readers what we are supposed to be doing in Afghanistan and in order to dispel well-informed data to the effect that we may be engaged in protecting or facilitating drug operations and distribution.

Self-evidently, ALL government involvement in ‘Black’ drug operations is inexcusable, despicable and Luciferian. Accordingly, they must be exposed.

No doubt you will be as keen to dispel any ‘misunderstandings’ that may exist on this score, as we are. Thank you’.

Christopher Story FRSA
cstory@worldreports.org

NO REPLY RECEIVED AT THE DATE OF THIS POSTING
As of this date, the Ministry of Defence (MOD) has not had the courtesy either to acknowledge receipt of the foregoing email, or to reply to the issues raised.

The MOD’s website waffles: ‘As you can appreciate, MOD Ministers receive hundreds of letters, faxes and emails every week. Unfortunately, it is not practical for them to respond to all of this correspondence personally. However, all the messages submitted via this web form are read by staff in the Ministry of Defence and Ministers regularly receive reports on the issues raised’.

‘Please note that we cannot reply by email: you must include a postal address in the comments section below’ [which of course the Editor did].

This official text carefully omitted, naturally, to state that every communication would receive a response, let alone be acknowledged. However in view of the gravity of the issues raised in the Editor’s letter, any reasonable person might have assumed that it would have been sensible to respond to this communication, not least since the same reasonable person would be liable to believe that British military power has not been projected in Afghanistan to protect the drug trade.

The tactful procedure in these situations is to presume that official motivations are respectable (which the Editor did not do in this instance).

God forbid, therefore, that they should be criminal. Perish the thought.

HOWEVER…
Since the British Ministry of Defence has refrained from even acknowledging this enquiry, and more than seven weeks have gone by since the email was sent, the Editor is now ENTITLED, given the MOD’s silence, to draw the following obvious conclusions:

• The British Ministry of Defence could not write to the Editor to deny that our British forces are operating in Afghanistan to defend and help control the heroin poppy crop because that is precisely what they are there for.

• To lie about this would have progressively more devastating consequences for the MOD, given that the families of dead British soldiers would have every incentive to sue the Government for deploying their offspring to Afghanistan on the basis of a false and criminal prospectus.

• The British Ministry of Defence may have decided that it would far be too dangerous to respond at all, given this Editor’s uncomfortable habit of refusing to be bamboozled by officials whose life styles are sustained by the taxes we productive people pay to keep them in the comfort zones to which they are accustomed.

• By adopting this cowardly stance, the MOD laid itself open to the likelihood that the Editor of this service would have to conclude that British military power and resources are most certainly being deployed in Afghanistan to protect the heroin crop, which had been all but closed down when the hated Taliban were in control there.

• And indeed, THIS IS THE ONLY POSSIBLE CONCLUSION to be drawn from the MOD’s extreme arrogance on this score. No response AT ALL to the Editor’s letter = a tacit acknowledgment that the Editor’s necessary conclusion is CORRECT.

• FACT: The Editor’s father, the late Colonel Henry Harle Story MC, fought through the whole of the two Illuminati Wars (1914-1918 and 1939-1945), surviving both.

• FACT: He fought in order to purchase freedom inter alia for the complacent and arrogant officials who inhabit the corridors of the Ministry of Defence, which, given its evidently cowardly decision not to respond to the Editor’s email, has laid itself wide open to the accusation that is repeated here: YOU APPEAR TO BE ENGAGED IN CRIMINAL OPERATIONS the purpose of which may be to hold onto and assure control over the ‘Black’ money flowing from the heroin trade, which is known to be used inter alia to finance ‘Black Ops’ in furtherance of an internationalist agenda that has NOTHING whatsoever to do with BRITISH NATIONAL DEFENCE.

• If you were interested in UK NATIONAL DEFENCE, you and your duplicitous criminalist allies in the corrupt American structures would have CLOSED DOWN the Afghani drug business years ago.

• FACT: The REASON that Britain is flooded with drugs, as was vividly portrayed in the disturbing supplement on this subject published with The Observer newspaper on 16th October 2008, is that GOVERNMENTS, or rogue elements of the corrupt intelligence services thereof (in Britain’s case, Government Operations – 2, or GO-2) ARE THEMSELVES ENGAGED IN THE DRUG BUSINESS.

Now the British Ministry of Defence is identified as PROTECTING THE GLOBAL DRUG TRADE.

It will be interesting, will it not, to see whether the MOD, perhaps stung out of its moral torpor by this report, will SUDDENLY refute this Editor’s accusation, given that this very powerful (thanks to YOUR support) website is making such an extremely serious accusation.

But don’t bet on it. The MOD will probably continue with its policy of pretending that there isn’t a problem. In which case, folks, YOU MAY REST ASSURED that we will be returning to this subject with redoubled outrage and anger in the none too distant future. The Editor’s father didn’t fight through two Illuminati Wars to enable these reprobate officials and political hacks to facilitate the poisoning of our own people with drugs, as appears to be the case. He would be OUTRAGED.

• FACT: On 15th November, the Editor heard an interestingly deceitful weasel ‘rationalisation’ of this issue. It goes as follows: the heroin trade is being kept out of the hands of the Taliban because if it was allowed to fall back into their hands, the war in Afghanistan would continue forever. The only problems with this gross ‘rationalisation’ are that (a) the Taliban almost eliminated the drug trade while it was in control; and (b) the volume of drugs produced by Afghanistan since the United States and Britain arrived there to ‘fight the Taliban’ on the pretext of curbing scope for ‘terrorism’, has, as is universally known, gone through the roof.

• FACT: You will also be aware, to change the subject slightly, that US and UK ‘mainstream’ media outlets, and certain controlled ‘Psy-Ops’ websites that specialise in MARKETING FEAR, continue to speak of Osama Bin Laden in the present tense, and also in the context of rumoured and allegedly intended ‘Osama’ atrocities, notwithstanding that Osama Bin Laden, a.k.a. the CIA’s old asset ‘Tim Osman’, departed this mortal coil on 26th December 2001, as several times reported by this service and long since authoritatively reconfirmed.

• FACT: The reason that this ‘Black’ CIA ghoul is kept ‘virtually’ alive is that if his virtual existence were to be negated for public consumption by acknowledgment of his actual demise seven years ago, VERY GRIEVOUS UNANSWERED QUESTIONS about mass murders would require IMMEDIATE responses: which the two criminal REVOLUTIONARY Governments of the United States and Britain are not about to provide, for fear that certain of their number might deservedly wind up like Stalin’s victims, namely with a bullet through the temples: or should we say, dangling from those notorious lamp posts referenced by the contemporary manifestation of the Devil Incarnate, mega-drug baron, money launderer, giga-financial bandit, practitioner of deception and ‘Black Arts’ on a global scale, double-cross merchant, inventor of the Greenspan-Bush-Clinton Crime Nexus ‘Never-Pay’ Theft Syndrome, CORRUPTER OF THE NATIONS AND THE VATICAN, the destroyer of America, World Revolution gauleiter and murderous Godfather, DVD Chieftain George Herbert Walker BUSH Sr..

REPORTS IN PREPARATION
The Editor has refrained from reporting on the Settlements and associated issues since the end of October for a number of reasons. First, this website is an add-on to our long-established financial, economic and general intelligence publications and books, which take priority at all times.

On returning from the United States in late October, the Editor had to attend to urgent business associated with these publishing activities, which have continued without a break since 1970. In this context, we will very shortly be publishing new issues of the following services:

International Currency Review [Volume 34, Number 1], on the international financial corruption crisis and its global consequences and evolution, with a detailed events narrative.

Soviet Analyst [Volume 30, Number 10], which inter alia leads with an article entitled ‘Criminalist ‘blowback’ against the U.S. follows rape of the USSR’.

Arab-Asian Affairs [Volume 32, Number 4]: ‘ONI Operative Vreeland was correct’ (in respect of his understanding of the underlying causes and sources of the world crisis, although he is a criminal, and extremely dangerous when ‘not on his meds’). Understanding Vreeland presupposes a basic comprehension of how the ‘Black’ US MK-ULTRA-type forces go about the splitting of personalities so as to create operatives who will do their filthy bidding when ‘triggered’.

The Latin American Times: ‘Belize: Overcoming a bad legacy’, on the interesting developments in this former British Territory, where a new broom has been confronting local (and US) corruption.

Other issues of our serials print titles, especially Economic Intelligence Review, London Currency Report and Interest Rate Service, are currently also in preparation.

Secondly, we have in fact acquired access to sensitive intelligence which will be publicised in a forthcoming report. For various reasons that we cannot go into here, it was deemed appropriate to withhold publication of this information pending certain further developments: and we are close to the end of this period. So, as soon as the new Settlements-related report is ready, it will be posted.

DETAILED REPORT ON THE HISTORY AND EVOLUTION OF FRAUDULENT FINANCE
Finally, as previously indicated, our wide-ranging analysis of the US-driven fraudulent finance epidemic has been in preparation for some time.

This is a very demanding task. Specifically, we will be providing a detailed analysis and history of the Credit Default Swap scam and fraud model, from the BCCI operation under the Bush Crime Family, to the Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae takeover which was perpetrated in order to obfuscate fraudulent finance operations controlled by the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ for the ‘benefit’ of their associated slush fund entities headed by A.I.G. and the Carlyle Group.

This important study will explain how the fraudulent finance epidemic developed, and WHY it is fraudulent, beginning with a speech delivered by Bevis Longstreth delivered on 8th April 1983 at the ‘American Assembly’ at Columbia University in New York. That presentation described almost precisely what was intended, and recommended the fraudulent finance model that ensued.

Our report will further expose the routine use of deceptive terminology to obfuscate fraudulent transactions. The originator and expert consultant for this project is the US Securities Markets expert Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., with editing, elaboration, publishing and marketing skills added by the Editor of this service and our printing, publishing and global distribution resources. The report is expected to be published in the New Year.

It will be made available to our paid-up subscribers, and will also be available, when paid for but NOT otherwise, to the international financial community generally. This is a commercial enterprise, and we retain our total independence thanks to the fact that we are financed by our subscribers.

REITERATION OF THE STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND KEY FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ARE IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

REFINANCING THE WORLD AND REFLOATING THE U.S. DOLLAR

WORLD COMMUNITY CONFRONTS THE WELTKRIMINALGESELLSCHAFT

Friday 9 May 2008 01:04

UPDATE, 10TH MAY 2008: Please see the new section immediately below headed:
SPECULATING ON THE OIL PRICE: HOW THE ‘BOX GANG’ AIMS TO GET ITS MONEY BACK

THE CURTAIN FALLS AT THE END OF ‘ACT ONE’ OF DIE MEISTERSCHWINDLERN

EXPLANATION OF OUR TERMINATION OF THE WANTAGATE REPORTS

MICHAEL C. COTTRELL M.S. CEASED TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH WANTA IN MARCH 2008

INTELLIGENCE ON THE PROGRESS OF THE $300 TRILLION SETTLEMENTS

PRESIDENT KENNEDY’S EXECUTIVE ORDER 11110 AND THE PRESENT CRISIS

9/11 MASS MURDERS PERPETRATED SO AS TO KILL THE REFORMATION ACT

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press ARCHIVE. Order your subscriptions and our ‘politically incorrect’, hence correct, intelligence books from the Edward Harle segment.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• The white panel below NEWS gives details of our intel titles/books as they are published.

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing financial global corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. The Editor’s $35,000 Wanta bail-out money has been stolen.

THE CURTAIN FALLS AT THE END OF ‘ACT ONE’
As the curtain falls at the end of Act One of Die Meisterschwindlern, by Greenspoon (libretto by Busche), Unterreichsführer Reinhard B. Himmler, handler-in-chief for the Weltkriminalgesellschaft Bushe und Klintenstein, GmbH, DC and Dachau, contemplates the coming intermission with such trepidation as a perfectly possessed master operative with no soul is capable of.

(Hydraulics activating the descending curtain, by the way, courtesy of Wantagate, Inc., WI, purveyors of lethal exposure lubricants).

Seated next to Herr Himmler in the ‘Royal Box’ behind a decidedly necessary reinforced protective bullet-proof screen (as no-one knows how many infuriated Ponzi scam victims may be sitting in the auditorium) is the diminutive Führer himself, evidently somewhat the worse for wear, who, having lost the plot of the entire opera(tion) from the outset, has been compulsively fiddling around with the greyscreen monetary manipulation console that he had commandeered in or around June 2006 or earlier from the ‘late’ Hauptfinanzminister Heinrich Paulsohn, or else calling up the Virtual Wars and Virtual Rumours of Wars Department located at the Zentrum für Schrechtlichkeit Georg H. W. Busche, Langley and McLean, to order more virtual diversionary ploys while he contemplates the collapse of his Kriminalreich and of his disastrous and murderous period in office.

Occasionally, his distracted mind wanders back to those carefree days of his youth when blowing up live frogs with firecrackers was his favoured preoccupation.

To his right sits Frau Laura, who has been driven over from the Four Seasons Hotel after flying back, in a hurry, as usual from Dubai, for the occasion.

Unterreichsführer Himmler (Cheney) has meanwhile been racking his addled brain to come up with further deceptions and lies so as to delay, frustrate or abort the global refinancing Settlements.

As is described below, on Wednesday 7th May, his disinformation apparat disseminated a menu of lies and distortions, while the Unterreichsführer himself reportedly suffered another humiliation (as also reported below) when, US sources say, he sought yet again to interfere with the Settlements, which should have been concluded two weeks earlier. Despite appearances to the contrary, none of these belated attempts to frustrate the payouts, which were mandated by the Group of Seven at their meeting held during the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings on Sunday the 13th April 2008, have been successful; and the very latest intelligence available to the Editor of this service on 9th/10th April was that there were no impediments to completion.

The US sources told the Editor that the ‘riot act’ was read to him during a visit to Philadelphia the next day – a manifestly absurd procedure, as this has happened many times before, to no effect. Reading the riot act to this criminal is like offering him a tissue with which to blow his nose. Such hardened criminal meister-operatives are never susceptible to reasoned warnings of any kind.

In Philadelphia, we were told, Cheney tried yet again to interfere with the Settlements, possibly visiting one or more financial institutions there. But it was also reported that he delivered a ten-minute speech to about 100 workers at a Northeast Philadelphia plant which is printing the so-called ‘economic stimulus checks’, which is the operation that has been mounted to provide the necessary ‘explanation’ for the forthcoming economic rebound. When this happens, people will want to know WHY. The real answer will be that the Settlements have been released, but this will never be mentioned. Instead, the ‘economic stimulus checks’ being paid out to about 130 million Americans (by way also of an election bribe) will be hailed as an act of magnanimity on the part of Der Führer for which the 130 million beneficiaries should all be truly grateful. Cheney told workers that these payments represented ‘a shot of energy at the right time (i.e., election time) and in the right way’. The Untereichsführer’s peroration was delivered at the Philadelphia Regional Financial Center, one of four centres nationwide that are issuing some 88 million checks between now and July. More to the point here, this facility is a component of the US Treasury Department’s Financial Management Service, employing about 170 people. Did we say that the Philadelphia unit is part of the TREASURY? Yes SIR. Then why, pray, was Untereichsführer Cheney delivering this ten-minute speech, and not the US Treasury Secretary or the Undersecretary of the Treasury? Don’t send us your answers, PLEASE. It is naturally assumed that none of our readers are sitting on their brains.

Having successfully delayed the agreed Settlements for a further two weeks beyond the date when they should have been finalised, the Unterreichsführer doubtless assumed that he could continue, in ongoing collaboration with the Weltkriminalgesellschaft Bushe und Klintenstein GmbH, to block the huge payout Settlements. By definition, the combination of the Settlements (funds brought onto the balance sheet) and the banking reforms mandated by Basel-II, will effectively start to strangle and smother the globalist Dark Forces’ illegitimate financial spigot, thereby making it much harder for these desperate, cornered cadres to achieve their mad global hegemony objectives.

SPECULATING ON THE OIL PRICE: HOW THE ‘BOX GANG’ AIMS TO GET ITS MONEY BACK
As a proviso to this statement, it must be added that the blow to the criminalists’ finances delivered by the prospectively positive outcome of the Wantagate exposures and their global consequences, which the criminalists probably did not fully expect, is now in the process of being made up for by a preplanned criminalist operation to rig and escalate the price of oil. This is being done via massive speculative operations at the big oil firms, which have huge trading floors and are fully liquid.

Colossal illegitimate rental profits, derived from this speculative activity, are being siphoned off into Joint Venture Limited Liability Partnerships holding offshore bank accounts in the names of the usual criminalist suspects and others, along the Enron model (remember?).

THIS is how the Weltkriminalgesellshaft Busche und Klintenstein, GmbH., is ‘getting its own back’.

Please make a mental note of this factor when you read convoluted articles by ‘experts’ trying to work out why the oil price is rising when the dollar is appreciating, as occurred during the week ending on 9th May. This is a carefully orchestrated operation devised by and for the benefit of the ‘Box Gang’ and their associates, who want their lost money back. We will be exposing this latest financial scam, which explains why Goldman Sachs is talking about oil going to $200 a barrel, in a future analysis, for which some additional preparatory analytical work is necessary.

U.S. CONTRACTS WITH THE CHINESE
Back in the real world nearly two years earlier, on or about 21st June 2006, the Chinese authorities entered into a series of contracts with the US Treasury inter alia so as to mobilise $34 trillion held in C.H.I.P.S. (the Clearing House Interbank Payment System accounts used by the Fed to pay the banks) format, for one year and a day.

From this operation to ‘clear the C.H.I.P.S.’, the Chinese authorities stood to earn a profit estimated at $11.0 trillion, for a total due to them of roughly $45 trillion on maturity. However these accounts were fraudulently ‘hollowed out’ by Dr Alan Greenspan, Dr Ben Bernanke, Bush Sr., President Bush Jr. and the Clintons, with the funds and proceeds relocated offshore.

A series of agreements with the Chinese was in fact reached by the former US Treasury Secretary, John Snow and Dr Alan Greenspan, and then later by Dr Ben Bernanke and Henry M. Paulson Jr., in December 2005, and in January, May and June 2006. The May 2006 agreement involved the delivery of the $4.5 trillion ostensibly to finance the Wanta Settlement and ‘The Wanta Plan’, to employ the name coined by the Editor and accepted by the G-7 as ‘fit for purpose’.

The Chinese had also purchased a very large volume of US Treasury securities during the Reagan Administration, the total value of which is believed now to be of the order of $55 trillion. Thus, the Chinese have been owed about $100 trillion by the duplicitous US authorities. Additionally, older US obligations towards the Chinese relating back to the Ming dynasty, remained long outstanding.

When the maturity date for the $34 trillion (probably 21st June 2007) passed without payment, the tensions that had already arisen between Peking and Washington not least due to the retention by Paulson of the $4.5 trillion sent over by the People’s Bank of China in May 2006 ostensibly to fund the Wanta payment, as confirmed in Wanta’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus [see the Wantagate reports dated 24 June and 9 August 2007], which must be accurate or else the petitioner would have been committing perjury, rose several notches.

Back in December 2006, as we reported at the time, Paulson had been arrested in Germany on the basis of a warrant issued by an ad-hoc World Court/ICJ tribunal in response to complaints received concerning his illegal retention/theft of funds. He was exfiltrated from German custody by British contract operatives (Sandline agents) and then flown over to Washington aboard an almost empty British Airways plane, whereupon he was dumped at the Washington Cathedral, just in time to fall asleep at the endless memorial service for the late President Gerald Ford.

For, far from repaying the Chinese in accordance with the several contracts, the American official kleptocracy and their bankster associates continued trading the Chinese funds without China’s authority, using the Chinese $34 trillion as a trading platform, just as they had continued to trade and to leverage the ‘Wanta’ $4.5 trillion, as reported by this service. In short the US crooks wilfully and criminally failed to relinquish control of funds that did not belong to them.

WANTAGATE MASKED AND EXPOSED FAR LARGER PARALLEL FRAUDS
Thus, while we were concentrating upon exposing the scandalous machinations, excuses and foul play exhibited by US Treasury Secretary H. M. Paulson Jr., Vice President R. Cheney and the Bush II White House specifically over the ‘Leo Emil Wanta’ funds, a much bigger, even darker, ongoing criminalist scandal surrounding the exploitation of the Chinese funds was going sour in parallel.

Ironically, our exposures of the sordid shenanigans surrounding the ‘Leo Wanta’ funds served the ‘unintended consequence’ of dislodging, destabilisng and extensively exposing the much bigger financial corruption operations that were taking place at the same time as the hijacking of the ‘Leo Wanta’ funds and the endless US official shiftiness that our Wantagate reports exposed.

On 19th July 2007, a huge replacement LOAN worth an estimated $6.2 trillion was structured and approved within the Bank of England and made available principally by Her Majesty The Queen for delivery to the Bank of New York Mellon, within which $4.5 trillion was now earmarked ostensibly for payment to Wanta and his Commonwealth of Virginia-based AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., or so we were advised at the time [see the Wantagate report dated 30th July 2007]. Since these funds are LOAN funds, they could be withdrawn more or less on demand.

After various vicissitudes, it was established in September 2007 (as we also reported at the time) that the loan funds were held with Citibank; and it subsequently emerged that these ‘Wanta’ funds were/are held in a suspense account at that institution, precisely because the funds were on loan mainly from The Queen, and could/can therefore be withdrawn at any time on demand, if they were not expected to be applied in accordance with the lenders’ specific instructions.

Coincidentally or otherwise, on the anniversary of the Chinese contract (21st June 2007), the Bank of New York Mellon advised the US Treasury that (following its then scheduled merger accord with the US securities broker/dealer Mellon Financial Corporation effective 1st July 2007), it would be able ‘to guarantee the delivery’ of the ‘Wanta’ $4.5 trillion to the corporate securities account of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. within the Citibank Morgan Stanley Securities House bank account.

That assertion was a serious felony under the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934, since no American securities house can guarantee any security or the delivery of funds or securities: only banks can guarantee delivery. Our report dated 30th July 2007 explained how Bank of New York Mellon, which was to act solely as a conduit, effectively diverted/stole the huge LOAN funds, which had been the subject of a bank ‘levy’, thereby further encumbering the balance sheets of the six ‘levy banks’ concerned – Crédit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, UBS, Citibank, Bank of America, and Bank of England.

In the United States, any payment of $1.0 trillion or more is required to be subject to a ‘levy’, to be signed and submitted to the US Treasury, to the Federal Reserve and a financial institution – in this instance, the Bank of New York Mellon, which was guaranteeing the cash and delivery thereof to the institution concerned (Bank of New York Mellon, thus guaranteeing delivery to itself). The $6.2 trillion LOAN proceeds were subjected to a levy via the US law firm of Troutman Sanders LLP. In signing the levy, these institutions placed significant ongoing burdens onto their reserves.

DOUBLE-CROSSING THE EDITOR: ONE ‘SWITCH’ TOO FAR
Following these manoeuvres and our exposures of them on our website, the kleptocracy came under severe pressure, which was exacerbated when the Wanta team turned up at Citigroup, 153 East 53rd Street in Midtown New York on 26th October 2007 and also at the premises of Morgan Stanley, 1585 Broadway and 48th Street on the same day – and then again at Citibank, 399 Park Avenue on 20th November 2007, to demand performance by the institutions on the $4.5 trillion.

When the Wanta party were ordered off the Citibank premises on 20th November 2007, having been clandestinely photographed and accompanied, as they left, by the abrupt appearance at the doors of two armed NYPD policemen, Mr Wanta twice ordered his then colleague Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., to ‘Call Chris’; and the Editor was thus duly informed of this scandalous, farcical escalation in ‘real time’ – notwithstanding that on 3rd November 2007, Mr Wanta had told Mr Cottrell that ‘we have to sever our connections with Christopher Story: but don’t tell him’.

In other words, on the one hand Leo E. Wanta had indicated that he would be dispensing with the Editor’s requisitioned services – we had doubtless become ‘too powerful’ – while on the other hand, Wanta, when in distress some weeks later, ordered Mr Cottrell to ‘Call Chris’ TWICE, so that the details of his predicament vis-à-vis Citibank could be posted immediately on our website in order for the whole world to be informed about what was going on.

Unfortunately, Mr Wanta cannot have it both ways. The Editor’s services were not his property, to use, exploit and discard in accordance with his latest whims and requirements. And so, as it duly turned out, this behaviour represented just one double-cross too many.

At all events, the Editor had no reason to know at the time that his requisitioned publicity platform and services were no longer required at all; and indeed he did not become aware that he had been double-crossed, until 17th March 2008 (see below): we therefore continued the Wantagate reports as though nothing had changed. The Editor’s $35,000, provided from scarce private resources in good faith to bail Leo Wanta out of his unlawful probation in Wisconsin, has not been repaid and is therefore now categorised as having been stolen.

On 18th March, the Editor posted the final Wantagate report, indicating to Mr Wanta and anyone else who cared to take note, that so far as Michael C. Cottrell. M.S., and the Editor of this service were concerned, neither would be able to be associated at all, in any way with any activities which may be conducted beyond the Rule of Law, if that was the intention. We thought we made this clear.

The Editor’s suspicions having been aroused, though, he now became aware, as mentioned, that – in conformity with the standard filthy US criminal intelligence community routine – he had indeed been deceived and double-crossed.

This became clear after he had requested, on the 14th March 2008, a written statement from Leo Emil Wanta confirming that all transactions to be undertaken under the Wanta Plan and otherwise, would conform at all times 100% with the Rule of Law, which had been so conspicuously and boldly promulgated via our Wantagate reports, with Leo Wanta’s enthusiastic ongoing support. This was rejected out of hand by one of Mr Wanta’s other colleagues on his behalf, three hours later.

After all, both on our website and in International Currency Review, we had repeatedly displayed a list of the US Statutes and securities regulations of which named parties and institutions were and remain in breach, together with authoritative US legal statements of the position with regard to the torts of Fraud in the Inducement, Fraud by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft, Fraudulent Deceit, and Theft by Deception, Fraudulent Conveyance and Fraudulent Concealment.

How, then, could either Mr Cottrell or the Editor of this service go along with any practice other than 100% adherence to the US Rule of Law, or even with the slightest suspicion that it might be intended not to adhere to it? Besides, in communications to the President of the United States – for instance, in his letter dated 31st August 2007 – Mr Leo Wanta himself had specifically appealed for President Bush to adhere to the Rule of Law:

‘If US President George W Bush, Jr. is operating under the “Rule of Law” which is absolutely shattered “by others”…’.

Evidently the Rule of Law mattered then, but no longer mattered now.

MICHAEL C. COTTRELL SEVERS RELATIONS WITH WANTA
Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., was appointed Secretary/Treasurer of Wanta’s AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc, at a Board meeting held in Richmond, VA, on 28th December 2004. Then, on the 16th December 2005, he was appointed to be Executive Vice President and Treasurer of the corporation, and various joint ventures with Mr Cottrell’s own company, Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., were authorised.

On the 14th August 2006, Michael Cottrell was able, thanks to his securities market credentials, good standing and reputation, to obtain a corporate securities account for Wanta’s AmeriTrust Groupe Inc., into which the $4.5 trillion Wanta ‘compromise’ settlement funds were to be paid.

Mr Cottrell insisted throughout that a corporate securities account would be mandatory, so far as he was concerned, for fundamental reasons alluded to in earlier reports on this website.

For instance, under the 1933 and 1934 Securities Acts, the assets of clients of US broker-dealers are not included within the assets of the institution, so that they cannot be sequestrated – contrary to the position with US banks. Mr Cottrell advised that given that all Leo E. Wanta’s bank accounts appeared to have been raided and ransacked, he, of all people, ought to be aware that US banks cannot be trusted and that ‘his’ funds would be permanently at risk in any bank account.

This advice was rejected outright by Wanta, thereby removing any point in Mr Wanta employing the services of a financial adviser and securities expert, let alone an expert of the calibre of Michael C. Cottrell, M.S.. If Wanta was not prepared to listen to this expert, and to pay proper attention to his conscientious advice, how could he (Mr Cottrell) perform his duties?

For this and other reasons, such as Wanta’s generally indisciplined approach to transactions, Mr Cottrell finally indicated, in the first quarter of 2008, that he would not be able to participate at all with Wanta in the pre-planned joint venture and other transactions unless (a) the transactions were to be conducted, as arranged and previously agreed, via the corporate securities account which had been made available due to Mr Cottrell’s own credentials; and (b) an Oversight Panel was to be appointed with a brief to supervise all such transactions.

The most obvious reason for this second demand was that should any decisions be made by Wanta arbitrarily, and transactions undertaken, contrary to Michael C. Cottrell’s professional advice and in defiance of the regulations and the Rule of Law, it would not just be Mr Wanta that would be liable, but Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., would be liable, as Executive Vice President/Treasurer, as well.

We hinted at this situation in our Wantagate report dated 3rd March 2008, which was specifically designed to warn Wanta of the consequences of any deviation from the Rule of Law. To no avail.

When all his necessary professional advice ‘went nowhere’, Mr Cottrell prepared to separate from Wanta. On 23rd March 2008, though, Leo Wanta jumped the gun by issuing a three-page document headed ‘Minutes of Special Meeting of the Sole Shareholder of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.’, implying that Wanta had held a meeting with himself. He faxed this irregular document to Michael Cottrell.

Elementary business practice requires the DIRECTORS, not the shareholder(s), to convene and hold Board Meetings, which issue Resolutions. This document, which was distributed ‘to others’ and is in any case in the public domain in Richmond, VA (see below), contained this paragraph:

‘BE IT RESOLVED, that the undersigned hereby directs that the Officers and the Directors of the Corporation take all such official actions as may be required to notify all outside parties including banks, financial houses, securities dealers, government agencies, government officials (foreign and domestic) that MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, M.S., has no right, authority and/or fiduciary capacity to conduct any form of business either in law and/or equity on behalf of the Corporation [AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.] and/or on behalf of any other Officer, Director and/or Shareholder of the Corporation’.

As the formally appointed Executive Vice President and Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. [see above] Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., who had now been dismissed by Wanta by means of an irregular document, proceeded, as instructed, to regularise the situation by fulfilling his responsibilities to the letter and promptly filing notification of his ‘resignation’ with the relevant Commonwealth of Virginia authorities in Richmond, using the forms that they provide for such purposes – enclosing the various pertinent documents including the irregular ‘dismissal’ document issued by Leo Wanta, and directing the Commonwealth of Virginia State authorities to forward all documentation and taxation demands to Wanta’s address in Wisconsin.

As noted, all this filing and related documentation sits in the public domain in Richmond. It will of course be recalled that Wanta represented that he was not running a business out of the State of Wisconsin [see Wantagate report dated 6th August 2007, all of which remains accurate and is in no way nullified by this latest sequence of events].

For the record also, Wanta issued a document dated 26th February 2006 labelled TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, which is likewise in the public domain, which reads inter alia as follows:

Settlement Offers, e.g. December 12, 2006, et al: ‘This letter authorizes Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., the President of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., as of this date, to conclude the details and disposition of said settlement funds for deposit via Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. Account(s) on behalf of Leo E. Wanta/Lee E. Wanta with the United States Social Security Number’ [redacted].

This document was signed by Wanta and appropriately witnessed.

Separately, Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., is believed to have prepared due diligence documentation running to several hundreds of pages containing inter alia papers signed by Leo/Lee Wanta giving details of agreed financial operations and pay orders worth very large aggregate sums of money, to be made available as required to demonstrate the damage that Mr Cottrell and his own corporation have suffered. It is understood that the evidence that is contained in this due diligence portfolio will be likely to have profound and painful repercussions.

‘Fraud by Inducement‘ springs immediately to mind in this context. Entering into huge financial undertakings without the finances to fund them, may represent Fraud by Inducement. As for this Editor’s paltry $35,000, as separately mentioned, it is nearly one year overdue and is currently considered to have been stolen. Stealing money is still a felony, even in the United States.

All of the above will explain, to anyone who may have been puzzled, why we posted the Wantagate article dated 18th March 2008, which represented the FINAL attempt by Mr Cottrell, supported by the Editor of this service, to try to make it clear to Wanta and relevant parties that adherence to the US Rule of Law with no deviation therefrom at any time now or in the future, would remain the only criterion that would determine whether or not Mr Cottrell could be a party to any transactions to be conducted by and with Wanta generally, and specifically in the format of the The Wanta Plan.

NOVEMBER 2007: THE KLEPTOCRACY COMES UNDER REAL PRESSURE
Reverting now to events which preceded the severance outlined above: the aforementioned visits by the Wanta team, as then constituted, to the two institutions that were involved in playing games with the $4.5 trillion, sent a powerful tsunami of belated alarm throughout those key elements of the international financial community then ‘in the know’, since we understand that neither Citibank nor Morgan Stanley thought that the Wanta people would ever turn up at those institutions.

It is further understood that the three Wanta team visits caused consternation and trepidation in the Boardrooms of both institutions, and throughout Wall Street generally.

The main problem facing the very large financial institutions is that they have been involved in tax evasion on a monumental scale, inter alia by using exempted accounts held with the International Monetary Fund to channel and handle undeclared, ongoing untaxed exotic financial refunding and discounting transactions ‘below the radar’, which is one of several sound reasons why the blunt description ‘criminal enterprise’ as applied to these enterprises in general cannot be disputed.

OVERSIGHT PROPOSAL IMMEDIATELY ACCEPTED AS MANDATORY
It may be recalled that it was in our closing Wantagate Report (18th March 2008), that Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. first made it clear, in public, that he would not now be participating in any pre-agreed financial transactions with Leo E. Wanta without the reassurance and backstop to be provided by an Oversight Panel, in order to ensure that all Wanta transactions complied 100% with the Rule of Law at all times – which would presuppose that any off-balance sheet, undercover, secret, untaxed and otherwise irregular transactions, would be precluded and that he, Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., could not accordingly be implicated in any such irregular transactions.

The Editor supported this stance with his own commendation, stating that, given our common human nature and the temptations to which we are all subject, no-one could object to such a requirement. Further details, with documents, are published in International Currency Review.

In light of the instances of the ongoing financial criminality exposed inter alia via the Wantagate reports, the Group of Seven (G-7) financial powers have finally demanded, as pointed out in our report dated 12th April 2008, that the scandalous hijacking of the global financial economy by the reckless Bush-Clinton ‘shadow government’ grabitisation network (a.k.a. Weltkriminalgesellschaft Bushe und Klintenstein, GmbH) will no longer be tolerated – pointedly endorsing, in a reprimand to the White House and to the criminal elements resident inside the US Treasury and the biggest Wall Street institutions, the report of the Financial Stability Forum (FSF) publicised during the Spring Meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank (1), which now demanded much stricter discipline and safeguards against embedded criminality throughout the financial system.

Specifically, the Group of Seven (G-7) Ministers and Governors stated that ‘we… strongly endorse the report and commit to implementing its recommendations. Rapid implementation of the Financial Stability Forum report will not only enhance the resilience of the global financial system for the longer term, but should help to support confidence and improve the functioning of the markets’.

The G-7 statement claimed that the report presented a specific and substantive set of practical reform recommendations, identifying four rigorous proposals which MUST be implemented over the 100 days (2) following the international agreement to release (reached on Sunday, 13th April) to be augmented by five further requirements, including the following:

• ‘Strengthening the authorities’ responsiveness to risk: Supervisors and central banks should further strengthen cooperation and exchange of information, including the assessment of financial stability risks. It is important that an “international college of supervisors” be established for EACH OF THE LARGEST GLOBAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS’.

• ‘Market authorities should also act cooperatively and swiftly TO INVESTIGATE AND PENALIZE FRAUD, MARKET ABUSE, AND MANIPULATION’.

• What this meant was that each of the big financial institutions is to be supervised by a separate international supervisory and monitoring ‘college’, so as to enforce discipline and rectitude within this free-wheeling, headstrong and aberrant segment of the international financial community.

Logically, therefore, ANY organisation controlling very large sums of money would be considered a financial institution requiring to be permanently subjected to the discipline and transparency to be demanded by its own ‘international college of supervisors’. That should include Wanta’s entity.

In other words, Mr Michael C. Cottrell’s stated REQUIREMENT for an Oversight Panel to monitor the financial operations in which he was to be involved, has been ADOPTED ACROSS THE BOARD and is now an IRREVOCABLE NECESSITY, as a specific, predictable and unavoidable consequence of the wayward, arrogant, swashbuckling financial fraud, endless lies and duplicity, the open-ended theft and institutionalised criminality spotlighted inter alia by the Wantagate reports.

This reprobate behaviour continues to this day, not only because these criminal leopards cannot change their spots, but also as the thieves try vainly to disguise their abject defeat by maximising the potential for obfuscating it with evil and crass diversionary ploys of every description.

OPPOSITION TO OVERSIGHT EXPOSES THE OBJECTOR
Manifestly, any antagonism towards, and open opposition to, this logical response to decades of fraudulent, untaxed finance and tax evasion, exposes objectors as being unwilling to submit to the Rule of Law and to the disciplines at long last demanded by the international community, now that this open-ended financial criminality has been exposed.

Hence, there can be no turning back on this score, so that anyone resisting this measure will, by definition, automatically attract the attention of national supervisors and law enforcement, whether connected with the criminalised intelligence community or not, as being prospectively liable in the future to flout the Rule of Law, so that such persons could never be trusted to handle large sums of money in a transparent manner. And given what has been exposed, nor should they be.

Interestingly, minimal attention was directed towards this matter during the weeks immediately following the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings, which is why we stress its importance here.

As we pointed out, with emphasis, in our report on 12th April:

• THE FSF’S DEMAND FOR EACH LARGE INSTITUTION TO BE ENCUMBERED WITH ITS OWN SEPARATE ‘COLLEGE’ WHICH WILL MONITOR ITS OPERATIONS IS A CLEAR, AND DECISIVE, INDICATION THAT THE G-7 HAS FINALLY ACCEPTED THE ACCURACY OF OUR EXPOSURES
OF OPEN-ENDED FINANCIAL CORRUPTION AT THE BIG BANKS.

• THIS WOULD EXPLAIN WHY OUR DESIGNATION OF CERTAIN HUGE INSTITUTIONS AS CRIMINAL ENTERPRISES HASN’T BEEN CHALLENGED. BECAUSE IT’S ACCURATE.

• THE GROUP OF SEVEN AGREES WITH US.

• IT CAN BE FURTHER ELABORATED THAT THE G-7’S RELATED POINTED REFERENCE TO FRAUD AND MANIPULATION IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT MAKES IT CLEAR THAT WE ARE ON THE SAME PAGE AS THE G-7 (OR RATHER, VICE VERSA).

• THE G-7 HAS FINALLY, AT LONG LAST, WOKEN UP TO THE OBVIOUS REALITY, WHICH HAS BEEN SCANDALOUSLY IGNORED BY THE COMPLACENT ACADEMIC COMMUNITY ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ATLANTIC, THAT THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CRISIS IS ALL ABOUT THE FRAUDULENT FINANCE PERPETRATED WITH IMPUNITY AT THE WORLD’S BIGGEST BANKS.

THE WANTAGATE EXPOSURES AND THE CREDIT CRUNCH
Meanwhile, as the impact inter alia of the Wantagate reports about these scandals reverberated around the official world, the true proportions of US official and banking sector fraudulent finance and scamming sank in, triggering the generalised crisis of confidence that erupted in July 2007 – focused on securitised investment vehicles (SIVs) which were now suspected of incorporating fake mortgage documentation (euphemistically referred to as ‘sub-prime ‘mortgages, but which actually represented, in part, ‘virtual assets’ backed by nothing at all).

It was now realised that the Americans had been flogging dud paper all over the world, that these scams were orchestrated or aided and abetted by US official and intelligence cadres, and that it was by no means an exaggeration to refer, as this service has done, to certain huge American banks as criminal enterprises. This stricture is known to have caused ‘angst’ on Wall Street.

The upshot was that, as we reported, at least 4,500 US bankers were rounded up and flown to European centres last year, where they were subjected to interrogation. The actual number of bankers rounded up in September-November 2007 may have reached 6,000. It will be recalled that we reported that nine aircraft were ‘requisitioned’ for the purposes of conveying the handcuffed bankers to the European interrogation centres, and that, in many instances, wives and partners were given no opportunity to say goodbye or even to telephone their families.

As a consequence of these interrogations, the gravely affronted international community obtained watertight specifics and evidence about the massive proportions of the ongoing financial thefts and fraudulent finance, leveraging, exploitation and other abuses of stolen funds, including the $34 trillion belonging to the Chinese parties, the $6.2 trillion of loan funds made available by HM The Queen, and of course the original $4.5 trillion provided in 2006 by the People’s Bank of China in apparent response to the ‘surfacing’ of Leo Emil Wanta, when he ‘ceased to be dead’ contrary to the CIA’s promulgated lie to that effect, after the Editor of this service provided the sum of $35,000 with which ‘Restitution’ was paid to the Wisconsin Department of Corrections for remittance to the corrupt Wisconsin State Department of Revenue [see report dated 6th August 2007].

It should be added here that the Editor has received NO RESPONSE from Judge James Martin, of Wisconsin, to whom he wrote last October under the ‘Misprision of Felony’ Statute, pointing out the scandalous triplication of tax-collection and other fabrications by the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue. It was incumbent upon the Editor to draw his attention to these abominations.

AGGRIEVED FOREIGN PARTIES POOL INFORMATION AND RESOURCES
It is believed that in the course of November last year, the Chinese authorities, MI6 (on behalf of Her Majesty), the Swiss authorities, the Group of Seven, perhaps the representatives of the 160 payee countries and other aggrieved parties pooled their resources in the face of these endless US outrages, so that thereafter the pressure exerted by the international community proved to be relentless, and far more effective than had been the case earlier.

There was confirmed talk of an international economic embargo being imposed upon the United States, as we reported; and tensions became more evident inside the Beltway, beginning with that incident when a blaze broke out at the Old Executive Office Building on 19th December 2007, as cover for the seizure of yet more damning evidence of official corruption from Cheney files by US Special Forces operatives.

‘PAULSON EVENTS’ DID NOT DISCREDIT THE WANTA FILES
The shootings that occurred on 28th/29th December 2007, can now be understood in the broader context of aggrieved parties, domestic and external, taking matters into their own hands. A high-level decision was subsequently made to maintain the fiction that Paulson remained both alive and US Treasury Secretary, despite massive evidence to the contrary, culminating in intelligence from several sources that Treasury officials have been referring to the ‘Paulson’ as ‘the double’.

None of the intelligence on this subject that we published on 2nd and 9th January 2008 has ever been officially denied, while the information was very specifically reconfirmed inter alia by a former Governor of the Federal Reserve Board, a US Ambassador (both of whose identities are known to us but have been suppressed by us on request), and by the US State Department itself.

That Department is known to lie frequently; and if it did so on this occasion, it will bear its own responsibility and iniquity. Attempts to discredit the Wanta files could never have succeeded anyway, as a substantial proportion of them have long since been published in facsimile format in International Currency Review, and are thus resident in files, libraries and safe locations all over the world. Wantagate and its consequences cannot be stuffed back into the genie’s bottle.

A Japanese visitor to the Editor’s London office in late March informed us that the ‘Paulson’ who appeared at the Group of Eight meeting held in Tokyo on 10th February 2008, was replaced by a second ‘Paulson’ half way through the conference, implying that there are multiple Mr P. ‘doubles’. Nothing has ever been heard from the family about this affair.

Paulson had alienated vast funds inter alia to Bank Leumi.

That such violence erupted – after an earlier gun battle in the Vice President’s premises in June 2007 had been hushed up, like the attempt by US Special Forces to ‘take out’ Herr Cheney while his plane was parked on the runway at Sydney Airport, Australia, during the spring of 2007 – can today be more easily comprehended given the unprecedented magnitude of the exposed financial scams being committed on a gargantuan scale by the organised criminal mafiosi occupying the highest offices in the United States. The timing of the attack to ‘take out’ Cheney in Australia related, we suspect, to the stealing of The Queen’s gold on 29th-30th March 2007 – another colossal criminal operation layered on top of those already cited, and which was only rectified around July 2007 (we believe) after insistent pressure from The Queen, and our reports suggesting that the American Ambassador should be kicked out of London. Where possible, these ‘things’ are done abroad.

WAS RAFIDAIN BANK A FACTOR BEHIND THE THEFT OF THE QUEEN’S GOLD?
The Editor speculates that a US official criminalist ‘rationalisation’ for the stealing of The Queen’s gold may have been a possible refusal by the British authorities to allow any US access to the $100 trillion or so of estimated fiat assets accumulated by Mr Saddam Hussein and his late sons in Bank Rafidain (see below), which were believed to have been retained in sub-accounts of the London branch of that institution. This in turn means that these ‘Saddam Hussein’ assets appear to have been annexed by the British authorities and banks, not least to buttress the financial positions of banks in the City of London. All international strife and tensions are about MONEY, not resources.

BROWN SHOULD HAVE LECTURED THE WHITE HOUSE ON HOW TO BEHAVE
Notwithstanding the general outrage surrounding the theft of The Queen’s gold, Gordon Brown, the British Prime Minister – whose 55 minute audience of The Queen on 27th June 2007, when he attended at Buckingham Palace to be appointed Prime Minister, is believed to have focused on Her Majesty’s extreme concern about the stealing by US criminal operatives of her gold – failed to take the opportunity to give the American Administration a piece of his mind, when he delivered a knee-jerk globalist speech at the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum in Boston on 18th April 2008. Sophisticates would argue that you don’t abuse a formal platform provided by a foreign government as an honour, by criticising the host authorities. This would be fine if the authorities in question had not criminally attempted to impoverish an allied Head of State.

This was an occasion when Brown could have ttorn the Bush II White House to shreds in public, speaking the only language that these veteran mega-criminals can understand. In doing so, Brown would have greatly enhanced his faltering domestic support: standing up to this odious American Government would be worth a huge number of British votes. Admittedly Gordon Brown did allude to tensions between Britain and the United States in oblique terms – observing that ‘we urgently need to step out of the mindset of competing interests and instead find our common interests – and we must summon up the best instincts and efforts of humanity in a cooperative effort to build new international rules and institutions for the new global era’ (code for ‘your selfishness sucks’).

But one cannot appeal to the ‘best instincts of criminals’, because they don’t have any: so that was absurd. Then Mr Brown revealed, loud and clear, that he is an international socialist, which he has never, as far as we know, done in public before: ‘That is how we must respond, not walking away as we did in Rwanda at the cost of many thousands of lives, but by becoming engaged as hard-headed internationalists’. Unfortunately, this British Prime Minister’s ‘hard-headed internationalism’ does not seem to extend to Zimbabwe, where the abominations perpetrated by Mr Mugabe’s Illuminati-sponsored ‘Black’ dictatorship are reported to be on the verge or morphing into genocide.

When such ‘hard-headed internationalists’ use typically clichéd ideological rhetoric, what they are actually driving at is that national boundaries, national sovereignty and nation states generally are expendable, in the interests of prompting and realising the ‘new global era’ – Brown’s euphemism for The New Underworld Order. The Prime Minister is a master of the dull, repetitious cliché, and his mind appears to be choked with all the false diversionary globalist issues, viz. ‘climate change’.

This internationalist bogey, by the way, has recently changed its name from ‘global warming’ because the scientific evidence that human activity is responsible for it has been shown to be spurious and riddled with holes. For instance, in the 1950s, numerous mammalian fossils were unearthed during foundation works in Trafalgar Square, Pall Mall, Lower Regent Street, and also Cockspur Street, in Central London – the remains of hippopotami, lions, hyaenas, straight-tusked elephants, aurochs, and bison, which patrolled the area approximately 125,000 years ago (3).

Finally, after trotting out the usual empty and duplicitous verbiage about ‘America leading the world in the fight against terrorism’ – when, as a British intelligence officer, Brown must surely be aware that the United States deliberately promotes international terrorism as an instrument of state and internationalist policy – Brown concluded with an invocation of the ‘special relationship’.

But this was destroyed when US Government’s criminalist cadres stole The Queen’s gold, and has been further undermined by the recalcitrant behaviour of the Bush-Clinton Weltkriminalgesellshaft régime over its retention of financial assets that do not belong to the United States contrary to the exasperated will of the international community. Talk of a ‘special relationship’ against this very well-known background is both dishonest and meaningless: and only the probably ignorant and sycophantic audience at the John F Kennedy Presidential Library could have been impressed.

BROWN PINNING HOPES ON A SHARP ECONOMIC RECOVERY
Following the severe drubbing that Brown’s Labour Government received from the disaffected electorate in local government and London elections on 1st May, press analysis of the expected outcome contained few indications that the UK ‘mainstream’ media had much of a clue about the unprecedented scale of the global refinancing operation that was taking place behind the scenes – with the exception of the following closing remarks that appeared on the front page of The Daily Telegraph, London, on 2nd May 2008:

‘Key to the Labour recovery is an optimistic view of the UK economy. The Bank of England on Wednesday said that the worst of the global credit crunch could be over and Mr Brown is betting on a significant upturn’ (4).

The observations revealed, of course, that, as a senior UK intelligence officer, Brown knew that the refinancing releases, involving the placement of some $300 trillion onto the books – a process that was necessarily taking time to complete – was well under way, and could indeed reach the anticipated satisfactory (for some) conclusion.

This ‘optimistic’ view of future economic and financial prospects was supported (on 6th May) by Sir Win Bischoff, the leading UK banker who was ‘parachuted in’ to Citibank, New York, last autumn, almost certainly to ensure that The Queen’s loan funds held within that institution (in a suspense account) were properly safeguarded. It was further supported on the 7th May by George Soros (on Bloomberg) and again by several German bankers (Forbes). These hints reflect the reality that well-placed bankers know that the Settlements are proceeding, and that repeated ongoing attempts by the Weltkriminalgesellschaft to block them, will not be allowed to succeed.

A further oblique indication that ‘matters are proceeding’ behind a deliberately contrived veil of obfuscation (consisting of contrived ‘virtual’ tensions, an information blackout about the releases, an attempt to ignite a virtual-cum-real diversionary conflagration in the Middle East, the ‘economic stimulus checks’ and much confused reporting by the Fifth Estate), concerns the outlook for the two huge 60,000-tonne aircraft carriers for The Queen/Royal Navy, estimated to cost $4.0 billion each. The Editor is in a position to know that this project, which the Ministry of Defence has ring-fenced, is to be financed out of ‘settlement money’. Hitherto, Parliament has been aggravated by the fact that the Ministry of Defence has prevaricated and refused to provide it with information as to when the contracts for these huge carriers will be announced. Various references to this matter have appeared recently in the British Press. On 9th May, the London media reported that defence sources had stated that the Ministry of Defence is to agree a contract for the ships within the next few weeks. The Ministry of Defence cannot ‘agree a contract’ unless it has the funds with which to finance it, otherwise it will be engaged in Fraud by Inducement.

Since the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings, and especially during the first week of May, six weeks after innumerable secret bank accounts holding stolen and unreported, untaxed funds had been ripped open, truly massive amounts of offshore monies (amounting to the estimated $300 trillion) had been repatriated to the United States for placing onto the books in conformity with the Basel-II requirements applicable to the ‘new’ banking régime.

As was previously reported on this website (17th April), the United States was dragged kicking and screaming like a spoilt child into the new Basel-II compliance banking environment with effect from one minute past midnight on Monday 14th April 2008.

That was a decisive development, given the US Government’s endless and crude resistance.

THE U.S. KAKOCRACY’S DESPERATE STRUGGLE FOR ‘IMMUNITY’
Faced with the imminent total exposure of their serial giga-criminality, the worst perpetrators of these crimes – the Bushes, Dr Alan Greenspan, the Clintons, Mr Cheney et al – had been exerting maximum pressure through their lawyers to obtain immunity from prosecution, trying their luck with the US Supreme Court as well as the World Court/ICJ.

By the third week of April, we had established that the World Court had REFUSED any immunity for Greenspan and former President W. Clinton (which means, incidentally, that the Clintons’ second (Irish) passports won’t be of use should either try to flee the United States, as Ireland subscribes to the jurisdictions of the World Court/ICJ).

We also understand that none of the US criminalist perpetrators are likely to ‘escape’ the wrath to come, and which is descending upon them ‘as we speak’. It is more than likely that, quite apart from other sanctions, China, having been finally repaid, will take measures to ensure that the retribution demanded by their culture is satisfied, according to several sober experts we have consulted.

Significantly, senior people were reported to us to have left the White House on Monday 21st April (information provided by an informed source at 6.30pm on that date), these departures having NOT been announced – implying that the rush for the exit had accelerated with a turn of events that had placed the international community decisively in the driving seat pending resolution of the crisis.

After all, since most of the key people even at the Treasury were expected to be arrested, hanging around in the doomed Bush II White House was no longer, for understandably alarmed operatives, a sensible option. Whether these people have fled the country is not yet known. It was further the case that George Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. were both informed that the absolute end of the road had been reached – and that if the releases were frustrated in any way, both would be arrested without any further ado. The CURRENT state of affairs is that the Settlements should have been completed over 3 weeks ago, and APPEARED to have been frustrated. However our best ‘special’ intelligence sources insist that this is not the case. The apparent information blackout is said to be contrived. [The US Solicitor General, Paul Clement, resigned on 14th May]

It was widely rumoured on Sunday 20th April that the Vatican, the Knights of Malta and the Knights Templar had been ‘paid’ – prompting appropriately cynical observations about a certain category of Illuminati recipient ‘naturally’ being paid first. Then again, on 2nd May, it was being said by different sources that the Mormons and the Knights of Malta were being funded before anyone else. These rumours were, surprisingly, reconfirmed to us on 15th May. We connot confirm the reconfirmations: we therefore report them ‘raw’, for the record.

Specifically, it was suggested earlier that the Vatican had been repaid $2.0 trillion (it’s always $2.0 trillion, isn’t it) which had been scammed from the Vatican Bank by George Bush Sr., who bled the bank dry after he was kicked out of Spain by Banco de España following our exposures in 2006.

Bush had pleaded with the Vatican to accept his funds, but as usual he had then orchestrated the ransacking of the receiving bank (by some means or other of which we are unaware).

The Vatican was said to have been repaid from the Marshall Act account, a CIA account which Bush Sr. had been using as his own private trading platform. Langley, after all, has been renamed ‘The George Bush Center for Intelligence’.

Separately, during the preceding week, the Knights of Malta evidently complained that they did not fancy being paid in US Treasuries, and after three days of negotiations they managed to procure an agreement that they should be paid in cash.

This may have been the origin of suggestions, which we reported on 17th April, that payments would be made in the form of Treasury securities, which, despite the fact that the United States is/has been completely bust and that the US Treasury cannot be trusted, are ironically the best assets obtainable, given that gold is subject to manipulation and its price is normally rigged.

UNUSUAL DEVELOPMENTS, AND DEATHS, BEHIND THE SCENES
On Monday 21st April, an attempt was made to arrest Vice President Richard B. Himmler (Cheney), which was thwarted when US Marshals tipped him off. It was later understood that these Marshals had been ‘handled’ by MI6 officers, who have been crawling around in the United States, along with Chinese and other World Court/ICJ agents, to procure an end already to the endless duplicity of the US kleptocracy-mafiosi and to assure final completion of the delayed releases.

All of which will have left the relevant US Congressional Committees, and numerous legislators, feeling most uncomfortable – not least since investigations conducted in Europe in the spring of 2007, as we reported at the time, turned up detailed information about offshore bank accounts held by over 1,500 individuals on Capitol Hill. It is unclear whether information concerning an estimated 200 bank accounts established in the past in Canada (allegedly with Royal Bank of Canada), which were at one time being ‘hidden’ by the since imprisoned ONI operative Mark Delmart Vreeland, had been thrown into the World Court/ICJ ‘mix’: but in the prevailing tense climate, these exposures can hardly have left anyone on Capitol Hill confident of not having his or her front door broken down in the middle of the night by Navy Seals (see below).

Many weeks earlier, intelligence was leaked about the untimely death of Austie Patricia McCracken, described as a former ‘CIA Project Director’. The Washington Post reported on the 8th March 2008, that ‘Ms Austie Patricia McCracken, 62, former Project Director for the CIA’s Counterintelligence Center, died [on] February 14th at her home in The Woodlands, Texas’. This ‘just happens’ to be where former President George H. W. Bush lives*. And McCracken ‘just happened’ to have been a key keeper of the funds (allegedly inter alia of the ‘Leo Wanta funds’) who could accordingly be assumed to have ‘known too much’. The newspaper report elaborated that ‘the cause of death is under investigation by the Montgomery County, Texas, Justice of the Peace Office’.

The report then broke with the norm and provided details which are NEVER divulged – from which the Editor deduces that the CIA, or elements of it, were/are extremely uptight about this sudden death. According to The Washington Post, ‘Ms McCracken joined the Central Intelligence Agency in 1967 and worked there for 23 years in field positions overseas as well as in the United States. She rose to personnel-evaluation management officer, to directorate equal employment opportunity officer, and to branch and deputy branch chief before becoming the Counterintelligence Center’s Project Director in 1989’.

‘When she retired in 1991, she received a Career Intelligence Medal and Citation, which noted that she was ‘known as a problem solver who possessed a phenomenal memory, very keen insight and excellent judgment’.

‘She was born in Hempstead, NY, and graduated from East Texas State University in Commerce, TX. After her retirement from the CIA, she moved to Orlando. She moved to Texas in November 2007. Her marriage to Paul Dale Roche ended in divorce. Survivors include two brothers’.

We are advised by an impeccable source ‘in the know’ that such details, as indicated, are NEVER divulged for public consumption. It can be speculated that she may have been enticed in some way to The Woodlands area of Houston by George Bush Sr., who may have needed to know what she knew about the accounts. The fact that The Washington Post only published this potted biography of this CIA woman on 8th March, when she died on 14th February, was also extremely suspicious.

Just three days later, in the early morning of 17th February 2008, according to ‘insider’ reports, a United Nations employee, Ms Maria DiBiase, plunged to her death from the 19th floor of the UN Headquarters building in New York City. The 19th floor houses the Department of Peace-Keeping Operations/Field Administration and Logistics Division (DPKO/FALD), as well as the code machines used for the encrypted fax equipment employed for DPKO operations, plus a spare range of code machines used for DPKO rapid response functions. The dead woman, from Austria, was reportedly a computer specialist for the United Nations, and a former Conference Services staff member with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna.

An Associated Press report dated Tuesday 19th February stated that police and UN security officers at the scene, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to talk to the media, said that the woman, in her 40s, had jumped from a window after turning up to work early in the morning of the previous Sunday. UN deputy spokeswoman, Marie Okabe, said that ‘a UN agency staff member died after falling from the 19th floor of the UN Secretariat Building. At this time there is no suspicion of foul play’. Ms Marie Okabe added that UN officials would not confirm the woman’s identity even after her next of kin had been notified. So details of the woman’s identity was left to a ‘licensed’ US website information source, which elaborated that:

‘The UN Special Commission (UNSCOM) maintained in a special United Nations computer database all the files on Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction program [that were] retrieved from the compact disks provided to UNSCOM by Saddam’s Government prior to the US invasion of Iraq. The database is reported to include all the black market nuclear suppliers involved in providing materials to Iraq, Iran, Pakistan and Libya via Turkey and the A Q Khan smuggling network. The list reportedly includes front companies in Switzerland linked to Marc Rich, the American fugitive pardoned by President Clinton, and Dick Cheney’.

The intelligence source was told that there may have been a ‘black bag’ operation taking place on the 19th floor at the same time that DiBiase arrived for work, to finish a project that was due on the following Monday morning, 18th February. The UNSCOM files reportedly validate many of former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds’ claims about nuclear smuggling that had been published earlier in The Sunday Times, London.

Marc Rich is a long-range Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD) operative named Hans Brand, who emigrated to Canada in 1954, staying initially in Saskatoon.

He has established a bank in Zug, Switzerland.

There was no mention in any of these and related reports of the two Soviet ships that left the Iraqi port of Umm Qasr about three weeks ahead of the US-led invasion, and then vanished.

These ships carried the physical evidence of weapons of mass destruction, in accordance with the standard Soviet-era policy of removing most traces of such weapons activity whenever the risk of Western retaliation was judged to have become excessive. In Romania, this standard official policy was codenamed ‘Operation Sarindar’, according to a Romanian defector – information that was first published in the US press in September 2003.

The Editor obtained outline details of how all traces of Mr Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction were extracted from Iraq ahead of the invasion in March 2003, inter alia from British and Russian (GRU) sources. This intelligence must have been known in London and Washington. Furthermore, it was reported in our Arab-Asian Affairs and Soviet Analyst intelligence services, which circulate among foreign governments and their intelligence communities.

TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF TOP-LEVEL ‘IMMUNITIES’ ALLOWED
On Tuesday 22nd April 2008, one week after the Settlements should have been finalised, it became known that the European parties and the Chinese had ‘allowed’ an extension of the ‘immunities’ for the key criminalists until 5.00pm on Friday 25th April – which date and time was then confirmed at the time by all our sources to represent the absolute deadline beyond which no further delay in effecting the Settlements would be tolerated. There is no way of telling whether this information represented a smokescreen of lies or not.

Also on the 22nd, an elderly Trustee aged 80, who had been working conscientiously on these matters for 20 years and had been repeatedly called into the relevant bank at all hours of the day and night at short notice in expectation of completions and releases, suddenly collapsed and was rushed to hospital. We were authoritatively advised that the Trustee had been in excellent health and that an attempt had been made on his life – a fact which evidently caused absolute fury behind the scenes. Indeed we were informed that ‘no resources will be spared’ to identity and ‘deal with’ whoever gave the order for this attempted liquidation of this conscientious octogenarian, and that ‘no mercy’ would be spared in this connection.

The ‘extension’ to the high-level US ‘immunities’ was granted, we were led to believe, because multiple verification procedures had been insisted upon by the Group of Seven (G-7), the World Court/ICJ, the Chinese authorities, the 160 governments whose representatives had been waiting impatiently as we had reported, since October 2007, and MI6 acting for HM The Queen. Of these powerful international forces arrayed against the duplicitous official criminalist mafiosi, the most formidable, apart from The Queen, has been Madame Wu, the Chinese Finance Minister.

SEIZURE OF 20 U.S. BANKS, FEDERAL RESERVE AND TREASURY THREATENED
Madame Wu was reported to have been equipped with a Writ of Execution or Lien from the World Court/ICJ (International Court of Justice) which can declare its own jurisdiction when any national jurisdictions fail in their duties against criminals, especially as China is a sovereign nation with its own Judge in the ICJ – enabling Madame Wu to foreclose on 20 banks, and to seize the Federal Reserve and the US Treasury on behalf of her own defrauded Government, the Group of Seven, the World Court/ICJ and The Queen, should the releases not (as matters then stood) be completed by 5.00pm on Friday 25th April.

Seizure of the Federal Reserve would deprive that decadent private institution of its only asset, namely the contract with the United States of America to print money – so that the United States would essentially cease to be sovereign, and would become a weak satrap of the international community which would remain the case at least until it had put its house in order.

However the releases were NOT completed by 5.00pm on Friday 25th April 2008: indeed, they had not even started. We did hear that two Trustees went to their banks at 4.00pm, within an hour of the deadline, and we thought that this might suggest that the official kleptocracy had suspended its blocking of the Settlements just in time to prevent Madame Wu from exercising her Writ of Lien.

That turned out to be the wrong interpretation. The delay, we learned on Saturday 26th April, was associated with the multiple third party verification procedures, including having documentation systematically signed and stamped by the US Supreme Court – the definitive effect of which was intended to be, to prevent any possibility of further highest-level US criminalist resistance and impediments to the Settlements, and thus to the refinancing of the United States and the world financial economies, and to the fifth refloating of the US dollar (see our report dated 17th April).

One cannot very well have transactions and the availability of funds verified by people who have lied, stolen and deceived for years on an open-ended basis.

NOTE: Following further ‘glitches’, to be elaborated later, Madame Wu was reported by sources to have exercised her Writ of Lien over at least FOUR banks by Saturday 17th May 2008. She was now thought to be operating a ‘salami tactics’ approach, with each successive failure to perform being following by the widening of her Writ of Execution to additional banks. The Liens on these banks destroy their creditworthiness. As of Saturday morning, this strategy was reported to be having the necessary effect. We will be reporting further on these developments [17th May 2008].

EXTENSIVE THIRD-PARTY VERIFICATION PROCEDURES
Hence, the necessary and agreed-upon third party verification and confirmation procedures, to confirm ‘eyes-on’ that the money was ‘there’, were scheduled for Monday 28th April, not Sunday 27th as assumed by some (which could not have occurred because the banks were not open in the generally accepted sense and such operations could not take place outside normal banking hours, the Editor was advised, without drawing attention to what was happening).

Thereafter, release procedures apparently continued without causing the international community in general, and Madame Wu in particular, undue concern. If documentation has to be verified and stamped, and given that we are talking about Settlements aggregating some $300 trillion, it can be understood that things have been taking ‘a little longer than anticipated’.

A total of 27 of the highest-level US office-holders and officials had been told that any further interference on their part would result in their immediate arrest. It should be pointed out that the ‘arrest’ environment is now much harsher than was even the case when the 4,500-6,000 bankers were being rounded up last October.

On the evening of Friday 25th April, 128 Navy Seals were flown into Washington, DC, from California and Colorado. These operatives do not ring the doorbell: they break the door down with sledge hammers. It is said that Navy Seals ‘eat other military personnel for lunch’.

We took this to indicate that, as Washington, DC, had earlier been said by certain ‘connected’ sources (unverified) to have been discreetly surrounded by the US military, including the 82nd Airborne, since at least March, with deployments to the DC area starting even earlier, arrests of perpetrators were about to begin. According to several reports, between 4,500 and 9,000 arrests were said to be imminent, as of the afternoon of Sunday 27th April. On making enquiries, we had established by late that Sunday that certain people were already being arrested – including, in particular, ‘friends’ of the arch-criminalist Dr Greenspan, who had attempted to steal $8 trillion in the past, and ‘friends’ of his evil partner in crime, George H. W. Bush Sr. However it has not been possible to verify these reports, as everything is being done below the radar.

THE NATIONAL ECONOMIC SECURITY AND REFORMATION ACT
We also understood that documents concerning the National Economic Security and Reformation Act (NESARA), hoarded by Chief Justice Roberts on behalf of the Weltkriminalgesellschaft, had been taken from him, apparently on the orders of The Queen (implemented by MI6, who have been present as noted in the United States (ever since 2006), with the authority of the World Court).

This legislation, signed into law by President Clinton in March 2000, comes into effect when it is announced; and the primary objective of the Bush-Clinton-Cheney kleptocracy, especially since implementation of the Act was deliberately sabotaged by 9/11, has been to prevent at all costs this announcement ever happening – so that their secret financial rapine could continue indefinitely.

Information about the legislation, also known as the Reformation Act, is believed to have been leaked inter alia by Mark Delmart Vreeland, the Office of Naval Intelligence operative, in June 2000 (unverified). This matter has everything to do with the stealing of the 2000 Presidential Election, and with the known fact that Bush Jr’s nickname has been said to have been ‘Temporary’, as he was supposed to have stepped down after six months, to make way for The Reformation Act, which was later rescheduled for 10.00am on 11th September 2001.

Under NESARA, Constitutional Law (the US Rule of Law) is restored and all traces of any fake virtual, or ‘shadow’ (Fascist) fraudulent governance system that lacks all legitimacy, and which has been sending so many people into a state of convoluted frenzy, are defanged. All key members of the Administration du jour are removed, headed in the prevailing context by Bush, Cheney and the entire Cabinet; specified law enforcement personnel take over relevant Government offices, and the Federal Reserve and its personnel are absorbed into a new US Treasury Bank System, as was discussed earlier in Wantagate reports.

As noted, the Reformation Act was to have been announced at 10 a.m. EDT on 11th September 2001, but the buildings were blown up shortly before 9.00 a.m. that day, murdering an unknown number of people. Thus the 9/11 abominations were much ‘worse’ than the Reichstag Fire event of 1933 to which they have been compared.

For this was nothing less than a deliberate, carefully prepared and orchestrated atrocity committed by the criminalist US ‘shadow government’ possibly with foreign criminal intelligence input, against the people and property of the United States, designed to forestall the intended Reformation Act announcements so that the corrupt banksterism carousel could continue. Actually, the PRIMARY objective of the criminalist cadres for years has been to cover up all traces of their criminality.

BITTER TRUTHS ABOUT THE 9/11 MASS MURDER OPERATION
Among those murdered on 9/11 were over 650 members of the staff of the money-broker Cantor Fitzgerald, holder of a sizeable portfolio of original derivatives contract documents, which were destroyed along with the firm’s New York personnel. The destruction of the contracts eliminated the imminent prospect and danger of part of the fraudulent finance carousel being terminated, thereby removing immediate impediments to the further creation of hidden, untaxed fiat money proceeds from stolen contracts and by means of other financial fraud operations.

The Editor does not believe the official tally of approximately 3,000 9/11 victims. His reason for this scepticism is that when he attended at our New York branch office in Midtown Manhattan in the second half of October 2001, the stench of rotting flesh was nauseating, even though Ground Zero was perhaps two miles away from our office. There could be no possibility that 3,000 rotting human corpses could have been responsible for that stench. In February 2002, when he again attended at the New York branch office, the stench had hardly abated at all, depending on the direction of the wind. It is said that Staten Island became almost uninhabitable for some time, so horrible was the pervasive smell of rotting flesh.

The Editor’s opinion is therefore that the 3,000 figure is fabricated, and that the probable number of those murdered in that abomination could very well have been as high as ten times that number. This suspicion was further supported by the impossibility of obtaining any authoritative figures on this subject at all, although we tried for several months to do so.

We recall that by November 2001, all enquiries about casualty rates and about the numbers of staff at businesses located in the World Trade Center were conspicuously leading nowhere. Further, by the end of 2001, significant numbers of US operatives who had been involved or ‘in the loop’, were reported to us to be ‘drinking heavily’. Their sleep was probably haunted, too.

The immediate, knee-jerk finger-pointing at Osama Bin Laden – the CIA asset ‘Tim Osman’, a crude character dressed in a sheet who appeared in a series of ghoulish videos thought to have been filmed in the Las Vegas area – had to be played down after he died on 26th December 2001 in a Midwest hospital, believed to have been located in or near Minneapolis.

NOTE: On 17th May 2008, The London Daily Telegraph ludicrously plastered a report that ‘Bin Laden threatens Israel on its anniversary’ across the top of page 17. The latest ‘Bin Laden’ tape continued the established propaganda norm used by the US terrorism apparat to modulate public perceptions of its ‘War on Terrorism’, notoriously a cover for the Kriminalreich’s global financial depredations, which have been destabilised by the exposures driven inter alia by this service.

The CIA and its ‘facilities’ are evidently not concerned whether one of their assets (a Paulson, a Bin Laden) is dead or alive. If he is dead, and it is ‘necessary’ to represent that he is not, for tactical or strategic reasons, they reckon that they have the capability of sustaining the necessary illusion sine die. They are assisted in this endeavour by the naivete of the ‘mainstream’ media.

The post-9/11 speed with which Bush Jr. dispatched military formations to Afghanistan, and the ongoing preparations for the unprovoked and illegal attack on Iraq, can be explained by a factor that has so far been completely overlooked. The National Economic Security and Reformation Act abolishes unconstitutional states of emergency – since it ‘restores’ the Constitution and the Rule of Law – which means that the American military, which has been deployed illegally, could no longer remain operative in Afghanistan and Iran.

By inventing these evil and destructive wars, the Bush Crime Family and its associates procured what they imagined would serve as a back-stop to prevent any possibility of the Reformation Act being imposed in a ‘worst case’ scenario. Yet they face their ‘worst case scenario’ ‘as we speak’.

Put another way, the practical realities of the massive military deployments have served the back-stop’ purpose, from the perspective of the cadre of US Luciferian operatives who perpetrated or orchestrated the 9/11 abominations, of supposedly ‘precluding’ the possibility of an announcement of the Reformation Act and the consequent ‘restoration’ of the Constitution and the Rule of Law, in any ‘normal’ situation. Yet because the Kriminalreich has since been so decisively cornered as a consequence of the endless fraudulent finance exposures spearheaded inter alia by Wantagate, the situation facing the official criminal perpetrators and their associates today is the very reverse of ‘normal’. People were being rounded up, starting on Sunday 27th April 2008.

The steady ratcheting up of Cheney’s virtual ‘wars and rumours of wars’ propaganda may have represented a coordinated operation to create a diversionary military ‘virtual/real’ standoff – to mask the truth that the criminalists are facing their days of reckoning, at last.

WHY U.S. SHIPS WERE RECALLED FROM CHINESE WATERS
Tellingly, the fact that three US aircraft carriers – USS Kitty Hawk, USS Nimitz and USS Abraham Lincoln – were reported on the 26th April to be leaving the South China Sea en route for the Gulf implied that Madame Wu’s power and Writ of Execution had finally prevailed over the Bush-centred kleptocracy, so that the show of force in the Far East, intended to exert subtle pressure on China not to act as Madame Wu has done, had both failed and had been abandoned.

The last option therefore remained the Middle East region; but with intensified pressure on senior personnel having started on 27th April, it seemed by that date that the global offensive to procure the Settlements and to repay funds stolen from China and other victims, was finally unstoppable.

Nevertheless it remained possible, in our view, that, having been decisively defeated over his serial financial scamming and thefts at long last, President George W. Bush, if allowed to remain in office (perhaps a big IF), might seek a display of machismo abroad precisely in order to mask his humiliating defeat and to signal to the jaded world that the United States remains a brutalised and recalcitrant military bully capable of, for instance, ‘annihilating Iran’ – to use the satanic words of Mrs Jezebel Rodomski Clinton, uttered in some desperation on Tuesday, 22nd April.

There is also a great deal of rumour-mongering about activation of the concentration camps, special orders to the wives of US military personnel to stock up with non-perishables, and other ‘information’, all of which appears to have one factor in common: THE INFORMATION IS ‘VIRTUAL’ For ‘virtual’ information, read ‘lies and diversionary obfuscation propaganda’.

ATTACK ON IRAQ WAS A BRUTAL BANK RAID
To recapitulate important information about the invasion of Iraq that we have published elsewhere, this was effectively a massive bank raid – the initial objective being to annexe the Central Bank of Iraq, steal its gold and currency, and then to change the management at Saddam Hussein’s ‘private’ institution, Rafidain Bank, estimated to have accumulated about $100 trillion in fiat money assets from high-yield trading programmes originally conducted, one may presume, with Saddam’s buddy George H. W. Bush and his cronies. After the gold and currency had been seized from the Central Bank, at least 100 (probably many more) special US operatives associated with that bank raid were massacred in a cynically pre-planned US operation designed to ensure that no information about the raid on the Central Bank of Iraq ever surfaced into the public domain.

The reason that the matter was not completely covered up is that information attributed to an eye-witness source became ‘attached’ to details ‘leaked’ by disgusted US personnel.

The Central Bank of Iraq was then ‘converted’ into a tame, controlled financial trading partner of Weltkriminalgesellschaft Bushe und Klintenstein, GmbH, as we have previously explained.

With trades being directed via the closed Inter Bank Settlement Fund controlled by the US Federal Reserve, hidden, untaxed trading operations could continue below the radar without scrutiny. After this service exposed this dimension of the financial corruption exploiting the Central Bank of Iraq directed from the White House, four floors at the Central Bank of Iraq were suddenly gutted by fire (in January 2008), amid rumours circulating within Iraq itself that some $800 billion of the Central Bank’s assets had ‘gone missing’, believed to have been transferred to Switzerland.

HIGH-LEVEL AMNESTY QUEST ‘NOT GOING TOO WELL’
It was on 22nd April, too, that we established that the primary high-level kleptocrats who had been trying to obtain their World Court/ICJ immunities (implying that they knew that the game was over), were encountering appropriate resistance and were being frustrated in their demands. As one well informed observer put it to us: ‘It’s not going too well for them’.

The same source stated that ‘there are spheres that will not be granted immunity’. It was on that Tuesday that Hillary Clinton, of Russian Jewish extraction, uttered her hysterical public statement to the effect that ‘if Iran touches Israel, I will annihilate it’. Seen in context, this may have been an appeal to her Israeli friends to come to her assistance, given the calamity she now faced (and we are not talking about her nauseating televised set-piece performances on the hustings).

It was also learned on that date that Madame Wu, who was in Washington all that week, having arrived there on Monday 21st April, would be insisting on the arrests taking place – and that she would not hesitate to execute her World Court Writ by seizing, on behalf of her Government, the international community and The Queen, the 20 US banks designated for seizure, along with the Fed and the Treasury, in the event of any further prevarication by the US Forces of Darkness.

In the event, as noted, it transpired that the multiple third party verification process, which was said to make it impossible for the official and bankster mafiosi to renege, meant that the sequence was taking ‘a little longer’ to complete – since for practical reasons, the necessary extraordinary third-party verification and confirmation procedures could not be commenced until Monday 28th April, as already noted. It is true that a great deal of time has elapsed since then, and that all that talk about Madame Wu exercising her Writ of Execution has disappeared out the window.

But we are still informed by our best sources that the information blackout is deliberate, because as well as covering their tracks, the criminalists are hoping that this scandal will stay confined within the Fifth Estate and in International Currency Review.

According to pre-Sarkozy French intelligence, this website collected up to 50 million readers per Wantagate report at one stage, given that 948,000 websites were taking the Wantagate reports, then disseminated by French intelligence, and that each report was attracting some 50,000 hits.

That meant that our readership was 55 times greater than that of, for instance, The Daily Telegraph. Therefore, any suggestion that this huge crisis has been contained and successfully controlled is a figment of the Kriminalreich’s disturbed imagination.

PRESIDENT KENNEDY AND EXECUTIVE ORDER 11110
International tension surrounding the delayed Settlements arose from the determination of corrupt US official and bankster cadres to continue the carousel based upon the debt-financing model that has in fact hollowed out the financial integrity of the United States ever since establishment of the Federal Reserve System in 1913.

President Kennedy understood that the then foreign-owned Federal Reserve Board (the foreign shares in which are believed to have been redeemed in 2006), had to be subsumed by the Treasury if the United States was not to wind up as bankrupt as any nation state can ever become – which, in practical terms, meant that an ever larger proportion of tax revenues would need to be allocated to servicing the colossal mountain of debt behind the US Treasury’s accounts.

Specifically, President Kennedy is believed to have reasoned that by means of a formal ‘return’ to the US Constitution, which requires only Congress to be empowered to coin, print and to regulate money, the one-way escalation of the Treasury’s background (or ‘national’) debt could be reduced because it would cease to be necessary to pay interest to the privately owned US Federal Reserve System, which has an old contract with the United States to print paper money and to lend it to the Government at interest. On 4th June 1963, President Kennedy therefore signed Executive Order 11110, calling for the issuance of $4,292,893,815 in United States Notes through the US Treasury rather than by the Federal Reserve System. On the same date, President Kennedy signed a bill changing the backing of the one- and two-dollar bills (then in wide circulation) from silver to gold, buttressing the weakened US currency’s intrinsic value.

These wise decisions appear to have been influenced by Kennedy’s voracious reading and his consequent understanding of American history – and in particular by the complaints about the Federal Reserve ventilated by Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking Committee in the 1930s. According to The Congressional Record for 10th June 1932 (pages 1295 and 1296), McFadden made the following statement on the floor of the House of Representatives:

‘Mr Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions that the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government Board, has cheated the Government of the United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt’.

‘The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government’.

‘It has done this through the maladministration of that law by which the Federal Reserve Board was established, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it’.

When President Kennedy signed Executive Order 11110, his intention was to strip the Federal Reserve of its power to lend money to the US Federal Government at interest, which has to be financed through tax revenues.

Research recently conducted by the Christian Law Fellowship through the Federal Register and at the Library of Congress, has definitively established that Kennedy’s Executive Order 11110 has never been repealed, amended or superceded by any subsequent Executive Order.

This Executive Order gave the US Treasury explicit authority ‘to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury’.

As a consequence, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were placed into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. United States Notes in $10 and $20 denominations were never circulated but were being printed by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing when Kennedy was assassinated.

Present in Dallas for the assassination on 22nd November 1963 was George Herbert Walker Bush, who is persistently suspected of having been involved in that traumatic outrage against the US Head of State and the American people, on behalf of the private money power and of Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (ongoing Nazi ‘Black’ strategic planning and counterintelligence, Dachau).

As soon as Kennedy had been assassinated, the United States Notes that he had enabled to be issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Furthermore, just five months after President Kennedy was assassinated, no more of the Series 1958 ‘Silver Certificates’ were issued, either.

They were subsequently removed from circulation.

Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes (USNs) achieved wide circulation, they would have eliminated demand for Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs), because while the USNs were backed by silver, the FRNs were backed by nothing.

Given that almost all of the $9.0 trillion of Federal debt (as inaccurately reported) has been created since 1963, Executive Order 11110 should have prevented the United States’ enormous national debt (as inaccurately reported) from reaching its current level. The US Federal Government would have gained the ability to repay its accumulated ‘background debt’ without in fact needing to have recourse to the Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to create new ‘money’ (5), (6).

The ‘Wanta Plan’, as originally conceived, would have achieved part of the same objective, by generating taxed, on-the-books windfall accruals on such a scale as to enable the Treasury to pay down its ‘background debt’ within just a few years.

However, partly as a consequence of an approach made in April 2006 to Coutts Bank in London, at the Editor’s suggestion, by Wanta Attorney Steven D. Goodwin, equipped with a Power of Attorney, and a similar approach made in the same month by the Editor of this service with a restricted Power of Attorney to Lloyds Bank, Aylesbury – both being institutions which the Editor had identified from his analysis of the Leo Wanta banking documents in the public domain as holding Wanta corporate accounts – it may be deduced that the funds held in Wanta accounts have since been repatriated.

The aggregated expanded value of the Wanta accounts, based on the original Wanta $27.5 trillion, is believed to be of the order of $300 trillion – which ‘just happens’ to be the estimated aggregate value of the long delayed Settlements, according to informed sources. (However we are also told that the actual amount of payments could be four times that figure).

CONSEQUENCE OF OUR AUTHORISED APPROACHES TO U.K. BANKS
Almost immediately after our fully Wanta-authorised approaches to the mentioned UK banks, which signalled to the Weltkriminalgesellschaft GmbH that they were no longer in control of the timetable, Leo E. Wanta travelled to California, returning with information about the ‘compromise’ $4.5 trillion Settlement that we then publicised for 23 months on his behalf and with his enthusiastic support, witnessed by successive batches of documents that were faxed by Leo Wanta to the Editor of this service, often labelled URGENT in large capital letters, as is displayed in International Currency Review. But of course, the moment that Wanta accepted this hazardous ‘compromise’, he found himself at the mercy of duplicitous US intelligence and Treasury operatives, who duly hijacked the funds and incorporated them into their own trading platform operations, as we reported. After all, payment of the $4.5 trillion was now a metter for THEM, whereas collection of the $27.5 trillion from the bank accounts, many of which we have listed, could have been masterminded by Wanta alone, if they were ‘his’ accounts, as was the case according to the documentation we have published.

THE NESARA TIMETABLE IS STILL INTACT, BUT OTHER METHODS MAY BE USED
On Monday 28th April 2008, then, verification and confirmation by the US banks in accordance with their Basel-II requirements as promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board in its undated 408-page document made available last November (7), was stated to be proceeding, driven not least by the formidable pressure being exerted by the international community and by the Writ of Execution wielded inter alia by Madame Wu, the Chinese Finance Minister. Given that it is no simple matter to manoeuvre colossal sums of money onto the books, completion was, as noted, taking longer than even Madame Wu and MI6 may have anticipated.

Obviously, given the endless deception that has characterised every stage of this crisis, we are all entitled to remain sceptical: but our very best sources still insist that matters are still proceeding correctly. If this turns out to be inaccurate, we know that certain powerful people who are in direct touch with us all the time, intend to release intelligence which will make it impossible for any of the highest-level US criminalists to escape what is coming to them. These contacts are threatening to release this information: and we urge them to do so if they believe they are still being lied to.

They should NOT allow this matter to drift into June. Send the information to us.

Assuming that a timetable was being adhered to (which did not happen), that left the month of May 2008 for the possible introduction, by due proclamation, of the Reformation Act, and the related replacement of the Bush-Cheney Administration and the Bush II Cabinet by an Interim Authority in the course of this month, allowing for the six-month period stipulated in the legislation during which an Interim Authority would rule the United States, before a general election must take place.

This would procure that the election could occur, as usual, in early November – thereby appearing to ensure a smooth transition from the corrupt, unconstitutional state of affairs that has brought the pariah United States to the verge of de facto bankruptcy, back to Constitutional Government and the Rule of Law. Since we are now approaching the half-way mark of May 2008, however, it looks as though Act Two – the refurbishment of the stables after all the dung has been thrown out – has got stuck somewhere inside the Beltway.

It would be illogical for the United States to have been compelled by the international community, with the assistance of powerful forces within the United States itself that have been seeking the restoration of the Rule of Law, to adopt the Basel-II banking reforms, allowing the US banks just 100 days within which their affairs must be reordered – without completing the job by proceeding with the Reformation Act, or some other measure capable of delivering the same beneficial outcome.

The mechanics of any such operation, we were advised, might involve a complete but temporary communications blackout, followed by the NESARA announcements, which would inform the public that President Bush, his Vice President, the Cabinet and leading officials had been removed from office, accompanied by extensive arrests (which, as noted earlier, started on Sunday 27th April), and that, under the legislation, an Interim Authority had been installed – charged with supervising completion of the return to the Constitution and the Rule of Law.

Promulgation and implementation of the Reformation Act would indeed represent Act Two of Die Meisterschwindlern. It has separately been put to the Editor of this service that Act Two might be procured ‘by other means’ and in a less obvious fashion.

We do remain to be convinced that ANYONE in the United States has the will and the guts to do what is necessary to save the Republic from this criminalist offensive, orchestrated inter alia by malevolent foreign powers, and to procure that Act One is followed promptly by a comprehensive cleansing of the filthy stables. Cleaning out the pigstie is only a first stage. The walls. floor and general structure then have to be disinfected and made good.

Making a mockery of democracy by means of a corrupt and manipulated election ‘peacock process’, amplified via the ‘virtual reality/TV’ system, hardly appears to indicate that the necessary harsh will to follow through exists inside the structures where it matters.

Even so, as the Editor left New York to return to London on 29th April 2008, he was informed that 4,000 troops were said to be guarding the President and the Vice President. This could have been interpreted as implying that their lives were in danger, which, given the immensity of their endless financial criminality, must undoubtedly be the case.

U.S. DOLLAR STRENGTHENS STEADILY ON SETTLEMENTS OUTLOOK
But, along with the steady edging up of the US dollar’s external value – attributable both to actual movements of money and to ‘informed’ Wall Street sentiment – and a general sense on both sides of the Atlantic that much more liquidity would soon become available, we were advised during the week ending on 9th May that colossal amounts of money were being moved, with the key Central Banks engaged on a huge scale, as confirmed by one of our sources with access to ‘the screens’.

The funds have had to be placed ONTO THE BOOKS, prior to the disbursement of the settlement payments, since ‘source of funds’, under Basel-II, has to be transparent – as in the US securities sector. Further, issues that the Editor and Mr Cottrell have discussed on transatlantic phone lines, have started to ‘go mainstream’, while at the other end of the spectrum, anecdotal evidence of hit squads ‘taking out’ enemies, which was always anticipated at this stage of the process – just as happened in 1992 – was being reported.

Such ‘information’, however, could not be reliably disentangled from the desperate obfuscation operations and false reports perpetrated by criminalised disinformation cadres, as they came to terms with the magnitude of the exposures that they never thought could occur.

The intended refinancing of the United States and the world economy to the tune of $300 trillion fully justifies, for instance, Gordon Brown’s ‘bet’ on a ‘significant upturn’. This was not a bet at all: for the British Prime Minister has been fully briefed on the biggest global refinancing in world history, all along, both as an intelligence operative and because of his current position.

In terms of UK domestic politics, this would mean, incidentally, that it would be premature in the extreme for the Conservative Party, which has no discernible policies apart from a sterile, mind-controlled embrace of empty-headed ‘political correctness’, to ‘bank’ on Brown and his disaffected colleagues being crushed beyond repair by recent financial and related economic developments. On the contrary, Brown’s fortunes may improve radically.

CHENEY AND OTHER CRIMINALS STILL PLAYING GAMES EVEN WHEN THE GAME IS UP
On Wednesday 7th May, the Editor of this service received a sudden telephone call asking to know the whereabouts of the Vice President of the United States. Why would Brit know the answer to this question? As it turned out, the Editor was actually able to report, within ten minutes, what he was immediately told by an informed US source: ‘Cheney is in Philadelphia and the riot act is being read to him right now’. This information was fed back to the source of the question in the United States.

By late evening UK time on 8th May, when there was still no news of the releases, the sense was that Cheney may yet again have bribed one or more parties to stall the payments. That is always possible, of course, but there was no confirmation. A further piece of nonsense surfaced to the effect that the French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, who is a key globalist ‘Dark Forces’ player, has some strife going on with respect to who is likely to be the first President of Europe, and that he insists it cannot be allowed to be Blair. We were told, nonsensically, that this latest red herring had interfered with the payments. Next, we will be told that a spider or a cockroach got inside the main giant computer at the European Operations Centre and caused an electronic glitch.

The alleged (virtual) struggle between Messrs Sarkozy and Blair over who is to be President of the moribund corpse of the European Union Collective is probably an orchestrated disinformation ploy perpetrated as usual by the Cheney lie machine – which also perpetrated the lie (on 7th May) that Bush Jr. and Cheney had received their coveted immunities: a typical Cheney lie that we discount totally, although it is always possible that Cheney has used bribery in THIS context: why would the World Court/ICJ give them immunity, which would ‘allow’ them to continue their criminal operations sine die? On 7th May, the Editor was informed, too, that Cheney’s lie machine had disseminated various further lies, such as that a certain Trustee that we know about, had been paid, which we knew NOT to be true – not least since no-one will be able to move any funds at all until everyone has been paid. In addition, we knew that the Trustee in question had not been paid. Now we were fed this nonsense about Sarkozy wanting the Presidency of Europe for himself, in lieu of Blair.

Just for the record, no position of ‘President’ of the moribund EU Collective is vacant, because it doesn’t exist. To begin with, the very prominent British businessman (and contemporary of the Editor’s at Christ Church, Oxford), Stuart Wheeler, has successfully obtained a judicial review of Gordon Brown’s nefarious decision to deny the British people a referendum on the anti-nation state Lisbon Collective Treaty, so that Britain’s position vis-à-vis this Pan-German entrapment device to destroy Britain’s statehood is ‘up in the air’.

Secondly, the Irish have not yet voted in their referendum on the notorious Treaty, while the Upper House in the Czech Republic has serious doubts about the Treaty’s legality and has referred the matter to its Constitutional Court. The same has happened in Germany, of all countries. Therefore, ratification of Lisbon is a long way off, and may be aborted altogether – like its ‘predecessor’, the European Constitution Treaty.

Accordingly, we can dismiss this latest red herring for what it is – namely, yet another lie from the Cheney disinformation camp, which in any case just happens to turn the truth of the matter on its head. For, contrary to what was implied, M. Sarkozy has, after a slow start, been pressing for the conclusion of the Settlements, in support of Her Majesty The Queen (who wowed him and his new wife at the Palace), Madame Wu, and all the other distinguished representatives of the financial community with the single exception of the recalcitrant United States.

LIKELY POLITICAL FALL-OUT IN AMERICA FAR FROM CLEAR YET
It is much harder to read what the political outcome in the United States of any actual completion of the Settlements is likely to be. Among reasons for this are the following:

• The ongoing, wall-to-wall intensity of perverse disinformation, diversionary reporting and wilful deception perpetrated by the criminalised US intelligence sector under Operation Mockingbird and the manipulation of the Fifth Estate (the Internet sector) (8) to mask the headlong involvement of criminal intelligence in fraudulent finance, makes it almost impossible for ordinary Americans to discern truth from CIA lies. Until this monstrous Intelligence Power is defanged, the American Republic will remain in great danger, and the political system will continue to be managed and rigged for the exclusive benefit of the kakocracy and its intelligence community manipulators.

• At the time of going to press/this posting, it was unclear how comprehensive the obvious defeat of the US criminalist cadres was likely to be. Are the stables going to be fumigated, or are they just going to be tidied up for routine Department of Agriculture inspections, enabling the Settlements to be surreptitiously exploited, under the cover of a ‘front operation’ that will be compliant with the Rule of Law, to kick-start a further round of fraudulent finance – as implied by the aforementioned denial of the Editor’s request for a written confirmation that all Wanta transactions would comply with the Rule of Law? On the one hand, the informed expectation that none of the perpetrators will be allowed to ‘get away with it’, is encouraging.

But on the other hand, while Mrs Clinton, the candidate of the Dark Forces, remains on the ticket for the Presidency (not much longer, surely, unless they ‘do something’ to Mr Obama, which would not be beyond ‘them’ at all), the criminalist cadres can be relied upon to rest their rapidly vanishing hopes of ‘business as usual’ on this Jezebel becoming President.

• Likewise, it remained unclear at this posting whether the massive stables cleansing job (Act One of Die Meisterschwindlern) would remain half done, with the second phase, or Act Two – formal and decisive restoration of Constitutional Governance and the US Rule of Law – realised, for instance, through an imminent announcement of the Reformation Act and its consequences, or by means of some other beneficial measure implemented by a corrupt and self-interested Congress motivated by a wish, finally, to cover its own tracks by acting at last in the interests of the American people.

‘ACT TWO’ MUST NOT BE FUDGED OR POSTPONED, OR THE CRISIS WILL RECUR
Unless this, or a measure to the same decisive and lasting effect, is implemented in the immediate future, final completion of the financial releases and Settlements will be liable to refinance not only the US and world economies, but the battered Weltkriminalgesellschaft, as well.

Which would mean that although America’s ‘Main Enemy’ – Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst, Dachau, the Nazi strategic deception continuum driven by its old slogans ‘we shall build the Thousand-Year Reich upon the ruins of the United States ’ (9) and ‘For us the war never ended’ (‘Für uns ist der Krieg niemals vorbei’) (10) – has been severely wounded, it may yet survive to regroup and repeat its mad Luciferian offensive to procure revenge for its catastrophic defeats in two World Wars.

The de facto refinancing the US and world financial economies must not be allowed to provide new cover for a simultaneous and surreptitious refinancing of the Weltkriminalgesellschaft, its corrupt and amoral ‘Black’ intelligence community controllers and those pathetic and misguided Luciferian globalist ‘Dark Actors Playing Games’ who vainly seek to set themselves up as gods purportedly controlling the future of humanity. It remains touch and go whether America will pull itself together in time to prevent these despicably evil people regaining the initiative, which they lost, we believe, partly – or even mainly – thanks to Wantagate.

* ERRATUM:The information that George H. W. Bush lives in The Woodlands area of Houston was obtained direct from The Washington Post. An impeccable source has informed the Editor (12th May) that Mr Bush Sr. lives in River Oaks, which is close to the Downtown and Galleria area. The Woodlands is 35-40 miles North of Houston.

Notes and References:
1. ‘Containing Systemic Risks and Restoring Financial Stability’, Global Financial Stability Report, International Monetary Fund, April 2008.

2. See ‘G-7 demands immediate US discipline and compliance: World community stands up to Bush crime network’, report on this website, Saturday 12th April 2008, filed by the Editor overnight from the IMF/World Bank Press Room in Washington, DC.

3. London Archaeology, Spring 2008, Volume 11, Number 12, pages 312-318.

4. ‘Election Pain for Brown as Tories march on’, lead report, front page, The Daily Telegraph, Monday, 2nd May 2008: final two paragraphs.

5. Report by Anthony Wayne, for Lawgiver.org, The Christian Law Fellowship, April 2008.

6. Executive Order 11110:

Amendment of Executive Order No. 10289 as amended, relating to the performance of certain functions affecting the Department of the Treasury. By virtue of the authority vested in me by Section 301 of Title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:

• SECTION 1: Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended (a) By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j): “(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of Section 43 of the Act of May 12, 1933, as amended (31 USC 821 (b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denomination of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption, and (b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof;

• SECTION 2: The amendment made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made.

JOHN F. KENNEDY, THE WHITE HOUSE, June 4, 1963.

7. Basel II Final Rules, Federal Reserve Board Open Board Meeting, November 2, 2007, 10 a.m. EDT. On page 1, this document states: ‘DATES: This final rule is effective [INSERT DATE]’. As we reported on the website report dated 17th April 2008, ‘Global Refinancing Settlements Intelligence Update: US dragged kicking and screaming into Basel-II mode’, ‘The United States was dragged kicking and screaming like a spoilt child in overdue need of a diaper change into the Basel-II mode with effect from 12:01 am on Monday 14th April, as expected’.

‘US institutions now have 100 days to reorder their affairs to comply in all respects with the Basel-II requirements, as agreed within the international financial community. This represents a massive defeat for the two-headed Luciferian Government of the United States led by criminal operatives President George W. Bush Jr. and his ‘Himmler’ character, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, and their cynical criminalist ‘Box Gang’ co-conspirators’.

8. It has just been revealed that two particularly egregious disinformation platforms – the Sorcha Faal reports purporting to represent postings from inside the Kremlin, but which are revealed to be perpetrated by a US military intelligence operative working with an Irish source (i.e., for the Clinton component of the criminalist ‘Box Gang’), and the website www.whatdoesitmean.com, are American deception operations.

That website has been exposed by the research given below. A list of suspect and intelligence-controlled websites is given on page 512 of the Editor’s work, ‘The New Underworld Order: Dark Actors Playing Games: The Global Fantasies of the Geomasonic Illuminati’: Edward Harle Limited: see the books section of this integrated website.

Exposure of a subversive CIA-controlled website:

Domain Name: WHATDOESITMEAN.COM
Registrar: REGISTER.COM, INC.
Server: whois.register.com
Referral URL: [link to www.register.com]
Name Server: NS.SERVINT.COM
Name Server: NS2.SERVINT.COM
Status: ok
Updated Date: 13-Nov-2007
Creation Date: 12-Nov-2003
Expiration Date: 12-Nov-2009
Current Registrar: REGISTER.COM, INC.
IP Address: 207.58.165.85 (ARIN & RIPE IP search)
IP Location: US (UNITED STATES)-VIRGINIA-MCLEAN
Record Type: Domain Name
Server Type: Indeterminate
Lock Status: ok
DMOZ: no listings
Y! Directory: see listings
Web Site Title: WhatDoesItMean.Com
Secure: No
E-commerce: No
Traffic Ranking: 4
Data as of: 27-Jul-2005
[link to www.networksolutions.com]
[link to www.internic.net]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 195267 (OP)
Data sent to the Editor: 5/4/2008 4:00 AM
Re: Top CIA Agent Killed Trying To Protect D.C. Madam
IP Location: US, McLean, Virginia. Contrary to popular belief, the CIA headquarters is not located in Langley, VA, but in the Langley suburb of McLean,Virginia.

9. ‘We shall build the Thousand-Year Reich on the Ruins of the United States’, one of the rallying cries formulated by the German Geopolitical Centre (Abwehr: Nazi counterintelligence) in Madrid, discovered in Nazi documents seized by the Allies in the final days of the Second World War.

10. ‘For us the war never ended’ (‘Für uns ist der Kreig niemals vorbei’) was accompanied by the elaboration: ‘and as is known, in war, everything is permitted’. This slogan was a key theme of the so-called ‘Madrid Circular Letter’, a document circulated by the Nazi intelligentsia from the German Geopolitical Centre, Madrid, in the early 1950s. The Editor believes that such intelligence, which would have alerted US policymakers to the likelihood that the Cold War had provided the Nazis with long-range cover, was suppressed by the State Department.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

PAULSON INVOKES THE ‘FULL FAITH AND CREDIT’ HE TRASHED

TREASURY SECRETARY ‘COMMITTED’ TO THIS ‘NATIONAL ASSET’

Thursday 20 September 2007 03:45

CONGRESS ASKED TO RAISE STATUTORY DEBT LIMIT UNNECESSARILY

WANTA PLAN MAKES STATUTORY DEBT LIMIT INCREASES OBSOLETE

PAULSON PREFERS DEFICIT FINANCING TO REFINANCING OF AMERICA

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for ‘Wantagate’ reports since April 2006. [Note: A new panel giving details of our latest publications as they are made available, has been added].

Make a Donation to help fund Christopher Story‘s ongoing financial corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial corruption and global financial crisis in history. This website has been calling the shots, because of the hijacking of Ambassador Wanta’s Settlement.

• EMBEZZLEMENT OF WANTA’S FUNDS BY NAMED U.S. OPERATIVES: Keep reviewing our report dated 17th September 2007 [see: Archive]. It proves forgery and fabrication of banking documents. This is an important development which is already having crucial repercussions.

• IMPORTANT: All emails sent to us which lack indentification coordinates are discarded unread.

• 21 SEPTEMBER: CYBER-ATTACK: Our communications were attacked overnight by NSA or other mental defectives. Specifically, we received 230 ‘Mail Undelivered’ notices (that we never sent). These have been deleted and are being examined and traced by our IT associates. If this attack came from some deluded and renegade element of US criminal intelligence, it is illegal and we will publicise the provenance once we have the sources confirmed. SEPARATELY, the drop-down menus on the Home Page are temporarily inactive. However you can easily access details of our publications and books from the Home Page, by pressing World Reports Limited, Edward Harle Limited, etc. Apologies for this aggravation: the cyber attacks are being addressed now.

HYPOCRITICAL STATEMENT TO GULLIBLE U.S. CONGRESS
Henry M. Paulson – the US Treasury Secretary responsible for the destruction of the ‘Full Faith and Credit of the United States’ by illegally stealing and diverting Ambassador Leo Wanta’s $4.5 trillion Settlement since June 2006 – yesterday invoked ‘the Full Faith and Credit of the United States’.

His latest hypocritical intervention was contained in a letter to the US Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, of Nevada, in which he asked Congress to raise the Statutory Debt Ceiling, currently standing at $8,965 billion, ‘as soon as possible’.

Paulson’s letter to Congress contained the following breathtaking assertion:

‘The Full Faith and Credit of the United States, to which we all remain committed, is a national asset and a cornerstone of the global financial system’.

PAULSON WASN’T COMMITTED TO ‘FULL FAITH’ WHEN HE STOLE WANTA’S FUNDS
If that is the case, why did Hank Paulson systematically squander the ‘Full Faith and Credit of the United States’ from June 2006 onwards, by stealing, diverting, exploiting, leveraging and otherwise illegally abusing Ambassador Wanta’s $4.5 trillion – and in the course of these scandalous financial operations, which the owner of the funds, Ambassador Leo Wanta, never authorised – insulting and lying to the Chinese authorities, deceiving and double-crossing Heads of State and high officials of other Governments, and generally conducting himself in a manner inconsistent with the highest standards that should accompany occupation of the elevated post that he holds?

Was not such behaviour conducive to the accurate conclusion that no-one can have faith in a United States led by operatives like Paulson, let alone in its fraudulent credit and financing practices?

Why, if, as he claims, ‘we all remain committed’ to ‘the Full Faith and Credit of the United States’, has he demonstrated, by his irresponsible actions in presiding over the assault on Wanta’s funds since June 2006, his comprehensive lack of any commitment to financial integrity and to the ‘Full Faith and Credit of the United States’, as we pointed out repeatedly in earlier Wantagate reports?

STATEMENT SHOWS PAULSON KNOWS FULL WELL WHAT DAMAGE HE HAS DONE
And why did he consider it even necessary to make this statement affirming ‘our’ commitment to the ‘Full Faith and Credit of the United States’?

Was it not clearly because, for all his arrogance, this man knows perfectly well that the ‘Full Faith and Credit of the United States’ has been irreparably damaged by his own reprobate financial misbehaviour? And yet he imagines that by invoking ‘the Full Faith and Credit of the United States’ after having systematically destroyed it, no-one will have noticed this ridiculous inconsistency?

If ‘the Full Faith and Credit of the United States’ is such a great ‘national asset’, why has this US financial barbarian effectively destroyed it?

Does he seriously imagine that the 50+ million readers of this report around the world, and the senior officials of other Governments and in the international financial institutions who will be reading it too, will already have forgotten how Mr Paulson has squandered the reputation of the United States generally, and how he has repeatedly stolen and diverted the Wanta funds since the disastrous moment that he replaced John Snow as Treasury Secretary?

Does he admire Dr Josef Goebbels SO MUCH that he thinks that occupying the post of US Treasury Secretary entitles him to lie through his teeth as a matter of routine?

KEY RESPONDENT TO WANTA’S PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Henry M. Paulson Jr. is, of course, a Respondent to Ambassador Wanta’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and Other Extraordinary Relief, dated 28th June 2007, lodged with the United States Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division [Civil Action Number: 1-07 CV 609], the text of which is displayed in our report dated 9th August 2007 [see Archive], as well as on pages 137-160 of International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 and 2 – which we distributed worldwide from Central London on 14th September.

The other respondents are: Robert M Kimmit, Deputy Secretary of the US Treasury; Mr James R Wilkinson, Chief of Staff at the US Treasury; Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security; Alberto R. Gonzales, [former] US Attorney General; and the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond [Director and/or Manager of Operations], Richmond, VA.

The Summonses and Returns of Service were all filed under the direction of Colonel Dana Wilcox (US Office of Naval Intelligence) on 27th July 2007. Unusually, the Court gave the Respondents 60 days to comply, which means that the deadline for compliance (that is, payment of the $4.5 trillion) is Thursday 27th September 2007.

This matter cannot go to default without the gravest consequences. The Court possesses the power to order the payment, and to award such extraordinary relief to the Ambassador as it sees fit. The case cannot be sealed until the Wanta payment has been made, and the Ambassador has taken economic receipt of the $4.5 trillion which belongs to him. The documents were served by Clark J. Reynolds, Private Process Server, of Fairfax VA.

PAULSON’S REPEATED THEFTS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORLD’S CRISIS
Should the official Respondents take it upon themselves to defy the Court, an unprecedented constitutional crisis may develop – which would make the recent financial market turbulence appear to have been an enjoyable experience, by comparison with the havoc that will ensue.

• No, Mr Paulson. YOU are the US financial official responsible for payment of Wanta’s $4.5 trillion, and YOU have systematically, perversely, obtusely, criminally, persistently, cynically and indeed CRUELLY blocked the payment of these funds – thereby preventing Ambassador Wanta from taking economic receipt of them (as is his universally acknowledged right), and for the certain long-term benefit of the American people, who are the ultimate losers from your serial treachery.

• YOU are responsible for preventing Leo from meeting his taxation obligations, which – given your status as the US official in ultimate charge of the Internal Revenue Service – is an aggravated felony, to be added to all the other numerous felonies, including R.I.C.O. counts, which you and your colleagues have committed since this scandal (entirely of your own making) began.

• YOU are responsible for the world’s financial crisis – only temporarily stalled, no doubt, if your irresponsible behaviour continues: and every informed financial observer and Government and institutional official around the world knows these statements to be true.

• YOU are no more ‘committed’ to the ‘Full Faith and Credit of the United States’ than is Father Christmas. Your record is a disgrace and it is, moreover, permanently ON THE RECORD: we have just distributed the latest issue of International Currency Review [Volume 33, #s 1 and 2] in which your reprobate behaviour is recorded in graphic detail for posterity to review, and so that neither you nor anyone else can air-brush your abuses of US financial power out of history.

• Your reputation is in shreds, and you have only yourself to blame, Mr Paulson.

TREASURY WOULD HAVE RECEIVED $8.0 TRILLION BY NOW
For if Paulson had not committed treason by presiding over the hijacking of Wanta’s $4.5 trillion in June 2006, not only would Ambassador Leo Wanta have remitted $1.575 trillion (35% of $4.5 trillion) immediately by way of windfall tax paid straight to the Treasury, but the Treasury’s accruals arising from the implementation of agreed capital markets trading under the Wanta Plan would by now exceed $8.0 trillion. Treasury revenues from trades are expected to aggregate $200 billion a week.

Under the Wanta Plan, capital markets operations ON THE BOOKS between the Ambassador’s Commonwealth of Virginia corporation, AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., and the investment banking firm headed by Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., one of the world’s most accomplished securities experts, with six or eight financial institutions, will take place using techniques that are legitimate if tax is paid on the accruals, but which cease to be legitimate in any sense when conducted off the books – as has typically been the case in the underworld for years, with the accruals earned by free-wheeling US operatives exploiting stolen assets, stashed untaxed in secret bank accounts offshore.

Wanta’s immensely beneficial financing operations were supposed to have been kick-started no later than July 2006. The American people have thus been deprived of the massive benefits that should have been flowing from tthe trades by now, and have therefore been DEFRAUDED..

BENEFITS WOULD BE FLOWING FOR ALL AMERICANS BY NOW
In other words, the US Treasury’s irresponsible, ongoing deficit-financing operations, which have continued for a century, would have been placed immediately into reverse by the final quarter of last year – and Congress would never again be required to raise the Statutory Debt Ceiling, which it has been doing ever since the Second World War. (The US Congress uses this residual power to impose its views upon the Executive Branch, but always raises the Statutory Debt Limit in the end, when the Treasury has exhausted various exotic internal financing mechanisms – including using the assets in and special powers of the Exchange Stabilization Fund and the Federal Financing Bank within the Treasury, which is permitted by Statute to have $15 billion of debt outstanding at any given time. Such operations can stave off a Government shutdown for perhaps six weeks).

Obviously, on the hypothetical assumption that 100% of the Wanta Plan’s windfall accruals to the Treasury had been set aside to pay down the US Treasury’s background debt, not only would the concept of a Statutory Debt Ceiling long since have become redundant, but the Treasury would have hardly any background debt left at all.

BENEFITS THAT PAULSON’S CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR HAS THWARTED
Even if, say, 25% of the Treasury’s windfall Wanta Plan accruals had been set aside for paying down the debt, Congress would of course never again need to be asked to raise the Statutory Debt Limit. And the US Treasury’s sales of securities – of which $73 billion in marketable debt will have been issued this quarter, with a further $74 billion to follow in October-December 2007 – would cease.

Yes, this would inconvenience institutions on Wall Street that have grown fat, complacent and overbearingly powerful through financing the US Treasury’s operations; but the only parties that are liable to care about that, would be the overpowerful institutions themselves. They all boast of being frenetically innovative: let them invent alternative financing opportunities. Furthermore:

• The US Treasury and the United States would already have been soundly refinanced.

• Massive and long overdue US domestic infrastructure and other projects, for the benefit of the American people, would by now be well under way.

• The US economy would be thriving as never before, as a consequence.

• The Republican Party would not be facing likely obliteration at the forthcoming General Election.

• The US dollar would have been revalidated, would be appropriately strong, and the international financial system and infrastructure would be in truly excellent shape, rather than on the brink of terminal catastrophe, as is currently the case.

PRECARIOUS, DECADENT STATUS QUO PREFERRED TO LASTING REFINANCING
But Henry M. Paulson, who retained sole signatory power over Wanta’s funds when they were parked with his former institution, Goldman Sachs, in what we have described as the worst conflict of interest in world financial history, evidently knows better. For Paulson and his colleagues:

1. Deficit-financing – which is clearly intended to continue, given that he is asking for the Statutory Debt Ceiling to be raised, in accordance with the projections of the US Office of Management and Budget – is to be preferred to the refinancing of the US Treasury and the United States, agreed to under the Wanta Settlement and Plan, and to which the Group of Eight leading financial powers, as well as the world’s central banks (including the Bank of England, even though it has itself been endlessly engaged in dubious financing practices) have all signified their agreement.

2. The fact that the whole world, with the exception of the criminal clique led by the Bush II White House (we have to reiterate this, because what these people are doing is criminal: see the list of Statutes of which they are in breach, again appended below), has endorsed the need for The Wanta Plan to be implemented, is a matter of indifference to this monumentally arrogant thief – who has stolen Wanta’s funds, he may imagine, with impunity (not once, but many times now).

3. The fact that Her Majesty The Queen has requested urgent payment of the Wanta Settlement ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’ (at last June’s Group of Eight Summit meeting held in Germany) is likewise evidently a matter of indifference to Mr Paulson.

PROJECTIONS FOR U.S. DEBT SUBJECT TO STATUTORY LIMIT
According to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), an appendage to the White House, the Debt Subject to Statutory Limit (which for technical reasons is always moderately greater than the Statutory Debt Limit) is to increase to $9.545.2 trillion by the end of Fiscal Year 2008, and thence respectively to $10.110.6 trillion by 30th September 2009, $10.612.3 trillion by end-September 2010, $11.092.0 trillion by the end of Fiscal Year 2011, and $11.466.6 trillion by the end of FY 2012.

Taking account of minor adjustments and debt issued by agencies other than the Treasury (and omitting the currently unquantifiable aggregate debt of the undisciplined Government-Sponsored Enterprises), ‘total Gross US Federal Debt’ as reported by OMB, will have reached $9.007.8 trillion by 30th September 2007, of which $3.924.5 trillion will be ‘held by Government accounts’. This peculiarity arises because the US Federal Government issues debt to itself.

Specifically, the surpluses accruing in the so-called Trust Funds (which contain earmarked assets that will be needed to meet future obligations) are required by Federal Statute to be invested in the Federal Funds (which accrue funds for current and capital spending purposes).

Leaving aside manifold leakages and extensive embezzlement, this means in practice that the earmarked Trust Funds are ‘blown’ for current spending purposes (i.e., spent).

However, since the long-term (social security etc) obligations for which they were accumulated remain unchanged, the ‘Trust Fund’ balances have to be ‘added back twice’, in order to reach a true picture (on the basis of these data alone) of the ‘debt behind the budget’. And this crude calculation omits compounding of interest.

THE TRUE U.S. ‘BACKGROUND DEBT’ NUMBERS
Accordingly, while the OMB asserts that total Gross Federal Debt at 30th September 2007 is projected at $9.007.8 trillion (consisting of $3,924.5 billion held in Government accounts, and $5,083.3 billion held by the public, including the Federal Reserve, which held $768.9 billion of Federal securities at the end of Fiscal Year 2006), the ‘true’ projected total is $3,924.5 billion + $3,924.5 billion + $5,083.3 billion = $12,932.3 billion (excluding interest compounding).

By the same calculation, whereas the OMB projects that total Gross Federal Debt at the 30th September 2012 will have reached $11.487.3 trillion (consisting of $5,778.2 billion of debt held by Government accounts and $5,711.1 billion held by the public (which includes foreign holders), the ‘true’ volume of ‘background debt’ using these aggregates alone, will amount to $17.263.5 trillion ($5,778.2 billion + $5,778.2 billion + $5,711.1 billion) by the end of Fiscal Year 2012.

Get this, therefore:

• The US Treasury Secretary, Henry M. Paulson Jr., considers it highly desirable that by 30th September 2012, the US Government’s ‘background debt’ (excluding other sources of debt not tediously analysed here, and also excluding interest, compounded) should exceed $17.2 trillion – whereas, if he had not hijacked the Wanta Settlement funds of $4.5 trillion from June 2006 onwards, THE UNITED STATES COULD BY THEN HAVE HAD NO DEBT AT ALL: indeed this would have been the case already for several years. One is compelled to ask: is the Secretary of the US Treasury in urgent need of a brain scan? Is this man completely out of his mind?

• Henry M. Paulson, who has squandered the ‘Full Faith and Credit of the United States’ and has (by his irresponsible and perverse actions) virtually brought the international financial system to its knees, as we have repeatedly pointed out, now has the unbelievable arrogance and effrontery to write to Senator Harry Reid to urge the US Congress to raise the Statutory Debt Limit – citing his ‘commitment’ to the ‘Full Faith and Credit of the United States’ which he describes as ‘a national asset and a cornerstone of the global financial system’, and which he himself has trashed!

Perhaps Paulson’s dialectical speech really does reflect an admiration for Dr Goebbels.

WANTAGATE, TRIGGERED BY PAULSON, LED TO OUR EXPOSURES
Perhaps he hasn’t understood that by blocking, stealing, diverting and exploiting Ambassador Wanta’s $4.5 trillion Settlement, he created the incentive for us to expose the fraudulent finance over which he and his colleagues prefer to preside – and that it is precisely because he hijacked Wanta’s funds, that the international financial economy has been rocked to its foundations, with more shocks undoubtedly to come.

Perhaps he hasn’t even been informed yet that we are increasingly able to prove, with documents, as we began to do in our report dated 17th September 2007 on this website, that US operatives and officials have been engaged in the systematic (and extremely crude) forgery, fabrication, diversion, theft and manipulation of banking documents, Pay Orders, financial assets, corporations, banking accounts and other assets and securities belonging to Ambassador Leo Wanta as sole Principal; and that the longer the Wanta Plan remains unsettled and Paulson’s aberrant behaviour continues, the more US official and ancillary financial criminality will assuredly come to light – with ever more detrimental consequences for the reputations and prospects of those financial criminals who are being exposed, and of the United States’ shattered reputation generally.

PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE OF THE FINANCIAL FRAUDSTERS’ COVER
Perhaps Mr Henry M. Paulson Jr. couldn’t care less that the edifice of illegal fiat money accruals generated through the collateralisation and hypothecation of assets stolen from Leo Emil Wanta’s wholly-owned Title 18, Section 6 corporations, is teetering, as a direct consequence of the Secretary’s mishandling of the situation (to put it mildly), on the brink of becoming worthless.

• OKAY, mountains of contracts were ‘successfully’ destroyed on 9/11, when the contracts held by Cantor Fitzgerald went up in smoke along with that firm’s 658 sacrificed employees, while Enron-related documents were ‘successfully’ incinerated when Building Number 7 was blown up late that afternoon. That meant, of course, that the contracts in question were all ‘forgiven’.

• Mountains of contracts were ‘successfully’ destroyed when the files of Deutsche Bank were burnt in the Iron Mountain fires in London and Ottawa that took place in July 2006, when certain parties realised what was ‘coming down’ – with the same outcome.

• And OKAY, these criminals have been able ‘successfully’, so far, to mask their criminality by inventing a fake, contrived ‘War on Terror’ – providing the pretext for unproductive, massively costly ‘Big Brother’ surveillance, the real purpose of which is to establish how much information about the criminal gangs’ fraudulent finance is ‘leaking’ into the public domain.

How unfortunate, then, that their endless, Goebbels-type lies – for instance, about Osama Bin Laden (the CIA’s ‘Tim Osman’) issuing updated fatwa-tapes as recently as a few weeks ago, when in fact he expired in the United States on 26th December 2001 – are unravelling almost as rapidly as intelligence about their endless financial frauds is surfacing.

The Bin Laden videos are every bit as crude as the careless forgeries of banking documents that we have been examining and exposing, especially given that this operative has been 100% dead for nearly six years now: really DEAD, not falsely dead, like Leo Wanta, whom the CIA claimed was dead and who ceased to be dead when the Editor paid his ransom money in July 2005.

One might have thought that these intelligence operatives would have learned from the collapse of these two gigantic lies alone, that basing everything they undertake upon lies and deception, is proving somewhat – er – counterproductive. But apparently, Not So.

THE LONGER PAYMENT IS DELAYED, THE MORE DIRT WILL EMERGE
One has only to read recent issues of International Currency Review, to see how far this exposure process, triggered by Wantagate, has already gone – and the immense, almost open-ended scope for further exposures of this US financial criminality, that are being revealed almost daily.

And little of all this would ever have ‘come out’, you understand, to cite Ms. Gwendolyn Waymark herself [see our report dated 17th September: Archive], if Mr Paulson and his colleagues had not hijacked Ambassador Wanta’s $4.5 trillion Settlement from June 2006 onwards.

Yes, it could indeed still have been brushed, somehow, under a colossal Iranian carpet back in June 2006, had the Wanta funds not been stolen – because, if Mr Paulson-Goebbels had fulfilled his solemn obligations, we would not have had the opportunity, and the obligation, to bring all these sordid ongoing US official financial crimes to the world’s attention.

The Editor has to add that he has been quite staggered at the crude nature of the forgeries and the US lies and deceptions that he has unearthed in the course of this research.

All things considered, therefore, these second-rate US intelligence operatives, all of them, may accurately be described as ruthless, cunning, careless, yes – and unbelievably STUPID, as well.

THE BIGGEST FINANCIAL SCANDAL IN WORLD HISTORY:
Here are the main references for Case #: 1:2007cv00609-TSE-BRP in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria. See report dated 9th August 2007 [Archive]:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Case Number: 1:2007cv00609 – TSE – BRP
Filed: 20th June 2007
Petitioner: Lee E. Wanta
Respondents: Henry M. Paulson, Jr., Robert M. Kimmitt, James R. Wilkinson, Michael Chertoff, Alberto R. Gonzales and Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Richmond
Presiding Judge: District Judge T. S. Ellis III
Referring Judge: Magistrate Judge Barry R. Poretz
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
Cause: 28: 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury demanded by: None

Note: This case cannot be sealed until Ambassador Leo E. Wanta has been paid the $4.5 trillion of his Settlement diverted and exploited illegally since June 2006.

LEGAL RECAPITULATION FROM OUR REPORT DATED 30TH AUGUST 2007:
Reiteration of the fraudulent transactions involving Bank of New York Mellon – a bank so arrogant and conspicuously indifferent both to its tarnished reputation and to its grotesque breaches of US law and of N.A.S.D./S.E.C. Regulations, that it now takes first prize in the crowded competition for the title of ‘Most arrogant and corrupt financial institution in America’:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scienter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• ‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON IS IN BREACH AND OF WHICH THE SIX ‘LEVY BANKS’ MAY LIKEWISE BE VARIOUSLY IN BREACH [CREDIT SUISSE, UBS, DEUTSCHE BANK, BANK OF AMERICA, CITIBANK, THE BANK OF ENGLAND]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is in violation of:
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR SIR LEO WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT THE HIGHEST U.S. LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006, AND HAVE CONTINUED THEIR SERIAL CRIMES EVER SINCE:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war

This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Wanta’s funds.

The Directors and others listed in Part 1 of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and others posted on 11th June may likewise be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious violation of the laws itemised above. This list is reproduced in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, September 2007, on pages 163-168.

U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: MISPRISION OF FELONY:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier Wantagate reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.