Monday 25 February 2008 15:00

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for our ‘Wantagate’ reports since April 2006.

• The white panel below NEWS gives details of our intelligence titles as they are published.

• FORTHCOMING WANTAGATE ISSUE OF INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW: We are preparing a very extensive issue of the financial journal in which every stage of this crisis since June last year will be displayed. This issue will be mailed to subscribers worldwide in the first quarter of this year, and will provide a permanent record, which cannot be expunged, of the multiple twists and turns of this historically unprecedented criminalism crisis, with every sordid detail recorded both for immediate further enlightenment, for future study, and for posterity.

Not a single facet of this hideous crisis has been left out of the record, so that no attempt to cover up what has been going on, is possible. Subscribers will receive their issues under their current arrangements. Others who wish to receive this special issue should use the Contact Us facility on this website to ask for details and specify how many copies of this huge report/issue they would like to receive. Book early while stocks last. We will not be sending free copies: details on request. Order your copy EARLY! This is such a huge undertaking that we have to restrict the print run.

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing financial global corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Our Wantagate reports have been calling all the shots, given the hijacking of Wanta’s Settlement.

• This is the 96th Wantagate report: well over a million words to date.

• BOOKS: ‘The Red Terror in Russia’, by Sergey Melgounov, is published by Edward Harle Limited and available via this combined website. It describes what the Dark Forces pulled off in Russia, and what they may have in mind for the United States and Britain (a.k.a. ‘the Main Enemy’) if we do not pull ourselves together. See also the Editor’s 740-PAGE book ‘The New Underworld Order’, for the detailed background on the World Revolution crisis that we are all living through.

• Note: Kindly keep on not shooting the messenger. The following report is based upon our best information and belief. If matters turn out differently, or the timeframe changes, as has occurred since 9th February, this will reflect developments AFTER collection of the intelligence contained herein. We have flies on walls all over the place, but sometimes they may be on the wrong walls, or the right walls at the wrong time. Abusive, rude and anonymous emails are forwarded to a separate box and are held with the option of exposing their provenance should we so decide. Which we may.


‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

The Editor has a great deal of further information relating to the Settlement(s), and to the reasons for the ‘on again, off again’ Group of Nine sanctions against the United States. Plainly, as at least some people appear to have understood, the lack of open information to date on the application of the sanctions package can be explained by just two alternatives:

1. The Group of Nine (now 20) have ‘backed off’ (not true).
2. The Settlements are in the process of being finalised.

We are not prepared, for reasons we cannot go into at this juncture, to elaborate further at this stage, but will do so when circumstances permit. We did point out that the messenger should not be shot, given the extreme levels of international tension and fluidity surrounding this crisis, which is without precedent in world history – a simple, clear request which has failed to prevent certain despicable anonymous cowards, who do not reveal their coordinates and so have something to hide (unlike this Editor), from taking pot shots at the messenger. We naturally reserve the right, at the appropriate time but not before, to post such messages on this website.

We do not have a contract with anybody to post anything. Therefore, emails demanding to know why we have not posted, are superfluous. We do of course appreciate the multiple kind messages of support. The Editor’s decision on all matters connected with these Wantagate reports, is final, including his decision whether to post or not. Since the Editor publishes the specialist publications and books advertised on this website, he does have other things to do apart from satisfying the curiosity of those demanding further reports and sometimes complaining if there has been a gap. Why should there not be a gap?

We are not beholden to anybody: THAT IS THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS SERVICE.

Since we prefer, for the moment, to withhold the incomplete information that we have gathered in a very large file since mid-February on Wantagate and the Settlements and their association with the global financial ‘reforms’, the Editor posts herewith two previously published essays which throw light on the background to these and related events. These are as follows:

Text of the Editor’s essay introducing the Wanta documents, published in a special Supplement issued with International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 1 & 2

A précis by the Editor of ‘Bush on the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President’, by Justin A. Frank, MD [Regan Books, Harper/Collins Publishers, New York, 2004, ISBN 0-06-073670-4]. Given the cesspit of controversy that has surrounded and engulfed this schizophrenic, it is well worth reading Dr Frank’s analysis, especially from the perspective of the dramatic events since this report was first published in January 2005.

• Note: Prior to, during and following George W. Bush’s visit to Africa in February 2008, a sharp increase was noticed in the instances when Bush appeared on TV. In the ‘former’ Soviet Bloc states, and in dictatorships to this day, it was and is ‘de rigeur’ for the controlled press to display a photograph of ‘the Dear Leader’ on the front page, every day.

The sudden wall-to-wall television coverage of George W. Bush was reminiscent of this well-known syndrome. His repeated appearances were being orchestrated by the official propaganda apparat, to convey the message that, despite George Bush II having again signed his resignation papers (in February), he was still around, still ‘in charge’, and still changing his mind in his familiar cynical Leninist fashion. The announcement that his Presidential Library would cost $200 million did not, of course, raise eyebrows among the controlled ‘mainstream’ media, let alone provoke any of their number to question the source of such funds (stolen off-balance sheet monies, naturally).

Both these essays are the copyright of World Reports Limited, London. Requests for reproduction must be addressed to the Editor, whose decision will be final.

Text of the Editor’s essay introducing the Wanta documents, published in a special Supplement issued with International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 1 & 2

Last spring, the National Security Agency (NSA) authorised the release of documents by the Ronald Reagan Library concerning Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta which serve the purpose of demonstrating that Leo (Lee) Wanta is exactly who he claims to be (which of course the Editor, having met and spent time with him on a number of pleasant occasions) can vouch for – namely, a top-level US Presidential spy who worked for many years directly for the President of the United States, whom he advised personally.

Release of these key documents exposed the then still ongoing (and occasionally reiterated by ignorant folk, to this day) farrago of crude disinformation and false witness concocted by criminal US intelligence cadres whose old lies, including that Leo Wanta was dead, were ridiculed when he surfaced in July 2005 after $35,000 (of this Editor’s private funds) was paid to the Wisconsin State Department of Corrections in order to settle the spurious Wisconsin civil tax assessment used to perpetrate his ‘takedown’.

These private funds were misapplied and also illegally applied by the corrupt Wisconsin State Department of Revenue – a matter to which the Editor is preparing to return decisively – but they did purchase the termination of the Ambassador’s illegal probation, which was ended when Mr Wanta was granted an Absolute Discharge effective 14th November 2005. Had it not been for this development, Wanta would have remained under illegal probation until 28th November 2010.

A selection of 40 pages of the released Wanta documents were published in a special Supplement which was distributed worldwide with International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 1 & 2 [Third Quarter 2007]. These documents were preceded by the following essay, explaining the underlying rationale for the release of these papers:

Showing that Wanta worked directly for the American President

• • Cynical calculations behind the National Security Agency’s
belated decision to release a first batch of Wanta papers

In the ‘old’, overt Soviet Union, Party hacks and operatives against whom the Party developed a grudge, or whom a rival wanted out of the way, were arraigned before a kangaroo court, excoriated publicly, made to suffer various painful forms of disgrace, banished to Siberia, or all of the above, at the whim of whichever ‘correlation of forces’ happened to be in the ascendant at the time. The alternative ultimate sanction, liquidation, was always held in reserve, in case torture or harassment had failed to achieve whatever Luciferian purpose the Party or the victim’s tormentor, had in mind.

Kremlinology – the science of identifying, by observing who was standing closest or next to whom during formal appearances of the power élite on the Kremlin Wall, as an indicator of who was in favour, increasing in favour, or falling out of favour – was developed over the years by Western observers, as a makeshift means of trying to make sense of the incessant power struggles that were presumed to be a permanent feature of political life inside the Kremlin. Basically, the further away from the dictator du jour a leadership operative stood, the greater the assumed likelihood that he would be liable to fall off his perch, and vice versa.

Rehabilitation was the process whereby someone in the Kremlin recalled that a previously disgraced Party figure and/or discarded intelligence operative, possessed information, skills or talents that could now be useful to the Party. Under ‘socialist legality’, there was never any substantive need to ‘right past wrongs’. Essentially, such a person would suddenly find himself back in favour, or enticed back by indications that this was the case, and his name would suddenly reappear in the controlled open media as though he had either never been absent, or had been engaged in important unannounced work for the Party. Either way, no further questions about the victim’s background or past errors was now permissible, as this previously disgraced individual had, all of a sudden, been ‘rehabilitated’.

The verb to ‘rehabilitate’ implies something akin to what happens to a ‘retread’ car tyre. The tyre that had previously been split right down the seam, was now fit once again for its purpose, and so could be re-used as new. Rehabilitated Soviet Party personnel were often treated, by and large, as though nothing untoward had ever happened to them.

Given the close similarity between the way intelligence officers were liable to be mistreated in the overt Soviet Union and the standard behaviour of the US intelligence community when it ruthlessly decides that the services of one of its operatives are no longer required, it is appropriate to enquire as to whether Ambassador Leo Wanta – the top spymaster and taskmaster who served President Reagan personally – has been ‘rehabilitated’ in accordance with the Soviet model.

Under the Soviet model, it has tended to be assumed that the rehabilitee was the beneficiary of the Party’s need to reuse or exploit skills unique to the victim concerned: in other words, the de facto rehabilitation in this sense was represented as a ‘voluntary’ act on the part of, say, the Party. But the case of Ambassador Wanta is different.

In the summer of 2005, an early attempt was made by the dominant US criminal intelligence community to ‘rehabilitate’ Leo Wanta on its own terms. Specifically, after or roughly at the same time as the Editor had agreed to provide the funds for the purpose of ending the Ambassador’s illegal probation, Leo Emil Wanta was invited down to the Virginia area to meet with a Black US intelligence outfit calling itself Multi-Sector Crisis Management Consortium [MSCMC] [see page 149 of International Currency Review, Volume 31, #3 & 4].

The operatives at MSCMC attempted to persuade and entice the Ambassador, and Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., Executive Vice President and Treasurer of Leo Wanta’s Commonwealth of Virginia-based AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., to participate in dubious and/or illegal financial operations in collaboration with them and other criminal kleptocracy parties – thereby seeking to leverage his unique expertise for their own purposes.

The group further attempted to inveigle Mr Cottrell into dubious arrangements which would have compromised his own firm, Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

At one meeting which was electronically recorded, and at which various generals and intelligence officers walked in and out, talking on their mobile phones or writing notes, Leo Wanta stood up, walked round the table, removed the notes that various parties had been taking, tore them into shreds and placed them in the trash.

At such a level, intelligence officers are supposed to be able to recall everything and to have no need to take notes. On that occasion, too, the Transportation Security Agency (TSA) saw to it that the Ambassador’s suitcase did not arrive at the relevant Washington area airport, so that he was inconvenienced with no toiletries, night clothes or any change of clothing throughout the visit. When he returned to base, his suitcase was revolving on the luggage carousel.

On 14th September 2005, Michael Cottrell issued a Notice of Resignation to Multi-Sector Crisis Management, in which he elaborated: ‘Please be advised that the Private and Proprietary [name of] ‘Funding Proposal’ submitted, in good faith, signed, dated and duly executed under H.R. 3723, via email, to Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., to Mr Neil W. Thompson … for the Board of Directors’ review and consideration on 10 February 2005, is hereby withdrawn due to bad faith negotiations on the part of MSCMC et al. Further, MSCMC et al, individually and severally, are hereby notified that all members of the Board of Directors/Board of Managers, inter alia, will be held to the Private Agreement of confidentiality, destruction and non-proliferation, and/or use of said proprietary documents, subject to Title 18, USC, Sections 4, 35 and 1970, et seq., and H. R. 3723.

For the sake of further clarification, the relevant text referencing H.R. 3723, The Economic Espionage Act of 1996, is reproduced here [see also page 163 of International Currency Review, Volume 31, #3 & 4]:

‘Whereas, the President of the United States, having signed H.R. 3723 on October 11, 1996, has protected this transaction, by allowing corporations the right to declare their Contracts, Clients, Internal Procedures and Information, and the transactions they engage in as a Corporate or Trade Secret fully protected under Economic and Industrial Espionage Laws of the United States of America and the International Economic Community’.

‘Inasmuch, the names, identities, bank coordinates and other identifying information of persons or entities that are party to this transaction, contained herein, or learned [about] hereafter, shall be a Corporate Trade Secret that shall not be disseminated other than as provided for herein, or as allowed under applicable law. Any unauthorized Disclosure of this private Transaction, parties to, or other material fact of, shall subject the violators to Criminal Prosecution’.

The attempt by US criminal intelligence to ‘rehabilitate’ Ambassador Wanta for their own purposes therefore failed, after the Ambassador and Mr Cottrell became aware that some of the parties had stolen proprietary information and expertise, which falls under this Statute, from Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., and his private corporation, and from Ambassador Leo Wanta.

In other words, criminal intelligence, realising the process that was in train and that maintaining the lie that Leo Emil Wanta was dead would cause the CIA ever more convoluted problems, attempted to ‘rehabilitate’ the Ambassador in bad faith (their normal modus operandi); and the Ambassador quite properly refused to comply.

Over the subsequent two years, the steadfast resistance by the Ambassador and by Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., to all deceptive overtures, plus the exposures that we have been privileged to publicise in International Currency Review, in our associated publications and on our website, have radically altered the situation facing the criminal kleptocracy.

Mesmerised by their own greed for personal gain, and by the pressures of their secret agenda and associated New [Under]World Order funding requirements – and totally indifferent to the urgent necessity for The Wanta Plan to be implemented in order to rescue and refinance the US Treasury and economy – the criminal cadres persisted with the overt and covert exploitation of the financial Settlement that had been negotiated with and agreed by Ambassador Wanta and signed off formally in May 2006, without regard for the cumulative consequences.

These cumulative consequences have included the curious reality that the Rest of the World’s Governments and intelligence services have been made more fully aware of what has been going on, sizeable elements of the intelligentsia in the primary countries have also been informed, and Wantagate has run out of control while these people were busily enriching themselves.

So many cats have been let out of so many bags that the criminal gangsters and classes now face opposition (which they never anticipated) on an unprecedented scale that has been causing them real concern and inconvenience. Senior US officials were arrested during the week ending 15th June 2007, after yet another diversion of the Wanta funds and failure to execute.

While Wantagate gathered momentum, officials, operatives and legislators in a position to provide assistance have sat back to watch ‘which side looked like winning’, instead of helping to procure the necessary outcome and to rescue the US Rule of Law from the Law of the Jungle, which the criminal classes prefer. So deeply has the criminality, extensively run out of Chicago, penetrated, that a senior Pentagon spy told this Editor in March 2005 that ‘it’s check mate’.

He was unaware, of course, that steps would be taken later in the year to procure the release of the Ambassador, who was supposed to be dead, from probation – so that the multiple lies that the CIA had perpetrated against him, constructed on top of the single egregious lie, disseminated to the international financial community, that Leo Wanta was dead, would begin unravelling, exposing the operations of the networks of the financial thieves in the process. And the pace at which the corruption nexus been unravelling, has accelerated ever since.

So, the original attempt to ‘rehabilitate’ the Ambassador on the criminal kleptocracy’s own terms having failed, what has actually happened in this regard?

The assessment of the Principals in mid-June 2007 was that the Ambassador’s ‘rehabilitation’, to the extent that we could discern that it was taking place, has been far from voluntary on the part of those doing the rehabilitating. On the contrary, the ‘Black’ criminal cadres have been forced by the preponderance of evidence exposing their endless corruption manipulations, to begin the process of rehabilitating Leo Wanta – not, it should be understood, to exonerate him, but rather to protect themselves, given the way things are going.

Since many of these people may well follow unspecified senior US officials to jail (without bail), any attempt to make the picture surrounding Leo Wanta look less murky from their perspective, may seem to be a waste of time. But that is the reality. These people have started to see the writing on the wall, and it makes disturbing reading for each and every one of them.

Just imagine: every single US operative who has been involved, in one way or another, including couriers and others, in dimensions of given financial corruption operations, from the highest level to the lowest, is in real jeopardy as a consequence of Wantagate.

The re-establishment of the Rule of Law in the United States and in the Group of Eight countries generally – which means, in practice, that stashing stolen or diverted funds resulting from the exploitation of other people’s money in offshore bank accounts, with no accountability for ‘source of funds’ – is exactly the opposite of the régime that the ‘Chicago’ crooks and their criminal intelligence associates have been exploiting and relying on all these years.

As a consequence, endless avalanches of ‘funny money’ have been diverted as the momentum of Wantagate has accelerated, into dubious collectivised receptacles called ‘Private Equity’ or Hedge Funds which, by mutually agreed Group of Eight special exemption, remain broadly unaccountable and unregulated; with further cascades of ‘funny money’ being switched to prospectively ‘non-compliant’ locations such as Albania, Iceland, Poland, Vietnam (the local stock market of which has risen by 500% since 2003), Northern Cyprus, Dubai and Vanuatu.

These funds represent ‘hot money’ that has been running away from the new, intended ‘Rule of Law’ system which will be re-established as the criminal cadres are progressively destabilized and forced to step back. They will not have been defeated, but will have been forced to adopt the Leninist tactic of ‘one step forward, two steps back’, to regroup and replan their global control strategy. We will have to continue facing these crooks head-on in the future.

This strategy of total world control, by the way, is fundamentally driven not only by Lucifer (‘the god of this world’) but by the criminalists’ own insecurity. Their crude assumption is that, just as they have perverted the US judiciary, they will get to control the international judicial system as well (Cheney et al have already demonstrated, in the course of Wantagate, their ability and willingness to bribe International Court of Justice personnel).

It is essential, they figure, for them to ‘own’ the judicial system worldwide, in order to assure their immunity from prosecution, lifetime jail, and worse.

In reality, of course, this is a delusion, since their mad blueprint for global hegemony omits to take account of the certainty that power and control will remain the permanent subject of dispute, so that The New Underworld Order will, by definition, be inherently grossly unstable, even anarchic – the opposite of their befuddled expectations.

• And that inevitable outcome conforms, of course, to the reality that the devil is the author not of peace, commonsense and good order, but of universal chaos, confusion and lies.

Lying and deceiving, as a way of life, is madness, as all lies decay, like plutonium.

So, why, then, has the US National Security Agency (NSA) released, at such a very late stage, the 40 pages of documents concerning Leo Wanta from the Ronald Reagan Library which we reproduce in this Supplement?

It has already been pointed out that the objective is not to exonerate the Ambassador (he and his associates are doing a convincing enough job in that respect themselves) but rather to alleviate the pain being experienced by the criminal cadres as the truth cascades into the open and their serial financial corruption and other crimes and lies are exposed to the light of day.

In parallel with the release of these documents, certain lower-level US disinformation operatives, scum of the earth, have nonetheless continued retailing gross lies and disinformation about the Ambassador which have no substance. In one instance, lies about Leo Emil Wanta’s operations in Thailand have been the subject of disinformation. The lies being perpetrated here cannot be dealt with because the underlying subject matter is classified: which of course is why the handlers of the particular disinformation operative concerned selected the Thailand context for the purpose.

To those who are not sitting on their brains, such compartmentalised US disinformation agents condemn themselves and destroy their own credibility through their serial aberrations.

When the Editor asked why the lower-level US counterintelligence disinformation muck-rakers were being allowed to continue their serial disinformation and lies, which are simultaneously contradicted for instance by the recently released Ronald Reagan Library documents, the informed response was as follows:

• At strategic level, the criminal intelligence coordinators are being forced to develop a barrier so as to be able to separate themselves and their past actions from the muck-raking that they have long since ordered their subordinate disinformation operatives to perpetrate.

• The strategists cannot now acknowledge to their subordinate disinformation operatives that the Ambassador exists, that everything that he has said in public and that has been published about him by ourselves is true, and that the strategists know that the underlings are perpetrating and disseminating brazen lies in accordance with their handlers’ instructions.

• If they were to ‘come clean’ with their compartmentalised subordinate disinformation operatives, they would in so doing expose themselves and their own deviousness and lies.

• So the muck-raking disinformation agents were being allowed to continue perpetrating their filthy lies as though nothing has happened and as though the National Security Agency (NSA) has not, finally, authorised the release of key documents revealing that Leo Emil Wanta served the late Ronald Reagan, President of the United States, personally, reported to him directly, and was engaged for many years in Top Secret operations abroad on behalf of the President himself.

Specifically, since he was engaged in such international operations, he could not have been, and was not, either resident or taxable in the State of Wisconsin.

A further crucial consideration is also felt to be relevant. This is that, having lied for 15 years that Ambassador Leo Wanta was dead, having embroidered innumerable fabrications about him and repeatedly borne false witness against him, and having cynically prepared the disinformation upon which the perjured evidence and false witness fed to the Wisconsin kangaroo court that convicted him was based, the US criminal intelligence officials faced a problem in that paying him the $4.5 trillion that was agreed under the May 2007 Settlement might (so their thinking presumably goes) subject them to severe criticism for remitting such a large sum of money to an operative whom they had previously asserted to be dead, about whom they have consistently lied for 15 years, and who is falsely described as a felon, when he had committed no crime against US or Wisconsin State law or regulations at all, and has in fact been the victim all along of an orchestrated ‘takedown’ based upon a false State tax assessment which this Editor has proved definitively to have been spurious from the outset – with the tax authorities’ own paperwork demonstrating the fraudulence of their civil tax assessments and long-range offensive against this man, whom they themselves acknowledge to be a diplomat, and the holder of a recognised Diplomatic Passport (DPP). [See updated section on the Wisconsin Department of Revenue in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #1 & 2; and since then, the ‘Wisconsingate’ posting dated 6th August 2007 for details].

Given this bind in which they found themselves, someone inside the NSA finally decided that release of the Ronald Reagan Library documents on Leo Wanta would be appropriate. In other words, someone who, like so many others, had been watching to see ‘who will win’, realised that the time had come to start to build a barrier between the lies and the truth, even though it is far too late for any high-level exoneration.

That, in general terms, is why the Ronald Reagan Library has released these tell-tale documents which prove (not that such proof has ever been needed) that Leo Emil Wanta is exactly who he says he is. In other words, the quasi-rehabilitation has been forthcoming due to the pain that the criminals are suffering, not because of a sudden outburst of goodwill towards the Ambassador. Goodwill? The criminal kleptocracy can’t even spell the word.

The 40 documents that have been released by the Ronald Reagan Library, following clearance by the National Security Agency (NSA), were displayed on pages 7-47 of the ICR Supplement. A brief caption is given beneath each document to place it in such context as was available to the Editor of this service. In some cases, there is hardly anything on the page. However each page tells its own, and part of, the overall story – which is that because of the provenance of these documents, all lies and disinformation perpetrated about Lee Emil Wanta are hereby discredited. ENDS.

Copies of this International Currency Review Supplement, displaying the released Leo Wanta documents may be ordered from this website, for a donation of $50.00. Press ‘Please make a Donation’ at the head of this or any recent Wantagate report. Note: We are a commercial enterprise, operating with no subsidies, and the Wantagate dimension has been financed throughout by the Editor’s private publishing business. Hence, we cannot provide any services, apart from these posted reports, free of charge.

NUMBERS 2 & 3 JANUARY 2005, PAGES 59-68

A précis by the Editor of ‘Bush on the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President’, by Justin A. Frank, MD [Regan Books, Harper/Collins Publishers, New York, 2004, ISBN 0-06-073670-4

In the autumn of 2004, the Editor read a remarkable book by Dr Justin Frank entitled ‘Bush on the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President’ by Justin A Frank, MD [Regan Books, HarperCollins Publishers, New York, 2004. ISBN 0-06-073670-4].

He prepared the following précis of the book, which was published in the Wantagate issue of International Currency Review released in January 2005. Dr Frank’s finds remain of exceptional interest given the absolute chaos that President George W. Bush has inflicted domestically and abroad, his unfettered criminal behaviour, his ruthless and murderous foreign adventures (1.5++ million dead in Iraq, for instance), and the colossal waste of money that his aggressive instincts – clearly traced and elaborated upon by Dr Frank – have perpetrated.

Dr Joseph Stiglitz, the distinguished former Chief Economist at the World Bank, estimates in his new book, ‘The Trillion Dollar War’, written with Linda Bilmes and published in Britain by Allen Lane, that Bush II’s reckless, illegal and utterly amoral assault on Iraq has cost – er – not just three trillion (that’s the estimated cost to the United States alone) but six trillion dollars altogether, because he reckons that the cost to the Rest of the World is the same again.

We have no doubt that President Bush II will be regarded by history (and probably much sooner) as the very worst President in American history – an accolade which, following the disreputable and ruthless criminal Clinton Administration, is ‘saying something’. But Dr Frank, like many others, saw such an outcome as inevitable – given the clearly unsavoury upbringing and background of this dangerously unhinged schizophrenic. It should be added that Dr Frank did not even BEGIN to mention the known occult dimension of the notorious Bush Crime Family.

The following analysis was published, as noted, in January 2005. The Editor has had occasion to direct enquiries to this essay on many occasions, and feels it timely to post this essay now. The President is still in office, still causing mayhem, still presiding over unfettered bribery, and, until very recently, still stealing money. The Editor’s essay was preceded by the following Note:

• One of the United States’ most respected professional psychoanalysts has ‘remotely’ subjected George W. Bush Jr. to psychoanalysis, and has found this man to be paranoid and dangerous. In a well-researched book, presented in very clear and jargon-free English, Dr Justin Frank took the President through his usual procedures. His findings are frightening, and should be taken very seriously. [Text dating from 2004-05].

The truly unprecedented uncertainty into which the whole world has been thrown by developments in the United States, and by the conversion of Britain and the United States into disturbers of the global peace in stark contrast to the previously received international perception of these two leading nations as so-called paragons of ‘democratic virtue’, is further exacerbated by controversy surrounding the character of the President of the United States himself.

Since your correspondent has the highest regard for the intuitive capabilities of certain women who are known to him, it is appropriate here to record that when Mr George W. Bush Jr. was first ‘elected’, an American friend of the Editor expressed dismay and concern, notwithstanding her Republican and Texan roots, indicating her fear that this Mr Bush may turn out to be dangerous, or worse. Your correspondent had earlier been unwisely impressed by Laura Bush’s statement in a pre-election interview in which she had been asked about her husband’s ‘religion’, that ‘in 1988 a friend gave him a One-Year Bible’ (viz., a Bible in which the readings are divided into 365 sessions, one for each day of the year) ‘and he has been reading it ever since’. Given the grotesque, pagan debauchery characteristic of the Clinton period, this seemed to your correspondent to represent a considerable improvement. However it appears that the Editor’s friend was much more perceptive.

Work on George W. Bush’s personality and psychological make-up has been carried out remotely by an American psychoanalyst and psychotherapist, Dr Justin A Frank, and presented in his book, published many months prior to the 2004 Presidential Election, ‘Bush on the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President’ *. Dr Frank’s careful and candid analysis of the President’s mind concludes that he displays and has exerted an innate ability and tendency ‘to exert his destructive power on the world’, that he may turn out to be extremely dangerous, and that he should not be re-elected.

Dr Frank interprets Bush’s mentality by reference to an endless internal battle that he perceives the President endures trying to cope with his anxieties. The author is not a Christian: in fact it is clear that he is, as one might expect, an atheist. He therefore excludes altogether any reference to possible occult influences in this President’s life – a serious omission, given that open reports indicate that they may permeate the family from which he sprang.

The gravity of this omission is all the more serious given allegations that George W. Bush Jr. was allegedly present at an occultic event years ago at which a number of the participants lost their lives. Nor is there any reference in this work to the voluminous evidence of alleged criminal wrongdoing by members of this powerful family, or to its alleged paedophilia and homosexuality.

Among the characteristics of this nevertheless engaging President’s background and psychological make-up which Dr Frank highlights, are these:

• The influence of the privileged, secretive family into which he was born, and its decisive impact on his view of the world, including a simplistic Ariosophist division of the world into good and evil.

• The lasting influence that early fantasies and hurt feelings may have had on his precepts.

• The prevalence of aggressive tendencies, and the sometimes sadistic ways they are unfortunately expressed in his behaviour.

• His attempts to seek escape from his internal turmoil through substance abuse (mainly alcohol in the past), exercise and pre-packaged ‘religion’.

• His relationships with authority figures, both individual and institutional.

• Impaired abilities to mourn, to admit responsibility and to know himself, all of which Dr Frank says are necessary for psychological growth.

• His unwillingness to be, let alone to admit to being, wrong, or to consider divergent perspectives.

• Inconsistencies between his words and actions.

• Inconsistencies between his words and truth.

President Bush seems to recognise that he is an oddity, as he is on record as having remarked: ‘Don’t spend a lot of time trying to figure me out… I’m just not into psychobabble’.

Much the most commendable characteristic of Dr Frank’s book, however, is the clarity of the plain English in which it is written, and thus the absence of psychobabble, which makes it so accessible.

Indicative of Bush’s impaired psychological background is what happened after George, who was the eldest child, discovered that his little sister, Robin, who had been diagnosed with leukaemia in the spring of 1953, had died. Following that diagnosis, the child’s fearful parents underwent a series of extended East Coast trips in an ultimately fruitless pursuit of treatment.

Dr Frank thinks that George suffered badly because he was never told the reason for the sudden absences. Unaware that Robin was ill he was simply ordered not to play with the sister to whom he had become close, on her occasional visits home. After Robin had died in New York in October 1953, her parents spent the next day golfing in Rye.

Mrs Barbara Bush has evidently written revealingly about her experiences as both a mother and a child, so that Dr Frank possessed ample information about her history. Referred to by her offspring as ‘the Enforcer’, Barbara Bush has by her own admission always been the family disciplinarian.

‘She was, by most accounts, a cold disciplinarian, and she spanked the children readily’.

Called “the one who instills fear” by a close family friend, she would boldly break up fights between her sons, “bust them up and slap them around”, according to a brother-in-law. In later years, Mrs Barbara Bush has not lost her willingness to display her own aggressive tendencies before the whole world. For instance, many observers, including Dr Justin Frank, were stunned when she told viewers during an interview in 2004 on the prime-time US TV show Larry King Live that ‘you can criticise me, but do not criticise my children and do not criticise my daughters-in-law and do not criticise my husband, or you’re dead’.

Sensitive US observers whom we respect most, and your correspondent himself, did not believe this outburst to be a mere figure of speech. In Britain, it is still a criminal offence to utter threats. Apparently this is not the case in the United States – a fact which illustrates a telling distinction between the two civilisations. We all thought she really meant it.

The author reveals that Mrs Bush was herself treated harshly by her ‘striking beauty’ of a mother, who paid little attention to the normal aspects of maternal life associated with traditional nurturing. The impression gained is that of distance between mother and daughter, a condition that Mrs Bush clearly passed on in her own family.

Dr Frank relieves all the initial gloom by observing (and we certainly agree) that ‘there’s a lot to like about George W. Bush. Even his detractors during the 2000 campaign praised his humour, humility and general affability. His playful friendliness and informality have often disarmed his many critics and charmed the media; he winks and kids around, jokes with reporters on the campaign trail, and peppers his unprepared remarks with great humour’.

The author’s own researches suggest that children who lose a sibling may react by taking it upon themselves to cheer up their grieving mother, whose hair turned white during the years after the loss of Robin, and whose pain at the child’s loss, Dr Frank believes, was conveyed in spades to George through a stern, restricting facial expression.

George Bush Jr. was known as ‘Bushtail’, always on the go – a condition that today would arouse suspicions of hyperactivity. This may have reflected, in part, the child’s need to externalise his own unintegrated anxieties.

‘Complex thinking cannot take place if the child is unable to regulate his feelings. The child [who is] consumed by negative feelings, or distracted by the enormous effort required to handle them with merely primitive psychological tools, cannot get beyond his desperate need to manage his unmanageable anxiety; thus overwhelmed, the child may well experience any external input as excessive. The premium placed on internal order may thus leave no room for growth’.

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) ranks today as the most common neurobehavioural childhood disorder, according to the American Academy of Paediatrics.

Dr Justin Frank reported ‘that much of what we know of the adult Bush’s work habits and mental practices conforms to various indicators of ADHD.

The two worst problems for adults with this condition are impulsivity and craving.

‘Impulsive behaviour is often mistaken for decisiveness, but in reality the quick decision is often made because the individual is too impatient to sustain his attention long enough to read all the information, or else much too uncomfortable at the prospect of complex thought to weigh things sufficiently’. A U.S. News and World Report mentioned Mr Bush’s aides during his first term as saying that he ‘never agonises over decisions, preferring to gather information, make a decision, and move on’.

The psychoanalyst recalls that the President ‘is known for keeping a strictly regimented daily routine, in which short, heavily scheduled workdays with brief meetings are punctuated by regular breaks for exercise. Some would praise this as evidence of a disciplined mind, but it points equally to a desire to minimise the impact of a short attention span, and to avoid the impulsive behavior that can otherwise result.

As the commentators Eric Alterman and Mark Green have both reported, Mr Bush’s ‘advisors have admitted that the staff usually limits him to just three or four 30- to 45-minute ‘policy time’ sessions per week, about what Bill Clinton engaged in per day. Then, more often than not, the President sloughs off responsibility with the admonishment, “You guys decide it”’.

The book has a mass of revealing information about Bush’s impulsive behaviour. As the Governor of Texas, having summoned a Forestry Service official to the podium to talk about forest fires by shouting ‘Tree man, get up here!’, Bush looked round at the journalists while he talked, ‘stuck out his tongue and made a funny face by puffing up his cheeks like a blowfish’. The author points out that such impulsive, hair-trigger responses to real and perceived threats are common with people with ADHD, who often act before determining whether the threat they perceive is in fact genuine.

They also tend to do the opposite – responding to feeling threatened by choosing to hide or to escape. Thus Bush dabbled in many things before arriving at Harvard Business School, by which time he ‘had a taste of many different jobs but none of them ever seemed to fit’.

In his examination of the President’s personality, the author stresses that his behaviour is highly relevant because of the political ramifications – which, we would add, the whole world is about to see. ‘His defensive measures not only reflect conflicts within his character; they can also cause serious problems that can have a severe impact on the quality of his leadership – and on the quality of our lives’.

People who have known Mr Bush in the past have often said that while he appeared to be affable, in fact his affability hides a distance. ‘As an intelligent person whose access to his intelligence was hampered by disabilities, Bush compensated for his flaws by developing other talents, such as his sense of humor and his uncanny ability to memorize names and faces. People with untreated ADHD can have difficulty functioning as members of a social group, because they find it hard to follow substantive discussion and social interaction’, as Mr Bush’s first Treasury Secretary, Paul O’Neill, discovered whenever he appeared for his weekly briefings with the President. Mr O’Neill noticed at once that Mr Bush was not in the slightest interested in anything he had to say, and that he suffered from EGO (Eyes Glaze Over) throughout their meetings.

Thanks to the diligence of Dr Frank, we now know that Mr O’Neill’s experiences with the President reflected Mr Bush’s short attention-span associated with his ADHD. The author elaborates: ‘Finding it too hard to grasp thoughts coming from multiple directions’, ADHD sufferers ‘often resort to telling jokes and disrupting the proceedings; they content themselves with being one of a group of fun-loving people, and avoid more serious interaction’. So, as a consequence, Paul O’Niell was asked in December 2002 to ‘activate’ the presigned resignation letter which every high office-holder in the United States is required to sign as a condition of his appointment.

An ambitious child with ADHD has to be a leader in order to be a group member, otherwise he can’t be heard, since in a subordinate position no-one would take his outbursts seriously. And indeed, with this man, they need to. Sometimes, it appears that it is not George W. Bush Jr., but something else that is speaking. For instance, on 11th May 2001, he pronounced in Washington that ‘there’s no question that the minute I got elected, the storm clouds on the horizon were getting nearly directly overhead’. We would agree. And on 13th August 2002, speaking at Waco, Texas, of all places, Mr George Bush Jr. remarked: ‘I firmly believe the death tax is good for people from all walks of life throughout our society’.

Reverting to the child-rearing dimension of his studies, Dr Frank speaks of the importance of the breaking and repairing of bonds, which is an essential and normal component of child rearing.

‘In healthy relationships, a pattern is established where the mother understands the pain and shame she has caused, helping the child to regulate his own feelings over time. But hyperactivity can get in the way of this process. Bush’s attitudes suggests that his childhood involved little experience of breaking and repairing; his inability to express contrition, or admit wrongdoing, bespeaks a profound need to deny the possibility of his shame’.

The basic rhythm of ‘breaking and repairing’ also teaches the child that a negative experience can be followed by something positive; in the process, the child learns to tolerate what is bad without having to react violently. But, says Dr Frank ominously, ‘this also seems to be missing from Mr Bush’s repertoire. When a child doesn’t experience relief from his distress, he frequently reacts by defiantly denying outside help or influence, developing a false, grandiose sense of independence’.

Enter the condition of grandiosity which, along with shame, Dr Frank says are symptoms of the learning-disabled person’s inability to construct an internal world that reflects the complexities of life. ‘Such a child’s inner world must be simple, because complexity causes anxiety; when shame is unresolved, compensatory grandiose self-images are allowed to thrive, and magical thinking spawns unrealistic notions that flourish unchallenged’.

Accordingly the material world is simplified to conform to the person’s internal worldview.

This oversimplified grasp of reality implies that the President’s world is populated by cardboard figures who are either enemies or friends (‘doing a good job’). Bush’s notorious references to GRU-President Putin – a ruthless military intelligence officer – have been alarming. First, the President said that he had seen into Putin’s soul when looking into his eyes, as a result of which experience his impression of Putin was positive. However anyone looking into Putin’s soul had better beware; and looking into his eyes would probably be ill-advised, as well.

George Bush wrapped up this assessment by asserting that Putin was ‘willing to wear a cross’, the implication being that this covert Leninist liar must be a ‘good man’ if he’s wearing a cross. In fact, wearing crosses is one of the more grotesque mini-deceptions perpetrated by the covert Soviet Leninists who have been masquerading as ‘reformed’ characters these past 15 years. Thus the late Mrs Raisa Gorbachëv wore a very large cross, even though she and her husband were professed agnostics, and Gorbachëv is Jewish, with a family name of Orbach or Korbach. Stalin II, as MVD Eduard Shevardnadze, the Soviet gauleiter of Georgia, was referred to, had himself christened ‘St George’, for some reason no-one could ever fathom.

The false churchman doing the ‘christening’ was the Catholicos-Patriarch Ilya II of Georgia, who has been a prominent KGB operative since 1962.

An alarming corollary to Mr Bush’s habit of gross factual oversimplification when he is judging between ‘enemies’ and ‘friends’ is that this characteristic was integral with the Ariosophical outlook which formed a key component of the psychological environment within which Nazism took root and thrived. Hitler’s early years in Vienna were disturbed by his dislike of the chaotic polyglot capital city of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, where so many minorities and Jews cohabited. (Also present with Hitler in Vienna in 1913 were Stalin, Lenin and Trosky). The antithesis to that thesis was the ‘pure Aryan’ Germany across the border.

President George W. Bush has demonised the Iranian Islamic régime, which is controlled by an Azerbaijani (President Khatami), masquerading as an Iranian, just as Tehran has demonised the United States as ‘the great Satan’. Hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people, may die as a consequence of these dangerous oversimplifications.

Dr Frank next tackles the question of Bush’s ‘former’ alcoholism, beginning with the question: is he still drinking? The author was (in 2004/05) uncertain about this, noting a number of occasions when the President’s speech has sounded slow and excessively deliberate, in the way that certain secret drinkers sometimes talk to hide their inebriation.

Just before the start of the Iraq War, Tom Shales wrote in The Washington Post, astonishingly, that ‘the President may have been ever so slightly inebriated’.

On other occasions, the President appears to have made up stuff (confabulation); and examples are mentioned. Confabulation ‘is a common phenomenon among drinkers, as is perseveration, which is evident in Bush’s tendency to repeat key words and phrases, as if the repetition helps him to keep calm and stay on track’.

On balance, however, Dr Frank comes to the conclusion that President Bush is what is known in his trade as a ‘dry drunk’ – someone whose alcoholism has not been treated, but has been supplanted by another addiction. Dr Frank asserts that in President Bush’s case the ‘replacement’ addiction is ‘religion’, which Mr Bush ‘got’ after a walk with the ‘Rev’ Billy Graham (allegedly a 33rd degree mason!) on the beach at Kennebunkport in 1985.

Whether this ‘conversion’ has any basis in reality we strongly question. Evangelism is not the way to find Christ. The Billy Graham way of suddenly committing oneself to Jesus Christ has been found to be almost wholly useless: apparently less than 5% of those who ‘choose for Christ’ at those Billy Graham-type sessions, remain committed in their new faith.

True commitment comes though Faith, leading to Grace, which in turn leads to the reading of Scripture and thence changes in attitude and way of life.

In Mr Bush’s case, it is much more likely that the ‘born-again’ religion that he supposedly clings to represents the replacement addiction for his alcoholism. The fact that as Governor he presided over more executions than any other Governor in US history is entirely inconsistent with True Christianity, even though Texans often justify this behaviour as being authorised by the Old Testament. But in reality, the Old Testament was torn up when the vail of the Temple was rent in twain, and was replaced by the New Testament, or Will – which no more sanctions the taking of human life than do the Ten Commandments. Under any circumstances.

On the other hand, there is nothing inherently unnatural about Mr Bush’s reported reliance on his faith for ‘protection’. According to the atheist Dr Frank, ‘the faith that comes from identification with an omnipotent figure restores a sense of inner peace, protecting the believer from feelings of helplessness or powerlessness’.

This cynical observation is included here merely because it forms part of Dr Frank’s diagnosis: as an acknowledged atheist, he must be assumed to have no knowledge of ‘the peace of God which passeth all understanding’ [Philippians Chapter 4, verse 7].

The world of invisible terrorist threats, from a cynical international intelligence fabrication called Al-Qaeda, lends itself to the kind of grotesque mental oversimplification which Dr Frank diagnoses as characteristic of the President’s mentality. It doesn’t matter who the enemy is – the ‘former’ CIA operative Tim Osman morphed into Osama Bin Laden, the spooky scourge of humanity posing in a bathrobe and a beard whose appearance in planted videos made, it is alleged, in Las Vegas, is reiterated whenever the scareism propaganda needs to be ratcheted up to mask a particular nasty incident associated with the global gang warfare called the intensified intelligence war; or Saddam Hussein; or terrorists in general. No matter, Mr Bush Jr. is enabled by his ‘faith’ to see himself as the force of light against darkness. The problem with this chronic delusion is that the President presides over a régime of pitch darkness, elements of which are re-exposed in this issue.

No-one who has been exposed to the swirling lies, evasions, barrages of diversionary “lines” and official disinformation surrounding 9/11 and the US ‘war on terrorism’ – which was being ‘waged’ internationally three decades and more ago, after the Soviets relaunched the global terrorism dimension of the World Revolution – believes a word that the US authorities have ever said about Osama Bin Laden, the ‘former’ CIA operative Tim Osman.

The President no longer mentions him, of course, because, he died in a US hospital on 26th December 2001. This FACT somewhat undermined the integrity of the assessment published by Michael Ruppert, a US operative, police and intelligence investigator and author, who says, in his book ‘Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire and the End of the Age of Oil’ [New Society Publishers, Gavriola Island, BC, Canada, 2004, ISBN 0-86571-540-8], ‘I believe that Bin Laden was, and remains, a CIA/US Government/Wall Street asset. That would explain why he has never been caught. There are still wars to fight’.

‘He can’t be caught for a variety of other reasons, including his family’s enormous and diverse financial connections to the same élites that control the United States’ financial system, and his close interrelationship with a Saudi ruling class that could pull the plug on the US economy…. Osama Bin Laden also knows way too much, and without him, the Bush Administration would have had no excuse for any of what it has done over the last four years. From a strategic point of view, Osama is Dick Cheney’s best friend’.

(All highly embarrassing, given that, as we state above, Osama died on 26th December 2001).

‘Any Saudi assault on the US economy would weaken the United States’ mad efforts to be the last standing contestant in Peak Oil’s deadly game of musical chairs’ [Note: This service does not subscribe to the probably mistaken ‘Peak Oil’ theory, which this intel author endlessly promotes – Ed.]. ‘All we really have left is a beleaguered and overextended military. The military depends upon economic power that is now slipping through the Empire’s hands as rapidly as water through a sieve’ – an interesting premonition of the run on the US dollar which has followed the November 2004 Election. ‘Although the US military is by far the most powerful in the world, it is not more powerful than the world’.

Some 40,000 people did not turn up for work at the World Trade Center on 11th September 2001, unless far more people lost their lives (were sacrificed) than we have been told (which this Editor believes, by the way, to be the case). Your correspondent discovered in late October 2001 that the smell of rotting flesh was nauseating even as far away as our Midtown Manhattan offices, and that the situation was little changed in February 2002: so there remains a strong suspicion in his mind that the numbers actually murdered on 9/11 were far larger than reported.

Our attempts to obtain a list of the tenants of the Twin Towers from their owners, Silverstein Properties, were unproductive. And did you know that the damage inflicted internally at the World Trade Center in 1993, when the first ‘Reichstag Fire’ operation at the huge office complex was attempted, was never repaired? On the contrary, the damaged basement area was left unattended, placed out of bounds by a police cordon. Someone had evidently decided that it would be a waste of money to repair the area.

We wonder why. It is extraordinary (though typical of all US political scandals) that the perpetrators of this ‘Reichstag Fire’ event have succeeded, with impunity, in orchestrating the presentation of events so confusingly, and despite so many ‘smoking gun’ clues that there was inside US official complicity. Which could not have achieved its objective without the complicity of the United States’ controlled and rotten media.

We need not reiterate here the wealth of open information about the extended Bush family’s allegedly ‘dodgy’ background. Dr Frank covers this point well in a single sentence (although he does have much more to say on this subject): ‘Bush was born into a family that was simultaneously of the law and above it, steadily accruing power to legislate even as its actions moved further from the law’. And the family’s true attitude to opposition was encapsulated in the threat uttered by Mrs Barbara Bush during that notorious televised interview with Larry King Live.

Innumerable works have been published which explore the Bush ‘crime’ family’s background. But the US historian Kevin Phillips has summarised all this in his book American Dynasty, described by Dr Frank as ‘a damning and invaluable historical look at the familial influences on our President’s psyche’. ‘Four generations of building towards dynasty’, Mr Phillips observes, ‘have infused the Bush family’s hunger for power and practices of crony capitalism with a moral arrogance and backstage disregard of the democratic and Republican traditions of the US Government’.

Well, of course: if one’s primary preoccupation as an alleged hyperactive serial criminalist, apart from the further accumulation of wealth, may be to guarantee one’s own protection against arrest, indictment and disgrace, who cares about the United States’ traditions or the Constitution?

Several authors have concentrated on this President’s inability to distinguish fact from fiction, i.e. his propensity to lie, which has been reviewed in a number of recent books. David Corn (who may be an intelligence operative, representing here an anti-Bush faction), the author of one of them, The Lies of George W. Bush, writes thus: ‘So constant is [Mr Bush’s] fibbing that a history of his lies offers a close approximation of the history of his presidential tenure’.

Mr Corn says that the President’s tendency to be ‘economical with the truth’ is or was masked by the ‘honest-man routine’ which characterised his election campaign in 2000: but ‘a candidate who rises to power by denouncing the lies of others, warrants more attention when he himself engages in dishonest behavior’.

When Dr Frank looks into this dimension of the President’s behaviour, we discover something else disturbing; that he evidently doesn’t care – just as he doesn’t care about the 100,000+ Iraqis, the untold numbers of Afghanis, and the 150+ Texans for whose executions he is responsible.

‘The ease and frequency with which Bush misrepresents the truth’, writes Dr Frank, ‘gain new resonance when seen in the context of a personality that considers itself exempt from the laws that govern others. Why doesn’t he tell the truth? Because he doesn’t have to. Mr Bush gets away with lying not because he is good at it – he’s not – but because in his formulation there’s nothing to get away with: the laws of accuracy mean little or nothing to him’.

In this respect, there is of course little to choose between the lying former President Clinton – his fellow ‘Box Gang’ operative – and George Jr.

But it gets worse: ‘In this light, his simplified worldview is especially important. His capacity to identify and convey the truth relies upon a mental apparatus so primitive and misguided that he may well be unable to recognize his limitations and mistakes. Though there’s no way of knowing for sure – even for him – we’ve seen enough of his personality to suspect that he may actually believe many of his dubious claims; encumbered by a self-serving, underdeveloped way of seeing the world, he simply lacks the tools to differentiate telling lies from speaking the truth’.
Or, in other words, he ‘can’t help it’.

The analysis then considers some of the large litany of instances in which President Bush has defied the authority of truth. The author cited the instance of his military service and his profitable sale of Harken Energy stock in 1990, allegedly with the benefit of certain insider information. ‘He compounded his dishonesty by offering conflicting explanations and ultimately misrepresenting the conclusion of his run-in with authority, claiming to have been exonerated in correspondence from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that specifically said this was not the case’.

The technique of offering a large number of conflicting explanations to explain a given act of wrongdoing appears to have been learned from his own father, George Bush Sr. According to analysts, Mr Bush Sr. used this device following the ‘October Surprise’ operation [see page 99], under which the Iranians accepted $35 million in bribes (after some $27 million of the CIA’s bribery cash had been stolen by US actives engaged in the scam) in exchange for their agreement not to release the 52 American hostages captured in Tehran on 4th November 1979 until after the US Presidential Election scheduled for exactly one year later (4th November 1980), in order to guarantee the humiliation and defeat of the then- Democratic President Jimmy Carter, and the victory of Ronald Reagan and George Bush Sr.

The analysts say that George Bush Sr. had, by August 2003, offered as many as seven different and conflicting explanations as to where he was during a ‘missing’ 18-hour period, when he was flown to Paris for the negotiations and returned by supersonic aircraft to the United States before his absence could be noticed (which, however, it was)

In a terrifying chapter called ‘The Smirk’, Dr Frank exposes the President’s sadism. ‘Long before he led our nation into war, George W. Bush exhibited an appetite for destruction. As a child, George Bush inserted firecrackers into the bodies of frogs, lighting the fuses and blowing the creatures up. As President of his fraternity at Yale, he used a branding iron to maim young pledges’.

This was, in fact, a reference to the fact that initiates of the occult secret society Skull and Bones at Yale are branded in the small of the back with the letter ‘D’, which stands inter alia for the Greek occultist Demosthenes, who committed suicide at an altar there in 322 BC (322 being of course the occult kabbalistic number of Skull and Bones – as well as (significantly) the area code for Brussels, the intended and de facto interim seat of World Government).

Bush Jr. characterised the hazing operation of ‘branding each initiate just above and in between the buttocks [sic] with the red-hot tip of a wire coathanger’ as equivalent to ‘only a cigarette burn’.

Dr Frank’s findings on this score can be summarised as follows: ‘As the Governor of Texas, he was observed smirking over the executions of death-row inmates, many of whom were later found to have received inadequate legal protection’.

‘Bush’s tendencies toward sadism now play out on a bigger stage, with more resounding results. He orders bombings in Baghdad and proudly shows off the horrifying photographs of the bodies of Saddam’s sons, almost daring the world to look away. He gets an even larger audience for the video footage of Saddam Hussein’s humiliation in captivity, and then demonstrates a very personal sense of triumph at his capture, and glee at the prospect of his execution’.

The US President’s trademark smirk, writes Dr Justin Frank, ‘makes his sadism easy to spot. In the Presidential debate of 2000, he displayed pleasure at the prospect of three Texas criminals being put to death: ‘Guess what? The three men who murdered James Byrd, guess what’s going to happen to them? They’re going to be put to death’.

This odious public remark, made without flinching, further illuminates Mrs Barbara Bush’s threat to Larry King, doesn’t it? At once arrogant and cowardly, that comment, accompanied by the smirk, put the whole world on notice that the act of inflicting pain – and the ‘good’ fortune of having a job that allowed him to do so within the laws of the State – brought Governor Bush a certain pleasure that he was unable to prevent himself from expressing.

Why, then, has there been such surprise at the heinous atrocities perpetrated by CIA operatives and Agency contractors in Abu Ghraib (and in innumerable other locations in Afghanistan, Jordan and on the British territory of Diego García), at the 100,000+ killed in Iraq and at the craven, boastful brutality and barbarism of US forces, as they work overtime to make America more ‘feared’ around the world? The United States is led by a man who, like all Luciferians, has learned to ‘inflict pain without flinching’, a man of fire and ‘peak of anger’.

Dr Frank’s verdict is damning indeed:

‘The Bush smirk conveys both the pleasure he derives from inflicting pain, and the defense he mounts against the discovery of that pleasure – a disclosure of the sadistic impulse, and an attempt to deny the destructive self he cannot bear to acknowledge’.

Dr Frank is fearful, and so are we, that this man will lead the world into the Third World War. He will, the psychoanalyst asserts, engage ‘the nation both as agent and victim in a perilous psychodrama that rages far beyond his control’.

We consider it our duty to draw our international subscribers to these extremely troubling realities.

As for Bush’s ‘Bushisms’ – his convoluted misuse of language, his malapropisms – they can be and have been extensively mined for laughs: one can buy calendars with a Bushism a day for a few dollars. But Dr Frank says that his verbal gaffes and blunders are ‘symptomatic of a patient in dire need of help’. Yet, as noted earlier, some of these serial verbal faux-pas* seem to convey what the President actually means, as in: ‘Security is the essential roadblock to achieving the road map to peace’; or: ‘There’s no doubt in my mind that we should allow the world’s worst leaders to hold America hostage, to threaten our peace, to threaten our friends and allies with the world’s worst weapons’; or: ‘We need an energy bill that encourages consumption’.

To these Freudian slips the President adds other familiar verbal distortions – the bland repetition of phrases (as noted), techniques to deflect questions, evasive answers, the loss of coherence in tangential speech. Closer inspection ‘reveals that Bush doesn’t just struggle with language; he perverts it, in ways that reveal a capacity for indifference and contempt that reverberates far beyond the written word’.

And he is not afraid of contradicting himself. On 13th September 2001, the President suddenly pronounced: ‘The most important thing is for us to find Osama Bin Laden. It’s our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him’. But six months later, on 13th March 2002, after rather too many exposures leading to the general knowledge that Osama Bin Laden is none other than a ‘former’ CIA asset codenamed ‘Tim Osman’, Mr Bush said: ‘I don’t know where he is. I have no idea and I really don’t care. It’s not that important. It’s not our priority’.

Actually, Bush knew perfectly well where ‘he is’, since Osama died on 26th December 2001.

He’s in the place where Bush Jr. is himself destined. And he knows that place only too well: he more or less lives there.

*Note: But are the verbal faux-pas actually Bush Jr. speaking? Are his ‘Bushisms’ just ‘Freudian slips’? He shares this curious behaviour with his father. The Editor’s late friend Fr. Malachi Martin would say that both men are ‘possessed’, and the Editor would agree. If that is the case, the voice uttering these ‘Bushisms’ would be that of his ‘familiar’, or the words that come out of Bush’s mouth would be those dictated to him by his ‘familiar’ (or should we say, his ‘familiar du jour’). Because both men, on this perception, which is true, are likely to be possessed by ‘many familiars’:

Mark, Chapter Five, verses 6-9:
‘But when [the possessed] saw Jesus afar off, he ran and worshipped him.

And cried with a loud voice, and said, What have I [singular] to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of the most high God? I adjure thee by God, that thou torment me not.

For he said unto him, Come out of the man, thou unclean spirit.

And he asked him, What is thy name? [in exorcism, Evil Spirit must always be addressed by name. It is a mystery]. And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many’.

Luke, Chapter Eight, verses 28-30:
‘When he [the possessed] saw Jesus, he cried out, and fell down before him, and with a loud voice said: What have I [singular] to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of God most high? I beseech thee, torment me not.

(For he had commanded the unclean spirit to come out of the man. For oftentimes it had caught him: and he was kept bound with chains and in fetters; and he brake the bands, and was driven of the devil into the wilderness).

And Jesus asked him, saying, What is thy name? And he said, Legion: because many devils were entered in unto him’.

Turning to the President’s fraught and dangerous relationship with his father in a chapter headed ‘Oedipus Wrecks’, Dr Frank identified fear of Bush Sr. and his ‘deep rivalrous and aggressive feelings towards his father’ which are manifest in bullying, often with sarcasm.

Without going into the details of this relationship here, the factor which we find by far the most alarming in this context is the younger Bush’s competitiveness – his drive to win at any cost, and his eagerness to be centre stage (similarly to his equally dark accomplice, Tony Blair).

The traditional oedipal dynamic involves the boy’s desire to surpass his father in the eyes of his mother. Yet ‘a man like George W. Bush seeks his father’s approval just as much as his defeat’. Elaborating this analysis, Dr Justin Frank reaches the following alarming conclusion:

‘George W.’s oedipal aggression toward his father is heightened by a defensive hostility, rooted in his fear of being humiliated for needing his father’s love and approval, that he directs elsewhere – often at the weak and needy, who remind him unconsciously of his own unacceptable needs [sic].

The result is an individual who is driven to impress, emulate, and outperform the father he unconsciously holds responsible for his own past and potential future humiliation. At the same time, he is highly motivated to unleash his very considerable destructive resources upon symbolic reminders of his father’s strength and his own weakness’.

On again, off again eports of a rift between Sr. and Jr., evident inter alia from the sacking of ancien régime holdovers, bear this out.

The President told the (CIA-favoured) investigative intel author Mr Bob Woodward that the US Presidency means that he is no longer accountable to anyone for his actions. No-one tells him what to do. He tells others what to do. Dr Frank attaches importance to the President’s first speech to a joint session of Congress after 9/11, which began: ‘Why do they hate us?’, asking: ‘Who is Bush really talking about when he says ‘they hate us’? The analyst comes up with a disturbing response to his own question:

‘Given what we know about the inattentiveness of his parents – who the young ‘Bushtail’ understood to have rejected him – it’s easy to see how this indifference could have been transposed in his mind into hatred, projecting his unrequited longing onto other targets’. In that first post-9/11 speech, too, Mr Bush spoke of ‘sacrifice’ – which meant not only sacrificing so many young American lives that the funeral cortèges into Arlington Cemetery continue from morning to night, with the newly dug graves now spreading out far beyond the area originally intended for them – but also sacrificing free speech: you’re either with us or against us. This attitude reminds us of two young Americans we know who, before the second Iraq war, proclaimed, perfectly seriously, and with great anger, that ‘all Iraqis should be killed. Period’. Does this ring any bells?

The President’s psychological make-up includes an inability to accept responsibility for his failures – his disregard of the law now, on a global, tragic scale, for example; and its twin, an inability to make reparation for his gross mistakes. His reliance on binary thinking and his consequently limited view of the world impedes his ability to recognise the humanity of others, which in turn makes it easier to project negative attitudes onto them.

This leads to a self-perpetuating cycle: once they are perceived as having negative attributes, it becomes even harder to feel sympathy for them; and so on. Accompanying this grim syndrome is the President’s tendency to blame others for the damage he has done.

He denies there is any damage for him to take responsibility for. He declared the war ended while the death toll continued mounting, and has since reached ghastly proportions.

And listen to this:

‘Unable to accept responsibility for his actions, he can neither learn from his mistakes nor avoid repeating them. Unable to repair, he can only break and deny’.

Even more alarmingly, since the second Iraq war may be considered by the President to have been a form of revenge for the damage done to his family’s reputation by the CIA operative William Clinton in 1992, George Bush may believe that revenge equates to reparation, even though the avenger’s satisfactions are only temporary. But ‘revenge is mine, saith the Lord’: if the President were a Christian, he would know that policy and behaviour should never, ever be motivated by revenge. ‘Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath; for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord’ [Romans Chapter 12, verse 19].

The President’s medical records, reviewed by Dr Frank, also contain alarming signals. In the report on the President’s summer physical in August 2003, a number of spider angiomas were reported to have been removed from his nose. Dr Frank elaborated that, even though there was no indication of liver damage, these are a legitimate source of concern since, while they can appear without any apparent cause, they are most often seen either in pregnancy or in chronic liver damage from excessive alcohol abuse.

A second finding which troubled him is the President’s low pulse rate of 35 to 45, which Dr Frank fears may be associated with a suppressed level of arousal to various visual stimuli.

‘Hypoarousal is typical of antisocial personalities; unable to perceive accurately the world around them, whenever challenged or attacked, such people tend to overreact in violent ways. They [may] ignore facial and behavioral warning signs – and then exhibit rage reactions out of proportion to the particular insult’, whether real or imagined.

When we discussed the President’s low pulse rate with a medically qualified expert, she replied, with considerable emphasis, that such a low pulse rate is ‘extremely abnormal’ and should indeed be a source of grave concern.

A third physical characteristic that Dr Justin Frank takes seriously was described by Mr Bush Jr. himself in his autobiography ‘A Charge to Keep’: ‘Laura stays in her own space; I’ve always invaded other people’s spaces, leaning into them, touching, hugging, getting close… I am in perpetual motion, I provoke people, confront them in a teasing way. I pick at a problem’.

Commenting on this, Dr Frank writes:

‘In a standard physical exam that serves as part of a proper psychodynamic formulation, such behavior would automatically raise the possibility of a neurological connection. Such impulsive discharges of energy can be seen as symptomatic of Tourette’s syndrome; the line between a mild case of Tourette’s and ADHD can be a fine one, or the two may coexist. Most adults with Tourette’s who present at clinics for treatment do so because of temper outbursts’ – the kind of event with which the President’s staffers, like Andrew Card, are believed to be familiar.

The President’s extraordinary lack of curiosity may partly explain some of his ‘economies with the truth’. He said after 9/11 that he ‘never saw any intelligence that indicated there was going to be an attack on America’. However the CIA were engaged in ten simulations of aircraft crashing into very tall buildings on the very day of the atrocities (raising the strong likelihood that the simulations were intended as one of the multiple covers for the resulting ‘Reichstag Fire’ event). At the same time, it is quite possible, according to Dr Frank, that Bush saw plenty of such intelligence, but that it made no impression on him whatsoever. The other possibility, of course, is that he knew what the controlling intelligence services were planning.

Paranoia is another characteristic identified in this President. His strict insistence on absolute loyalty, a demand described by Mr Paul O’Neill among others, suggests that his paranoia runs deep. ‘President Bush’s continued habit of seeing the world as peopled with threats… is so consistent and unmistakable that it can safely be described as paranoid’.

And the disengagement that Bush so frequently exhibits is the typical escape of the paranoid individual. Bush’s behaviour is what psychoanalysts call egosyntonic, which means that his actions – ‘the lies he tells and the hurt he inflicts on others – don’t appear to cause him much anxiety’. Dr Frank also thinks that Mr Bush has spent his life in absolute denial of the many sources of his anxiety, and of his haunting fear of retribution.

For Mr Bush, the Presidency is the perfect refuge: as President he [thinks he – Ed.] is in control of everything and [is] surrounded by people who will protect him’ [unless a decision is taken by those who are really in control, to dispense with his services – Ed.]. He is like many CEOs – functioning megalomaniacs who are typically driven to satisfy their grandiose needs through a string of business risks that eventually guarantee failure.

In sum, this man is considered to be extremely dangerous, as Dr Frank’s final words indicate:

‘Our sole treatment option – for his benefit and for ours – is to remove President Bush from office, It’s up to all of us – Congress, the media, and voters – to do so, before it is too late’.

The damage over which this man is liable to preside could range from the degradation of the dollar arising in the context of perceptions of his Administration’s reckless excess spending, to a truly catastrophic series of miscalculations over Iran, Syria and the ‘former’ Soviet Union.

Don’t forget that President Bush has long since misjudged GRU-President Vladimir Putin, who controls him, according to a senior intelligence officer with whom the Editor held an extensive discussion in May 2004. After Mr Putin had left the President’s ranch at Crawford, Texas, on one occasion, Mr Bush suddenly exclaimed: ‘I love him, actually’. Your correspondent formed the view that what Mr Bush Jr. actually meant by this was that he is absolutely terrified of GRU-President Vladimir Putin, but that what came out of his mouth was an inversion of this fear.

What Putin really thinks of Bush is occasionally revealed in off-the-cuff comments – which are always Leninist in character and always contain meanings of relevance to those whom Lenin called ‘the interested’. A Reuters report dated 3rd December quoted Putin, speaking in New Delhi, as having accused the United States of pursuing a dictatorial foreign policy.

‘Even if dictatorship is packaged in beautiful pseudo-democratic phraseology, it will not be able to solve systemic problems. It may even make them worse’, said the GRU operative, with maximum cynicism, as pointedly as possible. As mentioned, only a few weeks earlier, Putin had told George W. Bush in Chile that “his goal is the creation [at home] of a democratic style consistent with Russian history’ [The New York Post, 21st November, page 9]. In both comments, Mr Putin was cunningly making it clear to George Bush that he knew that both powers cynically promoted not democracy but ‘democratism’, but that he is scornful of Mr Bush’s constant references to how he is ‘bringing democracy’ to the Iraqis (that is, to those who have not yet been killed).

At all events, the key point is that George W. Bush has misjudged Putin, so that he may misjudge responses to an intended attack on Iran, Syria, or both, in accordance with the next steps outlined by that that manic (DVD?) geopolitician, Dr Zbigniew Brzezinski in his book ‘The Grand Chessboard: America’s Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives’ [1997, Basic Books, New York], wherein it is recommended that the United States should unilaterally redraw the map of the Middle East and Central Asia to suit its geopolitical and geo-energy interests.

If the President is insensitive to the consequences of his actions, this Administration will not only proliferate dangerous military adventures, but will overspend in every component of the budget, especially domestic ‘security’ and preparations for repression at home. One key reason for this endemic free-spending attitude is that since senior officials are aware of the existence of colossal offshore-based financial resources controlled and accessible by the intelligence community, there is an official mindset which pays little attention to the formal budgetary numbers.

The danger of this manifestation of arrogance is that the international financial markets, being in this respect less well informed than key US officials, will continue to adopt a different view.

Obviously, with policy in the unsteady hands of a man diagnosed by one of the United States’ most accomplished psychoanalysts as being paranoid, unpredictable and dangerous as described, it will be quite futile for analysts to expect that appropriate US financial housekeeping will occur during this troubling Presidency. In addition, all the signs are that the Constitution may be abandoned. The outlook for the US dollar, therefore, could not possibly be bleaker, on the basis of the information elaborated in this section alone.

The last time a crisis of these proportions overwhelmed a great nation was in January 1933. ENDS

This was published, as stated above, in January 2005.

*‘Bush on the Couch, Inside the Mind of the President’, by Justin A Frank, MD, Regan Books, HarperCollins Publishers, New York, 2004. ISBN 0-06-073670-4


• We now repeat, yet again, our familiar summary of the Statutes, securities regulations and fraud information that we have appended to these reports for many months. The reason we append this information is to remind everyone of their clear responsibilities under the US Misprision of Felony legislation, and of course to provide a legal basis for these reports.

Reiteration of the fraudulent transactions involving Bank of New York Mellon – a bank so arrogant and conspicuously indifferent both to its tarnished reputation and to its grotesque breaches of US law and of N.A.S.D./S.E.C. Regulations, that it now takes first prize in the crowded competition for the title of ‘Most arrogant and corrupt financial institution in America’. At least, this was the case until the perpetration of the ‘Saturday scam’ described above and on 13th November:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:


• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.


• ‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.


• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is in violation of:
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.


• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war

This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Wanta’s funds.

The Directors and others listed in Part 1 of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and others posted on 11th June may likewise be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious violation of the laws itemised above. This list is reproduced in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, September 2007, on pages 163-168.

Wicked Pedia Update dated 2nd December 2007:

As previously reported, the Editor’s attention was drawn, in the second half of November 2007, to a pack of old lies, diversionary claptrap and disinformation posted on Wikipedia under ‘Leo Wanta’.

Although this posting appeared FOR THE FIRST TIME on 12th November 2007, it consisted almost entirely of ancient lies, including disinformation dredged out of ‘Thieves’ World’, a hatchet job published in 1994 by Simon and Schuster by the late Claire Sterling, a CIA operative.

Mrs Sterling died suddenly after being summoned for her second meeting with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, under Clinton.

The fact that the OLD Wikipedia lies appeared for the first time as late as 12th November 2007, and consisted almost totally of old, discredited lies, omitting the Master Lie that the CIA retailed after the Ambassador had been taken down, namely that he was DEAD, indicated quite clearly to the Editor and his advisers that this latest evil display of regurgitated disinformation represented a deliberate operation by the US intelligence community’s disinformation and lie machine, to begin, all over again, the process of discrediting Ambassador Leo Wanta – so that they can relieve him of his funds by some false pretext or other after a ‘gag order’ has been signed.

The definitive up-to-date information on the Ambassador’s affairs has been published on this website, and in several issues of International Currency Review, Economic Intelligence Review, Soviet Analyst and Arab-Asian Affairs, all published by World Reports Limited, for several years. Copies of these publications are in official, institutional and library hands all over the world. Therefore, any posting about Ambassador Wanta that relies upon ancient lies and fails to take account of the accurate information that we have published, can easily be demonstrated to represent yet another US intelligence community and NSA discrediting operation.

We now understand that the Principals have been advised (for the past several weeks) that they will not be allowed to reveal that they have been paid. This loony state of affairs is designed to ‘set them up’ for a future discrediting operation whereby false witness will be deployed against them to the effect that they have stolen the money, or some such pack of lies, which they will be unable to refute because they will be bound by the ‘prerequisite’ gag order that is intended. Its purpose, of course, is to ‘legitimise’ the old and new lies that the US disinformation apparat will be preparing for future use. The likelihood is that the new discrediting operation will be extended to Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., as well. We are prepared for this intended onslaught.

On 19th November, the Editor posted on Wikipedia the accurate text about Leo Wanta that is now reproduced below. The Editor’s accurate text was then removed by Wikipedia, leaving the ‘old lies’ that had existed previously. When the Editor became aware of this, he reposted the accurate text below, and, given that his own copy had been deleted, he then deleted the pack of lies, leaving his own accurate text up on the Wikipedia site instead, without the lies.

On 2nd December, the Editor was advised by a monitor that the Editor’s accurate text had been removed and that the old discrediting lies had been reposted on the page by Wikipedia. When the Editor checked, he found that the page could no longer be edited because of what the site managers described as ‘vandalism’.

It was not ‘vandalism’ to delete the truth and to replace the truth by old lies, but it was ‘vandalism’ to delete ‘old lies’ and replace them by the truth.

We are therefore able to conclude from this Wicked Pedia outrage, as follows:

1. Wikipedia, which purports to ‘change the world’, prefers lies to the truth.

2. Wikipedia is therefore, by definition, a source of disinformation and lies, and cannot be trusted as a source of reliable information in any context.

3. The only category of sick society that would have any interest in disseminating lies about Ambassador Wanta, the United States’ greatest living patriot, rather than the truth, is the mentally disturbed US counterintelligence disinformation apparat (a.k.a. the US STUPIDITY COMMUNITY) which, by its actions in deleting the Editor’s ACCURATE information and replacing it with old lies, and by its illegal behaviour in ‘snipping’ our website texts as stated above, thereby reveals the desperation of its concerns, which all have to do with covering up official criminality.

4. It is now far too late for the US stupidity community to repair the damage that it has done since June 2006, when the Ambassador’s funds were first hijacked by the criminal financial operative Henry M. Paulson, US Treasury Secretary. So it is laying the groundwork for a renewed discrediting operation against Ambassador Wanta and his colleagues.

• We and others will see to it that this intention is defeated, and that such nefarious scheming is exposed for the amoral and disgusting Luciferian behaviour that it represents.

The ACCURATE text that the Editor posted on the Wikipedia site, follows. (The Editor, after all, PAID FOR AMBASSADOR WANTA’S EXIT FROM PROBATION, FOR GOODNESS SAKE, SO HE CAN HARDLY BE A SOURCE OF DISINFORMATION, CAN HE?). This information will be very widely distributed by other means, in order to provide all concerned with the necessary ‘heads-up’ as to what these US Dark Forces have in mind. They are out of their minds and in Satan’s mind:

The disinformation about Leo Wanta (Lee Wanta) below was first posted on 12th November 2007. It contains ancient CIA disinformation and long since exposed lies going back to the early 1990s, and obfuscates the truth. The report appended immediately below was added on 19th November 2007, to correct the disinformation contained in the original stub.

It was subsequently removed and is hereby replaced. This sequence of events, which suggests that egregious lies are preferred to the truth, has been recorded on www.worldreports.org, which contains all the updated and breaking Wanta material, that was ignored and traduced in the stub at the foot of this report.

This is the correct information that we posted on 19th November 2007:

The ‘information’ posted below represents a deliberately malevolent, false disinformation picture which has no bearing on reality. It is a travesty of the truth of the matter and cites Christopher Story as the author of some of the disinformation, which is libellous and implies that Story, the veteran
Editor of International Currency Review of nearly 40 years’ standing, is engaged in the egregious dissemination of lies, which is not the case.

This is such an egregiously malevolent stub of disinformation that readers should prudently dismiss it altogether; they should start afresh by accessing Christopher Story‘s website, which is: www.worldreports.org., reading from the Archive.

www.worldreports.org is the authoritative source for all updated information on Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta. The source ‘Thieves’ World’ was a CIA disinformation work prepared by the late CIA disinformation operative Claire Sterling, published in 1994.

This stub regurgitates ancient lies perpetrated by the CIA, which lied for many years that Lee (Leo being his intelligence community name) Wanta was dead. The CIA proclaimed that he was dead so that corrupt cadres could ransack his funds (see below).

He ‘ceased to be dead’ with effect from 21st July 2005 after Christopher Story, a British private citizen, had paid $35,000 from his scarce private funds pro bono publico by way of ‘restitution’ to an American lawyer for onward payment to the Wisconsin State Department of Corrections, to procure Mr Wanta’s release from his illegal probation.

Despite his Ambassadorial status, Wanta had been illegally ‘taken down’ in Switzerland on 7th July 1993 without a warrant on a trumped-up Wisconsin State charge of having failed to pay $14,129 in falsely assessed Wisconsin State fabricated tax that he never owed because he had been resident in Vienna on US Presidential intelligence work since June 1988.

This data is all in the public domain, has been published for several years in International Currency Review, the Journal of the World Financial Community, and can be read on Mr Story’s website.

International Currency Review is a banking and financial journal with a worldwide circulation: ISSN 0020-6490. It is published by World Reports Limited, London.

Notwithstanding that this fabricated tax demand (orchestrated by US criminal intelligence) had been paid twice under protest by Lee Emil Wanta from abroad (in May and June 1992), the funds were improperly allocated by the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue and were never credited to the false account maintained by them for the Ambassador. (Christopher Story holds documentary
proof of both payments). They were paid a third time by Christopher Story in June 2005, which action duly procured Mr Wanta’s release from illegal probation effective 14th November 2005.

As a consequence of Wanta thus ceasing to be dead, the CIA’s lie that he was dead collapsed in chaos, and all the subsidiary old false witness lies that the CIA had perpetrated, including those assembled for disinformation purposes in the stub below (which, in line with the standard false witness used throughout by detractors, attempts to portray Christopher Story as a source of disinformation) were discredited as well.

Why was Wanta taken down? So that the criminal intelligence cadres running the US Government could ransack the $27.5 trillion of funds assembled by Leo Wanta on President Reagan’s orders, in the course of his Financial Warfare operations against the USSR.

Under Reagan’s Executive Order 12333 of 1981, US intelligence officers were permitted to establish corporations which could thereafter contract with the CIA/DIA/DEA/NSA et al for the purpose of fulfilling allotted intelligence tasks allocated to them.

The financial proceeds of operations conducted by such corporations were consequently the property of the corporations and thus of their shareholders, a legal fact of life which has never been, and cannot be, disputed. This was not a good idea because almost all US intelligence
operatives are liars and do not function on the basis of the Rule of Law at all, if they can help it.

Lee Wanta is the well-known patriotic exception to this rule: he operates solely in accordance with US law, in contrast to the behaviour of other US operatives, which is why the kakocracy* needed to remove him from the scene, as duly occurred July 1993.

Once Wanta had been illegally arrested (contrary to international law, as a diplomat) and then thrown into a stinking Swiss jail on 7th July 1993, the criminal cadres inside the US official structures immediately ransacked Mr Wanta’s bank accounts according to plan.

The history of this matter is, and has been, elaborated in great depth on Christopher Story‘s website www.worldreports.org. and has been extensively published, as mentioned, in International Currency Review and other World Reports Limited intelligence publications.

Students are advised perhaps to begin with the ‘Wisconsingate’ report dated 6th August 2007, which forensically dissects, with detailed documentary back-up, the Wisconsin Department of Revenue’s tax fabrication operation against Wanta, stretching back for over 20 years, that has been exposed by Christopher Story in minute detail, and which formed the fabricated basis for Wanta’s illegal takedown in 1993, despite the fact that Wisconsin has no jurisdiction beyond its borders.

The overall Wantagate crisis, which is the sole and continuing underlying cause of the prevailing global financial and economic day of reckoning that the world is now facing, has been triggered by the fact that the George W. Bush Jr. White House, aided and abetted by other senior office-holders, hijacked the compromise financial settlement of $4.5 trillion that the White House itself agreed (in a classified accord that was finalised in May 2006) should be paid over to Ambassador Wanta, so that the stolen and diverted remaining $23 trillion of his funds (and the many hundreds of trillions of dollars hypothecated upon them) could be released from a de facto lien arising from the collapse of the CIA’s lie that Wanta was dead.

For clearly, since he had ceased to be dead, 100% of these funds (plus the hundreds of trillions of fiat ‘funny’ money generated by illegal leveraged operations from that base) belonged to Lee Wanta and to no-one else: a situation that the banks ‘could not handle’.

The entire narrative of what has become the worst financial corruption crisis in world history (which this stub consisting of disinformation attempts to obfuscate) is set out in great detail on Christopher Story‘s website www.worldreports.org., to which all readers are directed in order for the accurate state of affairs to be understood. As indicated, this stub below is a travesty and a disgrace, as it regurgitates long since discredited CIA lies, presents a diversionary, distorted and misleading picture, and because it malevolently incorporates Christopher Story as a source for some of this disinformation.

It is a disgusting instance of ignorant and malevolent US counterintelligence disinformation and deceit at its very worst.

All the statements in the above commentary may be verified by reference to www.worldreports.org and International Currency Review. Another publication covering this matter in detail is Economic Intelligence Review, also published by World Reports Limited, London. Wanta students should access the Archive on the www.worldreports.org Home Page.

A book devoted to Ambassador Wanta and the Wantagate crisis is in preparation

The Wanta disinformation referred to above has been deleted from this page. ENDS.

The Ambassador and his colleagues now have special diplomatic status (conferred upon them by HM The Queen in 2007), which means that the Ambassador is now an Ambassador several times over. This factor greatly complicates the intended discrediting offensive that the mad US stupidity community’s Dark Forces contemplate, their sole objective being of course to cover up their own criminality, in line with pending ‘thought crime’ legislation which has the same Nazi-style objective.

*Note: ‘Kakocracy’: Governance by a clique representing the worst elements of society, in their interests and to the exclusion of all other interests, from the Greek, kakos, meaning foul, or filthy.

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier Wantagate reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s