THE ABORTED PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD OF 8 MARCH 2010

BOTCHED OPERATION BY THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE TO RE-STEAL THE SOVEREIGN

Friday 19 March 2010 08:00

• SALVATORE R DEFRANCESCO ‘SOUGHT BY DOJ, TREASURY’

• PENNSYLVANIA STATE CORPORATION BUREAU FAILS TO UPDATE
CORPORATE SCREEN AS SPECIFICALLY INSTRUCTED BY THE COMPANY’S BOARD

PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD UPDATE: NEW YORK: 19TH MARCH 2010: 3:00PM EDT

There have been two developments (that we are at liberty at this time to report) in connection with this colossal scandal orchestrated as described in our original report of 15th March 2010 below:

(A): PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE HAS RECEIVED THE CORPORATE RESOLUTION OF PENNSLYVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC. [SEE BELOW] BUT HAS NOT AMENDED THEIR SCREEN AS INSTRUCTED BY THE DIRECTORS, WHICH SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE BY NOW:

• The Corporate Resolution of the Board of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. identified in the Foreword immediately below, requires Michael C. Cottrell B.A., M.S., to be described publicly as:

PRESIDENT
CEO
SECRETARY and:
TREASURER

• The United States Postal Service Track & Confirm service reports that:

(1): The package containing the Corporate Resolution and the necessary Filing Fee addressed to Pennsylvania Department of State Corporation Bureau, P.O. Box 8722, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8722, was accepted at 10:44 am on 16th March 2010 at ERIE, PA Station No. 12 [USPS 16505] against total Postage and Fees of $10.70. We hold a copy of the relevant US Postal Service Certified Mail Receipt [and of all relevant such receipts].

(2): The package was processed through the Sort Facility on 17th March 2010 at 4:19pm in Harrisburg, PA 17107.

(3): The package containing the Corporate Resolution and Filing Fee was delivered to Pennsylvania Department of State Corporation Bureau, P.O. Box 8722, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8722 on 18th March 2010 at 1:11am. by the US Postal Service.

• FACT: As of the time of this Update the Pennsylvania Department of State Corporation Bureau had not updated the screen for Pennsylvania Investments Inc. to show Michael C. Cottrell B.A., M.S., registered as:

PRESIDENT
CEO
SECRETARY and:
TREASURER

… of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., as required by the Corporate Resolution.

(B) THE COPY OF THE CORPORATE RESOLUTION AND OTHER DOCUMENTS SENT AT THE SAME TIME FROM ERIE TO MR A. CLIFTON HODGES, ATTORNEY FOR THE CMKM/CMKX VICTIMS, HAD NOT BEEN DELIVERED AS AT THIS POSTING. Specifically:

(1): The relevant package was accepted at ERIE Postal Station
No. 12 (USPS 16505) at 10:42 am on 16th March 2010.

(2): The package arrived at the Post Office, Pasadena, CA, at 8:35 am on 19th March 2010.

(3): We await confirmation that it has been delivered to Mr Hodges. UPDATE: At 4:45pm on 19th March, the Editor was advised that Mr Hodges’ package had arrived. The Editor was out of the office from 3:30pm until 10:00pm on Friday, so this Update was not appended until midnight.

( C): A THIRD PACKAGE CONTAINING THE SAME MATERIALS [FOR A PARTY
WE CANNOT REVEAL AT THIS TIME] HAS BEEN ‘MISSENT’, WHATEVER THAT MEANS.

Specifically:

(1): The relevant package was accepted at ERIE Postal Station No. 12
(USPS 16505) at 10:43 am on 16th March 2010.

(2): The package containing the Corporate Resolution arrived at the designated US Post Office at 8:54am on 19th March 2010.

(3): The next entry states: MISSENT, March 19, 2010, 8:55 am.

We await urgent confirmation that the package addressed to this
important third party has NOT been intercepted, and has been delivered.

(B): SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO REPORTEDLY BEING SOUGHT
BY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND TREASURY AGENTS:

• FACTS:

(1): On arrival in New York late in the evening of 16th March 2010, the Editor received an email
from a knowledgeable source indicating that Salvatore R. DeFrancesco ‘had been’ arrested in the preceding 24/48 hours.

(2): At 14:56pm on 17th March 2010, the Editor received an email from, another informed source who stated that in response to the Editor’s inquiry on this score, ‘so far, I can neither confirm nor deny the recent arrest of Salvatore R. DeFrancesco’, but that he was making further enquiries.

(3): At 10:55am on Thursday 18th March 2010, the Editor received the following email from Mr A. Clifton Hodges, lawyer for the CMKM/CMKX victims of the colossal SEC Phantom Shares scam:

‘I received [the following] information this morning: [quote]: “He is actively being sought by the DOJ and by Treasury agents; he is expected to be in custody by the end of the day”.

Mr Hodges elaborated: ‘I have been promised further information when he is in fact in custody; I will of course pass it on upon receipt’.

(4): At about 1.00pm on Friday 19th March, the Editor made further enquiries as to the status of the REPORTED search for the Mafioso impostor whose name had been illegally inserted as Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. with the full prior knowledge and manifest cooperation of the Pennsylvania Department of State Corporations Bureau and the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue [see original report below], as a result of which we learned as follows:

• The information that Salvatore R. DeFrancesco is being sought by the DOJ and by Treasury agents is reconfirmed [by a ‘special’ source].

• As of the time of this posting SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO HAD NOT BEEN ARRESTED AND WAS THEREFORE NOT IN CUSTODY.

THEREFORE THE WHOLE MATTER REMAINS UP IN THE AIR ‘AS WE SPEAK’.

OUR WORKING ASSUMPTION IS OF MORE SKULDUGGERY
Given all of the above, our interim conclusion is that we are dealing with MORE DECEPTION and that various layers of hastily contrived cover-up operations have been activated to facilitate or cover up the intended giga-theft.

So far as we are concerned, indications that this Mafioso is being sought by the DOJ and Treasury agents must be accompanied by the necessary caution that NOTHING THAT U.S. FEDERAL OR STATE AUTHORITIES ASSERT AS FACT CAN BE TRUSTED.

LIES ARE STANDARD OPERATIONAL U.S. FEDERAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT PRACTICE.

We await further developments.

• NEW SCURRILOUS ATTACK ON THE EDITOR OF THIS SERVICE: FOOT OF THIS REPORT

• FORENSIC DECONSTRUCTION OF A BOLD, BRAZEN WHITE HOUSE CRIME CAUGHT IN TIME

• SECURITIZATION IS ILLEGAL UPDATE: In the Subs/Books Update panel immediately below the NEWS panel that you are currently viewing, you will see an announcement concerning publication of Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 7 & 8. If you press that announcement text and open up the panel, you will see the contents list for the new [2010Q1] issue of E.I.R., including a breakdown of the Chapter Headings for the detailed analysis showing that Securitization is illegal. See our NEWS report dated 10th March 2010 for summaries of some of the data from this analysis. We understand that the report has created uproar in certain corridors of corrupt power.

FOREWORD:

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT RE: PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
Submitted with the $70 necessary filing fee to Pennsylvania Department of State, Corporation Bureau by Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., 1157 West 7th Street, Erie, PA 16502, on 15th March 2010. Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. was incorporated on 11th December 1984 under the following Pennsylvania Statute: 19 PA CODE CH. 35 (1933) P.L. 354, as amended. The Articles of Amendment stated that: ‘The amendment shall be effective on March 13th [2010] at 12:01 pm.’

The amendment was adopted by the Board of Directors pursuant to 15 Pa. C.S. Section 1914(c) or Section 5914(b). ‘The amendment adopted by the Corporation is set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof’. ‘In testimony whereof, the undersigned corporation has caused these Articles of Amendment to be signed by a duly authorized officer thereof this 13th day of March 2010: PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.

[Signed] Michael C. Cottrell: Title: PRESIDENT, CEO, SECRETARY AND TREASURER: 3/13/2010

Exhibit A forming an integral part of these Articles of Amendment:

PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814-453 4453
Email: pii-mcc@msn.com; pii3mcc@gmail.com

EXHIBIT “A”: 13 March 2010

CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION OF CORPORATE RESOLUTION

I hereby certify that at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Pennsylvania, held on the 13th day of MARCH, 2010 at which said meeting a quorum was present and acting throughout, the following resolutions were adopted and ever since have been and now are in full force and effect:

RESOLVED, that due to the attempted fraudulent devices indicated by the PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF STATE (www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp) of 8 MARCH 2010, et al., THIS CORPORATION HEREBY DECLARES any and all corporate resolutions pertaining to bank accounts excluding PNC ACCOUNT, ROBIN DRIVE, ERIE, PA, and all other Securities Accounts, excluding MORGAN STANLEY SECURITIES ACCOUNT (16 November 2005), as NULL AND VOID;

RESOLVED, that since this corporation has never granted a non-owner of shares of this corporation any directorship or office, it hereby grants Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., the retention of full authorities and powers as President, Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary, and is thereby granted full authorization and control of this corporation as per this duly authorized resolution;

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my signature
for said corporation this 13th day of March, 2010.

[Signed]:
Michael C. Cottrell, B.A, M.S.
President, CEO, Treasurer, & Secretary
Date: 3/13/2010

[Signed]:
Diane R. Cottrell, B.A., M.A.
(A.K.A. Diane R. Bertolini, B.A., M.A.)
Shareholder
Date: 3/13/2010

• Note: The Editor of this service holds copies
of these Articles of Amendment and of Exhibit “A” in our files.

• MAY WE INTRODUCE YOU TO SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO?

• ENTITIES THAT BALLOONED VIA ILLEGAL SECURITISATION

• DERIVATIVES EXPLOSION FOLLOWED PAULSON’S HIJACKING OF THE $4.5 TRILLION

• THE COLLECTIVE OF CRIMINAL AMERICAN PRESIDENTS

• MR COTTRELL CHECKS HIS CORPORATION’S STATE SCREEN

• OBJECTIVE: TO STEAL THE IMMINENT PAYOUTS
VIA THE ‘ITALIAN’ IMPOSTOR AS ‘SECRETARY’

• MONUMENTAL BLUNDER BY THE WHITE HOUSE CROOKS AND THEIR ASSOCIATES

• THE IMMEDIATE PREDECESSOR DECEPTION THAT WE ALSO ABORTED

• INDICATIONS OF RECKLESS, RUSHED IMPLEMENTATION

• ROUTINE EMBEDDING OF A STATE BUREAUCRACY
WHEN STRUCTURING SUCH A PLANNED GIGA-CRIME

• COMPARISON WITH THE STEALING OF TAX REVENUES IN WISCONSIN

• WHAT HAPPENED AFTER THE ‘ITALIAN SECRETARY’ WAS DISCOVERED

• CHINESE CONFIRM THAT ‘BUSH SENIOR’ IS STILL INTERFERING

• SUDDEN PHONE CALL FROM THE PA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

• COTTRELL DEMANDS FAXED COPIES OF PA’S TAX RECORDS

• MAFIOSO REMOVED FROM COTTRELL’S CORPORATE SCREEN

• FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE DOCUMENTS MAILED BY MS. CASTILLO

• STARTLING FINDINGS FROM OUR FORENSIC EXAMINATION
OF PA CORPORATE SCREEN DOCUMENTS

• INTENTION TO USE COTTRELL’S INVESTMENT CORPORATION
TO STEAL THE $6.2 TRILLION TRACEABLE BACK TO THE FALL OF 2007

• THEREFORE, AMERITRUST GROUPE, INC. WAS A TYPICAL C.I.A.
‘BLIND’ DECEPTION [SET UP VIA LEVITTE: FRANCE/DVD]

• INCOHERENT ‘EXPLANATION’ BY THE PA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

• PREPARATIONS FOR THEFT PUT IN PLACE SEVEN YEARS AGO:
ASSUMPTION THAT THE PAYMASTER WOULD COOPERATE

• WE HAVE NO DOUBT THAT GEORGE BUSH SENIOR, GORBACHEV, KOHL
AND ACKERMANN WERE EXPECTING TO SPLIT THE QUEEN’S $6.2 TRILLION
BETWEEN THEM, VIA DEUTSCHE A.G.. THAT WAS THE INTENTION.

• SUMMARY OF THE PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD

• DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

MAY WE INTRODUCE YOU TO SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO?
Have you met or heard of Salvatore R DeFrancesco?

Salvatore DeFrancesco Senior, that is.

No? Then may we please have the pleasure of introducing him to you.

It has been reported to us that Salvatore R DeFrancesco Sr. is an associate of, or has current or past relations with, George H. W. Bush, and is well known in certain, shall we say, ‘exotic’ banking and other financial circles, and among ‘the Italian community’ in the United States, doubtless including Chicago. He has influence with a number of important financial institutions.

He is aged about 60, and has a son, Salvatore Raymond DeFrancesco Jr, CPA, aged 40. Prior to January 2003, Salvatore R. DeFranceso Jr. was Chief Financial Officer of Landmark Community Bank in Pittston, Pennsylvania.

In November 2009, Salvatore R DeFrancesco Jr. was reported to be Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Fidelity D & D Bancorp., Inc., positions he has held since January 2003 – as well as serving as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Fidelity Deposit & Discount Bank, both of Dunmore, Pennsylvania.

ENTITIES THAT BALLOONED VIA ILLEGAL SECURITISATION
Salvatore DeFranceso Senior is Vice President of Penn Acceptance Corporation, and is a partner/owner with Daniel and Joseph Limongelli of Penn Acceptance Corporation, Avoca, PA.

Joseph Limongelli is President and Secretary, and Daniel Limongelli is Treasurer of Penn Acceptance Corporation, with their mailing address at 639 Main Street, Avoca, PA 18641-0.

However the Officers of Penn Acceptance Corporation function, according to the Pennsylvania Department of State, from 2007 Highway Suite 315, Pittston TWP, PA 18640-40.

Both Fidelity D & D Bancorp., Inc/ Fidelity Deposit & Discount Bank. Inc., and Penn Acceptance Corporation ballooned in size from 2006 onwards through trading Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) – which, as exposed in our report dated 10th March 2010, are illegal under US and Common Law. All such contracts, being formulated to facilitate criminal actions, are void and fraudulent [see full report dated 10th March 2010 for details].

Yet in the year ended 31st December 2006, Fidelity D & D Bancorp Inc. was a small operation, the audit fee billed by auditors Parente Randolph, LLC having cost $86,203 [2005: $41,259].

Now, as you will recall from our early reports in this series, 2006 was the year when The People’s Bank of China transferred $4.5 trillion to the United States. The transfer was immediately hijacked by Henry M. Paulson Jr. as soon as he became President Bush’s third Treasury Secretary – a man sufficiently corrupt to meet Bush’s daily criminal requirements, which Mr Paulson’s two far-from-innocent predecessors had been, shall we say, less eager to satisfy.

So, instead of being applied for the purpose indicated by the Chinese central bank, the funds were diverted to underpin securitisation operations involving massive leveraging and hypothecation for corrupt and wholly illegal transactions purposes.

DERIVATIVES EXPLOSION FOLLOWED PAULSON’S HIJACKING OF THE $4.5 TRILLION
It was therefore ‘no accident’ that the derivatives explosion took off from 2006 onwards, leading straight to the brick wall encountered in September 2008; and among entities heavily involved in these CDO excesses were Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc./Fidelity Deposit & Discount Bank and Penn Acceptance Corporation, which expanded on a scale which could not possibly have occurred had they been involved exclusively in legitimate business.

On 11th December 1984, Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., founded and registered Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of State Corporations authorities. The firm is registered as Business Corporation Entity #844244 in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and its Principal Office Address is shown as 1157 West Seventh Street, Erie, PA 16502. The sole Officer of the Company has been Michael C. Cottrell, President and Secretary.

For the record, the Editor of this service holds paper copies of printouts confirming the foregoing outline information concerning Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., from the Pennsylvania Department of State Corporations authorities’ Microfilm Number 8475 [Start: 905; End: 907] dated: 6th April 2005; 1st October 2006; 27th March 2008; 15th May 2008; 22nd December 2008; and 9th May 2009.

THE COLLECTIVE OF CRIMINAL AMERICAN PRESIDENTS
You will recall that we have reported that the Collective of Five Criminal Presidents of the United States – Carter (39), Bush Sr. (41), Clinton (42), Bush Jr. (43) and Obama (44) – DEMANDED immunity from prosecution from the World Court around last September, and were granted such immunity in a scandalous departure by the World Court, given that in seeking immunity these Presidents were self-acknowledging their need for immunity from prosecution and therefore openly confirming that they themselves recognise that they are criminal operatives.

[A statement by an anonymous, and therefore non-credible, Internet source on 11th March, citing unprovenanced and unprovable so-called intelligence sources that this is not true, is false].

You may also have noted that we doubt whether the World Court’s outrageous grant of immunity – conveying the impression that the World Court considers that its responsibility may be to protect high-level criminals from prosecution – protects the Collective of Presidents in the United States itself: it is applicable to the financial crimes that have been committed in Britain and Europe.

These reminders are inserted here in order to re-emphasise that President Obama and the other four Presidents ‘work together’ as a criminal Collective: so the sudden appearance of President Obama in Pennsylvania on or before 8th March 2010, related to THIS enquiry, will most certainly have reflected an operation known to or masterminded by George H.W. Bush Senior and President Obama’s Italian and other Chicago Mafiosi associates, with the full knowledge and connivance of senior CIA operative Mrs Hillary Clinton and her CIA husband, former President Bill Rockefeller.

MR COTTRELL CHECKS HIS CORPORATION’S STATE SCREEN
Now, if you’d like to pour yourself a stiff glass of whisky, we’ll divulge the purpose of this report.

On 8th March 2010, the Editor’s birthday as it happened, Mr Michael C. Cottrell performed a routine check of the Business Entity Filing for Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

He discovered that ALL OF A SUDDEN, the following additional entry had appeared on the filing for Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. (of which of course the Editor holds multiple copies, pulled both in Pennsylvania and in the United Kingdom):

Officers:
Name: MICHAEL C. COTTRELL
Title: President
Address: 1157 W 7th Street, ERIE PA 16502-25

Name: SALVATORE R DEFRANCESCO
Title: Secretary
Address: [Address not available].

• SELF-EVIDENT FACT:
At no time since the commencement of the solar system did Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., at a Meeting of the Board of his corporation, appoint SALVATORE R DEFRANCESCO or anyone else to serve as Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. No such filing was ever submitted to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of State Corporations Registration authorities.

OBJECTIVE: TO STEAL THE IMMINENT PAYOUTS
VIA THE ‘ITALIAN’ IMPOSTOR AS ‘SECRETARY’
Michael Cottrell reacted, as did the Editor of this service, Mr A. Clifton Hodges, Attorney for the CMKM/CMKX victims of the colossal Securities and Exchange Commission PHANTOM SHARES fraud, and others informed of this intrusion, with justified fury and outrage.

MR COTTRELL PHONES THE PA DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Michael Cottrell began by telephoning a Ms. Butler, Supervisor, Pennsylvania Department of State between approximately 9:34 a.m. EST and 9:40 a.m. EST, informing her inter alia as follows:

• Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. is to receive funds amounting to $15 billion derived from a ‘Settlement’ between the United States of America, the World Court, the People’s Republic of China, with the signed approval of President Barack Obama; and:

• A loan worth $6.2 trillion from the British Monarchical Power for the purpose of funding a Private Refunding of the United States Dollar.

• Pennsylvania Investments Inc., and Michael C. Cottrell himself, will pay a sum in connection with Pennsylvania Corporate and Personal Taxes of $495 million arising from this ‘Settlement’ process.

• The Pennsylvania Department of State has become a participant, whether knowing or unknowing, in the perpetration of ongoing fraudulent attempts to DIVERT the foregoing funds and to subvert the payment of the foregoing PA State taxes, with the assistance of banking sector and political fraudsters located in London, Paris, Geneva, Houston, Dallas and Washington DC, and in various locations in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

• This fraudulent attempt to divert the funds due to Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. is evidenced by the placement of ‘SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO as SECRETARY’ AS AN OFFICER (SECRETARY) OF Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. #844244 per the Pennsylvania Department of State corporations authorities’ screen dated 8th and 9th March 2010, without the knowledge or approval of the owners and Board of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. and without the necessary Amendment of Articles.

• Michael Cottrell DEMANDED the IMMEDIATE removal of the name ‘Salvatore R. Defrancesco’ as Secretary from the screen identifying entry for Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. corporation #844244.

• Mr Cottrell also DEMANDED an investigation and a FULL REPORT TO THE BOARD of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. corporation #844244 divulging WHO gave the authority for this intrusive name to be placed on the screen, what evidence existed of any authorization granting this individual the position of SECRETARY of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. corporation #844244, and what action will be taken against the individual committing the fraudulent entry.

• Mr Cottrell then stated that if the offending intrusion was not removed IMMEDIATELY upon the receipt by facsimile of his letter and accompanying documentation [amounting in all to 39 pages], Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. corporation Number 844244 will move legally for fraud against the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pedro A. Cortes and others, against this Salvatore R DeFrancesco individually and severally, referencing a fraud against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. corporation #844244 for THREE TIMES DAMAGES, namely $45 billion:

… since the payment is IMMINENT and therefore the screen can be used to divert or steal the aforementioned funds to Fidelity Deposit & Discount Bank et al., and/or Penn Acceptance Corporation, et al.

• Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. corporation #844244 has no accounts with either. The funds are to be deposited with Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.’s identified securities account at Morgan Stanley & Co., New York, NY.

• Summary to date:
This represented a bold, brazen attempt to divert the $15.0 billion and the sovereign $6.2 trillion loan funds earmarked for the funding of the private sector Dollar Refunding Programme payable to Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., in accordance with international mandated authority, by using a fraudulent imposed ‘Italian community’ representative as SECRETARY, who would be in a position to issue instructions to the paymaster to DIVERT AND STEAL THE LOAN FUNDS for payment into accounts controlled by the unauthorised intruder posing as SECRETARY of Mr Cottrell’s firm.

MONUMENTAL BLUNDER BY THE WHITE HOUSE CROOKS AND THEIR ASSOCIATES
It also represented a MONUMENTAL BLUNDER by the criminal operatives concerned, starting with President Barack Hussein Obama – who, we have been AUTHORITATIVELY AND EMPHATICALLY INFORMED, presided over and condoned, or facilitated, this INTENDED BUT ABORTED THEFT, on behalf of the Collective of Criminal Presidents of which he is currently the de facto Chairman.

As you can well imagine, following the faxing of these documents to the named recipients, and the realisation in high places on both sides of the Atlantic that the Editor of this service had acquired copies of the documents in question, turmoil broke out in the relevant offices and corridors of corrupt power in Washington DC, London and elsewhere.

• THE CROOKS AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL HAD BEEN CAUGHT RED-HANDED TRYING, ONCE AGAIN, TO DIVERT/STEAL THE SOVEREIGN LOAN FUNDS INTENDED FOR DOLLAR REFUNDING.

THE IMMEDIATE PREDECESSOR DECEPTION THAT WE ALSO ABORTED
As you will recall, an earlier, more feeble operation had erupted, centred on a crude attempt to rewrite Mr Wanta’s legend, inter alia to purport to represent that he ‘worked for’ the Federal Reserve – which would have had tangible consequences facilitating’ diversion of the funds – contrary to the language of the Writ for a Petition of Mandamus and the Motion to Dismiss filed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, both of which were the subject of a hearing at the United States Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria, attended by Michael C. Cottrell, Dana V. Wilcox, the Editor of this service, and Mr Wanta.

Any variation of Wanta’s legend would have undermined the language of the Petition, leaving him vulnerable to a charge of perjury: hence, when we republished the text of the Petition which it had been anticipated that everyone would have forgotten all about, that operation had to be aborted. Moreover parties involved in promulgating the lies in question had to cease and desist, as well.

So the criminal minds set immediately about reviving a dormant mechanism for stealing the funds (as they have been doing ever since our lives were turned upside down as a consequence of their serial criminality): and they came up with the Pennsylvania Fraud, built on preparations for the theft initiated seven years earlier – the most brazen attempt to steal the funds yet recorded.

INDICATIONS OF RECKLESS, RUSHED IMPLEMENTATION
The Pennsylvania Fraud has all the hallmarks of of crass. amateurish, brash risk-taking, and having been implemented (though not contrived: see below) in an extreme hurry.

The risks they took included the following elements:

• That Mr Cottrell would not check the Pennsylvania authorities’ corporate screen until after the thefts had been perpetrated, when it would, they will have assumed, have been ‘too late’.

• That the designated Paymaster would willingly participate in the diversion/theft.

• That ‘Salvatore R. DeFrancesco’ would be exposed and his connections with the Collective of Criminal Presidents and dubious financial institutions and linkages would be revealed.

• That, untypically, this Editor would not become aware of this monumental attempt to re-steal The Queen’s loan funds and the funds payable to Michael Cottrell’s corporation (related to the earlier stealing by George H. W. Bush of the Deutsche Bank AG contract and the electronic ‘stealing’ of his signature, for the private enrichment of George H. W. Bush, Mikhail Gorbachev, Helmut Kohl and Dr Joseph Ackermann as partners in Deutsche AG, St. Gallen, Switzerland) – until it was far too late.

ROUTINE EMBEDDING OF A STATE BUREAUCRACY
WHEN STRUCTURING SUCH A PLANNED GIGA-CRIME
And why did they imagine it was ‘safe’ to take such risks, implicating President Obama directly?

The answer to this question is interesting. It conforms to a standard pattern. This revolves around a STATE (never a FEDERAL: always a STATE) bureaucracy. The fraud is committed with the de facto assistance of the selected bureaucracy in question.

The function of the STATE bureaucratic element built into the operation is to provide the ‘fall-back’ pretext for the attempted theft – which is always the same, namely that the modern equivalent of ‘a clerical error’ had occurred. This ‘explanation’ surfaces when the operation has had to be aborted, as in this instance [see below]. It serves as a means of BLOCKING FURTHER ENQUIRIES, so that the sting is supposedly taken out of the outrage and everything subsides back to ‘normalcy’.

The only problem this time round is that the operation was identified, exposed, ‘stamped on’ and aborted in ‘real time’ – with the full details being made available to the Editor of this service, so that we can publicise the rotten stench of the head of the fish sitting in the White House.

In this instance, a mole inside the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s official structures would have procured the clandestine insertion of a Mafioso’s name as Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. corporation #844244.

COMPARISON WITH THE STEALING OF TAX REVENUES IN WISCONSIN
We have observed and deconstructed similar corruption within the State structures in Wisconsin: see, for instance, our report dated 6th August 2007, giving comprehensive forensic details of the triplication of the same State tax, the massive cover-up that ensued, and the failure of authorities to address this corruption. Another dimension of ongoing fraudulent practice within the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue can be summarised as follows (we have documents proving this):

• As a WI State resident you receive a State tax demand, requesting tax to be paid to the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue at a box number address.

• You send the funds demanded by the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue to the post office box address printed on the tax demand.

• After a period of time you receive an agitated DEMAND from the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue for the SAME TAX, with a request that it must be paid immediately to the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue’s designated street address.

• You protest that you have already paid the tax and that you have no intention of paying it twice.

• Wisconsin State Department of Revenue then triggers its dunning procedure, charging interest on the tax you have already paid, threatening court action culminating in the sequestration of your assets to the value of the unpaid tax, and a possible jail sentence.

• You send proof of payment (the money sent to the P.O. Box) by registered recorded delivery.

• The Wisconsin State Department of Revenue reiterates that so far as it is concerned, it never received the funds. You protest that they passed through your bank statement and provide them with a copy of the bank statement in question. They continue to deny they ever received the money.

• You inform lawyers, officers under the United States under the Misprision of Felony Statute, etc. of the travesty and injustice, but nothing happens: because all involved are working this together, being masons and members of secret societies catering for their own sordid interests – but mainly because the Jewish mafia controls the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue. Undsoweiter.

In the case of the Pennsylvania Fraud, we have prima facie evidence of criminal behaviour inside the State structures. Why should Pennsylvania be any different from the State of Wisconsin?

• Here’s what happened next.

WHAT HAPPENED AFTER THE ‘ITALIAN SECRETARY’ WAS DISCOVERED
As indicated, Mr Cottrell faxed his letter and associated documents to the named recipients on 9th March 2010. The main documents faxed to the Pennsylvania Department of State and to the named recipients are reproduced verbatim below, following this narrative.

Nothing happened on 9th March; and by the morning of 10th March, Salvatore R. DeFrancesco remained on the State authorities’ official screen, falsely logged as SECRETARY of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. So on 10th March, between 8:41 a.m. and 8:46 a.m., Michael Cottrell telephoned the Pennsylvania Department of State to ask why the necessary action to remove the imposter’s name had not been taken, as demanded in his letter to Ms. Butler, Supervisor, in that department.

Mr Cottrell was informed that Ms. Butler was ‘not in the office’. He was then placed ‘on hold’. When the woman returned to the phone, he was told that ‘we will not be taking any action at this time’. Mr Cottrell also contacted Martha Brown, General Counsel for the Pennsylvania Department of State.

CHINESE CONFIRM THAT ‘BUSH SENIOR’ IS STILL INTERFERING
On 10th March, we received authoritative intelligence from a Chinese official, sourced curiously from Hawaii, who had stated that ‘there are still problems with George Bush Sr’. This was a clear reference to the fact that the Chinese authorities knew that Bush Sr. stood behind the attempt to steal/divert the funds from Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. on 9th March – which was the (latest) date when the payouts should have taken place.

SUDDEN PHONE CALL FROM THE PA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
At 11.11 am Ms. Julie A. Castillo (717-705 6087), from the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue, not the Department of State, suddenly telephoned Mr Cottrell. She had ‘done some research’ and had discovered that Mr Cottrell had transposed ‘the last four digits of his [Mr Cottrell’s] own Social Security Number on a 2004 tax return, and that these last four digits corresponded to the last four digits of the Social Security Number belonging to Mr Salvatore R. DeFrancesco’. Quote unquote.

Provided you have not consumed too much whisky already, you will immediately understand that this ‘explanation’, apart from being nonsensical, was spurious and fabricated. Even if digits of a Social Security Number had been mixed up six years ago, that did not give anyone authority to assume the rôle of Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. at any time, let alone, out of the blue, six years later, when the payments were imminent. Nice try, but manifestly irrelevant.

Further, even if this were true, it would not explain why all subsequent Cottrell tax documents after 2004 (2005) had not reflected this error.

And further still, if there was any connection whatsoever between this lame ‘explanation’ and the sudden appearance of this member of ‘the Italian community’ on the Pennsylvania Department of State’s screen for Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., why had Salvatore R. DeFrancesco not appeared on the screen from 2004 onwards?

COTTRELL DEMANDS FAXED COPIES OF PA’S TAX RECORDS
Mr Cottrell requested that Ms. Julie Castillo fax the Pennsylvania Tax authorities’ relevant Cottrell tax documentation from 2003-2004 to date, to him on his office facsimile Erie, PA. [814-453 4453], to enable him to verify the accuracy of the ‘explanation’ that she had just put forward.

Ms. Castillo said she would comply. She also said that she would need to give an instruction to the Pennsylvania Department of State, for the (intrusive, false) ‘SECRETARY’ to be removed from the screen. This telephone call terminated at 11:17 a.m..

At 11:26 a.m. on 10th March, Ms. Castillo rang Mr Cottrell back to say that she had ‘spoken to my supervisor’ who had stated that Ms. Castillo was not permitted to fax the documents in question, but that she would instead put them in the mail.

At 12:06p p.m. EST on 10th March the name of the ‘Italian’ imposter, a known associate of George Bush Sr., was still on the PA Department of State’s screen for Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

MAFIOSO REMOVED FROM COTTRELL’S CORPORATE SCREEN
By 2:02pm on Wednesday 10th March, the screen had been amended to delete the name of the deliberately inserted Bush-Obama ‘Italian community’ impostor, so that it now read as follows:

Business Entity Filing History
Date: 3/10/2010
Name: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.
Entity Number: 844244
Status: Active
Entity Creation Date: 12/11/1984
State of Business: PA
Registered Office Address: 1167 West Seventh Street, Erie, PA 16502-0, Erie
Officers:
Name: Michael C. Cottrell
Title: President
Address: 1157 W 7th Street Erie, PA, 16502-25

FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF THE DOCUMENTS MAILED BY MS. CASTILLO
In the early evening UK time on Saturday 13th March 2010, the Editor was informed that Ms. Julie A. Castillo had sent certain Cottrell corporate tax documents to Michael Cottrell, copies of which were faxed shortly afterwards to the Editor of this service. Specifically, we received PA Corporate Tax Reports for the years 2004, 2006 and 2007. Here’s what we found on examining these documents:

• PA Corporate Tax Report 2004: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.
(1): The last four digits of Mr Cottrell’s Social Security Number are shown as: 8024,
which is NOT CORRECT. The first two digits of the last four digits should read: 08
(2) Michael Cottrell is listed as: President of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. CORRECT
(3) Michael Cottrell is listed as: Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. CORRECT
The document is signed by Michael C. Cottrell and his signature is correct.

• PA Corporate Tax Report 2006: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.
(1): The last four digits of Mr Cottrell’ Social Security Number are shown as: 0824, which is CORRECT. That is to say, TWO digits, not FOUR digits, were transposed in the 2004 Tax Report. [Mr Cottrell advises separately that the incorrect transposition of the first two of the last four digits to 8024 also appeared on the corporate tax reports for 2003 and 2005].
(2) Michael Cottrell is listed as: President/Managing Partner of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.
(3) Michael Cottrell is NOT listed as: Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., contrary to the CORRECT information sustained on the PA Corporate Tax reports for 2003, 2004 and 2005. As shown separately [because of a certain complexity] below, for a number of years, Pennsylvania authorities REMOVED ALL MENTION OF MR COTTRELL AND HIS CORPORATE TITLES from the screen, as part of the intended fraud. The document is signed by Michael C. Cottrell and his signature is correct.

• PA Corporate Tax Report 2007: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.
(1): The last four digits of Mr Cottrell’ Social Security Number are shown as: 0824, which is CORRECT. That is to say, TWO digits, not FOUR digits, were transposed in the 2004 Tax Report. [Mr Cottrell advises separately that the incorrect transposition of the first two of the last four digits to 8024 also appeared on the corporate tax reports for 2003 and 2005].
(2) Michael Cottrell is listed as: President/Managing Partner of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.
(3) Michael Cottrell is NOT listed as: Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., contrary to the CORRECT information sustained on the PA Corporate Tax reports for 2003, 2004 and 2005. As shown separately [because of a certain complexity] below, for a number of years, Pennsylvania authorities REMOVED ALL MENTION OF MR COTTRELL AND HIS CORPORATE TITLES from the screen, as part of the intended fraud. The document is signed by Michael C. Cottrell and his signature is correct.

STARTLING FINDINGS FROM OUR FORENSIC EXAMINATION
OF PA CORPORATE SCREEN DOCUMENTS
In the segment below divulging details of the letter and documents faxed and mailed by Mr Cottrell on 9th March 2010 to the Governor of Pennsylvania and the other named recipients, you will see under EXHIBIT “D” [Items D-01 to D-13], a list of screen documents displayed by the Pennsylvania Department of State to show the status of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

In addition to the findings exposed elsewhere in this report [e.g., above], we append immediately below each listing, a statement of what selected screen documents from the ‘EXHIBIT “D”’ list do OR DO NOT show – from which REITERATED INCONSISTENCIES we conclude that the Pennsylvania Department of State fiddled illegally with the screen displays for Mr Cottrell’s firm for many years, playing around with and varying what was displayed – despite the fact that no variations (Articles of Amendment) referencing changes in officers of the corporation had been filed. [Non-US readers: the US date format has to be displayed here to conform with standard US usage]:

D-01: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/9/2010 [falsely] identifying SALVATORE R DEFRANCESCO as SECRETARY of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. This imposter from the ‘Italian community’ appeared suddenly from ‘nowhere’.

• This represents AN ILLEGAL ACT by the Pennsylvania Department of State perpetrated against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. The ‘explanation’ proferred by the PA Department of Revenue is spurious, insolent, diversionary, reckless, irrelevant and an insult to our intelligence.

D-02: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/9/2010 indicating that NO AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES WAS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPT. OF STATE AUTHORIZING CHANGE OF OFFICERS since 12/11/1984.

D-03: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 5/9/2009, showing MICHAEL C. COTTRELL as PRESIDENT of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

D-04: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/9/2009, showing that as of the search time 09:44 on that date no variations (Articles of Amendment) referencing changes in officers of the corporation had been filed.

D-05: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 12/22/2008, showing MICHAEL C. COTTRELL as PRESIDENT of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. Since [see below] Mr Cottrell had been ARBITRARILY REMOVED AS PRESIDENT from the screen in earlier years [see below], the sudden ‘rehabilitation’ of Michael C. Cottrell as President of his own corporation by the Pennsylvania Department of State in December 2008 must surely have reflected some development which had compelled the corrupt PA officials concerned to REVERSE their previous illegal elimination [see below] of Mr Cottrell as President of his own corporation.

That event was the submission of an Affidavit by Michael Cottrell to Her Majesty the Queen via the Editor of this service in September 2008. Moreover it was then known, from telephone intercepts, that Michael Cottrell would be forwarding a further document [the Notarised Affirmation, shown as EXHIBIT “B”, included within the 39-page document faxed and mailed on 9th March 2010 to the Governor of Pennsylvania et al. and therefore appended (as ‘EXHIBIT “B”) below].

• This document was duly placed in the hands of the Editor of this service for forwarding to Buckingham Palace, as indicated.

D-06: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 12/18/2008 Uniform Commercial Code (UCC): This states that: Search Results Include Filings Through 12/18/2008 12:00 a.m., to which is appended the rubric: ‘There are currently no financing statements or other liens for the above requested criteria’.

D-07: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 12/22/2008, showing that as on that date no variations (Articles of Amendment) referencing changes in officers of the corporation had been filed.

D-08: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 5/15/2008. The necessary designation of Michael C. Cottrell as President and Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., applicable since the corporation’s formation on 11th December 1984, has been REMOVED. This represents AN ILLEGAL ACT by the Pennsylvania Department of State perpetrated against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

D-09: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 5/15/2008, showing that as on that date no variations (Articles of Amendment) referencing changes in officers of the corporation had been filed.

D-10: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/27/2008. The necessary designation of Michael C. Cottrell as President and Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., applicable since the corporation’s formation on 11th December 1984, has been REMOVED. This represents AN ILLEGAL ACT by the Pennsylvania Department of State perpetrated against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

D-11: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/27/2008, showing that as on that date no variations (Articles of Amendment) referencing changes in officers of the corporation had been filed.

D-12: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 10/1/2006. The necessary designation of Michael C. Cottrell as President and Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., applicable since the corporation’s formation on 11th December 1984, has been REMOVED. This represents AN ILLEGAL ACT by the Pennsylvania Department of State perpetrated against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc..

D-13: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 4/6/2005. The necessary designation of Michael C. Cottrell as President and Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., applicable since the corporation’s formation on 11th December 1984, has been REMOVED. This represents AN ILLEGAL ACT by the Pennsylvania Department of State perpetrated against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

• CONCLUSION FROM THE FOREGOING: The forensic evidence presented above (copies of which documents are held on file by the Editor of this service) shows that the original plan was simply to ‘delete’ Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., altogether, and to use his corporate vehicle, Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., as the shell for the purpose of stealing the $6.2 trillion sovereign funds (with its securities account with Morgan Stanley & Co., New York, NY).

The reason for this must clearly have been that it had been confirmed already by the international authorities concerned that Mr Cottrell was to be granted the privilege, given his trustworthiness and unique securities expertise, of organising and implementing the private sector fully taxable, transparent Refunding of the US Dollar.

INTENTION TO USE COTTRELL’S INVESTMENT CORPORATION
TO STEAL THE $6.2 TRILLION TRACEABLE BACK TO THE FALL OF 2007
At least that’s what appears at first sight. But on yet further investigation, it is recalled that while Michael Cottrell and Leo Wanta were staying in the Staten Island hotel (part of the ‘40 days in the hotel wilderness’) in November 2007, prior to Wanta’s ‘switch’ precipitated by what follows here, Wanta was incessantly arguing with Mr Cottrell about the necessity of equipping Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. with a BANK account with Citibank.

Mr Cottrell argued that he would never agree to using anything other than a SECURITIES ACCOUNT (i.e. the account of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., with Morgan Stanley in New York).

[Mr Wanta was only able to travel outside Wisconsin at all because the Editor’s since stolen loan of $35,000 to him, had procured the shortening of Wanta’s probation by five years and two weeks – to 14th November 2005, rather than 28th November 2010].

In other words, while purporting to be rooting for payment into his AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., what Wanta was actually seeking to procure while in the prolonged presence of Mr Cottrell in October-November 2007 [see our contemporary reports] was that Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. would acquire a BANK ACCOUNT from which The Queen’s sovereign $6.2 trillion loan, made available via the Bank of England to Bank of New York Mellon on 19th-20th June 2007, could be stolen as it was being paid to Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., in accordance with the international instructions.

• BECAUSE THEY COULD NOT HOPE TO STEAL THE $6.2 TRILLION
FROM PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS INC.’S SECURITIES ACCOUNT.

• As repeatedly stated in these reports, a US Securities Account is infinitely more secure than a bank account. It would be VERY DIFFICULT to steal/divert money from a US securities account.

Recall that Wanta works for Bush Sr. and was the courier between Bush Senior and Gorbachëv. Wanta’s job all along has been TO FACILITATE THEFTS BY BUSH SENIOR.

• THEREFORE, AMERITRUST GROUPE, INC. WAS A TYPICAL C.I.A.
‘BLIND’ DECEPTION [SET UP VIA LEVITTE: FRANCE/DVD]
All the time that Cottrell and Story were involved with Wanta, the cover story was that funds sent over by the People’s Bank of China in May 2006 were to be paid into AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., for the benefit of Wanta, who, as well as ‘working for’ Bush Senior, was also, all along, being used and deceived by him, and by Cheney and Bush Junior and their associates.

Wanta would leave the Staten Island hotel accommodation and go down to the public telephone booths in the hotel lobby to make calls to Mr Cheney and other operatives, to obtain his updated instructions, and to give progress reports on whether he was succeeding in getting Mr Cottrell to go along with the idea that Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., should acquire a bank account. It now transpires that this was all an elaborate cover masking the following circumstances:

• Ex-Treasury Secretary John Snow, considered by Bush Jr. to be ‘insufficiently malleable’, had to be ‘caused to resign’, in order to be replaced by Bush’s selected operative, Henry M. Paulson. The $4.5 trillion was then duly hijacked as intended (by the Bush Crime Family), by this Bush lackey, as Treasury Secretary, for use as footings for ILLEGAL securitisation operations (leveraged trading and hypothecation), thus specifically precipitating the vast EXPLOSION of derivatives in 2006-08, leading to the sudden bursting of the resulting global derivatives bubble and to the COLLAPSE following the intervention by the Editor of this service to the highest UK level – whereupon the sovereign monies were placed into ‘lockdown’ (out of access) almost immediately (on 10th-12th September 2008), unravelling exposed Bush-related Ponzi ops. (Madoff, Stanford et al).

• A year earlier, given that the $4.5 trillion had been ‘accounted for’, Wanta’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus [June 2007] asking for the $4.5 trillion to be paid to AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. turns out to have been an elaborate ruse, as was made obvious when Wanta appeared before the United States Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria, on 19th October 2007, and deliberately made a complete jackass of himself from the podium. Judge Ellis accordingly pronounced in favour of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond’s Motion to Dismiss. The Editor was present in the Court and witnessed this fabricated theatrical scene at first hand.

• While ostensibly nevertheless subsequently waiting in the Staten Island hotel for the AmeriTrust Groupe Inc. payment to be made by Citibank in November 2007, Mr Wanta had in fact been tasked by Bush/Cheney to keep waffling about AmeriTrust Groupe while all the while pressurising Michael Cottrell to attach a bank account to his Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. corporation (which was to conduct financial transactions with AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.). If that operation had succeeded, the intention would have been to use Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. as the shell with a bank account and an illegally imposed Secretary or Board of Directors, for the purpose of effecting the diversion of the payment of the $6.2 trillion US Dollar Refunding loan funds stipulated by the international authorities for Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., without Mr Cottrell’s knowledge or consent.

• By correctly refusing to agree to Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. acquiring a BANK account, Mr Cottrell FRUSTRATED THIS CRIMINAL INTENT, precipitating:

(1): Wanta’s ‘switch’ operation, starting with his intimation to Mr Cottrell that ‘we must get rid of Christopher Story but don’t tell him’, and culminating in Mr Wanta’s cack-handed, irregular and vituperative (without a cause) ‘dismissal’ of Michael Cottrell in March 2008 from the positions of Treasury and Executive Vice President of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. (received by Michael Cottrell with undisguised relief); and:

(2): The continued blocking of the Settlements because the White House et al. criminals had no intention of effecting the Settlements payments unless they could steal the bulk of them (especially the $6.2 trillion sovereign loan from the Queen for the Refunding of the US Dollar) for themselves.

FRUSTRATION BY MR COTTRELL AND THIS SERVICE of the further attempt to seize the $6.2 trillion sovereign loan fund on 8th-10th March 2010 has meant that the White House et al. have been UNABLE TO STEAL THE QUEEN’S LOAN FUNDS YET AGAIN; so they are currently trying to work out what deception they can mount next, to achieve that same constantly frustrated objective.

In other words, the Bush Crime Syndicate + CIA/DVD + the Collective of Criminal Presidents + the corrupt US Treasury under Geithner + the corrupt US State Department under Mrs Clinton have just demonstrated once again that they remain hell-bent on STEALING THE $6.2 TRILLION, i.e. mobilising these sovereign loan funds for their own purposes.

• THEY HAVE BEEN BLOCKED AT EVERY TURN.

What remains to be seen is: WILL THEY BE BRAZEN ENOUGH, AFTER BEING CAUGHT
SO RED-HANDED, TO WORK OUT YET ANOTHER WAY OF ACHIEVING THEIR OBJECTIVE?

Given that they have botched the latest attempt to steal the funds so badly, and have left such a rich trail of clues confirming their criminal intentions, the logical answer to this question, would be: NO. They have blown it. But the German element among these criminals never knows when to stop, and when it has been defeated. Their arrogance knows no limitations, as you are aware.

So a sensible precaution would be to assume that these crooks, and their associates, will continue to duck and weave and fiddle around, hoping against hope that they can pull off the stealing of the $6.2 trillion without getting caught in the act – and in spite of the fact that WE HAVE REPEATEDLY CAUGHT AND EXPOSED THEM ‘IN FLAGRANTE’.

• WHEREUPON U.S. LAW ENFORCEMENT, PAYMASTERS ETC, DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO BRING THESE HIGHEST-LEVEL CRIMINALS TO JUSTICE. The fact that they hold or held high office does not place them above the law. Their continued perpetration of MASSIVE CRIMES insults the American people and all those around the world who are watching the US authorities’ lily-livered cowardice and brazen flouting of the Rule of Law in allowing these hideous criminals to continue operations, despite having been repeatedly caught either in the act or planning it.

Judging by the number of people who would have had to have known about the intended Pennsylvania Fraud, the word BRIBERY, or an illusory promise of same, springs to mind.

We understand that following the latest aborted theft attempt, the level of activity from the UK side has intensified: but of course those concerned never consult us at all.

• They just leave us ‘out there’ to stick our necks out for them, and to expose what’s going on.

INCOHERENT ‘EXPLANATION’ BY THE PA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Reverting now to the attempted giga-theft of 8-9 March 2010, as you will have gathered from the above, what Ms. Julie A. Castillo of the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue represented to Mr Cottrell by telephone between 11:11 a.m. and 11:17 a.m. on 10th March 2010 was as follows:

• She had been ‘doing some research’ (following the fireworks from the Governor’s Mansion and the other official recipients which had erupted on receipt of Mr Cottrell’s 39-page facsimiles on 9th March), and had ‘established’ that:

• ‘The last four digits of [Mr Cottrell’s] Social Security Number on a 2004 tax return’ have been transposed, ‘and that these last four digits corresponded to the last four digits of the Social Security Number belonging to Mr Salvatore R. DeFrancesco’.

• This ‘somehow’ explained why Salvatore R. DeFrancesco appeared as Secretary for Pennsylvania Investments, Inc, – except that it DIDN’T. THERE WAS NO CONNECTION. THAT WAS A LIE.

PREPARATIONS FOR THEFT PUT IN PLACE SEVEN YEARS AGO:
ASSUMPTION THAT THE PAYMASTER WOULD COOPERATE
Deeper forensic consideration yields the following findings:

(1): The PA Corporate Tax Reports for 2004, 2006 and 2007 faxed to the Editor of this service are PRINTED REPORTS with all the entries inserted via the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue’s computerized system: i.e., the entries to procure the print-outs were inserted BY THE STATE AUTHORITIES themselves, NOT BY MR COTTRELL.

• The authorities are responsible for inserting the data for their print-outs.

These printed documents are signed by Mr Cottrell, and it is true that he missed the transposition of the two first digits of his Social Security Number when he signed the PA Corporate Tax report 2004 (and 2003 and 2005): but THE ERROR WAS THE TAX DEPARTMENT’S ‘ERROR’, because the document was generated by the tax authorities themselves.

• Contrary, therefore, to a subsidiary assertion by Ms. Julie A. Castillo, the ‘error’ was originated by the Pennsylvania tax authorities, NOT by Mr Cottrell.

(2): Which implies RATHER CLEARLY that this little entrapment mechanism was planned at least seven years ago – that is to say, not long after the stealing of Mr Cottrell’s Deutsche Bank A.G. contract and the ‘electronic stealing’ of his signature exposed recently in these reports, with the ultimate proceeds of that theft and the hijacking of his transactions being credited to Deutsche AG. (formerly Barrington Investment Group), St Gallen, Switzerland, the partners of which are George H. W. Bush Sr., Mikhail Gorbachëv, Dr Helmut Kohl and Dr Joseph Ackermann.

• WE HAVE NO DOUBT THAT GEORGE BUSH SENIOR, GORBACHEV, KOHL
AND ACKERMANN WERE EXPECTING TO SPLIT THE QUEEN’S $6.2 TRILLION
BETWEEN THEM, VIA DEUTSCHE A.G.. THAT WAS THE INTENTION.

(3): This deduction appears to contradict our working assumption cited above that the insertion of our ‘Italian community’ non-friend, Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, was effected IN A HELLUVA RUSH in connection with/following or coincident with the visit of President Obama to Pennsylvania – given that we have been definitively informed that President Obama was behind this attempted theft (on behalf of the Collective of Criminal Presidents).

However we think that what happened was that this long-laid bureaucratic enmeshment trap, which had been dormant for seven years, was ACTIVATED IN A HURRY so as to ‘facilitate’ the immediate stealing and diversion of Mr Cottrell’s $11.0 billion and the $6.2 trillion sovereign loan funds, which were to have been deposited on 9th March 2010: and this assessment appears to be the conclusion of the Chinese authorities, as well.

(4): The transposition of two of the last four digits of Michael Cottrell’s Social Security Number IS OF COURSE COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT to the matter in hand, since it does not ‘AUTHORISE’ the surfacing of the impostor Salvatore R. DeFrancesco as SECRETARY of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. on the Pennsylvania Department of State’s screen for corporation ##844244.

(5): Therefore, the ‘explanation’ proffered by Ms. Julie A. Castillo [717-705 6087] is proven to be SPURIOUS, DISINGENUOUS, IMPERTINENT, OBFUSCATORY, DIVERSIONARY, AND IRRELEVANT.
The ‘explanation’ generated in extremis under pressure by Pennsylvania’s Department of Revenue DOES NOT ‘EXPLAIN’ the fraudulent appearance of a noted member of ‘the US Italian community’ as Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., immediately ahead of the large payouts in question.

(6): The criminal crudity of this dirty little pre-planned stratagem with colossal implications for the WHOLE WORLD is self-evident, not least since it begs the subsidiary question: if Madam Julie A. Castillo’s ‘explanation’, is pertinent, why did Salvatore R. DeFranceso not appear as Secretary on the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue’s successive PA Corporate Tax Reports print-outs for Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., back in 2004 (2003 and 2005)? Problem: In 2004, the Secretary of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. was shown as Michael Cottrell, so that ‘couldn’t happen’.

(7): SO: On subsequent PA Corporate Tax Reports for Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., Michael Cottrell’s name was REMOVED from the entry on the Department’s print-outs showing him as SECRETARY, in readiness for this diabolical criminal operation, see?

IN OTHER WORDS, THE EVIDENCE SHOWS THAT A CRIMINAL THEFT FROM PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC., on top of the theft of Mr Cottrell’s Deutsche Bank AG contract and the ‘electronic stealing’ of his signature, WAS PLANNED AS LONG AGO AS 2003-2005.

(8): There can be little doubt that if this outrageous criminal operation, masterminded in its most recent phase by the Obama White House, had not been spotted in time, the $15.0 billion and the $6.2 trillion sovereign loan funds WOULD HAVE BEEN DIVERTED/STOLEN, as was clearly intended – the underlying practical assumption being, no doubt, that this would have been achievable with the enthusiastic participation of the Paymaster, who would have been handsomely ‘paid off’ for his practical assistance in facilitating the stealing of The Queen’s loan funds by George Bush Senior, Mikhail Gorbachev, Helmut Kohl and the CEO of Deutsche Bank, Dr Joseph Ackermann.

• That’s how these people operate.

SUMMARY OF THE PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD
So this colossal aborted criminal operation represented a blatant, rushed, yet long preplanned, reckless, brazen attempt by the President of the United States, Barack Obama, in conjunction with the Collective of Criminal Presidents and their co-conspiring associates, of which Mr Obama is the de facto Chairman, to steal Mr Cottrell’s $11.0 billion and to re-steal the $6.2 trillion sovereign loan funds which the Basel instructions require to be paid into the Securities Account held with Morgan Stanley & Co, New York, NY, of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., for the sole purpose of financing the transparent, on-the-books, fully taxable US Dollar Refunding process, which remains the ONLY solution to the crisis and has long been approved by the Group of Seven financial powers.

We have further definitive official confirmation from our special sources, that this ‘is what the instructions say’. We also have information to the effect that since Mr A. Clifton Hodges’ letter to the Editor of this service which we were recently asked to forward to Buckingham Palace, there has been ‘heightened activity’ from London in this overall context.

What distinguishes this brazen attempted giga-theft from its multiple predecessors is that, given the much more intense scrutiny of the behaviour of these organised criminals holding the highest offices in the United States, the perpetrators were caught IN FLAGRANTE, in real-time.

In their greedy RUSH and lust to re-seize these funds illegally for their own gross purposes and self-enrichment, that ‘Italian’ character linked to Bush and Obama was intentionally and illegally inserted as ‘SECRETARY’ of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. immediately ahead of the relevant intended ‘Settlements’ payments, so that Salvatore R. DeFrancesco could instruct the Paymaster to divert the funds corruptly into bank accounts designated by the Collective of Criminal Presidents.

The operation had, as we have seen, all the hallmarks of having been devised under pressure and in a rush, albeit having been planned many years in advance in anticipation of such a contingency.

The payments were imminent, and there was not much that could continue to be done to block them: so emergency criminal measures needed to be taken to divert the funds at the point of remittance. Any problems arising from the theft could be ‘sorted out’ later.

We can see from the lame, concocted bureaucratic ‘clerical error’ explanation put forward in the phone call from Ms. Julie A. Castillo of the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue to Mr Cottrell between 11:11 a.m. and 11:17 a.m. on 10th March 2010 from 717-705 6087, that the bureaucratic back-stop had to be invoked in a terrible hurry – which was why Ms. Castillo came up hurriedly with such a completely disconnected and ludicrous insult to our intelligence with her unrelated invocation of ‘four’ Social Security digits allegedly mixed up back in 2004, which of course had nothing to do with the surfacing of Salvatore R. DeFrancesco as ‘Secretary’ of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

And what further emerges from this is that Ms. Castillo inadvertently ADMITTED that the criminal stratagem to steal funds that we have exposed had indeed been activated. This can be deduced from the fact of the disconnect between the ‘explanation’ and the fact of the member of the ‘Italian community’s’ appearance on the Pennsylvania Department of State’s screen. Because, as you will now readily concur, the very fact that THERE IS NO CONNECTION reveals precisely that THEY HAVE ADMITTED THE EXISTENCE OF THE CRIMINAL STRATEGY TO STEAL THE FUNDS.

• In other words, THEY BLURTED OUT THE ESSENCE OF THEIR CRIME.

Put another way, such a connection could ONLY be made by the criminal minds involved, given that there is no logical connection. So they have COMPOUNDED THEIR BLUNDER: they have actually confirmed the pinpoint accuracy of the conclusion from this forensic analysis.

• That, in turn, means that some or all of the recipients of Mr Cottrell’s faxes dated 9th March are CO-CONSPIRATORS in a colossal attempted fraudulent transaction the purpose of which was to STEAL THE FUNDS LOANED BY THE QUEEN PRO BONO PUBLICO IN ORDER TO FINANCE THE REFUNDING OF THE U.S. DOLLAR. And since we know that Mr Barack Obama and his White House precipitated this attempted hijacking operation, President Obama and his criminal cronies within and adjacent to the Beltway de facto ‘work for’ Bush, Gorbachev, Kohl and Ackermann.

For future reference, please take on board the criminal modus operandi explained above that is routinely used in the United States for such scamming operations: always to embed a STATE (NOT a Federal, but always a STATE) bureaucracy within the structured framework of the intended criminal giga-theft – for use as a ‘back-stop’ device, should the heist be exposed.

• That way, State officials, elected or career, always get the blame, and the whole operation disappears into a bureaucratic black hole hundreds of miles away from the Beltway.

Imagine how difficult it would have been to prove that the funds had been stolen, if this outrage had not been discovered in time to compel the criminals to abort their botched operation.

DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD

At about lunchtime UK time on 9th March 2010, the Editor’s fax machine delivered a large number of pages on Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. letterheading addressed to:

(1): Edward G. Rendell, Governor of Pennsylvania.
(2): Pedro A. Cortes, Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
(3): Tom Corbett, Attorney general of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
(4); Robert S. Cessar, United States Attorney, Pittsburgh, PA.
(5): A Clifton Hodges, Esq., Hodges and Associates, Pasadena, CA.
(6): Mr William Bonney, Sr., BOLDCAP.
(7): Mr Dana V. Wilcox.

Selected documents that were forwarded by fax and US mail by Mr Cottrell in the face of this criminal provocation were as follows:

……………………………………………………………………………….

(1): FAX COVER
PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814- 453 4453
Email: pii-mcc@msn.com

TO: Pennsylvania Department of State
401 North Street, Room 206
P.O. Box 8722
Harrisburg, PA 17105-8721

Attention: Ms. Butler, Supervisor

Via: Fax: 717-783 2244

ITEMS ENCLOSED:
(1): Letter of Notification regarding: Fraudulent Entry on www.corporatyions.state.pa.u./corp by person(s) unknown against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. [3/8.2010]: 3 Pages
(2): Exhibit “A”: 12 Pages
(3): Exhibit “B”: 5 Pages
(4): Exhibit “C”: 3 Pages
(5): Exhibit “D”: 15 Pages.

Number of pages including cover: 39
9 March 2010
……………………………………………………………………………….

(2): LETTER OF NOTIFICATION TO
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE:

PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814- 453 4453
Email: pii-mcc@msn.com

TO: Pennsylvania Department of State
401 North Street, Room 206
P.O. Box 8722
Harrisburg, PA 17105-8721

Attention: Ms. Butler, Supervisor

Reference:
Due Diligence Accounts Payable [Nov 19th, 2004 to March 25th, 2008]

RE: FRAUDULENT ENTRY ON www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp BY PERSON(S) unknown against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. (3/8/2010)

Via: Fax: 717-783 2244/ AND U.S. MAIL

Dear Ms. Butler:
Per our conversation this date, between approximately 9:34 a.m. EST and 9:40 a.m. EST, I stated to you that Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. is to receive funds in the amount of Fifteen Billion United States Dollars ($15,000,000,000.00 USD):

[Ref: Exhibit “B, Page 1” Payables Due with the Due Diligence Documentation Part 1 and Part 2, dated November 19, 2004 to March 23, 2008]

derived from a “Settlement” between the United States of America, the World Court, the People’s Republic of China, with the signed approval of President Barack Obama, and a loan of Six Point Two Trillion United States Dollars ($6,200,000,000,000.00 USD) to Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., via Her Majesty, the Queen of England (Sovereign of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) for the purpose of a Private Funding Refunding of the United States Dollar (Ref: Exhibit “B” Pages 2-4, an Affidavit submitted to Her Majesty, et al. On 29 December 2008).

Additionally, I stated to you that Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. (including Michael C. Cottrell) will pay an amount of Pennsylvania Corporate and Personal taxes of approximately Four Hundred and Ninety-Five Million United States Dollars ($495,000,000.00 USD) from this “Settlement” process.

Page 2: RE: FRAUDULENT ENTRY ON www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp BY PERSON(S) unknown against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. (3/8/2010):

However, the Pennsylvania Department of State has now become [a] knowing or unknowing participant in the ongoing fraudulent activities [being] attempted to divert said funds and the payment of Pennsylvania Corporate Taxes and/or to steal and place said funds in “off-balance sheet account(s)” with the aid of bank and political fraudsters – located in London (UK), Paris (France), Geneva (Switzerland), Houston and Dallas (Texas), Washington, D.C., and various locations in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

The above referenced fraudulent activity is evidenced by the placement of “SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO as SECRETARY” as Officer of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. screen dated March 8, 2010 WITHOUT a correspondent Amendment of Articles – WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE OR APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTORS/OWNERS OF PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.

Therefore, this corporation hereby demands that the name “SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO as SECRETARY” BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY FROM THE SCREEN PAGE IDENTIFYING ENTITY 844244: PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC., 1157 WEST 7TH STREET, ERIE PA 16502-0.

Further, this corporation demands an investigation and a FULL REPORT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS – as to who gave the authority for this name to be placed on said screen, what evidence [exists] of authorization granting said person the position of SECRETARY for this corporation, and what action will be taken against said person committing the fraudulent entry.

If the offending item is not removed immediately upon the facsimile receipt of this letter and documentation, this corporation will move legally for fraud against the Secretary of the Commonwealth, the Honorable Pedro A Cortes, et al., and against SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO (INDIVIDUALLY AND SEVERALLY) for Fraud against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., for THREE (3) TIMES DAMAGES, e.g., FORTY-FIVE BILLION UNITED STATES DOLLARS ($45,000,000,000.00 USD) – since the payment is IMMINENT and therefore the screen identified can be used to divert or steal the aforementioned funds, e.g. [for account of] FIDELITY DEPOSIT & DISCOUNT BANK, et al., and/or PENN ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, et al..

This firm has NO ACCOUNTS with either. The stated funds are to be deposited with this firm’s identified Securities Account at Morgan Stanley & Co, New York, NY.

Page 3: RE: FRAUDULENT ENTRY ON www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp BY PERSON(S) unknown against Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. (3/8/2010):

Thank you for your immediate attention and assistance in this matter.

Regards,

Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S.
President, CEO and Secretary
Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502-1106

Reference:
Exhibit “A”: Pages 1 thru 11;
Exhibit “B”: Pages 1 thru 4;
Exhibit “C”: Pages 1 and 2;
Exhibit “D”: Pages 1 thru 13.

CC:
(1): The Honorable Edward G. Rendell, Governor of Pennsylvania
(2): The Honorable Pedro A Cortes, Secretary of the Commonwealth
(3): The Honorable Tom Corbett, Pennsylvania Attorney General
(4): Robert S. Cessar, United States Attorney, Pittsburgh, PA
(5): A. Clifton Hodges, Esq., Hodges and Associates, 4 East Holly Street,
Suite 202, Pasadena, CA 91103
(6): Mr William Bonney, Sr., BOLDCAP
(7): Mr Dana V. Wilcox

……………………………………………………………………………….

(3): EXHIBIT “A”: WE REPRODUCE HEREWITH ONLY THE LIST OF ITEMS, LABELLED A-1 TO A-11 THAT ACCOMPANIED THE FOREGOING LETTER OF NOTIFICATION [BY FAX AND U.S. MAIL]. The Editor of this service holds copies of ALL these documents on file:

EXHIBIT “A”:

A-01: Contact Information; Pennsylvania Department of State.

A-02: Identification Screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/8/2010 [falsely] identifying SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESO as SECRETARY of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc..

A-03: Identification Screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/9/2010 indicating that NO AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES WAS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPT OF STATE AUTHORIZING CHANGE OF OFFICERS.

A-04: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. Articles of Incorporation ID # 8475-907.

A-05: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. Articles of Incorporation ID # 8475-906 identifying ALL DIRECTORS/OWNERS OF THE CORPORATION [Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.].

A-06: Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. Articles of Incorporation ID # 8475-905 identifying ENTITY NUMBER 844244 and the address of the corporation [Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.].

A-07: Oath of Publication Notice, The Erie Daily Times, dated 9 January 1985.

A-08: Google search for SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO dated 3/9/2010, page 1.

A-09: Google search for SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO dated 3/9/2010, page 2.

A-10: FORBES.COM screen identifying SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO, page 1.

A-11: FORBES.COM screen identifying SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO, page 2.
……………………………………………………………………………….

(4): EXHIBIT “B”: Pages B-1 thru 4:
Item:

AFFIDAVIT SUBMITTED TO HER MAJESTY, THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND [SOVEREIGN OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND] on 29 December 2008 via Mr Christopher Story, FRSA, 108 Horseferry Road, Westminster, London SW1P 2EF, United Kingdom:
[01144-02[0] 7222 3836 or 1-800-661-4809].

PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814- 453 4453
Email: pii-mcc@msn.com
29 DECEMBER 2008

I, Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., do hereby swear and affirm the following facts:

1: That on December 13, 2008 between approximately 4:47 pm EST and 4:52 p.m. EST, I placed a telephone call to Mr William Bonney, Sr., – during which he notified me of the following:

(a) My relationship with Delmarva Timber Trust, et al., has caused a legal concern that will prevent me from taking economic receipt of any funds regarding the Payables Due within the Due Diligence Documentation Part 1 and Part 2 (dated November 19, 2004) to March 23, 2008) presented to Mr Bonney on May 17, 2008, at Madison, Ohio;

[Reference: Delmarva Timber Trust [R.E.I.T.] – Owen C. Meddles, Dana V. Wilcox, Michael C. Cottrell, et al.: Allocation for Release of Blocked Funds License Application Submitted to the United States Department of Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control: Exhibits: COPY No. 004 – # 1-A, #1-B, #1-C, #1-D, #3, #5, #14, #15, #G-6, #G-4, #G-2, and #G-1].

(b) That my participation in the attempted recovery of said funds for and on behalf of Delmarva Timber Trust, et al., has caused President George W. Bush’s Administration discomfort sufficient to warrant Mr Bonney’s personal guarantee to arbitrate the “differences between the White House/Leo (Lee) E. Wanta, and Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S.”.

[Reference: Delmarva Timber Trust [R.E.I.T.] – Owen C. Meddles, Dana V. Wilcox, Mrs Cheryl D. (Meddles) Torres, Michael C. Cottrell, et al.: Letter and packet, dated January 15, 2002, delivered to: The Honorable Richard B. Cheney, Vice President of the United States, The White House/West Wing Executive Offices. Exhibits: COPY #0003: pp #1 of 3, #2 of 3, #3 of 3: Encl C; Encl E; Encl F].

(c) That ALL of my personal and corporate telephone calls are recorded and transcribed at Fort Meade (NSC), et al. and are submitted to the White House.

2: That on December 26, 2008, between approximately 7:31 a.m. EST and 7:34 a.m. EST, I placed a telephone call to Mr William Bonney, Sr., and was notified of the following items:

(a) That access to the “Settlement Funds” would commence on December 26th or serious consequences for the “Bush Administrations, et al.” will occur;

(b) That regarding Leo Wanta (Wanta Plan Funds), the “big guys” have determined that President G. W. Bush will fight to release the funds until after January 20, 2009, that the “big guys” have decided not to fight him for said reason before January 20th;

(c) That the “big guys” will wait until President Obama’s Economic Team presents the “Obama Plan” approximately on January 29, 2009;

(d) That the Obama Administration will “go with the G-7 Plan, but with ‘safeguards’, since ‘others’ do not have experience with such large funds”; and:

(e) That Mr Bonney has an agenda that must be accomplished first.

3: That Mr Dana V. Wilcox, as Financial Consultant, and Michael C. Cottrell, as Secretary and Trustee of Delmarva Timber trust [R.E.I.T.] physically delivered and paid for the recording of the Articles of Amendment to the Trust, therefore, reinstating the Delmarva Timber Trust as an Active Trust with Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation on March 28, 2001 at 10:57 a.m. EST.

4: That, during the 1980s and 1990s, until October 17, 1992, Col. Dana V. Wilcox (now retired: Richmond, Virginia, USA):

• As CEO of Errickson, Inc. and acting for and on behalf of Owen C. Meddles/Delmarva Timber Trust, et al..

• actively participated in the “last proper refunding of the US Dollar” with the cooperation and participation of:

• Col. Kok Howe Kwong, of the People’s Republic of China, via:

• Aneko Credit Pte Ltd, Singapore, Hong Kong and Austria.

5: That the aforementioned Private Funding Refunding Operation of the US Dollar was initiated by President Ronald W. Reagan, via the communiqué on August 17, 1982 and agreed upon as a result of President Reagan’s State Visit to the People’s Republic of China in April 1984.

6: That on September 12, 2006 between approximately 8:37 a.m. EST and 8:52 a.m. EST, Dr Dana V. Wilcox telephoned me and discussed the following items:

(a) That the abovementioned items combined with the current sub-prime/derivative debacle now requires a new Private Funding Refunding Operation for the US Dollar – without US Govt. funding;

(b) That the new refunding flow charts would resemble the flow charts Delmarva Timber Trust, et al., had developed under Mr Wilcox and Mr Cottrell’

(c) That said flow chart system identified joint venture projects between Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., and Delmarva Timber Trust, et al., to create new tax incentives and full tax payment to the US Government, et al., as part of the refunding process, and to fund numerous low-income housing, waste management, other infrastructure projects, administration auditing teams for the projects;

(d) That these flow charts and processes were the actual basis of the “Wanta Plan” activities, as presented to Mr Christopher Story FRSA by Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., March 15 and 16, 2006;

(d*) That Mr Wilcox agreed upon receipt of the G-7 Refunding Funds to Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. Securities Account at Morgan Stanley NYC, per the “Wanta/Group of-Seven Plan”, he would act as “Consultant at least’ for Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A.,, M.S., and Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.;

(e*) That the people identified within the proposed Obama Economic Team – i.e., Dr Ben Bernanke, Mr Robert Rubin, Mr Timothy Geithner, Mr Lawrence Summers, Mr Paul Volcker, and specifically Mr Rahm Emanuel (Wasserstein Perella & Co.) – may have been tainted, by the actions of previous Presidential Administrations since 1981, and, therefore, may require “safeguards” that ensure the demise or hinder the effectiveness of the “Private Funding Refunding Operation of the US Dollar”;

(f*) That Mr Wilcox and Mr Cottrell believe the release of the aforementioned funds would demand a transparent presidency and a country operating under the Rule of Law. Only a proper privately funded refunding with third party auditing – not the President’s Cabinet as the auditing party – will allow the US Dollar to regain its capitalization value and renew the world’s international trading markets with full disclosure and transparent regulation.

7: That in reference to the sworn Affidavit signed and dated September 5, 2008, and submitted via Mr Christopher Story FRSA:

• I have not received an answer back concerning the question posed to Mr Thomas J. Melville, Jr., or his contact ‘J.B.” at the US Treasury Compliance Department, New York;

8: Therefore, I respectfully request the World Court and HMQ allow the directed “G-7” nations to operate the refunding program via the “Wanta Plan” commitment with Pennsylvania Investments, Inc./Mr Dana V. Wilcox to be executed with the designated funds from the Six Point Two Trillion USD as a “loan” via the Bank of England, to the Bank of New York Mellon (19-20 June 2007) to Morgan Stanley Securities Account of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

A copy of this affirmation shall have the same effect and force as the original.

I, Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., President of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., located at 1157 West 7th Street, Erie, PA, 16502, United States Passport No. 205125335, do hereby swear and affirm that the above information is true and factual.

[Signed]
Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. Dare: 12-29-2008
President
Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814-453 4453

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
NOTARIAL SEAL
Raemarie T. Kovaly – Notary Public
CITY OF ERIE, ERIE COUNTY
My Commission expires Aug. 03, 2012
12-29-2008

* As original. Not amended by the editor here.
……………………………………………………………………………….

(5): EXHIBIT “C”: Pages C-1 thru 2:
Item: CORPORATE AND PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE OF
MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S.:

Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814-453 4453
Email: pii-mcc@msn.com

CORPORATE AND PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:

• DECEMBER 1984 TO PRESENT:
PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
PRESIDENT, CEO, TREASURER AND SECRETARY

Developed and executed marketing strategies to promote the sale of Investment Advisory Asset Allocation and Risk Analysis, Mutual Funds, and Cash Management services to Pension Plan Sponsors.

Marketed Investment Advisory Services and Mutual Funds to Pension Plans (Low to Mid Size: $10 million – $100 million) while training registered Representatives on the following techniques: cold calling approaches, sales presentation methods, and closes.

Marketed Investment Advisory Services and products to NYSE Broker/Dealers in a Twenty-Five (25) State Region.

Conducted advanced sales seminars for Registered Representatives: Development and acceptance of “market timing”, defined benefit/contribution plans; 501(k) plans; third party performance verification (SEI); marketing methods for fixed income and Pooled CIGs.

Developed, published, and marketed PENNSEARCH: RISK & ASSET ALLOCATION ANALYSIS: based on Sharpe’s Single-Index Beta Model and Morley Capital’s “Compass” program. Provided Investment Analysis/Advisory Services to Pension Plan Sponsors and TPAs

• JANUARY 1990 – TO MAY 1993:
NIAGARA SECURITIES, INC.
PRESIDENT and GENERAL SECURITIES PRINCIPAL

General Securities Broker/Dealer approved by N.A.S.D and S.E.C.
Securities Licensed Series 24, General Securities Principal.

Developed (with Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.) a Public/Private $55 Million – $60 Million AFFORDABLE HOUSING VENTURE CAPITAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP for housing the Homeless, mentally and/or physically challenged. Renewed and endorsed by the Pittsburgh Regional Office for the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Approved by Youngstown City Council (April 1990) for initial funding for WestWind Foundation.

• JANUARY 1983 TO JUNE 1984:
E. F. HUTTON and COMPANY, INC.
PENSION CONSULTANT/INSURANCE SPECIALIST

Promoted E.F. Hutton Universal Life Products and implemented training programs for the Account Executives to coordinate an effective program of capturing client assets.

• 1970 to 1976:
U.S. NAVY, ACTIVE DUTY, HONORABLY DISCHARGED:
AVIATION METEOROLOGY: FLEET WEATHER CENTRAL,
NAS NORFOLK, VA; USS AMERICA CVN-66

• LICENSING AND ACADEMIC BACKGROUND:
N.A.S.D. & S.E.C.:
SERIES 24, November 1987
SERIES 7, November 1983
SERIES 63, December 1983

ASSOCIATE MEMBER:
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (2003)

MERCYHURST COLLEGE:
Master of Science, 2002
Administration of Justice

National Criminal Justice Honor Society (April 2001)

PENN STATE UNIVERSITY:
Paralegal Certificate, 1998

PENN STATE UNIVERSITY:
B.A. Political Science, 1978

• PUBLISHED MATERIAL:
‘Elite Power and Capital Markets’:
Master of Science Thesis identifying a topology of deviant financial activities that include:
Political-Financial, Entity-Financial, and White-Collar (criminal) Financial Activities.

These activities illustrate political deviance evolution, involving: wealth, access, knowledge, obfuscation, and denial.

‘Pennsearch’:
A description of a portfolio/asset allocation and efficient frontier analysis system based on the client’s desired rate of return, the risk level, and various measurement standards used to evaluate the portfolio investment performance.

……………………………………………………………………………….

(6): EXHIBIT “D”: List of documents submitted with the Letter of Notification and related papers addressed to the Pennsylvania Department of State and sent by facsimile and US Mail on 9th March 2010. The documents listed here are not displayed, but the Editor holds paper copies of each of them on file. [Note: When ongoing work on our upgraded website is complete, we will be able to display such documents: but the Editor was unwilling to proceed with the revised website, which was meant to have been complete by January, without further modifications, which are in hand].

D-01: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/9/2010 [falsely] identifying SALVATORE R DEFRANCESCO as SECRETARY of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

D-02: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/9/2010 indication that NO AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES WAS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPT. OF STATE AUTHORIZING CHANGE OF OFFICERS.

D-03: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 5/9/2009.

D-04: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/9/2009.

D-05: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 12/18/2008.

D-06: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 12/22/2008

D-07: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 12/22/2008.

D-08: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 5/15/2008.

D-09: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 5/15/2008.

D-10: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/27/2008.

D-11: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/27/2008.

D-12: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 10/1/2006.

D-13: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 4/6/2005.

NOTE: ON REQUEST, THE EDITOR WILL FAX COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS LISTED BELOW, PROVING THE FRAUD, TO APPLICANTS WHO SEND US AN EMAIL REQUESTING THEM.

• Please press CONTACT US in the Red Box below, which sends the Editor an email. You MUST include your full coordinates, including of course your fax number. We will NOT oblige applicants for this add-on who withhold any detail of their coordinates (name, address, telephone number, proper identity: not a pseudonym, etc): if we discern that any detail in the coordinates does not ring true, we will not respond.

The documents that will be forwarded by fax are as follows:

THE PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD:
SPECIAL ADD-ON FAX: PAGE ONE:
D-01: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/9/2010 [falsely] identifying SALVATORE R DEFRANCESCO as SECRETARY of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. This member of the US ‘Italian community’ IS A CRIMINAL IMPOSTOR.

THE PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD:
SPECIAL ADD-ON FAX: PAGE TWO
D-02: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/9/2010 indicating that NO AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES HAD BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE DEPT. OF STATE AUTHORIZING CHANGE OF OFFICERS.

THE PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD:
SPECIAL ADD-ON FAX: PAGE THREE
D-03: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 5/9/2009, showing Michael C. Cottrell as President but OMITTING his earlier designation as SECRETARY, despite the fact that NO AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES HAD BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE DEPT. OF STATE AUTHORIZING CHANGE OF OFFICERS.

THE PENNSYLVANIA FRAUD:
SPECIAL ADD-ON FAX: PAGE FOUR
NEW: Identification screen www.corporations.state.pa.us/corp of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. dated 3/10.2010, taken at 2:02pm EST, showing that the impostor SALVATORE R. DEFRANCESCO as SECRETARY of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., had been removed from the screen.

(7) APPENDIX:
The following document was not included in the urgent fax sent by Mr Cottrell dated 9th March 2010 to the Pennsylvania Department of State but is included herewith for reference:

PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENTS, INC.
1157 West 7th Street
Erie, PA 16502
Telephone: 814-455 9218
Facsimile: 814- 453 4453
Email: pii-mcc@msn.com

16 NOVEMBER 2005

CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION OF CORPORATE RESOLUTION

I hereby certify that at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, held on the 16th day of November 2005 at which said meeting a quorum was present and acting throughout, the following resolutions were adopted and ever since have been and now are in full force and effect:

RESOLVED,
that US Dollar account(s) be established at Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated located at 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10020.

RESOLVED,
that Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., as President and Secretary, is hereby empowered with full legal authority to sign any necessary documents to open and conduct business within said account(s) on behalf of this Corporation;

FURTHER RESOLVED, that Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., is hereby granted authority to make, execute, and deliver, any and all written instructions necessary or proper to effectuate the authority hereby conferred to sign any and all necessary documents required to execute instructions regarding activities within said account(s).

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my signature for said corporation this 16th day of November, 2005.

[Signed]
Michael C. Cottrell
President and Secretary
Date: 11-16-2005

[Signed]
Diane R Bertolini-Cottrell, B.A., M.A.
Shareholder
Date: 11-16-2005.

• 20TH MARCH 2010: ANOTHER CAVALIER DIVERSIONARY ATTACK ON THE EDITOR
We understand that the notoriously cavalier CIA/FBI/DVD disinformation and fabrication operative, Thomas Heneghan, who specialises in diversionary agitation and propaganda rather than informing readers objectively, has published a further gratuitous attack on the Editor of this service, citing International Currency Review as his source. That’s odd, because the issue he cites doesn’t exist.

International Currency Review, Volume 35, Numbers 1 & 2 is on machine for the rest of March and so has not been published yet. It will be distributed worldwide in April 2010.

Since this notorious US agitprop operative cannot even be bothered to get his citations right, his prognostications and distortions retain as little credibility as the fake ‘Principality of Snake Hill’, Australia, which his client, Mr Wanta, is desperately perpetuating in order to sustain his creaking false credentials as ‘Ambassador’.

As this fake ‘Principality’ does not exist, no State Department or United Nations authentication of Wanta’s fraudulent Ambassadorship for the Principality of Snake Hill to the United States exists, either. On 20th September 2009 and in subsequent reports, we demonstrated before the whole world that ‘The Principality of Snake Hill’ is fraudulent. Therefore, Heneghan and Wanta must be suffering from an advanced form of mental disease, insisting that black is white, lies are the truth and vice versa, which is what people who lie all their lives wind up doing as they go mad.

For the record, and for the n’th time, here is the irrefutable proof that The Principality of Snake
Hill, Australia, is a crude fabrication (using a Washington, DC (202) number supplied for Wanta’s misuse by the French Embassy when M. Levitte, now President Sarkozy’s intelligence adviser in Paris, was French Ambassador to the United States. France covers for Germany under the Treaty of the Elysee [January 1963], providing DVD ‘Black’ operatives with cover). Ms Brenda Farrell of the Australian Embassy, Dublin, responded to our Irish associate, Richard Sharpe, as indicated in the segment reproduced from our report dated 20th September 2009 [see Archive] below:

‘PRINCIPALITY OF SNAKE HILL DOES NOT EXIST’: AUSTRALIAN EMBASSY, DUBLIN
On Wednesday 23rd September 2009, our Irish friend and associate, Mr Richard Sharpe, obtained independent confirmation from Ms. Brenda Farrell, of the Australian Embassy in Dublin, that ‘The Principality of Snake Hill’ does not exist, thereby reconfirming that the entire ‘Snake Hill’ operation is, as we explained in exhaustive detail below [i.e., in the report of 20 September], FRAUDULENT.

• This definitively destroys the bona fides and reputations of the poseurs and serial deception operatives exposed in this report, and should terminate the destructive activities of these people once and for all. They are FINISHED. They have been CAUGHT OUT. Before the whole world.

Forwarded message
From: <richardsharpe@eircom.net>
Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:25 PM
Subject: Fwd: Principality of Snake Hill [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
To: mrrichardsharpe <mrrichardsharpe@gmail.com>

richardsharpe@eircom.net wrote:
Many thanks for your timely response.

Regards
Richard

“Austremb Dublin” <Austremb.Dublin@dfat.gov.au> wrote:

Dear Mr Sharpe,

Thank you for your email.

There is no principality in Australia.

Kind regards

Australian Embassy
Dublin
Tel: +353 (0) 1 664 5300
Fax: +353 (0) 1 678 5185

richardsharpe@eircom.net

A reminder of just how cavalier the self-discrediting Heneghan, who opened bank accounts for al-Qaeda-funding Marvelous Investments Limited on behalf of Wanta (who, being a felon, cannot open or own any bank account) is with his fabricated facts, followed the foregoing definitive debunking of the ‘Principality of Snake Hill’ deception which Wanta is perpetuating in order to sustain his own mental delusion that he is an Ambassador, which is not the case:

THE EDITOR REMAINS IN NEW YORK
AND DID NOT ‘FLEE THE UNITED STATES’
The fantasmogorical allegation by a notorious US disinformation operative exposed in this report [Heneghan], that the Editor of this service fled the United States on Friday 18th September in order to escape arrest by the US Marshals Service, is inconsistent with the actual fact that the Editor is working ‘as we speak’ in his New York City office premises [as of 23rd September 2009*].

There is no need to labour the point that, given this stupid invention, none of the dogmatic statements that this notorious disinformation operative posts can ever command respect.

The fabrications of this and other notorious US disinformation artists have long since destroyed their ‘credibility’, making them a laughing stock and suggesting that the CIA disinformation apparat needs to review its operations and close many of them down.

• Their counterintelligence tradecraft seems to have become permanently counterproductive.

* The email from Ms Brenda Farrel of the Australian Embassy, Dublin, was sent and received on 23rd September. Our original report is dated 20th September, and the exposure of The Principality of Snake Hill as a fraud and a fabrication was confirmed in the Update of 23rd September 2009.

………………………………………………………………

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time AMENDING AND INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE. In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not for Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

SECURITISATION IS 100% ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. LEGISLATION

WHAT THE OFFICIAL RACKETEERS ARE DESPERATELY COVERING UP

Wednesday 10 March 2010 19:30

EAVESDROPPING AND CONSTANT AMERICAN TELEPHONE HARASSMENT
CONFIRM THAT THIS SERVICE IS RIGHT AT THE EPICENTRE OF THIS CRISIS

• REPORTS UPDATE: It has been decided to post this report, containing the ‘securitisation is illegal’ data, which was nearing completion when the fraud discovered on Monday and Tuesday, erupted. Our report on this monumental fraud (which we will call, for shorthand purposes, ‘the Pennsylvania Fraud’), will follow and will probably be alternated with the present analysis. The Editor has now obtained the underlying documentation on the Pennsylvania Fraud, and will be working on this exposure report immediately (so much for his regular publishing work schedule).

• MAJOR UPDATE, 12TH MARCH 2010:

OBAMA, GEITHNER AND THE D.C MEETING ON SECURITISATION
As elaborated below, securitisation in the United States is illegal and contrary to public policy.

All securitised contracts are void not least because they were created to facilitate one or more criminal acts, as explained in this presentation. By definition and US law, all contracts created to accommodate an illegal act are void.

So, what is happening in Washington, DC, ‘as we speak’? Why, a high-level meeting has been taking place to examine how SECURITISATION of FRNs can be used to dig the Obama Administration out of the void it has created by its bovine criminality and stupidity.

The prime movers of this demented, ILLEGAL activity are President Obama and Timothy Geithner, US Treasury Secretary, backed by other purblind officials such as Larry Summers. No doubt the careful timing of the publication of our exposure of securitisation here as completely illegal and contrary to the Rule of Law, will have given the underlings of these perpetrators some concern. Obama’s World Court-granted immunity from prosecution does not extend to domestic felonies.

UNITED KINGDOM: THE LAW OF PROPERTY ACT, 1925
In the United Kingdom, The Law of Property Act, 1925, particularly Section 136 which deals with assignments, makes it crystal clear that alienation by a mortgage provider of all assets that have been assigned without notice having been issued to, or permission granted by, the debtor, is void and fraudulent. Therefore, ALL SECURITISATION OPERATIONS BY FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS WITHIN THE BRITISH JURISDICTION WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN EXPLICITLY SANCTIONED IN ADVANCE BY THE MORTGAGOR, with the mortgagor fully aware of the situation, are void.

Northern Rock and all financial entities engaged in assigning, on-selling, trading and benefiting financially from such activity without notice to or the prior consent of the mortgagor, are engaged in CRIMINAL ACTIVITY. These institutions have accordingly been trading worthless paper between themselves within a fraudulent financial carousel, as repeatedly stated in these reports.

The Directors of these institutions should be investigated and prosecuted by the UK authorities: and if this does not happen, we will keep asking why not. No doubt Lord Myners [see Appendix below], the ‘City Minister’, knows the score perfectly well, and is being ‘economical with the truth’. In which case he is a co-conspirator in this criminality.

The bottom line here is that it is possible in the British jurisdiction to stop anyone who holds a contract for debt (the creditor) from passing that debt to a third party (debt collector) if they have not complied fully with The Law of Property Act 1925 and to hold them to the original contract and, therefore, to their stringent obligations to the debtor under the Consumer Credit Act, 1974. If they do not, the contract is toast and they cannot collect or sue for recovery of the debt. And the debtor is at liberty to counterclaim even if they do sue the debtor: which is another reason why they don’t do this. For this reason, no one talks about the The Law of Property Act, 1925. They will now!

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/ukpga/1925/cukpga_19250020_en_1

136 Legal assignments of things in action:
(1): Any absolute assignment by writing under the hand of the assignor (not purporting to be by
way of charge only) of any debt or other legal thing in action, OF WHICH EXPRESS NOTICE IN WRITING HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE DEBTOR, trustee or other person from whom the assignor would have been entitled to claim such debt or thing in action, is effectual in law (subject to equities having priority over the right of the assignee) to pass and transfer from the date of such notice:
(a) the legal right to such debt or thing in action;
(b) all legal and other remedies for the same; and
(c) the power to give a good discharge for the same without the concurrence of the assignor:

Provided that, if the debtor, trustee or other person liable
in respect of such debt or thing in action has notice:
(a) that the assignment is disputed by the assignor or any person claiming under him; or
(b) of any other opposing or conflicting claims to such debt or thing in action; he may, if he thinks fit, either call upon the persons making claim thereto to interplead concerning the same, or pay the debt or other thing in action into court under the provisions of the Trustee Act, 1925.

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
You can also access the CMKM/CMKX text at: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

• UPDATES, 11TH MARCH: The outline report on the Northern Rock case, in which the bank lied in writing to the paid-up mortgagor whose Title Deeds the bank said had been ‘de-materialised’ and held on to for FIVE YEARS AFTER THE MORTGAGE HAD BEEN PAID OFF, and yet finally disgorged after five years (during which time the householder could not sell her home), has triggered much interest. So we have added some new data beneath the outline Northern Rock report below.

• Under US whistleblower legislation, the whistleblower is entitled to a proportion of the fraud uncovered, a point made to the Editor this morning, too. No doubt this will likewise help to focus the serpentine minds of the criminal operatives being exposed. 15% to 30% of $4.2 trillion, plus $6.2 trillion, plus multiple billions, is a lot of dosh. In fact 15% of $10.4 trillion is $1.56 trillion, and 30% is $3.12 trillion. OK, the percentage is usually 10%, applicable only after conviction of course. So make that $1.04 trillion, then. Such awards are naturally available only to US taxpayers: please see the next report, on The Philadelphia Fraud, identified by a US taxpayer.

• LISTENING-IN TO OUR PHONE CALLS GIVES THE GAME AWAY

• WHY DO THEY LISTEN-IN TO EVERY WORD? WE’VE COMMITTED NO CRIMES

• WE’VE BEEN HARASSED DAILY WITH OBSCENE U.S. CALLS SINCE FEBRUARY 2008

• ‘MR STORY IS A PROBLEM FOR THEM BUT THEY CAN HANDLE IT PROVIDED
WHAT HE EXPOSES IS BLOCKED FROM THE ‘MAINSTREAM’’

• AS WE’VE COMMITTED NO CRIMES, AUTHORITIES SHOULD SUPPORT WHAT WE’RE
DOING TO HELP THEM DO THE JOB THEY ARE TOO CORRUPT TO DO UNAIDED

• THEY FALL OVER THEMSELVES TO LISTEN-IN, SO THEY CAN WARN
THE GUTLESS ‘MAINSTREAM’ OUTLETS TO BLOCK OUR EXPOSURES

• ALL THEY DO IS INFORM US BY THEIR SORDID BEHAVIOUR THAT WE ARE RIGHT
‘ON MESSAGE’ – WHICH IS BEYOND STUPID OF THEM, WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT

• CRIMINALISED INTELLIGENCE POWER INCOMPATIBLE WITH SOUND GOVERNANCE

• RACKETEERS CONSTANTLY CONFRONTED WITH THE RULE OF LAW

• COWARDLY CONTROLLED NEWSPAPERS WHICH HAVE IGNORED CIMKM/CMKX

• THE DAILY TELEGRAPH: A CONTROLLED OUTLET FOR MI-6

• MI-6 ‘INTEND TO TAKE MR CHRISTOPHER STORY OUT’

• BRITISH INTELLIGENCE APPEARS TO BE BEHAVING TREACHEROUSLY, AS USUAL

• ‘MAINSTREAM’ NEWSPAPERS REVEALING THEMSELVES
TO BE CO-CONSPIRATORS IN COVERING UP THE RACKETEERING

• WHY CONFINING EXPOSURES TO THIS WEBSITE HAS BEEN
COUNTERPRODUCTIVE FROM THE RACKETEERS’ PERSPECTIVE

• OUR EXPOSURE MODUS OPERANDI: ‘WALKING IN A STRAIGHT LINE’

• QUEEN’S GOLD THEFT STILL NOT RECTIFIED:
SO, KICK THE U.S. AMBASSADOR OUT OF LONDON

• STEALING OF $4.2 TRILLION TAX MONEY ON 31ST DECEMBER 2009
STILL NOT RECTIFIED: SO MASSIVE CRIMES HAVE BEEN COMMITTED

• FISH ROTS FROM THE STINKING HEAD: WORLD COURT IMMUNITY DEMANDED
AND SCANDALOUSLY OBTAINED BY THE COLLECTIVE OF CORRUPT U.S. PRESIDENTS

• GORBACHEV MANIPULATING DEVELOPMENTS FROM HIS WING IN THE KREMLIN, AS BEFORE

• GORBACHEV, BUSH, KOHL, ACKERMANN: RACKETEERING PARTNERS IN DEUTSCHE AG.

• WANTA: THE COURIER BETWEEN BUSH SENIOR AND GORBACHEV

• WANTA’S ‘REAGAN’S JUNK-YARD DOG’ DIVERSION

• WANTA KNEW ABOUT 9/11 IN ADVANCE, LIKE VREELAND

• FRANCE COVERS FOR GERMANY UNDER TREATY OF THE ELYSEE

• FRAUDULENT WANTA ‘SNAKE HILL’ WEBSITE’S GERMAN CONNECTIONS

• CIA/DVD PRACTICE OF EXPLOITING AND STEALING OUTSIDE EXPERTISE

• THE AMERICAN INTELLIGENCE POWER WHICH HAS USURPED
THE GOVERNMENT DANCES TO THE TUNE OF FOREIGN POWERS

• WORLD REVOLUTION RACKETEERING OFFENSIVE

• ‘WALKING IN A STRAIGHT LINE’ WILL EXPOSE THE DECEPTIONS

• COTTRELL THREATENS TO SNATCH AWAY THE RACKETEERS’ COVER,
THROWING THEM INTO A MAD PANIC. THIS WAS NOT ANTICIPATED.

• THE TWO MI-6 OPERATIVES WITH THE QUEEN’S SIGNATURE:
ARE THEY WORKING FOR, OR ARE THEY DOUBLE-CROSSING THE QUEEN?

• WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THE CHINESE CURRENCY BOXES?

• GREEK DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER EQUATES NAZI GERMANY
WITH CHANCELLOR MERKEL’S STASI GERMANY

• WHAT DO THE FOUR RACKETEERS HAVE IN COMMON
WITH OTHER WELL-KNOWN DECEASED AND LIVING OPERATIVES?

• ‘FORECLOSURE ANALYSIS’ PARA-LEGAL SERVICES SPRINGING UP IN THE UNITED STATES

• NORTHERN ROCK’S LIES TO A FORMER MORTGAGOR MASKING
THE FACT THAT HER TITLE DEEDS WERE ‘OTHERWISE ENGAGED’

• SECURITISATION IS A KEY ELEMENT OF A REVOLUTIONARY ATTACK ON PRIVATE PROPERTY

• YES, A RUTHLESS, SYSTEMATIC ATTACK ON PRIVATE PROPERTY

• LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR SCAMS STILL ‘OUT THERE’

• WHY SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. AND COMMON LAW

• SECURITISATION ENTAILS GROSS VIOLATIONS OF R.I.C.O. STATUTES

• NOTWITHSTANDING THAT IT’S ILLEGAL, U.S. AUTHORITIES
CONTINUE TO PROMOTE AND ENCOURAGE SECURITISATION

• SUMMARY FORENSIC ANALYSIS PROVING THE ILLEGALITY OF SECURITISATION

• SECURITISATION: A COVER FOR TAX EVASION

• SECURITISATION VIOLATES THE U.S BANKRUPTCY CODE
AND THEREFORE ALSO CONTRAVENES PUBLIC POLICY

• SECURITISATION VIOLATES FEDERAL R.I.C.O. STATUTES

• SECURITISATION ALSO VIOLATES U.S. ANTITRUST LEGISLATION

• There is also the tenet of English law of contract which governs US law, too, that any contract entered into in order to commit a crime is (automatically) void. So what exactly do the American and British Governments think they are doing ‘accommodating’ securitisation, given this principle?

• THE ‘PHILIPPINES EXCEPTION’ BURIED IN THE CLAYTON ACT

• FANNIE MAE, FREDDIE MAC ENGAGED IN FURTHER ILLEGAL SECURITISATION:
RE-SECURITISING ALREADY SECURITISED ‘DUD’ ASSETS TO DUMP BACK ON THE BANKS

• GARY GENSLER IS NOT AS OPPOSED TO FRAUDULENT FINANCE AS HE SEEMS

• ‘GREATER TRANSPARENCY’ IS EVIDENTLY ALL GENSLER’S AFTER

• INVESTORS’ MONEY USED TO REMUNERATE WALL STREET

•’THE MONEY YOU MAKE BY MISUSING MY MONEY
IS MY MONEY‘ – I.E., THE HOME OWNER’S

• A PERVERSE AND ARROGANT OFFICIAL INTENT TO CONTINUE VIOLATING U.S. LAW

• THE DEPOSITORY TRUST & CLEARING CORPORATION IS IN OVERDRIVE

• THE FEDERAL RESERVE HAS BECOME
THE BACK-STOP GUARANTOR OF CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS

• STAGE SET FOR AN UNIMAGINABLE (AVOIDABLE)
CATASTROPHE: A DEATH-WISH

• THE DTCC’S OBLIGATIONS WAREHOUSE SERVICE

• GREATER TRANSPARENCY WON’T ELIMINATE SYSTEMIC RISK,
OR PREVENT A CONFIDENCE CRISIS

• SO, WHERE ARE YOU, MR HOLDER?

• APPENDIX: LORD MYNERS SAYS THERE MUST BE PENALTIES FOR BANK EXCESSES

• POSTSCRIPT: STIGLITZ: ‘THE AMERICAN BANKING SYSTEM IS CORRUPT’

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

LISTENING-IN TO OUR PHONE CALLS GIVES THE GAME AWAY
If we go back to square one and start asking basic questions about our experiences with these exposures, interesting answers emerge. The first question that arises is this:

• Why is it that so many intelligence eavesdroppers listen to every domestic and especially international telephone call that we make and receive?

After all, the Editor has not stolen any money, has not murdered anyone, has not abducted anyone else’s child, is not a Nazi war criminal, is not engaged in espionage, is not an agent of a foreign power, has not defrauded anyone, and is not engaged in criminal activity in any shape or form. And neither, for instance, is Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., let alone Mr A. Clifton Hodges, the Attorney for the CMKM/CMKX victims, whom the Editor speaks to quite frequently on the transatlantic line.

Is it that these eager eavesdroppers like the sound of the Editor’s voice? Do they seek knowledge from us that they could not obtain from other sources? Are we the fount of all known wisdom in the universe? What do we know and say that others don’t know and can’t say, which these decadent snoopers find so electrifying in our conversations? There must be SOME explanation for their manic preoccupation with what we have to say in our private communications.

WHY DO THEY LISTEN-IN TO EVERY WORD? WE’VE COMMITTED NO CRIMES
Because given that we have committed no crimes, and neither are we patriots terrorists, there HAS to be a coherent reason why these despicable little UK, US and foreign snooping apparatchiks rush to pick up their earpieces every time we begin a conversation – knocking over their plastic coffee cups and making a mess of their work spaces in their frantic anxiety to garner every precious nugget that falls from our lips. One can hear these scum clicking in one after the other.

Oh, the red light’s gone on, we’ve got to record what Story and his correspondents are saying. Why do they need to fall over themselves to find out what we discuss, as we have committed no crimes and are not terrorists?

And why are they routinely engaged in issuing threats against the Editor of this service, and also against Mr Cottrell, and harassing both on a routine basis – Mr Cottrell as recently as 6th March? The Editor, as previously reported, has received daily voicemail messages from a controlled MK-Ultra-style ‘Black’ US DVD nutcase via Skype (Washington, DC) since the Wanta ‘switch’ in February 2008: on some days, we have counted as many as nine such demented harassment calls.

WE’VE BEEN HARASSED DAILY WITH OBSCENE U.S. CALLS SINCE FEBRUARY 2008
These crude harassment calls, which as indicated have been continuing since the Wanta ‘switch’ in 2008, reminiscent of a DVD operation (because of their Bavarian Illuminati-style ‘Black’ content and because Germans never know when to stop, and when they have been defeated) have no effect on the Editor’s work, mind or intentions: yet some ignorant cadre inside the US component of the CIA/DVD revolutionary structures is employed, for money, to continue this illegal harassment.

They seem to think it will wear us down. Instead, the parties being worn down are those who are determined, despite our exposures of their iniquity, to continue their racketeering operations in defiance of the Rule of Law that they despise.

They never thought they would encounter any opposition, and they have been on the wrong foot ever since we stood up to them. Real opposition was never anticipated.

What arrogance! What right do these little malodorous eavesdropping twerps have to intercept our telecommunications and to record what we have to say – sending, we understand, transcripts of our coveted exchanges to the White House?

What right do the National Security Agency, GCHQ, French, Israeli and German intelligence have to listen-in to our phone calls? Are we at the apex of human understanding? Do we dispense pearls of insight and wisdom so penetrating that that these little creeps cannot develop them from other sources? Now let’s broaden our enquiry further, leading in to the next question.

‘MR STORY IS A PROBLEM FOR THEM BUT THEY CAN HANDLE IT PROVIDED
WHAT HE EXPOSES IS BLOCKED FROM THE ‘MAINSTREAM’’
As displayed at the top of our report dated 2nd March 2010, Mr A. Clifton Hodges, Attorney for the 50,000 CMKM/CMKX scamees (whose CMKM stock was exploited when 2.25 trillion PHANTOM SHARES were floated via an illegal platform from WITHIN the Securities and Exchange Commission itself, under the criminal George W. Bush Administration (between June 2004 and October 2005)), was informed by an inside source that ‘Christopher Story is a problem for them, but they think they can handle it PROVIDED that what he exposes does not spill over into the ‘mainstream’ media’ [see our report dated 2nd March 2010].

The source of this information was a US official whose job it is to ENFORCE THE LAW, not to connive in violating it for purposes of expediency.

AS WE’VE COMMITTED NO CRIMES, AUTHORITIES SHOULD SUPPORT WHAT WE’RE
DOING TO HELP THEM DO THE JOB THEY ARE TOO CORRUPT TO DO UNAIDED
One would have thought that since what we are exposing is RAMPANT RACKETEERING AND CRIMINALITY WITHIN THE U.S. GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES, as well as inside the corrupted financial institutions, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the criminal enterprise known as the Central Intelligence Agency, such US operatives and officials would be only too keen on encouraging the broad dissemination of information liable to lead to the indictment and arrest of the racketeers and criminals that are being protected within and close to the Washington Beltway.

But that is not the case! On the contrary, this and other ‘inside’ sources appear to have been engaged in a systematic operation to use Story, Cottrell and now Hodges as a foil and barrier, behind which to plan double-dealing and continued financial deception, and to deceive at least the first two named, in order – as with the original Wanta deception – to preserve a smokescreen as cover for the pursuit of racketeering ‘business as usual’ in general.

The intention here has been to try to conduct the US Dollar Refunding themselves, with FRNs – which will lead very rapidly to a catastrophe, so that the racketeers below the radar can then, so they imagine, unscramble and release their accumulated and worthless nominal ‘derivative’ values from off-balance sheet and offshore sources, for deployment (as is currently happening to some extent) for the Fascist-style purpose of snapping up real assets at firesale prices.

• That’s the goal of the World Revolution.

THEY FALL OVER THEMSELVES TO LISTEN-IN, SO THEY CAN WARN
THE GUTLESS ‘MAINSTREAM’ OUTLETS TO BLOCK OUR EXPOSURES
So, on the one hand, the eavesdroppers knock over their dirty plastic coffee cups as they fall over themselves to listen to and record what we have to say on the telephone; while on the other hand, they appear to be seeing to it that what we have to discuss, and what the Editor is exposing, never reaches beyond the in-house intelligence censorship ‘pods’ sitting inside all press rooms of the controlled ‘mainstream’ media, prompting the next question:

• Why are these manipulators so anxious to hear what we have to say and simultaneously so determined that what we have to say and expose never hits the ‘mainstream’?

After all, given that we have committed no crimes and are not terrorists, and the governments which these despicable little eavesdropping worms serve, supposedly believe in ‘democracy’ and ‘free speech’, don’t you know, it should surely follow that if the eavesdroppers consider that what we have to say is so superb and priceless, their governments would all be awfully keen that our invaluable information and insights should be spread extensively abroad so that the sum of human understanding is enhanced, to the benefit of all, the governments included, n’est-ce-pas?

ALL THEY DO IS INFORM US BY THEIR SORDID BEHAVIOUR THAT WE ARE RIGHT
‘ON MESSAGE’ – WHICH IS BEYOND STUPID OF THEM, WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT
There is of course one benefit to all this – namely, that by listening in to all our telecommunications so routinely and conspicuously, and by engaging in such persistent and futile non-stop telephone harassment (which is recorded by us for future legal reference, not listened to, and zapped), the criminal intelligence cadres concerned are signalling to us LOUD AND CLEAR that we are indeed being highly effective: otherwise they wouldn’t be wasting their time and financial resources in such underhand and counterproductive activities, would they.

So, as we have previously pointed out, these intelligence and masonic cadres are indeed plain STUPID! By their behaviour, they are telling us that we’re being effective, making a difference, and that we’re getting in the way of their racketeering operations by exposing them (as you will see from the next post!). So the confused, panicking fools are telling us all we need to know. It’s neat!

Obviously, there’s something wrong here: and one doesn’t need a first class degree in logic to be able to discern the problem. We haven’t committed any crimes and are not terrorists. Why, then, do these authorities compete among themselves not only to listen to and record what we have to say, but also to prevent the ‘mainstream’ from picking up our insights and assessments?

• ANSWER: Because the governments themselves are engaged in the very financial terrorist criminality and racketeering that we are exposing, and are terrified that the exposures will lead to what from their perspectives might become intolerable ‘unintended consequences’, with rolling outcomes that they couldn’t control. And this is in fact what is going to happen, sooner or later.

CRIMINALISED INTELLIGENCE POWER INCOMPATIBLE WITH SOUND GOVERNANCE
At this point we need to insert an obvious but almost always overlooked anomaly arising from the fact, mentioned in earlier reports, that the coexistence of criminalised, racketeering intelligence powers enjoying carte blanche to embezzle public funds and break the law (and to indulge in petty dirty tricks and bearing false witness such as those involving Gordon Thomas on behalf of MI-6: see Note (1) below), with a system supposedly based on the Rule of Law, is INCOMPATIBLE WITH SOUND GOVERNANCE – let alone with the supposed supremacy of legality.

If they prefer a system without the Rule of Law, why bother any longer with Congress and routinely rigged elections which make a mockery of democracy and just confirm that the US authorities, who hypocritically preach democracy to the Rest of the World, are indistinguishable from corrupt ‘post’-Soviet régimes, where ballot boxes (as in Ireland) are brought pre-stuffed to the polling stations?

Because the criminalised intelligence powers and those serving them:

• Exhibit open contempt for the Rule of Law, but exploit it on an open-ended basis when it suits their own nefarious purposes.

• Seek to avoid leaving traces which would contravene the law when committing their endless crimes, and yet employ every delaying and obfuscation device known to Satan, to save their own skins whenever they perceive they are themselves in danger of the full wrath of legal enforcement.

• Have failed actually to ABOLISH the Rule of Law which they exploit, injure and contravene 24/7 in their pursuit of their ‘Black’ and illegal objectives – which they imagine are ‘allowed’ in the United States thanks to the cover that they assume to be provided under the National Security Act of 1947 et seq. (the criminals’ charter).

RACKETEERS CONSTANTLY CONFRONTED WITH THE RULE OF LAW
This sick mindset was further encouraged in the United States by such ill-advised liberties as President Reagan’s counterproductive Executive Order 12333 of 1981, which catastrophically authorised US intelligence operatives to form corporations of which the operatives themselves could own the shares and which would then ostensibly ‘contract’ with the compartmentalised components of the Intelligence Power and other US agencies to perform tasks required by the Executive Branch, for which the controlling Intelligence Power acts as the clandestine arm.

Obviously, to contract with intelligence operatives who are required by Statute to deny that they are intelligence operatives and therefore to lie for a living, is equivalent to entering into a contract with the fox to guard the chicken house. Significantly, Gorbachëv’s Politburo copied this crass 1981 Reagan formula in 1990.

Therefore, while abusing and contravening the despised Rule of Law, these amoral US officials are constantly being confronted by it. Despite their disdain of the Rule of Law, it stands in their way, and they keep bumping into it, even though they do their best all the time to corrupt it.

This ironical state of affairs provides, of course, another convenient underlying, ongoing dialectic (Thesis, Antithesis) – ripe for exploitation: but in this particular case, the dialectic is a ‘given’, not an artificial construct. In other words, short of an actual criminal dictatorship, there’s not a lot they can do to alleviate their situation here other than to continue compromising, abusing and eroding the Rule of Law, through bribery and corruption.

We have established already that: the criminal governments themselves are engaged in the very racketeering criminality that we are having to expose, given not least that, as reviewed below, ALL SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. AND COMMON LAW – and are terrified that the endless exposures will lead to what, from their perspectives, might become truly intolerable ‘unintended consequences’, with rolling outcomes that they couldn’t control.

COWARDLY CONTROLLED NEWSPAPERS WHICH HAVE IGNORED CIMKM/CMKX
Because of this cowardice on the penetrated governments’ part, the newspapers listed below have been officially prevented, to our own certain updated knowledge [10th March], from reporting even the eminently reportable CMKM/CMKX case, in which payment of $3.87 trillion is demanded from the Securities and Exchange Commission and from certain of its current and former officials, given the unprecedented scandal of the S.E.C. having floated 2.25 trillion PHANTOM SHARES from a platform operated beneath the cover of the Securities and Exchange Commission itself (2).

• Note: Page B1 of the New York Edition of The New York Times dated 12th March carries the first ‘mainstream’ report of the CMKM/CMKX case, twisted to ignore the essence of the case and to suggest, contrary to the truth of the matter, that this is just another instance of the phenomenon that scamees can never admit that they have been scammed. Naturally, one did not expect such a newspaper to report the truth, which can be established from the Complaint [see our report dated 9th January (over two months prior to The New York Times’ article)]. No, the newspaper found a spurious, populist angle which has nothing to do with the substance of the Complaint against the S.E.C., indicating how nervous the US Establishment is over these developments.

Any ‘mainstream’ newspaper that was fulfilling its responsibilities objectively as a conscientious component of the Fourth Estate would have jumped on this story long ago. After all, we published the complete text of the Complaint within hours of it being filed [see our report dated 9th January 2010]. That was TWO MONTHS BACK: and so far, NONE of the ‘mainstream’ US/UK newspapers or broadcast outlets have touched this dynamite. SPECIFICALLY:

• Mr A. Clifton Hodges, Attorney for the 50,000+ CMKM/CMKX scammees, personally informed press contacts about the case, on the following media:

• The Los Angeles Times

• The Washington Post

• The Wall Street Journal

Mr Hodges received no response.

• The Editor of this service personally informed the prominent UK financial journalist Ambrose Evans-Pritchard on The Daily Telegraph, whom he has met in the past. Since The Daily Telegraph’s offices are within walking distance of our Central London office, the Editor offered to deliver a copy of the actual Summons and Complaint by hand last week.

• The Editor did not even receive the courtesy of an acknowledgment of his emails.

THE DAILY TELEGRAPH: A CONTROLLED OUTLET FOR MI-6
Notwithstanding his duplicitous behaviour in acting as an agent for MI-6 in bearing false witness against the Editor of this service in 2004, Gordon Thomas is persona grata at The Daily Telegraph, and recently published a large article in that paper on the subject of the use of British passports by Israel assassination operatives. As the Editor’s case shows, Thomas also acts as an agent for MI-6.

Therefore, The Daily Telegraph is under the thumb of MI-6, which helps to explain quite why this newspaper – which used to publish extensive op-ed. articles by the Editor of this service in the 1970s and early 1960s, until the takeover by the since disgraced and jailed corrupt globalist felon Conrad Black – has failed so far in its duty as a key member of the Fourth Estate to report (a) the biggest official corruption case to come to Court in world history and (b) the biggest and most-far-reaching exposure of government and financial institution racketeering since the world began.

MI-6 ‘INTEND TO TAKE MR CHRISTOPHER STORY OUT’
At about 10.45pm on Sunday 7th March, the Editor was informed via a transatlantic phone call that the Editor’s correspondent had been informed by an ‘inside’ source directly connected with MI-9 (MI-6) that ‘MI-6 intend to ‘take Mr Story out’’. Apparently the intention was or is to prepare one or more ‘stings’ and traps, in the hope that the Editor will fall into them, as happened once or twice before (given that, since these people only ‘do’ deception, it is almost impossible to avoid being deceived at some stage: except that the longer they drag out their cynical games, the easier it becomes to read their criminal minds and the unchanging techniques they use (the devil isn’t a great inventor)): so the deeper the discernment one eventually acquires, and the less chance do they have of pulling off a targeted dirty trick, as intended.

The Editor enquired why this evil intent should have surfaced at this late stage in the racketeering exposure proceedings: to which the answer was: ‘They want to move on by fixing things below the radar, they are furious that you have so much information, and they want to make sure you don’t publicise the outcome, especially concerning the Dollar Refunding which they have resisted so hard, when it happens’. To which the Editor responded words to the following effect: ‘Well, a gentleman’s word is his bond. They can walk across the bridge and ring our office doorbell’.

‘They wouldn’t do that. They’d sting you instead’.

Quite right: they can’t do that now, as they have squandered so many resources trying to entrap and trip the Editor up, that a ‘gentlemanly approach’ wouldn’t work now. It would probably have worked back in 2002: but not now. If you have been deceived and abused already by your own (let alone the hideous, criminalised American) intelligence services, you aren’t likely to succumb to such a ‘gentlemanly approach’. They burned their boats.

• Not very clever: but then again, as we’ve seen, these people are extraordinarily STUPID.

BRITISH INTELLIGENCE APPEARS TO BE BEHAVING TREACHEROUSLY, AS USUAL
Anyway, thanks for the heads-up – reiterated, by the way, by the faux-demented DVD ‘Black’ Psy-Ops voice who’s being paid to plague us daily since the completion of the Leo Wanta ‘switch’ in February 2008 (as revisited briefly above). So, what we have is the following devilish equation:

(1): The Editor of this service is a patriotic supporter of the nation state, is exactly what he says he is and has been for decades [see our testimonials], is viscerally opposed to the pagan, decadent, debauched World Revolution and its filthy ‘Black’ social and geopolitical detritus which is such a menace to civilisation, is a loyal subject of Her Majesty the Queen (with no other such connections whatsoever), believes (whether you like it or not) that Jesus Christ is the Lord, and is come in the flesh, and has stood up forcefully (because we have no choice, not because of any courage) to the abominations, abuses, verbal abuse and agitprop tirades, betrayals, successive threats (including seven death threats), innumerable lies and attempted ‘stings’, and the cynical exploitation by Mr Wanta of the Editor’s integrity and expertise; and has nevertheless sought to expose elements of the officially perpetrated and condoned racketeering and embezzlement of US taxpayers’ funds, and the myriad other Fraudulent Finance atrocities perpetrated with impunity under five self-acknowledged criminal Presidents of the United States.

(2): In exchange for which, conniving British intelligence cadres, according to the US ‘insider’ source whose identity is known to the Editor, are actively seeking ‘as we speak’ to ‘take Story out’ and to try, once again – à la Gordon Thomas – to discredit him.

This is to be the Editor’s reward for the serial abuse, deceit, lies, attempted ‘stings’, deceptions and other pathetic, underhand travesties, that the Editor has suffered in recent years in exposing these crimes. And these abuses, by the way, are AS NOTHING compared to what others, especially Michael C. Cottrell, have suffered at the hands of these serial thieves, racketeers and reprobate operatives over a much longer period of time.

• The Editor personally sent emails last week giving details of the CMKM/CMKX case to 14 well-known newspapers in India, Pakistan, China, Hong Kong, Malaysia and The Philippines, with the coordinates of Mr Hodges so that their journalists could check everything with the source. At the time of this posting, there had been no response.

‘MAINSTREAM’ NEWSPAPERS REVEALING THEMSELVES
TO BE CO-CONSPIRATORS IN COVERING UP THE RACKETEERING
None of this surprises us, given the above, nor does it even suggest that the Dark Forces are not in the process of being defeated. On the contrary, by cow-towing to their criminalised governments and intelligence communities, these newspapers are just allowing themselves to be tarred with the same Black Racketeering Brush that has covered the known official and financial criminalists with sticky black gunge that runs down into the sewer.

All that these media outlets are doing by ignoring these investigations is to confirm that they, too, are parties to, minded to be in favour of, and doubtless in many cases participants in, the familiar Fraudulent Finance racketeering practices that the perpetrators are trying in vain to cover up. In some US cases (known to this service), key media outlets are recipients of giant bribes paid out specifically in order to prevent them from covering these investigations.

We haven’t yet revealed the identities of the US news media concerned; but if there exists such a phenomenon as an honest journalist working for any of them, we would remind such persons of the basic reality that the bribee is actually in a stronger position than the distributor of the bribe – who won’t want to be exposed.

His bribe is presumably held in place by threats of lethal consequences, or blackmail: but these implied or actual threats are usually empty and cannot be fulfilled without entangling the source of the bribe in a cauldron of problems arising from his iniquity that he would wish to avoid.

WHY CONFINING EXPOSURES TO THIS WEBSITE HAS BEEN
COUNTERPRODUCTIVE FROM THE RACKETEERS’ PERSPECTIVE
And by adopting the strategy of trying to confine these exposures of official and financial sector racketeering to this website (even though some indications of broader coverage, with which we are associated, are ‘in the pipeline’), the US cover-up cadres have managed (counterproductively, from their disoriented perspective) to contrive that a reasonably consistent corpus of information has emerged into the public domain, as well as being captured for posterity and current research in successive issues of International Currency Review, which has official, central bank, institutional and library subscribers throughout the world – thereby precluding any possibility of the heirs of the perpetrators rewriting history so as to ‘airbrush’ this financial racketeering out of the record.

OUR EXPOSURE MODUS OPERANDI: ‘WALKING IN A STRAIGHT LINE’
Proceeding now to our modus operandi, we reiterate that our method is the straightforward one of ‘walking in a straight line’. Unlike your agents of influence and disinformation outlets – including notorious website peddlers of ‘Black Propaganda’, lies and confusion operating under Intelligence Power instructions to maximise the potential of the ‘Black’ fog of disinformation for the purpose of covering up the racketeering – our method, having done our due diligence to the extent possible, is to publish what we have learned either directly or else covered by a necessary ‘to the best of our knowledge and belief’ caution.

When we obtain information which can only be forthcoming from ‘inside’ and, very often, from dissident and double-crossed intelligence sources (because these people are always bitterly at loggerheads internally), we may publish such information ‘straight’ with no qualifications at all.

An example of this was our revelation that the late former Governor of the Bank of England, Lord ‘Eddie’ George, had been arrested and briefly jailed in July 2007. We have only recently learned, and publicised, WHY Lord George was arrested.

Lord George was seized because of his rôle in aiding, abetting and facilitating, with the criminal operative Dr Alan Greenspan, the stealing/diversion of The Queen’s gold on 29th-30th March 2007, as we reported six weeks or so later. Lord George, who died in April 2009, was instrumental in exchanging the gold for worthless pieces of ‘derivatives’ paper.

QUEEN’S GOLD THEFT STILL NOT RECTIFIED:
SO, KICK THE U.S. AMBASSADOR OUT OF LONDON
That operation represented the Bush-CIA-DVD’s biggest theft ever; AND IT STILL HASN’T BEEN RECTIFIED. If UK Governments consisted of people with conviction, knowledge and backbone, instead of the usual blackmailed, compromised and controlled psychological cases with dirty intelligence backgrounds, the American Ambassador should be ordered out of Britain, with his Embassy peremptorily closed sine die – until such time as this unspeakable assault has been resolved. When we mentioned this demand, which we first made in the summer of 2007, to a US contact, she said: ‘That’s precisely what the pan-Germans and the covert Soviets want’.

• To which our response is: SO WHAT?

If Lord George had even contemplated instructing his solicitors to try to obtain a retraction from us, he would immediately have been told advised nothing could be done because Christopher Story’s information was accurate (even though it was obtained from secret sources), and that Lord George couldn’t know what back-up information Mr Story held in support of his revelations.

In any case, to challenge such a report would certainly have embroiled the former Governor of the Bank of England in a dangerous encounter. Far better to assume that the sensational report would remain ‘buried’ in International Currency Review, and also covered by the Gordon Thomas MI-6 ‘blanket false witness’ lies about the Editor to the gullible so-called ‘mainstream’ media.

STEALING OF $4.2 TRILLION TAX MONEY ON 31ST DECEMBER 2009
STILL NOT RECTIFIED: SO MASSIVE CRIMES HAVE BEEN COMMITTED
Likewise, when we reported that the tax on the Settlements monies had indeed been subtracted effective 31st December 2009, we had obtained hard information to that effect, backing up ‘inside’ information provided via impeccably reliable sources. Specifically, we received an email at 20:24 UK time, on 1st January 2010, from a key figure involved in the Settlements (said by key US ‘inside’ sources, who may have been lying to our contacts, to be briefed to pay off corrupt US politicians) who was in almost daily contact with us by email under a pseudonym for over two and a half years, stating that: ‘sources here [in Dallas] and in Europe told me my taxes were taken off the top on or before 12/31 in order for them to be credited into Fiscal 2009. I got that word Wednesday 12/30/09’.

Since these taxes have not been restored to the Settlements funds which had not been paid out by the 45-day deadline of 14th February (by which date the funds from which the taxes had been taken should by law have been remitted):

• WHERE IS THAT TAX MONEY?

• WAS IT STOLEN AND IF SO, WHO STOLE IT, MR GEITHNER?

• WAS IT PLACED OUT ON CONTRACT, after $100 billion had been siphoned off into the hands of a well-known US false religion as we have reported, and if so, who is or was the foreign corrupt counterparty? Brazil? Zimbabwe? Denmark? Deutsche Bank, Frankfurt?

China Trust Bank? Barclays Bank?

• WHO are the foreign counterparties that have collaborated with the criminals in the White House, the US Treasury, the State Department and the CIA to STEAL over $4.0 trillion from the account of the US taxpayer, and imagine that there will be no ‘consequences’?

Of course, the problem that the official racketeers faced was that the tax accruals ‘could not be placed into the taxpayers’ accounts’ – because, suddenly, the $4.5 trillions squandered by the current reckless Obama Government would have been restored overnight – raising questions about SOURCE OF FUNDS. Ah, so THAT’s why there’s been a blackout across the board of these exposures and investigations, is it? Well, no: as will be shown, it’s much worse than that.

• They couldn’t pay the tax monies into the taxpayers’ accounts: so they just STOLE IT, which was what they always intended to do, anyway.

• Keep asking yourself basic questions like: WOULD THEY STEAL IT? THE ANSWER TO SUCH BASIC QUESTIONS CONCERNING THESE DESPERATE CRIMINALS IS: SURE. NATURLICH.

As can be seen from Mr Hodges’ letter to the Office of the New York State Attorney General [see our report dated 2nd March 2010], we know [and in any case, see above] that these tax monies were not ‘replaced’ back into the Settlements pool – as a consequence of which the perpetrators now face extremely severe criminal sanctions, as Mr Hodges has pointed out to Andrew Cuomo’s office when demanding an investigation, given that some of the main perpetrators, and many of his own client CMKM/CMKX victims (whose monies appear to be tied up with the Settlements funds) are resident in the State of New York [See Note 3].

How is it possible that this grievous official criminality and blatant racketeering has continued, notwithstanding these exposures (albeit in the context of the complicit and cowardly failure of the Fourth Estate to do its job properly)?

FISH ROTS FROM THE STINKING HEAD: WORLD COURT IMMUNITY DEMANDED
AND SCANDALOUSLY OBTAINED BY THE COLLECTIVE OF CORRUPT U.S. PRESIDENTS
The starting point here will be to remind you that FISH ROTS FROM THE HEAD and that we have reported that in or around September 2009, five US Presidents – Carter (39), Bush Senior (41), Clinton (42), Bush Junior (43) and Obama (44) DEMANDED IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION from the World Court. This immunity was, we were told, GRANTED – in a disgraceful abuse of power by the World Court, which appears to have caved in to Mr Obama’s DEMAND on behalf of himself and his four criminal predecessors.

As we can see from this episode, President Obama has been in lock-step with these four criminal predecessors – which eliminates all residual (courtesy) expectations that he might have had the guts to stand up to these racketeers. That would, however, have been impossible – since this operative, whatever his background, is of course a placeman and a puppet of the controlling criminalised US Intelligence Power.

We can thus state without fear of contradiction on the basis of the foregoing information that the five US Presidents openly acknowledge that THEY ARE CRIMINALS. If you are not a criminal, you do not need immunity from prosecution. These operatives, working together as a PRESIDENTIAL COLLECTIVE, demanded and received the immunity from prosecution that they sought.

That of course means that the World Court which sustains the figleaf of legality at the corrupted intergovernmental level (where in fact the Rule of Law does not operate properly or at all, or can be non-existent) is COMPLICIT IN LETTING ALL THESE CRIMINALS OFF THE HOOK – in other words, condones criminality at the highest level, irrespective of the consequences (which in this context includes destroying the lives, savings, hopes and physical assets of hundreds of thousands and probably millions of victims).

In translation, the World Court appears to regard its job as DEFENDING RACKETEERS IN HIGH PLACES – not to sustain the Rule of Law at the intergovernmental level without fear or favour.

GORBACHEV MANIPULATING DEVELOPMENTS FROM HIS WING IN THE KREMLIN. AS BEFORE
Behind this scandal of scandals, lies the deeper reality which we have publicised but which none of the ‘mainstream’ media has picked up on, and which, we are informed, is now of ‘no interest’ to the present generation. We refer to the PROVEN FACT that former President Mikhail Gorbachëv, who fronted ‘collapsible Communism’ for the benefit of the confused ‘mainstream media’ and strutted the stage for years thereafter (and indeed continues to do so, to this day), collaborated AND STILL COLLABORATES with the Black Godfather of the criminally penetrated US Intelligence Power, the Langley base of which is labelled the George Bush Center for Intelligence.

GORBACHEV, BUSH, KOHL, ACKERMANN: RACKETEERING PARTNERS IN DEUTSCHE AG.
Specifically, as we have exclusively reported, Gorbachëv is a partner with George H. W. Bush Sr. and Dr Helmut Kohl, the former Chancellor of Germany, together with Dr Joseph Ackermann, in Deutsche AG., formerly Barrington Investment Group, St. Gallen, Switzerland, which handles the illegal proceeds of racketeering operations – as was the case with the proceeds derived from the stealing of a contract belonging to Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., and which was facilitated by the ‘electronic stealing and forging’ of Mr Cottrell’s signature. The background detail to these crimes is re-presented herewith:

• Former President Mikhail S. Gorbachev, working with former US President George H. W. Bush Sr., former German Chancellor Dr Helmut Kohl and Dr Joseph Ackermann, all partners in Deutsche AG (formerly Barrington Investment Group), Switzerland, stole a contract using the electronic tag to the securities account owned by Mr Michael C. Cottrell’s Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., with Benchmark Securities, Inc., New Jersey, at a table-top meeting in Geneva on 7th October 2002 by the means described below, which included the electronic ‘forging’ of Mr Cottrell’s signature.

This theft was preceded by seven related thefts from Mr Cottrell’s firm’s securities account.

• This means that former President Mikhail Gorbachev and former German Chancellor Helmut Kohl are financial criminals like George H. B. Bush Sr., and should be treated accordingly.

Mr Gorbachev and Helmut Kohl have, as partners in Deutsche AG, by definition been profiting from the theft of Mr Cottrell’s contract and property, and also from huge proceeds from the theft of The Queen’s gold, which, we were specifically informed at 1.15 am by telephone on 4th February 2010, have likewise been channelled through Deutsche AG, St Gallen, Switzerland.

• As of 10th March 2010, The Queen’s gold had not been restored.

• The proceeds of innumerable corrupt transactions involving Gorbachëv, Bush Sr., Kohl and Ackermann have been run through the DVD’s main institutions, Deutsche Bank and Dresdner Bank.
So what is being exposed is that George H. W. Bush Sr. (CIA/DVD) and Mikhail Gorbachev (Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) and KGB/FSB) have been systematically ransacking American and non-American victims alike, and running this colossal open-ended racketeering through Germany, with the assistance of the former STASI of East Germany (who are GESTAPO in relabelled clothing).

Hence the presence on the scene of STASI operatives such as Eva Teleki, a (separate) ‘Swedish’ opera singer, and other dirty operatives suspected of being continuing STASI agents, such as Chancellor Angela Merkel (the former Secretary of the Agitation and Propaganda Department of the Young Communists at Marx Lenin University, in East Berlin). This explains why Merkel was earlier fingered by this service as the guardian in Germany of George H W Bush Sr.’s stolen and exploited racketeering assets with German institutions.

• Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin (Shalomov), who is a senior Soviet GRU operative, was based in East Germany before he migrated to Leningrad, and is believed to have been primarily responsible for orchestrating, at least from the Soviet side, the clockwork ‘collapsible Communism’ operations in Eastern Europe. Gorbachev has been reported to us to operate from a wing of the Kremlin, as though he never left the place.

• Which he didn’t. He’s been at the centre of this revolutionary criminality THROUGHOUT.

WANTA: THE COURIER BETWEEN BUSH SENIOR AND GORBACHEV
Reconsider now the unsavoury, treacherous rôle of Mr Leo/Lee Wanta in this context. As we have repeatedly shown [see our reports dated 20th September 2009, 22nd October 2009, 17th November 2009 and 29th January 2010 for instance], Wanta’s ‘Principality of Snake Hill’ cover, which provides him with a fraudulent virtual ‘Ambassadorship’ from the non-existent ‘Principality of Snake Hill’ to the United States ‘enabling’ him to continue using the false self-designation ‘Ambassador’, is the clumsy concoction of an undischarged felon who has stolen inter alia this Editor’s $35,000 loan plus interest and other monies, cannot own a bank account because he is a felon, and not only answers the telephone in German with ‘GUTEN TAG’, but spells telephone TELEFON, Groupe with an ‘e’ as in French, while also masquerading behind this false front using a 202 telephone number provided by the French Embassy in Washington, DC.

Thus AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc, with ‘Groupe’ spelt as in French, was a French/DVD operation set up with the assistance of the former French Ambassador to Washington, DC, Monsieur Levitte, now President Sarkozy’s top intelligence advisor – its purpose being to steal/divert funds on behalf of the Bush-CIA-DVD racketeers for which the bilateral treaty-bound Vichy-French authorities, being complicit with the pan-Germans in this corruption (think of the 3,000+ Bush-linked accounts with Paribas in Paris), provide permanent cover.

No wonder Wanta, who had operated out of Vienna in the late 1980s and early 1990s, had to sack Michael Cottrell as Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. (which he did ‘illegally’ on 23rd March 2008: see website reports) when it became obvious that Cottrell and Story were hot on the trail of this devious foreign operation to steal vast funds belonging to the United States of America and its taxpayers. Against this background, please be reminded [see our report dated the 20th September 2009] that Wanta’s nauseating ‘excess patriotism’ and ‘apple-pie Americanism’ is ALL FAKE – part of his elaborate but now exposed cover, as is his false religiosity. Recall Story’s Third Law: ‘Sooner or later all operations and covers are BLOWN’.

WANTA’S ‘REAGAN’S JUNK-YARD DOG’ DIVERSION
Wanta told Claire Sterling, the late author of Thieves’ World [published by the CIA’s favourite book publisher, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1994], and also reconfirmed personally to the Editor of this service, that President Reagan used to refer to Wanta as his ‘junkyard dog’.

He told the Editor that George Bush Sr. was ‘never in the room when Ronald Reagan briefed me’. This statement conflicts with the reality, which has been emphatically reconfirmed to this Editor from ‘inside’ sources, that Wanta was indeed the courier between George Bush Senior and Mikhail Gorbachëv (who are, as indicated, joint partners with Dr Helmut Kohl and Dr Joseph Ackermann in Barrington Investment Group, now Deutsche AG, St Gallen, Switzerland: see above etc.).

So it transpires that Wanta systematically lies and lied to his contacts, including the Editor of this service, whose platform and expertise he exploited to provide a smokescreen behind which the Bush-CIA-DVD racketeers, which Wanta served, could continue unimpeded under the crook Henry M. Paulson’s supervision from the US Treasury.

• We did wonder why we encountered no interference from the highest US level for the first year while Wanta was using us in the manner described.

WANTA KNEW ABOUT 9/11 IN ADVANCE, LIKE VREELAND
Wanta was released from jail just over a week after 9/11, was collected from prison by Gerald Salchert, of Austrian extraction, and taken to a relative’s house in Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin. Because of his experiences at the hands of the Bush-Clinton Crime Syndicate (given that these mentally deranged capos always treat their underlings with cruelty), there was concern that his prior knowledge of the 9/11 abomination might be leaked prior to the event – which is in fact what the Office of Naval Intelligence and prospective/actual assassin, Lt. Mark Delmart Vreeland, did from jail in Toronto, after he had opened three diplomatic bags, which is treason.

In March 2005, the Pentagon-associated US operative nicknamed ‘The Visitor’, calling himself Walker whose real name is Demchuk, who pestered the Editor for information about the Soviet-originated Iraqi WMD-removal (‘Sarindar’) programme, informed the Editor that ‘Vreeland is in solitary confinement for a very long time, his case has been sealed and he is no longer a threat to you’ (Vreeland having threatened the Editor with death in 2003). Vreeland’s parole board meeting has been pencilled in for a date in 2163, according to an informed US source.

FRANCE COVERS FOR GERMANY UNDER TREATY OF THE ELYSEE
Under the Treaty of the Elysée dated January 1963, which is of indefinite duration, France and Germany are both required to coordinate their stances on all external matters, on which they are required to ‘reach an analogous position’. France is therefore indistinguishable from Germany in respect of international strategic deception operations (especially as there are special intelligence collaboration provisions under the Treaty), and accordingly fronts extensively for Germany.

In this particular context, it provides flimsy (and disintegrating, or disintegrated) cover for the Abwehr operative, Leo Wanta, who was indeed the courier between George H. W. Bush Sr. and Mikhail Gorbachev [see our report dated 4th February 2010]. Although he says he’s Polish, we think this felon and fraudster may be a DVD operative/double agent, possibly STASI.

The German Chancellor, Angela Merkel – formerly the Secretary of the Agitation and Propaganda Department of the Communist Yugend at Marx-Lenin University, East Berlin – is a STASI operative.

FRAUDULENT WANTA ‘SNAKE HILL’ WEBSITE’S GERMAN CONNECTIONS
Further research has revealed a direct German connection with the clumsy ‘Principality of Snake Hill’ deception, which we have demolished, not least with the imprimatur of Ms Brenda Farrell, an official at the Australian Embassy in Dublin, who replied to our Irish associate’s enquiry as follows:

Forwarded message
From: <richardsharpe@eircom.net>
Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:25 PM
Subject: Fwd: Principality of Snake Hill [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
To: mrrichardsharpe <mrrichardsharpe@gmail.com>

richardsharpe@eircom.net wrote:
Many thanks for your timely response.

Regards
Richard

“Austremb Dublin” <Austremb.Dublin@dfat.gov.au> wrote:

Dear Mr Sharpe,

Thank you for your email.

There is no principality in Australia.

Kind regards

Australian Embassy
Dublin
Tel: +353 (0) 1 664 5300
Fax: +353 (0) 1 678 5185

richardsharpe@eircom.net

The German connection exposed herewith below, reveals the low calibre of these operatives, whose arrogance and certainty that they will never be exposed, is such that they don’t put much expertise into their deception operations if they can help it. A sane person would have thought that in ‘designing’ the ‘Principality of Snake Hill’ deception, they would have used some common sense and established an actual domain name, rather than using freeware sites.

One of the ‘Snake Hill’ websites
[http://members.multimania.co.uk/snakehill/]
causes computers to display a warning [viewable at: http://safeweb.norton.com/report/show?url=multimania.co.uk].

That warning is really for the entire ‘Multimania.co.uk’ domain, not just the fake ‘/snakehill’ subset. But it is interesting, to put it mildly, to note that the website’s location is: GERMANY. Why would a GERMAN site use a United Kingdom domain identifier?

• ESPECIALLY on a site noted for hosting THOUSANDS of Trojan threats: except that the answer presents itself immediately: it’s a DVD operation.

Yes, the entire website is HOSTED IN GERMANY, so Wanta’s ‘/snakehill’ subdirectory on this domain absolutely emanates from GERMANY as well. The following is the actual Whois Internet registration data (fully available at http://who.is/whois/multimania.co.uk/):

IP: 213.131.252.254
IP Location: Dusseldorf*, Germany

*Note: Wanta’s lawyer, Steve Goodwin, was born in Dusseldorf.

Domain name: multimania.co.uk

Registrant: conversis GmbH

Registrant type: Unknown

Registrant’s address: Patrick Kirchhoff, Erftstrasse 11, Duisburg 47051, Germany

Registrar: InterNetWire Communications GmbH [Tag = INTERNETWIRE-DE]
URL: http://www.internetwire.de

Relevant dates: Registered on: 12-Feb-2009
Renewal date: 12-Feb-2011
Last updated: 23-Apr-2009

Registration status: Registered until renewal date.

Name servers: ns1.conversis.de; ns2.conversis.de

WHOIS lookup made at 02:44:25 27-Feb-2010

As you can now start to see, our original assessment that the United States and Britain are in thrall to the GERMAN enemy that they never defeated, which we have maintained without deviation ever since those ‘gasps’ emitted by eavesdroppers during a telephone call several years ago made by the Editor to Wanta (joined by his former lawyer, Thomas Henry or Heinrich, a.k.a. Mr ‘Nasty’) is being confirmed by more and more evidence that is accumulating all the time.

In addition to using the French as a convenient, permanent front for their continuing hegemony operations, the pan-German Nazi long-range strategic deception heirs of the Abwehr, Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD), collaborate with the covert Soviets (Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU), and the KGB/FSB, in formulating, implementing and consolidating their comprehensive, failing revolutionary hegemony operations against the Main Enemy (Britain and the United States).

• That’s quite easy, since the heirs of the Abwehr and of Heinrich Himmler OWN THE CIA.

CIA/DVD PRACTICE OF EXPLOITING AND STEALING OUTSIDE EXPERTISE
Now it is standard CIA ‘tradecraft’ practice to usurp the expertise of outside professional talent if it is not available in-house or by some other means. In this context, the CIA perpetrators needed a US securities expert with impeccable credentials and a securities account. What the CIA does is apply its standard Bush-style ‘bait and switch’ technique, exploiting and maximising the potential of the usurped professional expertise, before rejecting it and stealing the assets associated with it.

Note that Wanta likewise used this Editor’s website and publishing platform in pursuing his own agendas for 15 months, telling Mr Cottrell in October 2007 that ‘we must get rid of Chris Story, but don’t tell him’. Mr Cottrell having formed his own view of Wanta’s unreliability, Teutonic arrogance and duplicity, carefully found a way to warn the Editor of this ‘switch’ in December 2007, without actually revealing what he could not then reveal.

In March 2008, Wanta fired Cottrell by issuing a vituperative three-page ‘Resolution of the Sole Shareholder’ (which is illegal, as corporate resolutions can only legally be issued by the Board at a Board Meeting: the text of this document used language familiar to the Editor of this service as having been written by Thomas Henry (‘Mr Nasty’)).

Relieved, Mr Cottrell then despatched the necessary resignation information to the tax authorities in Richmond, VA, requesting them to send all subsequent paperwork, including tax demands, to Wanta in Wisconsin – where he had long stated that he is not resident and does not run a business. The rest of this sequence can be gleaned from our website: see March 2008.

So what the cynical Intelligence Power routinely does is ‘borrow’ external expertise, before discarding or stealing it. In the Editor’s case, ‘bait and switch’ has worked both ways: it could be argued that we ourselves have done a ‘switch’, taking a leaf out of these deceivers’ book.

Meanwhile, the same happened to Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. Because the standard CIA procedure of exploiting, then stealing and discarding outside expertise and assets, also explains Wanta’s ‘use’ of Mr Cottrell for his failed AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. DVD stealing operation – because Michael C. Cottrell has the requisite securities market expertise and securities account facilities, which were (mistakenly) applied for the benefit of Mr Wanta’s AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. (but which cannot be used without Mr Cottrell’s signature: so we shall see whether it has again been stolen).

[Note: This analysis was written BEFORE the incredible fraud perpetrated via the State of Pennsylvania, subject of our separate report, was known. Quite prophetic, you may think].

Note also that Steven Goodwin, the Wanta Attorney in Richmond, VA, who accepted this Editor’s $35,000, which Wanta stole, was born, as stated previously, in Dusseldorf. Goodwin wrote the shifty loan documents which Leo Wanta demanded that the Editor sign forthwith, as soon as the Editor arrived on 10th June 2005 at his relative’s address in Chippewa Falls.

Wanta took it for granted that the Editor would meet his preremptory demand to sign, and wouldn’t walk out on the spot (which he nearly did).

[INSERTION: The Editor received an email on 9th March from a US correspondent who said he had asked Mr Wanta why he hadn’t paid the Editor’s loan plus interest back on the due date (or at all). Wanta replied that Mr Story had been ‘offered’ the choice of a ‘Biblical’ payment of ten times the orginal loan (no such ‘Biblical norm exists, by the way), or payment of the amount due on the due date. This is a fabrication. No such choice was ever offered: in any case it contains what is known as an ‘illusory promise’: see the securitisation analysis below. Another Wanta fabrication/slither].

THE AMERICAN INTELLIGENCE POWER WHICH HAS USURPED
THE GOVERNMENT DANCES TO THE TUNE OF FOREIGN POWERS
As for the stealing of Mr Cottrell’s contract and the electronic forging of his signature – a specific case of which we have detailed information [see above], which proves the ongoing racketeering collaboration between Bush, Gorbachëv and Kohl from the outset – it has been shown not only that Gorbachëv, Bush Sr., Helmut Kohl and Ackermann are handling stolen accruals (4) (the money that you make from stealing my money, is my money), but also that the US Intelligence Power dances to the tune of the foreign power whom George H. W. Bush represents, namely Germany – whom the Allies were supposed to have defeated in 1945.

Working closely at the intelligence level with the Nazi Continuum is the covert Soviet Continuum – both of which ‘Black’ Revolutionary Forces went underground: the Nazi (pan-German) Continuum went underground well before the defeat of Hitler, and the Soviet Continuum went underground in 1991, remaining under the supervision of ‘former’ President Gorbachëv, who, as indicated above, occupies a large suite of offices inside the Kremlin to this day.

As the Editor of Soviet Analyst, this Editor believes that GORBACHEV calls the shots – as he did from the moment this former Secretary of the CPSU Administrative Department came to power after the ‘festival of three funerals’ of abruptly deceased (murdered) Soviet leaders, in 1985.

We also believe that the concerted offensive to ‘take down’ the ‘Main Enemy’ (Britain and the United States) is the TWIN operation following on from the ‘takedown’ of the Soviet Union – and furthermore, that this massive operation is perpetrated by THE SAME TOP THREE OPERATIVES who ransacked the USSR: Gorbachëv, Bush Senior and Helmut Kohl.

WORLD REVOLUTION RACKETEERING OFFENSIVE
In other words, what we are exposing is a colossal World Revolution programme, from which these three racketeers and handlers of stolen monies have benefited and continue to benefit personally. [Well, they can’t be expected to run the World Revolution for altruistic motives, can they].

The extent to which Metabridge (Mossad, DVD, CIA and MI-6) is implicated in this gigantic anti-nation state World Revolution operation will quite probably be exposed when it transpires whether or not the two high-level MI-6 officers in the United States who were reported to us to be holding The Queen’s signature authority for the Settlements and her hijacked loan funds, may be double-crossing the Monarch. Given that everyone appears to have been double-crossing everyone else, anything is possible and nothing can be taken for granted: the Pennsylvania episode lends support to our suspicions on this score.

The Allies defeated Herr Adolf Schickelgrüber (Hitler), NOT Germany. On the contrary, assisted by the absorption by and penetration of the CIA by multiple ‘rehabilitated’ Nazis thanks to that ‘reverse takeover’ masterminded in the 1940s with treacherous US State Department connivance inter alia by General Reinhard Gehlen – the thuggish Abwehr Nazi intelligence chief who had overseen the repression in the German-occupied areas of the Soviet Union – the CIA became the main ‘active’ component of the Nazi Continuum. This accounts for its hideous Himmlerian abominations over the years, its satanic experimentation operations, its ‘Black’ offensives against the American people and the Rest of the World, its Nazi-type military aggressiveness and its repulsive arrogance, its absolute disdain of and hatred for the Rule of Law, and the reality that it is much more dangerous nowadays than the KGB-GRU ever was.

So what we are actually confronting is indeed the Nazi Continuum, secretly supported as always by (covert) Soviet Communism – the US component of which, at the present time, is headed by Leon Panetta. This Director of Central Intelligence, who controls the White House, was reported to the Editor of this service to be STILL blocking the Settlements as of 5th March 2010.

But even as we were being told this, something interesting happened behind the scenes. Which brings us to the real nub of the matter.

‘WALKING IN A STRAIGHT LINE’ WILL EXPOSE THE DECEPTIONS
The struggle that has been raging behind these scenes within and close to the DC Beltway reflects:

• A corrupt and criminal official determination to frustrate the Bank for International Settlements’ instructions (‘Line Item’) designating the conduct of the necessary and overdue G-7-approved on-balance sheet, fully taxable and transparent PRIVATE SECTOR Refunding of the US Dollar to Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., who, we were informed by US ‘inside’ sources (who will be exposed if this turns out to be false) is regarded by personnel working for The Queen as the only expert who can be trusted with this task.

• If none of this is true, the preceding report, containing a letter from Mr A. Clifton Hodges to the Editor of this service for onward delivery (which was implemented) to Buckingham Palace, was intended to expose the deception and those engaged perpetrating it (whose names we know, if they are so engaged, and who will be exposed along with the other deceivers, should a deception have been perpetrated. In accordance with our policy of ‘walking in a straight line’, we continue to assume that this is not the case: but we shall see).

• What certainly IS known is that the foregoing background has been used – in a similar manner as the Leo Wanta cover involving this Editor was exploited – to provide ‘smokescreen’ cover for an operation which might (in this context) supposedly enable the criminal perpetrators to conduct the Dollar Refunding themselves, for their own illicit profit, using FRNs, not US Treasury dollars.

In other words, the perpetrators have remained hell-bent on blocking the will of the international financial community as expressed via the BIS refunding ‘Line-Item’ instructions, given their horror at the prospect of losing control – and have illegally frustrated the intended use of the $6.2 trillion loan funds provided on 19th-20th July 2007 via the Bank of England under levy to six US money center banks, via the Bank of New York Mellon (as it became, effective July 2007).

COTTRELL THREATENS TO SNATCH AWAY THE RACKETEERS’ COVER,
THROWING THEM INTO A MAD PANIC. THIS WAS NOT ANTICIPATED.
On Friday 5th March, in telephone conversations, including one with the Editor of this service, attended by every despicable intelligence eavesdropper under the sun, Michael Cottrell stated unequivocally that if the $6.2 trillion refunding loan, as pre-agreed, is withheld from Mr Cottrell’s firm, Pennsylvania Investments Inc., he will walk away.

This statement evidently caused panic and a hurried strategic deception rethink inside the Beltway and in the other dark corners of the US criminal universe in question – more or less proving that, as with the Wanta operation which exploited both Mr Cottrell’s securities market expertise and this Editor’s publishing and publicity abilities and qualifications, the perpetrators had been using Mr Cottrell as cover for an intended deviation from the agreed-upon Basel instructions.

• The pending Pennsylvania Fraud exposure will PROVE THAT THIS ASSESSMENT IS CORRECT.

• The intention is for the proceeds of racketeering operations to be channelled inter alia into the hands of the partners of Deutsche AG, St Gallen, Switzerland.

And as indicated above, we know precisely who is behind this typical piece of CIA/DVD duplicity: and if it continues, they will be exposed by name. But, as always happens with these investigations, THIS OPERATION HAS ALREADY BEEN BLOWN. And it has been ‘blown’ because, whereas we have been walking ‘in a straight line’, the snakes are incapable of doing anything but slithering.

THE TWO MI-6 OPERATIVES WITH THE QUEEN’S SIGNATURE:
ARE THEY WORKING FOR, OR ARE THEY DOUBLE-CROSSING THE QUEEN?
It now has to be stated that if the two MI-6 operatives said to be carrying The Queen’s signature authority are or have been double-crossing Her Majesty, we will get to the bottom of that, as well, and will expose them, also. After all, we were able to expose the false assertion by the US ‘inside’ sources that Roy Grantham is a Representative of The Queen, when we asked Grantham to get in touch with us via this website. Although Grantham lives just a couple of miles from the Editor’s office, he saw fit to instruct a firm of ‘heavies’, based in Shreveport, LA, to issue a blatant threat by email against the Editor of this service.

• This ‘investigator’ said that Grantham would not be contacting the Editor of this service in view of his interest in preserving his ‘Stellar’ [note the geomasonic language] reputation.

Beyond this, it now has to be said that if the British Monarchical Power does not INSIST upon the agreed-upon Group of Seven-approved, private sector-based transparent, taxed Dollar Refunding operation proceeding precisely as specified by Basel, and is prepared to put up valuable assets in exchange for worthless Federal Reserve Notes, the Monarchy will self-destruct – WHICH IT IS THE OBJECTIVE OF THE PAN-GERMAN ENEMY TO PROCURE, since the British Monarchy stands in the way of the comprehensive realisation of Germany’s insidious and now collapsing ‘Europe from the Atlantic to the Urals/Vladivostok’ hegemony plans.

WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THE CHINESE CURRENCY BOXES?
The same applies to the Chinese. What happened to the Chinese currency boxes which were made available SPECIFICALLY to provide backing for the Treasury dollar? Are the Chinese also stupidly risking their assets in exchange for worthless FRNs, as well – notwithstanding their knowledge that the US officials in charge are racketeers, and in spite of the still undischarged lien for $47 trillion against the US Treasury imposed on or about 6th December 2009?

GREEK DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER EQUATES NAZI GERMANY
WITH CHANCELLOR MERKEL’S STASI GERMANY
It is certainly true that the catastrophic (and soon to become even more catastrophic) European project is on the verge of self-destruction, too. In late February 2010, in an interview with the BBC, the Greek Deputy Prime Minister accused NAZI GERMANY – clearly eliding Nazi Germany with the current German STASI régime – of ‘taking away the gold that was in the Bank of Greece, and they never gave it back. They shouldn’t complain so much about stealing and not being very specific about [their] economic dealings’.

• In other words; WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT, FRAU MERKEL?

• The fact that Greece and Germany have since been in discussions, does NOT expunge the Greek Deputy Prime Minister’s pointed observation from the record.

As previously reviewed, Greece’s massive toxic debt was accumulated under the preceding Greek Government as a consequence of Fraudulent Finance and racketeering operations with associates of the Bush/CIA/DVD Crime Syndicate via Citibank Athens, as we originally revealed a long time ago.
Far from being the weak partner, therefore, Greece is in fact in a position to DESTROY the entire poisonous pan-German hegemony operation, and in our opinion may well wind up doing so – as will similar situations waiting to explode among the PIGS (VIZ. Portugal, Italy (Greece) and Spain, which ought to read PIIGS, since Ireland is in the same position. A country with a huge trade surplus and a colossal current account deficit is in SERIOUS TROUBLE.

Uncoincidentally, each of these countries, as well as Iceland and the corrupted United Kingdom itself, has provided Fraudulent Finance ‘counterparty racketeering services’ to elements and associates of the Bush-CIA/DVD Crime Syndicate – with accruals doubtless pouring into Deutsche AG, St Gallen, for the benefit of Bush Senior, Gorbachëv (Orbach), Kohl and Ackermann.

WHAT DO THE FOUR RACKETEERS HAVE IN COMMON
WITH OTHER WELL-KNOWN DECEASED AND LIVING OPERATIVES?
What do these four racketeers have in common with the following deceased and living revolutionary operatives?

Andropov, Yuri (Lieberman)
Barroso, José Manuel
Biden, Joseph
Brown, Gordon
Bush Jr., George W.
Bush Sr., George H. W.
Clinton, Hillary Rodomski
Clinton, William Jefferson (Rockefeller)
Dodd, Senator Christopher
Emanuel, Rahm
Farage, Nigel
Geithner, Timothy
Grossart, Sir Angus
Khrushchev, Nikita (Perlmutter)
Medvedev (Menakhem Aaronovich Mendel)
Panetta, Leon
Paulson, Henry M.
Putin, Vladimir Vladimirovich (Shalomov)
Salmond, Alex
Sarkozy, Nicolas
Schickelgrüber, Adolf (Hitler)
Stalin, Josef (Djiugashvili-Kochba)?

FORECLOSURE ANALYSIS’ PARA-LEGAL SERVICES SPRINGING UP IN THE UNITED STATES
We turn now to the central issue: that securitisation is illegal under US law and indeed in all Common Law jurisdictions. There are NO REDEEMING FEATURES.

Services are now springing up in the United States providing a ‘Foreclosure Autopsy’ assessment in which breaks in the chain of title, missing assignments, unlawful substitution of trustees and blatant fraud and forgery, is typically identified. Such services do not provide actual legal advice: what they do is offer recorded information in support of any planned evidentiary hearing or legal discovery going all the way back to the original creditor/depositor. Every recorded document can be identified and surfaced for distressed homeowners – representing a broad foreclosure analysis resource support system via reliable established networks, local title companies, county recorders and other parties, especially in non-judicial foreclosure states like California, Arizona and Nevada, which appear to be states in the greatest need – given that it has been predicted that some 3.4 million foreclosures are anticipated across the United States over the rest of this calendar year (see Note 5 below for more background to this ‘utter corruption’).

NORTHERN ROCK’S LIES TO A FORMER MORTGAGOR MASKING
THE FACT THAT HER TITLE DEEDS WERE ‘OTHERWISE ENGAGED’
In Britain, we have been engaged with a householder who paid off her mortgage with Northern Rock in June 2004. In exchange, Northern Rock informed the lady that they would be forwarding her Title (Lease) documents, but failed to do so for five years – proffering every excuse under the sun for their gross failure, including the statement that her title documents had been ‘dematerialised’ – before, all of a sudden, forwarding her missing documents under cover of a letter saying that ‘it has come to our notice that we did not return your Title Documents in June 2004. Here they are. Please keep them in a safe place’.

• This occurred in June 2009, after the householder had torn her hair out, metaphorically speaking, for five long years trying to extract her documents from this reprobate lender.

In this instance, it is likely that, given that Northern Rock had had to be taken over by the British Government (since Gordon Brown was terrified at the media coverage of long lines of customers outside Northern Rock branches seeking to retrieve their savings, as in Argentina), the British Government’s lawyers may well have instructed Northern Rock to disgorge the said householder’s documents, which may have been encumbered by incorporation within a securitisation package.

The lady accepted a ‘compensation’ payment of £150 brokered by the Financial Ombudsman (which seems to exist to protect recalcitrant financial institutions operating within the British jurisdiction from determined ladies like this householder who will not take prevarication for an answer), on the basis of blatantly fraudulent information (e.g. that her title documents had been ‘dematerialised’ – a false statement placed in writing by Northern Rock).

We have comprehensively deconstructed this Northern Rock case, with facsimiles of the relevant correspondence, in the forthcoming huge issue of International Currency Review (6), indicating that Northern Rock lied to the householder, who was accordingly subjected to five years of anxiety and was unable to exercise her right to move home at any time during those five years.

• UPDATE: The householder wrote many days ago to Northern Rock asking them to answer her question, YES or NO: were her Title Deeds assigned and incorporated in a securitisation package without her permission? As of this date [11th March], THERE HAS BEEN NO RESPONSE. This is because they can’t answer the question without re-incriminating themselves. They have lied in writing already, so they have a major problem: as does the British Government, as the bank is controlled by the Government. We’ll see where the serpents in question slither and writhe to.

• MORTGAGE DECEPTION IN SPAIN: This morning [11th March], we received an email from a UK correspondent who writes: ‘I have a house in Spain, with a mortgage attached to it from Banco do Valencia’. Three years ago, the lady in question sought specific answers to her questions about prospective changes to the conditions of the mortgage. The bank failed to respond at all.

Moreover even after she complained to the bank’s Head Offfice, enclosing all the correspondence, there was no reply. Some time later the bank branch manager admitted to the lady that the changes that she requested could not be implemented BECAUSE THE MORTGAGE HAD BEEN ‘SOLD’ ON TO ANOTHER COMPANY. But of course the Spanish bank refused to provide any details of the company in question, let alone guidance on how they could be contacted. This revealed that, as in the cited Northern Rock case, Banco do Valencia are hiding something.

Our correspondent states: ‘So I pay my monthly mortgage to Banco do Valencia without having a clue who really owns that debt or who I am ultimately paying. This chimes with your Northern Rock exposure. Keep up the good work’.

• Two points: (1): NEVER DO BUSINESS IN SPAIN. They will always deceive and double-cross you. And: (2): The fact that Britain and Spain are satrap states caught in the European Union Collective entrapment net MAKES NO DIFFERENCE. Sheisters are sheisters, no matter what the regime.

• AND A VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE PROFESSIONAL UK CORRESPONDENT ADDS [11th March]:
‘From my own experience of finance companies’ ‘lawlessness’, they never back down even when shown that their actions are illegal or contracts unenforceable; and the standard ploy is not to answer letters… In psychological terms, this shows that they are extremely afraid, beneath the superficial impression of arrogance that they display. Their power, therefore, is an illusion’.

• Editor’s add-on: With the Northern Rock test case, we can assure you that there will be no let-up as they have been caught lying to the former mortgagor IN WRITING and there’s not a lot they can do to retrieve their situation. No doubt the Government’s lawyers will be forced to intervene.

SECURITISATION IS A KEY ELEMENT OF A REVOLUTIONARY ATTACK ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
When you consider that, as will now be rehearsed, securitisation is completely illegal under US and Common Law, you can see not only that these criminal enterprise financial institutions are well and truly on the wrack, but also WHY there has been such intense and ruthless ongoing RESISTANCE to the exposure of this rampant dirty racketeering activity – which represents nothing less than an intentional, sustained and suitably ‘below the radar’ offensive by the manipulators of the World Revolution against private property – being micromanaged in parallel with the so-called ‘sexual revolution’ and ‘upside down’ outpouring of every form of reprobate behaviour and perverted sex which is aimed at destroying the family, regarded by these long-range geomasonic maniacs as the glue which ‘legitimises’ private property.

Even if a jaded observer has zero knowledge of the progress of the World Revolution, which has reached an advanced (and yet fragile) stage in our era, the relentlessly comprehensive spread and coverage of the racketeering and corruption being perpetrated against private home owners can easily be seen to be ‘no accident’. As with ALL dimensions of the World Revolution, one has to ask oneself: how come that this nefarious, barbaric behaviour appeared suddenly and on such a truly colossal scale in every corner of the world almost simultaneously? None of this is coincidental: people who treat such developments as ‘phenomena’ without enquiring WHY these things are happening, are destined to languish in permanent ignorance of the truth.

YES, A RUTHLESS, SYSTEMATIC ATTACK ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
And the truth IS that what we are exposing is nothing less than a carefully planned, ruthless, determined and systematic revolutionary attack on private property.

• No wonder Gorbachëv sits, to this day, in a huge wing of the Kremlin, as before.

HE COLLABORATED WITH BUSH SENIOR to unleash this scourge on homeowners in the United States, Britain and the White Commonwealth countries – the ‘Main Enemy’, in collaboration with the covert Soviets’ intelligence allies, German ‘Black’ intelligence (DVD, DACHAU), hiding behind the front conveniently provided by the duplicitous French under the Treaty of the Elysée.

The criminal mentality seeks at all costs to entangle its targets in its own corruption, so that if anything goes wrong, the targeted parties are readily identifiable as racketeers, thereby providing the originating perpetrators with cover (so they imagine).

Hence the subversion through corruption of foreign counterparties – in Britain, Iceland, Greece, Italy, the Vatican, Spain, Portugal, Albania, North Korea, India, China, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Cyprus and wherever willing trading counterparties may be found.

LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR SCAMS STILL ‘OUT THERE’
That such Fraudulent Finance operations have continued as though there had been no historical discontinuity is of course well known. But a good deal of ‘scraping of the barrel’ is also taking place. Last year we drew attention to certain curious money-lending activities that were being fronted or sponsored by Newsmax.com which we were advised may be borderline financial scams.

The lowest racketeering common denominator we have ever come across, dated 2nd March 2010, from Cyprus – signed off by one Mr Ahmet Z. Altunis, ‘Principal Right Holder. World Wide Funding Trust’ seeks clients inter alia in the United States, to take advantage of their services for all ‘your unconventional funding needs’:

‘We give big opportunity to enter trade (PPP). If your assets SKRs (Safe-Keeping Receipts), Notes, Lease MTNS, Bond(s), IBOS, CMOS, have no available credit line now, we open credit line to your name. You can enter (PPP), your big profit [to] finance your project. We begin New Year contracts 2010: Enter Gateway to unlimited opportunities…. Send LOI + CIS + SKR + Passport. Then we open and activate credit line under YOUR NAME, even [though] the credit line is open on our name… Client have NO RISKS at 100%, all is secured by our and their lawyers, no tricks’.

When this crude solicitation written in barbaric English was sent to us from the United States, we were told that it represents a lowest common denominator fraud serving the Bush Crime Syndicate network. In due course, the client is asked for an up-front fee of between 12,800 and 15,000 Euros to cover ‘due diligence costs’, so it looks like a standard ‘Nigerian-type’ scam: but it isn’t.

Targets are being enticed into securitisation deals, which are illegal as indicated below, under US and Common Law. The solicitation sent to us (above) was being widely disseminated within the United States by US parties (wire fraud).

WHY SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. AND COMMON LAW
Securitisation is illegal under US legislation – primarily because it is fraudulent and causes specific violations of R.I.C.O., usury, Antitrust and bankruptcy laws. And it flies in the face of public policy in numerous ways, as is expounded in extensive detail in an analysis to be published in our journal Economic Intelligence Review 2009Q1 (7) with several pages of book, article and case references.

To begin with, securitisation violates US State usury legislation. Secondly, all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ as well as ‘assignment’ securitisations are essentially tax evasion schemes, and the penalties for tax evasion in the United States are excessively severe.

Thirdly, in all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations, the conflict of interest inherent in the sponsor also serving as the servicer constitutes fraud and conversion. In the fourth place, in all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations where the Special Purpose Vehicle [SPV] is a trust, the declaration of trust is void, as it exists for an illegal purpose.

In the fifth place, off-balance sheet treatment of asset-backed securities (both for ‘true-sale’ and for assignment transactions) constitutes fraud.

Sixth, all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations involve blatant fraudulent conveyances. In the seventh place, securitisation usurps United States bankruptcy laws and is accordingly illegal, as well as being also demonstrably contrary to public policy.

SECURITISATION ENTAILS GROSS VIOLATIONS OF R.I.C.O. STATUTES
In ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations, there are fraudulent transactions which serve as ‘predicate acts’ under US Federal R.I.C.O. statutes.

The specific R.I.C.O. sections are: Section 1341 (mail fraud); Section 1343 (wire fraud); Section 1344 (financial institution fraud); Section 1957 (engaging in monetary transactions improperly derived from specified unlawful activity) [‘the money you make from the illegal exploitation of my money, is my money’]; and Section 1952 (racketeering).

Furthermore, securitisation constitutes violations of American antitrust statutes through market integration, syndicate collusion, price formation, vertical foreclosure, tying, price-fixing, predatory pricing, and the rigging of allocations.

Securitisation also involves void contracts, given the lack of consideration, illusory promises, the absence of any actual bargain, the absence of mutuality – and finally illegal subject matter and the contravention of public policy.

Securitisation is riddled with Fraudulent Transfer, Fraud in the Inducement, Fraud in Fact by Deceit, Theft by Deception (Fraudulent Concealment) and Fraudulent Conveyance: see the US securities regulations routinely breached in such activity, listed at the foot of this report and of most of these reports for THE PAST THREE YEARS, and other laws also routinely flouted in this context.

NOTWITHSTANDING THAT IT’S ILLEGAL, U.S. AUTHORITIES
CONTINUE TO PROMOTE AND ENCOURAGE SECURITISATION
Yet notwithstanding such crystal-clear indications that securitisation is 100% ILLEGAL under US Law, as well as under Common Law generally (so that these findings are largely applicable in all Common Law countries), US authorities from the highest level downwards, financial institutions, intermediaries, Intelligence Power operatives and others are gearing up for what they doubtless hope will be intensified racketeering and trading activity with (corrupt) foreign counterparties.

This behaviour is being fine-tuned ‘as we speak’, despite the reality that the securitisation activity being planned and implemented violates innumerable US statutes in the manner we summarise above, and notwithstanding that such activity is contrary to public policy.

Indeed, it’s as though the Rule of Law did not exist. From the highest level of the US Treasury, the White House, the US State Department and the Central Intelligence Agency and its subsidiaries such as the lethal Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), the mindset, intention and perverse primary objective has all along been to resume Fraudulent Finance based on securitisation, as quickly and as seamlessly as possible. No wonder the five criminal Presidents DEMANDED immunity from prosecution from the World Court: did they arrange for key Justices (starting with the American Justice) at the World Court to receive pecuniary reward for granting them their demand?

SUMMARY FORENSIC ANALYSIS PROVING THE ILLEGALITY OF SECURITISATION
From whichever angle securitisation is considered, it is ILLEGAL. For example, the contracts are themselves VOID. This is because the process of securitisation involves several contracts that are either signed simultaneously, or within a short timeframe – many of which are rendered void inter alia because there is no consideration in contracts used in effecting the securitisations.

Many such contracts involve unilateral executory undertakings containing illusory promises. A unilateral executory promise is not a consideration. Such promises typically include a promise made by the Special Purpose Vehicle to pay out periodic interest, whether contingent or non-contingent on whether the collateral pays cash interest.

Collateral-substitution agreements contain a promise whereby the sponsor agrees to substitute impaired collateral. An assignment agreement of future (not yet existing) collateral may well be deemed a unilateral executory promise by the sponsor.

Illusory promises are not valid consideration for a contract. Such promises may be found in the Subscription/Purchase Agreement, whereby an existing asset is being exchanged for a future asset that does not exist as of the date of the subscription/purchase agreement. To make matters worse, none of the agreements typically signed by the investor as part of his/her purchase of the Special Purpose Vehicle’s Asset-Backed Securities expressly incorporates the (typically illusory) promises embodied in the offering prospectus.

OR: The Special Purpose Vehicle’s promise to pay interest and/or dividends on Asset-Backed Securities ‘Interest-Onlys’, Preferreds and ‘Pincipal-Onlys’ are essentially illusory promises because the underlying collateral may not produce any cash flows at all: so there won’t be any interest/dividend payments.

Moreover the lack of mutuality characterising such contracts renders them null and void, by definition. In any such contract, each party must have firm control of the subject matter of the contract and the underlying assets (consideration), and there MUST be a direct contractual relationship between the parties concerned.

But this is not the case, especially as the Special Purpose Vehicle’s corporate documents (trust indentures or bylaws or articles of incorporation) may typically limit the right of each Asset-Back Security investor; while there is typically no mutuality at all between the Special Purpose Vehicle and the sponsor/originator, because both entities are essentially the same, and are controlled by the sponsor before and after the securitisation takes place.

SECURITISATION: A COVER FOR TAX EVASION
In addition to their multiple violations of American State usury laws, all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment securitisations’ are essentially tax evasion arrangements. In the United States, the applicable tax evasion statute is the US Internal Revenue Code Section 7201 7 which reads: “Any person who willfully attempts in any manner to evade or defeat any tax imposed by this title or the payment thereof shall, in addition to other penalties provided by law, be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $100,000 ($500,000 in the case of a corporation), or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution”.

Under this statute and related case law, prosecutors must prove three elements beyond any reasonable doubt:

(1): The actus reus (the guilty conduct) – which consists of an affirmative act (not merely an omission or failure to act) that constitutes evasion or an attempt to evade either: (a) the assessment of a tax or (b) the payment of a tax.

(2): The mens rea or “mental” element of willfulness – the specific intent to violate an actually known legal duty. In the case of ‘true sale’ transactions, the tax evasion occurs because:

(a): The sponsor determines the price at which the collateral is transferred to the SPV, and hence, can arbitrarily lower/increase the price to avoid capital gains taxes – it being assumed here that the sponsor is a profit-maximising entity and will always act to minimise its tax liability and to avoid any tax assessment;

(b): The sponsor typically retains a ‘residual’ interest in the SPV in the form of IOs, POs and “junior piece”, which are typically taxed differently and on a different tax-basis compared with the original collateral: hence, the sponsor can lower the price of the collateral upon transfer to the SPV, and convert what would have been capital gains, into a non-taxable basis in the SPV “residual”;

(c): There is typically the requisite “intent” by the sponsor – evidenced by the arrangement of the transaction and the transfer of assets to the Special Purpose Vehicle;

(d): Before securitisation, collateral is typically reported in the sponsors’ financial statements at book value (that is, lower-of-cost-or-market: under both the US and the international accounting standards, loans and accounts receivable are typically not re-valued to market-value unless there has been some major impairment in value) which does not reflect true Market Values, and results in effective tax evasion on transfer of the collateral to the SPV, as any unrealised gain is not taxed;

(e): The actus reus is manifested by the execution of the securitisation transaction and transfer of assets to the SPV;

(f): The mens rea or specific intent is manifested by the elaborate arrangements implicit in securitisation transactions, the method of determination of the price of the collateral to be transferred to the SPV, the aims of securitisation, and the sponsor’s transfer of assets to the SPV;

(g): The unpaid tax liability consists of foregone tax on the capital gains from the collateral (the transaction is structured to avoid recognition of capital gains), and tax on any income from the collateral which is ‘converted’ into basis or other non-taxable forms;

(h): Income (from the collateral) that would have been taxable in the sponsor’s own financial statements, is converted into non-taxable basis in the form of the SPV’s Interest-Only (IO) and Principal-Only (PO) securities: part of the Interest-Spread (the difference between the SPV’s income and what it pays as interest and operating costs) is paid out to PO-holders, and this transforms interest into return-of-capital or just capital repayment, with no tax consequences. [Leaving aside the Ponzi scam dimension here – Ed.].

In cases of ‘disguised loan’ or ‘assignment’ securitisation transactions, tax evasion occurs:
(a): Because the sponsor determines the price at which the collateral is transferred to the SPV, and hence can lower/increase the price of the collateral to avoid capital gains taxes;

(b): Because the sponsor typically retains a ‘residual’ interest in the SPV which is normally taxed differently and on a different tax-basis compared to the original collateral: hence, the sponsor can lower the price upon transfer to the SPV, and convert what would have been capital gains, into non-taxable basis for tax purposes;

(c): Because the transfer of collateral to the SPV and the creation of Interest-Only and Principal-Only securities converts what would have been taxable capital gains into non-taxable basis;

(d): Because gain in the value of the collateral is not recognised for tax purposes, because there has not been any ‘sale’;

(e): Where the ABS is partly amortising, any capital gains are converted into interest payments;

(f): Because actus reus is manifested by the execution of the securitisation transaction and transfer of assets to the SPV;

(g): Because the mens rea or specific intent is manifested by the elaborate arrangements implicit in securitisation transactions, the objectives of securitisation and the sponsor’s transfer of assets to the Special Purpose Vehicle;

(h): Because the unpaid tax liability consists of tax on the capital gains from the transfer of the collateral (the transaction is structured to avoid recognition of a sale, whereas the transfer to the Special Purpose Vehicle is effectively a sale), and tax on any income from the collateral which is ‘converted’ into basis or other non-taxable forms, by securitisation.

SECURITISATION VIOLATES THE U.S BANKRUPTCY CODE
AND THEREFORE ALSO CONTRAVENES PUBLIC POLICY
Any transfer or conveyance of the assets of a debtor that is deemed to be made for the purposes of hindering, delaying or defrauding actual or potential creditors, may be determined by Courts to be a Fraudulent Conveyance under Section 548 of the US Bankruptcy Code or under a relevant theory of Constructive Fraud.

Although each US State has its own laws regarding the appropriate elements of proof of Constructive Fraud, Section 548(a)(2) of the US Bankruptcy Code permits an inference of Constructive Fraud if the following factors exist:

(1): The debtor received less than reasonably equivalent value for the property transferred; and:

(2): The debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the transfer, or else retained unreasonably small capital after the transfer, or made the transfer with the intent or belief that it would incur debts beyond its ability to pay.

The following theories of Fraudulent Conveyance within the context of securitisation may apply:

• Where the sponsor/originator receives insufficient value for assets transferred.

• Where there is an ‘intent to hinder, delay or defraud’ creditors (representing an implicit pre-petition waiver of one’s right to file for bankruptcy), with regard to the originator’s transfer of assets to the SPV, or the originator’s transfer of assets to the SPV has clearly not been undertaken on an arms’-length basis.

• Where securitisation increases the originator’s bankruptcy risk; and:

• In all instances where securitisation usurps the United States’ bankruptcy laws and is therefore illegal on such a basis alone.

SECURITISATION VIOLATES FEDERAL R.I.C.O. STATUTES
Turning now to the reality that securitisation constitutes a violation of US Federal R.I.C.O. Statutes [see Legal Notes below], we can state without equivocation that the entire securitisation process constitutes violations of Federal R.I.C.O. statutes, because:

(1): There is the requisite criminal or civil ‘enterprise’ – consisting of the sponsor/issuer, the trustees and the intermediary bank. These three parties work closely together to effect the securitisation transaction.

(2): There are ‘predicate acts’ of:

(a): Mail fraud – using the mails for sending out materials among themselves and to investors.

(b): Wire fraud – using wires to engage in fraud by communicating with investors.

( c): Conversion – where there isn’t proper title to collateral.

(d): Deceit: misrepresentation of issues and facts pertaining to the securitisation transaction.

(e): Securities fraud: disclosure issues.

(f): It entails loss of profit opportunity.

(g): It involves the making of false statements and or misleading representations
about the value of the collateral.

(h): It entails stripping the originator/issuer of the ability to pay debt claims or judgment claims in bankruptcy court – a state of affairs that may apply where the sponsor is financially distressed and the cash proceeds of the transaction are significantly less than the value of the collateral.

There is also typically the requisite ‘intent’ by members of the enterprise – evident in knowledge (actual and inferable), acts, omissions, purpose (actual and inferable) and results. Intent can be reasonably inferred from:

(a): The existence of a sponsor that seeks to raise capital – and cannot raise capital on better terms by other means;

(b): The participation of an investment bank that has very strong incentives to consummate the transaction on any agreeable (but not necessarily reasonable) terms.

SECURITISATION ALSO VIOLATES U.S. ANTITRUST LEGISLATION
Securitisation further constitutes violations of US Antitrust laws, because the American Asset-Backed Securities and Mortgage-Backed Securities markets are dominated by relatively few large entities such as FNMA (Fannie Mae), Freddie Mac, the top five investment banks (all of which have conduit programs), and the top five credit card issuers (MBNA, AMEX, Citigroup, etc.), etc.. As a consequence, the top five ABS/MBS issuers control more than 50% of the US ABS/MBS market. This constitutes illegal market concentration under US Antitrust legislation.

THE ‘PHILIPPINES EXCEPTION’ BURIED IN THE CLAYTON ACT
In the Antitrust context, however, observe the following text from the Clayton Act, which specifically EXCLUDES transactions undertaken with The Philippines. Isn’t that interesting?

It provides a blanket rationale for the massive past and ongoing US clandestine focus on The Philippines, the CIA’s need for ‘black hole’ conditions there in connection with successive US operations to relieve Presidents Marcos and Aquino of the stolen and hidden ‘Yamashita’s gold’, the US Fraudulent Finance operations using Philippine institutions and related operations based in that territory, an aborted US operation to convert The Philippines into a new US State (as had been planned under Clinton for Somalia), and the frequent visits of operatives known to ourselves to The Philippines under cover of attending to ‘orphanages’:

§ 1 Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 12 Definitions; short title:
(a) “Antitrust laws”, as used herein, includes the Act entitled:
‘An Act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies’, approved July second, eighteen hundred and ninety; sections seventy-three to seventy-seven, inclusive, of an Act entitled ‘An Act to reduce taxation, to provide revenue for the Government, and for other purposes’, of August 27th, eighteen hundred and ninety-four; an Act entitled ‘An Act to amend sections seventy-three and seventy-six of the Act of August twenty-seventh, eighteen hundred and ninetyfour’, entitled ‘An Act to reduce taxation, to provide revenue for the Government, and for other purposes’, approved February twelfth, nineteen hundred and thirteen; and also this Act.

‘Commerce’, as used herein, means trade or commerce among the several States and with foreign nations, or between the District of Columbia or any Territory of the United States and any State, Territory, or foreign nation, or between any insular possessions or other places that are under the jurisdiction of the United States, or between any such possession or place and any US State or Territory of the United States or the District of Columbia or any foreign nation, or within the District of Columbia or any Territory or any insular possession or other place under the jurisdiction of the United States:

Provided, That nothing in this Act contained shall apply to the Philippine Islands. The word ‘person’ or ‘persons’ wherever used in this Act shall be deemed to include corporations and associations existing under or authorized by the laws of either the United States, the laws of any of the Territories, the laws of any State, or the laws of any foreign country.

FANNIE MAE, FREDDIE MAC ENGAGED IN FURTHER ILLEGAL SECURITISATION:
RE-SECURITISING ALREADY SECURITISED ‘DUD’ ASSETS TO DUMP BACK ON THE BANKS
Even so, it became apparent in early March that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, both controlled by the US Government, are preparing to force financial enterprises such as the CIA’s Bank of America Corporation, JP Morgan Chase & Co, Wells Fargo and Citigroup, Inc., to buy back further waves of newly securitised packages of mortgages – i.e., the former Government-Sponsored Enterprises are reportedly engaged again in repackaging mortgage securities already marked down to ‘true’ value.

In other words, they are trying to dump faulty securitised loans, as well as straight loans, back on the participating banks – under cover of such fantasies as the double-minded statement attributed to Sharon McHale, spokes‘person’ for Freddie Mac, located adjacent to the CIA in McLean, Virginia, on 5th March 2010: ‘We are trying to be good stewards of taxpayer dollars and as part of that, it’s important that those dollars not go to loans that should not have been sold to us in the first place’ – throwing the blame for Freddie Mac’s own scandalous racketeering behaviour back at the banks.

• Being interpreted, what this woman was saying was: this:

‘We are covering ourselves with a mantle of rectitude by posing as protectors of the taxpayer’s dollars in order to obfuscate our own ongoing racketeering behaviour, even as we prepare further Fraudulent Finance securitisations in violation of the relevant US legislation: and we couldn’t care less because we are owned by the Government itself, which is up to its neck in such violations’.

And Paul Miller, a former examiner for the Federal Reserve (hardly a guarantee of integrity, given the Fed’s own reputation for Fraudulent Finance), based in Arlington, VA, let the cat out of the bag with: ‘If you want to originate mortgages and keep that pipeline running, you have to deal with the push-backs. It doesn’t matter how much you hate Fannie and Freddie’ – and neither, apparently, does it matter to what extent the Rule of Law is cynically violated ‘in order to keep the pipeline (of Fraudulent Finance) running’.

GARY GENSLER IS NOT AS OPPOSED TO FRAUDULENT FINANCE AS HE SEEMS
The appointment of Gary Gensler as Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission under President Obama was greeted with signs of relief on Wall Street. Here was a hardened former Goldman Sachs trader with 18 years’ experience with that cynical, ruthless money shop, who could be relied upon to act at all times in the interests of Wall Street, not the investor and taxpayer.

But, as has since been reported elsewhere, over a private lunch at the Waldorf Astoria in midtown Manhattan on 6th January 2010, the 52-year-old Gary Gensler caused indigestion among the self-satisfied guests at the luncheon – Timothy O’Hara, head of global credit at Crédit Suisse Holdings USA, Inc.; Robert P. Kelly, CEO at Bank of New York Mellon Corporation; David B. Heller, co-head of the securities division at Goldman Sachs; and Seth Waugh, CEO of Deutsche Bank Americas.

Because when one banker asked Gensler what or whom he saw as the biggest obstacles to reform in the securities and commodities sectors, he replied: ‘You’ (8).

Mr Gensler has been seeking derivatives control legislation that goes beyond current proposals, including what President Obama put forward during the summer of 2009. Notwithstanding the fact that if the derivatives situation is not addressed, the forthcoming crash will be so horrific as to be likely to tip the world into open, rather than covert, warfare, a certain Samuel Hayes, Professor Emeritus of Investment Banking at Harvard Business School, Boston, told Bloomberg in February 2010 that ‘Gensler is going to raise real concerns’ for financial firms.

‘Derivatives are absolutely central to what is Wall Street in the 21st century’ – namely, a casino. ‘Nobody wants the regulations to affect them’ (9).

‘GREATER TRANSPARENCY’ IS EVIDENTLY ALL HE‘S AFTER
On closer examination, Mr Gensler has actually been pushing for ‘more transparency’ in the over-the-counter derivatives market, so as to lower spreads between buyers and sellers and to make it easier for new competitors to enter the market – which the big banks aren’t keen on, as more participants will deprive them of profit.

So, Gary Gensler is not actually in the business of tackling the underlying crisis arising from the determination of financial institutions to continue playing Russian roulette, using the model first developed by the US Intelligence Power as it sought what it thought were foolproof methods of ensuring its financial independence from Congress and the open-ended funding pipelines that it considered appropriate to buttress its usurped status as a recalcitrant ‘State within the State’ impervious to reform and determined to brook no interference with its stolen hegemony.

INVESTORS’ MONEY USED TO REMUNERATE WALL STREET
In any case, the derivatives institutions and their back-up infrastructure have not the slightest intention of adopting any course other than ’business as usual‘ – and on a far larger scale than in the past. This obtuse madness WILL lead to a global collapse, as derivatives products are usually without real value. As a noted article in The New York Times of 7th February 2010 at last stated, investment banks trading derivatives do not own the mortgage bonds, the obligations from home owners, notes signed by home owners or the mortgage deeds of the deeds of trust.

The ‘structured products’, consisting of bundled documents ostensibly relating to the above but having NO RECOURSE to underlying real value, were, however, invested with ‘value’ arising from the name of the institution marketing the ‘asset’ – that is to say, arbitrary ‘value’ arising from the fact that, as a Goldman Sachs compliance officer actually admitted to the Editor of this service: ‘A structured product is worth what someone is prepared to pay for it’ – a penetrating statement which encapsulates the possibility that it may be (is) worthless: which is indeed the case.

‘THE MONEY YOU MAKE BY MISUSING MY MONEY IS MY MONEY’ – I.E., THE HOME OWNER’S
The money sloshing around between investment banks in this dirty market was investors’ money unwittingly advanced into pools of capital which winds up being used primarily to finance the fees, profits, insurance proceeds, insurance premia, and so forth – all for the benefit of Wall Street, paid to the investment banks, and not to investors who stumped up the money in the first place.

These fees and relationships are not and have never been disclosed to the home owner despite, in the United States, clear legislation requiring such transparency, including the Truth in Lending Act, and Deceptive Lending – which require full transparency and disclosure.

• Further legislation applicable to the securities sector in the United States is re-listed below – in the list that we have republished at the foot of our website reports for the past three years.

• The list of applicable securities regulations and laws is augmented by a legal tutorial which, again, we have published for the past three years at the foot of these reports,

It would appear that, notwithstanding such reminders, Wall Street and its compliant infrastructure, as well as its co-conspiring portfolio of dubious foreign trading counterparty institutions, has every intention of continuing to violate the relevant US rules and legislation – while at the same time continuing to abuse, in the mortgage sector, the home owner with the same cynicism as in the past.

Given the legal principle that ‘the money you make from misusing my money is my money’, it is quite clear that undisclosed fees, profits, kickbacks and other financial abuses perpetrated by these big speculative financial entities which produce no real wealth at all, but simply move money around between themselves, are payable to the home owner who signed the ‘loan’ papers in the first place.

A PERVERSE AND ARROGANT OFFICIAL INTENT TO CONTINUE VIOLATING U.S. LAW
But none of these realities – which have been rammed home by the technical work that we have published on this subject in International Currency Review, prepared by Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. – have had any impact so far on the thinking of derivatives sector participants, analysts and observers, who appear to be hell-bent on continuing to violate US legislation.

On the contrary, these people are concerned exclusively with ensuring that the discontinuity that enveloped their sector and the financial markets as a whole in mid-September 2008 – is reversed, even though a total resumption of derivatives trading at full throttle WILL lead the world, and all engaged in this fraudulent activity, into a black hole

Moreover, since cracks are appearing in the entire structure of sophisticated finance ‘as we speak’, centred on Greece – the previous Government of which incurred, through Fraudulent Finance operations using Citibank, Athens, as counterparty to Bush/Cheney trading activities, an immense portfolio of derivatives obligations estimated at 300 billion Euros off-balance sheet, which can never be honoured – the timing of the collapse need no longer be measured in years.

So the self-centred, myopic speculative institutions are behaving like gun-toting bandits in a department store – determined to have their own way, irrespective of the consequences: one of which is that in the event of default, colossal payouts are due on Credit Default Swap contracts, which in fact amounts to institutionalised blackmail.

THE DEPOSITORY TRUST & CLEARING CORPORATION IS IN OVERDRIVE
For its part, the main component of the derivatives infrastructure supporting this prospectively catastrophic speculative activity is the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) – best known for its Cede & Co. partnership nominee facility, which is the holder of almost every physical stock certificate in existence, and boasts of accounting for more than $2.0 quadrillion in (largely fake) securities transactions annually.

On 10th February 2010, the DTCC announced that the Federal Reserve Board had approved its application to establish a DTCC subsidiary which is to be a member of the Federal Reserve System to operate ‘the Trade Information Warehouse (Warehouse) for over-the-counter (OTC) credit derivatives and the ‘legally accepted’ global depository for over-the-counter credit derivatives transactions’. (10).

THE FEDERAL RESERVE HAS BECOME
THE BACK-STOP GUARANTOR OF CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS
Which means, in practice, that the Federal Reserve is now the GUARANTOR behind all Credit Default Swap (CDS) transactions that clear via DTCC. The new Fed-endorsed organisation will settle CDS obligations in all currencies and process credit events. It will also handle all over-the-counter credit derivatives traded worldwide, will be regulated by the Federal Reserve and the New York State Banking Department, as well as being ‘overseen’ by other American as well as international regulators (via a sort of college of supervisors).

The DTCC’s Trade Information Warehouse will be operated by a Warehouse Trust, beginning its operations ‘once certain organizational conditions have been met, which are expected shortly’. It is understood that the company will have been funded and will have started operations by March.

One observer, commenting on these arrangements, wrote to say: ‘To be sure, the net notional CDS amount, which is what counterparties would be on the hook for in the case of an orderly unwind of the financial system, is materially lower than the gross total. Yet, as systemic unwinds are never orderly, gross tends to become net – as for instance when Lehman bonds went from par to 10 cents in the space of 24 hours. Should systemic risk flare up again’ (think Greece – Ed.), ’and fiat-based market values quickly catch up with ‘fair values’ – which in our Ponzi economy can very easily be calculated: they are ALL ZERO – the Federal Reserve will be on the hook’, with the US taxpayer, for amounts so large that the volume of printed money will reduce the value of a dollar to one cent or less within the space of a few weeks (or less).

So basis spreads can be expected to be severely compressed, once counterparty risk has become a thing of the past and all systemic risk in the biggest derivatives marketplace (excluding interest rate swaps) is fully backstopped (in theory) by the Federal Reserve.

In addition, the DTCC will be guaranteed monopoly status with respect to Credit Default Swap trading, as no-one in this business will wish to transact or clear anywhere else.

• FACT: Monopolies are illegal under US, British and European law.

STAGE SET FOR AN UNIMAGINABLE (AVOIDABLE)
CATASTROPHE: A DEATH-WISH
So the stage is well and truly set for a catastrophe of unimaginable proportions, bearing in mind that under Geithner as President, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York alone accumulated a portfolio of derivatives ‘assets’ commonly cited at $500 trillion, but which is probably much larger. This of course makes a complete nonsense of the formal derivatives data published by the Bank for International Settlements, which excludes double-counting; but none of these numbers can be relied upon, although the Bank for International Settlements’ information possesses the cachet of authority and has to be used for want of better data (11).

The DTCC is also boasting of further innovations, including the expansion of its Global Corporate Actions (GCA) service based on feedback, sourcing scheduled payment announcements from the Federal Reserve Board for US structured and non-structured securities, specifically Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac securities, which are not DTC-eligible; scheduled payments coverage to include international securities that are not DTC-eligible; and distribution information on UK Unit Trusts.

THE DTCC’S OBLIGATIONS WAREHOUSE SERVICE
The January 2010 issue of DTCC News and Information for DTCC customers further discusses how the DTCC’s Obligations Warehouse, to be launched by mid-2010, will quote ‘provide transparency for the industry and regulators while delivering operational efficiencies, cost savings and risk mitigation to financial firms’. The new service will ‘close the chapter on the manual processing of ex-clearing trades by empowering ops. professionals with a real-time automated service that will electronically manage these transactions and communicate a match to each side of the obligation’.

‘The Obligation Warehouse service will also automate the management of non-Continuous Net Settlement (CNS) fails. ’Because these trades exist outside Continuous Net Settlement, the back office faces an accounting nightmare in handling these transactions – not to mention bearing the added costs for maintaining comprehensive records and dedicated personnel to keep track of their status. The Obligation Warehouse will help mitigate this risk by consolidating all ex-clearing and non-CNS fails in a central location and storing them until settlement’.

‘The Obligation Warehouse enhances transparency by fully capturing, for the first time ever, all trading activity in NSCC-eligible securities in a central location from trade date until settlement. As a result, ex-clearing trades will no longer be invisible to all but the direct parties to that particular transaction. Instead, the industry and regulators will have a complete view of all open obligations traded in the US marketplace for equities, corporates, municipals and also unit trust investment securities – and [will] have a central vantage point to monitor and mitigate systemic risk’ (12).

GREATER TRANSPARENCY WON’T ELIMINATE SYSTEMIC RISK,
OR PREVENT A CONFIDENCE CRISIS
But while being able to see systemic risk stresses emerging may be an advantage, it won’t, and cannot, eliminate systemic risk. This is because these trades are fraudulent given the fact that securitisation violates US law (and Common Law in English-speaking countries), while in most contexts anyway, they are bedevilled by a lack of real value and non-recourse characteristics.

As for Credit Default Swaps, whatever the contract provides and whenever the counterparties decide on the basis of the contract that a default has taken place or is about to take place, it is in the interests of the provider to allow the default to take place, given the huge payouts which ensue. In other words, the contract is based on latent blackmail. That alone makes it illegal.

SO, WHERE ARE YOU, MR HOLDER?
Much more seriously, as summarised above, securitisation contracts are ALL ILLEGAL under US and Common Law. Therefore, all US official and ‘private’ sector operations being framed so as to revalidate and rehabilitate securitisation represent a perverse assault on the Rule of Law, and the commission of multiple felonies – accordingly leaving ALL perpetrators, whether holders of public office under the United States or any other level of government or employed by wayard financial institutions, or developing the securitisation infrastructure, vulnerable to criminal investigation, indictment, arrest and prosecution for gross and knowing violations of the law.

Whether the scandalous immunity from prosecution awarded by the World Court on demand to the five self-acknowledged criminal US Presidents protects them from the appropriate legal sanctions, prosecution and punishment within the US jurisdiction itself, isn’t clear: but we doubt it. Ironically, therefore, since the five Presidents have, by demanding immunity from prosecution from the World Court, acknowledged their own criminality, it is open to the US authorities to investigate, indict and arrest these operatives – since they have acknowledged their guilt. Where are you, Mr Holder?

Your job is to administer justice without fear or favour, isn’t it?

APPENDIX:
LORD MYNERS SAYS THERE MUST BE PENALTIES FOR BANK EXCESSES
On 8th March 2010, the UK ‘City Minister’ (Financial Services Secretary), Lord Myners, who in our opinion has been far too laid-back in failing to condemn criminality in the corrupted City of London, said that financial markets must ‘punish’ those who ‘make mistakes’ [sic!]. Without a ‘downside’, it would be impossible to ‘restore’ market discipline.

In all likelihood, Lord Myners didn’t really understand what he was saying – which was that the market system wasn’t functioning properly. And the reason for that is summarised in our report above: securitisation impedes the proper operation of market forces via its opposition to public policy in the bankruptcy context, its antitrust characteristics, and in the other ways described in outline in the present report. Does Myners understand this?

All that Lord Myners actually said, at a meeting in London, was that bankers had been obscenely remunerated even though they had ‘made serious mistakes’ (unspoken), code for ‘behaved like organized criminals’ (even more unspoken): ‘A lot of people lost money in the financial sector over the last few years – bank shareholders in particular suffered massive losses’.

‘But many people have been protected. Creditors have been bailed out. Far too many bankers themselves have enjoyed massive awards during the crisis, even as their firms were rescued’.

Well, we knew all that. When he got down to detail, Myners told the meeting that the Government was determined to ensure that no bank was too complex to fail. ‘We’re serious about removing the safety net that has allowed those with blind faith in market efficiency to ignore the consequences of their lack of discipline’ [sic! Let the word ‘criminality’ NEVER BE MENTIONED].

‘We are also working with G-20 countries and the IMF to access the feasibility of an international levy or fee on financial institutions. This will make sure that any residual insurance that banks are perceived to enjoy after living wills are implemented, will not come for free’.

Lord Myners then redeemed his rather shallow observations by pointing out that the implicit support of the financial industry in the past had probably represented the most expensive public subsidy to any industry in any part of the British economy, ‘vastly exceeding’ that paid to agriculture or the defence industry.

‘There is no reason why the public, taxpayers, should continue to provide a free at the source of delivery subsidy to the cost of capital of the banking system. We need to do everything we can to shrink the subsidy to zero’.

Under the Brown Government’s new Financial Services Bill, consumers would be granted new powers to seek redress through the courts. However the weakness of Lord Myners’ presentation was his complete failure to indicate that he and the Government understand that a colossal volume of the transactions which gave rise to the crisis in the first place were and remain ILLEGAL.

It’s no use trying to reform the ‘framework’ when the transactions being promoted within the framework contravene antimonopoly legislation, bankruptcy legislation and all the other elements of the law identified in outline above. So, laudable though Lord Myners’ objectives appear to be, he is in fact wasting everyone’s time.

He appears not to understand that the transactions which precipitated the crisis were CRIMINAL TRANSACTIONS, and his failure to address the criminality issue – which is really the ONLY issue – indicates that the Government in London is trying to cover up and ignore the criminality: because of the vast tax accruals from the recalcitrant financial sector that the Government needs more than ever, given its colossal subsidies to the criminal financial enterprises whose casino operations have been exposed.

POSTSCRIPT:
STIGLITZ: ‘THE AMERICAN BANKING SYSTEM IS CORRUPT’
The headline above appeared in the British press on 10th March 2010. Eager with anticipation and almost salivering with excitement, your correspondent rushed to read the article in question. Here, at last, he thought, was a fully paid-up member of the Great and the Good coming to his senses and calling a spade a spade at last. Alas, for Nobel Prize-winning Dr Stiglitz, a spade is in fact a fork.

Professor Stiglitz, who teaches at New York’s Columbia University, said that the Federal Reserve System ‘smells bad’. The Editor invoked the smell of the Fed, and of course agreed. But on further reading, it transpired that Dr Stiglitz was merely complaining that the Presidents of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks are chosen by commercial bankers.

‘The regional Reserve Banks… have a key role in regulation and in the last crisis [i.e., once again, it’s ‘in the past’: Ed.] of bailing out the banks. But the heads of these organisations are chosen by a committee dominated by the big banks that are being bailed out… so the people bailing out are appointed by the people who they bailed out. It smells bad. It looks bad. It undermines confidence’.

OH DEAR. Is this the best Dr Stiglitz can do? The American banking system is corrupt because the heads of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks are chosen by the big banks? Is that really, Dr S., the reason that the system is corrupt? Have we not been exposing rampant racketeering by the same big banks alluded to? Oh sorry, we forgot. He’s a Nobel Prize-winning economist.

The holder of a Nobel Prize can only say what’s considered kosher by the globalist internationalists who use the Nobel Prize system to ‘EMBED’ the ‘PARTY LINE’ in the public’s psyche. So the ‘party line’, as we speak, is to ACKNOWLEDGE that, yes, the US banking system is indeed corrupt, as Mr Story has been reiterating as nauseam, but to attribute this to the way the heads of the regional Feds are chosen. [With the Federal Reserve Board, the number of Feds is a geomasonic 13].

Notes and references:

(1): As previously reported, the Editor visited the veteran author and journalist Gordon Thomas, at his suggestion, in Bath in the fourth quarter of 2004.

During that visit, Mr Thomas indicated that MI-6 had informed the British media that Christopher Story has been a participant in the abortive putsch in Equatorial Guinea, with which Mark Thatcher was associated. Since the Editor of this service has done nothing, literally, since 1963, except run his publishing and print production businesses, the Editor asked why such lies and false witness would be perpetrated – especially against someone such as the Editor of this service whose loyalty to the Crown and the United Kingdom cannot possibly be, and has never been, questioned.

He replied:

‘They think you may be dangerous because you control your own
publications and you have the documents’.

In divulging this, of course, Mr Thomas revealed that MI-6 itself had something to hide. If the Editor was dangerous ‘because you hold the documents’, the documents themselves clearly represented elements of something much bigger. So the consequence of this intervention was that the Editor naturally redoubled his private investigations to establish what MI-6 were so anxious to cover up.

When the Editor protested to Thomas that the lies disseminated to the media about him were rank fabrications, Gordon Thomas uttered the memorable response:

‘It doesn’t matter that it’s not true. What matters is that it’s out there’.

In the course of this meeting, Gordon Thomas made it quite clear to the Editor that he is an agent of influence and acts as an agent for MI-6. He said that his father had been an MI-6 officer.

Given Thomas’s statement ‘It doesn’t matter that it’s not true. What matters is that it’s out there’, everything that Gordon Thomas himself publishes must, by definition, be questioned – since he was quite content to go along with this twisted and nefarious mentality.

• You could say that by revealing this to the Editor, both Thomas and MI-6 exhibited a degree of abject stupidity which perhaps we haven’t emphasised sufficiently.

Furthermore, it became quite obvious that the purpose of this exercise was intimidation. Thomas accompanied his message with a veiled threat, as well. Clearly, these people are accustomed to targets caving in to such pressures, and they have no immediate backstop plans when the target fails to react in accordance with their evil intentions.

As a follow-up to this operation, Thomas badgered the Editor in New York to get in touch with an operative who later turned out to go by the nickname ‘The Visitor’, who used the name Walker as an alias, but who’s real (Ukrainian) name is Demchuk. This operative was said to have Pentagon links. At fist the Editor refused, but Gordon Thomas (as agent for MI-6) persisted, and finally the Editor agreed to meet this fellow, by appointment (arranged via Hushmail) in the fishing tackle area of a sports store on Fifth Avenue. The Editor has no interest in sport and had never been inside a sports store. However at the appointed hour, the Editor appeared, and found this man lurking in the traditional grey raincoat amid the fishing rods. We repaired to the Algonquin Hotel, where the operative proceeded to pump the Editor on one subject alone, namely Lt. Mark Delmart Vreeland.

Subsequently, Demchuk pestered the Editor to reveal all he knew about the Iraqi ‘Sarindar’ WMD removal programme, under which two Soviet ships had sailed from the Iraqi port of Umm Qasr in February 2002, ahead of the illegal invasion. The Editor had obtained information on this from open sources, especially the high-level Romanian defector, Ion Pacepa, and additionally from Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU), some information about which is available on the Internet.

In other words, the information supplied to this ‘US’ operative by the Editor was all obtained from open sources. The operative ordered a number of our publications which he said he would pay for, received them, but later vanished without fulfilling his financial undertaking (par for the course).

In March 2005, the Editor suddenly received a phone call from this Pentagon-linked operative in London, in which he spoke immediately about some operation in Monaco involving the dubious operative Bernie Ecclestone. The US operative appeared to assume that the Editor knew what he was talking about, as he gave the Editor to understand that he (Demchuk) believed that the Editor was involved with whatever operation in Monaco (a key CIA center) he was talking about. When the Editor said: ‘I have no idea what you are talking about. You’d better go back to your source’, there was a very long and stony silence.

He then said: ‘Well, that’s very surprising, in view of where this comes from’. Since the Editor knew from another source that Demchuk had just visited MI-6, it almost immediately became crystal clear that this was yet another attempt by MI-6 to ‘sting’ the Editor of this service.

In view of the fact that a US ‘inside’ source told a contact of the Editor’s in February 2010 that ‘MI-6 intend to take Story out’, because he knows too much about what is going on (and what they are up to), we place the foregoing information on the record again: and we will revisit these sequences with greater, hitherto unpublished, detail, in due course.

If the British intelligence community thinks it can intimidate a private publisher whose sole interest is to expose the racketeering that these people are all trying to cover up, it had better think again. You could argue that what we have done to date has actually assisted the British authorities to get their acts together in the face of this unprecedented crisis: but to be informed, after going through so much, that they intend to ‘take Story down’, is one slap in the face too many: and it reflects very badly on the US source of this disgraceful threat and further intimidation attempt, as well.

For the elimination of all residual doubt, we will persist with these exposures until such time as the necessary remedial measures have been taken. Interestingly, as you will have noted appended to this report (Appendix), Lord Myners, the City (of London) Minister in the Labour Government, has just indicated that the measures taken to discipline the City have been quite inadequate to date – although he fails to use words like ‘criminal’, ‘fraud’, ‘organised crime’, ‘racketeering’, ‘Fraudulent Finance’ etc: so he has a great deal of catching up (with us) to do.

(2): See the following reports on this website [Archive]:

• 9th January 2010: Text of the CMKM/CMKX lawsuit against the S.E.C.: Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx): Santa Ana, California. Subsequent to our posting the complete text of the Complaint immediately it had been filed, the text was also made available on the following link: http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda

• 29th January 2010: Service of CMKM/CMKX $3.87 trillion suit vs. S.E.C.

• 07 February 2010: Legal moves to sue those blocking the Settlements

• 02 March 2010: S.E.C. Phantom Shares Fraud: New Intelligence

(3): See text of the letter from Mr A. Clifton Hodges, Attorney for the CMKM/CMKX victims, to the Office of the Attorney General for New York State, Mr Andrew Cuomo: report of 2nd March 2010.

(4): Wanta’s rôle, having served as courier between Bush Sr. and Gorbachëv, has always been to facilitate thefts and diversions of funds to George Bush Sr. (and Gorbachëv, given that the former Communist President is a partner with Bush Sr. in Deutsche AG., as explained in this and recent reports). This helps to explain why from time to time during these investigations, we have been told that ‘Bush Sr. considers the monies to belong to him’.

(5) A ‘Foreclosure Autopsy’ reporting service is available, for instance, from the following analyst:

Charles Wayne Cox
Certified Forensic Loan Analyst
Notary Public
131 Sutphen Street
Santa Cruz
California 95060
Telephone: 831-466 3440
Facsimile: 619-330 2379
Email: mailto:Charles@BayLiving.com
Website: www.ForensicLoanAnalyst.com

Charles Cox is recommended to the Editor personally by a friend of impeccable integrity who is also an expert on these issues, based in San Diego. Cox is a Para-Legal and a noted forensic expert on reading mortgage documents, serving lawyers to help their foreclosure clients. Our friend and correspondent wrote, when introducing Charles Cox: ‘Charles helped a friend of mine here in San Diego by reading his original Note and mortgage documents. Incredibly, the Note to the mortgage was made out to San Diego. Later, a copy from the County Recorder’s office showed that San Diego had been crossed out, and written in was ‘United Republic’.

The mortgage was done by a mortgage company in Colorado (now out of business) but was sold to Aurora which was owned by Lehman Brothers. Aurora is still the servicer on the loan, and my friend is suing them and requested through a qualified letter a copy of the original Note to show that they are the legal owners of the Note’.

(6): ‘Northern Rock’s Line in Excuses: Holding Paid-out Title Deeds for Five Years: A forensic analysis of how Northern Rock managed to hold on to title deeds belonging to a former mortgagor, with details of its conflicting excuses for non-performance’: International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York, Numbers 1 and 2, pages F-153 to F-172.

(7) ‘Securitization is completely illegal and fraudulent under US law’, Economic Intelligence Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York, pages 5-21.

(8): ‘Gensler Turns Back on Wall Street to Push Derivatives Overhaul’,
Bloomberg, 12th February 2010.

(9): ‘Gensler Turns Back on Wall Street to Push Derivatives Overhaul’,
Bloomberg, op. cit., 12th February 2010.

(10) ‘January 2010 News and Information for DTCC customers’ published
by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation’, accessed 13th February 2010.

(11): The derivatives data maintained by the Bank for International Settlements, and reproduced by the International Monetary Fund in successive issues of its literature, are the only ‘reliable’ data available. Because they are issued by the BIS, they are authoritative, but it is not known whether they are accurate. The BIS data, which exclude double counting, showed that in June 2008, total Notional Over-the-Counter derivatives contracts outstanding on that basis reached some $693,814 billion. By December 2008, this total had contracted to $547,371 billion given the discontinuity of September 2008; but by June 2008, the total outstanding had recovered to $604,622 billion.

The Gross Market value of total underlying derivatives contracts outstanding amounted to $20.4 trillion in June 2008. $32.2 trillion in December 2008, and $25.4 trillion in June 2009.

(12): ‘January 2010 News and Information for DTCC customers’ published
by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation’, op. cit., accessed 13th February 2010.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time AMENDING AND INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE. In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

GORBACHEV IMPLICATED IN STEALING COTTRELL’S CONTRACT

THE TOP GANGSTERS EXPOSED: GORBACHEV, KOHL, BUSH SR., ACKERMANN

Thursday 4 February 2010 05:01

WITH DEUTSCHE AG PARTNERS HELMUT KOHL, BUSH SR., AND ACKERMANN, GORBACHEV ALSO BENEFITED FROM THEFT OF THE QUEEN’S GOLD AS A PARTNER IN DEUTSCHE AG

RACKETEERING THROUGH GERMANY BY GORBACHEV, KOHL, AND THE U.S. GANGSTERS
In the following analysis, everything starts coming decisively together. We now prove that former President Mikhail S. Gorbachev, working with former US President George H. W. Bush Sr., former German Chancellor Helmut Kohl and Dr Joseph Ackermann, all partners in Deutsche AG (formerly called Barrington Investment Group), Switzerland, stole a contract using the electronic tag to the securities account owned by Michael C. Cottrell’s Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., with Benchmark Securities, In., New Jersey, at a table-top meeting in Geneva on 7th October 2002 by the means described below, which included the electronic ‘forging’ of Mr Cottrell’s signature. This theft was preceded by seven related thefts from Mr Cottrell’s firm’s securities account, itemised below.

This means that former President Mikhail Gorbachev and former German Chancellor Helmut Kohl are financial criminals like George H. B. Bush Sr. and should be treated accordingly. Mr Gorbachev and Helmut Kohl have, as partners in Deutsche AG, by definition been profiting from the theft of Mr Cottrell’s contract and property, and also, as further revealed below, from proceeds from the theft of The Queen’s gold, which, we were informed at 1.15 am on 4th February 2010, have likewise been channelled through Deutsche AG, Switzerland. As of 2nd February 2010, The Queen’s gold had not been restored. [In view of what we allude to but cannot divulge below, this grim situation may have changed on 3rd February, but we don’t know whether this is the case, yet].

• The proceeds of innumerable corrupt transactions involving these characters have been run through the DVD’s main institutions, Deutsche Bank and Dresdner Bank. So what is being exposed is that George H. W. Bush Sr. (CIA/DVD) and Mikhail Gorbachev (Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) and KGB/FSB) have been ransacking American and non-American victims alike, and running this colossal open-ended racketeering through Germany, with the assistance of the former STASI of East Germany (who are GESTAPO in relabelled clothing). Hence the presence on the scene of STASI operatives such as Eva Teleki, a Swedish opera singer, and other operatives suspected of being continuing STASI agents, such as Chancellor Angela Merkel (the former Secretary of the Agitation and Propaganda Department of the Young Communists at Marx Lenin University, in East Berlin). This explains why Merkel was earlier fingered by this service as guardian in Germany of George Bush Sr.’s stolen and exploited racketeering assets with German institutions.

• Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, who is a senior Soviet GRU operative, was based in East Germany before he migrated to Leningrad, and is believed to have been responsible for orchestrating, at least from the Soviet side, the clockwork ‘collapsible communism’ operations in Eastern Europe. Gorbachev has been reported to us to operate from a large wing of the Kremlin, as though he never left the place. Which he didn’t. He’s been at the centre of this criminality THROUGHOUT.

• Leo Wanta, who answers the phone in German, was the courier between George H. W. Bush Sr. and Mikhail Gorbachev. Although he says he’s Polish, we think this felon and fraudster (who has stolen this Editor’s loan plus interest) may be a DVD operative/double agent, possibly STASI.

• Note: It is standard CIA ‘tradecraft’ practice to usurp the expertise of outside professional talent if it is not available in-house or by some other means. In this context, the CIA perpetrators needed a US securities expert with impeccable credentials and a securities account. What the CIA does is apply its standard Bush-style ‘bait and switch’ technique, exploiting and maximising the potential of the usurped professional expertise, before rejecting it and stealing the assets associated with it.

That’s what happened to Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. This procedure also explains Wanta’s ‘use’ of Mr Cottrell for his failed AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. operation, because Mr Michael C. Cottrell has the requisite securities market expertise and account facilities, which were applied for the benefit of Mr Wanta. Note also that Steven Goodwin, the Wanta Attorney in Richmond, VA, who accepted this Editor’s $35,000, which Wanta stole, was born, as stated previously, in Dusseldorf.

• ‘BLAIR AND BERNANKE REPORTEDLY ARRESTED ON 3RD FEBRUARY’
It was reported to us at 1:00am on 4th February 2010 that the forgoing were both ARRESTED on Wednesday 3rd February 2010: see below for outline details. BREAKING.

• TWO GIANT WHITE HOUSE THEFTS THEY’VE LIVED TO REGRET

• STEALING THE QUEEN’S GOLD, COTTRELL’S CONTRACT (PLUS CMKX)

• MORE ABOUT JEB BUSH’S APPEARANCE AT THE WHITE HOUSE

• WHITE HOUSE THEFTS FROM MICHAEL C. COTTRELL’S FIRM,
AND THE ELECTRONIC FORGING OF HIS SIGNATURE

• GORBACHEV AND KOHL IMPLICATED WITH BUSH SR. AND ACKERMANN

• DEUTSCHE BANK AG A CO-CONSPIRATOR WITH BUSH JR. AND CHENEY

• BLAIR AND BERNANKE REPORTED TO US TO HAVE BEEN ‘ARRESTED’

• THE NOOSE HAS TIGHTENED AND THE TRAPDOOR IS POISED TO FALL

• CRIMINAL OPS. WITHIN A ‘RULE OF LAW’ FRAMEWORK

• SHOCKS PENDING FOR PEOPLE WHO FANCY THEY HAVE ‘STELLAR REPUTATIONS’

• LIES AND DIVERSIONARY PLOYS OVER WORLD COURT JURISDICTION

• THE THEFT OF THE QUEEN’S GOLD AND THE LIEN ON THE U.S. TREASURY

• U.S. TREASURY IS THE DEFENDANT IN THE WORLD COURT ACTION

• ELECTRONIC JAMMING OF GOLD THEFT PHONE CONVERSATION

• GERMANY IS BEING PROGRESSIVELY EXPOSED AS THE ENEMY

• NON MERCI! IL FAUT TOUT D’ABORD QUE VOUS VOUS DEBARRASSEZ DES ALLEMANDS

• SCANDAL OF WALL-TO-WALL U.S. OFFICIAL PSY-OPS AGAINST AMERICANS

• C.I.A. SCAMS INSIDE GOVERNMENT AS WELL AS THE PRIVATE SECTOR

• ‘SORCHA FAAL’ WARMONGERING’ AGITPROP OPERATION
RUN BY AN OFFICE OF NAVAL INTELLIGENCE AGENT FROM VIENNA, VA

• WHY THE EAVESDROPPERS ROUTINELY SHOOT THEMSELVES IN THEIR CLUB FEET

• THE HIDEOUS FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC ‘SHOCKS’ IN STORE

• THE LATEST AVAILABLE DERIVATIVES NOTIONAL VALUE DATA

• CONGRESS SLAPPED IN THE FACE AS WELL: BY NEIL BAROFSKY

• FOR ‘FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEMS’ READ: RAMPANT CRIMINALITY

• BANKERS AT DAVOS REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN AT LOGGERHEADS

• U.S. CROOKS REPORTED TO BE FLEEING THE COUNTRY

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation can be accessed immediately: See the Home Page World Reports Limited serials catalogue by clicking World Reports Limited and scrolling to foot of page. Scroll to the foot of THIS page to read our extended Ad. for the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION.

• Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and ‘politically incorrect’ [i.e., correct] intelligence books online from this website.

• CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS:
Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010]
Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx):
SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C.
The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.

Note: If the current report [4th February 2010] is displayed, access the Archive for immediate display of our CMKM/CMKX report dated 29th January. All preceding reports, at least back to December, are also relevant to the current state of tension brought about by these gangsters.

• And note that this report EXPANDS our understanding for WHO has been involved all along.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

MORE ABOUT JEB BUSH’S APPEARANCE AT THE WHITE HOUSE
In our report dated 31st January, referencing the appearance of Jeb Bush at the White House on Saturday 30th January accompanying Godfather Bush Sr., we stated as follows: ‘Furthermore, the reason Jeb Bush suddenly surfaced was that Jeb Bush was involved when the Delmarva funds were stolen in August 2002. It will be recalled that Jeb was on record earlier as protecting his own interests under the smokescreen of the lie that his father was too gaga to know what he was doing, which has always been baloney. So Jeb has been caught too’.

The underlying facts here, which are central to the state of affairs reached at the end of January 2010 and which explain Jeb Bush’s sudden surfacing at the White House, as well as his sombre appearance when photographed leaving the official residence in a snowstorm, are as follows:

(1): Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. had served as a Trustee of Delmarva Timber Trust
and remains a Trustee of the Trust.

(2): In 2002, given Mr Cottrell’s status as a Delmarva Timber Trust Trustee and his security and background check credentials, Mr Michael C. Cottrell’s corporation Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.,
had been offered a contract to trade $500 billion by Deutsche Bank AG.

(3): This contract was stolen from Mr Cottrell’s computer, complete with his signature and passport image and details, by specific instructions of Dr Joseph Ackermann’s co-partner in Deutsche AG (formerly Barrington Investment Group), George Bush Sr., and his criminalist associates, Richard B. Cheney and George W. Bush Jr. between 19th August and 7th October 2002, using the National Security Agency (NSA) T-2 program. Mr Cottrell’s signature was ‘forged’ in the sense that it was lifted from his computer and used to seal the consequent illegal transactions accruing for the benefit of Gorbachev, Kohl and Bush. Further details of these thefts, will be found below.

(4): On 19th August 2002, Jeb Bush attended a meeting with Delmarva Timber Trust personnel, the subject matter of that meeting being how Delmarva could make a deal with George H. W. Bush Sr. and with George W. Bush.

(5): In our brief reference above and in our report dated 31st January 2010, the statement that ‘the Delmarva funds were stolen’ contained a misunderstanding by the Editor. It was funds deposited in a securities account belonging to Mr Cottrell’s Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., that were stolen, by means of the electronic ‘forging’ of Michael Cottrell’s signature, on the specific instructions of the Bushes and Cheney, from the White House. Mr Cottrell had been offered the contract by Deutsche Bank given his Delmarva Timber Trust background and his securities credentials.

WHITE HOUSE THEFTS FROM MICHAEL C. COTTRELL’S FIRM,
AND THE ELECTRONIC FORGING OF HIS SIGNATURE
As BREAKING EVENTS are showing, this was a fatal theft too far by the DVD’s Bush Crime Family and their lackey, MK-ULTRA operative Richard B. Cheney.

Deutsche Bank had been more than content to approve the securities market credentials of Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. a Delmarva Trust Trustee, with rollovers and extensions. His firm’s securities account was held within Benchmark Securities, Inc., New Jersey. Deutsche Bank had concluded that he was the ONLY American they would be prepared to consider for the intended trading purposes; and after they had checked him and his credentials out, they were delighted and so approved him for the $500 billion contract.

Funds had been procured and tagged to Pennslyvania Investments Inc.’s securities account within Benchmark Securities Inc., New Jersey, for the purpose of using the funds with the contract.

Between 19th August 2002 and 7th October 2002, the Bush II White House, using the National Security Agency’s T-2 program, fraudulently ‘pinged’ Michael C. Cottrell’s securities account on seven separate occasions. The perpetrators were consequently able to purchase several billion dollars’ worth of contract paper on each occasion.

At the end of this exercise, at a table-top meeting in Geneva on 7th October 2002, they activated the electronic tag to access the contract enabling them to steal the contract for Deutsche AG and the funds in Pennsylvania Investments Inc.’s securities account within Benchmark Securities Inc.

In order for them to achieve these thefts, Michael C. Cottrell’s signature was electronically copied for the purpose – the electronic equivalent of forgery of the principal’s signature. Therefore, in addition to conspiracy to commit theft, and to the thefts themselves, the criminals concerned, who include Mikhail Gorbachev and Helmut Kohl, perpetrated forgery as well.

GORBACHEV AND KOHL IMPLICATED WITH BUSH SR. AND ACKERMANN
As previously reported, partners in Deutsche AG, formerly Barrington Investment Group, include Dr Joseph Ackermann, the DVD’s main banker, George H. W. Bush Sr., Helmut Kohl, the former Chancellor of Germany, and former President Mikhail Gorbachev, all of whom, therefore, are co-conspirators in perpetrating the theft implemented in Geneva on 7th October 2002.

Former President Mikhail Gorbachev and former German Chancellor Helmut Kohl have shared the proceeds accruing to their partnership in Deutsche AG (formerly Barrington Investment Group), so Gorbachev and Kohl are identified as having STOLEN THE CONTRACT AND FUNDS BELONGING TO MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, B.A., M.S., elaborated above.

DEUTSCHE BANK AG. A CO-CONSPIRATOR WITH BUSH JR. AND CHENEY
Also implicated were George W. Bush (Jr.), Richard B. Cheney and Cheney’s aide, Libby. Since Deutsche Bank had approved Michael C. Cottrell’s credentials as stated above, in allowing these illegal transactions to go through on the basis of an electronically stolen (and therefore forged) version of Mr Cottrell’s signature, Deutsche Bank itself became a co-conspirator, with Deutsche AG and its partners, in these successive thefts and exploitations of the funds which had been placed with Mr Cottrell’s securities account at Benchmark Securities, Inc., New Jersey.

The named highest-level US perpetrators, who erroneously imagined that they are covered by the National Securities Act of 1947 et seq. and are accordingly ‘licensed’ to abuse their high offices by committing theft, fraud and forgery, then intimidated and bore false witness against Mr Cottrell and arranged for the FBI to utter threats against him. Specifically, on 2nd October 2002, FBI Special Agent Jan Trigg and FBI Special Agent O’Grady [telephone number: 718-286 7307] telephoned Mr Cottrell at 3:44pm, accused HIM of conducting fraudulent transactions, and accompanied this lie with threats. In reality, the fraudulent transactions were being conducted by George H. W. Bush Sr., Richard B. Cheney, President George W. Bush and their foreign high-level partners.

BLAIR AND BERNANKE REPORTED TO US TO HAVE BEEN ‘ARRESTED’
At 1.00 am UK time on this date, 4th February 2010, the Editor was informed that the following were arrested on 3rd February 2010:

• Tony Blair, former British Prime Minister.

• Dr Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board

• Please note that the foregoing statement IS ACCURATE. CONSTRUE what has just been stated: The Editor was informed by transatlantic telephone at the time and date stated here, of the above arrests. This, we repeat, is 100% ACCURATE as presented to you. That’s what we’ve been told.

• Note: The possible ‘cover’ for the arrest of Blair may have been the fact that when the respected former British Labour Government Cabinet Minister, Clair Short, testified on 2nd February 2010 at the Chilcot Inquiry into whether Britain’s participation in the Iraq War was illegal, she denounced Blair as a liar, deceiver and con artist. Specifically, Ms. Short stated that Blair lied to his Cabinet and misled Britain’s Parliament over the Iraq War, accusing Blair of personally ‘conning’ her and of ‘deceiving the Cabinet, Parliament and the public’. Ms. Clare Short said that when she tried to question the legal case for war in Cabinet, she was jeered at, and Blair told her to ‘be quiet’. [Sources: Daily Telegraph, 3rd February 2010, page 12; The Times, 3rd February 2010, page 14].

• At 1.15 am UK time on this date, 4th February 2010, the Editor was informed that two top MI-6 personnel travelled to the United States to supervise matters currently in hand.

• The Editor was also informed of travel arrangements to the United States concerning a top personage but chooses to withhold this information at this time.

THE NOOSE HAS TIGHTENED AND THE TRAPDOOR IS POISED TO FALL
Of course what has happened is that due to their criminal greed in general, and as a consequence of this colossal theft in particular, involving the electronic ‘forging’ of Mr Cottrell’s signature, it has been possible to turn the tables on these careless and overconfident gangsters – with the noose being tightened progressively round their necks by stages.

• They are now metaphorically standing on the platform, with the executioner poised beneath them ready to shift the lever to open the trapdoor into which they will be dropped.

You may well ask yet again why have these people not been arrested in front of the TV cameras – as so many furious observers, including ourselves, have understandably been demanding. Among reasons for this not happening, we suppose, are included feeble fears for the future of the dollar system and the Republic; but the most likely generic reason for this not happening to date has been an unwarranted expectation by almost all elements within the US structures involved in the criminality and in covering it up, that they would all get away with everything in the end, given that their criminalist foreign associates are such big names.

• WE DON’T THINK SO…

CRIMINAL OPS. WITHIN A ‘RULE OF LAW’ FRAMEWORK
The real opposition has not crumbled – highlighting the central problem that these organised gangsters face, which can be summarised as follows:

• On the one hand, they have ‘successfully’ and comprehensively subverted the Rule of Law, the financial system, the domestic and world economies, the US intelligence community, many other intelligence communities and governments, the US military, elements of the US judiciary and law enforcement, and Wall Street. You would have thought that this would be more than enough to guarantee these gangsters open-ended ‘success’ for ever more, wouldn’t you.

• Yet on the other hand, since EVERYTHING they do is illegal, criminal or borderline ditto, and since they lie through their teeth and have to continue lying through their teeth because each successive lie has to be propped up with further lies, they recognise that they must operate within what remains of the Rule of Law and the judicial system that they despise. Otherwise they wouldn’t get their lies so entangled, and they wouldn’t go to such lengths (such as citing ‘national security’ as cover for criminal activity) to cover up their endless criminal behaviour.

As was inevitable given their overconfidence and the web of conflicting lies with which they are strangling themselves, the residual Rule of Law and the judicial system have caught up with these inveterate gangsters. We know for a fact that ‘they’ never expected that the lawyers acting for the CMKM/CMKX Plaintiffs [see Archive reports dated 9th January and 29th January] would actually FILE their devastating Complaint requesting monetary payment of $3.87 trillion given the floatation of an estimated 2.0 to 2.25 trillion phantom CMKM/CMKX shares from within the SEC itself.

However the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Mary L. Schapiro, has been served with the Summons, and the other defendants have been or are about to be served their Summonses, as well.

SHOCKS PENDING FOR PEOPLE WHO FANCY THEY HAVE ‘STELLAR REPUTATIONS’
Given updated indications of failure hitherto to perform across the board financially, subpoenas are pending against individuals whose careers and ‘stellar reputations’, whether hospitalised or not, will be abruptly terminated as a consequence.

• Ignoring Summonses is not an option. Such behaviour would ensure summary judgment against the defendants, probably associated with jail sentences for contempt of court.

LIES AND DIVERSIONARY PLOYS OVER WORLD COURT JURISDICTION
Meanwhile a routine old lie that is being revived in order to obfuscate the desperate plight facing the gangsters, is that the World Court has no jurisdiction in the United States. This obfuscation has been trotted out for years, and is being irresponsibly promulgated by some disruptive US websites. Like parallel spurious ‘Black’ propaganda with similar cover-up intent, this reiterated assertion is both irrelevant and malicious. Readers are misled by such diversions, perpetrated by operatives who are perfectly well aware of the true situation, and are deliberately instructed to cover it up. In what follows, we have no choice but to mingle geopolitical analysis based on our deep experience, with the necessary financial and gold information. You can extract the financial and gold information from the analysis, and it will stand unaffected as precisely described here.

THE THEFT OF THE QUEEN’S GOLD AND THE LIEN ON THE U.S. TREASURY
Underlying facts associated with the World Court lien against the US Treasury reported by this service include the following, and concern the theft of The Queen’s gold on 29th-30th March 2007. Contrary to what we were led to believe later in 2007, this matter has NOT been rectified, according to the most recent information obtained from US inside (official) sources and passed to this Editor at about 7:00pm UK time on 3rd February.

• Therefore, The Queen’s gold has remained STOLEN now for the best part of TWO years.
[Note: We are not able to discuss this matter beyond what is published here].

This scandalous state of affairs has been deliberately exploited by the large pan-German Nazi Fifth Column in the United States as a wedge to destroy the British Monarchy and to create tension and confusion between the two wings of the ‘Main Enemy’ (as the continuing Nazis and their covert Soviet associates see us), Britain and the United States. The ultimate objective is to destroy what remains of the Anglo-US Alliance – to drive a wedge between the two countries, and this operation which is far advanced. It is now being comprehensively THWARTED.

(1): On 20th-30th March 2007, a highest-level US criminal intelligence operation serving the interests of the pan-German Fifth Column was mounted to steal gold belonging to the British Monarchical Power. As indicated, it is a primary objective of the ongoing pan-German Nazi ‘Black’ counterintelligence apparatus, Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD), the heirs of the Abwehr – before whom Chancellor Angela Merkel, genuflects – to destroy the British Monarchy.

The British Monarchy provides national stability and stands in the way of the completion of the pan-German long-range strategy for hegemony in Europe and beyond. Even more to the point here, the British Monarchical Power is the ONLY power standing for the true Rule of Law – the ONLY power standing firm in the face of the ‘Black’ forces bent on thrusting the world into irretrievable chaos, not least by continuing ad infinitum their Fraudulent Finance operations.

• That’s why the Monarchy is targeted as described

(2): On Friday 29th March 2007, British banking system went ‘dead’ – such that the Editor of this service, who attempted a small VISA Credit card transaction in Victoria Street, London SW1, that afternoon, was unable to complete the transaction. When the Editor made some enquiries, it later transpired that Credit Card transactions had failed across the board in the United Kingdom. Further enquiries eventually yielded the following astonishing state of affairs:

(3): The banking ‘blackout’ extending into Saturday 30th March 2007 (separately confirmed to us, incidentally, by top Westminster political sources on 13th December 2008, and on subsequent occasions, the most recent of which, as noted, was 3rd February 2010), was used as ‘Blackout’ cover for the stealing of gold belonging to the British Monarchical Power.

This theft forms part of the basis for the action taken, in collaboration with Chinese parties, by agents for the British Monarchical Power against the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve, resulting in the lien for $47 trillion on the US Treasury referenced in some of our earlier reports. This lien is in force and has not yet been discharged (although this may be ‘in process’).

• As a consequence, the United States is temporarily not sovereign, a state of affairs that will unfortunately remain the case until this matter is resolved.

(4): By early May 2007, research conducted by this service had confirmed that a massive theft of gold directed from the highest levels of the criminal US Government structures (in conformity with the long-range pan-German strategy to destroy the British Monarchical Power) had indeed been secretly perpetrated on 29th-30th March 2007. On 15th May 2007, the Editor happened to mention to a US party that US criminalists had stolen The Queen’s gold. The person retorted that ‘I find that hard to believe’ and the Editor replied: ‘In that case, as you don’t believe what I say, don’t ever contact me again’. This conversation was recorded by the eavesdroppers, disrupting certain operations being conducted against the Editor of this service.

(5): At 1:45pm UK time on Tuesday 2nd February 2010, the Editor was engaged in a transatlantic telephone conversation with Michael C. Cottrell B.A., M.S., in which the Editor had raised the issue of ongoing attempts by controlled websites to obfuscate the jurisdiction of the World Court in the United States (an old diversionary ‘line’). As this matter was being reviewed, Mr Cottrell said:

‘They stole The Queen’s gold in London, not in the United States. Hence she can prosecute them under the British anti-terrorism legislation’.

(6): As soon as Mr Cottrell had said ‘They stole The Queen’s gold’, the transatlantic phone call was heavily jammed electronically by eavesdroppers. [See our observations about the stupidity of the eavesdroppers, below]. Every time they do this, they simply confirm the accuracy of what is being discussed. It was just possible for us to conclude the conversation above the din, and the Editor therefore managed to add that, thanks to this further confirmation (now afforded by the electronic jamming), the matter of the stealing of the gold in 2007 would be revisited by this column.

• The theft of The Queen’s gold was discussed internally in the United States on 3rd February 2010, and as indicated above, the Editor was susbequently informed that this matter remained outstanding and had NOT been resolved.

(7): Two of the actual criminal events which have given rise to this crisis and to the lien, took place in Europe: in London (the stealing of The Queen’s gold) and also in The Netherlands (the operation against ABN Amro). Thus BOTH criminal events afford the British Monarchical Power jurisdiction under British and European anti-terrorism legislation, which embraces ALL financial criminality – providing a further reason why our description of the US high-level operatives and gangsters as Financial Terrorists, is accurate. The relevant British and European anti-terrorism legislation is believed to have been duly invoked.

(8): Proceeds from the trading of The Queen’s gold have been systematically channelled, we now understand, through Deutsche AG (formerly Barrington Investment Group, Switzerland), which of course means that Messrs Gorbachev, Kohl, Bush Sr, Ackermann, et al, HAVE PROFITED FROM THE STEALING OF THE QUEEN’S GOLD. Hence, they are themselves criminal Financial Terrorists.

U.S. TREASURY IS THE DEFENDANT IN THE WORLD COURT ACTION
Since the United States is the defendant in this (and the Chinese) World Court case(s), World Court jurisdiction most definitely applies in the United States, contrary to the mischievous disinformation being recycled for obfuscatory purposes, by US agents of influence who have been so instructed. The World Court is, moreover, an offshoot of the United Nations, arising from the Bretton Woods Agreements. The World Court also has an American Justice; and enforcement, auditing and other relevant personnel associated with this World Court matter were indeed sworn in at the US Justice Department at the beginning of December 2009, as we reported – given that it is necessary under international law for foreign personnel engaged in enforcement of World Court orders to be sworn-in on the soil of the defendant country.

ELECTRONIC JAMMING OF GOLD THEFT PHONE CONVERSATION
It was clear from the electronic jamming which interfered with the foregoing transatlantic telephone conversation that US electronic intelligence services wished this matter to be suppressed. In view of what is transpiring in ‘real time’ as this report is being finalised, their anxiety is understandable. But precisely because of that intervention, we are hereby taking this opportunity to lay out the facts more fully than before, as known to us – bearing in mind that this service exposed the gold theft in 2007, within a matter of weeks after that assault by Germany’s agents within the US structures against the British Monarchical Power.

You may now perhaps understand why, outraged at this development, we then called for the US Ambassador to be recalled from London, for him to be ordered to procure the rectification of this assault within a specified period, and in the absence of any progress within two months, for the US Embassy to be closed and US bases operating on British territory to be evacuated.

Of course, given innumerable other considerations, we did not expect any of this to happen: but strong language needed to be used in order to convey, to those with ears to hear, the extreme gravity of the situation, and to advertise the theft which no-one else (of course) was reporting.

GERMANY IS BEING PROGRESSIVELY EXPOSED AS THE ENEMY
Because Britain is enmeshed in the sterile European Union Collective – the long-range pan-German hegemony collectivisation operation mapped out under Hitler and delineated in the compendium Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft, published in Berlin in 1942, which we have extensively exposed elsewhere [in particular in The New Underworld Order], it is still taboo to describe Germany as THE ENEMY.

• But there is no doubt whatsoever that this is an accurate statement.

In the European sphere, France covers for Germany under the terms of the Treaty of the Elysée (January 1963), which is of indefinite duration and provides for both sides to reach ‘an analogous position’ in respect of all external matters of common interest.

The indefinite treaty was signed by the duplicitous General Charles de Gaulle, no friend of Britain despite his exile in London during the war, and Dr Konrad Adenauer, the former Hitler-era mayor of Cologne, and friend of Hitler’s favourite German bankers, Drs. Abs and Pferdmenges. New plans to integrate dimensions of the French with the British military structures, reportedly being discussed within the British official circles, appear to overlook these fundamental considerations – given that British policy remains dominated by brainwashed, second-rate people who do not understand, are ignorant of, or refuse to accept, the reality that long-range pan-German DVD strategy is viscerally opposed to the continued existence of Britain as an independent country – just as it is focused on building ‘the Thousand-Year Reich on the ruins of the United States’.

NON MERCI! IL FAUT TOUT D’ABORD QUE VOUS VOUS DEBARRASSEZ DES ALLEMANDS
The current wheeze in London is that a new revival of the Edwardian ‘entente cordiale’ would be appropriate, given Britain’s weakened position following the corruption of elements of the City of London by the DVD-serving Bush-worshipping George Bush Center for Intelligence, Langley, VA.

Such a démarche should not even be contemplated unless and until France denounces and exits from the 1963 Treaty of the Elysée with Germany. Otherwise further entanglement with France will simply mask further lethal entanglement with the long-range subversion strategy implemented by the secret pan-Germans – which the prevailing financial showdown is, at least, destabilising.

The offensive against Britain and the British Monarchy is being directed from three centres: Germany (Dachau) itself; the Germanophile component of the subversive Bush-corrupted US Intelligence Power; and Germany’s wartime ally, Japan, also known to be targeting British power, which is extensively centred within the British Monarchical Power.

A constant campaign of vituperative venom, very typical of familiar old Nazi hate propaganda, is disseminated via several notorious US websites – with no tangible impact other than to confuse Americans who do not possess access to the underlying accurate information, or who want their prejudices reinforced. These cynical CIA/DVD Psy-Ops activities are leading nowhere, given the prevailing ‘evolution of events’ (to cite Lenin); but are cruelly misleading Americans who deserve better than to be constantly lied to by operatives working for the criminalised Intelligence Power which is itself an instrument of foreign interests.

SCANDAL OF WALL-TO-WALL U.S. OFFICIAL PSY-OPS AGAINST AMERICANS
The barrage of disinformation directed at well-meaning Americans by evil elements within the US official structures is, of course, an ongoing scandal of immense proportions which no-one in the United States seems to be interested in addressing. People with influence and contacts that we know well, seem to accept this state of affairs as perfectly normal. It is NOT in any way normal for a Government to deploy crude Psy-Ops specialists and agents of influence whose job is to spew out disinformation and lies 24/7 for the specific purpose of deceiving and misleading its own people.

This abomination has matured from the poisonous Operation Mockingbird, the CIA’s Psy-Ops offensive against, and to subvert, the US media implemented during the Cold War period – with the covert aim of preventing the press from investigating embarrassing and criminal operations by the Intelligence Power itself as it consolidated its control over the US Federal Government structures behind the Cold War smokescreen – becoming far more of a menace than the GRU-KGB ever was.

This monstrous, self-financing, criminalised US ‘State within the State’ – which will tolerate no interference with its criminal operations, is responsible for perpetrating the biggest portfolio of criminal finance scams in history, and has absolutely no intention of reforming itself – is thought to have perpetrated three or more hidden giga-scams that are comparable in size to the incredible CMKM/CMKX phantom shares fraud that we have exposed on this website. We are aware of two comparable scams in the United States, and another in Canada (which has been comprehensively corrupted by the Bush Crime Syndicate operations there, FBI Division Five which sits inside the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the compromised Canadian intelligence community, and a number of well-known Canadian banks). The US Intelligence Power recognises no limitations to its arrogant abuse of the power that it has usurped from the American people and that it deploys to coerce and subjugate the Executive Branch, in particular.

C.I.A. SCAMS INSIDE GOVERNMENT AS WELL AS THE PRIVATE SECTOR
Enron was NOTHING compared to what is emerging as this monstrosity’s financial and related crimes – dancing to the tune of the Bush and Clinton DVD Crime sub-Syndicates of the George Bush Center for Intelligence, Langley (which in turn serves even darker interests identified at the top of this report) – are progressively being exposed.

For the US Intelligence Power has penetrated and subverted not just the Financial Sector, both at home and internationally – exporting its corruption abroad in order to escape the US monopolies and securities legislation, and maximising the potential for perpetrating ever more open-ended fraudulent finance operations at home under cover of the National Security Act of 1947 et seq. (a crooks’ charter) – but has, in parallel, exploited its entrée inside official structures, such as the SEC, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the CIA itself and the Pentagon (the Halliburton scamming operations) to perpetrate unspeakable frauds against targeted constituencies from inside the Government itself. After all, since the White House has for years been doing not a lot else but engage in open-ended corrupt financial operations, what’s the problem?

This abominable US Intelligence Power monstrosity needs to be decapitated, decimated, trampled under foot, and buried in concrete. Furthermore, when that imperative reform finally takes place, as it surely will – given the extreme shocks in store – not a single member of its corrupted staff should be ever eligible for re-employment in a new, slimmed-down US intelligence sector subject to proper checks and balances with very sharp teeth.

If you say this can’t happen, you have already fallen victim to a central ingredient of the cynical CIA Psy-Ops offensive that’s being waged at maximum intensity against the American people – namely, a defeatist mentality. They want you to think like that – because defeatism protects their continued illegitimate hegemony. But everything’s collapsing onto their heads now, we think.

FACT: These people CAN be defeated. Look what immense progress has been made since it ceased to be the case that they always got their own way. Further progress is being made every day, and the pace at which these people are being destabilised is rapidly accelerating. Remember: They never thought there could ever be any real opposition, so they weren’t prepared for it when it materialised: and they have been scared and on the defensive ever since.

The fact is, they don’t have the initiative, although they may kid themselves that they do: all of us who are standing up to these vermin, have the initiative. These CIA marionettes are spinning like tops. Many may wind up spinning in their graves or dangling from George H. W. Bush’s lamp posts. And an awful lot of people are likely to wind up in jail.

‘SORCHA FAAL’ WARMONGERING’ AGITPROP OPERATION
RUN BY AN OFFICE OF NAVAL INTELLIGENCE AGENT FROM VIENNA, VA
One egregious example of the contemporary manifestation of Operation Mockingbird, which we have exposed several times already in this column, is the fake so-called ‘Sorcha Faal’ operation.

These reports typically begin with the weasel phrase ‘Rumours circulating in the Kremlin today’ or else ‘Reports circulating in the Kremlin today’, for the purpose of conning the gullible reader into believing that he or she is reading inside information from Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) or the successors to the KGB (FSB). As the Editor of Soviet Analyst, the Editor of this service is naturally aware of the fact that, as we have said before, the Kremlin doesn’t ‘DO’ rumours. So it is incredible that such a naïve and uneducated ploy has any traction at all.

As we have stated on several occasions in the past, the ‘Sorcha Faal’ warmongering drivel – much of which agitates for a world war as soon as possible, it seems – is disseminated by an Office of Naval Intelligence operative named J. Forrest Sharpe, working out of Vienna, VA.

The Office of Naval Intelligence is one of the snakepits within the US Intelligence Power that has been most viciously scrabbling, for years, to control the money. Its warmongering agitation and propaganda is associated with the ‘War Party’ who imagine that the financial crisis can be buried beneath the rubble of a World War.

This is an extremely malicious disinformation operation serving the interests of a particularly nasty component of the US Intelligence Power: ONI has a reputation of being much the most ruthless and aggressively dangerous of the various CIA ‘subsidiary’ and competing entities which are often at loggerheads with each other.

On 2nd February 2010, the Editor of this service emailed David M. Dastych, a Polish journalist and ‘former’ intelligence operative based in Warsaw, to inform him of the above facts, given allusions to Sorcha Faal disinformation in one of his reports (although Mr Dastych was not in fact buying the line). At 17:06 UK time (same day), the Editor received this response from Mr Dastych:

Dear Mr Story

I’ve checked about J. Forrest Sharpe and his publications. You’re perfectly right, this ONI officer pretends to be “SORCHA FAAL” and his publications pretend to be from a “rumour mill” of the Kremlin and the Russian Intelligence [services] (GRU, FSB).

My respect.

David Dastych.

WHY THE EAVESDROPPERS ROUTINELY SHOOT THEMSELVES IN THEIR CLUB FEET
The incident at 1:45pm UK time on 2nd February, itemised above, when the mention of the stealing of The Queen’s gold in a transatlantic telephone call was immediately followed by loud electronic jamming (which however was not replicated when the Editor called back a few minutes later), is simply the latest in a long line of such interferences with our communications which have confirmed or reconfirmed elements of research on which we were working.

Of these incidents, the previously most important occasion was a conversation in 2006 between the Editor in London, Mr Wanta in Wisconsin and ‘Mr Nasty’ (Thomas Henry) in Nebraska, in which the Editor mentioned in a few words his analysis of pan-German long-range subversion strategy and its implementation against the ‘Main Enemy’ (Britain and the United States) by the Nazi-DVD.

This ‘unexpected’ observation by the Editor – based, by the way, on documentary evidence, as well as on ongoing research – was immediately greeted not by one, but by no less than THREE gasps – none of which were emitted by parties to the conversation. Bearing in mind that Wanta answers the phone with ‘Guten Tag’, this was ‘quite interesting’.

All our phone calls (domestic as well as international) are listened to, and one can hear the various despicable eavesdroppers clicking in one after the other. These people may not understand that this behaviour is not merely tacky and sordid: it also enables us to inform them what we want them to know. It’s a two-way street. They probably never thought of that.

THE HIDEOUS FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC ‘SHOCKS’ IN STORE
Finally, as we recently reported, the Barack Obama Administration will have the distinction of having presided over the accumulation of $4.5 trillion of Treasury ‘background’ debt – all of it wholly unnecessary – in the space of just two years. But it took from 1913 to 1994 for the US Treasury to incur Gross Federal Debt (as reported) of $4,643,307 million – and until 2005, if the Office of Management and Budget’s ‘smoke and mirrors’ device, mandated by Statute, whereby the surpluses in the so-called Trust Funds are ‘invested in’ the Federal Funds, is used as the measure.

Now as we have repeatedly stated, incurring this vast accumulation of new US ‘Trashets’ debt is wholly unnecessary, and therefore represents a further form of Financial Terrorism against the American people. Because if the Group of Seven-mandated Dollar Refunding Programme, requiring a regular calendar of fully taxable, transparent, on-the-books trades to take place on a continuing basis, had been implemented, the US Treasury Department would long since have been at the receiving end of a cascade of windfall tax receipts at 35% per trade – and wouldn’t have needed to have incurred much, or any, of this extra garbage debt at all.

Of course, implementation of this scheme would have, and will, knock out clandestine, off-balance sheet, tax-evasive derivatives trading, with the proceeds stashed in offshore bank accounts. But the proceeds from these discredited money laundering operations are basically stuck offshore anyway, and cannot be surfaced onto the balance sheet under Basel II and Basel III, except through crooked banks – making a laughable mockery of the observable persistent intent among bankers generally to try to rehabilitate fully the discredited derivatives mayhem.

THE LATEST AVAILABLE DERIVATIVES NOTIONAL VALUE DATA
To some extent, according to Bank for International Settlements data, the derivatives sector was somewhat restored in the first half of 2009 – given that, after peaking at $683,725 billion in June 2008, the notional derivatives contracts amount outstanding had ‘recovered’ to $604,622 billion by the end of June 2009 (taking account of double-counting) compared with the reported aggregate of $547,371 billion to which this notional figure had slumped by the end of December 2008.

That collapse had represented a notional value wipeout of no less than $136.4 trillion in the space of six months (actually, from mid-September to December 2008). In the first half of 2009, the notional value of derivatives contracts outstanding was clawed back up by $57.3 trillion, a 42% ‘recovery’ – indicating loud and clear that no lessons whatsoever had been learned from what happened, and that the financial community wasn’t inclined, even in the face of the massive slap in the face that it received from mid-September 2008 onwards, to go back to school.

CONGRESS SLAPPED IN THE FACE AS WELL: BY NEIL BAROFSKY
This is not only the view of our soundest advisers, but it is echoed by the only figure other than Paul Volcker within the Obama Firmament who has been talking any sense at all – namely, Mr Neil Barofsky, the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, whom the Obama Administration are obtusely ignoring.

As required by law, Mr Barofsky delivered a 224-page quarterly report to Congress on 30th January 2010, in which he yet again complained that Congress had been fiddling while Washington, DC, burned. US policymakers, he reiterated, had taken NO STEPS SO FAR to address the fundamental problem that triggered the financial crisis.

• Mr Barofsky did, however, reveal the small matter of 40-odd investigations into misappropriation of the $700 billion of TARP money (which was exactly what we had predicted in late 2008 when the criminal financier Paulson was orchestrating that operation). The $700 billion was leveraged to at least $23 trillion – which, by the way, belongs exclusively to the American people, as it’s ALL been stolen. ‘The money you make exploiting my money is my money’.

Specifically, Barofsky berated Congress, saying that ‘it is hard to see how any of the fundamental problems in the system have been addressed to date’. Echoing views expressed to us repeatedly by the securities expert, Michael C. Cottrell, Mr Barofsky elaborated that the bailout ‘will have been for naught if we do nothing to correct the fundamental problems in our financial system and [we will] end up in a similar or even greater crisis in two, or five, or ten years’ time’.

FOR ‘FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEMS’ READ: RAMPANT CRIMINALITY
However the ‘fundamental problems’ embrace rampant criminality inside the highest ranks of the US Federal Government, starting at the White House, the Treasury, the Federal Reserve and, of course, the criminalised Intelligence Power, which controls all three. The only progress that has been made in this connection has resulted from the determined opposition that the serpents have encountered not from within the Government’s own structures – but from beyond.

Like everyone else except this service, Mr Barofsky is unwilling to use straightforward words and phrases like ‘fraud’, scam’, ‘corruption’, ‘criminal finance’ – for fear of offending, in this context, US legislators who are themselves involved in clandestine money-laundering, tax evasion, Fraudulent Finance, and other manifestations of Financial Terrorism. We understand that when Paul Volcker testified before Congress on 3rd February 2010, it was possible to tell, from the questioning, which legislators had been bribed by Bernanke, Panetta, Geithner, or all of the above.

• And yes, as he can’t bring himself to use the appropriate vocabulary, Mr Barofsky naturally ALSO avoids mentioning Financial and Economic Terrorism altogether.

BANKERS AT DAVOS REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN AT LOGGERHEADS
The gravely damaged financial system, rotten to the core, and riddled with cancerworm, cannot be ‘repaired’ until the contemporary preference for Fraudulent Finance is cauterised first. Judging by reports of stand-up rows behind the scenes at bankers’ meetings in Davos, the self-destructing, complacent Wall Street, London, Paris, Zurich and Frankfurt élites, are losing their cool – as they contemplate the wreckage brought about by their own unfettered criminality and greed.

Yet by all accounts, their attitude is that any reforms that belatedly emerge from the US legislative process, and from the confused goings-on in London, they will be able to circumvent.

If that’s their attitude, Neil Barofsky’s two-year timeframe is much too optimistic. When inflation primed by this unprecedented outbreak of monetary waywardness and permissiveness takes off, the nitro-glycerine will be ignited – and the last chance to prevent a global calamity will have been squandered by these greedy money-lending opportunists, who have so far escaped scot-free from the consequences of their financial criminality (give or take their bonuses).

Two generations ago, these people would have been shot at dawn for speculation in time of war. They may fear that a similar fate awaits them ‘down the pike’ – so they may prefer to grab what they can now, before the destruction for which they and their criminalist associates in high places are responsible, drags them down to economic hell along with everyone else.

U.S. CROOKS REPORTED TO BE FLEEING THE COUNTRY
It is reported to us (as has been the case at tense stages of this crisis in the past) that criminal financiers are fleeing the United States – taking some of their loot with them. This time round, however, the reports have an urgency about them that we hadn’t noted on earlier occasions.

Fleeing abroad won’t do them much good, for two reasons. First, if they touch the funds, they will immediately be fingered. Secondly, they are just as likely, if not more so, to be picked up in Europe, than in the United States.

INTERPOL are on worldwide alert for these criminals, and the British and European anti-terrorism legislation has very nasty, sharp teeth. So come on over, folks: our cops will happily pick you up.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• BEWARE OF MALICIOUS IMITATIONS: It has come to our notice that certain websites have been in the habit of copying reports from this site, attributing the reports to the Editor of this service, but at the same time AMENDING AND INSERTING TEXT NOT WRITTEN BY THE EDITOR.

• This is a very old, malevolent US counterintelligence DIRTY TRICK.

Therefore, you should be advised that the GENUINE ORIGINAL REPORT is, by obvious definition, accessible ONLY FROM THIS WEBSITE. If you come across an article elsewhere that is attributed to the Editor of this service, you should refer to the ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE and you should bear in mind that the illegally duplicated article may contain text that was NOT written by the Editor of this service, but which was inserted for malicious purposes by counterintelligence.

Likewise, although we haven’t yet had time to elaborate this issue, we have taken drastic steps around the world to close off the malicious piracy of our books. One technique used by several disreputable sites (in the United States, the Netherlands and Switzerland) is to copy our title(s) and (a) to display an image of the front cover WITHOUT THE ISBN DATA at the top of the cover; and (b) to DELETE THE COPYRIGHT PAGE. In so doing, the criminal pirates proclaimed that they knew perfectly well that they were/are engaged in theft and can be prosecuted for stealing copyright.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

OPERATION STILLPOINT TO DESTROY AMERICA STOPPED

LONG-RANGE SUBVERSION STRATEGY THWARTED BY INTERNATIONAL ACTION

Thursday 7 January 2010 04:30

PENDING SMKM/CMKX CASE AGAINST THE S.E.C. WILL BE THE BIGGEST FRAUDULENT FINANCE LAWSUIT IN HISTORY: MASSIVE SCAMMING PLATFORM RUN BY BUSH JR.’S S.E.C.

• BELATED CHRISTMAS MESSAGE ON TEMPTATION: The Editor is most appreciative of the many kind emails from all over the world received in response to the late Christmas essay posted on 4th January. It appears that the enemies of the Lord took violent exception to the appearance of this straightforward literate New Testament essay, because their response has been to make idiots of themselves by leaving satanic rituals, including the complete initiation of a young woman victim to the worship of satan, on our voicemail. Naturally such stupidities have no effect, and neither do the foolish curses which the posting evoked from these deluded and lost cowards. However such evil behaviour calls for an appropriate response and so, before beginning the shattering report that follows, we append below the verses from the Gospel of John that apply to this situation:

‘For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life‘.

‘For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved’.

‘He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God’.

‘And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil’.

‘For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh he to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved’.

‘But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God’. Gospel of John, Chapter 3, verses 16-21.

• OPERATION STILLPOINT TO ‘TAKE DOWN’ THE UNITED STATES

• A FIVE-PHASE, LONG-RANGE SUBVERSION OPERATION

• OPERATION STILLPOINT NEUTRALISED BY EVENTS IN DECEMBER 2009

• CRUCIAL MEASURES TO BACK UP THE $47 TRILLION LIEN ON THE TREASURY

• INTERPOL’S DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY AND HABEAS CORPUS

• ALL MONEY SABOTEURS = ECONOMIC TERRORISTS

• EVERYBODY INVOLVED IN DEFRAUDING THE UNITED STATES IS TO BE TARGETED

• CHANGE OF ATTITUDE NOTED IN CERTAIN QUARTERS

• THE PENDING CMKM/CMKX LAWSUIT AGAINST THE S.E.C.:
THE BIGGEST FRAUDULENT FINANCE SUIT IN HISTORY

• THE CASE THAT WILL CRACK THE CRISIS WIDE OPEN

• MASSIVE PONZI SCAM RUN FROM WITHIN BUSH’S S.E.C.

• CIVIL WAR WITHIN THE INTELLIGENCE POWER

• ‘C.I.A. ASSASSINS EXECUTED BY ORDER FROM WASHINGTON’ IN ANOTHER COVER-UP

• C.I.A. SPIN-DOCTOR TRIES TO OBFUSCATE THE SITUATION

• WHITE HOUSE WISES UP TO THE INTERNAL TREACHERY

• OBAMA KICKS BUTT AFTER RETURNING FROM HAWAII

• RICHARD WOLF ALLUDES TO ROGUE OPS. INSIDE THE STRUCTURES

• WHITE HOUSE PENETRATIONS ‘SENT MESSAGES TO OBAMA’

• FURTHER ACTIONS TAKEN AGAINST THE BUSHSNAKES

• OTHER RELEVANT DEVELOPMENTS SINCE WE LAST REPORTED

• DIARY OF EVENTS FOLLOWING 28TH DECEMBER 2009

• ‘LONG AFTER THE HORSE HAS BOLTED’ CORNER

• 1: FINRA HAS JUST STARTED LOOKING INTO CDOs

• 2: THE GOLDMAN SACHS ‘CONTROVERSY’

• 3: SHENZHEN NANSHAN POWER VS. GOLDMAN SACHS

• 4: MORGAN STANLEY SUED OVER A CDO

• 5: FALCONE IN LEGAL CONTROVERSY

• 6: HR 4173: THE WALL STREET REFORM AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT

• DOCUMENTED EXPOSURE OF OPERATION STILLPOINT

• BRIEF PROLOGUE:
HOW THE EDITOR ‘RODE THE BEAST’

• OPERATION STILLPOINT IN WANTA’S OWN WORDS

• WANTA’S STILLPOINT COMMUNICATION TO OBAMA
ON THE DAY OF THE ATTEMPTED AIRCRAFT BOMBING

• GORBACHEV: WORLD REVOLUTION EMINENCE GRISE IN THE WOODWORK

• EVIDENCE ON OPERATION STILLPOINT PROVIDED BY WANTA ON 28TH SEPTEMBER 2006

• OPERATION STILLPOINT CONTINUED RIGHT UP TO THE THE $47 TRILLION LIEN

• NAMES OF ELECTED AND APPOINTED U.S. OFFICIALS IMPLICATED
IN OPERATION STILLPOINT ACCORDING TO THIS DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE

BACK-UP OFFICIALLY-SOURCED EVIDENCE DATED NOVEMBER 2009

OVERALL ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION

DELUSIONS OF AUTHORITY WHICH DOES NOT EXIST

THE U.S. INTELLIGENCE POWER: A MENACE TO THE WHOLE WORLD

ADDENDUM:
HR 4173: THE WALL STREET REFORM AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

‘Seeing what’s at the end of one’s nose requires constant effort’. George Orwell.

‘If you think you’re too small to make a difference,
try sleeping in a closed room with a mosquito’. African proverb.

• FOR SEVERAL YEARS WE HAVE CARRIED THIS RUBRIC AT THE FOOT OF EACH REPORT:

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice are comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor’s study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing global financial corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Just press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard. Or press the live Donate link at the top right-hand corner of this page. See also the ADVERTISEMENT below.

• See the SECOND WHITE PANEL ON THE HOME PAGE for updated information on our very latest subscription-based print publications, including Economic Intelligence Review, Arab-Asian Affairs, Soviet Analyst and Global Analyst. The updates provide outline summaries of the subjects covered, most of which are immediately relevant to these reports, which supplement the serials.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation, are appended at the foot of this report, below the legal data. See also our catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and our ‘politically incorrect’ intelligence books online from this website.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

OPERATION STILLPOINT TO ‘TAKE DOWN’ THE UNITED STATES
We are now in a position to tear part of the veil away from the secret stage on which saboteurs operating from WITHIN US Government structures have been systematically, over a prolonged period of years, seeking to do nothing less than seize the assets of the entire United States and its people, in a mad revolutionary offensive to convert the country into a fiefdom controlled by a small clique of arrogant maniacs.

This will require patience on the part of the reader, as historical references will be necessary in order to bring this scandalous state of affairs to life, and to expose what has been going on.

The last time an attempt was made by the Fifth Column buried inside the Intelligence Power and scattered around other structures was in 1984, with the previous Dollar Refunding Operation.

A FIVE-PHASE, LONG-RANGE SUBVERSION OPERATION
In essence and in outline, the secret offensive against the United States and its people directed from within by subversives headed by George Bush Sr. and his controller-handler, Dr Henry ‘Heinz’ Kissinger, and micromanaged by Bush Sr.’s criminal financier Dr Alan Greenspan, with embedded participation of Leo/Lee Wanta, involved the following intended stages:

• Stage 1:
Developing myriad Ponzi schemes and giga-thefts, of infinite variety, and BY ANY MEANS, in order to procure ‘base money’ for open-ended unreported, off-balance sheet, untaxed leveraging and hypothecation operations.

• Stage 2:
Maximising the potential for the accumulation of trillions of fiat dollars by means of such financial sorcery, both for personal self-enrichment purposes and in order to accumulate a colossal fund of fiat ‘money’ from Fraudulent Finance operations, ready for Stage 3.

• Stage 3:
Deliberately inducing the collapse of the US financial system and economy to facilitate Stage 4:

• Stage 4:
Mobilising the colossal accumulated portfolio of Fraudulent Funds, stashed offshore and untaxed, with a view to buying up collapsed US assets across the board, so that the entire economy wound up in the hands of the controlling saboteurs.

• Stage 5:
The ELIMINATION of commercial banking and its replacement by the US Treasury’s Direct Account.

The codename for this operation, directed from within the deeply compromised and penetrated US Government structures, was, and remains to this day, OPERATION STILLPOINT.

This offensive against the United States directed from WITHIN the US official structures, despite setbacks, including the recovery (for which we were partly responsible) of the British Monarchical Power’s gold diverted with inside connivance at the Bank of England on 29th-30th March 2007, was STILL on course for completion but was knocked decisively off-course following the ‘lockdown’ of the $14.0+ trillion of sovereign funds, including the $6.2 trillion of funding provided on LOAN for the G-7-approved on-balance sheet Dollar Refunding Programme on 10th-12th September 2008. These funds were simply regarded by the criminal Paulson Treasury as candidates for diversion and exploitation, rather than for application for the purposes intended by the owners of the funds.

OPERATION STILLPOINT NEUTRALISED BY EVENTS IN DECEMBER 2009
OPERATION STILLPOINT was finally DEFEATED with the confirmation, application and decisive consequences of the sovereign lenders’ Writ of Execution, followed by imposition of the massive Lien against the US Treasury for $47 trillion which the defrauded parties, the Chinese authorities and the British Monarchical Power, had to execute on or about 6th December 2009.

However, notwithstanding that OPERATION STILLPOINT has been destabilised, degraded, collapsed and is in the process of being dismantled – and the Republic therefore prospectively rescued at the last moment from what was intended by its sworn enemies – certain operatives, including Leon Panetta, Timothy Geithner, Mrs Hillary Clinton, former Vice President Richard B. Cheney and, at the bottom of the pile of snakes, Wanta, have had a problem getting used to the NEW PARADIGM, whereby the subversives engaged in the systematic sabotage of the ongoing US financial restitution operations (in order to ‘rescue’ OPERATION STILLPOINT), have now been placed not only firmly on the defensive, but in a bind from which they cannot extricate themselves (even though their arrogance remains such that they imagine that they can).

OPERATION STILLPOINT, re-invoked in sterile fashion by Wanta in November 2007 to trigger the domino effect, was put together by the traitors George Bush Sr. and Dr Alan Greenspan. When the exposures and the September 2008 ‘lockdown’ stymied the Paulson Treasury, strenuous efforts were made to saddle (intended) President Obama with a team of colleague-snakes who could be relied upon to revive, perpetuate and conclude OPERATION STILLPOINT beyond Stage 2. This team of traitors is now under intense pressure, as indeed are ALL personnel within and beyond the US official structures who have participated in these unending criminal operations, serving the interests of enemy foreign powers, to bring the United States and its people to their knees

CRUCIAL MEASURES TO BACK UP THE $47 TRILLION LIEN ON THE TREASURY
As indicated, patience on the part of the reader is necessary because we first have to address the present situation, which is explosive and historically unprecedented. Specifically:

• INTERPOL’S DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY AND HABEAS CORPUS:
For the purposes of surmounting this crisis, and FOR NO OTHER PURPOSE, contrary to the ignorant knee-jerk chatter on many websites, President Barack Obama promulgated Executive Order 13524 on 16th December 2009, which amended Executive Order 12425 dated 16th June 1983 (amended by the Executive Order 12971 dated 15th September 1995) so as ‘to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities of the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL)’.

• The effect of President Obama’s Executive Order of 16th December 2009 is to grant INTERPOL full immunity from search and arrest or seizure of all INTERPOL properties including the agency’s own personnel, thereby providing INTERPOL with de facto diplomatic immunity.

This is a truly historic development, because it means that for the purposes of resolving this crisis HABEAS CORPUS IS SUSPENDED. The last time this happened was under President Lincoln.

The US Government has surrendered its authority to an international organisation charged with investigating corruption inside the US Government’s own structures. The United States has not been sovereign since the Lien Holders had to proceed with executing their Lien on or about 6th December 2009, but will of course resume its sovereign status on satisfaction of the Lien.

With Habeas Corpus suspended for the purposes strictly of procuring compliance with the Writ of Enforcement and the huge Lien against the US Treasury and thus the (legitimate) Settlements, the heavily armed status of INTERPOL and other foreign enforcement personnel that are operating under diplomatic cover to bring this crisis to resolution on behalf of the injured parties, the myriad Ponzi victims of the Syndicate’s schemes, the United States, the American people and the Rest of the World, can be more readily appreciated.

• ALL MONEY SABOTEURS = ECONOMIC TERRORISTS
As revealed in our 28th December report, on the basis of information divulged to us on 26th December 2009, the US Department of Justice within the Executive Branch has implemented a fundamental POLICY CHANGE, having determined in December, against the background of the execution of the Lien for $47 trillion against the US Treasury, that:

• ALL individuals and entities within the US jurisdiction that have participated in the stealing, diversion and conversion of funds belonging to others, INCLUDING past and present officials within the US Government and its structures, WILL BE INVESTIGATED AND PROSECUTED FOR ECONOMIC TERRORISM perpetrated against the United States and the American people (and the Rest of the World). Specifically:

• ANYONE, whether officials in, or formerly in Government, whether CEOs of financial institutions or lower-ranking bankers, partners in ‘involved’ US law firms, all intermediaries and intelligence operatives and others who have been engaged in obstructing the Settlements process by ANY MEANS AND AT ANY TIME IN THE PAST, and who have, by their actions, contributed to the DELAY, are being treated forthwith as ECONOMIC TERRORISTS – by the US justice system itself.

• Perpetrating ECONOMIC TERRORISM will be, and is, to be treated as TREASON by virtue of the fact that it entails DECLARING ECONOMIC WARFARE AGAINST THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ITS PEOPLE, AND AIDING AND ABETTING THE ENEMIES OF THE UNITED STATES.

• The penalty for TREASON IN TIME OF WAR is summary execution.

• This decision PRECISELY REFLECTS what we have been proclaiming in this column for the past three years. We are informed that the US Justice Department has at long last understood what we have been saying, and has been galvanised by the horrendous implications for the $47 trillion Lien on the US Treasury and its decisive ramifications, into adopting the foregoing as RIGID OFFICIAL POLICY from which no deviation will be permitted.

• It follows that the US Attorney General and all the State Attorneys General are obliged to act vigorously on the basis of the POLICY CHANGE, or they themselves can and will be arrested for obstruction of justice by INTERPOL personnel and then extradited to a jurisdiction such as the British jurisdiction for defying obligations imposed on them by International Law.

• It should NOT be assumed that this POLICY CHANGE arises because of a change of heart at the US Department of Justice (resulting for instance from reading our reports). On the contrary:

• This POLICY CHANGE is a direct consequence of the situation arising from the implementation of the Lien and the drastic enforcement measures that are being taken inside the United States by the international cadres and ‘men in suits’ referenced in recent reports. President Obama’s Executive Order Amending Executive Order 12425 dated 16th December and publicised by the Office of the Press Secretary, White House, on 17th December 2009 [see above], to ‘extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL)’ is associated with this POLICY CHANGE at the US Department of Justice.

• Finally, since this is, as reiterated, an official POLICY CHANGE, its full implementation is NOT dependent upon finalisation of the Settlements. This reality should quickly lodge itself inside the brains of the official and financial sector criminal financiers and thieves, who face investigation and prosecution ANYWAY. Obviously, if they persist with their obstruction, thefts and diversionary operations, they will be increasing their chances of being summarily executed for treason.

• EVERYBODY INVOLVED IN DEFRAUDING THE UNITED STATES IS TO BE TARGETED:
Although this fact is confirmed above, it was REITERATED with further emphasis to this service on 3rd January that EVERYBODY, without exception, who has been involved and remains involved in defrauding the United States and the American people is going to be investigated.

CHANGE OF ATTITUDE NOTED IN CERTAIN QUARTERS
This development has almost immediately resulted in a previously unheard-of ‘sudden amendment’ of the ‘attitudes’ and visibility of certain parties that are known to this service and to its advisers. People inside the structures are stunned and are scurrying for whatever shelter they think may protect them from the consequences of their corrupt activities. Furthermore, the same applies to certain collaborating parties outside the United States.

Members of the US Congress and officials at the Departments of State, Justice and in the White House, as well as within the vast Intelligence Power’s structures, the Pentagon and elsewhere, and in foreign governments and their structures, are reported to be quote ‘falling over themselves’ to avoid the axes that are falling from the sky, taking aim at their necks. Never have so many officials in the United States and other countries been so scared of what lies in store – for them personally.

• Stony silence on these developments:
No doubt alert readers will have observed that no substantive notice of the above, after we had reported it all on 28th December 2009, was taken by certain websites which purport to exist to enlighten the US public but which in reality specialise in maximising the potential for confusion in order to sustain the orchestrated but collapsing smokescreeen behind which these abominations, and OPERATION STILLPOINT, were being perpetrated.

This silence provides prima facie evidence that the US websites in question have indeed been involved, as we have suggested in the past, in the massive orchestrated agitprop and cover-up operation that has had to be mounted by the compartmentalised sleaze cadres to obfuscate the systematic treachery against the United States, which is without historical precedent in terms of the scale of this operation.

• President Obama’s private hell:
Faced with this unprecedented state of affairs, President Barack Obama’s backbone appears to have been stiffened, given the extremes of treachery seen within his own Cabinet and among his colleagues. In a revealing caption on 2nd January 2010, The Daily Telegraph noted: ‘President Obama looked weary after repeated interruptions to deal with the aftermath of the syringe bomber plot’ [sic, as incorrectly assumed by the caption writer]. ‘An aide insisted that the 48-year-old found his holiday “rejuvenating”, but his graying hair and drawn look seemed to tell another story’.

Some of the factors causing Mr Obama’s hair to turn white – which can happen to people wracked by anxiety and stress – are summarised below. But first:

THE PENDING CMKM/CMKX LAWSUIT AGAINST THE S.E.C.:
THE BIGGEST FRAUDULENT FINANCE SUIT IN HISTORY
Lawyers acting for CMKM (CMKX) investors have prepared an immense class action lawsuit against the Securities and Exchange Commission and its Commissioners individually and severally claiming compensation in respect of 3.5 billion legitimate shares, seeking release of all the funds that have been collected (DTCC) for the sole benefit of CMKM/CMKX shareholders… for damages in excess of $3.87 trillion, based on allegations that the S.E.C. invented 2.25 trillion of PHANTOM SHARES in CMKM/CMKX stock, which were exploited and traded illegally given that the phantom shares were of course fraudulent and that stock did not, therefore, exist legally – scooping vast illicit scamming profits which were stashed off-balance sheet – in a colossal Ponzi operation perpetrated by the S.E.C. itself in collaboration with George H. W. Bush. George W. Bush, and other Bush Crime Family associates. THIS WILL BE THE BIGGEST OFFICIAL FRAUD CASE IN WORLD HISTORY.

When filed, this lawsuit will almost certainly be the development that will crack the immense edifice of systemic and deliberately subversive official corruption wide open and force it into the public domain once and for all – because the so-called ‘mainstream’ media wil surely be obliged, given the unprecedented size of this lawsuit, to pay attention to this one.

Of course, they will probably immediately get the wrong end of the stick, assuming (‘under advice’) that this was ‘just another giga-scam’ – rather than in reality a further component (albeit a scam without any historical precedent) of the orchestrated offensive perpetrated FROM WITHIN THE U.S. OFFICIAL STRUCTURES against US capitalism and the financial system masterminded by George H.W. Bush and his crime associates and financial technicians: OPERATION STILLPOINT.

And who features among the ‘partners’ of George Bush Sr. within the former Barrington Investment Group, now Deutsche AG, under the control of the DVD’s primary banker, Dr Joseph Ackermann, CEO of Deutsche Bank? Why, the former Leninist President of the Soviet Union, M.S. Gorbachëv.

• Are you beginning to get the picture?

• Recall that German long-range ‘Black’ counterintelligence, the heirs of the Abwehr (DVD), and Soviet ‘Black’ intelligence (fronted these days by Soviet Military Intelligence, GRU, for which ‘Prime Minister’ Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is the public face), work together at high levels against ‘the Main Enemy’ – and have always done so. In this connection, the ‘successors’ to the KGB (FSB) are in charge of the Russian Federation’s outward-facing stance for international public consumption. The FSB operates a presentational policy which is the dialectical (Leninist) opposite of the secret ongoing responsibility and commitment of the GRU to preserve the integrity of the Leninist Party-State and its structures, which went ‘underground’ with the ‘changes’ of 1989-92.

THE CASE THAT WILL CRACK THE CRISIS WIDE OPEN
US authorities were reported to us on 3rd January 2010 to be so worried about this huge pending CMKM/CMKX lawsuit, which had been submitted in outline as a ‘proffer’ to them in advance, that frantic efforts were allegedly being made as this report was being prepared, to locate the $3.87 trillion ‘needed’ to ‘shut the CMKX people up’.

CMKM/CMKX was originally set up from within the CIA as yet another Bush Crime Syndicate-related Ponzi scheme, to finance OPERATION STILLPOINT (like everything else).

Under the original criminal scheme, the Securities and Exchange Commission was to serve (and did serve) as another trading platform for the Bush subversion operation. Originally, the intention had been to conduct this illicit phantom trading op. through the Federal Financing Bank (FFB), a special entity within the US Treasury which has been used over the years for ‘smoke and mirrors’ financial obfuscation purposes, and also to provide the Secretary of the Treasury with up to $15 billion of prospective ‘borrowing space’ (as allowed to the FFB by Statute) when Congress delays the raising of the Statutory Debt Limit, as it does every few years or so in order to remind the US Executive Branch that the Congress is supposed to control the purse strings; but that plan was abandoned when it was found that the FFB was subject to ‘too many restrictions’ which would be inconsistent with the underlying criminal intent.

Ironically, Congress won’t need to raise the Statutory Debt Limit – which is essentially now the sole remaining substantive whip that it can wield to force the Executive to recognise that it controls expenditure – with the start-up of the Dollar Refunding Programme, given that the tax accruals due to the US Treasury arising from the eight weekly trades will in due course obviate the necessity for the Statutory Debt Limit to be raised at all.

• This insight provides a possible explanation, beyond endemic corruption, for the resistance to overall resolution that has been the hallmark of the US Legislature over the years.

MASSIVE PONZI SCAM RUN FROM WITHIN BUSH’S S.E.C.
So the S.E.C. – which is responsible for monitoring the honesty and integrity of securities trades – was itself used as cover to establish and operate an off-balance sheet trading platform which was to be employed to clean up vast accruals by illicit means. This mechanism followed the standard intelligence deception principle that the most effective cover to operate from is from within the entity that is charged with monitoring and exposing the criminal activity to be perpetrated. It’s called a form of ‘sib’ operation.

Under George W. Bush, between June 2004 and 28th October 2005, it is alleged that no less than 2.25 trillion of phantom CMKM/CMKX stock were sold into the stock market under this S.E.C. cover – which has to rank as by far the most brazen Ponzi scam in world history: and one, furthermore, that was set up and perpetrated by and from within the US official structures with the specific intention of ‘screwing’ the investing public, notably the investors in CMKM/CMKX shares.

Of course, the S.E.C. has no right or legitimate power to allow or approve phantom trades to be conducted by its own personnel or on its behalf on an illicit trading platform – an obscenity which calls into question the validity of all its current and former lawsuits against myriad lesser market perpetrators since this unprecedented official Bush-developed financial aberration started.

On the contrary, we would expect market defendants convicted of dodgy dealing to be instructing their lawyers on the basis of this staggering emerging evidence that the Securities and Exchange Commission is itself a criminal enterprise.

Eventually, the illicit CMKM/CMKX proceeds from the PHANTOM SHARE trades were brought back into the Bush-CIA Crime Syndicate’s orbit via Tyler, Texas (Bush territory).

The reason that the CMKM/CMKX investors have legitimacy and standing is that, following an earlier lawsuit, the investors’ case as Ponzi victims, was upheld – so that they are now in the driving seat, even though the original scheme was a CIA front operation.

This state of affairs TERRIFIES multiple perpetrators across the board, and needs to be considered in the context of the CHANGE OF POLICY at the US Department of Justice and INTERPOL’s de facto diplomatic immunity and the consequent implications for Habeas Corpus.

CIVIL WAR WITHIN THE INTELLIGENCE POWER
Not surprisingly, it has become evident, and we are specifically informed, that civil war has broken out within the main flank of the corrupted Intelligence Power.

This was to be expected, given that OPERATION STILLPOINT has been disrupted and that the Bush Syndicate is in the process of being ‘taken down’ – although, unbelievably, Bush Sr. and Barbara were still NOT in custody as of 5th January 2010.

Tensions have erupted between the discredited Bush-DVD Syndicate penetration cadres and elements within the CIA who range from professionals disgusted at the behaviour of their agency (begging the question: they went along with it, so they haven’t a leg to stand on), and operatives who find their noses out of joint for whatever reason (such as non-fulfillment of Pay Orders, which cannot now be fulfilled because they involved financial corruption) may apply. The tensions duly erupted into bloodshed during the holidays.

Specifically, the ‘Black Ops’ specialists, probably directed inter alia by senior CIA operative Mrs Hillary Clinton who disappeared into Afghanistan and the region during the Christmas and New Year period, have been working overtime to develop new terror ‘false flag’ operations, of which the Northwest Airlines Flight 253 near abomination was one example – in time to try, against the odds, to abort the derailing and closedown of OPERATION STILLPOINT – which the stupid ‘Black Ops.’ people don’t appear to have realised is HISTORY. As previously mentioned these liars, deceivers and dealers in murder and the ‘Black arts’ are exceedingly stupid at all times.

On New Year’s Day, The Times (London) and other ‘mainstream’ media reported the furious response of Afghani security chiefs to the cold-blooded murders of at least eight children and teachers during a night raid in Eastern Afghanistan – an outrage that triggered justified mass protests across Afghanistan at the barbarity of these assassinations. The high Afghani officials demanded that the United States must hand over the gunmen who perpetrated these atrocities.

The Afghan National Security Council (modelled along US and Soviet lines), chaired by President Karzai, demanded that ‘those responsible for the deaths of those innocent youths must be handed over to the Afghan Government’. Mr Karzai’s office elaborated: ‘International forces entered the area and killed ten youths, eight of them school students inside two rooms in a house, without encountering any armed resistance’.

The local headmaster, Rahman Jan Ehsas, told The Times that ‘seven of the children were handcuffed before they were shot. A local farm labourer and a shepherd boy were also killed’.

Although (inevitably) a Western official commented that ‘there’s no doubt that there were insurgents in there, and there may well have been an insurgent leader in the house’, he added:

‘But that doesn’t justify executing eight children who were all enrolled in local schools’.

‘C.I.A. ASSASSINS EXECUTED BY ORDER FROM WASHINGTON’ IN ANOTHER COVER-UP
All reports on this incident have so far missed the point, which is illuminated by the sequel – namely that following this massacre, a ‘suicide attacker’ killed eight US civilian operatives.

[Although we are informed that no less than 13 CIA operatives were present at the same time in the remote location – an unbelievable breach of basic security standards].

• These killings took place at a CIA base, Camp Chapman, in Khost, on the Afghan-Pakistani border. Those killed were the CIA ‘Black Ops’ personnel who perpetrated the murders of the children and teachers – to escalate Afghani and Islamic tension generally, in pursuit of an emergency agenda intended to smother inter alia the takedown of OPERATION STILLPOINT.

You don’t believe this? Then let us share some special intelligence with you – obtained, indeed, from intelligence sources. These eight ‘Black Operations’ murderers were themselves liquidated on orders from Washington (probably approved at the highest level, certainly the National Security Council), not as retribution for what they did of course, but because the Afghani authorities were calling (see above) for these US demoniacs to be handed over to the Afghani authorities so that they would appear in Court – unleashing further appalling publicity for the Americans and the CIA, to be splashed around the world’s ‘mainstream’ media.

The Afghans wanted these US bandits under their authority; so the order was placed by US officials for these men to be executed. In other words, yet another CIA-sponsored ‘Black Ops.’ abomination ended in failure and the murder of Americans by the US Government’s own structures – illustrating both the extreme desperation of the Intelligence Power as it is split apart by its internal rivalries and the ongoing but incomplete purge of the Fifth Column saboteurs, and the mental retardation of the out-of-control Fifth Column fools inside the Agency and its subsidiaries and ‘privatised’ cadres who are recklessly plotting these sabotage outrages.

C.I.A. SPIN-DOCTOR TRIES TO OBFUSCATE THE SITUATION
On 4th January 2010, Bruce Riedel, a so-called ‘former’ CIA office and now a ‘White House adviser, suddenly surfaced to promulgate, for public consumption, an obfuscation ‘line’ to the effect that the ‘suicide attacker’ who made certain that the eight (CIA) operatives were duly horizontalised was a Jordanian double agent sent to ‘hunt down top Al-Qaeda leaders’, according to The London Times [5th January 2010]. Mr Riedel even obliged the media with the wholly unnecessary detail of the full-blown name of this now dead attacker: Humam Khalil Abu-Mulal al-Balawi. His intelligence ‘handler’, Ali bin Zeid, was said to have been killed, along with seven (not eight) CIA operatives.

Riedel elaborated with unnecessary and contradictory detail:
‘The officer was also a member of the Hashemite Royal Family, which is part of the reason the King and Queen [of Jordan] attended his funeral, and why he is now being remembered [in Jordan] as a national hero’. (This has indeed been separately confirmed to us).

Spin-doctor Riedel added: ‘The bomber allegedly [sic] was sent by [al-Qaeda’s supposed ‘Number Two’] Ayman al-Zawahiri himself, to conduct the attack’.

No sir. These executions of CIA operatives were ordered from Washington to cover up the latest mad attempt by the stupid demoniacs in the Fifth Column to try to sabotage the de facto takedown of OPERATION STILLPOINT which is happening in ‘real time’ – threatening the continued unhealthy hegemony of the corrupt and evil US Intelligence Power in the process.

WHITE HOUSE WISES UP TO THE INTERNAL TREACHERY:
On 5th January, Webster G. Tarpley, a respected veteran reporter, published an analysis in which he supported our KNOWLEDGE (which is based on intelligence obtained prior to his report) that operations are being and have been run FROM WITHIN THE US OFFICIAL STRUCTURES to try to destabilise President Obama at this critical stage.

However no-one reporting on these matters has yet understood that the underlying rationale for these treasonous operations has to do with the preservation of the Intelligence Power’s collapsing control hegemony, and the stunted mentality of corrupted cadres and their handlers who have not yet wrapped their minds round the reality that OPERATION STILLPOINT is being dismantled.

Of course the problem here is that hardly anyone, even within the compartmentalised elements engaged in these futile and desperate late terrorism operations perpetrated against their own nation, Government and people (not to mention ‘collateral damage’ abroad, which none of them care about), know or have known of the existence of the OPERATION STILLPOINT plot.

(Which also, incidentally, illuminates the folly of those who persist in fomenting the fallout from the orchestrated, partisan campaign against President Barack Obama, which in fact masks the SAME underlying intent – to rescue the desperate American Intelligence Power from its fate, along with OPERATION STILLPOINT, a FOREIGN-inspired long-range deception offensive targeting the US component of the ‘Main Enemy’. So, in persisting with this behaviour, these people are actually, or have been, participating, consciously or unwittingly, in the massive Fifth Column programme to destroy and ‘take down’ the United States. Which is the reverse of what most of these people want. ‘Those whose clothing is made of esparto grass shouldn’t stand too close to the fire’).

OBAMA KICKS BUTT AFTER RETURNING FROM HAWAII
For, make no mistake: President Obama has been ‘kicking butt’ ever since his return from Hawaii. He has realised, not least, that he has no alternative, if he himself wishes to avoid abrupt arrest by INTERPOL for OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE (which is what he was told on 4th January 2010). At the same time, in any case, his first year in office has been completely wasted due to the subversive activities of the high-level saboteurs in his Cabinet and entourage, who were largely foisted upon him – by the recalcitrant, penetrated Intelligence Power.

He needs the money for his programmes (of which one can hardly approve BUT THAT’S NOT THE POINT at this juncture); and he needs the money for the bankrupt US States, and because THIS IS A MID-TERM ELECTION YEAR.

Most of all, he needs resolution so that the poisonous venom of this crisis is finally squeezed out of the system – and so that the axes that are cascading from the sky on numerous brazen, corrupt necks, fall where they are now destined to fall. He’s had enough.

RICHARD WOLF ALLUDES TO ROGUE OPS. INSIDE THE STRUCTURES
Mr Tarpley cited the report by Richard Wolf on a cable network programme, and we’ll let the author speak for himself – correcting him, or elaborating briefly, at the end of these excerpts:

‘Washington, DC: 5th January 2010: Officials in the Obama White House are now considering the possibility that the Christmas Day attempt by Nigerian terrorist Umar Farouk Mutallab to blow up an airliner about to land in Detroit was deliberately and intentionally facilitated by unnamed networks inside the US intelligence community. This was the gist of a report by Richard Wolf delivered in this evening’s edition of cable network’s MSNBC’s Countdown program, hosted by Keith Olbermann….

‘Wolf attributed his account to top officials in the Obama White House. The intentional sabotage of US antiterrorist screening procedures would explain why Mutallab had been able to use his US visa, escape interrogation and special searches, and board the flight, even though he was clearly festooned with every red flag in the annals of airport security.

If Wolf’s report is accurate [of course it is, as far as it goes: Ed.], these Obama officials may well be pulling on a thread which could begin to unravel the entire secret structure of illegitimate power which has afflicted this country – in this case, the apparatus which manufactures terrorist incidents for political purposes of mass manipulation, dictatorship, and war’.

‘Wolf offered two possible explanations cited by his White House sources [sic] for the intentional sabotage of security procedures. The first was a “turf war” inside the intelligence community, with one agency seeking to hoard information and deny it to others’.

‘The second was the intention to ’embarrass some leading figures’, presumably referring to partisan animus or other resentments against Obama and his top appointees’.

Unfortunately, Mr Tarpley, has not been reading our reports – or he would have grasped by now the real reasons for these various grievous intelligence aberrations. But at least we now have a respected US journalist who understands extremely well that the United States’ and the world’s problems originate FROM WITHIN THE U.S. GOVERNMENT’S OWN STRUCTURES – an enormous leap forward which, as he puts it, suggests ‘that all the naïve cover stories are about to collapse in a shock of recognition that networks infesting the US Government do indeed actively create and produce terrorist events for their own evil purposes. We need more mole detectors at the NSC, CIA, State Department, and Pentagon – not more harassment of the traveling public’.

Surely one of the most perceptive, incisive, and deadly accurate bullseyes that we have ever had the honour to report.

WHITE HOUSE PENETRATIONS ‘SENT MESSAGES TO OBAMA’
The scandalous state of affairs which has surfaced following the arrival at a White House State Dinner for the Indian Prime Minister of an uninvited couple, Tareq and Michaele Salahi, has been further aroused with the latest revelation – noted inter alia by Sally Quinn in a Washington Post report on 6th January 2010 – that a third uninvited individual, Carlos Allen, also gate-crashed the State Dinner, passing himself off as a member of the Indian delegation. Ms. Quinn demanded that the White House Social Secretary, Desirée Rogers, a socialite from Chicago, should be made to resign over these incidents.

Once again we have a correspondent who appears to have got the wrong end of the stick. Quinn links the continued presence at the White House of Ms. Rogers to indications that Rahm Emanuel has finally seen the writing on his own wall, and is believed to be considering running for the post of Mayor of Chicago in the current year’s upcoming mid-term elections.

She bases this on indications that Emanuel is said to have told unnamed personnel that the rôle of White House Chief-of-Staff is ‘an 18-month job’ and that he is now considering running for Mayor of Chicago. Since Rogers is reported to be ‘a major social and political player in the Windy City’, Ms. Quinn ‘thinks laterally in the wrong direction’ and wonders whether Rogers hasn’t been sacked because of Mr Emanuel’s political ambitions.

It’s interesting how these American journalists just get it plain wrong because they don’t educate themselves in the affairs of the ‘Black’ Intelligence Community.

So, since we ourselves are somewhat educated in this discipline, let us reinterpret the meaning of these three White House intrusions. Knowing the perverted and otiose mentality of these stupid operatives, it is clear to us that the purpose of the White House intrusions was to impress upon Mr Obama that he isn’t safe ANYWHERE – even inside the White House itself.

In other words, the intrusions were intended to send a message to the President of the United States, from the angered criminalised Intelligence Power, along the familiar lines of: ‘Do what we want or we’ll make sure that you’ll cease to be vertical’.

FURTHER ACTIONS TAKEN AGAINST THE BUSHSNAKES
On 3rd January, we were informed that George Bush Sr. and Barbara Bush have been prevented from touching any money and interfering with banking codes. Furthermore, a very knowledgeable source elaborated: ‘All the money accumulated by (CHENEY’S) Halliburton has been removed, and Bush 41 and Bush 43 have been deprived of all their stolen money as well.

It also transpired that the Bushes were running two additional sets of phony books through false groups – one of which was called ‘Halleluiah Trail’, and another, run out of Europe, containing the name ‘Horizon’. The operators of these fraudulent Ponzi schemes were ordered to reveal and then to disgorge funds held in custody; and when they demurred or stalled, or denied that they held the funds, the operatives concerned were arrested (between New Year’s Day and Sunday 3rd January).

Of critical importance, too, is the fact that the Chinese authorities and the Swiss are refusing point blank to pay ANYTHING at all to the Bushes and their criminal associates.

• That of course means that, as has been plain for months, Wanta, who has ‘worked for’ Bush all along [see below], gets nothing either.

In summary, the Bush-CIA-DVD’s ‘Black Ops.’ Intelligence grabitisation OPERATION STILLPOINT Syndicate is being DISMANTLED in ‘real-time’. It began with the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) ‘sib’ operation, financing wars and destabilisation operations all over the place, creating maximal confusion – from which money was always to be made.

Though lubricated by the Bush-CIA’s criminal drug-trafficking operations and CIA ‘Black’ money derived from innumerable Ponzi schemes and arms manufacturing, as well as by CIA corporations specialising in fraud such as Cheney‘s Halliburton with its scamming departments run from within the CIA and the Pentagon simultaneously, the entire edifice of the Octopus is in free-fall – a reality that its personnel cannot accept, so that they are being arrested, horizontalised or all of the above.

OTHER RELEVANT DEVELOPMENTS SINCE WE LAST REPORTED
Indeed, rearguard resistance continued right through the preparation of this report.

Therefore, the next segment of this report addresses miscellaneous interim developments since we last reported, of which the most important are the following:

• The ongoing audit by foreign personnel (‘men in suits’) of the Federal Reserve, led by Chinese, British and Swiss auditors, continued, we understand, throughout the holiday period. Enforcement personnel remained in place at the Fed to ensure that Settlement funds were/are not diverted in accordance with the Federal Reserve’s normal corrupt procedures.

• During the review period, this service made repeated enquiries as to whether all avenues enabling corrupt diversions of funds into the hands of the Bush-DVD Crime Nexus had been closed. These enquiries were repeatedly answered in the affirmative: in other words, as stated elsewhere, scope for the Bush Syndicate to steal funds appears indeed to have been completely sealed off – indicating that the takedown of OPERATION STILLPOINT is substantive.

• International Monetary Fund:
Under the direction of the former French Finance Minister, M. Dominique Strauss-Kahn, corrupt operations appear to have been brought under control. It is now clear that his predecessor, the Spaniard, De Rato, left after two years in charge, under a cloud. Given George Bush Sr.’s extensive use of Spain as a receiving platform for drug-trafficking proceeds and other exotic illicit funds – and the fact, which we alone publicized, that the Bank of Spain ordered the Bush operatives out of their jurisdiction in 2007, giving them two days’ notice (whereupon the corrupt Bush funds were reported to us to have wound up with the Vatican Bank, controlled by the German-Jewish Pope, Dr Ratzinger, and Dr Tietmeyer, the former president of the Bundesbank) – it is rather clear now that De Rato had to be kicked out of the Fund because of alleged engagement with the Bush Crime Syndicate in connection with OPERATION STILLPOINT.

DIARY OF EVENTS FOLLOWING 28TH DECEMBER 2009

• 28th December: The Editor was reliably informed that ‘a lot of people got busted’ during the past couple of days. As this information came from a figure with rather unsavoury contacts, and similar unconfirmed suggestions to the same effect were received from other sources, we believe this statement to have been accurate.

• 29th December: Between 12 and 14 corrupt bankers were reported to us to have been arrested in London on this date. In Paris, the top Trustee attended at Banque Paribas for the funds release procedure as planned but was subsequently reported to have encountered resistance from Paribas bankers and ended up, as reported to us, ‘shouting and screaming’ at the bankers.

We were also told that the Paris Trustee’s fees were to be paid directly inter alia by President Sarkozy. A key Dallas-based Trustee was reported to be sick in bed with a fever temperature of 102 degrees and was reported to us to have been replaced, having also been identified as ‘dragging his feet’. Although one source denied the above, we ourselves established that INTERPOL had indeed intervened in Paris to replace a senior Trustee, while a key Trustee was detained at a US operations centre and replaced, after he had been engaged in alleged delaying tactics.

• 30th December: Informed sources told us that they were ‘expecting a lot more arrests’.

• 30th December: The funds were ‘dropped down’, i.e., made available gross, at midnight. Funds payable to top Trustees will have been taxed at the Treasury, with the gross amounts payable to Trustee recipients and distributors paid without tax being deducted.

• NOTE: This is a complex area which cannot be fully explained at this stage. On the one hand, it was IMPERATIVE for the gross funds to be made available within 2009 – so that taxes could be taken off the top for crediting within the calendar year 2009 and therefore available for use by the Government on the books within Fiscal Year 2010 – which we know from three sources took place.

Indeed, as indicated, a key broker/Trustee confirmed to us in writing on 1st January at 20:24 pm UK time that he was advised on 30 December by sources in both Europe and the United Kingdom that his taxes had already been deducted. On the other hand, double taxation is illegal, so the amounts that Trustees were to distribute had to be paid out gross – preventing the Obama Government from receiving the sizeable taxation accruals required on-balance sheet IMMEDIATELY, as the US Government is ‘skint’ due to the year that has been wasted in further attempts to revitalise the dying Fraudulent Finance carousel and to rescue OPERATION STILLPOINT pending the decisive action that had to be taken by the defrauded sovereign powers that became the Lien Holders.

Overall, however, the position is that the refusal of Banque Paribas to honour the top Trustee’s instructions in respect of funds that we know have been taxed, represented a MAJOR BANK FRAUD under international banking and criminal law, for which the French bankers in question could have suffered literally ANY fate at the hands of INTERPOL – from summary execution, to their immediate incarceration or extradition to appropriate jurisdictions for judicial processing. The key Paris-based Trustee was also required to pay four countries which had floated certain bonds.

• 1st January 2010: It was reported to us that, focusing in part on preventing corrupt bankers and operatives diverting funds back to the Bush ‘Black Ops.’ Syndicate, INTERPOL had placed teams at both ends of certain Settlements transactions – especially given the endemic corruption within the Federal Reserve, where the Chairman, Dr Bernanke, features among the highest-level operatives within the US official structures who is vulnerable to being targeted under the POLICY CHANGE implemented at the US Department of Justice and in light of the necessary freedom of operation afforded INTERPOL following President Obama’s Executive Order dated 16th December 2009.

• The main portions of taxes on the Settlement money were reported to us to have been taken out of the gross amount on 30th- 31st December 2009, so that they are applicable for tax purposes in calendar 2009, meaning that the proceeds are available to the Government now. At 8: 24pm on New Year’s Day, we also received, in response to an earlier enquiry to a senior Settlements recipient, confirmation from both US and European sources that ‘my taxes were taken off the top on or before 31st December in order for them to be credited to Fiscal 2009. I got that word Wednesday 12/30/09’.

Note: However given that ‘Line-Item’ payments were not implemented within calendar 2009, as should have occurred (indeed, had been promised for before Christmas), taxes cannot legally be removed from such gross payments in that context, since they are not payable until 15th April 2011; and payment is therefore expected by certain parties in full. Prior deduction of taxes in the current fiscal and calendar years from such payees’ amounts would indeed represent major BANK FRAUD and would be eligible for legal action under RICO (three times damages). Put another way, taxes cannot be charged on the basis of constructive receipt: only on the basis of economic receipt.

• 1st January: The Texas firm of lawyers, Troutman Sanders – used in the past by the George Bush Syndicate – was reported to be engaged in breaking down the funds for delivery and distribution. As previously noted, when we were originally informed about this law firm’s involvement with the distributions, we couldn’t believe what we were being told. However for reasons not yet explained, we were told ‘that’s the way it’s got to be’.

We pointed out that under the new dispensations [see above], any partner within that firm who may be dumb enough to continue functioning as though no fundamental discontinuity from the ‘Black Operations’ norm had taken place, would be extremely foolish in view of the fact that the penalty for treason in time of war is summary execution. Finally, we were advised that Troutman Sanders was being closely monitored and watched.

• 1st January: About 30 arrests of bankers and organised corruption participants were reported from both Europe and the United States (no further details). It is believed that INTERPOL had made preplanned arrangements to ‘set arrestees up’ in order to have them arrested ‘in flagrante’.

Certainly INTERPOL has been monitoring ALL PHONE CALLS. Nothing at all can be discussed by any relevant party that is not monitored and recorded. Furthermore, INTERPOL personnel were working non-stop to ensure that the funds are secure and performing constant unexpected spot checks at all institutions involved in the transfers.

• 1st January: It was reported to us at 5:20pm UK time that Leon Panetta, the Director of Central Intelligence (CIA), who had been doing his best as late as 3rd January to block the Settlements, is now the target of an investigation and was quote ‘physically cornered’ unquote on this date not least because it was (correctly) suspected that he was intending to interfere with the Settlements process. We were later advised that Leon Panetta is indeed in severe trouble (as reported on 28th December 2009) and is among a number of highest-level Government figures who are candidates for being ‘taken down’. At press date, Panetta was still in place, but ‘on notice’.

• 4th January 2010: An arrest list was issued by INTERPOL for a large number of people ‘standing in the way’ of resolution to be taken into custody. When we made further enquiries, we established that Bench Warrants were issued on this date for service on 137 individuals in the United States. These people will be or are being arrested and taken into custody by US Marshals. Their passports, IDs and driving licenses, etc, will have been removed in the process.

Self-evidently, these arrests implied that those concerned had continued to be associated with OPERATION STILLPOINT sabotage activity designed to disrupt the Settlements payouts. However given that ALL WHO STAND IN THE WAY, from the highest to the lowest, will be investigated and prosecuted [see above], it could also have been the case that these people were on the arrest list anyway, and that with their return to their offices and desks, and the with reopening of the Courts following the long weekend, matters proceeded as had been planned by INTERPOL earlier.

• 4th January: Michael C. Cottrell received a death threat from telephone number 717-294 3687. The FEMALE voice said: ‘Is this roadkill?’ When they do stupid things like this, they simply advertise that we have trodden on their nerves. [Join the club, Michael].

[Following the Editor’s posting of his belated Christmas Message on 4th January, our voicemail received THREE renditions of a satanic mass, including the initiation of a young woman into the worship of Satan: see at the top of this report. The harsh American male voice wasn’t satisfied, evidently, with his first attempt, so he did it again – twice. This (and subsequent similar pathetic satanic assaults by the same means) indicates that, of course, the LAST thing these nutcases ever expected was a Biblically literate essay appearing on this website, which usually has to do with vexing worldly matters. The imprecations were full of hatred and venom against Jesus Christ. See the relevant passage from the Gospel of John appended at the top of this report. How shocked and infuriated these fools must be to be made aware that there are still those who are not ashamed to proclaim Jesus Christ, whether they like it or not, and that this is being done on a website that has become – thanks exclusively to YOUR support – widely read, as this crisis unfolds].

• 4th January: The senior Trustee in Paris was required to attend at Banque Paribas (allegedly one of the most corrupt banks in the world, reported to have held or to hold about 3,000 Bush Sr.-linked accounts) between 2:00am and 4:00am European time [8:00am and 10:00am EST], from which (given the huge accumulation of Bush accounts) the distribution must begin.

Bankers at the institution refused to release the funds, and shortly afterwards were arrested by INTERPOL personnel. The refusal of the French bankers to fulfil their obligations represented MAJOR BANK FRAUD [see above] under international banking and criminal law, given that taxes have been taken off the top (which we know from THREE sources, one of which came, as noted, from a Trustee to us IN WRITING).

Moreover this state of affairs represented an IMMENSE CRISIS for President Sarkozy if he or any of his colleagues were involved – as the President of France, like the President of the United States [see below] can be arrested, just like any other participant in the sabotage operations, for blocking the Settlements under the wide powers wielded both in the United States and of course abroad by INTERPOL under the jurisdiction of the World Court.

Before Christmas, we learned that French official sources had finally acknowledged that ‘what has to be done has to be done’ – which, being translated, meant that Paris had at long last realised and accepted that the Dollar Refunding Programme WILL be run out of London, as we have stated, and that they have to drop their typically sterile French envy of the fact that (as they see it) the British have ‘got the better of them’.

In reality, all that has happened is that the British Monarchical Power has had to assert its power and right to obtain restitution for the grotesque violations perpetrated by the American criminal financiers against the sovereign LOAN money – for which the former US Treasury Secretary, Henry M. Paulson, has been reported by us to have been physically removed to British jurisdiction in Bermuda, where he will face the consequences of his serially corrupt behaviour.

Following the arrests of the French bankers in Paris, we understand that Banque Paribas suddenly started to cooperate – the reasoning, presumably, of bank officers remaining in situ being that it would be rather stupid to repeat the mistake of their arrested colleagues. For this reason alone, we gathered after midnight UK time in the early morning of 5th January 2010 that payment may have proceeded to the United States, with a senior Trustee operating out of Dallas able to carry out his distribution responsibilities at last. [See later information].

• 4th January: At 21:37pm UK time we learned that the US news media had confirmed that the President had returned to Washington from his vacation and that he had at once summoned (the recalcitrant) Director of Central Intelligence, Mr Panetta to the Oval Office. With President Obama having returned to the White House from his fraught vacation in Hawaii, it was reported to us that the President was ‘kicking butt’ – an activity that he had no choice but to undertake, given that if he demurred, he would be considered a co-conspirator and would be arrested himself.

Specifically, we were advised on ‘special’ authority that Mr Obama was explicitly confronted and informed that if he was found to have been involved with the sabotage operations that continued up to Christmas and throughout the holiday period, he himself would be arrested like those for which Bench Warrants were issued on the same date [see above]. The President responded that he had had nothing to do with the delays that occurred over the holidays.

• 4th January: Whether that was true or not (and it ‘needed’ to be accurate because if it wasn’t, Mr Barack Obama would cease to be President of the United States), we were informed on this date that Timothy Geithner – despite his previous arrest, the removal of his passport and his driving license and the monitor attached to him, and despite severe earlier humiliations [see below] – had remained right in the thick of sabotage operations during the holidays and afterwards.

The same reportedly applied to the Comptroller of the Currency, John C. Dugan. One informant suggested to us that Mr Geithner was ‘sick in the head’, but our hypothesis was that he is the subject of multiple blackmailing operations.

We were advised that Geithner had been re-arrested and that the Comptroller of the Currency, John C. Dugan, said also to have been involved in money sabotage, was also reported to us to have been arrested, although this had not been confirmed to us by late on 6th January UK time.

• 4th January: Some of those arrested on 4th January were reported to us to have been cuffed and shipped to Europe (as happened late in 2007), to face justice in appropriate jurisdictions or under the jurisdiction of the World Court.

• 5th January: It was pointed out to us that prominent Republicans have or had been standing in the way of the Settlements. We knew that this must have been the case because of the anti-Obama barrage orchestrated by parties connected with the GOP for the past 13 months, to the exclusion of all else. This has been a major ongoing agitprop operation – the underlying purpose being hidden from view. On the surface, the objective has been to paint Obama as a crypto-Communist with mafia associations and all sorts of other dark failings and skeletons in his cupboard – as though his mass-murderer Republican predecessor (who is reported by monitoring sources to have been reduced to walking his dog at Crawford, TX, with a pooper-scooper, his wife Laura now living apart from him and only appearing for public consumption when her presence is considered ‘essential’), had no blemishes and skeletons at all. But in reality, the underlying purpose of this ongoing orchestrated anti-Obama offensive has been to try to wrench the CIA’s destructive Fraudulent Finance paradigm from oblivion in general, and to rehabilitate OPERATION STILLPOINT in particular.

It is unclear what these Republicans, who haven’t understood this crisis, think they are doing continuing with their antagonistic sabotage stance, given the advent of the NEW PARADIGM summarised above. Perhaps these corrupt operatives imagine that they really are above the law, and have – like Geithner up to 4th January – simply not woken up to the reality that the ground has shifted so violently under their feet that they are wandering in a wilderness without life support.

• 5th January: It was confirmed [and reconfirmed by several further sources] that the ‘lead Trustee’ in Paris was finally paid out at midnight Paris time 4th/5th January, as a consequence of which the 160 country payees were finally also paid out.

Given multiple high quality confirmations, this information is considered reliable. However these developments did not occur until others standing in the way had been arrested or ‘taken out’.

• 6th January: ‘Downstream’ resistance persisted, at least during the morning in the United States. Those still attempting sabotage are either so compartmentalised and spaced out that they haven’t grasped what has happened, or else they STILL thought that they could ‘get away with it’. We were emphatically assured that ‘THEY CAN NOT’.

We were also tipped off that the legal firm Troutman Sanders, which is or was required to make distributions, had been put on notice that if a single deviation from Pay Orders and instructions were to take place within their firm, THE ENTIRE FIRM WOULD BE TAKEN OVER BY INTERPOL, while agents within the structures failing to pay out payee funds lodged with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, in particular, would suffer the same fate without further warning.

‘LONG AFTER THE HORSE HAS BOLTED’ CORNER
The following instances of reality catching up with people who should have known better, and officials ‘coming late to the party’, have been greeted with a mixture of astonishment, mirth and quiet cynicism in this office. Specifically:

1: FINRA HAS JUST STARTED LOOKING INTO CDOs:
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) was reported on 30th December by The Times, London, to have ‘STARTED [sic] an investigation into synthetic Collateralised Debt Obligations [CDOs]’ and has ‘several investigations into so-called ‘authentic CDOs’ – begging the obvious question: so, there are unauthentic CDOs?

The report continued: ‘The Securities and Exchange Commission’ – the self-same regulator which is exposed above as having illegally traded PHANTOM SHARES on an illicit secret platform in the market, and is accordingly IN NO POSITION TO DO ANY REGULATING UNTIL IT HAS REGULATED ITSELF, at the very least – ‘is also thought to be looking into the complex instruments created by the banks and sold to investors, such as pension funds’.

Our first predictable comment is: on what planet have these officials been vegetating for the past decade and more? Our second predictable observation is this: OF COURSE! Given the double-mindedness norm underlying all this wall-to-wall duplicity, it was NO PROBLEM for the S.E.C. to be ‘regulating’ with its left hand (or going through the motions of doing so) while illegally trading the phantom stock and scamming the market with its right hand!

[This brings to mind the old adage: ‘Here is my right hand to begin with, and here is my left hand opposite. If I lose my right hand, my left hand is right, because the only hand left is my right’].

THEREFORE, neither is it a problem here for FINRA and the Securities and Exchange Commission suddenly to embark upon ‘investigations’ into the Fraudulent Finance gimmicks developed by the criminal financial enterprises they were quote ‘regulating’ unquote. Why not? When everyone is double-minded, what’s the problem?

• FINRA, the Financial Industry Regulatory AUTHORITY, is a menace and should be disbanded.

An ‘Authority’ IS NOT AN ENFORCEMENT AGENCY: it is just a toothless ‘watchdog’ which does little watching. It was deliberately established as a toothless entity relating to the state of affairs in the United Kingdom, where the marketing of securities is NOT PROPERLY REGULATED, as is supposed to be the case in the United States under the 1933 and 1934 Securities Acts. It ‘replaced’ NASD Inc. (the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.) which wielded drastic enforcement powers under the Malone Act [see the Legal Notes, below]. When ‘NASD became FINRA’, so that discipline was deliberately relaxed, FINRA became its own trading platform, furthering the hidden destructive intent underlying OPERATION STILLPOINT.

The SUDDEN initiation of an investigation into synthetic Collateralised Debt Obligations (CDOs) at this late stage has everything to do with a belated attempt by FINRA officials to protect themselves from the axes falling out of the sky given the CHANGE OF POLICY at the US Department of Justice, rather than with an intention to do its job properly. In any case, we have long since exposed these fraudulent transactions: all FINRA needs to do is to READ WHAT WE HAVE PUBLISHED.

Christine Selb, writing for The Times from New York, elaborated:

‘To create a synthetic CDO, banks acted as the buyers of the underlying CDSs (Credit Default Swaps). This meant that the banks were betting that insured debts would default and the CDSs would pay out, while their clients, confident at the time in the exponential rise of the housing market, were betting that they would not have to pay out’.

‘The banks have argued that taking the short side of the deal was a legitimate way of hedging against other exposure they had in the housing market’.

‘However, an article in The New York Times last week intimated that Goldman Sachs had stuffed synthetic CDOs with toxic CDSs and sold the instruments to unwitting institutional investors, while knowing that their short bets would swiftly pay out’.

‘The paper said that some synthetic CDOs created by Goldman Sachs went bad within five months of being created by the institution. On its website, Goldman Sachs published a lengthy rebuttal to the allegations published in the New York Times’.

‘The bank said that it had lost $1.7 billion on residential mortgages in 2008 and asserted that it had created the synthetic CDOs to meet demand from clients, who were told that Goldman Sachs would take a short position against them’.

‘“The buyers of synthetic mortgage CDOs were large, sophisticated investors”, the bank said. “They did not rely on the issuing banks in making their investment decisions”’.

• In other words, they believed that the name Goldman Sachs stands for integrity and probity (having of course failed to pay attention and to read on this website all about the serial criminal finance activities, thefts and diversions perpetrated by that arch-crook, Henry M. Paulson, Goldman Sachs’ former CEO); so if they boobed, that was their problem, not Goldman’s.

• We now reveal that it was a Goldman Sachs compliance officer who told the Editor that the price of a synthetic ‘structured product’ is ‘what somebody is prepared to pay for it’.

2: THE GOLDMAN SACHS ‘CONTROVERSY’:
In The New York Times’ article, former Goldman employees and debt experts claimed that the bank knew that the CDOs it was designing and selling were highly risky. The Daily Telegraph [dated 30th December 2009] was more specific:

‘The sources claimed that rather than warning clients of the dangers, Goldman spent millions of dollars “short-selling” the instruments, reaping vast rewards when they imploded’.

‘Sylvain Raynes, an expert in structured finance at R & R Consulting, told The New York Times: “The simultaneous selling of securities to customers and shorting them is the most cynical use of credit information that I have ever seen”’.

‘When you buy protection against an event that you have a hand in causing, you are buying fire insurance on someone else’s house, and then committing arson”’.

• FACT: In other words, it is being stated here that the securities in question were marketed with criminal intent. Given the CHANGE OF POLICY at the US Department of Justice, it should follow that certain Goldman Sachs executives (and at other institutions involved in this obviously nefarious scamming activity) may be having sleepless nights: except that these people are so arrogant that they NEVER imagine that they can be caught out.

• This may no longer be a reliable assumption on their part.

• FACT: We exposed the corruption and fraud embedded in ‘structured finance’ back in 2008, both on this website and in International Currency Review – subscribers to which journal include large multinational financial institutions all over the world. Yet only now – long after a thousand horses have bolted out of the stable – has this started, belatedly, to become an issue.

• Maybe these people are suffering pain at last.

This state of affairs conforms to another Story’s Law:
‘Investigative journalists are hated when they investigate but are proved right years later when the timely nature and fact of their investigations, ignored at the time, has been forgotten’.

3: SHENZHEN NANSHAN POWER VS. GOLDMAN SACHS:
A state-owned Chinese thermal power generator is refusing to pay $80 million lost on two hedging contracts in a long-running dispute with Goldman Sachs, claiming that Western investment banks developed ‘extremely complicated’ derivative ‘products’ that were manifestly quote ‘impossible to understand’ unquote (on purpose of course).

On New year’s Day, the Chinese entity revealed that J. Aron and Company, the commodities arm of Goldman Sachs, had threatened to sue it for more than $80 million compensation for termination of the contracts in October 2008 – shortly after the financial sector imploded due to the ‘lockdown’ of the $14.0+ sovereign ‘real’ money on 10th-12th September 2008. The Chinese thermal generating firm said, in a statement to its local stock exchange: ‘We will not accept the demand by J. Aron for all the losses and related interests’.

In the face of the prospect of very large losses in October 2008, the Chinese securities regulator ordered the state-owned Shenzhen to cancel its agreement with J. Aron, which the regulator said that the thermal power firm had not been authorised to enter into. The regulator, China’s Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC), is supporting Shenzhen in this dispute.

Specifically, Le Wei, SASAC’s Vice-Chairman, said that foreign investment banks had ‘maliciously’ sold derivatives contracts that were ‘intentionally complex and highly leveraged’ to Chinese state-owned corporations. The banks had ‘fraudulently peddled’ the contracts with ‘evil intentions’.

Accurate. See OPERATION STILLPOINT below, and our prior exposures of the Fraudulent Finance offensive. Interestingly, no foreign bank has yet dared to bring a legal action to pursue payments due under such Fraudulent Finance contracts. They can’t – unless they are anxious to face public humiliation and terminal reputational damage. Which means that the criminal financial enterprises know perfectly well that they have been engaged in Fraudulent Finance.

4: MORGAN STANLEY SUED OVER A CDO:
On Christmas Eve, Morgan Stanley was at the receiving end of a lawsuit filed by a Virgin Islands-based pension fund over a $1.2 billion ‘authentic CDO’ (a package of debts, such as mortgages, sorted into tranches of varying levels of risk and sold to investors seeking the income stream from the debt repayments, according to the misleading prospectus).

The pension fund, which filed its suit in Federal Court, has accused the bank of stuffing the CDO with low-quality ‘assets’ which Morgan Stanley (like Goldman Sachs: see above) was simultaneously shorting. It is quite difficult to imagine anything more duplicitous than this formula.

5: FALCONE IN LEGAL CONTROVERSY
Philip Falcone, mentioned in an earlier report in this series, who made vast sums shorting sub-prime mortgages as head of Harbinger Capital, was ordered by a Delaware Judge at the end of last year to answer accusations of fraud and civil conspiracy. The allegations relate to a takeover battle dating back to 2006. Falcone also bet heavily against HBOS in 2009.

In fact, both Falcone brothers are caught up in this.

6: HR 4173: THE WALL STREET REFORM AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT:
Rather than reiterate the work of others, we append as an Addendum at the foot of this report, the text of a Bloomberg report dated 30th December 2009 by David Reilly. Essentially, it reveals that the US House of Representatives is a corrupt sham, making a mockery of representative government and willfully adding, in spades, to America’s problems. Rather like our House of Common Idiots.

DOCUMENTED EXPOSURE OF OPERATION STILLPOINT
As stated at the top of this report, we will now expose and desconstruct OPERATION STILLPOINT – the five-phase criminal offensive against the United States and the American people which these reports have been leading up to, and which it has proved possible by using the methodology we have employed as these investigations have developed, to reveal.

• BRIEF PROLOGUE:
HOW THE EDITOR ‘RODE THE BEAST’
The Editor started work on this investigation after attending a meeting in Washington DC in June 2002 convened by a controlled entity ostensibly concerned with ‘managing’ the plight of the 9/11 bereaved. During that event, an agent handed out about 30 portfolios containing copies of Federal Reserve print-outs and other banking documents detailing corrupt financial payments of immense proportions, including illicit transfers to George H. W. Bush when he was President of the United States, which is of course illegal – together with authorisations by Dr Alan Greenspan, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, and who turns out to have served as George H. W. Bush Sr.’s master criminal finance technician.

All the portfolios handed out by the US agent were immediately placed into the hands of CIA operatives who had packed the meeting at the last moment for the precise purpose of blocking distribution of the documents – with the exception of one portfolio that was handed over to a representative from Vanity Fair (which never touched the information, thus missing the biggest story in modern world history), while another portfolio containing the ‘smoking gun’ documents were later obtained by the Editor of this service.

To cut an extremely long story (which will be recounted elsewhere) short, the Editor became aware that Leo/Lee Wanta, subject of coverage in the late Claire Sterling’s book ‘Thieves’ World’ [Simon & Schuster, New York, ISBN 0-671-74997-8, 1994], might well provide answers to questions raised as a consequence of the Editor’s fieldwork. The Editor therefore targeted Wanta and, on a certain date in May 2004, arrived at his doorstep in a remote Wisconsin location. Mr Wanta opened the door and granted the Editor an interview lasting three hours.

Thereafter, the Editor made his developing website platform available to Wanta, who has a reputation for being the most proficient deception artist in existence – on the ‘open’ principle (admittedly fraught with risks) that if ‘trust’ was placed in Wanta, it might be reciprocated (an assessment that flew in the face of the odds: but that was part of the risk).

Starting in the spring of 2006, we therefore began to highlight the curious arrangement (since established to have been a White House/US Treasury ruse) whereby $4.5 trillion of funds were repatriated from safekeeping at the People’s Bank of China (originally facilitated by the Chinese intelligence operative Howie Kwong Kok) to finance the intended Dollar Refunding Programme – not to compensate Wanta for his earlier intelligence ‘work’ in helping to ransack the Soviet Union with the assistance of Soviet insiders and other crooks, and for his periodic imprisonment under the Clinton Administration (President Clinton procured, by devious conspiratorial means involving the Governor of Wisconsin, to have Wanta arrested on largely trumped-up charges, as we later exposed, and incarcerated: whereupon Clinton stole the United Nations’ contract Number 5, which had been awarded to Wanta: see below).

To summarise the key point here, it is now deduced that the $4.5 trillion was made available by the Chinese authorities TO FINANCE THE REFUNDING – but that when it was realised that Wanta didn’t know what he was doing (and would, if left to handle the Refunding, abuse his responsibility so that the world would have experienced an even more catastrophic blow-up than actually occurred in 2007-09) – the Bush/Paulson Treasury (spearheaded by the operative Henry M. Paulson) revamped OPERATION STILLPOINT, as described below, instead of Wanta handling the Refunding (not least because of immense opportunities for private illicit, untaxed profit in the process). In other words, they realised after the funds were transferred, that Wanta would mess everything up. And how right they were – judging by the confused twists and turns in the virtual projects that he told the Editor (in a Staten Island Hotel in November 2007) that he was intending to finance.

The Editor’s calculation all along was that if he followed the Wanta trail, a degree of truth would eventually emerge. We then found ourselves caught up in his campaign to procure economic receipt of the $4.5 trillion, running a campaign of exposure via this website which Wanta more or less commandeered – sending the Editor faxed instructions, which are held in our files – while we generally provided him with a publicity platform that he otherwise lacked.

Moreover, on the same principle, the Editor rashly LENT Wanta $35,000 of his own private funds (obtained from the successful sale of a central London private house) for a period of two years at 7% arms’ length interest – at the suggestion of Wanta through Steven Goodwin, a CIA-approved Wanta Attorney based in Richmond, VA. The purpose of this loan was to provide the restitution funds, plus other fees, demanded by the Wisconsin Court as the price for the ending of Wanta’s extended probation (which was scheduled to end on 28th November 2010).

After a delay lasting for more than 4 months, while authorities debated what on earth to do given this ‘unanticipated wildcard development’ (as lending Mr Wanta money for this purpose, we later discovered, had been forbidden to Agency and other personnel; and in any case Wanta did not repay the loan on the due date (11th June 2007 or at any time since, so has stolen the loan funds – which he has also done, we have subsequently learned, with certain other monies), the Wisconsin State Department of Corrections was finally left with no alternative but to award Wanta an Absolute Discharge from his Wisconsin Court-ordered probation, effective 14th November 2005.

After the $4.5 trillion was brought over from Beijing in May 2006 and the money was not deposited for Wanta’s account(s), we started the de facto exposure campaign on behalf of Leo Wanta, which continued until it had to be abruptly terminated in March 2008.

This happened because Wanta had been consorting and deliberating behind our backs with the Bushes, Cheney, et al., contrary to the stance he had maintained in dealings with us – and because we received warnings from others that we were being used. In fact this came as no surprise to the Editor, who had understood from the outset that he might be riding the beast, and that the beast would in all probably shake him off his back. Which is what happened.

Now in the course of this operation, and for two years prior to meeting Wanta in person, the Editor obtained a large portfolio from the public domain of documents, and learned an immense amount about corrupt intelligence operations which could not have been obtained other than by the use of methodology such as is summarised above.

In other words, this represented nothing less than an unwitting de facto penetration of criminal intelligence for international investigative journalism purposes, guided by the Editor’s instinctive understanding that the investigations would eventually hit pay-dirt.

What we didn’t know was the exact nature of the beast that the Editor was riding. It will now be exposed. We were actually inadvertently, from June 2006 to March 2008, assisting the progress of OPERATION STILLPOINT, without realising it. But in conformity with the Editor’s perception that the truth would be more than likely to emerge, Wanta made a number of serious mistakes in the second half of 2007 and the first quarter of 2008, which saved the situation: and indeed, looking back, the Editor has a strong sense of having been guided throughout.

OPERATION STILLPOINT IN WANTA’S OWN WORDS
We begin with a communication from Wanta to President Barack Obama dated 25th December 2009. We will then proceed on the same basis as in the report dated 26th November 2009. That report carried the following introductory observations which have to be replicated here for clarity:

• We publish herewith detailed intelligence the implications of which will surely be clear to ‘the interested’ and to close students of the prevailing unprecedented global criminal finance crisis, and on which we will make no further comment and will answer no questions.

• This is the SECOND ‘delivery’ of such intelligence. It is based on a sworn and signed Affirmation document dated 3rd January 2010, obtained by this service at 10:02pm UK time on that date.

The documented NUMBERED FACTS given below are referenced thus : (7), (18), etc, by the Notes and References at the foot of the report above the Addendum. With the exception of the Wanta letter to the President, all the data presented hereafter are sourced from the signed Affirmation document provenanced from impeccable sources.

Insertions by the Editor in the NUMBERED FACTS sequences are shown between square brackets.

WANTA’S STILLPOINT COMMUNICATION TO OBAMA
ON THE DAY OF THE ATTEMPTED AIRCRAFT BOMBING
Leo Wanta sent a communication to The Office of the President, The Hon. Barack Obama, The White House, West Wing , from Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta, dated 25 December 2009 – the very day when a terrorist attempted to blow up the Northwest Airlines aircraft – requesting ‘Urgent Confirmation’ under ‘Security Code: ‘STILLPOINT’, carrying the following messages:

• ‘Partial proof of funds to lawfully [sic] pay my Civil Repatriation Income Taxes of US Dollar 1.565 Trillion NOW’ [referencing further pages of historical material also sent with the communication];

and:

• ‘Merry Christmas to our Great Nation’. [Reiteration of Wanta’s overdone ‘patriotic card’, identified in our exposures of the Principality of Snake Hill fraud: see the report dates immediately below]

Mr Obama was of course in Hawaii with his family at the time.

This communication, which was also disseminated via the Internet, was delivered on a letterhead of The Principality of Snake Hill – a fraudulent virtual entity that does not exist, as of course we have long since proved [see our reports dated 20th September, 22nd October, and 17th November 2009]. It seems to us that communicating with the Head of State on a fraudulent letterheading is fraud or considerably worse: after all, the Head of State is entitled to receive only the truth.

If the Head of State is lied to and deceived, to whom should he or she appeal in order to be told the truth, the Man in the Moon?

Could this communication have had ANYTHING at all to do with possible precautionary obfuscation of the allegation, already publicised by this service, that the Wanta corporation named Marvelous Investments Limited financed al-Qaeda? Such an hypothesis might ‘explain’ the hasty, reckless, self-defeating use of the discredited Principality of Snake Hill letterheading, and Mr Leo Wanta’s invocation of the defunct ‘Security code: STILLPOINT’, as well as the reality that President Obama was vacationing in Hawaii, a fact that was in the public domain and that Wanta would have known – so that, therefore, sending the communication to the President on a fraudulent letterhead at the wrong address on Christmas Day was manifestly anomalous.

At the risk of tedious repetition, we repeat herewith the statement from the Australian Embassy, Dublin, informing our Irish colleague. Richard Sharpe, of the self-evident fact of the non-existence of the Principality of Snake Hill [the use of ‘snake’, i.e., serpent, in the name and virtual image for this fabrication being, we presume, NOT ACCIDENTAL. It is extraordinary how these people openly advertise their allegiance to the Evil One, isn’t it?].

Ms. Brenda Farrell, of the Australian Embassy in Dublin, confirmed on 23rd September 2009 to one of the Editor’s private associates (Richard Sharpe) that there is no Principality in Australia:

“Austremb Dublin” <Austremb.Dublin@dfat.gov.au> wrote:

Dear Mr Sharpe,

Thank you for your email.

There is no principality in Australia.

Kind regards

Australian Embassy
Dublin
Tel: +353 (0) 1 664 5300
Fax: +353 (0) 1 678 5185

Secondly, OPERATION STILLPOINT is being dismantled, and is dead, as explained in this report.

However, Leo Wanta chooses not to recognise either of these realities. This represents a clear example of the blindness induced by arrogance: about which more could be said, but won’t be, because we must proceed with the exposure of OPERATION STILLPOINT – the five-phase criminal project to take down the United States and seize the assets of the nation and its people.

GORBACHEV: WORLD REVOLUTION EMINENCE GRISE IN THE WOODWORK
Recall former Soviet President Gorbachëv’s involvement with the Bush Crime Syndicate inter alia via his participation in Deutsche AG (the former Barrington Investment Group). Finally, bear in mind that it has transpired that Wanta has been ‘working for’ George H. W. Bush Sr. all along, facilitating his financial activities – even while still languishing on probation and confined within the State of Wisconsin up until the Editor’s private (stolen) LOAN funds procured his release from such Court confinement effective 14th November 2005, and subsequently

And before we begin the exposure, recall also the following:

(a) ALL involved in this financial corruption are to be investigated and prosecuted,
there being no exceptions; and:

(b) The enhanced powers of INTERPOL and the de facto suspension of Habeas Corpus
in the context of THIS CRISIS and for no other reason.

EVIDENCE ON OPERATION STILLPOINT PROVIDED BY WANTA ON 28TH SEPTEMBER 2006
The exposure begins with information provided by Leo/Lee Wanta in September 2006 [passages and words in square brackets that have been inserted here by the Editor for clarification do not appear in the underlying signed and sworn Affirmation document]:

• (1); On 28th September, between approximately 12:05pm EDT and 12:13 EDT, Affirmation source placed a phone call to Leo/Lee E. Wanta, [then] Chairman and sole owner of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., in the course of which Wanta advised source of the following:

• (2): That the US Treasury system is going to be reorganized, by changing ‘debt to legal tender’, and that this ‘debt’ will be paid off using ‘securitized debt as legal tender’.

• (3): That the US Dollar used internationally will cease to be issued by the Federal Reserve, but will instead be issued by the US Treasury under Henry M. Paulson Jr. [the former CEO of Goldman Sachs, who was summoned by George Bush Jr. from Wall Street to replace John Snow as Treasury Secretary shortly after the $4.5 trillion was received from the People’s Bank of China].

• (4): That the US Treasury will monetize all Federal Reserve and Federal Government debt and will eliminate Personal Income Tax.

• (5): That interest earned on the bonds (debt) will remain with the US Treasury at 6% per annum, and will not be earned via the commercial banks and the Federal Reserve [see below].

• (6): That the US Congress will issue US Dollar [bills], and that [the monetary aggregate] M-3 will not reflect any Federal Reserve Notes.

• (7): That there will be no [official or other] borrowing from banks,
since all lending will be initiated from within the US Treasury.

• (8): That the US Treasury will reclaim power to create the US Dollar
and ELIMINATE THE BANKING SYSTEM.

• (9): That “refunding” of the US Dollar/US banks and the Federal Reserve Banks will no longer be necessary. [On the contrary] the US Treasury becomes the only Central Bank for the United States of America, with Hank Paulson the ONLY Central Banker for the United States of America.

• (10): That all debt will reside in US Treasury Direct Accounts
and US Treasury Depository Accounts.

• (11): That [accordingly] the US Dollar will be weak [on the foreign exchange markets] and on a short-term basis [so that] Chinese products will increase in price.

• (12): That “everybody” (meaning inter alia, the French and the Iraqi authorities) agrees that there will be no “terrorists”, and that the ‘old Federal Reserve Notes’ will become the new US Dollar with NO TREASURY BONDS: ONLY TREASURY DIRECT ACCOUNTS.

• (13): And that: This programme is codenamed: OPERATION STILLPOINT.

[End of the first batch of special intelligence].

• NOTE: This is/was the underlying long-range subversion programme. The NESARA fictions are/were CIA disinformation ploys to deflect any attention from OPERATION STILLPOINT and to ensure that if it leaked, it would be swamped by NESARA-type confusion, stirred up to fever pitch if ‘necessary’ by websites specialising in the maximising of the fog of confusion.

• Wanta ‘worked/works with’ the Bush-CIA-DVD control and criminal finance syndicate, which is how he, as a key latent player in this massive takedown operation – which was to follow the takedown of the Soviet Union – obtained this information.

As noted, his Christmas 2009 communication to President Obama, a copy of which we hold, and which is written in Wanta’s own handwriting, is labelled: ‘Security Code: STILLPOINT’.

Other signed/unsigned Wanta documents obtained from and in the public domain, and from Wanta himself, and held in our own archive, are likewise labelled OPERATION STILLPOINT, stretching back many years – which PROVES that OPERATION STILLPOINT has been ‘live’ under the control of Bush Sr. since the Reagan era (1983-84), although it was ‘activated’ in earnest in 1991.

• We can now go further: it is almost certain that the intended ‘takedown’ of the United States and the ‘takedown’ of the Soviet Union represented two (dialectical) components of one gigantic DVD-linked operation, quite possibly a revolutionary Metabridge (CIA-DVD-Mossad and MI-6) offensive to ‘remodel the whole world’ to conform with a ‘New (Non-Cold War) Paradigm’ dreamed up by the cack-handed but irredeemably arrogant financial manipulators served by these agencies.

OPERATION STILLPOINT CONTINUED RIGHT UP TO THE $47 TRILLION LIEN
We will now proceed to demonstrate that OPERATION STILLPOINT was still ‘live’ as late as 6th December 2009, when the Chinese parties and the British Monarchical Power (namely, the Lien Holders) executed their Lien for $47 trillion on the US Treasury, which finally killed OPERATION STILLPOINT – which the Geithner Treasury, in some turmoil, had been making every effort to resuscitate – stone cold dead.

• But the earlier continued ‘non-dead’ status of OPERATION STILLPOINT IS THE EXPLANATION for why the Settlements have been blocked and sabotaged for years.

And as current and recent data [see above] demonstrate, it is clear now that compartmentalised cadres in the key countries (France, Britain, even Germany, even China to some extent, and the United States), and the equally de facto compartmentalised bankers and intermediaries, have not been kept up to speed by their cowed handlers with the fact that the ground had shifted violently beneath their feet – so that they have continued behaving as though OPERATION STILLPOINT was still ‘live’ (even though few of them would have had knowledge of it or of the overall picture).

This, then, explains the continued resistance and sabotage AFTER THE EXECUTION OF THE LIEN, why INTERPOL had to be given its de facto diplomatic immunity in the United States, why the US Department of Justice was compelled at long last to CHANGE ITS POLICY (i.e., to start doing its job), why Bench Warrants had to be served, for instance, on 137 individuals on 4th January 2010 – and all the other atrocious developments that we have had to try to report as this massive crisis has juddered towards resolution or catastrophe.

NAMES OF ELECTED AND APPOINTED U.S. OFFICIALS IMPLICATED
IN OPERATION STILLPOINT ACCORDING TO THIS DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE
The following sequence contains information obtained in November 2009. When considered in the context of what we now know about OPERATION STILLPOINT and that the execution of the Lien by the injured sovereign plaintiffs on or about the 6th December 2009 threw the continued de facto hegemony of the Bush-directed sabotage operations designed to sustain OPERATION STILLPOINT into disarray, we can see how very close we came to the implementation by default of OPERATION STILLPOINT – which, having been torpedoed on 10th-12th September 2008, the Paulson Treasury sought, on behalf of the Intelligence Power under Bush Sr.’s hegemony, to restart under President Obama, with Hillary Clinton in the driving seat at the State Department (given that the Bushes and Clintons ‘work together’ on behalf of the Fifth Column element of the Intelligence Power).

Moreover this documented evidence DIRECTLY IMPLICATES, in addition to Wanta, the following operatives frequently mentioned in these reports, who must now be concerned, if they have not been arrested, that they will face the consequences of their sabotage behaviour under the NEW POLICY at the Department of Justice – and given the supremacy, with its diplomatic immunity, of INTERPOL: former President Bush Sr., Henry M. Paulson Jr. (held in Bermuda, according to our own published information), former President Clinton, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the US Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner, Leon Panetta (CIA DCI), the former Fed Chairman Dr Alan Greenspan, Rahm Emanuel (Obama’s Chief of Staff, who hopes to ‘escape’ as prospective Mayor of Chicago), and the DVD’s leading banker, Dr Joseph Ackermann.

BACK-UP OFFICIALLY-SOURCED EVIDENCE DATED NOVEMBER 2009
Specifically:

• (14): On 2nd November 2009, between approximately 6:05pm EST and 6:18 pm EST, Affirmation source placed a telephone call to a special contact, who advised source of the following:

• (15): That [as previously reported by this service] former President G. W. Bush ordered Henry M. Paulson, the former US Treasury Secretary, to contact BOTH former President Bill Clinton and the current Secretary of State, Mrs Hillary Clinton, [instructing them] to get in touch with the current Secretary of the Treasury, Timothy Geithner [this job was allocated to former President Clinton] and the Director of Central Intelligence [CIA], Leon Panetta [this was to be Mrs Clinton’s task] to order them to STOP RELEASE of the ‘Settlement funds’.

[The purpose of this manoeuvre, which of course replicated innumerable earlier sabotage operations – but the main difference here is that we have DOCUMENTED INFORMATION TO REPORT – was to prevent the collapse of OPERATION STILLPOINT].

• (16): That President Obama [is sick of this nonsense which is bedevilling his Presidency and] definitely wants the Settlements ‘done now’.

• (17): That [as the matter is expressed in the Affirmation document] ‘the Chinese officially have “had it with 41” [George Bush Sr.] now’.

• (18): On 3rd November 2009, between approximately 7:14pm EST and 7:16pm EST, Affirmation source placed a telephone call to a special contact, who advised as follows:

• (19): Secretary of the Treasury Geithner was visited by enforcement people at 11:30am EST, and at 1:03pm he ‘O.K’d’ the release.

[As you will have seen, we now know that Geithner, despite the severe pressures and humiliations that have been visited upon him] was STILL interfering as late as 4th January 2010].

• (20): That the Chinese wanted their ‘obligations fulfilled’ [sic].

• INSERTED NOTE: cf. a belated French official ‘acceptance’ that ‘what has to be done has to be done’, in the context of the British Monarchical Power obtaining restitution and the US Dollar Refunding proceeding from London – something the French are believed to have resisted but which they cannot prevent: so they appear to have finally had to adopt a sensible, pragmatic attitude here, realising that the German ‘case’, being tied hand and foot to the Bush criminal CIA Syndicate ‘Black Ops’ dimension, is severely degraded by association with the Bush OPERATION STILLPOINT (to take down the United States component of the ‘Main Enemy’) – which the French were assisting through their links to Germany under the 1963 Treaty of the Elysée, of indefinite duration, which provides that both countries must reach an analogous position in respect of all matters relating to external affairs.

In other words, the French appear suddenly or belatedly to have realised, following the execution of the Lien, that they were in danger of ‘going down with Bush and Germany’. If they continued their obstructive behaviour, that is what would happen.

• (21): On 4th November 2009, between approximately 2:45pm EST and 2:47pm EST, Affirmation source placed a phone call to a special source, who advised as follows:

• (22): That two critical arrests were about to be made.

• (23): That another confrontation with Treasury Secretary Geithner is necessary.

• (24): That Secretary of State Mrs Clinton has instructed the State Department personnel NOT to transfer any money/funds to ANYONE. [However, as you may well recall from our report dated 28th December 2009, four of Mrs Clinton’s senior State Department personal aides were arrested on 17th December accused of wire fraud, a felony which, on conviction, entitles the recipient to 20 years in jail. These operatives had been surreptitiously moving money, on the instructions of Mrs Clinton, who, as Secretary of State, is in charge of ‘international economic development’.

The arrest of these four operatives resulted in the immediate collapse of the Copenhagen false-flag ‘Climate Change’ summit, because the funds were to have been illegally transferred to kick-start remittances to country participants under cover of the ‘Climate Change’ gobbledygook, to finance hidden leveraged financial trading operations under the domestic and international radar, invigorating the fake, criminalised ‘Climate Change’ compartment of Fraudulent Finance.

So, when Mrs Clinton intervened to block transfers as revealed to source on 4th November, she was being selective. She intended, on behalf of the Syndicate etc, to have the funds diverted for the foregoing purpose.

• (25): On 5th November 2009, between approximately 6:50pm EST and 6:51pm EST, Affirmation source received a telephone call from a special contact, who advised as follows:

• (26): That both Leon Panetta, the CIA’s Director of Central Intelligence, and Treasury Secretary Geithner, had again been confronted after they delayed and/pr stopped release of the Settlements.

• (27): That Treasury Secretary Geithner was now ‘so shaken’ that he was on ‘suicide watch’, supervised by members of enforcement teams.

• (28): That Former Treasury Secretary Paulson, the former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Greenspan and President Obama’s [White House] Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, had been ordered to STAND DOWN – that is to say, to cause no further delays or interference.

• (29): That despite all of the above, the CEO of Deutsche Bank, Dr Joseph Ackermann [the DVD’s chief banker] and George H. W. Bush, have both stated that the Settlement funds will be kept by them UNTIL JANUARY 2010. WHICH IS PRECISELY WHAT HAPPENED.

• Therefore, OPERATION STILLPOINT was STILL functioning into December 2009. It is thought that the reason that the funds only started being released on 5th January (despite Bench Warrants, arrests, horizontalisations, confrontations and other forms of necessary pressure) MAY (but we don’t know whether this is true or not), reflect the possibility that Settlements funds were placed out of reach in some manner. ANOTHER possibility, which might begin to explain the mystery of why the Bushes and Clintons and their associates haven’t been jailed in front of the TV cameras, is that ALL these parties routinely play dialectical double games, to confuse onlookers.

But this is just speculation on our part at this point.

[End of the special documented information].

OVERALL ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION
From the above, which is based on sworn and affirmed documentation from impeccable sources of course, it can be seen that while OPERATION STILLPOINT has again been frustrated – this time as a consequence of the Lien on the US Treasury in the sum of $47 trillion, the de facto suspension of Habeas Corpus in the context of INTERPOL’s new US diplomatic status, and the drastic associated CHANGE OF POLICY at the US Department of Justice – the saboteurs successfully delayed, as was revealed to sources in November, release of the funds until January 2010.

Moreover notwithstanding that all funds held by the Bushsnakes, and all access to codes, have been/were removed from their control, and notwithstanding the waves of arrests, which assumed dramatic proportions early in this New Year, these Fifth Column criminals nevertheless succeeded in holding the Obama Government, the United States, the American people, and the whole world to ransom up to the time of posting.

And here we need to report a further dimension. This is such a HUGE SUBVERSION OPERATION, which has been ongoing for so long (since early Reagan) that it has been suppressed on several past occasions, only to resurface again later in a different format. The first wave of the offensive occurred in the first Reagan term, with the previous Dollar Refunding operation [not discussed here], in 1984. Other OPERATION STILLPOINT initiatives, based on exploiting the consequences of the orchestrated Savings and Loan scams handled with the underworld (which was the second wave), were closed down in 1989.

In 1992, money raised from international banks, as revealed from the original ‘FINs’ documents obtained by the Editor of this service following that conference in Washington, DC, in June 2002, was then diverted to Bush Sr. and many of his outlets, under Dr A. Greenspan’s say-so (and we published all this data in International Currency Review, with comprehensive facsimiles of the documents in question).

Those proceeds – on which interest of 7.5% per annum has been chargeable for a 20-year period (therefore ending in 2012), when the 200+ banks from which the funds were raised will require their principal back – was stolen and used for yet more leveraging, hypothecation and illicit, off-balance sheet, untaxed Ponzi operations, the proceeds of which were stashed offshore.

After President Clinton had procured the arrest in Switzerland of Wanta, and his incarceration, he stole Mr Wanta’s United Nations contract Number Five, mandating the issuance of unsubordinated senior Medium-Term Notes, the proceeds of which were likewise used to further the objectives of OPERATION STILLPOINT and for bribery, corruption and self-enrichment purposes.

Meanwhile myriad Ponzi schemes were systematically proliferated involving the ransacking of investors – the most gigantic, revealed for the first time in this report, being the illicit floating of 2.25 trillion of PHANTOM CMKM/CMKX STOCK, for which the fleeced investors now require the corrupt Securities and Exchange Commission to cough up $3.87++ trillion. This of course makes the Madoff and Stanford operations look like petty crimes by comparison. We are advised directly by the lawyers concerned that the filing of this class action lawsuit against the S.E.C. is held pending satisfaction of the Settlements in general, and immediate payment out of Court of the $3.87++ trillion due to the fleeced and scammed CMKX/CMKX private investors in particular.

Each time that one of the tentacles of the Octopus (= OPERATION STILLPOINT) has been wrenched from the putrid creature, it either sprouts another tentacle, or else maximises the potential for a different tentacle to achieve the outcomes that have been aborted or frustrated elsewhere. For instance, in order to achieve the total corruption of the Federal Reserve System, given the ‘need’ to develop ‘other products’ such as the synthetic ‘structured’ products and sub-prime operations developed in the 1990s, the US Federal Reserve ‘needed’ to become both the regulator and the purchaser – on the same ‘sib’ model, essentially, as the illicit trading operations of the Securities and Exchange Commission revealed in this report.

But when this nexus of criminal finance operations was finally faced up to, and challenged by the exasperated international community, spearheaded by the 160 countries (which were finally paid out on 5th January 2010) and by the primary aggrieved sovereign owners of the loan funds stolen and diverted by the OPERATION STILLPOINT criminals holding high office, past and present, the entire edifice of corruption started to collapse – bringing the Bush Crime Family down, sending the CIA, the State Department and other US Government structures into internal strife and turmoil, and sharply truncating the survival prospects of the Bush Crime Family’s Clinton-CIA associates.

DELUSIONS OF AUTHORITY WHICH DOES NOT EXIST
As Wanta’s communication sent to President Obama on Christmas Day makes clear, he still thinks he has authority under STILLPOINT. In fact he asserts this categorically in communications, also supposedly provenanced from the fraudulent Principality of Snake Hill, to others (for instance, in a communication to a third party on 6th January 2010). In reality he’s gone through the Looking Glass and is walking upside down on the ceiling, imagining things. Like Cheney, he may be going nuts – which is what eventually happens to people whose lives revolve around deceiving others.

• He is probably in a bound situation which precludes him from switching his ‘legend’.

Certainly it would have been a catastrophic error to have entrusted him with ANY new financial responsibility: after all, he can’t even be bothered to explain politely, by letter, to a stranger who bailed him out of his probation at a cost of $35,000, why he has taken no steps to repay what he should have paid back on 11th June 2007, with interest. So, if he can’t be trusted with a mere $35,000, how could he possibly have been trusted with vastly larger sums of money?

• This point, we have had confirmed to us, was taken decisively on board some time ago.

In any case, all who ‘worked for’ the Bush Crime Syndicate are out in the freezing cold. For ever.

OPERATION STILLPOINT is dead and buried – thank the Lord Almighty.

The United States has AGAIN been saved from the ravages of the foreign-inspired Fifth Column that has burrowed deep into the fabric of its arrogant and criminalised Intelligence Power – now bitterly split between the rival collapsing Bush-DVD cadres and operatives who are believed to be slightly (but only slightly) less brain-dead – in the sense that at least they agree that the United States should not be destroyed by a malicious foreign penetration of enemy serpents from within. Of course they should have stamped on the serpents long ago: but that’s a separate issue.

The pressing reality, looking ahead, is that all who have been associated with this sabotage and betrayal of the United States and the American people are now officially ECONOMIC TERRORISTS.

So, finally, whatever messy developments may ensue, there is indeed now a glimmer of hope that the corrupted Intelligence Power can be PURGED OF THE SNAKES IN ITS MIDST – not least given that as the corrupt fiat money spigot is progressively or immediately, as a consequence of these developments, denied to the greedy US Intelligence Power, the purge will have to continue.

THE U.S. INTELLIGENCE POWER: A MENACE TO THE WHOLE WORLD
The fundamental problem, as we have previously reiterated, is that this crisis is also bound up with the perverse intent of the arrogant Intelligence Power to hold onto its hegemony over the entire US Government, developed because of its access to endless supplies of ‘Black’ fiat money, and thanks to its ‘power of penetration’. The behaviour of Leon Panetta right up to this end-game and beyond, confirms this assessment without a shadow of doubt.

What these exposures and parallel developments may thus have achieved is the decisive blow that the CIA and its subsidiaries will suffer as their free-wheeling access to limitless illicit funds through Fraudulent Finance is discontinued. That would be the most far-reaching outcome of all.

Notes and References:
The purposes of these references is simply to indicate that each and every NUMBERED FACT is documented by a signed, sworn and affirmed statement of facts provided by our sources, which is dated 3rd January 2010, and was received by this service at 10:02pm on that date.

As with the ‘first delivery’ of such intelligence, the Editor is not in a position or ready to expand or to provide any elaboration concerning these DOCUMENTED FACTS beyond what is presented here. There are sensible reasons for this: and we are fortunate that confidence in this service enables such data to be publicised on this platform. The numbers in the Notes and References correspond to the numbers preceding the FACTS themselves:

(1): Point 1 in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 2.

(2): Point 1 (a) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 2.

(3): Point 1 (b) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 2.

(4): Point 1 (c) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 2.

(5): Point 1 (d) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 2.

(6): Point 1 (e) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 2.

(7): Point 1 (f) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 2.

(8): Point 1 (g) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 2.

(9): Point 1 (h) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 2.

(10): Point 1 (i) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 2.

(11): Point 1 (j) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 2.

(12): Point 1 (k) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 2.

(13): Point 1 (l) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 2.

(14): Point 2 in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 3.

(15): Point 2 (a) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 3.

(16): Point 2 (b) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 3.

(17): Point 2 ( ) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 3.

(18): Point 3 in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 3.

(19): Point 3 (a) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 3.

(20): Point 3 (b) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 3.

(21): Point 4 in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 3.

(22): Point 4 (a) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 3.

(23): Point 4 (b) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 3.

(24): Point 4 (c) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 3.

(25): Point 5 in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 3.

(26): Point 5 (a) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 3.

(27): Point 5 (b) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 3.

(28): Point 5 (c ) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 4.

(29): Point 5 (d) in the document dated 3rd January 2010, page 4.

ADDENDUM:
HR 4173: THE WALL STREET REFORM AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT

By David Reilly, Bloomberg: 30th December 2009:
To close out 2009, I decided to do something that I bet no member of Congress has done – actually read from cover to cover one of the pieces of sweeping legislation bouncing around Capitol Hill.

Hunkering down by the fire, I snuggled up with H.R. 4173, the financial-reform legislation passed earlier this month by the House of Representatives. The Senate has yet to pass its own reform plan. The baby of Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank, the House bill is meant to address everything from Too-Big-To-Fail banks to asleep-at-the-switch credit-ratings companies to the protection of consumers from greedy lenders.

I quickly discovered why members of Congress rarely read legislation like this. At 1,279 pages, the ‘Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act’ is a real slog. And yes, I ploughed through all those pages. (Memorandum to Chairman Frank: “ystem” at line 14, page 258 is missing the first “s”).

The reading was especially painful since this reform sausage is stuffed with more gristle than meat. At least, that is, if you are a taxpayer hoping the bailout train is coming to a halt.

If you’re a banker, the bill is tastier. While banks opposed the legislation, they should cheer for its passage by the full Congress in the New Year. There are huge giveaways insuring that the Government will again rescue banks and Wall Street if the need arises.

NUGGETS GLEANED
Here are some of the nuggets I gleaned from days spent reading Frank’s handiwork:

• For all its enormous size, the bill doesn’t once mention the words Too Big To Fail, the main issue confronting the financial system. Admitting you have a problem, as any schoolchild knows, is the crucial first step toward recovery.

• On the contrary, the bill supports the biggest banks. It authorises Federal Reserve Banks to provide as much as $4 trillion in emergency funding the next time Wall Street crashes [thereby indicating that the Legislature confidently expects this to happen: – Ed.]. So much for all that talk of ‘no more bailouts’. That is more than twice what the Fed pumped into markets this time around. The size of the fund makes the bribes in the Senate’s health-care bill look minuscule.

• Oh, hold on, the Federal Reserve and the US Treasury Secretary can’t authorize these funds unless ‘there is at least a 99 percent likelihood that all the funds and interest will be paid back’. [presupposing that such a calculation in advance is possible – Ed.]

• Too bad that the same models that were used to foresee the housing meltdown will probably be used to predict this likelihood as well.

MORE BAILOUTS IN PROSPECT
• The bill also allows the Government, in a crisis, to back financial firms’ debts. Bondholders can therefore sleep easy: there are more bailouts to come.

• The legislation does create a Council of Regulators to spot risks to the financial system and the big financial firms. Unfortunately, this group is to be made up of folks who missed the problems that led to the current crisis.

• Don’t worry, though: this time regulators will have ‘better tools’. Six months after being created, the Council will report to Congress on ‘WHETHER setting up an electronic database’ would be a help. Maybe they’ll even get round to using that Internet thingy.

• This group, among its many powers, can restrict the ability of a financial firm to trade for its own account. Perhaps this section should be entitled, ‘Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., we’re looking at you’.

MANAGING BONUSES
• The bill also allows regulators to ‘prohibit any incentive-based payment arrangement’. In other words, bankers’ bonuses are still in play. Maybe Bank of America Corporation and Citigroup, Inc. shouldn’t have rushed to pay back Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) funds.

• The bill kills off the Office of Thrift Supervision, a toothless watchdog. Well, kill may be too strong a word. Because that agency and its employees will be folded into the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency [whose chief has allegedly been engaged in sabotaging the Settlements: see above – Ed]. Further proof that government never really disappears.

• Since Congress isn’t cutting jobs, why not add a few more? Accordingly, the bill calls for more than a dozen agencies to create a new position called ‘Director of Minority and Women Inclusion’. People in these new posts will be presidential appointees.

I thought Too Big To Fail banks were the pressing issue. Turns out it’s diversity, and patronage.

• Not that the House is entirely sure of what the issues really are – at least, judging by the two dozen or so studies that the bill authorizes. About a quarter of these studies relate to credit-rating companies, an area in which the legislation falls short of meaningful change. Sadly, these studies don’t tackle tough questions like whether we should just do away with ratings altogether. Here’s a tip: Do the studies, then write the legislation.

CONSUMER PROTECTION
• The bill isn’t all bad, though. It creates a brand new Consumer Financial Protection Agency, the brainchild Elizabeth Warren, who is currently head of a panel overseeing the TARP. And the first director gets the cool job of designing a SEAL for the new agency. My suggestion: Warren riding a fiery chariot while hurling lightning bolts at Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke.

• Best of all, the bill contains a provision that, in the event of another Government request for emergency aid to prop up [its pals in] the financial system, debate in Congress be limited to just 10 hours. Anything that can get Congress to shut up can’t be all bad.

Even better would be if legislators actually tackle the real issues stemming from the financial crisis, end bailouts and, for the sake of my eyes, write far, far shorter bills.

• Comment by the Editor:
I like his dry, witty cynicism. Verdict: Excellent analysis. But nothing like rude enough.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

• It is suitable for PC’s but not Mac computers. As with all such programs, the License is renewable at a modest fee annually. This is done on-line in the usual way [with the supplier direct].

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

THE HEADING FOR THIS REPORT IS CENSORED BY THE NSA

THE LIES HAVE DECAYED AND THE PERPETRATORS ARE IN A PANIC

Friday 17 July 2009 07:00

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

CALLING EVIL GOOD, AND GOOD EVIL
‘Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!’

‘Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!’
Isaiah, Chapter 5, verses 20-21.

‘NONE OF THIS MUST EVER COME OUT’
‘None of this must ever come out, you understand’.
Well, it has.
Gwendolyn Waymark, a Bush Sr. operative, in a voicemail to the Editor in May 2003

• NOTICE TO AMERICANS FACING FORECLOSURE ON THEIR PROPERTIES:
READ THIS AFTER YOU HAVE READ OUR REPORT [ARCHIVE] DATED 26TH DECEMBER 2007.
This development proves the accuracy of the advice given in that report, namely: THE ORIGINAL MORTGAGE DOCUMENTS MUST BE PROVIDED, OR FORECLOSURE CAN BE NIXED BY THE COURTS, AND THERE IS NOTHING THE BANK CAN DO ABOUT IT:

http://foreclosuredefensenationwide.com/?p=144
NEW JERSEY COURT DISMISSES FORECLOSURE FILED BY DEUTSCHE BANK FOR FAILURE
TO PROVIDE DISCOVERY AS TO OWNER AND HOLDER OF NOTE, SECURITIZED TRUST
DOCUMENTS, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS DEMANDED BY BORROWERS

• SUNDAY, 19TH JULY UPDATE: IMPORTANT:
First, about the ‘real bullets will fly’ deadline, which is today, 19th July. This information came from CMKX ‘victims’. However AFTER the information was posted, the Editor was informed by two other sources that this deadline emanates from a very senior level of a certain structure which we can’t go into. It is very serious. There have been discussions for the past 24 hours in the undergrowth as to where this will start: ‘At the top, surely’. NO! Apparently it is to be comprehensive.

Now bear in mind that this kind of thing has been said before. But the situation is beyond critical. In the Second World War, the British finally woke up to the fact that there was a problem after the roof had fallen in and the walls were collapsing on the occupants of the dwelling.

But these criminal forces are different. The roof has caved in because the house is on fire and all the windows have been blown out: AND THEY ARE CARRYING ON SCAMMING REGARDLESS.

According to our information, THE STATES HAVE NOT BEEN PAID BECAUSE THE STIMULUS MONEY HAS NOT BEEN PAID BECAUSE THE SETTLEMENTS HAVE BEEN BLOCKED BY THESE MANIACS, who are intent upon protecting their own positions and, as has been the case all along, couldn’t care less about ordinary American employees and their families.

Employees of certain States, get this, are going to work on the basis of an undertaking that they will be paid. WHAT DOES THIS REMIND YOU OF? Answer: The constant ying-yang ‘promises’ and broken promises and raised and lowered expectations which the 320,000 (390,000) ransacked, scammed and pillaged Ponzi ‘Program’ victims have suffered over the years.

• Only NOW, they are doing it to simple, straightforward, American workers and State employees. They expect these people, who have mortgages to pay, to go to work on a promise?

What is this, a deliberate attempt to trigger blood in the streets?

Our answer to that is: NO! These people are terrified of the likes of US: everyone who is standing up (including especially YOU, reader) against these criminals. It is TRUE that they are more scared of the likes of US than ‘we’ are of them. They are cornered. They have no idea what to do.

ROGUES’ GALLERY WARNING FLUSHES OUT A DECEIVING TRUSTEE
Here’s another interesting development. As you may have noticed, we have published a ROGUES’ GALLERY warning, the point being that we will expose every single deceiving, conniving piece of work who has deceived us since we started reporting on these matters.

About three years ago, a Trustee started sending the Editor almost daily emails, giving ‘informed’ information about pending settlement arrangements. A ‘High Functionary’ had told him this, his associate in Europe was promising that, he was all set to go into the bank, he’d heard nothing all day, last week was a washout, but he understood that payment will be made this week, and so on and so forth. All this claptrap was rounded off with ‘God Bless’, because their profile of the Editor is someone who reads Scripture, and they think that Christians are thoroughly wet and easily conned.

Well, guess what? Since we posted the ROGUES’ GALLERY WARNING, this false (and of course ANONYMOUS) correspondent has VANISHED INTO THIN AIR. Doesn’t want to be exposed, you see. Trouble, is, we know who he is, where he is, who he works for, and that he and other snakes have been creaming funds off the top of trades for the uber-gangsters ALL THE WAY THROUGH.

It’s all blowing ‘as we speak’. This will become clear for all to see. It’s taken a long time, but the only way forward is for the entire edifice of corruption to be torn down. And that’s what will happen.

One other point: May we remind you that this is an INTERNATIONAL CRISIS, not simply an American crisis. Therefore, this is not a matter of national security: it’s a matter of global public interest, and these investigations are the legitimate focus of attention for an international financial journal. Our job is to provide our subscribers with ‘value-added’ financial intelligence. That’s what we try to do.

• PLEASE ALSO READ THIS IMPORTANT NOTICE BEFORE YOU GO ANY FURTHER:

The main heading of this report was intended to be:
9/11 MASS MURDER BY THREE CRIMINAL U.S. PRESIDENTS

• But it is blocked by the intrusive NSA censors. The entire report could not be posted with this heading. But when we amended the heading to read: THE HEADING FOR THIS REPORT IS CENSORED BY THE NSA… as above… we were able to post it.

• THIS, everyone, provides the whole world with a potent indication that ‘9/11 MASS MURDER BY THREE CRIMINAL U.S. PRESIDENTS’ is the APPROPRIATE heading for this report, and that the statement it contains is TRUE [as is revealed in the text below].

• PAYEE LIST REDEFINED TO INCLUDE NEUTRAL LINE ITEM PAYMENT: SEE BELOW

• THE VREELAND INFORMATION IN THIS REPORT IS UPDATED: HE’LL BE RELEASED IN 2124.

• ‘REAL BULLETS START FLYING AFTER 19TH JULY’: CMKX:
The Editor was advised at 2.15pm UK time on 18th July that CMKX people have a deadline of 19th July (Sunday) for ‘satisfaction’, after which quote ‘real bullets will start flying’ unquote. The bullets in question will, we presume, not be fired by enforcement team operatives on the ground who are still, as far as we are aware, engaged in enforcing the World Court-issued Writ of Execution, but by other parties with an interest in the ‘rectification of past wrongs’. Certainly, one has the impression, too, that the giga-criminal operatives know that the game is up, and may be engaged in ransacking the accounts (or trying to), including reverting to their stealing from the Social Security Trust Fund accounts, which they were doing at least two years ago.

A FOREIGN RANSACKING OPERATION AGAINST THE UNITED STATES?
One of their problems is that they have to ‘replace’ what they have stolen from the Government’s accounts, and they can’t, because they are being forced by the pressure of the exposures to pay out the Settlements, according to our ‘special’ information.

Obviously, the Bush-DVD Criminal Syndicate hasn’t just raped US investors alone: it has certainly ransacked the Federal Government’s accounts, as well. Such pillaging would be consistent with a foreign-controlled revenge operation, and the primary suspects would be Germany and the covert Soviet Union. And that might well help to explain why the STASI/DVD operative, Chancellor Angela Merkel, is currently painting herself ‘whiter than white’, demanding that Wall Street and the City of London are put in their place, while also conveniently papering over the uncomfortable reality, for public consumption purposes, that Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank are George H. W. Bush Sr.’s Fraudulent Finance hidey-holes, too (and that she, this ‘financial reformer’ is or has long been the recipient of Bush Sr.’s bribes, as previously reported).

• INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW: Volume 34, Numbers 3 & 4: Comprehensive coverage of the twists and turns of this crisis between September 2008 and June 2009, containing details of many of the astonishing goings-on in the lawless space called the intergovernmental sector.

• In this ‘Black’ arena, ‘anything goes’, assets of other parties are stolen and traded, deception is standard practice, and everyone lies to everyone else. This huge issue, currently ‘on machine’,
provides a devastating record and critique of the deplorable behaviour of the Big Powers, as they fight over stolen money. Please apply via the CONTACT US facility for availability and price details.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice are comprehensively debunked in the Editor’s study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor’s study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing global financial corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Just press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.

• The Editor’s $35,000 Wanta bail-out money has been stolen.

• See the second white panel for details of our latest distributed intelligence publications.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

• COPYRIGHT NOTICE: The Editor and his companies have taken measures to obtain protection and recompense for the gross breaches of copyright material, books and works owned by this service, our companies, the Editor and Author, and the Authors whose interests we must protect. In the first place, a pirate platform service in the United States has received a demand for a very large sum of money to compensate us for the wanton stealing of three of our books, the consequence of which barbaric acts has been effectively to destroy our book publishing business. Secondly, the agents for the Google Settlement have been specifically informed by registered mail that we have written, also by registered mail, to the four universities and one public library who have entered into an agreement with Google under the so-called ‘Google Settlement’.

The universities in question are: Oxford, Stanford, Harvard and Michigan; and the public library is the New York Public Library. Our three companies have opted out of the Google Settlement, which is anyway now in some disarray.

These and related parties have been advised that if ANY of our works, published by all three of our companies, not just the intelligence books company which has already been severely ransacked, are assaulted by copyright pirates, we will take all legal measures open to us to enforce our rights and those of our authors. The rationale underlying this scourge is the false and spurious one that the intellectual property of the whole of humanity is the property of the ‘global commons’: a dirty, revolutionary piece of hypocrisy and subversion, the underlying purpose of which is to destroy small publishers so that there will be no dissenting voices to The New Underworld Order.

When time permits, we will be providing ‘further and better particulars’ concerning this outrageous revolutionary development. In the meantime, those amoral persons and parties who have so far downloaded our works are hereby warned that every single download will be traced, and that they risk being pursued for very large damages for gross and insolent breaches of our copyright.

Anyone wishing to reproduce the important anti-World Revolution article posted here must contact the Editor for written permission, on the understanding that a precise form of words that we will specify must accompany any reposting and that the entire article, with credits, must be displayed. Any deviation will be treated as a breach of copyright and dealt with accordingly [see above].

• ROGUE’S GALLERY OF DECEIVERS: Given the deceit and abuse that has been meted out to the Editor of this service since we began these investigations in 2002, the Editor plans to expose, by name, each of the primary perpetrators of deception against us, including a UK-based deceiver recently unmasked who sought to extort money for delivering sensitive packages that he never delivered. This character has been reported to the Police, and a Major Crime Book Number will be sought with a request for an investigation. The relevant documents have been sent by registered and signed-for mail, to the Special Branch officer concerned. Those who have deceived us will be made to endure the grave consequences of their serial duplicity, starting with Leo Wanta, to whom the Editor lent $35,000 to pay for his release from irregular probation, which should have been paid back on 11th June 2007 but concerning which nothing has been heard. All other collaborators and operatives who tried to deceive us at various stages will also be exposed for their deception.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and our ‘politically incorrect’ intelligence books online from this website.

• NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:

• THE STENCH OF ROTTING HUMAN FLESH IN MIDTOWN MANHATTAN

• THE INITIAL WANTA CAMPAIGN USING THE EDITOR’S PLATFORM

• DEEP LIES DISLODGED BY THE CAMPAIGN

• PAULSON SEIZES CONTROL OF THE ‘WANTA FUNDS’

• THE METHODOLOGY OF WADING THROUGH A DECEPTION MINEFIELD

• WANTA: ‘YOU ARE AN HONEST JOURNALIST, WHICH IS EXTREMELY RARE’

• ‘WALKING IN A STRAIGHT LINE’

• THE EDITOR ACCUMULATES A LARGE FILE OF DOCUMENTS

• THE ‘LINE’ THAT THE WANTA ACCOUNTS HELD SOVIET SPOIL

• REALITY: WANTA AS BUSH’S DE FACTO (DOUBLE-CROSSED) ‘BAGMAN’

• MARC RICH (HANS BRAND) AND GWENDOLYN WAYMARK

• THE EDITOR’S LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY

• WANTA SUDDENLY TRAVELS TO CALIFORNIA

• WANTA AND MADOFF: OUTLETS FOR BUSH CRIME SYNDICATE MONIES

• INFORMATION IN THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

• GOODWIN DID NOT FORWARD COURT DOCUMENTS TO WANTA

• BUSH SR. WAS ‘UPSTAIRS’: SO WANTA’S PARTY WERE KICKED OUT
OF CITIBANK’S MIDTOWN OFFICES BY ARMED NYPD AGENTS

• THE ‘FUNNY BUSINESS’ AT THE ALEXANDRIA COURTHOUSE

• HOW THE PETITION WAS EXPLOITED FOR DECEPTION PURPOSES

• AN ‘ANOMALY’ IN THE TEXT OF THE PETITION

• DECEPTION EXPERT DOUBLE-CROSSED BY DECEPTION EXPERTS

• MONEY STOLEN FROM PETER IN ORDER NOT TO PAY PAUL

• CORRUPT U.S. GOVERNMENT RAPES, MURDERS AND PILLAGES ITS OWN PEOPLE

• CURIOUS ’INTERCHANGEABILITY’ OF U.S. ‘INTELLIGENCE’ ACCOUNTS

• WANTA RELEASED FROM JAIL IMMEDIATELY AFTER 9/11

• JAILED TO PREVENT WANTA FROM LEAKING 9/11 PLOT IN ADVANCE

• OUR DEDUCTION ABOUT THE ACCOUNTS IS CONFIRMED

• PROOF THAT 9/11 WAS MASS MURDER BY THREE PRESIDENTS

• VREELAND DID PREDICT THE 9/11 ABOMINATIONS

• OUR WARNING ABORTED A NUCLEAR EXPLOSION

• PLANNING A NUKE EXPLOSION TO AVOID PAYING WANTA?

• TWIN CITIES PREDICTION JUDGED TO BE ACCURATE, TOO

• CHENEY AND STRUCTURES WORKING OVERTIME TO STOP ‘IT ALL COMING OUT’

• NEW COORDINATED 9/11 LEAKS BY ‘LICENSED’ U.S. AGENTS

• BITTER FEUDING OVER THE MONEY BY RIVAL INTEL FACTIONS

• WHOEVER WINS ELECTIONS, THE CIA/NSC ALWAYS WINS

• THE RULE OF LAW SOLUTION WILL PREVAIL: ‘SET IN STONE’

• DEVELOPING U.S. MILITARY CRISIS OVER OBAMA’S STATUS

• BANKS REFUSE TO HONOUR CALIFORNIA I.O.U.s

• THE GHANA EPISODE, PLUS: OBAMA ‘WANTS HIS CUT’

• WARRING INTEL GROUPS FURIOUS BUT IMPOTENT

• OUR THINKING ON DERIVATIVES GOES ‘MAINSTREAM’

• WARNING BY WORLD BANK’S CHIEF ECONOMIST

• GEITHNER’S ‘STANDARDISED CONTRACT’ RED HERRING

• REARGUARD OPERATION TO ‘RESCUE’ FRAUDULENT FINANCE

• DISLOCATIONS ARE DUE EXCLUSIVELY TO CORRUPTION AND FRAUD

• AUTOMATON WHITE HOUSE KEEPS ON ‘KICKING AGAINST THE PRICKS’

• PAYEE LIST REDEFINED TO INCLUDE A KEY ‘LINE ITEM PAYMENT’

• LAST-MINUTE SCAMMING OPERATIONS BY THE CROOKS

• EXCERPTS FROM A CRUCIAL AFFIDAVIT

• READ OUR SEPTEMBER 2006 PREDICTION OF THE PRESENT SITUATION IN NOTE (5) BELOW

• Relevant Notes containing extensive reference data:

(1) Extracts from a timeline analysis of the background to the Criminal Finance Crisis associated with the Editor’s personal involvement: Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 3 & 4, pages 3-25: July 2009.

(2) Banks identified by the Editor of this service from open domain documents that we retain, as holding ‘Wanta’ (‘Bush Crime Syndicate’) illicit funds (which, when ‘accepted’ by US authority, are ‘laundered via the sovereign’ and thereby legitimised).

(3) CIA proprietary US Government intelligence corporations, with which Leo Wanta was connected.

(5) Excerpts from our prediction of what would happen if the Refunding Programme (previously labelled by us ‘The Wanta Plan’) were not to be implemented expeditiously: published first on 2nd September 2006 and again on 3rd-4th December 2006 [see this website’s Archive for those dates]. Source: International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 1 & 2, pages 299-302 [Third Quarter 2007]. For this presentation, the phrase ‘The Wanta Plan’ (which, like ‘Wantagate’, we invented) is replaced by ‘The G-7-Approved Refunding Plan’.

THE STENCH OF ROTTING HUMAN FLESH IN MIDTOWN MANHATTAN
We are now approaching the eighth anniversary of the preplanned mass murder by three conniving Criminal Presidents of the United States and their lackeys of over 3,000 people in the Twin Towers on 11th September 2001. As has been stated in earlier reports, public lies are like plutonium: they have a half-life and in the experience of this Editor, the average lifespan of an official lie is about seven years. So one would expect the 9/11 lies to be shaky by now.

It is therefore no surprise that the lies surrounding 9/11 have decayed to the point when they are poised to blow the entire conspiracy into the air, with devastating consequences for all concerned, who thought they had ‘got away with it’.

When the Editor himself recovered from the shock (his youngest daughter narrowly missed being caught in the Twin Towers on the morning of this ‘Reichstag Fire’ abomination), he returned in late October 2001 to our Midtown Office, which was covered in a thin film of grey filth, and took hours to clean. The carpet in our small apartment was so filthy that it eventually had to be discarded. And the stench of rotting human flesh permeated the entire Midtown area permanently.

As a ‘visitor’, the Editor noticed the stench all the time, but he was also aware that New Yorkers appeared to have got used to it. When the Editor returned to New York City in February 2002, the stench of rotting human flesh was less evident, depending on the direction of the wind from the downtown area. There were days when it was unchanged from the situation prevailing in late October, and days when it was less or not noticeable.

In order not to hold up the following narrative, a basic timeline describing the background to the Editor’s involvement in these investigations is appended below as Note (1). This text, expanded, is to be published in Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 3 & 4, in production.

THE INITIAL WANTA CAMPAIGN USING THE EDITOR’S PLATFORM
It will be recalled that, having provided (as explained again in the timeline) $35,000 of our scarce private financing (obtained from the proceeds of a satisfactory private house sale) to pay for the shortening of Leo/Lee Wanta’s probation after his incarceration on what appeared to be trumped-up charges (like not paying $14,129 in Wisconsin State tax which we have proved from documents we hold and have published, that he paid twice over, in May and June 1992 – and which the Editor’s private funds paid a third time on 21st July 2005, with interest: see website report dated 6th August 2007 for comprehensive details), the Editor’s website and publishing platform became, with Leo Wanta’s enthusiastic agreement and on his instructions as confirmed by numerous faxed cover sheets addressed by Wanta to Prof. Christopher Story FRSA – USA Ops. sent to us with detailed information for publication on this website, the vehicle for a de facto exposure operation intended to procure the fulfilment of compensation arrangements for Wanta.

DEEP LIES DISLODGED BY THE CAMPAIGN
As this de facto campaign developed momentum, the rickety scaffolding propping up the inverted pyramid of official lies surrounding 9/11 and its underlying motivations, began to disintegrate.

The ‘Black’ inspirations for this long-planned (see below) abomination included covering up the stealing of unbelievably colossal sums of money and gold, the destruction of ‘Structured Products’ contracts, and providing the pretext to enable the Bush-CIA-DVD Financial Criminal Syndicate to attack Afghanistan for geo-energy reasons and to invade Iraq so that, to begin with, the Central Bank of Iraq, holding the counterparty assets, cash, gold, instruments, contracts and printing plates amassed by Bush Sr.’s former financial partner, Saddam Hussein, could be ransacked.

PAULSON SEIZES CONTROL OF THE ‘WANTA FUNDS’
What happened was that after Bush II had removed John Snow as Treasury Secretary and had replaced him with the criminal operative Henry M. Paulson Jr., the former Goldman Sachs CEO, the funds sent over by the People’s Bank of China (after having been released, we speculate, on the signature of Howie Kwong Kok, Wanta’s Chinese ‘partner’), ostensibly as Wanta’s ‘compensation’, were removed from the recipient institution, Bank of America, Richmond, VA, and, under Paulson’s sole signature, were lodged with Paulson’s ‘former’ institution, Goldman Sachs, placing them under contract for one year in June 2006, according to our best information and belief. This gave rise to our repeated description of Paulson as Henry M. ‘Conflict-of-Interest’ Paulson, a cognomen that understandably got up his nose, as was intended.

It will also be recalled that the CIA had lied for some years that Wanta was dead, just as they lied that Howie Kwong Kok had died from ingesting rat poison in Singapore, not long after a visit to Singapore by George H. W. Bush Sr., in 1993.

THE METHODOLOGY OF WADING THROUGH A DECEPTION MINEFIELD
Here we must interpolate an important consideration about our methodology. When investigating tangled webs of deception, the investigative journalist must be on guard at all times that he is not himself deceived, double-crossed, led up garden paths and otherwise subjected to the standard barrage of ‘Black’ tools deployed by the corrupted intelligence community, for which deception is standard procedure. Recall the classic observation of Gordon Thomas (with his MI6 and Mossad connections, about which he boasts) when the Editor tackled him in 2004-05 about the lies that he said MI6 had fed to the British press about the Editor of this service, in order to ensure that the gullible ‘mainstream’ wouldn’t take what they knew we were likely to publish (i.e. exposure of the colossal financial thefts), seriously:

‘It doesn’t matter that it’s not true. All that matters is that it’s out there’.

(In uttering this classic put-down, Gordon Thomas thereby destroyed the credibility of his entire life’s published works, including his history of Mossad: but that’s a diversion here).

WANTA: ‘YOU ARE AN HONEST JOURNALIST, WHICH IS EXTREMELY RARE’
Anyway, what we would like to insert at this point is the following clarification. In ‘assisting’ Wanta and exposing what we did between June 2006 and March 2008, the Editor and those associated with him walked in a straight line. By this we imply that any ‘honest journalist, which is extremely rare’, which was Wanta’s flattering description of this Editor, has to pursue leads which, ‘to the best of his knowledge and belief at the time’ are accurate; and as is well known, journalists are allowed some leeway, since the Fourth Estate (in our case the Fourth and the Fifth Estates) is required to do its job to hold the Executive and other branches of authority to account.

Therefore, bearing in mind this responsibility, and also the fact that one is on guard at all times against the likelihood of being deceived, one does one’s best to avoid falling into traps carefully set by devious, cynical, scheming ‘Black’ intelligence community operatives who care nothing for individuals, but only for whatever sordid agendas they happen to be juggling at given moment.

‘WALKING IN A STRAIGHT LINE’
Nevertheless, despite taking all possible precautions, one cannot be sure that one is not being lied to. The Editor knew that Wanta was a consummate deceiver, but used his discernment to identify what he thought was the genuine person behind the multiple complex tradecraft masks deception behaviour for which he was known. The Editor did not know that he had accepted funds from other parties and had never paid them back, just as he took our $35,000 on the basis of a two-year loan at 7.0%, repayable on 11th June 2007, and has not paid us a penny.

(Likewise he never paid Michael C. Cottrell anything after he had been forced to spend $14,000 on hotel accommodation etc during the 40 days during October and November 2007 when they were seeking settlement from the duplicitous Citibank in Midtown Manhattan).

If he had had any manners, Wanta, who typically answers the telephone in German (‘Guten Tag’) should at least have written to say that he was not in a position to pay the money back, but would do so when he could – which would have been an appropriate small gesture. Instead of which, he did nothing; while his Düsseldorf-born (CIA approved) lawyer, Steve Goodwin, of Richmond, VA, who drew up the loan documentation, should have taken appropriate action to address the situation.

• As he failed to do so, he is a co-conspirator in the stealing of the Editor’s funds plus interest.

Now as you will recall, after what Wanta described as a kangaroo court trial, Wanta was imprisoned for a prolonged period in 1995. He had fallen out with George Bush Sr., who falls out with everyone he deals with (‘bait and switch’): indeed double-cross is Bush Sr.’s standard modus operandi.

The falling-out with Bush Sr. centred around the colossal volume of offshore (Executive Order 12333) corporations and accounts containing vast sums of ‘Bush’ money handled.

THE EDITOR ACCUMULATES A LARGE FILE OF DOCUMENTS
Since, by 2006-07, the Editor had accumulated a very large portfolio of bank documents that had been leaked into the (obscure) public domain, inter alia by the subsequently incarcerated Office of Naval Intelligence Operative Delmart Mark Vreeland [see timeline in Note (1) below], he extracted details of these accounts from the documents in a systematic manner, and also compiled a list of the banks holding these accounts, which is re-appended as Note (2) below.

This list has been published both on this website and in International Currency Review, so it is on record all over the world, in places ‘where it matters’.

Readers are further reminded that, in the public interest, a colossal volume of documentary evidence of this systematic financial corruption involving the holders of the US highest offices, and others, has been published in successive issues of International Currency Review.

This means that Governments, Treasuries, international financial institutions, Central Banks, large financial institutions, intelligence agencies, military establishments and other interested parties all over the world have copies of these banking documents (a considerable proportion of which are reproduced in facsimile format, as well as being the subject of very extensive ongoing narrative commentaries) either sitting on bookshelves, accessible in their libraries, or otherwise held in archives. There is therefore no excuse whatsoever for the Governments and the central banks concerned – which we could name – disregarding the record which we have made available in the public interest, just as this report is proffered in the public interest.

THE ‘LINE’ THAT THE WANTA ACCOUNTS HELD SOVIET SPOIL
As the Editor and Publisher of Soviet Analyst, the Editor was a ready recipient of the ‘line’ that the colossal number of bank accounts ostensibly in Wanta’s corporate portfolio, and from which he was separated when he was arrested in Lausanne on 7th June 1993, represented accounts which held inter alia, if not mainly, the proceeds of the Financial Warfare operations that had reportedly been masterminded by Howie Kwong Kok and Wanta on the instructions of President Ronald Reagan as set out in three specific Executive Orders requiring the ‘Evil Empire’ to be brought to an end. As Wanta put it to the Editor once, Reagan ‘thought the stand-off with the Soviet Union was pointless’ and should be terminated.

REALITY: WANTA AS BUSH’S DE FACTO (DOUBLE-CROSSED) ‘BAGMAN’
But in the light of greater knowledge, deeper understanding and hard experience, the Editor reached the conclusion some time ago that the story about these offshore corporate accounts having been established to hold the proceeds of the ransacking of the Soviet Union, is false, or rather ‘economical with the truth’. It is another deception, and Wanta is party to that deception.

On the contrary, the bank accounts which we publicised in detail, giving the identities of the banks used for the purpose, represented a considerable proportion of the offshore bank accounts used by George Bush inter alia to hide the proceeds of the Bush-CIA-DVD Crime Syndicate’s massive assault on the funds of others – a theft-fest concerning which Bush Sr. uttered the notorious comment: ‘If the American people knew what we had done, they’d string us up on lamp posts’.

Well, the American people today, who are among the most intelligent on earth (as they received the best brains from Europe and elsewhere) are pretty sure what these unspeakable US criminals have done, but have not yet found a way to ensure that the criminal gangs that have been controlling the United States at the very highest levels for the past several ‘Black’ Presidencies receive the overdue decisive punishments that they deserve and that are pending. We doubt whether the dam will hold much longer, as the half-life of the supporting lies has decayed beyond their ‘expiry dates’.

MARC RICH (HANS BRAND) AND GWENDOLYN WAYMARK
Most public and intelligence sector lies contain elements of truth: so to say that the bank accounts did not include the proceeds of the wholesale ransacking of the Soviet State economy would be completely untrue, especially given the known involvement of Zug, Switzerland-based intermediary Marc Rich, exposed by this service as the long-range German DVD operative Hans Brand [refer to International Currency Review, Volume 31, Numbers 3 & 4, pages 83-96, with facsimile documents (Fourth Quarter 2006)]: indeed we have ourselves deconstructed a number of such bank account transactions, having for instance identified the Bush operative Gwendolyn Ann Waymark as named beneficiary of a Pay Order fee instruction by a Mr Paul M. Bauer arising from currency exchange of 18.699 billion Soviet Roubles, of $4,721,969.70, for account of Gwendolyn Ann Waymark and Diane M. Waymark with Bank of Massachusetts, East Long Meadow Branch, associated with the forged Status-Credit-Bank, Moscow, documents referencing the Executive Order 12333 corporation Asian Europe Development Pte. Ltd., sent to us unsolicted by Fedex on 10th September 2007. We were able to compare these documents with Status-Credit-Bank documents that we hold on file, proving the US forgery and thefts. In the same batch, Daniel Reis was to receive a commission from the stolen Russian monies, of $20,237,012.99 [see International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 3 & 4, pages 288-294 (Second Quarter 2008)], with facsimiles that prove out this forensic research.

However it is now clear that Leo Wanta was for a time a or THE guardian of ‘Bush Sr.’s accounts’, meaning offshore accounts holding stashes of stolen monies which Bush Sr. claimed belonged to him: which specifically explains why we have repeatedly heard, from the underground, that ‘Bush Sr. says the money is his’.

THE EDITOR’S LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY
These, then, are the funds which Wanta stated he was engaged in repatriating, having instructed Steve Goodwin to prepare a Power of Attorney (which the Editor had requested to be restricted specifically to information gathering) enabling the Editor, with Goodwin, to appear at Coutts Bank in April 1986 to conduct certain investigations on behalf of Wanta; and to enable the Editor to attend, which he did, at Lloyds Bank TSB, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire in late April 2006 – when he was told by the bank manager that the accounts held there in the names of specific Executive Order 12333 corporations listed on the Power of Attorney had been shifted into the PERSONAL name of Jan Morton Heger, one of Wanta’s CIA Attorneys.

WANTA SUDDENLY TRAVELS TO CALIFORNIA
Following these developments, Wanta, who was now able to travel outside Wisconsin thanks to the Editor’s funds having been applied to pay for his ‘restitution’ (and the third illegal payment of the $14,129 plus interest) so that Wanta’s probation was shortened by five years and two weeks as a consequence – suddenly disappeared out to California where he was prevailed upon to accept the ‘compromise’ ostensible remuneration package which was later associated with the visit to Beijing of Bush Sr.’s chief criminal financier, Dr Alan Greenspan, and the subsequently ousted US Treasury Secretary, John Snow.

It is believed that the California visit was specifically precipitated by the aborted investigations at Coutts, London, and Lloyds Bank which Wanta instructed the Editor of this service to pursue, as well as being driven by a conference call to Coutts Bank from Goodwin’s office in Richmond, VA, in March 2006, which instead of being taken by Mrs Burgess whom the Editor knew, was taken by a Mr Robertson, who said that Coutts had no banking relationship with Leo Wanta.

No. They had a banking relationship with George H. W. Bush Sr.

WANTA AND MADOFF: OUTLETS FOR BUSH CRIME SYNDICATE MONIES
The Bush Crime Syndicate, of course, had multiple outlets for the stealing, placement, distribution, and laundering of the vast flow of hijacked funds that it handled, of which the Madoff enterprise was one – a point that needs to be borne in mind, so that the moribund Wanta situation is seen in its proper perspective. On 9th July 2009, it was reported that Irving Picard, the Trustee appointed by the Manhattan Court to take charge of identifying assets to compensate the victims, had stated that his investigations had ‘unearthed a labyrinth of interrelated international funds, institutions and entities of almost unparalleled complexity and breadth’.

Specifically, Mr Picard revealed that stolen assets had been identified in Britain, Ireland, France, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Spain, Gibraltar, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands and the Bahamas. Mr Picard has despatched more than 230 subpoenas seeking overseas records and has received more than 15,400 claims against Madoff and his defunct Ponzi network. As in the case of the ‘Wanta’ accounts, the funds that Mr Picard is chasing are in fact ‘Bush Crime Syndicate’ funds, as Madoff was used as a key conduit for the dispersion of stolen funds (in accordance with the classic Ponzi model).

INFORMATION IN THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Wanta’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia [Civil Action No.: 1 – 07 CV 609] faxed to the Editor on 22nd June 2007 at 06:04pm UK time, and which was published in facsimile format in International Currency Review Volume 33, Numbers 3 & 4, pages 67-79 [Second Quarter 2008] states inter alia:

13: In May of 2006 the People’s Republic of China caused a free and unrestricted transfer of $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars through international bank fund transfer facilities to an account at Bank of America located at Richmond, Virginia. The designated beneficiary of the transferred funds from the People’s Republic of China was Petitioner herein [Wanta – Ed]. This transfer was made by the People’s Republic of China solely and exclusively as a requirement under the mentioned settlement agreement.

14: Upon best information and belief between the dates of July 31st to August 2nd of 2006 the United States Department of the Treasury, without authorization of either the remitting party or the receiving party removed the People’s Republic of China transferred financial assets from Bank of America, Richmond, Virginia, to an account in the name of Goldman Sachs at CITIBank New York, New York, as the beneficiary holder of the monies transferred by the People’s Republic of China referenced above. This “Chip” (Clearing House Interbank Payment) transfer was facilitated from Virginia domiciled banks to New York domiciled banks via the Federal Reserve Bank Richmond*].

[This was INCORRECT. The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond at once made it clear that they had nothing to do with it and that Wanta should file suit in the Southern District of New York, meaning that the funds were transferred from Virginia via the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, of which Timothy Geithner was the President. Therefore, self-evidently, Mr Geithner has always been fully cognisant of this dimension of the scandal, which means that Geithner is deeply compromised].

The Chip transfer did not remove the name of [the] Petitioner as the intended recipient of the transferred money from the People’s Republic of China. The transfer to the Goldman Sachs et al. account at CITIBank put a lawless restriction that the funds were not to be released to Petitioner without the authorization of [the] United States Treasury. At or about the time of [the] unauthorized transfer mentioned in this paragraph 14 Petitioner protested the alleged right of “entitlement” by Secretary Paulson, and to facilitate protest or right of ownership under the [US] “Securities Acts” accounts were opened in the name of AmeriTrust Groupe at Morgan Stanley, fiduciary account at CITIBank/NYC to receive direct deposit transfer of Petitioner funds from Goldman Sachs’.

[Note: These accounts were opened on the basis of the securities market qualifications of Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., who was then still serving as the Treasurer and Executive Vice President of Wanta’s Commonwealth of Virginia-based corporation. Mr Wanta had neither the securities market qualifications nor the legal status to open any accounts, let alone a securities market account – as he remained a felon (a state of affairs that the Editor attempted to alleviate by sending a Misprision of Felony letter on 17th October 2007 to Wisconsin State Judge James Martin, drawing the Judge’s attention again to the gross irregularities perpetrated by the Wisconsin Department of Corrections summarised in our website report dated 6th August 2007, and suggesting that the State Court might consider removing Leo Wanta’s felonious status as he had 100% fulfilled the Court’s ‘restitution’ requirements (using the Editor’s funds, now stolen [see website Archive report dated 27th October 2007]. This was the Editor’s final attempt to help Wanta over his Wisconsin probation issues).

[Wanta later claimed that he would operate with bank accounts only and erroneously stated that Mr Cottrell had required his corporation to operate a securities market account in order for Michael Cottrell be able to control Wanta’s affairs – whereas the reason for the securities account was to protect assets, since funds held in corrupted US banks are liable to be stolen, whereas clients’ assets held in US securities market accounts do not form part of the assets of the broker/dealer institution, and so are much safer in this free-for-all US financial environment].

The Petition for a Writ of Mandamus continued:

15: The Petitioner has been contacted by “Compliance Officers” that are contract employees of the United States Department of the Treasury that the transfer records of the US Department of the Treasury and the recipient (past and present holder of the funds transferred to Petitioner by the People’s Bank of China) reflect that the accounts opened to receive the financial assets are tagged and coded for the benefit of Petitioner. Access to the tagged and coded accounts requires lawless authorization to be provided in writing by Secretary Paulson. To date Secretary Paulson refuses to provide the required written authorization to the compliance officers. In addition one or more compliance officer (referenced herein) has been contacted by Secret Service Agents who have advised the compliance officers that the “White House” ordered that the compliance officers cease and desist from communicating in any manner with Petitioner.

16: Upon best information and belief the compliance officers mentioned in paragraph 15 have been in contact with law enforcement officers representing the Central Intelligence Agency [CIA] and the United States Department of Defense. These mentioned law enforcement officers confirm that the information provided by the compliance officers is true and correct and that upon best information and belief the “order” preventing Secretary Paulson from releasing the “tagged and coded” funds that are the sole and exclusive property of the Petitioner [Wanta] have been either lawlessly and individually controlled by Secretary Paulson and/or restricted through direct participation by other United States of America elected and/or nominated officials.

17: Upon best information and belief Troutman Sanders, LLP, and Jenkins & Gilchrist Parker Chapin LLP, seeking legal recourse on behalf of C.B.I.C. Inc. (Mr William Bonney Sr.) and the People’s Republic of China, obtained an Order to Show Cause Why a Writ of Mandamus Should Not Be Issued from the United States Supreme Court signed by Justice Ginsberg.

The People’s Republic of China, as a foreign Government, invoked the original jurisdiction authority of the United States Supreme Court to obtain the document signed by Justice Ginsberg. Upon further best information and belief the responding parties to the action files in the United States Supreme Court are exercising any and all assumed defenses to ward off the issuance of the Writ of Mandamus.

18: The United States Department of Justice and/or any agency or investigative authority contacted has refused to assist the Petitioner in the collection of lawful funds. [The] said parties refuse such assistance irrespective that there is clear and undisputed evidence that the subject funds are identified in official United States Government agency documents as being the sole and exclusive property of Petitioner. As of the date of the filing of this Petition, all requests for payment of lawful funds have been ignored by any and all elected and nominated public officials that have the implied and apparent authority to complete all requirements of the settlement documents.

GOODWIN DID NOT FORWARD COURT DOCUMENTS TO WANTA
The Defendants – Henry M. Paulson, Jr., Secretary of the US Treasury; Robert M. Kimmit, Deputy Secretary of the Treasury, James R. Wilkinson, Treasury Chief of Staff, Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Alberto R. Gonzales, US Attorney General, and the US Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond – obtained 60 days’ leave to respond rather than the usual 30 days. During this period, Court documents addressed to Mr Wanta sent to the AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. address at Attorney Steven Goodwin’s Richmond office, were not forwarded to Wanta (sabotage?).

A hearing on the Petition was scheduled for 19th October 2007 in the Alexandria Court, which was attended by the Editor of this service, Colonel Dana Wilcox, Michael C. Cottrell (who was then, as indicated above, still Treasurer and Executive Vice President of Wanta’s corporation) and Wanta. Goodwin did not attend but submitted an extraordinary notarised Affidavit in which he attempted to explain away the fact that his office had not sent the relevant documents to Wanta inter alia using the following language [International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 3 & 4, pages 345-346]:

‘I am the registered agent for AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.

My Staff obtains the mail at 5516 Falmouth Street, Suite 108, Richmond, Virginia 23230 and distributes the mail within the firm daily.

Mr Wanta had advised me that he had filed action in Federal Court in Alexandria and advised that mail pertaining to that case may be coming to the office.

No one from my staff has made me aware of any mail from the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond received on behalf of Mr Wanta or AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., in the matter of Wanta V. Paulson, et al.

I am aware that my office has received mail from the United States Attorney’s Office on behalf of Mr Wanta and/or AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. in the matter of Wanta, et al, v. Paulson, et al.’.

THE ‘FUNNY BUSINESS’ AT THE ALEXANDRIA COURTHOUSE
Thus, ‘whether intentionally or not’, receipt of relevant Court documents by Wanta during the 60-day period was neutralised by the office of Düsseldorf-born Attorney Steven Goodwin. Meanwhile, when Mr Wanta’s case was finally called, in the further hearing on 19th October 2007, before His Honor T. Selby Ellis III, born in Bogotà, Colombia (educated in law at Oxford University, who was appointed by President Reagan in 1987, has flown F4 Phantom warplanes off aircraft carriers, may be an Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) operative and is a former partner of the well-known CIA legal outfit Hunton and Williams, based in Washington DC), Wanta made an ass of himself on the podium, waving his arms around in a curious fashion; and essentially, Judge Ellis paid no attention to him whatsoever. On the contrary, on our return from the lunch break, Ellis suddenly stopped the proceedings, exited from the Courtroom, and returned some minutes later, having, we speculate, taken a call from a senior level in Washington (the Treasury or the White House). He proceeded to read aloud his pre-prepared conclusions which did not assist Wanta in the slightest.

Yet when we left the Courthouse and in the lobby, Wanta did not appear to be in the least disturbed at this development, which puzzled the Editor at the time. But no longer.

BUSH SR. WAS ‘UPSTAIRS’: SO WANTA’S PARTY WERE KICKED OUT
OF CITIBANK’S MIDTOWN OFFICES BY ARMED NYPD AGENTS
On 20th November 2007, as revisited in the timeline under Note (1) below, Wanta, Mr Cottrell and a third party appeared at Mr Cottrell’s request and by the bank’s invitation at the Midtown premises of Citibank for an appointment concerning the failure of the bank to remit the $4.5 trillion amount to Wanta/his corporation. Although Wanta had, during the 40-day stay in hotels in Alexandria and on Staten Island, told Michael Cottrell that ‘we must dispense with Christopher Story’s services, but don’t tell him’, the Editor was called twice in London while the party were languishing in Citibank’s lobby, after Wanta had instructed Cottrell to ‘Call Chris’.

• This ‘became necessary’ after two armed New York Police Department Officers appeared in the lobby and ordered the Wanta party off the premises.

Mr Michael C. Cottrell had requested access to senior Citibank personnel in conformity with the invitation. It transpired that Mr George H. W. Bush Sr. was present on the Directors’ floor of the building at the time, which was why a gigantic black stretched limousine with tinted windows was parked outside the bank’s Midtown Office. No doubt it was George Bush Sr. who had urged Citibank to kick the Wanta party off its premises under pain of NYPD armed arrest.

Recall now our basic comments about deception, at the beginning of this report. Recall also that Wanta had fallen out with Bush and had been incarcerated on trumped-up charges (see e.g. our report on ‘Wisconsingate’ dated 6th August 2007: website Archive). Recall further that Bush Sr.’s standard devilish modus operandi is always ‘bait and switch’, or the double-cross.

• Do not be in any way surprised, therefore, that these people lie to and double-cross each other all the time: that’s what they DO.

HOW THE PETITION WAS EXPLOITED FOR DECEPTION PURPOSES
Given the vast, rickety edifice of the fog of deception which is supposed to mask and obfuscate this corruption, do not be taken aback when we suggest to you that it seems highly probable that, accurate though the information contained in Wanta’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus largely was (or else he would have been imprisoned for perjury), nevertheless, it formed a layer of a deeper ongoing deception, which had also been supported by Wanta’s instructed and accepted use of the Editor’s publishing and website platform (see above). That arrangement suited the Bush-CIA-DVD Crime Syndicate and the chief behind-the-scenes manipulator, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, because the Editor had promulgated, to the best of his knowledge and belief, that the colossal accruals stashed in the huge portfolio of offshore accounts ‘belonged’ to Wanta under the Reagan Executive Order 12333 arrangements (January 1981), which recklessly allowed US intelligence operatives to set up corporations and to own the shares thereof.

• These corporations would then ostensibly ‘contract’ with the CIA and its 16+ subsidiaries, to conduct Financial Warfare and other ‘Black’ financial operations on behalf (ostensibly) of Uncle Sam but in reality of the power-usurping US “State within the State’ directed by the key North American Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst, Dachau, operative George H. W. Bush Sr.

(We now believe that the German Jew Henry Kissinger, who persuaded President Ford to sack William Colby as Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) and to replace him with George Bush Sr., whose family is also of German Jewish extraction, is the supreme DVD manipulator and snake inside or associated with the corrupted US structures.

Kissinger appeared at the satanic mass held in the Chapel of St Peter and St Paul described by the Editor’s late friend Fr. Malachi Martin and reviewed in the Editor’s large book The New Underworld Order, and was excommunicated from his US Jewish congregation in 1974 by a Rabbinical Court presided over by Rabbi Marvin Antelman. Of all the evil characters in this constellation of fiends, Kissinger is the most unpleasant. Following the 9/11 abomination, he appeared on a TV show and mocked the 9/11 dead in a high-pitched, squeaky voice (which identified him as being possessed, as it was not Kissinger himself who was speaking, but one of his ‘familiars’).

• On the very day of Princess Diana’s memorial service which this character attended, Kissinger was spotted that same evening in a night club, ogling at a belly-dancer).

AN ‘ANOMALY’ IN THE TEXT OF THE PETITION
Some further information needs to be extracted from the
Petition for a Writ of Mandamus before we go any further. Paragraph 4 stated:

‘Petitioner has attempted to access monies that were transferred through international bank monetary clearing systems to financial institutions located in the United States of America. The remitting party was the People’s Republic of China, People’s Bank. The remitting party designated that the transferred funds were for the sole and exclusive use and benefit of [the] Petitioner. The foreign entity that originated the inward remittance designated Petitioner as sole and exclusive recipient for the transferred money/financial instruments’.

Recalling that Greenspan and Snow travelled to China following the ‘unintended’ (because of the Editor’s ‘wild card’ intervention) termination effective 14th November 2005 of Wanta’s probation, paragraph 12 of the Petition stated as follows:

‘Premised on the representations of Secretary Snow and Chairman Greenspan, the legal services of Troutman Sanders, LLP [attorneys working for George Bush Sr. – Ed.] and Jenkins and Gilchrist Parker Chapin, LLP (Attorneys) were employed to complete the preparation and [to] administer the execution of agreements and documents referred to collectively as “Settlement Documents”. The following is a compilation of the significant parties that are represented as either obligors and/or beneficiaries of the Settlement Documents:

• Petitioner Wanta identified in this Petition
• Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (including but not limited to Land Baron/Xeno)
• National Security Agency (NSA)
• Department of Homeland Security
• Director of National Intelligence
• United States State Department
• United States Department of the Treasury
• United States Department of Defense
• The White House, including but not limited to the Offices of President and Vice President
• C.B.I.C. In. (Mr William Bonney Sr.)
• China (PRC), France, Great Britain, Germany and other foreign nations participating under one or more international “Protocol” including but not limited to the Reagan-Mitterrand Protocols.
• Others of interest not intentionally omitted as part of this Petition‘.

‘The entirety of the financial assets mentioned in the Settlements documents prepared by the above mentioned Attorneys concerns approximately $27 Trillion United States Dollars in value.

The portion attributable and payable to the Petitioner is $4.5 Trillion United States Dollars’.

Paragraph 20 of the Petition then stated:

‘Upon best information and belief, “Respondent” individuals, agencies, public, private, nominated and/or elected have knowingly, overtly, covertly and with specific intent conspired together to defraud Petitioner’ – which, as a professional deceiver himself, Wanta should have anticipated.

In an Affidavit attached to the Petition, Wanta stated in Paragraph 3:

‘During the most recent three to five years I have been attempting to coordinate the repatriating of substantive financial resources from foreign locations in the United States and cause the tax payments owed on the repatriated funds to be paid to the US Treasury. I have substantially completed the stated objective task with the assistance of one or more foreign sources’.

Given that the Editor of this service was furnished with Power of Attorney investigative powers to identify assets held in certain ‘Wanta’ offshore corporations as described above, which had been transferred into the PERSONAL name of Jan Morton Heger, one of his CIA lawyers, and given the brush-off we received from Coutts Bank, the Editor has considerable difficulty with this statement.

DECEPTION EXPERT DOUBLE-CROSSED BY DECEPTION EXPERTS
At the same time, it is clear that Wanta, a deception and double-cross expert, was indeed himself deceived and double-crossed over the $4.5 trillion ‘substitute’ compensation arrangement, which was represented to him (on the basis of our open information) as his payment to overcome the problem arising from the recklessly permissive state of affairs under Reagan’s Executive Order 12333, whereby operatives who deal exclusively in deceit and lies, were permitted to establish corporations. To allow professional liars and deceivers to operate corporations ostensibly under contract with US Government agencies was an act of supreme stupidity and folly which, of course greatly facilitated the wholesale, free-for-all ransacking and stealing of funds on a scale without historical precedent – operated under the ‘crooks’ charter known as the National Security Act of 1947 et seq. (which requires operatives to deny that they are intelligence operatives at all times).

Wanta was double-crossed because although he was ‘allowed’ to assume that he controlled (technically) the accounts of the myriad offshore corporations in question (which the Editor has separately listed in our reports [see Note (3)], in fact he was the de facto custodian of accounts used by Bush Sr. to hide some of the colossal accruals arising from the Bush-Clinton Criminal Syndicate’s pillaging of other people’s funds, including funds of participants in the Ponzi-model ‘Prosperity’ and ‘Humanitarian’ Programs. These funds were stolen from the participants, who broke the ‘Prudent Man Rule’, necessitating the installation of a deeply cynical, long-running, ongoing programme of diversionary agitation and propaganda designed to throw sand in the eyes of the estimated 320,000 pillaged victims, so that the stolen money remains stolen indefinitely (at least, that was what was intended). After all, under the classic Ponzi model, Peter is robbed to pay Paul: but under the more sophisticated Bush Crime Syndicate model, there is no intention to pay Paul whatsoever, i.e. the money is STOLEN: PERIOD.

The Clinton version of this is to ask the rhetorical question: who is Paul?

MONEY STOLEN FROM PETER IN ORDER NOT TO PAY PAUL
In order to prevent Peter from taking matters into his own hands, a barrage of convoluted and diversionary disinformation and interwoven fairytales has to be sustained for years on end – a chore that paid agents engaged for this sordid purpose must find tedious in the extreme, quite apart from being so soul-destroying, cruel and degrading.

Of course, the perpetrators of the thefts couldn’t care less that many families have been disrupted, marriages destroyed, people have died destitute and in despair, and suicides arising out of the scandalous state of affairs, have been reported.

They set about the stealing of the Ponzi scam victims’ money, they stole their money, and they then ordered an open-ended barrage of confusing, endlessly self-contradictory propaganda to keep the Ponzi victims hoping that their stolen money would be restored. Whether it will be restored or not, we don’t know. All we know about is the cruel, orchestrated, non-stop caterwauling which has been deliberately and cynically installed just to keep these poor people quiet.

CORRUPT U.S. GOVERNMENT RAPES, MURDERS AND PILLAGES ITS OWN PEOPLE
And the fact that the US Government’s pays cadres to disseminate such despicable lies and diversionary propaganda to the victims of the Government’s own predatory organised criminal corruption, is itself a scandal of unforgivable proportions. A Government that exists to serve the people has systematically raped, murdered and pillaged them instead – to satisfy the sordid greed and lust of a deviant bunch of mentally defective, dirty-minded criminal operatives feuding among themselves and serving in some cases foreign enemy masters.

For make no mistake: The long-range pan-German Abwehr plan to establish ‘the Thousand-Year Reich on the Ruins of the United States’, stated in Nazi documents seized by the Allies at the end of the Second World War would have been consummated had exposures of the financial corruption not brought about the disintegration of the inverted pyramid of lies, with the truly remarkable consequences that are about to unfold.

CURIOUS ’INTERCHANGEABILITY’ OF U.S. ‘INTELLIGENCE’ ACCOUNTS
The fact that the offshore corporate accounts and monies from which Wanta was removed when Bush Sr., in collaboration with the Clinton White House and the Governor of Wisconsin, Tommy Thompson, arranged for him to be arrested in Lausanne on 7th July 1992 on a charge of having failed to pay Wisconsin State tax (even though of course Wisconsin has no external jurisdiction), appear to be ‘interchangeable’ between US operatives, was made apparent to the Editor of this service when he made the discovery in April 2006 that the ‘Wanta’ corporate accounts held with Lloyds Bank TSB, Aylesbury, had been shifted into the PERSONAL name of ‘former’ Wanta CIA lawyer Jan Morton Heger.

How is this possible? The Editor cannot answer that question: but what he CAN do is to record that Wanta told him, when the Editor queried why the accounts had been moved unto the name of Jan Morton Heger, that ‘intelligence operatives can do things like that’.

• Nor did he seem in the slightest concerned that he no longer controlled these accounts, even though he had provided the Editor with a limited Power of Attorney to establish their status.

So, on the one hand, Wanta needed to know their status, while on the other hand, he wasn’t ‘phased’ that the accounts had slithered into the control of Jan Morton Heger. The Lloyds TSB Manager himself asked the Editor how much money the accounts contained. Of course the Editor had no idea, but he answered: ‘Billions’.

WANTA RELEASED FROM JAIL IMMEDIATELY AFTER 9/11
As noted, Wanta was incarcerated and undoubtedly suffered badly during his time in the Gulag. Then 9/11 occurred. What happened next? On or around 19th September 2001, which is to say just over ONE WEEK AFTER 9/11, Wanta was suddenly RELEASED FROM JAIL.

Specifically Mr Wanta was collected by AUSTRIAN-BORN Gerald Seichert, and was driven to his daughter’s home in Wisconsin, where he languished under probation until the Editor of this service paid for the Court’s ‘restitution’ (payment of the $14,129 in State tax for the third time (plus interest) which had already been paid TWICE, in May and June 1992), as a consequence of which Wanta’s probation was shortened by five years and two months (from the scheduled expiry date of 28th November 2010, to the 14th November 2005, when Mr Matthew J. Frank, Secretary, the Wisconsin Department of Corrections, signed his Absolute Discharge [see facsimile: International Currency Review, Volume 31, Numbers 3 & 4, page 202 (Fourth Quarter 2006)].

In passing here, we may record that there was an ominous DELAY of four months between the Editor’s payment of his private money by Steven Goodwin to the Wisconsin State Department of Corrections on 21st July 2005, and the Absolute Discharge on 14th November, during which period the Editor became extremely concerned. It appears that agonised discussions were taking place behind the scenes, as the CIA had disseminated the lie that Wanta was dead; and now, all of a sudden, he was able to move around and prove that he wasn’t.

• But why was Wanta suddenly released from jail just over a week following 9/11? Clearly the two events were linked – a matter that had puzzled the Editor for a long time.

UNTIL, that is, the Editor finally realised that the so-called ‘Wanta’ accounts were/are some of the so-called ‘Bush Sr.’ accounts, which is why George Bush Sr. says ‘the money is mine’.

JAILED TO PREVENT WANTA FROM LEAKING 9/11 PLOT IN ADVANCE
On 14th July 2009, the Editor obtained specific confirmation from an impeccably knowledgeable US source of the accuracy of his deduction that the so-called ‘Wanta’ accounts were indeed some of (if not most of) the accounts then used by Bush to stash stolen and other monies arising not just from the Financial Warfare operations against the Soviet Union (which was also partly true) but, more generally, from endless criminal finance operations conducted under cover of Bush’s de facto control of the CIA-Intelligence Power: hence Langley’s formal designation as ‘the George Bush Center for Intelligence’.

• As we have stated previously, the word ‘Terrorism’ should be substituted for ‘Intelligence’ here – not least since money-laundering, the ongoing stealing of funds, and illicit ‘Black’ finance scams generally are TERRORISM as defined by the perpetrators’ own pre-prepared Patriot Act legislation.

Now, what had happened was that Bush Sr. and Clinton and the CIA conspired to remove Wanta, a difficult character, from access to the accounts by concocting the farrago of lies and diversionary claptrap that we have recounted at length in our ‘Wantagate’ reports. The ‘falling out’ was in fact a standard ‘switch’ or double-cross perpetrated by the Godfather Bush against an operative who had originally been entrusted with certain tasks, including US Financial Warfare Operations against the Soviet Union, by President Reagan, who had called Wanta ‘my junkyard dog’. Wanta himself told the Editor that Reagan used to brief him personally, and that George Bush Sr. (then Vice President and therefore in charge of the National Security Council) was usually not present at these briefings.

OUR DEDUCTION ABOUT THE ACCOUNTS IS CONFIRMED
When the Editor enquired on 14th July 2009 whether his deduction that the Wanta offshore accounts were/are ‘Bush Sr.’ accounts, which was CONFIRMED, he also asked: ‘Why was Wanta released from jail almost immediately after 9/11?’ Wanta was suddenly collected from jail (see above) by Gerald Siechert, of Austrian extraction, and driven to his daughter’s home. WHY?

The authoritative answer to this question:

• Because Wanta knew about the planned 9/11 operation, and the Three Presidents (Bush Sr., Clinton, Bush) and their co-conspirators were concerned that Wanta, who had fallen out with Bush (and was deeply resentful of the way he had been treated) might reveal what he knew IN ADVANCE OF the atrocity. But after it had occurred, that was no longer a problem, so he was released’.

• Have you understood the significance of what has just been stated?

Recall that the former President of Italy, Francesco Cossiga, told Corriera della Sera, Italy’s most respected newspaper, on 5th December 2007, that ‘the disastrous 9/11 attack has been planned and realised by the CIA and Mossad’. There is no way that such a senior intelligence officer as a former Italian President would make such a statement, if it was not true: WHICH IT IS.

PROOF THAT 9/11 WAS MASS MURDER BY THREE PRESIDENTS
THREE Presidents of the United States, with the CIA and Mossad [see below] conspired to murder over 3,000 people in order to achieve their filthy, sordid objectives. Not only is this a case of mass murder, for which ALL OFFICIALS WHO HAVE STOOD IN THE WAY OF THE ARREST OF THESE THREE CRIMINAL MURDERERS stand likewise accused of aiding and abetting mass murder and likely breach of the Misprision of Felony Statute, but we are dealing with TREASON as well.

It is BEYOND A DISGRACE that law enforcement in the United States has not arrested these mass murderers. We all know that elements of law enforcement are themselves corrupt and/or ‘work for’ George Bush Sr. and his imploding, defeated criminal syndicate. But now that the economic and financial consequences of the operations of these criminal elements at the highest levels of the US Government – including inside the Obama White House – are destroying the lives of many millions of Americans and dragging the Rest of the World into a depression with prospectively devastating consequences for humanity, it is GROTESQUE that this criminal crisis is being allowed to continue because the American elements concerned haven’t got the basic guts to arrest these gangsters without further ado. Robert Gates, the current Pentagon Chief, was formerly the CIA’s Director of Central Intelligence: does he therefore lack all traces of integrity?

VREELAND DID PREDICT THE 9/11 ABOMINATIONS
Office of Naval Intelligence operative Lt. Delmart Mark Vreeland, whom the Editor interviewed at length in Niagara Falls, Canada, in May 2003 [see timeline, Note (1)] DID reveal IN ADVANCE the intended atrocity, in his Prison Note, written from a jail cell in Canada, in August 2001. He managed to have his information transferred to Canadian intelligence contacts, who are therefore implicated in the atrocity if they did nothing. They certainly did not resort to the ONLY weapon that works: pre-emptive publicity. No, they preferred people to die en masse, rather than to stick their necks out.

Vreeland’s ‘Prison Note’, written in August 2001, contained the exclamations: ‘They will paint me crazy and call me a liar. Let one happen, stop the rest!!!’ Having interviewed Vreeland over a period of several days in May 2003, the Editor is certain that, while this operative was/is an induced MK-ULTRA-type ‘multiple personality disorder’ victim (whose various ‘alters’, including an ‘assassin alter’ can be activated by pre-programmed phrases delivered by handlers) – and despite his serial low-life criminal behaviour and that he scammed the Editor’s VISA card to the tune of £1,600, he told the truth in discussions about global issues.

In the course of a live interview on 5th June 2002, Vreeland said that he conveyed his warning about 9/11 in advance of the event, to Canadian intelligence. ‘Yes I did, most definitely. I told it to their face, my lawyers told them to their face, and they knew what was going on. As far as I know, Colonel Kispel and his partner informed the United States and Ottawa immediately, through the RCMP and NSIS and CSIS [Canadian intelligence organisations]. (4)

In March 2005, the Editor was informed by a Pentagon-linked operative that Vreeland (who had threatened the Editor with death while he was riding from Niagara Falls back to New York City in May 2003, in a bizarre ‘switch’ attempt) ‘is in solitary confinement for a very long time, his case is sealed, and he is no longer a threat to you’. However the fact that Vreeland has been ‘taken down’ does NOT invalidate the accuracy of his geopolitical information, of the information he conveyed to this Editor about the endless damage and evil that George Bush Sr. has inflicted upon the United States and the world, and of his ACCURATE prior warning about 9/11.

• MORE DETAILS ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED TO VREELAND:
Correspondents have mined the prison data and have provided the Editor [17th July 2009] with the following information. After his arrest in Iowa in October 2004, Vreeland was convicted in 2006 of 13 felony charges, and was sentenced in October 2008 to 336 years in prison in Colorado. His current so-called ‘facility assignment’ is Buena Vista Correctional Complex. His estimated Parole Eligibility Date is 2nd June 2124. His Parole Hearing Date is 1st March 2124, when he will be 156 years old.

Vreeland was indeed a low-life criminal, but what is (deliberately) not understood is that the ONI recruits such personnel for some of its operations. This practice has the advantage that when the time comes to dispense with the operative’s services, the ONI operative in question can easily be discredited because of their serial criminal behaviour, as in Vreeland’s case. However as a multiple personality disorder MK-ULTRA-type victim, Vreeland was perfectly lucid (and was extremely well informed and intelligent) provided he was ‘on his meds’, and the right ‘alter’ was being consulted.

His knowledge of certain matters in the Soviet Union was accurate (which the Editor, who is also the Editor of Soviet Analyst, knew, because of his own special knowledge), and the details that he provided concerning the criminal international operations of George Bush Sr., conveyed to the Editor by Vreeland in May 2003, were subsequently found by the Editor to be true.

In the Editor’s opinion, his undoubtedly necessary conviction on 13 of multiple felony charges was actually allowed to go forward because he had opened one of three diplomatic bags which he had couriered from Moscow, which is treason. Colin Powell, Secretary of State du jour, had issued a Warrant for his extradition from Canada, which the Canadian authorities had failed to execute.

• Moreover Vreeland’s exclamation ‘Let one happen, stop the rest!!!’ encapsulates what was intended with respect to 9/11 – which Wanta knew about ahead of the event, as well.

OUR WARNING ABORTED A NUCLEAR EXPLOSION
The Editor is informed by reliable sources that our exposure of what we knew about a plan under the Bush II Administration to explode a nuclear device on US soil, resulted in the operation being aborted. The Editor had sent a message to a source linked to US military personnel containing the following sentence: ‘Does the military realise that these criminals are playing nuclear blackmail on US soil as their leverage to avoid paying the (Wanta) Settlement? If they don’t (which I doubt) they need to now!. Please inform the Colonel of my views urgently’: see our report dated 25th October 2007: Archive. In the subsequent two segments, we wrote:

PLANNING A NUKE EXPLOSION TO AVOID PAYING WANTA?
Whether these fears were well founded or not, the ruthlessness of the cornered criminals that we have been having to deal with these past 18 months is undoubtedly such that they would be willing to go to any lengths to get their own way. After all, they were prepared to sacrifice the lives of more than 3,000 people on 9/11, inter alia to procure the destruction of the original copies of a mountain of derivatives contracts held by Cantor Fitzgerald that were falling due imminently for settlement in US dollars. The firm lost 658 of its staff in that abomination.

During the chaos, a huge volume of gold was stolen from the underground vaults of Bank of Nova Scotia. After getting away with those atrocities, the idea that a man like Cheney, a ‘former’ satanic MK-Ultra and Omega controller and operative with links into organised crime, would cringe at a rogue operation to indulge in nuclear blackmail on US soil in order to create conditions under which the stolen $4.5 trillion could be retained and not transferred to the corporate securities account with Morgan Stanley, New York, would be fanciful.

• The military Colonel’s response to the Editor’s message on this score, received by our veteran intermediary on 19th October was: ‘He is probably correct’.

TWIN CITIES PREDICTION JUDGED TO BE ACCURATE, TOO
It has been acknowledged by several special sources that the Editor was ‘probably correct’ too, about the intended Twin Cities atrocity which we exposed last April [2007]. Under that scenario, a nuclear device was to be exploded in the Twin Cities of Minneapolis-St Paul on 1st September 2008 – the (very late) opening date for the pre-election Republican National Convention.

Using Kabbalistic Illuminati numerology [which these madmen go by], that date devolves to 9/11 [September: 9; 1 (first of the month); 2008 = 2+8 = 10; +1 = 11]. Since it is well known that these maddened Luciferians have a hang-up about TWINS, the long-range strategic takeover plan called for a catastrophic atrocity at the beginning of the Bush II reign on 9/11 with the destruction of the Twin Towers, followed at the end of the Bush II reign with a catastrophic abomination in the Twin Cities in the course of which the Republican Party would be destroyed – providing the pretext for the perpetuation of Bush II under a dictatorship.

CHENEY AND STRUCTURES WORKING OVERTIME TO STOP ‘IT ALL COMING OUT’
In line with the tendency of officials lies to decay within a rough time-span of seven years, former Vice President Cheney, the embodiment of CIA evil, has been engaged for weeks in pre-emptive public appearances in anticipation of an emerging high-voltage campaign, which appears to be orchestrated, to discredit him and make him the scapegoat for the 9/11 and other atrocities – so that the Three Criminal American Presidents, the CIA and Mossad somehow manage to avoid the consequences of their crimes.

Apart from the Three Criminal Presidents, of these perpetrators, by far the most reckless seems to be Mossad and its faction inside the highest-level US structures, starting with the White House. These people appear to believe that a repetition of mass pogroms against the Jews which erupted in Germany, innocent as well as those who are complicit in all the corruption and abominations, is becoming more and more likely, as more of the suffering population wakes up to the extraordinarily elevated level of people of Jewish extraction who are implicated in these scandals.

NEW COORDINATED 9/11 LEAKS BY ‘LICENSED’ U.S. AGENTS
Recent revelations by ‘licensed’ US agents implicating Richard Cheney in preparations for the 9/11 abominations can hardly be considered coincidental. An allegation that Cheney, Scooter Libby and the CIA operative Stephen A. Cambone discussed with Osama Bin laden (CIA operative Tim Osman) the use of Al-Qaeda-CIA operatives to be employed as patsies and fall guys in the 9/11 context, and repeated information about the pre-9/11 involvement of Cheney, Libby and Rumsfeld , together with a new wave of 9/11 detail, are now being widely disseminated.

In his analysis dated 10th July, Wayne Madsen reported on the National Security Agency’s own internal ‘security’ force, known as the ‘Q’ Group, which he said ‘has grown to an immense security and counter-intelligence force, with an estimated 1,000 Government employees, contractors and paid informants. NSA’s Security force is reportedly primarily tasked with plugging any leaks of classified or other information that point to the US Government’s involvement with the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001’. Madsen elaborated:

‘NSA Security is also able to utilize the Agency’s most sophisticated electronic surveillance systems to monitor the activities of journalists’ – as the Editor of this service knows only too well, as every telephone conversation on both sides of the Atlantic attracts hoards of these impertinent electronic eavesdroppers, working for Fort Meade, GCHQ, Munich (DVD), Paris, you name it. This enables the Editor to play these nasty people along at their own game, of course.

‘The cell phones’, wrote Madsen, ‘of journalists are routinely used as listening devices, even when turned off. And what was considered a sure-fire method of avoiding having a cell phone used as a transmitter – removing the batteries in what became known as ‘batteries out’ conversations – is no longer safe’. Interestingly, the Pentagon-related operative referenced above asked the Editor to remove the batteries from his cell phone, which he also did – indicating that US operatives seem to be more concerned about their own competing agencies eavesdropping on their conversations, than about talking with ‘foreign’ parties.

‘Even when the batteries are removed, the Global Positioning System (GPS) chip in cell phones continues to have enough residual power that two or three pings from satellites can give away a person’s location, plus what other uniquely identifiable cell phones are at the same location’.

‘The bottom line is that a number of NSA personnel who were on duty in the months leading up to 9/11, the day of the attacks, and subsequent weeks and months, are aware of undeniable facts that point to a massive cover-up by the Bush-Cheney Administration of the circumstances surrounding 9/11 ’ – and the resulting stench of the rotting corpses of 3,000 human beings – ‘including what actually befell UA flight 93 and WHO was issuing direct military orders from the White House’.

‘The Obama Administration… has turned up the heat and is resorting to even more draconian methods to ensure silence. The word from inside NSA is that a state of fear exists and the mission of the Agency – to conduct surveillance of foreign communications to provide threat indications and warnings to US troops and policymakers and protect sensitive US Government communications from unauthorized eavesdropping – is suffering as a result’.

On 15th July, Madsen further reported that ‘The Obama Administration has shown every indication of protecting Cheney and other top Bush Administration officials from scrutiny. Obama recently extended Cheney’s Secret Service protection by six months, an indication that the White House is concerned that international arrest warrants for homicide may soon be issued against the former Vice President’, one of the most evil creatures ever to have occupied the US Vice Presidency.

• For ‘Obama Administration and ‘White House’ here, read Rahm Emanuel. Israel Defence Force and Mossad ‘Kidon’ (Bayonet) personnel are reported to have penetrated the Pentagon under Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and Feith, according to Madsen.

BITTER FEUDING OVER THE MONEY BY RIVAL INTEL FACTIONS
Complicating the chaos within the gigantic US Intelligence Power is a bitter ongoing internal power struggle that, broadly speaking, reflects a deadly conflict between the Bush-Kissinger-Greenspan dominated DVD-oriented Crime Syndicate element, and the components opposed to the ‘Germans’ inside the corrupted and feuding US structures.

However, far from placing the interests of the nation at the top of their agenda, the ‘non-Bushites’ have been fighting the Bush-directed cabal over the money. The two broad divisions spend their time fighting for control of the stolen funds: that’s what they DO. And the Bush Syndicate people are assisted in this endeavour by the Mossad Israelis, including the very sinister ‘Political Action Committee’ represented inside the White House especially by Rahm Emanuel.

The endless warfare between these two broad groups within the fractious US Intelligence Power concerns control of the money and nothing else, requiring some modification of our hitherto perhaps too monolithic view of the Intelligence Power.

According to that analysis, the arrogant ‘State within the State’, represented by the CIA and its 16+ ‘subsidiaries’ and the National Security Council controlled by the Vice President, has usurped control of the Federal Government . The basic means by which this has been achieved has been the familiar one of ensuring that candidates for and occupants of the highest positions within the structures are controlled intelligence operatives who answer to their handlers. The Intelligence Power has achieved this illicit status thanks primarily to its ‘penetration powers’. The other two sides of the power triangle – the Military Power and the Party Power (divided dialectically into two controlled segments) – are thus penetrated and largely controlled by the Intelligence Power.

WHOEVER WINS ELECTIONS, THE CIA/NSC ALWAYS WINS
Therefore, it is essentially neither here nor there which political party wins elections, since the Intelligence Power always wins. There is no difference between this system and the overt or covert Soviet model, where elections also take place: but it is likewise neither here nor there who wins in the overt or covert USSR, as the controlling Communist Establishment (which operates currently underground and through Putin’s Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) apparat) always wins.

Bitter rivalry, tension and warfare within the US Intelligence Power over control of the stolen and diverted money means ironically, however, that the huge Intelligence Power has weakened itself, since ‘a house divided against itself cannot stand’. However this is a brutally strong and arrogant house, accustomed to getting its own way, and ruthless in the execution of its plans (although not quite as ruthless as the Mossad ‘Kidon’ cadres with which elements of the US Intelligence Power collaborate). Even more ironically (for the uninitiated, at any rate) is the odd reality that the sole remaining ruthless supporters of the Bush Financial Criminal Syndicate within the criminalist Intelligence Power nexus, are the Mossad Israelis.

THE RULE OF LAW SOLUTION WILL PREVAIL: ‘SET IN STONE’
With these considerations in mind, let’s review some recent developments. It is understood that on or about 11th July, after hastily convened meetings in various locations in the Washington area, a delegation flew in a rush to London. Our understanding is that certain clarifications were sought from highest levels in the British capital following the conveyance of certain papers by fax that we can’t go into [see earlier references to papers submitted to Thames Valley Police, Special Branch].

The US delegation received the answer they didn’t want, namely that the payee list had been redefined to conform with original requirements last weekend and to incorporate a certain designated line payment, which instruction can be summarised as follows:

• The Rule of Law will be applied in accordance with specified required arrangements,
and this is ‘set in stone’.

This setback shocked the US participants, coming so soon after supposed President Obama had been given a flea in his ear in Moscow, where, according to reports, officials refused to shake his hand. We presume that this gesture was intended to indicate that they couldn’t shake his hand as Moscow ‘doesn’t know’ whether President Obama is legitimately in office or not.

DEVELOPING U.S. MILITARY CRISIS OVER OBAMA’S STATUS
As is now well known, Major Stefan Frederick Cook, a US Army Engineer, who was called up to serve in Afghanistan but had protested that he could not conscientiously comply since he could only accept orders from a Commander-in-Chief who holds his position legitimately, suddenly had his call-up revoked by the Department of the Army, US Army Human Resources Command, St Louis, MO, implying a belated recognition by the US Military that there is doubt even in the Pentagon over the President’s legitimacy.

Clearly, this state of affairs represents a grave crisis because should the situation not be regularised, and if the logic of the matter were to be followed through, all US military deployments and operations would have to cease, with the personnel being recalled from theatre – which could be what underlies this extraordinary state of affairs. If we pursue this logic further, we can see how the United States’ enemies would benefit from this dimension of the crisis, which ‘just happens’ to coincide with the deliberate, instrumental, perverse and clearly calculated sabotage at the highest levels of the Settlements payouts – blockage of which is directly associated with the non-payment of the Obama Stimulus monies (barely 10% of which has apparently been remitted) and therefore non-payment of promised funding to the desperate US States.

BANKS REFUSE TO HONOUR CALIFORNIA I.O.U.s
As a consequence, California is issuing IOUs which, when we last checked, banks were refusing to honour. It is understood that paychecks due to State employees in certain States were not paid on time (Pennsylvania being a case in point), and that ad hoc arrangements such as California State employees being ordered not to come in to work on the final three Fridays of each month, are spreading across the nation.

In California, according to Martin D. Weiss PhD, counties are awash with mortgage meltdown data: on 22nd June, Weiss reported that 5.32% of Los Angeles County mortgages were 90 days past due, with the following figures for many other counties: Monterrey County, 8.02%; Imperial, 8.13%; San Bernardino, 8.66%; Madeira, 9.21%; San Joaquin, 9.53%; Riverside, 10.2%; Merced, 10.57%.

With foreclosures skyrocketing, the State’s unemployment rate had surged to 11.5% by June, with 739,500 jobs having been lost since June 2008. California’s projected $24.3 billion State budget assumes no further deterioration of the economy, whereas the reality is that if the crude sabotage directed from the White House continues, the downward spiral will guarantee a deficit twice that size, with an unemployment rate approaching 20% and California’s credit rating, already the lowest of all US States, reduced to junk status.

• There are in any case indications that the true rate of unemployment in the United States, measured on discarded criteria, may already be approaching 20%.

THE GHANA EPISODE, PLUS: OBAMA ‘WANTS HIS CUT’
Unconfirmed reports were received in this office that, having been rebuffed in Moscow, Obama and/or his entourage attempted, even at this very late stage, to ‘do deals’ in Ghana, where, as in Moscow, ‘everything fell apart’. That would have reflected the presence in the Ghanaian capital of British intelligence advisers who serve the only upholder of the Rule of Law in this context: Her Majesty The Queen. MI5 operates in all Commonwealth countries.

There have also been references from ‘underworld’ sources gathered by this service that one reason for the continued White House sabotage operations is that ‘Obama wants his cut’.

According to sources the previous three corrupt Presidents became billionaires or more, and Obama sees no reason why these precedents should not be followed in his case, too.

WARRING INTEL GROUPS FURIOUS BUT IMPOTENT
When the team returned to Washington from London having been informed that the Rule of Law is to be applied and that the existing required Settlement arrangements will not be varied, the two warring components of the criminalised US Intelligence Power, neither of which has the interests of the American people or the Rest of the World in focus, were believed now to be at each others’ throats, furious and sullen like spoiled children who cannot get their own way, but impotent – and not just because the Rule of Law presupposes the developing total and absolute termination of exotic, illicit, untaxed off-balance sheet financing consistently with Basel-II and Basel-III, and with the legitimate requirements of the wronged British supreme power.

Specifically, the two warring intelligence community factions had to contemplate, at weekend meetings in the White House and elsewhere, the reality that NEITHER side within the Intelligence Power has ‘won’, but rather that the Dollar Refunding process requested by The Queen when she asked the G-7 powers to proceed with it ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’ in 2006, will prevail. Dealings will take place with the party who is neutral and can be trusted and who does not belong to, or have anything to do with, the warring factions, as everyone ‘in the know’ is well aware.

Sources allied with the Bush Syndicate in touch with this service have ceased contact since we published the preceding report stressing the tax, tax evasion and money laundering angle. Others with whom we have been in contact through our intermediaries have been told that they have to comply – all of which has come as a shock to certain parties, which had every intention of carving up the cake in accordance with their own preferences rather than with what was agreed and is required for consistency with the Rule of Law. Tax will be deducted at source: the Internal revenue Service will be paid and funds will be remitted net of tax [see the preceding report concerning tax liabilities and the tax evasion and money laundering dimension].

Accordingly, to back up the released money, the United States was reported on 14th October to be buying up gold, a process believed to have been completed by close of business on that day.

OUR THINKING ON DERIVATIVES GOES ‘MAINSTREAM’
Interestingly, Bloomberg reported on 15th July that Mark Mobius, Executive Chairman of Templeton Asset Management in Singapore, was reported to have said in a telephone interview from Istanbul on 13th July that a new financial crisis will develop in a few years’ time as a consequence of failure to regulate derivatives and the additional overall global liquidity that is ostensibly to be disbursed associated with stimulus spending. ‘Political pressures from the investment banks and from all the people that make money in derivatives’ will prevent adequate regulation, Mobius said, echoing the long published assessment of this service. ‘Banks make so much money with these things that they don’t want transparency because the spreads are so generous when there’s no transparency’. He added that a ‘very bad’ crisis may emerge within five to seven years as stimulus money adds to financial volatility, after Governments have pledged about $2.0 billion in stimulus spending.

But as we have seen, in the United States, hardly any of that money has been forthcoming – due exclusively to the sabotage of the Settlements and infighting within the CIA over control of the money, referenced above. While this selfish and criminal behaviour has persisted, the world’s biggest banks have written down and lost at least $1.5 trillion because the bottom fell out of the derivatives sector when the real cash-cash sovereign funds were placed into ‘lockdown’ between 10th and 12th September 2008, as advised by this service. Against that background, the oil price, falsified due to criminal speculation in syndicate-participating oil corporations’ dealing rooms, fell steeply from around $147 per barrel, to about $30 in the final quarter of 2008. Global share markets lost 50% of their value in 2008, shedding $28.7 trillion.

WARNING BY WORLD BANK’S CHIEF ECONOMIST
The Chief Economist with the World Bank, Justin Lin, said on 15th July that $30 trillion had (prior to that very day’s stock market surge) been wiped off global stock markets, and $4.0 trillion off US house prices. Mr Lin was particularly concerned that the global real economy could easily fall into a ‘deflationary spiral’ if excess industrial capacity is not cut back. ‘Excess capacity has built up, and unless this issue is addressed, we will face a deflationary spiral’.

Thus, while the corrupt financial sector has been partially rescued, the real economy is in absolute agony and threatens to drag the whole world into a black hole – thanks to the perverse, criminal, intransigent, terrorist, treasonous sabotaging operations conducted from the Intelligence Power-controlled White House under four US Presidents.

It is already the case that productive capacity usage has fallen to 72% in Germany, 69% in the United States, 65% in Japan and below 50% in some large developing countries. In the United Kingdom, unemployment in the three months to the end of May jumped to 7.6%, a 12-year high – confirming anecdotal evidence known to the Editor of this service of firms systematically trawling through their payroll to assess who they can sack next.

In a global downwave, countries cannot count on competitive currency depreciation as a way out to boost exports, since export markets are unable to respond. ‘No country can count on currency depreciation and exports as a way out. Unless we deal with excess capacity, it will wreak havoc on all countries’, Mr Lin added. The Japanese real economy, where headline inflation has again turned negative at – 1.1%, and deflation has now returned to stay, will shrink by 7% in real terms this year, following a catastrophic 14.2% annualised output contraction in the first quarter, when the trade account moved into deficit as well.

GEITHNER’S ‘STANDARDISED CONTRACT’ RED HERRING
Incredibly, the US Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner, who only knows about derivatives, has recently urged Congress to ‘rein in’ the derivatives sector, which has virtually collapsed (see above) with legislation that would be ‘difficult to evade’. The US Treasury Secretary essentially repeated Mr Obama’s ‘call’ to compel exchanges or ‘regulated platforms’ to apply ‘standardised’ derivatives contracts, and to regulate all dealers. This latest Geithner intervention is almost beyond belief, as it presupposes (a) that contracts for fraudulent ‘assets’ with no known value (beyond ‘what someone is prepared to pay for them’) and no recourse to real underlying income streams, can be made ‘uniform’; and (b) that his earlier free-wheeling insistence that the derivatives sector must be reignited was perhaps, er, a little over-hasty.

REARGUARD OPERATION TO ‘RESCUE’ FRAUDULENT FINANCE
For his part, Tim Ryan, head of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, told The Financial Times [7th July 2009] that ‘the securitisation market has seized up’. He then uttered the following ‘Geithnerism’: ‘We are convinced that getting securitisation started again is the single most important question facing the capital markets today’.

A Citi Group report, cited in the same newspaper analysis, has stated that ‘about $8,700 billion of assets are currently funded by securitisation [globally] … and [if] this securitised leverage matures with no replacement, global economies will be forced to contract’ – which, being interpreted, would mean that replacement, given that the securitisation market has ‘dried up’, will not materialise.

That is indeed, the case, because this illicit, exotic off-balance sheet financing is finished. That was then: this is now. The Rule of Law will be applied and the dislocations that are talking place will be alleviated when funds arising from transparent taxable transactions are deposited ON-balance sheet, ONTO the books, consistently with the Rule of Law norm that will prevail.

DISLOCATIONS ARE DUE EXCLUSIVELY TO CORRUPTION AND FRAUD
Conversely, the dislocations that have taken place and which continue today, are exclusively the consequence of the sabotage operations directed against the Rule-of-Law Settlements from the White House under four Presidents, with the enthusiastic assistance of serial criminal financial enterprises like Citibank – all of which, with their associates, have been engaged in perpetrating Financial Terrorism against the American people and the Rest of the World, given the feuding US intelligence community background described in outline above.

Put another way, it is too late for the likes of the criminal financial enterprise Citigroup to try to blackmail the world in the manner implied by its cited warning that further securitisation may not be forthcoming to cover maturities on $8,700 billion of assets around the world.

• Citi was itself extensively responsible for this state of affairs, and it is now too late to attempt to reverse the damage for which it is partly responsible.

On the contrary, the Rule of Law will prevail and the criminal financial enterprises, including the disaffected, warring, self-centred components of the US Intelligence Power, will comply with it.

AUTOMATON WHITE HOUSE KEEPS ON ‘KICKING AGAINST THE PRICKS’
Given this ‘real world’ outcome, further crass sabotage operations (‘kicking against the pricks’) sponsored by the White House – notwithstanding the ever more conspicuously desperate plight of the US States and economy – have been countered with universal disgust and contempt, since we last reported. On 14th July, the Government tried to ‘tap into the money’, a criminal operation that was ‘stopped by the Swiss’ enforcement operatives [see earlier reports], when comparing the US payment ‘screen’ with the screen in Basle.

It is reported to us that the US military, under Robert Gates – the former CIA Director of Central Intelligence, no less – is supposed now to be in charge of enforcing the releases. Yet given the recalcitrant attempt by the Government itself to interfere with the releases on 15th July, Gates’ effectiveness in this context, given his compromised position, appears to be typically ambivalent. Neveretheless he, too, has to comply.

On 15th July, we were advised that Chinese parties intervened and collapsed the release process, complaining that they were unhappy with the so-called ‘revised’ terms arising from the redefined payee list (see the line item payment referenced above) – a development requiring explanation.

PAYEE LIST REDEFINED TO INCLUDE A KEY ‘LINE ITEM PAYMENT’
Because what this means is that the ‘terms’ that had prevailed prior to the US delegation to London being given the appropriate dressing down and the redefined payee list, diverged from the terms required by the wronged British sovereign power – and furthermore that the Chinese parties in question were going along with this apparent intention to divert components of the release funds. So when the Chinese found out that the US delegation had been told in no uncertain terms that the ‘Rule of Law’ arrangements for the releases inherent in the just redefined payee list including the mentioned line item payment will prevail and that these proper arrangements are ‘set in stone’, they objected. The Chinese straddle both sides of the corrupted, criminal, feuding factions within the tawdry US Intelligence Power, you see.

LAST-MINUTE SCAMMING OPERATIONS BY THE CROOKS
What also emerged on 15th July was as follows:

• Two attempts to ‘release’ on 15th July were aborted when the ‘screens didn’t match’ due to the fact that the payee list had been redefined as required by the British sovereign power (and Basle) to include the specific line item payment. On at least the second occasion, it emerged that certain people were scheduled to be paid who should not be being paid, i.e. that the detailed payment arrangements in the United States had not yet been re-adjusted BACK to what the key sovereign power, the wronged power, requires. This, as explained above, is the pattern of payment that will prevail, incorporating the mentioned line item payment, and the Swiss enforcers reporting to Basle are ensuring that compliance with these requirements is absolute.

• George Bush Sr. is STILL skimming money ‘off the top’.

• Certain of Obama’s people knew that Bush Sr. was stealing and skimming money off the top of illicit trades exploiting the payout release funds, but withheld this information from the supposed President (i.e., are complicit). Count Rahm Emanuel in here.

• Criminal former Vice President Cheney is reported to us to have had his hand in the till as well, as usual. Ironically, since off-balance sheet monies will not be allowed, all this money that these criminal fools are still trying to steal, is going to be worth zero.

• Insistence on application of the ‘Rule of Law’ solution has revealed that these criminal parties had, as indicated above, long since ‘divided the cake’ up among themselves, despite still fighting over the slices, contrary to what was pre-agreed, required – and necessitated, in accordance with the World Court Writ of Execution probably handed to Obama in London on 1st April, as reported.

• Rearguard sabotage operations are being/have been run out of the Obama White House by the so-called ‘Political Action Committee’ (PAC) operation headed by Rahm Emanuel, who stole funds from the murdered Vincent Foster, who was believed to have been handling up to $500 billion. Emanuel, a treasonous Mossad (Irgun) operative, who ‘knows all about’ 9/11, is closely linked to the Clinton Crime Family component of the Syndicate, and was/is the go-between between Mossad, the Clintons and Bush Sr. Rahm Emanuel took the funds to Chicago where he became a partner with Wasserstein Perella and Company, the entity with which the former President of the World Bank, James Wolfensohn, was associated. Some time ago, two participants in the PAC were arrested for violations of national security (stealing state secrets).

EXCERPTS FROM A CRUCIAL AFFIDAVIT
In an Affidavit prepared and signed on 29th December 2008 by Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., notarised by Raemarie T. Kovaly, Notary Public, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and conveyed to the Editor of this service for onward forwarding, Mr Cottrell reported as follows [verbatim]:

… On September 12, 2008 between approximately 8:37 a.m. EST and 8:52 a.m. EST, Mr Dana V. Wilcox telephoned me and discussed the following items:

(a) That the above-mentioned items [referencing matters of global importance referenced earlier in the same Affidavit] combined with the current subprime/derivative débacle now requires a new “Private Funding Refunding Operation of the US Dollar” – without US Government funding;

(b) That the new refunding flow charts would resemble the flow charts [that] Delmarva Timber Trust, et al., had developed under Mr Wilcox and Mr Cottrell;

(c) That said flow chart system identified joint venture projects between Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. and Delmarva Timber Trust, et al., to create tax incentives and full tax payment to the US Government, et al., as part of the refunding process, and fund numerous low-income housing, waste management, other infrastructure projects, and administration auditing teams for the projects;

(d) That these flow charts and processes were the actual basis of the “Wanta Plan” activities, as presented to Mr Christopher Story, FRSA, by Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., March 15 and 16, 2006;

(e) That Mr Wilcox agreed that upon receipt of the G-7 Refunding Funds to Pennsylvanian Investments, Inc. Securities Account at Morgan Stanley NYC, per the “Wanta/G-7 Plan”, he would act as ”Consultant at Least” for Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. and Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.;

(f) That the people identified with the [then] proposed Obama Economic Team – i.e., Dr Ben Bernanke, Mr Robert Rubin, Mr Timothy Geithner, Mr Lawrence Summers, Mr Paul Volcker, and specifically Mr Rahm Emanuel (Wasserstein Perella & Co.) – may have been tainted, by the actions of previous Presidential Administrations since 1981, and, therefore, may require ”safeguards” that ensure the demise or that hinder the effectiveness of the “Private Funding Refunding Operation of the US Dollar”.

(g) That Mr Wilcox and Mr Cottrell believe the release of the aforementioned funds would demand a transparent Presidency and a country operating under the Rule of Law. Only a proper privately funded refunding with third party auditing – not the President’s Cabinet as the auditing party – will allow the US Dollar to regain its capitalization value and renew the world’s international trading markets with full disclosure and transparent regulation’. (5).

Source: Notarised Affidavit and statement of facts plus 43 pages of supporting documentation dated 29th December 2008 submitted by Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., 1157 West Street, Erie, PA 16502 to Christopher Story FRSA, Edward Harle Limited, dated 29th December 2008, for onward transmittal to sovereign authority.

Notes:

(1) Extracts from a timeline analysis of the background to the Criminal Finance Crisis associated with the Editor’s personal involvement: Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 3 & 4, pages 3-25: July 2009:

• 10 September 2001: The Editor’s fourth daughter, having travelled round the world and wound up in New York City, decides not to visit the Twin Towers in downtown New York with a friend early the following morning. Instead they take the Staten Island Ferry, from which she takes pictures of Manhattan, including the last known photographs of the Twin Towers before the abomination.

• 11 September 2001: The deliberate blowing up, with inside US Government connivance and foreign participation, of the Twin Towers on the precise 30th anniversary of the commencement of building work, and on the birthday of Feliks Djerzhinski, head of Lenin’s Cheka, shocks the world.

In the course of this ‘Reichstag Fire’ abomination, 658 staff at the offices of the broker Cantor Fitzgerald perish, along with a huge portfolio of trading contracts, while a large volume of gold is stolen from underground storage facilities owned by Bank of Nova Scotia. The Editor is physically unable to work creatively for three weeks after the shock of this abomination.

• 11-18 September 2001: Frantic efforts are made to evacuate our youngest daughter from New York City. Eventually, she travels by train to Boston, and manages to catch a liner to Southampton. Meanwhile our New York apartment is covered in a layer of grey filth. Eventually the carpet has to be discarded, and the place completely repainted as the walls and ceiling are filthy as well.

• Late October 2001: The Editor attends our New York office in Midtown Manhattan and notices an unpleasant smell. This smell pervades everything and it becomes fully clear that it is the smell of decaying flesh – the same stench that troops have reported over the centuries from battlefields. The stench is accompanied by the film of grey material, which blankets the office, requiring hours of deep cleaning. The stench remains throughout the Editor’s visit. People in the Midtown New York street seem accustomed to it, but the Editor can recall the smell to this day.

• February 2002: The Editor attends at the New York office and finds that the stench of rotting flesh has not gone away, although now it seems to depend on the direction of the wind. But it is still very noticeable and all-pervading.

• June 2002: The Editor is invited to a peculiar conference event in Washington DC convened by www.unansweredquestions.org. Briefed beforehand on this outfit, the Editor discovers that it is a controlled operation seeking to influence and manage the responses and behaviour of the 9/11 bereaved families of the murdered occupants of the Twin Towers. At this meeting, an operative dressed in bright red circulates with 30 portfolios containing inter alia photocopies of Federal Reserve print-outs showing colossal sums of money being remitted to various parties, including the then President of the United States, George Bush Sr., in 1992.

The annotator/auditor has written on the relevant sheet that receipt of emoluments by holders of office under the United States is illegal, and pointing out that George Bush Sr. has been receiving corrupt payments while serving as the President of the United States. The agent distributed these folders to 30 recipients, but not to the Editor, who asked for a set of the documents later, when a group of us met for drinks in the bar of the International Press Club, where the event was held. It later transpires that the folders were actually handed to intelligence community operatives, with the single exception of a set that was handed to a representative of Vanity Fair (which never used the material). The Agency therefore assumed that the information had been successfully clawed back and could therefore ‘do no harm’ (to the CIA).

• July 2002: The Editor contacts the agent and asks for a set of the documents (called the ‘FINS’) to be sent to him in London. These duly arrive about a week later. The Editor tsubsequently reviews the printouts, which turn out to be from a Federal Reserve Board master computer and show that the payments were remitted under the authority of Dr Alan Greenspan. Uncertain at first whether the documents were genuine or not, the Editor then pursues various lines of enquiry and continues with his normal workload.

• December 2002: The Editor concludes that the documents are genuine and resolves to expose them via our financial journal International Currency Review. The resulting issue, called our ‘first take’, is then prepared.

• March 2003: We publish International Currency Review, Volume 28, Number 4, which contains early analyses of these documents and accompanying materials, together with information about the ‘Black’ background of George H. W. Bush Sr. and assessments of the significance of the Federal Reserve print-outs, which carry indications on the top of the sheets to the effect that they were faxed originally by Lt. Delmart Mark Vreeland, whom we establish to be an ONI (Office of Naval Intelligence) operative.

• 19 March 2003: George W. Bush Jr. launches the illegal assault on Iraq and is caught on the White House video system punching his fists in the air and exclaiming ‘Feels good, feels good’. From now until early May, no one pays attention to anything at all beyond the war in Iraq.

At the outset, US Special Forces attack the Central Bank of Iraq and steal its gold, currency, paper assets and probably currency printing plates. The Special Forces engaged in this operation are then systematically liquidated, as uniquely reported by our services.

• Note: Our report on the attack on the Central Bank of Iraq, including the deliberate subsequent mass murder of the Special Forces operatives who carried out the attack, is being republished in International Currency Review, Volume 34, Numbers 3 & 4: pages F-37 to F-61 [July 2009].

It originally appeared in Volume 29, #1, on pages 33-58 [Summer 2003]. This analysis is apparently considered to be the classic report on the subject.

The assault on the Central Bank of Iraq was one of the key objectives, and enabled the White House to control a supposedly ‘independent’ financial institution, which could then be used as a key counterparty for exotic secret, and illicit, ‘Black’ financing purposes. When Mrs Hillary Clinton, a CIA operative, appeared in Baghdad in May 2009 to access the stolen Katrina funds which had been stashed in the Central Bank of Iraq, she was met by a Gold Badge who metaphorically placed his hand on her shoulder and told her she had been caught in flagrante trying to move the stolen Katrina funds. He also informed her that the funds had long since been retrieved. This episode reminds us how stupid these US financial operatives are: all such movements of funds are monitored and traced 24/7 using derivatives of the ‘see-through’ PROMIS software.

• Early May 2003: The Editor receives an unexpected phone call from ONI operative Lt. Delmart Mark Vreeland who, it later turns out, is ‘on the run’ and based in Yukon. Vreeland has somehow obtained a copy of International Currency Review, Volume 28, #4 (probably sent to him in Yukon by Gwendolyn Waymark: see below) and states that it is important that ‘we should meet’.

The Editor rashly agrees.

• Mid-May 2003: It is agreed that we will meet at McDonalds in the below-ground station area at Long Island Railroad station adjacent to Penn Station, New York. Vreeland asks the Editor to keep in touch throughout his journey and starts by asking him to make contact from Heathrow Airport. When contact is made, he asks the Editor to wire funds to him via Western Union from the airport, thus establishing a pattern of scamming behaviour that continues throughout the encounter, so that on the Editor’s return to London, he found that his Visa card had been scammed of £1,600.

On arrival in New York, the Editor is subjected to the usual operative technique of changing the venue, and is asked to take the next train to Niagara Falls, Canada, which he does. On arrival there, the Editor checks into a hotel and establishes that Vreeland is en route via Greyhound Bus from Yukon through Vancouver to Toronto and is approaching Toronto.

At a given moment Vreeland phones to say that the Editor should meet him in a shooting alley on Clifton Hill, the ghastly spectacle laid on for mindless visitors from the United States. Since the Editor knows what Vreeland looks like, he soon finds him in this location. Other details of this encounter can wait for the comprehensive exposé that is planned.

• It transpires that one of the sources of the FINS is indeed Vreeland himself, who, though an MK-ULTRA victim (split personality) and subject to necessary medication in order for the permanently warring ‘alters’ of his contrived multiple personality syndrome to remain under control, is lucid and extremely well informed and intelligent when examining the issue of our journal in some detail and explaining more about the geopolitical context. Thus Vreeland correctly reveals to the Editor that most of the world’s most serious problems can be attributed to George H. W. Bush Sr. who runs the German operation within the CIA and has the whole of the US Government in his grasp.

Vreeland, who predicted the 9/11 attacks from a Canadian jail cell in August 2001, also reveals that he had been sent to Moscow in December 2000 where he had managed to insert a Sony Playstation printed circuit inside a military installation, removing the circuit integrated inside the equipment.

He also related how his ‘partner’, the Canadian operative Marc Bastien, had been murdered after consuming a spiked drink in a Moscow bar, and that he (Vreeland) had couriered three diplomatic bags from Moscow to Toronto. (Obviously Vreeland may have been a suspect in this murder).

His story was that as he expected he would be ‘set up’, he had three dummy diplomatic bags, and when he was met at Toronto Airport by Russians, he handed them the empty bags and kept the US diplomatic bags, one of which he later opened (which is treason).

It remains unclear to us whether the Federal Reserve printouts were obtained from the opened diplomatic bag or from another source. Vreeland explains the role of Leo/Lee Wanta, an operative who, with his Chinese ‘partner’, Howie Kwong Kok, was said to have been extensively involved in Financial Warfare operations against the Soviet Union in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

Vreeland then threatened the Editor with death while the Editor was travelling back to New York from Niagara Falls, having ordered him to get off the train and to return to Canada, which the Editor refused to do (‘bait and switch’).

• Note: Following meetings and contact with a Pentagon-linked operative arranged by Gordon Thomas, this operative informed the Editor in March 2005 that ‘Vreeland is incarcerated for a very long time in solitary confinement, his case is closed, and he is no danger to you now’.

• May 2003: On returning to New York from Niagara Falls, the Editor finds a voicemail on his New York answerphone, from a Bush-linked operative, Gwendolyn Waymark. The message contains the warning: ‘None of this must ever come out, you understand’.

When an investigative journalist is addressed like that, the inevitable response is that a cover-up operation is in play and that, accordingly, further investigations are mandatory. By now the Editor suspected that the ‘national security’ cover was being used to mask immense corruption, stealing and exploitation of funds by corrupt elements within the US Government structures, and that he would accordingly do the opposite of what Waymark requested.

• July 2003: The Editor establishes the address of Wanta and travels by car to visit him, but there is no one at home due to the summer vacation period.

• May 2004: The Editor visits Leo Wanta out of the blue and is welcomed into the home, which belongs to a member of his family. Wanta is out of jail, to which he was consigned ostensibly for non-payment of $14,129 of Wisconsin State tax which he had in fact paid twice (in May and June 1992) as extensively described in our reports. The detail of the Wanta case will not be repeated here: it is all in the public domain, published in International Currency Review and on our website; and none of it has been challenged by any authority, although the Editor, who is now in possession of improved information, is now in a better position to amend any earlier misunderstandings which were due to inadequate data.

Very shortly after 9/11 (on 21st September 2001), Wanta is let out of jail and placed on probation, restricted to the State of Wisconsin. The fact that he was let out of jail within days of 9/11 is a relevant fact of crucial significance. Wanta had accumulated a vast number of offshore Executive Order 12333 US intelligence accounts holding colossal sums in cash, collateral and other assets, plus lock boxes containing diamonds and other items, ostensibly arising from the ransacking of the Soviet Union. However that was a convenient partial ‘cover story’.

• November 2004: The Editor is urged by Gordon Thomas, a veteran British journalist ‘with contacts within MI6’, to get in touch with the Pentagon-linked operative. The Editor refuses.

After further urging and statements by Thomas to the effect that ‘he has been vetted by MI6’, the Editor relents and an appointment is made for the Editor to contact the agent in the fishing tackle section of a sports store on Fifth Avenue, New York City. As in a tradecraft movie, the Editor finds this man, complete with spook’s raincoat, ostensibly examining fishing rods at the back end of the store. This agent takes the Editor to the Algonquin Hotel and plies him with Coca Cola, while very evidently recording everything that the Editor says. He asks questions concerning Vreeland, and the Editor informs him that Vreeland is a multiple personality disorder MK-ULTRA Illuminati victim trained to respond to trigger phrases (i.e. there would be a sequence which would trigger his role as an assassin). The agent later uses the Editor to extract from him detailed information about the two Soviet ships that left the Iraqi port of Umm Qasr in February 2003, carrying most physical traces of weapons of mass destruction manufacture and assembly.

• The agent sent repeated email requests for more information on this subject, which the Editor compiled from his own open sources and from the Soviet military Intelligence (GRU) website!

• December 2004: During a visit by the Editor to Gordon Thomas in Bath, Thomas reveals that MI6 has disseminated lies about the Editor to the gullible British press (a matter extensively reviewed by us elsewhere). Specifically, it has been suggested to the British media that the Editor had been involved in the aborted Equatorial Guinea venture with Mark Thatcher, a fanciful piece of make-believe – whereas of course the Editor has done nothing else at all since 1970 but work 24/7 on our publications. Gordon Thomas indicates that ‘with a new Bush Administration in power, Washington has asked MI6 what they intend to do about Mr Story’ (i.e., would they please take steps to bring this confounded investigative journalist under control, as he is causing us a great deal of trouble: by which was meant that he is thought likely to expose our serial criminality. How right they were).

• March 2005: After a meeting in Washington, DC, with the Pentagon-linked agent, who, having asked for copies of our publications which he said he would pay for but never did, and who had seemed most annoyed when the Editor showed him the further issues of the journal containing detailed elaborations of this financial research, the Pentagon agent telephoned the Editor in London and asked him questions about ‘our arrangements with Bernie Ecclestone in Monaco’ about which the Editor knew nothing whatsoever.

After listening to this for several minutes, the Editor said: ‘I have no idea what you are talking about. You had better go back to your source’. The agent was silent for some time and then said: ‘That is worrying in view of where this comes from’ (i.e. MI6). When the Editor had ‘joined up the dots’, he telephoned Gordon Thomas and in an extended conversation, which has since been published, he asked him why MI6 thought they could disseminate craven lies and get away with it. To this, Thomas uttered his notorious response: ‘It doesn’t matter that it’s not true. All that matters is that it’s out there’. He then explained… ‘They probably think you’re dangerous because you’ve got the documents and you control your own publications and no-one can tell you what to do’.

• Dangerous TO WHOM? Again, as with the Waymark intervention, this represented a clear signal that the investigations must continue, come what may.

• March 2005: At Wanta’s suggestion, the Editor visits Richmond, VA, to meet the Düsseldorf-born Steven Goodwin, one of Wanta’s (CIA) Attorneys. (Wanta, by the way, always answers the phone in German: ‘Guten Tag’). The Editor buys Goodwin a dinner, during which Goodwin explains that he has negotiated an agreement with the Wisconsin State Department of Corrections for Wanta’s probation to be shortened on payment of a certain sum of money by way of ‘Restitution’.

The amount in question is over $30,000 [see detailed background: www.worldreports.org: Archive: 6th August 2007]. In retrospect it was clear that Mr Goodwin was suggesting subliminally that the Editor should come up with the funds in question. The amount would consist of a third (completely irregular as the Editor later discovered) payment of the original $14,129 plus interest, plus fees.

• April 2005: The Editor decides, after a great deal of thought, to proceed with payment of the $35,000 and identifies private funds obtained from a successful sale of our private central London property. Goodwin is asked to prepare the necessary loan documents.

• May 2005: The Editor visits Wanta again and spends longer in his Wisconsin location, updating his understanding of Wanta’s rôle as custodian of the innumerable offshore bank accounts linked to his Financial Warfare operations against the USSR in conjunction with Howie Kwong Kok.

However these accounts are now believed to represent depositories of Fraudulent Finance operations conducted on behalf of the Bush Crime Syndicate. The loan documents that Goodwin should have sent never materialised, until the Editor’s final day in New York, when they suddenly appear (after ostensibly having been sent no less than three times previously).

• 10 June 2005: The Editor visits Wanta in Wisconsin and Wanta sticks the loan documents on the table essentially with the command: ‘Sign here’. Taken aback, the Editor wonders whether to leave immediately without signing, but decides instead to sign, having ‘come this far’. The Editor then buys Wanta lunch and dinner.

• June-July 2005: The Editor deliberately delays to see whether this would cause Wanta problems, and sure enough he is badgered on the phone by Wanta on several occasions. Finally the Editor sends a bank draft for $35,000 to Goodwin with instructions on what he is to do with the funds, which have been provided on a loan basis at 7.0% for two years, repayable in full with interest on 11th June 2007. Goodwin then drags his feet and initially resists the Editor’s sharp request that he travel to Wisconsin to obtain the necessary receipt from the Department of Corrections.

Finally, after being ordered up to Wisconsin by the Editor, he goes there, and obtains a receipt (demanded by the Editor) dated 21st July 2005 plus a computer print-out the following day stating that no further funds are owed.

• July-November 2005: Notwithstanding that the payments have been made, Wanta’s probation is not shortened as was agreed by Goodwin with the Department of Corrections, until 14th November 2005 (following a delay of four months), when a formal document signed by a Mr Matthew J. Frank, Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections, emerges confirming that Wanta has been given an unconditional discharge (purchased with the Editor’s loan funds).

This shortened his probation by five years and two weeks. Goodwin should then arguably have obtained a dispensation from the Court deleting Wanta’s status as a felon which he did not do.

[The Editor wrote to Wisconsin Judge James Martin on 17th October 2007 (see website Archive report dated 27th October 2007) under ‘Misprision of Felony’ drawing his attention to the extreme proven irregularities perpetrated by the Wisconsin Department of Corrections summarised in the website report dated 6th August 2007: see Archive]

• December 2005: Dr Alan Greenspan and the US Treasury Secretary, John Snow, travel to China where they ostensibly enter into negotiations with Chinese parties including probably Howie Kwong Kok concerning the release of ‘Wanta funds’.

• 15-16 March 2006: The Editor visits Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., in Erie, Pennsylvania, arriving in the middle of the night amid a snowstorm. No taxis were available at the old Amtrak station, and the Editor walked several miles in the pitch dark without the slightest idea of where he was.

Eventually a cab crammed full of people stopped at some traffic lights. The Editor hailed the full taxi, and the driver said he would return in 40 minutes. At the subsequent meetings, Michael Cottrell outlined the Private Sector Refunding Programme for the US Dollar which the Editor described in outline in the forgoing Affidavit dated 29th December 2009.

• 18 March 2006: Visiting Goodwin at Richmond for a second time, the Editor is party to a special conference call to Coutts Bank, London, involving Goodwin, the Editor, Wanta, and Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., who was then Treasurer and Executive Vice President of Wanta’s AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., registered in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Asking for Mrs Burgess, whom the Editor had met at Coutts earlier, Goodwin was put through to a Mr Robertson who said that Coutts did not have a relationship with Mr Wanta, which contradicted information in our possession.

The purpose of the telephone call had been to arrange for the Editor, equipped with a very limited (information only) Power of Attorney, to visit Coutts Bank with Goodwin in early April 2006 to inspect assets held by specific ‘Wanta’ corporations at Coutts and to report accordingly. Robertson denied that the bank had any banking relationship with Wanta and the call, which was listened to by many agencies, was terminated, after the Editor had stated that he was engaged in research into stolen funds for publication in our journal International Currency Review.

• Late April 2006: Equipped with the limited Power of Attorney, furnished by Goodwin on Wanta’s instructions, the Editor visited Lloyds Bank, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, to meet the Manager in order to be informed about specific accounts ‘owned’ by Wanta, so as to report back.

The manager went away and returned with the information that the accounts had been shifted into the PERSONAL name of Jan Morton Heger, one of Wanta’s ‘former’ CIA Attorneys.

• Late April 2006: Wanta, now free to travel outside Wisconsin thanks to the Edsitor’s loan money, suddenly travelled to California where he was briefed by CIA operatives. When he returned, the previous intention of collecting all the assets for repatriation to the United States appeared to have been abandoned and Wanta spoke instead of $4.5 trillion that was to be brought over from China, which was ostensibly to represent his compensation for ‘wrongful imprisonment’ and for what he had done in executing Financial Warfare instructions issued by Reagan directly to him.

• May 2006: The $4.5 trillion was duly delivered in good faith by People’s Bank of China, into the custody of Bank of America, Richmond, VA. It was ostensibly supposed to be paid over to Wanta and/or his corporation in June 2006, which came and went with no such payment.

• June 2006: John Snow is suddenly replaced by the former CEO of Goldman Sachs, Henry M. Paulson Jr., who has the $4.5 trillion transferred to a Goldman Sachs account with Citibank and, according to our best information and belief, later places the $4.5 trillion into contract for trading purposes for one year, behind Wanta’s back. As Treasury Secretary, he nevertheless retains sole signatory control over the $4.5 trillion, which on the face of it represents a grotesque abuse of power and conflict of interest – a point that we subsequently emphasise in our web reports. Paulson should have been impeached for this transgression.

• July 2006: The official US disinformation machine gets into full gear, with its first lie focused on ‘expectations’ that the $4.5 trillion would be paid on 31st July, which does not happen.

At this stage, the Editor’s website platform starts to be used by Leo Wanta to run a campaign to ‘embarrass’ the US authorities into paying over Wanta’s $4.5 trillion. Details of this de facto campaign are omitted here, as they are decisively on the record on our website Archive and in successive issues of International Currency Review.

• 02 September 2006: The Editor publishes a macroeconomic assessment outlining the benefits which will follow payment and the use of the ‘Wanta’ funds for Refunding purposes, which is what has been agreed by the G-7 Group of financial powers [see Note (5) below]. Moreover HM the Queen was reported to have told the G-7 participants in June 2006 that the $ Refunding had to proceed ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’ – revealing that Buckingham Palace has access to the very best macroeconomic advice in the world.

The Editor’s report also predicts the consequences of not implementing ‘The G-7-Approved Refunding Plan’. The predictions contained in that report pre-dated macroeconomic reports by self-appointed ‘gurus’ who now say that they were the first to predict what has happened accurately.

• September 2006 to March 2007: The de facto website report ‘campaign’ achieves worldwide fame and is magnified when French intelligence disseminate the reports to innumerable outlets, giving us a per-report readership estimated at one stage as high as nearly 50 million.

• December 2006: We report that Henry M. Paulson, US Treasury Secretary, is arrested in Germany. This report, which we knew to be accurate, was laughed to scorn by observers for a few days until knowledgeable sources whispered in the background that it was accurate. Mr Paulson was later exfiltrated from German custody aboard a British plane and dumped at the Washington Cathedral for the prolonged memorial service for President Ford, in early January 2007.

• 29-30 March 2007: Without any warning, the British banking system closes down. The Editor becomes aware of this when attempting to refill a mobile telephone pay-as-you-go arrangement using a VISA card. Over the next few weeks it transpires that gold assets belonging to the British monarchy have been hijacked or stolen or diverted while the British banking system was closed down to the outside world and to the general public. The heist was perpetrated by insiders within the Bank of England and elsewhere, working with corrupt US counterparts. In due course, the Editor publishes this information on the website.

• April 2007: The Editor publishes a warning that information obtained from Vreeland in October 2004 when he warned a contact of the Editor for the Editor’s information that an atrocity was intended in the Twin Cities of Minneapolis-St Paul, Minnesota, could refer to the Republican National Convention planned to start in the Twin Cities on 1st September 2008.

The Editor is later informed that an atrocity focused on the Twin Cities may have been aborted as a consequence (Note: The ‘Dark Forces’ have a hang-up about twins: Twin Towers, Twin Cities. 1st September 2008 also devolves kabbalistically to 9/11, which would have been a relevant factor as these people are hooked by such esoteric Babylonian-originated numerology). The Editor is also separately informed much later that our website forced another Bush II Administration ‘inside job’ atrocity – a planned nuclear explosion on American soil – to be aborted.

• 15 May 2007: The Editor informs a previously cooperative US contact of what he knows about the stealing of The Queen’s gold. The contact, lacking information, says: ‘I find that hard to believe’. The Editor says: ‘If you don’t believe what I say then don’t bother to contact me again’, and severs the contact. This came as a shock to the handling ‘structures’, which then took ‘special measures’ to have the agent removed from the scene. This was an unfortunate and unintended consequence of the ongoing US deceptions.

• 19-20 June 2007: The Bank of England sends $6.2 trillion of sovereign LOAN funds to Bank of New York Mellon for use to fund the Dollar Refunding Program after it has become apparent that the $4.5 trillion sent over by the People’s Bank of China in May 2006 ostensibly to finance Leo Wanta’s Settlement and the ‘Wanta Plan’ Refinancing operation, has been hijacked and diverted/stolen for illicit trading purposes to finance the US Intelligence Power’s ‘Black’ finance budget, to keep the criminal banking enterprises afloat, and for official and intermediary self-enrichment purposes. Instead of acting as a pass-through institution, BoNY Mellon hijacks the funds, which are then exploited ruthlessly until mid-September 2008.

Source: Excerpted from Economic Intelligence Review, Volume 12, Numbers 3 & 4: July 2009. The actual complete timeline is much more extensive than is cited here.

(2) Banks identified by the Editor of this service from open domain documents we retain, as holding ‘Wanta’ (‘Bush Syndicate’) illicit funds (which, when ‘accepted’ by US authority, are ‘laundered via the sovereign’ and thereby legitimised):

AB Invest [Avenue Banque]
ABN-AMRO Bank N.V., Amsterdam,
Agape Holdings, Ltd, Barbados
Agricultural Bank of China
Algemene Spaar-en Lufrentenkas
Algemene Spaar-en Lufrentenkas/ASLK Bank
Altalanos Eriekforgalmi Bank Rt (AEB RT)
Amsouth Bank, N.A
Amur Commercial Bank, Moscow
Anglo Manx Bank Limited
Arab Jordan Investment Bank
Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Limited, Melbourne
Bacob Savings Bank, Borgerhout, Belgium
Banca di Roma, Rome
Banca Nazionale del Lavoro
Banco Ambrosiano Veneto
Banco Espanol de Credito, S.A., Madrid
Banco Espirito Santo e Comerciale de Lisboa, Lisbon
Banco Exterior de Espana, Madrid
Banco Hispano Americano
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas
Bank ‘UKRAINA’, Kiev, Ukraine
Bank Bruxelles Lambert
Bank Crozier Limited, Grenada [closed down, money stolen*]
Bank Dumesnil, Geneva
Bank for Foreign Economic Affairs of the USSR, Moscow
Bank of America
Bank of America International, New York
Bank of America, Milan
Bank of America, Newport Beach, CA
Bank of America, Vienna, Austria
Bank of China
Bank of New York, New York
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd, Tokyo
Bank Union de Crédit
Bankers Trust GmbH, Frankfurt
Banque Nationale de Paris
Banque Paribas (Luxembourg) S.A
Banque SCS ALLIANCE Geneva
Banque Suisse de Crédit et de Dépôts, Zürich
Barclays Bank, Hanover Square, London
CBI-TDB Union Bancaire Privée, Geneva
Chase Manhattan Bank N.A., London,
Chase Manhattan Bank, Milan
Chase Manhattan Bank, New York
Chase Manhattan Bank, Vienna
Chemical Bank of New York
Citibank – Frankfurt
Citibank – Geneva
Citibank – Los Angeles
Citibank – Milan
Citibank – New York
Citibank – Singapore
Citibank – Tokyo
Citibank – Vienna, Austria
Citibank, N.A., Philippines
Citicorp/Citibank
Citicorp/Citibank, London, Painewebber, Inc
Clydesdale Bank Plc
Commercial Bank ‘Moldova-Agroindbank’, S.A., Kishinev
Coutts Bank (Switzerland) Ltd
Coutts Bank, London
Crédit Lynonnais Bank Nederland NV, Amsterdam
Crédit Suisse Bank
Crédit Suisse Bank, Geneva
Crédit Suisse Bank, Lausanne
Crédit Suisse First Boston, Zürich
Credobank (Commercial Bank)
DBS Bank/Development Bank of Singapore: This bank was closed down by the authorities
and $70 billion was stolen in the process. The existing institution is a ‘phoenix’.
Dean Witter Reynolds
Den Norske Bank AS, Oslo
Deutsche Bank, Düsseldorf
Dresdner Bank, Frankfurt
Faroe Investments
FIDENAS AG, Zürich, Switzerland
Générale de Banque
Gosbank, USSR
Handels Bank AG, Zürich
Handelsbank Natwest, Zürich
Hansabank, Talinn, Estonia
Joint Stock Bank ‘Kazkommertsbank’, Almaty
Jugobanka D.D
Lloyds Bank Plc
Lloyds Bank Plc, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire
[Funds placed in the personal name of his former Attorney Jan Morton Heger]
Manufacturers Hanover Corporation/Mantrust
Marshall and Ilsley Bank
Merita Bank, Helsinki
Merrill Lynch Inc
Midland Bank Plc, London
Morgan Guaranty & Trust Bank, New York
Morgan Stanley and Co, New York
Morgan Stanley Asia Ltd, Hong Kong
Moscow Cooperative Bank ‘Partner’ Bank
Moscow Narodny Bank Ltd, Singapore
Mosstrolbank, AmeriTrust Corporation Inc.
National Bank for Foreign Economic Activity of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent,
National Westminster Bank
National Westminster Bank of New Jersey
National Westminster Bank Plc., Herne Bay, Kent
Nomura Singapore Limited
Nordbanken AB, Stockholm
Northern Trust International Banking Corporation
Norwest Bank, N.A
Ost-West Handelsbank, Frankfurt
Painewebber, Inc
Paribas (Suisse) S.A., Geneva
Philadelphia International Bank
Prudential Securities, New York
Raffeisen Zentralbank Osterreich, Vienna
Raffeisenbank Appenzell
Rafffeisen Zentralbank Osterreich AG [RBZ], Singapore
Relvnesheconombank, Minsk
Rigas Komerc Banka, Riga, Latvia
Royal Bank of Scotland Plc
Royal Trust Bank
Sanwa Bank Limited
Sanwa Bank Lt, Düsseldorf
Schweizerische Bankgesellshaft /Union Bank of Switzerland
Security Pacific Asia Bank, Ltd
Shearson Lehman Hutton Inc., Denver
Société Générale, Paris
Société Générale, Riga, Latvia
Southwest Securities, Inc
Standard Chartered Bank, Philippines
State Bank for Foreign Economic Affairs for Turkmenistan
Status-Credit Bank, Moscow
Swiss Banking Corporation
Swiss Volksbank, Zürich
Texas Commerce Bank, Dallas
Toronto Dominion Bank
Unibank A.S., Copenhagen
Union Bank of Switzerland, Geneva
Union Bank of Switzerland, Zürich
Vilniaus Bank AS, AB, Vilnius, Lithuania
Volksbank, Bonn, Germany
Volksbank, Offerdingen, Germany
Westdeutsche Landesbank, Düsseldorf, Germany
Zentralsparkasse und Kommerzialbank, Vienna.

* ONI operative Vreeland informed the Editor that he was among four agents who flew down to Grenada to investigate Bank Crozier after a huge theft from the bank was reported in the late 1990s. The theft was perpetrated by CIA operative Hillary Clinton, now the US Secretary of State. Vreeland reported that when the agents entered the bank, they established that the bank’s video system, which kept a visual record of everyone entering the premises, was blank during the period when Mrs Clinton attended at the institution. She reportedly stole a colossal sum of money.

We have separately reported that when Mrs Clinton visited Baghdad in May 2009, ostensibly to hold a ‘town meeting’, but in fact to access the Katrina funds stolen inter alia by the Clintons and hidden at the Central Bank of Iraq (which has been under direct ‘White House control’ since the invasion), she was greeted by a US Gold Badge who metaphorically placed a heavy hand on her shoulder and said: ‘You’ve been caught in flagrante, Mrs Clinton. And furthermore, the stolen Katrina funds have been retrieved’. It is believed that on this occasion, the bank’s video system was functioning perfectly normally.

• Unsurprisingly, Mrs Clinton was reported on 15th July to be suffering from a ‘broken elbow’. Normally gangster enforcement operatives briefed to maim but not to kill, would go for the knee-caps. But we imagine that a broken elbow would be agony too.

Source: International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 1 & 2, pages 168-171 and pages 331-332 [Third Quarter 2007]: website Archive reports: 30 December 2006 and 11 June 2007. Very self-evidently, some of these institutions have long since been absorbed into other institutions, have been rebranded, or have otherwise become successor organisations. Comprehensive details and facsimiles of the ACTUAL TRANSACTIONS, BANK ACCOUNTS AND COORDINATES, were published in International Currency Review, Volume 31, 3/4 [December 2006].

(3) Although there are many thousands of CIA proprietary US Government intelligence corporations, those with which Wanta was connected include:

Amberhaven Limited, Switzerland.
AmeriChina Global Management Group Ltd., US.
AmeriChina-Philippines Corporation, Philippines.
AmeriTrust (Suisse) S.A., Switzerland.
AmeriTrust Corporation, Canada.
AmeriTrust Corporation, Inc., United States.
Aneko Credit Pte Limited, Singapore.
Asian-Europa Development Limited, Singapore.
Cataract, Inc., United States.
Dagin Investment Corporation*.
Forum Construction S.A.*.
Galloping Ghost Ltd.*
Glister Mount Limited, Hong Kong.
Leo E. Wanta and Associates, Inc., United States.
Marvelous Investments Limited, British Virgin Islands.
Marvelous Investments Limited, United States.
MiApollo Investments Limited, Hong Kong.
MiApollo Productions Inc, United States.
Mitre Corporation, Inc.*, United States [MIT].
New Republic Air (Bahamas) Limited, Bahamas.
New Republic/USA Financial Group, Ltd., G.mbH, Vienna.
Patriarch Corporation, Malaysia.
Quarterhouse, Ltd., United States.
Ramo Manufacturing Co., Inc., United States.
Regency Catering, Inc., United States.
RUSS, Russian Federation
Tockton Enterprises, Inc.*.
Trans-Asia Global Resources, Singapore.
Vendor Leasing Services, Inc., United States.
White Cloud Petroleum Corporation, Delaware, US.

* Country of incorporation uncertain.

These CIA/DIA corporations conduct(ed) business, earned substantial profits, received assets, maintained bank accounts, duly filed ‘economic reports’ with the General Accounting Office (GAO), borrowed money, paid back loans, and operated ‘day-to-day businesses’.

Our usage of the past tense here merely reflects the documents in our possession from which these observations were derived, and does not preclude the fact that most of these corporations (and thousands of others) remain operative, even though trillions of dollars lodged therein have been diverted.

In the spring of 1992 an audit of CIA corporations’ assets and activities was carried out by the Hong Kong office of Price Waterhouse. The upshot was that the auditor certified that the total value of currencies, gold, precious gems and other assets THEN held by these and certain other (unnamed) Title 18, Section 6 USG companies amounted to $864,000,000,000. Source: International Currency review, Volume 31, Numbers 3 & 4, pages 190-191 [Fourth Quarter 2006].

(4) See: Soviet Analyst, Volume 29, Number 7, May 2005, page 8.

((5) Excerpts from our prediction of what would happen if the Refunding Programme (previously labelled by us ‘The Wanta Plan’) were not to be implemented expeditiously: published first on 2nd September 2006 and again on 3rd-4th December 2006 [see this website’s Archive for those dates]. Source: International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 1 & 2, pages 299-302 [Third Quarter 2007]. For this presentation, the phrase ‘The Wanta Plan’ (which, like ‘Wantagate’, we invented) is replaced by ‘The G-7-Approved Refunding Plan’.

THE GRIM CONSEQUENCES OF ABORTING THE WANTA PLAN:

Not implementing The G-7-Approved Refunding Plan will have the consequences indicated below, among many others. The primary assumption underlying what follows is that a wholly irrational and by now shambolic, terminal free-for-all has developed in which the myriad competing parties seek their own advantage, without regard for the broader consequences – or if they have any regard for them, place them on one side while they cynically pursue their own interests first.

• To begin with, the entire mass of the international financial community knows about this crisis – and that the American authorities have lied, double-crossed and deceived from the outset, that the Full Faith and Credit of the United States and the Rule of Law in America have collapsed, and that Bush II Administration officials are behaving like a bunch of arrogant Chicago gangsters who believe that because the intimidated ‘mainstream‘ media have failed to pick this story up, they are protected from the consequences of their serial criminality and duplicity.

• The consequences of blocking The G-7-Approved Refunding Plan itemised below are NOT dependent, as the White House may have presumed, upon the continued suppression of this crisis by the controlled US and UK ‘mainstream‘ media. On the contrary, the ‘mainstream‘ media, which is being constantly updated on the crisis, is liable to be caught off-balance by the devastating global consequences of the Bush II White House continuing to block this beneficial Settlements. Put another way, ‘they won‘t know what has hit them‘, and they will have to scramble to catch up.

• Institutions in the United States and abroad teetering on the brink of insolvency due to the severe financial knock-on effects of the US authorities‘ duplicity in failing to implement their undertakings and obligations concerning The G-7-Approved Refunding Plan, will go to the wall.

• The Communist Chinese increase the volume of oil traded in currencies other than the US dollar, following reports from New Delhi and elsewhere (in late August 2006) that such transactions had already started. With the failure of scheduled payments by the American authorities, implying clearly that the US dollar payments system has ceased to function and cannot be relied upon, the
Chinese Communists decide that they have nothing to lose by switching from the US dollar for oil payments to other currencies.

• The US dollar collapses by 50% or more. Since other key currencies are now in greater demand, because they are needed for oil payments purposes, their massive appreciations reflecting the US dollar‘s steep devaluation are, if anything, exacerbated further, given this sudden new demand.

• Since many US imports, including of course oil, continue to be in demand domestically, US price inflation escalates sharply, followed by interest rates. Indeed interest rates chase inflation upwards.

• The US housing sector, already in implosion mode, shifts into free-fall, housing starts collapse, and large swathes of the US economy follow downwards into unknown territory.

• Unemployment rises steeply, placing added burdens on the welfare sector which have further cumulative adverse financial consequences.

• The steep devaluation of the US dollar boosts US exports over time, in due course bringing about sharp reductions and then the disappearance of the country‘s $1 trillion annual trade deficit. This process, however, is subject to the so-called J-curve effect, whereby the foreign trade deficit worsens sharply to begin with, given that essential imports in the pipeline cannot be cancelled and still have to be paid for with steeply devalued dollars. It is only when these overhang transactions have been unwound, which can take years, depending on the volume of forward import contracts placed, that the beneficial effects of the dollar‘s massive devaluation start
to rebalance the country‘s external accounts.

• The deficit on the current account takes longer to eliminate because the outstanding US debt continues to exist and has to be paid off with steeply devalued dollars when surpluses appear on the balance-of-payments, which again may take several years. The immediate impact of the steep devaluation is therefore greatly to exacerbate the US domestic recession or depression brought about by the other adverse knock-on effects mentioned.

• Within a short space of time, Western economies, in particular, find that their exports cannot compete, and their steep currency appreciations, while curbing inflation and probably delivering price deflation, leave exporting companies unable to compete, forced to lay off staff or to close down altogether because their overall operations have become loss-making or uneconomic.

There will be much blood on corporate boardroom carpets, and much wailing and gnashing of teeth.

• The US and all other stock markets experience a slump with no historical precedent, which triggers bankruptcies throughout the business and personal sectors, throwing very large numbers of families into distress and inducing a sharp jump in the suicide statistics both in the United States and abroad. Foreclosures escalate, as do factory and corporate closures and failures.

• The stock market slump and knock-on consequences in related financial markets spread like a malicious contagion worldwide, with unpredictable outcomes universally conducive to an initial global slump.

• Chaotic currency realignments proliferate. If one underlying globalist intention had been to exploit this developing crisis to ‘call for‘ a world currency, this project, like all such globalist forward planning and conspiracies, turns out to be a monumental failure

Instead, what has been achieved is that:

• The world currency, financial and trading systems rapidly disintegrate, leading to the worldwide imposition of foreign trade tariffs and to a parallel ferocious, no-holds-barred, ruthless scramble for global energy resources that is far more intense than the current scramble, with extreme dangers for humanity.

• The criminal kleptocracy congratulates itself on having brought about the revolutionary collapse that their mad ideology requires, on the demented model of breaking everything up and rebuilding from the rubble. But like the hideous wars that these mad people instigate, ‘the law of unintended consequences‘ kicks in, and they wind up destroying their massive wealth and themselves, along with everyone else: THE SAMPSON OPTION.

Not very clever.

Note: July 2009: Of course, not all these predictions made on 2nd September 2006 and repeated on 3-4 December 2007 have yet come to pass. But many of them have!

• The resolution, compliant with the Rule of Law, has been ‘set in stone’, which will have the effect that the total collapse is averted in the nick of time, provided that the sabotage operations cease (uncertain at this posting) – and thanks exclusively to the impressive strength of character of the most important and powerful sovereign human being alive in the world today.

LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon’s vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the ‘highest’ levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA’s master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this ‘in-your-face’ by advertising ‘INTEL INSIDE’, which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the ‘fully collaborating’ firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable ‘file and printer sharing’ under any circumstances. If you say ‘YES’, so to speak, to ‘file and printer sharing’, your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA’s master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton ‘Box Gang’ and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD’s World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor’s own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable ‘Preview before downloading’ feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.

REFINANCING THE WORLD AND REFLOATING THE U.S. DOLLAR

WORLD COMMUNITY CONFRONTS THE WELTKRIMINALGESELLSCHAFT

Friday 9 May 2008 01:04

UPDATE, 10TH MAY 2008: Please see the new section immediately below headed:
SPECULATING ON THE OIL PRICE: HOW THE ‘BOX GANG’ AIMS TO GET ITS MONEY BACK

THE CURTAIN FALLS AT THE END OF ‘ACT ONE’ OF DIE MEISTERSCHWINDLERN

EXPLANATION OF OUR TERMINATION OF THE WANTAGATE REPORTS

MICHAEL C. COTTRELL M.S. CEASED TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH WANTA IN MARCH 2008

INTELLIGENCE ON THE PROGRESS OF THE $300 TRILLION SETTLEMENTS

PRESIDENT KENNEDY’S EXECUTIVE ORDER 11110 AND THE PRESENT CRISIS

9/11 MASS MURDERS PERPETRATED SO AS TO KILL THE REFORMATION ACT

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press ARCHIVE. Order your subscriptions and our ‘politically incorrect’, hence correct, intelligence books from the Edward Harle segment.

• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

• The white panel below NEWS gives details of our intel titles/books as they are published.

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing financial global corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. The Editor’s $35,000 Wanta bail-out money has been stolen.

THE CURTAIN FALLS AT THE END OF ‘ACT ONE’
As the curtain falls at the end of Act One of Die Meisterschwindlern, by Greenspoon (libretto by Busche), Unterreichsführer Reinhard B. Himmler, handler-in-chief for the Weltkriminalgesellschaft Bushe und Klintenstein, GmbH, DC and Dachau, contemplates the coming intermission with such trepidation as a perfectly possessed master operative with no soul is capable of.

(Hydraulics activating the descending curtain, by the way, courtesy of Wantagate, Inc., WI, purveyors of lethal exposure lubricants).

Seated next to Herr Himmler in the ‘Royal Box’ behind a decidedly necessary reinforced protective bullet-proof screen (as no-one knows how many infuriated Ponzi scam victims may be sitting in the auditorium) is the diminutive Führer himself, evidently somewhat the worse for wear, who, having lost the plot of the entire opera(tion) from the outset, has been compulsively fiddling around with the greyscreen monetary manipulation console that he had commandeered in or around June 2006 or earlier from the ‘late’ Hauptfinanzminister Heinrich Paulsohn, or else calling up the Virtual Wars and Virtual Rumours of Wars Department located at the Zentrum für Schrechtlichkeit Georg H. W. Busche, Langley and McLean, to order more virtual diversionary ploys while he contemplates the collapse of his Kriminalreich and of his disastrous and murderous period in office.

Occasionally, his distracted mind wanders back to those carefree days of his youth when blowing up live frogs with firecrackers was his favoured preoccupation.

To his right sits Frau Laura, who has been driven over from the Four Seasons Hotel after flying back, in a hurry, as usual from Dubai, for the occasion.

Unterreichsführer Himmler (Cheney) has meanwhile been racking his addled brain to come up with further deceptions and lies so as to delay, frustrate or abort the global refinancing Settlements.

As is described below, on Wednesday 7th May, his disinformation apparat disseminated a menu of lies and distortions, while the Unterreichsführer himself reportedly suffered another humiliation (as also reported below) when, US sources say, he sought yet again to interfere with the Settlements, which should have been concluded two weeks earlier. Despite appearances to the contrary, none of these belated attempts to frustrate the payouts, which were mandated by the Group of Seven at their meeting held during the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings on Sunday the 13th April 2008, have been successful; and the very latest intelligence available to the Editor of this service on 9th/10th April was that there were no impediments to completion.

The US sources told the Editor that the ‘riot act’ was read to him during a visit to Philadelphia the next day – a manifestly absurd procedure, as this has happened many times before, to no effect. Reading the riot act to this criminal is like offering him a tissue with which to blow his nose. Such hardened criminal meister-operatives are never susceptible to reasoned warnings of any kind.

In Philadelphia, we were told, Cheney tried yet again to interfere with the Settlements, possibly visiting one or more financial institutions there. But it was also reported that he delivered a ten-minute speech to about 100 workers at a Northeast Philadelphia plant which is printing the so-called ‘economic stimulus checks’, which is the operation that has been mounted to provide the necessary ‘explanation’ for the forthcoming economic rebound. When this happens, people will want to know WHY. The real answer will be that the Settlements have been released, but this will never be mentioned. Instead, the ‘economic stimulus checks’ being paid out to about 130 million Americans (by way also of an election bribe) will be hailed as an act of magnanimity on the part of Der Führer for which the 130 million beneficiaries should all be truly grateful. Cheney told workers that these payments represented ‘a shot of energy at the right time (i.e., election time) and in the right way’. The Untereichsführer’s peroration was delivered at the Philadelphia Regional Financial Center, one of four centres nationwide that are issuing some 88 million checks between now and July. More to the point here, this facility is a component of the US Treasury Department’s Financial Management Service, employing about 170 people. Did we say that the Philadelphia unit is part of the TREASURY? Yes SIR. Then why, pray, was Untereichsführer Cheney delivering this ten-minute speech, and not the US Treasury Secretary or the Undersecretary of the Treasury? Don’t send us your answers, PLEASE. It is naturally assumed that none of our readers are sitting on their brains.

Having successfully delayed the agreed Settlements for a further two weeks beyond the date when they should have been finalised, the Unterreichsführer doubtless assumed that he could continue, in ongoing collaboration with the Weltkriminalgesellschaft Bushe und Klintenstein GmbH, to block the huge payout Settlements. By definition, the combination of the Settlements (funds brought onto the balance sheet) and the banking reforms mandated by Basel-II, will effectively start to strangle and smother the globalist Dark Forces’ illegitimate financial spigot, thereby making it much harder for these desperate, cornered cadres to achieve their mad global hegemony objectives.

SPECULATING ON THE OIL PRICE: HOW THE ‘BOX GANG’ AIMS TO GET ITS MONEY BACK
As a proviso to this statement, it must be added that the blow to the criminalists’ finances delivered by the prospectively positive outcome of the Wantagate exposures and their global consequences, which the criminalists probably did not fully expect, is now in the process of being made up for by a preplanned criminalist operation to rig and escalate the price of oil. This is being done via massive speculative operations at the big oil firms, which have huge trading floors and are fully liquid.

Colossal illegitimate rental profits, derived from this speculative activity, are being siphoned off into Joint Venture Limited Liability Partnerships holding offshore bank accounts in the names of the usual criminalist suspects and others, along the Enron model (remember?).

THIS is how the Weltkriminalgesellshaft Busche und Klintenstein, GmbH., is ‘getting its own back’.

Please make a mental note of this factor when you read convoluted articles by ‘experts’ trying to work out why the oil price is rising when the dollar is appreciating, as occurred during the week ending on 9th May. This is a carefully orchestrated operation devised by and for the benefit of the ‘Box Gang’ and their associates, who want their lost money back. We will be exposing this latest financial scam, which explains why Goldman Sachs is talking about oil going to $200 a barrel, in a future analysis, for which some additional preparatory analytical work is necessary.

U.S. CONTRACTS WITH THE CHINESE
Back in the real world nearly two years earlier, on or about 21st June 2006, the Chinese authorities entered into a series of contracts with the US Treasury inter alia so as to mobilise $34 trillion held in C.H.I.P.S. (the Clearing House Interbank Payment System accounts used by the Fed to pay the banks) format, for one year and a day.

From this operation to ‘clear the C.H.I.P.S.’, the Chinese authorities stood to earn a profit estimated at $11.0 trillion, for a total due to them of roughly $45 trillion on maturity. However these accounts were fraudulently ‘hollowed out’ by Dr Alan Greenspan, Dr Ben Bernanke, Bush Sr., President Bush Jr. and the Clintons, with the funds and proceeds relocated offshore.

A series of agreements with the Chinese was in fact reached by the former US Treasury Secretary, John Snow and Dr Alan Greenspan, and then later by Dr Ben Bernanke and Henry M. Paulson Jr., in December 2005, and in January, May and June 2006. The May 2006 agreement involved the delivery of the $4.5 trillion ostensibly to finance the Wanta Settlement and ‘The Wanta Plan’, to employ the name coined by the Editor and accepted by the G-7 as ‘fit for purpose’.

The Chinese had also purchased a very large volume of US Treasury securities during the Reagan Administration, the total value of which is believed now to be of the order of $55 trillion. Thus, the Chinese have been owed about $100 trillion by the duplicitous US authorities. Additionally, older US obligations towards the Chinese relating back to the Ming dynasty, remained long outstanding.

When the maturity date for the $34 trillion (probably 21st June 2007) passed without payment, the tensions that had already arisen between Peking and Washington not least due to the retention by Paulson of the $4.5 trillion sent over by the People’s Bank of China in May 2006 ostensibly to fund the Wanta payment, as confirmed in Wanta’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus [see the Wantagate reports dated 24 June and 9 August 2007], which must be accurate or else the petitioner would have been committing perjury, rose several notches.

Back in December 2006, as we reported at the time, Paulson had been arrested in Germany on the basis of a warrant issued by an ad-hoc World Court/ICJ tribunal in response to complaints received concerning his illegal retention/theft of funds. He was exfiltrated from German custody by British contract operatives (Sandline agents) and then flown over to Washington aboard an almost empty British Airways plane, whereupon he was dumped at the Washington Cathedral, just in time to fall asleep at the endless memorial service for the late President Gerald Ford.

For, far from repaying the Chinese in accordance with the several contracts, the American official kleptocracy and their bankster associates continued trading the Chinese funds without China’s authority, using the Chinese $34 trillion as a trading platform, just as they had continued to trade and to leverage the ‘Wanta’ $4.5 trillion, as reported by this service. In short the US crooks wilfully and criminally failed to relinquish control of funds that did not belong to them.

WANTAGATE MASKED AND EXPOSED FAR LARGER PARALLEL FRAUDS
Thus, while we were concentrating upon exposing the scandalous machinations, excuses and foul play exhibited by US Treasury Secretary H. M. Paulson Jr., Vice President R. Cheney and the Bush II White House specifically over the ‘Leo Emil Wanta’ funds, a much bigger, even darker, ongoing criminalist scandal surrounding the exploitation of the Chinese funds was going sour in parallel.

Ironically, our exposures of the sordid shenanigans surrounding the ‘Leo Wanta’ funds served the ‘unintended consequence’ of dislodging, destabilisng and extensively exposing the much bigger financial corruption operations that were taking place at the same time as the hijacking of the ‘Leo Wanta’ funds and the endless US official shiftiness that our Wantagate reports exposed.

On 19th July 2007, a huge replacement LOAN worth an estimated $6.2 trillion was structured and approved within the Bank of England and made available principally by Her Majesty The Queen for delivery to the Bank of New York Mellon, within which $4.5 trillion was now earmarked ostensibly for payment to Wanta and his Commonwealth of Virginia-based AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., or so we were advised at the time [see the Wantagate report dated 30th July 2007]. Since these funds are LOAN funds, they could be withdrawn more or less on demand.

After various vicissitudes, it was established in September 2007 (as we also reported at the time) that the loan funds were held with Citibank; and it subsequently emerged that these ‘Wanta’ funds were/are held in a suspense account at that institution, precisely because the funds were on loan mainly from The Queen, and could/can therefore be withdrawn at any time on demand, if they were not expected to be applied in accordance with the lenders’ specific instructions.

Coincidentally or otherwise, on the anniversary of the Chinese contract (21st June 2007), the Bank of New York Mellon advised the US Treasury that (following its then scheduled merger accord with the US securities broker/dealer Mellon Financial Corporation effective 1st July 2007), it would be able ‘to guarantee the delivery’ of the ‘Wanta’ $4.5 trillion to the corporate securities account of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. within the Citibank Morgan Stanley Securities House bank account.

That assertion was a serious felony under the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934, since no American securities house can guarantee any security or the delivery of funds or securities: only banks can guarantee delivery. Our report dated 30th July 2007 explained how Bank of New York Mellon, which was to act solely as a conduit, effectively diverted/stole the huge LOAN funds, which had been the subject of a bank ‘levy’, thereby further encumbering the balance sheets of the six ‘levy banks’ concerned – Crédit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, UBS, Citibank, Bank of America, and Bank of England.

In the United States, any payment of $1.0 trillion or more is required to be subject to a ‘levy’, to be signed and submitted to the US Treasury, to the Federal Reserve and a financial institution – in this instance, the Bank of New York Mellon, which was guaranteeing the cash and delivery thereof to the institution concerned (Bank of New York Mellon, thus guaranteeing delivery to itself). The $6.2 trillion LOAN proceeds were subjected to a levy via the US law firm of Troutman Sanders LLP. In signing the levy, these institutions placed significant ongoing burdens onto their reserves.

DOUBLE-CROSSING THE EDITOR: ONE ‘SWITCH’ TOO FAR
Following these manoeuvres and our exposures of them on our website, the kleptocracy came under severe pressure, which was exacerbated when the Wanta team turned up at Citigroup, 153 East 53rd Street in Midtown New York on 26th October 2007 and also at the premises of Morgan Stanley, 1585 Broadway and 48th Street on the same day – and then again at Citibank, 399 Park Avenue on 20th November 2007, to demand performance by the institutions on the $4.5 trillion.

When the Wanta party were ordered off the Citibank premises on 20th November 2007, having been clandestinely photographed and accompanied, as they left, by the abrupt appearance at the doors of two armed NYPD policemen, Mr Wanta twice ordered his then colleague Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., to ‘Call Chris’; and the Editor was thus duly informed of this scandalous, farcical escalation in ‘real time’ – notwithstanding that on 3rd November 2007, Mr Wanta had told Mr Cottrell that ‘we have to sever our connections with Christopher Story: but don’t tell him’.

In other words, on the one hand Leo E. Wanta had indicated that he would be dispensing with the Editor’s requisitioned services – we had doubtless become ‘too powerful’ – while on the other hand, Wanta, when in distress some weeks later, ordered Mr Cottrell to ‘Call Chris’ TWICE, so that the details of his predicament vis-à-vis Citibank could be posted immediately on our website in order for the whole world to be informed about what was going on.

Unfortunately, Mr Wanta cannot have it both ways. The Editor’s services were not his property, to use, exploit and discard in accordance with his latest whims and requirements. And so, as it duly turned out, this behaviour represented just one double-cross too many.

At all events, the Editor had no reason to know at the time that his requisitioned publicity platform and services were no longer required at all; and indeed he did not become aware that he had been double-crossed, until 17th March 2008 (see below): we therefore continued the Wantagate reports as though nothing had changed. The Editor’s $35,000, provided from scarce private resources in good faith to bail Leo Wanta out of his unlawful probation in Wisconsin, has not been repaid and is therefore now categorised as having been stolen.

On 18th March, the Editor posted the final Wantagate report, indicating to Mr Wanta and anyone else who cared to take note, that so far as Michael C. Cottrell. M.S., and the Editor of this service were concerned, neither would be able to be associated at all, in any way with any activities which may be conducted beyond the Rule of Law, if that was the intention. We thought we made this clear.

The Editor’s suspicions having been aroused, though, he now became aware, as mentioned, that – in conformity with the standard filthy US criminal intelligence community routine – he had indeed been deceived and double-crossed.

This became clear after he had requested, on the 14th March 2008, a written statement from Leo Emil Wanta confirming that all transactions to be undertaken under the Wanta Plan and otherwise, would conform at all times 100% with the Rule of Law, which had been so conspicuously and boldly promulgated via our Wantagate reports, with Leo Wanta’s enthusiastic ongoing support. This was rejected out of hand by one of Mr Wanta’s other colleagues on his behalf, three hours later.

After all, both on our website and in International Currency Review, we had repeatedly displayed a list of the US Statutes and securities regulations of which named parties and institutions were and remain in breach, together with authoritative US legal statements of the position with regard to the torts of Fraud in the Inducement, Fraud by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft, Fraudulent Deceit, and Theft by Deception, Fraudulent Conveyance and Fraudulent Concealment.

How, then, could either Mr Cottrell or the Editor of this service go along with any practice other than 100% adherence to the US Rule of Law, or even with the slightest suspicion that it might be intended not to adhere to it? Besides, in communications to the President of the United States – for instance, in his letter dated 31st August 2007 – Mr Leo Wanta himself had specifically appealed for President Bush to adhere to the Rule of Law:

‘If US President George W Bush, Jr. is operating under the “Rule of Law” which is absolutely shattered “by others”…’.

Evidently the Rule of Law mattered then, but no longer mattered now.

MICHAEL C. COTTRELL SEVERS RELATIONS WITH WANTA
Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., was appointed Secretary/Treasurer of Wanta’s AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc, at a Board meeting held in Richmond, VA, on 28th December 2004. Then, on the 16th December 2005, he was appointed to be Executive Vice President and Treasurer of the corporation, and various joint ventures with Mr Cottrell’s own company, Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., were authorised.

On the 14th August 2006, Michael Cottrell was able, thanks to his securities market credentials, good standing and reputation, to obtain a corporate securities account for Wanta’s AmeriTrust Groupe Inc., into which the $4.5 trillion Wanta ‘compromise’ settlement funds were to be paid.

Mr Cottrell insisted throughout that a corporate securities account would be mandatory, so far as he was concerned, for fundamental reasons alluded to in earlier reports on this website.

For instance, under the 1933 and 1934 Securities Acts, the assets of clients of US broker-dealers are not included within the assets of the institution, so that they cannot be sequestrated – contrary to the position with US banks. Mr Cottrell advised that given that all Leo E. Wanta’s bank accounts appeared to have been raided and ransacked, he, of all people, ought to be aware that US banks cannot be trusted and that ‘his’ funds would be permanently at risk in any bank account.

This advice was rejected outright by Wanta, thereby removing any point in Mr Wanta employing the services of a financial adviser and securities expert, let alone an expert of the calibre of Michael C. Cottrell, M.S.. If Wanta was not prepared to listen to this expert, and to pay proper attention to his conscientious advice, how could he (Mr Cottrell) perform his duties?

For this and other reasons, such as Wanta’s generally indisciplined approach to transactions, Mr Cottrell finally indicated, in the first quarter of 2008, that he would not be able to participate at all with Wanta in the pre-planned joint venture and other transactions unless (a) the transactions were to be conducted, as arranged and previously agreed, via the corporate securities account which had been made available due to Mr Cottrell’s own credentials; and (b) an Oversight Panel was to be appointed with a brief to supervise all such transactions.

The most obvious reason for this second demand was that should any decisions be made by Wanta arbitrarily, and transactions undertaken, contrary to Michael C. Cottrell’s professional advice and in defiance of the regulations and the Rule of Law, it would not just be Mr Wanta that would be liable, but Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., would be liable, as Executive Vice President/Treasurer, as well.

We hinted at this situation in our Wantagate report dated 3rd March 2008, which was specifically designed to warn Wanta of the consequences of any deviation from the Rule of Law. To no avail.

When all his necessary professional advice ‘went nowhere’, Mr Cottrell prepared to separate from Wanta. On 23rd March 2008, though, Leo Wanta jumped the gun by issuing a three-page document headed ‘Minutes of Special Meeting of the Sole Shareholder of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.’, implying that Wanta had held a meeting with himself. He faxed this irregular document to Michael Cottrell.

Elementary business practice requires the DIRECTORS, not the shareholder(s), to convene and hold Board Meetings, which issue Resolutions. This document, which was distributed ‘to others’ and is in any case in the public domain in Richmond, VA (see below), contained this paragraph:

‘BE IT RESOLVED, that the undersigned hereby directs that the Officers and the Directors of the Corporation take all such official actions as may be required to notify all outside parties including banks, financial houses, securities dealers, government agencies, government officials (foreign and domestic) that MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, M.S., has no right, authority and/or fiduciary capacity to conduct any form of business either in law and/or equity on behalf of the Corporation [AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.] and/or on behalf of any other Officer, Director and/or Shareholder of the Corporation’.

As the formally appointed Executive Vice President and Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. [see above] Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., who had now been dismissed by Wanta by means of an irregular document, proceeded, as instructed, to regularise the situation by fulfilling his responsibilities to the letter and promptly filing notification of his ‘resignation’ with the relevant Commonwealth of Virginia authorities in Richmond, using the forms that they provide for such purposes – enclosing the various pertinent documents including the irregular ‘dismissal’ document issued by Leo Wanta, and directing the Commonwealth of Virginia State authorities to forward all documentation and taxation demands to Wanta’s address in Wisconsin.

As noted, all this filing and related documentation sits in the public domain in Richmond. It will of course be recalled that Wanta represented that he was not running a business out of the State of Wisconsin [see Wantagate report dated 6th August 2007, all of which remains accurate and is in no way nullified by this latest sequence of events].

For the record also, Wanta issued a document dated 26th February 2006 labelled TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, which is likewise in the public domain, which reads inter alia as follows:

Settlement Offers, e.g. December 12, 2006, et al: ‘This letter authorizes Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., the President of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., as of this date, to conclude the details and disposition of said settlement funds for deposit via Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. Account(s) on behalf of Leo E. Wanta/Lee E. Wanta with the United States Social Security Number’ [redacted].

This document was signed by Wanta and appropriately witnessed.

Separately, Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., is believed to have prepared due diligence documentation running to several hundreds of pages containing inter alia papers signed by Leo/Lee Wanta giving details of agreed financial operations and pay orders worth very large aggregate sums of money, to be made available as required to demonstrate the damage that Mr Cottrell and his own corporation have suffered. It is understood that the evidence that is contained in this due diligence portfolio will be likely to have profound and painful repercussions.

‘Fraud by Inducement‘ springs immediately to mind in this context. Entering into huge financial undertakings without the finances to fund them, may represent Fraud by Inducement. As for this Editor’s paltry $35,000, as separately mentioned, it is nearly one year overdue and is currently considered to have been stolen. Stealing money is still a felony, even in the United States.

All of the above will explain, to anyone who may have been puzzled, why we posted the Wantagate article dated 18th March 2008, which represented the FINAL attempt by Mr Cottrell, supported by the Editor of this service, to try to make it clear to Wanta and relevant parties that adherence to the US Rule of Law with no deviation therefrom at any time now or in the future, would remain the only criterion that would determine whether or not Mr Cottrell could be a party to any transactions to be conducted by and with Wanta generally, and specifically in the format of the The Wanta Plan.

NOVEMBER 2007: THE KLEPTOCRACY COMES UNDER REAL PRESSURE
Reverting now to events which preceded the severance outlined above: the aforementioned visits by the Wanta team, as then constituted, to the two institutions that were involved in playing games with the $4.5 trillion, sent a powerful tsunami of belated alarm throughout those key elements of the international financial community then ‘in the know’, since we understand that neither Citibank nor Morgan Stanley thought that the Wanta people would ever turn up at those institutions.

It is further understood that the three Wanta team visits caused consternation and trepidation in the Boardrooms of both institutions, and throughout Wall Street generally.

The main problem facing the very large financial institutions is that they have been involved in tax evasion on a monumental scale, inter alia by using exempted accounts held with the International Monetary Fund to channel and handle undeclared, ongoing untaxed exotic financial refunding and discounting transactions ‘below the radar’, which is one of several sound reasons why the blunt description ‘criminal enterprise’ as applied to these enterprises in general cannot be disputed.

OVERSIGHT PROPOSAL IMMEDIATELY ACCEPTED AS MANDATORY
It may be recalled that it was in our closing Wantagate Report (18th March 2008), that Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. first made it clear, in public, that he would not now be participating in any pre-agreed financial transactions with Leo E. Wanta without the reassurance and backstop to be provided by an Oversight Panel, in order to ensure that all Wanta transactions complied 100% with the Rule of Law at all times – which would presuppose that any off-balance sheet, undercover, secret, untaxed and otherwise irregular transactions, would be precluded and that he, Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., could not accordingly be implicated in any such irregular transactions.

The Editor supported this stance with his own commendation, stating that, given our common human nature and the temptations to which we are all subject, no-one could object to such a requirement. Further details, with documents, are published in International Currency Review.

In light of the instances of the ongoing financial criminality exposed inter alia via the Wantagate reports, the Group of Seven (G-7) financial powers have finally demanded, as pointed out in our report dated 12th April 2008, that the scandalous hijacking of the global financial economy by the reckless Bush-Clinton ‘shadow government’ grabitisation network (a.k.a. Weltkriminalgesellschaft Bushe und Klintenstein, GmbH) will no longer be tolerated – pointedly endorsing, in a reprimand to the White House and to the criminal elements resident inside the US Treasury and the biggest Wall Street institutions, the report of the Financial Stability Forum (FSF) publicised during the Spring Meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank (1), which now demanded much stricter discipline and safeguards against embedded criminality throughout the financial system.

Specifically, the Group of Seven (G-7) Ministers and Governors stated that ‘we… strongly endorse the report and commit to implementing its recommendations. Rapid implementation of the Financial Stability Forum report will not only enhance the resilience of the global financial system for the longer term, but should help to support confidence and improve the functioning of the markets’.

The G-7 statement claimed that the report presented a specific and substantive set of practical reform recommendations, identifying four rigorous proposals which MUST be implemented over the 100 days (2) following the international agreement to release (reached on Sunday, 13th April) to be augmented by five further requirements, including the following:

• ‘Strengthening the authorities’ responsiveness to risk: Supervisors and central banks should further strengthen cooperation and exchange of information, including the assessment of financial stability risks. It is important that an “international college of supervisors” be established for EACH OF THE LARGEST GLOBAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS’.

• ‘Market authorities should also act cooperatively and swiftly TO INVESTIGATE AND PENALIZE FRAUD, MARKET ABUSE, AND MANIPULATION’.

• What this meant was that each of the big financial institutions is to be supervised by a separate international supervisory and monitoring ‘college’, so as to enforce discipline and rectitude within this free-wheeling, headstrong and aberrant segment of the international financial community.

Logically, therefore, ANY organisation controlling very large sums of money would be considered a financial institution requiring to be permanently subjected to the discipline and transparency to be demanded by its own ‘international college of supervisors’. That should include Wanta’s entity.

In other words, Mr Michael C. Cottrell’s stated REQUIREMENT for an Oversight Panel to monitor the financial operations in which he was to be involved, has been ADOPTED ACROSS THE BOARD and is now an IRREVOCABLE NECESSITY, as a specific, predictable and unavoidable consequence of the wayward, arrogant, swashbuckling financial fraud, endless lies and duplicity, the open-ended theft and institutionalised criminality spotlighted inter alia by the Wantagate reports.

This reprobate behaviour continues to this day, not only because these criminal leopards cannot change their spots, but also as the thieves try vainly to disguise their abject defeat by maximising the potential for obfuscating it with evil and crass diversionary ploys of every description.

OPPOSITION TO OVERSIGHT EXPOSES THE OBJECTOR
Manifestly, any antagonism towards, and open opposition to, this logical response to decades of fraudulent, untaxed finance and tax evasion, exposes objectors as being unwilling to submit to the Rule of Law and to the disciplines at long last demanded by the international community, now that this open-ended financial criminality has been exposed.

Hence, there can be no turning back on this score, so that anyone resisting this measure will, by definition, automatically attract the attention of national supervisors and law enforcement, whether connected with the criminalised intelligence community or not, as being prospectively liable in the future to flout the Rule of Law, so that such persons could never be trusted to handle large sums of money in a transparent manner. And given what has been exposed, nor should they be.

Interestingly, minimal attention was directed towards this matter during the weeks immediately following the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings, which is why we stress its importance here.

As we pointed out, with emphasis, in our report on 12th April:

• THE FSF’S DEMAND FOR EACH LARGE INSTITUTION TO BE ENCUMBERED WITH ITS OWN SEPARATE ‘COLLEGE’ WHICH WILL MONITOR ITS OPERATIONS IS A CLEAR, AND DECISIVE, INDICATION THAT THE G-7 HAS FINALLY ACCEPTED THE ACCURACY OF OUR EXPOSURES
OF OPEN-ENDED FINANCIAL CORRUPTION AT THE BIG BANKS.

• THIS WOULD EXPLAIN WHY OUR DESIGNATION OF CERTAIN HUGE INSTITUTIONS AS CRIMINAL ENTERPRISES HASN’T BEEN CHALLENGED. BECAUSE IT’S ACCURATE.

• THE GROUP OF SEVEN AGREES WITH US.

• IT CAN BE FURTHER ELABORATED THAT THE G-7’S RELATED POINTED REFERENCE TO FRAUD AND MANIPULATION IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT MAKES IT CLEAR THAT WE ARE ON THE SAME PAGE AS THE G-7 (OR RATHER, VICE VERSA).

• THE G-7 HAS FINALLY, AT LONG LAST, WOKEN UP TO THE OBVIOUS REALITY, WHICH HAS BEEN SCANDALOUSLY IGNORED BY THE COMPLACENT ACADEMIC COMMUNITY ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ATLANTIC, THAT THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CRISIS IS ALL ABOUT THE FRAUDULENT FINANCE PERPETRATED WITH IMPUNITY AT THE WORLD’S BIGGEST BANKS.

THE WANTAGATE EXPOSURES AND THE CREDIT CRUNCH
Meanwhile, as the impact inter alia of the Wantagate reports about these scandals reverberated around the official world, the true proportions of US official and banking sector fraudulent finance and scamming sank in, triggering the generalised crisis of confidence that erupted in July 2007 – focused on securitised investment vehicles (SIVs) which were now suspected of incorporating fake mortgage documentation (euphemistically referred to as ‘sub-prime ‘mortgages, but which actually represented, in part, ‘virtual assets’ backed by nothing at all).

It was now realised that the Americans had been flogging dud paper all over the world, that these scams were orchestrated or aided and abetted by US official and intelligence cadres, and that it was by no means an exaggeration to refer, as this service has done, to certain huge American banks as criminal enterprises. This stricture is known to have caused ‘angst’ on Wall Street.

The upshot was that, as we reported, at least 4,500 US bankers were rounded up and flown to European centres last year, where they were subjected to interrogation. The actual number of bankers rounded up in September-November 2007 may have reached 6,000. It will be recalled that we reported that nine aircraft were ‘requisitioned’ for the purposes of conveying the handcuffed bankers to the European interrogation centres, and that, in many instances, wives and partners were given no opportunity to say goodbye or even to telephone their families.

As a consequence of these interrogations, the gravely affronted international community obtained watertight specifics and evidence about the massive proportions of the ongoing financial thefts and fraudulent finance, leveraging, exploitation and other abuses of stolen funds, including the $34 trillion belonging to the Chinese parties, the $6.2 trillion of loan funds made available by HM The Queen, and of course the original $4.5 trillion provided in 2006 by the People’s Bank of China in apparent response to the ‘surfacing’ of Leo Emil Wanta, when he ‘ceased to be dead’ contrary to the CIA’s promulgated lie to that effect, after the Editor of this service provided the sum of $35,000 with which ‘Restitution’ was paid to the Wisconsin Department of Corrections for remittance to the corrupt Wisconsin State Department of Revenue [see report dated 6th August 2007].

It should be added here that the Editor has received NO RESPONSE from Judge James Martin, of Wisconsin, to whom he wrote last October under the ‘Misprision of Felony’ Statute, pointing out the scandalous triplication of tax-collection and other fabrications by the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue. It was incumbent upon the Editor to draw his attention to these abominations.

AGGRIEVED FOREIGN PARTIES POOL INFORMATION AND RESOURCES
It is believed that in the course of November last year, the Chinese authorities, MI6 (on behalf of Her Majesty), the Swiss authorities, the Group of Seven, perhaps the representatives of the 160 payee countries and other aggrieved parties pooled their resources in the face of these endless US outrages, so that thereafter the pressure exerted by the international community proved to be relentless, and far more effective than had been the case earlier.

There was confirmed talk of an international economic embargo being imposed upon the United States, as we reported; and tensions became more evident inside the Beltway, beginning with that incident when a blaze broke out at the Old Executive Office Building on 19th December 2007, as cover for the seizure of yet more damning evidence of official corruption from Cheney files by US Special Forces operatives.

‘PAULSON EVENTS’ DID NOT DISCREDIT THE WANTA FILES
The shootings that occurred on 28th/29th December 2007, can now be understood in the broader context of aggrieved parties, domestic and external, taking matters into their own hands. A high-level decision was subsequently made to maintain the fiction that Paulson remained both alive and US Treasury Secretary, despite massive evidence to the contrary, culminating in intelligence from several sources that Treasury officials have been referring to the ‘Paulson’ as ‘the double’.

None of the intelligence on this subject that we published on 2nd and 9th January 2008 has ever been officially denied, while the information was very specifically reconfirmed inter alia by a former Governor of the Federal Reserve Board, a US Ambassador (both of whose identities are known to us but have been suppressed by us on request), and by the US State Department itself.

That Department is known to lie frequently; and if it did so on this occasion, it will bear its own responsibility and iniquity. Attempts to discredit the Wanta files could never have succeeded anyway, as a substantial proportion of them have long since been published in facsimile format in International Currency Review, and are thus resident in files, libraries and safe locations all over the world. Wantagate and its consequences cannot be stuffed back into the genie’s bottle.

A Japanese visitor to the Editor’s London office in late March informed us that the ‘Paulson’ who appeared at the Group of Eight meeting held in Tokyo on 10th February 2008, was replaced by a second ‘Paulson’ half way through the conference, implying that there are multiple Mr P. ‘doubles’. Nothing has ever been heard from the family about this affair.

Paulson had alienated vast funds inter alia to Bank Leumi.

That such violence erupted – after an earlier gun battle in the Vice President’s premises in June 2007 had been hushed up, like the attempt by US Special Forces to ‘take out’ Herr Cheney while his plane was parked on the runway at Sydney Airport, Australia, during the spring of 2007 – can today be more easily comprehended given the unprecedented magnitude of the exposed financial scams being committed on a gargantuan scale by the organised criminal mafiosi occupying the highest offices in the United States. The timing of the attack to ‘take out’ Cheney in Australia related, we suspect, to the stealing of The Queen’s gold on 29th-30th March 2007 – another colossal criminal operation layered on top of those already cited, and which was only rectified around July 2007 (we believe) after insistent pressure from The Queen, and our reports suggesting that the American Ambassador should be kicked out of London. Where possible, these ‘things’ are done abroad.

WAS RAFIDAIN BANK A FACTOR BEHIND THE THEFT OF THE QUEEN’S GOLD?
The Editor speculates that a US official criminalist ‘rationalisation’ for the stealing of The Queen’s gold may have been a possible refusal by the British authorities to allow any US access to the $100 trillion or so of estimated fiat assets accumulated by Mr Saddam Hussein and his late sons in Bank Rafidain (see below), which were believed to have been retained in sub-accounts of the London branch of that institution. This in turn means that these ‘Saddam Hussein’ assets appear to have been annexed by the British authorities and banks, not least to buttress the financial positions of banks in the City of London. All international strife and tensions are about MONEY, not resources.

BROWN SHOULD HAVE LECTURED THE WHITE HOUSE ON HOW TO BEHAVE
Notwithstanding the general outrage surrounding the theft of The Queen’s gold, Gordon Brown, the British Prime Minister – whose 55 minute audience of The Queen on 27th June 2007, when he attended at Buckingham Palace to be appointed Prime Minister, is believed to have focused on Her Majesty’s extreme concern about the stealing by US criminal operatives of her gold – failed to take the opportunity to give the American Administration a piece of his mind, when he delivered a knee-jerk globalist speech at the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum in Boston on 18th April 2008. Sophisticates would argue that you don’t abuse a formal platform provided by a foreign government as an honour, by criticising the host authorities. This would be fine if the authorities in question had not criminally attempted to impoverish an allied Head of State.

This was an occasion when Brown could have ttorn the Bush II White House to shreds in public, speaking the only language that these veteran mega-criminals can understand. In doing so, Brown would have greatly enhanced his faltering domestic support: standing up to this odious American Government would be worth a huge number of British votes. Admittedly Gordon Brown did allude to tensions between Britain and the United States in oblique terms – observing that ‘we urgently need to step out of the mindset of competing interests and instead find our common interests – and we must summon up the best instincts and efforts of humanity in a cooperative effort to build new international rules and institutions for the new global era’ (code for ‘your selfishness sucks’).

But one cannot appeal to the ‘best instincts of criminals’, because they don’t have any: so that was absurd. Then Mr Brown revealed, loud and clear, that he is an international socialist, which he has never, as far as we know, done in public before: ‘That is how we must respond, not walking away as we did in Rwanda at the cost of many thousands of lives, but by becoming engaged as hard-headed internationalists’. Unfortunately, this British Prime Minister’s ‘hard-headed internationalism’ does not seem to extend to Zimbabwe, where the abominations perpetrated by Mr Mugabe’s Illuminati-sponsored ‘Black’ dictatorship are reported to be on the verge or morphing into genocide.

When such ‘hard-headed internationalists’ use typically clichéd ideological rhetoric, what they are actually driving at is that national boundaries, national sovereignty and nation states generally are expendable, in the interests of prompting and realising the ‘new global era’ – Brown’s euphemism for The New Underworld Order. The Prime Minister is a master of the dull, repetitious cliché, and his mind appears to be choked with all the false diversionary globalist issues, viz. ‘climate change’.

This internationalist bogey, by the way, has recently changed its name from ‘global warming’ because the scientific evidence that human activity is responsible for it has been shown to be spurious and riddled with holes. For instance, in the 1950s, numerous mammalian fossils were unearthed during foundation works in Trafalgar Square, Pall Mall, Lower Regent Street, and also Cockspur Street, in Central London – the remains of hippopotami, lions, hyaenas, straight-tusked elephants, aurochs, and bison, which patrolled the area approximately 125,000 years ago (3).

Finally, after trotting out the usual empty and duplicitous verbiage about ‘America leading the world in the fight against terrorism’ – when, as a British intelligence officer, Brown must surely be aware that the United States deliberately promotes international terrorism as an instrument of state and internationalist policy – Brown concluded with an invocation of the ‘special relationship’.

But this was destroyed when US Government’s criminalist cadres stole The Queen’s gold, and has been further undermined by the recalcitrant behaviour of the Bush-Clinton Weltkriminalgesellshaft régime over its retention of financial assets that do not belong to the United States contrary to the exasperated will of the international community. Talk of a ‘special relationship’ against this very well-known background is both dishonest and meaningless: and only the probably ignorant and sycophantic audience at the John F Kennedy Presidential Library could have been impressed.

BROWN PINNING HOPES ON A SHARP ECONOMIC RECOVERY
Following the severe drubbing that Brown’s Labour Government received from the disaffected electorate in local government and London elections on 1st May, press analysis of the expected outcome contained few indications that the UK ‘mainstream’ media had much of a clue about the unprecedented scale of the global refinancing operation that was taking place behind the scenes – with the exception of the following closing remarks that appeared on the front page of The Daily Telegraph, London, on 2nd May 2008:

‘Key to the Labour recovery is an optimistic view of the UK economy. The Bank of England on Wednesday said that the worst of the global credit crunch could be over and Mr Brown is betting on a significant upturn’ (4).

The observations revealed, of course, that, as a senior UK intelligence officer, Brown knew that the refinancing releases, involving the placement of some $300 trillion onto the books – a process that was necessarily taking time to complete – was well under way, and could indeed reach the anticipated satisfactory (for some) conclusion.

This ‘optimistic’ view of future economic and financial prospects was supported (on 6th May) by Sir Win Bischoff, the leading UK banker who was ‘parachuted in’ to Citibank, New York, last autumn, almost certainly to ensure that The Queen’s loan funds held within that institution (in a suspense account) were properly safeguarded. It was further supported on the 7th May by George Soros (on Bloomberg) and again by several German bankers (Forbes). These hints reflect the reality that well-placed bankers know that the Settlements are proceeding, and that repeated ongoing attempts by the Weltkriminalgesellschaft to block them, will not be allowed to succeed.

A further oblique indication that ‘matters are proceeding’ behind a deliberately contrived veil of obfuscation (consisting of contrived ‘virtual’ tensions, an information blackout about the releases, an attempt to ignite a virtual-cum-real diversionary conflagration in the Middle East, the ‘economic stimulus checks’ and much confused reporting by the Fifth Estate), concerns the outlook for the two huge 60,000-tonne aircraft carriers for The Queen/Royal Navy, estimated to cost $4.0 billion each. The Editor is in a position to know that this project, which the Ministry of Defence has ring-fenced, is to be financed out of ‘settlement money’. Hitherto, Parliament has been aggravated by the fact that the Ministry of Defence has prevaricated and refused to provide it with information as to when the contracts for these huge carriers will be announced. Various references to this matter have appeared recently in the British Press. On 9th May, the London media reported that defence sources had stated that the Ministry of Defence is to agree a contract for the ships within the next few weeks. The Ministry of Defence cannot ‘agree a contract’ unless it has the funds with which to finance it, otherwise it will be engaged in Fraud by Inducement.

Since the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings, and especially during the first week of May, six weeks after innumerable secret bank accounts holding stolen and unreported, untaxed funds had been ripped open, truly massive amounts of offshore monies (amounting to the estimated $300 trillion) had been repatriated to the United States for placing onto the books in conformity with the Basel-II requirements applicable to the ‘new’ banking régime.

As was previously reported on this website (17th April), the United States was dragged kicking and screaming like a spoilt child into the new Basel-II compliance banking environment with effect from one minute past midnight on Monday 14th April 2008.

That was a decisive development, given the US Government’s endless and crude resistance.

THE U.S. KAKOCRACY’S DESPERATE STRUGGLE FOR ‘IMMUNITY’
Faced with the imminent total exposure of their serial giga-criminality, the worst perpetrators of these crimes – the Bushes, Dr Alan Greenspan, the Clintons, Mr Cheney et al – had been exerting maximum pressure through their lawyers to obtain immunity from prosecution, trying their luck with the US Supreme Court as well as the World Court/ICJ.

By the third week of April, we had established that the World Court had REFUSED any immunity for Greenspan and former President W. Clinton (which means, incidentally, that the Clintons’ second (Irish) passports won’t be of use should either try to flee the United States, as Ireland subscribes to the jurisdictions of the World Court/ICJ).

We also understand that none of the US criminalist perpetrators are likely to ‘escape’ the wrath to come, and which is descending upon them ‘as we speak’. It is more than likely that, quite apart from other sanctions, China, having been finally repaid, will take measures to ensure that the retribution demanded by their culture is satisfied, according to several sober experts we have consulted.

Significantly, senior people were reported to us to have left the White House on Monday 21st April (information provided by an informed source at 6.30pm on that date), these departures having NOT been announced – implying that the rush for the exit had accelerated with a turn of events that had placed the international community decisively in the driving seat pending resolution of the crisis.

After all, since most of the key people even at the Treasury were expected to be arrested, hanging around in the doomed Bush II White House was no longer, for understandably alarmed operatives, a sensible option. Whether these people have fled the country is not yet known. It was further the case that George Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. were both informed that the absolute end of the road had been reached – and that if the releases were frustrated in any way, both would be arrested without any further ado. The CURRENT state of affairs is that the Settlements should have been completed over 3 weeks ago, and APPEARED to have been frustrated. However our best ‘special’ intelligence sources insist that this is not the case. The apparent information blackout is said to be contrived. [The US Solicitor General, Paul Clement, resigned on 14th May]

It was widely rumoured on Sunday 20th April that the Vatican, the Knights of Malta and the Knights Templar had been ‘paid’ – prompting appropriately cynical observations about a certain category of Illuminati recipient ‘naturally’ being paid first. Then again, on 2nd May, it was being said by different sources that the Mormons and the Knights of Malta were being funded before anyone else. These rumours were, surprisingly, reconfirmed to us on 15th May. We connot confirm the reconfirmations: we therefore report them ‘raw’, for the record.

Specifically, it was suggested earlier that the Vatican had been repaid $2.0 trillion (it’s always $2.0 trillion, isn’t it) which had been scammed from the Vatican Bank by George Bush Sr., who bled the bank dry after he was kicked out of Spain by Banco de España following our exposures in 2006.

Bush had pleaded with the Vatican to accept his funds, but as usual he had then orchestrated the ransacking of the receiving bank (by some means or other of which we are unaware).

The Vatican was said to have been repaid from the Marshall Act account, a CIA account which Bush Sr. had been using as his own private trading platform. Langley, after all, has been renamed ‘The George Bush Center for Intelligence’.

Separately, during the preceding week, the Knights of Malta evidently complained that they did not fancy being paid in US Treasuries, and after three days of negotiations they managed to procure an agreement that they should be paid in cash.

This may have been the origin of suggestions, which we reported on 17th April, that payments would be made in the form of Treasury securities, which, despite the fact that the United States is/has been completely bust and that the US Treasury cannot be trusted, are ironically the best assets obtainable, given that gold is subject to manipulation and its price is normally rigged.

UNUSUAL DEVELOPMENTS, AND DEATHS, BEHIND THE SCENES
On Monday 21st April, an attempt was made to arrest Vice President Richard B. Himmler (Cheney), which was thwarted when US Marshals tipped him off. It was later understood that these Marshals had been ‘handled’ by MI6 officers, who have been crawling around in the United States, along with Chinese and other World Court/ICJ agents, to procure an end already to the endless duplicity of the US kleptocracy-mafiosi and to assure final completion of the delayed releases.

All of which will have left the relevant US Congressional Committees, and numerous legislators, feeling most uncomfortable – not least since investigations conducted in Europe in the spring of 2007, as we reported at the time, turned up detailed information about offshore bank accounts held by over 1,500 individuals on Capitol Hill. It is unclear whether information concerning an estimated 200 bank accounts established in the past in Canada (allegedly with Royal Bank of Canada), which were at one time being ‘hidden’ by the since imprisoned ONI operative Mark Delmart Vreeland, had been thrown into the World Court/ICJ ‘mix’: but in the prevailing tense climate, these exposures can hardly have left anyone on Capitol Hill confident of not having his or her front door broken down in the middle of the night by Navy Seals (see below).

Many weeks earlier, intelligence was leaked about the untimely death of Austie Patricia McCracken, described as a former ‘CIA Project Director’. The Washington Post reported on the 8th March 2008, that ‘Ms Austie Patricia McCracken, 62, former Project Director for the CIA’s Counterintelligence Center, died [on] February 14th at her home in The Woodlands, Texas’. This ‘just happens’ to be where former President George H. W. Bush lives*. And McCracken ‘just happened’ to have been a key keeper of the funds (allegedly inter alia of the ‘Leo Wanta funds’) who could accordingly be assumed to have ‘known too much’. The newspaper report elaborated that ‘the cause of death is under investigation by the Montgomery County, Texas, Justice of the Peace Office’.

The report then broke with the norm and provided details which are NEVER divulged – from which the Editor deduces that the CIA, or elements of it, were/are extremely uptight about this sudden death. According to The Washington Post, ‘Ms McCracken joined the Central Intelligence Agency in 1967 and worked there for 23 years in field positions overseas as well as in the United States. She rose to personnel-evaluation management officer, to directorate equal employment opportunity officer, and to branch and deputy branch chief before becoming the Counterintelligence Center’s Project Director in 1989’.

‘When she retired in 1991, she received a Career Intelligence Medal and Citation, which noted that she was ‘known as a problem solver who possessed a phenomenal memory, very keen insight and excellent judgment’.

‘She was born in Hempstead, NY, and graduated from East Texas State University in Commerce, TX. After her retirement from the CIA, she moved to Orlando. She moved to Texas in November 2007. Her marriage to Paul Dale Roche ended in divorce. Survivors include two brothers’.

We are advised by an impeccable source ‘in the know’ that such details, as indicated, are NEVER divulged for public consumption. It can be speculated that she may have been enticed in some way to The Woodlands area of Houston by George Bush Sr., who may have needed to know what she knew about the accounts. The fact that The Washington Post only published this potted biography of this CIA woman on 8th March, when she died on 14th February, was also extremely suspicious.

Just three days later, in the early morning of 17th February 2008, according to ‘insider’ reports, a United Nations employee, Ms Maria DiBiase, plunged to her death from the 19th floor of the UN Headquarters building in New York City. The 19th floor houses the Department of Peace-Keeping Operations/Field Administration and Logistics Division (DPKO/FALD), as well as the code machines used for the encrypted fax equipment employed for DPKO operations, plus a spare range of code machines used for DPKO rapid response functions. The dead woman, from Austria, was reportedly a computer specialist for the United Nations, and a former Conference Services staff member with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna.

An Associated Press report dated Tuesday 19th February stated that police and UN security officers at the scene, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to talk to the media, said that the woman, in her 40s, had jumped from a window after turning up to work early in the morning of the previous Sunday. UN deputy spokeswoman, Marie Okabe, said that ‘a UN agency staff member died after falling from the 19th floor of the UN Secretariat Building. At this time there is no suspicion of foul play’. Ms Marie Okabe added that UN officials would not confirm the woman’s identity even after her next of kin had been notified. So details of the woman’s identity was left to a ‘licensed’ US website information source, which elaborated that:

‘The UN Special Commission (UNSCOM) maintained in a special United Nations computer database all the files on Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction program [that were] retrieved from the compact disks provided to UNSCOM by Saddam’s Government prior to the US invasion of Iraq. The database is reported to include all the black market nuclear suppliers involved in providing materials to Iraq, Iran, Pakistan and Libya via Turkey and the A Q Khan smuggling network. The list reportedly includes front companies in Switzerland linked to Marc Rich, the American fugitive pardoned by President Clinton, and Dick Cheney’.

The intelligence source was told that there may have been a ‘black bag’ operation taking place on the 19th floor at the same time that DiBiase arrived for work, to finish a project that was due on the following Monday morning, 18th February. The UNSCOM files reportedly validate many of former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds’ claims about nuclear smuggling that had been published earlier in The Sunday Times, London.

Marc Rich is a long-range Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD) operative named Hans Brand, who emigrated to Canada in 1954, staying initially in Saskatoon.

He has established a bank in Zug, Switzerland.

There was no mention in any of these and related reports of the two Soviet ships that left the Iraqi port of Umm Qasr about three weeks ahead of the US-led invasion, and then vanished.

These ships carried the physical evidence of weapons of mass destruction, in accordance with the standard Soviet-era policy of removing most traces of such weapons activity whenever the risk of Western retaliation was judged to have become excessive. In Romania, this standard official policy was codenamed ‘Operation Sarindar’, according to a Romanian defector – information that was first published in the US press in September 2003.

The Editor obtained outline details of how all traces of Mr Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction were extracted from Iraq ahead of the invasion in March 2003, inter alia from British and Russian (GRU) sources. This intelligence must have been known in London and Washington. Furthermore, it was reported in our Arab-Asian Affairs and Soviet Analyst intelligence services, which circulate among foreign governments and their intelligence communities.

TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF TOP-LEVEL ‘IMMUNITIES’ ALLOWED
On Tuesday 22nd April 2008, one week after the Settlements should have been finalised, it became known that the European parties and the Chinese had ‘allowed’ an extension of the ‘immunities’ for the key criminalists until 5.00pm on Friday 25th April – which date and time was then confirmed at the time by all our sources to represent the absolute deadline beyond which no further delay in effecting the Settlements would be tolerated. There is no way of telling whether this information represented a smokescreen of lies or not.

Also on the 22nd, an elderly Trustee aged 80, who had been working conscientiously on these matters for 20 years and had been repeatedly called into the relevant bank at all hours of the day and night at short notice in expectation of completions and releases, suddenly collapsed and was rushed to hospital. We were authoritatively advised that the Trustee had been in excellent health and that an attempt had been made on his life – a fact which evidently caused absolute fury behind the scenes. Indeed we were informed that ‘no resources will be spared’ to identity and ‘deal with’ whoever gave the order for this attempted liquidation of this conscientious octogenarian, and that ‘no mercy’ would be spared in this connection.

The ‘extension’ to the high-level US ‘immunities’ was granted, we were led to believe, because multiple verification procedures had been insisted upon by the Group of Seven (G-7), the World Court/ICJ, the Chinese authorities, the 160 governments whose representatives had been waiting impatiently as we had reported, since October 2007, and MI6 acting for HM The Queen. Of these powerful international forces arrayed against the duplicitous official criminalist mafiosi, the most formidable, apart from The Queen, has been Madame Wu, the Chinese Finance Minister.

SEIZURE OF 20 U.S. BANKS, FEDERAL RESERVE AND TREASURY THREATENED
Madame Wu was reported to have been equipped with a Writ of Execution or Lien from the World Court/ICJ (International Court of Justice) which can declare its own jurisdiction when any national jurisdictions fail in their duties against criminals, especially as China is a sovereign nation with its own Judge in the ICJ – enabling Madame Wu to foreclose on 20 banks, and to seize the Federal Reserve and the US Treasury on behalf of her own defrauded Government, the Group of Seven, the World Court/ICJ and The Queen, should the releases not (as matters then stood) be completed by 5.00pm on Friday 25th April.

Seizure of the Federal Reserve would deprive that decadent private institution of its only asset, namely the contract with the United States of America to print money – so that the United States would essentially cease to be sovereign, and would become a weak satrap of the international community which would remain the case at least until it had put its house in order.

However the releases were NOT completed by 5.00pm on Friday 25th April 2008: indeed, they had not even started. We did hear that two Trustees went to their banks at 4.00pm, within an hour of the deadline, and we thought that this might suggest that the official kleptocracy had suspended its blocking of the Settlements just in time to prevent Madame Wu from exercising her Writ of Lien.

That turned out to be the wrong interpretation. The delay, we learned on Saturday 26th April, was associated with the multiple third party verification procedures, including having documentation systematically signed and stamped by the US Supreme Court – the definitive effect of which was intended to be, to prevent any possibility of further highest-level US criminalist resistance and impediments to the Settlements, and thus to the refinancing of the United States and the world financial economies, and to the fifth refloating of the US dollar (see our report dated 17th April).

One cannot very well have transactions and the availability of funds verified by people who have lied, stolen and deceived for years on an open-ended basis.

NOTE: Following further ‘glitches’, to be elaborated later, Madame Wu was reported by sources to have exercised her Writ of Lien over at least FOUR banks by Saturday 17th May 2008. She was now thought to be operating a ‘salami tactics’ approach, with each successive failure to perform being following by the widening of her Writ of Execution to additional banks. The Liens on these banks destroy their creditworthiness. As of Saturday morning, this strategy was reported to be having the necessary effect. We will be reporting further on these developments [17th May 2008].

EXTENSIVE THIRD-PARTY VERIFICATION PROCEDURES
Hence, the necessary and agreed-upon third party verification and confirmation procedures, to confirm ‘eyes-on’ that the money was ‘there’, were scheduled for Monday 28th April, not Sunday 27th as assumed by some (which could not have occurred because the banks were not open in the generally accepted sense and such operations could not take place outside normal banking hours, the Editor was advised, without drawing attention to what was happening).

Thereafter, release procedures apparently continued without causing the international community in general, and Madame Wu in particular, undue concern. If documentation has to be verified and stamped, and given that we are talking about Settlements aggregating some $300 trillion, it can be understood that things have been taking ‘a little longer than anticipated’.

A total of 27 of the highest-level US office-holders and officials had been told that any further interference on their part would result in their immediate arrest. It should be pointed out that the ‘arrest’ environment is now much harsher than was even the case when the 4,500-6,000 bankers were being rounded up last October.

On the evening of Friday 25th April, 128 Navy Seals were flown into Washington, DC, from California and Colorado. These operatives do not ring the doorbell: they break the door down with sledge hammers. It is said that Navy Seals ‘eat other military personnel for lunch’.

We took this to indicate that, as Washington, DC, had earlier been said by certain ‘connected’ sources (unverified) to have been discreetly surrounded by the US military, including the 82nd Airborne, since at least March, with deployments to the DC area starting even earlier, arrests of perpetrators were about to begin. According to several reports, between 4,500 and 9,000 arrests were said to be imminent, as of the afternoon of Sunday 27th April. On making enquiries, we had established by late that Sunday that certain people were already being arrested – including, in particular, ‘friends’ of the arch-criminalist Dr Greenspan, who had attempted to steal $8 trillion in the past, and ‘friends’ of his evil partner in crime, George H. W. Bush Sr. However it has not been possible to verify these reports, as everything is being done below the radar.

THE NATIONAL ECONOMIC SECURITY AND REFORMATION ACT
We also understood that documents concerning the National Economic Security and Reformation Act (NESARA), hoarded by Chief Justice Roberts on behalf of the Weltkriminalgesellschaft, had been taken from him, apparently on the orders of The Queen (implemented by MI6, who have been present as noted in the United States (ever since 2006), with the authority of the World Court).

This legislation, signed into law by President Clinton in March 2000, comes into effect when it is announced; and the primary objective of the Bush-Clinton-Cheney kleptocracy, especially since implementation of the Act was deliberately sabotaged by 9/11, has been to prevent at all costs this announcement ever happening – so that their secret financial rapine could continue indefinitely.

Information about the legislation, also known as the Reformation Act, is believed to have been leaked inter alia by Mark Delmart Vreeland, the Office of Naval Intelligence operative, in June 2000 (unverified). This matter has everything to do with the stealing of the 2000 Presidential Election, and with the known fact that Bush Jr’s nickname has been said to have been ‘Temporary’, as he was supposed to have stepped down after six months, to make way for The Reformation Act, which was later rescheduled for 10.00am on 11th September 2001.

Under NESARA, Constitutional Law (the US Rule of Law) is restored and all traces of any fake virtual, or ‘shadow’ (Fascist) fraudulent governance system that lacks all legitimacy, and which has been sending so many people into a state of convoluted frenzy, are defanged. All key members of the Administration du jour are removed, headed in the prevailing context by Bush, Cheney and the entire Cabinet; specified law enforcement personnel take over relevant Government offices, and the Federal Reserve and its personnel are absorbed into a new US Treasury Bank System, as was discussed earlier in Wantagate reports.

As noted, the Reformation Act was to have been announced at 10 a.m. EDT on 11th September 2001, but the buildings were blown up shortly before 9.00 a.m. that day, murdering an unknown number of people. Thus the 9/11 abominations were much ‘worse’ than the Reichstag Fire event of 1933 to which they have been compared.

For this was nothing less than a deliberate, carefully prepared and orchestrated atrocity committed by the criminalist US ‘shadow government’ possibly with foreign criminal intelligence input, against the people and property of the United States, designed to forestall the intended Reformation Act announcements so that the corrupt banksterism carousel could continue. Actually, the PRIMARY objective of the criminalist cadres for years has been to cover up all traces of their criminality.

BITTER TRUTHS ABOUT THE 9/11 MASS MURDER OPERATION
Among those murdered on 9/11 were over 650 members of the staff of the money-broker Cantor Fitzgerald, holder of a sizeable portfolio of original derivatives contract documents, which were destroyed along with the firm’s New York personnel. The destruction of the contracts eliminated the imminent prospect and danger of part of the fraudulent finance carousel being terminated, thereby removing immediate impediments to the further creation of hidden, untaxed fiat money proceeds from stolen contracts and by means of other financial fraud operations.

The Editor does not believe the official tally of approximately 3,000 9/11 victims. His reason for this scepticism is that when he attended at our New York branch office in Midtown Manhattan in the second half of October 2001, the stench of rotting flesh was nauseating, even though Ground Zero was perhaps two miles away from our office. There could be no possibility that 3,000 rotting human corpses could have been responsible for that stench. In February 2002, when he again attended at the New York branch office, the stench had hardly abated at all, depending on the direction of the wind. It is said that Staten Island became almost uninhabitable for some time, so horrible was the pervasive smell of rotting flesh.

The Editor’s opinion is therefore that the 3,000 figure is fabricated, and that the probable number of those murdered in that abomination could very well have been as high as ten times that number. This suspicion was further supported by the impossibility of obtaining any authoritative figures on this subject at all, although we tried for several months to do so.

We recall that by November 2001, all enquiries about casualty rates and about the numbers of staff at businesses located in the World Trade Center were conspicuously leading nowhere. Further, by the end of 2001, significant numbers of US operatives who had been involved or ‘in the loop’, were reported to us to be ‘drinking heavily’. Their sleep was probably haunted, too.

The immediate, knee-jerk finger-pointing at Osama Bin Laden – the CIA asset ‘Tim Osman’, a crude character dressed in a sheet who appeared in a series of ghoulish videos thought to have been filmed in the Las Vegas area – had to be played down after he died on 26th December 2001 in a Midwest hospital, believed to have been located in or near Minneapolis.

NOTE: On 17th May 2008, The London Daily Telegraph ludicrously plastered a report that ‘Bin Laden threatens Israel on its anniversary’ across the top of page 17. The latest ‘Bin Laden’ tape continued the established propaganda norm used by the US terrorism apparat to modulate public perceptions of its ‘War on Terrorism’, notoriously a cover for the Kriminalreich’s global financial depredations, which have been destabilised by the exposures driven inter alia by this service.

The CIA and its ‘facilities’ are evidently not concerned whether one of their assets (a Paulson, a Bin Laden) is dead or alive. If he is dead, and it is ‘necessary’ to represent that he is not, for tactical or strategic reasons, they reckon that they have the capability of sustaining the necessary illusion sine die. They are assisted in this endeavour by the naivete of the ‘mainstream’ media.

The post-9/11 speed with which Bush Jr. dispatched military formations to Afghanistan, and the ongoing preparations for the unprovoked and illegal attack on Iraq, can be explained by a factor that has so far been completely overlooked. The National Economic Security and Reformation Act abolishes unconstitutional states of emergency – since it ‘restores’ the Constitution and the Rule of Law – which means that the American military, which has been deployed illegally, could no longer remain operative in Afghanistan and Iran.

By inventing these evil and destructive wars, the Bush Crime Family and its associates procured what they imagined would serve as a back-stop to prevent any possibility of the Reformation Act being imposed in a ‘worst case’ scenario. Yet they face their ‘worst case scenario’ ‘as we speak’.

Put another way, the practical realities of the massive military deployments have served the back-stop’ purpose, from the perspective of the cadre of US Luciferian operatives who perpetrated or orchestrated the 9/11 abominations, of supposedly ‘precluding’ the possibility of an announcement of the Reformation Act and the consequent ‘restoration’ of the Constitution and the Rule of Law, in any ‘normal’ situation. Yet because the Kriminalreich has since been so decisively cornered as a consequence of the endless fraudulent finance exposures spearheaded inter alia by Wantagate, the situation facing the official criminal perpetrators and their associates today is the very reverse of ‘normal’. People were being rounded up, starting on Sunday 27th April 2008.

The steady ratcheting up of Cheney’s virtual ‘wars and rumours of wars’ propaganda may have represented a coordinated operation to create a diversionary military ‘virtual/real’ standoff – to mask the truth that the criminalists are facing their days of reckoning, at last.

WHY U.S. SHIPS WERE RECALLED FROM CHINESE WATERS
Tellingly, the fact that three US aircraft carriers – USS Kitty Hawk, USS Nimitz and USS Abraham Lincoln – were reported on the 26th April to be leaving the South China Sea en route for the Gulf implied that Madame Wu’s power and Writ of Execution had finally prevailed over the Bush-centred kleptocracy, so that the show of force in the Far East, intended to exert subtle pressure on China not to act as Madame Wu has done, had both failed and had been abandoned.

The last option therefore remained the Middle East region; but with intensified pressure on senior personnel having started on 27th April, it seemed by that date that the global offensive to procure the Settlements and to repay funds stolen from China and other victims, was finally unstoppable.

Nevertheless it remained possible, in our view, that, having been decisively defeated over his serial financial scamming and thefts at long last, President George W. Bush, if allowed to remain in office (perhaps a big IF), might seek a display of machismo abroad precisely in order to mask his humiliating defeat and to signal to the jaded world that the United States remains a brutalised and recalcitrant military bully capable of, for instance, ‘annihilating Iran’ – to use the satanic words of Mrs Jezebel Rodomski Clinton, uttered in some desperation on Tuesday, 22nd April.

There is also a great deal of rumour-mongering about activation of the concentration camps, special orders to the wives of US military personnel to stock up with non-perishables, and other ‘information’, all of which appears to have one factor in common: THE INFORMATION IS ‘VIRTUAL’ For ‘virtual’ information, read ‘lies and diversionary obfuscation propaganda’.

ATTACK ON IRAQ WAS A BRUTAL BANK RAID
To recapitulate important information about the invasion of Iraq that we have published elsewhere, this was effectively a massive bank raid – the initial objective being to annexe the Central Bank of Iraq, steal its gold and currency, and then to change the management at Saddam Hussein’s ‘private’ institution, Rafidain Bank, estimated to have accumulated about $100 trillion in fiat money assets from high-yield trading programmes originally conducted, one may presume, with Saddam’s buddy George H. W. Bush and his cronies. After the gold and currency had been seized from the Central Bank, at least 100 (probably many more) special US operatives associated with that bank raid were massacred in a cynically pre-planned US operation designed to ensure that no information about the raid on the Central Bank of Iraq ever surfaced into the public domain.

The reason that the matter was not completely covered up is that information attributed to an eye-witness source became ‘attached’ to details ‘leaked’ by disgusted US personnel.

The Central Bank of Iraq was then ‘converted’ into a tame, controlled financial trading partner of Weltkriminalgesellschaft Bushe und Klintenstein, GmbH, as we have previously explained.

With trades being directed via the closed Inter Bank Settlement Fund controlled by the US Federal Reserve, hidden, untaxed trading operations could continue below the radar without scrutiny. After this service exposed this dimension of the financial corruption exploiting the Central Bank of Iraq directed from the White House, four floors at the Central Bank of Iraq were suddenly gutted by fire (in January 2008), amid rumours circulating within Iraq itself that some $800 billion of the Central Bank’s assets had ‘gone missing’, believed to have been transferred to Switzerland.

HIGH-LEVEL AMNESTY QUEST ‘NOT GOING TOO WELL’
It was on 22nd April, too, that we established that the primary high-level kleptocrats who had been trying to obtain their World Court/ICJ immunities (implying that they knew that the game was over), were encountering appropriate resistance and were being frustrated in their demands. As one well informed observer put it to us: ‘It’s not going too well for them’.

The same source stated that ‘there are spheres that will not be granted immunity’. It was on that Tuesday that Hillary Clinton, of Russian Jewish extraction, uttered her hysterical public statement to the effect that ‘if Iran touches Israel, I will annihilate it’. Seen in context, this may have been an appeal to her Israeli friends to come to her assistance, given the calamity she now faced (and we are not talking about her nauseating televised set-piece performances on the hustings).

It was also learned on that date that Madame Wu, who was in Washington all that week, having arrived there on Monday 21st April, would be insisting on the arrests taking place – and that she would not hesitate to execute her World Court Writ by seizing, on behalf of her Government, the international community and The Queen, the 20 US banks designated for seizure, along with the Fed and the Treasury, in the event of any further prevarication by the US Forces of Darkness.

In the event, as noted, it transpired that the multiple third party verification process, which was said to make it impossible for the official and bankster mafiosi to renege, meant that the sequence was taking ‘a little longer’ to complete – since for practical reasons, the necessary extraordinary third-party verification and confirmation procedures could not be commenced until Monday 28th April, as already noted. It is true that a great deal of time has elapsed since then, and that all that talk about Madame Wu exercising her Writ of Execution has disappeared out the window.

But we are still informed by our best sources that the information blackout is deliberate, because as well as covering their tracks, the criminalists are hoping that this scandal will stay confined within the Fifth Estate and in International Currency Review.

According to pre-Sarkozy French intelligence, this website collected up to 50 million readers per Wantagate report at one stage, given that 948,000 websites were taking the Wantagate reports, then disseminated by French intelligence, and that each report was attracting some 50,000 hits.

That meant that our readership was 55 times greater than that of, for instance, The Daily Telegraph. Therefore, any suggestion that this huge crisis has been contained and successfully controlled is a figment of the Kriminalreich’s disturbed imagination.

PRESIDENT KENNEDY AND EXECUTIVE ORDER 11110
International tension surrounding the delayed Settlements arose from the determination of corrupt US official and bankster cadres to continue the carousel based upon the debt-financing model that has in fact hollowed out the financial integrity of the United States ever since establishment of the Federal Reserve System in 1913.

President Kennedy understood that the then foreign-owned Federal Reserve Board (the foreign shares in which are believed to have been redeemed in 2006), had to be subsumed by the Treasury if the United States was not to wind up as bankrupt as any nation state can ever become – which, in practical terms, meant that an ever larger proportion of tax revenues would need to be allocated to servicing the colossal mountain of debt behind the US Treasury’s accounts.

Specifically, President Kennedy is believed to have reasoned that by means of a formal ‘return’ to the US Constitution, which requires only Congress to be empowered to coin, print and to regulate money, the one-way escalation of the Treasury’s background (or ‘national’) debt could be reduced because it would cease to be necessary to pay interest to the privately owned US Federal Reserve System, which has an old contract with the United States to print paper money and to lend it to the Government at interest. On 4th June 1963, President Kennedy therefore signed Executive Order 11110, calling for the issuance of $4,292,893,815 in United States Notes through the US Treasury rather than by the Federal Reserve System. On the same date, President Kennedy signed a bill changing the backing of the one- and two-dollar bills (then in wide circulation) from silver to gold, buttressing the weakened US currency’s intrinsic value.

These wise decisions appear to have been influenced by Kennedy’s voracious reading and his consequent understanding of American history – and in particular by the complaints about the Federal Reserve ventilated by Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking Committee in the 1930s. According to The Congressional Record for 10th June 1932 (pages 1295 and 1296), McFadden made the following statement on the floor of the House of Representatives:

‘Mr Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions that the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government Board, has cheated the Government of the United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt’.

‘The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government’.

‘It has done this through the maladministration of that law by which the Federal Reserve Board was established, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it’.

When President Kennedy signed Executive Order 11110, his intention was to strip the Federal Reserve of its power to lend money to the US Federal Government at interest, which has to be financed through tax revenues.

Research recently conducted by the Christian Law Fellowship through the Federal Register and at the Library of Congress, has definitively established that Kennedy’s Executive Order 11110 has never been repealed, amended or superceded by any subsequent Executive Order.

This Executive Order gave the US Treasury explicit authority ‘to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury’.

As a consequence, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were placed into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. United States Notes in $10 and $20 denominations were never circulated but were being printed by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing when Kennedy was assassinated.

Present in Dallas for the assassination on 22nd November 1963 was George Herbert Walker Bush, who is persistently suspected of having been involved in that traumatic outrage against the US Head of State and the American people, on behalf of the private money power and of Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (ongoing Nazi ‘Black’ strategic planning and counterintelligence, Dachau).

As soon as Kennedy had been assassinated, the United States Notes that he had enabled to be issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Furthermore, just five months after President Kennedy was assassinated, no more of the Series 1958 ‘Silver Certificates’ were issued, either.

They were subsequently removed from circulation.

Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes (USNs) achieved wide circulation, they would have eliminated demand for Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs), because while the USNs were backed by silver, the FRNs were backed by nothing.

Given that almost all of the $9.0 trillion of Federal debt (as inaccurately reported) has been created since 1963, Executive Order 11110 should have prevented the United States’ enormous national debt (as inaccurately reported) from reaching its current level. The US Federal Government would have gained the ability to repay its accumulated ‘background debt’ without in fact needing to have recourse to the Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to create new ‘money’ (5), (6).

The ‘Wanta Plan’, as originally conceived, would have achieved part of the same objective, by generating taxed, on-the-books windfall accruals on such a scale as to enable the Treasury to pay down its ‘background debt’ within just a few years.

However, partly as a consequence of an approach made in April 2006 to Coutts Bank in London, at the Editor’s suggestion, by Wanta Attorney Steven D. Goodwin, equipped with a Power of Attorney, and a similar approach made in the same month by the Editor of this service with a restricted Power of Attorney to Lloyds Bank, Aylesbury – both being institutions which the Editor had identified from his analysis of the Leo Wanta banking documents in the public domain as holding Wanta corporate accounts – it may be deduced that the funds held in Wanta accounts have since been repatriated.

The aggregated expanded value of the Wanta accounts, based on the original Wanta $27.5 trillion, is believed to be of the order of $300 trillion – which ‘just happens’ to be the estimated aggregate value of the long delayed Settlements, according to informed sources. (However we are also told that the actual amount of payments could be four times that figure).

CONSEQUENCE OF OUR AUTHORISED APPROACHES TO U.K. BANKS
Almost immediately after our fully Wanta-authorised approaches to the mentioned UK banks, which signalled to the Weltkriminalgesellschaft GmbH that they were no longer in control of the timetable, Leo E. Wanta travelled to California, returning with information about the ‘compromise’ $4.5 trillion Settlement that we then publicised for 23 months on his behalf and with his enthusiastic support, witnessed by successive batches of documents that were faxed by Leo Wanta to the Editor of this service, often labelled URGENT in large capital letters, as is displayed in International Currency Review. But of course, the moment that Wanta accepted this hazardous ‘compromise’, he found himself at the mercy of duplicitous US intelligence and Treasury operatives, who duly hijacked the funds and incorporated them into their own trading platform operations, as we reported. After all, payment of the $4.5 trillion was now a metter for THEM, whereas collection of the $27.5 trillion from the bank accounts, many of which we have listed, could have been masterminded by Wanta alone, if they were ‘his’ accounts, as was the case according to the documentation we have published.

THE NESARA TIMETABLE IS STILL INTACT, BUT OTHER METHODS MAY BE USED
On Monday 28th April 2008, then, verification and confirmation by the US banks in accordance with their Basel-II requirements as promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board in its undated 408-page document made available last November (7), was stated to be proceeding, driven not least by the formidable pressure being exerted by the international community and by the Writ of Execution wielded inter alia by Madame Wu, the Chinese Finance Minister. Given that it is no simple matter to manoeuvre colossal sums of money onto the books, completion was, as noted, taking longer than even Madame Wu and MI6 may have anticipated.

Obviously, given the endless deception that has characterised every stage of this crisis, we are all entitled to remain sceptical: but our very best sources still insist that matters are still proceeding correctly. If this turns out to be inaccurate, we know that certain powerful people who are in direct touch with us all the time, intend to release intelligence which will make it impossible for any of the highest-level US criminalists to escape what is coming to them. These contacts are threatening to release this information: and we urge them to do so if they believe they are still being lied to.

They should NOT allow this matter to drift into June. Send the information to us.

Assuming that a timetable was being adhered to (which did not happen), that left the month of May 2008 for the possible introduction, by due proclamation, of the Reformation Act, and the related replacement of the Bush-Cheney Administration and the Bush II Cabinet by an Interim Authority in the course of this month, allowing for the six-month period stipulated in the legislation during which an Interim Authority would rule the United States, before a general election must take place.

This would procure that the election could occur, as usual, in early November – thereby appearing to ensure a smooth transition from the corrupt, unconstitutional state of affairs that has brought the pariah United States to the verge of de facto bankruptcy, back to Constitutional Government and the Rule of Law. Since we are now approaching the half-way mark of May 2008, however, it looks as though Act Two – the refurbishment of the stables after all the dung has been thrown out – has got stuck somewhere inside the Beltway.

It would be illogical for the United States to have been compelled by the international community, with the assistance of powerful forces within the United States itself that have been seeking the restoration of the Rule of Law, to adopt the Basel-II banking reforms, allowing the US banks just 100 days within which their affairs must be reordered – without completing the job by proceeding with the Reformation Act, or some other measure capable of delivering the same beneficial outcome.

The mechanics of any such operation, we were advised, might involve a complete but temporary communications blackout, followed by the NESARA announcements, which would inform the public that President Bush, his Vice President, the Cabinet and leading officials had been removed from office, accompanied by extensive arrests (which, as noted earlier, started on Sunday 27th April), and that, under the legislation, an Interim Authority had been installed – charged with supervising completion of the return to the Constitution and the Rule of Law.

Promulgation and implementation of the Reformation Act would indeed represent Act Two of Die Meisterschwindlern. It has separately been put to the Editor of this service that Act Two might be procured ‘by other means’ and in a less obvious fashion.

We do remain to be convinced that ANYONE in the United States has the will and the guts to do what is necessary to save the Republic from this criminalist offensive, orchestrated inter alia by malevolent foreign powers, and to procure that Act One is followed promptly by a comprehensive cleansing of the filthy stables. Cleaning out the pigstie is only a first stage. The walls. floor and general structure then have to be disinfected and made good.

Making a mockery of democracy by means of a corrupt and manipulated election ‘peacock process’, amplified via the ‘virtual reality/TV’ system, hardly appears to indicate that the necessary harsh will to follow through exists inside the structures where it matters.

Even so, as the Editor left New York to return to London on 29th April 2008, he was informed that 4,000 troops were said to be guarding the President and the Vice President. This could have been interpreted as implying that their lives were in danger, which, given the immensity of their endless financial criminality, must undoubtedly be the case.

U.S. DOLLAR STRENGTHENS STEADILY ON SETTLEMENTS OUTLOOK
But, along with the steady edging up of the US dollar’s external value – attributable both to actual movements of money and to ‘informed’ Wall Street sentiment – and a general sense on both sides of the Atlantic that much more liquidity would soon become available, we were advised during the week ending on 9th May that colossal amounts of money were being moved, with the key Central Banks engaged on a huge scale, as confirmed by one of our sources with access to ‘the screens’.

The funds have had to be placed ONTO THE BOOKS, prior to the disbursement of the settlement payments, since ‘source of funds’, under Basel-II, has to be transparent – as in the US securities sector. Further, issues that the Editor and Mr Cottrell have discussed on transatlantic phone lines, have started to ‘go mainstream’, while at the other end of the spectrum, anecdotal evidence of hit squads ‘taking out’ enemies, which was always anticipated at this stage of the process – just as happened in 1992 – was being reported.

Such ‘information’, however, could not be reliably disentangled from the desperate obfuscation operations and false reports perpetrated by criminalised disinformation cadres, as they came to terms with the magnitude of the exposures that they never thought could occur.

The intended refinancing of the United States and the world economy to the tune of $300 trillion fully justifies, for instance, Gordon Brown’s ‘bet’ on a ‘significant upturn’. This was not a bet at all: for the British Prime Minister has been fully briefed on the biggest global refinancing in world history, all along, both as an intelligence operative and because of his current position.

In terms of UK domestic politics, this would mean, incidentally, that it would be premature in the extreme for the Conservative Party, which has no discernible policies apart from a sterile, mind-controlled embrace of empty-headed ‘political correctness’, to ‘bank’ on Brown and his disaffected colleagues being crushed beyond repair by recent financial and related economic developments. On the contrary, Brown’s fortunes may improve radically.

CHENEY AND OTHER CRIMINALS STILL PLAYING GAMES EVEN WHEN THE GAME IS UP
On Wednesday 7th May, the Editor of this service received a sudden telephone call asking to know the whereabouts of the Vice President of the United States. Why would Brit know the answer to this question? As it turned out, the Editor was actually able to report, within ten minutes, what he was immediately told by an informed US source: ‘Cheney is in Philadelphia and the riot act is being read to him right now’. This information was fed back to the source of the question in the United States.

By late evening UK time on 8th May, when there was still no news of the releases, the sense was that Cheney may yet again have bribed one or more parties to stall the payments. That is always possible, of course, but there was no confirmation. A further piece of nonsense surfaced to the effect that the French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, who is a key globalist ‘Dark Forces’ player, has some strife going on with respect to who is likely to be the first President of Europe, and that he insists it cannot be allowed to be Blair. We were told, nonsensically, that this latest red herring had interfered with the payments. Next, we will be told that a spider or a cockroach got inside the main giant computer at the European Operations Centre and caused an electronic glitch.

The alleged (virtual) struggle between Messrs Sarkozy and Blair over who is to be President of the moribund corpse of the European Union Collective is probably an orchestrated disinformation ploy perpetrated as usual by the Cheney lie machine – which also perpetrated the lie (on 7th May) that Bush Jr. and Cheney had received their coveted immunities: a typical Cheney lie that we discount totally, although it is always possible that Cheney has used bribery in THIS context: why would the World Court/ICJ give them immunity, which would ‘allow’ them to continue their criminal operations sine die? On 7th May, the Editor was informed, too, that Cheney’s lie machine had disseminated various further lies, such as that a certain Trustee that we know about, had been paid, which we knew NOT to be true – not least since no-one will be able to move any funds at all until everyone has been paid. In addition, we knew that the Trustee in question had not been paid. Now we were fed this nonsense about Sarkozy wanting the Presidency of Europe for himself, in lieu of Blair.

Just for the record, no position of ‘President’ of the moribund EU Collective is vacant, because it doesn’t exist. To begin with, the very prominent British businessman (and contemporary of the Editor’s at Christ Church, Oxford), Stuart Wheeler, has successfully obtained a judicial review of Gordon Brown’s nefarious decision to deny the British people a referendum on the anti-nation state Lisbon Collective Treaty, so that Britain’s position vis-à-vis this Pan-German entrapment device to destroy Britain’s statehood is ‘up in the air’.

Secondly, the Irish have not yet voted in their referendum on the notorious Treaty, while the Upper House in the Czech Republic has serious doubts about the Treaty’s legality and has referred the matter to its Constitutional Court. The same has happened in Germany, of all countries. Therefore, ratification of Lisbon is a long way off, and may be aborted altogether – like its ‘predecessor’, the European Constitution Treaty.

Accordingly, we can dismiss this latest red herring for what it is – namely, yet another lie from the Cheney disinformation camp, which in any case just happens to turn the truth of the matter on its head. For, contrary to what was implied, M. Sarkozy has, after a slow start, been pressing for the conclusion of the Settlements, in support of Her Majesty The Queen (who wowed him and his new wife at the Palace), Madame Wu, and all the other distinguished representatives of the financial community with the single exception of the recalcitrant United States.

LIKELY POLITICAL FALL-OUT IN AMERICA FAR FROM CLEAR YET
It is much harder to read what the political outcome in the United States of any actual completion of the Settlements is likely to be. Among reasons for this are the following:

• The ongoing, wall-to-wall intensity of perverse disinformation, diversionary reporting and wilful deception perpetrated by the criminalised US intelligence sector under Operation Mockingbird and the manipulation of the Fifth Estate (the Internet sector) (8) to mask the headlong involvement of criminal intelligence in fraudulent finance, makes it almost impossible for ordinary Americans to discern truth from CIA lies. Until this monstrous Intelligence Power is defanged, the American Republic will remain in great danger, and the political system will continue to be managed and rigged for the exclusive benefit of the kakocracy and its intelligence community manipulators.

• At the time of going to press/this posting, it was unclear how comprehensive the obvious defeat of the US criminalist cadres was likely to be. Are the stables going to be fumigated, or are they just going to be tidied up for routine Department of Agriculture inspections, enabling the Settlements to be surreptitiously exploited, under the cover of a ‘front operation’ that will be compliant with the Rule of Law, to kick-start a further round of fraudulent finance – as implied by the aforementioned denial of the Editor’s request for a written confirmation that all Wanta transactions would comply with the Rule of Law? On the one hand, the informed expectation that none of the perpetrators will be allowed to ‘get away with it’, is encouraging.

But on the other hand, while Mrs Clinton, the candidate of the Dark Forces, remains on the ticket for the Presidency (not much longer, surely, unless they ‘do something’ to Mr Obama, which would not be beyond ‘them’ at all), the criminalist cadres can be relied upon to rest their rapidly vanishing hopes of ‘business as usual’ on this Jezebel becoming President.

• Likewise, it remained unclear at this posting whether the massive stables cleansing job (Act One of Die Meisterschwindlern) would remain half done, with the second phase, or Act Two – formal and decisive restoration of Constitutional Governance and the US Rule of Law – realised, for instance, through an imminent announcement of the Reformation Act and its consequences, or by means of some other beneficial measure implemented by a corrupt and self-interested Congress motivated by a wish, finally, to cover its own tracks by acting at last in the interests of the American people.

‘ACT TWO’ MUST NOT BE FUDGED OR POSTPONED, OR THE CRISIS WILL RECUR
Unless this, or a measure to the same decisive and lasting effect, is implemented in the immediate future, final completion of the financial releases and Settlements will be liable to refinance not only the US and world economies, but the battered Weltkriminalgesellschaft, as well.

Which would mean that although America’s ‘Main Enemy’ – Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst, Dachau, the Nazi strategic deception continuum driven by its old slogans ‘we shall build the Thousand-Year Reich upon the ruins of the United States ’ (9) and ‘For us the war never ended’ (‘Für uns ist der Krieg niemals vorbei’) (10) – has been severely wounded, it may yet survive to regroup and repeat its mad Luciferian offensive to procure revenge for its catastrophic defeats in two World Wars.

The de facto refinancing the US and world financial economies must not be allowed to provide new cover for a simultaneous and surreptitious refinancing of the Weltkriminalgesellschaft, its corrupt and amoral ‘Black’ intelligence community controllers and those pathetic and misguided Luciferian globalist ‘Dark Actors Playing Games’ who vainly seek to set themselves up as gods purportedly controlling the future of humanity. It remains touch and go whether America will pull itself together in time to prevent these despicably evil people regaining the initiative, which they lost, we believe, partly – or even mainly – thanks to Wantagate.

* ERRATUM:The information that George H. W. Bush lives in The Woodlands area of Houston was obtained direct from The Washington Post. An impeccable source has informed the Editor (12th May) that Mr Bush Sr. lives in River Oaks, which is close to the Downtown and Galleria area. The Woodlands is 35-40 miles North of Houston.

Notes and References:
1. ‘Containing Systemic Risks and Restoring Financial Stability’, Global Financial Stability Report, International Monetary Fund, April 2008.

2. See ‘G-7 demands immediate US discipline and compliance: World community stands up to Bush crime network’, report on this website, Saturday 12th April 2008, filed by the Editor overnight from the IMF/World Bank Press Room in Washington, DC.

3. London Archaeology, Spring 2008, Volume 11, Number 12, pages 312-318.

4. ‘Election Pain for Brown as Tories march on’, lead report, front page, The Daily Telegraph, Monday, 2nd May 2008: final two paragraphs.

5. Report by Anthony Wayne, for Lawgiver.org, The Christian Law Fellowship, April 2008.

6. Executive Order 11110:

Amendment of Executive Order No. 10289 as amended, relating to the performance of certain functions affecting the Department of the Treasury. By virtue of the authority vested in me by Section 301 of Title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:

• SECTION 1: Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended (a) By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j): “(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of Section 43 of the Act of May 12, 1933, as amended (31 USC 821 (b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denomination of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption, and (b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof;

• SECTION 2: The amendment made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made.

JOHN F. KENNEDY, THE WHITE HOUSE, June 4, 1963.

7. Basel II Final Rules, Federal Reserve Board Open Board Meeting, November 2, 2007, 10 a.m. EDT. On page 1, this document states: ‘DATES: This final rule is effective [INSERT DATE]’. As we reported on the website report dated 17th April 2008, ‘Global Refinancing Settlements Intelligence Update: US dragged kicking and screaming into Basel-II mode’, ‘The United States was dragged kicking and screaming like a spoilt child in overdue need of a diaper change into the Basel-II mode with effect from 12:01 am on Monday 14th April, as expected’.

‘US institutions now have 100 days to reorder their affairs to comply in all respects with the Basel-II requirements, as agreed within the international financial community. This represents a massive defeat for the two-headed Luciferian Government of the United States led by criminal operatives President George W. Bush Jr. and his ‘Himmler’ character, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, and their cynical criminalist ‘Box Gang’ co-conspirators’.

8. It has just been revealed that two particularly egregious disinformation platforms – the Sorcha Faal reports purporting to represent postings from inside the Kremlin, but which are revealed to be perpetrated by a US military intelligence operative working with an Irish source (i.e., for the Clinton component of the criminalist ‘Box Gang’), and the website www.whatdoesitmean.com, are American deception operations.

That website has been exposed by the research given below. A list of suspect and intelligence-controlled websites is given on page 512 of the Editor’s work, ‘The New Underworld Order: Dark Actors Playing Games: The Global Fantasies of the Geomasonic Illuminati’: Edward Harle Limited: see the books section of this integrated website.

Exposure of a subversive CIA-controlled website:

Domain Name: WHATDOESITMEAN.COM
Registrar: REGISTER.COM, INC.
Server: whois.register.com
Referral URL: [link to www.register.com]
Name Server: NS.SERVINT.COM
Name Server: NS2.SERVINT.COM
Status: ok
Updated Date: 13-Nov-2007
Creation Date: 12-Nov-2003
Expiration Date: 12-Nov-2009
Current Registrar: REGISTER.COM, INC.
IP Address: 207.58.165.85 (ARIN & RIPE IP search)
IP Location: US (UNITED STATES)-VIRGINIA-MCLEAN
Record Type: Domain Name
Server Type: Indeterminate
Lock Status: ok
DMOZ: no listings
Y! Directory: see listings
Web Site Title: WhatDoesItMean.Com
Secure: No
E-commerce: No
Traffic Ranking: 4
Data as of: 27-Jul-2005
[link to www.networksolutions.com]
[link to www.internic.net]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 195267 (OP)
Data sent to the Editor: 5/4/2008 4:00 AM
Re: Top CIA Agent Killed Trying To Protect D.C. Madam
IP Location: US, McLean, Virginia. Contrary to popular belief, the CIA headquarters is not located in Langley, VA, but in the Langley suburb of McLean,Virginia.

9. ‘We shall build the Thousand-Year Reich on the Ruins of the United States’, one of the rallying cries formulated by the German Geopolitical Centre (Abwehr: Nazi counterintelligence) in Madrid, discovered in Nazi documents seized by the Allies in the final days of the Second World War.

10. ‘For us the war never ended’ (‘Für uns ist der Kreig niemals vorbei’) was accompanied by the elaboration: ‘and as is known, in war, everything is permitted’. This slogan was a key theme of the so-called ‘Madrid Circular Letter’, a document circulated by the Nazi intelligentsia from the German Geopolitical Centre, Madrid, in the early 1950s. The Editor believes that such intelligence, which would have alerted US policymakers to the likelihood that the Cold War had provided the Nazis with long-range cover, was suppressed by the State Department.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

THE WANTA PLAN’S DEALS WILL BE 100% TRANSPARENT

COMPLIANCE WITH FULL DISCLOSURE STANDARD RECONFIRMED

Tuesday 18 March 2008 02:56

UPDATE, 25TH MARCH 2008: This report is remaining in situ given its central importance in the prevailing context. Secondly, contrary to the assertions of many who read this report when it was originally posted, this service has NOT opted out of the necessary task of exposing the financial corruption and other key dimensions of the World Revolution and its Luciferian perpetrators. But as indicated, this report must remain in place for now, focused upon the central issue, until such time as we have been able INDEPENDENTLY to ascertain that the necessary safeguard measures envisaged in the call for an Oversight Panel or Trusteeship have been duly acted upon.

No-one can criticise this proposal without self-exposure, as must be evident to all concerned.

HOWEVER, we understand that certain recalcitrant circles may be RESISTING THE EDITOR’S OWN UNCHALLENGABLE PROPOSAL FOR AN OVERSIGHT PANEL, which, self-evidently, stands in the way of any ongoing intention to steal and/or to take the money right back off-balance sheet in order to facilitate corrupt ‘business as usual’. In thereby indicating any opposition to this basic proposal, anyone who adopts such a stance will reveal what may be going on behind the scenes. We cannot imagine that anyone ‘in the know’ could be so foolish: but then again, simple common sense would appear to be at a premium, so intense may be the apparent continuing determination to sidestep the Rule of Law, in spite of what we have published since June 2006 in its defence.

It’s been too cushy for so long, some people can’t imagine life without corrupt ‘business as usual’.

So, will they ‘go straight’? Or are they manoeuvring to preserve the decadent status quo?

What would HM The Queen have to say about any de facto misapplication of her funds?

These considerations and questions are appended here in order to assist anyone who may be having difficulty understanding plain English.

SCOPE FOR FRAUDULENT TRANSACTIONS ‘PRECLUDED’ BY STATEMENT

NEW OVERSIGHT SUGGESTION TO PROVIDE ASSURANCE FOR ALL PARTIES

A DESCRIPTION OF U.S. SECURITIES MARKET SAFEGUARDS

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for ‘Wantagate’ reports since April 2006.

• Please Make a Donation to help fund Christopher Story’s ongoing financial corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial corruption and global financial crisis in history. This website has been calling the shots, because of the hijacking of Wanta’s Settlement.

AN IMPORTANT PREAMBLE; THIS IS THE 100TH WANTAGATE REPORT
This is the 100th, and also the LAST, Wantagate report, dealing with The Wanta Plan and the Wanta Settlement. The Editor feels that, since 2003, he has now done all he can to procure the finalisation of Ambassador Wanta’s long overdue payment, and has a few remarks to make on this subject at the end of the main section of this report. We have forced the issue as far as is practicable.

In the process, we have massively dislodged, and thrown into total disarray, the financial criminal rats, who are in such distress due to their own open-ended stupidity and greed that the corrupt President of the United States has had the gall to ask Courts and the Legislative Branch for the OKAY to steal what he terms ‘the tax money’ on the Settlements, so that he can bail out his cronies who have lost their shirts in the Carlyle debacle, for which the Bush Crime Family and their gaga criminalist associates are themselves responsible. Talk about shooting onself in the foot.

By way of clarification, the Ambassador has requested the Editor of this service to publish no NEW reports specifically on The Wanta Plan until further notice, given the greatly heightened sensitivity of the situation; and of course the Editor concurs with this reasonable request, not least because he has always stated that, as a ‘special friend’ of the Ambassador (to employ his own words), he will always cooperate, as requested, to assist Mr Wanta and his colleagues towards closure.

Future reports in this series will focus on the ongoing financial corruption crisis, the corruption in the European Union Collective’s structures, other chronic World Revolution issues, and relevant geopolitical matters, with our usual continuing acute concern about the deteriorating conditions in Britain and the United States: ‘The Main Enemy’. The antics of the world’s worst financial criminals, occupying the highest offices in the United States, will remain an inevitable preoccupation. But the focus will henceforth cease to be SPECIFICALLY the Wanta Settlement and the endless convoluted problems that the criminalist operatives have systematically placed in the way of its fulfilment, as they seek to steal the whole lot for themselves and their cronies, which is what is happening.

That issue will now become more clearly part of the broader scope of our reports. But of course, we will remain concerned about the Settlements as a whole, given their prospective impact, and their currently delayed impact, on the world economic and financial environment.

U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: MISPRISION OF FELONY:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

• BOOKS: ‘The Red Terror in Russia’, by Sergey Melgounov, is published by Edward Harle Limited and available via this combined website. It describes what the Dark Forces pulled off in Russia, and what they may have in mind for the United States and Britain (a.k.a. ‘the Main Enemy’) if we do not pull ourselves together. See also the Editor’s 740-page book ‘The New Underworld Order’, for the detailed background on the World Revolution crisis that we are all living through.

AMBASSADOR WANTA CONFIRMS THAT THE WANTA PLAN IS ON TRACK
At 6:05pm UK time on 17th March 2008, Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta confirmed that the Wanta Plan – to use the phrase that both the Ambassador and Mr Cottrell agreed (on the same date) was coined by the Editor of this service, in June 2006 – will proceed in accordance with the information that is in the public domain, upon economic receipt of the funds.

He added that the Wanta Plan ‘is being accelerated’.

The Editor, who has served as rapporteur for Wantagate by invitation, read this statement by the Ambassador to a working associate of the Ambassador and Mr Cottrell, at about 6.40pm UK time, and it was agreed to the associate’s complete satisfaction.

WANTA PLAN REPORTEDLY ADOPTED BY THE GROUP OF SEVEN LAST YEAR
It has just been confirmed to us by impeccable sources that The Wanta Plan was adopted by the Group of Seven (G-8) financial powers at their Meeting in Northern Germany last June. The Plan was adopted in accordance with the Prospectus reconfirmed by the Ambassador above.

NO DEVIATION FROM THE AGREED 100% TRANSPARENCY STANDARD
The Editor of International Currency Review and this service accordingly understands from the above that there is to be no deviation whatsoever from the agreed arrangements that have been promulgated on an arms’-length basis through these Wantagate reports since the beginning of this crisis, which have thus reported the position accurately throughout.

He further understands from the above that the necessary checks and balances will be applied at all times, consistently with the 100% transparency standard referenced by the above statement.

This is consistent with our assertion, under the heading ‘WANTA PLAN CALLS FOR 100% TRANSPARENCY’ contained in our Wantagate report dated 17th August 2006 (1), which stated:

‘The Wanta Plan, which provides for total transparency and for all transactions to be properly taxed and conducted on the books, threatens to expose all these untaxed illegal past and ongoing US transaction scams – with devastating consequences for the perpetrators under the present and past three US Administrations’. Given the collapse of Carlyle during the week ending 14th March, and the parallel collapse of Bear Stearns’ share price to $2.0, this prediction is being fulfilled.

It is also consistent with the further statement in that same long-since published report dated the 17th August 2006 under the stark heading ‘AMBASSADOR WANTA’S TREASURER ORDERS THE $4.5 TRILLION TO BE CREDITED’, which elaborated (2):

‘On 14th August 2006, Mr Michael C. Cottrell M.S., the Executive Vice President and Treasurer of Ambassador Wanta’s corporation, instructed in writing that the Secretary of the Treasury, Hank M. Paulson, order the immediate transfer of the $4.5 trillion for the Securities Account of Ambassador Wanta’s corporation (AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.) at a prominent Wall Street securities firm (3) where, in response to the Due Diligence documentation submitted by Mr Cottrell, it has qualified for, and is in possession of, the necessary US Securities Account Number with the major institution that is concerned. Copies of Mr Cottrell’s instructions were conveyed to Mr James R. Wilkinson at the Treasury and to President George W. Bush’.

WANTAGATE REPORTS ON WANTA PLAN DETAILS JUDGED TO HAVE BEEN ACCURATE
Given the above, it follows, then, that the descriptions contained in these documented Wantagate reports of the outline financial arrangements for the implementation of The Wanta Plan, have at all times remained consistent with the restricted information provided by the Ambassador that is in the public domain, and in correspondence faxed to the Editor by the Ambassador himself. In the course of a pleasant Sunday afternoon briefing at a Staten Island hotel last November, the Editor was informed further on the detail of The Wanta Plan in the presence of Michael C. Cottrell, M.S.

Along with the Ambassador, Mr Cottrell has been honoured with special diplomatic status by Her Majesty The Queen and is consequently in possession of Diplomatic Passport Number 60160425.

Although no restrictions were placed upon the use of the information provided to the Editor by the Ambassador on Staten Island, the Editor has chosen not to publicise any of the facts in question, pending further guidance from the Ambassador at some appropriate stage in the future.

NO MISREPRESENTATION OF WANTA PLAN FACTS AS PRESENTED BY THE EDITOR
As an investigative financial journalist and publisher, the Editor of International Currency Review has a professional responsibility to our subscribers, to the readers of the Wantagate reports, to the international financial community, and to Her Majesty The Queen, to procure that all information provided for public consumption through our media conforms to the briefings provided to him, to any relevant back-up documentation, including Court documents, and to normal UK professional investigative standards requiring due diligence in the pursuit and checking of information. In the light of the Ambassador’s statement and confirmation above, he believes that he has complied fully with his responsibilities in this context, and that, accordingly, it cannot be represented at any time in the future that any misrepresentation of The Wanta Plan has marred these Wantagate reports.

In our Wantagate report dated 3rd March 2008, the Editor expressed his personal concerns at circumstances that might be facing the Ambassador. Those concerns, to which the Editor, as a friend of the Ambassador, was entitled, were publicised exclusively because the Editor had been unable to communicate with Mr Wanta for some months due to the fact that, as he was informed only on 17th March 2008, Ambassador Wanta had been subjected to a ‘gag order’, at least pending completion of the Settlement, in respect of communications with Mr Christopher Story – a new fact of which the Editor of this service was never informed until 17th March, contrary to the information published in our report dated 8th December 2007 [International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 3 & 4, pages 523-560] which gave the impression, based upon what we were told, that the White House had ordered communications with this Editor to cease for only 48 hours. [SEE NOTE BELOW].

NO DEVIATION FROM THE WANTA PLAN TEMPLATE
For his part, Mr Cottrell advised the Editor on 16th and 17th March 2008, consistently with the Ambassador’s statement cited at the top of this report, as follows:

1. He, Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., Executive Vice President and Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., who, as stated, enjoys special diplomatic status in this overall context, conferred upon him along with the Ambassador, by Her Majesty The Queen, is not a party to, does not agree with, and wishes it to be clearly understood that he will not collaborate with, any Wanta Plan arrangements which deviate in any way from the 100% transparency standard referenced in our Wantagate report dated 18th August 2006, and subsequently.

2. It is Mr Cottrell’s professional assessment that any variation of the advertised arrangements will contain the potential for entrapment in a situation whereby it may be represented that he and the Editor of this service may have been parties to misrepresentation and a deception. As Mr Wanta’s statement above confirms, this is not the case.

3. In this context, Mr Cottrell points out that for at least the past 15 months, we have consistently cited, as a warning to all concerned, at the foot of these Wantagate reports, the relevant applicable US Statutes, the 1933/34 Securities Acts regulations and the legal position in connection with public misrepresentation of material facts, fraudulent concealment of material facts, the tort of Fraud in the Inducement, Theft by Deception, Fraudulent Conveyance and the implications of obfuscation when representing material facts concerning prospective financial transactions for general public consumption. All of this information is reproduced yet again, as usual, at the foot of this report. We have also frequently cited, as we do at the top of this report, the US Misprision of Felony Statute, which is applicable to all in the United States who wilfully ignore evidence of this endless official US corruption and fail to report it in accordance with that law.

4. Mr Cottrell adds that IF the agreed-upon existing Joint Venture/Wanta Plan arrangement with his own firm is to proceed, given the massive proportions of the Lee E. Wanta Settlement, ‘I, Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., President of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., require an oversight panel or judge in order to ensure the proper and transparent expenditure and investment of the Lee Wanta funds in accordance with the reconfirmed arrangement whereby they are submitted to the Morgan Stanley Securities Account per the instructions given by both Ambassador Lee E. Wanta and myself’ as was detailed in our Wantagate report dated 18th August 2006, cited above.

Prior to the availability of Ambassador’s statement given at the top of this report, Michael Cottrell further informed the Editor on 17th March 2008 as follows: ‘I refuse to participate in The Wanta Plan if it does not conform precisely to what was agreed and has been advertised through your reports with the Ambassador’s collaboration. If the Wanta Plan does not now precisely conform to what was previously agreed and confirmed in writing, then it is a deception, and I will have no part in it’.

NATURAL CONCERNS FOR TRANSPARENCY EXPRESSED
Diversion of any part of the $6.2 trillion Wanta Settlement funds, of which a substantial proportion was originally provided by Her Majesty The Queen, would represent one or more clearly fraudulent transactions, with which the Ambassador and Mr Cottrell could not be associated, and with which the Editor, as rapporteur by invitation, cannot associate himself or his media either.

None of the parties named here can agree, be associated with, or lend their support to any such variation or conversion of the funds, if that may ever be intended or were to take place.

In this respect, Mr Cottrell informs us that he is greatly encouraged by the Ambassador’s timely and welcome confirmation at the top of this report. This statement is made here for the public record.

THE EDITOR’S FINAL PRACTICAL SUGGESTION, FOR CONSIDERATION
The Editor would elaborate, for the consideration of ALL concerned:

• Since the Wanta payment indeed consists of such a large sum of money, it might be appropriate and in the obvious interests and for the protection of ALL the parties concerned, for the suggested oversight panel – consisting, for instance, of Department of Defense Internal Affairs and Treasury Compliance Officers, a Judge or the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the World Court, to be appointed so as to ensure the proper and uniformly transparent expenditure and investment of the funds on the basis that there is to be no variation at all of The Wanta Plan structure, as referenced above. This suggestion is not to be construed as implying distrust on the part of this Editor of any of the parties concerned, or that there may be any cause for concern on that score. But given what we all know about our human nature, this is a simple, constructive suggestion, to which no-one can possibly object, and which would be of continuing benefit, comfort and assurance to everyone. He understands from the above that Mr Cottrell concurs with this elaboration of his own observations.

Pending his ‘compromise’ Settlement, the Ambassador’s de facto ‘lien’ upon the entire corpus of his original $27.5 trillion (and upon 100% of the ‘assets’ generated through subsequent unlawful trades and operations using his funds) remains unchanged.

Variation of the promulgated arrangements (which the Ambassador precludes in his statement at the top of this report) may not constitute an effective legal settlement and thus release of the claim to and ‘lien’ on the entire corpus.

The Editor of International Currency Review is entitled to make this observation since his job is to report the situation for the benefit of our subscribers and website readers.

THE 100TH WANTAGATE REPORT IS THE LAST
In conclusion, the Editor states again that, as this is the 100th Wantagate report, he intends to take this opportunity to sign off with specific reference to the Wanta Settlement, since he believes that he has completed his mission to assist the Ambassador to the best of his ability, a task upon which he embarked when he made available $35,000 of his own scarce private funds to make it possible for the sum of $30,026.97 to be paid to the Wisconsin Department of Corrections by way of Court-ordered ‘Restitution’ which procured the shortening of the Ambassador’s unlawful probation by five years and two weeks – from the old probation termination date of 28th November 2010, to the 14th November 2005, the date when, following this payment, the Ambassador was granted an Absolute Discharge by Mr Matthew J. Frank, the Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections.

(Information about the Editor’s own funds in this context had to be publicised, with the agreement of Ambassador Wanta, when it became apparent that the matter could not be explained clearly for international public consumption without releasing this information).

As explained in our Wantagate report dated 6th August 2007 (5), in particular, the Editor has established that these funds were misapplied by the Wisconsin Department of Revenue, an unresolved and scandalous state of affairs, although the Editor’s payment did procure the shortening by 5+ years of the Ambassador’s unlawful probation status.

• The Editor was told on 17th March 2008 that the (retired) Judge who took Mr Wanta’s case has recognised that he himself was misled, and has informed appropriate authorities accordingly. It is believed that this development may be a consequence of the Editor’s Misprision of Felony letter to the retired Judge’s successor, Judge James Martin, sent from New York last October. It is further understood that severe consequences, at last, will ensue for those implicated in this abomination against the Ambassador in the State of Wisconsin and that, following these developments, the case will be sealed. The Editor regards this final point as an abomination within the abomination itself.

At the same time – under the loan Promissory Note signed by Lee E Wanta on 9th June 2005 and the Escrow Agreement signed by Lee Emil Wanta Attorney Steven D. Goodwin, as the Trustee for the Editor’s money – the Editor’s own loan funds plus 7% per annum, extended for two years, should have been repaid at the end of the two-year period (11th June 2007) but were not repaid.

The tiresome detail is added here for context, and for the record. This matter provides the Editor with added standing in addition to his now discharged responsibilities as arms’-length rapporteur by invitation, charged de facto with assisting with the resolution of the Wantagate crisis.

Since this is the 100th Wantagate report, and given the Ambassador’s wishes and that the Editor has yet again been advised that the matter may be on the verge of final resolution [sic], no further specifically Wantagate-oriented reports will be posted on this website.

The still forthcoming bumper special issue of International Currency Review (Volume 33, #s 3 & 4) will present all the information on Wantagate that is in the public domain, with the exception of certain materials that have been published in earlier issues of the journal (6). The presentation will further contain analytical material placing this matter, which is of such millennial importance, in the context of the global financial and economic crisis which erupted following the impasse over The Wanta Plan and Settlement that prevailed from June 2006 onwards.

The Editor (8) (9) will not respond to further enquiries on Wantagate matters or related subjects, but his office will process all requests for copies of Wantagate issues of International Currency Review, as advertised, and of course for all other books and publications published by our group.

NOTE: In a report subsequent to the 3rd March report, the Editor stated that Ambassador Wanta was in good shape, that communication with him was possible, which is true (for those with access: not for readers of this service: PLEASE). The reason for this assertion was that the Editor had been inundated with emailed messages from good people all over the United States and elsewhere who expressed concern about the Ambassador, as a direct consequence of the 3rd March 2008 report.

But upon reading this information, certain official circles in the United States experienced a conniption of uncontrolled proportions, interpreting this insertion by the Editor in the light of the ‘gag’ order referenced above, ABOUT WHICH THE EDITOR KNEW NOTHING UNTIL 17TH MARCH 2008, as indicated. This is a classic indication of official power going completely MAD.

The OBVIOUS way to handle the position would have been for the Editor of this service to have been INFORMED of the ‘gag’ order (is it a written document, or verbal?) which HE WOULD, FOR HIS PART, HAVE RESPECTED. What is the basis for the implied assumption that the Editor of this service will not cooperate if asked to do so by the Ambassador? He was never asked.

Who helped the Ambassador out of his unlawful probation, at great cost? Such ludicrous paranoia on the part of law enforcement indicates, truly, that these people are out of their minds.

References:

(1). See also International Currency Review, Volume 31, #s 3 & 4, Fourth Quarter 2006, page 125.

(2). See also International Currency Review, Volume 31, #s 3 & 4, Fourth Quarter 2006, page 126.

(3). Morgan Stanley, New York.

(4). It will be recalled that the original $4.5 trillion provided by Chinese parties for the exclusive benefit of Ambassador Leo/Lee Emil Wanta [see the text of Petition for a Writ of Mandamus in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria: relevant Case Number 1:2007cv00609-TSE-BRP, filed 20th June 2007: per Wantagate report dated 24th June 2007 for the background details, bearing in mind that untrue statements made to and in court represent perjury] were effectively ‘stolen’, and that replacement funds of over $6.2 billion were provided inter alia by the Bank of England/ HM The Queen and initially transferred into the hands of newly merged Bank of New York Mellon under contract from the CIA’s primary institution, Bank of America, from 19th July 2007, ostensibly for onward remittance to make the Wanta payment [see the Wantagate report dated 27th July 2007].

The subsequent FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE operation included the episode, exposed in the Wantagate report dated the 30th August 2007, when Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., was advised by the Bank of New York Mellon to contact the ‘Wire Room’, which ‘couldn’t find’ any trace of records concerning the $4.5 trillion payable to Wanta.

Through this fraudulent conveyance of the $6.2 trillion ‘replacement’ funds LOANED BY THE QUEEN that was now being held within the Bank of New York Mellon, BNY Capital Markets, the bank’s own subsidiary, was then immediately in a position to proceed with new Leveraged Debt Obligations (LBOs) and Collateralised Debt Obligations (CDOs) OFF BALANCE SHEET, back out through the closed Federal Inter Bank Settlement Fund in order to generate OFF-BALANCE SHEET accruals for individual office-holders at the White House, inside the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve, and the associated known giga-criminalist operatives and bandits.

In other words, the ‘replacement’ funds provided by the Bank of England and the Chinese were again diverted prospectively so as to generate new illegal off-balance sheet, untaxed windfall accruals, contrary to the instructions of the originators, of whom we understand that the primary source was Her Majesty The Queen herself. Integral to this fraud was the fact that the Bank of New York Mellon was supposed to have been nothing more than a conduit, which had GUARANTEED delivery of the $4.5 trillion to Leo Wanta’s AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., corporate securities account with Morgan Stanley within Citibank, where the Wanta funds were, however, finally identified as being unlawfully held up within Citibank [see Wantagate report dated 4th October 2007].

(5). See also International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 3 & 4, pages 147-202.

(6). The Wantagate issues of International Currency Review are as follows:

• International Currency Review, Volume 30, #s 2 & 3 (‘The Green Book’), Winter 2004-2005.
• International Currency Review, Volume 31, #s 3 & 4, Fourth Quarter 2006.
• International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, Third Quarter 2007.
• International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 3 & 4, Second Quarter 2008 (7).

(7). This huge ‘closing’ Wantagate issue is in preparation but has been somewhat delayed pending complications surrounding the Wanta Settlement matter which are nothing to do with the Editor of this service. Since no further Wantagate reports will now be posted following this 100th Wantagate report, further publication delays are not expected. The Editor’s decision on all the content of this mega-Wantagate issue is final and it is confirmed that it consists of material that has, for the most part, been in the public domain for some time. No new Wanta Plan information is being added, and the analytical material will be built upon further private research conducted recently by the Editor. International Currency Review is a private subscription service and is available on a subscription-only basis, with occasional provision made for special offers of particular issues, at the Editor’s discretion. Requests for copies of the forthcoming mega-issue should be addressed to us via the CONTACT US facility on the website, or by telephone or fax to the coordinates displayed thereon.

(8). The Editor stresses that he is not a party to advertising and interpreting for the benefit of the international financial community any Wanta Plan arrangement which varies one iota from the 100% transparency standard, based upon operating within the securities market environment, that has been consistently advertised in these reports, sourced inter alia upon key written documentation faxed to the Editor by the Ambassador. The Editor has no related financial claim whatsoever and has no financial interest in this matter other than the recovery of his private $35,000 loan plus the interest due. He is not, and cannot be construed as being, a party to any variation of The Wanta Plan (as promoted ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’, to cite the remarks of Her Majesty the Queen to the G-8 Meeting in northern Germany in June 2007), in our Wantagate reports.

(9) Given the Ambassador’s confirmation at the top of this report that The Wanta Plan will proceed in accordance with the advertised specification, it cannot be maintained by enemies of The Wanta Plan and its implications (as some may wish) that the Editor may have been used to deceive the international financial community concerning The Wanta Plan, and neither can it be maintained that the Wanta Plan has been a deception.

Any variation of The Wanta Plan as promulgated and recconfirmed by the Ambassador’s statement at the top of this report would constitute a fraud perpetrated against this service, and through this service, against our subscribers, Wantagate report readers, the American people, the US Treasury itself, the United States, Her Majesty the Queen (if we may now say so), the international financial community generally, all the main European financial powers in particular, the key European central banks, China and Japan and their respective central banks and financial authorities (who are loyal subscribers to International Currency Review), and all other interested parties including of course the multiple Trustees and payees to which the other settlement arrangements apply, and which are nothing to do with the Lee E. Wanta Settlement except that none of them can take place until the Ambassador’s de facto ‘lien’ on his stolen funds is released through his taking economic receipt of his unlawfully hijacked and criminally delayed ‘compromise settlement’.

It is hardly necessary to explain that any such double-cross could not be implemented without the instigation and collaboration of the notoriously arch-criminalist Bush Family, the co-conspiring Clintons and other players who have been interfering in these matters, and thus bringing the whole world economy to the brink of calamity ever since Wantagate began.

In this connection, we have been advised by several knowledgeable sources that the intention has been to ‘crash the system’ before making the Wanta payment. Indeed, this ‘fact’ has been explicitly stated by the sources, to be the case.

Such a cynical abomination represents gross treason, unprecedented criminality and a display of impeachable offenses so grave as to be without any historical precedent. Likewise, the self-same perpetrators of any deception over the Wanta Settlement, if it is to proceed contrary to the precise specification of The Wanta Plan, will be seen to be traitors to the United States and to the American people, as well as being the specific Black authors of their financial and economic suffering – not to mention that of the Rest of the World.

LEGAL RECAPITULATION FROM REPORT DATED 30TH AUGUST 2007:

FINANCIAL FRAUD:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:
• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scienter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:
• ‘FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• “To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:
• ‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”. Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition.

REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS NAMED IN WANTAGATE REPORTS HAVE BEEN AND MAY CONTINUE TO BE IN BREACH, AND APPLICABLE IN THE U.S. SECURITIES SECTOR:
• NASD Rule 3120, et al
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• l 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers
and transmittals of funds, et al.

LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HIJACKED
AMBASSADOR LEE WANTA’S SETTLEMENT AGREED IN MAY 2006:
• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war

ADDENDUM: THE SECURITIES SECTOR

THE U.S. REGULATIONS THAT SHOULD APPLY
Excerpted from Wantagate report dated 22nd January 2007:
International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, pages 343-365.

In the United States there are very strict regulations governing the marketing of securities.

Registration is a sine qua non and, without exception, the Ponzi-style securities scams that have devastated the lives of so many, are not registered.

The fact that they are often operated via pools of funds handled by banks is intended to provide a veneer of false legitimacy that masks the underlying reality that these schemes are ALL illegal: see our Wantagate report dated 26th December 2007 on the gross financial frauds underlying the so-called ‘Sub-prime’ crisis [also: International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 3 & 4, pages 589-606].

The use of a corporate securities account in the United States with a broker/dealer acting in a fiduciary capacity presupposes and provides for the following safeguards:

• The funds in such an account are not counted within the assets of the broker/dealer institution, whereas the funds in a bank account are counted within the assets of the bank

• This means that whereas a bank can attach the funds of a depositor, funds held in a corporate securities fiduciary account as described CANNOT BE ATTACHED.

• This provides much better security for the funds than is available in a bank. Given the extreme notoriety of US banks as exposed through these Wantagate reports, this key consideration is of paramount importance, all the more so in the case of a very large settlement.

• Accordingly any deviation from the corporate securities arrangements must be unacceptable, quite apart from the fact that such deviation from the securities account arrangements referenced in our Wantagate report dated 18th August 2006, would be fraudulent.

• In the securities sector, ‘source of funds’ must always be divulged. No payments lacking such information can be deposited at any time. This guarantees 100% transparency.

Prior to ‘Black Tuesday’ (29th October 1929), the US Federal Government was not involved in licensing the issuance or sale of stocks, bonds, or any other form of security, since this was considered to be the domain of State regulators under the “Blue Sky” laws.

This term refers to the plight facing any gullible investor who discovers that the securities he has purchased represent nothing of value other than the blue sky above. These laws require that any security that is offered to investors must be certified by a State agency, which must be supplied with the necessary comprehensive financial information.

In 1933, Congress passed the Securities Act of that year, incorporating the ‘Truth in Securities’ law which superseded the State “Blue Sky” laws with respect to the registration, issuance and the prospectus identifying the security being offered to the public for purchase.

The primary focus of this legislation was its registration procedures, and the prohibition of false representation and fraudulent sales practices. In 1934, the Securities Exchange Act established the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to oversee both the registration process and the antifraud provisions of the 1933 Securities Act.

The Maloney Act of 1938, amending the Securities Act of 1933, created the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD). This legislation promoted the organization of member securities dealers under the umbrella of a self-regulating organization (SRO), supervised by the SEC to ensure the application of a code of ethics and its enforcement throughout the United States.

Members of the NASD are known as Broker/Dealers since they represent both clients who buy and/or sell securities, as well as representing themselves, as principals, when underwriting and/or selling a stock or bond issue directly to the public. The NASD is the only firm operating under the Maloney Act, and its responsibilities include the following:

• Nation-wide field inspections of member firms.

• Centralised computerised surveillance of the trading of NASD Automated Quotations posted by its sister corporation NASDAQ.

• Enforcement of Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations, as well as the NASD’s own rules applicable to its members.

• Review of underwriting arrangements for securities offered to the public.

• Coordination of, and cooperation with, the Securities and Exchange Commission, other Federal agencies, and the States.

• Performance and monitoring of qualification examinations required to be passed by personnel employed by members. The Registered Principal of a member firm must pass the Series 24 (General Securities Principal) and the Series 7 (General Securities Representative) Examinations conducted by the NASD, and must pass the written procedures and oral interview, before assuming this position within the member firm.

The member firm’s Registered Financial Operations Officer (see below) is equally responsible with the Registered Principal for the firm’s financial reporting to the SEC and the NASD, for the accurate record-keeping of the firm’s Net Capital Account, for all securities trades and customer accounts and correspondence, and for advertising and sales literature issued by the firm. The Registered Financial Operations Officer must pass the Series 27 (Financial and Operations Principal) and the Series 7 (General Securities Representative) Examinations conducted by the NASD, and must also pass written procedures and oral interview prior to assuming this position within the firm.

A third official, the Registered Representative, who is licensed and authorised to purchase and to sell stocks, bonds, options, limited partnerships, tax sheltered mutual funds, and variable annuities on behalf of customers or the firm itself, must have passed the Series 7 (or the General Securities Representative) Examination, and must furthermore be registered with the firm as an Authorised Representative. All licensed Representatives must have passed the Series 63 (Uniform State Law) Anti-Fraud Examination, and be registered with each State where the firm will be operating (1).

(Since 1966, the United Kingdom, Canada and Japan have adopted the same regulations with respect to licensing, and the licenses issued in these countries correspond with those of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the NASD).

UNREGISTERED FRAUDULENT SECURITIES SCAMS
Securities and ‘lending programs’ operating along Ponzi Scheme lines promoted clandestinely inter alia by corrupt elements of the criminalist US intelligence community (including the OMEGA OPS scams) comply with none of these stringent regulations and requirements and are therefore, by definition, ALL ILLEGAL IN THE UNITED STATES.

The question therefore arises: why are these illegal schemes so widespread, having given rise to a colossal constituency of the American ‘broken hearted’, who have been scammed in one way or another but who cling to the hope, like Rip van Winkel, that they, their family trusts or their restless associations of ‘the scammed’, will finally be paid out one sunny day far out into the future?

The generic answer to this question is that the criminalised fraudster elite, led by the crooks controlling and inside the intelligence community, have installed their own corrupt operatives within and in control of the enforcement institutions, including the SEC.

As a consequence, blind official eyes have been turned to what has been going on, the securities regulations have not been enforced with respect to such illegal Ponzi frauds, and the old system whereby anyone involved with trading securities was blackballed for life if caught engaged in irregular activities, has been moribund since the 1970s. When an uncorrupt SEC Commissioner tried, quite recently, to enforce the regulations, he was removed from his post on some typically trumped-up pretext or other. In other words, the wolves are in charge of the chicken coops.

So the enforcers are, as matters stand, co-conspirators in the despicable, proliferating intelligence community-driven Ponzi Game operations that have devastated an unknown number of American families – with the proceeds channeled through corrupt participating banks into offshore accounts.

Apparently the volume of illegally stashed ‘funny money’ held in offshore accounts since all forms of exploitation of the ‘fiat money’ system were taken over by the State-Controlled Mafia – or, even more accurately, the Intel-Mob-Controlled State – runs into the hundreds of trillions of dollars: and long after the Wanta Settlement, the consequences of this criminality will continue to mess up the international financial system, as we ought by now to be glaringly evident (March 2008).

For the moment, grieved by the plight of the victims, the Editor has researched our files for an article we published some years ago entitled ‘How Charles Ponzi pulled it off: Making a fine art out of a pyramid fraud’. It appeared in International Currency Review, Volume 27, Number 3, December 2001, and represents a condensed summary of the original, classic Ponzi Pyramid Scheme, plus a potted history of its cynical immigrant Italian originator, Charles Ponzi:

THE ORIGINAL PONZI SCHEME EXPLAINED
Charles Ponzi, an immigrant from Italy to Boston, MA, made millions of dollars for a brief period, by exploiting his shrewd observation that while national currencies were fluctuating wildly in 1920, just after the end of the First World War, the Universal Postal Union (UPU) issued coupons which were always worth a given amount of postage stamps.

In those days, European refugees were flocking to the United States, Canada and Brazil; and often, their only contact with their families and friends back home was an occasional letter, enclosing a few dollars. The Universal Postal Union arranged to move the millions of refugee letters, business documents and messages across national borders by issuing Postal Reply Coupons.

You bought a Postal Reply Coupon in your country of residence, and enclosed it with your letter. Your mother, once she had received the letter, exchanged the Postal Reply Coupon for stamps at her local post office.

Charles Ponzi told friends in Boston: ‘Everybody’s heard of the Postal Union. They print coupons like these I’m holding here: Postal Reply Coupons. You can send a letter home, or anywhere in the world, with these coupons. And you can trade this coupon for a stamp in any country. I send my mother coupons with every letter that I write home’.

‘Now, in cooperation with certain large businesses in our city, I am making a fortune on the Postal Reply Coupon. Stocks are too risky. Forget it. And bonds, what are they paying? Maybe around six percent? Savings accounts at Tremont Trust, they’ll give you four and a half cents on the dollar. Give them $100 and they’ll give you back $104.50. I can beat that into the ground’, Ponzi insisted, beating his cane against the floor. ‘My investors get 50 cents on the dollar. Place a hundred dollars with my Securities Exchange Company, and you take out $150. Put that $150 in, you’ll get back $225. That’s right, in six months, you can more than double your money’.

How could he pay 50%, when banks couldn’t even manage 5%? ‘Exchange rates’, Charles Ponzi explained. ‘Every morning I go down and check to see how the lira is doing against the dollar. Usually you get five lire for a dollar. This morning I checked, and with the war just ended, it takes 20 lire to the dollar’.

While currency rates were bouncing around like popcorn, Mr Ponzi explained, the Postal Reply Coupon always bought one stamp. Here’s what I do’.

‘I senda my cousin in Parma, Italy, $1.0. He exchanges the dollar for lire. With the 20 lire (2,000 centesimi), he can buy 66 Postal Reply Coupons (worth 30 centesimi each, the cost of a letter-sized stamp in Italy). Back in the United States, each of the coupons buys one stamp, face value five cents. I redeem all 66 coupons for $3.30 worth of stamps. The magic happens in the exchange rate. In America, my dollar buys 20 Postal Coupons. But if I exchange the dollar for lire, and buy the coupons in Italy, then return and buy the stamps in America, I get $3.30 worth of stamps for that same $1.0. My profit margin is 230%’.

‘Yeah, but $3.30 worth of stamps is still stamps’, complained an attentive but sceptical listener.

‘I know’, said Ponzi. ‘So I sell the stamps at a 10% discount through my contacts with the larger firms downtown. Deducting the discount, I’ve gota $3.0 cash now, from the $1.0 that I started outa with. Now, let’s say, I got that dollar from you. I will pay you back your dollar, plus 50 cents interest. Since I just sold $3.0 worth of stamps, I have a dollar and 50 cents for myself. I’m going to spend a third of that on my offices and processing overheads, and a third on commissions and bonuses to my sales people; then, ladies and gentlemen, I’m going to pocket the other third and take my wife for a stroll’.

This was the essence of the original Ponzi scheme. Note that in this description, Ponzi starts out by exploiting the fluctuations of exchange rates, and the lack of arbitrage; and note that, by the end of the explanation, he is simply offering 50% interest, which he pays out to his claimants out of the additional funds he has received from other investors who are likewise anticipating a 50% return on their investments, within a short space of time.

The germ of the idea was derived from the foreign exchange market; but once Ponzi has realised that people will pour money his way if they are promised a 50% return, he can simply abandon his elaborate explanation (‘his ‘prospectus’) of the exploitation of exchange rate fluctuations and the tedious task of shipping, receiving, handling and exchanging Postal Reply Coupons, which gave him the ‘easy money’ idea in the first place.

In other words, his sales pitch is no more than a now redundant, expendable illustration – a false prospectus which disguises the fact that he is really promoting a pyramid selling operation. For he has realised that all his investors care about is receiving 50% on their money.

How this is to be achieved does not appear to concern them. Anything sound familiar here?

By December 1920, Charles Ponzi was matching old money with ever larger amounts of new money. In May 1921 alone, almost $500,000 of new money poured into the Securities Exchange Company – as 1,500 or more new customers, lured by the 50% yield offered through advertisements, sought their share of the huge profits they thought would be forthcoming at minimal risk.

The Ponzi office premises now bulged with fat stacks of dollar bills.

THE FLOOR STARTS TO GIVE WAY BENEATH HIM
But problems started to arise when Joseph Daniels filed a lawsuit alleging that he had helped to found the Securities Exchange Company (SEC) with a loan of $230 worth of furniture plus $200 in cash. Daniels had indeed provided the beaten-up desks that had been offloaded into the dusty office, and had let Mr Ponzi have $200 to spark interest in the Postal Coupons. It wasn’t just a loan, Daniels maintained, now that Ponzi was drowning in cash. ‘We were partners. I put up capital and property’. On 2nd July, Mr Ponzi was handed a demand for $1.0 million.

The Boston Post telephoned, and Mr Ponzi told the reporter that he had indeed bought furniture from Mr Daniels, but that he had never received any money for investment from him.

But when the newly installed banking commissioner for Massachusetts, Mr Joseph Allen, read the newspaper, he wondered: ‘Where did Charles Ponzi come from? Who are his associates? How is he managing to double people’s money?’

Allen asked Ponzi to popa rounda to his office, for an interview.

The Securities Exchange Company did not describe itself as a bank, nor did it offer any banking services. Therefore, in the absence of a complaint – and none had yet arrived – the Commissioner had no jurisdiction to examine Ponzi’s business. At the interview, Ponzi explained the curiosities surrounding Postal Coupons, pointed out that money chased money, collected his black hat and coat, doffed his hat, and bid Mr Allen goodbye.

But Richard Grozier, city editor at The Boston Post, had always thought that Charles Ponzi’s scheme was fraudulent; and to initiate what he suspected would be the inevitable débacle, he now elicited a comment from one of Boston’s leading citizens, Clarence Barron, the owner of Dow Jones & Co. and The Wall Street Journal.

At the end of July 1920, The Boston Post carried a front page story entitled: ‘Clarence Barron questions the motive behind Ponzi’s scheme’.

Theoretically, Barron admitted, you could indeed turn a profit on the UPU coupons. But that was the only truth buried within the operation. You could never earn more than a few thousand dollars, not just because of the trouble involved in offloading the stamps and tracking the various conversions driving the process, but because there simply were not enough coupons available.

France, Romania and Spain had just abandoned the scheme, a few months earlier. A cursory check with the UPU showed that they had a few hundred thousand dollars’ worth of their old coupons in circulation – nowhere near the $10 million or $15 million Mr Ponzi claimed to be trading. So where was Ponzi getting his coupons from? Furthermore, the US Postal Service had announced, on 2nd July 1920, that Postal Reply Coupons would no longer be redeemable in lots larger than ten.

So how was Ponzi converting his coupons into stamps?

Finally, Barron asked, if Ponzi is doubling everyone else’s money, why does he keep his own funds in regional banks? The Boston Post knew that Ponzi kept millions of dollars on deposit at seven or eight New England banks, and that the accounts were ballooning. How could a man who was paying 100% interest every 90 days, put up with drawing just 4% on his holdings? Barron concluded:

‘Right under the eyes of our Government, Mr Ponzi has been paying out US money to one line, with deposits taken from a succeeding line’ (another bank).

All of a sudden, all the doors which had flown back on their hinges at the sight of Mr Ponzi, were slamming tight shut. The Massachusetts District Attorney ordered Ponzi to cease and desist. His customers demanded their money back, and Ponzi was eventually jailed for Federal mail fraud, then deported. He wound up destitute in South America (2).

Addendum references:

(1). Condensed with kind permission from ‘Elite Power and Capital Markets’, by Michael C. Cottrell, M.S.: Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science, Administration of Justice Department, Mercyhurst College, 13 February 2002, pages 42-44.

(2). ‘How Charles Ponzi pulled it off: Making a fine art out of a pyramid fraud’, International Currency Review, Volume 27, Number 3, December 2001, pages 51-52.

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001

WANTAGATE OBFUSCATION: ‘OPERATION DOUBLE-CROSS’

WANTA UNDER PSYCHOLOGICAL ATTACK AND DURESS

Monday 3 March 2008 22:36

THE AMBASSADOR IS BEING BLACKMAILED BY THE U.S. INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY

WHOLE WORLD AT RISK AS WANTA FACES UNPRECEDENTED INTEL PRESSURES

ALL HIS FUNDS WILL BE STOLEN, AS WILL EVERYONE ELSE’S, IF HE WAVERS

HE WILL BE RELIEVED OF HIS MONEY, HUNG OUT TO DRY AND THEN….

‘BAIT AND SWITCH’ TREACHERY TO DECEIVE LEE WANTA FOR THE END-GAME

UNDERWORLD INTELLIGENCE KLEPTOCRATS SEEK PAYMENT INTO THEIR DIRTY HANDS

POSSIBLE INTENTION TO ‘CHANGE THE SUBJECT’ WITH A DIVERSIONARY MIDDLE EAST WAR

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for our ‘Wantagate’ reports since April 2006.

• The white panel below NEWS gives details of our intelligence titles as they are published.

• FORTHCOMING WANTAGATE ISSUE OF INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW: We are preparing a very extensive issue of the financial journal in which every stage of this crisis since June last year will be displayed. This issue will be mailed to subscribers worldwide in the first quarter of this year, and will provide a permanent record, which cannot be expunged, of the multiple twists and turns of this historically unprecedented criminalism crisis, with every sordid detail recorded both for immediate further enlightenment, for future study, and for posterity.

Not a single facet of this hideous crisis has been left out of the record, so that no attempt to cover up what has been going on, is possible. Subscribers will receive their issues under their current arrangements. Others who wish to receive this special issue should use the Contact Us facility on this website to ask for details and specify how many copies of this huge report/issue they would like to receive. Book early while stocks last. We will not be sending free copies: details on request. Order your copy EARLY! This is such a huge undertaking that we have to restrict the print run.

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing financial global corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Our Wantagate reports have been calling all the shots, given the hijacking of Wanta’s Settlement.

• This is the 97th Wantagate report: well over a million words to date.

• BOOKS: ‘The Red Terror in Russia’, by Sergey Melgounov, is published by Edward Harle Limited and available via this combined website. It describes what the Dark Forces pulled off in Russia, and what they may have in mind for the United States and Britain (a.k.a. ‘the Main Enemy’) if we do not pull ourselves together. See also the Editor’s 740-PAGE book ‘The New Underworld Order’, for the detailed background on the World Revolution crisis that we are all living through.

• Note: Kindly keep on not shooting the messenger. The following report is based upon our best information and belief. If matters turn out differently, or the timeframe changes, as has occurred since 9th February, this will reflect developments AFTER collection of the intelligence contained herein. We have flies on walls all over the place, but sometimes they may be on the wrong walls, or the right walls at the wrong time. Abusive, rude and anonymous emails are forwarded to a separate box and are held with the option of exposing their provenance should we so decide. Which we may.

U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: MISPRISION OF FELONY:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

ABOUT THIS REPORT
Note: For convenience, this report is effectively divided into two sections.

• The first part of the text, after the introduction, summarises findings as culled from our own special sources, hopefully denuded of disinformation.

• The second section, termed the Main intelligence Section, contains special information which reveals the full overall picture of the ‘bait and switch’ treachery which is taking place.

Comments on the character and expertise of Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., the Executive Vice President and Treasurer of Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta’s Commonwealth of Virginia-based corporation, AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., are based upon the Editor’s personal observations and considered assessments over a period of several years.

‘OPERATION DOUBLE-CROSS’ TO STEAL AND KEEP ALL THE MONEY
According to multiple sources special to this service, a final struggle is under way in the United States to terminate The Wanta Plan, to stall implementation of the Basel II banking reforms, to steal all Ambassador Wanta’s money, and to capture and keep the entire estimated $400 trillion of funds that the long-delayed Settlements are to deliver overall, in history’s biggest-ever refinancing.

This report is intended to explain what the criminal forces have in mind, how they intend to achieve this evil objective, and how they are placing Ambassador Wanta under duress in order to double-cross him and all concerned with the resolution of this historically unprecedented crisis. They may also be intending to carry out this putsch under cover of military operations in the Middle East.

We call this US intelligence offensive ‘Operation Double-Cross’. Its purpose is nothing less than the seizure and final unlawful retention of ALL the funds, and the defeat of those who have been standing up to the organised criminal cadres that control the American Government at the highest levels, inside the intelligence community, and in the banks. In the process, they may intend to deprive Ambassador Wanta of everything he has fought for these past 15 years, before finally disposing of him altogether, as they did his Chinese partner, Howie Kwong Kok, back in 1992.

If ‘Operation Double-Cross’ succeeds, the world will be plunged into a crisis of unprecedented proportions, as we first predicted in our posting dated 2nd September 2006. There are ominous immediate signs of this happening. For instance, the FDIC has a list of 76 US banks which it expects to fail at any time, as they are operating below minimum capital requirements. Military sources tell us that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) itself is on the brink of collapse.

In Oakland, CA, a house which sold for $420,000 in 2005 is on the market for $119,00, and is not expected to achieve the listed price. In Detroit, there are several homes on the market for $100.

THE MAIN TARGETS OF ‘OPERATION DOUBLE-CROSS’
We will be explaining how the Bush and Clinton Crime Families, and their criminalised associates inside the US intelligence community and the banks, intend to double-cross the following parties:

• Ambassador Leo/Lee Emil Wanta (with his unwitting cooperation, under duress).

• Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., the US securities industry expert who is Executive Vice President and Treasurer of Ambassador Wanta’s Virginia-based corporation AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., incorporated by the Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission on 20th May 2004.

• Her Majesty The Queen.

• Christopher Edward Harle Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher and the writer of all the Wantagate reports posted on this website, who loaned Ambassador Wanta $35,000 of his own scarce private funds for two years, ending on 10th June 2007, which have not been repaid. The Trustee of these funds is CIA Attorney Steven Goodwin of Richmond Virginia.

• The Reagan-Mitterrand Protocol and other leading country payees.

• The 160 countries whose representatives were reported last week to be still in New York.

• The IMF/Prosperity Programme payees and all the other ‘Tier’ payees

• The World Court.

• The US Supreme Court, which has thrown in its lot with the World Court, having indicated to the Bush Crime Family that quote ‘we are not going down with you’ unquote.

• The US Treasury.

• The American people.

PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE AGAINST AMBASSADOR WANTA
The tactical characteristics of this ‘Operation Double-Cross’ can be described as a psychological warfare attack upon the cohesion of Ambassador Wanta, Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., their closest associates (and by further arms’-length association, the Editor of this service), with the objective of ensuring that ALL the funds can be stolen FOR GOOD.

The DIABOLICAL feature of what is intended is that it has been calculated that the ‘best’ way to seize the entire $400 trillion-odd is to have the international community unwittingly pay the funds, so to speak, directly into the hands of the organised criminal cadres. Once that happens, so the criminal mentality behind ‘Operation Double-Cross’ has concluded, no-one will ever be able to do anything about it. It will be ‘game, set and match’.

Ambassador Wanta is being used as the patsy to ‘make this happen’. He is being placed under duress by the intelligence community and made to agree to steps which will guarantee the folding of The Wanta Plan, the stealing of all his settlement funds, and the shelving of Basel II – as well as the unlawful seizure of all the other monies.

Ambassador Wanta’s alleged willingness, under duress, as reported by multiple sources, to go along with the malevolent (see below) scheme that has been put to him, jeopardises the Wanta Settlement funds, which will be stolen; and this will ensure that the entire world will experience the worst conceivable outcome, which Wanta has spent that past 15 years struggling to prevent.

• Quite simply, Ambassador Wanta is being blackmailed.

Moreover this intelligence putsch is being perpetrated at the very moment that the International Monetary Fund, the US military, the World Court and the Group of Nine++ financial powers are engaged, in lock-step, in seeking to force payment of the Settlements, failing which the G-9 have threatened to reimpose sanctions against the United States (see below). The intention may be to pull off this coup under cover of aggressive military operations in the Middle East, which could easily escalate into a World War, according to several foreign international sources.

At the very least, US sabre-rattling in the Middle East region may be intended to deflect the G-9 from applying sanctions at a time of heightened international tension. That’s what we believe.

THE FATE OF THE WHOLE WORLD LIES IN THE HANDS OF LEE EMIL WANTA
The parties listed above are now in extreme danger of procuring the Settlement payments, only to watch as THE WHOLE LOT IS STOLEN FOR GOOD. There is only ONE PERSON IN THE WORLD who can stop this happening: AMBASSADOR LEE EMIL WANTA.

MR WANTA: YOUR DECISION NOW WILL LITERALLY MAKE OR BREAK THE WORLD
This report is therefore aimed at ensuring that common sense prevails at the very last moment, as the Ambassador has it within his power either to launch the whole world onto a sustainable path of prosperity for a generation, or else to ensure an international catastrophe by allowing the funds to fall permanently into the hands of the criminal forces that have destroyed the past 15 years of his life and stolen all his money.

Right now, we understand, he may be making the WRONG DECISION. His position may well be delicate, but taking millennial decisions under duress is not a good idea. In this Editor’s opinion (and experience), when under duress, the right thing to do is the right thing. This normally has the effect of forcing the enemy back on its heels.

It is the Editor’s experience that when one stands up to those who have malevolent and devious designs, and may even (in this case) be engaged in blackmail, they are usually so shocked that they ‘back off’. Michael C. Cottrell’s principled stand against them all these years has had precisely that outcome, as has the Ambassador’s own brave resistance to the crude abominations to which his treacherous colleagues have subjected him. Now, therefore, is NOT the time to CAVE IN.

Of course they are putting Mr Wanta under duress. That is what they do. And furthermore, they do this when they calculate that the victim is at his most vulnerable – which may be the case right now.

Mr Wanta, a religious man, will recall the following Scripture:

‘When Jesus had spoken these words, he went forth over the brook Cedron, where was a garden, into the which he entered, he and his disciples.

And Judas also, which betrayed him, knew the place: for Jesus oft-times resorted thither with his disciples.

Judas then, having received a band of men and officers from the chief priests and Pharisees, cometh thither with lanterns and torches and weapons.

Jesus therefore, knowing all things that should come upon him, went forth, and said unto them, Whom seek ye?

They answered him, Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus saith unto them, I am he. And Judas also, which betrayed him, stood with them.

As soon then as he had said unto them, I am he, they went backward, and fell to the ground’.
John, Chapter 18, verses 1-6

THE SIMPLE CHOICE FACING THE AMBASSADOR
Ambassador Wanta faces a simple choice right now. It is no exaggeration to assert that the decision he makes will affect the future of the whole world.

• He can continue with the existing Wanta Plan structure based upon the SECURE corporate securities account with the world-ranking US securities expert Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., as his Executive Vice President and Treasurer, which will ensure that trading, financing and special projects for the benefit of the American people can go ahead, finally, as planned – so that the catastrophe that faces the United States due to the depredations of the corrupt and deceitful criminalist cadres is overcome thanks to those massive taxed on-the-books windfall tax payments that will accrue to the US Treasury, and to the parallel implementation of the huge refinancing operation for the United States and the whole world that will be unleashed.

• IF he removes Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., as Treasurer, and replaces him with an inferior product, or changes the existing settled arrangements, as is believed to be intended, under pressure from his untrustworthy intelligence sector advisers – the Wanta Plan will be folded, the Settlements will never take place, ALL the money will be stolen, the United States will stumble into a depression, the world economy will reel into semi-coherence, inflation will move into double digits everywhere, and Ambassador Wanta will be seen to have been the cause of this catastrophe because HE TOOK THE WRONG DECISION. That would be a tragedy without parallel in modern history.

And the Editor of this service, who operates at arms’ length, will then have to portray Ambassador Wanta, who could have saved the world from catastrophe, as the tragic patriot who took the wrong decision under duress and pressure from his unreliable intelligence community peers.

AMBASSADOR WANTA: PLEASE WAKE UP TO WHAT THEY INTEND TO DO
We will elaborate below how we arrive at this alarming conclusion.

But first, the message, therefore, is this:

• MR WANTA SHOULD STICK WITH THE ONLY TRULY TRUSTWORTHY AND RELIABLE FRIENDS AND ASSOCIATES THAT HE KNOWS, WHO HAVE NEVER DOUBLE-CROSSED HIM AND NEVER WILL, AND HE SHOULD PULL BACK AT ONCE FROM THROWING IN HIS LOT WITH THE DUPLICITOUS COLLEAGUES WHO HAVE DOUBLE-CROSSED HIM IN THE PAST, WILL DO SO AGAIN – AND THIS TIME WILL NOT ONLY STEAL EVERYTHING, AS BEFORE, BUT WILL FINISH HIM OFF ONCE AND FOR ALL, AS THEY DID HIS FRIEND AND COLLEAGUE HOWIE KWONG KOK, JUST A YEAR BEFORE THEY TOOK WANTA HIMSELF DOWN IN JULY 1993.

• If he likes the taste of rat poison (used in the murder of Howie), then presumably he should follow the advice of these Pied Pipers.

But not otherwise.

• Ambassador Wanta therefore holds the fate of the United States and the whole world in his hands. If he continues, under this duress, down the path that he appears to be contemplating, according to our multiple reports, he will destroy everything that he has fought for since being taken down in July 1993, and he will be double-crossed and hung out to dry with nothing except a wasted life to show for it. They couldn’t care less.

• Why are we publishing this harsh information? Because Ambassador Wanta, who is reported by the sources as being under pressure from these operatives, may not be listening. According to what we understand, he may be taking tainted advice from the very type of people who scammed , exploited, stole from him and abused him before.

He may be falling for their syrupy blandishments, which amount to a form of blackmail. He should, in the Editor’s opinion, change his approach IMMEDIATELY, before he is manoeuvred into watching everything being destroyed – because if he follows this dubious double-cross course, into which he appears to be sleep-walking under duress, he himself will be double-crossed and he will regret what he has done for the rest of what will then remain of his life (which may not be a lot). We are merely reporting what we have observed from previous cases known to us: and we are not the only observers who are concerned at this turn of events.

• Nor should the Ambassador be concerned that any change of course from the perilous direction in which he is now walking, would make him look weak. Who cares what these people may choose to think? He has been abused and trampled on, subjected to numerous attempts on his life, and yet has miraculously escaped the very worst outcomes. He should not worry about what these people think of him: that is THEIR problem, not his. He should stick to the existing arrangements and not yield to these dangerous people. He may consider them to be intelligence community colleagues, but surely that in itself should be enough to ensure that he understands that they are likely to be setting him up. After all, that is what they do. They have no other modus operandi.

The Ambassador knows all about ‘bait and switch’. Yet it appears, according to our reports, that he cannot perceive when this standard Luciferian technique is being applied to HIM. If he falls for the trick this time, in the face of the effective blackmail operation against him, the consequences for himself, the United States and the whole of humanity will be terrible, as this report explains.

THROWING AWAY EVERYTHING THAT HE HAS FOUGHT FOR AND ENDURED
Yet here he is, as reported to us, toying with throwing everything away just because the scheming, criminalised intelligence classes don’t like Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. The reason they don’t like Mr Cottrell, is very SIMPLE: he has called their criminal bluff, has stood up to them, has exposed their unlawful operations, and has never yielded an inch.

The Ambassador, who spent 40 days in Mr Cottrell’s company last fall (incurring a huge hotel bill which Mr Cottrell is having to pay), should reflect, before it is too late, that his understandable anxiety to bring this matter to a conclusion and to ‘get back into the game’, at any cost, is risking not only his Settlement (which these people will steal) but also the future of the United States and the whole world. We cannot believe that he does not understand this reality.

The Editor therefore appeals urgently to Mr Wanta – who has benefited not only from the huge hotel bill incurred by Mr Cottrell (believed to be of the order of $14,000), but also from the Editor’s loan funds of $35,000 which ought to have been repaid on 11th June 2007, have not been repaid, and have been stolen by the Wisconsin Department of Revenue – to think again.

If he makes the wrong decision now, as by all accounts he is doing or is about to do, under duress, he may wreck his chances of retaining custody of his agreed-upon funds, will lose control of them because he will be wallowing in the corrupt banking sector which relieved him of his original $27.5 trillion, and will therefore be unable to proceed inter alia with any of the projects agreed with Mr Cottrell’s Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. under their Private Joint Venture Agreement dated 30th December 2005, and with fresh projects for the benefit of the American people, whom he seeks once again to serve. The projects in question have already been delayed for years.

No doubt unsolicited advice from a rank outsider may be unwelcome: but, given the catastrophic state of affairs that will ensue if the funds are stolen for good and the refinancing of the United States and the world economy, backed by Basel II, does not begin immediately, what other choice does this Editor have? Our job is to monitor the evolution of the international financial economy for the benefit of our subscribers: and since the Editor has had a specific role to play in this crisis for several years, this is all the more reason why his unsolicited advice must be placed on record.

The Ambassador, no doubt under advice, severed his contacts with the Editor several months ago. We understand his position. However, one doubtless ‘unintended’ consequence is that the only way that the Editor’s considered assessments can be placed before him, as in the past, is by means of the electronic and printed word.

WHY AGREED PROJECTS FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL COLLAPSE
Projects for the benefit of the American people, agreed upon under the Private Joint Venture, and others that have been planned, will collapse if Mr Wanta now succumbs to the blackmail pressures being exerted upon him to amend the existing business structure – because new arrangements that he is reported to be contemplating are designed to deceive, double-cross, scam and terminate him once and for all. At the very least, he may be taking an extreme risk in following the primrose path down which his advisers are reported by our several sources, to be pushing him.

Assuming that the Ambassador’s familiar common sense finally prevails, he should not be deterred from pulling back, due to the publicity generated by this report. The reason he should not hesitate, and should not be concerned about what his advisers are saying and proposing, is that their real objective is to deceive him, as he was deceived and taken down before.

It was not for nothing that Colonel Dana Wilcox said to the Editor of this service, when we were together in Alexandria last October, that ‘Leo Wanta is his own worst enemy’. This assessment, unfortunately, appears to be correct.

THE STEALING OF THE EDITOR’S WANTA LOAN FUNDS
While we are on the subject of corporate matters, Attorney Steven Goodwin, the Secretary of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., is also Trustee of the Editor’s $35,000 Escrow Agreement dated 14th July 2005 and of the Promissory Note referencing the Editor’s loan funds dated 9th June 2005. The private loan was extended at 7.00% annual interest for two years, ending on 10th June 2007, but has not been repaid. That is an outrage.

The Editor accordingly holds both men accountable for these loan funds and will manifestly require reimbursement. He does not agree with the cynical comment made to him by Mrs Linda Fanton, who previously assisted the Editor and the Ambassador before she abandoned both, that ‘you can wave goodbye to that money’. All concerned are hereby placed on notice that such cynicism and financial irresponsibility will not be tolerated. British people don’t buy into that attitude.

In this connection, the Editor’s British accountant, Douglas Heydon, wrote on 10th December 2007 to Mr Goodwin, of Goodwin, Sutton & Duval, PC, 5516 Falmouth Street, Suite 108, Richmond, Virginia 23230, enquiring about the Editor’s funds and information about their disposition.

Mr Heydon wrote again on 18th January 2008; and as of this date he had received no response. We understand that Mr Goodwin has been ‘instructed’ not to reply. Whether he has been so instructed or not, he is the Trustee of the Editor’s funds and as an Attorney he is expected to respond to enquiries from a qualified accountant. Failing to do so is both unprofessional and reprehensible.

No doubt the duplicitous CIA intention behind this arrangement was to provoke the Editor of this service to ‘turn on’ the Ambassador for the return of his funds with the agreed-upon interest: that is the sort of dirty trick these people play. Unfortunately for whoever Mr Goodwin’s handler may be, this is not going to happen. Goodwin is the Trustee and he must perform. The two cited and rudely unanswered letters from Mr Heydon will now appear on pages 198-199 of the forthcoming massive Wantagate-only issue of International Currency Review, which will be mailed worldwide to existing official, banking sector, investment and new subscribers in the near future.

THERE ARE ONLY TWO REASONS WHY ANY SETTLEMENTS PROGRESS HAS BEEN MADE
Given what this Editor has done to prise the Ambassador out of the hole that his colleagues had ruthlessly discarded him into, any deviation from Mr Wanta’s previous settled loyalties in favour, under duress, of a new ‘switch’, will send signals to all the relevant quarters that he cannot be trusted. That would be a sad let-down after all that he has done for America and the West.

We know that such an impression would be unwarranted. The reason he was ‘taken down’ in July 1993 by the organised criminal cadres led by the Clinton and Bush Crime Families was precisely that he would not ‘go along’ with their criminal operations. He would not contravene US law.

There are just TWO reasons why progress has been made with ALL the Settlements since the Editor took the risky action to pay $35,000 to haul the Ambassador out of his unlawful probation:

• The adamant refusal of Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. to succumb to pressures to deviate from ‘the regs’, and his principled adherence to the Securities regulations and the Rule of Law.

• The 98 Wantagate reports which the Editor of this service has voluntarily written, so far free of charge, pro bono publico, posted and published in order to complete what he started when he made the $35,000 available for the salvation of the Ambassador.

INACCURATE CHARACTER ASSESSMENTS
No doubt another cynical calculation in certain minds may have been that Christopher Story would never write a report such as the present one, because he wants his $35,000 back with the agreed-upon interest. Wrong. ‘What I have started, I will finish’, to coin a famous phrase.

Likewise, it may, we surmise, have been calculated that Mr Cottrell will go along with the scheming behind his back which will leave him and his family vulnerable to the identical. typical US criminal intelligence ‘bait and switch’ stitch-up that may be intended for the Ambassador, in due course (explained below: how they will do it). Wrong. We understand that the position is that if Mr Cottrell is not trusted, which is absurd, then the game is over.

Our close observation of this man for several years, during which time he has never deceived the Editor, is that he is a man of the highest integrity and principle – which the criminal classes detest – and that this is precisely why the Ambassador MUST retain his services.

If he does not, just because the criminalist cadres don’t like him, as a man of principle unlike them, Mr Wanta will rapidly be scammed and will sink without trace.

No doubt the intelligence community doesn’t like the Editor of this service either: but that is their problem. If they could see that their endless lies, double-dealing, scamming, double-crossing, ‘bait and switch’ behaviour, and all the other unfettered abominations that pour out of the George Bush Center for Intelligence (a.k.a. Exploitation) in Langley, were cumulatively counter-productive, and that they stink in the nostrils of the whole world, especially following these Wantagate exposures of their serial corruption, they might start to dig themselves out of the ordure in which they are wallowing. The world’s dreadful opinion of them is of their own perverse making.

LANGLEY WILL HAVE TO BE RENAMED AFTER THIS HELLISH BUSH ERA
For starters, the CIA will have to consider renaming Langley, because, all of a sudden, they won’t want to be tarred with Bush’s brush any longer.

Fancy falling so stupidly for the DVD’s biggest, boldest coup: the naming of the CIA’s HQ after the representative of pan-German ‘Black’ counterintelligence. How stupid is that?

We have always been told that, cunning and duplicitous through so many of these people are, they are fundamentally stupid. Their stupidity stems from the fact that they do not appear to understand that all lies have a half-life, like plutonium. The Editor’s 40+ years’ observational experience has led him to the conclusion that the average half-life of a state lie is seven years.

MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, M.S. IS NOT LIKED BECAUSE HE CAN BE TRUSTED, WHICH THEY CAN’T
The REASON the criminalist intelligence cadres don’t like Mr Cottrell is precisely that he, like the Editor knows the Ambassador to be, is trustworthy, a man of principle, a securities technician of the highest calibre, and someone who can often see through deception before the deceiver has even presented it to him. It appears that the Ambassador cannot, at present, see that he is being set up. He may need to put on a new pair of spectacles and see the trees beyond the wood. Acting hastily under duress will have fateful and terminal consequences.

This is not just a matter for the Ambassador: the fate of the whole world is at stake.

The Editor is not expecting Mr Wanta to double-cross him. However in the unlikely event that it turns out that he has done so, the Editor will necessarily make this fact public for all the world to see. It is already a fact that the telephone number, which the Ambassador graciously gave to the Editor in 2005, saying ‘not many people have this number’, is now inoperative.

There may be reasons for this, but it could be interpreted as unfortunate, to say the least.

In summary, all concerned need to ‘sit up and take notice’: you are running grave risks. If these risks were simply to affect a few expendable individuals, that would be ‘one thing’. But since the risks being run will affect the whole world, ALMOST IMMEDIATELY, it is essential that the present foolish, gadarene rush to oblivion be STOPPED NOW.

The United States desperately needs refinancing, after the rapine and pillage perpetrated by the organised criminal cadres that have ransacked the country from their supposedly impregnable positions in high office. The Wanta Plan is the ONLY way forward. The alternative that the corrupt intelligence cadres intend to try to impose will guarantee a US and global economic and financial catastrophe, and will temporarily empower these dark forces, who stand, ‘as we speak’ on the verge of a huge setback. The are not accustomed to setbacks, or to any opposition.

‘Operation Double-Cross’ must NOT be allowed to succeed. You are above this, Mr Wanta. You can count your true friends on less than one hand. Your current advisers are NOT your friends: they intend to scam you, exploit you, compromise you, discard you, and probably to do away with you altogether. The Editor can read their minds. He has been doing this for many years.

The essence of Mr Cottrell’s contribution all along has been his insistence that the funds are held in a corporate securities account, so that they are governed by the securities regime, on which Mr Cottrell is a world-level expert, and not by the porous and wholly unreliable banking environment

Ambassador Wanta’s universally recognised brilliance does not extend to his ability to hold on to funds which have been stolen from him. The criminal intelligence cadres stole his money FROM BANK ACCOUNTS before, and they intend to do so again, because Lee Wanta is reportedly being persuaded by these untrustworthy operatives, under duress, that US banking arrangements are sufficient. They are NOT: not with these sharks around.

WANTA’S FUNDS MUST BE PAID INTO A SECURITIES ACCOUNT
The World Court, the G-9 and the international community generally need to understand, at this extremely late stage, that the only way the funds can be held safely out of the reach of the criminal cadres in the banks and the corrupt and unreformed US intelligence community, is for the funds to be held in a corporate securities account. Given the endemic corruption within the US banking system, the funds could never be safe in any straight US bank account.

The corporate securities account arrangements made for AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., provide the necessary assurance and security. The corporate securities account was made available to the Ambassador by Morgan Stanley because Mr Cottrell is a fully qualified securities professional and expert, and already holds a corporate securities account for his own company. Activation of The Wanta Plan is predicated upon the use of the corporate securities account, without which all the Wanta ‘compromise’ money will be stolen.

WORLD COURT ABOUT TO BE UPSTAGED AGAIN BY THE CROOKS
As will be seen from what follows, the World Court has taken charge of demanding and enforcing the Wanta payment (and parallel Settlements) JUST AS the criminal intelligence cadres may have persuaded Ambassador Wanta, under duress, to dump Mr Cottrell, which will ensure that Mr Wanta will be left in due course with nothing. It may also mean that he will later be ‘disposed of’.

Unfortunately, the Ambassador appears to have fallen for these corrupt blandishments, just at the moment (see below) when decisive action may be taken to enforce the payment.

Looked at the other way round, achievement by the World Court and by the G-9 countries of the Settlements, which has been their focus all along, may in practice remit the funds into the hands of the organised criminal intelligence cadres – thanks to the apparent success of the criminalists with their long-standing offensive to split the Ambassador from Mr Cottrell, whose securities expertise and trustworthiness is the only true protection that the Ambassador has from being left penniless, followed as usual with these evil people, by elimination.

It is also a FACT that these people specialise in creating divisions and tension between partners, in every context. They do this for exclusively malevolent reasons – so that THEY can profit from the consequences.That is what they are seeking to achieve: it has been their intention to split the two, all along. According to reports received, they are on the way to succeeding.

For, unfortunately, the Ambassador has signed certain papers which more or less ensure that this offensive is a fait accompli. He must pull back immediately, or he can expect to suffer the worst possible outcome over time, if past experience is any guide.

No assurances from any of these people can be relied upon. Various CIA operatives known to us by name, including one who provides services to the Ambassador to this very day, have systematically stolen from Ambassador Wanta’s bank accounts in the past. They and their like will do so again.

THE OBJECTIVES OF ‘OPERATION DOUBLE-CROSS’
The overall objectives of what is intended include the abolition of the Wanta Plan, the scrapping of the Basel II banking reforms, the final abrogation of the accord with Ambassador Wanta reached in May 2006 providing for his ‘compromise’ $4.5 trillion payment, separation of the Ambassador from Michael C. Cottrell. M.S., so that the criminalists encounter no further opposition to their schemes to relieve Wanta of all the funds, the stealing of the ‘compromise’ Wanta $4.5 trillion, the hijacking of all the G-8 country and Protocol payments, the stealing of the entire original $27.5 trillion owned by Ambassador Wanta as sole Principal, the stealing of all the fiat off-balance sheet, untaxed funds leveraged from the thievery and exploitation of the Ambassador’s $27.5 trillion, holding onto and stealing the investments of the IMF and Prosperity Programmes and other scam/Ponzi operations mounted by the kleptocracy so that none of the estimated 350,000 payees receive a penny, holding on to those investors’ capital funds, depriving the 160 payee countries of all their agreed-upon Protocol and other payments – and, when everything has been ‘taken care of’, the disposal, on the basis of past practice, of Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta by murder, as they disposed of his Chinese intelligence partner, Howie Kwong Kok. This will be followed, if possible the liquidation of Michael C. Cottrell M.S. and Christopher Story as well. At least, that is what they may have in mind.

If these are NOT the evil intentions underlying this blackmail, its is prudent to assume that they ARE – on the basis of what we know about how these people operate.

For this desperate throw of the dice, the cornered criminalist cadres and financial fraudsters directed by the Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD, Dachau) operative, former President George H. W. Bush Jr., Bush Sr.’s chief handler (Vice President Richard B. Cheney), and their criminalist associates, have persuaded Ambassador Lee Wanta, under duress, to go along blindly with their duplicitous plans – with Wanta perhaps blissfully unaware that he is in the process of being set up as happened before, and will be dumped at the first opportunity, once he has realised that his control over the money is illusory. And that won’t be long after the Settlement (see below).

WANTA LED ASTRAY BY INTEL OFFICIALS WITH DEVIOUS INTENTIONS
Given that the Ambassador has been messed about with now for 15 years, since he was unlawfully taken down in Lausanne on 7th July 1993, his position is pitiable, and provokes great sympathy: but he is being severely misled by untrustworthy US intelligence cadres whose primary objective is to arrange matters so that he is seen to be double-crossing Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. (and, since the Ambassador has benefited from this Editor’s scarce private funds which have not been repaid, Christopher Story), whereupon he will lose control of his funds and will be unceremoniously got rid of, like his former Chinese intelligence colleague.

It is reported to us that a CIA- and Republican Party-linked Attorney may be cooperating in the double-cross operation, even though, when the Editor said last year to the Ambassador ‘I don’t trust him’, Ambassador Wanta replied: ‘You ought to’. Well, the Editor does not, and never did.

He is right and the Ambassador, unfortunately, is wrong.

It is a fact that Ambassador Wanta appears to have had precisely four friends in recent years: Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., who is the only man in the United States who can be trusted with Wanta’s money, the Editor of this service who has so far lost his private funds and has received 12 death threats in the service of the greatest US patriot of our age, one other colleague whose identity is known to this Editor, and HM The Queen. Beyond that small closed circle, all so-called ‘friends’, especially those from the corrupt US intelligence community, are sharks waiting to steal ALL his money and to ensure that he is, ONCE AGAIN, taken out of the picture – this time, for good.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AS BACKGROUND TO THIS BLACKMAIL
Before we elaborate on how the criminal operatives – led by Mossad, DVD (cooperation between these Black intelligence organizations being a VERY long-standing, classic ‘sib’ operation (1)), the criminal cadres inside the CIA and perhaps even traitors within MI6 – intend to pull off this cynical intelligence coup to seize upwards of $400 trillion in the teeth of the determined opposition of the Group of Nine most powerful financial countries, the World Court and even the US Supreme Court, which recently informed the Bush cadres that the Justices did not intend ‘to go down with you’, here is an enumerated summary of certain recent and pertinent developments.

This (numbered, point by point) information is provided as a lead-in to the more precise information (the Main Intelligence Section) that will follow it, and offers background which the more detailed intelligence corroborates.

In other words this enumerated information should be regarded as background which is explained by the specifics that follow the numbered statements herewith:

1. On Wednesday 20th February 2008, David Walker, head of the General Accountability Office (previously the General Accounting Office), a.k.a. the Inspector General, resigned specifically because he was sick and tired of the endless deception, trickery, lies and humbug surrounding the Bush White House’s unlawful financial fraud operations and the hijacking and hold-ups affecting The Wanta Plan Settlement and the other long outstanding payments. He left to work with a new think-tank being established by Pete Peterson, a former US Treasury Secretary, who is reportedly raising $1.0 billion to fund his new operation.

2. On Sunday 24th February, Rupert Murdoch’s Sunday Times, London, whose executives once informed the veteran British journalist Gordon Thomas that they wouldn’t touch Wantagate with a thousand-foot bargepole, came out of their unprofessional shell and published a damning report featuring Frank Johnson, the Mayor of Cleveland, whose Office is suing Citigoup, Goldman Sachs. HSBC and Greenwich Capital (owned by Royal Bank of Scotland), claiming that ‘they acted like organised criminals financing the sale of products that they knew could do nothing but harm’.

• Mr Jackson is the FIRST US public official to call a corrupt spade a garden implement.

In response to this incredible surprise, the Editor emailed him full details of Wantagate and drew his staff’s attention to our report dated 26th December 2007, explaining the financial fraud model underlying the so-called ‘sub-prime’ crisis. It was clear from The Sunday Times’ article that Mr Jackson’s Office had understood the pertinent information contained therein.

3. On Monday 25th February, it was confirmed and verified to the Editor of this service that the International Monetary Fund, recently equipped with a new Managing Director from France, M. Strauss-Kahn, had been placed in overall control of the Wanta and other Settlements, backed by the World Court and two so-called ‘interested’ countries, subsequently identified to us as Russia and Japan. Both these countries’ governments consider that their treatment by the corrupt Bush-Clinton Crime Cartel represents a casus belli, and in several conversations, other parties have mentioned the possibility of a war outcome, without any prompting by the Editor of this service.

4. The IMF were supposed to have taken over the supervisory function with effect from 8.00 am EST on Friday 22nd February. The Fund ran into immediate problems from the US Treasury, which asserted that it needed authority from President Bush Jr., and ventilated other familiar excuses for non-performance – all of which, in the case of the Wanta Settlement, are nonsense because the Treasury’s ‘Treasury Direct’ instructions to Citibank to remit the $4.5 trillion into the corporate securities account with Morgan Stanley, remain unchanged.

5. In response to this typical US Treasury obstruction, the IMF allowed the Treasury an ‘extension’ to 9.00 am EST on Saturday 23rd February 2008 for the Settlement payments. When the US Treasury, as usual, failed to perform, the IMF now informed the relevant parties that it would handle all the practicalities and that the Settlements were now out of the hands of the White House, the Treasury and the Federal Reserve Banks. The Ambassador and Mr Cottrell had been advised all day on 22nd February that payment would be made that day, these undertakings being shown as usual to have been worthless. Likewise certain Trustees about which the Editor has ongoing information had been told to stand by, but to no avail (a repeated scenario given the nefarious dialectical Bush-Greenspan ‘Never-Pay’ or non-performance model described in our reports).

6. At 9.40 pm UK time on Saturday 23rd February, the Editor was informed that release of the ‘macro’ Settlement funds was supposed to have taken place by 9.00 EST. However the IMF discovered that, of the six ‘macro’ banks charged with making the initial payments, only two of them actually held the necessary funds. The other four banks were found not to have been ‘funded’.

It was also stated that the World Court had arranged for significant numbers of international law enforcement and other personnel to travel to the United States to assist in the procurement of the Settlement payments.

7. Item 4 above coincided with reports, received by the Editor at arms’-length at 9.45 pm on 25th February 2008 that $300 trillion had ‘gone missing’.

8. Following the IMF’s failure to procure the Settlement payments, the White House, the Treasury and the Federal Reserve were given until Thursday 28th February by the IMF, representing the international community in general, and the 160 payee countries in particular, to retrieve all the missing funds and to have them placed in the four unfunded banks in order to comply with the requirements of the Group of Nine countries, also representing the international community, This information was likewise provided to us on 25th February 2008 (at about 9.50 pm). The demand was accompanied by indications from diplomatic sources that high-level arrests would otherwise ensue.

9. The Israeli-American Dov Zakheim was now identified as having been ‘used as a funnel for the handling of a lot of money’, with the implication that this had been done unlawfully. Military sources also confirmed separately published assessments that the Central Intelligence Agency has been and remains decisively penetrated by Israeli intelligence, to the continuing detriment of the United States, and that a thorough reassessment of the United States’ close relations with Israel is now essential. The report to this effect was received in London on 25th February at 14:36 pm UK time.

10. After or as the deadline for absolute US compliance with the Settlement(s), set by the Group of Nine for last Thursday, passed with no payments being made, the G-9 met in what was reported to us as ‘continuous session’. At 9.40 pm UK time on 25th February, the Editor had been informed that the White House, the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve had all been given until Thursday 28th February 2008 to have the necessary funds placed in the relevant US bank accounts for onward distribution, after which the G-9 would be reconsidering all their options – having semi-suspended sanctions against the United States with each successful aborted ‘settlement scenario’ modelled upon the standard Bush-Greenspan ‘on again, off-again’ dialectical framework.

11. On 25th February, a US contact with South American connections reported that, out of the blue, a Brazilian party had stated as fact over the landline that (quote) ‘there’s some big scandal going on, that will bring the [US] election forward to May or June’.

12. On 26th February 2008, a fire broke out at the Canary Wharf, London, offices of Crédit Suisse, causing the evacuation of 5,000 employees and the suspension of operations ‘for an hour’. This latest ‘bank fire’ followed the suspension by the same bank of ‘a small number’ of traders a week earlier, who were reportedly suspected of having inflated the value of certain ‘investments’ by an estimated £1.5 billion. The Daily Telegraph [26th February 2008], reporting these developments, perpetrated an interesting ‘Freudian typo’, referring to Crédit Suisse as ‘Credit Squeeze’, and referencing the fact that its staff reporter had received no answer when he had asked whether the ‘small number’ of traders who had been ‘suspended’ could be accounted for on the morning of the fire at the bank’s Canary Wharf premises [see Note: (2) ‘Burning the evidence’]

13. At 1.05pm on Tuesday 26th February, reports were received in our London office to the effect that the Omega Group of recipients had received their ‘packages’ that morning and that Tier Three recipients would be receiving their packages by noon EST on 27th February. The Editor greeted this ‘information’ with extreme scepticism, which proved to be appropriate.

The source did elaborate, however, that it was being asserted behind the scenes (i.e., within the intelligence community) that Ambassador Wanta had been made to sign documentation on pain of forfeiting his payment (see below). Since those proffering such documentation for signature are classic Leninists (that is to say, they have no intention of honouring their side of any such bargain), to have signed any such papers, even under duress, would have been the height of folly on Leo Wanta’s part, as the documentation will have been designed for trickery purposes [see below for why this information was important].

14. Jon Moulton, head of the private equity firm Alchemy Partners (a typically Rosicrucian title) told the SuperReturn 2008 Hedge Fund conference in Munich on 26th February that ‘there will be large private equity failures this year. Absolutely guaranteed. This is a cyclical downturn for the industry. We are going to have very weak returns for a while. Companies will go bust and that is going to be a problem. We have got some savagely leveraged companies out there and, unless something else happens to distract them, the politicians will be back and we can look forward to more regulation and tax damaging this business’.

Interestingly, Mr Moulton blasted his own so-called ‘industry’, although he failed to mention the word ‘criminal’. He added: ‘Buyouts were done on the basis of mythical numbers like pro-forma, adjusted, normalised EBITDA, which almost always turns out to be 20% higher than reality. We were buying false numbers and doing it willingly, but the quality of what we were doing had come down. It’s the same thing that was going on in the US sub-prime market’.

Well, of course that last statement is completely inaccurate, as Mr Moulton must surely be aware: see our report dated 26th December 2007 on the fraudulent finance model underlying the so-called ‘sub-prime’ crisis. On 3rd March 2008, The Daily Telegraph used the phrase ‘fraudulent behaviour by mortgage lenders’ [page B4]. The media is cottoning on, nine months LATE.

15. On 26th February, Dr Joseph Stiglitz, the former Chief Economist at the World Bank, a ‘serious man’ if ever there was one, warned in his newly published book, The Trillion Dollar War, written with Harvard lecturer Linda Bilmes, that the financial and human cost of Bush II’s odious war (the purpose of which was to seize control of the Central Bank of Iraq: see Note (2)) is likely to be not three trillion dollars (that’s the overall cost, all things considered, to the United States), but double that total, given that the cost to the Rest of the World will be about the same. Dr Stiglitz said that the new occupant of the White House will inherit a country that is ‘living on borrowed time and borrowed money’ – yet he FAILED to point out that this could have been avoided if The Wanta Plan had been implemented with the taxed, on-the-books trading programmes starting up in June/July 2006 as should have happened under the Wanta Plan prior to Paulson’s hijacking operation.

• Dr Stiglitz added that there was evidence that the US Government had been trying to cover up the cost of the war: ‘We had to use the Freedom of Information Act to uncover things that we never would have known’. Pointing to the high numbers of injured servicemen, he noted that ‘the official website figure was less than half the total’. In 16 years’ time, the United States would be facing a $4.0 billion annual bill for injured servicemen. He estimated that 40% of the US military currently fighting in Iraq will return home severely disabled.

• It is therefore no surprise that President George W. Bush’s eyes have turned jet black. He has not only murdered an estimated 1.5 million people in Iraq, but has wrecked the lives of a huge number of US servicemen. Please see the Editor’s comments about demonic possession in the report dated 25th February 2008.

16. At 3.42pm on 26th February, the Editor received a phone call from a contact in which it was stated that the necessary impetus had been placed once again behind the Settlements, and that key Trustees had yet again been placed on standby to go into the relevant banks to take care of their ‘macro’ payments. This unverified information, of course, presupposed that the $300 trillion will have been retrieved in the interim.

17. At 3.55 pm on 26th February, the Editor was informed that (a) certain people were very pleased with the Editor’s posting dated 25th February, and (b) that it had made a number of parties finally aware that the United States is run by a psychopath. (Note: This assessment was conveyed to us for several days thereafter).

• At the same time, extreme annoyance at the articles within the criminalised echelons of US intelligence triggered yet another cyber-attack on the communications of Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. and Ambassador Leo Wanta. (The ‘Bush on the Couch’ report was first published in International Currency Review, known as ‘the green book’, in January 2005, so it was already three years old).

• As an interesting sideline, the first component of the 26th February report, dealing with the Ronald Reagan Library Wanta papers, contained our information about the CIA front organization which called itself Multi-Sector Crisis Management, run by a Mr and Mrs Neil Thompson. We have learned that exposure of this operation by this service resulted in its abrupt closure.

Notwithstanding that the operatives in that nest tried to scam the Ambassador and Mr Cottrell (see the preceding report), Mr Neil Thompson had the extreme audacity and shamelessness to get in touch with Ambassador Wanta recently, in search of future opportunities.

Another response to our posting that segment of the report (despite the fact that we had published the text as an occasional paper, distributed with International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 and 2 on 14th September 2007) was: ‘Oh, we’d forgotten about that’.

According to sources, the operatives running that now defunct US intelligence front had allegedly tried to gain access to $3 billion owned by Mr Cottrell and held for his account abroad but which he has been unable to access.

18. Repeated inaccurate, but ruthlessly disseminated, reports were noted during this period, and earlier in February, that Ambassador Wanta had taken economic receipt of his ‘compromise’ $4.5 trillion, thereby releasing his claim, as sole Principal, of the $27.5 trillion base funds that he owns and which were stolen from him (as he has proved to be unable, given his banking orientation, to prevent his criminalist colleagues from stealing his funds).

• These inaccurate reports were fed into the ‘system’ by CIA disinformation hacks, followed the standard ‘ying-yang’, ‘backy-forthy’, ‘Urim-Thummim’ (Yes and No) dialectical methodology which is the essence of the Bush-Greenspan ‘Never-Pay’ ‘perpetual deception’ model. It was also thought that these ruthless deception specialists could be engaged in a ‘sib’ operation to maximise their potential for ensuring the permanent capture and retention of all the stolen funds.

19. On Wednesday 27th February 2008, at 10.40pm, the Editor was informed by telephone at 10:40 am that the Group of Nine powerful financial countries had been meeting for the past two days.

• Condoleeza Rice, the US Secretary of State, had demanded to participate in the meeting, but was informed that her demands and her words could not be trusted and had no meaning, and that her presence was neither required and nor would it be appreciated. Ms Rice is a candidate for arrest, along with all members of the Bush II Cabinet. The Group of Nine, along with the Rest of the World (the 160 payee countries), now regard the United States as a pariah state.

• It was separately reported to us by several sources that certain wire transfers had been delayed or held up from Wednesday 27th February onwards.

20. It was also simultaneously reported to the Editor of this service on 27th February that President George Bush had delivered a cynical little speech to ‘his friends’, in which he had bragged that he hoped ‘everyone was now enjoying spending their money’. This information could only have been leaked, since the Editor unfortunately lacks a fly on the Oval Office wall.

21. On both Wednesday and Thursday 27th-28th February, Dr Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, testified before Congress. In response to a question about the Basel II reformed banking system, Bernanke answered the question correctly, describing what it would procure. However, significantly, he was NOT asked the pertinent questions about Basel II, which are these: Has the Basel II banking system, which has been in force in Germany since 1st January 2007, been introduced in the United States yet? If not, when will it be introduced? Why was it not introduced as scheduled, with effect from the turn of this year? Why has the Wanta settlement been repeatedly hijacked? Is it the intention to make the Wanta payment? Is it the intention to make the other Settlement payments? Is it the intention to steal all the funds (see below)? One might add, given the notorious corruption in the US Congress, that this further question might have been asked (in the closed session; see immediately below): How much will you pay each of us not to reveal that you are continuing to steal and misappropriate the Wanta and other Settlement funds?

• For those who are unaware of this, open US Congressional testimony sessions on sensitive subjects are preceded by secret classified meetings, at which it is decided, in advance, which questions the witnesses will be asked. These meetings take place in the Capitol itself, and are highly secret, access being code clearance only. All documents taken into the sessions must be left there and may not be removed when it ends. The Editor testified twice before Congressional Committees in the 1980s, and of course, since he did not hold a sensitive post, this did not occur on those occasions: but when someone like the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board is the witness, this is the procedure. Therefore, what emerges from the open testimony question and answer sessions, is rigged, and doctored for public consumption. That explains why Dr Bernanke was not asked the appropriate questions on this occasion.

• The 408-page Federal Reserve Board document entitled ‘Basel II Final Rules: Federal Reserve Board Open Board meeting: November 2, 2007: 10.00 a.m. EDT’ sent to the Editor of International Currency Review by the Federal Reserve Board, compiled by and on behalf of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the US Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Treasury’s Office of Thrift Supervision, contains the following rubric:
Dates: This final rule is effective [INSERT DATE].

22. In the course of Wednesday 27th February, it became clear that the recalcitrant US criminalist forces had no intention of meeting the Fund’s deadline of Thursday 28th February 2008 for the Settlements. It was also reported that a very large real estate developer in Nevada, involved in major development projects, had defaulted on a $500 million interest payment. Anecdotal reports were being received of Americans handing in the keys of their properties to banks, the keys of their cars to dealerships and returning defaulted credit cards to the providers.

• Background reports of the Group of Nine debating the necessity of finally giving the go-ahead for the on-again, off-again sanctions against the United States, were received all day.

23. On Thursday 28th February (an ‘up’ day according to the ying-yang dialectical disinformation model), the Editor received a phone call from a source at 1.20pm to the effect that ‘Leo Wanta had been placed on notice last night that he was to be paid’.

This ‘report’ was accompanied by statements to the effect that US Treasury officials ‘went to the (relevant) bank early this morning’, a certain trustee had to go to his bank in Connecticut at 2.00 am, another Trustee who banks offshore was called to his bank, while a key lawyer in France who had left Paris for his countryside residence for the evening, had suddenly been recalled from his home and brought back to Paris by his chauffeur. These reports, at least so far as Ambassador Lee Wanta was concerned, proved to represent disinformation. Today was an ‘up’ day. Wednesday had been a ‘down’ day’. Tuesday had been an ‘up’ day’. Money had been a ‘down’ day.

24. It was reported, and later confirmed, on 28th February, that President Bush had informed the relevant banks that they need not comply with the demands of the International Monetary Fund.

• So they didn’t.

• STOP: This reflects the reality that the criminal US Presidency and the criminal enterprise banks are defying, now, THE ENTIRE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY, as represented by the Fund.

25. At 13:54 pm UK time on 28th February, a contact with the US military reported to us that ‘no payment will be made today’. (This assertion was emphatically repeated on the following day).

26. It is confirmed (from sources separate to the single published source) that Bush Sr. (41) sent a legal team to the World Court on Wednesday 28th February to demand immunity for his and for his associates’ endless crimes, and that, simultaneously, President George W. Bush Jr. sent his own legal team to the Supreme Court to beg likewise for immunity, on his behalf and on behalf of his entire Cabinet – and that in both instances, immunity was refused. The precise circumstances of this development are recounted in the Main Intelligence Section below.

• It is also true that the entire Bush II Cabinet has been informed, through legal channels, that immunity from the consequences of their financial and related crimes, their co-conspiracy, and the fact that they are individually and collectively accessories to the fact of endless crimes (notably the financial crimes delineated in earlier Wantagate reports) has been flatly refused.

• It is understood that the World Court and the Supreme Court listened patiently to the respective Presidents’ pleadings, and were not impressed. The real background to these Bush applications for immunity is given in the Main Intelligence, reported below.

27. At 19:41 UK time on Friday 28th the Editor sent the following email to Ambassador Lee Wanta, Michael C. Cottrell , M.S. and Thomas Henry, Wanta’s lawyer. It is addressed to Mr Henry:

Thomas E Henry
1125 South 79th Street
Omaha
Nebraska 58124 USA

28th February 2008

Wisconsin Case # 92CF683

Could you let me know, as soon as possible, please, what steps, if any, have been taken since July 2005 to procure the necessary justice and substantial financial compensation that is clearly due to the Ambassador in respect of the illegal incarceration, probation and taxation of Ambassador Wanta predicated upon the basis of the fabricated and duplicated Delinquent Tax Warrant #44-00162088 which was the subject of a notarised Outagamie Court ‘Satisfaction of Delinquent Tax Warrant’ dated 1st June 1993, and notwithstanding that the relevant illegally charged amount of $14,129 had been paid by the Ambassador twice in 1992? As you know I am an interested party in this matter, since my loan of $35,000 which paid the same amount for the third time, fell due for repayment on 10th June 2007 but was not repaid as it should have been, and my private funds were disbursed as follows: $24,900.91 was credited by the Wisconsin Department of Revenue to account 5QJLF7V5 which is nothing to do with the Ambassador, while $4,167.64 of my private funds were paid by the State Department of Corrections to the Wisconsin Defender’s Office contrary to Federal Law as the Ambassador asked for his own Defender and was refused.

If nothing has been done, could please respond accordingly, so that I can incorporate this fact into my next report. I also need this information for a possible application to the US Supreme Court so that I can recover my funds, which appear to have been misallocated/stolen by the Wisconsin Department of Revenue.

I would be most grafeful for your prompt response to this enquiry within seven days, so that I can have the necessary information to hand pending my forthcoming visit to New York.

For your information, I wrote last October under the Misprision of Felony Statute to Judge Martin in Wisconsin, who had written to me last July explaining why he would be doing nothing to rectify matters. Christopher Story FRSA. cstory@worldreports.org.

28. Open media reports confirmed that massive margin calls had occurred on Friday 29th February [see Main Intelligence Section, for explanation below]. An FDIC official was reported to have made negative public comments about 76 US banks [see above].

29. Over the weekend of 1st-2nd March, it became clear, from numerous pointers, that the criminal US intelligence establishment have decided that Barack Obama is to be the next President of the United States. He will be clueless, permissive and extremely weak. His campaign is reported to have hired 12,000 square feet in downtown Chicago, through a mob-related entity, Rezco, at the knockdown price of $12.0 per square foot. The mob connection again, of course.

• The ‘switch’ to Obama has coincided with an outbreak of overtly anti-Jewish reports all over the place, implying that an ‘Operation Revenge’ (which the Editor knows exists) against the excessive power of the Jews in the United States is about to be unleashed. If this assessment is accurate, it would reflect the extremes to which prominent Jews have gone as Wantagate has developed, to steal as much money for themselves as possible – starting with Mr Paulson’s illegal retention of control over the $4.5 trillion Settlement funds agreed with Ambassador Wanta, at Goldman Sachs.

• The ‘third catastrophe’ written into the blueprint for global chaos and control by the demonically possessed 19th century sorcerer and necromancer, Albert Pike, calls for the Illuminati to foment lethal enmity between the Jews and Islam which will escalate to engulf the whole world, leaving the manipulators – who presume that they are authorised to direct mankind’s total affairs in what they regard as a purely mechanistic world, supposedly in charge, and then able to create ‘order out of chaos’. However all they can achieve is chaos out of order, as Lucifer, their god – the god of lies and confusion, and the Prince of this World – turns everything upside down and back to front.

• By extension, the ‘neat arrangements’ that Ambassador Wanta is being blackmailed and coerced into accepting, will NOT deliver the outcomes that he expects. It will turn his world upside down again and leave him stranded, all his money stolen, and in a worse condition than ever before, because once they have stolen his funds for good, they will do a ‘Foster’ or a ‘Howie Kwong Kok’ on him. That is what they always do, and if he thinks otherwise, he will once again become a tragic victim of his own kind nature. That is the Editor’s carefully considered assessment.

• The criminal intelligence nexus that is strangling the United States has its base in Chicago, the HQ of the mob. The other key centers of this open-ended criminality are Fort Meade, the controlled political structures in Washington, and elements of the US intelligence community.

• The contaminated power model operates as follows. The Intelligence Power, with its capacity for penetration, interpenetrates the Chicago-headquartered organised criminal community, and vice versa. This means that, as repeatedly stressed in these reports, the US intelligence community, like its Soviet counterpart, is a criminal enterprise. (There is really no such thing as a ‘White hat’. There are ‘Black hats’ and ‘Grey Hats’).

• The Intelligence Power penetrates the two other sides of the power triangle, namely the Military Power and ‘the Party’ (with its two falsely competing, controlled dialectical opposites. To make controlled democracy appear to ‘work’, these fake dialectical opposites do adhere to different philosophies, concocted in such a way as to bamboozle the hoi polloi, the Goyim, the ‘masses’, and/or the ‘sheeple’). It is its ‘power to penetrate’ that keeps the Intelligence Power on top.

Because the Intelligence Power penetrates ‘the Party’, it gets to select the holders of the highest offices. Its partial (but incomplete) penetration of the Military Power has assured – UNTIL NOW – that it retains control – which is why the CIA criminal enterprises have succeeded in amassing colossal fortunes off-balance sheet, offshore, and without a penny having been paid in tax.

And the corrupt Treasury, with its corrupt Internal Revenue Service, has allowed all this to occur, thereby operating in absolute dereliction of its duty to manage the United States’ finances at the optimum level of rectitude. Senior officials at that Department have behaved disgracefully.

We have long since pointed out, for instance, that if the Wanta Settlement had not been hijacked by ‘the late’ Henry M. Paulson (see below), the Treasury would have received its windfall $1.575 trillion in June/July 2006, followed by no less than $200 billion (estimated) accruals per banking day from the Wanta Plan’s projected on-balance sheet investment operations involving AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., Mr Cottrell’s Pennsylvania Investments, Inc, and six or eight banks operating properly on-balance sheet, with all accruals taxed.

Paulson, Cheney and the Bush and Clinton Crime Families thwarted this agreed-upon Wanta Plan, and for this reason are jointly and severally chargeable with treason – as indeed is EVERYONE WHO IS NOW STANDING IN THE WAY OF THE SETTLEMENTS AS ORIGINALLY PLANNED, including close advisers to Ambassador Wanta.

This, therefore, is the point at which we think it is appropriate to read EVERYONE CONCERNED, yet again, the RIOT ACT. You know about this criminality? It’s your legal duty to report it:

U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: MISPRISION OF FELONY:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

30. At 3:16 a.m. on Saturday 1st March, the Editor of this service sent the following email to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. This email induced a flurry of activity at the weekend, given that it exposed that the criminal cadres have indeed set up a new conduit for the specific intent of stealing and exploiting ALL THE MONEY, INCLUDING THAT PAYABLE TO THE IMF/PROSPERITY PROGRAMME PAYEES AND ALL THE OTHER TIERS INVOLVED (see the Main Intelligence Section below):

Please provide me with a written confirmation or denial of the following statement which has been made to us by a financial market source:

‘The Federal Reserve set up a dummy corporation to steal the IMF/Prosperity programme money a week ago during a fund movement’.

This allegation was received in the early morning UK time 1st March 2008.

As you may appreciate, should we receive no response from you, that may be taken as an indication that the allegation may be accurate, and may be published on our website accordingly, in this context. We will publish your reply.

Your urgent attention is appreciated. For the sake of good order, please be advised that the next ‘Wantagate’ report is in preparation and must include a reference to this matter.

Christopher Story FRSA
Editor and Publisher
International Currency Review
108 Horseferry Road
Westminster
London SW1P 2EF
United Kingdom
Email: cstory@worldreports.org
Website: www.worldreports.org

• Note: At the time of this posting, NO REPLY HAD BEEN RECEIVED.

31. At 2.30 pm UK time on Sunday 2nd March, the Editor learned that 12 officials and bankers had been arrested in France on Saturday 1st March. Those concerned were reported to have been standing in the way of the Settlements. Sources then reiterated to the Editor that the attempts in the preceding week by Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. to obtain immunity [see Main Intelligence Section, below] had indeed failed: and the specific reason for this was that Bush Jr. had been caught in flagrante accepting a PERSONAL PAYMENT while visiting Africa (as explained below).

•The point here is that President Bush was actually caught taking a personal bribe of substantial proportions, and his father was involved as well: this left the authorities with NO OPTION but to proceed to have these crooks arrested. However the arrests were averted (temporarily) when the illegal personal payment was reversed (causing the stock market sell-off and margin calls that occurred on 29th February: again, see below). That the arrests did not proceed is ludicrous: if I steal from you, you find out and I restore what I have stolen, I am still guilty of the original theft.

32. The Editor was informed on Sunday 2nd March at 2.40pm UK time that the World Court, having well understood that the problems are caused by a small clique of ‘world class criminals’ holding current and former high office, has agreed with the Group of Nine countries that these powers are not going to allow a World War, which is being contemplated, to break out (as has been discussed intensively in some capitals) because of the criminal operations of the Bush-Clinton Crime Wave.

33. It was further revealed to us on Sunday that the World Court had informed the International Monetary Fund and the US military that they have until Monday (unclear whether this INCLUDED the whole of Monday 3rd March) to implement the Wanta and the other Settlements.

• Failing that, the World Court will take direct responsibility for procuring the Settlements, and all who are standing in the way, including those at the highest levels in the United States, the entire US Cabinet and George Bush Sr., will be arrested. Our source could not elaborate as to how this outcome would be achieved, but the message for the time being is that the powers to settle will be taken out of the hands of the IMF and the US military, and assumed by the World Court, on behalf of the Group of Nine financial powers.

• The US response appears to have been to escalate tensions in the Middle East, which we always suspected they would do as soon as their position had reached this stage of exposure.

34. As a corollary to all this, we were told that the G-9 sanctions, which had been semi-suspended (although certain incidents involving sanctions have been recorded) would be reimposed in force, with no further prevarication. Since the G-9 have backed off from implementing the full sanctions against the United States each time that the ‘ying-yang’ dialectical on-again, off-again ‘Never Pay’ charade has been perpetrated, one cannot be sure at this juncture that the G-9 will proceed. But it does appear, especially in the light of the near arrest on personal corruption charges of Bush Jr. and his evil father, that there will indeed be no turning back. Except that they may again back off because of the deliberately contrived escalation of tension in the Middle East ( = OBFUSCATION).

• It is this ‘evolution of events’ that makes Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta’s reported vacillation and vulnerability to the blackmail blandishments of his untrustworthy intel colleagues, of such world-shattering importance; and that makes what he decides to do now – whether to dump Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. as his corporate Treasurer and double-cross Christopher Story – so unprecedentedly critical both for him and for the future of mankind.

35. At 5.20 pm on Sunday 2nd March 2008, the Editor was informed as follows concerning Paulson:

• It is KNOWN in the relevant circles in Germany and France that the ‘Paulson’ purporting to represent himself as Paulson is NOT Henry M. Paulson, who they know was shot on 28th/29th December 2007 as we reported. Images of ‘Paulson’ standing at a podium with his hands open, as usual, showing the crooked little finger on the left hand, are library photos, and are attributed to Associated Press, an Agency-controlled mouthpiece.

• Knowledge of this reality is held inside European government structures and by individuals ‘in positions to know’, according to our sources.

• It is assumed by these sources that the countries and individuals have evidence as to who ordered Paulson’s assassination, since we know that efforts are being made to have that official indicted for murder. This is, as they say, a ‘breaking story’.

With respect to a few people who have written angrily and thoughtlessly to the Editor of this service in this subject, we have two things to say. First, our report dated 9th January summarises all that we have been in any position to assert, until now. Secondly, the key source of any apparent disinformation which may or may not feature in this matter, is of course the filthy, corrosive, Agency-controlled network of paid liars and dialectical diversion specialists whose job it is to OBFUSCATE and to maximise the potential for confusion, as cover for the endless criminal acts that are being perpetrated 24/7 behind the scenes by the criminal cadres in charge. Their job is not to tell the truth, but rather to promulgate and sustain confusion AS A DELIBERATE ACT OF STATE POLICY.

This means, inevitably, that extracting the truth from this endless barrage of lies is an arduous task, which is why this service maintains its own network of sources that are unconnected with the US disinformation apparat. One cannot always be sure that one has not been deceived: we believe that we have sifted most of the lies out, but we may have erred occasionally: what can one expect when, as in Nazi Germany, the ENTIRE U.S. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT IS NOW BASED UPON THE ARBITRARY MIXING OF FACT AND DIVERSIONARY FICTION, a.k.a. deception?

• However, we rely as previously upon our report dated 9th January, plus the additional ‘Paulson’ information added here. There is a separate library of forensic evidence in support of the fact that Paulson was shot (which we know to be true, given that it was reported by official sources, to the Principals, as we stated at the time), while the death was corroborated by the State Department, a veteran Federal Reserve Governor and an Ambassador, whose identities we were requested to conceal but which are known to the Editor of this service.

• We expect ‘further shoes to drop’ on this subject, but would caution that it is pointless to argue about this matter until they do. Please bear ALL the above in mind.

MAIN INTELLIGENCE SECTION

Following the Editor’s email to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve in the early morning of the 1st March 2008, referenced above, the significance of our pointed mention of the US Federal Reserve’s ‘dummy corporation’ set up to steal ALL THE FUNDS, suddenly unravelled – as did the significance of President George W. Bush’s peculiar visit to Africa (which HM The Queen had at the forefront of her mind when she asked the Group of Eight financial powers last June to procure The Wanta Plan settlement ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’). Specifically:

BUSH JR. CAUGHT TAKING A PERSONAL BRIBE IN AFRICA
It was reported to us by the most reliable sources that President George W. Bush took a $1.0 billion-plus PERSONAL payment while visiting Africa, as part of a scheme to establish an ‘African Central Bank’. The new, corrupt ‘African Central Bank’ is to act as the counterparty for the unlawful trading of all the funds belonging to payees which the criminal cadres are intent upon stealing even as the IMF, the US military, the Group of Nine and the World Bank actually procure the Settlements.

As you know the holder of office under the United States is precluded from accepting personal bribes and under-the-table payments, and enriching himself by virtue of the office that he holds. The payment was, known, traced, and demonstrated to be blatantly illegal; and when confronted by the relevant authorities, both former President H. W. Bush and President G W. Bush panicked and rushed their legal teams to the World Court and the US Supreme Court, respectively – specifically in order to secure immunity from the consequences of the illegal activities related to that personal payment, known to have been at least $1.0 billion, but believed to have been higher – although sources elaborate that both Bushes, cornered by Wantagate, took the opportunity to seek immunity from arrest and indictment for all their other financial fraud operations and other crimes, too.

Neither Court granted them immunity, as correctly reported by another source.

It is certainly curious that their joint come-uppance was related to such a ‘small’ illegal personal payment – given the magnitude of the other financial crimes, in which, as we have reported, they have been involved: but you will recall that it is very often the case that criminals are ‘taken down’ on ‘lesser’ offences which are watertight in court, whereas much larger crimes may be harder to prove. (Notorious mobsters, for example, have historically been jailed for tax offences, despite the fact that their involvement in massive scams, murders etc is known).

BUSH’S BRIBE REVEALS THE SECRET ACCOUNT SET UP TO STEAL THE FUNDS
Bush’s illegal personal payment was structured via a bank account established for a new shell corporation established by US in telligence cadres within the World Bank and funnelled through the Federal Reserve Inter Bank Settlement Fund to the newly qualified ‘African Central Bank’.

Hence President Bush Jr.s visit to Africa, his cockiness throughout, and his curious recent press conference at which he blathered about AIDS and other projects for Africa – which, in reality, are the ‘public face’ of the intended corrupt financing conduit that intelligence cadres and the corrupt World Bank (yes, it’s still as corrupt as ever, under Zoellick) have established, probably to replace the similar ‘mortgage crisis’ off-off-balance sheet financing ‘Black Hole’ projects in Washington, DC that the ‘late’ Mr Paulson tried to establish for ongoing illegal, off-balance sheet, untaxed trading purposes before the unfortunate events at the end of last year.

The new ‘African Central Bank’ counterparty arrangements were no doubt not unconnected with the fact that the key ‘Black Hole’ properties of the Central Bank of Iraq had been exposed by this service. As a direct consequence of that exposure, in late January 2008, four (perhaps, depending on the source used, six) floors of the Central Bank of Iraq on Al-Rasheed Street, Central Baghdad, were burned out as the corruption crisis caught fire at the ‘Black Hole’ so carefully annexed by the Bush Crime Family and their corrupt associates. The Central Bank of Iraq, which has appeared to be ‘independent’, was in fact controlled, of course, directly by the White House – for unlawful, off-balance sheet, untaxed high-yield programme trading purposes.

The whole point of the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 was precisely to seize the Central Bank of Iraq, to steal its currency and gold, to remove the Saddam Hussein-era General Management and replace them with compliant operatives, to issue instructions from the Central Bank to Saddam Hussein’s ‘private’ bank, Rafidain Bank, reputed to have accumulated some $100 trillion of fiat assets at its London Branch, and then to exploit the Central Bank of Iraq, controlled directly from the White House, as the counterparty for ongoing illegal, off-balance sheet, untaxed financial fraud operations, i.e. corrupt ‘business as usual’.

• It is possible that the stealing of HM The Queen’s gold, exclusively reported by this service last year, was related to the refusal of the British authorities to allow the avaricious Americans to seize control of the $100+ trillion of ‘assets’ at the London branch of Rafidain Bank.

However it must be emphasised that this suggestion currently represents merely an ‘inspired assessment’ on the part of this Editor.

Anyway, when the backwash from Wantagate caught up with the perpetrators, and after we had exposed the White House’s control of the Central Bank of Iraq and its purpose, it was time to burn the evidence. Reports of the fire at the Central Bank coincided with separate reports that some $800 billion had ‘gone missing’ from the Central Bank of Iraq. We are advised that these ‘assets’ may have been shifted temporarily to Switzerland, and that it was necessary to cover the tracks in Baghdad: hence the fire which consumed at least four floors of the building.

The new shell account within the World Bank funnelled through the closed Federal Reserve Inter Bank Settlement Fund appears to be the dummy corporation set up by the Federal Reserve to steal the IMF/Prosperity Programme money’ referenced in the Editor’s email to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System sent at 3: 16 a.m. on 1st March, referenced above.

THE REVERSAL OF THE BUSH PERSONAL BRIBE
CAUSED LAST FRIDAY’S MARKET SELL-OFF AND MARGIN CALLS
When the personal corrupt payment was exposed as illegal and was on the verge of being used as the pretext for the immediate arrest of George Bush Senior and his schizophrenic psychopath of a son, the payment had to be reversed.

Since this was a cash-cash situation – and there is hardly ANY CASH liquidity at all in the system – Municipal Bond Portfolios were sold off at discounted prices to create and generate the necessary funds – since other collateral is treated these days as having no real value.

• THAT IS HOW SERIOUS THE SITUATION HAS BECOME DUE TO THIS CRIMINALITY PERPETRATED AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, WHICH HAS BEEN EXPOSED EXCLUSIVELY AS AN ONGOING CONSEQUENCE OF THESE WANTAGATE REPORTS.

PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE AGAINST AMBASSADOR WANTA
Against this background, the relevant cadres of the US intelligence community have, as indicated, stepped up their psychological pressure on Ambassador Wanta to ‘dump’ Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., who provides Wanta’s ONLY lifeline, as the Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. – given the highly principled stance that Mr Cottrell has taken against all forms of financial criminality, and in the light of the pressure that Mr Cottrell has been able to exert, combined with the huge global impact of these Wantagate reports prepared by this Editor.

• The skewed ‘thinking’ behind this nonsense is that the exposure of the illegal activities of the Bushes, Cheney, the Clintons, the ‘late’ Mr Paulson, and others, is getting in the way of other ongoing and intended corrupt operations. To which the obvious answer is: you should have thought of that BEFORE you stole the Ambassador’s $4.5 trillion, not 22 months afterwards.

LOW CALIBRE OF U.S. INTELLIGENCE CADRES
It is indicative of the extremely low calibre of US intelligence that the huge benefits that would have accrued to the United States if The Wanta Plan had been implemented in June/July 2006, rather than being hijacked by them (for this Paulson, of course, was an operative), have been squandered by these criminals; and that the intention, following this DISASTER, is to perpetuate this illegality by inveigling the Ambassador into a slot where he can be scammed, hung, drawn and quartered, and certainly polished off finally, after all his money has been stolen.

• THE FACT that the relevant US intelligence cadres have resisted The Wanta Plan and Basel II throughout, confirms that the CIA and its appendages are indeed a huge CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE.

• Put another way, the people involved with all this devious scheming around Ambassador Wanta, having made a revolting dogs’ dinner of the situation and brought the whole world to the brink of catastrophe due to their ingrained criminality, prefer to continue this aberrant behaviour and to drag the whole world into an economic morass with no historical precedent, as we first predicted our report dated 2nd September 2006. That is because they thrive in an environment of open-ended criminal chaos – which is to say, that they prefer the Law of the Jungle to the Rule of Law.

THE U.S. COULD LONG SINCE HAVE BEEN REFINANCED
They could have refinanced the United States and the whole world by now, heaving restored America to her rightful place as leader of the nations: instead of which they have done the only things that they know how to do: ‘bait and switch’, off-balance sheet self-enrichment operations, scamming, stealing and endless lying, deception and murder.

Of course these madmen are all destined ultimately to be cast into outer darkness. Because they know this, these people want to drag the rest of us there too – so that they won’t be lonely.

The Editor understood long ago why certain of his US contacts kept invoking ‘national security’, when what they were actually covering up was their own involvement in criminal operations, or those of family members. All concerned, including the Ambassador, should be reminded yet again of the Misprision of Felony Statute, which the Ambassador has in the past been very keen that the Editor rams down the throats of every American who reads these reports.

In fact, if the Ambassador is about to collaborate with these criminals, he will himself be in breach of the Misprision of Felony Statute which he has been so keen that the Editor should promulgate. No-one is above the law, not even the greatest US patriot of our age. Sorry: that’s the truth.

BLACKMAILED, DIRECTED, COERCED – SO THAT HE CAN BE SCAMMED AND DUMPED.
To cut a long story slightly shorter, Ambassador Wanta was directed or coerced – at the specific insistence of one more more special advisers to President George W. Bush, that the Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. Morgan Stanley International Securities Account, operative under the Private Joint Venture Agreement between Mr Cottrell’s Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. and AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. dated 30th December 2005 – should not take early receipt of an agreed-upon $500 billion of funds that are necessary to undertake an International Financial Instrument Contract – until ‘official’ approval has been obtained. The reason given for this was that Mr Cottrell may now be considered to be ‘too powerful’ and ‘the Ambassador’s role was not observed to be equal’.

This perverse perception reflects the facts that Michael Cottrell is a known and globally respected securities industry expert of the highest intellectual calibre, that operating in the securities sector is essential to ensure the long-term protection of the funds (since the safeguards in the securities sector are much tighter than in the decadent US banking sector).

The idea that this state of affairs places Mr Wanta at a disadvantage vis-à-vis Mr Cottrell (i.e., that Mr Cottrell is about to ransack his funds) is childish poppycock: at no time could Mr Cottrell be deemed as likely to take financial measures contrary to Ambassador Wanta’s wishes. However the Ambassador has to come to terns with the fact that Mr Cottrell knows what he is talking about, that the securities sector is the only environment within which these operations can function without running the risk of the usual suspects stealing the funds, and that there is no safe alternative to the existing arrangements.

• Here, the Editor wishes to point out that these reflections are entirely his own arms’-length conclusions. Far from Mr Cottrell being likely to steal the Ambassador’s funds, the reality is that any US operatives now “parachuted in’ to replace Michael Cottrell will have been imposed PRECISELY IN ORDER TO RIFLE THE FUNDS AND TO LEAVE AMBASSADOR WANTA DESTITUTE AGAIN.

• The sole trustworthy Treasurer in town is Michael C. Cottrell, M.S.

It is true that Mr Cottrell speaks his mind when he has a point to make, and that sometimes the Editor of this service has himself been wounded by what he has had to say. But the fact has been that if Mr Cottrell had lied to the Editor, he would have found this out several years ago; and that everything that this top expert has had to say concerning matters of mutual concern has been succinct, accurate, to the point, and of the highest intellectual and ethical standards.

The Ambassador’s skills are known and admired worldwide – from HM The Queen to Peking – but they just do not happen to include expertise in the complex US securities environment. That is where Mr Cottrell excels: and as the Ambassador told the Editor when he introduced Mr Cottrell to him several years ago, ‘you can trust him’.

AMBASSADOR: THESE PEOPLE CANNOT BE TRUSTED
What has changed, then? Only one thing. The siren and unreliable blackmail blandishments of intelligence community colleagues who have brought the whole world to the brink of disaster thanks to their serial criminality, their myopia, their self-interest, and their culpable support for open-ended criminality – not least given that THEY, TOO are subject to the Misprision of Felony Statute. This is a point that these cadres conveniently overlook.

As for any ‘promises’ or undertakings that these people may have proffered to the Ambassador, they are sure to be worthless – like all the promises that he fell for in the past. The only people he can rely on are those he chose several years ago. He should continue with them and signify to these people that he is not changing his settled arrangements.

Otherwise there will indeed be a disaster – for him, for the United States, and for the whole world.

He should recognise, and concede, that he needs Mr Cottrell’s special expertise, and that trustworthy Treasurers in the United States hardly exist at all.

• Why throw away the ONLY trustworthy expert, and a world-class one at that, just because these ‘snake-oil salesmen’ operatives have ‘got to him’ and he wants to get back ‘into the game’?

It is a disaster, and terminal madness.

WANTA IS BEING GIVEN ORDERS BY THE INTEL BLACKMAILERS
On 1st March, it became clear to us that the Ambassador was now required to ‘place his own people’ into the operation, and to appoint a new overall Treasurer for AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., since Mr Cottrell will be ‘too busy’ doing those functions mandated by the relevant authorities, and would not be able to do “day-to-day” operations.

• It was further pointed out, in so many words, to the Ambassador that since Mr Cottrell is not an intelligence officer, he is not ‘qualified’ to be the Treasurer of such funds.

This stance clearly contradicts the Private Joint Venture Agreement signed between Lee Emil Wanta (AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.) and Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. (Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.), as provided for in an AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. corporate resolution dated 16th December 2005, under the terms of which Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. was unanimously elected to serve as Executive Vice-President and Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., with Lee E. Wanta elected as President/Chief Executive Officer, and various joint ventures were authorised between Wanta’s corporation and Pennsylvania Investments, Inc [see above].

Furthermore, Leo E. Wanta (Lee E. Wanta) signed and dated, on 26th February 2006, a letter TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, identifying Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., the President of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., and giving him authorisation to ‘conclude the details and disposition of said settlement funds for deposit via Pennsylvania Investments In, Inc. Account(s) on behalf of Leo E. Wanta/Lee E. Wanta with the Social Security Number [redacted by the Editor for security reasons]’.

In summary, the US intelligence community have tried to manoeuvre into a position where they are engaged in blackmailing Ambassador Wanta into sacking Michael C. Cottrell. M.S., as the Executive Vice President and Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. – as a rather sordid quid pro quo (which of course cannot be relied upon) for the Settlement payment to Wanta.

• And all this is happening behind the backs of the International Monetary Fund, the US military, the World Court and the Group of Nine who are on the verge of subjecting the United States to an unprecedented sanctions offensive in order to procure the Settlement payments.

EXTREME RISKS THAT LEO WANTA IS RUNNING
We need hardly elaborate that this state of affairs presents Ambassador Wanta with many grievous problems – the nature of which he may not have fully grasped.

To begin with, the time lapse between the murder in 1992 of Lee Wanta’s Chinese partner, Howie Kwong Kok, from ingesting rat poison, shortly after the visit to Singapore of George Bush Sr., and the unlawful arrest and later incarceration by a ‘kangaroo court’ of Leo Wanta, the loss of his funds and freedom, and his subsequent extended, unlawful probation, was just one year.

In short, if we consider the foregoing realities, we can present the following analysis of what the results of this intended malevolent ‘spook putsch’ will be for Ambassador Wanta and Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., personally:

1. IF the removal of Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., as Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., were to take place, it would represent a quid pro quo (blackmail) agreed to by Lee E. Wanta and the relevant authorities, for the Lee Wanta Settlement to be paid directly to Lee E. Wanta, in violation of the foregoing agreements between the two parties, as we understand the position.

2. The agreed upon US tax payment of $1.575 trillion on the repatriated funds of $4.5 trillion is evidently to be paid into an unknown Master Custodial Account via electronic transfer, with a signed acknowledgement of the tax payment by Lee E. Wanta.

•This SMELLS of the CERTAINTY that the intention here may be to DEFRAUD the U.S. taxpayer and the US Treasury of the benefits of the $1.575 trillion, a.k.a., TO STEAL THE TAX PAYMENT (as was evident when we exposed the secret, monitored meeting last year in Washington, DC at which US agencies were overheard dividing up the $1.575 trillion and by-passing the Treasury).

• Clearly, if Ambassador Wanta were, even unwittingly, to participate in such an arrangement, he may risk becoming immediately liable himself to having been set up as a party to a staged criminal conspiracy to deprive the US Treasury and the American people of the benefits of the $1.575 trillion initial ‘windfall’ tax, which should accrue to the exclusive benefit of the US taxpayer.

• On the face of what we know, therefore, Mr Wanta must surely exercise extreme caution here – and should turn down this proposal IMMEDIATELY. Payment of the tax to the US Treasury will need, we understand, to take place in the formal presence of Internal Revenue Service agents and Gold Badges, not least because the Ambassador will need maximum protection against any subsequent trumped-up allegation of tax evasion. These people are capable of ANYTHING – including turning the Ambassador’s own Misprision of Felony logic against him.

For there is nothing they would enjoy more than framing the Ambassador himself as an allegedly knowing co-conspirator in the theft of tax windfall funds from the US Treasury – a criminal act for which he could be indicted and jailed on conviction. At the very least, he could be made to appear to be an accessory to the fact of this crime. Our unsolicited advice, therefore, would be that any variation of the most straightforward and transparent arrangements for making the windfall tax payment, should be avoided like the plague.

3. It is understood that the ‘relevant authorities’ then ‘require’ Messrs Wanta and Cottrell to become involved in INTERNATIONAL financial agreements ONLY (NOT domestic transactions) via AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., with capital markets transactions (that should have been running since June/July last year) finally beginning.

We can then imagine, with the benefit of knowledge of past experience of how these people operate, the following scenario:

• Midstream of the Second or Third Tranche, it will suddnely be noted, that TAX PAYMENTS ON REPATRIATED FUNDS (given that ONLY international transactions are to be undertaken) HAVE NOT BEEN RECEIVED, and that there are sudden ‘irregularities’ in the financial arrangements made by AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., that directly implicate Messrs Wanta and Cottrell.

• Due to the apparent (but fraudulently contrived ‘by others’) activities now suddenly attributable to Messrs Wanta and Cottrell, an investigation is commenced by relevant Government authorities.

• Lee E. Wanta suffers a heart attack or a stroke (induced of course) or is involved in an accident, that precludes him from defending both himself and Mr Cottrell.

• Mr Wanta dies, and Mr Cottrell is convicted and jailed on trumped-up charges of fraudulent financial activities: AND THE MONEY DISAPPEARS.

THE AMBASSADOR HAS FOOLISHLY AGREED TO FALL INTO THIS TRAP
Unfortunately, Mr Wanta appears to have agreed to fall into this trap and to have Mr Cottrell removed as Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc..

Therefore, some such horrific personal scenario is liable to ensue – with the United States’ greatest patriot of our time, Ambassador Wanta, and the United States’ most respected private securities industry expert, Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., thereby punished for opposing the Bush Crime Family, the Clinton Crime Family, the world’s most notorious financial criminal, Dr Alan Greenspan, and Bush’s long-term MK Ultra handler, Richard Cheney, et al.

The way out of this horrendous situation is for the Group of Nine and the World Court to insist NOW that THE EXISTING CORPORATE ARRANGEMENTS AND APPOINTMENTS MUST STAND, whatever new preference the Ambassador, in his delusions, may harbour.

Failing that, the world faces a hideous disaster, because these criminal-minded cadres will STEAL EVERY PENNY OF THESE FUNDS. That is what they intend to do.

STRUCTURES ALREADY ESTABLISHED TO STEAL EVERY CENT
They have already, after all, set up a secret means of channelling all the IMF/Prosperity programme funds into the closed Central Bank financing carousel – setting up a ‘new’ foreign Central Bank (to replace the exposed and burned Central Bank of Iraq, the Editor believes), for the purpose.

This makes it abundantly clear that the scheme that they have persuaded, or are persuading, Ambassador Wanta to adopt, is indeed a FALSE PROSPECTUS. The Ambassador must wake up to this reality immediately, before it is too late, and he personally ushers in the catastrophe.

We understand that Mr Cottrell will not agree to being set up. As for the Editor, the Ambassador should understand that he will not be around to bail him out of jail or probation a second time.

There is ONLY ONE Michael C. Cottrell, M.S.

And there is ONLY ONE Christopher Story. The Ambassador needs finally to understand that none of his supposed intelligence community ‘friends’ did what the Editor of this service did. They didn’t have the guts, they were afraid, they were cowards, and they just at and watched. They are full of hot air. Their words, like those of Ms. Rice, are meaningless, as well as being duplicitous.

The Editor cannot imagine that the kindly Ambassador would be a party to any scheme which resulted in the double-crossing of the Editor of this service, and thus a reversion to the standard nefarious US intelligence model – taking everything, giving nothing, while mouthing empty and duplicitous niceties in the process.

And one can also imagine what Her Majesty The Queen’s response to any such unthinkable betrayal of two of the Ambassador’s only reliable friends, is likely to be.

The Queen would feel, not without good reason, that she has been betrayed, as well.

Notes:

(1). A ‘sib’ operation involves the perpetration of double-cross and scamming operations by the party least suspected of doing them. Thus, for instance, no ordinary person could imagine that the heirs of the Nazi Abwehr (counterintelligence), namely Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst, would be working hand-in-glove with a faction of Israeli intelligence at Dachau, the site of one of Hitler’s most notorious extermination camps for Jews, gypsies and others. But, that is a fact: it is the BIG SECRET, explaining why George H. W. Bush Sr., whose family is German Jewish by extraction, is or has been the head or US representative of the DVD, Dachau.

(2). Burning the evidence of this financial fraud, exposed by Wantagate, is becoming routine.

These fires recall the parallel fires at Iron Mountain warehouses that occurred, one after the other, in London and Ottawa on 12th and 13th July 2006, reported on page 14 of International Currency Review, Volume 31, Numbers 3 & 4. Specifically, as we reported at the time:

• A huge fire ripped through a six-storey Iron Mountain warehouse located at Twelvetrees Crescent, Bow, East London, on Wednesday 12th July 2006. About 100 firefighters attended the blaze, which was so severe that it was decided to let the blaze burn itself out. It was still smouldering three days later.

• Fire wrecked an Iron Mountain warehouse at Cyreville, Ottawa, Canada, on the next day.

London (UK) and Ottawa, Canada, are two centres through which a substantial proportion of questionable bank operations involving Ambassador Wanta’s stolen funds were transacted. Leo Wanta was framed and put out of contact and action in 1993 for an intended 22 years, and was pronounced dead within the US intelligence community and for the benefit of the co-conspiring banks. He re-emerged in 2005 and was then freed of all restrictions. During the 12+ years of his absence, certain institutions concluded, in tacit or explicit accord with various corrupt intelligence operatives, that the funds would never be claimed, and therefore proceeded to collateralise, cross-collateralise and otherwise ‘annexe’ the funds as though they were for the bank’s own account.

With the belated realisation throughout the international financial community that this illusion could no longer be sustained, following this Editor’s ‘wildcard’ action in paying for the Ambassador’s exit from probation in July 2005, panic may have gained the upper hand in certain quarters.

It appears that the growing panic may have prompted a decision deep within the recesses of the kleptocracy, to burn the records. For two Iron Mountain warehouses to burn down within 24 hours is manifestly no coincidence, given the background under consideration. The UK Iron Mountain warehouse stored a large number of files belonging to Deutsche Bank containing contracts for leveraged financial transactions. For fire to break out at such well-guarded end high-tech equipped warehouses, arson cannot fail to be the cause.

The fire that broke out at the Old Executive Office Building in Washington, DC, on 19th December 2007 was likewise deliberately set. It covered the extraction from that old building of documents believed to compromise the holders of highest offices in the United States. Although the Ottawa Sun newspaper described the Cyreville fire as ‘accidental’, the fact that it followed the London Iron Mountain warehouse fire by less than 24 hours suggested that this could not possibly have been the case. These fires have been hushed up.

LEGAL SECTION:
PLEASE READ THIS INFORMATION, AS IT INDICATES THE DEPTH OF THE DEPRAVITY THAT WANTAGATE HAS EXPOSED. REPETITION OF THIS BASIC DATA IS STILL NECESSARY…

• We now repeat, yet again, our familiar summary of the Statutes, securities regulations and fraud information that we have appended to these reports for many months. The reason we append this information is to remind everyone of their clear responsibilities under the US Misprision of Felony legislation, and of course to provide a legal basis for these reports.

LEGAL RECAPITULATION FROM REPORT DATED 30TH AUGUST 2007:
Reiteration of the fraudulent transactions involving Bank of New York Mellon – a bank so arrogant and conspicuously indifferent both to its tarnished reputation and to its grotesque breaches of US law and of N.A.S.D./S.E.C. Regulations, that it now takes first prize in the crowded competition for the title of ‘Most arrogant and corrupt financial institution in America’. At least, this was the case until the perpetration of the ‘Saturday scam’ described above and on 13th November:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• ‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON IS IN BREACH AND OF WHICH THE SIX ‘LEVY BANKS’ MAY LIKEWISE BE VARIOUSLY IN BREACH [CREDIT SUISSE, UBS, DEUTSCHE BANK, BANK OF AMERICA, CITIBANK, THE BANK OF ENGLAND]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is in violation of:
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR SIR LEO WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT THE HIGHEST U.S. LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006, AND HAVE CONTINUED THEIR SERIAL CRIMES EVER SINCE:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war

This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Wanta’s funds.

The Directors and others listed in Part 1 of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and others posted on 11th June may likewise be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious violation of the laws itemised above. This list is reproduced in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, September 2007, on pages 163-168.

DIPLOMATIC STATUS OF THE PRINCIPALS
The Ambassador and his colleagues now have special diplomatic status (conferred upon them by HM The Queen in 2007), which means that the Ambassador is now an Ambassador several times over. This factor greatly complicates the intended discrediting offensive that the mad US stupidity community’s Dark Forces contemplate, their sole objective being of course to cover up their own criminality, in line with pending ‘thought crime’ legislation which has the same Nazi-style objective.

• Note: ‘Kakocracy’: Governance by a clique representing the worst elements of society, in their interests and to the exclusion of all other interests, from the Greek, kakos, meaning foul, or filthy.

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier Wantagate reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

BUSH ON THE COUCH: VERDICT OF DR JUSTIN FRANK

THE RELEASE BY THE RONALD REAGAN LIBRARY OF PAPERS ON WANTA

Monday 25 February 2008 15:00

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for our ‘Wantagate’ reports since April 2006.

• The white panel below NEWS gives details of our intelligence titles as they are published.

• FORTHCOMING WANTAGATE ISSUE OF INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW: We are preparing a very extensive issue of the financial journal in which every stage of this crisis since June last year will be displayed. This issue will be mailed to subscribers worldwide in the first quarter of this year, and will provide a permanent record, which cannot be expunged, of the multiple twists and turns of this historically unprecedented criminalism crisis, with every sordid detail recorded both for immediate further enlightenment, for future study, and for posterity.

Not a single facet of this hideous crisis has been left out of the record, so that no attempt to cover up what has been going on, is possible. Subscribers will receive their issues under their current arrangements. Others who wish to receive this special issue should use the Contact Us facility on this website to ask for details and specify how many copies of this huge report/issue they would like to receive. Book early while stocks last. We will not be sending free copies: details on request. Order your copy EARLY! This is such a huge undertaking that we have to restrict the print run.

• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing financial global corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Our Wantagate reports have been calling all the shots, given the hijacking of Wanta’s Settlement.

• This is the 96th Wantagate report: well over a million words to date.

• BOOKS: ‘The Red Terror in Russia’, by Sergey Melgounov, is published by Edward Harle Limited and available via this combined website. It describes what the Dark Forces pulled off in Russia, and what they may have in mind for the United States and Britain (a.k.a. ‘the Main Enemy’) if we do not pull ourselves together. See also the Editor’s 740-PAGE book ‘The New Underworld Order’, for the detailed background on the World Revolution crisis that we are all living through.

• Note: Kindly keep on not shooting the messenger. The following report is based upon our best information and belief. If matters turn out differently, or the timeframe changes, as has occurred since 9th February, this will reflect developments AFTER collection of the intelligence contained herein. We have flies on walls all over the place, but sometimes they may be on the wrong walls, or the right walls at the wrong time. Abusive, rude and anonymous emails are forwarded to a separate box and are held with the option of exposing their provenance should we so decide. Which we may.

U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: MISPRISION OF FELONY:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

ABOUT THE SETTLEMENT(S)
The Editor has a great deal of further information relating to the Settlement(s), and to the reasons for the ‘on again, off again’ Group of Nine sanctions against the United States. Plainly, as at least some people appear to have understood, the lack of open information to date on the application of the sanctions package can be explained by just two alternatives:

1. The Group of Nine (now 20) have ‘backed off’ (not true).
2. The Settlements are in the process of being finalised.

We are not prepared, for reasons we cannot go into at this juncture, to elaborate further at this stage, but will do so when circumstances permit. We did point out that the messenger should not be shot, given the extreme levels of international tension and fluidity surrounding this crisis, which is without precedent in world history – a simple, clear request which has failed to prevent certain despicable anonymous cowards, who do not reveal their coordinates and so have something to hide (unlike this Editor), from taking pot shots at the messenger. We naturally reserve the right, at the appropriate time but not before, to post such messages on this website.

We do not have a contract with anybody to post anything. Therefore, emails demanding to know why we have not posted, are superfluous. We do of course appreciate the multiple kind messages of support. The Editor’s decision on all matters connected with these Wantagate reports, is final, including his decision whether to post or not. Since the Editor publishes the specialist publications and books advertised on this website, he does have other things to do apart from satisfying the curiosity of those demanding further reports and sometimes complaining if there has been a gap. Why should there not be a gap?

We are not beholden to anybody: THAT IS THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS SERVICE.

Since we prefer, for the moment, to withhold the incomplete information that we have gathered in a very large file since mid-February on Wantagate and the Settlements and their association with the global financial ‘reforms’, the Editor posts herewith two previously published essays which throw light on the background to these and related events. These are as follows:

• THE RELEASE BY THE RONALD REAGAN LIBRARY OF CERTAIN PAPERS
CONCERNING AMBASSADOR LEE EMIL WANTA:
Text of the Editor’s essay introducing the Wanta documents, published in a special Supplement issued with International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 1 & 2

• BUSH JR. ANALYSED ‘ON THE COUCH’ –
AND FOUND BY DR JUSTIN FRANK TO BE UNFIT TO HOLD OFFICE
A précis by the Editor of ‘Bush on the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President’, by Justin A. Frank, MD [Regan Books, Harper/Collins Publishers, New York, 2004, ISBN 0-06-073670-4]. Given the cesspit of controversy that has surrounded and engulfed this schizophrenic, it is well worth reading Dr Frank’s analysis, especially from the perspective of the dramatic events since this report was first published in January 2005.

• Note: Prior to, during and following George W. Bush’s visit to Africa in February 2008, a sharp increase was noticed in the instances when Bush appeared on TV. In the ‘former’ Soviet Bloc states, and in dictatorships to this day, it was and is ‘de rigeur’ for the controlled press to display a photograph of ‘the Dear Leader’ on the front page, every day.

The sudden wall-to-wall television coverage of George W. Bush was reminiscent of this well-known syndrome. His repeated appearances were being orchestrated by the official propaganda apparat, to convey the message that, despite George Bush II having again signed his resignation papers (in February), he was still around, still ‘in charge’, and still changing his mind in his familiar cynical Leninist fashion. The announcement that his Presidential Library would cost $200 million did not, of course, raise eyebrows among the controlled ‘mainstream’ media, let alone provoke any of their number to question the source of such funds (stolen off-balance sheet monies, naturally).

Both these essays are the copyright of World Reports Limited, London. Requests for reproduction must be addressed to the Editor, whose decision will be final.

• THE RELEASE BY THE RONALD REAGAN LIBRARY
OF CERTAIN PAPERS CONCERNING AMBASSADOR LEE EMIL WANTA:
Text of the Editor’s essay introducing the Wanta documents, published in a special Supplement issued with International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 1 & 2

Last spring, the National Security Agency (NSA) authorised the release of documents by the Ronald Reagan Library concerning Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta which serve the purpose of demonstrating that Leo (Lee) Wanta is exactly who he claims to be (which of course the Editor, having met and spent time with him on a number of pleasant occasions) can vouch for – namely, a top-level US Presidential spy who worked for many years directly for the President of the United States, whom he advised personally.

Release of these key documents exposed the then still ongoing (and occasionally reiterated by ignorant folk, to this day) farrago of crude disinformation and false witness concocted by criminal US intelligence cadres whose old lies, including that Leo Wanta was dead, were ridiculed when he surfaced in July 2005 after $35,000 (of this Editor’s private funds) was paid to the Wisconsin State Department of Corrections in order to settle the spurious Wisconsin civil tax assessment used to perpetrate his ‘takedown’.

These private funds were misapplied and also illegally applied by the corrupt Wisconsin State Department of Revenue – a matter to which the Editor is preparing to return decisively – but they did purchase the termination of the Ambassador’s illegal probation, which was ended when Mr Wanta was granted an Absolute Discharge effective 14th November 2005. Had it not been for this development, Wanta would have remained under illegal probation until 28th November 2010.

A selection of 40 pages of the released Wanta documents were published in a special Supplement which was distributed worldwide with International Currency Review, Volume 33, Numbers 1 & 2 [Third Quarter 2007]. These documents were preceded by the following essay, explaining the underlying rationale for the release of these papers:

THE RONALD REAGAN LIBRARY PAPERS ON AMBASSADOR WANTA
Showing that Wanta worked directly for the American President

• • Cynical calculations behind the National Security Agency’s
belated decision to release a first batch of Wanta papers

In the ‘old’, overt Soviet Union, Party hacks and operatives against whom the Party developed a grudge, or whom a rival wanted out of the way, were arraigned before a kangaroo court, excoriated publicly, made to suffer various painful forms of disgrace, banished to Siberia, or all of the above, at the whim of whichever ‘correlation of forces’ happened to be in the ascendant at the time. The alternative ultimate sanction, liquidation, was always held in reserve, in case torture or harassment had failed to achieve whatever Luciferian purpose the Party or the victim’s tormentor, had in mind.

Kremlinology – the science of identifying, by observing who was standing closest or next to whom during formal appearances of the power élite on the Kremlin Wall, as an indicator of who was in favour, increasing in favour, or falling out of favour – was developed over the years by Western observers, as a makeshift means of trying to make sense of the incessant power struggles that were presumed to be a permanent feature of political life inside the Kremlin. Basically, the further away from the dictator du jour a leadership operative stood, the greater the assumed likelihood that he would be liable to fall off his perch, and vice versa.

Rehabilitation was the process whereby someone in the Kremlin recalled that a previously disgraced Party figure and/or discarded intelligence operative, possessed information, skills or talents that could now be useful to the Party. Under ‘socialist legality’, there was never any substantive need to ‘right past wrongs’. Essentially, such a person would suddenly find himself back in favour, or enticed back by indications that this was the case, and his name would suddenly reappear in the controlled open media as though he had either never been absent, or had been engaged in important unannounced work for the Party. Either way, no further questions about the victim’s background or past errors was now permissible, as this previously disgraced individual had, all of a sudden, been ‘rehabilitated’.

THE VERB ‘TO REHABILITATE’
The verb to ‘rehabilitate’ implies something akin to what happens to a ‘retread’ car tyre. The tyre that had previously been split right down the seam, was now fit once again for its purpose, and so could be re-used as new. Rehabilitated Soviet Party personnel were often treated, by and large, as though nothing untoward had ever happened to them.

Given the close similarity between the way intelligence officers were liable to be mistreated in the overt Soviet Union and the standard behaviour of the US intelligence community when it ruthlessly decides that the services of one of its operatives are no longer required, it is appropriate to enquire as to whether Ambassador Leo Wanta – the top spymaster and taskmaster who served President Reagan personally – has been ‘rehabilitated’ in accordance with the Soviet model.

Under the Soviet model, it has tended to be assumed that the rehabilitee was the beneficiary of the Party’s need to reuse or exploit skills unique to the victim concerned: in other words, the de facto rehabilitation in this sense was represented as a ‘voluntary’ act on the part of, say, the Party. But the case of Ambassador Wanta is different.

In the summer of 2005, an early attempt was made by the dominant US criminal intelligence community to ‘rehabilitate’ Leo Wanta on its own terms. Specifically, after or roughly at the same time as the Editor had agreed to provide the funds for the purpose of ending the Ambassador’s illegal probation, Leo Emil Wanta was invited down to the Virginia area to meet with a Black US intelligence outfit calling itself Multi-Sector Crisis Management Consortium [MSCMC] [see page 149 of International Currency Review, Volume 31, #3 & 4].

The operatives at MSCMC attempted to persuade and entice the Ambassador, and Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., Executive Vice President and Treasurer of Leo Wanta’s Commonwealth of Virginia-based AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., to participate in dubious and/or illegal financial operations in collaboration with them and other criminal kleptocracy parties – thereby seeking to leverage his unique expertise for their own purposes.

The group further attempted to inveigle Mr Cottrell into dubious arrangements which would have compromised his own firm, Pennsylvania Investments, Inc.

WANTA WALKS ROUND THE TABLE, SEIZES THEIR NOTES, AND TEARS THEM UP
At one meeting which was electronically recorded, and at which various generals and intelligence officers walked in and out, talking on their mobile phones or writing notes, Leo Wanta stood up, walked round the table, removed the notes that various parties had been taking, tore them into shreds and placed them in the trash.

At such a level, intelligence officers are supposed to be able to recall everything and to have no need to take notes. On that occasion, too, the Transportation Security Agency (TSA) saw to it that the Ambassador’s suitcase did not arrive at the relevant Washington area airport, so that he was inconvenienced with no toiletries, night clothes or any change of clothing throughout the visit. When he returned to base, his suitcase was revolving on the luggage carousel.

On 14th September 2005, Michael Cottrell issued a Notice of Resignation to Multi-Sector Crisis Management, in which he elaborated: ‘Please be advised that the Private and Proprietary [name of] ‘Funding Proposal’ submitted, in good faith, signed, dated and duly executed under H.R. 3723, via email, to Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., to Mr Neil W. Thompson … for the Board of Directors’ review and consideration on 10 February 2005, is hereby withdrawn due to bad faith negotiations on the part of MSCMC et al. Further, MSCMC et al, individually and severally, are hereby notified that all members of the Board of Directors/Board of Managers, inter alia, will be held to the Private Agreement of confidentiality, destruction and non-proliferation, and/or use of said proprietary documents, subject to Title 18, USC, Sections 4, 35 and 1970, et seq., and H. R. 3723.

H.R. 3723: THE ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE ACT OF 1996
For the sake of further clarification, the relevant text referencing H.R. 3723, The Economic Espionage Act of 1996, is reproduced here [see also page 163 of International Currency Review, Volume 31, #3 & 4]:

‘Whereas, the President of the United States, having signed H.R. 3723 on October 11, 1996, has protected this transaction, by allowing corporations the right to declare their Contracts, Clients, Internal Procedures and Information, and the transactions they engage in as a Corporate or Trade Secret fully protected under Economic and Industrial Espionage Laws of the United States of America and the International Economic Community’.

‘Inasmuch, the names, identities, bank coordinates and other identifying information of persons or entities that are party to this transaction, contained herein, or learned [about] hereafter, shall be a Corporate Trade Secret that shall not be disseminated other than as provided for herein, or as allowed under applicable law. Any unauthorized Disclosure of this private Transaction, parties to, or other material fact of, shall subject the violators to Criminal Prosecution’.

The attempt by US criminal intelligence to ‘rehabilitate’ Ambassador Wanta for their own purposes therefore failed, after the Ambassador and Mr Cottrell became aware that some of the parties had stolen proprietary information and expertise, which falls under this Statute, from Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., and his private corporation, and from Ambassador Leo Wanta.

In other words, criminal intelligence, realising the process that was in train and that maintaining the lie that Leo Emil Wanta was dead would cause the CIA ever more convoluted problems, attempted to ‘rehabilitate’ the Ambassador in bad faith (their normal modus operandi); and the Ambassador quite properly refused to comply.

Over the subsequent two years, the steadfast resistance by the Ambassador and by Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., to all deceptive overtures, plus the exposures that we have been privileged to publicise in International Currency Review, in our associated publications and on our website, have radically altered the situation facing the criminal kleptocracy.

Mesmerised by their own greed for personal gain, and by the pressures of their secret agenda and associated New [Under]World Order funding requirements – and totally indifferent to the urgent necessity for The Wanta Plan to be implemented in order to rescue and refinance the US Treasury and economy – the criminal cadres persisted with the overt and covert exploitation of the financial Settlement that had been negotiated with and agreed by Ambassador Wanta and signed off formally in May 2006, without regard for the cumulative consequences.

These cumulative consequences have included the curious reality that the Rest of the World’s Governments and intelligence services have been made more fully aware of what has been going on, sizeable elements of the intelligentsia in the primary countries have also been informed, and Wantagate has run out of control while these people were busily enriching themselves.

So many cats have been let out of so many bags that the criminal gangsters and classes now face opposition (which they never anticipated) on an unprecedented scale that has been causing them real concern and inconvenience. Senior US officials were arrested during the week ending 15th June 2007, after yet another diversion of the Wanta funds and failure to execute.

PEOPLE WHO COULD HAVE HELPED JUST SAT BACK AND WATCHED
While Wantagate gathered momentum, officials, operatives and legislators in a position to provide assistance have sat back to watch ‘which side looked like winning’, instead of helping to procure the necessary outcome and to rescue the US Rule of Law from the Law of the Jungle, which the criminal classes prefer. So deeply has the criminality, extensively run out of Chicago, penetrated, that a senior Pentagon spy told this Editor in March 2005 that ‘it’s check mate’.

He was unaware, of course, that steps would be taken later in the year to procure the release of the Ambassador, who was supposed to be dead, from probation – so that the multiple lies that the CIA had perpetrated against him, constructed on top of the single egregious lie, disseminated to the international financial community, that Leo Wanta was dead, would begin unravelling, exposing the operations of the networks of the financial thieves in the process. And the pace at which the corruption nexus been unravelling, has accelerated ever since.

So, the original attempt to ‘rehabilitate’ the Ambassador on the criminal kleptocracy’s own terms having failed, what has actually happened in this regard?

The assessment of the Principals in mid-June 2007 was that the Ambassador’s ‘rehabilitation’, to the extent that we could discern that it was taking place, has been far from voluntary on the part of those doing the rehabilitating. On the contrary, the ‘Black’ criminal cadres have been forced by the preponderance of evidence exposing their endless corruption manipulations, to begin the process of rehabilitating Leo Wanta – not, it should be understood, to exonerate him, but rather to protect themselves, given the way things are going.

Since many of these people may well follow unspecified senior US officials to jail (without bail), any attempt to make the picture surrounding Leo Wanta look less murky from their perspective, may seem to be a waste of time. But that is the reality. These people have started to see the writing on the wall, and it makes disturbing reading for each and every one of them.

Just imagine: every single US operative who has been involved, in one way or another, including couriers and others, in dimensions of given financial corruption operations, from the highest level to the lowest, is in real jeopardy as a consequence of Wantagate.

The re-establishment of the Rule of Law in the United States and in the Group of Eight countries generally – which means, in practice, that stashing stolen or diverted funds resulting from the exploitation of other people’s money in offshore bank accounts, with no accountability for ‘source of funds’ – is exactly the opposite of the régime that the ‘Chicago’ crooks and their criminal intelligence associates have been exploiting and relying on all these years.

As a consequence, endless avalanches of ‘funny money’ have been diverted as the momentum of Wantagate has accelerated, into dubious collectivised receptacles called ‘Private Equity’ or Hedge Funds which, by mutually agreed Group of Eight special exemption, remain broadly unaccountable and unregulated; with further cascades of ‘funny money’ being switched to prospectively ‘non-compliant’ locations such as Albania, Iceland, Poland, Vietnam (the local stock market of which has risen by 500% since 2003), Northern Cyprus, Dubai and Vanuatu.

These funds represent ‘hot money’ that has been running away from the new, intended ‘Rule of Law’ system which will be re-established as the criminal cadres are progressively destabilized and forced to step back. They will not have been defeated, but will have been forced to adopt the Leninist tactic of ‘one step forward, two steps back’, to regroup and replan their global control strategy. We will have to continue facing these crooks head-on in the future.

GLOBAL CONTROL MOTIVATED BY THE CRIMINAL CLASSES’ OWN INSECURITY
This strategy of total world control, by the way, is fundamentally driven not only by Lucifer (‘the god of this world’) but by the criminalists’ own insecurity. Their crude assumption is that, just as they have perverted the US judiciary, they will get to control the international judicial system as well (Cheney et al have already demonstrated, in the course of Wantagate, their ability and willingness to bribe International Court of Justice personnel).

It is essential, they figure, for them to ‘own’ the judicial system worldwide, in order to assure their immunity from prosecution, lifetime jail, and worse.

In reality, of course, this is a delusion, since their mad blueprint for global hegemony omits to take account of the certainty that power and control will remain the permanent subject of dispute, so that The New Underworld Order will, by definition, be inherently grossly unstable, even anarchic – the opposite of their befuddled expectations.

• And that inevitable outcome conforms, of course, to the reality that the devil is the author not of peace, commonsense and good order, but of universal chaos, confusion and lies.

Lying and deceiving, as a way of life, is madness, as all lies decay, like plutonium.

CYNICAL MOTIVATIONS UNDERLYING THE RELEASE OF THESE DOCUMENTS
So, why, then, has the US National Security Agency (NSA) released, at such a very late stage, the 40 pages of documents concerning Leo Wanta from the Ronald Reagan Library which we reproduce in this Supplement?

It has already been pointed out that the objective is not to exonerate the Ambassador (he and his associates are doing a convincing enough job in that respect themselves) but rather to alleviate the pain being experienced by the criminal cadres as the truth cascades into the open and their serial financial corruption and other crimes and lies are exposed to the light of day.

In parallel with the release of these documents, certain lower-level US disinformation operatives, scum of the earth, have nonetheless continued retailing gross lies and disinformation about the Ambassador which have no substance. In one instance, lies about Leo Emil Wanta’s operations in Thailand have been the subject of disinformation. The lies being perpetrated here cannot be dealt with because the underlying subject matter is classified: which of course is why the handlers of the particular disinformation operative concerned selected the Thailand context for the purpose.

To those who are not sitting on their brains, such compartmentalised US disinformation agents condemn themselves and destroy their own credibility through their serial aberrations.

When the Editor asked why the lower-level US counterintelligence disinformation muck-rakers were being allowed to continue their serial disinformation and lies, which are simultaneously contradicted for instance by the recently released Ronald Reagan Library documents, the informed response was as follows:

• At strategic level, the criminal intelligence coordinators are being forced to develop a barrier so as to be able to separate themselves and their past actions from the muck-raking that they have long since ordered their subordinate disinformation operatives to perpetrate.

• The strategists cannot now acknowledge to their subordinate disinformation operatives that the Ambassador exists, that everything that he has said in public and that has been published about him by ourselves is true, and that the strategists know that the underlings are perpetrating and disseminating brazen lies in accordance with their handlers’ instructions.

• If they were to ‘come clean’ with their compartmentalised subordinate disinformation operatives, they would in so doing expose themselves and their own deviousness and lies.

• So the muck-raking disinformation agents were being allowed to continue perpetrating their filthy lies as though nothing has happened and as though the National Security Agency (NSA) has not, finally, authorised the release of key documents revealing that Leo Emil Wanta served the late Ronald Reagan, President of the United States, personally, reported to him directly, and was engaged for many years in Top Secret operations abroad on behalf of the President himself.

Specifically, since he was engaged in such international operations, he could not have been, and was not, either resident or taxable in the State of Wisconsin.

COULDN’T BE SEEN PAYING $4.5 TRILLION TO A DEAD LIAR AND SCUMBAG
A further crucial consideration is also felt to be relevant. This is that, having lied for 15 years that Ambassador Leo Wanta was dead, having embroidered innumerable fabrications about him and repeatedly borne false witness against him, and having cynically prepared the disinformation upon which the perjured evidence and false witness fed to the Wisconsin kangaroo court that convicted him was based, the US criminal intelligence officials faced a problem in that paying him the $4.5 trillion that was agreed under the May 2007 Settlement might (so their thinking presumably goes) subject them to severe criticism for remitting such a large sum of money to an operative whom they had previously asserted to be dead, about whom they have consistently lied for 15 years, and who is falsely described as a felon, when he had committed no crime against US or Wisconsin State law or regulations at all, and has in fact been the victim all along of an orchestrated ‘takedown’ based upon a false State tax assessment which this Editor has proved definitively to have been spurious from the outset – with the tax authorities’ own paperwork demonstrating the fraudulence of their civil tax assessments and long-range offensive against this man, whom they themselves acknowledge to be a diplomat, and the holder of a recognised Diplomatic Passport (DPP). [See updated section on the Wisconsin Department of Revenue in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #1 & 2; and since then, the ‘Wisconsingate’ posting dated 6th August 2007 for details].

Given this bind in which they found themselves, someone inside the NSA finally decided that release of the Ronald Reagan Library documents on Leo Wanta would be appropriate. In other words, someone who, like so many others, had been watching to see ‘who will win’, realised that the time had come to start to build a barrier between the lies and the truth, even though it is far too late for any high-level exoneration.

That, in general terms, is why the Ronald Reagan Library has released these tell-tale documents which prove (not that such proof has ever been needed) that Leo Emil Wanta is exactly who he says he is. In other words, the quasi-rehabilitation has been forthcoming due to the pain that the criminals are suffering, not because of a sudden outburst of goodwill towards the Ambassador. Goodwill? The criminal kleptocracy can’t even spell the word.

ABOUT THE DOCUMENTS
The 40 documents that have been released by the Ronald Reagan Library, following clearance by the National Security Agency (NSA), were displayed on pages 7-47 of the ICR Supplement. A brief caption is given beneath each document to place it in such context as was available to the Editor of this service. In some cases, there is hardly anything on the page. However each page tells its own, and part of, the overall story – which is that because of the provenance of these documents, all lies and disinformation perpetrated about Lee Emil Wanta are hereby discredited. ENDS.

Copies of this International Currency Review Supplement, displaying the released Leo Wanta documents may be ordered from this website, for a donation of $50.00. Press ‘Please make a Donation’ at the head of this or any recent Wantagate report. Note: We are a commercial enterprise, operating with no subsidies, and the Wantagate dimension has been financed throughout by the Editor’s private publishing business. Hence, we cannot provide any services, apart from these posted reports, free of charge.

BUSH JR. ANALYSED AND FOUND TO BE UNFIT TO HOLD OFFICE
INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW [ISSN 0020-6490], VOLUME 30,
NUMBERS 2 & 3 JANUARY 2005, PAGES 59-68

A précis by the Editor of ‘Bush on the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President’, by Justin A. Frank, MD [Regan Books, Harper/Collins Publishers, New York, 2004, ISBN 0-06-073670-4

INTRODUCTION: ABOUT THIS ESSAY
In the autumn of 2004, the Editor read a remarkable book by Dr Justin Frank entitled ‘Bush on the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President’ by Justin A Frank, MD [Regan Books, HarperCollins Publishers, New York, 2004. ISBN 0-06-073670-4].

He prepared the following précis of the book, which was published in the Wantagate issue of International Currency Review released in January 2005. Dr Frank’s finds remain of exceptional interest given the absolute chaos that President George W. Bush has inflicted domestically and abroad, his unfettered criminal behaviour, his ruthless and murderous foreign adventures (1.5++ million dead in Iraq, for instance), and the colossal waste of money that his aggressive instincts – clearly traced and elaborated upon by Dr Frank – have perpetrated.

Dr Joseph Stiglitz, the distinguished former Chief Economist at the World Bank, estimates in his new book, ‘The Trillion Dollar War’, written with Linda Bilmes and published in Britain by Allen Lane, that Bush II’s reckless, illegal and utterly amoral assault on Iraq has cost – er – not just three trillion (that’s the estimated cost to the United States alone) but six trillion dollars altogether, because he reckons that the cost to the Rest of the World is the same again.

We have no doubt that President Bush II will be regarded by history (and probably much sooner) as the very worst President in American history – an accolade which, following the disreputable and ruthless criminal Clinton Administration, is ‘saying something’. But Dr Frank, like many others, saw such an outcome as inevitable – given the clearly unsavoury upbringing and background of this dangerously unhinged schizophrenic. It should be added that Dr Frank did not even BEGIN to mention the known occult dimension of the notorious Bush Crime Family.

The following analysis was published, as noted, in January 2005. The Editor has had occasion to direct enquiries to this essay on many occasions, and feels it timely to post this essay now. The President is still in office, still causing mayhem, still presiding over unfettered bribery, and, until very recently, still stealing money. The Editor’s essay was preceded by the following Note:

• One of the United States’ most respected professional psychoanalysts has ‘remotely’ subjected George W. Bush Jr. to psychoanalysis, and has found this man to be paranoid and dangerous. In a well-researched book, presented in very clear and jargon-free English, Dr Justin Frank took the President through his usual procedures. His findings are frightening, and should be taken very seriously. [Text dating from 2004-05].

THE CONTROVERSY SURROUNDING BUSH JR.
The truly unprecedented uncertainty into which the whole world has been thrown by developments in the United States, and by the conversion of Britain and the United States into disturbers of the global peace in stark contrast to the previously received international perception of these two leading nations as so-called paragons of ‘democratic virtue’, is further exacerbated by controversy surrounding the character of the President of the United States himself.

Since your correspondent has the highest regard for the intuitive capabilities of certain women who are known to him, it is appropriate here to record that when Mr George W. Bush Jr. was first ‘elected’, an American friend of the Editor expressed dismay and concern, notwithstanding her Republican and Texan roots, indicating her fear that this Mr Bush may turn out to be dangerous, or worse. Your correspondent had earlier been unwisely impressed by Laura Bush’s statement in a pre-election interview in which she had been asked about her husband’s ‘religion’, that ‘in 1988 a friend gave him a One-Year Bible’ (viz., a Bible in which the readings are divided into 365 sessions, one for each day of the year) ‘and he has been reading it ever since’. Given the grotesque, pagan debauchery characteristic of the Clinton period, this seemed to your correspondent to represent a considerable improvement. However it appears that the Editor’s friend was much more perceptive.

Work on George W. Bush’s personality and psychological make-up has been carried out remotely by an American psychoanalyst and psychotherapist, Dr Justin A Frank, and presented in his book, published many months prior to the 2004 Presidential Election, ‘Bush on the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President’ *. Dr Frank’s careful and candid analysis of the President’s mind concludes that he displays and has exerted an innate ability and tendency ‘to exert his destructive power on the world’, that he may turn out to be extremely dangerous, and that he should not be re-elected.

THE PRESIDENT’S INTERNAL CONFLICTS
Dr Frank interprets Bush’s mentality by reference to an endless internal battle that he perceives the President endures trying to cope with his anxieties. The author is not a Christian: in fact it is clear that he is, as one might expect, an atheist. He therefore excludes altogether any reference to possible occult influences in this President’s life – a serious omission, given that open reports indicate that they may permeate the family from which he sprang.

The gravity of this omission is all the more serious given allegations that George W. Bush Jr. was allegedly present at an occultic event years ago at which a number of the participants lost their lives. Nor is there any reference in this work to the voluminous evidence of alleged criminal wrongdoing by members of this powerful family, or to its alleged paedophilia and homosexuality.

Among the characteristics of this nevertheless engaging President’s background and psychological make-up which Dr Frank highlights, are these:

• The influence of the privileged, secretive family into which he was born, and its decisive impact on his view of the world, including a simplistic Ariosophist division of the world into good and evil.

• The lasting influence that early fantasies and hurt feelings may have had on his precepts.

• The prevalence of aggressive tendencies, and the sometimes sadistic ways they are unfortunately expressed in his behaviour.

• His attempts to seek escape from his internal turmoil through substance abuse (mainly alcohol in the past), exercise and pre-packaged ‘religion’.

• His relationships with authority figures, both individual and institutional.

• Impaired abilities to mourn, to admit responsibility and to know himself, all of which Dr Frank says are necessary for psychological growth.

• His unwillingness to be, let alone to admit to being, wrong, or to consider divergent perspectives.

• Inconsistencies between his words and actions.

• Inconsistencies between his words and truth.

President Bush seems to recognise that he is an oddity, as he is on record as having remarked: ‘Don’t spend a lot of time trying to figure me out… I’m just not into psychobabble’.

Much the most commendable characteristic of Dr Frank’s book, however, is the clarity of the plain English in which it is written, and thus the absence of psychobabble, which makes it so accessible.

THE EARLY BEREAVEMENT
Indicative of Bush’s impaired psychological background is what happened after George, who was the eldest child, discovered that his little sister, Robin, who had been diagnosed with leukaemia in the spring of 1953, had died. Following that diagnosis, the child’s fearful parents underwent a series of extended East Coast trips in an ultimately fruitless pursuit of treatment.

Dr Frank thinks that George suffered badly because he was never told the reason for the sudden absences. Unaware that Robin was ill he was simply ordered not to play with the sister to whom he had become close, on her occasional visits home. After Robin had died in New York in October 1953, her parents spent the next day golfing in Rye.

Mrs Barbara Bush has evidently written revealingly about her experiences as both a mother and a child, so that Dr Frank possessed ample information about her history. Referred to by her offspring as ‘the Enforcer’, Barbara Bush has by her own admission always been the family disciplinarian.

‘She was, by most accounts, a cold disciplinarian, and she spanked the children readily’.

Called “the one who instills fear” by a close family friend, she would boldly break up fights between her sons, “bust them up and slap them around”, according to a brother-in-law. In later years, Mrs Barbara Bush has not lost her willingness to display her own aggressive tendencies before the whole world. For instance, many observers, including Dr Justin Frank, were stunned when she told viewers during an interview in 2004 on the prime-time US TV show Larry King Live that ‘you can criticise me, but do not criticise my children and do not criticise my daughters-in-law and do not criticise my husband, or you’re dead’.

Sensitive US observers whom we respect most, and your correspondent himself, did not believe this outburst to be a mere figure of speech. In Britain, it is still a criminal offence to utter threats. Apparently this is not the case in the United States – a fact which illustrates a telling distinction between the two civilisations. We all thought she really meant it.

The author reveals that Mrs Bush was herself treated harshly by her ‘striking beauty’ of a mother, who paid little attention to the normal aspects of maternal life associated with traditional nurturing. The impression gained is that of distance between mother and daughter, a condition that Mrs Bush clearly passed on in her own family.

A LOT TO LIKE ABOUT GEORGE W. BUSH
Dr Frank relieves all the initial gloom by observing (and we certainly agree) that ‘there’s a lot to like about George W. Bush. Even his detractors during the 2000 campaign praised his humour, humility and general affability. His playful friendliness and informality have often disarmed his many critics and charmed the media; he winks and kids around, jokes with reporters on the campaign trail, and peppers his unprepared remarks with great humour’.

The author’s own researches suggest that children who lose a sibling may react by taking it upon themselves to cheer up their grieving mother, whose hair turned white during the years after the loss of Robin, and whose pain at the child’s loss, Dr Frank believes, was conveyed in spades to George through a stern, restricting facial expression.

George Bush Jr. was known as ‘Bushtail’, always on the go – a condition that today would arouse suspicions of hyperactivity. This may have reflected, in part, the child’s need to externalise his own unintegrated anxieties.

‘Complex thinking cannot take place if the child is unable to regulate his feelings. The child [who is] consumed by negative feelings, or distracted by the enormous effort required to handle them with merely primitive psychological tools, cannot get beyond his desperate need to manage his unmanageable anxiety; thus overwhelmed, the child may well experience any external input as excessive. The premium placed on internal order may thus leave no room for growth’.

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) ranks today as the most common neurobehavioural childhood disorder, according to the American Academy of Paediatrics.

Dr Justin Frank reported ‘that much of what we know of the adult Bush’s work habits and mental practices conforms to various indicators of ADHD.

The two worst problems for adults with this condition are impulsivity and craving.

‘Impulsive behaviour is often mistaken for decisiveness, but in reality the quick decision is often made because the individual is too impatient to sustain his attention long enough to read all the information, or else much too uncomfortable at the prospect of complex thought to weigh things sufficiently’. A U.S. News and World Report mentioned Mr Bush’s aides during his first term as saying that he ‘never agonises over decisions, preferring to gather information, make a decision, and move on’.

The psychoanalyst recalls that the President ‘is known for keeping a strictly regimented daily routine, in which short, heavily scheduled workdays with brief meetings are punctuated by regular breaks for exercise. Some would praise this as evidence of a disciplined mind, but it points equally to a desire to minimise the impact of a short attention span, and to avoid the impulsive behavior that can otherwise result.

As the commentators Eric Alterman and Mark Green have both reported, Mr Bush’s ‘advisors have admitted that the staff usually limits him to just three or four 30- to 45-minute ‘policy time’ sessions per week, about what Bill Clinton engaged in per day. Then, more often than not, the President sloughs off responsibility with the admonishment, “You guys decide it”’.

STICKING OUT HIS TONGUE
The book has a mass of revealing information about Bush’s impulsive behaviour. As the Governor of Texas, having summoned a Forestry Service official to the podium to talk about forest fires by shouting ‘Tree man, get up here!’, Bush looked round at the journalists while he talked, ‘stuck out his tongue and made a funny face by puffing up his cheeks like a blowfish’. The author points out that such impulsive, hair-trigger responses to real and perceived threats are common with people with ADHD, who often act before determining whether the threat they perceive is in fact genuine.

They also tend to do the opposite – responding to feeling threatened by choosing to hide or to escape. Thus Bush dabbled in many things before arriving at Harvard Business School, by which time he ‘had a taste of many different jobs but none of them ever seemed to fit’.

In his examination of the President’s personality, the author stresses that his behaviour is highly relevant because of the political ramifications – which, we would add, the whole world is about to see. ‘His defensive measures not only reflect conflicts within his character; they can also cause serious problems that can have a severe impact on the quality of his leadership – and on the quality of our lives’.

People who have known Mr Bush in the past have often said that while he appeared to be affable, in fact his affability hides a distance. ‘As an intelligent person whose access to his intelligence was hampered by disabilities, Bush compensated for his flaws by developing other talents, such as his sense of humor and his uncanny ability to memorize names and faces. People with untreated ADHD can have difficulty functioning as members of a social group, because they find it hard to follow substantive discussion and social interaction’, as Mr Bush’s first Treasury Secretary, Paul O’Neill, discovered whenever he appeared for his weekly briefings with the President. Mr O’Neill noticed at once that Mr Bush was not in the slightest interested in anything he had to say, and that he suffered from EGO (Eyes Glaze Over) throughout their meetings.

Thanks to the diligence of Dr Frank, we now know that Mr O’Neill’s experiences with the President reflected Mr Bush’s short attention-span associated with his ADHD. The author elaborates: ‘Finding it too hard to grasp thoughts coming from multiple directions’, ADHD sufferers ‘often resort to telling jokes and disrupting the proceedings; they content themselves with being one of a group of fun-loving people, and avoid more serious interaction’. So, as a consequence, Paul O’Niell was asked in December 2002 to ‘activate’ the presigned resignation letter which every high office-holder in the United States is required to sign as a condition of his appointment.

An ambitious child with ADHD has to be a leader in order to be a group member, otherwise he can’t be heard, since in a subordinate position no-one would take his outbursts seriously. And indeed, with this man, they need to. Sometimes, it appears that it is not George W. Bush Jr., but something else that is speaking. For instance, on 11th May 2001, he pronounced in Washington that ‘there’s no question that the minute I got elected, the storm clouds on the horizon were getting nearly directly overhead’. We would agree. And on 13th August 2002, speaking at Waco, Texas, of all places, Mr George Bush Jr. remarked: ‘I firmly believe the death tax is good for people from all walks of life throughout our society’.

Reverting to the child-rearing dimension of his studies, Dr Frank speaks of the importance of the breaking and repairing of bonds, which is an essential and normal component of child rearing.

‘In healthy relationships, a pattern is established where the mother understands the pain and shame she has caused, helping the child to regulate his own feelings over time. But hyperactivity can get in the way of this process. Bush’s attitudes suggests that his childhood involved little experience of breaking and repairing; his inability to express contrition, or admit wrongdoing, bespeaks a profound need to deny the possibility of his shame’.

The basic rhythm of ‘breaking and repairing’ also teaches the child that a negative experience can be followed by something positive; in the process, the child learns to tolerate what is bad without having to react violently. But, says Dr Frank ominously, ‘this also seems to be missing from Mr Bush’s repertoire. When a child doesn’t experience relief from his distress, he frequently reacts by defiantly denying outside help or influence, developing a false, grandiose sense of independence’.

GRANDIOSITY AND CARDBOARD FIGURES
Enter the condition of grandiosity which, along with shame, Dr Frank says are symptoms of the learning-disabled person’s inability to construct an internal world that reflects the complexities of life. ‘Such a child’s inner world must be simple, because complexity causes anxiety; when shame is unresolved, compensatory grandiose self-images are allowed to thrive, and magical thinking spawns unrealistic notions that flourish unchallenged’.

Accordingly the material world is simplified to conform to the person’s internal worldview.

This oversimplified grasp of reality implies that the President’s world is populated by cardboard figures who are either enemies or friends (‘doing a good job’). Bush’s notorious references to GRU-President Putin – a ruthless military intelligence officer – have been alarming. First, the President said that he had seen into Putin’s soul when looking into his eyes, as a result of which experience his impression of Putin was positive. However anyone looking into Putin’s soul had better beware; and looking into his eyes would probably be ill-advised, as well.

George Bush wrapped up this assessment by asserting that Putin was ‘willing to wear a cross’, the implication being that this covert Leninist liar must be a ‘good man’ if he’s wearing a cross. In fact, wearing crosses is one of the more grotesque mini-deceptions perpetrated by the covert Soviet Leninists who have been masquerading as ‘reformed’ characters these past 15 years. Thus the late Mrs Raisa Gorbachëv wore a very large cross, even though she and her husband were professed agnostics, and Gorbachëv is Jewish, with a family name of Orbach or Korbach. Stalin II, as MVD Eduard Shevardnadze, the Soviet gauleiter of Georgia, was referred to, had himself christened ‘St George’, for some reason no-one could ever fathom.

The false churchman doing the ‘christening’ was the Catholicos-Patriarch Ilya II of Georgia, who has been a prominent KGB operative since 1962.

An alarming corollary to Mr Bush’s habit of gross factual oversimplification when he is judging between ‘enemies’ and ‘friends’ is that this characteristic was integral with the Ariosophical outlook which formed a key component of the psychological environment within which Nazism took root and thrived. Hitler’s early years in Vienna were disturbed by his dislike of the chaotic polyglot capital city of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, where so many minorities and Jews cohabited. (Also present with Hitler in Vienna in 1913 were Stalin, Lenin and Trosky). The antithesis to that thesis was the ‘pure Aryan’ Germany across the border.

President George W. Bush has demonised the Iranian Islamic régime, which is controlled by an Azerbaijani (President Khatami), masquerading as an Iranian, just as Tehran has demonised the United States as ‘the great Satan’. Hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people, may die as a consequence of these dangerous oversimplifications.

THE FORMER ALCOHOLIC
Dr Frank next tackles the question of Bush’s ‘former’ alcoholism, beginning with the question: is he still drinking? The author was (in 2004/05) uncertain about this, noting a number of occasions when the President’s speech has sounded slow and excessively deliberate, in the way that certain secret drinkers sometimes talk to hide their inebriation.

Just before the start of the Iraq War, Tom Shales wrote in The Washington Post, astonishingly, that ‘the President may have been ever so slightly inebriated’.

On other occasions, the President appears to have made up stuff (confabulation); and examples are mentioned. Confabulation ‘is a common phenomenon among drinkers, as is perseveration, which is evident in Bush’s tendency to repeat key words and phrases, as if the repetition helps him to keep calm and stay on track’.

On balance, however, Dr Frank comes to the conclusion that President Bush is what is known in his trade as a ‘dry drunk’ – someone whose alcoholism has not been treated, but has been supplanted by another addiction. Dr Frank asserts that in President Bush’s case the ‘replacement’ addiction is ‘religion’, which Mr Bush ‘got’ after a walk with the ‘Rev’ Billy Graham (allegedly a 33rd degree mason!) on the beach at Kennebunkport in 1985.

Whether this ‘conversion’ has any basis in reality we strongly question. Evangelism is not the way to find Christ. The Billy Graham way of suddenly committing oneself to Jesus Christ has been found to be almost wholly useless: apparently less than 5% of those who ‘choose for Christ’ at those Billy Graham-type sessions, remain committed in their new faith.

True commitment comes though Faith, leading to Grace, which in turn leads to the reading of Scripture and thence changes in attitude and way of life.

In Mr Bush’s case, it is much more likely that the ‘born-again’ religion that he supposedly clings to represents the replacement addiction for his alcoholism. The fact that as Governor he presided over more executions than any other Governor in US history is entirely inconsistent with True Christianity, even though Texans often justify this behaviour as being authorised by the Old Testament. But in reality, the Old Testament was torn up when the vail of the Temple was rent in twain, and was replaced by the New Testament, or Will – which no more sanctions the taking of human life than do the Ten Commandments. Under any circumstances.

On the other hand, there is nothing inherently unnatural about Mr Bush’s reported reliance on his faith for ‘protection’. According to the atheist Dr Frank, ‘the faith that comes from identification with an omnipotent figure restores a sense of inner peace, protecting the believer from feelings of helplessness or powerlessness’.

This cynical observation is included here merely because it forms part of Dr Frank’s diagnosis: as an acknowledged atheist, he must be assumed to have no knowledge of ‘the peace of God which passeth all understanding’ [Philippians Chapter 4, verse 7].

TERRORISM – THE REVOLUTIONARY ALIBI
The world of invisible terrorist threats, from a cynical international intelligence fabrication called Al-Qaeda, lends itself to the kind of grotesque mental oversimplification which Dr Frank diagnoses as characteristic of the President’s mentality. It doesn’t matter who the enemy is – the ‘former’ CIA operative Tim Osman morphed into Osama Bin Laden, the spooky scourge of humanity posing in a bathrobe and a beard whose appearance in planted videos made, it is alleged, in Las Vegas, is reiterated whenever the scareism propaganda needs to be ratcheted up to mask a particular nasty incident associated with the global gang warfare called the intensified intelligence war; or Saddam Hussein; or terrorists in general. No matter, Mr Bush Jr. is enabled by his ‘faith’ to see himself as the force of light against darkness. The problem with this chronic delusion is that the President presides over a régime of pitch darkness, elements of which are re-exposed in this issue.

No-one who has been exposed to the swirling lies, evasions, barrages of diversionary “lines” and official disinformation surrounding 9/11 and the US ‘war on terrorism’ – which was being ‘waged’ internationally three decades and more ago, after the Soviets relaunched the global terrorism dimension of the World Revolution – believes a word that the US authorities have ever said about Osama Bin Laden, the ‘former’ CIA operative Tim Osman.

The President no longer mentions him, of course, because, he died in a US hospital on 26th December 2001. This FACT somewhat undermined the integrity of the assessment published by Michael Ruppert, a US operative, police and intelligence investigator and author, who says, in his book ‘Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire and the End of the Age of Oil’ [New Society Publishers, Gavriola Island, BC, Canada, 2004, ISBN 0-86571-540-8], ‘I believe that Bin Laden was, and remains, a CIA/US Government/Wall Street asset. That would explain why he has never been caught. There are still wars to fight’.

‘He can’t be caught for a variety of other reasons, including his family’s enormous and diverse financial connections to the same élites that control the United States’ financial system, and his close interrelationship with a Saudi ruling class that could pull the plug on the US economy…. Osama Bin Laden also knows way too much, and without him, the Bush Administration would have had no excuse for any of what it has done over the last four years. From a strategic point of view, Osama is Dick Cheney’s best friend’.

(All highly embarrassing, given that, as we state above, Osama died on 26th December 2001).

‘Any Saudi assault on the US economy would weaken the United States’ mad efforts to be the last standing contestant in Peak Oil’s deadly game of musical chairs’ [Note: This service does not subscribe to the probably mistaken ‘Peak Oil’ theory, which this intel author endlessly promotes – Ed.]. ‘All we really have left is a beleaguered and overextended military. The military depends upon economic power that is now slipping through the Empire’s hands as rapidly as water through a sieve’ – an interesting premonition of the run on the US dollar which has followed the November 2004 Election. ‘Although the US military is by far the most powerful in the world, it is not more powerful than the world’.

Some 40,000 people did not turn up for work at the World Trade Center on 11th September 2001, unless far more people lost their lives (were sacrificed) than we have been told (which this Editor believes, by the way, to be the case). Your correspondent discovered in late October 2001 that the smell of rotting flesh was nauseating even as far away as our Midtown Manhattan offices, and that the situation was little changed in February 2002: so there remains a strong suspicion in his mind that the numbers actually murdered on 9/11 were far larger than reported.

Our attempts to obtain a list of the tenants of the Twin Towers from their owners, Silverstein Properties, were unproductive. And did you know that the damage inflicted internally at the World Trade Center in 1993, when the first ‘Reichstag Fire’ operation at the huge office complex was attempted, was never repaired? On the contrary, the damaged basement area was left unattended, placed out of bounds by a police cordon. Someone had evidently decided that it would be a waste of money to repair the area.

We wonder why. It is extraordinary (though typical of all US political scandals) that the perpetrators of this ‘Reichstag Fire’ event have succeeded, with impunity, in orchestrating the presentation of events so confusingly, and despite so many ‘smoking gun’ clues that there was inside US official complicity. Which could not have achieved its objective without the complicity of the United States’ controlled and rotten media.

We need not reiterate here the wealth of open information about the extended Bush family’s allegedly ‘dodgy’ background. Dr Frank covers this point well in a single sentence (although he does have much more to say on this subject): ‘Bush was born into a family that was simultaneously of the law and above it, steadily accruing power to legislate even as its actions moved further from the law’. And the family’s true attitude to opposition was encapsulated in the threat uttered by Mrs Barbara Bush during that notorious televised interview with Larry King Live.

Innumerable works have been published which explore the Bush ‘crime’ family’s background. But the US historian Kevin Phillips has summarised all this in his book American Dynasty, described by Dr Frank as ‘a damning and invaluable historical look at the familial influences on our President’s psyche’. ‘Four generations of building towards dynasty’, Mr Phillips observes, ‘have infused the Bush family’s hunger for power and practices of crony capitalism with a moral arrogance and backstage disregard of the democratic and Republican traditions of the US Government’.

Well, of course: if one’s primary preoccupation as an alleged hyperactive serial criminalist, apart from the further accumulation of wealth, may be to guarantee one’s own protection against arrest, indictment and disgrace, who cares about the United States’ traditions or the Constitution?

Several authors have concentrated on this President’s inability to distinguish fact from fiction, i.e. his propensity to lie, which has been reviewed in a number of recent books. David Corn (who may be an intelligence operative, representing here an anti-Bush faction), the author of one of them, The Lies of George W. Bush, writes thus: ‘So constant is [Mr Bush’s] fibbing that a history of his lies offers a close approximation of the history of his presidential tenure’.

Mr Corn says that the President’s tendency to be ‘economical with the truth’ is or was masked by the ‘honest-man routine’ which characterised his election campaign in 2000: but ‘a candidate who rises to power by denouncing the lies of others, warrants more attention when he himself engages in dishonest behavior’.

When Dr Frank looks into this dimension of the President’s behaviour, we discover something else disturbing; that he evidently doesn’t care – just as he doesn’t care about the 100,000+ Iraqis, the untold numbers of Afghanis, and the 150+ Texans for whose executions he is responsible.

‘The ease and frequency with which Bush misrepresents the truth’, writes Dr Frank, ‘gain new resonance when seen in the context of a personality that considers itself exempt from the laws that govern others. Why doesn’t he tell the truth? Because he doesn’t have to. Mr Bush gets away with lying not because he is good at it – he’s not – but because in his formulation there’s nothing to get away with: the laws of accuracy mean little or nothing to him’.

In this respect, there is of course little to choose between the lying former President Clinton – his fellow ‘Box Gang’ operative – and George Jr.

But it gets worse: ‘In this light, his simplified worldview is especially important. His capacity to identify and convey the truth relies upon a mental apparatus so primitive and misguided that he may well be unable to recognize his limitations and mistakes. Though there’s no way of knowing for sure – even for him – we’ve seen enough of his personality to suspect that he may actually believe many of his dubious claims; encumbered by a self-serving, underdeveloped way of seeing the world, he simply lacks the tools to differentiate telling lies from speaking the truth’.
Or, in other words, he ‘can’t help it’.

The analysis then considers some of the large litany of instances in which President Bush has defied the authority of truth. The author cited the instance of his military service and his profitable sale of Harken Energy stock in 1990, allegedly with the benefit of certain insider information. ‘He compounded his dishonesty by offering conflicting explanations and ultimately misrepresenting the conclusion of his run-in with authority, claiming to have been exonerated in correspondence from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that specifically said this was not the case’.

The technique of offering a large number of conflicting explanations to explain a given act of wrongdoing appears to have been learned from his own father, George Bush Sr. According to analysts, Mr Bush Sr. used this device following the ‘October Surprise’ operation [see page 99], under which the Iranians accepted $35 million in bribes (after some $27 million of the CIA’s bribery cash had been stolen by US actives engaged in the scam) in exchange for their agreement not to release the 52 American hostages captured in Tehran on 4th November 1979 until after the US Presidential Election scheduled for exactly one year later (4th November 1980), in order to guarantee the humiliation and defeat of the then- Democratic President Jimmy Carter, and the victory of Ronald Reagan and George Bush Sr.

The analysts say that George Bush Sr. had, by August 2003, offered as many as seven different and conflicting explanations as to where he was during a ‘missing’ 18-hour period, when he was flown to Paris for the negotiations and returned by supersonic aircraft to the United States before his absence could be noticed (which, however, it was)

INFLICTING PAIN WITHOUT FLINCHING
In a terrifying chapter called ‘The Smirk’, Dr Frank exposes the President’s sadism. ‘Long before he led our nation into war, George W. Bush exhibited an appetite for destruction. As a child, George Bush inserted firecrackers into the bodies of frogs, lighting the fuses and blowing the creatures up. As President of his fraternity at Yale, he used a branding iron to maim young pledges’.

This was, in fact, a reference to the fact that initiates of the occult secret society Skull and Bones at Yale are branded in the small of the back with the letter ‘D’, which stands inter alia for the Greek occultist Demosthenes, who committed suicide at an altar there in 322 BC (322 being of course the occult kabbalistic number of Skull and Bones – as well as (significantly) the area code for Brussels, the intended and de facto interim seat of World Government).

Bush Jr. characterised the hazing operation of ‘branding each initiate just above and in between the buttocks [sic] with the red-hot tip of a wire coathanger’ as equivalent to ‘only a cigarette burn’.

Dr Frank’s findings on this score can be summarised as follows: ‘As the Governor of Texas, he was observed smirking over the executions of death-row inmates, many of whom were later found to have received inadequate legal protection’.

‘Bush’s tendencies toward sadism now play out on a bigger stage, with more resounding results. He orders bombings in Baghdad and proudly shows off the horrifying photographs of the bodies of Saddam’s sons, almost daring the world to look away. He gets an even larger audience for the video footage of Saddam Hussein’s humiliation in captivity, and then demonstrates a very personal sense of triumph at his capture, and glee at the prospect of his execution’.

The US President’s trademark smirk, writes Dr Justin Frank, ‘makes his sadism easy to spot. In the Presidential debate of 2000, he displayed pleasure at the prospect of three Texas criminals being put to death: ‘Guess what? The three men who murdered James Byrd, guess what’s going to happen to them? They’re going to be put to death’.

This odious public remark, made without flinching, further illuminates Mrs Barbara Bush’s threat to Larry King, doesn’t it? At once arrogant and cowardly, that comment, accompanied by the smirk, put the whole world on notice that the act of inflicting pain – and the ‘good’ fortune of having a job that allowed him to do so within the laws of the State – brought Governor Bush a certain pleasure that he was unable to prevent himself from expressing.

Why, then, has there been such surprise at the heinous atrocities perpetrated by CIA operatives and Agency contractors in Abu Ghraib (and in innumerable other locations in Afghanistan, Jordan and on the British territory of Diego García), at the 100,000+ killed in Iraq and at the craven, boastful brutality and barbarism of US forces, as they work overtime to make America more ‘feared’ around the world? The United States is led by a man who, like all Luciferians, has learned to ‘inflict pain without flinching’, a man of fire and ‘peak of anger’.

Dr Frank’s verdict is damning indeed:

‘The Bush smirk conveys both the pleasure he derives from inflicting pain, and the defense he mounts against the discovery of that pleasure – a disclosure of the sadistic impulse, and an attempt to deny the destructive self he cannot bear to acknowledge’.

Dr Frank is fearful, and so are we, that this man will lead the world into the Third World War. He will, the psychoanalyst asserts, engage ‘the nation both as agent and victim in a perilous psychodrama that rages far beyond his control’.

We consider it our duty to draw our international subscribers to these extremely troubling realities.

THE MEANING OF HIS ‘BUSHISMS’
As for Bush’s ‘Bushisms’ – his convoluted misuse of language, his malapropisms – they can be and have been extensively mined for laughs: one can buy calendars with a Bushism a day for a few dollars. But Dr Frank says that his verbal gaffes and blunders are ‘symptomatic of a patient in dire need of help’. Yet, as noted earlier, some of these serial verbal faux-pas* seem to convey what the President actually means, as in: ‘Security is the essential roadblock to achieving the road map to peace’; or: ‘There’s no doubt in my mind that we should allow the world’s worst leaders to hold America hostage, to threaten our peace, to threaten our friends and allies with the world’s worst weapons’; or: ‘We need an energy bill that encourages consumption’.

To these Freudian slips the President adds other familiar verbal distortions – the bland repetition of phrases (as noted), techniques to deflect questions, evasive answers, the loss of coherence in tangential speech. Closer inspection ‘reveals that Bush doesn’t just struggle with language; he perverts it, in ways that reveal a capacity for indifference and contempt that reverberates far beyond the written word’.

And he is not afraid of contradicting himself. On 13th September 2001, the President suddenly pronounced: ‘The most important thing is for us to find Osama Bin Laden. It’s our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him’. But six months later, on 13th March 2002, after rather too many exposures leading to the general knowledge that Osama Bin Laden is none other than a ‘former’ CIA asset codenamed ‘Tim Osman’, Mr Bush said: ‘I don’t know where he is. I have no idea and I really don’t care. It’s not that important. It’s not our priority’.

Actually, Bush knew perfectly well where ‘he is’, since Osama died on 26th December 2001.

He’s in the place where Bush Jr. is himself destined. And he knows that place only too well: he more or less lives there.

*Note: But are the verbal faux-pas actually Bush Jr. speaking? Are his ‘Bushisms’ just ‘Freudian slips’? He shares this curious behaviour with his father. The Editor’s late friend Fr. Malachi Martin would say that both men are ‘possessed’, and the Editor would agree. If that is the case, the voice uttering these ‘Bushisms’ would be that of his ‘familiar’, or the words that come out of Bush’s mouth would be those dictated to him by his ‘familiar’ (or should we say, his ‘familiar du jour’). Because both men, on this perception, which is true, are likely to be possessed by ‘many familiars’:

Mark, Chapter Five, verses 6-9:
‘But when [the possessed] saw Jesus afar off, he ran and worshipped him.

And cried with a loud voice, and said, What have I [singular] to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of the most high God? I adjure thee by God, that thou torment me not.

For he said unto him, Come out of the man, thou unclean spirit.

And he asked him, What is thy name? [in exorcism, Evil Spirit must always be addressed by name. It is a mystery]. And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many’.

Luke, Chapter Eight, verses 28-30:
‘When he [the possessed] saw Jesus, he cried out, and fell down before him, and with a loud voice said: What have I [singular] to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of God most high? I beseech thee, torment me not.

(For he had commanded the unclean spirit to come out of the man. For oftentimes it had caught him: and he was kept bound with chains and in fetters; and he brake the bands, and was driven of the devil into the wilderness).

And Jesus asked him, saying, What is thy name? And he said, Legion: because many devils were entered in unto him’.

AN OEDIPUS WRECK?
Turning to the President’s fraught and dangerous relationship with his father in a chapter headed ‘Oedipus Wrecks’, Dr Frank identified fear of Bush Sr. and his ‘deep rivalrous and aggressive feelings towards his father’ which are manifest in bullying, often with sarcasm.

Without going into the details of this relationship here, the factor which we find by far the most alarming in this context is the younger Bush’s competitiveness – his drive to win at any cost, and his eagerness to be centre stage (similarly to his equally dark accomplice, Tony Blair).

The traditional oedipal dynamic involves the boy’s desire to surpass his father in the eyes of his mother. Yet ‘a man like George W. Bush seeks his father’s approval just as much as his defeat’. Elaborating this analysis, Dr Justin Frank reaches the following alarming conclusion:

‘George W.’s oedipal aggression toward his father is heightened by a defensive hostility, rooted in his fear of being humiliated for needing his father’s love and approval, that he directs elsewhere – often at the weak and needy, who remind him unconsciously of his own unacceptable needs [sic].

The result is an individual who is driven to impress, emulate, and outperform the father he unconsciously holds responsible for his own past and potential future humiliation. At the same time, he is highly motivated to unleash his very considerable destructive resources upon symbolic reminders of his father’s strength and his own weakness’.

On again, off again eports of a rift between Sr. and Jr., evident inter alia from the sacking of ancien régime holdovers, bear this out.

NON-ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY
The President told the (CIA-favoured) investigative intel author Mr Bob Woodward that the US Presidency means that he is no longer accountable to anyone for his actions. No-one tells him what to do. He tells others what to do. Dr Frank attaches importance to the President’s first speech to a joint session of Congress after 9/11, which began: ‘Why do they hate us?’, asking: ‘Who is Bush really talking about when he says ‘they hate us’? The analyst comes up with a disturbing response to his own question:

‘Given what we know about the inattentiveness of his parents – who the young ‘Bushtail’ understood to have rejected him – it’s easy to see how this indifference could have been transposed in his mind into hatred, projecting his unrequited longing onto other targets’. In that first post-9/11 speech, too, Mr Bush spoke of ‘sacrifice’ – which meant not only sacrificing so many young American lives that the funeral cortèges into Arlington Cemetery continue from morning to night, with the newly dug graves now spreading out far beyond the area originally intended for them – but also sacrificing free speech: you’re either with us or against us. This attitude reminds us of two young Americans we know who, before the second Iraq war, proclaimed, perfectly seriously, and with great anger, that ‘all Iraqis should be killed. Period’. Does this ring any bells?

The President’s psychological make-up includes an inability to accept responsibility for his failures – his disregard of the law now, on a global, tragic scale, for example; and its twin, an inability to make reparation for his gross mistakes. His reliance on binary thinking and his consequently limited view of the world impedes his ability to recognise the humanity of others, which in turn makes it easier to project negative attitudes onto them.

This leads to a self-perpetuating cycle: once they are perceived as having negative attributes, it becomes even harder to feel sympathy for them; and so on. Accompanying this grim syndrome is the President’s tendency to blame others for the damage he has done.

He denies there is any damage for him to take responsibility for. He declared the war ended while the death toll continued mounting, and has since reached ghastly proportions.

And listen to this:

‘Unable to accept responsibility for his actions, he can neither learn from his mistakes nor avoid repeating them. Unable to repair, he can only break and deny’.

Even more alarmingly, since the second Iraq war may be considered by the President to have been a form of revenge for the damage done to his family’s reputation by the CIA operative William Clinton in 1992, George Bush may believe that revenge equates to reparation, even though the avenger’s satisfactions are only temporary. But ‘revenge is mine, saith the Lord’: if the President were a Christian, he would know that policy and behaviour should never, ever be motivated by revenge. ‘Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath; for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord’ [Romans Chapter 12, verse 19].

ALARMING DATA FROM MEDICAL RECORDS
The President’s medical records, reviewed by Dr Frank, also contain alarming signals. In the report on the President’s summer physical in August 2003, a number of spider angiomas were reported to have been removed from his nose. Dr Frank elaborated that, even though there was no indication of liver damage, these are a legitimate source of concern since, while they can appear without any apparent cause, they are most often seen either in pregnancy or in chronic liver damage from excessive alcohol abuse.

A second finding which troubled him is the President’s low pulse rate of 35 to 45, which Dr Frank fears may be associated with a suppressed level of arousal to various visual stimuli.

‘Hypoarousal is typical of antisocial personalities; unable to perceive accurately the world around them, whenever challenged or attacked, such people tend to overreact in violent ways. They [may] ignore facial and behavioral warning signs – and then exhibit rage reactions out of proportion to the particular insult’, whether real or imagined.

When we discussed the President’s low pulse rate with a medically qualified expert, she replied, with considerable emphasis, that such a low pulse rate is ‘extremely abnormal’ and should indeed be a source of grave concern.

A third physical characteristic that Dr Justin Frank takes seriously was described by Mr Bush Jr. himself in his autobiography ‘A Charge to Keep’: ‘Laura stays in her own space; I’ve always invaded other people’s spaces, leaning into them, touching, hugging, getting close… I am in perpetual motion, I provoke people, confront them in a teasing way. I pick at a problem’.

Commenting on this, Dr Frank writes:

‘In a standard physical exam that serves as part of a proper psychodynamic formulation, such behavior would automatically raise the possibility of a neurological connection. Such impulsive discharges of energy can be seen as symptomatic of Tourette’s syndrome; the line between a mild case of Tourette’s and ADHD can be a fine one, or the two may coexist. Most adults with Tourette’s who present at clinics for treatment do so because of temper outbursts’ – the kind of event with which the President’s staffers, like Andrew Card, are believed to be familiar.

The President’s extraordinary lack of curiosity may partly explain some of his ‘economies with the truth’. He said after 9/11 that he ‘never saw any intelligence that indicated there was going to be an attack on America’. However the CIA were engaged in ten simulations of aircraft crashing into very tall buildings on the very day of the atrocities (raising the strong likelihood that the simulations were intended as one of the multiple covers for the resulting ‘Reichstag Fire’ event). At the same time, it is quite possible, according to Dr Frank, that Bush saw plenty of such intelligence, but that it made no impression on him whatsoever. The other possibility, of course, is that he knew what the controlling intelligence services were planning.

Paranoia is another characteristic identified in this President. His strict insistence on absolute loyalty, a demand described by Mr Paul O’Neill among others, suggests that his paranoia runs deep. ‘President Bush’s continued habit of seeing the world as peopled with threats… is so consistent and unmistakable that it can safely be described as paranoid’.

And the disengagement that Bush so frequently exhibits is the typical escape of the paranoid individual. Bush’s behaviour is what psychoanalysts call egosyntonic, which means that his actions – ‘the lies he tells and the hurt he inflicts on others – don’t appear to cause him much anxiety’. Dr Frank also thinks that Mr Bush has spent his life in absolute denial of the many sources of his anxiety, and of his haunting fear of retribution.

HIDING INSIDE THE PRESIDENCY
For Mr Bush, the Presidency is the perfect refuge: as President he [thinks he – Ed.] is in control of everything and [is] surrounded by people who will protect him’ [unless a decision is taken by those who are really in control, to dispense with his services – Ed.]. He is like many CEOs – functioning megalomaniacs who are typically driven to satisfy their grandiose needs through a string of business risks that eventually guarantee failure.

In sum, this man is considered to be extremely dangerous, as Dr Frank’s final words indicate:

‘Our sole treatment option – for his benefit and for ours – is to remove President Bush from office, It’s up to all of us – Congress, the media, and voters – to do so, before it is too late’.

BUT NOW IT’S TOO LATE…
The damage over which this man is liable to preside could range from the degradation of the dollar arising in the context of perceptions of his Administration’s reckless excess spending, to a truly catastrophic series of miscalculations over Iran, Syria and the ‘former’ Soviet Union.

Don’t forget that President Bush has long since misjudged GRU-President Vladimir Putin, who controls him, according to a senior intelligence officer with whom the Editor held an extensive discussion in May 2004. After Mr Putin had left the President’s ranch at Crawford, Texas, on one occasion, Mr Bush suddenly exclaimed: ‘I love him, actually’. Your correspondent formed the view that what Mr Bush Jr. actually meant by this was that he is absolutely terrified of GRU-President Vladimir Putin, but that what came out of his mouth was an inversion of this fear.

What Putin really thinks of Bush is occasionally revealed in off-the-cuff comments – which are always Leninist in character and always contain meanings of relevance to those whom Lenin called ‘the interested’. A Reuters report dated 3rd December quoted Putin, speaking in New Delhi, as having accused the United States of pursuing a dictatorial foreign policy.

‘Even if dictatorship is packaged in beautiful pseudo-democratic phraseology, it will not be able to solve systemic problems. It may even make them worse’, said the GRU operative, with maximum cynicism, as pointedly as possible. As mentioned, only a few weeks earlier, Putin had told George W. Bush in Chile that “his goal is the creation [at home] of a democratic style consistent with Russian history’ [The New York Post, 21st November, page 9]. In both comments, Mr Putin was cunningly making it clear to George Bush that he knew that both powers cynically promoted not democracy but ‘democratism’, but that he is scornful of Mr Bush’s constant references to how he is ‘bringing democracy’ to the Iraqis (that is, to those who have not yet been killed).

At all events, the key point is that George W. Bush has misjudged Putin, so that he may misjudge responses to an intended attack on Iran, Syria, or both, in accordance with the next steps outlined by that that manic (DVD?) geopolitician, Dr Zbigniew Brzezinski in his book ‘The Grand Chessboard: America’s Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives’ [1997, Basic Books, New York], wherein it is recommended that the United States should unilaterally redraw the map of the Middle East and Central Asia to suit its geopolitical and geo-energy interests.

CONCLUSION
If the President is insensitive to the consequences of his actions, this Administration will not only proliferate dangerous military adventures, but will overspend in every component of the budget, especially domestic ‘security’ and preparations for repression at home. One key reason for this endemic free-spending attitude is that since senior officials are aware of the existence of colossal offshore-based financial resources controlled and accessible by the intelligence community, there is an official mindset which pays little attention to the formal budgetary numbers.

The danger of this manifestation of arrogance is that the international financial markets, being in this respect less well informed than key US officials, will continue to adopt a different view.

Obviously, with policy in the unsteady hands of a man diagnosed by one of the United States’ most accomplished psychoanalysts as being paranoid, unpredictable and dangerous as described, it will be quite futile for analysts to expect that appropriate US financial housekeeping will occur during this troubling Presidency. In addition, all the signs are that the Constitution may be abandoned. The outlook for the US dollar, therefore, could not possibly be bleaker, on the basis of the information elaborated in this section alone.

The last time a crisis of these proportions overwhelmed a great nation was in January 1933. ENDS

This was published, as stated above, in January 2005.

*‘Bush on the Couch, Inside the Mind of the President’, by Justin A Frank, MD, Regan Books, HarperCollins Publishers, New York, 2004. ISBN 0-06-073670-4

LEGAL SECTION:
PLEASE READ THIS INFORMATION, AS IT INDICATES THE DEPTH OF THE DEPRAVITY THAT WANTAGATE HAS EXPOSED. REPETITION OF THIS BASIC DATA IS STILL NECESSARY…

• We now repeat, yet again, our familiar summary of the Statutes, securities regulations and fraud information that we have appended to these reports for many months. The reason we append this information is to remind everyone of their clear responsibilities under the US Misprision of Felony legislation, and of course to provide a legal basis for these reports.

LEGAL RECAPITULATION FROM REPORT DATED 30TH AUGUST 2007:
Reiteration of the fraudulent transactions involving Bank of New York Mellon – a bank so arrogant and conspicuously indifferent both to its tarnished reputation and to its grotesque breaches of US law and of N.A.S.D./S.E.C. Regulations, that it now takes first prize in the crowded competition for the title of ‘Most arrogant and corrupt financial institution in America’. At least, this was the case until the perpetration of the ‘Saturday scam’ described above and on 13th November:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• ‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON IS IN BREACH AND OF WHICH THE SIX ‘LEVY BANKS’ MAY LIKEWISE BE VARIOUSLY IN BREACH [CREDIT SUISSE, UBS, DEUTSCHE BANK, BANK OF AMERICA, CITIBANK, THE BANK OF ENGLAND]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is in violation of:
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR SIR LEO WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT THE HIGHEST U.S. LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006, AND HAVE CONTINUED THEIR SERIAL CRIMES EVER SINCE:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war

This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Wanta’s funds.

The Directors and others listed in Part 1 of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and others posted on 11th June may likewise be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious violation of the laws itemised above. This list is reproduced in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, September 2007, on pages 163-168.

Wicked Pedia Update dated 2nd December 2007:

WIKIPEDIA IS PART OF AN NSA DISCREDITING OPERATION
As previously reported, the Editor’s attention was drawn, in the second half of November 2007, to a pack of old lies, diversionary claptrap and disinformation posted on Wikipedia under ‘Leo Wanta’.

Although this posting appeared FOR THE FIRST TIME on 12th November 2007, it consisted almost entirely of ancient lies, including disinformation dredged out of ‘Thieves’ World’, a hatchet job published in 1994 by Simon and Schuster by the late Claire Sterling, a CIA operative.

Mrs Sterling died suddenly after being summoned for her second meeting with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, under Clinton.

ANCIENT DISCREDITED LIES POSTED IN NOVEMBER 2007
The fact that the OLD Wikipedia lies appeared for the first time as late as 12th November 2007, and consisted almost totally of old, discredited lies, omitting the Master Lie that the CIA retailed after the Ambassador had been taken down, namely that he was DEAD, indicated quite clearly to the Editor and his advisers that this latest evil display of regurgitated disinformation represented a deliberate operation by the US intelligence community’s disinformation and lie machine, to begin, all over again, the process of discrediting Ambassador Leo Wanta – so that they can relieve him of his funds by some false pretext or other after a ‘gag order’ has been signed.

The definitive up-to-date information on the Ambassador’s affairs has been published on this website, and in several issues of International Currency Review, Economic Intelligence Review, Soviet Analyst and Arab-Asian Affairs, all published by World Reports Limited, for several years. Copies of these publications are in official, institutional and library hands all over the world. Therefore, any posting about Ambassador Wanta that relies upon ancient lies and fails to take account of the accurate information that we have published, can easily be demonstrated to represent yet another US intelligence community and NSA discrediting operation.

PRELUDE TO ‘SETTING UP’ WANTA ALL OVER AGAIN
We now understand that the Principals have been advised (for the past several weeks) that they will not be allowed to reveal that they have been paid. This loony state of affairs is designed to ‘set them up’ for a future discrediting operation whereby false witness will be deployed against them to the effect that they have stolen the money, or some such pack of lies, which they will be unable to refute because they will be bound by the ‘prerequisite’ gag order that is intended. Its purpose, of course, is to ‘legitimise’ the old and new lies that the US disinformation apparat will be preparing for future use. The likelihood is that the new discrediting operation will be extended to Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., as well. We are prepared for this intended onslaught.

EDITOR’S TRUE REPORT REPEATEDLY REPLACED BY OLD LIES
On 19th November, the Editor posted on Wikipedia the accurate text about Leo Wanta that is now reproduced below. The Editor’s accurate text was then removed by Wikipedia, leaving the ‘old lies’ that had existed previously. When the Editor became aware of this, he reposted the accurate text below, and, given that his own copy had been deleted, he then deleted the pack of lies, leaving his own accurate text up on the Wikipedia site instead, without the lies.

On 2nd December, the Editor was advised by a monitor that the Editor’s accurate text had been removed and that the old discrediting lies had been reposted on the page by Wikipedia. When the Editor checked, he found that the page could no longer be edited because of what the site managers described as ‘vandalism’.

IT’S ‘VANDALISM’ TO POST THE TRUTH, NOT ‘VANDALISM’ TO POST LIES
It was not ‘vandalism’ to delete the truth and to replace the truth by old lies, but it was ‘vandalism’ to delete ‘old lies’ and replace them by the truth.

We are therefore able to conclude from this Wicked Pedia outrage, as follows:

1. Wikipedia, which purports to ‘change the world’, prefers lies to the truth.

2. Wikipedia is therefore, by definition, a source of disinformation and lies, and cannot be trusted as a source of reliable information in any context.

3. The only category of sick society that would have any interest in disseminating lies about Ambassador Wanta, the United States’ greatest living patriot, rather than the truth, is the mentally disturbed US counterintelligence disinformation apparat (a.k.a. the US STUPIDITY COMMUNITY) which, by its actions in deleting the Editor’s ACCURATE information and replacing it with old lies, and by its illegal behaviour in ‘snipping’ our website texts as stated above, thereby reveals the desperation of its concerns, which all have to do with covering up official criminality.

4. It is now far too late for the US stupidity community to repair the damage that it has done since June 2006, when the Ambassador’s funds were first hijacked by the criminal financial operative Henry M. Paulson, US Treasury Secretary. So it is laying the groundwork for a renewed discrediting operation against Ambassador Wanta and his colleagues.

• We and others will see to it that this intention is defeated, and that such nefarious scheming is exposed for the amoral and disgusting Luciferian behaviour that it represents.

The ACCURATE text that the Editor posted on the Wikipedia site, follows. (The Editor, after all, PAID FOR AMBASSADOR WANTA’S EXIT FROM PROBATION, FOR GOODNESS SAKE, SO HE CAN HARDLY BE A SOURCE OF DISINFORMATION, CAN HE?). This information will be very widely distributed by other means, in order to provide all concerned with the necessary ‘heads-up’ as to what these US Dark Forces have in mind. They are out of their minds and in Satan’s mind:

The disinformation about Leo Wanta (Lee Wanta) below was first posted on 12th November 2007. It contains ancient CIA disinformation and long since exposed lies going back to the early 1990s, and obfuscates the truth. The report appended immediately below was added on 19th November 2007, to correct the disinformation contained in the original stub.

It was subsequently removed and is hereby replaced. This sequence of events, which suggests that egregious lies are preferred to the truth, has been recorded on www.worldreports.org, which contains all the updated and breaking Wanta material, that was ignored and traduced in the stub at the foot of this report.

THE ACCURATE TEXT THAT WIKIPEDIA REPEATEDLY DELETED
This is the correct information that we posted on 19th November 2007:

The ‘information’ posted below represents a deliberately malevolent, false disinformation picture which has no bearing on reality. It is a travesty of the truth of the matter and cites Christopher Story as the author of some of the disinformation, which is libellous and implies that Story, the veteran
Editor of International Currency Review of nearly 40 years’ standing, is engaged in the egregious dissemination of lies, which is not the case.

This is such an egregiously malevolent stub of disinformation that readers should prudently dismiss it altogether; they should start afresh by accessing Christopher Story‘s website, which is: www.worldreports.org., reading from the Archive.

www.worldreports.org is the authoritative source for all updated information on Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta. The source ‘Thieves’ World’ was a CIA disinformation work prepared by the late CIA disinformation operative Claire Sterling, published in 1994.

This stub regurgitates ancient lies perpetrated by the CIA, which lied for many years that Lee (Leo being his intelligence community name) Wanta was dead. The CIA proclaimed that he was dead so that corrupt cadres could ransack his funds (see below).

He ‘ceased to be dead’ with effect from 21st July 2005 after Christopher Story, a British private citizen, had paid $35,000 from his scarce private funds pro bono publico by way of ‘restitution’ to an American lawyer for onward payment to the Wisconsin State Department of Corrections, to procure Mr Wanta’s release from his illegal probation.

Despite his Ambassadorial status, Wanta had been illegally ‘taken down’ in Switzerland on 7th July 1993 without a warrant on a trumped-up Wisconsin State charge of having failed to pay $14,129 in falsely assessed Wisconsin State fabricated tax that he never owed because he had been resident in Vienna on US Presidential intelligence work since June 1988.

This data is all in the public domain, has been published for several years in International Currency Review, the Journal of the World Financial Community, and can be read on Mr Story’s website.

International Currency Review is a banking and financial journal with a worldwide circulation: ISSN 0020-6490. It is published by World Reports Limited, London.

Notwithstanding that this fabricated tax demand (orchestrated by US criminal intelligence) had been paid twice under protest by Lee Emil Wanta from abroad (in May and June 1992), the funds were improperly allocated by the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue and were never credited to the false account maintained by them for the Ambassador. (Christopher Story holds documentary
proof of both payments). They were paid a third time by Christopher Story in June 2005, which action duly procured Mr Wanta’s release from illegal probation effective 14th November 2005.

As a consequence of Wanta thus ceasing to be dead, the CIA’s lie that he was dead collapsed in chaos, and all the subsidiary old false witness lies that the CIA had perpetrated, including those assembled for disinformation purposes in the stub below (which, in line with the standard false witness used throughout by detractors, attempts to portray Christopher Story as a source of disinformation) were discredited as well.

Why was Wanta taken down? So that the criminal intelligence cadres running the US Government could ransack the $27.5 trillion of funds assembled by Leo Wanta on President Reagan’s orders, in the course of his Financial Warfare operations against the USSR.

Under Reagan’s Executive Order 12333 of 1981, US intelligence officers were permitted to establish corporations which could thereafter contract with the CIA/DIA/DEA/NSA et al for the purpose of fulfilling allotted intelligence tasks allocated to them.

The financial proceeds of operations conducted by such corporations were consequently the property of the corporations and thus of their shareholders, a legal fact of life which has never been, and cannot be, disputed. This was not a good idea because almost all US intelligence
operatives are liars and do not function on the basis of the Rule of Law at all, if they can help it.

Lee Wanta is the well-known patriotic exception to this rule: he operates solely in accordance with US law, in contrast to the behaviour of other US operatives, which is why the kakocracy* needed to remove him from the scene, as duly occurred July 1993.

Once Wanta had been illegally arrested (contrary to international law, as a diplomat) and then thrown into a stinking Swiss jail on 7th July 1993, the criminal cadres inside the US official structures immediately ransacked Mr Wanta’s bank accounts according to plan.

The history of this matter is, and has been, elaborated in great depth on Christopher Story‘s website www.worldreports.org. and has been extensively published, as mentioned, in International Currency Review and other World Reports Limited intelligence publications.

Students are advised perhaps to begin with the ‘Wisconsingate’ report dated 6th August 2007, which forensically dissects, with detailed documentary back-up, the Wisconsin Department of Revenue’s tax fabrication operation against Wanta, stretching back for over 20 years, that has been exposed by Christopher Story in minute detail, and which formed the fabricated basis for Wanta’s illegal takedown in 1993, despite the fact that Wisconsin has no jurisdiction beyond its borders.

The overall Wantagate crisis, which is the sole and continuing underlying cause of the prevailing global financial and economic day of reckoning that the world is now facing, has been triggered by the fact that the George W. Bush Jr. White House, aided and abetted by other senior office-holders, hijacked the compromise financial settlement of $4.5 trillion that the White House itself agreed (in a classified accord that was finalised in May 2006) should be paid over to Ambassador Wanta, so that the stolen and diverted remaining $23 trillion of his funds (and the many hundreds of trillions of dollars hypothecated upon them) could be released from a de facto lien arising from the collapse of the CIA’s lie that Wanta was dead.

For clearly, since he had ceased to be dead, 100% of these funds (plus the hundreds of trillions of fiat ‘funny’ money generated by illegal leveraged operations from that base) belonged to Lee Wanta and to no-one else: a situation that the banks ‘could not handle’.

The entire narrative of what has become the worst financial corruption crisis in world history (which this stub consisting of disinformation attempts to obfuscate) is set out in great detail on Christopher Story‘s website www.worldreports.org., to which all readers are directed in order for the accurate state of affairs to be understood. As indicated, this stub below is a travesty and a disgrace, as it regurgitates long since discredited CIA lies, presents a diversionary, distorted and misleading picture, and because it malevolently incorporates Christopher Story as a source for some of this disinformation.

It is a disgusting instance of ignorant and malevolent US counterintelligence disinformation and deceit at its very worst.

All the statements in the above commentary may be verified by reference to www.worldreports.org and International Currency Review. Another publication covering this matter in detail is Economic Intelligence Review, also published by World Reports Limited, London. Wanta students should access the Archive on the www.worldreports.org Home Page.

A book devoted to Ambassador Wanta and the Wantagate crisis is in preparation

The Wanta disinformation referred to above has been deleted from this page. ENDS.

DIPLOMATIC STATUS OF THE PRINCIPALS
The Ambassador and his colleagues now have special diplomatic status (conferred upon them by HM The Queen in 2007), which means that the Ambassador is now an Ambassador several times over. This factor greatly complicates the intended discrediting offensive that the mad US stupidity community’s Dark Forces contemplate, their sole objective being of course to cover up their own criminality, in line with pending ‘thought crime’ legislation which has the same Nazi-style objective.

*Note: ‘Kakocracy’: Governance by a clique representing the worst elements of society, in their interests and to the exclusion of all other interests, from the Greek, kakos, meaning foul, or filthy.

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier Wantagate reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.

PAULSON DIVERSION MASKED THEFT OF $44+ TRILLION

TREASURY SHOOTINGS AND DC ‘CIVIL WAR’ CONFIRMED

Wednesday 9 January 2008 03:54

• SEE UPDATE, 10TH JANUARY IMMEDIATELY BELOW

• NOTE THAT THE ‘PAULSON FORENSICS’ FILE IS GROWING, AT THE FOOT OF THIS REPORT

THE STATE DEPARTMENT CONFIRMED THAT PAULSON DIED: BUSH CONTRADICTED THEM

CITIBANK ORDERED TO SETTLE TODAY, OR ITS ASSETS WILL BE SEIZED AND FROZEN

WASHINGTON BLOODBATH WILL CONTINUE IF SETTLEMENTS KEEP BEING FRUSTRATED

SENSITIVE INTELLIGENCE CENSORED FROM THIS REPORT, PENDING SETTLEMENT TODAY

PURPOSE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: TO INFLICT HILLARY ON THE WORLD FOR THE COVER-UP

• LIKELY SCENARIO: ISRAEL: BOMB IRAN WITH US, AND WE’LL HAND YOUR MONEY BACK

• MORE INDICATIONS OF PAULSON IDENTITY FRAUD BEING RECEIVED FROM ALL OVER…

• SEE 26TH DECEMBER REPORT FOR FINANCIAL FRAUDS BEHIND THE ‘SUBPRIME’ CRISIS

• SEE 5TH JANUARY REPORT FOR DATA AND IDENTITY THEFT SCAMMING CRISIS

• PLEASE READ THE VERY IMPORTANT INTRODUCTION APPENDED TO THIS REPORT

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for ‘Wantagate’ reports since April 2006. [Note: A new panel giving details of our latest publications as they are made available, has been added].

• Please Make a Donation to help finance Christopher Story‘s ongoing financial global corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial corruption and global financial crisis in history. This website has been calling the shots, because of the hijacking of Wanta’s Settlement.

• UPDATE, 10TH JANUARY:

It has been alleged that the report below suggests that our report dated 2nd January to the effect that Paulson died, which preceded all other published reports to that effect, was hereby amended.
Careful attention should be paid to what we stated below. Specifically, we detailed the sources for all the information that we had received on this subject, as a direct result of which exposure, the orchestrated campaign of denigration that was focused on us by the rats, suddenly ceased. That happened because, since we had exposed their ‘Black Op’, they had no choice. It should also be understood that a ‘Black Op’ can be superimposed upon another ‘Black Op’, so that whether the
rat in question is dead or not makes no difference to the functioning of the ‘Black Operation’.

The forensic evidence that is being accumulated makes it quite clear that the controlled video and other recorded evidence of what happened has been DOCTORED, BIG TIME: and that should make it self-evident that THE FACTS OF THE MATTER ARE BEING DOCTORED, AS WELL.

• FACT: The US Treasury did NOT issue a formal denial of the verified confirmation by the State Department on 2nd January that Paulson had died. One would have thought that such a denial would have been appropriate, given the sensitivity of this matter for the financial markets alone.

• FACT: The White House did NOT issue a formal denial of the verified confirmation by the State Department on 2nd January that Paulson had died. President Bush mumbled ‘that’s a lie’, but if that was so, WHY WAS THIS PRESIDENTIAL STATEMENT NOT FOLLOWED UP BY A FORMAL DENIAL?

In the analysis below, we explain that one reason that these denials were not issued was that the shootings indeed took place, so that denying the death of Paulson would have drawn attention to the shootings and would have forced the pathetic controlled ‘mainstream’ to start catching up with the despised ‘alternative media’ which is telling the truth while the ‘mainstream’ languishes under the constraints imposed by Operation Mockingbird, and fails in its duty as the Fourth Estate to tell the people the truth and nothing but the truth.

We would also draw attention again to the information about Mr Kimmitt cited below, and would reiterate that so far as we aware (we stand to be corrected here) there has been no mention of Kimmitt at all since these horrible events.

Finally, for the time being, you will note that the information censored from the report has not yet been posted. We state below that if the Settlement was not completed yesterday, we would post the sensitive intelligence which was censored from this report. The Wanta Settlement was not paid yesterday, as we anticipated. The Editor therefore, out of courtesy, asked whether it would not now be appropriate to post the censored information. The Editor’s decision re all editorial issues arising for these reports and our printed intelligence publications, is final. However for reasons that have been explained to him this morning, the Editor has agreed to withhold this information for a little longer, as it ties in with new raw intelligence that is being digested ‘as we speak’.

It has nevertheless been agreed that, on the assumption that the Settlement will again be aborted by the rats today, we will build the censored information into the next report. To close this point for the time being, the request from US intel to Mr Cottrell for the ‘censored’ information to be lifted from yesterday’s report (below) was accompanied by a statement along the lines of ‘you will be very happy later today’. In other words the US intel sources making the request represented, falsely as it unsurprisingly turns out, that they were in a position to indicate that the Settlement would indeed be effected yesterday, WHICH DID NOT HAPPEN. Therefore, naturally, we are in no way bound by our undertaking yesterday. A gentleman’s word is his bond, but not if he is double-crossed.

INTRODUCTION: THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT
The Editor prepared the report below in order to expose the background to the entire Paulson episode and to place it in the context of what was really going on behind the scenes. In a case moving as rapidly as this one, a report prepared yesterday is overtaken by events today, and vice versa. Luckily, the Editor was too tired at 5.00am British time to complete the posting of this report, because it became clear on the morning of 9th January that the absolute end of the line had been reached. Because of this understanding, we were in a much better position to deconstruct what that Paulson matter was all about. We summarise the position here in the context of today’s news.

Paulson, Kimmitt and one further high US Treasury official WERE SHOT: that is CONFIRMED (see below). Then, on the back of these horrible facts, Cheney’s desperate disinformation apparat built a ‘Black Ops’ ‘sting’, to the effect that Paulson was dead. (We don’t really know, despite ‘postmortem appearances’, whether he is or not: but this is now a diversion: see what follows). Why, given that the shootings took place, was it ‘necessary’ to build a ‘sting’ (a possible ‘lie’ that Paulson was dead) on the back of that fact? The answer to this has now become clear. It is this:

• Post-settlement, THERE IS TO BE ENDLESS SILENCE. The few despised ‘alternative media’ outlets that have tried to expose this historically unprecedented financial criminality are to be left out to dry. Now, in the cases of several outlets based in the United States, the relevant ‘forces’ can do any number of things: cease payments, withdraw handlers, harrassment, threats, whatever. But what can they do to silence us (within reason, and given our background and connections)? The answer is: NOT A LOT. So, as usual, ‘they’ resort to the only game ‘they’ know: DIRTY TRICKS.

• Since ‘they’ want total silence to reign for ever, and a veil to be drawn across this evil, stinking theatre of criminality, the ideal solution for them would be to try to discredit the only sources that have led this hideous information into the public domain. So they tried it on, by elaborating on the shootings and possibly lying that Paulson had died. (We still don’t know what happened to Kimmitt, by the way: see hard evidence of something very nasty, below).

As you will see from the report below, this ‘sting’ operation has not succeeded. Furthermore, post-settlement, the question remains: what are they going to do about Mr Christopher Story? Here is a suggestion: RELY ON HIS GOODWILL. No, we won’t be silenced. But, as you will also see below, we DO try to be helpful whenever we can. We will govern our responses in accordance with the future behaviour of the ‘forces’ who would like to shut us down without a cause. All we have ever done is, pro bono publico, to publish the truth about hidden criminality at the intergovernmental level that stinks in the nostrils of every normal human being who is not sitting on his or her brains.

NOW, please take note of THIS. In the text below, you will see that a section, which was to contain extremely sensitive intelligence, HAS BEEN CENSORED.

This has happened because the Editor and Mr Cottrell were discussing this article yesterday and incorporated certain sensitive information which needs to be delivered into the public domain, and which will have devastatingly severe consequences behind the scenes were it to be publicised.

• The eavesdroppers overheard what we had planned, and telephoned Mr Cottrell this morning to ask him to prevail upon the Editor for the intelligence to be withheld. The Editor has COMPLIED, but ONLY on the clear, strict understanding that the Wanta Settlement, which we believe may well be on the verge of implementation, is indeed effected TODAY, 9TH JANUARY 2008.

THEREFORE, should it transpire later today that we have been deceived, the intelligence that has been censored from this report will be reinserted without further ado, since we will not be bound by any undertaking if other parties have reneged on theirs, or double-crossed payees yet again.

PURPOSE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: TO INFLICT HILLARY ON THE WORLD FOR THE COVER-UP
The substantial opinion poll lead of the Obama campaign immediately prior to the New Hampshire primary election, which vanished to yield a tiny majority for Mrs Rodomski Clinton yesterday, is of course connected to the crisis that we are having to report on this website. Mrs Hillary Clinton is the criminalists’ ‘macro plan’. To cover up their past giga-thefts, they NEED this Evil Jezebel in the White House. When it appeared that Obama was heading for a second primary win, which would have given him near-impregnability, ‘they’ resorted to their usual DIRTY TRICKERY: fiddling with electronic voting machines. This subject is covered in the Editor’s book ‘The New Underworld Order‘, which is dedicated to the late Andrew (‘Andy’) Stephenson, who exposed the electronic voting machine fraudulence and was murdered by the Dark Forces for his pains in 2005.

Lo and behold, New Hampshire uses the notorious Diebold electronic voting machines, which seem to exist not to count votes BUT TO RIG ELECTION OUTCOMES. What a coincidence that there is a Bush Crime Family connection to Diebold. The American Presidential electoral system taught to young Americans at school is a myth. The United States struts around the world telling everybody all about democracy and judging whether a foreign election is fair or not, while back home it rigs its own elections. This Durkheimian ‘election norm’ is being exposed along with the financial frauds exposed by this website. The Dark Forces intend to vote-rig their way to a Hillary Presidency.

And while on the subject of deception, as usual, it is 10.15pm here, UK time, on 9th January 2008. As far as the Editor is aware the settlements have NOT been implemented.

This means that, having been deceived yet again, we will be left with no choice but to post the censored information referenced in this report. We removed the information on the basis that there was to be no further duplicity. But as Durkheim taught, duplicity in ‘anomie’ is their norm.

LIKELY SCENARIO: ISRAEL: BOMB IRAN WITH US, AND WE’LL HAND YOUR MONEY BACK
10th January, early morning UK time: We are receiving indications, as yet unconfirmed, that a total sum aggregating $43 trillion was stolen and transferred to Israel: if that is not the case, this was the intention; or else the funds are controlled by Israeli interests. Should this turn out to be accurate, then the geopolitical scenario is almost certainly as follows. Israel is blackmailing the United States, with the assistance of traitors inside Citibank and elsewhere in the US banking system, and in the White House and the Treasury, to force the issue of bombing Iran, which the whole world believes would be an act of the most extreme folly imaginable. In other words, Israel may be saying to the United States: Bomb Iran, and then we’ll return the money. Not before. Let’s hope this assessment is dead wrong. But if it isn’t, you can imagine the multiple adverse consequences that may ensue.

DECONSTRUCTING THE PAULSON DIVERSION
On January 8th 2008 a figure appearing to be Henry M. Paulson Jr., Secretary of the US Treasury, appeared on CNBC talking about the economy and related matters.

The voice appeared to correspond closely to Paulson’s known voice. Whether this individual was Paulson or not is not confirmed, especially in the light of forensic examination of video footage of the event, and of earlier ‘postmortem appearances’ not dealt with here; but the TV show purported to be broadcast live. Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., the Executive Vice President and Treasurer of Ambassador Wanta’s AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc, therefore telephoned the Editor to ask him whether he would publicise the sources of the information that Paulson was shot and gravely wounded on 28th or 29th December, and that he died shortly thereafter.

This is done below.

Peculiar to the United States, a mini-industry of ‘doubles’ exists who hire themselves out to stand in for prominent people who have either been killed or who, for various pressing reasons, need to be ‘absent’ when they are supposed to be ‘performing’. In an email received by the Editor from an informed US source at 4:41pm UK time on 4th January 2008, on the subject of doubles, the source wrote: ‘It would be interesting to see if there is more than one Paulson running around. Lookalikes are used a great deal for people in sensitive situations, because they get murdered a lot, so they keep a spare, or use the spare in sensitive situations’.

Forensic deconstruction of earlier still photographs, video and alleged ‘appearances’ raised serious doubts about the reliability of some of the images, according to several experts who have shared their analyses with us. However let us assume for that Paulson himself was interviewed on CNBC at around 8.00am on 8th January. This presentation assumes, subject to issues raised in the sources cited below, that the ‘real’ Paulson had suddenly materialised for public consumption.

Furthermore, we had a contact who deliberately attended the ‘Paulson’ event at the Westin Hotel in New York City on 7th January, having paid $20 entry fee. Although he sat at the back of the room, he thought that the person speaking was indeed Henry M. Paulson.

WHY DID THE U.S. TREASURY NOT DEMAND A RETRACTION?
If this was indeed the case, why did the US Treasury not demand from the Editor of this service an immediate retraction of our report that Paulson had been shot, and had subsequently died? One would have thought that Paulson’s office would have seen to it that the report was denied. Why did Paulson’s office not issue a denial of the report?

At no time has the report been officially denied. How very odd!

Thus it would seem that the US Treasury was in no way ‘phased’ by the fact that Paulson had been reported to have been shot and had died. WHY ON EARTH WAS THAT?

FACT: Treasury Compliance specifically confirmed that the following official was shot by Special Forces operatives on 28/29th December 2007:

• Henry M. Paulson, US Treasury Secretary.

At 01:08 UK time on 3rd January 2008, a source who is special to this service emailed the Editor as follows: ‘I was told that an Undersecretary of Treasury was also eliminated’ [sic]. We have separate confirmation of this, reviewed below. This email is of course held on file.

SHOOTING OF PAULSON CONFIRMED BY TREASURY COMPLIANCE
At 2.30pm UK time on 8th January 2008, Michael C. Cottrell M.S., speaking on an open transatlantic line that was immediately tapped into by inquisitive intelligence eavesdroppers and so that these eavesdroppers would hear what he had to say, specifically and emphatically reiterated that US Treasury Compliance had definitively confirmed the shootings (which were expert ‘pass-through’ shootings – see below – at least, in the case of Paulson, assuming he ‘is alive’: we have had no reports at this date of Kimmitt having been seen since the shootings). Mr Cottrell repeated this information with great emphasis for the benefit of the eavesdroppers. Mr Cottrell then added that ‘what we could not confirm was that Paulson had died later’.

However the Editor had been separately informed by a source citing the US State Department that he had died (see below). If the ‘fact’ that Paulson had died was a lie, it was perpetrated deliberately by the US disinformation apparat, in order to ‘sting’ the Editor and to try to compromise our exposures. This desperate ruse has not worked.

On the contrary, it has compounded the perpetrators’ terminal problems, as you will see if you read what we have to say now.

Why, too, did the Paulson family not protest at the Editor’s report? Was Merritt Paulson, Mr Paulson’s son, resident at Lake Oswego, Oregon, not disturbed by this report? Apparently not.

Was the report not officially denied by the Treasury, let alone the Paulson family, because the US Government despises what its cynical officials call ‘the alternative media’ to such an extent that it refuses to recognise its existence?

Put another way: since the report appeared in the so-called ‘alternative media’, was it not worth denying simply because, by definition, it could not be true?

If so, what is the problem? Why all the concern? Since the report appeared in the ‘alternative media’, it supposedly cannot be true – the reverse of the lie that if a report has not been published in the so-called ‘mainstream’ (a.k.a., ‘sidestream’, or ‘latestream’) media, it cannot be true either. Welcome to Operation Mockingbird.

‘OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD’ BLOCKS COVERAGE IN THE ‘MAINSTREAM’
Those correspondents who have flooded the Editor with emails complaining that the report cannot be true because it hasn’t appeared in the ‘mainstream’ need to look up Operation Mockingbird – the US criminal counterintelligence community’s long-established media control programme, which has been running for decades. Just type Operation Mockingbird into your browser or Google and read all about it. This programme has for decades successfully denied the American people the truth about issues that the criminal intelligence community, which controls the US Government, wishes to disguise or to obfuscate.

Therefore, rather than shoot the true messenger with the usual knee-jerk response that ‘the report hasn’t been confirmed in the mainstream, so it cannot be true’, serious students of the Dark Forces engaged in destroying America should equip themselves with this background, if only to spare the Editor and others who are trying to prevent the collapse at the hands of these criminals, from being inundated by emailers who haven’t done their homework.

Of course, the preceding observations do not address the ‘post-mortem appearances’ of Paulson, which is a separate issue, dealt with below.

REPORT COULD NOT BE DENIED BECAUSE THE SHOOTINGS TOOK PLACE
As it turns out, THE TREASURY COULD NOT DENY OUR REPORT OF THE SHOOTINGS, EVEN IF IT HAD BEEN SO INCLINED, BECAUSE IT WAS TRUE (as we always knew to be the case).

What then happened was that the (supposedly) FALSE report that Paulson had died, was used in a deliberate Cheney-directed ‘Black operation’ or ‘sting’ ordered by Bush 41 through Bush 43 and Cheney, to discredit the Editor of this service and the Principals, with the following motives:

• To stall our ongoing successful exposures of the financial criminality, money-laundering, drug-trafficking and drug distribution operations of the criminal cadres, which have triggered the ensuing investigations (backed by law enforcement, extensive ongoing investigations, Grand Jury hearings, DOD Internal Affairs and other relevant parties) of the continuing thefts, thereby enabling the criminalists to continue ‘business as usual’ behind the smokescreen of Paulson’s death.

• To provide cover for the stealing of $44 trillion plus that Mr Cottrell has confirmed to the Editor took place behind the hysteria of the Paulson death.

REASON THE GOVERNMENT WAS HAPPY WITH THE PAULSON DIVERSION
Obviously, since the US Treasury did not DENY the shootings (because it couldn’t, as they DID TAKE PLACE, as elaborated further below), the Treasury WAS CONTENT FOR THE PAULSON FRENZY TO FEED ON ITSELF, for some reason.

What was that reason?

It suited the criminal elements in the US Government for the reports to remain ‘out there’, diverting everyone’s attention from what was actually going on behind the scenes, namely FURTHER GROSS THEFT AND LARCENY perpetrated under the control of Bush 41, Bush 43, and Cheney – who, you will recall, is the master disinformation and US Psy-Ops operative who ‘formerly’ controlled the MK-Ultra and related programmes based upon Himmlerian ‘Black Operations’ techniques imported lock stock and barrel by what soon became the (criminal) Central Intelligence Agency from ‘former’ Nazi Germany (the qualification ‘former’ being superfluous, given what is being exposed).

LANGLEY HQ BEARS THE NAME OF THE WORLD’S WORST CRIMINAL
Several years ago now, Langley, the headquarters of the Nazi-penetrated criminal enterprise that is devastating the whole world called the Central Intelligence Agency, was renamed the George Bush Center for Intelligence. By this means, George Bush Sr., the world’s biggest crook, formalised the absolute control over the CIA that he had wielded de facto since becoming President Reagan’s Vice President in 1981.

Think about it this way. Suppose there is such a phenomenon as an intelligence ‘white hat’, and suppose that the ‘white hats’ were to have reached the collective conclusion that George Bush Sr. is indeed the most dangerous and ruthless criminal operative alive. What are they now going to do about it, given that their HQ is named after the world’s biggest crook himself?

They are stuck – because, in seeking to distance the CIA from this monster Godfather, they will have to acknowledge before world public opinion that the CIA is itself the hideous criminal enterprise that we all know it to be.

So what do they do? They decide that they cannot distance the CIA, and themselves, from George Bush Sr. – the practical consequence of which is that George Bush Sr. believes that he can do anything he likes, with 100% assumed certainty of perpetual impunity.

The CIA is the collective lackey, whether or not it has ever had second thoughts, of George Herbert Walker Bush Sr., DVD.

CIA ‘FURIOUS THAT IT HAS BEEN EXPOSED’
At the same time, we were informed on 3rd January that the CIA is furious because it has been exposed, and doesn’t know what to do. This criminal enterprise never imagined that there would ever come a time when it would have to deal with this problem. But the ongoing exposure of the CIA consequent upon the criminal cadres’ grotesque mishandling of Wantagate can only lead to calls for this dangerous, reprobate and recalcitrant criminal enterprise, the headquarters of which is named after the Godfather of criminal godfathers, to be cut down to size or closed down.

Permanent closure is actually the only way that the poison seeping out from Langley can ever be contained, and the world spared a truly hellish future.

Why should the CIA be furious that it has been exposed, when the exposure of its criminality has been achieved by this Wantagate website, without any assistance at all from the controlled and complacent ‘sidestream’ media?

Surely, the ‘alternative’ media – to use the pejorative phrase employed by a US Treasury official whose rudeness to one of our correspondents when he telephoned to establish Paulson’s status, was horrendous (1) – can have no relevance in such matters. It doesn’t count.

What counts is supposed to be what we read in the (controlled) ‘mainstream’. The ‘alternative media’, by definition, cannot possibly ever know anything. Why pay attention to it, then, Langley?

THE BASIC PAULSON FACTS
So, to summarise on Paulson (further source details below):

1. Paulson was shot in the timeframe specified. This was definitively confirmed by Treasury Compliance and was reconfirmed to the Editor of this service on 8th January 2008 by Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., with all his extensive authority.

2. The shooting was undertaken by expert Special Forces marksmen who are quite capable of ‘pass-through’ shots in accordance with their instructions. Assuming that the intention was not to kill, its purpose was to warn these operatives that their monstrous treason against the United States and the American people will no longer be tolerated.

3. The death of Paulson was a lie (on the assumption, for the purposes of this presentation, that he is not dead) which was then retailed on Bush 41’s orders through a compliant grapevine and via the State Department in order to discredit the Editor of this service and to trash our reporting. This ‘sting’ operation has been a failure.

4. In other words a ‘BLACK OPERATION’. a.k.a. ‘a sting’, was piggybacked onto the actual shootings that indeed took place. This of course has all the hallmarks of Cheney, a ruthless and singularly evil (MK-Ultra) operative who has known links with several crime families in Chicago, and with at least one Judge in Cook County, Illinois.

$44+ TRILLION STOLEN WHILE THE PAULSON FRENZY CONTINUED
Now, before reverting to the Paulson background and to our sources apart from Treasury Compliance for the shootings report, what has been going on while the distraction of the Paulson ‘death’ was consuming the minds of half the planet?

Having completed the relevant investigations, Mr Cottrell informed the Editor in the course of the telephone call timed at 2.30pm on 8th January that the smokescreen of the Paulson ‘death’ report built on top of the actual shootings, was manipulated by Cheney and his disinformation apparat for OBFUSCATION PURPOSES and that:

• $44+ trillion was stolen and moved to Europe behind this smokescreen (OR: an attempt to do this was perpetrated, which was partially successful but which has since been frustrated). The primary recipient institution involved was BNP (Banque Nationale de Paris, Paribas). This means that the eight Paribas bankers who were arrested, as we reported earlier, had corrupt accomplices who remained in place, and whose services were activated in connection with the illegal transfer of stolen funds being reported here.

• The stolen funds represented $34 trillion held on C.H.I.P.S. belonging to Chinese parties (see earlier Wantagate reports) plus other monies including Ambassador Wanta’s $4.5 trillion, a scandal that has triggered G-8 and Chinese retaliation against Citibank, the accounts and assets of which are reported (as of late on 8th January) to have been or to be at risk of being frozen, against the background of Citibank being ‘ORDERED’ to pay Wanta et al IMMEDIATELY. See below.

• Funds were being disbursed into bank accounts to pay off domestic and foreign politicians and to set up more criminal financial and other operations. In other words, corrupt representatives of the payee ‘countries’ are helping themselves

• Channels in communication with the Principals and this service were arguably lied to concerning all dimensions of these matters, including the usual Greenspan-Bush ‘preparing to settle’ routine whereby prospective country and ‘Tier 1-6’ recipients, headed by Ambassador Wanta, were to be paid in accordance with a constantly amended ‘manana, manana’ timeframe: the standard Bush 41 technique that has been deployed for years.

• These manoeuvrings followed the usual, unchanging model of financial deception developed by Dr Alan Greenspan and Godfather Bush Sr., which we have called the ‘never-pay’ syndrome. The way this works is simple in theory. The model requires every outstanding payment (of monies and funds leveraged from them, owed to financial scam victims and past investors, and of funds owed to ‘countries’ and of course all the funds owned by Ambassador Lee Wanta as sole principal) to be linked and ‘dependent’ upon other transactions and remittances. That way, sabotage perpetrated by corrupt bankers and operatives at any level of the transactions gridlock, destabilises the entire payments edifice, so that payments are repeatedly aborted. This procedure is repeated indefinitely.

It may be added that further ‘active investigations’ have been triggered by these and related events, about which the Editor has not been informed.

CITIBANK ON VERGE OF BEING SHUT DOWN FOLLOWING THE LATEST GIGA-THEFTS
Citibank in Hong Kong is virtually owned by the Chinese, who hold approximately 90% of its so-called ‘assets’ (debt-backed assets). Therefore the Chinese authorities would have no problem actually causing the demise of Citibank, and were more than entitled to take whatever action they might deem appropriate in the light of the outrageous and despicable last-minute $44+ trillion (in the aggregate) theft that was perpetrated (or attempted) under cover of the ‘redirection’ operation surrounding the Paulson shooting and ‘death’ farrago.

• A ten-day deadline for the Wanta and related settlements imposed by the G-8 powers expired last Monday and failing settlement, Citibank may cease to exist and US banks, being non-compliant with Basel II, will be cut out of the world banking system overnight.

That would quickly trigger a 50+% drop in the US standard of living. However we believe that the massive pressure that has been brought to bear (mainly by this service, in respect of the public domain) may have ‘done the trick’ and that the Lee Wanta and ‘linked’ settlements will have been implemented just in the nick of time. This assessment is supported by the fact that we have now removed certain devastating intelligence from the present report, which we had talked over with Mr Cottrell. We have done this because just prior to this report being posted, Mr Cottrell received a phone call asking him to request that the Editor remove the relevant section ‘because this matter is being dealt with this morning’. This was accompanied by a comment to the effect that ‘you should be very happy later today’. Since the parties conveying this request are ‘part of the solution, not part of the problem’, we have naturally complied: with the proviso that in the event of any further interference with the settlements TODAY, the devastating information that we have removed will be reinserted on the basis that we don’t need to comply with anything if we have been deceived.

CENSORED INTELLIGENCE: THE REFERENCED INFORMATION WAS REMOVED FROM HERE
As indicated in the preceding section, the sensitive intelligence that was to have been posted in THIS SPACE, has been removed at the request of people ‘who are part of the solution, not part of the problem’. THIS HAS BEEN DONE ON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT IF THIS EDITOR DOES NOT GATHER THAT THE SETTLEMENT HAS BEEN EFFECTED TODAY, 9TH JANUARY 2008, THE SENSITIVE INTELLIGENCE WHICH ‘THEY’ WANTED REMOVED, WILL BE REINSERTED WITHOUT FURTHER ADO. We cannot be ‘told what to do’, but were are ‘trying to be helpful’.

PHYSICAL STATUS OF PAULSON IS NOT A KEY TO UNDERSTANDING
Here, it needs perhaps to be added that it is neither here nor there, from the perspective of the Settlements, whether Paulson is alive or dead now, is it? If he is alive, the ‘sting’ objective of the criminal ‘Black Ops’ apparat was ‘achieved’ (so they may have briefly imagined: but no longer, we are told). If he is dead, Story was right, but he ‘rose from the dead’ in the format of a supposedly hired ‘double’ (the sophistication of which improved somewhat between 4th and 8th January, it seems), achieving the same fleeting objective in the perception of those who have little knowledge of US criminal counterintelligence Psy-Ops and the willing cooperation of the US ‘mainstream’ media under the terms of Operation Mockingbird.

In other words, the Paulson matter is indeed, viewed in the necessary broader perspective of the ongoing financial stealing and corruption that has been taking place while the Paulson ‘feeding frenzy’ has been going on, DIVERSIONARY.

THE STEPS OF ANY ‘BLACK OPERATIONS’ MODEL
The essence of the attempted ‘Black Ops’ ‘sting’ against the Editor of this service, if that was what happened, was applied in accordance with the following model, Mr Cottrell informed the Editor at 5.00pm on 8th January:

• Step One: Redirect attention decisively away from what’s going on/is intended.

• Step Two: OBFUSCATION: Create a massive diversion so that everyone rushes to look at an irrelevance. And in this context, Michael C. Cottrell stresses to the Editor that Paulson IS INDEED AN IRRELEVANCE. He was shot at and is being used to carry out the obfuscation programme directed on behalf of Bush Sr. by Cheney, while the criminal cadres (in the CIA and the relevant banks) perpetrated:

• Step Three: Colossal theft of the funds. As stated above, $44.0+ trillion was stolen behind the smokescreen provided by this contrived Paulson obfuscation operation. At 4.50pm on 8th January, we were reliably advised that a very large sum of money, thought to have been of the order of $19 trillion, had been recovered, from the funds that were stolen behind the Paulson smokescreen.

WAS ‘PAULSON’ BEING BLACKMAILED TO COOPERATE?
It may reasonably be asked: if Paulson received a ‘pass-through’ bullet (assuming he is still alive, for the purposes of this analysis), why on earth would he subsequently cooperate with Bush and Cheney in this ghoulish play-acting? Good question.

Recall that Paulson resorted to blackmailing the President of the United States (even though Bush Jr. is the highest-ranking crook apart from the Godfather).

As reported previously, Paulson’s failed blackmail attempt went down like a lead balloon. If, as we are now required to believe, Paulson recovered from his ‘pass-through’ shooting experience and has been collaborating as a Dark Actor Playing Games in this charade, the only possible rationale for such behaviour would be that he is himself now being blackmailed by Bush/Cheney, and or threatened that if he doesn’t cooperate, the next bullet will be fatal. Such argumentation stretches the imagination somewhat, and might lead one to suspect that Paulson may indeed be dead, after all, as certain forensic investigators are continuing to tell us.

BUSH IN CHICAGO TO MEET WITH MAFIA BOSSES
On 7th January, while ‘Paulson’ was ‘speaking’ at the Westin Hotel, Bush 43 was in Chicago possibly meeting with representatives of organised crime there in connection with the colossal thefts that had taken place as described above.

Meanwhile, in the background, Bush 41 proclaimed, as Mr Cottrell reported to the Editor, that ‘he would never, ever pay Ambassador Wanta’ – even as the hyper-corrupt President N. Sarkozy of France, of Hungarian Jewish background (2), was supervising safe receipt of the funds stolen in recent days behind the Paulson ‘Black Ops’ smokescreen. There is also a new corrupt Jordanian connection about which the Editor has yet to be informed.

Also on 7th January, the ‘preparing to pay’ syndrome yielded its usual outcome, when it was again revealed that Bush 43 had interfered with the country and Tier 1-6 payments yet again, after the US State Department had confirmed (as had other payee sources that are in touch with the Editor) that ‘everything was set to be completed’ on Tuesday 8th January.

Following the exposure of this deception, three officials at the State Department were sacked, according to a usually reliable source who spoke to the Editor after 1.00am British time in the early morning of 8th January.

WHO IS DOING THE SHOOTING?
Before we revert to our deconstruction of the Paulson shooting and the subsequent obfuscation operation, the question of ‘who is doing the shooting’ needs to be addressed. It will be recalled that DOD Internal Affairs took over ‘enforcement’ and other grim activities when it transpired that the Provost Marshal was not doing his job. It has subsequently emerged that this General Rodney L. Johnson, the Provost Marshal, an old Cheney associate, had been compromised, having apparently been caught ‘in flagrante’ on tape. Unconfirmed reports have since indicated that he was severely dealt with, which is believed to mean that he was incarcerated.

The Provost Marshal appears to have fallen victim to bribery, but Nancy Pelosi, who was once upon a time thought to have been in favour of the Wanta Settlement and related payments, may have succumbed to something else. According to a reliable source who provided the Editor with this information on 4th January, Pelosi may have been suborned by Mrs Hillary Rodomski Clinton, having been offered the Vice Presidency ticket on Mrs Hillary Rodomski’s now failing election campaign, in exchange for blocking the Settlement and related payments.

The shooting of a close aide of Mr Cheney, reported in our posting dated 2nd January, has been separately described to us as having served Cheney’s purposes remarkably well, too. Specifically, this shooting was a kind of ‘sib’ operation (in which the perpetrator is made to look like the victim) – a setup that implied at once that Cheney himself was in danger of his life, whereas in actual fact he is the mastermind behind the ‘Black Operations’ associated with these bank robberies, which can collectively be described as the biggest bank hold-up in world history.

Now it may still appear to some uninformed observers that the Editor was the victim of a ‘sting’: but if that was so, it was true ONLY with respect to the reported DEATH of Paulson (assuming that did not happen) which in turn was based upon deliberate official lies fed to supposedly honest and reliable people (see below).

COUNTERPRODUCTIVE TO ‘PIGGYBACK’ SUCH A ‘STING’ ATTEMPT
However since the (pass-through) shootings of Mr Paulson, Mr Kimmitt and an unnamed senior US Treasury official did indeed take place, it follows that by ‘piggybacking’ the ‘sting’ onto the reality of the shootings, the Bushes, Cheney et al have simply contrived to lengthen the rope by means of which they are in the process of hanging themselves. In other words, they have exacerbated their problems, not the reverse. Because the shootings were true, and the ‘Black Operation’ to discredit the Editor of this service has drawn additional attention to them.

And also the Psy-Ops operatives have failed to discredit the Editor of this service, which was their intention: indeed several sources ‘close to the action’ have confirmed that the ‘Black’ lies fed to us were intended exclusively for that purpose.

THE COUNTERVAILING FORCE INSIDE THE U.S. MILITARY
Who is doing the shooting? The answer to this obvious question is that a countervailing force has developed within the American military, which has understood inter alia that the very actions of the military itself are destroying America’s military strength, an objective of malevolent foreign powers.

For instance, since the First Gulf War, some 500,070 veterans and other personnel have fallen ill with so-called Gulf War Syndrome, caused not (as some allege) by aspartame in Coca Cola (which turns into formaldehyde in conditions of great heat), while some 15,000 of their number have died from cancer and other conditions triggered by exposure to depleted uranium. The British Ministry of Defence is criminally covering up a similarly deplorable state of affairs in respect of depleted uranium-related illnesses among British military personnel.

The medium-term impact of this state of affairs will be to discourage young Americans from joining up, since it will become known that, due to the use of depleted uranium in armour-busting shells, signing up will mean dying early.

This may account for the reported fact that illegal Mexican immigrants are being recruited into the American armed forces, in the context of the unpopularity of Bush’s pointless and pitiless wars. Such recruits would be ignorant of the dangers they will face from contact with depleted uranium .

Anyway, due inter alia to such practical considerations, the countervailing force inside the US military is hardening in its attitude towards the confused shambles into which its corrupt civilian leaderships have led the armed forces, and is therefore sensitive to other parallel destabilising developments that threaten the future of the Republic – among which, we are now informed, is Wantagate and the unprecedented financial corruption that it has dislodged and exposed.

RESPONSE TO THE CRISIS BY THE MILITARY IS ‘INCREMENTAL’
We also learned on 8th January 2008 from a newly acquired US source in regular contact with the military, who has specifically been drawing their attention to our reports for the past 11 months, that the measures that are being taken internally by officers to address the corruption crisis are of an ‘incremental nature’. This coincides with information retailed by our own contacts speaking with US military personnel regularly. This point should be borne in mind by all those spectators who are understandably impatient for results.

When the time came for decisive action to be taken, following Citibank’s uncouth behaviour in kicking Ambassador Wanta and his diplomatic associates off the Citibank premises in midtown New York under the supervision of two armed NYPD cops on 20th November 2007, DOD Internal Affairs assumed the lead in lieu of the discredited Provost Marshal.

Shootings that have taken place to date have been undertaken against known traitors (who are also de facto war criminals) such as Paulson and Kimmitt, by expert specialists who are literally able to inflict ‘pass-through’ shootings which wound and may even temporarily incapacitate the targeted perpetrators but do not result in their deaths. It was such precisely targeted shootings that took place on 28/29th December 2007 (assuming Paulson did not die later and although we reiterate that we are not aware that Kimmitt has been seen since). Furthermore, at 8.05pm on 4th January, the Editor was authoritatively informed that ‘new people are in control at the Treasury’, which would make sense if the top three had been ‘taken out’.

DE FACTO PREDICTED CIVIL WAR WITHIN THE U.S. STRUCTURES
We also know that, effectively, a civil war is raging inside the US Federal structures as this horror story is being played out. For instance, the Special Forces operative seen (and reported upon) by Washington DC firefighters (see the report dated 2nd January 2008) was fleeing NOT (we are now informed by our military-connected sources) from the fire itself, but from Cheney’s own US Secret Service agents. That was why the Special Forces operative, whose hand was lacerated when he had to get through a window, refused hospital treatment.

This is the first ‘confirmed’ set-to between different formations inside the US Federal structures that we have been able to report to date.

The theft of $44 trillion+ that was perpetrated under cover of the Henry Paulson distraction, was preceded inter alia by the following further known monetary thefts and interferences reported to the Editor of this service by ‘connected’ contacts:

• At 10.40pm, on 3rd January, it was reported to the Editor that Bush Jr. and Cheney had ‘changed the banking codes’ for the Settlements again.

• $2.0 trillion previously stolen by Bush 41, was recovered on Friday 4th January.

• Several reports of massive attempted monetary thefts, which were thwarted.

SOURCES FOR PAULSON’S SHOOTING AND ‘DEATH’
The primary definitive source for our published statement that Paulson was shot on 28th/29th December 2007 was Treasury Compliance. This fact was reiterated to the Editor of this service in emphatic terms at 2.30pm on 8th January by Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., and is indisputable.

The source for our knowledge that Robert M. Kimmitt, the Deputy US Treasury Secretary, and a third senior Treasury official, were shot, also (but see below) on 28/29th December 2007, was a knowledgeable ‘connected’ source in the United States with whom the Editor has been in contact for months, who spoke to the Editor at 12.45 pm on Thursday 3rd January.

We cannot reveal the identity of this source, but the source is of course identified in our retained note of the conversation. At the time it was thought that the attack on Kimmitt, who speaks fluent German and is/was a long-term Bush aide, may have occurred on 2nd January; but the shooting is now believed to have occurred in the same timeframe as the shooting of Paulson.

INTELLIGENCE OPERATIVES ASK COTTRELL IF THE OFFICIAL KILLED WAS KIMMITT
On 3rd January, US operatives telephoned Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., with the request that Mr Story should not publish anything further on that date, following our report dated 2nd January, as the 2nd January report ‘was getting in the way of efforts to complete the Settlement and payments’. This information is exceptionally significant here. Why, if our report dated 2nd January, updated to report Paulson’s death, was impeding settlement, is it nevertheless maintained that our report that Paulson died was the product of as ‘sting’ to discredit the Editor of this service? Presumably the CIA and Cheney are ‘on the same page’: or are they not?

In the same conversation with Mr Cottrell, the intel operative who called him, in Mr Cottrell’s own words, ‘asked me if it was Kimmitt who was killed yesterday’, implying: (a) that our suspicion that Kimmitt may have been killed could be true and (b) that the Kimmitt shooting or assassination did actually take place on 2nd January, and not on 28/29th December. If intelligence was deceiving Mr Cottrell, the record stands that on 3rd January 2008, a US intelligence operative asked Mr Cottrell whether the official who had been killed on the preceding day was Kimmitt.

Given such FACTS, it seems to the Editor to be somewhat premature for everyone to assume that the ‘Paulson’ who surfaced, for instance, at the Westin Hotel on 7th January and on CNBC on the 8th, was actually Paulson himself and not a double, as forensics are telling us was the case.

STATE DEPARTMENT CONFIRMS THAT PAULSON DIED
At 4.50pm on Wednesday 2nd January 2008, this source informed the Editor by telephone that ‘the State Department have confirmed that Paulson died on 2nd January’. On 5th January 2008, the same source informed us as follows: ‘The State Department confirmed that Paulson is dead’. At the time, we again thought that the death occurred, if it did occur, on 2nd January.

However it was subsequently believed that Paulson may have died on 31st December. On 7th January, the Editor demanded of the same source (verbatim): ‘Did the State Department confirm Paulson’s death on 2nd January, yes or no?’, to which the answer was an emphatic YES.

At 11.40pm UK time on 5th January, the Editor again spoke with this ‘connected’ source, and asked for the identities of two other distinguished sources that had confirmed that Paulson had died. In this conversation, the source indicated that it was now believed that Paulson may have died on New Year’s Eve. Certainly, during the final weekend of the year, the Editor became aware that it was thought that Paulson might not make it into 2008. The two distinguished sources for the information that Paulson had died were revealed to be:

• A distinguished former Governor of the Federal Reserve (identity known to the Editor).

• An Ambassador (identity known to the Editor,
who has been asked to withhold his identity from this report).

We have telephone contact back-up for this information. As indicated above, the Gold Badges who read our report on 2nd January 2008 did not dispute any fact contained therein.

OTHER SOURCES FOR THE SHOOTING DATA
Other sources for these events included the following:

1. An email dated 30th December 2007 and timed as having been received by the Editor at 5:56pm. from a high-level US source who, again, has been in contact with the Editor of this service from some months. He cannot be identified but the email is of course in our files. In any public airing of these events, the email message in question (as with all our email traffic and underlying notes) will necessarily confirm everything that is stated here with reference to our sources.

It contained the following statement:

‘Chris, I was told that Paulson took a bullet either late Friday or early Saturday. That came from my US intel, with two confirmations. Then today my [reference to a foreign power] intel also confirmed it with an odd reply to the question, saying: “Well, sometimes people take it in the chest’.

Initially, the Editor thought that the phrase ‘took a bullet’ (not used in England), may have been a figure of speech, and asked for clarification. He asked whether it was a figure of speech or that that the phrase should be interpreted literally, applicable also to the foreign intelligence source’s elaboration. The answer was that it should be taken literally.

INDEPENDENT CORROBORATION OF PAULSON DEATH REPORT
At 17.59 UK time on 2nd January 2008, following the publication of our report that Paulson had been shot (updated to incorporate the report that he died), the Editor received an email message from a separate ‘connected’ correspondent, under the heading: ‘Henry M. Paulson, Secretary of the US Treasury, died today from his gunshot wounds’:

‘This is true. I have it confirmed from a source of mine. Thanks again Christopher for all you do and your amazing courage to carry through this’.

On 3rd January 2008, the website www.fourwinds10.com carried a ‘Casper Update’ which contained the following passage:

BUSH was confronted today with the death of PAULSON.

“That’s a lie” says he.
“Well, produce him”, says he.
“I can’t, says he, “he’s sick”.
“Yes, dead men are usually sick before they die”, says we.
“Can you produce the FIVE CHENEY ASSISTANTS who have been shot?!
“No”.

Before we complete this passage from www.fourwinds10.com, consider the following:

• If our report that Paulson had died is a ‘lie’, WHY DID THE TREASURY OR THE U.S. GOVERNMENT NOT ISSUE A CATEGORICAL DENIAL OF IT, given that such a report might be considered a problem for the financial markets? The President’s verbal statement that it was a ‘lie’ should have been followed up by a categorical official denial of the report.

Or was it simply that, since the report appeared in a despised ‘alternative media’ source, it could not be expected to affect the financial markets at all?

• Why did White House spokesman Tony Fratto have nothing to say about the report?

• But of course acknowledging that it was a ‘lie’ was out of the question, wasn’t it, because the report was based upon a confirmation from the US State Department (backed, we can reveal, by statements by an Ambassador and a former distinguished Governor of the Federal Reserve) that Paulson had died. So the President was not only contradicting the State Department, but was also saying that the State Department had lied! Did he warn Condoleeza Rice that he would contradict the State Department’s confirmation? Apparently not.

• Note that Bush 43 stated that he could not ‘produce’ Paulson, because ‘he is sick’. On the basis that the shooting was ‘pass-through’, Henry Paulson would have been ‘sick’ because he was still recovering from the shooting, which was not fatal. That would account for the appearance of an almost motionless Paulson ‘cadaver’ at the staged appearance that took place in the White House on 4th January (even though the Treasury’s website had explicitly stated that no appearances by Treasury officials had been scheduled for between 22nd December and 4th January). Alternatively, he was ‘sick’ because he was dead, and his subsequent choreographed appearances have indeed been performances by a hired doppleganger.

• Observe that ‘Casper’ referenced FIVE Cheney aides who had been shot (whereas we only knew of ONE). Since the President did NOT dispute the information contained in the question (namely that FIVE Cheney aides had been shot), we believe that this information has to be correct. Instead of disputing that FIVE Cheney aides had been shot, the Criminal President simply said that he could not produce them. Obviously not, because they had been shot.

The ‘Casper’ passage concluded:

The three administration people arrested per STORY Update were taken to The Hague.

BUSH mumbled something about an instant recession “IF”.

Allow us to elaborate here:

• The first statement provides confirmation that the three who were arrested as we stated in our report dated 2nd January were Administration officials (as we thought), not bankers. These officials were transferred to the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice in The Hague. Like the two Americans held by the Israelis pending payment of the funds that Paulson double-crossed them over (see the same report), these three US officials can be considered hostages pending the necessary settlements. Very interesting.

• The Criminal President’s mumble about an ‘instant recession “IF”’ was clearly a reference to his perverse stance that “IF” Basel II is implemented and applied in the United States, the corrupt banks’ on-the-books finances ‘will be’ severely constrained, tipping the country into recession at once (which is happening anyway).

Being interpreted, what he was trying to say but didn’t, was that his repeated interferences with the settlements represented an operation to frustrate and jeopardise or destroy Basel II, so that corrupt ‘business as usual’, could continue as though nothing had happened.

By extension, the desperate giga-thefts that took place under cover of the ‘Paulson obfuscation’ represented a frantic response by these cornered financial criminals to grab back as much of the stolen loot as they can, just in case they fail to frustrate the implementation of the new Basel II on-the-books banking regime, precluding corrupt ‘business as usual’.

At 5.20pm on Saturday 5th January, an authoritative source in the Southwest of the United States was reported to the Editor to have stated, with reference to Paulson: ‘He’s gone’. He added that ‘no-one is not accessible’. This email, too, is resident, of course, in our files.

MILITARY CONTACTS OF INDEPENDENT SOURCE CONFIRM THE DEATH
On 4th January 2008, Patrick J Bellringer posted the following comments in response to this message (typical of many that we also received in similar vein) on the www.fourwinds10.com website: ‘I saw Paulson on CNBC at 2pm EST sitting next to Bush. This should put an an end to this Paulson death nonsense’.

Like so many others, this ‘helpful’ correspondent revealed his naivety and failure to understand that an image on a TV screen nowadays can lie, and may even have no meaning. The information on the screen may be entirely ‘virtual’, which these critics appear for some weird reason not to understand. Bellringer responded inter alia as follows:

‘I have been slammed with email from doubters like you about the US Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson’s death being a hoax, and that I am a liar from claiming that Henry is now dead because you saw him on TV sitting with President G W Bush and VP Cheney. I ask: What did you see? Did Henry move? Did he speak? Did you see his eyes move? Were you looking at a video made by the CIA in their Hollywood studio? Were you looking at a lookalike (double), a holographic image or even a solid hologram?’

‘Is Henry Paulson dead? My military sources, some of whom participated in the incident in which Paulson was killed, say this is true. I have been informed that the Henry Paulson family are now making funeral arrangements. Why is this so, if he were alive?’

‘You must choose whom you are willing to believe. As Christopher Story has said: “You cannot have it both ways. Make up your mind which sources you trust, but don’t, please, burden us with your unbelief”’.

In a ‘Casper’ Update posted on www.fourwinds10.com on 4th January, the reporter commented:

‘We have at least as many sources as STORY claiming he is deceased and today’s video a fraud. One source says the family acknowledged his passing the day it happened, US military sources, banking sources, even WIKIPEDIA, said it’s true. The WIKIPEDIA obit, right below his picture, was removed within hours of posting. Another source said the family was making funeral arrangements. Others speak of a “stand-in”. Fox News and all present at the meeting of economic advisers would have to be in on the scam’.

SOME CLOSING FORENSIC OBSERVATIONS
Separately, on 3rd January, a correspondent drew our attention to the fact that the Wikipedia entry for Henry M. Paulson suddenly contained the phrase ‘Died: 2 January 2008’ beneath the Library photograph of this criminal operative. Now the text in that segment of a Wikipedia page is always blue. The date of death was shown in black. When the Editor checked the site (immediately after receiving the correspondent’s email), the date of death was missing.

The correspondent later confirmed that he had verified that the date of death had been there, but that it had been removed within hours of posting.

Forensic examinations of all the relevant tapes are in progress, and copies of all the ‘post-mortem appearances’ of Paulson have been acquired. This subject is getting too complicated to elaborate here, but a number of odd findings are worth adding now:

• Newsday.com, which had carried a report of the hastily convened meeting at the White House ostensibly between Bush Jr., ‘Paulson;, Bernanke and Leazar (Chairman, Council of Economic Advisers), had removed this report by 6th January, so that the listing jumped from articles published on 3rd January, to 5th January, with nothing listed for 4th January at all.

• A supposed photograph of the meeting, shown on the Treasury website, has Bush Jr., ‘Paulson, Bernanke and Lazear in that order with Mr Lazear furthest from the camera, the only problem being that a portion of Bernanke’s head, which is further from the camera than ‘Paulson’s’, intrudes over Paulson’s head.

• A Treasury Department photograph monitored on 8th January supposedly of the staged event on 4th January, had been changed. ‘Paulson’ was standing to one side.

An expert points out that this picture was suspiciously ‘identical’ to a known photograph of Paulson speaking at Georgetown Law School.

• Official pictures about the meeting on 4th January included one shot of President Bush and ‘Paulson’, with Cheney, who was not mentioned anywhere as participating at the meeting. Some reports on ‘Paulson’s supposed video appearance at the staged event on 4th January suggested that the person in question was under severe strain.

• If the Paulson video appearance at the staged meeting on 4th January was bogus, certain preliminary forensic findings support such a conclusion.

For instance, in video insertion and manipulation of Paulson headshot and hands took place, this would explain bizarre movements and expressions, with ‘Paulson’s’ shirt collar remaining still most of the time despite the head movement. The basic software being used for such fakery is the same, presumably, as that used in the fraudulent videos still concocted by the CIA purporting to be the updated ruminations of Osama Bin Laden, who actually died in Minnesota on 26th December 2001.

• FACT: The late John Chambers, who died in 2001, was the key makeup-to-go expert for the CIA. The current leading experts in making up doubles are believed to be Hollywood’s Rick Baker and Robert Sidell, a former colleague of Chambers.

Forensic examinations of video footage of the ‘post-mortem appearances’ are reliably reported to contain curious anomalies. Explanations of these will have to wait until later, or they appear in the Editor’s Wantagate book, in preparation.

THE ACTUAL SHOOTINGS HAVE NOT BEEN COVERED UP
The main point to take away from this report is that PART of the Paulson matter MAY have been an attempted ‘Black Ops’ discrediting operation. It impressed a small proportion of gullible people, augmented by paid Cheney Psy-Ops hacks who have bombarded the Editor with abusive emails as a consequence. After a few were examined, these were all trashed unread.

But the shootings were real (as the ‘death may still turn out to be’: it may be too early to be sure) and have NOT BEEN COVERED UP. Therefore, to attempt a ‘sting’ operation against the Editor of this service on the back of the shootings, was an act of desperation by the Dark Forces who have been exposed by Wantagate through this website.

The ‘sting’ was also a diversion, to redirect attention away from what was happening – giga-theft on a gargantuan scale, a.k.a. corrupt ‘business as usual’. As should soon become clear, this massive criminal and diversionary ‘Psy-Ops’ operation has crumbled.

TOUCH AND GO AGAIN: WILL THE CATASTROPHE BE PREVENTED?
While vast amounts of the stolen funds were quickly recovered – the four PROMIS teams monitoring these illicit financial thefts and movements 24/7 have had no rest – the issue that matters is whether the tiny cabal of World Class criminals will finally be stopped, by means which this Editor has no right to speculate about, or whether the financial and economic crash that we predicted on 2nd September 2006 and again in the summer of 2007 – will be allowed, thanks to the satanic intransigence of these ruthless madmen, simply to occur because the relevant powers inside the US structures fail to take whatever action they might consider appropriate in the circumstances.

As this report was being closed, we were being told that Citigroup has had all its assets, as well as its gold, frozen. This information was provided to the Editor by email at 2:12pm on 8th January. It could not be confirmed at this closing: but the very surfacing of such a report indicates ‘where we’re at’ – which the redirected Paulson diversion does not.

INCREMENTAL MILITARY PROGRESS (COULD BE TOO SLOW)
One final point. As indicated above, the belated response of the ‘counterforce’ within the US military plus the relevant elements of the Military Power, are operating ‘incrementally’. We have this information from TWO separate military sources. Therefore, events such as those that have taken place in recent weeks, and others that we don’t yet know much about, are, by definition, having incremental consequences.

If you haven’t yet understood what is going on as these forces come to the rescue of the Republic at the last moment, bear that important fact in mind. And it’s not one minute to midnight. It’s five o’clock in the morning, in case those who have been fast asleep hadn’t noticed.

MORE INDICATIONS OF PAULSON IDENTITY FRAUD BEING RECEIVED FROM ALL OVER…
The following indications that the ‘virtual reality’ folks have been playing around with Paulson images, and that our suspicions on this score may be well-founded, have been received:

(1) From an expert in these matters [received 9th January 2008, 23:12 UK time]:

Play the Microsoft Media Player video
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/01/20080104-4.wm.v.html
Right click your mouse while video is playing [may have to try this a few times]
Click ZOOM
Click FULL SCREEN
Right click your mouse while playing, again
Click PLAY SPEED
Click SLOW
[WATCH ENTIRE VIDEO] Notice the rear right portion of Paulson’s head blends in with the yellow [or gold] stripe on the blue Navy flag, in the background, when he turns his head back & forth wherein, thusly, the polygon [shape around the edges of an object] of his head is not at all definitive. This is indicative of video alteration, commonly called “being photoshopped”, named after the popular graphics, photo & video manipulative Photoshop software, though many other similar professional software packages that can do all this, also exist.

(2) From a correspondent [received 9th January 2008, 22:00 UK time]:

You are so right on…..they sure don’t want any photographs of that meeting with Bush & Bernanke and Paulson…I have looked and looked, and what was all over the news two days ago is strangely missing from view now!! Could it be they are hiding something??? It seems they don’t want anyone to see Paulson now: How strange…. You keep going Mr. Story, these rats are really on the run now. Thank you …thank you.

(3) From a correspondent in Canada [received 10th January 2008, 15:56 UK time]:

Message: 01/08/08 CNBC interview: Paulson’s Own Words Indicate Last Year [2007]:

Here’s where there’s a serious kink in the cover-up. In this video of Paulson,
supposedly in the morning of January 8 on CNBC, Paulson is asked a question
regarding the depth of the problem in the housing market and that the problem
was initially underestimated (UNSAID: because it covered up the underlying frauds).

Paulson goes on to answer the question as follows:

“Well I can remember, I came to Washington early in the summer of 2006
and I remember late 2006 early 2007 that most economists, as they looked at
housing were looking at it bottoming out sometime in 2007 and this problem
has been more significant than a lot of people, a lot of us first thought
it would be. I can tell you it was about MID YEAR THIS YEAR that we put
together, and I think we put together an effort to deal with this and I
think we’ll be talking about that later to deal with what’s going on in
the sub prime area”.

This interview was supposed to have taken place in the morning
of January 8, 2008 and yet he said “MID YEAR THIS YEAR that we put
together, and I think we put together an effort to deal with this”
meaning mid year LAST year. i.e. in mid-2007.

This is a strong indication that this interview was conducted towards the end of 2007,
and NOT on 8th January 2008 as the population is supposed to believe.

If this is a fraudulent report, CNBC is a party to the covering up of massive
financial fraud and would be a co-conspirator and an accessory to the fact
of crimes, including the murder of senior US officials, of course.

Link (first video about 3/4 towards the end):
http://www.cnbc.com/id/22555235

(4) From a US correspondent [received 10th January 2008, 2.45am UK time]:

Christopher,
This link came to me today and so I am forwarding after watching it, to you.
God bless you. Here is the link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIPVrMLXgBc

Note:

(1) The source’s email dated 6th January 2008 and timed at 05:47 am UK time, stated: ‘I called the Department of the Treasury and they acted very strange. The man I spoke to refused to identify himself and would only answer questions with questions ridiculing my willingness to believe alternative news sources. He was totaly insolent and rude and hung up on me’.

(2) An experienced businessman and traveller known to the Editor of this service, who has had extensive business in Hungary, informs us that Hungarian crooks are among the most ruthless and dangerous category of mobsters in the world.

• Editor’s Note: We are still, from time to time, receiving emails from frustrated people seeking documentation to ‘back up’ what we publish in these reports. Such correspondents choose to overlook the well-known fact that we have published several huge issues of International Currency Review which contain hundreds of pages of facsimiles of relevant documents. Since we are a commercial operation, we cannot make these volumes available free of charge.

• However copies are available in many university and other libraries around the world, and of course they can be ordered via this website at any time. But the main point here is that complaints along these lines reveal lack of knowledge of the background, which is that an immense volume of relevant documents has been published, while these reports are approved where necessary and appropriate either by the Principals or by Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., before being posted.

In the case of this presentation, the Editor conveyed a copy of the report for Mr Cottrell’s attention as a courtesy and at the same time to ensure that what has now been published here does not ‘cut across’ matters of an intensified nature that are currently in hand.

LEGAL SECTION:
PLEASE READ THIS INFORMATION, AS IT INDICATES THE DEPTH OF THE DEPRAVITY THAT WANTAGATE HAS EXPOSED. REPETITION OF THIS BASIC DATA IS STILL NECESSARY…

• We now repeat, yet again, our familiar summary of the Statutes, securities regulations and fraud information that we have appended to these reports for many months. The reason we append this information is to remind everyone of their clear responsibilities under the US Misprision of Felony legislation, and of course to provide a legal basis for these reports.

LEGAL RECAPITULATION FROM REPORT DATED 30TH AUGUST 2007:
Reiteration of the fraudulent transactions involving Bank of New York Mellon – a bank so arrogant and conspicuously indifferent both to its tarnished reputation and to its grotesque breaches of US law and of N.A.S.D./S.E.C. Regulations, that it now takes first prize in the crowded competition for the title of ‘Most arrogant and corrupt financial institution in America’. At least, this was the case until the perpetration of the ‘Saturday scam’ described above and on 13th November:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• ‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON IS IN BREACH AND OF WHICH THE SIX ‘LEVY BANKS’ MAY LIKEWISE BE VARIOUSLY IN BREACH [CREDIT SUISSE, UBS, DEUTSCHE BANK, BANK OF AMERICA, CITIBANK, THE BANK OF ENGLAND]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is in violation of:
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR SIR LEO WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT THE HIGHEST U.S. LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006, AND HAVE CONTINUED THEIR SERIAL CRIMES EVER SINCE:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war

This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Wanta’s funds.

The Directors and others listed in Part 1 of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and others posted on 11th June may likewise be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious violation of the laws itemised above. This list is reproduced in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, September 2007, on pages 163-168.

U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: MISPRISION OF FELONY:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

Wicked Pedia Update dated 2nd December 2007:

WIKIPEDIA IS PART OF AN NSA DISCREDITING OPERATION
As previously reported, the Editor’s attention was drawn, in the second half of November 2007, to a pack of old lies, diversionary claptrap and disinformation posted on Wikipedia under ‘Leo Wanta’.

Although this posting appeared FOR THE FIRST TIME on 12th November 2007, it consisted almost entirely of ancient lies, including disinformation dredged out of ‘Thieves’ World’, a hatchet job published in 1994 by Simon and Schuster by the late Claire Sterling, a CIA operative.

Mrs Sterling died suddenly after being summoned for her second meeting with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, under Clinton.

ANCIENT DISCREDITED LIES POSTED IN NOVEMBER 2007
The fact that the OLD Wikipedia lies appeared for the first time as late as 12th November 2007, and consisted almost totally of old, discredited lies, omitting the Master Lie that the CIA retailed after the Ambassador had been taken down, namely that he was DEAD, indicated quite clearly to the Editor and his advisers that this latest evil display of regurgitated disinformation represented a deliberate operation by the US intelligence community’s disinformation and lie machine, to begin, all over again, the process of discrediting Ambassador Leo Wanta – so that they can relieve him of his funds by some false pretext or other after a ‘gag order’ has been signed.

The definitive up-to-date information on the Ambassador’s affairs has been published on this website, and in several issues of International Currency Review, Economic Intelligence Review, Soviet Analyst and Arab-Asian Affairs, all published by World Reports Limited, for several years. Copies of these publications are in official, institutional and library hands all over the world. Therefore, any posting about Ambassador Wanta that relies upon ancient lies and fails to take account of the accurate information that we have published, can easily be demonstrated to represent yet another US intelligence community and NSA discrediting operation.

PRELUDE TO ‘SETTING UP’ WANTA ALL OVER AGAIN
We now understand that the Principals have been advised (for the past several weeks) that they will not be allowed to reveal that they have been paid. This loony state of affairs is designed to ‘set them up’ for a future discrediting operation whereby false witness will be deployed against them to the effect that they have stolen the money, or some such pack of lies, which they will be unable to refute because they will be bound by the ‘prerequisite’ gag order that is intended. Its purpose, of course, is to ‘legitimise’ the old and new lies that the US disinformation apparat will be preparing for future use. The likelihood is that the new discrediting operation will be extended to Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., as well. We are prepared for this intended onslaught.

EDITOR’S TRUE REPORT REPEATEDLY REPLACED BY OLD LIES
On 19th November, the Editor posted on Wikipedia the accurate text about Leo Wanta that is now reproduced below. The Editor’s accurate text was then removed by Wikipedia, leaving the ‘old lies’ that had existed previously. When the Editor became aware of this, he reposted the accurate text below, and, given that his own copy had been deleted, he then deleted the pack of lies, leaving his own accurate text up on the Wikipedia site instead, without the lies.

On 2nd December, the Editor was advised by a monitor that the Editor’s accurate text had been removed and that the old discrediting lies had been reposted on the page by Wikipedia. When the Editor checked, he found that the page could no longer be edited because of what the site managers described as ‘vandalism’.

IT’S ‘VANDALISM’ TO POST THE TRUTH, NOT ‘VANDALISM’ TO POST LIES
It was not ‘vandalism’ to delete the truth and to replace the truth by old lies, but it was ‘vandalism’ to delete ‘old lies’ and replace them by the truth.

We are therefore able to conclude from this Wicked Pedia outrage, as follows:

1. Wikipedia, which purports to ‘change the world’, prefers lies to the truth.

2. Wikipedia is therefore, by definition, a source of disinformation and lies, and cannot be trusted as a source of reliable information in any context.

3. The only category of sick society that would have any interest in disseminating lies about Ambassador Wanta, the United States’ greatest living patriot, rather than the truth, is the mentally disturbed US counterintelligence disinformation apparat (a.k.a. the US STUPIDITY COMMUNITY) which, by its actions in deleting the Editor’s ACCURATE information and replacing it with old lies, and by its illegal behaviour in ‘snipping’ our website texts as stated above, thereby reveals the desperation of its concerns, which all have to do with covering up official criminality.

4. It is now far too late for the US stupidity community to repair the damage that it has done since June 2006, when the Ambassador’s funds were first hijacked by the criminal financial operative Henry M. Paulson, US Treasury Secretary. So it is laying the groundwork for a renewed discrediting operation against Ambassador Wanta and his colleagues.

• We and others will see to it that this intention is defeated, and that such nefarious scheming is exposed for the amoral and disgusting Luciferian behaviour that it represents.

The ACCURATE text that the Editor posted on the Wikipedia site, follows. (The Editor, after all, PAID FOR AMBASSADOR WANTA’S EXIT FROM PROBATION, FOR GOODNESS SAKE, SO HE CAN HARDLY BE A SOURCE OF DISINFORMATION, CAN HE?). This information will be very widely distributed by other means, in order to provide all concerned with the necessary ‘heads-up’ as to what these US Dark Forces have in mind. They are out of their minds and in Satan’s mind:

The disinformation about Leo Wanta (Lee Wanta) below was first posted on 12th November 2007. It contains ancient CIA disinformation and long since exposed lies going back to the early 1990s, and obfuscates the truth. The report appended immediately below was added on 19th November 2007, to correct the disinformation contained in the original stub.

It was subsequently removed and is hereby replaced. This sequence of events, which suggests that egregious lies are preferred to the truth, has been recorded on www.worldreports.org, which contains all the updated and breaking Wanta material, that was ignored and traduced in the stub at the foot of this report.

THE ACCURATE TEXT THAT WIKIPEDIA REPEATEDLY DELETED
This is the correct information that we posted on 19th November 2007:

The ‘information’ posted below represents a deliberately malevolent, false disinformation picture which has no bearing on reality. It is a travesty of the truth of the matter and cites Christopher Story as the author of some of the disinformation, which is libellous and implies that Story, the veteran
Editor of International Currency Review of nearly 40 years’ standing, is engaged in the egregious dissemination of lies, which is not the case.

This is such an egregiously malevolent stub of disinformation that readers should prudently dismiss it altogether; they should start afresh by accessing Christopher Story‘s website, which is: www.worldreports.org., reading from the Archive.

www.worldreports.org is the authoritative source for all updated information on Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta. The source ‘Thieves’ World’ was a CIA disinformation work prepared by the late CIA disinformation operative Claire Sterling, published in 1994.

This stub regurgitates ancient lies perpetrated by the CIA, which lied for many years that Lee (Leo being his intelligence community name) Wanta was dead. The CIA proclaimed that he was dead so that corrupt cadres could ransack his funds (see below).

He ‘ceased to be dead’ with effect from 21st July 2005 after Christopher Story, a British private citizen, had paid $35,000 from his scarce private funds pro bono publico by way of ‘restitution’ to an American lawyer for onward payment to the Wisconsin State Department of Corrections, to procure Mr Wanta’s release from his illegal probation.

Despite his Ambassadorial status, Wanta had been illegally ‘taken down’ in Switzerland on 7th July 1993 without a warrant on a trumped-up Wisconsin State charge of having failed to pay $14,129 in falsely assessed Wisconsin State fabricated tax that he never owed because he had been resident in Vienna on US Presidential intelligence work since June 1988.

This data is all in the public domain, has been published for several years in International Currency Review, the Journal of the World Financial Community, and can be read on Mr Story’s website.

International Currency Review is a banking and financial journal with a worldwide circulation:
ISSN 0020-6490. It is published by World Reports Limited, London.

Notwithstanding that this fabricated tax demand (orchestrated by US criminal intelligence) had been paid twice under protest by Lee Emil Wanta from abroad (in May and June 1992), the funds were improperly allocated by the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue and were never credited to the false account maintained by them for the Ambassador. (Christopher Story holds documentary
proof of both payments). They were paid a third time by Christopher Story in June 2005, which action duly procured Mr Wanta’s release from illegal probation effective 14th November 2005.

As a consequence of Wanta thus ceasing to be dead, the CIA’s lie that he was dead collapsed in chaos, and all the subsidiary old false witness lies that the CIA had perpetrated, including those assembled for disinformation purposes in the stub below (which, in line with the standard false witness used throughout by detractors, attempts to portray Christopher Story as a source of disinformation) were discredited as well.

Why was Wanta taken down? So that the criminal intelligence cadres running the US Government could ransack the $27.5 trillion of funds assembled by Leo Wanta on President Reagan’s orders, in the course of his Financial Warfare operations against the USSR.

Under Reagan’s Executive Order 12333 of 1981, US intelligence officers were permitted to establish corporations which could thereafter contract with the CIA/DIA/DEA/NSA et al for the purpose of fulfilling allotted intelligence tasks allocated to them.

The financial proceeds of operations conducted by such corporations were consequently the property of the corporations and thus of their shareholders, a legal fact of life which has never been, and cannot be, disputed. This was not a good idea because almost all US intelligence
operatives are liars and do not function on the basis of the Rule of Law at all, if they can help it.

Lee Wanta is the well-known patriotic exception to this rule: he operates solely in accordance with US law, in contrast to the behaviour of other US operatives, which is why the kakocracy* needed to remove him from the scene, as duly occurred July 1993.

Once Wanta had been illegally arrested (contrary to international law, as a diplomat) and then thrown into a stinking Swiss jail on 7th July 1993, the criminal cadres inside the US official structures immediately ransacked Mr Wanta’s bank accounts according to plan.

The history of this matter is, and has been, elaborated in great depth on Christopher Story‘s website www.worldreports.org. and has been extensively published, as mentioned, in International Currency Review and other World Reports Limited intelligence publications.

Students are advised perhaps to begin with the ‘Wisconsingate’ report dated 6th August 2007, which forensically dissects, with detailed documentary back-up, the Wisconsin Department of Revenue’s tax fabrication operation against Wanta, stretching back for over 20 years, that has been exposed by Christopher Story in minute detail, and which formed the fabricated basis for Wanta’s illegal takedown in 1993, despite the fact that Wisconsin has no jurisdiction beyond its borders.

The overall Wantagate crisis, which is the sole and continuing underlying cause of the prevailing global financial and economic day of reckoning that the world is now facing, has been triggered by the fact that the George W. Bush Jr. White House, aided and abetted by other senior office-holders, hijacked the compromise financial settlement of $4.5 trillion that the White House itself agreed (in a classified accord that was finalised in May 2006) should be paid over to Ambassador Wanta, so that the stolen and diverted remaining $23 trillion of his funds (and the many hundreds of trillions of dollars hypothecated upon them) could be released from a de facto lien arising from the collapse of the CIA’s lie that Wanta was dead.

For clearly, since he had ceased to be dead, 100% of these funds (plus the hundreds of trillions of fiat ‘funny’ money generated by illegal leveraged operations from that base) belonged to Lee Wanta and to no-one else: a situation that the banks ‘could not handle’.

The entire narrative of what has become the worst financial corruption crisis in world history (which this stub consisting of disinformation attempts to obfuscate) is set out in great detail on Christopher Story‘s website www.worldreports.org., to which all readers are directed in order for the accurate state of affairs to be understood. As indicated, this stub below is a travesty and a disgrace, as it regurgitates long since discredited CIA lies, presents a diversionary, distorted and misleading picture, and because it malevolently incorporates Christopher Story as a source for some of this disinformation.

It is a disgusting instance of ignorant and malevolent US counterintelligence disinformation and deceit at its very worst.

All the statements in the above commentary may be verified by reference to www.worldreports.org and International Currency Review. Another publication covering this matter in detail is Economic Intelligence Review, also published by World Reports Limited, London. Wanta students should access the Archive on the www.worldreports.org Home Page.

A book devoted to Ambassador Wanta and the Wantagate crisis is in preparation

The Wanta disinformation referred to above has been deleted from this page. ENDS.

DIPLOMATIC STATUS OF THE PRINCIPALS
The Ambassador and his colleagues now have special diplomatic status (conferred upon them by HM The Queen in 2007), which means that the Ambassador is now an Ambassador several times over. This factor greatly complicates the intended discrediting offensive that the mad US stupidity community’s Dark Forces contemplate, their sole objective being of course to cover up their own criminality, in line with pending ‘thought crime’ legislation which has the same Nazi-style objective.

*Note: ‘Kakocracy’: Governance by a clique representing the worst elements of society, in their interests and to the exclusion of all other interests, from the Greek, kakos, meaning foul, or filthy.

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001.

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier Wantagate reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.